HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-85-0812-IN
,Is
J-85-748
8/1 3 /85
!L 2 1 Rls0L1TTTON NO. ,..
A RESOLUTION OF THF, CITY of MIAMT COMMr.ggTON
AMENDING PARAGRAPH 6, F`{'{riiI'P "A," �7F
RESOLUTION 75-135 DATED FEBRUARY 12, 1975, AS
AMFNDED, RrTNG A DFVF1,t)PMENT OPDFP APPRnVIN(;
WITH MODIFICATIONS THF, t'LAUGHTnN TSLAND
PROJF;C'P, A DEVEL,()PM!?N1'P OF RFr; TONAL TMPA('T;
AUTHORr7TNG 'PRE CITY MANAGER TO AMEND C'ERTAIPI
AGREEMENTS RFFERENCE,1) (ri RPq',)L[rTTO``I 75-423
DATED APRIL 22, 1975, REING PARAGRAPH R OF
"THE STIPULATION OF AGRFr;MFN'P 'rn CONnTTTON
DEVELOPMENT ORDER AND TO DTSMISS APPEAL," AND
PARAGRAPHS 1 AND 5 OF AT'T'ACHmENT [I THE
MEMORANDUM OF UNnERSTANDTNG [tA'r'FD MAY 14,
1975, TAF'TT,4FEN Ci,AfiGHTON TSLA.ND TNVF;S'I'()RS AND
THE CITY OF MIAMI IN REFERFNCE To LOW INICOMF
HOUSING, WHTCH AMENDMFNTS A ,r,rm OPTIONS TO
CLARIFY TENURE, INCREASE, THE N(TMRER OF UNITS,
CHANGE THE Lc)CATION FROM rf,AfIGIiTON ISLAND TO
TWO SEPARATE AREAS T41THIN THE CITY OF MTAMT?
UPON CITY COMMISSION APPROUAI.; SP CTPYTNG
TIME OF COMPLFTTON; FURTHFR, FINDINr, THAT
SAID AMENDME1J'T'1q no qnT CONSTI'PUTR SURSTAN'T'IAr,
DEVIATIONS FROM THE TPRMS 00 THE; nEVF[,OPMF'NT
ORDER, AND DIRPC'PTNC; THF ('T'rY CLERK TO Sf,Nr)
COPIES OF TN IS RF;SOLUTTON TO AFPFCTED
AGENCTFS AND THE DFVFLOPER.
WHEREAS, the Miami Planninq Advisory Roard, at its meeting
of July 10, 1985, Item 2, f.oIIowinq an advertised hearing,
adopted Resolution No. PAB 43-85, by a 7 to 1 vote recommending
that the City Commission find that the proposed amendments to the
Clauqhton Island nPvelopment Order, as hereinafter set Forth, Jo
not constitute substantial deviations; further, recommending said
amendments to the City Commission; and
WHEREAS, the City of Miami Commission by Resolution 75-135;
February 12, 1975, issued a Development Order, approvinq with
modifications the Clauqhton island project, a Development of.
Regional Tmpact to be located on Clauqhton Island, beinq All of
BRICKFLL KEY ON CLAUGHTON ISLAND "SF,CTION ONE" (113-18); All of.
BRICKELL
KEY
ON
CLAUGHTON
ISLAND
"SECTION
TWO" (118-47); Al
of
RRICKFL,L
KEY
ON
CLAUGHTON
ISLAND
"SECTION
THREE" (119-70);
and
UNPLATTED LAND within the bulkhead line lass that property shown
in Official Records 11344 at page 1079-1334, which Development
• Order was clarified by Resolution 75-423; April 22, 1975; and
CITY COMMISSION
t
MEETING
JUL 25 1985
A.
(<E MANhS
WHEREAS, the City of Miami Commission has passed a motion of
intent, being Motion 85-340; March 28, 1985, expressing their
intent of al towing the developer t,) chan(le the Ohl igation
regarding location for certain low-income units from Claughton
Tsland to the mainland; and
WHEREAS, this chan(7e is sufficient tc) warrant an amendment
to the neve.lopment Order; and
wHERFAS, the City Commission dee-ns it advisahle and in the
hest interests of the general welfare of the ritv of Miami to
amen-d the Development Order_ as hereinafter set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The Development Order for the Claughton
island project, approving with modifications the Claughton Island
project, a Development of Regional. Impact, being Exhibit "A" of
Resolution 75-135 dated February 12, 1975, is hereby amended with
respect to paragraph 6, in the followinq particular I:
6. The South Florida Regional planning Council has
found a complete lack of medium and moderate
income housing units on the Island and, therefore,
recommended denial. The developer has offered to
furnish 300 units of medium income housing
charginq a rental fee that does not include a
figure for capitalized land value. The developer
represented to the Planninq Advisory Board that
the rental for these units would be approximately
$300 per month. The Planning Advisory Board found
that this figure would he above the low income
threshold. The Planninq Advisory Board encourages
1Words and/or figures stricken throuqh shall be deleted.
Underscored words and/or figures shall be added. The remaining
provisions are now in effect and remain unchanges. Asterisks
indicated omitted adn unchanged material.
- 2-
85-81_2
..
the developer to provide at least inn units For
medium -moderate income hr)usinq. The City
Commission finds that the developers ;haII a)
provic?e low income housing and requires not less
than 200 units on the I,1and to he developed and
rented in the manner set_ Forth by the-3,,veloper.
(with future rents heinq subject to the Consumer
Price Index), or b) provide not less than two
hundred and twenty-f.ive (225) units of moderate
income affordable housing distributed among two
separate sites of the City other than the
Overtc)wn/Parkwest areas; further, stipulating that
the developers shall. select the aFormentioned
sites and return to the City Commission prior to
commencinq construction, for review anti approval
of said site selection, not more than six months
from the date of Resolution No. 95-812, or
January 25, 1986; further, stipulating that under
either option the units shall he completed and
ready for occupancy within 18 months. The City
will not accept money in lieu of construction.
* * * 11
Section 2. The City Manager is hereby authorized and
directed to amend the following agreements which were approved by
and incorporated in Resolution 75-423 dated April 22, 1975:
Amendment:
"STIPULATION OP AGREEMENT TO CONDITION
DEVELOPMENT ORDER AND TO DISMISS APPEAL
*
B. The Developer has submitted a Memorandum of
Understandinq to be entered into by and between
the City of Miami and the Developer which
Memorandum is attached hereto and made a part
hereof as "Attachment I." The Developer agrees to
be bound by the provisions thereof in order to
-3-
S5`81-Aw
4 6
assure that a) a minimum OF 200 unity of low-
~ income housino as defined therein shall. he
provided wi-}h}R 1-f1—yea rs and fq rtv €om- ays, ter
by Mareh 29 19A9 as an i.me(jr_al part c)f. the
overallveIopmPnt scheme of ('laughton Tslan(I
with future rents heinq subject to the Consumer
Price Tndex), or b) shall provide not less than
two hundred and twenty-five (225) units of
moderate income affordahle housing equally
distributed among two separate sites of. the -7i.ty
other_ than the Over town/Pa rkwest areas; further,
stipulating that the developer shall select the
aformentioned sites and return to the City
Commission prior to commencing construction, for
review and approval. of the site selection, not
more than six months From the date of Resolution
No. 85-812, or January 25, 1986; further,
stipulatinq that under either option the units
shall. he completed and ready for occupancy by the
time certain as required by the Development Order,
Amendment:
AMENDMENT T
"MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWFEN CLA[1GHTON
ISLAND INVESTORS AND THE CITY OF MIAMT IN RE LOW
INCOME OR MODERATE INCOME AFFORDABLE HOUSING
1. The Investors shall provide a) not less than 200
units of low-income housinq as hereinafter
defined. Re later than Pehrruar-• 2,--1Q9!;r Said
units may be interspersed throughout the areas of
the Clauqhton Island Development designated on the
Development Plan for residential units in
accordance with the aforesaid Resolution 75-135,
and may be provided by the Developer at such
I
6 - 4- S5_ 1.a�.
s
t imps, .and in such numhers an(, in such manner as
the Investors desire, consistent with the
Development Order.. or h) shall provide not less
than two hundred and twenty-five (225) units of
moderate income aff-or_dable housinq distrihuted
amonq two separate sites of the City other than
the Overtown/Parkwest areas; further, stipulatinci
that the developer shall select the afor-mentioned
sites and return to the City Commission prior to
commencing construction, for review and approval
of the site selection, not more than six months
from the date of Resolution No. 85-812, or January
25, 1986; further-, stinulatin�i that under either
option the units shalt he completed and ready for
occupancy by the time certain as required by the
Development Order, as amended.
5. Nothinq herein shall he construed as restr.ictinq
the Investor from developing or constructioq more
than the minimum number of units required, nor
shall it be construes] as reauirinq any particular
schedule for the construction of said units so
long as not less than a) 200 or b) 225 of such
units, depending on the option selected, are
completed and availahle for occupancy by February
12,--19g-s' in a manner consistent with the
Development Order, as amended. This Memorandum is
R
solely for the purpose of clarif_yinq the meaning
and intent of the parties as set forth by all
parties at the time the aforesaid Resolution No.
3 75-135, as amended, was passed by the City of
Miami.
Section 3. The City Commission, following a public
hearing at which interested parties were given the opportunity to
I:
-5-
h
b'5-81. 4
k
amend the Stipulation of Agreement and
Memorandum of
he heard,
hereby finds that the amendment to the
Development nr.der
and
the companion authorizations for
the City Manager
to
Under_standinq do not constitute suhstantial devi at ions
from
the
Claughton Island nevelopment nr_ ler.
ar)rnroved by
the
City
— Commission by Resolution 75-135 dated
Fehruar_v 12,
1g75,
as
amended. The City Commission also finds that the option of
allowinq the developer to build 225 units of housinq on the
mainland, rather than Claughton Tsland, achieves the same social
objectives without cr_eatinq a reasonable likelihood of additional
adverse regional impacts or any other regional impact created by
the change not previously reviewed by the regional planning
agency.
Section 4. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and
directed to immediately send certified conies of this Resolution
to: the Florida Department of Community Affairs, Division of.
Local Resource Management, 2571 Executive C«'nter Circle Fast,
Tallahassee, Florida 32301, the South Florida Reqional Planning
Council, 3340 Hollywood Roulevard, Suite 140, Hollywood, Florida
33021; Fdward Clauqhton, 777 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1130; Charles
Juenglinq, Swire Properties, Tnc., 777 Brickell Avenue; and,
Charles K. Cheezem, President, Cheezoms Investment Corporation,
777 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1116, all at Miami, Florida 33131.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of July , 1985.
TTEST: Maurice A. Feifrg
MAURICF FE'RRE
Q
ZRA�LreG. ONGIE
ity Clerk
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
(. iJall
J EL E. MAXWE
ssistant City Attorney
APPROVE S TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS:
,h
LUCIA A. DOUCHE
City Attorne
JEM/wpc/pb/B0 87
85-81_2
_N
IN
1
T_
Ir4TF_s: c't rk F Ric;
Ralph G. Ongie
City Clerk
Attn: Sylvia
Lowman
uty
s
City Clerk
d..axwe
Joel1TAssiCity
Attorney
August 13, 1985
Resolution No. 85-812
City Commission Meeting of July
25th, 1985.
Attached hereto is an amended Resolution No. 85-812, which you have been waiting
for. This new Resolution carries a date in the left-hand corner of August 13th,
1985. It should be substituted in lieu of the one presently in your possession.
Certified copies should be mailed to affected individuals and agencies, as set
out on page six.
Please send me an executed copy as well for my records so that I may send a copy
with explanations to the attorney that picked up a prior copy prior to its being
withdrawn.
JEM:ia
Attachment
a
1
1
i
3
r-
August 9, 1985
Michael Garretson, Director
Florida Department of Community Affairs
Division of Local Resource Management
2571 Executive Center Circle East
Tallahassee, Florida 32301
RE: CLAUGHTON ISLAND PROJECT -
LOW INCOME HOUSING
Dear Mr. Garretson
Enclosed herein please find a certified copy of Reso-
lution No. 85-812, passed and adopted by the City of
Miami Commission at its meeting_ held on July 25, 1985,
which is self-explanatory.
RGO: smm
Enc. a/s
Very truly yours,
LPH 3. ONGIE
City Clerk
■
50
^1
August 9, 1985
Barry Peterson, Director
South Florida Regional Planning Council
3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 140
Hollywood, Florida 33021
RE: CLAUGHTON ISLAND PROJECT -
LOW INCOME HOUSING
Dear Mr. Peterson:
Enclosed herein please find a certified copy of Reso-
lution No. 85-812, passed and adopted by the City of
Commission at its meeting held on July 25, 1983,
which is self-explanatory
Very truly yours,
Rr►'�LPH G . ONGI E
City Clerk
RGO:smm
Enc. a/s
"N
August 9, 1985
Mr. Edward Claughton
777 Brickel Avenue, Suite 1130
Miami, Florida 33131
RE: CLAUGHTON ISLAND PROJECT -
LOW INCOME HOUSING
Dear Mr. Claughton:
Enclosed herein please find a certified copy of Reso-
lution No. 85-812, passed and adopted by the City of
Miami Commission at its meeting held on July 25, 1985,
which is self-explanatory.
e'er truly yours,
,-
G. O..GIE
City Clerk
RGO.smm
Enc. a/s
cio
1�
August 9, 1985
Mr. Charles Juengling
Swire Properties, Inc.
777 Brickell Avenue
Miami, Florida 33131
RE: CLAUGHTON ISLAND PROJECT -
LOW INCOME HOUSING
Dear Mr. Juengling:
Enclosed herein please find a certified copy of Reso-
lution No. 85-812, passed and adopted by the City of
Miami Commission at its meeting held on Jule 25, 1985,
which is self-explanatory.
Very truly yours,
'='Ve 4t.�
RALPH G. ONGIE�
City Clerk
r
August 9, 1985
Charles K. Cheezem, President
Cheezems Investment Corporation
777 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1116
Miami, Florida 33131
RE: CLAUGHTON ISLAND PROJECT -
LOW INCOME HOUSING
Dear Pr. Cheezem:
Enclosed herein please find a certified copy of Reso-
lution No. 85-812, passed and adopted by the City of
Miami Commission at its meeting held on July 25, 1985,
which is self-explanatory.
Very truly yours,
�LP---11 G. ONGIE
City Clerk
RGO : smm
Enc. a/s
August 9, 1985
Robert Traurig, Esq.
GREENBERG,TRAURIG,ASKEII
HOFFMAN,LIPOFF,ROSEN &
QUENTEL, P.A.
1401 Brickell Avenue
Miami, Florida 33131
RE: CLAUGHTON ISLAND PROJECT -
LOW INCOME HOUSING
Dear Mr. Traurig:
Enclosed herein please find a certified copy of Reso-
lution No. 85-812, passed and adopted by the City of
Miami Commission at its meeting held on July 25, 1985,
which is self-explanatory.
Very truly yours,
LPH G. ONGIE
City Clerk
RGO : smm
Enc. a/s
MAO
-�& 0
M--7� (��q W
August 27, 1985
Mr. Charles h. ut,ttaeiu
President
Cheezems Investment Corporation
777 Brickell Avenue, Ste. 1116
Miami, Florida 33131
RE: CLAUGHTON ISLAND MODIFICATIONS
Dear Mr. Cheezem:
PA.Pri t. C)tiC,if
C CIF'.'o
VATTt NIRAI
Ate eta'' Cyr, Cit'r1
DEPI Tt CITv CIEP,k5
Ruhert E T�Rt
vrOP-
1, r. ;,,, i rnor•
Enclosed herein please find a copy of Resolution No. 85-812,
passed and adopted by the City of Miami Commission at its meeting
held on July 25, 1985, which is self explanatory.
On behalf of the City of Miami, thank you for your attention.
Ver truly yours,
Ra ph G. Ongie
City Clerk
RGO:sl
ENC: a/s
I
t
1
OFFICE Of TNf CM Clfk►, Crt, Hill 3506 Pn•41"Wrl(ar1 OI$.f- PC) h, s 330'0h kl,otr f1 id., 32:i. 0---� i; r'..,..
■
N
Mq
col W---uffE091
August 27, 1985
PA,[11}4 C. 011C!F
C:r, C--6
MATT' WRA1I
ASS'Sid- C I', C lerk
DEPLTI CIT1 CLERKS
Robe" E Tin¢ r•,
G p n-F, a M L,^_r
M %lendoza
E,r•.. P!...
LONr^,d
pvC,P-
Mr. Michael Garretson
Director
Florida Department of Veteran and Community Affairs
Division of Local Resource Management
2571 Executive Center Circle East
Tallahassee, Florida 32301
RE: CLAUGHTON ISLAND MODIFICATIONS
Dear Mr. Garretson:
Enclosed herein please find a copy of Resolution No. 85-812,
passed and adopted by the City of Miami Commission at its meeting
held on July 25, 1985, which is self explanatory.
On behalf of the City of Miami, thank you for your attention.
r trulypy'ours,
1:1;acr� Q`� .
R 1ph G. Ongie
City Clerk
RGO:sl
ENC: a/s
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK Cil► Hall 3500 Par, gmeric an Kris P 0 H . i30'08 kildmi Florida 33:33-0'0b i305 5"9-f.irt >
R 4i m C11,G'F
C:rk
ti14TH;P,1T� 1
its>s+a^> Cm Cle�l
DEPITt CIT1 CLERK5
Robcrr E Trng'r-,
Ge:k•c , M L- e
E-h F ' . R
51 •eLug~a
STeFF�F-
August 27, 1985
Mr. Barry Peterson
Director
South Florida Regional Planning Council
3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 140
Hollywood, Florida 33021
RE: CLAUGHTON ISLAND MODIFICATIONS
Dear Mr. Peterson:
Enclosed herein please find a copy of Resolution No. 85-812,
passed and adopted by the City of Miami Commission at its meeting
held on July 25, 1985, which is self explanatory.
On behalf of the City of Miami, thank you for your attention.
V truly yours,
R 1ph G. Ongie
City Clerk
RGO:sl
ENC: a/s
i
OFFICE OF THE CIT1 CLERK Cad Hall 3500 Pan A�•neri<an Drf%v P 0 Hn. 330'C!8 Miami, Flunda 33233.070b J05 5.'9-6,'W,71
1 rnLRUfflut-r,
August 27, 1985
Mr. Edward on
777 Brickell Avenue
Suite 1130
Miami, Florida 33131
RE: CLAUGHTON ISLAND MODIFICATIONS
R Al ro C O .f,!E
Cts Ce'k
M A4TT� HIR Ai
Ass stet Cts Uerk
DEPL TV CITt CLERKS
Rnh(•' E Ttrs'e�
Ceo'Rie M L;t6v
Ssls,a ti+ tilend�,7a
E,o'•, G, ;n
Luvsr+a-
STAFF c' r'F''-)FT
L I e - D:. loon
Dear Mr. Claughton:
Enclosed herein please find a copy of Resolution No. 85-812,
passed and adopted by the City of Miami Commission at its meeting
held on July 25, 1985, which is self explanatory.
On behalf of the City of Miami, thank you for your attention.
Very truly yours,
R 1ph G. Ongie
City Clerk
RGO:sl
ENC: a/s
OFFICE Of THE C1T1 CLERK Crh Hale 35Cx7E'a+ 4Mrrirar E)r,.e' PO E3,u 330'u8 Miam. Honda 33233.0'(k i3(-° 5'4-i.r ,
s
1
CW @0 ff MEMO-,
August 27, 1985
P. A., r'H C, (")',C'F
( r, C 4-1,
VATT1 HIR�i
1sststarI Cyr. Cle•1
DEPLTY CITY CLERKS
Ruben E TmQ(rs
Geor¢a M. little
Ssi„a 's1 11en�cra
E.P`,o kry
Lo-%.ran
rTA.FF SF PPORT
l: a' D,'i—C, r.
Mr. Charles Juengling
Swire Properties. Tnc.
777 Brickell Avenue
Miami, Florida 33131
RE: CLAUGHTON ISLAND MODIFICATIONS
Dear Mr. Juengling:
Enclosed herein please find a copy of Resolution No. 85-812,
passed and adopted by the City of Miami Commission at its meeting
held on July 25, 1985, which is self explanatory.
On behalf of the City of Miami, thank you for your attention.
Very truly yours,
�M�7
R 1ph G. Ongie
City Clerk
RGO:sl
ENC: a/a
OFFICE OF THE CITY CEERk Ctrs Hall , 3500 Pan Arnenrar, Dr,.e PO Box 330'1k Miami. Honda 33233-0'0E 1305 5'S hCN;
CITY OF MIAMI
CITY CLERK REPORTS
MEETING DATE: July 18, 1985
PAGE NO. 3
ION THAT, IN CONNECTION WITH A PROPOSED RESOLUTION
PROVIDING CLAUGHTON ISLAND DEVELOPERS WITH OPTIONS IN
CONNECTION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF UNITS IN THE CITY'S
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TARGET AREAS, THE CITY COMMISSION
STIPULATES AS FOLLOWS:
1. THE CITY WILL NOT ACCEPT ANY MONEY IN LIEU OF THE
HOUSING PROMISED BY R-75-423 AND M-85-340;
2. CLAUGHTON ISLAND DEVELOPERS WILL HAVE THE OPTION OF:
a) DEVELOPING 200 UNITS OF PERMANENT LOW RENT HOUSING
ON CLAUGHTON ISLAND (WITH RENTS BEING DETERMINED VIA
CPI)
b) DEVELOPING 225 UNITS OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING
RESTRICTING THE UNITS TO BE DIVIDED BETWEEN THREE
AREAS WITHIN THE CITY OF MIAMI;
3. NONE OF THE HOUSING OFF THE ISLAND WILL BE BUILT IN
THE OVERTOWN/PARK WEST AREA IN ORDER TO SPREAD AROUND
DEVELOPMENTS IN OTHER AREAS OF THE CITY;
4. TIME PARAMETERS FOR COMMENCEMENT AND COMPLETION TO BE
DISCUSSED AT MEETING PRESENTLY SCHEDULED FOR JULY 25,
1985.
NOTEFOR THE RECORD: R-85-743 reappointed Skip Chavez
and Al Gilford to the Private Industry Council (PIC) of
South Florida.
NOTE FOR THE RECORD: R-85-744 appointed the following
individuals to the Miami Waterfront Board: Daniel Kipnis,
Michael Chenoweth, Henry Gibbons, Ted Slack.
NOTE FOR THE RECORD: R-85-745 appointed the following
individuals to the Heritage Conservation Board: Albert
Perez, Jay Hirsch, Arthur King, Sr.
NOTE FOR THE RECORD: Items 74 and 75 for appointments to
the Zoning Board and the Planning Advisory Board were
continued to the next meeting.
A MOTION CONTINUING CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED CONFIRMING
ORDERING RESOLUTION FOR WEST LITTLE HAVANA HIGHWAY
IMPROVEMENT - PHASE I (H-4510) STIPULATING THAT: THE
ADMINISTRATION SHALL MAKE SURE THAT ALL CONCERNED PARTIES
BEP40TIFIED AGAIN IN BOTH ENGLISH AND SPANISH; THAT NEXT
TIME THIS ISSUE BE SCHEDULED IN THE EVENING PORTION OF
THE AGENDA; AND THAT PRIOR TO THE TIME THIS ISSUE COMES
BACK FOR CONSIDERATION THE ADMINISTRATION SHALL HOLD A
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING IN THE AREA IN ORDER TO BETTER
INFORM THE NEIGHBORS.
A MOTION STIPULATING THE POLICY OF THE CITY COMMISSION IN
CONNECTION WITH CITY FESTIVALS AS FOLLOWS:
1. THAT IF NEXT YEAR'S POLICY NOT TO FUND FESTIVALS IS
CHANGED, THAT ALL GROUPS MUST BE AFFORDED ON AN EQUAL
BASIS THE OPPORTUNITY TO COME BEFORE THE COMMISSION TO
MAKE THEIR PRESENTATION AND MAKE THEIR REQUEST;
2. THAT ALL SUCH GROUPS SHALL BE INVITED AT THE SAME
TIME;
3. THAT IF SAID POLICY IS CHANGED, AS ABOVE STATED, ANY
CITY -SPONSORED OR EVENTS CO -SPONSORED BY THE CITY SHALL
BE GIVEN PRIORITY; AND LASTLY
4. REQUESTING THE CITY MANAGER TO REVIEW THIS ISSUE AND
TO COME BACK WITH HIS RECOMMENDATIONS.
A MOTION STIPULATING THAT IN CONNECTION WITH THE REQUEST
RECEIVED FROM REPRESENTATIVES OF F.I.U. MEN'S BASKETBALL
TEAM FOR FUNDING TO ASSIST THEM WITH THEIR PROJECTED TRIP
TO DENMARK, THE CITY OF MIAMI SHALL PAY UP TO 20% OF THE
REQUESTED MONIES, WHICH IS THEIR FAIR SHARE OF CITY
CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE T.D.C. MONIES, IF THIS GROUP CAN GET
METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY TO CONTRIBUTE THE BALANCE.
M-85-722
MOVED: Dawkins
SECOND: Plummer
ABSENT: Carollo
& Perez
M-85-747
MOVED: Plummer
SECOND: Dawkins
ABSENT: Carollo
M-85-758
MOVED: Plummer
SECOND: Dawkins
ABSENT: Carollo
M-85-759
MOVED: Ferre
SECOND: Dawkins
ABSENT: Carollo
& Perez
v ",5- V o.1-1
J
`O CITY OF MIAMI• FLORIDA
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
L
TO Jorge Santiago -Ventura DATE June 6, 1985 FILE •
Building Official
Building b Zoning Division SUBJECT Bri ckel 1 Key on
Fire, Rescue 3 Inspection Service Dept. Claughton Island/Claughton Island
FROM REFERENCES
S o odri guez, Di rector
Wing Department ENCLOSURES
This memorandum is to advise you of the current status of the Claughton Island
Development Order pertaining to low-income housing and to recommend to you
that no further building permits be issued until the developers are in
substantial compliance with the Development Order.
Chapter 380.06 (15) Florida Statutes provides that:
"(15) The local government issuing the development order is
r primarily responsible for monitoring the development and enforcing
the provisions of the development order. Local governments shall
not issue any permits or approvals or provide any extensions of
services if the developer fails to act in substantial compliance
with the development order"
The current status of the Development Order pertaining to low-income
housing is as follows:
1. The Development Order and attached February 1975
agreements were issued obligating the developer
to provide 200 units of low-income housing on the
Island in 10 years.
2. Resolution 84-1496 was adopted, extending the December 20, 1984
low-income housing obligation from February 12,
1985 to March 28, 1985.
3. Motion 85-340, a motion of intent, was passed, March 28, 1985
stating that if moderate income or affordable
housing units are built on the mainland they are
to be built ready for occupancy 18 months from
this date, stipulating that the units shall be in
3 separate buildings of 75 units per building in
3 separate areas of the City.
85-812
This Department finds that the developers' obligation to provide low-income
housing on Claughton Island was not satisfied by March 28, 1985, and that the
developer is not in substantial compliance with the terms of the Development
Order and attached agreements.
This Department recommends that no further building permits be issued pending
further action on the part of the developer to resolve his obligation. Our
understanding was that this obligation was to be resolved through discussion
and passage of a formal resolution at the City Commission meeting of May 23,
1985. Therefore, this Department rescinds our previous support of your
issuance of a foundation permit as explained in the paragraph on the second
page of the attached letter to Mr. Anthony J. O'Donnell, Jr. dated May 20,
1985.
Reference is also made to this Department's understanding of other developer
obligations pertaining to fire and police protection and traffic improvements.
SR/JWM/td
Attachment
cc: Anthony J. O'Donnell, Jr.
Greenberg, Traurig, Askew, Hoffman
Lipoff, Rosen and Quentel
Edward Claughton
Claughton Island Company
Walter Pierce
Asst. City Manager
David H. Teems, Deputy Chief
Building and Zoning Division
Fire, Rescue b Inspection Services Dept.
85-812.
- 2 -
.14
(I
CI-Y OF MIAMI. FLORIDA
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 10'.
-- The Honorable Mayor and Members =ArE July 15, 1985 WILE
of the City Commission
5..9:E= RESOLUTION - RECOMMEND APPROVAL
CLAUGHTON ISLAND
AMENDMENTS TO DEVELOPMENT ORDER
Sergio P e r e i -`�`QE� _
E'
C i ty Manager �� COMMISSION AGENDA - J ULY 25, 1985
i PLANNING AND ZONING ITEMS
It is recommended by the Planning Advisory
Board that amendments to paragraph B of
the Stipulafif—o—nof Agreement to Condition
Development Order and to Dismiss Appeal,
Resolution 75-423, April 22, 1975 and
paragraphs 1 and 5, Attachment I,
Memorandum or Understanding between
Claughton Island Investors and the City of
Miami, dated May 14, 1975, in reference to
Low Income Housing, pertaining to number,
location and time of completion of the
construction be approved.
The Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of July 10, 1985, Item 2,
following an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution PAB 43-85 by a 7 to 1
vote, recommending approval of amendments to paragraph 6, Exhibit "A",
Resolution 75-135, February 12, 1975, as amended, being a Development Order,
approving with modifications the Claughton Island project, a Development of
Regional Impact, amending paragraph B of the Stipulation of Agreement to
Condition Development Order and to Dismiss Appeal, Resolution 75-423, April
22, 1975; amending paragraphs 1 and 5, Attachment I, Memorandum of
Understanding between Claughton Island Investors and the City of Miami in
reference to Low Income Housing, dated May 14, 1975, which amendments provide
that, a) if the units are built on Claughton Island, 200 low income units
shall be constructed ready for occupancy within eighteen (18) months or b) if
the units are built off the Island, 225 moderate income affordable housing
units shall be constucted in three buildings of 75 units each, in three
separate areas of the City of Miami, subject to the approval of the City
Commission, specifying that the units shall be completed, ready for occupancy,
within eighteen (18) months; declaring that the City Commission will not
accept money in lieu of construction; and further, consideration of a finding
of no substantial deviation regarding the above amendments.
Two proponents present at the meeting.
Backup information is included for your review.
85-812
The Honorable Mayor and Members Page 2
r of the City Commission
A RESOLUTION to provide for the above has been prepared by the City Attorney's
Office and submitted for consideration of the City Commission.
AEPL:III
cc: Law Department
NOTE: Planning Department recommends: APPROVAL
l
t
'I
i
0 0
2
PLANNING FACT SHEET
APPLICANT Swire Biscayne Inc., Cheezem Investment
Corporation, Edward IN. Claughton, Jr., and
Suzanne C. Matthews
January 10, 1985
PETITION 2. CLAUGHTON ISLAND
All 0
BRICKELL KEY ON CLAUGHTON
ISLAND "SECTION ONE" (113-28)
All of
BRICKELL KEY ON CLAUGHTON
ISLAND "SECTION NO" (118-47)
All of
BRICKELL KEY ON CLAUGHTON ISLAND
"SECTION THREE" (119-70)
and UNPLATTED LAND within the
bulkhead line
less that property shown in
Official Records 11344 at page
1079-1334
Per Motion 85-340, March 28, 1985, pertaining to
number, location and time of completion of the
construction of low income housing,
consideration of amendments to paragraph 6,
Exhibit "A", Resolution 75-135, February 12,
1975, as amended, being a Development Order,
approving with modifications the Claughton
Island project, a Development of Regional
Impact, amending paragraph B of the Stipulation
of Agreement to Condition Development Order and
to Dismiss Appeal, Resolution 75-423, April 22,
1975; amending paragraphs 1 and 5, Attachment I,
Memorandum of Understanding between Claughton
Island Investors and the City of Miami in
reference to Low Income Housing, dated May 14,
1975, which amendments provide that, a) if the
units are built on Claughton Island, 200 tow
income units shall be constructed ready for
occupancy within eighteen (18) months or b) if
the units are built off the Island-, 225 moderate
income affordable housing units shall be
constucted in three buildings of 75 units each,
in three separate areas of the City of Miami,
subject to the approval of the City Commission,
specifying that the units shall be completed,
PAB 7/10/85
Item 02
Page 1
85-812
_
0 0
ee
ready for occupancy, within eighteen (18)
months; declaring that the City Commission will
not accept money in lieu of construction; and
further, consideration of a finding of no
substantial deviation regarding the above
amendments.
REQUEST To consider certain amendments to the Claughton
Island Development Order pertaining to number,
tenure, location and time of completion of
housing units; and considering a finding of no
substantial deviation.
BACKGROUND On March 28, 1985, the City Commission
considered a 5 month time extension for the
developer to construct 200 low income units on
Claughton Island.
ANALYSIS
The Commission passed a motion of intent -
Motion 85-340; March 23, 1985 as follows:
"A MOTION DECLARING THE INTENT OF THE CITY
COMMISSION CONCERNING THE EXTENSION OF TIME TO
AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER AND THE APPEAL
CONCERNING THE OBLIGATION OF SWIRE BISCAYNE,
INC., CHEEZEM INVESTMENT CORP., AND EDWARD N.
CLAUGHTON, JR., & SUZANNE C. MATTHEWS TO
CONSTRUCT UNITS OF HOUSING BY DECLARING THAT THE
CITY COMMISSION WILL ACCEPT NO MONIES FROM
DEVELOPER OF CLAUGHTON ISLAND BUT RATHER
STIPULATING THAT MODERATE INCOME OR AFFORDABLE
HOUSING UNITS IF BUILT ON THE MAINLAND SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED AND READY FOR OCCUPANCY EIGHTEEN
MONTHS FROM THIS DATE; FURTHER STIPULATING THAT
THE UNITS SHALL BE DIVIDED IN THREE SEPARATE
BUILDINGS OF 75 UNITS PER BUILDING, IN THREE
SEPARATE AREAS OF THE CITY TO BE SPECIFICALLY
IDENTIFIED AS TO LOCATION AT A LATER DATE."
On the advice of the Law Department, these
changes are being brought back as proposed
amendments to the Claughton Island Development
Order.
Separately, the Planning Department has prepared
a memorandum containing the Planning
Departments' understanding of the developers
commitments for Claughton Island.
(see attachment: Analysis)
PAB 7/10/85
Item 42
Page 2
:.
85-812 1
RECOMMENDATIONS
PLANNING DEPT. Approval of the attached draft resolution,
clarifying tenure, changing location, increasing
the number and specifying time of completion of
housing
PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD At its meeting of July 10, 1985, the Planning
Advisory Board adopted Resolution PAB 43-85
by a 1 to 1 vote, recommending approval of the
above.
t
PAB 7/10/85
Item *2
Page 3
i
I
4
i
i
11
A.
.0
tjAl "O�
I g�-7r
4d
IS5-slolI
-
S 7. Dn�rr
VTR- FFi�'� �EMOR �NOU�
k
Planning Advisory Board
r odriguez, Director
Pla-nning Department
July 10, 1985 =:LE
Analysis of Proposed Amendments:
Low or moderate income housing
Claughton Island Development Order
Analysis
The City Commission Motion of intent (Motion 85-340; Parch 28, 1985) stated
~ that if the units were to be built on the Mainland:
-- the number of units would be increased from 200 to 225
-- they would be located three separate buildings of 75 units each in
three separate areas
-- they must be completed in 18 months
-- moderate income affordable housing, rather than low-income housing,
would be built.
The Planning Department finds that there is no substantial deviation and has
prepared draft legislation to amend the Development Order to achieve the
intent of the motion. The changes would not transfer the units from Claughton
Island to the mainland; rather the developers ers could substitute market -rate
units, within the 3,07E housing unit cap for the island. This su stitution of
market -rate housing, for low income housing, would probably result in slightly
11 higher traffic generation but overall Claughton Island traffic and open space
impacts would remain substantially the same. Creation of 225 moderate income
housing units on the mainland achieves the same social objectives as the
original Development Order as demonstrated by the report "Urban League of
Greater Miami Report on Developer Obligations for Low Income Housing in Miami _
and Feasible Alternative Applications of the Obligation of the Claughton
Island Development Investors," prepared by the Urban League of Greater Miami
Inc. in 1984 (attached). The impact of an additional 225 units of moderate
income affordable housing on the mainland would augment the affordable housing
market and -make Miami more attractive for moderate income families; the impact
of traffic would likely be dispersed. The loss of 200 units of low income
housing has a localized impact on this segment of the Miami housing market as
little other low income housing is being built locally. However, the Planning
Department does not believe that the provision of local low income housing
should fall exclusively within the jurisdiction of the City of Miami. None of
these proposed changes to the previously approved Development Order create the
reasonable likelihood of additional adverse regional impacts, or any other
regional impacts which have not been previously reviewed by the regional
planning council.
pole Page 1 of 2
�i
E
WRI
0
Planning Advisory Board July 10, 1985
The income levels of occupants to be accommodated in the mainland housing need
to be clearly understood as the terms are separate and distinct, as follows:
Very low income = less than 50% of median income
Low income = 51-800 of median income
Moderate = 81-120% of median income
Affordable (low income) = rent limited to 30* of gross income for low
income families
Affordable (moderate) = rent limited to 301 of gross income for
moderate income families
Note: Median income is $25,150 for a family of four in Rade County.
SR/JWM/mv
f
10'
Page 2 of 2
85-812
f -%
-0 planning Advisory Board
CITY OF MIAMI. FLORIOA
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
GATE July 10, 1985
VILE
Additional information: Cl auahton
island - Planning Departments
Understanding ofDevelopers Commitments
ARCM i DEFERE`ICES Planning Department Memorandum:
odriguez, Director May 1, 1985
/Planning Department=y�LosuREs
Since the preparation of the Planning Department memorandum of May 1, 1985, the
following letters have been received:
1. Letter from Anthony J. O'Donnell, Attorney for Swire
BiscayneInc.: May ZU. 1985
' The letter (2nd page, 2nd paragraph) states that: "the
Claughton interests would be obligated to pay for 22 percent
of their (specific surface street traffic) improvements and
the remaining Brickell Key development would be obligated to
pay 78 percent. The latest estimate we have for these
(specific surface street traffic) improvements is S37,000".
(Material in parentheses added by Planning Department:
specific street traffic improvements refers only to various
median improvements on Brickell Avenue between 7th & 8th
Streets.)
2. Letter from Tishman
Company: June 1,
Speyer Properties/Lincoln Pro
The information in the letter can be summarized as follows:
1. The total cost of the surface street
traffic improvements on Brickell Avenue, S.
E. 8th Street and Sayshore Drive is. . . . . . . $403,008
Page 1 of 2
�..�.--..+.��a..�--ter• a-�,+r.-.�,o.�.r=�r..�.�,x.. # ;�`J��,„'�� �.�iac, esa� _ _ _. _ _ _ __
Planning Advisory Board July 10, 1985
2. 'he original estimate, per Development
Orders, including cost escalation over 1983
is . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $354,250
3. The Tishman Speyer/Equitable share (1/3 of
S354,250) is . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S118,083
4. The Lincoln/Nasher share (2/3 of $354,250)
is . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S236,161
5. The balance to be funded is . . . . . . . . . . S 48,758
It should be emphasized (in line 4 above) that the Lincoln/Nasher share is 2/3
of the original estimate. The City of Miami has no obligation for any part oT
the project cost; the two Developments of Regional —Impact are obligated for the
original estimate (plus escalation) of S354,250.
SR/JM/rj
Attachments
Page 2 of 2
65-812 1
49
6.AW CrriCES
GREEN®ERG, TRAURiG, ASKEW, HOFFMAN, LIPOFr, ROSEN a OUENTEL. C .A 0
_ ':A -C:eD :- •O.ED
_ANw/NCt S 300CS4
• _-AE_ _ -.BE-3- NC
-A ---CH a 300SC `.
e•DCN .'. DC-[DSCN
:t3.0 _ _..0t2
T
«E-,N N 30CENaENS
rt•t_
.,Rea- O ON
.OAc�CN
-Am.- SDCCNSIA--
OA.E s DCC NE__A
0 :_.0: • AD. N
D=et D- _ GROSSMAN
N.C-O.AS DCCAWC..
DE_a N S.C.
SAD. « _C_O
-AD,-% S DCStN
_.DC SASS
_ADD-_-orr«AN
40NA-3 « wOStNGAD-cN
IS --AN . aENICwO
•wN-.= « -ArrCe
OA. = , DOSS
..AD. e._-`•
«AD- N .Ale
OAV-O a a0we
e_D- eD _-�•,
OCOED' A .AD --AN
S-t/tN - SAM—AN
-.,reCWC A SC ---AN
*Coca, . e.D_ NG-:N
•_AN a •OS_C�'
«•w. SC..W«Ew
A,A% a C-ASE
S-E.CN
AD- N a S1.ADJ0
S.E - :COS
S-tVtN A .ANO-
«AD6ENt 4 91IVCDYAN
-CNCA,- a :Crre.
S-EVt% a _ADIOuS
ST.AD- - SINGED
«•w. a =A. S
..AN S .EOt DA•AM
T'«OT• SN.T«
D•f.E_ _ _ AL
.♦WDCNCC a .0 V-
0AN.C"«r • Su ..AN
A -AN - . Co
NCD«AN - _u0rr
rCDet D- •• S6.SM'N
C-•--ES N tMCAD y
SCAM, O . 09ON
•O6ANOA 6•[_60N'AOArA
3•D. « CDS-E'N
:AWACS t _=u• E-
CADC6-4 .. '..O..AS
- «AS - CO-C-S
,...AN w _Ou••�[-
DCato...-DAVD'G
w. —Aa,-„ S SAONE—
.±Lea f D".1 «A' NSM.
STANLel - WA.SM6AG
O•_ a. -Now
GDtGOD• A «ART-N
BONA --AN - WADNtD
_.WDCNCE rC701S•-
DCODC • AD••N
OAV.O « Wt_.S
._AN S 30.Z
..AN « «.'--E.
.6.'t A S W'6�'A«SON
_.O,E- A 3c_.-.VAN
A6 C • « «ODA.CS
�9000Lo • W.S.
S-E.EN r
.Cu3 NOS -DO
S-E�,EN «�,p.Os« --
•NT-ON• .. O OONNt....0
May 20, 1985
HAND DEI,I': ER_rD
Joe McManus
Assistant Director
City of Miami Planning Department
Third Floor
275 N.F.. Second Street
"-A.
'ari, Florida 33123
Re: Swire Biscayne, Inc. - Brickell Key
Police, Fire and Traffice Improvements
I
Dear Mr. McManus:
eD _•E_.--.NC=_DS
AC eD ].r-_ A.EN_E
«,A«. '�=M =A 33 3
-T_ED-CNES
ONCWA00.3C: S23 a
-[.ta 9C 3,24
-t,tCCD• 3C5 5'9 C' B
34C C�E..A- S S-ott-
WES- 0A6.« OEAC- r_=D OA 33DC
.3,S5 1359 03333
WD,-tD S O-OCC- NC
579-0603
Pursuant to our meeting of April 30, 1985, and subsequent
telephone discussions, this letter summarizes the position of
Swire Biscayne, Inc. with respect to police, fire and traffic
improvements related to Brickell Key.
1. Police. The Police Department requirements for an
8 x 10 foo�ice and telephone together with two narking
spaces is an obligation which will be met by Swire Biscayne,
Inc. on Brickell Key with locations being changed from time to
time to accommodate development (subject to Police Department
approval of each new location).
2. Fire. The Fire Department requirements for Brickell
Key were set forth on the "Fire Access Study Brickell.Key"
(last revised on September 11, 1979) which the Fire Department
IL
r
q of
..
f
ce ",c.!ar. �s
gip, 1983
?a --a Two
ac=roved by letter dated September 26, 1979 (see attached). This
approved plan expressly provides that "a Fire Denartnent Station
on the Island is not required." The other obligations set forth
in the plan, including a means of access on the bulkhead and a
vehicular access plan approved by the Fire Denar"ment will be
provided.
3. Traffic. The specific traffic improvements agreed to by
the predecessors in title to Claughton Island are set forth in the
attached letter of An_ril 1, 1975, signed by Frates Properties, Inc.
and Claughton Island Company, and include various median improve-
ments between 7th Street and 8th Street on Brickell Avenue. As
we discussed, the Claughton interests would be obligated to pay
for 22 percent of these improvements and the remaining Brickell Key
development would be obligated to pay 78 percent. The latest esti-
mate we have for these improvements is $37,000.
We trust that the above summary comports with your understand-
i^c of these issues. If you have any questions or need further
infor^ation, please feel free to call on me. Thank you again for
•:our time and efforts in resolving this Natter.
` Sincerely yours,
ANTHONY J . 0' DON:•:ELL , R .
AJO:vc
Encs .
bcc: Mr. Charles Juengling w/Encs.
Mr. Stephen Owens w/Encs.
Robert H. Traurig, Esq. w/Encs.
Matthew B. Gorson, Esq. w/Encs.
Clifford A. Schulman, Esq. w/Encs.
I
:►.
Gactmeena, TRAURIG, ASKew, HOrrMAN, LIPOrr. ROSem & OUCNTCL, P A.
r
85-812 !;
�`,3*�u;c�e �r �icrrri, irirector
Cept-:t.', ert of Traffic the Treiraportctioh
t,8 5 r girth -est U street suite 201
Clau-Non Wind =
Your letter dated March 10., 1075
�' ar S;r, Simm.- , �s
letter is to clarity our 1:1tentio-1 to pay for the irt,provef:-.erts
te) the rr a 6*f'At: hetween "tt: t-treet eh�i 6th street ,or. 1 ricitell Avenue
as o=atlimed by our traffic enginc era, Alan Voorhees and AsLocivtea,,.
Lic► in our traffic analysis heretofore furnished to your office,
is felt tt it t*eee irrprove-e»ts are a tui.,11v rtq, a
to A ort ing V• it'i yioi, 'ar.! your staji to wort: out
y; ....
1 ,ct•i1=
cone, erninb o::r upcorrirg modifications to our w..aster plan for Claughton
Islan9, please be assured that it is very much our intention to work
{-it6 you" office in atten- pting to develop the test solution fo::.11 concerned
with regar.: to a possible bascule bridge that cotild extend from the
rr: airlanrl o. the north to' Clau;hton Island:'
r _ Sincerely yours.'
j Frates 'rro - M tes, Inc. Claughton Island Company
rx, by, NoLert C. Foe by: h. Cla gt.ton
" ` RCP: Fti C:brl
Viz:
"I l t
- P
F
Z
' 3 ;
r
r
k
�M 'r f -
u
I
a2w(gemulm
September 26, 1979
Mr. Vernon 0. Moorer
RTKL Associates, Inc.
Village of Cross Keys
Baltimore, Maryland 21210
Dear Mr. Moorer:
Re: Fire Access at Brickell Key
JOSEPH R. CRASSIE
Cloy Manager
In response to your memo dated 11 September 1979, regarding fire access
study with options, all applicable considerations have been reviewed, and
are acceptable as interpreted.
Please note, however, exact locations of pre -positioned fire -fighting equip-
ment, for townhouses must still be determined.
If there are further questions regarding the above, advise directly.
Very truly yours,
7
�A •.
OjFire
R.Calpini Departm t Representative
0. H. eems, Fire Marshal
Chief of Fire Prevention
cc: P. Sweeney
J. Genuardi
OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL
BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION 3342 Pan Mnencan Orive/P.O. 8os 330MMianu, Florida 33133/S794307
r{
E
ATKL Associates ix Architecture Ptann.ng•UrOan Design Engineering The vduage Sauare 'village of Ci css Keys 9a timOre Ma 11110 t 301 , a3S600G
September 11, 1979
Mr. John Calpini
Bureau of Fire Prevention
P. 0. Box 330708
Miami, Florida 33133
Dear Mr. Calpini:
Re: Brickell Key/Claughton Island
Phase I
Please find enclosed "Fire Access Study - Brickell Key Buildings 1-2-3"
dated September 11, 1979, which records our understanding of the Fire
Department requirements for the initial three (3) phases of the referenced
project development.
Confirmation is hereby requested of the enclosed document for the initial
three (3) phases recognizing that as the planning for the balance of the
development becomes more specific, the Fire Access Plan for these future
areas will continue to be jointly reviewed with your department to
a
affect a fully integrated Master Fire Department Access Plan.
We appreciate your department's joint effort in the development of the
documented plan and look forward to your continued cooperation in the
future.
Sincerely,
RTKL Associ es Inc.
rnon D. Moorer, AIA, CS
Principal
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Charles Cheezem
Mr. Ken Cheezem
•won> Mr. Graham Cook
Mr. Charles Lamb
Mr. Yui Hay Lee
Mr. Charles Juengling
r,
W
TishmanSpeyer
June 7, 1985
Certified Mail
7 " ?nCkcq Avenue
Qiam, clonW 33131
f305 372 500
co
Mr. Joseph W. McManus
City of Miami Planning Department 1�
275 Nty 2nd Avenue. _ 0
liami, Florida 33131 — Cn
Re: ;Major Special Use Permit Dated July 28, 1983 =:x W 0
for Tishman Speyer/Equitable c
Major Special Use Permit Dated Sept. 29, 1983 �
for Lincoln Property/hasher
Dear Mr. McManus:
The undersigned are required to do certain road work on Brickell
Avenue, SE 8th Street, and Bayshore Drive as outlined in their Major
Special Use Permits referenced above.
The undersigned retained K.J. Ross do Company and Barton-Aschman
Associates to design the road work, roadway striping, signage, and
traffic light signalization consistent with the requirements of the
Major Special Use Permits. A complete set of their final plans are
enclosed with this letter.
During the design process, the engineers met on several occasions with
representatives of the City of Miami Public Works Department, Dade
County Department of Transportation and State of Florida Department of
Transportation. All comments by those various agencies were
incorporated into the final drawings. The permit is now ready to be
issued.
The undersigned put the plans out to bid and the low bidder was
Central Paving of Florida for a total price of $347,000, exclusive of
design fees totaling $439500 including supervision of construction,
and F.P.& L.'s charge for 6 new street lights $12,500, resulting in a
total project cost of $403,008.
The obligation of the undersigned is to pay one-third each of a total
maximum cost of $325,000 in 1983 dollars. Any difference is to be a
short term loan to the City of Miami upon terms mutually agreed upon.
The undersigned awarded the contract to Central Florida Equipment
Rentals, Inc. on June 5, 1985 and work will begin June 14, 1985.
It is understood that the City will have other developers or agencies
participate in the cost of the road work. To assist in those
discussions, the following is a breakdown of the major elements of the
project:
NEW YORK CHICAGO HOUSTON ATLANTA STAMFORD MIAMI BOCA RATON
i
9
't'
Mr. Joscph W. McManus
I City of ?Miami Planning Department
June 7 ,1985
Paoe Two
Engineering Design:
Plans, specifications,
$ 37,500
bid documents (H.J. Ross & Barton-Aschman)
—AADD
Supervision of construction
Total Design
Construction Bid:
Road Work (Central Florida Equipment Rentals, Inc.)
Brickell median - 7th Street to 8th Street
10,000
Balance of roadwork
_1124242
Total Road Work
_1$24242
Signage and striping
__121AM
Signalization
*7th Street and Brickell Avenue
369481
*8th Street and Brickell Avenue
489817
*S.E. 8th Street and Bayshore Drive
__42.40.1
Total Si;nalization
y. F.P. & L. Charge for 7 Lights
12,500
Landscaping
Total Construction Bid
Total Project Cost
_492�g4$
Original estimate per Major Special Use Permit -
$325,000
Increase over 1983 dollars 9%
_2$,2$9
Total revised estimate
354,250
TSP/Equitable share @ 1/3
1179965
Lincoln/hasher share @ 1/3
117,965
Amount to be advanced as a
loan to the City of Miami.
117,965
Balance to be funded by other
developers or by the City of Miami.
$ 480758
We appreciate your assistance in this matter. Please let
us know who
will handle the documentation of the loan with the City.
41
Sincerely,
�v
-----------
Tishman Speyer Properties
cc: Sergio Rodriguez
Richard Whipple
George Campbell
Lincoln Property Company
fi,
r-61
_;-.. Or Miami. F! OR'D4
W,
0
.NTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
Planning Advisory Board
k Ile
"c" Sergio Rodriguez, Dirdctor
Planning Department
May 1, 1985
en_E
Claughton Island - Planning
Department Understanding of
Developers Commitments on Claughton
Island
w_crOE' -ES
As a condition for permitting the developer to construct the required number
of low or moderate income housing units off the island, the Planning
Department recommends that certain developer commitments be formalized through
a proffer from the developers that is acceptable to the City Commission. The
E Planning Department's understanding of these commitments are as follows:
1. Park Improvements and Police Facilities
By letter of December 31, 1974 (ATTACHMENT A) the developers committed to:
-- an 8' x 10' office and two 8' x 20' parking spaces in proximity to the
office for use by the City of Miami Police Department; and
-- a 3.5 acre park, to be improved in the amount of S1. 5 million, to be
publicly accessible by permanent easement and to be maintained in
�f perpetuity by the developer.
# t�
2. Fire Facility
By letter of July 17, 1974, and a page - Section 4 (1) (a) of the
Application for Development in accordance with SPD-1 Central Island
District requirements for Claughton Island (ATTACHMENT B), the developer
committed to a fire facility.
3. Surface Street Improvements: SE 7th/9th Streets and B rickell Avenue
This Department has reviewed our files pertaining to the commitment of the
developers of Claughton Island for surface street improvements for the
intersections of SE 7th Street and SE 8th Street and Brickell Avenue.
Our research discloses the following:
1. The Application for Development Approval (January 23, 1974) contained
a traffic study prepared by Alan M. Voorhees and Associates Inc. We
have traffic studies on file prepared by Alan M. Voorhees and
Associates Inc. dated October, 1973; January, 1974; March, 1974; and
several letters between the then -Metro Dade County Department of
Traffic and Transportation and Alan M. Voorhees and Associates Inc.
`�� Page 1 of 2
Planning Advisory Board
I
May 1, 1985
extending through 1974. An excerpt, (ATTACHMENT ) pages 15-22 of the
March 1974 study by Alan M. Voorhees and Associates Inc. is attached
so that the level of detail and timing proposed may be appreciated.
In summary, the subject was not whether the traffic improvements
proposed in Alan M. Voorhees and Associates, Inc. reports were needed
and necessary but whether the proposed traffic improvements would
accommodate all the projected traffic at acceptable levels of service.
2. By letter of April 2, 1975, (ATTACHMENT D) the then -Metro Dade County
Department of Traffic and Transportation assured this Department that
the developers of Claughton Island had committed themselves to the
street modifications assumed in the traffic studies in 1 (above).
3. Per City Commission Resolution 75-423; April 22, 1975, a Memorandum of
Understanding and Stipulation of Agreement to Condition Development
Order and to Dismiss Appeal was authorized for execution. An 800
vehicle per peak hour traffic volume cap was instituted to resolve the
disagreement in 1 (above). The Stipulation (ATTACHMENT E) provided in
paragraphs (4 and 5) that if the developer proposes additional
transportation systems to meet the 800 vph cap, the developer will
contribute toward the cost of additional transportation systems;
provided that the developer would not be obligated `or these
additional costs unless the developer proposes development which would
exceed the 800 vph cap. A fair reading of the paragraphs shows that
the developers' obligation for the improvements 1 (above) is assumed;
the term "additional" refers to future proposed improvements which the
developers may proffer.
4. Per City Commission Resolution 80-790: October 30, 1980, (since
rescinded) (ATTACHMENT F) it was clear that cost participation by the
Claughton Island developers in surface street improvements was
assumed. Note also that by letter of October 16, 1980, the
participation of the Four Ambassadors property in signalization was
confirmed.
5. By copies of minutes of a meeting on February 6, 1981, and a letter to
Mr. Edward N. Claughton, Jr. dated March 25, 1981, (ATTACHMENT G) the
cost participation of the Claughton Island developers in the street
improvements was again assumed.
In summary, since 1975 this Department has assumed that the developers of
Claughton Island are committed for street improvements as shown in the traffic
studies conducted by Alan M. Voorhees and Associates Inc.; the provision of
these improvements is not conditioned by the 800 vph cap. Cost participation
by the affected developers should be equitable; i.e. it is expected that the
developers of Lincoln Financial Center, the Tishman Speyer project and
Claughton Island will bear a pro -rated share. Four Ambassadors should be
contacted to re -affirm their commitment for signalization which would affect
the pro -rated share of the other three developers.
w
Page 2 of 2
0.
85-812 =`
ATTACHMENT A
s
85-812 1` 1
'Suu EAST SKCLLY DRIVE TULSA. UKLAIIU+IA '1I 3S )IH 011• y�'4
3 6'd'lacea L,r 1974
%ir. David Siripson, Jr., Director
k,of .41iarT1i, Departn—le;it of Ac^:inistration
Planning & Zoning Ejoards
Pail American Drive
i.atrli, Fla, 33133
EXPLANATORY
tee: uGi;TvU ISLAND APPLiCA i ;GIU =GR GEVELGPiUEiVT GATED Ali �5/74
U : Cir Iv11. i,pson:
1 �tiJ :.oC U,liCli� Will C011rir,ii oN; LJ :.::VVic,2 all v1 x A. tJl liiiie',L .:'.o
t3' X 20;)ar,<illg SpaCeS Ill 1}r0iiiliij.y .o �ii` ,:,i�� :Oi' OSO by the CiLy of
as 'CCj%dCSLCC ay Lill: CIL" J;t 11 1974.
_ a U\\:
�.Ijo IGr'{,.,li,y orlCr l0 ;.,.Uv.._{i.,J 11: .IJI Jl1.I,IV \I S1; l.s CI ,uul.iC, 1)l.1 ., �., .♦ . i .1 V,,, �...
5 z.cres of our property on tiiC ':7e5":.,1 )0 :ior, of the is,aru ill coasic,i.,.io,l or "
),oval of our�rprojec1, as 0L;'J1;"Ca in .ilc i,;.:�;;,;tol: lsilliiu Ap,)IicatIoll `o- ,�vc!o,i ii;.;t
r1/:5// 4. As a Jait Cf LiIiS '.iC fur,!1cr agi'ca w spenu
4_,500,GGO in inlproving the )I'07crCy,as :1 tro,)Ical iallciscapod area bVit,l
�.•'JIi;iI �, sittinlj and other similar P3SsiVe i. C,►iVltl t'S. �il't' ill ,'Liiel' a1J i'Le tO ii�al.t,..i ii :;7,5
iii perpetuity.
iie exact 3. 5 acres siiall as s!.ovril oil "ie Filial Developinerit Plaos
t :;s iCCjllireQ by Section 4 (30) of cp-? ClC2mr:,i ;Sic:iid uisu'ic:. The I:,LI:iiC .i.:.'i. .150
be aSSLIrcd by our execution of .a Casci,'zit (ill a f01•in approvC.C; X1
Ci.y At1.0
' i-ney) or other Such doom ailt as Our COU.',Sei r1;Ciair`S.
iiC rise of this property shall bo -aSLriCtc:; i:0 :,i;.t of L.oplcal IuiiCiSC:,�)C�• ,:.;(.
aSSOCiCLCu ,}�dt'strlan LISC5 and OLhcr SUC;i L.SLS iC: LICS.w :} f tii3 viL y ;1.,�.JVl� I.
,/ us, IF security dictates, we rsetvc :ilc ric�iiz to limit rile use of the purr: ,o
4..yiilj,1� ii0Ur5. ,
I ^
r
i I
,I
{
85-812 r
r1i
,.Ir. David Simpson, Jr.
1 December 1974
Page 2
it ;)ol;,'Cc! OUt that it Is not ,cquircd t0 Pi'OVIGc? .an11 l)IIWIC Park :di1G Ifi
,).'oj'acc lwitli the exception of tiie 20 MOt to q.,ailf% for
uii of ti'a ;onuses stipulated in tre Cci,,Cral lsiurb District. This ocIzr of a
�u(i< is an eXtraorainary offer tiiat, we believe, U21ii01)straLes beyond a doUuC
t,)O OVeIti meiill; ng public benefit associated V4itil Gle uPpioVal Jf Ol.f PrC,ect as
i)2f`witfl submitted.
icic 'e�l�'I,
C. Poe
cc: E. N . C laug,Aon
vviJ VOJIE'
r
k
Y
ve 1
x
x
i{{_
• •
.{ ✓ Sys,
;L� � .miii .:tyt.i
'�
IL
w
wo
•
^k
n� 3Tb
$* "met:•
�
i -.
: ; i
.
•
q,.
a;
.1�Mwww .w• ..
n
.1 �
�r stir �•'
g
a,
i
i
ATTACHMENT B
85�812 ,
44
_
3;1-$1a.�.iS
At -At
Florida' 311
De, It firs ClauMttt0h
rdgardg to itetts al'14 .:La ,and #1AS as sed at out
ih
ee'ci:tg vE,te'tdai', the ie��i Pitt Departftftt hat, ad
ee�� �n
paste etpanded its setvice! to -ea akpandi..'_
;.ill continue to do so to -he f��ture.
lti►t+ jjl'5L refiucts the report ;tade 3y Captain ::..
in which,tie protects
ciceullough, Comander,
for an additional Pescue ti ftit with ; he 61,augr.ton
the :teed'
'Leland Develophent contributing for one half of t h I t reed.
lten 3t14` reflects the report Made by Captain 1. fi+ `��.►'tdet,
'.'PC-tt`ie
Deputy Fire ,tatshal, in his analysis of the it:patt
yy the iroposel: c��•'c1�,�..er.t
Fire pr�+ienton C,ureau "caused
F
of Claughton LsLatd.
itetl i'15 reflects the report toads by apta2. :t :t. '. vevita",
t'ne problez
;: ter SuPp1Y Officer, -in which lie enumerates
duo to the Cla;i,ittis:t _. 3::d
to Vire' Suppression Services
Development.
:hose report, plus otters made by Lieutenant '.':. 'sir, `:re
Planninu, and ='eputY
Communication 8, Captain C. knderson,
r� flect ".lit a rar:
Chief H. w, .;rice, Operations, all
daily challenge.- that the. +. am Fire �epgrt:-e:nt �-u: t ' : set
and find solutions for through training, 3;:pardin_ 1 jd .Zrow'
ing with the timca.
Sincerely,
7L• A • Hickr.*-an
?ire :'�^�+rLrAnt
h� ^^�1{ � "'2?'lt ��"i t:i �.."'E",! .i,^, ••� :I ."n(ilii•:� �E1..
T f IC cur
I' O (�'�. a t� r
?r?ce will cr!. X_, e tilth our ,chedulf:
rr.' •:cur reeds,
r.. y arra: ^ fl-.r -?c,;r cc crt,t_cn d it is a real
r, <,_r- * o �� ?+c �^d r.r!vct� cectcru t:ark!n:*
n v ,e o :� � �.I('. r �b � ., .
tc,-,-ther fcr ll—h :u lic: °ntc.rec:t.
F-na; cctftl::;� 1
.Inc
1
-� ,. ►, a r• .^ r , v
+
n
of
85-su
This document is submitted in fulfillment
of the requirements for Application for
Develeiroent in accordance with the
SPD-1 Central Island District requirements
for Clau;i)ton Isicnu.
Novcmbc!r 15, 1974
t
1
I
t�
�I : Qx �ci�-lorn mar aAL Cm. any.
D ocaiwvaA' " o►� '1�,�,
i
i
i •
r.
0
I)t(- I IUN ::( I )(a)
FrAC!i i L:T I'LJ:C i Cnq P r(�_�
If Is in-cricied ro a �IrC station L. SUttiCiPnt SIZQ to nrnio,-t tho end
oronerty 'Ii.., `o orc/i.e it to City at no jai`. The o%-,r er wiII have his C:,n
see _!rit, fLrce ana 'fl_ cc'st shall :OfnC .:j/ the o%vtier; noviever� `Ile I�."iG^'i police.
wi;l I,.-i-:e acc ss to t' e !slanca and tG all crec, ithin the Isl:::id for protection of
the f.slc-Iws as clrr. -,staticcs dictGte. Cn-lda.-,d 7nwer ana water facilities are
bcIrg crG'Jidcd by Ii1i C'+'+'ll.'.r at no cost to the Clt, .
85-812 2 `/
I
I
a
f-
ATTACHMENT C
ri
..:e a M'. recor'_ of Janua:. 1074 as well as this revised rencr t in.icate
'n-.r a -!U.._�er -eater .��n ,;te :?,0 :::..enticned in _ne Dc:vn-c- n
report can be eificientl accorn.-nodated. This discrenanc occ_ re;.
E,ecauSe -.;e Dov.•ntom.•n '.fi7.:i reoor: findings :were case:i _r, ca ;ac.t' anaiv --i -
....in- .ne-?xistinz signalized conditions at S. E. 3t1: S.rQe*, :: Zernas
were cased on capacit -v anai• =is in•: o : i.nZ a nev. , : e-
:)::anth and S. _. 3t:, Street interconnec:ed signai a .il
re,--. tew, :,, o:�'.d be required -o meet an:icicated _r affic Ile—and_z cn
. =:e.:.. The increased efficiency obtained by the instai._:ion of
c?.v ecuioment becomes quite obvious upon reviewing this report.
-
t'4in7 the trafi is data obtained in 1973 by NIV and assuming no jro;vth in
tintraffic volumes (SIUATS predicts one percent annaul decrease),
canacit - anai_: ses show t.".at t::_ two critical intersections shoui.: oaerate
Level c: So -ice B in 1975 1 ;uct before the start of ' Claught n o .stand
�c •' °'.or :en:�. Bet:.-een 1975 and 19 p, 260,000 square feet of office soacP
1, 500 co::dominium units and 300 hotel rooms are orogrlmmed to be built.
trips generated by this new development would have very little impact
on traffic operations in the area, however it is recommended that the
i
operational impro.,ements be imalemented:
• Modify pavement .markings to permit three lanes southbound
on Brickell Avenue at S. E. 7th Street and taper to t%:•o lanes
on the north leg at S. E. 8th Street. Also modify pavement
markings to permit double left -turn lane northbound; this
change would require coordination between the signals at
S. E. 7th and S. E. 8th Streets.
• Modify existing signal operations to permit right turn north-
bound on S. E, 3th Street to overlao with southbound left
turn from Brickell Avenue into S. E. 8th Street.
1
F
s
1S
;i
i
•
it 85-8�2
1
!I -
Place more ,.:,��is �n carcoollnq rcu?� .,cai: r;:�.,
:Jr^cra-s (`"i= is in of recent _ . Si.
T ranscortation -f:'or-s :o increase car
introduction :): a nation:':ide carpocl D(15 ,00l aC::c.^,
and ..:(' r�cozed msta:l3t.On -it a c7.....,.t 'ri-"�
-._^•�- -` -.'... z[lOu1C • nsure )ceration at Le, -el of Se :ice C.
?n
,'i... cor.• :.�'ed e^.nhasi� excected on er.erg,conservation, t e en:iror.-
rnt: -nt cr.d :-:a_S transit i:ncrovew:ents, transit ,,sage should increase to
2--, percent ..:e B:iC'.-e" ,:enue-Clau5:iton 'Island area. This :".'."_ar:s
_::at .:ars _,_age in tCl? LBric.:c'__l Avenue area 'Mould, 'ov 1?30, reac:l le.-els
h c::r rentiv attained in the Miami CBD. With extensive new develop —lent
occurring elsewhere along Brickell avenue, this is a reasonable assumption.
_ _..:.ant -_:hour.`, o: a-flc''_ soace (160, )00 square °eet� and residential
junits ara nrogra:r med 'or 1.980. To measure the impact of the 1930 develop-
-ent, caoacity analyses were performed assuming increased transit usage
and auto occupancy. As shown in :appendix B (Figure B-I), both, critical
intersections, with 1975-1979 recommended improvement_, should operate
at Le.•el of Service C.
Since a significant amount of new Ciaughton Island development Mould
occur between 1981 and 1383, it .could be appropriate to schedule the
3 following improvements at the critical intersections in this period:
1
16
• T.ie installation of ne:v si=n.al
('Cr-IO'..-eriZed 5. trP ;, 1C.. .^'.._I 1` _-.;n
:rr.'Ctr fi-.-e-C):?a.'_e coeratiCr, .-et.,:een 7. `.7 and S. E, '..
• �.. =_� �. _ "'?'..l' �_'nt to _-:e 3rickei. :Pn•�'' ..�`'Ciz:l .�e-:t:?e^.
... _n.: S. Z'. ita Str ee to oern it mcr e J:.ic e.nt '.,lti.iza-
i n '1: `. -.e -:av ew:ent-xidt,-.
• E:.*enSion of .:le left -urn lane for Southbound .raf.ic aD7roacning
^n tale eaSt lea of S. i. 3tr. Street at Brickei. .y': e^'.:P, east
-o �.ne intersection of 5a .='L ore Drive.
F i_ r e 5 St rates recommended :.,odifications to the signal chasing.
rl. 7 St rates modifications to the .—edian. A.aI-,SiS of
:' .._...aC.. -n :arious aperoache5 `.o :lie two critical intersections Sncv:ed
::e critical :r.ovew:ent at f'.11 Claug::`.on island de:•elooment -.vould be
z- :curd -raffic turning right from the east apprcach on S. E. 8th Street,
and 1 2ft .-)rlto ti. E. To th Street. This movement was critical because
of .. craze ca^.acit bet:veen S. E. 7th and S. E. 3th Streets on Brickell
.a : er.::e. into rcor.nection and coordination of the two signals proved
:iecessa:•:-. The Highwai: Caoacitv 'Manual procedures were used to deter-
..•• en -i::e c•:cle tir: e 1 G. C` recuiremerts for the various rnove-
:ents. Aopendi:: B (Figure B-5) identifies the various movements.
_appendix B (Table B-1) also shows the G: C requirement .rer sus the G, C
ailotMent under the modified phasing.
T:;e three iMprovements listed above are really not necessary until M9
insoiar as roadwav capacity is concerned, but would orovide important
additional operating efficiency between 1O31 and 1989. Since the improve-
ments are so compatible with the computerized signal s,. stem, it seems
more appropriate to introduce the changes in 1931 rather than gait until
103!:•. This would permit the benefits derived frorn the improven eats
::rhich involve only a moderate exDenditru: o) to be realized for a greater
length of time.
17
4
I
t
Z i
N
_T
C7
C
7
V �
j
N
85-su �
u
ti.
A
b 10 � 10
SCALE �FFT
L
S E 3TH S7 • - - -
W 1
Y !
,
;
1�
1
FIGURE 6
PROPOSED ROADWAY DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS
.A %
i
r� -
e t
u t'.t� e e ft 19 o �� 1 � ' 1r r: �
$l acid 1��,.., �� 0)_ �6f of�rce �bace, "On riotei
c�o,�zsti ? 9 Loftdot�iHium_ and ,A;I, 000 stdUafe feet of ;retail a mace {.'c)uld
7t' d tft to Add- oT �i::Lodate the tn' attIC jjefted b :` iftd- "I ed�ad
�zor�rie!it, the f6116V'ingt :iea�t;'A es .t°ould be tieces�a�5
_ Y
J
itistit'ite staitge."ed Yvork hours for office W6r ke."s, The
ef►pct of this action ;would be that aoo. okir:�atel,. 20 oeritetlt
Of the ;eat{ h6ur, generated office trib8 :would odour one=:iaif
, L r, before' the afternoon peak, 60 deedent -.mould odour
dutina :he oeak hour, and ?0 Pendent s-vould de -du fie= !f - o ,.a
hour After tiie peak.
Continue local orbVAftr ;s to bro vide ince:stives to oar000litia'
b�asaooli.�ig to attain a'goal of 1. 6 persons per car,
Anui% inn, ear tier• assuw-.ptions to the 1988 generated trios i 1. 6 oersons
c�t'r car► 2' pendent transit usage, split :Mork shifts for office workers),
: o:)riate capacity analyses were per.'o.r :ed. The results indicated
`"t .ith. t'he i4mnm.-e:mz ents to date, is cludins the fire -phase signal ooers-
Lion -And ::'edian modification, Level of Service C. would be Achieved at
C. itical intersections. (See Figure B-? in Appendix B fOr details.) ,
1984- 1986
Bet.%,een 1984 and 1986, 260, 000 square feet of officeand -73 condominiums
xould be built. Assuming continued emphasis is placed on mass transit';
and on the proposed rapid transit system, 30 percent transit usage is
considered attainable by 1986. This transit usage factor, coupled with a
car occupancy rate of 1. 6 persons per car and split work shifts for office
workers, would ensure;Level of Service C at botn critical intersections.
20
�3
I
IW
sa
:dd�u26ttal desm-laomnent b wlM, Lute .51A thitt '. tier iad 18 60, 060
„aY=e .eej offcr�e ihind sinih
3 c.;;:anc:° slstit km1`!; s:i :es for of. ide .z°6tj e:.s, And the Widening 6f
:;p11 Avenue bridge over the tiat:9i Ri, er 16 si m net do reco .i
;t.fAe" in -Ke t a;�,�nto�aan' Miami renart W6Uld ensure Level of Ser.jica t at
.n t,,c.'i4ical intersect�m-, (8 ee Fi res 8-� and -5, Charta =1 R ld
:-2. ,l ei i Able 8=1 in At)be,ndix 8 .06e details of capaeit �` analvAis, �
C
n0*64, °et?I 1� 75 and Iq"tn. the proposed de.seloornent program would rewire
ar.l :• ,.Unor ffia enaineerina itftb: bvernents,
i is tolerneatation of prolreskve cor:1.puterized signal system,
Oft Brickell A%c enue (progra ..med by trade County).
is `Ibdification of pavement marking at the intersection of .
S.B. nth Street and Briekell :avenue to permit three lanes
southbound and,a double left -turn lane northbound. Split
signal phasing "should also be instituted.
• Modify exist n si nal at the intersection of 5. B. 8th St
gg reet
_
and 13rickell.L avenue to permit right -turn northbound on S. E.
8th Street to overlao with southbound left -turn from Brickell
Avenue into S. E. 8th Street.
• In addition. there is reason to belietre that increased emphasis
on carpooling /buspooling will begin to significantly effect
car, occupancy during this time period.
BY 1030„ with more emphasis being placed on greater transit usage and
increased federal funding for transit and energy conaers•stipn. transit
21
i
i
l
L
_ —. r'nue area D1 C'ai z—on _ mz1�nC :r.crea.ze
:. .... �� '. cercent -- .ai -o current --:P` -in '`:e C-D. :n a, i
car :cc::oanc%is rcreaze 'o rzons r a..
7e.^i':._3 .r7 :,'�F' .:ncra_e cCS_.. SiCai
.rom a caCaciz' itandcoin. ;n...
;�%-e:::en:_ _nou.d tie i:rclemented bet �: een : ? : and
• _.._tai:,ticn o: a fi: e-.. ase .nterccnnected signal
a' i. i. i t.^. a::c: :;. L' . S'reets
• Redesian )i :e :`.:e111.an Je':t:een S. E. 1.-h and J. E. I"h
z'r eets
• E:nension o: .e"-nir n :ane on East ai�cr^ac.". of S. E. 3t.",
S' "-eet
and 1�3'1, the introduction of split work shifts for Claughton
13;and office emoioyees, 35 percent transit usage, and continued emphasis
-usoco:i^g and-?nerzy conservation, would ensure an
' e :"ei of ser ice a- .::e .-.vo interSections of corce^r.
and 1939, an Increase in transit utiii7at:on .ro: : 25 perce:':t .
.0 M ^ercent which is reasonable in view of anticipated transit emphasis).
:`:ith pre%"ous improvements. would ensure Level of Service C at the
critica: inter -sections.
,n summary, the development of Claughton Island will not pose serious
traffic problems which cannot be solved by traffic operational -type
ir:prove.ments and continued emphasis on :Hass transit, rapid transit,
and shared use of private automobiles.
I
I
ATTACHMENT D
lori1 1. 1975
*:r. Cucene L. Simm, Cirectcr
Cep_-.t.-. ent of Traffic -nd Trarsportation
8675 : firth Nest 13 street Suite 201
ian, i, Florida 33166
Re: Claubhton Island
Yo.;r letter dated March 1S, 1975
Cear !, r. Simm:
7-.is letter is to clarify our intention to pay for the irnprover.-ents
to the me !4,in !-:etween '7tr: street and Eth street on Brickell .venue
as o•.:tlined by our traffic engineers, Alan Voor"ees and Asacciates,.
Inc. in our traffic analysis heretofore furnished to your office.
:I: c:- i' is felt t' .t t".ese in-F rove-erts are act'i.:ll:. rt c--t: a -*
e .. i;l 1- .. fc.:.ard to +►or�ing v.it', yov and, your staff to work out
V-.C. jct .il
Coni.err,inn o':r upcorr•i ;g tro-iifications to our master plan for Claughton
C Islan j, please be assured that it is very =.uch our intention to work
vit!: your office in atten pting to develop the test solution fo:• all concerned
with regar.: to a pos�,V;le bascule bridge that could extend f rorn the
rr.sinlan,� on the north to Claubhton Island.
Sincerely yours,
Frztes r roLg_ties. Inc.
by: H oUert C. Foe
RCP:FtiC:brl
Claubhton Island Company
by: i. h . Cla gr,ton
?i�; ::►,'-+'-+1i?I�.:�iyi'e s1.., ..' �i...' lox. iunri.�:e
Wk
r
Qtz.Q7 7 .1
x
! Owl
70
1575 Nw 53 5-MEE-. 5- -E 2V DEPARTMENT OF TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION
u AMI. =-::= =A 33'55
--Em"CNE 305 592-0350 April 2, 1975
Mr. George J. Acton, Jr. ._
Director, Planning Department 07
P.O. Box 708
Coconut Grove Station
,tiami, Florida 33133 '
Dear Mr. Acton:
Re: Claughton Island
Thank you for your informative response to ou17 letter of March 19, 1975 re-
garding some clarifications to the Developmen,: Order for Claughton Island.
As you know, our letter was written under the misunderstanding that the De-
velopment Order had not yet been :issued.
In the interim we have discussed the questions we raised in our '.•larch 19th
letter with staff of the South Florida Regional Planning Council and repre-
sentatives of the developer. We have received written assurance from Messrs.
Poe and Claughton representing Frates Properties, Inc., and Claughton Island
Company, respectively, of their intention to pay for the minor modifications
that may be required to Brickell Avenue between SW 7 and SW 8 Streets that
were assumed in the traffic impact analysis of the development. Further,
their intentions are clear in working together with you and us in regard to
' a possible bascule bridge location extending from the mainland on the north
to Claughton Island.
Therefore, the matters we addressed in our letter of :March 19 have been re-
solved completely to our satisfaction and are no longer of concern to us.
Again, we thank you for your extremely informative letter.
Very truly yours,
Vim, -�-✓ .. - / • /h^ �..:/
David C. Rhinard
Transportation Planning Engineer
DC R/ j t
cc: Mr. Barry Peterson
Mr. Edward Claughton
Mr. Robert Poe
WpW
r
ATTACHMENT E
ft
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Ll
C
4/21,'75
Motion 75-349
RESOLUTICN .10. 75-423
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE, MEMORPa DUM OF _
UNDERST RING BETWEEN CLAUGHTON ISLAND
DEVELOPERS AND THE CITY OF 14IAI.1I REGARDING
LOW INCOME HOUSING, AND THE AGREEMENT TO
DISMISS THE APPEAL PRESENTLY PEITDI'L G IN THE
FLORIDA LAND AND WATER ALJUDICATORY CO3%'j^ISSION;
AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER
AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAID AGREEMENTS ON _
BEHALF OF THE CITY.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COi•LMISSION OF THE CITY OF
MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The Memorandum of Understanding
between Claughton Island Developers and the City of Miami
regarding low income housing, and the agreement to dismiss the
appeal presently pending in the Florida Land and Water
Adjudicatory Commission, be and the same are hereby approved.
Section 2. The City Manager and City Clerk`. -.are
hereby authorized and directed to sign said Agreements on behalf
of the City.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22 day of APRIL
I'I'Y
111,31A111:1► ANP AI. 4MV111 111' :
IICIIEL E. ANDERSON
,ssistant City Attorney
j ��77OHN S . I.LOYD
(City Attorney
AND CORRECTNESS:
fINIit f C A, I LIML
M A Y O R ,
CITY COMMIS6,,jr•
MEETING OE,
AP I ".3 2 1975
RESOLUT104 n0.-2,,,�. —
i512 ... j4
(2) Any acplicaticn for a building xr.:u.t or othar develcE°nt -
which would au.Uh orize any increase beyond. the 8C0 exiting vezicles
rraY.i::..r constitutes a sv!�stant-ial daviatien f_a. the revelc-,=ent Cr`aY.
Prior to such applicaUcn for building or outer develcpr,ent F'P_'�' tLits
which would authorize any increase beyond 800 exit:L.g -,raizi.cles .-axLm.-n the
Develo: er must seek and obtain an ;r.rerdmnt to said rev-.loplrent Order in
accordance with part A of .-his A� went and pt:rsuant to Sec}.icn 380.06,
Florida Statti.~tes .
(3) Developer will pre%ide to the Council copies of any and all
traffic surveys, traffic stzdies arid, recamwdations (including assarptions
upon wfiich such r , ,erdations are based) of the tepazt-,ent of Tra^pCrta-
ticn of Dade County relating to Clai.,ghtcn Island ft:_-ni.srec: to the ravelopA. r
by the Depart -,ant. of "r arspor tation and shall furnish to the Council. all
such infornation provided b'f the Developer to the Depar.� —nt of Zra^sporta-
ti cn of Dade County or the City of Miami.
(4) in the event the Develc;P-- proxsas to the Ci' .r eddit-oral
transportation tem1 iques or facilities vi ich ti:vuld have the effect of
assisting in the r airte.^arce of the aforedescr=bed limitaticn on e_.,dti .g
traffic, it will notify the Council of such plan within a reascrable tire
prior to any City Ca-,miss=cr. heaxizg thereon so that ti:e Coy.^cil ray st:cr-
mit to the City Ccmission of the City of L�.ami currents and r ,....nfat=oas
thereon prior to stitch hearing. Developer urill at such titre provide to the
Council copies of any such. prexsal s:�=.itted to the City anti any reports
and r nrtiat.iors provided to the Developer as to such pLms by the City of
Tt rPlanning Depart.'^f nt., Dade Ccunt'y Depart:,ent of 1�'3r'zportat_Cn or ot'l.°_''
lord govermnental ager_cy.
C_2
,. 85-812 ��
U
4
0
tional transpor'`at"c:1 S%Sters, Lzdess "- e Cetlelcppar proposes develc�:.---^.
which could exceed the 800 exiting vnldcle lirutation. -
(6) The Ce,mlo=ent Crda- rewires the Cevelo-per to take a
provision for a base--' e bridge cc ection at the north end of Clauzht :n
Island. The north end of Claughtcn Island sliaLI be so designed ar a
developed and the buildings shall he oriented so that in the eti-ent a bas-
cule bridge is for the purpose of connectLig the rcr h. end of
tie Island to the :-ld.ami r.ai.*iland t -.ere will be space wm-1—lzble for s=h
pu:*-pose. r'ot ing in this sec',icn shall be construed- as requiring dedication
of any lard for such purpose to the public, e:{cept as pro` idad in part
C (S) above.
D. In the event the owner/developer has not ocm rced p:-. -ical
unrk of the land.-, emczr .3ssed herein, then the Mvalo;re t order w-111
expire tree years from. the date of final action by the Florida Iz--A and
Ilater Faju dicatozy Ccrrmssion.
E. ALL references herein to Florida Statutes Section 380.06 are
intended to refer to said Statute as it is in effect at the ti,-,- of the act
or or occurrer= contmplated by this Stipulation.
F. That upon execution of this Stipulation by all the pa= , es, i
em hearing eMminer is requested to recarrand to the Florida Lard and
r
Valter Pdjcaica-tory Coc^.Tassion eat e.e Developawt Order be conditioner-' as
set forth stove and t-he ap-,-eal di. —missed.
Cirl oz t;iami Allan t r• 1lecge Esau ire
Attorney for South Florida
Regional Plarming Council
Cou.^321 for Cevelope_rs, Frates Pre -sties, Inc.
Ed::ard N. Cl Ughtcn, Jr. zr:d Sue-- a Ciau:;htcn-
Z a lttti:�vS
C-3
ATTACHMENT F
r.
85"Bli� �
0
RESOLUT_ON N0. S 9- 7 9 0
.non• r1 .• �.T��♦ ^ i�fiJ :J :. .'�. PLAZA PRCjECT►
A RESOLD �_�I C .�C�... l:�G .iiE
A DEVELCPME'IT OF REGIONAL I'•iPACT LOCATED ON
0-2ICFE'LL A�-'IUE SET''CE'7 APPROXI!IATELY SE /TH
AND SE 3TH STREETS, "IAMi, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING
ISSUANCE OF A DE��LOP!'c.`I^_ ORDER FCR SAID PROJECT
APPROVING SAID PROJECT WITH MCDIFICATIOINS, AFTER
CONSIDERING THE REPCRT AND RECOLM".E:'DATIONS OF THE
SOUTH FLOR:DA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL AND THE
PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, AS
REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF MIAMI ORDINA':CY jiSO,
AND AFTER CONDUCTING A PUBLIC HEARING = REQUIRED
BY SECTION 380.06 FLORIDA STATUTES, SAID APPROVAL
AND AUTHCRIZATION SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF THE
DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "B" AND
THE APPLICATION FCR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL; FURTHER
DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO SEND THE HEREIN RESOLU-
TION AND SAID DEVELOPMENT ORDER TO AFFECTED AGENCIES,
AND TO THE DEVELOPER.
1H EREAS, Raymond D. dasher Company has submitted a ccm-
C plete Application for Development Approval for a Development
of Regional Impact to the South Florida Regional Planning
Council pursuant to Section 380.06 Florida Statutes, and did
receive a favorable recommendation for a proposed develop-
ment order, as set forth in the Report and Recommendations
of the South Florida Regional Planning Council attached
hereto -.s Exhibit "A" and
WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its
meeting held on July 16, 1980, Item #1, following an ad-
vertised hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 21-80 by a
7 to 0 vote, recommending approval of the Development Order
for the Nasher Plaza Project, a Development of Regional
Impact, in conformity with the City of Miami Ordinance 8290,
as hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, a recommendation from the Miami Planning
Advisory Board has been forwarded as required by Ordinance
8290; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission has conducted a public
hearing, considered the Report and Recommendations of the
CITY COMMISSION
MEETING OF
0CT30 wo
no
I
u
South Florida Regional Planning Council, each element required
to be considered by Section 380.06(13) Florida Statutes and
considered the recommendation of the Planning Advisory Board.
WHEREAS, the City Commission has determined that all
legal requirements of publication at the public hearing for
the issuance of the proposed Development Order have been com-
plied with, and
WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and
in the best interests of the general welfare of the Cite
•
of Miami to issue a Development Order for the Development
of Regional Impact, as hereinafter set forth;
r NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. A Develcpment Order, attached hereto as
Exhibit "B", approving with modifications, the Nasher Plaza
Project, a Development of Regional Impact, proposed by the
Raymond D. Nasher Company for a tract on Brickell Avenue
between SF 7th and SE 8th Streets, be and the same is hereby
granted and issued.
Section 2. The Application for Development Approval is
incorporated herein by reference and relied upon by the parties
in discharging their statutory duties under Section 380.06,
Florida Statutes. Substantial compliance with the representa-
tions contained in the Application for Development Approval is
a condition for approval unless waived or modified by agree-
ment among the parties.
Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and
directed to send certified copies of this Resolution immediate-
ly to the Florida Department of Community Affairs, Division of
Local Resource Management, 2571 Executive Center Circle East,
Tallahassee, Florida 32301; to the South Florida Regional
Planning Council, 1515 MV 167th Street, Suite 429, Miami,
Florida; and to Raymond D. Nasher Company, 777 Brickell
Avenue, Miami, Florida 33131.
01
section 4. '.he recitals of fact referre-4 to i. the herein
"tv'hereas" clauses are true and correct and ,;jade a part hereof
together with Exhibit- "A".
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 30th day of
oc:03ER 1980.
YAURICE A. FEF.RE
MAURICE A. FERRE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
�'' � Cam• `��'�" �
C/
� ALPH G. ONGIE ,
TTY CLERK
PREPARED A,40 APPROVED BY:
liaj,
�• V ^
. RK A. VALENT.:NE
AS T. CITY ATT^RNEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS:
0
r
I
GREENBERG, TRAURIG, HOFGMAI,. _;POUF, CUENTEL- 5, 'NC'-rC-, P A.
L
:CSAM L. ALVAPEZ
r ♦MAGON
—V SA PIC
NC0.:N J 9ENr�MO
Tw
-M S P BLA-E
P-L - G a000S
P09E*T • 9U PLING-OY
J CA.. aL, O-^V
ALSr*1 - :A-�ANA
ALAN a -..AS[
SLE Z=88
-C`.:AL. B ,7rrEr
MAMA 9 OAVIS
•LAN - C'M'�YO
BMI•N r^. MCM V•
W LL Au A rMIEDLA40EP
MIC-AMC) GAPPE--
.A.-N iC NA6E0
LAMMENCC OOOOr SnT
t*L•` S LC
wAMV C- A L 0 M Ay
MAT --CA# -3 :OS:)-4
-C,-N V GaECVaCOG
CA PL N wAP-.E". JP.
LAMP- - .0—.4N
SC-'• P JOSf PN
MAMTIV AALS
TIMr•,.-w- E •Is11
BME41 11 KLCIY
LIYOA r AOOMOICK
STEVEN J AOAVI•.
STEVEN a LAPIOUS
OCxTCP w LC-"-.CN
PAUL • LCSTEY
,; Err ME• • LC"'NE
NOO-AN `- _ P-Irr
GAMT ^_ P[_V
.VAN a •_:)-- r_
PrEM^ A MAa- y
STEASSC-
rAM,rS ] ar APLMAY
aTony J Pf•EaSCV
ALBC13 0 111CNTCL
TOOO S MCGEL
A - P MOG^
O•r10 PCSS
Postal M aL BEYS-r•Y
CL--OPC A S C-"_'_MAN
.An. -, s SwAP
CUGC`.E Sw• -M
MAPLCNE - SI-CO.AN
LAua• P STrM-.C••SON
POBEaT -. •P►•_PIG
OAv10 .r -MrN:r
GLEE •-P1P•_E--
STANLC• w MAAS-LAG
JONAT-AN w AAPVEa
WILLIAM A, wEBCO
ZACNAP- w -OLrr
The City Commission
City of !Iiaml
Ci~v Hall
Pan American Drive
Miami, rlTrida 33131
P 0 90x '3i2990
u IAM1, r,_3010♦ 33101
'E LCMrCNES
u A-. 3--'9 37-•3e 7
TC-Cx 44,2•-2
October 16, 1980
• N
Re: 1-asher Plaza - Pro=ose, Develo--ment C.-der
Gentlemen:
The Nasher Company has filed an Application for
Development Approval which, subsequent to review ar.c approval by
the South Florida Regional Planning Council and recommendation
- for approval by the, Planning Advisory Doard of the Cite of Miami,
comes before the City Commission October 30, 1930, for its review
and action.
In conjunction with said application, this letter confirms
an agreer-ent by and iletween the gasper Company and Fctel Inter-
continental - Miami regarding the cost allocation :or sicnalization,
presignal and controller mechanisms to be installed at or near the
intersection of southeast 8th Street and South Bays'nore Drive. T::e
ac;reenient was placed into record Serte:,,fiber 25, 1930, at ou::lic
hearing on the matter before the City Commission.
Ba -8:12
10
TMp City Co2;Lmisslon
October 16, 1980
Pace ^wo
c
The Ao- icant, .:asher, y
ti:3t sa_d avreemen to 1.^.ccr—orate:i into an: approved ::evelcr en
• Order.
Resrectfull,. su'--mitted;
A%enue P::-1
Tele 'acne (303) 377-3301
u V . zk-&._o
P::.il:) G. B07 s
PGS:ctd
Encl e
GPEENSERG TRA.URIG. H0FF1.AAN. :.IPOFR'. CUENTEl- 6 P A
.. 111311
1 p 11
�..:.I� L . JJ
{{-
Let it be kncwn that pursuant to Secti^_n 380.06, Flcrida
S�_Z•1:es :-!-e Cor^issi= of the Cit of �'iar..i, Florida
:,us cc„sidered in public ;.earinz held on Senter.ber 15,
1?30, the issuance or a Development Order for Nasher
Plaza a Develoc-tent of P.erional Irnact to be located in
the City of t'iani, at aoproximately 623-799 Brickell
venue, being
All of Lots 3 and 4 and a Portion of
Lots 5 and 6
Block 103 S
nr,-L r:FLL Ai`^ A:'?'LT (E-113)
Lot 2
J . Al'STI"I HALL (2-48)
Lot 1
J . AUSTI:? HALI. LOT i PLAT (4-69)
TP-%CT "A" FLAGSHIP SUBDIVISIO'Ll (108-100)
A:M [::;PLATTE"D LA':DS LYl-"G I:ASTFRI,Y OF
S . BAYSi:OP.E DRICF. (FXTF:?DFD)
and after due ccnsideration of the censistenc;, of this
rrcposed development with regulations, and the R.enort
and Recommendations of the South Florida Res-ional plannin^
Council, the Commission takes the following action: Approval
of Application for Development Approval with the following
modifications:
^:':Ji:;GS OF FACT WITH YOPIFICATIO'?S
reve lonment
1, 1-velor.ment is limited to a Project containinp,
not more than 35,007 square feet of cor.-.nercial space;
square feet of office space, 10,000 square
feet of nedestrian-oriented retail snace overlook.ina,
a Bayfront Walk; and that the combined commercial, retail
and office space is limited to 337,507 square feet
and that a parking garage is limited to 1,710 spaces.
The project, as eronosed,would cor..?rise a floor area
ratio of less than the 2.0 allowed for the two acre site.
Further, the lot coverage shall not exceed 57'; the
enclosed pedestrian open snace at the plaza level
is 42,675 and the height of the office tower
shall not exceed 15 stories, all as specified by i
the Applicant in the Application for bevelonr..ent
Approval. as revised, and further limited by arnlicable
provisions of Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 6781.
Traffic access and Circulation
2. The ar- licant and the Cit•-Y of: Piaui (in cooneration
with other public agencies) recognize certain mutual
responsibilities in resolvinr, and mitiqatinz traffic
access and circulation problems in the vicinity.
-1-
r
.esoI hese ^:tole^•s,
..:.ant shall:
a) 3-h S,791?t
Pay f and _:,.s.ruct
a ie: _ tur : lan fro,m
the existin, center
median on SE Sth Street
to allos east o,.nd SE
Sth Street traffic to
turn e ft (northward)
int : the Flays,, c
Center prcperty, per
City standards and
signing.
Provide a left turr
lane on the east legr
of the intersection
of Sz Sth Street and
SE Bayshore Drive.
Lade ry_ct.
D—artmer,t of Traffic a
Trans-,)o— .aticn that siiznu_:zed
traffic controls be installed
at the intersection of SE Sth
Stre�r an:! SE Ra shore Dri :•e
b the Dade C.,L4 ty DCi: : Cen
warranted a^d, in ccnrorti:n
t;:Apo:lth , shall include as
ad•: ante signal ("presignal" )
acnro:;i.;.atel� 90' south of
said intersection.
Pa7 for ene-hundred Re;uest cost fr=
(1 ::) percent of t h-2 - _. - da•; e _ pe:-s cc.. �. _ , .t _. g
~o t
cos` of and it steal �- ::e tra_ f: c i. cat• at SC St"
V V
t.on of a traffic sj_gnal Street and SE Says :ore Dr_ve.
and ccntreller ^ech-
a::_c... at SE Sth Street
and SE Ba::shore Dr,-ve
or such lessor percent-
age as may be deter-
mined through cost
participation agreements,
developmental condi-
tions or offers to
contribute by o.rsr
future developers.
(The cost of purc•lasi^s
and installing th
advance signal ("pre -
south of the
intersection is to be
borne by the owner of
Hotel Intercontinental -
Accent a peal: -hour rioht-
turn restriction on exit-
ing movements from the
parking lot access along
SE Sth Street if condi-
tions warrant.
riodify the existing left -
turn stacking lane on the
east le- of the SE Sth
Street/3rickell inter-
section.
Prc:•ide a. left -turn bav
(.striping) on SL• Sth
Street to serve the
drive-in teller.
-1)-
85-812
i I j A ,
I
II I
-
11
I Izd
I
1
r
i�
1j
Ir;
.I
I 1
1
Y
•
1
li
CLAU ..7:.1
Jf
? TT
1".-T:l7`D
I
r
I
AV2A':S.;C:C.;3
W I
I�rTc�CCaTIr:StiTAL
1
1
f
HC'S
TO =c f UNCED E
.A 1 C:AI:Ci47''i t .:l.:,t;p CE'/'c=CFE;.
r,.01FtC.;T►Crr FE_C''. �,__:� Cv -
.r r�;._ "- CE'17=" TF=' I C ;.rr� t.'• _ I - S t TE
r.
85-612
VFW
Par____Cate and contribute a
crc-ra-a Sh'Ire to thJ
at_cn Ci=^_._:•�_1 at ^r
near
Fc:el In _ercor.tinen- a:u,i
on 37- StIn Street and the
C:a:_ ,t.r. Island 3r_d;e , if
warranted.
accept a peak -hour left -turn
res:. _ction or. exciting -ove-
Ments fr^n the parkicg access
drive 31_n•_ 3rickeI! A-'en::e
if ccnditic;ns ;arrant
qec'- --n t') the D.%de 5e• _.
s- ,I eed f..
at cr n'? a. _t'? exit of _..e
i^
Hots1 in ter_cn__- anta1- .iam_ at
SZ °th Street and the C.aucht�a =_
I l `� s ar,d p Jri��n and �., in3:a11 su_ _
salizaticn , if warranted.
cost cart i__::a,"ion fr=
f1A:,:re de':el f.^ors C:iltri --1 n •�
o
the tr affic impact at or near the
garage exit of Hotel Inter.cnt_nental-
Ccmn lete arrangement with the
C_auz^:on Island developers to
insure that the dual left -turn
i-nrc%-eme is of the Brlc'. et t �•:a
median bet•.ceen SE 7th and Sth S:ree=s
azreei to b• tau t..7 pa ie :
. r -:a.ne
herein by the ccn_:ticr will be
completed as needed•
recc...r 71,-4 to the Lade Count': Depart
ment of Traffic and Transportation
that signal display equipment, ccn-
troliers, loop detectors, ar.d poles
at the intersections of Brickell
Avenue/SB Sth Street and Erickell
Avenue/Sr_ 7th Street be modified
and reinst_lled per consultant -
recc,:::end;Ltions when warranted
and as funds are available. If
warranted, re -stripe the existine -
seuthbound lanes on Brickell Avenue
between SE 7th and 8th Streets to
permit dual south -to east left turn
lanes to eastbound SEE 8th Street
and two through lanes.
Stud::, in any future development
plans submitted for develcpment
review on the parcel bounded by
SE Ba;•shore Drive, SE Sth Street,
Brickell Avenue and Ambassador
Drive, the need for a right turn
lane on the south leg of the SE
Sth Street/Brickell Avenue inter-
section. If warranted, the City
cr`11 attemnt to secure needed
dedications.
Study the trunc^tion of the exist-
ing center rredian terminus on the
SO-th lag of the Brickell Avenue/
Si. Sth Street intersection to
allow signal controlled unrestricted
west -to -south left turn movements.
Request of Da0e Count;: Departrnent
of Traffic arc' Transportation, re-
stri,^. in; of the inner through lane
or the western leg of SE Sth Street
:�rta nickel'_ A•:enue to permit an
0^ti.ona1 rigit turn movement from
this lane.
I
1-' 85-812
0
The Applicant Shay.:
T *".,? C I,
Z
na t e and
R,2 C :7 n
at s th a r-
V-::e a pro r La 0
De7a-,7en-
a,
t h e C u z t 'D -1 0 f an
T.- an zr,� r
a 1 crI a act. 7,, a', 2
a z! n a I n,: r " ! �.!7 -- -i r, d
s
I r, -� e ? ns S
I
I
_..a-Lze=l an -.; r 9 s
c S r c 1, t e l I A v e e
ccs
O—e,
de-:e*-,---,e.--3
to
3(DOsouth of SE Sth
traff4-C
On
Street and 300* north
betwe,?i
307' -south Of SE Sth Street
Of S--- -Ith Street or
and 300'
north of SEE 7th Street.
other similar street
on the
west side of Brickell
Avenue southbound be-
%..%-een 300' south of SE
t-
Sth I h Street and 300'
north of SE 7",h Street.
c) SE Sa,.-shore Dri,:e
T:-,q9,'h-2r with the ov;ner of
Hoz,?l
jointly prepare a
I-e-str'pin; and mar:, -in;
plan for SE 2,-"-,sh3: Dr,
.hen transmit the plan to
the Dade Count,., Department
Of Traffic and Trans; orta-
t-;cn for approval. It is
f—ther understood that the
City will not issue a
Certificate of Occupancy for
Nasher Plaza until the re -
striping work has been in-
s--e,--te,a and approved by the
Ci. ., of Miami Public Works
Department.
d) S;; --stn Street ISW
4t-h Street
Fecuest
of the Dade County Depmrt-
Ment of
Traffic and Trans- ort at'i on
the re-stripina- of the center
throuch
traffic
Ar- .
I
i
-,i
-,i
w
•
S.•�. .-� �,�. � 5..:. lrn ST.
RSae.Q1 7
11
IE
the use of
t 'cublic transit by
c_or...,na,.ing wl t
i-'e=ro Transit Author-
itv and Dade Coun`.J
Clf?ice of Transoor-
- Adninistraticn
a'. by provi'.:r,a t-
necessary amen -:yes
shelt3_ s,
to encourage
bus ridership to and
"he Plaza.
12Me Cn the 123Srn
�.. i ^n `'-•mot an
J t t0 SOU tn 1-. Zr _
lar:_ of t:1e two
aC .C3gn lanes to per-
mit an optional south-
t7-'riC3t anI-turn MC'%v=-
rent to
Street.
Pr-'^.ib-t su`_fic_-_^t or. -
street parking, sraces
alcnC the blest s"C3 of
4th Avenue frog S'l 7th
tersection South t0
s0UthI--c.:nd' ;',C':erC'nts.
t;cr:: cl�sel:• wits the
oric::ell Asscci-n ion and
Aonlicant to Promote
mass transit use by
office tenants in the
5ric:ell Avenue ccrriJor
and to actively encourace
the ado^ticn by Brickell
Area employees of any and
all traffic measures pre-
scntca in the South Florida
P.egio^.al Planning Council
report including voluntar•:
ri a -sharing programs,
variable Mork hour schedules
suc'.: a-s staggered work hours,
flex-ti^e -and a 4-day ::•err:
week, an"emplc:•er-subsi.._-e_
t=ar.s:_ use, puzlic nromoticn
Of transit use and en-str_et
Parking prohibition and en-
forcement, which are in-
tendc:? to maximize the use of
available roaduav capacity.
Growth 'torsacenent
3. Vie CI' wi11 prepar_, in csn'j ,nct:.on with the iiiami
�CC�Ss 1'
'~� a : '�C
s
r.._1: ::h11it" :.t_.CI' , tliChin t::e1VP r.1C^t:':s
Of ttis OeVolcnnent rider, a small area cirCath manane! cnt
5t-_ to b_--Ianco th--! C:s:red use Of t;:e Br_c::e11, .13r11
Avenue, and -_^.onz Plaza area as a ma2or business activity
n~c: C C � with the (:ut11C infrastructure 1:^ProVer^Cnts neCessar_'
to s'•-;-ort suc1.1 use. The stu v rlust result in rescrr.cndea
ia:;c use plan and a Pregra:n to suopert the intcnsit�' of
azz-vit-v will !:= nar'11 _tcd in t..he st,--dy area. These
shall. _:.? .__•ani--i tte!i to Dade Count,_'iOpart-
rent Cf ':raffi Tr, the negic. fanning
c ar.d �n.�Po. _�ticn an.. nal P
- 7 �
r,
85-812
Cj•;nc_l fcr retie:. anc' -ent• _c:
b; the City. F•.trti,er to er..ent _-.e ado^_e_d ^ia ar.d
program of i-7-lovements the fit; :-:ill f_or7.:12-e-c,I-tcry
^rCC2I_:._res to eL'aIuate the ccr-rehensive anc` collect_:e
dCt3 Qf deyolonr':en- ;CCurrinz with`n the uriCf.ell�
:`.ia i �?': nue. D:;pont Placa %rea.
Erv.rcnmental
4. The Anz oiicant gill obtain, a comr.lex source ^ern:it from
the Florida Cenartnent cf En•;ironment Pep:ulations.
5: The Acolicant is encourated to use onl,.r native vegetation
species in the final project landscape plan, but is not
• required to do so.
6. The :applicant will, rrior to the issuance of a ,uilding
permit for the project sutn4t a final site and develon-
meat nlan, spec:inn, deca_led landscape and desirn treat-
ment, for Planning T>erhrtn,ent review' and a*cnroval for
a) shade and landscape treat:.ent of the nlaca level
and site perimeter; and o) sensitive design treatment
Of the parking structure.
7. The Aoalicant shall, nricr, to the issuance of a Cert:.`.sate
of Occupancy, a) submit landscape plans for a Ba"front Valk -
way for review and aonroval of the PlanninY. and Public T'orks
Penartments; h) provide and construct a 'Fa' front T:'aIt.,-•av
per a;.nroved n? ans; c) dedicate a tweet- (2rn foot •aide
( public easement imr,.ediately upland of tI:e nean hi-. h water
line and d) provide for pernetual maintenance of the Bav-
front Walkwav at his oc-,-n ernense, it heing. understood that
this paragraph is further conditioned by the Waterfront
Charter Amendment as interpreted by the'City Commission
as follows:
Fifty (59) feet Ba;:front setback and
Sixteen (16',:.) percent view corridor.
General
3. T:.= Apolicant shall submit a renorc, twelve (12) months
from the date of issuance of this Cevelonnent Order and
each twelve (12) months thereafter until a certificate
of Occupancy is issued, to the South Florida Rerional
Planning Council; the State of Florida Deoartment of
Coral unity Affairs, Division of Local Resourc! Manage-
ment; all affected rermittinr agencies and the Planning
Director, City of Miami Planning Penartment. This re-
port shall contain, for the nreceeding twelve (12) months:
A general descrintion of construction nrooress
in terms of construction dollars and emnlovment
compared to the schedule in the Apnlicanc's
Application for Development Approval.
Specific progress in response to paragraphs
2. 4, 5, 6, 7 and9, sneci:ically demonstrating.
nrooress on and in compliance with paragraph 10,
it being understood that submission of this
report is nor_ a substitution for specific
reports required by these paragraphs.
A cumulative list of all nermits or approvals
applied for, approved or denied.
A statement as to whether any proposed rroject
construction changes in the ensuing twelve
. ,
0
elopnent Crr
..1 u
I i 7 J
l..I a n n i n z Directr , C ty o. "I m•I P1an;,ins D^-'1, "7e7t
:,it`'it c re'z^_t i7 r^_^-ram 3^^,to c •,---r }n'_ 33 --- -1re
c3:"�olianCe wit i t:liS Levelcc..,e:�t Crier
9. l J'-• 1-i Z ant S h a 1 i t e^ iat Un 3d 13711s oi, the 3 t r
to receiving, a buillin pe:-mit.
10. The De`:elc^nent Cr er shall be nu:l an� void if su,stant.a1
de`. i .. ent ha- n, t be un in t1,�o (2) years of the reZ. ;7de_d
dat'= of t-i.3 De':eI:cn-ant C7•'er. SL:,7stannal de elc::-ent
is de.inel herein as the achieve- lent o: the itemns
a) Cci.structiOn of b.:ilding fcun(lations for the pro -
posed deve1'� ent.
b) Ccn- _ruction of inIerin traffic aces: iMr7:)Ve-
melts to incI —_:
_trr _. ^ a wes_ t--stu.., le`- _•.:r. land on
t .- east le; c: t e S:. Sth Stree ,'Sc
Ba;:shore Drive intersection.
- prc:,ibit_cn of_u:f_c,ent on - -t--eet paring
spaces extending southerly along, the west
side of St`; 4th Avenue on the south le; of
the St•: 1th Avenue/S.� 7th Street intersection
to provide unconstrained throuvh movement
seuthbound (by the City).
on the east leg of the SE 3th Street/Brickell
Avenue intersection, construction of a left -
turn lane fro^ the existing center median to
allow eastbound traffic to turn left into the
project (by the Applicant).
restriction of peak -hour right -turns for ex-
iting m-vements frtm the parkin, lot tc SS Sth
.Street and restriction of peal: -hour left -turns
'for exiting movements from the parking lot access
drive to Brickell Avenue if conditions warrant.
11. All traffic improvements not subject to Parigraph 10, abc`:e,
required of the applicant pursuant to Para;rapli 2 of the
Development Order, shall be complete prior to the issuance
of the final certificate of occupancy.
1.1. The applicant shall give notice to Richlyd P. Brinker, Clerk
Dade County Circuit Court, 73 West Flagler Street, ;•tia:ti,
jFlorida 33130 for recording, in the Ofticial Records of Dade
Countv, Florida, as fcllous:
a. Thit the City Ccmniss_on of the Cit`• 0, ?ti3:^i
Florida has issued a Deve:cpment Order for the
Na.sher E la=a Pr _c a Dove lormen t of Re ^-n3'
Imn :=t located at a; proxi;,,ate1), 6 Z 3 - 79 -1 Br; cke11
}
Avenue, being
f all of Lots 3 and s and a portion of Lots
S and o Block 103 S
BRICKFLL ADD .4'4 '..D (3-113)
man
r,
8S-B1Z
A
A
0
Lo t
J . ?,US T I :: FIAL, ' )
Lit 1
L CT 1 P .'.'7 ( 1 09
T�.,CT "A" Fi.1C7 S':��'l. iS:I?N !iC3-100
A'vu ,:;FI %_I 1 ":D :'3 ._. -..r EASTE-_-L'i OF Jam. JfS'_P
DRIVE (=xTi::'i-L)Ez
b. That Ra-,and D. :,cs�er Cc - Can", / 7 EricReII Avenue,
Miami, Florida 3_131 is L"e— dev•-lcper;
c. That the Develccment Crier wit`; any modif Lcations
r may be exa^fined in the Cit•: Clerk's Offices,
35nn Pan American Drive, Dinner Key, Miami,
Florida 33133.
d. That the Development Order constitutes a land
develcpnent re;-ulation, applicable to the property;
it, bein; un derstocd Mat• recording of this notice
shall not constitute a lien, cloud or encumbrance
on real property, nor actual nor constru:tive notice
of any o f the s ame .
13. The applicant will inc�r�orate all or:^,final a':'! a�_Iitionai re-
v is:crs to the cr.,:-a1, su'cn_tted Ac^licat.on for de�.elo -
p
ment Approval into one co,..=lete document and will provide
copies within 90 days of the issuance of this Development
I Cr.'.e: , to the City Cito: kiiami, the Scu'th Florida Reg4.onal P lann-
in; Council and the State Department of Community Affairs.
14. The Ap^lication for Development approval is incorporated here-
in by reference and is relied upon by the parties in discharg-
ing their statutory duties under Chapter 380, Florida Statutes.
Su: :a-t:1 comoliance with the representations contained
4 _:._ r ::;.3tion for Development Ancrc�•al is a condition
for approval unless waived or modified by ag-eement among
the parties.
CM"CLUSIONS OF L?t'
.a_a Project, proposed by the Raymond D. Nasher
Company complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood
Plan, is consistent with the orderly development and goals
of the City of Miami, and complies with local land develop-
ment regulations being Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No.
6871; and
The proposed development does not unreasonably interfere with
the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land
Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami; and
The proposed development is generally consistent with the
Report and Recommendations of the South Florida R.ei;ional
Planning Council, and does not unreasonably interfere with
any of the considerations and objectives set forth in
Chapter 380, Florida Statutses.
i
-10-
.,
85-812
5
0.
ATTACHMENT G
r�
F2
f
Distribution below
February 17, 1941
tteetinzz on Brickell Avenue'
SE 8th Street Transnor'tati on
Imo_ rovements
Jo etih W.McManus, Asst. Director
Planning Department
A meeting was held at 10:00 a.m. Friday, February 6, 1981, in the
Planning Department Conference Room to discuss a) proposed trans-
portation improvements in the Brickell Avenue/SE 8th Street/S.
Bayshore Drive area: b) an apportionment of costs: and c)
a schedule of implementation.
hose present were:
for Ravmond D. Vasher Co.
Phil Boggs
for Claughton .,.sland Inc.
Ed Claughton Thomas L. Plant
Chuc{ Hyatt
for Hotel Intercontinental
J.A. Gross Jerry Murphy (PBSJ)
Laurens Mendlt-son Julio Grabiel (FGSC)
Bob Traurig Rudy J. Beres (FGSC)
for Caribank
Don Castles
A.L. Jaffe
for Dade County Dept. of Traffic and Transportation
David Rhinard Harvey Bernstein
Don Brammer
for Miami Department of Public Works
George V. Campbell Jr. Bill )lackey
for Miami Planning Department
Joe McManus
Sir. N101anus opened with an explanation of the obligations in Devel-
opment Orders, resulting from Developments of Regional Impact. per-
taining to washer Plaza and Claughton Island. Mr. Campbell followed
:with a detailed explanation of the proposed improvements.
B5�B1�
0
.06
Page 2
February 17, 1981
The proposed improvements and cost part icioati.n -.;;Pre as follows:
C1aughton Island Center median modification on Brickell
between 7th and Sth Streets; minor
modification to median north of 7th
Street and pole adjustment; complete
re-siznalization of Brickell inter-
sections at 7th and Sth Streets
.............8120,000
washer Comnan-: Center median modifications on SE 8th
Street between Brickell Bridge and
Claughton Island Birdge; east side modi-
fication of Brickell Avenue from SE
Sth Street north to the First Pres-
byterian Church; signalization at SE
Sth Street/S. Barshore Drive
.............$174,000
(if baybulkheading is included)
.............$225,000
It was noted that the pre -signal south of the SE 8th Street/S. Bay -
shore Drive intersection; the signal exiting the Hotel Intercon-
tinental garage on SE Sth Street, and re -striving of S. Bayshore
Drive were not included in the estimates but will be considered fur-
ther in the future if conditions warrant.
Mr. Campbell then explained that these improvements could be best
accomplished by a single entity, that the Miami Public Works Depart-
ment proposed to prepare engineering plans, specifications and es-
timates, take bids, award the contract, supervise construction,
and make progress payments to contractors.
The obligation of the affected developers would be due in total,
prior to award of contract with any surplus remaining after project
completion returned to the developers. Mr. Campbell also explained
that the Public Works Department would charge a percentage for
their work.
The transportation improvements would be completed prior to issueing
a Certificate of Occupancy for Nasher Plaza, in approximately two
years.
There was a general discussion among the participants of the cost
apportionment. Mr. Claughton requested a detailed cost breakdown
of all items.
Mr. Traurig raised the question of the proposed tunner under the
Miami River with the south portal north and east of 7th Street/
Brickell and underpassing Brickell to connections with 7th and Sth
Streets west of Brickell. Mr. Campbell responded that it was his
W`
0
f ((
Page 3
February 17, 1981
view that the improvements were still needed even if the t,,innel
were built but that he would continue to review the tunnel
situation. He again referred to the fact -:hat the schedule of
improvements was to be completed in time for the Nasher Plaza
opening.
There followed a discussion of the future of the Hotel Intercon-
tinental parking lot fronting on Brickell Avenue, south of 8th
Street. Mr. Campbell referred to the Vasher Plaza Development Order,
and cited the City's position that a tapered northbound right turn
lane on the south leg of the Brickell/SE 8th Street intersection
would be desirable, starting 10' inside the property line at 8th
street and tapering south for 300'. !fir. Campbell also stated that
that corner should be rounded with a 25' radius and further that
in order to provide for turning movements, it would be desirable to
widen eastbound lanes of the Past leg of the Brickell/SE 8th Street
intersection by 4' with a 150' taper. Mr. '.tendelson responded that
any commitment on his part .could be premature at this time, but that
as the proposed improvements progressed to the design phase, both
he and .,Ir. Gross m1i ht wish to join.
The meeting closed with general agreemen, on the proposed course
of action among the affected developers 'Raymond D. Vasher Co.
and Claughton Island Inc.) Mr. Campbell agreed to forward a) de-
tailed cost estimates and cost apportionment; b) management struc-
ture proposal by the Public Wo-ks Department and c) a more defini-
tive schedule. There was some discussion if the developers were
expected to return siened agreements or some form of commitment.
which Mr. Campbell would explore further.
The meeting closed at 11:45 a.m.
Distribution:
For Vasher Plaza:
For Claughton Island/
Brickell Key
For Brickell Key Company
For Hotel Intercontinental
For Barnett Bank
For Caribank
For WGBS
For Security Trust
For First Presbyterian
Church
For FDOT
For Miami Public ;Yorks
For DOTT
Mr. Bill Morris
Mr. Edward N. Claughto
.Mr. Charles Cheezum
%ir. . Bud Braman
Mr. Laurens A `.iendelso
Mr. David Weaver
Mr. George Childs, Jr.
.Mr. Dan Di Loretto
Mr. Joseph McMahan
Dr. McVittie
Mr. John Goodin i glint
Mr. Donald W. Cather
Mr. Eugene Simm
Distribution List for Developers
Mr. Bill Morris
Ravmond D. dasher Company
777 Brickell Avenue
Miami, F1. 33131
`fr. Charles Cheezum
American Design and Development Corp.
1901 Brickell Avenue
Miami, F1. 33129
Mr. Edward Y. Claughton Jr.
Claughton Island Co.
777 Brickell Avenue
Miami, F1. 33131
Mr. Laurens A. Mendelson
9300 S. Dadeland Boulevard, Suite 308
Miami, Fl. 33156
`.fr. David Weaver
Intercap
Douglas Entrance, 800 Douglas Road
Coral Gables, Fl. 33134
Mr. George Childs Jr., President
Condor Management Corporation
40 Wall Street, Suite 2900
New York, NY 10005
Southeast
Mr. Dan Di Loretto. Vice President and General Manager
WGBS
710 Brickell Avenue
Miami, Fl. 33131
Sir. Joseph Ntc"fahan
Cushman and Wakefield
1401 Brickell Ave., Suite 305
Miami, F1. 33133
Mr. Bud Braman
Brickell Key Company
777 Brickell Avenue, Suite =1120
Miami, F1. 33131
Dr. McGittie
First Presbyterian Church
309 Brickell avenue
Miami, F1. 33131
.,
Distribution List for Develoners Page 2
Eugene Sirnm. Director _
Dade Count.- Department of Traffic and Transportation
3675 XW 53 Street
Miami , F1.
:attention: David Rhinard
Don Brammer
Donald N. Cather, Director
Public Works Department
:attention: George Campbell
John Goodkni-ht
District Engineer
Florida Department of Transportation
401 V,V 2nd Avenue
Miami, F1. _
Attention: Armando Vidal
IV
4f .: r3` iaY„ vim'
0
CITY Or MIAMI PCANN(NC OEP1.
'0P1 MAR 26 PM 1: 41
FEn.10 ' r,•,.
-"..-._FiIE._,
-1—ard I. '31au!;hton, Tr.
71au,,hton Island Company
7777 _'ri ckoll !,venue
-, 3
..1Mi, : L _
.car ''r. t:lau?hton:
��{. J.• .1.JL L.\�Vrw J•�.• � r.. .,T1r1IT
..s -►ou reaucsted in th,e TWA Aary 4, 1101- ,eetinc. at the P1,9nning
^^art -gent, we ^pne rr?eared a preli--inary estimate of the coat
�'or the '?rice:ell "i", r.ortion of transnortation im rcverents at
rickell Avenue and S. 3 Street. 1,.e costs in the attacked
r!itina- to Are 4ased on recent bid prices. 'We have applied 12 per-
:3nt to cover, inflation from the present to the tine we exaect to
:^^ceive ")ids.
coct or traffic a1-nalization includes ,^00 f ^r the inter -
^'_.tion of Ager.,ie anI ' Itrept , zrd t9,110 Por :t
,ortion of the +don't at ?rickell Avenue and 7treet.
hurt!.;; th e ^ceti. -„ ".:. Ca.'liF.rell, ofstaff, ^r^L+Osed t`:3t the
^itv could act as t`,e coordinating entity for all the inprovements
required of 'rickell : ay, '?asher, ani ultimately, the Cross-"Tendelson
interests. In order to accomplish construction with the least Its-
runtion, the City would prepare contract plans and specifications,
advertise, receive bids, award a contract, and supervise construction
off' the improverrents. "'tie cost of construction would be raid bq the
,.orcral developers involved. '"he inveloperi woul-I also ray to the
'itv an mount equal to 171 of the bid ;rice to cover costa to the
:ity for englneerind, construction inspection, :ontract ad'11n13tration
111d incidentals.
-.:
.�A .,xk3.,B+,aSYin+iK ^,Viagiiil:.ii+`+2--+a..t�3bw_ _
t
- - ��t �'-Y•�1Y ..a_
s�ti� ..
9��
��. SY iir ia`Ti3 i YiiY��c� � W i3 �t Fai yi�ifi Fi
fix{
4tt�1iT,�t51r T9{`.�%i�
i��ui i6 s�ttttr9@,1.1Ci 1i
..
f"i C T :3 �':! L it •
GIi..9�G:..,
w t�t6�.�lrj�+v-r a.��, nc 3tinb7
uiis�:� G
t�tJ liQ
r A.udeg Ci Y
neng e r V deg.
f
;G..tT.L.
x'
a„
?r"
mi
r�
�F
4~
rY�+
�n
u s�
�3
S
� r
12 �.
r
..
Spa%
1,
: ,g t
�# f�y�; �cyy� �1*i� �iy� y ti� �t p� � �gg�� 5� nor 8 t $� �=
mfEa Id praposal Lar, the .L�15pol" -0fita Wau{le. �?�� flC ls-li*C�. O� Fit�tq
mh Fitt aE�t�t�dIL t� ��!-ah ��'���ag�4ei� Vlfi �!lA$�'l�f :�i�I�tlL��'F1s�I�
Alta*ltt 6? t 1d8 3 And prior to W..;3'rd r ftta"Atat, 6Acv aantri�atar
-muici rarwar- A to tht , h4 rm11.4g 'mquitrad for his nartiohr 8a
n w u1 'p1aa In, &n jaaaufit i`ratrt Wh1 th. 'dontrattar =;auld
5 ai i 4't 'tea aasnplatia a ` n a chftti�aet j anp ' a!'. i"t i``ur WaUlA
rottlr�'.A-d p r a rota to Ri1a" �s
-
The City w6uld quire thata�+��it dual to y'; br the `estimated
-
artr�atioh hbat be p-i4 to tha' pity "up aftt to c2fVt' `�3t 11�
-U "sty d by t!;� C%its 145- to the - Me Of '%@d@#�'�i�i��i � i�ya i �`'i6 rem%ainder
u1% tit A I � �i Su.L ilG ;i�+' i �.��i 3 Ja o tl �7 1.
t the tatal fee ta the it We1114 be 17.1 at the 1-Ad pride as aZaaifted
.��ia a �e ttls �cr oona:rttctio�i will require ConplOtip.v dt the 11101 �
iF;fi�v i;t �i a �tZ.I31'- 6e �.'�,�!`1 g1tortly 11'eztdra �hC-- 06t97;�I t.466.1 or
A
��t�. �iGi This, :}a:e(1t lt.' 4sLi �� t. '�t Wil� 1uj,� •'��gA%�ri1 a to ontiiriket in,the
yi�n�
rl �Y �i►
y, y�ji
tltt�i u0�4 o UU�G�� �• S�Lr�� ����i� ���G.t ��1tai ViiiiiM tit �v� �iV Ua '.�i btgin
in iiagus't, 1'1 i
city '.till prepare anti submit for, your signature! atreembi is 'bindiri
all � sties before we o� oceed 1 * nu wimh tb disco the estlrate,
`+��C�zura dr schet`�ule: t ldas,, achtlet 'ir oleor^e '�ar�cbell ay
iinc gr,r1�
Director
.hclosure
cc`: !Ar. '.ud Draman
'rickell 'Key con. pany
be- Terry ?ercy -°Law Dent.
u,
?lanr_inu Dept rMi
oco�r
construction
'Highways
sewers'—
";
^,ertral
a;E
kk4
k
x
i
'ti�cll�M�1►ii . }�igii:�G \.i91 y s :SR7�Y'"s.
l: Lma•y :l i, �li :mil: s..�l :a'.itu3J
.` .,
i.l:+ N m:. 1... a r h /�
b 4-b & 5ut tui ei- R,-imo-tat
*lily
LAY" i
0-
12. SC/L.IF.
$
10450. 00 i
'Aedlan
C .— b"•
tier
e:�C ►a
$
87, cc,
New New 6"
Curb
&
s.V Ver
6 C
J.r.. .
� , . 5�0/W
. .
$
5,100. I' 0
New :':e'lar. Curb & 0 zt`er
35510 L.F- a $7.50/i..P. $ 20525.00
New Pavement (V Ease, " Surface)
250 S.Y. @ $10.00/S.Y. $ 22500.00
New Pavement (9" Base, 3" Surface)
50 S.Y. @ $:2.00/S.Y. $ 600.00
New Concrete Pavement (9" )
1010 S.Y. @ $21.00/S.Y. $ 21,210.00
Concrete Pavement Removal
910 S.Y. @ $18.00/S.Y. $ 16s380.00
Surface Removal
90 S.Y. a $Z.00/S. Y. $ 180.0,
� � � \`\ �
`�
.
�7Fel -C
] \4 t,�. k !2,§O/�,f,
� �����'��
.
IV�0.10
A. --j
-A
44
} .
e.1 t-t At
8 FILL 010
T CT A L
LL 9
USV-
16 c 0t00.00
Prepared
0
l A
vv•♦r'r. � �.•v rry r.
�...
.ran in axe
00.,,.,
Aa-semen
✓
350
S.I.
1,750.00
,r re`,e
?avement
Rem- al
S.
"r
zq nc
,',ew 7a*:ement
7C:": re-l?
?ase Sc 3",...:^_`'ace)
median
^urb
and Gutte:\
250
L,.T.
a $7.5C/I.:'.
5
1,?75.00 -
Medlan
curb
and Gutter Removal
26C
L.?.
a $2.50/..v.
35�50.00
1 T y" \ !
SL_—_ �- ,�
$
' y (� //1
0136 ..,v
:11171`TICINT
$
2,^04.CO
sUS-'^OTAL
$
23, 369. 00
CV
in
11 •1-17; ..14C.� :J A
, 3- -
'!?-TC7A
$
25 706 - OC
$
3C 075.00
i
1
85'-812 1'
..._._..___.__.._.......__-...__..._-._,.._y.....«.,.........,....,.....�.-..-+...
9
�.�.. ter_ _
I=L L KE A
_ _ _ + 2 .. rdCa .slr r
:raina;ze
$
i
• Pavement overlay
350 S.I.
5.0C/S.'_'•
$
1,750.00
_Cncrete ?averent
ce^c•:a1
130
New 7a./ p..lA rl ♦.
y.:�. v.y ^-�-se 1 lit �::r:'ace 1
4:.0 S.`_'.
,i 325. ;C/S.
10,250.CC
Median Curb
and Gutter
2150 L.F.
a $7.5C/L.F•
l,?75.00
J
Median Curb
and Gutter Removal
260 ,.^.
a $2.50/L.F•
S
650.00
—iT'� T r1T 12a
$
2, � .CO
O
Sum-TOTALL
$
23, 369. 00
,J
SL'?-'_', .'AL
$
25 , 706.00
i
r
85-812 f'
'Ile, c'_,ewalk
?^z T. a s-
Sidewalk Re-cvai
New paveme-: -
(5" Base 1 1" Surface`
(TI BKCKELL A'TENL?
Sidewalk Removal
3500 S.F. i $1.001S.F.
New 6" Sidewalk
1300 S.F. e $1.75/S.F.
New 4" Sidewalk
700 S.F. @ $1.50/S.F.
"Monolithic 5" Curb and Gutter
65., L.F. a $8.00/L.?.
$ 3,500.00
$ 2,270
$ 1,n5n.00
5,z0^.00
8S-812 74
I
2 1 I. F
•
J
'
.J
.
f
. �
� � 1n _ •t
i
� n n nn
New ?a.-ement
..� .. • _ .
2CZ • �. 1.. • _ .
ye �r•n �n
f
S',--7CTA
12', 99 . 10
}
. 1'1 ....Iv 7
J
,
.J
2 .i1 .^�C
f
Sicna1 at{on
S
'2,'�72.00
S.E. 8 St. to
s.... 7 St.
$
30,076.O0
S.r. 7 St. to
S.E. 5 St.
S
1� 527.miC
TOTAL
USE 3120,ClOO.Co0
Prepared by: RAL
3-9-81
85-81.2
—PWW
.. .. C '� G M L !f 7 1
:-.:r ., an4- s'.:`. moo., Removal
-
•
N-?w Pavement
^ J i
Prepared By: RAL
3-5-°1
12" iNFI 7TrJ^•4.
CONT:NG?"JC,=S 1�"
ENGI`1EEIZI, dG 1"
cr
t,ci ��1.00
0 ,
85-812
4
S-E 8 ST.
T—'
m
8
Ic
14
m
ri
104
s
CD
10 0
m
rn
BRICKELL'S AMENDED
ADDITION
--304 1
B - 113)
rn
12
R/W REQUIRED FOR BRICKELL AVE.-S-E. 8 ST.
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
PREPARED
BY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
CITY OF MIAMI FLORIDA
IR By Rs`-,
A 3-25- 81 1 6 0' ins ---c E- !i-,6-;
L E %
RN-PT2
4 ,
_ .. .. .. .... .. ..: �..r a^f:�i'T"K.d�yPsi'7Y4-:q`?i?..?' '_'.n C.r.'4�' S����'•�gh .. _.._ ... .... .. _._
•t
Li
6
3
9
10
11
1' V
13
14
15
16
l 17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2'1
28
29
�0
31
22
34
35
OF Fri vIC_•', ..:^'. :' -:; :..�
:' :.._�
-:.J?-
70 L '. U. I i� • 1,
l T'
IS112. ::D, LCC:,;:7D I:: _, SC'.
J �. O� '
n,^�
1 77 11)
t,\`:D CC_vJ 1:.D:: 1_.v _..
OF 'ic:� SCi_-_"i :.�C'"._L7i, ^.:G_..:1:�
�r ...:i=. s C ...:CIS
A:Z` ':?iE '1Pr-A . L_- UVISC�_
3(:',
�TIa:•�I, s:.���.._ .c _:Ts cc:�_'�
L 1J_
'"s s� ':_.�
�s-, .�.c=-
C,S E
S-,-H P-EnS, the lmiami Advisor's 3card, at _its r.._etiny
0.4 December 13, 1974, Item =1, following an advertised
hearinc, adc=ted Resolution NO. PAB 54-74 by, a 6 to 0 vote
(one member absent) recc;re^:iinc t e issuance of a BevG1o:p-
ment Order 'ai th mod i f ica t ions : and
►aRMAS, t:he Cit:✓ commission :.3s considered t^e
report of the South Florida regional Planning Council and
each element required to be considered by C::apter 3SO.05
of the Florida Statuses; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable
and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City
of Miami, as more specifically set forth in the City
Commission Meeting minutes of January 23, 1975, ircorporn ted
herein by reference, to issue a development order for the
d3velcpment of regional :-pact as hereinafter set forth:
NOWT, THEREFORE, BE IT P.ESOLVED 3Y THE
OF THE CITY OF :IiA:-II, FLORIDA
Section L. The Development Order, attached
hereto asE:.il_blt "A"t 3DD`"C'f!^C: tJl�. TiCC 1�3''.�OnS,
Development of Regional Impact on the proposed clevelopm nt
by Edgard N. Claughton, Jr. and 'Prates Properties 1-Ic.. ,
for Urpia -.ted Cl aughton Island, lc•ca ted in 3isca, ne Bay at
the foot of S.F.. 8th Street, after conducting a _public. --• -
OTY COMM15510N
8•i MEETI►�G Q�
r
5
a
n
10
it
12
13
14
15
16
17
is
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
s5
_L_i.
J
_:i J� :J_,� ....', ��i1 C':.1�`_�L ?v0 ) Of
-'--''S, 1 un_. 5a-5 is n^ rzant c nd
issued .
PASSZ_J tl:.""., e,u0?TZ� cz�11 O_`
fl o . '.;j I l I E ,. .
I.. C.... Y.. CT _7- IRN
PRE ypW0, i.!.-D APP.RCV-70 B"-:
MICHEL A. A'NDSRSOV
Assistant City lt=ornev
APPROV=- AS TO FOP.:•I A:M CORP.rC.: LSS :
UC ity Atto:..ney
M A Y 0 R
$_2 g 14 '
1.
� �.4leeRaAw.+sm.,
Ak
ILI
L
wiz �_. .•..%1 of l._c:^_ ��� '� _n
to
a ..?n tote ra � �� 1 -` �:� is �c::, t��', -^� =n1 1 r.•.:; � �,-- _; nn
o
1. The .SO:.th F' or+d3
that a floor area rn.•cio of 3.24 .:i`_`t conu=ss to 3.7L�
was e::C'JJ�Yo.?_., �^�r3rt':._ o= r._`�.' O.
Miami has race.:...me:-tde4 a na:._-;umm floor area ratio of
2.4 (4,371,751 square fees) which inc'_udas bonuzss
for ba.:front eazeme t and de iczcie:: of 3.5 acres for
ptfolie park. Th_ Planning Advisory Bead
a floor area ratio of 2. 5 which :;ouid : er- it5 5 3, "'17
eq,-,!rc feet of nri •. �C �cl�).;�Y./
Board ::urt'ner that a floor a,:!a ratio
i
of 3. 2i :rhich would parrit a deve'_o:zm-n:. of 5, 9"5, 0J9
f
scuure :cat would be appropriate if the develcpar
public on the a st- shor_ of tha Z.;L,�n-ft.
C1'iP ti�� �t ., - --.
7.'!1�' G:'.. .::.::;.7 � :iS I. _ t,. t � _... --tl:. it lv!l^, U'.
+:I!C ?i•t.7:^7 ..:'1..7C'1 .�0.2''a .`.i'. Ll?i)rl:':,''l_�_. ::or
C1aughL-ort ) ;1•in:'.
B-3
8 � _
il�.:l.^.'.� fia.Tf, ��'_'..'..� �..:�_'�� -,-�_.:�=. ...., r•�c �:��::t�al ...3.'�.51�ti' :�_
c'. 73. 5 un_ tz, cr ac_•2 or a total of 3, 075
yo: the oral^_a is'".� .,_11 ?ro�_.:f� for reascaabla
3.
"nc,iona:. Plan CsL:nc_l a non-residcntiai :.1cor araa o-F
1,400,0C10 Squar-2 fzat for offfiC2 and 2!J0,0C3 -cat-
A. Or re:.ai 1 u'ze :^_agicna? Plan. =. _ Cot:n^
ic:ind tii3'"- the request
Cant-ral District as a -_ jc: ufban center . Tne
dcv010ors t -"--Ore the Manning Advi Ory Board and
The City Col. issic:i is for 1,200,CGO sc,.:a:73 peat O- cz icA
and 23..1 COO s� .are few t for -eta; use. ` ^? a^n' ::g
..4e
DePa:rt.'Rent- has recce anded 400 , 000 SC4:ir'_' �_� for a ca
use and 100,000 squgre for retail use. The ?lanning
Advisory Board has reccm:iendad a to _al no :-rOsiC._::t_a? er_a
ratio of 1,133,477 5� :. 1'_a %eat.. The City Cc:-_ '.s52on i.i: —'s
that a total non-r'esi-Len teal fit'.'J'r area o! 1,201,000
be ap,pro �: i to ar C.Iauy h ;:o.i Is 1a.�c1. ! ; (� `''� Q 11. =
C-J� Sa. cc REr,-NIL. u SE
a-4
S
0
I
PE ;kM 1TT40 USES
cl
Lo : 7c a:i `/t..,:: J.,.li1ar L._..^_:i '?7._ 'oor nrC-i-�
u ram.:..a...1R:• •. _:1 _ o. r:i .� ._ ^'� J''� .. .--. � Z.:..• l� - ..��
O:eSSdri•:j n,ts as te or y uses during
onlyj :aat or 'te r-n_ � i n r -. i ^-1 tie for
, Food, _ - 6. v- • l.. i ..4� r._ r.�v � .. V � 1. i L r S L V- 1J
a:•lSri., JLJJ-� i�� —.D1_Vr oil an—! rJ:-
_.
SE=V_. '^3 :^__•7 =a as a Comic^ of a ^a-', inC facilit_!
i -
V. - L.1` no 1.....C- r C'!\.. - rs rl• r t 1. 4 e J ... L. = a- .. C.. =u..s 6.J
_' he lolloYll=li u.�...�.11.+.e�...ial us as Ca=J=.., rug and 'floor
covering Sto=:B; G=iVe-in gal 'ter: ....:::a a'�.�i._�.?^_� S,: r:!
and furnLtura store.
Council hc. �. :.ri pCo j .. as prr cam.. �.. .'! -ha G
Velour woul _ be `Zoo Co:':'atitiva c•I_J '- Ccntt _l BmL_3_.._SS
Di�t=iCt. he City C=mmi55_on --in-'s �-ate �.:a US35 a5
reconman6ad ^V -the ?larnin J3^z: ^..ant an-- 8lanni—n
AC isory F?oar-I b= '7n;!"IM7 :'O•. Rn I��?
deve1a=:,n_-a
n,,,. ,;.
5. The South Florida R:! 1ional Planning Council ffoun.3
:ha t th.. r•a J7•S 3.:? b-` C, C ^'':t t i.V : 1r"^• 1^L C•' C•�
J
•
iR.�l�l :._r... 17:1- CJ� Jam•-. ...,.'� ,1•f-:11�� ......
S...... 7Lh and S.;:. 35 1 S rz:c:,:;. Tiw Cof :21.:::a_:l:
i:,:'/�: : ' �c �,C._.:_� �i►u w U.�. ��� �n� �y �, ice, 7 .a t1a.: at , Ye 10pr2c'_.
r i
J :f
I -
11
71
..� r .:'.. _. 1_. _ . , ^.-. r r J �L J-. _.. u._ •�.. r �_ n`,
r�..0 peak i�C ,-. rzaia. i�.
:.cr a
• second at... 7:1-2 i1Ci_t" en_. Or a Isla. -ICI.
Sound a cc-plet*a la's.: of hOu,:S -
( davel o. er has o=_ 2_ to furnish .._t3 0_ :".?: _L:.:. _nC0ma
�'Ou.`ilI:Cj C:1''.: ..^.C� rental Boa L.^.1`_ COS not i:\C_ :.,.? a
for canitalizad land 'value. The dovelo?3: rc r2sa:?ted C'J
the P1_nn_, ^•7 Ad-. _Sor;'
would. be par -gin=1. 1►le plc::^.::1::y A -sort
Board fou: 3 that this f._ ure would he a.= re the low income
ta1Xe;^.^P. c13. 1: Pl : ^.::7..^.g i an�3r^. �U•-a-n^�.
developer to provide at least 300 units for e`=—••- cca-===e
income he s; ng. TheCity y Cc -a ssioz r -. s _h � _cc-
ers sha.11. 'r rou-i.C:? 1.C:. i.n(7cm-- 1,0. . inn :.nd r�C".t=
than 2.00 units on th2island to -= Cte zIo?ad and rantad i
the nannar set forth 5y -ih2 C:evalopar.
B-6
v 1.s :1 i f .. r
. ilk I C I :.n�
• S. AI 1 0tliir
portions of t^e ;?v2loa��n; clan as
?r2s_n td ljy
:i`.2 e l oiler ire her2v rot'. ._2:: :3n
avprovad su0j
to the 11,-..tc;_c13 of h2 S'D-1
D.ST^ICT and
the a:;:!-_sii n For do:ei..:men- as
apprcved by
the City Co.:,.mission.
9. The tou ti,
Florida R2.= cna l ?; annin;! Ca :nci I s;1a 1 1
rb2 furnished
4i th all prop: sa l s a n j a-j:.' .t2s o • the
t
_+ application
for the de:•elorm2nt of reilonal-•mpact.
r
Ca►PiLes Of this Qruer are to be 5znt im.meY "ao
the Division of Stc1.e Planni-IS , D2o;r,n2r:t of ,;drain:.;r3-
tion, 725 S. 3ronau9h, T a I Iah-,ssee, FIcridai to the Scut..
Florida RegicnaI Planning Council, 1515 157 Street
Suite 4299 191�;.;i, Ftor, dal to Edward N. C1 uV—,;on, Jr. ►
34 S.E. Second Avenu/e, ilia'1i� Florida; and to Fracas
Pro.ertJ. lrc 7 �! 1 �1V. T)iv cs ,.nd
0
H-7
l- -
r•. / J _
J i57
f'� I
. f I
•r
7-5
D1TE
CITY ty..:Llx
/3S
✓fin I"
1'
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
29
30
31
32
33
34
y 35
• 1 r
MEA
4/21/75
Motion 75-349
RESOLUTION N0. 75-423
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE MEMORJAIMM-t OF
UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN CLAUGHTON ISLAND
DEVELOPERS AND THE CITY OF MIAMI REGARDING
LOW INCOME HOUSING, AND THE AGREEMENT TO
DISMISS THE APPEAL PRESENTLY PENDING IN THE
FLORIDA LAND AND WATER ADJUDICATORY CC:MISSION;
AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER
AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAID AGREEMENTS ON
BEHALF OF THE CITY.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
MIAMI, rLORIDA:
Section 1. The Memorandum of Understanding
between Claughton Island Developers and the City of Miami
regarding low income housing, and the agreement to dismiss the
appeal presently pending in the Florida Land and water
Adjudicatory Commission, be and the same are hereby approved.
Section 2. The City Manager and City Clerk! -are
hereby authorized and directed to sign said Agreements on behalf
of the City.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22 day of _ APRIL
( 1975.
MURICE A. I-L!,RL _
M A Y O R
i
E -- #
_ , .. p,y nu [ 11FPN
1110;VA1t1•.li ANTI AVI'III)VI•YI IIYi
1 ►:
MICHEL E. ANDERSON
Assistant City Attorney
APPROV;D AS TO ORM AND CORRECTNESS:
EOHN S . LLOYD
�City Attorney
CITY COMMISS+uN
MEt-'T"jNG OF
APR 2 21975
Y
E'WP=:a LAND ANM t=
t•=
02" REGM:AL D:RA=L Pic= FOR
_
D�-=C-:_7'% i Md T'r.:: CIi: Cc
c. .
STIPUTATI0,1 OF�-
CC:�iTIC'iI 0?.CFR Alm
TO DIS S:SS ?= ? AI,-
r-
E.:
-E-
• .. � t to a Petition for Appeal, dated r!azch 10, 1975,
E
filed by t-Ie Sc::th Florida Regional- PPiamndng C imcil to the Flow
' L: d and Watpr rdjuLic atcry Carmissl4n, it is hereby sti=-alated and
• acreed that the De relc.mment C=Cerr dated Feb,-L:a.-y 12, 1975, adopted
by the Cite of rlialmi, Florida is a_ t-.. a by all parties to this ap-al.
the
A. The Tr@Ve1CtT.S'1t s''.a11 rot be CCPSiaa-ed as e.*1-
�.
c�..assi-: a*a change in the � peen L to
S Y S proposed d.. relc t c�•i�aich �:zs �.•i'rt:�....s a
`
substm_an' ;al deviation f= the tens of tI-.e Develogme t Order, as
detenti.red by the City Cw.mssion of the City of Miami, except as ot:=T ;•rise
'
provided in part C (2) herrein. P.ry such substa.-atial deviation shall re-
E�
ca.ire the filing, nevi= i and ap^rcval of a separate application for develcp--
a ent a ,=jai in accordance with Section 380.06, Florida Stat•.:tes.
r
r.
B. Tre Developer has su.' uttad a 2,L-_rorard=m of Crders`.cr.dirg
r
L•
to be en`. -a -red into by and between the City of Miant a:^d the Developer
w1h ich is attaci!ed hereto and r.;de a part i areof as "Attnc=..nt
'
I." The Developer agrees to be brrr"d by the provisions thereof in order
to assure ',- imt a run1r= of 200 =%i.ts of rousing as defined
L
therein sl-ui l be p=�ridad within 10 years as an integ-ral parr` of the oyez-
E
all develc:zrent sphere of Claughtcn
c-
C. Regarding t•zansoortation the Develol•zr. nt Order is clarified
a.^d cordi tionad as follcws:
i; v
' (1) The Dzvelogrent Order of the City of :•liamL reiT res trot
c
exiting pe_3Ok I-ol-r traffic mast be limited to S00 vehicul= fps per hou:.
F'
t•
it
r i
P,
._
c•
r
re
ne Le:"a c=-e^.L ,It of
o� r,3--Ze count-1 to cc:"....; -n -a"is s-=e,J
of any ne,; of Le.� � �:.��^_; :ant G:
a:.d. c-d `' ti a c� `ieS =.'"tat t. 3 ty � ti L•...'
lsl It},is rer..c�c,-1i= b1 Ci ; o� .ic:.,_ ..ems _.
pC::er, riCi?t a--.c Cuty to cease iss('^-ce cf md.C.l: g CeI,—dt5 for
^cs cn Clau,htm Is-1,-::d a� �:,: t.,., a an traffic
bV L..l'.e CeGai"u Iit ocor :�a le CC'.:.ity, rlorL2a, L.-at.
the foregoing I J\:i^LTl is baing o= w-i T be exceeded by is;z t ia-- a o= the
b"sildi :3 pe , 1t.
(2) r`u'1y application for a buildi;rig perr..Lit or otr exr
pee=it which would authorize ary i.c_-=aase beticrd the 8CO e:dt-n v&-,cles
a".:L---'"; =ns-ti.tu`es a sl: st.'_: tial deviG- n f.'ti1 I-*- Czveic;rznt Cr`=r.
P;ior to such applica-tion far h-a din, -. ^,its or other develcprent p_=,ti.ts
would auti-.cri:.e ary i; zease bevrnd 800 e.•{iL..i.:.g -vehicles the
C.?veloper must seed and cbta-Li an Arr: en^ . ent to said i-iCar 1n
accordance with part A of this ar4 pti::s =t. to Se-claon 380.06,
Florida Statues.
(3) Developer v,7411 prcv:de to the Comcil copies of any and all
traffic su*veys, traffic studies and recamws!ations (including assz:pl,,.ior.s
L:xn w'.iich su--h are base;.) of the of —6---.rsxrta-
tion of Dada- Co•.mty relating to CIaL;:^ : ;n Isla-nd f•: :i,s ed, to ti-_ Developer
by the Departzment of s"`r''c i5""C`.'.'�wi�.'..Cn ciI`.d sha.1.1. 4-u--r ? sh to the Cc,.:r.0 U all
such information provided bRl the to the of Tray-s=zta-
tion of Dade Couhty or the City of a'•:iamf.
(4) In the event trm De`:elcper proposes to tl-.e Cit,y z�'..�: `._oral
r n �,,?tion t2C:r11 es or FZ.:Lties which. �:O`L� d have the -feet f
ta..spor` 4`�: �i �:.. e___ o
assisting in the maintenance of the a o:edescribed limitattim oa ex-', .g
tra::fic, it will notify the Council of ruch plan %,,it`Ln a rerscr3a1e t ^e
prior to any City Ccr riss:.cn hearing the -eon so that the Cc=.c 1 ray st o-
r:? t to the City Commission of the City of 'MLar, c=rremts and rex-m-e _ datic,.s
em-Tech prior to such hearing. Developer uil? at such tixre provide to the
Council copies of any such proposal sue-? t`.,.ed to the City and any reports
and rarxim.widations provided to the Dzvalcpa as to su.:.h plans by the City oL
Mixxi. Planning Department, Dade Ccunt.J Cepae-- mvit of "11-rarspor+,at---.t or other
local govex-raental agency.
C-2
N
C
(5) It is u;-'erstCCd th,t i` a,2 :.:tic^.=i tra:.5x �7ticn
r
Sri SC.E ,s (inciu1i.'1ybut not Z1.;.L`_w to cZ-1 a ra
,..carsit systam, P:.1ry}�h Li a -re re-- ;.i ed L-i
to maintain the aforedescr+=Q ef�unq L'ehicul :r `..L'ip ly.:..`..... -1,
Ceveloper r--cc j'i:.'.:.es its respcnsib l lt.! to con't-r bute to t+ e oosr 0-
such additic:.31 t ansporl.--ticn systers, access to
CL:ughton Island.. 17ct_hin r:e.rein b--- c-onst--r ied as re—qairing the
Develop wit:out its ccnse t, to the c:,sts of such 8 :.-
tional :ra"L-,.Crt3`icn s'1ste-7z, unless the Cevelczer p-roposes cep.e1ca. nt
,which ut)ulld exceed the 800 exiting ti-ehi cL li.zmtation.
(6) The DeLe?c: zm t Cr%ar re-=Lres the Developer to make a
pro,. isien for a basc.;I.e bridge cc:-_ ec` en at the north end of C_.a,--^t^n
Island. 7he north erd of Clauchtcn Island shall be so designed ar3
developer: and the buildings shall be oriented so that in the event -a bas-
cule bridge is fo: the pt pose of cmr-ecting the ro:-`h and of
the island to the rainla d t-here w- 1 7 be sraCe x.-ai? able for sz:Ch
purpose. Nothing in this se--..icn shall be construed as requiring de.,ica*, .cn
of any lard for such p>.:rpose to the public, except as prm id d in part
C (5) above.
D. In the etment t^e c.,rer/deg a cper has rot cc=m ca =h,,s:caI
c.•ork of the lards ercc-,-assed herein, then the De-%-Uc=ws t Crdar will
a=ire th--ee years f-Cr. the data of fin l action by the Florida ia:d and
Water Fdjt. —4 catory Ccr-r scion.
E. All references herein to Florida Statates Sec`.icn 380.06 are
intended to refer to said Statute as it i.s in effect at the t:,n-- o: the act
or occurrenme ocnterplated by this Stipulation.
F. That upon execution of th-- s Stipuiaticn by all the --ties,
the hearing ey-w-uner- is requested to recwzz a d to the Florida Ia.^d and
va te'" ld-4u ,icstory Comm, ssicn test ti-.e cevelor rent order be conditioned as
set forth above and the appeal dimissed.
City of I•Uzrni
c �.�r....,._ \1U.6. c - —
Allan nil -ledge, Fsc u rre
P.ttorrey for South Florida
P.egion :3. Pler_*i.ng Council
E&.rard N. Claughtcn, Jr. and Su: me Claughtcn
C_3
a"
FIRM
r
' � Get'• ..� � ,
<:�� '�• :�•�?r1::CL:1 C? L':;�r.^5'�:��:G ._._.:'.�: r.._.�'-.:.�'Y't: ISu•���
�v'VESITC S T-HE Cam' -Y OF :vim _ t_: ::. Y- ,C' i 7
G�Q< THIS G;iDF.RST,%.:.-DING arri•� ed at `~is day of
17i5 by and bet,een B?.ATES PRCPE:U=0—, I:;C. , =f,;7%D N.
�s v1 S �taN
NE _
and W C.�AL;�1� :�„-.^ifr:.•S her-eir'.3i ter called ::*. ..•es ors, a:.d u
i Cl. CF FLORIDA, hereinafter called "Ci-/ . "
W I T N E S S E T :
WIMFMAS, the City did cn the 12L.:, day of :'A :r.:arv, 1975
adopt that certain resolution, Resolutie^ ::o. i 5-135, r hiclZ sets for`�h
i
the regulations for the develc; ent of that c-- -ain : ram, a-t-y )ecwn as
' Clauc::tcn Island, being an Island of 44 aces more or less located in
�i
Biscayne Bay at the mouth of the miami Rivar in Cade County, Florida,
and
I
WHEREAS, Section 6 of E 1-Libit ". " of said Resolution :ems yes
t':e investors to provide not less t:.an 200 •.:-; ts. of 1CW-i:.cc,:e :'dJLSing
on Cla;:ghtcn Island as a part of the overall develc;rent, to be developed
and rented in t-..e manner set forth by the ir.-ast,rs, and
WHEREAS, the City and the Investors are desirous of clarifying
the intent of the aforesaid provision and ass•:.ri.-g t,at the Investors
will appropriately carry out the Lntent cf said sac`_icn.
mw, Tmwr am, the parties =de--smand that the Cevelc•-cmnt
order provides as follows:
1. T.he Investors shall prcvi-..e rct less t^3z: 2C0 units .-f
low-i.n=me housing as hereinafter defined no later t: an Fe: -rua_-y 12,
1985. Said units Tray be interspersed t-=ug:lout the areas of the
Claug:::^.n Island Develcprent designated cn the Z-avelc--men.'.. Plan fcr re-
sidential Lmits in accordance with to aforesaid Resolution 75-135, and
may be provided by the Developer at such ti.7es,. and :n such r.`^^: ors and
in such rran er as the Investors desire, cCra:sra tha Cevelcp:-.ert
C_ der.
2. The te--:n "10w-i^c cmz housi.-g" sr.: l+ meaa residential
units �,hich are available for rant, lease cr sale ar:3 purc base, at 4 e
option of the Investors, at a -rental, lease cr sale price r.eet:ng tits
mi-n-i m. standards for low-irccr e housin. as estrous-nec by t e then c—,— ent
requirements published by the Depar=.ant of ousi.^g and Urban Develo.-mant
of the Federal Gover -ent in the Federal ?;aster.
8SS r/((����{ 1 `A
e�Ow ir�CF. DAVIS • LAIthey. ^mamvivs or 6AM. •Hirt ios1 &1sLs,%g Tomem. �a* AisJrrs P*w'. .5": r =.DA 331JI `�
i
0
I
r
-2_
t,
0
3. The low-income units described herein snail c-n y be
offered for rental, lease or sale to persons wino ;feet and do rot e.-{cee
the criteria for low-income individuals prescribed by the r---.ulations
in effect at the time of such rental, lease or sale prescribed -.1- e
Depart.rent of Housing and Urban Development and published in the mcst
current issue of the Federal Register.
4. The Investors' obligation pursuant to t1',is understanding
is to provide the mi;ndrum, number of lc,,r-inar.a :reusing units required
herein. However, the Investor is not hereby prevented from participating
in or receiving any funds from any local, state or federal gove_ j-,--nt
program which seeks to provide or encourage the construction and
maintenanoe of low-inocme housing.
5. Nothing :,stein shall be construed as restricting the
Investor from develcpimg or constru-gig more than the rurd-mm nu:,ber of
units required, nor shall it be construed as requiring ring any pa.••',., calar
schedule for the constn:cticn of said units so long as not less t1-= 200
of such units are ccrpleted and available for occupancy by Febrjary
12, 1985. This MemorandL-n is solely for the purpose of clarifying the
meaning and intent of the parties as set forth by all patties at .he ti-e
the aforesaid Pasolution so. 75-135 was passed by the City of :Iia^.i.
FRXTES PROPER--IMS, INC.
BY: '
Executive Vice President
ATTEST:
Assistant Secretary
v—pm— 5. CIaGU MN, JR:' v'
Utz :S
CI'.'.'Y CEF i JAMI
t •
BY: Zw, om
P UL jU,.mRt--%jS, Cit f : an3ger
APPROVED AS TO FO AND CORRECT- `� �irr►� w
,.
'
J r�wJ[1�CF-:7 4L��fTC��lR+1 `t •�k7M[u,ri` o,l • yG�rw[ TOl+[�. 00 �,ICR. wL ofl�&s�_
v
i
-3-
S= CrOKLAHOMA
' CW,11Y CF TULSA
nir:ORE a ::otarf :u:l.:c i..'1 ar.d =�r �� S`.- and vW
aforesaid, perscnally appeared K . Wortham ST i th and Jennie
j Morgan to me well )=Fom to be the Execurive Vice President
and Assistant Secretary of FRATrS PPCp S, i :C. and ac?xzwledged
L• C f f ' .7 r tt 1--
i j that they are the aforesaid officers of sa.i.. C..rpc�a,�on, that ...ey
executed the foregoing as such officers for the Furposes therein e.=ressed
and that said execution was the act and deed of said FATES PRCPE:'.I'IES, RUC.
and that they have caused t:!,.e corporate seal to be affixed thereto.
N WITNESS WIERECF, I have heremto set ry hand and affixed
my official seal this 18th day of Aori I 1975.
ricta_-y Public
State of Oklahoma }
(ti'otazy Seal)
it My Ccrnussion Expires: Feb. 4, 1977
ii
i.
Ij
S=• CF FICRInA
COUNTY OF DADE
I
'I ` BEFORE ME, a rotary Public in and for the State and County
i
aforesaid, personally appeared r" 7,WD N. CIA:ZI. M, ,TR. , to me well ].own
' • to be the person named in the foregoing Bocarent who a^.?svwledges he
executed the same for t:17.e purposes therein expressed.
Inl ;', .XSS P,,j-wEOF, I have hereiw to set ry I -and and affixed
my official seal, this 30thy of April 1975.
Not�Yv Pu=c-State o= Flor-^.a
mil)
My Ca mission Expires: Sept. 10, 1978
NQLA7'Y N%'C r.��c -7 i C-..Z, ='1 '- ..
b'Y CJMM'SS.�M �. S `_Eii. •' A' `�+
1.
!'
NIQM. •". Oon♦ ♦ IXiM♦v• AR011Npf ♦T 6^0 •wlr[ tell ♦�*C&r%[ TOw[R. IOa ♦I♦CrrtiL ♦OYLC•&Aa• �# • 3311
►
� BS
{
-4-
r
OF
�A.Z CiF
B CRE ME, a Notary Public in and for the State and Ccu.- tl
ZW41 S v2An/it/6
aforesaid, personally appeared C:i UQ*rCN : - S, to me o:ell
:'c:c rn to be the person named in the foregoing dccanent wino ac?sna, ledges
she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed.
Li WITNESS W =CF, I have hereunto set my hard and affixed
.^y official seal, this 30th day of Anril 1975.
.lotazy Public
State of
(.:otaiy Seal) ;
::y C 1 1 • ssicn EXPL+'R§fART Pu?fft3.AT1Q)F 41:5 S AT LARCe
M7 COMMISSION EXPIRES Sip?. 10, 1414
6GNOED THQU GENERAL INSURANCE UNDERWRITERS
S= CF FLORMA
CC'"TY OF DADE
BEFORE ME, a rotary Public in and for the State and Cou.^ty
aforesaid 'AIL -PH G. OINI,!E
personalT ly appeared PAUL N. Ar'D'iS , and A S S i S �a r r ,.. ,
the City Manager and City Clerk of tthe CITY OF :.INUT respectively,
who acknowledge that they are the aforesaid persons, that they have been
duly authorized by the City Comdssicn of tie City of %li =1 to execute
the foregoing document at a regular meeting of said City Cc-,m.ssicn April
10, 1975, and that they executed the foregoing pursuant to said -resolution
and in their official capacities and for the pux—poses therein erressed.
Ill WI'T:`ESS UITIMOF, I have hereunto set rrl hard and of f i-xed
my official seal, this /y day of 7),Iao, 1975.
J
Notary Public.
State of Florida at Large
(P;otary Seal)
my Cc =.ussi.cn LN=ires:
i Notary ►uiiic, State so F 0"s of Largo
MP C,eirpisbiso Eapis- Nov. 22, 197111
isndRd bP American Fire 6 Coaualry Co.
1
0444%. STAGR. 046vu 0 L"A"eT. ATTO111hSTS AT LAW. SUM 101I 011C&ra1E TOrRS. 100 0s*r&Th9 tOu1.Sv&9O. w,+101. F►QNID& 33131
49
Ralph C. Ongie ^J T 42
City Clerk
Attn: Matty Hirai
Deputy City Clerk
,Joel E. Maxwell.
Assistant Citv Attorney
August 7, 1985
Resolution R-85-81.2
Agenda Item No. 10 -
Citv Commission Meeting of
.July 25, 1985
An amended Resolution No. 85-812, passed by the City Commission
during its meeting of July 25th, 1985, is attached hereto.
This amended resolution incorporates certain conditions that the
City Commission placed on the developers of Claughton Island re-
lative to their development order and certain documents which were
incorporated within the development order.
The attached new original resolution should he substituted in
lieu of the current resolution presently in your possession. The
new resolution carries a date in the left hand corner of August
5th, 1985. This reflects the Word Processing date for incorporation
of conditions within the document itself.
During conversations with Ralph Ongie today I passed on a request
from the developer's attorney that certified copies of this item
be sent to the affected agencies and individuals specified in
Section 4, page 6, of the document by the fastest means possible.
He suggested overnight mail delivery. I would also request that
these documents be sent "certified return receipt requested."
As uEual, you will be sending'copies certified by your office.
Than', you very much for your assistance on this matter. If I can
be, of any assistance, please give me a call.
JEM:ia
Attachment
cc: Lucia A. Dougherty
City Attorney
Sergio Rodriguez, Director
Planning Department
John Leffley
Major Projects Coordinator
Planning Department
Aurelio Perez-Lugones
Director
Planning & Zoning Boards
Administration
V