HomeMy WebLinkAboutO-09505- "n LX%_ .L fA" j M LV W - D 1 Vjr%L\ l L\ V L ALL"
CHANGES IN T14E ZONING DISTRICT MAP MADE
A PART OF' SAID ORDINANCE NO, 6871 BY
REFERENCE AND DESCRIPTION IN ARTICLE III,
SECTION 2 THEREOF; BY REPEALING ALL
ORDINANCES, CODE SECTIONS, OR. PARTS
THEREOF IN CONFLICT AND CONTAINING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE.
WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board at its meet-
ing of September' 1, 1982, Item No. 5 following an adver-
tised hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 51-82 by a 7-0
vote, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of a change of zoning classifi-
cation as hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, :the City Commission after careful considera-
tion of this matter deems it advisable and in the best
interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami and its
inhabitants to grant this change of zoning.classification as
hereinafter set.forth;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. Ordinance No. 6871, as amended, the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance for the City of Miami, is
hereby amended by changing the zoning classification of the
area located approximately at 581 Northeast 62nd,Street,
also described as Lot 16, Block 10, NORTHGATE (8-88), from
R-C (Residential -Office) to C-1 (Local Commercial); and by:
r:
making all the necessary changes in the Zoning District Map,`
,made a .part of said Ordinance No, 6871, by reference and
description in Article III,, Section 2, thereof.
Section. That all Ordinance&, Code Secta QLnS Qx'
L
parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby i=epeeiled
insofar as they are in conflict.
i
aa�
r,
gt
-AEI'
- .. .v,T;;}3"y'<"+ft`:..Kx14'!'�,t-nx:yxntl•';
rY'?y.T:.-,_w.avaM;•-•,,., -
Section 5, Should any part
or provision of this
Ordinance be declared by a court of
competent' jurisctietidri
to be irivalidt the same shall hot affect the validity of the
me
Ordinance as a whole,
PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE
ONLY this 25rd day of
�=
September , 1982
PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND
FINAL, 'READING BY TITLE
„ =
ONLY this 28th day of October
, 1982
Maurice A. Fevre
ATTEST: MAURICE
A. FERRE, Mayor
LPH G. ONGIE
City Clerk
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
4�0O��
L E. MAXWELL
AS"sistant City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS:
- E R. GARCIA-PEDROSA
-
ity Attorney
>t
-
fy
'W
E
E
r
MIAMI REVIEW
AND DAILY RECORD
Published billy except Saturday, Sunday and
Legal Holidays
Miami, bade County, Florida.
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF DAbE
Before the undsratgned 'authority. personally appeared
Deal= V. Ferbsyre, wfa on oath says that the It the Supervlsor,
Legal Advanising of the Miami Review and Daily Record, a
daily (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) newspaper,
published at Miami In Dada County, Florida; that the attached
copy of,adva"Isament, being a Legal Advertisement of Notice
In the matter of
CITY OF MIAMI
Re: ORDINANCE NO. 9505
In the .. .K. X 11. ...... Court,
was published In said newspaper in the Issues of
Nov. 3, 1982
Afflant further says that the said Miami Review and Daily
Record Is s.newspapsr-published'at Miami in said Dade County,
Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore. been
continuously published In ,said Dade County, Florida; each day
(except Saturday, Sunday; and Legal Holidays) and has been
entered as second, class mail L matteratthe. post office in
Miami In said, Dade County, Florida, for a period of one year
next preceding the r first publication of the attached copy of
advertisement; and afflant further says that she has neither
paon id nor promised any persfirm or corporation any discount,
rebels, commission or refund fort purposs of securing this
ad ment for publ�t id newspaper.
��. rr1�
j...........
Swogi to sod abbscrlki�d before me this
3rd day of ....:Novz......... A.D, Is......2
... >
noki r-
,1:� .� . •BNry:7. Br . . •
N sry PYbhw.fita(i of Florida at Large
(SEAL)
My Commission ezPkes:.lwns l;'1803.
111111111444
Irii`1' l��'111U11N1f
LE64 116tI16
Ail 1111069t6d Wiil'tako h6tlea thAt 6ri thR �6th dily Of (St:t bAr,
1982, Iho City C6hi1tu lah Of M19rhl, i=ii ift 6dwad
tttlod bfdih6h6k:
OItOiNANCi` NO. 95b5
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORbINANCE:NO: 601,, At
AMENbtb, THE COMPREHENSIVE 20N1NG'�iRbiNANOE
_
FOR -THE CITY;6P MIAMt; 3Y CHANGING ,tHE 26NINO
CI.ASSIFICATI6N, OF THE AREA 10CAttb APPAIJAMAtkV
At, 681-NORTHEAST 0ND STREEfi 'ALSO btkAl8ED AS ,
LOT,' 16; . BLOCK. 1t5; NWHCiAi'E-(8 881;. FROM: R-,C.;:•.
_
(0981bENtIAL-OPPICE) t C 1 (LOCAL OOMMWIALj;'ANb :"
BY MAKING, THE:N,ECESMAY CHANGES IN _THE TONING.
.'
DISTRICT MAP MADE A PART OF- SAID ORDINANCE; NO:" ,..
—
6871 BY REFERENCE ANO'MCRiPTION.IN ARTICLE III;
SECTION ,2 THEREOF, BY REPEALING ALL`ORDINANCES,
CODE 9P-ttIbNS,OR'PARTS .THEREOF iN OONFLICt AND
CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY. CLAUSE: '
ORDINANCE NO:85b6 :.
AN. ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE' N0:.6871c AS..
AMENDED, THE' COMPREHENSIVE ZONiNO.OROINANCE
FOR THE CITY OF MIAMI, BY CHANGING THE, ZONING. ..:
CLASSIFICATION OF THE AREA APPROXIMATELY: BOUNDED;
BY NORTHWEST'3RD COURT,'A LINE "86` 4NORTH OF "-
AND PARALLEL TO NORTHWEST 22ND LANE, NORTHWEST:
STH AVENUE AND NORTHWEST 22ND STREET;. ALSO.:'.:;
DESCRIBED AS,THE WEST;,5'-OF LOT,12, BLOCKA,.AND;;_';:
_
ALL OF BLOCKS 2 AND 3, AND LOT 11, BLOCK d;'WI±AVER, ..;
FIRST ADDITION (UNRECORDED PLAT), AND'LOT 11, BLOCK,., :::
1'AND BLOCKS '2 AND 3 WEAVER SUB (6.31) AND BLOCKS'
C AND D, J.A. DANNS SECOND ADD, (3.2% FROM R-4 (MEDIUM
DENSITY MULTIPLE) AND C•5.(LIBERALCOMMERCIAQ TO -,
—
1.1_(LIGHT,INDUSTRIAL), ALL AS PER:TENTATIVE" PLAT .
#1152-k!'MIAMI, FASHIOWCENTER. SECTION 1"; AND BY (` :.
MAKING ALL THE NECESSARY CHANGES IN THE ZONING "-:
DISTRICT MAP: MADEA PART OF. SAID..,ORDINANCE NO., `.
' 687i;; BY, REFERENCE AND, DESCRIPTION ;IN.;ARTICLE III;.:,
SECTION 2; AND, BY REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES, CODE
SECTIONS, OR PARTS 7HEREOF.IN`.CONFLICT,AND;;!;;
'CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE:;:,'
ORDINANCE N0: 9507
AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2 0F:.
PROPOSED CITY CHARTER AMENDMENT:_,NO::1 KNOWN':,
AS ORDINANCENO.8488,`AOOPTED.SEPTEMBER,17, 1982:
PROVIDING THAT,THE`CITY. MANAGER BE REOUIRED TO
SET%FORTH:REASONS'IN HIS:WRITTEN FINDING THAT >c
COMPETITIVE SEALED, BIDDING IS NOT PRACTICABLE OR.:
is NOT ADVANTAGEOUS TO THE CITY WHERE CONTRACTS
ARE TO BE AWARDED,FQR THE CITY'S PROCUREMENT OF
PERSONAL PROPERTY; FURTHER. PROVIDING':THAT:.THE.;
CITY MANAGER. OR HIS DESIGNEE SHALL'`;SE'RESPONSI
BLE FOR DEVELOPING:'A MINORITY. -PROCUREMENT PRO..:
GRAM AS MAY BEPRESCRIBED BY,ORDINANCE AND PER `.-;
MITTED, BY: L AW.IN CQNJUNCTION .WITH, THE AWARD OF
CONTRACTS FOR UNIFIED' DEVELOPMENT; PROJECTS; PRO• - .
VIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING THAT,IN ALL OTHER'
RESPECTS ORDINANCE NO.8489 REMAINS UNCHANGED `
ORDINANCE NO 9508
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF,MIAMI,QETERMiNING TD _
I EVY, $UBJECT:TO'THE REFERENDUM HEREINAUTHORIZEQ, '
AN:ADDITIONAI;"ONE PERCENT..(1"lt) $ALSTAX:#N THE
CITY OF MIAMI FOR THE PERIOD.JANUARY Ij .1903 THROUGH
DECENIPER 31, .1883, THE ;PF3Q0rEED,S OF:'Y11H#QH'WILL. SE
USED TO ,FINANCE THE CQNSTRUCTIQN QF A FOOT$At-4�
STADIUM AND/OR A .DQVYNTQWN EXHIPITIQ HAt,.t: Ayl?IO#
A'DQWNTOWN:COLIMM ANOIOR A MUt- 40ORTS. re
ITY. QR.AN AMP.tJTHEATR . PROYlQt.Nt,� THAT THE
R9MAINING FLING,$ $E.�IS..EP FQfl PROPERTY "fltX R 1ri.EF,.: .
PROVIDING FOR CUARANT99D MINORITY.PARTIPIP.ATIQN '!
ANA.PR4VIDING.-FOR Tli$ h#QI:pING QF`A ALES TAX '•
REFERENPVM IN THE CITY VF-MIAM#, FWRIRA, 4AI'Ii?EQIrM•
1 €R 141'19 , FQR THE PU,RRQ699 WOMiT�•!NQ'- O. HE
El-$CTQR$ QF THE#TY;OFTIE:-QUEt�TINF
WHtTHER,AN AQI?iTlQN L QNE'P RC�NT 9°�f3. A E
TAX FQR TINELY,E �MQNTIe� S�4A�44E ll#EQ TQ FJIA,�# "
ThIE-A$42VE� PROV.IPINC FQI + 1fEIlA�ILIi , PN 1JlD1I1i '
F ?R AN VFFECT# QAT :
ORDINANCE NO.0509
AN bAbINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1 bl :bkblNAN6E
NO. 8715; ADOPTED OCtOBER 26; i9l7, THE"SUMMARY '
GRANT APPROPRIATION ORbINANCE, AS AMEND€D; BY
ESTABLISHING A NEW TRUST AND AGENCY, FUNb ENTITLED: ,
"CHARRON WILLIAMS COLLEGE WORK-STUDY"PROGRAW;
APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE OPERATION" OF SAME,
IN THE, TOTAL AMOUNT':OF $39,6w $31,W TO BE RECEIVED.
FROM CHAhkON" WILLIAMS COLLEGE AND $7,912 FROM
CITY FISCAL YEAR 1983 SPECIAL _PROGRAMS, ",AND
.
ACCOUNTS MAtCHING.FUNDS FOR":GRANTS;•
I CONTAINING A'REPEALER PROVISION ANb;A SEVERABIL=
( 1TY CLAUSE':
I ..
{ ORDINANCE NO.0610 `
i.
!: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING;ORDINANCE NO. 6871,.A8 +
.. AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING, ORDINANCE,
I BY AMENDING SECTION 23; i' DOCKS, WHARVES; AND
DOCKAGE" OF ARTICLE'IV."GENERAL PROVISIONS", OF' .
SAID ORDINANCE;.MORE PARTICULARLY BY AMENDING
THE FIRST AND: SECOND UNNUMBERED 'PARAGRAPHS
OF SUBSECTION (2) OF, SAID SECTION 23 AND PARAGRAPH +.
(a) OF SAID SUBSECTION'(2j AND SUBPARAGRAPHS 2 AND
3 OF PARAGRAPH (b) OF SECTION 2 OF. SAID SECTION" 23,;:;
PROVIDING THEREBY FOR "THE `INCLUSION 'OF •THE CA
ZONING DISTRICT AMONG ZONING DISTRICTSTO WHICH
SIDE PROPERTY.LINE SETBACKS APPLY; FURTHER PRO-
VIDING FOR THE DELETION'YHEREFROM"OF;.-CERTAIN —
TERMS REGARDING "BULKHEAD ANO: WATERWAY. UAES- .
AND THE, SUBSTITUTION OF CERTAIN.TERMS THEREFOR,
AND FURTHER PROVIDING THAT LIMITATIONS APPLYING',' TO PROJECTIONS IN WATERWAYS ALSO APPLY TO CANALS;:'
FURTHER PROVIDING THAT FOR PROPERTY, IN THE R-5;
R-5A; AND R-CB ZONING DISTRICTS`ABUTTING APUBLIC.
RIGHT-OF-WAY, OR PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY EXTENDED OR
OTHERWISE' PUBLICLY.; ACCESSIBLE. BY EASEMENT OR
OTHER APPROVED GRANT; THE,SETBACK REOUIR"EMENTS.
MAY BE MODIFIED OR SET ASIDE PROVIDED.THAT"A.PUB-`,` `'
LIC BENEFIT IS PROVIDED WHICH IS ACCESSIBLE TO.THE
PUBLIC AND BY' PROVIDING ;THAT THE ZONING •BOARD:'.`':,.
SHALL ASSURE THAT ADJACENT: PROPERTIES; AND'.THE
PUBLIC OBTAIN REASONABLE W.ATER.ACCESS,`AND THAT
ALL ACCESS DOCUMENTS SHALL BE,.ACCEPTABLETO
THE CITY ,LAW DEPARTMENT AS TO LEGAL FORM' AND"';
SUFFICIENCY;' CONTAINING .A"REPEALER PROVISION AND
A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE.,
ORDINANCE N0.9511
AN ORDINANCE' AMENDING ORDINANCE'NO 6671; AS
AMENDED, THE',COMPREHENSIVE .ZONING ORDINANCE;
BY ADDING A NEW PARAGRAPH.(g) TO SUBSECTION.(7) OF
SECTION 1,,ARTICLE XI.2;''RESIDENTIAL-OFFICE, R-CB .
DISTRICT", AND,A NEW PARAGRAPHIQ ,TO SUBSECTION
(33),OF.SECTION I. ARTICLE�X11, "I:OCAL.COMMERCIAL,
C•1 DISTRICT", TO PERMIT DOCKS AND.PIERS TO EXTEND:
@EYQND.TWENTY•FIVE (25) FEET UPON CONDITIONA�.US€
+� APPROVAL; CONTAINING "AREPEALER PROVISION AND A
:"SEVERA�ILiTY;CLAUSE. �' :'-
R,AWH G: 9NGIE•'
;CITY, CI.ERI<
CITY OF.MIAMI,LORIpA
PY011paIlon pf"ihio NQtiao on the 3 opy o1 N vlam9ar AB�x
11/3 M 11Q3dT
ICvIttWa0F II ICI=
hi"rtMt ANbUNI
t� lanriing Advisory Board
BATE: august 23 i 1982
SOnEt 581 NL 62nd Street
s
terrt5 i September I l�$
FR.'•; oS eph 14, i clManus -
REF`R04CE0:'
.
`Actin; L;;ecutive Secretary
Planning Adv'isor., Board
r
E,,CLbsunEs
The attached fact sheets
are those originally pre-
pared for the larger area
previously recommmeizded.
for approval by the Board.
Inadvertently; Lot 16-
taas omitted from the final
ordinance 49455' adomted
by the Cit+,, Comr1, ission0
This item would correct
that omission.
Jt;"-I/ROt1:/vb
-- Attachments
APPLtC11,'NT,.
P8T IT 1OZi ,
a:
W
REQUE'ST:
BACKGROUND :
City of 1,111ami Planninq bepartmoht
April 15t 1582
APPP,qxV.tNTtLY 6202-098 Bt'SCVZ'Ilt BbOttIVAP101
,Lots 11 through 15
NORT111G,*t1TE 13LX 9 R-EESU8 (5"157)
it, 401 of Lot 11, lots 12
through 16
Block 10,
NORThGATE (8-88)
Change of zoning classification from
R-C RESIDE11TIAL-OVFICr, to C-1 LOCAL
CO,,-,iMV,RCIAL district,
Application of STPD-3 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD
NORTH SPECIAL,OVERLAI' DISTRICT to the
subject property,
and further that this rezoning and
application will be included in the
proposed new zoning ordinance for the
City of Miami, when and 'if enacted by
the City Comintis'sich.
To rezone this two-bloclic frontage on
Bitcavne Boulevard from R-C to C-1 and.
to apply the SPD-3 Overlay, District,,
consistent with the Biscayne Boulevard
North Economic Planning Study.
This zoning change eras recommended, in the:,
Biscayne North Economic Planning.,Study:1,
-approved in principleby the City Com-,,:.
mission on Novembcr 26, 1979., Other.,rb-',
commended zoning changes for properties
along Biscayne Boulevard between, NE 5 01th,
Terrace and NE 87th Street were approved
'
by � the City m. 'Comission ' in ordinance No
9134 on July 24,1980.
The policy statement,concerning North.
Biscavne Boulevard`in,the Miami Com-
-
-prehensive Neighborhood Plan states.:
R, bitdayhe t6Ulovatd1, Ptbtbt:b
the dbnVbtt3'_bft of ta.L q 4 h l Motel
into tbdotate-dehtlty re t i -
dential and fni.4-tecl
tial uses through zoning ihcontilvtt
and modlif"ications, 'street boaUtifJta_
tion and tehaljilitatloh a8gistant'o"
The failinq od,ohcmic health of B1.8
3
ca%,'ne Boulevard bet%lteen Nt 16th Street
and ME 87th Street may be e-.1.1plained b
prevalent in.offidi!ent and obsolete
land usesY primarily motels.
The change of zoning from A C to C-1
is proposed t o a 11 ow, higher densIity
office options in addition to higher
density residential options to serve
as a redevelopment impetus, while not
detracting from the duality of life
e
within the adjacent residential neiqh=
borhood,
RE C 0,'-1:11 E Z,i DAT I 0c1
P L %. 1 1 G
DEP7%RTME`1,T
ADVISORY
BOT,RD
CITY C0,111ISSION
PLA1li'!Ii,!G ADVISORY
BOARD,
The SPD-3 Biscayne Boulevard North Spe-
cial overlay District, approved by the
Pll'�B on 14ay 7, 1980 and by the City Comt_.11.
mission in Ordinance No. 913.3 on duly
24, 1980, will apply, to the proposed
C-1 district to restrict the Linder -
lying C 1 uses to,thos.e consistent
with the neighborhood and to offer 'de-
velopers an incentive for redevelon—ment
through transfer,of development rights.
APPROVAL
APPROVAL, on May 5, 19821 by a 7-0 vote.
Passed as Ordinance 'No. 9455 on June 241
1982.
Recommended apprbval, on September 1,19,82
by a 7-0 vote.,
J
II A 11
LU
LAw1
St
m
a+toi
wt
terzu
-""
om
iv
t<� NE. 62 , •ao .�
62 ST-
ST ,E ��� � 111 I I �,: I ! I��1 I I �.�• .�tl� t N ;.,, ,` if�l
H���i�� .,
«. ,•..
eT,.1� �I • �.I. ;i
Subject Property ^
(Lot 1 G) r�E `"1^
n- O
TER 1r s
ST
,. 59
N E.
Pr:Or=OSi'0 C-1 ZO.. .,G / APPLZCt�'I'TOtl OF S. -3
Fic;.:re 1. Prcres`d �i n,�' of Zoning P,,t�:ren. �;'.E. 62 Street
Et^.�dF i:. P.. 64 Street Along Bisca,n 'e F-bu1c VdrG� , -