HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-86-0143i
J-8e-12E
b
L
RESOLUTION NO. 8 6
A RESOLUTION BASED UPON THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE
CITY MANAGER AND THE SELECTION COMMITTEE CONCERNING
f
CONSULTANT SELECTION FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN
"ECONOMIC
STUDY OF THE MIAMI RIVER"; CHOOSING THE NAME
OF ONE OF THE MOST QUALIFIED PROVIDERS: THE
CHESAPEAKE GROUP; LAVENTHOL & HORWATH; OR ZUCHELLI
HUNTER & ASSOC; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER
INTO CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE CITY COMMISSION'S
CHOICE; AND FURTHER INSTRUCTING THE CITY 14ANAGER TO
SUBMIT THE NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT TO THE COMMISSION FOR
APPROVAL PRIOR TO EXECUTION THEREOF.
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 85-736, dated July 18, 1985, the City
Commission authorized the issuance of a Request for Proposals for consulting
services; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager appointed Sergio Rodriguez, Director of the
Planning Department, as Chairperson for the Consultant Selection Committee; and
WHEREAS, the City has advertised publicly for proposals from consultants
interested in providing services for and the City has received a total of
thirteen submissions before the deadline established in the Request for
Proposals; and
WHEREAS, a twelve member Selection Committee, appointed by the City
Manager, and chaired by Sergio Rodriguez, Director of the Planning Department,
has evaluated all qualified proposals; and said committee has personally
interviewed four consultant teams that submitted proposals; and subsequently
recommends any one of the most qualified providers: The Chesapeake Group;
Laventhol & Horwarth; or Zuchelli Hunter & Associates;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI,
FLORIDA:
Section 1. The recommendations are hereby accepted from the City Manager
and the Consultant Selection Committee concerning consultant selection for
I
preparation of an "Economic Study of the Miami River", and choosing the name of
one of the three most qualified providers as follows: zucbelli Hunter.
and Associates
Section 2. The City Manager is hereby authorized to enter into contract
negotiations similar to procedures contained in the Consultant's Competitive
Negotiations Ordinance in procuring the herein economic consultant's services
with the City Commission's choice as reflected in Section 1.
Section 3. The City Manager is hereby instructed to submit the negotiated
agreement to the Commission for approval prior to execution thereof.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of FEBRUARY
ATTEST:
a y irai, CITy Clerk
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
• 4M /
'o er ar
Chief Deputy y Attorney
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS:
je" ;;21.1 4wa(,.�
Lucia A. Dougherty, CityAttorney-
-2-
1986.
GCS �` "W
avi er L. Suarekt, Mayor
86-143
t
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM 62
Y
TO.The Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Commission
FROM:
Cesar H. Odio
City Manager
DATE: FEB 6 1986 FILE
SUBJECT. Consultant Selection for
"Economic Study of the Miami
River"
REFERENCE i ty Commission Meeting of
February 13, 1986
ENCLOSURES.
It is recommended that the City Commission,
based upon the recommendations of the Consultant
Selection Committee concerning services for the
preparation of an "Economic Study of the Miami
River", choose the name of any one of the three
most qualified providers: The Chesapeake Group;
Laventhol and Horwath; or Zuchelli Hunter &
Associates; and authorize the City Manager to
enter into contract negotiations with the City
Commission's choice and to submit the negotiated
contract to the commission for approval, per the
attached resolution.
Background
Resolution No. 85-736 dated July 18, 1985 authorized the issuance of a Request
for Proposals for the preparation of an "Economic Study of the Miami River".
The City Manager appointed Sergio Rodriguez, Director of Planinng Department, as
chairperson for the Selection Committee.
Funds for conducting the Economic Study are derived as follows:
* $35,000 Grant thru the Department of Environmental
Resources from the U.S. Department of Commerce,
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
$20,000 Dade County
$20,000 City of Miami 1984-85 Special Programs and
accounts; Matching Funds for Grants.
$75,000 TOTAL FUNDS IN PLACE
*The term of the agreement for the grant is from October 1, 1985, to September
30, 1986. Failure to comply with completion of the contract requirements prior
to September 30, 1986, may jeopardize the availability of those funds. An
application for continuation of this grant to be submitted in February, 1986,
to undertake a comprehensive growth management plan by the Planning Department
may be jeopardized as well.
Page 1 of 3
4 3
1i�
0
The Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Commission
Consultant Selection Process
On October 9, 1985, the City advertised publicly for a Request for Proposals. A
total of thirteen responses were submitted within the deadline of December 3,
1985. The selection committee met on December 4, 1985 to review the submissions
and short listed four respondents for oral presentations and interviews. The
interviews were held in a public meeting on December 13, 1985, following which
the selection committee evaluated the consultant teams according to the
Selection Criteria in the Request for Proposals and arrived at the
recommendation above of the three most qualified providers.
Evaluation Criteria
The Evaluation Criteria and the Selection Committee's evaluation of the
consultant proposals is attached in Appendix A.
Recommendation
The Selection Committee evaluated the consultant proposals according to the
Selection Criteria and arrived at the recommendation of the three most qualified
providers as follows:
Prime: The Chesapeake Group, Inc.
Subconsultants: Urban Information Associates
Real Property Research Group, Inc.
Albert R. Perez Associates
(latin minority owned)
Metric Engineering, Inc.
(latin minority owned)
Prime: Laventhol and Horwath
Subconsultants: Patricia Mellerson & Associates
(female/black minority owned)
Roma, Architects
Prime: Zuchelii Hunter Associates
Subconsultants: 8ermello, Kurki & Vera Inc.
(latin minority owned)
Page 2 of 3
I
a
The Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Commission
Selection Comrittee Members
Sergio Rodriguez, Chairman, Planning Department, Director
Frank Castaneda, Director of Community Development
Luis Jimenez, Chief, Inspection Services Division, Department of Fire, Rescue
and Inspection Services
Adrienne McBeth, Assistant to the City Manager, Minority Participation
Donald W. Cather, Director of Public Works
Arlene Weintraub, City Manager's Office, Special Projects Division
Sandra Sprunger Howard, Administrative Assistant, Miami River Management
Committee
Susan McKay, Parks and Recreation Department
Patrick O'Connor, Dade County, Assistant Director
Charles Blowers, Dade County, Planning Department
George Goode, Marine Council
Bernardo Fort Brescia, First Miami Developers
CHO/SR
i -
Page 3 of 3
s6-143
4
Evaluation Criteria
APPENDIX A
The following Evaluation Criteria was used by the Selection Committee to
evaluate consultant proposals. Percentages listed in the left hand column
indicate the maximum weight allowed upon each of the criteria.
The percentages listed in the three right hand columns indicate the average
weight placed on each of the criteria for each consultant team by the Selection
Committee.
SELECTION CRITERIA The Zuchelli
Chesapeake Laventhol Hunter &
Maximum Group & Horwath Associates
Weight
30% 1. PROPOSED STUDY DESIGN AND 22.83% 27.67% 18.92%
METHODOLOGY
25% 2. THE EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
OF THE FIRM, INCLUDING SPECIFIC
EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR STUDIES
15% 3. THE EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
OF THE STAFF ASSIGNED TO THE PROJECT
15% 4. PROVISIONS FOR COORDINATION OF THE
STUDY WITH THE TECHNICAL REVIEW
COMMITTEE
15% 5. EXTENT OF MINORITY PARTICIPATION
(LATIN & BLACK)
100% TOTAL
17.50% 21.42% 19.08%
10.92% 13.75% 10.17%
11.33% 14.08% 9.33%
10.17% 12.58% 10.33%
72.75% 89.50% 67.83%
86-143
rr —�
FORM 4 MEkADRANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT
LAST NAME —FIRST NAME —MIDDLE NAME
THE BOARD. COUNCIL,COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE ON
WHICH 1 SERVE IS A UNIT OF:
MAILING ADDRESS
3500 Pan American Drive
CITY COUNTY
Miami Dade
DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED
February 13, 1986
NAME OF BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE
® CITY O COUNTY D OTHER LOCAL AGENCY O STATE
NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OR STATE AGENCY
r
WHO MUST FILE FORM 4
This form is for use by any person serving on either an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee,
whether state or local, and it applies equally to members of advisory and non -advisory bodies who are faced with a voting conflict of
interest.
As the voting conflict requirements for public officers at the local level differ from the requirements for state officers, this form is divided
into two parts: PART A is for use by persons serving on local boards (municipal, county, special tax districts, etc.), while PART B is
prescribed for all other boards, i.e., those at the state level.
PART C of the form contains instructions as to when and where this form must be filed.
PART A
VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
[Required by Section 112.3143(3), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984).J
The Code of Ethics for Public Officers and Employees PROHIBITS each municipal, county, and other local public officer FROM
VOTING in an official capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from
knowingly voting in his official capacity upon any measure which inures to the special gain of any principal (other than a government
agency as defined in Section 112.312(2), Florida Statutes) by whom he is retained.
In any such case a local public officer must disclose the conflict:
(a) PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of his interest in the matter on which he is
abstaining from voting; and
(b) WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by describing the nature of his interest as a public record in this part below.
NOTE: Commissioners of a Community Redevelopment Agency created or designated pursuant to Section 163.356 or Section 163.357,
Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984), or officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one -acre, one -vote basis are not prohibited from
voting. In such cases, however, the oral and written disclosure of this part must be made.
I, the undersigned local public officer, hereby disclose that on F bruarV 1 , 19 _8.6—;
(a) I abstained from voting on a matter which (check one):
inured to my special private gain; or
inured to the special gain of ('` , by whom I am retained.
.� /4b �^r C�C� S d v,Q1.O�
jv__� " V
CE FORM 4 - REV. 1"4
PAGE
SIP
(b) The measure on which 1 abstained and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows:
Item 62 (R-86-143): Selection of Zuchelli Hunter and Assoc. for
preparation of the "Economic Study of the Miami River".
zft
Date Filed Signature
Please see PART C for instructions on when and where to file this form.
PART B
VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR STATE OFFICERS
[Required by Section 112.3143(2), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984).J
Each state public officer is permitted to vote in his official capacity on any matter. However, any state officer who votes in his official
capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain or the special gain of any principal by whom he is retained is required
to disclose the nature of his interest as a public record in Part B below within 15 days after the vote occurs.
1, the undersigned officer of a state agency, hereby disclose that on , 19
(a)1 voted on a matter which (check one):
inured to my special private gain; or
inured to the special gain of
by whom 1 am retained.
(b) The measure on which 1 voted and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows:
Date Filed
Signature
Please see PART C below for instructions on when and where to file this form.
PART C
FILING INSTRUCTIONS
This memorandum must be filed within fifteen (1 S) days following the meeting during which the voting conflict occurred with the person
responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who shall incorporate the memorandum in the meeting minutes. This form need not
be filed merely to indicate the absence of a voting conflict.
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES4112.31709113). A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY
BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT,
DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $5.000.
CE FORM 4. REV. 10-94
PAGE
0
1