HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-85-0072VA
117
RE.-SGLUTION NO. 85-7A'w
A RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE TERREMARK CENTRE
PROJECT, A DE:;VFLCPtiFNT OI- RFGJ( NA1, IIl1PA1T, T(,
BE L0CATE,D AT APPRUX111.4TELY '�60-z58G
71GLRTAIL 4VI-NUE9 ,:'u4--),'4(, AVIA`IlUV� 1,VI NUV,
AND 2583-25b5 SOUTH PAY;HORE DRIVE, MIAMI,
FLORIDA; AUTE10P.i II.I NG 1;;1;UA.NCE ()F A
DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR .41I1) PR(jJECT' ATTACHED
HLFF;TO AS FIX11113I T "A"; AI-'PROV I NG FhU,)L1C'1'
WITH CONDITIONS, AFTER CONSIDERING THE REPORT
AND RfJCUhit,EPdDATIOIv ; OF THL ,(IUTH FLC)RI F.)A
REGIO14AL PLANNING COUNCIL AND THE PLANNING
ADV1':'ORY BOARD OF THE C1'1Y OF MiANT; `)U[JLC'1
TO THE CONDITIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER
ATTACHED HERETO AND TIIE 11,PPLICATIUN FCR
DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCORPORATED HEREIN BY
RLPEHENCE; FURTHER, DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK
TO SEND COPIES OF THE HEREIN RESOLUTION AND
SAID DEVELOPMENT ORDER TO AFFECTED AGENCIES
AND THE DEVELOPER.
WHEREAS, Grove bay Plazri, Limited, has submitted .-, complete
Application for Development Approval for a Development of
i fiegional Impact to the South Florida Regional Planning Council
pursuant to Section 380.06 Florida Statutes, and did receive a
favorable recommendation for a proposed development order, dated
i
January 7, 1985, as set forth in the Report and Recommendations
of the South Florida Regional Planning Council designated Exhibit
"B", on file with the Office of the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting
held on January 1b, 1985, following an advertised hearing adopted
Resolution No. PAB 9-85 by a 6 to O vote, recommending approval
of the Development Order for the Terremark Centre Project, a
Development df Regional Impact; and
WHEREAS, a recommendation from the Miami Planning Advisory
Board has been forwarded as required by Ordinance 8290; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission has conducted a public hearing
on January 24, 1985, having considered the Application for Major
Use Special Permit and the Application for Development Approval
and the Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional
Planning Council; and
WHEREAS, the
City
Commission has determined that
all legal
requirements have
been
complied with; and
WHEREAS, the
City
Commission deems it advisable
and in the
best interest of
the
general welfare of the City of Miami to
CITY CQMMISSIOV
- _ issue a Development Order as hereinafter set forth;
MEET I' OF
MAW -
JAN 24 1905
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
FINDINGS OF FACT
Section 1. The following findings of fact are made with
respect to the project:
a. The Commission has determined that the project is in
conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive
xy
Neighborhood Plan.
Q
b. The Commission has determined that the project is in
accord with the district zoning classification of Zoning
;
Ord•inance 9500.
C. The City - Commission finds that the project would not
create adverse impact on air quality, ground water,
soils, animal life, vegetation, wastewater management or
solid waste disposal, and further finds that it would
have a number of positive impacts including:
(1) Over 926 permanent jobs would be generated by the
-__
project. Nearly 482 additional full-time jobs
®
would be generated in the four county region, with
nearly $9.6 million increase in total wages and
$14.1 million in value added to the regional
economy.
(2) An annual surplus of over $1,005,692 to taxing
jurisdictions with approximately $355,653 for
Miami, $386,664 for, Dade County, $247,802 for the
School District, and $15,573 for the South Florida
Water Management District and special districts
combined.
d. The City Commission finds that the adverse impacts
related to water demand, energy demand, solid and
hazardous waste generation, stormwater runoff,
wastewater, demands on public services and traffic
generation will be mitigated by the conditions set forth
in Exhibit "A".
e. The City Commission finds that:
(1) The project will have a favorable impact on the
economy of the City; and
(2) The project will efficiently use public
transportation facilities; and
(3) The project will favorably affect the need for
people to find adequate housing reasonably
accessible to their places of employment; and
(4) The project will efficiently use necessary public
facilities; and
(5) The project will h,.ve a favorable impact on the
environment and natural resources of the City; and
(6) The project will not adversely affect living
conditions in the neighborhood; and
(7) The project would not adversely affect public
safety; and
(8) That there is a public need for the project.
Section 2. A Development Order, attached hereto as
Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof by reference, approving with
modifications, the Terremark Centre Project, a Development of
Regional Impact, proposed by Grove Bay Plaza, Limited, for all
that portion of Lot 1 less right-of-way; lots 2-4, 7-31 and
unnumbered lot also known as Lot 32, Block 39 NEW BISCAYNE
AMENDED (B-16), at approximately 2560-2580 Tigertail;
approximately 3204-3240 Aviation Avenue; and approximately 2583-
2585 South Bayshore Drive, be and the same is hereby granted and
issued.
Section 3. The Application for Development Approval as
revised is incorporated herein by reference and relied upon by
the parties in discharging their statutory duties under Section
380.06, Florida Statutes. Substantial compliance with the
representations contained in the Application for Development
Approval is a condition for approval unless waived or modified by
agreement among the parties.
Section 4. The Report and Recommendations of the South
Florida Regional Planning Council, attached hereto as Exhibit "$"
{
are incorporated by reference.
-3-
Y Y
t
t
Section 5. The development order, as approved, shall be
binding upon the applicants and any successors in interest.
Section b. The bevelopment Order, as approved, is
contingent on the subsequent issuance of a Major Use special
permit by the City Commission.
Section 7. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed
to send certified copies of this Resolution immediately to the
Florida Department of Veteran and Community Affairs, Division of
Local Resource Management, 2571 Executive Center Circle East,
Tallahassee, Florida, 32301; to the South Florida Regional
Planning Council, 3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 140, Hollywood,
Florida, 33021, and to Grove Bay Plaza Limited, 2600 SW 3rd
Avenue, Miami Florida, 33129.
Section 8. The recitals of fact referred to in the herein
"Whereas" clauses are true and correct and made a part thereof.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of January , 1985.
ATTEST:
RALP G. ONGIE, CITY CLEaW
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
&,� (DZ . , t,, PW
E. MAXWE
k�gISTANT CIH ATTORNEY
Maurice A. Ferre
MAURICE A. FERRE, MAYOR
COPROCTD W7 FORM AND
J. V% Ln n. LVVV
CITY ATTORNEY
-4- WOW
TIGERTAIL ASSOCIATION, INC., a )
non-profit Florida )
corporation; THELMA ALTSHULER; )
RONALD F. COLD; BARRY FELLMAN; )
DAVID STRONG; JIM STEWART; )
AGNETA HELDT; JAMES G. )
MCMASTER; MAX ROTH; MARJORIE )
STONEMAN DOUGLAS; WAYNE )
WILLIAMS and PAUL COLLINS, )
Plaintiffs, )
v. )
CITY OF MIAMI and GROVE BAY )
PLAZA, LTD., Appellee, )
Defendants. )
STATE OF FLORIDA )
} SS:
COUNTY OF DADE )
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN
AND FOR DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA
APPELLATE DIVISION
CASE NO. 85-056-AP
AFFIDAVIT OF SYLVIA LOWMAN
BEFORE ME, the undersigned Authority personally
appeared SYLVIA LOWMAN, who, after being duly sworn, deposes and
states:
1. My name is Sylvia Lowman and I make this Affidavit
with personal knowledge.
2. I am the Deputy City Clerk for the City of Miami
and my office is at 3500 Pan American Drive. I am presently the
Deputy City Clerk and have held that position for the past three
and a half years (3-1/2).
3. I prepared the transcript of the City Commission
meeting of January 24, 1985. The transcript has been prepared
and is a matter of public record and has been available for
review and for the purposes
mw
of photocopying
since April 8,
1985.
FURTHER AFFIANT,
SAYETH NAUGHT.
SYLVrA LOWMAN
SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME this
day of
October, 1985.
f
i
My -Commission Expires:
Notary
State
Public,
of Florida At argue
VoltnY PUetIC STATE DF WRIDA
ESP £i.Fi
GJIi)ED 1, :,u Ga;�f;G� it.S. U::U. .■► "�
i �
t L , i
f t,:
fi pc
January 29, 1985
Mr. Michael Garretson
Director
Florida Department, of Community Affairs
Division of Local Resource Management,
2571 Executive Center Circle East,
Tallahassee, Florida 32301
RE: TERREMARK CENTRE PROJECT
Dear Mr. Garretson:
Enclosed herein please find a copy of Resolution No. 85-72,
passed and adopted by the City of Miami Commission at its meeting
held on January 24, 1985, which is self explanatory.
On behalf of the City of Miami, thank you for your attention.
truly yours,
R 1ph G. Ongie
City Clerk
RGO: sl
ENC: a/s
1W CI?\ C1FR{. Ctt� He" 35(xi Vit Am. ,• :� FIT
j�—�::' �.7
O I — / pt/
SOUTH FLnRIOA REGIONAL PLANNING WUNCIL
January 7, 1985
852;
f
CA
January 29, 1985
Mr. Michael Garretson
Director
Florida Department of Community Affairs
Division of Local Resource Management,
2571 Executive Center Circle East,
Tallahassee, Florida 32301
RE: TERREMARK CENTRE PROJECT
Dear Mr. Garretson:
Enclosed herein please find a copy of Resolution No. 85-72,
passed and adopted by the City of Miami Commission at its meeting
held on January 24, 1985, which is self explanatory.
On behalf of the City of Miami, thank you for your attention.
truly yours,
C 5A;o .
R 1ph G. Ongie v
City Clerk
RGO:sl
ENC: a/s
< C=f I H i C!?1 C L I R Crt� Hey 35(9F'ar ".m, ;I .r P 0 N
4
00
SOUTH FLnRIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL
January 7, 1985
9
C' l
January 29, 1985
Mr. Barry Peterson
Director
South Florida Planning Council
3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 140
Hollywood, Florida 33021
RE: TERREMARK CENTRE PROJECT
Dear Mr. Peterson:
Enclosed herein please find a copy of Resolution No. 85-72,
passed and adopted by the City of Miami Commission at its meeting
held on January 24, 1985, which is self explanatory.
On behalf of the City of Miami, thank you for your attention.
truly yours,
*- 04 -�'
alph G. Ongie
City Clerk
RGO:sl
ENC: a/s
•�:: O0 THE C(T1 CIfRF C it. Fine 35(K- Pdl a.—,,.: , (lrnt V � � Ei ,� ti' " � ` � ., - � ;�'� �-.• �.
SOUTH FLnRIOA REGIONAL PLANNING CNNCIL
January 7, 1985
47 2'
k,
January 29, 1985
Grove Bay Plaza Limited
2600 S.W. 3rd Avenue
Miami, Florida 33129
RE: TERREMARK CENTRE PROJECT
Dear Sir :
Enclosed herein please find a copy of Resolution No. 85-72,
passed and adopted by the City of Miami Commission at its meeting
held on January 214, 1985, which is self explanatory.
On behalf of the City of Miami, thank you for your attention.
-ifer truly yours,
l
a ph G. Ongie
ity Clerk
RGO:sl
ENC: a/s
( 1 Ft. �'�5 Ci�k�, l f1,i� jillrl {l,: A'r.. ,. :1•.l l' Ni.1 (tl i{i.ri o- '�• {.. i �`7-�_i:'l. �I.:, y. hre
SOUTH FVRIDA REGIOVAL PLANNING COUNCIL
January 7, 1985
EXHIBIT "A"
ATTACHMENT TO
RESOLUTION
MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT
AND
DEVELOPMENT ORDER
Let it be known that the Commission of the City of Miami,
Florida, has considered in public hearing on January 249 1985;
a) the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit pursuant to Section
2803, Article 28 Major Use Special Permits: Detailed Requirements
of Zoning Ordinance 9500 and b) the issuance of a Development
Order for a Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Section
380.06 Florida Statutes, said major use and development to be
located in the City of Miami, at approximately 2560-2580
Tigertail; approximately 3204-3240 Aviation Avenue; and
approximately 2583-2585 South Bayshore Drive, being
Lot 1 less right-of-way; lots 2-4, 7-31 and unnumbered
lot also known as Lot 32, Block 39 NEW BISCAYNE AMENDED
(B-16).
ALL OF THE FOREGOING SUBJECT TO any dedications,
limitations, restrictions, reservations or easement of
record.
and after due consideration of the recommendations of the
Planning Director and Planning Advisory Board pertaining to the
Major Use Special Permit and after due consideration of the
consistency of this proposed development with pertinent
regulations and the Report and Recommendations of the South
Florida Regional Planning Council pertaining to the Development
of Regional Impact takes the following action:
Authorization to Issue a Major Use Special Permit
and
Approval of Application for Development Approval
both subject to the following modifications:
FINDING OF FACT WITH MODIFICATIONS
Development
1. The development proposed 724,900 gross square feet of floor
area, comprised of the following elements as specified by
the applicant in the Application for Development Approval.
Page 1 of 21
SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING WUNCIL
January 7, 1985
85-. 72
WP72;
Element Floor Area (S.F.)
Office (18 stories) 3149000
Retail (ground level) 89000
Residential (16 du's) 19,200
Parking (1050 spaces) 333,300
Recreation 509400
Total 724,900
This project is described and limited as shown on maps N-11-G-1,
N-11-H-19 N-11-H-29 N-11-H-39 N-11-H-49 N-11-H-5, N-11-H-69
N 11 H-79 N-1 1-H-8, N- 1 1-H-9, N-1 1-H- 10, and N-1 1-K-1 submitted
to the South Florida Regional Planning Council on November 30,
1984, prepared by Bermello, Kurki and Vera, Inc.
The project is further limited by applicable provisions and
procedures of City of Miami Zoning Ordinance 95000 as follows:
Per Schedule of District Regulations, Page 3 of 6,
District RO (Residential -Office), and per conceptual
plan and design schematic plans on file dated
November 309 1984, prepared by Bermello, Kurki and
Vera, Inc., with the following parameters for the site
bounded by Aviation Avenue, Tigertail Avenue and South
Bayshore Drive:
Element
Plaza (enclosed)
Open Space
Pedestrian Open Space
Office Tower height
Garage height
Residential height (TH)
Floor Area (S.F.)
3,800 s.f.
115,932 s.f.
43,419 s.f.
�371 9 1Off
451
45'
The project, as defined conceptually immediately above,
meets the requirements of Zoning Ordinance 9500 subject
to the submittal of construction documents in
conformity with Zoning Ordinance 9500 and applicable
City laws, precedent to the issuance of a building
permit, and the issuance of a Class C Special Permit as
required by Section 1552 of the Zoning Ordinance. This
Exhibit constitutes the conditions for a Major Use
Special Permit per Section 2803 of the Zoning
Ordinance.
THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS WILL:
1. Incorporate the following into the project design and
operation to minimize the cumulative impact of Terremark
traffic, and its associated pollutant emissions, on air
quality:
Page 2 of 21
SOUTH FLnRIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL
January 7, 1985
85-72
r
':
-- designate five percent of employee parking spaces,
located as close as possible to elevator and building
entrances, for exclusive car or vanpool use.
actively encourage and promote car and van pooling by
establishing a car pool information program, and
t-
offering preferred parking spaces and work shifts to car
p
and van poolers.
-- actively encourage and promote transit ridership by
n
providing regular shuttle service, pursuant to Condition
16 below, between the project and the Coconut Grove
rx„
Metrorail Station, and by providing Metrorail, Metrobus,
and shuttle service route and schedule information in
convenient locations throughout the project.
�,
-- Promote staggered flex -time work schedules, four day
work weeks, or other management actions and marketing
strategies, that reduce peak demand for roadway capacity
.§^..�-
`e,�
and thereby reduce transportation energy use.
$kaJ7Fqq
2. Design, construct, and maintain the stormwater management
r�
system to meet the following standards:
�`
-- Retain all washdown water from the parking garage in a
vegetated retention area with a raised catch basin('s)
"f
that direct(s) any overflow to sedimentation boxes and,
subsequently, drainage wells.
Wash down parking areas only when there is adequate
storage capacity in the swale (s) .
.
-- Construct all catch basins to retain oil and grease, and
regularly maintain the catch basins.
-- Vacuum sweep the garage area before every washdown.
3. Submit a revised drainage plan showing swale location,
dimensions, general runoff routing network, and calculations
which demonstrate adequate swale capacity to the Council for
review and approval before requesting any building permits
for the project and as part of the consolidated Application
for Development Approval required by Condition 19 below.
4. As part of the transportation improvements required in
Table 1, reconstruct the street drainage system for Aviation
Avenue, from South Bayshore Drive to Tigertail Avenue to
manage runoff from a 5-Year storm by retaining the first 1.5
inches of runoff in french drains, with overflow from the
design storm discharging to Biscayne Bay. If underground
utilities prohibit use of french drains, the Applicant will
construct a drainage well system capable of managing the 5-
year storm.
Page 3 of 21
85-'72
SOUTH FLMRIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL
January 7, 1985
— 771
5. Incorporate into the development, by restrictive covenant
17
and/or lease or sales agreements, as applicable, hazardous
materials accident prevention, mitigation, and response
standards, to be met by the Applicant and all tenants
classified by a SIC code listed Table 4 of the Council DRI
•
Assessment that use, handle, store, display,
y, or generate
hazardous materials (ignitable, corrosive, toxic, or
��.•
reactive), including those identified in Table 5 of the
£?t
Council DRI Assessment; provided, however, that the uses in
•<
Table 4 and the wastes in Table 5 shall be simultaneously
amended upon the addition or deletion of any or all of the
°_.
listed uses, materials, or wastes by amendment to the
"County and Regional Hazardous Waste Assessment Guidelines"
incorporated by reference into Rule 17-31.03(2)0 Florida
Administrative Code. At a minimum, these standards shall:
-- require that areas within buildings where hazardous
materials or hazardous wastes are to be used, displayed,
=T:
handled generated or stored shall be constructed with
impervious floors, without drains, to ensure containment
°
and facilitate cleanup of any spill or leakage.
"�
-- require that the loading/unloading of any hazardous
material or hazardous waste shall occur in a covered
y
loading/unloading dock with a spill containment area not
w.•'s
connected to the project drainage or sewer system.
-- prohibit any outside storage of hazardous materials or
hazardous waste.
0
-- require all hazardous waste generators to contract with
a licensed public or private hazardous waste disposal
service or processing facility and to provide to Dade
County DERM copies of one of the following forms of
documentation of proper hazardous waste management
practices:
- a hazardous waste manifest;
- a shipment to a permitted hazardous waste management
facility; or
- a confirmation of receipt of materials from a
recycler or a waste exchange operation.
-- notify any tenant generating wastes of the penalties for
improper disposal of hazardous waste pursuant to Section
403.7279 Florida Statutes.
-- Allow reasonable access to facilities for monitoring by
the City, Dade County DERM, and Florida DER to assure
compliance with this development order and all
applicable laws and regulations.
Page 4 of 21
SOUTH FLMRIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL
January 7, 1985
85 -` 72'
85., 72;
00
6. Remove all invasive exotic plants from the project site as
the site is cleared, and amend the landscape plan to ensure
use of only those plant species included in Table 6 of the
Council DRI Assessment in future project landscaping.
7• Prior to any site clearing, consult with, and follow the
recommendations of, the Dade County Urban Forester
concerning transplanting trees presently on the site.
8. Delay construction up to three months in any area where
potentially significant historic or archaeological artifacts
are uncovered, and permit State and local historic
preservation officials to survey and excavate the site.
9. Obtain the necessary approvals from Dade WASA for water and
wastewater service.
10. Construct the building to allow emergency helicopter
evacuation from the roof.
11. Collaborate with the Police Department to incorporate
security measures and systems into the design and operation
of the project.
12. Enter into an agreement with the City to contribute a fair
share of capital facilities required to provide adequate
sanitary sewer and fire service to the project, or, in the
alternative, pay a fair share contribution pursuant to an
adopted City impact fee ordinance pertaining to fire service
and sanitary sewers if such impact fee ordinance is adopted
by the City prior to obtaining final certificates of
occupancy for more than 200,000 square feet of development
on -site.
13. Incorporate the following energy conservation measures into
the development:
-- Landscape shading of open spaces.
-- Separate electric metering of office and residential
tenants. -
-- Use of natural light and fluorescent task lighting.
-- Hot water temperatures set at or below 90OF, except
where otherwise specified by health codes.
- - Central energy management system in the office tower
that will provide start/stop optimization, time of day
scheduling, electric demand limiting, night temperature
setback/setup, programmed maintenance, and building
lighting control.
Page 5 of 21
SOUTH FLnR I DA REG 104AL PLANNING CfVNC I L
January 7, 1985
85-'7Z
84
t
1
-- Air distribution using a variable air volume system.
-- Insulated glass that is tinted or solar reflective.
-- Airlock doors at major project entrances.
-- Light -reflecting and/or light colored wall and roof
surfaces, with solar absorption coefficients less than
or equal to 0.50.
-- Bicycle racks and storage areas for project employees.
-- Lavatory water flow of 0.8 gallons per minute or less,
water closets that use no more than three and one half
gallons per flush, and flow restricting shower heads.
-- Reduction of cooled space by thermally isolating non-
critical areas, such as closets and other storage areas.
-- High efficiency air conditioning systems with minimum
EER rating of 10.0 in the office tower and 9.5 in
residential areas.
-- Measures that effectively yield, in the cooling mode,
R-11 in walls and R-19 in ceilings.
-- Non -electric energy sources for space heating, cooking,
and water heating, if feasible.
-- Solar water heaters in townhouse units, as feasible.
-- Computerized elevator control system (Otis Elevonic or
equivalent).
14. Construct all roadway and intersection improvements
identified in Table 1 and dedicate the improvements to the
City, prior to issuance of final certificates of occupancy
for more than 200,000 gross square feet of development on -
site.
15. Deposit $60,000 in an interest -bearing escrow account as
partial construction funding for the County -programmed
4-laving of NW 27th Avenue from US 1 to South Bayshore
Drive, prior to issuance of certificates of occupancy for
more than 200,000 square feet of final gross floor area on -
site. Such funds will be released to the County at any time
upon request. The Applicant will annually notify the County
Public Works Department of the availability of these funds
until such time as the County expends these funds. A copy
of this notification will be included in the annual report
required by Condition 20 herein.
Page 6 of 21
85-7 c
SOUTH FVR I DA REGIONAL PLANNING VUNC I L
January 7, 1985
p
I
w
TABLE 1
APPLICANT'S RECOMMENDED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
Year Location
1987 Aviation Avenue from
S. Bayshore Drive to
Tigertail Avenue
1987 SW 27th Avenue/Tiger-
tail Avenue
1987 Aviation Avenue/
Tigertail Avenue
1987 Aviation Avenue/S.
Bayshore Drive
Sub -Total
Improvement
3 lanes, middle
lane for left turns
(Figure 1)
NB, SB thru lanes
NB left -turn lane
WB right -turn lane
(Figure 2)
EB left -turn lane
on Tigertail
WB left -turn lane
on Tigertail to
Aviation Avenue
(Figure 1)
WB left -turn lane
on Tigertail to
Terremark drive-in
bank entrance
NB left -turn lane
on Bayshore
(Figure 1 )
Page 7 of 21
SOUTH FLMRIOA REGIONAL PLANNING WUNCIL
January 7, 1985
Cost
1984 dollars
$1000000
70,000
45,000
15,000
$2309000
85 -",72
SIG URE 1
AVIATION AVE. AND INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
D
v a�4
.: +..• :x
SOURCE: ADA
SS-1'�
Page 8 of 21
SOUTH FORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING CWNCIL
jonuary 7. 1985
W ►,
I
FIGURE 2
RECOMMENDED IMRROVEMENTS:
SW 27TH AVENUE/TIGERTAIL AVENUE
EXISTING
PROPOSED
SOURCE: ADA
i 85-'72
Page 9 of 21
SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL
January 7, 1965
135-72',
I V
16. After final certificates of occupancy are issued for more
than 200,000 gross square feet of building space, provide
shuttle service each weekday using a minimum of two vans or
buses to and from the Coconut Grove Metrorail station at
10-minute or less intervals from 7:00 to 10:00 am and from
3:30 to 6:30 pm, and at 30-minute or less intervals from
10:00 am to 3:30 pm (off-peak).
17. Work with the City to prepare a Minority Participation and
Employment Plan to be submitted within ninety (90) days of
the issuance of the Development Order.
18. Work with the City to develop a Minority
Contractors/Subcontractors Participation Plan to be
submitted within ninety (90) days of the issuance of this
Development Order.
19. Consolidate all original and supplemental ADA information
into a revised Application for Development Approval (ADA),
and submit three copies of the document to the Council and
one copy to the City and the Florida Department of Community
Affairs within ninety (90) days of the effective date of
this Development Order.
20. Prepare and submit a monitoring report, twelve (12) months
from the date of issuance of this Development Order and each
twelve (12) months thereafter until a final Certificate of
Occupancy is issued; to the South Florida Regional Planning
Council; the State of Florida Department of Community
Affairs, Division of Local Resource Management; all affected
permitting agencies and the Planning Director, City of Miami
Planning Department. This report shall contain, for the
preceding twelve (12) months.
-- A general description of construction progress in terms
of construction dollars and employment compared to the
schedule in the applicant's Application for Development
Approval.
-- A cumulative list of all permits or approvals applied
for, approved or denied.
-- A statement as to whether any proposed project
construction changes in the ensuing twelve (12) months
are expected to deviate substantially from the approvals
included in this Development Order.
-- Any additional responses required by rules adopted by
the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs and
any other information required by Section
380.06(14)(c)(3) F. S.
Page 10 of 21
8S--7 c
SOUTH FLMRIOA REGIONAL PLANNING CRUNCIL
January 7, 1985
I f.
Further, throughout project operation, and unless and until
Rule 17-310 Florida Administrative Code, is repealed or
otherwise declared null and void, the annual monitoring
report shall include the following information:
-- Identification of all tenants that meet the criteria
established in Tables 4 and 5 of the Council DRI
Assessment, as may be amended pursuant to Condition 5
herein.
-- For each such tenant, copies of one of the following
types of documentation of appropriate hazardous waste
disposal:
- a hazardous waste manifest,
- a bill of lading from a transporter indicating
shipment to a permitted hazardous waste management
facility, or
- a confirmation of receipt of material from a recycler
of a waste exchange operation.
-- Description of any incidents or spills of hazardous
materials, including but not limited to those in Table
5, as it may be amended; and specification of the
actions taken to clean up and dispose of the spilled
material.
The Planning Director, City of Miami Planning Department, or
a project director to be named later, is hereby designated
to receive this report, and to monitor and assure compliance
with this Development Order.
21. Give notice to Richard P. Brinker, Clerk, Dade County
Circuit Court, 73 West Flagler Street, Miami, Florida,
33130, for recording in the Official Records of Dade County,
Florida, as follows:
a) That the City Commission of the City of Miami, Florida,
has issued a Development Order for the Terremark Centre
Project, a ' Development of Regional Impact located at
approximately 2560-2580 Tigertail; approximately 3204-
3240 Aviation Avenue; and approximately 2583-2585 South
Bayshore Drive, being
Lot 1 less right-of-way; lots 2-4, 7-31 and
unnumbered lot also known as Lot 32, Block 39 NEW
BISCAYNE AMENDED (B-16).
ALL OF THE FOREGOING SUBJECT TO any dedications,
limitations, restrictions, reservations or
easement of record.
Page 11 of 21
85--'72
SOUTH FORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING CnUNCIL
January 7, 1985
V. I
0
b) That Grove Bay Plaza, Limited, is the developer with
offices at 2600 SW 3rd Avenue, Miami, Florida, 33129.
c) That the Development Order with any modifications may be
examined in the City Clerk's Offices, 3500 Pan American
Drive, Dinner key, Miami, Florida, 33133-
d) That the Development Order constitutes a land
development regulation applicable to the property; that
the conditions contained in this Development Order shall
run with the land and bind all successors in interest;
it being understood that recording of this notice shall
not constitute a lien, cloud or encumbrance on real
property, nor actual nor constructive notice of any of
the same.
THE CITY WILL:
22. Withhold issuance of final certificates of occupancy for
more than 200,000 gross square feet of development on -site
until the Applicant has complied with Conditions 14 and 15.
23. Stay the effectiveness of the Development Order and no
development permits thereunder shall be granted, until such
time as an Amended ADA, providing updated information, is
submitted to the Council, City, and State and an Amended
Development Order issued, if Conditions 1 through 19 have
not been complied with within four years from the effective
date of the Development Order. Should the Development Order
be stayed pursuant to this condition, nothing herein shall
be construed to limit Condition 21 below that this
Development Order runs with the land, and its terms and
conditions are binding on the Applicant, its successors,
and/or assigns.
24. Enter into, within one year of the date of issuance of the
development order, a fair -share agreement with the Applicant
to contribute to necessary improvements in fire service for
the project.
25. Consult with the Applicant to ensure incorporation of
security measures and systems into the design and operation
of the project, including provision for emergency helicopter
evacuation from the roof of the office tower.
General
26. The Application for Development Approval is incorporated
herein by reference and is relied upon by the parties in
discharging their statutory duties under Chapter 380,
Florida Statutes. Substantial compliance with the
representations contained in the Application for Development
Page 12 of 21
SOUTH FORIOA REGIONAL PLANNING VUNCIL
.Ianuary 7, 1985
85-'7`'
I A-,
0
Approval is a condition for approval unless waived or
modified by agreement among the Council, City and Applicant,
its successors and/or assigns.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Terremark Centre Project, proposed by Grove Bay Plaza
Limited, complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan,
is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City
of Miami, and complies with local land development regulations
being Zoning Ordinance No. 9500; and
The proposed development does not unreasonably interfere with the
achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land
Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami; and
The proposed development is generally consistent with the Report
and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning
Council and does not unreasonably interfere with any of the
considerations and objectives set forth in Chapter 380, Florida
Statutes.
Page 13 of 21
SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING CNNCIL
January 7, 1985
85-'72'
A�rAM10 fMONtAYi 4+f704
t
I
C
9 srwu• ,n, waft
SOUTH FLMRIDA REGIONAL PLANNING WUNCIL
January 7. 146
r
r
3
a
c
m
�
A
J
>
•
r
j
1
Z
A
r
III i ' liilll �,��,�III�I��YIIIiIIIJII
milli
� o ooa�► ao
va
•�aar�r.�.��rrr.r,.��r�i
rrrt
0
r±"
{ I
RECREATIONAL LEVEL -PARKING ROOF DECK
N
Go
N
N
EAST ELEVATION
LrLj
zi
i
WEST ELEVATION
ml
.:.. tnnnnnnnnn �
rnnnnnnnnnT f
nnnnnnonnn:
lnnnnnnnnnnnnl
��nannnnnnnnnnn,
�nnnnnnnnnnnnn±
�nnnnnnnnnnnnn�
NORTH ELEVATION
r-
](mil[] A�AQIQPCs
HIM. dD➢Gf A
A
1]
•. 0
N
C
F-
r
z
�a
drn
z
� a
r �
VI
%A a
Z
Z
z
Mp
r_
z
z
r
SOUTH ELEVATION
�n I I j1llll�'I11,I,I1���
-�nnnnnnnn ���,
�nnnnnnnn� n I
nnnn-�nnnn-�nn
nnnnnnnnnnnnn
L� nnnnnnnnnn„nl
'nnnnnnnmm�n�
t*-
r W.
.Il�.dii�Y��I�IIWIii WidII�I�W
V
/
SECOND FLOOR PLAN u.L., K
b
(U
70
.. ,li,llll1.
IK• (I ; 1 �; ;�' � 1 1 1 1
0 ( �• 1 1( � 1 1 1,.
N ,•
N FOURTH FLOOR PLAN LrLj K
_
1'" .._- --- -- -
------. _.r
1 1
1
1
1.1�•
1 1 � 1 1 1�
THIRD FLOOR PLAN LJ
TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN (5-14)
LPL-i R
0 1
go
r
IT,
i►ITT
I�il
! l- l
'Il llllil I IIII :,
II ► Cu
i IIIIIIIiII HIM
�! II
LILJ
LrU
o BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN
W
V,
N
i .
't.. .. .�1►" ""'��' ,�•°'S,'�"."�„o.ssvr"a..r•. Wri.+ti►t+'M�Y-rrtar.•.'w...� �+tit''w"ri .► . +• �.+��'
.- - ...-
• •. �.. .. .r.L�r''.•...7'Lr'•7�r'�"•-•rt:t'�c.i.:a�'i' •,5��•�'�'::r.: �'y....•h.�::�!it'R1M:i1h•.W+m:a•±;lei'.i:�'.:f�wyi'hw^..3if+, ter.
EXHIBIT 'B'
lu
I-'
u
011
Attached to and Incoroorated b
Reference to TerreMark Centre
Development Order and Major Us
Special Permit
Resolution
Resolution
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
m
.. ... ., .�, .. .... ..�.. _ •• ..... ._ ..•...:...:'r. a.ti. r, ._. .. - ., ;�ti`h vie•.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
.
LIST
OF FIGURES.......................................................
I
LISTOF
TABLES........................................................
11
INTRODUCTION..........................................................
1
PART
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................
2
A. APPLICANT INFORMATION ..................................
2
B. PROJECT INFORMATION ....................................
2
PART
11. PROJECT IMPACTS AND ISSUES .................................
15
A. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES ......................
15
Be ECONOMY ................................................
38
C. PUBLIC FACILITIES ......................................
42
0. TRANSPORTATION .........................................
47
op
PART
111. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...............................
73
a
�� �a.•a.• �vt. Y'�.'-� ti�.::�•i s�.S'• ��a�'"w'hl'.";'�!"�.� �y.-.cam „i'!r.. -. ... ' - r�•CS.wr:�C"-:.i�:r....__ �.� ...
._ .. ... _. . ' :: th'i•+:G�'•Hi.�+ ? ic`.; •sw::t �'6•••':'.�.... : u.�,.....�:.:` �!`;it.�:►a0.',l'•:'Y.::1�'!i. �:'sirtl: '.:.' •..... :i.: ......... ... :+�' •�',- - . .. ...�
ru
0
E
Figure No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
LIST OF FIGURES
Title
Location Map ............................................ .
Existing Site ............................................
Project Cross Section ....................................
Site Access and Egress Locations .........................
Proposed Zoning ..........................................
Traffic Impact Area ......................................
Existing Traffic Conditions ..............................
Programmed and Planned Roadway Improvements ..............
1987 Background Traffic Conditions .......................
Committed Development Location Map .......................
Future Traffic Conditions (Witnout Project) ..............
Future Traffic Conditions (Witn Project)
Aviation Avenue and Intersection Improvements ............
Recommended Improvements: SW 27th Ave./Tigertail Ave. ....
Development Susceptibility ...............................
Page
3
4
6
8
it
48
50
53
54
56
57
60
65
66
70
Y
• f r .. .C. r... .r Jir.. .. ... ...... Gnu_
' .. .. . . • f. - rr.rr.�� - ..r rL µ,'Y.,L�Y4n i �•..�:r w.`.� -
LIST OF TABLES
7 Table
No. Title
Page
1
Proposed Development Component ..............................
5
2
Maximum Development with Existing Zoning ....................
9
3
Estimated Runoff Pollutant Loads ............................
23
4
List of Potential Hazardous Waste Generators by SIC Code ....
26
5
Code for Waste Types Commonly Associated with each
SIC Code ..................................................
31
6
Recommended Plant Species ...................................
34
7
Construction Costs ..........................................
38
9
Permanent Employment Impacts ................................
40
9
Fiscal Impact ...............................................
41
10
Projected On -Site Energy Use at Bui!dout ....................
43
11
Existing Traffic Conditions: Road Segments Operating Below
LOSIVV...................................................
49
12
Programmed Roadway Improvements .............................
52
13
Project Traffic Impacts: Critical Intersections ............
61
14
Applicant Fair Share of Programmed Roadway Improvements .....
64
15
Applicant Fair Share of Recommended Roadway Improvements ....
68
00
t t 85-72:
M.T'^�'_►re'��rc�",'�•.•w�►�... "- .fit., • •_ -
I*
00
_. .. .. •+' _.. .=._ _ . [•: w, AF'wQfjM rMM.Jt ^wq 7"'.+"'rT�Ye'.!M�1%• 'W .M .. Jr..+.. .. _
INTRODUCTION
This assessment of the proposed Terremark Centre mixed -use development
has been prepared by the South Florida Regional Planning Council, as
required by the Florida Environmental Land and Water Management Act for
al i Developments of Regional impact.
The assessment Is based on information supplied by the Applicant, by
Miami and Dade County staff, official plans, consultants, and field
inspections. Additional research relative to specific issues was
conducted by Councii staff where needed.
In accordance with the Act, this assessment is intended to provide an
overview of the positive and negative impacts Likely to result from the
proposal. The recommendations are intended to assist the City Commission
in reaching a decision on the proposed development through consideration
of regional, as we) I as local, impacts ano issues. They do not abridge
the legal responsibility of local government to act pursuant to
applicable local laws or ordinances.
Copies of any "development order" tan order granting, denying, or
granting witn conditions an appi ication for a development permit) issued
with regard to this project should be transmitted to the South Florida
Regional Planning Council and the Florida Department of Community
Affairs.
.. ... .. ... .. ... .. .. .. _. .._ .. ...�. ... may'.. :�' .,. _.-
PART I - PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A. APPLICANT INFORMATION
Project Name: Terremark Centre
Applicant: Grove Bay Plaza, Ltd.
2600 S.W. 3rd Avenue, Penthouse
Miami, Florida 33129
Date of Acceptance of Application: July 25, 1984
Date of Receipt of Notice of Local Public hearing: August 14, 1984 and
November 26, 1984
Deadline for Council Action: January 7, 1985
Date of Local Public hearing: January 24, 1985
Type of Development: Office/Retail/Residential
Location of Development: Miami (Coconut Grove), Dade County
9 B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed Terremark Centre project is located on the southwest
corner of Aviation Avenue and Bayshore Drive in Coconut Grove
(Figure 1). The site Is presently occupied by five two-story, one
six -story, and three three-story apartment buildings (Figure 2).
Approximately 274 persons reside in the 153 apartment units with
rental rates from $300 to $650 per month. in addition to the
residential s'fructures, there are approximately 5,000 square feet of
offices on -site. All existing structures will be demolished before
construction of the Terremark Centre begins.
•
I .-r
•--+• .:ea.:Yi.�w.:.7�. ... .y._...::.:•t'.':�.:'.tt•1.'f:'ni�;�,.:♦.�.�... _.iac'�:"'.. .� .•__.. .a,l�i�-t.'.:. ..,
ID
0
FIGURE 1
LOCATION MAP
1fO�f� 00 r
1
Unaf♦" .
.Gowns
t6 7i
7 J 1•
� Ii'
'�
•r �� �1{
i..r• /�e
�
orr
rw
E
.y1
` !•R..r
���� Ali
1111/
owl
�N•IrtY. •♦ � 1 �
i�
wllw•Ir � Y i
w
1
1
• 7 rt
1
�
•
1••Iwl
04
k _. 7
- ..•�• 1•••1 ,• �..IMy
cow
NlfaYl
•
"..�.�....�.
••••' • L f
1
•
.. �rl . fMl • .� Ifs • .
:....
s-
�u
w
'•1
•/•
.t
�
•`i1 j i f r r
•
�
,
rry�y{r1����
• I
IW�s cTrrE
AIscAl vf.
www
f •
'
RA V
� 1-4
I
.—.
1 ..�
i
•�7 , t ♦IIMM•Y
y
ril00
..�.
;•T` .r
rb
f�
1
?'..y..� •' waiYr
1N
do .
� tJ
Cn SOURCE: ADA
�V
FIGURE 2
EXISTING SITE
R
Jt
i
1'?
•�
f
1
.j
r'
Ai
v
r
The proposed Terremark Centre (Figure 3) consists of a 18-story
office tower with ground floor retail facing Bayshore Drive. The
office tower will be connected to a five level. 1,052 car parking
garage ( four levels above ground, one level underground) . Exercise
and recreational facilities will be located on the roof of the
parking garage•. The office tower will contain 314,000 gross square
feet of office space and 80000 gross square feet of ground -floor
retail space (Table 1). In addition, a row of 16
townhouse/apartment units wi i 1 be constructed adjacent to the
parking structure, facing Tigertail Avenue.
TABLE 1
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT COMPONENT
Approx lmate
use Gross Seuare Feet
Office Tower
Office Space 314,900
Refali Space 8.000
Residential Space 19.200 (16 units)
Subtotal 341,200
Parking Garage (1.052 spaces) 333.3110
Recreational Level 50,400
Subf+otai 3a3 mo
TOTAL 724.900
!. SOURCE: ADA
An indoor gal leria wi I I serve as an entrance for pedestrians along
Bayshore Drive, and Introduce retail shopping at the street level.
-�I The pedestrian walkways along the retail edge of the office building
will be sheltered by a covered arcade.
S /`Q
"T
fir.
OFFICE TOWER
I(nn
I ; ,(inn
;rnnnn
i :fnnnnn
�(nnnnnn
innnnnnn
_ fnnnnnnnn
. .�nnnnnnnnn
.:fnnnnnnnnnn
l l .�nnnnnnnnnnn
V.
FIGURE 3
PROJECT CROSS
SECTION
TOWNHOUSES
PARKING GARAGE TIGERTAtL
AVENUE
:....
�--------�
[lip
i
10
LAmi
0 20
•
3
M1
1
is
�N
'. v. .. . .. �.... • ._. ._uy
a
0
0
.. •- r — ..':1P.a+.'•.err...h�:i:�iit+':u�.•Tt,�ryr. i'P�t�,1,•.w.r:'-:'1, :;.`.F','4A.N'; t4' S ;..y.�r..w.,.�..
The 11,052 space parking garage will be accessed from Aviation
Avenue. There wliI be one entrance lane from Tigertail Avenue for
the drive-in bank and service area (Figure 4). The roof of the
garage will be constructed to offer Jogging, tennis, swimming,
racquetball, and other exercise facilities.
Project const.ruction is anticipated in one phase, beginning in
mid-1985, with completion in mid-1986.
The project appears to be consistent with the generalized land uses
specified in the Miami 1974 Planning Study for Coconut Grove and
1976 Miami Comprehensive Plan. The 1974 Planning Study for Coconut
Grove designates the Terremark site as "High Density
Office -Residential" for the portion of the site adjacent to South
Bayshore Drive, and "Medium Density Multiple" (residential) for the
portion facing Tigertail Avenue.
The 1976 Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, prepared In accordance
with the Local Government Comprehensive Planning Act, also
designates the portion of the site facing South Bayshore Drive as
"Residential/Commercial" and the portion facing Tigertail Avenue as
"Moderate Density Residential" (up to 24 dwelling units per acre).
The property is presently zoned RO-3/6 and RG-2/5 with the RG-2/5
portion overlain by the Special Public interest (SPI) District 3.
7
st
195-72;
i
• i'
FIGURE 4
y.
SITE ACCESS AND EGRESS LOCATIONS
46
Lu
Li i 1-��
� � � �'�.'� .-1 Jar -u+l-� t ...... �' ::•�
I k 411.
T;
II
� -.s € d. `.i, f �+III •
� Ywl.�
i a •wwwwwwwwwwwwww.y w arvaa w.+• .,k �' s -'`� l �y i'k; . �
«��E F�Ri11B NKt �� ENTRANCE'': j ,� .;d;� t. :.. t S i•: �
t:
_ •,� •,fir.,.. .r�,^Aat..., y,M. _,.., ,... - ., -
7 M
• .. _, - .. -�... - ^' .. _'�"sas1L.•�."_. r. ;�.�:�.�t-r Y�-.t^a' n.`Y.eS�_4ts��,,,�,4aa..lr.•��+!!�`� •-°:�"';.1'i... '?"....��.- _ � �.,r^ -•� .
0
.... -.. ? •. ... - - ...:<<.i;;.:e:.. .......ems: _ _.:..' _ _ _,_,s.•. ,:.:::• .,_.. . ............... ,.. _.. _.. _...r... ...
According to the City, the existing zoning allows maximum
development as shorn in Table 2.
TABLE 2
MAXiMW DEVELOPMENT WITH EXISTING ZONING
Zoning Category
RG - 2/5 (Rear)
RO - 3/6 '(Front)
TOTAL
e Retail not permitted.
SMACE: City of Mi M I
Maximum Sauer* Feet by Use"
411,300 residentiel
143,990 office and/or residential
192,290
The R/O zoning category was created by the City to encourage a mix
of office and residential along South Bayshore Drive. W wever,
office rental rates are generally much higher than residential
rents, consequently there is little incentive for developers to
construct residential buildings.
Recent development pressures in Coconut Grove prompted the Miami
Planning Department to prepare a Bayshore Drive Development Study in
November, 1984. The purpose of the study was to examine the proper
zoning required to control growth in the Bayshore Drive area of
Coconut Grove, while also addressing the need to provide parking for
the Dinner Key area given the City Commission's decision to prohibit
structured or decked parking on the Bay side of South Bayshore
Drive.
G7
10
'Tne study recommends that at property between South Bayshore Drive
and Tigertai 1 Avenue, and between Mary Street and just northeast of
Aviation Avenue (Figure 5) including the Terremark site, be rezoned
to RO-3/6, which would delete the RG-2/5 category presently
southwest of Aviation and southeast of Tigertai l . The study also
recommends that the present RO-3/6 allowable floor space to tot
area, or floor area ratio (FAR), should remain at 1.21. Wwever, to
provide for parking in the Dinner Key area, any developnent tnat
provides parking over the amount required to serve the development
would be entitled to receive a FAR bonus, if the excess parking is
available for public use.
On December 13, 1984, the Miami Commission approved in principle the
Bayshore Drive Development Study and scheduled public hearings
before the Planning Advisory Board and the City Commission to
consider the rezoning recommendations in the Bayshore Study, as well
as the adoption of a Special Public Interest District (SPi-17:
South Bayshore Drive Overlay District) that would overlay the RO-3/6
zoning along South Bayshore Drive.
The SPI -17 overlay district, as proposed, Implements the growtn
controls suggested in the Bayshore Drive Development Study. The
proposed SPI-17, like the Bayshore Study, reflects the policy
decision by the City to allow Increased density along South Bayshore
Drive In exchange for public parking needed for Dinner Key.
0
FIGURE 5
PROPOSED ZONING
0
CA
Sfl CE: CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT
{
'y
6
..
r
tt1',
i
i
r^7
0
. . '' , .. � ♦ - - _ .. �•^��"M � .....�"�Jrf"'ti'i^Yr.1 •t''•�'ltr�1:+► a n i,�v. 1! , yrp y . t'.' i`� ,.-, � .
Following is a brief summary of the provisions of the proposed
SP I -17:
• To provide a transitional buffer between residential uses along
west Tigertail Avenue and office uses along South Bayshore Drive,
the firs+ 100 feet of lot depth adjacent to Tigertail Avenue
shall be either a landscaped yard area or residential uses no
higher than forty-five feet. Provided that residential
development occurs, ancillary and parking structures for
non-residential uses no greater in height than the residential
structures may be located below grade to within 20 feet of
Tigertail Avenue or above grade witnin 50 feet of Tigertail
Avenue.
• In response to the City decision to prohibit parking structures
In Dinner Key, the estimated shortage by 1990 of 650 parking
spaces (minimum) for the Dinner Key area is intended to be
provided by allowing a building density bonus for developers
along South $ayshore Drive if they provide more parking than is
required and make it available to the public. For every parking
space provided in excess of offstree+ parking requirements, an
additional two hundred (200) square feet of floor area for any
use will be permitted, provided however;
JJ,.r _ r -_a• tea.. ..�.W F+.r.ii` J _
+ ..::Y" `..';'•:"y,�.d .^yd.Mrs.��.+`1,.,+++`�'r�+Yrx�-.�..°�...::.'A.
•
a) There may not be less than one hundred spaces and tney must
be open to the general pubiic during normal business or
operating hours of public activities or attractions at
Dinner Key or adjacent public facilities.
b) Parking fees shall not exceed those for public metered
parking in the vicinity.
c) Entrance to the parking shall not be more than six hundred
(600) feet from a structure housing a major public facility
In Dinner Key.
d) The cumulative floor area permitted may not exceed 0.50
10 times gross lot area.
• No building in the district shall exceed a height of 250 feet or
22 stories in height, whichever is lower.
As previously proposed, the Terremark Centre was to have twin
towers: an office tower of 2519000 square feet and a residential
tower of 1880600 square feet (95 units). In addition, 16 townhouse
units were proposed. The proposal would have required a zoning
change from RO-3/6 to RO-3/8 to allow for a FAR of 2.42, which is
twice that of any other Sayshore Drive development iin Coconut Grove.
After meeting with Council staff, City staff, and Coconut Grove
f
.. .. _ � n .. .. .. .fir.' N•..
, � .. .. -.. !";'- ^'K•w'.... �. f;� ter: !'�;'>�+t;. ,i..
residents, the developer postponed DRI review until the Bayshore
Drive Development Study was completed. In December, 1984, the
developer scaled down project plans to be in conformance with the
new plan and revised the DR 1 Application for Development Approval
accordingly.
Tne Terremark proposal, with 341,200 gross square feet and a 1.71
FAR (with bonus), not including the garage structure, is in
conformance with the recommended Bayshore Drive Redevelopment Study
zoning recommendations and the proposed SPI-17 overlay district.
The portion of the development fronting Tigertail conforms to the
residential requirement, with garage and townhouse building height
no higher than 45 feet above average grade. A major special use
lip permit, which is required for all office buildings in the City over
2009000 square feet, will be required in addition to the zoning
changes.
. a�j":.i.%'.1�:ww'::�:»� �rw'`w.w t tTr"!�:". �• .. _ ....ram. 5......... __- . . _ _ -
.. :n.:�• .:•t.•:psi.e+a.ryr''.J:•,..:.r:'Li1iN�,"��..•iitw:'..........�.:1.:`�'�..'�"ai:.V:FLi::-tii.L"C'::.t_^5....r. •�..-..._...-....•...._ :.�-�•:. .. .. . � .�..... ..... ......,.. .._... .•
P
PART ii - PROJECT IMPACTS AND ISSUES
A. ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES
t. Air
Complex source permits are no longer required by either the
Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (DER) or Dace
County Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM).
However, one- and eight -hour carbon monoxide concentrations
were estimated by the Applicant using computer modeling.
Concentrations of carbon monoxide were predicted at two
receptor points in the vicinity of the proposed Terremark
Centre. These points were selected to represent probable
locations of maximum carbon monoxide concentrations where human
exposure could be reasonably expected over one and eight hour
periods. Receptor 1 was located 50 feet west of Bayshore Drive
and 330 feet south of Aviation Avenue, and receptor 2 was
located 50 feet north of Aviation Avenue and 50 feet west of
Bayshore Drive.
The maximum one hour and eight noun predicted monoxide
concentrations were 7.5 parts per million (ppm) and 4.5 ppm,
respectively, which occurred at receptor 2 in 1987. The
concentrations do not exceed Florida Ambient Air Quality
.. - ,.. .-.._ • .iris .S;i�:�V'' ! yr'�" t ti''w�•� _' _..
s
_� -.. .. ._yam-«�...: w. � .....• '.�"r'��.r. •�;�V y .a,' •w{• ��_ +x�,
... _. .. .. .. • � • .. _ -:a;,,= t .-X'•�+.j�i•��`1t •` .y-i.JYl:�'�1�'S'. -C+ntY�C �.li�••4.4+ka�Vah+vh.ra-c!rr► �•,. +-'N�..�n.�.
.. .. .. .. . •• .. r. .. .._.. .•.. s. ,.. - .-. ,_ _ :'`: r�1i.'�"-•i�Ll.�7ti�:.. ..:'�fv�:1.�..w�• _. ..�. ... �'�::;e.'..a.:.ir.��,_ ��..: is �:.. .. �_ .. ... .'J .:.. ,
standards of 35 ppm and 9 ppm for for one hour and eight hour
carbon monoxide concentrations, respectively.
The impact of the Terremark project on ozone concentrations has
been raised by several citizen groups in Coconut Grove. Dade
County has been designated by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency as a "non -attainment" area for ozone because ozone
levels have exceeded National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) established by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970.
Ozone is a colorless irritant formed when emissions containing
hydrocarbons and other gases, primarily from motor vehicles,
bs;t also from other sources, react with sunlight. 1n Dade
County, it is estimated that approximately 73 percent of all
hydrocarbon emissions produced in 1980 came from mobile sources,
primarily highway vehicles. The remainder was generated by
stationary sources, such as utility installations and service
and manufacturing facilities, as well as natural blogenic
sources such as plants and trees.
A meterological phenomenon referred to as the " seabreeze
effect" produces high ozone concentrations In coastal areas.
Ozone precursors such as hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides
produced by motor vehicles and other•*sources are transported
offshore, usually in the morning. These gases then react with
16
., ..
9
I
f
sunlight and drift shoreward as ozone to the afternoon, under
the influence of an easterly wind.
The "seabreeze effect," as described above, is currently being
studied in both Dade and Broward counties through the use of
coastal ozone monitoring stations. Dade County now has coastal
monitoring stations on Virginia Key and at Haulover Beach, and
will have a third coastal station at Purdue Medical Center (SW
87tn Avenue and 81d Cutler Road) by the first quarter of 1985.
No violations or exceedances of the federal ozone standard have
been observed in Dade County since December, 19829 and the
County may be designated as an "attainment area" by mid-1985 If
sh there continue to be no exceedances of NAAQS for ozone. The
primary causes for the decreased concentrations are new vehicle
emission standards, bus improvements, MetroraiI* and other
transportation -related management strategies.
Since the additional vehicle trips generated by new
construction in the Region since December, 1982 have not caused
an increase -in' ozone concentration, vehicle trips generated by
the Terremark project should not cause a significant increase
in ozone levels in Dade County. An ozone monitoring station on
or adjacent to the Terremark site is not Justified and would be
of little or no benefit in monitor)ng the impact of
N
a •fir iR.��.i•—.L�i.pY .l.i•�•. :i; /. :�{... Lt:+. •��Y.�i��l-.. ...
Terremark-generated traffic because 1) two ozone monitoring
stations Iocated witnin five miles of the project are now or
41 will be in operation before Terremark construction begins ana
2) hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides produced by vehicles take 3
to 5 hours to react with sunlight to form ozone, therefore,
ozone produced by Terremark-generated vehicle trips would
rarely be detected near the Terremark site because of
prevai 1 ing winds.
Although significant adverse Impact on air quality will not
occur, the following actions by the Applicant would minimize
increases in carbon monoxide and other air pollutants from the
project:
4 designate five percent of employee parking spaces, locates
as close as possible to elevator or building entrances
(except for handicapped -designated spaces), for exclusive
car or van pool use.
• actively encourage and promote car and van pooling by
estabilshing a car pool Information program, and by offering
preferred parking spaces and work shifts to car and van
poo l or s.
4
' � ., r -fit .. •^!^,�sS.�.'y�.`:�:MMf�� .J �ji 1
,...: .r �. , �. r. ..+< `` .. .. ,,.yam,., w. .wr^� i, ....... �. ',.., ..•7�
•:ilY�+•a�wn-.w� ..wM•.:�•`a1.+L�. �•1t•S.'.+iNlfi+�"Ti +�ai`rw, .,•r.w.•w ,�1i�"�... ... .f.'Y'a ..... .,..-
1
...:1: • +...••� .•v.., . � ... 's �tY. ..; . ..u-; ^�•".'�a��'l+I;t,Y.•�:elaMw ' .•w.� n•w� � _,,,, ..,, ' • .+. i. 'i ' T'~
. - _ �>-.:.i�.r•` ._x.:a��. ,...... _`r..:........ .. � ..... . ,ira: = "�SCi►►•r. �a:...".. _ ._ �•�...... :1xah..�.r.:^.:iuc.S�s_i.:
• actively encourage and promote transit ridership by
providing regular shuttle service between the project and
the Coconut Grove Metrorail station.
• provide Metrobus, Metroraii, and shuttle service route and
schedule information in convenient locations throughout the
project.
2. Land, Flood Prone Areas, and Wetlands
The 3.3 acres of the project site are presently developed with
primarily low-rise residential structures. Approximately 8,500
cubic yards of material will be removed from the site as part
of site clearing.
The subsurface soil conditions were tested by the Applicant
this year. Generally; soil beneath the site consists of
sandstone witn sand and limerock.
According to the soil test engineering report, the subsurface
conditions of the site should pose no unusual limitations or
constraints to the proposed development. Pressure -injected
pilings will be used for construction of the tower and the
garage structure. Percolation was tested as + 5 minutes for 3
Inches of water.
19 /
V3
AIL
4
". .. ;,... JP_;
.:.ir wpr►.�i! Y '� ri d6+...r .�. _ id _ ... ..:. r !�4..l.N 4 -•�' i • , . _ r. .
. �_-.Y .�n.. �".1. :!r►J,•`a.�•�N.�e�„a.�,y2ii ys+'b•:a'ywr. •W.•` �� L.tY%ry..�I.RT'j^J1Za�♦'r'.y'w�''.r�++.�aiy.,a.�. �s`i^ ,�.�.. S,.r3. �::i. ..... .. .._
to
0
._.t...•.,:�.. .. ..,.`•i.:'a,c7:�4••l:iw•e1ii+�Mf`iC:.=':�Yl'(h:;�' �L•... _ �.:.:.:.r'�.��i71»'.3.:� .. t. Y
• actively encourage and promote transit ridership by
providing regular shuttle service between the project and
the Coconut Grove Metrorall station.
• provide Metrobus, Metrorail, and shuttle service route and
schedule information in convenient locations throughout the
project.
2. Land, Flood Prone Areas, and Wetlands
The 3.3 acres of the project site are presently developed with
primarily low-rise residential structures. Approximately 8,500
cubic yards of material will be removed from the site as part
of site clearing.
The subsurface soil conditions were tested by the Applicant
this year. Generally; soil beneath the site consists of
sandstone witn sand and limerock.
According to the soil test engineering report, the subsurface
conditions of the site should pose no unusual I imitations or
constraints to the proposed development. Pressure -injected
pilings will be used for construction of the tower and the
garage structure. Percolation was tested as + 5 minutes for 3
inches of water.
19
850-7Z.,
6-3
•AL_ _.__
i
M
If dust problems occur during land clearing or construction,
the Applicant proposes periodic sprinkling or wetting of the
40 subgrade surface. Erosion caused by overland flow of water
should be minimal because the site is graded relatively flat,
and the soil percolation rate is good.
The proposed development is located within three separate flood
i
I zones. The portion of the site located closest to Biscayne Bay
' is inside Zone A-14 of the Federal Insurance Administration
(FIA) Rate Maps for 100-year flood. The minimum required first
floor elevation for this area is 11.0 feet NGVD. The rest of
the project falls into Zone B (500-year flood) and Zone C (area
of minimal flooding potential). The Dade County 10-year storm
i flood criteria of 5.0 feet NGVD applies in Zones B and C.
The first floor of the office tower will be set at 12.0 feet
NGVD, one foot above the minimum• elevation required by the FIA.
Entrance to the parking level will be above 15.0 feet NGVD.
However, the actual floor elevation of the underground parking
will be three feet below the Dade County flood criteria of 5.0
feet NM for a 10-year storm. While the lower parking level
will be below County flood elevation, the entrance to the
garage will be at least 10 feet above the County 10-year storm
criteria. This elevation is outside the 100-year flood zone
and therefore little stormwater should enter the garage. A
- - 20
£x
:i �
0
submersible sump pump will be installed to remove washdown
water and stormwater that might enter the lower garage level.
Tne pump wi l i direct the water to a swale with a raised inlet
to provide overflow into the project drainage system, if
necessary.
3. Water, Drainage, and Hazardous Materials
The salt barrier line generally runs along Bayshore Drive,
therefore, the Aquifer east of Bayshore Drive is saline. The
entire Terremark site is within the 1,000 part per million
(ppm) chloride isochlor, which indicates that groundwater
beneatn the site is brackish to saline, although a shallow
freshwater lens may be present near the top of the Aquifer.
According to Dade County Department of Environmental Resource
Management, groundwater beneath the site should not be used for
human consumption or irrigation. There are no surface water
bodies on -site. Biscayne Bay, a State Aquatic Preserve, is
located less tnan one block east of the project site.
The existing drainage system on -site disposes of stormwater by
slab -covered trenches, infiltration through pervious areas, and
discharge to the adjacent roadways, which subsequently
discharge through the City storm sewers directly into Biscayne
-� Bay. Direct discharge tnto the Bay, without retention, is
ON
undesirable and no longer permitted for new drainage systems
2i
Q T
-+.-•.:.nZ•-•-. -,.. •t'y?M-'J't-�11!AM�•r .'�`� - •� r,•.. .yr. � �
r
�.. _ - . . ^•�' - �•.�.::.:... ''JNse.•a�•7+:r�r •r.w�lu![Y'�'i'. Y. C1 �'•t�1'j'd{.�}r�ky�i, y,.+t .Y~"r.t►Y,"��• _"�'y'u`�"` .. �`'� n "'•:tire.: . ... _ "'�.l•"�•'.,` ..
... .... .. ....w .�.!-�. ..Y'. ♦'wMF•ai-7nx ., i��: J.J.�+.wi .' ....�i�.-. .. •�l M-�+f•"� n. ♦.. .r .s - ...inw.w r. v.w�. a....-.. .. .. _. .. .. �trw�-- , ...•r .- - ..�- .
go
because nutrients and pollutants are transported by stormwater
runoff into the Bay.
The .proposed Terremark drainage system will be designed to
handle a 5-year storm event of unspecified duration, with an
Intensity of 6.2 inches per hour, as required by Dade County.
Estimated maximum runoff from this storm is 18.53 cubic feet
per second, while the drainage system has been designed with a
capacity of 31.2 cubic feet per second. Consequently, no
runoff from the design storm is expected to leave the site.
All runoff from roof and ground surfaces during the design
storm will be routed to sedimentation boxes. injection pumps
will then pump the runoff into one of four on -site drainage
wells which discharge into the lower saline levels of the
Biscayne Aquifer. The Applicant has proposed to route parking
garage washdown water, which contains more pollutants and is
more highly concentrated than runoff from other on-slte
Impervious surfaces, to a grassed swat a with a raised catch
basin. Because the operator can decide when the garages will
be washed down, overflow from the swale to the raised catch
basins should rarely, if ever, occur. All catch basins will be
designed to retain oil and grease before stormwater is routed
to sedimentation boxes and, subsequently, drainage wells.
E
6L
k
Table 3 shows the estimated pollutant loadings for the existing
and proposed developments. Existing loadings are based on
stormwater runoff disposal as follows: 70 percent of runoff to
slab -covered trenches, 20 percent by infiltration through
pervious surfaces, and 10 percent discharged into Biscayne Bay.
The loading rates for the existing development are from the
Broward County 208 multi -family category. Loading rates for
the proposed development (commercial)* were calculated based on
3.32 acres of impervious area plus 7.6 acres of parking area.
Allowing all parking garage washdown water to percolate through
a vegetated Swale will remove at least 90 percent of the
pollutants listed below.
TABLE 3
ESTIMATED POLLUTANT RUNAFF LOADS
(Pounds per Year)
Total Total Suspended
Nitrogen Pnospwrous BW Solids
Existing Devolopeent 26 1 53 704
Proposed Terreaark Center (no swele)• 02 7 502 5.e56
Proposed Terremark Center (with swele)• 23 2 140 1.645
e Tne loadings for the roof and other exposed surfaces were assueed to be
half of the com*rcial lording rate applied to the parking garage.
S01RCEs MA, SFRPC, Broverd 2001 Plan
The commercial loading rates used In Table 3 were taken from a USGS
study of a commercial development witn surface parking only. The
parking lot was open to settlement of suspended airborne pollutants
as well as introduction of fertilizers spread over landscaped islands.
Given the proposed parking garage at Terrem ark. nutrient and pollutant
loads will be lower than the estimates show. Fb wever$ the parking lot
used for the USGS study was vacuum swept three times a week, which may
compensate for part of the over-estimatiori described above.
23
_ V2
- • .. -- ..
i�
ON
.- •, -i �.:rY. � �„�,,:. •:;+!+.ham ..�'O"7 `•a:.tli � i :x�•.`4 • r ..,
.. _. ... <F•.. .. .� [ w��rrl �:�.X1'4n!!y�:l�'«�i�.t��.i::�iw'!.�,wt1.b"'�K.r'�+iei�:"1!:t.dw. _ .: •r.. .
The drainage system for the proposed Terremark Centre should
reduce the adverse impact of runoff from the site on water
quality in Biscayne Bay, because runoff from the site will no
longer be directly discharged to the Bay. By incorporating
grassed swales to cleanse parking garage washdown water, the
Impact of the project on ground and surface waters wi I I be more
favorable than comparable developments. To further reduce the
possibility of adverse impact on water quality, the parking
garage should be vacuum swept before every washdown. Finally,
the Applicant should reconstruct the drainage system for
Aviation Avenue, from South Bayshore Drive to Tigertail Avenue,
as part of the road Improvements described in Part iiI) below.
The new system should be designed to manage runoff from a
5-year storm by retaining the first 1.5 inches of runoff in
french drains, with overflow from the design storm runoff
discharging to Biscayne Bay. This type of system will retain
the most polluted first flush of runoff in french drains,
thereby preventing it from discharging to Biscayne Bay. If
french drains are not feasible because of underground utility
constraints, a drainage well system capable of managing the
5-year storm should be constructed. These improvements wi l l
reduce the Impact of stormwater runoff pollution in Biscayne
Say and complement the drainage improvements currently being
done by the City at the intersection of Tigertail and Aviation
Avenues.
24
85w- 2-
Another source of water pollution, potentially even more
harmful than stormwater runoff, is hazardous materials.
Hazardous waste is defined by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency and the State as waste that is ignitable, corrosive,
reactive, or toxic. Table 4 is a list of Standard industrial
Classification (SIC) codes for facilities that have been found
to produce one or more of the hazardous wastes listed in Table
5. These lists are excerpted from the Florida Water Quality
Assurance Act regulations, and all facilities that fall witnin
these SiC codes are required by the Act to provide information
regarding types and amounts of wastes generated at the facility
and how this waste is being managed.
Several of the SIC codes listed by the Applicant as potential
occupants of the Terremark project are included in the list of
potential hazardous waste generators in Table 4. For example,
research and development labs and photofinishing labs, which
are potential small quantity hazardous wastes generators, are
listed as potential occupants of Terremark. The Applicant has
proposed to cover loading areas to exclude rainwater, with
impervious floors (without drains) sloped towards catch basins '
or depressions for detention and clean up of spills.
Incorporation of the following additional measures as
conditions in any development order issued will further reduce
the possibility of Adverse impact on water quality:
25
031,
CNOMIOW" y,
TAULL 4 LIST OF POTENTIAL VARDOUS WASTE GENERARS 13Y SIG COUL
SIC 'Nowor ?voew SIC vasto types
code
11111-411 ACRIMTURE Itbl it soolifte and Shoot Metal Verb
fill) it Class and Closing worb
gigs AK term Its. I. WIT [groveling Red Foundation Verb 36
elll AMIC Cotten MI JILrUl Special lead* contractors
sell AK Tobacco
oils ADC guest crops 701?-3999! MANUFACTURING 1000STRICS
also a9c Vegetable and obles forms*
silo SK vorrop crops 201: Conned spoclolti*s
11111% CSC Cisres Trail Croolore 2091 Collate and Coated fish end Seafoods
$10I MIC Ornamental ressicallore 6 wormer/ Prodecto HIS L4 stood Woven fabric wills. Vogt
Mot AMIC CAMOT&I sense. prinerily Crop 7231 lMWmwas fell Length end were Nesiory
oill &K meet Cates* foadleto list t" mosiorg. escape Wourege Fool Length a sets, toast% i.
Otis M 90*1 Cattle. encept foodlets (*.I., leaches) aM Knit 061orweer llillv
9714 AK shear sea cost fares unit werecor wills
Otis Svc C*a*ret Livestock 2257 in Clecolor mail fabric wills
.4
10111 SICT Sail frepatstieft seralc 7:1#0 L4 Warp Knit Fabric mills
evil am crop pleasing. Colliveties. "W Protection 32%9 LIS moieties Wills. etc
*pit LOW Crop 11largetI prifterily by Nothint 2.161 in finishers of breadVowwo fabric$ of Cation
ilea 1 Cotten cinitifts 2262 tM riftishers of stood weve" Fabrics of 01an-Rate
0120 AT
Central Crop Services Fiber end Silb
MI A Livestock Services. escape services for Aninal 2269 L"t finishers of Stood love@* fabric*. Mon -Node, fbbtt
specialities and Sith
cult A too end Gordon sill in Woven Corrals and logo
01121 AT Greaftatel Shrub and Ito* Sittoiceg L" left@& Cotpet$ ORA meet
fill Lq Carpets and note. INC
2414 JKLY Wood Kitchen callieffe
WS ist? Mardemed Vassar soll plywood
*$go IUC Usbor tracts 2416 JKLI Softwood Woofer $84 plywood
Ogg! SIC III Moreffige a two* Sead Gotherins 6 U$I JIM Mobile News
Retracting M. JRLS F19186ficated WOW solidives and Components
Nsl ASCI forootrl services 2441 N Wood proservies
24,4! LTV particleboard lie
1611-1199: comsTminton ISO: JKLqT Vood Movettleld parallel*. oncept Vph*istvrrd
1514 OLOPQ Metal Nowsphold Furniture
Sall LpVR 11,111"s, oaf street Coselewtion My JIL41 Wood TV and Maio Cabinets
04 tiaosted vislevey Construction Isis JKLI111 NO09*46141 rwraileer. NEC
sill got IPIN"iel. Nestles (encept electric) and Air 2521 .191.141 Wood *141 Furniture Q,
Co"fitleftlas 2522 OL40P Metal office Forsiture
fill JRLT ftleties. Forer Nestles. em# Decorating. logo? 2541 JKLMI Wood Powtille"s and flatufas
Caftetroctise, etc JS4? Ntmorg metal particle"$ and fixturts
llal LT Terrelle, Uh, "I and ""#)It Ilow% 2411 L"FTT Irtr Mitts
list .111.1 floor Lerise and other I'leerwork. NEC 2621 L"Pty vapor 11611el, Incept Saildise paper 41,19
3611 L"FTV roperboard mills
2661 SLIP Paper Costing 004 1;1441fis t
3643 ILF loots. escape Tootil,evese
no It► bit -Cut paper 064 poperbeers a" Ceraboors
26t6 ILF proofed and ftl#04 Foop goodif
CA --4 2649 SLIP Consorted Paper ORA paperboard Presocose 11194,
• 14M UP palsies reparboara seats
2652 ILP III@c-ap, paperboard moves
Ad
IM lie Cocrosslod avid Solid Fiber son*#
Manaoserr has Ille" identified ge a ",014611 generator of belordeve woo
eel
caressive. reactive. 18"itable.
0",Ioo *"so wwoo. Pat ellm*lqpo SIC 98010 Wool, sell preparative Services. e;�liputiol generator of t"ie p0olicide vatI tech SIC code listed in
vroolovels, be" 40conented
of hever4swe lveac*y io elk- literature as a r2testial
U
In
PC
cede
Waste types
Deocripties
a ISU
1L►T
Senftary ►ons eostsise►•
20t
it"
fibee case, Tubes. Owes. and Similar products
1641
LHPTT
Building paper sod edildins Beard Hills
pill
NILI"
Newspapers: Pe►liehims and Printing
fill
111LMQ
Periodicals. publishing S printing
'till
sluwQ
Boots: Publishing sad printing
sell
NILOPQ
Beek printing
MI
OILOPQ
commercial rristles. Letterpress and Screen
list
RILA►Q
Commercial relating. Lithographic
11111
site"
Iegrevies and Plate Printing
flit
MILe"
Cocwreiat relating. Gravmce
2961
MILOPQ
manifold sesiseem terse
I1f1
UWpO
Greeting Card publishing
Still
ISLO►Q
Ntemtteels, Loaseloof oimdefs..aed Devices
.2feo
MTLO►Q
Dostbiudims and Belated Mert
11e1
NILOPQ
Typesetting
felt
•
Alkalies sod Marine
20S
rM
lmargeeic ►igmente
Less
►er"ST
Imdostrisl Inorganic chemicals. NEC
tell
Lion
plastics. Natarials. Synthetic Resins. owed
Men-omleamitable Ilaatomers
fell
LHTT
synthetic sobber
1821
LXF1
Cellulosic men -Node Fibers
Ie26
MY
synthetic organic Fibers, escort Cellulosic
Sell
Biological pcodette
less
Hedicinsts sod seteaicole
tots,
it
Phareacoaticai Preparations
29LI
►LIM
soap and other Detersests, stcept Speciality
Cleaners
2842
ALMM
spatielty clamors, hlistes. and sealtation
preparation@
!Bi]
INf1T
Borfoce Active Assets, Finishing Agents.
selfamstod Oils. and Assistants
2044
PLR '•
hrfstoes, cosmetics. and other Toilet Preparations
lost
PCUNT
taunt and Allied Products
1e61
LM►TT
com sad flood chemicals
IR61
t
Cyclic (coal Tor) Crudes. me cyclic Intermediates.
oyes, and organic Pigments ILstes and Toners)
fsgl
WIN
Isdestriol orgsoic chemicals. NEC
1173
Nitragesiv o ►artillsors
lacy
ASCLNT
Pesticide and Agricultural Chemicals. NEC
:loot
Adhesives and Sealants
loot
tmptoa Ives
tots
!CLIP
Ptiatiws tat
0I
BJtDpTT
Chemical preparations
1
T
Petretsom Refilling
t
T
Asptott Waite Mad coatings
T
INS( icatiss olio sad 6reastM
T
Predecto of ►etroleum opts Caste MM
•
JIM
miaetilomewo Plastic Products
1
s
Leather leftist and finishing
sic tit 039914here
classified
1
40
sic
waste Types
Description
Code
)III
L
wets S Shot Cal Stock 6 Findings
)ISI
L
Leather Cloves 6 miltres
3164
L
law s's footwear. except Athletic
3161
L
Lugsage
3111
L
Moers's Ness►ass S purses
)III
L
Personal Leothrr Goods
3199
L
Leather Goods. NEC
1211
FT
Flat Glees
MI
JRL
Britt and strecteral Clay trio
):S1
JRL
Ceramic Mall end floor Tile
11S1
JKL
witreoae China Plumbing iiaty/es and 1160raofv
Accesseries
1200
JsL
Mittens China Tables ass Kitchen Articles
1:4)
JRL
Visa earthenware (Mhitewarrl Table 6 Kitchen
Articles
32S4
it.
Porcelain electrical Supplies
):tit
JRL
Postal? Ptodacts. sic
3201
]
Abrasive ►rodvcle
1291
It
Gaslirts. pecking and Softies Devices
3112
Y
start Furnace$. Steel Morb$. and Rollimp Mills
))1)
Y
electroweellurtical Predates
311%
T
steel Mire Drawing and Steel wall* and Spites
1114
T
Cold soiled Scott sheet. strip. and Bar$
)III
T
Steel pipe and Tabus
)):I
T
Cray Iron Foundries
112.
T
11411eshit Iron roasdries
31'S
T
Steel foundries. NEC
3112
T
primary Smelting and Relining of trod
))))
T
priwary smelting and $Miming of Zinc
1)):
T
Primary ►rodection of 41wminam
311e
T
Primary smelting and Refining of Monferreas
metals. NEC
33:1
T
seeendery Saeitins end Refining of Nonferr.rwv
metole
3351
Nt?IOpQT
Rolling, staving and tatrvdisg at Copper
3351
NLMO►QY
Aluminum Sheet, plate and Foil
1)S4
NL"PPQY
Alwaisvo sotraded products
3)Ss
NLmOPQY
Alamimam Rolling and Drawing. NEC
31$6
NLIMPQT
Rolling. Drawing and entrodces of Noelsrraas
Hetal, Incept Copper sold Alwminuo
3151
NLM?QT
growing mod Ewevieting of Naolerfews Wire
3361
T
Aluminum Foundries lcsotioge)
33b:
T
•fees. Bran'e. Copper and moppet lase Allo•
Foundries
3369
T
11"frrreus ►eoedries ttestlmgs). NEC
3344
NLMOM
Metal Nee& Trestles
)399
ELM?Qi
Priseey metal Ptodotts. NeC
3411
NL"DPQT
Metal Come
3412
NLr1OPQ1
metal Shipping Dorrels. sews. Res'. end ►oils
loam Reliniahing) .
31611
HLnOPQ
Cutlery
4j
tit Waste Trots Deeeti►tiea Sic Waste types Oescriptiaw
Celt Code
3413 Ntol"
1411
mLNDPQ
1612
Nl1NPPQT
1617
NLMDPQT
VA
76A2
3443
3444
3446
1#4i9
lit s!
K)i
3451
U61
1465
11460
)ill
2Nt
Kt►
I�S9
)S11
IS19
ISti
MI
)SIP
)sII
13)1
Ili/
Jul
)Sii
Know
pula T
NLMOPQT
NtMOPQT
IILe101QT
#tleOPQT
NutopQT
Ip110►pf
NUtDPQI
Nusom
NI.0"Im
aunt"
NUIDpQ
NIMM
NLNOM
NDWO
NLP1DIPQT
IILNDFQT
NLMOPQT
NutD►Q
N MPW
emorw
NLMDrQT
Nuto►Qr
KMM
NtMWW
amp"
Nut m
am"T
/iJmm
mlrl M
WAMOPQT
New/ a" Use Tells. Retort Ilachint Toole end
good Sere
New! Saw 6 Saw sladts
Nsr/ware. NEC
tasseled Iron aad metal Seellary, Were
pleabims riaterr wittiest ad Trio (Steel Goods)
Ntetiss 1401pmeat. tacept tlecttic an/ Veto Air
►ernatee
►abtlested Structural Notes
motel risers. Seek. #tows. Noldiep. end Trio%%
►o►ticated visit Werh
Skeet Notes Woth
Architectures man Orsawatsl metal Wor►
prefabricated Metal swildings and Components
Miscallaaeewe Metal work
Screw mschiwe vrolects
Setts. Nuts. screws. Aivett. and Washes
less axa Steel reeling$
Avteetetive Steeping•
Notes stam►iass. NEC
electroplating. veliahiss. violist. Assailing.
and Coloring
Casting, tesreviss. sad Allied Services. MCC
Small Anus Awawaition
Animosities. accept for small Area, NEC
Ordnance and Accessories. etc
Steam. Caa. and Nydrawlic Turbines
Interest Cosbettiow tusines. etc
rare Machinery led Igwi►uest
Cordes Trotters 6 Lowe 6 Cordon Equipmeat
Construction Nochisery and 11461reent
Nixing msehisary and tgsipmtst. except Oil Meld
Oil field Nochiwory sea tgeirwat
Conveyor. miss Conveying tgei►seat
Industries Tucks. Tractors. Trailers. and
stockers
Verities Toole, Notai Cettlat
moc%ioe Toole. Notes vormius
Special Was me Toole. Die seta. Tina and
►istures, end Industrial "also
Nothing Tool Accessories 6 Ileasarlst Devices
►aver Drives Nana Teals
N*tal Werhims Nackiwery. etc
feaa hoiocts Machinery
Textile Netkistry
Wemawerbims machinery
Vapor Industries Nechlstry
Prialist Trades Nockisary and Iituipueat
Species lsdestty Nechietry. NEC
peeps and pumping Igwipmeat
Soli sea toilet Sesriats
'HOC • Seat elsouhere slaesitied
1S61
Ompe
SS6i
PL40►Q
I561
HL"O►Q1
1161
NLNO►QY
1S69
NLHnPQt
M I S
NInOPQ
151.
ML'IOPQ
1S1•
NLMOPQ
sSS;
NL'I(PPQT
)S/S NLMPrQ
NLHOPQ
NmPQ
NLMO/QT
NL9nPQY
Nt4OPQT
NLnnPQ
III.MO►Q
NL'IOPQ
HLMOPQ
NL40►Q
NL40PQ
NL'MPQ
NLMOPQ
HLMOPQ
NL40PQ
NL'10PQ
HLNOPQ
NLMOPQ
NL40PQ
36161
NLHO►Q
)0I
NL4ppQ
SO.,
NLMO►Q
166,
NLND/Q
1616
NLMOPQ
9615
NLHOPQ
1611
NLMOPQT
1614
NLMOPQ
1611
N►Q4
1612
NPQ
3111
1114
NLNOp"
)11•
Nt"pQ
Ms
NLMOPQ
3126
NLMOPQT
1124
NLNOPQT
Air spa Cal Compressors
Rlover and tsheuel vensilolia trope
Industries process ?Senate 6 **one
H?chonicol power Transmission t9wipwent. NIC
Central Industrial Plotkin*?? and tluipmooll. Mtr
tltettenit Co+pvtiwR t1•iipmewt
CalcvlatinS 6 Accounting Machines. oncepl
tivelrowit tluipmrnt
Office Nockines. NIC
Commercial Laundry. Dry Clesains. and pressing
Machines
Air Conditiomiag mad Warn Air NastinR tlwipm*nt
and Commercial and Industrial Refrigeration
Equipment
11046arins mad Dispensing Poops
ter•ice Industry Plotkin#*. RIC
Carbveoloes. Piston*. piston Sings 6 Velut%
Machinery. Incept tltctrical. etc
Power. Oistri►wtia and Specialty Traneforave•
Switchator and Switchboard Apparatus
linters 6 Generators
Industrial Controls
Welding Apparatus. electric
Carbon 6 Graphite products
tlectrical Industrial Appera/se. etc
Household setri=orators and now and fart( meters
Electric Nowsevarts and real
Soviet Machines
Household Appliances, NIC
Electric Leave
Cwtrent-Corryisg Wirt Devices
Rreidrntiel Electric Lightias ►iateres
Commercial, industrial. and Institution,
Lighting rixteres
Vthicwiar Lighting tquipdwnt
Radio 6 Television Receiving sets
ftonosrapk Rtca►/s end Pre-roceraod Magnetic Tape
Radio end Television Transmitting. Sisaolias. and
Detectiew tquipuent and Apparatus
somicendeeters and Relst*d Devices
tlectronic Capacitors
Electronic Coils. Treaslorsuto, end Other inductors
tlectraie Components. NEC
Storage batteries
primary Retteties. Dry aad Wet
Motor Vohiciee and pasetagor Car Slits
motor Vehicle Facts sod Accessories
Hater homes
Aircraft
Airctofl collate a" tapiat Parts
Aircraft parts and Availiery tgwipvel . MC
i
4
l
T
SIC
waste Two
Description
s
Sit
Code
Waste Types
Description
IUMMY
ship ouladiess Wed UfAiring
Air Transportation. Certificated Carriers
Airports riving
Rest swildiess sea sepairing
scientific. Laboratory Sad Research
•4$83
LTY
end yields
Airport Ter"inal Services
Kagiftseries.
4611
JILPTY
petroleum Fire times
IRII
sum"
lwateuwrwtsCretelf
AvIvsatic Controls for stgulatifts Residential 004
4611
40619
iatrtr
JKLPT
Weasel Petroleum Pope Lines
Pipe Liars. NEC
III
IRUIWQ
commercial tavirenwewta and Appliances
l"Wertial to Waisaurine. Display. and
stromweete to
4811
LT
Telephone Communication (Wire of ladle,
Central of Process Variables. and Related
ill:
493)
LT
LT
Radio greseltestivill
Television
Product@
staselcaltims
161alitios Field Metere sea Camotlas O"Ices
4911
4911
1
T
Electric Services
Elvelfical a Other services
lostrawate for MossorifiB and tooting of
49):
T
Gas 6 Other stroicce
Is"
NLNOPQ
Itloctricla? sea Electric signsle
Measuring Sad Costrollifts Devices. NEC
41919
44s)
T
T
Combination Utilities. NEC
Sewerage
3231
ULIHOPQ
Optical Instruments sod Leases
4953
systems
art"** Systems
3161
RUMP9
Surgical and medical lestrameate and Apparatus
Utoical Appliances
49$9
AM
Sanitary Servicesetc
,
WE
WAXOPQ
Orthopedics prosthetics god
3043
IMAM
sod Supplies
%also aquip"est Sod Supplies
$093-5196: %imtsAtt JUDE
11S11
3161
alimpl)
NMPQ
Ovebtlealftic cows
Photographic Equipment sod Supplies
1001
T
Scrap 8 waste, keterists. Whatteelf
3911
111MOPQ
vatches, Cloth$. etc.
$161
$ill
LPTY
Chemicals sad Allied products Uhalessit
3911
WROW.
Jewelry. Froclove metal
5198
A
JKLT
fare Supplies
taints, Varnishes, and Supplies
3914
sworgi
Silverware. Plated Were. sod stainless steel Were
Ills
NJLMPQ
Jeweler's findings a materials a Lopidail Work
5711-S914: ICTAIL TRADE
1961
Hiat"Orl;
Coolant jsWelry sad coolant Novelties. except
3M
UJIMMOPQ
testimas Netal
Needles. time. Nooks, sod *yaw, sod Similar
$.Ill
JKLT
leolls#. Class. sad Wallpaper stores
Nations
512si
Aitt
Nordware stores
2913
oligum"
Hou and Adoettisial Displays
5:11
Sill
JKLP
Aliltt
mobil* JIM* Dedlere
Department stores
lots
1990
DjXLMPQ
NJKLXDPQTT
serial caskets
ladeettise
$399
AIM
Hoscellenteas central Merchandise Stsr#$
4
►
4911-4959: TRANSPORTATION AND P1151.1c 911LITIES
$511
LrJT
later Vehicle Dealers (New a Used)
W1
LM
motor Vehicle Dealers (Used Onlyl
4911
Att"
Ifillemads, Lime -Noel Operatives
$531
15.41
LPW
Auto 4 Name Supply Starts
4111
WIT
Local sad Suburban transit
MI
LPWT
LPWT
Gasoline Service Stations. retail
Book Dealers
4019
JKLTT
saltebifts a Urmisial eatabiiaherrvete
$511
LM
motorcycle Doultfs
46119
WIT
Local Possessor Transportation. NEC
SS99
LFUT
Automotive Desloge. KC
4111
Ull
L"rr
LIMY
losicabs
latercitp gas total als%way Possessor
Mt
Nommelsold Appliance States. retail
lreseepartaties
$962
LT
Awtometic Itercles"disifts "&Chile* operate?*
4111
LWf
$982
T
Feet a Ice Dealers
sill
IF
Maintewawee a tagwite jPullitles fair Motor Vehicle
5993
5904
T
1
pool Oil Dealer*
Liquefied retraillem Cos Dealers
AM
possessor transportation
72IS-11091. "S INDUSTRIES
JILMI
SADC&I trucking without $lot&&*
its
I14
(bRLPWTtL
j
i"IT
trucking, except Local
Local Trucking wit% Stores*11
Isis
L"
Coils Operated Laundries and try Clowning
note
Iffestbives Termiffial Pacilitied
7311
inLH
Loy clasalas Plants. Except son Clowning
Ill
JKLMY
D.S. postal $*evil& (vehicle notatessect 08171
Carpet sod Upholstery,
sal
Dear Sea Persian transportation
Marine
ills
7161
L"
LT
Industrial Lovedersto
Ventral Service* and Crematories
last
JRLWI
Cargo R811411"s
Water Trameportetieft s4pfvlc*o. NEC
7112
IJKLT
Outdoor Advertising Services
1" a" Statesboro
e1loselfled
sit
waste Typvo
Description
two
lilt
sit
u.ertiolas, plc
fill
In
siroct Nail advertioims services
1311
LOT
siwpriat sea photocopying Service*
till
LDT
Commercial photography Art. a" Crophit*
flat
ACM
sisiofecting sea tatermisaties services
titre
PAT
Clamming Sad %siatessace services to Owelliess
sea Other saildiess. IMC
Tlgl
LFT
seseareh and Sevelopwat Laboratories
llH
*Mgt
pMtofiwiahiwt .Laberatoria*
I"?
LFT
Commercial Testing Lahorstetie*
flog
►ire tatio=eioher Charging service•
lilt .
LMf
puaestor Car Rental Sad Lessiss. aitheet
Drives
tsl!
L"T
TruthRental oat Lassies. without •rlvore
»tt
LM
stilitf Trailer sod secreatioaat fthitte Rental
Islt
LM
top and Rode Ropeir $hope. Automotive
ISM
LM
Tire RetreNiss sal strait shops. Automotive
Isis
L/w
Foist shape, aetemotive
lilt
L"IT
Control Astamotive Repeif bops
file
LWY
Automotive Repair shops. RFC
1612
Lpt
Radio a Television Repair $hope
1611
LFT
Refrigeration, a air eon/itiseies service a
strait shops
tilt
art
tlectfical a tlettrssic repair shops. Nte
MI
LT
watch. Cloth. *ad Jewelry tepair
iKi
J[LT
Reopholstery sad Furniture Repair
frog
LFW
weldist Repair
1694
LT
Armature Rewiodlat shove
1699
LT
Repair shops sad Rtlated services. SIC
(iscludiss Tatideruiate)
veto
LOT
service* Allies to Notion Fitter* Predectioa
felt
JRLT
Theatrical Fredot re (tae*pt lotion pictures) and
Miscellaneous Theatrical service•
Ittl
aft
public Cell Coors**
t!!1
Lpt
Coin-Opersted Asuooarst Device@
ltN
JRLPT
Ameseasat Parke
flee
&M
Amu*emeat sea Recrootion servicess plc
90111
L►T
•Ceserai medical and surgical Rospitals
Dag
Let
specialty poapitele. ance►t Psychiatric
sell
LFT
Nadicel-Loberateries
s01t
LIP?
Dastel Laboratories
not
LFt
Oetpotlent Care Facilities
alai-s]ll: tbl►CATtONAL $tRWittt
alll
JRLFT
gemeatory sea secondary school*
Mil
J$LFt
Caii*ge*. Daiversities. ►tofessionei schools.
aN Joala► College•
JKLM
Vocational schools. aaeept Voestionei sithsebeole,
CRC
ll
�T
school* and tdwcollosel services.1KC4-il
JILT
Job Training and Tototissal teh*hilitstles services
MIC !pat ltawher: slassl f id
i
sic Vogt# types Description
Code
$411-0999: NIICtLLAMOUS
1411 PUT MY**vm* end Are Callerieo
8411 ADC Arboreta. setasicol and zoological Card***
1922 LFT Noncommercial tducational. scientific. and
Rt*earth Orsaniestions
8999 it services. Rte
.10
0"M
ft
TABLE 5
CODE FOR WASTE TYPES C"ONLY ASSOCIATED WITH EACH SIC MUSTPy
A
Waste'peaticides
I
Washing and rinsing solutions containing pesticides
C
Empty pesticide containers
D
Spent toxaphene solutions or sludges from dipping
Spent pesticide solutions or sludges other than tozaphene fror.
dipping
T
Dust containing heavy metals
G
Washings and rinsing solutions containing heavy metals
N
Wastewater treatment sludges containing heavy metals
I
Waste ink
Ignitable point wastes containing flammable solvents (flash point
less than 140*T)
K
Liquid paint wastes containing heavy metals (cadmium, chromium,
mercury or load)
L
Spent solvents
M
Still bottoms from the distillation of solvents
N
Filtration residues from dry cleaning operations
0
Cyanide wastes
?
Strongly acidic or alkaline wastes
Q
Spent plating wastes
R
Waste ammonia
S
Photographic wastes
7
Ignitable wastes (flash point less than 140*F)
U
Wastewater sludges containing'pentachlorophenol, creosote, or
arsenic
V
West* formaldehyde
W
Lead acid batteries
X
waste explosives
y
Waste oil
2
Other
W,
• `�� -I� �.. .. °>•sSa�"�"�'irr'M.v' .r_"i �'�J�'K�%:+�C'c..•1•"�4t"'.y,.:.
. c.:r+x:.. s •x. 4
e construction of impervious floors, without drains, to hold
for cleanup, all spills in those areas within a facility
where hazardous materials wi l l be stored, displayed, used,
or handled;
e all hazardous substances disposed of via a hazardous waste
disposal service meeting DER requirements; and
e documentation of appropriate disposal of hazardous waste by
each hazardous waste generator.
4. Vegetation and Wildlife
A survey of existing vegetation on -site performed by the
Applicant shows that 88 individual trees and plants exist on
the property. According to the Applicant, seventeen of these
will remain on -site, tb will be relocated within the City, and
55 wi i I probably be destroyed. Those plants being destroyed
are either undesirable species or growing In rock, making
transplanting difficult or impossible. The Applicant should
consult with, and follow the recommendations of, the Dade
County urban Forester concerning the transplanting of trees. A
City Site Clearance and Tres Relocation/Removal Permit must be
obtained by the developer prior to clearing.
32
t
6
.rA :.•.y.1 y't �M 1•• w '•may �,.
j.tiF�M..�. • :` �....i•.aw.:._r�.i�..+�•.�L•w:'A�iy,n.iW ��w. .r�:t �• :.:�. ,.. Ci_ :�.�:♦'w .Ja. n .._- .._ •' .
4
— V
-- ri-�:r.`w,►:,n�.i'•a�'-_.�a;�.u�uas'u..
. ___.._.::.:•r!:��.Yt::�t.+i'' �'=as..a:crz�Zs:a�:�:":�::':',.�s
�,. . _,.._. _ a�' �...� .... ........ .... _ .....,.-
An i y non-poisonous non-invasive species that are adapted to
Soutn Florida climatic conditions, as Identified in Table 6,
04 should be used in project landscaping, and all undesirable
exotics currently on -site should be removed. (Pittosporum
Tobira is subject to pests and should be deleted from the
I andscape plan) .
There were no animals seen nor evidence of burrows, nestings,
or other indications of wildlife residence on the property
during a survey by the Applicant. No adverse Impact on
wildlife or wildlife habitats is expected, except for the
removal and relocation of trees during site clearing.
5. Historical and Archaeological Sites
The project site does not contain any known historic sites or
archaeological artifadts, according to the State Master Site
file and the Dace County archaeologist. The Dade County
archaeologist will monitor the construction to record or remove
any archaeological features, artifacts, or data that might be
uncovered. The Applicant should provide access to
archaeologists monitoring the site and delay construction, If
necessary, in that portion of the site being surveyedo, should
any artifacts be discovered.
33
TALE 6
It"Me"D FLAW SPECIES
Trs*s
Acacia surteulastorialse (Eerleet *cocoa)
Acacia cyanophyl10 ileach aced*)
Acacia faraeslaes (Swat acaclal
Achras Septa IS*podillal
Acoslorrhaphs urlghtli (Psurotls polo. Caps sebei polo)
Arecastnw roaenzotflamame (Queen pals)
Avicesnla gsrmlaass Iolade Mangrove)
OsMlela spp.e forebid tress)
lressals actinophylls ISehetflers)
I)uelds bueersss (Slade of Iva)
snare shsrrbe Combo Ilimbo)
Moe capitats 1101sdo palm)
Cailiandre hassefocloals tPouderpuft)
CeIllstason rlolduse (Erect bottlebrush)
Celilstaaon spp.s (tbttiabrush)
Canal to wisferaas IMlld einnason)
Cessis fistulvP Illoiden shower)
Ceiba pemiandre (Ceiba)
Cb msedoM spp. (li us"Id palms)
Choosers" huulllise (European fen palm)
Chorlsle specloss (floss silk treat
Chryselidocarpus lutesconse (Ares pals. Medogescor peiml
Chrysophyllus ollvlforms (Satlnleafi
Citrus surantlfolles May Ila*$
Citrus persdisle (Mlamols Tengelol
Citrus reticulefee IMlnneola Tangelo)
Clusla roses (Pitch apple).
Coccolobs dlverslfolle (Pigeon phial
Coccolobs grandiflore (1319 leaf see grape)
Coccolobs uvifere ISss greps)
Coccofhrinm argentate (Florida sliver palm)
Cochlospermus vitlfioifun (Outtercup tree)
Cocos nuclters "May pines (May pan coconut palm)
Conocarpus erectus 18uttoeuood)
Conocarpus srsctus "serlcea" ISllver buttonwood)
Gordis sebastans (Gslger tree)
Delbergls slssoo (India Rosewood• Slssol
Delonix regime (Royal poinclens)
Drypetes lateriflore (Guiana plus)
Erlobotrys Japonicas (Loquatl
Eryfhina crlsf"allile (Cockspur coral -creel
Eugenia axtliaris 1Nhlte stoppers)
Eugenia confuse Mad stoppers)
Eugenia foetlds ISpsnish stoppers)
Focus cltritolle (Short leaf fig)
r-
f
,� i�•�i•4r, ��i
K
f ,' i4
� t
�• i� ti••t,'
t is � `'. �'. i ,1•'
� t
'r
it
it
t.'
3
Grevll)ss banks)) 19001ts grsvllisai
Growl Ilea roeesto (Silk osk)
very large free, not for residential use.
8uslacm sanctum (Ugnus-vitae)
Miblocus flllecous (See hibiscus, Hlblscus tros. Mahoe)
) Iex casslM (DW F, F, belly)
Jecoranda scuttiollse (Jecarendal
Junlporus slllicicole (Southern red cedar)
KoNreuterls formassnae (Golden rain-trool
KruglodwWron ferrous 181eck Ironwood)
Logerstroonla Indicss (Crspo-Ilrrtiol
Loguhcularls ragemoso (White sanprovs)
Licari* triandre fault llcarla)
Licusla grandisa 11.1041e palm)
Lysiloss behsmeesis (Wild famorind)
Lystiome istisllqus (Mild tamarind)
Msntikare behsmaasls Wild dilly)
Mmst#chodend►on foetidlssisu s (Mmstic)
ilusa bybrldse (demons)
Mrrlcs cor'ifere (Southern wax myrtle)
Porklasonle sarleatam (Joresalon thorn)
Peltsphorum Insrsae (yellow polnelans)
Pines Clause ISWW pins)
Pines f111011 (Slash plas)
-PIP" shim#)) ver. earlbee (Rove flash pine)
to
Plnelord erects
viscift plseipatip [Jams)
9
Plsonls longlfolie (8loilyl
Pithecalloblus dulcee (Catfs claw free, Manllis tamarind)
Plumtris spp.e (frangipani)
Poinciana pulchsrrims Mverf polnelenal
Pssudophoenix sargentii (Florida cherry pals)
Ptychosperss slogans (Seefrothla polo)
Ptychosperos nocerthurli )MacArthur pals)
quercus virpinlns (live oaks
Nhl=ophors oengle (Red mengrove)
Roystonso slats (Novel pals)
Roystones rogla (Cuban royal pals)
Sabel palmetto (Cabbage polo)
Serene repens (Saw palmetto)
Slssroube glauce (Paradise tree#
Sophora Japonlcoe (Japanese pagoda treat &
Spathodee campanultae (African tulip tree# ;
Swlotonia mahogani !Nest Indlas Mol"anyl ;
Tabobuls argenteaa (Tree of gold)
Tabsbula pailldae (Pink trumpet tree) r.s
Tamarledus Indleas (India Tamarind)
Teroinells catepps (Tropical sloond)�
;a•
Z�
Taxodlum (CWess#
Thaspesla populasse.(Port Is troe# seaside ma osl
Thrinsc oorrlsli (Keys thatch pslol
ThrinaK redlafe (florlds thatch Palo)
Thrinm sepp. (Thatch palm)
Washington robust• flleshington palm)
KETt a Exotic speclas
t
t
.t
0."
r
�a
•t'y �,l
,5:,
F � r',
is
is • � j':.` -
,'
,�{..
•�; ,�
i
lirevllles bo*sll (Banks grevilles)
Gravllles rabusts ISilk oak)
Wry large tree, not for residential use.
Qualecum sanctux (Lignuw-wltse)
Hibiscus 4111sceus (Sea hibiscus. Hibiscus tree. !!shoe$
114x cassine (Oahoon holly)
decaranda scutllolise (Jacerandat
Juniparus silllelcols (Southern red eedu)
Koelrewterle foomesmes (Golden roln•free)
KruglodenQron furrows (Black ironwood)
Legerstroamis Indices ICrepa-Myrtles
Lag cularls ragamoss (wits mangrovel
Licarle trlmdro IGulf Ilcarla)
Licusle grandlew (Llcusle palm)
LTsliams bahaxensls (Mild twoarlod)
Lysilams latisll" (Mild tamarind)
Maailkere bM mansis (Mild dilly)
Msstlehodendroa, footldisslmos (Msstiei
lbse kgbrldss (Baum)
Myrles cerlfere (Southern ran myrtle)
Parklnsonle seuleatO (Jerusalem thorn)
Pelfophorwo harms* (Yellow poinelma)
Plows clause ISand pone)
Pious e1110t11 ISlssh pine)
,Plows eillotll var. carob" (Kays slash pinel
Nj Pinelerd arecls
Pisclds PlseipdM U malce dogwood)
9
Plsonlo longlfolls (Blollyl
Pithecelloblum dulcas Mat's claw tree. Manilla tamarind)
Plumarle spp.s IFrmglpml)
Polnclene pulcharrlma (Over! poloclane)
PseudophomIx sargentll (Florida cherry polo)
Ptychosporme elegans (Seafrothis palm$
Ptychosperme mecarthurII (MacArthur palm)
Quercus virginlna (Live oak!
Rhltophors Mangle (Red sengrovel
Rorstonas *lots IRoysl polo)
Roystones rogle (Cuban royal palm)
Sabal palmetto (Cabbage palm)
Sermos spans ISar palmetto)
Slmaroubs glauce (Paradise free)
Sophors Japonicas (Japanese pagoda free)
Spethodeo eeompanul4ss 1-1—tulip free)
Swletenle madam /Mast Indies mehogenyl '
Tabebule argenteas (Tree of gold$
t;
Tababola pal IIdea (Pink trumpet tree) x.b
Tamerindus Indices (Indle Tamarind)
Terminella cateppe (Tropical almond$
1.
Texodlnw IOrpresst
Thespests populaaas.(Portla trees seaside melee)
Thrinex morrlsli (Keys *hatch palml
Thrinex redlata (Florida thatch palm$
Thrinme sapp. IThateh palml
Washington robusta (Washington polo)
KEyi 6 Exotic spades
z
I
m
CA
Shrubs, Vines, and Ground Covers
3: •
Acelyphs hlspldee (Chenille plant)
Eugenie confuse (Red stopper$
f
Acelypha vllkeslanae (Copparteall
Eugenie foetid• (Spanish stopper)
Alpinia spp. !Shell flower)
Eugenia unifloref (Surinam cherry)
,
;� •:;
Aeoniame (Torch Ginger)
Forestlere segregate (Florida privet)r
Antlgonoe Iptopuse (Corel vine)
GerdMls jeselnoldese (Gardenia$
Ardisle Crenate (Corlsfwas berry)
Cueplre discolor 181o11y1
Aspergus spp. (Aspergus fern$
Hameile peters (Scerletbush. firebush)
9egonle spp! (Mx begonia)
lbdychlcw coronertuw (f)ufterfly filly)
rosonlas luclds (locustberr
� Y)
Hdythtuw tteNcw )Yellow Illly$
Catitendre heemsfoc ale (PowderPclt)
fMdychiuw geronertenum tKahlll silly)
_•� -. •.
Cailicarpe amerlcana (American beautybush)
ftad hfum yc spp. (Ginger filly)
• j:=
Cwps Pe
Is redicanse (Trues t vine)
Hellenthus dlbllits (Basch sunflower$
k,
Cass$• spp! (Castle)
Hibiscus rose-slnonsise IHlbiscus)
Cassia Dehesarsise ideate)
Itpenocallis Istlfollae (Splder Illlyl
,; r ,•;�
Chrysobolanue Icaoo ((oeoplua)
$lox glabrae Wee lberry)
• Cladlcrm (sawgress)
Ileac vaelforle ranee (Overt yeupon holly)
Oodlascw varlagNuee (Croton)
Ipawoes op. tlbrning glories, rellroed vine)
;� ';;;•.
(bcwcerps eroctus (Green butfoneood)
More ooulneee More)
`
.
Oonoeerpus areetus serteeus (Silver buttonwood)
Ixora ceeerothyrsa (lbleY Ixora)
�
�• -
Conocerpus erectus serocous (Sliver buttonwood$
Jesmine ewltiftorua (Downy jeselne)
=•.' .
Costae spp. (Spiral flag)
Jetrophe eulttfidea (Peregrins)
flodwams viscose (Varnish I"f)
Junlperus chlnensis colusmarlse (Junipers)
t
BCOW" vellickit (Pink bell$
Junlperus conferfee (Shore Juniper)
E • r. '
Ersntheaus aervosuwe (Blue sage)
Legerstroemla Indite• (Crepe-ityrtles
Edsente eoctllerls (Mate stopper$
aim Mmplr
tontons deprosse (Wert lentena)
Lioustrum app! (Privet)
Urtops ouscortf (Lilly turf)
fbrrep pemlculetM ((beige jasmine)
flfrclanthas frogrons (Slapson stopper$
llyrclorlo cooliflorae Usboticabal
pales corifore ISouthers wex oyrtie. Beyberryl
"blopogon japoatcuse IMM40 grass)
Popgramle obtustlot I* tPaperoala)
Petres volubtltsm l9ween9s wreath)
Phoeamerls speciosel (torch gingerl
Philodendron spp.e (self heading phtlodandrun)
Plwws ofItattoo verlety dense (bade county pint
Plfkecolto guedsluponsee (Blackbeedl
Plumorie $pp. (frenglpsnli
f!odocarpws spp.s (Podoegrpus$
Polysclas belfoorlanae feelfour gratis)
Pomtederlo Mckerolwaed)
Psychotr le servos (Wild Cott")
Itandla sastssts Iftaedle, White Indian berry)
tlaynasls Septestrlonalis foarling pica$
Sogl"arls (Qrro headi
Scaovola 1ploalorl (Inkborryl
kirpus (butrush)
'� cr
Sophor• tomentose (Necklace pod)
Stanoloblum signs@ (Yellow older)
Surlans meriting $Bay coder)
Tecoeerls camels (Cape honeysuckle)
Taxodlus (Cypress)
Totrotygle bicolor (Tetrat"Ii• Mast Indian 1110
Thumbergla orectsS (Kings - Hantis)
Thumbargte *pp.* (Clock vino)
ThyralIIs glows (ThyralIIs)
Trachelosperwum Jasailnoldese (Omfederato Jesolnel
tinlole penlculato ISea oats)
Viburnum suspensuma ISandanlcme viburnum)
iamis florldens Montle)
Ienthoxylum lagers 1111141 Its@)
KEY( a Exotic species
c':
•mar•.— .� � ih � h�afi�"r"^ .. �+y.•:..ti..w .� � :.L•
�' �e �- - .' . _ - -• ".. � .. . -.1, • "�'n': �!� .� w..�...�µsti.�'j.�+?l�al4i.��'�ir�c`/i�i�'{a'Yi�_
0
S. ECONOMY
1. Project Costs
The Applicant estimates a total project cost of $48.3 million
(1984 dollars). As shown In Table 7, an estimated eighty-eight
percent, or S42.3 million, is to be spent in the Region.
Currently, there are five buildings witn 153 apartments and 3
offices on the Terrem ark site. Apartment rents range from $300
to $650 per month. Annual receipts from the apartment units
total approximately S966,000, and property taxes in 1983 were
$156,000.• An estimated 274 persons will have to relocate from
the site.
TABLE 7
CONSTRUCTION COSTS
(S1,000)
Item Cost• in Region
Land $10,851,279 100
Labor 16,217,100 100
Mtater i a l 16,217, t On 70
Interest 4,732,959 a0
Preliminary 324.!42 So
Planning
_ TOTAL S46,312,7E0 as
• 19014 dollars
SOURCE: ADA
-- 2. Construction Employment
The Applicant estimates tnat 674 temporary full-time equivalent•
(FTE) construction jobs will be supported by the project over
38
. _ .. 1 -.,. . _.1--�4r::•�..,+.-.✓�.... wFrC[ ! fM:rli�.r�w'K"'nj �k'.'!' ems.:
• , . _. .... ... -w • ^ '.:•:= .. `�is�`3�vir'!t?r,..' �['"'•s' _ Cct,�-try^ +!Ykii7i,,sit!�',.
the one year construction period. Construction wages are
projected at $241,082 per employee -year, or a total of $16.2
mi I 1 Ion.
3. Permanent Employment
The Applicant projects 926 permanent employees at project
completion, with 407 in services, 25 in retai i , and 425 in
finance, insurance, and real estate. An estimated seventy-five
percent of employees would be from the Region.
Assuming 228 new employees, the Council estimates that this new
permanent project employment could generate up to 482 new jobs
in the Region, (with 78, 401, and 3 jobs in Broward, Dace, and
Monroe, respectively). This employment corresponds to $9.6
million in total wages and, by its indirect and induced
effects, could add S14,1 million in value added to the regional
-� economy (Table 5).
4. Fiscal impact
-� Using historic average public expenditure rates and 1983
millage rates, the project would have a positive fiscal impact
of $355,653 for Miami, $386,664 for Dade County, S247,802 for
the Dade County School District, and S15,573 for the South
Florida Water Management Di str ic# and -special districts
-ti combined, for a cumui ative annual regional total of $1.005,692
(Table 9).
39
44
���'+ r%,fitty�..- mow- �v'.'r� r++w�i.` a�.i[+'".'�'. .. � ,.. V"+, r..1(..'ia'.-. .. .._ � ' • _ _ _ . ? .
•^. �';`,+:•lr. �' ��e�l ter w +.•'�• .
• -
.. ...n ^��.::Ica+.1.i•W�`.iiY':ty.r�.7�'::+ri.�ia,.t/�:,',�'r.....fiv.`r: ,._:..4 �:'i14:tYfA�":'as4i:-1Z'^J'::::tL'�:�•�:�}.•:�`�'�: `.? •�: :':.:....-•. .1D'•1.. .. ...•.�. .. ..,., .. .. ..... ..
TABLE 8
PERMANENT EMPLOYMENT IMPACTS
A. EMPLOYMENT
SO. FLA. PALM
BROWARD DADE MONROE REGION BEACH
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY, FISHING 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
AGRICULTURAL SERVICES 0. 0. 0. 1. 0.
MINING 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
CONSTRUCTION 1. 2. 0. 3. 1.
MANUFACTURING 3. 8,
0. 12. 3.
TRANSPORTATION AND UTILITIES 3. is. 0. 18. 1.
WHOLESALE TRADE 1. 6. 0. 7. 1•
RETAIL TRADE 21. 39. 1. 61. 11.
FINANCE, INS. AND REAL ESTATE 22. 163. 1. 186. 10.
SERVICES 25. 167. 1. 194. 13.
GOVERNMENT 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
TOTAL 78. 401. 3. 482. 41•
• . . . . .
B. TOTAL WAGES (1000 S)
AGRICULTURE. FORESTRY, FISHING 2. 5. 0. 7. 16.
AGRICULTURAL SERVICES 3. 6. 1. 10. 4.
MINING 0. 1. 0. 1. 1.
CONSTRUCTION 23. 32. 1. 56. il.
MANUFACTURING R4. 172. 1. 227. 17.
TRANSPORTATION AND UTILITIES 91. 392. 6. 489. 44.
WHOLESALE TRADE 31. 125. 2. 158. 19.
RETAIL TRADE 245. 407. i8. 670. 124.
FINANCE, INS. AND REAL ESTATE 394. 3463. 14. 3871. 210.
SERVICES 431, 3510. 24. 4030. 239.
GOVERNMENT 34. $0. 2. 116. 19.
-- TOTAL 1308. 8254. 73. 9636. 723.
• .
C. VALUE OF OUTPUT (1000 S)
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY, FISHING! 7. 25. 0. 32. 74.
AGRICULTURAL SERVICES 10. 16. 4. 30. 11.
MINING 2. 3. 0. S. 3.
CONSTRUCTION 146. 208. 8. 362. 62.
- MANUFACTURING 308. 991. 5. 1304. 213.
TRANSPORTATION AND UTILITIES 284. 1221. 17. 1522. 137.
WHOLESALE TRADE 63. 251. 4• 319. 38.
RETAIL TRADE 963. 935. 40. 1339. 264.
FINANCE* INS. AND REAL ESTATE 1224. 10755. 42. 12021, 651.
SERVICES 872. 7217. 59. 0148. 403.
GOVERNMENT 46. 110. 2. 158. 26.
TOTAL 3924. 21733. 162. 25439. 2000.
• • • • . • •
D. VALUE ADDED (1000 5)
AGRICULTURE. FORESTRY, FISHING 4. 12. (1. 16. 37.
- - ' AGRICULTURAL SERVICES 6. 9. ?. 17. 6.
MINING 1. ?. ?.
CONSTRUCTION 0. 3.
_ - MANUFACTURING F 3 • 363. 2, 478. 76.
TRANSPORTATION AM UTILITIES 194. 633. 12, 1038. 93.
WHOLESALE TRADE 41. 161. 3. 2040 24.
RETAIL TRADE 282. 469. 20, M. 142.
- FINANCE. INS. AM REAL ESTATE $85. 5143. 20. 5748• 311.
SERVICES 606. 5017. 41. s664. 336.
- GOVERNMENT 37. 00. 2. 129. 21.
j TOTAL 1693, 12137, 103, 14133. 1065.
Nose Numbers May not total du; to erounaing.
SOURCE: SFRPC �/ (l
tow
' .. _ 1� ✓}.riY.r'.r wear � P'r+� 1[•r+tf.TV.C+` .n:�Vet•.:.�. L� ,L�. 1 `+.'. .
-. _. .-. -w• ".•Jt°4y�e1t't'_WMi°^:rTiy.T-�'f�!�'Ly'.•rr�!'}"1:3��1It.�atA!!t.'.M1..'�'cjr' �\. !�ar.i'i ,'�"�'ne w �••
r •�.•by�SM.1 M.T T. 1. 'C', r Jy- v ..
. ... .. .. .. .� s. •.. .u.•....Ri�f�Wr�li�L�JMiIG4bL/Yi`AM1:+:.�F_.'v .. L��-� M ..d :•.�• .n.�l.i l... i. ...•J�MM1w•:. ... �n.. • .•..
TABLE 9
FISCAL IMPACT
ftWW Of 1*%*I.O~kT rtrw& *AW U.ENTkE
LOCATION
Cltr !� I A111
L'V MTv D"k
ov IAL DI4TkICT %pwrwu1.I~V
•U:HUIL D1StkICT Dam
fY►E If DEVELOP "T I41[EO
tvOt Of DNELLtwo UNiT
YIMULL'�At11LT
IUUII.T1�fMILv
T•MIILE�MlE
OL"MER 10 UNITS
O
IA
O
Nl#*ER IY STUDENTS P•R Ulf
u. UO
.50
0. OV
Nl•11ER Of P[RSONS r'ER UNIT
O. AV
1. 7+
0. UO
TOTAL W0,191R Of UNITS t•
tOTAL NLW4,&R UP STUDENTS 1.
kESIt1EMT PUIRLATICN 27
NLRNER UP EtiLOYEEi 1020+.
MMIYStt COWAXIED USING Ok<kAIN COEffICIENT•
ELifNDttlOW CATEIY•tIES
CLTY
nowTY
V«[At DICTkIrT
V"04L 014FTFIICT
MNIERAL 114"Al- lot •
')•A 12.
•
I61410
•
1n
P44LIC W11TV •
Jww•
•
I7S27
•
O.
DEAL TM AND 60:LFORR •
1l/tAlt.
•
slow"•
•
612.
RILCMAT1UIN ANO CtLTLO* •
tiSr
•
7%"
•
O
'MAWWORTATION •
72".
•
27243
•
1.7
NATI*AL REEL INCES •
1AS7
•
I•A2S.
•
20
PIQLIC tutAcx •
bn�•
•
!ed"
•
1•62.
Pf-CELLAME91M •
21101
•
17A6}
•
124IM
E1rJ ATIU•1 LaYIEN(Ul "Of•
•
17:�:
MICATICIN AkMNY. DE•f
,Wkvh'E AND CAVITAL 4:00LOY
•
l•PO
',KC1AL CAOIfAL FAf ILITv
ANIA NL F. �ff.NOt T1.06% •
O.
u
•
0.
•
O.
REV9V*A C/LTIOCA1EI1
CITY
COUNIV
S"CIAL UlsfNlev
Whoax DISTRICT
PM)KRTV TA/ES •
40&ANS
•
464211/
•
2*26t.
•
25421•.
OTHER TAXES •
I5woob.
•
INS•
•
O.
SEIIVILE Cmw.Ks •
7362
•
04408.
•
II71
OTHER NON -TAU LOCAL IdVENUE •
Mv2.
•
34il•
•
O.
STATE INTILWAOMM1Ek1AL •
12lM1
•
21fit.
•
O.
fEOEAAL IHTERC-cVERNnEkfAL, _ •
_ 225D4.
•____52t//•
•
w.
STATE E0ULATILi11AL
•
976L
fROMIL EOW'•Af10kAL
•
2214
HISCELLAW&Jr' •
38"b.
•
900"
•
l?Al
•
tllri
am -viva REVEMLTS •
704v42.
•
Q
•
Q
•
Q
112
CITY UIIMTY eve -SAL OISTRIcy
TOTAL NEtl &WJAL E><Pfl1Olumal. • 177079. • 1S-/1M• • I7=t7
fOTM. NEW iowuft REVEMIEs • swa. • • sv*ou • ism
MST SYMPLUS 4 MUST ! 0 3@6kG3 s 3emb64 0 99G/1
1101111111, 1114TI141rT TOTAL
• 1.7IZ • . ;p?2/7
_ . _ -. .: -"'�+ -+� dart �.rf,...y,�.. .n-•- ...__ '. `• ,-r„ .r. ]..•CjYYl�iW L ...� 1
�. .. ��- .,_.r: __ _..�._ ...i.+.�..M.y►a� Y►.'.'t"s+2o--.si+i +ti :. � r r ...1_d .+. t � ~ � ��.
w.1.. _ - ..1 a '�%C ^+" _.r... r, � .rr •f' �... r.- w. ;s. r •.+ t.•. .•h :,.f..1 ,. - -•
• 's�'�L%�4'y"-ii�r"r •,r i _' • w-•t„�y,,., � ., t � .: . `..:•'...eir��,y4 •.... ���ir'7
,. - - _.. .• __ r "i _�' ...-i`'c-�-�+�•�-+�+�'ate'+sfnt�l�,r.WaYti,Nrrl,wt�i?l vr�r"j� ✓i��.i..:'�'
".�x�. W �a�L4k..iy+�r�IA�di+. ._ y'iM � .Mi%�i r� - .. Ir -'�:.'1:. ' I • 1'
.:+.Z'XC'S!�!r1�Tw-+rwatie:.:t'. r"i n� .'.. .•:.i.�: Ai::Jr.:.. ".f.:.�:"i:.�l#=.4:Lh.."..J+
C. PUBLIC FACILITIES
1. Water Supply
The Applicant estimates potab i e water consumption to average
35,$00 gallons per day (gpd), suppi led by the Miami -Dade Water
and Sewer Authority, with a peak demand of 89,500 gpd. This
would be -a net increase of approximately 5,800 gpd day
( average) above the existing demand of 30,000 gpd (average).
WASA has indicated it has sufficient capacity to'serve the
project.
2. Waste Water
The project is expected to generate 359800 gallons of
wastewater per day, with a peak flow of 89,500 gpd. The
Applicant has stated that no hazardous wastewater or toxic
effluent requiring special treatment will be generated by the
project. All project-generateo wastewater will be treated and
disposed of through the Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Autnor ity.
3. Solid Waste
An estimated 1.86 tons or 6.51 cubic yards per day of solid
waste materials Is projected to be generated by the project at
bulIdout 0 986). Solid waste will be collected by a private
haul ing company and taken .to the County Central Transfer
Station. Dade County has indicated Its ability to process and
dispose of the material without a6orse impact.
42
85--72.
4. Energy
The Applicant proposes to use electricity as the sole source of
fuel for this development. Energy use is shown in Table 10.
TAKE 10
PROJECTED ON -SITE ENERGY USE AT BuILDOUT
Developeent Annual Enemy use
-02'"D0^ent _ ( BTus x 109 )
Offtee 21.32
Retail .70
Residenttsl 90
-
TOTAL 22.92
SOURCE: SFRPC
Total energy consumption at project buildout is estim ateo to be
22.9 billion BTUs, or 6.7 million kilowatt hours. This Is
equivalent to the energy content of 3,646 barrels of cruse oil.
Since this Is electrical energy, three times this amount of
-
energy, or 10,938 barrels of oil, must be consumed at the power
plant to provide energy to the s1te.
The Applicant proposes to Implement a number of energy
conservation measures, Including energy -conscious site design
with landscape shading of open spaces and a generally east -west
orientation of the building, separate metering of office and
residential tenants, use of fl-wrescent lighting and minimal
use of incandescent llghting, hot water temperatures set at or
e
43
t::
�t
t•.a l..•...„ �•• '_•t :.:J`•.: �.t!S+r•,.• �w.�L..j'.•i: *�1 ..r.. �?a!:.11+i'�a �.r fit. •'i.r:;:.� ... - .�K ...! ... u. :1 .. ,. � • � _ ..
�1.a�r,� ,.' '."Wt"���► �'•'^'fr �' 4t J Y••t n Fa► M � •Kai �� a�y� ^�'., - .. ..
-�:iyy�y .,,� r.+.. �. 1G ..3+� Ni: �,.�. ri_�+r `Z. . r• �'�Mnl�+i �a...r i .- .
l►^,'^� • » y ".' �'a:w••-"�4+M! r%!�'�4Y's'Aw:.•rw'`".!.!+'"+•� i Jatit".�. •j.• •• v J i �w..Ys a i,�..:t :� :'CY:«d. :t:N. yt.... ._ ✓.�• -
1
.:Kp,i�yyay •.l ..a.:a r••�-.....CiwT+`r�i :-. 'i.:+.. ': .. wJ•.+evrs.��. �'.': ["hli`±.Y���v.'r=»'r� 'av'' �C..:'w.rw [''ia�"/�''
..riF�'i/'.-r.+.16.1'.e�»wv :4Nr=:.... �!•:.S'!w':f:t:1: �'9C�,�.. •.�.'."'-iu::�:'wi�ol+---
below 90°F, a central energy management system, a variable
volume air distribution system, insulated glass that is tinted
or reflective and insulated walls, and encouraging use of task
lighting in office space. The Applicant evaluated a
cogeneration facility, but determined that it would not be cost
effective. The following additional energy measures should be
incorporated into the project buildings:
e Use of light colored wall and root surfaces with solar
absorption coefficients less than or equal to 0.50.
• High efficiency air conditioning systems with minimum EER
ratings of 10.0 for the office tower, and 9.5 in residential
areas.
• Airlock doors at major project entrances.
Measures that effectively yield, in the cooling mode, R-11
In walls and R-19 in ceilings.
• Restricted water flow in lavatories to 0.8 gallons per
minute, use of flow restricting shower heads, and water
closets with capacity of no more than three and one half
gallons.
.'ql2 M•. .�►••,. .r. .!+►j`i {!' J . � i SZY� :1 1 �i. . ? •J •N•'.. ... _. n . . .. .. . .. .. .. . , .
_ .•i.•..- ...... •.:.. .r � it � n 1. b. - y '
•w •r aG_ ,ter..- _.�� =L.•'. :.ww v��: �:!y..•..�• ... •i � 1' _ _ •'�..
Zurm
•"i' .' . ,ri ►•ar ll�vsR}�q+r-3w—ALL:{:itt, r� irf "'ns'�`l "ar...'.':.' f�irc ^; � Za.R'f� t . ! :"::1..'«C't•.• '•.L'• s+�' __ .�
�-'�• .. • tier..
. _2,. ... _. .. ''i',: :... .. ..... .. ...., i-..�........:.aS.w.v��►cur.::x�.'rw:ui:n�...••?.:. _„ .:.Z ••-•�•.�wri�.1''}�%4i T•..+ '�%: L. •.,
C
e Non -electric energy sources for space heating, cooking, and
water heating, where feasible.
Solar water heaters in townhouse units, as feasible.
Computerized elevator control system Otis Elevonic or
equivalent).
Bicycle support facilities, i.e., secure bike racks and
storage areas for project employees.
5. Ed uc at i o n
The Applicant estimates four children of school age will reside
on -site and be served by existing schools.
5. Recr+ eatton.and Open Space
The site plan calls for 11,810 square feet of urban plaza area
and 18,410 square feet of pedestrian open space. The project
also includes 50,406 square feet of recreation space located on
the top level of the parking garage including an exercise area,
,. :. .'�_..Yr�njYri�a'J►^i''.M'9wr�,..w..."v`.S.Y�.va'v!'yi"...�fi�"�.'�.`
7. Heaith Care and Fire
Emergency medical service Is available under County contract
with Randle -Eastern Ambulance Service. Average response time
1 is approximately fifteen minutes or less depending upon
location of the closest ambulance. The contract with Dade
County sets a maximum response time of fifteen minutes. The
Miami Fire Department Rescue Squad will also respond in both
non -emergency and emergency situations, with an emergency
' response time under four minutes.
Fire response would be from Station No. 8, located at 2917 Oak
Avenue. City fire officials have expressed concern that,
because the project is considered in "excess" of development
anticipated for the project site, it may adversely impact basic
public fire protection provided for the area. These impacts
could become significant to service provided for emergency
medical service and on -going safety inspections.
At the present time, the Miami Fire Department is developing an
Impact Fee Ordinance to be imposed at building permit issuance,
calculated based upon the cost of additional facilities to
serve "excess" development. The fire department indicates that -
this project could be subject to the fee ordinance. The
Applicant should enter into an agreement with the City that
specifies Applicant responsibilities for contributing a fair
share to required fire facilities.
I.
46
I���C� - Ti�✓M•y.M�ii.•• � ri 1 • 11.�.� .. .. 1. *. t .f • t. . Ci. -..i{I ...�.... _ .. � - _ s .. .. ..
• le•r' Y 1... 1
..il �' �. .. ♦a... .._ qY • .. �yj:.". • ,. ... • ....w .. r, .. �.:\,:w.•\1'r •�ww: .� .'y;j,�N. b... �\. «.•.•• ... si�`•b.. .. .. .. _ ... .. ...� -
Applicant indicates that fire protection equipment and
facilities will be provided as required by Chapters 38 and 51
of the South Florida Building Code. The tower and annex garage
buildings will include a hydraulically calculated automatic wet
type fire sprinkler system, fire alarm system, emergency
communication system, pressurized stairway system, smoke
control system, and central control system, in accordance with
Chapter 51. in addition, the Applicant wi l I provide for
vertical evacuation to the office tower roof top, for transport
by a hovering hel lcopter.
8. Po I ice
Po ice protection would be provided by the City from its
downtown station at 400 NW 2nd Avenue. The Pol ice Department
foresees no problem in providing routine poi Ice service to the
site. Response time 'to the site for emergencies would average
four and one-half minutes from time of call received at the
station to the time emergency equipment arrives at the site.
0. TRANSPORTATION
1. Existing Traffic
The traffic impact area is bounded by SW 8th Street on the
north, LeJeune Road on the west, and Biscayne Bay on the east
' and south (Figure 6.) .
rJ
PROJECT SITE
SUNSET
DR. I
E
RICKENeAmcrn--...
%*Aubl:WAT-
LEA.
BOUNDARY �■arss
FIGURE 6
TERREMARK CENTER
�t
SOURCE: ADA TRAFFIC IMPACT AREA
•t
n.
.4. '���.•� r `��., a E
t
--------------
f'ok
Existing average daily traffic (ADT) data is based on Florida
Department of Transportation (FDOT) and Dade County average
daily traffic maps, supplemented by previous traffic studies in
the area and additional ADT and peak -hour turning movement
counts. Both ADT ano peak —hour roadway capacities are based on
the Urban Transportation Planning System's (UTPS) capacities at
level of service (LOS) "C'.
Of the twenty-one roadway segments studied in the impact area,
ten operated below LOS "C" In 1983 on a peak -hour basis (Table
11 and Figure 7).
TABLE 11
EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS: ROAD SEGMENTS OPERATING BELOW LOS "CIO
Se
en+
Peak Hour LOS
Roa0wav
. Fran
o
S. Bayshare Drive
SW 17th Avenue
SW 22no Avenue
E
S. Beysnore Drive
SW 22nd Avenue
SW 27tn Avenue
E
S. D1•xte Highway
SW 17tn Avenue
SW 27tn Avenue
E
(US 1)
S. Dixie Hignway
SW 27th Avenue
(US 1)
Grand Avenue
McFarlane Road
Bird Road
SW 37th Avenue
Coral May
SW 17+h Avenue
Woune Road
S. Dixie Highway
(SW 42no Ave.)
(us 1)
LeJeune Rosa
Sunset Drive
(SW 42nd Ave.)
SW eth Street
SW 37th Avenue
(US 41)
e eased on 1263 +ref
f ig cow1te.
SMCEs ADA
r
w
r
SW 42no Avenue
F
Mary Street
E
SW 42no Avenue
IF
SW 37+n Avenue
0
r
Poinclens Avenue
0
Hardy Road F
SW 42no Avenue
C
Or. A-
E V $. .
d
Q
U
COCONUT GROVE
STATION '
SOURCE: ADA
E
PROJECT SITE
MWARLANE RO.
ST.
rn ,
0
�6
(3
nICKENBACKER^—
CAUSEWAY
LEGEND:
6 p ROAD SEGMENTS
D 1Z11 THAT OPERATED
BELOW PEAK —HOUR
LOS"C' IN 1983
IMPACT AREA
RGURE 7
EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
`J
s
-
,
f r
• r
� i r� tt�.l
r
ti_
fir., ��•.
r.d
_
._ .. - .- - .. ' - .. _. ,... �'+�.•�r-ma's:.:.,. ♦ e w s,♦r` ~.
d#
2. Programmed Roadway Improvements
Numerous transportation Improvements (Table 12 and Figure 8),
estimated to cost almost $36 million (1984 dollars) , are
programmed within the traffic impact area, through 1990.
3. Background Traffic
Background traffic was projected from 1983 to 1987 (project
buildout) at 1.77 percent per year, compounded, based on an
analysis of traffic growth trenas over the past five years
within the traffic impact area.
With the addition of 1987 background traffic to the impact area
roadway network, one of the ten road segments that operated
below LOS "C' In 1983, Coral Way from SW 17th Avenue to SW 37th
Avenue, is further reduced from LOS "D" to "E". One additional
road segment, Main Highway from Poinciana Avenue to McFarlane
Road, fal Is from LOS "C' to LOS "D", with the addition of
background traffic. Thus, eleven roadway segments are
projected to operate below LOS "C' witn the addition of
-- background traffic ( Figure 9) .
,
4. Committed Development Traffic
- ---------
The CouncIIIs standard traffic impart assessment methodology
requires applicants to consider developnents that have received
local government approval but whose traffic is not included in
6
r
N
CA
S
j.
S
TABLE 12
PROGRAMMED RrADNAY IMPROVEMENTS
Segment
Cbst
Location
From
To
Improvement
Construction Year
(x $1000)
S. Dixie NIgh44ray
Pbnee de Leon Blvd.
Douglas Road
Reconstruction
1986-1987
954
and reailgnnent
SW eth Street
SW 42nd Avenue
SW 27th Avenue
Reconstruction
19R5-1986
9,207
(4 lanes)
1-95/SW Ph Street
Interchange
Rasp modification
19M14-IOR5
476
1-95
u5 1
26th Road
2-lane ramps to
1995-19R6
1,140
and from 26th Road
SW 17th Avenue
US 1
W. Fiagler St.
Reconstruction
1905-1967
515M
(4 lanes)
SW 27th Avenue
115 1
S. Bayshore Dr.
Widening 14 lanes
1989-1990
10070
Rickenbacker
Mainland
Virginia Key
New bridge, toll
1984-1987
21,524
Causeway
facilities and
approaches, main-
land intersection
Improvements
. Aviation Ave./Tlgertall Ave.
Slgnalizatlon
1984-1965
SO
Aviation Ave./S. 9ayshore Dr.
signal I let Ion
1984-19As
50
TOTAL
$35,971
SOURCE: 1984-1969 Dade County Transportation Improvement Program
:'t .
•• it ..i t � S
77
A:
�
tl
•i
f,
•1
4�
.
•
� t
. i
1 '.
• 1
I
- r
. iSi�+�ji�'+�rh"Z^�'r,X].fiC•SIR+f�2^.Rt a+e!!.7�.�t ni. �T���::.� �.,�.... ..
W
Q
FIGUFEa
PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
S.W.
CORAL
w
a
ti
N
i
w
AVE.
—jF.
8 ST. •l Q
w incri a ,►
• r
4 N =�
r
5• .
WAY
• o
RICK ENBACKER----
i
-l`'� CAUSEWAY-----
C��¢ y 0P
' 'w9G
PROJECT SITE
+Osseo- PROGRAMMED 1WROVEMENTS
••••• PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS
METRORAL STATION
® SIGNALIZATION
Q RAMP MODIFICATION ,
i
�r
t•
a ■
��Yl�i�llll�hlllllll �''�I � d IIIII�
i did�tll II�IIIIIiIV�VIu �i�
i
.w+t■o�71�laV■w■■r�i K Mto
�KKN �
•
COCONUT GROV06
STATION
• ,I
40
40
s
t
flu
7-i
qc
b
V
RICKENBACKER---
CAUSEWAY
GRAND AVE. . F LEGEND:
PROJECT SITE ° ROAD SEGMENTS
° PROJECTED TO
° v� OPERATE BELOW
NCIANA Ate' PEAK -HOUR LOS "C'
� MCFARIANE RI).
IMPACT AREA
F
SUNSET
DR. FIGURE 9
SOURCE: ADA 1987 9ACKGROUND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
#IBPllfq �Ti iP7N^7i+*+riAnM.._._.
.
r
i .
I
u
� � � � �_ � '.....�•-...r. •......vim. 'r� X .. _•... �.+.:►�'a, � •'
.. _. .. - ..•.... •ice`• •f•. ':h+Y �(Yi�'wK ..�M f� � =� '•. +• y'�`,
.. • .. ... .. .. .. _ tiM.� - . � +�•T '�j. .Nly''• Y r C•:1! ifr4�N•.. 1%+}j., 4'-,.
•, � - ,yam ... ��h•- .. .•
.. _ ..... .... ..• __.. .. -.a ....._ _ ....... _ ... a . yrwo:':i{7 ii':Gow�::.•.:a:+:a•1rl+.:tt�:4as:wr..�:.a%r..: ,ry�3r+i•=. ��'..,i;c•. _ •C, _.•n,Wr'u.
"existing" counts. One committed development, Grand Bay Office
Plaza, was identified by the Miami Planning Department (Figure
10). The proposed project, totaling 175,000 square feet of
office space, is estimated to built by 1987. A daily trip
generation rate of 12.3 trips per 19000 square feet was used
(Source: Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation
Engineers, 1982). Both committed development and project trips
were assigned to the impact area roadway network using Miami
Urban Area Transportation Study (MOATS) data.
Witn the addition of Grand Bay traffic to the impact area
roadway network, two of the eleven road segments that would
operate below LOS "C' with the addition of background traffic,
South Bayshore Drive from SW 1'1th Avenue to SW 22nd Avenue and
from SW 22nd Avenue to SW 27th Avenue, are further reduced from
LOS „Ell to "F" .
Grand Say traffic would also reduce peak -hour levels of service
below "C' on one additional road segment, SW 27th Avenue from
South Bayshore Drive to Bird Road, from LOS "C' to "D". Thus,
twelve roadway segments are projected to operate below LOS "C'
during the PM peak -hour prior to project development (Figure
11).
FIGURE 10
COMMITTED DEVELOPMENT LOCATION MAP
S.W. E3 ST.
> wc
> >
ta Q 1 �N 'NJ
> 3c
CORAL WAY •
m OYLP-A-
ui• RICK ENBA CK ER--N-%.W-
z
COCONUTG
STATIONROVEvti L--CAUSEWAY---
nion
LEGEND
ui 1. GRAND BAY OFFICE PLAZA
SCALE
0 112
MILES
SOURCE: ADA
.1 1
I
�� � ui�dlVlJm�i���iiv��IlVlr�'WV'IVViIiIII�Wo�I�JV��fl
N 1 E
v
11
ST.,
N Zi
Q � C
J�.
WAY
N 1 �.
• � O�P�L v S• ��O
COCONUT GROVE MEN _ . >>, P yC
STATION K P
w
4 J
x
V
cc
RICKENBACKER
CAUSEWAY
m
4
t
will
F •
131E.
F -
GRAND AVE. E �� LEGEND:
F PROJECT SITE o� ROAD SEGMENTS
o PROJECTED TO
w OPERATE BELOW
NC1ANA AVE' PEAK —HOUR LOS'C"
o MCFARI ANE RD. IMPACT AREA
ri.
i•i
SUNSET f
DR. FIGURE 11
FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS-
SOURCE. aoa (WITHOUT PROJECT)
•
1
1. .\ •F
rt1 �
1•i
• ..r—. .� �1.. .'� � .. r T+ . iw•+ti�ti �!i^ � y O.?�!f'i1'� i � Y'��! f:.� ` .x'..�;j.��•.-- a.
l
- .- ..!liM�!W. -V {..,.• _— .. ''1 �.�II i�4t.. w...�.r�.- J: w�ji lli;�i�.-.
. r•1.1.��. .. r' 1�.ri.i .. .... - 1♦ � -��rw �•�`irt� �."Y /1 • L �`V'.'y I '
., +..�.. .�.... .. _.� [� y raj/���y.�,. �J •�y�JT, . ,`. _
' _ �•Fii.•'.r L.Y... •'.tw�IY.��•�Ti�'M��!•YN, ..'-iV.'y1iY•^T��oi�•i1�' rZ'IX��'=}q pM1 �11H
5. Project Traffic
a. Trip Generation
Project traffic was projected using standard Institute of
Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip generation rates for
residential (5.2 daily trips per dwelling unit) and office
(10.9 daily trips per 1,000 gross square feet of floor
area.). Since a small percentage of retail space is
assumed in iTE's office generation rates, project retail
space was included in the office land use category.
Twelve percent peak -hour transit ridership was assumed.
If fully occupied, the project would generate 3,422 daily,
614 AM peak -hour, and 590 PM peak -hour vehicle trips.
Vehicle access to the site would occur at one entrance on
I
Aviation Avenue. Drive-thru banking would be provided
from a single -lane entrance on Tigertail Avenue that would
exit on Aviation Avenue.
t ,
At the request of Council staff, the Applicant evaluated
moving the bank entrance from Tigertail to Aviation Avenue
in order to avoid westbound left -turns on Tigertail
-= Avenue. It was determined that the site design would not
allow for sufficient internal vehicle stacking It the
entrance was on Aviation Aypnue. However, an exclusive
left -turn lane for vehicles westbound on Tigertail Avenue
sa
W
SL . Jv�..�� ^. . _ _....^.+�..�.�_^^.. _. ^...- �. —�.�� .....��� ..ram-�-.�.. �..�^. �...•�... - r.. ^ .. .� .. ��+— ...-.. -1
a
11
e zp, s...• .. �. - ..0*10 ow
...
A
to the drive - in bank should be provided by the Applicant
to alleviate potential delay on Tigertail.
b. PaeN rkin
The Applicant proposes to provide a six- level parking
garage with 1,052 parking spaces, exceeding City
requirements by 441 spaces. Two percent of parking spaces
would be reserved for the handicapped and five percent for
carpools/vanpools. Five truck bays would also be provided
in accordance with City requirements.
c. Mass Transit
Three local bus routes currently serve the project
vicinity. Also, the Coconut Grove Metrorai I station is
located two-thirds mile from the project. Regular shuttle
service, provided by the Applicant, should connect the
project with the Coconut Grove station.
d. Future Traffic
With the addition of project traffic to the roadway
network, one additional road segment, Bird Avenue between
US 1 and SW 27th Avenue, would faIl from LOS "C' to LOS
"D". Thus, thirteen roadway segments are projected to
operate below LOS "C' at project but idout (Figure 12).
Ll._..Lty S.W.
E IU
lu
COCONUT GROVE
CA SUNSET F %
Ai OR.
lk SOURCE: ADA
B
> t
ca
r � 3
to � �•
RO�P,� V S• ¢� V
MEt �o
CJ•
r�l
PROJECT SITE
MCFARLANE RD.
FIGURE 12
RICK ENO ACKER---
,-CAUSEWAY•-----
LEGEND:
ROAD SEGMENTS
® PROJECTED TO
OPERATE BELOW
PEAK —HOUR LOS'C"
-mmm-"= IMPACT AREA
FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
(WITH PROJECT) I
Vi
i
,f.
+
.40
with construction of al Intersection Improvements
discussed In Section 6 below, none of the five critical
Intersections analyzed by the Applicant fall below LOS "C'
(Table 13).
TABLE 13
PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACTS: CRITICAL INTERSECTIONS
_
AM Peak -Hour
PM Peek -four
_
% Project Traftic X Project Traffic
-
► ovenent
Wvwent
=- InterSection N S E N
L
LOS
SW 27 Ave./Tigerteil Ave. 0 17 2 2
B 6
1 0 20 C
SW 27 Ave./Soutn Bayshore Dr. 0 0 S 0
C 0
0 O S B
Aviation Ave./Tigertail Ave. 4 51 20 19
C 79
2 2 0 C
Aviation Ave./Soutn Bayshore Or. 0 4 3 13
C 0
81 0 0 A
SW 27 Ave./Bird Wac 1 8 19 0
-tea®
A 19
1 O 0 C
6. Recommended Improvements and Funding
By 1987, the year used for the Applicant's
traffic
analysis as
project "buildout," unacceptable levels of
service
are
projected on nine regionally significant arterials
(thirteen
roaaway segments) In the impact area during
the peak -hour:
• South Bayshore Drive, SW 17th Avenue to
SW 27th
Avenue, LDS
"F"
61
��J
Aft
Oaps 00
'
. v
0
•' _ .. . .. a j ta' �y^„�".rr Mh`^i cti..y�.1a/,-•,r,tt,,,"...�,�:�.<e:
• SW 27tn Avenue, South Bayshore Drive to US 1, LOS "D"
• US 19 SW 17th Avenue to SW 42nd Avenue, LOS "E"PF"
• Main Highway, Poinciana Drive to McFarlane Road, LOS "D"
• Grand Avenue, McFarlane Road to Mary Street, LOS "E"
• Bird Avenue, SW 27th Avenue to US 1, LOS "D", Bird Road, SW
37th Avenue to SW 47th Avenue, LOS "F"
• Coral Way, SW 17tn Avenue to SW 37th Avenue, LOS "E"
• LeJeune Road, Sunset Drive to Hardy Road, LOS "F", LeJeune
Road, US i to Poinciana Drive, LOS "D".
SW 8tn Street, SW 37th Avenue to SW 42nd Avenue, LOS "E"
Each of the nine roadways specified above, with the exception
of SW 27th Avenue ( see below) , cannot be widened due to
right-of-way constraints. South Bayshore Drive, which is
estimated to carry approximately 18 percent of project traffic
north of the project site and 15 percent of project traffic
soutn of the project site, would operate at LOS "F" both with
and without the addition of Terremark traffic between SW 17th
Avenue and SW 27th Avenue by project buildout (1987). The City
has designated this road a "scenic transportation corridor" by
Resolution 76-1045, which entities it to protection as an
Environmental Preservation District according to Chapter 64 of
the Miami City Code. Any road within an Environmental
Preservation District cannot be widened. Furthermore in 1977,
House Bill 1116 extended State protection (Chapter 77-491,
62
... .. ... ... ✓•71M'!ur'/gY.:x':M Cdl.ys t/t.•It.: ".'
•i/M1�."j�4 �. `tpyKr1 1. n�,!'I.�t. r., � � t . ' - . ... �1•... .:-y.� •. • � � �. �.i+i".����i"M�t�'yii�s'w'.j`1 'ijry
U
F.S.) to South Bayshore Drive by designating it as a "State
Historic Highway."
;'IPA The Council's fair share methodology has been applied to data
presented in the Application. As previously discussed, almost
S36 million (unless otherwise stated, all costs are in 1984
dol cars) 'In roadway and intersection improvements are
programmed in the County Transportation improvement Program for
the Terremark traffic impact area. Terremark would
significantly benefit from the programmed 4-lane widening of SW
27th Avenue and signalization of both Aviation Avenue/Tigertail
Avenue and Aviation Avenue/S. Bayshore Drive, all road
improvements that will provide additional capacity for
motorists accessing the project. Since reserve capacity on
programmed Improvements would be taken up by the project, the
Applicant's fair share of programmed improvements is $128,747
(Table 14), in proportion to its share of total traffic
-- projected for 1987 on these segments.
Applicant recommended improvements include the widening
of Av cation Avenue from South-_Bayshore Dr ive to Tigertai I
- Avenue to 3 lanes, with a middle lane for left turns (Figure
13)9 $100,000; additional northbound and southbound through
lanes, a northbound left turn Cane, and a westbound right turn
lane at SW 27th Avenue/Tigertail Avenue (Figure 14), S70,000;
63
s
lG1 -2
0
- '-. • .. _. _'�.�y,+�\d- :►.v� �..!. rt" ;i'R .-w:b i.+.Y 4rti7i ,{+T,Sv.-•-•}+._w .. ~. — .. ' :-..s.. -
3
9
.. - ...• � n �. ... .. ..� s..a.yu �\cv�'. ►t... .•L.r+. ..sue. -.Lrw _ _ ... .....}' .. r.. .r ... a...-.. .. _. a�.. -. �. r� ... ..
t
.�A
TABLE 14
APPLICANT FAIR SHARE OF PROGRAMMED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
Applicant's
Location
Improvement
Cast"
Fair Snare"
US 1 from Ponce de Leon
Reconstruction and
S 954,000
S 12,337
Blvd. to Douglas Road
realignment
SW Btn Street from SW 42nd
Reconstruction
5,207,000
8,407
Avenue to SW 27th Avenue
(4 lanes)
1-95/SW 8tn Street
Interchange ramp
476,000
0
modification
1-95 from US 1 to N. of
2-lane ramps to and
1,140,000
0
SW 26tn Roan
from SW 26tn Road
SW T7th Avenue from US 1
Reconstruction
51500,000
0
to W. Flagier Street
(4 lanes)
SW 27tn Avenue from S. Bay-
Widening (4 lanes)
1,070,000
90,493
shore Drive to US I
Rickenbacker Causeway
New Briage, toil
21,524,000
0
facilities and
.,approaches, main-
land intersection
Improvements
Aviation Avenue/Tigertail Signaiization 50.000 139690
Avenue
Aviation Avenue/S. Bay- Signalization 50,000 3,820
snore Drive
$35,971,000 $128,747
* 1984 dollars
* "0 " inoicates no Terrem ark traffic assigned to the facility.
SOURCE: SFRPC
64 f G
SS-'72�
�. r. iw.��- }`�; �` �'�, �' _�'�``'•�� �.'
terry r..Y.r f.. _. _. ; ��!� .
� .i' .• .t .e
� �, y
'
t
- � --:.rY - • Y � •-•.r+�1Y`r..Ir+.iwMn✓.r. Ll '�, •r Y '.i w. 1 q ..� . y:
• yr ,.ry. - � - ...'� '�
.. ._ . � �. ..
... - � .. -..-
.� �.+'�
_. r.. .:.i+.T...i a•.L.•2��►31r�•i.�wr.•'.:�+.1: .:: L• ��... :L.I ... rw•.. •�'�-\'4 ti.L•1 5.�. y
_
.. ._ . _ .
.....µt. - �'
.. ._ _ . r _ :"�C'w...�..i✓.:...• �.. ^.;r• « _ ... e_r,:.- w- ..J.. '.:+iy.•��p��M�i .w r.ryy.�
. - .. .....
•�� ••T ~'Vr.
Mn.�.f..:'.'�wi.:� v4v^+tVp(Yiw�ffi.:.' iit�..iY�.ii• �Y.
.J'�'..;
1T+�"'a•'-.i�'I•T
��.y'�.iM-:t_� .ii.J�•A'..U.••M. �t.�i.•ii.•�J•.9`�r•�'•hI•.Mh�i�:.}VL%�I�.w'iia'.M..'�S
A
F I GORE 13
AVIATION AVE. AND INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
SOURCE: ADA
85--72;
..._.. .. .. �n ...... -.. _ .. .. .. ...ter.. .:.Tr'•�.f. �...-....ti.� ._
_. .. _.. ^u' .... r `�"'a.fi'}'w'rYt �n�,•�,,tr.+.} Y � 'i:!.1'i!4'MC:,�nS.".'Yi.'�`Y2 'tom 'i�,
. .... _.� .._..... ... _. .. .... .. . _......_ .. ..:•. :u: .:.� .. ....... .. .. ..�:.Y:�:r_�:�iL2t:i�i..`•_.�a._:r�ri'.d,'..:rL.�. _.���v: :yi}'..':•`... ..•. ...'�.^.
0
SOURCE: ADA
FIouRE 14
RECOMMENDED IMRROVEMENTS:
SW 27TH AVENUE/TIGERTAII AVENUE
EWTWG
...�.. .t...�•t.r.r•.•r`•�+woo-i...•. ..�•ntn•riir ��•+t��.�, _ _. -- � ----
• _ _+ _' may,-...... •:�..... �,r t .,•;.,,. ...:rt 0. ���t•,Vva - _ ,; A.. :�.- _ . -
.
eastbound and -westbound left turn lanes on Tigertaii Avenue at
Aviation Avenue (Figure 13) and a westbound left turn lane on
Tigertail into the Terremark drive-in bank, $45,000; and a
northbound left turn lane on South 8ayshore Drive at Aviation
Avenue (Figure 13), $15,000.
Table 15 shows the Applicant fair share of these recommenaed
roadway improvements at $158,674, or approximately 67 percent,
i
since the fair share is the ratio between 1987 Terremark
traffic that would use the improved roadway or Intersection and
the total increase in traffic between now and 198' on that
facility, based on the Applicant's traffic analysis.
I
'AA
I
•
Based on the above, the Applicant fair snare for both
--
programmed and Appl icant- recommended transportation
improvements is $287, 421. Fbwever, , the term "fair share" as
used in this Terremark DRI Assessment is somewhat misleading
since -the programmed and Applicant -recommended Improvements
identified in Tables 14 and 15 do not mitigate project impact
on many segments of the regional roadway network, which, as
noted above, cannot be widened due to right-of-way constraints
or scenic designations. If the Applicant's transportation
impact could be fully mitigated by widening roads whose levels
v =
of service are projected to operate below LAS "C', the
fair -share would be significantly higher.
67
x
85" 72;
.Y�� �a.._C:. ��..?M+ftti is :.. � ,:y••i: � . IIAlt
r
r'y,p
I
- � ..�...' Mom.-wu... t a.. f.;. .�+: r.'r..r..rt a-...r �.' 11A '_ t. _ �.t�...�•.....
.. - ... _ . . •..' ...... .A"�h4.11OA'�/n.l3 "''.�.1iY'�'�"T�."1�.'1: S1 fijh!►t •��N'i'{�.•-v 1n.:tia4ti.«r t^ • �.. �r._r..�.
eastbound and -westbound left turn lanes on Tigertaii Avenue at
Aviation Avenue (Figure 13) and a westbound left turn lane on
Tigertaii into the Terremark drive-in bank, $45,000; and a
northbound left turn lane on South Bayshore Drive at Aviation
Avenue (Figure 13), $15,000.
Table 15 snows the Applicant fair share of these recommenced
roadway improvements at $158,674, or approximately 67 percent,
since the fair share is the ratio between 1987 Terremark
traffic that would use the improved roadway or intersection and
the total increase in traffic between now and 198' on that
facility, based on the Applicant's traffic analysis.
Based on the above, the Applicant fair share for both
programmed and Applicant -recommended transportation
improvements is $287,421. However, the term "fair share" as
used in this Terremark DRI Assessment is somewhat misleading
since -the programmed and Applicant -recommended Improvements
identified in Tables 14 and 15 do not mitigate project impact
on many segments of the regional roadway network, which, as
noted above, cannot be widened due to right-of-way constraints
or scenic designations. If the Applicant's transportation
Impact could be fully mitigated by widening roads whose levels
of service are projected to operate below LAS " C', the
fair -share would be significantly higher.
67 (�(
8,5- 72:
.
E
J
.... �l i.. �:"9::i�.'.. _.::J•� .. ... ... ....�"�.' � . . _ . ... .. _.�. � ..w .4: �..... ... .... ....:,i�' ...wn r.......... c._.: i.......,..�ir n'w`..i �.'. �,:•':.: �..:++:.i..r:i+
TABLE 15
APPLICANT FAIR SHARE OF RECOMMENDED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
Applicant's
Year
Location
Improvement
Cost"
Fair Share
1987
Aviation Avenue from
3 lanes, middle
$1000000
S 94,940
S. Bayshore.Drive to
lane for left turns
Tigertail Avenue
1937
SW 27tn Avenue/Tiger-
NB, SS thru lanes
701,000
11,091
tail Avenue
NB left -turn lane
WB right -turn lane
1987
Aviation Avenue/
ES left -turn lane
459000
39,265
Tigertail Avenue
on Tigertail
WB left -turn lane
on Tigertail
to Aviation Avenue
WB left -turn lane on
Tigertail to
Terremark drive-in
bank entrance
1987
Aviation Avenue/S.
NB left -turn lane
15,000
13,378
Bayshore Drive
on Bayshore
TOTAL
$230,000
$158,674
NB -
northbound
SS -
soutnbound
ES -
eastbound
WB -
westbound
e 1984
dollars
SOURCE: SFRPC
.. _ ..-. ., '�` .. - r _t•M.+a„r,-'a.`.w�rc�'+8':-k�rr�'_'Kw.�1L<Xi1P1i."';.J'�',`''�"�`s. t�.�"':L;,•!h.r,..�. _ ...�• ... �- ... .
Thus, the Council recommends that the Applicant construct all
Improvements Identified in Table 15 (S230,000) and deposit
$60,000 (1984 dollars) in an escrow account for County wiaening
of SW 27th Avenue from 2 to 4 lanes, divided, from Bayshore Drive
to US 1, a programmed improvement scheduled for construction beginning
in 1989. As additional mitigation, it is recommended that the
Applicant provide weekday shuttle service to and from the Coconut
Grove Metroraii Station at no cost to riders at 10-minute intervals
from 7:00 to 10:00 a.m. and from 3:30 to 6:30 p.m., and at 30-minute
intervals between 10:00 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. (S55,000 annually).
7. Cumulative Impact Analysis - Existing Zoning vs. SPI-17
The previously discussed Bayshore Drive Development Study
11-N (prepared by the Miami Planning Department) identified ten land
parcels in the Bayshore Drive area of Coconut Grove as having a
"high probability" of,developnent, or likely to 5e
developed/redeveloped between 1985 and 1990 (Figure 15). in an
effort to identify "worst case" impacts of the SPI -17 over i ay
district, Council staff requested the Applicant to calculate
the traffic generated if all ten parcels were developea by
project buiidout (1987) at both the existing 1.21 FAR and the
proposed 1.71 FAR (the existing FAR with a 0.50 FAR bonus for
providing publicly accessible parking), although City Planning
Department staff
have
Indicated that
it
is highly unlikely that
more than two or
three
of the ten "high
N
probability" parcels
69 r/ ,3
85w-72;
FIGURE i5
DEVELOPMENT SUSCEPTIBILITY
C00" 'e'' 4 " u au
��
/i�s.ei.,�4 tj''� � ---�
> �:�.�qi
a d a�r_.��
a �.�.
r� ., _ , ._
���..ry�,i;
��r��_ .a
��._--
���
I•
U
•4t� T�
��
j�QM�oN reoo•rtut�
p4qq°� � �.... t...
q V� rooaun r.ouun
;�� c ,...-,...
_ �n��l�'
0 100 200 300 400
� � SCALE IN FEEt
SOURCE: CITY OF MIAMI PI..ANNING DEPARTMENT
�:
� .�i. -�'.
r�
i' ,t ' T '' )
�?
i � � .� �
� !
f,
�� -
fi,
}� jt :�,�
_.,
� 0 • �
'i•�f
tia}�•
,'t
�f�yt(*.
`,ifs �t; p����Y(
yi:
.�i,
.,�,• .
tijEft
,,It
t,' LF',f �
��
i
��t, �S. •�,
��
.•
}
��.
•� • _
'y'�
{
;.,� ,
,.:
.
���•����
�.
�
t
4•
i•
`.
�;
• �;
i� . • . .
.
�,
��
7
1
' � �- ,• .::� �t..•r ..� ..mac_
would ever receive the 0.50 FAR bonus. Under both analyses,
the following developments were included in addition to the ten
"high probability" parcels and Terrem ark: i
• Mayfair - Retail 460,000 square feet
• Monty Trainer's - Specialty Center, 100,000 square feet
• Dinner Key - Exhibition Hall, 15,000 square feet
Theatre, 500 seats
Marina, 200 slips
• Grovegate - Office, 297,000 square feet
Retail, 31,400 square feet It
For the 1.21 FAR development scenario, Terremark traffic was
estimated using a 1.21 FAR rather than the proposed development
level of 1.71 FAR.
Under the 1.21 FAR development scenario, peak -hour levels of
service on segments operating below "Cl would be reduced on
four of the twenty-one roadway segments in the impact area:
• SW 27th Avenue - S. Bayshore Drive to Bird Avenue, LOS "D"
to "F" ,
• Main Highway - Poinciana Avenue to McFarlane Road, LOS "D"
to „E„ _
• Grand Avenue - McFarlane Road to Mary Street, LOS "E" fo
"F" , and
• Bird Avenue - US 1 to SW 27tn Avenue, LDS "C" to "F".
71
,�i 'r,•,�.;" ` ..+.rid v N.1W, ...•+ �"✓a"'•f.:''.7G' ?i..r=..-."• y �.i+w"r' ' ' ..r?; J. '.Zr..� ..__ �:i•`:.- » T - -.
:. ...- .. .... -.' .x� .- rK4..i:(�Cis�iitif"r.�r�C:�='.".�'iir�+i'i!�'.ta".•..'ii�Set.►, �'.a»:-•::•:.:�•r..`...�...y�6iir��»�`S::'/':�:�.,'ii:�il��•=`..:....-...-: �JYt+:'�..._ :. . .. ...,.� ....-...:'..
LI
�7N
But toing ail ten "high development" parcels at a 1.71 FAR would
not reduce levels of service on any additional segments. No
road segment would receive more than 75 additional peak -hour
trips as a result of the 0.50 FAR bonus being applied to all
ten parcels, plus the terremark site.
72
//i
Qom*
85ww i1� Z;
09
01
....... .. .. _ - ... .. .. - .. - . .. .�.• ,.�: t'�'7�:• ... ice.. .,' .� • _ !
�.- - - � � .. � .. .. .: .. .. � ,.. .•-�'ta."•_':.-ir:...... .r « .,l4..ryl..wir t.�`�.+rY-'1r.'^tTri �'�.Y�`�`l+.w? 1.^4„',..
r
.. _ , •.... ,. :s�hw:.4:r ��,�..: 'W.._.._._j.'�i vi�i.2i zi: ......... ;:.wca•ni:,.r^_
•
PART III — SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Summary
The Development of Regional impact assessment for Terremark Centre
Indicates that the project would have the following positive regional
Impacts:
e Up to 228 permanent new jobs would be generated by the project.
Nearly 255 additional full-time jobs could be generated in the three
South Florida counties, with a $9.6 million increase in total wages
and $14.1 million in value added to the regional economy.
A net positive fiscal impact of S1 mil I ion would be created by the
project.
The project would eliminate regular discharge of polluted stormwater
runoff from the site and Aviation Avenue to Biscayne Bay, a State
aquatic preserve.
Council evaluation indicates that the proposed project should not create
adverse regional impact on soils, animal life, or vegetation. However,
In terms of adverse regional impact, the project would:
9 Increase existing potable water demand by an average of 6,000 gallons
per day (36,000 gallons per day total) .
73
�. tom.. ._*. ...+5�':y':: a`�.".: t..�:��'!�= — �yNr'!Ti.. �'.. ':f-t�'3�`'S-•t... 'I�"'3 �.wT •. �.: '.� •::\.-�rk:••��:'• r_ .1:. .. .. --
47
yi�y__ rr. � .Lr � .... .. 'iir!S•.�y � _ _ ..
.�:f'i+ii1•�+��7}^.^.ww+�.w..! '+�.r:?•vr y,Mi�f:':�+iii+^�.'^�"." ` �"' .`.o. r�4.['1'.�: .:t7 'YS..t�, •........
�'9 !fy'.�..1 .u1 !� � .."('� i a. rig\�rt..;Jl..: ..w'.."rwtf+a�I'Wn1Yi.e�l.. . •. YKNi14' t�i �L/ ��. .:1 �� .. :.ti
• Increase annual energy use within the Region by the equivalent of
11,000 barrels of residual fuel oil.
;ON a Potentially increase the amount and number of hazardous materials used
on -site and the hazardous wastes (a waste that Is ignitable,
corrosive, reactive, or toxic) generated, thereby posing a possible
threat to groundwater and Biscayne Bay.
• Increase the quantity of runoff pollutants entering the Biscayne
Aquifer.
• Generate an average of 1.9 short tons, or 6.5 cubic yards, of solid
waste per day.
• Generate an average of 6,000 gallons of wastewater per day above that
presently generated by existing site development.
• Place adaitional unfunded demands upon police, emergency rescue, and
fire services, although the public agencies responsible for providing
these services have indicated tnat they will serve the project.
• Generate nearly 3,420 daily and 600 peak -hour vehicle trips on the
regional roadway netwark.
74
'1l d
85 7,2'
-.`-r.�i � � .. .. � .. .. .. _ _'.[. � rg+#ii.C� a.a •.�.. a•+T•: tip♦ .. ��7�� �.. !•j..a� � :'1'�[' ''n
Y
.. -«. ,�j►!•�Sy.-..2�•iR Y'K•'•r '.1. .ty ^4ir y.� �� _ 'f� �,J'�ti
. ._ -._ . �_„ :-,..�: " _•. "' ,�� � �r... nt.• ...... _ ..� r- t.r ,.! fir.. �*,w'•,` .�� •'R,ru
. _ `_ ..� -� _.�.. _ :,i�•.wn��y✓ . ♦ " 2 rti = +r rt M � .t+� � :�.'�:,,..�•ws is �'awe.tw L
- .:•r -::' � `� - ". •'R' :.-. ?Ys:.� idl!7�n•�wi+ ...sue" war. ►r,��',i"��il�.:.�'�`.Ytx".r+'.
� .. _ .^... .�Ao- ..,, ✓poi uy
•*16
... .. . .. . '.r.':.VYi!'. `�'•�'l'!"�l:etiti. !j. ..�,a`..�..i_ ��H. � ,� .i;..•.i.. ..... >d�'...n r+.eu�ercui:b:.r�a�w �w.. :.
Recommendations
Based on consideration of the above specified positive and negative
regional impacts and provided that the Miami City Commission adopts the
zoning recommendations of the Planning Department's Bayshore Drive
Development Study, i nc i ud i ng amending Zoning Ordinance 9500 by adding the
SPI-17, South Bayshore Drive Overlay District, it is the recommendation
of the Council that the Application for Development Approval for
Terremark Centre be APPROVED subject to incorporation of the following
conditions into the Development Order to increase the probability of
realizing positive regional impacts and to mitigate, reduce, or eliminate
adverse regional impacts:
THE APPLICANT, iTS SUCCESSORS, AND/nR ASSIGNS WILL:
1. incorporate the following into the project design and operation to
minimize the cumulative impact of Terremark traffic, and its
associated pollutant emissions, on air quality:
• designate five percent of employee parking spaces, located as
close as possible to elevator and building entrances, for
exclusive car or vanpool use. ---
• actively encourage and promote car and van pooling by
establishing a car pool information program, and offering
preferred parking spaces and work shifts to car and van poolers.
75
i/ 9
ss-7x
• actively encourage and promote transit ridership by providing
regular shuttle service, pursuant to Condition 16 below, between
the project and the Coconut Grove Metrorail Station, and by
r ` providing Metrorail, Metrobus, and shuttle service route and
schedule information in convenient locations throughout the
project.
• Promote staggered flex -time work schedules, four day work weeks,
or other management actions and marketing strategies, that
reduce peak demand for roadway capacity and tnereby reduce
transportation energy use.
2. Design, construct, and maintain the stormwater management system to
meet the following standards:
• Retain all washdown water from the parking garage in a vegetated
retention area with a raised catch basin(s) that direct(s) any
overflow to sedimentation boxes and, subsequently, drainage
wells.
• Washdown parking areas only when there is adequate storage
capacity in the swale(s).
• Construct all catch basins to retain oil and grease, and
' regularly maintain the catch basins.•
• Vacuum sweep the garage area before every washdown.
76 �'
i
t
• actively encourage and promote transit ridership by providing
regular shuttle service, pursuant to Condition 16 below, between
the project and the Coconut Grove Petrorail Station, and by
providing Metrorail, Metrobus, and shuttle service route and
schedule information in convenient locations throughout the
project.
• Promote staggered flex -time work schedules, four day work weeks,
or other management actions and marketing strategies, that
reduce peak demand for roadway capacity and tnereby reduce
transportation energy use.
2. Design, construct, and maintain the stormwater management system to
meet the following standards:
• Retain all washdown water from the parking garage in a vegetated
retention area with a raised catch basin(s) that direct(s) any
overflow to sedimentation boxes and, subsequently, drainage
wells
• Washdown parking areas only when there is adequate storage
capacity In the swa 1 e(s) .
e Construct all catch basins to retain oil and grease, and
regularly maintain the catch basins.
• Vacuum sweep the garage area before every washdown.
76
/ *),O
ISS- 7Z;
•^�!�+y-�wi+ws' . .�...k+2r.�.k•... u. _ .,ems,._ :•� iN 7 •Z 1..
�..� ' -� +r- t •!~7� .♦ � r � � ' ...' � " ;"» • �.. ..� s _ •�k �.. v'. ' yr • •{...5 .- r• `
y I.r '!� r"»�aT.:�'�i+w.Yrii'��W:+•rzi.:."'wtl::*w.•- %Yitif�....+i�'-.��i•� _ ...�_ .... ..� - •
-. ...tom. - � � - A�.j•� '-+h M•�vit y *z'. ..
::n•: . :•,l �. Z:i�l.il: •..-. �s yam.. ..; ti"�.�.�. '.'Y�.:r:!. .. ,. i ..��-....ar.i.J r:�!.l ' ..
3. Submit a revised drainage plan showing Swale location, dimensions,
general runoff routing network, and calculations which demonstrate
adequate swale capacity to the Council for review and approval
before requesting any building permits for the project and as part
of the consolidated Application for Development Approval required
by Conoitlon 17 below.
4. As part of the transportation improvements required by Condition 14
below, reconstruct the street drainage system for Aviation Avenue,
from South Bayshore Drive to Tigertail Avenue to manage runoff from
a 5-year storm by retaining the first 1.5 inches of runoff in
R� french drains, with overflow from the design storm discharging to
Biscayne Say. If underground utilities prohibit use of french
drains, the Applicant will construct a drainage well system capable
of managing the 5-year storm.
5. Incorporate into the development, by restrictive covenant and/or
lease or sales agreements, as applicable, hazardous materials
accident prevention, mitigation, and response standards, to be met
by the Applicant and all tenants classified by a SIC code listed
Table 4 of the Council DRI Assessment that use, handle, store,
display, or generate hazardous materials (Ignitable, corrosive,
- toxic, or reactive), including those identified in Table 5 of the
77
'�ti '�.+4a�h .yeaJ 'a` {« a 1 .. -•-. .'L.a.. � ^ _ '.t . .. _.. •.� • ]i'��.; a ". , _ `• • :w.!1 - • rs
e
Council DRI Assessment; provided, however, that the uses in Table 4
and the wastes in Table 5 shall be simultaneously amended upon the
,R addition or deletion of any or all of the listed uses, materials,
or wastes by amendment to the "County and Regional Hazardous Waste
Assessment Guidelines" incorporated by reference into Rule
17-31.03(2), Florida Administrative Code. At a minimum, these
standards shall:
• require that areas within buildings where hazardous materials or
hazardous wastes are to be used, displayed, handled, generated,
or stored shall be constructed with impervious floors, without
drains, to ensure containment and facilitate cleanup of any
spill or leakage.
require tnat the loading/unloading of any hazardous material or
hazardous waste shall occur in a covered loading/unloading dock
with a spill containment area not connected to the project
drainage or sewer system.
• prohibit any outside storage of hazardous materials or hazardous
waste.
• require all hazardous waste generators to contract with a
licensed public or private hazardous waste disposal service or
processing facility and to provide to Dade County GERM copies of
78
�. _. .—.... - •�^. =. ., d�as���d3t�'�'>,�'f'��Y:='7"�ai�AkWl4:!•1.'w Y'4wS�rtl:')^� "�..r_r.� _ '.,;'
.. .. _....� .. .. .. ...� .. . . .. '.:��' .. ...... ...:•i:...ai .�: �.eri6.�.r•sY:.+Y.w.r+s �� �...'.n^ :vl.+�:,�='r' . .a.. �. .. • .... �.. «... .. �.. �..- . �.. .. .. .. r..r
one of the following forms of documentation of proper hazardous
waste management practices:
- a hazardous waste manifest;
a shipment to a permitted hazardous waste management
facility; or
a confirmation of receipt of materials from a recycler or a
waste exchange operation.
• notify any tenant generating wastes of the penalties for
improper disposal of hazardous waste pursuant to Section
403.727, Florida Statutes.
• Allow reasonable access to facilities for monitoring by the
City, Dade County GERM, and Florida DER to assure compliance
with this development order and all applicable laws and
-- reguI at ions.
6. Remove all invasive exotic plants from the project site as the site
is cleared, and amend the landscape plan to ensure use of only
those plant species included in Table 6 of the Council DRI
Assessment in future project landscaping.
_ 7. Prior to any site clearing, consult with, and follow the
T recommendations of, the Dade County urban Forester concerning
transplanting trees presently on the site.
79
-.i.S.=T�.••. •'j'!' it . _ ..i _ .. � .r.. _ .. .. _ . .-. = +•• �7r � r.[' 2" )� ..-ti..r �'y�•s'�.. r + f � . - • x ,`.*. j:.. ---
_� _ .�,.. � _ ..•:+.ai_� 'r-�+Mr.r.ii+�'+rli..�' ��.! -t,y .r r„Cr+�'�M�'. {�� •j,. �l
.. -• ._ _� - ~ii•) � •y..,+•w+� i ..�r�-+.. /41 r.rw ��+.t• �.wM t � � y�i.. � '
.n.r..-..:.•�"� _ _ . 's.. •__ • • _^' _ _ * :r� �":rZ-•a" i - w :��... . i. ....h .4A_J
yam. _ - � - . • ; .: s% ."t. _ `!' ..e-... ^ ��n-...st" '.'L�i�'vl�i �(�'i�i"n1�w f��f �•r�-
arm,
... - _ � "•LiTio,,:�•a�1,ia��� •'A.v"+�y.t+i•+.i!<<..-.,1"ti`� ,7 rr..i+,'f',..r.�w.r ^Y: ::.T4 I t'r tir�•'ys..
8. Delay construction up to three months in any area where potentially
significant historic or archaeological artifacts are uncovered, and
permit State and local historic preservation officials to survey
and excavate the site.
9. Obtain the necessary approvals from Dade WASA for water and
wastewater service.
10. Construct the building to allow emergency helicopter evacuation
from the roof.
- 11. Collaborate with the Police Department to incorporate security
measures and stems into the design and operation of the project.
Y 9 Pe P j
12. Enter into an agreement with the City to contribute a fair share of
capital facilities required to provide adequate fire service to the
project, or, In the alternative, pay a fair share contribution
pursuant to an adopted City impact fee ordinance pertaining to fire
service if such impact fee ordinance is adopted by the City prior
i
to obtaining final'.certificates of occupancy for more than 200,000
` square feet of development on -site.
13. Incorporate the following energy conservation measures into the
�i development:
AO
00-0.0119
I
• Landscape shading of open spaces
• Separate electric metering of office and residential tenants.
n
• Use of natural light and fluorescent task lighting.
• Hot water temperatures set at or below 90°F, except where
otherwise specified by health codes.
Central energy management system in the office tower that wi I I
provide start/stop optimization, time of day scheduling,
electric demand limiting, night temperature setback/setup,
programmed maintenance, and building lighting control.
• Air distribution using a variable air volume system.
• Insulated glass that is tinted or solar reflective.
• Airlock doors at major project entrances.
• • Light -reflecting and/or light colored wall and roof surfaces,
with solar absorbtion coefficients less than or equal to 0.50.
e Picycle racks and storage areas for project employees.
„yam - :.,:v. ;....: a.•....�. ` i, a --..
_ .._ .. � ... _ _ .. _ .. •-+'tom- • f � r. �'v . .�-..-. .... <•r. .r ...��.R:.��. ��"iY►'.�: �'”. ,,•tea.-• _ �... ,ya
. ''.^stk•...�4j'�"'+iD.�s+r•,^.''�s�+rn►w:iyuvb+Y+w.^•.`'r..sip..V�i+ii�'.ra.+riiT!:ii^".a'I,vw ..c `�,n i.C'� +`cam...
. _ ...�rYt%4.;•�.'7.9T-..w.:h�. ..._ �. .... ... �a:�:.irl.',�-�.. ...:.�:... .� .:..Watae w�. ... w.: �l�-....:i" �' � .nL.v::.� r. .:.ar:..•
A
• Lavatory water flow of 0.8 gallons per minute or less, water
closets that use no more than three and one half gallons per
flush, and flow restricting shower heads.
• Reduction of cooled space by thermally isolating non -critical
areas, such as closets and other storage areas.
• High efficiency air conditioning systems with minimum EER
ratings of 10.0 in the office tower and 9.5 in residential
- — areas.
• Measures that effectively yield, in the cooling mode, R-11 in
walls and R-19 in ceilings.
• Non -electric energy sources for space heating, cooking, and
water heating, if feasible.
• Solar water heaters in townhouse units, as feasible.
• Computerized elevator control system (Otis Elevonic or
equivalent).-` - -
14. Construct all roadway and intersection improvements identified in
Table 15 of the Council DRI Assessment and dedicate the
improvements to the City, prior to issupnce of final certificates
82
85 -'7Z;
l 1
of occupancy for more than 200,000 gross square feet of development
on -site.
15. Deposit $60,000 in an interest -bearing escrow account as partial
construction funding for the County -programmed 4-laning of NW 27tn
Avenue from US 1 to Soutn Bayshore Drive, prior to issuance of
certificates of occupancy for more than 200,000 square feet of final
gross floor area on -site. Such funds will be released to the
County at any time upon request. The Applicant wi 1 l annually
notify the County Development Impact Committee and Public Works
Department of the av ailability of tnese funds until such time as
the County expends these funds. A copy of this notlfication will
be included in the annual report required by Condition 18 herein.
16. After final certificates of occupancy are issued for more than
200,000 gross square feet of building space, provide shuttle
service each weekday using a minimum of two vans or buses to and
from the Coconut Grove Metrorail station at 10-minute or less
intervals from 7:00 to 10:00 a.m. and from 3:30 to 6:30 p.m., and
at 30-minute or less intervals from 10:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.
(off-peak). - - -
17. Consolidate all original and supplemental ADA information into a
revised Appl ication for Development Approval (ADA'), and submit
three copies of the docunent to the Council and one copy to the
83
�w+,,.r.,i:. - _ _ •4 _..,'yam. _ ..«r _ .. ...Yy, .ay:.yry.,.•.,1. p ..
'�.•r.... ~ ..'-+ K'r/ v4.4j'�?.r`TK�.I+r. �'i'Y,�W •Tr. �'..r r.r�M:�Fvt fty �i�'�i-+TM-� r../. ~''``•.{�.j��'� ••� M .. t .�. . _.. _- - . .. - - {•u....r..i.^y!".....:nxti tmsl'!`. ,`I've. t_ ...r i..Y. .. ._.. .. _
' • ��. � - - - . _:r.;,�,•V' ' �t"tom ••; ,,.�t::+�:� t;'.� .
_. .. _�nrw�• �.::-. ..^Y., u*.u-.._�.r.u� a.'Y'. C_ r4i .. ... ._ . .. ,. .. .... ••tiw.. •�..�.+w-.riL.. .. .:'.. ... �
n �
City and the Florida Department of Community Affairs within ninety
(90) days of the effective date of this Development Order.
18. Prepare and submit to the Council, City, and Florida Department of
0
Community Affairs, an annual monitoring report containing an
assessment of compliance with ali conditions of the Terremark
Development Order and any other information required by Section
380.06(14)(c)(3), F.S. Further, throughout project operation, ano
unless and until Rule 17-31, Florida Administrative Code, is
repealed or otherwise declared null and void, the annual monitoring
report shall include the following information:
Identification of all tenants that meet the criteria established
in Tables 4 and 5 of the Council Dili Assessment, as may be
amended pursuant to Condition 5 herein.
e For each such tenant, copies of one of the following types of
documentation of approproate hazardous waste disposal:
- a hazardous waste manifest,
- a bill of lading from a transporter indicating shipment to a
permitted hazardous waste management facility, or
- a confirmation of receipt of material from a recyeler of a
waste exchange operation.
rZ]
ss- 72;
�' - � , 4 - •- _ _ ,. _ ..:.i►-•i �•��'���... r-+..:.��.r-,�r''7S.r`.s.r:fYri...n%�.v.-."6"...��•".'i.�.!' L.i4'n. �.•r'
Description of any incidents or spills of hazardous materials,
including but not limited to those in Table 59 as it may be
amended; and specification of the actions taken to clean up and
dispose of the spilled material.
THE CITY WiLL:
19. Withhold issuance of final certificates of occupancy for more than
200,000 gross square feet of development on -site until the
Applicant has complied with Conditions 14, 1% and 16 herein.
20. Incorporate the Application for Development Approval, as revised
_
pursuant to Condition 17, by reference into the Development Order
for Terremark Centre as follows:
"The Application for Development Approval is incorporated
herein by reference and relied upon by the parties in
discharging their statutory duties under Chapter 380, Florida
Statutes, and local ordinances. Substantial compliance witn
the -representations contained in the Application for
Development Approval Is a condition for approval unless
waived or modified by agreement among the Council, City. and
Applicant, its successors, and/or assigns."
21. Incorporate the Council DRI Assessment by reference into the
Developnent Order.
. k _
.•....' W•.. •.: .:1..�,.�%•�L YYI�K.�:.n. .... ..K.�tiT.��'1M�•^�•i l�..�1.:'. .�. M'��n�✓.♦ . ,.l � ... " .. ,
22. Provide that toe effectiveness of the Development Order shall be
stayed and no development permits thereunder shall be granted,
until such time as an Amended ADA, providing updated information,
1s submitted to the Council, City, and State and an Amended
Development Order issued, if Conditions 1 through 17 have not been
complied with within four years from the effective date of the
Development Order. Should the Development Order be stayed pursuant
to this condition, nothing herein shall be construed to limit
Condition 25 below that this Development Order runs with the land,
and its terms and conditions are binding on the Applicant, its
successors, and/or assigns.
i 23. Designate an official to monitor compliance with all conditions of
the Development Order and specify monitoring procedures in the
Development Order to insure such compliance.
24. • Specify requirements for an annual report in accordance with
Section 380.06(14)(c)(3), F.S.
25. Require recordation of the Terr mark Centre Development Order with
{ the Clerk, Dade County Circuit Court# pursuant to Section
r
380.06(14)(d), F.S., specifying that the Development Order runs
with the land and is binding on the Applicant, its successors,
and/or assigns.
ss f 3 c�
IN J-0
AS
17
CITY OF MIAM1. FLORIDA
INTER-OFFIC'c MEMORANOUM
'O Randolph B. Rosencrantz DATE: January 10, 1985 FILE:
Ci Manager
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION - TERREMARK CENTRE
APPROX 2560-2580 TIGERTAIL AVE
APPROX 3204-3240 AVIATION AVE &
WROM• io z- s REFERENCES: APPROX 2583-2585 S BAYSHORE OR
Director
Planning and Zoning Boards ENCLOSURES: COMMISSION AGENDA - JANUARY 24, IJ85
Administration Department PLANNING AND ZONING ITEMS
It is recommended by the Planning
Department that a Development Order
for the Terremark Centre Project
located at approximately 2560-2580
Ti ertai1 Avenue, approximately 32 4-
3240 viat o'�n Avenue and approxi-
mately outh Bayshore Drive
be appro
The Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of January 16, 1985, Item 3,
following an advertised hearing, will consider the issuance.of a Development
Order for the Terremark Centre Project located at approximately 2560-2580
Tigertail Avenue, approximately 3204-3240 Aviation Avenue and approximately
2583-2585 South*Bayshore Drive; also described as Lot 1 less right-of-way;
Lots 2-4,:7-31 and an unnumbered lot'also known as Lot 32, Block 39,-NEW
BISCAYNE AMD (8-16), a Development of Regional Impact, approving said project
with conditions per Chapter 380 F.S. The recommendations of the Planning
Advisory Board will be presented at the City Commission meeting of January 24,
1985.
Backup information is included for your review.
A RESOLUTION to provide for -the above has been prepared by the City Attorney's
Office and submitted for consideration of the City Commission.
AEPL:III
cc: Law Department — — - - -
NOTE: Planning Department recommends: APPROVAL
SS2'
�w•�."n'...lL�.:.fa25�+`dq�.�.+%�''`.:a�.�r�'ri. ae� .iu.�+� •.+..:e::'•�:'. 1.-e:: ... v..`l�G. .._.. ._. .. +?_ .. ... _ ... .... .. _ .. .. -. •.V OR
'.i:. .'�- ='�11 �r �c �.iswig'raifLtlrv+�y.•.�a=�]eN.'�'!'2��i✓�G'•I2::'�.••.i�[.�'!;•h?Yl:'��i.�iwR'!�i^...�i�I�.'t`kS�� i��:1�?.'i�'�.r...� �!'+��: �.+ .,. . _ .._...�� r.vw:•:iiJ�L.s
APPLICANT
PLANNING FACT SHEET
Grove Bay Plaza Ltd. (Gary Held)
June 25, 1984
PETITION 3. APPROXIMATELY 2560-2580 TIGERTAIL AVENUE;
2583-2555 SOUIR BATME DRIVE
Lot 1 less right-of-way;
Lots 2-4, 7-31 and
Unnumbered lot also known as Lot 32
Block 39
NEW BISCAYNE AMENDED (8-16)
Consideration of recommendations concerning a
Development Order for the Terremark Centre
project, a Development of Regional Impact per
Chapter 380 F.S., also including a) issuance of
a Major Use Special Permit; b) consideration of
drive-in tellers as a special exception and c)
authorization to subsequently issue a Class C
Special Permit all as per Zoning Ordinance 9500
as amended.
REQUEST To make recommendations on a Major Use Special
Permit and a Development Order for a Development
of Regional Impact.
BACKGROUND Zoning Ordinance 9500 establishes a Major Use
Special Permit process (Article 28) whereby
defined major uses require recommendation by the
Planning Advisory Board and consideration and
authorization by the City Commission (both
preliminary and final) before construction can
be undertaken. This process encompasses
Developments of Regional Impact and other
projects (as the Major Use Special Permit
threshold is lower). It is the intent of the
Major Use Special Permit to include, in one
^action, any changes in the comprehensive plan,•:
zoning district classifications, other zoning
actions, and other City ordinances that would be
necessary for a building permit application to
be considered.
PAB 1/16/85
• r :\. � rS+le...#�.:� �i�•`La�.G a� . � .y yr�.�; �• ai.:�.:��.;.���`r`�!! �...:�." �'Y+r � ' � � � '_
.sa _—r.r•.�Yr••�rw7�'��1';!it�R.Y_, ___ � ~ .�... _' •a.'_.. ,•},� t, �s::.t i. y',.r:.•r.•:n! � �a�•.�.: .�.. �=r:.-.
. _ ... : r .. A+M. 'titer: Lr�:.%•r :.M �. * �. �•Y' VW.Jw-,, —4. i
_ � _c:' _ _ "._..�_.y..iww•..�+ii..._r•�-;,��.y�+..+�: � �'Ta-•:r r .c w. �.n"' `r''��,�• '.T.:. J •",w,�y.tt '., -�.rJ :' .�1 r.••-
.._ .. .. .. .: �....yy�:,.-.�.t.+,nt!`�� � _•".��'. ,h — ....M...r-�� Mi�ti���'.�'.�i.'+.�.:��rtie. i,�i �:ti -
ANALYSIS
at �Ya7.�c.a1�.,,,.c.'a'-i3►.*:A"+!•'.t'.�}�t��.2lfr, �;y,�w.•cy::�:'!
The sequence of events to this point isr•as
follows:
Meeting/Hearing
Planning Advisory Board Public
ee ng - Kesolution 82414 -
review and recommendation
of the Preliminary
Application for Major Use
Special Permit.
City Commission Resolution 84-903
inot a public earing) -
Granting Permission to file a
Final Application for Major Use
Special Permit; set October 25
1984, as date for hearing on
Final Application.
July 18, 1984
July 31, 1984
City Commission Resolution 84-904 July 31, 1984
Establisning a public hearing
date of October 25, 1984 for a
Development of Regional Impact
Hearing.
City Commission Motion 84-1210
Conti nu-1-n-gpu is hearing to
November 15, 1984.
City Commission Resolution
continuing public
hearing to January 24, 1984.
The project proposes:
Element
Office (18 stories)
Retail (ground level)
Residential (16 du's)
Parking (1050 spaces)
- - Recreation -+
RECOMMENDATIONS
PLANNING DEPT.
Total
Approval. _
Oct. 25, 1984
Nov. 15, 1984
Floor Area (S.F.)
314,000
8,000
19,200
333,300
60,400
7249900
PAS 1/16/85
I tem #3
`\%
17
1 ♦. 4
: •
PAB January 16. 1985 AS 45
Bounded by Tigertail Ave., Aviation Ave
South Bayshore Drive and the Naval
Reserve (Terremark IZ
AP K-25L/
-amsv". -s-o4ti,
Pl�
Now.
If
��i,�����•Iu�����.��,������i���iI��IIi V�I�ilud�Vll�Iiill�ll�l��i�I�I�i�i�dl���i11ijYlilllll�_�YII II IIIIII I � I�I�III'L+II ��I I�
PROPOSED ZONING
- revised RO-3/6'and
W application of SPI-17 Overlay►
CA
�'��••�' - removal of SPI-3 Overaly
�Y
- from RG-2/$ to RO-3/6
II�VIVhiIIIfI�YI�IYiIIdW1
EXISTING
16 Y'
ZONING
PAB January 1, 1985 AS-45 3 46
South Bayshore Drive Study
}
it
a
PROPOSED
Proposed SPI -17 Overlay
AIL-
-LIA
MGM&*
I LLI`.
ZONING
PAB January 2, 1985 AS-45 6 46
South Bayshore Drive Study _
I
J
x.
f
f
r
f
r
•
'
3
•
;4.
� v
..
. I . r. �.,;.rw..... - � •C.:. a'i.. � a^,y�f'_► •.. : {a.Y
,. r — L{!•.. •' '.. ^,•�["� . y{ _ ... _ • .
.. ,
. ✓ wrY"M.iA , yy4:� <c_
. a•. ...:.:.. a. r :V i � + � ..
,
w'i�l' •!'�7�--:-
:.:..•,..w.�;a
s�...� �+ �
-
-..�.. ww'•="is�3�.+iw.r .ii �.�.Z;�..•. ..aw
—
�:.w ..M '+M1.wsw.:v - , ..
:t''�'.'•I'•�.i 4• :-"'' •
..
i's;t
� ^-'r
as.:.a � :.�. � ti• •.I : .,
.,..: ♦ i1.!!.•y�w�r:%.'!v«�.i, 1 y
�w`�+'r;
•:Y► z•`�'.=�� .c
.ri iL•1'•!.^.2 v
�: �', •u t��..t�.,,r Wit.
:.aC{L..... ...
... ..._ !~ • �� _ . y' 1 �� I '...•:, A�ti��•iy�„y!.y�Y••
uttirr . +.y.:,
� .•
'� {�l�
i'£.
..
...—rr..Tiwf-w-.Jl.inyLN'•avi'Y•:._nrO•.
••..w...aw ..... wy,y •.1rltwfJ I�ir tivii.TLY.•rft�ia i. 1:.••11 ... •. .. ..\. .•. ... ... w. al
. •vwr Y1•..
.
APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT File Number MU-84.-
It isintended that major use special permits be required where specified uses and/or
occupancies involve matters deemed to be of city-wide or area -wide importance.
The City Commission shall be solely responsible for determinations on applications
for major use.special permits. (See Article 28J
The City Commission shall refer ail applications for major use special permits to the
Planning Advisory_ Board and to the director of the Department of planning for
r recommendations, and may make referrals to other agencies, bodies, or officers,
either through the Department of Planning or directly, for review, analysis, and/or
technical findings and determinations and reports thereon. (Section 2301.5.)
I� Gary M. Held hereby apply to the Director of Plan-
ning of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions
of Article 28 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance.
X Address of Property 2583-2585 South Bayshore Drive & 3204 Aviation Ave.
X Nature of Proposed Use (Be specific) A mixed use development named
Terremark Centreconstituting241,900 sq. ft. office; 12,850
sq. ft. retail; 95 residential tower units (185,250 sq. ft.),
333,300 sq. ft. parking garage (1,052 cars), 50,400 sq. ft.
recreation, and 16 townhouse units (19,200 sq. ft.) per plans _
and the Application for Development Approval submitted with,this
Preliminary Application
application.
I attach the following in support- or explanation of the Preliminary, Application: -- --' - -'
I. Two copies of a survey of the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered
Land Surveyor.
2. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of
• Interest form (Forms 4-83 and 4a-83, attach to application).
X 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375 foot radius from the outside
boundaries of property covered by this application (Form 8-83, attach to applica-
tion). .
Form I6-83 Revised
Page I of 3
wq-
... . .. �-.. 1.. -.:�i ✓,..!5�:�`�.�w: Wit:^K�•�-- '
,tiVY 't .. '_ .. - _ ... .. •... .��. �: ab•- .: ...�_ �. ...�.+.�w.• ...Mill ��•q%+a.!`t ... Ji...=
rs.. .. .. . -- .. • .. - � rY.. -tea"'►'':_'. .av _.. _. ... .:�...:w .* •_. .....: •�s
��Mwy . xa:.,1..:• :M .4�nw.�-• _, _r.,.l.� - ... :.. .•a.r _ � _ _ . .. .. - _'. 'w.3tw.-Lw : . �...^ � .
WOO
�. 4.
Mops of: (a) existing zoning and (b) adopted comprehensive plan designations for
the area on and around the property covered by this application.
= S.
General location map, showing relation fo the site or activity to major streets,
schools; existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features In and
adjoining the project, and the like..
101 6.
Concept Plan
_x „
(a) Site Plan and relevant information. Sections 510.2.3 (a thi ough h) and
2304.2.1 (d through h).
(b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed future uses, activities,
systems and facilities. Section 2802.3.2(a). '
x
(c) How concept affects existing toning and adopted comprehensive plan
principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special
permits, change of zoning, or exemptions. Section 2802.3.2(b).
i 7.
Developmental Impact Study (an application for Development approval for a
Development of Regional Impact may substitute). ;
S.
Other (Be spacific)
9. Fee of $ based on the following:
' (a) $.01 per sq.ft. of buiiding(s). Additional fees for any required special permits
changes of zoning, or variances shall be in accord with zoning fees as listed in
Section 62-61 of the City Code.
(b) Fee tabulation
Building(s) Office
241,900 sq. ft.
Other (Specify) Residential
..204,45if sq. ft...-
.Retail
12,850 sq. ft.
Parking
333,30Q sq. ft.
Recreation
50,40.0 sq. ft.
Tota1S42,900 x .01 = $8,429.00
Page 2 of 3
Form 1443
.. 85--72;
�} earn. .•. .,•t.• ...�.�.r'••►r.*rr.,;yt+:.... �. �•.�; .•..JNf." ... .. ..:• e�"[•. ... _^r•�-'.�,.._i_., a.• - .' l
W
i y.w.... '.r✓ r rp.. �l+ A�rL�• � w ••C••�I .► `I J ' � L � 1.+ �. ..
•. -. _ +_. _.+ .. •:• r!!!T�'M!N�'t.•�'�[?.��as.+,..'Sf'�+17;'� ;�Sr'�.�,�1!�..�^ {i'�'��.+•�.4..w.., t `,••• -
.�,r.• :,�w+��Y,�iY:%•n.SGiiiiwr.t•`'K��r�.: •-Xst`:.i++'.:;{ ":« •�t•.. .s r,;••_ .:.t: .a.
Final Application
1 attach the following additional information in support or explanation of the final
applications
Signature
Name Gary M. Held Address 1
City, State, Zap Miami, Florida 33131 Phone 579-0583
This appli.:ation is _ approved _ denied
in accord with City Commission Resolution No.
other
Sergio Mdriguez, Director
Planning Department .
Date
Form 16-83
Page 3 of 3
lD
J►n1w c': . L...�:n�
= a 1 c.
T� C/ L. n.r • W.� r-.Ji..r��w•. ui: W 1V• a..y, 01 L�� rY� j.... rW i:rr+if
ape sj GARY M. HELD who bei^4 by r» fir d•.:17 error::,
upon orth, deposes and 3.117V .
1, 7bat he is the a4ner, or the legal mp:'esentat : a of the
miner, suu_-.r_ttir4 he acc-_-.-nnlyi^.; application for a pdhlic hear!.-.; as
rwired by Ho. 95-00 of the Code of the City of N =i, Florida,,
e,ffec:ing the real p-. cpercI located' in the City of Miami as des wed and
listed on the pages attached to thi..s affidavit an ma e, a zar,, thereof .
Z. Thr,. all c•.- ars u-I ich hs : epr-se., .s,. U amy, rave riven their
ful? e_^.d c=lete re_ psi on for t"irm to act :Ln their `r_^Z`' for the chmnp
of N.r" irG riYl of 6 ClZ.r' rca►.i1.Iii or, regu, =bZW• of as .C3Lv I1 Iy Ur
in
• the •Zi. r.rrrw .•.� .1��5 �; Cw
3. T.-azz. big r=_Zes 6wvGc.:°r hereto erg 1m--mas a �' cf :.r_s f
rr: ,;_,1• ; ., the C.,— fir• es r=' ; mc, ads n-ce5 mh=e —=:•s a'"!
lei cescr:-: crs :er t e re-= e ,awner Or lessi
re;nsenzative.
4. The fars -as rerresamted =z the
Sn=w1.Yed ra C....4L"1 C:1 �•i 1rh 1.. ar.s affidavit are ir♦ ... Cr cc _—...
e_11\
SIr c=. to a_^.._ .s.L-r-_-_before me
ttiis '` day of July 19 1984
' NIIZZ:y FL-�A c, S =e of i? cr da at La. —de _
sion Fx—pi.•r:s:
NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA
60NDW TNRU GENERAL INSURANCE UND .
MY COMMISSION EVIRES JULY 16 1986
GARY M. HELD
. 85- I Z
- —=�e1r•soi�w
.ar
OWNER'S LIST
Owner's Marne GROVE BAY PLAZA, LTD.
flailing Address c/o Robert H. Traurig, Esq. 1401 Brickell Ave.
Telephone Number 579-0700
Legal Description:
See attached Exhibit "A'
Owner's Name
Mailing Address
Telephone Number
Legal Description:
Owner's name
Mailing Address
Telephone Number
Legal Description:
Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally
(by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375' of the subject
site is listed as follows:
Street Address Legal Description
Street Address
Street Address
Legal Description
Legal Description
N
3
�+
I
y j, -•`
^
w.•iNlnr .y.� t).�
_ .ti,\ ni ��w.i...LM •?.• _
-.axaC1��"�.y�Lr.,•hY. w'�I�t'J,'Y�r:.�'�Ot"t.. •:.:... .� .- •. '
fv��' �y���W.►'V*M...a!•'v'v..w"n+:.u�ii�..V+.�1n�.iS�j'��.�i'�.+rir•+�.
Z-'�n '..: li"1• `�•
� !'}r� ti'!:�
... ..fry_ ...
(, �•a.�J � mil.
.rli�`.�••: rr ir.Iti�- `' �• i.{•r ...YfY•• 'L•f/S�.•l•�•j�+ijiib'(�Y � II: y���i• �,y .MV.I'.•�.�-Fi � .Y.�w.� .. •r r
V�•:� w • r_. .. r♦ 't•r/IM\��•�T1.�b��Liir���.IAY.•�/• �..i�:t:•� •, i�•�'•i
It
i
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOTS 7. S. 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, IS, 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21 AND 22. AND THE UNNUMBERED LOT LYING
SOUTHEASTERLY OF THE SAID LOT 7 (ALSO KNOWN AS LOT 32). ALL BEING IN &LOCK 39, OF THE AMENDED PLAT
OF NEW BISCAYNE. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF. AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK "B". AT PAGE 16 OF THE
PUBLIC RECORDS OF DACE COUNTY. FLORIDA.
AND
LOT I. LESS A TRIANGULAR STRIP OF LAND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE III CORNER Of SAID
LOT 1. BLOCK 39. RUNNING THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF TIGERTRAIL AVENUE, ALSO KNOWN
AS TIGERTAIL AVENUE. 40 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. RUNNING THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH
SIDE OF TIGERTRAIL AVENUE. ALSO KNOWN AS TIGERTAIL AVENUE. 40 FEET TO THE CORNER OF TiGERTRAIL
AVENUE. ALSO KNOWN AS TIGERTAIL AVENUE AND TRADE STREET, THENCE RUNNING SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE
WESTERLY SIDE OF TRADE STREET 71 FEET, THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND ALL OF
LOTS 23, 24. 2S. 26, 27, 26, 29, 30 AND 31. BLOCK 39. OF NEW BISCAYNE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK "B". AT PAGE 16 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF CADE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
AND
LOTS 2. 3 AND A. IN BLOCK 39 OF AMENDED PLAT OF NEW BISCAYNE. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK I AT PAGE 16 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF•DAOE COUNTY. FLORIDA.
144 603 72 SQ FT. • 3.3R ACRES s NET AREA
EXHIBIT "A"
85 7'
♦ i.
DISCLCStSF;E OF 0wotsa
1. Legal description and street address of subject real property:
See attached Exhibit "A"
South Bayshore Drive at Aviation Avenue
2. Owner(s) of su'u`jefit real proms... d'percentage of ownership,
Note: City of Miami Ordinance No. 9419 requires disclosure of all parties
aving a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject
matter of.a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission.
Accordingly, question €2 requires disclosure of all shareholders of
corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties,
together with their addresses and proportionate interest.
Owner: Grove Bay Plaza, Ltd., a Florida LimitedPartnership
General Partner: Terremark at Bayshore, Inc. (20%)
Limited Partner: A.T.H. (curacao),N.V. (80%)
All c/o Robert H. Traurig
1401 Brickell Ave
Miami, Florida 33131
See attached Exhibit "B" for beneficial ownerships
. 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a)
owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b)-located within
375 feet of the subject real property.
none
0.
STATE OF FLORIDA ) SS:
COOIYPY OF DADE ) .
R
being duly
sworn, deposes and
says that ne is the
(Byer) (Attorney for Ourner) of
the real property
described in answer
to question ;1,
above; that he has
read the foregoing
answers and that the
same are true and
complete; and (if
acting as attorney
for owner) that he has authority to
execute this Disclosure of Ownership
foam on behalf of the
owner.
�
/
SM 4 M AM -q 7 r, RIBM
before me this 20th
OR day of _July' �3 4.
T YAAQRWA:
WNDED fHRU GE Ef(Pt? SULAY lE 1W
b5
Notary •i
P11b ic, State. of .
Florida at Large
SS--7z;
ly
M
/r� ::H a..y,,• rSt I z �':e.•.iry ••4,µt�riY*'d! :y�wr t'_��.w ,�M...yrr.�.r/ti.•.._: rr.;•`�... •a' •.i:i..,r-.-�.. ,wt��.•.• _ i..: .
.?�.• ... ..�.r .+•�hw• .... .r. :�:. ..�•i«. •J2� `r .•.L!J.:�'vy;•r' _J•. _. .t .. '... ...._�
41.
I
♦•
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
• i
t4
I
LOTS 7. e• 9. 10, 11, 12. 13. 14, 15. 16, 17, 18. 19, 20. 21 AND 22. AND THE UNNUMBERED LOT LYING
SOUTHEASTERLY OF THE SAID LOT 7 (ALSO KNOWN AS LOT 32). ALL ICING IN $LOCK 39, OF THE AMENDED PLAT
OF NEW BISCAYNE. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF. AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK "W', AT PAGE 16 OF THE
PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
AND
LOT 1. LESS A TRIANGULAR STRIP OF LAND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NE CORNER OF SAID
LOT I. BLOCK 39. RUNNING THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF TIGERTRAIL AVENUE. ALSO KNOWN
AS TIGERTAIL AVENUE. 60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. RUNNING THENCE NORTNEASTERLT ALONG THE SOUTH
SIDE OF TIGERTRAIL AVENUE, ALSO KNOWN AS TIGERTAIL AVENUE, 40 FEET TO THE CORNER OF TIGERTRAIL
AVENUE. ALSO KNOWN AS TIGERTAIL AVENUE AND TRADE STREET, THENCE RUNNING SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE
WESTERLY SIDE OF TRADE STREET 7; FEET. THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND ALL OF
LOTS 23, 24. 2S. 26. 27. 25. 29. 30 AND 31, BLOCK 39. OF NEW BISCAYNE. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK "$". AT PAGE 16 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY. FLORIDA.
AND
LOTS 2. 3 AND k. IN $LOCK 39 OF AMENDED PLAT OF NEW BISCAYNE. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK B AT PAGE 16 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF•OADE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
144 663 72 Sa FT. s 3 3? ACRES s NET AREA
EXHIBIT "A"
15
C r-
TERREMARK AT BAYSHOREr INC.
Owned 100% by Terremark Investment Services, Inc.
which is owned 100% by:
Manuel D. Medina
2600 S.W. Third Avenue
Miami, Florida 33129
A.T.H. (CURACAO)i N-V-
Owned 100t by Mr. Francis Lee Nyet Xhiong, as Trustee
(trust is a grantor trust with full power of appointment)
c/o, Joel Karp
3050 AmeriFirst Building
One S.E. Third Avenue
Miami, Florida 33131
t-. I"
LIM
S.W. a
w
wi
COCONUT GROVE
STATION a
F' F
GRAND AVE.
SUNSETNF
DR.
SOURCE:ADA
lfl
flu,
ST.
t ui in
i1i cy
> WN
(u
3c
co
L4
tol RICKENBACKER
wmmmw
CAUSEWAY —
PROJECT SITE
MCFARLANE RD.
FIGURE 12
L-EG-ENEY.
0 ROAD SEGMENTS
PROJECTED TO
OPERATE BELOW
PEAK —HOUR LOS"Cw
-Ncmcz= IMPACT AREA►
FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
(WITH PROJECT)
lJ
to the drive-in bank should be provided by the Applicant
to alleviate potential delay on Tigertati.
}1
Y am
b. Perkin
y' The Appl scant proposes to provide a six -level parking
s garage with 1,052 parking spaces, exceeding City
requirements by 441 spaces. Two percent of parking spaces
$,:.. would be reserved for the handicapped and five percent for
carpools/vanpoois. Five truck bays would also be provided
in accordance with City requirements.
c.
Mass Transit
Three local bus routes currently serve the project
nvicinity.
Also, the Coconut Grove Matrorail station is
located two-thirds mile from the project. Regular Shuttle
,
service, provided by the p+PP Iicant, should connect the
r
t,k.
project with the Coconut Grove station.
i.
d.
Future Traffic
the of project traffic to the roadway
r
With addition
�x
networko one additional road segment, Bird Avenue between
US 1 and SW 27th Avenue, would fall from LOS "C" to LOS
.T
Thus, thirteen roadway segments are projected to
g-
operate below LOS "C" at project bui Idout (Figure 12).
�-
59
_ r
- -
85-72;
f.a
k
r Toad = 3 4
-777777:7
�- r t 1F', s ` va -'` ,n ' C.Pa e r f,+ r .. T 1 " ;1 tz' ,� �t 7�'�it ,� ;i •-,
i
PART I - PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A. APPLICANT INFORMATION
Project Name: Terremark Centre
Applicant: Grov2600eS�WY Plaa, Ltd.
3rdZAvenue, Penthouse
Miami, Florida 33129
F t date of Acceptance of Application: July 25, 1984
Date of Receipt of Notice of Local Public Hearing: August 14, 1984 and
November 26, 1984
Deadline for Council Action: January 7, 1985
Date of Local Public Hearing: January 24, 1985
-`, Type of Development: Office/Retail/Residential
tJ`t Location of Development: Miami (Coconut Grove), Dade County
B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed Terremark Centre project Is located on the southwest
corner of Aviation Avenue and Bayshore Drive in Coconut Grove
t (Figure 1). The site is presently occupied by five two-story, one
six -story, and three tnree-story apartment buildings (Figure 2).
Approximately 274 persons reside in the 153 apartment units with
rental rates from $300 to $650 per month. In addition to the
residential structures, there are approximately 5,000 square feet of
offices on -site. All existing structures will be demolished before
construction of the Terremark Centre begins.
i
K
85-'72;
! 'S
FIGURE 1
LOCATION MAP
FIGURE 2
EXISTING SITE
CA SOURCE: ADA
kv
?: The proposed Terrem ark Centre (Figure 3) consists of a IS -story
office tower with ground floor retail facing Bayshare drive. The
office tower will be connected to a five level, 1,052 car parking
garage (four levels above ground, one level underground). Exercise
and recreational facilities will be located on the roof of the
parking garage. The office tower will contain 314,000 gross square
feet of office space and 8,000 gross square feet of ground -floor
f
retail space (Table 1). In addition, a row of 16
townhouse/apartment units will be constructed adjacent to the
parking structure, facing Tigertail Avenue.
TABLE 1
PR(1POSED DEVELOPMENT COMPONENT
Use
Office Tower
Office Spece
Retail Specs
Residential Space
Subtotal
Parking Garage (19052 spaces)
Recreational Level
Subtotal
TOTAL
SOURCE: ADA
Approximate
Gross Square Feet
314,900
8,000
19,200 (16 units)
341,200
333,300
50,400
383,700
724,900
An indoor galleria will serve as an entrance for pedestrians along
Bayshore drive, and introduce retail shopping at the street level.
The pedestrian walkways along the retail edge of the office building
will be sheltered by a covered arcade.
1,`
t
1
•
t:
js °$ �M4 Z t f .tti «t ✓ "1 v. t`a �w't ``S E ;l {,
�
d V • '� � ` 'ri � �'�{ l ; ` � 7 , � �4 ' ( #3'' �Ct" 4� , �'' � r��•,fYR ''�' y' .: yam' c"
iZ���i`., xi`�'§,.'�&ia�.� ..,. s.. ., . ,r« s rt .-,..� ... '�� � ::.:' .. .. � - ,x..� ...R'f �.A a.:':?R.r"•zc»"„i1�-�rt.�.4=�a �+��.�: Ka.tt� _
S
SOUTH
BAYSHORE
DRIVE
I t4
00
CA
IV
OFFICE TOWER
Mmmmr1r1r
FIGURE 3
PROJECT CROSS SECTION
PARKING GARAGE
IgiMll l/1�,
fllll. llll
TOWNHOUSES
TIGERTAIL
AVENUE
it .I is
10'
o `J2 0
SOURCE: ADA
2M
The 1,052 space parking garage will be accessed from Aviation
Avenue. There will be one entrance lane from Tigertail Avenue for
the drive-in bank and service area (Figure 4). The roof of the
garage will be constructed to offer Jogging, tennis, swimming,
racquetball, and other exercise facilities.
Project construction is anticipated in one phase, beginning in
mid-1985, with completion in mid-1986.
The project appears to be consistent with the generalized land uses
specified in the Miami 1974 Planning Study for Coconut Grove and
1976 Miami Comprehensive Plan. The 1974 Planning Study for Coconut
Grove designates the Terremark site as "High Density
Office -Residential" for the portion of the site adjacent to South
Bayshore Drive, and "Medium Density Multiple" (residential) for the
portion facing Tigertai I Avenue.
The 1976 Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, prepared in accordance
with the Local Government Comprehensive Planning Act, also
designates the portion of the site facing South Bayshore Drive as
"Residential/Commercial" and the portion facing Tigertail Avenue as
"Moderate Density Residential" (up to 24 dwelling units per acre).
The property is presently zoned RO-3/6 and RG-2/5 with the RG-2/5
portion overlain by the Special Public Interest (SPI) District 3.
7
TM
A
Says c 1
�,R yS .K.e,'•Y��.Y 4`�ht}mikr-
— `S�c`_3:SYGa .a:f✓.i..M� Y x....t'.. <: L.l t %t{... 4�, .. ` ev .... s_., ... _.... .d'.:�` . ., x.. :.. A-._ ,tr �. bas.'^'a`_.11_ Ir?t.4l. rL
i
FIGURE 4
. I
SITE ACCESS AND EGRESS LOCATIONS
W
11Mt10M �rt1YF
V
Z
uj
j,
'
.7a-
W
t,
1 to
sQ
Iwl•l
1
1
Iwo Iw
�.
1.
1}
+
( 1
\1 www 0w07w+
`� � 1 Aw�.w�w wwwwwwwwwwrwwwww rww �w � m ." �
ENTRANCE'
1 pRIVE THRU BANK' "�
oRoumD FLOOR PLAN
IV
According to the City, the existing toning allows Maximum
development as Shown in table 2.
TABLE 2
I' MAXIMLRM DEVELOPMENT WITH EXISTING 20NING
W.,
emu.
2oning Category
RG - 2/5 (Rear)
RO - 3/6 (Front)
TOTAL
i RetaII not permitted.
SOL) U City of Miami
MaximM Scuare Feet by Use
414,3OD residential
143,9go office end/or residential
192,290
The R/O zoning category was created by the City to encourage a mix
of office and residential along South Bayshore Drive. However,
office rental rates are generally much higher than residential
rents, consequently there is little incentive for developers to
construct residential buildings.
Recent development pressures in Coconut Grove prompted the Miami
Planning Department to prepare a Bayshore Drive Development Study in
November, 1984. The purpose of the study was to examine the proper
zoning required to control growth in the Bayshore Drive area of
Coconut Grove, while also addressing the need to provide parking for
the Dinner Key area given the City Commission's decision to prohibit
structured or decked parking on the Bay side of South Bayshore
Drive.
E
04
The study recommends that ail property between South Bayshore Drive
Fk"'' and Tigertai 1 Avenue, and between Mary Street and just northeast o
® Aviation Avenue (Figure 5) including the Terremark site, be rezoned
to RO-3/6, which would delete the RG-2/5 category presently
southwest of Aviation and southeast of Tigertai i . The study also
recommends that the present RO-3/6 ailowable floor space to lot
�.�
area, or floor area ratio (FAR), should remain at 1.21. Fb waver, to
provide for parking in the Dinner Key area, any development that
provides parking over the amount required to serve the development
would be entitled to receive a FAR bonus, if the excess parking is
available for public use.
On December 13, 19S4, the Miami Commission approved in principle the
Bayshore Drive Development Study and scheduled public hearings
before the Planning Advisory Board and the City Commission to
consider the rezoning recommendations in the Bayshore Study, as well
as the adoption of a Special Public Interest District (SPI-17:
South Bayshore Drive Overlay District) that would overlay the RO-3/6
zoning along South Bayshore Drive.
The SPI -17 overlay district, as proposed, implements the growth
controls suggested in the Bayshore Drive Development Study. The
i proposed SPI-179 like the Bayshore Study, reflects the policy
decision by the City to allow increased density along South Bayshore
Drive in exchange for public parking needed for Dinner Key.
10
65-'72;
IMF;
a
y' S 5T,
laih�l.
4fr
.b5~✓ i � �t�yt' �'�.�y �� i�' .. ?a 3. � ~ � 7 �y. ,{ '° , r � ,��F•<i �t� �.,. ��Yii �{y
FIGURE 5
PROPOSED ZONING
0
u
s ❑
BAYSHORE
SOURCE: CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT
y� d
'r alp
eQooa
m C3 El': Apo
[] Ll� Q �t
.Q � O
HE
1
Following is a brief summary of the provisions of the proposed
bt: Sp 1.-17 :
I
• To provide a transitional buffer between residential uses along
west Tigertail Avenue and office uses along Soutn Bayshore Drive,
the first 100 feet of lot depth adjacent to Tigertail Avenue
shall be either a landscaped yard area or residential uses no
higher than forty-five feet. Provided that residential
development occurs, ancillary and parking structures for
non-residential uses no greater in height than the residential
structures may be located below grade to witnin 20 feet of
Tigertail Avenue or above grade witnin 50 feet of Tigertail
Avenue.
e in response to the City decision to prohibit parking structures
In Dinner Key, the estimated shortage by 1990 of 650 parking
spaces (minimum) for the Dinner Key area is intended to be
provided by allowing a building density bonus for developers
along South Bayshore Drive if they provide more parking than is
required and make it available to the public. For every parking
space provided in excess of offstreet parking requirements, an
additional two hundred (200) square feet of floor area for any
use will be permitted, provided however:
JV
m
[I
a) There may not be less than one hundred spaces and tney must
be open to the general public during normal business or
operating hours of public activities or attractions at
Dinner Key or adjacent public facilities.
b) Parking fees shall not exceed those for public meterea
parking in the vicinity.
c) Entrance to the parking shall not be more than six hundred
(600) feet from a structure housing a major public facility
in Dinner Key.
d) The cumulative floor area permitted may not exceed 0.50
times gross lot area.
• No building in the district shall exceed a height of 250 feet or
22 stories in height, whichever is lower.
As previously proposed, the Terremark Centre was to have twin
towers: an office tower of 251,000 square feet and a residential
tower of 188,600 square feet (95 units). In addition, 16 townhouse
units were proposed. The proposal would have required a zoning
j change from RO-3/6 to RO-3/8 to allow for a FAR of 2.42, which is
twice that of any other Bayshore Drive development in Coconut Grove.
After meeting with Council staff, City staff, and Coconut Grove
13
Y"k Y
k Z
residents, the developer postponed DRI review until the Bayshore
Drive Development Study was completed. in December, 1984, the
developer scaled down project plans to be in conformance with the
new plan and revised the DRI Application for Development Approval
accordingly.
The Terremark proposal, with 341,200 gross square feet and a 1.71
FAR (with bonus), not including the garage structure, is in
conformance with the recommended Bayshore Drive Redevelopment Study
zoning recommendations and the proposed SPI-17 overlay district.
The portion of the development fronting Tigertail conforms to the
residential requirement, with garage and townhouse building height
no higher than 45 feet above average grade. A major special use
permit, which is required for all office buildings in the City over
200,000 square feet, will be required in addition to the zoning
changes.
14
r
r
f k v A i}}..
C
Y� ••
h ,
H
S
�y�
Ott
PART 11 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND ISSUES
A. ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES
1. Air
Complex source permits are no longer required by either the
Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (DER) or Dade
County Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) .
However, one- and eight -hour carbon monoxide concentrations
were estimated by the Applicant using computer modeling.
Concentrations of carbon monoxide were predicted at two
receptor points in the vicinity of the proposed Terremark
Centre. These points were selected to represent probable
locations of maximum carbon monoxide concentrations where human
exposure could be reasonably expected over one and eight hour
periods. Receptor 1 was located 50 feet west of Bayshore Drive
and 330 feet south of Aviation Avenue, and receptor 2 was
located 50 feet north of Aviation Avenue and 50 feet west of
Bayshore Drive.
The maximum one hour and eight nour predicted monoxide
concentrations were 7.5 parts per million (ppm) and 4.5 ppm,
respectively, which occurred at receptor 2 in 1987. The
concentrations do not exceed Florida Ambient Air Quality
15
85-'72;
-11
,4
standards of 35 ppm and 9 ppm for for one hour and eight hour
® • _ carbon monoxide concentrations, respectively.
The impact of the Terrem ark project on ozone concentrations has
5. been raised by several citizen groups in Coconut Grove. Dade
y the U.S. Environmental Protection
County has been designated b
Agency as a "non -attainment" area for ozone because ozone
levels have exceeded National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) established by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970.
Ozone is a colorless irritant formed when emissions containing
hydrocarbons and other gases, primarily from motor vehicles,
but also from other sources, react witn sunlight. In Dade
County, it is estimated that approximately 73 percent of all
hydrocarbon emissions produced in 1980 came from mobile sources,
primarily highway vehicles. The remainder was generated by
stationary sources, such as utility installations and service
and manufacturing facilities, as well as natural biogenic
sources such as plants and trees.
A meterological phenomenon referred to as the " seabreeze
effect", produces high ozone concentrations in coastal areas.
Ozone precursors such as hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides
produced by motor vehicles and other sources are transported
offshore, usually in the morning.
16
These gases then react wi to
OW
L-11
sunlight and drift shoreward as ozone in the afternoon, under
the influence of an easterly wind.
The "seabreeze effect," as described above, is currently being
studied in both Dade and Bro ward counties through the use of
coastal ozone monitoring stations. Dade County now has coastal
monitoring stations on Virginia Key and at Haulover Beach, and
will have a third coastal station at Purdue Medical Center (SW
87tn Avenue and Old Cutler Road) by the first quarter of 1985.
No violations or exceedances of the federal ozone standard have
been observed in Dade County since December, 1982, and the
County may be designated as an "attainment area" by mid-1985 if
there continue to be no exceedances of NAAQS for ozone. The
primary causes for the decreased concentrations are new vehicle
emission standards, bus improvements, Metroraii, and other
transportation -related management strategies.
Since the additional vehicle trips generated by new
construction in the Region since December, 19B2 have not caused
an increase in ozone concentration, vehicle trips generated by
the Terremark project should not cause a significant increase
in ozone levels in Dade County. An ozone monitoring station on
or adjacent to the Terrem ark site is not justified and would be
of little or no benefit in monitoring the impact of
17
65-'72r
t 4 r"•
r
'
rt
Terremark-generated traffic because i ) two ozone monitoring
stations located within five Miles of the project are now of,
will be In operation before Terremark construction begins ano
2) hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides produced by vehicles take 3
to 5 hours to react with sunlight to form ozone, therefore,
ozone produced by Terremark-generated vehicle trips would
l
rarely be detected near the Terremark site because of
- I e
prevailing winds.
Although significant adverse Impact on air quality will not
occur, the following actions by the Applicant would minimize
increases in carbon monoxide and other air pollutants from the
project:
• designate five percent of employee parking spaces, locateo
as close as possible to elevator or building entrances
(except for handicapped -designated spaces), for exclusive
car or van pool use.
• actively encourage and promote car ana van pooling by
establishing a car pool Information program, and by offering
preferred parking spaces and work shifts to car and van
7T
Ak
Olt
actively encourage and promote transit ridership by
providing regular shuttle service between the project and
the Coconut Grove Metroraii station.
_ • provide Metrobus, Metroraii, and shuttle service route and
:f f
schedule information in convenient locations throughout the
project.
2. Land, Flood Prone Areas, and Wetlands
The 3.3 acres of the project site are presently developed with
rise residential
primarily low - structures. Approximately 6,500
cubic yards of material will be removed from the site as part
of site clearing.
The subsurface soil conditions were tested by the Applicant
this year. Generally, soil beneath the site consists of
sandstone with sand and limerock.
According to the soil test engineering report, the subsurface
s conditions of the site should pose no unusual limitations or
constraints to the proposed development. Pressure -injected
pilings will be used for construction of the tower and the
garage structure. Percolation was tested as + 5 minutes for 3
Inches of water.
19
85-'72•
If dust problems occur during land clearing or construction,
xt- .
the Applicant proposes periodic sprinkling or wetting of the
subgrade surface. Erosion caused by overland flow of water
k'
should be minimal because the site is graded relatively f 1 at,
r
r'w and the soil percolation rate is good.,
r-
The proposed development is located within three separate flood
zones. The portion of the site located closest to Biscayne Bay
S,J
is inside Zone A-14 of the Federal Insurance Administration
(FIA) Rate Maps for 100-year flood. The minimum required first
floor elevation for this area is 11.0 feet NGW. The rest of
r ect falls into Zone B (500-year f i ood) and Zone C ( area
the p of
of minima{ flooding potential). The Dade County 10-year storm
ir
flood criteria of 5.0 feet NGW applies in Zones B and C.
The first floor of the office tower will be set at 12.0 feet
NGW, one foot above the minimum elevation required by the FIA.
Entrance to the parking level will be above 15.0 feet NGW .
However, the actual floor elevation of the underground parking
will be three feet below the Dade County flood criteria of 5.0
feet NGW for a 10-year storm. While the lower parking level
will be below County flood elevation, the entrance to the
garage wi I 1 be at least 10 feet above the County 10-year storm
criteria. This elevation is outside the 100-year flood zone
and therefore little stormwater should enter the garage. A
20
r
-
��,rti;i
AW
Submersible Sump pump wl I I be IMS+aI led to remove washdown
water and Storm water that might enter the lower garage level.
The pump will direct the water to a Swale with a raised Inlet
to provide overflow Into the project drainage SYS+Smt If
necessary.
i
3. Waters brain_ get and Hazardous materials
_
The salt barrier line generally runs along Bayshore Drives
therefore, the Aquifer east of Bayshore Drive is saline. The
entire Terremark site Is within the 19000 part per million
(ppm) chloride isochlor, which indicates that groundwater
benea+n +ne site Is brackish to saline, although a shallow
freshwater lens may be present near tne top of the Aquifer.
to Dade County Depar+ment of Environmental Resource
According
uld not be used f
Management, groundwater beneath the site sho or
human consumption or Irrigation. There are no surface water
bodies on -site. BiscayneBay, a State Aquatic Preserve, Is
located less tnan one block east of the project site.
The existing drainage system on -site disposes of stormwater by
slab -covered trenches, Infiltration through pervious areas, ana
discharge to the adjacent roadways, which subsequently
discharge through the City storm sewers directly Into Biscayne
Bay. Direct discharge Into +ne Bay, wl+hOu + retention, Is
undesirable and no longer permitted for new drainage systems
21
135-72;
L
because nutrients and pollutants are transported by stormwater
N runoff Into the Bay.
The proposed Terremark drainage system will be designed to
handle a 5-year storm event of unspecified duration, with an
intensity of 6.2 inches per hour, as required by Dade County.
Estimated maximum runoff from this storm is 18.53 cubic feet
. per second, while the drainage system has been designed with a
capacity of 31.2 cubic feet per second. Consequently, no
runoff from the design storm is expected to leave the site.
All runoff from roof and ground surfaces during the design
storm will be routed to sedimentation boxes. Injection pumps
will then pump the runoff into one of four on drainage
wells which discharge into the lower saline levels of the
Biscayne Aquifer. The Applicant has proposed to route parking
k 7
garage washdown water, which contains more pollutants and is
{ •P,
highly concentrated than runoff from other on -site
sf
more
impervious surfaces, to a grassed swa i e with a raised catch
basin. Because the operator can decide when the garages wi I I
be washed down, overflow from the swale to the raised catch
77
basins should rarely, if ever, occur. Al i catch basins wi I ! be
}
designed to retain oil and grease before stormwater is routed
to sedimentation boxes and, subsequently, drainage wells
22
Y J �_�-M� i j...r�,. 4 �.V 1 � }}t 4 S t � � �. ; - }.. "Ny � ywL4d�,.'�� �d�-,FX• Y r ^g� .VF" fy:
'i'"x lc st• h { 1 '• a-:. t ( S *4tjLL �i.r.�u'4}�.'..h•?'hey 34:
5.,f< r � 4f a:yt��„
i
Table 3 shows the estimated pollutant loadings for the existing
and proposed developments. Existing loadings are based on
stormwater runoff disposal as follows: 70 percent of runoff to
slab -covered trenches, 20 percent by infiltration through
pervious surfaces, and 10 percent discharged into Biscayne Bay.
The loading rates for the existing development are from the
Broward County 208 multi -family category. Loading rates for
the proposed development (commercial)* were calculated based on
3.32 acres of impervious area plus 7.6 acres of parking area.
Allowing all parking garage washdown water to percolate through
a vegetated Swale will remove at least 90 percent of the
pollutants listed below.
TABLE 3
ESTIMATED POLLUTANT RUNnFF LOADS
(Pounds per Year)
Total Total Suspenceo
Nitrogen Phosphorous BOD Solids
Existing Development 26 1 53 704
Proposed Terremark Center (no Swale)* 82 7 502 5,856
Proposed Terremark Center (with Swale)* 23 2 140 1,645
+� Tne loadings for the roof and other exposed surfaces were assumed to be
half of the commercial loading rate applied to the parking garage.
SMpCE: ADA, SFRPC, Broward 209 Plan
* Tne commercial loading rates used
In Table
facewere
taken
king ofrom
. aTUSGS
study of a commercial development
he
parking lot was open to settlement of suspended airborne pollutants
as well as introduction of fertilizers spread over landscaped islands.
Given the proposed parking garage at Terremark, nutrient and pollutant
loads will be lower tnan the estimates show. However, the parking lot
used for the USGS study was vacuum swept tnree times a week, which may
compensate for part of the over -estimation described above.
23
85-72;
C a'
Tne drainage system for the proposed Terrenark Centre should
reduce the adverse impact of runoff from the site on water
quality in Biscayne Bay, because runoff from the site will no
longer be directly discharged to the bay. By incorporating
grassed swales to cleanse parking garage washdown water, the
Impact of the project on ground and surface waters will be more
favorable than comparable developments. To further reduce the
possibility of adverse impact on water quality, the parking
garage should be vacuum swept before every washdown. Finally,
the Applicant should reconstruct the drainage system for
Aviation Avenue, from South Bayshore Drive to Tigertai I Avenue,
as part of the road improvements described in Part IID below.
The new system should be designed to manage runoff from a
5-year storm by retaining the first 1.5 inches of runoff in
french drains, witn overflow from the design storm runoff
discharging to Biscayne Bay. This type of system will retain
the most polluted first flush of runoff in french drains,
thereby preventing it from discharging to Biscayne Bay. If
french drains are not feasible because of underground utility
constraints, a drainage well system capable of managing the
5-year storm should be constructed. Tnese improvements will
reduce the impact of storm water runoff pollution in Biscayne
Bay and complement the drainage improvements currently being
done by the City at the intersection of Tigertail and Aviation
Avenues.
24
14
IL
Another source of water pollution, potentially even more
,s
harmful than stormwater runoff, Is hazardous materials.
Hazardous waste is defined by the U.S. Environmental Protection
5
s
Agency and the State as waste that is ignitable, corrosive,
reactive, or toxic. Table 4 is a list of Standard Industrial
k,
Classification (SIC) codes for facilities that have been found
to produce one or more of the hazardous wastes listed in Table
5. These lists are excerpted from the Florida Water Quality
Assurance Act regulations, and all facilities that fall within
these SIC codes are required by the Act to provide information
regarding types and amounts of wastes generated at the facility
and how this waste is being managed.
)`
�y5 Yyi
Several of the SIC codes listed by the Applicant as potential
occupants of the Terremark project are included in the list o
=E:
r>
potential hazardous waste generators in Table 4. For example,
k
research and development labs and photofinishing labs, which
-.
.
are potentiai mall quantity hazardous wastes generators, are
listed as potential occupants of Terremark. The Applicant has
proposed to cover loading areas to exclude rainwater, with
_-
impervious floors (without drains) sloped towards catch basins
.$may
or depressions for detention and clean up of spills.
� 2 1
incorporation of the following additional measures as
�A
-
conditions in any development order issued wi I i further reduce
the possibility of adverse impact on water quality:
25
SS-'72;
i s — r ,�: }
s ; rfi ••x
y
1
{
d
r
FAHLL n LIST OF POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE
Sic
Sic Waste ??pro Description code —
oils
ARC
Corn
0111
ARC
Cettem
Oil!
ARC
Tebacre
9113
ARC
Bolger Crops
0161
ARC
Vegetable and Metes farmers
fill
ARC
Berry Crops
0114
ARC
Cittee Trait Growers
silt
ARC
Ormemestal fleviceltert 6 Margery Predecto
0191
ABC
coastal farms. primarily Crop
sill
ARC
Ref Cattle ►eedlets
Beef Cottle. except Feedlots (e.g.. Rosthes)
0212
0214
ABC
ARC
shisp and Ceet farms
0291
ARC
General Livestock
011l
AICT
Soil Preparation services
0711
ASCT
Crop ►lenties. Cultivation. and Pretetties
9122
LFWT
Crop sa►vestins. Primarily by Machine
0724
T
Cotten Ciesims
0729
AT
General Crop Services
0751
A
Livestock services. except services for Animasl
specialities
0792
A
Loon and Carden services
0791
AT
Ornomestal Shro► and Tree Services
0911-0951: WONtSTNT
0111
AlIC
Tifaber Tracts
0821
ABC
forest Norseries 6 Tree Seed eetherint 6
tatracting
OBSI
ABCT
foreetry services
1611-17": CONS low
1611
LPWRT
Nighw7 04 street Cometeaeties
1622
LWwIT
arias@. Teasl and tls•ated sighway Caastructien
1711
PT
plumbing. skating (except electric) and Air
Conditioning
lift
JILT
hiaties. paper 1langims. me 0eceratiag. Nea•y
Cewstructisn, NEC
1141
LT
Terreste. Tile. Notble. and Noosie Work
1152
JILT
floor 1.0716g end Other ►leorwerk. IMC
otsch isdsetry has been identified me a potential sewerater of hstardess was
ew the basis thst the industry any overrate corrosive. reactive. ilgwitably.
and/or tonic Wooten. for @%empt*. get code 0711. Roil Preparation Services.
is a petential generator of toxic pesticide wastes. taeh SIC code listed in
.able 1 has previously boom documented in the literstere an a tetewtial
sesereter of hstardowe Waste.
GENEKA 1 UKS E3Y i I C CUUE
Waste Types 0seteiptiew
1761
LT
Reefing end !heat Metes York
Intl
LT
close and Ginning Verb
179.
LP117?
tneavatime and Foundation Verb
1799
JRLPWT
Special Trade Contractors
2012-1999• IMNOFACTOR/NC 10BOST11Its
201:
Ceased specialties
2091
Conned and Cored Fie% and Seafood's
2211
L,4
stood Wa•on Fabric "ilia. Wool
22i1
LM
wowns fail LvngtIt and usve Revive?
7252
LM
Nosier•. except Wowtt`t Boll Length 6 tare Length
2251
Lot
unit Owterweer Melly
2?S4
LM
unit Underwear Mtlse
225?
LN
Ctrceler twit fabric "isle
7:SR
L`t
Warp unit Fabric Mille
�1
22%9
LM
Rnittins Mille. KC
2261
LM
finishers of Bread wesen fabrics of Cotten
LM
rtniabere of less# wevee fabrics of Man -Made
2262
fiber and silk
L'i
finishers of Broad Weveo fobriet. Maw-Nsdr Fiber
2269
end Silk
2711
LM
Woven Carpets and Rage
2772
Lei
Tufted Carpets and sags
2779
LM
Carpets and suss. RC
2414
JRLT
wood uitchon Cabinets
2431
JILT
Nordwood fester and plywood
7416
Jut?
Softwood tenerr on# plywood
?tSl
JILT
JRLT
Nobisv Nerves
Prefabricated Veal 9wildinse end Components
245:
2491
N
Mond Preserving
249?
LTT
JRL41
PsrticlebearA
Wood Neuoehold ►orwita►a. except Upholstered
lSII
7514
NLOPQ
metal Nowevhold Forwitore
2517
001
wove TV and Radio Cabinets
7519
JILMT
Noosehetd forwitare. PIC
2521
JRLMT
woad Office Iorwitere
2541
�sOffice, Formiters,
lS41
JKLN1
JRLMT
Bortitions, aatd ►inturee
7W
NI2N1►Q
Metal partitions and filters*
1611
LN►TT
lair Mille r kilts
raper Mills. ancept tlailejoe, Pere
2621
L"PTT
3611
LaIPTT
Paparbooed Mille
2641
ILP
Popov Coating and giggles
2641
iLP
sets. except Tenths, seat and Wrdboorl
I
2645
ILP
Div -cot Paper and Ve
2446
ILP
Pressed and "vIded Pulp Comes
P►oducta. I'll
2649
iL►
Converted Paper and paperboard
2651
ILP
Welding Paperboard sears
2652
1L►
pet -up, Paperboard Bests
and SolidFiber loses
2651
ILP
Correlated
Net - Not elsewhere classified
Y
7
I.
v
h
3�
t
.T
u
n
7 i i�14
H
"L
Sic
Yaste Tyres
Description
code
26%
i0T
senite►y few Cootsiorre
fiber Cans. Taboo. 1lrues. and Similar products
26SS
2661
IL►T
LN►TT
building fsper end Building Board mills
2111
NILOPQ
Newspapers: Publishing and printing
2121
WILOPQ
Periodicals, Publishing 6 Printing
MI
WILOPQ
Beets: Publishing and ►rintiog
fill
WILOPQ
Doak ►rioting
Commercial Printing. Letterpress and Screen
1151
2752
NiLOPQ
WiLO►Q
Commercial Printing. Lithographic
2153
IIKO/Q
Eogrovisg sod Plate foisting
2754
NiLOPQ
Commercial Printing. Gravure
2761
NiLOPQ
Menifeld Business forms
2111
NILOPQ
Greatiog Card Publishing
Bl/skbeeks. Loe*elesf Bioders. cod Devices
!1R!
V119
MILO►Q
KILO►Q
soekbisdiss and Belated York
2191
WILOPQ
Typesetting
2812
T
Alkalies ad Chlorine
2816
►OPT
inorganic Pigments
M o
►O►QRST
Industrial Inorganic Chemicals. NEC
2821
LMiT
Plastics. Materials. Synthetic Resins. end
Wen-selcanigable Elestesers
loll
LIM
synthetic Rubber
2823
LMTT
Cellulosic Nan -Muds piers
synthetic Organic fibers, axcept Cellulosic
2924
L11TT
21)1
Biological ►radects
2937
Wedicioele and Botanical•
2914
L►
Pharmaceutical preparation.
Joel
►LM1T
Soap and Other Detergent*. except Speciality
2642
ALM►TT
Cleaner*
specialty Cleaners. Polishes. and Sanitation
►reparat ions
2042
PLVITT
surface Active Agents. Finishing Agents.
sultasetd Oil*. and Aesistsnts
2044
/LTT
Parrwsrs. Cosmetics. and Other Toilet Preperstions
21151
FCLXPT
Point sad Allied Products
2861
LM/TT
Gas and good Chemicals
Cyclic (Coal Ter) Crrdta. and Cycles
lR6S
T
Dyta, and Organic pigments andyclic loners)
1869
LNPTT
industrial Organic Chemicals. WEC
tot)
Nitrogenous fertilitars
1919
ABCLMT
pesticide and Agricultural Chemicals. WEC
1991
Adhesives sd Seelent*
2992
Explosives
2193
►CLN►
Printing lsh
1099
LMOPTY
Chemical preparation/
2911
T
►etreleas Refining
T
Asphalt felts "a Coatings
I
T
Lubricating Oil* saw Greases
1!
Products of Petroleus and Coal. WEC
19
T
Jtl1T
miecellaseous plastic Products
W1L
Leather Tanning and ►ieiahing
� �
Qtt • Not elsewhere
classified
SIC 1leste Types Description
code
MI
)ISI
7144
)161
71i1
)1�7
7199
7211
)251
I?%)
)1S1
)26:
7:6 )
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
►T
JR L
JKL
JK L
JRL
JRL
Jf.
JRL
T
LT
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
3 341
T
WI
NLMO►QT
) )S)
NLMOMT
7354
WL"PFW
MS
NLMO►QT
7356
NtM?QT
7357
W1J10pQT
7)61
T
1169
T
1398
WLNOPQT
7399
RLMM Y
3411
WLMO/QT
3412
WLllo►QT
3421 NLMO►Q
Roots 6 Shea Cut Start 6 finding*
Luther Gloves 6 M.ttens
llown's footwear. except Athletic
I-exaBe
Yomen'a Wasdbsss 6 Purses
personal Leather Goods
Leather Goods. IIEC
Fiat Glass
arieb sod Structural Clay Trie
Ceramic Vail and floor Tito
rrtreoue China Plumbing ristuTea Ind Bathrao-
Accessories
•itreous China Tabl• and Kitchen Article
►cne tarthenwsre (Yhitewart) Tsbtr 6 Rttche•.
Articles
porcelain Electrical Sup►lies
pottery products. WIC
Abrasive products
Gaskets. ►ectins and Sestios Devices
Blest farnseve. Steel Yorks. end Rotlinp oliilr
Electroeetellarsical Product*
Steel Yire Drawing and Steel Wsi/s and Spikes
Cold Roiled Steer Sheet. Strip. and Bars
Steel Pipe and Tubes
Grey Iran foundries
malleshle iron foundries
Steel foand►ies. NEC
primary Smelting and Retiniog of Lend
primary Smelting and Refining of Zcnc
Primary Production, of Uueinue
Primary Smelting and Refining of Nonferrous
metals. NEC
Secondary Smelting and Refining of Nenfrrr,w•
Hotels
Rotting. Braving and Extruding at Copper
Aluminum Sheet. Plate and foil
Aluminum Extruded Products`
Alwsinue Rolling end Brewing. WEC
selling. Drawing and Extruding of Wenferrouv
Metol, Except Copper and Aluminum,
Drawing end inowletins of Wonferreve wire
Aivainue foundries (Costingsl Bross. sooner. Copper cod copper Base Alton
Foundries
Nonferrous too dries (Castings). NEC
metal West Treating
Primary Metal /redects. WEC
Netal Cans and /ails
Metal Shipping serrele. Buss, Ross.
(Drwe Refinishing)
Cut lore
SIC Watt# Types Description
Code Code Waste types Description
3471 Need and use Toole. Except Machine Toole and 7567
Nand Saws NL40PQ Air and Cat Compressors, 367S mtJID►QT Need Saw 6 Sw /lades )S67 NL rrQ Slower and t sreailefism Tons
Aa11 Nll1OiQT Hardware. NEC 1567 NLlMPr)V industrial Protest Furnace a Downs
761E NLNb/0 tasseled iron and Metal Sanitary, were 1S69 NIXnP T M•ehsniral
N'12 HIJN►/Qr Plumbing Tinter# Fittings and Tria (Steel Goods) 357.1 Nt"n p� General IMep trialrNaehinwr7andutpwent, tptc
.
7431 NLMOPQT Nesting Equipment. Except Electric and Yarn Alt 1574 NL%Inrq Eleetronie Campvtin [ ri $m+nr, ME,
►urneett NL'IMQ • q� pment
Calculating • Accounting Noehints. txeept
f641 "tMPQT ►olprieated Structural metal 3S79 Electronic Equipment
IAi2 N1J111►pT metal Doers. Sea%. Trash $. moldings. and Trims ISM; pL ro Office Mschiwer. NEC
3W WIMP" Fabricated plate Work QT Commercial Laundr Dr
A«r. NI�IO/QT Sheet metal York .MOHachinet
I• T Cleawiwg, and /►eari�r
A466 NIiQT ` Architectural and Ornamental Metal work lS1S NL`lt+1p Air conditioning
NA N1110IQT prefabricated metal buildings and C and Yard Air espostingRefrigeration
Equipment
1669 NLM PQT miscellaneous metal Work S omponents end Equipment
Commercial and industries Refrigeratren
AiSI MutDIQT ISRy NLNO►Q [quipm►nt
Screw Machine ►rodecto l��o NL•tt+►p Ntaou►rng and Dispewtiwg pumps
AiS2 NLNt)pQT Bette. Nuts. screws. Rivets. and Weaker@ 159. NLNO Service Industry Nechints. N[C
K62 NU10►p► Irew and Steel ►orgings 7599 TOT Carburetors. pistons. piston Ringo • Valve•
)i6S NLMOiQT Autesative St Hon/q. Machiner
3469 MU10ppT N►tws• )ill? Nl`M►pT f. Eneepe Electrical. NEC
Motel Stampings. NEC 7611 NUtn►p power. Distribution and Specialty T►ansfurawrs
3471 NLMO/QT Electroplating. polishing. plating. Aweditins. 3671 NLNO► Switchg#er and Switchboard A
and Coloringp ""tots 6 Generators Apparatus
�iT9 MLMO 16:2 NLMVIp industrial Controls
3412 taetime. togro•ies. end Allied Services. NEC 3621 NLNO/Q
Small Area Ammunition )62i Welding Apparatus. Electric
3'11 Mnuwitiew. axetpt for lyll Arm. NEC NL40/Q Carbon G Graphite
IA1• Ordnance and Accessories. NEC 7629 pLyp/Q Electrical IndustrialAppa
lsll NLXOPQ Steos. Gas. and Nydrewlic Turbines 161' NL4PPQ Apparatus, Rome NEC
I67. Household Refrigerators and Nano and fare Freerers
3519 Nt)10FQT Internal Canbmstion Engines. NEC NVOPQ Electric Nauaewares and Fans
1523 NLMO/QT Fars Machinery and Equipment 1616 NLN�op Sowing 1524 HUIO►Qy 1670 NL•10►p t Nachints
)SAT NIJIOFpT Garden Tractors G Leun 6 Garden Equipment 36.61 1louseho)d Appliances. NEC
Construction machinery and Equipment NL�O/p Electric Lamps
3532 RL"O"T Miwiwg Nachiwtry and tgmi )641 NLMn/Q Current -Carrying Vitt Devices,
1313 OLMOpQT Oil ►itld Machinery and Equipment. Oil yield 1646 NLNNOOPQ Residential Electric Lighting Distorts
)SIS MLMO►Q COnVe ere and conveying Equipment 76a6 p Commercial. industrial. and Institutional
1337 MLIID � y� 1 � Anent
►QT Industrial trucks. Tractors, trailers. and )6i7 Lighting Fixtures
stockers 1651 NLNO/Q Vehicular Lighting Equipment
3UI NLM PQT metstoc teem•. Motet Cutting NL"PQ Radio a Ttltwision Receiving Sett
3542 NLMOiQT NLNO/Q
3544 NLMbFQT Mee%MLMO►p iwt Toole. metal parsing 166.1 phenegrsp% Records and Ire-ratordwd' N nwtic To
Special bite and Toole. bit Sets. Jigs and Radio and Television Tre"maitting. SiltnatinR, s?Peg
ASiS MJMPQT Fixtures. and Industrial Mello 1674 NUOPPQ Detweriew Equipment and Apperetas
Machine Tool Accessories A Measuring Devices 1675 NLNO semiconductor• and Related Devices
ASi6 NLNDPQT power Driven Mend Toole FQ Electronic Capacitors
1Si9 NI1bfQT metal Working Machinery. NEC 1677 NLMOPQT Electronic Ca"*-Trawaf
ASSI NUIp )679 NLNO►p Electronic components. orstre• and Other Mndvctors
3SS2 NLNOP" Tar Products Machinery 1691 N/W NEC
)SSA 11UtO/QT
Textile Neehiwery 1692 N/Q Storegt lotteries ISSs MllIO/QT Woodworking Machinery 117primary Rattorive Dr s Motor Vehicles and pagee t
Vot
ASSS paper 1Muatriea Maehintry 3714 NLMO►QT Car ledits
gU1e1
/pT printing Trades Machinery end Equipment 3716 M1ltt► Motor Vehicle Fart$ and Accessories
AS% MLMO/QT Special industry Machinery. NEC ro Motor Romeo
NI110►QT rumps and )721 NLROPQ Aircraft
3162 NIJ00PQT oiler s equipment 1726 NLROFQT Aircraft Engines and Engine tarts
Roll and Roller Bearings
NLMPQT Aircraft Parts and Ausiar Equipment. NEC • Net elsewhere classified 772N il/ 9 pwent, NFi
;t
M
5
�t
r,
HIM
J
sic Waste Types Description
Code
MI
1117
)all
3822
3921
3821,
1182s
3629
3812
3041
3842
1841
lost
1s61
1911
1911
1914
1915
1961
1964
1991
1995
1999
6011
4111
4011
4119
4121
4111
4151
4172
Mulorm
ship Building and Repairing
OL"DPQT
seat Building and Repairing
twgimeerieg. Scientific. Laboratory and Research
MUmpQ
Instruments
Aotemstic Controls for Btselatiwt Residential alga
RU10PQ
commercial twsirenarwts and Appliances
NUIOPQ
ledustrial lestruarwte for Messering. Display. slid
central of process variables. and Related
Products
totalities Void Ilttees slid Counting Devices
W1MPQ
11119OPQ
Instrumate far Nesserisg Red Testing of
electricity Red Metric Signals
N1JIOPQ
Nessurisg sea Controlling Devices. MEC
RLNO►Q
Optical Iestrumewte and Lease• talus
Surgical and Medical lwstrusrwts and Applieecet
WtXnPQ
Orthopedic, prosthetic. and Sergical App
NLNOPQ
and Supplies
NLNDp
""tottgsipaent sea Se►pliss
RUwOpQ
Ophthalmic Goods
photographic [Fitment ant supplies
RIJ1Op
NUWFQ
Watches. Clocks. etc.
MLMOpQT
Jewelry. Precious Metal
l V
Silverware. plated Wsre. and stain luaa ste�orkart
NUIOPW
NJLMOPQ
leveler's Findings 6 Materials 6 Lapidary
NJRUIOPQ
costume Jewelry and Cestesr Novelties. except
NJRIJIDPQ
precious Metal
Needles. pins. Nooks Rnd eyes. and Similar
Motion•
RIJRIJIOPQ
signs and Advertising 919pl876
RJRLNopQ
NJRLNOPQTT
Burial caskets
Nswufattering industries
4011-4959: TRANSPORTATION AND 1M11LIC UTiLIMS
JRLTT
Railroads. List-Novl Operating
LpWT
Local and subar►en Transit
JRLTT
switching 6 Terminal [eta►lishsenta
LpWT
Local Passenger Trentportation. NEC
L""
L"IT
Taxicabs
Intercity and glare, Nigbvsy passenger
Traneportation
LPWT
school sweet
Naintenowee service Facilities for Meter vthielt
T
Passenger Transportation
itheut storage
4212
JtLPUT
Local Trecktng w
Trucking. txcept Local
4211
14
JRLpWT
JRL""
Local Trucking with stores@
I
JRFTT
Truckling Terminal Facilities
Postal Service (vehicle Nsimtteance 011117)
"I
JtLPWT
D.S.
Deep Sea Foreign Transportation
4f11
1
T
Marise cargo Rsndling
Water transportation Services. MEC
�Tt69
(IINEC
JRLTWT
.
Not elsewhere
classified
Sic
code
Waste Type#
Description
4511
T
Air transportation. Certificates Carriers
45s?
T
Airports and Flying Ptetde
4561
LTT
Airport Terwiwat Service*
4617
JxLpr
Crude Petroleum pip► Lives
4611
JRLPTT
$*failed ►etralewa Pope Lines
4419
JxL►T
Pipe Lines. NEC
4A11
LT
Telrphene Communication (Wire or Rsdrol
4111:
LT
Radio Broadcasting
4911
LT
Television Broodcasting
4911
T
Electric services
4911
T
tleetricat 4 Other Services
49)"
T
Cat 6 Other Services
4 919
T
Cosbinatien Utitities. NEC
4942
T
Sewerage Syatems
495)
T
Refuse Systems
4959
ABCT
Sanitary Services. "EC
5091-5198: VNOLESALt TRADE
son]
T
screw 6 Waste Materiels. Vftelesete
5161
L►Tf
Chemicals alga Alliedprefect• Wholesale
5191
A
form Supplies
5198
JKLT
points. Tarnishes, and' Supplies
5211-5984: RETAIL TRADE
5:11
JWLT
Point. Clots. sod Ilallpoper Stores
5.151
AJRT
hardware Stores
5:71
JRL►
Mobile Now Dealers
5111
AIJRT
Departsrnt Stores
S199
AIJRT
M.sceileweave General Nerehendiee Stores
5511
LPWY
Motor vehicle Dealers (Now 6 Usedt
5521
LAWS'
Motor vehicle Dealers (Deed Only)
5511
LtW
Auto 6 home supply Stores
5541
LFWT
Gasoline Service Stations. Retail
5551
LPWT
Bost Dealers
5571
L►WT
Motorcycle Dusters
5599
LM
Automotive Dealers. WC
3722
Messehold Appliance Stores. Retoil
5962
LT
Automatic Merchandising Mechine Operator*
5982
T
Feel 6 tee Btetere
59e1
T
Pori Oil Dsotero
59e4,
T
Lillatfiud rotrol"M'Cat 90101ere
7215-8091: SERViCtS iIIDUSTRiES
Ms
LN
Coin Operated tsuwfrius and Der Cfeanirwg
7716
LM
Dry Claiming Plants'. taeept Rug Cleaning
72I7
LM
Carpet and Upholstery
M 11
LM
indettrial Launderers
7261
LT
rune►aT Service* and Cremsteriea
7112
IJRLT
Outdoor Advertising Services
I�`II��II'I�ill ± ��� '` �ill�IlliilY� �Yil�drli�i
tic Waste Types Description
Code
Advertising. RtC
Direct flail Advertising services
siwprint aad Photocopying services
Commercial Photosrophr Art. end Craphice
Disinfecting and tstermination services
Clooning and Maintenance services to Dwellings
and ether swildiegs. WC
Research omd Development Laboratories
Photgfinishieg Laboratories
Cemmertial Testieg Laboratories
Fire tatieguisher Charging Services
Passenger Car Rental and Loosing. without
Drivers
TrmeII Rental and Lessisg. without drivers
WtilitF Trailer and Recreational Vehicle Rental
Top and Rey Repair she". Automotive
Tire Retreading and Repair shape. Automotive
Paint shove. Automotive
Amoral Automotive Repair use"
Automotive Repair !hope, RtC
Wig A Television Repair Shops
Rstrigerstiee A Air Conditioning Service l;
Repair Shope
aloctrical a tlectromie Repair Shops. IMC
Watch. Clock. and Jewelry Repair
Rewphelstery and Furniture Repair
Welding Repair
Armature Rovinding Shope
Repair shape and Related services, 11M
(including Taxidermists)
servicee Allied to lotion picture Production
Theatrical Fradocero (except Motion Pictures) and
Miscalloneous Theatrical services
Public Coll Courses
Cain-Operat&d Amwsement Devices
Amusement Forts
Amueement we Reereatioa services. WC
Cenerel Medical and Surgicei Rospitale
specialty hospitals. except Psychiatric
Medical Laboratories
Dental Laboratories
Outpatient Care Facilities
1211-8331: tWWCATIORAL StRVIC[S
tlaumntery and Saeondary sehesls
Colleges. Wnivereitien. Professional Schools.
end Junior "I loges
vocational Schools. except Weestionat high
schools. WC
schools and tdeeotional Services. 11tt
Job Training and Vocational Rehabilitation Services
MIX - not eloevhere classified
sic Waste type* Description
Code
sill-��„: MlflCtL4Rte)WS
Maaeuw and Art Colle►iso
Arboreta. Deconfeel and toulegieal Cardewe
Reeeewereist Gucationel, scientific. and
Research Organi:etione
Services. WtC
1L
... �..� �i it i�i i I sill+��li IIITmi:lln�nF91Fa'i� .. SIIKr
TABLE 5
COU TOP WASTE TYPES COMI+IONLY ASSOCIATED WITH EACH SIC INDU$TFy
A Waste pesticides
d Washing and rinsing solutions containing pesticides
C Empty pesticide containers
D Spent toxsphene solutions or sludges from dipping
t Spent pesticide solutions or sludges other than toxaphene frot
dipping
f Dust containing heavy metals
G Washings and rinsing solutions containing heavy metals
H Wastewater treatment sludges containing heavy metals
I Waste ink
j Ignitable paint wastes containing flammable solvents (flash point
less than 140'F)
K Liquid paint wastes containing heavy metals (cadmium, chromium,
sercury or lead)
L Spent solvents
M Still bottoms from the distillation of solvents
N Filtration residues from dry cleaning operations
0 Cyanide wastes
P Strongly acidic or alkaline wastes
Q Spent plating wastes
R Waste ammonia
S Photographic wastes
T Ignitable wastes (flash point less than 140'F)
U Wastewater sludges containing pentachlorophenol, creosote, or
arsenic
V Waste formaldehyde
W Lead -acid batteries
X Waste explosives
Y Waste oil
2 Other
85-'72•
A
i
I
i construction of impervious floors, without drains, to hold
for cleanup, all spilis In those areas within a faciiity
where hazardous materials wi I 1 be stored, displayed, used,
or handled;
• all hazardous substances disposed of via a hazardous waste
disposal service meeting DER requirements; and
documentation of appropriate disposal of hazardous waste by
each hazardous waste generator.
4. Vegetation and Wildlife
A survey of existing vegetation on -site performed by the
Applicant shows that 88 individual trees and plants exist on
the property. According to the Appiicant, seventeen of these
will remain on -site, 16 will be relocated within the City, and
55 will probably be destroyed. Those plants being destroyed
are either undesirable species or growing in rock, making
transplanting difficult or impossible. The Applicant should
consult with, and follow the recommendations of, the Dade
County Urban Forester concerning the transplanting of trees. A
City Site Clearance and Tree Relocation/Removal Permit must be
obtained by the developer prior to clearing.
i
32
Only non-poisonous non-invasive species that are adapted to
South Florida climatic conditions, as identified in Table 6,
should be used in project landscaping, and all undesirable
exotics currently on -site should be removed. (pittosporum
Tobira is subject to pests and should be deleted from the
1 and sc ape plan).
There were no animals seen nor evidence of burrows, nestings,
or other indications of wildlife residence on the property
during a survey by the Applicant. No adverse impact on
wildlife or wildlife habitats is expected, except for the
removal and relocation of trees during site clearing.
Historical and Archaeological Sites
The project site does not contain any known historic sites or
archaeological artifacts, according to the State Master Site
file and the Dade County archaeologist. The Dade County
archaeologist will monitor the construction to record or remove
any archaeological features, artifacts, or data that might be
uncovered. The Applicant should provide access to
archaeologists monitoring the site and delay construction, if
necessary, in that portion of the site being surveyed, should
any artifacts be discovered.
Mk
.. F
a-
+YAr
Ear �
t
Y
y{
F
g
s
a
v�
: ,_
TAKE 6
RECOMM M I) PLANT SPECIES
Tress
Acacia ewiculaeformisw (Earlasf acocle)
Acacia eyenophyIla* (Beach acaela)
Acacia fornOflane (SwOOt ec8cls)
Achras :spots (Sspodllla)
Acoelorrhaphe wrightll (Pawotls palm. Cape sabot palm)
Arecastrue ramansofflon ww (Queen palm)
AvIcennia 9Orminaes (Bled* mangrove)
8suhinle spp.e (Orchid trees)
Bressele actlnophylle (Scheffloral
Bucido bucerese (Black olive)
8usere simeruba (Gusto Ilmbo)
Butte capltete (Pindo palm)
Calliandre hasmefocaphala (Powderpuff)
Calllsfamon rlglduse (Erect bottlebrush)
Csltlstwron spp ! (Bottlebrush)
Cenalle •Interano (Mild cinnamon)
Cossie fistulas (Golden shower)
Ceiba pontandra (Ceiba)
Chweedoree spP. (Household palms)
Chamearops h*willisw (European fen palm)
Chorlslo speclose (Floss sllk tree)
Chrysslldocarpus tutescensw (Arece palm. Madagascar palm)
ChrysophylIto Oilviforme ISetinleaf)
Citrus swsntlfoltee (Key ilmel
Citrus pwodlslw (Minneole Tangelo)
Citrus reticulate" (Minneolo Tangelo)
Clusle roses (Pltch appiO)
Coccolobe diverstfolle (P1900" plus)
Coccoloba grendiflore (819 loaf see grape)
Coccolobe uvlfore (Sea 9raPe)
Cwcothrtnex srgentete (Florida silver POINT
Cochlospermum vlttflo(hw (Butfercup tree)'
Coons "Vcifere 'may pen"" (my Pan coconut Palm)
Conocarpus erectus (80101wood)
Conocerpus erec+us "sOrleea" (Sliver buttonwood?
Cordte sebestan8 (Geiger tree)
Delbergle slaws (India Rosewood. Srsso)
Delonlx regime (Royal potnelana)
Drypetes Istariflore (Guiana Pluo)
Erlobctrys JaponlcIP (Loquet)
Erythina erista-9e1111e (Cockspur coral -+reel
Eugenia axillaris (white stoppers)
Eugenia confuse (Red stoppers)
Eugenia foe+ldo (Spanish stoppers)
Flcus cltrlfolto (Short leaf f191
AV
, e ,3,. q arV.';v73ieT^S�"Pp�PYTx e",.^ kY iF .IC •-•
Grevllles banksll (Banks grevlllea)
Grevlllos robuste (Silk oak)
Very large tree, not for residential use.
Gualacum sanctum (Lignum-vitae)
Hibiscus tlilecws (Sea hibiscus, Hibiscus tree, Mshoel
Ilax cesslne Mehoon holly)
Jecaranda acufllolls* (Jacaranda)
Juntporus sllllcicole (Southern red coder)
Koelreuterla forMesana* (Golden raln-tree)
Kruglodandron ferreum (Block Ironwood)
Legerstroeals Indite* (Crop Nlrtle)
Legunculwla regasoss (White mangrove)
Licarls trlandre (Gulf Ilcarla)
Llcuala grandis* (Llcuela psiM)
Lysllome belu mensis (Mild tamarind)
Lyslloma letlsllgm (Mild tamarind)
Menilksrs behamensls (Mild dilly)
Mastichodendron foetidlssloum (Mastic)
Muse hybrids* (Banana)
Myrica cerlfere (Southern wax Myrtle)
Parkinsonia eculeste* (Jerusalem thorn)
Peltophorum Ineroas (Yellow polnclana)
Plnus chase (Sand pine)
Pins elllotll (Slash pine)
Pins elllotll war. carlbee (Keys slash pine)
Pinslard arecls
Pisclda piselpules (Jamaica dogwood)
Plsonts longlfolle Molly)
Plthecoiloblun dulcsa (CeN s clew tree. Men►fla twertndT
Plumerle spp.e (Frangipani)
polnclans pulcharrtoa (Dwarf polnclana)
psaudophoenlx sergentll (Florida cherry pelm)
ptychosparwa Slogans (Seefrothis polo)
Ptychosperoa wacarthurtt (MacArthur polo)
"rcus virgtnina (Live oak)
Rhl=ophore oanglS (Red Msegrovel
Roystones slats (Royal polo)
Roystonse regle (Qiben royal polo)
Sobel palmetto (Cabbage palm)
Serene repens (Saw palmetto)
Slosroube gloats (Paradise tree)
Sophore Japonicas (Japanew pagoda tree)
Spathodss campanultss (African tulip tree)
Swistenla oahoganl ()last Indies Mahogany)
Tsbebule argm%O (Tres of gold)
Tabebule pallidas (Pink trumpet tree)
Tamerindus Indices (India Tamarind)
Tgrolnella cetsppe (Tropical slMondl
Texodlus► (Cypress)
Thespesle populneas (Portia tree, seaside oelm I
Thrinat oorrisll (Keys thatch palm)
Thrinsc radiate (Florida thatch polo)
Thrinm sapp. (Thatch palm)
Washington robusta (Washington palm)
Exotic species
4
� V i
IF
is
�A
Y
t
e�
4
�
k'
psk�
1S J r
k
t
{
a
wry
IYL
mY
$
Shrubs, Vines, and Ground Covers
Acelyphe hispidae (Chenllle plant)
Acalyphe wilkeslanse (Copperleef)
Alpinls spp. (Shell flower)
Amonlume (Torch ginger)
Antigonon leptopuse (Carol vine)
Ardisia Crenata (Christmas berry)
Aspergus spp. (Aspergus fern)
Begonle spp s (Rex begonia)
Byrosonime luclda (Locustberry)
Calllandra heematocephels (Powderpuff)
Cslliearps americans (Meriean beautybush)
Campsis redleanse (Truepet vine)
Cassla spp! (Cassia)
Cessle Behamersise (CessIO)
Chrysobalanus lesco (CbtoPloe)
Cladtum (Sawgress)
Codleem variegatume (Croton)
Conocerpus ereetus (Green buttonwood)
Conocerpus erectus sericaus (Silver butfonwood)
Conocarpus erectus serocous (Silver buttonwood)
Cosfus spp. (Spiral flag)
Dodonses viscose (Vern Ish leaf)
Dombeye welitchll (Pink bell)
Eranthemum nervosume (Blue sage)
Eugenie exIIIarIs (WI to stopper)
Eugenie Confuse (Red stopper)
Eugenia foetlda (Spanish stopper)
Eugenie uniflorse (Surinam eherryl
Forestlers segregate (Florida privet)
Gardenia Jesminoidese (Gardenia)
Gueptre discolor (Blolly)
Hamella patens (Seartetbush. flrebush)
Hadychtum Coronartuw (t ferfty II(Ill
Hedychlum flewum (yellow fifty)
Hadychtum geronertamw (Kohl II Icily)
Hedychlue spp. (Ginger filly)
Hot Ienthus diblllis (Beach sunflower)
Hibiscus rose-stnenstse (Hibiscus)
ifymaac81119 lati fol tae (Spider filly)
Ilex glabres (Gatlberry)
Ilex vaelforie none* (Dwarf yaupon holly)
Ipomoea spp. (tbrning glories, railroad vine)
Ixore Cocelneae tlxors)
ixora macrothyrse (Malay txore)
Jasmine multiflorum (Downy Jaselne)
Jetrophe multifidae (Peregrine)
Juniperus chtnonsts Columnartse (Junipers)
Juniperus confertse (Stare Juniper)
Legerstro mle Indicae tCreps-Myrtlel
I "1 .1 ..,,��r��i�„�iT�s,w� ro€�d��iart��rar+���an��a„�a�,.
Lentans deprosse (Dwarf lanfans)
Ligusfruw spp.e (Privet)
lirlopo muscertw (Lilly furf)
ilWrrays psntculefse (Orange jaselnai
Myrctenthes fregrens (Stepson stopper)
Mlrrcterle esulifioree (Jaboficaba)
Myrice certfore (Southern wax myrtle. Bayberry) '
OPhlopogon japonicuse (Ibndo gross)
Poperosle obtustfolla (Peperamla)
Pefree votubtlisw (Queen's wreath)
Phssomerle speclosae (Torch ginger)
PhllmdenAron spp.e (Self heading phllodendrun)
Pious elllottee variety dense (Dade county pine)
Plthecello guadeluponsee (Blackbead)
Piuserls spp. (Frangipani)
Podocerpus spp.e (Podocarpus)
Polysclas belfourlonae (Balfour aralis)
Ponfederis (Pickerelueed)
Psychofris nervosa (Mild coffee)
Rendla eculesta (Randle. White Indian berry)
Reynosle septenfrionails (Darling plow)
Segt#arls (Arrowhead)
Scsevols pluwlorl (Inkborry)
Scirpus (Bulrush)
Sophora loew+Mss (Necklace pod)
Stenolobluw stanse (Yellow elder)
Surlons marifles (Day ceder)
Tocawrls cepensts (Cape honeysuckle)
Taxodlum (Cypress)
Tatresygle bicolor (Tetratygls. Mast Indian Ills)
Thuwbergle arectew (Kings - Handal
Thuwbergle 91 (Clock vine)
Thyrelils glows (Thyrallis)
Trachslospermum jeswinotdesw (Oonfederete jeswtne)
Unlols peniculafs (See oafs)
Viburnum suspensusa (Sandankwa viburnuw)
Zawis florldans (Coontte)
Zonfhoxyluw fagere (Mild Iles)
Exotic species
n •�n �, �I 'I'i IV, VI tIIIII—t•VIIII 'I�'.., P'A ilipinli'"n+�Arn��oC Gw:rn�ra
6-,
V
B. ECONOMY
1. project Costs
The Applicant estimates a total project cost of S48.3 million
(1984 dollars). As shown in Table 79 an estimated eighty-eight
percent, or $42.3 million, is to be spent in the Region.
Currently, there are five buildings witn 153 apartments ano 3
offices on the Terremark site. Apartment rents range from $300
to $650 per month. Annual receipts from the apartment units
total approximately $966,000, and property taxes in 1983 were
$156,000.* An estimated 274 persons will have to relocate from
the site.
TABLE 7
CONSTRUCTION COSTS
(31,000)
Percent
Cost•
in Region
Item
Land
$1008519219
100
Labor
16,217,100
100
Haterlal
16,21791On
70
Interest
4,702,959
80
Preliminary
324,342
50
Planning
TOTAL
S4 8,312,780
Bs
0 19R4 collars
SOURCE, ADA
2. Construction Employment
The Applicant estimates tnat 674 temporary full-time equivalent
(FTE) construction jobs will be supported by the project over
38
_—A_
t
S
the one year construction period. Construction wages are _
projected at $24,082 per employee -year, or a total of $16.2
million.
3. Permanent Employment
The Applicant projects 926 permanent employees at project
completion, with 402 in services, 26 in retail, and 425 in
i
finance, insurance, and real estate. An estimated seventy-five
percent of employees would be from the Region.
Assuming 228 new employees, the Council estimates that this new
permanent project employment could generate up to 482 new jobs
in the Region, (with 78, 401, and 3 jobs In Broward, Deae, and
Monroe, respectively). This employment corresponds to $9.6
million in total wages and, by its indirect and induced
effects, could add $14.1 million in value added to the regional
economy (Table 8).
4. Fi scat Impact
Using historic average public expenditure rates and 1983
miliage rates, the project would have a positive fiscal impact
of $355,653 for Miami, $386,664 for Dade County, $247,802 for
i
the Dade County School District, and $15,573 for the South
Florida Water Management District and special districts
combined, for a cumulative annual regional total of $1,005,692
(Table 9).
39
85-'72;
TABLE 8 Al.
PERMANENT EMPLOYMENT IMPACTS
A. EMPLOYMENT
DSO. FLA.
PALM
BROWARD
DADE
M" OE
REGION
BEACH
v
AGRICULTURE. FORESTRY, FISHING
0.
0.
0.
06
0.
AGRICULTURAL SERVICES
O.
0.
0.
1.
0.
MINING
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
CONSTRUCTION
1.
2.
0.
3.
1.
MANUFACTURING
3.
8.
0.
12•
3.
TRANSPORTATION AND UTILITIES
3.
15.
0.
18.
1.
WHOLESALE TRADE
1.
6.
0.
7.
1.
RETAIL TRADE
21.
39.
1.
61.
11.
_
FINANCE, INS. AND REAL ESTATE
22.
163.
1.
186.
10.
s -
SERVICES
25.
167.
1.
194.
13.
GOVERNMENT
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
TOTAL
78.
401.
3.
482.
41.
B. TOTAL WAGES (1000 t)
•AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY. FISHING•
2.
5.
0.
7.
16.
AGRICULTURAL SERVICES
3.
6.
1.
10.
4.
MINING
0.
1.
0.
1.
1.
CONSTRUCTION
23.
32.
1.
56.
13.
MANUFACTURING
24.
172.
1.
227.
37.
TRANSPMRTATION AND UTILITIES
91.
392.
6.
480.
44.
WHOLESALE TRADE
31.
125.
2.
158.
19.
RETAIL TRADE
245.
407.
IS.
670.
124.
FINANCE, INS. AND REAL ESTATE
394.
3463.
14.
3871.
210.
SERVICES
431.
35'0.
2Q.
4030.
239.
GOVERNMENT
34.
80.
2.
116.
19.
TOTAL
1308.
8254.
73.
9636.
723.
C. VALUE OF OUTPUT (1000 S)
�AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY, FISHING•
7.
25.
0.
32.
74.
3 _
AGRICULTURAL SERVICES
10.
16.
1.
30.
11.
`w k
MINING
2.
3.
0.
5.
3.
°=
CONSTRUCTION
146.
208.
8.
362.
$2.
MANUFACTURING
308.
991.
5.
1304.
213.
TRANSPORTATION AND UTILITIES
284.
1221.
17.
1522.
137.
WHOLESALE TRADE
6%.
251.
4.
319.
38.
RETAIL TRADE
563.
935.
40.
1539.
284.
FINANCE, INS. AND REAL ESTATE
1224.
10755.
42.
12021.
651.
SERVICES
872.
7217.
59.
8148.
483.
GOVERNMENT
46.
110.
2.
158.
26.
i
TOTAL
3524.
21733.
182.
25439.
2000.
D. VALUE ADDED (1000 S)
�AGRICULTURE,
FORESTRY, FISHING*
4.�
12.•
O.
16.•
37.
=•
AGRICULTURAL SERVICES
6.
9.
2.
17.
6.
s`
MINING
1.
2.
0.
3.
2.
CONSTRUCTION
25.
36.
1.
63.
14.
1
MANUFACTURING
113.
363.
2.
478.
78.
TRANSPORTATION AND UTILITIES
194.
633.
12.
1038.
93.
WHOLESALE TRADE
41.
161.
3.
204.
24.
RETAIL TRADE
282.
469.
20.
772.
142.
FINANCE, INS. AND REAL ESTATE
585.
5143.
20.
5748.
311.
SERVICES
606.
5017.
41.
5664.
336.
GOVERNMENT
37.
90.
2.
129.
21.
TOTAL
1893.
12137.
103.
14133.
1065.
Note: Numbers may not totai due
to rounding.
SOURCE: SFRPC
40
5 •�
x-
fit
TABLE 9
FISCAL IMPACT
MYI!'F lTVF1.l1PNFNT tFNkEfv 1 EN7kE
LOCAT ION M 1 ANY 1
Clty Cw14
C V INTv II r l I BRwRY
�PECtAL E11STk ICT
lFWMWM
SCHUIL DISINICT omm
TYPE OF MVELOPMFNT MI RED
bINCLte-FUtnllt
MUI.ti-FAMILY MUEILF-�NIPF
TYPE OF 1btELllw tNiT
U
l6
U
NUMBER aF UNITS
NUMBER tv STut EMTS PER 1941T
�� lIU
bitt1lyl
S
O tinU
1 79
oo
MINER OF pfRSON+c PEA UNIT
TTITAL NUMBER OF UNITS 16
TOTAL NI•l6EIt UP STUDENTS e.
RESIDENT PU7Pt4.A71C•t 20
NUMBER UP EMPLOYEES 926
ANALYSIS COMOLICTEO USING AVEkA11E COEFFIC1EN7b
PITY I.lo TY
.PFr IN r.I,Tk IrT
44.
CII�TR1i T
F cif NPltlfiE fATEI+TRIES
IaF MERAI i1LtVER/1'FNT •
344 J2. •
16141
• 4n
ptl4_IL SAFETY •
3"A& •
17.27
• Cl
NEq_TH AND WFLFARf •
1 t lar•A •
1 kl In0
• 612
REIkF.AT 1IJM AND CILTIIkF. •
1515?5 •
7 a to
• I I
•
9.%A3 •
2736:
• 167
ThpUw.f•ORTAT IIaN
NATt NAAL RESt7 •+CES •
"57 •
16r125
• IM
•
2111'.4 •
12:+w
• a462
Pl16Llt: WURF.i
•
V103 •
a7A69
• 1241u3
n 1 u ELIANEn K
•
17►-2
ED1l ATIrIN E1F'FNhIT1.04�
EI4.tCAII(lN ANNWY. DEBT
•
tom
tiEFVIrE Awn CAPITAL ryJTLAY
WECIAL CAPITAL FArILITY
V
• U
f
A
ANNUAL FaF'FNDITIVES •
O •
CITY
COUNTY
SPECIAL Ul3TNICT
SC1111aL UI,TNICT
REVENUE CATECKIR1Eb
PkUPERTY TAXES •
4U6bC+-. •
J"267_
• 2826d
•
2542[4
OTHER TAXES •
15w•6. •
1461A
• CI.
SERVICE C►A&(4FS •
7362 •
6JJ41.
• 1179
OTHER NON -TAX LOCAL REVENUE •
66v2 •
5433
• U
*TATE INTEROOVERNENIAL •
12960 •
21121.
• U
FEDERAL INTERC-LWERN1ENTAL •
22504. •
52119.
• vv
•
97611
STATE EDUCATIONAL
•
2218
FEDERAL ELOIATIONAL
MISCELLANEOUS •
36941 •
9"Jv
• 32dt7
•
1492
ONE-TIME REVERES •
764v12 •
U.
• 0
•
O.
CITY
LOUIITY
b'Vk C'IAL DISTRICT
SCHOOL DIgTRIrT
TLITAL
TOTAL NEW ANNUAL EXPENDITURES •
157079 •
153109
• 17217
•
19792.
• 347177
TOTAL NEW ANAIAL REVENUES •
5127J2 •
53v*:;3.
• J27911
•
i675v4
• 1 Jr,:v6v
NET bUf6�Llts t UEf ti 1 T 1 •
'35W.3 6
31N604
• 355/3
•
247ia 12
iMl'1-r/1i.
C. PUBLIC FACILITIES
V .
1� Water Supply
The Applicant estimates potable water consumption to average
35 000 gallons per day (gpd), supplied by the Miami -bade Water
and Sewer Authority, with a peak demand of 89,500 gpd. This
would be a net increase of approximately 59800 gpd day
(average) above the existing demand of 30,000 gpd (average).
WASA has indicated it has sufficient capacity to serve the
project.
2. Waste Water
The project is expected to generate 35,800 gallons of
wastewater per day, with a peak flow of 89,500 gpd. The
Applicant has stated that no hazardous wastewater or toxic
v
effluent requiring special treatment will be generated by the
,G.
project. All project -generated wastewater will be treated an
disposed of through the Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Authority.
3. Solid Waste
An estimated 1.86 tons or 6.51 cubic yards per day of solid
waste materials is projected to be generated by the project at
buildout (1986). Solid waste will be collected by a private
hauling company and taken to the County Central Transfer
Station. Dade County has indicated its ability to process and
dispose of the material without adverse impact.
42
Energy
The Applicant proposes to use electricity as the sole source of
fuel for this development. Energy use is shown in Table 10.
TABLE 10
PROJECTED ON -SITE ENERGY USE AT BUILDOUT
Annual Energy Use
(BTUs x 109)
21.32
.70
.90
22.92
SOURM SFRPC
Total energy consumption at project buildout is estimated to be
22.9 billion BTUs, or 6.7 million kilowatt hours. This is
equivalent to the energy content of 3,646 barrels of crude oil.
Since this is electrical energy, three times this amount of
energy, or 10,936 barrels of oil, must be consumed at the power
plant to provide energy to the site.
The Applicant proposes to implement a number of energy
conservation measures, including energy -conscious site design
with landscape shading of open spaces and a generally east -west
orientation of the building, separate metering of office and
residential tenants, use of fluorescent lighting and minimal
use of incandescent lighting, hot water temperatures set at or
1A
below 90°F, a central energy management system, a variable
volune air distribution system• insulated glass that is tinted
or reflective and insulated wails, and encouraging use of task
lighting in office space. The App
1 scant evaluated a
cogeneration facility, but determined that it would not be cost
effective. the following additional energy measures should be
incorporated into the project buildings!
• Use of light colored wall and roof surfaces with solar
absorption coefficients less than or equal to 0.50.
• High efficiency air conditioning systems with minimum E
ER
ratings of 10.0 for the office tower, and 9.5 in residential
areas.
• Airlock doors at major project entrances.
• Measures that effectively yield, in the cooling mode, R-11
In walls and R-19 in ceilings.
• Restricted water flow in lavatories to 0.8 gallons per
minute, use of flow restricting shower heads, and water
closets with capacity of no more than three and one half
i
gallons.
44
of c
>
,'.;>,F-
0 Non -electric energy sources for space heating, cooking, and
water heating, where feasible.
• Solar water heaters in townhouse units, as feasible.
• Oom puterized elevator control system (Otis Elevonic or
equivalent).
9 Bicycle support facllities, i.e., secure bike racks and
storage areas for project employees.
5. Education
The Applicant estimates four children of school age will reside
on -site and be served by existing schools.
6. Recreation and Open Space
The site plan calls for 119810 square feet of urban plaza area
and 18,410 square feet of pedestrian open space. The project
also includes 50,400 square feet of recreation space located on
the top level of the parking garage including an exercise area,
swimming pool, jogging track, and tennis and racquetball
courts.
P•
7. Health Care and Fire
MEN
Emergency medical Service is available under County contract
with handle -Eastern Ambulance Services Average response time
is approximately fifteen minutes or less depending upon
location of the closest ambulance. The contract with bade
s
County sets a maximum response time of fifteen minutes. the
Miami Fire Department Rescue Squad will also respond in both
d d ,
non -emergency and emergency situations, with an emergency
���s,.•,
k%4
response time under four minutes.
x
Fire response would be from Station No. 8, locateo at 2917 Oak
Avenue. City fire officials have expressed concern that,
because the project is considered in "excess" of development
anticipated for the project site, it may adversely impact basic
public fire protection provided for the area. These impacts
~'•
could become significant to service provided for emergent
' -•
medical se -going safety inspections.
rvice and on
At the present time, the Miami Fire Department is developing an
impact Fee Ordinance to be imposed at building permit issuance,
calculated based upon the cost of additional facilities to
serve "excess" development. The fire department indicates tnat
this project could be subject to the fee ordinance. Tne
Applicant should enter into an agreement with the City that
' specifies Applicant responsibilities for contributing a fair
share to required fire facilities.
45
iE � `ry t 7<a rf: i. - "• '� y rt t M� � f
J
9 b } � - '� �, .Y v. s a� }[. -y 1 c � •. t � � ., 2 z-��*�1�zr...�" 4 _
r
MU
Applicant indicates that fire protection equipment and
facilities will be provided as required by Chapters 38 and 51
of the South Florida Building Code. The tower and annex garage
buildings will Include a hydraulically calculated automatic wet
type f i re spr InkI er system, f i re al arm system, emergency
communication system, pressurized stairway system, smoke
control system, and central control system, In accordance with
Chapter 51. In addition, the Applicant will provide for
vertical evacuation to the office tower roof top, for transport
by a hovering helicopter.
8. Po__ 1 I Ice
Police protection would be provided by the City from its
downtown station at 400 NW 2nd Avenue. The police Department
foresees no problem in providing routine police service to the
site. Response time to the site for emergencies would average
four and one-half minutes from time of call received at the
station to the time emergency equipment arrives at the site.
D. TRANSPORTATION
1. Existing Traffic
The traffic impact area is bounded by SW 8th Street on the
1 north, LeJeune Road on the west, and Biscayne Bay on the east
and south (Figure 6).
47
85-'72;
�f
� t a
t' h
t _ 4
t. e
;.0
�r
1
YT i`A
a
�
t
'* r
. t
PROJECT SITE
RICKE1413ACKER--1
CAUSEWAY - I
EEW:
BOUNDARY =mmmmo
FIGURE 6
TERREMARK CENTER
SOURCE: ADA I TRAFFIC IMPACT AREA
. ,,..m ,�a... a,�r,rsiasyvrF��nRi�raprRuxzttrn�ti,;+ra�. firr�xt
Existing average daily traffic (ADT) data is based on Florida
Department of Transportation (FDOT) and bade County average
daily traffic maps, supplemented by previous traffic studies in
the area and additional ADT and peak -hour turning movement
counts. Both ADT and peak -hour roadway capacities are based on
the Urban Transportation Planning System's (UTPS) capacities at
level of service (LOS) "C".
Of the twenty-one roadway segments studied in the Impact area,
ten operated below LOS "C" in 1983 on a peak -hour basis (Table
11 and Figure 7).
TABLE 11
EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS: ROAD SEGMENTS OPERATING BELOW LOS "C"«
Segment
Peak Hour LOS
Roeo M
From
To
S. Bayshore Drive
SW 17th Avenue
SW 22nd Avenue
E
S. Bayshore Drive
SW 22nd Avenue
SW 27tn Avenue
E
S. Dixie Highway
SW 17tn Avenue
SW 27tn Avenue
E
(US 1)
S. Dixie Highway
SW 27tn Avenue
SW 42nd Avenue
F
(US 1)
Grand Avenue
McFarlane Road
Mary Street
E
Bird Road
SW 37+h Avenue
SW 42nd Avenue
F
Coral Way
SW 17th Avenue
SW 37tn Avenue
D
LeJeune Roao
S. Dixie Highway
Poinciana Avenue
D
(SW 42nd Ave.)
(US 1)
LeJeune Road
Sunset Drive
Hardy Roao
F
(SW 42nd Ave.)
SW @th Street
SW 37th Avenue
SW 42nd Avenue
E
(US 41)
* Based on 1983 traffic counts.
SOURCE: ADA
4 49 85_72'
I
SOURCE: ADA
PROJECT SITE
MCFARLAPE RD.
RICKEMBA►CKER- -I
CAUSEWAY------- I
LEGEND_
ROAD SEGMENTS
THAT OPERATED
BELOW PEAK -HOUR
LOS"C" INJ 1983
�o IMPACT AREA
EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
3
2. Programmed Roadway Improvements
Numerous transportation improvements (Table 12 and Figure 8),
estimated to cost almost V56 million (1984 dollars), are
programmed within the traffic Impact area, through 1990.
3. Background Traffic
Background traffic was projected from 1983 to 1987 (project
buildout) at 1.77 percent per year, compounded, based on an
analysis of traffic growth trends over the past five years
witnin the traffic impact area.
With the addition of 1987 background traffic to the impact area
roadway network, one of the ten road segments that operated
below LOS "C" in 1983, Coral Way from SW 17th Avenue to SW 37th
Avenue, is further reduced from LOS "D" to "E". One additional
road segment, Main Highway from Poinciana Avenue to McFarlane
Road, fal is from LOS "C" to LOS "D", witn the addition of
background traffic. Thus, eleven roadway segments are
projected to operate below LOS "C" witn the addition of
background traffic (Figure 9).
4. Committed Development Traffic
i
The Council's standard traffic impact assessment metnodology
requires applicants to consider developments that have received
local government approval but whose traffic is not included in
51
TABLE 12
PROGRAMMED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
Segment
Cost
Location From
To
movement
Construction Year
(x SIO00)
S. Dixie Highway Ponce de Leon Blvd.
Douglas Road
Reconstruction
1986-1987
954
and reallgrenent
SW 8th Street SW 42nd Avenue
SW 27th Avenue
Reconstruction
1985-1986
5.207
(4 lanes)
1-95/SW 8th Street interchange
Ramp modification
19R4-1QR5
476
1-95 US 1
26th Road
2-lane ramps to
1985-19R6
1.140
and from 26th Road
SW 17th Avenue US 1
W. Flagler St.
Reconstruction
1995-1997
5.500
(4 lanes)
SW 27th Avenue US 1
S. Boyshore Dr.
Widening (4 lanes
1999-1990
1.070
Rlckenbacker Mainland
Virginia Key
New bridge. toil
1984-1987
21.524
In Causeway
facilities and
N
approaches, main-
land intersection
Improvements
Aviation Ave./Tigertall Ave.
Signalizatlon
1984-1985
50
Aviation Ave./S. Bayshore Dr.
Signalizatlon
1984-19P5
50
f35..9�1
TOTAL
S0(RCE: 1984-19119 Dade County Transportation Improvement Program
y3'
FIGURE 8
PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
S�
t
rLL �i
1e
"existing" counts. One Committed development, Grand Bay Office
Vi: •
Plaza, was identified by the Miami Planning Department (Figure
10). The proposed project, totaling 175#000 square feet of
office space, is estimated to built by 1987. A daily trip
generation rate of 12.3 trips per 1,000 square feet was used
(Source: Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation
Engineers, 1982). Both committed development and project trips
were assigned to the impact area roadway network using Miami
Urban Area Transportation Study (MOATS) data.
With the addition of Grand Bay traffic to the impact area
roadway network, two of the eleven road segments that would
`s operate below LOS "C" with the addition of background traffic,
,Y South Bayshore Drive from SW 17th Avenue to SW 22nd Avenue and
µ-:- from SW 22nd Avenue to SW 27th Avenue, are turtner
LOS "E" to "F" .
Grand Bay traffic would also reduce peak -hour levels of service
below "C" on one additional road segment, SW 27tn Avenue from
South Bayshore Drive to Bird Road, from LOS "C" to "D". Thus,
twelve roadway segments are projected to operate below LOS "C"
during the PM peak -hour prior to project development (Figure
55
es-7z-
FIGURE 10
COMMITTED DEVELOPMENT LOCATION MAP
SOURCE: ADA
s
6
d '
rr �t�F aY`i i! ;.
WR
xI
2-
�r4. tM
� a �
01..
Y Y�
iak�3 V 5.
4
� r r
r
Yn
o
V�
tf ( T
i
f
a. S
-
E . . •
ui a
Q
F
0
CA SUNSET F
N ftl DR.
ti
N
•
COCONUT GROVE
STATION
GRAND AVE.
F33,AA•
V/ o
IANA I AVE.
S
E.
0
E
cm
ST, u NA
Ic
W n
>
k
PJS
3�d �
PROJECT SITE
MCFARLAPE RD.
FIGURE 11
RICKENB'ACKER.
--CAUSEWAY,-,,
LEEGEN11.
ROA ESEGMENTS
�u�►1►7 PROJECTED TO
OPERATE BELOW
PEAK-1-IOUR LOS "C"
IMPACT AREA
SOURCE: ADA FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
(WITHOUT PROJECT)
L
5. Project Traffic
a. Trip Generation
Project traffic was projected using standard institute of
Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip generation rates for
residential (5.2 daily trips per dwelling unit) and office
(10.9 daily trips per 1,000 gross square feet of floor
area). Since a small percentage of retail space is
assumed in ITE's office generation rates, project retail
space *was included in the office land use category.
Twelve percent peak -hour transit ridership was assumed.
If fully occupied, the project would generate 3,422 daily,
614 AM peak -hour, and 590 PM peak -hour vehicle trips.
Vehicle access to the site would occur at one entrance on
Aviation Avenue. Drive-thru banking would be provided
from a single -lane entrance on Tigertail Avenue that would
exit on Aviation Avenue.
At the request of Council staff, the Applicant evaluated
moving the bank entrance from Tigertail to Aviation Avenue
in order to avoio westbound left -turns on Tigertail
Avenue. it was determined that the site design would not
allow for sufficient internal vehicle stacking if the
entrance was on Aviation Avenue. However, an exclusive
left -turn lane for vehicles westbound on Tigertail Avenue
58
TWW
5
`.`� n
e Y�, ✓ cif
. .r:. v � . ':✓ l rt..Y"!+5_i
A
to the drive-in bank should be provided by the Applicant
to alleviate potential delay on Tigertall.
b. parkin
The Applicant proposes to provide a six -level parking
3 garage with 1,052 parking spaces, exceeding City
requirements by 441 spaces. Two percent of parking spaces
would be reserved for the handicapped and five percent for
carpools/vanpools. Five truck bays would also be provided
in accordance with City requirements.
c. Mass Transit
Three local bus routes currently serve the project
4"r
vicinity. Also, the Coconut Grove MetroralI station is
located two-thirds mile from the project. Regular shuttle
'f
service, provided by the Applicant, should connect the
tryi",
Q
project with the Coconut Grove station.
d. Future Traffic
W.
With the addition of project traffic to the roadway
network, one additional road segment, Bird Avenue between
US 1 and SW 27th Avenue, would fall from LOS "C" to L
Thus, thirteen roadway segments are projected to
operate below LOS "C" at project bui Idout (Figure 12).
59
85-'721
a —
XIMF
...51
tx .
.
i
t r-� Ems# syz
� >�. J�' � -F t ,we t C '�
,,y � � i r. +s ,uw:' S t �t � ✓_�}h�;
i
��fi �'�5.1ti, �: �� .,. �xY �. .. •� �
=i'
�� a� �� i-. Y - a � j !� Y r, `�*Li.., "� J''w,�V, r:`{eTi6��., —
................
S.W. 0
E to
w
C4
•
CO COCONUT GROVE w
I STATION A
11
SUNSETIN F
DR. O-S-04
SOURCE:ADA
m
J
flu
ST.
>
run)
lu
3c
S.-
PROJECT SITE
MWARLANE RD.
FIGURE 12
Alr.Kl:MRAt-WlCrl-I
CAUSEWAY ------
LEGEND:
0 ROAD SEGMENTS
PROJECTED TO
OPERATE BELOW
PEAK-4 OUR LOS "Co
=Emc= IMPACT AREA
FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
(WITH PROJECT)
With construction of all intersection improvements
discussed in Section 6 below, none of the five critical
Intersections analyzed by the Applicant fall below LOS "C"
(Table 13).
TABLE 13
PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACTS: CRITICAL INTERSECTIONS
Am Peek -Hour
% Project Traffic
PM Peek -Four
i Project Traffic
Mbvemen4
N
Movement
S E 1! L�5
Intersection
N S E
W Ln
SW 27 Ave./Tigerteii Ave.
0 17 2
2 B
6
1 0 20 C
SW 27 Ave./Soutn BeYshore Dr.
0 0 5
0 C
0
0 0 5 B
Aviation Ave./Tigertetl Ave.
4 51 20
19 C
79
2 2 0 C
Aviation Ave./Soutn Bayshore Dr.
0 4 5
13 C
0
81 0 0 A
1 8 19
0 A
19
1 0 0 C
SW 27 Ave./Bird Rueo
6. Recommended Improvements and Funding
By 1987, the year used for the Applicant's traffic analysis as
project " buildout," unacceptable levels of service are
projected on nine regionally significant arterials (thirteen
roaaway segments) in the impact area during the peak -hour:
e South Bayshore Drive, SW 17th Avenue to SW 27th Avenue, LOS
Of F"
M
61
135-72;
• SW 27th Avenue, South Bayshore Drive to US 19, LOS "D"
0 US 10 SW 17th Avenue to SW 42nd Avenue, LOS " E"/"F"
• Main Highway, Poinciana Drive to McFarlane Road, LOS "D"
• Grand Avenue, McFarlane Road to Mary Street, LOS "E"
• Bird Avenue, SW 27th Avenue to US 19 LOS "D", Bird Road, SW
37th Avenue to SW 47th Avenue, LOS "F"
• Coral Way, SW 17th Avenue to SW 37th Avenue, LOS "E"
' • LeJeune Road, Sunset Drive to Hardy Road, LOS "F", LeJeune
Road, US 1 to Poinciana Drive, LOS "D".
• SW Stn Street, SW 37th Avenue to SW 42nd Avenue, LOS "E"
Each of the nine roadways specified above, with the exception
of SW 27th Avenue ( see below) , cannot be widened due to
right-of-way constraints. South Bayshore Drive, wnicn is
estimated to carry approximately 18 percent of project traffic
north of the project site and 15 percent of project traffic
south of the project site, would operate at LOS "F" both with
and without the addition of Terremark traffic between SW 17th
Avenue and SW 27th Avenue by project buildout (1981). The City
has designated this road a "scenic transportation corridor" by
Resolution 76-1045, which entitles it to protection as an
Environmental Preservation District according to Chapter 64 of
the Miami City Code. Any road within an Environmental
Preservation District cannot be widened. Furthermore in 1977,
House Bill 1116 extended State protection (Chapter 77-491,
62
MA
F.S.) to South Bayshore Drive by designating it as a "State
Historic Highway."
The Council's fair share methodology has been applied to data
presented in the Application. As previously discussed, almost
$36 million (unless otherwise stated, all costs are in 1984
dollars) in roadway and intersection improvements are
programmed in the County Transportation improvement Program for
the Terremark traffic impact area. Terrem ark would
significantly benefit from the programmed 4-lane widening of SW
27th Avenue and signalization of both Aviation Avenue/Tigertail
Avenue and Aviation Avenue/S. Bayshore Drive, all road
improvements that will provide additional capacity for
motorists accessing the project. Since reserve capacity on
programmed improvements would be taken up by the project, the
Applicant's fair share of programmed improvements is $128,747
(Table 14), in proportion to its share of total traffic
projected for 1987 on these segments.
Applicant recommended improvements include the widening
of Aviation Avenue from South Bayshore Drive to Tigertai I
Avenue to 3 lanes, with a middle lane for left turns (Figure
13), $100,000; additional northbound and southbound through
lanes, a northbound left turn lane, and a westbound right turn
lane at SW 27th Avenue/Tigertail Avenue (Figure 109 R709000;
63
85- `
M
i
TABLE 14
APPLICANT FAIR SHARE OF PROGRAMMED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
Applicant's
Location
Improvement
Cost*
Fair Snare**
US 1 from Ponce de Leon
Reconstruction and
S 954,000
S 12,337
Blvd. to Douglas Road
realignment
SW 8tn Street from SW 42nd
Reconstruction
5,207,000
$04p7
Avenue to SW 27th Avenue
(4 lanes)
I-95/SW 8tn Street
Interchange ramp
476,000
0
modification
1-95 from US 1 to N. of
2-lane and
ps aRoad
1,140,000
0
SW 26th Read
SW 26tn
SW 17th Avenue from US 1
Reconstruction
5/5000000
0
to W. Fiagler Street
(4 lanes)
SW 27tn Avenue from S. Bay-
Widening (4 lanes)
9
1,070,000
90,493
shore Drive to US 1
Rickenbacker Causeway
New Bridge, toll
g d
21,524,000
0
facilities an
approaches, main-
land intersection
improvements
Aviation Avenue/Tigertaii Signal ization
50,000 13,690
Avenue
naiization 50,000 3,820
Si
Aviation Avenue/S. Bay- 9
shore Drive
535,971,000 $128,747
* 1984 dollars
** "0" indicates no Terremark traffic assigned to the facility.
SOURCE: SFRPC
64
0
F I GORE 13
AVIATION AM AND INTERSECTION WROVEMENTS
� y
d
1=51 G
PROPOSED
SOURCE: ADA
,gyp
/A +
85-'72;
4
w
f I GURr 14
RECOMMENDED IMRROVEMENTS:
SW 27TH AVENUE/TIGERTAIL AVENUE
s
Q
a
EXISTING
I I�
'i
a
111 r
1
PROPOSED
SOURCE: ADA
p E_
1�
y
eastbound and westbound left turn lanes on Tigertail Avenue at
Aviation Avenue (Figure 13) and a westbound left turn lane on
Tigertail into the Terrem ark drive-in bank, $459000; and a
northbound left turn lane on South Bayshore Drive at Aviation
Avenue (Figure 13), $15,000.
Table 15 shows the Applicant fair share of these recommended
roadway improvements at $158,674, or approximately 67 percent,
since the fair share is the ratio between 1987 Terremark
traffic that would use the improved roadway or intersection and
the total increase in traffic between now and 198" on that
facility, based on the Applicant's traffic analysis.
Based on the above, the Applicant fair share for both
programmed and Applicant -recommended transportation
improvements is $287,421. However, the term "fair share" as
used in this Terrem ark DRI Assessment is somewhat misleading
since the programmed and Applicant -recommended improvements
identified in Tables 14 and 15 do not mitigate project impact
on many segments of the regional roadway network, which, as
noted above, cannot be widened due to right-of-way constraints
or scenic designations. If the Applicant's transportation
impact could be fully mitigated by widening roads whose levels
of service are projected to operate below LOS 1101, the
fair -share would be significantly higher.
67
85-'72,
TABLE 15
APPLICANT FAIR SHARE OF RECOMMENDED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
Applicant's
Year
Location
Improvement
Cost*
Fair Share
1997
Aviation Avenue from
3 lanes, middle
$100,000
S 94,940
S. Bayshore Drive to
lane for left turns
Tigertail Avenue
1987
SW 27tn Avenue/Tiger-
NB, SB thru lanes
70,000
11,091
tail Avenue
NB left -turn lane
WB right -turn lane
1987
Aviation Avenue/
EB left -turn lane
45,000
39,265
Tigertail Avenue
on Tigertail
WB left -turn lane
on Tigertail
to Aviation Avenue
WB left -turn lane on
Tigertail to
Terremark drive-in
bank entrance
1987
Aviation Avenue/S.
NB left -turn lane
15,000
13,378
Bayshore Drive
on Bayshore
TOTAL $230,000 $158,674
NB - northbound
SB - southbound
EB - eastbound
WB - westbound
* 1984 oollars
SOURCE: SFRPC
Thus, the Councii recommends that the Applicant construct all
improvements identified in Table 15 (1230,000) and deposit
$60,000 (1984 dollars) In an escrow account for County widening
of SW 27th Avenue from 2 to 4 lanes, divided, from Bayshore Drive
to US 1, a programmed improvement scheduled for construction beginning
in 1989. As additional mitigation, it is recommended that the
Applicant provide weekday shuttle service to and from the Coconut
Grove Metrorall Station at no cost to riders at 10-minute intervals
from 7:00 to 10:00 a.m. and from 3:30 to 6:30 p.m., and at 30-minute
Intervals between 10:00 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. ($55,000 annually).
7. Cumulative Impact Analysis - Existing Zoning vs. SPI-17
Tne previously discussed Bayshore Drive Development Study
( prepared by the Miami Planning Department) identified ten land
parcels in the Bayshore Drive area of Coconut Grove as having a
"high probability" of development, or likely to be
developed/redeveloped between 1985 and 1990 (Figure 15). in an
effort to identify "worst case" impacts of the SPI-17 overlay
district, Council staff requested the Applicant to calculate
the traffic generated if all ten parcels were developeo by
project buildout (1987) at both the existing 1.21 FAR and the
proposed 1.71 FAR (the existing FAR with a 0.50 FAR bonus for
providing publicly accessible parking), although City Planning
Department staff have indicated that it is highly unlikely that
more than two or three of the ten "high probability" parcels
85-72;
;:
,s
r�
r
PPPPPP
b K,'
L Y
l
4 I.
f
ri
it
t
r4�y i'
A t
�15i K+X
� }
�•� yj
Y
a k
FIGURE 15
DEVELOPMENT SUSCEPTIBILITY
�e
uyUL
UE
)r,
�� �CD Cjt'il.
pia oa
a
C
0 100 200 300 400
SCALE IN FEET
SOURCE: CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT
would ever receive the 0.50 FAR bonus. Under both analyses,
the following developments were included in addition to the ten
"high probablIIty" parcels and terrem ark:
• Mayfair - Retail 460,000 square feet
• Monty 'Trainer's - Specialty Center, 1000000 square feet
• Dinner Key - Exhibition Hall, 15,000 square feet
Theatre, 500 seats
Marina, 200 slips
• Grovegate - Office, 297,000 square feet
Retail, 310400 square feet
For the 1.21 FAR development scenario, 7errem ark traffic was
estimated using a 1.21 FAR rather than the proposed development
level of 1.71 FAR.
Under the 1.21 FAR development scenario, peak -hour levels of
service on segments operating below " C" would be reduced on
four of the twenty-one roadway segments in the impact area:
• SW 27th Avenue - S. Bayshore Drive to Bird Avenue, LOS "D"
to "F" ,
• Main Highway - Poinciana Avenue to McFarlane Road, LOS "D"
to It Ell ,
• Grand Avenue - McFarlane Road to Mary Street, LOS "E" to
"F" , and
• Bird Avenue - US 1 to SW 27tn Avenue, LDS "C" to 'IF".
71
65--72:
a
MW
Building ail ten "high development" parcels at a 1.71 FAR would
not reduce levels of service on any additional 5egm
ants. 40
road segment would receive more than 75 edoitional peak -hour
trips as a result of the 0.50 FAR bonus being applied to all
ten parcels, plus the terremark site.
72
PART III SUMMARY AND REC"ENDATIONS
Summary
The Development of Regional Impact assessment for Terremark Centre
indicates that the project would have the following positive regional
Impacts.
• Up to 228 permanent new jobs would be generated by the project.
Nearly 255 additional full-time jobs could be generated in the three
South Florida counties, with a $9.6 million increase in total wages
and $14.1 million in value added to the regional economy.
• A net positive fiscal impact of $1 million would be created by the
project.
• The project would el iminate regular discharge of poi Iuted stormwater
runoff from the site and Aviation Avenue to Biscayne Bay, a State
aquatic preserve.
�
�6
Council eval
adverse reg
uation indicates tnat the proposed project should not create
Tonal impact on soils, animal life, or vegetation. However,
In terms of
adverse regional impact, the project would:
•
Increase existing potable water demand by an average of 6,000 gallons
per day (36,000 gallons per day total).
73
a
• increase annual energy use within the Region by the equivalent of
11,000 barrels of residual fuel oil.
• Potentially increase the amount and number of hazardous materials used
on -site and the hazardous wastes (a waste that is ignitable,
i
corrosive, reactive, or toxic) generated, thereby posing a possible
threat to groundwater and Biscayne Bay.
• increase the quantity of runoff pollutants entering the Biscayne
Aquifer.
Generate an average of 1.9 short tons, or 6.5 cubic yards, of solid
waste per day.
• Generate an average of 6,000 gallons of wastewater per day above that
presently generated by existing site development.
• Place additional unfunded demands upon poi ice, emergency rescue, and
fire services, although the public agencies responsible for providing
these services have indicated that they will serve the project.
Generate nearly 3,420 daily and 600 peak -hour vehicle trips on the
regional roadway network.
74
Recommendations
Based on consideration of the above specified positive and negative
regional Impacts and provided that the Miami City Commission adopts the
zoning recommendations of the Planning Department's Bayshore Drive
Development Study, including amending Zoning Ordinance 9500 by adding the
SPI-171, South Bayshore Drive Overlay District, it is the recommendation
of the Council that the Application for Development Approval for
Terremark Centre be APPROVED subject to incorporation of the following
conditions into the Development Order to increase the probability of
realizing positive regional impacts and to mitigate, reduce, or eliminate
adverse regional impacts:
THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS WILL:
1. incorporate the following into the project design and operation to
minimize the cumulative impact of Terremark traffic, and its
associated pollutant emissions, on air quality:
• designate five percent of employee parking spaces, located as
close as possible to elevator and building entrances, for
exclusive car or vanpool use.
• actively encourage and promote car and van pooling by
establishing a car pool information program, and offering
preferred parking spaces and work shifts to car and van poolers.
75
ss-7z
• actively encourage and promote transit ridership by providing
regular shuttle service, pursuant to Oondition 16 below, between
the project and the Coconut Grove Metrorail Station, and by
providing Wtrorail, Metrobus, and shuttle service route and
schedule information in convenient locations throughout the
project.
• Promote staggered flex -time work schedules, four day work weeks,
or other management actions and marketing strategies, that
reduce peak demand for roadway capacity and tnereby reduce
transportation energy use.
2. Design, construct, and maintain the storm water management system to
meet the following standards:
• Retain all washdown water from the parking garage in a vegetated
retention area with a raised catch basin(s) that direct(s) any
overflow to sedimentation boxes and, subsequently, drainage
wells.
• Washdown parking areas only when there is adequate storage
capacity in the swale(s).
• Construct all catch basins to retain oil and grease, and
regularly maintain the catch basins.
a Vacuum sweep the garage area before every washdown.
76
�i-et�u�r� � ..� .. _.fr_ � .,r-. t..Y« a�$t .4 F -.
Ji zi.✓....r ,., _. .v .._ .r • ,.tt —'. d' ,e.. .. ��:i
tr I
II
is'
Submit a revised drainage plan showing Swale location, dimensions,
general runoff routing network, and calculations which demonstrate
adequate Swale capacity to the Council for review and approval
before requesting any building permits for the project and as part
of the consolidated Application for Development Approval required
by Condition 17 below.
4. As part of the transportation improvements required by Condition 14
below, reconstruct the street drainage system for Aviation Avenue,
from South Bayshore Drive to Tigertail Avenue to manage runoff from
a 5-year storm by retaining the first 1.5 Inches of runoff in
french drains, with overflow from the design storm discharging to
Biscayne Bay. If underground utilities prohibit use of french
drains, the Applicant will construct a drainage well system capable
of managing the 5-year storm.
5. Incorporate into the development, by restrictive covenant and/or
lease or sales agreements, as applicable, hazardous materials
accident prevention, mitigation, and response standards, to be met
by the Applicant and all tenants classified by a SIC code listed
Table 4 of the Council DRI Assessment that use, handle, store,
display, or generate hazardous materials (ignitable, corrosive,
toxic, or reactive), including those identified in Table 5 of the
77
85-'72;
M
Council DRI Assessment; provided, however, that the uses in Table 4
and the wastes in Table 5 shall be simultaneously amended upon the
addition or deletion of any or all of the listed uses, materials,
or wastes by amendment to the "County and Regional Hazardous Waste
Assessment Guidelines" incorporated by reference into Rule
17-31.03(2)9 Florida Administrative Code. At a minimum, these
standards shall:
e require that areas within buildings where hazardous materials or
hazardous wastes are to be used, displayed, handled, generated,
or stored shall be constructed with impervious floors, without
drains, to ensure containment and facilitate cleanup of any
spill or leakage.
e require that the loading/unloading of any hazardous material or
hazardous waste shall occur in a covered loading/unloading dock
with a spill containment area not connected to the project
drainage or sewer system.
e prohibit any outside storage of hazardous materials or hazardous
waste.
e require all hazardous waste generators to contract with a
licensed public or private hazardous waste disposal service or
processing facility and to provide to Dade County DERM copies of
78
P
3 iUj
r..
i
t
ti
f:
a•E
r
t
t:�
,,
.
J
Y
M
is
one of the following forms of documentation of proper hazardous
waste management practices:
- a hazardous waste manifest;
- a shipment to a permitted hazardous waste management
facility; or
- a confirmation of receipt of materials from a recycler or a
waste exchange operation.
notify any tenant generating wastes of the penalties for
improper disposal of hazardous waste pursuant to Section
403.727, Florida Statutes.
• Allow reasonable access to facilities for monitoring by the
city,
bade County DERM, and
Florida
DER to assure compliance
with
this development order
and all
applicable laws and
regulations.
6. Remove all invasive exotic plants from the project site as the site
is cleared, and amend the landscape plan to ensure use of only
those plant species included in Table 6 of the Council DRI
Assessment in future project landscaping.
7. Prior to any site clearing, consult with, and follow the
recommendations of, the Dade County Urban Forester concerning
transplanting trees presently on the site.
79
X i
j.
y jam.
1� A
I
Z.!
r?
xi
.3ikw v
SS-72-
g, Delay construction up to three months in any area where potentially
significant historic or archaeological artifacts are uncovered, and
permit State and local historic preservation officials to survey
and excavate the site.
g. Obtain the necessary approvals from Dade WASA for water and
wastewater service.
�O. Construct the building to allow emergency helicopter evacuation
from the roof.
11. Collaborate with the Police Department to incorporate security
measures and systems into the design and operation of the project.
12. Enter into an agreement with the City to contribute a fair share of
capital facilities required to provide adequate fire service to the
project, or, in the alternative, pay a fair share contribution
pursuant to an adopted City impact fee ordinance pertaining to fire
service if such impact fee ordinance is adopted by the City prior
to obtaining final certificates of occupancy for more than 200,000
square feet of development on -site.
13. incorporate the following energy conservation measures into the
development:
so
a
0X
s ,aa vi'.Ja
�Av.c�
—
7xs.r.� 4"�«
3VYislNd:titx"�+ ..—
L
• Landscape shading of open spaces
• Separate electric metering of office and residential tenants.
• Use of natural light and fluorescent task lighting.
• Hot water temperatures set at or below 90°F, except where
otherwise specified by health codes.
• Central energy management system in the office tower that will
provide start/stop optimization, time of day scheduling,
electric demand limiting, night temperature setback/setup,
programmed maintenance, and building lighting control.
• Air distribution using a variable air volune system.
• Insulated glass that is tinted or solar reflective.
• Airlock doors at major project entrances.
• Light -reflecting and/or light colored wall and roof surfaces,
with solar absorbtion coefficients less than or equal to 0.50.
• Bicycle racks and storage areas for project employees.
85-'72;
Lavatory water flow of 0.8 gallons per minute or less, water
closets that use no more than three and one half gallons per
flush, and flow restricting shower heads.
• Reduction of cooled space by thermally isolating non -critical
areas, such as closets and other storage areas.
• High efficiency air conditioning systems with minimum EER
ratings of 10.0 in the office tower and 9.5 in residential
areas.
• Measures that effectively yield, in the cooling mode, R-11 in
walls and R-19 in ceilings.
• Non -electric energy sources for space heating, cooking, and
water heating, if feasible.
• Solar water heaters in townhouse units, as feasible.
• Computerized elevator control system (Otis Elevonic or
equivalent).
14. Construct all roadway and intersection improvements identified in
Table 15 of the Council DRI Assessment and dedicate the
improvements to the City, prior to issuance of final certificates
82
Y
f 1 � � 7• YS � .L ''k ��� 'Fit � fr��",
1
of occupancy for more than 2009000 gross square feet of development
on -site.
15. Deposit $60,000 in an interest -bearing escrow account as partial
construction funding for the bounty -programmed 4-laning of NW 27tn
Avenue from US 1 to South Bayshore Drive, prior to issuance of
certificates of occupancy for more than 200,000 square feet of final
gross floor area on -site. Such funds will be released to the
County at any time upon request. The Applicant wi I i annually
notify the County Development Impact Committee and Public Works
Department of the availability of tnese funds until such time as
the County expends these funds. A copy of this notification will
be included in the annual report required by Condition 18 herein.
16. After final certificates of occupancy are issued for more than
200,000 gross square feet of building space, provide shuttle
service each weekday using a minimum of two vans or buses to and
from the Coconut Grove Metrorall station at 10-minute or less
intervals from 7:00 to 10:00 a.m. and from 3:30 to 6:30 p.m., and
at 30-minute or less intervals from 10:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.
(off-peak) .
Consolidate all original and supplemental ADA information into a
revised Application
for Development
Approval
(ADA),
and submit
three copies of the
document to the
Council
and one
copy to the
C
15.
16.
17.
of occupancy for more than 2000000 gross square feet of development
on -site.
Deposit $609000 in an interest -bearing escrow account as partial
construction funding for the bounty -programmed 4-laning of NW 27th
Avenue from US 1 to South Bayshore Drive, prior to issuance of
certificates of occupancy for more than 200,000 square feet of final
gross floor area on -site. Such funds wi I 1 be released to the
County at any time upon request. The Applicant will annually
notify the bounty Development Impact Committee and Public Works
Department of the availability of these funds until such time as
the County expends these funds. A copy of this notification will
be included in the annual report required by Condition 18 herein.
After final certificates of occupancy are issued for more than
200,000 gross square feet of building space, provide shuttle
service each weekday using a minimum of two vans or buses to and
from the Coconut Grove
Metrorail
station at 10-minute or
less
intervals from 7:00 to
10:00 a.m.
and from 3:30 to 6:30
p.m., and
at 30-minute or less intervals from 10:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.
(off-peak).
Consolidate all original and supplemental ADA information into a
revised Application
for Development
Approval
(ADA),
and submit
three copies of the
document to the
Council
and one
copy to the
83
r
r
S=S=ss++
85-'72;
,,-IN
• Description of any incidents or spills of hazardous materials,
including but not limited to those in Table 5, as it May be
amended; and specification of the actions taken to clean up and
dispose of the spilled material.
THE CITY WILL:
19, Withhold issuance of final certificates of occupancy for more than
200,000 gross square feet of development on -site until the
Applicant has complied with Conditions 14, 15, and 16 herein.
20. Incorporate the Application for Development Approval, as revised
pursuant to Condition 179 by reference into the Development Order
for Terremark Centre as follows:
"The Application for Development Approval is incorporated
herein by reference and relied upon by the parties in
discharging their statutory duties under Chapter 380, Florida
Statutes, and local ordinances. Substantial compliance with
the representations contained in the Application for
Development Approval is a condition for approval unless
waived or modified by agreement among the Council, City, and
Applicant, its successors, and/or assigns."
21. Incorporate the Council DRI Assessment by reference into the
Development Order.
M,
85
65-'72;
City and the Florida Department of Community Affairs within ninety
(90) days of the effective date of this Development Order.
1s. Prepare and submit to the Council, City, and Florida Department of
Community Affairs, an annual monitoring report containing an
assessment of compliance with all conditions of the Terremark
Development Order and any other information required by Section
380.06(14)(c)(3)9 F.S. Further, throughout project operation, and
unless and until Rule 17-31, Florida Administrative Code, is
repealed or otherwise declared null and void, the annual monitoring
report shall include the following information:
• identification of all tenants that meet the criteria established
In Tables 4 and 5 of the Council ORI Assessment, as may be
amended pursuant to Condition 5 herein.
• For each such tenant, copies of one of the following types of
documentation of approproate hazardous waste disposal:
- a hazardous waste manifest,
- a bill of lading from a transporter indicating shipment to a
permitted hazardous waste management facility, or
- a confirmation of receipt of material from a recycler of a
waste exchange operation.
84
7-7
�Oil
i t i f'rl
—
'+�r
ti; �+�. ,y``� *� a K�� sky ��,+��� � s a '�' �— � s •; � .� � s ns ' x !l `� { }` 4 -- T �� ��'.��YS� •:t—
C
• Description of any incidents or spills of hazardous Materials,
Including but not limited to those in Table 51 as it may be
amended; and specification of the actions taken to clean up and
dispose of the spilled material.
THE CITY WILL:
19. Withhold issuance of final certificates of occupancy for more than
200,000 gross square feet of development on -site until the
Applicant has complied with Conditions 14, 15, and 16 herein.
20. Incorporate the Application for Development Approval, as revised
pursuant to Condition 17, by reference into the Development Order
for Terremark Centre as follows:
"The Application for Development Approval is incorporated
herein by reference and relied upon by the parties in
discharging their statutory duties under Chapter 380, Florida
Statutes, and local ordinances. Substantial compliance with
the representations contained in the Application for
Development Approval is a condition for approval unless
waived or modified by agreement among the Council, City, and
Applicant, its successors, and/or assigns."
21. incorporate the Council DRI Assessment by reference into the
Development Order.
85
85-'72;
22. provide that the effectiveness of the Development Order shall be
stayed and no development permits thereunder shall be granted,
until such time as an Amended ADA, providing updated information,
is submitted to the Council, City, and State and an Amended
Development Order issued, if Conditions 1 through 17 have not been
complied with within four years from the effective date of the
Development Order. Should the Development Order be stayed pursuant
to this condition, nothing herein shall be construed to limit
Condition 25 below that this Development Order runs with the land,
and its terms and conditions are binding on the Applicant, its
successors, and/or assigns.
23. Designate an official to monitor compliance with all conditions of
the Development Order and specify monitoring procedures in the
Development Order to insure such compliance.
24. Specify requirements for an annual report in accordance with
Section 380.06(14)(c)(3), F.S.
25. Require recordation of the terrem ark Centre Development Order with
the Clerk, Dade County Circuit Court, pursuant to Section
380.06(14)(d), F.S., specifying that the Development Order runs
with the land and is binding on the Applicant, its successors,,
and/or assigns.
86
M
LAW OFFICES
SURAN K. C011FN
January 23, 1985
ia60 9RICKELL AVENUE
SUITE 300
MIAMI• FLORIDA 93131
TELEPHONE (305) 374-6777
t,. Honorable Mayor Maurice Ferre
;_. Vice -Mayor Joe Carollo
Commissioner J.L. Plummer
Commissioner Demetrio Perez
Commissioner Miller Dawkins
Re: SPI-17 and related rezoning items
Dear Sir:
This office represents -the Tigertail Association, Inc., the
Coconut Grove Civic Club, Inc.; Mr. Barry Fellman and Mr. & Mrs.
Ron Cold on the above rezoning amendments.
My clients have some suggestions for your consideration
which may help resolve the opposing positions on these matters;
and will be grateful to you if you consider these suggestions.
It is hoped that these suggestions will allow development of the
Bayshore area while preserving the integrity of the North Grove:
1). SPI-3 currently runs parallel to Tigertail
approximately 2201 deep, and RG 2/5 currently
includes land to 1001 deep along Tigertail.
My clients propose to establish a line 1501 deep
parallel to Tigertail which will remain RG 2/5
and SPI-3.
This proposal would result in less gross square
footage being available to Terremark, and
consequently a reduction in the size of Terremark.
However, Terremark would still be approximately
50% larger in floor space then existing zoning
allows, and the neighborhood would retain
protections.
2). Put a cap on the number of parking spaces needed.
_ The Dinner Rey Master Plan indicates a need for
650 spaces after the parking areas are restriped.
once there is a cap on the spaces needed, the
bonus can be apportioned among the property
owners in the SPI-17 area so that the bonus
es-7z-
Page 2
January 23p 1985
is distributed equally. A developer using more
than his allowed number of bonus spaces could
buy these rights from the other property owners.
3). Maintain the 22 story height limit.
4). The parking garage size problem could be worked
with. If the size of Terremark is reduced some,
the garage will be reduced. The figures for
the bonus could be worked with to allow Terremark
' to receive, for example, the .5 FAR for 100 extra
parking spaces. However, .5 FAR would be a
maximum for SPI-17. In this way, development
could occur, without the problem of the parking
garage size.
5). A recycling of SPI-17 for the proper notice and
procedure.
6). My clients would also like public hearings on
class C special permits, and Design Review input.
My clients have met with the developer, and I have met with
Mrs.`Dougherty'in'an attempt to resolve the concerns of all par-
ties:` i�ty clie'tits;-as you know, must continue to object to any
Procedural violations and argue on the merits until there are no
longer any violations.
I' hope I will' 'hate the' opportunity to speak with you per-
sonally about these suggestions to answer any questions you may
have II, Again I thank you for the time you're taking to review
these` suggestions: '
Very truly yours,
Z'r!
SUSAN R�. COHEN
SRC:da
85-'72-
WRI I Wa I I ace Robert s &TOdd
Architects - Landscape Architects - Lithan and Environmental Planners - 150 SF 2nd Avenue - SOP 1111 . Miami FL 33131 - 105!371 .3822
o
1985
January 24p 1985
Mr. Sert,i L.
Di T)e C t or
AICP r.
275 1N1.ftiM&QA*i' KuVjj'11&,cleraj Inc.
L
Suite 1400
100 N. Biscayne Building
j,"j&&iq4 ftevidla, *Z&32&t I'd
Mrs. blytip
Terrt---tArk Centre'
-beak Mr. BerM61103
Pear >lr. Rodktia ' uclv-, - ; --
I have reviewed the SPI-17 south Bayshore overlay District It
t .ftAhe a,43,Tr D11 Miamit Compr ,ehi&ngjv cl ,e,,.Nei hborhood Plan
W at he oosed district does not conflict with
AAAYy wtniion.:thtr
the intent of the Comprpehepnsive Plan.
kA*,j,.,find that the incentives that the district offers
SPA.k.q4f tP*;
for.the provision of excess parking to serve Dinner Key is
yo, Plan! a., policy to
e.41; i nq goXtiae X-wr"tional+Liretail and
3M44 Y
pine
t1-c
P1q01.
�144T1Ab9y&Pi eg q jCj\%t Oeye.thep se Ee
-xpanrdke
parkin
j 40MiltAM'41XqdAqaP411OUrf4ea tit: -parking
g
pForijR4qXf-T6A neXOY,[poptertiep along south
e,that
9!iO(j tile, Fross:Aot area has b-On tj le- I i r r L i ari� Awinti(,Li Avunuc- pub-1
0, 0, -,
C) ai, per S,,rtor C141
`I -way; Par ; , 5 .
Lu
'CC propert% L) L
L-UL)l
rig'; L-0i
'FT U L i iZc C:
C,!ic
e
31 1
'iLY
it: h e propoqed_ SPI-17 h'O', C
_
322,145.2p Sq-
sct.
;:oven' 10 L Let -
prci._wrl_.
Philadelphia, PA 19103 - 215/564 -2611 - Ferry Building - The
Embarcadero San Francisco, CA 94111 •- 415/956-4449
737 Cthiastnut,Street- -
Richard W. Huffman, AIA
John E Fernsler, AIA
Ignacio F Bunster-Ossa. AS LA
Timothy Korbelak, AIA
C Alyn Pruett, AIA
Partners:
allacp._FAIXAIC� Cjlqles B Tomlinson. Jr. AIA
avill,A W' A
Antoinette F Seymour. AICP
Associates:
Elizabeth B Clarke, AICP
Richard Collier, Jr
Gilben A. Rosenthal, AIA
WIR m A. A&6rjt,-ASLA - Senior Associates:
ThoiTdS A'Todd: FAIA.IAY—P Richard W. Bartholomew. AIA
John Beckman. AICP
Willard Foss IA
Michael D Garz A
Rodney D. Robinson. ASLA
85-72;
QVjjj a fierrim. - ,, ; John E -Clark. CPA
Henry F Bishop, ASLA
C
BERMELLO, KURKI 6 VERA, INC.
Mr. Sr_rj;1U "yV}+ tiillX1?�W�R SUITE 1400
J,1711INr 13, 1985
Pa c c two January 23, 1985
ARCHITECTS, PLANNERS 6 URBAN DESIGNERS
,Do N. BISCAYNE BOULEVARD • MIAMI• FL 33132
Mr. Sergio L. Rodriguez `
I- (°,jri: trc t, I t
oGf��eff &Wj,, F3ranfting0DepArtmdnt 1 c . '1 , : Tw4b) bF,tIVtkED
3rd Alodr.
Miami, Florida 33128 ,t
t.)11L... ]III :'I:'!-t•� L'" 'i. r(,.'I l"
t �; FBI t€drl�f �$dsa{i =1R. c?Cohan dated Jan-uarp� t16, 1,985, • addressed to
WtjxvbGuk.herEpl,regbnding the aanu�ry l6th:FAB me®ring on
tc rpi_ct L1D@rr-@mrkt.Cpntre
lures
F?'C}!06t2Q IS 1-1/ J(lL� 11,,t c•,,r!clUt'I"
t:11; i DAar tpjY 1z6df gu®� l.: t 1, I: o;
iddiesi'=several• points raised in (Ms: Cohea':s letter
t , ditedi J"uaigi)16y 1985: ,
� ram• tilt: ;' .'.` :::.•:_ ; , , ,.,.-;t.• :.: -,
1. Terremark Centre conforms to SPI-17 and does not need any re-
. ht�l�n8mettt&. , . .7.
5U(
.: ,: IC` ill: r,? ifl: -.• t ;: : i'^' .. ?' . :; ,': ..
Jx1rCdhow haLUt inuorrectlgt calculated the allowable development
g
ttten9ltq ether ih�► using thellwrong netAotcarda: in her compu-
c;}-;: c.rc i.:7 Pgtibne�>� .etr,neL•' lot rarearisl.i44,683472 tq•,.ft`:aori 313�2.'acres);
c,sc" re,indrr.}�p4tb�i�yteglttitlatdng�nihesgross�i3ottarea•::whtich for the sub -
se parcel is 188,389.056 sq. ft. and not 183,400 sq. ft. as
claimed by Ms. Cohen. Please note that in accordance with
As an "a.Ic i bidlYtanEe 9590 this grar is.l3ot: areeehasebeen; ca(laulated by comput-
special excghki" tbr5M bf'the'rTigttaiiLalid AvdLationoA_veduetpublic right -
FAR z �•,14�wed_ol¢uwett`Je and as per, Sector (6) , 66 ft. of the South Bayshore Drive
(:•,,
right-of-way since the subject property is located across from
We hope that we lq)u�&1`jtc bpw,
cb,wh1thi i'si of a,lperm&nP_ht neturBc 1
i;,�ues raised 'hp ris. Cotten' gross lot area
A copy of the work sheet utilized in calculating g
'Sincerc3... - and allowable development intensity is enclosed (see Exhibit A).
aximum development intensity allowed on the subject property
the proposed- SM-17 maximum FAR of (1.71) stated inlMsf
- 322,145.28 sq. ft.; and not the 313,614 sq.
Zdi11 A. Bermr Tlo Cohen's letter.
President
Enclosures
cc : Mr. idalter Pierce, A;.si t nr (At",
Mr. Alan S. Geld. Ftq.
Mr. t•ianuel D. Nt"(i
Mr. J0c1 '%3%we 11 ,
W�.B L WILLY A•BERMELLO A.I.A,A.I.C.P.
HARRY M. KURKI A.I A. 85-72;
REINALDO VERA A.I.A.
ti
.Mr S - aic19VRld �Aguest - ,_ I%aR)851%uary
Page two
'he proposed Terremark Centre project consists o314,00sq. f.
ices;. 8,000 sq, ft. of- g
entround floor retailf ; and 190,200 sqt. ft.
of
ri of `re
townhouse uy= 'fronting on Tigertail.
i
L I L
In ir let1fer, Ms. Cohen in eiprets that the development intensity
of tte project is 341,200, pq,,ft. and consequently in excess of the
allowed
111j5W L
ever, Ms. CohenCohen'lias again failed to properly in
to t
urts for calculation of FAR, since the
proposd-d"-S�'I,,11,r�the correctprocedoes 'not consider the Tigertail Avenue, "residential
buffer" towards the cal ation.- of FAR.
nce with SP,;7
In accorda 7, Terremark Centre has a development in
fibinsit3Fbf 327,060 sq. --for purposes of FAR and this amount is
below,th_ maximum allowed by SPI-17.
.3. Ms. Cohen states that Terremark Centre is in violation of Ordinance
9500 as a result of the parking garage. it is apparent that Ms.
Cohen has incorrectly inperpr:eted the parking structure as a
t "'." independent structure constructed for
"principal u (1. 6., an in
prin S 11
re is an ancillary
the parking garage commercial purposesY-_._._._Ji�. e je f adtd-townhouse residents and the
use serving the office ten',
general T�bl,;Lq-
As an "ancillary" facility the parking garage does not require a
special exception nor is it's area (sq. ft.) counted towards the
FA. r,.code.
technical
hope that we , P,'�Y have assisted in clarifying some of the t
ole , 11
s Ltkl i Cohen.
'I ft X, 14f 1�
,�e r_,, e
17: - r e 'Ll
rK
31
Ac ierr"e, I, �_, 1 0
22 7
i)M
T
--B *rme'l 0
t
President
Enclosures
cc:, )1r. Walter Pierce, Assistant City Manager
Mr.' Gold, Esq.
Mr. Manuel D. Medina
Mr. Joel Maxwell, Esq.
WAB:jc
135-72-
V,
L
.4
X
r
•
EXHIBIT A
S;R@SS LQT- f�Vie. VAR S PARKING CAL CL4,ATIDNAP
I LLJ
A. GEN I�RJL,114 rORMAT I ON
a., 4t .eet frontage/ .--,,Bay shore Drive at 25C ft.
*V!Mtion at Mo.62 ft,6�
attM f t .
b. Net lot area 144,683.72 sq J3 2 acre)
1,c. G1 ssIoL'area: 188,389.056 sq. ft
d.. Development,hrea: I (199,389.056). 51.21- 627,9A'.75
e. Required par ing: (227,950.75) '(1 /600) �79 parking spaces
f.cparking provided:, 1,050 parking spaces
9. F,ktess parking: 670'parking spaces
h. Bonus/parking: i {670) (200) = 134,018.0.0
227,950-75
361-;968.7� sqi.' f t.L,:1
A. Jlkximum Y.A.R. cap 322,145.28!sqir-* ft.
ILL.
i.
perking CLudlyslS
V 4
(322,145-28) -,.T 536
parking spallals
1,050. parking/provided
536, parking/required:
Ira
>
5parking/�Ycess) (200
sq. ft-/pa;rJng) =:102,
-4.
102,800 J
330;750. 75 S.J' als greater
.:
thain 322,145 28 the
max mum..development
A ensity
n t
:Y
A
L
tlC -I V I t_'
i I
F
L`
t
JiL
4• '� EXHIBIT A.
.`t
l
C' f
` `•� - , _3 tnS_ IAT- ] 9A P'AR. & BARKING CAbC+ A'T19 t
A. GENh4li-,!VrORMArrION
frontage/fo
:���Bayshore Drive at ft.
a., reet i_
dtion at V7 .62 f t U`
iertail at 2 ft.
' b..N ilo� areal,!_ 44.,683.72 eq. 2 acrefi)
c. "GY ss lot`'area: 88,�389.056 sq.
'd.. Idieldp;hent, rea: (199,389.056):. j1.2�1 27,9S6.75
e. Required par •ing: .. (227, 950.75); ` J600) 79 parking spaces
f. Parking provi-ded:,( 1,050 parking spaces •
c
g. t&Eess parking: I'1.670:parking spaces
h. Bbnus/parking: I .070) (200) = 134,018,OD
227,950.7
- 367 i%8.7 sq'i: ft..` '
i. M4'imum F.A.R. cap =�fl 8,389.056) (1-:71) I322,145.28'sgH ft.
j P� king "ar►ailysi5 v
•i •�� l 1 ti�
_� �322,145' --28)- i 536 parking spAd s
i r1;45a parking/ -qoeOed
R.. Parking/• qui2redz- I 4 ti
> ( S parking,/�dss) '(200 sq. ft./park ng)=,102,800.F.
�
102,800 _.�L.k' t �i T i _ c�ILI
1
' 330; 750 t 5 So i� ; s greater thafi 322,145128 th$ max muTn.devglopment
II c• : ±, tensity:
j �.1 tw 1 �'•r t 1
'lt
85_ f Imo•
i I -L-- 1
n r7 /.�I- r-,'1 � • o5�
6Po9s L,D AROA : 198 391. OS6 5 Q , FT -
NO. 19 A.lZ. I, rl l
MAX &. F.A. s 322,145.2$ 3st�P?.
MR(ARED FK6 : 55fo.9D
L
LAW OrPlCtS
NUtNTtL, P. A.
HorrMAN, LIPOM
R089N
GRE�NS�RG, TpA , ASKEW,
LINDA KOOb RICK ADLEI!
STEVEN [. GOLDMAN
ANTHONY J. O DONNELL. JR.
JULIE K. OFF
AMBLtR M. MOSS. JR•
MICHAEL O. ALbER
STEVEN M. GOLDSMITH
LAWRENCE S• GONDOLA
PARDO
STEVAN J. ARTIN[
J.
ZACHARY M. WOLFr
CESAR L. ALVAREZ
MATTHEW b. GOIRSON
bYRON G. PtTt RSEN
Or COUNSEL
RARAGOH
MELVIN N. GREtNbERG
ALbtRT D.OU[NTtL
RICMARO CHARD A.. ARKIN
OtUSIN ODD. ASKEW
MARILYN D. GREtNBLATT
DALE S. RECINtLLA
LUIS RtITtR
bRICKELL CONCOURS
KERRI L. bANSM
RODENT L. GROSSMAN
KENN[TH C. HOFFMAN
NICMOLAS ROCKWELI
1101 bRICKELL AVENUE
FLORIDA 33131
HILARIE SASS
NORMAN J. btNrOlho
LARRY J. HOFr MAN
MARTIN S. ROSEN
RONALO M. ROSENGARtEN
MIAMI.
MARK D. GLOOM
ARNOLD M. JArrtt
MANGOS O. JIMENEIMENE2
DAVID L. ROSE
MIAMI (305) i579.0500
BURT SPUTON
bTEV[ BULLOCK
MARTIN KALb
ROAERT p. RUbIN
KAREN D. RUNDOUIST
bROWARD (30S) b23.9n1
ROSE" K. bURLINGTON
RODENT A. KAPLAN
N[Y
JUDITH KEN NEY
STEVEN T. SAMILJAN
TELEX So.3124
ALAN N. CHASE
SUE M. Cobb
TIMOTHY E. KISH
GARY A. SAUL
CLIrrORD A. SCHULMAN
T[LECOPY (30S) 579.0718
KENDALL A. COrrtY
MARK B. DAVIS
ALAN A. KOSLOW
STEVEN J. KRAVITZ
MARTIN S. SHAPIRO
MARLENE K. SILVERMAN
100 SOUTH OIXIE HIGHWAY
OSCAR G. DE LA GUARDIA
STEVEN A. LANOY
STUART M. SINGER
WEST PALM BEACH, rLORIDA 33401
RAFAEL O. DIAZ
ALAN S. LEDERMAN
LAWRENCE IS. LEVY
TIMOTHY A. SMITH
(3015) 659.6333
ALAN t. DIMOND
CHARLES V11. EDGAR, M
NORMAN M. LIPOrF
SAMUEL SUSI
A M. BUSKIN
WRITERS DIRECT NO:
GARY M. [PBTCIN
.
GARY OLIPSON
CARLOS E. LOUMItT
YOLANDADA MELLON tARAFA
YOL
THOMAS K. EOUELS
DIANE D. r[RRARO
JUAN P. LOUMIET
GARY P. TIMIN
I
(30S 579-0880
LAURA A. GANGEMI
DEBbIt RUTH MALINBKY
PEDRO A. MARTIN
JONApHAN H. WARNER
RICHARD G. GARRETT
JOEL D. MASER
pAVID M. WELLS
DAVID J. CAYNOR
LAWRENCE GODOrb KY
ALAN M. MITCHEL
JERROLD A. WISH
R►LY TO: MIAMI orrlG[
[
N S. GOLD
ALAS.
ALA
ALICIA M. MORALES
NOSTRO
HARVEY A. GOLDMAN
LOUIS
January 23, 1985
HAND DELIVERED
Lucia Allen Dougherty
City Attorney
174 East Flagler Street
Miami, Florida 33131
Re: Response to Susan R. Cohen's 1etters 1985 f
January 15, 1985 and January
Agenda Items 48-51 on the
January 10 City Commission Hearing Agenda and the
January 16 Planning Advisory Board Meeting on
TerremamenteofrR Mionalajor Ulm SetcAallicationPermit and
bevel•
Dear Ms. Dougherty:
9, 1985
Ms. Cohen has supplemented her letter of January
d planning
with two additional letters raising certain legal an
issues. This letter responds to those additional issues as
follows:
(1) SECTION 1517252.1�Op�1TpA�� IS�EDi�GA TGUIDELINES P1�lRRNG
AND STANDARD
BONUS
Section 15172.2.1, entitled "Publicly Accessible
Parking,"
contains clearly defined guidelines and standards.
The bonus is
self-executing when the following criteria are met:
65-'72;
Lucia Allen Dougherty
January 23, 1985
page 2
1.
There must not be less than l00 parking spaces
in excess of Code.
2. The spaces must
public during normal business
activities or attractions in
public facilities.
be available to the general
and operating hours of public
the Dinner Key or adjacent
3. The entrance to the access parking facilities
must not be further than 600 feet from the main entrance of
a structure housing a major public activity, such as a per-
formance hall, specialty center, exhibition center or con-
ference facility.
4. The cumulative additional floor area permitted
under the section may not exceed .50 x gross lot area.
Such criteria avoid any improper delegation of legislative
power as considered in Cit of Miami v. Save Boic CoralAnles
Inc. 426 So.2d 1100 (Fla. d DCA 1 GaIn Save
v. Descham.�s, 242 So.2d 210 (Fla. 3d DCA 1
Brickell, for instance, the wortalgdiscretionof the r to disregardance at sthe
permitted the City Commission t•
listed criteria and instead to base a decision upon in1Deschamhst
were not listed or no criteria at all. similarly, guideline
or qualification e
the before cion forhe court
enactment devoid
the aordinances ny dand resolu-
tions in question.
As noted above, there is no question that the SPI-17 ordi-
nance contains specific criteria. What the opponents really
contend is that the criteria have no rational relationship thas
the
public parking need. The City Planning Department, however,has
testified to the contrary. The Planning Department hasprojected
the total number of spaces which realistically
can anticipated
ticipated
from the bonus in relation to the public parking neeterm. These
in the Dinner Key area for both the short and long
needs are addressed in the proposed SPI-17 ordinance which caps
the number of parking
andspaces
100that
parking spaceprovided
criteriareference to
the 600 foot radius
(2) TERREHARR NEEDS A =ZONING AK (RAISED BY
MS. COHEN'S LETTER OF JANUARY 16, 1985)
Ms. Cohen argues that the Terremark project is inconsistent
with existing zoning. This is correct but, Terremark's pending
GREENsERG, TRAURIG, ASKEW, Horrm^N, LIPoFi, RosEN & OUENTEL, P. A.
ss-7z;
r
Y.
�!
{
L
Uk
ow
Lucia Allen Dougherty
E=
January 23, 1985
ryr
l-
Page 3
`
permit
�ois contingent
s
application for bRI and ajor use pecial Perendin SPI-1 an
the p 9
upon approval by the City COmmission of
Cohen is
To the extent that M8. implying
related zoning changes.
must file for the zone change in order to
A
that the property owner
a DRI or a major use special permit, she is incorrect.
28, Miami
process
major use special permit is triggered, under Article
of spaces involved. Moreover,
Zoning Code, by the number parking
e h apter
is a "wl
;.
a major use permit are exceeded
which requires DRI review when he DRI thresholds
can operate in epen-
Accordingly, the DRI and major use process
-
.`
dently of any City initiated rezoning.
the City
Moreover, all zoning notices have been published by y
zoning amendment for the
of Miami as part of its comprehensive
Any reference to "rezoning" in the DRI notice,
in 380.06(10),
area question.
in November 1984, pursuant to Section
published Obviously, the notice was
p
Florida Statutes, is mere surplusage.
lublic� thatissues other than the
framed to advise the general pBoard
isory would have ton bet subject
DRI may be heard before the Planningitem
specific i
Commission, although such
own notice requirements which have been met.
L
to the City's
In sum:
(a) The Terremark project requires no notice of
rezoning independent of the general notices published by the
City for the comprehensive zoning amendment.
(b) The 60-day notice was advertised in accordance
with Section 380.06(10), Florida Statutes.
(c) The major use special permit for the Terremark
Centre has been properly advertised both before the Planning
Advisory Board and the City Commission.
(d) All revisions to the ADA have been available in
the files of the Regional Planning Council and the City of
Miami. As noted in the report of the Regional Planning
Council, these revisions reduced the scale of the project
and accordingly did not substantially change the ADA which
has been on file with
the City and the Regional Planning
Council since July, 1984.
GREENneRG, TRAURIG, ASKEW, HorrMAN, Uporr, RosEN & OUENTEL, P. A.
ss-7z'
f
Lucia Allen Dougherty
January 23, 1985
Page 4
(3) S$CTIONS 3508.1 AND 3507 HAVE VIOLATED IN
THAT THS ORIGINAL TRRRBMARR APPLICATION FOR
REZONING WAS NOT HEARD BY THB PAB IN 60 DAYS
The 60-day requirement in Section 3508.2, City of Miami
li-
Zoning Code, is intended to be for the protection of the appli-
cant. Here the applicant has agreed that its original app
City of Miami considered the
tion would not be heard while the
Bayshore Drive s, c uldFurthermore
ing
law
as a matter of law, not consider the napplication ybecause
was
the report of the South Florida
1985.Regional
Sectionan380 06(12)lCouncil
Florida
not
rendered until January,
Statutes. According to Section 3508.2, City Zoning Code, this
report was required in order for the public hearing to be held.
Accordingly, the Planning Advisory Board took action on the modi-
fied application within 60 days after the South Florida Regional
Planning Council staff report was submitted to the City of Miami.
What Ms. Cohen misunderstands, is that the original
Terremark application has proceeded under the major use special
permit as modified. By modification of the Aadhthe
ewi placa-
tion for special use major permit, the applicantin lieu
thdrawn
its original application for RO-3/8 rezoning and,
thereof, has supported the City's comprehensive rezoning for the
Bayshore district.
(4) THE ROMINING POINTS SEPARATELY �PjDDRESSED ISED IN KS -
BY O S MR.. LETTER
WILL $
BERiIELLO, THE PROJECT ARCHITECT
Thank you again for your attention to this matter.
ASG/wp
GREENSCRG, TRAURIG, ASKEW, HOFFMAN. LIPOFF, ROSCN a oUENTEL, P. A. 85- ` 2-
a
A
#
I
s
i F fit,
..%+k3i1.3c"� r •,.
- '`�
t.� kg.
nYYLnnu
LAW OFFICES *-
(� GPEENbERG, TpA IG, ASKEW, WorrMAN, LIPOrP, RO$tk i�UENtEL, P.A.
LINDA KOOSRICK ADLER
MICHAEL O. ALBERTINt
CESAR L. ALVAREZ
RUDOLPM P. ARAGON
RICNARD A. ARKIN
NEUBIN ODD. ASKtW
ktRRI L. SARS14
MILARIt BASS
NORMAN J. StNPOMD
MARK O. BLOOM
BUNTBRutoN
STEVE BULLOCK
ROBERT K. BURLINGTON
ALAN N. CHASE
SUE M. core
KENDALL S. CO«EY
MARK B. DAVIS
OSCAR G. DE LA GUARDIA
RAeAEL O. DIAZ
ALAN T. DIMOND
CHARLES W. EDGAR.
GARY M. EPSTEIN
THOMAS It. tOUELS
DIANE O. PEMMARO
LAURA A. GANOEMI
RICHARD 0. GARRETT
DAVID J. GAYNOR
LAWRENCEG000RSKY
ALAN S. GOLD
HARVEY A. GOLDMAN
STEVEN t. GOLDMAN
STEVEN M. GOLDSMITH
LAWRENCE S, GORDON
MATTHEW D. GORSON
MELVIN N. GREENBERG
MARILYN O. GRtENBLATT
pOBtRT L. GROSSMAN
KENNETH C. HOrrMAN
LARRY J. HOFkMAN
ARNOLD M. JA«'Et
MARCOS D. JIMENEZ
MARTIN KALB
ROBERT A. KAPLAN
JUDITH KtNNEY
TIMOTHY E. KISH
ALAN B. KOSLOW
STEVEN J. KRAVITZ
STEVEN A. LANDY
ALAN S. LEDERMAN
LAWRENCE B. LEVY
NORMAN H. LIPO:r
GARY D. LIPSON
CARLOS E. LOUMIET
JUAN P. LOUMIET
DEBBIE RUTH MALINSKY
PtORO A. MARTIN
JOEL D. MASER
ALAN M. MITC14EL
ALICIA M. MORALES
LOUIS NOSTRO
BAND DELIVERED
Lucia Allen Dougherty
City Attorney
174 East Flagler Street
Miami, Florida 33131
ANTHONY J. O DONNELL. JR.
JULIE K. OLOtMORF
STEVEN J. PARDO
BYRON G. PETERStN
ALBERT D. OUENTEL
DALE S. RECINtLLA
LUIS RtITtR
NICHOLAS ROCKWELL
MARVIN S. ROSEN
RONALD M. ROSENGANTEN
DAVID L. ROSS
RottRT D. RUBIN
KAREN D. RUNDOUIST
STEVEN T. SAMILJAN
GARY A. SAUL
CLItPORD A. SCHULMAN
MARTIN S. SHAPIRO
MARLENE K. SILVERMAN
STUART H. SINGER
TIMOTHY A. SMITH
SAMUEL SUSI
HEReERT M. SUSKIN
YOLANDA MELLON TARAfA
GARY P. TIMIN
ROBERT H. TRAURIG
JONATHAN H. WARNER
DAVID M. WELLS
JERROLD A. WISH
January 22, 1985
Re: Response to Letter of Susan R. Cohen
Dear Lucia:
AMBLER H. MOSS, JR.
ZACHARY H. WOL«
Or COUNSEL
BMICKELL CONCOURS
1401 BMICKELL AVENUE
MIAMI, tLOPIDA 33131
MIAMI (305) 579.0500
800WARD (305) 523. Bill
TELEX 80 - 3124
TELteOPY (305) 570.0718
100 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY
WEST PALM BEACH. FLORIDA 3340,
(305)859.8333
WRITER'S DIRECT NO:
(305) 579-0880
REPLY TO: MIAMI OFFICE
Please be advised that this office represents Grove Bay
Plaza, Ltd., the owners of the Terremark Centre property located
in Miami (Coconut Grove), Florida. We have received a letter to
your attention from Susan R. Cohen, Esq., dated January 9, 1985
relative to Agenda Items 40(a) through 51, as they appeared on
the January loth City Commission Agency. In her letter,
Ms. Cohen raises several alleged procedural defects which she
claims divests the City Commission of jurisdiction to hear the
above agenda items. We respectfully disagree with Ms. Cohen's
analysis and offer our comments with respect to the following
points included in her letter:
85-'72;
� 1.
OW -
Lucia Allen
January 22,
Page 2
1.
Dougherty
1985
Ms. Cohens' states that the parking bonus in
S 15172.2.1 of the proposed SPI-17 Ordinance allows rezoning to
"any land use." This is incorrect. The SPI-17 zoning district
is an overlay district which modifies regulations within the
existing district only to the extent indicated in the SPI regula-
tions. See Section 15172. Accordingly, use of the phrase "for
any any use" in S 15172.2.1 must be read in conjunction with the
remainder of the SPI-17 ordinance. The effect is that the park-
ing bonus is available for any use within the R03/6 district. We
would have no objection if the proposed SPI-17 regulations were
specifically clarified to this effect.
2. THE NOTICE OF A CHANGE FROM RG/5 TO R03/6 I5
FATALY DEFECTIVE IN THAT AN ORDINARY CITIZEN
WITHOUT ZONING KNOWLEDGE WOULD NOT KNOW THAT
%....o�o^nw neuc Una unl /A THMME RETAIL LAND USE.
A notice of hearing on a proposed ordinance is not
defective because of ambiguity where it properly describes the
land in issue and recites that the proposal is to change the
zoning classification from one specific use district to another
specific use district. See Bregar v. Britton, 75 So.2d 753, 756
(Fla. 1954), where the Florida Supreme Court held a notice of
publication sufficient where it clearly stated in the notice that
the petition upon which the hearing was to be held was an appli-
cation to "rezone from A to C-3" even though the notice did not
contain the words "drive-in theater" which was the desired use.
Absent a specific requirement in the relevant statute or
ordinance, the notice need not include the whole text of proposed
ordinance. Anderson, American Law of Zoning, S 4.14, pages 208-
209.
The cases cited by Ms. Cohen do not support the claimed
impropriety of the public notice. Rather, these cases involved
questions where the properties were rezoned to a classification
not specifically included in the notice or where the notice was
so fataly vague as to not give the public any reasonable oppor-
tunity to understand what zoning change would be implemented if
it were adopted. Neither situation exists under the present
circumstances.
GREENecRG, TRAURIG, ASKEW, HOFFMAN. Uporr, ROSEN & OUENTEL, P. A.
ss-7z.
;3 }
AY' 1
� fi
1,-.Ss xr�.� e��Aa.��.n _ F.L ... t.a_a •! �_. ab !S-�i. ,.x Ri rTa #i3.. ai?i............. ro_
y
f
Lucia Allen Dougherty
January 22, 1985
Page 3
3. THE PROPOSED REZONING CHANGES THE MIAMI_ CONPRE-
HENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN BY CHANGING THB lEDIUM
DENSITY RE IDENTIAL LAND USE IN THE RG STRIP
USE RO
ALONG TIGER TAIL TO A RE INTENSE LAND
SECTIONz- UNDER us 19172•
We have noted above that Ms. Cohen is incorrect in her
interpretation that a more intense land use is permitted under
exists under the underlying
the parking bonus than what otherwise
zoning district. Moreover, the proposed City rezoning does not
change the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. Rather, it is
by only residential uses
consistent with the Plan permitting
adjacent to Tiger Tail or, if no residential uses are to be con-
strutted, then requiring that a 100 foot landscape buffer be
Representatives of the Planning Department have
!
established.
already testified at hearings before the Planning Advisory Board
Neigh-
that such uses are consistent with the Miami Comprehensive
further consistent with the adopted Bayshore
boyhood Plan and are
Drive Development Study which constitutes a refinement of the
Plan to the neighborhood in question.
4. THE ZONING APPLICATIONS FILED BY THE CITY ARE IN
VIOLATION OF SECTION 51 , CITY OF MIAMI CODE
TH MONTH RULE
Section 3514 does not limit the City Commission from
considering or acting upon the implementation of a comprehensive
zoning amendment for an area. Presumably, Ms. Cohen is referring
to § 3514.3 which provides:
"Whenever the City Commission has changed the
zoning classification of property by amend -
went, the Zoning Board shall not thereafter
consider any petition for rezoning for all
or any part of the same property for a
period of 18 months from the date of such
action."
This section contemplates that a petition for rezoning would be
filed by a property owner who would then have further hearing by
the Zoning Board on the petition. This section does not apply,
however, where the zoning action is question is initiated by a
city department. Under § 3503, Miami Zoning Code, public hear-
ings on such applications are heard by the Planning Advisor
Board, not by the Zoning Board. Accordingly, Section 3514.3 is
i pan plicable.
Bs-7z-
GREENBERG. TRAURIG, ASKEW, HOFFMAN, LIPoFF, ROSEN & OUENTEL, P. A.
Y
J 'Yy1.
Lucia Allen Dougherty
January 22, 1955
Page 4
5. THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 15172.1 MAY BE
rna�a.c�a. •
i
You have previously addressed this issue at the City
Commission hearing and correctly ruled that private covenants do
not control or limit City initiated zoning actions. In addition,
a review of the covenant proferred by Ms. Cohen indicates that it
is not inconsistent with the proposed zoning action.
6. SECTION 166.041(3) (c) (1) . FLORIDA STATUTES, HAS
BEEN VIOLATED IN THAT THE PROPOSED SPI- 7
ORDINANCE WAS NOT IN THE FILE AVAILABLE F R
PUBLIC REVIEW.
At the first reading, the Planning Department dis-
agreed as a matter of fact with Ms. Cohen and testified that the
SPI-17 ordinance was filed of record thirty days prior to the
date set for the public hearing. In any event, Ms. Cohen over-
looks that S 166.041(3)(c)(1) applies only to those property
owners whose land is to be rezoned or ated by the proposed
change in permitted use. This special class of land owners is to
receive actual notice of the change by mail. The notice is only
required to state the substance of the proposed ordinance as it
affects that property owner as well as the time and place (if the
public hearings on the ordinance. Contrary to Ms. Cohen's inter-
pretations, the whole ordinance need not be included in or with
the notice. The notice is also to be kept available for public
inspection, although the general public is separately notified by
newspaper publication, posting and, and, where applicable,
courtesy notices. Such publication occurred in accordance with
City requirements and the SPI-17 ordinance proposal was available
at least from that date.
Thank
matters.
ASG:wp
you in advance for your consideration of these
Sincerel
Alan S. Gold
cc: Susan Cohen, Esq. (By Hand Delivery)
Joel Maxwell, Esq. (By Hand Delivery)
GREEN.ERG. TRAURIG. ASKEW, HOFFMAN. UPOFF, ROSEN & OUENTEL. P. A.
i
Lucia Allen Dougherty
January 22, 1985
Page 4
S. THE PROVISIONS OF
SISTENT WITH AN E
PRECLUDE THE S I-
PARCEL.
ON 15172.1 MAY BE
You have previously addressed this issue at the City
Commission hearing and correctly ruled that private covenants do
not control or limit City initiated zoning actions. In addition,
a review of the covenant proferred by Ms. Cohen indicates that it
is not inconsistent with the proposed zoning action.
6. SECTION 166.041(3) (C) (1),, FLORIDA STATUTES, HAS
2210"W TrTr►T Ar"WT1 TU TIIST 11w" 1010ADeV2112 1 CDT— 7
PUBLIC REVIEW.
At the first reading, the Planning Department dis-
agreed as a matter of fact with Ms. Cohen and testified that the
SPI-17 ordinance was filed of record thirty days prior to the
date set for the public hearing. In any event, Ms. Cohen over-
looks that S 166.041(3)(c)(1) applies only to those property
owners whose land is to be rezoned or eiffected by the proposed
change in permitted use. This special class of land owners is to
receive actual notice of the change by mail. The notice is only
required to state the substance of the proposed ordinance as it
affects that property owner as well as the time and place of the
public hearings on the ordinance. Contrary to Ms. Cohen's inter-
pretations, the whole ordinance need not be included in or with
the notice. The notice is also to be kept available for public
inspection, although the general public is separately notified by
newspaper publication, posting and, and, where applicable,
courtesy notices. Such publication occurred in accordance with
City requirements and the SPI-17 ordinance proposal was available
at least from that date.
Thank
matters.
ASG:wp
you in advance for your consideration of these
Sincerel
Alan S. Gold
cc: Susan Cohen, Esq. (By Hand Delivery)
Joel Maxwell, Esq. (By Hand Delivery)
85-'7Z
GREENOERG, TRAURIG, ASKEW, HOFFMAN. LIPOFF, RoSEN & OUENTEL, P. A.
y
i {
e t
�rsdPr n.l_r_ • ,- ! tt. �. • �` - t. , . t._ - _ .. „ _ _ ... . Spy :d s �'°..',
z:.
mg
LAW OFFICES
GREENSERG, TRAURIG, ASKEW, HOFFMAN, LIPOFF, ROSEN & OUENTEL, P.A.
LINDA KOOBRICK ADLER
MICHAEL O. ALBERTINE
CESAR L. ALVAREZ
RUDOLPH F. ARAGON
RICHARD A. ARKIN
REUBIN O.O. ASKEW
KERRI L. MARSH
HILARIE BASS
NORMAN J. SENFOPO
MARK D. BLOOM
BURT BRUTON
STEVE BULLOCK
ROBERT K. BURLINGTON
ALAN R. CHASE
SUE M. COBB
KENDALL B. COFFEY
MARK S. DAVIS
OSCAR G. DE LA GUARDIA
RAFAEL O. DIAZ
ALAN T. DIMOND
CHARLES W. EDGAR, III
GARY M. EPSTEIN
THOMAS k. EOUELS
DIANE D. FERRARO
LAURA A. GANGEMI
RICHARD G. GARRETT
DAVID J. GAYNOR
LAWRENCE GOOOFSKY
ALAN S. GOLD
HARVEY A. GOLDMAN
STEVEN E. GOLDMAN
STEVEN M. GOLDSMITH
LAWRENCE S. GORDON
MATTHEW B. GORSON
MELVIN N. GREENBERG
MARILYN O. GREENBLATT
ROBERT L. GROSSMAN
KENNETH C. HOFFMAN
LARRY J. HOFFMAN
ARNOLD M. JAFFEE
MARCOS D. JIMENEZ
MARTIN KALB
ROBERT A. KAPLAN
JUDITH KENNEY
TIMOTHY E. KISH
ALAN S. KOSLOW
STEVEN J. KRAVITZ
STEVEN A. LANOY
ALAN S. LEDERMAN
LAWRENCE S. LEVY
NORMAN H. LIPOFF
GARY D. LIPSON
CARLOS E. LOUMIET
JUAN P. LOUM IF
DEBBIE RUTH MALINSKY
PEDRO A. MARTIN
JOEL O. MASER
ALAN M. MITCHEL
ALICIA M. MORALES
LOUIS NOSTRO
HAND DELIVERED
Lucia Allen Dougherty
City Attorney
174 East Flagler Street
Miami, Florida 33131
ANTHONY J. O DONNELL. JR.
JULIE K. OLDEHOFF
STEVAN J. PARDO
BYRON G. PETERSEN
ALBERT D. OUENTEL
DALE S. RECINELLA
LUIS REITER
NICHOLAS ROCKWELL
MARTIN S. ROSEN
RONALD M. ROSENGARTEN
DAVID L. ROSS
ROBERT D. RUSIN
KAREN D. RUNDOUIST
STEVEN T. SAMILJAN
GARY A. SAUL
C IJ FFORD A. SCHULMAN
MARTIN S. SHAPIRO
MARLENE K. SILVERMAN
STUART H. SINGER
TIMOTHY A. SMITH
SAMUEL SUSI
HERBERT M. SUSKIN
YOLANDA MELLON TARAFA
GARY P. TIM IN
ROBERT H. TRAURIG
JONATHAN H. WARNER
DAVID M. WELLS
JERROLD A. WISH
AMBLER H. MOSS, JR.
ZACHARY H. WOLFF
OF COUNSEL
BRICKELL CONCOURS
1401 BRICKELL AVENUE
MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131
MIAMI (305) 579-0500
SPOWARD (305) 523 - Bill
TELEX 80-3124
TELECOPY (305) 579-0716
100 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY
WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401
(305) 659.6333
WRITERS DIRECT NO'
January 23, 1985
(305) 579-0880
REPLY TO: MIAMI OFFICE
z-
ri r• �•_
f�1
Re: Response to Susan R. Cohen's Letters of
January 15, 1985 and January 16, 1985 -
Agenda Items 48-51 on the �_
January 10 City Commission Hearing Agenda and the
January 16 Planning Advisory Board Meeting on
Terremark Centre Major Use Special Permit and
Development of Regional Impact Application
Dear Ms. Dougherty:
Ms. Cohen has supplemented her letter of January 9, 1985
with two additional letters raising certain legal and planning
issues. This letter responds to those additional issues as
follows:
(l) DIONl2. R TINAGUIDELINES
ANSTANDARDSFOADMI ADMINISTERING THE PARKING
BONUS
Section 15172.2.1, entitled "Publicly Accessible Parking,"
contains clearly defined guidelines and standards. The bonus is
self-executing when the following criteria are met:
85--'72•
�4
2_
Lucia Allen Dougherty
January 23, 1985
Page 2
1.
There must not be less than 100 parking spaces
in excess of Code.
general
2, The spaces must be available to the 9 ublic
normal business and operating hours of p
public during or adjacent
activities or attractions in the Dinner Key
public facilities.
3, The entrance to the access parking facilities
in etrne of
must not be further than 600 fefrom the activity,�asuchnasaacper-
a structure housing a major public
con-
formance hall, specialty center, exhibition center or
ference facility. d
4.
under the
The cumulative additional
section may not exceed .50 x
of
Such criteria avoid any improper l delega
SaveoBricke111Avenuee
power as considered in Cit •f M In Save
Inc. 426 So.2d 1100 (Fla. 3d DCAFla.3 3dn DCA t 1 o Coral Gab_ les
v Deschamps, 242 So.2d 210 ( of the ordinance at issue
Brickell, for instance, the wordingto
ermitted the City Commission toteladdecisionnupon criteria that
p in Deschamps,
listed criteria and instead to as Deschamps,
were not listed or no criteria at all. Similarly*nadard, g
the record before the court was devoid h any
or qualification for the enactment of the ordinances and resolu-
tions in question.
o question that the SPI-17 ordi-
As noted above, there is n
nance contains specific criteria. What the opponents really
to the
contend is that the criteria have no rational relationship
however, has
public parking need. The City Planning De rtment has projected
testified to the contrary. The Planning Pa
public parking needs required
the total number of spaces whichhreealistically can be anticipate
from the bonus in relation to P
in the Dinner Key area for both the short and long term. These
needs are addressed in the proposed SPI-17 ordinance reference whichaps
arking spaces that can be provided by
the number of p parking space criteria.
the 600 foot radius and the 100 p
R NEEDS A REZONING ANENDPWNT (RAISED BY
(2) TSRRE „nutWIr. LETTER OF JANUARY 16, 1985)
floor area permitte
gross lot area.
Ms. Cohen argues that the Terremark project is inconsistent
with existing zoning. This is correct but, Terremark's pending
85--72;
GREENOERG, TRAURIG, ASKEW, HOFFMAN, UPOFF, RosEN & OUENTEL, P. A.
Lucia Allen Dougherty
January 23, 1985
`
Page 3
gent
application for DRI and major use special permitending SPItln and
the p
i
upon approval by the City Commission of
To the extent that Ms. Cohen is implying
5
related zoning changes.
file for the zone change in order tot.
that the property owner must
a major use special permit, she is income
28, Miami
process a DRI or
major use special permit is triggered, under Article
involved. Moreover,
Code, by the number of parking spaces
zoning ermit" under Chapter 380.
�� development p
.
a major use permit is a ds are
RI t
requires DRI review when the
Drocessecanloperateeindepen-
which
use
Accordingly, the DRI and mayor P
dently of any City initiated rezoning.
Moreover, all zoning notices have been published by the City
its comprehensive zoning amendment for the
art of ��
of Miami as P reference to "rezoning in the DRI notice,
in Any n 380.06(10),
s
area question. to Section
pursuant
published in November 1984, p Obviously, the notice was
Florida Statutes, is mere surplusage.
P that issues other than the
the City
framed to advise the general
be be before the PlanningAdvisory Board and
to be subject
r
DRI may
Commission, although such specific items would have
have been met.
F . _
City's own notice requirements which
to the
in sum:
(a) The Terremark project require
rezoning independent of the general notices
City for the comprehensive zoning amendment.
s no notice of
published by the
(b) The 60-day notice was advertised
with Section 380.06(10), Florida Statutes.
(c) The
Centre has been
Advisory Board
in accordance
major use special permit for
properly advertised both before
and the City Commission.
the Terremark
the Planning
(d) All revisions to the ADA have been available in
the files of the Regional Planning
of the 1l and Regionale Planning
City Of
Miami. As noted in the Pject
Council, these revisions reducethe scale ti lly changed thehADArwhich
and accordingly did not subst n
has been on file with the City and the Regional Planning
Council since July, 1984.
ss-7z.
GREENBERG. TRAURIG, ASKEW, HOFFMAN, UPOFF, ROSEN & OUENTEL, P. A.
S Y
1r.
Yt�l
�f
� i 1K
d
Lucia Allen Dougherty
January 23, 1985
a Page 4
RAF
(3) SECTIONS 3508.1 AND 3507 HAVE BEENAPPLICATION
CAT oVIOLA�ED IN
FOR
ORIGINAL TERREMARR
THAT TOE By THE PA
IN 60 DAYS
REZONING WAS NOT ��
requirement in Section 3508.2, City of Miami
The 60-day q li-
Zoning Code, is intended to be for eed that o its t original happlPca-
cant. Here the applicant has agreed
tion would not be heard while the City of Miami considered the
Advisory Board,
Bayshore Drive study. Furthermore, the Planningthe iderAdvisory
because
as a matter of law►could not uth Florida Regional Planning
Council was not
` the report of the So 1985. Section 380.06(12), Florida
rendered until January, 2, City Zoning Code, this
1 Statutes. According to Section 3508.
' report was required in order for the public hearing to be held.
Accordingly,
the Planning Advisory Board took action on the modi-
fied application within 60 fldays s submi ted to theter the South lCity ofeMiami.
Planning Council staff repot
is that the original
What Ms. Cohen misunderstands, special
Terremark application has proceeded under the major use lica-
modification of the ADA and the app
permit as modified. BY permit, the applicant has withdrawn
tion for special use major p
application for RO-3/8 rezoning and, in lieu
,.
its original for the
F.
thereof, has supported the City's comprehensive rezoning
.:; Bayshore district.
IN SED
THE REMAINING POINTS RAI ADDRESSED .BYE MR • S WINE
(4) WILL
BE SEPAAELY
WI
BgRMSLLO, THE pROjECT ARCHITECT
Thank you again for your attention to this matter.
.` Sinc XGol
A an
ASG/wp
BS-7z'
GREEN BERG, TRAURIG, ASKEW, HOFFMAN. LIPOFF, ROSEN & OUENTEL, P. A.
,rl
53f Lyj, � Iys 1
r
r
��` S �; ♦.d• ' C 'L r'1 i t
u� y'
.2Y PL' � �:,
�
LAW OFFICES
GREENBERG, TRAURIG, ASKEW, HOPPMAN, LIPOPP, ROSEN & OUENTEL, P. A.
LINDA KOOBRICK ADLER
MICHAEL O. ALSERTINE
CESAR L. ALVAREZ
RUDOLPH F. ARAGON
RICHARD A. ARKIN
PEUSIN O D. ASKEW
KERRI L. 9ARSH
HILARIE BASS
NORMAN J. BENFORO
MARK D. BLOOM
BURT BRUTON
STEVE BULLOCK
ROBERT K. BURLINGTON
ALAN R. CHASE
SUE M. COSS
KENDALL B. COFFEY
MARK B. DAVIS
OSCAR G. DE LA GUARDIA
RAFAEL O. DIAZ
ALAN T. DIMOND
CHARLES W. EDGAR. III
GARY M. EPSTEIN
THOMAS K. EOUELS
DIANE D. FERRARO
LAURA A. GANGEMI
RICHARD G. GARRETT
DAVID J. GAYNOR
LAWRENCE GODOFSKY
ALAN S. GOLD
HARVEY A. GOLDMAN
STEVEN E. GOLDMAN
STEVEN M. GOLDSMITH
LAWRENCE S. GORDON
MATTHEW S. GORSON
MELVIN N. GREENBERG
MARILYN D. GREEN13LATT
ROBERT L. GROSSMAN
KENNETH C. HOFFMAN
LARRY J. HOFFMAN
ARNOLD M. JAFFEE
MARCOS D. JIMENEZ
MARTIN KALB
ROBERT A. KAPLAN
JUDITH KENNEY
TIMOTHY E. KISH
ALAN B. KOSLOW
STEVEN J. KRAVITZ
STEVEN A. LANDY
ALAN S. LEDERMAN
LAWRENCE S. LEVY
NORMAN H. LIPOFF
GARY D. LIPSON
CARLOS E. LOUMIET
JUAN P. LOUMIET
DEBBIE RUTH MALINSKY
PEDRO A. MARTIN
JOEL D. MASER
ALAN M. MITCHEL
ALICIA M. MORALES
LOUIS NOSTRO
HAND DELIVERED
Lucia Allen Dougherty
City Attorney
174 East Flagler Street
Miami, Florida 33131
ANTHONY J O DONNELL. JR.
JULIE K. OLDEHOFF
STEVAN J. PARDO
SYRON G. PETERSEN
ALBERT D. OUENTEL
DALE S. RECINELLA
LUIS REITER
NJCHOLAS ROCKWELL
MARTIN S. POSEN
RONALD M. ROSENGARTEN
DAVID L. ROSS
ROBERT D. RUBIN
KAREN D. PUNDOUIST
STEVEN T. SAMILJAN
GARY A. SAUL
CLIFFORD A. SC14ULMAN
MARTIN S. SHAPIRO
MARLENE K. SILVERMAN
STUART H. SINGER
TIMOTHY A. SMITH
SAMUEL SUSI
HERBERT M. SUSKIN
YOLANDA MELLON TARAFA
GARY P. TIM IN
ROBERT H. TRAURIG
JONATHAN H. WARNER
DAVID M. WELLS
JERROLD A. WISH
January 22, 1985
Re: Response to Letter of Susan R. Cohen
Dear Lucia:
AMBLER H. MOSS. JR.
ZACHARY H. WOLFF
OF COUNSEL
BPICKELL CONCOURS
1401 BPICKELL AVENUE
MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131
MIAMI (305) 579 0500
BROWARD (305) 523 Bill
TELEX 80 3124
TELECOPY (305) 579-0718
100 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY
WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401
(305) 659 6333
WRITER'S DIRECT NO:
(305) 579-0880
REPLY TO: MIAMI OFFICE
cam__
Please be advised that this office represents Grove Bay
Plaza, Ltd., the owners of the Terremark Centre property located
in Miami (Coconut Grove), Florida. We have received a letter to
your attention from Susan R. Cohen, Esq., dated January 91 1985
relative to Agenda Items 40(a) through 51, as they appeared on
the January loth City Commission Agency. In her letter,
Ms. Cohen raises several alleged procedural defects which she
claims divests the City Commission of jurisdiction to hear the
above agenda items. We respectfully disagree with Ms. Cohen's
analysis and offer our comments with respect to the following
points included in her letter:
S5-'71
I
Lucia Allen Dougherty
January 22, 1985
Page 2
1.
ALL LAND USE coNTROLS
FATALY AND DEFECT 1v nL i - v ham+` -
Ms. Cohens' states that the parking
bonus in
§ 15172. 2.1 of ��the proposed SPI-17 ordinance he SPI 17allows
rezoning
ezng n 9 district
any land use. This is incorrect.
is an overlay district which modifies regulations within the
existing district only to the extent indicated in the SPI regula-
tions. See Section 15172. Accordingly, use of the phrase "for
any any use" in § 15172.2.1 must be read in conjunction with the
remainder of the SPI-17 ordinance. The effect is that the park-
ing bonus is available for any use within the 223/6 district. We
would have no objection if the proposed SPI-17 regulations were
specifically clarified to this effect.
2.
A notice of hearing on a proposed ordinance is not
it describes the
defective because of ambiguity where properly
recites that the proposal is to change the
land in issue and
zoning classification from one specific use district to another
75 So.2d 753, 75
=:
specific use district. See Bregar v. Britton,
Florida Supreme Court held a notice of
r.<•.
(Fla. 1954), where the
sufficient where it clearly stated in the notice that
held was an appli
�,
publication
hearing was to be
the petition upon which the-
though the notice did no
cation to "rezone from A to C-3" even
"drive-in theater" which was the desired use.
contain the words
Absent a specific requirement in the relevant statute or
text of propose
ordinance, the notice need not include the whole
American Law of Zoning, § 4.14, pages 208-
ordinance. Anderson,
V
209.
The cases cited by Ms. Cohen do not support the claimed
impropriety of the public notice. Rather, these cases involved
questions where the properties were rezoned to a classification
not specifically included in the notice or where the notice was
so fataly vague as to not give the public any reasonable oppor-
tunity to understand
Neitherzoning
situation change
existswould
be under implemented
it were adopted. present
circumstances.
85-'72-
GREENBERG, TRAURIG, ASKEW, HOFFMAN, LIPOFF, ROSEN OUENTEI., P. A.
a?
r
��"�; w iX,iv�%��."f`�-'�"..>�'ti4 �'. 5�7�✓n>�'S % $ YG �, ., .. � � .r.
� ..., �i t � ,...t $�r . k
:.�'�" y�{li �{v;.�4�r�' J
Lucia Allen Dougherty
January 22, 1985
Page 3
3. THE PROPOSED REZONING CHANGES THE 141AMI COMPRE-
HENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN BY CHANGING rHE INDIUM
DENSITY DENTIAL LAND USE IN
NtTHE AG AND 9 RIP
SECT I ON i D JL f4ePLUS
We have noted above that Ms. Cohen is incorrectesunder
interpretation thathan what otherwisher
e intense e exists eunde is permitted
underlying
the parking bonus City rezoning does not
zoning district. Moreover, the proposed
change the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood
onlyanresidential. RatheL. luses
consistent with the Plan y permitting
adjacent to Tiger Tail nthat r' if oar 100 efootl landscape buffei uses are to be con -
be
structed, then requiring established. Representatives of the Planning Department have
p already testified at hearings before the Planning Advisory Board
that such uses are consistentconsistentwith theadopted
with the Mimi ipvgayshoNeigh-
borhood Plan and are further
Drive Development Study which constitutes a refinement of the
Plan to the neighborhood in question.
4. THE ZONING APPLICATIONS FILED BY THE CITY ARE IN
VIOLATION OF SECTION 3514.3, CITY OF MIAMI CODE
Section 3514 does not limit the City Commission from
considering or acting upon the P msumably tMs. Cohencispreferriny
zoning amendment for an area.
to § 3514.3 which provides:
"Whenever the City Commission has changedthe
b
zoning classification of property y
amend-
ment, the Zoning Board shall not there fter
consider any petition for rezoning
all
or any part of the same property for a
period of 18 months from the date of such
action."
This section contemplates that a petition for rezoning would be
filed by a property owner who would then have further hearing by
the Zoning Board on the 'petition. tiois,hquest onis lois_dinitiated es not apply,
yya
however, w ere the zoningpublic hear -
city department. Under § 3503, Miami Zon the Cplanning Advisor•
ings on such applications are heard by
Board, not by the Zoning Board. Accordingly, Section 51 .s is
inapplicable.
85-'72;
GREENBERG. TRAURIG, ASKEW, HOFFMAN, UPOFF, ROSEN & OUENTEL, P. A.
IN!��f — s
s..
P ',3
a;
F
• E����F {'J", E 37 } .'s :MryV'.. ..Dc Y. hi 'f ^.�`+f ,#ar..�M.r��Rki/3al`TYi A.". Ye 3hti:4.i'4C'Af..4:�1C'S^2G.9�1�'JMCNbC
} � Lucia Allen Dougherty
January 22, 1985
Page 4
,
i SECTION 5THE PROVISIONS OF 15172.1 MAY BE INCON
. -
e j SISTENT WITH AN EXISTING COVENANT AND THEREFORE
PRECLUDE THE SPI- FROM BEING APPLIED TO THAT
PARCEL.
You have previously addressed this issue at tnts he City
Commission hearing and correctly a zonin at I acticnsivate Invena addition
not control or limit City initiate rls.yCohen indicates that it
a review of the covenant proferred by
is not inconsistent with the proposes zoning action.
6. SECTION 166.041(3)(C)(1)• FLORIDA STATUTES, HAS
R
IFOR
BEEN VIOLATED IN THE HFILE A AMOLE
NOT IN
ORDINANCE WAS
PUBLIC REVIEW.
At the first reading, the Planning Department dis-
testifiedthat the
hMs. Cohen and
agreed as a matt ecord thirty days prior to the
filed of revntMs
SPI-17 ordinance was Cohen over -
date set for the public hearing. In any
those property
looks that 166.041(3)(c)(1) applies on1 to
or affected by the proposed
owners whose land is to be rezoned s to
in use. This special ma l.° nnoticerislonly
change permitted The
receive actual notice of the change b� it
the
required to state the substance of
well the timed and place oas t
affects that property owner as
hearings on the ordinance. Contrary to Ms. Cohen's inter-
be included in or with
public
pretations, the whole ordinance need not
to be kept available for public
the notice. The notice is also
the general public is separately notiicable,
_
'
inspection, although
newspaper publication, posting an d, and, where ai.p
in ac cordance with
a
courtesy notices. SuchhepSPI117tordinanceon rpaopos 1 weas available
r
City requirements and
at least from that date.
Thank you in advance for your consideration of these
matters.
1
Sincerely
Alan S . Gold
ASG:wp
cc: Susan Cohen, Esq. (By Hand Delivery)
Joel Maxwell, Esq. (By Hand Delivery)
65-'72-
GREENBERG, TRAURIG, ASKEW, HOFFMAN, LIPOFF, ROSEN 8t OUENTEL, P. A.
I
J
t
,
r
r
Council
p
south florida regional lanning
Obli 2999
K'
IAC) 30Y tz_
3,140
X"
January St 1985
The Honorable Maurice Ferre
Mayor, City of Miami
cDri
3500 pan Amer
an Florida 33133ve
Miami,
Dear May Ferre: council has officially adopted the
Mixed Use
South Florida Regional planning erremark Centre Mix
The SO impact report for T t of community
enclosed Regional a Florida Dap This report is
I forwarded copies to th
Development and h Florida Water Management District impact
Affairs, and the SOut I ing the Development of Regional
provided for your use in review Statutes.
Florida
ant to Chapter 380 lution
pursuant
is available to assist in the reso
mechanism
cil has no legal
While the staff of the Council the Coun t through appeal
g the report,
of any matter regardin
through which it can act on this report again, exceP
procedures
requires that the City render a Development
conditions) on the
amended, or granting with s of the local .06,
Chapter 380
within 30 day
Order (an order grantingg denying,
ion for Development Approval
Applicat
subject
DR public hearing date.
f Fact and ncluslons of
a Findi go.1 u.
must include nn���
The Development order mi
h
Law regarding the extent to which: hievement of the
as with the ac
11(a) The development unreasonably interferes licable to
land development plan app
objectives of an adopted state
the area;
local land development
consistent with the
development is cons
(b) The
regulations; and
d recommendations
(c) The development is consistent with the report an
of the regional planning agency." to Chapter 380*069 the
t amendments
avert as required by recen
Moreoi
Development Order:
85-72
el
The Honorable Maurice Ferre
. Page 2
January B, 1985
,- �� specify the monitoring procedures and the local official
1. Shams sp Y pm Iiance with the
res risible for assuringthe development's s comp
development order.
P`
2. May establish expiration dates for the development ocom lianceudinwith
a deadline for commencing physical development, for comp
conditions of approval or phasing requirements, and for termination
of the order.
�u.
3. Shall specify the requirements for the annual report designated
(16) (Chapter 380•06 Florida Statutes amended),
under subsection parties to whom the report is
including the date of submission, p n the rules adopted
submitted, and contents of h ency�.t, based upo
by the state land p 9
4. May specify the types of changes to tdetial vaation determhnati oaunder
subsectirequire
onbmission for a(17)(a) (Chapterbsta380r.06, Florida Statutes amended).
ro ."
' 5. Shall include a legal description of the p pert Y
project must Copies of any developmeO�thrFeoridaissue
RegwonalrPlanning Council and the
be transmitted to the S
Florida Department of Community Affairs fort thheiroueVdevelopmenttorde�ry
Bred b receipt i p
your
45 day appeal period is triggered Y
Y p period, the Council will determine whether the City's
During this Pe
development order is consistent with the Council's report and
recommendations.
I ease call.
If we can be of further assistance, p
Si rely,
F
r r, Barry eterson, AICP
u# Executiv Director
MBP /km
Enclosure
cc: Joe McManus
Manuel Medina
Willy Bermello
Leonard Elzie
Susan Coughanour
Barbara Matthews
Alan Gold, Esq.
David Plummer
Herb Zebuth
Luann Rains
Bert Martinez
Chester Czebrinski
85-'72;
S
h
rj\
Stk
g,
R
t°' h
k
--
r 1
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
ASSESSMENT
FOR
CENTRE MIXED -USE DEVELOPMENT
TERREMARK
„1
Located in Miami, Dade County
23.19
SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL
January 7, 1985
85--72;
Wx
TABLE OF CONTENTS
....
LIST OF FIGURE ...................................................
S
LIStOF TABLES........................................................
PART 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....... 0.6'.0• " " " "
A. APPLICANT INFORMATION ..................................
Be PROJECT INFORMATION ....................................
PART II. PROJECT IMPACTS AND ISSUES — .........• " .... ..
A. ENVIROWENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES ......................
Be ECONOMY ................................................
C. PUBLIC FACILITIES ............ .•.•••.of" " ••••••••••••
D. TRANSPORTATION .........................................
PART III. SLt IMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS .... 0.0•••......... ••••••••'••
i
it
1
2
2
2
15
15
38
42
47
73
85-72;
5 h W
1{yAl,
4
T �
IS
t�� , awvtia
LIST OF FIGURES
w Title
Figure No.
3
..
Location Map .......................................... .
4
2 Existing Site ............................................
6
3 Project Cross Section ......••Osseo•••••..Osseo
8
Osseo
Site Access and Egress Locations
4 11
........
Pro sed Zoning............0.....................
5 p°
6 Traffic Impact Area ...................................... 48
T Existing Traffic Conditions 50
V.
....... 53
8 Programmed and Planned Roadway improvements .......
54
9 1g8� Background Traffic Conditions
'
56
d Development Location.......................
10 committed Map
Future Traffic Conditions (Witnout Project) •••••••••••• " 57
2
11
Future Traffic Conditions (Witn Project) 60
t
p�
12
, 13 Aviation Avenue and Intersection Improvements ............ 6
a
T 66
Recommended Improvements: SW 27tn Ave./Tigertaii Ave. ....
14
Development Susceptibility .••••••••••• " " " "
15 -
65-72;
too,* �.
LIST OF TABLES
Page
Table No.
Title
1
Proposed Development Component ..............................
5
2
Maximum Development with Existing Zoning ..••••••••••••'••'•'
9
3
Estimated Runoff Pollutant Loads ............................
23
of Potential Hazardous Waste Generators by SIC Code ....
26
4
List
5
Code for Waste Types Commonly Associated with each
31
SICCode ..................................................
6
Recommended Plant Species
34
7
Construction Costs ..........................................
38
gPermanent
Employment Impacts ................................
40
9
Fiscal Impact ...............................................
41
10
Projected On -Site Energy Use at Buiidou. ....................
43
11
Existing Traffic Conditions: Road Segments Operating Below
49
LOS"C.. ...................................................
52
12
Programmed Roadway Improvements .............................
Traffic Impacts: Critical Intersections ............
61
13
Project
Fair Share of Programmed Roadway Improvements .....
64
14
Applicant
Applicant Fair Share of Recommended Roadway Improvements ....
68
15
85-'72;
E
F
INTRODUCTION
This assessment of the proposed Terremark Centre mixed -use development
has been prepared by the South Florida Regional Planning Oouncti, as
d water Management Act for
required by the Florida Environmental land an
all Developments of Regional Impact.
The assessment is based on information supplied by the Applicant, by
Miami and Dade County staff, official plans, consultants, and field
inspections. Additional research relative to specific issues was
conducted by Council staff where needed.
rov Tde an
in accordance with the Act, this assessment is intended to p result from the
overview of the positive and negative impacts likely
proposal. The recommendations are intended to assist the City Commission
in reaching a decision on the proposed development through consideration
of regional, as well as local, impacts and issues. They do not abridge
the legal responsibility of local government to act pursuant to
applicable local laws or ordinances.
Copies of any "development order" tan order granting, denying, or
granting witn conditions an application for a development permit) issued
with regard to this project should be transmitted to the South Florida
Regional Planning Council and the Florida Department of Community
Affairs.
85_72;
i
V
A
fi X4
-`.
SCF3
�;Qj�,,a'}(' Y Ck4 w.W ri L
L-•,i„i.:va 4 .3
F
_..� . -
1}, C Rr� �•.
,. ._. _6'. .. ..l ..3 -_e�. � �i �k
9h