The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutO-10106J86-429 ORDINANCE NO. T 1 O 6 AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 9939, ADOPTED DECEMBER 20, 1984, AS AMENDED, THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT APPROPRIATIONS ORDINANCE, BY INCREASING THE APPROPRIATION FOR THE PROJECT ENTITLED: "SE OVERTOWN/PARK WEST REDEVELOPMENT - PHASE I" BY $4,108,400 FROM THE FOLLOWING REVENUE SOURCES: 1976 HOUSING G.O. BONDS - $1,900,000, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT SECTION 108 LOAN FUNDS- $1,208,400 AND SPORTS AND EXHIBITION r' AUTHORITY- $1,000,000; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. WHEREAS, the City Commission adopted Resolution No. 82-940 authorizing the approval of the Intergovernmental Cooperation Agreement between Metropolitan Dade County and the City of Miami for the Overtown Urban Initiative Project; and WHEREAS, the City Commission adopted Resolution No. 83-108 approving the submission of the Overtown Urban Initiative grant application to the Urban Mass Transit Administration (UTMA); and WHEREAS, these Resolutions called for the City to provide 85 percent of the local match and further required that the City pay to Metropolitan Dade County 85 percent of any funds which the grantee is required to pay from non- federal sources; and WHEREAS, $4,108,400 in additional appropriations may be necessary to cover the City of Miami's 85 percent share of certain costs involved in the Dade County versus William B. Sawyer condemnation proceedings (Circuit Court Case No. 84-2236) which involved the condemnation of certain parcels of land for the Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Project; and 0 0 WHEREAS, on July 19, 1995, the City Commission adopted Pesolution No. 85-742 authorizing the City Manager to accept a $5,95R,400 loan from the U.S. Dept. of HUD for use as "gap financing" in Community Development projects and suggested in the Resolution that these funds may he necessary to purchase several parcels of land in the Southeast Overtown/Park test Redevelopment Project Area; and WHEREAS, on February 13, 1986, the City Commission adopted Ord. A 10090 which appropriated $4,7500,000 of this loan to the SE Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Project; and WHEREAS, the remaining $1,2.08,400 needs to be appropriated to this project to cover additional costs of land acquisition; and WHEREAS, on October 25, 1983, the City Commission adopted Resolution No. 83-973 allocating up to $11,000,000 in City of Miami Housing General Obligation Bond proceeds for the acquisition of land for the development of affordable rental housing in the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Area; and WHEREAS, Ordinance #10080 appropriated $10,100,000 from 1976 Housing General Obligation Bonds for the aforementioned project; and WHEREAS, an additional $1,900,000 in 1976 Housing General Obligation Bond funds are needed to cover additional costs of land acquisition and associated expenses; and WHEREAS, the Miami Sports and Exhibition Authority has agreed to contribute up to $1,000,000 for acquisition of certain parcels of land for the aforementioned project; and WHEREAS, this Authority has already remitted to the City approximately $87 4 , 000 ; Page 2of4 NOW, THEREFORE, RE IT ORDAINED 13Y THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, F1_ORIDA: Section 1. Section 1 of Ordinance No. 9939, adopted December 20, 19R4, is hereby amended in the following particulars: 1! "Section 1. The following appropriations hereby made by use, fund and project title include previously authorized projects and fund appropriations for implementation of all municipal capital improvements of the City of Miami, Florida. The source of revenues to support the herein appropriations are hereby identified by fund and project: Total Appropriations ($ x 000) 3. Public Use COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT A. Capital Projects * * * k k k k k k 5. SE Overtown/Park West Redevelopment -Phase I 322029 (a) (b) $10,100-0 (c) (d) (e) (f ) $-4-, 7 50,.0 (g) $.-.A $22, 539.4 $ 2,100.0 - 1980 Highway G.O. Bonds $12,000.0 - 1976 Housing G.O. Bonds T"7,I017.7 - 1976 Housing G.O. Bonds - Interest $ 200.0 - 1980 Highway G.O. Bonds - Interest $ 181.0 - Community Dev. Block Grant--llth Yr. $ 5,958.4 - U.S. HUD Section 108 Loan TTM6-.0 - Sports and Exhibition Authority Section 2. All ordinances or parts of ordinances insofar as they are inconsistent or in conflict with provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 3. If any section, part of section, paragraph, clause, phrase or word of this ordinance is declared invalid, the remaining provisions of this ordinance shall not be affected. 1/Words and/or figures stricken through shall be deleted. Underscored words and/or figures shall be added. The remaining provisions are now in effect and remain unchanged. Asterisks indicate omitted and unchanged material. All figures are rounded to the nearest hundred dollars. Page 3 of 4 10106 • 4i PASSED AND ADOPTED BY May , 1986. XAVIER . UARE _ , ATTEST: MATTI HIRAI, CITY CLERK PLANNING REVIEW: 4S ODRIGUEZ, DIRECTOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT FINANCE REVIEW: CAR OS GARCIA, DIRECTOR FINANCE DEPARTMENT BUDGETARY REVIEW: TITLE ONLY this 22nd MANOHILI rNTT URANA, DIRECTOR DEPARARF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET LEGAL REVIEW: LA�'z -� - fv'� ROBERT F. CLARK CHIEF DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY day of I. Ilir:ii, (a.,! (,f t'.:�.• y of Mi-ni. Florid;i, i a i, !'-d { ,. t ,d ti;c of nl ,.,1 of said tills__!_ .---,!::. of ._ _- _.-- _ _ '__1. ;). 19.��2 :itv Clerk APPROVED A TO FORM AND CORRECTN y LUCIA A. DOUGHERTY CITY ATTORNEY Page 4 of 4 10106 i CITY OF MIAMI. FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO. Honorable Mayor and Members DATE. MAY 15 1966 FILE of the City Commission sue�Ec- COURT SETTLEMENT OVERTOWN URBAN INITIATIVE PROJECT FROM! REFERENCES - Cesar H. Odio UU City Commission City Manager ENCLOSURES. Agenda May 22nd It is recommended that the City Commission approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Manager to utilize herein designated sources of funding for the purpose of paying the required amount into the registry of the court in connection with the case of Dade County V. William B. Sawyer Ft Al Circuit Court ase - 2 Z 3 6, nvolving condemnation proceedings of property needed for the Overtown Urban Initiatives Project; further authorizing the City Manager to set aside all funds needed to satisfy the judgment rendered in said litigation in the event that the City Attorney determines that an appeal be filed fn said litigation. It is further recommended that City Commission approve the attached Emergency Ordinance appropriating an additional $4,108,400 (most of which has been previously allocated by resolution to the S.E. Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Project) to cover the increase cost of land acquired for this project. 10106 4 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission Page 2 On May 13, 1986 a verdict was received in the Circuit Court in the Case of Dade County VS. Sawyer (Case No. 84-2236). This case was filed in 1984 and involved the taking of 33 parcels in the Overtown Area. The City of Miami is liable for 8510 of all cost overruns in this project. Both Resolution 83-108, which approved the Overtown Urban Initiative Grant Application, and Resolution 82-940, which authorized the approval of the Intergovernmental Cooperation Agreement for the Overtown Urban Initiative Project, call for the City to provide 85b of the local match and further require that the City pay to the County 854 of any funds which the grantee is required to pay from non-federal sources. Dade County retained full responsibility for land acquisition. Dade County was the grant recipient and required the City to assume this liability prior to their acceptance of this Grant. The County was able to negotiate settlements on only 10 of the parcels prior to condemnation; an additional 11 parcels were settled during litigation. There were 21 parcels involved in the final Court settlement. The City of Miami is liable for an estimated $5,7 million in additionaT costs based on the J ury ver i ct. The offers of purchase made to the property owners in the Overtown Urban Initiative Area were based on appraisals prepared by Roger Budney, M.A.I., Moses Florence, Mark Quinlivan, M.A.I., Pat Mellerson and Norman Kurferst, M..A. I ., with review provided by S.Z. Bennett, M.A.I. These are all well qualified local appraisers who have been extensively utilized by Dade County in its acquisition programs. Appraised values ranged from approximately $4-$9 per sq. ft. (note Table A). The Overtown Urban Initiative Grant was for $6,770,670 matched by $1. 69 million from the City of Miami, Dade County and the State of Florida. The Order of Taking for the property occurred in September 1984 and the court hearing for value was held between April 21-May 12, 1986. The County entered the Court proceedings with a balance in the UMTA Grant of $Z.3 million which was sufficient for a 70% increase in value, far in excess of typical jury verdicts. IIN" n6 TABLE A Defendant's Land Area Coun ty's Aooriasal Yerdict Aooraisal Parcel/Owner sq. ft, S8 S6 S20 $20 $40 S20 01-02(Gilco) 7500 , $4 $7 S20 S20 S40 S25 1 01-03(Post) 7,500 $4 $8 SS $7 $30 $30 $40 S35 01-04(Stone) 30,000 $4 $25 $25 $40 $35 01-06(SY mon�tte)2 7,500 SS 28 $7 S25 $20 S30 S25 02-01(Sy manette) 22,500 $8 S7+ 54 $18 $15 $30 525 02-06(Yon 2ampt)3 7500 , $S $18 S5 $7 S $13 $30 S25 02-08(Post)4 7,500 S5 •SS $18 $20 $JO S35 02-15(Post) 7,500 $4 $7 24 $S $20 S20 $30 $35 OZ-16(Mitchell) 1,500 $4 31 • S30 S37 S40 S45 03-02(Post) 56,250 $4 $7+ $7 $7 $30 S37 $40 $45 03-03(Post)5 15,000 $4 S 7+ S7 $1 S30 S37 $40 345 03-04(Post) 3,750 $4 SS $30 S37 S40 $45 . OJ-05(Post) 7,500 $6 $7 $7 S30 s37 $40 S45 03-06(Pcst) 7,500 36 S7 $7 S30 $37 $40 S35 03-07(Post) 3,750 .S6 S1 $38 S42 $45 S45 04-01(Schussler) 30,000 'S4 $9 $10 $38 S42 $45 S45 7.500 $6 SS $9 $ $45 304-02(Schussler) 04-03(Rase) 67,500 $ $8 59 $28 $20 $45 S35 04-05(Sweeting) 5.000 $6 S8S6530 $30 $30 S45 S35 04-06(aI�^menthal) 2,500 $6 $S 37 $6 $30 $30 545 $45 04-07(Ma ida) 7,500 56 S8 _,. .� 55.0 $7.58 $7 SZ7 28.76 535.90 $36.66 AYERAGES 1 Purchased 6/82 3 Purchased 1/82 for 22 per sq. for $1.93 per ft- sq. ft. ft. Purchased 6181 4 Purchased 4/81 for $3.60 per for $2.80 per sq. sq. ft. ft. 5 Purchased 12/82 for $3.37 per sq- E �0106 • 0 Parcel/Owner Land Area 01-02 6ilco 7,500 01-03 Post/Y 7,500 01-04 Stone 30,000 01-06 Symonette 7,500 02-01 Symonette 22,500 02-06 Yon Zampt 7,500 02-08 Post/Y 7,500 02-IS Post/Y 7,500 02-16 Mitchell 15,000 03-02 Post/Y 56,250 01-03 Post/Y 15,000 03-04 Post/Y 3,750 03-05 Post/Y 7,500 03-06 Post/Y 7,500 03-07 Past/Y 3,750 04-01 Schuessler 30,000 04-02 Schuessler 7,500 04-03 Rose 7,500 04-OS Sweeting 5,000 04-06 Bernstein Z,500 04-01 Maida 7,500 County's i-xical TABLE 8 Yerdict Defendant's Aooraisal $60,000 $150,000 $150,000 $60,000 S150,000 $150,000 S240,000 $900,000 $900,000 $60.000 S187,500 $187.500 $165,000 SS62,500 $450.000 S52,500 $135,000 $112.500 $60,000 $135,000 S135,000 S52,500 S135,000 $150,000 S105,000 $300,000 $300,000 $513,800 $1,687,500 S2,081.250 $112.500 S450,000 $555,000 526,300 $112,500 $138,750 $87,000 $225,000 S277,500 $52,500 $225,000 $277,500 $26,300 $112,500 3138,750 $362,000 $1,140.000 $1,260,000 $60,000 5285,000 $315,000 S60,000 $210,000 $225.000 $40,000 $150,000 5150,000 $20,000 $75,000 $75,000 $60,000. $225,000 s2zS,000 $300,000 $300,000 $1,200,000 $300,000 S675,000 S225,000 $225,000 $225,000 $450,000 $2,250,000 S6,000,000 $300,000 $300,000 $1,350,000 $337,500 $337,500 SZZ5,000 5112,500 $337.500 $187.500 $187,500 S1,0SO,000 $262,500 S562,500 $187,500 $187,500 $262,500 S525,000 S2,531,300 $675,000 $168,800 $337,500* $337,500 $168,SOO $1.350,000 5337,500 SZ62,500 $175,000 $87,500 $337.500 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission Page 3 The former property owners had 3 appraisals prepared by appraisers from North and Central Florida. The average valuation ranged from $28.76 per sq. ft. to $36.66 per sq. ft. compared to the $7 appraisal utilized by Dade County for court purposes (note Tables A & B). The jury verdict averaged $27 per square foot for a total verdict of $7,552,500 (note Table C). This amount is four times the County's appraisal. Interest of lb a month on the additional award granted back to the date of taking (20 months) must be paid. This amount comes to $1„055,420. Legal fees and court costs are estimated at 25a of the settlement amount for a cost of $1,9 million. Under Florida law, the condemning body is liable for all legal fees and court costs. The City will be liable for 850 of these additional expenses for an approximate total of $2,5 million. TABLE C CONDEMNATION AWARD --REAL PROPERTY* MONIES REQUIRED Verdict $7,552,500 Less UMTA Deposit $2,275,400 BALANCE DUE $59277,100 - Less UMTA Balance $1,500,000 REMAINING BALANCE DUE $3,771,000 I: COUNTY PORTION (15%) $ 565,650 POTENTIAL CITY LIABILITY $3,205,350 (85%) *Additional costs for interest and legal fees not included f 10106 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission Page 3 The former property owners had 3 appraisals prepared by appraisers from North and Central Florida. The average valuation ranged from $28.76 per sq. ft. to $36.66 per sq. ft. compared to the $7 appraisal utilized by Dade County for court purposes (note Tables A & B). The jury verdict averaged $27 per square foot for a total verdict of $7,552,500 (note Table C). This amount is four times the County 's appraisal. Interest of lb a month on the additional award granted back to the date of taking (20 months) must be paid. This amount comes to $1„055,420. Legal fees and court costs are estimated at 25b of the settlement amount for a cost of $1,9 million. Under Florida law, the condemning body is liable for all legal fees and court costs. The City will be liable for 85110 of these additional expenses for an approximate total of $2,5 million. TABLE C CONDEMNATION AWARD --REAL PROPERTY* MONIES REQUIRED Verdict $7,552,500 Less UMTA Deposit $2,275,400 j BALANCE DUE $5,277,100 t i Less UMTA Balance $1,500,000 REMAINING BALANCE DUE $39771,000 COUNTY PORTION (15%) $ 565,650 POTENTIAL CITY LIABILITY $3,205,350 (85%) *Additional costs for interest and legal fees not included '1 0106 orm Honorable Mayor and Members of the Ci`y C0-.1 -'ss Page 4 The projected liability of the City under this award is approximately $5.7 million inclusive of all fees. This award is extremely excessive and far beyond values in the area. Prior to our acquisition, private sales in the area ranged from $4-$6 per sq. ft. and previous public acquisition through condemnation in this area ranged from $6-$10 per sq. ft. Table D denotes recent private sales in the area that occurred after plans for public acquisition were announced. Sales ranged from a $1.93 to $5.55 per sq. ft. Jury awards on these parcels ranged from 2250 to 1,293b above the purchase price within a two to three year, period with no improvements made to the property. These awards represent astronomical appreciation in property - far in excess of actual real estate trends. In adjacent Park West, appreciation has averaged 5-61. a year based on a study prepared for the City by Real Data Information Systems Incorporated. We have requested that Dade County initiate a Motion for New Trial and the City is investigating with Dade County the feasibility for filing an appeal. If an appeal is filed, the City is liable for 851. of additional interest costs (if not reduced) and legal fees. Table D JURY AWARDS FOR PROPERTIES PURCHASED UNDER THREAT OF CONDEMNATION (BASED ON 10/84 LAND VALUES) Parcel Date Number Owner Purchased Amount Paid Verdict Increased 01-03 Post/Y 6/82 $15,000 ($2 per sq. ft.) $150,000 1,000% 01-06 Symonette 1/82 $14,500 ($1.93 per sq. ft.) $187,500 1,293% 02-06 Von Zampt 6/81 $27,000 ($5.55 per sq. ft.) $135,000 500% 02-08 Post/Y 4/81 $60,000 ($2.80 per sq. ft.) $135,000 225% 02-15 Post/Y 4/81 $52,500 ($2.80 per sq. ft.) $135,000 2570.1 03-04 Post/Y 12/82 $50,000 ($3.33 per sq. ft.) $112,500 225% G Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission Page 5 It should be noted that the City has directly undertaken acquisition for 4.4 blocks in the Southeast Overtown/Park West Project area duri ng the last year and has been abl e to negoti ate the purchase of all but 4 of the 29 parcels within the designated acquisition area. The City initiated and fully the controlled acquisition program has come in under budget. (note Attachment 1). Under Florida law, all condemnation under the auspices of Florida Statute 163 are handled by Dade County which necessitates that the County handle the condemnation of property for community redevelopment purposes. The City has initiated the condemnation of 2 of the parcels for the Arena, and the County took possession of the property on May 9th. One of the acquisitions will be funded fully by the Miami Sports & Exhibition Authority (57-B) and it will be requested that the Authority cover all additional costs that may be incurred for Parcel 44-E. Quick take was initiated at the request of the Miami Sports & Exhibition Authority in order to meet the development schedule for the Arena provided to the City by the Miami Sports Authority. In order to cover the jury award, it is recommended that the following sources of funds be allocated for payment or in the event of an appeal that these funds be set aside until the appeal process is completed: 1. Remaining balance of 1976 G.O. Housing ................$1,200,000 Bonds allocated for land acquisition in S.E. Overtown/Park West. Reuse of parcels for which funds will be assigned will be restricted to rental housing under the provisions of the City of Miami Affordable Rental Housing Program. 2. Miami Sports & Exhibition Authority ........$1,000,000 acquisition assistance provided for Block 44 ($874,000 already remitted). 3. Balance of Section 108 Loan......... ................$2,200,000 funds not encumbered, application being amended tentative approval obtained by HUD Regional Office. 4. Approved CDBG funds (7th Year) ....................... $200,000 allocated for S.E. Overtown/Park West land acquisition. 5. Unencumbered 1976 G.O. Housing Bond Funds............ $912,500 originally allocated for Scattered Site Program (a balance of approximately $3.5 million remains). TOTAL 1 $5,712,500 1OI06 Page 6 All but $912,500 in funding will be from funding sources already allocated to the S.E. Overtown/Park West Project. This proposed funding package will significantly impact the S.E. Overtown/Park West Project but will allow for Phase I Redevelopment to move forth. These impacts will include: i - the postponement of the acquisition of Camillus House. The removal of this facility from the Park West Area is essential to upgrade.the image of the area. An offer was made to purchase the property in June of 1985; to date the City has not received a wri tten response. - the postponement of the acquisition of two vacant parcels on Block 25. (The City has completed the remaining acquisition of i the block 25; development of this site is not scheduled for at least 3 years). - the postponement of the acquisition of the historic Lyric Theatre and adjacent properties along the east side of N.W. 2nd Ave. between N.W. 8th and 9th Streets (Block 36). These parcels are adjacent to property previously purchased by the City and are all vacant. Over 5010 of the site was cleared after the 1980 ci vi l disturbances. - the elimination if the potential reprogramming of the 1976 G.O. Housing Bonds proposal for utilization of subordinate financing for Phase I developers. We are submitting a UDAG Application for the June round which may preclude the need for subordinate local financing. - will necessitate the City to cover the annual interest costs for the HUD Section 108 loan for an estimated $393,000 for 1987 and 1988. Original funding was from the loan directly, potential funding sources will be from the Tax Increment Trust Fund or from 13th and 14th Year CDBG funds. Interim financing for the payment of this award may be temporarily funded from Community Development through the float program. It is recommended that the attached Resolution and Emergency Ordinance be approved. CHO/MDS/es Attachments 10106 e i 0 Southeast Overtown/Park West BLOCK 24 Redevelopment Project Acquisition Cost Settlement Price 'lbtal llelecatirn L i�looati,rn Eft• Dai0litim F.lt. Asoellanea� `If1ipL, 16rcel. D�r's Nme 9q. �j. I 3 Bldg Fixiawe Ball tom. 24-A Mx & Haim 22,500 $360, 000 $�5, 000 $0 $33, 750 �, ?50 $0 $5,000 52,000 2,518 W18,268 0 115 $141, Fi15 a143 :SS ac va Rpai-r 7,500 120,000 0 0 8,500 125, 500 13, 000 24-C J. Ard!Urn & 60,000 960,000 460,000 64,254 73, 5C0 1,557,754 19,387 5, " 36,000 6,379 $1, 624, 521J J. Vh..11 24- D R�-1, Inc 30,150 480,000 20,000 1, 480 27,500 529, 9E� �� 0 3,000 73 $542.063 30,150 4432, 400 0 0 26,620 509,020 31,220 0 30, o00 7, 492 $577, 722 24-£ R3ric A R3rtrPrs 21-F A. 33,000 430,000 237,000 18,490 38, 350 773, M 20, 000 25,000 31,2U0 93 $850,133 12. l�d�rria �l 183, 300 $2, EB2, 400 caV, 000 $B4, 224 $308, 220 $4,1 %, 844 $93, W7 $35, 000 $152, 200 $16, 660 $4, 454, 311 I Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Project Acquisition Cost BLOCK 25 Parm1 04AM"S Nme S4. Etg. Land Bais Total Mcwtim 1'$tlnlitfA lblOmtirn E dA 1awhticll EMME�tad hh--"AJY Lxs IDIAL lib. 25-B Car-Ilr Ibiter �A are C hAim 15,000 $39, 500 $138, 500 0 $11, 060 23, OQ3 0 0 1,740 $183, 060 29,740 132, C00 6,050 17, CCO 72, 858 416, 7c-8 25-C Shirley Aaa3 7,500 34,000 3,500 3,700 41,200 32, OQO 0 2,500 1,541 77, '- LL 254�-E A.L. 91mi-ette 17,500 1f31050 6,050 0 65 A, LE x5 25-F W B C 4,650 21,COD 0 0 2,100 23,100 0 0 0 1,618 25-G T-e Big War, (b. 15, 000 75,000 0 0 6,750 81,750 0 0 0 0 £31, 1 w 25-ti R�h�1d Bann 7, JJD 0 U 0 0 65 65 25-I hU43 d Aldrich + J 7,500 34,000 56,000 0 18,000 10B4O00 64,50) 7,000 65 171-11, `4� 5 25-%J Ft. laxi3rda1 e 7,500 5,800 76,700 5,240 6,625 94,365 W1000 9,736 9, CCO 2,046 2A, L,11 Investmht Inc. Z)-( Imiard Davis 15,000 67,500 0 0 5,675 73,375 0 0 0 0 73,375 334,550 2L,E136 35,500 78,258 1,110,7.34 Total 97,150 $334,800 $274,700 $B,940 $52,150 $6M,590 BLOCK 37 Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment ProjecL Acquisition Cost ISettldment Price 1.'ixture LbIs `Ibtal ]acati,� 1�L. Rdomtim E i . Ct'1 Ct,rYs's I� -F't- Lr'�rti �� Fir bb. 37- A MR Hxje arria 3,750 $52, 000 $2% 000 $520 $6, 500 $87, 020 37-B Miak Cash Roster 17,750 251,CD 96,OOC) 13,933 21,500 415,493 37-C Paul Bairn 26,250 420, C00 9),723 29, 32-1 23,486 577, 527 37-D Inns Laverne 15,000 240,000 145,000 4,6W 21,750 411,430 31-E qzai� 91,154 1,510,000 655,200 87,979 lja2,721 2,415,900 1 37-G alsan 143ristariy 37-1i Ban rind 1i fnsi 7,500 120, OOO 5,000 2B, 900 8, 750 162, 650 37-1 LiPun3k R"ine 13, 5(D 220, Wo L30, ODO 8, 318 20,000 378,318 177,9CA $2,846,000 $1,15B,920 $173,Ill $X9,707 $4,448,338 10l� O _ O 0 2, 7O0 2, 5W 3,652 95,872 0 10,000 4,143 439,636 l0,OJ0 0 35, 7LI 25, C00 13,677 651, `� 10,000 15,220 20,E 15 456, t65 0 30, � 65 2, 545, `-65 1D0,000 0 17,OUD 65 17,U65 0 0 25,000 65 5o'CM 25,000 0 23,344 7,000 1, L39 194,133 10,000 9,0w 29,000 115 417,433 $155, 000 ,%5, 9E3; $L%, 500 $22, 936 $4, E3Ei3, 751) is a Southeast Overtown/Park West .� Redevelopment Project Acquisition Chart II I l Settlement Price rR)tal lle]ocatial 0-.t. wlomticn amol1tim Wit. I Y19C. ower � s Nme $4. Ftg. laid +�"'� F7Xt11r@ l b- 44-A Victor Maz & IIisa 6,750 $135,000 $1,750 $7,2W $91250 $153,218 $ lm,000 $14,812 $6,000 $3,%3 1 44--$ liTato/ lbdlel (331]0 6,750 120, 000 1,000 0 8,550 $129,550 0 0 0 0 j 44 C Vidnr Diaz22, 50l) 360,030 15,000 21,215 20,500 $416, 715 10, 000 1, 000 u' 000 65 RLI- 22, 500 360,000 200,000 29,065 30,500 $6119, 565 145, 000 0 40,000 2, W2 49-D Iq?wial. 75,000 0 45,000 � 44E Art CMft 37,800 59,000 1,020,000 0 0 85,000 $1,105,000 0 0 2,000 65 � 44-P' 1arcb 1 44-•G Zwliami R3sax- Missim 7, 000 127,500 9l), 000 37,076 13,375 267,951 �.950 p 12,000 65 $94,574 $167,175 $2,691,999 $734,950IUML $ L5, M $126, 000 162,300 $2,122,500 $307,750 M 1 � G C�3 BLOCK 44 r $361, 5)3 $12`,550 $448, 7W 427 $IW! 065 $1,107,065 $600 966 $3, 575, elf i I* IM: _,, III SUMMARY SHEET Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Project Acquistion Cost Tlbtal Iblocati,cn E q>xidEd Peic 3tim fit. Darb tim Hit. hti mPl larieais `III11AI, BMX c�• �• Ir7CYj BkIg FLXt11iL $3-)-1S rb. .i i 44 162,300 $2,122,500 $307,750 $94,574 $167,175 $2,691,999 *15,812 W34,950 $126,000 $6,685 $3,575,446 Zj 97 150 , $304,800 $274,700 $8,910 $52,150 $690,590 $21,836 $334,550 $35,500 $'M,258 $1,110,734 37 177,904 $2,846,000 $1,158,920 $173,711 $269,707 $4,448,338 $155,000 $155,000 $87,500 $21,552 $4,190,063 1 24 180,300 $2,8B2,400 $962,000 434,224 $208,2� $4,156,844 $93,607 $35,000 $152,200 $16,600 $4,454,311 .1 3 i $2�0 2$239,925 i $1,259,500 $'101,ZOU ,9aD $13,570,37� Ti-al 617,654 $B, 155,700 $2,723,370 $361,449 §�fl7,252 $11,937,771 *286,255 -__ -- O O C� . _ _._ 00 40 MIAMI REVIEW AND DAILY RECORD Published Daily except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays Miami, Dade County, Florida. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF DADE. Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Sookie Williams, who on oath says that she is the Vice President of Legal Advertising of the Miami Review and Daily Record, a daily (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) newspaper, published at Miami In Dade County, Florida; that the attached _ copy of advertisement, being a Legal Advertisement of Notice In the matter of CIT`I OF MIAMI Re : ORDINANCE NO . 10106 in the ........... .. P.X.. X .................... Court, was published in said newspaper in the 15SUee of June 2, 1986 Afflant further says that the said Miami Review and Daily Record is a newspaper published at Miami in said Dade County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Dade County, Flonda, each day (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Miami In said Dade County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement: and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor mired airy person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, mmission or re for the purpose of secunng this adwrtl ment for on - a said newspaper. .............. Sworn to and pubsobed before me this CITY OF MIAMI DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA LEGAL NOTICE All interested persons will take notice that on the 22nd day of May. 1986, the City Commission of Miami, Florida, adopted the following titled ordinance(s): �� J Ln e ; 86 ? jXCi `y`A.D. 19....... Get, V. Ferbsyre f 'a� tit c", late of Florida at Large (SEAL) My Commission expires July 9, 1986. MR 114 ORDINANCE NO. 10104 AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 9939, ADOPTED DECEMBER 20, 1984. AS AMENDED, THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT APPROPRIATIONS ORDINANCE, BY ESTABLISHING A NEW CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ- ECT ENTITLED: "OLYMPIC SAILING AND TRAINING CEN- TER-, APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THIS PROJECT IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000 FROM THE DINNER KEY ENTERPRISE FUND; AND BY INCREASING THE APPROPRIATIONS FOR TWO AND PROJECTS ENTITLED: "DESIGN PLAZA STREET IMPROVEMENT" AND "NORTH RIVER DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS" IN THE AMOUNTS OF $220,000 AND $400,000, RESPECTIVELY, FROM 1980 HIGHWAY GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS AND 1970 AND 1978 STORM SEWER GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. ORDINANCE NO. 10105 AN ORDINANCE CREATING A NEW DEPARTMENT TO BE KNOWN AS THE HOUSING CONSERVATION AND DEVEL. OPMENT AGENCY; PRESCRIBING THE RESPONSIBILITIES, FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE NEWLY CREATED DEPARTMENT; FURTHER PROVIDING FOR THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS, PERSONNEL, RECORDS AND EQUIPMENT CURRENTLY BUDGETED IN THE BUDGET OF THE DEPART- MENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOR THE HOUS- ING DIVISION; REPEALING IN ITS ENTIRETY PARAGRAPH (5) OF SECTION 2.178 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI FLORIDA, AS AMENDED; CONTAINING A REPEALER PRO- VISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. ORDINANCE NO. 10106 AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 9939, ADOPTED DECEMBER 20, 1984, AS AMENDED, THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT APPROPRIATIONS ORDINANCE, BY INCREASING THE APPROPRIATION FOR THE PROJECT ENTITLED: "SE OVERTOWNIPARK WEST REDEVELOPMENT. PHASE I" BY $4,108,400 FROM THE FOLLOWING REVENUE SOURCES: 1976 HOUSING G.O. BONDS — $1,900,000, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVEL- OPMENT SECTION 108 LOAN FUNDS — $1,208,400, AND SPORTS.AND EXHIBITION AUTHORITY — $1.000,000; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERABIL ITY CLAUSE. ORDINANCE NO. 10107 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF ORDINANCE NO. 9500,THEZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING SECTION 3513, ENTITLED "FAIL- URE OF CITY COMMISSION TO ACT," OF ARTICLE 35, ENTI- TLED "AMENDMENTS," BY EXTENDING THE TIME LIMITS IN WHICH THE CITY COMMISSION HAS TO ACT ON LEGIS- ATION RECEIVED REPEALER PROP SRON AND A SEVERABILITY OM LOWER BOARDS; OCLAUSEG A ORDINANCE NO. 10108 ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 9500, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, BY AMENDING ARTICLE 15. SPI-SPECIAL PUBLIC INTEREST DISTRICTS, SECTION 1520. SPI.2 COCONUT GROVE CEN. TRAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, SUBSECTION 1526.3 MINI- MUM OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS, TO DELETE REFER- ENCE TO A "COMMON WALL" AND SUBSTITUTE THEREFORE "PROPERTY LINE"; ARTICLE 20, GENERAL AND SUPPLE- MENTARY REGULATIONS, SECTION 2003. ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES, SUBSECTION 2003.7. CONVENIENCE ESTABLISHMENTS AS ACCESSORY TO RESIDENTIAL OR OFFICE USES, BY ADDING AN INTENT STATEMENT, SUB- SECTION 2003.7.4. LIMITATIONS ON SIZE OF RESTAURANTS AS ACCESSORY CONVENIENCE ESTABLISHMENTS, BY AMENDING THE TITLE, ADDING ADDITIONAL CRITERIA BY ESTABLISHING A SPECIAL RESTAURANT CATEGORY, LIM- ITING EXISTING USES AND BY REVISING THE FORMULA FOR COMPUTING THE MAXIMUM SIZE OF, AND SEATING IN, RESTAURANTS; AND BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, PAGE 3, RO.3 RESIDENTIAL -OFFICE, PRINCIPLE USES AND STRUCTURES, TO REFORMAT THE LANGUAGE BETWEEN PERMITTED AND PERMISSIBLE USES FOR CLARITY; PAGE 4, CR-2 COMMERCIAL -RESIDENTIAL (COMMUNITY), PRINCIPLE USES AND STRUCTURES, TO GENERALLY PERMIT RADIO AND TELEVISION STUDIOS, PROVIDING FURTHER THAT RADIO AND TELEVISION STUDIOS WITH EXTERIOR ANTENNAE ARE PERMISSIBLE ONLY BY WPETjAL PERMIT: PAGE 5, IIUNAL TURES AND REQUIREMENTS, TO PROVIDE THAT CERTAIN SPECIFIED USES MUST OBSERVE A. 50 FOOT TRANSITIONAL AREA WHERE THEY ADJOIN RS-I, RS-2, RG, RO AND 0.1 DISTRICTS, PROVIDING THAT REDUCTION OF THE TRANSITIONAL AREA IS PERMISSIBLE BY SPECIAL PER- MIT, PROVIDING LIMITATIONS; AND CBD 1 CENTRAL BUST NESS DISTRICT, PRINCIPLE USES AND STRUCTURES, TO GENERALLY PERMIT WHOLESALE JEWELERS AND JEW- ELRY FABRICATION AND PRQDUCTION SUBJECT TO WMI- TATIONS AND EXIGEPTIQNS AND DELETING THE CORRESPONDING LANGUAGE UNDER ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES, AND PAGE 6, 1.1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, PRINCIPAL USES AND STRUCTURES, TO GENERALLY PER- MIT AUTOMOTIVE TOWING SERVICES, SUBJECT TO LIMI- TATIONS, CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A Afflant further says that the said Miami Review and Daily Record is a newspaper published at Miami in aald Dade County, Florida, and that the sold newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Dade County. Florida, each day (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holldays) and has been entered as second class mail matter at the poet office n Miami In said Dade County, Florida. for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and afflant further says that she has nefther paid nor pprroomiaW any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, tommission or refypd for the purpose of securing this advertl/siment for pgbtiaatfon In a said newspaper. Sworn to and`�AubsObed before me this 2 u d 1 J Lori e I jn ty D♦ ........ .. r .. j .. , A.O. 19 ....... ts(ef'i V. Ferbeyro fVpta�PutiUc..3lats of Florida at Large (SEAL) My Commission expires July 9, 1986. MR 114 V . CONIAININCi A fAt DEALER PH(WISION Atli) A SLVFIAAB1L ITY CLAUSE ORDINANCE NO. 10107 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXT OF ORDINANCE NO. 9500. THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING SECTION 3513. ENTITLED "FAIL- URE OF CITY COMMISSION TO ACT." OF ARTICLE 35. ENTI- TLED "AMENDMENTS," BY EXTENDING THE TIME LIMITS IN WHICH THE CITY COMMISSION HAS TO ACT ON LEGIS- LATION RECEIVED FROM LOWER BOARDS: CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. ORDINANCE NO. 10108 ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 9500, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, BY 86 AMENDING ARTICLE 15. SPI-SPECIAL PUBLIC INTEREST DISTRICTS, SECTION 1520. SPI-2 COCONUT GROVE CEN- TRAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, SUBSECTION 1526.3 MINI- MUM OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS, TO DELETE REFER- ENCE TO A "COMMON WALL" AND SUBSTITUTE THEREFORE "PROPERTY LINE"; ARTICLE 20. GENERAL AND SUPPLE- MENTARY REGULATIONS, SECTION 2003. ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES, SUBSECTION 2003.7. CONVENIENCE ESTABLISHMENTS AS ACCESSORY TO RESIDENTIAL OR OFFICE USES, BY ADDING AN INTENT STATEMENT, SUB- SECTION 2003.7.4. LIMITATIONS ON SIZE OF RESTAURANTS AS ACCESSORY CONVENIENCE ESTABLISHMENTS, BY AMENDING THE TITLE, ADDING ADDITIONAL CRITERIA BY ESTABLISHING A SPECIAL RESTAURANT CATEGORY, LIM- ITING EXISTING USES AND BY REVISING THE FORMULA FOR COMPUTING THE MAXIMUM SIZE OF, AND SEATING IN, RESTAURANTS; AND BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, PAGE 3, RO.3 RESIDENTIAL -OFFICE, PRINCIPLE USES AND STRUCTURES, TO REFORMAT THE LANGUAGE BETWEEN PERMITTED AND PERMISSIBLE USES FOR CLARITY; PAGE 4, CR•2 COMMERCIAL -RESIDENTIAL (COMMUNITY), PRINCIPLE USES AND STRUCTURES, TO GENERALLY PERMIT RADIO AND TELEVISION STUDIOS, PROVIDING FURTHER THAT RADIO AND TELEVISION STUDIOS WITH EECCEXTERIOR IMu1ANTENNAE ARE LE CG 2 GENERALICOMMERCIAL, TRANBiAfUNAL TURES AND REQUIREMENTS, TO PROVIDE THAT CERTAIN SPECIFIED USES MUST OBSERVE A 50 FOOT TRANSITIONAL AREA WHERE THEY ADJOIN RS•1, RS-2, RG, RO AND 0.1 DISTRICTS, PROVIDING THAT REDUCTION OF THE TRANSITIONAL AREA IS PERMISSIBLE BY SPECIAL PER MIT, PROVIDING LIMITATIONS; AND CBD•1 CENTRAL BUSI NESS DISTRICT, PRINCIPLE USES AND STRUCTURES, TO GENERALLY PERMIT WHOLESALE JEWELERS AND JEW ELRY FABRICATION AND PRODUCTION SUBJECT TO LIMI- TATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS AND DELETING THE CORRESPONDING LANGUAGE UNDER ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES, AND PAGE 6, 1.1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, PRINCIPAL USES AND STRUCTURES, TO GENERALLY PER- MIT AUTOMOTIVE TOWING SERVICES, SUBJECT TO LIMI- TATIONS, CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. CATTY HIRAI City Clerk Guv n1 Miami, Florida (k A. qAMt� �..