Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-85-0678FA J-85-567 6-10-85 RESOLUTION NO. 85-67R A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE WORLD TRADE CENTER (A/K/A CENTRUST TOWER) PROJECT DEVELOPMENT ' ORDER (RESOLUTION 82-463, MAY 27, 1982), A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT LOCATED AT = APPROXIMATELY 100 SOUTHEAST 2ND STREET AND 201-299 SOUTHEAST 1ST AVENUE BY AUTHORIZING AN INCREASE IN HEIGHT FROM 562 FEET TO 587.09 FEET, THEREBY PROVIDING AN ADDITIONAL 27,910 GROSS SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE AREA; FINDING THAT SUCH AMENDMENTS DO NOT CONSTI- TUTE A SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION UNDER CHAPTER 380, FLORIDA STATUTES; AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO SEND COPIES OF THE HEREIN RESOLUTION TO SPECIFIED AFFECTED AGENCIES AND INDIVIDUALS. 1 WHEREAS, the City Commission issued a Development Order for the Miami World Trade Center project by Resolution 82-463, May 27, 1982; and WHEREAS, the herein increase in office space for the subject project represents an increase of only 4.7% of the gross square footage of office space; and WHEREAS, various professional studies presented by the applicant, evaluated by staff, and considered by the Commission, indicate that the herein amendments will not create a reasonable likelihood of additional adverse regional impact; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has considered the studies 4 and findings by consultants that indicate that the changes will generate additional trip -ends which are equivalent to less than 1 percent of the total average daily traffic volumes projected and f x less than 1 percent of the average daily traffic capacity for the - nY regional roadway links analyzed in the previously approved Application for Development Approval, thereby, creating no additional adverse regional traffic impact; and WHEREAS, the City Commission considers that the addition of 27,910 gross square feet of office area would be advantageous to the City of Miami, Metropolitan Dade County and the State of Florida; and WHEREAS, the Miami Zoning Board, at its meeting of May 20, ' 1985, Item No. 3, following an advertised hearing, by a vote of 7 �CITY COMMISSION ON y _ ME�I��LL�ii , "fi JUN 20 1985 4P to 0, GRANTED a variance for the herein increase in height; and WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of May 15, 1985, Item No. 3, following an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution PAB 40-85, by a 7 to 1 vote, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of modifying the subject Development Order, as set out below; and WHEREAS, the City Commission, after consideration of this matter, deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami to amend Resolution No. 82-463, being the World Trade Center (a/k/a CenTrust Tower) Project Development Order, as set out herein; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The City Commission, following an advertised public hearing at which interested parties were given the opportunity to be heard, hereby finds that the following amend- ment to Condition 1 of the World Trade Center (a/k/a CenTrust Tower) Development Order (Resolution 82-463, May 27, 1982) does not constitute a substantial deviation as described under Chapter 380.06 (17)(a)-(b) of the Florida Statutes. Section 2. The development Order issued by the City of Miami Commission (Resolution 82-463, May 27, 1982), approving with modifications the World Trade Center, a Development of Regional Impact to be located at 100 Southeast 2nd Street and 201-299 Southeast 1st Avenue, is hereby amended in the following particulars:) Condition 1 of the Development Order is hereby amended as follows: 1 Words and/or figures stricken through shall be deleted. Underscored words and/or figures shall be added. The remaining provisions are now in effect and remain unchanged. Asterisks indicate omitted and unchanged material. -2- x: =:z "Development. The development is limited to 5987865 626,775 square feet of gross building area, comprised of the following elements as specified by the Applicant in the Application for Development Approval. Element Gross Building Area (sq. ft.) Office Tower (35 37 Stories) Offices 593T369 621,275 F Restaurant 5,500 59ST865 626,775 This project utilizes air rights on a plane approximately 138 feet above grade above the subject parcels (above). The project is further limited by applicable provisions and procedures of the City of Miami Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 6871 as amended, as follows: The Miami Zoning Board on May +9 20, +982 1985, approved a variance to the 300 foot eight limiit in the C-3 of 568:99 587.09 feet above grade (average bottom of curb). The Miami Zoning Board had previously approved conditional use for a parking garage and variances for a reduction in truck loading bay spaces and sizes by Resolution Z13 148-80; July 21, 1980, and Resolution Zb 138-81 and 139-81; July 20, 1981; which parking garage is not a part of this Develop- ment of Regional Impact and for which the State Department of Veteran and Community Affairs has issued a Binding Letter dated October 21, 1981. #' Section 3. The herein amendment and the herein deletion, A- either separately or combined, are hereby determined to be changes which are not a substantial deviation from the terms and x i conditions of the May 27, 1982 Development Order; said changes being hereby found as necessary or helpful for effective moni- toring and enforcement of the said Development Order. Yam. rt` Section 4. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to immediately send certified copies of this resolution h`' to: The Florida Department of Veteran and Community Affairs, division of Local Resource Management, 2571 Executive Center # Circle East, Tallahassee, Florida 32301; the South Florida Regional Planning Council, 3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 140, W, Hollywood, Florida 33021; and Stanley B. Price, Esq., Fine, w Jacobson, Schwartz, Nash, Block and England, P.A., 2401 Douglas ' Road, Miami, Florida 33145. -3- 85_678, PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of June 1985. Maurice A. Ferre ` ATTEST: MA[7RICF. A. FERRE, Mayor RA PH i3. ONGIE City Clerk PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: E. MAX ELL As istant Cit ttorney AP p D A O F M AND CORRECTNESS: LU IA DOU HE Y I City Attorney RFC/wpc/415/jal -4- 85-6'78. . L T June 24, 1985 Mr. Stanley B. Price Fine, Jacobson, Schwartz, Nash, Block and England, P.A. 2401 Douglas Road Miami, Florida 33145 RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER PROJECT Dear Mr. Price: lease find a copy of Resolution No. 85-678, Enclosed herein p by the City of Miami Commission at its meeting passed and adopted held on June 209 1985, which is self explanatory. On behalf of the City of Miami, thank you for your attention. r truly yours, 57� R h G. Ongie City Clerk RGO:sl ENC: a/s June 24, 1985 Mr. Barry Peterson Director South Florida Regional Planning Council 3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 140 Hollywood, Florida 33021 RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER PROJECT Dear Mr. Peterson: Enclosed herein please find a copy of Resolution No. 85-678, passed and adopted by the City of Miami Commission at its meeting held on June 20, 1985, which is self explanatory. On behalf of the City of Miami, thank you for your attention. truly yours, 5W R 1ph G. Ong City Clerk RGO:sl ENC: a/s Di: June 24, 1985 Mr. Michael Garretson Director Florida Department of Veteran and Community Affairs Division of Local Resource Management 2571 Executive Center Circle East Tallahassee, Florida 32301 RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER PROJECT Dear Mr. Garretson: Enclosed herein please find a copy of Resolution No. 85-678, passed and adopted by the City of Miami Commission at its meeting held on June 20, 1985, which is self explanatory. On behalf of the City of Miami, thank you for your attention. Very truly yours, V' ;0I6S;?W- al h �G.Ongie City Clerk RGO:sl ENC: a/s CITY OF MIAMI. FLORID. - INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM The Honorable Mayor and Members DATE June 11. 1985 FILEt of the City Commission SUBJEZT RESOLUTION - RECOMMEND APPROVAL WORLD TRADE CENTER APPROXIMATELY 100 SE 2 STREET & Sergio Pereiraf 201-299 SE 1 AVENUE q�W �' + REFERENCES City Manager,ki V AGENDA - JUNE 20, 1985 ENCLOSURES. s. PLANNING AND ZONING ITEMS M° It is recommended that a) a finding r of no substantial deviation and b) ., an amendment to Paragraph 1; Exhibit "A", Resolution 82-463, May " 279 1982, as amended, being a { Development Order, approving with modifications, the Miami World Trade Center, a Development of Regional Impact located at , rx: approximately 100 SE 2 Street and ZU1-299 SE I Avenue be approved. {> The Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of May 15, 1985, Item 3, following an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution PAB 40-85 by a 7 to 1 vote, recommending approval of a) a finding of no substantial deviation and b) an amendment to Paragraph 1, Exhibit "A", Resolution 82-463, May 27, 1982, as ' amended, being a Development Order, approving with modifications, the Miami -` World Trade Center, a Development of Regional Impact located at approximately 100 SE 2 Street and 201-299 SE 1 Avenue, also described as Tract "A", WORLD TRADE CENTER SUB (115-41), which amendment permits an increase of 27,910 gross square feet in office uses from 593,365 gross square feet to 621,275 gross square feet, and in conjunction with the Zoning Board's consideration of a increase ,` variance to the height of the building from 562' to 587.09' from r.° average bottom curve (B.C. ). One opponent present at the meeting; six proponents present at the meeting. 3ackup information is included for your review. s. .r A RESOLUTION to provide for the above has been prepared by the City Attorney's 4 Office and submitted for consideration of the City Commission. =L A E PL :111 t cc: Law Department .�r r NOTE: Planning Department recommends: APPROVAL J t. a � � M. 85-'-67£. , r ;tom. PLANNING FACT SHEET APPLICANT Centrust Realty and Construction Company April 18, 1985 PETITION 3. APPROXIMATELY 100 S.E. 2ND STREET and 201-299 S.E. 1ST AVENUE Tract "A" WORLD TRADE CENTER SUB. (115-41) Consideration of recommendations concerning a) a finding of no substantial deviation and b) an amendment to Paragraph 1; Exhibit "A" Resolution 82- 463; May 27, 1982, as amended, being a Development Order, approving with modifications, the Miami World Trade Center, a Development of Regional Impact; which amendment permits an increase of 27,910 gross square feet in office uses from 593,365 gross square feet to 621,275 gress square feet, and in conjunction with the Zoning Board's consideration of a variance to increase the height of the building from 562' to 587.09' from average bottom curve (B.C.). REQUEST To amend the Miami World Trade Center Development Order to permit an increase of 27,910 gross square feet in office uses from 593,365 gross square feet to 621,275 gross square feet and to find that this charge does not constitute a substantial deviation; subject to the Zoning Board's grant of a variance to increase the height of the building from 562' to 587.09' from average bottom curve (B.C.). BACKGROUND The Miami World Trade Center Development Order (Resolution 82-463, May 27, 1982), permitted a maximum of 593,365 gross square feet of office uses in accordance with site plans submitted at that time. The plans provided for the location of certain mechanical equipment within the interior of the 34th and 35th floors. The applicant now finds that a roof location for the mechanical equipment would provide for additional elevators, and better management for the various office levels. This proposal frees up an additional 27,910 gross square feet for office uses on the 34th and 35th floors and increases the height of the building by two mechanical penthouse floors 36 and 37. On May 17, 1982 the Miami Zoning Board approved a variance to the then 300 foot height limit on the previously operative C-3 zoning district, of 562 feet above grade. The applicant's shifting of mechanical equipment to the roof will require an additional increase in height of 25 feet which will necessitate that the Zoning Board grant a variance. PAB 5/15/85 Item #3 Page 1 85-6` 15 . a _ a .j ,aR The Dade County Aviation Department has determined that the proposed increase would have no adverse impact upon the flight paths used by aircraft leaving the Miami International Airport. It should be noted that the World Trade Center is on air rights starting at 116'-3" above grade. ANALYSIS (See analysis attached) RECOMMENDATIONS PLANNING DEPT. Approval of the proposed amendment and a finding of no substantial deviation. PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD At its meeting of May 15, 1985, the Planning Advisory Board adopted Resolution PAB 40-85 by a 7 to 1 vote, recommending approval of the above. • L Y s PAB 5/15/85 Item i3 Page 2 M 85-6/ 8. _ w A*'ItN 2 a 16 Uj Q T. EAST S.E. movo��min 6 5 4 3k 1 5 4. N 7 Is 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 119 20 11 12 13 14 is 17 1 F L A G L E tis-T. m000pAo� 6 5 4 3k 1 5 4. N 7 Is 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 119 20 11 12 13 14 is 17 1 F L A G L E tis-T. m000pAo� .� 8R•j NPt ST mc� Q�bdO ! 0 S. F 3 ST. TR. lei 7 s 5 L %--I zo eo 30 BISCAYNE t, ! PAB May 15, 1985 AS 3f! 100 SE 2 Street 201 -299 SE 1st Avenue 857678.- Lf e L Pt t4 I . U 4.iry J•I WrOg, Ln ad of I Ip. . V f•­- 14 r;b 47 i%'- v ra PAB May 15, 1985 AS 100 SE 2 Street 201 - 20.9 c 1-+ Aonue < r� Ott Ya [ liS t. { � t A47 f 1� .q� .r` r i � -,!' r . t� - M 4 � � - � 1 4. v •1:i7. �! iRR+S4+x'.'d �^ (I� c ,.. '4 V1,4�t',',Y� �y- ` '�y �'' �ttt- ��.'��J :�`�.V+ I+yr�n•-;;`. /(�". '� } .,•f• q!',b '�9+ 'ram' �'�, 1 '� -� t _v�,`+Si i'�J t i.'.t; �'.i4'i-'^��t�� � ' � Th may, 1. � .A. . ►. 2Z ,•� f' ram` .,+ � , -{r1 �, � '• •Y �. ..f•t At "r t- - .'l� 1..�., In i% �` .r . � .. ;+. ;•�y'. l'' Jil, y � - �4 r- � ��.y.:,; 1�, "r.y ;,.11i.1 i f' �0 St:,�•.-► '"Y � �,�.J•►1.���� Y it �_,, ' . r .t.f•. � r ,T�}�l, � ',~ rf a r�s � tr y�•t ••+ t''1 1'Y �•- qt ii p• _k,:N'' .� ail r.,a-in'�y Yr X.7 + 1 }� • "LL1yr ; f ,,,Ttr, ,f� 4lIT LYF nj). -�% yam. « i7or 4"',^frrii. Waft 1 $t 1��� l jf }� •j, p�p�� - ti —_ �: { �k 1�;� fit, yj��� I .� / r �;, t •�r'% tJ n�.'�.+ ✓.i c4. ,�y r � Tom: - :� 0. 1�.4:t4i`lhw�_ T"R�i%•�Air�t1'�r- 1. , '*fi'• +n-V 1.r t�•.s s 'v�;�tr'P u V!. - .I y ~'.�^1i ai Y i'li `'•r' ,L, •�r- I•yl.s r ,,. �•;t ... .3 ,i (+'• 7>;�t i.(N.,=4�•t.:;}xl,r ,i, t�:+' jrjrr'r•f'T' +t•�t, M r � 1 F'�i ! ti{'6r .�f::Y.�t''',+4'St'�; ��+ _ n ;1 ( ;y,ywY,� f'ti {jfk xry �•f { Y I t,t' 4J'F.s`S� 3 i%;y,r5'i:•. ``J•"•I+�%s"= ��rt', ��s.j.;t"S;}rrr+.'�i➢':,,I ., ���<.� �h�.�A,alrri)���F,'i. �.• D C '°tl'' .� ,i:.'.•;�r.'i''.,�t �. ,•;; "r } . :+l•.,:' Y' .a.. �,J 'IL^ r:.a %'!i'i�, °`srX'i?';.►; + y;�� � „r� 1�,I��M �, J<��r�Y. t�. �.= ,,,4t,+��;>�'� 'tr�i` ids y'�tiai`%i1L,rL-+ s i.F�"�le��t��� 71;+�r}�ti''`�d •1�.,`.i°D ',v"� �'?t`Fi�L. h • r. t• . /,M+� ra t,,1 � ti + 1 r� t .an �M..•� �°' S� �d I � � ..• i i' r b L•Y 5 y ��.'�� �,1•`S ' ?�` r t� r�3 �.. � >fr � I Ir�t�j,'-!y''3i:t'i I t :r iYr it ..� r .. ,.. �Y !; �•`� ' "I '� { L•;l'�y .fa': �{ 41 ��}.�. ,�i'•�1 /'i h 7'�+�,�j• +, �S, a [, '.v f t ,, .1 r ;}i� �liF I, r • Y. {� ��^. •lr`[i'•s' �N•;Ij+�i••' 1�-� )'�. � � ,'F-fL r Cti ti .� V.ti �•rr �, IIlr+. fTaC .(!?, �w�, I+ a t,�,1\S + r w r1 M. t�s If i;� �+'n; �a ^`t..f n mil '��j..t>7 ?t � � »r"M• 1'� ��i..���({`.�t�+ a ?�ri'�S�} .+,� `.{. I�.,.:Y {f�,,_.•rt Z'� �th r �7 ~ tom,;,'` � •tY Y+•'1' /�j+tT�yy �'4 ��..rtN +` I\ ��y.L , .ii ` )i'rtc' ; �! ,, j�'�, } •'1`. iSS"'rr Y r . S�f i- a _5.l ?+ 3ih..4 �" � � ..., .Vi �;�•'Y •L! ' rY�' ��i;+; v 7'I j' II ,tff{ G�i ,y .,f �`i''M1�5�T��Y �,�tr't r�•�i� �' ,'''t _ � � /; ✓ 1I" /�' �Iq, �1 �4t.-:� �r �,j� �''': � .'yid t+'.' �r,�,'di+r.,,,;c"�'T.rw'".'�•r;'}: �d} f1`"�4�� �t� 't � � � L' 1t a�. ' ; a atS l F �, n (!µ, }� p+ �f+►� t { / F bx F+rft�wljs' SL •>ti F+b fl }tr`i1�f' r�lx '{ 1 J';'`� +ixi b�''{/'y,'4��j�''�*�. '�y�' i` '�'7 �w•:f�+/,xy iirJ�,`r_r!'r tl f}i. 11.r17,,(� *i K y �•\ � , •,,'ri �I yo. r� i(i'��"3.r ;+'� �. ,Y ��s ! � �: rl�t „r^ .•. p fj 1In, .) . A•,f 4y' i ' J.Stky '�if=4,',•�IF"�i`%}{. 'c+l^;:)r •.na}, !� f 2'',ri _ '. -�. 31,Jv�,�.r f r :�-aylY��y"•'41-y./'�J'.•i��l I ���1� �; '41�y i'; C-L'Y? `'F'Z.`tlt�j,i.'. i i.•���.t FI���C l.r.. ..ji•1,'.YZY� •r ri. ;};r 11 rr1.'+ FT' �i WS -� `tiyt •C' ��'< <`�'�`'.S�'�.:�yyi��•w�t'�i;�r,•��'.e:t,�^ ;?S-;��,srd, ��{;, ' �}',yl�:r �.�.; `%}�q�• ,7 ki�i jrY�' ?lot l�cr� � r.Lr�.'y��4 1t . I"1`?`Tyr u��,�^.f(� r C . �SLI •'jN' i�,,?r`(.5 �1��. 'i, v t•-';y{�,��'" Si�``i l�'`S'��,il�"�'ti ,..;�'�`'Z�.vif 5�17!3"IrY..:n ,•''d1 ' ,r� _ I�+4YG,r :s�'i. e'�'.:2'•L•fi ry a �y 1,.. �l.S• S } �� r�.� L��'" t a+r,� x J�rIF a't+• i ° ' I T+`n�G I � '�* rc f -v;, H � r ly, r a rr�'. Ssi:'M1, ftli 'L,e`, yyiE't�Y;.rr,♦'•L; .y�.1�+,•F 'Tyj'Sf� .t'�44 �,= �'Li 4� �`••1,R 'ry'�'t.. a'. r 1R s}ft,cl:ti,{�':��7i^°lrlrtt '��`; ��«!•� rI J t�4�+; ' r ��4 l�n•'t i I� : 1,� ��+ �f� �Fl 4i M � ,,qq��I� � �l •ija '4 tf, l' t(i ,7 ..• s r� . I ,a l' az .t � "' +a't .. ,'} i.'}'•{, C � • '�,, �kYJ q -�t.L* � t ji � pti Ft� 'f.-. 1' jam.` ,• 1•y�4''�!',t�`�•�,`���t����'1'�4•'f,�"�F":,L�'�\� r. ��(f',.•4+'�t1 �pY'� `1.,,r. �'• �, '11M}" ':'• ♦ ,� I !r Yyi � 7jK 'Asouth Elevation 7.7 Curtain Wall Tubes and �• Bracketsi7.5 vt l 4 /t } i 0 f* iiii 1111111j11j1lip still, 11111 01-iii11 (It111 ll'll jjw, iiii till,"+,,III;99w. t iiialli iiiiIli���„48; still '"'rr llli d 1+�11+ i '�"•�'- Nits I till 1 i l till + :..'Z�ai1►Y, till :o! r� it till�� it 1 1' �� 1 �i I 11 11 1 11 j-__ itit t1 jae�© I S OR too 7 - F Curtain Wall Louvers Fast Flevztion '�S' •'O• t T'�..,�'. ' � �i � _ •i _'.� � .. � .. •: YA l•.�,. . a►*i�ii .'tV J.4C�.,•'WI v 1J.a�tarMY. • .. � � . :T• tMr!y1is�G!f� I:!!wr70faMi�SaK!Yr�i�:i�.a7ritA�. _ '�%r•yy�/i'�iyp"�js�rir� •r�•.y�r,A.,r.►:.� _ ... .. ....—......�. .�..._. �...�.�.� .... .. � iris. � . .. _ ........ _ � ' -.... u. i■ CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING AND ZONING BOARDS ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT 275 NW 2 STREET MIAMI, FLORIDA 33128 APPLICATION TO AMEND DEVELOPMENT ORDER Section 2806 of Zoning Ordinance 9500, changes in approved Major Use Special Permit, reads as Follows: Changes in an approved final application for major use special permit, or final application • approved with attached modifications, conditions, or safeguards, may be permitted after application to the director of the Department of Planning by the original applicant or successors in interest. Upon receipt of such an application for change, the director of the Department of Planning shall prepare a statement demonstrating whether or not such changes would meet the same requirements as for the original approval. The director shall transmit such statement, together with recommen- dations on the proposed changes, to the City Commission. The Commission may take such action as in appropriate in the matter; provided, if the Commission has not acted after two (2) regular meetings of the Commission have been held- • following receipt of application for change, the recommendations of the director of Planning shall be deemed to have been approved. Where requests for changes are made that are found not to be within the requirements for original approval, application for such changes shall be made as for an original application for major land use special permit. REQUIREMENTS: 1. Current survey of the property, sketches and/or plans as required. 2. Affidavit as to current ownership of the property and application, as well as Disc:osure of Ownership form. 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within 375' radius from the outside boundaries of the subject parcel. 4. Fee of $300.00 to apply toward cost of processing. 85-678.. 1 1i1 !►iaap.►. • s: w..r . •sJ • y _ u4if3L rafi... y�r ,.i 2� r �' Ike .. ; •;v.!0+ i i t... . : a r�rrr { � r �r p# a� a :;wp�1i.•:.►rt�A+#�►?�'i}M�`rt..a1ti+:MIta-M�(�wr,�n�.ii..vt.. ..:tibwE- r �1'.`'d .rrt�.�lV:ro'�Il+;x,r i••'-;-r.��� �� .. . I.. ....►.v .J•L ....�...f.r ....� .. � ....►.M•w..�w./�•Ty..yyA•.I....�rr.� .v'r .1� .��f••'... .•r'!tbr .r � .+i+' DATE to cx % The under signed, being the owner or the representative of the owner, of the property located at Apnroximaiely 100 S.E. 2 Street AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS: "A" angld Trade Center Sub (115-41) tlegal aescripTiTURT— do(es) respectfully request the approval of the City of Miami for the following amendment(s) to the Development Order for the above -described property as defined by Florida Statute 380.06: See Attached. - SIGNATURE ' NAMEValerie F. Settles/Fine Jacobson Schwartz Nash Block and England,F.i • ADDRESS 2401 Douglas Road CITY, STATE, ZIP Miami, Florida 33134 This application is approved denied in accord with City Commission on Resolution No. other Form pnn_• • a f ... iYt.w ...Iwwr... •� �. •'K'R�'i►w� r• iyy S: 1�\ .�T, �l .. ., ::uiJ.�ij N• h i�AF�1++r"-- i�i••�.:1f�►. •MTV iiy.-�'f!1�'�1i"aMM•'��ytiii�Ni. '/►,.!jy'�.!q�J�1►tKT�.�wV�1M��•M►�riw6s7tY.LA�r'N�r CONDITION 1 OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER IS TO BE AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: Development 1. The development is limited to 5.98,865 626,775 square feet of gross building area, comprised of the follow- ing elements as specified by the Applicant in the Application for Development Approval. Element Gross Building Area(sc.ft.) Office Tower(35 37 stories) 59B 365 621,275 Offices 51500 Restaurant 5987865 626,775 This project utilizes air rights on a plan approximately 198 163 feet above grade above the subject parcels (above) '. FA AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FS=DA ) Ss. OCSJ,M OF DADE ) 4 Before me. the undersigned authority, this day per=%1117 appeared VALERIE F. SETTLES . ; who being by me first duly sworn. upon oath, deposes and says: 1. That he is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the acccmpanyl.Ing application for a public heari.mg as required by Ordinance No. 9500 of the Code of the City of Miocti, Florida. effecting the real property located in the City of Miami as described and Listed on the pages attached to this affidavit and clads a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he nams if any, have given their hill and complete permission for him to act in their behalf for the chmtge or -.edification of a classification or regulation of zmmmg as set out is the accompanying petition. 3. That the page-s attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the e:ureat names, mailing addresses. phene n=kers and legal descriptions for the real property which no is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts -as represented in the application and doeL---rts submi ted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and cm—. -=. Further Affiant sayeth not. Sworn to and Subscribed before me this = day of •- i^ 19 S Notael�Public, State of Florida at Iarse My Coand- si an Expires: My Caer•t"W FXOM F%&� s, 19J0 '"w1ftd thru MaynW gon66. (Name) VALERIE F. SETTLES e5-6715_ 13 4 OWNER'S LIST 1 Owner's 'lame i a-.. '-C-- . r� n.., : _ tlai l ing Address_ �,.. 0 0 - ,�.cQ c�.22_` r�-•�.,�-,. Telephone Number, r�-1 q ,n r-, ,j n Legal Description: Tr o-oe '' A " U-) m^9 -ate 'T r'0-cam Owner's Nave Mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Owner's Name Mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375' of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Descriotion ' Pry v� � 4LUNS Street Address Legal Description 714X 6�C Ltob SE ..rA twE - 10. Qb Street Address ;R:"t'� Legal Description 85--678. _ /q r r- f:' 0 DISCtLSGFE OF CAINUSHIP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: Approximately 201-299 S.E. 1st AVenue Tract "A" world Trade Center (115-41) 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: City of Miami Ordinance No. 9419 requires disclosure of all parties ha ing a financial interest, either direct or indirect. in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question I2 realires disclosure of all shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. The real property is owned by the City of Miami. The air rights are leased to Centrust Realty and Construction Company. �4-•.sZ�- 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. „ Q bo• Qo s y"'� 9o+s I'll 11�e *) g S to-5* S Ft- D. P..D. P k 'C4_ % S a,„cJ� �} ,,,,� 7- sac. Cb 4o, M �a :,1 �� Con v•e vi floe, C.4 n rev /� n•�.�� S b.srS p 4 )t Cf QQ4ER OR A=RZY FOR CWNER STATE OF FI ORM ) SS: C1=41Y Cc DARE ) VALERIE E. SETTLES , being duly sworn, deposes and says that ne is the (Qwwee) (Attorney for owner) of the real property described in answer to question fl, above; that he has read the foregoing answers and that the same are true and ccoplete; and (if acting as attorney for owner) that he has authority to ate this Disclosure of Ownership fora on behalf of the owner. Si4W 70 AND before me, tnis day of �� gat ; !i", r99 of ;- MY CO-' YYUSSI'W"Gki E*I.W: Nctary/Puc ic, Stbu of iio�ida at 1 am 3 ty00 raw-��F,,°►`!ri ram :� (over) 85-6 • 8_ L5 S- Planning Advisory Board Sergi o; Rodri guez, Di rector Planning Department A • ...a•+a . . r) . CITY '.)F MIAMI. 7LORIOA 1.`4'1­3:?-C.''iC:Z *ICUrlQiiA,'ICUM ,ATE: May 15, 1985 -,LE: :v9JEGT Analysis and Recommendations: World Trade Center 1CFERENC29: ,•�c�esu��s: Project Description Centrust Realty and Construction Company is proposing an increase in office use and an increase in the height of the tower. The project was, originally approved under Resolution No. 82-463, May 27, 1982, and utilizes air rights above an existing City of Miami. The original approval provided for the following elements: Offices 593,365 GSF Restaurant 5,500 GSF Height 562 Feet above grade Plans approved under Resolution No. 82-463, provided for the location of certain mechanical equipment within the interior of the 34th and 35th floors. The applicant now proposes to relocate the mechanical equipment from the 34th and 35th floors to the 36th and 37th roof levels. The applicant is proposing this change to permit the installation of additional elevators in the High -Rise Tier of the tower, which would also permit an improved arrangement of the various office level floor plans. The current request includes an increase of 27,910 gross square feet in office uses from 593,365 gross square feet to 621,275 gross square feet. The developers position is that this increase does not constitute a substantial deviation under Florida Statute 380.06 (17)(b). That statute provides that where an amendment is proposed to a previously approved development of regional impact that certain thresholds shall be presumed not to be a substantial deviation requiring further DRI review. The statute threshold applicable to office uses is as follows: "An increase in floor area proposed for non-residential use of not more than 5 percent or 10,000 square feet, whichever is less." The applicants' request represents an intermediate increase between the two presumptive criteria noted above. The applicants requested increase of 27,910 gross square feet of office space represents an increase of 4.7%, which is less than the 5% permitted increase under the statute, although the 27,910 GSF is 17,910 GSF in excess of the 10,000 GSF statute maximum. Since this threshold is presumptive, the burden of proof, as to whether this proposed increase will create Page 1 of 3 85-678. . A Planning Advisory Board May 15, 1985 an adverse traffic or environmental impact, rests with the applicant. The applicant, in responding to this question, has prepared various professional studies, which suggest that the proposed increase will not create a reasonable liklihood of additional adverse regional impact, or any other regional impact created by the change not previously reviewed by the regional planning agency. Specifically, pertaining to traffic the consultant finds that the change will generate additional trip ends which are equivalent to less than 1% of the total ADT (average daily traffic) volumes projected and less than 1% of the ADT capacity for the regional roadway links analyzed in the previously -approved ADA (Application for Development Approval). The Planning Department finds that these slight increases would not create a additional adverse regional traffic impact. The applicant is also requesting a Zoning Board variance to increase the height of the building by 25 feet from the previously approved 562 feet above grade to the proposed 587 feet above grade. The applicant is required to obtain clearance from the Dade County Aviation Department and the Federal Aviation Authority stating that the proposed height increase will not have an adverse affect upon the flight path, or the radio navigational signal systems relating to the movement of aircraft to and from the Miami International Airport. Preliminary investigation by the Dade County Aviation Department indicates that the proposed height increase will create no adverse navigational or flight impacts. Ramp and Street Construction The Development Order issued as part of Resolution o. 8Z-453 committed e applicant to make the following commitments: 1. Fund, bond or provide a letter of credit to the City and/or the State for any incremental costs to I-95 ramp construction and S.E. 3th Street, S.W. 1st Court and S.W. 4th Street construction necessitated by truck access to this project truck loading bays on S.E. 3rd Street. 2. Provide a letter of credit up to $416,000, in 1982 dollars, for certain street improvements. The applicants costs for sidewalk improvements on the project perimeter in the public right-of-way shall constitute an off- setting credit. 3. The applicant is to front end $2 million, in 1982 dollars, for construction costs of the I-95 bifurcated ramps based upon an equitable reimbursement agreement, if public sector financing is not completed by March 15, 1983. Public Facilities and Services The proposed changes will not create any adverse impacts. Land Use. The World Trade Center is consistent with the Miami Comprehensive Neigh or ood Plan and with the zoning requirement of the Central' Business District. Page 2 of 3 85-678. . 00 Planning Advisory Board Of May 15, 1985 Recommendation The Planning Department recommends approval of the proposed amendment and a finding of no substantial deviation. SR/JAL/mv Page 3of3 85-678_ . /g -�.�yrL11)Ij�►1.=.�i�..ifnr"'./wA"iJ�i•.1N41V �::•.I�.i.iti:.±., �.•rN•A••.'!'•..Ga:�►•: •. irr. .. .�as•�IifitAYii:.�'•5„/ly�. .a�. _..'�:+•�►o•.:' :.. .[ r t�.:�` a.t t 7 _...'.. i%lio?°�t�4M►`�Sr11Mr�rarr?I•IRiI'M!!11>tili�llM�ryliM�itci�!irf��M.fi+�•YA.:�Ilrs f r•a .-. f • Fi Ne JACOBSON SCHWARTZ NASH BLOCK St ENGLAN O. P. A. 2401 DOUGLAS ROAD MIAMI. FLORIDA 33148 NwwA 1. APONsoN R/CNAaO A. JOMtRM[R (SOS) Aal! •2200 !9+ sANDRA L"MR90 RANCH RANTNCR TCLtx St"2e MRIAN L. MELT TN[ODORC ALCIN 7 WILLIAM J. ROGER J. IM/LIa LANOiWN CAIILL MIAMIL.AW SRfCMELL O//1C[ 1 RAUL etftK='rt MC"*V LATINta WwIN J. SLOCII MONNIC J. LOSAR SUIT[ TOO N re"CLL a. MLOONSC$4 MANUCI. LUSt4 7'?•1 SR�CR[LL AvtNUt "a• S. MROORS LAwwCNCC r. MICNCLSON ANTMONV J. CARRIUOLO DAVIO 11. MITCMCLL MIANI, rLORIDA aalil NAR/LTN J, W. CCSARANO CMARLES C. MULLER. II (3051 JT4 • It00 0OMCRT A. CMAVCS MARTIN J. NASH GAwV ;AV CO"[N wILL1AN JAV PALMER TtLL11 964314 *RUCL ;AV COLAN OLIvt a. PAwK[R CAMLt FLORIOALAW RtVIN M. CMAS O[OR6t 1. PLATT ARTMUR J. CNOLANO. JR. R[SCIIAM J. POSTON MAwrIN rINC STANLCY M. Pol1C[ R. LAUDtROALt• ORRICE JONArNAN M.Oweem CMARLCS RUMIN 7�O SOU TM CAST TMIRO AVCNUC NARK O. OaOMMMAN SCNJAMIN S. SCNWAaTE M AaVIN 6 OUTTta JOSEPM M. SCROTA FT. LAUOCROALt rLORIDA »ale OCHNIS A. MAAS VALCRIC P. SCTTLCS D(SOS) AO=•ZMOO ALC A. MCCRCRLINO M/CMACL M. SHAPIRQ OtRALO T.M(►►CaNAN OART SNtaNAN CAMLt FORTLAW STCP"C" L MCLFMAN STUART L. SIMON SUaT s. M[LLNAN TRACT[ IL SOLOVC "NA M. NCRALD OONALO R. TESCMtN Or COUNSCL OCMONAM FLAILS HOCHMAN RICNARO JAT wC11115 QCNt CSiNtR STUANT K. MOrr1AAN LINOA ANN VI[LLS MCANARD dACOSSON JUL1[ A. S. WILLIAMSON May 2, 1985 Sergio Rodriguez, Director City of Miami Planning Development 275 N.W. Second Street. Miami, Florida 33130 Re: CenTrust Tower, a world trade center (Miami World Trade Center DRI) �F Dear Mr. Rodriguez: CenTrust Realty and Construction Company ("CenTrust") has amended its plans for CenTrust rower, a world trade center ("CenTrust Tower"). Under the new plans there will be an increase in the gross square footage of CenTrust Tower of 27,920 feet. The CenTrust Tower will oe 47 stories high, as opposed to the previously approved 45 stories. A. ' CenTrust Tower has been reviewed as a Development of Regional Impact ("DRI") pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes ("Chapter 380"). the City of Miami (the "City") issued a Development Order on June 1, 1982. This Development Order was amended by the City on May 24, 1984 to allow for an extension of time for completion of construction of the CenTrust Tower, As this project falls within the jurisdiction of Chapter 380, any proposed changes to the development plan must comply with this statute. N Specifically, Section 380.06, 17(a) provides that a developer must submit proposed changes to a previously approved ` development order to the local government for a substantial deviation determination. Pursuant to tnis section, the proposed changes to the CenTrust Tower must be reviewed by the t City and the City must determine whether or not these A y: Jw constitute a substantial deviation. e5-676.. 19 10 .. r •Ml�1!�r'*•.. .. ... ,. �_4�irtr:..iF !ti•t:i sr►>ieLr'..•r._ Sergio Rodriguez May 2, 1985 Page -2- as: A "substantial deviation" is defined under Chapter 380 "...any change to the previously approved development of regional impact which creates a reasonable likelihood of additional adverse regional impact, or any other regional impact created by the cnange not previously reviewed by the regional planning agency (emphasis added)." In accordance with the above criteria, the City must review the proposed changes to the :.enTrust Tower and determine if these will create any new or additional adverse regional impact. We.filed our request to amend the Development Order with the City on April 19. On IMay 15, the application will go before the City of Miami Planning and Advisory Board ("PASO), which will make a recommendation on the substantial deviation to the Miami City Commission ("the Commission"). The Commission will hold the substantial deviation determination hearing on June 27, 1985. On this date the final decision regarding the -proposed changes will be made. Chapter 380 gives the local government some additional guidance in determining what is not a substantial deviation. Section 380.0617(b) lists certain changes to DRIB which are presumed not to be substantial deviations requiring further review. For the purpose of the CenTrust Tower review only one of these presumptions would apply. This section provides that an increase in the floor area proposed for non-residential use, of not more than five (5%) percent or ten thousand (10,000) square feet whichever is less, shall be presumed not to be a substantial deviation. The proposed increase to the floor area of the Tower is 27,920 square feet in office space. This is less than a 5% increase in f loor area and though it is over 10,000 square feet, the small percentage of increase should give the City some guidance in evaluating its impact. If the Commission finds that there is no substantial deviation it must amend the Development Order to reflect the proposed changes and must notify the South Florida Regional Planning Council ("Regional Planning Council") and the Department of Community Affairs of the changes to the Development Order. These agencies have the right to appeal the' determination under Section 380+.07, within 45 days of the hearing. 85-6`r8. . FINE JACOBSON SCHWARTZ NASH BLOCK & ENGLAND. P.A. . .Xa �'�..�.�.fL.h 1. .Lr'.M..W! ��►.•:�.r��. . _ � ..r4 Z . ..► Y h.•, ,; �`..„� � _ .. . �• T.:.. • �•IY-. •• .i�.iJ,l��f �•�••/yi' �•0_I: „1� -•��".�"T.�-+-1:a:.�• r .. ..��� �... .. A���/�. +1� y Sergio Rodriguez May 2, 1985 Page -3; TheRegional Planning Council is very sensitive to 9 9 Y increased growth in the downtown Miami area. On April 29, 1985 we met with the Regional Planning Staff to present them with the proposed change. In their opinion the precentage of increase of floor space is minor, even though it is over 10,u00 square feet, due to the total size of the building, and the density of the downtown area. We agreed to provide them with some traffic projections (which we have attached). It appears that the Regional Planning Council will have no problem if the change is found not to be a substantial deviation. In addition to the attached traffic study, the proposed change has been evaluated to determine what if any impact it has on the previously approved DRI. As the attacnea report evidences, the change will not create any new or additional adverse regional impact. As such, it is not a substantial deviation as defined in Chapter 380. Please do not hesitate to call upon if any further amplification is required. FINE JACOBSON SCHRARrZ SASH BLOCK & ENGLAND, P.A. By:2ts�S)e"" cc: Mr. Walter Pierce Mr. Joseph McManus 8077E 050685/3/LB 85_6` 8. . FINC JACOBSON SCMWARTz NASM BLOCK & ENGLAND. P.A. iI `A • I f� 1 ' i DAVID PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 3 � May 1, 1985 Mr. David Marshall South Florida Regional Planning Council 3440 Hollywood Blvd. Suite 140 Hollywood, Florida 33021 Re: Centrust Tower/Miami World Trade Center - #5149 Dear David, We appreciated meeting with you and Mr. Rod Arroyo on Monday, April 29, 1985. As we discussed at that meeting, two additional floors are being proposed for the Centrust Tower/ Miami World Trade Center. The approved Project represents 598,865 square feet of gross floor area (GFA) . The additional two floors would add 27,920 square feet of GFA for a total of 626,785 square feet of GFA or less than a 5% increase. The vehicle trip ends generated by the additional 27,920 square feet would be slight. Previously approved area trip generation rates, with adjustments made in the inputs for increased transit ridership (i.e., 30% daily and 35% peak hour) and auto occupancy (1.5 persons per vehicle) for downtown locations, were used to project 24-hour and peak hour traffic increases as a result of the additional square footage. That increase was then compared to the Project's traffic volumes as projected by the South Florida Regional Planning Council in their Development of Regional Impact Assessment (dated May, 1982). The resultant increase, as shown below, is approximately 4% on a daily basis and less than 2% on a peak hour basis. Additional Additional Trig Ends Trip Ends As % Of DRZ Assessment 24-Hour + 162 + 4.0% AM Peak + 22. 1.6 PM Peak + 21 1.5 422• %LZE00 STREET • CORAL CABLES • FLOR101 '3146- 1305) 444.2116 ��tMti+r �O�MY�MLt ��i�iMliY►�4�r•w'•w.. .:�.... • � . �• .i.,. _ .. .V•.r.� > :.�s.+a� •a }: �. •L. .. ..wA..ri.. .. .+,. � � .. ti►:.rft'mMi.w.'Mtiw.�..=b.w.�eyti•'!#� wl��:► � . v •rvt![.:..i �.� �' . �w���►7 > .. �► t Mr. David Marshall Re: Centrust Tower/Miami World Trade Center - #5149 May 1, 1985 Page Z Splitting these volumes by inbound and outbound movements, assigning them to the Project driveways and distributing to the external roadway network would result in immeasurable differences in traffic volumes as a result of the additional square footage. In fact, the additional daily trip ends as a result of this increased square footage would be less than 1% of the total ADT volume projected and less than 1% of the ADT capacity for those roadway links analyzed in the ADA. If you require any further information concerning the above, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, / Mark J. Gillis MJG/vl cc: Ms. Valerie Settles Mr. Rod Arroyo Ms. Sharyn Dodrill 85-678. . P3 : . Project #5149 May, 1985 CENTRUST TOWER SUMMARY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ADDITIONAL GFA) Prepared by: David Plummer & Associates 4225 Salzedo Street Coral Gables, Florida 33146 I I 85-678.. •AR'iilYM.fr•.. r�y,..�a!re CLAM ►}.rl.�• i.YA. .e.f�tJL �..' .. .':: _.r11/.^:1 r. t.• ..�', ♦��. ..� �. A�,�i rrtY.�7�'" .'i��+�!'�P!!�ir.�'.�%�7ffiA"IC��IIY,•w.�AM.'ItlM'.+etiiYwL�i�iN?:�i1F!! t., ., r . CENTRUST TOWER ' SUMMARY IMPACT ASSESSMENT ADDITIONAL 27,920 0 GROSS FLOOR AREA INTRODUCTION Two additional floors are being proposed for the CenTrust Tower/Miami World Trade Center. The approved Project totaled 598,865 square feet of gross floor area (GFA). The additional two floors would add 27,920 square feet of GFA for a total of 62.6,785 square feet of GFA. This is less than a 5% increase. The Miami World Trade Center Application for Development Approval (dated August, 1981) and the South Florida Regional Planning Council's DRI Assessment (dated May, 1982) were reviewed to identify the potential impacts associated with this increase. (Although each impact is discussed herein the SFRPC has only requested a response describing the additional traffic impacts.) Since the date of approval for the CenTrust Tower, certain guidelines and standards used by the South Florida Regional Planning Council for assessing Developments of Regional Impact have changed (i.e. wastewater flow calculations). This analysis is based on the impacts associated with the additional GFA (27,920 square feet) using current guidelines and comparing that increase to the magnitude of original impacts as reported in the approval ADA and DRI Assessment. - 1 - 85--678.. � � .; �•�: ridri��'rra/ia+►i+L!yi6:0'i.1':u' �ir*ri.r. -Jrr. % i.+ _..�rVf ... A•:. _ r.� .r _ `•N►7 M+!�?,yA�!yr#laE+i+r.J!�semirs!!3r-4WTs/%::rS-4M:►-.0-11700:r+r..e.:.�...••�..:»•..• GROSS FLOOR AREA The size of the original Project and a comparison to the expanded project are summarized in the following table. Approved Use Building Increase Total Impact Office 593,365 0 27,920 0 621,285 0 +4.718 Restaurant 5,500 -- 5,500 TOTAL 598,865 0 27,920 0 626,785 0 +4.66% EMPLOYMENT The original Application for Development Approval projected a total of 2,380 permanent employees for the Project. Of this total, approximately 25 were employed by the restaurant. The et" remaining 2,355 office/bank employees would equate to one employee per 252 square feet GFA. Application of that same ratio to the additional office space would result in an additional 110 employees. ' Approved Use Building Increase Total Impact :. Office 2,355 110 2,465 +4.678 _ ? Restaurant 25 -- 25 '- TOTAL 2,380 110 2,490 +4.62% 'a LAND, WATER, WETLANDS, VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE No adverse impacts on land, water, wetlands, vegetation and wildlife conditions were projected for the approved Project. The additional GFA would not alter the original findings of the ADA . or DRI Assessment. - 2 - 85-678_ - p 'x; ar;�4��..yS M.i'1.��`1' . �.:•�R+�M�T✓..4i, ' .1ir�Mi ... �> i ,� _ ... .. • �.3� • .. • ;�r L : �ri� � • .. i:f4iatiAia► �• .� .► . , 1 1 - c 1ift.?�!!' �► iVM+}1N!►i:1 .VAtpo'L•�Vs�.iAl�► .i.� HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES No adverse impacts related to historic and archaeological sites were projected for the approved Project. The additional GFA would not alter the original findings of the ADA or DRI Assessment. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT Wastewater flow from the approved Project and the additional GFA would be accommodated by the Miami Dade Water and Sewer Authority. Uncommitted capacity was available for the approved Project sufficient to accommodate the average day and peak flow. The additional GFA proposed would result in less than a 4.2% increase in average day and peak wastewater flow to that originally projected in the ADA and DRI Assessment. No effluents containing hazardous or toxic wastes would be discharged as a result of the additional GFA. As originally identified, no on -site treatment and disposal for the Project is intended. Average Day Peak Flow Approved Buis 67,000 gpd Increase +2,792 qpd Total Impact 69,792 gpd +4.171 268,000 gpd +6,980 gpd 274,980 gpd +2.60% The additional GFA would not alter the original findings or recommendation of the ADA and DRI Assessment. 3 85--578.. 7 -.1.��1:i tr•r��s.r� ' C► .•"me"'µ* ..iY �:r• • . i• •M .. .. .. � � . iir..• WATER SUPPLY Potable water supply will be provided to the approved Project and the additional GFA by the Miami Dade Water and Sewer Authority. The additional GFA would result in less than a 4.2% increase in average day and peak water demand to that originally projected in the ADA and DRI Assessment. Average Day Peak Flow Approved Building 67,000 gpd 268,000 gpd Increase +2,792 gpd +6,980 gpd Total Im.2act 69,792 gpd +4.17% 274,980 gpd +2.60% The additional GFA would not alter the original findings or recommendations of the ADA and DRI Assessment. SOLID WASTE Solid waste generated by the additional GFA for the Project would be less than 3% of the solid waste generation projected for the approval Project. No industrial or other wastes ,requiring special treatment are projected as a result of this increase. Solid wastes will be collected by a private hauling company under contract and disposed of by the Dade County Solid Waste Disposal Division. Approved Building Increase Total Impact Tons/Day 4.9 +.14 5.04 +2.86% Cubic Yards/ 17.3 .49 17.79 +2.83% Day - 4 - 85-678.. � �V k- - �Nr.i.•T. S. Pei.rr.liir71A�.1+i"�1�w►1e4 M.i ..W'f i�. • \1+�:�:: �.�.ws __ :� �w y..�• t�..... .. •r � l�•'!L� �.rr�i�tw, , _ \ r r.i ,n. The additional GFA would not alter the original findings or recommendations of the ADA and DRI Assessment. DRAB A drainage plan was prepared for the approved Project. The additional GFA will not result in an increase in impervious surfaces on the site and will have no additional impact on the drainage system. ENERGY As with the approved Project, electricity will be the energy source for the additional GFA. (Natural gas would be used for cooking and water heating in the on -site restaurant.) CBoth Florida Power and Light Company and Peoples Gas System indicated that adequate power and facilities were available to serve the approved Project. Increased energy demand as a result of the 4.71% increase in office GFA should be slight and well within the capability of the suppliers. Previously proposed energy conservation measures for the approved Project would be applicable to the additional GFA. HEALTH CARE Emergency medical service will be provided to the approved Project and the additional GFA by the City of Miami Fire Department Rescue Squad and Randle -Eastern Ambulance Service. The additional GFA should have no measurable impact on response times. - s - 85-+678- - 2 - ,.-% 4-4 - • FIRE/POLICE As with the approved Project, fire and police service would be provided by the City of Miami's Fire, Rescue and Inspection Services Department and the Miami Police Department. The additional GFA should have no impact on the findings and recommendations identified for the approved Project in the ADA and DRI Assessment. TRAFFIC Vehicular, pedestrian, service/delivery and transit access to the Project would not be altered as a result of the additional GFA. Peak hour and 24-hour vehicle trip ends generated by the additional 27,920 square feet would be slight. Previously approved area trip generation rates, with adjustments made in the inputs for increased transit ridership (i.e. 30% daily and 35% peak hour) and auto occupancy (1.5 persons per vehicle) for downtown locations, were used to project 24-hour and peak hour traffic increases as a result of the additional square footage. That increase was then compared to the Project's traffic volumes as projected by the South Florida Regional Planning Council in their Development of Regional Impact Assessment (dated may, 1982). The resultant increase, as shown below, is less than 41 fir on a daily basis and 28 on a peak hour basis. 85-67& F, �+�•:'►7i�V�.rr.YM�M�� 'r'+itiwr�.i�• tr►r.►._,• -. .:�.....•�• ...� - •• ....�Z- a :v..•.:►.. �. .. �.. ..i.. 0 M.Rlftl!t;�Fiw�MCW.'ir..r �VM71..;►•�ry•►.w•i.7.L.�t�••::'�%w�•Z •1.*"�+�L•t�•ir.. i�it��r.r .a-�.i.i'.�'.'•rlR�"•�. .. � ; .. v!: , r ;fE+.•� .- •,:,7��,,,.�.� i .••.-mow-+ .+- .!'(Y�.� ...� �. . Additional Trip Ends 24-Hour +162 AM Peak + 22 PM Peak + 21 Additional Trip Ends as Percent of DRI Assessment +3.96% +1.58% +1.47% Splitting these volumes into inbound and outbound movements at the Project driveways and assigning them to the external roadway network would result in immeasurable differences in traffic volumes as a result of the additional square footage. In fact, the additional daily trip ends as a result of this increased square footage would be less than IS of the total ADT volume projected on any roadway link analyzed in the ADA and less than 1% of the ADT capacity of those same roadways. C PARKING There are no off-street parking requirements for the approved Project due to its location in the Miami Central Business District. No parking spaces are required, therefore, for the additional GFA. A total of 500 parking spaces are to be allocated within the World Trade Center parking garage for the Project. This would equate to a parking ratio of one space per 1,200 square feet for the approved Project and one space per 1,255 square feet with the additional GFA. - 7 - 85--678, •2'�i ._ .L /!• _ ��i ••rr� ��+�bw.��:+e�•. 1JI+InirWUM♦ �'tir^ �•".:' •.�.....:1� .. ..,�. 0 cM•Agr•+r: iS".'�� "�.' i'/��inN•AF/Nra►•Mw`wrYrrrri g1r.r ...+spry„ srar The parking ratio for the approved Project and with the additional GFA implies that a certain portion of the Project's employees and visitors will shift to transit and other non -auto modes of access while others will park in other available parking facilities in the vicinity of the Project. The additional GFA for the Project could result in a projected demand for approximately 20 to 25 additional off -site parking spaces. 32.,.