HomeMy WebLinkAboutO-09953LIN. F,�'
-1"
A7
� :kf ' T 1 -, !, '.'A I
IN OKPINANCE A0.00 NG THK IL '0 1011
N%W"'
NO. 95UO, THE ZONING ORUYNANCr nF THV CrTV
01:
MIAMI, VW)P IDA, FV Y Q! hN 1 1 NG A it T I Ch
V 1 -1
S FlOC I in h P103L T C f to
1 4 it E S T
I I-- I (' I i I C 1! (, W ..
v P4 T rT I. in n 1 7 S U T 11 B A y 5; H f 1 to L
1) F r V E,
C) V V�,' �RLAY i,) F ST R I C'T it'' 0 I\ 0 T
1
SECTIONS 15 17 1 TH RU 15 1 7 3 P ROV 110 1 NG 44)
INTENT, K F FECT AND C LASS C :5 PEC I AL
11 ERM IT
,
REQUIREMENT; A N D COTWFA I N I NG A R E
P FA [At N
PROVISION AND A ShVERABILITY CLAUSE.
WHEREAS, the Miami Planninq Advisory Board at its meeting cat.
January 2, 1985, jtc'111 1, ful lowing ar) advertised hearing,
adopted Resolot ion No. PAB 1-b5, by a 6 t() () vOte
APPROVAL, of Amending OrdinanCe No. 9500, as amended, as herein -
al ter set forth; and
WHEREAS, the City Coaunission, after the consideration of
this matter, oeems it advisable and in the 11best interest of the
general welfare of the CITY OF MIAMI and its inhabitants to qrant
these amendments, as hereinaCter set forth;
NOW, THUREPORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The text of Ordinance No. 9500, the Zoninq
Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, is hereby amended by
adding new sections to Article 15 of said Ordinance as follows:
"hRTICLE 15. SPI: SPECIAL PUBLIC INTEREST DISTRICTS
SECTION 15150. :API-15 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST
OVERLAY DISTRICT.
SECTION 15170. SPI-17: SOUTH BAYSBORI,-, DRIVE
OVERLAY DISTRICT.
SECTION 15171. INTENT
Along the coastal Atlantic ridge parallelinq Sooth
Bayshore Drive and overlooking Dinner Key and the
marina basin in Coconut Grove is an area of special and
substantial public interest because of unique property
sizes and shapes; geologic feature;; bay views and
vistas; relationships to major entrance roadways;
proximity to adjacent neighborhood, and public open
space and recreation, and commercial services; impacts
on surface parking on open space within Dinner. Key; and
a special character imparteu by tropical vegetation ancJ
historic structures.
C) t i i T-
w"rk 1 It Wns arn ;lt 'MIN :i t liq 1 V t
V" by pri)V imi i 1PI h- 1qh 1: 1 1 vita, 7P-H,31
l f"_.k ind i '?'o7 i":� r 1: l0c) r 1:;41 lit "-Mp _
a V r (? M 011
(:IS, avail 17`iry Iverf, kno Lor Dinner 1vit ies,
and lesion rpview quKelVeS.
SECTION 15172. EFFECT (An Sp 1- 17 DISTRICT LKSTGNA-
T h c e f L e, c t (�.) f these � I)f reolvil,at No= shalL be to
Modify regulations within portions of tho exist inq
district indicate(r in the ("ift iCial "',!) r-1 i, lig Ptl a :; _i!w
within its boundaries to tile E!xtcnt i.nciicated her-o?irl
for the SPI:-district. ModitLcations are 11stV hPlOw.
15172. 1 LIMITATIONS N USES - TRANSITIQNA[:
BUFFER.
For t 11 o s e p (D r t i o 11s t s a I) u t t i
right-ot-way that separates d ifterent zoning d i str Lctr,
the following use limitations shall apply:
(a) For the first 100 Feet of lot depth adjacent
to Tigertail Avenue there s1hall be a land-
scaped yard area, except that residential
uses, excluding hotels and motels, that front
on Tigertail Avenue may be developed in
accordance with other provisions of th is
district. Provided that residential develop-
ment occurs, ancillary and parking structures
for non-residential uses no greater in height
than the residential structures m a y tie
located below grade to within twenty (20)
feet of Tigertail Avenue or above grade
within (50) feet of Tigertail Avenue, provide
further that such ancillary or parking
structures are completely screened from view
along rigertail. Avenue by the residential
structures.
(b) For tile tirst fifty (50) feet of lot depth
adjacent to Mary Street, there shall be a
landscaped yard area, except that for
development which qualify under provisions of
Section 2003.7 of this ordinance, principle
use structures may be set back not less than
ten (10) feet from Mary Street provided that.
ground level convenience retail uses front on
not less than 65 percent of the Mary Street
frontage.
15172.2 EXCEPTIONS TO FLOOR AREA RATIO
LIMITATIONS,
twotwithstand ing floor area ratio limitations of
existing districts lying within the SPI-17 district
boundaries, the floor area ration may be increased in
accordance with the following provisions:
7777777
V,
i r v a -
mot k T"eno I olulatt-nA arn i v! nw,0 V al p!
h Wh dons i tv mixod-uny A-Val"rm-nn lu�n 1houp i (:. 1
i oil nq K& My 1 i n nFn:
a 1 i 11
qatinick and vjea cl)rr Anr r"q" i r- iyniL trann i V
jona",
r t-�'j Q i r e m v n t PineY W-s K! orivii
1",
sivailabln parkinq For Dinnpr Koy arKNOW,
arpi jPqj,jjj r-viow quidelinQs.
SECTWN 15112. E F F ECT 00' S P F - 17 D ISTRI CT DKS
FGNA--
TION,
The eftect of these SP f roy u I a t Wns ;'ha 1 1
be t
mcd i f y rt�qul ations wi thin jn)rt ions of tho exist
ins:,
district indicated i. n tin e, (, t-.' f i c i , I I Ciiilq 1
a s
within its boundar NF; to tilt, OXtent 'he
rr'
for the SPI-district. Modivications ar- listed hQ10w.
L. I M IT A T I ONS ON USES - TRANSITIONAL,
BUFFER.
F o t r i - i, (,-) r i , ; of I u t s ah u t t i nq publ i c
right-nf-way that separates d i fferent zoninq a i s tr i cts
the following use limitations shall apply:
(
Leet of lot (.i�,pth adjacent a) For the first 100
to Tigertail Avenue there sliall be a land-
scaped yard area, except that residential.
uses, excluoing hotels and motels, that front
on Tigertail Avenue may be developed i 11
accordance with other provisions of this
district. Provided that residential develop-
ment occurs, ancillary and parking structures
for non-residential uses no greater in height
than the residential s t r u c t u r es may 13 e
located below grade to w i th in twenty ( 20 )
feet of Tigertail Avenue or above (grade
within (50) feet of Tigertail Avenue, provide
further that such ancillary or parking
structures are completely screened from view
along Tigertail Avenue by the res ident ia I
structures.
(b) For the first fifty (,310) feet of lot depth
adjacent to Mary Street, there shall be a
landscaped yard area, except tilat for
development which qualify under provisions of
Section 2003.7 of this ordinance, principle
use structures may be set back not less than
ten (10) feet from Mary Street provided that
ground level convenience retail uses front on
not less than 65 percent of the Mary Street
frontaae.
15172.2 EXCEPTIONS TO FLOOR AREA RATIO
LIMITATIONS.
1,4otwithstanding floor area ratio limitation!; of
exi,sting districts lying within th(_! C;j-11-17 district
boundaries, the floor area ration may be increased in
accordance with the following provisions:
9953
SU"! LUN I t -7 3 IC; i, S i k C 1 A 1 ., P 3 C.
1. 'i 1 73. 1 , ill h , _ 11 ',t =, ' I u I r "d .
N o 1.) u i 1. 1 i T
1
e r TI J, t S I -A f" d
- :1
Wit:.
rl
00 U n(I *-I r.- i t In e.
:'�I - 17 1 1 i t
hulk, 1. r) c a t
r X t c� r c 1.1 r
n
X i s t i Il cI S 1: 1: u C t u r e t 11 f? ctar1.tt_:+tcrl
W
s r u c t u t: e or the
1. c) c a t. n I- t.- n ca t_ J, i: 'I r
rl 1 -.1 17 (1 e 1 'i, n
,
(D V eh i C u 1. a r w ay s
J
(-) r p e. r1k, j n '_i a r o ,l s o n ' a
t e
without authorization
lov Clay:; C
15 17 3 . 2 M a t e r i a 1. !' t () 6 e :"3 u bm i W i t"I
No h 1-1 rl i-I j. ,3 F, i . i w i t ii i n t 11--i e
?
u n, I a r i e F, f the S P I - 17 t t a If Q c t i n I t i (� S C i Jl 1.
a r,I s tlere,in r e q u i r c7i y a il n , r n c Lion,
I tf-- r 3 t ion or e n I aro efren t: vr�'h i c u 1. ar ways, t ru
or Parkin'j areas on ptl-ivz.lt,'_(� property with'out.
tion hV a Cla","'s C s_)tcial jr)(_'rmit.
15 1 ? 3 2' R (--' la t i o n of. Proposed Improvements
T_(3 Natural Features, Surrounding
Buildings, Ti-b—lic Recreation Areas,
and Major. Streets.
Proposed i illp r (D v e me tit s shall be related
harmoniously to the terrain, and in particular shall
protect and enhance natural features such as rock
outcroppings and ridge line.,, as much as reasonably
possible. Relationship of ri e w or redeveloped
structures shall consider open space and view corridor
relationships created by buildings, walls, landscaping,
and physical/visual linkages to public recreation
areas. Vehicular egress, from private drives servinq
non-residential structures or parking shall not occur
directly onto I'Lgertail Avenue.
151-73.2.2. Landscaping, Screening and Open
Space.
Desirable landscaping shall be preserved in its
natural state to tile maximum extent reasonably
feasible. General landscaping requirements and
standards established by this ordinance for (.,)ffstr(--et
parking, yards, and open space shall be considered
supple -mental try retention of desirable natural
features. Placement of structures and vehicular areas
be such as to retain, to the extent reasonably
practical, desirable existing landscaping, open spaces
and natural features, and to prnmote provisions of
compatible new landscapin(j. Desirable native plant
materials, and such exotic plant matrerials as have
become traditional in th(_--� area, shall. be preferred in
plant selection. All accessory areas and structures,
such a-
, r3crvice_ anci loading areas, which need scr�etling
to avoid advcrse effects on adjoininy proper 11-1 les shall.
be ade-quately concealed by appropriate plantings or
other screening."
Section 2. . Al I ordinances, c () d e s e C t. i C) n s , or 1,-)arts,
-4-
g".
UP7,F77
1 z
11 va cl I c? 'I fll r, �3 I c ',t r)
1
i-i w h e
D ('-)N FIRST Rl--',ADlNG b"l, TITf-,F" WJT,`
PASSED ON SL'COND AND 111 N A I, RE r� F, I T',lG BY TITI,h ON LY t A i t!
day of January. 1985.
Maur i- c e A. Pent r
KNJU FERRE , 'm a v 0 r
-44,TTE S T
'(;I E
ON RALPH G.
City Clerk
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
U09L E. MAXWELL'
',A.Vsistant City.,Attorney
APPROVED AS/'rO--FIDRM PVND CORRECTNESS:
LUCIA A. DOUGHERTY
City Attorney
JEM/Wpc/pb/374
1tilt0''
99 5 3
�tw vwn-r � �W-W-A �W, VIM -lip
City Klnt .
qtt: hylvig
Joel 4. maxwpll
hssintanL CUY Attnroy-,.7
As per y,:.)ur request, I have prepared new duplicate originals of
the following Legislation: J-85-48, j-895-49, J-85-50, anti
J-65-51.
new Legislation was prepared in response to your statement
Lhat your office has been unable to locate the originals prepared
earlier. They are exact duplicates in every respect and have not
been changed in any way.
JEN/wpc/ab/383
AttachAnUs
cc: Aurelio Perez-Lugonis, Director
Manning & Zoning Boards Administration
:17Y CF ` IAMI. Fl-CRIDA
AEMCRANDUM
r
Randolph Rosencrantz 3AT January 7, 1985 FILE
! City.,Manager
y -- ,;,a.;E,: ORDINANCE - RECOvIMEND APPROVAL
% TEXT AMENDMENT
ART 15 ADDING SECTIONS 15170 THROUGH
u r ryi 10 e u'ap'b & 15173
ACM s +�i aErERENCEs lla.-
D i'rec -.yy—
Planning and Zoning Boards COMMISSION AGENDA - JANUARY 24, 1985
Administration Department -""O' R`5 PLANNING AND ZONING ITEMS
It is recommended by the Planning
Advisory Board that amendments to -_
the text of Zoning Ordinance 7500,
as amended, by amending Article 15
SPI Special Public Interest
Districts by adding Sections 15170
SPI-17: South Bayshore Drive
Overlay District; 15171 Intent;
15172 Effect of SPI-17 District
Designation; and 15173 Class C
Special Permit be approved, as
amended.
The Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of January 2, 1985, Item 1,
following an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution PAB 1-85 by a b to 0
vote, recommending approval, as amended, of amendments to the text of Zoning
Ordinance 9500, as amended, by amending Article 15 SPI Special Public
Interest Districts by adding Sections 15170 SPI-17: South Bayshore Drive
Overlay District; 15171 Intent; 15172 Effect of SPI-17 District Designation;
and 15173 Class C Special Permit and by changing the word "or" to "and" in
the proposed Section 15172.2.1, paragraph "a", so that it reads,
" ..accessibility by the general public during normal business and operating
hours of public activities..."
Twenty-six objections received in the mail; nineteen opponents present at the
meeting. Three responses in favor received in the mail; sixteen proponents
present at the meeting.
Backup information is included for your review.
An ORDINANCE to provide for the above has been prepared by the City Attorney's
Office and submitted for consideration of the City Commission.
AEPL:111
cc: Law Department
NOTE; Planning Department recormends: APPROVAL
tr
CITY OF MIAMI. FLORIDA
;NT£R•OFF1C'E 'AEMORANQUM51
� • ,,. ' (•.
Randolph Rosencrantz 0-ATE December 20, 1984
Ci -,Manager
SUBJECT ORDINANCE - TEXT AMENDMENT
ART 15 ADDING SECTIONS 15170 THROUGH
& 15173
es
Director RF:FERENGES COMMISSION AGENDA - JANUARY 10, 1985
Planning and Zoning Boards PLANNING AND ZONING ITEMS
Administration Department ENCLOSURES
It is recommended by the Planning
Department that amendments to the
text of Zoning Ordinance 9500, as =
amended, by amending Article 15
SPI Special Public Interest
Districts by adding Sections 15170
SPI-17: South Bayshore Drive
Overlay District; 15171 Intent;
15172 Effect of SPI-17 District
Designation; and 15173 Class C
Special Permit be approved.
The Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of January 2, 1985, will consider
amendments to the text of Zoning Ordinance 9500, as amended, by amending
Article 15 SPI Special Public Interest Districts by adding Sections 15170
SPI-17: South Bayshore Drive Overlay District; 15171 Intent; 15172 Effect of
SPI-17 District Designation; and 15173 Class C Special Permit. The
recommendations of the Planning Advisory Board will be presented at the City
Commission meeting.
Backup information is included for your review.
An ORDINANCE to provide for the above has been prepared by the City Attorney's
Office and submitted for consideration of the City Commission.
AEPL:111
cc: Law Department
NOTE: Planning Department recommends: APPROVAL
;'?"�i/+LAP!4{'�"^,+!",.��;P`k'�`,.'*e:'�,>.L:t9.�:�Vy"eMkdd4t,'3[+,+A?-2v.9.2::.+.,v,".:tii"'.Y"s!K`^'ls"�,rv:: «e,)-,7F.aY,<•r.r-:�1wf.L'��4°y>.f`,b-"A�aC':�.�"'..�i-'L..._ .. Y "."% �'r3n;Giq.q. .
PLANNING FACT SHEET - ---�
APPLICANT
City of Miami Planning Department:
November 29, 1984
PETITION
1. Consideration of amending Zoning Ordinance 9500,
as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of
Miami by amending ARTICLE 15: SPI SPECIAL PUBLIC -
INTEREST DISTRICTS by adding new Sections
15170., SPI-17: SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE OVERLAY
DISTRICT: 15171. Intent; 15172. Effect of SPI-
17 District Designation; 15173. Class C Special =_
Permit.
REQUEST
To add a SPI 17: SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE OVERLAY
y
DISTRICT.
— BACKGROUND
Commission policy toward re -zoning requests in
this area, development pressures, and the
passage of time since the approval of the
Coconut Grove Master Plan have suggested a re --
study of proper and appropriate land development
—'
controls in this area. The Bayshore Drive
Development Study recommended the SPI-17
-
District, as a result.
ANALYSIS
w
SPI-17: South Bayshore Drive Overlay District,
require a Class C special permit for all new
development in the area. This proposed zoning
_
district would have the following effects in the
-
underlying KO-3 District:
a. No change in the base land use or floor
area ratio is recommended. The current
FAR is 1.21 for all developments.
b. Provide floor area bonuses (up to .50
_
FAR) to those projects that provide a
—
substantial number of parking spaces to
be used by the public.
c. Establish 22 story height limit (a 250
ft. height) for all projects and reserve
first 100 Feet of lot depth from
southside of Tigertail for moderately
-scaled townhouse development with a 45
height limit, and ancillary support - --
structures.
d. Townhouse development is required within
_
100' of Tigertail Avenue, accompanied by
other development.
-
PAS 1/2/85
Item #1
Page I-
ae4.t- Wwv...��_"'xK�:7 �.• '0i - Y
REC01MIMENDATIONS
PLANNING KEPT. Approval
PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD Continued from meeting of December 19, 1984
At its meeting of January 2, 1985, the Planning
Advisory Board adopted Resolution PAB 1-85
by a 6 to 0 vote, recommending approval, as amended,
of the above and by changing the wording in the
proposed Section 15172.2.1, paragraph "a", so that
it reads, "...accessibility by the general
public during normal business and operating
hours of public activities..."
CITY CO3•1MISSION At its meeting of January 10, 1985, the City
Commission passed the above on First Reading. -
PA8 1/2/85
Item #1
Page 2
i�
_. ... .� .. � � .�..... .. .. � .. -. ,. r. �.�a ..�M,f.l..l:�.a....y r. wv, r�...,v.'wh:�:w. �.•.._ . .. .. ., .. .a... ..
� 1
SECTION 15170. SPI-17 SOUTH BAYSHORE OVERLAY DISTRICT' �•�-
SECTION 15171. INTENT
Along the coastal Atlantic ridge paralleling South Bayshore
Drive and overlooking Dinner Key and the marina basin in Coconut
Grove is an area of special and substantial public interest
because of unique property sizes and shapes; geologic features;
bay views and vistas; relationships to major entrance roadways;
proximity to adjacent neighborhoods, and public open space and
recreation, and commercial services; impacts on surface parking
on open space within Dinner Key; and a special character imparted
j by tropical vegetation and historic structures.
It is the intent of these special public interest district
regulations that future public and private development shall
—3 - respect and enhance this character, preserving area -wide property
values and enhancing Coconut Grove's desirability as a place to
live and work. These regulations are intended to apply to the
high density mixed -use development area abutting South Bayshore
_ Drive by providing height limits, special setback and view
corridor requirements, transitional use and design requirements,
incentives to provide publicly available parking for Dinner Key
activities, and design review guidelines.
SECTION 15172. EFFECT OF SPI-17 DISTRICT DESIGNATION.
The effect of these SPI regulations shall be to modify
regulations within portions of the existing district indicated in
the Official Zoning Atlas as within its boundaries to the extent
indicated herein for the SPI-district. Modifications are listed
below.
SECTION 15172.1. LIMITATIONS ON USES - TRANSITIONAL BUFFER.
For those portions of lots abutting public right-of-way that
separates different zoning districts the following use
limitations shall apply:
(a), For the first 100 feet of lot depth adjacent to
Tigertail Avenue there shall be a landscaped yard area
except that residential uses, excluding hotels and
motels, that front on Tigertail Avenue may be developed
in accordance with other provisions of this district.
Provided that residential development occurs, ancillary
and parking structures for non-residential uses no
greater in height than the residential structures may be
located below grade to within twenty (20) feet of
Tigertail Avenue or above grade within (50) feet of
Tigertail Avenue, provided further than such ancillary
or parking structures are completely screened -from view
along Tigertail Avenue by the residential structures.
q
4�,+4/�i'i��l:•i.:�W Wu4?.V),50& 14"".
i
•y
(b) For the first fifty feet of lot depth adjacent to Mary
Street, there shall be a landscaped yard area except
that for developments which qualify under provisions of
Section 2003.7 of this ordinance, principle use
structures may be set back not less than ten (10) feet
from Mary Street provided that ground level convenience
retail uses front on not less than 65 percent of the
Mary Street frontage.
SECTION 15172.2. EXCEPTIONS TO FLOOR AREA RATIO LIMITATIONS.
Notwithstanding floor area ratio limitations of existing
districts lying within the SPI-17 boundaries, the floor area
ratio may be increased in accordance with the following
provisions:
SECTION 15172.2.1 Publiclv Accessible Parkin
_ For every non-residential parking space provided in excess of
offstreet parking requirements, an additional two hundred (200)
square feet of floor area for any use shall be permitted,
l provided however:
(a) Such parking space shall be not less than one hundred
(100) spaces and accessible by the general public during
normal business or operating hours of public activities
or attractions in Dinner Key or adjacent public
facilities.
(b) Parking fees charged shall not be in excess of
prevailing rates for public metered parking in the
vicinity, as established by the Miami Department of Off -
Street Parking.
(e) The entrance to the excess parking facility shall not be
farther than six hundred (600) feet from the main
entrance of a structure housing a major public activity,
such as a performance hall, specialty center, exhibition
center or conference facility.
(d)' In no case shall the cumulative additional floor area
permitted under this section exceed .50 times gross lot
area.
SECTION 1517E-2.2. Transitional Buffer - Residential.
Residential uses (excluding hotel use) may be permitted
Within the limitations of the land use intensity sector 4 only
for that portion of the lot within one hundred (100) feet of the
zoned right-of-way line of Tigertail Avenue to establish a buffer
adjacent to high density non-residential uses. Floor area
permitted by this section shall be in addition to the maximum
allowable for other uses,
r_2a
" 5,3
W
.`�",'e'9Y'�hli'.taxf1i:'�•N�'�`�f•�'�j�.�'"Y.y'1I4�i}e6�i+F'#k�-�'fiWh%=t!:a*v't.S'•�x[I►i7++t,1{�f�:�'"�"+Wn'.%ca3Ss1?'� ... .._ r-. ., .tS ..1... -
y
�j L •y
,' { i�i. i,. is � � a � 8 C ::. :, � 2 it G�'c • Y
`L i
(b) For the first fifty feet of lot depth adjacent to Mary
Street, there shall be a landscaped yard area except
that for developments which qualify under provisions of
Section 2003.7 of this ordinance, principle use —
structures may be set back not less than ten (10) feet
from Mary Street provided that ground level convenience
retail uses front on not less than 65 percent of the f
Mary Street frontage.
SECTION 15172.2. EXCEPTIONS TO FLOOR AREA RATIO LIMITATIONS.
Notwithstanding floor area ratio limitations of existing
districts lying within the SPI-17 boundaries, the floor area
ratio may be increased in accordance with the following
provisions: -
_f
SECTION 15172.2.1 Publicly Accessible Parking.
For every non-residential parking space provided in excess of
offstreet parking requirements, an additional two hundred (200)
—� square feet of floor area for any use shall be permitted,
€ provided however:
(a) Such parking space shall be not less than one hundred
(100) spaces and accessible by the general public during
normal business or operating hours of public activities
or attractions in Dinner Key or adjacent public
facilities.
(b) Parking fees charged shall not be in excess of
prevailing rates for public metered parking in the
vicinity, as established by the Miami Department of Off -
Street Parking.
(c) The entrance to the excess parking facility shall not be
farther than six hundred (600) feet from the main
entrance of a structure housing a major public activity,
such as a performance hall, specialty center, exhibition
center or conference facility.
(d)' In no case shall the cumulative additional floor area
permitted under this section exceed .50 times gross lot
area.
SECTION 15172.2.2. Transitional Buffer Residential.
Residential uses (excluding hotel use) may be permitted
within the limitations of the land use intensity sector 4 only
for that portion of the lot within one hundred (100) feet of the
zoned right-of-way line of Tigertail Avenue to establish a buffer
adjacent to high density non-residential uses, Floor area
permitted by this section shall be in addition to the maximum
allowable for other uses,
x
_ .. e24W
»^�
J-
r
woo my*
..:.0 _ ,� a 1...�.iC•a:>.w.LCti !' .inw�w s...:.l ... r ; r F ti✓..t., i ; ... .., �. ,......
•�i )>:. i �� .: �... •-'.j.Li„<.1,.y`;; "� '� ::�.'1'r'Y...wvr.r. . ,.y,':,: .
SECTION 15172.3. SPECIAL LIMITATIONS ON WALLS, VEHICULAR WAYS
AND PARKING IN A REQUIRED SPECIAL YARD.
There shall be provided an average yard area setback along
South Bayshore Drive of thirty (30) feet within which walls,
fences and hedges over three feet in height shall be prohibited.
No parking, except for passenger drop-off facilities shall be
permitted and vehicular drives shall not occupy more than twenty-
five (25) percent of the required special yard area.
SECTION 15172.4 SPECIAL HEIGHT LIMITS.
No building within this district shall exceed a height of two
hundred fifty (250) feet or twenty-two (22) stories in height
whichever is lower, and no building within 100 feet of the zoned
right-of-way of Tigertail Avenue shall exceed forty—five (45)
feet.
SECTION 15173. CLASS C PERMIT.
SECTION 15173r1. When Required.
No building permit shall be issued within the boundaries of
the SPI-17 affecting the height, bulk, location or exterior
configuration of any existing structure, the construction of any
new structure, or the location or relocation or enlargement of
vehicular ways or parking areas on private property, without
authorization by Class C special permit.
SECTION 15173.2. Materials to beSubmittedwith applications.
No building permit shall be issued within the boundaries of
the SPI-17 district affecting the special yards herein required
by the location, relocation, alteration or enlargement of
vehicular ways, structures or parking areas on private property
without authorization by a Class C special permit.
SECTION 15173.2.1. Relation of Proposed Improvements to Natural
Features, Surrounding Buildings, Public
Recreation Areas, and jor Streets.
Proposed improvements shall be related harmoniously to the
terrain, and in particular shall protect and enhance natural
features such as rock outcroppings and ridge lines as much as
reasonably possible. Relationship of new or redeveloped
structures shall consider open space and view corridor
relationships created by buildings, walls, landscaping, and
physical/visual linkages to public recreation areas. Vehicular
egress from private drives serving non-residential structures or
parking shall not occur directly onto Tigertail Avenue,
i
... f
} �f,2W:..i•+..ri�►yd � :r t.C'fv �.. ,.,�.� •..� "t
. .. .-. µ�•iuc
„r' �-n'4:af +..�.ti:..�� n_" .... aLr:�
..
,.h
.. .. ... .. ...:J•.i•`.►+.+�. '....t�N{.r-::.c...•:�:�: � i:� ,. t ,� .. ........ '.!�.,Jr.�a �,�.. •+ki::::5t`h��! k'fy'ULd4fi�.!r'..�ils�:µ _..w.:� ltt.. w.=a�+ ..:ice_...... :.., �^."+
:ii:..,}.3L� .�a.,Lt,..4
SECTION 15173.2.2. Landscaping, Screening
and Open
Space.
Desirable landscaping shall be preserved in its natural state
to the maximum extent reasonably feasible. General landscaping
requirements and standards established by this ordinance for
offstreet parking, yards, and open space shall be considered
supplemental to retention of desirable natural features.
Placement of structures and vehicular areas shall be such as to
retain, to the extent reasonably practical, desirable existing
landscaping, open spaces and natural features, and to promote
previsions of compatible new landscaping. Desirable native plant
materials, and such exoticplant materials as have become
traditional in the area, shall be preferred in plant selection.
All accessory areas and structures, such as service and loading
areas, which need screening to avoid adverse effects on adjoining
properties shall be adequately concealed by appropriate plantings
or other screening.
5
{r
R
WE IVE UNMRSIGNM BELIM THAT
THERE SHOULD BE NO INOREAS
IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH BAYSHOR5 DRIV5 AND OTHER THOROUGHFArm IN
COCONUT GROVE
namO.Printed namcsigned address ph► number
.-75-t-
cli ell
99 5 3
THE ASSOCIATION
3100 JEFFERSON STREET =00NUT GROVE 858-2477
WE IT 'E UNDERSIGNED 101WEr. T14AT
THERE SHOULD BE NO INCREASE
IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH SAYSHORE DRIVE AND OTHER THOROUGHrARSS IN
COCONUT GROVE
namo:printod addroas
5011
co e
gum
pht number
WE Mit UNDERSIGNED 89LI11P. THAT
THERE SHOULD BE NOINCREA8EI
IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE AND OTHER THOROUGHFARES IN
namweigned address
CV
L k)i' A �5
-tee*
phi, number.
Su YJ L�
P, 6-7 3 o7o
PETITION TO THE CITY CO
ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS SHEET
vily-Twom
WE IPME UNDERSIGNED IBELI*12 THAT
THERE SHOULD B N INC EASE
IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH BAYSHOR9 DRIVE AND OTHER THOROUGHFARES IN
COCONUT GROVE
name printed namemigned address pK number
- ------- --
U - 0
7-
cqQ� ct
S74s
z,2
T/w
2, q
r f
c4-0-
6D 6
14
THE
3 100 JEFFERSON STREET COCONUT
6V6 -,6 Y y
�_CEI � V(K
WE VE UNDERSIGNED 11MLIttlE THAT
THERE SHOULD BE NO INCREASE
IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE AND OTHER THOROUGHFARES IN
COCONUT GROVE
matt ewinted marne:91oned address ph, number
14
"I
ASSOCIATION
3100 JEFFERSON STREET 0090W I omvvc 45011 *f If,
3100 JEFFERSON STREET 0090W I omvvc 45011 *f If,
go
ATTENTION
IF YOU LIVE IN THE CITY OF MIAMI
PLEASS AgAD AND SIGN THE
ION TO THE CITY
ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS SH15ET �gdvP_.
qn r --'
: C
cc, q `% 7 7 707
j a ti, L Gvv
f
Qs(-:, -tea - el
VU.NC AQ MGt-AUC, Fk) YmuAkcoa VvlC�ftt� tJ �Lj-U— , `yak S+ a S 3 r 7b
ffa"Y'yq
N el-,, Ql
-wCR, i
� i C-k c`1'1�.-'1 l�
7
Z�
Nf4c
F
HIC.
UP
I
Lho tio d(Igned NO INCREASI, OP DENSITY
alt-
p 1)1.-Ivr. on(I oLhcJ- Lhotoki-Cl11fares :in
A d cl r vss Illolle bUmber,
-Y2
(cld
64,C111cr-L )
H r '/A >I'E- 71 eie,
.jq /�L. /,A qg S,,
7 S yam- -710
'71
Al IY j 9
IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH 13AYSHORE DRIVE AND OTHER THOROUGHFARES IN
0
namcprinted namomigned address
y �
, r7... . . .........
Z
h, numborl
�,�J,�� �� `> '"".,- � �- ��r'-t Gar
-7��� ,�L� C�
ASSOCIATION
3100 JEFFERSON STREET COGONUT GROVE 858-2477
:z t
IF YOU LIVE IN THE CITY OF MIAMI
PLEASE READ AND SIGN THF.
PETITION TO THE CITY COMM[
ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS SHEET
RAPHIC
Roup
=NG
NO NC.
9 9 5 3
welpHE uNmaiomzo eaLOVF. THAT
x I , ow �111111 I
IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH 13XYSHORE DRIVE AND OTHER THOROUGHFARES IN
COCONUT GROVE
name. -Printed name:sIgned address ph, number;.
14
cxj h j
17
c4e, (Y :201
A, Lpi N k1 C`/ c-tL
-7 S_ cc' S_Q
`�s� ��� y�� j
7 q 0<5 w �
Lo
9 Sv
'A 373 — V??�y
6, eV a. 6 s -
- Z_
Ao
t2
L4 t:
�2
WFWHe UNDeRSIGNED, 139*VE THAT
THERE SHOULD BE NO INCREASE
IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH BAY -SHORE DRIVE AND OTHER THOROUGHFARES IN
COCONUT GROVE
name:printed namemloned address ph, number
s -( 4� zaitimt rw
5-q,o ( -5 kj,g q &NZ
16 6, 8 1
rl GL�
A--
vi Qs
;44
4L:7�
P
Y,6
V -c S, owoox 4K cmw-r- 1
m 6 W-�( -
4
cr
co & �q - 2 ) 0 � :
ALONG SOUTH 13AYSHORE DRIVE AND OTHER THOROUGHFARES IN
COCONUT GROVE
name-6printed name.-signod address ph number
MWv
suStluN,c &'d-vrAIdA c)OaD TPAPP/�V�,
i
{
j �-
x
4
f
i
WePSHE UNDERSIGNED 139Lf,#VE THAT
THERE SHOULD BE Nth INCREASE
IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH BAY -SHORE DRIVE AND'OTHER THOROUGHFARES IN
COCONUT GROVE
namo:printed name:81oned address ph. number
71 c"
I
133c-
? 1-7 3
/:3 3 c>
7,5�
?
63 Z3
IN DENSITY
ALIMMA lq!nUTW l%AV.QWMt2M MMIUM AMM twitWOM TlJFll5^"ftkjCAftW-t IM
name:printed narnmoloned address
CJ
ALONG SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE AND OTHER THOROUGHFARES IN
COCONUT GROVE ��a�;,t ,�..
nartie:printed nafnaMigned
02u s
44
I Xa*, M�;
dl-
6-
A14
� _r,.7
ran
h► nuMbGr
/
7
5-d 31
2 ss-- la? o
gi-q- 79
- 79
1 4) . i 1 7 �6
�2-
r.4'
C�OLD
r.
ANN (A
6,
K rRve, te 'v,.
QP4 15
D
N T �o aAt-
lies,
KAJIQH TI
C)
ALONG SOUTH 13AYSHORE DRIVE AND OTHER THOROUGHFARES IN
COCONUT GROVE
name:printed namm.,sloned address ph, number.
CO
2320 -TeoPP
'2- 4 U G --Or OL
Co(o C-4 t
k7
1-v
rq� 3
ATTENTION 11
IF YOU LIVE IN THE CITY OF MIAMI
PLEASE READ AND SIGN THE
PETITION TQ THE CITY COMMISION
ON TH-8--REVERSE SIDE OF THIS SHEET
��� c
413(
W14
2
I
RAPHIC
ROUP
r N M N
TIN%, .INC,
-70
welrHE UNIDEASIGNED BE
At 0
�14-no a -2 1 ", loi p- i ;*,A�j
IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH SAYSHOR12 DFIIVI ANC OTN THOROUGHPARSS IN
COCONUT GROVE
name.,printed narno:sIgned address
M nP
owo
rf q 0 S 's, Uj 1cc,
7`4 t-, J- f, ') o -f
A ve-:-
lei
e 7
3 -, L o 0 L�.
Ott ���
v
pK numb -or .
S: YLAV) 6,115
-541-3
-�-�`T ; .e�z-�°�,�, ass- >i3s
5
41
quo.,
WMHE UNDIMASIGNED 139LMOTHAT
IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE AND OTHER THOROUGHFARES IN
COCONUT GROVE
namo:printed name signed --address numbor
o
NCO=, WG71
S- ts� Go i Oct
7-�
t
—" C��,es�wl�L�O l� °
4�1� 1613�5 SW
A &4w,�,e
le g
, Jywvif�'�,
All-
k s w b S�
A vl-;-- rs- � - S_ �/,
L/,3
y6-e-cl, S 7-3
y�7 - 9,6 72
9
,e5 91- �? 3-
c:QSS-,V3S_
35'o xq.3 A-
3 100 JEFFERSON STREET COCONUT GROVE 858-2477
PLEASE READ AND SIGN THE
TI(')N TO ?WE_CITY COMMISI0f
ON THE REVERSE SIDS OF THIS SHEET
= m
W10HE UNDERSIGNED- 89LIkE T14AT
IN III
- 7R
IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE AND OTHER THOROUOHPARES IN
COCONUT GROVE
name:printed nammaigned address phi number
�. vy, J i 3 3
ST �5
4 #EL 0 i-r= Lc:
QV, A;or=
CIAO
7'6e-v
2�? q
Aq A
, . -
% �� �-yam �. ,� .,
cj i-Am� �r '-4'* -\I C•\ Q te- I C-ocon vr AV-,Q— 'A
C) y-
f.
3
5r—V
99 5
THE ASSOCIATION" 3
$100 JEFFERSON STREET -OPCONUT GROVE $511-2477
i I
IF YOU LIVE IN THE CITY OF MIAMI
PLEASE READ AND SIGN THE
PETITION TO THE CITY COMMIS_I_ON
ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS SHEET
312
ex"
A3E
IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH BAYSWORE DRIVE AND OTHER THOROUGHFARES IN
COCONUT GRAVE
name:printed name:slpeed address phi number
.J/�
Jo L
- ry
39oq AUFA+(*olU -A,ulto
0
33/33
' A-v i#J�
�b cPL 3313
.3
/4VeM,
�rt3
�_ w
• Fpio 4 . _
32.0&F Cyr:
, s-787
THE ASSOCIATION
3100 JEFFERSON STREET COCONUT
ROVE 858- 477
�AT
THERE SHOULD BE NO INCREASE
IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH 13AYSHOR9 DRIVE AND OTH9R TH014OUGHFARES IN
COCONUT GROVE
namc,printed namo,,,sloned address pK number_,
33,r33
P/Aep OV,
.0.000NVT
ATTENTION 1!
IF YOU LIVE IN THE CITY OF MIAMI
PLEASE READ AND SIGN THE
PETITION -TO THE CITY COMMISION
ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS SHEET
1 6.1
19AYSHORE DRIVE ARIA bmLOPMENT
UDER NXTIM0 AND PROPOSID IONINC
(baaed on Planning Dept Information)
(figures in aqui a fe
et)
t
. ..... .... .
Existing
use Today
8xisting VPP
& Potential use
under Egisting
Zoning
Total U86
under proposed
Apt-17
Office (60%)
350,000
9610000
1t6500000
Residential (30%)
468,750
963?750
9280750
Retail
services (18%)
212,000
342,000
3421000
Total
1j,030j750
2,266,750
2r920r750
(over double)
(almost triple
Parking Spaces
Required
3100
5180
,R�a s...�....�...,t-,�.../• /ter/.rs
0
w
4)
o
•�•1
•H
to 01
0
dl
•H H
�•i
•H (�
0
O
M >
C
C
H
p1•H
^
1'1
C)
H
ro
•bj
m
CO Q1
O
tQ
N
OI LQ
4b
H
1q
^
L-1
G)
w
Co
N
O
4b
4b
v
v
'.
•t7
DC N
-
•N
N
rU
M
w
NOQ
0
0o
ti
O
,Q
y 0
=
C LQ
O
t�
O
t�
Co •N
W�
o
0
0
0
E
y 1O�
H
C N
Q
`+
M
a
.o
N
C
bh to Q 00
N
••
to
�mi CT+ ►Q C
O/
G/
w
N
D
N O 0
to
ea
4
eo
O
w
br
01
t1 t1 H C
ti
w
ti
m
H
ti
Q
H
•H Q) W
.
.
.
,
p
N
C (H
C C M
C
O 0
ay�y.
-
o
0
o
a
bh '
17
D Q N
•fl
12
o '
y
H
o
N
M Hru
Ca �
o
�
�
C
is
ru
+®
�•
ry
3.i
0
Q
',
r;
- � . � -. � .. .�, ; - - --.. a .: . _gym. :: _ _�...��_ .y-..�;.,.
LOW
3
7
ve
Wo flio A In do i
it It! no( I
ho I I o vo
It, m Iol I
)v
141AS11, OP IVINATTY
Mond 11iolith
Iloy!d1ort, llrivc and
othol. Illm-wi(jill,F11-61i
ill
O000lmt. On-ovo.
Add Iv.- I I I :
s-
Nonic., o I I I i,t t it I
AY
I/ V 5-0 tv I F
7V el.
:?
m
C,. LESLLY rvNGE;k
3 53 5- 3 313 3
t4 X& L) t-ICA
o e 33)33 "�SV-73tS
-,.5- /
e,�"r xd C, -6 4
57
13 G 0
7��y �-
t5 6)
t ls� a
s 0 1 "Ro
7
i Ll Fs-g - 3
talk j W .4 � y41
3moo C-*,q q trr.
6 3 3
�zZ
1975ys��
-
•
cz E-
LOW C*vtvht-- (j6lodva
We the uhdtrslqftod believe that there thbtld be 90 MdfttAgE OP bMfT�
aloh4 South 8ayghbte brivo and other thotouqhfArog ih Codbftft OkbVOS
Ramtt- printed A101CMA ? 6� 5 —(
slqnattto Ae-tu'-1- ?e -a-,f
,7-,/ Xt-2-7uc,"y
Phone number 2 Y Y,1
hA
UIZ� 12
30,
T le4 f -z L
8-2
C111-Yr—
C 6L) e-I 4. ll�
j4CLV%4et UU o*ui a-q to G-M-O-iuo- S`'t - r195g
31V g,,U,
O"rl c ypi M; 0 C., 4+1 rl
0
$LOW—G�'ovJTH 4'ov rt-he G✓ove,1
We the undersimied believe that there should b(- tl.,() Tw"' -r-,ASE or. OrNSTIVY
along South nayshore Orive And other thorougffat-es in (oc(.)nuL Grove.
Ykcldress t '57 5AIl
Name! printed F
Name: signature "jj:� Phone number: S 7 7
C,
r r_s
--s E
4 U M IF;v
, pu
r
cq-A�s )0
r4, L
JC2
e� 1, 7 a�vr¢
-ffe F Ocoi-,
;'�� Ti9e�'t�l
acl(=,y NA7-bovf.+ ST: 3SLf- 75'7y
z9(o� ����
1 7,
I WE TQ UNDERSIGNED BELIEV
THAT
THERE SHOULD BE NO INCREASE
IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH aAYSHORE DRIVE AND OTHER THOROUGHFARES IN
COCONUT GROVE
name.-MrInted namemloned address ph, number
We the undersigned beli ve that there should be NO INCREASE IN DENSITY
along South Bayshore Dre and other thoroughfares in Coconut Grove.
Name: Printed NaIC0, qd Address phone number
6
-
A,
8 r1) 7 5- 13
76
0j'T
<
D
S4�
Nr
3
2- r
THZ TIGBRTAIL A530CIATION
3100 Jefferson street, Coconut Grove.
858-2477
6 1
WETLI'lit.' UNDERSIGNED. 09LIEVETHAT
THERE SHOULD BE NC1 INCREASE
IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH SAYSHORE DRIVE AND OTHER THOROUGHFARES IN
COCONUT GROVE
name:printed name signed address phi, number
Y-7/37
3530
ccl
31
�A ipp T N
0 1 sw
\ry) -Z)
all 5o.
-7
A-17
cv
we T
WeRISIGNSO 132LIEV
0
AT
tal"ai
TNT,-
ki af�ilps- llll 7 Ill
'IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH SAYSHORE DRIVE AND OTHE14 THOROUGHFARES IN
M&Me:printed
COCONUT GROVE
namemigned address
oodC tko-e,_
�. s-o
W 0- r f p UU S l-, 7 6 r f 3 �
V'YtS
Y
V
:3 (Al tG tc at OW.
tA Sea/
-1 L
300r-� c-
LE-C-- 305� SIZD A'
,f�Ly CM17MM
THE
C
ph, number
py e - 0 L(,4 y
446 -- 0 0 Z 7
4-/ 54 '- 7-10 /
ASSOCIATION, 9 9 5 8
3100 JEFFERSON STREET COGONUT GROVE 85S--2477
VI-w1a tove
We the undersigned bel ieVe that there should bo NO twl�FASB OF t)VM;Tq'Y
Name! printed Address.,
Name! slqhaturo Phone number!
/A
0 TI Ll
F9 Z-IF-9
(4 T- ff- I PE 771 --5
9- 5-00 )S-1 C)
3
cm- � Y\,P, v4e-(� alc4kA
9 sa
Us"
Op-P-Pe r son S4, 95 -,-ZI 3 1
i d e 1-0u o r?
cF I'-- UL
%J
tjojoo
%U 1 I IUD C) t
6 � al-2
k
x Ll
0 C, ICL+/
-38 Ll
WE T rlfl vs UND9A3IQN9D SE'LiEvV�TMAT
THERE SHOULD BE No INCREASE
IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE AND OTHER THOROUGHFARES IN
COCONUT GROVE
name:printed namemloned address ph► numbor
_FM A en Ate-
St).SA,v,VF
Aua_�
ee-e-'
c' E bl,,A�a n.
-Lf I F � r- 'r
.5�?017 el
Lo
p
51�11- �Wjl
96?-/5O 1
��' � ���- �'� y� �� � �' .ter :� ! �� �'.5�,�'
2Z1&4, 175-o awvxapt-�" Rd Ml-am*
--v -2 C. a- IF
090
c, q
Aj
Z-5 t Ca td,
- / --? S7
IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH IBAYSHORE DRIV5 AND OTHER T40ROUGHPARES IN
J New
COCONUT GROVE
name:91ped address
A 1�pt
F.
-)GAA
C4 PWA6a (21,y--
��
Y
A(-c
Iry A
M
THE
phk number
W
(I- �-D Sao
ASSOCIATION#
6 73
-IF 7 2
1 9958
3 100 JEFFERSON STREEt COC I ONUT GROVE S58-2417
IF YOU LIVE IN THE CITY OF MIAMI
PLEASE READ AND SIGN THE
PETITION TO THE CITY COMMN
ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS SHEET
namweloned address
jz 6pot
h� numbor
.2 saj +- -,) c,, e /
3
I'll
rS 0 0
NIL ( Pto 4 V
�3ia C�.� leliW63
2 7&T
ems;, /Y/ 7S
lf 1 1, r-p-
- A,-IL&I I'J /N/6
WE THYUNDERSIGNED 13 ELIE V -41�114AT'
MW
THERE SHOULD BE NO INCREASE
� -' IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH BAYSHORS DRIVE AND OTHER THOROUGHFARES IN
jhz,-z50 Z(foe
fe-mr- y (ioEoec:-
5 CIL i� -�.�
THE
3140 JEFFERSON STREET COCONUT
Soh - dl S-4�-
yv� =fPVy
ASSOCIATION
GROVE 858"W2477
W9#49 UNDERSIGNED Bakii.ft THAT
------
THERE SHOULD BE 1 NO ' INCREASE
IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH BAYSHOFRE DRIVE AND OTHER THOROUGHFARES IN
COCONUT GROVE
name:printed namomIgned address ph. number
F-e. 33133
c
CoS-,PIC
e- Z-)
a
41�
ASSO CIATION 9 5 a
3100,.JEFFERS014. STREET COCONUT QROVE 8582477
WE THrUNDERSIGNED 8ELl9Vf%l4AT
THERE SHOULD BE NO INCREASE
IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH SAYSHORE DRIVE AND OTHER THOROUGHFARES IN
COCONUT GROVE
naime:printed name.,sIgned address phs number
,lam �...._._. ��� -
c 04,1
z
1� )L , 33/ 3'5
, , a 4 L4 aiv�c!. I
t -f-7 I
&DJ
2313-3
p
�d s
to. to
pe�
4 4 C) 3 G
13 � / 3.� 4 �4 - 0& /
THE /-lGV�! ASSOCIATION a e � s
WET
UNDIER IGNED BEM
THAT
1
IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH (BAYSHORE DRIVE AND OTHER THOROUGHFARES IN
COCONUT GROVE
namsisigned address
C VNARD
S>1 rrm
. rt
Lf,yw,!�o6 /Htc vit-h
Sly 4 D
1417S!C71
pit, number
r Cj 6c, y - 3 ) 6,,�
T jbdaZ� - -Z2 41
S13 s /4(-aGoce.i4--
LI) os /- -tl)z, Vie. Ar,F g
'3z27 Vii�,��� �X
w
77"A N4 J-
WE TP.
UNDeRSIGNED BELIeW. THAT
THERE SHOULD BE NO INCREASE
IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH SAYSHORE DRIVE AND OTHER THOROUGHFARES IN
COCONUT GROVE
natnt.'Printed namemigned address ph, number
KOM
/t �� t�9 {`{'� c`_.... C� f �Gti%C.' a9�� U� j L-t`—..__.� 1-t..._v_.__._.. ' j `/ � 2. V � xG. 1.�+' %'-' L n- / �3•I r't �j �-Ji'Y.+�:�.� �'�.
13e
V
�-�- I�NNA LCv�� 2�"�O-Cr�C��-It;�+=l
-j c-*
Y)'��
so
'Z -,e a\,,, �re_—o � 0 �)
3
C7 -
-3 -3
&A ( 64--( 0
�Jfi ME E- K pj� / � M Al
Sk ti I � K,ns4f--r
S'eri� h�CL
��a r{�6' late
—L
WE TkM UNDERSIGNED BELIEMP)THAT
THERE SHOULD BE NO INOREASE
IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH BAYISHORE DRIVE AND OTHan THOROUGHFARES IN
COCONUT GROVE
name printed namweigned address ph► number,
/c
-7-
3 j
t4 v%A.,o-
f4LAp-V7-*7/
Z 014V.SoA) 10
162 2,
LQb,
I 2j -0
ss.
2,S
JABy
vv
f�7
ekXMA),
Avf/b,a,
Ire-
3 3
LAJTtE:�.
Ll
Wl�re A Al+�C
•
O/Z
I
THE ASSOCIATION
9953
3100 JEFFERSON STREET -COCONUT GROVE $56-2477
3
IF YOU LIVE IN THE CITY OF MIAMI
PLEASE READ AND SIGN THE
PETITION TO THE CITY COMMISION
ON THE REVERSE, ID OF THIS SHEET
REVERSE *EI D OF I
/46y LJ.�/ c cSa,�/o�2
Z ?
y
co
LJV I
RAPHIC
A a ROUP
MNTINS�INC-
IF YOU LIVE IN THE CITY OF MIAMI
PLEASE READ AND SIGN THE
PETITION TQ THE CITY COMMI
ON THE REVERSE I
OF ID ' THIS $HtET OF
1.3
2-
Al,
--,c ' � -lcve.,
9- 1
4Q
(�/1��� �� ���� o/may
21
V*T
'e4
RAPHIC
Roup
P&TIN L CC PA
N9,7INC.
WE THF'bNbeRSIGl4eD MLIEVP MAT
IN
A
IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH BAYSWORE DRIVE AND OTHER THOROUGHFARES IN
COCONUT GROVE
name:printed nametslgned address phi number
.>. cd.cJi�
o((E �aRKtiZ
S a a rt�vz d
Toe,l L-UYV -
ni,ro l V�45ticll
( e -M
�s'f3 TrA✓e� g'
3 f 3'+ V*%nif Sires
`tw s-193
s!'
'.»wavuir+o-Lu_wu.u.u.uweiwn+b...,aa�....s.rw x,e...._ -.. - :... ...: ...��...�n-.{...:.. ..... .... .:.: ..-.sw....: ,.w....r.tanv ab•.- _ _ _ _�irvv. .-. -. ..
t
t e/'
f
` We the undersigned believe that there should be NO INCREASE 113 DENSITY
along South Bayshore Drive and other thoroughfares in C000nut CtOVei
Names printed Name": signed Address Phone number
�'-
y,(�1.�4�£,,�' + <
CL
LIEN
4r� '
{
t..
r"1 a
1:3;:� ! �.
i � ✓ r _ MY
042tw •�
cr,
vcls
3S-yS- C
3539
we 2�?7
V,4
Y, Pos f�g
e to I�a-Sjai��� � +5�1 S• �j 1��, �
Tim A$SUCIATION 3100 Jefferson Street C000nut Or qv,
a
fi A!
WE TA-# UNDE-Agl—GN—ED IIE1.IEV9*THAT
THERE SHOULD BE NO INCREASE
.1 IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH SAYSHORE DRIVE AND OTHER THOROUGHFARES IN
COCONUT GROVE
name:,printed namwaloned address ph, number
vAtl
o cw
U
0�i
3c,ql MAVI -'�r
'561tl
Art
rl
--T-7-Z:�-- Lo 4 7W 2 7
3 91.0
30 .4v -
'3�56 Ll 6*Qa (A
(6-0 s m'4 Ao)
3r)'76,-rLx'j
S 1 '73 A vmz- &tn>
3�73(k PALAM
one
0 JEFFERSON STREET COCONUT
q, 4�- � 3-D
46 7 -..2AK3
gs-t-OeI7
qj� (9 - 7 -f
-'F.3 2-
4&- 8))�
9953
�858-2477
MvE UNDERSIONLID"'O LIM T14AT
7HEkE SHOULD BE NOINCREASE
"�, ' IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH SAYSHORE DRIVE AND OTHER THOROUGHFARES IN
COCONUT GROVE
name-6printed namemigned addreafaph. number
A
��r 1
Cl� K)IOL rl
?
60 C2rL, —/)i*f V ;Iv Un
71,
V(/ lsa�l
- I
i::�-X7 17 14
re
v
2
21M c-
�(fy )v A(J-?-
2c-1
CR (C5 L 5; 9 1
?"',i'-A - ` 11
Ll -1
& dl-- 7�1Z._
THE ASSOCIATION c4 9 15
COCONUT GROVE $50-2477
3100 JEFFERS,ON STREET
ALONG SOUTH BAYSHORS DRIVE AND OTHER THOROUGHFARES IN
COCONUT GROVE
name:printed I name -,signed address ph, numbor.
U e(o
6 fyi,
rl NI
Pv/1
/ 6 C)_ 131 S w � 9 101L
I �/ N. L- , /0 ?,Y.
'SF5-
-7n- �(Y-(,v
WE Itt, UNDERSIGNED 139LIMV4i, THAT
THERE SHOULD BE NO INCREASE
IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH 13AYSHORE DRIVE AND OTHER THOROUGHFARES IN
COCONUT GROVE
name printed
a
nammigned
I
address phi mumber,
3tg-s q-W, 44,-2
o 44
kO
//;z / 41e
c-
S7-K- ?60)
t � `
n r ^
ATTENTIORH
,YOU DIVE IN THE COF MIAMI
., PLEASE REACH AND SIGN THE
17 PETITION TO THE CITY COMMISION
ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS SHEET
;3e Le
,r
-Urn
� t
'co
601-1)
-D
r
f ,
ARAPHIC
_
RUP
RRINiIMG �,
` LNG, INC,
444
Y
wDV,e,
:5 low 0 V-4 t,,,7Tjowr�4
we thc, 4indors ianc-cl he] icvt. that there should bc, W-) I 14'017Aclt OV' OEM tT
alonq South Bayshore Dl,.-ivE-, and other tliorou(jhfai,-(.,s Ili ct.,)conut Grove.
N a tn e printed y-:AIZ-;-7 A
Addresst
Name siqnature.-,,��I�V.v,, Phone number.
J
7
f
C)"A14 r"?L E
AAA//AA,,,,,,v RI?
L T
A;j A/ P-�G- EM.P-,-IV
7 tt-
'l 11, -rc �, M //j , r - 33, 1 7 F v
v
We THE UNDERSIGNED BELIEVE THAT
THERE SHOULD BE NO INCREASE
IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH SAYSHORE DRIVE AND OTHER THOROUGHFARES IN
COCONUT GROVE
namo.,,printed namo:loloned address ph, number
OA/5 r.-,,Il elf
C, 5-
-7 -7 --7 -7
774;
1,7
V
5
K
r
TY16AAA�',
vq,
VIJ-4
1f --il W2 ?
2-,Sys
's
THE ASSOCIATION
99 5 8*
2100 .199FRRSCIN STREET .0000NUT AMMVP RJR -0&77
M
ALONG SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE AND OTHER THOROUGHFARES IN
COCONUT GROVE
name,mrinted nammaigned address
THE
ASSOCIATION
3100 JEFFERSON STREET COCONUT GROVE 850-2477
f f
WE E UNDERSIGNED BELIF.Ilt THAT
nip -In
IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH 9AYSHOR9 DRIVE AND OTHER THOROUGHFARES IN
COCONUT GROVE
name:printed namomigned address ph, MUM
tt
V
ol VIA -rj
---)-
LA 41! "n K v v ,
Wg;Mg UNDERSIGNE 0 BELE-7M THAT
-0-0- 11 iql1iiiii - tA - m a 1111101114,11111 7km;l A& �
IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH BAY HORS DRIVE AND OTHER THOROUGHFARES IN
COCONUT GROVE
namcprinted namcoloned address ph, mumbor
.. ........... — - c �u- i. �-4 ��
Av"
12,
UTA
4,Y
(j
e4_1
C.-
71 Vroj f 3-6- Cc--)L.c
- el
_5 L
/0 2
53, ;_4L
THE ASSOCIATION-
9 5
8100 JEFFERSON STREET COCONUT GROVE 858-2477
a
WE TW UNDER SIGNED 99LIEV'irTHAT
THERE BE NODfNCREASE
IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE AND OTHER THOROUGHFARES IN
COCONUT GROVE
namcorinted namomigned address ph. nu
I I lillilm Solo
ber
f
01 A NZ-
1--,
x nut Cb
6r
-4 A 7 --7'951
5TEFAM
�7
k-) 42-
4-n e. � 0-,u
h- K,
fir' j�� f���,�;�,'<�-r=� ' �;z��-�,+�.�. ��:t-�%���� s - :��,�;�_�
'5C
-3 3
a 'o �
A C"t c-
.fA/ �(33
vv o4t
-7
,5Q
V e, 0-ttoukv ea
WE fqE UNDERSIGNED BILIEVETHAT
THERE SHOULD BE NO INCREASE
IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH 13AYSHORE DRIVE AND OTHER THOROUGHFARES IN
address., �number
Y
41, V
LeVA
8L
A
J
/Y
AN .4-t'v
Irl
rn
W114
THE ASSOCIATION
9953
ATTENTION r r
IF YOU LIVE IN THE CITY OF MIAMI
PLEASE READ AND SIGN THE
PETITION TO THE CITY ONIMI I N ,
CQU Qdru�—kjk Wk At&k vva_,-'k
CAN ill I SIDE OF THIS ISI-IET _
9-91bje Soto K
susor) L4plgp)f G Oo o 240;ze". �
IN DENSITY
ALONG SOUTH 6AY8HO148 DRIVE AND OTHER THOROUGHFARES IN
COCONUT GROVE
namovinted nama:81oned address ph, number
0
Alm
A-1
C�L
pQuc" -3 0
����6� N A ST �t.� Cote G
THE ASSOCIATION 995t
3100 JEFFERSON STREET COCONUT GROVE 858-2477
77777
WTf.
We the undetgigned beli.eVe thilf there shoulA be tin TNCTV'W"
alon4 South Aayshote DtiVe and othet thoroughfares iti Coconut
-,Name-. ptintod
,Name -. signature
Address:
Phohe humber:
tq L
Alt%_
Q
� (__
YY.Y-- sl- I& If 4
r'z4 1,,*
e-d
Avr_ 33133
144
I ,S lj t
ck�
Ci 7--
fi403
rULrL
let
ALONG SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE AND OTHeR THOROUGHFARIES IN
COCONUT GROVE
namor.-Printed namomigned address ph, number
6... �
K iff RL (--'a, -74 4 1 -
'n
) 7 IV- Yrtz
( - SYS2�
ti-
lF
Wow 5'eve-,,1z1tmvA",
S7
Low
We the undersigned believe that there should be No NONMSt OP ONAtTy
aloh4 South 8ayshote Drive and other thoroughfares in COdOnut OtOVe-
MaMet.
NAmb! signatUte
t�(A YA VI k c
gddregg!
Phone number: k-+5-Ll-
�&j
..A
;2e,
2 3
it
C�,
q qq
;fir � �L �� y " d � � f �� �' 7_�'t�� ,C/r, v`C �,� %`%*: �r trc �
j�,,,•-�.-.�,�..�,> ! 7 S` h1 • lsJ . a 1 (�J e (Y� � to rv��� 3 3 t n1 S
1 ("7
We Ole tindetsignea believe LIVIL there shmild he N'O JNCRLIA$I.l OF, 011INST'ry
-. i I on,(.,
South Bayshore ])rive and ot.her t.hol-OLIl:,Iifatc,-
Name: Printed Naive: signed A d d r c! ss
it mL
CJ
1�4CPLJ r-C� L L '0 lz_
-1
We the under signed believe that there shmild be NO TN(PV.ASV. or t)Vf4,etTII,—
alone South 8ayshore brive and other thoroucl-Ilifares in CoCohut 617-Ove,
Name! printed Address:
Name! signature Phone number:
C?
r s e.. '`�.. �f��'c f Cyr / �_'% / '17 -1
-4 7
ALONG SOUTH IBAYSHORE DRIVE AND OTHER THOROUGHFARES IN
COCONUT OV
rums:printed nameMigned aiddroas ph► numbor
_
_ _ ./ - �a'�' �' � � � ca..��c, _ter-�.•.�.� '"' ;a
c 9 I'll alo o /5t i, -
I
i
inwil
iNedhOddv. Jamuary 23 1096
Repel sneak zoning
n Coconut Grove
The question isn't development or not in Coconut Grove. in
a sense, that question Was answered when the Coconut Grove
Bank was built. Now the bank is dwarfed by neighboring
condotniniuMs; i
The question is how much more growth, and what kind, and
who is to benefit: The people who live ih the Grove now and Who
like the mixture that currently exists, other people who want to
Move Into the Grove as it is now, or the politicians who Want to
help the developers who in turn want to make money at the
expense of the neighborhood and the environment?
The Miami City Commission will take a big step toward
providing the answer at its zoning meeting tomorrow. Some of
the items on the agenda, although not that dramatic on their
face, could open the door to drastic and unnecessary changes.
One such Item is the proposed 1ayshore Drive Development
Study, a plan that would allow the builder of a residential/office
tower a bonus of 200 square feet for each additional public
parking space built in excess of the requisite amount of off-street
parking, as long as at least 100 extra parking spaces are
provided.
In other words, 100 extra parking spaces would provide
20,000 square feet of additional building space, and the use of
that extra square footage would be unrestricted by any zoning
requirements. Under this proposal, developers could build
structures up to 40 percent larger than is allowed now on South
Bayshore Drive across from Dinner Key.
And that means the Terremark Centre, the
office/retail/residential/parking structure — proposed to be
constructed at Aviation Avenue from South Bayshore Drive to
Tigertail Avenue, will, if the development study plan is
approved, end'1iwith more parking spaces than required, but
with substantially greater density than what is now zoned for
that area, and no zoning controls on the additional square
footage that would be allowed.
A companion proposal would change the zoning on a strip of
land along Tigertail Avenue from residential use to a zoning -
hybrid which could permit office high -.rises, presumably in
addition to Terremark's.
The philosophy underlying the zoning proposals raises
questions. Permitting increased density for a single project is bad
enough. But why does the city intend to compound matters by ; .
encouraging additional parking spaces and a zoning status which
can only invite increased density nearby? u"
And once the additional parking plan becomes a concrete
reality, how long would it.be before another developer took:_' . ,.
advagtage of the proposed one -size -fits -all zoning category and
used the same kind of excess parking trade-off that Terremark
wants to build another high-rise with excessive density? " ,
The city planners; and the commisgioners who agreed to the
plan on first reading earlier this month should be taking the long
view of development in the Grove. The long thew would --
emphasize, possibly even encourage, development farther west,
along South Dixie Highway and near the Metrorall line. That '
approach to zoning would have high-rises where increased
development ought to be, not in a neighborhood still largely,
single-family residential. t
People who use 1,95 to drive downtown from the south
see the tall and sparkling buildings mushrooming everyw� s
between the expressway and the bay. People who drive.onx
surface streets, however, know with sure regret that iWF '61
Is gone forever, and Brickell has become an urban canyoq
Changing the zoning along Tigertaii Avenue and app niA�
the parking space trade-off for Terremark and other dove `4
could all too literally pave the way for that kind of growY
South Bayshore Drive and the neighborhoods adjacent ton a w
C)
�7
9953
j yp
E A jv o 0 yam' 4w
1:::.
C'.
T
1N N'f Wit.. �
I
Lj
9—c �j v�
;
. ,)��--
,
Ar'`J'Ps c , 4, aA
2 ,.l Po
S ��
T( L .�r.s t� v 13
E kC x, A ` kQX sr .A" e4l,--r 7 fit'
5
t
, r 1
i
f
}
r
i
i
i
99 5 S °
1`
r
PACT SHEET
WHAT CHANUS DOES THE PROPOSED
SPI=17 AMONM
MATCH,` i
The proposed rezoning:
1. Changes the low density Residential zonod area now in place
along Tigertail Avenue, to high density office zoning.
This new zoning would allow the construction of 22 story
office building within 100 feet of Tigertail.
2. Would triple the amount of building within the area,
according to information provided by the planning department.
3. Would remove the existing SPI-3 zoning which was put in place
to respect and enhance the character of the neighborhood.
Our SPI=1 protects the "Special and Substantial public
Interest" of the area..
4. Would permit "floor area for any use" within new buildings;
This eliminates zoning completely.
5. Would remove the existing residential transition edge along
Tigertail..
This residential buffer assures a compatible and harmonious
relationship between the adjacent office and single family
residential districts.
E
FACE' SHM
,WHAT WILL THE EPPECTS OP THE PROPOM
SPI -1i REZONING
SF
The proposed rezoning will:
1. Further deteriorate traffic conditions which are already
severe.
The South Florida Regional Planning Council reports
"unacceptable levels of service are projected on nine
regionally significant arterials (thirteen roadway segments)
in the impact area during the peak hour".
2. increase the bulk and size of projects in the area.
In the case of the Terremark parcel, the amount of office
space allowable will increase by 136% -- more than double
what the existing zoning allows.
3. Result in the building of massive "ancillary structures" such
as parking garage.
In the case of the Terremark project, the size of the garage
structure will be over 380,000 square feet -- larger than
the office building itself.
4. Result in the building of an excessive number'of parking spa-
ces.
I' The City's planning department project over 2,000 additional
parking spaces will be built, yet they say there is a need
for only 650.
5. Require the rebuilding of the area's sanitary sewer system.:
The City's department of public works estimates the cost of
such work to be half a million dollars. The system would
not have to be rebuilt if the existing zoning was
maintained.
LIN6A R66641eR AbLkA
Midi h 6. AL19ElttIkk
Li?1AA L. ALVAPH
OU66LO14 f. AMA66N
RtC14AN6 A. ARRIN
O€U11N 6'6. A1RtW
IM4111 L. &ARbH
-HILARIt GA51
N64MAN J. BANPOhib
MA#R 8 61.66M
19UAt dRU+dN
Sttvt AULL6GA
R6DtRt It. IIURLIN6+6N
ALAN R. emAft
3UE M. 6566
RtNbALL 11. e6k0tV
MARK 11. bAVIS
69eA11 G. f3t LA GuAOb1A
kAkA€L 6. 01A1
ALAN t. 61MCNb
OHAbLtb W. k6640R, ht
CAR+ M. t8§ttm
tMOMAS k. tCUELS
btANt b, kERII*AR6
LAuRA A. GANGEMI
AleRAO6 d. 6AAACtt
bAVlb J. (3AYN6R
LAWittNCC 40b6"Ity
ALAN 6. GCLb
HARvtt A. GOLbMAN
LA* 61�Plttfi
G'n'6"`E"`IVatna,TOIAUAlG1 A§KtW, HOF`PMAN, IrIOOPP, 009fN OUtNTt'C►1 P, A.
MVEN L. 66L6MA14
SttVtw M. 6601Mttm
LAWAWt S. 56461614
MAtt1+11:W !l. 660196N
MtLVIN N. 614tNh9116
MA411-t'N 5. 6ALWILAtt
1001Wlt L. 606111IMAN
ktNNBtH C. 146PPMAN
LARRY J. H60MAN
AIW6L6 M. JAkkkt
MA11e6t b 01101ENEi
MAOIN RAL'S
01611E0it A RAGLAN
aubltm IttkWe
tIMOtHY t. klbH
ALAN N. RF35L6W
bttVAN J. 01111AVItt
Sttv1;N A. LAN6Y
ALAN 6. LtbthMAN
LAWdtNet b. LEVY
N6AMAH H. 006kk
45A11v b: 00401Y
CAALbS E. L6UM1tt
JuAN P. LOUMIEt
bt8f3lt RUtH MALINSkr
OkbRO A. MAOtIN
JOEL b. MA$tR
ALAN M. MlteHtL
ALICIA M. MORALES
LOUIS N615t00
am DELIVERED
Lucia Allen Dougherty
City Attorney
-174 East Flagler Street
Miami, Florida 33131
ANtR6NG J. 6'66NNtLL. JA,
JULit it. 6Lbt046k9'
1ttvAN J, bAA66
8Y0614 e. I51ttt115EN
ALSEiSi' 6. 6UkNttL
bALE 1. AttlNtLLA
Will AtItth 1
NItw6LA5 :16dkWtLL
MAI*ViN S. 06SEN
I56NAL6 M.:1d9ENGARTEN
bAv16 L 06bb
ItOSERt b IIUSIN
kAl*tN b AuN60U13t
5+kVtN t. SAIaILJAN
GAA,f A. HAUL
CLlkkdelb A. SCHULMAN
MARLIN 9. SMAO106
MA(*LENt k. SILVtAMAN
StUARt H. StNdIth
t1M6tMV A. &M&H
rSAMUtL 9U 31
4046tRt M. SU5kIN
V6LANbA MELLON tARAkA
GAAV IS. tiMIN
0166flit H. tRAURIG
JONATHANH. WARNER
bAVIb M. WELLS
JERROLb A. WISH
DY11
A AMOLtO k M695. OW
UtNAOt W.�160P . I 6k 66UNUL
6 fi1*IeRtLL t 19NedILI b
o
r
M841dikkLL AVLNUC
MIAM1 kL60*16A $313i
1AMt (305) 510-bb66
j(56b) 69368111
1 o ttLtR d' 6 • Jtkd
tELEebbY (365) b1b. 391b
IO0 16UtH 51k1E 416HWAY
WtSt PALM btAtM. PL60116A 33x61
(366) aba-a3;�3
W01ttR b blotet No: -
(309) 570-0880
January 230 1985
RtPLY TO: MIAMI i PIrlet
Re: Response to Susan R. Cohen's Letters of
January 15, 1985 and January 16, 1985 -
Agenda Items 48-51 on the
January 10 City Commission Hearing Agenda and the
January 16 Planning Advisory Board Meeting on
Terremark Centre Major Use Special Permit and
Development of Regional Impact Application
Dear Ms. Dougherty:
Ms. Cohen has supplemented her letter of January 9, 1985
with two additional letters raising certain legal and planning
issues. This letter responds to those additional issues as
follows:
(1) SECTION 15172.2.1 CONTAINS INADEQUATE GUIDELINES
AND STANDARDS FOR ADMINISTERING. THE PARKING
BONUS
Section_ 15172.2.1, entitled "Publicly Accessible Parking,"
contains clearly defined guidelines and standards. The bonus is
self-executing when the following criteria are met:
.e
Ze
L
9 9 5 8
f
4
Lucia Allen Dougherty
January 23r 1985
Page 2
1. There must not be less than 100 parking spaces
in excess of Code.
2. The spaces must
public during normal business
activities or attractions in
public facilities.
be available to the general.
and operating hours of public
the Dinner Key or adjacent
3. The entrance to the access parking facilities
must not be further than 600 feet from the main entrance of
a structure housing a major public activity, such as a par-
formance hall, specialty center, exhibition center or con-
ference facility.
4. The cumulative additional floor area permitted
under the section may not exceed .50 x gross lot area.
Such criteria avoid any improper delegation of legislative
power as considered in City. of _Miami V. Save Brickell Avenue,
Inc. 426 So.2d 1100 (Pla. 3d DCA 19 3) and City of Coral Gables
v. Deschamps, 242 So.2d 210 (Fla. 3d DCA 1 In Save
Brickell, for instance, the wording of the ordinance at issue
permitted the City Commission total discretion to disregard the
listed criteria and instead to base a decision upon criteria that
were not listed or no criteria at all. Similarly, in Deschamps,
the record before the court was devoid of any standard, guideline
or qualification for the enactment of the ordinances and resolu-
tions in question.
As noted above, there is no question that the SPI-17 ordi-
nance contains specific criteria. What the opponents really
contend is that the criteria have no rational relationship to the
public parking need. The City Planning Department, however, has
testified to the contrary. The Planning Department has projected
the total number of spaces which realistically can be anticipated
from the bonus in relation to the public parking needs required
in the Dinner Key area for both the short and long term. These
needs are addressed in the proposed SPI-17 ordinance which caps
the number of parking spaces that can be provided by reference to
the 600.foot radius and the 100 parking space criteria.
(2) TERREMARK NEEDS A REZONING AMENDMENT (RAISED BY
MS. COHEN'S, LETTER OF JANUARY 16, 1985)
Ms. Cohen argues that the Terremark project is inconsistent
with existing zoning. This is correct but, Terremark's pending
GREENBERG, TRAURIG, ASKEW, HOFFMAN. LIporF, RosEN eo OUENTEL, P. A,
9953
rw
11
Lucia Allen Dougherty
January 23, 1085
Page 3
application for DRI and major uae apecial permit is continent
upon approval by the City Commission of the pending SPI-17 an
related zoning changes. To the extent that Ms. Cohen is implying
that the property owner must file for the zone change in order to
process a DRI or a major use special permit# she is incorrect. A
major use special permit is triggered, under Article 38, Miami
Zoning Code, by the number of perking spaces involved. Moreover,
a major use permit is a "development permit" under Chapter 380
which requires DRI review when the DRI thresholds are exceeded.
Accordingly, the DRI and major use process can operate indepen-
dently of any City initiated rezoning.
Moreover, all zoning notices have been published by the City
of Miami as part of its comprehensive zoning amendment for the
area in question. Any reference to "rezoning" in the DRI notice,
published in November 1984, pursuant to Section 380.06(10),
Florida Statutes, is mere surplusage. Obviously, the notice was
framed to advise the general public that issues other than the
DRI may be heard before the Planning Advisory Board and the City
Commission, although such specific items would have to be subject
to the City's own notice requirements which have been met.
In sum:
(a) The Terremark project requires no notice of
rezoning independent of the general notices published by the
City for the comprehensive zoning amendment.
(b) The 60-day notice was advertised in accordance
with Section 380.06(10), Florida Statutes.
(c) The major use special permit for the Terremark
Centre has been properly advertised both before the Planning
Advisory Board and the City Commission.
(d) All revisions to the ADA have been available in
the files of the Regional Planning Council and the City of
Miami. As noted in the report of the Regional Planning
Council, these revisions reduced the scale of the project
and accordingly did not substantially change the ADA which
has been on file with the City and the Regional Planning
,Council since July, 1984.
GREEN9ERG, TRAURIG, ASKEW, HOFFMAN, LiPOFF, ROSEN 8c OUENTEL, P. A,
9953
n
Lucia Allan Dougherty
January 23, 1085
Page 4
3) SECTIONS 3509.1 AND 3507 EAVR OEM MUM I
THAT THE +ORICINAL THRREMARK APPLICATION POE
The 60wday requirement in Section 3508.21 City of Miami
Zoning Code, is intended to be for the protection of the appli-
cant. mere the applicant has agreed that its original applica-
tion would not .be heard while the City of Miami considered the
Bayshore Drive study. Furthermore, the Planning Advisory Board,
as a matter of law, could not consider the application because
the report of the South Florida Regional Planning Council was not
rendered until January, 1355. Section 350.06(12), Florida
Statutes. According to Section 3508.2, City Zoning Code, this
report was required in order for the public hearing to be held.
Accordingly, the Planning Advisory Board took action on the modi-
fied application within 60 days after the South Florida Regional
Planning Council staff report was submitted to the City of Miami.
What Ms. Cohen misunderstands, is that the original
Terremark application has proceeded under the major use special
permit as modified. By modification of the ADA and the applica-
tion for special use major permit, the applicant has withdrawn
its original application for RO-3/8 rezoning and, in lieu
thereof, has supported the City's comprehensive rezoning for the
Bayshore district.
(4) THE REMAINING POINTS RAISED IN MS. COHEN'S LETTER
WILL BE SEPARATELY ADDRESSED BY MR. WILLIE
BERMELLO, THE PROJECT ARCHITECT
Thank you again for your attention to this matter.
ASG/wp
4an
e
.Gold
GREENBERG, TRAURIG, ASKEW, HOFFMAN, LIPOFor, ROsEN 9c QUENTEL, P. A. r 0
l ��qµ 1I� �yinrtc �s I1Y# 1I1 �pp Ni�st1�.j { �L rA1�Ny C�`ll'E ftt.
s .L71� ttN§tA6,'T14AVA)VI A§KtW{ 1'10 r mm4, LIPO Pf A*3t 1 OUtN 1 tL, i'A A.
LINbA K661101tk AbL€k4
fAt€V€N €. 66LbMAN
ANTH6Nv J. 6'b6kN€LL, Jk
K0614A€L 6. ALR€#tikk
$ttV€N M, 66L55141tH
JULIt K. OLb€r46k-P
tt§AA L. ALVA14€1
LAWAtNC€ §. 661066N
StkvAN J, OAkbO
€tU66LON P. AAA6 �N
MAttH€W 01. 66466N
Svk6N G. k€tt(*tkN
NitHAkb A. AftkIN
M€LVIN N. GA€tNS€RG
ALb€14t b. bUtNttL
P€UAIN 6'b. ASk€W
MAI7ILYN b. CG€l N1ILAtt
bAL€ S. Attlk tLLA
k€Rkl L. bAkbH
Rbb€kt L. Gk6§E;MAN
LUIS R€It€k
WLARI€ OAdt
kthk&H It, HOFFMAN
NICHOLAS 146CKW€LL
N64MAN J. b,tNlbkb
LAkkY J. HOI€MAN
MAkv!N 5. 065€N
MARR b. OL66M
AANOLb M. JAi• tt
RONALb M, RO5€NGA§t y4
604t SRUtdIN
MARtbt b. JIM€N€2
bAVIO L, ROSS
bt€Vt SULLOCk
MAAfIN KALb
0*66tOt b 14UBIN
46likkt K. RUIOLINGtON
461104t A. KAPLAN
KAktN b, RUNbdouiSt
ALAN R. GHA§E
JUbITH k€NNtY
$ttV€N t, 3AMILJAN
but M. e6ab
tIM6t'HV E. KISH
GARV A. SAUL
k€NbALL 8, COI IEY
ALAN 6. kOSLOW
CL10*60b A. SCHULMAN
MAkk @. bAv15
St€VtN J. KRAVItf
MAOtIN $. SHAbIR6
bsc'AR G. bt LA GUAFtbtA
§tkVkN A. LANbY
MARLINE K. SILVtRMAN
14AIALL O. blAt
ALAN 5, LtbtRMAN
StuAklt H. SINGtk
ALAN t, btm6kb
LAWAtNCt S. L€VY
TIMOTHY A. SMITH
OHARLtS W, tbGA1t, iri:
NORMAN H. LI06kP,
SAMU€L %U51
dARY M, EvSTtlk
GARr b. LIP50N
HEketRt M. SUSKIN
tHOMAS R. €OU€LS
CARLOS it, LOUMItt
VOLANbA M€LLON tAkAIA
61ANt b, fthkA1t0
JUAN P. Lbumitt
GARr P. TWIN
LAURA A. 6AN0€MI
b€bbi€ RUtH MALIN5kY
Rbtltpt H. t0AU14IG
AldHAPO G. OAkREtt
ft&RO A, MARtiN
JONAtHAN H. WARN€R
bAVIb J. 6AYNOR
JOtL b, MAStR
OAVIb M. W€LLb
LAWPkNC GbbOkSkr
ALAN M. MIttHEL
JtRROLD A. WISH
ALAN S, 6OL6
ALICIA M. MbRALtS
HA17VtY A. GOLOMAN
LOUIS NOStRO
HAND DELIVERED
Lucia Allen Dougherty
City Attorney
174 East Flagler Street
Miami, Florida 33131
AM&L€fit W M6!1§ JI4.
�tAC4Ak4t H. W6LFI
btr 66UN§EL
r\� '11h1Ck€LL d6NdOUft
(461 111*16RELL AVI NUt
MIAMi PL(5AIbA S1131
41 s MIAMI (3b3) b99•b666
666wAkb (16t) 5.tl•bm
tEL tObY (16W bt)b-Wig
100 56UtH bIXIt H16HWAY
Wttt PALM StAtH, FL6PIBA 13461
(; 09) 8b9.6333
whit€k'S b1 ttt 146:
January 220 1985
Re: Response to Letter of Susan R. Cohen
Dear Lucia:
(305) 579"0880
RtPLY fib: MIAMi 6POleE
Please be advised that this office represents Grove Bay
Plaza, Ltd., the owners of the Terremark Centre property located
in Miami (Coconut Grove), Florida. We have received a letter to
your attention from Susan R. Cohen Es I , q., dated January 9, 1985
relative to Agenda Items 40(a) through 51, as they appeared on
_ the January loth City Commission Agency. In her letter,
- Ms. Cohen raises several alleged procedural defects which she
claims divests the City Commission of jurisdiction to hear the
above agenda items. We respectfully disagree with Ms. Cohen's
analysis and offer our comments with respect to the following
i`
points included in her letter:
1
LUCiA Allen b6ugherty
January 22t 1595
Page 2
1.
Ms. Cohens' states that the parking bonus in
15172.2.1 of the proposed SPI-17 Ordinance allows rezoning to
"any land use," This is incorrect. The. SPI-17 zoning district
is an overlay district which modifies regulations within the
existing district only to the extent indicated in the SPI regula-
tions. See Section 15172, Accordingl.yo use of the phrase "for
any any use" in 9 15172.2.1 must be read in conjunction with the
remainder of the SPI-17 ordinance. The effect is that the park-
ing bonus is available for any use within the 903J6.district. We
would have no objection if the proposed SPI-17 regulations were
specifically clarified to this effect.
2. THE NOTICE OF A CHANGE FROM RG/5 To R03
E.
A notice of hearing on a proposed ordinance is not
defective because of ambiguity where it properly describes the
land in issue and recites that the proposal is to change the
zoning classification from one specific use district to another
specific use district. See Bregar v. Britton, 75 So.2d 753, 756
(Fla. 1954), where the Florida Supreme Court held a notice of
publication sufficient where it clearly stated in the notice that
the petition upon which the hearing was to be held was an appli-
cation to "rezone from A to C-3" even though the notice did not
contain the words "drive-in theater" which was the desired use.
Absent a specific requirement in the relevant statute or
ordinance, the notice need not include the whole text of proposed
ordinance. Anderson, American Law of Zoning, S 4.14, pages 208
209.
The cases cited by Ms. Cohen do not support the claimed
impropriety of the public notice. Rather, these cases involved
questions where the properties were rezoned to a classification
not specifically included in the notice or where the notice was
so fataly vague as to not give the public any reasonable oppor-
tunity to understand what zoning change would be implemented if
it were adopted. Neither situation exists under the present
circumstances.
GREENBERG, TRAURIG, ASKEW, HOFFMAN, LIPOFF, RoSEN & OUENTEI., P. A. -. 99 5 3
Lucia Allen boughetty
January 22, 1985
Page 3
3 .
We have noted above that Ms. Cohen is incorrect in her
interpretation
that a
re intense land use is permitted under
the r p g than what otherwise exists under the underlying
zoning district. Moreover, the proposed city rezoning does not
change the Miami comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. Mather, it is
consistent with the Plan by permitting only residential uses
adjacent to Tiger Tail or, if no residential uses are to be con-
structed, then requiring that a 100 foot landscape buffer be
established. Representatives of the Planning Department have
already testified at hearings before the Planning Advisory Board
that such uses are consistent with the Miami comprehensive Neigh-
borhood Plan and are further consistent with the adopted Bayshore
Drive Development study which constitutes a refinement of the
Plan to the neighborhood in question.
4. THE ZONING APPLICATIONS FILED BY THE CITY ARE IN
VIOLATION OF SECTION 3514.31, CITY OF MIAMI CODE
8TH MONTH RULE).
Section 3514 does not limit the City Commission from
considering or acting upon the implementation of a comprehensive
zoning amendment for an area. Presumably, Ms. Cohen is referring
to § 3514.3 which provides:
"Whenever the City Commission has changed the
zoning classification of property by amend-
ment, the Zoning Board shall not thereafter
consider any petition for rezoning for all
or any part of the same property for a
period of 18 months from the date of such
action."
This section contemplates that a petition for rezoning would be
filed by a property owner who would then have further hearing by
the Zoning Board on the petition. This section does not apply,
however, where the zoning action is question is initiated by a
city department. Under § 3503, Miami Zoning Code, public hear-
ings on such applications are heard by the Planning Advisor
Board, not by the Zoning Board. Accordingly, Section 3514.3 is
inapplicable.
GREEN BERG,TRAURIG,ASKEW, HOFFMAN, LIPOFF, RosEN & QUENTEI., P,A,
9953
Lucia Allen bougherty
januaty 22, 1085
Page 4
S.
You have previously addressed this issue at the City
Commission hearing and correctly rulsai that private covenants do
not control or limit City initiated zoning actions, in addition,
a review of the covenant proferred by Ms. Cohen indicates that it
is not inconsistent with the proposed zoning action.
6.
At the first reading, the Planning Department dis-
agreed as a matter of fact with Ms. Cohen and testified that the
SPT-17 ordinance was filed of record thirty days prior to the
date set for the public hearing. In any event, Ms. Cohen over-
looks that S 166.041(3)(c)(1) applies _on1 to those property
owners whoso Sand is to be rezoned or a ected by the proposed
change in permitted use. This special class of land owners is to
receive actual notice of the change by mail. The notice is only
required to state the substance of the proposed ordinance as it
affects that property owner as well as the time and place owe
public hearings on the ordinance. Contrary to Ms. Cohen's inter-
pretations, the whole ordinance need not be included in or with
the notice. The notice is also to be kept available for public
inspection, although the general public is separately notified by
newspaper publication, posting and, and, where applicable,
courtesy notices. Such publication occurred in accordance with
City requirements and the SPI-17 ordinance proposal was available
at least from that date.
Thank you in advance for your consideration of these
matters.
Sincerel T
Alan S. Gold
ASG:wp
cc: Susan Cohen, Esq. (By Hand Delivery)
Joel Maxwell, Esq. (By Hand Delivery)
GREENSERG, TRAURIG, ASKEW, HOFFMAN, UpoFF, ROSEN & OUENTEL, P. A. (�
■
11
r•
y
IBERMtLLO, KURKI & VEPA. INC. - ARCHItECtS. PLANNERS alfftmAN bttirNERS
NtW WOOLO towrR • SUITC 1+400 + 100 N. BISCAYNE f30UULVARb . MIAMI# PL 33132
January 23, 1585
Mr. Sergio L. Rodriguez
Director
City of Miami Planning Department
275 N.W, 2 Street 3rd Pl.00r HAf�D DLLtVSRED
Miamit Plorida 33128
Re: Letter of Susan R. Cohen dated January 16, 1985, addressed to
Mrs. Lucia Dougherty regarding the January 16th PAB meeting on
Terremark Centre
Dear Mr. Rodriguez,
We would like to address several points raised in Ms. Cohenls letter
dated January 16, 1985:
1, Terremark Centre conforms to SPl-17 and does not need any re-
zoning amendments.
Ms. Cohen has incorrectly -calculated the allowable development
intensity either by using the wrong net lot area in her compu-
tations (i.e. net lot area is 144,683.72 sq. ft. or 3.32 acres);
or improperly calculating the gross lot area which for the sub-
ject parcel is 188,389.056 sq. ft. and not 183,400 sq. ft..as
claimed by Ms. Cohen. Please note that in accordance with
Ordinance 9500 the gross lot area has been calculated by comput-
ing up to 50% of the Tigertail and Aviation Avenue public right-
of-way; and as per Sector (6), 66 ft. of the South Bayshore Drive
right-of-way since the subject property is located across from
public open space which is of a permanent nature..
A copy of the work sheet utilized in calculating gross lot area
and allowable development intensity is enclosed (see Exhibit A).
The maximum development intensity allowed on the subject property
under the proposed SPI-17 maximum FAR of (1.71) is a total of
322,145.28 sq. ft.; and not the 313,614 sq. ft. stated in Ms.
Cohen's letter.
WILLY A.BERMELLO A.1-A,A.I.C.P.
HARRY M. KURKI AA A•
REINALDO VERA A.I.A.
Mir
15 3
11
s
Mr, Sergio t, Rodriguez
Jahu aty 13, 1985
Page two
2. The proposed Tertemark Centre project consists of 314,000 sq. ft.
of offices; 8,000 sq. ft, of ground floor retail; and 19,200 sq, ft.
of residential townhouse units fronting on Tigertail,
In her letter, Ms, Cohen interprets that the development intensity
of the project is 3410200 sq. ft. and consequently in excess of the
allowed FAR, however, Ms. Cohen has again failed to properly in-
terpret the correct procedures for calculation of FAR, since the
proposed SPI--11 does not consider the Tigertail Avenue, "residential
buffer" towards the calculation of FAR,
In accordance with SPI=17, Terremark Centre has a development in-
tensity of 322,000 sq. ft. for purposes of FAR; and this amount is
below the maximum allowed by SPI-17.
3. Ms. Cohen states that Terremark Centre is in violation of Ordinance
9500 as a result of the parking garage. It is apparent that Ms.
Cohen has incorrectly interpreted the parking structure as a
"principal use" (i.e. an independent structure constructed for
commercial purposes), In effect the parking garage is an "ancillary
use" serving the office tenants, townhouse residents and the
general, public.
As an "ancillary" facility the parking garage does not require a
special exception nor is it's area (sq. ft.) counted towards the
FAR allowed by code.
We hope that we may have assisted in clarifying some of the technical
issues raised by Ms. Cohen.
Sincerely,
Willy A. Bermello
President
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Walter Pierce, Assistant City Manager
Mr. Alan S. Gold, Esq.
Mr. Manuel D. Medina
Mr_ JnP1 Maxwell. Esa.
EXH IB IT A
GROSS LOT AREA, FAR & FARMING CALCULATIONS
A, GENERAL INFORMATION
a, Street frontage/S. Bayshore Drive at 250 ft,
Aviation at 577.62 ft,
Tigertail at 250 ft.
b. Net lot area: 144,683.12 sq. ft, (3,32 acres)
c. Gross lot area: 188,H M56 sq. ft.
d, Development area: (199,389,056) (1.21) = 227,950.75
e, Required parking: (227,950.75) (1/600) = 379 parking spaces
f. Parking provided: 1,050 parking spaces
g. Excess parking: 670 parking spaces
h. Bonus/parking: (670) (200) = 134,018.00
227,950.75
361,968.75 sq. ft.
i. Maximum F.A.R. cap = (188,389.056) (1.71) = 322,145.28 sq. ft.
j. Parking analysis
(322,145.28) (1/600) = 536 parking spaces
1,050 parking/provided
536 parking/required
( 514 parking/excess) (200 sq. ft./parking) = 102,800 S.F.
102,800 S.F.
227,950.75 S.F.
330,750.75 S.F. is greater than 322,145.28 the maximum development
intensity
�vrt_urt _
~ .. •— •—�--
l�t •.n•v / ••`—•i RIM-, /"'� .» .» fir.► i { .•� r0.7
ell 1 i rJ ..« ..... I�—�il ►, : 'T . _.
.a � r , r� 3. Ir .`rr� '1 .t � ,�i ,�� ':•1 N � i i a' ii � t �� r .. , ..w..r �.l ilY r
IV'' i1 ,,y � I .-�♦e.� � • I (�i.�tMw � 4 �—�ro•r i i' 1 re—•.o.. !'— �'.a'r �1
�1' ... ..
(i— r 1, .l r+ 'r• r rr .r rr Lr r
wt
! L� R• i% N O T[ L 0 T E L �� N' Q` T[ I, '( h�•
s 0 U N t T I, S 0 U' H T Y il��j; ,i �'r�tF w.cp U. w r r
{ /f� j �' �ai •� , �M� i��. � c rJ t{.✓'r'ya' t�.►�a�t••
;57¢ • 4-7 -157& 05
G72 os
SITE SURVEY,
11 The Following. alnendMeht is ptopoged to the SPl-17
tayshore Overlay bistrict:
8P1-1.7 8OUTH 8AY8HORE bPtvS MALAY D18TPYCT
Section 15172.2.1 Publicly Accessible Parking
(c) The entrance to the excess parking facility shall not be
farther than six hundred (600) feet from the main entrance
of a structure housing the
following activity centers identified in the "binner Xey
Master Plan": a performance hall, specialty center,
exhibition center or conference facility. The six hundred
.(600) feet shall be measured along a radius from a public
t
pedestrian entrance of a structure housing e activity
center. For the purposes of this Section, the Dinner Key
Master Plan" is defined to be that Plan adopted in principle
by Motion No. 84-1188, dated October 19t 1984 of t e City of
Miami Commission. A copy of the Dinner Key Master Plan, as
adopted in principle, is on file with the City Clerk an
CitY of Miami Planning Department.
It is the intent of these special public interest
district regulations that future public and private
development shall respect and enhance this character#
preserving area -wide property values and enhancing
Coconut drove's desirability as a place to live and
work. These regulations are intended to apply to the
high density mixed -use development area abutting South
Sayshore give by providing height limits, special
setback and view corridor requirements, transitional
use and design requirements, incentives to provide
publicly available parking for Dinner Rey activitiea►
and design review guidelines.
SECTION 15172. E 'PEO' _ c SPI 1'i DISTRICT DESIONA-.
TION.
The effect of these SPI regulations shall be to
modify regulations within portions of the existing
district indicated in the Official Zoning Atlas as
within its boundaries to the extent indicated herein
for the SPI-district. Modifications are listed below.
15172.1. LIMITATIONS ON USES - TRANSITIONAL
BUFFER.
For those portions of lots abutting public
right-of-way that separates different zoning districts
the following use limitations shall apply%
(a) For the first 100 feet of lot depth adjacent
to Tigertail Avenue there shall be a land-
scaped yard area, except that residential
uses, excluding hotels and motels, that front
on Tigertail Avenue may be developed in
accordance with other provisions of this
district. Provided that residential develop-
ment occurs, ancillary and parking structures
for non-residential uses no greater in height
than the residential structures may be
located below grade to within twenty (20)
feet of Tigertail Avenue or above grade
within (50) feet of Tigertail Avenue, provide
further that such ancillary or parking
structures are completely screened from view
along Tigertail Avenue by the residential
structures.
(b) For the first fifty (50) feet of lot depth
adjacent to Mary Street, there shall be a
landscaped yard area, except that for
development which qualify under provisions of
Section 2003.7 of this ordinance, principle
use structures may be set back not less than
ten (10) feet from Mary.Street provided that
ground level convenience retail uses front on
not less than 65 percent of the Mary Street
frontage.
15172.2. EXCEPTIONS TO FLOOR AREA RATIO
LIMITATIONS.
Notwithstanding floor area ratio limitations of
existing districts lying within the SPI-17 district
boundaries, the flow area ration may be increased in
accordance with the following provisions.
15172.2.1. PubliclX Accessible Parking.
ror every non-residential parking space provided
in excess of offstreet parking requirementsr an
additional two hundred (200) square feet of floor area
for any vse,,ahall be permitted$ provided however.
eye., i; !' �l"
9953
11
cep
5
(a) dubh parking space shall be not less than one
hundred (100) spaces and ad eessible by the
general public during normal business and
operating hours of public activities at
attractions in Dinner trey or adjacent public
facilities.
(b) Parking fees charged shall not be in excess
of prevailing rated for public metered
parking in the vicinity, as established by
the Miami Oepattment of Off -Street Parking.
bO
(a) The entrance to the excess parking facility
shall not be farther than six hundred (600)
feet from the main entrance of a structure "�, tA
housing a major y,� ��
e aily,�� ��
_ � public activit , such as a.
performance h, specialty center, exhi'
o N
ton center or conference facility.
(d) In no case shall the cumulative ditional
floor area permitted under s sec.tion
\ exceed .50 times gross lot -r- b ,v'�
15172.2.2, 1 Ttansitional buffe - (residential.
1 O.
Residential uses (excluding hotel use) may be *"
permitted within the limitations of the land useQ
intensity sector 4 only for that portion of the lot
within one hundred (100) feet of the zoned right-of-way
line of Tigertail Avenue to establish a buffer adjacent
to high density non-residential uses. Floor area
permitted by this section shall be in addition to the -
maximum allowable for other uses.
15172.3. SPECIAL LIMITATIONS ON WALLS,
VEHICULAR WAYS AND PARKING IN A
i
REQUIRED SPECIAL YARD.
There shall be provided an average yard area
setback along South Bayshore Drive of thirty (30) feet
+ within which walls, fences and hedges over three feet
- in height shall be prohibited. No parking, except for
passenger drop-off facilities, shall be permitted and
- vehicular drives shall not occupy more than twenty-five
(25) percent of the required special yard area.
15172.4. SPECIAL HEIGHT LIMITS.
No building within this district shall exceed a
height of two hundred fifty (250) feet or twenty-two
- (22) stories in height whichever is lower, and no
building within 100 feet of the zoned right-of-way of
Tigertail Avenue shall exceed forty-five (45) feet.
SECTION 15173. CLASS C SPECIAL PERMIT.
i
15173.1. When Required.
No building permit shall be issued within the
boundaries of the SPI-17 district affecting the height,
bulk, location or exterior configuration of any
existing structure, the construction of any new
structure, or the location or relocation or enlargement
of vehicular ways or parking areas on private property,
without authorization by Class C special permit.
15173.2. Materials to be Submitted with
App lditlwons.
No building permit shall be issued within the
boundaries of the SPI-17 district affecting the special
W2-
•
MIAMI R15VIr:W
AND DAILY RECORD
Published Daily except Saturday, Sunday and
Legal Holidays
Miami, Dade County, Florida.
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF DADE:
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared
Octelma V. Ferbeyre, who on oath says that she Is the Supervisor
of Legal Advertising of the Miami Review and Daily Record, a
daily (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) newspaper,
published at Miami In Dade County, Florida; that the attached
copy of advertisement, being a Legal Advertisement of Notice
in the matter of
CITY OF MIAMI
Re: ORDINANCE NO. 9953
X X X
Inthe ......................................... Court,
was published in said newspaper in the issues of
Feb.1, 1985
Afffent further says that the sold Miami Review and Daily
Record is a newspaper published at Miami in said Dade County,
Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been
continuously published in said Dade County Florida, each day
(except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) and has been
entered as second class mail matter at the poet office in
Miami in sr id Dade County, Florida, for a period of one year
next preceding the first publication of th97 attached copy of
advertisement• and afflant further says that she has neither
paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount,
robate, commission or refund fort urpose of securing this
adve a ant for publication i sa newspaper.
3wom it and subscAeed:before me this
lst �J0 Ve , J- •
b 85
....... day _ /.. ., &D. 19...... .
�1
• BL' SonjA'liel ~ n ' " . ' •
�� Motary Public, Slateao oride at Large
�, lF
My Commission exIf I 61E t��;
60V 60 MIAMI, DADS 66111li1'Vi 1111,6015l
LEGAL NOTIOR
All thtot0ted pAri;dhs Will tgke n6tict3 that on the Nth day cif
January, 1955, the City 06MMi691611 of Miami, Florida, addptbd the
following titled eitdlhance(sy
6AbINANCE NO. 9066
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF 0001,
NANCE NO.9500, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, PLORIDA, BY CHANGING THE
SIFiCATION OF APPROXIMATELY 2li143 Si
TEARACE,, MIAMI, FLORIDA, (MORE I
DESCRIBED HEREIN) FROM M0,113 GEN
TIAL (ONE AND TWO FAMILY) TO OA-W
AESIbENT1AL (GENERAL) SY MAKING Fly
MAKING ALL THE NECESSARY CHANGE
Ili OF SAID ZONING ATLAS MADE A PART
NO.06W BY AEFEAENCE AND bESCAIP1
3, SECTION 300, THEREOF; CONTAINING A
VISION AND A $EVEAABILITY CLAUSE,
ORDINANCE NO.9061
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS ORbl-
NANCE NO, 0500, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, BY APPLYING THE HC-3: AESIDEN,
TIAL OFFICE HERITAGE CONSERVATION OVERLAY DISTRICT
TO ADDITIONAL PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE "J.W.
WARNER HOUSE," LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 111
SOUTHWEST 5TH AVENUE, (MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED HEREIN); MAKING FINDINGS; AND 13Y MAK,
iNG ALL THE NECESSARY CHANGES ON PAGE NO.36 OF
SAID ZONING ATLAS; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVI-
SION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE,
ORDINANCE NO.9952
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDI-
NANCE NO.9500, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLAS-
SIFICATION OF.APPROXIMATELY 2210 SOUTHWEST 16TH
STREET AND APPROXIMATELY 1600-02 SOUTHWEST 22ND
AVENUE, MIAMI;, FLORIDA, (MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED HEREIN) FROM RS•212 ONE FAMILY DETACHED
RESIDENTIAL TO CR•1f7 COMMERCIAL•RESIDENTIAL
(NEIGHBORHOOD) BY MAKING FINDINGS; AND BY MAK-
ING'ALL THE NECESSARY CHANGES ON, PAGE NO.39 OF
SAID ZONING ATLAS MADE A PART OF ORDINANCE NO.
9500 BYREFERENCEAND DESCRIPTION 'iN'AATICLE 3,
SECTION 300,THEREOF; CONTAINING'AREPEALER PRO-
VISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE.
ORDINANCE NO.9953
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF ORDINANCE
NO.9500, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI,
FLORIDA, BY AMENDING ARTICLE 15 ENTITLED."SPI: SPE-
CIAL PUBLIC INTEREST DISTRICTS,", BY ADDING ANEW
SECTION 15170 ENTITLED "SPI.17: SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE
OVERLAY DISTRICT," AND ASSOCIATED NEW SECTIONS
15171_THRU 15173; PROVIDING FOR INTENT, EFFECT, AND
CLASS C SPECIAL PERMIT REQUIREMENT; AND
CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERABIL-
ITY CLAUSE.
ORDINANCE NO, 9W
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDI-
NANCE NO.9500, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF:THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, BY REMOVING THE SPI-3, COCONUT
AREA GENERALLY BOUNOEo GY n
RANGING FROM APPROXIMATELY 11
OF AND PARALLEL TO'TIGERTAIL A
NUE, AND TIGERTAIL'AVENUE,' (0
DESCRIBED HEREIN); MAKING :FIN
ING ALL THE NECESSARY CHANGE
OF SAID ZONING ATLAS; CONTAINI
VISION AND A SEVERABILTY CtAL
'w[fwl\I•�IAC \IA'
ITRICT FROM THE
Y STREET, A' LINE
D:200 FEET -SOUTH:
UEi AVIATION AVE- .
E;PARTICULARLY
GS; AND BY MAK ;-
N _PAGES N01'46 46
A REPEALER PRO-
T'OF. �RQiNANCE' ! .
ORDINANCE NO. ggtt3
It a
In
said MIAMI MOVIOW And 6
a, In Said C6U
160606tMIAMI has h6toldbid@f6to b,
Add CdiffifV, P16tida'fisch
0061 Hbildfigh) dhdhhi bi
lififfet df f a post 6ffI64
ida. 10 6 nitiod of dm6 9
11uh of fh@* AffiAhod 660Y
it be" thAt §hG hah halt
tt dt 06fodtaftaf, any dIjc6(
;JpI`p6§@ of tocutifig I
A . 68 ai
'0 0
69WOM IA find 6ubbe 6d"�1561offi ins this
"
1st e
... day ot ..... .. D. 10.85
.........
S .4-Hai'
IS' 'Notary PublIa, Slh
'oitt.01ot"i'da At Large
(SEAL) ��0,-bl
My commission axjfik b; 0 ,"
1111tijittO,
M R 144
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ttXt OF Ohb1NANJbt
NO, 0900. tHt 20NING ORDINANCE OF tHt WY OF MIAMI,
FLORIDA, BY AMENDING ANtIOLt It ENI`ItLtb -180i-.815t.
CIAL PUBLIC iNftAtSt b18fMI&S,1- BY ADDING ANtW
SECTION 16176 tNtItLtb "8PIAY: SOUTH 8AYSHOAt OpIivt
OVERLAY bISTRIOf,*1 AND AgtoCiAttb NEW SPt;TIONt
16111 tHAU 16173; PROVIDING FOR INTtNf, fiPPtOT, AND
CLASS b SPECIAL PERMIT REQUIREMENT; AND
CONTAINING A AtPtALtk PROVISION AND A StV0A9IL-
[TY CLAUSE.
ORDINANCE NO. 0064
ORM MAJOR MEETS OVERLAY DIM10t FROM THE
AM OtfdAALLY'ftbUNDtb 11Y MAMY STREET A LINE
RANGING FROM APPROXIMATELY 100 TO W FEE `SOUTH
OF AND PARALLEL TO TIMATAIL AMA AVIATION AVE,
WE, ANb TIGEATAIL AVENUE, ( OAt PAI'IMULAhLY
DESCRIBED HEREIN); MAKING FINDINGS, AND BY MAR-
INO ALL THE NECESSARY CHANGES "ON PALM NO. 44
OF SAID ZONING ATLAS; CONTAINING A REPEALER PA04
VISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE.
OFIbINANCP- NO. 0066
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TW OF ORDINANCE
NO. M, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY'OF MIAMI,
FLORIDA 13Y AMEWINO, SUBSECTION 615A TO DELETE
AN ERRONEOUS RtFtAtNCt, SECTION W TO PERMIT
CERTAIN � FACILITIES IN PLANNEb DEVELOPMENT big,
TAICTS, sugatefioNs 1312.6 To OLAAI" LANGUAGE
PERTAINING TO LIGHT PLANIES,, SECTION 1888 TO CLAR-
IFY OFF-STREET PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS SUBe
SECTIONS MA.1 AND 2060A 11 TO CLARIFY LANGUAGE
RELATIVE TO VARIATIONS TO FLOORAAFA RATIOS XNb
OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS; SUBSECTIONS WA TO
CLARIFY LANGUAGE PERTAINING TO HOME OCCUPATIONS,
2008.&1 TO CLARIFY. RESTRICTIONS APPLICABLE TO MUL-
TIPLE FAMILY DISTRICTS, 2102.1 TO INCLUDE ONE -FAMILY
SEMI-DETACHED, TWO-FAMILY DETACHED, MULTIPLE
DWELLINGS AND ADDING NEW LANGUAGE PERTAINING
TO THE USE OF NONCONFORMING LOTS, 2102.1.1 TO
PROVIDE FOR CLASS C SPECIAL PERMITS FOR USES EQUIV-
ALENT TO ONE -FAMILY SEMI-DETACHED;TWO-FAMILY
DETACHED, AND MULTIPLE DWELLINGS, 2510.2.3 TO CLAR-
IFY HEIGHT AND LIGHT PLANES, 2510.3.2 TO PROVIDE
FOR NOTICE, 2510.2.3 TO CLARIFY HEIGHT AND LIGHT
PLANES, 2510.3.2 TO PROVIDE FOR NOTICE; AND.SEC-
TION 3004 PERTAINING TO NOTICE REQUIREMENTS, SUB.
SECTION 3101,11 TO PROHIBIT FLOOR AREA RATIO VARI-
ANCES, A
ANCES, AND 3602TO CHANGE THE DEFINITION OF '*AM-
46wm it-Y"; FURTHER, BY AMENDING T"t OFFICIAL' SCHEDULE
OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS: PAGE 2, BY ADDING "RESI-
DENTIAL" TO THE TITLE OF TABLES 1 AND 2; PAGE 3, BY
ADDING "NON-RESIDENTIAL" TO THE TITLE OF TABLES 3
AND 4; AND PAGE 4, CR-2, COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL
(COMMUNITY), PERMISSIBLE ONLY BY SPECIAL PERMIT
AND CR-3, PERMISSIBLE GENERALLY, BY APPLYING THE
PROVISIONS TO "NEW" AUTOMOBILES; CONTAINING A
REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE.
ORDINANCE NO. 9956
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING.THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDI-
NANCE i NO. 9500, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OFTHE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, BY: CHANGING'THE ZONING CLAS-
SIFICATION OF THE AREA GENERALLY BOUNDED BY
SOUTHWEST 27THAVENUE'(GRAPeLAND BOULEVARD), A
LINE APPROXIMATELY 100 SOUTH D PARAL-
LEL
LEL TO, TIGERTAIL'AYgNUIE4, A V1 ATIO UES AND
TIGERTAIL AVENUE,,. PER PLA ONFILE *.DEPART-
MENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING BOARDS-ADMINISTRAr
TION (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED. HEREIN); FROM
RG-215', GENERAL RESIDENTIAL TO R04/6.;'HESIDENTIAL
OFFICE; MAKING FINDINGS; AND BY MAKING'ALCTHE
NECESSARY CHANGES ON PAGES NO. 45 AND 46. OF
SAID ZONING ATLAS; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVI-
SION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE,
ORDINANCE NO. 9957
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE I ZONING ATLjkiOFORDI-
NANCE NO, 9500. THE ZONING ORDINANCE,OFTHE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, 13Y APPLYING THE $PI;17 SOUTH
BAYSHORE DRIVE OVERLAY DISTRICT TO THE AREA GEN-
ERAI.LY. BOUNDED BY MCFARLANE ROAD,' ' SOUTH
BAYSHORF DRIVE, A LINE APPROXIMATELY 2W , FEET EAST
OF, AND PARALLEL TO. AVIATION AVENUE (9XGLUDING
THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF AVIATION AND TIGERTAIL
COMPRISED OF AN AREA 100' ALONG AVIATION, AND
150' ALONG TIGERTAIL. AVEN
UE), TIGERTAIL AVENUE, MARY
STREET, GRAND AVENUE, AND A LINE APPROXIMATELY
250 FEET WEST OF, AND PARALLEL TO MARY STREET., TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING, (MORE PARTICULARLY
i 11W A" TMt- Nt9F,§§ARY 9MAN9F,$ ON PAGES NO, 45
AND 40OF S.AIPZ0NIN0ATW.;-CPNTAWJN0A R r;P6ALfR
PROVISION AND A WF_RADILITY CLAUSE,
RALPH 0. ON019
CITY:CLr;RK
QITY OF MIAMI, FWRIDA'
P011941119P Qf 016 N911cp on the 1, 411y'at fewow low
I
ph6tograph
Viev frcn peacock pack shwing
t-raffic, parkitig conditions,
etc o (MdFatlatd)
9953
Photograph (C-3/4)-21:
View of Peacock Park
activity for the Coconut
Grove Food and Music
Festival, Sunday, January 13,
1985. Time 4:30 p.m.
9953
Photograph (B-17/21)-1
Grove Food
Coconut-d and
Music Festival Bayshore
Drive
-9 5 R
..........
P, 7L�
PPO
lit
Photograph (A-8/29)-2t
Photograph
lockitig south oar
8M, 27th Avenue at Day
Avenue.
L49 5 3
Photograph (A-2/30)-3:
View on S.W. 27th Avenue
showing westerly right-of-
way and private property
just north of Greenway.
9
Photograph (A-1/32)-4;
View M. S.W. 27th Avemme
and Greenway Road shaving
Kolisch Property.
MAN
'YNr"^StT•R4+!•PkVF&!'�f✓"y. f'�•N t•F a,4.
.,.+,.S..e
4
rM. �� n
�
1
•2'3�
• . � �•�.�- pia _ '� >�..�;� 1 *"
j
•• � ......� {�'� ram
a;w•r„�
IW •.
? shy.\ •
�: far � �•• -� � '• -
' �• 1 a
'�• Y «• y� � �F ]]]irlrr'111 •A
-F/ i�' ! t iy D •2
1 M •^ Y �� � 1', � !� t.-' `{yam,
_ �.�tif '. ► -. �f l", l � P.:. "z4 y��'�• �l Irjiii �j—�� �1[I��
13
J� --
Photograph (A-7/31)-5:
Vi'eW fraft S.W. 27th Avetwe
sh ' * liqch Property
C'm westerly right-of-way
of Bayshore Drive
99 5 q
Photograph (A-3/33)-6:
View looking west on Green -
way Road dissecting the
Kolisch Property. Cornelia
Drive at end of road.
99 5 R
Photograph (B-4/8)-Il;
Vie -.w of Coconut Grove Bank
-
parking lot,
9953
- - -- ------
Y.
•r.
- W `. #0
"' � �� rr ' ,�i�"� 1 — , �� `�v mac;�✓`? y �— _ ,
e
r ,
pp1
r
.i� � _"`v 'fir• " � r � „�?�� � ��
photograph ($-13/17)-12.
View looking north on
13ayshore Drive ishMitlg
autawbiie parking on
Median north to Darwin
Street,
99 5 013
photograph (B-12/16)-13:
View from median at S.W. 27th
Avenue and Bayshore Drive show
ing parking throughout Ken Meyers
park, and parking on median strip
in center of Bayshore Drive.
99C;Cj
R
I I �
Photograph (t-3/7)-10!
Vices frm 3-a Cornell Drive
looking south shoring
Coconut Grove Batik property,
and Convention Center parking
lot (background).
9953
Photograph (A-4/35)-9:
View on Cornelia Drive
south to Bayshore and
the Coconut Grove Bank
property.
o*
1
`
if l�,t�. ♦
�
'
r.
....,,�� ��• o'
` �� � �
photograph (A-5/30-7.,
View otj Conelia Drive
at Gteetway looking
South.
9953
Photograph (B-20/24)-16:
Couple pushing Toyota automo-
bile into traffic On South
Bayshore Drive from median area.
NOTE: Toyota was left in the
middle of Bayshore Drive while
the couple backed the (brawn)
Mazda truck off the parking
median and left the area.
995.9
M
Photograph (B-19/23)-17-.
Vie _w sbaAng Toyota automobile
left on Bayshore, Drive, and
couple leaving in Mazda pick -
UP truck.
K Q
�I wool" 11 P I
Vi
L -777 7 77 7 .7 7'
'7
Ell
k s!" •. r r •. .
'i r4R1
r
i
ems- _.�� � � �'''�•:
E
1
r,
h
. •��,1 Cf'fq�• � s r
f
f
r. •ih
'�.. if.
Wit,. '; - >f • '
Photograph (0-7/8)-18!
Viev shcwitig traffic build-up
due to car being pushed out
and stopped on Bayshore Drive,
and cars parked on median,
9953
Photograph (B-16/20)-15:
View from Grove Towers shaving
traffic, parking in median strip
in front of Mutiny, and parking
situation in Ken Meyers Park.
9 915 R
I