Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Item #34 - Discussion Item
'1_15,-d,i11 III '.n1 111 1()N No. RI.StllIll I(IN 01 fill (.iIY Of MiAM1 I.nMM1'.',ION AMi N111NC; I'ARA(;IIAPII ;'6 Ill 1 XIl 1I1 i 1 "A" Ili ',111 1I1 I t1N I11-114(1. I)A 1 I i) %1 1111 Mill It ;'4 . 1 9111 . Ill 1 NG A Ill VI I nhM1 1 ()It Ill It WilIC11 AVIIIIOVI 1►. Wi Ill MC)1►11 iCAi 3 )N`. 1111 MIAM1 (A Nil It If DUPONT t'I A/A 1'ROJI C i. 1 II AMI NDMi N 1 1 X 1 I NI1', 1111 1 I MI DURING WIiiCII ';IIi1% Ni IAI CON',IR11C11(1N M11',1 COMMI N(A 10 JIINI .1o. (►III,; IIIRIIII It. 1 1NI►1NG iIiAI ',A 11) AMI NDMI N1 I ►I No I ON',1 I IIII I A '.1111'.1AN1 iAI Ill ViAi ION I III 1 1111 11 RM'. (►I IIII MiA141 (I N11 It 11 DUPONT I'I AIA 1'itl).11 C. i III VI I OI'Mi N 1 oil Of it ; AND 1)1111 C.I 1NG 1111 :3 i Y CI I kK 10 '.i Nil 1II1', RI %01 Ill iON TO Ai I i (:If I1 A(;i (:11 % AND 1 I II Of VI I C1i'I It. WHI.RUAS. the Miami I'lannitq Advi-.o►•y hoard. at. it-% meet.lnq of May 1'j. 1985. Item 1. followinq an adv lit-arin(l. adopted Resolution No. i'Ail by a to vote. r•e(o enendinq that. the (lily Cotteni .aloe I Ind f.hal. the proposed amendment. of the ilevel'tarptnenI order for the Miami Center I ilupont. Plaza i'ro•je( 1. as herefnaf ter• •.t-1 ► ori.h dne•. not c on%IA Itute .i and inl deviation; further recomtnen(linq Lhat �ald amendment. be approved; WIiiRfA`:. 1-he. City of Miatni Colnsr-ion by Ite%olut.ion No. 111-I140. dated September 74. 19111. issued a Ileveloimuv 1. Order. approvinq with ►nodif t(.al.ion. the Miami Center 11 Dupont. 1'lara Pro•ie( 1., .i 1leveloptnent. of Ite(lional Intpa( t. to he located within the City o1 Miami on 1\ii Illocks 1. ? and 4. DUPONT VIVA (riO-11). approximately ?01-:199 ';out.hea;t. �iid Avenue, ?01-79n %otithea:t. 4th Street (iiiscnyne iloulevard Way), whidi i)ev(�lop►uvnt. Order was emended by the. City of Miami Cotani :-.ion by Itw.olut.ion It?-/1 (fated January ?11. fill?; WIlLRFA'., on Mamh ?11. fill',. in public, he.Ontl before the City Commission 4 on this item. ;uh-.rquen t. to 1' l nnn i n q Advisory i1'ard Resolution No. PAR 17-86, the applicant. Miami Cmil.er Joint. Venture, v luntari ly withdrew all the requested amendments and modific.at.ions except or a request. for a time extension t.o June .30. 190; .Intl WHi1tLA',, the City Co►rtmission deems it adv sable and in the best Interests of the. (leneral welfare of the City of Miami to amend the Development Order as hereinafter set forth. NOW, THERLFORL. BL if RL%OLVED BY THE COMMISSION F THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. Resolution 81-840, dated Septemb r 24, 1981, being Development Order approving with modifications the Miami Center 11 Dupont Plaza Project, is hereby amended in the following partic,ular%.l MOTION FA i L.ED } 1Words and/or fiqur►►s stricken throu41h shall ba deleted. Underscored words and/or figures shall he added. The remaining provision, .ire now in affect and rt±miain unchan(led. Asteri,ks indicated omitted and unc.hantled material. 0 A. Paragraph 26, Exhibit "A", of the Development Order is hereby amended at fol l ows : "26. The Development Order shall be null and void if substantial development has not begun by June Substantial deveTopmen is deTine7ff herein as the achievement ot tfie o owing items: -- start of construction of building foundations for Condominium Tower and garage; -- obtaining all required permits, variances, and approvals; -- preparation and approval of raised pedestrian circulation element plans; -- dedication of all right-of-way; -- the deposit of all monies, bonds, or letters of credit for surface street improvements with the County or the State; -- finalization of a public sector financing package and/or a private sector front - ending agreement for construction of the I- 95 bifurcated ramps; -- construction of the drainage system for the Condominium Tower and Miami Center II garage. " Section 2. The Commission, following a public hearing at which interested parties were given the opportunity to be heard, finds that the amendment to paragraph 26 does not constitute a substantial deviation form the Miami Center II Dupont Plaza Project Development Order approved by the City of Miami Commission by Resolution 81-840, dated September 24, 1981 as amended by Resolution 82-71, dated January 28, 1982. Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to send certified copies of this Resolution immediately to the Florida Department of Community Affairs, Division of Local Resource Management, 2571 Executive Center Circle East, Tallahassee, Florida, 32301; to the South Florida Regional Planning Council, 3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 140, Hollywood, Florida 33021; and the Miami Center Joint Venture, 300 Edward Ball Building Miami, Florida 33131. Words and/or figures stricken through shall be deleted. Underscored words and/or figures shall be added. The remaining provisions are now in effect and remain unchanged. Asterisks indicated omitted and unchanged material. i IF `50'at - " PASSED AND ADOPTED this day Of 1984. 0 11 Sergio Pereira City Manager 7;J%4 A . e Director Planning and Zoning Boards Administration Department itlty OP MIAMI, FLORIDA :1fi TA-OPFICE *AEM0RAN0UM 7ATE: May 10, 1985 FLe: e�_ SUBJECT: RESOLUTION - MIAMI CENTER II APPROX 201-399 SE 2 AVE b APPROX BE- 201-399 SE 4 ST (BISCAYNE BLVD :JAY` 4EFERE4CE5: _ COMMISSION AGENDA - MAY 23, 1985 SNCLOSURES PLANNING AND ZONING ITEMS It is recommended by the Planning Department that an amendment to the Development Order for Miami Center II DuPont Plaza Project to extend the time during which su stantial construction must commence to June 30, 1985 be approved. At the City Commission meeting of 'larch 28, 1985, Miami Center Joint Venture, the applicant, withdrew the requested amendments to the Miami Center II DuPont Plaza Development Order (Resolution 81-840, Seotember 24, 1981 and 82-71, January 28, 1982) except the request for a time extension. On April 18, 1985, the City Commission extended the Development Order to June 1, 1985. Based on the applicants withdrawal of all amendments except the request for a time extension to June 30, 1985, within which substantial construction must commence; the Planning Department recommends approval of an additional time extension to June 30 1985 and a finding of no substantial deviation. Backup information is included for your review. A RESOLUTION to provide for the above has been prepared by the City AttorneyJ's Office and submitted for consideration of the City Commission. AEPL:JWM:111 cc: Law Department �. a��Y!1i1�i.��'•`'�l'n•.`,w�tff•[V.':7�'C.'a'.'_�6��M��Jtsi•"eA�'r�1. ,_, e7t!M'iltiv 6. PLANNING FACT SHEET APPLICANT Miami Center Joint Venture: February 6, 1985 PETITION 1. APPROXIMATELY 201-399 S.E. 2ND AVENUE; bOULEVARD WAY) ALL UF 2, 3 AND 4 DU PONT PLAZA (50-11)• Consideration of recommendations concerning a) a finding of no substantial deviation and b) an amendment to paragraph 26. Exhibit "A" Resolution 82-71; January 23, 1982 being a Development Order, approving with modifications the Miami Center II DuPont Plaza Project, a Development of Regional Impact: which amendment extends the time during which substantial construction must commence to June 30, 1985. REQUEST To consider a substantial deviation and time extension amendment to the Miami Center II DuPont Plaza project Development Order. BACKGROUND The Miami Center II DuPont Plaza Development Order (Resolutions 81-840; September 24, 1981, and 82- ;ry 71; January 28, 1982) allowed the developer, Miami Center Joint Venture, to proceed to develop the three vacant blocks in DuPont Plaza. This Development Order allowed development of the 6 acre site to a Floor Area Ratio of 13.95 (net) comprised of a 59-floor office tower, a 74-floor condominium tower, a 4,000 car parking garage. Public agencies have responded favorably to this development by a) revising the I-95 approach to Du Pont Plaza through the bifurcated ramp, b) relocating a proposed DCM station from east of SE 3rd Avenue to west of SE 3rd Avenue. The Development Order obligated the developer to certain conditions, among which were several which were advantageous to downtown, the City of Miami, Metropolitan Dade County and the State of Florida, summarized as follows: T. Condition 10 a - joint funding of pedestrian promenade and pedestrian bridges. .0 -. I ■ 0 - �,+a`w,.r.�uis�:'+�'*.sa�+!�:+r�.e��1,InN�r.4G�4ik►�'t�lk'*r'Oli�`�ks4a'-`x�—'�'`rr"*.`,b�oAi�e�*�'R'�r+-.'�'u' ' WIMP QWKWWW 0 Condition 13 a - dedication of easements and rights -of -way for the I-95 bifurcated ramp system and pedestrian system, subject to City grants of variances and conditional use. Condition 14 a - Prepare plans for the bifurcated ramps (estimated as $921,800 in 1980 dollars). Condition 15 a - fund, bond, or provision of a letter of credit for $813,200 (in 1980 dollars) or $971,000 (April 1984 dollars) for local street improvements. Note that $481,598 (in 1980 dollars) was attributed to Miami Center I. Any additional costs for relocating OCM station on 3rd Street are the developer's responsibility. Condition 16 - Constructi on of direct ramps from Miami Center II parking garage to the I-95 connector (Estimated as $1.5 million in 1980 dollars). Condition 18 -Front end $11.68 million (in 1980 dollars) or $13.96 million (in April 1984 dollars) for I-95 bifurcated_ ramp construction if a public sector financing package cannot be arranged. The following actions have been taken previously to extend the Development Order which would { otherwise become null and void in two years from the date of the Development Order unless substantial construction had commenced: -- By Resolution 83-1006, October 27, 1983, the recorded date of the Development Order was confirmed as May 12, 1982. -- By Resolution 84-527, May 10, 1984, the date upon which the Development Order became null and void was extended by 75 days (2 years and 75 days frorrt May 12, 1984) or until July 26, 1984. PAB 5/15/85 Item 41 Page 2 .^�►�-'�?�+r'e�ti:,�.:���isr,���i+�e�sisw=:c�s� '' ..�G�!�+ t S .. !•.. .FIN , - •f'�'-!�'f'rTrf if.VT.`I.MI•�{( 1 r �►'/1-1•�. r .. �-- i By Resolution 84-762; July 12, 1984, the date upon which the Development Order became null and void was extended by 5 days (2 years and 80 days from May 12, 1984) or until July 31, 1984. -- By Resolution 84-916, July 31, 1984, the date upon which the Development Order became null and void was extended by 85 days (2 years and 165 days from May 12, 1982) or until October 24, 1984. -- By Motion 84-1139; October 10, 1984, the Development Order was continued to December 20, 1984, pending a public hearing on December 13, 1984. -- By Resolution R-84-1393, December 13, 1984, the date upon which the Development Order became null and void was extended by 126 days (2 years and 348 days from May 12, 1982) or until April 25, 1985. -- By Resolution R-85-451, April 18, 1985, the date upon which the Development Order became null and void was extended to June 1, 1985. ANALYSIS RECOMMENDATIONS PLANNING DEPT. Based on the applicants withdrawal of all amendments except the request for a time extension within which substantial construction must commence; the Planning Department recommends a _ time extension, to June 30, 1985 and a finding of no substantial deviation. Item �1 �i Page 3 rn is -Ar S. E. L 10 t t t a s 3 � �� - i�i �� Q Qo�,, . _ 2 = ti 1� It 12 13 14 IT tl 12 -10 S. E. 2 (mct < S. E. IT 4:.. .......... ...... .......... .......... .......... .......... WAMI C)NVENTION CENTI -R AtOEND.---D 8 1 S C A Y N E RACTV 01- U SL 12"7 409 s T. 1110 1A PAB May 15, 1985 AS 36 201 - 399 SE 2 Avenue fIRICITI-1- ITY nN II? . \..- I.- fl TRACT D .1 I I 7 ..'S.E. 2 = ri 1-1 C A % t T It 12 110 ti tj tract V tract IA 40 :1 S.E. - . 2 S.E. m 409 s T. 4 13 fl 12 If 1 10 9 - :_ 5 2 3 4 3 6 7 3 . ... ... . .......... . . .... ...... '4 CHOPI N -PU I? \01 IX 0 TRACT D .......... ore �J .CD MIAMI C )NVENTION CENT 'R i "f:7: 10'-:: AMEN --D HISCAVIE BOULEVARD VIA Y 11% Soo III RAC- V A B Z�' C PAB May 15, 1985 AS 36 201 - 399 SE 2 Avenue flRlrI(FI-1- ITY nN I lLI, Pill I III F-- � .1 1 "= # t-c yr t{ �* 1'.' � sY i rrl;'� gt �.,�: +••;j�yR i r �: Sr fJ s :,,, t�;� " • nA �at�`d•`:"��' h fi ` �' 1 *� rt Y. as 11 , t i •y f �.�` Si fp-,. , . it "F.' tY .•s }' ' +..0 t ti( 4. F . Olt ��.] Y r i `s3ti t,. _,�"i.T-'i"��y lc�� ��JI`1.•t� � `� .`+. tt�4.� M4 ,� i/�at }'"��,`j}I'`�'~ �.i'''ip"' 4�� r� .�...:�.�. w�'� ''', '"`.c''ay , {� �'_ Ft . ' `i, �' �j�,� �7iP ,'�;,� � �/ f '•�`• r `" ;+t?r'"�• �. y�, �4"} f �. S, M{f1„ r. Sid` •..;:itilri•. i1'� �i .k.;rr , �t *:. 'Y,3..,tC.,t F ,' �1 't'�'''} , - •i .l.1, x�.i'' �3.�i _) 't/�y�q�tl� �.� � �{,7 .��,�:,��y)p�)`jt,,`p��{ , tt •a /Yltstt''+ i c,��Sjty£ �+�� �, � � ..�.�+{A. } 1 •U� �i l�\�+v"SN9 t. _�1 f}+i}.f+. tT ,,k .1� t j \ �,�},.'� i�+ }� 1} •T �". , F �9• j .r ' F� i�1 ���',� Ty.7 11'�u3J Lh..✓. .. ({/�+na ON 1 r��A:"' ��r� :r � Alt :7,� •{ h �• .s.., ,,,_:. —� _ ��,,. . t � � � ;rr•{„1�� ', s c;i '' 7 r1r?�,�f�;f •��a*tL�i��$ i e y/ \` �, }1. ri4 )�r?' ' 'l•,�,�.--' K, � ,.�' t �, �„i��'^ ?�s{�d�� �`j�� �• f ,� t� t:i. �E ` '� �� t ~ is F n., �`ktJ•�4� 1�'�e+r�sv �Ss.,. �., ..;4� ;� Y�<<�`. 5a v �t .�i, fi�'� 1�t1r,�*M "`.�.{.•+�»rrt cl`P% .4 1� p',,'� - yle 1.:{ �'+c..` �f3 ni .. 'L% .a...,5 •y}.i�. y'} c,13,jj j a ¢� �, , e �—"[Fy.,!i �t �. _ ,.:�lill�,`+4� t•���-� ' 'i; '' 4 VCl y'-' 4•� � -, I� 1 Est;ii 4i vfl '�''';���'�'�`�p � 'L'"r""°zbi•1 F E •� _i1"i ir N-+"' ���As I •_�, ..i.' , rtrC` T, t t (! � r r � �� y,a, v,.r _.. } � tl ' � + 2 �, , {�' .,. %'!�' ,�, 2�� t irMYir rr I �.. � r y � ..t�• ! t 1 ifv t �,3{t?"" �� ��w"'4' �id °:Io�f t3i�—� �, `\`�� _ x' t'r'rrr. � '�` +� �' r � r 1 Nr �iy�!I• /ri r`a,k " 'ram r,•s ��.. ,n* }r C. .;r•�rt�`T+1 `d4(3ti/V' 1'Wi4Y „tR:Cy (,� � � ss 't -- - •+ f'I+YU f7` 7t'+i i tr' i<� j44 ^,_ila �+7 aS>'D�a7 ,�,� ' >,�'•c � +C 7�: ` � I g� I *� ' � j;a�i:'.-:.iiias.l �a`�'.? :'•:a t „�z> f f',�+-', r°(�ra� ��}r�r�tt��� ^ �' Ie,u C� r� f #�(�''3-� µ.''.'y� �} �'� 't t :t�,,�` �•.' �~ r R`-� .7 ,y, J f t'( '��. r '.Z «.a a � .tit � i><7�t v r 1f t t� �. i tit �'k }, "}�d'� {''t'� k i � ,�!`.�..• �"$''+ �/ " ,i } . r ''.r"' ! � �<' 44� ^lit /n,:Y( �t 1 Y $'�'}}� r. R ��}} qq�?,, y nvx ? � 4`.E F, � r( I; �i �, (t� t' � � 'off xRi�i J5 t,w, yl " yt.gw � �,••,�(p�y i.f" q RIVER .��). fc..4®�' 4•.� 7 C i''!;"1 tci '' :k'7 '�'F. f �. ;9 I � t . 7t rt'p y7 ��v.k�.1�i j� t `r 1 #1'[,t � i. s 'A� ti F e:YT'�7 ti'L. `;yL� •`aiP *' t RI VEIi rl �t -`r' 4.{.Y•t rR 4{ iHIN, S`�`y%,t.t �'"'s :rr"� S:• T e r' ' R rr.-01, `: r.KMf"' � •meµ �, Stt- � i.�l' `- 1,2s�•y-�t- k, .`�.,''}'�4� S`n. J 4tiw 4 tC • �c,� q 4 }r t s G t,,1 t wrk b� 17T t' fr*x� 1`� -'(,� f k� ;-1&,�µ'� (• } �, rp dl �ii� 1 �f ,py } •ti la r �}qt 'a c P�t:�rr Iftl 6a,v �'�.t.'lJ..i �..�y.,'�v'`-i:y.}y'!" i �aT , "-j� •4, W i'• y.f`{Yr * .,� ><,x t,, ,'' ' rat � �''�' � • j�;r.�ff�Tat�j��;�f+i..'�`�rl6d�t ttl� ,�1 Y 1'�•�JR`� �Y !""IV f.r..e—.� m T } Y t 1 � `°'kA A•1. sl � J *; r �Y •.� art t re ;.� A't?.' ' h t •` .y 35 #vr PZ. P A B May 15, 1985 AS 36111,$ .yy r' , Y f I ,• f A9 SE 2 .Av#:nue , t �Rlf- ,.� n, • F,. n -- .:•�., — .• . ;�; •�.. y•�. ,.:�1,:.}i?+��••T+..p 1 � �� •w;�. .e. •''�". ..•.`�iS• .�.l:. i.►'�.. :ali�:,tl�r . r•a1 ..�;y�►y�.Nr.. .,��„ 0 DM,Nil' MAY -6 A9.16 • -� a ..a t •-a -:w .i � May 2, 1985 Mr. Robert Sommerville Shutts and Bowen, Attorneys Edward Ball Office Building Suite 1500 100 Chopin Plaza Miami, Florida 33131 n Re: Miami Center II Development Order Dear Mr. Sommerville: Per your oral request before the City Commission on March 23, 1985, consideration of a time extension to June 30, 1985 for this Development Order and consideration of substantial deviation will be taken up by the Planning Advisory Board May 15 and the City Commission on May 23, 1985. Otherwise, the Development Order would expire on June 1, 1985 Your oral request is considered to be the remaining part of your application of February 6, 1985; all other items having been orally withdrawn. Sincerely _ --- _ Z.a gio Rodriguez .+ Director SR/JWM/mv cc: Mr. Ted Could Miami Center Joint Venture 300 Edward Ball Office Building 100 Chopin Plaza Miami, Florida 33131 Mr. John Kozyak Kozyak and Trapin New World Tower 100 N. Biscayne Blvd. Suite 607 Miami Florida 33132 , +. • ♦..�.. .'� . • t.... - :... • u *:rsaa ♦i��au. 311fi� !)�'...)' �3. ..' �a..y f _ ._ � ... . :�_'�..r•a .a•:+Y��it tit _ � { �•-w.�..•.i.•'r...•.L}yM. - yl:.i►',y►a:�i•r �.wt.•�:a„►LT - '- 11ti r� ' • I a+ . 'A .1. KAY -6 A916 May 2, 1985 Mr. Robert Sommerville Shutts and Bowen, Attorneys Edward Ball Office Building Suite 1500 100 Chopin Plaza Miami, Florida 33131 Re: Miami Center II Development Order Dear Mr. Sommerville: Per your oral request before the City Commission on March 23, 1985, consideration of a time extension to June 30, 1985 for this Development Order and consideration of substantial deviation will be taken up by the Planning Advisory Board May 15 and the City Commission on May 23, 1985. Otherwise, the Development- Order would expire on June 1, 1985 Your oral request is considered to be the remaining part of your application of February 6, 1985; all other items having been orally withdrawn. Sincerely /gi•o Rodriguez Director SR/JWM/mv cc: Mr. Ted Gould Miami Center Joint Venture 300 Edward Ball Office Building 100 Chopin Plaza Miami, Florida 33131 Mr. John Kozyak Kozyak and Trapin New World Tower 100 N. Biscayne Blvd. Suite 607 Miami Florida 33132 •• r 111,0016. :nua !ham :Ja •: ��A ,j".e-C _`y:;«�43e)�!bCntJl �l�T' fiM lliil�l iii t+lt. +)!+5:. r:: �M ?tom, _ .. .. ..!tills ?L�!"� �L f'R►.'' # �,+ !M�=� 'A i, ! CITY OF MIAMI , PLANNING AND ZONING BOARDS �. ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT 27S NW 2 STREET MIAMI, FLORIDA 33128 - APPLICATION TO AMEND DEVELOPMENT ORDER Section 2806 of Zoning Ordinance 9500, changes in approved Major Use Special Permit, reads as Follows: • Changes in an approved final application for major use special penit, or final application approved with attached me difications, conditions, or safeguards, may be peTnitted after application to the director of the Cepartment of Planning by the original applicant or successors in interest. Upon receipt of such an application for change, the director of the Depart.tent of Planning shall :• t prepare a statement demonstrating whether or not Such changes would meet the same requirements as for the original approval. The director shall transmit such statement, tooether with rec=, n— dations on the proposed changes, to the City Cc., , ' ssi on. T'he Ccirmi s=ion may take such action as in aporooriate in the matter; provided, if the Cccrmi ssicn has not aced after two (2) regalar -meetings of the C=mission have been held foliowing receipt of application for change, the reccrmendat i ons of the director of Planning shall be deemed to have been approved. Where "-quests for changes are made that are found not to be within the requirements for original approval, application for such changes shall be made as for an original application for major land use special permit. REOUI R£ME NTS : 1. Current survey of the property, sketches and/or plans as required. 2. Affidavit as to current ownership of the property and application, as well as Disclosure of Ownership form. 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within 375' radius from the outside boundaries of the subject parcel, 4. Fee of S300.00 to apply toward cost of processing. J. njyl] orra A00•1 ��n� 1 A♦ _ e i "a 'JNi!Mtt^t?';t!��ri+�lSC►'t�r►e.aay"_'�'�Ta?�� ���,'�'�"i. . yri:�itii?s.�'��"►��^i%9n'FC��iI•Y�'.biCld�iR+r' "tt•�..'. t . r • i .a DATE January 22, t 9RS The under signed. being the owner or the representative of the owner, of the property located at 20i_,o() 17�,a ��• _ r=L ately 201-399 4`.-`. S''-eet (Bizcsyne Boul eva_= .-.ay AND ARE PARTIC'JL1 RLY OF -SCRIBED AS: AL; nTr'� -,S 2, 3 %;D 4, DU ?:T FI=Z(50-13) . klegai cescriptlan) doles) respectfully request the appr-oval of the City of Miami for the following amensment(s) to the Cevelo;T-ent Order for the above -described pr--;er ty' as def i ned ty c i or; to Statute 3cA. 05: Consideration of rec:.-mendar i on concerni ng a) a finding of no substantial deviation and b) amendments to paragraphs 1, 15b, and 26 and Figure 3 Modified Reco=ended Highway System, Exhibit •A• Resolution 81- 240; September 24, 1981 as amended being a Development Order, approving wi th modifications the Miami Center II Ou Pont Plaza Project, a Development of Regional Impact: which amendments increase — the elevation and gross building area of office tower one; change ttie perni ssi bl a use of the condcmi ni urn tc;,+er to office use; decrease the gross building area of t.he offi ca (fernerl y condominium) tower two; increase t2'e gross building area of the retail areas in the gaileria and nail and parking structure; permit the use of two floors as an exhibition hall if exhibition space is recut red by the City of Miami, and del et a provision recui ri ng the posting of funding, bond or letter of credit for road improvements prior to issuance o` a certificate of occupancy for . e Miami Center I (Ball Point) Project, extend the time during which substantial construction must commence and deleting a portion of S.E. 3rd Avenue from the Modified Recommended Highway System. (Note: This item was continued from the Planning Advisory 3oard meetings of November 14, Decemoer 5, 1984, and TJanuary 16, .1985. ) SIGNATURE BY: or NAr!F l4I.�dI CENTER JOI.IT VENTURE TheIe JB. G3ould, Partner CSr•c.� �I (Z' Y 7-lG-usJ4 ADCRESS 300 Edward Ball Buildinq, 100 Chonin Plaza CITY, STATE. ZIP Miami, Florida 33131 This application is approved decried in accord with City Commission on Resolution No. other • i 4 • f ! f • rf ' :S t .,"".,..� Gam' u':"..:.�►) �' Gam: = CF t= *55 r' —g ,72:02 Sefcr! cm. the mderr, gmid auz'�-:�►. •.: ctjr per=,1;r ,eared MITI ZB 3 . G.CUZ.D 1bp bwU"g r'y me f .- c ay sr+or t. upw car-N. de;sas and says: L he is the ryes•, cs be e= I ,, ve Cr the emm-. s. ..:t • u'�a ate- : ^ a r �c a �. r. ^u- as 1"�.—ed t7 9 5 C O c.£ �..e C.a :: e of ,! , c cfVa , :-_=.da. r. md �,;�7..2� CA C•`�.' � at���� ~...'� t..�:..i F.:,w�'1�� ��tS� ,:���`.� � �T, w i.. Rim f%:21-1 re- -,1 etz •--: A` -, r t_t to 3, cam' a r_ t_^ or z �-�i �^{ �, c� .. ,.�� as �. the ac,, pates ..-- --.. a:-..az:.-d he-•mto anci =ad2 a ;�:z - cf ::da ar'" : Vav= ar--`".:c and swc= ;o ana before = of 19 ker"y PMZC STATE W FLOSIOA NY CONISSIOA rip. ccr .2.1gas TMI0 GUna Is. Uro. • .�1 ':F.'CCO�. 3. G...::.0 i V., t aT i FCT,W ?UBUC STATE EG,ZfO THkU C *AAL LN5L2AW-' UNO • Lt4 S:;AL'�l:�C:i_TilEE.i RUC 11214, ..w i f eZ f!ai t irtg s n+� Zc -• - 3a 11- 3uild�:��.., Te l'pnene xv=er 91 3 s —� O Z Legal Oescripticm: Owner Piam Mailing Add, Telephone N=ber Legal Oescription: Owner's liame Mailing Address Telephone XLmber Legal Oesc-." pt i an: . ArY c::;er real estate Property ctimed indtvidualTy� • jointl (may ccr;arst;cn, a3r,e..;;;ip or privatzl xi* Y. or severally is listad as follows: Y) .»':in •�•/7' oz Lye sub3e:: . Street Ad�rQs; + • " l.raal Oescriat{cn - 777 i i 1 9 i Street Address • Leca1 Ces ct=on r r i f Street Address Legal Cescri cti^n um f 3 /� V. 4w ' I %;&l dest;��n and ==et addre= cf smv•7e= gal pccpwo_ . A11 of Blocks 2, 3 and 4, DU ?OtdT. ?Z.AZA .(56-11) Approxinately 201-399 S.E. 2nd Avenue; approxi=ately 201-399 S.Z. =ty Street (Biscayne Boulevard :-Tay) ' 2. Ow"V(s) of suv. -_= r•eal ..,•. t of 0"ne-..hi.a. Not*: City of Miami C-r-::.n No. 9419 ha in q a iinancial i.rterrst, either or i.r�dizr=_ in the -T=jer. attsr of a ptspnt:J_ C.on, :c-a"cst; or `JA"sKI �G tiD C,_tp �,�` * 1•'''lGJI. •t:." c.,�,,..7a;.irr,e3r` ii,Fh�r�31 }�ldei.^i of (^ w� 2t-, cn$, �.�fu'�« L'S Q4F i ti :,T- C:" :_rTv Q•�+.C.�. .�r°..C1•�. 8� j a:.=3.e$, C.'�CP_C.':t"' '.11'."1 ''.�:�1: �^'. S Ma--" • '". t�r1 tP 1zter"msr. Theodore S. Could, 501 Par"er 300 'Ed-4 1 73all 3uildin a 100 Chor:n ?1aza 33131 O1,^zo_a '.or!: Florida Eq`aity Corp. , 50% Partaler One Financial Plaza, Suite 2210 Ft. Lat;dercale, Florida 3. Lecal znd st= -ec address o-f am _eat (a) awned 5y 1" d xn=-er to c.:= _-: 12a%4. (5) ' t!: z •- Feet .F the ,.1 .-��• Center. 'per.=.._e cwns South ?o_t_:,r. of Tract D, DU FONT ?��.� (53-1.1) ; aperox+..•�ately Z01-S99 (S.) 3i�,csy::e Bcu_eva_ Thecdc_ e B . lould is General Part-nez of :Iiauni Center LJ=Jted Paznershi? chic: owns: The NCr t`i portion o: Tract 0; .. DU FONT PLAZA (50-11) ; approxi.iaately 100 Chocin Plaza. • qL • Pa one_ of Cwner s..... ;..., t01 ) V • • T'HE CCCRE 3. GCULD a11V SidDtr:� C .�525 cSd says =ac ne 2.a =e ?armner of Qwner of the real dese: ixd in arsxr to questicz sl. a►bc7e that he . h= ^..�� `r a F_ ^;•Dirt} r•- and =.at t::e ---re ax- t=•.:e arc c�aiete: -X�d (if ac'..:..— as at:_.:^^.ey= fer 0wrer) that he has aur.':orir1 to th"— Cir:=^su cf owne=nhip �.� cz elf of t':e owner. i . ! CAA �• Theodore 3. Coul be:r.e no this '_r..�• _ �" - �'C'rt �,.. • day of .t �. �•�.,_"' LQ 3 \ v� i ircrsr,� ri:nl�,c, �t3c� .:..� • at • LV i.'�:V.w-�... .r-�. �d� ��a+1�"ov�Si,i�ww17 � � � 1j} �. i/ii�+ �.r. �:w7 -.n % �a� �.� i (�Tv:.`i �4.0 Y'�i•'i 4 l� ��.+.y � � Y CTti f 0". OV � :'l.�i ;.L w • 1 `1 b i nIC STATE Q Otaris �+ r tss:at fir. ctT z.1Qu , . r.....�.•.+►•• . .` 7 :: �; t`r :;,+, P C; ZW; lk%%C Nal G[Iuu In. JW. C-..]aaC� ' . 1C .j _-HX1 i .:.=\LA-,�-L Na1yZAr_..: 1,L-Z , • 1 (CT+e~1 ��C C�Ya:_tS=.iC:1 r.i�� '_ �?;S • . ' ' ,;,yam . �.•. � i• .�.'�� - � . _ ...: ... , � _ - 1 y � t 1 • . ..�a,I�t!r�►:i''�-a�h'�l�.idi»'a''�iFi`Jrii►7 �, 4 7!�v►.•;.rt+r• l�' ilF�liYi[+' �ii}'�=�r "qy=ltii''iP••�i' ' �_ i+� 1 f{.N•i ...%. JJ ' LL•AIN. 1 �. . 8 PG&-5%4PIA & YORK FGORZDA EQUITY CORP. dj February 6, 1985 _ a• ' '�'" ""' '" HA►YD-DELIVERY Mr. Joseph W. Mw%tanus Planning Director City of Miami 275 N.W. 2nd Street ►ii.aai, Florida 33130 Re: Miami Center I. and II Develovment Orders Dear :ir . Mc4anus : This letter is to advise you that Olymaia & York Florida Equity Corp. will not oppose the application to amend the Miami Center I (Ball Point) Develooment Order, and we support the pro- r ! nosed amendment to the Miami Center 17 Development Orders, both = j of which are scheduled for hearing before the Planning Advisory - Board this evening and the City Commission on February 14, 1985. Our position is based upon the u^derstarding that the only an_nd. a ments are thk,cse specifically set forth in the attached rescla- tons Mr. Gould's attorney prepared and sent to you and us yestarday. a a We :per` .acently -furnished with a copy of a pr--posed agreement regarding Miami Center I and II, which Mz . Gould's i attorney draftad. We did not authcrize Mr. Gou13, on behalf oA. the Miami Center Joint Venture, to negotiate with the City or to execute any such agreement and we understand the City is not asking the Miami Center Joint Venture to sign any agreements at this time. If the City wants to negotiate any other points, the .Miami Center Joint Ventura will have to consider them carefully i and act pursuant to the terns or the agreement of Joint Ventura. i 7 Very truly yours, r T. Gordon Hendry TGH:13 CC: Mr. Theodore Could ' .* Joel Maxwell, Esquire _ _ .,;� ram.. • tw., rs. ♦•.• . r � . ..rli. . ..� . .. •� • -' }) --8r SSW+ •.�y+►..� a-•y i��1.{ir}►ur!�' wM:t: f.4�a.. ,' ae•.':•� — . a s t i• i of a , arven a Yotts PtoR=A Finam cotes. rtro" 3 �Z s +�+ . M�•+ .. February 6, 1985 SAND-0ELMR- Y Mr. Joseph W. McManus Planning Director City of Miami 275 V.W. 2nd Street Miami, Florida 33130 Re: Miami Center I and I1 Develooment Orders Dear Mr. McManus: This is a `_o11ow-up to the letter I delivered to you earlier today. This is to advise you that Olympia a York Florida Equity Corp. supports the orrposed amendments to the Miami Cencar I (Bali ?pint) Develcoment Order. The other provisions of my pre- vious letter remain unchanged and we have received assurances from Mr. Gould that he will not attemot to sign any agreements on behalf of the Miami Center Joint Venture without my express approval. Very truly yours, 11a I j fr_j 1: 1 Ir Exhibit "A" DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHt1ENT TO RESOLUTIONi�_ Let it be known that_-e rsuant to Section 380.06, Florida. Statutes, the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida has considered in public hearing Commenced on. January 15, 1981 and continued until. September 10, 1981, the issuance of a Development Order for a Development of Regional Impact, to be located in the City of Miami, at approximately 201-399 Southeast 2nd Avenue; 201-399 Southeast 4th Street (Biscayne Boulevard Wav), being ALL OF BLGC:f�S 2, 3, and 4 JUPOt.T PLAZIA ( 50-11 ) and after due consideration of the consistency of this proposed development with pertinent regulations and the Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional I-!anning Council takes the following action.: Approval of Application for Development Approval, as revised, with the following modifi- cations: ' FINDINGS OF FACT WITH MODIFICATIONS Development 1. The development of the 6.0 acre site is limited to a Floor Area Ratio of 13.95 comprised of the following elements as specified by the Applicant in the Application for Development approval, as revised, and further limited by applicable provisions and prcce- dunes of the City of Miami Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 5271, as amended: Element Gross Bldg. Gross Leasable Area Unit= Area (sq. ft. ) Area (sq. ft. ) sq. ft. srsac Office Tower (59 - stories with ele- vation of 860 ft.) Office (exclu- sive of retail) 1,731,101 1,575,342 ' Condominium Tower (74 stories with _ elevation of 774 feet) 694 Residential Use 1,490,286 Mezzanine . and Lobby 14,190 Retail in Office Tower, Condominium .- Tower and connect- ing Galleria 12 6#903 • 96,747 Garage (15 stories with elevation of 204 feet) - .. Parking (10 F1.) 1,733,100 4,000 Retail (3 F1.) 263,520 199,104 Restaurant Health Club (1 F1.) 19,200 'r Tennis Courts & Stands (1 Fl.) 173.310 Y The Applicant voluntarily stipulates that the scale model presented ,at the City Commission meeting of September 10, 1981 accutaately portrays their project except as reflected in Figures '1, 2 and 3 and the schematic drawings attached hereto and made a part herein. Any substantial. change in the project, as represented by the model and schematic draw- ings, must he brought. back to the City Commission for consi- deration and al?provaI. Any Var.ianccs and Conditional Uses will be brought before the City Commicsi.on for consideration and approval after a decision by the Zoning Hoard; it being understood that any ' such City Commission approvals (or disapprovals) may further limit the project and are incorporated by reference in this Developmcnt order and ;Wade a part herein. 2. The Applicant small determine if a General Perm it will be required from the South Florida Water Management District and, if necessar.1, apply for and obtain a permit prior to project construction. 3. The Applicant shall follow procedures for air quality as established by the Florida Department of Environmental Regu- lation 4. The Applicant shall construct an emergency helicopter land- ing area for emergency evacuation on the roofs of both towers. Further, the Applicant shall, at any time that a feasible solution is found, provide roof space for aerials and appurtenant minor structure for the City's communication system; such aerials and appurtenances shall be at City of Miami expense. The Applicant retains the right of architec- tural review and anaroval. S. The Applicant shall provide the development plans to the Fire Department for review and comment and incorporate any other measures which the Fire Department deems advisable to insure that the towers can be evacuated safely in an emer- gency. 6. The Applicant shall notify the State Historic Preservation Officer of the expected construction start, vacate the park- ing, strip the blacktop off the site, and provide reasonable opportunity for exploration or evacuation at least 30 days prior to the start of the construction. 7. The Applicant shall incorporate security systems into the design of the project, including the parking garages and ' pedestrian connections, to assist in protecting employees - - and patrons by discouraging crime. Security syste s 'and construction documents shall be reviewed by the 1liami Police Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. 8. The Applicant shall use only native species in landscaping. ' Access and Circulation The Applicant and the City of Miami (in conjunction with _ County and State Agencies) recognize certain mutual respon- sibilities in resolving and mitigating access and circula- tion problems within, and in the immediate vicinity, of the project. of so S TO resolve. these problems., The Applicant Shall: The City Shall: 9a. Provide sufficient 9b. Carefully evaluate truck service area to any application for a ' insure adequate service zoning variance for off - to the building, effi- street truck loading bays cient off-street loading in the context of provi- and unloading operations sions of the proposed new and unobstructed flow of City of Miami Comprehen- traffic on SE 3rd Street. sive Zoning Ordinance (January 21.4, 1979 draft) ' ' and insure adequate and satisfactory access, egress and free traffic . flow through review and approval of building plans by the Florida -- Department of Transpor- ' tation and the City of Miami Planning Department (in consultation with South Florida Regional Planning Council staff) prior to granting of zoning approvals. - 10a. Recognize a responsibi- 10b. Having consulted lity to participate. in with DDA, DuPcnt Plaza the Pedestrian Circula- Hotel, the South Florida tion Plan (in lob) as Regional Planning Council follows: staff and the Dade County Department of Traffic and In conjunction with the Transportation, hereby development of the south- approve, in concept, the east block of the pro- Pedestrian Circulation ject: a) Applicant Plans (Figures 1 and 2 Shall participate with , attached) to difTferentiate Southeast Bank in the between pedestrian and construction of a vehicle circulation so as ground -level pedestrian - to provide greater pedes- promanade along a por- trian safety and security tion of SE 3rd Street and to further free traf- ' lying easterly of the fic circulation. TO im- southerly extension of plement this Plan, the the west line of the City will rely on public Southeast Bank Financial and private participation Center plaza area; it with the objective of being understood that completing this system the promenade must pro- expeditiously. The se- -' ' vide reasonable egress cond level pedestrian from the Southeast Bank connection design Para - parking garage a minimum meters are as follows: of 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 , P.m. week days and 16.5' Clearance at the satisfy other traffic undersize of structure requirements proposed to grade. •' by the Dupont Plaza Task _ Force, as approved by the Open for operation during City Commission. The ar- normal business hours or chitects for the Appli- coincident with the hours cant and Southeast Bank of operation of the DCM, shall jointly design as a minimum. ' ground -level promenade - which shall be con- As a matter of policy, m lm L 7T-- '2;z Teach _; . ........ T-- FIGURE 1 PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION SYs'll',ll (GROUND LEVEL) MIAMI,CL:PJTFR PFIAt5U III MIAMI. PLO-- (PA ' SOUTHEAST OPTIONS— w i • I ' AT LEAST ONE OF `s THE TWO OPT IOPIS uCJV-CONTINGENT ' ' IS NIMIDATED + ON PA14 Mi . BANK L—L` a` •1 I I �•� M . SOUTHEAST— IF REQUIRED i BY CITY - `. ',"'r •� .. p01 ME?.ZANINE ! 'T' j• - � - —2i- - - - ._ _ _ � __ r-',t - ' ---- - �IC•IV _ ._ ..- _. • , ._ •.a.r �•. it — - �_ — �.� • • � � � tf L• L•lal A L •►7•wp t qfM •1.1►P•A 3 j l f ` or••t;� ro::w • 1 . •. • . —J crca..w fov!• • • • w w w w . _ G _ - ._ 11CJv *See Development Order for bridge location. '"'''"'"'"• FIGURE 2 PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION SYSTEM(SLCOND BEVEL) 1� � �,� 3�; ...:.., III ll�lii� III �lil �ll�llll�lll'� �IlI� IIIII1�'I��IIIiII I11 ivIP ''III' r1l I l"ipllpq��� p illli l��i „��� 11111111 diPTl lql l� pl�iq;11'�I'iI�II�III�llll���ii�'IIIITI The applicant Shall: strutted.: •by the Appli- cant. _Thy Applicant and Southeast Bank - shall jointly Fund (501 50 ) of the cost of design and construction of the arcund--level promenade. If disa- greement between App- licant and Southeast Bank arises with regard to the lesion of the ground -level promenade, the Miami. City Commis- sion shall makcf the final decision. b) Design, pay for, and construct a s6cond- level pedestrian con- nection frcm the park- ing Garage in Miami Center I, across Bis- cayne Boulevard, to connect with the Miami Center II nla:a in front of the office Tower; and c ) design, pay for, and construct a second -level pedes- trian connection, at an elevation of approxi- mately 29 feet City of Miami datum frcm the Condominium Tower across SE 3rd Avenue to the Miami Center II Garage. In conjunction with the development of the southwest block of the project; design (in consultation with the DuPont Plaza Hotel, with final approval by the Miami City Commis- sion) , pal► for and con- struct a second level pedestrian connection from the Miami Center II Garage southerly across SE 4th Street (Biscayne Boulevard Way) up to the building face of the DuPont Plaza Hotel and office Building, easterly of of the structure pre- sently occupied by the Chase Manhattan Bank. The City shall: encourage, maximum use of SE 3rd Street as a promenade. City shall approve final design of the a landscape and pedestrian environment plan, including the pedestrian promenade, at -grade and second - level pedestrian con- nections for the entire project. The City shall support an appli- cation for Federal funds for a second - level pedestrian con- nection over SE tth Street. The City shall provide security, for the second -level pedestrian connections. a "p (O The Applicant Shall: Shall the responsible for up to ' 100% of the construction of the pedestrian crossing extending from build- ing Faces of Moth properties, to the extent that such costs are not: publicly funded. The DuPont Plaza Hotel shall accommodate the pedestrian connection and pay for and' con- struct any renovations to the building face, wall, structure, founda- tion and interior re- quired to receive the • pedestrian connection. It is further under- stood that the City, Dupont Plaza Hotel and other agencies will sup- port an application for Federal funds for fifty (SO) percent of the de- sign and construction costs of said pedestrian connection and vertical to ground connections, if any, within the public right-of-way; in this event, said pedes- trian connection shall be accessible from 'the public right-of-way to the public twenty-four _ (24) hours per day. This pedestrian connec- tion shall be provided prior to the elimina- tion of the at -grade pedestrian crossing of S.E. 4th Street (Bis- cayne Boulevard Way) at SE 3rd Avenue. In conjunction with the • development of the northwest block of the project: a) cooperate with Southeast Bank in the design of a second - level pedestrian bridge across SE 3rd Avenue, linking Southeast Bank Financial Center to the relocated DCM station or the Miami Center II V IN. a City Shal It a NO I f The Applieant Shall: "m cit; shall: Garage, if any such second-level pedestrian connection is required by the City, Applicant ' shall design, pay for 3 and construct the con- nection of the bridge, if regu i r ed , to the Miami Centex' II (3arage, +. so as to provide access to the relocated DCM u . ' station, contingent ' upon Southeast flank's design, fa.nding and construction of the bridge and b) be obli- gated to design, pay for and construct that portion of a second - level pedestrian can -section across SE 2nd Street, frcm the Miami Center Il garage to the center line of SE 2nd Street, immediately • west of SE 3rd Avenue, if an agreement can be reached with the owners of the existing Pan American Bank Building for their funding, design and . construction of the. remaining portion of the pedestrian ccnnec- tion. The Applicant shall be responsible for main- taining those pedes- trian connections which are its obligation to construct. lla. Submit design para- llb. Not grant a building meters, a schedule of permit for any portion of pedestrian circulation the development (founda-_ system elements and any tion permits are exempted ' appropriate design modi- any may be processed) ' fications to the develop- until the parameters, ment plans within 120 schedule and any design days of the issuance of modifications are reviewed this Development Order and approved by the Dade for review and approval County Department of Traf- ' by the agencies named in fic and Transportation and llb, based on either the the City of Miami Depart - Applicant's and Southeast ©ents of Planning and _ Bank's approved plan or Public Works and referred in the event of disagree- to the South Florida went, the plan as approved Regional Planning Council by the Miami City Commis- staff for review and com- sion. Nothing shall re- ments. No final certifi- lieve the Applicant of Bates of occupancy will i The Applicant Shall: The pity Shall: the obligation to pay for be granted • for complete end construct: the pedes- __— Operation of the project trian connections in 10a. until the required pedes- trian circulation system elements are completed, contingent on performance - by Southeast Dank/Gerald D. Hines Interests, the. • DuPont Plaza Hotel and the owners of the Pan : American Bank, Building; Provided that certificates of occupancy will be - granted for completed pro- ject elements (Paragraph Y 1) when the related pedes- trian circulation system elements have been com- pleted. 12a. Reach agreement 12b. Resolve the remain - with the City concerning ing pedestrian circulation the remaining pedestrian system issues of construe - circulation system issues tion, owners`:ia, insu- as described in 12b with- ranee, security and util- in 210 days of the is- _� ity access and reach nuance of this Development agreement wit: the Appli- Order, based on either the cant within 210 days of = Applicant's and Southeast the issuance of this Bank's approved plan or, Development order, recog- in the event of disagree- nizi ng the increased tax = went, the plan as ap- revenues to be generated proved by the Lmiami City upon project completion. Commission and make a complete report to the South Florida Regional Planning Council on 10a, - lla and 12a, as amend- ment to the Application for Development Approval. _ Nothing shall relieve the Applicant of its obliga- tion to pay for and con- ' struct the pedestrian connections in 10a. 13a. Have prepared, in 13b. Hereby approve,- in colloboration with con- concept the "Modified . sultants for the- Florida _ Recommended Highway Sys - Department of Transports- •, tem Plan" (Figure 3 Lion a technical opera- attached) as recommended - tions and impact analysis by the DuPont Plaza Task of certain modifications Force September 2, 1981; to the current traffic it being understood that concept plan adopted by that MPO will be urged to MPO Resolution 1-81• substitute this plan for January 26, 1981 and which the plan previously modifications as set forth adopted by MPO Resolution In Figure 3 attached 1-81; January 26, 1981. ! "Modified Recommended f Highway System Plan" have The City shall continue =� been recommended by the to urge FDOT to maintain The Applicant Shall: "the City Shall: DuPont Plaza: Task Force at least one -north -bound on Septembt�- 2, 1981, lane from the Brickell with the participation of Bridge to SE 2nd Avenue, the Applicant, Southeast to SE 3rd Street to SE Bank Financial Center/ 3rd Avenue. Gerald D. fiines Interests and the nu ont Plaza The City shall. not grant Hotel. a building permit until a copy of this Development Upon the granting of all Order has been transmit - variances and conditional ted to the South Florida use permits necessary for Regional Planning_ Council the development of Miami and 'a period of 45 days Center 11, as discussed has elapsed from the date in Paragraph I hereof, of issuance of this and the obtainment of any Development Order. necessary action or agree- ments from the' City re- quired for the construc- tion of the Miami Center II garage, the Applicant shall dedicate all ease- ments and right-of-way, owned by the Applicant, required by the City, , County and State to im- plement (or prcviue access to) required transporta- tion and second level pedestrian system improve- ments, specifically in - eluding required dedica- tions along the north right-of-way line of SE 4th Street (3iscayne Boulevard Way). 14a. Assume that the 14b. It is ex=ected that FOOT has a consultant _ the FOOT will have a cop - under contract by Septem- sultant under contract by ber 11, 1981 for the task September 11, 1981 com- outlined in 14b, ccmmitted mitted to completing con - to completing construction struction documents 12 documents either a) 12 months thereafter. months thereafter or b) 12 Failing which: months prior to the esta- blished ccmnletion of The City shall prepare construction of the miami _ plans, specifications -and -. ' s Avenue Bridge, whichever estimates for the design conditions are more len- and engineering of all ient; failing which: surface street improve- ments in DuPont Plaza, ' The Applicant shall pre- such documents, if re - pare, according to speci- quired shall be completed - f ications to be agreed by September, 1982. (Sec upon with FOOT, design City Commission Resolution • and engineering plans of 81-113; February 26, 1981.) the I•-95 bifurcate! ramps to the surface streets and Miami Center II garages (see Figure 3); and obtain final FOOT .. approval thereof; such documents, if required, '! shall be completed by .a February, 1983. 4 f� 8 2 - 7 1 r I w j .g— IF -77 7 Wlv� 4. f: 7 tie A Ir • r j Jl 7' P -. - v �2,� A 1A. F jo%-Vma'sma's--I Z a"-,, ,4 .44nia L 6 ......... .. "� � ; ; -I- '. `.•.r/, I. 1•..�lfl_.-'-•i/I••..._'-T.�II ' •.l J.)... ... .. .• •?.:• % .•., �.1� =1_.-..�-1_ _I -_.- ._• •'' �...r_•./� / /• -,A A -j ci. C— A- -FIGURE 3 MODIFIEDIRECONMENW916 s reconmended by the DuPont P I a za Task Forct, HIGHWAY sys,ml TLAN .9-2-81, to be forwarded to the 41,t) as a sub- stitute for tl)e plan pl-L-vtowily ,,lofted by Mpo Rusohlti6n 1-81 - Janqary 26, 1081, I • F �0<1) i I _--_ �a . �`� r:--rv—: y�f� r---l-•r! _ .. i —` 4' 16. ' ' I ' - � �� � /fin f�'./'. 1._:.l•.[% �.. •, �� 1 •'' :: • i I •'� • � 1 '• • / • 1.• vj- It ff • � ,; % - �.�"'.�' • � ��'- � � i `'r -� " �'� _ -:�: •: is ; :1�•"= �.t _ , : � 1 ,' : . ��•n {•1 , r t', .I•II C.,t,.ls f;Qa.rs , 1 '�Z a .� 'sI r ' .1'•,l 1 Ail ._ . �(1�•�t.�"{. ,;1I3;_ �kae_ _ -.— -- ••a•/sa,x-i•t�., _� - �I 1'I t\�! j'�".^.-"f r�'!.{, ::_ -� �• •,' .. �� '.� I',t' . !-�..'. `�•'.`t`� � ,r .�. <Y-~^^ ....�.:::�.i.��r t�:_.1�--�1-�'-•-.I ..I� _ --�: —'-"r '-7�1:=.�3"'� ,�5•�•a1• s •► •mot r Aden .a � r I 1 `I(i jr 'f TM a � :�`• ..fff, .. , � .. t � 1 r �� I. `I,\\\ .. ,• ..• '. �• I ,•� ' „ CO..]•�. �"N. Will • � I � I. � .x � / 1 \ , \` .. �/ fff .r, fff] 11,', t �•�r ' � .' �� III ` _ , • '� 7 —i � f�' .. .: s : l .� .. i l � tur.tn L.=�+ .1 q,, .•�at�7-G.t.\ :1.1---0 Li7b-�....,. r-.-r-� _•6.._"�..�-�i`�.�w �:..d-__-_... .- ' 11 v : FIGURE 3 11001 IEDI RECO�C1Ir��Et� As recommended by the DuPont Plnz:� Task Furc� HIGIIICAY SYSTE`i PLAN9-2-81, to be oi-warded to the 4110 as a suh- .' ► stitutc for ti,(---. )Ian previoutOy allopred by ' I d1P0 liusohition 1.-51 January 'fil I931. � I II IIIII I IIIII IIII IIIIII Illllll li�l UIII�I! I„IIII ,� ,P� II II�Ilelllul � ,•:� I'll I�VI II IIII IIII !III Illlll IIII I Iul�lll�'I��ull,l IIIIIII!II!�II'It�s I I � I I IIIIII II �IIIIIIIII�I� II,�IlIII�RI,IIJIl�R��ll��lllllll.I#Il�h.�I��lll��ll�l,l��I�Il,II�III�,�.l�ll��Il��NII�,��IIIlI!l�I���III��1�19.�II��I���� ��,,.,..�� ���r,���4����� III IIII, 11 �I���I�,I�JpI��I�,i gl�illq��I I II�IIIIlI,Lt'1�1,l�L�II161�Ii�� i 0 !£ 3 the Applicant Shall: As a condition of issuing s building- -permit, ' the applicant agrees to pro- vide a maintenance of traffic plan and a con- struction employee park- ing plan by caJ.endar quar- ters until July, 1984 or the issuance of a certi- ficate of occupancy for structures in Miami Cen- ter II, to be approved by the City. 15a. Fund, bond, oj� pro- vide a letter of credit to the County and/or State for up to $813,200 (in 1980 dollars) for State and/or County ccntruction of surface street imrpove- ments in DuPcnt Plaza generally simliar to those improvements shown on pages 60-68 or the Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council (Exhibit B). It is assumed that the total costs to Dade County for the DC'M system shall not exceed those costs which the County would have incurred had the DuPont Plaza DC11 station been built as in the conceptual transpor- tation plan adopted by MPO Resolution 1-81; pro- vided however, that any additional costs for the proposed relocation are the responsibility of the Applicant. 16. Construct, per speci- fications to be agreed upon by FOOT, the direct ramps from the fliami Cen- ter II garage - to the I-95 connector at an appropriate time to be determined by FDOT, to insure simultaneous com- pletion of the I-95 bifurcated system. 16a. Cooperate with the DuPont Plaza hotel in obtaining a direct ramp connection from I-95 into ,any new building erected on the DuPont Plaza Hotel site. The City Shall! i A 15b. Insure that the re- quired funding, bond or letter of credit has been provided prior to issuing any building permits for the proposed development or certificates of occu- pancy for any portion of Miami Center I (Ball Point). r (? 7 -7 , 4 The ApplLeant Shall. - The City Shall: 17. Evaluate, in colla- boration with the Dade County Dept. of Traffic and Transportation, the Dade County Office of Transportation Admini- stration and Florida De- part. ment of Transporta- tion the rrcommended op- tions, contained in the Report and Rccommenda- tions of the South Flo- rida Regional Planning Council (Exhibit "13") , and any other options which may be feasible for public sector financing (14.6 million in 1980 dollars) of the T-95 bifurcated ramr-s to the Dupont PJa z a surface street system; and pre- pared a report and recom- mendations, to be sub- mitted to the Regional Planning Council, the Metropolitan Planning Or- ganization, Downtown De- velopment Authority, and • Florida Department of • Transportation for review and comment withi,n. one year of the date of the Development Order, on the preferred options which should be oursued, in cluding the steps necl"* CIS- Pary to insure their realization ization so that con- • - struction may begin im- mediately after ccmple- tion of the Miami Avenue Bridge project. Conside- ration shall be given to the increased ad valorem revenues froin Southeast Bank and Miami Center I (Ball Point) and II in funding these necessary improvements. 18. Front end 801 ($11. 68 million 'in 1980 dol- lars) of the construction costs of the 1-95 bifur- cated ramps by: A) As a preferred op- tion, arrange loans to or bond purchase from appropriate governinental agen- cies, based on an et -13- +� Applicant Shall: The Ciro+ Shalli equitable reimburse- ment agreement among appropriate parties which shall specify „ interest rates and maturity dares; or b) Arrange loans to, or bond purchases from _ appropriate govern- mental agencies, to be evidenced by tax- _ _ j exempt governmental obligations which are eligible" for pledging (at a mar- ket value that equals the`full pur- chase price) against public deposits by the State of Flo-ox , rida, as determined =- by the Florida State - Constitution, State Statutes or the State Controller; whichever — is applicable; if a public sector finan- cing package has not been commited by September 30, 1982. 19a. Promote energy con- 19b. Hczk closely with servaticn and the use of t}1e Downtown Develc=..ment _ WE public transit by artici- p P Authority, the Dade Count- == WE atin Transportation p 9 in Trans oP Office of Transportation System Management, coor- .Administration and thet dinated with the Dade Applicant to promote tran- County Office of Transpor- _ sit use; shall encourage a tation Administration, downtown parking pricing �= through such measures as policy to discourage 8- _- • employer -subsidized ride- hour use and shall con - sharing programs and van tinue enforcement efforts pools; variable work hour to restrict or prchibit -_ schedules such as staggered on -street parking, all work hours, flex -time and of which are intended to a 4-day work week; employer maximize the use of the subsidized transit use available roadway capa- -_.- coupled with remote -site city. parking policy_ to dis- courage 8-hour use. The applicant shall prepare a report for review with- in 60 days of this Dev- velopment Order. Energy Conversation The Applicant shall: 20. Prepare a technical feasibility analysis for construction and operation of a cogeneration facility, which analysis must in- clude those elements specified in SFRPC report (Exhibit "8") x w 1 _ and submit the-- analysis to the South Florida Regional Planning Council Staff, the Dade County Office of Energy management and the City of Miami Planning Department for review •and approval, prior to obtaining any building permits. If the results of the analysis indicate that such a facility is viable in DuPont Plaza, the applicant will construct and operate it as an integral part of the project• 21. The Applicant shaII the Following energy conserva- tion measur.cs into the pr.ojccrt or provide the Council Staff a written justification for their omission: size power transformers closer to demand rather than connected ' load; . add power factor correction devices for improving power factors on large motors and Determine the most feasible i,istallaticn location; . provide building wall, duct and piping insulation which exceeds the energy code requirements; . use a light color for the building surface to reflect solar radiation; Provide pedestrian shade by extensive planting. Minoritv Particination 22. The applicant shall work with the City to prepare a minority employment plan indicating how the maximum feasible number of construction and permanent jobs resulting from the project can be accessible and available to minority applicants especially Blacks. 23. The applicant shall vigorously seek minority contractors, es- pecially Blacks, to carry out construction work as feasible during the development phase of the project. General ' 24. If the ownership of the property is transferred and the new owner wishes to proceed with development other than provided in this Development Order, then the new owner must seek an amended or new Development Order. 2S. The Applicant shall submit a report twelve (12) months from the date of issuance of this Development Order and each twelve (12) months thereafter until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued, to the South Florida Regional Planning Council; -the _ State of Florida Regional Planning Council; the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs, Division of Local • Resource Management; all affected permitting agencies and r the Planning Director, City of Miami Planning Department. This report shall contain, for the preceding twelve months: A general description of construction progress in terms of { construction dollars and employment compared to the schedule in the Applicant's Application for Development Approval and . .. revisions thereto. Specific progress in response to paragraphs 9-19, it being understood that submission of this report is not a substi- tution for specific reports required by these or other para- i graphs. - . ♦ • f . A cumulative list of all permits or approvals applied for, approved or diznied. A statement as to whether any proposed project construction changes in the ensuing twelve (12)months are expected to deviate substantially from the approvals included in this Development Order. Any additional responses required by rules adopted by the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs. The Planning Director, City of Miami Planning Department, or a project director to be named later, is hereby designated to receive this report, and to monitor and assure compliance with this Develop- ment Order. 26. The Development Order shall be null and void if substantial development has not` begun in two (2) years of the recorded date of this Development Order. Substantial development is defined herein as the achievement of the following items: start of construction of building foundations for the Condominium Tower and garage; obtaining all recuired permits, variances, and approvals; preparation and approval of raised pedestrian circulation element plans; dedication of all right-of-way; the deposit of all monies, bonds, or letters of credit for surface street improvements with the County or the State; finalization of a public sector financing package and/or a private sector front -ending agreement for construction •o! the I-95 bifurcated ramps; construction of the drainage system for the Condominium Tower and Miami Center IT garage. 27. • The Applicant shall give notice to Richard P. Brinker, Clerk, Dade County Circuit Court, 73 West Flagler Street, Miami, Florida 33130, for recording in the Official Records of Dade County, Florida, as follows: a. That the City Commission of the City of Miami, Florida [indicating date of adoption] has issued a Deve-lopment Order for the -Miami Center II DuPont Plaza Project, a Development of Regional Impact, located at approximately • 201-399 SE 2nd Avenue; 201-399 SE 4th Street (Biscayne Boulevard Way) being ALL OF BLOCKS 2, 3, and 4 DUPONT PLAZA (50-11) - b. That Miami Center ,joint Venture a Florida general partnership; . 100 Chopin Plaza, Miami, Florida 33131 are the developers. c. That the Development Order with any modifications may be examined in the City Clerk's Offices, 3500 Pan American Drive, Dinner Key, Miami, Florida 33133. I, - moo ' 1 r� ,do That the Development Order constitutes a land development re- gulation applicable to the property; that the conditians con- tained in this Development Order shall run with the land ant bind all _successors in interest; it being understood that recording of notice shall not constitute a lien, cloud or en- cumbrance on real property, nor actual nor constrt)cti.ve notice of any of the same. 20. The Applicant will incorporate all original and additional revi- sions to the ol7iginally submitted Application for Development Approval including the transportation analysis and recommended system into one complete document and will provide copies ,jithin 90 days of the date of issuance of this Development Order, to the . City of Miami, the South Florida Regional Planning Council and the State Department of Community Affairs. 29. The Application for Development Approval, as revised, is incorpo- rated herein by reference and is relied upon by the parties in discharging their statutory duties under Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. Substantial compliance with the representations con- tained in the Application for Development Approval, as revised, is a condition for approval unless waived or modified by agree- ment among the parties. 30. Nothing in this Development Order shall he construed as preventln= the Applicant from obtaining certificates of occupancy for Miami Center II, if the Applicant complies with all conditions specified in the Development Order. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Miami Center II DuPont Plaza project, proposed by Miami Center Joint Venture, through its predecessor • . Holywell Corporation, complies with the Miami Compre- hensive Neighborhood Plan, is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies with local land development regulations being the City of Miami Cairiprehensive7 Zoning Ordinance No. 6871 as amended; and. The proposed development does not unreasonably inter- fere with the achievement of the objectives of t:b.e • adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami; and The proposed development is generally consistent with the Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council and does• nut unreasonably interfere with any of the considerations and objectives set forth in Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. 1 �Illlllllllillllllll!u,II!��111IIIIIIII�IIIIiIIIIIIIIIIVIillllloillllllllllhlii!IIIIIII I L I II III I I L IIiI II �I I u dJllhl lllu�lllll�l!Illf!Ildllull�IIVI�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�I� III�dIIIIIIIII V�dlll l r� l II ull l 111 llIIlll illI l I hl IIIII 1111 I I I 11 � III IIIIIIIII dl . I r FUTURE CONN. r. a*" onvot , Ii 1� 1 •w ;q.T. r r•' tf t 1 r\, 1 !l �. • • • .�� r 1 j(( i IJ1�--II li.♦ M"�•.••.MI \ • 1.1 1 ' r\ •\�•.1 / zl_ �.\ —� f,� .Gi6.r:�nin ;lii6f.lil�riyiil:�, 1 jJ_71 -—=-�—.C_.� •w 1 �/ t � _ i 1+1111'lll��� II�I�,�I�„1„�,•�'P'9�' I� __ /—\ ��!�; s !! 1 IF_-j-j, l���i' 'i ��.1i b Ell j ` r } -I „`.- - '- i ._.I I II,I i� r 1 � c 11 ry�� ` r•,ct �o.•w 1� 1f DUPONT PLAZA IIOTEI it 1� IIII III IIIII 1I11 III IIII IIII III 11 1 ...._...---- CCMfCt7 a PFIABCJ 11 _ _ '^" -'- SITE PLAN r; rN Ll i t 1 y. •.ru aa_r.. � � al wr.MT ` �• ' w as — ��' � ' _ I •f - i �' r ` ' ~ ' � � .`-a aans.a. W wa Neu u� r �Y.rr..f t� `\+� � �+1/eµl ti� —�,`` _ .} 11t1 \��� ��f,lu.• �ruTT..T R I , rl _ a2 *• � � • P..o.�.. aia.tl.Y + +• RrthMl GEtYTEq 4 --ASE It ray^a• ern .Y.•OM► O.,/121 a,aw.q •ao.�o4 Vail a ml," ma R.Is ,-to 7® a Is M a `.`� • • � • Lyra. 1�.%c,•nr_•Y''•�.T'::� 1E L�_fi=—C 1 = a •� F�.M+•A •.a•W •.tl.l Y •1.�/1¢ G J. •.La rt.Y ��--. w—=t•o=.. u.[.. Y •Y.ot �tY .c •.••gym t.t • fAIAMf Cf=Nran e"PHASE 11 -r::;'• =N .- /ll/+•ONf NL•=r• MI�M� ILOPIIO� didil III I hl II Od li�l, 111 I I'li�ld ill 1 I . / • , 1 1 1• 1 T. it � , • 1'7 - � 1! l I l,; 1 • + I . . 1 1 1 I •tl V .4 . t.,1 tl 117 ' v w r r 1►t 1 ,tl�� t L ,l ,:, r •1• I , Itl 1 4. 11 I to Is to It 1 1• + r �. . �. - 1.Itr + .! . is , ' f"• Y 11 11 1• `+ i N , 11 t ►1 Y1 �t i t n K so as r 11 t,M r,l ►+ I,b1•= 1•[ 11 L: '. (]l r 11 1• V01•C ;h l Irt I 1 1 • . 1. I. uJ `L La so so u/trll1 , ll�l �11 .� .... ! •a p {' r tI r1 r I f: ,; ram. IFI� j j �yI� ll Y K �; FF I Y; 1rr`1`I K 11 1 I I: �.:1 ►+ M Y I t R n u 1 So is to 1• I Gish�• ; C :`;�;�� t •+ r ' ;.., a —.is G t t in l/ Ih �1, r 1 it r + �. • •:{ .� _.� N 1 h [ .rtY CI .1• i., it . .. i ^• N11 1 1 1`1 1 1 1 It1 1; •� '• t"'�; a • �l-� _ a • -Y to • 1 1 1 Y JI �•• K 1[ w ••Y.•ll ttwa•..+w 10-1a t1Y11tY• 11r••l a+nn 10— • r+c...r rw. I.lr Ixa+la IMY 1 u SOUM fu -no" • y 1 . I� 1 1 0 s a 1 • ,..---�.---.p-...,,.,_,..�_,..�.�,_.....,,m„_..,�.....,..,.. ... >'--=rv...... _,ems------.••,.;�_:•r•.�.€,•�,..,,....•.,.�-.__... 0 Up :cl cz; �C3,: sit m 1 oata) C3 W, it to-mu.m" cl C, n k3 ► C2 at cl, 7l1113 rl 11 43 C) CD an al -. :!is 63 m 01 Q, C3 do In 43 M w .0 0 10 C3 C� C2 c:i Is C"3 C�l In C:) 0 6:13 T3 C3 — Cl ► go 0 on f: 2 4 ► -0 C3 KD L313 10 C3 6j a M GO -1 C3 C3 m C3 ir, 17 i's in �cl -M I I 10 1111t O LU m 1. all] C3 . 3 113 - r---7 of 0.00, 11a04 i III IS& la Simi Ic CAM "CA-141 s &AJW4 ..... v4s, Euvikilml CENTER o PHASE 11 M, ,DINT MILASOL. OAI&&At VLDPoCA t �i�V����ll���ll�-• '- !: I I , I . I I,_.� �� _.i 11 II _ i iwJ Illldl l d� I��I��Ilil��llll�lll�l�l�l�l�lii�l�lll�ll I �I�iV III � li � I� � i � � , • t i 46 f..............r. � � � � i.L'.T� �/'r11 RA1� rO RI •.....ran • .awaM /�/1aa... a.1VK QY1 aaU n���AbA ' i— ._ _ T•traNrt CCN7CA o PHASE 11 1 OywONl w6AS& am^**L i4.0fteaA r r t EA/T GZVAPON ITII 4 or 3 -p j I .1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 3 91col 21 tip :0:8 it r t WK; :Wl F-11- -Ink socard lh%9 orego 10"ll afteJew Alft CO.0d- #0.64 of G."IlL Me& 6-bereave CL%o 9~46 MIA -MI CENTER o PHASE $I 46LI-Ge. a @$UK.ft$ .4 DUPONT PLAZA. MIAMk PLONIU^ Ni , tllilu�sViliyl'i9III��IV Ii6VIVll61'Iiwf!ii'!�I�ililiilii'IliliVl' ii, Ilil' III{ illlll �{ Ill III LIII' { II i II'lllll III I`"' ilkillik Mill 11 I FILF 1-1 j ! Ali • •n n /fit -•� .. 1 �j - _ • O[ Ij r t•�r rt c try W - :_. - - -.. • tIr ' • A O - .. Li a th ' • ua Iw u ail . � .. .r ..i y � : •. UK • tlai q t u .. � 1 + 1 f • la r :• f 1 - ! - - • aR u � t • lr 14 - Ir :•: L. I• f r .t • r A ..� C 1 li. 1■ u f W 1 _ + • •. r at [i� l• it is f r • } • . -:. - • f w U ti( rt. is o: s r I� _ _ _ - . • .Ia f aaj o5 taw .. � Iw r • . _ _ . t Oil in .L. - • r W� f K u. r. f w t - - Lik a go fit to • • r.f q r .• w wlwl u t - _ • r f a Isa y .• + ---.._ - • v o o w aatl 1 �• .ta au .s K.. nu as I .. ci . • o ar u a1j tr . • •r I5-__ au� i I 1 • • 0 in w I tr r r rr 1-4 1 i ' • •• - La Ill vZi • t••tM ayy aO u •:.r w Wlnl IGRF •a w •. {pJIN WI •w OLMA" •• • r w••e rur[. • uar..,Iaa •� n.o.•Icaa CAST CiIv�TXH •� _ -_. .. AM1 CENTEn o PHASE �011 NA 1•/.Oa•t PLAZA. •AIAMt •LOn10A r•.r.,wr •a a