Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
M-84-1320
At JoUtt. # SIOP6 Mori oN S4— 32Q e R.ALPH G. O'.GIE -,Maw CEWCo City Clerk M�TTY HIRAI �l �J Assistant City Clerk DEPUTY CITY CLERKS Robert E. TinFlel Georgia M. Little Sylvia M. Mendoza Evelio Rizo Sylvia Lowman STAFF SUPPORT Lillian Dickmon November 28, 1984 Dr. Elton J. Gissendanner Executive Director State of Florida Department of Natural Resources 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32303 RE: STATE FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CITY PROPERTY Dear Dr. Gissendanner: Enclosed herein please find a copy of Motion No. 84-1320, passed and adopted by the City of Miami Commission at its meeting held on November 15, 1984, which is self-explanatory. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, Y C�;�Rph . Ongie City Clerk OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK / City Hall / 3500 Pan American Drive / P.O. Box 330708 / Miami, Florida 33233-0708 / (305) 579-6065 l-1-S"I-13D-0 WLAW OFFICES ox X/&Z. We�? 1020 DUPONT BUILDING 169 EAST FLAGLER STREET MIAMI, FLORIDA 33f31.1204 Nrwember 139 1984 MtOHONt:06t) MAO Mrs. Lucia Allen -Dougherty City Attorney, City of Miami 169 East Flagler Street Miami, Florida 33131 Re: Commodore Bay Project Applications Items 6, 7, and 8, November 15, 1984 City Commission Agenda Dear Mrs. Dougherty: This office represents Friends of the Everglades, Inc. and the Sierra Club in their opposition to the above referenced zoning requests. Upon reviewing the file at the office of Planning and Zoning Boards Administration, I noted several defects in the manner in which these items have been processed. Some of those defects and deficiencies are as follows: 1. Both applications for change of zoning on the subject property were not referred to the Zoning Board for the holding of a public hearing and the making of recommendations. This is in violation of Ordinance 9500, Section 3504. 2. The two successive requests by the property owner or his agent, for change of zoning classification, violate the restriction of Section 3514.3 prohibiting consideration of a petition for rezoning for a period of 18 months after the City Commission has previously changed the zoning classification of the property. In addition, the splitting of an original request for change of zoning district from RS-1/1 to PD-MU into two separate applications is an attempt to avoid the effect of Section 503, which states It is specifically provided, however, that where floor area and similar ratios, including land use intensity ratios, have been generally established by these regulations for a particular type of district or in particular areas, the City Commission shall not act in a particular case to alter said ratios. It must also be pointed out that no application for the original request for change of zoning from RS-1/1 to PD-MU was ever filed. 3. There are no files being maintained by the office of the Planning and Zoning Board Administration for items 6 or 7, the requests for change of zoning district. When I asked to see those files, I was told that all the information was contained in the file folder for itern number 8. In addition, I could find no evidence of any pertinent information accompanying the applications for change of zoning or payment of the fees and charges for same, as required in Section 3502.3. H 84-1320 �3 Mrs. Lucia Allen -Dougherty November 15, 1984 Page 2 4. Until such time as the property can be developed in a fashion which would bring it under the jurisdiction of Article 28, Major Use Special Permits, as defined in Section 2801, an application for a special permit may not even be accepted. Section 2303. 5. The applicant has failed to make any showing that his property location is "appropriate in terms of Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and particularly the land use and transportation plans of the City.... Section 1201. 6. The file does not contain required material as set forth in Section 2802.3 More specifically all of the following shall be required before the application for Major Use Special Permit shall be considered to be filed for processing: 2802.3.1 General Report.... 2802.3.2. Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan.... 2802.3.3. Developmental Impact Study.... (emphasis added) It is our belief that these materials, as such, were never submitted to the City. Furthermore, additional information which was or may have been considered in connection with this application has not been made a part of the file. One example of this occuring is a traffic study which was supposed to have been done, is not in the file. 7. "The Analysis and Recommendations for Commodore Bay Project" dated August 31, 1984, as submitted by the Planning Department bases its analysis largely or completely on the statement in its first sentence that "... given that this request represents an extension of the SPI-2 Commercial District Development .... The Analysis and Recommendations, then, seems to be based on the erroneous argument that this property is zoned SPI-2, which it is not, or that it should be treated as such. For the above reasons, these zoning applications should be administratively denied. If I can provide any additional information which would be helpful to your analysis of the issues raised, I will be more than happy to do so. Thank you for your interest and attention to this request. Very truly yours, LAW OFFICES OF JANET L. COOPER t JANET L COOPER JANET L. COOPER JLC:vs 84-1320 14-234-1 Mrs. Lucia Allen -Dougherty November 15, 1984 Page 3 cc: Mayor Maurice Ferre Commission J. L. Plummer Commissioner Demetrio Perez Commissioner Miller Dawkins Commissioner Joe Carollo Ralph Ongie, City Clerk (for inclusion in the file) Marjorie Stoneman Douglas Linda Dann Marilyn Reed Mary Terese Delate M - 84-1320 C + f M1 ] h s < 0 SC �w} [L �'0 =Rl D 1, F VENUE GRAND AVENUE IN, T==-- - - .w BISCAYNE SAY LOCATION MAP OF COCONUT GROVE CENTER FOR COMMODORE BAY DEVELOPEMENT cn ...... ... . l-k 4. Thl c —.1 lo, Dk-- ..y ,j. CoconutSO-1 ImecEll —,IF -1 E3...... 1- off". 4 R-1 R-ij.-CiAl 0 CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA T�CC INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM City Clerk TO; Heritage Conservation Board DATE: October 16, 1984 FILE: r FROM: Rodhiguez, Director P ning Director 9LINJECT: Commodore Bay Development Proposal WEPENCES: ENCLOSURES: At the City Commission Meeting of September 20th, The Commodore Bay Development proposal was approved on first reading for its request to change the zoning to Planned Development —Mixed Use. The Commission approval did, however, include a change from a one lane, one way entrance road from Main Highway and a two lane exit through St. Stephens Church property to McFarlane Road, to only a two lane, two way road to Main Highway. This constitutes a change in the plans reviewed conceptually by the Board in June. The attached diagram illustrates the extent and impact of such a change on the trees within the hammock which is a preservation district. Of concern to this Department was whether this change constituted a substantial difference in plans and environmental impact on the hammock 'to such a degree that the Heritage Conservation Board's initial endorsement of the plan concept would be compromised. At stake is the number of trees that would have to be removed or relocated to accommodate the changes. We have concluded that the project concept remains essentially unchanged, that this new two lane road does not affect the question of a zoning change and that the hammock is not substantially affected for the following reasons: 1. Because St. Stephens Church has recently decided that under no circumstances will any development on the Commodore Bay site be permitted to use Church property for access purposes, all future uses of the subject property will require at least a two lane access road from Main Highway. Thus the new requirement for a two lane road stands apart from any question of how the site is used. The question to be resolved by the Heritage Conservation Board is where a two lane road should be located within the hammock, not if it is needed. 2. The principal structures (residential/commercial) are not changed, except for a reduction in height intended to preserve views from the Barnacle. Therefore, the concept remains the same as presented to you. Page 1 of 2 H- 84-1320 Heritage Conservation Board 3= The widening of the access road from one lane to two lanes will mean an additional eight to ten feet of pavement width, curb to curb, and twenty feet overall final width. The attached map shows in light grey the original one lane road and in dark grey the additional roadway width for the two lane road. This widening would likely require the relocation of ten trees. By not building the Road to McFarlane, four trees do not have to be relocated or destroyed. The net change from the original plan you reviewed is that an additional six trees would have to be relocated out of approximately 200 in the hammock. In addition, the developer has committed to adding fifty to one hundred new native hardwood hammock trees to replace weed trees and exotics that threaten the hammocks ecological balance. Pedestrian sidewalks through the hammock would leave all trees in place. At some time in the future, a right turn storage lane may need to be added to the access drive at the Main Highway exit. This would affect one additional tree. 4, Due to elimination of the alternate access drive to Main Highway, which was to be located on St. Stephens Church property adjacent to the wooden artists pavilions, the footprint of the artists pavilions will need to be adjusted to accommodate a pedestrian walkway along the property line. As shown on the second attachment, those changes would involve no additional tree removal or relocation. In fact, numerous trees could be preserved within the pedestrian walkway area, which were previously approved for removal or relocation. We stress that all detailed plans will have to be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Conservation Board before building permits are issued. To postpone the zoning change second reading before the Commission so that your Board could reconsider its approval in concept was not considered necessary. SR/JLL/mv Page 2 of 2 84-1320 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II IIII II IIIIJIIIII IIIIIIIIIII Ih I III IIIIIIIIIIIIIII111111 H III 1 II I�IIII Illlld IIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIII1111111111111!IIIIIIIIIIIIIII�._ i®M. T� N i CRAFT GUILDS AND SHOPS IN WOODEN PAVILLIONS fl•. � ,�'• �i�3I. •�J � .,fl; li �litia 1- I�r� 1 �1 .'1111 1,. (��'� i�� •� :::: • • [ L1} * • . }� • • 0 • r- • l 1 J� • • r y/1 ® •• • d �TV�'S AY RO�D,r • P O S 1 8 L E F U T U R E ENTRANCE AND EXIT FROM M O F A R L A N D ROAD • - - � o 7 •3;'q i '? 395 RAMP DOWN TO UNDERGROUND' P A R K A A go- V, 0.5 1 :tea......... .. :..; 0410 x 1> L X -fao)(z #.+to :�6+ W42-\ GbiT X*Z,111 1 27(o s z�q(D alb. 0 ZIP? •ZO n7L 4-00 ez?+ Za :50D 6=7 0=9 02arb WAM TRFE5 -M A\ -Z?o 2.2- CZ51 0_1 2�9 IV 2 *24P5zi =:7-z5 . . . . . . ..... I *Xao .2-io ZAI " . .. .... .. �777777��7'�Z7 024-1 ?9 . ..... gal FOTEOTAL AIDPMOFJP�L -WRN LME T R E E S T 0 R E M A I N NO 19 X. X&O 9 190 *192 10* i9=5 G R161 N,,f\L ff-,-'e55 JROAP Ij�j TWO LANE A4CE�S TKOAD - PJI*09N)Q6N -fbN i 0 CITY OF MIAMI HERITAGE CONSERVATION BOARD - AGE14DA - RALPIi G. U\Glt City Clerk Meeting of Tuesday, October 16, 1984 3:00 PM ' City Hall, 3500 Pan American Drive, Dinner Key I. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance II. Roll Call III. Approval of Minutes from September 18, 1984 IV. Public Hearing Items 1. Bayfront Park of the Americas, Biscayne Boulevard Public hearing concerning recorrniiendati ons to the City Manager, pursuant to Chapter 59 of the City Code, concerning tree removal and tree relocation related to the Bayside Specialty Center within Bayfront Park of the Americas, downtown Miami. 2. Ingraham Building, 25 S.E. 2nd Avenue Recommendation concerning historic site designation and application of Section 1610. HC-1: General Use Heritage Conservation Overlay District, pursuant to Article 16 of Ordinance 9500, Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. *This item was continued from the meeting of September 18, 1984. 3. Old U.S. Post Office and Courthouse, s venue Recommendations concerning historic site designation and application of Section 1610. HC-1: General Use Heritage Conservation Overlay District, pursuant to Article 16 of Ordinance 9500, Zoning Ordinance of the City i of Miami, Florida, as amended. i *This item was continued from the meeting of September 18, 1984. i l Meeting Date: October 16, 1984 Page 2 4, J.W. Warner House, 111 S.W. 5th Avenue Recommendations concerning an amendment to the historic site designation of the J.W. Warner House, 111 S.W. 5th Avenue, and application of Section 1612. HC-3: Residential -Office Heritage Conservation Overlay District, pursuant to Article 16 of Ordinance 9500, Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. 5. J.W. Warner House, 111 S.W. 5th Avenue Application for Certificate of Appropriate- ness for construction of a parking lot located within the proposed amendment to the above historic site within an HC-3: Residential -Office Heritage Conservation Overlay District. 6. Pan American Terminal Building, 3500 Pan American Drive Application for a Certificate of Appropriate- ness alterations and additions to the above historic site within an HC-l: General Use Heritage Conservation Overly District. 7. Proposed work program for historic preserva- tion from September 1984 to July 1985. 8. Consideration of a resolution authorizing the Heritage Conservation Officer to issue a Standard Certificate of appropriateness for alterations and additions to non-contributing buildings within historic districts and adopting guides and standards governing such actions. V. Old Business 84-1320 Meeting Date: October 15, 1984 Page 3 �LP11 C, p�G1E C•iq' CI¢Fk V1. New Business 1. The Variety Shop/The Great A&P Tea Co. 3033-35 Grandvenue 3 { Pre -application conference for a Certificate ' of Appropriateness for alterations and partial demolition of the above historic site located 5 within an HC-1: General Use Heritage Conser- vation Overlay District. 2. Discussion of properties on Biscayne Boulevard within the proposed Morningside Historic District. V11. Adjournment i 5 3 1 i 1 f 84-1320 ? METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA i October 23, 1984 OFFICE OF COUNTY MANAGER COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT HISTORIC PRESERVATION WARNER PLACE RM.1't t �;. (1.\IiIE Qty Clerk 111 S.W. 5th AVENUE, SUITE 101 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33130 (305) 545.4228 Ms. Joyce Meyers City of Miami Planning Department 275 N.W. 2nd Avenue Miami, FL. 33130 Dear Joyce: As per our telephone conversation of October 23, 1984, I am including information relative to the Dade Historic Survey of the property tract north of the Barnacle. Two archeological components exist on the property - one historic and the other prehistoric. The prehistoric component is part of Da9, a shallow black dirt midden that exists beneath the fill near the bayshore. Other as of yet, undetected, compo- nents of this prehistoric site might exist in the uplands area of the tract. This might include human burials - particularly in association with several solution holes on the property. The historic component is represented by artifacts associated with the mid -nineteenth century -occupation associated with the Beasley home. Any development of this property needs to be subjected to archeological monitoring. Please include that as part of the conditions for development. Specify that any earthmoving, clearing, tree removal, ditch digging will have to include prior notice to the county archeologist to allow for monitoring. Further, any filling of the large solution holes on the property should be preceded by some archeological testing or the filling of the solution holes should be avoided altogether. Obviously, I will work cooperatively with any developer, and in a way as to avoid, whenever possible, delays and obstruction to their construction schedule. Sincerely, q4'�� Robert S. Carr Archeologist Historic Preservation Division 84-1320 �OOD1.10= SLL__ Ili iji:is ltnl•�tc�1�t 1':�ittic�v.�, Jii. September 28, 1984 19h OCT -Z l; i ID 59 HAND DELIVERED : _.i . The City of Miami c/o planning Department 275 N.W. Second Street Miami, Florida 33233-0708 Attn: Mr. Jack Luft, Chief, Urhan Design Division Ike: city of MiZ-ani; PIanni.ng Department; t Proposed ] Commodore lay; Certain Mattel s Rec aiding School Children �G Ladies and Gentlemen: ;/ Following the lengthy Commission meeting and hearing hold on Thursday, September 20, 1984 relative to the (proposed) Commodore Bay development ("Commodore Bay"), it is evident that, as discussed by a majority of the members of the Commission, certain material items remain for substantive planning, consideration, and decision including, without limitation, the miY.ed i-natters of density/hanunock destruction/traffic impact; and it is of some interest to consider whether a solution or solutions can be found and recommended by you to the Commission as being in the public interest. Nevertheless, and to the extent, no matter how proximate or remote, that a proposal will be made and that the application will proceed on to the second hearing, I am writing and personally c?:?liver_r.cJ t>,� s ? c' tc_ �n cracr, e; rr.cstly : nu respectfully, to request but also to demand that on an immediate and affective basis you consider and protect the rightful and legitimate interests and needs of the children who attend and who will hereafter attend (in years junior kindergarten through sixth grade) the St. Stephen's Episcopal Day School (the "School") located adjacent to the k 84-1320 a 16 0 City of Miami September 28, 1984 Page 2 northerly boundary of Commodore westerly c. 625 feet thereof. Bay along the Obviously, Commodore Bay is a large undertaking which will take several years to construct and which, subsequent to its opening, will attract large numbers of people. It is -4ncsc•,pable that, both during the construction process and during the operation of the project, there will, among other things, be generated along the transportation corridor on the west end of the project site (which directly and closely abutts the buildings in which the School is situated) considerable noise, noxious fumes, and visual distractions. It is likewise the case that, during the normal daylight and other operations of this development which is being tailored to adult interests, large numbers of people will be attracted daily; and, as is the course of human conduct, some of whom will act with propriety and circumspection while some of whom will act in various loud, disorderly, and related fashions. None of the above situations is conducive to the learning process or to the health, safety and welfare of children of, indeed, tender age. Although there appears under these circumstances to be no panacea, it would nonetheless seem evident that it would be highly desirable and it is therefore requested: 1. That any roadways, pedestrian walkways, and any buildings of Commodore Bay be required (expressly and specifically by the Major Use Special Permit and as a condition of the proposed re -zonings and the granting of the Major Uses Special 8,4--1320 l City of Miami September 28, 1984 Page 3 Permit) to be located as much as possible within (and not on the northerly edge of) the hammock and toward the southerly boundary of the Commodore Bay lands, i.e., away from the School, and, in any event, 2. That the developer he required (expressly and specifically by the Major Use Special Permit and as a condition of the proposed re -zonings and the granting of the Major Uses special Permit) to build at the developer's expense and as a pre -condition to the commencement of any and all other construction on the Commodore Bay site a substantial, continuous masonry or coral rock wall of not less than ten (10) to twelve (12) feet in heighth along and on the entire northerly boundary of the Commodore Bay lands %•.hich abutt the St. Stephen's property. The rightful and Legitimate educational and health, safety and welfare interests and needs of our community's children must be considered and protected by the governmental process which is, under your direct supervision, guidance and; responsibility, occurring. I, together with others who can bring various helpful professional skills to bear, am available at your convenience to meet further at any reasonable location and as often is as reasonably necessary on this matter. 84-1320 J i, } / City of Miami September 28, 1984 Page 4 Your prompt written response to the above is requested. Verl truly yours, Huuer R. Parsons, Jr. W/st ' cc: Mayor Maurice A. Ferre Vice Mayor Demetrio Perez, Jr. ' Commissioner James Carollo Commissioner Miller Dawkins Commissioner J. L. Plummer Mr. Howard Gary, City Manager Mr. Sergio Rodriguez, Director, Planning Department Messrs. K. Treister, H. Scharlin, and G. Katcher Attn: Mr. Kenneth Treister, A.I.A. 84-1320 _ 7 t Sf:- �ft`'rfl the At. iiev CA:vAst+HiSF 00. Jp , 3'T�ti; 525 N E 151h Street Miami Flonda 33132 (305) 3'r 3-0881 November 5, 1984 Mayor Maurice Ferre City of Miami City Hall. 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, FL 33133 Dear 14ayor Ferre: It has come to my attention that a group of people attached to St. Stephen's Episcopal Day School in Coconut Grove have requested that an eight -foot wail be placed on the south side of St. Stephen's Church property on the property which belongs to the developer, Mr. Ken Treister. This wall, although not on St. Stephen's property, would have a profound effect on the church site. If you will recall, I calve before the City CorrT,is<ion to say that the Diocese of Southeast Florida would not grant perriission to St. Stephen's Church to grant an easement to Mr. Treister for his project - this was several weeks ago. At the present time, that is not the question. The problem is that Mr. Treister is rrjt in favor of this hall, as I understand it, and I know that the people of St. Stephen's Church 4;ould prefer not to have such a wall since their primary concern is that tar. Treister's development would enhance the harrrmock south of the church; the wall would be another barrier to the openness of the natural surroundings. What concerns me, primarily, is, however, that the people who are requesting this wall have no legal right to do so in the name of St. Stephen's Church. They are parents of children %,;ho attend St, Stephen's Day School, but. they are not co,iTunicants of St. Stephen's Church. The only body that has a legal right to request that wall is the Vestry of St. Stephen's Church as it is presently constituted. This is by Canon Law of the Diocese of Southest Florida. I send this leiter and to your commissioners to let them know that St. Stephen's Church opposes the wall and has not, in any way, shape or form, requested it, through the Vestry of the congregation. The school is a part of the church, and anything requested should go through the Vestry and not through people outside of the parish. Thank you for your attention to this matter, and I hope that the proper steps will be taken. COS:nbm cc: City Commissioners Tha Ppv Al1pn P. Ninn-,tnn Sinc your "�� T Calvin 0. Schofield, Jr., �ishop 84--13 0 f? 777 / mil✓ lYl�i f (C �W'1 Y �t tl�� October 5, 1984 CERTIFIED MAIL-R.R.R. Mr. Kenneth Treister 2699 S. Bayshore Drive Miami, Florida 33133 Re: Proposed Commodore Bay Project - Approximately 3471 Main Highway, Miami, Florida Dear Mr. Treister: l9B� GC i - ° i'17 3: Op, Pursuant to my October 3, 1984 telephone conference with Jack Luft of the City of Miami Planning Depart- ment, I requested that access to the above -referenced property be permitted to a professor of botany for purposes of examining the hammock and other trees on the above -referenced property and for purposes of determining the impact on the hammock and trees of the Commodore Bay Project development proposal. Mr. Luft has asked that I contact you for purposes of gaining such access. By this letter, I request that access to the above -referenced property be provided to me and an expert so that a study of the potential impact of your development proposal may be conducted. As the Commodore Bay Project proposal will come on for hearing before the City Commission on October 25, 1984, I request that you communicate to me at your earliest possible convenience a date and time on which access will be provided to the property and the name of the person from your group who will coordinate access with me. As you know, many large beautiful live oak trees directly abut the driveway access to the property. Further, the construction of the artist facilities in the hammock will also necessitate the removal -of numerous trees. This request is made so that a full and fair discussion of the i 84--1320 impact of the development proposal on the hammock can be had at the October 25, 1984 City Commission meeting and the heritage Conservation Board Meeting which I understand is to be held subsequent to the final read- ing before the City Commission. ncerely 1 Davi . cCrea l 371-2600 DBM/rn cc Honorable Maurice Ferre Honorable Demetrio Perez, Jr. Honorable Joe Carollo Honorable Miller Dawkins Honorable J. L. Plummer, Jr. Jack Luft, Planning Department r I i r i r r 84-1320 �08 2 c c.m 9_t4_ HAND -DELIVERY November 1, 1984 Howard R. Scharlin, Esq. Katcher, Scharlin & Lanzetta United National Bank Building 1399 S.W. Ist Avenue Miami, Florida 33130 Re: Proposed Commodore Bay Project -Approximately 3471 Main Highway, Miami, Florida Dear Mr. Scharlin: Pursuant to my October 5, 1984 letter to Kenneth Treister (which the receipt shows was received on October 9, 1984), I requested that access to the above -referenced property be permitted to a professor of botany for purposes of examining the hammock and other trees thereon and for purposes of determining the impact on the hammock and trees of the Commodore Bay Project development proposal. As you know, the final hearing on your development proposal was set for October 25, 1984. Nevertheless, your group waited until October 23, 1984 to respond to my request. Obviously, the time then remaining before the scheduled hearing was very short and insufficient to make arrangements for our expert to conduct a study. At that time, I informed you that the professor of botany was not available on such short notice and proposed that another qualified expert be permitted access to the property. In response to my request for the substitute expert to be permitted access, you denied such access and stated that "no useful purpose" would be served by such person examining the hammock, apparently upon the grounds that you felt the expert was not "qualified". By this letter, I renew my request for access to be permitted to the property to a qualified expert for purposes of examining the hammock and other trees thereon and for purposes of determining the impact on the hammock and trees of the Commodore Bay Project development proposal. As I understand the matter will now come on 84-1320 u Howard R. Scharlin, Esq. Katcher, Scharlin & Lanzetta November 1, 1984 Page 2 for hearing on November 15, 1984, I request that you contact me to arrange a mutually convenient time between November 5, 1984 and November 13, 1984 for a qualified expert to be provided access to the property. I cannot guarantee that the professor of botany will be available to examine the property at a time convenient to you. You may, however, rest assured that any person we would propose to examine the property will have a background sufficient to qualify him to render an opinion on the matter. In any event, the City Commission, and not the developer, should be permitted the opportunity to decide whether our expert is "qualified". In view of the environmentally sensitive nature and historical significance of the property you propose to develop, it is critical that others be provided access to the property so that a full and fair discussion of the impact of the development proposal on the property can be had at the November 15, 1984 City Commission meeting. The need for access to the property is especially critical in view of the position of the City of Miami Planning Department that the development proposal will not be presented to the Heritage Conservation Board, prior to the City Commission Meeting. 'ncerel , David B. cCrea C� 371-2600 DBM/mr ✓ cc: The Hon. Maurice Ferre The Hon. Demetrio Perez, Jr. The Hon. Joe Carollo The Hon. Miller Dawkins The Hon. J. L. Plummer, Jr. Jack Luft, Planning Department 84-1320 i KA• (-,IIER, CIIAI?7AN AND LANZETTA ATTORNEYS AT LAW = UNITED NATIONAL BANK PUILOING = 1399 S. W. f IRST AVENUE �TIADlI, Pl•UHII)A :3:11:30 GERALD KATGHER fiELEpHONE 358•4222 HOWARO A. SCHARLIN AREA CODE 305 JOHN A. LANZETTA { November 13j 1984 ✓y �J The Hon. Maurice Ferre y _� The Hon. Demetrio Perez, Jr. _ The Hon. Joe Carollo The Hon. Miller Dawkins - w The Hon J. L. Plummer,_ Jr. Miami, Florida Be: Proposed Commodore Bay Project, � approximately 3471 Main Highway, Coconut Grove, Florida. Gentlemen: on November 1, 1984 I received a letter from David B. McCrea, with copies to each of you, requesting permission for access to the subject property by a qualified hammock expert. For your information, we contacted Mr. McCrea on Tuesday, November 6, by telephone and advised him that we were prepared to have a hammock expert examine the property. Mr. McCrea was to contact us with the name of the expert and, assuming that the person was reasonably qualified, early arrangements for physical inspection would be made. I believe that our phone conversation was friendly in tone, with a real effort on both sides to communicate with understanding of the other's position. Mr. McCrea called me on Wednesday and suggested that a meeting to further discuss the project might he helpful. I met with him and with Mr. Huber R. Parsons on November 8 and we again discussed the project and their concerns. We made it clear at that meeting that they were welcome to bring a qualified expert to view the property. They acknowledged that they understood my concern as to the qualifications of their expert. They promised early advice as to who they would propose as their candidate. 84-1320 The Hon. Maul -ice Ferre The Hon. Demetrio Perez, Jr. ME The Hon. Joe Carollo a The Hon. Miller Dawkins ' The Hon. J. L. Plummer, Jr. Mr. Jack Luft, Planning Department November 13, 1984 Page 2 �_ On Friday Mr. McCrea identified the expert he had -chosen. On Monday we accepted his choice and agreed to �. on site inspection this afternoon. I regret having placed you in the middle of a letter -writing campaign. Kenneth Treister and I _-_- appreciate your patient consideration of our project. Very truly yours,IE /0- rd R.r, Scharlin HRS:ps cc: David B. McCrea, Esq. Huber R. Parsons, Esq. i a 84-1320 s. y1 i f i KENNETH TREISTER are hileeI 1,11'Y J' ."";," .. 1964 &'_ Ctt 2: , 1 October 16, 1984 J/rr► Mr. Sergio Rodriguez, Director City of Miami Planning Department 275 NW 2nd St. Miami F1. 33128 Re: Commodore Bay Hammock Area Dear Sergio: Part of our efforts that we have always promised concerning the environment at Commodore Bay are the restoration and revitalization of the hammock. According to our hammock expert, George Allen, the hammock is badly deteriorated and needs restoring. To this end, we are submitting an outline of his preliminary restoration program. We will be happy to make this outline part of the conditions for approval. We will also make a commitment that if any of the relocated trees do not make it during transplanting, we will replace them with r-qual size trees. We will prepare the detailed plans for the restoration of the hammock as part of our final working drawings which will be submitted to the Heritage Board, Building Department, and other government agencies prior to the issuance of any permit. Si Ke KT:H enclosures cc: Howard Scharlin (w/encs) Jack Luft (w/encs) Taft Bradshaw (w/encs) ,George Allen 84-1320 990A .C. RRvchnrA T)rivp r.nrnnwf r:rnvo FlnrMa •2`tl'i't Ar__Iq �11R A 2 11cull's nkfffammock NInC09 Spcc icrli_irr,�� in Villive I7urida Flunr and Srloo Shade Plum., Telephone (305)247-5514 October 150 1984 Mr, Kenneth Treister 2699 Bayshore Drive Miami, F1. 33133 Re: Commodore Bay Dear Mr. Treister: Post Office Box 224 Homestead. Florida 33030 This is an update on my continuing detailed study of the hammock area of the above -referenced project. First, I would like to reiterate the basic conclusions that I found in my earlier report to you, which was presented by me to the City of Miami Heritage Board. Firstly, this is not an undisturbed virgin hammock. It has been damaged by some clearing, and badly invaded by exotics, both from landscaping and encrochment of undesirable fast - spreading species which have escaped cultivation. Lastly, the present condition of the hammock is such that if left un- disturbed it will continue to deteriorate to the point that it will no longer be a hammock. It will die. To revitalize this hammock, we are planning to : a. Remove the troublesome exotics; b. Clean up the entire area. c. Prune dead limbs, and shape some of the trees; d. Plant a considerable amount of new native plant material. The list of this planting is attached. I have reviewed with Taft Bradshaw, our landscape architect, the final schematic plans that were presented to the City Commission. These indicated some wider roadways, sidewalks, etc., and find that they would create no substantial changes to the hammock or its restoration. These muodifications result in minor relocation, and do not affect the overall hammock. Of the approximately 250 trees in the hammock that we plan to save, the adjustment will only cause about 12 to be relocated. Four other trees that would have had to be removed by the road going through to McFarlane will now remain, thus making the net difference in relocated trees only 8. 84-1320 1� �1 . �Hammock Nursery, he. Sprriaii_inp icc Native Florida Elm -a and Sclerl Shady Plants Telephone Post Office Box 224 (305)247-5514 Homestead. Florida 33030 (2) In addition to this relocation, which we would guarantee,we l will be planting approximately 15 major trees, 35 smaller trees, 200 additional shrubs, and several hundred ground cover plants 1 in this hammock area. While we can commit to the restoration and revitalization pro- gram, the exact definitive plan will be completed as part of the final working drawings for the entire project. The final definitive plan will be submitted to the Heritage Board and to other city agencies prior to our receiving the building permit. Sincerely, George E. Allen 84-1320 a A 21 Ilen's U'Oranallock Nursery, Inef) Stu , rali=i►► in Nfaire b7orida l7/two and Sc/rrt Shady Plants Telephone (305)247-5514 Post Office Box 224 Homestead, Florida 33030 HAMMOCK PLANTING FOR COMMODORE BAY The program for restoration and revitalization of the hammock would involve the following procedures: 1) Removal of the troublesome exotic plants. 2) The planting of additional large hammock trees to add to the upper canopy of the hammock. This probably would consist of about 15 trees of such species as Live Oak, Gumbo Limbo, Mastic etc. 3) The secondary planting would be of slightly smaller trees, to effect a secondary canopy under the high canopy of the oaks etc. This would be accomplished by planting such trees as Red Stopper, Inkwood, Bahama Strongback, Willow Bustic, Black Ironwood, West Indian Cherry etc., probably totaling about 35 trees which would create the secondary canopy of the hammock. 4) We would then consider the addition of the understory shrubs such as Wild Coffee, Simpson Stopper, Marlberry, Myrcine, Spicewood etc. These would total approximately 200 additional plants in this catagory. 5) Finally, especially in and around the solution hole, probably the center of attraction to visitors, we would go with ground covers of fern,9Boston & Sword fern) Oval Leaf Peperomia, Coonties etc. This would entail the planting of about 200 to 300 ground cover plants, depending on the final plan. Some bromelliads might be placed in the trees if pilfering could be controlled. Considering the poor condition of the hammock at present, I feel that the plans for development as outlined will greatly enhance the viability of it, and prevent, rather than cause its destruction. The net result would be a bit of South Florida, accessable to many who otherwise would never see the subtle beauty of our native hammocks. �i��°� 84-1320 Ok 2i KENNETH TRUSTER architect 1964 (an'/r`1 =: � 3 N November 7, 1984 `� .• ;""_'. --- Mr. Sergio Rodriguez, Director (, �• Miami Planning Department 275 NW 2nd St. i" ' Miami, Fl. 33128 i Re: Commodore Bay Dear Sergio: At the September 20 Commission hearing on Commodore Bay, several commissioners requested we provide a secondary access road. Since then, we have met on this request with the Planning Department and their development order now requires that this road be constructed by the developer at any time the City requests. Enclosed is a site plan which provides the secondary access road suggested by the Commission. As developers, we will build this second access road when the project is created or requested by the City. If you have any questions, please call me. I n erely, ' •:•n«u�+tt K nneth Treister KT:H enclosure Distribution: The Honorable Mayor Maurice Ferre The Honorable Vice Mayor Demetrio Perez Jr. The Honorable Commissioner Miller Dawkins The Honorable Commissioner J. L. Plummer The Honorable Commissioner Joe Carollo Mr. Jack Luft, Miami Planning Department f = 814 1320 2699 S. Bayshore Drive Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 858-241G W KENNETH TRUSTER architecI Cit. Y If III ISN OCT 22 PM 137 October 19, 1984 Mr. Donald W. Cather, Director City of Miami Public Works 275 NW 2nd St. Miami F1. 33128 Re: Commodore Bay Dear Don: It has come to my attention that there is a discrepancy between our survey prepared by Biscayne Engineering Co. and the original surveys done by the City of Miami in that there is an overlap of a sliver of land along our common boundary near the bay side. I spoke to George Campbell about this and it seems there is an honest disagreement between the two surveys as to who owns this triangular sliver of land. I would suggest the following as a method of resolving this question. 1. We have an independent surveyor hired at our cost but selected by the Public Works Department, City of Miami, to go over the original records, monuments, etc. and determine who owns that sliver of land. 2. If the sliver of land is found to belong to the City of Miami and Peacock Park, then our plat will show this and our survey would be corrected. 2698 S.Bayshore Drive Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 858-2416 84-2320 . 3. If it is found that the sliver of land belongs to us, we would then give the city the following two alternates: a. We would grant the City by form of a deed restriction or other permanent covenant suggested by the City Attorney, permanent use of that sliver of land for recreational purposes as part of Peacock Park and we would agree not to use that sliver of land. b. We would give the City of Miami at no cost to the City a quitclaim deed for that sliver of land provided the City allows us to use that land in our calculations and setbacks for our proposed development. We feel that the above suggestions are the fairest ways to determine first the actual ownership and secondly, they assure the City of continuous use of this property whether it owns the land or not. If this meets with your approval, we would be happy to make this proposal a part of our major use special permit written document which is being prepared by Mr. Luft and would be binding upon us. SVn96/rely, Kinneth Treister KT:H cc: George Campbell Jack Luft s • lot CITY OF MIAKI, FLORIDA BRA rcrr ICE MEMORANDUM 04 .' r•f - TO Jack Luft by►TE October 12, 19$4 FILE. Planning Department ; ----� - �'�� SUBJECT Commodore Bay Project FROM David H. Teems, Deputy Chief REFERENCES Fire, Rescue & Inspection Services Department ENCLOSURES - It is my understanding that several areas of concern were raised in the public hearing regarding the Fire Department and the problems we can anticipate with this project. Since the primary problem we can anticipate early on are the Water Main Improvements necessary to provide the proper fire flow, it is my suggestion that a meeting take place between yourself, Public Works and the Fire Marshal, Chief Duke, to discuss and understand what has to be done prior to the second hearing. In addition to the water main question, there are several other issues raised by the Fire Marshal which would have to be considered; 1. The potential for the Marina to be located at the bayside. 2. The question of access for heavy equipment which may necessitate or have a bearing on sprinkler systems be required for the entire project. All of these issues are of course heavy cost items and the City will have to take a unified stand on it prior to the next public hearing. If further information is required from this Department, please con- tact Chief Duke. DHT:lb cc: George Campbell, Public Works Dept. Chief Duke Santiago Jorge -Ventura Inspection Services file Reading file 84-1320 i® on TREISTER & CA►NTILLO ARCHITECTS October 15, 1984 Lieutenant Pete Rhodes CITY OF MIAMI FIRE DEPARTMENT 275 N.W. 2nd Street Miami, FL 33233 CfIr rs�a oc r , Re: PROPOSED COMMODORE BAY DEVELOPMENT - FIRE ISSUES Dear Lieutenant Rhodes: During a meeting held in your office last Thursday, October llth, with Mr. Calpini, Mr. Phelps, Mr. Kimec, you and myself, we discussed, in general, the proposed Commodore Bay development and your preliminary comments concerning fire related issues. Based on this meeting, we are prepared to make the following committments on behalf of the owners, Mr. Treister, Mr. Scharlin and Mr. Katcher regarding the design and implementation of Commodore Bay: 1) We agree to make the water main improvements as specified by the City of Miami Fire Department and the Dade County Water and Sewer Department, which involves increasing the size of the existing water lines from the 30" main on 27th Avenue on South Bayshore Drive to our project in order to deliver adequate pressure at the end of our project for the the fire hydrants. 2) We agree that we will supply five (5) fire hydrants on our property, one siamese connection at the Main Highway corner of our property, two (2) pressurized manifolds at the water's edge of our property, all in accordance with the location and specifications of the City of Miami Fire Department. We further agree that if the emergency vehicle access through the park bay -walk comes to fruition, we will add a hydrant by the.northeast corner of our property next to the park access. 3) We understand that the garage has to have sprinklers to meet the building code and we agree to sprinkler the garage with appropriate fire department connections that are required. KENNETH TREISTER & ANTONIO CANI ILLO 2699 South Balshone Dry Suite 1000 D, Coconut Grove, Fla. 33133 — Phone (305) 368-24I G : 1 84--I3�O w Lieutenant Pete Rhodes CITY OF MIAMI FIRE DEPARTMENT Page Two October 15, 1984 4) We understand from you that sprinklering is not required for the retail and apartment components, but it is strongly recommended by your department. We will have to study this issue further considering the total building design before we can make a decision regarding this matter. 5) We understand that your department sees no problem with emergency vehicle access to our project through the two (2) lane access road as long as the clearance height underneath the bridge is a minimum of 12'. 6) The radius at the turn around at the end of the street is of sufficient size to enable your trucks to turn around. 7) The roadway through the project will have to be designed to with- stand the loading of your heaviest trucks and we will design this slab to meet your requirements. The required loading weight is currently H-20. 8) The adjacent property immediately to the northeast of the wooden pavillions of the Hammock area of our site is a dedicated fire lane belonging to St. Stephen's Episcopal Church and, therefore, this space will remain open. 9) The fire hydrants occurring in our street over the main structure will be private hydrants which we, as the owners, will maintain according to the City of Miami Fire Department and Dade County Water & Sewer Departments directions and approvals. We appreciate your time in reviewing our plans and working with us in developing this project. If you have any questions concerning this project or if I can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. %ar l . Trei ter CT:gh cc: John Calpini - City of Miami Fire Department Charles Phelps - City of Miami Fire Department George Campbell - City of Miami Public Works Department Jack Luft - City of Miami Planning Department Rick Herrera - Dade County Water & Sewer Department 84-1320 1l Ga 0 CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO. Jack Luft, Chief Urban Design Planning Department FROM Chief . H. Duke, Fire Marshal Fire Prevention Bureau Fire, Rescue & Inspection Services Department -- ----------- a DATE Octo r 17, 1984 FILE: SUBJECT Corot-4--arfl' Project REFERENCES ENCLOSURES The Fire Department has approved the concept of one access road in and out of the proposed Commodore Bay Project at 3461-3471 Commodore Plaza (Main Highway and Commodore Plaza). At a meeting on October 11, 1984 dimensions of fire apparatus and the required turning radius was given to Mr. Charles Treister, Architect. This single access road will of course be two (2) lanes and of ade- quate width and to accomodate our largest fire apparatus and be de- signed to support the heaviest apparatus. The cul-de-sac shall have sufficient turning area and all trees and overpasses must have ade- J METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA �4 ftAKW1ftf f PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BRICKELL PLAZA BUILDING 1984 SEP 24 PM 1: 33 FOURTH FLOOR 909 S E 1ST AVENUE DADE MIAMI. FLORIDA 33131 September 20, 1984 Mr. Jack Luft City of Miami Planning Department 275 N.W. 2 Street Miami, FL 33128 Re: Commodore Bay Development Proposal Dear Mr. Luft: As you recently requested verbally, we have performed a cursory review of the "Commodore Bay Traffic Study" dated August 16, 1984, by David Plummer and Associates, and have discussed a subsequent study with the consultant engineer for the project. Due to vour constraints on roadway improvements (ie. - no stripping of parking to create additional traffic lanes on Main Highway and Commodore Plaza), the proposed signalized intersection of Main Highway and Commodore Plaza with this development would operate at Level of Service "E" during the P.M. peak hours regardless of whether or not a secondary access is provided to McFarlane Road. While the McFarlane Road access is advantageous as a relief valve, it would not have a significant effect on the operation of the aforementioned intersection. This intersection, currently unsignalized, is reported to be operating at Level of Service "E". Signalizing it would improve pedestrian and vehicular safety in that vehicles from Commodore Plaza could proceed to Main Highway on their j own signal phase as opposed to forcing their way into the traffic flow and pedestrians could have an unencumbered crosswalk across Commodore Plaza instead of walking around stacked vehicles.Any development on this site would cause a negative impact on Main Highway. The greater the development, the greater the impact. In conclusion, the Main Highway/Commodore Plaza intersection, according to the consultant engineer's report, is and will be operating at Level of Service "E" regardless of whether there is a connection to McFarlane Road or not. The connection is desirable, but not necessary. Vehicular and _ pedestrian safety would be improved with the signalization of this intersection. Another improvement which has not improve the traffic flow would be Avenue and Commodore Plaza. WMP:HB:fs been investigated but which might the installation of a signal at Grand Very truly ours, Aeo6etl�l William M. Powell Director 111A1d 84_"1320 DAVID PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES WE"' CONSULTING ENGINEERS L994 CU 22 PH 3- 35 October 19, l 9k$ft1rs-p ;t+ Mr. Sergio Rodriguez, Director City of Miami Planning Department P.O. Box 330708 Miami, Florida 33233-0708 Re: Commodore Bay - f4167 Dear Mr. Rodriquez: During the first reading for the approval of Commodore Bay several questions arose about the methods we used to collect background data and project growth for Commodore Bay. We took it upon ourselves to re -investigate our procedures and have concluded that our original analysis was proper. The first area of concern expressed at that meeting was the fact that our counts were taken in July and that seasonal variations might affect our result. We felt at that time that there might be some seasonal variations in the Ald hour, due to the fact that school is not in session in July, but it would not affect the PM peak hour. We were not concerned about the variations in the AM peak hour since our project is primarily retail uses which will not be open during that hour. We felt the July PM peak hour, the critical hour of analysis, was reasonably consistent throughout the year. To verify that we re-counted the AM and PM peak hour turning movements at the intersection of Main Highway/Grand Avenue/MacFarlane Road this week. There was virtually no difference in the PM peak hour volume counts taken in July and those taken in October. Therefore our conclusions that a signal at the intersection of Commodore Plaza and Main Highway will improve traffic operations, and the Commodore Bay turning movements are not the critical movements at that intersection, are correct. Another issue which emerged was the rate of growth that was applied to this analysis. When the project volumes are included we used a growth rate of 7 percent per year, which was compounded annually. The historic growth rate in this area is only 1.8 percent per year. Our growth rates are 380 percent greater than the historic rates and hence provide a very conservative result. 4225 SALZEDO STREET . CORAL GABLES • FLORIDA 33146 1305) "4.2116 84-1.320 ("N Mr. Sergio Rodriguez Ste: Commodore Bay - #4167 October 19, 1984 Page 2 We would appreciate an opportunity to meet with you, or other representatives of your staff, prior to the October 25th second reading on this project. It would provide the City of Miami an opportunity to review any of the elements of the traffic study that you feel are essential. Very truly yours, David S. Plummer ' DSP/vl cc: Mr. Kenneth Treister MR 84-1323 ell"; KENNETH TRUSTER architect 2699 S. Bayshore Drive Coconut Grove._ Florida 33133 858-2416 N vIILES MOSS &ASSOCIATES, INC. ConsuTn0 Engineers 12P00 S W 84 Street Miami, FI 33183 (305) 386-1212 . October 17, 1984 Mr. Kenneth Treister :2C99 South Baynhore Drive Suite 1000 Q Coconut Grove, Florida 33132 Fe: Commodore Bay Traffic Study MMA # 379 Dear Mr. Treiater: We have reviewed the report entitled "Commodore Bey Traffic Study,, , prepared key David Plummer & Associates, in August 1984.We have performed independent calculations of the existing and projected traffic conditions associated with this project. The resulta of our analysis indicate that the projections indicated in the traffic study are greater than what will occur, and thus, less total traffic will be generated by thic development. We have projected a greater number of internal trips, especialiy during the peak hours, resulting in lean projected external tripR. A review of projected (maximum) traffic useage at the intersection of Mein Highway and Commodore Plaza indicated sinimal exiting site traffic desiring to turn right, and travel northeast during the P.M. peak hour. The need or benefit of a second access road from the site to Main Highway is tliva nc.t indicated, and it is not projected that such an access will ever be needed. A review of existing and projected operating conditions at the intersection of Main Highway and Commodore Plaza was performed. Projected conditions include the installation of a traffic signal at this intersection, and the addition of future traffic projected to be generated by other approved developments in the area, and by the development of Commodore Bay. The reaults of this analysis indicate that improved operating conditons will reault with the projected conditions,. The projected signalized operation will not only reduce delays for traffic entering and exiting Commodore Plaza, but will substantially improve the level of safety at this lor-ation, especially for pedestrians. 84-1320 Expert Witness Services 0 traffic Engineering Studies fl� In summary, our review, analysis, and calculations support the conclusions described in the David Plummer. & Associates report, with projected impact less and operating conditions expected to be even better then described in this report. Very truly youra, MILES MOSS & ASSOCIATES, INC. .4 Miles E. Mcss, P.E. 84w-1320 . rN, METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA METRO DADE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BRICKELL PLAZA BUILDING FOURTH FLOOR 909 S.E 1ST AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 September 10, 1984 ` Mr. Dave Plummer, P.E. Dave Plummer b Associates, Inc. 4225 Salzedo Street Coral Gables, Florida 33146 Re: Traffic Signal Report Main Highway and Commodore Plaza Dear Mr. Plummer: We have reviewed the justification data for a traffic signal installation at the above subject location and find the report unacceptable in its present content. In an effort to provide an acceptable justification, twenty -four-hour volume counts and accidents for a minimum of one year must be submitted. Traffic projections for the new development are acceptable; however, they must reflect the impact on the existing intersection volume. It was determined that traffic on Main Highway can be effectively pEogressed with the ex sting compu na sys em. owever, your proposal or signa zing o wor in the system. The proposed signals are too close together and cannot be justified. In addition, before a review can be made, a sketch of the intersection and proposed signal phasing must be provided for our review. If you desire to discuss this matter further, we will be glad to meet with you at your convenience. CWB/DDB/em cc: Walter A. Herndon, Jr. 111A1, Z trulurs es Baldwi , Jr., P.E. Chief, Highway D ision � P? Y I934 DA','1D PLU'Xt!E,1? ASSOUWS, 1',.1r. 84-132W0 'I-, 'j DAVID PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS October 12# 19$4 Mr. Don Brammer Dade County Department of Public Works 909 Southeast First Avenue - Fourth Floor Miami, Florida 33131 Re: Commodore Bay - #4167 Signalization of Commodore Plaza/Main Highway Intersection Dear Mr. Brammer: In response to your letter of September 10, 1984, we have conducted additional twenty-four hour traffic counts along Commodore Plaza. These counts plus twenty-four hour counts for Main Highway are attached for your use. As can be seen, the eighth -highest hour on both Main Highway and Commodore Plaza exceeds the minimum vehicular requirements for Warrant 1. As soon as this project has received final approvals from the City Commission we will prepare a signal warrant study which will also include traffic accident data. Very truly yours Kahart'M. inder KMP/vl 4225 SALZEDO STREET. CORAL GABLES • FLORIDA 33146 1305) 444.2116 84-1320 PEW--' :-David Plummer. & Associates Consulting Engineers 4225 Salzedo Street Trnffa_c • Parking • Transit Coral Gables' Florida 33146 Highways Accidents Zonin_- VEHICLE COUNT RECORD FOR AUTONLATIC RECORDERS LOCATION: Rrn�n = r •c DAY: =S p ,d v DATE: STATION NO: Mach. f/li c R ,z. Street I �1 /Lane i �. uI t: I SE/1r�-T Ii TO ,L Hoer I ►uFORTHR-_ lI S( v : BoTw+-k-STOTA .I FAST- BOUNM BOi.YbD IE W TOTAL I ' 2-1A* C I' - a-� li 1 5 Q-lo-- 10-,1 ' 2-1P.M I. I .p• I� .I '{ _2 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 I) _Q - o-io 12.-12 'OTAL I li � I I Ii • vid Plummer a225 Salzedo Coral Gables, CATION: b Associates - Consulting Engineers Street T- £fic Parking . Transit Florida 33146 A.dhways Accidents • Zonir.,• VEFICLE COUNT RECORD FOR AUTOMATIC RrCORDERS ", — 1.wci ma c. _ r. L- y - i DATE: ' ( - L' STATION NO: ac}L =reet I 7Ln-. u NORTH- iis tiu- our (' pnTn *r- I BDIM I�Tle EAST- i;� `i - iY-k ti ? I B01,11, I? I ROtJ1�'D IE-W TOTAL! D -W BOU'vT - ;1 �! 1 �-S TOTM r_ f 1 6-7 I I I I I it I _, 75 i n �P . �1-12 41 1-2 2-3 17-71 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 -7 1i I: q n I' ► L ' 1 —1 2 I TA1. I I I Ii % I c,"711Y + 1�,n�� 1 t i 1 i r_ u \�� ALFRED BROWNINGRIC22FAR, ARCHITECTS CHAPTERED Poet Office Drainer 33ooz8 : % 1eZM1, rrorraa 31 #3 9 November 1984 Mayor Maurice A. Ferre City Hall, Dinner Key Miami, Florida 33133 Dear Maurice: The Commodore Bay mixed -use development and the site for which it is intended are both well known to me. This project has my wholehearted approval with no reservations. We must encourage as many citizens as ooss4hle to live in our satellite urban _ areas. Over a dozen years aco, I presented to the Chamber of Commerce a plan to revitalize downtown Miami. Housing for thousands was proposed in mega - structures to the north at the City docks property and to the south with similar housing structures over the I-95 Interchange and the land along the Miami River. Ball Point (recommended for purchase by the City) %%ould have been left open and the City docks with deeps%,ater fingers would have remained under the megastruc tares instead of being filled in for the ill-fated Bicentennial Park. This plan was well documented in the Miami Herald's Tropic Magazine January 2, 10?2. Even earlier than this a planning suggestion was advanced for developing the { Grove area along the Bay from St. Stephens Church to Ransom -Everglades Day { School. This was intended to bring people into that immediate areawith all of the urban amenities within walking distance. It could have been done and can be done in a manner that would not only preserve the Eayfront and the natural charm of the hammock growth but also introduce our com-unity to that waterfront which they have never enjoyed and, at t,.e same' t.Me, offer housing to those of moderate income. i The Commodore Bay development is an opportunity to move confidently into a future where careful planning and durable construction will not destroy our Coconut Grove heritage but rather fulfill its promise. There is no justification in criticizing the project on the basis of density. A high density within the ? immmediate confines of our Coconut Grove community would be a blessing. The very modest proposal of under two hundred residential units in Commodore Bay is a creative step into the future which I hope you will support. Sincerely, J�j ' A fre Browning Parker, FATA 'i ARP/q 84-1320 ALFRED BROWNING PARKER, ARCHITECTS CHARTER8b PoO Office Drawer 330028. M aml, Plorida 33133 9 November 1934 Mayor Maurice A. Ferre City Hall, Dinner Key Miami, Florida 33133 Dear Maurice: The Commodore Bay mixed -use development and the site for which it is intended are both well known to me. This project has my wholehearted approval with no reservations. We must encourage as many citizens as uoss;hle to live in our satellite urban areas. Over a dozen years ago, I presented to the Chamber of Commerce a plan to revitalize downtown Miami. Housing for thousands was proposed in mega - structures to the north at the City docks property and to the south with similar housing structures over the I-95 Interchange and the land along the Miami River. Ball Point (recommended for purchase by the City) ~Mould have been left open and the City docks with deepv,,ater fingers would have remained under the megastruc tures instead of being filled in for the ill-fated Bicentennial Park. This plan was well documented in the Miami Herald's Tropic Magazine January 2, 1072. Even earlier than this a planning suggestion was advanced for developing the Grove area along the Bay from St. Stephens Church to Ransom -Everglades Day School. This was intended to bring people into that immediate area with all of the urban amenities within walking distance. It could have been done and can be done in a manner that would not only preserve the Bayfront and the natural charm of the hammock growth but also introduce our com-unity to that waterfront which they have never enjoyed and, at t„e same t`.me, cf-Fer housing to those of moderate income. The Commodore Bay development is an opportunity to move confidently into a future where careful planning and durable construction will not destroy our Coconut Grove heritage but rather fulfill its promise. There is no justification in criticizing the project on the basis of density. A high density within the irrniediate confines of our Coconut Grove community would be a blessing. The very modest proposal of under two hundred residential units in Commodore Bay is a creative step into the future which I hope you will support. Sincerely, lfre Browning A P/a Parker, FATA 84-132U MAA014(1 107)( 1^�006902A3^0)PD 11/ ICS IPMMLAI MGY 0210 l 1 1-15 1003A CDT MLA9 -p ,rll c,- ICS IPMMAO? cwh 4-0091897S32G 1 1/ 15/OU4 ICS IPMMTZZ CSP 3054462355 ►DMT CCCO"W GROVE FL 32 11-15 1054A EST PMS MON MAURICE FERRE9 DLR BERFORE 3PM9 DLR CITY HALL PAN AMERICAN DR MIAMI FL 33133 PLEASE VOTE N6 T®DAY ON THE COMMODORE BAY PROJECT TO GIVE STATE OF FLORIDA A CHANCE iO BUY AND PERSERVE FOR THE PUBLIC THIS KEY PROPERTY IN THE HEART OF THE GROVE LOUIS AND NANCY HECTOR PRECINCT 941 1101 EST W.U. Ml-SF (FI6 691 f lv� MAAO17( 1119)(I—C)G7099A32())PD 11/15/84 1119 ICS IPMMLAJ MGY ) b 04901 11-15 lGGl/`A CDT MLAC p ICS IPMMA09 4-009768S320 1 1/ 15/�4 ' ICS IPMMTZZ CSP SU54466232 TDMi MIAMI FL 11 11-15 1052A EST PMS MAYOR MAURICE FERRE RPT DLY MGM, DLR CITY HALL 3500 PAN AME RICAN DR MIAMI FL 33133 PLEASE OFPOSE COMMODORE BAY PROJECT AND TRULY REPRESENT THE PUBLIC INTEREST. 14R AND MRS WALLACE COLE 3501 S T GAUDENS RD MIAMI FL 33133 W.U. 1201•SF lRS•691 Dot NEi EDV Jot BE, TEC ROI IRA Jot 00� 0111� MARSHALL S. HARRIS 472S PINE DRIVE MIAMI, FLORIDA 33143 November 13, 1984 The Honorable Maurice Ferre Mayor, City of Miami 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, Florida, 33133 Re: Commodore Bay Dear Maurice: Recently, I had the privilege of listening to some very interesting cocktail conversation concerning a zoning application pending before the City. As you probably well know, Howard Scharlin and Kenneth Treister are close personal friends of mine. Kenny and I served on the Miami Beach High debating team in 1947 and 1948. I have had the opportunity by virtue of my being up in Howard Scharlin's office to see the plans that Kenny has developed for Commodore Bay. I personally cannot imagine a nicer development for that property. The property is abutted on both sides by parks and this development would give everyone the chance to utilize the shoreline of Biscayne Bay. I find the walkway proposal very intriguing. A walkway along the shore in this area is even more appropriate then in the downtown area. I know that there are many objectors and that a major focus of their objections is traffic and congestion. Coconut Grove is congested but this project is not going to add materially to that and the beauty of the project offsets what little congestion is added. I recommend your wholehearted support of this project and hope that the City Commission endorses it unanimously. By the way, I am enjoying my service both as your arbitrator in the Cable Television dispute and as the Chairperson of the Miami Audit Advisory Committee. In both cases, I have been very impressed with the caliber of the City's professional staff. Thank you for doing me the honor of appointing me to both positions. Very cordially yours, C41S. 411arris- MSN/js 84-1320 Signed for Mr. Bierman in—fis absence to avoid-c—OAY_in mailing/delivery. DONALD I. BIERMAN NEAL R. SONNETT EDWARD R. SHOHAT JON A. SALE BENEDICT P. KUEHNE TEOFILO CHAPA ROBERT M. DUBOFF IRA N. LOEWY JOHN M. KIERNAN fi U LAW OFFICES BIERMAN, SONNETT, SHOHAT & SALE PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION FIFTH FLOOR PENINSULA FEDERAL BUILDING 200 S. E. FIRST STREET MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 TELLPHONE (305) 358-7477 November 15, 1984 Honorable Maurice A. Ferre Mayor, City of Miami and Honorable City Commission 3500 Pan American Drive Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 Gentlemen: FORT LAUDERDALE OFFICE THE ADVOCATE BUILDING SECOND FLOOR 315 S. E. SEVENTH STREET FORT LAUDERDALE. FLORIDA 33301 1305) 524 -1114 (305) 734-2520 (WEST PALM BEACHI REPLY TO: MIAMI I am writing this letter and am requesting that you read it into the record and make it a part of the official hearing with regard to the Commodore Bay Project. I am a native Miamian and have been a frequent visitor to Coconut Grove for many, many years. Coconut Grove is in fact my favorite part of Miami and I have placed a contract for the purchase of a home near Main Highway. I am familiar with the plans for Commodore Bay and have had an opportunity to briefly review them. I wish to speak out wholeheartedly in favor of this project. I believe it is consistent with the City of Miami's plan to develop an urban business section where people live, work and spend their leizure time. I have had the pleasure of visiting Porto Banus in Costa Del Sol., Spain and believe that this project will be very close to the Port project in Porto Banus. That project brings many people into the area who live on the Port and who share the life of the community. I believe that the Commodore Bay Project will have the same positive results for Coconut Grove and for the City of Miami. My wife joins me in this wholehearted endorsement of this Project. Thank you for your attention and interest in the future of the City of Miami. fncerely, DONALD I. BIERMAN/�-0z., DIB/jlm 84-132.o Signed for Mr. Bierman in his absence to avoid delay in mail ing/delivery. DONALD I BIERMAN NEAL R. SONNETT EDWARD R SHOHAT JON A SALE 13ENEDICT P. KUEHNE TEOrILO CHAPA ROBERT M, bUBOrr IRA N. LOEWY JOHN M. KIERNAN LAN Orr -ICES BIERMAN, SONNETT, SHOHAT & SALE PROCESSIONAL ASSrICIATION r1r7H rLCIOP PENINSULA rEOEnAL BUILDING 200 S. E rinST STPE-rT MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 TELEPHONE 13051 358-7477 November 15, 1984 Honorable Maurice A. Ferre Mayor, City of Miami and Honorable City Commission 3500 Pan American Drive Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 Gentlemen: SORT LAUDERDALE OFFICE THE ADVOCATE BUILDING SECOND rLOOP 315 S. E. SEVENTH STPEET COnT LAUDEnDALE, rLOPIDA 33301 (3051 S24 -111n (3051734-2520 (WEST PALM BEACH) REPLY TO: MIAMI I am writing this letter and am requesting that you read it into the record and make it a part of the official hearing with regard to the Commodore Bay Project. I am a native Miamian and have been a frequent visitor to Coconut Grove for many, many years. Coconut Grove is in fact my favorite part of Miami and I have placed a contract for the purchase of a home near Main Highway. I am familiar with the plans for Commodore Bay and have had an opportunity to briefly review them. I wish to speak out wholeheartedly in favor of this project. I believe it is consistent with the City of Miami's plan to develop an urban business section where people live, work and spend their leizure time. I have had the pleasure of visiting Porto Banus in Costa Del Sol., Spain and believe that this project will be very close to the Port project in Porto Banus. That project brings many people into the area who live on the Port and who share the life of the community. I believe that the Commodore Bay Project will have the same positive results for Coconut Grove and for the City of Miami. My wife joins me in this wholehearted endorsement of this Project. Thant, you for your attention and interest in the future lof the City of Miami. Sincerely, DONALD I. BIERMAN DIB/ j lm 84-1320 Signed for Mr. Bierman in his absence to avoid delay in mailing/delivery. M-parimcm ill An mid Art Ilistorc IN ), ISt tx 2 18106 (wal (�ah1c�. PISwhla 112-4 ( 305 ) 28 1-25 12 0 14 November 1984 The Honorable Maurice Ferre Mayor City of Miami P.O. Box 330708 Miami, Fl. 33133 Dear Mr. Ferre: I am writing to you at this time to convey my feelings for the proposed COMMODORE BAY PROJECT put forth by Kenneth Treister. I feel that this pro- ject will develop and enhance and prove to be one of the most eagerly sought after areas to visit, not only by we, the Floridians, but also by visitors who will hear of this project, from all forms of the media. Kenneth Treister, whom we know due to his involvement with and continued development of office buildings and the beautifully detailed MAYFAIR IN THE GROVE, has proved in the past and continued to prove in the present, that forward -looking advances are a necessity for the coming times. The proposed COMMODORE BAY PROJECT, envisioned by Mr. Treister, will consoli- date these very important facts detailed further on in the letter, and which will, upon careful consideration, prove to be a decided asset to the continu- ances of the strength that Coconut Grove and Co.�tiodore Plaza have had and will continue to have upon the city of Aia,ni. Namely: 1. The CO,%U4ODORE BAY PROJECT will create badly needed public access to the waterfront area that surrounds this section and will be available to all. 2. The COM140DORE BAY PROJECT will strengthen the village center by bringing shops and cafes. Parking will be across Commodore Plaza. 3. The COMMODORE BAY PROJECT will cr,.ate moderate -intone apart- ments, a total of 197 apartments, for village center. -next page- 84--1.320 J -G- 4. The COMMODORE BAY PROJECT will create artist center with GROVE HOUSE reactivated and will open pavilions for different art disciplines. 5. The C011*40DORE I'AY PROJECT will provide pavilions encompassing paintinC,s, ceramics, photoE;raph,y, r, t,c . 6. The CO'IN0DORE PAY M10JECT will open an art school run by Juanita May as part of the *,IDs`I'R0F0LITAN %IUSE T4 oi' ART. 7. The MT-10DORE, TAY FR0,7ECT will op<,n OutReach Art Center, part of which will be the black; nc-i.-hborhood . I heartily endorse this proposed project. I fetal that the time has come for Coconut Grove to stretch itself and become the focal point of a very unusual and beautiful arf,a. The COMMODORE•, i,AY PI;OJFCT is well -conceived and covers the needs of the conwiunity. I feel that this project will prove to be an asset and prevent the eventual tare -over by the possibility of a high-rise in our midst. Yours truly, Euglene ,.Mass in Professor Fine Arts Department E,Vh 7 IV, MAA005(1637)(1-00662GA319)PD 11/14/84 IA941110v I t"I II:OZ ICS IPNMLAJ MGY 02801 11-14 0932A Cpi MLAC ()C ; Cmrn�SSl�'v 1CS iF1elMA09 y'lgr3r"_ /05 4-00789ES319 11/14/84 7y /-n4rJ/1Gi.iL ICS IPMMTZZ CSF y0446,61073 T DMT 7AILLAHASSEE FL 44 11-14 1028A EST PMS MAYOR MAURICE A FERRE RPT DLY MGM, DLR 35(jU PAN AiIERICAN Di: ;!r ; MIAMI FL 33133 NE DEFT OF NATURAL RESOURCES STANDS READY TO COOPERATE WITH THE CITY OF MIAMI AND OTHER LOCAL .INTERESTS IN ANY EFFORI TO ACQUIRE THE "COMMODORE BAY" FROPERTY IN COCONUT GROVE FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES. PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CALL ON US AT THE APPROPRIATE T !ME. ELTON J GISSENGANNER DIVN ADM IN 3900 COMMONWEALTH BLVD W.U. Mi-SF (ac•ss) 84-1320 7ALLAHASSEE FL 32303 1984 NOV 14 Al II: 02 84-13�,0 l61 7,YY `\�\\ DAVIo C• rJEALE 3189 VIA A6ITA4E MIAM1, FLORIDA 33133 �1v C3053 447.9700 OLr btJL a tb 575 ham C al - AA 10-1 t� CT ,� 1�aAaL W�atd. In4-0 �-ryvL b ry �2� L64 ogd e � vt w CA, a t7� �t a.o� wiz I u� "o v d �- �� 84-1320 C. NEALE 31GS VIA ASITARE: IIAMI, FLORIDA 33133 E3[353 447-9700 7-ILe ra Imc- Z 6t 4 ivo f 84-1320 CONSULTING ENGINEERS. PLANNERS AND SURVkr1S Hincovine Enginiarringompnny, Inca SINCE 1898 June 28, 1984 Mr. Walter E. Brown Cadastral Section City of Miami Department of Public Works 275 N.W. 2nd Street Miami, Florida 33128 RE: Ownership of Submerged Land COMMODORE BAY Tentative No. 1238 Dear Mr. Brown: We are enclosing a copy of the letter received on June 25th, 1984 from Mr. James W. McFarland, Director of Division of State Lands in response to our inquiry on behalf of Commodore Bay, Inc. As a result of an examination of the records of the Bureau of State Lands Management, it has been determined that the title to the bay bottom land lying landward of the U.S. Harbor Line is vested in the State of Florida, Board of Trustees of the Internal 'I.mprovement Trust Fund. Sincerely yours, BISCAYNE ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. By: Alfr d B. Mohr Executive Vice President Enclosure C.C. - ABM:ej Mr. Charles Triester i az :1 Ez IGT' C o. 529 W. FLAGLER ST. 0 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33130 * DADE: 324.7671 84-IL320 State of Florida DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES f DR. EI'ION I. GItiSI NDANNI.R Executi%t Dirrctor Marjon Slnncman DnWfdds Building 3000 ('nrmm(1nwralth Boulv%ard, laliaha,%ec. Ilonda 32103 June 61 1984 13011 GRAN ',N, Governor GFORGE F-MLSTONE Srtn 1ATN t4 Sitar JIM SMITH Atlornv) General GE:RALD A LEWIS Comptrr,ner BI LL CUN'I'ER Tit 'd Su rer DOYLF (70NNER Corr, miesiunt•t of Art-irulture RALPH D.'I'U)2L1NGTON Commissioner of I.ducation Mr. Alfred B. Mohr, P.E. Biscayne Engineering Company, Inc. 529 hest Flagler Street Miami, Florida 33130 Dear Mr. Mohr: Thank you for your letter of May 30, 1984. The records of the Bureau of State Lands Management have been examined; and, it has been determined that title to the water bottoms of Biscayne Bay located in Section 21, Township 54 South, Range 41 East, indicated on the plat submitted as being landward of the U.S. Harbor Line and lying adjacent to property noted as being o%-.ned by your client, Commodore Bay, Inc., is vested in the State of Florida, Board of Trustees of the Tnternal Improvement Trust Fund. For further assistance, please feel free to contact Bruce Linton -at (904)488-8123. J11M/b1 f Sincerely, 0 James W. MacFarland, Directo Division of State Land S61 �1� G" stl 84-i320 DIVISIONS J ADMINISTRATION REACHES AND SHORES LAN' ENFORCEMENT MARINE RESOURCES RECREATION AND PARKS RESOURCE MANAGEMENT STATE LANDS 4 KENNETH TREISTER nrcltilect I October 19, 1984 '"•� Mr. Donald W. Cather, Director City of Miami Public Works 275 NW "rid St. Miami Fl. 33128 Re: Commodore Bay Dear Don: It has come to my attention that there is a discrepancy between our survey prepared by Biscayne Engineering Co. and the original surveys done by the City of Miami in that there is an overlap of a sliver of land along our common boundary near the bay side. I spoke to George Campbell about this and it seems there is an honest disagreement between the two surveys as to who owns this triangular sliver of land. I would suggest the following as a method of resolving this question. 1. We have an independent surveyor hired at our cost but selected by the Public Works Department, City of Miami, to go over the original records, monuments, etc. and determine who owns that sliver of land. 2. If the sliver of land is found.to belong to the City of Miami and Peacock Park, then our plat will show this and our survey would be corrected. 0j C; 41 2698 S. Ba,yshore Drive Coconut Grove, Florida 333133 858-((2,,416 ,�r � "-a= 3, if it is found that the sliver of land belongs to us, we would then give the city the following two alternates: a. We would grant the City by form of a deed restriction or other permanent covenant suggested by the City Attorney, permanent use of that sliver of land for recreational purposes as part of Peacock Park and we would agree not to use that sliver of land. b. We would give the City of Miami. at no cost to the City a quitclaim deed for that sliver of land provided the City allows us to use that land in our calculations and setbacks for our proposed development. We feel that the above suggestions are the fairest ways to determine first the actual ownership and secondly, they assure the City of continuous use of this property whether it owns the land or not. If this meets with your approval, we would be happy to make this proposal a part of our major use special permit written document which is being prepared by Mr. Luft and would be binding upon us. Stnq/rely, Kfnneth Treister KT:H cc: George Campbell Jack Luft c , 84-1320 • .. r.•. r �c-: ; • !:�rsv.- . �. ..14• ji �,�..\ �..� .. ...ty.•r�a;+`� � �7.. r�,�' r May 31, 1984 Commodore Bay, Inc. y 1399 S. W. 1 Avenue, #400 Miami, FL 33130 Gentlemen: COMMODORE BAY - TENTATIVE PLAT #1238 The City of Miami Plat and Street Committee, at its meeting of May 30, 1984, approved the above tentative plat subject to the following revisions being made to the tentative plat, additional information being provided and/or variances being granted. Please be advised that the processing of your tentative plat cannot proceed until these conditions have been satisfied. -Clarification of encroachment. -Tract designation. -Clarification of ownership of submerged land and/or submit revised tentative. -Notation that structure shown to be demolished. In addition to the above requirements, you should be aware of the following: 1. State and local laws require the installation of various physical improvements in the public rights -of -way when property is platted. These subdivision improvements include paving, drainage, landscaping, sidewalks, etc. In some cases this could represent a substantial investment on your part. 2. The alteration, relocation or installation of utilities such as storm and sanitary sewers, electric, telephone, water, etc., caused by this plat will be at the property owner's expense. Also, utility easements may be required on the property being platted. Page 1 of 2 Commodore Bay, Inc. May 31, 1982 A building permit will not be issued on the property being platted until the final plat is recorded. Also, the Certificate of Occupancy for any building construction will be issued only after all the required subdivision improvements have been completed. U. Approval for fire flow requirements must be obtained from the Fire, Rescue and Inspection Services Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. Additional items must be provided to the City of Miami Department of Public Works before the final plat is submitted to the City Commission for approval. You will be notified in writing as to what these items are after the amount of the bond has been determined for the necessary subdivision. improvements. 6. Tentative plat approval is only valid for one (1) year from the date of the Plat and Street Committee Meeting at which time it was approved. If you have any questions concerning these requirements, please refer to the attached sheet for the appropriate person to contact. Sinc rely, g5e ampbell , Jr . , P J Assistant Design E gineer GVC:rj Enclosure: Contact Sheet cc: Biscayne Engineering Plat and Street Committee Members File Page 2 of 2 °i 84-1320 y} f gn a 17 C ` paim- u r +� 1�' / y y� ,�•� f� �r ! � ", . - -p i yin I,r ,! r am ,, r� 1 !Al1 _ otIP j, yR`C+i4 +�• ,f Fir ti ROAD r. � T Mc �'iL.rqM FAANE ., 10 1 j A. - _—A rrocj qua>. � •i � R� // yl B ' .:•� G� ^� 9 �`��' : V. 'y +4 b 10) M rya is FULLER k + 1 r CIF to Io a ..k 1 ;¢ A; p�,l'LOT MD.6 (D.B= "Do P-255) C N► EMERSON TRAC.' (35-611 4.4 1-4 CO CONU T GROVE BA YFRON 71 A PE P, AT OF A POf i S ` aKF Pc. A' SCNGOL �' � TOWN, . 4A I BOOK 6, PAGE 152, l ),ING /N 5'ECTIOh' 2%, , N.IAMi. DAOE COUN r I 'HE DE r— J i J w ., n re+e�weors n •: • � � fL cocowu r wow 8AmRON r ~A, SEC T/ ON ONc nr rr xx'iT t;r4r 10CArAV SAT rCH � Sra/o t • MPO i NNc;ii Al. .M: ti By 1?+�",�'4- r'fr'EsE;► r5. == Ttie f rAe �• yr A,.c+„ . +,u^ t no' .r•ne'e N c. ,t, . r r''r se7r a' oer _ �nhr _ •. No • . n' 'oi eves!° its, Or ^•ace +'he c• for,- Are . 'e t e<v' '�O. "tL'r N:^! 1 f1� r tRl S" /, rrr a • rd a r' •e :rrr t.rr. an° SM•:F(+rr. r'.4,fff SLrr7 J•ti ONE,' 'he saws jI ,: re fole. ora per r,en of ri4f Prrr•r',•, a :If •r •,r : . NOF.t/AS LAN[ Pl. 4C;OSCY ,.`. , PR,,PEFry es re, e•rdec n O;e, Bo,2 6 Door 'SZ 'O' r'cr n Pin oP rat A 4icord/ or O000 Covrrt, for de erd r , Ac , o''r• o -e, , - r tti 1'4"'1f M,.r. s ,e )„rA i vs! i Ar _ •, yr 1r ... ti a"iwnsA a v'ya �' f✓eat t •e••'I sror Ir r 'str w� ,,,rrl Per',. r-! rrh•.Ir. „ <• ,.ems 'O'e �! ! !,-,.'I Co.�O. � •� n�♦C+e A ` d f r J. Ird comro"O'K •,9 or rM .rrrrs•ec-' .,n ;,i r.r ( ,!. 01 W r'n, VCwrn•e,.' f •we a, r"0 tr'er'o 4,01 .' r st neOI+t r±n< Is c e•t•ere/r JIe% +e Or ,•rrr s1rfA rAeC'tr of ACc,w, 44o♦,vn,e^I .:nt r,c-♦ Mr 4, erre 4'eeo r'011 e• r o;orr' -,,r I e"'t '. 4 •/, _ serf Mrw,r+r^+ . ,+e 0 Jr^e We to n -e `00u o ,! r +� et?A! 'r•r' ape . : r �r/7r, • re .4t .!'• Jr�•, I'�� . '.+ 'Af. J'pG•e^r ,Or i• t'I rtr r , •,) :"r,r ,r r•rI •'v� porn' cr fjee wn no, to o c•o,.,, ;�.,^.o ,,.f ,....r• , rc,nr' ' 7tif ✓Jti'. /! -C"',r ,fc r ♦�_ L 41{F R A, ,'p SCI PRO%'£ '!' of 'rro 'r0 P:, " .c, r' e 'oqr ,.' rstir Pv.i •c .4 C,es of re all, 0, .7 1 F!or,do 'Ar-,'r .rr ,t^v rA0or1'rr:r ,; le •t•r re.lAweI'of q dr..nary- a/ 'Hf ✓ONN A/ LC,P)wIVS (4„c C` a. .Si•Ar."', ql, • O ltta A••rt• .- PPc'F£`*�Y' s'o' � > t•.^c'r �• „S.�d -ter• .. c,n•� •,,r, r %n' ..e r, •h♦ rrr , .WO'JS .ifr •en s.•. 'r'rJf'worl , I'e tAC • •J t<+c , ., rrr ,,. "'r.r+•I• v of C^4 ro c rle M !h rw,. tiro t r .. tn•r .✓so•o "r E Y rrf r (:'� ti $ Ar'% of AC _7 e ?,- q ., .. Jf •t iC rUc^i s'.4JPEF'Y %e• : o•tro r •,f ?i. i/ lrr' •r ♦ re rstrr, r ce. .. ' ,♦ -r •^. .Y •., 'JS:�r; .r, s,.,..etf'rr,d a ose I •tie' r J A /rrr r_ .o..r, o" o'' r' •r r trr, rorry - rid /ors/, r/ w•, . e t�.ve, 'rr r :. +ro,r _ so.a 'Hf -•., 1 ... v � f ._. � ... o'•�, •I' - LAA'£ 47AC•'0 SCt"'CCc '?:"'f!?Tv' /rr o c t.'erce o% ell %eer 'o Mc %trtr p wr,e!r•Jrf'-off w- !A „r ... n 'e, a VS , 4h/ "t '•rora9rr you 'r•r i I.iy _ P4.4:,'d 5CHOO.' F'kI,', r,.rr sr'.. , r me rr, e • ,e;f soulnrsJ. r. N/AA/. o +,.a _, C•h,,,tr ,n . to ' �: the %,—. !A MI,!r' , oo.'rd..• of .T'+t �'J'%r. M!'c?f'4•'AS .,4A•F P[4C'r' .f••d" Ao.: �^ 'o n+e '.- Y 'A♦ rtrrJ:,..t »•., _ Ietr / y , 'Nr SCHOOL p 0PL Rr y ovo ',r n rrrr✓ 1 scuMe♦1/er;� prA.'ar9a!,nn !terror in. • J t'ontr 9'r01i fAC f •ArY �►.-e.o,", stNf '. aoo•n! of . ^!r lr: rmn se •I+ rrr .x5 No'; or L ^r w4,w e" Al'i'" C'/o, sea, vn'v^!or, .7'' o^n rre: ee $,CA .g's: C, 'e Noy C:•,r •:'rrc' :. or l,r °A 4sto-e., rr ZS, If 79 ire e, s+rri-or, thrit,n r•srrrsred o^o rho r rArr red 'hr, S/rrr! j .4 Ve PoP •o^ Pi/e Cevw rr fle;roe ©rl A'hred L'^r AI fft,ee or-proredrd nvn.c rpo• :ore' .• ay e,e „, rn f.r ra'Ao iq _ i /v,'of 4oek� ,'I r! /'iqr 3 .. lkr f'✓d/rc S'eCordf e/' Gbrr Corn!r, f:�-,i+ :OTne1JJ a^o ftiof •+r ro a,,frr;.•.rw• s rAo __ fwerre deft l n� tr fry Jrfr 9i !G" ��' rrn e;r!Ae♦frr�e•4/y a :n' sr'e' US ^�� !o. r.�ro.�-o'-er h'arbOr +r i - ., > s'w•,r♦ of I 's. 7Y Firr to o ao n r C/• ^'rrsrc!-:n A': 'A ,'Ar W' N• iS n+v ,Aen.r •^s a!!„ ♦ tre n Jord norrAres'erl, bevey4ef .•rJt d THE JOHN M gOPK,,vS . AA'f P[ 4C%� S .HODL- 1'ror ;drr urprrse'�. 44 P4'c;/'LRiy end fs so✓ 'Acesfee/r 0,0401 r',jI rerr,e mef e-',n9 tp the r•'•r, t cow„ /�f! li0r -jB i5 run nor!hwntt,rer//,w ♦'end /A♦ nvr'Aerr !rr 'r e.•. fierf• of -re i ri� jLWN r /'�. NOPK'NS ( AA'E PL AG /D SCHOOL pfiOPERT v .rnr , rs p s✓'eees eoI pro/<rr'- rh. s plo' s►at ►cesnrrrr�C♦d !Ar : io%pr nn ; s !Arh Of+on rrrrf for • d,teercr er 9ZI 41 /rr! t, —e ro w! er 4s.-p,In,re'• �f Msem, flor,do rA,s �' No. ,1'____ _.� der orAl *-be fh, s pNt Aos aPpr♦rrd and r.9r tl,t1♦; n4 �,�: c • dr 14'eJe11-.r vA �Vw �'i9df_ ___.Peatrs o.►d ,�r�/. C' f y or Mier,,, f lorsda, rs,it Approved r # t� P •r''.r Jrr) .l PiA-•.a O wrkt C, ly CP S, «r ? ,'`t{, Y � s i -,: C �$ ....,. � sx�r-r.,:: ,a•.c•. t s`' r.. , � ,r'�= /�,,..k , - - �-- . (' t J (\� ( f } 6 ! �' >�,�+ ' . ,-t . ��. �• � -t }�,���j{.�lt�f irk f,t+-1 ' r* -i. >« e,... F1 r+ . • J 3 _ AR,N y zkH �'rJit s?' ..{ t '�=r'Y`xis 4 t � s �i -.r } v j 7r : r . M- � � €t C ¢ u t ;.+a i 3xti,- �e "�+` �R *yam'• I 1 -,r/, � � C 1 X R s a v A 4 'vA� c ` ,r I r.> s4 SuRYEr'nRS,,._,AbT �f �� M �...."�".... t A d-aolvi C M L d�►r• �t e c r J y oI ,ilvAa' Atsr+avnre F L+ 3 3 7 .r z. PA RK SEC TION T,, O,N T ,, r r A ry 5 ,E-('O/ YPEO iN PLAT •h,c. 54 $DUT.N, Rkay;E" 4i BAST =— FL c ,PICA 0OF• R;OA ,Y 967 ONE .�, � V • t� t a/,.,• w '� a r, rr ^o oho r �. -/r 4rrtl. erer're'td /O •AT ,^t r•4''.Tr/�� �O CliiVftd •.f .'A - - der JA l t. ... �•e-r�r, J• f -e edat—ra's PQ�a ,rear: • :.'�, or , i aa.( •rtt or rht '(M J trumt/tf oM the •kr .'sIs ird nW�sta r4e f(.W e. /he S/:I ♦ 'I •�! der OA/ lr .� r,/trrf 1 i ,r 1rp Oral i sn,n7 Board f c. —'_— Dr Ou/hor,tr of �A 1• _.�_� tIf/I /� -� If II•.✓ S - _sa',i ^ nJr u�cCeiao Ini /P/rfrt� cy the, G, ty Cn rrnrrss o.r of %ht fi E�SrI''rn+brr^_ D 1967. r5`!;4 Sc _ ntc_ • � r*rR f`o• ae �ienn.f+� D/oorfr»f�t fiA�1 A D, eat d a �, fr r•t�I %n.,n9 CAM eo, ldMy 19G 1( 7 J K� w e 1 �r�r�+'to end hf li+rr�( :fr.! r. ♦,per l `♦ J r was :oe/: ors / ��j-ar.•rr s.e .7o+c fe A� 1�f 8oar0 a Of .,�: Ca.r n„1t�Cnrrt r/ Bd�r C'. v�lr 4*-r�r : • c 96' � _ ^.w� wI �A✓ ram• ��,j ,S•tntJ _ ao rra� - �ls�� T. Vlrr �o r/n✓n. H oI j NfF'fB' ' fRr'!Y tA(t fhr s''of "ee' pl✓' 'r ,OCD/+l;T GROIIlE 8r8YFti'C%NT r} PART Jf_ ' C4. OA`t •.1 ♦ •'rr! N✓ . r,rtt'rrJ,r rr//r ,'.r •• ♦' - . lallta n!t/ �+Y I'rK/ /nit• I orrO'SO Cf tP7 fV +hcr /ht PPr? Orr zl" f�iQfs g d p re/ en rh( t a /•j ♦r Mrw: e»r•1'f •r/r _L f c �- w5e 7 ti Jr/t( oe f/�rrle % !f • /•a, rrc a rd =AN li_ stor terp r �eo_�� e/ Plf/t, a' Pt,.!'~ /hr PvPit o b,,c erds m�Gae/t CtFF�ft', A , i x /••%Ie. rh,: Y/e/ to�o'l�eJ frith the Pro to I!O'+1 of 1hf fowl t;r^tcPr of /Orl4JC p/r0 /NrlrePm/,!O,� Ped[ 40[Uttr� L(DIld/. - .• Frr: �*� / C/erk of GfnG b^r t Cmarrt ' ; 1 y 1 y F t., :a d 4., iyy %J - Q c� - ti a t� Er a! � I m 4k Fa Cl 41 f Q.R. `tv a'' o 41 LA 6 f �NV T GPO VE Q L L, V Lam' i �JI � �M �'AWN\ FRI -- -------- I", A.C. C�l cfy I 3 4 er C rw ;e7 -7 I=> L.1 C7 oe 4LXS f7• C3 ri v 2197, A e.)- 1303 r,) r7 0"ke ry7 and I 77 .� ,, ,,.. ... �`, ' ��iC71 � � -r ,-� `� ,1 � ,-�r� _ �"' "+.� -�i1 •,'•-� �e c t, .`"ic ^ o`er ._ � f'I.y � .n f• r=, ti . I ,e.t,M•.C;L0, I f, � `, �o - p� a� r � � a � �• -� ^ c' rh � cw7 v V E' r- �.� ^ <� � i .� o �•l-+B o rho �.� � � •. .-` �.-. .A � .� G;�-+e'er-c±.�, �,r� Iti' f yo -+'7E �•'✓P_�� ^ a- �- .a�aJ /� r`f �.� �t• --r. r,L'.0 �. �,,Y,IP<.FQ ., _ I�%C E'kf-'i/-UY�O �-. .� C �,, ♦rr-• •"f r'7 C, t71 ✓c�IL/,'J r'cJ r'`' tOC �" O^. C" ev jr- SC,•o ,rC� _ E,.3 Ki--'e-E. :/cx� .� ���• a •. a..• ,o rc�`Op�U�e' c»v� c'1pv^! F-.�orr') !'7er' so cY c ,, •- •. nog^i. s r•�� ''�.� 6 �� II l P 1 Li Clt C, ' hau+ onv con'3�rarr7T,com u Slor! Gro n �e� S�� OI !7LjIle -cy ory o _ �o by <?-CY--"-2ncc �lo .1 o�c/�55eci onci rr•!-r ..,! �r''P G.�ti• or^ -i � Ay�.G7T ..7 1 �Jo �rG. �" r., a. ,�i • •��'- ,<.,_!.ro by �,<. - - _ 'hp' ,'nP Y�!tc:c^^o ,o,c,. �P t�.J�/�Ono Co► C4� raT'7e `tea r•�C ._ „ -AP O'�o Cam. �.�on thn1 !' K� ;i�%S OrP_ C'C� �UA'��►� ♦�' O ^Arf>ee O 37', JfO YQ O.G r'lOrrdC r' cC � �IIII� I. I I � I I I � i II �� � I � I II I I i III I Ili IIII'IIII I II I'I IIIII'IIIIIIIIII'IlIIIIIII ��'��� �'� a =� �, 4 al A F fA Y � \ 36.483' Naof th �s plo f 6e.' S 30- , 0- 0M. HOP!(lh/S LAKE PL ACIG .: CNC� rJ� (6- /5c) s� 7' A Pprt Of Thy s din r ri22• .:. J' �` �.�'j .; $. ►,i �«-Z.5 J 1 n t C00C n a b c. A a� O r - Cl tO J I I 1 1 r''l'-li I I t y 45ROAO 1I ow 3 T . r 1-2c; ' (ZIelll 7�, eole r- a4. /0 Y 7 .tic- 5.i/4 r. 9, s 40/77♦ RI.1. • f TRACT "A'' Me 'fr `^-tip 9.4Ct4cre5 �L • • } ,� / tart Ciiq/ Pock B/d . .W 1-41 �1lfil� *r Poh+"' ' ., _, ..; <�"::-�j�d��t�oi�IBko��lii'IIIB�flil I �n I I I � II r u i 1 i 1 � � • � — LL o � 14,1 � Y `�' � o, 364.83 1 Nv t o Part of th/s a o�� 48789' M 1-16PKIA1 L AKE Pt AC/G 1 Walltc - a f� C 1 �a f t } r ZL ti ��.• e^ !T InC cry• -. t. � ]f''flr,� 1 — �97.3 -E NO o p , ; 5 i 79r � N 441 45 I !9.4 L E r7 r. z It rroct 'A" SON Tn A-i_. n. COCONUT CWtWll; ,f F LAI OF A ;P*! !(',N 4 . " 1, THE MKINS I.AK.F. PLP. :11) ';('Il( 1) 1. t t LAJ TW' C X-1 ION bAT)F It F'; Ad. ,& owv. p 6 R i x'; t" C*-.j 'a P6 in L. Li W. t F p , r, PI.AC I D SCHUIOL RO " o r n 1 along a line 1!A t- 31 -4 1 ECO t PLACID SCHOOL PROP11. for M. HOPKINS LAKE Pl..'1, ID bortdary o'- sa 979.06 f ee 4fl: w, IMqu 40 PAP-11 Pf i'll: OF er, T., ------------- 3 J; wt rx F ire. W-1 c n7 r4 318.9 4' 7y le -c "CIC 0 C.) Fi- 0 i i li rJ -lot Aw- Guy Mee /O'Hyb Rork Sfcp 2' at- Ofi, rt 71 A3t N N 2. ks" it ip 13 3 (D S. T Nt 75' 23 iPM A, Cl M Alf�l -32) li -. 1 '7 SW j LA A .9 Z�t,5 14 ROAP (A tj "TH6 'VOMAI 14. yoe�ajv,,�. Ll SCHOOL I— PIE A CIO Y 4 hi 'iffM 7 60, N."o" P-25 YWONR0,c ET AL PlAr if S WE 7"C Pl z AM r 1ai s ME 4a i. F W ✓ "F 1 Er 0 / E .. n v Clrvr 1� y l• i i - i' 10N ONE z s F • �' `,? . _ . ..fir-1/c.. . v 97 t:� 1-N,'s'Itg. � afi j" 'tt i�iL•,'�! 1pir ��r.�-• t +x+ �r 1%,e!ttE'_'1 .'i irliie{C : 1:/ Jib? e �.�', 'q . N I.Alk l'.Ilc'. t%4t1jrim "I'(:1�fM3' •�1�' -a E11]v 1)oIrod v ►'HS JOHN i,+,0P%.LDS [.AKE Vilyd l i.a "liL .�a►a!`� ri . :,�,11KT `• l.AY, `1 di;.iiL t r' KS - . p 1'•' '� S t. , 7„ •; i � � .. � Irb.t� .. _1 j , y�, , ,,r.,�.ry,;K ,�;,�,Y ri-'� .s.' �, . • '- �.., /� 1 1 . • r i` 'g w . q.-,= �=+sN. ]maw'•- 1 ii t tunes. g .� recor d on i.Y scribed other than r: s}�C�4rT ���:: c'i:?? :.!gala i.y,,•.`. �.{'�t:lt t� pl.at i'las been q, :. true and c -wrecr, . ' • jjj IN I JOB NO-E PR FILE NO. ,%` ���..t: .Ja ,i �+ c � r ss �,, � .' �K^� i •r ;ti .r a { .� � y,i r�i.a� $•_�s r c5 ;.,_.a i r '� � .4 � ,� �' � a, y , T S yT� 1 r r ,.r .�. 1 r1 %� ? ..!Q 1� �,y�` 4� �• i r � tym i�(� r -ia. r ..%4((^P: - : _�...: � �- t. •'�r� <. ( ye (�+� lx s in � •. a r 34L i :;r -3'i.c �r i; r e• �'„ _ A' :, ,f• " } rtJai sr✓ 77 s• r c+r _ems+ (" +. _ +p.z- r �Ir�, t J •+ a „•y �t w � + r f � ..,�'�-.7 ,�+r. ��` .�` -;��` .� � k 1 - t _ . �.tt4•'i eT' -� r f � is t �� �� tr..: Ttt �'.�.• T �( ..-3= _ Y ,(. � ZKq: tc-+.�-r� Y_"s.'Y � �' y � ' .� 7' s a f ' + _ is ; f ja.• � ; _. rC a { >� "+'rT[ , ..3; �. , t . � : ~�� �. rx'yt. �� ��ti } fra rr, s + � r r � �xas� rs• .;rr`f' w.� �d y�+�^ i rye k1. �: �- '�,•� '.}....-� a"t-. t:.rl �" � '� �.T r r' `.r` r � � �� -r � �.r-i'*t..•i't�t'�4` L�' i-'4�>�•r yr�..s �F •,Fj �'�'�., Yr- hr t yt �� E'a-'-ram z t ,sK 3�.!•n �r : {i -s-• u ;'.' �` � '-` t i �" % ,•'z= F..'+ � '� 4'�' a,„%Fdy.� 1, _ � r r � ..e.•ti eYji .?'�yyFtEi f n"3�_►. y?�.'T��'�e `? .�i 1`.' - Sr > r •'a j? �Y il�.'.SY�ai -:� ;`.- � +�' � �•'� '+'` '. a.t it �,, "�q`w-.i. n. ` C r`> jr , K t 'pit r� • s- r t s r-•'SY Jp 'T t'''' l �J, .r+ �� f..5 s'{ r J+ -�i . � � �r J �' r� ., i- .7 �ti., �rf k'� f � +,�,• s� a :�,, n �!"- � r /-ii"Y� -'T �•..1 �} � 5 ' .� � � .,r•,r. 'Sc •'�•t ..,.� _a�. , � +�' '"; �..•y. y�?Wt+. jr '*` f 4 '• ak . �. c. §ya.�•' aE fi ��cs:f"�ai.�.e?�.:' '...f'�'••. �`��~�t!Ct 1�r4-�' fir.... '�C..:u(?'��"L:���• --.w''.:4 .`i'��e�. f= , — _ '♦t 1 _ - . • ,. a '- 'i Plo_, _ .. � I- sty M% - :l ? t �� e 3 r 1� I iZ �. • , ��ytt� F!" Ir t<.i e x i :;1. t X"r J- :AM��' O I r"" t '' i S 3`f rl t r -y-6 T fi i "'t1, '` .1 s� _ it „r '�3a `Ty. ,, ' x _ 3 > Ez 4 g"'. t . i')th t' _I'�Fc _ 4 .� - k i r `� .p.. i 3 < 3, .z� ,`' tij`r" s=r`'`o S t 5 l _n"t�i`-", ar he j r F• . -„ :y rr , T $ J� ` C ,, ,qt. "` I".'t _.�.rv•.:!' _,.,t/^' -.�.• .,raS i .,'*'• s r ,< r^:t. - r ,K f P 1 .'r+ y ,'.,..s.a^^-' _ n t t > rhL. a , 57 Y r , i 4 ! r F z ..•-r". . -t n r 4 ! , X" # ' t.-', ! ,3. . r a��2 T{� .1 „c e �eWt a*1'z. T! .a. p. A ..zc4 3 y, .. 'vcl N ''�M �- 'F 'T" •.•" Yi "( 4 ..-.rfi t-3'.'Mz.' S �`. . ', '�"'-F'.. �K. ''!PILL x n a. Ltai.'" K,g"ti 1".j'.r r" `I!� �.' c:',,.'T-. 'L, L�'•a"...-r-i.'sr.--_,,,,�,7� •* 1:' `�?- c ` tL;,�^Y9•'&t . •^+e'er e S', ,,.,{.�- .� ..'F .'r� cc•r':..1 a,�y, �...�.� .r_. y^T,:T,k•• 'A;.."l. "�'�'• !.'Tr z`,r .t>ly't i.t'.cc ..."*a k t::. M ., " r } . P Y'.. _ 'ir 1 T' n - y L _. f ! r d .R ._ S i ..z i .,'+rs• 'P* \. t _ ra ,» _ i t 4 , ' r _ ..:a E - Yv, -,., ' ':.'• _ 4 t .- 0 1 - 'l ">.!t t.4 1; rF .,, t .a• '.• j i'r I • 1 i• z z 1 _. i ♦ A. , -t - 'v .. I .�. �....r•.\•yti T } Ir •t L r=\Iw}j",r� "`j.'i is% '�+, "r5 .,y . `^T.r. . _,k--.�:,,i F <.x. i.t': -.. it t yam} PR,4,\. t ' 1 7 i � }..rt i -i � I 1 -�F .7 r_4- e,t : f' -�"� mow- - N. ( 3p, `$ 3 ,�ra,yt, 'a'? �s A, .. iT'""_'CC+5�4�+ i Y" ,qy e r .+. - t t..>., `�,'5'! 4 + ;.r `C. : •:'G E'( s r �,, '9'"'. "-"i5 T- ?, a n ; +�',L'`- t , f ,:! 1~:l t`'l..fi ,� �� �.! mil` •* � T. ��^� °� iNkr� fi "� r - lcµ,'+ f,.` k 'x L. @ t�t� a _ u .r•t` 1 - �' -,ci€: .e. �' , Y,... "'►-,s� = ,;d -.'`s..� ' . itr .,r'�z..,j "r,, r: - '§' h'' `E - l j I" -c Sfn y 4 P r i r tr r i r!: �$ i? s� a 7 ! -L \kk _ . '\ i 1 y.: raj. �. w �ry� •i sry f ". -� X, '.tJ.. � a X/t. «• �'�4..iWI E*,�.. +A. y;A.17L�T f. ',Py. lt-+' f,.t 'fi ,,r -'.': 4 h r y;,rl. Y i-✓.. . 3,3 , �'r< .tr'•+ -i'ft l a.'`i";` t = o;ti•iy5'S #; T �,tit�, p� s _ 777111"'SSf.7kl �. 6 •� f`" .� .r. 'a I •.- , - ts'a' .u. 1 y . �',}� ., : �.•s } I t sY' ( t sly r `Aid-7 y t a L S Y /} ''� 1. r kz ,F" . �, a1t i , ,,. $ r -i rp t f rt F►, . E _ ,bs f' ,F.,f-•'" C 7�: as # i ll,t. r i ��,, :F :4 f•'r.$• � , �� � `: i � L. ,-� ".-Y .1..s. �Krt �.\ is u • � i " • r - `- `✓ 4 A- - k � r- '� t ki' fir.•: s -� .f iy k ,r , 1 L ... a, y >., _ _ :_ r 't -' t .'a "- _X, T4 Yr,�, r to J_i �j 42" .�iti'�TS �ii i�`yfu '�.'. i ASa ,r - r -r --• j p , R i .ram' .� P. _ S? I. 4 r_ �s, --F Lr St - Y `\` ;', t --j, 'S,c � j1{tal I Y ' 1F 4,u r l'•i'-�+ '4' � fl", ;t+:3 }' i a ti d �`4r rrr-s tic" 7rt t:.:dt �s ✓'`�E.�.ta 9;.��'ir r 3.^\tc' "c n"'t3X..K �. �r> \ d Lit - € , ,� 4yt• ty r ��l& aZrr�'. } ykA P r •.{ -{ F t .� �t II r r r�.y'x- >d i•e r t � J �r r td 7 + + i t K ,r`r �r { Y _-r,vmti�tVgyt,j Lp' �F _ f. if V .� +. r _ is eti, _ "5 t �"1� sJ td.r y,.% 1 ��.:�i.•.�-, i '- ""d -,�.-: Y' i 1 _� : y N E �� >. . 1. I" �°' ✓ r' .r :,Z7t �..:" i.-i i ja r •rt ..r':;" c. .+� k L 't .d� k 13- ,t.J e iwi a r RS'i J�S.7 �+ .7A i` fr .� �t 'i a raft a ' `r i ::r Trt t`f�r slrclvrir' 1'7 �i t - s'r 8 A".$ r s z l it F j t• f ,.,�T}sf y .. .- �` N'sa tt 4yt .7, - a ff _f i z t f -L y d .t { '. 'ri� >� ( R e t*,. ti r_d f u".tx r- .YYU 1 t Y. i r. � ^i>+ k k rr i t r'h rr q- � '`. r, 3�� , : P - � �, t '1^ .,y'+t'�`..Sti .,.,f le .I ��. !/ I, 4 Fa ° ■•x��.. [ ... +4 �17-i- .a• s'csF. .tT i r 1� t., L ;Ttitt fsw.y r i°t .1r r Y (x �. �r.� r r t•t._ dbr-+..fib .. d 5- u Y.:- v.'' ' t 't_ :.► t x .-.7 k `s r •z.. -. 3 _ z-ir.J .. -'F-.j 1r F i w 'i.L aaw fe `' s`s. Y -' �i ] rrt. r yts �.. - r ...r., [ r, w ,f y �:*. !' r-.r�°� .. J' 't�+ - . L�r ' 3• tad" i. _y� �r i-i •-, tu' $.rR p•i ram . �h �totrt-',S,y .r-:r '4 +,'`j%t , v a! ,�� ,tt „fit- � j.' ♦ "'t,'.+t .,�\ fir• . v - .P• ;` Y,,,P ._ r p ..• Sr _ .! 3 . t _ �. ! .y'; }a.! .7'i Yt -. rtS 1 Y i i. ♦ ,} +t , ~ i - r i ., ;:J,k-, , 2 `.� ar,. -- In ° y ,+ S Ny t � X i P; A s_`r:k c ! , �, - , _ Z^�. ,q a . r`a�T ,IL- �p - K r_ -,! - .zj6K�ir� <.Ili '.ti - - �� 1 1 - j\ - y .� a: - sy a.l� t 1 u �: .:t fi r ".:,. s �-r �6 t" a� .� ' ri _ r _ � - 7 X - - z* 'yi,,)., t'p - , A,.v � •+'F•t X 2 � wr y .. - .•1 R t t > �, r ,y'tr-a cr iiiP l� 1 ,t. i,,. t :ya, p ors - rR. _ X y -' 1 .4 ";I:.-. i{. Pi, :iL :t J - z �+ 'rIR a \ i;4r s u� '� `^ t:."ai+ x r, s 'c" , a;-•L.y ryyr" r y�+r*'l- �� t Nti t > 7 t T' %Yp•r! ••,�.r i Y" " .. .ps .a't' ui::.�P :c.J Yi}>f T '.: th - \J_ t t - `' S ,ty',.. �. . ¢� 4 ..+•� i. ♦1 ,af :,� » ter 'T' y� .t pr"y'S'. t ''^ �',� _ 4el %w'i"" ..c, y3 t ♦ .,; ! s �`1+-a- 4.-, _ ;1. S Xt�- ak��., T•X'F' !S. 'Y w t� rna s - rt _�- �l . ^i a'G- C JT�S _-.qy}rw•-•-�tr \ �NTra�'C+tr..+� J'• -u •_. ,+J t: . �ws t i ^t `i r 't`!i'tti'.i i � ..Y .r, '.-s ,y -x S t fi • �>+t s +r' �" z N. ,.�... ai0. ,I '�'' ' �i'r' S - `,'i 'Tr`? ), r+., t' .T"v s! 3 �°1�'.e �i .,. .�u.1((CC ,'; y •-'. J- r i tf' S '�4..•t"t isF'',n y:''PT- j`+•e.ze� �'E-� r /.SS't� - .,../c . l iAf b ' -, r, t z A, \ I. L r �i 'S '.rt. iC . .... e .��t.i•+ �i. I 1 r ""'t°{ ryryr L.. � r'-`t :t.. ....l:n ..e ! - '.:•r, r fi 4 � � , ' sys'j t � tr t �c ek+ rr�, `'-•+ +t�...i .So,',,s_ z"� s V ({�I ... �� �� TC�f ti Ax�i*+Tr.F rm i j = lr> �j �'thh% :.a�. K at ' c e �` L rwy�' k�,: •�- 7 t•'. PLi fir._ i } •t •, �,t .i_ E s" T p '� _ 'i' C �'• r. ?A r •.411, .� µf pr�i F t L..,a� L'"k° ' L "�+' •L e > T�"_T"C'11 r w .rt �� r f r i id. 4 'Y, -cY, }tr-b y�. i 1. _ :- .R. .I s; .��,� rk' 77 Ir a rr rl tt: °y }rat d',,•+tf'dl=E A:.`r 7�:�! r r.. s �y 'I'll hPtP �` +i'it z 1. .i_...'r'�l~"a+ ff :.` ..i";fit t ih -4 . •! w 7 _^�a L ..x !p•,.1.! T t��, .*."'�.a,'x '�-z` ... , t• . _ -r ,L y r ��rryy r c `C t.1.--.• t r. M•'- : .i fi (- i t I 4 - t 1 ¢ ! C h t @� MS.. 1 3'F` r r z 4` - u t . •'. t ` • ��."t (y .\ _..dam u �•Tl+! r v : �sV (+ .+ 4 ..... tip... - --J L i •- '�` Y + ,r ri� i ' r t 4 y 4 ! :s�.... c. r , t , i `^ ` r r < t _ h ,r �' �' " k •ter ',,,-� l t` '. f �' '4 . -t ._ r .A y .d s # f i t ; � ir! Y (> . . rr .� I -+a ..y'. .'.''°' 4 fr'a t T' 4. dcL I" } E f, .-L �`�c.. c•' � t ^ k'-M ,�.• : .. �d"'3..0 rrS '_.. r'+ S, y .s- a �. T .r 3 _ -rr 4�s :;•t ... ! r.-- - I 1 . L� ..s.a - ti+ ! Y- ..L P. ik, l iti4F ! tt M• t' t 1�: ;o�.,; � . .— I- Y- , ,' , , _ - . . , , . I �.�.,� t . " : . I . _ 1 .1 .. I . . . M — ' � . . � � ,. y . . _ , r ;. .. -vow _'s D i3 ' j , r ts-�a { _ - -_ , _ C `("'cv,�y".r„r% r � ca_ ! - _, " .,• ry = ., .r y..iw pi n.+ rrl ,•� 1 , . * X y". *tl d `Ra >+ `'""`[u f..({."jy '"' , )Tfisr'"' , "= i :. '2 [i,., p' aa• ��dQa� ,ej : }.' 0 .)ylr ,� i .".,,< .�.y*„'i _ y 7^j -ti T J 'y�-ir/ 3f 1i71 l� si Y +'x! ` tMIT `f -r rzn. It, - r# ,.��r �} -'�. X: p ,L. iN'.e.;kMr r z- r A ..r. t � ,tS, `; a> y t _ L. I tea` Ya y Sy ,FfYf "�" lay.-i .✓"H i� SF S•1 t 1 \'��r F,' `( �' st: sY' T • '-�T �z 3',' ..'r3 � _;� 4 i it L 1 ej '� S.w s, fa r.tq, �r \ 'r 4 .Fw_ 's iy � `t -a^' s ,Ts f 'ram.+ t. .,.>� � ' h _ a „ �`` x., n- 4`'1�r a d' i SYBt t �J r tr. t tkrK X 41 . t t • A t .., ''-i,; r r•l was ,' t 'yr- rt i'� z -Z, _ h �. - ri •a', >'.. ... j,� Y :a y - s _y- i; 'Ic w: .'� .--+,.i�cr '. @_t Y .+^R-'..� s e�'t c u r .0 "•ai i![ Y t- �_.• -_ >,y :. Y. , ;. r. , Y I ..XF P t 1 i - S.d h f z � �,.w_ ( . 1 A a.� - �' ,_? x -t R-` 3- k >4 z. Etr -.+ k 1 .r� ;�i 6t- tom`^ C• Flo t...S�L'i - ! 4 c'i -i`1._' ".t Jb'L .ri") �). yfr,x c T'• .r'L4 i 14 ro ti, ' s r r. A'.j` 'E '..',Cf.'@tr. a R _ ♦ rtr.,_ pj -;. r _r r... r rt t y. �! a Z , : z t - c z1• _ .r, CX?' : >> 'w��: .. . r '.. �"kY'a. ".-, i "t i -'. -t x. t ..-lln z.ia� li. i7 .. -4 . m . . TYPE D1AM TREE 1.2--- TREE 0.6 TREE 3.7 1c/a't Tv S C cr Z.- TREE 0.6 TREE 0.8 /vo�"lfierlf Ba/y TNF C,IN. E'MEk'SGN TltACT(35-�/� TREE 1.5 ti OAK TREE 2.0 4 1.5 119706PINE t fir, � `e jo2�/•BG . "- --------- �¢�.11a' � TREE REE 0.8 ��Q./� ` ` �'1�' t OAK TREE 1.6 a o Gi$ TREE 0.8 �C, ` �0 ^+1 In 'Mj TREE 2.0 x _ ch��,�f OAK TREE �.7 ( 31 , % TREF _ 0.6 ((( TREE 0.7C,� ` pia ti O C� AK TREE 11 .2 PALM TREE 1.0 1 ` �'�Y.c?o PINE TREE 1.0 TREE 0.7 TREE 1.0 OAK TREE 1.3 OAK TREE 1.0 TREE 0.9 TREE 0.8 .; OAK TREE 0.8 I OAK TREE 0.6 j OAK TREE 0.7 v TREE 0.6 Y OAK TREE 0.9 TREE 0.6 Xqe ,C- kA FMER5ON TRAC T (35 -4&0 . lrr, Qr �11 846./O" 5o��th L/:�e CQCONC/T CROvE �A �RO�'T �.4/?K�'d2-85� Ito m I 0,q llt P 0 S 1 8 L E F 40RAFT GUILDS AND SHOPS 114 op ENTRANCE AN WOODEN PAVILLIONS FROM MoF ABLAIN VIZ 17 OUT VVIA 0 N EROAD UP, ... . . ..... .. ......... ... ........ • X.: .... ......• . ... • ............ . ................ .. ................ .................... . . . .... ........... ........ ......... • ...... ....... .... ----- ..... ... X • • • ...... ..... ....... ......• ........... ...... • .......... .... ..... .. ........... ............... . ............ ..... ........ .... r-y? .. ........ ( all' f , 41/ 0 x4a T4 K ARE .... ..... ......... .......... rs A U P 0 O-W�[T u IN D a A a It *-U w a'. p A a KAIOU- w v ,O,pv - -1 - 4317 39,3, lam AP AIR T M E HT 0 LOW rf F—�--2 ALA, NEW TRH -YNA EV All,: 70 -ET-- MAHkWNY 7T�W2 0. ws AONATEv 13Y NJt-l?-0< C• S� r,,0�NO Tf�� IN izy-AnoN ire H3moo,- 0- T U R E 1(97 w &r .......... ... .. ....... EXIT ............. D RO AD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . •...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . .. ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . is 44- . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4- a �� tl.�: At, , .• ' I A � PEACOCK PARK �I zw -- - - • - - ♦ • • • 3�d '� • � �- • 19 14 •>:•:. ........ ;:::::::............... ............. :....... ....... ............. ;:::;:'............... I .. . ........ i APARTMENTS.... '....::.:.:.:.:. :,::. !. F i::. ,S i .: :-:>' i - i T '`::. :: 1. .;.:': fi 4. - Y ••y ' �✓ {�- • C (^ �., i A i ,4Tt.� - - - f '� ) 1 PIE N _�. �,� •j•, -�� - . - _ _ _ -- t t WeilL -r • A .. : -- :: .. +C•�.:: .. .... .1...... .i._ . . ._ .., __.-..,_ .-_w . ..... Z. 1. �.. (- .�____ ........... - -. :x t :=: •.'Y�-.• .•.•'•. • S. • I' i• r qt.• 41r7 • ►T1L s 46 �r .� 11 �; a A•�t:ft'_�► C L. E H E S T �O R i C fi f T E _z = ::.:•::.:.. • . '�5i�0 use . �:: :: ® • ►V7 ► _ 41 • r ..#`'.Ic 0 M 0 D'O HE B AlY 1 s .-TR i T E R & C A N T I L ` r . 2 '6 g g S O U T H B A Y S H O R E D R I V E C 0 C O N U S C. A L E .1 ' :.3 O ' .. 0 DATE: JUNE 1.1 1984 a, COASTLINE s 00 WATeKV"'r AVM BI&C A YKA W#T I = TYPE DIAM TREE 1.2 TREE 0.6SC�IC:• TREE o•7 TREE o.6. , a TREE 0.8 1 Ivlorfher/f Bdy TsiF C•w, EMEQ50/V TR,aCT(35-��i 1:2 T RE•E.. � • TREE 1.5 //37 �6 'OAK TREE 2.0 PINE TREE 1.5 E 0.8 a o 13r3P • �- �S1 I)HK TREE 7enf TREE 0.8 TREE 2.0 38 3J ,'� _ 't4 OAF: TREE 0.7 TREf 0.6 TREE 0.7 � C�COiVlij-SRO v� $ OAK TREE 0.7f• OAK TREE 1.2 y PALM TREE 1.0 �1 PINE TREE 1.0 TREE 0.7 TREE 1.0 DAK TREE 1.3 OAK TREE 1.0 TREE 0.9 0.8 TREE '-9 OAK TREE 0.8 OAK TREE 0.6 OAK TREE 0.7 _. TREE 0.6 1 OAK TREE TREE 0.6* `vC EAIERSDNTRACT/(3$'6/�. —/✓or��,er�f 80Unc1c��-i TNq .UE� N v T PLAT 1 Comic. ✓tad � Wl N4G�25. 53••�/ (p eed� - t��I 846. CO Vtlr c pro vE -6A FRONT P,aRK(82-g5) n7 Cn f- __-____—. - 5 e c G7ETi4 ..•. I I I 1' I I ! I I' I il�