The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutR-83-0626J-83-642 Is RESOLUTION NO. �3k-)A%�% A RESOLUTION APP70VIMG THE MOST QUALIFIED CONSULTING FIRMS TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE RENOVATION OF MOORE PARK: AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO UNDERTAKE NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE MOST QUALIFIED FIRMS, TO ARRIVE AT A CONTRACT WHICH IS FAIR, COMPETITIVE, AND REASONABLE, AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO PRESENT THE NEGOTIATED AGREE- MENT TO THE COMMISSION FOR RATI- FICATION AND APPROVAL BY THE COM- MISSION. WHEREAS, the U.S. Department of the Interior, through the National Park Service, Urban Park and Recreation Recovery Action Program, has approved a grant application for funds in the amount of $699,900 for the Moore Park Redevelopment Project; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 83-514,passed and adopted on June 9, 1983, the City Commission committed $300,000 in Capital Improvement Program Funds to meet the 30/70 local/federal match- ing funds requirement of the aforementioned grant program; and WHEREAS, a resolution authorizing the City Manager to accept the grant funds and execute an agreement with the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service to implement this project is pending approval by the City Commission at the July 18, 1983 Commission Meeting; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 83-537, passed and adopted on June 15, 1983, the City Commission approved the designation of Moore Park Redevelopment as a Category "B" project and appointed Carl Kern, Director of the Department of Parks as Chairman of the Competitive Selection Committee; and WHEREAS, the Consultant Selection Committee solicited ex- pressions of interest from qualified consultants, evaluated the qualifications of those firms who responded to its inquiry, and then selected the firms most qualified to provide professional landscape architectural, architectural and engineering services for the Redevelopment of Moore Park, all in accordance with the CITY COMMISSION MEETING OF JUL IS 1983 ESotuil�'r No. 83-62bs. State of Florida's Consultant Competitive Negotiations Act, en- acted by the legislature of Florida July 1, 1973, and by the City of Miami Ordinance No. 8965, July 23, 1979. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIA11I , FLORIDA: Section 1. The City Commission hereby approves the recom- mendation by the Consultant Selection Committee of the following firms as the most qualified to provide professional landscape archi- tectural, architectural and engineering services for the design and construction of the redevelopment of Moore Park as listed in ranked order: (a) Firm No. 1: O'Leary, Shafer-Cosio, P.A. (b) Firm No. 2: Albert R. Perez Associates, P.A. (c) Firm No. 3: Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. Section 2. The City Commission hereby authorizes the City Manager to negotiate and enter into a professional services contract on behalf of the City of Miami with the firm ranked first in order in Section 1 hereinabove. In the event that the Citv Manager cannot negotiate an agreement which, in his opinion, is fair, competitive and reasonable with the firm ranked first in order, then he is here- by authorized to terminate such negotiation and to proceed to nego- tiate with the second most qualified firm. In the event that he fails to negotiate a satisfactory agreement with the second firm, then he is authorized to undertake negotiations with the third most qualified firm. Section 3. The City Manager is directed to present the City Commission with the negotiated agreement at the earliest scheduled meeting of the City Commission immediately following the negotiation 83-62t;, of said agreement for ratification and approval by the Commission. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of July , 1983. Maurice A. Ferre 14AYOR ATTEST: _-7, �7> RAL H G. ONGIE ITY CLERK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: ROBERT F. CLARK DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS TO FORKS AND CORRECTNESS: 40 /� - /dfO04� SE R. GARCIA-PEDROSA ITY ATTORNEY 83-b26- I CITY OF Nil -NMI. FLORIDA 2C.-I 04;0-� al COMMISSION ACTION ro Howard V. Gary City Manager rRDY C6 Kern Director Department of Parks INTER -OFFICE MEMORAPJDUM OATE July 12, 1983 FILE Approval of Landscape Architectu- ral, Architectural and Engineering Firms and Authorization to Negotiate a Contractual Agreement PLFEP,ENcEs Agenda Item for City Commission Meeting of July 18, 1983. Eft .L 05WIE5 "It is recommended that the Land- scape Architectural, Architectural and Engineering firms found most qualified for the provision of pro- fessional services related to the Moore Park Redevelopment be approved in ranked order, and the City Mana- ger and/or his representative be authorized to enter into negotiations with said firms in their respective ranked order." On Friday, July 15, 1983, an approved Consultant Selection Committee met to select a firm to work on the Moore Park Redevelopment Project, financed through the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Urban Parks and Recreation Recovery Action Program matched with funds from the Capital Improvement Program. The major elements to be considered on this project include: a. The demolition and replacement of abandoned maintenance and concession buildings, and the boxing, restroom and recreation buildings. b. The rehabilitation of tennis and racquetball courts, the track and the softball fields. C. Rehabilitation of the playground and equipment replacement. d. Rehabilitation of irrigation and lighting systems. e. Replacement of site furniture and fencing f. Related site work, such as grading to correct drainage problems and replacement of walkways. Page 1 of 2 83-62b. 83-62f .. 11 1 Howard V. Gary July 12, 1983 The Landscape Architectural, Architectural and Engineering firms found most qualified to provide professional services in the above regard, are in ranked order: With the City Commission's approval of these names and authorization, the City Manager and/or his representative, could enter into nego- tiation with said firms in order of their rank. CK/JYS/sls /, I x�f "I I' Page 2 of 2 83-626 83-626 11 1 ' CITY OF MIAMI. FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO Howard V , r Gary DATE: July 11, 1983 FILE: City Manager susJECT Moore Park Redevelopment Projec Consultant Selection Process FROM• Carl Kern REFERENCES: Director Department of Parks ENCLOSURES: Subsequent to your conversation with Juanita Shearer of our staff, and as a result of a discussion with Robert Clark, Deputy City Attorney, and Jack Eads, Assistant City Manager, we have developed the following schedule for the initial phases of the Moore Park Redevelopment Project: July 12 Submissions accepted in accordance with Request for Proposals. July 15 Presentation by short listed firms. July 18 Names of the three most qualified firms, listed in ranked order, provided to the City Manager on the morning of July 18, for discussion and acceptance as a Pocket Item. July 28 Ratification of the agreement nego- tiated with the firm designated at the July 18 meeting. Late October Advertisement for Bids Late November Receipt of Bids December 8 Award of Construction Contract on City Commission meeting. December 30 Notice to Proceed issued by or before this time. Please advise us if any further issues remain CY y�}5/cg cc: Robert Clark Jack Eads Manny Alvarez Aurelio Perez Lugones to be resolved. 83-626 .. CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO Howard V . Gary DATE City Manager FROM Carl Kern �EFEREvices Director Department of Parks kW1 July 18, 1983 FILE Moore Park Redevelopment Project - Consultant Selection Procedures Pursuant to Resolution #83-537, passed and adopted by the City Commission on June 13, 1983, which designated the renovation and development of Moore Park as a Category "B" Project, proposals were solicited from qualified consult- ants. On July 13 the Consultant Selection Committee appointed by the City Manager reviewed the eleven proposals received, and subsequently held presentations on July 15 and 16 to establish a list of those most qualified to provide profes- sional landscape architectural, architectural and engineering services to the City. The following, listed in ranked order of recommendation, are the names of those firms which made presentations to the Consultant Selection Committee: a) No. 1: O'Leary-Shafer-Cosio, P.A. Landscape Architects, Land Planners Jimmie Allen & Associates, P.A., Architects Maurice Gray Associates, Inc., Structural and Civil Engineers Kenneth Warren Associates, Inc., Electrical and Mechanical Engineers b) No. 2: Albert R. Perez Associates, P.A. Landscape Architects - Planners Edna Mingo, A.I.A., Architect Fraga Engineers, Mechanical and Electrical Engineers Maurice Gray Associates, Inc., Civil and Structural Engineers c) No. 3: Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. Landscape Architecture, Architecture and Civil Engineering 83-62C TO: Howard V. Gary July 18, 1983 c) No. 3: (continued) 16 Ralph B. Johnson Associates, Architect Louis J. Aguirre & Associates, Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Maurice Gray Associates, Inc., Structural Engineering d) No. 4: Stresau, Smith and Stresau, P.A. Landscape Architects & Land Planners Ronald E. Frazier & Associates, P.A., Architects Williams -Russell & Johnson, Inc. Consulting Engineers e) No.5.5:(Tie) Henderson -Rosenberg -Scully & Associates Architecture, Planning Joseph Middlebrooks, A.I.A. & Associates, Architecture Raphael Pena, Engineer f) No.5.5:(Tie) Laura Llerena and Associates, Inc., Landscape Architecture/Planning Arquitectonica International Coro_oration, Architects Charles A. Mitchell, Professional Engineers g) No. 7: Howard Ostrout, Jr. and Associates Landscape Architects CK/JS/cg Enclosures Pancoast Albaisa, Architects, P.A. Carr, Smith & Associates, Inc., Engineering 83-b26I . 7 4 Presentation Schedule Moore Park Redevelopment Project Friday, July 15, 1983: 8.30 AM - Post Buckley Schuh and Jernigan, and Consultants 9.30 AM - Stresau, Smith and Stresau, and Consultants 10.30 AM - Albert R. Perez Associates , and Consultants 11.30 AM - O'Leary - Shafer - Cosio, PA., and Consultants Saturday, July 16, 1983: 8.30 AM - Howard Ostrout, Jr., and Associates, and Consultants 9.30 AM - Henderson - Posenberg - Scully and Associates, and Consultants 10.30 AM - Laura Llerna and Associates, and Consultants 83--826, CONSULTANT SELECTION TEAM MOORE PARK REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Sergio Rodriguez, Director, Planning Dent. (represented by Joe McManus) John Jackson, Assistant Director, Public Works Dept. Albert Howard, Director, Recreation Dept. (represented by Kevin Smith*) Adriene MacBeth, Office of the City Manager r Santiago Jorge -Ventura, Building and Zoning Division** Francina Culmer Brooks, Assistant Director, Community Development Dept. Carl Kern, Director, Parks Dept.** (represented by Juanita Shearer) *attended July 15 **attended July 16 JS/cg 7/18/83 83-626 MOORE PARK REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CONSULTING TEAMS 1. O'LEARY, SHAFER, COSIO - Landscape Architects Jimmie Allen and Associates - Architects Maurice Gray Associates - Engineers (Structural and Civil) Kenneth Warren Associates - Engineers (Electrical and Mechanic) 2. ALBERT R. PEREZ ASSOCIATES - Landscape Architects Edna Mingo - Architect .Fraga Associates - Engineers (Mechanical and Electrical) Maurice Gray - Engineer (Civil and Structural) 3. STRESAU, SMITH AND STRESAU - Landscape Architects Ronald Frazier and Associates - Architecture Williams -Russell and Johnson, Inc. - Engineers ( Civil, Structural, Mechanical and Electrical) 4. MARIANO CORRAL AND ASSOCIATES - Landscape Architects Williams- Russell and Johnson, Inc. - Engineers Iburitz-Salazar and Associates - Architects S. HENDERSON, ROSENBERG AND SCULLY - Landscape Architects Joseph Middlebrooks - Architect Raphael Pena - Engineer 6. The Joint Venture of: ELON MICKELS ASSOCIATES - Landscape Architects and MATEU ASSOCIATES - Architects Dalla Rizza and Associates - Engineers 7. LAURA LLERENA AND ASSOCIATES - Landscape Architects Architectonica International Corporation - Architects Charles C. Mitchell - Engineer 8. FALCON AND BUENO - Landscape Architects, Architects and Engineers 9. RHETT ROY - Landscape Architect Rodrigo J. Saavedra Associates - Architects Berry, Calvin, Broome and Farina - Engineers 10. HOWARD OSTROUT, JR. AND ASSOCIATES - Landscape Architects Pancoast, Albaisa Architects - Architects Carr, Smith and Associates - Engineers 11. POST, BUCKLEY, SCHUH AND JERNIGAN - Landscape Architects and Architects Ralph B. Johnson - Concept Development Louis J. Aguirre - Engineer (Mechanical and Electrical) Maurice Gray Associates - Engineers . %L CRITERIA: To FORK SHORT LIST YUK T�PT' LIST FOR PkRUC;IZS)LEIII44TI.AAITAI�O�l-IS- A 6 PREVIOUS PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Oy,,S el el -MAXIMUM VALUE • a) Years in the field for prime consultant: 5 5 b) sub -consultants: experience in designing public facilities intended for15 c) Previous heavy usage; experience in dealing with public agencies d) Previous experience in designing 15 Sub -Tot&] lb e ORGANIZATION & STAFF a) Size of the Prime Consulting Firm should.be adequate to deal with the overall project as well as the Sub -Consultants. 14 b) size of each Sub-ConSulting Firms should be adequate to deal 10 with their portion of the project. c) Range of skills of Prime & Sub -Consulting Firms should be 14 adequate for the project. Sub -Total • LOCATION Or OFFICE Prime Consultants Dade/Broward=2/State of Fla.=l/Out Of State=O Architects Dade/Broward=2/State of Fla.=l/Out of State=u Landscape Dade./Broward=2/State of Fla.=l/Out of State=O Architects Dade/Broward=2/State of Fla.=l/Out of State=O rngincers Dade/Broward=2/State of Fla.=l/Out Of State=O Others Sub -Total • AFFIRIATIVE ACTIO14 12 Minority participation of Prime or Sub -Consultants TOTAL �.. ".-"WER' S PERSONAL &RECARD MAKItdUM � ,• •' "' VALCE Item Subject Area • CREATIVITY & SKILL a. Innovative approach to projects , 5 b. Creative past work . . 5 c. Successfully completed extraordinary designs. . 5 Sub -Total • EXPERIENCE a. Projects of similar size . 2 b. Projects of similar complexity . 5 c. Projects of equal community interest . 2 d. Projects in So. Florida or similar climates . 5 Q. �'ltQ�6t�$$X7CD[X�$SC7CDt6jXBD{XYX�RID�D[$8$X��btA3iXR5J $xJ1a=m cxxadaxekepmexk . )fx 1. Rxmkk:kxzik)cxw:kkkxmm:kxwmaxkakxpexmikkiR§j *MxX3MCXXX(K4(X1K!KX . . . . . . . . . . .. Xk g. Accustomed to collaborating with other professions . 2 h. Previous collaboration with the City or other public agencies . 5 i. Previous work with other team members 2 j. Number of years in the profession as an established firm 5 k. Collaboration with the city on current projects . .. . 2 Sub -Total • TEAM ORGANIZATION & COI•L ITMENT a. Headed by principal of Prime Consultant 3 b. Other principals on team . . . . . . 1 c. Key team members present . .. 2 d. Project managers prominence at interview . 1 e. Location of primary work area . 3 Sub -Total • CAPABILITY OF TEAM a. Range of skills provided by Prime Consultant . 5 b. Range of skills provided by Sub -Consultants 5 c. Project manager's professional skills and experience . 4 d. Recent, current and projected work loads of team allow sufficient personnel capacity to undertake and accomplish assignment . . . . . . . . . . . 3 e. Prime and Sub Consultant Firms demonstrate ability to meet schedules. 4 f. Prime & Sub Consultant firms demonstrate ability to work within budget . 4 Sub -Total • AFFIRI.VtTIVE ACTION a. Range of minority participation . . . . 10 Sub -Total TOTAL