HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-85-0073e
r r
1 J_?/85 RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ISSUING A MAJOR USE SPECIAL
PERMIT, ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A" AND
INCORPORATED HEREIN BY DEFERENCE; APPROVING
WITH CONDITIONS THE TERREMARK CENTRE PROJLCT,
PROPOSED BY GROVE RAY PLAZA LIMITED, FOR
APPROXIMATELY 2560-2580 TIGERTAIL AVENUE,
3204-3240 AVIATION AVENUE, AND 2583-2585
SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE, MAKI14G FINDINGS;
PROVIDING FOR ISSUANCE OF A CLASS C SPECIAL
PERMIT; PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A
SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO PERMIT A DRIVE-IN
6ANKING FACILITY; AND PROVIDING THAT SAID
MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SHALL RE BINDING ON
THE APPLICANT AND SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST.
WHEREAS, it is the intent that the Major Use Special Permit
shall be the instrument for implementing by one action,
authorized for issuance by the City Commission, all changes in
the adopted Comprehensive Plan, zoning district classifications,
other zoning actions or other City ordinances that would
otherwise be necessary to the accomplishment of the objectives
sought in the
application
for Major
Use Special Permit; and
WHEREAS,
Grove Bay
Plaza,
Limited has submitted an
Application for a Major Use Special Permit per Article 28: Major
Use Special Permits: Detailed Requirements of Zoning Ordinance
9500, for the Terremark Centre Project; and
WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting
held on July 18, 1984, by a 7 to 0 vote, reviewed the preliminary
application and recommended that the Applicant be permitted to
file a Final Application; and
WHEREAS, the Miami City Commission at its meeting held on
July 31, 1984, after reviewing the preliminary application,
adopted Resolution 84-903 permitting the Applicant to file a
Final Application; and
WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting
held on January 16, 1985, following an advertised public hearing
adopted Resolution No. PAB 8-85 by a 6 to 0 vote, recommending
approval of a Major Use Special Permit for the project; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission has conducted a public hearing,
having considered the Application for Major Use Special Permit;
CITY COMMISSION
and MEETING OF
J AN 24 1985
■
r r
WHEREAS, the City Commission in Resolution 85-7_9
Janna y 24 , 1985, has issued a Development Order, approving,
subject to conditions, the Terremark Centre Project, a
Development of Regional Impact, contingent on the issuance of a
Major Use Special Permit; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the
best interests of the general welfare of the City of Miami to
issue a Major Use Special Permit as hereinafter set forth;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
FINDINGS OF FACT
Section 1. The following findings of fact are made with
respect to the project:
a. The Commission has determined that the project is in
conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive
Neighborhood Plan.
b. The Commission has determined that the project is in
accord with the district zoning classification of Zoning
Ordinance 9500.
C. The City Commission finds that the project would not
create adverse impact on air quality, ground water,
soils, animal life, vegetation, wastewater management or
solid waste disposal, and further finds that it would
have a number of positive impacts including:
(1) Over 926 permanent jobs would be generated by the
project. Nearly 482 additional full-time jobs
would be generated in the four county region, with
nearly $9.6 million increase in total wages and
$14:1 million in value added to the regional
economy.
(2) An annual surplus of over $1,005,692 to taxing
jurisdictions with approximately $355,653 for
Miami, $386,664 for Dade County, $247,802 for the
School District, and $15,573 for the South Florida
Water Management District and special districts
combined.
,W
-2-
(3) The preparation of a Minority Participation and
Employment Plan, and a Minority Contractors/Sub-
contractors Participation Plan.
d. The City Commission finds that the adverse impacts
related to water demand, energy demand, solid waste
generation, demands on public services and traffic
generation will be mitigated by the conditions set forth
in Exhibit "A".
e. The City Commission finds that:
(1) The project will have a favorable impact on the
economy of the City; and
(2) The project will efficiently use public
transportation facilities; and
(3) The project will favorably affect the need for
people to find adequate housing reasonably
accessible to their places of employment; and
(4) The project will efficiently use necessary public
facilities; and
(5) The project will have a favorable impact on the
environment and natural resources of the City; and
(6) The project will not adversely affect living
conditions in the neighborhood; and
(7) The project would not adversely affect public
safety; and
(8) That there is a public need for the project.
Section 2. A Major Use Special Permit attached hereto as
Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof by reference, approving with
modifications, the Terremark Centre Project, a Development of
Regional Impact, proposed by Grove Bay Plaza, Limited, for all
that portion of Lot 1 less right-of-way; lots 2-4, 7-31 and
unnumbered lot also known as Lot 32, Block 39 NEW BISCAYNE
AMENDED (B-16), at approximately 2560-2580 Tigertail;
approximately 3204-3240 Aviation Avenue;•and approximately 2583-
2585 South Bayshore Drive, be and the same is hereby granted and
issued.
-3-
Section 3. A Special Exception to permit a drive-in banking
facility as indicated on attached plans entitled Terremark
Centre, sheet A-2, dated November 15, 19849 is hereby granted,
after due consideration to the adequacy of ingress and egress, to
automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access in case of fire or other emergency.
Section 4. The Planning Director is authorized to
subsequently issue a Class C permit in accordance with Zoning
District SPI-17 regulations.
Section 5. The Major Use Special Permit, as approved, shall
be binding upon the applicants and any successors in interest.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24th of January, 1985.
Maurice A. Ferre
MAURICE A. FERRE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
RALP G. ONG1E, CITY CL
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
� "01 �0• 2�b //I 'v'
L E. MAXWELL
VISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
LUCIA Vmr-D-OUGHORTY
CITY ATTORNEY
EXHIBIT "A"
ATTACHMENT TO
RESOLUTION
MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT
AND
DEVELOPMENT ORDER
Let it be known that the Commission of the City of Miami,
Florida, has considered in public hearing on January 24, 1985;
a) the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit pursuant to Section
2803, Article 28 Major Use Special Permits: Detailed Requirements
of Zoning Ordinance 9500 and b) the issuance of a Development
Order for a Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Section
380.06 Florida Statutes, said major use and development to be
located in the City of Miami, at approximately 2560-2580
Tigertail; approximately 3204-3240 Aviation Avenue; and
approximately 2583-2585 South Bayshore Drive, being
Lot 1 less right-of-way; lots 2-4, 7-31 and unnumbered
lot also known as Lot 32, Block 39 NEW BISCAYNE AMENDED
(B-16) .
ALL OF THE FOREGOING SUBJECT TO any dedications,
limitations, restrictions, reservations or easement of
record.
and after due consideration of the recommendations of the
Planning Director and Planning Advisory Board pertaining to the
Major Use Special Permit and after due consideration of the
consistency of this proposed development with pertinent
regulations and the Report and Recommendations of the South
Florida Regional Planning Council pertaining to the Development
of Regional Impact takes the following action:
Authorization to Issue a Major Use Special Permit
and
Approval of Application for Development Approval
both subject to the following modifications:
FINDING OF FACT WITH MODIFICATIONS
Development
1. The development proposed 724,900 gross square feet of floor
area, comprised of the following elements as specified by
the applicant in the Application for Development Approval.
Page 1 of 21
8577 I a3
f
A
Element
Office (18 stories)
Retail (ground level)
Residential (16 du's)
Parking (1050 spaces)
Recreation
Total
Floor Area (S.F.)
3149000
8,000
19,200
3339300
50,400
7249900
This project is described and limited as shown on maps N-11-G-19
N-11-H-19 N-11-H-29 N-11-H-39 N-11-H-49 N-11-H-59 N-11-H-6,
N 11 H-79 N-1 1-H-8, N- 1 1-H-9, N- 1 1-H- 10, and N-1 1-K- 1 submitted
to the South Florida Regional Planning Council on November 30,
1984, prepared by Bermello, Kurki and Vera, Inc.
The project is further limited by applicable provisions and
procedures of City of Miami Zoning Ordinance 9500, as follows:
Per Schedule of District Regulations, Page 3 of 6,
District RO (Residential -Office), and per conceptual
plan and design schematic plans on file dated
November 309 1984, prepared by Bermello, Kurki and
Vera, Inc., with the following parameters for the site
bounded by Aviation Avenue, Tigertail Avenue and South
Bayshore Drive:
Element Floor Area (S.F.)
Plaza (enclosed) 3,800 s.f.
Open Space 115,932 s.f.
Pedestrian Open Space 43,419 s.f.
Office Tower height 23719 10"
Garage height 45'
Residential height (TH) 45'
The project, as defined conceptually immediately above,
meets the requirements of Zoning Ordinance 9500 subject
to the submittal of construction documents in
conformity with Zoning Ordinance 9500 and applicable
City laws, precedent to the issuance of a building
permit, and the issuance of a Class C Special Permit as
required by Section 1552 of the Zoning Ordinance. This
Exhibit constitutes the conditions for a Major Use
Special Permit per Section 2803 of the Zoning
Ordinance.
THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS WILL:
1. Incorporate the following into the project design and
operation to minimize the cumulative impact of Terremark
traffic, and its associated pollutant emissions, on air
quality:
Page 2 of 21 85-.--'73
EXIMBIT "A"
f
H
i1ON1
-- designate five percent of employee parking spaces,
located as close as possible to elevator and building
entrances, for exclusive car or vanpool use.
-- actively encourage and promote car and van pooling by
establishing a car pool information program, and
offering preferred parking spaces and work shifts to car
and van poolers.
-- actively encourage and promote transit ridership by
providing regular shuttle service, pursuant to Condition
16 below, between the project and the Coconut Grove
Metrorail Station, and by providing Metrorail, Metrobus,
and shuttle service route and schedule information in
convenient locations throughout the project.
-- Promote staggered flex -time work schedules, four day
work weeks, or other management actions and marketing
strategies, that reduce peak demand for roadway capacity
and thereby reduce transportation energy use.
2. Design, construct, and maintain the stormwater management
system to meet the following standards:
-- Retain all washdown water from the parking garage in a
vegetated retention area with a raised catch basin(s)
that direct(s) any overflow to sedimentation boxes and,
subsequently, drainage wells.
-- Wash down parking areas only when there is adequate
storage capacity in the swale(s).
-- Construct all catch basins to retain oil and grease, and
regularly maintain the catch basins.
-- Vacuum sweep the garage area before every washdown.
3. Submit a revised drainage plan showing swale location,
dimensions, general runoff routing network, and calculations
which demonstrate adequate swale capacity to the Council for
review and approval before requesting any building permits
for the project and as part of the consolidated Application
for Development Approval required by Condition 19 below.
4. As part of the transportation improvements required in
Table 1, reconstruct the street drainage system for Aviation
Avenue, from South Bayshore Drive to Tigertail Avenue to
manage runoff from a 5-year storm by retaining the first 1.5
inches of runoff in french drains, with overflow from the
design storm discharging to Biscayne Bay. If underground
utilities prohibit use of french drains, the Applicant will
construct a drainage well system capable of managing the 5-
year storm.
Page 3 of 21
SS-'73
EXHIBIT "A"
5. Incorporate into the development, by restrictive covenant
and/or lease or sales agreements, as applicable, hazardous
materials accident prevention, mitigation, and response
standards, to be met by the Applicant and all tenants
classified by a SIC code listed Table 4 of the Council DRI
Assessment that use, handle, store, display, or generate
hazardous materials (ignitable, corrosive, toxic, or
reactive), including those identified in Table 5 of the
Council DRI Assessment; provided, however, that the uses in
Table 4 and the wastes in Table 5 shall be simultaneously
amended upon the addition or deletion of any or all of the
listed uses, materials, or wastes by amendment to the
"County and Regional Hazardous Waste Assessment Guidelines"
incorporated by reference into Rule 17-31.03(2)9 Florida
Administrative Code. At a minimum, these standards shall:
-- require that areas within buildings where hazardous
materials or hazardous wastes are to be used, displayed,
handled, generated, or stored shall be constructed with
impervious floors, without drains, to ensure containment
and facilitate cleanup of any spill or leakage.
-- require that the loading/unloading of any hazardous
material or hazardous waste shall occur in a covered
loading/unloading dock with a spill containment area not
connected to the project drainage or sewer system.
-- prohibit any outside storage of hazardous materials or
hazardous waste.
-- require all hazardous waste generators to contract with
a licensed public or private hazardous waste disposal
service or processing facility and to provide to Dade
County DERM copies of one of the following forms of
documentation of proper hazardous waste management
practices:
- a hazardous waste manifest;
- a shipment to a permitted hazardous waste management
facility; or
- a confirmation of receipt of materials from a
recycler or a waste exchange operation.
-- notify any tenant generating wastes of the penalties for
improper disposal of hazardous waste pursuant to Section
403.727, Florida Statutes.
-- Allow reasonable access to facilities for monitoring by
the City, Dade County DERM, and Florida DER to assure
compliance with this development order and all
applicable laws and regulations.
Page 4 of 21
85--'73
EM11BIT "A"
85. ►31.
6. Remove all invasive exotic plants from the project site as
the site is cleared, and amend the landscape plan to ensure
use of only those plant species included in Table 6 of the
Council DRI Assessment in future project landscaping.
7. Prior to any site clearing, consult with, and follow the
recommendations of, the Dade County Urban Forester
concerning transplanting trees presently on the site.
8. Delay construction up to three months in any area where
potentially significant historic or archaeological artifacts
are uncovered, and permit State and local historic
preservation officials to survey and excavate the site.
9. Obtain the necessary approvals from Dade WASA for water and
wastewater service.
10. Construct the building to allow emergency helicopter
evacuation from the roof.
11. Collaborate with the Police Department to incorporate
security measures and systems into the design and operation
of the project.
12. Enter into an agreement with the City to contribute a fair
share of capital facilities required to provide adequate
sanitary sewer and fire service to the project, or, in the
alternative, pay a fair share contribution pursuant to an
adopted City impact fee ordinance pertaining to fire service
and sanitary sewers if such impact fee ordinance is adopted
by the City prior to obtaining final certificates of
occupancy for more than 200,000 square feet of development
on -site.
13. Incorporate the following energy conservation measures into
the development:
-- Landscape shading of open spaces.
-- Separate electric metering of office and residential
tenants.
-- Use of natural light and fluorescent task lighting.
-- Hot water temperatures set at or below 900F, except
where otherwise specified by health codes.
-- Central energy management system in the office tower
that will provide start/stop optimization, time of day
scheduling, electric demand limiting, night temperature
setback/setup, programmed maintenance, and building
lighting control.
Page 5 of 21
EMIBIT "A"
55--''l3t
T I
-- Air distribution using a variable air volume system.
-- Insulated glass that is tinted or solar reflective.
-- Airlock doors at major project entrances.
-- Light -reflecting and/or light colored wall and roof
surfaces, with solar absorption coefficients less than
or equal to 0.50.
-- Bicycle racks and storage areas for project employees.
-- Lavatory water flow of 0.8 gallons per minute or less,
water closets that use no more than three and one half
gallons per flush, and flow restricting shower heads.
-- Reduction of cooled space by thermally isolating non-
critical areas, such as closets and other storage areas.
-- High efficiency air conditioning systems with minimum
EER rating of 10.0 in the office tower and 9.5 in
residential areas.
-- Measures that effectively yield, in the cooling mode,
R-11 in walls and R-19 in ceilings.
-- Non -electric energy sources for space heating, cooking,
and water heating, if feasible.
-- Solar water heaters in townhouse units, as feasible.
-- Computerized elevator control system (Otis Elevonic or
equivalent).
14. Construct all roadway and intersection improvements
identified in Table 1 and dedicate the improvements to the
City, prior to issuance of final certificates of occupancy
for more than 200,000 gross square feet of development on -
site.
15. Deposit $60,000 in an interest -bearing escrow account as
partial construction funding for the County -programmed
4-laning of NW 27th Avenue from US 1 to South Bayshore
Drive, prior to issuance of certificates of occupancy for
more than 200,000 square feet of final gross floor area on -
site. Such funds will be released to the County at any time
upon request. The Applicant will annually notify the County
Public Works Department of the availability of these funds
until such time as the County expends these funds. A copy
of this notification will be included in the annual report
required by Condition 20 herein.
Page 6 of 21
85-'73
EX..IIBIT "A"
TABLE 1
APPLICANT'S RECOMMENDED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
Cost
Year
Location
Improvement
1984 dollars
1987
Aviation Avenue from
3 lanes, middle
$100,000
S. Bayshore Drive to
lane for left turns
Tigertail Avenue
(Figure 1)
1987
SW 27th Avenue/Tiger-
NB, SB thru lanes
70,000
tail Avenue
NB left -turn lane
WB right -turn lane
(Figure 2)
1987
Aviation Avenue/
EB left -turn lane
45,000
Tigertail Avenue
on Tigertail
WB left -turn lane
on Tigertail to
Aviation Avenue
(Figure 1)
WB left -turn lane
on Tigertail to
Terremark drive-in
bank entrance
1987
Aviation Avenue/S.
NB left -turn lane
159000
Bayshore Drive
on Bayshore
(Figure 1 )
Sub -Total
Page 7 of 21
E)LRIBIT "A"
$230,000
85-73-
FIGURE 1
AVIATION AVF- AND NMSEDTION PAPROVENENTS
i
d
I�G \
PROPOSED
SOURCE: ADA
j
Page 8 of 21
85--173,
EXHIBIT "A"
4t
SOURCE: ADA
F l ouat 2
RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS:
SW 27TH AVENUE/TIGERTAIL AVENUE
i
Tampa
s
EXISTING
--i
_ � I
I>>r
w i
PROPOSED
Pave 9 of 21
55--'73
EXHIBIT "A"
�f
i
16. After final certificates of occupancy are issued for more
than 200,000 gross square feet of building space, provide
shuttle service each weekday using a minimum of two vans or
buses to and from the Coconut Grove Metrorail station at
10-minute or less intervals from 7:00 to 10:00 am and from
3:30 to 6:30 pm, and at 30-minute or less intervals from
10:00 am to 3:30 pm (off-peak).
17. Work with the City to prepare a Minority Participation and
Employment Plan to be submitted within ninety (90) days of
the issuance of the Development Order.
18. Work with the City to develop a Minority
Contractors/Subcontractors Participation Plan to be
submitted within ninety (90) days of the issuance of this
Development Order.
19. Consolidate all original and supplemental ADA information
into a revised Application for Development Approval (ADA),
and submit three copies of the document to the Council and
one copy to the City and the Florida Department of Community
Affairs within ninety (90) days of the effective date of
this Development Order.
20. Prepare and submit a monitoring report, twelve (12) months
from the date of issuance of this Development Order and each
twelve (12) months thereafter until a final Certificate of
Occupancy is issued; to the South Florida Regional Planning
Council; the State of Florida Department of Community
Affairs, Division of Local Resource Management; all affected
permitting agencies and the Planning Director, City of Miami
Planning Department. This report shall contain, for the
preceding twelve (12) months.
-- A general description of construction progress in terms
of construction dollars and employment compared to the
schedule in the applicant's Application for Development
Approval.
-- A cumulative list of all permits or approvals applied
for, approved or denied.
-- A statement as to whether any proposed project
construction changes in the ensuing twelve (12) months
j are expected to deviate substantially from the approvals
�! included in this Development Order.
-- Any additional responses required by rules adopted by
the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs and
any other information required by Section
380.06(14)(c)(3) F. S.
Page 10 of 21
EXHIBIT "A"
85-'i3
8 ow731.
Further, throughout project operation, and unless and until
Rule 17-31, Florida Administrative Code, is repealed or
otherwise declared null and void, the annual monitoring
report shall include the following information:
-- Identification of all tenants that meet the criteria
established in Tables 4 and 5 of the Council DRI
Assessment, as may be amended pursuant to Condition 5
herein.
-- For each such tenant, copies of one of the following
types of documentation of appropriate hazardous waste
disposal:
- a hazardous waste manifest,
- a bill of lading from a transporter indicating
shipment to a permitted hazardous waste management
facility, or
't
a confirmation of receipt of material from a recycler
of a waste exchange operation.
-- Description of any incidents or spills of hazardous
materials, including but not limited to those in Table
5, as it may be amended; and specification of the
actions taken to clean up and dispose of the spilled
material.
The Planning Director, City of Miami Planning Department, or
a project director to be named later, is hereby designated
to receive this report, and to monitor and assure compliance
with this Development Order.
21. Give notice to Richard P. Brinker, Clerk, Dade County
Circuit Court, 73 West Flagler Street, Miami, Florida,
33130, for recording in the Official Records of Dade County,
Florida, as follows:
a) That the City Commission of the City of Miami, Florida,
has issued a Development Order for the Terremark Centre
Project, a Development of Regional Impact located at
approximately 2560-2580 Tigertail; approximately 3204-
3240 Aviation Avenue; and approximately 2583-2585 South
-} Bayshore Drive, being
i Lot 1 less right-of-way; lots 2-4, 7-31 and.
unnumbered lot also known as Lot 32, Block 39 NEW
{ BISCAYNE AMENDED (B-16).
ALL OF THE FOREGOING SUBJECT TO any dedications,
limitations, restrictions, reservations or
easement of record.
Page 11 of 21
85-'73°
EXHIBIT "A"
b) That Grove Bay Plaza, Limited, is the developer with
offices at 2600 SW 3rd Avenue, Miami, Florida, 33129.
c) That the Development Order with any modifications may be
examined in the City Clerk's Offices, 3500 Pan American
Drive, Dinner key, Miami, Florida, 33133.
d) That the Development Order constitutes a land
development regulation applicable to the property; that
the conditions contained in this Development Order shall
run with the land and bind all successors in interest;
it being understood that recording of this notice shall
not constitute a lien, cloud or encumbrance on real
property, nor actual nor constructive notice of any of
the same.
THE CITY WILL:
22. Withhold issuance of final certificates of occupancy for
more than 200,000 gross square feet of development on -site
until the Applicant has complied with Conditions 14 and 15.
23. Stay the effectiveness of the Development Order and no
development permits thereunder shall be granted, until such
time as an Amended ADA, providing updated information, is
submitted to the Council, City, and State and an Amended
Development Order issued, if Conditions 1 through 19 have
not been complied with within four years from the effective
date of the Development Order. Should the Development Order
be stayed pursuant to this condition, nothing herein shall
be construed to limit Condition 21 below that this
Development Order runs with the land, and its terms and
conditions are binding on the Applicant, its successors,
and/or assigns.
24. Enter into, within one year of the date of issuance of the
--� development order, a fair -share agreement with the Applicant
to contribute to necessary improvements in fire service for
the project.
25. Consult with the Applicant to ensure incorporation of
security measures and systems into the design and operation
of the project, including provision for emergency helicopter
_-- ! evacuation from the roof of the office tower.
General
26. The Application for Development Approval is incorporated
herein by reference and is relied upon by the parties. in
discharging their statutory duties under Chapter 380,
Florida Statutes. Substantial compliance with the
representations contained in the Application for Development
Page 12 of 21 853
EXIRIBIT "A"
85707- t
,
l Approval is a condition for approval unless waived or
modified by agreement among the Council, City and Applicant,
its successors and/or assigns.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Terremark Centre Project, proposed by Grove Bay Plaza
Limited, complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan,
is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City
of Miami, and complies with local land development regulations
being Zoning Ordinance No. 9500; and
The proposed development does not unreasonably interfere with the
achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land
Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami; and
The proposed development is generally consistent with the Report
and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning
Council and does not unreasonably interfere with any of the
considerations and objectives set forth in Chapter 380, Florida
Statutes.
1
Page 13 of 21
85-'73
EXHIBIT "A"
Q5 3�`
T. I
! Approval is a condition for approval unless waived or
i` modified by agreement among the Council, City and Applicant,
its successors and/or assigns.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Terremark Centre Project, proposed by Grove Bay Plaza
Limited, complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan,
is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City
of Miami, and complies with local land development regulations
being Zoning Ordinance No. 9500; and
The proposed development does not unreasonably interfere with the
achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land
Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami; and
The proposed development is generally consistent with the Report
and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning
Council and does not unreasonably interfere with any of the
4A considerations and objectives set forth in Chapter 380, Florida
Statutes.
i
1"WO ADOMXYt Mlflbt
V
1 I
! [
,
• I t -
t —
t
}{
I
4. 6— -t J t
_� --
S-'
♦'
Z
! t R
S
C\ ------ , r
r—
,Ms.. WA Y�1. _-�-� 8S-[73
v ~ N-11 H-2 Page 14 of 21
EXHIBIT "A"
85-'73 ,
z
I
r
�i
W
CA
1
n,
RECREATIONAL LEVEL -PARKING ROOF DECK
M>
ti7
w EAST ELEVATION
as
m
0
M
W
N
W
rM
A"
rm
b
w
M
m
J
O
N
N
Lo
WEST ELEVATION
i ulil�
l IIIVV�I�
1�
H
H
e
,-
m
S
w
W
oa
m
0
N
w
I LA
nnnn►
,1 nnnnn;
::;nannnn
:: �nnnnnnn
. �nnnnnnnn
nnnnnnnn I
� � � nnnnnnnnnnn
I nnnnnnnnnnnnl '.
��nnnnnnnnnnnnn:
Innnnnnnnnnnnn!
NORTH ELEVATION
Want II o:
rmr�r��aaaa
IAD11 IIdIIdII
l]CllD _QaDaO•
Ml
rG
I
ifMYiiiYNM�v�a's�-:r.+�aua:...u.r...... _..._.. _ _. - _ —.-�+•—�r�- "-SIT.gM1:'GF+ '
Z
t1i
x
x
w
i
1-3
m
I
ry
oa
I
o
N
CA
4
W
SOUTH ELEVATION
L�h�r
El
1 II IrI ii�� �Ir� it
min
711, irr1,'tn
nnnnnnnn t i
nnnnnnnnn + � � I
-lnnnnnnnn.1
I' -lnnnnnnnnnn�l
nnnnnnnnnnn�
��nnnnnnnnnnnn
,-lnnnnnnnnnn�nr
nnnnnnnnn-tnnn�
** IN
i rLj 1w
im
Tl
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
O
0
ro
-4
FOURTH FLOOR PLAN
i 'Ell im
lmk Pl�l
Ili P,
nn X
I '-, I
THIRD FLOOR PLAN Li -Li K
TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN (5-14)
V
i u I I.�IY iillVi�I�YY�II�
I
r
-- -
I t
It�
I
I
I ;
I
I
BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN
I,IIII� I '
�III. I`II�J III�II I II�II j
Ili�ilillilllllll�� ���',Iill
.. •tom• ti'7''i'S
• �f +.r... , •��.�� iA- • )+J - .).... � 4Y' .. . .� � � r_ •+iLl.i.�=. y` «.♦:. Epp:
.. � • .. F••.• • - .mow _ •-. .. � � •. •�.. � .'..M�.�:f... •alb•.. �•�. .. �Y� S.
�^ — •. ...'.t..s.a:►fiY.7�ia-.f.M?H:h:•I,-�J�L!�'t a�li!A'�',Ir. �*wit="�rb.'bt =��'~, .M+rJ1A[�+r.__.+'1. . i.' .�:,i..: -.. _. _: r.ra-. .,R'... ;jY'�Z.�•.. ..
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOTS 7. a. 9, 10, 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17, IB. 19. 20. 21 AND 22, AND THE UNNUMBERED LOT LYING
SOUTHEASTERLY OF THE SAID LOT 7 (ALSO KNOWN AS LOT 32). ALL BEING IN BLOCK 39. OF THE AMCNOEO PLAT
OF NEW BISCAYNE. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF. AS RECFADED IN PLAT BOOK "r', AT PAGE 16 OF THE
PUBLIC RECORDS Of DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
AND
LOT 1. LESS A TRIANGULAR STRIP OF LAND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NE CORNER OF SAID
LOT 1. BLOCK 39, RUNNING THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF TIGERTRAIL AVENUE. ALSO KNOWN
AS TIGERTAIL AVENUE, 40 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, RUNNING THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH
SIDE OF TIGERTRAIL AVENUE, ALSO KNOWN AS TIGERTAIL AVENUE, 40 FEET TO THE CORNER Of TIGERTRAIL
AVENUE. ALSO KNOWN AS TIGERTAIL AVENUE AND TRADE STREET, THENCE RUNNING SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE
WESTERLY SIDE Of TRADE STREET N FEET, THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND ALL OF
LOTS 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 20, 29. 30 AND 31, BLOCK 39. OF NEW BISCAYNE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK "B'•, AT PAGE 16 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS Of DADE COUNTY. FLORIDA.
411
,y ......, - �, ..r.rt w - v'• �^- �.1-. ti: A'+%. _. . .- _ ... ..rr,:., g .';fir � . ar '�,,�.
�•• - .. .... !•��t./.M rs�':►�MYH::iMY �:'�L':.. ayfM4itYwy/'.•A'�;;(-",'+.i.,7".w-.; 7r t-:•',,;e"'f 4�rh�� �•.� _ ��i�-.. �. :ti... '...K!-�::'y,'Y fir• .. ..
.—Air
Air
low
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOTS 7. S, 9. 10, 11, 12. 13. 14, 15. 16. 17. IS, 19. 20. 21 AND 22. AND THE UNNUMBEREO LOT LYING
SOUTHEASTERLY OF THE SAID LOT 7 (ALSO KNOWN AS LOT 32). All BEING IN BLOCK 39, OF THE AMENDED PLAT
OF NEW BISCAYNE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF. AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 0010'. AT PAGE 16 OF THE
PUBLIC RECORDS OF CADE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
AND
LOT 1. LESS A TRIANGULAR STRIP OF LAND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NE CORNER OF SAID
LOT 1, BLOCK 39, RUNNING THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF TIGERTRAIL AVENUE, ALSO KNOWN
AS TIGERTAIL AVENUE, 40 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. RUNNING THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH
SIDE OF TIGERTRAIL AVENUE, ALSO KNOWN AS TIGERTAIL AVENUE. 40 FEET TO THE CORNER OF TIGERTRAIL
AVENUE. ALSO KNOWN AS TIGERTAIL AVENUE AND TRADE STREET, THENCE RUNNING SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE
WESTERLY SIDE OF TRADE STREET 71 FEET. THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND All OF
LOTS 23, 24, 25. 26, 27. 25. 29. 30 AND 31, BLOCK 39. OF NEW BISCAYNE. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK "B", AT PACE 16 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY. FLORIDA.
!liMl/Y-tM! • _ . _ ..r .. ...,a I ate.• .. ..
.,Nlf Syr• .t :.... �_.. � vsn..i11���. �•�il.,
.. - r'•'i'•"• ~r. ,t•!,.0 ' i•+r•wdi4.ytL'Y\ 7'-44J.ri.;�.
. .. _ .. �r �.: �'. w' •.:; t ':R'i�s�•F'1/�0. �"i'J•��.MY"'�y'i.'�"� � 7^.?T "I•`..� •. ••L+
• � a. .. ... _ ... . �. .. ....'.r:��i.•.t'..t4..'r^:v::M..-e:lYsi NG'L,;�L'.'ii�>:.r•_. t�+tir'...:....-... �t'!:����5.! �•ruM'.'��.F••`:. .. .�'i. s
TERREMARK AT BAYSHORE, INC.
^ Owned 100% by Terremark Investment Services, Inc.
which is owned 100% by:
i
Manuel D. Medina
2600 S.W. Third Avenue
Miami, Florida 33129
i
i
A.T.S. (CURACAO), N.V.
! Owned 100% by Mr. Francis Lee Nyet Khiong, as Trustee
(trust is a grantor trust with full power of appointment)
c/o Joel Karp
3050 AmeriFirst Building
One S.E. Third Avenue
Miami, Florida 33131
EXHIBIT "B"
i
` s
F i
f
1
1 �
i
i
j
CITY OF MIAM1. FLORIDA
33 $ INTER -OFFICE *AEMORANDUM
1
-� Randolph B. Rosencrantz^TE January 10, 1985 FILE:
Ci anager I SUSPECT: RESOLUTION - TERREMARK CENTRE
APPROX 2560-2580 TIGERTAIL AVE
APPROX 3204-3240 AVIATION AVE b
Au - REFERENCES: APPROX 2583-2585 S BAYSHORE DR
FROM. Di rector
Planningand Zoning Boards COMMISSION AGENDA - JANUARY 24, 1985
9 ENCLOSURES:
Administration Department PLANNING AND ZONING ITEMS
It is recommended by the Planning
Department that the Final Application
for Major Use Special Permit for the
Terremark Centre Project located at
approximately 2560-2580 Ti ertaii
Avenue, approximately -
AF-al%n Avenue and approx ma e y
7 -So-RE Ba shore Drive be
approved.
The Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of January 16, 1985, Item 3,
following an advertised hearing, will consider a) the Final Application for
Major Use Special Permit for the Terremark Centre Project located at
approximately 2560-2580 Tigertail Avenue, approximately 3204-3240 Aviation
Avenue and approximately 2583-2585 South Bayshore Drive, also described as Lot
1 less right-of-way; Lots 2-4, 7-31 and an unnumbered lot also known as Lot
32, Block 39, NEW BISCAYNE AMD (B-16); b) consideration of drive-in tellers as
a Special Exception and c) authorization to subsequently issue a Class C
Special Permit, all as per Zoning Ordinance 9600, as amended. The
recommendations of the Planning Advisory Board will be presented at the City
Commission meeting of January 24, 1985.
Backup information is included for your review.
A RESOLUTION to provide for the above has been prepared by the City Attorney's
Office and submitted for consideration of the City Commission.
AEPL:111
cc: Law Department
NOTE: Planning Department recommends: APPROVAL
853I
`,'ie
„��
'=• i _ r=,,y,•rq,:.l+r,.y„:y,., •Yl..•a ' .... . .. _ � •.. •. . '1:..••:•�w•.•{...,. .L_
L' ray _ . _ .. .. . .
i
.. .- � � �' ,"- •
,
•.._.�-�-�
�
�'.,!
e i
� S
.r •�: __ _ -_ '- ... �' `. :-
��,,.'fMrtr..V ..`i•�wWa�1a,,r ""''�•
• . y-+u„�'r7.i71:.:;�"+.: itii%. ra��",w�kjiF+�l1Q:r '�ti 'i.n4i�.w..y; .! ••I�.J<:.r3 r:JL .tii.:�•„' �_"'•. — ... .. ... -.. •.... z,•�•
f
•
,
.�..."+ . '��4 �}. "r. ...+r. �i+ •ii+.
= �` . `L sc.•..i...�c..�-aYisi. y,.'►tii...�1'Y�'�n .Yri�':
!fY'!;
_y'!Lr�Y"-"'!:ivPLtl�St�70�cR!C�=�:.L11�r'.2'aL'."wi�':...`Cf7�.C.1 .'...s.r-.-..r.:t..�.....r•.ir�:�ia�ii�iY.T�
� • '
fi r
z.;., .
PLANNING FACT SHEET
APPLICANT
Grove Bay Plata Ltd. (Gary Held)
June 25, 1984
2560-2580 TIGERTAIL AVENUE;
PETITION
3. APPROXIMATELY -
E DRIVE
�vr '
Lot I less right-of-way;
Lots 2-4, 1-31 and
Unnumbered lot also known as Lot 32
Block 39
NEW BISCAYNE AMENDED (8-16)
Consideration of recommendations concerning a
-
Development Order for the Terremark Centre
project, a Development of Regional Impact per
Chapter 380 F.S., also including a) issuance of
a Major Use Special Permit; b) consideration of
drive-in tellers as a special exception and c)
_-
authorization to subsequently issue a Class C
Special Permit all as per Zoning Ordinance 9500
<A
as amended. _
REQUEST
To make recommendations on a Major Use Special
Permit and a Development Order for a Development
of Regional Impact.
BACKGROUND
Zoning Ordinance 9500 establishes a Major Use
Special Permit process (Article 28) whereby
-
defined major uses require recommendation by the
Planning Advisory Board and consideration and
authorization by the City Commission (both
-
preliminary and final) before construction can -
=_
be undertaken. This process encompasses
Developments of Regional Impact and other
projects (as the Major Use Special Permit
-
threshold is lower). It is the intent of the
-
Major Use Special Permit to include, in one
action, any changes in the comprehensive plan,
_
zoning district classifications, other zoning
actions, and other City ordinances that would be
necessary for a building permit application to
be consi dered.
PAB 1/16/85
Item #3
Page 1
85- 73
>
f+� its. _ _�.. i«a Vli :A�?+.�•t: R Ir +r�s«e•...i^.. _.►'�wr!MrR'.L "_�!S_ � ._.. � .�: �.. •.-�.:1�2-rL `• 1Jk Jai• � j +•+=l�I 'N^�•7i:Mar.•.
4w
._" -
x
_..__ .. -. _•:"'T:_' w ...rr.... �. `"��•" .- �.'' � �� r"w'+t'•'ib►.•` s.ray� � A sY,`-�!• •.L.
.:.i•+u.�wJiit y:y'.i.�yt�!wli.+� y ^.r: r��:.M1 .-.+.r�. `li.+.'w f"wr-i'f'M1ti `.. y✓ 11 ••yr':'•.h
_ `
(.�' r a
.._
_ .� . - _.�.. l+wy � •L - _ �. - .. �� ►�:' r -•L f.. -�•.• rp nJti.':+i � � . � � �.�•t .. /•.: r •�:�'.
{ " -
_gig- 3 >y L. •r �j. a
i�ii�'`•7M�Jii'N�.
...:J►^.'tii. k 'r"aµ ..
.. ..
..Y•sM"'re�„•�M►t�/+1�..��!'•
'
1 -•L _ .. ._ •�y� . Ky•.s...v,a�.•Lr. 'a .: �: - .+Yf?►.:.. ..•. •...... � fir. -' :• : ..a Y..'irw." � z arrk:.-S:•« _..`wtl _. r_+' Lr:
. .1 •• _--`.y��,J,� A{J�,rj.2. •:"J'.1MJ.�.t �i..w.2 .�.�. ;•/1!IY•an: :r.':..i74� tllA.'o^ � Iry
a
1
The sequence of events to this point isms
follows:
Meeting/Hearing
Planning Advisory Board Public
ee ing - Kesolution -84 -
review and recommendation
of the Preliminary
Application for Major Use
Special Permit.
City Commission Resolution 84-903
(not a public nearing) -
Granting Permission to file a
Final Application for Major Use
Special Permit; set October 25
1984, as date for hearing on
Final Application.
July 18, 1984
July 31, 1984
City Commission Resolution 84-904 July 31, 1984
Establishing a public hearing
date of October 25, 1984 for a
Development of Regional Impact
Hearing.
City Commission Motion 84-1210
Oct. 25, 1984
continuing pu is hearing to
November 15, 1984.
City Commission Resolution
Nov. 15, 1984
K84-Mbcon nuing public
hearing to January 24, 1984.
ANALYSIS The project proposes:
Element Floor
Area (S.F.)
Office (18 stories)
314,000
Retail (ground level)
81,000
Residential (16 du's)
199200
Parking (1050 spaces)
333,300
Recreation
50,400
Total
724,900
RECOMMENDATIONS
PLANNING DEPT. Approval.
PAS 1/16/85
Item #3
Page 2
85-'73
3
94,
17
100,
41,
A
PAB January 16, 1985 AS 45
Bounded by Tigertail Ave., Aviation Avil
South Bayshore Drive and the Naval
Reserve (Terremark Center)
85-73 - AP K-25
T.n a
r..
r 4 I
k.. h
RM
i
VA; C
r ;
I
PROPOSED ZONING
- revised R0-3t6 and
application of SPI-17 Overl
try - removal of SPI-3 Overaly
- from RG-2/5 to RO-3/6
Removal of SPI -3 Overla
. Pr000se
EXISTING
t isirl
n
t
ZONING
PAB January 2, 1985 AS-45 & 46
South Bayshore Drive Study
•
yi
'�w
�� � Voiuuu I�dlil�
m
C.n
A
PROPOSED
,Proposed SPI - 17 Overlay
fro
LINC I%ff %'f -ft
CLI N C
-LIA
ZONING
PAB j4quary 2, 1985 AS-45 & 46
South Bayshore Drive Study
m
N
W
TEO O
' pia... .. ',... _.
...,.� ..... , mill ..,.. e _ _ - n+aze-�•�-:a.� � _ �—......�..-.
T
1'
Proposed SPI -17 Overlay
LIN60LN • LINCO N
r L.� � �' �r w. ,r.r•.,•.. ar.ri` '•�""�'r....+ � �'� v� T tG E R T � 1 L�
� 1 1
1
• a i �� 1
1
• ,�
Q P d RS !.t/1 '
i
� � Y
WI
ZONING
PROPOSED
PA8 J_ anuary 2. 1985 AS-45 6 46
11 •.�
Drive Study
- South 6ayshore ; • 4. -:�• , : .�s
MAP
II
..�M'!.}�f!!�,!lf�:ptj_1L1(�GY'ic;M.
_«,.r...-. �_.j'�' 'J.•. a: �ra.� :•�jw.�•
:f: r�••.ti•� y�t.y
L•.• c J
ij•r�..i ut:'•X.•1..
..ri.riwt:
....
... .. _
.y..;:
_,,,..!.
•`
_�.,... it Y�•'� ,r....._
..'_��. ` r .. ,,we.... tt«.4ML Law y1 •��..
'-•I, '^
.• •.
1.
a
w tWl!►tiF: 111• l'a
� x •� .l.
'1+
L K♦
•'1 �iw:
�.. .. _
ii} . isi:.Y• :ram ..
A•I .•.u:.r ..t w . .�.: .r �� f•Y..aa
V �' w.r .y.
..
.,�'••..•.vW. •�' • ��t�r�.��� _"���'f.� _ _: �ras' M— .w1•• : •• .7. „•�;,Vn:�, .:7t�
_ .•i.:p.,' . �: ,.^t�rrf�._�,.
_
�2».i.� � •i��'y:?�•
�..r.�y
�4e. 1WIy�•',iMt•..r.��� r .MyV �Ir��\i.�,���i.I.i��,�.SiiW ���
,�..
'•
.:y �• ., Wa _�i��ff.�+/!,.r�I•..�W
:•
'
_ w •n.
.r _ i '.' ��,.~/[�tat �' r�Y1Y• yt�ipY!.Y•an
�fli�`��.
..
.
J.�•�t. _ ten. t•I�
1. _ �'S .l.. .'
.... .... .�:.wS.at7�.i..:.•r.,.:.- "A:��. �C:: `3L.'s.
..a �................ �:.+a._r r...:. r.'w,r.: .:.,q n_._y.,y;r_ ., r•-;,Lr ..,..
.0 ..a ..., ...• ... .»..w•.
•
APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT
.
File Number MU484
It is intended that major use special permits be required where specified uses and/or
occupancies involve matters deemed to be of city-wide or area -wide importance.
The City Commission shall be solely responsible for determinations an applications
for major use.special permits. (See Article 28J
The City Commission shall refer all applications for major use special permits to the
Planning Advisory_ Board and to the director of the Department of planning for
recommendations, and may make referrals to other agencies, bodies, or officers,
either through the Department of PIanning or directly, for review, analysis, and/or
technical findings and determinations and reports thereon. (Section 2301.5.)
I� Gary M. Held hereby apply to the Director of Plan-
ning of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions
of Article 28 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance.
X Address of Property 2583-2585 South Bayshore Drive & 3204 Aviation Ave.
X Nature of Proposed Use (Be specific) A mixed use development named
Terremark Centre constituting 241,900 sq. ft. office; 12,850
sq. ft. retail; 95 residential tower units (185,250 sq. ft.),
333,300 sq. ft. parking garage (1,052 cars), 50,400 sq. ft.
recreation, and 16 townhouse units (19,200 sq. ft.) per plans
and the Application for Development Approval submitted with this
Preliminary Application application.
4
I attach the following in support or explanation of the Preliminary, Application:
X 1. Two copies of a survey of the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered
Land Surveyor.
2. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of
Interest form (Forms 4-83 and 4a-83,-attach tar application).
1 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375 foot radius from the outside
boundaries of property covered by this application (Form 6-83, attach to applica-
tion).
'i Page I of 3
Form I6-83 Revised
... ss--7a
' � ��.3 - _ � .. � _ .. . .. .. : r .: Ham. y,f.•...: :.�.� _.. .•+S « + r.
U.
�- rs� (
! ..: I\.
r�v'�•y:yy R
r • ,�. •r .. .. ..w �� . _�`!`—:. ,.w. .Ti.ii 5�i.�M.iyyM..gry.��C.j_'.'�T__—
� ��•,�����•,.iywr�•yy'•.����A
r `
• '.
.. ..^ram. ✓•^ _ .MFi.• •". � �. a�.Y�• J•1`�.•
CS:A
•' • • N.'..7.IrATiY
•'
1
.. • ...
_• ... .. itr .�.. •.. •ai'W.�. •.... f•.•t«.r•..•.�-+.wrs�MiY:sY";i.... -.
^ •
,
4.
Maps of: (a) existing zoning and (b) adopted comprehensive plan designations for
the area on and around the property covered by this application.
_x „ S.
General location mop, showing relation fo the site or activity to major streets,
schools' existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and
adjoining the project, and• the like..
6.
Concept Plan
`_
(a) Site Plan and relevant information. Sections 510.2.3 (a through h) and
2304.2.1 (d through h).
r `
x_
(b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed future uses, activities, ••
facilities.
systems and Section 2802.3.2(a).
.'.
;.
(c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan
principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special
permits, change of zoning, or exemptions. Section 2802.3.2(b).
_ 7.
Developmental Impact Study (art application for Development approval for a
Development of Regional Impact may substitute). ;
` 8.
Other (Be gwf f ic)
9. Fee of $ . based on the following:
(a) $.01 per sq.ft. of building(s). Additional fees for any required special permits
changes of zoning, or variances shall be in accord with zoning fees as listed in
Section 62-61 of the City Code.
(b) Fee tabulation
Building(s) Office 241,900 sq. ft.
Other (Specify)Residential ..204, 45Yf sq. ft..-
Retail 12,850 sq. ft.
Parking 333, 300. sq. ft.
Recreation 50,40'0 sq. ft.
Tota1842, 900 x .01 s $8, 429.00
Page 2 of 3
Form 16.0
85--73
:T �" • .. _.• '-tv.«...;./.• • rr. �..�.. -4- 7u l:^ .• . ••....� •... l.H�.•. �.. _«1-'�'.�. •q • •.�..5:< "`i:I::+•'.; •.
&0
Final Application
I attach the following additional information in support or explanation of the final
application:
•
Signature
f'-.= m Held Address3
MUM -.1 M.
City, State, Zip Miami, Florida 33131 Phone 579-0583
This application is approved denied
in accord with City Commission Resolution No.
other
Sergio Rodriguez, Director
Planning Department
Date
Form 1 &413
Page 3 of 3
85--73
E
CT • Liw 0A
W
1 •
�.•C. �. • W•� .rwr♦ ��.. .YZ: b..v• ter) , 1.14.i W7 rr. wWar.r�l
GARY M. HELD who bei by r r.. tt d•.:ly T:4or...
upca exth, decospai and `-Is:
1. That he is the c.:Mer. or the legal pre:entati•: e of ;.he
o�:ner. st itti+'y the acc :rzy~i:.; application for a ubl.ic hama.::j as
rec— red by 0.-d:,=a ics No. 9 5.0 0 of the Co' a of the City of Floni•da,
effec:izr the real proper located' in the City of Ma}r.i• as desa: _bed a-d
1 ted C:1 the Dales ati Q- .ed to• tlli5 affidavit Gard c-a :e a r?t thergoi .
Z. Tmz all mmarrs ti.4hich he rep. -a.serms.. if 2=/, rave given their
f>� and c=lete re.=-ssioa for rim to act in their b&.z, r for the
0w .r.�i1 . r L.•rS 1 •�e� S r• r=w.� r .1 ri q ...,{ `Or r in
r YA Sri i.�a.r�Cr.: of a C•I.r�.i.��Ccr r '1 0• ♦ ��1r.� 1r W of Z,I �.� r-- r V1rr.
3• 1.a1rt afames arwac hers lro a a a cf,pis
• !
; .. t"Ame ,—Mrt nL as• rr ' 1 ; ..c .Lr.esse � ��•,e .�,� are
• Giwi..�i. .• CW�bC . 1r1: �.•� • .. �iw�, ••..'�7 a�rr .7, �..v.� ..i•.r�..7 Z�
e = : r: ., to real .,�..wsw�. %4.. c:z he is he a.--mer Or lei 1
1e CSC _, r.•C.3 • C: t. e_ 1......•....f ..� _ '
4. Tns :��� rer-rwa.*:...A _z she
w,* ted ii-i ...d th this a i ida-vit are b—.ba a::d c.0 ec—. .
Funh »_ Afr• - sr..reth rct
GARY M. HELD .
to a.r.- VL:w-r _:e1 before me
this 20th day of • July 98. 4 .
Niouz-1 FL`:ruc, State Of at_L= da
NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA
BONDED THRU GENERAL INSURANCE LIND •
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY 16 1986
85-731 - '(
i
0:INE.R'S LIST - :t
Owner's dame GROVE BAY PLAZA, LTD.
Mailing Address c/o Robert H. Traurig, Escr, 1401 Brickell Ave.
Telephone Number 579-0700
Legal Description:
See attached Exhibit "A"
Owner's Name
Mailing Address
Telephone Number
Legal Description:
Owner's Name '
Flailing Address
Telephone Number
Legal Description:
Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally
(by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375' of the subject
site is listed as follows:
Street Address Legal Description
Street Address
Street Address
Legal Description
Legal Description
85-0 73
�■r
t"
.�t.:�.:ir;.7: sa:.�. . ���� a. . :trM.i;. ... Y�' �S.' � ♦. j'G. �.•i .':�S•T �.. •!.'• .. _ -"womA.4 -mol moo
�'.
. ,"n7 ;t•;.. �:. �. ., :.•....� ...�'-•- ;'. _ :.ems•
'�-"`1".�:�.i`a.iJ�l•..�:+i«r:..�`:.ti"�`i:r:.::��i,7af"+r�"�i`..:�.:�'�f'y':..`.'-".:`..iai:.Y'� !ti::t::�C7!�.�: c3.:.1+G�0.� �- t.� � ..
':'d�71y1tii°r ��:.-�ia�ef/s.�.•r`�.r:ri:v��l�tirti:i� 'Lc �t
•w!"iiLw�••�:�.1��''a"'.sl`i.�•�r.�a.�T'L+"r':�..�..`:.s���' ..•. " .. _
t
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOTS 7. 8. 9, 10. 11. 12, 13. 14. 15. 16. 17, 18, 19. 20. 21 AMC 22. AND THE UNNURBERED LOT LY1M6
SOUTHEASTERLY OF THE SAID LOT 7 (ALSO KNOWN AS LOT 32). ALL BEING IN BLOCK 39. OF THE (WENDED PLAT
OF NEW BISCAYNE. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF. AS RECOROED IN PLAT BOOK "Iff. AT PACE 16 OF THE
PUBLIC RECORDS OF CADE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
AND
LOT 1, LESS A TRIANGULAR STRIP OF LAND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NE CORNER OF SAID
LOT 1. BLOCK 39, RUNNING THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF TIGERTRAIL AVENUE, ALSO KNOWN
AS TICERTAIL AVENUE. 40 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, RUNNING THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH
SIDE OF TIGERTRAIL AVENUE. ALSO KNOWN. AS TIGERTAIL AVENUE. 40 FEET TO THE CORNER OF TICERTRAIL
AVENUE, ALSO KNOWN AS TIGERTAIL AVENUE AND TRADE STREET, THENCE RUNNING SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE
WESTERLY SIDE OF TRADE STREET 71 FEET, THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND ALL OF
LOTS 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28. 29, 30 AND 31. BLOCK 39. OF NEW BISCAYNE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK "B", AT PAGE 16 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF CADE COUNTY. FLORIDA.
AND
LOTS 2. 3 AND 4. IN BLOCK 39 OF AMENDED PLAT OF NEW BISCAYNE. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK B AT PACE 16 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF'DADE COUNTY. FLORIDA.
144 683 72 Sq. FT. s 3 3?. ACRES s NET AREA
EXHIBIT "A"
85-01731 13
ss
.K-
1. Legal description and street address of subject real property. -
See attached Exhibit "A"
South Bayshore Drive at Aviation Avenue
-
2. Owner(s) of su!7;4et real Pro". and -percentage of ownership.
Note: City of Miami Ordinance No. 9419 requires disclosure of all parties
having a financial interest,, either direct or indirect, in the subject
matter of a presentation,, request or petition to the City Commission.
Accordingly, question 12 requires disclosure of all sharehold6rs of
corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties
together with their addresses and proportionate interest.
owner: Grove*Bay Plaza, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership
General Partner: Terremark at Bayshorer Inc. (20%)
Limited Partner: A.T.H. (Curacao),N.V. (80%)
All c/o Robert H. Traurig
1401 Brickell Ave
Miami, Florida 33131
See attached Exhibit "B" for beneficial ownerships
3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a)
owned by any party listedin answer to question 42p and (b)-located within
375 feet of the subject real property.
none
.1
STATE OF FLORIDA SS:
CCC44M OF DADE
A.
GABZ M RETID being duly sworn, deposes and
says that ne is the (;;=--x)(Attorney ME Owner) of the real property
described in answer to question 41, above; that he has read the foregoing
answers and that the same are true and c=plete; and (if acting as attorney
for owner) that he has authority to execute this Disclosure of Ownership
form on behalf of the owner.
'�kflame)
SIXR; TO PM SUb5CEI8ED
before me this 20th
day of July'"" ,,S 4.
Mtar.v Public, State ot
Florida at Large
JONDED THRU GENERAL INSURANCE UND - 85---73..
my CC.'.%.'AI C.SI 004, D F'17ES JULY 16 1986