The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutM-82-0751Ir ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 6871, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDI-% NANCE FOR THE CITY OF MIAMI, BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF LOTS 3 THROUtH 6 INCLUSIVE, BLOCK F; RHODES AMENDED PLIft XOF NEW BISCAYNE (B-16) SUBDIVISION; BEING PROXIMATELY 3167-3173-3193 SOUTHWEST-`27TH ANUE, FROM R-4 (MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE) TO %C (RESIDENTIAL -OFFICE), AND BY �'1AKING ALL HE NECESSARY CHANGES IN THE ZONING DISTR CT MAP MADE A PART OF SAID ORDINANCE NO. 68,1, BY REFERENCE AND DESCRIPTION IN ARTICLE \III, SECTION 2, THEREOF,"BY REPEALING ALL ORDINCES, CODE SECTIONS OR PARTS THERE- OF IN CON �ICT AND CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. WHEREAS, the Miami\Zoning B6ard at its meeting of June 21, 1982, Item 11, fo�lowing an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution No. ZB 10'9-8L by a 4 to 3 vote, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of a change of zonin�,\classification, as hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, the City Commissin after careful considera- tion of this matter deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of,Miami and its inhabitants to grant this change of zoning classification as hereinafter set forth; r NOW, THEREFQRE, BE IT ORDAINED BY T',iE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: � Section,i. Ordinance No. 6871, as ameded, the Compre- hensive Zoning Ordinance for the City of Miami\ be and the same is hereby arpended by changing the zoning classi cation of Lots 3 through,b inclusive, Block F; RHODES AMENDED PL�T OF NEW BISCAYNE (B-16) Subdivision; being approximately 3�1167-3173-3193 Southwq'st 27th Avenue, from R-4 (Medium Density Mul`'ple) to R-C (Resi ential-Off ice), and by making all the necessary changes in v'he zoning district map made a part of said Ordinan a No. 6871, by,reference and description in Article III, Section 2 „thereof. 1 k Section 2. That all Ordinances, Code Sections or parts thereof in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed insofar as they are in conflict. Section 3. Should any part or provision of this Ordinance be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole. PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this day of ,1982. PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING BY TITLE ONLY this day of ,1982. MAURICE A. FEF;RE, MAYORE ATTEST: MATTY HIRAI ACTING CITY CLERK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: TERRY V.IPERCY DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED ,AS ND CORRECTNESS: . -. GEO E F. KNA, JR. CIT ATTORNEY`- ----- -2- 82- 751-- Howard V. Gary City 1111anager r relio E. Pere 9ones Director Planning and Zoning Boards Administration Der)artment 1M7_`.1-0F71= MEMORANDUM July 12, 1982 rILE djL-1 CHANGE OF ZONIt1G RECOMMENDED APPROVAL Approximately 3167-3173-3193 S.W. 27th Avenue CO"IMISSIM AGENDA - July 29, 19S2 PLANNING AND ZONING AGENDA The Fliami Zoning Board, at its meeting of June 21, 1982, Item 11, following an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution No. ZB 109-82 by a 4 to 3 vote, RECO '1ENDI.`Iu APPROVAL of a Change of Zoning Classification of Lots 3 through 6 inclusive, Block F; RHODES XIELNDED PLAT OF NEW BISCAYNE (B-16) Subdivision; being approximately 3167-3173-3193 S.W. 27th Avenue, from R-4 (Medium Density Multiple) to R-C (Residential -Office). Five objections received in the mail; eleven opponents present at meeting. Seven proponents present at the meeting. Four repl i es i n favor received in the mai 1. An ORDINANCE to provide for this Change of Zoning has been prepared by the City Attorney's Office and submitted for consideration of the City Commission. AEPL:bpm cc: La►-i Department MOTE: Planning Department recommendation: DENIAL 82-'751-� ZONING FACT SHEET LOCATION/LEGAL Approx. 3167-3173-3193 S.W. 27th Avenue Lots 3 through 6 inclusive Block F; NEW BISCAYNE AMENDED (B-16) OWNER Frances M. Stein (OWNER OF RECORD) 3167 S.W. 27th Avenue Miami, Florida 33133 Phone "443-2087 Coconut Grove Investment Corp. (OWNER OF RECORD) c/o Homero de la Torre, President 3460 S. Dixie Highway Miami, Florida 33133 Phone "446-6263 APPLICANT Joseph B. Reisman (CONTRACT TO PURCHASE) 2600 AmeriFirst Bldg. (POWER OF ATTORNEY) One S.E. Third Avenue Miami, Florida 33131 Phone ?358-2600 ZONING R-4 (Medium Density Multiple). REQUEST Change of Zoning to R-C (Residential Office). RECOi iXENDATIONS PLANt,IING DEPT. DENIAL. The requested change in zoning represents a serious intrusion into the only moderate intensity apartment district in Coconut Grove. The office use proposed is contrary to the Coconut Grove Master Plan and the City of Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and constitutes a precedent that would threaten similar zoning actions throughout this R-4 area. Offices, being more economically competitve use of land would, if this zoning change were permitted, create a speculative market for new office growth and conversion of existing apartments on 27th Avenue, Day Avenue and Tigertail Avenue. The City Commission, in rezoning the tract of land to the south of this site and Bayshore Drive, created a 100 foot deep buffer zone along Tigertail to protect against impacts on residential zoning north of Tigertail. This zoning change is in conflict with City policy to protect against office impacts in this R-4 area. 82-'751 PUBLIC WORKS No dedication is requested. This proposed zoning change does not significantly effect sanitary sewer flow. However, the continual expansion of this zoning would increase sanitary sewer flow and the necessity of rebuilding the sanitary sewer system. — ZONING BOARD Recommended A?PZOVAL on June 21, 1982 82-'751 ,r 4A MIAMI ZONING BOARD MEETING ..TUNE 21, 1982: APPROXIMATELY 3167-3173-3193 S.W. 7TH'AVENUE LOTS 3 THROUQ 6 INCLUSIVE: BLOCK F RHOrZ AMENDED PLAT OF NEW B AYNE (B-16) WE, THEINDERSIGNED, wish the peti n to change the zoning front R-4 (Medium Density Multiple) to R-C (Residential -Office) be DENIED ` /4 Name ice% TAddress -- i Legal �.Daatteo# 71... (o l tf c_/2 c' c L r� �� U�; f , -;' .'li%-�.-- •. ~S ~)i, V i I ,'�.��-•-L�t �•_, :. •'�-•�. h. � �`�G !mac ..../ .��... c �.... I � �.�� _`to. p .dry , ::c, _;w of lgaiea atAMe -- p;� Cor..:�.;::i r✓ Expires April 11, 19TA jond•d 7Ar4 JIroy Fa11 Ir.:ures,• bAiL , 1 have witnes 3d vzz' ••......• •a e � • h e • �FFIOkIGP•a��\�,, 82-751, PV ."�. . 11. Approximately 3167-3173-3193 S.W. 27th Avenue Lots 3 through 6 inclusive; Block F RHODES AMENDED PLAT OF NEW BISCAYNE (B-16) Change of Zoning from R-4 (Medium Density Multiple) to R-C (Residential -Office) Secretary filed proof of publication of Legal Notice of Hearing and administered oath to all persons testifying at this Hearing. PROPONENTS: 7 OPPONENTS: 11 Mr. Perez-Lugones: Thank you very much. Mr. Chairman. Mr. Alfonso: Let's hear from the Department, please. Mr. Whipple: Mr. Chairman, Members of the Board, the Planning Department would like to give the recommendation in two parts this evening. I'd like to give the basic recommendation and then ask Mr. Luft to briefly fill in the adopted plans with respect to Coconut Grove and the Miami Comprehensive Plan; as this request impacts those official plans of the City. We recommend denial of this item. We note that the re- quested change kn zoning represents a serious intrusion into the only moderate intensity apartment district in Coconut Grove. I call your attention to the map, and you'll note that basically we have R-4 zoning along Tigertail Avenue, both east and west of 27th Avenue. And the R-4 also continues northerly on Tigertail Avenue all the way up to and beyond Bird Road. As I mentioned,this zoning is in accord with the Coconut Grove master plan and also in accord with the City of Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plans. As you might know, the Grove area has been the subject of quite extensive planning over a number of years. We feel such a change of zoning would be quite a threat to the other R-4 zoned areas surrounding this request. We recog- nize that there is significant pressures by which to rezone land fir office development, as office development is obviously more mod or more current or more acceptable as in the economic reins than is building apartments at this point in time. This threatens, therefore, the potential - or could impact the potential resource we have with respect to our apartment development that does exist in this area. We note that, although it is not shown on this particular map, there was a rezoning on the southerly side of Bayshore, but there was also a reservation placed upon this rezoning by the City Commission that a 100' open landscape buffer be provided with that change of zoning and be restricted to only service vehicles with no primary ingress and egress from that property. Although this was not the Department's recommendation, it did serve to maintain the continuity and the intent of the zoning as it appears in this area; maintaining the R-4 character. One last comment and then Mr. Luft will wind it up. The question is often asked, as we're dealing with a site that has a commercial development on it at the present time of a gas sta- tion, if a use this, that and the other thing wouldn't be better than a gas station? And, I just want to point out to this Board that is not what we're considering here this evening. We're considering a change of zoning based upon need, based upon plans, based upon objectives of community development."These objectives are clearly stated, as Mr. Luft will follow through, so it's not June 21, 1982 Item 11 Zoning Board sz--751 �gyS�i!!L.i obi Sl:jain �t..� a matter of getting rid of a gas station and replacing it with another use. We could just as well get rid of a gas station and replace it with a proper use, that being apartments. So, I just wanted to point out that this is not a proper consideration when you're talking about a change of zoning. Mr. Luft. Mr. Luft: Thank you. Mr. Chairman, Members of the Board, I simply want to point out... Mr. Alfonso: State your name and address for the record, please. Mr. Luft: My name Jack Luft, and my office is 275 NW Second Street; City Planning Department. I wish to point out to the Board that in constructing or developing a plan for a community, one of the important objec- tives that we attempt to achieve is that of a balance. We seek to provide and assure that there remains, in this case housing, a variety of different types of densities to suit a variety of styles of income. I would draw the Board's attention to the district in brown, which is the R-4 district we're speaking of tonight. As you can see from the map, this is the only concentration of R-4 in Coconut Grove. And as such, it provides the only concentration of rental apartments, of garden apartments for this particular community. The high density apartments in the Grove over on Douglas Road were eliminated; the apartments on Dixie Highwav have been converted; and the apartments along Bayshore Drive are now in the process of being replaced by offices. We're simply suggesting to you that it is important that we maintain the R-4 district; that we do not threaten it in such a way that a zoning change could present a precedent that we would be unble to resist. Further changes to the east, to the west and to the north would simply mean threatening that concentration; that resource of moderate income rental housing that we have; the only remaining in Coconut Grove. Now, why do I suggest that it would threaten it? The Commission, as Mr. Whipple pointed out, saw to it that the coven- ant was provided on the R-C property to the south of this. This covenant provided for a 100' green buffer. It would simply be inconsistent in asmuchas the City has has established the policy that a buffer would be provided to protect a transition from the highrise R-C on Bayshore to the moderate density and even lower in- tensity residential to the north. It would be inconsistent to then jump over that buffer, as is being proposed tonight, and to rezone on the north side of Tigertail to precisely the same district that we have on Bayshore Drive. This would defeat the purpose of the buffer and simply leave us open for continued applications for R-C zoning to the north, the east and the west. To preserve the housing; to preserve the transition buffer, we are recommending that this request for a zoning change be denied and the R-4 zoning be left intact in this particular district. Thank you. Mr. Alfonso: Thank you, Mr. Luft. Mr. Campbell: Mr. Alfonso: Mr. Chairman? Yes, please. June 21, 1982 Item 11 Zoning Board 82-75 1 Mr. Campbell: Once again for the record - George Campbell, representing the Department of Public Works. We echo Mr. Luft's concern about the potential for what might be termed the domino effect northerly along 27th Avenue and possibly northeasterly along Tigertail. The area - the subject area, rather - is, of course, is zoned R-4. The sanitary sewers in that area were designed for that density; which is a certain number of dwelling units per acre. The change to R-C would significantly - the potential would be significant for an increase in the sanitary flow, which could cause a problem at a later date in that if this is continued... Mr. Alfonso: Excuse me. You're talking about the future extension. About thiLi particular application, it's a contradiction to what you said here in the fact sheets. Mr. Campbell: that. I .. Mr. Alfonso: Just a moment now. Okay. I haven't gotten to Mr. Campbell: The immediate property in question would not seriously affect the sanitary sewers in the area, okay. But, with the potential for increased rezoning - for the continuation of this rezoning with this established as a precedent, then we find that we would have a problem after a while - and it might not be too long - where it would be necessary to go in and expand the system; increase the sizes in order to accomodate the additional flow. Mr. Alfonso: Thank you, Mr. Campbell. Let's hear from the applicant. State your name and address for the record, please. Mr. Reisman: My name is Joseph Reisman. I am the appli- cant as trustee for my law firm; Rosenberg, Reisman and Glass. Our law firm seeks to use this property to construct a building primarily for ... Mr. Alfonso: Can you come to the mike, please. Mr. Reisman: I'm sorry, is the mike not working? Mr. Alfonso: Put it to you, okay? Mr. Reisman: I'm sorry. Is that better? Thank you. As I said, our law firm seeks to use this property to develope a building primarily for its own use. We are not de- velopers; we are users of this property, ourselves, if our zoning application is granted. Our firm has had a history in this community in Miami of over SO years. And we are extremely sensitive to this community, to its needs and the needs of the area and the communities with- in it. And we've attempted in developing a plan for this property; to develop a concept that would carry out that sensitivity and would protect the area, and infact enhance and improve it. It is inescapable that the site with which we are dealing is a filling station. This has been a commercial site since I was a child growing up in this community. I am a native born Miamian, and I've seen that site as everything from a diner to the present filling station that it is now. Our proposal would develope this property without any June 21, 1982 Item 11 B2--'7S1 entrance or exit whatsoever on Tigertail. The development which we propose will have no service entrance, no service exit, no entrance or exit whatsoever on Tigertail. Our development contemplates a building of approximately 30,000 square feet. We have set it back from Tigertail, at the ground level, from the corner 80 feet; and at a diagonal at the east end of the property - excuse me - perpendicular at the east end of the property, approximately 60'. The property will be buffered by landscaping which I think will be unequaled in Coconut Grove. In contact with our neighbors immediately behind us - in the condominium there - we discussed with them the possibility of lighting the area between our property and that condominum and erecting a decorative fence, which we agreed to do and gave them a letter in writing to that effect. It appear that they are con- cerned about the fact that at night this site dark, uninhabited, unoccupied and unlighted. We've agreed to give them assurances that we will light it, in meeting with them and their needs and likewise,as far a landscaping is concerned, will develope a land- scaping which will protect them. I would also indicate that at the corner of Tigertail and 27th Avenue, we're sensitive to what that location is. And we've developed what we call a piazza. If you'll notice, at ground level there is no parking on our site. That becomes an area over which people can walk; we hope to put benches and land- scaping there that will become a pleasant walkway in the neighbor- hood. Our parking is entirely underground. There will no cars parked at ground level. I think that this development will be an improvement of that site; and what I hear referred to aG an intrusion into this area, it's difficult to understand how that comment arises. When we recognize that -there now is a filling station. And if that service station meets the zoning requirements, I'm at a loss to understand it. 27th Avenue all the way from Bayshore Drive to the north city limits of Miami is a street which has commercial and office development in its entire length. And this is no.exception. In this area we have the fillinb station at our site; an Amoco sta- tion approximately two blocks north; and just opposite chat, a gro- cery store. I believe that our development could be an extreme im- provement in this area. And I don't believe that the neighbors in the noticed area of 375 feet particularly disagree with us. I have in my hand here, and would like to submit to you a petition signed by 52 of our neighbors who approve our zoning. I've marked on a map the properties on which owners have signed our petitions; marked in green surrounding our site. And I think that our effort to explain to our neighbors what we propose have been met with approval. If I may, may I submit this to the Board. I would also like to submit the photographs,which we have taken on a random day, of the filling station now in operation there. And I'd like you to glance at these and compare them with the proposed development which we suggest. It would appear to me that there are really two alter- natives to our proposal here. One is to continue the operation of this gasoline station at this site, indefinitely. The other al- ternative would be, sometime in the future, to have someone come in and erect apartment buildings on this site. In our meetings with the Staff at the City, we were informed that it would be possible perhaps to erect as many as sixty per acre•on this .site. Which, according to the mathematics which I worked out, would pro- vide somewhere between thirty-five to forty units on this site. June 21,.1982 Item 11 Zoning Board 82-'751- ie .071, ,M ON f��•J T�L f � �.t. 1 suggest that that would be a far more intense use of this pro- perty, at a critical corner, than our modest and moderate building. Our building will go up no higher than 401; which is less in height than buildings in the immediate area across the street, and no higher than the building immediately behind us. I suggest that our replacement of one of the most obnoxious of all commercial uses would be an improvement in the immediate area. I know that the hour is late, and I'm not going to waste any more time in my presentation to you. But, if there are any questions, I have the young man from our architects here to answer any questions; and I'd be pleased to answer any myself. In conclusion, I would say to you that, again, it is our intent to occupy this space. Mr. Freixas: Excuse me, all of it? Mr. Reisman: No, sir. We would occupy approximately one-half of the space; the other 15,000 feet would be available for lease to related services such as an insurance company or a title company, that sort of thing. We are seeking no variances as to setbacks, as to height, as to use. And as a matter of fact, when we first made our application, we had hoped to apply for even what was then, in our understanding at least, a more moderate zoning than R-C. We were seeking what was at that point a zoning which would not have permitted certain of the uses which are per- mitted in R-C; but that zoning has been repealed and we have had no alternative except to apply for the R-C zoning. Mr. Alfonso: Mr. Reisman, I have a question for you. Mr. Reisman: Yes, sir. Mr. Alfonso: We're talking here of a change of zoning. We're talking of your proposal for building. Do you have any plans on file - at this moment, do you have any plans of your building on file with the Department? Mr. Reisman: No sir, we do not. Mr. Alfonso: So, if you can change your intention at any time. Is that it? Mr. Reisman: That would be certainly legally permissible, but it is our intention to build this building for our use. We wouldn't be involved in this project, ourselves, were that not the case. Mr. Alfsonso: Thank you. Anyone else in favor? If not we are going to pass to the opposition. Please come to the mike those - oh you are in favor. Please come to the mike. Mr. Welsh: Good evening, my name is David Welsh. I have the property, Lot 1, which is on the opposite corner of the gas station. And, I am in favor of this project, and to site a few reasons. First of all, I've in this area for a number of years. And, approximately three years ago I left the area; I still main- tain the property. The reasons for moving were the deterioration of the area as a residential area. I have a family. This plan that these people propose, assuming that there's assurance giving that it will be that if you people do approve it, I'm in favor very strongly. 27th Avenue is commercial; there's no denying that. This two block area from Bird to Tigertail is a small pocket; and why it's maintained the zoning it has over the years, I'm at a loss. I've talked to different people in Planning. It is a June 21, 1982 Item 11 Zoning Board 82--751 . AA deteriorating area, if you just go by it and see it. I feel the class design - at which I have looked at their plans - is compatible with the Grove. I really feel that. There was another building put up recently on Bird - Aviation area; I think Lester Pancoast built it. Buildings like this I feel are very much good for the Grove, on 27th Avenue. Because 27th Avenue, I understand, is going to be four laned in time, hopefully, for the rapid transit. I would like to see - while I do have the time here - I would like to see something like we did with the Main Highway, in the Grove down along the theater and so forth. Hopefully, we can do something that's Grove style when we widen 27th Avenue. This building would enhance the area. For that, I am in favor of and not for the zoning we have now. And, I would like to see, while we are addressing the zoning change, for you people to consider in your mind for the future to take this zoning right up to Bird; at a later date. That's all I have. Thank you very much. Mr. Alfonso: Thank you. Anyone else? Please come to the mike; state your name and address for the record. Mr. Erickson: Mr. Chairman, Members of the Board, my name is Douglas Erickson. My address is 40 Morningside Drive in the Gables, on the southern part of Coconut Grove. I was the one that went around to approximately eighty- eight owners of property within 375 feet of the station. Out of the eighty-eight, fifty-two signed the petition approving it. There are approximately ten more who are also going to sign the petition. And there are approximately an additional ten that have indicated their approval, but have a thing against signing petitions; but they do not intend to oppose it. The thing that I cannot understand is the City's Planning Board and Zoning Department taking the position that there is encroachment on R-4 zoning. If that's the case, then we've had encroachment on S.W. 27th Avenue for many many years. That pro- perty has been commercial since I've been here; and that's been over twenty-five years. It is rare that we find an individual that files an application to either have property rezoned or seek a variance, requesting lesser density than what is allowed in R-C zoning. 27th Avenue, when it is four laned, is not goint to ideal for residential use. Traffic is going to be horrendous; and so are the noises. To say that it's the intent of the Planning Board to allow apartment buildings there for medium income families, I would like them to reconsider their statement; because, in order to purchase property in that area and to develope apartment build- ings there, I think the costs are going to prohibitive for the average middle income family. In order to be economically feasible, you_are going to have to achieve rentals in excess of $1500 per month; in order to have economic feasibility. Yes, if you've gone north of South Dixie Highway, it's possible to build apart- ment buildings for middle income families. I know that there is great concern amongst many people in that area for high-rises. The one concern that the property owners expressed to me is high-rises. They would much prefer to see a three-story office building than to see what's across 27th Avenue; of the equivalent of seven stories. I say seven stories because actually it's six floors but they're built up on ground the equivalent to the seventh story. The people in Schooner Port Condominum are greatly concerned about a high-rise in their.back yard. They would have loss of privacy on their pool and patio deck area; they would oe completely overshaddowed_from the sunlightin the June 21, 1982 Item 11 Zoning Board 82--'7S1 t �r q t 'L A �rn�••...•.1,'.1 ;,." ,,may-•� �•� J•f evening, or the afternoon. They have not come out and openly said yes, we will sign the petition. They are considering the two alternatives. Thus far they have indicated that they'd much pre- fer to have the office building there; certainly to provide security during the day, because there is no foot traffic in that area now. You've got a gas station. They are quite content with the idea of the entrance and exits being on 27th Avenue. They also have been reassured that one of the main concernsthat cars will be parked by the sidewalk on Tigertail Avenue, if this planning goes through - because of the sidewalk, no cars would be able_ to park -on Tigertail Avenue. The overall +concensus from the property owners there are that they are definitely in favor of a low-rise building. I have nothing else to say. Thank you. Mr. Alfonso:- Thank you. Anyone else? Let's go to the opposition. Those who are opposed - in opposition to this item can come to the mike. State your name and address for the record, please. Mr. Boen: My name is Ed Boen. I live at 4195 Braganza. I work as a real estate broker here in Coconut Grove. I don't believe this corner is deteriorating at all. There are two very successful residential apartment buildings on the northwest and southwest corners one is a condominum, one is a residential building. The resales in the condominum building are very good, and the other building is always rented, to my knowledge. My opposition is exactly as your Planning Departmenr., who the City hired to study these things, that this is a jump in zoning. It is a change in zoning. They haven't asked for the density they say they could; they simply asked for a change in zoning. We don't need this, to my knowledge. There's plenty of other commercial property in Coconut Grove that are zoned that way right now, that are not developed. I counted the other day; there's around 200, 000 square feet on line, or getting ready to come on, of property very close to this area, within one mile, that will be available. There's no reason for this zoning change. Thank you. Mr. Alfonso: Thank you. Anyone else. State your name and address for the record, please. Mr. King: My name is Dennis G. King. I am an attorney. I own the property that is in red up in the upper right-hand corner. There's two houses up there; one is a one -bedroom cottage and one is a three -bedroom two bath house. And, I must be missing the boat.somewhere if I can get $1500 a month for each of those buildings. I must be advertising in the wrong paper; and I'd Mr. Erickson to advise me where I can get that kind of a rental. I think that it's important for this Board consider that we do need residential housing in this area. Now, we're not talking about high-rise in R-4; we're talking about R-2. If you look at this map, this is where I am in this R-2. Mr. Alfonso: Please come in and talk into the microphone for the record, please. Mr. King: I'm in this R-2 zone; and this is what the ,applicant proposes to stick an office building in here. June 21, 1982 Item 11 Zoning Board 82-'7S 1 PREL11 I': Pil ITI 41 Now, I'm a lawyer and I work downtown and I go to court. And that's what lawyers do; they go to court. We're building thousands and thousands of offices downtown near the courthouse. I don't see the need for bringing the lawyers in to this area; into a residential area. Now, they've said that they are not ,going to have any access on TigertaiL. And Tigertail, as you well know, is ex- tremely overburdened at the fush hour; it i.s an escape valve for people coming from downtown. Now, if you can't get on to Tiger - tail out of this office building, and you want to go'north or east, where are you going to go? You're going to take the first street that you can get, and that is Lincoln; and you can see how it cuts into Darwin at this little intersection here.. The traffic people don't know what to do about that intersection. You go north on Darwin - they had such a torturous• right-hand turq they had a no right turn signal for quite a while and now they have a stop sign; but it makes a very sharp curve. Now Lincoln, itself, is not a full=service road. You can't get two cars back and forth, side by side there. And you're going to. have people shooting right and shooting right up toward Aviation or 22nd or wherever they want to go. Mr. Erickson mention he's got a few people signing a petition. You know he's done a very thorough job. He got me out of the shower a couple of times. And he came to the door, and he said we're going to rezone this gas station. Well, I was about to sign; I almost signed until I took it in and read it. I thought he was talking about the gas station up on 27th and Dixie. I couldn't believe he's going to put an office building here on 27th and Tigertail. Now, we've got very little R-4; we need a buffer there. This is a buffer going to a R-2. I can't understand how we're going to have any kind of a buffer if you put an office building right next to R-2. I don't see the need of it. I think it's entirely inconsistent with the zoning here; and it should be denied. Thank you. Mr. Bernstein: My name is Joel Bernstein. I live at 2841 Emathla Street. And I share the concerns of my neighbors and the Planning and Zoning Department about this proposed change. This law firm has lovely offices downtown, near the courthouse where they need to be. They're a litigating firm. And, frankly I really question their motives when they tell us that they're going to build this building. I don't think they are. I think they're doing this for development; and once they get it, as Mr. Alfonso mentioned, they have no obligation to build this building or anything that looks like it. And I would concur with the Planning Board's opinion to deny this petition. Thank you. Ms. Altshuler: My name is Thelma Altshuler. I live at Jefferson and Lincoln; 3100 Jefferson. We first heard about this a couple of weeks ago.We noticed that this had been deferred from a previous zoning —And .I say we, the Tigertail Association, became very interested in this. And with very little effort, we were able to obtain forty-one signatures of people within the area who said that they opposed this zoning change. Many of our signatures have come from 2715 Tigertail. And as we - some of us began phoning the people 'in -.the Tigertail Association. We found that there was overwhelming oppo- sition to this change. -A lot of it, of course, is in the way that the question_is presented. I' did speak to.some people who had.been June 21, 1982 Item 11 Zoning Board Pr 1-,' a' approached and had been asked building than a gas station?" fine". But, I understand that great along Tigertail. "wouldn't you rather have a pretty And they said, "yes, that would be the need for housing remains very And over the years - as we in the Tigertail Association have been coming to these meetings and to the City Commission meetings - we have been really alarmed by the kind of requests that are made with the assurance that there would never be a re- quest for a variance; and then we seem to see the kind of tragedy that unfolds or a ritual dance, perhaps, if you want to call it that. And we feel like very naive little people who are simply watching more and more commercial property come closer to where we live. So, although I don't have any pictures with green shaded in them, I do have my signatures. And I will see that the proper people get them; of those who oppose this request. Mr. Alfonso: Thank you. Ms. Post: My name is Norma Post. I live at 2061 Tiger - tail Avenue. The president of the Association, Brian Mark, wasn't able to be here; so I'm going to have to say that the Tigertail Association is entirely opposed to this. If I may sk a couple of questions on what I think is very important. Because I hope that you realize that this decision that you are making tonight is a momentous one for our area. It may be the starting point of a complete change, of complete des- truction of the north Grove. May I ask, first of all, is it actually Mr. Rosenberg - I'm sorry if I am incorrect in the name, I didn't quite hear of it - is actually purchasing this property? Mr. Reisman: May I answer the question? Mr. Alfonso: You don't have to if you don't want. She has to - she can make her presentation. Mr. Reisman: I'll be very happy to answer the question. Mr. Alfonso: Do you - okay, go ahead. Mr. Reisman: The answer to that question is yes. Ms. Post: Alright. And are you purchasing with the option - contengency that based on the rezoning of this property? Mr. Reisman: Yes, certainly. We would not buy this property could we not construct our office building for our office there. Mr. Alfonso: That's right. Ms. Post: Correct. So that you would in no way suffer if this was denied? Mr. Reisman: We would in no way suffer. We are not the owners of the property, if that's what you mean. Ms. Post: Correct. Yes. Mr. Reisman: I would suffer, however. Ms. Post: Well there's no hardship for you because you June 21, 1982 Item 11 Zoning Board 82-'75l - n! ;� An wouldn't lose anything. Mr. Reisman: Yes, I would consider it a hardship. Ms. Post: Alright. Well first of all sine � g , , e we ok set - we would be setting a precedent here. There is in fact an intrusion from point of view that there are apartment buildings there now. The gas station is the only thing there that does not, conform to this zoning, at the moment. And that was done quite a few years ago. Now we have no guarantees at all - I'm just going to not try to reinterate what has been said - but we have no guarantees that that's actually what's going to be built there. We have no guarantees that this will actually be sold to this gentleman, and therefore his plans will go through. So there are no guarantees, whatsoever. The only guarantee we have is that, if you decide to change it, it then becomes R-C; and anybody can build whatever's submitted there, whoever decides to buy it. And there's just no guarantees. And that's whu we're fearful. The traffic situation there is already horrendous. It's not a matter of future. If you could ask the Planning Board ex- actly how much traffic is now going along Tigertail Avenue, 27th Avenue, Bayshore; we already have a horrendous traffic situation. We don't need this to be added to it. As far as the - I think the crime situation that we have, rather than a deterant, this is an attraction because there is more to be gained by breaking into offices where you have expen- sive equipment than in most of the homes that we have in this area. So I think it's rather an attraction for thieves rather than a deterrent. What we see is - not only this - I think it was presented, many of the people that I've spoke to; there are a lot of people that were absent, there are absentee ownership people that are living in other areas for the summer so we couldn't contact them. I did contact a few that objected. I think I understand it, this company hired a public relations agency; and they did not point out, and the people did not under- stand. That's all they saw was that they would not have a gas station. They did not explain to them that the zoning change there mean that the people adjacent - and, like the domino theory - along there could simply request that the property be changed all along there. And I think that there are some applications already with the City to make that change all the way to Aviation. And therefore, once you change this, the people don't realize also that they might not be able to afford to live in to those apart- ments. Because, once we have the change on each of those corners, the rent will go up and you no longer will have residential, you will have commercial completely there. Even those people that may be living there, their taxes will immediately increase just as soon as that's changed that's changed to commercial. Their costs will increase; the entire area's costs will increase as soon as you build anything commercial there is always increased need for sewers, for everything. I just want to sum it up to say this point; that we're talking about eliminating a residential area right now. Now there is a need for apartments. There is a need for more living space in Coconut Grove; there's no question about that. What I'm afraid is the master plan of these developers, who don't live here, they come from Wichkshuan or Tennessee or somewhere; come develope it up, sell it and make money. And I think that if you would ask June 21, 1982 Item 11 Zoning Board 82-7'5 1 DISCUSSION rtiai" ov�� :' it some of these people that raised their hands, I'm sure that they don't live in the area. I know all of the people that objected to do. Their master plan is that we're going to build up this part commercial and then we'll go down Tigertail and build the necessary apartment buildings all the way down to US 1. Well, I'll tell you the Tiger in Tigertail has been quietly watching what's going on. But, I assure you that we are going to do every- thing possible. And our numbers are not only the Tigertail Association but every association in the Grove is very vitally interested in keeping the uniqueness and the beauty of this area; which the developers have no interest except to make money. Like Midus, we're going to turn everything to gold and forget about the quality of living. Thank you. Please give serious consideration to an entire arria that may be destroyed just by this one .simple decision. Thank you. Mr. Alfonso: Thank you. State your name and address for the record. Mr. Altshuler: My name is Richard Altshuler. I live at the intersection of Lincoln and Jefferson; at 3100 Jefferson Street. Preliminarily, I would like to say that I cannot question the integrity of the word of Joseph Reisman. If he says it, I believe that he will carry out anything he undertakes to do. However, we are all aware that there may come "a king who knows not Joseph". So, Mr. Reisman's sucesssor may not be of the same caliber of Mr. Reisman. I am an attorney. I have lived in this community and in this neighbor for twenty-three years. My children have grown up here. My son has been a paperboy in the neighborhood. We love our foliage and our quiet streets and the residential character of our neighborhood. I hope my grandchildren will grow up here and enjoy the same quiet peace that we have all been part of over these years. And I ask with all of the ferver and sincerity of my nature, that you vote "no" on this rezoning proposal. Thank you. Mr. Alfonso: Thank you. Anyone else? If not, I'm going to give you a few minutes for rebuttal. But before that, Mr. Whipple... Mr. Whipple: Yes, sir. Mr. Alfonso: The service station at the present time is at this location. It is a not conforming use. How long it can operate there? Mr-. Whipple: The terms of the zoning ordinance, without getting it out directly, I believe, provide you thirty or thiry- five years as a non -conforming commercial use in a residential district. I'm doing this from memory, but as a commercial use, in a residential district, it does have an amortization period of either thirty or thirty-five years, based upon the type of constru- ction. Mr. Alfonso: Are you aware of how long we can continue there? Mr. Whipple: Well, we're twenty-three years into the existing zoning ordinance; which I believe would be when it became non -conforming. So, we're either talking about seven or twelve years. June 21, 1982 Item 11 Zoning Board 82- 751-- iriri:S11 ::1, 6 J Mr. Alfonso: Seven or twelve years. So this is the case that, that at the present moment, they are using this lot as inten - sity use - commercial use. They come in with less intensity to'build an office. Thank you, Mr. Whipple. You have a few minutes for rebuttal, sir. Mr. Reisman: I'll make my rebuttal very brief. I appreciate so much what Dick Altshuler said. I was frankly some- what offended by some comments that were made; but I think that answers better than I could for the integrity of myself and my firm and the comments and the committments that we make. I would comment that, with regard to traffic - at rush hour, upon leaving the building, as we propose it, we gave this some thought; because who's going to be -leaving this building at rush hour, will be us. The natural way to get out of here is to proceed north on 27th Avenue and proceed east on US 1; if you're proceeding east. If you're pretending to go west, you go south and you come down to Bayshore.And the traffic is no worse with our moderate use building, that we propose for an office building, than it would be if we were to compact some thirty-five or forty apart- ment units on there. I think that the traffic would be consider- ably less. I also would suggest that the zoning map does not reflect the actual fact. When you look ... Mr. Alfonso: Just a moment. It's wrong; I agree. Where it is marked R-4 is supposed to be marked R-C. You are right, this is wrong. Mr. Reisman: Yes sir, that's correct; it's certainly incorrect with regard to the R-4 zoning that's shown there. In addition, on the map that's reflected as we see it now; if you took and colored in the commercial uses that are in that brown strip, which runs along 27th Avenue, you'd find that there really isn't an uninterupted residential zoning on 27th Avenue. You've got two filling stations on opposite ends of that little corridor; and that's the fact. The zoning may be different, but the uses are there. The actual fact exists. And not colors on maps; and what we wish were there; but what are actually there. And what we propose would ultimately, at the - remove that service station at the earliest time that that lease can be terminated, and remove it. And that would be within the next two and a half to three years. And that would be gone. Mr. Alfonso: Thank you. Mr. Reisman: And I would also comment, when I spoke with Mr. Whipple in his office with regard to this matter and he brought up the proposition that they are terminating statutes, ordinances, which can terminate these non -conforming uses, I asked him how many have been done? And his answer to me was "none" to his know- ledge. And I suggest that that service station will stay there until someone does something with it, such as what we're suggesting. Thank you. Mr. Alfonso: Thank you. At this time we're going to close the public hearing; hear among the Board Members. One at a time, please. Mr. Gort: Mr. Chairman, I've got a question of the Department. Mr. Alfonso: Yes, please. June 21, 1982 Item 11 Zoning Board 82"' 751 F Mr. Gort: Mr. Campbell, what is 27th Avenue - when is that suppose to have the south of Dixie into gone into four lane? Mr. Campbell: We don't have - I beg your pardon - we don't have a schedule for actually four-laning it. Our concept was something similiar to Bayshore Drive, but, in working with the Planning Department on the conceptual kind of thing, we had not gone to a full four lanes., We had done, I think, as couple of fifthteen or sixteen foot lanes on either side; which would not allow full four lanes. It woutd allow, though, for a vehicle, if it breaks down, have not to,block traffic. So we - the scheduling is not there, at the moment in time. Mr. Gort: So, in other words, you took that portion of 27th Avenue and that would be equivalent to what is aready being built north of it; north of Dixie Highway? Mr. Campbell: No, sir. No, sir. Mr. Gort: Okay, thank you. Mr. Alfonso: Mr. Reisman, I have a question for you please. Mr. Reisman: Yes, sir. Mr. Alfonso: Being that this Board is going to only be an Advisory Board for the City Commission, is there any way that from there to there do you have any plans filed in the Department so that we are assured, at least, that you are talking business? Mr. Reisman: We would certainly have no objection to doing that. We would commission our architects to do it. I'll go further than that and say that, if there is a possibility of our reducing to committment the representations that I have made here in the record, we're willing to do that also; as to height; as to no entrances; landscaping etc. We have no... Mr. Alfonso: To more or less keep that design? Mr. Reisman: Yes sir, that is our concept. The changes would not be significant; if the roof- line might be changed, that sort of thing. But we have no idea of going any higher; no more density; nor entrances or exits on Tigertail. That is our concept. And we do intend to put our parking concealed. Mr. Alfonso: That's part of the record. Mr. Freixas: Can we take a call on that? Mr. Alfonso: Okay, one at a time, please. Mr. Freixas: Well, if that's satisfactory to the Board. I just thought that we could get something better that will assure us that that is the building that is going to be built. But I feel that in no way that is going to affect the composition of Tigertail. I think it sure is an improvement in the sight of what they have over there. So, I move to recommend the change of zoning. (See next page for Resolution) June 21, 1982 Item 11 Zoning Board 82--'751 - 5 Mr. Guillermo Freixas offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption. RESOLUTION ZB 109-82 RESOLUTION TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COMMISSION APPROVAL OF CHANGE OF ZONING FROM R-4 (MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE) TO R-C (RESIDENTAL-OFFICE) LOTS 3 THROUGH 6 INCLUSIVE, BLOCK F; RHODES AMENDED PLAT OF NEW BISCAYNE (B-16); BEING APPROXIMATELY 3167-3173-3193 SW 27TE1 AVENUE. Upon being seconded by Mr. Alvaro Romero, the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: Ms. Baro* Messrs. Alfonso* Freixas and Romero NAYES: Ms. Basila Messrs. Gort* and Perry. Mr. Perez-Lugones: Motion passes 4-3. * Discussion during voting. Mr. Gort: Contrary to the - I've always been against change of zoning. If this was to be a four- laned had been built in there, I would have been in favor of all of it because I think that there to be a lot of use for it. But, being that it's only two Lanes and I don't think that there's that much business in the area, I'll vote against the motion. Ms. Baro: I want to explain my vote. I am - Mr. Reisman happens to be the attorney for my company - the company that I work for, that is. However, I feel that - I have been told that I have been told by the attorney that if I feel that I am voting in clear conscience; that I am allowed to vote. But naturally, I want to vote yes. I know the project and I know exactly what it's all about. Nuw, if this has nothing to do with my company in any way, this something that He is projecting that 1 didn't know about. And I feel that it's an improvement, definitely, and will not in any way change the Tigertail. So I vote yes. Mr Alfonso: Before I vote, I'm going to say what I said before. We only - I'll do it as advisory to the City Commission, which our action has to be reapproved or approved by the City Commission with this. So I vote yes. June 21, 1982 Item 11 Zoning Board 82-751 !. June 2 _ ,1?t 2. t� To whom it may concern. The Gas Ctation at the corner of 27th Avenue and ii`ertail Avenue in Coconut Grove, has been a rather unattractive building; in the Coconut Grove area for many years. I have seen the plans for the proposed development on this site and 1 am in favor of it. I thin: the proposed bu;ld;nC 'S in keepinC- with Coconut Grove's best characterist-.cs and ;s a def.nite improvement over what is there. 1' 1 LCI-NA D. Cwner, Grove a:ll Hpartr.ents, 2629 :youth bayshore Drive, E'iam5 , F1a.33133• 82--'75i - July 15, 1982 To Whom It May Concern: I am a property owner within 375 feet of the Chevron Service Station and the adjoining properties that have come up before you for rezoning. The aforementioned property has been consistantly commercial use since I can remember and has never been very attractive or in keeping with the characteristics of Coconut Grove. I, for one, having reviewed the applicants plans am very much in favor of his request for zoning change. There is no question that the plans are a far better improvement than the existing use of the property. I encourage you to grant the applicants request for rezoning. Resp ctfu11y yours, Dr. Grego Huh 685 Curtiswood Key Biscayne, Florida 33149 Property Owned: 2720 Shipping Avenue Coconut Grove, Florida 82-'752 - 9, -BONING PETITION l P►"ope'-y Descriution: Lots 3, 4, 5, & 6, Block F, Rhode's Amended Plat of New Liscayne, Mat Gook B Page 16, as recorded in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. ProperLty Address: 3167, 3173, & 3193 S.Id. 27th Avenue, Coconut Grove, Florida. e uest: The Applicants hereby request that the above described property b- re'zuned from R-4 (medium density multiple dwelling) to R-C (residential -Office). Petition: We, the undersigned property owners, are within 375 feet. of the above described property. We understand and approve the applicants request for the rezoning of the subject property. "AM'E: (Signature) _ -- - Da Le: ---- - -- 1---- -- - �(Y10�- L tll -- //I0 R'2. Ty-E ed/Pr-i n ted Mark A. Wilkins 1,LTU_1n_tut,___Ln ,_ _ Juana D. Houston fIr_pperty 0!-med Cnrn- Grove __I w_ 2------.- -. Robert B. Green Page 1, # 11, 13 -Green Const,.Cn-#2� Page 4, # 12,_ 13 Robert B. Green 1, # 12 _jPage Anthony Riva J f Page 5, # 6 & 7 Bps tifa.na.- Inc.-_J - _ _-.-- John B. Martin Page 3, # 9 Robert L. Dykes William Noriega Magna Investment I James G. Robertson Kay Byrne Graham Sarjeant _jGeorge R. Black Page 3, # 5 Page_4, _# 4 Page 1, # 6 Page 8, # 10 age b; �-�---------__---- - .----. Page 7, # 3 & Page 8, # 11. Page 1, # 2 Sary R. Frow jPage 4, # 10 Q.B. Bescher �2810 Shipping Avenue Richard D. Gardner (Page 2, # 1 -- Rose Rubinstein Page 7, # 8 Moraen E. Koven ^IPage 8, # 1 ,Thomas Lacayo !2717 Tigertail Unit 410 Page 8, # 25 Page 4, # 14, Page 8, # 23 Pace 9. # 20. Pace 5, # 2 Page 1, # 4 Page 10, # 5 Page 1,#5&9 - -Gus__Mhimi_o._4Jr,r3$QQ__WPR ng_AY9NQ_ Nancy Uriarte for page 82--'751. 10 ,* �.•. ZOr! I NG PETITION Property Description: Lots 3, 4, 5, & 6, Block F, Rhodes Amended Plat of New Biscayne, Plat Book B Page 15, as recorded in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Property Address: 3167, 3173, & 3193 S.W. 27th Avenue, Coconut Grove, Florida. Request: The Applicants hereby request that the above described property be rezoned from R-a (medium density multiple dwellin,) to R-C (residential -office` Petition: We, the undersigned property owners, are within 375 feet of the above described property. We understand and approve the applicants request for the rezoning of the subject property. �1 !!t'. Cir.netiivn� nato- TvnPd/Printed- Pronertv Owned: 2715 Tigertail Ave. # 204 �S- L C. AP I JDouglas Dr. Jerry E. Enis 'Coconut Grove, Florida Yoder jPage 8, # 3 J . /(9 f� A. Valdes Fauli ! Page 9, # 6 Michele Maseda for! — _ . Of hUw Z c 0 Richard DeVille Page 5, # 5 David Welch Pa a 3, # 10 i O Monty P. Trainer Page 2, # 10 / Y Frances M Mein Paae_4, # 1 6 � Michael Lederberg for J . RubimAti n ! Page 5._#10 u- Michael Gold e 9. # 10 & 17 �/A Consuelo Stewar for Jorge Hugony I Pa a 7, # 13 oa v oalix --- Jr 4_ Hpnry nrevi ch Pdoe 3. # 7 i t _ ry 'AJCIO" v y _ �co Henry B. Iler Page 4, # 11 Louise L. Rubin i 3166 Center Avenue I14J j1 James Stewart for -Gr_apeland. Dev.. Co. -_Page 5, 82"%51 ZON I NG PEfiI7I0h`' Property Description: Lots 3, 4, 5, & 6, Block F, Rhodes Amended Plat of New Biscayne, Plat Book B Page 16, as recorded in the Public Records of Dade County. Florida. Property Address: 3167, 3173, & 3193 S.W. 27th Avenue, Coconut Grove, Florida. Re uq es t: The Applicants hereby request that the above described property be rezoned from R-4 (medium density multiple dwelling) to R-C (residential -office). Petition: We, the undersigned property owners, are within 375 feet of tuhe above described property. We understand and approve the applicants request for the rezoning of the subject property. NAME: (Signature) Date: Typed/Printed: Property Owned: I. Carrera Justiz Page 1, # 3 i 1 I 82_-'71 F Z O N I N G P T I I 0 Property Description: Lots 3, 4, 5, & 6, Block F, Rhodes Amended Plat of New Biscayne, Plat Book B Page 16, as recorded in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Property Address: 3167, 3173, & 3193 S.W. 27th Avenue, Coconut Grove, Florida. Reaues t: The Applicants hereby request that the above described property be rezoned from R-4 (medium density multiple dwelling) to R-C (residential -office). Petition: We, the undersigned property owners, are within 375 feet of the above described property. We understand and approve the applicants request for the rezoning of the //subject property. NAME: riSidnature) Date: Tvoed/Printed: Prooertv Owned: Paul Hoffenberg Pa a 10 # 4 i- � ZONING PETIfiI�� 0 Property Description: Lots 3, 4, 5, & 6, Block F, Rhodes Amended Plat of New Biscayne, Plat Book B Page 16, as recorded in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Property Address: 3167, 3173, & 3193 S.W. 27th Avenue, Coconut Grove, Florida. Reaues t: The Applicants hereby request that the above described property be rezoned from R-d (medium density multiple dwelling) to R-C (residential -office). Petition: We, the indersigned property owners, are within 375 feet of the above described property. We understand and approve the applicants request for the rezoning of the subject property. PlA��1F• 1Ri�naturPl date: Tvoed/Printed: ProDerty Owned: David G. Jo lin Pa e 7 # 5 - I ZONING pEO— — No Property Description: Lots 3, 4, 5, & 6, Block F, Rhodes Amended Plat of New Biscayne, Plat Book B Page 16, as recorded in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Property Address: 3167, 3173, & 3193 S.W. 27th Avenue, Coconut Grove, Florida. Reouest: The Applicants hereby request that the above described property be rezoned from R-4 (medium density multiple dwelling) to R-C (residential -office). Petition: We, the undersigned oroperty owners, are within 375 feet of the above described property. We understand and approve the applicants request for the rezoning of the subject propgrty. NAME: (Siotiature) ' Date: TvnPd/Printed- Prnnarty nwnnri- "`� Jose Sza oczn i k Page 9 7 - _ a I 82=751 Z0NING PETIfi10 Property Description: Lots 3, 4, 5, & 6, Block F, Rhodes Amended Plat of New Biscayne, Plat Book B Page 16, as recorded in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Property Address: 3167, 3173, & 3193 S.W. 27th Avenue, Coconut Grove, Florida. Re stt: The Applicants hereby request that the above described property be rezoned fr m ^- (Tedium density multiple dwelling) to R-C (residential -office). Petition: ','le, th= -,nders?nned orooerty owners, are within 375 fees or `.he abode describe,; property. We understand and approve the applicants request for the rezoning Of the subject property. C Date: TvDed/?rin'.ar' PYnn:.-t'�v (1wncrt• tl 6 OEMO i 827 751 ZONING P E t I T I +' Property Description: Lots 3, 4, 5, & 6, Block F, Rhodes Amended Plat of New Biscayne, Plat Book B Page 16, as recorded in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Property Address: 3167, 3173, & 3193 S.W. 27th Avenue, Coconut Grove, Florida. Revues t: The Applicants hereby request that the above described property be rezoned ri Jni -41 (medium density n-litiple dwelling) to R-C (residential -office". Petition: W-2, `t,e undersic;ned nronerty owners, are within 375 feet of the above describe;: Property. We understand and approve the applicants request for the rezoning er- the subject property. y. rc nature;, Date: T ed/Printed: Property C.med: Don Lynn _ Page 9, # 20 i ZONING PETITION Property Description: Lots 3, 4, 5, & 6, Block F, Rhodes Amended Plat of New Biscayne, Plat Book B Page 16, as recorded in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Property Address: 3167, 3173, & 3193 S.W. 27th Avenue, Coconut Grove, Florida. Request: The Applicants hereby request that the above described property be rezoned from P.-4 (medium density multiple dwelling) to R-C (residential -office). Petition: We, the undersigned property owners, are within 375 feet of the above described property. We understand and approve the applicants request for the rezoning 6f the ubject property. NAME:-iciature Date: Typed/Printed: Property uwneo: UA)rr, !v y �%s ��. r'R ��A vw r 0,6f'&T A I L Aea Z 0 N I N G PETITI0N ------ `'. Proper - Description: Lots 3, 4, 5, & 6, Block F, Rhodes Amended Plat of New Biscayne, Plat Book B Page 16, as recorded in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Property Address: 3167, 3173, b 3193 S.W. 27th Avenue, Coconut Grove, Florida. Reouest: The !applicants hereby request that the above described property be rezoned `r :R-" (medium density multiple dwelling) to R-C 'resi,Ipri Petition: We, the undersigned property owners, are within 375 feet of the above described property. We understand and approve the appl icants reque;-- `or the re-zoninr, of the subject property. tiSignature) Dute _--- — - Tvoed;�='�-inte� �'.�opert„ ��•rne Donna Holman __. _r age 9, # 12 _ 827 751 Z 0 N I N G P E T I T 1 0 Nf& IN Property Description: Lcts 3, 4, 5, & 6, Block F, Rhodes Amended Plat of New Biscayne, Plat Book 8 Page 16, as recorded in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Property Address: 3167, 3173. & 3193 S.W. 27th Avenue, Coconut Grove. Florida. Reouest: The Applicants hereby request that the above described property be rezoned `rr :R (medium dens-tv multipl_ dwelling) to R-( Pezi tion: We, the undersigned property owners, are within 375 feet of =he above described property. We understand and approve the appl cants rec.,es' 'c;r the rezoninc of the subject property. :i'.ME (Signature% Dote iVJed; `- `_doer-`--O-=nPC _ - -t` Donna Holman __. Page g, # 12 i 82-'751 Property Description: Lots 3, 4, 5, & 6, Block F, Rhodes Amended Plat of New Biscayne, Plat Book B Page 16, as recorded in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Property Address: 3167, 3173, & 3193 S.W. 27th Avenue, Coconut Grove, Florida. Request: The Applicants hereby request that the above described property be rezoned from R-a (medium density multiple dwelling) to R-C (residential -office). Petition: We, the undersigned property owners, are within 375 feet of the above described property. We understand and approve the applicants request for the rezoning of the subject property. [ILA C R N G P I Property Description: Lots 3, 4, 5, & 6, Block F, Rhodes Amended Plat of New Biscayne, Plat Book B Page 16, as recorded in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Property Address: 3167, 3173, & 3193 S.W. 27th Avenue, Coconut Grove, Florida. Request: The Applicants hereby request that the above described property be rezoned from R-Q (medium density multiple dwelling) to R-C (residential -office). Petition: We, the undersigned property owners, are within 375 feet of the above described property. We understand and approve the applicants request for the rezoning of the subject property. r)ata. Tvoed/Printed: Property Owned: f� 2- Mary Ferguson 3139 S.W. 27th Avenue # 6 b- elen Humm Pop Pace 4. # Page 9, #, 5 & 7 19 & 23 �' D.W. Matsun Andrew L. Woodbury Pa a 10. # 2 j/ Peter S. Herrick 3139 S.W. 27th Ave. #2 _ j z Lots 3 & 4. Block 40, Rho( Lorna D. Robertson Amended Plat Of New-Bisca Richard A. Crisonin , : ; Atty for T Theodore G. Hempstead C w ,5 I `_ _ Page 9. # 8 W4* -;• Sophia del Antina 3132 Center Street T•7��j W. I. Whitesell 3124 Center Streetgw James B. Farrell 3134 Center Street ?►'f% 1 Donald M. Rei del ! Page 8, #, 2 ll Raul Perez for /? i�l Frank E. Rodrigues Page 8, T I Page 9, 3 12 & 13 W 16 ,✓J �`� -tikicholas Crane vQ-; Larry Jay - - -- Page- 10, #__1 ZONING P10 A1• Property Description: Lots 3, 4, 5, & 6, Block F, Rhodes Amended Plat of New Biscayne, Plat Book B Page 16, as recorded in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Property Address: 3167, 3173, & 3193 S.W. 27th Avenue, Coconut Grove, Florida. Request: The Applicants hereby request that the above described property be rezoned from R-a (medium density multiple dwelling) to R-C (residential -office). Petition: We, the undersigned oroperty owners, are within 375 feet of the above described property. We understand and approve the applicants request for the rezoning of the subject property. NAPIE: (Signature) Date: Paae 4. # 5 & 7 Dmnn O . 10 Q. 7?. 7I 7n C 1.1 77tL A.._ A 4. acU Lorna D. Robertson I AmendedPlat- OfNewBiscay. A -- - v 7-7—Sj W. 1. Whitesell 3124 Center Street tn ! James B. Farrell 3134 Center Street ~ "t'-- i IDonald M. Reidel Page 8 # 2 IRaul. Perez o— r - h j %j Frank E. Rodrigues I Page 8, 3 12 & 13 _ ✓,� I }�� Nicholas Crane — Page 9, # 16 1 — ,� Z vQ�' Larry Jay Page 10,# 1 �Z0NING P E T I T 1 0 r-operty Description: )ts 3, 4, 5, b 6, Block F, Rhodes Amended Plat of New Biscayne, Plat Book B Page 16, as recorded in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Property Address: 3167, 3173, b 3193 S.W. 27th Avenue, Coconut Grove, Florida. Request: The Applicants hereby request that the above described property be rezoned from P, (medium density m_,ltiple dwelling) to R-C (residential -office). Petition: the indersigneo orooerty owners, are within 375 of the above described Property. We understand and approve the applicants request for the rezoning he subject proper . '1L�'= ` `�JanaS. turn Date: Tvoed/Printed: PrODerty n.med: — (Pa tV .&PL M/M Matthew Ri nder e 9 # 13 •/:• Pat Jav iPage 9, # 18 NJ •""'�"' `' % Ted JamesPage �'2720 7, # 15 3 Z G reg roy Han Shipping Avenue Vol Jerrad Edbrook IPage 7, # 18 Gladys Pesch — 3139 S.W. 27th Ave. # 4 - ft- - - 711MIJ. /o 01 1q 82-751 E 9 411�"Z O N I N G .r PE1'ITIOIti !0 Property Description: { Lots 3, 4, 5, & 6, Block F, Rhodes Amended Plat of New Biscayne, Plat Book B ' Page 16, as recorded in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Property Address: 3167, 3173, & 3193 S.W. 27th Avenue, Coconut Grove, Florida. Re ues t: The Applicants hereby request that the above described property be rezoned from R-a (medium density multiple dwelling) to R-C (residential -office). Petition: 1•i'e, the undersigned property owners, are within 375 `eet of the above described property. We understand and approve the applicants request for the rezoning of the subject property. \ISignatJ-e) 1 Date: Tvoed/Printed' PrnnPrty nwnoH- --� Dr. August Miale Page 7, # 1 _ I I 82. 751 o? Z 0 N I N G P E T I T I — — — — — — — — — — — — — - Property Descriotion: Lots .3. 5, & 6, Block F. Rhode" Biscf,,/rie, 3 Page 16, as recorded in "he Public �,ecnrd-, or" Dade County, r ;. (J Property Address: 3167. 3173, J 3193 S.W. 27h Avenue. ';rove, Reaues t: %, 1 herehy b-2 70 d dens oil !;-,iersifined property 0,.*0)t!!,s, _r o L, .-:e -inderstand, of 82-751L Z0N I N G P E T I T10ii*►•} L _E E E c r `r cper ty Description Lc4s 3, 4, 5, & 6, block F, Rhodes Amended Flat c;r %e<<: Plat Book B Wage 16, as recorded in the Public Records or Dade County, Finrida. Property Address: 3167, 3173, & 3193 S.W. 27th Avenue, Coconut Grove. Florida. aenlie st: '�•,e '-lpplicants hereby request that the above describe:; be rezoned (medium density multiplE dwellings to R-C P. • i Lion: 'rle, the undersigned property owners, are within 3 ; =ee _re above described property. Vie understand and approve the appl scan*; the rezoninG_ o` the subject property. signature) „ate: rUti� JUeI'bV OW[led: _ ---- -- - - -- -1j - �715-T ger ai venue-- M/M Stanley Tobiasoh Unit # 609 � I 82-751 =` Pi4PERTY OWNERS WHO OWN kmLERTY WITHIN A 375 FOOT RADIUS Lots 3, 4, 5 & 6, Block F, RHODES AMENDED PLAT OF EW BISCAYNE PB B/16, Dade County, Florida. DAY GROVE TERRACE (9/180) 1) Block: N/A KITU Investment, Inc. Lots: 1 thru 9 & 48 c/o Clark -Biondi Company Address: 2730 Tigertail Avenue 848 Brickell Avenue Suite 500 Miami, Fla. 33131 CORNELIA M. DAY PENT HOMESTEAD (3/5 & 3/16) 2) Block: N/A Lot: 1 Address: 2701-03 Day Avenue 3) Block: N/A Lot: 2 less Street Address: 3184 S.W. 27th Avenue 4) Block: N/A Lot: 4 Address: 3172 S.W. 27th Avenue 5) Block: N/A Lots: 5 & 6 less Ely 15Ft for Street Address: 3156-58-60-62 S.W. 27th Ave. 6) Block: N/A Lot: 7 less Street Address: 3184 S.W. 27th Avenue 7) Block: N/A Lot: 8 Address: 3149 Center Street 8) Block: N/A Lot: 9 Address: 3159 Center Street 9) Block: N/A Lot: 10 less W 1OFt. for Street Address: 3161-63 Center Street 10) Block: N/A Lots: S)_2 of lot 12 and all -of lots 13 & 14. Address: 3191 Center Street 11) Block: Lots: Address: 12) Block: Lots: Address: 13) Block: Lots: Address: George R. Black 2999 Brickell Avenue Miami, Fla. 33131 Ignacio Carrera & Clara Justiz 451 East Dilido Drive Miami Beach, Fla. 33139 Cecil & Grace M. Loy, Trs. Roger A. Loy 3172 S.W. 27th Avenue Miami, Fla. 33133 Walter A. Mobley P.O. Box 33-451 Miami, Fla. 33133 James G. & Joan Robertson 414 Ingraham Building Miami, Florida 33131 Robert C. & Leona Jenkins 7050 S.W. 19th Terrace Miami, Florida 33155 Zygmund & Elizabeth Golembiewski 3159 Center Street Miami, Fla. 33133 Walter A. Mobley P.O. Box 33-451 Miami, Fla. 33133 Stuart C. Taylor 3191 Center Street Miami, Fla. 33133 N/A Green Construction Corp. # 2 That portion of lots 11 & 12 AKA 9200 S. Dadeland Blvd. Unit 1, Center View Townhouse Miami, Fla. 33156 per OR 10744-1772 & Prop. Int. in Common Elements. None N/A Robert Brian Green That portion of lots 11 & 12 AKA 3165 Center Street Unit 2, Center View Townhouse Miami, Fla. 33133 per OR 10744-1772 & Prop. Int. in Common Elements. None N/A That portion of lots 11 & 12 AKA Unit 3, Center View Townhouse per OR 10744-1772 & Prop. Int. in Common Elements. None Green Construction Corporation # 2 9200 S. Dadeland Blvd. Miami, Fla. 33156 82-'75 1 Page Two 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) M) 9) 10) 11) Block: N/A Lots: 15, 16 & 17, less S SFt. of lot 15. Address: 2841 Day Avenue Block: N/A Lots: E 100Ft. of lot 15 to 17 less S 5Ft. of E 100Ft of lot 15. Block: N/A Lots: 18 Address: 3191 Center Street Block: N/A Lots: 19 & 20 N/A/U Folio 01-4121-79 Apoger 11 Condo. Block: N/A Lot: 21, now with lot 9 of W 150Ft. of Block 8. Address: None Block: N/A Lot: 3, less Ely 15Ft. for Street Grove Gate Condo. Address: None Block: That portion of lots 11 & 12 AKA Common Area for Center View Townhouse per OR 10744-1772 N/A/U with Units 1,2 & 3 as Common Elements Address: None Block: N/A Lots: 45 thru 52 less Street N/A/U Folio 01-4121-73 Tigertail Bay Condo. RHODES AMENDED PLAT OF NEW BISCAYNE (B/16) Richard D. Gardner 2841 Day Avenue Miami, Fla. 33133 Stuart C. Taylor 3191 Center Street Miami, Fla. 33133 Stuart C. Taylor 3191 Center Street Miami, Fla. 33133 REFERENCE ONLY REFERENCE ONLY REFERENCE ONLY REFERENCE ONLY REFERENCE ONLY Block: 41 REFERENCE ONLY Lots: 1, 2 & 3 desc. Beg. NEIy corner of lot 1, S 38deg. E 176Ft. S 51deg. W 60.30Ft. S 38deg. E 6.1OFt. S 51deg. W 19.55Ft. N 38deg. W 6.1OFt. S 51deg. N 38deg. W 175Ft. N 51deg. E 140Ft. POB., N/A/U Folio 01-4121-05 Coconut Grove Apartment Condo. Address: None Block: 40 Monty Trainer Lots: SEly 100Ft. of NW 225Ft. of lots 2660 Tigertail Avenue 5 & 6. Miami, Fla. 33133 Address: 2660 Tigertail Avenue Block: 41 First National Bank Of South Miami, Trs. Dept. Lots: 1, 2 & 3, desc. Beg. NEIy corner 5750 Sunset Drive of lot 1, S 38deg. E 175Ft. to Miami, Fla. 33143 POB., S 51deg. W 60.30Ft. S 38 deg. E 6'.1OFt. S 51deg. W 19.55Ft. N 38deg..W 6.IOFt.S 38deg. E 41Ft. N 51deg. E 140Ft. N 38deg. w 380Ft. to POB. Address: 2651 S. Bayshore Drive - 2 - 82-751 Page Three 0 RHODES AMENDED PLAT OF NEW BISCAYNE (B/16) Continued: 1) Block: 41 Lots: 8 & w� of lot 7 Address: 2665 S. Bayshore Drive 2) Block: 41 Lots: Portion of lot 9, & Parc. of land Lyg. SWly corner of lot 9 NEIy 51.32Ft. NWIy 322.O1Ft. SWly 53.31Ft. SEIy 333.64Ft. NEIy 0.2OFt. to POB. Address: 2667 South Bayshore Drive 3) Block: 41 Lots: Portion of lots 10 thru 15,beg. NEIy corner of lot 10 SWly 253.96Ft. N 54.8Ft. N 51deg. E 113.88Ft. SEIy 228.65Ft. to POB. Address: 2669 South Bayshore Drive 4) Block: 41 Lots: S11.32Ft. of lot 31 and all of lots 32 thru 34 & beg. NE corner of lot 35 S 12.5Ft. NWIy 17.67Ft. E 12.5Ft. to POB. & lots 10 thru 15 less beg. NEly corner of lot 10 NW1y 374.7OFt. to SWly corner of lot 9, S 5.86Ft. SEIy 141.46Ft. M/L S 51deg. W113.88Ft. NEIy 153.96Ft. to POB. Address: 3231 South Bayshore Drive 5) Block: 41 Lots: 23 to 27 inclusive Address: 3205 S.W. 27th Avenue 6) Block: 41 Lots: 6 & El� of lot 7 Address: 2661 South Bayshore Drive 7) Block: 41 Lots: W 1OFt. of lot 3, & all of 4 & 5. Address: 2678 Tigertail Avenue 8) Block: 41 Lots: 28, 29 & 30 & N 13.18Ft. of lot 3, & portion of lot 9 desc. beg. NW corner of lot 28, E 119.15Ft. SEIy 114.93Ft. SWly 53.31Ft. NWIy 37.46Ft. N 5.86Ft. W 125Ft. N 88.18Ft. to POB. Address: 3209 S.W. 27th Avenue 9) Block: 40 Lots: SE 10OFt. of NW 225Ft. of lots 5 & 6. Address: 3225 Darwin Street 10) Block: F Lot: 1 Address: 3151 S.W. 27th Avenue 11) Block: F Lot: 2 Address: 3163 S.W. 27th Avenue Irvona Property, N.V. 6901 S.W. 147th Avenue Suite 2-A Miami, Fla. 33193 W-L Grove Associates 2951 South Bayshore Drive Miami, Fla. 33133 W-L Grove Associates 2951 South Bayshore Drive Miami, Fla. 33133 W-L Grove Associates 2951 South Bayshore Drive Miami, Fla. 33133 Robert L. & Elizabeth Dykes 6840 Sunrise Place Coral Gables, Florida 33133 Central Bank & Trust Company c/o Trust Dept. 1313 N.W. 36th Street Miami, Fla. 33142 Summer Hill Apartments, Inc. 1901 S.14. 82nd Court Miami, Fla. 33155 W-L Grove Associates 2951 South Bayshore Drive Miami, Fla. 33133 John B. Martin 3225 Darwin Street Miami, Fla. 33133 David F. Walsh 2410 Prairie Avenue Miami Beach, Fla. 33140 Walter A. Mobley P.O. Box 33-451 Miami, Fla. 33133 - 3 - 82-751 i. Page Four RHODES AMENDED PLAT OF NEW BISCAYNE (B/16) Continued ' 1) Block: F Lot: 3 Address: 3167 S.W. 27th Avenue 2) Block: F Lots: 4, 5 & 6 Address: 3173 & 3193 S.W. 27th Ave. 3) Block: F Lots: 7 & 8, N/A/U Folio 01-4122-10 Schooner Port Condo. 4) Block: 28 Lots: 1 & 2 less NWIy 65Ft. Address: 2615 Tigertail Avenue 5) Block: 28 Lots: NEly 1/2 of lot 3, less NWIy 65Ft. Address: None 6) Block: 28 Lot: NWIy 65Ft. of lots 1 & 2 & Nly 1/2 of lot 3 Address: 3100 Blaine Street 7) Block: Lots: ' Address: 8) Block: Lots: Address: 9) Block: Lots: Address: 10) Block: Lots: 11) Block: Lot: Address: 12) Block: Lots: Address: 13) Block: Lots: Address: Frances M. Stein 3167 S.W. 27th Avenue # 4 Miami, Fla. 33133 Coconut Grove Investment Corp. 3460 Sou"' Dixie Highway Miami, Florida 33133 REFERENCE ONLY Magna Investment Corp. 1600 South Bayshore Drive Miami, Fla. 33133 J.W. & Helen Hum (Same as Helen Popp) 4155 Pamona Miami, Fla. 33133 Dennis G. King 2614 Lincoln Avenue Miami, Fla. 33133 28 Helen 0. Popp S 10OFt. of lot 3, less NE 25Ft. 4155 Pamona & S 10OFt. of lot 4, & NE 25Ft. Miami, Fla. 33133 of lot 5. 2639 Tigertail Avenue 28 Dennis King S 10OFt. of lot 3, less NE 25Ft. 2915 Emathia Street & S 10OFt. of lot 4, & S 10OFt. Miami, Fla. 33133 of lot 5. 2624 Lincoln Avenue 28 Robert C. & Leona Jenkins 6, less NW 80.5Ft. & SWz of lot 7050 S*.W. 19th Terrace 5, & 80.5Ft. of NWI of lot 5. Miami, Florida 33155 2663 Tigertail Avenue 28 NWIy 80.5Ft. of lot 5 & 80.5Ft. of NWIy of lot 5. 28 '2- 5, less the W 15Ft. for R/W 3111 S.W. 27th Avenue Charles & Dorothy Frow 3141 Darwin Street Miami, Fla. 33133 Henry B. Iler 2955 Whitehead Street Miami, Fla. 33133 27 Green Construction Corp. W 2 6 AKA Unit 1 Cove Townhouse per 9200 South Dadeland Blvd. OR 10706-229 & Prop. Int. in Miami, Fla. 33156 Common Elements. 3115 S.W. 27th Avenue 27 Green Construction Corp. # 2 6 AKA Unit 2 Cove Townhouse per 9200 South Dadeland Blvd. OR 10706-229 & Prop. Int. in Miami, Fla. 33156 Common Elements. 3115 S.W. 27th Avenue 14) Block: 27 Brenton N. & Anthe. Ver Ploeg Lots: 6 AKA Unit 3 Cove Townhouse per 1980 Tigertail Avenue OR 10706-229 & Prop. Int. in Miami, Fla. 33133 Common Elements. Address: 3115 S.W. 27th Avenue 82-'751 - 4 - P&ge Five RHODES AMENDED PLAT OF NEW BISCAYNE (B/16) Continued 1) Block: 27 REFERENCE ONLY Lot 6 AKA Common Area for Cove Townhouse per OR 10706-229 N/A/U with Units.1,.2 & 3 as Common Elements. 2) Block: 27 Brenton Ver Ploeg Lot: 7 1980 Tifertail Avenue Address: 3119 S.W. 27th Avenue Miami, Florida- 33133 3) Block: 27 Grapeland Development Corp. Lot: 8 2541 Lincoln Avenue Address: 3127 S.W. 27th Avenue Miami, Florida 33133 4) Block: 27 REFERENCE ONLY Lot: 9, N/A/U Folio 01-4122-06 Grove Bay Townhouse Condo. Address: None 5) Block: 27 Richard DeVille Lot: 10 & SWIy 5Ft. of lot 12 911 Anastasia Avenue Address: 2629 Lincoln Avenue Coral Gables, Fla. 33134 6) Block: 27 Bastifano, Inc. Lots: 12, less SWIy 5Ft. & lots 58 Curtiss Parkway 13 & 14 less NEly 1OFt. of Miami Springs, Fla. 33166 lot 14. Address: 2621 Lincoln Avenue 7) Block: 27 Bestifano, Inc. Lots: NE 1OFt. of lot 14 & all of 58 Curtiss Parkway — lot 15. Miami Springs, Fla. 33166 Address: 3084 Blaine -.Street PROJECT GEMINI (104/91) 8) Block: N/A Edward Nieto & Gerard Barrio Lot: 1-W 2930 Shipping Avenue Address: 2930 Shipping Avenue Miami, Fla. 33133 9) Block: N/A John Bave MOVED OUT Lot: 1-E 2920 Shipping Avenue Address: 2920 Shipping Avenue Miami, Fla. 33133 10) Block: N/A Joseph Rubinstein Lot: 2 2910 Shipping Avenue Address: 2910 Shipping Avenue Miami, Fla. 33133 11) Block: N/A John W. Thummel Lot: 3-W 2906 Shipping Avenue Address: 2906 Shipping Avenue Miami, Fla. 33133 12) Block: N/A Lot: 3-E Address: 2900 Shipping Avenue Daniel R. Knox 2900 Shipping Avenue Miami, Fla. 33133 - 5 - 82-751 Page Six TIGERTAIL BAY CONDOMINIUM: DECRIBED CORNELIA M. DAY SUB PENT HOMESTEAD, PB 3/5 & PB 3/16 Lots 45 thru 52 less Streets. 1) Unit 101 2) Unit 102 3) Unit 103 4) Unit 104 5) Unit 105 — 6) Unit 106 7) Unit 107 8) Unit 108 9) Unit 109 10) Unit 110 11) Unit 201 12) Unit 202 2715 Tigertail Avenue Coconut Grove, Fla. 33133 Unless otherwise stated the address for all the owners listed below are as shown above. Joyce N. Angel Stuart C. Taylor 3191 Center Street Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 Weinstein & Stauber, P.A. 820 Authur Godfrey Road Miami Beach, Fla. 33140 Theodore & Nancy Crisonino Helen M. Reichling James D. Davey Maria B. Diaz c/o Frank L. Diaz 3126 Coral Way Miami, Fla. 33145 Edgar H. Tennis Graham M. & Beryl Serjeant 5605 S.W. 74th Street Miami, Fla. 33143 Christine Anderson Gilda Pollak William Lustgarten 0 82- 75 JL - :. Page Seven TIGERTAIL BAY CONDOMINIUM DESC. CORNELIA M. DAY SUB. PENT. HOMESTEAD PB 3/5 & PB 3/16 Lots 2715 Tigertail Avenue 45 thru 52 less Streets. Coconut Grove, Fla. 33133 Unless otherwise stated the address for all the owners listed below are as shown above. 1) Unit 203 August Miale 101 Crandon Blvd. #241 Key Biscayne, Fla. 33149 2) Unit 204 Jerry E. Enis 6980 S.W. 105th Street Miami, Fla. 33156 3) Unit 205 Graham R. & Beryl Serjeant 5605 S.W. 74th Street Miami, Fla. 33143 4) Unit 206 Qussie Jacobskind 5) Unit 207 David G. Jopling 6) Unit 208 Donald K. Picker 7) Unit 209 Joseph Shabathai 8) Unit 210 Rose Rubinstein L.E. REM: Robert Rubinstein 9) Unit 301 Stephen & Doris E. Fornino 10) Unit 302 Luis & Carmen Dordoba 11) Unit 303 Marion Mione 12) Unit 304 John J. & Evelin McGillivary 13) Unit 305 Jorge & Margarita Hugony 14) Unit 306 Gladstone D. Meyler 15) Unit 307 Linda Klingberg 1.6) Unit 308 Brenda Ann Lee 9300 South Dadeland Blvd. Miami, Fla. 33156 17) Unit 309 Kingsley & Gwendolyn Lee-Lum 18) Unit 310 Jerrad R. Edbrook 19) Unit 401 Golbert M. Frimet - 7 - 82--75 1 Page Eight TIGERTAIL BAY CONDOMINIUM DESCRIBED CORNELIA M. DAY SUB PENT HOMESTEAD, PB 3/5 & PB 3/16 Lots 45 thru 52 less Streets. 1) Unit 402 2) Unit 403 3) Uni t 404 4) Unit 405 5) Unit 406 6) Unit 407 7) Unit 408 8) Unit 409 9) Unit 410 10) Unit 501 11) llni t 502 12) Unit 503 13) Unit 504 14) Unit 505 15) Unit 506 16) Unit 507 17) Unit 508 18) Unit 509 19) Unit 510 20) Unit 601 21) Unit 602 22) Unit 603 23) Unit 604 24) Unit 605 25) Unit 606 2715 Tigertail Avenue Coconut Grove, Fla. 33133 Unless otherwise stated the address for all the owners listed below are shown above. Morgan E. Koyen Donald M, Riedel L. Douglas Yoder 1011 Genoa Street Coral Gables, Fla. 33134 Phillip W. Charles Maria E. Wolf David M. Ligerman Betty R. Ciaffone R. Thomas Chrismer 6362 Westbury Avenue Montreal, Quebec CANADA James B. & Kay Byrne 5605 S.W. 74th Street Miami, Fla. 33143 Dr. Graham & Beryl Sarjeant University Of West Indies Medical Research Council Kingston 7, Jamaica West Indies Frank Rodrigues Frank E. Rodrigues Marni Helene Pilafian Leslie Tobin Thomas J. Cahill, Jr. Richard A. Carroll Judy G. Hicks Maggi A. Griffin Eli Danikow, Jr. Patrick B. Provitola Prim Juan Muntadas Brenton N. Ver Ploeg Anson L. & Barbara Johnson Florence Allen - 8 - 82- 7'51 . Page Nine TIGERTAIL BAY CONDOMINIUM DESCRIBED CORNELIA M. DAY SUB PENT 2715 Tigertail Avenue HOMESTEAD PB 3/5 & PB 3/16 Lots Coconut Grove, Fla. 33133 45 thru 52 less Streets. Unless otherwise stated the address for all owners listed below are shown above. 1) Unit 607 Andre & Miguelina Guilliano c/o Luis Uriarte 2109 Granada Blvd. Coral Gables, Fla. 33134 2) Unit 608 Diego Alonso 3) Unit 609 Stanley & Reba Tobiason 4) Unit 610 Lee I. Weintraub COCONUT GROVE APT. CONDOMINIUM Port. of lots 1,2 & 3, Blk. 41, Unless otherwise stated the address for Desc. Beg. NEly corner of lot 1, all the owners listed below are shown S"38 deg., E 175ft., S 51 deq., below. W 60.30ft S 38deg E 6.10ft S 51 2666 Tigertail Avenue deg, W 19.55ft. N 38 deg W 6.10ft Coconut Grove, Fla. 33133 S 51deg, N 38deg. W 175ft. N 51deg E 140ft to POB. 5) Unit 101 Gart Urban 6) Unit 102 G. Valdes Fauli, Jr. 7) Unit 103 Jose Szapocznik 8) Unit 104 Christopher & J. Hempstead 9) Unit 105 Joseph L. Pallant 4000 N.E. 2nd Ave Miami, Fla. 33137 10) Unit 106 M.C. & Cindy Goldberg 11) Unit 107 Soil Overseas Investment 12) Unit 108 Donna Holman 13) Unit 109 Matthew & Tari Rinder 14) Unit 110 Edgar Miller 15) Unit 111 Ann L. Gallagher 16) Unit 112 Ira & Donna Rosenberg 17) Units 114 & 115 Michael & Cindy Goldberg 18) Unit 201 Patrick Jay 19) Unit 202 Matson International Corp. 20) Unit 203 D.A. Lynn & B. N. Ver Ploeg Et. Al. 21) Unit 204 Miguel R. Hernandez 22) Unit 205 Leslie Libman 23) Unit 206 D.IJ. & Gloria Ann Matson, Jr. - 9 - 82-751 Page Ten 0 COCONUT GROVE APT. CONDOMINIUM Port. of lots 1, 2 & 3, Blk 41 Desc. Beg. NEly corner of lot 1, S 38 deg. E 175ft., S 51 deg., W 60.30ft., S 38 deg., E 6.10ft. S 51 deg., W 19.55ft. N 38 deg., W 6.10ft., S 51 deg., N 38 deg., W 175ft., N 51 deg., E 140ft. to DOB. 1) Unit 207 2) Unit 208 3) Unit 209 4) Unit 210 5) Unit 211 6) Unit 212 7) Unit 214 8) Unit 215 SCHOONER PORT CONDOMINIUM Lots 7 & 8, Blk. F. RHODES AMENDED PLAT OF NE14 BISCAYNE PB B/16. 9) Unit A 10) Unit B 11) Unit C 12) Unit D 13) Unit E 14) Unit F 15) Unit G 16) Unit H 17) Unit J 18) Unit K 2666 Tigertail Avenue Coconut Grove, Fal. 33133 Unless otherwise stated the address for all the below listed owners are shown above. Larry Jay Jack Dietz Judy W. Koehler Paul M. Hoffenberg J.M. Fine ' Ernest Swietelsky Michael Bloom Richard H. Simons 2679 Tigertail Avenue Coconut Grove, Fla. 33133 Unless other wise stated the address for all of the below listed owners are shown above. Sandra Sarkisian Michael S.-Greene D.R. Boswell & T.J. Fournaris Teresa Demills Sheldon Haffner John & Joan Kmieck Angel & Carolina Clarens, Jr. 6143 - 30th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20015 Lodovico & Maria Blanc Angel & Lourdes Clarens 6143 - 30th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20015 Brian & Deborah Goldner 255 Alhambra Circle Suite 100 Coral Gables, Fla. 33134 - 10 - 82- 751 .�r 1 -4 -!' m �� \ ow �� /�� Arr t AAL r 4N 0 11' "W09% 9 l,, 'L _ _ _I �1 �/-1_J 1 —7 — `� 4�,j 1 • / 3,AVE. ` R'tq vt i 1 }a W e! EVE se ,9.b 1�` ,� �' jPc• 6' .R� `,F A VI — 7- Alafn iLl r4, \ -' % woe 10 Ak �� _ s_ aA_✓_ AV d[p \ 47 CA Ll s r 5 t5- - - \ \ o • \ \� ,f Qi■■. _ A P K G �'� a \6 � � �, •�� ' r �/ \\� ,� ` \ VE 1) 1 - 41 rl — — — \ \\ \ \ tt \ 116 ❑ol•y,�. , \ YEi_Lfi'v, - ',!BHCLPTY GREEN I'ROPERTILS .!IjOSE OWNERS HAVE `�I��Ef� CONSE'11T TO REZOIII14G SUBJECT PROPLRTY 10 R-C. ;;OTE : In <:,+sr: cf condominium: ail im i v o�,ncrs have not signed _ _. Or !,-en contacted. 82-'751