HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-84-1393I
RESOLUTION N0. 84"`1393
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE MIAMI CENTER II
DUPONT PLAZA PROJECT DEVELOPMENT ORDER
(RESOLUTIONS NO. 81-840, SEPTEMBER 249
1981; AND 82-71, JANUARY 28, 19820 AS
AMENDED) BY AMENDING CONDITION 26 TO
EXTEND THE TIME WITHIN WHICH SUBSTANTIAL
DEVELOPMENT IS TO BEGIN FROM TWO YEARS
AND TWO HUNDRED TWENTY-TWO DAYS TO TWO
YEARS AND THREE HUNDRED FORTY-EIGHT DAYS
OF THE RECORDED DATE OF SAID DEVELOPMENT
ORDER; -,FINDING THAT SUCH AMENDMENT DOES
NOT CONSTITUTE A SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION
UNDER CHAPTER 380, FLORIDA STATUTES;
CONTINUING THE DECEMBER 13, 1984, PUBLIC
HEARING TO 3:30 PM, THURSDAY,
FEBRUARY 149 1985, OR A RECONVENED
MEETING, TO CONSIDER OTHER AMENDMENTS TO
THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER AND WHETHER SUCH
AMENDMENTS CONSTITUTE SUBSTANTIAL
DEVIATIONS; FURTHER,iDIRECTING THE CITY
CLERK TO TRANSMIT COPIES OF THIS
RESOLUTION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
AFFAIRS AND THE SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL
PLANNING COUNCIL.
WHEREAS, the City of Miami Commission by Resolution No.
81-840; September 24, 1981, issued a Development Order, approving
with modifications the Miami Center II Project, a Development of
Regional Impact to be located on all of Blocks 2, 3 and 4 DuPont
Plaza (50-11), which Development Order was modified by the City
of Miami Commission by Resolution No. 82-71; January 28, 1982.
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 83-1006; October 27, 1983, the
recorded date of the Development Order was confirmed as May 12,
1982; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 84-527, May 10, 1984, the City
Commission extended the Development Order by 75 days; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 84-762, July 12, 1984, the City
Commission continued the hearing to July 31, 1984, and extended
the Development Order by 5 days to July 31, 1984; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 94-916, July 319 1984, the
Commission extended the Development Order by 85 days to
October 24, 1984; and
WHEREAS, by Motion No. 84-1139; October 10, 1984, the
Development Order was continued by 57 days to December 20, 19849
pending a public hearing on December 13, 1984; and CITY COMMISSION
MEETING OF
DEC J5 1
DN No. ARAW
WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting
of December 5, 1984, Item No. 11, following an advertised
hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 126-84, by a 6 to 0 vote,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of a time extension to the Development
Order, as hereinafter set forth and continued other proposed
amendments to the Planning Advisory Board meeting of January 16,
1985; and
WHEREAS, the Commission considers that a time extension
within which substantial development is to begin would be
advantageous to the City of Miami, Metropolitan Dade County and
the State of Florida; and
WHEREAS, the Commission has established a public hearing for
December 12, 1984, to consider amendments; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission desires to give affected
parties the opportunity to be heard on whether further time
extensions and consideration of other amendments constitute
substantial deviations under Chapter 380, Florida Statutes;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The City Commission, following an advertised
public hearing at which interested parties were given the
opportunity to be heard, hereby finds that the following
amendments to Condition 26 of the Miami Center II DuPont Plaza
Project Development Order (Resolutions No. 81-840, September 24,
1981, and 82-71, January 28, 1982) do not constitute a
substantial deviation under Florida Statutes, Chapter 380.06 (17)
(a)-(b) (1983).
Section 2. The Miami Center II DuPont Plaza Project
Development Order issued by Resolution No. 81-8409 September 24,
1981, and amended by Resolution No. 82-71, January 28, 19829 is
hereby further amended, only in respect to time, in the following
particulars.1
1Words and/or figures stricken through shall be deleted.
Underscored words and/or figures shall be added. The remaining
provisions are now in effect and remain unchanged. Asterisks
indicated omitted and unchanged material.
-2-
Condition 26 of the Development Order is hereby amended as
follows:
1126. The Development Order shall be null and void if
substantial development has not begun in two (2) years
and three hundred forty
eight (348) days of the recorded date of this
Development Order or by , 1964f April 25,
1985. Substantial development is defined herein as
the achievement of the following items:
-- start of construction of building foundations for
Condominium Tower and garage;
-- obtaining all required permits, variances, and
approvals;
-- preparation and approval of raised pedestrian
circulation element plans;
-- dedication of all right-of-way;
-- the deposit of all monies, bonds, or letters of
credit for surface street improvements with the
County or the State;
-- finalization of a public sector financing package
and/or a private sector front -ending agreement for
construction of the I-95 bifurcated ramps;
-- construction of the drainage system for the
Condominium Tower and Miami Center II garage."
Section 3. The public hearing on this item, advertised for
3:30 PM Thursday, December 13, 1984, is hereby continued to 3:30
PM, Thursday, February 14, 19859 City Hall, or a reconvened
meeting, for consideration of other amendments, proffered by the
developer, to the Miami Center II DuPont Plaza Project
Development Order and whether such amendments constitute
substantial deviations.
Section 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to immediately
send certified copies of this Resolution to the Florida
Department of Community Affairs, Division of Local Resource
Management, 2571 Executive Center Circle East, Tallahassee,
Florida, 32301; to the South Florida Regional Planning Council,
3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 140, Hollywood, Florida 33021; to
the Miami Center Joint Venture and Miami Center Limited
Partnership, 300 Miami Center, 100 Chopin Plaza, Miami, Florida,
33131, and to Mr. John W. Kozyak, Kozyak and Tropin, New World
Tower, 100 N. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 607, Miami, Florida,
33132.
_. r
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th__ day of December 1984. R
Maurice A. Ferre
MAURICE A. FERRE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
Ralp G. Ongie, City Cle
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
� w56. W/
A istant Cit Attorney
APPROVED AZ/TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS:
Lucia A. Dough,Wrty
City Attorney,"
-4-
RALPH G. ONGIE
City Cie•i.
MATT1 HIRAd
Au grant 0tv Clerk
DEPUTY CM CLERKS
Robert E. Tingley
Gcorb,a !v1 lrtlte
Sylvia M. MPnri�fa
Evel'o PIZO
Svhia luwr»an
STAFF SUPPORT
Lillian Di(km—i
January 79 1985
Mr. John W. Kozyak
Kozyak and Tropin
New World Tower
100 N, Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 607
Miami, Florida 33132
RE: MIAMI CENTER II DUPONT PLAZA PROJECT
Dear Mr. Kozyak:
Enclosed herein please find a copy of Resolution No. 84-13939
passed and adopted by the City of Miami Commission at its meeting
held on December 13, 1984, which is self explanatory.
On behalf of the City of Miami, thank you for your attention.
ry truly yours,
Gam'.
Ra ph G. Ongie
City Clerk
RGO:sl
ENC: a/s
OFF iCE OF THE CITY CLERK / City Hall / 3S00 Pan Ametican Drivr / P.O. Bug 330700 ! Mwv,., Florida 33233-0:3—, OUS) 579 GOGS
} Sy —1393
i
a,
y
t�.
� M
ai
,fi
a
R.ALPH G. ONGIE
City Clete
M ATTY HIRkI
A505tanr Cir,i Clerk
DEPUTY CITY CLERKS
Robert E. Tingley
Georgia M. Little
Sylvia M. Mendo?a
Evel,c, Rizo
Sylvia Lowman
STAFF SUPPORT
Lillian Dickmon
January 7,
Miami Center Joint Venture and
Miami Center Limited Partnership
300 Miami Center
100 Chopin Plaza
Miami, Florida 33131
MIAMI CENTER II DUPONT PLAZA PROJECT
Dear Sir :
Enclosed herein please find a copy of Resolution No. 84-1393,
passed and adopted by the City of Miami Commission at its meeting
held on December 13, 19849 which is self explanatory.
On behalf of the City of Miami, thank you for your attention.
ery truly yours,
Ra ph G. Ongie
City Clerk
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK / City Hall / 3500 Pan American Drive / P.O. Box 330708 / Miami, Florida 33233-0708 / I30S! S79-6065
3`
rr�a
J
RALPH G. ONGIE
City Clerk
MATTY HIRAI
Assistant City Clerk
DEPUTY CITY CLERKS
Robert E. Tingley
Georgia M. Little
Sylvia M. Mendoza
Evelio Rizo
Sylvia Lowman
STAFF SUPPORT
Lillian Dickmon
January 79 1985
Mr. Michael Garretson
Director
Florida Department of Community Affairs
Division of Local Resource Management
2571 Executive Center Circle East
Tallahassee, Florida 32301
RE: MIAMI CENTER II DUPONT PLAZA PROJECT
Dear Mr. Garretson:
Enclosed herein please find a copy of Resolution No. 84-1393,
passed and adopted by the City of Miami Commission at its meeting
held on December 13, 1984., which is self explanatory.
On behalf of the City of Miami, thank you for your attention.
Very truly yours,
al h G. Ongie
ity Clerk
RGO:sl
ENC: a/s
OFFICF OF THE CITY CLERK / City Hall / 3500 Pan American Drive / P.O. Box 330708 / Miami, Florida 33233-0708 / (305) 579-6065
gy- i39..3
RALPH G. ONGIE
City Clerk
MATTY HIRAI
O Assistant City Clerk
DEPUTY CITY CLERKS
Robert E. Tingley
Georgia M. little
Sylvia M. Mendoza
Evelio Rizo
Sylvia Lowman
STAFF SUPPORT
Lillian Dickmon
January 7, 1985
Mr. Barry Peterson
Director
South Florida Planning Council
3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 140
Hollywood, Florida 33021
RE: MIAMI CENTER II DUPONT PLAZA PROJECT
Dear Mr. Peterson:
Enclosed herein please find a copy of Resolution No. 84-13939
passed and adopted by the City of Miami Commission at its meeting
held on December 13, 1984., which is self explanatory.
On behalf of the City of Miami, thank you for your attention.
ry truly yours,
lG.n ie
0 g
City Clerk
RGO:sl
• ENC: a/s
OFFICE Of THE CITY CLERK / City Hall / 3500 Pan American Drive / P.O. Bou 330708 / Miami, Florida 33233-0708 / (305) 579-6065
�y -1-3
84-ml3 ' -
EXCERPTS
MIAMI CENTER II
DEVELOPMENT ORDER
1
�w
rats • . •+,;•.•r,.i . rr�• w't'!?.,�+
�%!V'1 • s is • • r .i . •
'•� •.t i `� w •y 43.E
The Applicant Shall%
the obligation to pay for
and construct the pedes-
trian connections in 104.
i
12a. Reach. agreement
with the City` concerning
the remaining pedestrian
circulation system issues
as described in 12b with-
in 210 %days of the is-
suance of this Development
Order, based on either the
Applicant's and Southeast
Batik' s approved plan ' or,
in the event of disagree-
ment, tha plan as ap-
proved by the Miami'City
Commission and make a
complete, report to the
South Florida Regional
Planning Council. on 10a,
Ila and 12a, as amend-
ment to'the Application -
for Development Approval.
Nothing shall relieve the
Applicant of its obliga-
tion to pay for and con-
struct the . pedestrian
connections in 10a.
13a. Have prepared, in
colloboration with con•-
sultants for the Florida
• Department of Transporta-
tion . a technical opera-
tions and impact analysis
of certain modifications
to the current traffic
concept plan adopted by
MPO Resolution 1-81;
January 26, 1981 and which
modifications as not forth •
in Figure 3 attached
*Modified Recommended
Highway System Plan" have
been recommended by the
A
�� a a•r
;•'yat , �•t• ri .•t +� psi
•
The City Shall s ..
be granted for complete
operation of the project
until the required pedes-
trian circulation system
elements are completed,
contingent on performance
by Southeast Bank/Gerald
D. Hines Interests, the
DuPont Plaza Hotel and
the owners of the Pan
Ameridan Bank Building;
provided that certificates
"• of occupancy will be
granted for completed pro-
y:�,• ject elements (Paragraph
'1) when the related pedes-
trian circulation system
elements have been c=-
' ' • pleted.
12b. Resolve the remain-
ing pedestrian circulation
.System issues of construc-
tion, ownership,: insu-
rance, security and util-
ity access .and reach
agreement with'the Appli-
cant within 210 days of
-the issuance of this
Development Order, recog-
nizing the increased tax
revenues to be generated
upon -project completion.
•
0
13b. -Hereby approve, in
conceft the "MoZi pied
Recommended Highway Sys- '
tem Plan" (Figure 3
attached) as recommended
by the DuPont Plaza Task
Force September 2, 1981;
it being understood that
that MPO will be urged to
substitute this plan for
the plan previously
adopted by MPO Resolution
1-81; January 26, 2.981.
The City shall contiaus .,
to urge FOOT to maintain
• •r
•
}
• • •r we 1% A
rk.
II4II � �I , I ,^,•,_.� _. • _ . I � � I �J��ill�lill�ll�lll�llll�lillldlil IIIII��Y�i i�i9®I�IY
1 : jr 1 : •
• hi
AK
j • r
•
•
• ;CIi �1 �,�• 1�
t
��•
- . i •
.� iti 1 `�M • t
3 ,``yam••
• 4 .' `} • l
to
•.
a or
3
r f
is "�•�`••��
• �: • ti•�j..•
IW
;I
,,�..y,�.xnsaristit �g`'MOM$'t ,
11//J i J -t'•• .�/���i�r-J, .i;'�),i �J -i •....._y�t�� ,' .. ..�.r• V ��. � 1
• • • +♦ ! �- .• ♦ ra� �iw•..js'i ;�r �.�!r �, .. ' ' • �r I .• • •=� :.."w�'•J �xf( f♦a • : :i'1 � �:• . •� '��a.,�Z�• 1�
• : ' •� ,!�' '� ' LI
`•, -'.• \t!y : • 1 {�• =•�••1•:• !•l,•: ri;:;• .' �•M; ..-GIs' •. : i f , 7;,,
.1 ~� • • 1j K
••• . + �• I''';i•;'�'• �= 1 :�w y• . • r. _'•' ; ; 1 ; •f►•1•il/I �; B•tv� �". �w • 1 :":•M 'SAi.�r%/1 /,
.. • . `�„ � 1, 1 1' • i •,+ � �'t' •+' :•s••>'� � • j l• • I • i' �� • '1 l / t� ;•, t'�• � ~�j•1 ��'• • r •�M� • � � •i
te: r • f ' �I'f/twJQ l.�sa.,c'.: Y:1 I • i i 1 �.: ►` - •1.
r:: J.l.''' { •
� � /"�, :i •• �i'�•::�i alt' •�_�� 1 !.. ��� - ••�• •••• �•• •' .� fix!
• • � � •`•. � '�j�•7.,1��'•t•: i• ••� ��• :I j•• ••.. 1 (tf•-•�L �♦•�•t.•:1�' •ill.• •�
i r • •eat 1SJ2«.-''Q_ros•. (1�'�+ :-+ �.i�--a•--rT yr /� •• -�• �, , / it / � T.j_,. .�� , ,—�xt— j • 1 �• ,. .�•.� ... : .. :•. _ •' �. •L •(� i
ON
Zt
! ' _ •.tt�`../�' � '•+o!'•T!%. •�•���;• ••t,,;,L'. •s-••��ai i.t.�•'' t �i:l R• _�'a_ _•� ►,.. �•'.-�•�••t1'•'1•.. ::`.�'�C�f:rQ%S:.vbtl'Z J�•�''i����,,i ••1' ,•
.. .r ••« 1•.q.���u •I ••• \ _,-�.,.:_�.:=u.l'--=•t • .tt�11 .�..�, 1� /• • � 1'r ��i �•'••.. !!��„ �_� '1. •-.r y� �„r� .i.. � r � .�• �t
.. ` .�_ j � • �• , j .• - i•�.YI' .i!.y ,' • !� f+�q� 7� ;1 � 1j-` .. • as � . � •• t �: � y •, « • • •, •�. i.t i . • •a •, • • � �
' ..��\ !•�` � .: ... i tty'i .l�=•=. •.ice '; 1 .�{,. s , . a�•.• � �rltF
•• • �" '•11 • �♦ \ • •••�.•t ••1't •i •• L ICI' • •/1.•,•y1y,•••WN • • •• •• :i -', P�
• •• _ ire `l• F1� �•� '- _':.-;�� • �_i'•=-'�� �� �-•... .. ,: �'.'.�:►•�r•: � • �
h .. •�..:;"��•...'..:.� ... •.. ,..ter..•.., ...... •.ii.•.ws' "
gove _
• • • '• .1 .r-...r►. Tip•►If•�•P.•r i... ^�.^ ... .-.•i. w •� �•.•t.•.
• i ► -�+ 1 `.In�..�: �o...� • •�: �,•t.+.rT �•� .r.ti-•' ;t�'•• •. a.,{!i � faolt+'1u �� ! _ _ '••...� r`
1 (.y1.�t1••�i.a•. 1 ,,,, •%11i� NJ•.tJ •
•ED RECO1QdEt3�C� Ad recommended by the DuPont Plaza Task ForC T
• ' _/ �'I�I 3 110DIF� f •9_2_81. to bo forwarded to the 11P0 as n Sub —
FIGURE f
HIGHWAY YSTEU PLAN
r stitute for the plan previously adopted by
• 11P0 Resolution 1-81 ; January 260 1'JBs. :'.•;i
r Pt
r
•
•-.
• .••.��•i
ryr•+•al�.•ai�rru•
•
w • . •i•• ••w
-
.. ..
.�,j,•S•
.•-. •irr. ... rti
•
�•ii•• •aYal. raii�
+
4
The Applicant Sballs
DuPont Plaza Task Force
on September 2, 1981,
with the participation of
the Applicant, Southeast'
Bank Financial Center/
Gerald D.'ines Interests
and the Dupont Plaza
Hotel. '
•Upon the granting of all
variances and conditional
use permits necessary for `
the development of Miami
Center 11, as discussed
in Paragraph 1 hereof,
and the obtainment of any
necessary action or agree.
meats from the City rem
quired for the coast.-uc-
tioa of the Miami Center
11 g3ra;u, the Applicant
shall dedicate all ease -
meats and right-of-way,
owned by the Applicant,
required by the City,
County and State to im-
plement for provide access.
to) required transporta-
tion and second level
pedestrian system improve-
ments, specifically in-
cluding required dedica-
tions along the north
right-cf-way line of SE
4th Street (Biscayne
Boulevard Way).
14a. Assume that the
FDOT has a consultant
under contract by Septem-
ber Il, 1981 for the task
outlined in'14b, committed
to completing const.-action
documents either a) 12
months thereafter or b) 12
months prior to the esta-
blished completion of
construction of the Miami
Avenue Bridge, whichever
conditions are. more len-
ient; failing which:
The Applicant shall pre-
pare, according to speci-
fications to be agreed
upon with FDOT, design
and engineering plans of
the =-95 bifurcated ramps
to the surface streets
and Miami Center 1
garages twee Figure 3),
and obtain final FDOT
approval thereof; such
documents, if required,
shall be completed by
February, 19®3.
The City $halls
at least one -north -bound
lane from the Brickell
Bridge to SE 2nd Avenue,
to SE 3rd Street to $E
3rd Avenue.
The City shall not grant
a building permit until a
COPY of this Development
Order has been transmit-
ted to the South Florida
Regional Planning Council
and a period of 45 days
has elapsed from the data
of issuance of this
=.....:.Development Order.
14b. It Is expected that
the FDOT will have a con-
sultant under contract by
September 12, 1981 ccm-
mitted to completing con-
struction documents 12
months thereafter.
Failing which:
The City shall prepare
plans, specifications and
estimates for the design
and engineering of all.
surface street improve-
ments in DuPont Pla=a,
such documents, if re- .
quired shall be completed •
by September, 1982. (See
City Commission Resolution
81-113; February 26, 1981.)
',•Ili
tai�i+lt�rriri.wrr�...••�r
• + •.
TTIle
.. P • i •. ...
The Applicant Shslls
An a condition of issuing
a building permit, the
applicant agrees to pro-
vide a maintenance of
traffic plan and a con-
struction employee park-
ing plan b}- calendar quar-
ters until July, 1984 or
the issu-nice of a certi-
ficate •of occupancy for
structures in Miami. Cen-
ter Iit to be approved by
the City.
ISa. Fund, bond, or pro-
vide a letter of credit to
the County and/or State
for up to $813,200 (in
1980 dollars) for State
and/or County contruction
of surface street imrpove-
ments in DuPont Plaza
generally similar to those
improvements-, shown on
pages 60-68 of the Report
and Recommendations of
the South Florida Regional
Planniztg Council (Exhibit
B) . It is assumed that
the total costs to Dade
County for the bCM system
shall not exceed those
costs which the .County
would have incurred had
the DuPont Plaza DCM
station been built as in
the conceptual transpor-
tation. plan adopted by
MPO Resolution 1-81; pro-
vided however; that any
additional costs for the
proposed relocation are
the responsibility of the
Applicant.
16. Construct, per speci-
fications to be agreed
upon by FDOT, the direct
ramps from the Miami Cen-
ter ' II garage to the
I-95 connector at an
appropriate time to be
determined by FDOT, to
insure simultaneous c=.
pletioni of the 1-95
bifurcated system.
16a. Cooperate with the
DuPont Plaza Hotel in
obtaining a direct ramp
connection from =-95 into
any new building erected
on the DuPont Plaza Rotel
site.
The City $halls
i
swysiw`. �
•� i
•.-i .. .:
r. i.ii • ..� w•i�lYii•i
� r
ISb. Insure that the re-
quired funding, bond or
letter of credit has been
provided prior to issuing
any building permits for
the proposed development
or certificates of occu-
pancy for any portion of
Miami Center I (Ball Point).
•M
r
i
e • ,T ' � �yyl
;•.nib � i• �• .. ..•••:.. • • � fit. „ -_ �,
• •.
Kieft
4•
The Applicant Shalls
The City Shalls
x
li. evaluate, in coda•-
bcraticn With the Dade •.
`
County Dept. of Traffic
-and Transportation, the
Dade County Office of
Transportation Admini-
'4
stration and Florida De-
It
'
partment of Transporta-
tion the recommended op-
?--
• --
tions, contained in the'
Report and Recommenda-
tions of the South Flom*
r;da Regional Planning
•
Council (Exhibit *B
and any other options
which may be feasible for
:•;:_; public sector financing
F
million in 1980
dollars) of the I-95
bifurcated ramps to the
Dupont Plaza surface
street system; and pre-
pared a report and recom-
mendations, to be sub-
."
matted to the Regional
.Planning Council, the
Metropolitan Planning
Or-ganization,
Downtown De-
velopmant Authority, and
Florida Department of
„F
Transportation for review
and comment within one
year of the date of the
Development Order, on the
preferred options which
r,
should be pursued, in -
eluding the steps neces-
'.
• wary to insure their
realization so that =a-
x'
struction • may begin im-
mediately after co•«ple-
tion of tee Miami AvenueT
Bridge project, Conside-
ration shall be given to
the increased ad valorem
revenues from Southeast
Bank and Miami Center I
(Ball Point) and IS in
funding these, necessary
•'
improvements.
18. -Front end act ($11.
68 million in 1980 dol-
lars) of the construction
costs of the I-95 bifur-
cated ramps by;
&I As a preferred
op-tion, arrange loans
-• to or bond purchase
from appropriata
governmental agen-
' Cies, based on an
• 1
r
-13- 84--13CML
�''~ $ 8 4 0
.
IL
i �+ y. • �iiir• •...• • M•'..
•..i.
Ise
•.ME
,:
,j
.• The Applicant. Shalls
The City Shall= '
equitable reimburses-
.
ment agreement among
,
appropriate parties
..
which shall specify
interest rates and
maturity dates; or
'
b) Arrange loans to, or
'
bond purchases fran
'
appropriate govern-
mental agencies, to
,
' be evidenced by tax-
: e.Yempt governmental
obligations which
are eligible for
pledging fat a mar-
ket value that
equals the full pur-
chase price) against
public deposits by
the State of Flo-
ridar as determined
by the Florida State
Constitution, State
,
Statutes or the State
.Controller; whichever
,
is applicable; if a
•�
public sector finan-
s '
• cing package has not
•
been commited by
September 30, 1982.
19a. Promote energy -con-
19b. Work closely with
nervation and the use of
the Downtown Development
public transit by parties-
Autl%ority, the Dade County '
pating in Transportation
Office of Transportation
• System• Management, coor-
Administration and the
dinated with the Dade
Applicant to promote tran-
County Office of Transpor-
sit use; shall encourage a
tation Administration,
downtown parking pricing
through such measures as
policy to discourage 8-
employer-subsidized ride-
hour use and shall con -
sharing programs and van
tinue enforcement efforts
pools; variable work hour
to restrict• or prohib;t
schedules such as staggered
on -street parking, all
work hours, flex -time and
of which are intended to
a 4-day wort, week; employer
maximiie the use of the
subsidized transit use
available roadway capa-
coupled with remote -site
city.
parking policy to dis-
courage 8-hour use. The
,
applicant shall prepare
a report for review with-
i
in 60 days of this Dev-•
velopment order.
:nerd•/' Conversation •t -•- :==
. �. ;::
Me Applicant shall:
~•
20. Prepare a technical feasibility
analysis for 'construction and
operation of a cogeneration facility, which analysis must ia•-
elude those elements specified
in SFR?C report (Exhibit '8"1
' s .?ram ��.*•s•'•' .. ,�• � ....
t
ttt
:i;•f OF *41A:d1. r! ORIOA
t^IT::�•Oi-slr,' :�1�IORAi`ti3::1�1
Howard V. Gary
City Manager
' o E. e s
Di re
Planning and Zoning Boards
Administration Department
November 16, 1984 It,LZ,
alj RESOLUTION - MIAMI CENTER II
APPROX 201-399 SE 2 AVENUE &
APPROX 201-399 SE 4 STREET
(BISCAYNE BOULEVARD WAY)
COMMISSION AGENDA - DECEMBER 130 198e
4NCL.CSUIES PLANNING AND ZONING ITEMS
It is recommended by the Planning
Department that recommendations
concerning a) a finding of no
substantial deviation and b)
amendments to the Miami Center II
DuPont Plaza Project Development
Order, a Development of Regional
Impact, located at approximately
201-399 SE 2 Avenue and
aoorox mate y 201-399.St 4 Street
(Biscayne Boulevara wa
approved.
The Planning Advisory Board, at its meetin of December 5, 1984, Item 2,
will consider recommendations -concerning a? a finding of no substantial
deviation and b) amendments to the Miami Center II DuPont Plaza Project
Development Order (Resolution 81-840; September 24, 1981 and 82-71; January
24, 1982 as amended) a Development of Regional Impact, located at
approximately 201-399 SE 2 Avenue and approximately 201-399 SE 4 Street
(Biscayne Boulevard Way), also described as all of Blocks 2, 3 and 4, DU
PONT PLAZA (50-11). The recommendations of. the Planning Advisory Board will
be presented at the City Commission meeting of December 13, 1984.
Backup information is included for your review.
A RESOLUTION has been prepared by the City Attorney's Office and submitted
for consideration of the City Commission.
AEPL:111
cc: Law Department
NOTE: Planning Department recommends: APPROVAL
\4n.. •r r
n
I
PLANNING FACT SHEET
APPLICANT City of Miami Planning Department: August 30, 1984
PETITION APPROXIMATELY 201-399 S.E. 2ND AVENUE;
APPROXIMATELY zol-3W S.E.
BOULEVARD WAY)
A1C`OF^ 9LUCK�"2, 3 AND 4 DU PONT PLAZA (50-11).
Consideration of a) a finding of no substantial
deviation and b) amendments to the Miami Center II
Ou Pont Plaza Project Development Order
(Resolutions 81-8401, September 24, 1981; 82-710
January 24, 1982; 84-527, May 10, 1984 and 84-9169
July 31, 1984) a Development of Regional Impact,
to be located in downtown Miami.
(Note: This item was continued from the Planning
Advisory Board meeting of November 14, 1984.)
REQUEST To extend the time limit for the Miami Center II
Du Pont Plaza project Development Order by 92 days
to January 249 1985 and recommending
January 10, 1985, as a future public hearing
date for the Commission to consider a further time
extension and other amendments.
BACKGROUND The Miami Center II Du Pont Plaza Development
Order (Resolutions 81-840; September 24, 19819 and
82-71; January 28, 1982) allowed the developer,
Miami Center Joint Venture, to proceed to develop
the three vacant blocks in Du Pont Plaza.
This Development Order allowed development of the
6 acre site to a Floor Area Ratio of 13.95 (net)
comprised of a 59-floor office tower, a 74-floor
condominium tower, a 4,000 car parking garage.
Public agencies have responded favorably to this
development by a) revising the I-95 approach to
Ou Pont Plaza through the bifurcated ramp, b)
relocating a proposed DCM station from east of SE
3rd Avenue to west of SE 3rd Avenue.
The Development Order obligated the developer to
certain conditions, among which were several which
were advantageous to downtown, the City of Mi ami ,
Metropolitan Dade County and the State of Florida,
summarized as follows:
Condition 10 a - joint funding of pedestrian
promenade and pedestrian
bridges.
PAS 12/5/84
1 teas i2
Page i
a
x a'•D. � �rx � �, 4�.
Condition 13 a - dedication of easements and
rights -of -way for the I-95
bifurcated ramp system and
pedestrian system, subject
to City grants of variances
and conditional use.
Condition 15 a - fund, bond, or provision of
a letter of credit for
$813,200 (in 1980 dollars)
or $9710000 (April 1984
dollars) for local street
improvements. Any
additional costs for
relocating DCM station on
3rd Street are the
developer's responsibility.
Condition 16 - Construction of direct ramps
from Miami Center II parking
garage to the I-95 t
connector. I
Condition 18 - Front end $11.68 million (in
1980 dollars) or $13.96
million (in April 1984
dollars) for I-95 bifurcated
ramp construction if a
public sector financing
package cannot be arranged.
The following actions have been taken previously
to extend the Development Order which would
otherwise become null and void in two years from
the date of the Development Order unless
substantial construction had commenced:
By Resolution 83-1006, October 27, 1983, the
recorded date of the Development Order was
confirmed as May 12, 1982.
-- By Resolution 84-527, May 10, 1984, the date
upon which the Development Order became null
and void was extended by 75 days (2 years and
75 days from May 12, 1984) or until
July 26, 1984.
-- By Resolution 84-762; July 12, 1984, the date
upon which the Development Order became null
and voi d was extended by 5 days (2 years and
80 days from May 12, 1984) or until
July 31, 1984.
PAB 12/5/84
I teat #2
Page 2
t
• �i s � �e"t�l i
"s
-- By Resolution 84-916, July 31, 1984, the date
upon which the Development Order became null
and voi d was extended by 85 days (2years and
}`y
165 days from May 121, 1982) or until
;
October 24, 1984.;w:.
ANALYSIS The implications of not extending the Development
Order would include,-"ror the developer, starting
over with a new Application to the South Florida
Regional Planning Council. For the public, the
implications would include loss of funding for the
Y
local street improvements in Ou Pont Plaza and
seriously jeopardizing the entire $38 million I-95
Connector Extension Project to Du Pont Plaza.
(Attachments from the Miami Center II Development
j Order are attached for information purposes.)
a
RECOMMENDATIONS
PLANNING DEPT. Approval of a 92 daffy extension to
January 249 1985; further recommending that the
Commission establish a public hearing date of
January 10, 1985, for the purpose of considering
amendments to the Miami Center II Development
• Order.
`y
PAB 12/5/84
Item #2
Page 3
84*wl39
0
bi ft-RI
td W-ml it
MIAMI
CEIV
AMEN
BRI
3
tract 'Ak**
C,
Cp
Oct
(M
S.E. -
A
27 41
;)C+.
10 11
A A Sh It
2 S. T.
.14 13 12 11 to 9 al
5
IS 7
3 4 3
Ld
3 IS T.
BISCAYNE -
213
A
-- BOULEVARD WAY
300
B C
00 4�b
`0 00
CHOPI N mwm*PLAg
TRACT D
I?
I
NO
PAB December 5,, 1984 AS 36
201-399 SE 2 Avenue
BRICKELL KEY ON.
1 ... p: .... ...
i
41
5.2
t— 1
M
O
IL
T
1pl_'
Ct
O
z
Pt,
N
V
tr
OD
M
lisp
8464
W M
1
PAB December 5, 1984 AS 36
201-399 SE 2 Avenue
LI