The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutO-09507AM ORDINANCE NOt��vi AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2 OF PROPOSED CITY CHARTER AMENDMENT NO, 1, KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO, 948,9,,ADOPTE�b SEPTEMBER 175 1982 y PROVIDING THAT tRt , CITY MANAGER BE — REQUIRED TO SET FORTH REASONS IN HIS .WRITTEN FINDING TRAT COMPETITIVE SEALED EIDDtNG IS �T NOT PRACTICABLE OR IS NOT ADVANTAGE0U510 THE CITY. WHERE CONTRACTS ARE To BE AWARDED FOR THE.CITY'S PROCVREMENT.OF PERSONAL PROP- - ERTY; FURTHER PROVIDING THAT THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE SHALL B$ RESPONSIBLE FOR DEVELOPING A MINORITY PROCUREMENT PROGRAM AS MAY BE PRESCRIBED BY ORDINANCE AND PERMITTED BY LAW IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE AWARD OF CON- TRACTS FOR UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING THAT IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS ORDINANCE NO, 9489 REMAINS UNCHANGED, WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 9489, setting forth a proposed Charter Amendment No. l by amending Sections 3,. 52 and 53:, of the Charter of the City of Miami providing for a com- preliensive'procurement'procedure, was adopted on Septem- ber 17, 1982, and is subject to a referendum to be held, Novmber 2, 1982; and WHEREAS, the City Commission finds .that it is in 'the best interest of the City and its citizens to amend such proposed Charter Amendment No. l contained'in Ordinance No. 91489 by adopting the herein changes prior to, the said refer- endum; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE.COMMISSION'OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section,1. That Section 2 of. Ordinance No., 9489`, adopted September 17, 1982, proposing Charter Amendment No. 1 to the, Charter of the City of Miami is hereby amended. by amending proposed new subsections (a) and (e) of Section 1/ 53, as follows: — '- — .> •- �:.- e- — -- r .,..- r e- w- e- .r- - — - r e- — —. — r r- ,- T .+ — T- cr r, r,�.. rr T -r. r r r .,,• +� r.. � •� r r 2 e+ — w..s+.�.- 1/ Words and/or figures stricken through shall ba deleted, f± Underscored words and/or figures: shall be added, ' Aemain 4 ing provisions are now In effect and remain un,chan$.e�,' Asterisks indicate omitted and. unchanged mater-J.aI,,. a :- f. �Y Potsdingi :PtbpOttY, Any personal property, including but not littiited to supplies, equiptfient5 materials and, printed tnattet5 may be obtained by contract of through city labor and mAtetialss as pr6vided.by4:otdi- naftce4 All contracts for more tlld,ti four thousand five hundred dollars ($4,500,00) shall be awarded to the lowest responsible biddety After public notice and using such competitive sealed bidding methods as may be prescribed by ordinances but the city,manAger or his designee shall have the power to reject all bids. Notwithstanding the koteg .goingi the city manager may waive competitive sealed bidding methods by making a written' find- ing which shall contain reasons supporting his conclusion that competitive sealed bidding is not practicable or not advantageous to the city, which finding must be ratified by an :affirmative vote of two-thirds of the commission after A' properly advertised public hearing. When competi- tive sealed bidding methods are waived) other procurement methods as may be prescribed by, ordinance shall be followed. All invitations for bids, requests for proposals or other soli- citations shall contain a reservation of the foregoing right to reject all offers. Contracts for personal property shall be signed by the city, manager or his designee after approval thereof by the commission. This section shall not apply to transfers to the United States,.or any de= partment or agency thereof, to the State.,of: Florida or any political subdivision or agency thereof. (c) Unified Development Projects. Unified.development project shall mean a `prof e c t,. where an interest in real property is owned,.or is to be acquired by the city, and is to be used for the development of improvements, and'where the commission determines that for the develop ment of said improvements it is most advantageous to the city that,the city procure from a.privateL person, as defined in the Code of the. City: of. Miami -one or more of the following integrated. packages: planning And design construction, and leasing; or 1Z planning and design, leasing, and management, or (iii) planning and design, construction,. and manage- ment; or J i.v) planning and design,ion leasing, construct and management. So long as the persom from which the, city 0 procures one of the above mentioned iTi- tegrated packages provides all of the functions listed for that package', such. AR M -2- person heed .not provide each listed fUftctioti for the et! tite'unifled' developmett project riot forthe sate Part of the unified develop ment project, Requests tot proposals for .unit ied devel- opment projects shall generally define the nature of ttte uses the city is seeking tot _ the unified development project and the estimated allocations of land. fot each useY. They shall also state the following: (i) The specific parcel of land edntem- ;r plated to be used or the geographic' area the city desires to develop.pur= suant to the unified development project. — (ii) The specific evaluation criteria .to be used by the below -mentioned ~certi-- — f ied public accounting firm, (iii) The specific evaluation criteria to be.used by the below -'mentioned review committee: (iv) The extent of the cityts proposed commit` ment of funds, property, and services. (v) The definitions of the terms, "substan- tial increase" and "material alteration" that will apply to the project pursuant to sub -section (e)(iv) hereof. (vi) A reservation of the right to reject. all proposals and of -the right of ter-, — mination referred to in sub -section. — (e)(iv), below.. After public notice there shall be a public hearing at.which the commission shall .consider: (i) The contents of the request for pro- — posals for the: subject :unified devel-. opment project; (ii) The selection of a certified public accounting firm, which shall include. at least one member with previous ex- perience in_ the type of:development,: in question. (iii) The, recommendations of the city mana- ger for the appointment of per ons to serve on the review committee. review committee shall consist .of an appropriate number:. of city officials. or employees.and-an equal number ,pl'us = names shall be sumitted by the 'city — manager no fewer than .five .days prior, to the above-mentionedpublic hearing, -3- — _ th. request rot -proposals, b—L--t- lit accounting firm, and 60POiftt the members Of the review committee only from among the: per- son.-. recommended by the city tnAtAdget the procedure for the selection of an inte- grated package proposal shall be as follows: All proposals shall be atialyted by a certified public,accouriting fitt apt (iv) pointed by the commission based, only on the evaluation criteria applicable to said certified public accounting firm contained in the request for pro- posals Said certified public account- ing firm shall render, a written report of its findings to the city manager. The review committee shall evaluat�e each proposal based only on the eval- uation criteria applicable to said review committee contained in the request for proposals., Said review - Committee shall rende,r a written re- port to the city manager of its eval-- uation of each proposal, including any minority opinions. Taking into consideration the findings of the aforementioned certified public accounting firm and the evaluations of the aforementioned revieW'committee, the city manager shall recommend one or more of the proposals for acceptance by the commission, or alternatively, the city manager may recommend that all proposals be rejected. if there are three or more proposals and the city, 0- manager recommends only one, or if he. recommends rejection of all proposals: the city. manager shall state 'in writing the reasons for his recommendation. In transmitting his recommendation or recommendations to the Commission,, the city manager, shall include the write ten reports, including. any minority opinions, rendered,to him by the.,alfore- mentioned certified accounting firm and review committee. All contracts for:unifieddevelopment' projects sball,be awarded to the person whose proposal is most advantage,ous to the city, as determined by the commis-. Sion. The commission may accept any recom- mendation of the city manager by an'af-: firmative vote of a majority 'of its members. In the event the commission, does not accept a proposailr4commend9d by the city manager or does not reject all proposals, the,commission shall seek recommendations directly from the tilt .............. Ul c it 1.. 1. V Ll fitti and the evaluation criteria specie. fied for the review committee in the request tot.ptoposals+ After receiving the direct tecotn_ mendations of the review gomhtitteej the commission shall by an affitmg- tine vote of a majority of its members: l) Accept any recommendation of tiie ■ review committee, or 2) Accept any previous recommendation of the city manager; or 3) Reject all proposals. All contracts for unified develo- ment projects shall be signed by the city manager ,or his',designee after approval thereof by the commis_s-ion. The city manager or his designee_ shall be responsible for developing a mi- n rity procurement program as maybe prescribed by ordinance and permitted by Taw in conjunction with the award of contracts for unified development projects. The provisions of this charter section shall supersede any other charter or code provision to the contrary. Section 2. If any section, part of section,. paragraph,. sentence, clause, phrase or word of this ordinance is de- clared invalid, the remaining provisions shall not be affected.' Section 3. In all other respects, Ordinance. No. 9489 remains unchanged. Section 4. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an emergency measure on the grounds of urgent,' 'ublic -need for the preservation of 'peace, health, safety, and property'of... the City of Miami, and upon the further grounds of.the necessity to,make the required and necessary payments to its employees and officers, payment of its contracts, payment. of „ interest and principal on its debts, necessary and required purchases of goods and supplies, and to generally carry, ..g- F '�3E MIAMI REVIEW AND bAILY RECOAO Published Daily except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays Miami, bade County, Florida. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF DADE: before the undersigned Authority personally appeared Octeltna.V. Ferbeyre,lvtto on oath says that she Is tM Supervisor, Legal Advertising of the Miami Review and Daily Record, a dsfly (except Saturday, Sunday and legal Holidays) newspaper, published" At Miami In Dads County, Florida; that the Attached copy of advertisement, being a Legal Advertisement of Notice In the matter of CITY OF MIAMI' Re: ORDINANCE NO. 9507 In the ........ . X ..... . ................ Court, was published In said newspsper In the Issues of Nov."3, 1982 Affiant further says that the said Miami Review and Daily Record Is a rwwspaper published at Miami In said Dade County, Florida; and that the said newspaper has heretofore bnn continuously published in said Dads County, Florida, each day (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) and has been enteral %second class mall matter at the post office .in Miami In said Dade County, Florida, for &.period of one year next- preceding the first publication of the attached copyy of advertisement. and afflant further says that she has nafther paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, ZbaI , commI on or refund or purpose of securing this v}f�INment lor' publleati he Id newspaper. Sworn to and subserlbsd before me this 3rd Novi' AD. tt►....... 82 ay �... r 1ty JBtookra ........ , otary Public,. State of Florida at Large (SEAL) My Commission,axpirn'June'1,.19e9. MA 113I .. Ott f .�- DAM 66UNIV LkbA1v ilT f IF Afl,lllt6rAsttSd Will 66fId6 thlit tlft th9."Z9th dtiy 61 O616bdf;. 1�11Z, thA Cray Cbtiil IM116h 61 MIAMI, (=l6FIdAAd6of4d tho-1611bVufP1� titidd Odlilahtd iE= CSRDlNANCENO, 69 AN OPbINANCr AMENCiNG 15Ri�lNANty€ Nt::68fI, AS .AMEND€b, THE.0OMPREHI=NSiV>; BONING Ol�6INANCE, FOR THE CITY Or MIAMI, ,BY CHANGING THE.'2ON1NO ice= CLASSIFICATION OF TH'E AREA,L'OCATED APPA6XIMAttLY., AT 581.NORTHEAST 62Nb S�'BEEt,' ALSO D€SCPIf�ED„AS LOT 161 BLOCK % NORTHGATE (8-88), FROM Alc , . (RESID€NTIAL=OFFICE) TO 0-1 (LOCAL COMMEf3CiAL),,AND BY MAXING,THE NECESSARY CHANGES IN TWE:ZONI"NG ' DISTRICT MAP MADEA FART Of= SAID bRbINANCE Nb: 6611 BY REFERENoE ANb' bESORIPTION iN ARTICLE III; SECTION 2 THEREOF; BY.REPtALING ALL ORDINANCES," CODE SECTIONS, OR PARTS THEREOF IN CONFLIOT AND CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. ORDINANCE NO, 9506 AN OA NANCE"AMENOIN6 ORDINANCE NO: 6811 AS;,:„ AMENDE0,1HE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE;, FOR .THE CITY OF MIAMI, BY CHANGING THE: ZONING CLASSIFICATION"OF THE AREA'APPROXIMATELY BOUNDED BY NORTHWEST.3RD COURT,'" A LINE Bra' !t:. NORTH 'OF AND PARALLEL TO NORTHWEST 22ND LANE; NORTHWEST:.":: 5TH AVENUE -,AND NORTHWEST '22ND..STREET; ALSO DESCRIBED AS THE WEST .5' OF LOT 12, BLOCK'1,''AND ALL OF BLOCKS 2 AND 3; ANb'LOT 11; BLOCK",4, WEAVER`_ FIRST ADDITION (UNRECORDED PLAT),;AND LOT 11, BLOCK;,,'; 1 AND BLOCKS.2 AND WEAVER SUB (6 31),ANO'BLOCKS, ...`° C AND D, J,A, DANNS SECOND ADD. (3=25); FROM Rd (MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE) AND G5 (LIBERAL COMMERCIAL) TO 1A (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL)' ALL:'A,S PER.TENTATIVE"PLAT' N1152•A; ."MIAMI FASHION CENTER SECTION 1' 'AND BY MAKING ALL :THE NECESSARY CHANGES IN_THE ZONING_ DISTRICT. MAP MADE A PART. OF SAID'ORDINANCE'NO.:` 687,1, BY REFERENCE AND DESCRIPTION,IN ARTLCLE.Ill' SECTION 2; AND BY REPEALING ALL,ORDINANCES; CObE ° :. SECTIONS;,OR PARTS THEREOF IN.'CONFLICT AND CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY,CLAUSE;._ ;- ORDINANCE N0: 9507, AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2 OF'. PROPOSED CITY :CHARTER AMENDMENT"NO.';,I,' KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO.94891 ADOPTED SEP,TEMBER 17,:1982;",;' PROVIDING THAT THE CITY MANAGER :BEAEQUIRED:TO SET FORTH, REASONS IN HIS WRITTEN FINDING ;THAT COMPETITIVE SEALED, BIDDING IS NOT, PRACTICABLE OR" IS NOT ADVANTAGEOUS TO.THE CITY. WHERE CONTRACTS' ARE TO AWARDED FOR THE CtTY'S_PROCUREMEN.T,OF ,BE PERSONAL PROPERTY; FURTHER: PROVIDING`';THAT THE„ CITY. MANAGER' OR HIS DESIGNEE SHALL BE,RESPONSI" BLE FOR DEVELOPING A .MINORITY PROCUREMENT PRO, GRAM AS MAY BE PRESCRIBED -BY ORDINANCE`AND-PER=;i'`"; MITTED BY. .LAW IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE;AWAFI60 CONTRACTS FOR UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS; PRO VlDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING THAT.IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS ORDINANCE N0:9489 REMAINS UNCHANGED: ORDINANCENOi 9566 AN,ORDINANCE:OFTHE CITY QF.MIAMI DETERMININGTQ LEVY, SUNECTTO THE REFERENDUM HEREIN AUT)•iQRIZFp ' :'_. AN ADDITIONAL QNE.'PERCENT.(a%a).SALES TAX 1N TttE , CITY -OF, MIAMI FOR THE PI=RIQp�JANVARY;1,,1983THROLJSati, ,, D.ECEMBER 31, 19$3;'THE,P.RQCEEpS:O;F WHICH.WILL"0 ' USED.TR FINANCE THE CONSTRUQTION OF 4 FQOTSA� STADIUM ANDIOR A, DOWNTOWN EXH1131TIO,N HALT AND10i� A DOWNTOWN COLISEUM ANp10R,A MULTI SPORTS FAC1U' ITY OR AN'. AMPHJTHEATRE" PROVIDING THAT THE REMAINING' FUNQ$. BE..USED FQR P.RQPPTY T,AXFLELIEFI <.;:., PROVIDING FOR GUARANTEEP.MINORI`t'Y PARTI�IP�ITIQN ANI? P.RQVIQINQ FQR'""ThIE MfDt_9ING:'QF A SALES TAM. T REFERENDUM IN HE CITY OF 1y11AMI, FI:QRIPA, QN pEOEMR. BF..R 14,1982;FAR:THE PURFQSE.QF SUSMtfiTINO TS?;Tf�IE 1=I-EIiTQR6 QF :THE:l31T'!' 1?F MIAMI THE 01�EI TION'F WHETHER AN. ADDITIQNAL .,?RfE .PERC.E►NT (1%) 4AtP€S ,TAX FQR TWELVE .MONTt4 >ahiA1-L SE EV11?:FIIAIE TtdF R:EOVEa PRQVIPIN 510, TV, PI �9jolltll� FOR A1>I EFP,FC'rT1VE SATE - - - ORDiNANCE NO, 9560 AN 6MINANdt AMENDING S€CTION 1 6P ORDINANCE N6. 8�19, Ab6PTEb OCTOS%R. 28, 101, tHE SUMMARY GRANt,APPmO mAtION ORIINANCE, AS AMENDED; BY . ESTABLISHING ANEW TRUtt AND AGENCY FUND ENTITLED: "CHARRON WILLIAMS COLLEGE W6kwt?UbY PROGRAM"- APPi�OPR10NG FUNDS POA tHE;OPtAAtION_OF,9AME IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OP &19,580; M-1,848 TO BE RECEIVED, MWCHARRON.WILLIAM9,0OLLEGE AND 37,l312 FROM CITY P)SCAL YEAR 1083 SPECIALlPAOGRAMS.AND , ACCO"UNTS'MATCHING FUNDS F-60 'GRANTS; CONTAININGA REpEA,LER PROVISION AN A SEVERABIL ITY CLAUSE. ORDINANCE NO.9514 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE'NO. 6871, 'AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY "AMENDING SECTION 28, "DOCKS, WHARVES;' ANb DOCKAGE", OF ARTICLE IV, "GENERAL, PROVISIONS OF SAID, ORDINANCE; MORE PARTICULARLY I3Y'AMENbING THE FIRST AND SECOND UNNUMBERED -PARAGRAPHS . OF SUBSECTION (2) OF SAID SECTION 23 AND PARAGRAPH (a) OF SAID SUBSECTION (2) AND SUBPARAGRAPHS 2 AND 3 OF PARAGRAPH (b) OF;SECTION 2 OF, SAID SECTION 23,, PROVIDING THEREBY FOR THE INCLUSION.OF'THE C-1 ZONING DISTRICT AMONG ZONING DISTRICTS TO WHICH SIDE, PROPERTY, LINE SETBACkS' APPLY; FURTHER PRO, VIDING .FOR:THE. DELETION .THEREFROM:OF CERTAIN TERMS REGARDING BULKHEAD AND WATERWAY LINES' AND'THE SUBSTITUTION OF CERTAIN TERMS THEREFOR; 'AND FURTHER PROVIDING THAT LIMITATIONS APPLYING TO PROJECTIONS IN WATERWAYS ALSO APPLY TO CANALS; FURTHER.PROVIDING.THAT FOR PROPERTY IN THE R-5; R-54; AND R-CB ZONING DISTRICTS ABUTTING A PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY OR PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY EXTENDED OR: OTHERWISE1 PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE BY EASEMENT, OR, OTHER APPROVED GRANT, THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS_ MAY BE MODIFIED OR SET ASIDE PROVIDED THAT A "PUB- " LIC BENEFIT IS PROVIDED WHICH IS ACCESSIBLE TO THE: PUBLIC AND BY PROVIDING' THAT THE ZONING BOARD SHALL ASSURE THAT. ADJACENT PROPERTIMAND,THE PUBLIC OBTAIN REASONABLE WATER ACCESS, AND THAT ALL'ACCESS; DOCUMENTS .SHALL BE ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY! LAW, DEPARTMENT' AS TO LEGAL FORM' AND SUFFICIENCY; "CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND:' A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. ORDINANCE_ NO.9511 AN ORDINANCE'AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 6871, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE;::; BY ADDING A NEW PARAGRAPH (9) TO SUBSECTION (7). 7) OF SECTION.1, ARTICLE XI-2, :'RESIDENTIAL -OFFICE,-- R-CB DISTRICT", AND A NEW .PARAGRAPH (1) TO SUBSECTION; ,.. (33) OF'SECTION 1 ARTICLE Xii "LOCAL COMMERCIAL, CA DISTRICL"; TO PERMIT DOCKS AND PIERS TO.EXTEND BEYOND TWENTY-FIVE (25) FEET UPON CONDITIONAL USE . APPROVAL; CONTAINING A REPEALER, PROVISION AND A, , SEVERABILITY. CLAUSE: RALPH G. ONGIE CITY CLERK CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA Publioation:of this Notice on the,3 day of NoVember 1982 1,113 _ ' M82.116347tllllr; n :r;