HomeMy WebLinkAboutO-09497* at
ORDINANCE N0, g 4 9 7
AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING
CHAPTER 37 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI,FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, BY
THE ADDITION OF A NEW SECTION 37-
70 ENTITLED "STANDING IN LINE FOR
PROFIT", PROHIBITING THE STANDING
IN LINE FOR VALUE IN FRONT OF A14
OFFICE OR COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENT
WITHIN THE CITY OF MIAMI; CONTAINING
A REPEALER PROVISION AND A,9.EVERA-
BILITY CAUSE.
�JHEREAS, the practice of persons, for personal
profit, exchanging their place in lines outside govern-
ment agencies or commercial establishments is unfair to
individuals who cannot afford such services, disrupts
government activities, undermines individual equities,
generates hostility, and threatens the peace in public
areas; and
I-MEREAS, these conditions or activities present
an immediate and urgent danger to the residents of the
City of Miami.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. Chapter 37 of the Code of the City of
Miami, Florida, as amended, is hereby amended by the
addition of a new section, 37-70, to read as follows:
"Sec. 37-70. Standing in Line for
Profit.
No person shall, directly or
indirectly, exchange for money or
anything of value, his or her place
in line which has been formed on any
public property outside of a govern-
ment office or a commercial establish-
ment within the City of Miami."
Section 2. All ordinances or parts of ordinances
insofar as they are inconsistent or in conflict with the
provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed.
W
Section 3. if any part of this Ordinance is
declared invalid, the remaining provisions of this
Ordinance shall not be affected.
Section 4. This Ordinance is hereby declared to
be an emergency measure on the ground of urgent public
need for the preservation of peace, health, safety, and
the property.
Section 5. The requirements of reading of this
Ordinance on two separate days is hereby dispensed with
by a vote of not less than four -.fifths of the members of
the Commission.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 23 day of SeptembeA
1982.
A{auA i.ce A. Foote
MAURICE A. FERRE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
PREPARED., -AND APPROVED BY:
LgCIA T. ALLEN
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS:
AGARCIA-PEDROSA
TORNEY
LTA:sd
U
Witt OF k"AM1,
6ADIP " fUi TY, FLORIDA
AL &GAL 111116tift
All Ihlereated will take hollde that on the 28rd dAy of topte tlhee,
1982, the City c6fhlhi§&I0n of Miami, Florida adopted the following
titled ordinahaes:
ORDINANCE NO. 9492
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 6871, AS
AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE
FOR THE CITY OF MIAMI, BY CHANGING THE CONING
CLASSIFICATION OF LOTS 25, 26 AND 27, BLOCK 1;
HOLLEMAN MANOR (10.30) SUBDIVISION, BEING
APPROXIMATELY 35IX) NORTHWEST 22NO AVENUE, FROM
R-3 (LOW DENSITY MULTIPLE DWELLING) TO 04 (GENERAL
COMMERCIAL); AND 13Y MAKING ALL THE NECESSARY
CHANGES IN THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP MADE A PART
OF SAID ORDINANCE NO. 6871, BY REFERENCE AND
DESCRIPTION IN ARTICLE Ili, SECTION 2, THEREOF, BY
REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES, CODE SECTIONS OR PARTS
THEREOF IN CONFLICT AND CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE.
ORDINANCE NO. 9493
MIAMI REVIEW
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 6871, AS
AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE
FOR THE CITY OF MIAMI, BY CHANGING THE ZONING
AND DAILY RECORD
CLASSIFICATION OF TRACTS 1 AND 2 LESS THE EASTERLY
Published Daily except Saturday, Sunday and
117.5' THEREOF; TENTATIVE PLAT NO, 1124.8 "A.C.
SUBDIVISION'; BEING APPROXIMATELY 3200 NORTH MIAMI
Legal Holidays
AVENUE, FROM R-2 (TWO FAMILY DWELLING) TO C-5
Miami, Dade County. Florida
(LIBERAL COMMERCIAL); AND BY MAKING THE
STATE OF FLORIDA
NECESSARY CHANGES IN THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
MADE A PART OF SAID ORDINANCE NO.
COUNTY OF DADE:
6871, BY
REFERENCE AND DESCRIPTION IN ARTICLE 3, SECTION
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared
2, THEREOF, BY REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES, CODE
Dianna Stuver, who on oath says that she is the Assistant to
SECTIONS, OR PARTS THEREOF IN CONFLICT AND
the Publisher of the Miami Review and Daily Record, a daily
CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE.
(except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) newspaper,
published at Miami In Dade County, Florida; that the attached
copy of advertisement, being a Legal Advertisement of Notice
ORDINANCE NO. 9494
In the matter of
CITY OF MIAMI
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 6871, AS
AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE
Re - ORDIN-ANCE NO. 9497
FOR THE CITY OF MIAMI, BY CHANGING THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF LOTS 35 THROUGH 40, BLOCK 4;
BRADDOCK'S SUB NO. 4 (3.63): BEING APPROXIMATELY
1471 NORTHWEST 17TH STREET, FROM 8.3 (LOW DENSITY
MULTIPLE) TO R-5 (HIGH DENSITY MUTIPLE), AND BY
MAKING ALL THE NECESSARY CHANGES IN THE ZONING
in the X X X Court,
DISTRICT MAP MADE A PART OF SAID ORDINANCE NO.
was published in said newspaper In the issues of
6871 BY REFERENCE AND DESCRIPTION IN ARTICLE 111,
SECTION 2, THEREOF; BY REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES,
Oct. 1, 1982
CODE SECTIONS, OR PARTS THEREOF IN CONFLICT, AND
CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE.
ORDINANCE NO. 9495
Affiant further says that the said Miami Review and Daily
Record is a newspaper published at Miami in said Dade County,
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 6871, AS
Florida, end that the said newspaper has heretofore been
AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE
continuously published in said Dade County. Florida, each day
(except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) and has been
ice In
entered as second class matt matter at the post office
FOR THE CITY OF MIAMI, BY CHANGING THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF PORTIONS OF PINE TERRACE
County.lor on foryear
MiamiinsadDadety. Florida,
rta period of
(57.65);
LES SUBDIVISION (61.56); RESOZO SUBDIVISION (63.53)
precedingnext Copy
advertisement; and y e r further says that she has neither
nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount,
AND THAT PORTION OF UNPLATTED LAND AS DESCRIBED
ON FILE WITH THE PLANNING AND
paid
rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this
ZONING BOARDS
ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT; BEING 2810-2824.2840
advertisement for publication Ih said newspaper.
i11 ITi41!!r
SOUTHWEST 27TH AVENUE AND 2727-2737.2741.2743-
2801.2815 SOUTHWEST 28TH TERRACE, FROM R-4 (MEDIUM
�. L`rra.d•..L` st���t`s t.`...... .
$w` is gnd.'sugserlbed before me this
DENSITY MULTIPLE); RCC (RESIDENTIAL -OFFICE) AND C-2
(LOCAL COMMERCIAL) TO SPD-6 (COCONUT GROVE RAPID
1st day of :, ..,. ;.:.. A.D. is 82
TRANSIT DISTRICT), AND BY MAKING THE NECESSARY
CHANGES iN THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP MADE APART
OF SAID ORDINANCE NO, 6871, BY REFERENCE AND
• . ,
DESCRIPTION IN ARTICLE III, SECTION 2, THEREOF; BY
it r o s
aryubllc, of Florida at Large
REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES, CODE SECTIONS, OR PARTS
,Stale
THEREOF IN CONFLICT, AND CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY
(SEAL) .� `
My Commission expires June; :1,1983:
CLAUSE.
ORDINANCE NO. 9496
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 5-47, 5.49,_5.58,
5.59 AND 5.61 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI,
FLORIDA, AS AMENDED BY ENLARGING THE MEMBERSHIP
OF THE CITY OF MIAMI PROFESSIONAL BOXING AND
WRESTLING BOARD FROM 5 MEMBERS TO 11 MEMBERS
WITH SAID MEMBERS BEING SUBJECT TO REMOVAL
WITHOUT CAUSE BY THE CITY COMMISSION; PROVIDING
THAT BOARD MEMBERS AND THE SECRETARY -TREASURER
BE REIMBURSED FOR ACTUAL EXPENSES INCURRED IN
THE PERFORMANCE OF THEIR OFFICIAL DUTIES;
PROVIDING THAT THE BOND REQUIRED TO BE POSTED
BY A PROMOTER FOR AN EXHIBITION,, CONTEST,
ENCOUNTER OR SHOW MAY BE IN THE FORM OF A
SURETY BOND; PROVIDING THAT THE ADMISSION TAX
BE INCREASED FROM 2% TO 3% OF THE PAID APMISSI(QN
CHARGED FOR ANY €XHIBITION,.CONT€ST, ENCOUNTER
OR SHOW; PROVIDING THAT RUI 96 AND REGULATIONS
ADOPTED AND ADMINISTERED $Y SAiQQARR t€
APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION PEFOR€ B€COMING
€FF€CT.IV€ CONTAINING A REPEALER PRO V151QN; s
S€V[:RABIl-1TY Cl.A1t115E; AND DISPENSING WITH TH .
R€QIJiREMENT OF READING SAME ON 2 6FPAaRATE PAYE
13Y AN AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF NOT L€SS THAN FO IE=
MR 116
FIFTHS OF THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMis SIQN=
L3
ORDINANCE NO.9497
AN EMOMCY ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 37
OF THE CODEOrTHE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS
AMENDED, by tHE AbDItION OF A NEW SECTION 37.70
ENt)tLEO "STANDING IN LINE FOR PROFIT", PROHIBITING
tHE STANDING IN LINE FOR VALUE IN FRONT OF AN
OFFICE OR COMMERCIAL WABLISHMENt WITHIN THE
CITY OF MIAMI; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION
AND A SEVERABILItY CLAUSE.
ORDINANCE NO.9498
ORDINANCE NO. 6871, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHEN-
SIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, ARTICLE
IV, SECTION 17 (ENTITLED "FENCES, WALLS AND HEDGES'j,
SUBSECTION (4), IS HEREBY AMENDED BY DELETING
EXISTING SUBSECTION (4) AND INSERTING IN LIEU
THEREOF A. NEW SUBSECTION (4) ELIMINATING THE
PERMISSIVE USE OF BARBED WIRE; EXCEPT FOR
CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT;
BY MAKING THE NECESSARY CHANGES IN THE ZONING
DISTRICT MAP MADE A PART OF SAID ORDINANCE NO.
6871 BY REFERENCE AND DESCRIPTION IN ARTICLE.I11,
SECTION 2, THEREOF, AND BY REPEALING ALL
ORDINANCES, CODE SECTIONS, OR PARTS THEREOF IN
CONFLICT AND CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE.
ORDINANCE NO. 9499
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF THE CITY OF
MIAMI, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING CHAPTER 62,
"PLANNING AND ZONING", ARTICLE VI, "ZONING FEES".
SECTION 62.61, "SCHEDULE OF FEES", BY ADDING A
NEW SUBSECTION TO PROVIDE FOR A SURCHARGE IN
THE FEE SCHEDULE AND BY AMENDING SECTION 62.62
"REQUEST FOR REVIEW"; MORE PARTICULARLY, BY
AMENDING THE FIRST PARAGRAPH OF SAID SECTION
62.62 TO PROVIDE THAT IF A PROPERTY OWNER WITHIN
375 FEET OF A PROPERTY INVOLVED IN A DECISION OF
THE ZONING BOARD APPEALS THE DECISION TO THE
CITY COMMISSION THEN NO FEE SHALL BE CHARGED;
BY REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES, CODE SECTIONS, OR
PARTS THEREOF IN CONFLICT AND CONTAINING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE.
ORDINANCE NO. 9500
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING COMPREHENSIVE ZONING
ORDINANCE 6871, AS AMENDED, AND SUBSTITUTING
THEREFORE A NEW ZONING ORDINANCE, TO BE KNOWN
AND CITED AS "THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA;" CONTAINING AUTHORITY, INTENT
AND PURPOSE AND SHORT TITLE SECTIONS; REGULATING
STRUCTURES; USES AND OCCUPANCIES; HEIGHT AND
BULK; DENSITY; LOT COVERAGE; LOT AREA PER
DWELLING UNIT; PARKING; SIGNS; PROVIDING FOR
OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS AND OFFICIAL SCHEDULE OF
DISTRICT REGULATIONS; ZONING DISTRICTS; PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS; SPECIAL PUBLIC INTEREST
DISTRICTS; HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT; GENERAL
REGULATIONS; NON -CONFORMITIES; FURTHER
PROVIDING FOR FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF
COMMISSION, OFFICERS, AND BOARDS; SPECIAL
PERMITS; FURTHER PROVIDING FOR APPEALS FROM
DECISIONS OF PLANNING DEPARTMENT, ZONING BOARD
AND CITY COMMISSION; PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT,
VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES; AMENDMENTS; DEFINITIONS;
REPEALING ALL OTHER LAWS AND PARTS THEREOF IN
CONFLICT, PROVIDING FOR A. RESORT TO REMEDIES
CLAUSE, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE 180
DAYS AFTER RECEIPT OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT THAT THIS
ORDINANCE HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE SECRETARY OF
STATE.
ORDINANCE NO. 9501
AN ORDINANCE DEFINING AND DESIGNATING THE
TERRITORIAL LIMITS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI FOR THE
PURPOSE OF TAXATION; FIXING THE TENTATIVE MILLAGE
AND LEVYING TAXES IN THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA,
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 1982,
AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1983; CONTAINING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE,
ORDINANCE NO. 9502
AN ORDINANCE MAKING TENTATIVE APPROPRIATIONS
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1983;
CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION; AND A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE,
60INANCE NO.9503
AN ORDINANCE DEFINING AND DESIGNATING THE
TERRITORIAL LIMITS OF THE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF MIAMI LOCATED WITHIN THE
TERRITORIAL LIMITS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI FOR THE
PURPOSE OF TAXATION, FIXING THE MILLAGE AND
LEVYING TAXES IN THE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT LOCATED WITHIN THE TERRITORIAL LIMITS
OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA. FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 19B2, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER
30, 1983; FIXING THE MILLAGE AT FIFTY ONE -HUNDREDTHS
(.50) MILLS ON THE DOLLAR OF THE NONEXEMPT
ASSESSED VALUE OF ALL REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY
IN SAID DISTRICT AND PROVIDING THAT THE SAID
MILLAGE AND THE TAXES LEVIED HEREIN SHALL BE IN
ADDITION TO THE FIXING OF THE MILLAGE AND THE
LEVYING OF TAXES WITHIN THE TERRITORIAL LIMITS
OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, WHICH IS CONTAINED IN THE
GENERAL APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE FOR THE
AFORESAID FISCAL YEAR AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 30
OF THE CITY CHARTER; PROVIDING THAT THE FIXING
OF THE MILLAGE AND LEVYING OF TAXES HEREIN SHALL
BE IN ADDITION TO SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR
IMPROVEMENTS IMPOSED BY THE CITY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF MIAMI WITHIN THE TERRITORIAL LIMITS
OF THE CITY OF MIAMI: PROVIDED THAT THIS ORDINANCE
SHALL NOT BE DEEMED AS REPEALING OR AMENDING
ANY OTHER ORDINANCE FIXING MILLAGE OR LEVYING
TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1,
1982 AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1983 BUT SHALL BE
DEEMED SUPPLEMENTAL AND IN ADDITION HERETO;
AND PROVIDING THAT IF ANY SECTION, CLAUSE OR
SUBSECTION SHALL BE DECLARED UNCONSTITUTIONAL,
IT SHALL NOT AFFECT THE REMAINING PROVISIONS OF
THIS ORDINANCE.
ORDINANCE NO. 9504
AN ORDINANCE MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER
30, 1983; AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF THE
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TO INVITE OR
ADVERTISE FOR BIDS FOR THE PURCHASE OF ANY
MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT OR SERVICE EMBRACED IN THE
SAID APPROPRIATIONS FOR WHICH FORMAL BIDDING
MAY BE REQUIRED PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE
SHALL BE SUPPLEMENTAL AND IN ADDITION TO THE
ORDINANCE MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1983 FOR THE OPERATION
OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: PROVIDING THAT IF
ANY SECTION, CLAUSE OR SUBSECTION SHALL BE
DECLARED UNCONSTITUTIONAL, IT SHALL NOT AFFECT
THE REMAINING PROVISIONS OF THIS ORDINANCE.
RALPH G. ONGIE
n? CITY CLERK
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA
Publication of this Notice on the 1st day of October 1982.
1011 M82.100108
4 i
CitY bi" M1.1iv11, f=l.C)iiibA � , •�/ 1 -ems
.` f :.
1-ln 'i]'d Garr, _ cafiE: September 160 1982 riLE
��.
City Manager P111 J
ua.E�t INS Problem Dealing with 7`7
Obstruction of City of Miami'--- "
Sidewalks
Maurice A, A
J+11
FCrrI;1�/�I�1' REFERENCES:
Mayor
ENCLOSURES
I feel that the licensing of individuals to stand in line at the INS doi%n-
toi.n Miami office is absurd.
In the first place, I don't think this represents a legitimate occupational
licensing situation. At best, the services rendered are questionable.
I further object to the implication of selectiveness whereby affluent persons
who are able to pay the so-called stand-ins have preference over people unable
to pay.
Lastly, I object to the alleged abuse by some stand-ins in pulling switchblades
----the insertion of five applicants in the line rather than one, etc., etc.
Either you or an Assistant City Tanager should sit dog%n with a high-level re-
sponsible person at INS to try to work out a proper plan.
I would suggest that we offer the following solution:
1) That there be no lines on the street.
2) That instead of waiting on the street, an applicant be permitted inside the
building to obtain a number which will give him a date and certain time for
his interview.
3) That no one be allowed to either disrupt traffic or the flow of pedestrians on
Miami sidewalks, nor to violate the City of Miami fire codes inside the INS
office.
I would like for the Law Department to tell us if we can cite the INS officer in
charge, and hold him responsible for violations of City ordinances.
Lastly, I find it totally unacceptable for the INS, in its t)Tical buck -passing
way, to create a problem through its lack of proper management, and to then drop
it on the City of Miami. The streets of Miami are not waiting lines for the INS
or any other federal agency, and we should strictly enforce that rule.
I intend to bring up this matter at the special City Commission meeting to be held
Friday evening.
MAF:pas -
cc: All Commission Members
9497