HomeMy WebLinkAboutM-86-0170CITY OR MIAMI, FLQRIOA 12
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO' The Honorable Mayor and Members o"*L
of the City Commission
suutCT:
BROW Cesar H. Odio Rtf
City Manager cRCHus�
INCLOGUR921
February 20, 1986 MR:
Withdrawal of Application
Miami Center I Amendment to
Development Order
Approx 100 Chopin Plaza &
201-399 South Biscayne Boulevard
At the Planning Advisory Board meeting of February 19,
1986, the request to amend the Development Order for the
Miami Center I Project, located at approximately 100 Chopin
Plaza and 201-399 South Biscayne Boulevard, was withdrawn
by the applicant. This item was listed on the agenda only
because legal notice had been placed in the newspapers
prior to the withdrawal by the applicant.
GF:111
It. •a.. prrC[
]]C M.0 SOY .,CYUC
NEA •pa• YEA , a. .CC ^
: 2.2 370 a000
•ELEr .2e97a
C.
»G,4.NG
•[.ECOo E42.2 ee 23 .
.CS .NGC GCS Crr CE
eGG..EYUE pr ♦»( ..as Su •E SOT
,OS GC Its C., rCQN . OCTS'
2.3 — OCC
=A O'CS C. W.Ra
IW c O1O A.0 23G7
-E.ECO-t- �2 3, 553 .e..
w.S—G•ON 01-CE
1e27 • S*PEE, N W
w.S».NGrON o C 20
0
0
e
1202'e33,GaSO
CAD'
. NigGO
^EIECO-E4 -202 833-�092
BY HAND
SH EA & GO LD
BOI BRICKED AVENUE
MIAV, FLORIDA 33131
305 372 2OCC
-E.ECO--EM JCS 372 2C5e
February 27, 1986
Mr. Sergio Rodriguez
Director
Planning Department
City of Miami
P.O. Box 330708
Miami, Florida 33233=0708
Re: Miami Center I
Dear Sergio:
A.S. NG•CY .vC `.-t
. a.Y. NCW •70• 22
S a A.0 232C
•E,ECC- to e a 4.9 sa 2
Y[Wopo• BE•C•^ ^rr CE
aO NEweCo• C[N•E-
Y[w000•e[. .,.rc4Y .D2ee-
,s0 0303
at—
,GYpON w � SCB (YG,.YC
O .C3 as ]
.tit.
2eo.as
WRITER 5 DIRECT LINE
As you are aware, we have withdrawn our applications before
both the Planning Advisory Board and the Zoning Board for the
Biscayne Plaza Project. In addition, we will request a
continuance of this agenda item at the city commission hearing of
February 27, 1986, to the second commission hearing in March.
We have taken these steps based on our understanding of some
procedural and some substantive differences of opinion between the
applicant, Wirth & Company and the City. As of the date of this
letter, I believe that we have satisfactorily agreed on most of
the procedural issues. We have not, however, even begun to
discuss the substantive issues.
Specifically, we have yet to discuss the substantive
conditions to the Development Order as proposed by you in your
submission to t'-.^ .'lanning Advisory Board.
r
It is my understanding that we will be discussing these
matters at the meeting between the Planing Department, Wirth & T
Company and myself tomorrow at 10:00 A.M. I have enclosed, for
your review, proposed replacement language to your "Exhibit B" �-
Development Order addressing most of our substantive concerns.
SC-i 70
01
Ls, (lot 1.1)
Mr. Sergio Rodriguez
February 27, 1986
Page 2
After our discussion tomorrow, I hope to be able to discuss and
draft the necessary revisions to the resolution and your
"Exhibit A" Development Order which, according to my
understanding, should simply be a restatement of the City's
Resolutions No. 79-396 and 80-707.
I look forward to meeting with you tomorrow. If you have any
questions, please feel free to call.
Very truly yours,
r
Ethan P. Minsky
EPM:go
Enclosures
cc: Honorable Xavier Suarez
Mr. Cesar Odio
Mr. Walter Pierce
Mr. Joseph McManus
Mr. John Lefley
Richard E. Friend, Esq.
10
AW, Vrs
I
4W,%
4.
r
.. "
'' r ►• #
' -� �#�r i ...�. , r ��. h 1 • ..fir• �+ "'' _ .-
461
1-7
IN
". i.: wK. a '.: � _ ..1�� ` /i'•* ,++'' :/! �nt�a![,-
` ' " , i'�f�l,N %'~ r t s - '` •s}� � � � ,'fir
5 ' # far r•
„�. s -i r� i � •` a�/ �' • cif �� � � '� r 1 � •
4,4
� .�, � 1 I ,! it 1ii �•• i r ,; •.r E , �
N
i i I� , „