HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem #64 - First Reading OrdinanceIV
J-84-926(A)
9/28/84
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF ORDINANCE
NO. 9500, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
MIAMI, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING SUBSECTION 1533.3
OF SECTION 1530 ENTITLED SPI-3: COCONUT
GROVE MAJOR STREETS OVERLAY DISTRICT" BY
PROVIDING AN EXCEPTION TO THE HEIGHT LIMIT IN
RO-3/6 DISTRICTS; CONTAINING A REPEALER
PROVISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE.
WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board at its meeting of
September 19, 1984, Item No. 4, following an advertised hearing,
adopted Resolution No. PAB 106-84 by a 5 to t , RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL of amending Ordinance No. 9500, as a ed, as herein-
after set forth; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission, ft r arefu nsideration of
this matter, deems it advisable and n he best nterest of the
general welfare of the ity of Miam nd its inhabitants to grant
these amendments, as ere nafte s t forth;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT 0 I ED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. na c No. 9500, the Zoning Ordinance of
the City of Miami, or a is hereby amended by amending the
text of said or inance a follows:l
"ARTICL 15. SPI: SPECIAL PUBLIC INTEREST DISTRICTS
General Provisions
1
* n i
SF TION
N n
0. SPI-3: COCONUT GROVE MAJOR STREETS
OVERLAY DISTRICT.
I 1533. CLASS C SPECIAL PERMIT.
533.3. Special Height Limits.
Words and/or figures stricken through shall be deleted.
Underscored words and/or figures shall be added. Remaining
provisions remain unchanged. Asterisks indicate omitted and
unchanged material.
E
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA
L1J-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
To 5t�A20
Ralph G. Ong1 , .
City Clerk t,Lj'V'"'
C�jI
b� M`�M
DATE March 19, 1985 FILE
SUBJECT Ordinance Amending SPi-3-
Coconut Grove Major Streets
Overly District
FROM REFERENCES
1 E. Maxwell City Commission Agenda - Item
(:A istant City Attorney No. 21 - December 20th, 1984,
ENCLOSURES and City Commission Agenda Item
NO. 37 - anuary , 1985
This memo serves to confirm our recent telephone conver-
sation wherein I advised you that the referenced Agenda Item,
identified as J-84-926(A), was validly passed by the City
Commission during the referenced meetings, having had the two
hearings required of all zoning ordinances prior to passage and
adoption.
The subject ordinance was part of a much larger "Amendment
L" that was before the City Commission on first reading December
20, 1984. This item was identified on said Agenda as Item No.
21.
As the Clerk's minutes indicate, the specific section
pertaining to SPI-3 was lifted from the total "Amendment L"
package and separately passed on First Reading. The balance of
Amendment L was continued to a later meeting.
I am of the opinion that this passage by the Commission on
December 20, 1984, constituted a valid "First Reading" for the
SPi-3 Section.
On January loth, 1985, this excerpt returned to the City
Commission for its Second Reading. During said meeting it was
erroneously referred to by the Mayor as being there on First
Reading. As a result of this reference by the Mayor, the January
985, Clerk's Re ort was erroneously marked to show the
Item on "First Rea ing or that specific meeting, instead of the
correct "Second Reading."
Applicable City Charter, Code and Statutory provisions
mandate that Zoning Ordinances be read by title on two separate
occasions. This was done. Legal requirements have been complied
with. Absent some other legal impediment, the subject ordinance
should be published and codified by the City Clerk's Office.
i -
i
Ralph G. bngie March 19, 1985
City Clerk Page 2
Additionally, the scrivener's errors now contained in the
January loth, 1985, City Clerk's Rej2ort should be corrected to
show the proper sequence o "Readings- or this ordinance.
JEM/wpc/ab/399
cc: Lucia A. Dougherty, City Attorney
Walter Pierce, Asst. City Manager
Aurelio Perez-Lugones, Director
Planning and Zoning Boards Administration
Sergio Rodriguez, Director, Planning Department