Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutO-09409ORDINANCE No, A14 ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO 6871, AS A1,1EN1ED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE VOR Ttit CITY OF MIAMI, BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION ON THE AREA BOUNDED BY APPROXIMATELY NORTH MIAMI AVENUE, NORTHEAST SECOND AVENUE AND A LINE + 104' NORTH OF, SOUTH OF, AND PARALLEL TO_NORTHEAST 41ST STREET, FROM R=C (RESIDENTIAL OFFICE) TO C-5 (LIBERAL COMMERCIAL); AND BY MAKING ALL THE NECESSARY CHANGES IN THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP MADE A PART OF SAID ORDINANCE NO. 6871, BY REFERENCE AND DESCRIPTION IN ARTICLE III, SECTION 2, THEREOF, BY REPEALING ALL ORDI- NANCES, CODE SECTIONS, OR PARTS THEREOF IN CONFLICT AND CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board at its - meeting of November 18, 1981, Item No. 9(a), following an - advertised hearing adopted Resolution No. PAB - 73-81 by a 7 to 0 vote, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of a change of zoning class- ification as hereinafter set forth; and - WHEREAS, the City Commission after careful consi- deration of this matter deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami and its inhabitants to grant this change of zoning classification as hereinafter set forth; ZJOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. Ordinance No. 6871, as amended, the Com- prehensive Zoning Ordinance for the City of Miami, be and the same is hereby amended by changing the zoning classification of the area bounded by approximately North Miami Avenue, Northeast Second Avenue and a line + 104' North. of, South of, and parallel to Northeast 41st Street, from R-C (Residential Office) to C-5 (Liberal Commercial), and by making the necessary changes in the zoning district map made a part of said Ordinance No. 6871, by reference and description in Article 111, Section 2, thereof. ■ Section 2, That all Ordinances, Code Sections or parts thereof in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed insofar as they are in conflict. Section 3. Should any part or provision of this Ordinance be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole. PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this 25th day of March . I , 1982, PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING BY TITLE ONLY this 22nd day of April ,1982. Maurice A. Ferre MAURICE A. FERRE , 1,1AYOR RA17H G. ONGIE CITY CLERK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: j' � X� JOEL E. MAXWELL ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: ORD11iA,"CE 1,10. Ai; ORDI:IA 10E A11t*NDI 1G' ORDI',,IA`ICE t10, 6871, AS AitE�IDED, THE C0*14PRE11EINSIVE 70NtNG ORDIi1ANCF FOR THE CITY" OF MIA111 BY ADDING A NEC-1 ARTICLE XXI-6 DLSION PLA A OVERLAY DISTRICT (SPD-4) PROVIDING FOR EFFECT OF THE OVERLAY DISTRICT, L1SE REGULATIOZ S , LIMITATIMS ON USES, YARDS, •HEIG-iT, FLOOD, AREA RATIOS, BONUS PROVISIONS AND PARitI11G ; BY REPEALI'11 C ALL ORDINANCES, CODE SECTIOi1S OR PARTS THEREOF It! CONFLICT AND CO71NTAIit1Ii1G A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE, WHEREAS, the liiami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of November 18, 1981, Item 9(b); following an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 74-81 by a 7 to 0 vote, RECO1,2EINDING APPROVAL of an amendment to Ordinance No, 6871, as hereinafter set forth; and 1,1HEREAS, the City Commission after careful consideration of this matter, deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami and its inhabitants to grant this amendment, as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. Ordinance No. 6871, as amended, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, be and the same is herebv amended by adding a new Article XXI-6 Design Plaza Overlay District (SPD-4); providing for effect of the overlay district, use regulations, limitations on uses, yards, height, floor area ratios, bonus pro- visions, and parking, to read as follows: Section 2. INTENT It is the intent of the SPD-4 Design Plaza Overlay to promote the orderly growth of the interior design industry which plays a significant role in the econo- my of the City of Miami and Dade County. It is, there- fore, in the public interest that every.effort be made to promote the development of the Design Plaza. Section 3, EFFECT OF THE SPECIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT (1) This district is superimposed over existing zoning districts and modifies these zoning districts to the extent indicated by the regulations set forth herein, (2) This district shall be identified in the Comprehensive Zoning Atlas by the prefix 5P'D-4 encorin ass in e-zistitig toning distticts, (3) All other 2,,onin- teRulations and ptoceclures not affected by this regulation shall be in Pull force and effect, Section 4. USV, IR'rGUtATIO1',IS The follo,,,in,, uses shall not be -oe-rmitted: (1) Sale and display of the following: a. agricultural implements b. construction equipment C, dairy supplies d4 machinery e, industrial equipment f. produce 91 truck yard or freight terminal h. lumber yards (2) The followinc, service establishments: a. battery repair and rebuilding b. bookbinding C. boarding kennel d. bottling plant, brewing and distilling of malt (beverage or liquor) e, diaper service f. fruit packing and shipping 9. laundry and rug cleaning plants h. milk distributing station i, tire recapping and retreading j. wholesale rebuilding of automotive parts, automotive overhauling and automotive paint and body shop. (3) The following repair and shop uses: a. heating contractors shop b. roofing contractors shop C. welding shop (4) The following wholesale, warehouse and storage uses: a, cold storage plant. b. frozen food lockers C. ice storage plants (5) The following miscellaneous uses: a. creamery b. railroad transfer, storage and team track (6) The following shall be allowed as Conditional Use: a. mixed use structures to include resi- dential uses if at least 50% of the structure is dedicated to commercial activity. -2- 1. auartment building and atart—:ent hotels not ex.ceedinz a densit-, of one (1) d`::e11inP_ unite for each one t:-ousand five hundred (1,500) square feet of lot area for buildings containing ffcm four (4) to 'L •, el•ve (12) units and a density of one (l) d,.•yelling unit for each additional five Hundred and fift=t (550) square feet of lot area for buildings containin more than t-:el.e (12) units (ORO. 8438) 2. the rewired parking for residential uses shall be one parking space per dwelling u , t irrespective of ARTICLE XXIII 3, for each duelling unit a minimum of 200 square Feet of open space shall be provided on the site. 4. the minimum floor area for a multiple dwelling shall be five hundred and fifty (550) square feet per dwelling unit for d,,ellina units not containing more than one bedroom. the minimum floor area for a multiple d;•;elling shall be six hundred and fifty (650) square feet for dwelling units containing more than one bedroom. the minimum floor area for an efficiency dwelling unit shall be four hundred (400) square feet per unit. -� Section 4. LIMIT LIO:,iS MN USES (1) Except for automobile parking lots, art and flower sales, nursery stores and outdoor table service for eatinff and drinking places, all activities, including sales, display, preparation and storage shall be conducted entirely within a completely enclosed building. (2) No second hand or used merchandise shall be offered for sale, displayed or stored, except in antique shops or art galleris. Section 5. YARDS There shall be no required yard except where a lot abuts upon a lot in any "R" (Residential) District; a yard of at least 10 feet in width with a 6'0" solid wall or fence dividing the property shall be provided adjacent to the "R" District. Section 6 HEIGHT In areas where the site abuts a "R" (Residential.) District, no building or structure shall be erected or altered to a height exceeding tao stories, said two stories not to exceed 25'0" may be in creased by 0, 3, No remote pail, i tg shall be allot•ied as ;part of this bonus 2. The floor area ratio may be increased b<Y 0.01 for each additional parking space per the required parking, prodded up to a maximum of 0,4, These additional spaces are to be made available to the public and no remote site parkin:; shall be allowed as part of the bonus. 3. For every square foot of pedestrian through connection, arcades and interior plazas,provided two additional square feet of building floor area for any permitted or conditional use shall be granted up to a total bonus of 0.3. 4, For each square foot of ground floor in- creased setback provided to a maximum width of 10'0'' for the first 10 feet of build- ing height, two additional square feet of building floor area for any permitted use shall be ,ranted up to a toral bonus of 0,3, Section 8 P.�.RKING On site parking, requirements shall be in accordance with the requirements of Article XXIII of this Ordinance, except for the follot.ing provisions: (a) All required on -site parking for permitted uses ma -- be located off -site. (b) 1, Within 600 feet of the premises it is intended to serve. 2. Before such parking facilities are approved, a recordable instrument for no less than five years shall be nronerL•y executed for the alternate facility, and said recordable instrument shall be filed as a matter of record in the Building Department of the City of Miami and Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, and said parcel shall not be utilized for any subsequent use without authorization of the Building or Planning Departments. 3. One parking space per 700 square feet of con struction shall be required for design indus- try wholesale operation. Structural alterations and additions to buildings with non -conforming off-street parking; would be permitted if the addition meets current parking requirements and 25% of the current parking requirement has been met for the remainder of the structure. Existing parking shall not be removed for this purpose unless provided on an alternate site, irrespective of Article XXIII, -4r Y 0409 G 0409 G Section 9: That all Ordinances, Code Sections or parts thereof in conflict herewith he and the same are hereby repealed insofar as they are in conflict. Section 10 Should any part or provision of this Ordinance be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be nvalid, the same shall not affect the validity of tre Ordinance as a whole. PASSED O't FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this day of 1982 . PASSED ANM ADOPTED ON SECOiID AND FINAL READING BY TITLE ONLY this da-,, of 1982. MAURICE A. FERRE , I•L4Y0D ATTEST: - RALP H G . ONGIE CITY CLERK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: - M:v',RK, A. VALE N TI: E A SISTANT CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS CORRECTNESS: GEORtr F. YNO:,, JR. , CITYV TTORNEY RESOLTaT1OL NO A RESOLUTION APPLYIivG TI-IF DESIG`t PLAZA OVERLAY DISTRICT (SF'D-a) TO "xtSTI4IG C-2 (COM11VU1IITY CO1- 11ERCIAL) , C=4 (GtNEP,\L M MERCIAL) A C- 5 (LIBERAL COZC�;rRCIziL) 0:1Ii1G C1' ASS F tCATIO"S ITT AN AREA BOUNDED IRR:GIIARLY BY THE F"EC RIGHT- Or -WAY, N,E, 36TH STREET, A LIidE 114' [,,TEST OF A ND PARALLEL TO NORTH 4IIAMI AVE1,1UE , N, E , 42VID STREET ATID A LI' E +100' PAR\LLVL TO AND SOUTH OF 'N,E_. 42 TD ST EE T ; AS PEP. THE ATTACItED, U�E RLAS, the TIiami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of November 19, 1981, Item No. 9(c), following an ad,,+ertised hearin`, adopted Resolution No. PAB 75-81 by a 7 to o vote, RECOI•D•!':,DING APPROVAL of applying the Design Plaza Overlay District, as hereinafter set forth; and 1%THEaF_.S, the City Cor,-mission, after careful consideration of this matter dee^is it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami and its inhabitants to grant said approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE C01,�MISSION OF THE CITY OF IMIAMI , FLORIDA: Section 1. The Design Plaza Overlay District (SPD-4) is hereby applied to the existing C-2 (Community Commercial) C-4 (General Corunercial) and C-5 (Liberal Commercial) zoning classifications in an area bounded irregularly by the FEC right-of- way, N. E. 36th Street, a line 114' west of an parallel to North Miami Avenue, N. E. 42nd Street and a line + 10.0' parallel to and south of N. E. 42nd Street, as per the attached. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of .1982. ATTEST RALPH G. ONGIE ITY CLERK 'REP. R4) AD10D� AUROIED BY: i by ' ; A . 1�ALE:'I' I; E ASS ISTALNT CITY ATTORNEY MAURICE A, FERRE, MAYOR �OV M Tt%,JORN CF GE F. KNOX JR, C ATTORNEY CORRECTNESS: F-1 nuir,ony i III 1 EXISTING ZONING C I LOCAL CONUOERCIAL R-C RESIDENTIAL -OFFICE C-2 COC.1('YiU(JITY COP41r0FRCIAL R-I ONE: FAMILY DWELLING C-4 GENEPAL CC%MMEIRCIAL R-2 1-L"JO-F/\(`.'1ILY DIVELLlf,JG C-5 LIBERAL COPANIERCIAL R-3 1-0111 DENSITY MULTIPLE DWELLING PROPOSED ZONING 1 i71 G 1 I SPP- 4 OVERLAY I!'17.12 R-C TO C-5 III 0 2IG 40G city. Of Miami Planning Dept- T ��r� li�111��11�llll lil�lll�ll� ORDINANCE NO. 9413 AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 1 AND 5 OF ORDINANCE NO. 9321 ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 24, 1981, THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS ORDINANCE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1982, AS AMENDED BY INCREASING THE APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE GENERAL FUND PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $41,143 AND BY INCREASING THE REVENUE FOR THE GENERAL FUND IN A LIKE AMOUNT FROM CHARGES FOR SERVICES (PUBLIC HEARING FEES); CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. ORDINANCE N0.9414 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 6871,`AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE CITY OF MIAMI, ARTICLE IV GENERAL PROVI- SIONS, BY AMENDING SECTION 26 — "TRANSITIONAL I USES — IN 'R' DISTRICTS" TO PERMIT TRANSITIONAL USES FOR ANY LOT IN A 'R•T RESIDENTIAL TRANSIT DISTRICT TO BE ANY USE PERMITTED IN A R-C RESI- DENTIAL OFFICE DISTRICT, AND BY MAKING ALL THE NECESSARY CHANGES 1N THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP MADE A PART OF SAID ORDINANCE NO. 6871, BY REF- ERENCE AND DESCRIPTION IN ARTICLE III, SECTION 2, THEREOF; BY REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES, CODE SEC- TIONS OR PARTS THEREOF IN CONFLICT AND CONTAINING f: A SEvGc'A Oil ITY CLAUSE. P RALPH G, ONGIE CITY CLERK CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA Set Lo Publication of this Notice on the 28 day of April 1982. 14128 M82-042802 -L Pg Qf2 ..-.m. wnp,' .s-`*Lsw,;a� `@�mwie?�zasn r+rm y-,;..5, sh.�•.,� .n.,.�....... , MIAMI REVIEW AND DAILY RECORD Published Daily except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays Miami, Dade County, Florida. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF DADE: Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Octelma V. Fetbeyre, who on oath says that she Is the Supervisor, Legal Advertising of the Miami Review and Deily Record, a daily (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) newspaper, published at Miami in Dade County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a Legal Advertisement of Notice In the matter of City of Miami Re: ORDINANCE NO. 9409 . in the .......... X X X .................... Couri, was published In said newspaper In the Issues of April 2.8r 1982 Afflant further says that the said Miami Review and Daily Record is a newspaper published at Miami in said Dade County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published In said Dade County, Florida, each day (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Miami in said Dade County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and afflent further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm' or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertiserpent for publication in jh ' aeidj newspaper. Svpm to arjd'jsybsrrribek before me this t , > 82, 28 h. day of ,. :� I�pr . ; 1.1-�s%aer P.�...... AL Betty J.43 *GoK ........ '%,dCol rry Public, Statp •olIgiiia at Large (SEAL)�t. rttlr'i1 Dh L``�� My Commission expires f(ih011441PAI- �O` MR 19! bitbl tiU PLOAi'A 3 MAL Witt All Interested Will take Notice that 6M the 22hd flay of AOFiI, 0132, the City Commission of Miami. Florida adopted this foit6Wing fitted otdihAhCe9: ORDINANCE NO.9407 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 6811, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE CITY OF MIAMI, BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF LOTS 2, 3, 4, AND 5 LESS THE WEST to' OF SAID LOTS 4 AND 5, AND LESS NORTH 5' OF LOTS 2 AND 5, BLOCK 6 RIVERSIDE FARMS SUPPLE. MENTAL (286), BEING APPROXIMATELY 735-737 NORTH- WEST 26 AVENUE AND APPROXIMATELY 736 NORTHWEST 25 COURT; FROM R-2 (TWO FAMILY; DWELLING) TO C-2 (COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL), AND BY MAKING THE NEC- ESSARY CHANGES IN THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP MADE A PART OF SAID ORDINANCE NO. 6871 BY REFERENCE AND DESCRIPTION IN ARTICLE III, SECTION 2, THEREOF BY REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES, CODE SECTIONS. OR PARTS THEREOF iN CONFLICT, AND CONTAINING A SEV• ERABILITY CLAUSE: ORDINANCE NO.9408 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 6871, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE CITY OF MIAMI, BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF LOT 16, BLOCK 30; NEW SHENANDOAH (10.55), BEING 2150 CORAL WAY, FROM R,C (RESIDENTIAL -OFFICE) TO C-2 (COMMUNITY COMMER- CIAL), AND BY MAKING -THE NECESSARY CHANGES IN THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP MADE A PART OF SAID ORDI- NANCE NO. 6871. BY REFERENCE AND DESCRIPTION IN ARTICLE III, SECTION 2, THEREOF, BY REPEALING ALL. ORDINANCES, CODE SECTIONS, OR PARTS THEREOF IN CONFLICT AND CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. ORDINANCE NO, 9409 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 6871, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE CITY OF MIAMI, BY CHANGING THE ZONING. CLASSIFICATION OF THE AREA BOUNDED BY APPROXI- MATELY NORTH MIAMI AVENUE, NORTHEAST SECOND AVENUE AND A LINE ± 104' NORTH OF, SOUTH OF, AND PARALLEL TO NORTHEAST 42ST STREET, FROM R-C (RES. IDENTIAL OFFICE) TO C-5 (LIBERAL COMMERCIAL); AND BY MAKING ALL THE NECESSARY CHANGES IN THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP MADE A PART OF SAID ORDI- NANCE NO. 6871, BY REFERENCE AND DESCRIPTION 1N ARTICLE 111, SECTION 2, THEREOF,. BY REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES, CODE SECTIONS, OR PARTS THEREOF IN CONFLICT AND CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. ORDINANCE NO.9410 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 6871, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE CITY OF MIAMI BY ADDING A NEW ARTICLE XXI.6 DESIGN PLAZA OVERLAY DISTRICT (SPD•4); PRO- VIDING FOR EFFECT OF THE OVERLAY DISTRICT, USE REGULATIONS, LIMITATIONS ON USES, YARDS, HEIGHT, FLOOR AREA RATIOS, BONUS PROVISIONS AND PARKING;: BY REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES, CODE SECTIONS OR PARTS THEREOF IN CONFLICT AND CONTAINING A SEV- ERABILITY CLAUSE. ORDINANCE NO.9411 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 6871; AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE CITY OF MIAMI, BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF TRACT 9, TOWNPARK SUB 4 (87,52) URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT FLORIDA R-10, BEING APPROXIMATELY 1434.1500 NORTHWEST THIRD AVENUE, FROM R-4 (MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE) TO GU (GOVERN- MENTAL USE) AND BY MAKING ALL THE NECESSARY CHANGES IN THE ZONING DISTRICT MAPS MADE APART OF SAID ORDINANCE NO. 6871, BY REFERENCE AND DESCRIPTION IN ARTICLE III, SECTION 2, THEREOF, SY REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES, CONTAINING A SEVER - ABILITY CLAUSE. ORDINANCE NO, 9412 AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 1 AND 5 OF ORDINANCE NO. 9321 ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 24,1981,THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS ORDINANCE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 AS AMENDED BY INCREASING THE APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE GENERAL FUND, IN THE AMOUNT OF $250,000 FOR. THE CITY OF MIAMI CONVENTION BUREAU, AND.RY INCREASING GENERAL FUND REVENUE IN THESAME AMOUNT FROM iNTERGOVERNMFNTAl (GRANTS FROM OTHER 'LOCAL 'L1NIT,S) ;FOR THE PUR•,• POSE OF RE -ENFORCING ACTIVITIES OF' -THE CITY IQF MIAMI CONVENTION BURFAU BY THE.M)RING 0.17 APPI= TIONAL STAFF ANP-THE INCREASING OF PRQMATIONA4. SERVICES; CONTAINING- A REPEALER PRAY*IQN,; AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. t.l'iY r NI I A " 1, r- LO R I D A matty Hirai dune 14, 1982 Deputy City Clerk Correction of Sctivetet'8 g�kot on Ordinance Terry V. Petty ' — Deputy City Attorney Ciiw Matty, the enclosed ordinance is an original to take the place of the one you have on file. There was a scrivener1 s error in the title of the Ordinance, it should read 41st Street instead of 42nd Street. Please call me or Joel Maxwell, if you have any questions. TVP: ia Enclosure I Howard V, Gary A T E December 2, Ml City M6nager CHANGE Or ZONMG-RECOHHi NDED N,E, 2hd Avenue and 41st Street COMMISSION AGENOA-danuary 28, M2 PLANNING & ZONING ITEMS ur 0 erez one Director Planning and Zoning Boards Administration The Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of November 18, 1981, Item #9(a), following an advertised Hearing, adopted Resolution No, PAB 73-81 by a 7 to 0 vote, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of a Change of Zoning of the area bounded by approximately North Miami Avenue, N.E. 2nd Avenue and a line + 104' north of, south of, and parallel to N.E. 41st Street, from R-C {Residential Office) to C-5 (Liberal Commer- cial). Five objection . s received in the mail. Forty-three replies in favor received in the mail. An ORDINANCE to provide for this Change of Zoning has been prepared by the City Attorney's office and submitted for consideration of the City Commission. AEPL:cm cc: Law Department NOTE: Planning Department recommendation: APPROVAL. 9409 PLANNING FACT SlItt T APPLICANT City of Mi,,uni Planning Department 10-28 -81 PETITION' 9, a. AREA BOUNDED 13V APPnOXVIATELY NORTR biI f1MAVL"NUE , Ni `ND .AVi NUE AND A LINE + 1041 NORTH OF, SOUTH OF, AND PARALLEL TO NE MT STREET Consideration of change of zoning classification from R-C (Residential Office) to C-5 (Liberal Commercial) REQUEST To provide for the expansion of the "Miami Design Plaza. BAC 1MrROC: D N'E 41st Street between North Miami Aventie and NE 2nd Avenue lies directly north of the Miami Design Plaza, which is the nationally and internationally significant concentration of businesses related to the interior design industry. This area ranks as one of the top four interior design cen- ters in the country, generates substantial etnplo%T,.(,,nt and has significant impact on the local economy. During the last few years this area has experienced major growth, currently there are three showroiin facili- ties under construction and others are planned. Development along 41st Street is currently characterized by older apartment and duplex development; parking lots and a day care Centel,. While structural• conditions are generally good there has been decreasing levels of property maintenance and increas- ing deterioration. ANALYSIS Additional space is needed within the Design Plaza for t:)usiness expansion. The growth of the Pla:,a north to NE 41st Street should be encouraged. A need exists for space for interior designers, manufacturers' represen- tatives, architects and other related pro- fessionals and showrooms. NE 41st Street is presently zoned R-C which prohibits show- room facilities. 9409 , RECO:.2,1END 1'TIO:v PLAN IN DEPAIIITMENT PLANNI I NG ADVISORY BOARD In 1980 this property was rezoned from R-3 to R.--C in order to stimulate redevelopment a R2 C zoning- has proven to he too restrictive in terms of user and does not meet the current market demands of the area. The proposed expansion of the Design Playa north to 41st Street is recommended in the Miami Neigrhborhood Comprehensive Plan. This Proposal for rezoning has been prompted by a request of the Decorators Roc Merchants Association for additional space for busi- ness development north of 40th Street. APPROVAL RECOiii%lEi•1DED APPROVAL on 11/18/81 by a 7 to 0 vote. . • i �`'1 S.,\iIr'/ !.w aw i� 1✓{!'`i,�l_J `.i l� Howard V. Gary ->r December 2, 1981 City Manager ORDINANCE AMENDENT=RECOMMENDED ARTICLE XXI-6 DESIGN PLAZA OVERLAY OISTRIC r COMMISSION AGENDA=January 28, 1982 Aurelio E, Perez�Lugones ..,.,,,_.PLANNING & ZONING ITEMS . Director Planning and Zoning Boards Administration The Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of November 18, 1981, Item 49(b), following an advertised Hearing; adopted Resolution No. PAB.74=81 by a 7 to 0 vote, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of amending Comprehensive Zoning.Ordinance 6871 by adding a new ARTICLE XXI-6 DESIGN PLAZA OVERLAY DISTRICT (SPD-4) providing for effect of the overlay district, use regulations, limitations on uses, yards, height, floor area ratios and bonus provisions, and parking; as per the attached. Five objections received in the mail. Forty-three replies in favor received in the mail. An ORDINANCE to provide for this Overlay District has been prepared by the City Attorn office and submitted for consideration of the City Commission. AEPL:cm cc: taw Department NOTE: Planning Department recommendation: APPROVAL. 9409 PLAN*Nt?YG FACT SHEET APPLICANT City of "liami Planving Department 10-23-81 PL'•TITION' 9b. ' Consideration of an amendment to Compre- hensive Zoning Ordinance 6871 as amended, by adding a veto ARTICLE XXI-6 DBSIG' . PtA1A OVtR- LAY DISTRICT (SPD-4) providing for effect of the overla-V district, use regulations; limitations on uses; yards; height;floor area ratios and bonus provisions,, and parking, BAC G %0U`;D- _ On .July 23, 1981 the Miami City Commission approved in principle the Miami Design - Plaza Parking Study (Resolution 81-726). This study recommended a series of public and private actions needed to encourage the con- tinued growth of this economically vibrant - commercial District. The unique nature of the interior design industi,v necessitates the establishment of a .Special Purpose District (SPD) within the Miami Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance The current predominate C-5 (Liberal Com- mercial) zoning and current parking require- ments Without major modifications, would in- hibit the continued growth of the area. It is the major objective of the City to cen- tralize the interior design industry within the existing Design Plaza Area (note map). ANALYSIS The Miami Design Plaza Overlay District - (SPD-4) will restrict the land uses that are deemed not compatible with the interior design industry. Over Soo of the 217 busi- nesses located within the area are related to the interior design industry. C-5 (Li- beral Commercial), the predominate base zon- ing for the district, allows a far too ex- tensive array of land uses. Residential development is currently pre- cluded in the area but the overlay will allow it as a conditional use in conjunction with commercial development. 9409 , Current parking tequirements are inadequato to serve the needs of the atea, Due to the nature of the wholesale business Con- ducted in the Design Plaza Area, the park- ing requirement for wholesale activity Will be increased from one parking space per 1000 square feet of construction to one parking space per 700 square feet of Construction. The lack of available lend and excessive land costs have made it extremely diffi- cult to secure required parking on -site or within "s00 feet as presently mandated, This ordinance specifies' that parking may be within 600 feet of the premises they are to serve, this allows the merchants that are located in the core of the Design Plaza the opportunity to expand and have greater flexibility in providing required parking. This would enable th.e better utilization of PEC ROW between 30th.and 42nd Streets which is available for lease. ® In addition, structural alterations and additions to buildings with non -conforming off-street parkins would be permitted if the addition meets current parking re- quire►�ients and 25 J of the current park- ing requirements have been met for the remainder of the structure. At the pre- sent time additions to structures or ma)or structural renovation (over SO' assessed value) require that the current parking requirements be met for the total build- inp. Due to the difficulty in securing _ suitable land for off-street parking the need to allow for the continued orderly growth of the core area of the Design Plaza (NE 39th and 40th Streets). The overlay will also increase the base Floor Area Ratio (FAR) from 2.0 to 2.5 and z permit it to further increase to 3.0 through a series of bonus provisions granted for covered parking, extra parking, setbacks and pedestrian amenities. This will allow for larger structures more consistent with industry trends and will foster the con- tinued redevelopment of the District. RECCINt'.1E vDATION .APPRO%'AL P LA`NI'�X DE PARTNIE NT PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD RECOMIMENDED: APPROVAL on 11/18/81 by a 7 to 0 vote. 9409 rI o iy l o,'� Howard V. Gary City Manager r•.,. Aurelio E, Perez-Lugones Director Planning and Zonin Boards Administration December 2, 1981 =1LE. APPLY DESIGN PLAZA OVERLAY DISTRICT RECOMMENDED COMMISSION AGENDA -January 28, 1582 PLANNING & ZONING ITEMS The Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of November 18, 1981, Item #9(c), following an advertised Hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 7S-81 by a 7 to 0 vote, REC01"IMENDING APPROVAL of applying the Design Plaza Overlay "District (SPD-4) to existing C-2 (Community Commercial), C-4 (General Commercial) and C-5 (Liberal Commercial) zoning classifications in an area bounded irregularly by the FEC right of way, N.E. 36th Street, a line 114' west of and parallel to North Miami Avenue, N,'E. 42nd Street and a line + 100' parallel to and south of N.E. 42nd Street, as per the attached. _ Five objections received in the mail, Forty-three replies in favor received in the mail. An ORDINANCE to provide for this Overlay District has been prepared by the Cityy�ittorney's office and submitted for consideration of the City Commission, AEPL:cm cc: Law ,Oepartment NOTE: Planning Department recommendation: APPROVAL. '40 PLANNING VACT SNPDT APPLICANT: City of ;Miami Planning Department; 10-28-81 PCTITIOv: 9c, AREA BOUNDED IRRI GULARLY tY PI C ROW, NE �Ml STREET, F, A LIME 114' WEST Or AND PARALLEL TO NORTH MLAMI ATENUE. NE 421ND STREET AND A LINE BACOKGROUND , .'AL`IS I S RECO' DiE` DATIO`y PLANNING DEP kPT `I T_- "T PLANING ADVISORY BOARD ' '+' .^� �a L TO i 1 a 1U, , STREET. Consideration of applying Design Plaza Over" lay District (SPD-4) to existing C-2 (Community Commercial) C-4 (General Commercial) and C-5 (Liberal Commercial) zoning classification, The Miami Design Plaza area is currently zoned C-2 (Community Commercial) C-4 (General Commer- cial) and C-5 (Liberal Commercial) these zoning catagories do not meet the unique requirements of the interior design industry and do not provide a catalytic force for redevelopment, The Design Plaza Overlay provides more flexible land use controls which will help to stimulate the continued development of the Miami Design Plaza and v:,ill buffer the abutting residential districts from incompatible land use activities. Approval REM',11MENDED APPROVAL on 11/18/81 by a 7 to 0 vote. I l I _ B 1 NE.*42 ST. n i 14 J n OF CID .0 ,0 N - :4 0 51 -P D t: E_ 59 ST.uj — ,Q D Li � n!� PORT EXPfiESSWAy --- L4o a m } ED V EWA` J Z y z m �r (� It i 1 1 �I mw I < r G-2EXISTING zONJUG %Ill o C C-3 LOCAL ;COMMERCIAL R-C RESIDENTIAL -OFFICE -(;-2 COMA+ UNITY 'COMMERCIAL R-'1 ONE,FAMILY DWELLING C-4 GE'NEIRAL COMMERCIAL R-2 TWO-FAMILY DWELLING C-5 LIBERAL �COMMEf CIAL R-3 LOW DENSITY MULTIPLE DWELLING IPi3GI OSED Z NING 11-1r7311 SP;P- 4 OVERLAY '1 _7_2 R-C TO C-5 ILLII I ! 0 200 400 City. of Miami Planning Dept.