HomeMy WebLinkAboutM-84-1349G
Howard V. Gary :ATE. September 13. 1984
City Manager
RESOLUTION - RECOMMEND DENIAL
4to
o E. ez-L o
r
Planning and Zoning Boards
Administration Department
COMMODORE BAY PROJECT
3471 MAIN HIGHWAY
_5 COMMISSION AGENDA - SEPTEMBER 20,
PLANNING AND ZONING ITEMS
It is recommended by the Planning Advisory
Board that the request to file the final
application for Major Use Special Permit
for the Commodore B!r Project located at
approximately 3471 main Highway be denied.
The Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of September 12, 1984. Item 1,
following an advertised hearing, made a motion recommending approval of the
final application for Major Use Special Permit for the Commodore Bay Project
located at approximately 3471 Main Highway, complete legal description on
file with the Planning and Zoning Boards Administration, which necessitates:
a change in sector nimber from RS-1/1 One Family Detached Residential to the
proposed RS-1/4 One Family Detached Residential and a change in zoning
classification from the proposed RS-1/4 One Family Detached Residential to
the proposed PD-MU/4 Planned Development -Mixed Use; and further, making
findings and granting a deviation from the Waterfront Charter Amendment,
Section 3(4) of the Charter of the City of Miami; amending the'Miami
Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan; ratifying the recommendation of the
Heritage Conservation Board to permit development within Environmental
Preservation District 46-5 and to grant a tree removal permit; issuing a
Major Use Special Permit for the Commodore Bay Project, and providing that
the permit shall be binding on the applicarrt and successors in interest,
which failed by a 3 to 3 vote, therefore constituting a recommendation of
denial; five votes are required for a recommendation.
Two objections received in the mail; seventy-five opponents present at the
meeting; sixty-one proponents present at the meeting.
Backup information is include for your review.
A RESOLUTION to provide for the above has been prepared by the City
Attorney's Office and submitted for consideration of the City Commission.
AEPL:III
cc: Law Department
NOTE: Planning Department recommends: APPROVAL with conditions
UNA349
- r
PLANNING FACT SHEET
APPLICANT Kenneth Treister:
June 15, 1984
PETITION 1. Commodore Bay (Approx. 3471 Main Highway)
Legal Description and documents on file with
the Planning and Zoning Boards
.Administration Department.
Consideration of, and recommendations on, the
Final Application for Major Use Special Permit
for the Commodore Bay Project, including a
deviation from the Waterfront Charter Amendment
Section 3(4) of the Charter of the City of
Miami; permission for tree removal and
development within Environmental Preservation
Oistr;ct 46-5, and a change in sector number
from RS-1/1 ONE FAI4ILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL to
RS-1/4 ONE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL; change
in zoning classification from the proposed RS-
1/4 ONE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL to PO-MU/4
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - MIXED USE; all per Article
28 MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS: DETAILED
REQUIREMENTS; Sections 2802.3-7 and 2803 of
Zoning Ordinance 9500.
REQUEST To recommend the Final Application for Major Use
Special Permit for the Commodore Bay project.
BACKGROUND Under the Major Use Special Permit process the
Commodore Bay project preliminary plan has been
reviewed by the PAB on June 20, 1984, and by the
City Commission on June 28, 1984. The final
plan review was rescheduled by the PAB from
July 13, 1984 to September 5, 1984. It is the
general intent of the Major Use Special Permit
to include, in one action, zoning district
classifications, other zoning actions, and other
City ordinances that would be necessary for a
building permit application to be considered.
PA8 9/12/84
ITEM #I
PAGE 1
PLANNING FACT SHEET
APPLICANT Kenneth Treister:
June 15, 1984
PETITION 1. Commodore Bay (Approx. 3471 Main Highway)
Legal Description and documents on file with
the Planning and Zoning Boards
.Administration Department.
Consideration of, and recommendations on, the
Final Application for Major Use Special Permit
for the Commodore Bay Project, including a
deviation from the Waterfront Charter Amendment
Section 3(4) of the Charter of the City of
Miami; permission for tree removal and
development within Environmental Preservation
Oistr;ct 46-5, and a change in sector number
from RS-1/1 ONE FAI4ILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL to
RS-1/4 ONE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL; change
in zoning classification from the proposed RS-
1/4 ONE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL to PO-MU/4
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - MIXED USE; all per Article
28 MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS: DETAILED
REQUIREMENTS; Sections 2802.3-7 and 2803 of
Zoning Ordinance 9500.
REQUEST To recommend the Final Application for Major Use
Special Permit for the Commodore Bay project.
BACKGROUND Under the Major Use Special Permit process the
Commodore Bay project preliminary plan has been
reviewed by the PAB on June 20, 1984, and by the
City Commission on June 28, 1984. The final
plan review was rescheduled by the PAB from
July 13, 1984 to September 5, 1984. It is the
general intent of the Major Use Special Permit
to include, in one action, zoning district
classifications, other zoning actions, and other
City ordinances that would be necessary for a
building permit application to be considered.
PA8 9/12/84
ITEM #I
PAGE 1
. .. ^i'.!w ;r:^.. . - .. r�• :'.. ..•t.:, ^ire.. �:a•.:'aL�'11•.:.��:r•%••. ,.. ... � •'I' ... .. I. •. •�.•. ..i ..
ANALYSIS The project proposes a mixed -use planned
development (PD-MU) with: restaurants, outdoor
cafes and shops along an open Street and Plaza;
apartments set above shops; parking and service
underground.
The residential portion of the project proposes
131 one bedroom, 52 two bedroom, and 14
efficiencies, for a total of 178,000 gross sq.
ft.
The Commercial portion proposes 29,000 sq. ft.
of restaurants and 29,000 sq. ft. of shops. A
third category designated wood pavilions would
provide for craft shops, artist shops, and
associated offices or apartments for a total of
80,000 gross sq. ft.
A combination private and public parking =
facility is proposed, all below grade, with 256
spaces reserved for resident parking and 396
for public parking for a total of 230,000 sq.
ft. for 626 spaces.
RECOMMENDATIONS
PLANNING DEPT. Approval, with acceptance of proffered covenant
tying development to approved site plan. (See
Planning Department recommendation attached.)
HERITAGE CONSERVATION BOARD Approval "in accordance with approved site and
landscape plan. Resolution # HC 84-22, June 19,
1984.
PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD Continued from September 5, 1984
On September 12, 1984, the Board accepted
Planning Department revisions: a) revised site
plan without marina; b) deviation from
Waterfront Charter Amendment: (bayfront) 60'
required; 35' supplied; (view corridor) property
is 248' wide; 25% or 62' required; 16' supplied
and c) 396 public parking spaces rather the 370
and made the following codifications: a) sewer
and water improvements by developers; b) arts
and condominium rental agreements to be on file
and c) baywalk to open during business hours of
retail uses on site. The Board then made the
following recommendations.
PAD 9/12/81
ITEM it
PAfid4�wj'349
i p-. ..A".Y'!i."•' raC�:•! ;�.,Tw:. :. «.�. 7. ... �.•:.�. .. .fyC•'-d'„y..i� .ieL:..i'�•\+7��' _
--
r
Denial of the Major Use Special permit. z.
Tffo-fi"Eh to approve tied 3-3 constituting denial; r
5 votes needed for a recommendation.)
Denial if the change of Zoning to RS-1/4.
oti on to deny tied 3-3 constituting denial; 5
votes needed for a recommendation)
Denial if the change of zoning from the proposed
KS-1/4 to PD-P•1U/4.
(Motion to deny tied 3-3 cdnsti tuti ng denial; 5
votes needed for a recommendation.)
CITY COMMISSION At its meeting of September 20, 1984, the City
Commission continued action on the Major Use
Special Permit.
At its meeting of September 20, 1984, the City
Commission passed the change of zoning to RS-1/4
on First Reading.
At its meeting of September 20, 1984, the City
Commission passed the change of zoning from the
proposed RS-1/4 to PD-MU/4 on First Reading.
At its meeting of October 25, 1984, the City
Commission continued both the change of zonings
and the Major Use Special Permit request.
At its meeting of November 15, 1984, the City
Commission continued both the change of zonings
and the Major Use Special Permit request to
a special meeting to be held on December 12, 1984
after 6:00 PM.
PAS 9112/84
ITEM i1
PAGE 3
Tea": .s.r?':.• i��t•eM�M�a+4'.'*.a:......w.r....:••.:l+Iy�1�Yjijl+���t.•i„•y`4,;;,�..4af.�'i••r::4t+.9\�
Denial of the Major Use Special permit.
o ion to approve tied 3-3 constituting denial;
5 votes needed for a recommendation.)
Denial if the change of Zoning to RS-1/4.
.on on to deny tied 3-3 constituting denial; 5
votes needed for a recommendation)
Denial if the change of zoning from the proposed
R 1 /4' to PD tU/4.
(Motion to deny tied 3-3 constituting denial; 5
votes needed for a recommendation.)
CITY COMMISSION At its meeting of September 20, 1984, the City
Commission continued action on the Major Use
Special Permit.
At its meeting of September 20, 1984, the City
Commission passed the change of zoning to RS-1/4
on First Reading.
At its meeting of September 20, 1984, the City
Commission passed the change of zoning from the
proposed RS-1/4 to PD-MU/4 on First Reading.
At its meeting of October 25, 1984, the City
Commission continued both the change of zonings
and the Major Use Special Permit request.
At its meeting of November 15, 1984, the City
Commission continued both the change of zonings
and the Major Use Special Permit request to
a special meeting to be held on December 12, 1984
after 6:00 PM.
PAS 9/12/84
ITEM N1
PAGE 3
84-*1349
W"Jaw"10,
_
4m,
vt
T-An rm"M P-1-
ins, ER
I
rilti 71
AQ! -A
11M. Llkf% t • %I
1. Sol 4
to fMli
117 V. N o"• ., LFO
lei
d,
V
ry T
IN:ijj
Q IM OM
OL
7
re
70
U
v
—n-
is I
QMjWAA AL
It-RS go, _
it. x
Oz
ft voj�j
oklf,
tiv *n"
AN
r� VA.*
V
OYU!
c
W
K -
A
0416
tip
<
TR
x
;A,
NWNT..-A
•n�;x;vs'i .' -'� a•'f �rti- •1�i`.�"�I t t"'�ry'�� .i."" wla r'R .r,•,V ,
Ar a
-5,
r
Vwk:1 r
I XR( 'rlk %
Stu
-xi � WR,
73
SIC
e • •xx
xi0'
.n.a2-m4:N• , -
•
r 9 16
Ilk% 6 -4nf kxL
:'JIG X-ft
- OWN.
fj•Up ,yam r
AM' u
-gn -- N -0 'T
Orj j :.Z. -;
AJOP
31
AS
1984
PAS S
A
prox: 31171 t
iAOL
ti+��•►•'P'.:'4�sii�iWu3'�i'�i��+�•t?�'r ;c•;...a - ... .. ...��!�"t�'��d�+'1�1�,i?�'. —
rt
.. .. .. .r... ... �'[... �•.r� . .... .. .. .. a
;'.^( -1 i :f. .. `IAA
Planning Advisory Board August 31, 1984 s
Analysis and Recommenda-
tions for Commodore Bay
Project
Sergio Rodriguez
Executive Secretary
Planning Advisory Board •~
PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS
Economic Impact - Of major concern, given that this request
represents an extension of the SPI-2 commercial district
development, is the economic impact on the existing downtown
Coconut Grove retail growth. The Planning Department has
reviewed statistical measures of market demand, existing and
proposed development in Coconut Grove and concludes that the
impact of Commodore Bay:
1. Will not absorb levels of retail market demand
essential to the continued growth of the Coconut Grove
Village Center,
_--- 2. May have a reinforcing effect of increasing overall
_ competitive market attraction of the Coconut Grove
Village Center, and
3. May compete with similar specialty theme marketing
_ proposed at Dinner Key, depending on respective
marketing strategies for attracting families, certain
Income groups, and age groups, and the extent they
overlap or not.
The Planning Department therefore finds that the Commodore Bay
project will be an acceptable economic impact provided planned
- commercial space is limited to proposed levels and marketing
strategies reinforce attraction. of the Village Center shopper
— profile.
To further strengthen the linkage between the retail project
activities and the village center, small structures housing
retail activities should be located along the eastern property '
line between Main Highway and the beginning of the project retail
space, located within the hammock but facing a pedestrian walkway
along the St. Stephens Church alleyway. These activities would
provide a comfortable and continuous pedestrian entrance to the
Page t of
.;�,�i��tfw}�:��^h�u�1h���aM��: ii.'y::,,tif.r.�'r.:�.�.a�'�!r1.•
.w •.q. r*'lL
-- .• '.fit
Planning Advisory Board
August 31, 1984
project that would reduce the dependence on automobile access.
However, to mitigate the exception to historic bans on
development in the hammock, three measures should control the
development of these structures: P
1. A wood frame vernacular design reflective of pioneer
architecture should control the architectural design.
2. The height should be limited to one story with a
traditional hipped roofline. A second level loft space
within the roofline may be added.
3. Ground level use of the structures should be limited to
arts organizations engaged in the creation of fine
arts, cruets and performance art, with rental rates
subsidized to an affordable level (see
recommendations). A second level, if added, could
house civic organizations offices, commercial art
galleries, tourism related business offices and
residential/artist studios at rental rates not to
e*ceed twice the ground floor rents.
Traffic Im act - Commodore Bay will impact primarily on two
Z—Fitical Intersectionsq Commodore Plaza and Main Highway, and
Main Highway and McFarlane Road/Grand Avenue. Both of these
intersections today function ata level of service E'or at highly
congested levels. The primary .concern is how exiting and
entering traffic to Commodore Bay will affect the levels of
service at these intersections. Department review of traffic
statistics, projections and trip generation rates for the project
produces the following conclusions:
1. With two entrances to the project on Main Highway at
Commodore Plaza and the St. Stephens Church alley
abutting the project site, and with an exit and
entrance at McFarlane Road two hundred feet south of
the Main Highway intersection, there is no significant '
impact on the operation of either critical
intersection.
2. A second proposed traffic scheme forcing all entering
and exiting traffic from the project 'i�tirough the
Commodore Plaza/Main Highway intersection is
unacceptable as it results in diminished levels of
service from Main Highway .traffic and probable severe
back-up congestion for traffic exiting the Commodore
Bay project.
Page 2 of 7
4
94w4349
ir►
Planning Advisory Board August 31,
A traffic signal at Main Highway and Commodore
should be installed.
The Planning Department therefore finds ttiat traf;ic impacts from
an access scheme with three entrances and a single exit to
McFarlane Road are acceptable provided a traffic signal is
installed at Main Highway and Commodore Plaza. Additional
traffic channelization measures to provide a left turn bay from
Main Highway southbound to the St. Stephens alley and striping
for right turns form Grand to McFarlane Road will also be
required. Further consideration should be given to "demand
phasing" of the Main/McFarlane/Grand intersection signal.
Environmental Impact - The hammock area comprising the northern
one-third of the property is a designated environmental
preservation district and must be preserved intact as a tropical
hardwood hammock.
The project proposal is to maintain an average 500 foot setback
from Main Highway with Development occurring from that point to
within 35 feet of the bay shoreline. Major trees exist within
that area, the three largest of which are near the center of the
project and will be maintained in place. The shoreline is
proposed to be left in its natural state, with a plaza to be
constructed along the upland edge of the shoreline. All trees to
be relocated have been identified on a tree protection and
relocation plan approved by the Environmental Preservation Review
Board. Removal of weed and exotic trees that threaten the
balance of native hardwood species in the Hammock has been
proposed, along with reestablishment of additional native hammock
trees in their place. The Department finds that proposed
measures to protect natural featOres and site ecology are
acceptable.
Visual Impact - The potential impact of the project on adjoining
open space 19 a major concern. The Barnacle State Park relies on
maintaining a visually primitive edge to its property to maintain
the original context of the historic site. The development
proposal eliminates the penthouse and cupola levels within three
hundred feet of the Bayfront along the Barnacle property line and
agrees to submit detailed landscape plans for the visual
screening of the Commodore Bay project from the Barnacle. All
such landscape plans would be subject to Environmental
Preservation Board Review and Planning Department approval
through the PD-MU Class C permit process.
The adjacent Peacock Park property must likewise be screened from
the visual intrusion of building along the property line
Page 3 of 7
�19 ��
I
arrl+ra�a�iu�;At:�.+i`r'.-:.,�itiNN�f/ 'ti�4'i.'r� •%i�+�v='K►h+
Planning Advisory Board
August 31, 1984
adjoining the ball diamond/open space area. To maintain the
openness and pastoral qualities of Peacock Park as a respite from
increasing intensities along Bayshore Drive, building heights
within three hundred and fifty feet of the bay shoreline should
be limited to no greater than the prevailing height of existing
vegetation and proposed landscaping (tree relocations and new
landscaping) along the park boundary. To further insure no
visual intrusion occurs, the average building height above .
finished project grade (including criteria) should not exceed
thirty-six' within two hundred and fifty feet of the bay
shoreline. Final landscaping including removal of undesirable.
exotics should be at full cost to the project.
An inverse environmental impact involves the use of Peacock Park
for athletic and festival/concert events both day and night, and
their impact on residential units facing the park. It should be
stipulated that the project developer shall agree that
condominium sales and rental agreements for all retail and
residential space will clearly express the public's right to use
Peacock Park for active sporting, festival and musical events
within the limits of municipal noise and curfew ordinances, and
their precedence over considerations of annoyance or nuisance
impacts on tenants. Moreover, the City's right to install
improved lighting for field game activities is acknowledged by
the project and accepted along with on -going improvements to the
park consistent with public recreational needs.
A temporary impact due to the probable inability of the project
contractor to access the site through the hammock will be the
need to cross Peacock Park with heavy construction equipment.
All safety requirements and site restoration costs shall be born
by the developer.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
Approval of the zoning change: to sector 4, the zoning change to
PO-MU,and issuance of the Major Use Special Permit, subject to
the following conditions:
A. Project Parameters -
1. The total number of residential -units shall not exceed
one hundred and ninety-five (195).
2. The total retail square footage shall not exceed fifty-
eight thousand (58,000) gross square feet of enclosed
space, not including specialty retail activities
permitted within arts pavilions (see section W .
Pages 4 of 7
R
Planning Advisory Board
August 31, 1984
3. All final project building dimensions shall conform to
those shown on site plans and elevation drawings
submitted pursuant to this *application with the
acknowledgement that side setbacks may encroach on
required yard areas not more that one and one-half (1
1/2) feet and building height for penthouse units and
ornamental roof structures may exceed height limits by
not more than ten (10) feet.
4. Total parking spaces provided shall be not less than.
two hundred and fifty-six (256) spaces for exclusive
residential use and three hundred and seventy (370)
spaces for public use. -
B. Special Site Design Requirements
1. Arts pavilions shall be setback from the property line
ten (10) feet except that decks or open porch
structures may extend to the property line.
2. The aggregate foot print of the arts pavilions shall
not exceed eleven thousand (119000) square feet and
shall be set clear of the ground level to permit
natural drainage and ground water absorption below the
structures.
3. Height of the art pavilions shall not exceed one story
with a hip roof and an optional loft space within the
attic space of the roofline, and the design reflective
of wooden vernacular pioneer architecture.
4. All tree removal and relocation shall be in accord with
a master tree protection plan approved by the
environmental preservation review board.
5. Additional landscaping along both side property lines
.••
within three hundred and fifty feet of the bay
shoreline and located within ten feet of either side of
the property line shall be provided by the developer to
generally screen project facades tp the roofline. All
final landscape plans shall be 'reviewed by the
Environmental Preservation Review Board and approved by
the Planning Department as per PD-MU class C permit. A 5-year'
covenant providing for replacement in kind and size Of
all trees planted to fulfill this requirement for a
final Certificate of Occupancy shall be provided. This
is in recognition of the difficulty in establishing
Page 5 of 7
.�:.�.»xxe..i. ~♦...xirAl3l.''•`��G�'i�',�!•���i�,'p���it' �7��til1'!S�!i�
I ••• •. • ' •,• • .•yam. • • .. .� • -
r 1 ,
Planning Advisory Board August 31, 1984
transplanted trees in soil and salt conditions within
ten feet of sea level. All removal of undesirable
exotic plants to accommodate thjs landscape plan shall
be by and at the cost of the developer..
6. A covenant providing permanent public access along the
waterfront, during normal business hours, both to and
from the Peacock Park and Barnacle State Park
properties as may be desired by the City of Miami and
the State of Florida, shall be provided,
7. Building heights along Peacock Park boundary within two
hundred and fifty feet of the bay shoreline shall not
exceed an average height above finished project grade
of thirty-six feet.
8. Building heights along Barnacle State Park shall not
include a penthouse level or ornamental roof structures
as shown on preliminary development plans.
9. Design of internal vehicular drives shall not permit
direct movement from Main Highway to adjoining
properties without entering the internal circulation
drives of the principal structure.
C. Traffic and Access Requirements
1. Vehicular ingress to the site shall consist of not
fewer than three points located on Main Highway at
Commodore Plaza and the easterly property line, and on
McFarlane Road. Egress from the site shall be limited
to McFarlane Road.
2. All traffic improvements to public right of way related
to implementation of this project shall be at the
expense of the project developer, including
signalization of Main Highway and Commodore Plaza
intersection and striping of turning lanes on Main
Highway and Grand Avenue.
3. Large truck, sanitation or similar service vehicles
shall be prohibited from entry through the hammock to
preserve the tree canopy from damage.
D. Special Use Requirements and Limitations
1. Occupancy of the ground floor level of the art
pavilions shall be limited to use by arts organizations
Page 6 of 7
■
• tw.• ..:1M 1's �.iV�.•:2i���p�`3.Pi .'�-'•�VR�f��"F�p.r'•rd�ij -.
} .�wo
owo
-
i
Planning Advisory Board
August 31, 1984
engaged in the creation of fine arts, crafts, and
performance art. Display and sales of original artwork
and crafts is permitted and encouraged. Instruction
and creation of artwork, crafts and performance skills
is permitted and encouraged. Rental rates charged to
occupants of the ground level space may not exceed the
developers debt service on construction/permanent loans
exclusive of land costs, and may include cost of taxes,
insurance and maintenance for the structure only.
2. Occupancy of the loft space may include these uses
listed in (1) above and in addition offices of civic
organizations, commercial art galleries, tourism
related business offices excluding travel agencies and
residential/artist studios at rental rates not to
exceed twice the allowable rate of ground level rents
as defined in (1) above.
3. The property owner of the Commodore Bay project shall
make available to the City of Miami upon request, all
necessary documents required to certify the conformance
of the established rental rates to the standards set
forth herein in section D-1 and 2 above.
4. All rental, lease and condominium sales agreements
shall contain express language to the effect that all
tenants acknowledge and accept the public's right to
-_
continued use of Peacock Park for active day and night
sporting, festival and musical events within the limits
—_
of citywide municipal noise and curfew ordinances and
the precedence of such activities over the annoyance
and nuisance impacts on the tenants and residents. In
-
addition, all tenants accept the City's right to
install improved lighting to municipal recreation field
--
standards and all other on -going improvements to
_
Peacock Park consistent with public recreational use.
5. Use of Peacock Park for construction equipment access
-
=_
to the site will require appropriate safety measures
and site restoration agreements as may be required by
the City of Miami Parks Department.
B. Other Requirements
All recommendations include respective comments and
requirements of the Public Works and Parks Departments.
_
In addition, the Major Use Special Permit may include
customary requirements.
Page 7 of 7 84*-1349
.
1
v�
APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT File Number MU-84D05
June 15, 1984
it is intended that major use special permits be required wherg specified uses and/or
occupancies involve matters deemed to be of city-wide or area -wide importance.
The City Commission shall be solely responsible for determinations on applications
for major use special permits. (See Article 28.)
The City Commission shall refer all applications for major use special permits to the =
Planning Advisory Board and to the director of the Department of Planning for
recommendations, and may make referrals to other agencies, bodies, or officers,
either through the Department of Planning or directly, for review, analysis, and/or
technical findings and determinations and reports thereon. (Section 2301.S.)
- 1, Howard Scharlin , hereby apply to the Director of Plan-
ning of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions
of Article 28 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance.
X_ Address of Property Approximately 3471 Main Hwy.
X Nature of Proposed Use (Be specific) A Planned Development, mixed -use
(P.D.M.U.) with: Restaurants, outdoor cafes and shops along an open
Street and Plaza; Apartments set above the shops; parking and service
underground.
- r
Preliminary Application s
1 attach the following in support or explanation of the Preliminary. Application:
X I. Two copies of a survey of -the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered t
Land Surveyor.
X 2. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of
• interest form (Forms 4-83 and 4a-83, attach to application).
X I Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375 foot radius from the outside
boundaries of property covered by this application (Form 8-83, attach to applica-
tion).
Page I of 3
Form 16-83 Revised
84!'I349
♦ i66
4. Maps of: (a) existing zoning and (b) adopted comprehensive plan designations for
the area on and around the property covered by this application.
X S. General location map, showing relation fo the site or activiiy to major streets,
schools; existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and
adjoining the project, and. the like..
6. Concept Plan
X (a) Site Plan and relevant information. Sections 51013 (a through h) and
2304.2.1 (d through h).
(b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed future uses, activities,
systems and facilities. Section 2802.3.2(a).
(c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan
principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special
permits, change of zoning, or exemptions. Section 2802.3.2(b).
7. Developmental Impact Study (an application for Development approval for a
Development of Regional Impact may substitute).
8. Other (Be spacific)
9. Fee of $ , based on the following:
(a) $.01 per sq•ft. of building(s). Additional fees for any required special permits -
changes of zoning, or variances shall be in accord with zoning fees as listed in
Section 62-61 of the City Code.
(b) Fee tabulation
Building(s)
Other (Specify) -
Total
Page 2 of 3
Form 16-83 84mmIL3.49
••a,a►kiru�r.�49�rt'!!�w?w?i#!l/+or�>t11�+5i1 1Mi•�t"r, ;4•a..
E
i
Final Application
1 attach the following additional information in support or explanation of the final
application:
Signature
er_Authorized Agent
Name Howard Scharlin Address 1399 SW 1st Ave. '
City, State, Tip Miami Fl. 33130 Phone 358-4222
This appii%;ation is `approved denied - -
in accord with City Commission Resolution No.
other
Sergio Rodriguez, Director
Planning Department
Date
r
4
Page 3 of 3
Form 1 &83
84mv 349
..-• . s � •►r •• •►•!.•+ ••w �+ww.:f�ww�-*.r:.a."`.1! : wr.roi7Cwi" Kj+�Rt`r'.�b . .. 'tes' �,., Fe�+b�e #!
r •. ' � 1.
t
• i
F7
DESIGNATION !=
MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN
F. Coconut Grove Village Center: Encourage
concentrated development and continuous
retail use. Provide centralized parking
facilities. Improve the public rights -of -way
for pedestrian use.
Y Y4.�w+'.t I •..
• � s� �-4
C•
Gy
• • 1. .n. 0{1•
KATCHER, SCHARMN AND I-tNZETTA
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
UNITED NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
1399 S.W. riRST AVENUE
MIAM2, FLORMA, 33130
GERALD KATCHER
HOWARD R. SCHARLIN TELEPHONE 3g8-4E22
JOHN A.LANiETTA AREA COOS 305
June 15, 1984
City of Miami
Miami, Florida
Re: Real Property More Particularly Described
On The Exhibit Annexed Here Which Property
Extends From Hain Highway At The Easterly
Extension Of Commodore Plaza To The Shore of
Biscayne Bay
Gentlemen:
I am addressing this letter to you in my capacity
as attorney and agent of all of the owners of the
sub-'ect property. Please be advised:
a. All of the owners desire to proceed with
development according to regulations existing when the
map amendment creating the PD District is passed with
such modifications as may be set by the City Commission
in the manner provided in Section 503 of the City
Zoning Code.
b. All of the owners intend to conform in the
process of development to the preliminary development
concept plan and to proposals for staging of
development, according to the requirements imposed by
the City of Miami for development in a PD District.
c. All of the owners intend to provide such
bonds, dedications, easements, guarantees, agreements,
deeds of trust, contracts and/or covenants acceptable
SA-13Q9
t9;
• iii�'%%TAT.7�Yt�.i�'is'il�+l���:L�n�,�1� . - 1:'��'•tir:::w::Fr *i.�
e
.. �..��.. •.�+r.. `. .t�.♦�...'. ..`:.' fib:; • •' ;;K�
i
� L
1 I III ,
City of Miami
June 15, 1984
Page Two
to the City Commission as may be reasonably necessary
to protect public interest in completion of such
development, according to approved plans and for
provision and continuing operation and maintenance of
such areas, facilities and functions as are not to be
provided, operated or maintained at general public
expense, and to provide such dedications, contributions
or guarantees as are required for provision of
needed public facilities and services.
Enclosures
very; ly yours,
Howard R. Scharlin
8010013419
s9-
1.
DISCLOSURE OF C1 NMHIP
Legal description and street address of subject real property:
SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ANNEXED
2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership.
Dote: City of Miami Ordinance No. 9419 requires disclosure of all parties
aving a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject
matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission.
Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of all shareholders of
corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties,
together with their addresses and proportionate interest.
1. Ken Triester 2699 S. Bayshore Drive, Suite #100D Miami, FL 33133
(305) 858-2416 - 50%
2. Howard R. Scharlin 1399 S.W. 1 Avenue, 4th Floor, Miami, FL 33130
(305) 358-4222 - 25%
3. Gerald Katcher 1399 S.W. 1 Avenue, 4th Floor, Miami, FL 33130
(305) 358-4333 - 25%
3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a)
owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within
375 feet of the subject real property.
NONE
HOW RD R. SCHARLIN, ESQ.
STATE OF FLORIDA ) SS:
COUYPY OF DADE )
�-t UJ0.V1 11. (Lo DY K iLt , being duly sworn, deposes and
says that he is the Uwner) (Attorney tor oumer) of the real property
described in answer to question #1, above; that he has read the foregoing
answers and that the same are true and complete; and (if acting as attorney
for owner) that he has authority to execute this Disclosure of Ownership
form on behalf of the owner.
Name
SWORN TO AND BED
before this If
day of , 9s_ .
MY CO►AKISSI4 EXPIRES:
�? 0' Z�- � Jjt�:�
Notary Public, StatVbt
Florida at Large
84-1349
(over)
STATE OF FLORIDA ) SS:
COU-NiY OF DADE )
being duly sworn, deposes and
says ME Re is a MY appointea of
the owner of the real property descr M answer to question , ve`;
that he has read the foregoing answers; that the same are true and com-
plete; and that he has the authority to execute this Disclosure of owner-
ship fozm on behalf of the owner.
(SEAL)
:Name
Stti W TO PAID SUBSCRIBED
before me this
day of r 1 8 .
Notary Public, State of
Florida at Large
W COMIMISSIOE EMPIRES:
Wwpe/ab/025
me " '. , I .
N •s -
M
...• . _`ILA.
i
• 1 Sir �'! �« •. ..�..� ►.. : "urM=.r +.: s '�.F � . .� 6J.• 1 . .. M ' M.• M•.nrwM'• .•. . �r� �.. r.r � r.. M • ,:
3eginning at the point of,intersection of the-Southerl•y boundary line'of'Tract.
'AP -and the U. S.. Harbor 'Line -Of 13iscaVne Bay as shown on the plat thereof '",
entitled "THE C'. W. EMERSON TRACT IN COCONUT GROVE,COUNTY, CITY OF MIAM1 DADE •
.LA." as*recorded In the •Pub)ic Records of Dade County, Florida in Plat Book
35 at Page 61;-thence N 340:g144,,' E alor.S said V. S. Harbor Line for a dis-
cance of 66.75 feet to a point, thence k 46°75•153 W along -the Northerly boundary
1 i ne of said Tract "A" for a distance .of 846. 10 feet to a point; thence S 43 °
34107" W for•etdistance of 66.0' to a pC:int on the Southerly boundary I•ine of
said Tract "A"; thence S 46*251.531, E.along the Southerly boundary line of Said.
Tract "A" for a distance of approximately 856.05' to the .Point of Beginning;
& containing 56,170 sq. ft. pore or less.
AND
Lot 7.-MONROE •PLAT, as recorded in Deed -Soak "D", at Page 253 of the Public
Records of Dade County, Florida, lying and being in the Southeast Quarter of
FRactional-Section 21 , Township 54 South,,, Range 41 East, Dade County, Florida,-,
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING: t -
Beginning at the point in the Northeast:boundary line of Lot 7, of the Subdivi-
sion of Lot 1, in Section 21, Township 54 Sou-th, Range 41 East,.in Dade County,.
Florida, as shown on the Plat recorded fn Died Book "D", on Page 253, of the
records of said County, where said line,•nrersects the center line of the County;
Road leading from Miami to Cutler; ther.cc' South 450 East along said l.iae, which
is also'the Southwest boundary of a lot formerly owned•by-Gharles Montgomery
467 feet -to a point 25 feet beyond the corner between the said ,Montgomery lot
and the lot heretofore conveyed by J. W: Frow .to Frank H. Kane,-3 and Evelyn M.
Kanen, his wife; thence South 450 West 0 feet; thence North 45° West 467 feet
to -the center *1 ine of above Road; thenc: North 450 East 'along said ,center line
10 feet to Point of Beginning.
ALSO EXCEPT, that part of Lot 7 of MONROE PLAT as per Plat thereof recorded in
Deed Book "D" , at Page 253, of the Pub.0 a Records . of Dade County, Florida, lying.
Northwest of the County Road, the said -parcel of land'being also described as
follows: Beginning at. a pipe set in cement marking •the location of the l i ghtwood.
stake 'set as marking the most Nort4woterly corner of said Lot 7; thence South
45° East 634 feet, more or less, to the cen.tef line of County Road (Dixie High
-
way) which line i s narked by a pi ep sei.Un_.cg_rent 35 feet from center l ine of w
;*a1 d Road . 'thence'-Norxheaster 1 y aTor ,%'�iie said' Ce'Tntef "1 i �e 'oF'';MNI"`�."buiity- bad't;"
.178.87 feet; thence North 45" West,•parallelling,.the Southwesterly tine of said'-
iLot 7. 460 feed, more or less, to a pipe set in cement in the South line of
'Grand Avenue which point is East of the Point of Beginning; thence west 253•feet
ivie or Its- Point of Beginnin*q;
ALSO EXCEPT. poftion•of Lot 7 of MONROE PLAT, as per Plat thereof r corded
in Deed Book u•-, at Page 253, Public Records of Dade County, Florida zo veyed.
y Jack R. Gardner et a) , to THE CITY OF MIAMI • a ici•ptl corporation;" T
�'
eed.dated August 6, 1947, recorded in Deed Book 291j,.Page 237, of the P iv•
ecords of Dade CoKmty, Florida; .
•!A44 OF THE FOREGOING SUBJECT TO ANY DEOICATIONS.LIKITATIONS, Rf ''IONS,
• RESCRUATIONM OR EA'0E:1ENTS OF RECORDS •
84-r1349
st •
• AFVIbAVJor
STATE OF MtdDA)
SS.
COUNTY OF DADS )
Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally
appeared tA%W %LYck R . L OND-VA %'T-a ,who being by me first duly sworn,
upon oath, deposes and says:
1. That he is the owner, or the legal representative of the
owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public heaizng as
required by Ordinance No. 9500 of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida,
eff(icting the real property located in the City of Miami as described and
listed on the pages attached to this affidavit and made a part thereof.
2. That all owners which he represents, if any, have given their
full and complete permission for him to act in their behalf for the change
or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in
the a.ccompanying petition. '
3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this
affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, phone n=bers and
legal descriptions for the real property which he is the owner or legal
representative.
4. The facts -as represented in the application and documents
submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct.
Further Affiant sayeth not.
Sworn to and Subscribed before me
this I S day of i wva 19gq. -
Nntary Public, State of Florida at Large
My Cm-itission Expires:
Ile
( SEJAL )
(NameI
r
94-PI349
1�-
OWNER'S LISP'
Owner's game Ken Triester
Nailing Address 2699 South $ayshore Drive, Suite MOOD ?tia� FL 33133
Telephone Number 305-858-2416
Legal Description:
See attached
Owner's Name Howard R. Scharlin
Mailing Address 1399 S.W. 1 Avenue, 4th Floor, Miami,_ FL 33130
Telephone Number 305-358-4222
Legal Description:
Owner's Name Gerald Katcher
Mailing Address 1.399 S.W. 1 Avenue, 4th Floor, Miani, FL 33130
Telephone Number 305-358-4333
Legal Description:
Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or sEverally
(by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375' of the subject
site is listed as follows:
Street Address Legal Description
None
Street Address
Street Address
Legal Description
Legal Description
84--1349
AW
• �i
�_ -
l
.. .�.
- - `� -r ....r�. �..... .►..... •.�iCf :'..r•�•t7. •. ..,...►......: �.� r.`• .t•i!►M.� • •. ... 4. '�n.vr-N++.v•. ... .'.+•�.i.•.�►rL....
Beginning at the point of, inter section •off the Southerly 'boundary 1 i•ne' of Tract,
"A" and the U. S..Harbor -Line -of Siscayne Say as shown on the plat thereof \
entitled "THE C. W. EMERSON 'TRACT IN COCONUT GROVE, CITY OF MIAM1 AlDADE COUNTY;'.
FLA." as recorded In the • Pub Iic Records of Dade County, Florida ; Plat Book•
35 at Page 61;•.thence N 34°:g144,11 E alor.1 said U. S. Harbor tine for a dis-
tance of 66.75 feet to a point, thence k 46 ,25•' S3 W along :the .Northerly boundary'--
line of said Tract "A" for a distance of $46. 10 feet tp a point; thence'S 43 °
34' 07" W for •a di stance of 66.0' to a .pr;i nt on the Southerly boundary line of
said Tract "A thence S 46*2515311 E .along the Southerly boundary line of said.
Tract "A" for a distance of apiiroximatel,y 856.05' to the .Point of Beginning; A '
& containing 56.170 sq. ft. nore or less r
ANO
Lot 7, i
.MONROE PLAT, as recorded in Deed .Book "D", at Page 253 of the Public
Records of Dade County, Florida, lying and being n the Southeast Quarter of
F•ract i ona l•- Section 21, Township 54 South. Range 41 East, Dade County, Florida,:
I
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING: ,. - ,
Beginning at the point in the Northeast boundary line of Lot 7, of the Subdivi-.
Sion of Lot 1 , i n Section 21 , Township ;�• Sou-th, Range 41 East, .i n Dadc County,'.
Florida, as shown on the Plat recorded Tr Oe:ed Book "D", on Page 253 of,the It
records of said County, where said line.•ntersects the center line of the County;
Road leading from Miami to Cutler; thence South 45' East along said line, which
i s • a 1 so 'the Southwest' boundary of a lot l orrner 1 y owned- by— Karl es Montgomery
467 feet -to is point •25 feet beyond the corner between the said Montgomery lot
and the lot heretofore conveyed by J. W. Frow,to Frank H.'Kanen and Evelyn M.,
Kanen his wife; thence South 450 West .•0 feet; thence North 45° .West• 467 feet
to -the center A ine of move Road; thenc t North 45° East 'along said ,center i ine
10 feet -to Point of Beginning.
ALSO EXCEPT that part of Lot 7 of MONROE PLAT as per Plat thereof recorded in
Deed Book 116" , at Page 253, of the -Pub" it Records -of Oade County, Florida lying.
;
Northwest of the County Road, the said -parcel of land being ai_so described as
follows: Beginning at.a pipe set in cement marking the location of the lightwood
stake'set as marking the most Norttwe;terly corner of said Lot 7; thence South
45° East 634 feet, more or less, to the center line of County Road (Dixie High-
way) which i ine i s marked by a, pi�e_se� in .c�tnen.t 35 feet_ from center 1 ine o.f
; a'l d Road: 'thence "NortheaSter l y * aTo?',-'" lie sai*d'. Gein'ler'"l i i+d-dF:ia
.:178,87 feet; thence North 450 west ,• parallelling the Southwesteirly line of *aid"•
iLot 7, 460 feet.' more or less, to a pipe set in cement 'in the South I ine of
:Grand Avenue wh i ch point is East of the Point of Beginning; thence West 253-feet
note or less rn Point of Beginning;
AL50 EXCEPT c 'poftion •of Lot 7. of MONROE PLAT, as per• -Plat thereof r corded
in Deed Book •wl, at Page 253, Public Records of Dade County, Floridea, ro veyed
y Jack R. Gardner et al , to THE CITY OF MIAMI ; a dci•p1l , corporation;' y
eed.dated August 6� 1941 recorded in Deed Book 291j,.Page 237, of the P lip*
-- ecords of Dade County, Florida;
•f ALL OF THE FOREGOING SUBJECT TO ANY DEDICATIONS,LIMITATIONS, Rf' " "LIONS,
RESCRUATION: OR EAE:IENTS OF RECORDS.
' set •,,
i t ;��
_ •..
i
��f7i
. � J� as
KENNETH TRUSTER
architect
August 17, 1984
Mr. Sergio Rolciquez, Director.
Cit:: of ?latlnbl:j D.epartmenr
273 v� 2ni +t.
.ami PIOCL+1a 33128
Re : Say ?Co jest - Zep:)rt
Dear szcg lo:
The following is the repar,t retltlLcatl toy Section 510.2 for
our ap"A Lcati0q.
1. The owners :)t this pr.opee.ty •Flown on the attao-had
3=7ay a-673 R1 ay 3iac-lyrle En4ine'3*,itltj 4-2ted 7-day 17r
1984, are :ioward Seharlin and Gerald hatcher, 134W W l.st
hve., Miami rl. 3313.1, •an.i Kenneth Traistnr, 2099 S.
Sayshore Drive, Suite 1000-D, Miami, Florida 33133.
This is to-")onfirin that the owners will zonform to the
,�relimitlary development concept plan submitted this d4ta,
amended, is ampinlp.-J. The owliecs will pcovitle the necessary
and required bonds, easements, agreements, etc.' required.
2. We are enclosing .a survey showing the pcopecty lines,
eKistinq features, alleys, ease%tents etc. ai; raquiroM by
510.2.2.
3. ?celiminary development concept plan has been :3t1.b+ilitted
this •say i+1 wirtl Ceq'iLr, aWailrS of SpCtion 510.110!
4. Tree •jimr.iy i:3 -:1c1:)sed. The tcaffit: coax.e Ct antl th-.
Etaasibiliry eitpocF. `3�1:),VL�ltj tilt' tyfftiak of the Cetall
:1ava1:)pnent Oil the -tKi Stint' cotail of ^oa.onut +ac)VIX. will be
Il%and delivac.-M -13 yogi r'!tIlle-ited 1)n 4')n:1•1y 4.11g1lst 20.
5. Tni+; Javelt pment will not be developed in st•iyt33.
1
,.Apy.,N,.,....
.s
.� 2099 S. Hapihors Drive Cocalut Grove, Florida 33133 859-Z414' :
c11%t�11i�1M W,: 04'ems•
5. ;:�rtiEy LIVAt the rdev,:1r) ers will eltablish,
t.oattatiatly operate, and maintain all the r.oin:n•)n arAtaa.
Ea i l Lt Lr3ci, •1111d 11it4 9 the Co n nr)r1 61`31' of t1l't
publi. retail portion of the ti--avetopment for -ill i-)ersony
Vt1itillt] 1.-1113 ;)U:111 , 11,' .v; and will est-ablish d cotidomintum
•94.4ociation .-I'rli-Ch in c-onc ert with the will
establish, continuously opecatF', and lalataba t hc? common
aceas of the condominium Apartment (Ievelop,iient. 3oth of
the above manage•ne•lh• oprarationss will have ,areas,
E.u,Alities, aad improvements that will be :;r)nttnued..
r)pecated, and maintatn+ed wtt•hr)ilt EUtr.101 eKf)a3rlgr? to the
t3�c.>rly?rs •�E t;le City :.)E Miami.
7. T1,111, is ::) t.•artiCy til:it th:1 dev(10.0jers will t!atdi)tish
re?atriative c.ovenaflts to be reaocded to coin with the 1!411d
WLi:i1. Ce.7�l�c;t t) tile? Jr )J•?Y ase of tile? .9$cic'tot):n�tlt.
IE the3r-a i� •ally :01itLr)rl!il inEoemation cequiced plea3e umll
the L n a, l i �tf:ly sr) .h•i t we will rl:)t :ietdy theac:hr:ri,lt+.rl
he•a-rin3s tm.E•-)re the ?I -inning Advisory Roard on 3a9teinbec 3
- and the City Co•mnitisi.-)n hearing September. 20, 1934.
Sincerely,
_._ Cotamolo re Say
)was^d Scharf in ate
Y Y,?/
Wister -D to
CR:H
enclosures
Sword beEoce me this day of
Auy ust, 1 4.
.... • _..... •.... Notary Publ 3 c
�4'• :��;:e 7. IUC STATE OF ORIDA
.7
NOTARY PUCO MISSION WIRES CC 23 1967
.. io;,o�.� n+Iw aNL4 Rj$U%m%%CE U►NC
.I�MMF-� ► �� • _ • •• �.• a•Yl•� _ •• • •. . �. �. • f •• • .�..�.•. .« •..:i•.•il..• • ... • .. •`AR•.r,t
s
.a
I
N + • V-
f
KENNETH TRUSTER
architect �'� �•s'�•
1961 AUS i' ° l�
August 17, 1984 :►�ia�'�J_.._.• :E..:.
fir. Sergio Rodciyuez, director
c/o Mr. John Lef1t:;
City of ?Miami Planning Department
275 Wti 2nd St.
Miami Florida 33128
Re: co,nmodore Say ?ro j ect
Dear Sergio:
In response to your letter of autjust 17, T am ent;losing the
followin3:
1. C.omiaodore Say Statistics;
2. Commodore A.iy Zoning Fact Sheet.
A new set of drawings with additional di.nensions Will i-Iz
delivered to your office later this afternoon.
Please have your st,3 f f review these immea Lately and call my
office today if you nei-m a(mition31 inform.%tion.
The Macket Study showing the effect on othp:c cet•-ill ce—Is
in the weave, and the Traffic Study, will Oe dt?liv%?r�d to
yo-ir office at ouc meetiaq Monday August 20. I know you
will un:itir.3tand that the .July agendas -ille
to fa-ilt.y advertisement, it is igw.cative we s)e •>n the
Pl-inning Advisory 3o;iM S-qo telmbec 20 atjenda •md the
eptembtic 20 City Co:n•nission agenda. I 'Know you will Rio
everything po.-isiblo to pl•tc a the proper AdR. AR we
previously -mentioned, we will be vecy .gyp; c•.ciative LE you
will putt us t-)n as ELcst )c secotld on the September. 20
Since ely,
K nneth Treister
�cT:H
%c:losuces
Z609 S. Hayshore Drive Coconut Crcive. FloriAtt 33133 �r� t•:"� E
1.stylrwr. '�' tc.
COMMODORE BAY
ZONING FACT SHEET
SCHARL[N - 'rREISTER
SECTOR 1 - FUI 39
1. yet Area of Lot
2. Allowable Floor Area
37' to middle of Main highway, 39' into
Barnacle Historic Site, Biscayne Bay and
Peacock Park
(Section 2006.2.2) '
3. Gross Area of Site
iJet Area of Lot & Allowable Floor Area
308,000 + 110,110
4. Floor Area Ratio (F.A.B. )
Total Enclosed Area ; Gross Area
249,000 418,110
(Section 2011.1.1) the following values
-ire taken from pg. 20-24 of Zoning Text:
Use Intensity Ratinq (L.U.1)
Open Space Ratio (O. S. H. )
LivabU ity Snare Ratio (L.S.B.)
Recreation Space Ratio (R. S.B. )
5. Total 3uilt Area (Footprint).
Apt!i. + Retail + Pavilions
31,023 + 59,000 + 12001)
( Sect ions 2012. 3. 1, 2012.3.2 )
6, Gross Unbuilt Area
;ross Arsaa of Site - Tut�t i3uilt Area
418,110 - 117,355
August 15, 1984
308,000
110, 110
418,110
56
.70
.40
.0-1
117,355 28%
300,755
a�-
` July R 1484
COMMODORE BAY STATISTICS
I. RESIDENTIAL
UNIT
TOTAL 9
SQ. FT.
TOTAL
SUB-
OF
UNIT TYPE PER UNIT
S FT.
TOTAL
-ANITS�
Efficiency S00
7,000
--
14
One Bedroom -
Type "A" 720
59,760
83
--
One Bedroom -
w Type "B" 850
40,800
48
131
Two Bedroom
Type "C" 900
14,400
16
--
Two Bedroom
Type "D" 11000
20,000
20
--
Two Bedroom
Type "E" 1,100
17,600
16
52
NET TOTAL:
159,560
'
197
PLUS CORRIDOR 6 SERVICE AREA: 18,440
GROSS TOTAL:
178•,000
sq. ft.
II: COMMERCIAL
1) MAIN BUILDING RESTAURANTS 6 SHOPS
A) APPROXIMATE MIX
1) RESTAURANTS &
CAFES 29,000
sq. ft.
2) SHOPS
291000
sq. ft.
z
=- SUBTOTAL
58,000 sq. ft.
- 2) WOOD PAVILLIONS
A) CRAFT`SHOPS
11,000
sq. ft.
e B) SHOPS OR OFFICES
11.000
sq. ft.
SUBTOTAL
22,000 sq. ft.
TOTAL
80.000 sq. ft.
- III. PARKING SPACES (ALL UNDERGROUND PUBLIC 6
RESIDENTS PARKING
(SEGREGATED)
STAND.
COMP.
H.C.
TOTAL
UPPER LEVEL
196
216
13
425 .
-- LOWER LEVEL
110
106
6
222
TOTAL:
306
322
19
*647•
- *RESIDENTS PARKING (195 X 1.25)
_. 244 spaces
*PUBLIC PARKING
n 03 spaces
•
647 spaces
NOTE: TOTAL APPROXIMATE PARKING
AREA 230,000'
sq. ft.
$134$
•.� • r r' .•,, . = r• ,. ,'i►t(ii�l.u►:i:awy L t..ili=�; y� l
.. r ;!i:s1►i%lwtj..tiis •:..i4 � ..r.� : ' w � i �. �V s r
.. _.. `.� .: �•' :.^��Yr'.• :':.:`.. • ••ter ' ,1..�.1•'.
- �r:7•A'YRt�^7.'.�--..�T,-'.�••r�..�......s•:... DTI. ..a1.1.�: -.
t
CITY OF MIAMI,
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
�_o2 _ct1
To Howard V. Gary DATE: October 16, 1984 ME -
City Manager
SUBJECT: Commodore Bay Major Use
Special Permit Modification
FROM REFERENCES:
,Sergi •Rodriguez, Director
Planning Department ENCLOSURES-
Planning
accord with the September 20, 1984 City Commission requests
pursuant to approval on first reading of the Major Use Special
Permit for the Commodore Bay project and after discussions with
interested citizens and adjacent property owners, the following
changes, additions and deletions have been made to the Major Use
Special Permit for Commodore Bay:
1) Restaurant space has been reduced by 5000 square feet and
equivalent square footage transferred into retail shopping
space — request of Public Works to reduce impact on Sewers.
2) Arts Pavilions shall be set back an addition five (5) feet in
the event an access road is needed in the future.
3) Requirement to use internal :drives before entering adjacent
properties has been deleted — St. Stephens Church will not
allow adjacent property to be used.
4) Access requirements for three entrance drives has been
changed to require only one entrance drive intersecting Main
Highway at Commodore Plaza as per the Departments proposal on
September 20th.
5) Requirements to preserve the coral rock wall along the
Peacock Park Boundary have been added at the request of local
residents.
6) Requirements to submit all final plans to the Environmental
Preservation Review Beard have been restated in the Major Use
Special Permit to reinforce current requirements of the
Environmental Preservation District Ordinance.
7) A statement providing that no height variances shall be
granted has been added as per citizen requests before the
Commission.
Page 1 of 2 84t"'13A in
Howard V. Gary
City Manager
October 16, 1984
8) Requirements for a two lane road intersecting Main Highway at
Commodore Plaza have been added as per revised access plan.
9) A new requirement that all construction and service vehicle
access to the site be limited to the new two lane access road
has been added at the request of the St. Stephens Church
School. The prior requirement that such vehicles use St.
Stephens property has been deleted.
10) A provision that the Public Works Director may request a
second access drive be constructed along the northeastern
property line if traffic conditions warrant has been added as
per Commission concerns that consideration be given' to a
future access drive.
11) Developer proffered amenities including 250 coconut palms and
picnic shelters for Peacock Park have been added to permit
requirements.
12) An eight foot coral rock wall is required to be built along
the project boundary with St. Stephens Church as per requests
of the church school parents.
13) Use of peacock Park for construction vehicle access is
prohibited as per the City Manager's policy.
14) A remote site arts pavilions is required to be built by the
developer or a cash contribution made for its construction as
per addendum included in Commission Motion to approve project
on first reading.
SR/JLL/dr
Page 2 of 2
aPI-349