Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem #20 - First Reading OrdinanceFIV v J-84-629 7/6/84 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMFNDTNG THE, ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE NO. 9500, THE 7OMUIG ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ri17011, 13Y CHANGTNG THE ZONING CTASSTFT('ATT(-)TT or APPI0"TPIATTT." 2737 NO RT H WF.S'F' 1.7 T I I S'TRRFT;T, PITAAtIT, FR.,;II?TI3A, (MORE PAR.TICUI.APT2'Y' ;)T SC'T TR?I;I RTF;IRT TT1) f RC?i9 RO 3/6 RESII)ENT'TAT_, 01"FTCT TC-) Ci-----3/7 COilillERCIAL RESTDENITT_ AT, ((7,MIEPATI BY i1[- T,T.Tff [' TIC?I)Z'!-jGS; AND BY t;r;T;Ti1G AT,T, `1'IRI? CHANGES ON PAGE NO. 26 OF SATD ZONING, ATLAS NATIT A PART i- OF., ORDINANCI NO. 11500 BY RhFF�RENCE AND bESCRIPTION IN ARTICLE, 3, SECTION 300, THEREOF; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. WHEREAS, the Miami Zoning Board, at its meeting of June 18, 1984, Item No. 1, following an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution No. ZB-47-84, by a 4 to 3 vote, RECOMMEND=TNG APPROVAL of a change of zoning classification, as here inaft.e set: forth; 1 and, WHEREAS, the City Commission after re ..-1 con id ration of this matter deems it advisable and in the t interest of the general welfare of the City of this change of zoning classif i an i ft inhabitants to grant on[ s hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT 0}QAED OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: E COMMISSION OF THE CITY Section 1. The 7.,onin'.4 `,�tllas of Ordinance No. 9500, the zoning ordinance of-' the City c`f`..tti{,mi, Florida, is hereby amended l P , by changing ti c- ' of ng cal i:: ifi.cat i.oil of approximately 2737 kj Northwest I ,th SLr1 etiami, Floridz-a, more particularly described as Lots " W 41+, 50 and 51 le.,..:-; Pl"' ADISE PARK 1,1,") u I 11ti' 1"alDI i c of I)ade County, }�'lori.da, { l from t0-; 3 6 .I :Tki lTnv1'1OFFI(:I to CIt--3/7 CUtYiC; `i v]I:L €tE;; II)LN`I'IAL (GENfit,. L .SeC t`i c.tt `".. It is hereby found that this zoning classi- A l f t f icat ion clhtillgc- : f*f (a) is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive ...�`° Neight)orhood Plan; (b) Is not contrary to the established land use pattern; (c) Will not create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearly districts; (d) Is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood IRRIM