HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-83-0212J-83-231
rr -, � �•
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF
A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR A SPECIALTY
SHOPPING CENTER TO BE LOCATED ON
APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES SURROUNDING AND
ADJACENT TO MIAMARINA TO BE KNOWN AS
BAYSIDE; SELECTING A CERTIFIED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM AND ESTABLISHING A REVIEW
COMMITTEE AND APPOINTING MEMBERS THERETO
TO EVALUATE PROPOSALS AND MAKE
RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY MANAGER, AS
REQUIRED BY CITY OF MIAMI CHARTER
AMENDMENT PROVIDING COMPREHENSIVE
PROCUREMENT PROCEDURES APPROVED BY
REFERENDUM, NOVEMBER 2, 1982.
WHEREAS, a comprehensive procurement procedures
ordinance was submitted to referendum and passed on
November 2, 1982, amending the Charter of the City of Miami;
and
WHEREAS, said Charter Amendment allows for "unified
development projects" where an interest in real property is
owned or is to be acquired by the City and is to be used for
the development of improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission determined on January 13,
1983 that for the development of a special shopping center on
approximately 20 acres* of City -owned land surrounding and
adjacent to Miamarina it is advantageous for the City to
procure from a private person one or more of the following
integrated packages comprising a unified development project:
- Planning and design, construction and
leasing; or
- Planning and design, leasing and management;
or
- Planning and design, construction and
management; or
- Planning and design, construction, leasing
and management; and
------------------------------------------------------------
*Subsequent to adoption of Resolution No. 83-17 on
January 13, 1983, the geographic area of the herein Project
was increased from 15 acres to 20 acres through adoption of
Resolution No. 83-211 on March 18, 1983.
CITY COMMISSION
MEETING OF
MAR 18 1983
" Ito. S, 3 ".'2-tom h_
WHEREAS, said specialty center shall include restaurants
and food services, specialty retail shops, entertainment
facilities, public purpose facilities, parking, access and
service facilities; and
WHEREAS, said Charter Amendment requires that the City
Commission hold a public hearing to consider the contents of
the request for unified development project proposals; and
WHEREAS, said Charter Amendment further requires that at
the conclusion of the public hearing the City Commission
authorize the issuance of a Request For Proposals, select a
certified public accounting firm and appoint the members of a
review commttee from persons recommended by the City Manager;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The City Manager is hereby authorized to
issue a Request For Proposals in substantially the form
attached for a specialty shopping center to be located on
approximately 20 acresl surrounding and adjacent to Miamarina
to be known as Bayside.
Section 2.a. The certified public accounting firm of
Coopers & Lybrand is hereby selected to evaluate the
Proposals and report to the City Manager.
b. If the City Manager cannot negotiate an
agreement which, in his opinion, is fair, competitive and
reasonable, with Coopers & Lybrand; then he is hereby
authorized to terminate such negotiations and to proceed to
negotiate with Touche Ross & Co. and the latter firm shall
be authorized as the City Commission's selection.
c. If the City Manager cannot negotiate an
agreement which, in his opinion, is fair, competitive and
reasonable, with Touche Ross & Co.; then he is hereby
1 Subsequent to adoption of Resolution No. 83-17 on January 13,
1983, the geographic area of the herein Project was increased
from 15 acres to 20 acres through adoption of Resolution No.
83-211 on March 18, 1983.
-2-
63- 1ti-
authorized to terminate such negotiations and to proceed to
negotiate with Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. and the latter
firm shall be authorized as the City Commission's selection.
Section 3. A review committee is hereby established to
evaluate the Proposals and make recommendations to the City
Manager, as required by the City of Miami Charter Amendment
providing comprehensive procurement procedures approved by
referendum, November 2, 1982
Section 4. The following individuals are hereby
appointed to the proposed review committee:
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC
a. Committee Chairman: David Weaver
b. David Blumberg
c. Tina Hills
d. T. Willard Fair
e. Herbert Leeds
f. Dan Paul
CITY OF MIAMI OFFICIALS
a. Roger Carlton
b. Carlos Garcia
c. Roy Kenzie
d. Adrianne Macbeth
e. Jim Reid
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18 day of MARCH , 1983.
MAURICE A. FERRE
MAURICE A. FERRE
M A Y O R
ATTEST:
RALPjVG. ONGIE, CITY CLE
-3-
83_.,1„
0
\J
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
ROBERT F. CLARK`
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS:
2 IA,, �' V, Me� � - _
E R. GARCIA-PEDROSA
ITY ATTORNEY
-4-
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
CITY OF MIAMI
BAYSIDE SPECIALTY CENTER
MARCH 1983
MAURICE FERRE, Mayor
J.L. PLUMMER, Vice Mayor
JOE CAROLLO, Commissioner
MILLER DAWKINS, Commissioner
DEMETRIO PEREZ, Commissioner
HOWARD V. GARY, City Manager
Proposals Due: 2:00 p.m. August I, 1983
Jim Reid, Assistant City Manager
3500 Pan American Drive
Miami, Florida 33133
83-02i2
4
0
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cover Letter Page
I Public Notice I
11 Proposal Overview 2
Summary 2
Proposal Format and Legal Requirements 3
Proposer's Development Plan 7
Estimated Construction Cost 9
Proposer's Method of Operation 9
Proposer's Method of Financing Development 9
Additional Requirements 9
Evaluation Criteria 10
Financing Strategy 12
Schedule 13
III Facility Requirements and Design Criteria 14
The Site 14
Historic and Physical Environment 16
Public Spaces 17
Existing Restaurant Facilities 17
Existing Municipal Auditorium 17
Additional Facilities 17
IV Operational Requirements 18
Management 18
Advertising and Promotion 18
Equal Opportunity, Minority Employment and Business
Utilization Requirements 18
V Declaration 19
VI Financial Disclosure and Professional Information 20
VII General Contract Terms 35
APPENDICES
A. Demographics and Tourism
B. Downtown Miami Economic Impact
C. Regional and Site Maps
D. Existing Restaurant Plans and Description
E. Existing Auditorium Plans and Description
F. Bayfront Park Redevelopment Plans and Description
G. Port of Miami Master Plan
H. Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Plan
I. Survey and Legal Description
J. Enabling and Pertinent Legislation
K. Grand Prix Race Course
83--2012
0 0
PUBLIC NOTICE
The CITY OF MIAMI is inviting interested parties to submit unified
development project proposals for the planning and design, construction,
financing and management of a waterfront specialty center, to be known as
BAYSIDE, under a long term lease agreement with the City of Wami.
BAYSIDE is expected to provide up to 200,000 square feet of new
commercial and public space. The site presently incorporates a 42,000
square foot municipal auditorium facility, a 550 seat restaurant, 780 parking
spaces and service facilities and is adjacent to and surrounds a 208 slip
municipal marina.
Proposals will be received by the Ralph G. Ongie, City Clerk, City Hall,
3500 Pan American Drive, P.O. Box 330708, Miami, Florida 33133 no later
than 2:00 PM on August I, 1983 and will be publically opened on that day.
Applicants will demonstrate knowledge and experience in the area covered
by their proposal.
All proposals shall be submitted in accordance with the Request for
Proposals documents which may be obtained from the City Clerk of the City
of Miami. These documents contain detailed and specific information
regarding the property being offered for lease and the City's goals for the
use of the property by the successful proposer.
The City of Miami reserves the right to accept any proposal deemed to be in
the best interest of the City, to waive any irregularities in any proposal or
to reject any or all proposals and to re -advertise for new proposals. In
making such determination, the City's consideration shall include, but not be
limited to the proposer's experience, the dollar amount return offered to the
City, the proposer's financial qualifications, the professional reputation of
the proposer, and the evaluation by the City of all proposals submitted in
support or explanation of their proposed use and development of the
property.
Howard V. Gary
City Manager
`'3-212
4 0
II PROPOSAL OVERVIEW
SUMMARY
The City of Miami is extending invitations to qualified developers/lessees to
submit bid proposals for the development of a specialty center to be known
as Bayside on a City owned waterfront land parcel which includes a marina
and restaurant known as Miamarina and the City of Miami Bayfront
Auditorium. Bayside is to be designed, built and operated by the successful
proposer under a long term lease agreement with the City.
The property encompasses approximately twenty acres within the downtown
Miami Bayfront Park system including a 50,000 square feet restaurant
facility currently operating with a 550 seat capacity, a 42,000 square foot
municipal auditorium, 780 parking spaces and surrounding and adjacent to a
208 ship quality visitor marina.
Located mid -point in the 100+ acre park system, the site lies between
Biscayne Bay to the east and Biscayne Boulevard, the showcase boulevard of
downtown Miami to the west. A portion of the north is bounded by Port
Boulevard, the entrance to the Port of Miami, the world's busiest cruise port
terminal with nearly 1.6 million passengers annually and Miami's expanding
industrial terminal. Immediately to the south the City is currently
implementing an 28 acre park improvement project designed by sculptor
Isamu Noguchi. The $20 million Bayfront Park redevelopment includes
outdoor performing arts facilities, several significant sculptures and
fountains, children play equipment, a bayside prominade, park concessions
and as well incorporates a treasure of existing specimen landscape. The
initial phase seawall replacement, rip rap placement, baywalk, fountain and
water taxi piers is scheduled to begin construction in mid summer. Other
aspects of the park reconstruction will be implemented over the next several
years.
The site enjoys access from Biscayne Boulevard which is also US I and Port
Boulevard both of which link directly to Interstate 1-95 and the SR-836
Airport Expressway, the areas major arterials. Additionally, the site lies
adjacent to the Bayfront Park Station of a Downtown People Mover System
currently being implemented. The People Mover will link all areas of
downtown to the new Metrorail Area Rapid Transit, a one billion dollar
commuter transportation system currently under construction and scheduled
to be operational in 1985.
The City is seeking a new building development that will create the most
active and productive use of this premier site. The project will include
restaurants, fast-food services, retail boutiques, markets and entertainment
areas responsive to the urban, environmental and design factors inherent to
the Miami waterfront and the Bayfront Park systern. As an urban specialty
center, the facility is expected to provide as much as 200,000 square feet of
commercial and public space exclusive of the existing 50,000 square foot
restaurant presently on the site. Parking and all facilities ancillary to the
specialty center would be expected to be on -site. The 42,000 square foot
municipal auditorium within the site will be made available to the project
for either rehabilitation or demolition and reuse. Special events and ongoing
use of both the waterfront site and Bayfront Park will stress live
-2- 8• ,�� 12
4 &
entertainment and cultural activities. The combined developments intend to
promote a focal point for community participation from the entire region.
The Bayside waterfront complex should be designed to attract all segments
of the two million resident community as well as South Florida visitors, a
market currently in excess of twelve million annually.
Proposals shall include and will be evaluated on the proposed development
program, project definition, site plan and design concept, financing strategy,
feasibility and potential return to the City.
The City places great emphasis on the uniqueness of design quality and
functional interrelationship of planned uses in the development of the
Bayside complex. Therefore, the City will carefully study the qualifications
and past performance of the developer, and its architects and other design
consultants. It will review and evaluate their past projects to determine
their ability to carry out and meet the City's expectations.
PROPOSAL FORMAT AND LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
The City of Miami Charter was amended by referendum vote on November
2, 1982, providing comprehensive procurement procedures. The following
portion of the adopted ordinance is applicable to the unified development
project proposals being sought by the City in this request for proposals:
"UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS.
Definition
Unified development project shall mean a project where an interest in
real property is owned or is to be acquired by the city, and is to be used
for the development of improvements, and where the commission
determines that for the development of said improvements it is most
advantageous to the city that the city procure from a private person, as
defined in the Code of the City of Miami, one or more of the following
integrated packages:
(i) planning and design, construction, and leasing; or
(ii) planning and design, leasing, and management; or
(iii) planning and design, construction, and management; or
(iv) planning and design, construction, leasing and management.
So long as the person from which the city procures one of the above
mentioned integrated packages provides all of the functions listed for
that package, such person need not provide each listed function for the
entire unified development project nor for the same part of the unified
development project.
Requirements of Requests for Proposals
Requests for proposals for unified development projects shall generally
define the nature of the uses the city is seeking for the unified develop-
ment project and the estimated allocations of land for each use. They
-3- 8 3- 0.12
shall also state the following:
(i) The specific parcel of land contemplated to be used or the
geographic area the city desires to develop pursuant to the unified
development project.
0i) The specific evaluation criteria to be used by the below -mentioned
certified public accounting firm.
(iii) The specific evaluation criteria to be used by the below -mentioned
review committee.
(iv) The extent of the city's proposed commitment of funds, property,
and services.
(v) The definitions of the terms "substantial increase" and "material
alteration" that will apply to the project pursuant to subsection
WOO hereof.
(vi) A reservation of the right to reject all proposals and of the right of
termination referred to in sub -section (e)(iv), below.
Issuance of Request for Proposals; Selection of CPA Firm: A 2ointment
o eview ommittee
After public notice there shall be a public hearing at which the
commission shall consider:
(i) The contents of the request for proposals for the subject unified
development project;
00 The selection of a certified public accounting firm, which shall
include at least one member with previous experience in the type
of development in question;
(iii) The recommendations of the City Manager for the appointment of
persons to serve on the review committee. Said review committee
shall consist of an appropriate number of city officials or
employees and an equal number plus one of members of the public,
whose names shall be submitted by the City Manager no fewer than
five days prior to the above -mentioned public hearing.
At the conclusion of the public hearing the commission shall authorize
the issuance of a request for proposals, select a certified public
accounting firm, and appoint the members of the review committee only
from among the persons recommended by the City Manager.
Procedure for Selection of Proposal
The procedure for the selection of an integrated package proposal shall
be as follows:
(i) All proposals shall be analyzed by a certified public accounting
firm appointed by the commission based only on the evaluation
C'i 3 �"!.r 1 �.
-4-
A
criteria applicable to said certified public accounting firm con-
tained in the request for proposals. Said certified public
accounting firm shall render a written report of its findings to the
City hAanager.
(ii) The review committee shall evaluate each proposal based only on
the evaluation criteria applicable to said review committee
contained in the request for proposals. Said review committee
shall render a written report to the City Manager of its evaluation
of each proposal, including any minority opinions.
(iii) Taking into consideration the findings of the aforementioned
certified public accounting firm and the evaluations of the
aforementioned review committee, the City Manager shall recom-
mend one or more of the prrposals for acceptance by the
commission, or alternatively, the City Manager may recommend
that all proposals be rejected. If there are three or more proposals
and the City Manager recommends only one, or if he recommends
rejection of all proposals, the City Manager shall state in writing
the reasons for his recommendation.
In transmitting his recommendation or recommendations to the
commission, the City Manager shall include the written reports,
including any minority opinions, rendered to him by the aforemen-
tioned certified accounting firm and review committee.
(iv) All contracts for unified development projects shall be awarded to
the person whose proposal is most advantageous to the city, as
determined by the commission.
The commission may accept any recommendation of the City
Manager by an affirmative vote of a majority of its members. In
the event the commission does not accept a proposal recommended
by the City Manager or does not reject all proposals, the
commission shall seek recommendations directly from the afore-
mentioned reveiw committee, which shall make a recommendation
or recommendations to the commission taking into account the
report of the aforementioned certified public accounting firm and
the evaluation criteria specified for the review committee in the
request for proposals.
After receiving the direct recommendations of the review commit-
tee, the commission shall by an affirmative vote of a majority of
its members:
1) Accept any recommendation of the review committee; or
2) Accept any previous recommendation of the City Manager; or
3) Reject all proposals.
-5-
"�'3--'012
Execution of Controcts
All contracts for unified development projects shall be signed by the City
Manager or his designee after approval thereof by the commission. The
provisions of this charter section shall supersede any other charter or
code provision to the contrary."
The Bayside Specialty Center request for proposals seeks an integrated
development package including planning and design, construction, financing,
leasing and management of up to 200,000 square feet of new structures,
including restaurants and fast food services, retail shops, entertainment
facilities and public space. New structures shall be limited to a maximum
height not to exceed that of the existing Reflections on the Bay restaurant
(50 feet above grade, 57 feet above mean water level). Additionally, all new
structures shall recognize the view corridor requirements set by City
Charter. The aforementioned ordinance includes the further language that
"The City shall lease to or contract with private firms or persons for the
commercial use or management of any of the City's waterfront property
only on condition that: the terms of said contract allow reasonable public
access to the water, reasonable public use of such property and comply with
other charter waterfront setbacks and view corridor requirements. City
Ordinances require that I117 percent of construction funds, when public funds
are used, be set aside for "art in public places'! This applies to the extent
that Federal, City or Offstreet Parking Authority funds are used for
construction as the public contribution to Bayside. Proposals are required to
include V2 of I percent of construction funds be set aside for the some
purpose, art in public places'as defined in City Ordinances. Specific charter
sections and City Ordinances which apply and are pertinent to the Bayside
project are included in Appendix J. Ground level access to valet parking and
service for the existing Reflections on the Bay restaurant shall be
maintained as well as marina parking and access. Existing site conditions
incorporated in the lease agreement with Restaurant Associates for
Reflections on the Bay and in the management agreement with New World
Marinas, Inc. for the operation of the marina shall be maintained on site
either as existing or by an alternative plan acceptable to the City,
Restaurant Associates and/or New World Marinas.
The request for proposals shall additionally allow the proposers the option to
renovate and incorporate the existing Bayfront Municipal Auditorium for the
same uses, i.e. - restaurant and food services, specialty retail shops and
entertainment facilities, plus any public purpose use that would be
compatible with the total Bayside facility. A second option would be to
demolish the auditorium and use that portion of the site for new structures,
incorporating the some proposed specialty center uses, or for parking. A
third option is to not include the Auditorium in the proposed development.
In addition to the 203 parking spaces now provided on site for Reflections on
the Bay and the marina, the Miami Off -Street Parking Authority now
maintains 577 metered parking spaces on the site. The project shall
continue to provide at a minimum, the same number of spaces on Site A
and/or Site B as depicted on the accompanying site plan immediately
following this section. All parking spaces provided on either or both Site A
and Site B shall be operated by the Miami Off -Street Parking Authority. If
the proposers includes constructing or financing construction of any part of
fhe parking requirements, the proposer will be required to negotiate and
-6- 83'-I'Z'012
enter into a separate management agreement with the Off -Street Parking
Authority subject to the approval of the City.
Additional uses of the site shall be limited to access, parking facilities and
infrastructure requirements for the project.
Site A, the available land parcel for the Bayside facilities, of approximately
twenty acres is defined on the accompanying site plan illustrating the
boundaries. The site includes a portion of existing Bayfront Park land (Area
A-3). It is, however, not intended to be a net land area loss to Bayfront Park
because of a 2.06 acre new land fill at the northeast portion of the park
adjacent to the proposed development. Proposed structures upon which the
lease agreement will be based shall not exceed a land area of 2.06 acres
within Bayfront Park.
The City and/or the Miami Off -Street Parking Authority would propose to
make available up to $8,000,000 from tax exempt bonds and/or seek a
Federal Urban Development Action Grant for preparation of the site by
providing infrastructure and public facilities including but not limited to
vehicular and pedestrian access and service roads, parking facilities up to
500 spaces, sanitary sewer, site utilities and Bayfront Park amphitheatre
support facilities, proposals which include building within the bermed edge
of the amphitheatre are required to allocate space for the amphitheatre
support facilities within the bermed area and occessi�le to the amphitheatre
stage.
Service such as police and fire protection, equal to those provided any
private development within the City of Miami, shall be provided by the City.
All additional security, etc., shall be the responsibility of the developer.
The developer will be expected to pay municipal taxes on all improvements.
As per Item (E) (IV) of the Charter Procurement Ordinance Section on
Unified Development Projects "substantial increase" or "material alteration"
will be defined as a 10% increase to the City's proposed commitment of
funds, property and/or services.
The City and/or the Miami Off -Street Parking Authority would expect to
derive debt service coverage and potential profit from the operation of the
public facilities constructed with bond revenues and the lease payments
derived from a ground lease agreement with the successful proposer.
Proposals are required to state a minimurn guarantee and a percentage of
gross revenues as lease payment.
PROPOSER'S DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Describe your plans for development of the Bayside facilities including the
number of buildings and their uses, square footage, heights, etc., architec-
tural features, methods of construction, number of retail entities, restaurant
seats, etc., and porking requirements (by development phase, if more than
one phase is proposed). Special features or attractions and architectural
character should be precisely described.
Schematic drawings by on architect licensed to do business in the State of
Florida illustrating the proposed development is required. Schematic
drawings shall include basic site and building relationship plans at 1/16"
-7 -
8 3--ti 12
BAYSIDE SPECIAL* CENTER
SITE BOUNDARIES •.— — -----
`. 1 i [ G RiY,.pA01RiCRS
A r e a B
,uaeo,RRR,iwwa L a
y C
AUDITORIUMl�
0
I�
{LL,
• C
R t
M i �
O i!
7
MIAMARINA
NISCAVME RAT
�,q ",
Area AU rea � 1
�` � ! MttIRR,'t Ii,RMt
7
CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
f e :♦1tr.
i
RAVE RONT PARK _ .`
u*. p.t .aRa rwanr•t .wor,RRr e`
i �
{ Area A5
11 Area'
i : III it _ _
8
t131— 012
to 0
scale and diagrammatic sections and elevations showing vertical relation-
ships also at 1 / 16" scale. The presentation should also include a black and
white aerial perspective or isonometric sketch. All schematic presentation
drawings should be board mounted for the convenience of City review.
Your development plan description should include information on how
construction will be contracted, i.e., proposer acting as contractor or
proposer contracting with a general contractor or construction manager. If
a general contractor or construction manager will be involved, then the
applicable pages of the Proposer's Questionnaire included in Section VII must
be completed by the general contractor or construction manager. The City
will also welcome any concept plans, architectural drawings, or model the
proposer may wish to submit in addition to its development plan description
and the required schematic drawings.
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST
Furnish a construction cost estimate by use (i.e, restaurants, shops, parking
areas, landscaped areas, etc.) for the entire proposed complex. Also, include
as separate items the estimated cost of furnishings, fixtures and equipment.
If the development will be constructed in phases, the costs for each phase
should be shown separately. Include a schedule of approximate dates that
each significant improvement is expected to be completed.
PROPOSER'S METHOD OF OPERATION
Describe your operation of the entire proposed complex. Your description
should include an organization chart; job descriptions of key positions; brief
outline of operating procedures; how and where the complex will be
advertised; indication of which businesses you intend to operate and which
businesses you intend to sublease or have operated under a management
contract. Discuss any operational services and uses which you will seek
permission to provide. If independent management services is to be
involved, then the applicable pages of the Proposer's Questionnaire included
in Section VII of this document must be completed by the management
contractor.
PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING DEVELOPMENT
Describe how development of all aspects of the Boyside Specialty Center
shall be financed (include the amount of equity capital, amount of interim
financing, amount of permanent financing, source of equity institutions,
preliminary letters of commitment, etc.).
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
In addition, to be considered complete, proposals must include the following:
Financial disclosure and Professional Information as detailed in Section
VII of this document.
A market analysis justifying proposed restaurant, fast food service, retail
and entertainment mix, parking and access service requirements and
including a pro -forma statement of anticipated project income and
expenses projected for 10 years.
in
0 •
A response to all aspects of the General Contract Terms as detailed in
Section Vlll of this document including the dollar amounts for minimum
annual payments to the City and a schedule of the percentages of gross
receipts to be paid to the City over the duration of the proposed lease
term.
A schedule including all steps of planning and design, construction and
operation including any proposed future expansion anticipated.
Letters from financial institutions documenting the proposer's ability to
finance the proposed development.
Letters indicating the proposer's ability to obtain required bonds and
insurance.
Letters documenting the proposer's past experience in related develop-
ment and management.
Resumes of key individuals to be involved and documentation of minority
participation.
The proposers are expected to maize all disclosures and declarations as
requested and to deliver along with the proposal a cashier's check for
$20,000 which shall be non-refundable to the successful proposer.
EVALUATION CRITERIA
Review procedures and the selection process are set by City Charter as
detailed in the ordinance previously included in this document.
The City of Miami Commission consisting of 5 elected officials, including
the Mayor, will name the successful proposer based on recommendation of
the City Manager.
At a public hearing held March 18, 1983, the City Commission authorized
the City Manager to issue this Request for Proposals and at that same
hearing appointed an eleven member review committee from recommenda-
tions submitted by the City Manager and further selected a Certified Public
Accounting firm both to evaluate submitted proposals.
The review committee established by the City Commission at the public
hearing will make recomrnendations to the City Manager regarding pro-
posers' qualifications and experience.
The specific evaluation criteria to be used by the Review Committee
follows:
1. Experience of the development team, including specific
experience on similar projects ......................... 25%
2. Financial capability, level of financial commitment and
anticipated financial return to the City .................. 25%
3. Overall project design ............................... 25%
-10-
83-- :12
ri
4. Project management plan ............................ 15%
5. Extent of minority participation (Latin/Black) ............. 10
The following evaluation factors are illustrative, primarily to provide
guidance to the Review Committee and proposers:
I. THE EXPERIEI',iCE OF THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM, INCLUDING SPECI-
FIC EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR DEVELOPMENTS
- Assess qualifications and experience of project leaders, team
members and consultants.
- Evaluate specific experience of development team in relationship
to work on specialty centers or mixed use/activity center type of
projects, etc.
2. FINANCIAL CAPABILITY, LEVEL OF FINANCIAL COMMITMENT AND
ANTICIPATED FINANCIAL RETURN TO THE CITY
- Assess the financial capability of the team, including the equity
commitment, financing strategy, access to construction financing
and proposed return to the City, including minimum guarantees and
share of gross sales, etc.
3. OVERALL PROJECT DESIGN
- Assess the innovative and imaginative siting of facilities.
- Resolution of access and service.
- Aesthetic qualities and compatibility of design with waterfront and
park setting.
- Innovative and imaginative design features.
- Security, energy efficiency, accessibility for the handicapped,
imaginative and creative use of graphics, fighting, landscaping,
water features, public spaces and pedestrian areas.
4. PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN
- Assess quality and organization of management team, marketing
strategy for space, consumer sales and attracting tourists, tenant
mix, including rationale for specific food programs; methods of
providing maintenance, food supply handling and storage methods
and special security arrangements, etc.
5. EXTENT OF MINORITY PARTICIPATION (LATIN AND BLACK)
- Assess participation of design development team and equity
participation.
- Assess hiring during the construction phase.
-11-
83-- 412
`J
Assess special business development opportunities for minorities
and hiring outreach and training opportunities in relation to
operation and maintenance of facilities, etc.
The certified public accounting firm selected by the City Commission at the
public hearing will specifically evaluate the financial viability of the
proposed development teams and their proposed financing strategies and will
assess cornparatively the short and long range economic and fiscal return to
the City. Additionally, they will assess the proposers' market analysis and
conclusions regarding scale and mix of commercial and public facilities and
evaluate the economic feasibility of the proposed development.
The timetable for completion of the proposed construction will be
considered, as well as the Proposer's plans and commitment to minimizing
the impact of construction on use of the site. All proposed development
must be completed within an initial specified time period; or if phased
development is proposed, the proposer must post a bond to insure that
additional phases will, in fact, take place as planned.
Proposals must present an definitive development program, project defini-
tion, site plan and design concept, financial strategy and feasibility and a
guaranteed time of completion schedule that can be realistically evaluated
under the requirements of the request for proposal to form the basis for
selection by the City.
FINANCING STRATEGY
The proposer is expected to provide financing for all building and site
improvements including the refurbishment of the City's Bayfront Audi-
torium, if this option is excercised, with the exception that the City is
prepared to expend up to $8,000,000 construction funds to provide vehicular
and pedestrian access, infrastructure, utilities and parking facilities within
the constraint of this dollar amount. The City retains the option to provide
these funds by bond financing in total or by including a portion being funded
thru the Wami Off -Street Parking Authority or in the alternative, all or a
portion being provided by an Urban Development Action Grant (UDAG) from
the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), should these
funds become available, as a part of the overall development strategy. The
amount of a potential UDAG grant will be in part determined by the scale of
private sector capital committed to the project and will require the
successful proposer to participate with the City of Miami in the application.
The Miami Off -Street Parking Authority will maintain and receive revenues
generated by all parking on the site. Site B, depicted on the accompanying
site plan, is included exclusively to provide area for parking. Site B is being
considered for the future at grade and overhead portions of the landside
connection for a new Port of Miami bridge. Site B is included here as a part
of this request for proposal in order to provide a potential of 300 parking
spaces in and around the new bridge structure within close proximity of the
Bayside project. The City's commitment of funds to the Bayside project
assumes a parking structure on Site A as well. The Miami Off -Street
Parking Authority will operate these parking facilities with the intent of
recovering the capital outlay, operational costs and debt service required for
the financing of such parking facilities. Parking rates during the term of the
-12-
lease agreement will be determined by mutual agreement between the lessee
the Miami Off -Street Parking Authority and the City of Miami in order to
not be detrimental in any way to the successful operation of the total
facility.
The proposer is expected to determine a projected parking demand and to
propose designs for providing adequate facilities on Site A and/or Site B.
In general it is expected that the proposer provide financing for public
spaces and the ancillary amenities associated with the development. The
City will provide vehicular access and service roads and acutrements,
interface connections on adjacent properties (all of which are City owned)
and utilities infrastructure to the site.
City owned property is held in public trust and connot be mortgaged or
subordinated in any way as a part of the lease agreement. The City is
prepared, however, to accept the secondary position of lease payments, a
form of subordination, to the extent determined to be reasonable in helping
the successful proposer obtain financing.
The term of the lease agreement between the successful proposer and the
City of Miami should be reasonable related to the financing strategy.
All improvements upon the site will revert to ownership by the City of
Miami at the expiration of the lease term.
The City of Miami financed and owns the existing Miamarina restaurant
facility. Restaurants in this facility are operated under a lease agreement
with Restaurant Associates, a private management firm (lease agreement
included as a port of Appendix J.) This lease runs through 1995 with a 5
year option by mutual consent of both parties.
SCHEDULE
Request for Proposals Available
Pre -proposal Conference
Proposals Opened and Made Public
Interviews with Proposers Meeting
Qualifications
Review Committee and C.P.A. firm
recommendations to City Manager
City Manager's recommendation to City
Commission at regular monthly
Commission Meeting
Begin Contract negotiations with
first ranked proposer
City Manager submits Contract for
City Commission Approval
-13-
March 29, 1983
April 25, 1983
2:00 -August I, 1983
Week of august 8,
1983
September 5, 1983
October 13, 1983
October 24, 1983
December 8, 1983
8 3--ti1r0Z
4"
iii FACILITY REQUIREMENTS AND DESiGN CRITERIA
THE SITE
The accompanying site plan depicts the site boundaries for Areas A and B.
Area B is included as an optional site exclusively for additional parking. The
proposed new port access bridge requires a large portion of Area B for grade
separation, support columns, relocation of an existing railroad access to the
Port of Miami and redeveloped north access to the Bayside site. it is
estimated that 300 parking spaces could be fitted in and around the
structure and roadways including adequate landscape improvements at grade
and on berms. The development of. Area B requires pedestrian access north/
south between Bayside and the future development of the northerly
properties, F.E.C. tract. Specifically, a wateredge Baywalk shall be
developed continuing the City's planned wateredge treatment being devel-
oped along the Miami River and major portions of the downtown Biscayne
Bay wateredge, as shown in Appendix C.
Area A, the development site is divided into 5 separate areas in order to
distinguish certain legal restraints, special requirements and existing
features.
Area A-1 includes the existing Miamarina restaurant building, a three story
structure dominates the site and includes a one story structure extending
along the northeastern edge of the marina accommodating marina support
facilities including dockmaster, laundry and boat sales areas. The area also
includes 44 parking spaces and access to the marina docks all of which is
included in a management contract agreement with the marina operator.
Additionally, restaurant service, valet parking surrounding the restaurant,
restaurant entrance dropoff, vehicular access and emergency vehical access
all fall within this area.
Area A -I is constrained by the following conditions:
1. The lease agreement with Restaurant Associates for the operation of
restaurant facilities includes an exclusivity clause restricting this entire
area by prohibiting the sale of food or beverages by other than
Restaurant Associates. The options available to the proposers include
not using the site for any development, new facilities on this site which
do not include food or beverage sales or negotiating a separate
agreement with Restaurant Associates acceptable to the City. The lease
between Restaurant Associates and the City of Miami runs through 1995
and has a 5 year option at the mutual agreement of both parties. The
lease is included in Appendix J. While the City encourages design
integration with the Miamarino restaurant facilities, there is no
numerical weighting in the evaluation criteria favoring joint ventures
with Restaurant Associates.
2. The Restaurant Associates lease also sets aside an area of this site for
non-exclusive parking for restaurant patrons and as well provides for
service access to the restaurant facilities.
3. Parking on the site includes an area for exclusive parking for restaurant
-14-
ti
i
patrons, 44 spaces exclusively for marina users and 570 metered spaces
operated by the Miami Off -Street Parking Authority. The City highly
recommends consideration be given to retaining ground level service,
parking, access, etc., and constructing the first level of any new
facilities one story above existing grade. Federal Flood Criteria for the
entire site requires a minimum of floor elevation eleven feet above mean
water level. Existing roads and walkways are presently at seven to nine
feet. Immediately to the south of the marina site, Bayfront Park
Redevelopment plans, include a bermed outdoor amphitheater reaching a
maximum elevation of twenty four feet. It is anticipated that the park
berm edge could meet the elevation of the first level of the specialty
center facilitating at grade pedestrian access. This further would
provide a separation between Bayside patrons and marina users as well as
all service access for the center.
Alternatives for dealing with the parking and access requirements for
this area will be considered and will require the mutual agreement of the
parties affected.
Area A-2 includes the existing Bayfront Municipal Auditorium and metered
parking operated by the Miami Off -Street Parking Authority. All pertinent
information on the City owned auditorium are included in Appendix E. The
City in offering the following options for use of the auditorium:
1. The auditoriums can be refurbished and used as a part of the project for
all uses included in the specialty center or additionally including any
other public purpose use compatable with the overall project.
2. The auditorium can be demolished and the site can be developed as a part
of the project with the sarne uses allowed, as well as, to provide parking
either on grade or by a new structure.
3. The auditorium can remain as it presently exists without responsibility to
the proposer for future use and maintenance.
Area A-3 lies within the Bayfront Park redevelopment project and includes
an eastern edge fronting on Biscayne Bay. The site surrounds the future
outdoor amphitheater being developed as a part of the Bayfront Park project
and it is expected that development on this site intergrate with the
amphitheatre and the Bayview. While this site area is approximately 6
acres, the buildable area is limited to not exceed 2.06 acres. As a part of
the park redevelopment, the City is filling an area of Biscayne Bay equal to
2.06 acres and there is the commitment to retain no net loss of park land
area.
Area A-3 will include a revised access to and from Biscayne Boulevard at
North East Fourth Street. The City intends to lease only the land area
covered by building facilities within this area. The lease area will be limited
to 2.06 acres. The larger geographical area is offered in order to allow
building development responsive to the several site limitations and to take
the greatest advantage of existing conditions. Proposals must take into
consideration the Bayfront Park Redevelopment plans, particularly in
connection with buildings facing Biscayne Bay and the Baywalk. The City
will value highly a proposal which integrates positively with the Bayfront
Park Redevelopment plans.
-15-
83 1
.1 i
The successful proposer will be expected to work with the architects and
designers of the Bayfront Park Redevelopment in order to insure that both
projects will gain from their coexistence.
Additional limitations to this site include a seventy two inch force main
sanitary sewer line running east -west and shown on the site plans included in
this document. No foundation or structure may fall within 10 feet of the
certerline of the force main.
Area A-4 is a proposed restaurant facility within the Bayfront Park
Redevelopment project. Preliminary design of the restaurant was included
in the work by the Bayfront Park architects and the city intends to seek a
concessionaire to operate the facility. It is included here as an option to be
included as a part of the Bayside proposal. If the proposer includes this
option, complete services, construction, financing and operation by the
proposer will be expected. Plans and pertinent information on this proposed
facility is included in Appendix F. Any proposed alteration to existing
design will require approval of the City and the City's architects.
Area A-S includes a small area at the base of a major light tower feature of
the Bayfront Park Redevelopment project which anticipates food service and
retail potential and is included here as an option to the proposer. The City
anticipates seeking a concessionaire for these facilities and would desire the
installation and operation of these facilities within the proposed structure
being built by the City to be included as a part of the Bayside proposal.
In order to mantain a reasonable profile within the park setting and the
City's major waterfront, the City is setting a height limitation on any new
structure to be developed on any part of Area A not to exceed the highest
point of the existing restaurant structure (57 feet above mean water level).
City Charter establishes setbacks and view corridor requirements of all
waterfront properties that are applicable to this site as well as pedestrian
access requirements. (Applicable portions of the City Charter are included
in Appendix J.) These conditions must be met for a proposal to qualify.
The City of Miami has licensed an annual Grand Prix Auto race which runs a
course including Biscayne Boulevard, Bayfront Park and areas of the
Miamorina site.
These events have a major economic impact on downtown businesses as well
as gaining national and international attention for Miami.
The City recommends that proposers consider maintaining site access for
the proposed future course or submit an alternative plan to be considered by
the City and the promoter (course plan included in Appendix K.)
HISTORIC AND PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
The City expects the proposed architecture to be responsive to the South
Florida sub -tropical climate and in particular the Bayside waterfront sub -
climate with breezes prevailing from the Southeast off of Biscayne Bay.
The City does not seek an architecture or a setting imitative of any other
geographic area. The appropriate historical context for the Miami
waterfront can best be expressed through the use of indigineous building
materials and forms that are responsive to the major natural conditions.
-16-
L
Heavy rainfall, high humidity, ever present
conditions would suggest unique architectural
and takes advantage of these factors.
PUBLIC SPACES
sun and periodic high vwind
response that both shelters
Public spaces should be designed to accommodate both programmed
entertainment and spontaneous performances. Lush landscape treatment,
materials and site furniture should be reflective of the larger park setting.
EXISTING RESTAURANT FACILITIES
Plans, elevations and significant information about the restaurant facilities
are provided in Appendix D.
EXISTING MUNICIPAL AUDITORIUM
The City is offering these facilities for the proposers option to renovate or
demolish. It is expected that either the renovated facilities or new facilities
would include the some allowed uses as the marina site specialty center
facilities and as well could include other public purpose uses compatible and
supportive to the entire facility.
An Adaptive Use Study for the Bayfront Municipal Auditorium which
includes plans, elevations and descriptive information is included in
Appendix E.
EXISTING MARINA
Plans, elevations and descriptive information is included in Appendix F.
ADDITIONAL FACILITIES
Parking requirements, new access from Biscayne Boulevard, all service,
access and ancillary facilities requirements should be thoroughly addressed
in the proposal.
-»- 83-`'12 ti ti
IV. OPERATIiJG REQUIREMENTS
MANAGEMENT
Lessee will be required to maintain reasonable operating hours and proposals
should include a year round schedule for all proposed uses and concession.
On site management and staff requirements should be detailed as a part of
the proposal. Interface with City departments should be included.
Method of recording cash receipts should be included. The City would
expect daily records of gross receipts be kept and reported accompanying
regular payment to the City.
The lessee will pay all license fees applicable taxes including property taxes
and insurance requirements.
ADVERTISING AND PROMOTION
Proposals should elaborate plans for advertising and promoting all aspects of
the Bayside facilities and programs.
The City looks to the total redevelopment of it's downtown waterfront
properties as providing a major attraction for destination visitors. This
includes the Bayfront Park Redevelopment Project the commercial develop-
ment of Miamarina/Bayside, the future development of recently acquired 35
acre site just north of the proposed Bayside project (proposals include a
Maritme/Transportation Museum, Aquarium ete.) Bicentennial Park continu-
ing north and Watson Island with currently envisioned recreation, entertain-
ment and cultural facilties to be developed on the southwest half of the 87
acre site.
Lessee advertising and promotion will be expected to include these facilities
as in turn, promotional resources available to the City will include Bayside
as a major Miami attraction.
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY, MINORITY EMPLOYMENT AND BUSINESS UTILI-
ZATION REQUIREMENTS
All contractors shall comply with all applicable minority advancement
ordinances including the provisions of City of Miami Ordinance No. 9530
included in Appendix J.
Minorities are expected to be an integral part of the design/development
team, participate substantially in construction contracts and jobs, and
comprise a significant part of permanent management team, businesses and
work force created by the development.
S3--f:12
3
V DECLARATION
Howard V. Gary
City Manager
City of Miami, Florida Submitted , 1983
The undersigned, as proposer, declares that the only persons interested in this
proposal are named herein, that no other person has any interest in this Proposal or
in the Agreement of Lease to which this Proposal pertains, that this Proposal is
made without connection or arrangement with any other person and that this
Proposal is in every respect fair, in good faith, and without collusion or fraud.
The proposer further declares that he has complied in every respect with all of the
instructions to Proposers, that he has read all addenda, if any, and that he has
satisfied himself fully relative to all matters and conditions with respect to the
Lease to which the proposal pertains.
The proposer agrees, if this Proposal is accepted, to execute an appropriate Lease
Agreement for the purpose of establishing a formal contractual relationship
between the proposer and the City of !'Miami, Florida, for the performance of all
requirements to which this Proposal pertains.
The proposer states that this Proposal is based upon the Proposal Documents and
addenda, if any.
Signature
Title
Name of Firm, Individual or Corporation
-19-
Signature
Title
:4
VI FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE AND PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION
PROPOSER'S QUESTIONNAIRE
A proposal for the development and management of the i3ayside specialty
center site shall not be considered unless all the information requested in
this questionnorie is provided by the proposer. Statements must be complete
and accurate. Omissions, inaccuracy or misstatement shall be cause for
rejection of a proposal.
Statements and answers relating to each question in this questionnaire may
be answered on the page on which the question is found or by attaching
8112"Al" supplemental sheets. Photographs or other illustrative materials
should be placed in an envelope identified by the proposer's name and
address and identified by the page'number of the questionnaire to which the
supplemental material is applicable.
By submission of a proposal, the proposer acknowledges and agrees that the
City of Miami has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems
appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in this
questionnaire, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all
information sought in such inquiry or investigation.
If an independent general contractor, construction manager and/or opera-
tional manager is to be involved, then the applicable pages of this
questionnaire should be completed for each such entity.
-20-
63- 0.
I
PROPOSER
INMI '
Address for purposes of notice or other communication relating to the proposal
Telephone No.
The proposer is a Sole Proprietorship ( ); Partnership ( ); Corporation ();
Corporation ( ); or _
Explain:
-21-
8 3- :12
,16 1
PARTNERSHIP STATEMENT
If proposer is a partnership, answer the following:
I. Date of Organization
2. General Partnership ( )
Limited Partnership ( )
3. Statement of Partnership recorded? Yes ( ) No ( )
Date Boo _ Page County State
4. Has the partnership done business in the State of Florida?
Yes( ) No( ) When?
Where?
5. Name, address, and partnership share of each general and limited partner. (If
partnership is a corporation complete the following page for corporation.)
General/
Limited Name Address Share
6. Attach a complete copy of the Partnership Agreement.
-22-
"it
CORPORATION STATEMENT
If proposer is corporation, answer the following:
I. When incorporated?
2. Where incorporated?
3. Is the corporation authorized to do business in Florida?
Yes( ) No ( )
4. The corporation is held: Publicly ( ) Privately ( )
5. If publicly held, how and where is the stock traded?
6. List the following:
Authorized
(a) Number of voting shares:
(b) Number of nonvoting shares:
(c) Number of shareholders:
(d) Value per share of Common Stock:
Par
$
Book
$
Market
$
Issued Outstanding
7. Furnish the name, title, address and the number of voting and nonvoting shares of
stock held by each officer and director and each shareholder owning more than 5%
of any class of stock. If more than 5% of any class of stock is held by one or more
corporations, then each owner -corporation must also complete separates pages
and (type corporation name on said pages and for identification purposes) and
furnish the financial statement required on page.
If said owner -corporations are owned by other corporations, then these other
corporations must also complete separate pages and (type corporation name on
said pages and for identification purposes) and furnish the financial statement
require on page. The City requires information on all corporations that directly or
indirectly have an ownership interest in the proposer -corporation.
8. If an individual or corporation will be guaranteeing performance of the proposer -
corporation, state name here
and also complete pages and if corporation type
corporation name on said pages and for identification purposes), and furnish
financial statement required on page for the individual or corporate guarantor.
-23-
83-- 0 %O
PROPOSER'S EXPERIENCE STATEMENT
Describe in detail the duration and extent of your business experience with
special emphasis upon experience related to commercial developments,
restaurants and shopping centers. Also state in detail the names and
pertinent experience of the persons who will be directly involved in
development and management of the business. List the names and locations
of restaurants and shopping centers currently owned and your percentage
ownership, restaurants and shopping centers currently managed. In addition,
please also provide photographs or other illustrative material depicting
projects that will demonstrate your ability to complete a quality develop-
ment for the Bayside waterfront project. The name and address should be
given for each project identified as well as persons familiar with the
development who will respond to inquiries from the City. You should also
identify your specific role in each project.
PROPOSER'S FINANCIAL DATA
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
Proposer, owner -corporations of proposer, and any person or business entity
guaranteeing the performance of the proposer must attach a complete
report, prepared in accordance with good accounting practice, reflecting
current financial condition. The report must include a balance sheet and
annual income statement. The person or entity covered by the statement
must be prepared to substantiate all information shown.
SURETY INFORMATION
Has any surety or bonding company ever been required to perform upon your
default? Yes( ) No( ).
If yes, attach a statement naming the surety or bonding company, date,
amount of bond, and the circumstances surrounding said default and
performance.
BANKRUPTCY INFORMATION
Have you ever been declared bankrupt? Yes( ) No( ).
If yes, state date, court jurisdiction, amount of liabilities, and amount of
assets.
PENDING LITIGATION
Provide on attached sheets detailed information regarding pending litigation,
liens, or claims involving any participant in the proposal.
-24-
83-L12
I
PROPOSER'S REFERENCES
List four persons or firms with whom you have conducted business
transactions during the past three years. At least two of the references
named are to have knowledge of your debt payment history. At least one
reference must be a financial institution.
REFERENCE NO. I
Name:
Firm:
Title:
Address:
Telephone:
Nature and magnitude of purchase, sale, loan business association, etc.:
REFERENCE NO. 2
Name:
Firm:
Title:
Address:
Telephone:
Nature and magnitude of purchase, sale, loan, business association, etc.:
REFERENCE NO. 3
Name:
Firm:
Title:
-25-
83-ti12
Address:
Telephone:
Nature and magnitude of purchase, sale, loan, business association, etc.:
REFERENCE NO. 4
Name:
Firm:
Title:
Address:
Telephone:
Nature and magnitude of purchase, sale, loan, business association, etc.:
-26- SO — 10'
U
.0
PROPOSER'S ARCHITECT
Name, address and telephone number of architectural firm:
Name
Street Address
Mailing Address
City, State, Zip Code
elephone Number
Names of principals and their titles who will be chiefly responsible for the
design of the Miamorino Waterfront development:
Name Title
Name Title
Name Title
Names, addresses and telephone number of other design consultants who will
have a major role in designing the Miamarina Waterfront project.
Name of F irm Name of Firm
treet Address Street Address
Mailing Address Mailing Address
City, State, Zip Code Z7ity, State, Zip Code
elep one Number Telephone Number
Name of Principal Contact Name of Principal Contact
-27-
83- :12
EXPERIENCE STATEMENT OF PROPOSER'S ARCHITECT
Describe in detail the duration and extent of your architectural experience
with special emphasis upon experience related to commercial developments,
restaurants, and shopping centers. Also, state in detail the names and
pertinent experience of the principals who will be directly involved in
designing the Bayside waterfront project. In addition, please also include
photographs or other illustrative material depicting projects that will
demonstrate your ability to design a quality development for the Bayside
waterfront project. The name and address should be given for each project
identified as well as persons familiar with the development who will respond
to inquiries from the City. You should also identify your specific role in
each project.
-28-
83-ti�%
REFERENCES OF PROPOSER'S ARCHITECT
List two persons or firms for whom you have completed projects during the
past three years.
REFERENCE NO. I
Name:
Firm:
Title:
Address:
Telephone:
Nature and magnitude of business association:
REFERENCE NO. 2
Name:
Firm:
Title:
Address:
Telephone:
Nature and magnitude of business association:
-29- 83~ti12
EXPERIENCE STAMMENT OF PROPOSER'S
CONTRACTOR OR CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
Describe in detail the duration and extent of your construction experience
with special emphasis upon experience related to commercial developments,
restaurants, and shopping centers. Also, state in detail the names and
pertinent experience of the principals who will be directly involved in con-
structing the Bayside waterfront project. In addition, please also include
photographs or other illustrative material depicting projects that will
demonstrate your ability to construct a quality development for the Bayside
waterfront project. The name and address should be given for each project
identified as well as persons familiar with the development who will respond
to inquiries from the City. You should also identify your specific role in
each project.
FINANCIAL DATA FOR PROPOSER'S
CONTRACTOR OR CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
Attach a complete report, prepared in accordance with good accounting
practice, reflecting current financial condition. The report must include a
balance sheet and annual income statement. The person or entity covered
by the statement must be prepared to substantiate all information shown.
SURETY INFORMATION
Has any surety or bounding company ever been required to perfrom upon
your default? Yes( ) No ( )
If yes, attach a statement naming the surety or bonding company, date,
amount of bond, and the circumstances surrounding said default and per-
formance.
BANKRUPTCY INFORMATION
Have you ever been declared bankrupt? Yes( ) No( )
If your yes, state date, court jurisdiction, amount of liabilities, and amount
of assesta.
PENDING LITIGATION
Provide on attached sheets detailed information regarding pending litigation,
liens, or claims in which you are involved.
-30-
83--201;�
I
M
REFERENCE OF PROPOSER'S
CONTRACTOR OR CONSTRUCTION ir1ANAGER
List two persons or firms for whom you have completed projects during the
past three years.
REFERENCE NO. I
Name:
Firm:
Title:
Address:
Telephone:
Nature and magnitude of business association:
REFERENCE NO. 2
Name:
Firm:
Title:
Address:
Telephone:
Nature and magnitude of business association:
-31-
PROPOSER'S MANAGEMENT CONTRACTOR
Name, address and telephone number of management contractor:
Name
Street Address
Mailing Address
City, State, Zip Code
Telephone Number
Names of principals and their titles who will be chiefly responsible for the
operation of the Boyside Waterfront Development:
Name Title
Name Title
Name 1 itle
-32-
ti
�:3-12
EXPERIENCE STATEMENT OF PROPOSERS
MANAGEMENT CONTRACTOR
Described in detail the duration and extent of your management experience.
Also, state in detail the names and pertinent experience of the principals
who will be directly involved in the management of the Bayside waterfront
facilities. In addition, please also include photographs or other illustrative
material depicting projects that will demonstrate your ability to manage a
quality development. The name and address should be given for each project
identified as well as persons familiar with the development who will respond
to inquiries from the City. You should also identify your specific role in
each project.
FINANCIAL DATA FOR PROPOSER'S
MANAGEMENT CONTRACTOR
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
Attach a complete report, prepared in accordance with good accounting
practice, reflecting current financial condition. The report must include a
balance sheet and annual income statement. The person or entity covered
by the statement must be prepared to substantiate all information shown.
SURETY INFORMATION
Has any surety or bonding company ever been required to perform upon your
default? Yes( ) No( ).
If yes, attach a statement naming the surety or bonding company, date,
amount of bond, and the circumstances surrounding said default and
performance.
BANKRUPTCY INFORMATION
Have you ever been declared bankrupt? Yes( ) No( ).
If yes, state date, court jurisdiction, amount of liabilities, and amount of
assets.
PENDING LITIGATION
Provide on attached sheets detailed information regarding pending litigation,
liens, or claims in which you are involved.
-33- S3"' :111-1
`J
6
REFEREVICES OF PROPOSER'S
MANAGEMENT CONTRACTOR
List two persons or firms for whom you have managed projects during the
past three years or have knowledge of your hotel management capability.
REFERENCE NO. I
Name:
Firm:
Title:
Address:
Telephone:
Nature and magnitude of business association:
REFERENCE NO. Z
Name:
Firm:
Title:
Address:
Telephone:
Nature and magnitude of business association:
-34-
�3-tiI
6
VII GENERAL CONTRACT TERMS
Upon authorization of the City Commission the City Manager shall negotiate
all aspects of a contract for Development and Lease with the successful
proposer.
The contract shall address, but not be limited to the following topics:
I. LEASE TERM
2. RENT
A guaranteed minimum and a percentage of the Gross Sales whichever is
greater on the Entire Premises or on the Individual Leased Parts Shall
Constitute Rent.
Definition of Gross Sales
Payment Schedules
Right to Audit
No Counterclaim or Abatement
Subordination of Rents
3. CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS
Description of IMPROVEMENTS
Developer's Obligation to Construct IMPROVEMENTS
Submission of Plans
Approval of Plans
Scope of Review by CITY/Off-Street Parking Authority
Changes in Plans
Submission of Plans for Building Permit
Contract(s) for Construction
Conditions Precedent to Commencement of Construction
Commencement and Completion of Construction of IMPROVEMENT
Progress Reports
Payment of Contractors and Suppliers
Cancellation or Discharge of Liens Filed
Construction Co -Ordination and Cooperation
Ownership of IMPROVEMENTS
4. PREPARATION OF PREMISES FOR DEVELOPME14T
DEVELOPER Assurance
5. MANAGEMENT OF LEASED PREMISES
6. EQUITY CAPITAL AND MORTGAGE FINANCING
Sufficient Funds to Construct IMPROVEMENTS
Notification of Securing Sufficient Funds
DEVELOPER to Furnish Name and Address of Mortgagee
DEVELOPER to Notify CITY of Other Encumbrances
Rights and Duties of Mortgagee
Obligations of Persons Other Than Mortgagee Acquiring Leashold
7. RESTRICTIONS ON USE
Authorized Uses
Limitation on Retail Sub -Tenants
-35-
83--ti12
10
VII GEt�IERAL CONTRACT TERMS
Upon authorization of the City Commission the City Manager shall negotiate
all aspects of a contract for Development and Lease with the successful
proposer.
The contract shall address, but not be limited to the following topics:
I. LEASE TERM
2. RENT
A guaranteed minimum and a percentage of the Gross Sales whichever is
greater on the Entire Premises or on the Individual Leased Parts Shall
Constitute Rent.
Definition of Gross Sales
Payment Schedules
Right to Audit
No Counterclaim or Abatement
Subordination of Rents
3. CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS
Description of IMPROVEMENTS
Developer's Obligation to Construct IMPROVEMENTS
Submission of Plans
Approval of Plans
Scope of Review by CITY/Off-Street Parking Authority
Changes in Plans
Submission of Plans for Building Permit
Contract(s) for Construction
Conditions Precedent to Commencement of Construction
Commencement and Completion of Construction of lYiPROVEMENT
Progress Reports
Payment of Contractors and Suppliers
Cancellation or Discharge of Liens Filed
Construction Co -Ordination and Cooperation
Ownership of IMPROVEMENTS
4. PREPARATION OF PREMISES FOR DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPER Assurance
5. MANAGEMENT OF LEASED PREMISES
6. EQUITY CAPITAL AND MORTGAGE FINANCING
Sufficient Funds to Construct IMPROVEMENTS
Notification of Securing Sufficient Funds
DEVELOPER to Furnish Name and Address of Mortgagee
DEVELOPER to Notify CITY of Other Encumbrances
Rights and Duties of Mortgagee
Obligations of Persons Other Than Mortgagee Acquiring Leashold
7. RESTRICTIONS ON USE
Authorized Uses
Limitation on Retail Sub -Tenants
-35-
S312
. i r
B. PUBLIC CHARGES
Covenant for Payment of Public Charges
Evidence of Payment of Public Charges
9. INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE
Indemnification of DEVELOPER
Types of Insurance to be Carried by DEVELOPER
Non -Cancellation Clause
Certificates of Insurance
Right of CITY to Obtain Insurance
Non -Waiver of DEVELOPER'S Obligations
Partial Loss of Damage Not to Terminate Rent or Lease
Extensive Loss or Damage Rendering ItAPROVE MEI-,iTS Unusable
Agreement Not To Sue
10. MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT
Maintenance and Repair
Reserve for Replacements
'Haste
Alterations of IMPROVEMENTS
Neighboring Excavation
11. CONDEMNATION
Adjustments of Rent
Proration of Condemnation Awards
Temporary Taking
Award Taking
Definition of Taking
12. DEFAULT - TERMINATION
Default by DEVELOPER
Default by CITY
Obligations, Rights and Remedies Cummulative
Non -Action or Failure to Observe Provisions Hereof
Non -Performance Due to Causes Beyond Control of Parties
Surrender of Premises
Ownership of Equipment and Furnishings on Termination
Party in Position of Surety with Respect to Obligations
13. OPTION TO RENEW
14. REPRESENTATIONS
Representations by CITY
Representations by DEVELOPER
15. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING
16. MISCELLANEOUS
Right of Inspection
Access to Premises
Recognition of Mortgagee Requirements
Notices
Provisions of Law Deemed Included
How Agreement Affected by Provisions Held Invalid
Applicable Law and Construction
-36-
SOi%%# �
A
Amendments
Gender and Number
Award of Contract
Mortgageable Leasehold
Certificates
Management Agreement with Off -Street Parking Authority
Non -Disturbance and Attornment Agreements
Memorandum of Lease
Change of Form of Ownership
Reasonableness
Arbitration
Good Faith Binder
Correction or Modification of Descriptions
-37-
83 `21`'
t ell - If. r 9 r4 r RN!'i f•/ t (N , r/i /r r;.: `a
U /�19: "r •i� f :c , j
al
049 l
i .��
:fv 0(,-7
IN
•�
It '
. b �r� •i/!,v
1'}.1 �., rb'j t). � tin. r F?,v •►c. � f h-k .Yc.' �.<. r Grl, �
61, 1:.. 4'
/ / S +F i /C
I 5 L ' %i >f/, r l f'_.r^T /" !-/., ILf�.•4 . /�.r1 1"i'f%r- t., r�j.�.`%r� y
S'ic ',`t141z COk NLL• (5;2 6tPeai) I��i`. t1. ?t:c1/:l'r( /1iccl'i
r f i
(('r' TttE
GG:L.L0 cCA: ci= 734 6• (h%tGL
-fJ �rz f5'4i/ -�- K)z4Lr�.v�
/�vuLD liAt, z tS f't`''P=, L(l
7 ui«uwiilb'IL'►
7 lip c
�
*ow*- ,Zr/'r',, 1 4/t. /) iI S I t '!N (S A.CX t4 . (r./I/ i !"_ .^• .A'f
�tttL^c Ks 7frt t/l /iie)r �}f 4G/t
Lt i�i t e K STF k L +E cat/
7Rrr L.l 8AJ44 C7r-•1 L 1)l /LCh (l: LLt
AIL !•f �Urt.l.) �}i ! /L/�! ��l/iJi /GCy %L
ltC 2j
r�,VIL'1D fJ(%/�l77CvLr;C S%ru.<lz.6.6j
d
af fi` 40o!" tiY•
�sA,,),ira,i
)1//'•�•%(�/1 !N6 �"i9nlr %f.�,,� lrrr, / fJ
!�� �i E'i7/ ri jJi%;i'I' 1-�: r.��� �+%�j
r
oc �ketil,oi 7j�r-
I� yDu !'rL✓fc u6 FLC PAAk- r4li�h, :r tc'r�c rlr�i r) •rr. nc�)l�-� P,,nf'(/<"r,c,7
r5�5L,t ti,: 8L
I7
nTN PAil .
' � "' t Pc i F �•r !i•c.
!11rC}'` ycz-)
` '✓ tQ J f�,a; C� !'ice t ` I��
G^ S
Cif,? t., , "..
` •1
0
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Commission
Jose R. Garcia -Pedrosa
City Attorney
MA#016, 1983
J-83-208
6ayside Specialty Shopping
Center
Resolution No. 83-17, 1/13/83
(1)
Item #4 on the City Commission Agenda for March 18, 1983 is
the subject of an advertised Public Hearing to approve a
Request For Proposals in connection with the Bayside Project
encompassing 20 acres. Through adoption of this resolution,
you will authorize the issuance of a Request For Proposals,
select a certified public accounting firm and appoint the
members of a review committee which shall evaluate proposals
and make recommendations to the City Manager.
Originally, the Project's geographical area was defined as 15
acres at the time the Project was declared to be best
accomplished using Unified Development Project procedures
(Resolution No. 83-17, 1/10/83). For clarity and continuity,
we have prepared the attached proposed resolution (J-83-208)
amending Resolution No. 83-17 to reflect the increased
geographical area; if approved, the amending resolution will
be designated by the City Clerk as Resolution No. 83-17A.
- The draft of the Request For Proposals which accompanies Item
#4 will also be updated to reflect the Public Hearing on
March 18, 1983 instead of February 24, 1983; further,
statements in the Request For Proposals indicating that
responses thereto shall be kept confidential will be deleted
due to the Public Records Law.
JGP/RFC/rr
cc; Howard V. Gary, City Manager
Ralph G. Ongie, City Clerk
83 :I
:9 q
CIL.
/*
I e -
jv
VWS
At I
fit All
*Owl
At-
LV
0
r]
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Commission
Jose R. Garcia -Pedrosa
City Attorney
M&9046, 1983
J-83-208
Bayside Specialty Shopping
Center
Resolution No. 83-17, 1/13/83
(1)
Item #4 on the City Commission Agenda for March 18, 1983 is
the subject of an advertised Public Hearing to approve a
Request For Proposals in connection with the Baysid e Project
encompassing 20 acres. Through adoption of this resolution,
you will authorize the issuance of a Request For Proposals,
select a certified public accounting firm and appoint the
members of a review committee which shall evaluate proposals
and make recommendations to the City Manager.
Originally, the Project's geographical area was defined as 15
acres at the time the Project was declared to be best
accomplished using Unified Development Project procedures
(Resolution No. 83-17, 1/10/83). For clarity and continuity,
we have prepared the attached proposed resolution (J-83-208)
amending Resolution No. 83-17 to reflect the increased
geographical area; if approved, the amending resolution will
be designated by the City Clerk as Resolution No. 83-17A.
The draft of the Request For Proposals which accompanies Item
#4 will also be updated to reflect the Public Hearing on
March 18, 1983 instead of February 24, 1983; further,
statements in the Request For Proposals indicating that
responses thereto shall be kept confidential will be deleted
due to the Public Records Law.
JGP/RFC/rr
cc: Howard V. Gary, City Manager
Ralph G. Ongie, City Clerk