HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-82-1140.T-82-134 to
82-1140
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SELECTION BY THE CITY
MANAGER OF THE MOST QUALIFIED FIRMS TO PROVIDE
PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES
FOR THE RENOVATION OF BUILDING A OF THE MANUFL"
ARTIME COMMUNITY CENTER; AUTHORIZING ThE CITY
MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT; DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO PRESENT
A NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT TO THE CITY COMMISSION
FOR APPROVAL UTILIZING FU14DS FROM THE 8TH YEAR
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM TO COVER THE COST
OF SAID AGREEMENT FOR THE PROJECT.
WHEREAS, the City of Miami Commission on May 27, 1982, by
Resolution 82-447, designated the Maniltal Artime Community Center as
a Category B project in accordance with Subsection (2) of Section
18-77.2 of the City Code with respect to the renovation of
Building A; and
WHERLAS, in the implementation of the said program, the City
Manager through a competitive selection committee solicited ex-
pressions of interest from qualified consultants and evaluated the
qualifications of those firms which responded to his inquiry; and
WHLRI:;AS, the most qualified firms for providing professional
architectural/engineering services for the renovation were selected
in accordance with Section 18-77.3 of the City Code; and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City of Miami to be-
gin the design development and construction documents for the
renovation of Building A of the I4r.uf>1 Artirtie Community Center; and
WHEREAS, funding for the cost of contracting for professional
architectural/engineering services to begin said project is available
from the 8th Year Community Development program;
IJ0W, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
Of' MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The City Commission hereby approves the selection
I-iy the City Manager of the following firms as the most qualified to
provide professional architectural/engineering services for the
renovation of building A of the I41-int.iol, Commui.. v Center in the
rank order listed:
UN COMMISSION
MEETING OF
0 E C 9 1982
ww,n„
XWWW ...................NN.I.�I
0
1. Duany, Plater-Zyberk and Plasencia
2. Zycovich Architects and Associates
3. Boerema, Bermello, Kurki and Vera, Inc.
Section 2. The City Commission hereby authorizes the City
Manager or his designee to negotiate a professional services agree-
ment on behalf of the City of Miami with the rank ordered firms
listed its Section 1 hereinatove, for the renovation of th-� project,
beginning with the first rank ordered firm, for such professional
architectural/engineering services as may be required. During the
negotiations procedure, in the event that the City Manager cannot
negotiate an agreement which, in his opinion, is fair, competitive
any: reasonable, with the first rank ordered firm, then he is hereby
authorized to terminate such negotiations and to proceed to negotiate
with Che second most qualified firm. In the event that he fails to
negotiate a satisfactory contract with the second firm, then he is
authorized to undertake negotiations with the third firm until a fair,
competitive and reasonable agreement is reached.
Section 3. The City Manager is directed to present to the City
Commission the negotiated contract at the earliest scheduled meeting
of the City Commission immediately following the negotiation of the
contract, for approval by the City Commission prior to execution.
Section 4. Funds from the 8th Year Community Development program
7A will be used to cover the cost of said contract for the Manuel Artime
Community Center.
-2-
82-1i�� _'
El
11
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 9TH day of DECEMBER 9
1982.
ATTEST:
_ �cJ
RA I-Pif G. ONGIE, CITY Cl-5KK
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
ROBERT F. CLARK
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS:
E R. GARCIA-PEDROSA
r,
- 3-
MAURICE A. FERRE
M A Y 0 R
82-114C
19
Howard V. Gary
City Manager
Dena Spillman, Director
Department of Community Development
November 22, 1982
Selection of an Architectural/
Engineering Firm for the Reno-
vation of Building A of the
Manuel Artime Community Center
City Commission Agenda:
December 9, 1982
It is recommended that the City Commission approve
the selection in rank order of the most qualified
firms to provide architectural/engineering services
for the renovation of Building A of the Manuel Artime
Community Center and authorize the City Alanager to
negotiate a contract for said services utilizing funds
from the 8th Year Community Development program�allo-
cated for said purposes, per the attached resolution.
Cn May 27, 1982, the City Commission, by Resolution 82-447, designated
the Manuel Artime Community Center as a Category B project with re-
spect to acquiring, architectural/engineering services for the renovation
of Building h of the Manuel Artime Community Center.
In accordance with Subsection (2) of Section 18-77.2 of the City Code,
a competitive selection committee was established by the City Manager
with representation from the Departrr.ents of Community Development,
Finance, Fire, Rescue and Inspections Services, and Public works. A
representative from the City 1•1anager's office, the community and a lo-
cal architect also served on the committee which was chaired by Cathy
Leff, T.ssistant Director, Department of Community Development.
Cn June 29 and July 13, 1982, the competitive selection committee met
to establish criteria for the selection process. An advertisement was
placed in local ne%..spapers on July 8, 1982 soliciting expressions of
interest and background information from firms interested in partic-
ipating in the project and approximately 700 letters were mailed to
architectural and engineering firms advising of same.
In accordance with the provisions established by Section 18-77.3 of the
City Code, the competitive selection committee reviewed and evaluated
the letters of interest and applications from the 46 firms that re-
sponded.
82-1140
Howard V. Gary
City Manager
40
-2- November 22, 1982
As a result of their evaluation, ten (10) firms were selected as the
most qualified and were invited to be interviewed by the committee
on November 16 and November 18, 1982. Those firms were: Milton
Carlisle Harry and Associates; Duany, Plater-Zyberk and Plasencia;
Sasaki Associates; Russell, Martinez, Holt Architects; Zycovich
Architects and Associates; Hatcher, Zeigler, Gunn and Associates;
Architects International Inc.; Boerema, Bermello, Kurki and Vera, Inc.;
Wilbur Smith and Associates and Ronald Frazier and Associates.
On November 18, 1982 the committee selected the three most qualified
firms in rank order as follows:
1) Duany, Plater-Zyberk and Plasencia
2) Zycovich Architects and Associates
3) Boerema, Bermello, Kurki and Vera, Inc.
In order to proceed with obtaining the services of a qualified firm
to provide design development and construction documents for the reno-
vation of Building A of the Manuel Artime Community Center, it is
requested that the City Commission approve the City Manager's selec-
tion in rank order and authorize the City Manager to negotiate a
contract for the aforesaid services utilizing funds available from the
8th Year Cornrnunity Development program allocated for said purposes.
A negotiated agreement in accordance with the provisions outlined by
Section 18-77.4 of the City Code (Competitive Negotiations) will then
be presented to the City Commission for final approval.
In accordance with Subsection (2) of Section 18-77.2 of the City Code,
attached is the supporting data of the competitive selection com-
mittee's activities.
MIAMI, rLORIDA
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
10 Howard V. Gary
City Manager
.'RO`.' Dena Spillman, Director
Department of Community Development
',ATL November 220 1982 rI.
Selection of an Architectural/
Engineering Firm for the Reno-
vation of Building A of the
Manuel Artime Community Center
City Commission Agenda:
December 9, 1982
It is recommended that the City Commission approve
the selection in rank order of the most qualified
firms to provide architectural/engineering services
for the renovation of Building A of the Manuel Artime
Community Center and authorize the Cite Manager to
negotiate a contract for said services utilizing funds
from the 8th Year Community Development program allo-
cated for said purposes, per the attached resolution.
On May 27, 1982, the City Commission, by Resolution 82-447, designated
the Manuel Artime Community Center as a Category B project with re-
spect to acquiring architectural/engineering services for the renovation
of Building A of the Manuel Artime Community Center.
In accordance with Subsection (2) of Section 18-77.2 of the City Code,
a competitive selection committee was established by the City Manager
with representation from the Departments of Community Development,
Finance, Fire, Rescue and Inspections Services, and Public Works. A
representative from the City Manager's office, the community and a lo-
cal architect also served on the committee which was chaired by Cathy
Leff, Assistant Director, Department of Community Development.
on June 29 and July 13, 1982, the competitive selection committee met
to establish criteria for the selection process. An advertisement was
placed in local newspapers on July 8, 1982 soliciting expressions of
interest and background information from firms interested in partic-
ipating in the project and approximately 700 letters were mailed to
architectural and engineering firms advising of same.
In accordance with the provisions established by Section 18-77.3 of the
City Code, the competitive selection committee reviewed an _evaluated
the letters of interest and applications from the 46 firms that re-
sponded. -,�
c-1
i
�
W
8lid_U40
n
Howard V. Gary
City Manager
wo
-2- November 22, 1982
As a result of their evaluation, ten (10) firms were selected as the
most qualified and were invited to be interviewed by the committee
on November 16 and November 18, 1982. Those firms were: Milton
Carlisle Harry and Associates; Duany, Plater-Zyberk and Plasencia;
Sasaki Associates; Russell, Martinez, Holt Architects; Zycovich
Architects and Associates; Hatcher, Zeigler, Gunn and Associates;
Architects International Inc.; Boerema, Bermello, Kurki and Vera,Inc.;
Wilbur Smith and Associates and Ronald Frazier and Associates.
On November 18, 1982 the committee selected the three most qualified
firms in rank order as follows:
1) Duany, Plater-Zyberk and Plasencia
2) Zycovich Architects and Associates
3) Boerema, Bermello, Kurki and Vera, Inc.
In order to proceed with obtaining the services of a qualified firm
to provide design development and construction documents for the reno-
vation of Building A of the Manuel Artime Community Center, it is
requested that the City Commission approve the City Manager's selec-
tion in rank order and authorize the City Manager to negotiate a
contract for the aforesaid services utilizing funds available from the
8th Year Community Development program allocated for said purposes.
A negotiated agreement in accordance with the provisions outlined by
Section 18-77.4 of the City Code (Competitive Negotiations) will then
be presented to the City Commission for final approval.
In accordance with Subsection (2) of Section 18-77.2 of the City Code,
attached is the supporting data of the competitive selection com-
mittee's activities.
82--114(;
I ct7l" I'!- KIWI) VL 0 010 A
I'JT�F�-O=FiC"= f�lrt;tOFZANUUi.^
-c Howard V. Gary
City Manager
Dena Spillman, Director
Department of Community Development
L. r. rr May 17, 1982 FILE
Renovation of Little Havana
Community Center
June 10, 1982
Commission Agenda
It is recommended that the Citv Commission
authorize the City Manager to acauire the
services of an architectural/engineering
firm to provide professional services to
include contract documents, drawings, spec-
ifications and construction administration
for the renovation of Buildina A of the
Little Havana Communitv'Center according to
the design concept outlined in the attached
TIaster Plan. There are funds available in
the 8th Year Community Development program
for Little Havana Community Center improve-
ments. It is further recommended that this
project be designated a Category B project
in accordance with Subsection (a) of Section
18-77.2 of the City of Miami Code and that
Cathy Leff, Assistant Director, Department
of Community Development, be appointed as
Chairnerson of the Competitive Selection
Committee, in accordance with Subsection (c)
of Section 18-77.2 of the City Code, per the
attached resolution.
In May 1981, the City Commission authorized the City Manager to retain
the services of Sasaki and Associates to prepare a master plan and
design concept for the renovation of Building A of the Little Havana
Community Center and the adjacent vacant site previously occupied
by Building B. The master plan was to address code deficiencies as
well as alternatives for the use of the large auditorium area and
existing office space.
On October 7, 1981, Sasaki and Associates made a presentation before
the City Commission on the proposed renovation scheme for Building A
and the design for an urban mini -plaza on the former Building B site.
At that meeting, the City Commission authorized the City Manager to
proceed with the development of the mini -plaza utilizing existing
Community Development funds designated for that purpose. This process
is currently underway.
82-1 C'
Howard V. Gary
5/17/82
pg. 2
With regards to the renovation of Building A, the master plan
recommends that the 1263 seat auditorium area be reduced to a 500
seat fully equipped theatre which will also create an additional
4045 sq.ft. of office space for social services and/or community
programs. The plan suggests how the renovation, which is estimated
at $1.5 million excluding architect fees, can be accomplished in
phases as Community Development funds and/or other funds are iden-
tified for same. This plan has been reviewed and endorsed by the
Little Havana Community Development Forum.
There is presently $100,000 available in 8th Year Community Develop-
ment funds earmarked for Little Havana Community Center improvements.
It is recommended that the City Commission authorize the City Manager
to utilize these funds to retain the services of an architectural/
engineering firm to provide contract documents, drawings, and
specifications in accordance with the design concept recommended by
the master plan. These documents must be prepared prior to beginning
any construction work. Construction administration would be contin-
gent upon identification of funds to actually implement each phase
of the renovation, however, it is recommended that the selected firm
oversee the project to its completion.
_ If this meets the approval of the City Commission, it is recommended
that the project be designated Category B in accordance with Sub-
section (a) of Section 18-77.2 of the City Code and that the following
individuals be appointed to serve on the Competitive Selection
Committee in accordance with Subsections (bii) and (c) of Section
18-77.2 of the City Code:
Chairperson: Cathy Leff, Assistant Director, Department
of Community Development, representing
administrative and user department.
Committee members: Walter Pierce, Assistant to the
City Manager
Pete Long, Assistant Director, Construction
Division, Department. of Public Works
Santiago Ventura, Building & Zoning
Inspection Department
Carlos Garcia, Director, Department of
Finance
Gail Baldwin, Architect
Conchita Blanc, Community representative
/mal
82--1140
RESOLUTION NO. 82+-447.
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE LITTLE HAVANA
COMMUNITY CENTER AS A CATEGORY B PROJECT
WITH RESPECT TO C014TRACT DOCUMENTS, DRAWINGS,
SPECIFICATIONS AND CONSTRUCTIO14 ADMINISTRATION
FOR THE RENOVATION OF BUILDING A, 900 S.W.
1ST STREET, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUBSECTION (a)
OF SECTION 18-77.2 OF THE CITY CODE, WHICH
ESTABLISHES PROCEDURES IN C014TRA- ING FOR SAID
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND ALSO ESTABLISHES
COMPETITIVE NEGOTIATIOJ REQUIREMENTS WITH
REGARD TO FURNISHI:;G OF SUCH SERVICES; FURTHER
APPOINTING CATHY LEFF, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF
THE DEPART11•1ENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, AS
CHAIRPERSON OF THE C011PETITIVE SELECTION COM-
MITTEE,IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUBSECTION (c) OF
SECTION 13-77.2 OF THE CITY CODE.
WHEREAS, the City of Mia:ai has a master plan for the
renovation of Building A of the Little Havana Community
Center; and
WHEREAS, in order to implement the master plan,
professional architectural/engineering services are re-
quired for contract documents, drawings, specifications
and construction administration; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager recommends that the Little
Havana Community Center be designated a Category B project,
in accordance with the provisions of Subsection (a) of
Section 18-77.2 of the City Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager recommends that Cathy Leff,
Assistant Director to the Department of Community Develop -
went, be appointed Chairperson of the Competitive Selection
Committee, in accordance with the provisions of Subsection
(c) of Section 18-77.2 of the City Code; and
WHEREAS, funds for said services are available in the
8th Year Community Development program earmarked for Little
Havana Community Center improvements;
82-1140-
CITY COMMISSION
MEETING OF
MAY2 7 1982-,
0
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE Cot-24ISSION OF
THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The Little Havana Community Center is s
hereby designated as a Category B project with respect to
acquiring professional services for the preparation of
contract documents, drawings, specifications and construction
administration for the renovation of Building A in accordance
with Subsection (a) of Section 18-77.2 of the City Code,
which establishes procedures in contracting for certain pro-
fessional services and establishes competitive negotiation
requirements with regard to the furnishing of such services.
Section 2. Cathy Leff. Assistant Director of the
Department of Community Development, is hereby appointed as
Chairperson of the Competitive Selection Committee, in
accordance with the provisions of Subsection (c) of Section
18-77.2 of the City Code.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of — , 1982.
NIAURI CE A. FERRE
M A Y 0 R
TTr T:
LPH G. ONGIE, CITY CLEWC-
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
e__a-n RT F. CLARK
DEPUTY CITY ATTOR14EY
AP VED AS TO MRIA AND CORRECT14ESS :
GEORG�--F-.X, "JR.
CITY TTORNEY
-2-
82-114C.
— The -
LITTI,Z FAVANA CCM2-'-U:,'ITY CENTER %%I.OVATION
GCIDEL:Z;;ES
FOR
SELECTION OF CCI.SULTI,dG J —IBIS
82-11•'�or:
LI':TI.E ITTXANA COtit;t' "_TY CE-TER
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Selection Committee 1
II. Criteria Guidelines - Initial Selection 1
A. General 1
B. Selection Prccedures - Initial Selection 1
III. Criteria Guide.L-nes - Final Selection 3
A. General 3
B. Selection Procedures - Final Seiec:.icn 3
i
IV. Cons,ur.ications 5
V. Sc --dole 5
Fcrr.:s A, B, and Check Sheet
V11 . ..p, end ice
Ap_ erc�:: A - Proposed Ac•,7er.tisement
An,zand:.. B - Letter to Firms Selected for
Presentation and Interview
Instructic::s to Consulting Firms
Typical ContrZct
FL.penf._.. C Letter to 11cst Firms
Letter to 0t::e- Firms
Lette:- Authorizing Nea_ tiatiens
Notice to Proceed
Appendix D Master Plan for the Renovation of
the Little Havana Community Center
82-1140
SELZ_C:
A Selection Com.:,ittee has .:een apoc`nted to review the qual-
ifications of interested consulting firms to provide construction
documents, specifications an6 construction services for the reno-
vation of Building A of the Little Havana Connunity Center in
accordance with the design concept outlined in the Little Havana i
Cormmunit,.• Center Piaster Plan adopted by the City Commission on
May 27, 1982. The Ccmmittee will meet as a bod7 and review all !
information submitted from interested consulting firms, with the
objective of evaluating the appiiczants and ma:iinq an initial se- i
lecc_on of at '_east _::ree aualif i ed fir—, :3 . -...ese firms f 4.'e �••riil ... :,
be invited 'Co .:+eet with the Committee for an inter,iew and pre-
sentation. The Cor^ittee will thin rank order the firms and make
its recc,-jiendation to the City P.anager. The City 2danager will
present the list to the Cite Cc.;,.-nissio.- for its approval and to
authcri.:e him to negctiate an afire men t.
11. r-_-FRT—A - T_::TTT: L SLR.=.CT.T.ON
A. General
T;,e City is interested in engaging a firm ;r::, ch is ex: = enced
in adantive re -use, i::ter icr renc ation s..., in aevel o_c- na
tical --esicn concepts "Co mect the City's requirzzments for
renov -ing the Little Havana Communi Center. The selected firm
will to reaucsted to prepare design development documents, cost
estlmates, and constriction doc,.:ments,* utilicinv_ the design gorged
lined in t.ze n.dcotec Little Havana Ccr^unit,. Center ".aster :.n.
The selected firm c•;iil be recuiled tc provide censtruction�serv-
ices d',ring the construction phase, howe•:er, funds have not been
identified for construction and this work may nct begin immedi:.tely
upc:: ccmnletion and aprr:Dval of the construction documents c1iase.
B . Sell+ —z_or Prooe uses - In- __al Se _ect_cn
In '_he initial selection procedure, each Cor% ittce me.^;bAr
will c:::�;,i..e anc evaluate each applicant's response to the adver-
ti>ement. It is expected that each applicant will submit a cover
'_e_ter, a fc.= 254, anc_ po••cibly a ccmpa.ny brochure, all of which
will provide information as to the individual firms capacility
to r.:eet criteria established by the Committee as a whole for this
particular project. The criteria and guidelines for evaluating
and rating the applicant's information are as follows:
-1-
ma
4 iY., t'i •;.T�CL_':. .
82-11 4 0
10,
Item I: Previous professional experience, maximum value = 45
In general, the number of years in practice reflects upon
the individual's stability and credibility. In this instance,
the City is interested in having a principal who has been in
practice for at least five years and has been involved in
renovation projects during the past three years or more, when
this type of architectural -engineering work became more prev-
alent in South Florida and has had appropriate work experience
to demonstrate ability to handle diverse architectural/engineering
problems.
a. Five years or more in practice, maximum value = 15
b. Experience in interior renovation and adaptive reuse:
One or more projects each year for the past three
years, maximum value = 15. Consideration should be
made for individuals that indicate experience in adapt-
ive reuse projects, particularly in community types of
adaptive reuse projects involving extensive interior
renovation. Consideration should, further, be made for
firms that indicate experience in theatre and/or audi-
torium design and/or renovation.
C. Appropriate work experience to demonstrate ability to
handle diverse architecturaVengineering problems,
maximum value = 15
Item 2: Organization and Staff, maximum value = 40
In general, the City is interested in•a firm which is ade-
quately organized and staffed to serve the City's requirement
in a timely and efficient manner. The way a firm is structured
is indicative of the way it is responsive to its clients' needs.
There are a number of ways in which the leading firm can provide
all the different services desired by a client. The most common
are as follows:
1. All services are in-house. This means that the firm
has to be relatively large in order to have all
disciplines represented.
2. Some services are in-house, the others are subcontracted.
This method is probably the most common arrangement.
The leading firm can then specialize in certain areas
and can control a range of other services through sub-
contracts.
3. Some services are in-house, the others are provided for
by joint venturing. This method is also a fairly common
arrangement which offers a client an array of services
by a group of specialists.
Whichever arrangement is used, the key issues are as
follows:
`2 82-1140
a. Orcanicaticnal structure, maximum value = 20.
Is the applicant's oraa%ization geared to be responsi•.re
to the City's requirements? Is the person in charge
of the project in a key position in the firm so that
his/her decision will carry weight?
b. Professional team, ma.xinrun value = 20.
What is the e::perience of the team, acting together?
Is the arrangement such that the leading firm will
have control in coordinating the project?
I tem _' : LccatiCn, ma:-.imum value = 15
The Committee has decided that a firm located in the City of
Miami should be considered more favora.bl,, , all other things being
equal, than a firm '_ecated outside of t: e City. Therefore, the
Cecar. N_;i; _nl location of the firm dv'tcrm„ines a value on a sli dii.:
talc-,
a. Inside the Cit': of Iiiw^i: rating value = 15
b. Inside Metro Dade Count-:: rating value = 10
C. Dlse .•here in Ficri.da: rating value = 5.
d. C.. side of 1lorida: rating value - 3
It ='1 �" ^ ?. r Ve act :on r-l-n a_nd can. al, '! - t`_" to fi 'fit
Cry, 's --e _u_.rc-cnts _cr entering _r zo cn acree...ent.
Pric to--^_nterinc into an der,. sment the City, t::e
s_lec�c: f__.., :tiill be rec:_�ed to ccmply with certain previsions
ccn _ai: d in the st; nd-ard contract form. These items i cI ,e a^
af��r:;.a�ive ac-.. on p= ~ram, -ion-dycri.:,ination, insurance,
: p of dccumentsan.::. similar provisicns.At this ti: ;e,
or not the firm indica zes that it has an affirmative
action plan and can meet the Cit•_.•'s requircments for entc7:ing into
a cc..zr_�ct, the co-- ..tt--e-cmbcr s•r.ou_d za::e a si:--ple YESi..O
Cas..-eJvm�lent.
F1''.'AL SELECT'ON
A. G_neral
In thiJ art of the procedure, the t aual-fizz
izvi_cd to mare a presencc_ion to the Cor.•,.mlttee ..nd to
�ns'rrer any gu:stions the Corn.mittee members may wish to pose, all
in crder to evaluate the firms in a rank ordering. Each applicant
will have linen sent a cac}:age of inctructions re5::rding the
presentation and interview. See Appendix B.
B. Selection Procedure3 - Final Selection
Each Ccrniittee member will evaluate each applicant's preaen-
tat=on and response to qu.cstions. It. is the purpose of the
presentation and _nzery iew to hay.: each Cor.•-littee member learn
wh:-t the applicant intcnds to do from a business point of view
and to determine wheth`r cr not the applicant's review o:
his experience, c�Leativity and methods of d4='_ing with other
clients and their problems is suitable to the City's needs.
It is not the purpose of this step in the selection procedure
to have the applicant resolve any of the City's design problems
or in any wav have the applicant perform any consulting service
in connection with the project.
Item 1: Method of approach, maximum value = 60
,Under this item, the applicant will be required to describe
the methods his firm will employ to carry out his assignment.
Without trying to solve any specific problem and without pro-
viding any consulting service to the City, the applicant should
draw upon his background to convince the Committee of his com-
petency and qualifications to undertake the work to be contracted
for. More specifically, the applicant should advise the Commit-
tee about his method touching on these matters:
a. Organization, maximum value = 10
b. Professional staff, maximum value = 10
c. Support capabilities, maximum value = 10
d. Activities and schedules, maximum value = 10
e. Procedures and methods, maximum value = 10
f. Creativity in dealing with design problems illustrated
by past work experience, maximum value = 10
Item 2: Experience in cost estimating, maximum value = 25
of great importance to the City will be the consultant's
cost estimate for construction. Each applicant will be in-
structed to give a detailed description of his firm's
capabilities and experience in cost estimating.
Item 3: Investication, maximum value = 15
The Committee ma,,, decide to investigate the applicants after
all presentations have been made to ascertain performance and
client relationships from references regarding client satisfaction
with schedules and cost estimating given by the applicants or
to verify other information, depending upon the circumstances.
Prior to completing the rank, ordering process, the Committee will
decide on this matter.
Item 4: Discussion of fees, no value
The applicant will discuss fees in a general way to give the
Committee his views on the proposed contract provisions regarding
fees, payments and methods of contracting for his services.
Item 5: Capability to meet City's requirements, no value
The applicant will discuss the proposed agreement and express
his views about certain City requirements and whether or not his
firm can meet them.
Item 6: Affirmative action plan, no value
-- -- The applicant will discuss his affirmative action plan.
82-ILI Xr:
-4-
IV.. CO! L;C;1IC:'.TiO"
Attached are ce:nmunic.aticns docu.:.2nts that relate to this procedure:
Appendix; A - Proposed Ad% ertisement
Appendix: B - Invitation to Selected Applicants
Letter
Instructions
Sample Contract
Appendix C - Letter to Cost oaulified Firms
Letter to All Ot�_r Firms
Lctter Authorising ;egotiations
Notice to Proceed
Appen;.ix D - Master Plan for the Re -ovation of t..e
Littic Havana Center
V. .:LE
Cate
June, 1982
July, 1932
July, _98Z
ug., i9c2
Auz. , 19S2
AU:T. , 15 �- �
Sept., 1982
Cct., 198?
Cct., 1982
vet , 1°32
1S32
::c•.. /'sec 19 S 2
El`c. , 1982
Tar.. , 1: 33
V
an
1�3
r.. , 19 :, 3
Cor,r.•,ittee meets to set criteria
Cc:-,D- ate sc_ ection criteria
Advertise : c:- e::tress _.. of interest
Recaive e::p_cssi2ns of interest -from applicants
Co�,u '_flee r eetc and se_ects an,_-licants =cr
press: to::�cn and _._cer�•_� �:
issue iCt--c of I vit-- tion tc a zlic ants
Prcpa_ e agenda docur.,,an is Commiss_c:i
Meeting, approvina list of con;ultants
and a�tnlz ich._ Ci `?anacer to reacc_ate
:ilea^to m.:..:e to Cor—z%.ttae
Cor:-nitt`e completes selection prccess
Cha_4 ;::-.an suLnits rcpert to City 'M;_.nacer
City• Cc. -mission meets an' approves aaen':- -tE'
Ccm plcze n 2gctiaticns
Prcp.ar^ acer.::a item dccuments for Commission
Ve•ating, approving agroemcnt and aut:icrizir.g
t•, =aer to execu.:2 it.
mc.ets and approves agenda it`rl
to al! 0:4'- C_
E::D OF
82-1140
IIII'TIAL ShLRC'1'IOIl CItI1'I:F:I1:
AI'I'LICA1, • ' S i111:1C!:R
I'TL:1 R I T C E F: �
�
1 Previous professional experienct' 45
i
a. ]ears in practice (i�rincPal(s)) 15
experience / 15
Interior renovation
c. Appropriate work experience 15
Organization and staff 40
,3• organizational structure
20
*b. Professional team 20
3 Location : (Rate once 01-11 )
City of Miami
k,. Dade County
C. Florida
d. outside Florida
some...o�a.
TO'T hL
4 Affirmative action i,lan
15
10
5
3
100
Yes/I10
I
t
Fate sheet of
;ommittee 1-lenber — --'—
`Use checl: sheet as a g•uicle.
FORM A
r
.fir—L
ail
1 6
I'IIInL :SI:I+I:CTION CRITERIA
CRITClzIA
.fir aV.O�.�►" - +R1ttAtTiL2al+ � — method of of approach:
a. OrganiZ,,tion
1). Prafessiclial si of f
c. support capabi1itiC
(I Activities an-1 schodules
C Procedui es awl m,?thol1s
Cruitivit-v in dealinq with design
roblc nis -
I::<perience in cost esti.t•iating
I r:.- c t i g a t i o n and cli tent satisfaction with
schodules and cwst estbuatijig
/�l.J.'1..�Y�o.MWRWYYrrW1�W.-�YYR.4�,Y.✓.K1u•�. .ry. L�
TOTAT,
� S O!\f Yt�.i�!"�•�.•••—�•�iA�.Jy..�W.l�.,. -.. tYi�tOYLYOLY.:L1
Discussion of fees
Capability to meet city's requirements
Affirmative action plan rr
ItA1'I11G
60
10
10
lu
1 ()
10
10
25
15
100
Y 2s/110
yc�/t7o {y
API•LICANT
I
ommittee ncmber 1)jtof
ORM 13
Use as an aid in evaluating Organization and Staff.
A. Capability of Tea n1 Yes tlo
1 T ] c
i.
Luau L.Mit Lopieseilts various Clesign disciplines:
. architer. ture/enginecri11U
-
. architecture w/-11gincorind compollcnt.
. engineeri'hg w/architect.ural compoi]c:Ilt
. other
.
2.
Member firms include following principals:
. registered architect
iegister-ccl- f,nl jineeir
. registered landscape architect
other
3.
Member firms represent complete array of design disciplines:
. architecture
. traffic engineering
. curl- -Ilgi.neel: i 11J
. structural enginceri--1 _
r;ec}1an�ca1 en'lincerin•.j
electrical C il`J111Li ].I1'1
. landscape architecture
other
4.
Integrated team offers services e.,hich are mutually complimentary.
D. k1enuacy of Staff
1.
Team has sufficient and corpctent: hernclnllel to 1111dertake assiril:rlen'-
2.
Rtccnt, currrint z1t1r3 pr��j��1.c�] t:c�r}: ]o;Icl ; of tr�r1111 allow sufficient personnel
capacity to Und(.-1-take. i111d accowpl ir.11
3.
1:ein er firms de--tonstrate alli I i t}, to within hin 1'+udget
4.
1.cmbcr firms demun:,trate aljility to tucc:t--
API"ENDI:i B
INSTRUCTIONS TO PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING FIRMS
REGARDING PRESENTATION AND INTERVIEW
GENERAL
The proce(Dures describe(3 herein conform to the provisions under
Section 18-76 through 18-77.6 of the City Code for the acquisition of
professional services. Specifically, the City of Miami is seeking the
most qualified professional consulting firms to provide architectural
and engineering services in the near future in connection with the reno-
vation of Building A of the Little Havana Community Center, 900 S.W.
lst Street. The City has advertised for expressions of interest from
consultants who were qualified in providing such services. A Selection
Committee examined the information provided by all respondents to the
advertisement and determined that your firm was among the most qualified
to provide the above services. Accordingly, the Selection Committee
invites you to make a presentation to it in accordance with these in-
structions so that the Selection Committee may complete its evaluation of
the most qualified firms.
Upon completion of its evaluation, the Selection Committee will
prepare a report, including its findings and recommendations, and submit
it to the City Manager. He will then submit a resolution to the City
Commission to approve the list of proposed most qualified firms and to
also authorize negotiations with those firms in order of their ranking.
TI :E FOR PRESENTATIONI AND INTERVIEW
The time and place of your presentation and interview are noted
in the cover letter. The total time allotted to your firm will be
limited to 45 minutes, allowing for about 25 minutes for your presen-
tation and 20 minutes for the interview.
SLIDES
If you desire to show slides please bring your own projector and
a 20 foot extension cord. The City will provide a screen.
WRITTEN MATERIAL
No written material should be presented to the Selection Committee
in the presentation and interview.
PUBLIC NOTICE
In accordance with City Code Section 18-77.2, your presentation
will be open to the general public but we are requesting that you do not
attend interviews of the other firms invited to appear before the Committee.
-1-
82-1140
.®
COST S
It is understood and agreed that by accepting the City's invi-
tation to make a presentation and to participate in an interview
with the Selection Committee, your firm will bear all costs associ-
ated with the presentation and interview and that the City will have
no obligation to recompense your firm in any way for such costs.
CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION
The criteria for evaluating your firm's qualifications are
briefly described below. It is highly desirable that the individuals
who will be actually assigned to the project and who will be responsi-
ble For fulfilling the contractual services be among those making the
presentation or be available for questioning during the interview
period.
RE`:OVaTION OF LITTLE HAVAI'4A COMIMU'NITY CENTER
Scone of Services. It is intended that the consultant will
provide all necessar% professional and technical services relating
to the renovation of Building A of the Little Havana Community Center,
900 S."I. 1st Street, in accordance with the schematic design outlined
in the Master Plan for the renovation of the Little Havana-Ccm-munity
renter. This includes design development documents, construction
costs, and construction documents.
While the City has not identified funds for the construction
prase, which may be accomplished in phases as outlined in the :Ias-er -
Plan, it is understood that the selected firm will provide professional
services during the construction phase which may not begin upon
ccmpletion and approval of the construction documents.
Attached is a copy of the Master Plan which outlines the
schematic design for the renovation.
Method of Approach. Based on the above, your presentation
should be a tactual dissertation on your firm's organizational struc-
ture; the identification and qualifications of professional staff
that will be assigned to this City project; support capabilities; an out-
line of activities that will be undertaken by the professional and
- support staffs; time schedules for accomplishing the activities; and
a sumnary of procedures and methods developed and used by the firm
to deliver the finished work products.
It is not intended that your firm solve any specific problem
or provide consulting services, but rather that you acquaint the
Selection Committee with information about how your firm would work
on a City project and the team's background and qualifications to
undertake the required work.
82'-1140
-2-
I
Previous Experience. Having given the Selection Committee an
overview of your firm's method of approach, you should then describe
recent projects which your firm (or team) handled that involved
adaptive re -use. Of special interest to the Committee will be learn-
ing about your capability of preparing reliable and accurate cost
estimates.
Meetina the Citv's Reauirements. You are requested to comment
upon the typical agreement between City and Consultant and to advise
the Selection Committee of any proposed changes, omissions or addi-
tions that you deem necessary in order to enter into a contract.
Affirmative Action Plan. You are requested to describe your
firm's affirmative action plan. -
Fees. The purpose of the presentation and interview does not
include negotiating fees. However, the City's policy is to arrive
at lump siLm contracts when the scope of services can be defined
within reasonable limits or, as an alternative, to arrive at a re-
taining fee type of contract with an upset amount when the scope of
services cannot be defined. You are requested to comment on these
concepts.
END OF INSTRUCTIONS
82-1140
-3-
EXHI^IT „A„
T,F C1TV nF I
I� •IT(.
I. SCC°E OF VICRK FOR
Irlc�uD t.tG
2. PROJECT BUDGET
3. PROJECT LOt;GE."ITY SCHEDULE DATED
. _•...r ..�.• --•way ... r— ... _.. ..
.
A C a F F N T
THIS AGREE:._-.; a,ade this A.D.
by and between THE CITY OF Mlr.:!I, a Municipal Corporation of the
State if Florida, hereinafter tali=d the CITY, and
hereinafter called the
W I T N roc c u
WHE 7'—ElS, the CITY proposes to renovate
of the City owned property
located
Miami, Florida, hereinafter called the PRO.:cC", and
the CITY has ap, rcr.imjtely
to finance the
de•:elcp-er,t, design, renovation and construction eypenses of the
PR.OJ--. and
WHZ=.,_A3, the C?TY desires to encage an architectural/
engineering firm to render the necessary professi:,nal and technical
services, hereinafter called WORK, for the plannin„ design and
constr::ctzcn consultation of the PROJECT; upon the terms, conjitions
and provi5ions hereinafter set forth; and
WH;:.'KAS, the Corrnission of the City of Miami has by Resolution
t.o. Idated approved the
selecticn of the CITY t- ,.NAGF.R of
as the most qualified firm to provide
professional architectural/en,jincering services for the PROJECT and
has also autanrized the CITY MANAG%R to ncyotiate an Agreement with
said firm for the professional and technical services required for
the PROJECT;
NO'., T111:1tLFORC, the CITY and the PRINCIPAL for 'he considerations
hcicinafter set forth, agree and convenant, one un") the other as
follows:
a
SECT 'ON I - GENPPAI.
A. The PRINCIPAL and the CITY are fully aware of the PROJECT.
schedule require---nt, and :.,ill therefore proceed with all dili;ence
to carry out the WOPY to r^eet such requirements. The PRINCIPAL
shall proceed with all applicable dispatch in a sound, economical
efficient and professional manner, incl.:aing preparation of phasing
and incremental bidding docu.:.ents for construction as necessary, and
shall co -ply with the provisions of all applicable Federal, State
and Local laws;
B. The PRINCIPAL shall perform the professional services as
hereinafter set forth and in general acccrdance with the instr•,:cticns
of the CITY;
C. The CITY has budgeted the amour._ of for the
total cost of the P?C.:EC=, as ftllcws:
1. for desi: n services, includina:
i
a. LUVT SU..' FEE for the selected arch I'te=tura:.'enc_neer_.
f i .....
b. Surveys, soils investicaticns and related expenses.
C. Inspection, testing and related expenses.
d. Ad:^inistraticn, reproduction and related esp•2nses.
2, for construction and PROJECT contincencies, as
follows.
for PROJECT continooncics, including 1.5
percent of the construction cost for art work.
D. The PRI;:CIVAL shall design the PROJECT within the funds
available to the CITY for this purpose; and
E. The CITY agrees to Pay and the PRINCIPAL agrees to accept
as payment in full for all professional and technical services
rendered, as outlined in SECTION III - PROPE M MNAL SERVICES thereof.
the LUMP Sum FEE of �
•2
82-1140
1
I. LUMP SUM FEE - is hereby defined as the arount of •.^oney the
CITY agrees to pay and the PRINCIPAL acres to accept as payment
in full for all the professional and technical services rendered
pursuant to this agreement, to complete the WORK as further
defined in SECTION III - PRCFESSIC::J.L SERNICE3, hereof.
J. PP.O,:ECT :10ANAGER - is hereb•., defined as the :•tanager of the
PROJECT :or the CITY.
K. DI?.ECT TECHNICAL SALARY EYPE::St-' - is hereby defined as
the strai?ht-time portion of wages and salaries subject to :ed�raI
Income Tax of the PRINCIPALS'S technical perscnr.el 'Principals,
Architects, Engineers, Planners, Designers, Drat=nen,
Specifications Writers and Technicians) enc3ced directly on the
PnC.:ECT. The DIRECT TEC .'ICAL SALARY EXPENSE char -zed against the
PRC,:ZC: for any personnel, including ?*2I::C:7ALS shall not exceed
..••,.._.,•.....•.✓=t-'+--.e::w'•rti`''t^•' ,• - CQLLARS ($ A PER HOU:. plus ?a; rcll b=4en .which is not
to exceQa per. 2nt
-. L. EXH.' 'Z "A' - is hereby defined as the CIT'i'S pro:
reg rar.`s for th•-? desi.:n and =ona.tr,:cticn of the
inclu.:^_s the Scope of Work, the Project Budcet and the Project
Schedule, all attached hereto and a part of this
. Aor_erent.
Srr^ III - PP.0r7f7:7'C' -',L Sr•RVTC•-S
The PR1::C:2AL in close coordination with the CIT'i shall rerfor^
the following professional and technical services comprising the
WORK and shall be fully responsil)le for all the professional and
-..ca..✓.:.,.:.:,.�.�.-7:_:.�:.,�. ;� technical aspects thereof. The CITY'S review and approval of the
WORK will relate only to'overall compliance with the general
reyuircmontn of the PROJECT and when#2ver the term "Approval by the
~ -••- -•-- -- - City" or like term is used in thin A.Ircomrnt, the phraseology shall
in no way relieve the PRINCIPAL from any duties or responsibilities
under the terms of this 1lyreement and from using the best architectc:31
and encjincering services and practices.
The PRINCIPAL shill, in the preparation of Plans and
specifications, and in Site Inspection, comply with all Federal,
State and Local codes, ordinances and regulations pertaining to the
design and construction of the •PPOJLCT. Attention is invited to the
•..r ��..-r+......�.�- -:.� Federal wage -flour Law, Walsh -Mealy Act, The Occupational Safoty and
• e-! 82-1140
" - .•.- - - The CITY will cooperate fully with the PRI;1r_I?AL in establishing
the parameters of the Scope of Work which may be constructed within
the Project Budget.
The Schematic Design Phase shall be completed when the CITY
approves and accepts the Schematic Desi^n Cocument„
B. D E S = ,'- D:;?'1°::T ^NASE
During the Design Development Phase, upon written authorizatic:
of the CITY .and as directed ty the C:T_ for the approved and acc2pte�
parts of the Schematic Cesign Phase, the PP.I::CID•AL shall:
I. Prepare Design DevelL;:;•ent Zocu-ents consisting of plans,
elevations and other drawincs, and outline specifications,
all in order to fix and illustrate the size and character
- -� - - of the entire PACJECT in its essentials as to locatic.n.,
- -. - - kinds of matzrial, tyre of structure, mechamcal and
electrical Systems, utilities lecaticns, and such ct
works as may be req--ired.
2. Submit to the C:TY an Estimate of Project Construe--cn Cast
-' br^,ken down into ^ajar catecories. Tt. shall be the
oblication of the P=I::C_.A'- to pro:?uce a desica which -ay
be constructed within the Proi-ct Budget or any
subsequent revision thereof approved by the CITY. Apprc•:al
_ by the CITY of Schematic Design Studies and/or Desi.;n
_ D�zvelchment Documents includes approval of the censt.u,ct en
cost estimates submittcd therewith only if so stated in
.,. _ ..• - writing by the CITY. If either the Statement of Probable
Construction Co:;t for the Schematic Design Phase or the
Estimate of Construction Coz;t for the Design Develci,r*.nt
- --•- - -- --• -• - Phal.c is greater that the CITY", budgeted amount set forth
• "• in SECTION I C. herein, the CITY may require the PRINCIPAL
- . • ••••• - •. to revise the Schematic Dc:.i�in Studies and/or the Design
Development Docwnlnts as necessary in order to bring the
P1411XII'AL'S revised L•stim.ite of Project Construction Cost
within the CITY'S Project Budget. The work undertaken by
the PRIt:CIPAL in revising the do,:uments for the purposes
of r•ecting the CITY'S Project Oudgct shall be considered
\. (o
4.
. �.,�.�,. �i k'J.�� Mir •t:.Y."!.•oT.I 1Y�./�C �.I�
mow.` r `N.,..��„„�1rF..M�w.✓fy+
2. Revise the construction contract plans and specifications,
and any other written report or written docu.:ent, as
required, to conform with codes, regulations, rules, etc.,
governing the PROJECT.
3. Advise tJhe CITY of any adjust-.ents to previous estimates
of PROJECT constructicn cost which -ay be indicated by
chances in scope, design, requir-nents, mar%et con-itisns,
or otherwise.
4. Furnish the CITY with Final Estimate of Project Censt_____cn
Cost, based upon the cor.pleted working drawings and
specifications, broken ..corn into major catecories. The
PRINCIPAL'S Estimates of Project Censtrlcticn Cost shall be
constru,2d as an informed ,rcfessicnal cp n-;Tn and the CI..
will rely on it as a reasonable approximat_cn of bids to
be received.
5. See that all cor.str..ctzcn contract plans and specifiZatIcns
(working drx.rings and s=cif,_a._cns) bear the seal cf
either a Florida registered professional architect or
engineer and that the names o: cfessicnals res_cnsible
fcr ,najor portions of each separate specialty of the ::CRR
appear on the ccnstruction contract plans and specifications.
6. It is to be fully understood that the air ccndit:oning
sy5tcm for the PROJECT shall provide draft -free air
distribution and uniform temperatures and shill be
designed to minimize operation and maintenance costs.
Therefor, the PRINCIPAL shall provide the services of a
professional with the experience and capability of
designing suctl a sy :tom.
i. Because of the CITY'S concern for energy conservation, it
shall be fully undo rstood that the PRINCIrAL shall pay
particular attention to the designs of all energy systems
required for the PROJECT with emphasis towards conserving
energy. Particular attention shall be focused on the
different uses of the PROjEC.; and the different demands
for air conditicning, lightinq, etc.
3
.._. ..r .---..�...._ .. •_tip-::�.,
.
77,
.lam •.i.'4 — -!.--
1. Make periodic visits to the site to familiarize hinself
with the progress and quality of the work to determine
that the work is proc•_-eding in acccr2ance with the
Contract Doeus'ents and to submit his observations to the
CIT'. in writing within five (5) working days after each
visit
2. Assist the CITY in considering and evaluating any succcsticns
or mcdifi-cations which mi-ght be submitted by the-cn~__..c_..r
for the CI.:'S approval.
3. Assist the CIT: in matters relating to the inter_-et-.icn
of the Contract Documents.
4. Furnish any additional details or infcr.-.at_cn when
req---red at the job site fc- e\ecutlen of the v ...
5. Az3istCI._ and rake .:ri_ten recc.. .en-'at__ns to the CI..
On matters pertaining zo the Contractor's prc=csed Caa, ces
In matirlalo and dCL'.. -sn '?t :��� O: ^.St. ,_. .. a.^..,
cha:'-es In plans, and on --z relat"na to e\tra work
Or
or-_',ars and supa:er7ent7l a;r__-ents.
6. Check and :pp eve ihcp and er.._n. ;:;wings, sarles an..
ot! ?r sub.7_3zionz furnished by the Ccnt...__.._. retain a
cc _• of all shop and working drawings, duly aopro':ed by the
PF:I::CI, hL, for permanent CITY .records.
7. Review all testy reports required by the Contract Coeu:rents
and l:rovide the CITY with written evaluation of such
test reports.
8. tditnc s all tests as may be required to be witnessed by the
Contract Documents and provide the CITY with written
evaluation of all such tests.
9. Receive samples which are required to be furnished at the
jot) site; record data roceived and from whon; examine said
samples and nctitify the CITY of his approval or rejection
and maintain custody of approved samples.
10. After substantial completion, maM` a list of items for
correction before final inspection, and check each item
as it is corrected.
10
I
OL
'. .: ,��•�•�.., -. �.-.rA.M...• ram.. J.-+..�
11. Upon request by the CITY PROJECT DIRECT07 , attend and
report to the CITY on all required conferences held at
the job site.
12. Assist the CITY in matters relating to the Contractor's
schedules and reauests for procress pay-ents•
13. During the course of the 'CPr:, ensure that all guarantees,
certificates, Operation andmaintenance manuals,
schedules, spare parts and other it.?ms that have been
specified in the Contract Oocr=cnts, have been sub-itte-
and have been acarc:eri. Deliver all such .;to.s to the
CITY prior to the date of beneficial occupancy•
14. Furnish to the CITY within thirty (30) days after
cc-pleticn of the Construction Phases of the PRCJ�C:�
the ori.?inal of the Construction
Contract plans, re•:i s.-3 to iac_ ._ all changes or
rodi.ications to the deni._n . a--:e duri. , the Constr..ct
phas_.
At the cc-plet_on of conztr.:ction o: the ?�CJZ_ , the
PF:.:C:PAL shall deliver to the CITY .bitten certification that to
the .:-2st of the PRI.'.C:?AL'S kncwled�,C tho PPP..CJ:CT has been const_.,.tc
in acc r-anc,2 with CITY apprcvcd Construction plans and specifications
and CITY approved change orders; and shall furnish such other
written certificates as may be required by law and regulations
applicable to the PROJECT.
The Construction Phase shall be completed when the PRINCIPAL ,
has delivered the aforesaid certificates, incluJin? "as built"
plans, etc., to the CITY; and the City Commission has accepted said
pmi=.
During all Phases, the PRINCIPAL shall act as his own
reprentative to the CITY in all matters pertaining to the PROJECT.
The CITY will expedite its procedures and render timely
decisions to assist the PRINCIPAL in this phase.
St:CTMN IV - CITY'r, SMWICCS AND
Tne CITY shall furnish the PRu:ci AL with the following services
•
S. Submit the cor..olated ccnstruction contract -)laps and
specifications to the CITY for a complete and detailed
review and approval.
9. Conduct all necessary dry --run checks and assist in
obtaining all necessary permits fror all governmental
authorities having juri=dicticn over the P=OJ-ECT. The
Cl-,'.,*will assist the ?P.i.:CI?AL by expediting CIT.•s
procedures for this purrase.
10. Deliver to the CI^_ the comploted master set of
construction contract plans and specificaticns and
other related tarts of the c nstx.:otjCn Contract
Doe:.-ents in reproducible form.
The Ccn:s _r= __.. Ccc r. ` se shall be ccnsid3re3 - let_ cn
the CIa". ?h"C.a _5 a G;. :.:�_..t�:.. Cznt act f.:r th8 ^;) S.__=,_cn of
tt';•a 77a , b:.t in no case '.;:ter t"ian ni.._ty (20' days f=—n the cite c:
ty thZ to of the
pla.., • nd sa_cifi at__..> ready for
D.
1. Pre; are any aCG_nda, vith accur.panying dra�i-cs or othor
material as required, and suL-mit original of each to the
DI::ECTCR for approval and sicnature after which the
DIRECTOR will furnish a copy for each set of contract
documents prepared.
2. Assertible and furnish the CITY M,4NAuEF. data for publicity
releases.
3. Take part in pre -bid conferences with CITY and prospective
bidders as required.
The Bidding Phase shall be: considered completed on the Jay
the CITY executes a Construction Contract for the construction of
the PROJECT or ninety (90) (Lays after receipt of bids uhichevez cccu.:s first.
E. CC`: ;TPLICTION P11ASE
The Construction Phase shall commence with the award of the
Construction Contract. During the Construction Phase, upon
written authorization from the CITY, the PRINCIPAL shall:
ti
9
~•�•err«..,q..,.•.�.,.+...._.....,..� •.......
i
i
N
..—...... - . .
-J.
and information frorn existing CITY records and CITY files:
A. The CITY shall provide information reaardir.g its
requircrents for the PROJECT.
H. The CITY shall furnish a Certified Land Survey of the
site giving, as applicable, grades and linos of streets, alleys,
pavements and adjoining property; richt of way, restri::t_cns,
easements, enzrcachr-.ents, Zonina, deed restricti0.^.s, bounClarl:2s
and contours of the site; locati6ns, di-ensions and data fro:
existing records on file in the Depart:r.ent of Public ::ors of the
Cl-.'.Pertaining to existing- buildir.cs, of _. _ _:-2rents any sees;
and infcr^aticn concerninq available service utility lives both
pu!:l is and private.
C. I: the CIT'_ PRr.;ECT oIP.`C='C? cbserves or has been
nc*iflea in writing of any fault or defect in the PF0,;ECT or
noncc-fo r.3nce wit.,the Ctintra_.. DccUm:._nt7-, prc-.?t :r, tte, notice
thereof shall to given to the ?^:.:C:::.,..
D. The CI:. shall do all and bin _. _ of _r.e
bid:ji and con7,tructizln sets of the drawirQs and scecl,.a__.... ,
and lean all existing and aPPl_cabl_ C_,. aar,al
E. 'vac CITY shall appoint a to act as
liason . etwoon C:T'i and pm,,.,CIF AL, and the PRI::C:, NL will not
start work nor incur any expenses for any Phase of the WORK,
special con;:iticns or change orders without havini rtceivod
written aut:iori-_aticn from tilt? Ci,T-"S PROJi:CT �_V.' ,;!:R to do so.
Nothing contair.od herein --hall relieve the PP1.NC.PAL of any
respl risibility as provided under this Anrcemcnt.
,p. The CITY hall furnich all required testinq necessary
for the i'lio.ICCT, including core borin,s, tec:t pits, structural,
mechanical, chtrmlcal, soil, and mill and laboratory tests, and
the services of a soils ongincer or other special consultants
when dirt mt.d no-ces—nary by the PRINCIPAL; and the PKINCII'AL shall
be entitled to rely upon the accuracy, cuirploteness. and
Competence thereof. •.
1: `
__ r
G. The CITY reserves the right to retain the services of
a Professional Quantity Surveyor to pr%t•are Detailed Ccnstruct.
_
_
Cost Estimates based upon the Design Deveicpr^ent Documents and
-:�
the Construction Documents.
FOR SERVIC'S
. -
A. For professional .and technical services for the SC:;e-atic
Desi"n Phase, Design Development Phase, 3idding Phase, COns`ructisn
Cec'z--Cnt Phase and Construction Phase of the PRC.:EC"', as
outlined in SECT IC:I III hereof, the CITY acr,2es to pav, and the
PRINCIPAL agrees to accept, as a full pa, _.._ _or h.s ser:ic_s
the LU—P SU:M FEE of
which; :EE will hereinafter be call•'4- the BASS
This pa;-ent will be made ,monthly in proportion to the see:icys
per`.._med so that the ccmpensat.cn at the co-pietion of each . .ase
shall e.zu•3l the following percentages and amcunts e_ the tctal
......
BAD _� ...�.
ACC' '1' A"E7 C"
1. Sch,�natic Ces cn Phase 15.0
2. Desi;;n Develop-ent Phase 35.0
3. Construction Documents Phase 75.0
' +
4. Bidding Phase 80.0
_
5. Con�tructicn Phase
-
a. Shop Drawings 90.0
b. Contract Administration 100.0
•-,•—•".:—,••....•n cr .c .��;,,}... �,r«-..ay.��..i
6. Renc?cring Lump Sum :
'13
2n
C. In the event that the PP.OJBCT is constructed by the
use of multiple construction contracts (incremental biddi:?), then
the BASIC FEE will be proporticned during the various phases of
WORK in accordance with the estimated construction values.
_— _ --- — — SECT7 VI - srtr--;)uLE C? ;O?=
The PRI::C:PAL agrees that ti.7e is of the esnsnce and fur_.._.
• agrees to the WORK prc-ptly, dilicent_y and only c?cn, and
in strict conformance wit:i, specific authorization from the C.._
MANAGER in writing. The Project Langevity Schedule, a par_ c_
"A", was developed by both parties and indicates real; nacle
est_-ates of the times recuired to acco:-.plizh each of the , .as=s
of %tiOP..: as described hereinafter.
A.
The PF'1::C:7AL shall cc:'.?lete the Sc er. atic .esizn Phase wit.._n
• Ca1_:'.dar days after .:ritten aut:: :r..': the
C:.. ._......:_:? to 'eain PORK on this Phase.
_ The PR -.....:PAL shall complete the Phase
within calendar days after wr_t,.Qm aut`.:rizat_c� :.c-t
the CITY ...;^.,UE' to becin .:CFr on thin Phase.
C. CC' 7 iC' r• Pt;•.c�
The PRINCIPAL shall complete the Construction Cocu-.cats Phase
within calendar days after written authorization from the
CIT:' ',:7;•. , R to Legin ::OR:: on this Phase and in any cv,,nt no later
than _
Thy: 13idding Phase is cxp,:!ctcd to require calendar
days, if only a single bidding is used.
E.
The Con^truction Pha_.c will commvnec with the award of the
first Con::truetion Contract, if incremental bidding is used, or of the
Construction Contract, if a single bidding is used, and shill be
completed %-hen all of the following conditions have Neon completed:
1. The PP1.'.CI1"AL has delivered to the 'CITY written certification
that the PROJECT has been constructed in accordance wi..h the CITY
approved Contract Documents, including all approved change orders.
14 $2—.11111 0
2. The PRINCIPAL has deliver•?_9 to the CI'::' such other written
certificates as may be required by law and regulations.
_
3. The PRINCI?AL has delivered to the CITY "As -Built" dra••rings
113
as required under SECT!-.!; III E. 14.
4. The City Commission has accepted the PRC,:ECT by Resoluticn.
SEcTT VIZ - ADDITIC :AI. •:n?u AUTt!0P1Z. D BY THE CITY
A. The CITY reserves the right to increase the scope and amount
of the construction contract by directly authorizing the contr----.
to do extra or additional work without re.ui..ng the to
furnish prcfessicnal professicnal or technical services.
B. The PRI::C_?AL shall furnish lands, ping and inter-,._ des _ .
services which are normally a par_ of his ccntract docu:7ents and
specifications, as part of his basic services within the sti;•'la_23
LU:-1P SUM FEE
C. The CI^. reserves the right to authorize the ?.^.I::C:?'. to
prc•._.._ addlti nal services, if found neccssarr% by the CI. in
which case the fees for these services will bean a necot_a_e•a tas:_.
SE :r' JI - - Trr IC 7 ,w AC
The CIT': retains the right to ter:ciratc this :\grce-•_nt at ar_
time prior to completion of the WOP", without penalty to the CITY.
In that event termination of this Agreement shall be in writing
to the PR1::C1?AL and the PRINCIPAL shall be paid for sorviccs
ren.:ered in each co-nnleted PHASE prior to termination in accordance
with SECT:O:: V - CWHIE::SATIC:: FOR SERVICES, provided however that t`:!
PRINCIPAL is not in default under the terms of this Agreement. If,
how,.ver, the termination of this Agreement occurs during an incomplete
PHASE, then the PRINCIPAL shall be paid at the rate of two and
one-half (2.5) times Direct Technical Salary Expense for those
. •• -
services rendered in such incomplete PHASE provided that the PRI::CI'.;L
is not in default under the terms of this Agreement. In no case
however, will the CITY ray the PRI`aCIPAL a cheater amount for an
incomplete PHASE than would have been paid had the termination been
made at the completion of the PIIASE.
In the event of termination, all documents, plans, etc., as
set forth in SECTION XI - 0-;NERSHIP CF COCUX'ENTS shall become the
property of the CITY, with the same provisions of use as set 'crth
in said SECTIC'I XI.
SEC71C'I IX
The PRINCIPAL proposes to have the follswin-I specialii5ts,
either from his organization or as his consultants or associates,
to nerform the services indicated.:
A. Architectural
B. Structural
C. Mechanical
D. Electrical
E. La r.,,'-s c a= i.-
F. Civil
G. Space Planning
t
The PRINC:DAL will be resconzi!Dle for all the WCF.-* of h 3 _4 c n
7
0 rc:an, zation, and of his consultants or asscc�ates- Nothin= ccnt--_ned
ans Ac.:-2-2ment shall
in .hicreate any contractual relaticn bet-'-;een an_
the C!, It shall
*C:' CITY.
of zing for the PRI P A L any the sncctalissts work
be un tirstocJ that the PR1:;C1rAL is in no way relieved of anv
responsiLility under the terms of this Agreement by virtue of any
•
other prof,-!!;i;iL;nal who may associate with him in per:orm.ng the
WC P F,
.7 T
The fol.LL;winq professional services and work. by the PRINCIPAL
shall not be conniderod extra services but on the contrary shall
be connidtfted part of the W17111K of the PIZINCIVAL.
A. Revise the Construction Documents Phat:4, and Construction
pl.ins inJ --poci ficaL ions to reduce the cost of construction of the
PROJLCT to the final butbjeted or CITY approved amount for the
construction of the PFOJF.CT, if the amount of the lowest
acceptable bid received by the CITY for the construction
of the PROJECT is in excess of thl:! final amount budgeted or
-
approved for the cost of the construction contract of the
PF.OJECT.
`
B. Any other revisions suggested by the CITY that
are within the sccpe of the SvORK before_ the Design Develcpirent
-
Documents and Outline Specifications are approved by the
.. --
CITY. ?
----
SEC':'ICN '(I - 0: 7Fi?St{Ia 0r
A11 tracings,plans, drawincs, ••�ci:icat47:;ns, field
becks, survey information, maps, contract documents, reports
-
and other data develop,2,2 as a result of this Acrcemcnt shall
become the pro. ert;• of the CITY without restriction or
li-1t.2tion on their use. It is fur _...__ st puiat_3 that all
infor:^..t_cn developed as a nart of tt:^_ PFCJ=CT shall not be
by th.. C �..0 �'.•�'1u without written cement o: the
It is furth•2r understood by an,!between the parties
- y
that .any information, maps, contract Documents, reports,
tracing, plans, drawings, _-cifications, beo*-:s or any other
matter wha_scover which is given by the CITY to the PRIN'C71:PAL
.
pur ru,ant to this Ayrcer^ent shall at all titres remain the
prop-?rty of the CITY and shall not be used by the PRIN'CIPA-L
for any other pur ose whatnoover without the written consent
_ ,_—"___: _ _ - .._ �� •- _- •-�
of the CITY.
It is further understood that no press relea cs or
publicity is to be issued by thu PRINCIPAL without prior
submittal to the! CITY and written appLoval from the CITY.
_ ... •. _
SECTION XI I - AI:,I.it1) OF AGhr:F*1KNT
The PRINCIPAL warrantn th.,t he ha:; not employed or retiin•_i
-
any corp,uny or persons to solicit or secure this Agreement,
-'
that he has not paid or a(Irecd to hay any company or pernon any
fee, coirmission, percentage, brokerage fee, or gifts or any
other considerations contingent upon or'resultinq from the
-
award or m,ikiny of this A,jrecrir�nt.
17
-r.*...-..w
<,4 C
The PRINCI; AL also warrants that to the best of his k.no-alt-
and belief no Comanissioner, :!ayor or oth.-�r officer or employes
the CITY is interested directly or indirectly in the profits c.
emuluments of this Agreement or the job, work, or services for
the CITY in connr:ction with the contract or construction of th'.
PROJECT.
The PRINCIPAL shall not en_ -ace r'uring the period of this
Acrrement the services of any professional or technical person
who has been at any time during the period of this Agrc--.ent in
the ermplov of the CITY. This Foes not acply to retired enplo•.-e
of the CITY.
The PRI::CIPAL is.,awaze of t;,e contlict of interest :aw of
both the City of Miami and Dade County, Florida, and zqrces that
he shall Bally cc, -.ply in all respects with the terns of said
laws.
Thin Acr,�_,ement repres@nt., the _Mire and integrated
bet _-n the CITY and the PRI::CIP',I and ruc_rcedcs all prior
neC __atlons, reorrsentatlons or Acrc-t-enta, eitt:_r »rittQn or
oral. This Acirce^ent may be arenc'.;!d only by written ins.r-_neat
b, both the CITY and the IIPI:.CIPAL.
Sc :C: ?;I•' - SIi:'C�^-�O!`S :[� '.SS1^:5
The PRI::CiPAL shall make no or transfor of this
Agreement, or sublet, .assicn or tran:fi-r any pact of the tOKK
un,i,2r this Agreement without the written consent of the CITY.
This; Agr(etrtent ;hall be binding upon th` parties hereto, their
hairs, executors, legal represental.iven, succ,:!snors and a_;sik,ns.
XX - TPUT11 IN NFCOT T AT IONS
The PPINC'TPAL herr.by ccrtifir.s that w.ayo rates .and other
fac:tu.a1 unit co%t s suppnrt ing the cor-pon•:ation ate accurate.
COrnptute and current ,at the time of cuntractint) and that the
original contract price and any .-niditions thereto -•hall be
adjiv; tcd to ca.clude .any sionrfirant sum whrmc the CITY determir.:s
the contract price was incrcw.ed glue to ,inaccurate, incomplete
or non -current wage :ate •and gather factual unit cost. Such
aJju-:tr.•nt: shallbc in -We within one year following the end of
the Contract.
18 S2--1140
1
zA
�.� �r_.N.r......a. ,.. Tom;..... .,.•.�...........�
..r_..._.+sue. •. .1-, . ..
SF.C7ZC:1 YVI - RIGHT TO AUDIT
The CITY reserves the right to audit the records of the
PRL':CIPAL any tire during the prosecution of this Agreement
and for a period of one year after final payrcnt is made under
this Agreement.
Notwithstandinc any other provisions of this Agreement,
in no event Shall the payment of the LC:*? SL:d FEE .:714-er
herein, enable the PRINCI 1•.L to earn a profit or nore than
pEFC ... (201) of the Lt:.".P SU." At the ^..q of the
final _ncr_rent of that LL'.'? SUM FL.. is due to he ?:!id ty the
CITY to the PrI..CZPAL pursuant to the terns of SECTZ,,:1 V herein,
the PRI:.C__..., shall sutmit to the CITY a cert.=_cat:_.. of his
total cost., iacurre.. and profit real.-<2d in pre•._--_ng the basic
services as outaed in 5EC':IC:. ZZZ nerei.^.. If sue.. cer________ ..
indicate: in e:•:cez. D_ thy_ r.a:._.. .. set fcrth ate._ the
PRINCIPAL shall rem__ any o•✓er_ce to the CZ-,Y. The
CITY res?r.'sthr2 right to au�it tho and reh_...Z-., of the
PRINCIPAL and to adj st the aro--n_ cf any r_. .•-_.._ in the
light of said audit. In _alc'.:lat.. the _ inc-r.__ t;
the Pt I::CI:i+L'S own staff, the shall use a nOrcentace
overhead appl-ed to the DI?EC. SA:.:;F E:,.' as defined
in SiC:IC:. II herein. The ;er_enta•:c over^_ad shall to o' :a: to
the actual percenta;e overhead p.irtainina for all wor
in the last t.:elvc (12) month period pre__,1in.; the date of this
Contract for which data arc available. All services provided by
subcontractors to the PRI::CIPT%L shall be incluJcd at the
actual -font paid by the PRINCIPAL and the percentatje overhead
shall not apply.
S1:CT:O:: XVI I AND I`:DCSi':tI'IC''!'ION
The PRINCIPAL shall provide insurance as required hcreinbelow
prior to commencing work in this. contract.
19
.
The PRII:CIrAL shall pay all claims and losses of any nature
-
whitscevcr in connection thercwith and shall defend all suits :n
-
the name-- of the CIT't when applicable, and shall pay all costs an3
judc-e:r,?r.ts which -ay issue therer_n.
_-
-•- --- — --- -" ''
The PRI":CIPAL shall maintain during the terms of this A-,rcerent
the :ollowinr: insurance:
A. Public Liability insurance in a.-ounts not less than
$100, :0�. 00 per : eraon and $33C,.OQf/.,�O per acci-.?nt for tolil'f
injury and S50,"^.0.00 per accicent for property da.7ace.
—
B. Auto=bile Liability Insurance covering all owned, non -e3,
and ..-r^_ :e^i,_.e _n amoun}z as ind.cat.,i .n Para,ra_h 'A' abc.=.
C. Pr^fossicr.al Liability Insurance in a mini -um a^oust of
all ii::bil.ty aria., out of ,.ne terms ,._
-... :'-..
this
D. ... _"� _.� Ll...•1 �. ty :n3C.ranC_ in am,^,tnts as ln�-cat_... i..
'A' above.
_
E. S4nr.,.ran'� Co-��r.sat.�n Insur3.^. in the a-our._s.
- --
The _....__ante cc.__.;e re .red shall inclL5e thcse cl �si:__a:erns
as 1. . - n z _-... -,.rd 1. at.iIt c:St
nearly reflect the cp^ raticns of the
All insurance politics shall be issued by co::pan:os auttiori.?d
to do t: �.... uncicr the laws of the State of Flcrida; and whit:
are approved .iccording to speci f icationa of the Prcper ty
of the CITY.
The Pf?t::c:IP?,I, shall furnish certificate of insurance to the
CITY prior to the comni.2ncemr•nt of operations, which certificates
shall ci�:,rrly indioated that the PRI::CIPAL his obtained insuran_a
_.. .... __ _ __.....r_._ .. _.
in thn tylrn, amount and choral f ication .as required for strict
_ __... _ ._..._ ._...__.
complianco with thin .election and that no material change or
cancelIat:un of the in::ur.,nce !:hall be LLIOCtIVO WithJUt the
thirty (30) days written notice to the CITY.
Compliance with the forotjoinc, requrretnentz shall not relieve
the P111-NC-IVAL of ht:; li.ablity and oblitjaticns unuer this Sectic-.
'
or um)-rr any portion of tht-- Agrc(�mcnt.
_
20
P�
Eel
M
}hilt - ^IGIiT Or D£C,'SIC`:S
All services shall be performed by the PRIN C:PAL to the
satisfaction of the Director of Solid :-:ante who shall decide
all questions, difficulties and disputes of whatever nature which
may arise under or by reason of this Agreement, the prosecution
and fulfillment of the services hereunder, and the character,
quality, amount, and value thereof, and the DI?_.Z. 2 'S decisions
upon all claims, questions of fact, and disputes shall be
final, conclusive and binding, upon the parties hereto, unless
suc: determination is clearly ar*._ra or :nr=�,.nabie. In
the even_ that the PRINCI...L does not ccr.c.:. in the judze.nent cf
the as to any dec_5.cn made by him, the PRI::CI? L shall
present his written objections to the Ci.'_ X.7,::AG R; and the
D:. CTCR and the PRINC12AL shall ab,ce b; the decision of the
Adj•.stmer.t of cc... _nsat-cn and ccnt_a.._ time teca:;Ze
of an: chi.. _es in the .:OR:, that :7i ^t becc.._ or be deer-ed
desirable as the •:OR., progresses shall be revic•. ad by the Di' y_ C7,
and the CI:": and sutm_tted to the C,7 C:.....,...IC:. :or
approval.
A. The PR:::CIPAL shall not discriminate 3c3ir-st any emplo;ee
or applicant for employment because of race, eoler, religion,
sex, or nat..ral origin. The PRI;:C1: AL shall fake of f ir:.at.:e action
to en:.urn that applicants are employed, and the employees are
treated during employment, without regard to their race, color,
religion, sex, or natural origin. Such action shall include, but
not be limited to, the following: Employront, upgrading, demotion,
or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or
termination; rates of pay or othor forms of compensation; and
selection for traLnir.,;, including al.prvnticeship. The PRINCIPAL
agrees to Yost in conspicuous places, available to employees and
applicants for employment, notices to be provided by the Personnel
Officer setting forth the provisions of this Equal Opportunity
Clause.
B. The PRINCIPAL shall, in all solicitations or advertisements
for employees placed by or on behalf of the PRINCIPAL. state that
21•
-
all rualified applicants will receive consideration for employrent
without regard to race, color, religion, sex or national origin.
C. The PRINCIPAL shall send to each labor union or representati':e
��;�,:.•,,,�a
of workers with which he has collective bar,aining agreement
a,,.,�,.,,d•_. ti„�.�
- -
or other cc^._race or understanding, a notice, to be provide; by the
aaer.cv Personnel Officer, advisir.g the labor union or workers'
reoresentati•:e of the contractor's cc-rnit-ents under this Equal
Opportunity clause, and shall post copies of the notice in
cons_•_cous places available to employees and applicants for
erraloyrent.
0. The ?: I:iL:.-. i, shall with all provisl ns .._ Effect,tive
Order No. 112+6 of September 24, 1965, as amended b•_ Executive
Omer NO. 11375 of Oct.,rer 13, .1967, and of the rules, recu:aticns
_
and relevant orders of 'he Secret . of abor.
�,
E. The ?R_.:C:7AL shall furnish all in=c_-atics and ._- its
._ ,,� •,.,,,,,,�.
..:ec-___:e Order No. 11.46 of Septemmber 2.4, 1965, as
_ - - ��• ••: _-.= r ..
amen. c by Executive Or _r No. 1137�, of C tc er 13, 1967, and b..
•
the rul•_s, requllt_,cns and order cf the _-'Cr_tar- o: Labor, cr
'
pur.,,_=t the-�to, and will per. -it access to his bc--k , reccr._., an..
acccunts by the contracting agency and the Secretar% of Labor for
• y,.
purposes of investigation to asccrtaia ccrm.pliance with such rules,
reaulaticns and orders.
P. In the event of the PRINCI:'AL'C� noncompliance with the
- -
Equa.) l Or;:•rtunity clause of this contract or with any of said
rules, regulations or orders, this contract may be canceled,
terminatcrd or suspended, in whole or in part and the PRINCIPAL may
be declared ineli,iblo for furthrr CITY contracts in accordance
with pro,-eduren authorized in Cxecutive Order No. 11246 of
- -� --- -- --� ^- ---�
SOJA,!rbor 24, 1965, as am,•ntled by Executive Order No. 11375 of
Octubor 13, 19G7, or by rule, regulation or order of the Secretary
of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law.
C. The PRI::CIrm, shill inclu,le the provisions of XIX A through
XI:< C in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by
.
rules, rcyul.,tiuns or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued
22 �2`•�•(
M
1
c.
pursuant to Section 20.1 of Executi•;e Order No. 11246 of September 24,
- -
1965, as amended by Executive Order No. 11375 of Cctcber 13, 1967,
so th.it such previsions will be binding uprn each subcontractor
or vendor. The PRINCIPAL shall take such action with respect to
any subc^ntractor or purchase order as the contracting agency :-,ay
_
direct as a means of enforcing such pro•:isions, including sanctions
- -,
.
m for nonccoliance. Provided -- =. however that in the event the PRI::'L
-
bec::-es involved in, or is threatened wit:^., liti;s_icn with a
-
subcontractor or vendor as a result of such direc__�n the
_
contrac • __ac--nc. , the PRINC_PAL may rcc Est t.._ __^Y _o en.__ �...�
such lit -at:c,n co protect the interast� of _.._ _._.
The C:.. herebv appr..-2s the following firm wh:_,, the ??_.•�_:.
prcacseo to encace to _ rc. _ _ consulti. _ ser : ices for the ?RCjE::T,
.. - ••- -
as subco❑ __. ctor to the PRi::Cii :w:
_ The F??I::CI^=+L shill furnish the CI.Y with a ccp, of the sub ont_act
agr^_err.ent.
+ The PRINCIPAL shall not subcontract for -ether consulting services
-• without prior written approv.il of the CI:'Y.
S EC,r 7 C'N xMI - CC"••,TPI'CTICa Or ACP.I f"ti:":T
The partics hereto agree that thin Agroument shall be construed
and enforced according to the laws, statutes and case law of the
•_..� M__ St.lic of rlurida.
23
K �:,
I
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hercto have, through their proper
corporate officials, executed this Agreement, the day and year
first above sat forth.
ATTEST:
ATTEST:
City
A TO CONTE""T
Director,
By:
THE CITY CF MI.7!--MI (a municipal
ccr=oration of the State cf
Flor---*a)
By:
CS .:3naCer
APPP'-%*ED AS TO FOILM & =zFEECTNISS
City Attorney
July 9, 1982
Dear architect/Engineer:
We are pleased to send you the attached announcement requesting
professional services to renovate Building A of the Little
Havana Community: Center, 900 S.W. 1st Street, Miami, Florida.
We invite you to send us your expression of interest for this
project.
Sinc eiy
Cath., Lef ; assistant Director
Department of Community Development
1)(P,kKT141\1 of 4 ()%jw ♦)11 }',t.l)i".tt\1 PU Boy itiJ'()6 . M14-1. flof 04 33133
82-1ILI;
i
NOTE:
Copy sent to architectural and engineering firms;
advertisement placed in Miami News, Miami Times,
Diario de las Americas and El Expresso.
REQUEST FOR LETTERS OF INTEREST
The City of Miami is seeking a professional consulting firm to
render the necessary professional and technical services for the
design development and renovation of Building A of the Little
Havana Community Center, 900 S.W. 1st Street, Miami, Florida.
The building was formerly a church and is presently used for of-
fices and limited cultural events.
A Master Plan for the renovation of the facility was adopted by
the City Commission by Resolution 82-447. It is intended that
the renovation will follow the design concept outlined in the
Master Plan, which proposes a fully equipped theatre and expanded
office space. The Master Plan is available for review and exami-
nation at 1143 N.W. llth Street, Miami, Fla.
Each interested firm should submit a standard 254 form, brochure,
and a letter describing its experience in adaptive reuse/interior
renovation, in making cost estimates, and should outline back-
ground of team members who would participate in this project.
The City selection procedures for contracting the professional
services will follow City Ordinance No. 8965 and Chapter 287 of
the Florida Statutes.
Send letter of interest and backc:round information to:
Cathy Leff
Assistant Director
Department of Community
P.O. Box 330708
1145 N.W. llth Street
Miami, Florida 33133
(305) 579-6853
On or before 5:00 p.m., August 9, 1962.
Development
82-114 0