HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem #20 - Discussion ItemBi
I CITY OF MIAMI FLORIDA
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TD Honorable Mayor and DATE November 7, 1983 rILE
Members of the City
Commission SL.e:E=- Affirmative Action
Semi -Annual Report
FROM Howard V. Gary REFERENCES
City Manager
h-
ENCLOSUPES
I am pleased to submit the Semi -Annual Affirmative Action Report for
June 1983. The Affirmative Action Plan, Section 13, approved by the
City Commission on January 11, 1978 requires that this report be
forwarded to the City Commission and the Affirmative Action Advisory
Board. This item will be scheduled for discussion at the November 16,
1983 Commission meeting, but I am submitting it to you ahead of time
to permit adequate time for review.
The unique feature of this report is that it gives a ten-year per-_
spective, 1973-83, of the City's efforts in Affirmative Action which
commenced with the Equal Employment Opportunity Act. Statistical
information is provided in the areas of employment, job categories,
salary, hiring and promotion.
The City's commitment to Affirmative Action is demonstrated in the
results of those efforts. Sixty-six per cent of City employees are
minorities and women. Hispanics comprise 30% (1077), Blacks 29%
(1040) and Anglos 40% (1438). Females as a group total 21% (766).
There is every indication that progress has also been made in redis-
tributing minorities throughout all job categories and salary
levels. Ten years ago minorities represented only 8% of the adminis-
tration, 12% of the professional and 15% of the protective service
workers. Today minorities hold a larger share of those jobs at 40%,
49%, and 62%, respectively.
Intense recruitment and hiring has resulted in a police force which
is predominantly minority and female. In 1973 the force included
24% Blacks, Hispanics and women. Today that figure is 60%.' The
composition of uniformed personnel in the Department of Fire re-
flects the equal employment mandate. Twenty-eight per cent of fire
personnel is minority and female compared to a mer five per cent
in 1973.
Disparities among minorities have been substantially mitigated by
the Affirmative Action Program. Since 1979, 83% of all new hires
have been minorities and women. During the past year, minorities
and women represented 87% of new hires; 74% of Police Officers; 76%
of Fire Fighters; 89% of professionals; and 81% of all new executives.
I
Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City
Commission
These are substantial results. They have raised a concern that
perhaps we are moving too fast; perhaps we are developing a staff-
ing pattern that will not be representative of Anglo males in the
labor market.
Anglo males represent 12% of the City labor market and 34% of the
current work force. This is a disparity in favor of Anglo males
that still persists because of earlier patterns of hiring and pro-
motion. The City's career service, especially in the Fire and Police
Departments, will continue to produce a command structure with a dis-
proportionate number of Anglo males.
As the City approaches more closely the long term goal of a represen-
tative work force, progress inevitably will become slower. We are
already beginning to see this phenomenon: Minorities and women in
the City's work force increased by 20% from 1979 to 1981 and only
by eight per cent from 1981 to 1983.
A constant level of achievement produces a decreasing rate of change.
For example, when minorities represented 25% of the City work force,
a hiring rate of 85% and a turnover of 100 employees would have pro-
duced a net gain of 60 minorities and women. When minority employ-
ment reached 65% of the total, the same hiring and turnover would
have produced a net gain of only 20. When minority employment
reaches 85%, the same hiring and turnover will merely maintain the
status quo.
These results reflect the function of a logarithmic curve. The same
amount of change shows a sharp rate of increase in the early years
followed by a gradually decreasing rate of change.
Thus the City is not rushing headlong toward
Anglo males from the work force. The trend
suggests that there will be steady but less
a representative work force.
-2-
the elimination of
of the logarithmic curve
dramatic progress toward
r"''I.MOP•�t7:
SEMI-ANNUAL AFFIRMATIVE ACTION REPORT
JUNE 1983
This year marks a ten year period of compliance with the provisions of the Equal
Employment Opportunity Act of 1972. This Act amended Title VII of the 1964
Civil Rights Act to extend antidiscrimination provisions to state and local
governments. Beginning in 1973 all political jurisdictions with more than 15
employees were required to maintain comprehensive employment records as necessary
to compute the EEO-4 Report.
In 1978 the City Comnission adopted a formal Affirmative Action Plan and assigned
to the Department of Human Resources the responsibility of implementing an Affirma-
tive Action Program. The provisions of the Affirmative Action Plan required the
development of a workforce that is representative of the City's labor market. This
includes a commitment to insure that minorities and women occupy positions repre-
sentative of the labor market in all occupations and pay levels. The overall
purpose of Affinnative Action is to provide fair employment practices for all
employees regardless of race, religion, sex, age or national origin.
This report analyzes employment patterns of women and minorities in the City of
Miami. Statistical data is based on reports prepared by the Department of Computers.
Data is presented for comparison purposes from 1973 to 1983. Emphasis in this
report is placed on 1983 achievement. All profiles analyze the employment status
of women, Blacks and Hispanics.
The standards against which employment participation of women and minorities were
measured were their respective incidences in the City of Miami civilian labor force.
The City of Miami's labor force is 88% minority. Blacks represent 21% , Hispanics
59% and Anglo women 8% . Those figures show an increase in minority and female
participation in the labor market based on 1980 Census figures, Chart I -a.
Total Workforce
The City of Miami's workforce for June 30, 1983 shows 3,580 employees; 66% are
minorities and women. Hispanics comprise 30% (1,077), Blacks 29% (1,040) and
Anglo females another 61 (229). Chart I shows overall changes in the composition
of the City's workforce from 1973 to 1983.
a
4
Figures for Hispanics rose from 4% for males in 1973 to 23% in 1983; for
females there was an increase from 1% to 7%. Thus the combined figure for
Hispanic males and females in the workforce increased from 5% to 30%.
Black employment has shown an overall increase from 24% to 29%. The percentage
of Black males during this ten year period has declined from 22% to 21%. The
number of Black females in the workforce increased from 2% in 1973 to 8% in 1983.
Females as a group increased from 13% in 1973 to 21% in 1983.
Although their numbers have increased dramatically, both women and Hispanics are
still underrepresented relative to their participation in the labor force. The
numbers of Blacks employed exceed their representation in the labor force.
Chart I I indicates the occupational patterns of minorities and women. The
status of minorities and women within job categories improved between 1973 and
1983. In those occupations considered desirable in terms of relatively high pay,
decision making responsibility and chance for advancement minorities and women
earned a greater share.
In 1973, 80% of all Blacks were employed in service maintenance positions. Similarly,
72% of all women were in office/clerical. Hispanics comprised only 4% of those employed
but represented 40% of those in the categories of clerical and maintenance.
Ten years later the employment patterns of minorities and women show a better
distribution throughout all job levels. The percentage of Blacks in service jobs
has declined from 80% to 43%; 70% of the females employed are found in jobs other
than clerical; and the majority of Hispanics (67%) are employed as managers,
professionals, protective service workers and technicians.
Hispanic Employment
0
r
Growth in the employment of Hispanics from 1973 to.1983 was.significant. In 1973
only 183 (5%) of those employed were of Hispanic heritage. By 1983 Hispanics repre-
sented 30% (1077) of those employed as indicates in Chart III.
Parity has been achieved for Hispanics in the areas of office/clerical, and
protective service. They are underutilized in official/administrator, professional,
0 9
skilled craft, service/maintenance and para-professional jobs. Underutilization
indicates the participation of Hispanics by job category in contrast to their
availability in the City's labor force. Hispanic males achieved their greatest
strides in the areas of protective service and skilled craft. Hispanic females
showed the greatest increases in the areas of para-professional from 1% to 17% and
office/clerical from 6% to 34%. Hispanic females account for less than 1% in the
categories protective service, skilled craft and service/maintenance. It is inter-
esting to note that Hispanic females have made their smallest gains in those jobs
where Hispanic males have achieved their greatest progress. Access to these
positions is apparently limited by cultural factors related to sex. Chart IV
shows the representation of Hispanics by job category.
Black Employment
Between 1973 and 1983 the participation rate of Blacks in City government increased
from 814 (24%) to 1,040 (29%). Over the past two years 1981 - 83 the percentage of
Blacks has remained stable at 29%. Blacks' share of employement is above their
incidence in the area's civilian labor force.
Chart V shows Black representation among individual occupational categories.
Black employees increased most in the areas of technical, office/clerical and
skilled craft at 20, 21 and 20 percentage points respectively. Increases also
occurred in the areas of management, professional, protective service and para-
professional. The occupational distribution of Blacks although improved is still
very different from that of Whites. The proportions of Blacks who were managers
14% (19) professionals 12, (61) , technicians 24;:. (101) and protective
were far below those of whites 66%, 60% 48% and 47%
dLC0U it f2. urear JC•. c.f 'hose hll;id l r �Gi)�•�1 t
crio sL h I.-dr'a-professiona?, office/clerical drill ,)e, ertaP
ke•.1! rc �1 r.►. V, ..:.rtl WI 1'61 a;`,ri,lnv
df:h1L'Ye ` P�.: ._ •. i Irl 'tile i L) f�IL*e'IU( 'tLC'L;J,IL
CfW it -!
•iI1C Qf'''�r•t.�c"Jf: (•" i�1•. •� .. t
3i!'.s t); t:1P)r d01111nin.'-1
is 0
and increased their representation as skilled craft workers by 20 percentage points.
Female Employment
Women workers comprised 21 percent (766) of City employees, which is well below
their incidence in the area's civilian labor force (45 percent). The composition
of females by ethnic group includes 229 (6.4%) Anglo, 282 (7.8%) Black and 248
(6.9%) Hispanic. Chart VI graphically illustrates the increase in the number of
women from 434 (13%) in 1973 to 766 (21%) in 1983.
An examination of Chart VI indicates that women have increased both in number
and within individual job categories. Women fared well in two categories: profes-
sional, an increase from 8 to 24 percent; and technical from 9 to 33 percent.
They are underrepresented in the categories of official/administrator, professional,
protective service and skilled craft. Women made the least amount of progress in
the latter two categories representing 7 and 2 percent respectively. Unlike their
male counterparts, women are overrepresented in the clerical field 81% (332) and
para-professional 55010' (51). In 1973 only 2 females(3%)were managers. This year,
1983, the number of female managers is 17 (13%).
Black females tend to accept employment within the traditional male oriented
occupations. They have the highest number and percentages for women within the
job categories of skilled craft 2% (3), and service/maintenance 3% (19). In
contrast, Hispanic women represent less than one percent i-n each of these categories.
Minority females, Black and Hispanic, represent 64 percent of the clerical personnel.
The occupational distribution of Anglo females show that a higher proportion (63%)
are employed as managers, professional, technicians and protective service workers.
New Hires
The change in the Civil Service Rules is recognized as being the catalyst for our
achievement in Affirmative Action. Chart VII reflects the effective period of
the new rules August 24, 1979 through June 30, 1983. That report shows:
��
0
1. 83% of all new hires have been women and minorities. Of 1,836 hired,
354 (19%) were Black males, 628 (34%) Hispanic males and 534 (29%)
females.
2. 79% of all promotions have been women and minorities; which exceeds
their representation in the City's workforce.
From July 1982 to June 1983, 397 new employees were hired of which 345 (87%)
were minorities and females. The distribution of those hired is reflected in
Chart VIII which shows 156 (39%) females, 84 (21%) Black males, and 105 (26%)
Hispanic males.
Of 11 new hires in the category of official/administrator, 81% were minorities
and women: 3 (27%) were females; 5 (45%) Black males; and 1 (9%) Hispanic males.
Eighty nine (891) of the professionals hired were minorities and females. The
area of protective service included 21 (17%) females, 18 (14%) Black males and
59 (46%) Hispanic males.
The greatest proportion of women were hired as office/clerical (66%). Fifty
per cent (50%) of Black males hired were in the category of service/maintenance.
Fifty-six per cent (56%) of Hispanic males were hired as protective service
workers. These figures indicate that traditional patterns of employment are
slow to change especially for women. They also indicate that the largest numbers
of City jobs are in office/clerical, service/maintenance and protective service
work.
Salary
Chart IX reflects minority and female representation by salary brackets. There
were 435 individuals in the salary range of $35,000 and above, 75% of which were
white males and 25% minority males and women.
Minorities and women doubled their numbers from 50 (20%) in 1982 to 110 (25%) in
1983.
Of 1,042 employees earning between $25,000 - $35,000, white males held a dispropor-
tionate share at sixty one percent (61%). Minorities and women represented 39% of
this group which included 12%* Blacks, 20% Hispanic and 11% female. Individual
statistics by race and sex are shown in Chart X
* F'oure for Black and lii,;psnic include both male and female.
0
In the salary range below $25,000 minority and female representation increased
inversely as salaries declined. They represent 88% compared to 25% and 39% in
the higher salary brackets. There were 879 (421%) Blacks, 816 (39%) Hispanics
and 623 (30%) females.
The majority of white males (81%) earn more than $25,000. The majority of
minority males and females (78%) earn less than $25,000. Likewise 81% of females
compared to 52% of males earn less than $25,000.
The disparity in salary between white males and minorities and between men and
women can be attributed to seniority and the difference in occupational positions
held. While employment patterns have been changing, the City's career service
continues to include significant numbers of Anglo males who have advanced to
supervisory and managerial levels.
Protective Service Employment Statistics_
The history of Affirmative Action in the City of Miami has been marked by efforts
to achieve a tri-ethnic representation of employees in the protective service
area, Fire and Police. The City's diligience in minority recruitment and hiring
has resulted in a police force which is 60% minority and female compared to 24w
ten years ago. Hispanics account for 39%, Blacks 16%, and Women 9p. These
statistics are reflected in Chart XI
Ten years ago less than 50 minorities were employed as fire personnel. Today
minorities and women represent 28% (174); Blacks 55 (9%); Hispanics 115 (18%);
and 4 (.6%) females. These statistics are illustrated in Chart xII .
CHART I
TOTAL EMPLOYMENT, 1973 - 1983
YEAR
1973
TOTAL
UV LOTEES
3433
2429
ANGLO
%
71%
814
BLACK
%
24%
183
HISPANIC
%
5%
TOTAL
MINORITIES
WOMEN
1348
AND
39%
1975
3936
2543
64%
990
25%
392
10%
1789
45%
1977
3476
2151
62%
910
26%
411
12%
1667
48%
1979
3080
1765
58%
854
28%
452
15%
1577
51%
1981
3310
1527
46%
947
29%
820
25%
2007
61%
1982
3503
1484
42%
1006
29%
992
28%
2224
�j
63a
1983
3580
1438
40%
1040
29%
1077
294
2346
66%
* Total excludes the category of Other
00
0}
a a
CHART I -a
CIVILIAN WORKFORCE
1980 Census
Anglo - 14,057 8$
Females '^' Black - 17,505 10.3% / Total 78,016
45.5!
Hispanic - 45,664 27%
Ang to
Males Females
18,065 11% 14,057 8%
N'... 32,122 19%
Black
Males
18,497 11%
36,002
Hispanic
Females
17,505 10%
21%
Males Females
54,283 328 45,664 27�
� 99,947 598 '�
TOTAL MALES- 91,617 54%
Chart 1-a (continued)
WORK FORCE UTILIZATION
City
Labor Market
Workforce
Officials/
knack
78
151
+
Administrators
hispanic
56t
16%
-
Females Only
32%
13%
-
Professionals
Black
16%
12*
-
Hispanic
44%
251
-
F'emales Only
49%
244
-
Technicians
Black
18i
244
+
Hispanic
53%
274
-
Females Only
44%
33%
-
Protective Service
Black
21%
15%
-
Hispanic
51d
3614
-
Females Only
12%
7%
-
Paraprofessionals
Black
NA
30
lispanic
Combined with
32
Females Only
Clerical
55
Office/Clerical
Black
17%
32%
+
Hispanic
60%
45%
-
Females Only
70 %
81
+
Skilled Craft
Black
17%
28%
+
Hispanic
68%
38%
-
Females Only
lye
2%
-
Service/ Maintenance
Black
354
79%
+
Hispanic
528
late
-
FL:mdles Only
44%
34
-
CHAPT II
SEX k%;'- RACE
YEAR
TO:AL
OFF ADMIN.
PAvFESSIC%A.L
TECHNICIAN
PROTECTIVE
SERVICE
FARA-
FRCFLSSIJUIL
OFFICE/
CLERICAL
SKILLED
CRAFT
SERVICE
MAISTEt4dCE
Ttcal N•.mber
1913
3433
61
222
498
1072
99
406
164
921
1963
3560
00
498
425
1275
93
408
172
579
!ter.
1973
97%
971
921
91%
9'1
791
23%
100%
990
1963
79%
8'
761
67t
931
451
15%
96%
911
1.0[.en
1973
13%
3%
at
9%
3%
22%
771
0
it
1563
21%
13
241
33t
7%
55%
Bit
2%
39
Black
Mere
1973
22%
2%
.2t
31
61
121
3%
71
694
1963
21t
111
7%
ilt
129
13•
at
27%
76%
worsen
1973
2♦
0
.2%
.41
.4%
5%
9%
0
St
3t
19b3
8t
3t
:t
1:t
3%
171
30%
1t
Frspar.i-
her. 1973
4%
3%
4%
4%
S4
2%
7♦
St
1963
23t
14%
17%
16t
36%
154
11%
38�
12%
biomen 1973
It
0
.2%
et
0
It
6%
0
0
1SB3
7t
2%
9%
8t
7t
17%
34%
.6t
.1t
00
op
EMPLOYMENT DATA AS OF __ JUNE 30, 1983
JOB CATEGORIES
TOTAL
ca�....s„
49
•
saw
FEMALE
TOTAL
"oaf w50•pac
DRIGve
.6w^mc
O
.s+u.
On
••cc
w
IS4-AftW
E
•hWftCAft wouw
ALASN .
ftaI'm
MpM.MlspajoC
ONIGN
..ssu.0
nfuue
. �
>p�+iooi
urE+Ecww
`a•01
& an
.u►rfvE
i
i
Fpi/W
""m
INLA"
c
�E
G
aKa
�. OFFIC;ALS/
ADMINISTRATORS
'
130
78
14
18
3
8
5
4
+
113
17
x
6 0.48
10. 8%
13.9%
2. 3t
6%
3. 8%
31
0
871
12'.4
. PROFESSIONALS
498
256
35
84
6
46
26
42
3
391
117
x
51%
7.9%
16.8%
1.2%
9.21
5.21
8.6 !
.6%
76-31
23.6
TECwtiICIA%S
'
425
162
48
78
1
47
53
35
1
296
139
i
38%
11.2%
18.3%
.2%
111
12.4%
8.2%
.21
6?4
33%
PROTECTIVE SEF0-ICE
1275
572
153
1 456
3
39
42
1 10
0
1134
91
i
44.8%
12It
"35.73
.21
3%
33
.7%
0
33;
71
PAR;.'gCFESS:CtiALS
'
93
14
12
14
2
19
16
16
0
42
51
%
15it
131
15T
2.11
204
17%
171
0
451
554
F. CFFjCE CLERICAL
438
20
11
44
1
69
121
139
3
'6
332
x
4.91
2.7%
10.8%
.2%
16.9
29.61
34%
.7%
19%
81%
SKILLED CRAFT
'
172
56
47
65
I
1
0
2
1
0
169
1 3
32.5%
271
37.81
.6%
0
1.10
.61
0
98%
21
H. SERVICEIMAINTENANCE
•
579
51
438
70
1
1
17
1
0
560
19
x
8.8%
79.61
12%
.11
.11
31
.1%
0
972
31
SPECIAL EVENTS 6
PART TIME
•
x
s
x
TOTALS
0
3580
1209
758
829
18
229
282
248
7
2814
766
x
33.7*1
211
230
.51
6.41
7.8%
6.9%
.2%
78.61
21.3
•
x
t 00
1
11
CHART IV
HISPANIC EMPLOYMENT BY JOB CATEGGRIES
1973 1977 1981 1983
:, OB CATEGOP T ES
t
#
t
i
t
1
t
A. Officials/
A--2-u nistrators
2
3%
10
10%
26
20%
22
16%
B. Professionals
10
4%
31
9%
63
16%
126
25%
C. Tec}.nicians
22
5%
44
14%
74
25%
113
26.5%
D. Protective Service
57
5%
123
11%
336
28%
466
36%
E. Paraprofessicnal
4
4%
25
21%
20
29%
30
32%
F. Gffice/Cleric3l
35
88
84
18%
175
38%
183
45%
G. Skilled Craft
11
7_
35
12%
65
26%
66
38%
H. Service/maintenance
42
5%
59
8%
60
12.2%
71
12%
TOTAL
183
5%
411
12t
820
25%
1077
30%
El
0
CHART V
BI.,ACR EMPLOYMENT BY JOB CATEGORIES
1473
1977
1981
1983
JOB CATEGGRIES
i
i
A.
Officials)
12-ir.istrat=: s
1
2%
s
5%
14
11%
19
14%
B.
professionals
2
.48
21
5%
43
11%
61
12%
C.
Technicians
19
34
22
7.2%
41
14P�
141
24%
D.
Pzotective Service
73
6%
94
89
184
15!
195
15%
E.
Paraprofessional
47
17%
39
33$
21
319
28
30%
r
Grf.ce/Cler1c31
46
12%
86
182
133
283
132
32%
G.
Skilled Craft
113
7%
104
34�!
113
458
49
28$
H. ServiceiMyinter.a:ice
645
70%
539
77%
398
76'!
455
79%
TOTAL
814
24%
910
268
947
29t
1040
.294
Ij
[A
JOB CATEGORIES
A. Officials/
Ad7d nistrators
B. Profession3ls
C. Tecrnicians
O. Protective Service
E. Paraorofession3l
F. c`fice/Clerical
G. Skilled Craft
H. Service/Maintenance
TOTAL
CHART VI
FEMALE EMPLCYME%T BY JOB CATEGORIES
1973
2
3%
7
17
8%,
48
44
9%
12
32
3%
64
22
22%
48
312
77%
367
0
0
1
5
11
10
434
13%
I 557
1981
1983
77
e
#
;
7%
18
14%
17
13%
13%
79
20%
117
24%
44
24
8%
139
33%
48
93
8%
91
78
41%
36
53%
51
55%
19g
382
82%
332
81%
,3g
1
.4%
3
2%
1%
15
38
19
3%
168
648
20%
766
21%
E
Totals
Totals
0 0
CHART VII
HIRING & PROMOTION UNDER NEW CIVIL SERVICE RULES
August 24, 1979 - June 30, 1983
NEW HIRES
Anglo Black flispanic Other
M F M F M F M F
316 116 354 240 628 176 4 2
�43211.� N%594� �804 loe \ 6'r
PERCENTAGES
Anglo Black Hispanic Other
M F M F M F M F
17 6 19 13 34 10 .2 .1
N239I'll 32% / 44%/ \.31/
PROMOTIONS
Anglo,
Black
Hispanic
Other
M F
M F
M F
M F
242 114
235 184
227 155
1 1
�356�
�419�
�382�
�2'�
PERCENTAGES
Anglo
Black
Ilispanic
Other
M t,
M F
M F
M 1'
21 10
20 16
20 13
.09 .09
31%
36%
33%
.18%
CHART IX
MINORITY REPRESENTATION BY SALARY BRACKETS
$35,000
- Above
(435)
Total
Minorities
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
and
Women
M
F
M
Ill
(25.4%)
327
19
31
4
46 8
3 0
343
35
88
54
12.4%
3
.7%
79%
$25,000 -
$35,000
(1042)
Total
Minorities
Anclo
Black
Hispanic F
M Other F
and
women
M
r
—
M
F
—
M
405
(39%)
637
61
100
27
185 22
8 2
698
127
207
10
1%
66.8%
12%
19.8%
$25,000
- Below
(2103)
Total
Minorities
An to
Black
M Hispanic
F
other
M F
and
Women
M
F
247
149
628
251
598 218
7 5
1856
(8816)
879
816
12
396
19%
42%
39%
.5%
0
0
L i Irsllll A
DEPARTMENT City --wide By Salary Brackets
EMPLOYMENT DATA AS OF June 30, 1983
ANNUAL SALARY
TOTAL
t�. ,..rs
sR
a
MALE
FEMALE
TOTAL
NOti •itG'% C
OAi�I'�I
wspa%-c
•s.&%
ON
�A:I
1S11+DE•
•YE R1C AA
r+D1Ati
on
•-'S.AN
A�'•YE
E�Ow tGlh K
D10Gi'
M1SOANIC
• Aft
Do
r.:*1c
1S.A%:A•
Monica"
E�.o1AN
On
A.•S..w
1� T1vE
O14t
Rrr.E
W."TE
a
ElIA:•
[
0►111
Rflc
AC[
75,000 - Above
4
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
50%
25%
25%
0
0
0
0
0
100%
0
70,000 - 74,999
6
4
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
66%
16.9%
16.9%
0
0
0
0
0
100%
0
65,000 - 69,999
i
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
x
loolk
p
0
0
0
0
0
0
linns
0
60,000 - 64,999
21
11
2
3
3
2
0
0
0
14
2
52%
10%
14%
14%
10%
0
1 0
0
90%
10%
55,000 - 59,999
5
a
1
0
0
0
0
0
o
s
o
%
80%
20%
0
0
0
0
0
0
1008
0
50,000 - 54,999
23
17
2
2
0
0
0
2
0
21
2
73%
9%
98
0
0
0
9%
0
91%
9%
45,000 - 49,999
66
51
2
6
0
3
3
1
0
59
7
w
77%
38
9%
0
5%
5%
1%
0
89%
11%
40,000 - 44,999
•
91
68
6
9
0
5
1
2
0
83
8
w
75%
7%
10%
0
5%
1%
28
0
91%
9%
35,000 - 39,999
216
164
16
24
0
9
0
3
0
204
12
76i
74
lit
0
4%
0
14
0
94%
6%
30,000 - 34,999
415
291
31
55
4
17
10
6
1
381
34
70%
74
13%
.9%
4%
2%
1!
1.2%
92%
8%
25,000 - 29,999
6
627
346
69
130
4
44
17
16
1
549
78
551
11%
21%
.6%
78
38
3%
.1%
88i
12*
Ll
L3
City wide By
Salary
Bracket
DEPARTMENT
EMPLOYMENT DATA AS OF
June
30
1983
FEMALE
TOTAL
MALE
.Mlbc..h
NON MISrAN1c
As"
.y(bc.N
NG.Y
"At,
'E"Aa
TOTAL
NON-spaft-c
O41G�N
.VAN
OR
«�'�
on-G.
Qr
r.o�,c
ON
A.A'T
SALARY
ca.••Ys
, ,n
�.c.
..sr.N2
i.ci..c
At. S. .w
a.cA
.�eSr.Y,:
5..��E.
NAn.1
a
ANNUAL
�
c
G
E
,
G N
42 62
1
48
J
2
980
204
•
1184
201
325
450
4
54
4%
.1%
83$
17d
20,000 —
24,999
*
17%
27%
38%
.3%
88
455
296
751
41
289
122
3
45 136
112
3
6g 188
154
.38
618
39s
15,000 —
19,999
%
5%
384
16%
.3%
0
4l
115
156
3
12
26
0
10 48
57
0
268
74�
10,000
— 14.999
28
8t
17%
0
6g 316
36B
%
5,000
— 9,999
•
5
0
0
0
0
p
p
408 608
0
0
0
100%
x
0
0 2
1
0
4
3
7
2
2
0
0
0 28.5%
14%
0
57$
438
4,999
— 0
,�
28.58
28.59
0
0
TOTALS
33.78 21.21s 23% 6.48 7.86 6.48 .28 78.68 21.4%
CHART XI
COMPARISON OF POLICE SWORN PERSONNEL 1977 TO 1982
TOTAL
ANGLO
BLACK
HISPANIC
TOTAL
YEAR
EMPLOYEES
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
1977
726
506
32
71
11
102
3
680
46
69.6%
4.4%
9.7%
1.5%
14%
.4Z
93.6%
6.4%
1978
687
470
32
70
11
100
3
641
46
68.5%
4.6%
10%
1.6%
14.6%
.4%
93%
l%
1979
636
419
29
66
15
102
4
588
48
65.8%
4.5%
10.3%
1.3%
16%
.6%
92.4%
7.6%
1980
610
384
30
63
15
112
5
560
50
63%
5%
10%
2.5%
18%
.8%
91.8%
8.2%
1981
865
391
39
115
28
278
12
786
79
45.2%
4.51
13.2%
3.2%
32.1%
1.3%
90.8%
9.11
1982
682
395
40
116
28
295
8
806
76
451
5%
13%
3%
33%
It
91%
91
402
48
126
40
386
10
914
98
1983
1012
401
4%
12%
4%
38%
it
90%
101
0
0
CHART XII
COMPARISON OF FIRE DEPARTMENT UNIFORM PERSONNEL 1977 TO 1983
T OTAL
ANGLO
BACK
MISFANIC
TOTAL
YEAR
EMPLOYEES
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
F
585
0
10
0
48
0
643
0
1977
643
91%
0
1.5%
0
7.4%
0
100%
0
563
0
16
0
54
0
633
0
1978
633
89%
0
2.5%
0
8.5%
0
100%
0
541
0
21
0
62
0
624
0
1979
624
86.6%
0
3.4%
9.9%
0
100%
0
1980
625
521
1
33
0
70
0
624
1
83%
.2%
5.3%
0
11%
0
99.3%
.7%
1981
640
495
3
46
0
96
0
492
3
77.3%
.5%
7.1%
0
15%
0
98.0
1.6%
473
5
50
0
103
0
627
5
1982
632
75%
.7%
8%
0
16%
0
99
1%
461
4
55
0
115
0
631
4
1983
635
72%
.6
9%
0
18%
0
99
1%
0
CHFJ:T VIII
DEPARTMENT AI.L DEPAP.TMENTS MONTH JULY - JUNE _ YEAR 1982 - 1983
TOTAL i OF ACHIEVE -
JOB TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL MINORITIES t MENT
ANGLn MALE FEMALES BLACK MALE LATIN MALE HIRED WOMEN GOAL TO DATE
!
i
!
i
!
i
1
i
!
t
!
•
FFICIAL t ADMINISTRATOR
*
20i
ROFESSI04AL
1$
1
30t
Ra
ECVNICIAN
7
32%
5
234
4
1B$
6
1 27%
22
100
15
68%
30$
ROTECTIVE SERVICES
29
23$
21
17J
1
56VA
77 y;
PARAPROFESSIONALS
1
9%
5
45
2
18%
3
27%
11
100 10
1%
40g
FFICE/CLERICAL
1
SKILLED CRAFT WORKERS
5*
29%
3
18$
9
53%
17
10 112
71$
501A
SERVICE MAINTENANCE
]:S2*
--4-9 $--
roTAL
r13
156
39
84
21$
OS
6
3 7
!10 4
7
TOTAL • OF ACHIEVE -
JOB TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL. TOTAL TOTAL MINORITIES t RENT
r.%mv ^nnv ANGLO MALE FEMALES BLACK MALE LATIN MALE PROMOTFD WOMEN GOAL TO DATE
OFFICIAL i ADMINISTRATOR
7
7
1
PROFESSIONAL
24*
38$
11
17
8
13%
21
4
100
40
63%
TECHNICIAN
19
37%
8
16
9
18%
15
29%
51
100
32
63$
PROTECTIVE SERVICES
3
7
1
100
11
1 0$
PARAPROFESSIONALS
9
75
2
17%
1
12
100
12
100$
rFICE/CLERICAL
67
7
$
SKILLED CRAFT WORKERS
17$
1
ERVICE MAINTENANCE
T4L
51*
20p
99
39
47
18
59
23$
256
100
205
BO$
58 %
80 $
40