HomeMy WebLinkAboutAnalysis and MapsNOTICE
this submMal needs b he scheduled bra Public hearing
ina Ida WMt lneUhm set Forth in the City of
Miami Code.T, applies Websision-maXing hotly will
rewewthe Inbnnetion at the public hearing to n:nd er e
reco —detion or a final decitlon.
PZ-22-14676
06/22/22
City of Miami
Planning Department
STAFF ANALYSIS FOR
A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
Staff Analysis Report No.
PZ-22-14676
Location
1950 NW 12 AV
Area
6.106 acres
Commission District
District 1 — Commissioner Alex Diaz De la Portilla
District Commissioner
Office Location
Allapattah # 2 (the old Allapattah NET)
Existing FLU
Designation
Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation, & Utilities
Proposed FLU
Designation
Public Parks & Recreation
Applicant
Art Noriega, on behalf of the City of Miami
Planner
Ryan Shedd, Planner II
Recommendation
Approval
REQUEST
Pursuant to Policy LU-1.6.4 of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan ("MCNP"), Art
Noriega, on behalf of the City of Miami, ("the Applicant") is requesting an amendment to
Ordinance No. 10544, the Future Land Use Map ("FLUM") of the MCNP to change the
designation of the property at 1950 NW 12 Av ("the Property") from "Major Institutional, Public
Facilities, Transportation, & Utilities" to "Public Parks & Recreation". The proposed
amendment contains approximately 6.106 acres. Small-scale comprehensive plan amendments
are those that involve less than 50 acres of property and are subject to the Small -Scale Review
Process, as set forth in Section 163.3187, Florida Statutes.
Concurrently, the Applicant is requesting a change to the Miami 21 Zoning Atlas as a
companion item (PZ-22-4675). The companion application seeks to change the Property's
zoning designation from CI -HD (Civic Institution -Health District) to CS (Civic Space). The
Property is legally described in the attached Exhibit "A". The table below summarizes the
request.
NOTICE
this submMal needs b he scheduled bra Public h—ing
In —Ida WIU171helhm sd Forth in the C4M
MlarniCW,.T, appliwdebsision-makingbodywll
revlewthe Inbnnetion at the public hearing" n:nd er e
recommendation or a final d-ie.,
PZ-22-14676
06/22/22
Summary of the Existing and Proposed FLU Designations and Zoning
Designations
Folio
Address
Area Future Land Use
Existing Proposed
Miami 21 Zoning
Existing
Proposed
Major
CI -HD
Institutional
Public
(Civic
0131350010010
1950 NW
6.106
Public Facilities
Parks &
Institution-
CS (Civic
12 AV
Acres Transportation, &
Recreation
Health
Space)
Utilities
District)
The Property is located on NW 12 Avenue and NW 20 Street on the northern boundary of the
Health District. The Property consists of one parcel with an approximate area of 6.106 acres.
The Property is part of an assemblage of the City of Miami's General Services Administration
(GSA) facility. The entire assembly is approximately 18.8 acres total; the current proposal would
result in reducing the GSA facility by a little more than 6 acres to create a City park. The aerial
image below shows the site, outlined in red, and the immediately surrounding context.
NOTICE
lhls submMal needs. b= scheduled far a public nearing
in accordance wih timelines set Faith in th, city o
Miami CW,.7he applica de decision -making body will
reNewthelnfonn _ at fhe pu bbc hearing to renders
recommendation or a final deciaon.
PZ-22-14676
06/22/22
EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION
The Property has an existing FLU designations of Major Institutional, Public Facilities,
Transportation, & Utilities. The interpretation from the MCNP is copied below:
"Areas designated as "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities"
allow facilities for federal, state and local government activities, major public or private
health, recreational, cultural, religious or educational activities, and major transportation
facilities and public utilities, and general commercial activities intended to serve the
needs of the public. Residential facilities ancillary to these uses are allowed up to a
maximum density equivalent to "High Density Multifamily Residential' or if applicable the
least intense abutting/adjacent residential zoning district, subject to the same limiting
conditions.
Areas designated as "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities
allow nonresidential uses such as commercial and office to a maximum floor lot ratio
(FLR) of 6.0 times the net lot area of the subject property. Properties designated "Major
Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities" in the Health / Civic Center
District allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 8.0 times the net lot area of the subject
property. Properties designated "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and
Utilities" in the Urban Central Business District allow a maximum FLR of 37.0 times the
net lot area of the subject property."
PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
The proposed designation of Public Parks & Recreation is described below:
"The primary intent of this land use classification is to conserve open space and green
spaces of a park while allowing access and uses which will not interfere with the
preservation of any significant environmental features which may exist within the park.
This land use designation allows only open space and park uses with recreational and
cultural uses where the total building footprints and impervious parking area surfaces in
parks of one (1) acre of more may cover no more than 25% of the park land area (See
related Policy PR-2.1.3.). Both passive and active recreational uses shall be permitted
including but not limited to nature trails, interpretive centers, picnic areas, playgrounds,
canoe trails and launches, small concession stands, restrooms, gyms, swimming pools,
athletic fields, cultural facilities, marine and marina facilities and other facilities
supporting passive and active recreational and cultural uses.
Lands under this designation with specific qualities that make them desirable for
commercial photography shall be allowed to be used in this manner conditionally, and
only when it is determined that conducting such commercial photography will not
endanger significant environmental features within the area. [Added 3123199 by
Ordinance 11782.1"
NOTICE
this submMal needs b he scheduled bra public hearing
In—Idanrg WIU171pOhm sd Faith in the City M
Miami Cotle. The appliwde tlecision-maXing hotly will
rewewtheInbnatthe pu bnchearingn:ntlere
recom—dmentlation or a final tlecitlo,.
PZ-22-14676
06/22/22
The map below show the existing and proposed future land use designations for the subject
Existing Future Land Use Map I Proposed Future Land Use Map
NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT-SOCIODEMOGRAPHICS
Planning Department Staff retrieved data from the US Census Bureau's American Community
Survey (ACS) to analyze the sociodemographic conditions of the area surrounding the Subject
Property. Staff utilized the Census Bureau's 2016-2020 ACS 5-Year Estimates and observed
various data points for Census Tract 30.04. The table below shows the various data points for
both the Census Tract in which the Subject Property is located and the City of Miami.
Summary of Census Data for Subject Census Tract: 12086003004
Topic04
Population
5,922
City of Miami
461,080
Households
2,013
180,676
Avg Household Size
2.94
2.55
Owner -Occupied Housing
3.8%
26.2%
Renter -Occupied Housing
84.6%
60.1 %
Vacant Housing Units
11.6%
13.6%
Median Household Income
$20,091
$44,268
Median Home Value
$180,700
$344,300
NOTICE
this submMal needs b he scheduled bra Public hes,ing
In a Ida WIU17"Ohm sd Forth in the City M
Mlarni Code.T, appliwdebsision-makingbodywll
revlewthe Inbnnetion at the public hearing" n:nd er e
reco —detion or a final decitlon.
PZ-22-14676
06/22/22
Median Gross Rent $981 $1,242
0-Vehicle Households 25.4% 18.1 %
Census Tract 30.04 is approximately 231.16 acres (about 0.36 square miles) and consists of the
area bounded by NW 20 St to the north, NW 12 Ave to the east, the Miami River to the south,
and NW 17 Ave to the west. Over half of the Tract is zoned CI -HD Civic Institution — Health
District, which allows residential density up to 150 dwelling units per acre. Despite the
permission of residential uses, the portion of CI -HD that falls within Census Tract 30.04 consists
of non-residential uses such as the University of Miami Hospital and College of Medicine, the
Veteran's Affairs Medical Center, Miami -Dade County Police Department and other County
department offices, Richard E. Gerstein Justice Building (Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida
court), and the Miami -Dade State Attorney's Office. Removing the acreage of the institutional
uses leaves approximately 94 acres for potential residential use, which yields a population
density of roughly 63 people per acre.
There are nearly 6,000 people residing across just over 2,000 households in Census Tract
30.04 for an average household size of 2.94. This is considerably larger than the average
household size of the entire City of Miami, which is 2.55. The average household in Tract 30.04
is nearly three people whereas the City's average household is closer to 2.5.
The housing characteristics of Tract 30.04 are very different from the typical household in the
City of Miami. While both geographies are majority renter -occupied, it is much more prevalent in
Tract 30.04. Less than four percent of all housing units in Tract 30.04 are owner -occupied,
which is a stark contrast to the 26.2 percent owner -occupied housing rate throughout the entire
City. For every 25 housing units in Census Tract 30.04, nearly one is owner -occupied. On the
other hand, for every 25 housing units in the City of Miami, just over six are owner -occupied.
This means owner -occupied housing units are more highly concentrated in other parts of the
City. Homeownership and owner -occupied housing rates are important socioeconomic
characteristics to observe as they are correlated with improved financial stability for occupants.
Homeowners are typically locked into monthly expenses via a mortgage, which guarantees the
same monthly payment for up to 30 years. On the other hand, renters are subject to annual rent
increases and market volatility. In addition to predictable monthly housing costs, homeowners
are able to generate wealth through eventual sale of their home. In Census Tract 30.04, the
typical house is valued well below the City's median home value. In fact, the median home
value of Tract 30.04 is only 52.5 percent of the City's median home value. This means
homeowners in Tract 30.04 will generate significantly less wealth when they sell their homes
than the typical homeowner elsewhere in the City of Miami.
In addition to lower home values, the median household income of Tract 30.04 is only 45
percent of the City of Miami's median household income. To put this into perspective, the
Federal Poverty Level in 2020 for a two -person household was $17,240 and for a three -person
'•'fir ,'-
NOTICE
This su bmidal needs t b scheduled fara public nearing
ii cordance wih timelines set Faith in th, city o
A-i Cade. The applica de decision -making body will
renew theInfomr _ at the pub"c hearing to renders
recommendation or a final deciaon.
PZ-22-14676
06/22/22
household was $21,270. With an average household size of nearly three
people, the half of all households in Tract 30.04 would have been below the Federal Poverty
Level in 2020.
Looking at the median gross rent in the table above, it would appear that the lower median
gross rent of $981 per month would put these low-income households in a better financial
situation. However, the $261 monthly difference in rent between Tract 30.04 and the City of
Miami is not enough to offset the severely low income of the area. In fact, Census Tract 30.04's
median gross rent equates to $11,772 annually, which is approximately 58.6 percent of median
household income. Conversely, the City of Miami's median gross rent of $1,242 yields $14,904
annually, or 33.7 percent of median household income. The US Department of Housing and
Urban Development classifies households spending more than 30 percent of their income on
housing as being rent burdened. While both Census Tract 30.04 and the City of Miami are rent
burdened, the typical household in Tract 30.04 is more severely rent burdened than the typical
household elsewhere in the City.
Over one-fourth of all households in Census Tract 30.04 do not have any personal vehicles for
transportation. More households in Tract 30.04 have to rely on public transportation and active
transportation than elsewhere in the City of Miami. Fortunately, most of Tract 30.04 is within a
Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Area. Roughly 204 acres, or 88 percent, of Census Tract
30.04 falls in the Civic Center TOD Area. Tract 30.04 is served by Metrorail with the Civic
Center station located at 1501 NW 12 Ave, which is an approximately four -minute walk from the
Property. In addition to Metrorail, Tract 30.04 is also served by Miami -Dade County's Metrobus
and the City of Miami Trolley. The following Miami Trolley routes serve this area: Allapattah,
Health District, and Stadium. At least eight different Metrobus routes also serve Tract 30.04.
While Tract 30.04 has ample public transportation options and is also located partially in a major
employment center (Health District), income is still near poverty level, which indicates a
potential gap between jobs available and workforce training and education of the residents of
the area exists. Overall, the demographic and economic characteristics of Census Tract 30.04
are below the City of Miami's averages and medians.
NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT: GEOSPATIAL ANALYSIS
Staff inventoried the future and existing land uses in a quarter -mile area around the Property.
The study area is shown in the map below.
J �
Ii —
I
im UU,
EXISTING LAND USE INVENTORY
•
Hsi
NOTICE
leis submMal needs b " scheduled bra public hearing
In.c Ida WMil" Una set Forth in the city&
Miami Cotle. The appliwde tlecision-maXing hotly will
rewewihe Inbn at the pu bnc hearing to n:ntler e
recom—dmentlation or a final tlecitlon.
PZ-22-14676
06/22/22
_} e--,, 1 l_ 1_ —I I I 1 --Li
NW. 24TH ST — _ — _ 3W_23RD_5T_
I I I J I
ror LNW.22Np TEFt�
_ -- NW 22NN TER
Major
PUB, FAC
• o• •
Light •
Industria • � - • ��
Q
T � I 1 T �2 — [M 16TH"ST
— .., NW 16TH_sT jT >
4+
NW_15T S S7
NW 15TH�ST z
1 I
114 Mile Study Area s Multifamily Residential: 3+ Units
0 Subject Property Mixed -Use Residential N
• 0 Commercial 1' Parcels • Industrial �1
Existing Land Uses • Institutional
Single Family Residential Parking
0 250 500 1,000 Feet
Duplex Residential Vacant
NOTICE
lhls submMal needs b " scheduled bra public hearing
h --Mt
WIU1ll"Una set Forth in the C4 M
Miami Cotle. The appliwde tlecision-maXing hotly will
rewewthe Inbn at the pu bnc hearing to n:ntler e
recom-dmentlation or a final tlecitlon.
PZ-22-14676
06/22/22
The table below summarizes the inventory of Future Land Use designations within the study
area. The area is heavily designated for mixed -use, with the majority of FLU designations
consisting of Restricted Commercial and General Commercial. The area currently has about the
same proportion of Public Parks & Recreation as the City as a whole.
Comparison of FLU Designations in Study Area & Citywide
Future Land Use
Study Area
Acres %
City of Miami
Acres %
Major PUBFAC
108.00
54.6%
2,105.96
9.3%
Industrial
36.16
18.3%
449.46
2.0%
General Commercial
23.81
12.0%
967.02
4.3%
Restricted Commercial
18.75
9.5%
3,795.98
16.8%
Light Industrial
10.13
5.1 %
511.86
2.3%
High D. MF Residential
0.83
0.4%
168.89
0.7%
Single Family Residential
0.00
0.0%
6,176.28
27.4%
Duplex - Residential
0.00
0.0%
3,993.70
17.7%
Med. D. MF Residential
0.00
0.0%
1,440.74
6.4%
Public Parks & Recreation
0.00
0.0%
1,323.37
5.9%
Med. D. Restricted Com.
0.00
0.0%
900.76
4.0%
Conservation
0.00
0.0%
330.14
1.5%
Central Business District
0.00
0.0%
199.22
0.9%
Low D. Restricted Com.
0.00
0.0%
147.80
0.7%
Low D. MF Residential
0.00
0.0%
54.94
0.2%
Total
197.68
100.0%
22.566.12
100.0%
Below is a table detailing the inventory of existing land uses within the study area. The most
abundant land use is Condominium Residential, reflecting the great amount of residential
density in the area.
Existing Land Uses within'/4 Mile of the Subject Property
Existing Land Use
Folios
Industrial
59
40.4%
Vacant
27
18.5%
Commercial
19
13.0%
Institutional
15
10.3%
Parking
14
9.6%
MF Residential: 3+ Units
5
3.4%
Single Family Residential
4
2.7%
Mixed -Use Residential
2
1.4%
NOTICE
this submMal needs b he scheduled bra Public h—ing
In —Ida WIU1t Mona sd Forth in the City&
Mlarni Code.T, appliwdebsision-makingbodywll
revlewthe Inbnnetion at the public hearing" n:nd er e
recommendation or a final d-ie.,
PZ-22-14676
06/22/22
Duplex Residential 1 0.7%
Total 146 100.0%
SITE PHOTO
Site photo obtained from G
le Streetview:
Image: Google image from NW 12 Ave.
Concurrency Analysis
The Planning Department tested levels of service as required for this application. The Levels of
Service (LOS) testing is based on a potential increase in population. For this request, residential
density would be eliminated under the proposed FLU designation. Because no residential density
would be generated, the only concurrency testing required is for Transportation.
Schools
Schools concurrency is not required because the request reduces density from 9 du/ac to zero.
Recreation and Open Space
The MCNP requires a 10-minute,'/2-mile barrier -free walk to a park entrance for 72 percent of the
City's population to meet public Levels of Service (LOS). As the request will expand available
park space, this application will help the City improve its performance of this LOS.
NOTICE
this submMal needs b he scheduled bra Public h—ing
In —Ida WIU171helhm sd Forth in the C4M
Mlarni Code.T, appliwdebsision-makingbodywll
revlewthe Inbnnetion at the public hearing" n:nd er e
recommendation or a final d-ie.,
PZ-22-14676
06/22/22
Potable Water
Potable Water concurrency testing is not required because the request reduces density from 9
du/ac to zero.
Sanitary Sewer Transmission
Sanitary Sewer Transmission concurrency testing is not required because the request reduces
density from 9 du/ac to zero.
Solid Waste Collection
Solid Waste Collection concurrency testing is not required because the request reduces density
from 9 du/ac to zero.
Transportation
The MCNP has updated its LOS standards for the City with the most recent update of the
Transportation Element. The application was analyzed for the impact the request would have on
trip generation for traffic. The proposed FLR and density have the potential to result in a
decrease of approximately 11,800 daily trips and 1,100 P.M. peak hour trips.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS
The following is an analysis of the application relative to the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of
the MCNP.
Criteria 1
Policy LU-1.6.4: "Any proposal to amend the City's Zoning Atlas that has been
deemed to require an amendment to the Future Land Use Plan Map by the
Planning Department, shall require a level of service (LOS) review and a finding
from the Planning Department that the proposed amendment will not result in a
LOS that falls below the adopted minimum standards described in Policy CI-
1.2.3, and will not be in conflict with any element of the MCNP. Based on its
evaluation, and on other relevant planning considerations, the Planning
Department will forward a recommended action on said amendment to the
Planning Advisory Board, which will then forward its recommendation to the City
Commission."
Analysis 1
See the section above titled "Concurrenc Analysis".
Finding 1
Staff finds the request consistent with Policy LU-1.6.4
Criteria 2
Policy PR-2.1.1: "The City has a no -net -loss policy for public park land and will
adopt procedures to this effect for park land in the City Zoning Ordinances, as
described in the 2007 Parks and Public Spaces Master Plan. These will allow
only recreation and cultural facilities to be built on park land, will limit building
footprint on any such land, will require that conversion of park land for any
other purposes be subject to public procedures, and replace the converted
NOTICE
this submMal needs b he scheduled bra Public h—ing
In —Ida WMt mono sd Forth in the C4M
Mlami Code.T, appliwdebsision-makingbodywll
revlewthe Inbnnetion at the public hearing to n:nd er e
recommendation or a final d-ie.,
PZ-22-14676
06/22/22
park land with land similar in park, recreation or conservation value in terms of
usefulness and location."
Analysis 2
This request is a companion to PZ-20-6114 and PZ-20-6123, the Miami
Freedom Park Special Area Plan and its own companion Comprehensive Plan
Amendment. Those applications propose converting approximately 23 acres of
park land to other uses. This application, along with others, would satisfy the
no -net -loss requirement, as detailed in Policy PR-2.1.1.
Finding 2
Staff finds the request consistent with Policy PR-2.1.1
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above background information, the Planning Department recommends approval
of the request to amend the designation on the FLUM from "Major Institutional, Public Facilities,
Transportation, & Utilities" to "Public Parks & Recreation" for the property located at 1950 NW
12 Ave, Miami, FL.
Digitally signed byTrone,
ue
TrioS
ne, Sue Date:2022.06.22
09:24:01-04'00'
Attachments:
Exhibit A — Legal Description
Attachment 1 — Concurrency Analyses
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA
TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY MEMORANDUM
Sue Trone, AICP
Chief, Community Planning
FROM: Collin Worth
Transportation Analyst
DATE:
FILE:
SUBJECT:
June 13, 20
PZ-22-14676
n�la�
NOTICE
rnia e0hinai needs m to 1hedaiee mr a Pabn hearing
In —ream wkh nn,,[ — aet ronh in me Citynr
M., CWe. The applicade tlmi—n-making bWy will
reNew the Intonation al the public hearing to renber a
nso —d—or a final deciaon.
PZ-22-14676
06/22/22
Transportation Concurrency
Analysis
REFERENCES: PZAB File ID 22-14676
ENCLOSURES:
Based on existing and proposed FLR and density for the applications for the project
located at 1950 NW 12t" Avenue, the maximum potential impact as it relates to trip
generation was calculated. The proposed FLR and density have the potential to result in
a decrease of approximately 11,800 daily trips and 1,100 P.M. peak hour trips.
Based on this preliminary analysis, additional information is needed to help determine the
impact of this application. At the time of redevelopment, a traffic study may be required.
The traffic study should include traffic mitigation if significant impacts to operating levels
of service are identified.
Furthermore, as the site impacts SR 933, an FDOT maintained roadway, coordination
with FDOT is required.
DAILY TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON
EXISTING DAILY TRIP GENERATION
�tisz nFt!
..
NOTICE
ThIs submittal needs b be sch.&W d br a public heming
In aceortlana wM1h tlmellnes set forth In the city m
am Mli Cotle. The appll�d, decisbn 1,1ng bWynill
renewthe Information at the public hearing to re,d,, a
recommendation or a final decivon.
PZ-22-14676
06/22/22
ITE TRIP GENERATION CHARACTERISTICS•
.
®
�41
O
o
mmmv®m•m•mm�
• •••
om•m•�
• •••
omm�
• •••
om■ms�
ITE Land Use Code Rate or Equation
Total:
mm�
• • •
om•m•�
• • •
omm�
• • •
om■ms�
b 1 u Y=b.Z9-(x)-34b9.1Jb
PROPOSED DAILY TRIP GENERATION
.ITE
TRIP GENERATION CHARACTERISTICS•.
ITE Land Use Code Rate or Equation
Total:
mm�
• • •
o���
• • •
omm�
• • •
o���
411
Y=U.b4-(X)+bb.4b
IN 1 OUT I TOTAL
NET NEW TRIPS -5,909 -5,909-11,818
K:\FTL TPT0\042258128-W0#28 In-house Support\Correspondence\FLUM\June 2022\TRIP GEN 11_Redevelopment.xlsx: PRINT -DAILY
6/13/2022,4:27 PM
�tisz nF t
PM PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON MI NOTICE
ThIs submittal needs b be sch.&W d br a pubic heming
In aceortlana wM1h tlmellnes set forth In the city m
em Mli Cotle. The appll�d, decisbn-mahing bWynill
renewihe Information at the public hearing to rentler a
recommendation or a final decivon.
PZ-22-14676 j
EXISTING WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION I'k� 06/22/22 /L
.ITE
TRIP GENERATION CHARACTERISTICS"Ri:
•
• •V1
E}jV
C•4
ITE Land Use Code Rate or Equation
Total:
610 LN(Y) = 0.64*LN(X)+2.27
PROPOSED WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION
GENERATIONITE TRIP
®
•.
ITE Land Use Code Rate or Equation
Total:
mmm
• • •
omm®
• • •
o®m®
• • •
o®m®
411 Y=0.06*(X)+22.6
IN OUT TOTAL
NET NEW TRIPS -367 -696 -1 063
K:\FTL_TPTO\042258128-WO#28 In-house Support\Correspondence\FLUM\June 2022\TRIP GEN 11_Redevelopment.xlsx: PRINT -PM PEAK HOUR
6/13/2022,4:27 PM
FUTURE LAND USE MAP (EXISTING) -a
EPLAN ID: PZ-22-14676 NOTICE
((.Iami
needs to be schetluletl fora pabec hearing
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTncewU melines se forth In the City of
The applica Fie tlxlslon-making body will
formation at the pu bgohearing to render a
ommendad on or a final tleclC on.
ADDRESSES: 1950 NW 12 AV PZ-22-14676
06/22/22
0 125 250 500 Feet
F--
Industrial ~_
J z
NW-21 ST-ST I
General Light
Commercial Restricted Industrial
Commercial
NWr20THIST rn�il W�au g l m� u m w ng n �m
Q
2
Z
1
Q
2
N
N
it
Z
Majors n t- Public
Facilities,
NW_19TH.ST
Tray nsp Arid
FO
i
NW 18TH ST �O
U PCB
M J��
z
I
UNNAMED N
FUTURE LAND USE MAP (PROPOSED) ((.Iami
EPLAN ID: PZ-22-14676 NOTICE
needsto be schetluletl fora pabec hearing
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT melines se forth In the Cityo The applica Fie tlxlslon-making body will
formation at the pu bgohearing to render a
ommendad on or a final tleclC on.
ADDRESSES: 1950 NW 12 AV PZ-22-14676
06/22/22
0 125 250 500 Feet
F--
Industrial ~
J z
NW-21 ST-ST I
General Light
Commercial Restricted Industrial
Commercial
NWt20THiS rn�il W�au77
gl m7 u m w ng n �m
2
H
Z
1
Q
Recreation =
N
it
Z
NW_19TH.ST
Majorrrtlnst, Public
Facilities,) o
Tra plAnd
i
NW 18TH ST �O
U PCB
M J��
z
I
UNNAMED N
AERIAL
EPLAN ID: PZ-22-14676
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
ADDRESSES: 1950 NW 12 AV
125 250 500 Feet
s��M1�zs
NOTICE
This sobmktrt needs to be scheduled fora public hearing
in ¢ordance wM timelines at forth In the City of
Miami Cole. The applica hLe dxlsion-making body YAll
ratl_the Information at the pu bec hearing to render a
recommendati on or a final deck on.
PZ-22-14676
06/22/22