Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAnalysis and MapsPage 1 of 16 NOTICE Th mb,0,1need,to tx,chedikd forapub4e nearing rxoman� w� timeon� set tnnn in the ciTy of Miami Cotle.The apptirade tlacision-making body will T3-R u T3-R a � SW 6THST N W Q CS C] � [L T5-O T5i0 l Existing Miami 21 Transect Zone Proposed Miami 21 Transect Zone in Green Pursuant to Article 7, Section 7.1.2.8 of Miami 21, as amended, the Planning Department recommends Approval of the request to rezone the Property from 11T3-R" Sub -Urban Transect — Restricted Zone to "CS" Civic Space Zone based upon the facts and findings in this staff report. SURROUNDING USES Miami 21 MCNP / Density Existing Use North T3-R Single -Family Res. - 9 du/ac Single -Family Res. South T3-R Single -Family Res. - 9 du/ac Single -Family Res. East T3-R Single -Family Res. - 9 du/ac Single -Family Res. West T3-R Single -Family Res. - 9 du/ac Single -Family Res. RELATED APPROVALS Staff Analysis Report No. ePlanPZ No. PZ-21-11449_ZC _ 600 SW 63 AV_- — Page 2 3/30/2022 PZ-21-11449 04/27/22 /j Page 2 of 16 Page 3 of 16 Subject Property outlined in yellow Proposal NOTICE This submmal needs b be sched,ktl dh a - city ty w in a�omanoe w� timeon®set tnnn in the cat Mlami Cotle.The appllcade tlaciaion-maXing bptly vAll The request for rezoning is made in preparation for a Capital Improvements Project (CIP) to develop the Property into a new municipal park. The City of Miami's Office of Capital Improvements has assigned the Property a CIP Project Number: 40-B193521 (also known as Fairlawn Community Park). The Applicant has included a Neighborhood Outreach Report ("NOR")as part of their application. According to the NOR, a community meeting was held on July 12, 2021, with the District 4 Commissioner, City staff, and the contracted consultants, Miller Legg, present. Staff Analysis Report No. ePlanPZ No. PZ-21-11449_ZC _ 600 SW 63 AV_- — Page 4 3/30/2022 PZ-21-11449 04/27/22 Page 4 of 16 NOTICE This submmal needsb be set tnnn sched,ktlcity dh an the city in a�omanoe w� timeon®iat Mlami Cotle.The appllcade tlaciaion-maXing bptly vAll At this community meeting, residents were given an opportunity to provide feedback on the design concepts of the proposed park as well as any concerns associated with developing the land into a park. The NOR includes a sign -in sheet, photos of the meeting, design concepts, the comments and suggestions provided by participants, and the votes for the desired design of the proposed park. The NOR can be read in full in Attachment 1. There is support from the community to develop the Property into the proposed park. Site Location & Surrounding Use, This site is located south of SW 6 St between SW 63 Ct and SW 63 Ave. Single -Family Residential is the most prominent existing land use surrounding the Property. A few Low Density Multifamily uses and Commercial uses can be seen to the south fronting SW 8 St. There are a handful of parcels identified as having Two -Family Residential in the blocks to the east and west. Overall, the neighborhood of the Property is overwhelmingly residential. I Existing Land Uses surrounding the Property Demographics The Property is in US Census Tract 12086005802, which is also referred to as Census Tract 58.02. According to the American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates (2015-2019), Staff Analysis Report No. ePlanPZ No. PZ-21-11449_ZC _ 600 SW 63 AV_- — Page 5 3/30/2022 PZ-21-11449 04/27/22 Page 5 of 16 NOTICE This submmal needsb be set tnnn sched,ktlcity dhap the city in a�omanoe w� timeon®in at Mlami Cotle.The appllcade tlaciaion-maXing bptly vAll 11,727 people live across 3,478 households for an average household size of 3.37 people, which is larger than the City of Miami's average household size of 2.57 people. The median household income of the area is approximately $48,861, which is $9,812 more than the citywide median household income. More than half — 57.4% - of all housing units are owner -occupied. This is more than double the percent of owner -occupied housing units citywide, which is 25.2%. Additionally, Census Tract 58.02 has more than half the vacancy rate of the City of Miami. This reinforces the statement earlier in this report about the area being a longstanding, stable residential neighborhood It is interesting to note that median home values are $40,300 less in Census Tract 58.02 than the citywide median home value. Despite the home value being lower, the median gross rent is higher in Census Tract 58.02 than the citywide median gross rent by $162 a month, or $1,944 a year. Below is a table highlighting the key socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of both Census Tract 58.02 and the City of Miami. Topicof Population 11,727 454,279 Households 3,478 176,777 Avg Household Size 3.37 2.57 Owner -Occupied 57.4% 25.2% Renter -Occupied 35.5% 59.8% Vacant 7.2% 15.0% Med Household Income $48,861 $39,049 Med Home Value $277,400 $317,700 Med Gross Rent $1,345 $1,183 0 Vehicle Households 18.3% 18.8% E. ANALYSIS Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP) Pursuant to the adopted Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the MCNP, the Property is designated "Single -Family Residential", which allows a maximum Density of 9 DU/AC and is intended primarily for single-family detached residential uses. Per the Correspondence Table —Zoning and Comprehensive Plan of the FLUM, the requested change of zoning from "T3-R"to "CS"is inconsistent with the Property's existing Future Land Use (FLU); as such, a companion FLUM Amendment from "Single -Family Residential" to "Public Parks and Recreation" is being processed concurrently under ePlan File ID No. PZ- Staff Analysis Report No. ePlanPZ No. PZ-21-11449—ZC — 600 SW 63 AV_- — Page 6 3/30/2022 PZ-21-11449 04/27/22 Page 6 of 16 NOTICE Thls submmal needs b be sched,ktl dh a city w in a�omanoe w� timeon®set tnnn in - the city cat Mlami Cotle.The appllcade tlaciaion-maXing bptly vAll 21-11843. The existing FLU is consistent with the existing zoning, and the proposed FLU is consistent with the proposed zoning. Miami 21 Code The Property is zoned "T3-R"Sub-Urban— Restricted Transect Zone. Supported development in this zoning designation is primarily intended for some Residential Uses by Right, with restricted Civic, Civic Support, and Educational Uses through the Warrant and Exception processes. The Applicant proposes to rezone the Property to "CS"Civic Space Transect Zone. Under "CS", all of the Residential Uses that are currently allowed under "T3-R" would be prohibited. While Commercial Uses are prohibited under "T3-R", some Commercial Uses would be allowed by Warrant or Exception under "CS".Additionally, more Civic and Civic Support Uses would be allowed by Warrant or Right under "CS"where they are currently either prohibited or allowed by Exception or Warrant. Finally, the Educational Uses currently allowed by Exception under the existing "T3-R"would be prohibited under the proposed "CS". Only two types of Educational Uses would be allowed by Exception in "CS"that are prohibited under the existing "T3-R"Zoning Transect. Below are excerpts from Article 4, Table 3 of the Miami 21 Code highlight the allowed Uses and development standards that would change as a result of the proposed rezoning. Table: Article 4, Table 3 Building Function: Uses DENSITY (UNITS PER ACRE) 9 N/A RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE R COMMUNITY RESIDENCE R ANCILLARY UNIT TWO FAMILY RESIDENCE MULTIFAMILY HOUSING DORMITORY HOME OFFICE R LIVE - WORK WORK - LIVE LODGING I ::::] BED & BREAKFAST Staff Analysis Report No. ePlanPZ No. PZ-21-11449—ZC — 600 SW 63 AV_- — Page 7 3/30/2022 PZ-21-11449 04/27/22 Page 7 of 16 Page 8 of 16 EDUCATIONAL CHILDCARE COLLEGE/UINVERSITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL E LEARNING CENTER MIDDLE/HIGH SCHOOL E PRE-SCHOOL E RESEARCH FACILITY SPECIAL TRAINING/VOCATIONAL INDUSTRIAL AUTO -RELATED INDUSTRIAL ESTAB. MANUFACTURING AND PROCESSING MARINE RELATED INUSTRIAL ESTAB. PRODUCTS AND SERVICES STORAGE/DISTRIBUTION FACILITY E E NOTICE This submmal needs b be sched,ktl dh a city w in a�omanoe w� timeon®set tnnn in - the city cat Mlami Cotle.The appllcade tlaciaion-maXing bptly vAll In addition to differences in Uses, there are different standards for development between the two transects. Article 5 of Miami 21 specifies the permissible standards for each Transect Zone with relation to Building Disposition, Building Configuration, Building Function and Density, Parking Standards, Architectural Standards, Landscape Standards, and Ambient Standards. Generally, all Transect Zones have very specific allowances for each standard. For example, Illustration 5.3 in Article 5 of Miami 21 specifies that Lot Coverage is restricted to 50% for the first floor and 30% for the second floor in T3-R Transect Zones. The Civic Space Transect Zone, is the only Transect Zone in Article 5 that does not have an Illustration with specific allowances for development standards. The main specifications in Article 5, Section 5.7 of Miami 21 is that Civic Space zones should have a minimum of fifty percent of its perimeter fronting a Thoroughfare and Buildings cannot have a Floor Area that exceeds 25 percent of the Lot Area. There are no Floor Area restrictions for the current zoning, which is T3-R. Staff Analysis Report No. ePlanPZ No. PZ-21-11449_ZC _ 600 SW 63 AV_- — Page 9 3/30/2022 PZ-21-11449 04/27/22 Page 9 of 16 NL - Context Photos 777 Looking south at the east half of the Property (the fenced in vacant land). A single-family home can be seen in the distance, which abuts the Property. A multifamily building can be seen in the distance. ,r . 011iii,illillow e, Looking east at the Property from SW 63 Ct. The Property is seen on the left, and single-family houses can be seen abutting to the south fronting SW 63 Ct. NOTICE This submmal needsb be set tnnn sched,ktlcity dh an the city in a�omanoe w� timeon®iat Mlami Cotle.The appllcade tlaciaion-maXing bptly vAll Looking south at the west half of the Property from SW 6 St. More multifamily buildings can be seen in the distance. These front SW 8 St. Looking west on SW 63 Ct across the street from the Property. Single-family homes front the west side of SW 63 Ct. The home on the left appears to have been updated recently. Staff Analysis Report No. ePlanPZ No. PZ-21-11449_ZC _ 600 SW 63AV_- — Page 10 3/30/2022 PZ-21-11449 04/27/22 Page 10 of 16 NOTICE This submmal needsb be set tnnn sched,ktlcity dh an the city in a�omanoe w� timeon®iat Mlami Cotle.The appllcade tlaciaion-maXing bptly vAll _1r1q1.A Looking north along SW 63 Ave from the intersection at SW 6 St. These single-family homes are across the street from the Property. The homes on this avenue also had well -maintained Looking southwest from the roundabout at the intersection of SW 6 St and SW 63 Ct. The homes front SW 63 Ct, the roundabout, and SW 6 St. These homes are directly across SW 63 Ct from the Property. The homes have well -maintained facades. Looking south along SW 63 Ave from the intersection at SW 6 St. Looking west at the Subject Property from SW 63 Ave. The The Property can be seen immediately on the right. Single-family Property (vacant land on the right) abuts a single-family house homes line SW 63 Ave and abut the Property. with solar panels. Staff Analysis Report No. ePlanPZ No. PZ-21-11449_ZC _ 600 SW 63AV_- — Page 11 3/30/2022 PZ-21-11449 04/27/22 Page 11 of 16 NOTICE This submmal needs b be sched,ktl dh a - city ty w in a�omanoe w� timeon®set tnnn in the cat Mlami Cotle.The appllcade tlaciaion-maXing bptly vAll PZ-21-11449 04/27/22 j = r"FI Ell Standing on SW 8 St looking west. SW 8 St is roughly 500 feet south of the Property. Multifamily buildings can be seen fronting SW 8 St. The City of Miami boundary ends in the center of SW 8 St and the City of West Miami begins on the south half of SW 8 St. Standing on SW 8 St looking east. A newer multifamily building can be seen on the south side of SW 8 St and is in the City of West Miami. Retail seen on the left side of the photo is in the City of Miami boundaries. Criteria for Rezoning In accordance with Article 7, Section 7.1.2.3(a), a change may be made to a Transect Zone in a manner which maintains the goals of Miami 21. In the recommendation, staff must show that it considered and studied the request with regard to the three criteria identified in Miami 21 Article 7, Section 7.1.2.8(f). The criteria and staffs findings are provided below. Criteria 1 7.1.2.8 M(1)(a) "The relationship of the proposed amendment to the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, with appropriate consideration as to whether the proposed change will further the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan; the Miami 21 Code; and other city regulations. " Staff Analysis Report No. ePlanPZ No. PZ-21-11449_ZC _ 600 SW 63AV_- — Page 12 3/30/2022 Page 12 of 16 NOTICE Thls submmal needsb be set tnnn sched,ktlcity dhap the city in a�omanoe w� timeon®in at Mlami Cotle.The appllcade tlaciaion-maXing bptly vAll PZ-21-11449 04/27/22 Analysis of The request to rezone from "T3-R"to "CS"is inconsistent with the Property's existing Criteria 1 Future Land Use designation; therefore, the Applicant is concurrently processing a companion FLUM Amendment from "Single -Family Residential" to "Public Parks and Recreation" under ePlan File ID No. PZ-22-11843. The Property is located in an established residential neighborhood. In fact, the Property is surrounded by "T3-R"Zoning Transects and "Single -Family Residential" Future Land Use designations (FLU) to the north, south, east, and west. Earlier in this report, maps show the Property is situated along a highly residential street rather than a commercial thoroughfare. A site visit conducted by Planning Department staff observed a mostly occupied single-family residential neighborhood spanning all directions away from the Property. The new Uses that would be allowed by Right or entitlement under the proposed "CS" zoning would complement the surrounding residential neighborhood. The Applicants Letter of Intent (LOI) specified that the City of Miami intends to develop the Property into a municipal park for the community to enjoy, which is consistent with the proposed "CS"zoning. The Uses allowed under the proposed "CS"and the intent to develop the Property into a park are consistent with Policy LU-1.3.15 of the MCNP. Objective PR-1.1 of the MCNP states, "The City shall work to achieve a medium - term objective of providing a park within a ten minute walk of every resident. " Currently, the Property and its surrounding parcels are not within a 10-minute walk of an existing park. Rezoning the Property from "T3-R" to "CS" would allow the Applicant to develop the Property into a park, which would work towards achieving Objective PR-1.1 by providing a park within walking distance to a residential neighborhood with gaps in parks service. Planning Department staff utilized Geographic Information Systems (GIS) analysis to determine that if the Property were developed into a park, it would provide a park within a 10-minute walk to 501 housing units that are currently underserved. Finding 1 Pursuant to Article 7, Section 7.1.28 (f)(1)(a) of Miami 21 Code, the request to rezone is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, Miami 21 Code. Criteria 2 7.1.2.8 (0(1)(b): "The need and justification for the proposed change, including changed or changing conditions that make the passage of the proposed change necessary. " Analysis of Both the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan ("MNCP")and Miami 21 Zoning Criteria 2 Code have language calling for more walkable and pedestrian -friendly development. In the MCNP, Policy PR-1.1.2 calls for acquiring land to create "walk -to parks, including neighborhood parks, in underserved areas of the City". The MCNP defines Parks and Open Space Levels of Service as having a threshold of the City's Staff Analysis Report No. ePlanPZ No. PZ-21-11449_ZC _ 600 SW 63AV_- — Page 13 3/30/2022 Page 13 of 16 NOTICE Thls submmal needsb be set tnnn sched,ktlcity dhap the city in a�omanoe w� timeon®in at Mlami Cotle.The appllcade tlaciaion-maXing bptly vAll PZ-21-11449 04/27/22 population residing within a 10-minute, barrier -free walk to a City park. Currently, the Property and its surrounding housing units are not located within walking distance of a park, meaning they are underserved and there is a need for more park space. Planning Department staff utilized GIS analysis to determine that rezoning the Property from "T3-R" to "CS" would provide a new park within a 10-minute, barrier -free walk to 501 residential units that currently have no parks within walking distance. Additionally, the Applicant held a community meeting that was advertised in English and Spanish and sent out to hundreds of residents. The meeting was well attended, and the Applicant provided attendees with an opportunity to vote on design options for the proposed park. The event indicated there was support from the neighborhood to create the park. More details on the meeting can be found in Attachment 1 — Neighborhood Outreach Report. Finding 2 In accordance with Article 7, Section 7.1.2.8 (f)(1)(b) of Miami 21 Code, the requested change in zoning is consistent. Criteria 3 Section 7.1.2.8 (0(2) "A change may be made only to the next intensity Transect Zone or by a Special Area Plan, and in a manner which maintains the goals of this Miami 21 Code to preserve Neighborhoods and to provide transitions in intensity and Building Height. " Analysis of Under Article 7, Section 7.1.2.8.a. of Miami 21, "These changes shall occur Criteria 3 successionally, in which the zoning change may be made only to a lesser Transect Zone; within the same Transect Zone to a greater or lesser intensity; or to the next higher Transect Zone, or through Special Area Plan." The Property is currently zoned "T3-R"Sub-Urban Transect Zone — Restricted. The Applicant has proposed to change the zoning to "CS"Civic Space Zone. "CS"does not allow for any density or Residential Uses, whereas "T3-R"allows density up to 9 DU/AC and allows some Residential Uses by Right. "CS" is a lesser Transect Zone than "T3-R". The Property is surrounded by properties currently zoned "T3-R". Changing the zoning of the Property from "T3-R"to "CS"would allow for the development of a municipal park to serve the residential neighborhood. The proposed change in zoning from "T3-R" to "CS" would not only preserve, but would enhance the neighborhood. Finding 3 In accordance with Article 7, Section 7.1.2.8(f)(2) of Miami 21 Code, the requested change in zoning is consistent. Staff Analysis Report No. ePlanPZ No. PZ-21-11449—ZC — 600 SW 63AV_- — Page 14 3/30/2022 Page 14 of 16 Page 15 of 16 Jacqueline Ellis Chief of Land Development NOTICE This,nbmma�d pnbbetleedng In ercortlanre wM timelines s. forth in the 01,1 Mlemi Cptle. The applies Lte dsisipn-making by y vAll reWewMe lniormation at the P-, hearing to render s recpmmend— pr a final Gedvon. PZ-21-11449 04/27/22 Page 16 of 16 ATTACHMENT 1 Neighborhood Outreach NOTICE This eu bmmd [ —& b be scheduled br a public hearing mordar•,�whn bmer�rl eronh i,the Cityof Miami CWe. The appliwh, beclsion-m&'g bWY will rewewihe inbrmatir3n at the pubc hearing to render e recornmendzdcn or a final decidcn. PZ-21-11449 \\ 04/27/22 /Ij The City of Miami did 1 community meeting on July the 121", 2021 to present the project Fairlawn Community Park at 600 SW 63 AVE, 610 SW 63 AVE, 601 SW 63 CT and 615 SW 63 CT. The meeting was advertised through a -blast to 95 recipients 3 times through the list of D4 residents who have attended other OCI events such as D4 Stormwater Masterplan and The Roads 25MPH Campaign. 500 Flyers were printing for the community meeting. Flyers were given to the D4 Office for distribution in the community. Flyers Community Meeting Joins us as we share the design concepts for the new Fairlawn Community Park in District 4! Fa additknal Information and MM 15 510 N E R feadbxk+A2h Office of Capital Manoto 7� Improvemmrtswc�ite, call OCl a[ �5j A7 &128080 n Intl en Smell Z' Mkoclelr118ff g-mm llISTA 1 idnase a nosotros Para presentarles los conceptos del diseflo del nuevo Parque Comunitario Fairlawn on el distrito 4! P—mAe F&,mecidn 6he k p4ghe O O Al i S i O N A O O wwwmkm�u.�me C(9a6p5Rje4l1 lmpmverrenta, cont nol equlpodan®M..1Q&1290,. rvl4nR� elecae5rico e,telrocl®nlaniponean nlsearoa 1 1 P a g e Presentation Community Meeting 07/12/2021 Al NOTICE This submittal neetls b —,h.&led br a public hearing h .—d— � forth in the City & M_1 ppU-d' beds— al,g bwywll rewewiheinbrmation at the pbk hearing t. —d�, . recommendation or flmM d-in., PZ-21-11449 04/27/22 AVt-!t'l-UGU!l O GO ilia 2 1 P a g e 411y!arR� NOTICE This submittal needs b be. schetluled b, a public h.,,,g In accortla,re wM1h tlmell,1 set forth in the City & MiamiCWe. Theappliwd' declsi oohing bwywill rewewtheinbrmation at the pubic hearing t, re,d,, recommentlation or a final decide,. r PZ-21-11449 = rr REV, w C 1 b FAi R-14 COMMIT' PAPA After doing the community meetings we received positives comments about the park and some recommendations about the parking and amenities' location. • Community meeting took place at the park site_ 600 SW 63r" Ave. at 6pm_ i Miller Legg reviewed the 2 concepts with the community explaining the differences between the two concepts. ■ Concept 1 was trueto the old-world Spanish layout using axial relationships and node connections. Concept 2 had a similar layout for the main entrance, but the rest of the park was laid out more organically. ML reviewed the amenities being proposed for the park. • Stickers were given out to the community to place on their preferred concept as Well as playground structures and amenities. After presentation ML and the City held a question -and -answer session for the community. ■ Questions were addressed about the concepts as well as the amenities and their placements within the park design. • The community has an issue with speeding ca rs. • The neighbor's fence on the South -East of the new proposed Park will be returned to the owners house for h is use during the construction phase. • The area on the north-east corner of the park needs to be secured due to multiple accidents reported by the neighbors. : Residents brought up concerns about the lack of police activity to mon!tar the park, ■ Residents had concerns about loose dogs in the vicinity of the park. • Community preference was to have all parking on the southwest corner of the park. They were not receptive to the on -street parking or the amount of required parking spaces per code - Suggestions to relocate children's playground area away from the northeast corner for safety concerns. + Some liked the idea of playmounds to be included in the play areas in addition to the entrance. + Concerns about not having the entire park fenced in were brought up. ■ Some warn benches. ■ Some want the benches to have an arm in the middle to avoid people w sleep on ¢hem. • Safety in the neighborhood due to the addition of the park is a concern. t Some neighbors proposed to have the park all fenced with times to open a close. • Commissioner mentioned they are working to obtain the boulevard over 63 CT until Flagler. Neighbor asked how many parking spots the park will have, and OCI staff mentioned they will confirm the exact number and inform later. t Some neighbor proposed fitness equipment aspart oftheamenities. s Police need to have presence around the park, commissioner mentioned they try but we don't have enough police, however. neighbors mentioned when they call the police they are on site -immediately- Some requested63f°Ctclosesothattheresidenceofthebuildingcannotaccesstheneighborhood. ■ Resident at 620 SW 63r■ Ave. request fencing around the back of his house. • Include bags for dog waste. ■ Concerns about older people and children in conflict with the traffic from the building on B" Street. 3 1 P a g e Community Meeting Boards Results PARK CONCEPT SELECTION Lj FAIRLIWNMN1K1IINITfP*K 4 N VOTE NUMBERS I COMMENTS 35 VOTES 411y!araa NOTICE This ae bmmal needs to be. scheduled for a public hearing h.—de w hmell,es setforth in the City& Miami CWe. Theappliwd, declsion-r &'g bndy will rewewihe Inhsrmadnn at the public hearing to re,d,, e recommended., or a final decide,. PZ-21-11449 \\ 04/27/22 Res denre liked tl,layout ofof the playgound but recom ended wadjust the emranw away from the math mad. Residence liked the load., of the dog pad—d how it has Its awn eate —edenre re. dM parralle parking all be lust d on the dng park side got to re — aty no de W see If parking needs to be all around site or on one. side. Residence agreed with all We amendles on the Image board Residence liked the mnunds on the secand mncepl wl➢IEa> -'I- - moundsadded w the dog park w well the childi-splay gmun d - �f g.17 Residence did ➢ke the s...d enlranre by the playground it v T1�17 :l to allow c 1' ''' �• „'' 11 VOTES PARK EQUIPMENT SELECTION VOTE NUMBERS �. Option 2-5 years •• ,.` camemne vnnex.lvote ^-_etlme Runker Htll:O Vote � • landscape slruc[urcs Weevos: 6 Voles Option 5 12 years ^-�- Camedme Portland: I Vole Ga d apO Vde Iavdacape Slnscture E-vo,:7 Votes •ftoo i , •, • Playground Mounds Earthen play • Flrs[Co]orfW mounds seleceted with open space Inside • ., a^ � _ nuwN roy»auNlnv •� Focal Art Piece Alternative A- ..f.dcal ScWR[. Votes (��ry� Earth rorms� i Vole ° - I ! InNrar➢ve ArL 1 Vode. InterarRve M 3. 1 Vote • Nteractive Arl3 Notes Dog Run Play Equipment ea 1Yeter'Ibtter 3 Votes • steppe,' paws d Votes Curved 14arteb 0 Yotes 'De Level jmnp: d Voles -. ..• Y•• Dog Mamds &Votes We sz Fa hw aMw r�W nrrvc s. 4 1 P a g e Pictures Community Meeting 07/12/2021 5 1 P a g e Sign in Sheets Community Meeting 07/12/2021 Fairlawn Community Park Community Meeting Monday, July 12, 2021 .... aw­ R SIGN -IN SHEET fled �.,­ NOTICE �1, ­d, b —Ih.&�d tn, a pbk h.,,,g In t,,[ , set forth in the City& M., ppU.U, dz­n nang bwywil ,,_ U,, 't the pubic h,,,,,g t, ,d,, i. submittal I _d' `h.&' NOTICE "d - `� bk h-, g nd e f.� h 'n th� ty & b�� hearing t. 'n d �1 44 M,._ CW� pp d _ n __-n t th� p ­­d�., ., � flnM d-in., PZ-21-11449 ------- 04/27/22rP Name Email Phone Address LOA �L21,-62 -**-7249 4&q- o694.3- C 7— �'7 00�16 570 .2-6 1 h '7W Name Email Phone Address oA N)f-%.cL j i 0-(, , L! C, c, r".0 6 --,? R 0-- #4/ , 'A C,�tjL)p6f,/0kJ1JW7 Z) 3�0 c b L, rl-F 711w. t L A UALY_ Lj r--L- v A �_Oz. 0 .5. u (cam z;-Z-5- 3 L-T �Aa kCA06�_� 61 Page 411y!arX� NOTICE mis s�nminai neeas m re. sw•. ,neae mr a p�be�eari nng in a�ortlan� wim emenn� se<tonn m me Citym Miami CWe. The appliwde tleclsion-rnaXing bWywill renewtheinmrmation at the pubic hearing to rentlere ruommenaation or � nnai eeuaon. PZ-21-11449 04/27/22 7 1 P a g e Name Emall Phoone[ {r/ ins 1 7 .3V�.4 7��UW C�'scT alX cow, Community Comments/Collected Cards Community Meeting 07/12/2021 COMMENTS NAME: a�r COMMENT: 7,�1a rr i V) Z w 57 0 LL) 0 u COMMENTS uAM E: �,, ' , ' rMOMENT: a, AERIAL EPLAN ID: PZ-21-11449 REZONE ADDRESSES: 600 SW 63 AV; 610 SW 63 AV; 601 SW 63 T; 615 SW 63 CT NOTICE Thls soban"d needs to be scheduled fore public hearing in rcordance with timelines ad forth in the City of Miami Code. The applira he declslon-making body will retl_the Information at the to btic hearing to render a recommendati on or a final dedd on. PZ-21-11449 04/27/22 0 125 250 500 Feet I " MIAMI 21 (EXISTING) EPLAN ID: PZ-21-11449 NOTICE This su bmitfal needsto be. hale i dbra pob-hearing ine�orden�ewhnhmefinessetiorihiniheCiryaf REZONE Miami Code. The applicade tlecision-making hotly vnll rewew Ne information at the pub4c hearing to render a recommentlation or a final decigon. ADDRESSES: 600 SW 63 AV; 610 SW 63 AV; 601 SW 63 T; 615 SW 63 CT PZ-21-11449 04/27/22 0 125 250 500 Feet T3-R 0 M SW 6TH ST -F U) CU W W Z Q Q � 2 cU) H � V M U) U) T5-O T6-8-0 s��Tys T SW18TH'ST N MIAMI21 PROPOSED EPLAN ID: PZ-21-11449 NOTICE t,n ktalneetls tom inetlotetlfor i publichearing REZONE de. Th ap t mbe Beset faith in the City of atle. The applica Ele decision -making boar wiU e infoenation at the public hearing to render a amorr—ntlati on or a fin.[ d-im on. ADDRESSES: 600 SW 63 AV; 610 SW 63 AV; 601 SW 63 T; 615 SW 63 CT PZ-21-11449 04/27/22 0 125 250 500 Feet T3-R 0 � SW 6TH ST F 3 U 0 W W N > > �� U) V cM Q0 (9 U) U) N T5-O s T6-8-0 T SW.8TH ST N