The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutO-09423ORDINANCE NO. 94 n 3 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 6871, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE: FOR THE' CITY OF MIAMI BY ADDING A NE44 ARTICLE XXI-7 HISTORIC CONSERVA- TION: RESIDFNTIA1,-OFFICE, SPECIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT (SPD-5); PROVIDING FOR INTENT, PRESERVATION OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES, EFFECT OF THE; SPECIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT, CRITERIA, USE REGULATIONS, LIMITATIONS ON USES, AREA, YARDS, HEIGHT, LOT COVERAGE, LANDSCAPING FLOOR AREA RATIOS, OFF-STREET PARKING, AND SITE AND DEVELOPMENT APPRO- VAL; BY REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES, CODE SECTIONS OR PARTS THEREOF IN CONFLICT AND CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of March 17, 1982, Item 1(b), following an adver- tisetl hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 16-82 by a 7 to 0 vote, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of an amendment to Ordinance No. 6871, as hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, the City Commission after careful considera- tion of this matter, deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami and its inhabitants to grant this amendment, as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI , FLORI DA : Section 1. Ordinance No. 6871, as amended, the Compre- hensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, is hereby amended by adding a new Article XXI-7 Historic Conserva- tion: Residential -Office Special Overlay District (SPD-5); providing for intent, preservation of historic structures, effect of the special overlay district, criteria, use regulations, yards, height, lot coverage, landscaping, floor area ratios, off-street parking, and development plan approval, to read as follows; Section 1: INTENT It is here -by declared as a matter of public policy that the protection, enhancement, and perpetuation of places of sig- nificance in the historical, cultural, archeological, aes- thetic and architectural heritage of Miami are of special and substantial public interest in protection of the health, prosperity and welfare of the people of Miami. Therefore, SPD-5 Heritage Conservation: Residential -Office Special Overlay Districts are intended to promote preservation of historically significant buildings and their grounds by pro- viding for: economically productive adaptive uses; greater flexibility to permit development in an orderly manner con- sistent with the special historic significance and visual character of such buildings and grounds; and safeguards against unnecessary destruction of the special historic significance and visual character of such buildings and grounds. Section 2: EFFECT OF THE SPECIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT (1) This district is superimposed over existing zoning districts and modifies those zoning districts to the extent indicated by the regulations set forth herein. (2) All other zoning regulations and procedures not speci- fically modified by this regulation shall be in full force and effect. Section 3: CRITERIA The SPD-5 overlay district may be superimposed over single lots or larger areas which contain buildings and other improvements which shall have significant character, interest or value as part of the historical, cultural, archeological, aesthetic, or architectural heritage of the city, state, or nation and which shall meet one or more of the following criteria: (1) is associated in a significant way with the life of a person important in the past; or (2) is the site of an historic event with significant effect upon the community, city, state, or nation; or (3) exemplifies the historical, cultural, political, econo- raic, or social trends of the community; or (4} portrays the environment in an era of history charac- terized by one or more distinctive architectural styles; or (5) embodies those distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style, or period, or method of construc- tion; or (6) is an outstanding work of a prominent designer or builder; or (7) contains elements of design, detail, materials or c.raf_tmanship of outstanding quality or which represent a significant innovation or adaptation to the South Florida environment; or (3) by being part of or related to a subdivision, park, environmental feature, or other distinctive area, should be developed or preserved according to a plan based on a historic, cultural or architectural motif; or 2 9423 protection, enhancement, and perpetuation of places of sig- nificance in the historical, cultural, archeological, aes- thetic and architectural heritage of Miami are of special and substantial public interest in protection of the health, prosperity and welfare of the people of Miami. Therefore, SPD-5 Heritage Conservation.: Residential -Office Special Overlay Districts are intended to promote preservation of historically significant buildings and their grounds by pro- viding for: economically productive adaptive uses; greater flexibility to permit development in an orderly manner con- sistent with the special historic significance and visual character of such buildings and grounds; and safeguards against unnecessary destruction of the special historic significance and visual character of such buildings and grounds. Section 2: EFFECT OF THE SPECIAL OVERLAY DCSTRICT (1) This district is superimposed over existing zoning districts and mo(lifies those zoning districts to the extent indicated by the regulations set forth herein. (2) All other zoning regulations and procedures not speci- fically modified by this regulation shall be in full force and effect. Section 3: CRITERIA The SPD-5 overlay district may be superimposed over single lots or larger areas which contain buildings and other improvements which shall have significant character, interest or value as part of the historical, cultural, archeological, aesthetic, or architectural heritage of the city, state, or nation and which shall meet one or more of the following criteria: ( 1) is associated in ,3 significant way with the life of a person important in the past; or (2) is the site of an historic event with significant effect upon the community, city, state, or nation; or (3) exemplifies the historical, cultural, political, econo- mic, or social trends of the community; or (4) portrays the environment in an era of history charac- �rized by one or more distinctive architectural :yles; or ►bodies those distinguishing characteristics of an -chitectural style, or period, or method of construc- _on; or an outstanding work of a prominent designer or i ilder; or )ntains elements of design, detail, materials or .af_tmanship of outstanding quality or which represent significant innovation or adaptation to the South Lorida environment; or being part of or related to a subdivision, park, Zvironmental feature, or other distinctive area, lould b" rl,�vnl nnnrl r-,r nrocnrvr,(l ar-r-nrrl i ran Fr) A n1 an lsed on (9) because of its prominence or spatial. location, con- trasts of siting, age, or scale, is an easily identi- fiable visual feature of a nei(h borhood or the city and contributes to the distinctive quality or identity of such neighborhood or the city; or (10) has yielded, or may be_ likely to yield, archeological information important in pre -history or history. Section 4: USE REGULATIONS No building or structure, or part thereof_, shall be erected, altered, or used, or land or water used, in whole or in part, for other than one or more of the fallowing specified uses: (1) ,Any use permitted in the underlying zoning district. (2) Office for the conduct of real estate, mortgage finan- cing (but not including savings and loans, banks, and _ similar financial institutions), accountants, tax con- sultants, engineers, dental or medical, or office of other professions or businesses, not involving sale or handling of merchandise on the premises, subject to the provisions of Sections 5 and 7 below. (3) Retail sales of items related to local history and his- toric preservation including, but not limited to an- tiques, art, and handicrafts; not exceeding 700 square feet in floor area and subject to the provisions of Section 5 and 7 below. Section 5: LIMITATIONS ON USES Any use permitted in Section 4, items (2) or (3) shall only be permitted within a structure which meets the criteria for historic significance in Section 3 above and which was existing at the time that the SPD-5 district was super- imposed. Section 6: AREA, YARDS, HEIGHT, LOT COVERAGE, FLOOR AREA RATIO, LANDSCAPING, OFF-STREET PARKING (1) Any building existing at the time that the SPD-5 dis- trict is superimposed shall be permitted to be repaired, restorer), structurally altered or changed to any use permitted in SPD-5, notwithstanding the provi- sions of ARTICLE XXVIII, Section l: NON -CONFORMING BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES; ARTICLE XXIII: OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING; and any provisions of the under- lying zoning district pertaining to landscaping and open areas. Ancillary structures, such as fences, walls, parking, and access drives, needed to serve such existing buildings shall likewise be permitted, subject to Site and Development Plan Approval in Section 7. (2) Additions to existing buildings and erection of new buildings shall be subject to the provisions of ARTICLE XXVIII, Section 1: NON -CONFORMING BUILDINGS AND STRUC- TURES; ARTICLE XXIII : OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING; and all provisions of the underlying zoning district pertaining to area, yards, height, lot coverage, floor area ratio, landscaping, and off-street parking. N 942 Section 7: SITE AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL (l) No person shall carry out or cause to he carried out any of the following actions within an SPD-5 district without first obtaining site and dcvelopment plan approval from the Urban Development Review Board: (a) Changes in exterior appearance of an existing structure by additions, reconstruction, remode -- ling, or maintenance involving change in color, form, teXtore, or materials; or (h) Construction, erection, or installatiOn of new structures or landscape features; or (c) Demolition or moving, in whole or in part, of existing 8trUctur.es: or (d) Removal, relocation, concealment, or effective destruction by damage of any existing landscape features or archeological site,, especially de- signated as significant within an SPD-5 district. (2) 1'he Urban Development Review Board shall hold a publ is hearing with full notice being given at applicant's expense (minimum fee of $2.50.00) pursuant to 662-55 (1) (2) (3) and (4) of the. City Code, within thirty days (30) of receipt of a complete set of site and development plans including a full description of the proposed work, such as detailed drawings and Specifications, samples, photographs, or any other documentation requested by the Board. The Board may approve the plans as submitted, approve the plans with specified modifications and conditions, or deny the proposed work. Appeals from such decisions may he made to the City Commission. This 30 day time limitation may he extended at any time by written consent of thee property owner or his authorized agent. (3) The Ur. ban Deve1.opme.nt Review Board shall approve site and development plans nnly if finds: (a) that such plans are in accord with the I;, S. Secretary_ of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation; (b) that such plans will not cause undue adverse impacts on the surrounding area in terms of compatibility with adjacent land uses, vehicular ingress and egress, pedestrian safety and convenience, parking, public utility and services, lighting, noise, or other po- tentially adverse impacts on adjacent residential areas; (c) That not less than two-thirds (2/3) of the number of parking spaces that would ordinarily be required for a new structure of equivalent use and floor area are provided either on -.site or at a remote location within hot) feet of the suhject site.; (d) that the location and arrangement of parking and access -drive,-, arc compatible with special histoic integrity and visualcharacter+r of the site; and that. the spacing and dimensions of such parking and access drives provide at least minimum (continued on page 5) 4 94213 safety standards for compact automobiles; (e) that parking and service areas are adequately screened from view of adjacent properties; (f) that all signs, lighting fixtures, landscaloing and other appurtenant elements are suitable for the historic character of the site and compatible with the surrounding area; and (9) that such plans are in accord with the intent and purpose of this district and to the be Lief it of the general public. (4) The Urban Development Review Board shall not approve proposals for demolition or moving of historically sig- nificant buildings unless: (a) it has held a public hearing on such proposal with notice of the time and place of such hearing published in a newspaper of general circulation and posted on the site a minimum of thirty (30) days in advance; and (b) it finds that failure to grant approkral would result in an unreasonable or undue economic hard- ship for the property owner. (5) Nothing in this Section shall be construed to prevent the ordinary maintenance or repair of any improvement which does not involve a change in exterior appearance or to prevent ordinary maintenance of landscape fea- tures. For the purpose of remedying emergency condi- tions, determined to be imminently dangerous to life, health or property, nothing contained herein shall pre- vent the making of any temporary construction, recon- struction, demolition or other repairs to an improve- ment, landscape feature, or site in an SPD-5 district pursuant to an order of a government agency or a court of competent jurisdiction, provided that only such work as is reasonably necessary to correct the hazardous condition may be carried out. Section 8. That all Ordinances, Code Sections or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed insofar as they are in conflict. Section 9. Should any part or provision of this Ordinance be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the sane shall not affect the val i:iity of the Ordinance as a whole. PASSL•'D ON FIRST READING 13Y TITLE ONLY this 22nd day of Apri 1 , 1982. PASSEp AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING BY TITLE � 5 9423 ONLY this 27th day of May , 1982. Maurice A. Ferro MARICE A. FERRE, Mayor ATTESTS: ALPfi .ty Clerk PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: I , JOEL E. MAXWELL Assistant City Attorney APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: V. .. GEORGE F. KNOX, JR. 1 City Attorney — MiAMI REVIEW AND DAILY RECORD Published Daily except Saturday. Sunday and Legal Holydays Miami. Dade County. Florida STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF DADE: Before the undersigned authority personally appeared e is the Assistant 10 the PublisherDiannar. who on oath says that hDaily Record. a daily (except Saturday. Sunday and Legal Holidays) newspaper. published at Miami in Dade County, Fllorride„1S at the of tact ce ached copy of advertisement, being a Leg al in the molter of Citl of 101iami Re - ORDINANCE No. 9423 S `S X Court, In the was published in said newspaper {n the issues of ,Tune 9r 1982 Affiant further says ttthe said Miami iiMiama i Review w and Daily Record is n that pe published has heretofore been Florida. and that the said dDade newspaper contintoSeturdaylrSu day and Dade s)oand has hbeen (excep entered as second class mail matter at t eiodool ofne yeafice n Miami in said Dade County. Florida. for a Pe next preceding the first publication of the attached copy or has neither advertrsemenk and allie rson. firm oer r corporetions that e any discount. paid nor promised any pe advertisement for opublication Inrefnd rtheesaidrnewspaper upupose of nng t is `\tttltttffll,r `\, ErwQrlltq Jribsubscribed before me This 82 9t11 `G`• jdne A.D 19 ddy , ' Terrie Franco t cr. ' Notary Public. State of Florida at Large (SEAL) My ComtjjsSipn,expires Dec. 21, 1985, 45 THE QUIT ADE MIN MiE 'EN net 1 1, eys and ure ind Vo. the ind On 'IN nd iIE 3.1 rat he de de ck 12, ty at H D ig d tf e a NOTICE IS HEREEW -,IVEN pur• suant to an Order ( at Judg• ment dated MAY 14. fl2, and entered in Civil Acti(.., Gase, No. 82.7621 of the Circuit 0),jrt of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Floi ilia, wherein CARNEGIE CONt TRUCTION COMPANY, a Florida _ irporation, Plaintiff, and FRAN,' PETTY, Defendant, I will sell to the highest and best bidder for cash in the lobby at the South front door of the Dade County Courthouse in Miami, Dade County, Florida at 11:00 o'clock A.M., on the 16 day of JUNE, 1982, the following described property as set forth in said Order or Final Judgment, to wit: Lot 20, Block 2 of HiGHRIDGE PARK, per Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 17 at Page 5 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; together with the improve• manta thereon. Also known as 2351 N.E. 56th Street, Miami, Florida. Dated this 1 day of JUNE, 1982. RICHARD P. BRINKER Clerk of said Circuit Court (Circuit Court Seal) by C. STAFFORD Deputy Clerk Attorney for Plaintiff Burton Engels 25 W. Flaglar St. Miami, Fla. 33130 373.4713 First publication of this notice on the 2 day of June, 1982. 612-9 M82.060288 NOTICE OF SALE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 45 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR DADE COUNTY CiVIL ACTION NO. 82.1740 Section 30 FLAGLER FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF MIAMi Plaintiff vs CRAIG A. CARAGLIOR, et al. Defendants SAM FRANK Crossplaintiff vs CRAIG A. CARAGLIOR and BERNADETTE J. CARAGLIOR, his wife Crossdefendants NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pur- suant to an Order or Final Judg- ment dated MAY 13, 1982, and entered in Civil Action Case No. 82.1740 of the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County. Florida. wherein FLAGLER FEDERAL SAVINGS ,AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF MIAMI, Plaintiff, and CRAIG A. CARAGLIOR, et al., Defendants, and SAM FRANK, Crossplaintiff, and CRAIG A. CARAGLiOR and BERNADETTE J. CARAGLIOR, his wife, Crossdefendants, I will sell to the highest and best bidder for cash to the lobby at the South front door of the Dade County Courthouse in Miami, Dade Coun- ty, Florida at 11:00 o'clock A.M., Dn the 16 day of JUNE, 1982, the 'ollowing described property as set forth in said Order or Final Judgment, to wit: Condominium Parcel des, ignated 9712 NW 5th Lane, Miami, Florida, located in Building No. 54, of EAST WIND LAKE VILLAGE CONDOMIN IUM together with ar undivided interest as Tenani In Common in the Commor Elements and the Limited Common Elements appur tenant thereto according tc the Declaration of Condomin ium thereof as recorded in O.R Book 9546, at Page 500, anc Condominium Plan Book 55 al Page 1, and amended by amendment No. 1 as recordec under Clerk's File No 77"1& a A_ r NOTICE OF SALE PURSUANT t0 CHAPTER 45 N THE CIRCUIT COURT OF TH ELEVENTH JUDICIAL GIRCUI OF FLORIDA IN AND FOi DADE COUNTY CIVIL ACTION NO. 81.186 Section 10 JASIS, A CONDOMINIUM ASSO CIATION, INC. Plaintiff -vs. URIEL OOUENDO a/kle URIEI OUENDO, a single man Defendant NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pur suant to an Order or Final Judg rent dated MAY 13, 1982, anc 3ntered In Civil Action Case No 31.186 of the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in anc !or Dade County, Florida, wherein DASIS, A CONDOMINIUM ASSO• NATION, INC. Plaintiff and URIEL DQUENDO &We URIEL GUENDO, a single man Defendant, I will sell to the highest and best bidder for cash in the lobby at the South front door of the Dade County Courthouse in Miami, Dade Coun- ty, Florida at 11:00 o'clock A.M. on the 16 day of JUNE, 1982, the following described property as set forth in said Order or Final Judgment, to wit: Unit No. G-7 of OASIS NUM- BER TWO, A CONDOMINIUM, according to the Declaration of Condominium thereof, recorded in Official Records Book 9236 at Page 292 of the Public Records of Dade Coun- ty, Florida. DATED this 1 day of JUNE, 1982. RICHARD P. BRINKER Clerk of said Circuit Court (Circuit Court Seal) by C. Stafford Deputy Clerk Attorney for Plaintiff Edward S. Polk 6520 N. Andrews Ave. Fort Lauderdale, Fla. 33134 944.2926 First publication of this notice on the 2 day of June, 1982. 612.9 M82.060279 NOTICE OF SALE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 45 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR DADE COUNTY CIVIL ACTION NO. 81.16874 SECTION 26 LANDMARK CONCRETE, INC., a Florida corporation, Plaintiff -vs- ALFREDO MUJICA and BERTA MUJICA, his wife, of al., Defendants NOTICE iS HEREBY GIVEN pur- suant to an Order or Final Judy ment dated MAY 10, 1982, and entered in Civil Action Case No. 81.16874 of the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida, wherein LANDMARK CONCRETE, INC., a Florida corporation, Plaintiff, and ALFREDO MUJICA and BERTA MUJICA, his wife, et al., Defend- ants, I will sell to the highest and best bidder for cash in the lobby at the South front door of the Dade County Courthouse in Miami, Dade County, Florida at 11:00 o'clock A.M., on the 161h day of JUNE, 1982, the following described prop erty as set forth in said Order or Final Judgment, to wit: Lot 7, Block 5, MAYSLAND SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 10 at Page 1 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, a/k/a 2800 Northwest 15th Street, Miami, Florida, Dated this 1st day of June, 1982. RICHARD P. BRINKER Clerk of said Circuit Court (Circuit Court Seal) by Suzanne Rupena n s_ L A A 9 to tit a. 6! 1 coo June 30, 1982 Mr. Ray Reid Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners 73 West Flagler Street, Rm #240, 2nd Floor Miami, Florida Dear Mr. Reid: Enclosed please find a copy of Ordinance No. 9422, 9423, 9424, 9425, 9426 and 9427, in connection with the Heritage Conservation Board. Would you kindly acknowledge receipt of same by affixing your signature to the enclosed copy of this letter and return to this office for our files. Thank you. very truly yours, R k" PH C: C". Ge<�•r . t, I . MICROFII',' [11. Matty Hirai Acting City Clerk By h6c.�� Deput Cit Ci&k .. .a.r c, RECEIVED BY 7y�,.�!�,Ut/' ^"'•' DATE: ( - 3U - MHgl Encl.a/s }V "4j OFFICE OF JF CIT-N CfERI. , Cn� Ha!I 350:' Pan ^mericar Drive M,an,,. Flond, 33133 ' 5'4-;.:. . •.c e*u a.n: `.�, .,_... t� «, �:: k' .'r\�e.._n'" 4�aT�. � ... rS'1�,�t�., Howard V. Gary City Manager °�� oseph W. McManus Acting Director Planning Department May 5, 1982 � 11. IL: Revisions to SPD-5 for 2nd Reading As directed by the City Commission, the following revisions have been made to SPD-5 for 2nd Reading on May 27: p3. Section 4: USE REGULATIONS, paragraph (2) - banks, savings and loans, and similar financial institutions have been excluded from the interpretation of "mort- gage financing". p3. Section 4: USE REGULATIONS, paragraph (3) - retail sale of antiques, art, handicrafts and similar items has been reworded to be restricted to items related to local history and historic preservation. p4. Section 7: SITE AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL, para- graph (2) - has been amended to require notice in a newspaper of general circulation 10 days prior to the Board's decision on site plan approval. JWM:JAM:dr r g4"2 94f'2 CITY OF M►AMI, FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM To Planning Advisory Board DATE. March 4, 1982 FILE: ��t /J/��f, SUBJECT Historic Preservation Incentives W •, " FROM ose h td. McManus REFERENCES - Acting Director Planning Department ENCLOSURES. During the February 17th public hearing concerning the proposed Heritage t Conservation ordinance the Board requested that a uniform policy be established concerning the use of floor area ratio bonuses as an incen- tive for preservation of historic structures. The Department agrees with the Board that it is necessary to have a uniform policy that treats all historic property owners fairly. However, there are other types of incentives besides the FAR bonus which are equally beneficial and often more compatible with other planninq and and zoning policies. Thus, we would recommend a policy that would generally assign certain preservation incentives according to the classification of the oroperty as follows: a. Commercial or office zoning districts (C-1, C-2, C-4, C-5, C-2A, R-C, R-CA, R-CB, R-CC, I-1, MXD) - FAR .25 bonus b. High density commercial districts (C-3, CBD.-2, MXD, RC-B) - Transfer of development rights and exemptions to yard area and amenity requirements. C. Residential districts (R-1 through R-5) - change of use to office or commercial where compatible with the surrounding area (example: SPD-5 on Petit Douy and Warner House) d. Residential districts (R-1 through R-5) - change of density (units per acre) or limited FAR bonus where change of use (c) is not compatible with the surrounding area. The appropriate incentive can be provided within the overlay zoning dis- trict which is adopted for each individual historic site or district. The SPD-5 overlay zone, proposed as a separate item on the March 17th agenda, is a good example of how this process would work under an HC zoning category. The other alternative is to provide the incentive with- in the underlying zoning district regulations (for example as provided in C-2A and MXD). The latter approach is not recommended on a City-wide basis because it would be cumbersone to implement and would orevent flexibility in creating incentives tailored to the special needs of many historic properties. Jl-;M:JM:mb o 4 .? � J 1 ^f 'ice I Howard V. Gary City Manager °�� oseph W. McManus Acting Director Planning Department May 5, 1982 � 11. IL: Revisions to SPD-5 for 2nd Reading As directed by the City Commission, the following revisions have been made to SPD-5 for 2nd Reading on May 27: p3. Section 4: USE REGULATIONS, paragraph (2) - banks, savings and loans, and similar financial institutions have been excluded from the interpretation of "mort- gage financing". p3. Section 4: USE REGULATIONS, paragraph (3) - retail sale of antiques, art, handicrafts and similar items has been reworded to be restricted to items related to local history and historic preservation. p4. Section 7: SITE AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL, para- graph (2) - has been amended to require notice in a newspaper of general circulation 10 days prior to the Board's decision on site plan approval. JWM:JAM:dr r g4"2 94f'2