HomeMy WebLinkAboutO-094271 a
ORDINA14CE 140. 9 4 2 7
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 17 OF THE
CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS
AMENDED, "ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION" BY
REPEALING SECTION 17-4 OF SAID CHAPTER,
ENTITLED "ENVIRONMENTA.L PRESERVATION
REVIEW HOARD" AND SUBSTITUTING THEREFOR
A NEW SECTIOLl 17-4, ENTITLED "HERITAGE
CONSERVATION BOARD"; AND BY REPEALING
SECTION 17-5 OF SAID CHAPTER, ENTITLED
"ADDIINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT TO THE ENVIRON-
NENTAL PRESERVATION REVIEW BOARD" AND
SUBSTITUTING THEREFOR A NEW SECTION 17-5,
ENTITLED "HERITAGE CONSERVATION OFFICER";
AND BY REPEALING ALL REFERENCES TO THE
TERM "ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION REVIEW
BOARD" IN SECTIONS 17-6, 17-7, 17-12,
and 17-14, OF SAID CHAPTER AND SUBSTITU-
TING THEREFOR THE TER"1 "HERITAGE CONSER-
VATION BOARD"; AND BY REPEALING ALL REFE-
RENCES TO THE TERM "ADMINISTRATIVE ASSIS-
TANT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION
REVIENI BOARD" IN SECTIONS 17-8 and 17-12
PROVIDING FOR A DELAYED EFFECTIVE DATE;
AND SUBSTITUTING THEREFOR THE TERM "HERI-
TAGE CONSERVATION OFFICER"; AND REPEALING
ALL ORDINANCES, CODE SECTIONS OR PARTS
THEREOF IN CONFLICT; AND CONTAINING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE.
WHEREAS, the r-4iami Planning Advisory Board, at its
meeting of February 17, 1982, Item NO. 5(C), following an
advertised hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 14-82 by a
unanimous vote (2 members absent) RECOMEIENDING APPROVAL of
Amending Chapter 17, Environmental Preservation, of the Code
of the City of Miami, as hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, the Miami City Commission finds that in order
to protect the educational, cultural, economic, and general
welfare of the public and to promote a sense of identity,
stability and civic pride amongst City residents, it is
necessary to recognize and conserve significant elements of
fliami's historical, cultural, archeological, aesthetic, and
architectural heritage; and
WHEREAS, much of Miami's rich and varied heritage is
embodied in its buildings, improvements, landscape features,
archeological sites, areas, neighborhoods, and scenic
vistas; and
10
WHEREAS, the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
recommends adoption of an ordinance to protect the City's
heritage as embodied in such buildings, improvements, land-
scape features, archeological sites, areas, neighborhoods,
and scenic vistas; and
WHEJZEAS, Metropolitan Dade County Ordinance No. 81-13
provides that all municipalities shall have up to and inclu-
ding July 1, 1982 to adopt local ordinances with respect to
historic districts, sites, and archeological zones; and that
such ordinances shall provide for establishment of an his-
toric preservation board with powers and duties; and —
WHEREAS, the Miami City Commission deems it advisable
and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City
of Hiami and its inhabitants to approve the establishment
of a Heritage Conversation Board;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. Chapter 17 of the Code of the City of
Miami, Florida, as amended, entitled "Environmental Preser-
vation" is hereby further amended as follows:
(A) Section 17-4 of said Chapter 17, entitled "En-
vironmental Preservation Review Board" is hereby
repealed in its entirety and the following is —
hereby substituted in its place:
"Section 17-4. Heritage Conservation Board
The Heritage Conservation Board as established
under Section 62-70 of Article VII of Chapter
62 of this Code shall be responsible for main- -
taining a record of unique environmentally sig-
nificant lands or sites within the city. The
board shall serve as the quasi-judicial instru-
ment for granting or denying certificates of
approval for tree removal and development activity
2
94P7
& a
E
within those areas identified and established
as environmental
preservation
districts under
under the terms
and
provisions
of this chapter.
(B) Section 17-5 of said Chapter 17, entitled "Admin-
istrative Assistant to the Environmental Preser-
vation Review Board" is hereby repealed and the
following is hereby substituted in its place:
"Section 17-5. Heritage Conservation Officer
The Heritage Conservation Officer, as provided in
Section 62-75 of. Article VII of Chapter 62 of this
Code shall be responsible to assist the Heritage
Conservation Board and to carry cut the following
duties:
(1) Serve as secretary to the board. The
appointee shall attend all meetings of the
board and maintain a record of the procee-
dings of the board, showing its action on
each application. The appointee shall sche-
dule and provide notification of environmen-
tal preservation review board meetings to
applicants and other department and agency
representatives.
(2) Upon receipt of a proper application for tree
removal within the designated environmental
preservation districts, review such applica-
tion, which may include a field check of the
site and referral to other departments or
agencies as necessary to determine any
adverse effect upon the general public
welfare.
(3) Paintain and update an official map delinea-
ting environmental preservation districts and
a photographic documentation of all official
designated sites.
(4) Mork with other city departments and commu-
nity environmental groups as reto protect
and preserve the natural environment through
public education and encouraging sound envir-
onmental policies.
(5} Ensure that notice of the application for a
tree removal permit is mailed to adjacent
property owners.
(6) Prepare summary reports of all decisions on
tree removal permit applications. The report
shall Lx iefly summarize the conditions and
criteria for tree removal and the decision of
3
� ✓ ` `.k 2 L
aiv
a
the heritage conservation officer.
(7) Transmit to the building and zoning inspec-
tion department a copy of the tree removal
certificate of approval and a copy of the
approved plan. A tree removal permit shall
be issued by the building and zoning inspec-
tion department as required.
(C) All references to the term "Environmental
Preservation Review Board" in Sections 17-6,
17-7, 17-8, 17-12, and 17-14 of the Code of
the City of Pliami as amended, are hereby
repealed and the term "heritage Conservation
Board" is hereby substituted therefor.
(D) All references to the term "Administrative
Assistant to the Environmental Preservation
Review Board" in Section 17-8 and 17-12 of
said Chapter 17 are hereby repealed and and
the torm "Heritage Conservation Officer" is
hereby substituted therefor.
Section 2. The effective date for such amendments
shall coincide with the date of official appointment of all
members to the proposed heritage Conservation Board, not to
exceed 180 days from the final approval of these amendments.
Section 3. That all ordinances, code sections or
parts of laws in conflict herewith are hereby repealed inso-
far as they are in conflict.
Section 4. Should any part or provision of this
Ordinance be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction
to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the
Ordinance as a whole.
PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this
day of _ April , 1982.
2?nd
4
";427
NOTICE Is HEAFhy nivc:jj _, i
PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING BY TITLE
ONLY this 27th day of May , 1982.
Maurice A FeYre
MAURICE A. FERRE, Mayor
ATT
C_-V 03 C3
RAL G. ONGIE, City Clerk
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
i
JtO,LL E . MAXWELL
Assistant City Attorney
APPROVED AS To FORM AND CORRECTNESS:
GEORgE F . KNOX , JR .
City-} Attorney
5
0
MIAMI REVIEW
AND DAILY RECORD
Published Daily except Saturday, Sunday and
Legal Holidays
Miami, Dade County, Florida,
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF DADE:
Before the undersigned authority personally eppeeted
Dianna Stuver, who on oath says that she is the Assistant to
the Publisher of the Miami Review and Daily Record, a daily
(except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) newspaper,
published at Miami In Dade County, Florida; that the attached
copy of advertisement, being a Legal Advertisement of Notice
In the matter of
City of Miami
Re: ORDINANCE NO. 9427
X X X
In the Court,
was published in said newspaper In the issues of
June 9, 1982
Allient further says that the said Miami Review and Daily
Record Is a newspaper published at Miamiin
sold Dade County,
been
Florida, and that the said newspaper
continuously published in said Dade County. Florida, each day
(except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) and has been
entered as second class mail matter at the post office in
Miami in said Dade County, Florida, for a period of one year
next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of
advertisement: and affiant further says that she has neither
paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount,
rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this
advertisement tot publication in the said newspaper.
111t;iti�rrt;.
.tiV t r:
Sworn} to and subs, rtbed before me this
9th Ju11a A.D. 19 8.2
�qy o1 . > i, •'Yet
Tagre Franco
Notary Pupflc, Stdte of Florida at Large
(SEAL) ' �.�`
My CommisstOrY�kr1>e31Dee.O,2t, 1985.
MR 131
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pur-
uant to an Order or Final
tent dated MAY 14, 1982
ntered in Civil Action CaseTa.
2.1621 of the Circuit Court of the
leventh Judicial Circuit in and
)r Dade County, Florida, wherein
•ARNEGIE CONSTRUCTION
:dMPANY, a Florida corporation,
isintiff, and FRANK PETTY,
lefendant, I will sell to the highest
nd best bidder for cash in the
)bby at the South front door of
1e Dade County Courthouse in
flami, Dade County, Florida at
1:00 o'clock A.M., on the 16 day
t JUNE, 1582, the following
ascribed property as set forth in
aid Order or Final Judgment, to
lit:
Lot 20, Block 2 of HIGHAiDGE
PARK, per Plat thereof,
recorded In Plat Book 17 all
Page 5 of the Public Records
of Dade County, Florida;
together with the improve•
ments thereon. Also known
as 2351 N.E. 56th Street,
Miami, Florida.
Dated this 1 day of JUNE, 1982.
RICHARD P. BRINKER
Clerk of said Circuit Court
;ircuit Court Seat)
by C. STAFFORD
Deputy Clerk
.ttorney for Plaintiff
turton Engels
5 W. Flagier St.
Iliami, Fla. 33130
73.4713
First publication of this notice
n the 2 day of June, 1982.
12.9 MB2-060288
NO`i"Ift roF SALE
PUNSUAN? t6 C 4APTEh 4f3
N THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR
DADE COUNTY
CIVIL ACTION NO.81.186
Section 10
OASIS, A CONDOMINIUM ASSO-
CIATION, INC.
Plaintiff
-vs-
URIEL OOUENDO alkla URIEL
OUENDO, a single Mali
Defendant
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pur-
suant to an Order or Final Judg-
ment dated MAY 13, 1982, and
entered in Civil Action Case No.
81.186 of the Circuit Court of the
Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and
for Dade County, Florida, wherein
OASIS, A CONDOMINIUM ASSO•
CIATION, INC. Plaintiff and URIEL
OOUENbO We URIEL OUENDO,
a single Irian Defendant, I will sell
to the highest and best bidder for
cash in the lobby at the South
front door of the Dade County
Courthouse In Miami, Dade Coun.
ty, Florida at 11:00 o'clock A.M.
on the 16 day of JUNE, 1982, the
following described property as
set forth in said Order or Final
Judgment, to wit:
NOTICE OF SALE
PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 45
J THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR DADE
COUNTY
CIVIL ACTION NO.82.1740
Section 30
LAGLER FEDERAL SAVINGS
AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF
MIAMI
Plaintiff
vs
CRAIG A. CARAGLIOR, et at.
Defendants
AM FRANK
Crossplaintiff
vs
CRAIG A. CARAGLIOR and
BERNADETTE J. CARAGLIOR,
his wife
Crossdefendants
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pur-
uarit to an Order or Final Judg-
ient dated MAY 13, 1982, and
ntered in Civil Action Case No.
2.1740 of the Circuit Court of the
eventh Judicial Circuit in and
;r Dade County, Florida, wherein
LAGLER FEDERAL SAVINGS
ND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF
UAM1, Plaintiff, and CRAIG A.
•ARAGLIOR, et al., Defendants,
nd SAM FRANK, Crossplaintiff,
nd CRAIG A. CARAGLIOR and
ERNADETTE J. CARAGLIOR, his
tife, Crossdefendants, 1 will sell
:) the highest and best bidder for
ash in the lobby at the South
ont door of the Dade County
.ourthouse in Miami, Dade Coun-
, Florida at 11:00 o'clock A.M.,
n the 16 day of JUNE, 1982, the
otiowing described property as
et forth in said Order or Final
udgment, to wit:
I
su.
mt
an
81•
tht
tot
UN
Cl
Pit
an
lit
De
an
lot
IN
Mi
11
of
de
so
wi
Le
Unit No. G•7 of OASIS NUM-
BER TWO, A CONDOMINIUM,
according to the Declaration
Al
of Condominium thereof,
St
recorded in Official Records
32
Book 9236 at Page 292 of the
Cr
Public Records of Dade Coun-
44
ty, Florida.
or
DATED this 1 day of JUNE, 1982. 6[
RICHARD P. BRINKER _
Clerk of said Circuit Court
(Circuit Court Seal) i
by C. Stafford it
Deputy Clerk
Attorney for Plaintiff
Edward S. Polk
6520 N. Andrews Ave.
Fort Lauderdale, Fla. 33134
944.2926 B
First publication of this notice
on the 2 day of June, 19B2.
612.9 M82-060279
NOTICE OF SALE
PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 45
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR DADE
COUNTY
CIVIL ACTION NO. 81.16874
SECTION 26
LANDMARK CONCRETE, INC., a
Florida corporation,
Plaintiff
-vs-
ALFREDO MUJICA and BERTA
MUJICA, his wife, of al.,
Defendants
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pur-
suant to an Order or Final Judg-
ment dated MAY 10, 1982, and
entered in Civil Action Case No.
81.16874 of the Circuit Court of
the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and
for Dade County, Florida, wherein
LANDMARK CONCRETE, INC., a
Florida corporation, Plaintiff, and
ALFREDO MUJICA and BERTA
MUJICA, his wife, at al., Defend-
ants, 1 will sell to the highest and
best bidder for cash in the lobby
at the South front door of the Dade
County Courthouse in Miami, Dade
County, Florida at 11:00 o'clock
A.M., on the 16th day of JUNE,
Condominium Parcel des, 1982, the following described prop-
ignated 9712 NW 5lh Lane, erty as set forth in said Order or
Miami, Florida, located in Final Judgment, to wit:
Building No. 54, of EAST WIND
LAKE VILLAGE CONDOMIN-
IUM together with an
undivided interest as Tenant
in Common in the Common
Etsrr,6ssN and the Limited
Common Elements appur•
tenant thereto accorai,:q., to
the Declaration of Condomin-
ium thereof as recorded in Q.R.
Book 9546, at Page 600, and
Condominium Plan Book 55,
al Page 1, and amended by
Amendment No. 1 as recorded
under Clerk's File No.
77R3775, Amendment No. 2
as recorded under Clerk's File
No, 77R-30889, Amendment
.No: 3 as recorded under
'unr+rur taaN1S F MS. tli.'Dal
Lot 7, Block 5, MAYSLAND (i
SUBDIVISION, according to
the Plat thereof as recorded
In Plat Book 10 all Page 1 of F
the Public Records of Dade
County, Florida, alkfs 2000 9
Northwest 15th Street, Miami, li
Florida, f)
Daiad this 1st day of June, 1982.
RICHARD P. BRINKER
Clerk of said Circuit Court
(Circuit Court Seai)
by Suzanne Rupena
Deputy Clerk
Attorney for Plaintiff
CHAD P. PUGATCH, ESO.
Cooper, Sh4ha0y, Frazier A Pugatch
,��ySs.Fust_SittrtlJA61.�A1�YAtf} ._..
rr
June 30, 1962
Mr. Ray Reid
Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners
73 West Flagler Street, Rm #240, 2nd Floor
Miami, Florida
Dear Mr. Reid:
Enclosed please find a copy of ordinance No. 9422, 9423, 9424,
9425, 9426 and 9427, in connection with the Heritage Conservation
Board.
Would you kindly acknowledge receipt of same by affixing your
signature to the enclosed copy of this letter and return to this
office for our files.
Thank you.
RECEIVED BY
DATE: G -3U- irY
MHgl
Encl.a/s
very truly yours,
Matty Hirai
Acting City Clerk
R A, Ni G C)`,
C+h C1f
M 47T ) E,
DIN '\ C!i�
Rot-.--- E 1 .;
Geo•f . E.
r.. t
F,o•; . F. .
MICROFII M D1%
I All
By: \->'�& 'tc k-a /A :20't�—
Deput CifC rk
Off ICE OFgHE On CLERK Crtti Hall .' 35Vj Pan Amerman Dri.e / Miam,, Fioride 33133
Howard V. Gary May 5, 1982
City Manager
Revisions to Heritage Conservation
r.7 Ordinance for 2nd Reading
Jose6j W. McManus
Acting Director
Planning Department
The City Commission approved the Heritage Conservation ordi-
nance on 1st Reading, April 22, 1982, with the exception of
a motion that would give the property owner the final decision
over demolition of an historic structure. In attempting to
draft language to reflect such a change in the ordinance, we
have realized that several recently approved zoning district
regulations would be in direct conflict with a literal inter-
pretation of the motion (see attached exerpts from C-2A, MXD,
and SPD-5). These ordinances reflect an established City
Commission policy that when a property owner voluntarily
accepts a bonus for historic preservation, he must give up
the right to demolish the structure for which he received
special benefits. Therefore, we have submitted the following
language which will resolve the conflict with existing regu-
lations and preserve what we believe to be the intent of the
City Commission.
(8)(b) Demolition of Existing Improvements
"1. The Board shall have authority to deny a demoli-
tion permit only where such authority is provided
within applicable zoning district regulations as
a result of granting special incentives for
preservation of an historic improvement, such as
but not limited to transfer of development rights,
floor area ratio bonus, and special exceptions
for setbacks, lot coverage, parking, etc."
Several paragraphs related to denial of a demolition permit
have been deleted from the ordinance for 2nd reading. These
were previously numbered: (8) (a) , (8) (b) , (8) (c) , and (8) (d)
2.a. On page 21, paragraph 2: "No decision of the Board
shall result in an unreasonable economic hardship for the owner."
should be inserted after the 2nd sentence, in order to replace
a similar statement deleted in (8)(a) of the previous ordinance.
JWM : JAM : dr
ATTACHMENTS
9425
9426
9427
C-2A
Ordinance 9360
December 15, 1982
11. Add a new sub -section (5), Section 9 Floor Area
Premiums to read as follows:
(5) The floor area ratio may be increased by .25
for that portion of a property designated
historic by the City of Miami Commission
when the historic structure on that site is
preserved in place or moved to an approved site
within or adjacent to the C-2A district. The
historic structure shall be preserved, reha-
bilitated or restored according to the
Secretary of the Interior's Standards for
Historic Preservation Projects.
The floor area in said historic structure
shall not count in permitted floor area as
per Section 8 of this district. Floor area
development rights for anv designated historic
prQ.perty may be transferred to another property
within the C-2A District provided that a record-
able instrument evidencing the transfer of
development rights shall be filed as a matter
of record in the Building Department of the
Citv of Miami and the Circuit Court of Dade
County, Florida. The floor area bonus
described above may be transferred as a Dart
of the development rights of designated
historic property. No demolition permit shall• •
be issued for said historic structure i
so long as any development constructed through
the bonus provision of transferred development
rights is in existence ,
---------------------------------------------------------------
l/ Words stricken through shall be deleted. Underscored words
constitute the amendment proposed. Remaining provisions
are now in effect and remain unchanged. Asterisks indicate
omitted and unchanged material. 5
_ 426
9360 I
MY* 1, MXD- 2 , :4XD- 3
Ordinance 9387
March 16, 1982
Section 12 HISTORIC PRESERVATION
(1) Historic sites and structures so designated by
the City Commission shall be eligible for trans-
fer of development rights (paragraph 2 of this
Section) and floor area ratio bonuses (Section 3)
subject to the following:
a) Wherever the configuration of the development
site will reasonably permit, the historic
structures shall be preserved in place.
b) Where redevelopment cannot be carried out with
the structure in place, it may be moved at the
owner's expense to a site approved by the
Planning Department.
c) The historic structure shall be preserved,
rehabilitated or restored at the owner's
expense according to the Secretary of the
Interior's Standards for Historic Preservation
Projects.
(2) Floor area development rights for any designated
historic property may be transferred to another
property within the MXD, R-CB, or R-Cl districts
provided that a recordable instrument evidencing
the transfer of development rights shall be filed
as a matter of record in the City of Miami Building
Department and the Circuit Court of Dade County,
Florida. The floor area bonus described in
Section 3 may be transferred as a part of the
development rights. In no case, however, shall
the transferred development rights result in more
than a total increase of FAR 1.0 for the receiving
property.
U) The floor area within a designated histroict struc-
ture shall not be counted in any calculation of
( floor area ratio.
C4) No demolition permit shall be issued for a designated!
i
' historic structures so long as any development con-
structed through the bonus provisions or transferred
development rights is in existence.
I
SPD-5
Approved 1st Reading
Arril 22, 1982
safety standards for compact automobiles;
(e) that parking and service areas are adequately
screened trem view of adjacent properties;
( f) that all signs, lighting fixtures, landscaping and
other appurtenant elements are suitable for the
historic character of the site and compatible with
the surrounding area; and
(g) that such plans are in accord with the intent and
purpose of this district and to the benefit of the
general public.
'.(4) The 'Urban Development Review Board shall not approve ,
proposals for demolition or moving of historically sig-
nificant buildings unless:
(a) it has held a public hearing on such proposal with
notice of the time and place of such hearing
published in a.newspaper of general circulation
and posted on the site a minimum of thirty (30)
days in advance; -and
(b) it finds that failure to grant approval would
result in an unreasonable or undue economic hard-
ship for the property owner.
(5) Nothing in this Section shall be construed to prevent
the ordinary maintenance or repair of any improvement
which does not involve a change in exterior appearance
or to prevent ordinary maintenance of landscape fea-
tures. c^or the purpose of remedying emergency condi-
tions, determined to be imminently dangerous to life,
health or property, nothing contained herein shall pre-
vent the making of any temporary construction, recon-
struction, demolition or other repairs to an improve-
ment, landscape feature, or site in an SPD-5 district
pursuant to an order of a government agency or a court
of cemo_etent jurisdiction, provided that only such work
as is reasonably necessary to correct the hazardous
condition may be carried out.
Section 8. That all Ordinances, Code Sections or
parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed
insofar as thev are in conflict.
Section 9. . Should any part or provision of this
Ordinance be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction
to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the
Ordinance as a whole.
PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this day of
, 1982.
PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING BY TITLE
I
5
9421
Howard V. Gary May 5, 1982
City Manager
Revisions to Heritage Conservation
r.7 Ordinance for 2nd Reading
Jose6j W. McManus
Acting Director
Planning Department
The City Commission approved the Heritage Conservation ordi-
nance on 1st Reading, April 22, 1982, with the exception of
a motion that would give the property owner the final decision
over demolition of an historic structure. In attempting to
draft language to reflect such a change in the ordinance, we
have realized that several recently approved zoning district
regulations would be in direct conflict with a literal inter-
pretation of the motion (see attached exerpts from C-2A, MXD,
and SPD-5). These ordinances reflect an established City
Commission policy that when a property owner voluntarily
accepts a bonus for historic preservation, he must give up
the right to demolish the structure for which he received
special benefits. Therefore, we have submitted the following
language which will resolve the conflict with existing regu-
lations and preserve what we believe to be the intent of the
City Commission.
(8)(b) Demolition of Existing Improvements
"1. The Board shall have authority to deny a demoli-
tion permit only where such authority is provided
within applicable zoning district regulations as
a result of granting special incentives for
preservation of an historic improvement, such as
but not limited to transfer of development rights,
floor area ratio bonus, and special exceptions
for setbacks, lot coverage, parking, etc."
Several paragraphs related to denial of a demolition permit
have been deleted from the ordinance for 2nd reading. These
were previously numbered: (8) (a) , (8) (b) , (8) (c) , and (8) (d)
2.a. On page 21, paragraph 2: "No decision of the Board
shall result in an unreasonable economic hardship for the owner."
should be inserted after the 2nd sentence, in order to replace
a similar statement deleted in (8)(a) of the previous ordinance.
JWM : JAM : dr
ATTACHMENTS
9425
9426
9427
Howard V. Gary March 11, 1982 r!LE
City Manager
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - CHAPTER 17 OF
THE CITY CODE OF MIAMI - DELETING
AND ADDING NEW SECTIONS 17-4 & 17-5
i ez- es COMMISSION AGENDA - March 25, 1982
Director PLANNING AND ZONING AGENDA
Planning & Zoning Boards
Administration Department
The Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of February 17, 1982,
Item #5(c), following an advertised Hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB
14-82 by a 6 to 0 vote (2 members absent) RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of amending
Chapter 17 ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION of the Miami City Code by deleting
Section 17-4, Environmental Preservation Review Board, and substituting a
new Section 17-4 Heritage Conservation Board; deleting Section 17-5 Adminis-
trative Assistant to'Environmental Preservation Review Board and substituting
Conservation Officer, and substituting all other references to Environmental
Preservation Review Board with the Heritage Conservation Board.
An ORDINANCE to provide for this Ordinance Amendment has been prepared by
the City Attorney's Office and submitted for consideration of the City
Commission. _
AEPL:mo
cc: Law Department
Planning Department recommendation: