HomeMy WebLinkAboutO-10000r
,1-85-804
1/27/85
ORDINANCE NO.;. 1 �
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF ORDINANCE
NO, 9500r THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
2102.2.1.1 AND 2102.2,1.2 OF SECTION 2102
MIAMI, FLORIbA, BY AMENDING SUBSECTIONS
2
ENTITLED "NONCONFORMING LOTS, it TO PROVIDE
THAT NONCONFORMING LOTS UTILIZING THE
"EIGHTY PERCENT" EXCEPTION AND RULE FOR LOT
DIVISION MUST MAINTAIN THE SAME COMMON
FRONTAGE AND ORIENTATION AS THE PREVIOUS
LOTS; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE.
WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting
of March 6, 1985, Item No. 7, following an advertised hearing,
adopted Resolution No. PAB 29-85, by a 7 to 0 vote, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL of amending Ordinance No. 9500, as hereinafter set
forth; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission, after consideration of this
matter, deems it advisable and in the best interest of the
general welfare of the City of Miami and its inhabitants to grant
these amendments, as hereinafter set forth:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The text of Ordinance No. 9500, the Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, is hereby amended as
follows:l
"ARTICLE 21. NONCONFORMITIES
*
SECTION 2102. NONCONFORMING LOTS.
* *
2102.2. Rules Concerning Combinations of Contiguous
Lots in the Same Ownership and with Common
Frontage.
2102.2.1. Combinations Required Where Nonconformity was
Created at Time of Passage or Amendment of
Ordinance; Exceptions.
l _ .
Words and/or figurs stricken through shall be deleted.
underscored words and./or figures gures shall be added. The
remaining provisions are now in effect and remain unchanged.
AstsrisXp indicate Qmitted and unchanged material.
2102,21111. exception; Eighty Percent (80%) Rule
Applicable Where Three hots or Less are
involved; Reduction in Side yard
Requirements by Class A Special Permit.
Where the land in common frontage in the same ownership
is of sufficient width and area to provide at least
eighty percent (80%) of the width and area required for
three (3) lots or less in the district, it may be used
and/or divided to provide not to exceed three (3) lots,
maintaining the_ same, common frontage and orientation as
Devious lots, eac with at east eighty percent (8 $)
Ot the minimum width and area generally required by
district regulations.
2102.2.1.2.
Rule for Other Combinations of Lots.
Where the land in common frontage in the same
ownership is of greater width and area than provided in
Section 2102.2.1.1 above, the land, if divided, shall be
divided to provide lots, maintaining the same common
frontage and orientation as previous lots, conforming to
the requirements for the district, except that in the
division one remaining lot may be created having not
less than eighty percent (80%) of the width and area
generally required, or an equivalent reduction may be
distributed among all or part of the lots so created. In
such cases, full district yard requirements shall apply
on all of the lots.
Section 2. All ordinances, Code Sections, or parts
thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed insofar as they
are in conflict.
Section 3. Should any part or provision of this
Ordinance be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be
invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the ordinance
as a whole.
PASSED AND ADOPTED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this
18th day of April, , 1585.
PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND READING BY TITLE ONLY this
23rd day of May , 1985.
Maurice A. Ferre
MAURICE A. FERRE, Mayor
v
LPH ONGIE
City Clerx
Randolph S. Rosencrantz March 11, 1585 PIL.[I
City Manager
ORDINANCE - RECOMMEND APPROVAL
TEXT AMENDMENT - ART 21, SECTION 2102
SUBSECTIONS 2102.2.1.1 & 2102.2.1.2'
Director COMMISSION AGENDA - APRIL 18, 1985
Planning and Zoning Boards PLANNING AND ZONING ITEMS
Administration Department
It is recommended by the Planning
Advisory Board that amendments to
Zoning Ordinance 9500, as amended, by
amending Article 21, Nonconformities,
Section 2102 Nonconforming Lots,
Subsections 2102.2.1.1 and 2102.2.1.2
be approved.
The Planning Advisory Board, -at its meeting of March 6, 1985, Item 7,
following an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution PAB 29-85 by a 7 to 0
vote, recommending approval of amendments to the text of Ordinance 9500, as
amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, by amending Article 21,
Nonconformities, Section 2102 Nonconforming Lots, Subsections 2102.2.1.1 and
2102.2.1.2 to provide that nonconforming lots utilizing this exception and
rule for lot division must maintain the same common frontage and orientation
as the previous lots.
Backup information is included for your review.
An, ORDINANCE to provide for the above has been prepared by the City Attorney's
Office and submitted for consideration of the City Commission.
AEPL:111
cc: Law Department
NOTE: Planning Department recommends: APPROVAL
•.. a -. , �,•o .. •.� �... '�... j.jc, .. .... Y•Y...t ....b ,...a i..�.�'%!•i.{.a. �..• .$J� 4 ::C�1. <..Y+�dl �Y� 1i xt.9 .. a.YNt•.f.• •tNY?��.� of
y
JF.:.Snl?A:A1L.a y W , : �,• :.r.": �;S,Ssa}U�. � 4 . y..... a ... ,-.u+;a YtlY.*Y':`t:: 1`'` .. .. :1�'.'�iflYiiyl''iMN;.._ J . •. � . , ... ... �. .. .. •„i.. •' Y .. _' S � i «„y�r. Wi•i '•Yr:. ,. -•:� ;x.,,��.w. ix rta�ytwY. ,.. -.
PLANNING FACT SHEET
APPLICANT
City of Miami Planning Department:
February 12, 1985
PETITION
7. Consideration of text amendments to Ordinance
9500, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the _
City of Miami, by amending Article 21
Nonconformities, Section 21012 Nonconforming
Lots, Subsections 2102.2.1.1 and 2102.2.1.2 to
provide that nonconforming lots utilizing this
exception and rule for lot division must
maintain the sar^e common frontage and
orientation as the previous lots.
REQUEST
To prevent reorientation of nonconforming lots,
through a replatting process.
BACKGROUND
;There lots are nonconforming to Zoning Ordinance
9500, Sections 2102.2.1.1 and 2102.2.1.2 allow
for replatting of up to three lots which
together meet 8O% of the minimum width and area
required in the particular zoning district, into
up to 3' lots each of which meets 80% of the
minimum width and area required in the district.
ANALYSIS
Replatting of substandard lots is intended to
bring the lots closer to a conforming status;
not to confer a special privilege by reorienting
lofts. These amendments will prevent re -facing
of these lots. If nonconforming lots can only
take advantage of the 80% rule by reorientation,
the replatting will be administratively denied.
RECOMMENDATIONS
PLANNING DEPT.
Approval
;- PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD
At its meeting of March 6, 1985, the Planning
Advisory Board adopted Resolution PAB 29-85 by
a 7 to 0 vote, recommending approval of the above.
{
PAD 3/6/95
Item #7
Page I
00
r..
•'r,11v+? . ._ , ! �-t . r "-a7,ii. _;'tf'1i:: _ , r.
Amendment to Ordinance 91500 - Article 21, Nonconformities
Section 1. The text of Ordinance 9500 as amended, thg Zoning Ordinance of
the City of Mi anii , F1 on da, is hereby amended as fol l oais :
ARTICLE 21 MOMCONFORMITIES
Section 2102 Nonconforming Lots
"2102.2.1.1. Exception; Eighty Percent (80%) Rule Applicable Where Three Lots
or Less are involved; Reduction in Side Yard Requirenents by
Class A Special Permit.
Where the land in cornmcn frontage in the same ownership is of sufficient
width and area to provide at least eighty percent (80%) of the width and area
required for three (3) lots or less in the district, it may be used and/or
divided to provide not to exceed three (3)lots, maintaining the same common
frontage and orientation as previous lots, each with at least eighty percen
:w of the minimum width and area generally required by district
regulations.
2102.2.1.2. Rule for Other Combinations of Lots.
Where the land in common frontage in the same ownership is of greater
width and area than provided in Section 2102.2.1.1, above, the land, if
divided, shall be divided to provide lots, maintaining the same con-mon
frontage and orientation as previous lots, conforming to e requirements or --
the district, except at in the division one remaining lot may be created
having not less than eighty percent (80%) of the width and area generally
required, or an equivalent reduction may be distributed among all or part of
the lots so created. In such cases, full district yard requirements shall
apply on all of the lots,"
Sergio Rodriguez, Director January 17, 1985
Planning Department
ATTN: Richard 0. Whipple Amendment to Ordinance 9500-
Article 21 , "Non -Conformities``'
.C,.l 1 --
Dorfald"•r:`Cather �� ^•�
Director of Public WorKs r '"
We request that your department initiate an amendment to Ordinai.bce
9500 to clarify certain provisions contained in Article 21 - "Non -
Conformities". The amendment should read as follows:
2102.2.1.1. Exception; Eighty Percent (80a) .TRule
Applicable fiere:Three Lots or Less are
involved; Reduction in Side Yard
Requirements by Class A Special Permit.
Where the land in common frontage in
the same ownership is of sufficient
width and area to provide at least
eighty percent (80A) of the width and
area required for three (3) lots or
less in the district, it may be used
and/or divided to provide not to exceed
three (3) lots, maintaining the same -
common frontage and orientation, each
with at least eighty percent 0"j) of
the minimum width and area generally
required by district regulations.
2102.2.1.2. Rule for Other Combinations of Lots.
Where the land in common frontage in the
same ownership is of greater width and
area than provided in Section
2102, 2, 1 . 1 , above, the land, if divided,
shall be divided to provide lots,
maintaining the same common frontage and
o at -ion, conforming to 'th
requ-recaents for the district, except
that in the divi.oion one remaining lot
May be crelted having not les: than
r
Ir 4
a
ii..;
it 1 i at l•'ilx . . ; �ij'Yi ♦, c
.<. �.����i.i� i . ..._Wc'.'7•}�!���:�'SWNiiiti': ...:w�.. :t��,f; u..+..aa... .:+:�i4'c d.. . � � x
Sergio Rodriguez
r , ( ,
January 11, 1985
2102.2.1.2. Rule for Other Combinations of Lots.
cont.)
eighty percent (80p) of the width and
area generally required, or an
equivalent reduction may be distributed
among all or part of the lots so
created. In such cases, full district
yard requirements shall apply on all of
the lots.
GVC : r j
cc: Walter Pierce, Assistant City Manager
Joseph Genuardi, Zoning Administrator
Aurelio Perez-Lugones, Director, Planning
and Zoning Boards Administration
J-85-304
1/17/65
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF ORDINANCE
NO. 9500, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OE
MIAMI, FLORIDA, 8Y AMENDING SU88ECTION8
21_02.2.1.1 AND 2102.2.1.2 OF SECTION 2102
ENTITLED "NONCONFORMING LOTS," TO PROVIDE
THAT NONCONFORMING LOTS HTILI2IN6 THE
"EIGHTY PERCENT" EXCEPTION AND RULE FOR LOT
DIVISION MUST MAINTAIN THE SAME COMMON
FRONTAGE AND ORIENTATION AS THE PREVIOUS
LOTS; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE.
WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting
of March 6, 1985, Item No. 7, following an advertised hearing,
adopted Resolution No. PAB 29-85, by a 7 to 0 vote, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL of amending Ordinance No. 95000 as hereinafter set
forth; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission, after consideration of this
matter, deems it advisable and in the best interest of the
general welfare of the City of Miami and its inhabitants to grant
these amendments, as hereinafter set forth:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The text of Ordinance No. 9500, the Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, is hereby amended as
follows:l
"ARTICLE 21. NONCONFORMITIES
SECTION 2102. NONCONFORMING LOTS.
2102.2. Rules Concerning Combinations of Contiguous
Lots in the Same Ownership and with Common
Frontage.
2102.2.1. Combinations Required Where NonconfQrmity was
Created at Time of Passage or Amendment of
Ordinance; Exceptions.
1
Words and/or figured strict%en through shall be deleted:
Underscored words and/or figures. shall be added. The
remaining provisions are now in effect and remain unchanged.
AsterisXs indicate omiftgd and unchanged material,
21U2.2.1.1. exception; flighty percent (80%) kule
Applicable Whore Three Lots or Less ate
involved; Reduction in Bide Yard
Requirements by Class A Special Permit.
Whete the land in common frontage in the same ownership
is of suffidient width and area to provide at least
eighty percent (80%j of the width and area required for
three (3) lots or less in the district, it may be used
and/or divided to provide not to exceed three (3) lots,
i fib 3 i rS Hff trho AAmA enitlm6h frnhtadp and brientatiOn as
of the minimum width and area generally required by
district regulations.
2102.2.1.2. Rule for Other Combinations of Lots.
Where the land in common frontage in the same
ownership is of greater width and area than provided in
Section 21026261.1 above, the land, if divided, shall be
divided to provide lots, maintaining the same common
frontage and orientation as revious lots, contorming to
the requirements or t e district—` except that in the
division one remaining lot may be created having not
less than eighty percent (80%) of the width and area
generally required, or an equivalent reduction may be
distributed among all or part of the lots so created. In
such cases, full district yard requirements shall apply
on all of the lots.
Section 2. All ordinances, Code Sections, or parts
thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed insofar as they
are in conflict.
Section 3. Should any part or provision of this
Ordinance be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be
invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the ordinance
as a whole.
PASSED AND ADOPTED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this
day of , 1585.
PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND READING BY TITLE ONLY this
day of
ATTEST;
RALPH G. ONGIE
City Clerk
fil 1985.
MAURICE A. FERRE, Mayor
0000
t
PREPAP?ED ANb APPRbM 8Y t
P.
2�
EL 6 a MAXWEL
esistaht City Attorney
APPROVED A88,�' p f 1 AND Ct7RREC` NEE`
LUCIA, A. DOUGhER Y
City Attorney
- JEM/who/abJ402
3
15:
Randolph B. Rosencrantz March 11, 1985
City Manager
-,UajeeTI ORDINANCE - RECOMMEND APPROVAL
TEXT AMENDMENT - ART 21, SECTION 2102
SUBSECTIONS 2102.2.1.1 & 2102.2.1.2
Director `�`'E"` `� COMMISSION AGENDA - APRIL 18, 1985
Planning and Zoning Boards _•ic�csu„�� PLANNING AND ZONING ITEMS
Administration Department
It is recommended by the Planning
Advisory Board that amendments to
Zoning Ordinance 9500, as amended, by
amending Article 21, Nonconformities, _
Section 2102 Nonconforming Lots,
Subsections 2102.2.1.1 and 2102.2.1.2
be approved.
The Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of March 6, 1985, Item 7,
following an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution PAB 29-85 by a 7 to 0 —
vote, recommending approval of amendments to the text of Ordinance_9500, as
amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, by amending Article 21,
Nonconformities, Section 2102 Nonconforming Lots, Subsections 2102.2.1.1 and
2102.2.1.2 to provide that nonconforming lots utilizing this exception and
rule for lot division must maintain the same common frontage and orientation
as the previous lots.
Backup information is included for your review.
An ORDINANCE to provide for the above has been prepared by the City Attorney's -
Office and submitted for consideration of the City Commission.
����F�?�'r ��.p..�./'�..3,swtas{i�;�fNlM4.�r. i r1►j�j3i ixd'l?": x...
�+1�/�=�1�"tM-i?O+txli�tl'Y�•G4!�y,,. ,!IN •..i��.s;►�. � `�+�Ij�'�' y-�-�.��1�•�.��K...�. `o�;M:�yiltsr. .ir���t b. i�i'�.a= M� u.o. ,
PLANNING FACT SHEET
APPLICANT
City of Miami Planning Department:
February 12, 1985
PETITION
7. Consideration of text amendments to Ordinance
9500, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the
City of Miami, by amending Article 21
Nonconformities, Section 2102 Nonconforming
Lots, Subsections 2102.2.1.1 and 2102.2.1.2 to
provide that nonconforming lots utilizing this
exception and rule for lot division must
maintain the same common frontaae and
orientation as the previous lots. -
REQUEST
To prevent reorientation of nonconforming lots,
through a replatting process.
BACKGROUND
Where lots are nonconforming to Zoning Ordinance -
9500, Sections 2102.2.1.1 and 2102.2.1.2 allow
for replatting of up to three lots which
together meet 80% of the minimum width and area
required in the particular zoning district, into
up to 3 lots each of which meets 80% of the
minimum width and area required in the district.
ANALYSIS
Replatting of substandard lots is intended to
bring the lots closer to a conforming status;
not to confer a special privilege by reorienting
lots: These amendments will prevent re -facing
of these lots. If nonconforming lots can only
take advantage of the 80% rule by reorientation,
RECOIMMENDATIONS
PLANNING DEPT.
PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD
CITY COMMISSION
the replatting will be administratively denied.
Approval
At its meeting of March 6, 1985, the Planning
Advisory Board adopted Resolution PAB 29-85 by
a 7 to 0 vote, recommending approval of the above,
At its meeting of April 18, 1985, the City
Commission passed the above on First Reading,
PAB 3/6/8S
Item #7
PAce I
�0.
� ��{,+�i,M►lF6i�afi��,.�1�4�h':�lrlliiilrr�y'Sia+i+���;"�' � iCli .� ;a .�x ����`WrE,��,t , a �:a. - � t �, . �.
.'ftl:t1�•:�,�.�'Yyt ��':...M_•��.,JW�1:!�t.r`�,Jr+iFio.E:w�lllw:'C:�:..`1�+iAN'. �,wt..:�;r.h gat'4µ7iYs�'���-ilVi�l�..:!MF�� 'i!��►a�:.i..4 !y ^I•;;
I
Amendment to Ordinance 9600 - Article 210 Nonconformities
Section 1. The text of Ordinance 9500 as amended, th? Zoning Ordinance of
the City of Miami, Florida, is hereby amended as follows:
ARTICLE 21 NONCONFORMITIES
Section 2102 Nonconforminq Lots
"2102.2.1.1. Exception; Eighty Percent (80%) Rule Applicable Where Three Lots
or Less are involved; Reduction in Side Yard Requirements by
Class A Special Permit.
Where the land in commcn frontage in the same ownership is of sufficient
width and area to provide at least eighty percent (80%) of the width and area
= required for three (3) lots or less in the district, it may be used and/or
divided to provide not to exceed three (3)lots, maintaining the same common
frontage and orientation as previous lots, each with at Iea; eignty percent
:m of the minimum width and area generally required by district
regulations.
2102.2.1.2. Rule for Other Combinations of Lots. '
Where the land in common frontage in the same ownership is of greater
width and area than provided in Section 2102.2.1.1, above, the land, if
divided, shall be divided to provide lots, maintaining the same common
frontage and orientation as previous lots, conforming to the requ rer7en s for
e district, except_ at in the division one remaining lot may be created
having not less than eighty percent (80p) of the width and area generally
required, or an equivalent reduction may be distributed among all or part of
the lots so created. In such cases, full district yard requirements shall
apply on all of the lots."
fiords and/or figures stricken through shall be deleted. Underscored words
and/or figures shall be added, The rem4i ni ng provisions -ore n74 i n effect
and remain unchanged. Asterisks indicated omitted and unchanged material.
YPr
ri Yv� ►t�,-t'4',A-,4-Iaal�s«uitiwY�i11M4%i ��+• iakft�xtilm,W.13
i
'.Et�W11c; a. •µi .a s �{`,�.'�+•.k ,t�.a`l u.i �',1 iY `!Y Y Ci+�{M��.�r�w.i'4il.i:'.:.i •.i+ �.ii.��iM l�l.. :i4 i+'. ..a.... � �.
Sergio Rodriguez, Director
elanning Department
January 17, 1985
ATM Richard 0. Whipple Amendment to Ordinance 9500-
Article 21, "Non-Conformities'.—
r�
Cel rt
Donald`'`-- Lather
Director of Public Worsts
77
We request that your department initiate an amendment to Ordina-nce
9500 to clarify certain provisions contained in Article 21 - "Non -
Conformities". The amendment should read as follows:
2102.2.1.1. Exception; Eighty Percent (801A) ,Rule
Applicable Where Three Lots or Less are
involved; Reduction in Side Yard
Requirements by Class A Special Permit.
Where the land in common frontage in
the same ownership is of sufficient
width and area to provide at least
eighty percent (80A) of .the width and
area required for three (3) lots or
less in the district, it may be used
and/or divided to provide not to exceed
three (3) lots, maintaining the same
common frontage and orientation, each
with at least eighty percent(SO:11) of
the minimum width and area generally
required by district regulations.
2102. 2. 1 - 2. Rule for Other Combinations of Lots.
Where the land in common frontage in the
same ownership is of greater width and
area than provided in Section
2102.2.1.1, above, the land, if divided,
shall be divided to provide lots,
maintaining the same common frontage and
orientation, conforming tc the
reg4i. 44na for the district, except
that in the division one remaining lot
may be created having not leas :,than
Page 1 of 2
'. 0
•YyjAC;Nw:�i���i1i3a!��'{l',�, ..,;�yRY� ¢r���'SY �'Y�`M�tl�:k,Y.Vj�•�t :a r:,i�: l^.�!!!l DIY Y��'�1�_�°Si•,:; y�:. "ieR�X'i ,.,=.'1r.',,r: y>.. .: t :i1:!ti '. c,^ Y•. .�i •�. .
Y
r '
.":'t-,i-a�i,,�iir"s:►��:'G•�+i'•���irn7J.".1'i►'.�laY���'���!. ::f\sfil�,.f`, �{..M�:a:.!.�.C:if:'f:l'd!i�N►t:i': 1. t-":'•. h." ., - •s •... ..
iX
. a
Sergio Rodriguez January 17, 1985
Z102.2.1.2. Rule for Other Combinations of Lots.
cont.)
eighty percent (80%) of the width and area generally required, or an
equivalent reduction may be distributed
among all or part of the lots so
created. In such cases, full district
yard requirements shall apply on all of
the lots. —
GVC: rj
cc: Halter Pierce, Assistant City Manager
Joseph Genuardi, Zoning Administrator
Aurelio Perez-Lugones, Director, Planning
and Zoning Boards Administration
4
{
J-85-104
3/27/85
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF ORDINANCE
NO. 0500r THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OP
MIAMrr PLORIDA, BY AMENDING SUBSECTIONS
2102.2.1.1 AND 2102.2.1..2 OF SECTION 2102
ENTITLED "NONCONFORMING LOTS," TO PROVIDE
THAT NONCONFORMING LOTS UTILIZING THE
"EIGHTY PERCENT" EXCEPTION AND RULE FOR LOT
DIVISION MUST MAINTAIN THE SAME COMMON
FRONTAGE AND ORIENTATION AS THE PREVIOUS
LOTS; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE.
WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting
of March 6, 1985, Item No. 7, following an advertised hearing,
adopted Resolution No. PAB 29-85, by a 7 to 0 vote, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL of amending Ordinance No. 9500, as hereinafter set
forth; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission, after consideration of this
matter, deems it advisable and in the best interest of the
general welfare of the City of Miami and its inhabitants to grant
these amendments, as hereinafter set forth:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The text of Ordinance No. 9500, the Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, is hereby amended as
follows:l
"ARTICLE 21. NONCONFORMITIES
SECTION 2102. NONCONFORMING LOTS.
2102.2. Rules Concerning Combinations of Contiguous
Lots in the Same Ownership and with Common
Frontage.
2102.2.1. Combinations Required Where Nonconformity was
Created at Time of Passage or Amendment of
Ordinance; Exceptions.
* *
1
Words and/or figures stricken through shall be deleted.
Underscored words and/or figures shall be added. The
remaining provisions are now in effect and remain unchanged.
Asterisks indicate omitted and unchanged material,
10 0: 0
f
2 02.2.111. Uxeeptiot; eighty Percent (80%) Rule
Applicable there Three Lots or Less are
involved; Reduction in side Yard
Requirements by Class A Special Permit.
Where the land in common frontage in the game ownership
is of sufficient width and area to provide at least
eighty percent (80%) of the width and area required for
three (3) lots or less in the district, it stay he used
and/or divided to provide not to exceed three (3) lots,
or t e minimum width and area generally required by
district regulations.
2102.2.1.2. Rule for Other Combinations of Lots.
Where the land in common frontage in the same
ownership is of greater width and area than provided in
Section 2102.2.1.1 above, the land, if divided, shall be
divided to provide lots, maintaining the same common
frontage and orientation as revious lots, con orming to
the requirements or t e district, except that in the
division one remaining lot may be created having not
less than eighty percent (80%) of the width and area
generally required, or an equivalent reduction may be
distributed among all or part of the lots so created. In
such cases, full district yard requirements shall apply
on all of the lots.
Section 2. All ordinances, Code Sections, or parts
thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed insofar as they
are in conflict.
Section 3. Should any part or provision of this
Ordinance be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be
invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the ordinance
as a whole.
PASSED AND ADOPTED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this
18th day of April , 1985.
PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND READING BY TITLE ONLY this
day of 1985.
ATTEST:
RALPH G. ONGI
City Clerk
d
MAURICE A. FERREO Mayor
PREPARED AND APPROVED 9YI.
EIS E . MAXW L
asiatant City Attorney —
1
3i
APPROVED AS AND CORRECTNESS : L
LU IA. A. D 0 U G- -h- -E, RT Y
City Attorney
k
14
JSM/wpc/ab/402
3
i
MIAMI REVIEW
AND DAILY RECORD
Published Daily except Saturday, Sunday and
Legal Holidays
Miami, Dade County, Florida.
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF DADE:
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared
Sookie Williams, who on oath says that she Is the Vice President
of Legal Advertising of the Miami Review and Daily Record, a
daily (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) newspaper,
published at Miami in Dade County, Florida; that the attached
copy of advertisement, being a Legal Advertisement of Notice
In the matter of
CITY OF MIAMI
Re: ORDINANCE NO. 10000
In the ..... _ .. X. X. X.......... . ...... _ ....... Court,
was published In said newspaper In the Issues of
May 31, 1985
Alflant further says that the said Miami Review and Daily
Record is a newspaper published at Miami in said Dade County,
Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been
continuously published in said Dade County, Florida, each day
(except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) and has been
entered as second class mail matter at the post office In
Miami in said Dade County, Florida, for a period of one year
next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of
advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither
paid n mised any person, firm or corporation any discount,
rebat , co mission or refund for the purpose of securing this
adve is ant for publication in the aid newspaper.
t I 111 _ , . ya,•q
``<<��
9vv6m to and • ycfipad before me this
r
31St Q A.D.19. 85
R. Be J.3rooks
tiul} , State of Florida at Large
i ,1y•. .�gi7�ti
My AL)
ssI k b°i q# dtmd i g19 7��`�
MR 11119
WY OP MIAMI,
6A5166UNtV, Ri:1 R16A
LIk6AL II116 ift
All Interested per66ns will take nlfto thtit tin the 911Pti d6y 61 May,
1085, the City Corrinilasion of Miami, Firfridd, fidbptdd the 16116WIhg
titled brdihahcs(s): ,
ORDINANCE NO, 9993
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OR ZONING
NANCE NO.0W, THE TONING ORDINANCE OF TH
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA. BY AMENDING SECTION We
LISH METHODS OF SIGN CONSTRUCTION, PROHIBIT FLASH-
ING LIGHTS AND MOVING PARTS, REQUIRE ALL SIGNS TO
BE OF UNIPOD CONSTRUCTION WITH NO MORE THAN
TWO SIGN FACES, INTRODUCE A SIGN SPACING REWIRE.
MENT ALONG LIMITED ACCESS HIGHWAYS AND EXPRESS
WAYS, ALLOW OUTDOOR ADVERTISING SIGNS TO BE
VIEWED FROM AND LOCATED WITHIN 600 FEET OF LIM-
iTED ACCESSHIGHWAYS AND EXPRESSWAYS; AND CLAR.
IFYING APPLICABLE SIGN AREA °OF OUTDOOR ADV15MTIS-
ING SIGNS BY PROVIDING APPROPRIATE REVIEW STAND.
ARDS AND CONDITIONS AND: ESTABLISHING SPACING
REQUIREMENTS FOR OUTDOOR ADVERTISING SIGNS
ALONG FEDERAL -Alb PRIMARY HIGHWAY SYSTEMS; FUR.
THER, AMENDING PALS 5 OF THE OFFICIAL SCHEDULE
OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, CG GENERAL COMMERCIAL
ZONING DISTRICTS, BY REQUIRING SPECIAL EXCEPTION,
WITH CITY COMMISSION APPROVAL, FOR CERTAIN OUT-
DOOR ADVERTISING SIGNS; CONTAINING A REPEALER
PROVISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE: `
ORDINANCE NO.9094
AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION:63-161(3)
OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, 'AS
AMENDED, WHICH CREATED A SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR
THE USE OF THE CONVENTION CENTER PARKING GARAGE
(MUNICIPAL GARAGE NO. 4) BY CHANGING THE,RATE
SCHEDULE FOR THE USE AND OCCUPANCY OF AND THE
SERVICES FURNISHED OR TO BE FURNISHED IN CONNEC-
TIONVITH THE MIAMI CENTER AND PARKING GARAGE;
CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A' SEVERABIL-
ITY CLAUSE.
ORDINANCE NO.9995
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF ORDINANCE
NO.9500, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI,
FLORIDA, BY AMENDING SUBSECTION 2031.2,13 SE6, ION
2031- ENTITLED '"DRIVE-IN ESTABLISHMENTS; CAR.WASHES,"
TO REQUIRE.A SPECIAL EXCEPTION WITH APPROVAL BY
THE CITY COMMISSIONIF CAR WASHESJELLER WINDOWS
'OF DRIVE-IN BANKS; TICKET SELLING SPACES OF DRIVE-
IN THEATERS; OR OTHER DRIVE-IN -_FACILITIES, (INCLUD-
ING BUT.NOTLIMITED TO FOOD AND BEVERAGE:SALES,
AND, LAUNDRY AND;':DRY CLEANING-PICK•UP•STATIONS)
DO NOT PROVIDE THE MINIMUM .NUMBER OF RESERVOIR_
$PACES; FURTHER; AMENDING THE OFFICIALSCHED.ULE
OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS,, PAGES,3 AND 4'IN ZONING
DISTRICTS 04, AND CR4TO REQUIRE SPECIAL EXCEPTION, ;
WITH APPROVAL BY THE CITY COMMISSION, OF.;ALL DRIVE-.
IN FACILITIES THAT DO NOT PROVIDE THE MINIMUM NUM-
BER OF, RESERVOIR SPACES; CONTAINING 'A, REPEALER
PROVISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE.,:,!,
Atli ant further says that the said Miami Review and Daily
Record is a newsparer published at Wamt in said Cade County,
Florida, and that the said newspaper has heralolore been
continuously oublished in said Dade County. Florida, each day
lexcapl Saturday. Sunday and Legal Holidays) and has been
entered as second class mail matter at the post office in
Miami In said Dads County, Florida, lot a period of one year
next preceding the first publicatioh of the attached copy of
advertisement; and afflaht further saye that she has neither
paid ttp?#- p raised any person. firm at corporation any discount.
rebal co mission or refund lot the purpose of Owing this
adve Is ent for publica,fon In the aid newspaper.
!f fir'
�9weril 10 3lfd�4�$efAbed before me this
31St t 85
datol �. (�i {� .. , A.D. 19. .
"a-n
136tty J. .hooks
f jNuta ;Staler Florida a1 large
4.,
ISEAL) '� v
My C0mmiss16h4*re4 JLma I�iHk,��
MR 110
SPACES. t=URfiHtP., AMENDING THE OFFICIAL SCHEDULE
OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, PAGES,3 AND 41 IN 20NINO
DISTRICTS 6.1 AND ORA TO REOUIRE SPEL`IAL EXCEPTION,
WITH APPROVAL BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF ALL DRIVE•
IN FACILITIES THAT DO NOT PROVIDE THE WNIMUM NUM-
BER OF RESERVOIR SPACES; CONTAINING A REPEALER
PROVISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE.
ORDINANCE NO. §096
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONINO ATLAS OF ORDI-
NANCE NO.0966, THE 20NING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, PLORIDA, BY CHANGING THE 26NINO CLAW.
PICAT16N FOR THE AREA OtNERALLY BOUNDED BY THE
I.0 EXPRESSWAY META ORAIL AIGHTbF-WAY BOUTHWW
17TH ROAD, SOUTHWEST 20 AVENUE, A LM PARALLEL
TO AND APPROXIMATELY 210 FEET NORTHEAST OF SOUTH-
WEST 17TH ROAD AND SOUTHWEST 2ND COURT (MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCNIBED HEREIN), FROM At-2/2 ONE,
FAMILY DETACHEDD€1f 'SiDENTIAL'TO A6,116 RESIDENTIAL,
OFFICE; MAKING FINDINGS; AND BY MAKING ALL THE
NECESSARY CHANGES ON PAGE NO.37 OF SAID ZONING
ATLAS MADE A PANT OF ORDINANCE NO. 0500, BY REF-
ERENCE AND DESCRIPTION IN ARTICLE 3, SECTION, 300, ,
THEREOF; CONTAININGA REPEALEA.PROVISION,AND A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE.
ORDINANCE NO.9997
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF. ORDI-
NANCE NO. 9500, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASS)•,
FICATION OF APPROXIMATELY 16M SOUTHWEST 2ND AVE,;
NUE, MIAMI, FLORIDA (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
HEREIN) FROM RS•2l2 ONE -FAMILY DETACHED RESIDEN-
TIAL TO AO-3/6 RESIDENTIAL -OFFICE, MAKING FINDINGS;
AND BY MAKING ALL,THE NECESSARY CHANGES ON PAGE
NO, 37 OF SAID ZONING ATLAS MADE A PART OF ORDI-
NANCE NO. 9500, BY REFERENCE AND DESCRIPTION IN
ARTICLE 3, SECTION 30,0, THEREOF; CONTAINING A
REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE.
ORDINANCE NO.9998
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDI-
NANCE NO. 9500, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSI-
FICATION FOR THE AREA GENERALLY BOUNDED BY
SOUTHWEST 2ND COURT, SOUTHWEST 15TH ROAD, SOUTH-
WEST 1ST AVENUE AND A LINE PARALLEL TO AND APPROX-
IMATELY 115-160 FEET SOUTHWEST,OFSOUTHWESTI5TH .
ROAD (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN), FROM
RG 215 GENERAL. RESIDENTIAL'TO.R0-315 RESIDENTIAL,
OFFICE; MAKING" FINDINGS;`'AND`BY MAKING'AL'L`THE—
NECESSARY CHANGES ON PAGE NO. 37 OF SAID ZONING
ATLAS MADE A PART OF ORDINANCE NO. 9500, BY REF-
ERENCE AND DESCRIPTION IN ARTICLE 3, SECTION 300,
THEREOF; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE.
ORDINANCE NO.9999
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDI-
NANCE NO..9500, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, BY CHANGING THE ZONINGCLASSI•:
FICATION FOR THE; AREA GENERALLY BOUNDED -BY
SOUTHWEST-2ND -AVENUE,' SOUTHWEST!l7TH;ROAD,
SOUTHWEST, IST AVENUE'AND A LINE PARALLEL To AND.
APPROXIMATELY.390.FEET NORTHEAST.OF SOUTHWEST .
17TH'ROAD, MIAMI;; FLORIDA.`(MORE,.PARTICULARLY.
DESCRIBED HEREIN) FROM RG-2/5 GENERAL` RESIDENTIAL ,: „
TO RO.1I5 RESIDENTIAL -OFFICE; MAKING FINDINGS;'AND
BY MAKING ALL THE: NECESSARY CHANGES'ON'PAGE'
NO 37 OF -SAID ZONING ATLAS MADE.A PART OFrORDI-
NANCE NO. 9500, BY REFERENCE'AND DESCRIPTION: IN
'ARTICLE.3,'`SECTION 300; THEREOF; CONTAINING "A
REPEALER PROVISION AND ASEVERABILITY.;CLAUSE.
ORDINANCE NO-10000
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT, OF::,ORDINANCE
NO. 9500, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF.MIAMI,
FLORIDA, BY''AMENDING"SUBSECTIONS"2162.2.1,1 AND
2102,2.1.2. OF SECTION 2102ENTITLED "NONCONFORMING''
LOTS," TO PROVIDE THAT NONCONFORMING LOTS UTI-
LIZING THE "EIGHTY' PERCENT'' EXCEPTION AND RULE':
FOR LOT DIVISION MUST. MAINTAIN THE SAME COMMON
FRONTAGE AND ORIENTATION AS THE PREVIOUS'LQTS;
CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A :SEVERAI514-
ITY CLAUSE,
ORDINANCE, No.10001
AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE ESTASLISHING:TWO NEW
SPECIAL, REVENUE' FUNDS ENTITLED "RENTAL REHABIL:
1TATION PROGRAM 19$4 AND ':'RENTAL'REHAE41TA-
TION PROGRAM -- 1905", APPROPRIATING' FUNDS FOR
THE OPERATION OF SAME IN THE AMOUNTS ':OI¢ 6,01XI .
+rernla r .r +rr>r+rr , ,ar.•.. + .r.r � ��•
OF HOUSING 'AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND AUTHOR*
IZINO THE CITY MANAGER TO ACCEPT THE QRA,NT AWARD
FROM 'T'H9'UNITED'`67ATES DEPARTWNTQKF HOUOINO
AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND TO ENTER INTO THE
NECESSARY CONTRACT(S) ANDIOR ArjR69�! 9Ntj$) fQR
THIR `ACCEPTANCE OF THE GRANT04, CONTAINING A
RgPgALIR PROOVISION AND A SEVERAOILITI(hAalSfa'
R4PH Q; ONGIE
CITY CLBRK
► CITY OF MIAM4.40IiIDA
31 ,,�>!M