HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-82-0374i
RESOLUTION 1,10. 8 2- 3 7 4
A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ORDERING RESOLUTION
'.. NO. 82-256 AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK
i TO ADVERTISE FOR SEALED BIDS FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF BUENA VISTA HIGHWAY IMPROVE-
MENT -PHASE I IN BUENA VISTA HIGHI9AY IriPROVE-
MENT DISTRICT -PHASE I, H-44'(5.
WHEREAS, at, the City Commission Meeting of March 16,
1982, Resolution No. 82-256 was passed i%,hich ordered a highway
improvement identified as BUENA VISTA HIGH1-!AY TMPROVEMFNT-PHASE I
in BUENA VISTA HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT -PHASE T, H-4475; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to due public notice a public hearing
was held before the City Commission on May 11, 1982, as to any
objections to the confirmation of Resolution No. 82-256, i%hich
resolution ordered RUENTA VISTA HIGHWAY IMPROVF%,!ENT-PHAFF T in
BUENA VISTA HIGHWAY I!1PROV7,T.'FI4T DTSTRT_CT-PHASE I, 11-14475; and
11HEREAS, no objections to the confirmation of said highway
improvement were sustained Dy tt;e Commission, it is therefore in
order for the Commission to confirm said ordering; resolution and
authorize the City Clerk to advertise for sealed bids for the
construction of said improvement;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COIIMTSST014 OF THE
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. Resolution No. 82-256 dated March 16, 1982,
which ordered BUtI'NA VISTA HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT -PHASE I in BUENA
VISTA HIGHWAY TMPROVE14FNT DISTRICT -PHASE T. H-4475 is hereby
confirmed.
CITY COMMISSION
MEETING OF,
MAY 1 11982
MULUnON Nab 23 7
,
i
Section 2. That the City Clerk he, and he is hereby,
authorized to advertise for sealed bias for the construction of
BUENA VISTA HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT -PHASE I in BUFNA VISTA HIGHWAY
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT -PHASE I, H-4475.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of May
1982.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
Deputy City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
CORR ESS:
City Attorney
-2-
f'
Maurice A. Ferre
M A Y 0 R
82-374
r
i
CITY MANAGER'S ESTIMATE OF COST
OF
LOCAL IMPROVEMENT AND INCIDENTAL EXPENSES
BUENA VISTA HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT - PHASE I H-4475
i
'. ORDERED BY RESOLUTION NO. 82- 256 ADOPTED MARCH 119 1982
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST OF IMPROVEMENT. . . . . . . . $1,4509000
ESTIMATED INCIDENTAL EXPENSES:
Surveys; inspection and supervision
of work; preparation of plans,
specifications and estimates. . . . . $160,000
Printing; publishing of notices
and proceedings; preparation of
bonds; legal services; abstracts;
and other necessary and proper
expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 30,000
Total Estimated Incidental Expenses. . . . . . . $ 190,000
ESTIMATED INDIRECT COSTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 60,000
TOTAL ESTIMATED C014STRUCTION COST AND EXPENSES. . . . . . $1,700,000
DISTRIBUTION:
n Estimated
Cost to be
paid
by City
of Miami . .
. . . $1,428 000
Estimated
Cost of all
items to
be
assessed . .
$ 272,000
Estimated
Assessment
per
front
foot
. . . . . .
. . . $8.80
Estimated
assessment
per
l.f.
of
curb . . . . .
. . . $1.65
Estimated
assessment
per
l.f.
of
curb and gutter.
$1.80
Estimated
assessment
per
l.f.
of
valley gutter.
. $1.65
Estimated
assessment
per
l.f.
of
sidewalk . . .
. . . $2.20
Estimated
assessment
per
s.y.
of
8-inch limerock
base $2.05
Estimated
assessment
per
s . y.
of
1-inch asphaltic
concrete $0.70
WITNESS my signature at Miami, Florida this day of
A.D., 1982.
CITY MA14AGER
9
82-374
y/9/8i
f
• CItY OF MIAMI. FLORIDA
r
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO Howard V. Gary DATE April 159 1982 F,��: B-4475
City Manager
SUBJECT BUE14A VISTA HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT —
PHASE I, H-4475 - Resolution
Confirming Ordering Resolution
FROM REFERENCES
Doned W. Cath ENCLOSURES
D for Works (For Commission Meeting of
_ Ma ";4- 1 82
�l
�a
ti The Department of Public Works recommends
cv adoption of a resolution confirming orderingr
resolution No. 82-256 and authorizing the
ti_ cam,. City Clerk to advertise for sealed bids for
BUENA VIST.': HIGHU!AY IMPRO'' EMENT-PHASE I in
N the BUENA VISTA HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT-
°O PHASE I, H-4475.
Buena Vista Highway Improvement -Phase I was ordered by the City
Commission on March 16, 1982. It is now in order to confirm the
ordering, resolution and to authorize advertising for bids.
A public hearing; will be held by the City Commission at their
meeting of May 13, 1982. At that time the Commission will hear
objections to the confirmation of the ordering; resolution, no. 82-256.
This improvement is being; proposed as an assessable improvement under
Section 56 of the Charter of the City of Miiami. This district is
bounded by I;.1,', u6 Street, 1;.1". 54 Street, 2 Avenue and 1,1,11% .5
Avenue; and also by N-1'!. 50 Street, N.W. 53 Street, 5 Avenue and
h. 6 Avenue.
The overall condition of the street rights of way in this area has
become severely deteriorated. Side Parkways are in poor condition
due to extensive on -street parking; pavement is out or grade and/or
off -center; and drainage problems are extensive.
All of these problems will be corrected by BUENA VITA HIrH1-'AY IMPROVE-
MENT -PHASE I. The proposed construction will include asphaltic
pavement, concrete sidewall�, concrete curbs and/or gutters, storm
drainage and landscaping.
BUENA VISTA HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT -PHASE I is currently included in the
City of Miami's 1981-87 Capital Improvement Program for construction
in fiscal 1983-84. The construction of this improvement will be
rescheduled for fiscal 1982-83 and will be funded by Highway and Storm
Sewer General Obligation Bond Funds.
DCB: rj
Resolution attached
82-37
4
101 N. W. 47th Terrace
Miami, Florida 33127
May 11, 1982
CITY OF MIAMI
COMMISSIONERS
Dear Commissioners:
In the regular meeting of the Great Neighborhood Association, The
Buena Vista Highway Improvement --Phase I H-4475 was discussed in
which 25% of the cost of the street improvement would be assessed
to the abutting progr4 owners.
By unanimous vote of members present, the following is proposed:
1. Street improvements outlined in your letter of April 29
to all property owners, should be improved with community
development funds. (CD Funds), as was used to improve the
other streets in the neighborhood.
2. No street improvements are to be made until the residents
can discuss this through our association.
i _/icerely yours,
,,
L• u/L�
Freddrick Stewart, President
FS:ls
0
May 10, 1982
Miami City Commissioners
City Hall
3500 Pan American Drive
Miami, Florida 33133
Dear City Commissioners:
•
Members of ACORN and the Model City Community Development
Advisory Board have met on several occasions to discuss
funding for Phase I and II of the Manor Park Highway Improve-
ment Project. We are fully aware that similar projects
throughout Miami have been completed over the past several
years without any special assessment to residents. In
fact improvements are now being completed in the King
Heights neighborhood, north of NW 54th Street from NW 12tn
Avenue to NW 7th Court. Now special assessments are required
for the Manor Park neighborhood just to the south of King
Heights and a part of the same neighborhood strategy area.
The Advisory Board supports the ACORN group appeal to elimi-
nate the special assessments for street improvements by find-
ing an alternative source for subsidizing the completions
of the improvements without assessing adjacent property
owners. The Board feels that Community Development Block
Grant funds would be one potential source of funding for
this project.
Please do not -misunderstand the Board's position of support
for the ACORN group as opposition to the street improvement
projects planned for the area. We feel the streets improve-
ments are important for revitilizing the neighborhood and
would like to see them completed. However, we hope that
you will give consideration to utilizing other resources
to eliminate assessments where such assessments pose a
hardship on property owners.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Si 'cerely,
Willie Calhoun
Model City Advisory Board Chairman
City Commissioners
City Hall
Page 2
cc: Model City Advisory Board Members
Howard V. Gary
City Manager
May 100 1982
Dena Spillman, Director
Community Development
Donald W. Cather, Director
Public Works
Joseph W. McManus, Acting Director
Planning Department
Laurence Martinez
Model City Planner
James London
Community Service Worker
F. 8 2 - J .j 4j
Le
TO. Dena Spillman
Director
Comm t De a lopment
FROM Frank Castaneda
Assistant Director
Community Development
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
J t-r..r......�. ram... �...•
"srE April 21, 1982
Community Development Funds
for Street Improvements
R FEriENCES City Commission Meeting
May 11, 1982
The Community Development Block Grant
then, approximately $10.1 million has
street improvement projects throughout
mately $2.1 million of which has been
improvements, for improvements in the
:R !.
Program commenced in 1975. Since
been allocated from this fund for
the various target areas, approxi-
allocated to Model City street
King Heights area.
Each community through the assistance of its planners decided on the
amount of funds that through the year: should be allocated for street
improvements. Certain areas such as Downtown and Little Havana elected
to allocate only limited funds for street improvements - $59,557 and
$349,326, respectively. Other target areas such as Allapattah ($2.4 mil-
lion), Edison/Little River ($2.1 million) and Model City, ($'2.1 million),
allocated considerable sums of money for this purpose.
Last year, which was the last year of the three-year plan, the target
areas were informed that the seventh year would be the final year in
which Community Development funds would be utilized to fund street
improvements. This recommendation was made known to the target areas
and approved by the City Commission. This policy was reiterated by the
City Commission at this year's April 1 Community Development public
hearing,
Community Development can no longer afford to continue to fund street
improvements. Our allocation since the sixth year (180-81 fiscal year)
allocation has been reduced from an 11.3 million dollars high to 9.6
million in the eighth year. The Reagan administration has drastically
cut all housing programs,in a city with a severe lack of safe, sanitary
L—� and affordable housing. As a result of this, staff recommends that
forty percent of its eighth year budget be allocated for this purpose.
In conclusion, since there are Highway Bond Funds available for street
improvements, it is staff's recommendation that the policy of not fund-
ing street improvements from Community Development funds be continued.
/cr
t
i
I '
f
I
101 N. W. 47th Terrace
Miami, Florida 33127 -
flay 11, 1982
CITY OF MIAMI
COMMISSIONERS
Dear Commissioners:
In the regular meeting of the Great Neighborhood Association, The
Buena Vista Highway Improvement --Phase I H-4475 was discussed in
which 25% of the cost of the street improvement would be assessed
to the abutting property owners.
By unanimous vote of members present, the following is proposed:
1. Street improvements outlined in your letter of April 29
to all property owners, should be improved with community
development funds. (CD Funds), as was used to improve the
other streets in the neighborhood.
2. No street improvements are to be made until the residents
can discuss this through our association.
Sincerely yours, —
\ - Freddrick Stewart, President
FS:ls
_fG-3';;;y