Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutM-84-0035AGREEMENT FOR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEN=-�+ -� a its 22 TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO THE PORT OF MIAMI THIS AGREEMENT FOR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO THE PORT OF MIAMI , made and entered into this day of January, 1984, by and between Dade County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as the "COUNTY", and the City of Miami, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as the "CITY". W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS, the COUNTY has by Resolution No. R-118-83 approved a Three -Phase Concept Transportation Improvement Plan for Port Access at the Port of Miami, incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, the CITY is interested in entering. into an agreement for a Three -Phase Concept Transportation Improvement Play;; and WHEREAS, the CITY owns in fee simple absolute certain land and air -rights required by the COUNTY for right-of-way; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY is desirous of obtaining certain City -owned land and air -rights for right-of-way, NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF the mutual premises and covenants hereinafter set forth, it is understood and agreed as follows: 1, The Transportation Improvement Plan shall consist of the following: Mor1p1v 84-35 Phase I EXISTING STREET IMPROVEMENTS (1984-1985) ° Remove parking on sections of 5th and 6th Streets, to provide three lames in each direction. ° Intersection improvements onto 5th and 6th Streets from N.E. 1st and 2nd Avenues. Phase 11 BRIDGE AND RAMP CONSTRUCTION (1984-1986) ° Widen eastbound SR-836 ramp to southbound I-95 ramp to accommodate a new access ramp from SR-836 to the southbound I-95 off -ramp to NW 8th Street. Access to the ramp will be provided by either reversing the exisiting traffic flow on NW loth Street or.by making the street two-way from NW 3rd Avenue to the ramp. ° Construct a new five -lane high level (65 feet clearance) bridge connecting the Port to Biscayne Boulevard. Four driving lanes and an additional lane to accommodate the Metro -Mover Guideway. Phase III TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION It is the intention of the CITY and the COUNTY that a commitment shall be made to construct the Phase III four -lane tunnel from the Port of Miami to I-395. The agreed alignment extends westerly under the Intracoastal Waterway; north, -2- 84-35 just inside the bulkhead line of the former F.E.C. property and Bicentennial Park; westerly, in tunnel, under and tied into 1-395. 2. In consideration of the commitment for the Phase III four -lane tunnel, the COUNTY will establish the Port of Miami Tunnel Fund to be used for the local match for Federal or State funding of the tunnel project. Funds contributed annually, by the COUNTY, will accrue, with interest, in the Port of Miami Tunnel Fund. The contribution will be budgeted annually from the Seaport General Fund subject to debt coverage requirements as specified under Dade County Ordinance No. 78-33 as revised or amended. The following amounts represent the COUNTY'S annual contribution to the Port of Miami Tunnel Fund: $ 500,000 FY 84 200,000 85 300,000 86 500,000 87 600,000 88 700,000 89 500,000 each year thereafter through 1995 - In the event that the tunnel construction does not commence within twelve years of the date of the Agreement, the funds in the Port of Miami Tunnel Fund shall be used for either capital projects or capital equipment included within City of Miami transportation improvement plans in the downtown Miami area to be agreed jointly by the CITY and the COUNTY. -3- 84-35. 3. The COUNTY shall immediately determine potential means, to fund the Phase III tunnel. It is recognized by both the CITY and the COUNTY that a Consultant has been retained, by the COUNTY, to seek Federal and/or State funding and the CITY shall cooperate with the COUNTY in obtaining such funding. Additionally, the Consultant shall attempt to obtain Interstate or State Road designation to reduce the local share in any final funding package and the CITY shall cooperate in the seeking of such designation. 4. The new sixty-five foot high-level bridge (Phase II) shall be designed to accommodate four lanes of vehicular traffic and the necessary right-of-way needed for construction of the guideway element of the Metro -Mover; the guideway shall be constructed as part of the bridge. 5. The point at which the westerly ramp of the. Phase II bridge reaches grade will be established by the CITY and the COUNTY following a joint analysis by the CITY'S Bayside Consultants and the COUNTY'S bridge Consultants of all factors related to improving transportation in the area and providing adequate access to the proposed Bayside Specialty Center. The preferred alternative, is for the ramp to begin its ascent east of the intersection of Miamarina Parkway Drive and Port Boulevard unless otherwise determined by both the CITY'S and the COUNTY'S consultants. 6. The COUNTY shall design and construct a Baywalk in accordance with the CITY codes, commencing north of the new bridge running south then east to west parallel to Port Boulevard. -4- 84-35 4 7. The CITY and COUNTY Managers will appoint a joint task force to oversee the design and construction of the Phase II and Phase III improvements. The task force will be charged with the responsibility of ensuring an aesthetically pleasing design for the bridge structure and its approaches. The task force shall determine the limits of the landscaping and improvements to the 5th and 6th Street corridor, and their relationship to the proposed Bayside Specialty Center. A nationally recognized architectural consultant licensed to do business in the State of Florida will be commissioned by the Consultant to review concepts with the bridge and tunnel engineers and to assist the task force in their deliberations. 8. All programs included in this plan shall satisfy the Development Order and will become part of the County's Transportation Master Plan. 9. The CITY shall support and cooperate with all efforts by the COUNTY to seek permits and/or other necessary documentation needed for the implementation of the program, included within this agreement, from other governmental agencies and third parties, and the CITY will withdraw their objections on the 4(F) statement now before the Coast Guard. 10. The COUNTY shall obtain from the CITY that portion of City -owned land and air -rights, outside the present easement (Exhibit 1 ] required for new construction and the COUNTY agrees to compensate the CITY for the additional right-of-way and air -rights at fair market value. To determine fair market value, both the CITY and the COUNTY shall seek the services of an individual designated as M.A.I. ( American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers) and duly certified to perform -5- 84-35 01 such services in the State of Florida. In the event that the appraisals obtained by the CITY and the COUNTY, respectively, are within less than 10% of each other, then an average of the two appraisals shall be accepted as the agreed value. In the event that the appraisals obtained by the CITY and the COUNTY, respectively, are greater than 10% of each other, both the CITY and the COUNTY shall jointly select a third appraiser, from a mutually agreed upon list of M.A.I.s, to obtain a third appraisal, whereupon the high and low appraisals shall be disregarded and the remaining appraisal shall be accepted as the agreed value. Upon request, the CITY shall provide the COUNTY with a temporary construction easement for the Phase H bridge and approaches. 11. One year following completion of the proj%ct, the COUNTY and CITY shall determine if any compensation is to be considered resulting from the impact of Port bridge construction on the CITY, lessees' and contractors' revenues at the Miamarina. -6- 84-35 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this instrument to -be executed by their respective officials thereunto duly authorized this day of January, 1994. (OFFICIAL SEAL) ATTEST: RICHARD P. BRINKER, CLERK By: Deputy Cleric (OFFICIAL SEAL) ATTEST: By: City Clerk DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY ITS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS By: M . R . Stierheim County Manager THE CITY OF MIAMI, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida By: Howard Gary City Manager Authorized by City of Miami Resolution No. Authorized by Dade County Resolution No. Approved by County Attorney as to form and legal sufficiency Approved by City Attorney as to form and legal sufficiency -7- 84-35 0 . i ► MEMORANDUM '.07-17A TO Honorable Mayor and Members DATE July 28, 1983 Board of County Commissioners FROM M. R. Stierheim County Manager RECOMMENDATION SUBJECT Summary Evaluation Three Phase Concept Plan for Port Access at the Port of Miami The Port of Miami is currently in the process of a major expansion and an essential element of that program is the overall transportation plan for the present and future traffic needs for the Seaport and its relationship to the Downtown area. The Dade County Transportation Planning Council (TPC) on October 13, 1981 established a Task Force, represented by technical staff from the City of Miami, the Downtown Development Authority and the State of Florida Department of Transportation, to develop a Port Access Concept Plan. Based upon their reviews with the Dade County Transportation Committee, the Task Force recommends a three phase concept plan (Port of Miami Proposed Implementation Schedule attached Exhibit 1) as follows: Phase I Phase I includes the improvements to intersections and streets now used by traffic coming to and from the Port. These improvements will primarily be in the 5th Street, 6th Street, 1st Avenue and 2nd Avenue corridors. Phase I also includes the removal of parking along 6th Street and a part of 5th Street and Biscayne Boulevard and entails the redesign of several intersections to increase capacity for Port traffic. This phase should be implemented during 1983 and 1984. Phase II Early in review, it was obvious that the most feasible immediate solution would be the construction of a high level bridge across the Intracoastal Waterway connecting to Biscayne Boulevard. This would provide adequate traffic capacity until 1995 and, by that time, the long range Phase III could be implemented at which time the bridge would remain to serve local traffic. In 1982, through the efforts of Senator Lawton Chiles and Congressman William Lehman, Congress appropriated $23 million for the construction of the bridge and the Coast Guard was designated as the lead agency in the planning process. Phase II would be composed of two components: 1) Construction of a new high-level bridge over the Intracoastal Waterway between Dodge Island and Biscayne Boulevard with an at -grade intersection at Biscayne Boulevard (Exhibit 2). In order to accomplish the construction of the bridge under this phase, the County must obtain a small section of right-of-way from the City of Miami. 2) Construction of new ramps on I-95 to provide additional access to and from the west on SR 836 from NW 5th and 6th Streets (Exhibit 2A). These ramps have been recommended in a number of other studies, including -the Downtown Mobility and Access Study and the DuPont Plaza Analysis, and any modification made to the DuPont Plaza ramps would be directly related to completion of these ramps, which will not only improve Port access but will definitely help the Central Business Disctrict (CBD) and the government center and Overtown areas, The Port has committed half a million 84-35 46 Phase II (Continued) Page 2 dollars of Seaport funds for the design of these ramps in order to expedite their construction.The design alternatives have already been presented to the Florida Department of Transportation for their review, and construction funds for these proposed ramps have been committed by the Florida Department of Transportation from the Interstate Reconstruction, Resurfacing and Repair Fund, which is 90% paid by the federal government and 10% by the state. Had the Seaport not extended this money, construction of these ramps would have been delayed approximately two years. Phase III Phase III will consist of one of the following alternatives: 1. Construction of a tunnel from the Port of Miami to Watson Island (Exhibit 3). 2. Construction of a ramp/tunnel system adjacent to Biscayne Boulevard to the west of Bicentennial Park connecting to I-395 (Exhibit 4). 3. Construction of an extended tunnel system under the Intracoastal Waterway parallel to the FEC property and Bicentennial Park with an elevated roadway connecting to I-395 (Exhibit 5). While all of the proposed Phase III alternatives connect Port traffic to one of the interstate systems, providing a balanced transportation network for the Seaport and the Downtown area, the cost in each case will exceed $100 million. Seaport Director, Carmen J. Lunetta, and I recommend Alternative 3. These recommendations for Phase III were presented to the Dade County Transportation Committee on July 14, 1983, and after consideration and debate the consensus of the Committee was that Alternative 3, a tunnel section from the Port of Miami to I-395 along the waterfront of the FEC property and Bicentennial Park, was the preferred alignment of the three alternatives. The estimated construction cost of Alternate 3 is $128 million, as determined by the tunnel feasibility study by Singstad, Hurka & Associates, P.C. It is our hope that the City of Miami will join with D.D.A. and the New World Center Action Committee in a unified effort to seek necessary federal funding for Alternative 3, as this alternative is in the best interest of the City of Miami. During the period that federal transportation dollars are being sought for the tunnel alternative, a Transportation Improvement Fund will be established and -funded by the Seaport for all local costs. Implementation of any of the alternatives listed in the three phase program will require that certain rights -of -way be obtained from the City of Miami. BACKGROUND Because of the complexity of the alternatives and the variety of agencies involved, the TPC, acting as the coordinating body for countywide transportation projects, accepted the leadership role in coordinating the process of access alternative review and plan selection. On October 13, 1981, the TPC established the Port Access Task Force. The Ta3k Force, working closely with the Seaport Department and its consultant, adopted the following objectives at its first meeting on December 16, 1981: Access to Dodge Island should be improved to satisfy current and future needs. 84-35 Page 3 BACKGROUND (Continued) ° A plan for meeting the growing access needs of the Seaport should be implemented in stages. ° Traffic accessing the Seaport should be diverted from local streets in the Central Business District. ° Traffic flows serving the Seaport should be harmonized with the Park West Plan/Overtown. ° Air quality in the CBD should be improved by eliminating impediments to the movement of traffic accessing the Seaport. Access proposals shall be compatible with Bayfront Park/ Bicentennial Park Plans. The objectives recognize the importance of meeting Seaport access needs by phasing improvements. The phasing concept plan recommended by the Task Force is an outgrowth of an extensive analysis of alternatives carried out by the Seaport's consultant. I-95 Improvements One alternative for providing freeway access is to improve the existing I-95 freeway (see Figure 10). The I-95 improvements will be required if access is provided to and from the Port via the existing N 5th and 6th Street corridor. They are also highly desirable to provide additional access into the Miami CBD, the expanding Government Center, and the Park West development. The existing northbound on -ramp to I-95 from NW 3rd Avenue now has a 13-foot 9-inch clearance, which is restrictive for many trucks. Increasing the verticle clearance of this ramp will provide access to north I-95 for trucks requiring the increased height. This ramp provides access to northbound I-95, but does not allow vehicles to access westbound SR 836. vehicles may travel west on SR-112 approximately three miles to the north; but SR-112 terminates east of Miami International Airport without providing good access with the Palmetto Expressway and industrial areas further west. The interchange of I-95 and SR-836 does not allow access to and from the west via the existing interchange of I-95 with NE 5th and 6th Streets; but preliminary investigation indicates that these traffic movements could be provided. The eastbound SR-836 to southbound I-95 ramp can be widened to accommodate a new access ramp from SR 836 to the southbound I-95 off -ramp to NW 8th Street. The new ramp will provide access to Miami for traffic that now must travel from I-395 to NE Ist Avenue or Biscayne Boulevard, or travel south on I-95 and into the DuPont Plaza via the I-95 connector. The traffic flow from Miami to westbound SR-836 can use the new proposed ramp from NW 10 Street and merge with the northbound I-95 ramp to westbound SR-836. Access to the ramp will be provided by either reversing the existing traffic flow on NW loth Street or by making the street two-way from NW 3rd Avenue to the ramp. With this new ramp, NW llth Street will have to be closed under the I-95 Expressway or height clearances will have to be restricted. The new ramp will have the required elevation to clear the Dade County Rapid Transportation System of NW loth Street. The estimated cost of constructing the improvements required for I-95 is approximately $5 million. Subsequent to the recommendation and approval by the Dade County Transportation Committee, the Task Force was again recalled to evaluate and define the third and last phase, so as to avoid future traffic congestion for lack of an approved plan. 84-35 tFAV- 1'i .h r 'r.*"".W1"'0.. n Page 4 BACKGROUND (Continued) This third phase should comply with the following guidelines: Provide a direct tie to the expressway system. ° Minimize any land taking. ° Utilize least valuable properties along the proposed alignment. ° Utilize boundary corridors along the Bayfront Park/ Bicentennial Park, Park West/Overtown, and Government Center project boundaries. ° Provide more than one point of access to the Seaport. ° Avoid any use of the Overtown area. ° Minimize impacts on major proposed announced projects such as the Downtown Component of Metrorail (DCM), Downtown Arena, Freedom Tower, and others. A considerable amount of time was spent in developing Phase III, with the Downtown Development Authority, the Miami Chamber of Commerce New World Center Action Committee, and the State of Florida Department of Transportation, which culminated with the Task Force, on July 11, 1983, identifying and recommending Phase III, as previously described. CONCLUSION In consideration of the materials presented at this time, the Seaport Director, our consultants and I believe that the results recommended are in the best interest of the Seaport and the entire community. It is recognized that to accomplish the construction of the bridge, a section of what is known as the FEC parcel will be required. The City of Miami has reserved this parcel as future right-of-way and will eventually rezone from its commercial status to accomplish the same. 84-� % %% • WLl- PORT OF MIAMI ACCESS PROPOSED IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE PHASE RESPONSIBLE AGENCY 1982 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 2000, PLANNING SEAPORT/TASK FORCE PHASE i - IMPROVEMENTS TO FUNDING SEAPORT INTERSECTIONS EXISTING DESIGN SEAPORT STREETS _ IMPLEMENT SEAPORT PLANNING SEAPORT/TASK FORCE FUNDING SEAPORT/FDOT/DOT ' PHASE IIA NEW BRIDGE DESIGN SEAPORT AND APPROACHES IMPLEMENT SEAPORT/FDOT PLANNING SEAPORT/TASK FORCE rit. PHASE IIB FUNDING SEAPORT/FOOT/DOT DADE CO/CITY OF ;. RAMPS MIAMUOTHERS TO "- a->� DESIGN— SEAPORT/FDOT IMPLEMENT FOOT LZ PLANNING SEAPORT/TASK FORCE flow - PHASE III FUNDING SEAPORT/FOOT/DOT - ULTIMATE -- - - -- - - - -. DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS SEAPORT/FDOT • SEAPORT/FOOT IMPLEMENT EXHIBIT 0 M . ti \ G -op Itlll illii =11111 IIiIi li1NlII 1-95/SR 836 INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS _-.J: ST w- L Z Nw W _ t N n r ERR row S' i 1 A � � 1 S t Nw. EXHIBIT 2A 84-3 -«a, '4� 9 t5�.�r�t,'f4`'� r ti,�"4, � � •t` .�• +� wf'Y irat 1 �A yt� t5;'t j "} 'Yri}:y}�•r r��:�: � .a'I' .'FtM .+3,til�h ��.�^fir �,..�c .t�. 1'Y f.fi1.• -;�� j�-- a �� , � •• 'i .> �,. { •k� �n4�{ ( ski„., 1h..y,,,+f•. �.l;N°`�Y's4,��y,?r�i��i��� v. .r tj'a f 'Cl I 'ks �y �w t1i r�r y f, ��p %d� r?,J f '•.M ri ` at afi.S �1' '11„'4 v, V'A''K •� u• {Tr Wi � . ; tit r .• `l�`.` .-.tom• � a ., i "+.K y-` }, hi' p L+fv±:. -a I , - . � ,i� �tltt� 1► 6r PHASE II - BRIDGE EXHIBIT 4 84--35 • 2 i 4-LANE TUNNEL STRUCTURE FROM PORT OF MIAMI TO 1-395 ( WITHIN BICENTENNIAL PARK w/UNDERGROUND INTERCHANGE ) Disadvantages: I. Modification to existing traffic patterns on Port of. Miami. 2. Closing of Intracoastal Waterway for 9-12 month con- struction cost. (Cofferdam Method) 3. Some impact on Bicentennial Park during construction. 4. Requires above grade ventilation structure. Advantages 1. Eliminates Port traffic from Biscayne Boulevard by diverting it directly to I-395. 2. View of Bay is not disturbed. 3. No visual or physical impact to Bicentennial Park. 4. No obstruction between Bayfront Park and F.E.C. 5. Minimal real estate costs Cc- . 6. Deep draft ships may dock alongside park bulkhead. -szts: 1. 4 lanes - 2 lanes in each direction connecting Port Of Miami to I-395. 2. 14-foot draft at Deep -Water Slip. 3. Estimated $128.7 million dollars for construction, costs. 4. ' 11 ECoM`__ =_ EXHIBIT 5 6 84-35 v U Agenda Item No. RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING A THREE PHASE CONCEPT PLAN FOR PORT ACCESS AT THE PORT OF MIAMI WHEREAS, this Board desires to accomplish the purposes outlined in the accompanying memorandum, a copy of which is incorporated herein by reference, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, that this Board approves the Three Phase Concept Plan for Port Access at the Port of Miami as set forth in the Summary Evaluation, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner , who moved its adoption. The motion'was seconded by Commissioner and upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Barbara M. Carey Clara Oesterle Beverly B. Phillips James F. Redford, Jr. Harvey Ruvin Barry D. Schreiber Ruth Shack Jorge E. Valdes Stephen P. Clark The Mayor thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this Approved by County Attorney as to form and legal sufficiency. DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY ITS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS RICHARD P. BRINKER, CLERK By: Deputy Clerk 84-35 * =• w . t x t • setwagoi Haia.3ii+1 at W rraiaa! IS f 11"So Ulm" r; r• ,..r f�i ,�� t •, i unote'!p1 h ♦.16 alit. h a" it�r a cmsaw*; flat sup 09 ruclwk r 1MOM ek do 9w" POW% and do a Pain VMS 'row ft" pow eg loom vlow IN list Ott be Mi it aMgj lff"im of 1I 000 of OM 111Iuw }A 7 E !,a �raeri'' ;'F `. tit rs1Wtlw rMM�>t MAMA am, OWN* •"�'` of do allfwiaM &memosiIS #: 4 CM W us=* oaaar 1w #1 sma* am 1MMa ad ♦ tsrs0 saaa' �Z 0104 so r�Q el Wr■L�. rby as swmr 1l" rl! MMrtiraat �' .� : �tlsat i�a0 ��t w dN Adt t ........ w•. �oaa >d1r carat y dar O.i. by NOW so" pw as !lilLwrs: '" "' � is the Mrl� @WtW id'�� _ ' wam N OM ISO 1�'4. rl r+ikt . �.t 11i1� tiNt '"f" t 1'ail� 4� at Idr !!i►il+s �r�r'�s t ! � "� ,' '..• - iiat+rlMli of it bodged of do am* UU6,09 St iii fi� at �'1r�,a14�3 ti dr lisitat SOL" 41"aw11r fN�t1+Na led dar SM& lac die aRt�i s>L ' (IM.300) M i hits 40 dw,V.f. >resMrr TAM, hv,. �.� kk `jsf:t� . ri• .} it �� ?',yi: ,.} tF ,�f'iAr ter C7'ilr7a2 $ y" . � , '+*^'^�++�+�!r+■' :�C+,mot-a'�r.-«'F_`?'C�'�#$�'�'�'�' � 91RrlAw�e y' (S 30.00, E 1322.52); chance deflecting to the right ninety degrees; seventeen minutes, thirty- five seconds (900 17 3511) run along "Ld U.S. Harbor Line, a distance of one hurdred feet (100,001) to a poL1t (S 130.009 it 1322.01); Chance deflecting to the right eighty-nine do- grtes, forty-two oLvutes, twenty-five seconds (89" 4.1.' 2511) rwc westwardly, a distance of eight h•4trred Lht,rty-f ive and rtn•ty hundredths feet (b15.90') to a point of curve (S 130.000 S 486,11); .ti%A­a irin wstw rely and eovthvestwardly a1cig the arc . f said curve having a raiiwe of two hL,ndre,l .. Lghreon feet t215.00') and a delrA of t i f ty dexraes, f if ty-eLs fifty-nina and f Lve-tecths saccade (50" 56' 59.5") , a distance f )%% hundred aed ntaety-three and eighty-five hunlre f:he feet (193.85') to a p.)inr. )f tangency (S 21(,. 66 6 316.811; thence .un s3uthwastuardly • lu:Ig said t,a-g.:nt 1 ire, a Otatarce of eighty- ni-%e and seven httrdradthe, feet (b9.0I') to a point on cure (S 279.839 ff 260.1U); thence run notthwestwrdly along the art 3f saki c irve to ►.hr 1 elt hav og a radt..a nf five h.indred on* and thiriy-six !umdredths feet (501.361) and a delta -3f fourteen degrees, fifty-three ++mutes, forty- six and four -tenths secands (14" 53' 46.411).; a d is ranc: e of one hratdr ed thirty and thirty- f ive hundredths foot (130.35') to a point of reverse curve (S 173.660 E 185.72); thence tun northwest- wardly along the arc of said curve to the right having a radius of f mx hundred f i f t y -three and thirty-six hundredths feet (453.361) and a datta of twouty-one degrees, thirty eaioutss, fifty-nine and nine -tenths soronds (2lo 30' 59.9"), a dis- tance of one hundred seventy and twenty-five hundredths feet (110.25") to the Poiet of Begin- ning; containing three and sevent tan hundredths (3.17) acres, more or lees. Above coordinates refer to the Part of Muni system of local coordinates; 0.00 t, 0900 S is easterly intersection of Northaset Sixth Street nonumat line and Disc^yae 8&4L*vard monument line* zastarly projoccLon of Northeast Sixth Street monument line aasunsd true Bast. The south that itpuL (1.0 feet of the cost three hundred an-1 (370') feet of this saeesea t 4re co *# ue*d by the D spar t- mert of Yacht D^cou uf, l"tt CLty cf Miami tar marina purp✓ esm. Sketch of said "srrn.wa. aryl is hera►,o attached as Uhibit "A" anti !.% r-t.t'.,ronca made a part: hereof. 84-35 ��' �'3�'�.:�ri:WiWRlJr..�..• ...�- -- - - -- •A.�. �. _ ::Lit' Ve ta.es *rd �,i-pc,ses for which thto eaeieeet%t to grar.',ed ar.e rc pr�vile ar%. enr.�ance aparaa:h Vtd 'ex t r;.adwy for traf f i - p.tesLrg retwet% Rl scayn* Boulevard and tho cauaeve y which will be c.-,nstruct.ed eamtward t:rcm the e•tstarn terminus of the herein _'ea.:ribed e+aeemeat at the United StaLoe Harbnt Line as awe is wabl ished ,al: cR the west shore j Biscayne Bev, to Oadgo tsi•enc serve the r'-Tt faci:ttieo and •ppu-certrLes to be thorto!,: an-i (2) f r the : )rst•r•i.;tion, oparation sad zaiar.e-Kr*e of twricipal and public urLiities, including bCut nut lWit.ad to the cons tructioa and asintenarce of a rail= road *put treck to serve the said Port and its appurteorances, and appropriate devices for the signattuti-.-n and control of trot f 1-c ir. tLa movement between bi rtcayre Sou] evord and the P►)rt fat.ti ttri*4 on Dodge Island. Is Any plan for the construction or future isproveaent. of the heroin described eameiment area which salt by prepared for or by second party, and any future revision thereof, shall each be submitted to and approved by the City Kaeager of THE CITY OF MIAMI and no work required by any r ch plan or revision shall be performed on acid easement area until the plan therefor shall have receLved such approval. Second party shall not erect any structure or facility on the herein described easement area or slake any use of any part thereof, beyond the nosml use for traffic control and signalisatton, which will tend to hinder or block the use thereof by the public for igwass and wises to. and from (1) the aatni-;+pal audituri.o and Cunvention But -eat, located at the north w.74 )f Bayfr^nt Ptirk, and (2) the City 'hoot Dodos and 84-35. . e• 0 Main as they now exist or may hereafter exist along the •bore of Biscayne Say at or near the south boundary of the easement area herein described. �- Second party, at it* salt cost, and within cvo C� years from the date hereof, shall develop and provide a paved parking area norc.h of the day Front Convention Bureau and Auditorium, rj teplaca as nearly to is reasonably possible the area of the t: is t iag par k ir4 ar+sa vhic h asy be made unavail- able to the public by reason of the inclusion thereof in the tsst nr area htrain described, first party reserves the right either to construct and maintain or to permit public utilities to be constructed, operatad and maintain" over, across, through and nudes the swface of the herein described tasvernt area. Thka reserved right shall includ4 but not be limited to the construction of *tots and sanitary severs, gas, electric, talepbooe, telegraph. asd rater lines,. with appropriate appurtenances. The aforesaid reservation of right of user by first party for public utilities shall always be subject to tha condi- tion that any construction or use cheroot shall be done in a newer to sin"Lue the interference with or hindrance to any use by second party which spay be incident to its use of the area herein described as an approach to the caaaewsy or bridge afore - Mentioned. The description of the tasssent area herein granted will be emandad in the event it shall be detecsined by first party than, a greater or additimml area is needed to properly cbsnaelise traffic from or $&to Biscayne bouLavajtd, Any addi- • 04- ; 84-35. J!1 tional construction cads necessary by the enlargment of the easement area shall be at cost of second party. within 90 days after the date hereof, and at its sole coot, second party shall construct priperly bulkheaded Yacht a:ck wharf according to plan approved by the City Manager of The City of Himmi on the area herein reserved to the De- partmant of Yacht Docks for marina purposes, to -vat: the south 13 feet nf the east 370 feet of the easesant area herein described. Second party shall maintain the entire easoment arse herein described in such manner that at all time it shall be free from impedimnt or hazard to pedestrians or vehicles passing over or along same, and that particularly during any period of construction, improvement, alteration or repair on such easement area, proper access to the Muni- cipal Auditorium, Convention Bureau, City Yacht Docks and Marina shall continuously be available to pedestrian and vehi- cular traffic: Should the above easement be abandoned or discon- tinued by law or otherwise, the said "moment shall erase and revert to the grantor herein, or its successors. IN YITWSS WKKMW, THE CITY OF liUNZ, a mmicipal corporation of the State of Florida, has caused this instru- rnt to be exsuetod in its name and its Corporate Seal to be affixed hereto by its City Manager and its City Clark, both thereunto duly authorised, this day of A.D. 1961. Signed, sealed and Delivered in dies rreaence of: TER Cm OF Mimi sir• .... City W=Aget Attest: as City Clark • - . .5- 84-35. NUTS Cr FLORMA) ) as COUNII OT DAM ) I, A WWI MILIC 1►''aR TW ,'!AU OT TYMIDA AT LAMi, HWXBY CXRTITY that on this day of , A.D. 1961, peraooally appeared before as M. L. 1"" and T. L. Correll, know to me to be the City Manager and the City Clwk respectively, of the City of Huai, a comic ipal corporation in and under the Lowe of the boats of Florida, and kaoen to r to be the persons who executed the foregoing instrument and they severally acknowledged the examtIm thereof to be their free act and do" as such of - fixers, for the uses and purposes therein espreseed, and that they offLzod thereto the official seal of the said mini• cipal corporation, all by and with the authority of law and the City Comeission, and that the sssid iostruasat is the fro* aad F,F I act of the said municipal corporation. wrru d ny brad aad official seal in said Ommty and Otate the day'aad year last aforesaid. My Comiesion upirest Notary Public, OtAtO 01 FUWM at Legge -6• 84--35.