Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-84-0916IF k J-84-734 7/24/84 RESOLUTION NO. 84-91G A RESOLUTION AMENDING THF, tITAPIT CENTER II DUPONT PLAZA PRO,-11:(-'T DE'VE11,0PT1ENT ORDER (RESO[,UT-T0'N.(-- '81-840, (V.P'PVJITIEIP' 24, 1.981; AND 82-71., JATMAII-V� 213, 11)fj',) 11'-7 CONDI- TION 20 '11C) t--Jf) THF. TIME, 11JT1111'1 'A711TCH SUBSTAT,'ITIJU, 1TO 13l-"(.-7TT,4 FROM TWO YEARS AND ETC11TV DAY; TO TWO 'VEAR'; ONE HUNDPJ�1) AND OF TIIF" T11"'CORDED DATE OF DF]VF:T,OJ3MFJ,4T OPI)FIT1,; FTN,117lTN(> THAT SUCH A IN 11, N 1)? 1 E, N'11 1) 0 F! !i 1,! 0 T C 0 t I,-' )TTT U T r A SUBSTANTIAI., I)T. 1\717\9110N UNDF.R CHAPTHR 380, FLORIDA STATUTV".",; I"ISTARLTSHING 3,30 P.M., THURSDAY, OCTOBER 3,1., 1-91811, Of', A i-I'VICONVENED MEETING, FOR A PUBLIF VOR C(-Irq.';II)FRA- TION OF A TIME Y"Xfl-`NWSTOIJ AND 0' -. 4 J' N 17 1" A I I I,', N D tvl E N T S TO TH11" TATAT'iI CENITIfZ 7,11 DUPONT T'LiOA PROJECT DEVE1,011til"NIT 0 R D F R ( I Z H - 0 1., U 9'3- 0 N'S 81 - 8 4 0 ? SEPTET' BER 24 r 1981; ANID L32-71 , 11TNUARY 28, 1982 ) , AND CON':-) I DF11"ATTOT-4 OF V,-TI l"ITH SUCH AMEN DPI HIN'V,`3 CONESTI-TUTS DEVIA- TIONS; I)!REC'Pj-7!VG 911F. CITY C1,FIRK TO TRANSNIT COPIKS 01' 'i'll-15 1iFS01,1J'I'lOIN7 TO THE DEPARTMENT 017 COTIMIUNTJ.'Y A1FATR" AND THE SOUTH FLORIDA Rl"GIONAL PT,AT'1NIN-,G COUNCJJ, WHEREAS, the City Commission issued a Development Order for the Miami Center II DuPont Plaza project by Resolution 81-840, September 24, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City Commission subsequently amended the Miami Center II Dupont Plaza Development Order by Resolution 82-71l, January 28, 1982; and WHEREAS, by Resolution 83-1006; October 27, 1983, the recorded date of the Development Order was confirmed as May 12, 1982; and WHEREAS, by Resolution 84-527, May 10, 1984, the City Commission extended the Development Order by 75 days; and WHEREAS, by notion 84-5'--'6, F c.y 10, 1964, and Motion 84-726; June 28, 1984, the Commis, -,ion iind recorif i. rifled respectively, a public h--arinr j date ot July 12, 1984, for the purpose of considering amendi-tients; &ixi WHERI-11AS, the Mliami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting I of June 20, 1984, Item No. 3, following an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 52-84, by a 7 to 0 vote, RECOMMEND114G APPROVAL of an amendment to the Development Order, as hereinafter set forth; WHEREAS, by Resolution 84-762; 7131-y 12, i,olf34, the Commission continued the hearinq to July 31., 111114, an(l extended the Develop- ment Order hy 5 f3a,,/s to Jiil-y 31 -) W H F, T" T'", A -S C 17) tl i �; s i- (n cons i -d(-s that a time extension within which development is to begin would be advantageous,to i-lic City of ifliiami, Metropolitan Dade County and the State of cc:)mmis�fon may wish to consider further time extentions to , lrf T,c- e order; and WHEREAS, tsjf- r:j,i--y C( -)F giir,,sion desires to give affected k heard on whether forther time parties the extentions and considcrat ion of other amendments constitute substantial deviations under Chapter 380, Florida Statutes; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section I. The City Commission, following an advertised public hearing at which interested parties were given the opportunity to be heard, hereby finds that the following amend- ment to Condition 26 of the Mliami Center II DuPont Plaza Project Development Order (Resolutions 81-840, Sc-,ptem!r.)er 24, 1981, and 82-71, January 2b, 1982) does not constitute a sul)5-tantial deviation under Florida Statutes, Chapter 380.06 (1-7) (a)-(b) (1983). Section 2. The Miami Center II DuPont Plaza Project Development Order issued by Resolution 81-840, Septei-,,ber 24, 1981, and amended by Resolution 82-71, January 28, 1.982, is hereby further aii-Lenaed, only in respect to time, in the following particulars. 1 Condition 26 of the Development Order is hereby amended as follows: 1 Words and/or figures stricken through shall be deleted. Underscored words and/or figures shall be added. The remaining provisions are now in effect and remain unchanged. Asterisks indicate cnvitted and unchanged inaterial. 84-514-1"�' , Q "26. The Development order shall be null and void if substantial devel.opJrient has not begun in two (2 ) years an et 3} t r, f f8P } one hundred sixty -five Or,} n r7f t_he rnt «r±i1 71 atf th:t5 Develop- ment v 't) �c.t.•��,s�t� ,_ 1.984. Substantial deve 1.rl nr'rl;. i clr- r i n-d hrer e n as the achievement Of the fc�1.1_n4•. i.r�c t_e -- start: of c onst�r_JJ ti.nrr of building foundations for Condomi.ni.m To,,,,cr and garage; -" obtainlinq all. requi.rcd permits, variances, and approval,; -- preparation approval of raised pedestrian circuI at -ion r l.rJ7lrnt ans,; -- dedicai. i.on of al.l right-of-way; -- the deposit of: a.1.1 monies, bonds, or letters of credit for su _face street improvements with the County or tale ,La tc; ; -- finalization of a perblic sector financing package and/or a priv�tc section front -ending agreement for construction of the I-95 bifurcated ramps; -- construction of the drainage system for the Condominium Tosacr �_Ind Miami Center II garage." Section 3. The public hearing will, be held at 3 : 30 P.M., Thursday, October 11 1984, or at a reconvened meeting, at City Hall for consideration of a two year time extension and other amendments to the Miami Center_ II DuPont Plaza Development Order (Resolutions 81-840, September 24, 1.981; and 82-71, January 28, 1982), and for consideration of whether such amendments con- stitute substantial dovi.at:io�ns. Section 4. The City Clerk shall immediately transmit immediately copies, of t}lis Inc?solution to the State of Florida Departs,lerrt of C oJJmunity 1';.i:fuirs and the South Florida Regional Planning Council. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 31st day of July , 1984. TTEST: a RAL Ii C ONGIE City Clerk PREPARED I ND APPROVED BY: d0 L E. NkX4�I LL A istant City Attorney Maurice A. Ferre UOM A. FERRE, Mayor APpROVED AS To FORM AND CORRECTNESS: — - ------------- S E ARCJ JEM/WPC/pb/307 84-916, EXCERPTS MIAMI CENTER II DEVELOPMENT ORDER .. The Applicant Slhallr The City Shall the obligation to pay for be granted for complete uctkpedes-and cons' operation or- the project trian connection aia 10at. until t-_kan required pedes- triancircul.at lon system el•emeiit:s are completed, .� contingent on per, f ormance ' by Southeast 33 nk/Geraa d -` .. DuPont Pla-- a 73otal and the utters aC the. Pan _ A.meri man Bane S�u.i l ai.ng- j; :.. • provided that c-x tiwf'i.cates • '• ®f occtapanqj v inyl. be -- _ granted 'car completed pro-° ;^^ ject elements (Pang: aph 1} when the related pedes- trian circulation system - elements have been com- pleted,. r 12a. Reach, agreement —with 12b. -R so l %rc the remain the Cityconcerning ing ci rculataon the X'G!11a33 c'-i1t� pC?:C cr,t, an ciw Gu . a , t t`n "n'=`u— su Ca ll cc s ; ( .C _.�Y .'-.,� Y'' E. k (_� , . _ ... � ! � ;. - ! i � _ �.• - )n Order, i I_. t (•'.... �..,. ri',.,d� •c6�a�1i_ ��..-. 1� ,.. .{ �� ,.�t'. {-.�d'' i _ • « r d 1,�_i.7t .the a Bark :> ­6? rawF i�c: rc c F �I rr - 6kri'.Wi)Eg LA, 4p- revcarJ{ac:•, Pr, C'(-�cra.ted - pr upon project ccmpl,ction. - Comm s 7 cry �>,r�x� t�i�al�e a cc;tpiet, IrcporlL to the IF -. South Florida Regional Planning Council can 10a, =_ Ila and 12a® as amend- ment to the Application - for Development- App r oval. _ Nothing sh, all relieve the Applicant off it.-; chliga- 1 tion to pay f or and con- str.uct thy._ pedestrian connect i.Gn:; la': 1 Ga. 13a. liavtl— c.Ya, in 13D. 'Hereby approve, in eollcahoY a,t.i.on vith cony concept the `Modified cult:ants ¢'�fc t%;iix Florida Recommended High%-,aY SYS- _ Depart tY:bt of ` , user porter- tern Plan' a11 -e 3 S1C]il . (f C Ii 2i G.:i C3 G'r °" Z'ttache6) it is xt L. C;,* tt".tended b e y S l `-t a� Task Y� the 4 I � 4.A X 5w J � � a°� %t .}, i4 .3 k of G`ES' Force �c t�:..?�t:: > q S48 - to , t h e lil t I 1.? � ° L? L": a 't.:.) i a t C:Y7CL� w?'s E•CAtC C, t that :`l`v t._ l: tt . t`{C:" L t subs t ,I :_ 4.1, 11 for thei.Y yF. iJ adoptuc 1-8 ro IA. (`adLaitK4.1 hi- t..Cb,tti.i£',;1i€.E:d tan' have The City shall C ate been by the to urge PDQ`b to rtairatain -a Y �h ' Y o'k If, ter Gr4 lid, 77' _77 4;� rl�. Lo Itj:2. L t-a _77 77 If L`77�7. ­7 .77711 a -z 1 a 5' FIFIGURE '7 7� 77� -,:!,; a n a eu 07 C J Li P, 0 0-3 'I Jbllrw for t b a n ll o r) -'7esolut'lon 4 t P "0% '- !•rfi/x 47 JI 7, • •�.. . �„7 `�T'�'i a ti, 4 ! r �• t c'� :ta fr ' �• {t P Via r .. ' x t IF rr p f� P 8� •• �T 3 L � • SP p t «'�'r f •firr r p fg ,I i I I I I II III III. III III • Ilill��l� l��i�lli I Ilh .I I h �il� I, II LLII�I III IIJill�l I I�IIiV � I a� � I I � • .I� MY • 11. � ` t�,...q-f•.�q,.�^TA'L'af'•'t,,.p�vT :'�:'�'^'v.S'.T „� � / Jq , �) , � 1. . • • ~ •..�-... f• ®' 1, �-_ • .�i •�-_.... "� - -- _- �— `ter ♦ �� I, ,. 1_-�_c= J011 .4 • • ���.,..e- ✓ J +,' , ' a p Iry Q NOW ! t •.mil+"` r'r/' �--- _ - __ i t�'V� p;Il+i'•' � e f.• i q 3 '�, t•1 �a IN+ � t � � 1 .t I I Jt i �,� • � � ij'SA dJ �a / � - _- } A � I� 'I t,' .� ••I, V�^ ;; .. !t•-,� ,a . J• I Ira { �'r ': is �{ 0 � .1•�.O�p� �'' �'� ! �;j'.j j•j ���a�.tt;t �;� �r.y� �� �� iirLar M.';��j'.�;�ti�.?,.�t; 'i { 1 � '•; • • P._ � � / . � �f� _ :_ �, 1 1 � .!: f ;� ' �..�. Alt• I � `, fj' 7{� ,i., e 3 ! ; , d 1 %'nmr...qu•+"a1 'rs•'Y`.%") ; I ..i yr P,j / ! / killM:t*. t .../// I { j � r •'r"*"„�'°'^*'7 J "i. ' q l ti `t r � 6 - 1,� /• 4 ! ,: �� �. ( C "-T_.-."t:d1-•. - -_.-._ _ i _ - - , i I • -..�•. t•�n'•••r`.-•.+.•n,s: � 1• 4 L.r' f t e.�'.;��� 1p+,- % ,` /-- _ - I., 1;31_f��_ —�:V'i '1i��ly��,-n )•.^.�. ,�'.�. tL� ^•.',',,,x. 1 ':'1 � , .. � 91.t it ii. '_,"�,A.-."� � �_y._.._-. - -= � i " .� t_II��_ '••,�,�.+a .t_._s�-. ..1-2- .'' y •p "" :� .. t1....---�(- �i---_".—`__':." ,'%---'--"-All t � �_ I ;+ 1 'jam-=}��'�i !.r•,.i-�."�:i"'.."�`- , o�_..,, _.... • '- r--""_r. ji .t. J ,�j'- ,4'� 'i 'a i �/'v.:`/• a ''' i 1 _ ♦ ' .\ , �,• 1:�, \ r r ._ � 7 t7t i1 r ! �'. e.� t� " 7 � 5��+ ( �,�."I e' r I' • ti.. `s: �2: �. 7, 7 � .. a //• r 7' - .• a � •.�• . • 4r 1�-_--'L._ t ,., ,. �;•...� _' ._,_--_y_�'= •,� —=1j �-?-- ,� �t''. �,,•%/�/,r'r ///JJJa �/ ; � "' ` t t.•!/+. ^.r o„� 3 :13 y�x7t ;a M1-3",ia -�ss:a.::z-;- T-..---• - �+! sr �•�.✓"/" ; t. • / T 9{, R �•g • •���X� �. _...-.._. ». .-.._ -.-- _ _ ,. ..._��. _._.._.-._ . - _lr.d._ r,iJ,3.;Jfa/,ea ..:.la 3.i<i!✓ f 1 ,J� '{ `�'+ ' 1 � � +, • i ` ' 4 � r«. a.Y„ _ ' ,,, -. �^{:v ' a 1; •a f.a • � .. �� ,.� .� � tFj Li f" "A '' °� 't .�., .'� s 0't' a... MODIFIED Hi M"' . SYSTEM -PLANI 9-2 J r� 3 : :cCa"wm`uanulnu Jstitute for the plan preyQus!7 "OP" t • q 7 i 9 77 n .,..;, , o.-am+^a ...,:..,, ....wa.,,;..... _ .uo,�., _-.....r:.�, • �.. _4.x. °h�n�.C"urrr,`..:.f; .., ��'r .:, .+ .., �� .. 7-. The Applicant Shall: The City Shall: DuPont Plaza Task rorce on septembnr 2, x931'r with thr pirtici,pation of the B a nl,-, 'r i nn Ti r7 5.,a 1 Center/ Geral(I D, i, n c:; In t r rests and thr- Dupont Plaza Hotel upon, the granting of- all t1j1d CC_)n(1 variances .14 tional use permi ' t's neccs7"Iry for the devclopme.nt of Miami Center 11, d1sc7-issed in Paragraph I 11creof , and the obt-ainment of any necessary ack-Jon or agree- ments from, la3o City re- quired for thr.' construc- tion ox, tlln ccnt':!r c a n t Shafl, _(,ase-. y owncCi V, CCU 11 LIV 5'M - to) V tion p ca- tio- north right -of I c of SE 4th S 0..­!L.scaYie Boulevard 14a. A s s L, --,I o tha t the FDOT h za:;- i consultant under contract by Septem- ber 11, 1981 for the task outlined in l4b, committed to cc:-.ipleting cons '11--ruction documeratl; either a) 12 mcnth,t; thc.rc-after or h) 12 Monthf; J:"r-zLor to the esta- blished C C'-Ta) I t:: t i c n of cons t--,,2 cticn olE the Miami Avenue- D-ridge, �,,h i ch ever condition. -I, are- len- ient; fE;:zililnt3 which-. The OIZAII pre - par(:;, to speci- ficationt; to Lagreed • upon design and of the h11i1tL1_­_;11:'_-d ramps to t iulC-"' ­t-eets 4 and and c-'L 11,i` i 4 FDOT apprc,)\, z:. i t I t t-, u, zt' a L, U Ch Shall trams d by at Ie-an't one -north -bound lane Crmm the Brickell, Bridge to STE. 2nd. Avenue, to 5F. 3r-rl StTent to SE 3rd Avenue, The - ,I 9r,Int a building permit- until a COPY Of- tbis Davclopiment Order hris b(zen. t-ran:,7mjt_ ted -,,.o thc' Soirth Florida 'Regional Planning Council and s period o4 45 days has clapsed f,7cm tbe, data of issuance of this Order. 14b, It is expected that the FDOT will have a con- sultant under contract by September 11, 1982. cr,.-,i- mitted to completing ccn- StrUC4-' months Failing nq NA-lich., The City shall prepare plans, nnu'� and _'Cat- estimLtc f 0 4"" c., s n and engint2ei4nq of I , all I merit:: in VuPol-it such dc,aw_ j+ re - by Septe."l-Ur, IIK2. (t, S ka U city CC­"'1T1is­i0n' 11.'!!.olution 2G, ti -:- ! , / ;� .. The Applicant Shall: The City Shall: .. As a conclI1.:ion of ' s5ning a haxxldi.ng the j applicant a r s to ,pro- j vide ' ma.%nt rnancn of txa€ i.r plaza n,.;d a con.- struct:.ion em love- -: park— ! ing ing plan by cal.e"daa_ gvlar- ter- talitj-, •Tnl.y, 1994 or ! the is nu.,fice Of a cert,i- . ficate of occupa.ni-, or structures J'x) _m Gen- _. ` ter 11, to be approved by t' the City R j 1.5a. rund, bond, or prop 15b. Xnsure that the re- - vide of credit t to quired funding, bond or the County a.nd/or. Mate letter of credit has been _ for up to $813,200 (in provided prior to issuing 1950 dol.l.a.-.,$) for Mate any building it, €ar - and/car Coii,-it7.. the proposed dc,,7elopment of suz . c"r =;_; -"_ m T ?cave-- T `� or cer_ �.:z f i.catc., of occa- _ ment. Tt, .._ P 1,aza pancy €or any portion o€ = gene �; -;�� - :c those Miami Center I (Ball Point) . ion and z o€ t11,e _ P1 the it { r I t ` , l ( F..,` r.�. d 0.'' ' • - cun _ shill. C© ate-';. %.; f.i11, S1 ty- Would had the 1.)1),For-' _ station I,,ccn b, i."ao in =' the con c,,p to � l t-ran spor- .L k A -' tation plan adopted by _ MPO Resolution 1 -81; pro-vided howc-ve-a: , that any — additional costs €or the proposers relocation are the res on.sihility o€ the Applicant.. rr CC:: s l C4 p pe, .e pt!Ci_ " flca.tl.ons t_o be agreed tk upon Iay rojo ,, �r< d .r4ct _ ramps fr o-Ii thLc K .aizi . Cen— ter 11 carirqu to the - • I-•'a�� tWf.JJ"1YSl"-:t�t;.Ur at an q 1 t� det.errni.IV4, L�>y �:`i t '1'@ to insure `�_ill_:lt:1,'T2t'f_iL CC,na- _ pleticn C "1 t: hu 1_95 b1�t�iC; �. '�. [.`.`w .:a�/4.•t:.f'sit� the DuPont�)ith PI -do z> llo!_L�.4+ ' C,3h �.» � II { . t' � c� � ca t•� ��. r drrip '• _ , . Corar�i �.I „..rE 1 —c 5 into � nY nevl bu plc' nq r e c t e d i On t1la Dul'Ont motel site. The App'licant Shall: The CI ty Shall: 17. Evalnatn, in colla- boration %-6-th the Dade County n s e of Traffic -) -A I- ar and Tx, zirip i r t,, -,n, the Dade Cr I OU l- Txanspar',-, -a'Ann Mmin, - Stz Flar'i.-a De- • partment, of 'Aran sporta- -1�7 tion t! tions,ryr♦rlc in the Report and Recommcnda South Flo-* tions of tbo r, da R, e g j. a n a I Planning "bi is "B" Council (13:sh and any oCher opt.ons which m, I)e 'e ay a-sible for public szeclror firiancing ...114.6 m4llicn in 1.080 dollars) of -he- -95 • bifurcatcd rzimpr, to the Dupon,'Li r a SU rZ a C a 18..Front end 80% ($11, 68 million In 1980 dol- lars) of the construction costs Off- t1le 1-95 hifur- cated z by: op- cz, LI­r�,,Iirt.� lc,111!3 to o� _,ajnu vpu�:C_as-e rom WIL, ZU &Qell— cieso based on an 9 street systcm; and pre— parr-d a rc-,-nrC, r,"'Du .-CCCM- m a n d a -i-_J. (­,i z ""0 Or sub- c.n a I lan;l T ;I, t.-,, c Or - vial ol_ Tr a n 1), and Year c tile pr a J1. c -sac <,,,p should' sary to u a: a th e i realizat . or co tha, t con- struction , may bc( .7in :Lm- mediately aZr_-.c_- =m1ple- tion of t,,Ic Siam., .7'.Venue Bridge pro jectl. Co .s _4 d e - ration sh--11 L-Q gi-ven to the increa.sed ad valorem 17 r V, l- reven,ue-n A, i, Southeast Bank and MiZlmi center I (Ball FaIZit) aAnd 1*1 in funding these. necessary improvements. 84 '91C 40' / The Applicant Shall% The City Shalls quita.blereimbur•.s�e- ••e •Vent ag r e ;:- en !' among - appror rjat�-_ parties which f,-hall Specify _ R a- u Ate.. or _ b) ArrzM90 l0,111~ fo r o- bond pu1:c:1Aa-a se S a xcm appropri to govern- . . - ; mental. agenr-10 , to be evidenced }al- ta,c- -� e:•:G'Ill i� CC]�- f'a, ��ment:al obligati. cn which !•: •• are cligi—bIr for pledging (aL a mar- ket Val tat- Chat - equals the fl-Al Pur- chase r:n l ce )zn}st Public r a,. C? tii b ♦ ( �to M. •3 � t.1 �.1 S l.. t4 �. �, k '.. pia ca..nc, 1 ,"7S3is ' — b c e. 13y t 19a. 19b. Work closely with servaticil t .ae lac:. tx: (2 of the Downtown Development public .:: }".x` p Authority, the Dade County patina ir. T-_ :.n per nation Office of Tr anzporta.ti or. System Managcmente coor-- Admi.ni t_.a,tic_-n and the IM dinated with the Dade Applicant to prc:.Iote tran- County office. of Transpor • t si usc;-2hall encourage a tati cil drain .�s:_-a .L n, doi�ntc,fn p.,z -; ..c pr =o' ng ��� u — through such measures as policy t c� employer-subsid .aec ride - hour use ..zad xl d? i con- van rcg sharing . Z ..1I-- all,d. d. p t•Ldd��L �. +t a.�w.l. t_. ii�f.. I� �... 44♦ 4� pools; 'Ga_riaLL- e -vvo `k hour to rust=ict. or 1--rchi-b—t — schedules Stye.. as ;,tlagger'ed on�- truc �_�_.tw1, all ��'ntc,11c1ed. — work hours , l�T andref which, aru to a 4-day w or"td =c.c k; eiiEployer inax�Lm.:.'.c: the Uso of the subsidiZe:d tr La n s,.. use available roaC;way c��pa-- COUpICnd 4fi th ° I i(1 C " t tw city. parking pol ir: , to dia- _ appIieiin : L. 1 as I.. ' ePQ..w e a report fcr wit-h- 'Ener_av '. ,,.. .. .• ...• The 1:pp1.' c, a2t-W �r,tti`�.1.� 1 i0 a tc:chnI.cal feasibility analysis for construction and ipe 4i 11 of cs cogeneration facility, which analysii s r1suz A.X2�- �- clude those eiemeig to specified in SFRPC report (Exhibit On") ff 0 t COMMISSION ACTION CITY OF MIAMI. �LORIDA AEMORANDUM Howard V. Gary City Manager io Rodriguez, DiY'ector Planning Department GATE: July 20, 1984 F(Lfr SUBJECT Amendment to Miami Center II DuPont Plaza Development Order; Time Extension REFERCNCE,': City Commission Agenda of .N.L.'.UR,'-, July 31, 1�P-)4 The Planning Advisory Board r(--,cnnm-mended a) a finding of tic) dcvjntion and b) � II the ...... ... .......... u o ,)t P] TO .-Ct, Miami e T,-� 'I, I V e 1. 0 T"-,) I - 1 0I' , i,� Te Tpt e- -m- -i -r- (3 -Y I and a f Regional It I pci o Miami a!,-, r, u 0- and a p p r ox irn,,at e i Y 2 0 1 - Q —S't T(-� e t T-Tc- a b 0 u I o v a r d Viay) being a,.11 ol' Blo,ks 2, 3 a nd 11 * D U 1 0 11'f P The Planning Advisory Board on June 20, 19814, by a vote of 7 to 0, one nlember recommended a finding , of' a) no sub3tantial deviation and b) cIn aricridn,'ent 010 day tit--nc extension to the Miami Center 11 DuPont:;D�'vejop,,Iien,t' Order, a Development of Regional to t)e loc�jLle(f, ii,, 14,i .. On July 14 1c)cl,14, '�eL;03.ution 811-762 which continu(,,d the public hcz.4r4nLf, cn thiL,- `tcl{j to July 31, 1084, and e x t. e n d 0 d trc-1 L c v e I o I) Fri C"I'l t 0 r, d t, - 1.) y '� days Ito July 31 The re,-sol tit i on be: ,: n d t ° a ft e d to r e fl c- c t t h r-- (90 day time extension as recommended by the Planning lkdvisory Eoard , Ir~ss the 5 day extension granted on July 12th by the Commission. SR/JWM/vb Attachments 4 V OWN PAO MEETING OF June 20, 1984 PLANNING FACT SHEET APPLICANT City of Miami Planning Department: June 5, 1.984 PETITION 3. APPROXIMATELY 2.. 0 1 - 3 0 0 SE 2ND AVENUE; APPROX IMIAli-E.1 13 V 0 . L . LIV M ) 1"W --------- -- ALL OF [1-0(',J"'R Ccnsider. A,iun oi ti a1 deviation End I.,) w,. 1)(?',P!)1q1'!, 0 the Center 1 ,;, .1 II Did -lord ` -,v 1 Order Januar y a De ve I n 1) r,,-; n E. 011 downtovim f1-i REQUEST To extend the tit;. i }i;'i t; ; r r� i�( '°i, ii �:}�r.,'r.t�r- I1 DuPont Plaza proic,c-'t D ev c -1 o L (11), C, - " 1, by 90 days and 111, as a future public hearing date for the Coml;-,.ission to consider a further tim,--' extension and other amendments. BACKGROUND The Miand Center 11 DuPont Plzza- Development Order (Resolutions 81-840; Septeniber 24. 1981, and 82-71; January 28, 1982) a. 11 ow('! d the developer, 1,1 i a i; i i C c, n t c- r Joint Venture, to proceed to drvclopu,ie three vacLnt blocs in DuPont Plaza. This Developm-nt Orcior tjjjol.,cd (i c-ve t of the 6 acr(."' sit(� UP a F1001- Ratio of 13.95 net (-04'o ri !'t� d Cj 1' la }�' Q "I (� --.1 )or eifiic tower, a 74-f I oo r 4 0' c .,, r pa l -k i 1) 9 garage.. 9, 11 C I C, S ktve 1-�-sporided favork-'bly I- V i s' i -"I the 1-95 a p! the bifurcAed r cu stl station fvo,,, 4,.,,J uj of SE 'u 3rd Av(-w-f(,-. The certain ZA z4l'i d, 1: 0 �� c I i which W&I't c�'dVinh(�t�U touc ". ! t 0 i thi- C�ty of Miami, Metrupol i tali Dade cwntiv cnd th(State of Florida, sMiwarized as follows: Condition 10 a - joint funding of pedestrian promenade and pedestrian bridges. Condition 13 a - dedication of e4asements and rights-of-ti.,ay for the 1-95 bifurcated ramp system a n 0 pcdes11rian system. Condition 15 a - fund. !'-trod, ot- ri-OVi si on ofii;'q: or or` dol1;.It addi i:i for relocc,., I •inct i (;lS !-i,rt. c;(t on deve l o,p( t ' F t^C:fSp, nsi - hilii Condition 16 - Constvucc 1,-1 cri of direct r C3(itps t f}l;i Ili and Center II parl<i ng g r%i�ge to the 1-95 connector. Condition 18 - Front: end $11.68 million (in 1930 dollars) or $13.96 million (in April 1984 dollars) for I-95 bifurcated ramp con- struction if a public sector financing package cannot be avratiged. The following actions have bec-n tO,,cn previously to extend the UeveloIiment. Ordlu-r vihich would otherwise b cottie- null and void in too years from the date of the DU v(>10p::,� nt 0)-0,Cr ;finless substantial e car,, tructi on li(,:,r1 -_ By Recolutlon 83•..10106, OcU,AA:r 19,83, the recorded &A'Le (Order was confiriii,, cd I t 12, MO`2— __ By Rze,-oluticti �: , Eli, 11;wy° 10, 19114, the date upon which 10& f.. rdc`f° ii£:E c l;i' hull and vol d 4 aL € xLk—: f't d by S days 2 years and <b (,ayt. f=rum, lay i?, 11984) or until July 26, 1984. By Resolution 84-762; July 12, 1984, the date upon which the Development Order became null and void was extended by 5 days (2 years and 80 days from May 12, 1984) or until Jitly 31, 1.084. ANALYSIS The implications Of not extending the Devel opri-ont 0 r d c r woul d, ---incl ud-, for the developer, starting over i tIn ! n�,i Application to the S(,,tj'j) -lanninq Council. onc I For the pohlic', `,h,, 'i r-, p 1 ca i s, 111,0111d include 1055 () f f t f I-, (I j 1-i,7 for '-I.1 local S t r (" e t mp r 0 V C-n-I i il, P L 11 c r 0 u S 1 N! jeopa r(ii s n c ci,ti v-- on 1-95 Connec i - ej c c i! to DuPont TIaZa. (Attach,mcnt,, i tom the Mi ami Center I I Development Order are attached for information purposes.) RECOMMENDATIONS PLANNING DEPT. Approval of a 90 day extension to October 24, 1984; further recommending that the Commission establish a public hearing date of October 11, 1984, for the purpose of' considerin(i amendments to the Hliami Center 11 Pevelop1rjent order. PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD Approval by a 7 to 0 votf, June 20, 1984, of a 90 day time extc-nsion. CITY C01414ISSION At its m,=-etlng of July 12, 10-51,11, the City Commission per Resolution 84-7,,52 continued the public hearing to July 31, 1;184, and extended the Development Order by 5 days (to July 31, 1984). S.E. 0 m !tr iQ ntl ii4, lu U271 s;m �_,Tmlwp 0 p P L TRACT oe-0-0-775- As 36 7b C rV_ -7, E 2 Ave WAV 111,7 MR, 77� �Saola%ftq in -A t Y; f = Moe j P,.:4 t t 1 ' ��'1rca-,5,�. , �,� s�'^S'*r �"'•t ' � Z�' � {� f r` F}„+..q r wew+,e�. _ 'I'll IT K: f. I � t � ' p � _ii5 "., � • -� �a-c .ar 9 6't y. `�> -a,, �. 1 •`'a' -��`�' i .Ey a Nx ��r � "` F�� 1ti :. � ....,..-.•--' � t�•.�.�°'ir "� +ltir 1 a� ' � ..It--e,�•'!��� J �.- z�"ass.'4 '��5�<r � n,„„�• _,,.�, `a...- _ ��S � � � f � �x¢. ""e t� Yj " � r �ge�!lILLL....��� \ �i -��� �• '�' _ •' 1 x cn. ♦ ' "�>F ,,� /, ' tl 1 � t 1%, 1 � ^wv. 4, _ i.. v � .x -�, / � — 4 �Y ,, :•+ •a,•. '.-,.s ...5, �_�� �t t f., ai, � �'. L. � v� y'`Q. 4,,. �. � �.1 <�P �v� .'' �aasl �,. y �.f�,„.� t ���,A,£��,�g., "'°,�vg a c y e• .�-. i I :Rvu'r- .w v t �s rsf"f�'eP..c,•-e �l . kt• -',. , ` r. t _;. k...::•{ :..1-. f ;ij " -{ J$ It'.. �....... t k t.<!� `a.-'.�„y� 3 C ' �•,_` r 'b".'».'•�',1,v'{ "''' «,5 a. 4 y�� .s• � � +' '4 o- I• L i 1. i J !3 •C 51y `4 l `^,�'�: J«t"' "y �� r { t' 1�i; :. �. ��, T'P �'F. F,k y.. I Rr. t'�t f't�Z.•`1.- ' w"�i6.�� 4ti� ���� s ,� e�� �'��_.— A t , 1 JL .'4.0 Av"�` . r� a< ,r.t1 � - �V4.� • : � 3 -. .�.--``�`� -L`i.` k t %%'nx _._'. �,.i t. .. r, tC } i• j 4— t •I `_2•a a , i - _ t,z'"_'.,`.' r 5. .� f� w.,r.XttF:..teS�y 4, � 1fr` � � . y� � ,. i ` �'�•`7`R"».c.� `� .. �5-`�}�- � �, i`. �T... , � ``ry, 4``z`3- t. �:: ' � � 6 J �11. ......•_•--r"- 2F �y� !h i } > P� ._� F ` t ls,. Y d i8 �.. r_ .: tk � 1 i � \ .. [ �' �; � -> '' � ��'� � t c,• .� . ; � '� i t "' ` "=. :+ _ } � - t F d 1. i \ .. "` � t t r['si`: J, 1 ti.� "� -' � � �e � � �� �`� t A t � �l" � J`�. t - 1 \ ` � �ye?F .0 �-� � • 1�t Y<' / �` e i ,� • .t r 4 > - i t'"...�.- _ 3 1 y r ` ' Ytc .E. t 1 tj 1 f ^^• ,y ..: h S-�.."'ti \i (e L �s .. r" t � I � `- t_ W CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM ro Honorable Members of the DWE: City Commission SUBJECT: FROM REFERENCES: Howard V. Cary, City Manger ENCLOSURES: June 21, 1984 FILE: Claughton Island - Low -Income Housing Issues Per your request the following summary has been prepared explaining the origin and development of the Memorandum of Underst,arndinS Betwcen Claughton Island Investors And The City Of Miami for the prevision of low income housing. September 9, 1974. fosse m :< t _ i Regional Impact for �.....a..�m..�..nd augi�lton .iular�a b � the -SUM art i � r < 1 I ' xnni ng Council.. �, _._ s part of _ the t;h.2. r� r�ea for denial of the project, the 0aff rccommcndod that the applicant should make a written cammit ment for r• an appropriate amount of low and moderate income housing. 1he <appl,icant, had made no such prior proposal. The report: further suggested donation of land or buildings to Dede County HUD for this purpose. December 18, 197f. The: Miami Planning Advisory Board, by esollitl.C)t;_ T" Ni l' 54-74 recommended issuance of a Development Order after considering the SFRPC report. February 12 1975. The City Commission after considering the FT `. report, ordered the issuance �f a Development Order by Resolution 75-135. February 21, 1975 The Claughton island Development Order. This Ord€�'"?w in lC�iOri tatL.S TLt�cit� flit V't�V 1�T r' �:a- vi'IE?•red to furnish 300 unit, of medium income housing charging rental fees that do not include a �Vi ure for capitalized and value, but the n C` d theresultingr., t 2- j t�above Planning Advisory Uv<ar,� 10U�IL t 3f �:Clt«w would �_, the low income threshold. This zect"._Oln further states that the PAB encourid t<i the developer to provide v t lcast vu units (A housing, that the City Commission mediut;-�r�t�;c;,yi �.:�_F income �i<,u ,arrr:, -eri�i �.: ;,.� would r ,tl t<`'ti: .the t t,.'<<loper to provide ov_de _t iea 200 units f low Income ran&l units . ,e t d an the asland, : e o I li t ion No a C. 4 2 i, the C i t Y 4' ✓ rr m i s s a. . n �approved a ,.t,:or a..dum of err er" t__ni7 sir; b ut,'. een Claughtcn island Developurn :f_ _ne City czr _ty w income housing. T li_ action ..as taken to . _ m s an appeal of the development ,girder by the South Florida Regional Planning Council to the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission. Page 1 of 2 zisc �L Honorable Members of the City Commission In the STIPULATION OF AGREEMENT TO CONDITION THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER AND TO DISMISS THE APPEAL, it stated that the developer would be hound to provide a minimum of 200 units of low-income housing within 10 years a.s an integral part of the overall development sc some for the May 14, 1975. Memorandum of Underst inui.nc Dettae:cn C laughton Island Inv;stors Ind the City of Miami In ire Loi-. .income Housing. Section 1, Shall provide riot leas than 200 units of low - - - income housing no later ;hr: n 2/ 112/25. The units to b'� int,,ersporsed t,hroug110ut: the devc1oj,mc-1 Section 2. Low-Incori+-� housing ':-o be defined a.:> units availabl for rant, lease or sale, at option of developers, at a price meeting the minimum current standards of the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development as published in the Federal Register. Section 3. These low income units shall only be offered to persons who meet the criteria for low- income individuals. Section 4. The developer is not prevented from receiving any local, state or federal funds which seek to provide or encourage the construction and maintenance of low-income housing. Section. No less than 200 low - income }.ousing units shall he cornpleted and available for occupancy by February 12, 1q5�. Nowhere in the MEli0Ra14DUivi CE UNDERSTANDING is there any requirement to provide medium or medium -moderate income units. Page 2 of 2 41 w 0 O _- MOW August 61 1984 Mr. Michaael Garretson Director Community Affairs ement Florida Department Of Division of Local Resource Manag 2571 Executive Center Circle East Tallahassee, Florida 31,,301 RE: MIAMI CF,NTJ-,11ri YJ DUPONT PLAZA pRoJEECT RALPH C. ON(JIE City Clerk MATTY IflRA1 Assistant ON (jr,-V, DEPUTY CITY Cl(R,S Robert i-. TinFlr'v Georgia fi 1j, 11€ Sylvia M. Wn(307A Eve, ,in Riau Sylvia Lecww'rnan Lillian Dickmon Dear MrC.,aj-r -t,son - D1.rect0r: find a copy Of Resolution No. 84-916, f .-)i-ease Commission at its meeting Enclosed hc�" the City Of Miami passed and 3a0pjed b, is self -explanatory - held on July31, 1984, which than),- you for your kind behalf Of the City Of Miami attention. truly your-15 I <(2- Ra G. Ongie City Clerk RG0:s1 ENCt a/8 OFFICE Of THE CITY CLERK / City Hall / 3500 Pan American Drive / P.O. Bo, 330708 / Miami, Florida 33233-0708 / (305) 579-6065 C-7-,, 47 v o yell August 6, 1984 Mr. Barry Peterson Director South Florida Planning Council 3440 Hollyvjood Doulevard, Suite 140 Hollywood, Florida. 33021 RE: MIAMI CENTER 11 DUPONT PLAZA PROJEECT Dear Mr. Peterson Director: RALPH G. ONGIF City Clerk MATTY HIPM Assistant Ci1v Clrrt. DEPUTY CITY Ck.VRK� Roh-rt F. 7inpl,v Gporgi'l ?A. hifle, Sylvia M. NAc,n(fiwa F%elio Ri'-0 Sylvia Lowman Lillian Dickmon Enclosed berein please find a copy of Resolution No. 84-916, passed and adopted by the City of Miami Comnission at its meeting held on July 31, 19B4, which is self --explanatory. r On behalf of the City of Miamif thank lou for your kind attention. truly yours, ?, truly . C 1piph G. Ongie City Clerk RGO: sl ZNC: a/s OrFICE OF THE CITY CLERK / City Hall / 3500 Pan American Drive / P.O. Box 330706 / Miami, Florida 33233-0708 / (305) 579-6065 F-V-W��