Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutO-09970J-84-920 3/25/85 ORDINANCE NO, 9970 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE NO, 9500, THE; ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE AREAS GENERALLY BOUNDED BY NORTHWEST LOTH STREET, NORTH MIAMI AVENUE, NORTHWEST 8TH STREET, NORTHWEST 2ND AVENUE/ NORTHWEST 3RD AVENUE AND NORTHWEST 7TH STREET (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN), FROM CG-2/7 GENERAL COMMERCIAL, RG-3/6 GENERAL RESIDENTIAL, RG-3/7 GENERAL RESIDENTIAL, AND CR-3/7 COMMERCIAL RESI- DENTIAL TO SPI-16: SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL, DISTRICT, EXCLUDING THE EXISTING PR ZONING; MAKING FINDINGS; ANTS BY MATING ALL THE NECESSARY CHANGES ON PAGES NO. 23 AND 36 OF SAID ZONING ATLAS MADE A PART OF ORDINANCE NO. 9500, BY REFERENCE AND DESCRIPTION IN ARTICLE 3, SECTION 300 THEREOF; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE: WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of September 5, 1984, Item No. 4, following an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 95-84, by a 5 to 1 vote, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of a change of zoning classification, as hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, the City Commission after careful consideration of this matter deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami and its inhabitants to grant this change of zoning classification as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The Zoning Atlas of Ordinance No. 9500, the zoning ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, is hereby amended by changing the zoning classification of the areas generally bounded by Northwest loth Street, North Miami Avenue, Northwest 8th Street, Northwest 2nd Avenue, Northwest 3rd Avenue and Northwest 7th Street, more particularly described as Blocks 24N, 25N, 37N, and 46N of MIAMI NORTH (A-. L. KNOWLTON B-41), G.C. BOLLES SUBDIVISION (1-16), and Flock 36N of P.W. WHITES RE -SUB (B-r34), of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, from CO-2/7 Geheral Corttmercial, RG-3/6 General Residential, R(3-3/7 General Retidentialp and CR-3/7 Commercial Residential to SPI-16 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARR WEST COMMERCIAL R8810ENTIAL D1STRIM excluding the existing PR zoning. Section 2. It is hereby found that this zoning classi- fication change: (a) Is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan; (b) Is not contrary to the established land use pattern; (c) Will not create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts; (d) Is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the City; (e) Would not materially alter the population density pattern or increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilities, streets, etc.; (f) Is necessary due to changed or changing conditions; (g) Will not adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood; (h) Will not create or excessively increase traffic congestion or otherwise affect public safety; (i) will not create a drainage problem; (i) Will not seriously reduce light and air to adjacent area; (k) Will not adversely affect property values in the adjacent area; (1) Will not be a deterrent to the improvement or develop- ment of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations; (m) Will not constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with protection of the public welfare; Section 3. Pages No. 23 and 36 of the Zoning Atlas, made a part of Ordinance No. 9500 by reference and description in Article 3, Section 300 or said Ordinance, are hereby amended to reflect the changes made necessary by these amendments. Section 4, All ordinances, code sections, or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed insofar as they are in conflict. "2,w C Section 5. Should any part or provision of this Otdi- trance be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be inv alidt the same shall not affect the validity of the ordinance as a whole. PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this 20th day of Decembett 1984. PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL HEADING BY TITLE ONLY this day of March, j 19856 Maurice A. Ferre TEST: MAURICE A. FERREt Mayor RAL G. ONGIE ity Clerk PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: Z / Al 56 6W t1T0p,L E. MAXWELL A sistant City Attorney APPWVED AS, TO f ORV1 AND CORRECTNESS: LUCIA A. DUU ERTY City Attorne l Clerk of the City of Miami, Florida, hcrch% c.«.f tify that on tile ...... /,day of,.,., JEM/Wpc/ab/342 �. i'). 19 flp a full, true anii c.,rl-crt ca y (,f the ab�,ve aft.' .01%"OhIg 0.6inallce wal, 1)ODIe.d ;It ti1C •`x)tltil Voor t)i iil. Dakic County Court litr,:,e nt rile I)I::c: p;utiid d for nutia_s anu puh.ica:iuns by attaching said c;,ijy to the ;;Ia,% I)roviJed thelcior. WITNLSS my ;rind and the official seal of said City this...cX/.... day oi:......... A. D 19•.8'� ity Clerk A3- Howard V. Gary DATE! September 20, 1984 FILE: City Manager sue,Ecz ORDINANCE - RECOMMEND APPROVAL AREA GENERALLY BOUNDED BY NW & NE 11 ST, NW b NE 2 AVE, NW & NE 7 ST, g Y N MIAMI AVE & I-95, ,�•' 1 E. ne AEFSRENCES+ Director Planning and Zoning Boards COMMISSION AGENDA - OCTOBER 25, 1984 Administration Department=""o5uRE5: PLANNING AND ZONING ITEMS It is recommended by the Planning Advisory Board that an amendment to the Official Zoning Atlas o Zoning 9500, as amended, by changing the zoning classification from CG-1/7 General Commercial, CG-2/7 General Commercial, RG-3/6 General Residential, RG-3/7 General Residential, CR-3/7 Commercial Residential, CR-2/7 Commercial Residential to the proposed SPI-16 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, excluding the existing PR, Parks and Recreation, zoning for the areas generally bounded by NW & NE 11 Street, NW and NE 2 Avenue, NW and NE 7 Street,. North Miami Avenue aner--N be approved. The Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of September 5, 1984, Item 4, following an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution PAB 95-84 by a 5 to 1 vote; recommending approval an amendment to the Official Zoning Atlas of Zoning Ordinance 9500, as amended, by changing the zoning classification for the areas generally bounded by NW and NE 11th.Street, NE 2nd Avenue, NW and NE 8th Street, and I-95, excluding existing PR zoning and NE 8th Street, NE 2nd Avenue, NE 7th Street and North Miami Avenue and NW 8th Street, NW 2nd, Avenue, NW`7th Street and I-95, from CG-1/7 General Commercial, CG-2/7 General Commercial, RG-3/6 General Residential, RG-3/7 General Residential, CR-3/7 Commercial Residential, CR--2/7 Commercial Residential to the proposed SPI-16 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, excluding the existing PR zoning. Seven objections received in the mail; eight replies in favor received in the mail. Backup information is included for your review, An ORDINANCE to provide for the above has been prepared by the City Attorneys Office and submitted for consideration of the City Commission, AEPL.111 cc Law Department MOTE; Planning Department recommends; APPROYAL Y'; lot i PLANNING FACT SHEET APPLICANT City of 141ami Southeast-- Overt-own/Park 'West Redevelopment Project Office: • June 19, - 1Q84. PETITION 4. AREAS GENERALLY .BOUNDED .,BY.• N.,W.. AND :N.,E.. 11TH ..._ N.L. t, N.W. AND N.E. and N.E. 8TH STREET, N.E. 2ND AVENUE, N.E. 7TH STREET AND NORTH MIAMI AVENUE; and N -W. .8TH STREET, _.N-W. . 2ND .AVENUE,.. N.W..::7TH STREET AND I-95. Change ofIzoning classification in the Official Zoning Atlas of Zoning Ordinance 9500, as amended, from CG-1/7 (General Commercial),, CG-2/7 (General Commercial), RG-3I6 (General Residential), RG-3/7 (General Residential), CR-3/7 (Commercial Residential), CR-2/7 (Commercial Residential) to the proposed SPI-15 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST COPV4ERC'iAL s' RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, excluding the existing PR j. k zoning. i REQUEST To provide the SPI-15, Southeast Overtown/Park Jest Commercial Residential District, in order to allow redevelopment consistent with the Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Plan. ANALYSIS This new district, primarily multifamily residential and- commercial, will promote and encourage multifamily residential occupancy, either in separate buildings or in combination with office and supporting retail and service uses. RECOMMENDATIONS PLANNING DEPT, Approval. PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD Deferred by a vote of 6 to n, from the Planning Advisory Board meeting of duly 11., 1.9$4, to the meeting of September,$, 1984, Continued by a vote of 7 to O, from the Planning Advisory Beard meeting of duly 16, 1984, to the meeting of September S, 1954. A f'. P Item '9 9 . i a4 Vey �4 ciN .. ,. � � .. .. .... �. . W-.�..�.J Ali. u6 �! r#. 4 . �.• YtW:A"�Sfwil�i'.•�_r'A�li�t i4' — 7�MMAt51Wii Y�.wi '�.�.r �T%�!!M�ii�1�' t'.65.1��=;. , ... i,... .- .. ..• ♦hew.. '++.�Y.^!�r+.ar'ni+y!�+rw�+�+.. � �`J �� p. ... a i i PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD Deferred by a vote of. 6_ to 0, from. the .Pllanning.. Advisory Board meeting of July 11, 1984, to the meeting of September 5, 1984. Continued by a vote -of 7­to Oi~from-the Planning - '~�! r •`` Advisory Board meeting -of. July. 18.,. 1984, ..to•.•the., ,:_ ._..... meeting of September 5,_1984. At its meeting of September 59- 1984, the Planning Advisory Board adopted Resolution PAB 95-84 by a 5 to 1 vote, recommending approval of the above. CITY COMMISSION PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD CITY COMMISSION At its meeting of October 25, 1984, the City_ , Commission continued action -an the above. At its meeting- of - November • 15; - 1984; this item ~�w was continued to December 20, 1984., At its meeting of December 5, 1984, the -Planning Advisory Board adopted Resolution PAB 122-84 by a 5 to 1 vote, recommending approval -of the above. - At its meeting of December 20, 1984, the City Commission passed the above on First Reading. At its meeting of January 24, 1985, the City Commission continued ,action .on the above •to. i•ts..... meeting of February 28, 1985. At its meeting of February 28, 1985, the City. Commission continued action on the above. ""A 9 =M� Lai I !Lj Ln zn Fff, 1 4 RG-2/6 ZJ et SOUTHEAST OVERTOWNk/ DR CR :217- :6u41;yT.:Y G City OP MIAMI; FLORMA INTER-OPPICC MEMORANbUM Randolph B. Rosencrantz City Manager FnoM: a Rodriguez) Director Planning Department DATE: January 23, 1985 F,Lit, SUBJECT., Recommendations of Blue Ribbon Committee REFERENCES: City Commission, Agenda: ENCLOSURES: January 24, 1985 Per Motions 84-1304 and 1321; November 15, 1984, the recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Committee, appointed by .the Commission to review and make recommendations on certain proposed amendments to Zoning Ordinance 9500, are attached. Per Motion 84-1321; November 15, 1984, the Commission appointed a Blue Ribbon Committee composed of Guillermo Freixas, Chairman; Janet Cooper; Hank Greene; Ron Frazier and Tony Marina. Per Motion 84-1304; November 15, 1984, the Committee was directed to"review nine proposed amendments to Zoning Ordinance 9500. The amendments include proposed changes to the zoning text: Amendment F, Amendment. L, "Wild Animals",. SPI-15: .....Southe.ast Overtown/Park West Overlay District, and SPI-16, 16.1, and 16.2: Southeast Overtown/Park West Commercial Residential Districts. Also to be reviewed were the Southeast Overtown/Park West related zoning Atlas changes which would apply the SPI-15 Overlay., the SPI-16, 16.1 and 16.2 Districts to the area; in addition, the Blue Ribbon Committee was asked to review "Design Guidelines and Standards - Southeast Overtown/Park West." The Committee met on January 11, 14, and 23, 1985, to discuss the amendments and mare their recommendations. The Committee formulated recommendations on all items except for two Sections of Amendment F. They intend to address these items on their February 4th meeting. Attached are the Committee' recommendations, as summarized by the Planning Department. The Committee requests that the City Commission consider incorporating all recommendations as a part of 2nd Reading for the amendments reviewed and that the City Commission postpone voting only on that portion of Amendment F in which reoommen W3 sve yet to be formulated - specifically Article 28 and Transitional Uses for RQ districts. It is requested that this item be entered on the City Commission agenda ofJanuary 24, 1965,' 9500 Blue Ribbon Committee Recommendations 1. proposed Amendment L a. SPI-•3 portion - Although already approved on 2nd Reading, the Committee recommends that the City Commission instruct the Planning Department to review the RO district carefully when conducting their proposed SW 2.7th Avenue Study. b. Reduction of Transitional Use Area for pecified Uses in CR and CC —Districts should require Special Exception and in all instances a 10 foot landscape buffer minimum should be maintained. The original amendment, as proposed, allows for a reduction to 20 feet from district boundary with Class C Special Permit for specified —uses adjacent to residential districts. The Committee suggested Special xception because it would provide notice to a jacent roperty-owners-w ere{ -- lass c would not and it was felt that notice is' very important: • C. Interim Parking Lots - Committee voted to uphold the proposed amendment, as written. 2. Wild Animals Ordinance Committee recommends that the proposed amendment be revised to control any poisonous animals or reptiles in addition to all Class wild animals in residential districts or those districts permitting residential uses, 3. SPI-15 Zoning Text Amendment The Committee recommends that the fol,l.owin8 changes be incorporated to the proposed amendments; .>,r r ,-%'. , 'I.,. . , 15165.3• SPI-16t16.1_ 16.2t Floor Area Limitations, Floor area limitations for- SPI`169 16.11 16.2 shall be as follows subject to the limitations. requirements of Section 2000.1. 15165.3.1• SPI-16: Floor Area _ imitations, Restrictions on Nonresidential Flo -or rea. - 1. The maximum floor area for a mixed use building shall not exceed 3.-& 4.32 times the the gross land area. 2. The maximum floor area for residential buidlings vse• shall not exceed 12'-432 times the gross land area. 3. The maximum..... floor ... _area..._ for. nonresidential use shall not exceed 9-.4 1.72 times the gross - land area, provided however, that nonresidential use shall be - permissible, -only - in . a• mixed-- use.__, building where at least t�n-ee one square -feet of residential use shall be provided fpr every one square foot of nonresidential use. 15165.3.2• SPI-16.1: Floor Area, imitations, xceptions.- 1. The maximum floor area for a mixed use building shall .not exceed # 55.0 times gross land _ area. = 2. The maximum floor area for residential buildings use .shall - not exceed ,5.0 _times gross land area, 3. Except as modified by Section — 15165.3.2.1 below, nonresidential _ use shall not exceed 2.0 times•the gross land area. 15165.3.2.1. -SPI..16.1: Allowable r Acreage in 7 N 5nresi en= a oS rea or TF3' r9V3S O'1' t! n9 - r 4. Proposed Amendment F 2. M Offaite Residential use. For every square foot of residential use provided either onsite. in -a mixed, use-.build,i,ng. or... offsite Uithin. the boundaries of - the SFI-15 district and concurrently with nonresidential use, eithel- Ot!;Sitei!! 3 MiXed 12:5t! b bdiidialg V!- Off3i e withiiT Bpi 1-5 baundri- ies 0 f: the disbi-ict., the non-residential floor area shall be increased by one square foot, provided, however, that the maximum increase in floor area shall not exceed 3,;-0 --times----the -gross land area. Maximum total non- residential Floor Area Ratio shall not exceed 5-re 5.0. of the SPI-16.1 site. In addition, the Committee noted that if the sports and arena complex is, dev.eloped ..- -between North 6th and 8th Streets, the, SPI-16.2. - - district -. '-shoul-di-.. be:­..­1,.',.::.'1,!.= extended - to include the -complex and the Urban Design Standards and Guidelines should be modil-i-eT to better integrate the complex into the overall redevelopment program for the Overtown/Park West area. Reference to "rules of the, Department o f lannin is U—eleted. (Section 5,15.1) Approved, as presented. 4_4 In PD"H Districts, oeriain aces,In principal and acce3so,ry structures, would be permitted provided the propo.ped development was not already convenient) X served' -by exi' . . . . . the,propo3ed eve lopeft. (Section 60,6) Approved, go preaentad* MIAMI REVIEW AND GAILY RECORD Published Daily except Saturday. Sunday and Legal Holidays Miami, Dade County, Florida. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF DADE: before the undersigned authority personally appeared Sonia Halligan, who on oath says that she is the Assistant to the Supervisor of Legal Advertising of the Miami Review and Daily Record, a daily (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) newspaper, published at Miami in Dade County, Florida; that the attached Copy of advertisement, being a L at dOFisMIAMof I Notice In the matter of CIT ORDNANCE NO 9970 Inthe ......... X..$..X......................... Court, was published in said newspaper in the Issues of April 4, 1985 Afflant further says that the said Miami Review and Daily Record is a newspaper published at Miami in said Dade County, Florida, and that the sold newspaper has heretofore been continuously published In said Dade County, Florida, each day (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) and has been entered as second eiass mail matter at the post oflice in nxnur period at Ong Year tpreceding the first publication ofthe COPY adventsement; and sttlant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person. 'firm or corporation any discount, rebels, commission or refund)f IpP,purpose of s*curing this advertisement for publ! t) , Rjjt��4f y4� newspaper. `!Q Y rr 'I� ; . .. t SWOin to and sUb ribed bilore me this 4th d % Ap 1 AM 19.... 85 ���i Qpt�� JPetllicA�b `�e� Florida at Large IDA(SEAL) Rt,tht��� My Commission expire$ Juns 1, 1987. MR 138 i�� id1i1111iYit DAt� LROAL N '1161111ftiM liC`i�i� All interned Will t0b hulled that 6h tttd;'I1st day of I1+1SPof1, iSlad the City Cofhtiii99ibn of MiatPtg hl, Flotidd A116d tltil {f� 101110 tit ltld j ordih9fiteg: ORDINANCE NO.061 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING O II A NCE MM. AbO ENT PtO DECEMBER 20, 1964, THE APPROPRIATIONS BRDINANCE SY ESTABLISHING ANEW CAPITAL: IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, '%AYPAONT PARK REDEVELOPMENT UDAG"AND APPROPRIATING FEDERAL FUNDS FOR SAME IN THE AMOUNT '6P 0,61516150l CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND ASEVERAWL1TY CLAUSE. ORDINANCE NO, 068 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF ORDINANCE NO. 9500, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING ARTICLE 15 ENTITLED tPI., SPECIAL PUBLIC, INTEREST DISTRICTS," 13Y ADDING NEW SECTIONS 15150 ENTITLED"SOUTH PAST;OVERTOWNIPARK WEST OVERLAY DISTRICT" AND 15160 ENTITLED "SPI 16; 16.1, AND 162 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWNIPARK WEST COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS"; PROVIDING FOR INTENT, EFFECT, CLASS C SPECIAL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS,' PERMISSIBLE PRINCIPAL USES AND' STRUCTURES, PERMISSIBLE ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES, MINIMUM LOT REQUIREMENTS, FLOOR AREA LIMITATIONS, MINIMUM OPENSPACE REQUIREMENTS, HEIGHT LIMITATIONS, OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING, AND LIMITATIONS ON SIGNS; PROVIDING FOR REVIEW;' AND, CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE, ORDINANCE NO.9969 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 9500,:THE` ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, BY APPLYING THE SPI.15 SOUTHEAST'OVERTOWNIPARK WEST' OVERLAY DISTRICT TO THE AREA,GENERALLY;,: BOUNDED BY NORTHWEST 10TH STREET, NORTH MIAMI AVENUE, NORTHWEST 7TH STREET, NORTHWEST. 1ST' AVENUE, NORTHWEST 6TH STREET, NORTHWEST`3AW AVENUE, NORTHWEST STH STREET, AND NORTHWEST2ND AVENUE (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED' HEREIN), MAKING FINDINGS; AND BY MAKING, ALL THE NECESSARY" CHANGES ON PAGES; NO, 23`AND 36,OF THE ZONING ATLAS MADE A PART OF SAID ORDINANCE NO.'-9500 BY` REFERENCE AND DESCRIPTION' IN' ARTICLE 3, SECTION' 300 THEREOF; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND' A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE:` ORDINANCE NO.9970 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING"ATLAS OF ORDINANCE NO, 9500, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA,, BY. CHANGING ''-THE'ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE AREAS GENERALLY BOUNDED': BY NORTHWEST 10TH STREET,; NORTH MIAMI AVENUE". NORTHWEST 8TH STREET, NORTHWEST °2ND AVENUE,' NORTHWEST3RD AVENUE AND NORTHWEST 7TH STREET (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBEP HEREIN), FROM CG 2I7 ' GENERAL COMMERCIAL,.RG•316GENER4L'RESIDENTIAL, ` RG•317 GENERAL RESIDENTIAL, AND CR-3/7 COMMERCIAL RESIpENTIAI TO SP)16:. SOUTHEAST OVERTOWNIPARK WEST COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT EXCLUDING THE EXISTING PRZONING; MAKING FINDINGS, AND SY MAKING ALL THE NECESSARY,CHANGI S SIN PAGES NQ, 23 AND6 OF SAID ZONING 'ATLAS MADE_ A' PART OF ORDINANCE NO; 9500, BY REFERENCE AND DESCRIPTIQN' . IN ARTICLE 3, SECr10N 300 THEREOFy CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISIAN AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE, . ORDINANCE NO;`*1 AN ORDINANCE AMEN PIN G`THE ZONIN ATLAS "di,' ORDINANCE ,NO., QW, THE ZONING ORDINANC9 QF Tfjlr'' CITY OF MLIAMI, FLONDA, RY CHANGIND1,11E"ZONING " CLAS6I1PICATIQN OF.Th1E AREA QEIN A'LL 0QIJNR6t�. BY NORTHWEST @ri! STREET, :NQIiTM AMI "AVAIdt,Ir NORTHWEST 7TH :STREET, NQRTHWO.114IT' 9.ST' 0URT,. NORTHWEST 1ST':AVENDS, NORTI4Wr;$T,;4TH 1§T'REg'G';: NQ9THWFGT1RP.AV,ENVF.,IANDN0RTHWE. 2,0AVFN4tFm (MORE RARTIGULARLY P9.60RIDE—P F gft,11 I), F..RQiVI::� *T+ GENERAL,.00MMERCIAL ANR ,011 I I�II�REIRCIAL" RE61DENTIAL TQ. i'�*1S,� SS�UTMEfI T S V RT 1NIt1/ AR14f,' W�IiT. I: QM1�Ei*l�lAk RE6IO�NTIAL CAI&'f:RIQT,�`. t�lMli3� FINDINGS "1AND BY,,,MAKWr5 ALL T# .E.l�EC1 ARY r-rat�1� �1J� 3dA1llA�pA11l�,t,6,.JRkI• �ri�ts[�[a'��i7��,'1�����"Mr}1?#et� AA!##r ,; .. 1?91SI 8IFTION iI+1,ART'1Q E ai, lw>Ai7�Q)li Al�E TMF f��iF WNTAINING A Rtf�W-R RA90I914 ANR *A PROINAN0 :NIO, 9972 ._ AN oQI:NANI..9 AMENDING QNVINAN01 NfO• MI - T0g S j N#NG i# ltllAl+� €1 1= T JTY O'F 0IA�111, F; I air AM NO I Th 14. ne OFF; , i mmormif r. [+II:. IIfAtiVitr4�:t�Feiii ar�fJNf�'fiwef�E:a`R>�9 e 1 .+,c d, ot-w iUN avv t HEHEOF; CONTAINING A AEPEALER PROVISION ANb A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. ORDINANCE NO.9970 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING AtLAS OF ORDINANCE NO. 9500, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE AREAS GENERALLY SOUNbED " BY NORTHWEST'10TH STREET, NORTH MIAMI AVENUE, NORTHWEST 6TH STREET, NORTHWEST M) AVENUE, NORTHWEST 3AD AVENUE AND NORTHWEST tH STREET (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN), FROM "CG�W GENERAL COMMERCIAL, 80=318.13ENERAL AESIbENTIAL� RG•317 GENERAL RESIDENTIAL, AND, CR4317COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL TO . SP1=16: SOUTHEAST OVEATOWNIPARK . WEST COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL_ DISTRICT, EXCLUDING' " THE EXISTING PR ZONING; MAKING -FINDINGS; AND 13Y MAKING ALL.THE:NECESSAAYCHANGES :ON,;PAGES No,:,. 23 AND .:36.OF SA'Ib ZONING"•AS ATLMADE, A"'PAAT.OF] ORDINANCE N0:4500, Ely REFEAENCE'AND bt8CRIPT10N' `" , IN ARTICLE 3,"SECTION 300 THEREOF; CONTAINING -;A, ° REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVEHABiLiTY CLAUSE. i ORDINANCE NO 9971 z ! AN ;OFiDINANCE4iFAMENDING`1THE: ZONING."A'LLAS� &-`,' ORDINANCE;NO, 9500 ,THE'ZONING 0RD1NAtfCE'OF°THE'-:'". . CITY,OF,;MIAMI, FLORIDA:`BY'CHANWNO�,itkE,,20NING! CLASSIFICATION ,OF..`THE AREA"_GER90ALL�S`-6dUNbED." BY. NORTHWEST;STH,STREET;.'NORTH MIAMI-'AVENUE, NORTHWEST :7TWSTREET, NORTEST� 1ST`COUATr NORTHWEST, aST-..;AVENUE,; NORTHWEST;STH''"STREET;' NORTHWEST 3RD AVENUE; AND NORTHWEST!*dAVENUE. (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HERON)4FRbO;GG GENERAL COMMERCIAL'>AND..:CR_31T°COM.MERC;Iq'C'';'''.. RE8IDENTIAL;TO;SPI,16;2,SOUTHEAST'011EAtOWNIPARI�"' :-WEST; COMMERCIAL; RESIDENTIAL: biSTRI,CT;:,"MA C1NG FINDINGS; AND ,.BY_MAKING ALL -THE NECESSARY..'.1- :.ON PAGES,NO 23.AND,36�OF SAID ZONING ATI:AS`MAD!l;A; :PART.OF- ORDINANCE iM. 9500,�;BY:.;REFERENCE' DESCRIPTION �N'ARTICLE•3, SECTION $OD;THEREOF,"';` CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION�AND A:SEVERABIUTY;. ; CLAUSE.. :.Y„�.y .�.W,..,r,k4 },:,,t.,•.. entered as second class mall matter at� the' goat olfics to Miaml in said Dade County, Florida. for a period of one year next preceding the first publication at the attached copy of advertisement; and aitlant further says that she has neither paid not promised any person, firth or corporation any.discount. rebate, commission or rafuttA 1(�r,)� utpose of securing this advertisement for pu,`�,t �, id' Hjp le}onewspaper. SWbtn'to and 0blIctibed 6slors me this 4th.. d t✓ Ap pan, ts.... 85 Florida at Large (SEAL) �taIt#Hulu+++��` My Commission expires June 1, 1987.