Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem #38 - Discussion ItemCITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA `- A= INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM so .d _4 TO. Honorable Mayor and DATE: July 24, 1986 FILE: Members of the City Commission' SUBJECT: Recent legislative enactments ` affecting City litigation R FROM Lucian A. Dougherty REFERENCES: City Attorney ENCLOSURES: The 1986 Florida Legislature enacted the following statutes e which impact on the defense of lawsuits filed against the City for damages either in tort or in contract. Chapter 768, Florida Statute has been augmented by the creation of Part III thereunder, consisting of Sections 768.71 - 768.81. These statutes are subordinate and supplementary to other statutory provisions which may be applicable. These statutes take effect on July 1, 1986 and are only applicable to causes of action that accrue thereafter. Sections not included below are not applicable to the City. 768.74 Remittitur and additur. " This section sets forth criteria for the court to consider when deciding whether to reduce or increase a "< verdict. Specifically, it states a clear legislative -: intent to vest the trial courts with the discretionary authority to review the amounts of damages awarded by the trier of facts in light of a standard of excessiveness or inadequacy. 768.75 optional settlement conference in certain tort actions. The court may require a settlement conference to be held at least 3 weeks before the date set for trial. 768.76 Collateral sources of indemnity. This section provides for reduction of awards by collateral sourcest clearly excepting reductions for collateral sources for which a subrogation right exists. It also requires the plaintiff's attorneys fees to be based on the net amount of the award after adjustment for collateral sources. In our case, plaintiffs attorneys fee would be 25% of such net amount. .17/SC vSS/'p Al Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission July 24, 1986 Page 2 768.77 Itemized verdict. This section requires an itemized verdict form which distinguishes between economic and noneconomic losses as well as past and future damages. Economic future damage must be reduced to present value. 768.78 Alternative methods of payment of damage awards. This section provides that in actions for personal injury or wrongful death, special damages (economic losses) exceeding $250,000 must be paid according to a structured payment schedule (periodic payments). If an award of future damages has been structured and the claimant dies prior to the last payment, the lump sum payment to his estate of any remaining liability would be required to be reduced to present value. Since the provisions of this section establish an amount greater than our statutory cap, the City of Miami is not directly affected by this section. 768.79 Offer of judgment and demand for judgment. This section provides for attorneys fees and costs to be awarded against a party who does not improve upon an y offer of judgment by at least 25%. This requires the City to adopt a policy of filing an offer if judgment prior to each case going to trial. 768.80 Determination of noneconomic damages. This section limits awards for pain and suffering to no more than $450,000 per person. This provision applies to all causes of action filed on or after July 1, 1986. Even though the statutory cap of $100,000 per person still applies to the City, plaintiffs may obtain the maximum as provided for in this seciton and then file a Claims Bill in the Legislature for the difference. �' """74 " F3 h� Honorable Mayor and July 24, 1986 Members of the City Commission Page 3 768.81 Comparative fault. This section provides that the doctrine of joint and several liability shall remain in effect for all cases in which the total amount of damages does not exceed twenty-five thousand dollars. For those exceeding this amount, the doctrine is repealed for general or noneconomic damages. The doctrine is also repealed for All, special or economic damages with respect to a particular defendant if the plaintiff is more at fault than the defendant. The doctrine's repeal does not apply to an action to recover actual economic damages based on pollution, intentional torts, legal actions, land or security fraud actions or actions based on anti-trust violations. 794/LAD/JLF/gfa