Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-83-0108J-83-71 R R RESOLUTION NO. S"_400' A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE OVERTOWN URBAN ACTIVITIES INITIATIVES PROJECT GRANT APPLI- CATION AMENDMENT; RECOMMENDING THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMIT THE AMENDED GRANT APPLICATION TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR FUNDING UNDER SECTION 3 OF THE URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION ACT OF 1964, AS AMENDED; FURTHER, AFFIRMING THE INTENTION OF THE CITY TO PROVIDE EIGHTY FIVE PERCENT (85%) OF THE REQUIRED ADDITIONAL LOCAL MATCH TO THE GRANT. WHEREAS, the City of Miami is desirous of initiating redevelopment activity adjacent to the Overtown Transit Station; and WHEREAS, the City of Miami has approved the Overtown Redevelopment Plan (Resolution 79-724) on October 30, 1979, and the Southeast Overtown Park West Community Redevelopment Plan (Resolution 82-755) on July 29, 1982, both of which propose the redevelopment of the area adjacent to the Overtown Transit Station; and WHEREAS, Dade County, with the cooperation of the City of Miami, submitted an application (County Commission Resolution R-1592-80) to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Urban Mass Transit Administration Urban Initiatives Program for $6,770,677 in order to acquire land adjacent to the Overtown Station; and WHEREAS, on June 3, 1982 the U.S. Department of Transportation awarded a grant to Dade County for redevelopment adjacent to the Overtown Transit Station; and WHEREAS, pursuant to City Commission Resolution 82-940 the City of Miami executed an Intergovernmental Cooperation Agreement with Dade County for the Overtown Urban Initiatives Projects which assigns major project implementation responsibility to the City of Miami and commits the City to provide 85% of the required local match for the UMTA Grant; and WHEREAS, additional funding of $4,042,616 is needed to complete the proposed acquisition of the original four (4) blocks located west of the Overtown Transit Station and it has been determined that it would be advantageous to acquire an additional FEB 10 1983 two (2) blocks southeast of the Overtown Transit Station for $5,119,256 in order to complete the project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The Overtown urban Initiative Project Grant Application Amendment prepared by Metropolitan Dade County, dated January, 1983, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference, is hereby approved: Section 2. The Commission recommends to the Dade County Board of County Commissioners the submittal of the Overtown Urban Initiative Project Grant Applicant Amendment to the U.S. Depart- ment of Transportation. Section 3. The Commission affirms the City's intention to provide 85% of the required local match for the Overtown Urban Initiatives Project for both the original and amended applica- tions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this loth day of February , 1983. MAUO"�r. 'WEWW7 Mayor ATTEST: PH G. ONGIE City Clerk PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: q0EP E. MAXWEL-t As istant City Attorney APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: kk� _, SE R. GARCIA-PEDROSA ity Attorney wpc/pb/047/(2) -2- 8 S"108: f CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA 30 INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDffly, MANAGER'S OFFICE 1983 JAN 31 P14 19. 57 To Howard V. Gary DATE January 31, 1983 FILE. City Manager SUBJECT. Overtown Urban Initiatives Program FROM Herbert Bailey REFERENCES. Assistant City Manager Overtown Park/West Proje ENCLOSURES. It is recommended that the City Commission approve the amended Project Grant Application to United States Department of Trans- portation for the Overtown Urban Initiatives Project, reaffirm the City's intention to fund 85% of the required local grant match and request that Dade County sub- mit this application to the federal government per the attached resolution. In 1979 the Miami City Commission approved the Overtown Redevelop- ment Plan which called for the redevelopment of the area adjacent to the Overtown Transit Station for high intensity commercial and residential development. The United States Department of Transportation Urban Initiatives Grant Program was identified as a source of funding for this pro- ject and the City staff assisted Dade County in the preparations of a grant application. On December 2, 1980 the Dade County Commis- sion approved the submittal of a grant application requesting $6,962,400 in federal funding to aid in financing land acquisition, relocation, demolition, site clearance, preparation and disposition of a four -block area immediately west of the Overtown Transit Station. A total of $6,770,672 has since been awarded for this project: $470,672 on December 18, 1981 for evironmental activities and other staff and consultant activities; and $6,300,000 on June 14, 1982 for land acquisition, relocation and demolition, professional services, project administration and other costs associated with the project. The accomplishments in this project to date include: the comple- tion of the Black Equity Participation Plan; initiation of develop- ment of procedural guidelines for implementation of the Plan; initi- ation of the preparation of the land acquisition schedule; and initiation of the appraisal process. 83-1®8Y 01 0 Howard V. Gary City Manager January 31, 1983 The City will assume major responsibility for project implementa- tion which has been delineated in the Intergrovernmental Corpora- tion Agreement between the City and County which was approved by the City Commission on October 4, 1982 (Resolution No. 82-940). These responsibilities include project marketing, citizen parti- cipation and land disposition and day to day project monitoring. Project management will be provided by the Southeast Overtown/ Park West Project Office. The additional funding to be requested, via this application, will be used to finance additional land acquisition costs in the four -block area originally included in the Overtown Urban Initiatives Project -- irregularly bounded by Northwest 6th Street, Northwest 9th Street, Northwest 8th Street, Northwest 1st Court, Northwest 3rd Avenue, and Northwest 2nd Avenue -- and the expansion of the project to include two blocks located southwest of the Overtown Transit Station -- bounded by Northwest 6th Street, the METRORAIL right-of-way (approximately Norhtwest 1st Court), Northwest Sth Street and Northwest 2nd Avenue. This two -block area would be acquired and cleared in order to enhance overall redevelopment of the Overtown Station Area. The redevelop- ment of these two blocks is consistent with the Southeast Overtown/ Park West Community Redevelopment Plan which was approved by the City of Miami Commission on July 29, 1982 (Resolution No. 82-755). The total cost of the proposed amendment is $9,161,872. The Federal grant will cover 75% of this cost, or $6,871,404. The 25% local share required ($2,290,468) will be provided as follows: 85% ($1,946,897) from the City of Miami and 15% (343,571) from Dade County. It is anticipated that City funding will be provided by the Community Development Block Grant Program. This local match will be in addition to the $1,438,767 which the City has committed for the original application. It is anticipated that funding may be forthcoming form the State of Florida which will reduce the required local share. MS:dr ATTACHMENT 83-108: I FACT SHEET OVERTOWN URBAN INITIATIVES PROJECT AMENDMENT APPLICATION I. Additional Project Costs Existing Project Property Additional Property South of Project Area It. Federal Funding Request (75%) III. Local Funding Alternatives A. Total Local Share (25%) B. Based on Existing Local Funding Formula - City of Miami Community Development - Dade County Community Development C. Based on Assumption of State Funding - Florida Department of Transportation (12.5% of Federal Share) - City of Miami - Dade County IV. Schedule for Application Process A. Draft Application Submitted 01/17/33 B. Public Hearing 02/01/83 C. Submittal of Final Application 02/07/33 D. UMTA Response to Request (Expected) 03/15/93 $ 41,042,616 5,119,256 Total $ 9,161,872 $ 6,871,404 $ 2,290,468 $ 1,946,897 343,571 • . $ 853,925 1,216,812 214,731 DRAFT APPLICATION SECTION 3 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT GRANT FOR OVERTOWN URBAN INITIATIVES PROJECT (AMENDMENT) METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA JANUARY9 1983 ►- 10 3; 0 0 DRAFT APPLICATION SECTION 3 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT GRANT FOR OVERTOWN URBAN INITIATIVES PROJECT (AMENDMENT) SUBMITTED TO URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION BY METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA JANUARY, 1983 •S TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PART I Application Form 1 PART II (Not applicable to UMTA Programs) PART III Budget Information Forms 2 PART IV Program Narrative 8 Exhibits: A. Project Description 8 B. Transit System Overview and 12 Urbanized Area Description Information C. Project Justification 15 D. Project Financing 27 I. Labor 28 J. Public Hearing 31 K. Relocation 32 L. Protection of the Environment 33 PART V Assurances 31; A. Authorizing Resolution 4134 B. Opinion of Counsel L: U 1 V' 51 c PART I APPLICATION FARM ,s S0-1 6: r;; ApiDrtwal Ne. ?+l-R�tl• FEDERAL ASSIS 'ANCE Z APPu• +• NUMBER 3. A . "MeElt CANrs APPLI. APPLICA• DENT, b. DATE Year month day 1. TYPE PKAPPLICATION 6. DATE I'd*? "f0*� dog ACTION © APPLICATION CATION 19 ftEr! ASSIGNED 19 (Nnrk ap.. ❑ NOTIFICATION OF INTENT (OpQ �b1e garmlaw o':) ❑ REPORT OF FEDERAL ACTION Plank /. LEGAL APPLICANT/RECIPIENT S. FEDERAL EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO. a. AppllcantHam ; Metropolitan Dade County 56-6000573 b.OrglaltationUnit Transportation Administration e. Streat/P.O. Bad : 44 West Flagl er Street 6. P O. a. NUMBER P P I. 15p P 1 b. TITLE d. city ; Miami . aseary ; Dade GRAM r. state :Florida B r,,�a: 33130 (From Urban Mass Trans rtation ,zip h. C3n%d Pomp (Name Alan C. Wulkan Pomptalog) Caat Capital Improvement Grant & tr►r;nhoae No.) 305 579-3802 7. TITLE AND DESCRIPTION OF APFLICANrs PROJECT B. TYPE OF APPLICANT/RECIPIENT A -State H-Commuorq Asiha ASteey Metropolitan Dade County B-interstata I- Nigher Etact0enal Instntutiea FSubstete )-Inaion Trlfa District Overtown Urban Initiatives Project K-0ther (Speeify)r D-County E-city F-Sthool Dlst►id C-Speeiel Purpose District lists appropriate fetter 9. TYPE OF ASSISTANCE MBnic Grant D-Inswa sce B-'upplsmental Grant E-0UW Cater sppro- C-Lesa priate kte ., 10. AREA OF PROJECT IMPACT (lames of cities, sou oW. 11. ESTIMATED NUM- 12. TYPE OF APPLICATION Staten, etc.) BER OF PEt43ONS BENEFITING A -Now C-Rerition E-Aegnsentation Dade County, Florida B-Renewil D-Contmuatloa soup appropriate klter 13. PROPOSED FUNDING 14. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS OF: 15. TYPE OF CHANGE (For tat or lta) A-locrase Dollers F-0tW (SpetWol: B-Oeuesse Oolls s a. M-DERAL i 1 4 .JO a. APPLICANT h PROJECT 4 6 -co 13 14 1 5 14 Dom -lot:":: citation b. APPLICANT E-Cencellatien G STATE ( 1L PROJECT START 17. PROJECT DATE roar *wWA day DURATION ruler appro- j''''�'"� d. LOCAL .00 19 Monthe prints let:erle) L J _1_Li! a. OT!IER .03 IL EETIMATED DATE TO Year mouth day 12. EXISTING FEDERAL IDENTIFICAVON NI-MBER I. TOTAL S 9 1 1 7 2 .00 FEDERAL AGENCY No 19 FL-03-0064 20. FEDERAL AGENCY TO .9ECCIVE REQUEST (Name, City. State. ZIP toile) 21. REE"AARKS ADDED Urban Mass Transportation Administration, Atlanta, GA 30309 p V_ 13 No s 22" a. Te 11, be:t of my anorldts and hallat, b. If requusd by OYB Cl.cuh► A -SS !his etplicatian was submitted, pursuant In on. No re. Rerpocee date in this preeppiiuGan/application an structnoss therNa, to appropriate eltsrirthousas and all raca ponsn are attaad: sponse ettached THE true and correct, IN$ dmument het bear APPLICANT duly authorited by the rinming body at Dade County Planning Department ❑ ❑ CERTIFICS the applicant and 0.I spplicntt will comply (1) THAT► with the ersthvd usuroaces If the WWII- 0 South Florida, Regional Planning Council ❑ ❑ ante is sFproovd• (3) State of Florida Clearing House ❑ ❑ 23. a. TYPED NAME AND TITLE L SIGNATURE C. OAn SIGNED CERTIFYING M. R. Stierheim Yeast mowis day SEPRE• ENTATIVE County Manager is 24. AGENCY NAME 2& APPLICA• Year month day TION RCCEIVED 19 26. ORGANIZATIONAL Ult1T 27. ADMINISTILkTIVE OFFICE 2L FE^ERAL APPLICATION IDENTIFICATION 29. ADDRESS 30. FEDERAL GRANT I1DE1vTIFit:A7iO1`t 31. ACTION TAKEN 32• rutmiNG Your month day S 1. Year mons'i Jay a. WADED a. FEDERAL = CO ST,2rTIfIG 13. ACTI^N_DATE ► 19 DIiC 19 9. REJECTED b. PPPIICANT .03 35. CONTACT FOR 1. LITIONAL INFORM:.- 3L 1'.'ar w.on'is day e: Rt_T'JRNEO FOR e. STATE GO TION (Name and telephone number) ENDING LOCAL .00 CATE 19 37. REMARKS ADDEO 13 all. V:f;:;RED s. CTNER .00 . (:) a. WiT"JP,AWN r. TOTAL S .00 I] Ye: ONO 9L a. In ta►Ing above s:t••n, any tozr.merts racei"ll trom Vavl-Wi- -+ ware can. b. FEDEn.:L PCENCY A -SS OFFICIAL It a;ancy itrpo:..o is due uruer prsris .,as cat Part 1. Gt"., 1.ic::sr A.-N: (::a.a and teiephone ss.r.l FEDr a.L 1 __NCY .::.ts bran cr is Wing made. A-95 Al.;IWN i 4:4_JUl STPNDAP!S ►CRM :.:% Pew. ) :'?-75) Preteriat by 425A. t e..e. Les.-»w+n.-.t t :r..,. • r :h7 f MY PART II (NOT APPLICABLE TO UMTA) 1j 8o-i()$" 0 0 PART III BUDGET FORTIS <a. ♦; Grant Program. funf:raA or federal Activity Ca:a:oo No. /al lb) 1.Sec. 3 Capital 20.500 2. { CitY of Miami <.Jade County 5. TOTALS S. Cb;ect Class Cerpries a. ►PCrsorrml b. Frin3-e Benefits c. T-:ti•cl d. -cuipment C. Sv;Iptics i. Contractual h. O:fcr i. Tu:.11 Dirco Chlrg.s j. 1.n:1:rest CharS:t 1 <. IOTA L S �?. roc-2•t1ln��r��� PART III — BUDGET INFORMATION P-!" i SECTION A — BUDGET SUMMARY Estimated Unoblio_td Funds Federal Non•Fadaral lcJ (A) S 6,871,404 Is S 1,946,897 - 343,571 g S2.290,468 S SECTION 8 — BUDGET CATEGORIES Naw Of RCViaed 1•.u4301 Federal NonJederal b1 Iri is E Grant P►o4•am. Funct&on or Activity l_IUMTA Section 3 t 121 Dade County ill City of Miami Isai 157,189.50 c 7,859.50 IS 44,537.00 ;S _ 36,153.75 1,807.75 1 10,243.50 Total 10 6 871 404 1,946,897 343 571 j S 9,161 ,872 I est t r S 209,586.00 ;' 48,205.00 i I Y 3,000.00 150.00 850.00 4,000.00 1,207,192.50 60 359.75 342 037.75 1,609,590.00 5,093,524.50 254,676.25 1,443,165.25 6,791,366.00 ,t 227,745.00 11,387.75 64,527.25 303,660.00 I t • 189,465.00 142,098.75 7,105.00 40,261.25 S 6,871 ,404.00 S 343,571 .00 _ S 1,946,897.00 S S 9,161 ,872.00 ( IS = I - PAnT III — BUDGET INFORMATION pM11 w0. 09 wOt�A (j' � Paq" 2 — SECTION C — NON•FEDEnAL RESOURCt: i let TOTALS*1 lal GRANT PROGRAI►1 thl APPLICANT let STATE Idl OTHER SOUpC[S S S S 1 E 343.571 9. Dade Count .0. 11. s 5 1 s 2,290,468 12. TOTALS SECTION D —FORECASTED CASH NEEDS • 41% OYar1N Tout for lat Vear itt Quvter 2�d Ouarur 7•d Owrur 13. Fed,!ral UM (-Se�.�l S 5,641 833.00 2 940,306.00 940 305.00 1r., x,�•Fedcr�+ Dade Co. & City f M'atM 1 880 611 .00 r 23,00 3,761 .221 .00 15.TOTAL s 7,522,444.00 SECTION E — BUDGET ESTIMATES OF FEDERAL FUNDS NEEDED FOR BALANCE OF 1HE PROJECT t • M FUTURE FUNDING PERIODS IVEARSI f lal GRANT PROGRAM Ibl F InST 10 SECOND IJI THInD tel FOURTH 1G. (Section 3 s 769 161.00 s 460 410 00 s 17. Dade County 38A58,00 :a. 1 y o iami 217 929.00 130,449,00 19' s 1,025,548.00 s 613 880.00 s s 20. TOTALS SECTION F —OTHER BUDGET INFORMATION IAttacf+add.t.onat Sheets rl NOCtWWI 21. Direct Charges: 22. IntlrrCct Charges: 23. nern3rks: LJ \J Additional Instructions for Capital Grant Application (For Part III, Section F) ESTIMATED PROJECT BUDGET Direct Salaries $ 209,586 Fringes 48,205 Direct Expenses: Travel 6,000 Suppliers 4,000 Contingency 303,660 313,660 Contractual 1,609,590 Land Acquisition, Relocation, Demolition 6,791,366 Indirect Costs 189,465 Estimated Project Cost $9,161,872 FEDERAL GRANT REQUESTED (75% of project cost 6,871,404 LOCAL CONTRIBUTION (25% of project cost) 2,290,468 The local contribution will be made by Metropolitan Dade County and the City of Miami. It is further understood that no refund or reduction of the local con- tribution shall be made at any time unless there is at that same time at refund of a proportional amount of the federal grant. G �' '%0 ao �� 1E1>0 w OVERTOWN URBAN INITIATIVES PROJECT ADDITIONAL FUNDING REQUIREMENTS I. Existing Project Property Project Budget Line Item Code Description 30.15.00 30.06.00 31.00.00 30.10.00 30.16.00 32.00.00 Subtotal: Subtotal: Professional Services Contracts - Legal Services - Appraisal Services - Relocation Services - Environmental Services Project Sponsor Force Account - Legal Services - Appraisal Services - Relocation Services - Environmental Services Land Acquisition Relocation Demolition Project Administration Contingency Gross Project Cost Revenue Financing Net Project Cost UMTA Snare (75%) Local Share (25%) II. Add'1 Property South of Project Area 30.08.00 Professional Services Contracts 30.15.00 Project Sponsor Force Account 30.06.00 Land Acquisition 31.00.00 Relocation 30.10.00 Demolition 30.16.00 Project Administration 32.00.00 Contingency -5- n_. Amount $ 769,856 575,734 2,093,366 363,000 -0- 137,000 103,660 $4,042,616 -0- $4,042,616 S3,031,962 41 $1,010,654 $ 132,000 132,000 4,000,000 240,000 95,000 320,256 200,000 Pi 0 Subtotal: Gross Project Cost Revenue Financing Subtotal: Net Project Cost UMTA Share (75%) Local Share (25%) III. TOTALS: Net Project Cost UMTA Share (75%) Local Share (25%) $ 5,119,256 -0- $ 5,119,256 3,839,442 1,279,814 $ 9,161,872 $ 6,871,404 $ 2,290.468 .; 0 PROPOSED PROJECT BUDGET GRANT PROJECT NO.: FL-03-0064-02 APPLICANT: Metropolitan Dade County The project budget and corresponding cost estimates are as follows: Project Budget Line Item Code Description Amount 30.08.00 Professional Services Contracts $ 1,087,856 - Legal Services - Appraisal Services - Relocation Services - Environmental Services 30.15.00 Project Sponsor Force Account $ 893,734 - Legal Services - Appraisal Services - Relocation Services - Environmental Services 30.06.00 Land Acquisition $ 11,687,366 31.00.00 Relocation 2,162,000 30.10.00 Demolition 000 30.16.00 Project Administration 815,2 32.00.00 Contingency , GROSS PROJECT COST $ 17,625,212 Revenue Financing 41 NET PROJECT COST UMTA SHARE $ 13,642,076 Local Share 3,983,136 Maximum Federal Funds to be expended under this project $ 13,642,076 S "'i ..-'r JL - -7- 0 li PART IV PROGRAM NARRATIVE •t 0 EXHIBIT A: PROJECT DESCRIPTION .; 0 EXHIBIT A: PROJECT DESCRIPTION I. Increased Assessed Land Valuations Since the submission of the application for funding of the four -block Overtown Urban Initiatives Project in 1980, the estimated cost of land acquisition for that four block area has increased substantially. This has been primarily due to recent condemnation proceedings in blocks located north of the project site, which has caused the value of adjacent properties to escalate. The line item for land acquisition in the existing project budget provides $5,594,000. Recent estimates indicate that the land acquisition process will cost $7,687,366. Therefore $2,093,366 in additional funding is requested for this line item. The acquisition estimate is based on $16.50 per square foot for the land area. This value is derived from recent appraisals in the block between N.W. 8th and 9th Streets and N.W. 1st and 2nd Avenues. The value of this block which is adjacent to the Overtown Transit Station, the transit line and the Florida East Coast Right -of -Way was $12.00 per square foot as of September, 1981. To account for the time lapse, this value was increased to $15.00 per square foot plus 10% for the project area. With a total of 465,901 square feet of land in the area, this totals $7,687,366 in acquisition costs. II. Expansion of Project Area The redevelopment proposed for the four -block project area west of the Overtown Transit Station is predicated upon its proximity to the emerging downtown govern- ment center, as well as to the Overtown Station. In order to maximize the potential for redevelopment it is proposed that two additional blocks lying south and southwest of the Overtown Transit Station be acquired and cleared. The boundaries of this area are N.W. 6th Street on the north, the METRORAIL Right -of -Way (approximately N.W. 1st Court) on the east, N.W. 5th Street on the south, and N.W. 2nd Avenue on the West. (See Attachment 1.) This area, which is approximately 30 percent vacant, is currently characterized by marginal residential development, non -conforming commercial activities and a vacant structure. The expansion of the project to include this area would entail the acquisition of 3.1 acres of land occupied by 48 housing units and 10 ..rrrrrri�i ATTACHiMENT 1 s•.r91ffik:eFitirrrr _. r i • 1 � i i •jj � • I r i • l i� i i l l S th - •. 1 1 1 - i . .� 1 I1 i • REDEVELOPMENT AREA Original Four -Block Area --Blocks 45N.;46N,55N, and 56N T:,ro-B1 ock Area --Blocks 65E and 65N 65 WIl �At1:71 ov t xrow" TWLAX srr s rAT140" • •i • 65 o.: lit s . REDEVELOPMENT AREA Gnaf c s,00 wo two (2) businesses. 'The estimated land acquisition relocation and demolition cost is $4,335,000. It is anticipated that acquisition of the additional two blocks could support the development of approximately 400,000 square feet of office space and 15,000 square feet of retail activity. This is a prime devel- opment site due to its central location between the Overtown Transit station and the Downtown Government Center. III. Project Implementation Schedule Several tasks necessary for the initiation of the actual land acquisition process have been completed to date. These include: Preparation and approval of the Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Plan; preparation of the development of the procedural guidelines for implementation of the Plan; initiation of the preparation of the land acquisition schedule; and authoriza- tion by the Board of County Commissioners to begin employing appraisers. The land acquisition schedule will be completed by February 1, 1983 and forwarded under separate cover. As the Milestone Schedule in Attachment 2 for the Overtown Urban Initiatives Project Indicates, the time frame for the remaining activities is twenty-two (22) months. The acquisition process is planned to begin in February, 1983 and be completed by August, 1984. Relocation is to begin in September, 1983 and be completed by September, 1984. Demolition and clearance will be accomplished between November, 1983 and November, 1984. Ydl I IBllllilllllllllllllllllllllllll III I II I � I I • ATTACHMENT 2 OVERTOYN UkBAN INITIATIVES PRUJECT MILESTUNE SCHEDULE Igil;' 19B3 1" ii4 U N U J I M A M J J A S U N U J M A M J J A 'L U N RESPUNSIBILITY TASK City o Miami, U Pie wdtion of Redevelopment Plan CML•L, BCC Aplowovdi of Redevelopilient Pldn Ctt of Midmi 1mdration of Initial Prospectus uCTA - Consultants Preiardtion of Black Equity Participation Plan it CMCC, BCC `Mr ovdl of Black Equity Pdrticipation Plan PMC, DAB, CMCC BCC Approval of Initial Prospectus City of Miami Initial Prospectus issued by City L.valuation of Responses to Initial Prospectus PMC OAB UCIIUU Preparation of Land Acquisition Plan Approval of Revised Acquisition Plan UCHUD + + UCHUD Pre ardtiun of Relocdtion Plan Appruval of Revised o lion Plan UCHUD Prrr oration of Revised Market Stud City of Miami Prepardtion of Project Marketing Documents Preparation of Minority ContrdLtinq Guidelines UCTA PMC, UAB, CMCC, BCC Approval of Minority Contracting Guidelines City of Miami Preparation of land Disposition Guidelines PCM, DAB, CMCC. BCC Approval of Project Marketing Documents Prepardtion of Prospectus I I IRE Cit of Miami PCM, OAD CMCC BCC Approval of Prospectus PMC, BCC Order Appraisals Land Acquisition Process - Nr otiations UCHUD DCHUD Land Acquisition Process - final Purchase Offer lend Ac ulsition Process - Condemnation UCHUD City of Miami City Issues Prospectus Responses to Prospectus - Developers Evaluated PMC Responses to PrusPectus - Preliminary PMC - City of Miami Discussions witti Developers DCHUD Relocation Proress- Residents UCHUD Relocation Process - Businesses Dti+uU Demolition UCHUD Clearance PMC, CAU Recolmiendation of developers CMCC selection of developers BCC Aooroval of selection of developers CMCC = City of Miami, City Commission BLC - Board of County CaImiSS wners PMC ■ Project Manoyenient Committee OAS - Overtown Advisory Board # 0 EXHIBIT B: TRANSIT SYSTEM OVERVIEW ♦y 4�l � r 7aQ w 0 EXHIBIT B Transit System and Urbanized Area Description The Transit System and Urbanized Area Description information submitted to UMTA in the Project No. FL-05-4072 grant application on March 6, 1979, as updated by additional material submitted in the application for FL-05-4110, November 4, 1981 and herein, accurately describes the transit system and urbanized area associated with this project and are herein incorporated by reference and made part of this application. The following material updates the Transit System and Urbanized Area Descriptive Information submitted on November 4, 1981. Section numbers and titles reference those in the first submission. A. Transit System Overview 3. Hours of Operation: Metrobus has routes in revenue service from 4:35 A.M. through 3:05 A.M. daily which include 5 mid -day only routes, 25 peak hour routes 34 routes operating 6 A.M. to after 12 A.M., 30 routes operating from 6 A.M. and ending between 6 P.M. and midnight, and 1 route operating from 7 A.M. to 6 P.M. 4. Institutional Characteristics: In FY 1980-81, a total of 73,171,995 passengers were carried by a Metrobus operating fleet of 669 buses, Metrobus was forced to increase fares in January, 1981 to a $.75 base fare and $1.00 for express service. Elderly, handicapped and student fares were increased to $.35 on July 1, 1981. The transfer charge was increased on August 1, 1982. Passengers must pay $.20 for the transfer when issued. Free Transfers - Transfers are free during off-peak hours (9:30 A.M. to 3:30 P.M.; except weekends and major holidays) to elderly, handicapped and students with Medicare or Metrobus identification cards. 5. Annual Ridership The following chart represents the total ridership for each fiscal year since 1971-72 and the percentage increase over the preceding year. Fiscal Year Total Ridership % Increase 1971-1912 54,674,811 2.7 1972-1973 56,691,307 3.7 1973-1974 60,793,654 7.2 1974-1975 61,130,412 0.6 1975-1976 63,409,368 3.7 1976-1977 64,270,282 1.4 1977-1978 65,806,008 2.4 1978-1979 67,520,214 2.6 1979-1980 76,588,662 13.4 1980-1981 73,171,995 (4.5);tij'��� 1981-1982 62,675,701 (14.3) 1982-1983 (projected) 63,000,000 5.17 (Projected) 6 Ridership has been increasing from FY 1972 to FY 1979 at an average rate of 3%. The 13.4% increase in passengers during FY 1979-1980, reflected the ridership gained during fiscal year 1979 due to fuel shortages and skyrocketing gasoline prices. Ridership for FY 1980-1981 was first projected to increase to 90,400,000 anual passengers. The ridership growth was expected due to fuel prices, sub- stantial population increases and the receipt of 260 Advance Design Buses. Fare increases and a reduction in transit services caused by budget cuts have caused a decline in ridership. The actual annual ridership for FY 1980-1981 totalled 73,171,995 passengers which constitutes a 4% decrease from the preceding year. Ridership during FY 1981-1982 was 62,675,701 annual passengers; a 14.3I decrease from the previous year. The increase in fares, elimination of free transfer and service cuts are the main reasons for the decline in ridership. A slight increase (5.17%) in ridership is anticipated for 1982-83. 6. Other Mass Transportation Carriers Metrobus is the mass transportation carrier in the Miami Urbanized area. The Broward County Transit Agency (BCTA) has four routes (one peak -hour express and three local routes operating between 6 A.M. and 7 P.M.) which serve northern Dade County. An agreement on transfer exchange and inter -county transfer points between Metrobus and BCTA became effective November 1, 1980. Passengers transferring from a Broward Transit route to a Metrobus local route are required to deposit the difference between Broward's base fare and Metrobus' base fare (25C). These passengers are not required to pay 20C with their Broward transfer. Conversely, passengers transferring from a Metrobus route to a Broward route will be required to pay 20c to Metrobus when the transfer is issued. Transferring between Metrobus and BCTA routes is permitted only at the following inter -county transfer points: 1) N.E. loth Avenue and 215th Street 2) West Dixie Highway and N.E. 215th Street 3) 163rd Street Shopping Center 4) Collins Avenue and 194th Street .; 5) Diplomate Mall, Hallandale 6) Young Circle, Hollywood 7) U.S. 441/N.W. 215th Street Elderly and Handicapped Programs Since 1972, the Dade County METROBUS system has maintained a reduced fare program for the elderly and handicapped. The RTS-2 kneeling buses are used on routes with heavy concentrations of elderly persons. The regular base fare for METROBUS patrons is 75C, with a 20C charge for transfers. Elderly and handicapped patrons with a Medicare card or a special I.D. card issued by METROBUS may ride during off-peak hours for a fare of 35C, with no charge for transfers. METROBUS carried more than 22,500,000 reduced fare patrons in Fiscal Year 1981. Metro -Dade County also sponsors the Special Transportation Services (STS), a shared - ride, curb -to -curb transportation service for handicapped and mobility -impaired persons who are unable to use METROBUS. Service is provided countywide by taxicabs and lift -equipped, for -hire vehicles, five days a week, from 6. a.m. to midnight. Patrons pay a inimum fare of $2.00 and a maximum fare of $5.00 per one-way trip, depending upon the length of the trip. Reservations are made by calling the F NX-f vation office on the business day before the patron wishes to travel. 10311 -13- 0 The STS Project is locally funded with a budget of $1.5 million for Fiscal Year 1982. As of January 1, 1982, approximately 55,000 persons were certi- fied eligible to use STS. During the first quarter of Fiscal Year 1982, 30,952 trips were made using STS at an approximate cost of $366,000. Dade County actively participates in the 16(b) (2) program each year by providing technical assistance to the Florida Department of Transportation's program for private non-profit agencies serving elderly and handicapped people. In an effort to increase the coordination between local social service agencies and the state, Dade County acts as a project coordinator for this program. 4y f 0 EXHIBIT C: PROJECT JUSTIFICATION o 0 EXHIBIT C: PROJECT JUSTIFICATION I. Increased Assessed Land Valuations The upJated land valuations for the original four -block area are necessary to make the Overtown Urban Initiatives project a reality. The first cost allocations for land acquisition were made in 1979 and reflect 1979 values. These allocations are now insufficient because of the time lapse of four years and because of activities in the area which have resulted in increased land values. Federal participation in the additional land acquisition costs should enable Dade County to complete the acquisition process according to the schedule presented in Exhibit A. Although, the Black Equity Participation Plan may cause some delays in the process, if fully endorsed and implemented, every effort will be made to ensure that this does not lead to unnecessary increases in project costs. II. Expansion of the Project Area Current Conditions The proposed additional acquisition site entails 2 city blocks bounded by N.W. 2nd Avenue on the west, Metrorail alignment on the east, N.W. 6th Street of the north and N.W. 5th Street on the south. The area is currently zoned for general commercial activities (warehousing, manufactoring). ` Block 65N, located between N.W. 1st Court and N.W. 2nd Avenue, is 90,000 square feet. It is presently occupied by a 67,000 square feet meat packing plant, a 15,000 square foot vacant commercial structure, 12 and 36 unit apartment structures, and a 22,500 square foot parking and loading area. The vacant and residential structures are in deteriorating condition. Block 65E comprise 45,000 square feet and is bounded by N.W. 1st Court and the Metrorail alignment. A 6,500 square foot vacant commercial structure and parking lots presently occupy the block. Benefits of Redevelopment in Additional Blocks The proposed inclusion of these two strategically located blocks will significantly enhance redevelopment opportunities within the project area. Currently, these two blocks, which are approximately 30% vacant, are composed of marginal residential development; non conforming commercial activities; and vacant structures, all of which act as impediments to redevelopment,'u""A. v; -15- V Proposed redevelopment within the project area is predicated upon its proximity to the emerging downtown Government Center and its location adjacent to the Overtown transit Station. Both of these factors have created a potential new market for residential and commercial development in this blighted area. The Downtown Government Center bounded by N.W. 5th Street, Flagler Street, I-95 and the F.E.C. ROW, which is currently under construction, will house the major governmental functions of Dade County, the City of Miami and the regional offices of the State of Florida. In addition, the Metro -Dade Cultural Center and three parking garages will be developed. When the Center is completed by the year 2000 over 2,869,000 square feet of office space and 2,301,000 square feet of ancillary development will be incorporated within the project. The Center presently houses 1,450 employees and which will be expanded to 7,150 by 1987 and to 17,320 by the year 2000. The proposed redevelopment of the two blocks will greatly enhance the physical and functional linkages between the Downtown Government Center and the Overtown Transit Station. The current overall blighted conditions of these two blocks will, unless removed, deter potential utilization of the Overtown Transit location by employees and visitors to the Downtown Government Center, which lies directly south of the proposed acquisition site. Of the estimated 8000 daily trips to and from the Overtown Transit Station in the year 2000, almost 50 percent are projected to be pedestrians. This sub- stantiates the need for improvements to the pedestrian environment in order to maximize station utilization. ti Development of the two blocks for office and retail use will generate additional employment within the area. Approximately 1260 jobs will be created by the proposed development of 400,000 square feet of retail space. The proposed development will also generate 1250 visitors per day. Due to its direct proximity to the Overtown Transit Station, the proposed development should contribute to increased patronage of the transit systems by both employees and visitors. The proposed redevelopment will augment the tax base of the City and County. Estimated development costs range between 25 and 30 million dollars. This represents a significant increase in the economic productivity of the land. Currently the meat packing plant is the only viable economic activity on the site. 813_`iD& 0 0 Blocks 65N and 65E were not included within the original proposal due to the more extreme levels of blight existing in the four blocks lying due west of the station and the assumption that private market forces would initiate re- development once the abutting properties were cleared. Preliminary indication from potential developers has supported the need to initiate the clearance of these two blocks in order to expedite the overall redevelopment process. The strengthening of the linkage between the project area and the Downtown Government Center is essential for the overall success of the project. The meat packing plant is a conflicting land use activity with the office, hotel, commercial and residential development proposed for the original 4 block project area. Truck traffic and refuse generated by this plant, which now create a nuisance to the abutting U.S. post office and state office building located within the Downtown Government Center, are indicative of this problem. The deteriorating condition of the 48 units of housing located on N.W. 2nd Avenue at N.W. 6th Street also creates an encumbrance to overall redevelopment of the project area. The inclusion of these 2 blocks within the redevelopment program will create a continous redevelopment area from Flagler Street to N.W. 8th and 9th Streets on the western periphery on the Miami CBD, directly linking the Downtown Govern- ment Center with the Overtown Transit station. Consistency With Local and Regional Planning The Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Plan was approved by the Miami City Commission on July 29, 1982 and by the Dade County•Commission on December 7, 1982. The Plan calls for major redevelopment activities within the area bounded by N.W. 5th Street on the south, I-395 on the north, I-95 on the west and Biscayne Boulevard on the east. (See Attachment 3.) The redevelopment proposed for blocks 65E and 65N is for office and retail development. This is consistent with land uses set forth in this application. The Southeast Overtown Park West Community Redevelopment Plan had extensive community involvement in preparation and review. An Ad Hoc Committee was established composed of community and civic leaders to assist in the plan preparation. This Plan was presented at public hearings before numerous city and county boards prior to city and county commission approval. -17- 0 0 Blocks 65N and 65E were not included within the original proposal due to the more extreme levels of blight existing in the four blocks lying due west of the station and the assumption that private market forces would initiate re- development once the abutting properties were cleared. Preliminary indication from potential developers has supported the need to initiate the clearance of these two blocks in order to expedite the overall redevelopment process. The strengthening of the linkage between the project area and the Downtown Government Center is essential for the overall success of the project. The meat packing plant is a conflicting land use activity with the office, hotel, commercial and residential development proposed for the original 4 block project area. Truck traffic and refuse generated by this plant, which now create a nuisance to the abutting U.S. post office and state office building located within the Downtown Government Center, are indicative of this problem. The deteriorating condition of the 48 units of housing located on N.W. 2nd Avenue at N.W. 6th Street also creates an encumbrance to overall redevelopment of the project area. The inclusion of these 2 blocks within the redevelopment program will create a continous redevelopment area from Flagler Street to N.W. 8th and 9th Streets on the western periphery on the Miami CBD, directly linking the Downtown Govern- ment Center with the Overtown Transit station. Consistency With Local and Regional Planning The Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Plan was approved by the Miami City Commission on July 29, 1982 and by the Dade County -Commission on December 7, 1982. The Plan calls for major redevelopment activities within the area bounded by N.W. 5th Street on the south, I-395 on the north, I-95 on the west and Biscayne Boulevard on the east. (See Attachment 3.) The redevelopment proposed for blocks 65E and 65N is for office and retail development. This is consistent with land uses set forth in this application. The Southeast Overtown Park West Community Redevelopment Plan had extensive community involvement in preparation and review. An Ad Hoc Committee was established composed of community and civic leaders to assist in the plan preparation. This Plan was presented at public hearings before numerous city ` and county boards prior to city and county commission approval. -- i 4-1 .L -17- ATTACHMENT 3 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN X W i M 0 Cz 1V. REDEVELOPMENT PLAN A. Lard Use Plan The land uses proposed under this Plan are generally in conformance with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1976 - 1986. Overtown Land use activities proposed for the Overtown portion of the Redevelopment Plan area is generally consistent with the Overtown Redevelopment Plan, 1979. The proposed land use from N.W. 6th Street to N.W. 8th Street is for high density residential and comm- ercial development. This development is pre- dicated upon its proximity to the Overtown Transit Station. Between N.W. 8th Street and N.W. 14th Street, the existing medium - density residential development pattern has been retained except east of N.W. 2nd Ave., south of N.W. loth St. Mixed use commercial/ residential development is proposed along portions of N.W. 2nd Avenue and N.W. 3rd Avenue. Overall, there will be a reduction in land designated for commercial use. Residential densities will be increased within the area adjacent to the station and along the proposed N.W. 1st Avenue Boulevard. Park West Project Area. Land uses proposed for the area are for high - density residential with supporting retail and service activities. Office development related to transit area corridors on both the eastern and western boundaries of Park West is proposed. Incentives will be provided for mixed use development throughout the area. Mandatory retail development will -19- ATTACHMENT 3 (Cant.) be required along the proposed 9th Street Central Mall. The proposed land use represents almost a total modification of the existing land use pattern. Other Areas Land use activities proposed for the remainder of the study area are for commercial use which will compliment proposed redevelopment activities. General commercial development is proposed north of llth Street and south of I-395 within the study.area and between N.W. 5th Street and N.W. Is 7th Street adjacent to the municipal railway. Land Use Categories (Note Map 4 for location) 1. - Mixed High -Density Residential/Community Commercial Future development is areas so designated shall be limited to structures appropriate for high density residential, hotel and commercial development. Mixed use develop- ment will be encouraged. A Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 4 is recommended. 2. - Milted High -Density Residential/Limited Commercial Development Future development in areas so designated shall be limited to structures appropriate for high density residential and limited commercial development. Commercial uses shall be permitted only in conjunction with residential development and commercial uses shall not exceed a permitted FAR of .5. A FAR of 3 is recommended. 3. - Mixed Moderate High -Density Residential/ Limited Commercial Development 14 Future development in areas so designated shall be limited to structures appropriate for moderate high -density residential and limited commercial development. Commercial uses shall be permitted only in conjuction with residential development and commercial uses shall not exceed a permitted FAR of .5. A FAR of 2 is recommended. 4. - Mixed Moderate -Nigh -Density Residential/ Mandatory Retail Development Future development in areas so designated shall be limited to structures appropriate for moderate high -density residential develop- ment only if development occurs in conjuction with first floor retail activity. Retail development will be permitted without residential development. Residential develop- ment permitted over retail shall not exceed 5 floors. 5. - Mixed Use. Medium -Density Residential/Local Commercial Future development in areas so designated shall be limited to structures appropriate for medium -density residential and local commercial activities as defined by the C-2 District of the Miami Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. Maximum residential densities will be restricted to 56 units per acre. 6. - Medium - density Residential Development Future development in areas so designated shall be limited to structures appropriate for residential development as defined by the R-4 District of the Miami Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. Maximum residential den- sities will be 56 units per acre. -20- ATTACHMENT 3 (Cont.) 7. - High -Density Central Commercial Developmerr Future development in areas so designated shall be limited to structures appropriate for high -density commercial development appropriate for the central business dis- trict. Uses permitted will be consistent with those defined by the C-3 District of the Miami Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. 8. - General Commercial Future development in areas so desig0ftd 'shall be limited to commercial development as defined by the C-4 District of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance which are compatible with residential development. 9. - Local Commercial Future development in areas so designated shall be limited to commercial development as defined by the C-2 District of the Wimi Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. Residenti development will be permitted only in conjuction with commercial development. 10. - Light Industrial Future development in areas so designated shall be limited to industrial activ. . s as defined by the I-1 District of th�'ij Miami Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance which are compatible with residential developmer 11. - Public Parking Future development in areas so designated shall be limited to public parking facili- ties. If such use is not developed, reusf will revert to adjacent designated land ui 12. - Parks and -.Open Space LAND USE MAP �•� s AND STATION AUGNMENT ON p MIXED RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL 1. HIGH DENSITY RES /COMMUNITY COMM. 2.HIGH DENSITY RES /LIMITED COMM 5.MODERATE -HIGH DENSITY RES/LIMITED COMM. 4. MANDATORY ATORYGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL/ TAIL 5. MEDIUM DENSITY RES./LOCAL COMM. mmm RESIDENTIAL 6. MEDIUM DENSITY -21- P� COMMERCIAL T. HIGH INTENSITY CENTRAL e. GENERAL COMMERCIAL 9. LOCAL m INDUSTRIAL 10 LIGHT ® PUOLIC SEMI PUBLIC 11, PARKING 12. PARKS,OPEN SPACE 15. INSTITUTIONAL MAP NO. 4 0 �l 0 200 Future development in areas so designated shall be limited to park and open space development as defined by the P-R District of the Miami Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. 13.- Public and Semi -Public (Institutional) Future development in areas so designated shall be limited to public and semi-public uses including churches, community facilities rw and governmental offices. 14.- Transit Future development in areas so designated shall be limited to uses related to the Dade County Rapid Transit System. 11 -22- ATTACHMENT 3 (Cont.) 0 0 The proposed development is also consistent with the Dade County Comprehensive Development Plan, which calls for development of activity centers adjacent to rapid transit stations, and the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1976-86. The expansion of the Overtown Urban Initiatives Project has been included in the Transportation Improvement Program and Annual Element for FY 1983. The resolution of the Transportation Planning Council to this effect appears in Attachment 4. -23- 0 ATTACHMENT 4 RESOLUTION TPC NO. A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING AMENDMENTS TO THE FY 1983 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AS REQUESTED BY THE DADE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Planning Organization established the Transportation Planning Council, charging it with evaluating the technical adequacy of the transportation planning and programming process and advising the Governing Borad on transportation policies and decisions, and WHEREAS, in performance of the aforesaid duties, and responsibilities, this Council has reviewed and evaluated a request from the Dade County Transportation Administration that amendments be made to the Fiscal Year 1983-1987 Transportation Improvement Program, and WHEREAS, it is the judgement of this Council that the requested amendments are necessary, appropriate and merit a recommendation that said amendments be approved by the Governing Board. NOW, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING COUNCIL OF THE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION OF THE MIAMI URBANIZED AREA: That the amendments to the Fiscal Year 1983 Transportation Improvement Program requested by the Dade County Transportation Administration as set forth in the attachment (made a part herewith), are hereby endorsed by the Council as necessary and appropriate and are recommended to the Governing Board for its approval. The foregoing resolution was offered by who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by and upon being put to a vote was as follows: -24- M 0 ATTACHMENT 4 (Cont.) Warren J. Higgins Richard H. Judy Sylvia Morris King Carmen Lunetta Humberto Martinez Henry E. Pelt M. Barry Peterson William M. Powell Don Stuart Reginald R. Walters Douglas Yoder Leslie A. Brook The Chairman declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this loth day of January, 1983. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING COUNCIL M. P. 0. BY: C. William Ockert MPO Secretariat .; y C L.),*%. .' DATE OF ACT' c - or-- MIAMI URBANIZED AREA TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - AMENDMENTS ----- ---- rte„ U.ji TiNTpT1YE PROGRAM MMOS[s OF DOLLARS rv+oNsCO"ra"M w110. •;�tsto PROJECT OESCRIPTIO[I TYPE WORK (IN THOUSANDS — w4 1aR a5 iae5 �6 �a -a 7 SovRtt n.N t't t • . Q, TaiQ_Ni ia�3 UHTA r F- -- 5ec.3 Yes Add ' Capital Urban initiatives- Douglas Rd.1 Land Acquisition, Demolition, 12,000 Dade o. City f Overtown, Northside, Allapattah Relocation ttiami REMARKS-7 -- - U14TA :Add - Pedestrian Overpasses Design, Constructi n Sec.3 ` Capital At Rapid Transit Inspection Dade to. Stations State REMARKS REMARKS 1 • �t G DATE OF AGT' r P:.cE__flF.� MIAMI ()RHANIZEQ AREA TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM — AMENDMENTS tENTAtEYE PROGRAM ^w.wn (IN THOUSANDS 0� OOLIARS 1 rU.0 sou.ccPROJECT co"rorlw •')urs to DESCRIPTIONve EEOF WORK _ e4 �oe4_�S 1oe5 e6 is -�l Raw ,.•,w ¢. - U11TA Sec.3 Yes Add ' Capital Urban Initiatives- Land Acquisition, Dade o.Demolition, Overtown, Douglas Rd. 12,ODD City f Northside, Allapattah Relocation Miami REMARKS UMTA : Ad<t' Pedestrian Overpasses Design, Constructi n Sec.3 Capital At Rapid Transit Inspection Dade Co. Stations State REMARKS REMARKS , / . to N 1 0 0 0 EXHIBIT D: PROJECT FINA^JCING • i 8Li"it. 10S• 0 0 EX::IBIT I: LABOR, C EXHIBIT I: LABOR The U.S. Department of Labor, by the attached letter dated August 18, 1981, certified that the terms and conditions of the 13(c) agreement pursuant to capital grant projects, dated May 11, 1979 were applicable to FL-03-0064. A copy of this draft application for an amendment to FL-03-0064 has been forwarded to the Transport Workers Union Local 291 requesting that the May 11, 1979 agreement again be used to cover the subject application. W'4.11 V--10 C:""' � F; q. • "�.J 0 ATTACHMENT 5 4 U.S. Department of Labor Lai _ 'c �.ce:. �m•..:stra:, Mr. Carl Riuhard::;on Regional Administrator Urban Mass Transportation Adm:in?.:;::ration Revs on IV Sul te 400 1720 Peachtree Road, N.W. Atlanta, Georgia 30309 Re: UMTA Applica.t:"Loa Metropolitan Dade County Miami, Flo;:id Overtown Urban Initiatives (FL-03-0064 ) Dear "fir. Richardson: This is in reply to the request from your office that we review the above captioned application for a grant under the Urban Mass Transportation Act of 1964, as amended. In connection with a previous grotic application, tl- :� Transport: Workers Union and Metropolitan Dade County executed an agreement dated May 11, 1979, which provided to the members of the union protections satisfying the requirements of Section 13(c) of the Act. . The parties have agreed that thf^ terms and conditions of the agree-- ment. dated May 11, 1979, shall br: made applicable to the .instant project. •: Accordingly, the Department of Labor makes the certification xe^,stir^1 in the Act with respect to the i.rm,tant project on condition that: 1. The t�srms and conclitlull•; o': the agrcc-,--�nV. dated Ntuy 11, 1979, -, !-;i LJ. be made appJ i cable to the instant project and made par:: of the contract of by refer-:- car 2. The term "project" as u^e:1 in the agreF•rnf,nt: of May 11, 1979, shelf l)e deemed to c:c •.::r. aril refer to the instant project; and 1. -29- .-. 83-.11108: 0 0 ATTACHMENT 5 (Cont.) Employees of urban mat:; tranuportatior. in the service area oL the project, other •Char, tho:ce repr.Eccritrd by the un i.on, shall h - substantially the same level:; of protect-Jo,i as are afforded to union members under the Mc•.y 11, 1979 agreement and this certification. Sincerely, John R. Stepp Director, Office of Labor-Managcment Relations Theodore Munter/MTA Alan Wulkan/MDC ✓ Malcolm Goldstein/TWU Ser.viccu -3( • j EXHIBIT J: PUBLIC HEARING ON 61s-10s; EXHIBIT K: RELOCATION F*3--.Q19: EXHIBIT K: RELOCATION The expansion of the Overtown Urban Initiatives Project to the two blocks south and southwest of the transit station requires the acqui- sition of 3.1 acres of land. There are 48 occupied houseing units and 2 businesses located on this property. The available housing resources within or near Overtown are described in the Final Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to Overtown Station Area Redevelopment, which is incorporated herein by reference. The relocation assistance described in the EIS for displaced persons will be afforded those in the additional two blocks, as well as those affected in the original project area. -32- �,-1RIP �saw...nw+..w.:r, r,.una.-:c.:r�a.ratiiuncarra.4Tafi:.. +�'ih'<7y,;fy,...Sr�'g1W ♦ -t�':Y 3 4 r^•.^T.^ 7 EXHIBIT L: PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT • w.:raar... i..oe...m vw.v.w.a;.ux�...s+u::ay.�'s<w3Fv�+.-t..:,i.K: y2:ti 5" .�7 ib',.°r`, �' � d`1 .+'. .........;.. , . .. ,� '.- ... ... .. '. . ... ;. .- ... EXHIBIT L: PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT In accordance with Federal requirements, a Final Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the original four block project area was made available on March 19, 1982 and is incorporated herein by reference. A finding of no significant impact has been requested pursuant to the additional two -block area. -33- z,: ta�-.>..u�na.�».......,.,..,...,:...:.:�rsu..•.:.v..:.�es�uax +tt�-JEi?�� J"'y. :"ev ra . c.,ra s� .„ ,... ..:. ., i .. ____—__. _. _.. __._.._. _ _ _._.. ul 0 PART V ASSURANCES FOR CAPITAL GRANT PROJECTS •; IA OF,t AUTHORIZING R?SOLL?TION OPINION OF COUNSEL (Will be forwarded under separate Cover) 63--108: i e l.i Y 311