Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
O-10012
J-85-174 ORDINANCE NO....:O..i.:.." AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE NO, 9500j THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF APPROXIMATELY 3151-3155 SOUTHW88T 27TH AVENUE, 2660 LINCOLN AVENUE and 2699 TIGERTAIL AVENUE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN) FROM RG-2/6 GENERAL RESIDENTIAL PD-MU PLANNED DEVELOPMENT MIXED USE; SUBJECT TO THE APPLICANT OBTAINING NECESSARY VARIANCES; MAKING FINDINGS; AND BY MAKING ALL THE NECESSARY CHANGES ON PAGE NO. 45 OF SAID ZONING ATLAS MADE A PART OF ORDINANCE NO. 9500 BY REFERENCE AND DESCRIPTION IN ARTICLE 3, SECTION 300, THEREOF; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. Is WHEREAS, the Miami Zoning Board, at its meeting of March 18, 1985, Item No. 61 following an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution No. ZB 48-85, by a 6 to 3 vote, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of a change of zoning classification, as hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, the City Commission after careful consideration of this matter deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami and its inhabitants to grant this change of zoning classification as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The Zoning Atlas of Ordinance No. 9500, the zoning ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, is hereby amended by changing the zoning classification of approximately 3151-3199 Southwest 27th Avenue, 2660 Lincoln Avenue and 2699 Tigertail Avenue, Miami, Florida, more particularly described as Lots 1 through 6, Block F, AMENDED PLAT OF NEW BISCAYNE (B-16) with approval of the development plans on file and with the voluntary dedication of the west 20' of Lots 1, 2,'3, 4, 5 and 6 plus a 25' radius returning at the intersection of Southwest 27th Avenue with Lincoln Avenue and Tigertai. Avenue of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, from RG-2/6 Genera. Residential. to PA -MU Planned Development Mixed Use subject to the applicant obtaining necessary variances. Section 2. It is hereby found that this Zoning clasai- iication change: (a) 18 in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood plan; (b) 18 not contrary to the established land use pattern; (c) Will not create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts; (d) 1s not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the City; (e) Will not materially alter the population density pattern or increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilities, streets, etc.; (f) Is necessary due to changed or changing conditions; (g) Will not adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood; (h) Will not create or excessively increase traffic congestion or otherwise affect public safety; (i) Will not create a drainage problem; (j) Will not seriously reduce light and air to adjacent area; (k) Will not adversely affect property values in the adjacent area; (1) Will not be a deterrent to the improvement or develop- ment of adjacent property in accord with existing regulations; (m) Will not constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with protection of the public welfare; Section 3. Page No. 45 of the Zoning Atlas, made a part of Ordinance No. 9500 by reference and description in Article 3, Section 300 of said Ordinance, is hereby amended to reflect the changes made necessary by these amendments. Section 4. All ordinances, code sections, all parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed insofar as they are in conflict. Section 5. Should any part or provision of this Ordi- nance be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the.ordinance as a whole, PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this 1 day of April. { 1905. 7 _ _.. • 11A`•1l. .71-01210A Randolph B. Rosencrantz :ATE. March 21, 1985 Ci Manager au®JECT ORDINANCE - RECOMMEND APPROVAL ' APPROX 3151-3199 SW 27 AVE, 2660 LINCOLN AVE & 2699 TIGERTAIL AVE Qio, re — 4EFERENCZS! Director Planning and Zoning Boards ENCL„SURE_COMMISSION AGENDA - APRIL 18, 1985 Administration Department PLANNING AND ZONING ITEMS It is recommended that the Change of Zoning Classification in the Official Zoning Atlastof Zoning Ordinance 9500, as amended, from RG- 2/6 General Residential to PD-MU • Planned Development - Mixed Use for the property located at approxi- mately 3151-3199 SW 27 Avenue, 2660 Lincoln Avenue and 2699 111:gerta_T7 Avenue, wit'th approvaT of the eveo-pment plans on file, be approved. The Zoning Board, at its meeting of March 18, 1985, Item 6, following an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution ZB 48-85 by a 6 to 3 vote, recommending approval of the Change of Zoning Classification in the Official Zoning Atlas of Zoning'Ordinance 9500, as amended, from RG-2/6 General Residential to PD-MU = Planned Development - Mixed Use for the property located at approximately 3151-3199 SW.27 Avenue, 2660 Lincoln Avenue and 2699 Tigertail Avenue, also described as Lots 1 through 6, Block F, AMENDED PLAT OF NEW BISCAYNE (B-16)2 with approval of the development plans on file and with the voluntary dedication of the west 20' of lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 plus a 25' radius return at the intersection of SW 27 Avenue with Lincoln Avenue and Tigertail Avenue. NOTE_; This application also requires the approval of a Variance from Article 12, Section 1205, and Article 9, Subsection 906.3 (providing 15' of 25' required external yards) and a Variance from Article 12, Section 1206 and Article 6, Subsection 606,2,6, providing an east side residential yard of 6,66' (10' required). Four objections received in the mail; four opponents present at the meeting. Two replies in favor received in the mail; nine proponents present at the meeting. 1 01 i y_�x.�. t.'.ti'i-44•+?•t;';Z1��4�,�,Nk'•.:zrl'�'»1f�;•7VR�A:�'A!t'S"�.:�.C'`''� ,.'!�?f!..J..'. � :�t i'� Randolph B. Rosencrantz Page 2 March 21, 1985 Backup information is included for your review. An ORDINANCE to provide for the above has been prepared by the City Attorney's Office and submitted for consideration of the City Commission. AEPL:l l l cc: Law Department NOTE: Planning Department recommends: DENIAL a ....� •:. ..I. :4 +:..W. � t'r".•i 1`i• :•.�. 1. r'.'. .a.� u . .•i: W :i i.. YG •.�.:i!.•W',j i:✓—rY +Cii)� h. \ l - r r � • �. •� • r .. � .+'W.1.7•w v: Yi Or. ;�� ,r ' na • �.. 4 i ..,t.4:i ,.r ��'�- a . ...t. ZONING FACT SHEET LOCATION/LEGAL Approximately 3151-3199 SW 27 Avenue and 2660 Lincoln Avenue and 2699 Tigertail Avenue Lots 1 through 6 Block F AMENDED PLAT OF NEW BISCAYNE (8-16) APPLICANT/OWNER David Welsh 2410 Prairie Avenue Miami Beach, FL 33140 Phone # 534-1128 Walter A. Mobley 3300 Rice Street, #6 Miami, FL 33133 Phone # 442-9807 Frances M. Stein 190 Atlantic Avenue Garden City Park, NY 11040 Phone # (513)248-6353 Coconut Grove Investments Corp. c/o Homero De La Torre Delta Shoe Corp. 501 SW 37 Avenue Miami, FL 33135 Phone # 442-9807 Kenneth M. Myers (Attorney for Owners) 1428 Brickell Avenue Miami, FL 33131 Phone 371-9041 ZONING RG-2/6 General Residential REQUEST Change of Zoning Classification in the Official Zoning Atlas of Zoning Ordinance 9500, as amended, to PD-MU Planned Development -Mixed Use, on above site, with approval of the development plans on file. - MOTE: This application also requires the approval of a Variance from Article 12, Section 1205, and Article 9, Subsection 906.3 (providing 15' of 25' required external yards) and a Variance from Article 12, Section 1205 and Article 6, Subsection 606,2.6, providing an east side residential yard of 6,66' (10' required). l 01 ',� j(1�.�."C1'491�il1M���'•!�`'��•�q�!�17�?NitjE�R �'�"i'RitTF�1w'.L`�l*�•��j'���k+`:�� i.Y.l "y� Ci+•�,hx: �••T.+^w�i`s�.�iiJ�iii L �."C2����-�L�.'���.1"'.jC�tcti�"'°O�iC�i�si+.,.t�.w�YM*.'S��o*•D��'� •''�rsxh.��1�� _. .... �i °' . ... .� iti.�l , r RECOMMENDATIONS HISTORY OF RECOMMENDATIONS AND ACTIONS ZONING BOARD MEETING 6/7/82 REQUEST: Change of Zoning from R-4 (Medium Density Multiple) to R-C (Residential Office) of Lots 3 to 6, Block F. PLANNING DEPARTMENT: DENIAL. Office use is contrary to the Miami ompre ensive Plan and constitutes a precedent that would threaten the residential area on 27th Avenue, Day Avenue and Tigertail Avenue. The City Commission in rezoning the land south of this site and Bayshore Drive created a 100' deep buffer zone along Tigertail to protect against office impacts. ZONING BOARD: ZONING BOARD MEETING 6/21/82 ZONING BOARD: Deferred Recommended approval. Res. ZB 109-82. CITY COMMISSION MEETING 7/29/82 FIRST READING: Denied. M 82-751. `I CURRENT RECOMMENDATION(S) AND ACTIONS) I r] -s�:Q�';iA�.y'.s.1c�.�►s�i�lk�`t'�"i�,'rh.�ik �x� �«r t,� t�rY tit..YtYI li�il�a .+.6�".3'�"��4''ti�tiawd:. tl(. rd!'a� �}�,� 1 . r •-+�,'�M; `it e13!��•:.t...:_ ,�,.W':�'NayY. ru .. rj�. .:r�a `.` �.i�C'�N -i.; ,..��.i��lY'ub"ti�i-,J�yJ+.'�Ss":i'Tf�f.r Sp:;jGi+'�N:9 �!aY�.J�R�'ii` ,. M PLANNING DEPARTMENT DENIAL. Although the mixed use planned eAve1 opment is encouraged by the department, the proposed development as presented in concept form does not sufficiently meet the intent of the Planned Development Districts. Although a unified development is proposed, it does not "accomplish the purposes of zoning and other applicable regulations to the same degree as in districts in which regulations are intended to control development on a lot -by -lot rather than unified basis." The project as proposed does not "promote an improved level of amenities, appropriate and harmonious variety in physical development, creative design and a better environment." We do not find that the garage facilities associated with the service station are appropriate in relation to the residential development on site and surrounding the subject site. Although meeting minimum requirements the siting of residential component of the project is sandwiched between the office development and existing multi -family development. The "impact and convenience" of the residential portion of the development does not provide a greater degree of livability that would be expected through a planned development. The proposed height of the project when related to existing development and future development controlled by the SPI-3 overlay district is not in keeping with developmentalong SW 27th Avenue. The facade treatment particularly along 27th Avenue needs relief in the form of additional landscaping, breaks in the facade treatment and additional amenities related to the street. The scale of the front elevation and its height need to provide for visual separation and other scaling devices to distinguish window and door fenestrations along with the horizontal components. PUBLIC WORKS Request the dedication of the west 20' of lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 plus 25' radius returning at the intersection of SW 27 Avenue with Lincoln Avenue and Tigertail Avenue. 11 1Q01 ' a � �'i . `Wi+. ��. �1,•�.r+"`���V—..x4 �.^�. �i'is�.!�.�' +�.+ •i�F�k+�fC�j�a.�1 .�F�Vi����i :��.iti+y�ht e,�j�i►.� �.:.i�i;�!.��:,� r, �'!�:~.r�=�'++�'?..�..-�i`�t�G�'►4�1�.��.�it+l'r*R:.r,•.aif'4q'Ltfl��''�3."!�:'!`?+�.:±1 .Su°i";`,;.�•�1� � �+�cy►�iuy3wayiM,� .. DADE COUNTY TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION Loaded twin truck bays on Lincoln Avenue will likely block visibility of and to pedestrians. More on -site stacking should be provided for gas pumps. ZONING BOARD At its meeting of March 18, 1985, the Zoning Board adopted Resolution ZB 48-85 by a 6 to 3 vote, recommending approval of the above with approval of the development plans on file and with the voluntary dedication of the west 20' of lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 plus a 25' radius returning at the intersection of SW 27 Avenue with Lincoln Avenue and Tigertail Avenue. T ��M!+'�'S� 1'wrC+1 i y. -k� '85 MAY -9 P 3 24 May 8, 1985 Miles Moss and Associates, Inc Counsulting Engineers 12900 S.W. 84th Street Miami, Florida 33183 RE: Tigertail Professional Building Traffic Impact Study, April, 1985 Gentlemen: The Planning Department has received and made a preliminary review of the subject report. While we generally agree with the report's conclusion that the traffic impact of the proposed development would be minimal, the report fails to present and develop sufficient logic to fully explain and support such a conclusion. In particular, the following points need to be addressed in detail: 1. The Trip Generation estimates shown in Exhibit I appear to be low. The report, indicates. that the estimates are based on rates published by the ITE in its "Trip Generation Rates" report/manual, but does not explain the methodology used to apply these values to the proposed development, except on a gross square -footage basis. A more complete discussion of trip generation estimating technique needs to be made. 2. The report states that "approximately 25% of the proposed trip ends will be internal to the site itself and therefore are not new trips" (page 5). An explanation of this assumption needs to be made, outlining the logic used to reach the conclusion. It should be borne in mind that the proposed development would contain, at most, some 30 residential dwelling units and perhaps as few as 20, depending on market conditions when the building nears completion. Finally, the error in Exhibit I which shows 2% Internal Trips instead of 25% should be corrected, 31 The report states that the P.M. peak .period was used for analysis because.it "was higher than other times of the day". However, the Page i of 2 A •i..° �'>,.1'.i,; ' 11 � ,K� r� w� 1 :li . ^{I :'!11?4'1 lile}:lit. 'i4t11J� , iIwd ,lr. 1. �y�.,;,,., - H �:1 ,•{► - •,�•-G/'� ' rt llla 1*:iteiil •.b!:.�+:r��.�7 '#L 0 .1'. t "" Miles Moss and Associates May 8, 1989 hourly counts for Tigertail Avenue as presented in the report's Appendix show nearly twice the volume on Tigertail during the 8-9 A.M. hour than any other hour of the day. This apparent contradiction needs to be explained. 4. The Appendices, as presented by the report, are not meaningful without further explanation. For example, no definitions are given for the various labels used in the "Critical Movement Analysis" printouts, nor is the meaning of the "1 hour, 1 channel vehicle count" tables immediately preceding them explained. 5. The methodology utilized to obtain the turning movements shown in the report should be explained. In addition, the narrative should include a more complete discussion of the significance of the turning volumes as related to determination of level -of -service standards. Points I and 2, above, are especially critical to the report, as the assumptions developed therein drive the remainder of the calculations in support of the conclusions reached. It is essential that a complete explanation and justification of the estimates be presented in substantially greater detail than the report now offers. We look forward to receiving you revised report so we may complete our review. Please direct your resubmittal to Mr. Clark P. Turner, Transportation Planner, for this Department. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please.call Mr. Turner at 579-6086. Sincerely, Scrgro Rodriguez, Directow Manning Department SR/CPT/ss cc; Aurelio E. Perez-Lugones, Director Planning and Zoning Boards Administration Page 2 of 2` tr - Asa ' r j+ s bill %ow PQVad 0- ac: E S o"O" 10 N A L -pu 1 jm 2 cam m=v,omo I I D N nm a � TRAFFIC IMPA(:T STUDY ATES, INC a ! 3 e'„ 0 J� W I TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. _ Executive Summery 1 Technical Report I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2 II. STUDY OBJECTIVE 2 — III. EXISTING TRAFFIC AND BACKGROUND GROWTH 4 IV. ROADWAY'IMPROVEMENTS 4 V. TRAFFIC: GENET% I AUN 5 VI. DIRECIZONAL DISTRIBUTION 5 V:I. INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS 9 VIII. SUMMARY ANU CONCLUSIONS 9 • t 10 4 1 , . s . { '> ';I. c? t �iiw�� :�L� tiN i�!� 1MI ► -� d +if ' 3E rl�tt ttt�# i2 wow W?i —4-,i,i . Y`�Y►P'ti'1 'ir.Al\4�t:•. :" .�, • �.;�Y�i�ii::i 7�rA.�. ' :!�4 t �+Tf �S �' A�: �r tiu•'. • .4%,Aft4�t;f�:'�Gt4: ��i': old �i7+r7YiT�:i4�.�+3►T?ii':?T..+� �'af�w'Vwi�r�t�,::Y� LI5T OF FIGURE:, Fiqure No.. Page No. Fiqure 1 - LOCATION MAP 3 Fiqure 2 - PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES S.W. -17 Ave. & Bayshore Dr. 10 Fiqure 3 - PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES S.W. 27 Ave. _5 Tigertai l Ave. 11 Fiqure 4 - PM PEAK HOUR VO:.UMES S.W.7 Ave. & Lincoln Ave. 12 Fiqure 5 - PM PEAK H011R vnLUMES S.W. Ave. & FsLrd Ave. 13 L13T OF EXHIST'rS Exhibit No. Paqe No. Exhibit - TRIP GZ1JFPA'410N 6 Exhibit. - AM PEAK SITE L-13 RIBUTIt7N 7 Exmizt 3 - PM PEAK SITE u13TKIEUTION 3 Exhibit -t iNTcF:. c+:; iu:i CAPACITY ANALY•;I.; 14 LiS T OF APPENDt,:L• PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC ZOUNT,S AVERAGE DAMY TRAFFIC COUNTS CAPACITY AN4;.v,515 CAL ULA T ICNS ►.�h0m 4tps 0 f >.s,�I�I�lttk'1j�"ct'.t1.Zl�S4'�.i'�II�+�Sil�:�'f�.'�tyYM*/�.�'f4►.�'?F!t�,ik:'i:(�..ir,!��Yti.•'it;�.5'+`a`�►;i:4'➢V:i�pia�M•�i•�Y, , EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AOL nx�ilil�Slt3�'�et1E�:Y�, a ;t .!a i..a�•. �� � a4p.lMy�kgtti!�1'�1Y.sl'.7wsssti�.��L+�.� •iV'',��.. .,, wi.�l�� .k� .: /, ..� • .. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The proposed Tip-jertail Professional Buildinq consists of 60,000 Sq. Ft. ox muiti-use area. This proposed pro3ect contains the ioilowinq :nixed use iacilities: A. 50,000 Sq. Ft. of office space. B. 10,000 Sq. Ft. of mixed commercial use (i.e. hair _ - dressers, travel agency and walk up case, etc.) - C. 20.000 Sq. Ft. of residential use, consisting of 16 awellinq units. The results of the analysis prepared for this proposed buildinq demonstrates tteat there will ba no adverse impact to rr<a3or intersections in proximity to this site. The four (4) intersections studicu for this report ar.=: i. :S.W. 27 Ave. e.. isird Ave. 2. tiv,a. t.. Lincoln Ave. 3. S.W. 27 Ave. Tigertail Ave. 2"7 evF_. i�aysnore Dr, - } Each of these intersections will operate at a satisfactory level of servit a. 13 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The proposed T 1 -:1 e r t a 1. 1 Professional Buildincz consists of 60,000 Sq. Ft, ox multi -use area. This proposed project contains the followinc4 mixed use iacillLies: A. 50,000 Sq. Ft. of oifica space. B. 10.000 Sq. Ft. of mixed commercial use (i.e. hair dressers, travel agency and walk up cafe. etc.) C. 20,000 Sq. Ft. of residential use, consisting of 16 awellinq units. The results of the analysis prepared for this'proposed buildinq demonstrates ttidt there will be no aciverse impact to major inter3eCtions in proximity to this site. The four (4) intersectioi,ta studi=u f,.-Nr this tepart ar"_: 1. W. 27 Ave. t. �.rd Ave. 2. :.iW. 27 Ave. t. Liticoln Ave. 3. S.W. 27 Ave. Ti,;%:#rtai1 :eve, W. ;47 I%vft. Baysnore Dr. Each Of these LnLarse-ctlona will operate at a satisfactory of 4o"Oftt A_�. �.. hi .aY. +ri�:r',i,:, a.Y•v9.�loT�:�y.'%'��+�ir'Yi�Y�S;:��� - .. .. .. .. .. � .. GXEC!ITIVE SUMMARY The proposed Tiqertail Professional B uildinq consists of 80,000 Sq. Rt. os multi -use area. This proposed project contains the foilowiny mixed use iaeilities: A. 50,000 Sq. rt. of oifice space. B. 10,000 Sq. Ft. of mixed commercial use (i.e. hair dressers, travel agency and walk up cafe, etc.) C. 20,000 Sq. Fr.. of residential use, consisting of 16 awellinq units. The results of the analysis prepared for this proposed buildinq demonstrates tr,at there will ba no adverse impact to major inter3ectlons in proximity to this site. The lour (4) inreraectivtj5 %tudl=u for this teport arr: 1. :;.W. 7 Ave. r.. :i.rd Ave. -_ 2. a.W. 27 Ave, L. Lincoln Ave. 3. S.W, 27 Ave. . T as;yrtall tkve. 4. 3-W. 27 Ave. Baysnore Dr. Each of these ntararctions will operate at a satisfactory level of service. ..a.# % i y ������.1tiL::'i1rtJ,w'+•��T^R7C�'�M{a;`1i�!!i�..!",°.'�i,:y�,!f'q',yli":•0.+�:1:��'�1r�a�,`l�d•'��it���'.4�:+s t'fi+c ..�:a'.ir?j•.�t'r 4t ib �,t ..ry1,�y.?.S �i�'t'rx i l j 1 7 l r '3 :1 TECHNICAL REPORT TECHNICAL REPORT I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Tigertail Professional Building is a proposed multi -use facility consistinq of the following useage: A. 50,000 Sq. Ft, office space. B. 20,000 Sq. Ft. residential. 16 units. C. 10,000 Sq. Ft. commercial (planned useage will be i.e., walk up cafe, hair dresser, travel agency, etc.). The site of this development will be located in the Soutn East quadrant of the intersection of S.W. 27 Ave. and Lincoln Ave., in Coconut Grove. (See Figure 1). This development is expected to be completed by June I986. II. STUDY OBJECTIVE The obiecti•te of this traffic study is to assess the impact of the trdific generated to and from this project, Qn the surrounainy public_ roads and determine any adverse conoltions that may e'�ccur to the existing roadway network. v y :iaPM:it'kUM�t.'.I(,�t!a'.':. �i.`•i�""L'.ir"1 Y 9:+r-. t\+ +f♦ °Owe 1 - 3 FIGURE I +I� LOCATION MAP < sti >�II sr �' 1"1'�V it u u t _ 1-..•ST _ •. .. tt a = .•astTEAS u SicMrNA.2 c� )1 2zit- fONSEtA + t Si� flStvtk"UA St115 I1 1 Sl OWEDO 1 _ SE ti ti 1AM" � 1AAll N t ti ANIIOUERtt► ! ! St c GlAd IA 9 IER i 10 SI SANh�IANf 10 Sr It ST Y. PMOFNETU It ST II ST 11 IEN• R WIL A I? t 12 Sr a it IJ I IS )r IT S1 y00NIA _ IJ iCA o =.SAIAMANIa - SI II SI I/ �S1 II SI � MINOR[S 1/ St Ib T SI 16 li St tAMORA-- 1E16 ru ADEINA-r,��N-�� 16rA !Iw l6-CN 16 MAiUNG 11 it 11 Sr < 11 rER u t f - 11 rFR� NArAAAE EL" II st r E II -Si MIMUNLA V• Id-Sf•"�� 4`• ` 19 5 19 )1 {zr. -;-�A�lAkIRIUuAit.AOiONAA A 1'f�C�21 �.•r el I 19 iE !0 ST Pit �14 SRT \ E� - T 1 q 21 St it ST IER IEi @MIRACLE MICE CORAL MIAI SW 22 Si 1� •AN1AtU5M AVE --22 TER 22 = TEI ' AVE 21 21 ST s� �iAlENC1A�•� SI -AIYtRiA. A_il AVEtEA� 9 2i TEA 2l S1 21 ST H f PALERMO, \ Awl 11 IER 2t _ TER i/ !ER GAl1A/10 1'• AVl ST ; 15 ST MAIAIJ 4`►.� i Is IER .ANlANDER AVE I_': , TER 25 IER N 26 N St i r``a 2sAm 0 so SERAytal.- '1 16 _ S1 Ii )l ,; E�^ y TER ROMANO _ --'r.•26. IER " " i .=. '—. i �`_; : u l6 (Sf ANOtA-OR iAR10--�}� ArE�'I Ii ` TI!'. SECOFFEEyrst `� r _ ST - - m r < CAMIlO�I Aid +2) .7 ti rr N M' I 1C A i io� cf bA01YA "yE 2;t ^ AIt ALWO tM N,I gyp, TIUVIA tgC�ItA C r v i i �XLk �� '�t '�` *,t �.�'s `.�i.\►o I I CO ONUI-AVE 9 / �k, P�/'�, P \s `�S••t+ I(IANUI• i a 1 j IRADE AvE y*�, r' • !•s ��Y/]f/, ` s .` r 1 tUtIO ROAD WO,AYE ,• i4 r IAIA)0. AVE��%,/ � 1/♦ Q? •♦ R. _ lk ' ^ •+ .uw Awl ` .� t ' 1 �- i '� I I. UAANGE •SI••+ COCONUT t GROVE-, ,i, + S:�Y►N11 Al Qs� s i OAF AVl a i -- �'Do =.E.a" AVt 1 1 -fflu � ,1lORI0A.... AV(.'1y.,., 14ir - '2,-. ; , •" �' - s PROPOSED SITE >7 r - t i00( i .1 I i .w� ..... w... -I/I�.�LCu:::l.�'.,ry."'9.'„�T'�STi1� �o a�+'!rs7 1•�� +FrS.. Pi+a ��. 1�k.f•} r�.a. +ar' x�e if,' . .: i~.. !'!;`�•�•� . Yi. '`-i3F. '9Pey CI. '4.�U;' +!1 _ III. EXISTING TRAFFIC AND 8AVKGROUND GROWTH Review of historical 24-hour traffic counts for this area from the Metropolitan Dade County Public Works Department, revealed little indication of existing traffic or information to determine background growth on the surrounding roads. It was necessary to perform the tasks of providing this data to complete a comprehensive analysis of traffic in _ this area. southwest 27 Ave. and it's intersecions with Bird Ave., Lincoln Ave., Tigertaii Ave., and Bayshore Dr., were all analyzed durinq both A.M. ana P.M. peak periods by periorming manual turning movement approach counts. The existing neighborhood character is primarLly residential, with a projected yearly qrowth of less than 2% per year. This information was received from the Metro Dade County Puolic Works Dept. V. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS The Metro Dace County Public Works Dept. was contacted n regaras to n proposea widening project alonq S.W. 27 Ave. etveerl U.S. 1 sr:,l lisyshore Dr., as this portion is part of ne uaee County t;,rimary Roaaway System. It was determined hat a wideninq of a'.W. 27 Ave. is planned for the year 1990, a part of the secondary road funding. At this time, no finds have been appropriated for this project. The project taslf will be a 4ompinwo effort of both Dade County and the ity of Miami.. w4 w h+iIdNJti$t1 1lifriiPtti:i►slit,; _..w... .....:. �►t•i..i� a V, TRAFFIC GENERATION The projected traffic volumes for the A.M. and P.M. peak hours were Calculated sot this project using accepted trip generation rates published in the Third Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' "Trip Generation Rates", report/manual. The rates for land use codes 711, 620, and for office, commercial and residential respectively were used. Accorasng to utudles substantlatea by the Institute of Transportation Etiyi►iccrs, approximately 25% u% the proposed trips ends will be internal to the site itself and therefore are not new trips. This adjustment is reflected in the trsttic impact for the proposed site. The external generation figures are displayed in Exhibit 1. Vi. DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION Metropolitan Davie County, through the Miami Urban Area Transportation Study (MUATS), has divided Dade County into traffic cones, "he travel dlsLrlbuLlon forecasts for the' zone ill whtan tte T,gertsil Professional Building is located were obtainer ircim the ldtle Countyi�uGlic Works Dept. ThI3 distribution wtxs 114eo, conalaerinq the exlstinq area public road network, Lu jerarm.Lne the land mnd the generated traffic ana it'z Xmpa`t. The A.M. and P,11, site diatributton is diapl.ayed in Extsrbit: . and 3, _ .. .mom.. EXHIBIT I TRIP GENERATION (VPH)* AM FREAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR i?: OUT TOT IN OUT TOT 50.000 Sq. Ft. Cfi:ce 106 19 125 21 120 141 1.0.000 Sq. Ft. Commercial 15 14 29 72 72 144 .v.000 Sq. Ft. ResioenLiAl 2 e 8 2 8 10 Total 123 39 Lass 2% =nt ernal ?rips Total 'J3 30 162 95 200 295 122 71 .6s 150 221 E r . i ta:.w.,3:f:M:%!4tii+t�r�;�,i''R,4��Jr�:j:��tr �.'.'?�.':'�.4'.w�F�►�:;�1'; i:�41 a��:hirr f:'►,'Nrf: 4 _ ri... �f'. •... :s x. !�ri�i �fr�: ��iri.�,'.�.,�7�_T�S�• r EXHtSIT 2 AM PEAK SITE DtSTRt8UTtON *(VPH) UI r N 7 w7w /_�' /,eD A Y,5, L��'c.:.�,�•' Arc' 7T /tr e,P T,piG ,a yE. I-A4 Qom. ol Y .S w.!` �� �, • ,y�,���.y� G. M � h Y.I�i41.�•, ���� it'�M� ��i.Zl'�'O. ��IA'A� i�/y c i t i �';�ri...�?' 'e•�.�-� .i�1M�FC r,�-�: �Il?F..�4'�''�ye ''�;. .s�,•; ,it=. t;r�+l1! ldF+. �` k .ilrti#ciw.lYOi. ici.J�`�/ii•ieuM�.. .. .... _.,�yahSJb1$i: y�i�jl�r1+Y��:�:rii•�' yN�i�ti��a1'�titi.'�1�+;�.;�•;'�_4tS`+l�;�tNl�l'.:3.'�:n,'+',•'F.'�Yt1r�9�4'�f�F�f.+{'tiYt�.i. r�'e�:., :.�i•..►}'1 ..�"�v�';+. - EXHIBIT 3 PM PEAK SITE DISTPIBUTION *(VPH) ill r - � N 31 a / 3 27 S /oz zz _j �� .. *Vehicles Ppr HoUr a jWWA a3r'.u._..* /� /KL' A YE l����� W,�7s.4r3`.�.-. i'!!MLi�.'r�/�_1�ry�,t�^.' .1'�7rttt �`. S'.� ..... ... . . .. wa •.... _ •r_ sfW1...iN . ... . +:\' rs i 7• a / A From. the turn inq movement summaries taken at the intersections felt to be affected by the site, it was determined that the P.M. peak period volume (5:00 - 6:00 P.M.) was higher than other times of the day. The analysis was thus performed for this critical P.M. peak period. The existing and projected traffic volumes at the four major intersectons durnq the A.M. and P.M. peak periods are displayed in Figures 2 - 5. 9 VII. INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS Using the results of current traffic counts and trip generation and distribution for this project, it was determined that all intersections studied will operate at an acceptable level ui services. Results of this analysis is shown in Exhibit 4 and the actual calculations are displayed in the Appendices. VIII. UMMARY AND COMC-'USIiiNS As the analysea show, all intersections in the study area will operate at acceptable levels of service during the aeekhav P.M. Peak n,-)ur neriod. A reviaw of ingress and egress traffic generated by this site will have only one (1) access point on Lincoln Ave. Due to the percentago of distribution supplied by Dade county ano t:,o MVAT5 atvdy, it is felt that the traffic coming and nainY f,Y�m r111% site will have little or no impact on naiahQorhood raslde,ntxal manor roadway%@, a+s S,W, 27 Ave, will .P- 1001 lop, 004, z +tab +:ifs>r t y.,.• i►;xc l��i. 1i �� . . n; .�rii�. �l : n M.4-1 oil m 1p �...�. • • � �.,�. :7�.�t_i, !F�`�j. �,STl�'t� ,:'1111r �.7r'. , r 'it�1i�Y��i�1.�Cr'hY1 .�. Z tti `. PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES S.W. 27 Ave. & Bayshore Dr. W r CC r( fJ , V Ir, �1. cry 1? i n aQ existing XX site Generation (Xx) Total ExX.1 1 0, o I FIGURE 3 PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES S.W. 27 Ave. & Tigertail Ave. Cry i � i}Lv r� ji 0 Existing XX Site Generation (XX) Tatar. [XX� 1Q oli I TIZe A 4"A 4. FtGURE 4 rm PEAK HOUR VOLUMES S.W. 27 Ave. & Lincoln Ave, Z) -7 rz-a-7 lop, AVE: - (j, N Existing XX Site Generation (XX) Total CXX] wl 2 10. 0 a.kti7Ai f.�4;9t.Ci:1E'. ux3.:;YLc!�J�'ll�.i�l�l.Xer�if:�u'�.is�P+W1��.�s�1'r,��:��`���,'��v'��d'v�S?!�w�i��Y,�. I'v�C+� '�' �tiT!'•1•;rliE3s tu' r FIGURE 5 PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES S,W. 2-7 Ave. & Bird Ave. 4 IN t=f m Vw 0/Kr, Avg l Lip I' �� , c'--- v4 .ii. �`•, �f f � .� �.� r/ A. M Existing XX Site Generation (XX) Total [XX] •.Kl�%'•`.�,�1;w?43'iiek.#!4;�1.'4p1k''.!��C�.4'�?.i•�:.�'ti+_y�►.�•.'1.i��.VRikri�E�".-�'li►�aCli61i�*,l�:ts�t�YM1�dC).Ym►?ri:'ILL°�w�'4yY�iI�d�Rr�!cii{:�ki�i�.+�:i� .ft .. '+� +�A1>•fl a'w,1�4 +�.'71�54' }�i�.+�,.:iq1'�1i�N%i;�tii'1"�N{dia'ti`.�'}]1!1,��';'�tE.�l+ .:ii' !.? � , �. ;iM iyiiY�e! Y '.� +:.``!YC.� '�'i:" i+. +l �'� ' xl��}�Nm r4ti�' y5j:s EXHIBIT 4 CAPACITY ANALYSIS EX13tinq Level Proposea Level Service of Service Interr,ection of SW 27 AV & Bird AV "C.. SW 27 AV i'igertail AV "C" SW 217 Av & Bayshore Dr. "A" "All s - tivaifil►,rapr.;t9E;►' r,..._ .,.ram.`. %��''t OWN. h. s. . .. h ;. �Ci� .... lM+�ru-.�� •w w t .. :5ie�f:�M.ik% serve as the primary feeder route to destination points: This will become even more evident as S.W. 27 Ave. is widened to the plannea four lane facility. The overall traffic generated will have very little impact to all areas in proximity to this site. The traffic now usina L..inccln Ave. has such a low volume that the increasLe generated by this siste will not cause any problem.. The developer, however, may consider the possibilities of having a traffic signaiization :it.udy performed at the intersection of S.W. 27 Ave. and Lincoln Ave. after completion and lull occupancy of the building's attained, to determine if signalization may be beneficial. 0 91 3 7 3 , 0 APPENDICES ) .. _ � .r�;, ;m�}' : i..+I�J6'�J'J•+'J:�.'�=�'r.�*�,i.�F.a�r�.�, rws,+r�i��'rct.� k����1#'' ,. -. ..3�!!� {g ,_ 4 � J �} ,C �i R �, �L�•`. ws. �..�ii+�i•1r,f4� �•.••,i� N�.t�` ♦ � /1/fl I LES M OSS & A SSOC IATES, I N C._ Cbntuitimo Engtnoo 3 Oi�lSEpVE�t3: , im $-W 84 Stteet TURNING MOVEMENT SUMMARY , Miami. FL 33183 -'-- (305) 386.1212 AY / 1�._/.<''� DATE ``. ,.; WEATHER _ N•5 E TIME tiOATfIBOUND 50UTHBOUNO TOTAL. 7 EA5T50UN0 �Sts OtiNMi! Yp• TERVAL �..� otu TOTAL te�►� TOTAL / r i r 75 �' I / r•..J '�' 1 yVI / 4 .i `I 'OTAL I / "/ /-G r t G .IGI /Y9 1 I �� O�i j 'S '!• ( 13 11 3 / 7 3 14 //'G -7 �0 2' < ? z 9 4 R 3 -z /D 5 �: _) ! I /2/ 4 J3� 3 •0 � �� a 7 zL z3 0' S3 1 3 O � 5 37 _ 17 /G 3 60 I81rl � "- 1 /9 50 2 3 6 -;.a 4 Z 3C, � 3 a rOTAL I `� Ei`l l 2��?:JI /G /SLR 41 l yi-I I oo SZ - • - I 1 �- .' ,y 2� I"l3 !3 !q0 1211 /� • - I ; 1 96 e. 03 24Z 1�.3 8 y l /G /�J ! `) �' J 3 O J711, 2Z7 4< (� l ?4 12 4. r-OTu 0/ IC b e9,47111 l X/ 11 ,/9 9,f �:.Z Z I 4 G 7 01 y ,_ f Z 1 p I r• J2-, ��S 40 39 I 41 Zo Ze SqZ 3 ?ZI 1 . 1 ! • , ¢ 4-1nl l 3- 2 26 �• /,14 .. 1'7 0,46 6 /0 l ( � . V �% � v. 37 .. / .. (OTA�, II �. JI! 2'l -~��� :,�o l J� /LJ"! rr,n /2� 1 ISM' r��) 7.Fo 61 ( i r, � OTA4 i r 0112 '}�,'►'hipiYlY�'�`�'��rre��),1F..iixi�.�aa'Y��L�t�!�x��Gii r:�G.:tiiiliM;.ai`is.���+�►}YWi?�l�iai'Y�.•itd.S�k,'�'„ �i�l"—i•4L�iG�! t' ;t,�•i�ss.a y°lyplf.}'#�'�.�}iYi1'IMYi!�1�7!:�r``�V�.::`'rlr'�=Q)"t�,e(. (��••�•.'t'11iii.�'i-'r:� �i10+P:?•'iiNtre'�Ii'�.K�►.'�+%4�si�Ti.i:::'�G•�.{�+r1�t�1Hy6cL.r��;0.:.�>i/�'Pf��:C'L�t1�.�.'wY`fr.m�^i'�:�: i+ ' I D �0SS & ASSOCi�TES, IN MILES. consultiN Enaineors OBSEAVEIIS = iM S W. 84 StreOt TURN I NC MOVEMENT SL& AAAY j Miami. fl 33183 _- I (305) 386.1212 3-1 ;AWAY I ON OATS WEATHER A_ l 1 TIME7MORTHOMNO SOUTHBOUND .N$ TOTAL EASTBOUNDTERVA il r* OTALTOTAL ?DIAL eTAL 1-2 77 TOTAL .�.. r"/•l ! ''�'� S'Z /t� ?" '�;^ " /�� ..;� �rl ;'� •�'L �% :;711 17 I l7c:� "'� �`'l /Z s?G 3 Z6 9' 33 � 4' ;GC �3 � lJ I 28 — 7/�=► 1 JAG - =, :� / �� /s �7 14 7� TOTAL S44 S) 13711 'f H 7 16 /z4-1 07 .. J TOTAL -: y - •.'_^ 71 a^ S7y vl n44 I '/ .� 1 � •, `Z.l ',� c `I 1 r � � �'' ' ' I � 6 Z :; S � '''�% •'1 /Z I /� � sof S' S1: . Lc- I G'LL j OTA L I) / `I 141 «1 s` 1 /9z cams== /l '1 6 33 .r '[ �� 'IU s /D y 4f� !,, I 6 24 y MAL _ 1 _ f Pill • IN r 100 • _:��+���i�%'�� . �r.��t��lk?+"!!'.�+Yr1.. t� �;?����1F1ti°''E'M . .. cv; t:►��,;�; Y h c Ar.i��ii �a;�s .y 1 1 i f Y ' .iii • Jr _ MILESMOSS&,SOMA` ES.- INC. consuitira Efloww n biSEf vER�! 1200 S.W. 84 5t*of TUiiN I NO MOVEMENT SU"AA" Micrni. FL 33183 J (305) 38& 12 12 •7 � ` 14-1 CATI ON .r....r �._ Y / �c'/ DATE `" `'l�''' WEATHER _ TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND N-S TOTAL EASTBOUND WESTBOUND E•w TOTA ITERVAL et�� r*etr► 117 4-'7 S TOTAL )`` lG'f j ►YS �—� _`I 1 J i 3% r //s 7 f 47, TOTAL _ •t�L L —,,o+ll-1I6 72U 117 4. rOTAL S4"l 4 . 5 :� G SS`i G1) J / / y `, l 36 6� �•�• l95 -; �Y� /1� z�� / 7 � - 8 41 J .51 oll TOTAL $ 7C: 'QTA6 i i .1 ..ORION ,_ .. _ _. FRS 1 ."M • . _ _ 14TA4 _ a .w-t %.4+.V tT�/ 1Yt •!�W.�•'�. -.. . r• /��w�•M.W v !�; ••1i. MILESMOSS &ASSO'CIATESo INC,-.-- �Oi`13ultitl� Etigii5H19is ObSERVEII'S 120M S W. 84 Street TURNING MOAMENT SUI*AARY MICJM. FL 33183 (305) 386.121 , A Y 0ATE r -' WEATHER Tth1ET NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND TOTAL EASTBOUND WESTS"O TOt TERV1 r,** TOTAL ro TOTAL TOTAL) w.L v /o I 11 G �' ¢� ?" /7 135' e10 l III 141. 'OTAL I lI .,7 !/�, -.4 I i �; . f �� `/`}/ :` 7p► } :" '[� l '�7 s 14 A z, m' ` 9 3vI Ij i lG is G �`l —� L 7✓ 6) ( 114- G(. �c Z4 zo •/G G i� /� Sc► I1 47 7 ► �3 l :� 46 Z G / 7 41 I Sel J � =� �� '��I J� Lr, � •l� �� J(� .•3/ �G �� Jc31 zS 5�' r �:,Q�...� 'OTAL I c-n -,e / s v In �� -s �� J l s �� f /S�l 4 a� i4 l sI 7 /✓ _Y -1 r✓ S CY J 'J -sJ �O �r` I' rJ0 log � 11 •J�� `�� 14'Y/ �L! �j (o �/ �� ��,., liq 7 'OTAL � �, � t -f / 4 � I � C , � _' .�S qs 11 / G71I 1 R 74 31 0 - 1 4 ,3- c, = SZ /43 4-) ?7 L3II r S1 ,, OTAL 477 / /s' ,.�y 1;1;,� ' r:,�l f� ,fig 17iL Ie, YJZ 2gl FP ' I sw'. i r �. VAL mmomm—m. I -Rom ... ow"Now memo M� saw= .�• , Lwowxmm fIRt WORM 11 1Im a r 1001 — ':'rAt�+S+'+Y iiv#�MYtY�^r+7+•�,.w�.lY: ��,t: Y,a'F:.�l�N��i�+J�•''Jt� t�1Y��L�' 1��.� r. n ... �i^`.^. ��lti���:: r(a:.�4#tMZ':e%��,.a �x �•SL�r ��:�.Nr•:!wY�A'�i�!"a'�i,.'�,.1�. .> �. .. :�'-+,y�'' SITE NO,, MIME FILE: TTAIt21E - I HOUR, I CHANNEL VEHICLE COUNT TIGERTAIL ! tV 21 AVE NORTNEASTMI) COUNT RATIO: 1.00 MEEK OF MONDAY APRIL 15, 1985 i..a.Wnrrbiriirr ra�r rrr�rrrr Mrrrrr rrrrrr r�iiYiiiLiiiiirii�iirrrr—rrr�rrrrr—rrrrrrrrrrr�►a�ryJ"rNrriViiM1Urirr�ir rliii�r�irr�.ry�y`y.rir _ HOUR NWAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSOAY FRIDAY WEEKDAY SATURDAY SUN04Y T DAY BEGINS 15 16 ll .18 19 AVERAGE ZO 21 AVERAGE". �l.Mr Yiwrr.. AN �r�r�r�r�r�i ��i—�r�rrrr—rwrrrrii�ii�i�►Mirii��iirrrrrrrrrr.r�ir►M rM�Mr��i-r� NM��rYM 12 • ' 104 1 • 82 + + 82 + 82 2 • ' 51 ' ' 51 • • 51 3 39 ' ' 39 39 4 17 + 17 ' 17 _ 5 c8 28 , • Z8 6 143 ' 143 ' 143' 7 ' 456 ' ' 456 ' ' 4S6 8 9 ' ' • 673 373 ' ' ' ° 673 373 + ' ' ' 673 373 10 ' 293 ' ' 293 ` ' 293 Il ' ' 248 ' ' 248 ' ' 248 PM 12 ' 249 ' ' 249 ' ° 249 1 326 ' ' 326 ' ' 326 2 303 ' 303 ' 303 3 365 365 ' 365 4 336 ' ' 336 ' 336 - 5 6 374 212 ' ' ' 374 212 ' ' ' ' 374 Z12 - 7 ' 194 + ' ' 194 ' • 194 8 159 ' 159 ' • 159 9 • 179 • 179 . • 179 10 188 ' 188 ' • 188 11 169 ° 169 ' ' 169 ---------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------- --------- ------------------------------ TOTALS 0 1811 3750 0 0 5561 0 0 5561 S AVG WKOAY 0,00 0,33 0.67 0,OQ 0.00 I AVG DAY 0.00 0.33 0.67 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 AN PEAK MR ' 8 PEAK FLOW + ' 673 + • + + 'HR PM PEAK + 5 3 + t t t PEAK FIQM 374 365 + + t t ,x i 1001 i§0Vw440wr te A WSWAAA W-- 4t, *AN FA-4Ak40#A OAL a% *w1x qwjwA*A WE NO.: 1411.21E rILE., I'TAIL271 I HOUR, 2 CHANNEL VEHICLE COUNT tld.40r*i, esW ItP A6*.# COUNt RATIO: 1,00 MEEK OF MONDAY APRIL IS, 198E ------------- ............. ----------- 40UP MONDAY Is ttjEsop 16 WEDNESDAY 17 THURSDAY 18 FRIDAY 11 SATURDAY 20 SUNDAY 21 VEEKDAY AvtqA.q,. 1EGINS Ne sw H-0 sw Hit SW me S d He sw NE S PX w HAr SA ---------- ----------- ----------------------- ---------- ........... 120 104 92 104 12 1 82 52 82 S2 2 Sl 33 51 33 1 39 24 R R R 19 21 4 17 8 17 8 28 18 28 1! 6 143 123 143 12, 7 456 284 • 456 214 8 673 293 673 2?- 9 373 209 373 to 293 267 293 Z-' It 248 296 2 12PM 249 355 249 3 1 326 334 326 334 2 303 377 303 3?- 1 365 418 165 4 336 429 336 42--. 5 374 602 374 6101 6 212 372 212 37: 7 194 273 194 2-1- - 8 159 204 159 2cli 9 179 201 179 2 1. . 10 188 196 188 169 143 169 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- )TALS 0 0 1811 2420 3750 3183 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5561 -------- 56.: COM81NED TOTALS - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 196 196 134 134 2 84 3 63 63 4 25 25 5 46 46. 6•766 Z66 7 740 740 8 966 .966 9 • 582 582 10 560 560 544 f # R544 604 R R R R 604 660 680 6 80 101 75) 765 765 5 1 976 976 6 S54 584 467 467 363 9, Igo 350 381 384 •a rregravow vowwwr rovwv vvvw v Too ova or rwww vwvwv ww wwwww v r wwwwwww a wwwv wwwwwww vvwww wwwwwr To 90 wwww www If t 'low q��t:�'Y�Am•tp'�`+,'�1t3:`��,v�'�,9i� ..��,•. !�"'�':"•�.;ku;lt;�ai'!�?1.�:��'`2��"�1'"�_ S`%•'C1-.�`i:�'��Yt�Y�I�,'�y,!+!VYj:�iG.1C•j�,�,,..�r�9#,9�f4G3•sx ..iY . •++�tl.Zl.�+'.k, IW�'1Mii�is+�R S .i '�: ti a�w<.. s'11, +P •. c.. ,r.- � ..�`t'.�=1!�!`�I�I�I'... .. ..:. �'ic��?'..!'�tj'i�Y„�',''7�"+lk�.,�k� .r• ''L9t?Y^%'fi•1 ,'$A�jyU,�'IYJ",� •'•?':•.: 1'��'+Tr� 001 A SITE NO,: TTAIL21Y FILE: fi' ILV'i I HOUR, I CHANNEL VEHICLE COUNT TIGERTAIL ! SW 21 AVE SOUTHWESTOOUND COUNT RAfi10: 1,00 WEEK OF MONOAY APRII 15, 1985 ----------------------i--ii----------------►---------------i... i1�Y+w...♦ HOUR MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY WEEKDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY 7 01Y - BEGINS IS 16 11 18 19 AVERAGE 20 21 AVERAt ----i-L---i-rir-ri-ri-------------- -------i---ri-a.-r--------------Y---r--------------------------- ----iiW-rl-iY61`.ii.Oii-iiYli�ii AM 12 ' ' 92 ' ' 92 • ' 92 52 ` 52 2 + ' 33 • ' 33 33 3 24 24 24 5 ' 18 • 18 ' ' 18 6 ' 123 • 123 • ' 122 7 ' 284 ' ' 284 + 284 8 ' ' 293 ' 293 ' ' 293 9 ' ' 209 ' 209 ' ' 209 10 ' 267 ' 267 ' 267 II • • 296 296 ' ' 296 PM 1 12 355 355 ' ' 355 1 ' 334 334 ' ' 334 2 • ' 377 ' 377 ' ' 377 3 418 418 ' ' 418 4 429 • 429 ' ' 429 5 602 ' 602 ' ' 602 ' 6 ' 372 ' 372 ' 372 7 ' 273 ' 273 ' 273 8 204 204 ' 20A 9 ' 201 ' 201 ' ' 201 10 196 ' ' 196 ' • 196: II ' 143 ' ' • 143 ' ' 143 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- •--------- ----- ---------- TOTALS 0 2420 3183 0 0 $603 0 0 _ 5601,. I S AVG WKOAY 0.00 0.43 0.57 0.00 0.00 t AVG DAY 0.00 0.43 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 J _ AA PEAK HR II PEAK FLOW ' 296 - PM PEAK HR PEAK FLOW ' 602 - i �Mli1�fW!iilrr��t+IwrlwNis3MK"i f+Iu L`.9i�wret,r.!��l!!iw�►`iieiiWll"o➢w:�p:!lft;.v�q �. I HOUR, 2 CHANNEL VEHICLE COUNT WE NO.: FILE: 9AY27 SAYSHORE OR 3 SM 21 AVE COUN1 RATIO: 1,00 WEEK OE MONOAY AP111L 81 M53 ra.:ar..r.War----.---raa.•r.r•.•....-+«-.--ar-r...a.........-r-..-rr......... ....rrarrrsaraaaar. as HOUR MONDAY 8 TUESDAY 9 WEDNESDAY 10 tHURSOAY 11 FRIDAY 12 SATURDAY 13 SUNDAY 14 WEEKDAY AVERAGE EONS E W E W E W E 0 E W E W E W is It -•.»«rra-----------.r«r----------a-----r----r--r---'--r- ------------------ ---------r.rr.......... . .....,.-r...... Ilan t t t t t t 241 �26 t t t t t t 291 324 1 t t t t t t 151 t60 t t t t t t ISt 160 A. t t t t t t 135 ll5 t t t t t 1 135 115 3 t t t 1 t t 67 64 1 t t t t t 67 64 4 t t t t t 1 22 26 t t t t t t 22 26 5 t t t t i t 33 ;,2 t t t i t t 33 02 6 i t t 1 t t 154 80 t t t t t t 154 80 7 t 1 t t 1 t 639 207 t t t t 1 t 639 207 8 i i t t t t 1064 374 t t 1 t t t 1064 371 9 t 1 t i 1 t 957 440 t t t t t t 857 440 10 t t t t t t 605 572 t t t 1 t t 605 572 11 t t t i t t 627 647 t 1 1 1 I t 627 647 1:PM t i t t t t 749 500 1 1 t t i t 749 800 l t t i t i t all 88l t t 1 t t t 811 eel 2 t t t t t t 736 860 t t t t t t 736 260 3 i t t t 1 t 660 816 t t t t t t 660 816 4 1 t 1 t t t 626 1095 1 t t t t 1 626 1045 5 t t t t t t 614 1311 t t t t t t 614 1311 6 i t t t t t o84 1049 t t 1 t 1 t 684 1049 7 c c c t i t 585 314 1 t t t t t 585 814 a t t t t t t 536 623 t t t t t 1 536 623 9 t t t t 1 t 542 603 t t t t t t 542 603 1 t 1 1 1 551 530 t t t t t 1 551 c 30 11 1 t t t t t 476 494 t t t ----Q------- 1 1 1 476 A 9 4 TOTALS ----------------------- -----o - -- - ----------6 ------ -- 9 ------------a -----0 -------u 0 0 1:115M 13019 COW NED TOTALS -------------j -- ------- -- --------------611 ~--- --- -------- 12 -----i--------------`--------------t ---------- - -- ----------` 017 f 1 t t t 3!1 I 1 t 311 2 t t t 250 c t t 250 - 3 t 1 1 131 t t t 131 4 t t 1 48 1 t 1 40 5 t t t 65 1 1 1 65 6 1 t t 234 1 t t 234 7 1 t t 946 1 t t 046 8 t t 1 1430 { t t 1430 9 t 1 1 1w97 t 1 t 11291 10 t t t 1177 4 1 1 1177 It t t t 1274 t 1 t 1274, 12 t 1 1 1549 t t t 1549 1 t t t 1692 1 t t 1692 2 t t t 1596 i t t 1596 3 t t t 1476 1 t 1 1476, 4 t t. t 17g1 1 1 1 1721. 5 t t t 1�25 t t 1 19.25 6 4 t t 11�3 1 t t 1733 — 1 t t t 1399 t t t 1399 1 , 1159 t t �1s9 1 t 1145 10 4 t ! 11@1 ! t t< 1a01 1:1 11 i 1< 970 t 1 1 _ 97D R!!#!!S!lER!!!!•R!!t!!!!R!!R•!lf wwww wwwowRReef!!R4!•iwwwww!!!a!!!!t!!!!li,"www*f!w!.v TVfloiA www f#!!!Ql11•!!l RRR!!!!!flf�l Q A) � 't�?!►t*t��a`�i.4 �fiA�y.Af;W,,�y�,�p,6�'• Na► Piit�.•.�af��Y�.>�ikS'+1�1f,�U.1�1'�l�t .. .. _ _ . iEt�MEr a c rw�� 'ur!i'_ �a v'�iktr'T!•�Hi.�'wK! •r.. • ... .. .��.:�: ITE 40: FILE: 218 I HOU4A 2 CHANNEL VEr.I-'LE COUNT ;W 21 AVE i EA`ORE DA COuNT RATIO: 1.0 WEEK DF MOMDAY APA1L 8, 1485 ..............................................r.-....................--r.a.-ar-r.r-a. 40UA MONDAY 8 TUESDAY 4 WEDNESDAY 10 TNUkSDAY 11 FAIDAY 12 SATURDAY 13 SUNDAY 14 WEEKDAY AVERAGE HSINS N S N 5 N S N S N S N S N S N S ..--.-......r...-------- ------------------ --------------------- .-...-.-..-------.---r-.-------.--.-------r-----r;.a-------- lAM t t t t t t 162 111 1 t t t t t 162 117 1 t t t t t t 83 66 t t t t t t 83 66 c t t t t t t 60 56 t t t t t 1 60 56 t t t t t t t 32 36 t t t t t t 32 3b 4 t i t 1 t ! 16 15 i 1 1 t t t 16 t5 31 I1 t t 1 t t t 31 11 5 t t t t t t 40 23 t t t t 1 t 40 23 1 t t 1 t i t 110 15 t t t t t t It0 i5 3 t t t t t 1 196 211 1 t ! t t t 196 211 9 t t t i 1 t :45 262 t t t t t t 245 262 1;1 t i t 1 t 1 299 291 t t t t 1 t 299 297 !! t t t t t t 31.5 358 I t t t t t 325 3.3 !:FM t t t t t 1 196 415 t t t t 1 t 396 415 1 t t t t t t N3 Q5 t t t t t t 383 4;5 t t t t t ! 441 439 t t t i t t 441 439 3 t t t t t t 312 403 t t t t 9 1 312 403 4 t t t t t t 336 3Y6 1 t t t t t 336 395 5 c t t t 1 t 415 346 t t t t t t 415 346 [?4 05 t t t t t t 294 4}5 t t c t t t i0q ;31 t t t t t t 309 311 d t t t t t t ;32 718 t t t t t t .'82 318 t t t t i t 231 263 t t t t 1 t 239 261 lu t t t t t t 116 233 t t 1 t 1 t 316 233 11 t t t t t t 185 166 1 t t t t t l85 166 --i--i---------------------------------------------U---- AL 5-- ---------------------------Q ----0--------u------------ 5507 r ---- CEMB14ED TOTALS ---i'------------`--------------, -------------i ---------- ------ -------` —---------� -------------` -------------279- --- 219 1 t t t 149 t t t 149 116 1 t t 116 ' t 1 t t8 1 t r - - 68 4 t t 1 tl t i t St 5 t t t 42 t t t 42 b t t t 63 1 t t 63 7 1 t t 185 t t t 185 ' 8 t i c 401 t t t 407 1 1 507 1 t 1 501 1 t 596 t t t 596 11 t 1 1 603 1 t 1 603 l� 1 1 t yll t t 1 911 1 1 1 1 060 t 1 t d68 580 t 1 t aao 3 4 1 1 t 715 t t 1 715 5 ! 1 1 761 1 1 t 161 ! t t 649 1 1 1 699 1 t 1 1 640 4 1 1 640 8 ! 1 t b00 ! 1 t 600 4 1 t 502 549 t 4 t 549 RraftwwwwwwwwORgo, wwwww+E w wwww ww ww w MORE Two wwwwwwwwwwwwwwr ww TV ww wwwwwwwwwrww Mwwwwwwwwww www wwwwswwwwwwwwwwwwwo,ow ww or wwwiwwwww wwwwwwwwrww-..: �A°t�RQ1 tf�ir#.v2.4r.•iP=ti1JCj1�t:1:ia+rr�,ti�Maey�y�i�i+'rfF�l�tat+kl�►;y�3Wd,!1��`i +l%� �'Jj'�,li•�%6YJ�A�:''•yi t�.`i •.t{'1::; \!y 1�i ,i•:'?'6.' ��•!.!Ra :�+`••�i��1�7:�`7!iWii'A�� `L?.��•�.LR'+w .��Y,Y�..c���t�.'j r�. .•�tR��/+SS��!��}'�C`�,., ,�. eT!7��T"'�''r��Y.. �.�./iY�� - EXISTING PM PEAK S.W. 27 Ave. & Bird Ave. e;, -'L1yV EXPIM 4 k aE •>} +f tie !! it aF it fF tir tir A 4 A r • 1 iF 1l• lr iF IF iF i! +f 1F tiF iF iE •R i •M ti{ ..LVc,L Ur 74 .3 A•tR��R#'fi•�+•*•4w•*�•R•M•*•*4•*•R�r�!•�••t*#•1r*R##•4#4•Ril•#• t'j i wlL; ... .... ... .... ... .... Vfll (_,MC'r wESTBOUND MUV wIDTH RTL 11.0 it;l;u-%D S-{ bQU:�C, �V `C�T.:rill 'r,fD .. - -• .— i �. J 7 151 '•t i4; 41 "S 1 ,,K, PEAT. mOUR FArI -P•,E�`.::�a� ••a/ .,{•. ,:.-.. .ii1!ff, r'Itl"1'`_l«�L;U VI i• L.;,Ilk.: LtY Yl VE. 1' ��, •: ,,;..; �;. ,^;t; ; �,t,r�; Jan hPRTRf'1IJND WESTBOUND 4:y t;,1 ,*Ge, it l;i+ M1 I. •".,, % oLii (' t;M itil) (2M )TriQUN 0 W TE+Q�,a;1R { dr. 'J A• t :I 'Fie;' ! k'tnt 94 a PROPOSED PM PEAK S.W. 27 Ave & Bird Ave. isrt 1 ; : �.•r+,- tiit_i'Jh.l+1� Iv . ►a�.;N,� Y �� 1., It # •iF R # +r A- •IE• 7t• •+l• •M• •k # •M• !F •� # # # •fi •!► # � •+r * tir •Ih#'iFi!'�h iF * �• .IN 711 V I L , ".4 VOL 3-7'5 k 7i 4 >r k t r +r r •R 4 �t * ` ! >t IF a tii * M tf •* iF 3t # it i} >t * +F r 4 Pi.Vi: :J •. 1..� r:t+� �usvii -►+=�Ti���i,iVi.7 Wt•7 . L+QUI�I7 h1LJ•"r: ';i_'� +.,L`•' V"; jV wlil�ra :�tIIV WIDTH :i.V,l RTi- 11.0 �- •I- . . . • • • . . • • . . • • • • • . • • • • • J . • • a • • • • , . • • • • • • • • t, lLjjrylEG EHiS uSu;E0UND 7 _.. - •r it.. _iC. 036 151 . tUs., �.)i�h+L F+_ >r.::i (.✓ttK) 1' .AK :1UUi1 FACTOR I1 r •'1.1.E:: t •� t' t' sh 77 :tip F:u:M.7t tZ) ..... . i I +'-- ^i ii`�r: �."�1...sj`L`.S L •r .+:'.,3�iC �IG'�1 I 1 t.jtr , �'r: ..j.�i.:J '^i •, i . ICI ii..iMu E.H aTl'i��l:IiWa wL-ST;.A;•JtVD 44 ,a''iIIii ti+l'i+ALJP>;l;t 79 Ila •�x�`i�"ir"�' �'S'!�'T-^ S� :�. nwu•,,.i+r�wl�+�'�1��r�'.,�'ltii'fr,,�fp'7.'+' EXISTING PM PEAK - - S.W. 27 Ave. & Tigertail Ave. - - k k-!' 11•-i<• sr K'k 11.1rf. tir�1•tibtiFit•1f•Rit*7F�iF+Ptirlrlr�F�M'Rtir+rtif•;t• iCAN- E V0L 7Z" — ..,t1i.�i i:..�_ �dY•. 1 ivy, k 4 iF fi fi til• •+# iF # # •fe• •! of tir �(• x # •Il-'iF tiF tiF tif- it• tit• �!• tir tiF r r• � �• �{ tir * � tit• ..:.• ; - t+u, ,'... �� a; nblj-j1\ 1. r �;bT :4i w%1) W�SYDDi✓hD _ _:�I�::. �:..'� n .:1 . 1 �'.;'J ♦► :J'`'1 r�lJ�' iv:.J : n MUV WIDTH R. •/_ : li, ..'.:.! :7LJri I) 1,_7 74 24 (*ii nit 1 r'GHtS �1Jt.rt rrii: i iJi� .64 �hi:�. l'71__f•.J � _ . as �r,►.i�_ .:,; � ;1:.. r�,.� �,.,Fi:`; .'hip. :� •t.i IV .71 iin ` _ .. �. i , , 't t .. j-i _ » 1' a• J�LJ 1-.Lit'!.+i�tJ `ois .' I'F- lai:a+:iWG �A',a'� G+:Jvlbil `a' QwltiO WE TEc •sid l + C-O' Ji,A.., �r!•+�- i i'I.1. (i ,rr�i�J y', f1Tb�IS,Ji�I►� iAi� f � 1�1e� 1 1� *d A 1r ai x Mrl ist / 7 4 44 ry 7�1 *. i�. 11 •i WM ,�F!!'� N/mil r •'t�!�el+c�71:}fw!'�!'�1' 11�tiH.fJ� lt�ll, i'r�,+afl�ltiS�itr;.e►.Ym►!t+Y�lli�'.•+tid.:xrbt:?..��1��..i!'�`. •+c�`�'�;?iki%t:��.�•14VAad11C•K.,�r:' `u �?` ri+t•�' !�� ! w,.t,w.+.+•{�y�F."iF•�4t�i�t. ,f�.pp..RhF.+.t•{A, -n tkt•r.�-y ,{.y, , }.:. ,,e. �r• �' y a+..'•:�r�ti �y y4Mf�i,°,i✓;•. .., rn19+� A'� t't/'•i�a'Pi ,.— :�77!•'fl, i'�'L dl'r !!..' Y 11? • -.. ��V'1��:1 •• (� ^ 'M•T•. .�21!� I PROPOSED PM PEAK S.W. 27 Ave. & Tigertail Ave. —. iF•M•iF#�l�F�t•k•!ftlf•##*1l•iF###*iE#•ff•M•#'R4#iF�!•##1lil• 1. :' Ji�l•�•V llr .� .r tips rtJRG•iy LUi, 71 434 x•it* R•##+F*•R#•R•t•�*#i•if•4-F•kf1F 1Y•#�•X*1!*i•�••1F •Jt �'•M't Al Ll �!•1•Vt;. '•'..!'v' n.,.! I �i •rl�Y I.tL• � r ���/V hi+: r1 _ �.�:. :_.t• t� li.lJ K"t. li.t� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v wc3"s'k+GUIvD MUV wIDTH R.. 11. 1+ ._. �,,.,,_ t.,l� _YtJ.. t r_.:L.tiL -:rl�•i it.a.�ttiii 'vd=',� rbUUNO 71+ l:b 74 44d c<UL'A ride: i tJ.R •'y�i!•; .^ f' 1�1�4: �4«{ �� �t-• ''i�l�liJn,�'s � ��7 � �� �� liti� ! VV • 1 .'�'�i �'�i+�' ' '••iEyk�l`t2,���1 kY pi9r. :�+ o'r✓.�'rY•W;�i��liiWl.� �` , iry rY• : o . .. v ei-�,idd�it:F•1ta..I.Wt1.1 'filt�i�•5�..... . �AWii�1S►1if►,S`<L�•t'.w+`�. 1i7�'t''F�.. ��ih�14./�:�1•l°!��";:5�'•+�.ti•lt'�+:'.''f'4L•iM!:�;1,i!'C•��'��'r'!F�u.�:'.'�.'1 t,, .: Kl:•.., v.`.y�ui'}.i ' �.,k ..,. i EXISTING PM PEAK S.W. 27 Ave. & Bayshore Or, LIQ I l` Ii;Hw i'rtl•3VE`"tN �" HNIa�Y S: D4 VE 417ki5 iF 1E• �k •!<• �• 4 ie• � N• i!• �t # il• it• iF ai• �F il• )f it if• * * * •Il• it •tf• � iF it• it• �!• it •t!• SA URP 1 ION 43 i ; tC,'-+L- N/S VLA- ego R! " ILAL. to/W VUL 2 1 AL SUS" 741 rf �• >f it• •;F �• ;t. � ->f �• +t• * •rt.y. *• �• � a• � •�• •te• � it• *• * •� � * * >F * it it• •�. �• �t- — �i=,_i.;�.� :;:.s:."t�kt►t':^,:: t W-j r—yuu%u WESTBOUND ri."J: ! •. i': :� 1 Ll O a Y i`i'J w I a r: i MLIV WIDTH 11.0 T. 11.E �► ... .... ... .... 1 1 . tC :... 11.0 J . • . • • . . • • . . • • . • • • • • • . • • • • • • 714PPi i is VGL-UMkS vu � i•:-�r;;t �tiL �-i, t�; r H:;0 IN 1) � yS 1 Ni )s.;tin was rL;ouNn �t--! 40 143 61 17 .. i:r. 6 Tn 133 134 _UL,'kL- bUtihb CV/elk) I'EAK ty0uR t=AC°rOR ;`.Uil' nLiUu:%.0 ; .71 LNL: 1 .84 Nc5 1 s t.:.11tii•1 � 1 . 8� I r't'i1'+:r "u�j 1i/:1 � is . i••i• 1-'.i i is TIJI't�V i-'F�IJ . kl�'�D ' jai .r : L . Nr— I ~ic;t 'l Li 1'M4J I r-L T:.:! t ilt; i t a Htti i-%L" i V Y 0 — 93 . (i;F'LDtl / F*:1''t ) t. Jt "raj�l3 i`.1 ;-'oU .1 •'►�Nl3WNiJ t=AW BOWND WgSTWUNO 1 ' ,[ om La0440, 4 lol�tk+s. i PROPOSED PM PEAK S.W. 27 Ave. & Bayshore Dr. & ANALY'zi,,n SA""UHATION 44 i'CA�- N/b V 0 L. 2 3,, c*p c rlt-(.L FIW VUL 521 "Ut m 7!54 71) r-r4STYROUND WESTBOUND U'V W1 !Y%LjV W; Mi"V WTnTH MOV WIDTH . RT• R 1 . 14. i . 0 R. . ,&.0 R. 11.0 T . . 11.0 r . . 11.13 T.. 11.0 VOLUMES a±u I "-IbUUNU &A,-ii8uuNu WES-16BOUND "Er: 1" OIL; �13 153 66 641, 39 7 17 828 G ri -UL,H&- bUtiES (.n -i R) Pl-;AK HOUR FAMCOrd .71 5,-j Li L-4 .84 P"As, Ni:; PRU'l ciu-, ,iD 4 Ix3 (;vPtEDtS/tlR) 41 b L) ti' bY' MCJV'-;-"Mr-NT lkw (-lATHF4('lLjrVD EOSTFIOUND a4;0 WESTBOUND t; F 1' Irswi4 1'-F4QwN0 FQSRTBLINO WWWWN0 VU6.j-fc� 4 17 0 Arol- $ Jv� Y-t; ,d1 1y 14K N04 CK yN4.. • ofs,'t x iia 'V�t%{ e�R'!`�4C!�TY:•if�dtti�Ec.��iEizGtYiiwlts ,W�!lotfd� � � 'YlfrbY'�'+�'4�SiF°'�'ti°` _ . • �: t. 1 M1i�4�'+�iw.� . ' Y $` uffltJ (\I11Vt4j" �' , e•- d V 1 S 1 �.....i Do t 12 IS I60 i�► 22 13 .r.� 22 rp my 2 21 16 4 (2 224 1 20 20 2 1r a 1e 1>i, ' 10 ti0 16 ' S' AVE 24 13 Z 12 1s 13 �L woo g 23 14 V 11 Q 14 0 it 9 22 15 p T Q' 3 11 a 6 21 6 9 W 13 �� 3 4 26 9 1A 4 •�O J� •� 1 19 2 IT a Q 2 1 T 30 001 19ISo ISO 18 T ti 6 t )JET GEMINI M z APART M-7429 3 �'Ru� t 14N K, .r-5 I Til �� cV 6 27 • 13 6 1 10 12 8 T 10 O�� s T .::. 2 2 1 � 8 22 21 ® T .. .. S )3 6 24 10 5 26 IT 12 3 . 2 .s0 150 15 14Iso s 1 :::::•: \ 40 3 TRACTW 29 ISO 30 �s OAK 1 4VILLA 30 55 54 51 50 49 4- - do ' (/'� 31 23 32 T3 ��� ` • 24 I 33 5 : A ' 34 , 28 -,. b°. ir 4 Ono to Q p t yGROVElit MOUNTAIN logo A f 9TRACT "All . �A: .�i;��'riit +.. t'. rAt�i`.�;�`i:'bl�':'�,♦ ,cr+�:J►�1k��t�i'!• , ' }� _ - su:&' . �' � A��: �%}fit ► ..a , .. r=:.•. . t...� • • a �fi �Vf:'i4,: ,,�4 ; ?1`•c•� .... _ • i. •` {.� :,r► •.. `�,,1/iy�jp ( a.•. d. y --.�. 1 �', � •.»a,. 'ili • N 'Y1 - , r _ , i+M,l�lti5�q• jt. •a ` ., � 1 �`�'•F,T�+y f1• ia��i h F • =JF" .ti: �; r,+� ,•;• ^�.{ �`•, a•+�•r•" _ a �•y,.i�a �,•,• �!!t •� +7• 'fir 4atrN�T •` , ita•,J' . �.. a •y�iyj,j„ �. iaai?a;,� •s �.. • •, r,.7:.,�` �� w• 'fv �.T L• At I �i .. �-,,�k�.'��'^�. +y`��,qd.... � �� .•stiw►f. .►a •,� .;;trC`y�'2� . v" " Y: ,"'�. r •� •,Z r �» Y•ti�4�, N•• ,t•;��•�'+H"�-`' rs � ���y;,�(f� _3.wb , '�E:`it tr krt+ ry `?1t ti .1 xr. +3r. ~ 'l tM. �e� . s"Jrr���,��•• vl+. � • +�4 y�•,,..�� � a M1�m y ti r. �r��' • • Ja7 tt r . ♦r •�v �tw.. -.,• r� _ � � as • ?'4 r;. �•-.....a...... - rC„�,*ra'�!�� ""�i`�'�' �"+�e+. y �•.,--•a'! • 1tvVp Lit IC 3r�► ` , a. � u� � �r' •-.+ f _ � • •fit. ' � �.; gt _.•f� t• Z: -� �'T.. '+ v, 7S,r'.• •�+ r _�� 3�,, •� �e Ffj:.+r �;.' r -:�}Y; �y 1r. X-i ~?�����•'••r-1•Wr•w- '� '.'"'� �'-.sr-t,�v-a' .ham ( a Cl i ".�l�.,7�►S�t.�•,,_;!:J�'.•\:A•F..a••%�,._ �( _ , - „ . �r�v.�v�:i.Y...t'+a► "tea;. .,•�.�. l* •Y -,��' ! r r!'Sir� s ::s'1' �� h • •� t`y♦.at•�a,�! _ .. � ` -J"'r ` '' Lt � `�`k �` Y_��:��5. .Gii �" �.1✓ � t=���'"!'1 �' a i � ',�+;'�;'.• ay .n;1 i,i�;,��!!+l��.r• r•F <` ._ larr't'.� t .f .�. i ♦ ••► �w j.v. �. p.� �.r�� ,Y i' — '\.Av�..j..%r +awf•. `�►;i �ly�R h,:�r_Y'2��_�.},�r�!i.�'Y ,i/• �•`:•'• F� •��Grf� �i.�I {.7M.r• t ���•''.'� • r`. � it : "i�♦�e. Yrw ,�. r,-ar.. •'{].. � +3 ..a ..� = i�: t'!v l.. _ �ry�,Fl.4 �}r't*JI�rL:ae,�iJ��'•t. ,� - /Cti'�' �' !: r , lY�. ' • •i •h %.4:,♦���f at.`rij , s - ( :/ • `��r� • a"� L�s�. " �' < 'K 1''i!�'f'!�i�N�p•�p'•11'.r,1�., w.� '~� i�i �•Vr R �. f s rM,}l. _'y,• i •�., 'J �.�� � r�' •,��.. �• r•. �Ir 3 (" i' _ � a� a ��,�a '. `I��� _�.Je�,^��r�-�;�,iyj„r.,y.-•�:•�a'.Y•Ihr„�,:�M1y`�^'�;f"'•' ��Ca:. �=�' �« �'fL.�=�• t r•,�,�. Myp. •Ryy{• �Y�F� r L a� r.- •i I �, ej' .�! 1, . \ `f• ••.. .w 43:3p • •.:rater., = r •Y �e N •�1. •. 1 +'�"I •fir '4_t � �.�.� V r �•. •kid Y rM+ • i /1.1 r' q►.•i 't • * �+ �. fi � �`j. r/ �,��r •�� :!�'rt .. > : -N, .'�•s+ L�sf* r� i'j•' ! * , �F�! frr JAgo o AL t � .4 . .,:. «��{, a rat r �` 4. �=s�•: rr,: Jr✓ r�, �. ��.7�'�A*�,/l>yl�, �d!�'! :.7 /1� - tj� � - �_ � �'M�r �' "*._• 0 �r'ssl+li'U,,;� ,/Y r+kfJ'ftOf, i ! i �+► ! ,: r ,♦.. a! ' r: ! �. =,sue i .. i�n0 tI4� 41 , �,+N, � a = Sr 'r+•' a �:• � � �•7'r � �e�A' yyt �• •� �: Jai' ' • R .4 r i`� . • + } n OF Alt w � r ' . •, =^�; it � ` !° , . ZB March 18t 1985 J-25-27 item # 5 b 6 AF X-25-27 ;,A - ttlsj"+•.1: a�Ai r. , s a% • +{nr �'Yk, ^ A +� 1� [ j /{/� (•'.f /�q A {� b * ,•!K': �.r!• i'� x } , �• :3r?r T•r, ,_ r T�♦e � Auvrox.= 73,�i13-3109 iR .?, .Avprr, ">+p l �'1! j• Aae e�m:ra' .�4 •.'s,s •!y a' ; !� * '} +srnm* . •'+t :r! •. .. e ' .Ind- INN" . i •t #•�,.,�� � At♦=,.;:{�# :•► 'rR't•�* . !4.l:� 7ti��*a1Mr ,•tj',t.r�+,,n, , � ! S •>A�fs1 ? WA& KANN," �AieMORANOUM MAR 18 A 9 10 VJ 01% Sergio Rodriguez ::IATF. March Director Planning Department -;UdjLcr Item 6 Zoning and Agenda March 18, 1985 41 William E. Parkes, P. E. '.=FEPFPICIS: ✓✓A 0 Assistant Director Department of Public Works `0 C L US L.4 C S: The sanitary sewer system adjacent to Lots 1 through 6. Block F, AMENDED PLAT OF NEW BISCAYNE (B-16) has sufficient capacity for the proposed planned development. This capacity is based on file plans indicating 60,000 sq.ft. of commercial/office and 24 residential units proposed for the site located on S. W. 27 Avenue between Tigertai-1 and Lincoln Avenues. JTW: mad �J 0�1 twi'Y'I�F�TFi:�i�.Mk11�M•.%iW'y�yt�iJ�(c� iaiFif�rc �.,.itl+t �t!�yt'.=cy�ytil�CYrl7•�k,`�17E.. ... .a•..... .:..4.'.,�.�., , 4'... 'tir.-.3'Fi.?�•r'sir!.,'�t+:dic��.l.�'�"`�/1.��. �� , ..F •�' , .. , . , . '� a '? s _1 L ♦ y y =%►tx.�illahi � A r�A1416'a,.twk. APPLICATION FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT File Number PD-83 Planned development (PD) districts may hereafter be established only by amendment to the Official Zoning Atlas and related amendatory action where tracts suitable in Iocation and character for the uses and structures proposed are to be planned and developed as units, according to the requirements and procedures set forth herein and for the particular district involved: Such districts shall be designated by the prefix PD, with a suf f Ix appropriate to their purposes. PD districts shall be appropriately located with respect to intended functions, to the pattern and timing of development existing or proposed in the adopted comprehensive plan, and to public and private facilities, existing or clearly to be available by the time development reaches the stage where they will be needed. All requirements specified in. Article 35, Amendments, shall be met... (Section 502). _ i• KENNETH M MYERS , hereby apply to the City Commis- sion of the City of Miami for an amendment to the Zoning Atlas of the City of Miami to a Planned Development classification, more particularly described herein and, in support of that request, furnish the following information: Parcel �I: 3151 SW 27th Ave & 2660Linco. Parcel II: 3163 SW 27th Ave. Parcel III: 3167 SW 27th Ave Ave I. Address of property Parcel IV: 2699 Tigertail & �3,173 SW 1-tb A s Miami. X_ 2. Two copies of a survey of the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor as required by Section 510.2.2. (Attach to application) i X 3. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered.by application and disclosure of interest form (Forms 4-83 and 4-83a, attach to application). X 4. Certified list of owners of real estate within 375' radius from the outside boundaries of property covered by this application. (See Form 3-83 and attach to application.) X 5. At least two photographs that show the entire property (land and improvements). X 6. Atlas sheet(s) on which property appears _ Page 45 X 7. Present Zoning Designation RG- 2l6 X 8. Proposed Zoning Designation PD-MU X 9. Report, as required by 510.2.1 (attach to application). X 10. Prellminnry Development Concept Plan, as required by 510.2.3. (Attach to appl - cation), Form 34-83 page I of 3 r+L?[.:•i-i..,•±.r!l?VJwii a,+r..;.`,t!":*,I:w�}9i+'9'K�Jr33'��},�g4cr�'i+Yt'�'+t'�•!�3 - w j b. '�}i%�i•Y�i�i�i:�.'i"�"R`r.►'�.ai�d. .— ���Y�4::1�'�likir!'.�;L'1� �.�C;�':^,!_... .r4�'�Y3.�L �L ���t`ti�a t X 1 1. Special Surveys, Approvals or Reports, if required, see Section 510.2.4. (Please list) Not Aequired (attach to application) 12. Nature and Extent of Staging, if required, see Section 510.2.5. (Attach to appli- cation) None required ( see statement attached) 13. Material. Covering Facilities for Common Use, as required by 510.2.6. (Attach to application) see attached statement 14. Restrictive Covenants,if required, see Section 510.2.7 (Attach to application) see attached statement 15. Any other material to be submitted in support of applications (Please list and attach to application.) NONE 16. Filing Fee of $ 1,531.40 according to following schedule: To: PD-H, PD-HC, PD-MU 0.04 per sq.ft. of net lot area; minimum B00.00 Sigvure Name Kenneth M Myers Address 1428 B ri ckel l Ave Miami Florida 33134 Phone .32')-9 n a I. STATE OF FLORIDA) SS; Al 5 COUNTY OF DADE ) Kenneth M Myers being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is t e Agent for Owner of the real property described in answer to question # 1, above; that he has read the foregoing answers and that the some are true and complete; and (if acting as agent for owner) that he has authority to execute this petition on behalf of the owner, ,�`orrn �f�•�3 Pogo Z of 3 10,°:. .'lw.i �:+t�:st l+�ti M.,lin�-lili/" d.}tti' l.-s+4 l:+h6 � i + ... i..;�4iyr Y > itaa r' � •3:rt L �'. ■: , i • . "' �o i'w"'...!' ?.l : t. \'' . + 'l}f�SW'+byq�.,y�� L V, �;•.y ..�Kh! i!•�4i�. ...7�r+t'" talN'` y�p;y �yiK� 7tJr3��,M�.L'�"ii+:'i! .� - 'fi' .� �i.i.._ .� :r: aW Y ' ��'�lait ,c�.r'ta'ta`�.i+��'%��v�w.•ril r SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me this 4th day of February 198 5. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 'Votary Piblic. Slate of i'=:orida at t.ar9C my commission E :,,ires l.ta;r'3, 1087 RONDEO THRU AG_NrS NOTARY BROKERAGE page 3 of 3 (SEAL.) n Rt ! 1 J V 7 the undersigned certifies that he entire area within the boundaries by virtue of the Option Agreements has unified control of the of the proPdgad PO -MU district, attached. Should the map amendment creating the PIS -MU district be approved, he and all others holding beneficial interest.in the property agree to proceed with the proposed development according to the City's regulations existing at that time. Furthermore he agrees to conform in the process of development to the preliminary development concept plan attached. He shall also provide such bonds, dedications, easements, guarantees;, - agreements, deeds of trust, contracts, and/or covenants acceptable to the City Commission as may be reasonably necessary to protect the public interest in completion of such development according to approved plans, and for provision and continuing operation and maintenance of such areas, facilities, and functions as are not to be provided, operated, or maintained at general public expense, and to provide such dedications, contributions, or guarantees as are required for provision of needed public facilities and services., RE: ITEM 12 This development will be constructed in one co-ordinated time span with no substantial time delays. There will be no staging of the various elements:: RE: ITEM 13' As this development will remain under single ownership all required maintenance of the elements for common use, will be carried out by a full time, on site, building maintanance. crew, or by a professional building management group. AS TO ITEM 14 - RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS If required by the City, applicant is willing to file and record a Restrictive Covenant of Record-, as a condition to commencement of construction, that the property will be utilized in accordance with the approved and agreed upon PD-MU project, which is the subject of this application. Xenneth M. Myers, as opts-o ee Lawrence M. N! r%s, as asignee,, of options PLATj t A?F AVTT��;,,.,. MM OF DADS ) before rle, the undamigned authority, this day pendr lly appeared Xenneth M Myret's ► who being by me first duly eworn, upolt oath. deposes and says: 1. That he is the owner, of the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public heating as rewired by OftbLnance No, 9600 of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, effecting the real property located in the City of Miami as described and listed on the. pages attached to this affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him to act in their behalf for the charge or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, phone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property which he is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts -as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth n Sworn to and Subscribed before me this 4 c3 of Feb 19 8 5 . - _.,_ to Public, Sta�e of Fl 'da a , Iy :; mission Expires: F,QWNPublic. S1:001r"'IV zI �7e. My CAminisslot! G�pitas aY ¢pNOEP TMiIU AG-NT'* ,%,TAlly w SEAL) r , 10012 O'�fP�4'S LIST owner I s Name. Parcel: t fiai l i ng AddreS5 + x ;, 1d0 Telephone Number___8,24 Legal beScri pti on: See Attached Owner*'s Name Walter A Mobley (100% owner ) i Parce` I�Mailing Address 1300 mice #6 Miami Florida 33133 Telephone Number 442= 9 g0'7 Legal Description: see attached Owner's Name Parcel III Mailing Address lgn Ai-lanti_C Ave Garden City Patk NY 11040 Telephone Number Legal Description: see attached Parcel IV Owners name Coconut Grove Investments Corp ( 100% owner) % Homero De La Torre Delta Shoe Corp 501 Sw 37th Ave Miami 33135 442-9807 see attached legal _ Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375' of the subject site is listed'as follows: �•r Street Address Legal Description owner 3156-60-62 SW 27th Ave Mobley Miami Street Address 3161 Center St owner Miami Mobley 0 e Street Address r.ni-G S and 6 Cornelia M_day Sub. Pentland Homestead Legal Description Lot 10 Cornelia M day Sub. Pent -Land Legal Description t � , STREET ADDRESSES AND LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF PARCELS PARCEL I: David Welsh (100% owner) Lot 1, Block F, SAMUEL RHODES AMENDED MAP OF NEW BISCAYNE, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in plat Book Be at Page 16 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, together with all buildings (a.k.a. 3151 S.W. 27th Ave., Miami, FL 33133, and 2660 Lincoln Avenue) PARCEL II: Walter A. Mobley (100% owner) Lot 2, Block F, AMENDED PLAT OF NEW BISCAYNE, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book, at Page 16 of,the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; (a.k.a. 3163 S.W. 27th Ave., Miami, Ft 33133) PARCEL III:- Frances M. Stein (100% owner) Lot 3, Block F, AMENDED PLAT OF NEW BISCAYNE, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book Be at Page 16 of the Public Records of Dade -County, Florida; (a.k.a. 3167 S.W. 27th Ave., Miami, FL 33133) PARCEL IV: Coconut Grove Investments Corp. (100% owner) Lots 4, 5, and 6 of Block F of SAMULL RHODES AMENDED PLAT OF NEW BISCAYNE, according to the Plat thereof-, as recorded in Plat Book Be at Page 16 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida a/k/a Lots 4, 5, and 6 in Block F of AMENDED PLAT OF NEW BISCAYNE, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book B,• at Page 16 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; (a.k.a. Chevron Svc, Station, 2699 Tigertail, Miami, FL 33133, and 3173 S.W. 27th Ave.) P L F�8 19 P8 -.05 L Legal description aid street address of SUbjeft real pr6pert4l. See attached legA19 2. Owner(s) of gwj�t real PtOpetVr-and' percentage Of ownership. Not-ftt City of Miami Ordinatce �b, 5419 requires disclosure of all partiea having a financial interest, either direct or indirect# in the subject wttbr of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question t2 requires disclosure of all shareholders of corporationso beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties# together with their addresses and proportionate 'interest. see attached disclosure of ownership additional beneficiaries 3. Legal description and street address of* any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b)-.located within 375 feet of the subject real property. 3156-60-62 S.W. 27th Ave Miami Fl -Lots 5 and 6-Corneli-a M Day Sub. Pentland Homestead 3161 Center St Miami T,ot 1.0 Cornelia M Day SUB. Pentland HomesteadJ CaOIER OR,=ORIEY MRO'NER STATEE OF FLORIDA SS: CCLEM OF DADE Unn-th M Myers being duly sworn, deyoses and says that ne- is the (U%rer) (Attorney for Owner) of the real property 'described in answer to question #1,, above; that he,has read the foregoing answers and that the same are true and corr.plete; and (if acting as attorney for owner) that he has authority to7moje t-h7iA- Disclosure of Ownership form on behalf of the owner. (SEAL) SMR; TO M SU55=5ED before me this 4,th day of Feb Florida at Laz-ie 1% =xm; Q'r�( Utfl-0 rA Y ;v 1 00 __ ....srisw>tw�orwsna+ ;;t7"dt'15: , i { r as r i• STATE OP A= CC= OF DADS Xoftneth NI M'e s_:. ► being duly m) deposes and sad►. E, he tie duly appointed �� of al r the owhersof the real pr6perty described in answer to ques On that he has read the foregoing answers; that the sane are true and oom- plete; and that he hat the authority to execute this Disclosure of ie� p sh f of behalf of the ownetr. SEAL _ C ) (Name) 01 SIQFN M A= SU=P.IBED before me this 4th• ' day of Feb5.; 4 Notary Pudic, State of t Florida at Large • (. MY COA"MISSIM, MMIFES: K l' t • �f ti ' r"N Wam-, �r PARCEL I: l STREET ADDRESSES AND LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS_ OF PARCELS David Welsh (100% owner) Lot 1, Block F, SAMUEL RHODES AMENDED MAP OF NEW BISCAYNE, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B, at Page 16 of the Public'Records of Dade County, Florida, together with all buildings (a.k.a. 3151 S.W. 27th Ave., Miami, FL 33133, and 2660 Lincoln Avenue) f PARCEL II: Walter A. Mobley (100% owner) _ Lot 2, Block F, AMENDED PLAT OF NEW BISCAYNE, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in R Plat Book, at Page 16 of•�the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; (a.k.a. 3163 S.W. 27th Ave., Miami, Ft 33133) k PARCEL III: Frances M. Stein (100% owner) Lot 3, Block F, AMENDED PLAT OF NEW BISCAYNE, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book B, at Page 16 of the Public Records of Dade -County, Florida; (a.k.a. 3167 S.W. 27th Ave., Miami, FL 33133) PARCEL IV: Coconut Grove Investments Corp. (100% owner) Lots 4, 5, and 6 of Block F of SAMUEL RHODES AMENDED PLAT OF NEW BISCAYNE, according to the Plat thereof; as recorded in Plat Book B, at Page 16 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida a/k/a Lots 4, 5, and 6 in Block F of AMENDED PLAT OF NEW BISCAYNE, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book B,, at Page 16 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; (a.k.a. Chevron Svc. Station, 2699 Tigertai,l, Miami., FL 33133, and 3173 S.W, 27th Ave,) . �«pr[,��.•,y-y-��� ..,�•;�ay� xrFicx�it�13 wiw1� iw`oA[►e�"cs:J,,a'�[��+��r k s--�fhl�i�i�{ �lyy�: Y . y{.,�a,�.y�}2s,a !, t. '.. ..r., -.'MW}s.�'9'J.K4Y,•`.'x•��ij J`�w�luiu4t.. �ad{:�iK:l.�t�FA�••1U0.!u�i�i . t 3��Lii�l�i."�i�YiE ' i Property owners and 'benefici-al ':nt2rest; Present owners of real property e' .rcei I David Welsh (100%0owner) 24:_a 0 ra_ri Ave. Miami Beach F1 .' 1:40 ' T-ot 1 Block Rhodes • New Biscayne' Amd. PB B L _ = Parce•? IS Walter Mobley ( 10 owner). , 3300 Rice ,Street ';; 6 -Miami F1.' 33133 '• Lot 2 B.lock F •1:hodes New Biscayne Amd PB 131 Parce'lI IT_I Francis Stein (10.0 0 owner 190•Atlantic Ave Garden City Park N.Y:11040' Lot 3 Block F Rhodes New Biscayne -Amd' PB'.-B16 • • ' � ` ' ' 'Par e. 1V � -'' ' � , � :.�: .. . • • c 1 Coconut Grove' Investment Corp..,(100% owner). . ' . - c/o Homero Be La Torre 01S'.W. 3'7th Ave Miami 33133 Lots '4, 5 &6 Block F' Rhodes new -Biscayne` Amd PB B i G Those persons' below are ' first opti.onees -of., Parcel' I=IV inclusive.: Kenneth Myers (•'30%) -1yers, •Kenin, Levirson,Ruffr_er, Frank and Richards-..:., 1428 Brickei l Ave. :Marti F1. Charles F Gottlieb (30 0) .2307 S.W. 27th Ave Miami FL 33133 James -Redford (30 a) 2307 S.W.- 27th Ave Mia:ni F1 33133 Joseph Abreli (ion) . 6245 S.W,12' St Miami F1 3315..E The - benefl_ciaries of, these options. listed above, through . Kennet-h M.. My, ers , thAir tmstee, Dave . entered a nte.: a. contract.'' ;. to assign,. a, " their interests in- the options .to: Lawrence - Marks (Q 0 )) 8 7 4 th Ave ; ,;: , ,'• tt�m!li�Itll+1�1+�!',�Mrtll�irrlrr��.�11I�Igt � `i Y ,�,.yy,�ry� y.� . �G •�+..`7f � M OV41tq 4� ., Y, J ,' ,•lTl`,�'tlNwl1.' "sfV� �+I T4�!� ►!w'�'!�� C\'�':'�7 4Y..i/�,�V P�ci'�. LAW OPONCES MYCIVS, KENIN, L EVINISON, PPANK $ 141CHARD-S A PARTNtRSWO INCLUOINO PROttSWONAL ASSOCIATIONS _ - aautt.l. StRMAN `85 NAR 11 P2 53 SRICKELL EXECUTIVE TOWE" — OtbRA C. COMCN L"O* OU061.1 I498 SRICKELL AVENUE OWN KAPLAN 9APOW f•1*ANK. R A. MARTIN S. FRItOMAN . MIAM1, IrLORIOA 33131 (ISOe-IOta) CAROLC KCNIN OA046uktA tOWIN MA. OtNSdu R6 TQLCPNONt (30b) 371 • 90AI TALLAMASSC[ O►1•ICE WILLIAM M. 6000NICK 1090 LAST LAI►AYtTTt STRtt't RONtRT t. NOWA040 TALLAMASStt. FLORIbA 32501 OAVIb S. KtNIN. Pt A. tbWARO it, LCYINSON March 11, 1985 TtL[MMONt(OOw)2t2.0191 KA?M ttNMANKCY PAUL M. MARMi9M RICMARO A. MORRISON KLNNtTM M. i./TCRS. P. A. — STANLtY C. MYtRS —. PATRICK PATRISSI OCOROt R. RICNAROS. A A. R. M. C. most • WILLIAM C. SUNOSTROM • ILCNC TL64CMIN —. STONCY S. TRAUM JCrIRtT WCITMORN • TIILLAMASStt 0I/Ka City of Miami Planning and Zoning Boards Administration Department Attn: Ms. Gloria Fox Post Office Box 33078 Miami, Florida 33133 Re: Application of Kenneth M. Myers, et al. for Amendment to Zoning Atlas and Application for Planned Development Amendment: 2699 Tigertail and 3173 Southwest 27th Avenue; 3151 Southwest 27th Avenue and 2660 Lincoln Avenue; 3163 Southwest 27th Avenue; and 3167 Southwest 27th Avenue, all in the City of Miami, Florida/Additional Information Regarding Disclosure of Ownership Dear Ms. Fox: Pursuant to the request of Anita Robinson of your j office, the following is a list of the officers and their addresses for Coconut Grove Investments Corporation: 1. Juana D. Houston, President 501 S.W. 37th Avenue Miami., Florida 33135 2. Romero de la Torre, Secretary 501 S.W. 37th Avenue Miami., Florida 33135 Coconut Grove Investments Corporation is closely head. The authorized issue of stock for this corporation is 100 shares of common stock and 50 shares of 10 percent interest 10 I .. w4.w+�•s •'.'1{�4!F ,.Mr .. di..�+?!�'ra 4+,s:4'i: "VUt .':�.. r City of Miami Manning and Zoning Hoards March 11i 1985 Page Two bearing preferred stock, all of which are held by Homero de la Torre. If I can be of any further assistance to you, do not hesitate to contact me. Very; r ;ly yo ru sx Sharon J . Watah Secretary to Kenneth M. Myers /sjw OPTION AGREEMENT THIS OPTION A6R MENT tttade and entered into as of this � day of Septomber, 15$4, by and between tIALTEP. A. MOBLEY (the "Seller") , and E ENNETR M. MYERS # or his designees (the "Purchaser") . PS,CITATIONS A. Seller is the owner of a certain parcel of real property located in Dade County, Florida described as follows: Lot 21 Block F, AMENDED PLAT OF NEW BISCAYNE? according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book "B", at Page 16, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; all of which shall be hereinafter referred to as the "Property". B. Purchaser is desirous of procuring from Seller an option to purchase the Property, for the purchase price and upon the terms and conditions herein set forth, and Seller is desirous of granting to Purchaser such an option, upon the terms and conditions herein set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars and other good and valuable considerations paid simultaneously herewith by the Purchaser to Seller, it is agreed as follows: Section 1. GRANT OF OPTION. The Seller hereby grants unto the Purchaser an option to purchase the Property from the Seller, upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. Section 2. TERM OF OPTION. The option hereby granted by Seller to Purchaser shall be for a term of six months from the date hereof (the "Initial Option Term"), subject to right of renewal by Purchaser for an additional period of 90 days upon the terms and subject to the conditions hereinafter set forth under Section 8 hereof. Section 3. PURCHASE PRICE. The purchase price at which Purchaser may purchase the Property from Seller and at which the Seller shall sell the Property to Purchaser, is the sum of Two Hundred rifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000), paya ie all cash a 0105ing, as defined under Section 9 below, _ ,r. . i. Section 4. TE MS, It Purchaser shall a ercise the option to purchase the Ptoperty from Seller as herein pr6videdj Purchaser shall pay the purchase price to Seller its cash or by cashier`s check at closing (plus or minus prOratiOns and adjustMentis, as herein provided). -Conveyance of the Property by Seller at closing shall be by good and sufficient statutorywarranty deed, and title shall be conveyed free and clear of all liens, encum- brances, reservations, restrictions and easements, except real estate tastes for the year of closing and subsequent years, applicable zoning restrictions, public utility easements of record, rights of parties in possession under existing leases as of the date of this Agreement, and matters appearing on the plat of*the Property (the "Permitted Encumbrances"). Leases shall be conveyed by Assignment of Leases. Section 5. TITLE MATTERS. Within ten days from the date Purchaser gives written notice of his election to exercise the option to purchase, Seller shall deliver to Purchaser at 1428 Brickell Avenue, Suite 700, Miami, Florida 33131, an abstract of title to the Property, brought current to a date subsequent to the execution of this Agreement, showing Seller's title to the Property to be good, marketable and insurable, subject to no liens, encumbrances, restrictions, reservations or easements (including no mineral reservations, drainage reservations or road right-of-way reservations in favor of the Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund of the State of Florida or other governmental entity), except for the Permitted Encumbrances described under Section 4 above, and such other encumbrances as shall be'discharged at closing by the application of pro- ceeds from the purchase price. In the event Seller's title shall not be found to be good, marketable and insurable, seller shall be required to use reason- able diligence to make .its title good, marketable and insurable, r insurable as above provided. tf, after the expiration of the 60 day period, Seller cannot correct the title defects so as to render its title goad, niarketabl.e and insurable AS above provided, then in such event the parties shall be relieved of any further liability arising out of this Agreement, or Purchaser may, at his option, require Seller to deliver title in its then existing condition and proceed to closing (provided that Purchaser has exercised his option as herein provided). Section 6. LEA. any leases in existence covering structures on the Property shall be assigned by Seller to Pur- chaser (whether oral or written leases), and in connection with same, Seller shall provide to Purchaser at closing a list of the names and addresses of all tenants in buildings oil the Property, the amount of rental received from each such buildings, and the name of the tenants occupying same (or whether the structure is vacant), together with the amount of security deposit held by Seller, if any, the amount of advance rent paid by each tenant, if any, the commencement date of the term of each lease and the termination date of such term, and whether each tenant has an option to extend the term of the lease, and if so, the conditions of such option. Any form of tenancy shall be included in the information provided by Seller to Purchaser, included month -to -month or week -to -week oral leases, as well as written leases. Section 7. METHOD OF EXERCISING OPTION. If Purchaser shall elect to exercise the option hereby granted, then Pur- chaser shall give written notice to Seller of his election to exercise such option between the date hereof and the expiration of six months from this date. Such notice shall be deemed given when either delivered personally or when deposited in the United States mail, either registered or certified, with return receipt requested, addressed to Seller, with sufficient postage affixed. The option notice should be directed tO Seller, Attention of; Walter R. Mobley, at 3300 Rice Street, office Not 6, Miami, Florida 33133. 10 If purchaser shall fail to give written not de to 861'er- of its election to exercise the option hereby granted, Within the six month period cominencing on the date hereof, then it shall be conclusively presumed that purchaser has elected not to exercise the option granted by Seller, in which event Seller shall be rel.uased from further obligation under this Option ,�greetnent. Section 3. ZONIN1C ; EXTENDED TERM. within 50 days after the full execution of this Agreement by all parties, purchaser, at his expense, shall make and file with the City of Miami an application to rezone the Property to authorize a combination of residential, office and business use (including a banking facility) under a City of Miami zoning authorization known as a "Planned Development Mixed Use," with the office and commercial use comprising approximately three -fourths of the rentable .and/or salable areas of the project (alternative combinations of zoning classifications may be applied for to accomplish the same result), Purchaser will make every good faith effort to diligently pursue and obtain said zoning use authorizations during the Initial Option Term. If, however, Purchaser is unable to obtain final zoning authorizations prior to,the expiration of the Initial Option Term, and if the zoning application has progressed to the point of the setting of a hearing date before the City of Miami Planning and Zoning Department, then Purchaser shall have the option to extend the Initial Option Term for an additional period of 90 days (the "Extended Term") in order to give Purchaser an opportunity to pursue the zoning application to the final City decision making level, to -wit the City Commission of the City of Miami. If, however, Purchaser elects not to go forward with the zoning application, at any stage, and thereby elects not to pursue this option, it is understood and agreed that Seller, at its election, shall have the right to continue the zoning application in its own name, and on its own behalf# at Seller's expense. .� 4 .. i00i `� i Section 9. CtOgt•= if Purchaser shall dXdreise the option granted to him hereunder, in the manner described, theta the closing of the transaction shall take place at the office of Purchaser's attorney, Myers, xenin, Levinson# Prank 6 Richards, at 1428 Brickell Avenue, Suite 700, Miami, Plorida 33131., at a time designated by Purchaser, within 30 days after the exercise by Purchaser of the option herein granted. Section 10. PRORATIONS, AD JUSTMENTS,___ANO CLOSING COSTS. Municipal improvement liens where the work has been completed shall be paid by Seller at closing. Municipal improvement liens which have been authorized but where the work has not commenced (pending liens) shall be assumed by Purchaser. Seller shall pay for the state documentary stamps and surtax on the warranty deed. The following items shall be prorated as of the date of closing, unless otherwise stated below, and only in the event of closing: tenants' rents; Seller's insurance premiums (provided that Purchaser may obtain his own insurance, in which event there shall be no proration of insurance premiums); license and permit fees, where transferable; utility bills, where applicable; service agreements, where applicable; and such other items as are usually and customarily prorated between purchaser and seller in transactions of the nature contemplated hereby. Buyer shall pay real and personal prop- erty taxes prorated from the date of execution of this Agreement. All prorations and adjustments shall be made against the cash to close. Security deposits shall be taken as a credit by Purchaser against the cash to close, and Purchaser shall in- demnify Seller and hold Seller harmless with respect to claims by any tenant on account of failure to repay a security deposit to the extent so credited. Seller shall be required to pay all sales taxes on rentals required to be paid, if any, currently through date of closing. Section 1.1, DEPOSIT. At such time as the Purchaser exer- cises its option to purchase the Property from Seller, by giving written notice in the manner required by Section 7 hereof, Pur- Chas" shall pdy to NYQra, Kevin, Lavinson, Prank 6 Richards 5 W 1 0 0 12 Trust Account, as oscrow agent, a deposit of $2,500 (by check), and shall procute and forward to Seller the receipt of said Esdrbw Agent acknowledginq receipt of said sum by check, said check to be cleared by the Escrow Agent and held pursuant to the terms, conditions and provisions of this Option Agreement. Section 12. $ROXtR. There is no real estate broker in- volved in this transaction. Section 15. POSSESSION. Possession of the Property shall be delivered by Seller to Purchaser at closing, free from rights of occupancy by any person, firm or entity, except for tenants in occupancy under leases, which leases shall not be renewed by Seller. Section 14. ATTORNEYS' FEES IN EVENT OF DEFAULT. Should it be necessary for either party to this Agreement to seek redress by court proceedings against the other for -any default hereunder, or to defend same, then and in such event, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all costs of such proceedings, including reasonable attorneys' fees from the non -prevailing party at trial and at all appellate levels. Section 15. NOTICES. Any notices required or permitted to be given under then terms of this Agreement shall be given in writing and either delivered in person or mailed by certified or registered United States mail, with postage prepaid, return receipt requested, as follows: To Purchaser: To Seller: Kenneth M. Myers Walter A. Mobley 1428 Brickell Avenue 3300 Rice Street Suite 700 Office No. 6 Miami, Florida 33131 Miami, Florida 33133 or to such other addressees as the parties shall designate in writing. Notice shall be deemed given when deposited in the United States mail in the manner described above, with sufficient prepaid postage affixed to carry same to its destination. Section 16. RISC: OF LOSS. Risk of Loss to the Property between the date of execution of thi$ Agreement and the date of closing shall be upon Seller, and the doctrine known as the M. "Doctrine of tquitabl:e Cdnversioli" shall not be applicable tO this transaction. Section 17. A8816NMtNT. This Agreement shall be freely assignable by either party hereto. Section la . 81NOINC +ST2 M i 'I' , INN M N' AND PLACE .._01' CONTRACT. This Agreement, when executed by all parties before two subscribing witnesses as to each party, shall be binding upon the parties hereto, their heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. The Agreement shall not be construed more strictly against one party than against the other merely by virtue of the fact that it may have been prepared by counsel for one of the parties, it being recognized that both Purchaser and Seller have contributed substantially and materially to the preparation of the Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties•have hereunto executed this Agreement, either individually, where applicable, or by and through their duly authorized corporate officers, on the day and year first above written. Witnesses: f As to the Sefller As to the Seller � d � - - , "/, � /� As to the Vurchaser As to the Purcnase�� SELLER: % Walter A. Mobley r PURCHASER: F3 u OPTT0! ACRES N'T THIS OPTION AGREEMENT Made and entered into as of this z � da cclmm0 �+ of go r, 19 9 4 , by and between FRANCES M. STEIN ( the "Seller"), and XENNETH M. MYERS, or his designees (the "Purchaaer"), RECITATIONS A. Seller is the owner of a certain parcel of real proper.x located in Dade County, Florida described as follows: Lot 3, Block F, AMENDED PLAT OF NEW BISCAYNE, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book "B", at page 16, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; all of which shall be hereinafter referred to as the "Property". B. Purchaser is desirous of procuring from Seller an optiv:: to purchase the Property, for the purchase price and upon the terms and conditions herein set forth, and Seller is desirous of granting to Purchaser such an option, upon the terms and conditions herein set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars and other good and valuable considerations paid simultaneously herewith by the Purchaser to Seller, it is agreed as follows: Section 1. GRANT OF OPTION. The Seller hereby grants unto the Purchaser an option to purchase the Property from the Seller, upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. Section 2. TERM OF OPTION. The option hereby granted by - Seller to Purchaser shall be for a term of six months from the date hereof (the "Initial Option Term"), subject to right of ~ renewal by Purchaser -for an additional period of 90 days upon the terms and subject:to the conditions hereinafter set forth under Section 8 hereof. Section 3. PURCHASE PRICE. The purchase price at which Purchaser may purchase the Property from Seller and at which. the Seller shall self, the Property to Purchaser, is the sun of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000), payable all cash at Section 4. TEi#MS, if purchaser shall dXercise the option to purchase the Property from Seller as herein prtvided, Purchaser shall pay the purchase price to Seller in cash or by cashier's check at closing (plus or minus prorations and adjustments# as herein provided). Conveyance of the property by Seller at closing shall be by good and sufficient statutory warranty deed, and title shall be conveyed free and clear of all liens, encum- brances, reservations, restrictions and easements, except zeal estate taxes for the year of closing and subsequent years, applicable zoning restrictions, public utility easements of record, rights of parties in possession under existing leases as of the'date of this Agreement, and matters appearing on the plat of'the Property (the "Permitted Encumbrances"). Leases shall be conveyed by Assignment of Leases. Section 5. TITLE MATTERS. Within ten days from the date Purchaser gives written notice of his election to exercise the option to purchase, Seller shall deliver to Purchaser at 1428 Brickell Avenue, Suite 700, Miami, Florida 33131, an abstract of title to the Property, brought current to a date subsequent to the execution of this Agreement', showing Seller's title to the Property to be good, marketable and insurable, subject to no liens, encumbrances, restrictions, reservations or easements (including no mineral reservations, drainage reservations or road right-of-way reservations in favor of the Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund of the State of Florida or other governmental entity), except for the Permitted Encumbrances described under Section 4 above, and such other encumbrances as shall be discharged at closing by the application of pro- ceeds, from the purchase price. ` In the event Seller's title shall not be found to be good, marketable and insurable, Seller shall be required to use reason- able diligence to make its title good, marketable and insurable, and Seller shall have an additional period of 60 days beyond the c106iAO date in which to reader its title good, marketable and W 2 W 10012 I insurable. as above provided. If, after the expiration of the 60 day period, Seller cannot correct the title defects to as to fender its title good, marketable and insurable as above provided, then in such event the parties shall be relieved of any further liability arising out of this Agreement, or Purchaser may, at his option, require Seller to deliver title in its then existing condition and proceed to closing (provided that purchaser has exercised his option as herein provided). Section 6. Lam. Any leases in existence covering structures on the Property shall be assigned by Seller to Pur- chaser (whether oral or written leases), and in connection with same, Seller shall provide to Purchaser at closing a list of the names and addresses of all tenants in buildings on the Property, the amount of rental received from each such buildings, and the name of the tenants occupying same (or whether the structure is vacant), together with the amount of security deposit held by Seller, if any, the amount of advance rent -paid by each tenant, if any, the commencement date of the term of each lease and the termination date of,such term, and whether each tenant has an option to extend the term of the lease, and if so, the conditions of such option. Any form of tenancy shall -- be included in the information provided by Seller to Purchaser, included month -to -month or week -to -week oral leases, as well as written leases. Section 7. METHOD OF EXERCISING OPTION. If Purchaser shall elect to exercise the option hereby granted, then Pur- chaser shall give written notice to Seller of his election to exercise such option between the date hereof and the expiration of six months from this date. Such notice shall be deemed given when either delivered personally or when deposited in the United States mail, either registered or certified, with return receipt requested, addressed to Seller, with sufficient postage ai f iXed. The option notice should be directed to Seller, Attention of; Frances M, Stein, at , t W3MW 1001, i If purchaser Shall fail to give written notice to Seller Of its election to exercise the option hereby granted, within the six Month period co=encihq on the date hereof, then it shall be conclusively ;resumed that purchaser has elected not to exercise the option granted by Seiler, in which extent Seller shall be released frog► further obligation under this Option Agreement. section 8. ZONING;_ =TENDED_ TtRM. Within 80 days after the full execution of this Agreement by all parties, purchaser, at his expense, shall make and file with the City of Miami an application to rezone the Property to authorize a combination of residential, office and business use (including a banking facility) under a City of Miami zoning authorization known as a "Planned Development Mixed Use," with the office and commercial use comprising approximately three -fourths of the rentable and/or salable areas of the project (alternative combinations of zoning classifications may be applied for to accomplish the same result). Purchaser will make every good faith effort to diligently pursue and obtain said zoning use authorizations during the Initial Option Term. If, however, Purchaser is unable to obtain final zoning authorizations prior to.the expiration of the Initial. Option Term, and if the zoning application has progressed to the point of the setting of a hearing date before the City of Miami Planning and Zoning Department, then Purchaser shall have the option to extend the Initial Option Term for an additional period of 90 days (the "Extended Term") in order to give Purchaser an opportunity to pursue the zoning application to the final City decision making level, to -wit the City Commission of the City of Miami. If, however, Purchaser elects not to go forward with the zoning application, at any stage, and thereby elects not to pursue this option, it is understood and agreed that Seller, at its election, shall have the right to continue the zoning application in its own name, and on its own behalf, at Seller's expense. 10012��: ; ■ C Section 9. CtOSINCI If Purchases shall exerciae the option granted to hirt hereunder, in the chanter described, then the cloainq of the transaction shall take place at the office of Purchaser's attorney, Myers, Kenin, Levinson, Prank & Richarda, at 1428 nrickell Avenue, Suite 700, Miami# Florida 33131, at a time designated by Purchaser, within 30 days after the exercise by purchaser of the option herein granted. Section 10. PRORATION$ , . _AD,7U$TMtNTS , AND CLOSING COSTS. Municipal improvement liens where the work has been completed or has physically commenced (certified liens) shall be paid by Seller at closing. Municipal improvement liens which have been authorized but where the work has not commenced (pending Liens) shall be assumed by Purchaser. Seller shall pay for the state documentary stamps and surtax on the warranty deed. The following items shall be prorated as of the date of closing: Real and personal property taxes; tenants' rents; Seller's insurance premiums (provided that Purchaser may obtain his own insurance, in which event there shall be no proration of insurance premiums); license and permit fees, where transfer- able; utility bills, where applicable; service agreements, where applicable; and such other items as are usually and customarily prorated between purchaser and seller in trans- actions of the nature contemplated hereby. All prorations and adjustments shall be made against the cash to close. Security deposits shall be taken as a credit by Purchaser against the cash to close, and Purchaser shall indemnify Seller and hold Seller harmless with respect to claims by any tenant on account of failure to repay a security deposit to the extent so credited. Seller shall be required to pay all sales taxes on rentals required to be paid, if any, currently through date of closing. Section 11, DEPOSIT. At such time as the Purchaser user- oises its option to purchase the Property from Seller, by giving writ -ten notice in tho manner required by Section 7 hereof, Pur- chaser shall pay to Myers, Kevin, Levinson t Frank & Richards W 5 .. 10012 { --_ _- __ — ��•�nnwenrn•.nn.�as.�an�m.•nm --- n ;rust Account, as escrows agent, a deposit of $2,580 (by cheek) and shah, procure and Eorward to Seller the receipt of said Escrow Agent acknowledging receipt of said sum by-ohaak, said check to be cleared by the Escrow Agent and held pursuant to the terms, conditions and provisions of this Option Agreement, Section 12. 8 . There is no real estate broker in- valved in this transaction. Section 13. pOSSSSSION. possession of the property shall be delivered by Serer to purchaser at closing, free from rights of occupancy by any person, firm or entity, except for tenants in occupancy under leases, which leases shall not be renewed by Seller. Section 14, ATTORNEYS' FEES IN EVENT OF DEFAULT. Should it be necessary for either party to this Agreement to seek redress by court proceedings against the other for any default hereunder, or to defend same, then and in such event, the ` prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all costs of such proceedings, including reasonable attorneys' fees from the non -prevailing party at trial and at all appellate levels. Section 15. NOTICES. Any notices required or permitted to be given under ther terms of•this Agreement shall be given in writing and either delivered in person or mailed by certified or registered United States mail, with postage prepaid, return receipt requested, as follows: To Purchaser: To Seller: Kenneth M. Myers Frances M. Stein 1428 Brickell Avenue 3167 S. W. 27th Avenue Suite 700 Miami, Florida 33133 Miami, Florida 33131 or to such other addressees as the parties shall designate in writing, Notice shall be deemed given when deposited in the United States mail in the manner described above, with sufficient prepaid postage affixed to carry same to its destination. Section 16. RISK OF LOSS. Risk of loss to the Property between the date of execution of this Agreement and the date of closing shall be upon Seller, and the doctrine known as the 40 0 0.. � 5 F n 00datrine of Equitable Conversion" shall not be applicable to this transaction. Section 1.7, A851dNMENT. This Agreement shall be freely assignable by either party hereto. Section 18. BINDIN AND PL.ACS Off' CONTRACT, This Agreement, when executed by all parties before two subscribing witnesses as to each party, shall be binding upon the parties hereto, their heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. The Agreement shall not be construed more strictly against one party than against the other merely by virtue of the fact that it may have been prepared by counsel for one of the parties, it being recognized that both Purchaser and Seller have contributed substantially and materially to the preparation of the Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto executed this Agreement, either individually, where applicable, or by and through their duly authorized corporate officers, on the day and year first above written. Witnesses: As to the Se ler to the el er C //As to the Purchaser J As to the Purchaser SELLER: Frances M. Stein PURCHASER: 9 100 04 OPTION AGREEMENT THIS OPTION ACC EMENT Made and entered into ae of thiamm 6615boe day of Serwhaat 1564, by and between COCONUT GROVE MVESTMENTS CORP., a Florida corporation (the "Seller"), and KENNETH M. M'YERS, or his designees (the "Purchaser"). RECITATIONS A. Seller is the owner of a certain parcel of real property located in Dade County, Florida described as follows: Lots 4, 5 and 6 of Block F of SAMUEL RHODES AMENDED PLAT OF NEW BISCAYNE, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B, at Page 16 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida a/k/a Lots 4, 5 and 6 in Block F of AMENDED PLAT OF NEW BISCAYNE according to the Plat thereof -as recorded in Plat Book B at Page 16 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; all of which shall be hereinafter referred to as the "Property". B. Purchaser is desirous of procuring from Seller an option to purchase the Property, for the purchase price and upon the terms and conditions herein set forth, and Seller is desirous of granting to Purchaser such an.option, upon the terms and conditions herein set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the sums hereinafter stated, and for other good and valuable considerations, by the Purchaser to Seller, it is agreed as follows: Section 1. 'GRANT OF OPTION;OPTION PRICE. The Seller hereby grants unto Purchaser an option to purchase the Property from Seller, for the initial option price of $'3,000.00 , for the "Initial Option Term" (hereinafter defined), upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. Section 2. TERM OF OPTION. The option hereby granted by Seller to Purchaser shall be for a term of six months from the date hereof (the "Initial. Option Term"), subject to right of renewal by Purchaser for an additional period of 90 days upon the terns and subject to the conditions hereinafter set Earth under Sections 8 and 9 hereof. i I O :��iQ I „ Section J, Vq�PqMgt PIUCt. The purchase P:ridg at which W.A." Purchaser may purchase the Property from Seller and at which the Seller shall sell the Property to Purchaser, is the sum of Nine Hundred Thousand bollard ($900t000) , payable all 'cash at closing, as defined under Section 10 below, Section 4, TERMS, If Purchaser shall emerCise the option to purchase the Property from Seller as herein provided, Pur- chaser shall pay the purchase price to Seller in cash or by cashier's check at closing (plus or minus proratiofts and adjustments, as herein provided). Conveyance of the Property by Seller at closing shall be by good and sufficient statutory warranty deed, and title shall be conveyed free and clear of all liens, encumbrancest reservations, restrictions and easements, except real estate taxes for the year of closing and subsequent years, applicable zoning restrictions, public utility easements of record, rights of parties in possession under existing leases as of the date of this Agreement, and matters appearing on the plat of the Property (the "Permitted Encumbrances"J. Leases shall be conveyed by Assignment of Leases. Section 5. TITLE* MATTERS. Seller has delivered to Purchaser, prior to the execution of this Agreement, a copy of Seller's owner Title Insurance Policy, covering the Property, issued by Lawyers' Title Guaranty -Fund. I Additionally, within ten days after the execution of this Agreement, Seller will furnish to Purchaser its existing abstract of title "as is," with the understanding that Purchaser will continue the abstract and update the title policy, at his expense. Seller's title to the Property is to be good, marketable and insurable, sub- - jest to no liens, encumbrances, restrictions, reservations or easements (including no mineral reservations, drainage reserva- tions or road right-of-way reservations in favor of the Trustees of the. Internal Improvement Fund of the State of Florida or Other governmental entity), except for the Permitted Encumbrances w 2 -, described udder Section 4 above, and such other encumbranode At shall be discharged at closing by the application of pro - deeds from the purchase price, to the event Seller's title shall riot be found to be good, marketable and insurable, Seller shall be required to use reason- able diligence to snake its title good, marketable and insurable, and Seller shall have an additional period of 60 days beyond the date of written notice from Purchaser to Seller of the specified defects in which to render its title good, marketable and insurable as above provided. if, after the expiration of the 60 day period, Seller cannot correct the title defects so as to render its title good, marketable and insurable as above provided, then in such event the parties shall be relieved of any further liability arising out of this Agreement, or Purchaser may, at his option, require Seller to deliver title in its then existing condition and proceed to closing (provided that Purchaser has exercised his option as herein provided). Section 6. LEASES. Any leases in existence covering structures on the Property shall be assigned by Seller to Purchaser (whether oral or written leases), and in connection with same, Seller shall provide to Purchaser at closing a list of the names and addresses of all tenants in buildings on the Property, the amount of rental received from each such buildings, and the name of the tenants occupying same (or whether the structure is vacant), together with the amount of security deposit held by Seller, if any, the amount of advance rent paid by each tenant, if any, the commencement date of the term of each lease and the termination date of such term, and whether each tenant has an option to extend the term of the lease, and if so, the conditions of such option. Any form of tenancy shall be included in the information provided by Seller to Purchaser, including month�to-month or week -to -week oral lease, as well as written. leagges. XF 3 OV IS ■ Section 7. M Tqq! Oy g:{nclsmo Op'riot4. If Purchaser 1 shall elect to exercise the option hereby gtanted, theft purchaser shall give written notice to Seller of his election to exercise such option between the date hereof and the expiration of the Initial Option Term or before the expiration of the "Extended Term" (hereinafter defined). Such notice shall be deemed given when either delivered personally or when deposited in the United States mail, either registered or certified, with return receipt requested, addressed to Seller; with sufficient postage affixed. The option notice should be directed to Seller, Attention of: Homero De La Torre, in care of Delta Shoe Corporation, 501 S.W. Douglas Road,. Miami, Florida 33135. If Purchaser shall fail to give written notice to Seller as herein specified, then it shall be conclusively presumed that Purchaser has elected not to exercise the option granted by Seller, in which event Seller shall be released from further obligation under this Option Agreement. Section B. ZONING; EXTENDED TERM. Within 50 days after the full execution of this Agreement by all parties, Purchaser, at his expense, shall make and file with the City of Miami an application to rezone the Property to authorize a combination of residential, office and business use (trcladtng a ban ' -3-lily) under a City of Miami zoning authorization.known as a "Planned Development Mixed Use," with Ithe office and commercial use comprising approximately t__ee fou-r_:s of the rentable and/or salable areas of the project (alternative combinations of zoning classifications may be applied for to accomplish the same result). Purchaser will make every good faith effort to diligently pursue and obtain said zoning use authorizations during the Initial Option 'term. If, however, Purchaser is unable to obtain final zoning authorizations prior to the expiration of the Initial Option Term, and if the zoning application has progressed to the point of the setting of a hearing date before the City of Miami Planning and Zoning Department, then Purchaser shall, have the option to extohd the Initial Option Teeth for an additri6nAl period of 50 days (the "t.ctended Term") in order to give purchaser an opportunity to pursue the zoning application to the tfinal. City decision making level, to -wit the City CotmigsiOn of the City of Miami. If, however, purchaser elects not to go forward with the zoning application, at any stage, and thereby elects not to pursue this option, it is understood and agreed that Seller, at its election, shall have the right to continue the zoning application in its own name, and on its own behalf, at Seller's expense. Section 9. CONSIDERATION FOR EXTENDED TERM. In the event Purchaser exercises his election to extend the Initial Option Term for all or any portion of the Extended Term, Purchaser shall pay to Seller, in consideration for the Extended Term, the sum of;OffO=per month, or .that portion thereof as is proportionate to the actual length of the Extended Term. Section 10. CLOSING. If Purchaser shall exercise the option granted to him hereunder, in the manner described, then the closing of the transaction shall take place at the office of Purchaser's attorney, Myers, Kenin, Levinson, Frank & Richards, at 1428 Brickell Avenue, Suite 700, Miami, Florida 33131, at a time designated by Purchaser, within 30 days after the exercise by Purchaser of the option herein granted. Section 11. PRORATIONS, ADJUSTMENTS..AND CLOSING COSTS. Municipal improvement liens where the work has been completed or has physically commenced (certified liens) shall be paid by Seller at closing. Municipal improvement liens which have been authorized but where the work has not commenced (pending liens) shall be assumed by Purchaser. Seller shall pay for the state , documentary stamps and surtax on the warranty deed. The follow- ing items shall be prorated as of the date of closing: Real and personal property taxes; tenants' rents;'Seller's insurance premiums (provided that Purchaser may obtain his own insurance# in which went there shall be no proration of insurance premiums) W 5 W 100 license and permit fees, where transferable; utility bil.ld# whefe applicable: service agreements, where applicable, and such other items as are usually and customarily prorated between purchaser and seller in transactions of the nature contemplated hereby. All prorat ons and adjustments shall be made against the cash to close. Security deposits shall be taken as a credit by Purchaser against the cash to close, and Purchaser shall. indern- nify Seller and hold Seller harmless with respect to claims by any tenant on account of failure to repay a security deposit to the extent so credited. Seller shall be required to pay all sales taxes on rentals required to be paid, if any, currently through date of closing. Section 12. DEPOSIT. At such time as the Purchaser exercises its option to purchase the Property from Seller# by giving written notice in the manner required by Section 7 hereof,' Purchaser shall pay to Myers, Kenin, Levinson, Frank & Richards Trust Account, as escrow agent, a deposit of $9,000 (by check), and shall procure and forward to Seller the receipt of said Escrow Agent acknowledging receipt of said sum by check, said check to be cleared by the Escrow Agent and held pursuant to the terms, conditions and provisions of this Option Agreement. Section 13. BROKER. There is no real estate bicker in- volved in this transaction. Section 14. POSSESSION. Possession of the Property shall be delivered by Seller to Purchaser at closing, free from rights of occupancy by any person, firm or entity, except for tenants in occupancy under leases, which leases shall not be renewed by Seller. Section 15. ATTORNEYS' TEES IN EVENT OF DEFAULT. Should it be necessary for either party to this Agreement to seek redress by court proceedings against the other for any default hereunder, or to defend same, then and in such event, the prevailing party shall, be entitled to recover 411 costs of sueh proceedings, including reasonable attorneys, fees from the nOn-Prevailing party at trial and at all appellate levels. W 6 W Section 16. NOT_ICM Any notices required or permitted to be given under the terms of this Agreement shall be giveh in writing and either delivered in person or mailed by certified or registered United States mails with postage prepaid, retUrn receipt requested, as follows: To Purchaser: To Seller: Kenneth M. Myers 1428 8rickell Avenue Suite 700 Miami, Florida 33131 C/o Homero be La Torre Delta Shoe Corporation 501 S.W. Douglas Road Miami, Florida 331335 or to such other addressees as the parties shall designate in writing. Notice shall be deemed given when deposited in the United States mail in the manner described above, with sufficient prepaid postage affixed to carry same to its destination. Section 17. RISK OF LOSS. Risk of loss to the Property between the date of execution of this Agreement and the date of closing shall be upon Seller, and the doctrine known as the "Doctrine of Equitable Conversion" shall not be applicable to this transaction. Section 18. ASSIGNMENT. This Agreement shall be freely assignable by either party hereto. Section 19. BINDING AGREEMENT, INUREMENT AND PLACE OF CONTRACT. This Agreement, when executed by all parti.es before two subscribing witnesses as to each party, shall be binding upon the parties hereto, their heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. The Agreement shall not be construed more strictly against one party than against the other merely by virtue of the fact that it may have been prepared by counsel for one of the parties, it being recognized that both Purchaser and Seller have contributed substantially and materially to the preparation of the Agreement. IN WITNESS WHIEnOF, the parties have hereunto executed this Agreement, either individually, where applicable, or by W 7 or a 1 aftd thttUqh their duly authoti2ed dbtPbrfttO 6EE'der8l on the day end Peat �ifgt above Wfitten, COCONUT GROVt INVtSTMENTS CORP6 % Xs to the Seller sy, �±�- r pri2!lsid(aftt As to the Seller PTIRCHASER: 20NIN6 80ARb TRANSCRIPT OF 5 a Aporoxi:�tetely_ 31i1 31 9 Sty 27._ Avenue and 2G60 Lincoln avenue and 2699 TigeYtai] Avenue Lots 1 through 6 Block F A148NDtD PLAT OF NEW 81SCAYNE (8-16) Change of Zoning Classification in the Official Zoning Atlas of Zoning ordinance 9500, as amended, from RG-2/5 General Residential (with SPI-3 overlay) to RGY-2/6 Ceneral Residential (without 8PI-3 overlay), NOTE: This application is filed with a waiver of time request to allow a simultaneous filing of a request for a Planned Development Mined Use Change of Zoning on this site. While this request is not necessarily required, it is submitted as a procedural safeguard. -AND- Approximately 3151-3199 SW_27 Avenue and 2660 Lincoln Avenue and 2699 Tigertail Avenue Lots 1 through 6 Block F AMENDED PLAT OF NEW BISCAYNE (B-16) Change of Zoning Classification in the Official Zoning Atlas of Zoning Ordinance 9500, as amended, from RG-2/6 General Residential to PD-MU Planned Development - Mixed Use, on above site, with approval of the development plans on file. NOTE: This application also requires the approval of a Special Exception for the replacement of the existing nonconforming service station in accordance with Section 2105; a Variance from Article 12, Section 1205, and Article 9, Subsection 906.3 (providing 15' of 25' required external yards) and a Variance from Article 12, Section 1205 and Article 6, Subsection 606.2.6, providing an east side residential yard of 6.66' (10' required). Secretary filed proof of publication of Legal Notice and administered oath to all persons wishing to testify on this item PROPONENTS: 9 OPPONENTS: 4 Mr. Perez-Lugones: Mr. Chairman. Mr. Gort; Thank you, sir. Mr. Whipple. Mr. Whipple: Mr. Chairman, members of the Board, Richard Whipple for the Planning Department. The Planning Department recommends denial of both of these items and we'd like to go through a brief history and into the individual reasons that we're recommending denial on both of these applications. The brief history is that approximately 2� years ago, part of this property, approximately three lots, I believe it was 41 and 6, petitioned for a rezoning under the old Zoning ordinance 6871 for rezoning from Multiple Family Residential to RC Residential.-©ff.ioe. At that time, this Board, I believe, looked favorably upon that application but upon going to 1;he Wgislative body of the Catty Commission, the requested change of oning was turned down, Swbeeguent to that time we've had gui t-e . a bit of March 18, 19$5, itOm* 5 4 6 Zoning so4rd 100 ,1 ' activity in this area, not directly but close to, but reflects upoft this propetty. The first being a study that was done on the South 8aybhdre properties, those properties lying between Tigertail and South 8ayshoro Drive which this property is oft the edge, to the northerly edge, northwesterly edge, and in that study it did address this area to the extent that the study felt that the zoning Was appropriate, however, there seemed to be a need and perhaps an opportunity by which to encourage Planned Development on those areas going from Tiqortail northward along 27th Avenue by which to provide a better mix and perhaps a better utilization of land with respect to this mixed use and planned development approach. Subsequent to that study which is in writing and in print, we had a request from the City Commission, t believe, approximately a month or two months ago by which pursuant to a change of zoning occurring at Aviation, approximately Aviation and ... off of 27th Avenue for consideration of low density residential to office, the City Commission said that the corridor of 27th Avenue should be studied which we ... that is a direct assignment to the Department and we will be pursuing that study as quickly as staff is available to do that. So in light of this activity and the recommendations to this point and the request of the City Commission, we feel that the requested change of zoning which is the first part of application..6of the application to increase the intensity of development is inappropriate at this time and we believe it is a wrong direction at this time, particularly in light of the fact that we have not had the opportunity to do the 27th Avenue corridor study. Now the question is why is this wrong? You are being asked to not only change the sector number of the underlying district, you're being asked to accept that new sector number, erase the SPI limitation, SPI-3 limitations, in this area and substitute a PD-MU Planned Development - Mixed Use. Now what does this mean? Well number one, When the study suggested that planned development approaches in this area would be appropriate and I'm talking about the Bayshore Study, the planned development approach allows and provides for nominal increases in intensity by which to accommodate mixed use and to go through the process of the planned development. This increase is approximately 15% of the total floor area that you could get under the existing zoning, increases it approximately 15%. In the case of the subject property, this probably amounts in the vicinity of 8,000 sq. ft. of additional intensity and we're talking about a project of 70 or 80 thousand square feet, plus or minus, depending where you want to start but that's not what the petition is before you tonight. The petition before tonight wants to change the zoning, to change the sector number, get the benefit of the PD and you're going to have the applicants indicate to you, well they're not going to use all that they're entitled to but it amounts from the base zoning that exists today to what they are asking a 400 increase in intensity. What is that 40% increase amount to? It amounts to something in the vicinity of probably 26,000 sq. ft. We believe that this is...would be an irrational grant, a personal privilege, something that somebody else is not entitled to and therefore is inappropriate. We had the opportunity to meet with the applicant - s the past week, discuss the problems that we had with the project. There was some confusion with respect to what the Department wanted and didn't want which mainly was related to the question of retaining a service station or gas station on the -corner. It was indicated to the applicant that we did not want a service station. If they did choose to provide refueling pumps without the service, that was acceptable to us and it was their option whether they include it or exclude it. It's my understanding that plans have been submitted excluding that service facility and we have no problem with that exclusion. We do have a problem with the intensity of development. We requested A lowering of the height of the structures and a reduction of the intensity pursuant to What the existing zoning allows, we were proffered, although it may not be proffered before you this evening, a reduction of one floor Qf the 2 March IS,, 1985, Items 5 4 6 Zoning Board 10012 residential portion of the building but no reduction in the cottnercial portion of the building. As you might be aware, the 6PI-3 has a height limit I believe of 40 ft. or 45 ft,; the office portion of the structure fronting along 8W 27th Avehue,is 66, approximately 66-70 ft. We believe this height is excessive and Of course, that relates to the intensity, extra intensity that they are requesting before you this evening. The other two points that we raised with the applicants which are as a partial addressing. one had to do with the setback to the rear abutting that lot 7 which is occupied by a four-story multiple family apartment and that the ground fluor of the residential structure proposed and if I may just stop there for a minute. Please understand that PD-rMU carries with it a set of concept plans and if we say that a structure can be within 5 ft. of the lot line when we approve the PD-MU tonight, when it comes to the building plans that's what's allowed. In fact, what they proposed was, I believe, 6.6 ft, for the ground floor or two, and then a setting back of the upper residential floors to meet the spacing formula and requirements which it does meet but I suggest to you that 6.6 ft, really is not sufficient spacing between two multiple family developments and we raise that point. They proffered the possibility, and if they want to do it tonight fine, that this setback could be increased probably an additional 5 or 6 ft. so that it will align with the upper floors of the building which would meet the spacing formula. The last point that we had a concern with was that space.between the office structure and the residential structure. This area is a plaza area raised one story above the ground level, contains parking underneath and has a spacing of approximately 23 or 24 ft. between the four-story residential or a five -story residential and a five or six -story office. lie believe this lacks the opportunity to provide a better livability situation which, in fact, is the intent of the PD district and that you have an opportunity to provide a development that provides more amenities and more livability than what you would normally associate with a lot by lot development. For these reasons, we are recommending denial of both of the items before you tonight. Mr. Gort: Thank you, Mr. Whipple. Mr. Campbell. Mr. Campbell: Mr. Chairman, members of the Board, in the past we have...we, the Department of Public Works, has had comments on the capacity of the sanitary sewers and so on in this area. Assuming, of course, that the development goes up as per plans on file which indicate approximately 60,000 sq. ft. of commercial -office and 24 residential units, assuming that that takes places, then we have no objection as far as the sanitary sewers go. My understanding from counsel is that even though this ... part of this is application is a change of zoning under the PD-MU, there are certain conditions which can be placed on it, on the PD-MU which would allow us, the Department, to request the dedication of the necessary right-of-way along SW 27th Avenue with a.,,including a 25' radius at Lincoln Avenue. We would so request if you see fit to grant the second portion of this application. My understanding is that the applicant is aware, fully aware of this and has taken this into consideration in his development of plans, Turning to the comments from Dade County Traffic and Transportation, the loaded twin truck bays on Lincoln Avenue may provide a visibility problem for passenger vehicles entering and exiting the parking under the structure. Mr, Whipple has indicated that they will be moving, possibly moving the entire structure back, Am I correct, Whipple? Would the easterly W411... Would that,,,at the property,,,won't that move back at ground level? $o that,,,in that case, then we would reassess the 14c4tiQn and/or width acid size and so forth of the truck bays with respect to the passenger vehicle access to the structure, Thank you, f Zoning Board 100` Mt. Gott: okay, thank you, Mr. Campbell. Okay, sir. Mr. Myers.. Mt. Chairman) members of the Board, my natte is Kenneth Nt. Myers, attorney, 1428 Bridkell Avenue, biiatii, Vlorida. I am the attorney of record for the applicant and one of the principals in ownership of the applicant. Mr. chairman, we have two complete sets of plans and since this is a planned Bevelopment - Mixed rase proposal, we thought for the donvenience of the Board, if you deaire, l will put the two sets up beforo you and you can follow along with us as we make our presentation. (Gave the plans to the Board.) Mr. Gott: This is the same plan as the ones we have on file? Mr. Myers: Yes, sir. Mr. Gott: Okay. Mr. Myers: Members of the Board, we have worked long and hard to plan and present to you a project in keeping with what City planners and members of the Commission have talked about and dreamed about for years as to what they would like to see as the development of 27th Avenue in the future and that is knowing that 27th Avenue is projected to be a main arterial thoroughfare and is projected, hopefully, to be one of the beautiful entrance ways into Coconut Grove that we as long time residents of this community, as I am, would love to see. That is exactly what we have developed in plan here in keeping with that idea as a new and beautiful entrance into Coconut Grove starting all the way from Dixie Highway into the Grove. That is a Planned Development - Mixed Use for this one block area from Tigertail to Lincoln. That is comprised of office space and residential units with —in a blend and mix of a project that provides over 40 percent of open space, malls, terraces, walkways, pedestrian malls along —the pedestrian mall more than 303 ft. along 27th Avenue, 20 ft. in width. As you will see during the course of our presentation --making a beautiful and good ratio of open area in this project to total building, that is what we would like to see along 27th Avenue in the future. I'm sorry the Planning Department hasn't completed its 27th Avenue study but sometimes when you go and you obtain and this is really a once in a lifetime capability that I ... I don't really think it's going to be done again, you obtain options from five different, very different people, owners of small houses in that block and you tie that entire block area together to present to the City a beautiful Planned Unit Development. I don't believe we're,going to be able to wait for a point in time down on the future road, nine months from or a year from now, when the study is completed when we know, when you know since you've heard about it for years and you yourselves have talked about it for years and the Commission has talked about it for years, what you would eventually like to see as a planned mixed development along 27th Avenue. What we have here, you will see as you study these plans that we have a floor area ratio, an FAR of 80,000 sq. ft. Mr. Whipple was, not deliberately so, but a little misleading, with all due respects, he said, and you remember in his presentation, that this is going to be "from present zoning to what they want, a 40 percent increase in density". The way that really should be phrased is what would you normally allow and what would the increase in density be. That's a sector 5 area. A sector 5 area at a PD-MU, Planned Development - Mixed Use, which you would ordinarily allow, would already allow 614405 sq, ft. SQ we're going ... he said that a normal increase to be allowed would maybe 10 percent above that to 70,000 sq. ft. We're going to $0,000 sq- ft, which is the only economically feasible thing, the minimum thing that a builder or a developer can live with and yo►; could hear a string of builders and developers from here for the next decade and they will tell you that that's the minimum that 4 March 18, 1985, Items 5 4 8 zoning Board they could pot8ibly live with for i Planned bevd1dpfhoht - Mixed Use of this sort, That's only a IS percent iftdrdaddp not a 40 percent iftdreago, A 15 petdeht increase frog what you would ordinarily allow in the sector 5 under a Planned Development - Mixed Use and this it a sector 5 toning now, The only rcag6h why we're asking to go to sector 6 is not to utilize all of,the sector 6 that we could allow which would be 59,000 sq. ft. but under dbntradt toning -which is a Planned Development - Mixed Use proposal, it is a contract with the City that we Must build exactly according to these plans with all the covenants and protection that you require of record. That contract ta7S that we are only going to go 15 percent over what we'd normally be required.,.we'd normally be allowed for a Planned Development - Mixed Use in the sector 5 zoning. go that for a project tUdh As this with the open areas, with the residential units provided, we believe is a project that can be accepted easily. Now, incidentally, you seer -who's pointing there how? Somebody. Oh, Gloria! I'm glad you Just did that, Gloria, because the residential units Shown in white where she is pointing now, exactly is adjacent to our project. It backs to our project, the residential units that we are going to build will be 8,8 ft. from that project. Not one person has objected in that entire condominium building and as you just put up the green so one person evidently filed in favor of it. so that's interesting to see that the residential people most affected, directly next to us in this project, I don't know how many are in there, 60, 70, 80, but not one objected and one filed in favor which is quite interesting to met I just saw that tonight. Mr. Whipple# Mr. Chairman and members of the Board, eluded to the Bayshore Drive Development Study which already has been done. Let me just read to you what the Planning Department —just a piece of it ... what the Planning Department said in the study as to 27th Avenue. "With the widening of 27th Avenue to a four -lane boulevard," and it will be 110 ft. wide and the Public Works is speeding up that project, they already have a great majority of the dedications to do this, "and the economic decline of older apartment structures between Bird Avenue and Tigertail Avenue," we all know what that area looks like now, "mounting pressure for redevelopment along 27th Avenue requires consideration of mixed -use projects to stimulate renewal. Due to limited opportunities for multi -family housing development in Coconut Grove and the critical need to assure that as existing moderate cost rental apartments are lost, they are replaced with smaller, affordable housing units." That's what we're doing. it is recommended strongly that housing remain a priority use on 27th Avenue by linking housing -- listen to this, this is what our Planning Department has already said -- by linking housing to stronger office and commercial development opportunities, the likelihood of achieving affordable residential redevelopment is enhanced. The truth of the matter is that we will never see any reasonable residential development along 27th Avenue unless you link it to compatible commercial development in a compatible Planned Development - Mixed Use type of project and that's what we're presenting to you. We have here to answer questions and to comment along the way a representative from our architect's office, Anna Reksite who is here who is an architect from Robin and Boscow office, David Morgan who is also here who is part of our partnership group. -The other members of our partnership group are Charles Gottlieb back there somewhere, Jim Redford who could not be here tonight, Joe Abrell who could not be here tonight and Larry Marks who is here tonight, who is the builder, developer in the project. The...We are within what is required by the Planning Department for the ratio of residential to commercial. The ratio is 75-25, 75 percent commercial, 25 percent residential. We are within that. That's exactly what the ratio is. The office building is five floors, the residential is four floors, YQQ see the open mall space yourself, you might also see, you may not be able to see it completely, there is a convenience store where the gas station used to be, approximately in that area, and we have March 18,, 1985,, .Zoning Board an open sidewalk cafes l hope to see► eventually► 27th Avenue with a running pedestrian mall all the way down as we have planned all the way down with the sidewalk cafe type of things that we have presented here with that type of activity in the evenings in Coconut Grove. I think it's a beautiful project► a beautiful plan. We will certainly consider any type of reasonable changes and input that this Board desires and would like to see. We met with the Tigertail residents, the Tigertail Association with 'Thelma Altshuler and other members of the organization and Thelma made an interesting suggestion which we would certainly consider and she said that and I'm certain she can speak for herself (Ms. Altshuler stated from the audience what she will) ... the will. But she suggested something about the facade of the building should be softened a little and we are willing to take any reasonable suggestions on the facade of the building with textures, materials, substitute textures, whatever the Board in your input would like to see, we would make any kind of presentations along that way. It's the PAR and the bulk ... the building area that is the key to the PD-Mid. The facade, of course► while -it is important aesthetically and beauty wise, is not the key to the PD-MLA. We will be willing to do whatever suggestions you desire with respect to the facade of the building to keep it in more of the Coconut Grove look. Now, if you have any questions or if Anna or David wish to add anything to my general presentation, we would be glad to do it at this point. Mr. Gort: Mr. Myers, I suggest... we're going to have some people speaking in opposition, if any question do arise during the presentation of the opposition please write them down so you can answer them afterwards. Those in opposition, you're welcome to come up. Ms. Holshauser:' I need to be sworn. I'm sorry I wasn't here when you were swearing us in. (Mr. Perez-Lugones administered oath to Ms. Holshauser.) Ms. Holshauser: I'm Joann Holshauser. I live at 4230 Ingraham Highway. I'm president of the Coconut Grove Civic Club. Boy, I thought I had heard Bob Traurig do some numbers, on the folks in the City but I tell you right now, I tell you it's a draw. If I was going to build something in Coconut Grove, it would be hard now to pick which one I was going to get and if I laugh at any mortal thing tis it that I may not weep. I'm the person who fought for a year for the Coconut Grove parks as some of you may remember. I'm not sure Mr. Myers remembers it or even knew it but one of the parks I fought for had his name on it. I'm not so sure but if I'd heard this I might have left that park out and let Jack Luft put in a confounded skating rink in it and a parking lot. This is probably one of the ugliest buildings and one of the least workable solutions I have seen for any piece of property in Coconut Grove in a long time. In about 1980 or 81, whenever we were beginning the talk about the Metrorail I asked Jack Luft if it wouldn't be possible somehow to convene some meetings on 27th Avenue since it was obviously going to be very important what went on there and at that time suggested that it would behoove us to sit down and talk about mixed use developments there and try to do things like joint ventures with several large builders, contractors groups to do some nice things on there. I still had hoped that we could possibly do that and not be minced away by one plan after the other like this. What you've got before you is a .urge office building with some walkways that they're going to call malls and some sidewalks that they've got to have anyway unless they're going to build right down to the property line and the apartment in the back looks just about like it, if you just close you eyes and follow me, you can go down to Grand avenue or to Qvertown or any other place in Dade County and you can see apartments that look just the same. YQu go up the Stairs and there's this long open balgony and a 6 March let 1985, Items 5 & f► zoning Board 1 11 door opens into each unit and you've got an efficiency and one bedroott and an efficiency. What's diLferent? That's not "I'odOnu- Grove, that's..►well, it's part of the Grove but it shouldn't be, There's nothing glamorous about that, there's nothing desirable about that* I don't know how--(refotting to the easel) it this 6 ft, tall? Is this about 6 ft. tall? It think it is, isn't it? If you all just look at this. This building will be this far from the back property line and on the other side of that is another building, This is not Coconut Grove the way it could be. This is not Coconut Grove the way it should be and I'm still going to stand up here and say just what I had said to various ones of you and I'm sorry, I didn't even welcome hit. Gott and I.4r. Freixas, hello, it's been a long time, it's good to see you back but I've said it before for years and I'm still saying it, the better they design it and the better they build it the more money they'll make off it in the long run. We're not asking people not to build in the Grove, we're just saying do it nice, do it tastefully, do it so that it accommodates to the neighborhood. This is not fair to the people who are in that poor little beleaguered section now between 27th and Tigertail and South bixie because if this happens all along 27th on one side, I see some familiar faces out here, they're all here waiting to see what's going to happen. They're all going to be on us next month and the month after. See, I know them, Mr. Freixas, you know that. I recognize them. They're in here, they're going to be right after us like a shot and it's not going to be just on 27th Avenue, they're going to go for the streets behind it on either side and once they've got the streets behind it on either side, they're going to go for the next streets. Now it's you -ails chance right here, please, hold them on this. Let's talk about it. If they're going to ask for changes, let's talk about doing substantive changes that are for the good of all of us. Let's sit down and talk about imaginative, creative ways to use that piece of property, to use it nicely, to put some combined residences and offices and some shops there, that's a wonderful way to live, we're all for it, but please not this. This is, I repeat, one of the most un-Coconut Grove buildings and plans I've seen in a long time and we ask you please either turn it down or defer it and let's work on it. Thank you. Mr. Gott: Thank you, ma'am. Next. Ms. Altshuler: Hi, my name is Thelma Altshuler. I live at 3100 Jefferson Street which is at the corner of Lincoln Avenue. I first would like to mention some of the points that I. think were not relevant such as the length of time that this plan has been worked on, the length of residence of the people who are proposing it and whether or not it's economically feasible. I'm very tired of being asked to help make profits for developers. Since I am the person who suggested that this is not the proper facade for a Coconut Grove kind of building, I think I need to talk about that. I'm not sure whether an architect can take a building which looks the way this one does and put something plastered on it like wood type formica and make it into a Grove building, I think it would be a fundamental change. I know that it is not a matter of retaining a wonderful looking service station on that Corner.: I am as sentimental as the next person and I can remember several years ago arguing against the office building which was proposed on a much smaller piece of property and I'know that people have the right to build and that perhaps something can be built there and we don't have to retain the service station but I do think that it is a very significant spot. I think that that spot on our side, my side of Tigertail with access on Lincoln presents a very serious precedent, It is too much, there is to small a place between buildings, The apartments are very tiny, 550 sq. ft. and I don't know hoer affordable they would be, I think ... you're in a sense you're getting an instant slum, It is the wrong look for the Grove. I've heard about the percentages and I realize that it's only this many more percentage than that but it is a sector 6 — i$ a 7 March 18f 1985, items 5 & 6 zonO7 Dpsrd # 10 Q1p� tedt6r 6 and as jdahh pointed out other people are going to be d6tftihq along clairfting their right to do as Much at they want- I this is permitted, it would be an inexorable March to but homes. Othiet people are going to be watching very carefully what is done hero tonight, I Am Very alarmed by what t am hearing. I would like very much to wait for more serious planning on what 27th Avenue should look like and t hope that you will turn it ,down, Mr, Oort'. Thank you, Next. mr, Cooke -Yarbrough: Mr. Cbairmaftj members of the Board, good evening, My name it Steven Cooke -Yarbrough. I live at 3555 Crystal Court in the north Orove. I'm a Civil engineer. I'm also the co-chairman of the issues Research Committee for the Tigertail Association. 1 have had a very brief look at the -plans. I had to do this yesterday since I didn't know they existed until they were given to me on Saturday. 1 am very concerned on many points. First of all, this is now a residential area, it's RG-2i it abuts an RO-1/3. We have an -RO across the street which we don't believe should be there but unfortunately, it's there. That you're really doing through the ... what's really being asked for, as far as I can seep through the various changes and there are so many of them that are being asked for, it's in fact turning that area into an Ro. It only has one difference from the RO on the other side of Tigertail and that is that they are, in fact, allegedly putting in some apartments but if you look at those apartments, I don't think anybody would live in them especially on the plaza level where you've got general public walking up and down right outside the door of the living area and the one's on the end have one window in the whole apartment, 1 think actually what's going to happen if those go in that they won't be rented as apartments, they'll be rented as other offices and we're going to end up with a totally office building there. The facade of the building is a disaster. It just looks like what you see further up 27th Avenue glass slabs and you can change the material but it's the shape of the structure it's just a wall sitting there. That isn't Coconut Grove. it isn't what we need there. This is'a residential area, it abuts on a residential area. Another thing that worries me, if you change the zoning of this to what's being asked for, right adjacent to it is now a 1/3. What's about —aren't we meant to have a transition between one zone and another? There's no space for a transition if you change the zoning here from an R-2/5 which it is now and suddenly bump it up to an office what in fact is an RO provision, there's no transition into RG-1/3. There's some other points that I would like to bring out. Section 502.1 of the Zoning Code states the PD districts and this is a PD district, it's got an MU tacked on the end of it, should be located with respect to arterial and collector streets as to provide direct access to and from such districts without creating traffic along minor streets and residential neighborhoods outside the district. Let's look at this. The district is the khaki colored bit. That is the new district they're asking to have provided. The access into that is on Lincoln Avenue. Lincoln Avenue has a right-of-way 50' wide. This parking space forz174 vehicles coming in and out onto Lincoln Avenue. Now are you going to tell me that all of that traffic is not going to go up Lincoln Avenue or Darwin, it's all going to try and get out on 27th? No, of course it won't. When 27th is blocked up they're going to go right through the residential area. So I think that the access onto Lincoln Avenue is strictly against the regulations on 5,21, Another thing that confuses me, Section 501 says, "A Planned Development is a) land under unified control to be planned and developed as a whole,", Is this under unified wntrol at the moment or do they just have QptiQns if they can get that zoning changed? Gentlemen, this ... it's the tip of the iceberg, We go bask to this old saying of the domino theory. If this is granted and they're asking for every, .as far As I can make out they're a March 18# 19654 Items 5 4 Q, Zoning Board 100 asking for every variation in the book, it's too close in the back, it's too close in the front, l can't see that they even clot the required,.,for business ... for an office district. I think they must have 25 ft. clearance Lrori the right-of-way line to the front of the building; it isn't there, itow maybe they're asking for exception of that. -- What's the other point t had? -- it just looks like too much being crowded into too small a space. There's very little separation between the access...there's no separation between the access to the office section and the access to the apartment section, That isn't a good ... that isn't a good plan because people can even wander around looking, saying I'm going to such and such an office and end up robbing all the apartments on there when people are out at work. There's no control, there is no way of controlling access to their apartments like a dooiman or even have a security key to get in. There is no parking in the building convenient to the stores. You have to go down into the underground basement. That won't encourage people to come to the stores. I think when we talk about minted use on 27th Avenue, when you're talking east of Bird Zioad, I think the Planning Department really wanted to see a mix of residential and convenience stores which makes a district or makes a village. We don't need more office space especially not in the Grove. Two or three days ago there was an article in the Herald which pointed out at the present time there's five million square feet of office space either unoccupied or under construction right now in Dade County and there's several million more come up every week, you can see so and so's going to...down in Dadeland there is somebody is going to put up three more towers and Mr. Roby's going to put up millions of square feet. Why do we have to take a residential area, put in office space for which there is no really clear demand. This is just destroying what could be a very nice residential area if it was properly developed as a residential area with some small commercial. Office space we have coming out of our ears so please, gentlemen, just keep this part of 27th Avenue residential, primary residential because across the street is residential, behind it is residential, why should it all change? Thank you. Mr. Gort: Thank you, sir. Anyone else? Anyone else in opposition? Okay, sir, you've got a few minutes for rebuttal. Are you going to do the rebuttal or you know the... Mr. Marina: I'm going to be one of the people rebutting. I'm Anthony G. Marina, 3125 Mary Street. I'm the president of the Grove Gateway Association which was formed a few months ago. I would like to give you a brief reason as to why the Association was formed and who the members of this new association are. After waiting for several years for 27th Avenue to be planned, when the rapid transit station became a reality we decided that it was time that we came to the City Commission and we requested that a plan be enacted that would make 27th .Avenue a reality. The majority of property owners on 27th Avenue banded together and I say the majority because we don't have them all but we expect that within the next few months we will be perhaps an 80 to 85 percent property owner association along 27th Avenue. Our members come from north of Dixie Highway all the way down 27th Avenue till we intersect with Bayshore. The Gateway Association also has members from 28th Terrace, from Cocoanut, from Bird Road, Shipping, Mary Street and I think I'll stop mentioning because this could get to be quite ... our main concern was 27th Avenue is a State road. It is planned to be widened to a four lane road which might or might not have a median, Our main concern was to convince the County which incidentally is the authority right now who has the responsibility of obtaining the right-of-way to widen 27th Avenue, We wash for it to be landscaped with a heavy median which would imitate or be .lose to what Srickell and Coral Way are right now. There is some difficulty with that because the street is relatively short from 9 March i8, 1985, items 5 4 6 Zoning Board 1001 Dixie to South tlayghdre you do not have more than six of seven blocks go thord's been several alternatives but the main tea.46hing behind this is that if we did not do something on 27th Avenue, we might be waiting for five or six years before the County Commission had the funds available to develop 27th AvehUoi Twenty-seventh it a very funny street. tt is a historic street. tt it the entrance way to this part of Coconut Grove, The street .is basically an office street Under Present zoning. The oetidOg extend from Dixie Highway where you have a tremendous VAa granted by the proximity to the rapid transit station; that PAR is approximately 4. As you go south on 27th Avenueo you get into what is residential -office. These people can build an office building. They have not to grant any consideration whatsoever, if they do not wish to, to residential. This zoning stops at the intersection of 27th Avenue and Bird. You then skip for a couple of blocks till you hit Tigertail with a residential zoning and again you start with the heavy office zoning which is the RO-5/6 which is the heaviest density, except for the one next to the rapid transit station, allowed in Coconut Grove. We came to the City Commission, we introduced ourselves, the City Commission has three times, to my knowledge, in the past three months requested from the Planning Department that the 27th Avenue study be not only enacted# but completed rapidly. Unfortunately, this is no reflection on our Planning Department. The Planning Department has been lacking five planners for the past few months and when they were permitted to hire the five planners, we had a slight derailment called the hiring freeze so Sergio was not only not able to start the study, he couldn't even hire the planners. At this moment, right nowi we still do not have a planner for 27th Avenue. The Association has suggested and might be forced to hire, with the help of the City with some City funds, a planner for 27th Avenue. The reason behind this is that a lot of the property owners which, incidentally, are not all developers, I happen to be the president of the Association, I am a developer, my property are development properties but some of our members, in fact, a great number of our members are individual property owners with single houses who have waited for a very long time to see something concrete happen on 27th Avenue. This particular project happens to fall within those two blocks that are in my reasoning sort of iffy. There is some residential there. There are some old apartment buildings. There are some quad -duplexes and some duplexes but the street is dirty. The street is completely riddled by telephone poles. There is not any sidewalks that connect either to Bayshore or to the rapid transit station. It is dusty. It is completely littered with trash. There is a tremendous lack of parking. It is basically an area that has been waiting in transition for many years and all of you have to drive through 27th Avenue and you know what Via talking about. Incidentally, there are four blocks at Bird Road which are suffering from this same type of neglect. This project presented to you is brought in two stages. They're applying for two different things. They're asking you to change the LUI sector from 5 to 6. The Association that I represent takes no position on granting more density for a particular project. We think that the Planning study should determine that. However, we are re aware that in the preliminary stages of the Planning study, it is very possible that the density of 6 would be granted if they wish to maintain �the residential character and suggest mixed use and the reason I bring this up is if you wish to keep those two blocks with some semblance of housing, the 25 percent that is required for a mixed use district is about...is a bonus amount of density or if you want to put it another way, it is a taxing of that property. if you want to have equal to your neighbor at the north in 'housing ... in offices, or to the south in offices and incidentally, I am in agreement that there is a tremendous amount of hQQsjng..,of offices but I don't think it's my position or anybody to tell somebody whether they should or should not build more offices in Dade County, that's a developer's OPtiQn but coming back to the point, the guys north of Bird and the guy south of Tigertail can put as many feet of office that they Wish and zero amount of housing, The two blQqk4 that We're talking 10 muqh 184 1965, items 5 4 6 Zoning soar-(4 10012 ab6Ut if we keep the toning Rd and they with to use tiXdd-use have to dbtd in with 25 Percent of their allowable ddhdit7 in housing, it you are familiar with what's been happening in Cdd6nut drove, PAttidularly in the tones that are very close to 27th Avenue, housing prices are a disaster along 27th and Bird, Some units have decreased in price and I will cite an example, right north of where this Yellowing is, Hank Green has two units which were originally put on the market at $139#000# Rank is willing fight now to tell both units for $80,000 a piece. That is a lowering from $135 per foot to $80 per foot. Whoever builds mixed use right now on those two blocks, Whoever's willing to do that, has to accept that on his portion of houting that he builds, he's either going to have rent them at a lots or he's going to have to sell them at a loss or wait till the market turns so I don't think we should get very confused in the difference between a 5 sector and 6 sector. if YOU Want to keep some hou8ingi the 6 sector is basically just granting the developer sufficient amount of the commercial space that he desires and obtaining for the city or for the residents, etc., that 25 percent residential that you Want to keep. The SPI-3 overlay is something that this Association is...wants to meet with the Planning Department. In keeping the buildings low and separating ourselves for a moment from density, ou force a person to build "x" amount of square feet similar to that north of him but at a lower height. You're pushing the buildings down. The SPI-3 does not make any sense, if both guys can build 40#000 sq. ft., for heaven sakes, let them go a little bit taller and separate themselves. You would avoid this problem with the proximity to residential if you take the SPI-3 out, You're building the same box but you're forcing that box to squat. You're also limiting the height of the parking structure to be 3 ft. above the sidewalk. We're -already having a lot of problems in Coconut Grove when we start digging and we go deep. I can mention some bad situations that have occurred because of the water table so if you want to obtain a good balance of parking, of height, etc., you have to permit the buildings to be taller. I would like to finish by saying that I believe the building starts the avenue in this portion that has yet to be developed towards what 27th Avenue should be. I take no position on the architecture, I think architecture is a matter of taste and I also believe that the property owners on 27th Avenue are quite capable on their own of developing their properties to meet the needs of Coconut Grove. Some of us have lived in Coconut Grove for many years. I have lived in Coconut Grove since 1960. I have been there for 25 years. I am very familiar with what architecture suits Coconut Grove. To tell you the truth, this building might or might not suit Coconut Grove but I'd like to see somebody show me what Coconut Grove architecture is all about because it's the biggest mish-mash that I've ever seen in my life. To summarize, I believe that we can no longer wait for the Planning Department and for other people to tell us what 27th Avenue is to become. We need to move. We have waited for manv years, some of us are very fearful that in this second state of interest bikes, etc., our projects, whatever could happen on 27th Avenue, will be severely hampered and delayed. Mr. Myers: Mr. Chairman, let me just briefly answer on behalf of the applicants some of the main objections that I heard. Number one, we're going to establish a domino effect, other people are going to come along and start asking for these projects. I don't agree that this opens any kind of a precedent whatsoever to a sector 6 or any other type of development. This is contract zoning; a Planned Unit Development - Mixed use has to be taken as they come, each Unit has to bep,,eaqh project has to be looked at individually and you have the sophistiqation and the independent judgement to make your decision as each project comes along. There is no precedent 11 March 18, 1965, items 5 FA 6 Zoning Board I 100 IS, established with each Manned unit development - "fixed Uge, it is a dOntraut with that particular developer to build a specific project. Now, number two, concerned about the number of variances and the 5XR and so forth, there are no variances requested in this piece except two and that is the increased Vkl, of course, to make the project economically feasible and to provide the residences that you need for the mixed use and the height. Those are the only two. The only two variances, everything else complies completely with the Planning Department, all setback requirements, all parking, we provide more than twice the parking required but...we provide 1 and 3/4 times the parking required, almost twice the parking required in the underground area and on the half level at the floor level, at the street level. The Coconut Grove Association and the T igertail Association, I'm sensitive to their interests but I respectfully submit that they are not the repository of all concerned and interested about how the Grove is going to be ultimately developed. I was born here. I've been here since 1933. I'm 52 years old, I hate to admit that. I went to Shenandoah Junior High and Miami High too, as Mr. Gott did and I've grown up in the Shenandoah area and in the Coconut Grove area. I live in Coconut Grove right now on Main Highway in Abitare. I live in the middle of all of this development and I am just as much concerned and interested in seeing how the Grove develops in the future as anybody and I would respectfully submit to these organizations and anyone else interested, the only way you're ever going to preserve residential development along 27th Avenue is to allow Planned Development - Mixed Use as this is, otherwise, you'll continue to have a hodge-podge, the ugliness and the lack of development that none of us want to see along this main arterial, thoroughfare, into the Grove. Mr. Gort: Okay, sir. Thank you. Mr. Whipple. Mr. Moran-R ibeaux: Mr. Gort? Mr. Whipple: Mr. Chairman, if I may, not to be argumentative but I think I'd like to clarify a couple of points which I think were misrepresented. In starting, I did not indicate the concern about the precedent which the attorney has just eluded to nor did I elude to the facade. I think both subjects have been addressed sufficiently in our written report and by the speakers here this evening. We share that concern about the facade and we have that concern about the precedent so I shan't speak anymore on that. At the onset of my comments this evening as I got into the project and the request, you may remember that I stated the Department was all for the Mixed Use - Planned Development concept. We have no problem with that. We have a problem in that when the attorney eluded to our study, Bayshore Study, about how we wanted a Mixed Use - Planned Development that he did not include the line that indicated that we specifically refer to the existing RG-2/5 district and was not talking about an increased intensity other than what the Planned Development would allow. The other comment was concerning the four floor area ratio. I don't know where that four comes from around a transit station. That's a mystical number to us. We agree: that there is an opportunity within walking distance, close proximity to a transit station there can in some areas, not all areas, provide an increased intensity and would be beneficial both to the community and to the rapid transit. Last point I'd like to make is that the term contract zoning has been used and I think that it's very inappropriate and I think there might even be a legal concern. The proper term is Planned Development associated with a change of zoning bring applied and the plans accompanying that change of zoning, I want to emphasize those plans attached, Those Plan$ that are before you this evening, hose plans that show only 11700 sq. ft, of s ground love i ground space, ground level spade t6r the residential occupants. That doesn't include the additional 5,000 that is one floor above the ground level but can you inmagne a residential development of number of units with only 1►700 sq. ft. of which you can put your feet on the sod and say, "ley, that's better living, that's a planned developtent." 1 think that lacks and I think what I'm really trying to do is emphasite that we have to live with these plans that are before you and what we're suggesting that these plans are not appropriate even though they're donceptual, they don't address the concerns of the facade, of the Livability sufficiently that this project should be approved. Mr. Gort: okay, Mr. Whipple. Thank you. We now close the public hearing. Any questions? Comments? Mr, Freixas: Mr. Chairman, I move that after consideration of the factors set forth in Section 3509 of ordinance 9500# 1 move that the request on agenda item 5 be recommended to the City Commission for approval. Mr. DeYurre: Second,, Mr. Gort: It's been moved and seconded. Is there any question? Read the motion. Mr. Perez-Lugones: Mr. Chairman, we have a motion on item number 5 which is to recommend approval to the City Commission of the change of zoning classification. The motion has been made by Mr. Freixas and seconded by Mr. DeYurre. Mr. Gort: Is there any discussion on the motion? Mr. Moran-R ibeaux: Well, how would I say if I have discussion on the motion, I would not have made that motion. I would have made the opposite one so there is no way I can discuss on that one. Mr. Gort: You can discuss it. Mr. Moran-Ribeaux: I am totally in disagreement with that motion and I think the fellow has failed to prove that what, he's doing is worth the merits. I think the Planning Department and the people here in the audience has convinced me that this project should not go. So, I mean, that's my only comment. I think that I might as well, you know, let people know how I feel about it for whatever it's worth. Mr. Gort: Any further discussion? .Ms. Basila: Well, my opinion is that I think it needs a little more work. I think it's a major project. I think it does set a precedent. I'd like to see it defarred and a little more work done on it with the Department and the developer. That's just my opinion. Mr. Gort; - Any further discussion? (Pause) Being none, call the question. Mr. Perez-Lugones; I'll call roll, Mr. Chairman. AYES: Mr. Gort, DaYurre, Freixas, Romero, Luaces and Channing NAYES: Ms, Basila Messrs. Sands and .Moran-Ribeaux ABSENT: None. 13 March 184 19e3, Items 5 & 6 Zoning SQard 6 (During Vote) Mr. dort: Since we're not making the final decision on this and this is just a recommendation to the City Commission and they'll need more approval for this, t'll tote "yes" . RESOLUTION ZB 47-85 AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN SECTION 3509 OF OR nINANCE 9500, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING BOARD ADOPTED RESOLUTION ZB 47-85 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL, OF THE CHANGE OF ZONING CLASSIFICATION IN THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS OF ZONING O.IDINANCE 9500, AS AMENDED, FROM RG-2/5 GENERAL RESIDENTIAL (WITH SPI-3 OVER TO RG-2/G GENERAL RESIDENTIAL (WITHOUT 8PI-3 OVE-gLAY) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 3151-3199 SW 27 AVENUE AND 2660 LINCOLN AVENUE AND 2699 TIGERTAIL AVENUE, ALSO DESCRIBED AS LOTS 1 THROUGH 6, BLOCK F, AMENDED PLAT OF NEW BISCAYNE (B-16) . Mr. Perez-Lugones: The motion to recommend approval carries 6 to 3. Mr. Gort: Item 6. Mr. Freixas: Mr. Chairman, after consideration of the factors set forth in Section 3509 of Ordinance 9500, I move that the request on agenda item 6 be recommended to the City Commission for approval. Mr. DeYurre: Second. Mr. Gort: It's been moved and seconded. Mr. Perez-Lugones: Mr. Chairman, we have a motion on item number 6 which is to recommend approval of the change of zoning to the City Commission. The motion has been made by yr. Freixas and seconded by Mr. DeYurre. I'll call roll. AYES: Mr. Gort, DeYurre, Freixas, Romero, Luaces and Channing NAYES: Ms. Basila Messrs. Sands and Moran-R ibeaux ASSENT: None. (During vote) Mr Gort: before, I vote "yes". 4 For the same reasons I stated 14 hatch 184 1905, It9ino 5 r .6 ZQninq Up4rd 100112 to 3. R88OLUTtON tg 48-85 AMA CONSIDERING not CACTORS SET FORT[ IN 8ECTjot4 3509 or ORDINANCE 9500, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING BOARD ADOPTED RESOLUTION Z8 48-85 jk ECoLklM8ND ING APPROVAL OF T88 C14AN68 OF ZONING CLASSIFICATION IN THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS OF zoNING ORDINANCE 9500, AS AMEN08t)o FROM P,(3-2/6 GENERAL atSI08NTIAL TO PD-MU PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - MIXED USE FOR Tat PROPERTY LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 3151-3199 SW 27 AVENUE AND 2660 LINCOLN AVENUE AND 2659 TIOERTAIL AVENUE, ALSO D88MtB8D AS LOTS I TRROUOR 6, BLOCK V, AMENDED PLAT OF NEW BISCAYNE (8-16), WITH APPROVAL OF T98 DEVELOPMENT PLANS ON FILE AND WITH THE VOLUNTARY DEDICATION OF THE WEST 20' OF LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 AND 6 PLUS A 25' RADIUS RETURNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF SW 27 AVENUE WITH LINCOLN AVENUE AND TIGERTAIL AVENUE. Mr. Perez-Lugones,. Motion on item number 6 carries 6 15 •�.!�'t�;r�,W',�E;'k�:'°; �;�i.{tfr,,�;M,+!'.�i�a"'r�'��s,`,•y:�:�•'���,x�.Pt��.�,1:rwra°tty�.�tywfaE4���w�.��+!t�I,• � i�ii�'v�kiu�:�+.t�drr`�r�Ylu�ti�+! V u c.:a Y„ �. ..�' ?- � � .�,� , .•" C•iw.!�i �T ��)x.I� � �r 1. •�t � f��TR'CTr"rL—•��''s;`�.:��i'f.tb.r1'�wq1:j}y".yi.�i�Y!W ��e.',.'�•'�� April 17, 1585 The Honorable Maurice Ferre and City of Miami Commissioners City of Miami 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, FL 33133 RE: Proposed Plan Development for 27th Avenue and Tiger Tail Avenue - Kenneth Meyer, Trustee Gentlemen: I would like to go on record as being in favor of the development for the block on 27th Avenue between Lincoln and Tiger Tail. I further believe that this particular development is a natural fit for the area and will compliment this major entrance to Coconut Grove. The assemblage of four separate parcels into one cohesive development will set a precedent for the orderly development of 27th Avenue, rather than having the area develop piece meal. Alpry truly your , WILL1,1114 T. JU_ �!F+.rc+��.t .c:yti.;' ��sk+lf��l.'�:Fr •,�i ����,��'t.. KOLISCH EA, 90 ALMI RIA AVENUE, CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134 DADE (305) 44-8600 • 9ROWARD (305) 920-3022 April 12th,1985 Ralph Ongie, Clerk City of Miami Mayor Maurice Ferre Commissioners Dear Sirs: I"would like to state my approval of the development proposed by Kenneth Myers, as Trustee, for the area on 27th Avenue, between Lincoln St. and Tigertail Avenue. As a 27th Avenue property owner; namely the plot known as 'Grove Mountain' and a Grove resident since 1968, I believe this mixed use project will enhance the 27th Avenue entrance into the 'Grove'. Further, the assemblance of 4 seperate parcels into one cohesive development will set a precedent for the orderly development of 27th Avenue, rather than having the area developed piecemeal. Sincerely, Bobette Kolisch ,� ; �, .1t�sFN.� . �s � �v�rtix.w eari�ir.#rNF��?6i1 .... • . .. , ........�+;?�lM� 4 . l!': 44Yi+llz`+iMu"„i�,'?nf:;v� 4104 Le Jeuma road . Coral Gables. Plorwda 33148 (30s)18S 1-93995 tit' es l ffldg April 15, 1785 Miami City Commission City Hall _ Pan American Drive.. Coconut Grove, Fla. 33133 Dear Commissioner: Joe Carollo Miller Dawkins Demetrio Perez J.L. Plummer and Mayor 21aurice Ferre ale verv, much.support the zoning request being made Thursday April 18, 13'85 at 5:90 P.11. For property at Tigertail and 27th Ave. The Economic Impact of the 27th Ave. corridor deserves consideration in terms of appropriate intensity levels for development. Certainly, we have been in Support of the re -zoning needs of the grove Gateway areas. If we are to serve the needs of the population and our Transit system...27th Ave is a priority of need. you for your consideration. fly. 1 W.O'. , esident yh4�"«t>ti"s.: lI:P,Ri'G•r4�'bw .. .... - + 1 ' PLAN►�.�,�,.� � •: `y0� '85 APR 18 A 810 Mr. Ralph Ongie City Clerk City of Miami City Hall 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, FL 33133 April lot , 1985 Re: Kenneth M. Myers as Trustee Proposed planned development for 27th Avenue and Tigertail Avenue Dear Mr. Ongie: I would like to be recorded as being in favor of the planned development on 27th Avenue between Lincoln Street and Tigertail Avenue. As a resident in the area, it is my feeling that the only hope for preserving some residential development in the 27th Avenue corridor is to allow a reasonable mix of commercial, office and residential use along 27th Avenue. I further believe that this development is particularly suited for the ` area and will compliment this major entrance to Coconut Grove. The assemblage of four separate parcels into one cohesive one will set a precedent for the orderly development of 27th Avenue, rather than having the area developed piecemeal. Sincerely yours, NAME „�,1;1., .. •::�'�'Y�+i31` `t�� .s r%1•+ . irl �•,'.g�4 3 Ut .�:C9441WT . !<<'�."r” '�.«iOWN : .. !�.�.'VJ2i1 .. ... - .. :.. r s ''.. '85 APR 18 A s 10 April 11, 1985 Mr. Ralph Ongie, City Clerk City of Miami 3500 Pan American Drive Dinner Key Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 RE: Kenneth M. Myers, Trustee The Proposed Planned Development for 27th Avenue and Tiger Tail Avenue Dear Mr. Ongiee I would like to be recorded as in favor of the planne. develop- ment for the property on 27th Avenue between Lincoln Street and Tiger Tail Avenue. As a property owner in the area, it is my feeling that the only hope for preserving some residential development in the 27th Avenue corridor is to allow a reasonable mixed development of commercial office and residential use along 27th Avenue. I further believe that this particular development is a natural fit for the area and will compliment this'major entrance to Coconut Grove. The assemblage of four separate parcels into one cohesive deve- lopment will set a precedent for the orderly development of 27th Avenue rather than having the area developed piecemeal. Very truly yours, 43/ Herschel V. Green HVG/kz 001 1 trp {.'.i'!k 1,4lttEi ,:... ...,i�.Jiik.,?,I{1►•t'r:air/t.11C'..r't1nN.Wliil.tHy.. ...t•. ... ... sli•xW'5oY1Mpi: Tr-�i�. �' .. :... . w.. .. -a i�IG �.. 1' .�Yi YY.-31fi';%F .� xy � i � �T•Y1.�M� 'Ab `85 APR 18 A 8 ►10 TO: Ralph bngie, Clerk City of Miami Mayor Maurice Ferre Commissioners RE., Kenneth M. Myers, as Trustee, proposed planned unit development for 27th Avenue and Tigertail Avenue I would like to be recorded as being in favor of the planned unit development for the block on 27th Avenue between Lincoln Street and Tigertail Avenue. As a property owner in the area, it is my feeling that the only hope for preserving some residential development in the 27th Avenue corridor is to allow a reasonable mixed development of commercial office and residential use along 27th Avenue. I further believe that this particular development is a natural fit for the area and will compliment this major entrance to Coconut Grove. Further, the assemblage of 4 separate parcels into one cohesive development will set a precedent for the orderly development of 27th Avenue, rather than having the area developed piecemeal. PUBLIC* F - I please All interested ts►ke notice that the f e ular, ptanrnng and Zoning Commission Meeting ; - Fl 9 April 25th will be Held on,,. previously;soheduled for AP cap Drives,• Thursday, April IS, 1985, at 9 9'clo�ck A.M. in the City ComMiSsion Chambers, 3500 Pan Amen_ Miami, Florida. AgLPH C, QNGIE , CITY CLERK CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIQA..t; !!! .,, ►sa? ' x ,. 1011 ;s v+�,)ria�ll�ees YY.trTi+ih:ltt�fall Ei 4P,4, A +.,4P .rc�s.�itaytow 41 !. sty yYtop '85 APR 18 A 8 :18 T0: Ralph Ongie, Clerk City of Miami Mayor Maurice Ferre Commissioners RE: Kenneth M. Myers, as Trustee, proposed planned unit development for 27th Avenue and Tigertail Avenue" I would like to be recorded as being in favor of the planned unit development for the block on 27th Avenue between Lincoln Street and Tigertail Avenue. As a property owner in the area, it is my feeling that the only hope ■` for preserving some residential development in the 27th Avenue corridor is to allow a reasonable mixed development of commercial office and residential use along 27th Avenue. I further believe that this particular development is a natural fit for the area and will compliment this major entrance to Coconut Grove. Further, the assemblage of 4 separate parcels into one cohesive development will . set a precedent for the orderly development of 27th Avenue, rather than having the area developed piecemeal. FFIorida, 7C(THE PUBLIC' F ted persons please take notice that the lanning and Zoning Commissi be hdMeetion.scheduled forApril 25th willA rd 18, t9$5, at 9 O'clock A.M.In the Cit�t 'Pion Chambers.3500 Pan American Driveorida RAhPH O, pNGIE t CITY CLERK -CITY OF-MIAMI, FLORIDA q-. .!! le . n ra .Y7i�'it�i:r,�f'1�?►ida�ti�i'1".i'�14j;`y�iY.c �;p�`�,��"�u[r�de��.'+�'.�g,:t i�ys:�.�.1rr,��1.F:u's:.t�yrl`�Ey�.tP1��W1'i.��.°?1���'{,�"ti`,`Y�'��'� .'�Yil!�I�iMI? •+�k�.,*�'�r'a�`Z'.`.-`i<<'1,"".',`�.�• i.i')..�,.�4r.'�,t��:`'�r=`�+;�A,;iii.!:t•Ly'1'J'fl�it!Qa'iit,�'.?►'.N.. .. . n' Sharon Allen Realty, hw* TO.,Ralph Ongie, Clerk City of Miami '85 APR 18 A a 10 Mayor Maurice Ferre Commissioners RE: Kenneth M. Myers, as Trustee, proposed planned unit development for 27th Avenue and Tigertail Avenue — I would like to be recorded as being in favor of the planned unit development for the block on 27th Avenue between Lincoln Street and Tigertail Avenue. As a property owner in the area, it is my feeling that the only hope for preserving some residential development in the 27th Avenue corredor is to allow a reasonable mixed development of commercial office and residential use along 27th Avenue. I further believe that this particular development is a natural fit for the area and will compliment this major entrance to Coconut Grove. Further, the assemblage of 4 separate parcels into one cohesive development will set a precedent for the orderly development of 27th Avenue, rather than having the area developed piecemeal. , SHA N ALLEN 7HE PUBLIC'. All interested persons please take notice that the Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting be held OR previously dcheduled foApril 25 � th ill nthe City�' Thursday, April 18,9Q Commission Chambers, 3500 Pan American Orlvei,. l Miami, Florida, RALPH G, ON .,°'; , f CITY CLERK • CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA ol t" a 100 Ri rP ArhPAt. QJ1i tc $1 9 f�n.�...,......4 !� n. a •sh _!i+'ti',1>+„tit.:d:. ri:nk#;;,-r.�k�t3��.t�t�I3t.ix�wwi.,.,sa'.nisi.,-sra'�?!>i,x'a�:r}ual►�i�.+�Cs�',�'..��i'�!F�!ht�,t.w�':.�'��tL:�;.i e�ij•�iy�;�y \1 .�-4 �.0 /i:� +a{.Nwt,XV' hlyhi,+'pc�.ars' ';h'�,, •'••'t.'. v3• s '�•�N� ..v:�:' !.:.b A• t t w�'�,,,�r-"�t,,y�s.`t�i'.�';�;i�1;'��Y':!'J!' YWc n�. �� �' ti rJ(+t �+, � .. v a"y..�crxiir`2''�5.'t'�• .� .. , . ,t:'�Sida.. Illy h, • '(' jGJJ •10 GENCY April 14t 1985 The City of Miami Dinner Key Miami, FL 33133 Reference: The Kenneth Meyers development proposal for corner of 27th and Tigertail Avenues. As a co-owner of commercial property at 28S7 S. W. 27th Avenue, I would like to express my approval of the projected plans for development at 27th and Tigertail Avenues as put forth by Mr. Kenneth Meyers and group. %P ed hi De Piue, President IRSTEN TRAVEL AGENCY ' Ng; W"444� f / TAIL. fR9F i 99#X Jn ,FV:14011;T-4144 / 1 5 :4" / M miDf.RIOF A f MIAAA.:FL �� a �� AA +� 10' 0 i .tc�b!!t�,-�•'.�, i•.�`�°.�1+.-�+,�,�!•' ";t�oi1`tiZe�'�P.�`:�;+%M�i`�x. .. Y4e$►Y'!�;�:1`i�iii1�'"� �`� , �. fit .+�kt r f . �..•1�.:::1115. c .. ,1�FirtlSt`.'j1j�.i� Vj.•a) i �� -''1i,•G sp TT'*K' t +• R ;1�� ft"W"WON, oleo PLANNAi, f ... -IbS .. ..• -�iYfC '85 APR 18 A 8 :10 TO: Ralph Ongie, Clerk City of Miami Mayor Maurice Ferre Commissioners RE: Kenneth M. Myers, as Trustee, proposed planned unit development for 27th Avenue and Tigertail Avenue I would like to be recorded as being in favor of the planned unit development for the block on 27th Avenue between Lincoln Street and Tigertail Avenue. As a property owner in the area, it is my feeling that the only hope for preserving some residential development in the 27th Avenue corredor is to allow a reasonable mixed development of commercial office and residential use along 27th Avenue. I further believe that this particular development is a natural fit for the area and will compliment this major entrance to Coconut Grove. Further, the assemblage of 4 separate parcels into one cohesive development will set a precedent for the orderly development of 27th Avenue, rather than having the area developed piecemeal. De) 12- j 156 C0 G 2 d 7 SIT. r THE PUBLIU1 F All interested persons please take notice that the s. id zoning Commission Meetin9 Regular Planning a previously .schedl g$5ra April of k A.M. in the C'iW 'Thursday, April 18, } Commission Chambers, 35�0 Pan Amerman OriYeM,. L RALPH O, ONOIE s;t � Miami, Florida, CITY CLERK CITY OF MIAMII, FLORIDA;.,; �! o c� {,IC r s AN&L 41 WVtOW PUNKIN;: Bonnie Coyle Dosign,,c U.0 APR 18 A8 10 April 16, 1985 Mr. Ralph Ongie City Clerk, City of Miami Mayor Maurice Ferre Commissioners City Hall 3500 Pan American Drive Dinner Key Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 RE: Kenneth M. Myers, as Trustee, Proposed planned development for 27th Avenue Tigertail Avenue Dear Sirs, Please accept this letter as my approval and recanmendation to the Commission, as a property owner, of the proposed development for the block on 27th Avenue between Lincoln Street and Tigertail Avenue. I Futhermore, I beleive the mixed developTent"of the proposed project will unify the progression of commercial/residential use on 27th Avenue. As the major thoroughfare to Coconut Grove, it is imperative that 27th Avenue be developed in an orderly fashion or it will be a disaster. This project will contribute both aesthetic beauty and a positive direction for the proper growth of Coconut Grove. ;$J erely, Bormie Coyle BC/sCJ COCOWC Growth AWOO 33133 00, ,:,y,�y�.'��"+� %kf?.?l,tb,iiiaul Yki',� E:/r±,icl�k�.�kSM_;Mymft��4�J k/►TNr.;'P��#�i�.. � j.+� i►�s�u ���.i�'if1��1 �+�►i�'� i3��►��i�,�t�fi e'!►9tr�:i �r'➢;�... .... , ... . z+. ���" ' • J PLAr!%N April 15th, 1985 To: Ralph Ongie, Clerk City of Miami Mayor Maurice Ferre Commissioners RE: Kenneth M. Myers, as Trustee, Proposed Planned Unit Development for 27th Avenue and Tigertail Avenue 1 would like to be recorded as being in favor of the planned unit development for the block on 27th Avenue between Lincoln Street and Tigertail Avenue. As a property owner in the area on 27th Avenue, it is my feeling that due to demand and economics, that the 27th Avenue corredor be developed with unity and the style to both secure the business and residential needs of the community, but also serve as a more appealing entrance to one of the most exciting areas of Miami - Coconut Grove. in�erelfi V'rtfcent J. lastore General Sad s Manager VJP/rse NE10100141001) RESIDENTIAL SPECIALISTS SINCE 19" :14#14 MAIN .HJOHWAV VO( I)NOT c;ltOV84 FLORIDA 4 (4151448:41ZI t M ie 1 „t.'t,�+.,. � al!W4iu3tYr ti!4x�rt�+sV��,ri,y�N,�4��1,'.i'ti': �: ,+�:x�, $••gti�:�'Y'�f:�:w�r lf�"�.`� ��v��±,t��� *'3"f�';�"�:�._ �k.. ���ic�Fi���� r A• �. ' l '!M'Vi�� �T' �1.2 I.�1�,�jl ��iV471Il _w xwl" . ku"f-t+ bA,.. � ..r4?fi S A C K. \ iX N AS.10 MEMO APRIL 1S, 1985 TO: RALPH ONGIE, CITY CLERK, CITY OF MIAMI MAYOR MAURICE FERRE CITY COMISSIONERS RE: KENNETH M. MYERS, AS TRUSTEE, PROPOSED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOPI THE CORNER OF 27 AVENUE 8 TIGERTAIL I BEING A PROPERTY OWNER @ 2869 8 @ 2912 S.W. 27 AVENUE WOULD LIKE TO GO ON RECORD AS BEING IN FAVOR OF THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED FOR THE BLOCK ON 27TH AVENUE. BETWEEN-LINCOLN STREET 8 TIGERTAIL AVENUE. IT IS MY FIRM BELIEF THAT THIS TYPE OF PROJECT IS WELL SUITED FOR A MAJOR STREET SUCH AS 27TH AVENUE. I FEEL THE ASSEMBLAGE OF SMALL PARCELS INTO LARGER MORE COHESIVE DEVELOPMENTS WILL SET A TREND FOR THE ORDERLY ARCHITECTURAL DEVELOPMENT OF 27TH AVENUE, 8 IN THE LONG RUN BE GOOD FOR COCONUT GROVE S INCOURAGE THE USE OF THE METRORAIL STATION @ 27TH AVENUE 8 Q.S.1 SINCERELY, GAIL B. BALDWIN ..t.��:+;:a;.:'a�t�gi�rrmlk,;At!ew+�an,.y�. a�i�.:craw`�'!.yf,�+•.;�i��'�.+�.�!��'!W�f�'lt` rig; p�wtrr�rr,,+�!j��},:i��.,4>ttd�;�•i�►�Fc�Ab�"•s��� �i',�;t f�`„���,.. ��+`�.`'a ti.•4,a;�,`r�'E'+a:�':r. r22ti'•"tr':..i•i�.V�ii,,,.,�:. .,�r�l���. 685 APR 18 A 8.10 T0: Ralph Ongie, Clerk City of Miami Mayor Maurice Fevre Commissioners RE: Kenneth M. Myers, as Trustee, proposed planned unit development for 27th Avenue and Tigertail Avenue I would like to be recorded as being in favor of the planned unit development for the block on 27th Avenue between Lincoln Street and Tigertail Avenue. As a property owner in the area, it is my feeling that the only hope for preserving some residential development in the 27th Avenue corredor is to allow a reasonable mixed development of commercial office and residential use along 27th Avenue. I further believe that this particular development is a natural fit for the area and will compliment this major entrance to Coconut Grove. Further, the assemblage of 4 separate parcels into one cohesive development will set a precedent for the orderly development of 27th Avenue, rather than having the area developed piecemeal. SCE ig 7HE pUBLIC' 0 All Interested persons Please take notice that the a Reg ular Planning and Zoning Commissloh Meeting, previojjsly . scheduled for April 25tt k A.M. in the City Thursday, 40118, 19", at 9 Commission Cfiamber ', 3500 Pan American Orlve` r. / MI a 1, Florida, RALPH G. ONOIE CITY CLERK s CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIpAfF�� ;! ,s ���`•f'W ��.�.'.`?'it-.K•�+W,y-a�MaY�a�Su:�:s�l.u.i�lWY;�"1�b.`45..: e1... �. a����. ,. `wi+l+,'Fi': a'�i iY:a,•'�riu:3tY:lrii�•2�1t'�.Est.�:!��:.+"•i'r,�Mf:'�?�41 f+ . ie! '� '!f� '+►+arullvb•' ... �` :�•'�<•!''<`,a. �•,Y.c , .;LW:W. .ttaF•;W,7�,ta :•�'�./', �'y'e.: `. tic •�'+i? �ica:.�i L'+ �Z awsfrFW�'��7C`+�»':?'�•!�•°'a�.{�.; •'tip wo.._ .��!! . �: �... ..:+"�" Mom. • t. 'E!4' S ;•�' •:: i':;• 'J"?. +':;s"�.,i1�,� to ;I— PI;CMMONAL 7359rWoMy Poad MANACEMLNT.INC• Suite 300 Miami, Flo • 173 '6 APR A 8.10 ) 271 April 15, 1985 Ralph Ongie, City Clerk, City of Miami Mayor Maurice Ferre Commissioners 3500 Pan American Drive City Hall Dinner Key Coconut Grove, Fla Re: Kenneth M. Myers, as Trustee, proposed Planned Development for 27th Avenue and Tigertail Avenue I would like to be recorded as being in favor of the planned development for the block on 27th Avenue between Lincoln Street and Tigertail Avenue. As a property owner in the area, it is my feeling that the only hope for preserving some residential development in the 27th Avenue corredor is to allow a reasonable mixed development of commercial office and residential use along 27th Avenue. I further believe that this particular development is a natural fit for the area and will compliment this major, entrance to Coconut Grove. The assemblage of 4 seperate parcels into one cohesive development will set a precedent for the orderly development of 27th Avenue, rather than having the area,developed piecemeal. Sincerely, � I -itchell ' x� ,��,: 4i.♦ �`...,r ,. v ,tA• ' " f:.. ;+►„?I:�k`�;�e�'',s #' �,P�t:�Ik�:•iv'• �v ,.4.�ys1g(�il�""�tc"�.�rrr: ��Y+r...'�.. �.• 'y�•...21'ix�t' at�/'•'0� .tt� �c, r ,v. , t,, y� • � ix �;�; 3 a�'�c18F,.... '`V�11�`�IY3+Y�It ';�,'+'�x+� M �. tt' c, t'!�!1�;_�uj.c(�;'}•.'!/Y;!t/��t.vli?q�r".•i1i:7N!`^•`,'#1.t`•�,+.;s<w'. v v - •'t�.'`,ir,!•#4i+itl•# :`act s`i APR 18 A8.1b Suite FOUR MIAMI. PLt]RICA 33t33 f31751 442.99 J7 WALTER A. MGBLCY ALAN BALE MOOLI6y 17 April 1985 Honorable Mayor Maurice Ferre and City Commissioners C/O City Clerk, Ralph Ongie RE: Kenneth M. Myers, as Trustee, Lots 1-6, Blk. F, Amd. Plat of New Biscayne Mayor Ferre and Commissioners: We the undersigned, as owners of lot 2, of the application, and other properties in the immediate vicinity; urge your consideration and approval of the request.In consideration of this matter please be advised the following: 1. The existing rental units on the property are all in excess of 30 years old; 8 units are C.B.S., 2 are wood frame, and one is barely habitable. 2. The properties are paying an ad valorem real estate tax, based on an assessment in excess of $25./ sq. ft. (One million dollars/acre). 3. Coconut Grove and Miami have undergone a radical evolution since these properties were originally developed, and no one could have foreseen the many positive changes which have occurred in our area. 4. The proposed development will replace these ten substandard, cramped units, with twenty-four modern, urban apartments; located contiguous with the existing condominii}m. and removed from the ever increasing traffic and noise of the maim North -South arterial road in Coconut Grove (S.W. 27th Avenue). In'conalusonp your approval of this application, which the City's Zoning Board has already recommended by a 6-3 vote; will enable, a rational and guaranteed redevelopment of this valuable and highly visible. corner of Coconut Grove, The new development will add twenty-four new and much needed residential unit, combinod with the commercial spate; will hopefully set a standard and precedent for a long overdue rejuvenation of the Gateway to the Grove. i �e�Pettfu7l•y su�mittitd '' 0_0ie 3 •.�itvi�:'+!'Ifl�l�'ltl".+R�9!wu�;'i�!t'�{�}r.r;�r+.•iW�,ier,eAlYYt,y!'t.••yy.,+,++tffi�j�:`'.ar�+!�i�1�R11Ay�Ytt�1N�!!it iE�+.t�+tm'iy,�;t•�+�:y'j�r°;iy�,4`: s. ••m 1 Wif�4�:1A+�sac,�«"�%!' �.i•..i.'?e'.tw r�W • ya,.ayap-A+r+orA►• �{Vj 1 b VILLAGE GATE, LTD. 30 Alhambra Circle s� i! T}1 YIP11t1 'p, (30) •4�47.0880 :k1 S. Lr�HIDA ;331,41 TO: Ralph Ongin, Clerk City of Miami )�--vur Maurice Ferre Co,;..aissioncrs RE: Kenneth H. Myers, as Trustee, proposed planned unit development for '7%h Avenue and Ticertail Avenue I wauld liketo be recorded as being in favor of the planned unit development for the block on 27th Avenue between Lincoln Street and Tigertail Avenue. As a property owner in the area, it is my feeling that the only hope for preserv:n; some resident: ' developmenL in the 27th Avenue corr;dor is to ` allow a reasonable mixed de,-e::�pmsnt of commercial office and residential use along 27th Avenue. I further believe that this particular development is a nsturul fit for the area and will compliment this major entrance to Coconut Grove. ructhar, Uia usseuibla-a of 4 separate parcels into one cohesive development will set a precedent for the orderly development of 27th Avenue, rather than having the area developed piecemeal. GROVE VILLAGE GATE LTD. CORAL GABLES CAPITAL MANAGEMENT CO- ,INC-General Partner By: ,..,- R be J. Z 10 , Pres d Or 10 0 1 •.N.'.::".4 a. a•.'•.�"ry:,�w+�;..�'z!f�r.'i'i���t�lF�.wfi�y�,•,ay_,.s>;t,�x.., fy�..r ��/i`r �a etc <sY:pp�+WiiFi�M�+Pi.1i�- ��.Il�+r�•c �y.�i.:.:n �, Il�"•�ioiiPllR�� - I- -- f APR 18 A 8 10' To Ralph Ongie, Clerk City of Miami Mayor Maurice Ferre Commissioners — EtE., Kenneth M. Myers, as Trustee, proposed planned unit development for 27th Avenue and Tigertail Avenue I would like to be recorded as being in favor of the planned unit development for the block on 27th Avenue between Lincoln Street and Tigertail Avenue. As a property owner in the area, it is my feeling that the only hope for preserving some residential development in the 27th Avenue corredor is to allow a reasonable mixed development of commercial office and residential use along 27th Avenue. I further believe that this particular development is a natural fit for the area and will compliment this major entrance to Coconut Grove. Further, the assemblage of 4 separate parcels into one cohesive development will set a precedent for the orderly development of 27th Avenue, rather than having the area developed piecemeal. I' 6 Y THE PUBLIC F All interested persons Please take notice that the Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting • s previously' scheduled for April 25th will be held on 'Thursday. April 1$, 1985, at 9 O'clock A.M: in the City. Commission Chambers, 350o Pan American Drive:.. Miami. Florida. SALPH G. ONGIE ''';% S CITY CLERK i CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA� �. e r. 1001 i ►' y ,=ie.,rr.:Y. :os = + +�m9Mi art:iAi a Sfi'ks *+tiriw„ �'.i. as., .► :' 4 3ae'�*''� `�!?w; `+ti!';+C.Wa+?�wt �' st,:;4 4WJ..V140VA ... r .t:�. � z .,, .=w, k:f� af+ � „1.�,�.�••• t Mi'!�t'µ9.t�j' �'�.1'•?,'{`�.'!NfW.�it ii �.. ,;: r.`.a..YF�., �.f ��•: „ i��'u: e�iS�i{'.�w�',C{�1�'i �iti..'.�^r�... 4'f .. ..�'yl �. ,. • ... C! Mr. Ralph Ongie City Clerk City of Miami City Hall 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, FL 33133 PLAW111 '85 APR 18 A 810 April , 1985 Re: Kenneth M. Myers as Trustee Proposed planned development for 27th Avenue and Tigertail Avenue Dear Mr. Ongie: I would like to be recorded as being in favor of the planned development on 27th Avenue between Lincoln Street and Tigertail Avenue. As a property owner in the area, it is my feeling that the only hope for preserving some residential development in the 27th Avenue corridor is to allow a reasonable mix of commercial, office and residential use along 27th Avenue. I further believe that this development is particularly suited for the area and will compliment this major entrance to Coconut Grove. The assemblage of four separate parcels into one cohesive one will set a precedent for the orderly development of 27th Avenue, rather than having the area developed piecemeal. Sincerely yours, NAM ';�'yl>�•.,,.., .q.'.�.j;y>•:{'.�.=�y1�d•r�'r?M9i�.s�tii',�'4:1t^f�a:tk.st:��„�.�,•, 1.�sr • riW•.:�!+si•tt.�}5Ip`.'J'es,fiY, iM4�i;�i•�'ti?:i,►lO�ytlt,t.i�,+�ui1�:}� .s+�R1iY�a�,'�1�Jyi••+'y1,i.�.j�4,�if;.I v:�q%Iµ: i; ��it ..;1�:!�:'�y4N4ct+.l; �;✓'t.t+.�•'... �1:. :4':r�'}.i''; ?•:f �♦F�1'e�:.'��r"�:t�i'���:�II���'•��"T•:!�»c�`•':YI��.f`./iai`1�.i.��r:�a�` '1 '85 APR 18 A 8 :11 April G7 , 1985 Mr. Ralph Ongie City Clerk City of Miami City Hall 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, FL 33133 Re: Kenneth M. Myers as Trustee Proposed planned development for 27th Avenue and Tigertail Avenue Dear Mr. Ongie I would like to be recorded as being in favor of the planned development on 27th Avenue between Lincoln Street and Tigertail Avenue. As a property owner in the area, it is my feeling that the only hope for preserving some residential development in the 27th Avenue - corridor is to allow a reasonable mix of commercial, office and residential use along 27th Avenue I further believe that this development is particularly suited, for the area and will compliment this major entrance to Coconut Grove The assemblage of four separate parcels into one cohesive one will set a precedent for the orderly development of 27th Avenue, rather than having the area developed piecemeal. Sincerely yours, NAME DlFBS t UN s.a r i iYlti tY t�..�xt.+l.�4k.:' ?'f� Yd i! _.tvtAiYAi��ZEfxW! !a ' fir t•. x . .� '.li;x, .5e . � .tit . -''iF° Px�• �'�•• . i'��.w . �. d�x�E�'�; 'L w, t - � .. • .s A 's��r' a.�"a•r•r��S.• w+�'�w1:.31'•�+id1•ip±f!W'tfNf!''J�f`rr'y'�:'M:.+•;,v...N:yli+i�q[►cwf-.r�,�e�i:v.`!',�;�x .:,y,�w,w.. our t;�r,!*�,�.. •a7;.; i 's. �LA�INiNi. '85 APR 1$ A 8 :11 April , 1985 Mr. Ralph Ongie City Clerk City of Miami City Hall 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, FL 33133 Re: Kenneth M. Myers as Trustee Proposed planned development for 27th Avenue and Tigertail Avenue Dear Mr. Ongi.e: I would like to be recorded as being in favor of the planned development on 27th Avenue between Lincoln Street and Tigertail Avenue. _ As a property owner in the area, it is my feeling that the only hope for preserving some residential development in the 27th Avenue corridor is to allow a reasonable mix of commercial, office and residential use along 27th Avenue. I further believe that this development is particularly suited for the area and will compliment this major entrance to Coconut Grove, The assemblage of four separate parcels into one cohesive one will set a precedent for the orderly development of 27th Avenue, rather than having the area developed piecemeal. Sincerely yours, NA 41 1 007 NOTICE TO THE Pb• ni"� A All fntuestsd persons please take notice that the i guisi' Ptanning and Zoning Commission Meeting previously scheduled tar April 26th will be hold an. • thursdsiy, April 'Ig, 086, at 0 O`CIOCk A.M.in the City Commission Chambers. 3600 Pan American Drive, C MlslTtl, Florida, AALPW 0. CNGIP 5 CITY OF MIAMI. FLOAIDA • fi r TO: Ralph Ongie, Clerk City of Miami Mayor 'Maurice Ferre Commissioners RE; Kenneth M. Myers, as Trustee, proposed planned unit development for 27th Avenue and Tigertail_Avenue I would like to be recorded as being in favor of the planned unit development for the block on 27th Avenue between Lincoln Street and Tigertail Avenue. As a property owner in the area, it is my feeling that the only hope for preserving some residential development in the 27th Avenue corredor is to allow a reasonable mixed development of commercial office and residential use along 27th Avenue. I further believe that this particular development is a natural fit for the area and will compliment this major entrance to Coconut Grove. Further, the assemblage of 4 separate parcels into one cohesive development will set a precedent for the orderly development of 27th Avenue, rather than having the area developed piecemeal. w , G4 ,�,C�:� v , /j 0 10 0 NOTICE TO "TH All lnterelted pi OOMS pleaja- aagrigiaA AMI the m4uiar Planning and Zoning COnrw119§1011 Meeting reviously actioidulad tot April 251h will be held On Y hurgday, April 18, 1996, at 0 O'clock AN, In tho City Cammiskion Chambers, 3900 Pon Arneritan Drive. Mlaft Florida, AALPH 0CITY I K F NGI S CITY OF. MIAMI, FLOAIDA . b i TO: Ralph Ongie, Clerk City of Miami Mayor Maurice Ferre Commissioners RE: Kenneth M. Myers, as Trustee, proposed planned unit development for 27th Avenue and Tigertail Avenue I would like to be recorded as being in favor of the planned unit development for the block on 27th Avenue between Lincoln Street and Tigertail Avenue. As a property owner in the area, it is my feeling that the only hope for preserving some residential development in the 27th Avenue corredor is to allow a reasonable mixed development of commercial office and residential use along 27th Avenue. I further believe that this particular development is a natural fit for the area and will compliment this major entrance to Coconut Grove. I pi the assemblage of 4 separate parcels into one cohesive development will set a precedent for the orderly development of 27th Avenue, rather than having the area developed piecemeal. V rc eke -L:J' 2, 1, a 6L - G/ ��ti� yt. NOTICE TO THI-10 Ail lnti�ri��t�d pdrsdns pl�ass falt+�'ti t I Ul�lr Pl�rinii and aping Commi"I"n ► 8 Al j previously scheduled for April 25th will be hold on, 1hursday, April 18, 1086, at 9 O'dlodk A.M. In the City . Commission Chambers, 3600 Pin American drive, Miami, Florida. RALPH 0. ONGIV CITY CL SA CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA in 7 TO: Ralph Ongie, Clerk City of Miami Mayor Maurice Ferre Commissioners RR: Kenneth M. Myers, as Trustee$ proposed planned unit development for 27th Avenue and Tigertail Avenue I would like to be recorded as being in favor of the planned unit development for the block on 27th Avenue between Lincoln Street and Tigertail Avenue. As a property owner in the area, it is my feeling that the only hope for preserving some residential development in the 27th Avenue corredor is to allow a reasonable mixed development of commercial office and residential use along 27th Avenue. I further believe that this particular development is a natural fit for the area and will compliment this major entrance to Coconut Grove. he assemblage of 4 separate parcels into one cohesive development Will set a precedent for the orderly development of 27th Avenue, rather than having the area developed piecemeal. 0 11 MIAMI REVIEW AND DAILY RECORD Published Daily except Saturday. Sunday and Legal Holidays Miami, Dade County, Florida. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF DADE: Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Sookle Williams, who on oath says that she is the Vice President of Legal Advertising of the Miami Review and Daily Record, a daily (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) newspaper, published at Miami in Dade County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a Legal Advertisement of Notice In the matter of CITY Or MIA11I Re: ORDINANCE NO. 10012 In the ...... X . X . X ........................... Court, was published in said newspaper In the issues of June 19, 1985 Affiant further says that the said Miami Review and Daily Record Is a newspaper published at Miami in said Dade County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Dade County, Florida, each day (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Miami in said Dace County, Florida. for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertise= and afftant further says that she has neither paid nor m ad any person, firm or corporation any discount. rebatef/9"', asion orrefund for the purpose of securing this advenfor publication In the said newspaper. A // - .tt1V11f'/zj �.e.% Io and subscribed*befor9 me this • 85 19th . day of ... I=. � . e r.. � ... D. t9, .... . A. . 6 at .,..a Kota Pu I) �S A of, I jdi'at Large (SEAL) My Commission expirek4uihre�IC��J',,. I , //,, iIlftYlitiL.` 61TV 6P MiAMIt DADS iCOUNM FL ONIDA LIKOAL NOV'IC€ All Irlteeeated persons will take notice that on the 13th day of JUhe, 1865, the City Cofl,MIS910n of Miami, Florida adopted the toilovulhg titled ordihance(s): ORDINANCE NO. 10002 AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CObE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORMA, by REPEALING ARTICLE IV, ENTITLED "PENSION AND RETIREMENT PLANS, OF CHAPTER 40, ENTITLED "PERSONNEL," OF THE CODE OF THE City OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, BY REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 2230, AS AMENDBD, WHICH PROVIDED FOR A PROGRAM OF RETIREMENT ALLOWANCES AND DEATH BENEFITS ON BEHALF OF CERTAIN EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OP MIAMI, SAID PROGRAM BEING ENTITLED "MIAMI CITY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM"; CRE- ATED A RETIREMENT BOARD TO MANAGE AND OPERATE THE SYSTEM; PROVIDED ITS POWERS, DUTIES, AND FUNC- TIONS; PROVIDED FOR A TRUSTEE; AND SET FORTH THB PLAN OF FINANCING THE SYSTEM•, AND BY REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 5624, AS AMENDED, WHICH PROVIDED FOR A RETIREMENT PLAN ENTITLED "MIAMI CITY GEN- ERAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN," TO PROVIDE CER- TAIN RETIREMENT ALLOWANCES AND DEATH BENEFITS ON ACCOUNT OF GENERAL EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, OTHER THAN POLICE OFFICERS AND FIRE FIGHTERS; CREATED A RETIREMENT BOARD TO MAN-. AGE AND OPERATE THE PLAN; PROVIDED FOR ITS POW- ERS, DUTIES AND FUNCTIONS; PROVIDED FOR A -TRUS- TEE; AND SET FORTH A PLAN OF FINANCING SAID PLAN; SUBSTITUTING THEREFOR A NEW ARTICLE IV, ENTITLED "PENSION AND RETIREMENT PLANS," WHICH ESTABLISHES THE "CITY OF MIAMI FIRE FIGHTERS' AND POLICE OFFI- CERS' RETIREMENT TRUST" AND THE "CITY OF MIAMI . GENERAL EMPLOYEES' AND SANITATION" EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT TRUST'; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVI- SION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ORDINANCE NO. 10003 AN ORDINANCE SETTING FORTH A PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT, KNOWN AS "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. 1 ", TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE ELECTORATE AT A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION ON AUGUST 13, 1985, SAID AMEND- MENT OF THE CITY CHARTER TO PROVIDE FOR THE CREA- TION OF AN EXECUTIVE MAYOR FORM OF GOVERNMENT FOR THE CITY OF MIAMI AND DEFINING QUALIFICATIONS, FUNCTIONS AND COMPENSATION OF THE MAYOR, COM- MISSION, CHAIRMAN OF THE COMMISSION;' DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE AND BUDGI- ET, AND CITY ATTORNEY; PROVIDING FOR THE TERMS OF OFFICE AND ELECTION DATES FOR FIVE COMMISSION- ERS AND THE MAYOR;DEFINING THE CLASSIFIED AND UNCLASSIFIED CIVIL SERVICE; SETTING TERMS AND CON- DITIONS OF OFFICE FOR THE CITY ATTORNEY AND CITY CLERK; REPEALING ALL CHARTER SECTIONS OR PARTS THEREOF IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR SUCH CHAR- TER AMENDMENT TO TAKE EFFECT UPON PASSAGE BY THE ELECTORATE; CONTAINING A REPEALER AND A SEV. ERABILITY CLAUSE. ORDINANCE NO. 10004 AN ORDINANCE SETTING FORTH A PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT, KNOWN AS "CHAPTER AMENDMENT. NO. 2," TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE ELECTORATE AT A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION ON AUGUST 13, 1985, SAID AMEND- MENT OF THE CITY CHARTER TO PROVIDE FOR THE HOLD-' ING OF PARTISAN ELECTIONS FOR THE OFFICE OF MAYOR IF.THE PROPOSED.EXECUTIVE MAYOR CHARTER AMEND- MENT KNOWN AS CHARTER AMENDMENT NO, 1.'SCHED ULED FOR REFERENDUM ON AUGUST 13,1985 BECOMES:, EFFECTIVE, SAID PARTISAN ELECTIONSTO COMMENCE' NOVEMBER 561905; SETTING FORTH PROCEDURES FOR'; NOMINATION OF PANDIDATES; PROVIDING FOR A FIF115T , AND SECOND PRIMARY NOMINATION ELECTION, PROVID AND REPEALER t�I A�SE,c ORPINANC A MR 119 ORr)N1 i AN EMERGENCY WOINANOt ftlAhL44 MCIAL R"tVENUE FUNbB ENtITLtb': "C INtERGOV0NMENtAL LIA196N (P` '85)" AI Job DEVELOPMtNt PAONAM (PY,"86)" At ING FUNDS P60 THEIR t� tWfbN IN THE A� 166,060 AND $683,t56 RE813ECtIVELY FROM T STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, AND AUtHO' Ij CITY MANAGER to ACCEPT,t4 GRANT AWA THE UNITED StAttS DEPARTMENT OF LABt ENTER INTO THE NECESSARY CONTRACT( AGAttMENt(S) WITH THE SOUTH FLORIDA EM AND TRAINING CONSORTIUM t0 ACCEPT TH CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A iTY CLAUSE. ORDINANCE NO, 10007 AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2 AND 6 OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 0901, ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 21,1984. THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS ORDINANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 80, 1985, AS AMENDED 13Y INCREASING THE APPROPRIATIONS IN THE SPECIAL REVENUE FUND, SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICE IN THE AMOUNT OF $53,500 FOR THE PURPOSE OF OPERATIONAL EXPENSES, REVENUE IN A LIKE AMOUNT IS AVAILABLE FROM THE MIAMI SPORTS AND EXHIBITION AUTHORITY IN THE AMOUNT OF $8,900 AND FROM DEVELOPER'S BID DEPOSIT IN THE AMOUNT OF $45,000; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. ORDINANCE NO. 10008 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 4 AND 6 OF ORDI- NANCE NO, 9901 ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 21, 1984, THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS ORDINANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1985, BY APPROPRIATING A TOTAL AMOUNT OF $784,952 FROM THE 1984 RETAINED EARN- INGS OF THE BUILDING AND VEHICLE MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT, $653,000 COMING FROM THE HEAVY EQUIP- MENT MAINTENANCE DIVISION AND $131,952 COMING FROM THE COMMUNICATION SERVICES DIVISION; INCREAS- ING REVENUES IN A LIKE AMOUNT TO FUND OUTSTAND- ING PURCHASE ORDERS FOR THE DIRECTOR'S OFFICE, $32,150, HEAVY EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE DIVISION, $595,452, PRINT SHOP DIVISION, $25,398 AND COMMUNI- CATIONS SERVICES DIVISION, $131,952 REMAINING AT THE CLOSE OF FISCAL YEAR 1984; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. ORDINANCE NO. 10009 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE, SUBJECT TO THE ELECTION HEREIN PROVIDED FOR, OF $7,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING THE COST OF DESIGNING, CONSTRUCTING, DEVELOPING, EXTENDING, ENLARGING AND IMPROVING THE BAYFRONT PARK OF THE AMERICAS IN THE CITY OF MIAMI, INCLUDING FACILI- TIES PROPERLY APPURTENANT THERETO, AND .THE IMPROVEMENT OF LAND FOR SUCH PURPOSES AND THE ACQUISITION OF EQUIPMENT THEREFOR, ALL SUCH ACTIV- ITY CONSTITUTING THE BAYFRONT PARK REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT; PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF AD VALOREM TAXES TO PAY SUCH BONDS. ORDINANCE NO. 10010 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE HOLDING OF A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION IN THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 13, 1985 WITH RESPECT TO THE ISSUANCE OF $7,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS FOR THE BAYFRONT PARK REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. ORDINANCE NO. 10011 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDI- NANCE NO. 9500, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLAS- SIFICATION OF APPROXIMATELY 3151.3199 SOUTHWEST 27TH AVENUE,2660 LINCOLN AVENUE and 2699TIGERTAIL AVENUE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN) FROM RG-2/5 GENERAL RESIDEN• TIAL (WITH SPI.3 OVERLAY) TO REG06 GErjERAL RESI• DENTIAL (WITHOUT SPI.3 OVERLAY) MAKING FINDINGS; AND BY MAKING ALL THE .NECESSARY CHANGES ON PAGE NO. 45 OF SAID ZONING ATLAS MADE A PART OF ORDINANCENO, 9500 BY REFERENCE AND DESCRIPTION IN ARTICLE 3, SECTION 300, THEREOF; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE: - ORDINANCE NO. 10012 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDI- NANCE NO, 9500, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLA$- SIFICATION OF APPROXIMATELY 5151,3199'S0UTHYIIEST 27TH AVENUE, 2660 LINCOLN AVENUE and 2099 TIGFRTAIL. AVENUE; M IAM), FL ORIPA, (MORE PARTICULARLY « �. D .I3Y A NEPEAL;EFl FRAvIBION :AttlP A E� EIA,�I�I>II,a.081�alE . �IT4� flK 101T'I/.OF MIAMI, I?W.IilDA, �t�"l1�i9M