HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem #22 - First Reading OrdinanceJ-85-216
2/26/85
ORDINANCE NO.
,;,x��° V H[V VKUltVHLVI.G HrtGLvultvV tnG lr,nl vc WLNWXL\LLLrY
NO. 9500, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
s, MIAMI, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING ARTICLE 15
ENTITLED "SPI: SPECIAL PUBLIC INTEREST
DISTRICTS" BY AMENDING SUBSECTION 15165.3.1
ENTITLED "SPI-16: FLOOR AREA LIMITATIONS, '
RESTRICTIONS ON NON-RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA"
(SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST COMMERCIAL
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT), BY PROVIDING FOR
INCREASED MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIOS; CON-
TAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVER-
" ABILITY CLAUSE.
WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting
of February 20, 1985, Item No. 10, following an advertised
hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 21-85, by a 6 to 1 vote,
RECOMMENDING DENIAL of amending Ordinance No. 9500, as herein-
after set forth; and
WHEREAS, a separate motion to recommend to the City Commis-
sion that consideration be given to applying SPI-7 type floor
area ratios to the subject project garnered a 4 to 3 vote "for",
thus, failing to obtain the vote necessary for a recommendation
to the City Commission; and
WHEREAS, an additional motion was successfully passed to
inform the Commission of the failure of the Planning Advisory
Board to recommend increased permissible floor area ratios for
the subject area to those presently permitted in the SPI-7:
Brickell-Miami River Rapid Transit Commercial Residential
District; and
WHEREAS, the "9500 Blue Ribbon Committee," appointed by the
City Commission through Commission Resolutions 84-1304 and
84-1321, recommend the amendments to Ordinance No. 9500, as
hereinafter set forth:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The text of Ordinance No. 9500, the Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, is hereby amended by
amending Article 15 of said Zoning Ordinance follows:l
"Article 15. SPI: SPECIAL PUBLIC INTEREST DISTRICTS
Section 15160. SPI-16, 16.1, 16.2: Southeast Over-
town/Park West Commercial Residential
Districts.
Section 15165. MINIMUM LOT REQUIREMENTS; FLOOR AREA
LIMITATIONS.
ri
15165.3. SPI-16, 16.1, 16.2: Floor Area Limita-
tions.
Floor Area Limitations for SPI-16, 16.1 and 16.2
shall be as follows subject to the limitations and
requirements of Section 2000.1.
15165.3.1. SPI-16: Floor Area Limitations, Restric-
tions on Non-residential Floor Area.
1. The maximum floor area for a mixed use
building shall not exceed 370 4.32 times the
gross land area.
2. The maximum floor area for a residential use
shall not exceed 2-6 4.32 times the gross
land area.
3. The maximum floor area for non-residential
use shall not exceed 674 1.72 times the gross
land area, provided, however, that non-resi-
dential use shall be permissible only in a
mixed use building where at least three
one -and -one-half square feet of non-resi-
entia use s a 1 be provided for every one
square foot of non-residential use."
Section 2. This Ordinance shall be returned to this
Commission two (2) years subsequent to its adoption.
Section 3. All Ordinances, Code Sections, or parts
thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed insofar as they
are in conflict.
Section 4. Should any part or provision of this Ordi-
nance be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be
invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance
as a whole.
1
Words and/or figures stricken through shall be deleted.
Underscored words and/or figures shall be added. The
remaining provisions are now in effect and remain unchanged.
Asterisks indicate omitted and unchanged material.
-2-
PASSED AND ADOPTED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this 28th—
day of F r ary , 1985.
PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND READING BY TITLE ONLY this
day of , 1985.
Mayor
ATTEST: _
1
RALPH G. ONGIE
City Clerk I
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
l.
C
-4 azl�- d'O L E . MAXW
A sistant Ci
AP
LUCIA. A. DDU
City Attorney
JEM/WPC/pb/391
W
orney
RM AND CORRECTNESS:
0*�
22 CITY OF MIA ' Mg. FLORWA
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
To.
Randolph B. Rosencrantz DATE: January 23, 1985 MUL
City Manager
SUBJECT: Recommendations of Blue
7 Ribbon Committee
F Ift? 0 M:
e Rodriguez, Director REFERENCESt City Commission Agenda:
Planning
anning Department
ENCLOSURESt January 24, 1985
Per Motions 84-1304 and 1321; November 15,
1984, the recommendations of the Blue Ribbon
Committee, appointed by the CommiMon to
review and make recommendations on certain
proposed amendments to Zoning Ordinance 9500,
are attached.
Per Motion 84-1321; November 15, 19840 the Commission appointed a
Blue Ribbon Committee composed of Guillermo Freixas, Chairman;
Janet Cooper; Hank Greene; Ron Frazier and Tony Marina.
Per Motion 84-1304; November 15, 1984, the Committee was directed
to review nine proposed amendments to Zoning Ordinance 9500. The
amendments include proposed changes to the zoning text:
4i.
Amendment F, Amendment L, "Wild Animals", SPI-15: Southeast
Overtown/Park West Overlay District, and SPI-16, 16.1, and 16.2:
Southeast Overtown/Park West Commercial Residential Districts.
Also to be reviewed were the Southeast Overtown/Park West related
zoning Atlas changes which would apply the SPI-15 Overlay I the
SPI -169 16.1 and 16.2 Districts to the area; in addition, the
Blue Ribbon Committee was asked to review "Design Guidelines and
Standards - Southeast Overtown/Park West."
A14
The Committee met on January 11, 141 and 23, 1985, to discuss the
amendments and make their recommendations. The Committee
formulated recommendations on all items except for two Sections
of Amendment F. They intend to address these items on their
February 4th meeting. Attached are the Committee
recommendations 83 summarized by the Planning Department. The
Committee requests that the City Commission consider
incorporating all recommendations as a part of 2nd Reading for
the amendments reviewed and that the City Commission postpone
voting only on that portion of Amendment F in which
recommendatron3 have yet to be formulated 3POOM0411y
Article 28 and Transitional Uses for RO d13triQt3.
It is requested that this item be entered on the City CoMML33iOn
agenda of January 24, 1985.
3R/JWM/dr
, % .. • .
9500 Blue Ribbon Committee Recommendations
Proposed Amendment L a. SPI-3 portion Although already
approved on 2nd Reading, the
Committee recommends that the
City Commission instruct the
Planning Department to review the
RO-3 district carefully when
conducting their proposed SW 27th
Avenue Study.
b. Reduction of Transitional Use
Area for Specified Uses in and
CG Districts should requIrg
Special Exception and —in ali
Instances a 10 foot landscape
buffer (minimum) sou l d be
maintained. The orIginal
amendmentp as proposed, -allows
for a reduction to 20 feet from
district boundary with Class C
Special Permit for specified uses
adjacent to residential
districts. The Committee
3Ugge3ted Speclal Excentlon
because :It would rovMe notice
to adjacent property owners wHere
Glass G would not and it Was e
that notice 13 very import'ant.
c. Interim Parking Lots - Committee
voted to uphold the proposed
amendment, as written.
2. Wild Animals Ordinance Committee recommends that the
proposed amendment be r e v I —se to
control any P013onou"i animari—or
reptiles in all-dition to all Ciat3 I -I
wild animals in residential districts
or those districts permitting
residential uses.
3. SPI-15 Zoning Text Amendment
The Committee recommends that the
following changes be incorporated to
the proposed amendments:
15165.3. SPI-16, 16. ly 16.2:
Floor Area Limitations.
Floor area limitations for SPI-16,
16.11 16.2 shall be as follows
subject to the limitations and
requirements of Section 2000.1.
15165.3.1. SPI-16: Floor Area
Limitations, Restrictions
on Nonresidential FlooF
Area.
1. The maximum floor area for a
mixed use building shall not
exceed }@ 4.32 times the the
gross land area.
2. The maximum floor area for
residential buidlin s wze. shall
not exceed 4. 3Z times the
gross land area.
3. The maximum floor area for
nonresidential use shall not
exceed 0-.4 1.T2 times the gross
land area, provided however, that
nonresidential use shall be
permissible only in a mixed use
building where at least three•
one -and -one-half square feet of
residential use shall be provided
for every one square foot of
nonresidential use.
15165.3.2. SPI-16.1: Floor Area
Limitations, xcept ons.
1. The maximum floor area for a
mixed use building shall not
exceed +.-a 5.0 times gross land
area.
2. The maximum floor area for
residential buildin s use shall
not exceed Mimes. gross
land area.
3. Except as modified by Section
15165.3.2.1 below, nonresidential
use shall not exceed +. 2.0
times the gross land area.
15165.3.2.1. SPI-16.1: Allowable
ncrease n onres en -
al rldbrsArdt ror e
rov s on-o ns a or
2
ri
u.
4
Proposed Amendment F
Offsite Residential
Use.
1. For every square foot of
residential use provided either
onsite in a mixed use buildingor
offs1te within e boundaries o
the SPI-15 district and
concurrently w1th nonres ent_ a
use,
dt3t.t_t; the non-residential
floor area shall be increased by
one square foot, provided,
however, that the maximum
increase in floor area shall not
exceed *-.& 3.0 times the gross
land area. maximum total non-
residential Floor Area Ratio
shall not exceed 3-.-e 5.0. of the
SPI-16.1 site.
In addition, the Committee noted
that if the sports and arena
complex is developed between
North 6th and 8th Streets, the
SPI-16.2 district should be
extended to include the complex
and the Urban Design Standards
and Guidelines THould be modirled
o e er n egrate the complex
into the overall redevelopment
program for the Overtown/Park
West area.
1. Reference to "rules of the
Department of Planning" s
deleted* (e c o n 515.1)
Approved, as presented.
2. In PD-H Districts, certain
facilitiest n a ditionn Ed -
principal and accessory
structures, would be permitted
provided the proposed
development was not already
convententi served -b ex
ac es outside I t fte propose
eve opmO t. (3tatton 6O6)
Approved, as presented.
a
+^
3. "Ima inar " planes are
clarified as being "light"
planes. (Section 612.6)
Approved, as presented.
4. In the SPI-6 District, the
offstreet parking requirements
are clarified to state that
multi -family buildings shall
provide not less than .5
offstreet parking spaces per
dwelling unit. (Section 1568)
Approved, as presented.
5. In proposed developments which
combine rest ent a and non-
residential uses, the
computation for floor area
ratio, livability, pedestrian
open space and total open space
are clarified.
(Section 2000.1.1, 2000.1.2.1)
Approved, as presented.
6. For home occu ations, ttie
numberpersons is limited to
2, one of whom is resident on
The premises. A provision that
disqualified space built within
2 years of an application is,
deleted -A- -list— home
occ`cuup�ations is substituted for
a list not considered to be
home occupations.
(Section 2003.5)
Approved, as presented.
7. Offstre�et parking permitted in
certain era areas is clarified
as applying In multi -family
districts. (Section
App ovei as presented.
8. For nonconformin lots, a
prov s on 13 -added at allows
one-famii semi-detached two -
am a ac a we n s an
mu a we n s as we_ as
o� am y e ,ao ed dweilinga
In appropriate districts if the
lot mets 80 Beria t .Qt t4o..
minimum lot requ relent, eqd
other requirements of the
4
J•-85-264
40
to
zoning district.
(Section 2102.1, 2102.1.1)
Approved, with recommendation
to add to the end of Section
2102.1.(2) ". . .provided that
such use is otherwise permitted
in the district."
9. For Class C permits requested
for the preservation of natural
or archeological features
height envelope li. lane
regulations may also be
relaxed. Notice requirements
to adjacent property owners are
simplified; written objections
from adjacent property owners
are to be considered.
(Section 2510.2.3, 2510.29 2510
.3.2)
Approved, with recommendation
to correct numbering sequence
by changing 2510.2 to 2510.3.2.
10. For Major Use Special Permits,
the permitting process s
simplified by eliminating
review of preliminary
applications before the
lanning AaV13ory Board and
City Commission. The
application . of standards
provides greater exi it ty;
"public need" is eliminated as
a standard to be replaced by
"Public welfare." The Planning
Director s to review final
construction documents
(Article 28)
Will take up at February 4th
Meeting.
11. For Appeals from the Decisions
of the zoning m n s rat r or
Director or Flannin
e
e artmnt, no ce requ_remen s
or theappeal hearing before
the Zoning Board is to include
persons who have written a
request to be note
_eo on 3004)
Approved, as presented; In
addition, ®embers of the
. 5 •
i
Committee individually
recommended that the process be
reviewed by which zoning
interpretations by the Zoning
Administrator are handled,
disseminated, and how they come
into effect.
12. Variances for floor area ratios
are to be pro ibited.
(Section 3101.1)
Approved, as presented.
13. The definition of family is
modified to Include members
related by blood, marriage or
adoption plus 3 rather than -'T
unrelatedper-sons; a provision
're at ng to -- -roomers or less
is deleted. (Section 3602)
Approved with recommendation to
clarify language by changing
text to the following:
Family: A family is one or
more persons occupying a single
dwelling or lodging unit,
provided that unless all
members are related by blood,
marriage, or adoption; in
addition such family shall nol
contain over three
unrelated persona -(inctuditig
14. For the Residential Office
Districts, (HO-1 through -
new side and rear transitional
requirements are added if in
r�ox mi� t -To single and two
familX districts -,
an -
Vill take up at February. U
Meeting.
15• In the CR-2 and CR-3 districts,
under uses permitted genera My,
the sales of new, rather than
used automobiles motorcycles,
etc. is olarified.
Approved, as presented.
I
6 '
i
-0