Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-86-0828J-86-537 10/7/66 RESOLUTION NO. 86-828 A RESOLUTION AMENDING A DEVELOPMENT ORDER (RESOLUTION 79-396; MAY 24, 1979, AS f AMENDED) FOR THE MIAMI CENTER I PROJECT, A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT, PROPOSED BY MIAMI CENTER JOINT VENTURE, AND LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 100 CHOPIN PLAZA AND APPROXIMATELY 201-399 S. BISCAYNE BOULEVARD BEING TRACT D, DUPONT PLAZA (50-11); INCORPORATING THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL; MAKING FINDINGS, APPROVING SAID PROJECT SUBJECT TO THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER PERTAINING TO THE ENTIRE SITE; FURTHER, •ADDING CONDITIONS PERTAINING ONLY TO THE SOUTHERN 3.01 ACRES OF THE SUBJECT SITE KNOWN AS "ONE DUPONT PLAZA" (FORMERLY KNOWN AS "BISCAYNE PLAZA") PHASES 1 AND 2- AND APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE SUBJECT PROJECT KNOWN AS ONE DUPONT PLAZA PHASES 1 AND 2; FURTHER, DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO RECORD AND SEND COPIES OF THE HEREIN RESOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT ORDER TO AFFECTED AGENCIES AND THE DEVELOPER. WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting held on May 16; 1979, Item #1, following an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB-23- 79 by a 7 to 0 vote (1 member absent), recommending approval of the Development Order for the Ball Point Project, (AKA Miami Center I project), a Development of Regional Impact; and WHEREAS, Holywell Corporation proposed the undertaking of the Ball Point Project (AKA Miami Center I project) a Development of Regional Impact, as defined by Chapter 22F-2, Rules of the State of Florida Department of Administration, located within the City of Miami, on a tract of land containing approximately 8.46 acres located on the North bank at the mouth of the Miami River, comprised of 928,200 square feet of gross office space; 630 hotel units in a structure containing 550,000 square feet of gross hotel space; 600 dwelling units in two towers containing 865,700 square feet of gross residential space; 75,000 square feet of gross space for retail use; and 2,565 parking spaces; and WHEREAS, Holywell Corporation submitted a complete Application for Development Approval for a Development of Regional Impact to the South Florida CITY COMMSSION RXEMIG or OCT I we 101 Regional Planning Council pursuant to Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes, and did receive a favorable recommendation for a proposed development order on May 7, 1979, as set forth in the Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council; and WHEREAS, the Application for Development Approval, as reviewed by the South Florida Regional Planning Council, referred to an office building with 928,200 square feet of gross office space; a hotel structure with 550,000 gross square feet, two condominium towers with 865,700 gross square feet and a parking structure with 2,560 parking spaces; and WHEREAS, Holywell Corporation complied with all the requirements set forth in Ordinance No. 8290 by appearing before the City of Miami Planning Advisory Board; and WHEREAS, the City Commission considered the Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council dated May 7, 1979 and each element required to be considered by Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the Ball Point Project, as originally proposed by the Holywell Corporation in 1979, complied with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, was consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complied with local and development regulations, being then the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 6871; and WHEREAS, the Ball Point Project did not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami; and WHEREAS, the Ball Point Project was consistent with the Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council and did not unreasonably interfere with any of the considerations and objectives set forth in Chapter 380, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the Miami Zoning Board, on May 21, 1979, granted a variance from the 300 foot height limit and granted Conditional Use approval for parking uses as allowed in Ordinance No. 6871, the then -Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance for the City of Miami; and WHEREAS, the City Commission determined that all requirements of publication and other legal requirements for the issuance of the proposed Development Order had been compiled with; and WHEREAS, the City Commission deemed it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami to issue a Development Order for -2- I , the Ball Point project (AKA Miami Center I project) a Development of Regional Impact; and WHEREAS, the Miami City Commission, by Resolution 79-396; May 24, 1979, issued a Development Order, attached hereto as Exhibit "A", approving with modifications, the Ball Point Project (AKA Miami Center I project) a Development of Regional Impact, as proposed by Holywell Corporation for Tract D, DUPONT PLAZA (50-11), which project was limited to 928,200 square feet of gross office space; 630 hotel units in a structure containing 550,000 square feet of gross hotel space; 500 dwelling units in two towers containing 865,700 square feet of residential space; 75,000 square feet of gross retail use and 2,565 parking spaces; and WHEREAS, the Miami City Commission by Resolution 80-707; September 25, 1980, amended the Development Order (Resolution 79-396; May 24, 1979) by amending paragraph 7 of Exhibit "A" to provide that the Holywell Corporation reach agreement on interim traffic improvements prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy rather than prior to issuance of a building permit and, further finding that this amendment did not constitute a substantial deviation from the terms of the Development Order (Resolution 79-396; May 24, 1979) ; and WHEREAS, the development on the north area of the site described in Exhibit "E", ("Miami Center Existing") has been largely completed; and a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued, subject to a restrictive covenant addressing remaining conditions in the Development Order; and WHEREAS, the Miami Center Joint Venture ("Applicant"), successors in interest to the Holywell Corporation, had proposed amending the Development Order to change the development allowed on the southern 3.01 acres of the site (more particularly described on Exhibit "F" attached hereto and now known as "One Dupont Plaza"); claiming that such amendment did not constitute a substantive deviation; and WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, on February 6, 1985, by a 6 to 0 vote recommended that the amendments constituted substantial deviations to be referred to the South Florida Regional Planning Council; and WHEREAS, Mr. Frank Callahan, Chairman, South Florida Regional Planning Council, in a letter to then Miami Mayor Maurice Ferre, dated February 21, 1985, stated that the proposed amendments constituted a substantial deviation according to Chapter 380.06(17) F.S.; that the Council would appeal any -3- decision of the City to the contrary, and urged the applicant to submit an amended Application for Development approval to the Council and City; and WHEREAS, on March 28, 1985, in pubic hearing before the Miami City Commission, the applicant withdrew the item; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 380.06 (17)(a) F.S. (1983) the amendments proposed by the applicant constituted a substantial deviation from terms of the previously issued Development Order; and WHEREAS, Applicant has submitted an amended Application for Development Approval for a Development of Regional Impact for the entire 8.46 acre site of the Miami Center I project on July 11, 1985, more particularly described in Exhibit "D" attached hereto, to the South Florida Regional Planning Council pursuant to Chapter 380.06 F.S. Said application requests changes on only the One Dupont Plaza project site by deleting the previously approved two towers comprising 500 dwelling units of 865,700 square feet of gross residential building area and 1,220 parking spaces and substituting the following therefor: two mixed use towers comprising 150 dwelling units of 300,000 gross square feet and 220,000 gross square feet of commercial use; 1,480,000 gross square. feet of office use and retaining 1200 parking spaces, altogether comprising 2,600,000 gross square feet; and WHEREAS, the South Florida Regional Planning Council, on February 3, 1986, recommended approval, with conditions, of the proposed revised project "One Dupont Plaza", as set forth in the Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council, dated February 4, 1986; attached as Exhibit "C" and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, Applicant has complied with all the requirements set forth in Ordinance 9500, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami pertaining to the southern 3.01 acres of the site; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has considered the Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council dated February 4, 1986 and each element required to be considered by Chapter 380.06 F.S.; and WHEREAS, the One Dupont Plaza project complies with the City of Miami Comprehensive Weighborhood Plan, is consistent with the orderly development of the City of Miami, and complies, as to the northerly 5.45 acres of the site known as "Miami Center Existing" (Exhibit "E"), with local and land development regulations and complies, as to the southerly 3.01 acres of the site known as "One Dupont Plaza" (Exhibit "F"), Phases 1 and 2, with local WHEREAS One D , peat Plaza does not unreason interfere with the achievement of the jectives of the adopted Stat sand Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami; and WHEREAS the One Dupont Plaza is consistent with the Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council (February 4, 1986) and does not unreasonably interfere with any of the considerations and objectives set forth in Chapter 380 F.S.; and WHEREAS, the Miami Zoning Board, at its meeting of June 2, 1986, Item 3 following an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution ZB 58-86 by a 9 to 0 vote, granting a variance, with conditions, from Section 2023, Zoning Ordinance 9500, to provide 3 of 10 required off-street loading stalls 12' x 35' x 15' and 4 of 8 required off street loading stalls 12' x 55' x 15'; and WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of June 18, 1986, Item 1, following an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution PAB 20-86 by a 9 to 0 vote, recommending approval, with modifications, of the amended Development Order for the Miami Center I project; and WHEREAS, the City Commission, at its meeting of June 26, 1986, Item PZ-13 passed Motion 86-520 which continued the item to 3:30 pm, September 25, 1986, subject to the applicant's acceptance of ten minimum requirements as outlined by the Planning Department; failing which the applicant would not be required to appear; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has determined that all requirements of publication and other legal requirements for the issuance of the Development Order have been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the best interests of the general welfare of the City of Miami to approve an amended Development Order for the Miami Center I project, a Development of Regional Impact as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Section 1. The following findings of fact and conclusion of law are made with respect to the project: a. The City Commission hereby determines that One Dupont Plaza is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood ' Plan. b. The City Commission hereby determines that One Dupont Plaza is in accord with the zoning district classifications of Zoning Ordinance 9500. c. The City Coninission hereby finds that One Dupont Plaza would not have an adverse impact on soils, animal life, or vegetation and —5W �r 6 to 8 further finds that it would have a number of positive impacts including: 1. Up to 2,500 permanent new jobs would be generated by the One Dupont Plaza project, and, as a result, nearly 2,900 additional full-time jobs could be created in South Florida, with a $108 million increase in total wages and $184 million in value added to the regional economy. 2. A net positive fiscal impact of $8.1 million would be created by the One Dupont Plaza project. 3. A reduction in the growth of regional energy consumption would result from the energy efficient conservation measures proposed by the Applicant. d. The City Commission hereby finds that One Dupont Plaza would have a number of adverse impacts which result from the normal course of development or can be potentially mitigated by the applicant through the conditions in the Development Order, as follows: 1. Increase annual energy use within the Region by the equivalent of nearly 6.7 million gallons of fuel oil. 2. Increase the amount and number of hazardous wastes generated on -site. 3. Place additional unfunded demands upon police, emergency - rescue, and fire services. 5. Generate 2,464 AM and 2,250 PM peak -hour vehicle trips (Miami Center existing and One Dupont Plaza) on the regional roadway network and, along with other development traffic, reduce levels of service on segments of the regional roadway network. Section 2. A Development Order, amending Resolutions 79-396; May 24, 1979, as amended by Resolution 80-707; September 25, 1980; being the Development Order for the Ball Point Project, AKA Miami Center I Project, a Development of Regional Impact, proposed by Ethan Minsky, as agent for Miami Center Joint Venture ("Applicant"), for Tract D, DU PONT PLAZA (50-11) P.R.D.C. is hereby approved with conditions, and granted and issued in two parts: Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of this Resolution, described in Exhibit "D" attached hereto and made a part hereof), and Exhibit "B", attached hereto and made a part hereof, pertaining only to the southerly 3.01 acres of the site known as the "One Dupont Plaza" Projectl, Phases 1 and 2 and more particularly described in Exhibit "F", which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. Exhibit "B" shall be binding only upon Applicant, its assigns and/or successors, and shall constitute a covenant running with the land for the southern 3.01 acres that are part of the One Dupont Plaza project in accordance with Section 9 of this Resolution. Nothing set forth in Exhibit "B" shall be binding in any way upon the owners of Miami Center Existing, its successors and/or assigns, nor shall anything in Exhibit "B" increase, decrease or otherwise affect the obligations of Miami Center Existing under Exhibit "A". To the extent that there are any obligations, rights, duties, privileges or liabilities set forth in Exhibit "A" which are in conflict with, or which are substantially similar to, obligations, rights, duties, privileges or liabilities set forth in Exhibit "B", then, as to the southern 3.01 acres, Exhibit "B" shall control and supersede Exhibit "A"; provided, however, that nothing in Exhibit "B" shall be construed to in any way control or supersede the provisions of Exhibit "A" as the latter apply to the northern 5.45 acres. Section 3. The Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council dated February 4, 1986, is attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and made a part of this Development Order, provided however, that nothing set forth in said Exhibit "C", shall be binding in any way upon "Miami Center Existing" (the northern, developed portion of the Miami Center I project { consisting of the Hotel Intercontinental [F/K/A Pavillon Hotel], the Edward Ball office building and garage and associated uses described in Exhibit "E"), its successors and/or assigns. The Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council dated May 7, 1979, on file with the City Clerk as Exhibit "B" to Resolution 79-396; May 24, 1979, remains in effect only as not superseded by Section 2 herein or in conflict with the aforementioned Exhibit "C" or Exhibit "B" attached hereto. 1 The name of the proposed project on the southerly 3.01 acres of the original Miami Center 1 Project has been changed from Biscayne Plaza to One DuPont Plaza" because of a name conflict with an existing "Biscayne Plaza Shopping Center and Office Complex." Mr. Russell Wirth, proposed developer of the southern 3.01 acres described in Exhibit F, attached hereto, stipulated to the name change, on the record, during the Planning Advisory Board Meeting of June 18, 1986., Consequently, the proposed Exhibit B amendments to the Development Order of 1979, as amended in 1980, are for a project now known as "One Dupont Plaza", and will be identified as such where possible. Any references to "Biscayne Plaza" are to be construed as references to "One Dupont Plaza" and vice versa. -7- Section 4. The Consolidated Application for Development Approval (CADA) as revised pursuant to Condition 20 Exhibit "R" is incorporated herein by reference and is on file with the City Clerk and is relied upon by the parties in discharging their statutory duties under Chapter 380.05 F.S. and local ordinance provided, however that nothing set forth in the CADA shall be binding in any way upon the owner of "Miami Center Existing" (the northern, developed portion of the Miami Center I project consisting of the Hotel Intercontinental (F/K/A Pavilion Hotel), the Edward Ball office building and garage and associated uses), its successors and/or assigns. The Application for Development Approval, filed in 1979, as revised pursuant to Condition 16 of Exhibit "A" of Resolution 79-396, May 24, 1979, remains in effect only as not superseded by, or in conflict with, the aforementioned Consolidated Application for Development Approval. Substantial compliance with the representations contained in the Applications for Development Approval are a condition for approval unless waived or modified by agreement among the Council, City and Applicant, its successors and/or assigns, jointly and severally. Section S. Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" shall be binding upon the Applicant Miami Center Joint Venture and its successors in interest as provided herein. Exhibit "A" shall be binding upon the owner of Miami Center Existing and its successors and assigns. Section 6. The Development Order attached to this Resolution for Development of the One Dupont Plaza project shall expire on December 31, 19969 if prior to that date the applicant has not obtained a foundation building permit for One Dupont Plaza, Phase 2, or upon certification by the Planning Director to the City Commission that all conditions of the Development Order have been met, whichever is earliest, provided further that in any event the Development Order will terminate on January 1, 2000. Section 7. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to send certified copies of the Resolutions immediately to: The Florida Department of Community Affairs, 2571 Executive Center Circle East, Tallahassee, Florida 32301; The South Florida Regional Planning Council, 3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 140, Hollywood, Florida 33021; Ethan Minsky, Esq., Shea and Gould, 801 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1401, Miami, Florida 33131; and Jeffrey Bercow, Esq., Steel Hector b Davis, 4000 Southeast Financial Center, Miami Florida 33131- 2398. Section 8. The recitals of fact referred to in the "WHEREAS" clause are true and correct and made a part hereof. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record this Development Order, consisting of this Resolution and Exhibits "A", „8„ "C", "p", "E", and "F" and their attachments, with the Clerk, Dade County Circuit Court, pursuant to Section 380.06(16)(f), Florida Statutes (1985), specifying that this Development Order is a covenant running with the land that consists of the southerly 3.01 acres that is the site for the Biscayne Plaza project and more particularly described in Exhibit "F". This covenant shall be binding on Miami Center Joint Venture, its successors and/or assigns, jointly or severally. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th_ day of October 1986. VIER L. , '..- i Exhibit "A" Attached to and made a part of Resolution 86-828 October 7, 1986 10'0 s•• -5/17/79 79-396 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI COn-IISSION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF A DEVELOPMENT ORDER, - APPROVING WITH MODIFICATIONS. THE BALL POINT PROJECT, A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPAC'-. PROPOSED BY. HOLYWELL CORPORATION', FOR TRACT D. DUPONT PLAZA (50-11). LOCATED ON THE NORTH BANK A'ND AT THE 14OUTH OF THE MIA!'41 RIVER, AFTER CON DUCTING A PUBLIC HEARING AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 380.06, FLORIDA STATUTES, AND CONSIDERING THE REPORT AND REC0.MNDATIONS OF THE SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL AND THE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A"; THE RECO�'IIENDATIONS OF THE SOUTH FLORIDA FIGIONAL FLAN►1ING COUNCIL ATTACHED HERETO AS E734IBIT °'B"; Ar]D THE APPLICA- TION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE; FINDING THAT THE DE'rZ:.OPER'S PROPOSED CHANGES FRO:4 THAT APPROVED BY THE SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNNCIL INVOL:_" NO SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION; FURTHER DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO SEND THE RESOLUTION TO AFFECTED AGENCIES AND THE DEVELOPER. . WHEREAS, The Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting held on May 16, 1979, Item fl. following an advertised hearing. adopted Resolution No. PAB-23-79 by a 7 to 0 vote (1 member ebsert). reco®ending approval of the Development Order for the Ball point Project, a Development of Regional Impact. as hereinafter set forth; and FINDINGS OF FACT WHEREAS, Holywell Corporation has proposed the undertaking of the Ball Point Project, a Development of Regional Impact, as defined by Chapter 22F-2. Rules of the State of Florida Department of Administration, located within the City of Miami, on a tract of 8.46 acres, at the North bank and at the Mouth of the -Miami River, comprised of 805,400 square feet of gross office space; 630 hotel units in a structure containing 658,400 square feet of gross hotel space; 500 duelling units; 85,000 square feet of gross space for retail use; and 2.365 parking spaces; and co CUMMON MEND OF MY2 419i9Nam" _ *� wL...... y i WHEREAS. Holywell Corporation has submitted a complete Application for Development Approval for a Development of Regional Impact to the South Florida Regional.. Planning eouncil° pursuant to Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes, and did receive a favorable recommendation for a proposed development order on May 7•, 1979, -as set forth in the -Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, the Application for Development Approval, as.reviewed by the South Florida Regional P1'anning Council, referred to an office building with 928,200 square feet or gross office space; a hotel structure with 550,000 gross square feet, and a parking structure with 2,560 parking spaces, which does not amount to outstanding change fron what is now proposed; and WHEREAS, Holywell Corporation has complied with all the requirements set forth in Ordinance No. 8290; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has considered the Report and Reco=endations of the South Florida Regional Planning. Council and each element required to be considered by Chapter 360.06 Florida Statutes; and CONCLUSIONS OF LAW WHEREAS, the Ball Point Project, proposed by the Holywell Corporation complies with the Miami Comprehensive neighborhood Plan, is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of f Miami. and complies with local and development regulations, being Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 6871; and WHEREAS, the proposed development does not unreasonable inter - fare with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami and WHEREAS, the proposed development is consistent with the Report and Recommendations of the South•Florida Regional Planning Council and does not unreasonably interfere with any of the considerations and objectives set forth in Chapter 330. Florida Statutes;.and ,16 _ .. JAdEREAS, th.t.; �i;;- Zoning Board, on ';a, 2-, -­979, granted • variance from t►ie 300 foot height lin.*i c and a va granted Conditi.octal. Use approval for parking uses as Allowed in Ordinance Ro. 6871, thie Comprehensive Zoning Ordf nance for the City of Hiami; and WHEP.EAS, the City Commission has determined that all require- ments of publication and other legal requirements for the issuance of the proposed Development Order have been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Commission deeds it advisable and in the best interests of the general welfare of the City ®? Miami to 'issue a Development Order ¢or the Development of Regional Impact, as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED.BY THE CO!VISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. A Development Order, attached hereto as Exhibit "A", approving with modifications, the Ball Point Project, a Develop—ment of Regional Immpact, proposed by Hol;raell Corporation for Tract D, DL'?O'NT PLAZA (50-11) , located on the North bank and at the mouth of s the Miami River, be and the same is hereby granted and issued. t Section 2. The Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council dated May 7, 1979, is attached as Exhibit "B". and made a part of. this Develo=ent Order. Section 3. The Application for Development Approval is incorporated herein by reference and relied upon by the parties in discharging their statutory duties under Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes. Substantial compliance with the representations contained in the Application for Development Approval is a condition -for • approval unless waived or modified by agreement among the.parties. Section 4. Pursuant to Section 380.06 (2), Florida Statutes. the City of Miami has reviewed the proposed changes to the Applica- tion for Development Approval from that approved by the South Florida. Regional Planning Council, and finds no substantial deviation there- from. Section 5. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to send certified copies of this Resolution immediately to the Florida Division of State Plannina. Department of Administration, Room 530. Carlton Building, Tallahassee. Florida 32304; to the f th Florida Regional Planning Council. 1515 N.W. 167th Street, Sou Suite 429, Miami. Florida; and to Holywall Corporation, 2 DuPont Circle, Suite 100, Washington, D. C. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26 day of May 1979. s_ ATTEST: MAURICE A FEM 17. F E RZE ; •A �'' .• P. �••. .•1•�•�, I�wbR'r^!^+. .TM.S.iw _ �•'MRAll1i..M' •^T• lxgNsTrag .b - a. � ... � w a � .. _ < ••e•�nA•fa•kNwe11 T+en'^�TM•r+••'•••. l �. ..'t ... .. .. ... w. .. . e.•.•w •ras,gw�': a. e.�,.wv.u...•sn+:_a«r.e.�.....�-a .. ... •• -_ vas:•.. «..a . ,. •le4 •. Y. • In. ' ' .•. ... .••'•. •K•• , •• •.w'i'i:,•••w�'.i �.••. .:vela •Pw • -.w• a r. •, ! _ ••�. .'..�•••�: .A-.6 w, �u««a.®.••r�a•® ,a•vs •••as. •w.��.:«.w .♦ ..•-... ••. •• swam !•®s.w•iw• .. .••..«•�TIlT' ..... w•.•►+s,ewlMOi^--.••LON+..�y.}'..••.••1•�►•: •..11'1�•Y,•..,•.��•••.7.,q•�1.ews•r.T.�a'spp• ... .ee*m:: .w::. .. •. .. • . .. . L • .. ... .. •. .. • ^' • •isi,��,•' �V►'•i.• .• v.A•w1.•.�,l.W'1. e.'�..� �.�AAr.T•Me.T'•• r f EMBIT A V VZVZ APME" ORDER Let it be known that pursuant to Chapter 380.0 Florida Statutes the Com®ission of the City of Miami Florida has considered in public hearing held on May 24, 1979' the issuance of Development Order for Hall point, a Development of Regional Impact to be located in the City of Miami. Pursuant to Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes and after due consideration of the consistency of this proposed development with regulations, and the Report and �. Reco=*ndations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council, the Commission r; w took the following action: Approval of this development with the �following, E- modifications. Development 1. The development is limited to a project containing not more than: 805,400 -�-, square feet of gross office spaces 630 hotel units in a structure con- taininq 658,400 square feet of gross hotel spaces 500 dwelling units: • 05,000 square feet of gross retail use and 2,36S parking spaces. Thi project as proposed mould comprise an average Floax Area Ratio of 6.36 for the 8.46 acre site, approval having been previously granted for a variance frm the 300-foot height limit and conditional use approval for 1, #. parking uses. Further, the lot coverage is ts•the ground usable open space is �1,7�the enclosed pedestrian open space at main floor level is 16 as specified by the Applicant in the Application for ;j Development approval and the preliatnaty design documents of March 23, 1979. as amended by Supplement dated Malt 11 . 1979. ' rA.,°.`AAS"..Fls. 4h - _ _ _ ''°,%-z' +•�y� P '•}'r!+t. !ye ..+ - -Rpm 1 •\!!^'•. • as •. •\\. •\•Mi\\wY }•\ewe... M••w C4�A •A•; •.• ��•�.•• . 2. r/ The applicant is encouraged to address the following conosrns about the proposed development: a. Activities should be incorporated along the River Walk in order to provide meaningful and continuous pedestrian experiences and attractions. b. Attention should be given to the treatment of the Biscayne Boulevard facade to ameliorate the apparent bulk of the structure. C. Attention should be given within the project to providing views of the Miami River and Biscayne Say as, for example, by interior design of the main floor level. d. Attention should be given to shade and landscaping at the podium level. These concerns, as shown in construction documents, are subject to Planning Department approval prior to the issuance of a building permit for parking and any enclosed areas.- Permits for such matters as foundations, seawall renovation and site preparation will be issued, however, upon proper applications therefore. before such approval is required. 1. The applicant will dedicate a pedestrian easement of not less than 29 feet to the City of Miami in perpetuity for Miami River Walk and Sayfront Walk purposes. and will construct the Walk and provide furniture and iandscapizq deesred necessary by the City of Miami. The applicant will design this eaee- neert. area and adjacent private space to alloet views and access frost the project establishments. while fostering appropriate public use of this walk*44Y Responsibility for perpetual maintenance of all sections of the Walk b'Y tho Applicant will be specified in the easement do t. rinal la soak. pia+�s are subject to the approval of the planning and Public ~forks Deets irw to the issuance of a pirrmit for the Miarei River italic and Bayfront . r ...•.«tw•..v.... f... ... .. ..w�r....�..•.....�.w.wt...;T.-r..r..w�,.r�w...�.+..•....•�.gw•.. . ' • f�l1�...�.. ..=�•�.�j.•.••'�.•�:i� Y/!iM .w irsrri3Y.le ��/�.�l+.w �111a. • ..... •i, r ��• . • ..a•!.e•e•► . y. ii►•':..s •�., 7.'�'.R��.��'•n7�OMe.rlw.lAI.IM�•ii�'�/dM�A••��'oiALN.�giw•• �1r.. M• . , Pernits for such nutters as foundations, seawall renovation and site prepasat. will be issued. however, upon proper applications therefor before. such approval is required. 4. The Applicant shall provide landscape treatment for the easterly and of -fi Chopin Plaza as a means of connecting the Bayfront Walk with Sayfront .Y Park, at least cm*arable to the dimensions of the Bayfront Walk,with ` 5 maintenance by the Applicant. Final landscape plans are subject to the approval of the Planning Department and Parks Department. n 7 S. Subject to.obtaining all necessary permits and approvals, in the event that a Downtown People mover station is located at, or in the vicinity of. F Biscayne Boulevard between SE 2nd and 3rd Avenues, then the Applicant shall'`E ,. provide an upper level pedestrian connection to the station. 6. Za the event that the developer is successful in acquiring ownership of at least three of the four blocks in adjacent Dupont Plaza, ttsn the Applicant' shall consider the provision of an upper level pedestrian connectioR from ' this project to the Applicant's future development in Dupont Plaza. Traffic Access and Parking 7. Prior to the issuance of a building permit. for parking apd enclosed areas. F: Wemits for such matters is foundation,. seawall renovation and site prep&ra will be issued, however, upon proper applications therefor, before such appta, is rsquirsd), the Applicant .sball, using assumptions- at�d at3.oss rages att a?ple to the Dade county Department of Traffic and Transportation t"CountY. South Florida regional Planning Council ("Council"), prepare and subuit OffrO priate data and docuse¢ntation affimatively demonstrating to the satisfatti,r of the City of Miami Public Works and Planning Dep is t`Ci "�NA that County acceptable interim Loprovwonts 0 allow roadways to operate at la d= of service acceptable to the City and the County in the 3..W. a � • NMI, 1 •• . �•M•. i•••i••��\••e w.•r1•••Es.wl. ./'•ve.i=•I...IA s�•••r•M• ••.M �. .• •'• • .•�i•Y ,ww.i� •• • . .. w •. . •�+.•r: • ••...�_ __-•.1P'•1 �I•��!•rY'nWi �•+Y...r�1N •:•....�•�.e .. � ... .. ... .. .i •. ... . '. .,. ..'A• ,1 .. ,•tip..•. •r•'�, ,.�• '• .�. .• .. .. data and documentation shall also'include projections acceptable to the City, the Council and the County establishing when implamen- tation of interim solutions shall be required in whole or in part. Such projections shall be reviewed annually after beginning of occupancy and, when appropriate, modified by the City, the Council and the County. The Applicant shall pay its equitable share of the cost of implementinq the acceptable interim improvements. Prior to the issuance of a buildinq permit for parkinq and enclosed areas (permits for such matters as foundation, seawall renovation and site preparation will be issued, however. upon proper applications AY•`_ therefor before such approval is required). the Applicant shall "s{= estimate in a manner acceptable to the City or • r _ r f .. ., - _ ice) J•'� 71 { r'r IF V49 -�MJoe i? � • � . � yr: �.�• TFll�a. bMu r p _• _ 1•••ti'a••. ••. �w'Yw•r••y•••\��.M «.ar._....• - -.• «p.tt�w•r,�-.IVO�J•�!b��� � ... +r1�T' �i � 1 ,.•iy • L' r!9. �a.'!1•"-'_'11��tT!.•�1• , I' Y `� .. ��� •. j•.. • ••,••r•.r—w.•q•....twM••;.�./n...•��I.Pr.•'r ..n L••i•i.rwY....r _ ` ..em.l..wm ® , .®.w..+.wirr�•rawY w.. i •� .� • �. ..•• �•7w�.T.1f�M��. M••�pf 1•.��•a�wA Attwr..wyes•�•n�.wsf7••wss e•.r•`:•t•/Nt.r1{/•:•�. _ ............. .. r the County, such equitable share and bond that amount Vith the City or the County. Prior to the issuance of a building pesmsit.for parking and enclosed areas (permits = for such matters as foundations, seawall renovation and site preparation will be issued, however, upon proper applications, therefor before such approval is required), the Applicant shall obtain a -commitment on the part of the City and the County to implement the acceptable interim improvements by the time indicated by the projections.',, Copies of documents, data and commitments chall be sent to the Council and incorporated.` into the Application for Development Approval. 8. The Applicant will fund the following improvements to Biscayne Boulevard along the site which are necessary to accommodate Ball Point traffic: provision of four , traffic lanes on Biscayne Boulevard from the southernmost site access point to SE 2nd Street and will dedicate any property necessary for such improvements: removal of the island near SE 3rd Street, provision of a traffic signal at SE 3rd Street, and adds- tion of a second left turn lane northbound onto SE 2nd Street. If approved interim Improvements, under 7 above, obviate the need for any of these improvements, such r« improvements{a) shall not be required. .9. The Applicant will reserve the land located west and south of the eastern right-of-way of Biscayne Boulevard extended, and will dedicate that land to the appropriate govern- ment agency if the land is required for construction of a Miami River crossing or, in the event that such construction does not proceed, will dedicate that land to the City of Miami for a public purpose. 10. The Applicant will,negotiate as agreement with the City of Miami, providing for two traffic lanes on Chopin Plaza unobstructed by parking movements for adequate access to the hotel, with the balance of right-of-way on Chopin Plaza devoted to parking. ` t Miami. River Bayfront Walk purposes and other approved uses. The applicant shall indemnify the Off -Street Parking Authority for any loss of metered parking spaces'' attributable to providing adequate access to the hotel. -S-' %•+ i ^'ma`s w «• . - - • A w• .aw�.r.. .s•.:i.:•.s•..•• .. •s � ::� ' ••elw.ga ' .• •.r....a..iw..:..w' .cove .a. .•i.w.ri.•. w•.:. �:��•'..«i:L ws.w •i ,. :. . •• .... n•wrs s+. ,. .M. w.s•••s,.r.,(•�....K.M •w►.p ..3tiwM'A.•a.rwNaw'n .y w®w:,.. .. ' i� • 11. The Applicant will provide at least the equivalent of the spaces that would be required by the Dade County Zoning Code (Section 33-124(a)) for ,i exclusive use by condominium residents and quests. The Applicant may provide such parking supply through construction of additional self -parking facilities: through facility redesign; through design for and provisions of7 val'at parking, or a combination of the above methods. i Environmental 12. The Applicant will report to the South Florida Regional Planning Council thee'; results of its marine comunity survey before proceeding on seawall renovation:'. Zf viable marine communities are detected, the Applicant will incorporate, In its Corps of Engineers permit application,, measures to minimise impact of seawall renovation on these organisms. 13. The Applicant will inform the Dade County Historic Survey of the inception and timing of excavation for the project. 14. The Applicant shall secure a complex source permit prior to the inccption of constructiot. 15. This Development Order shall be null and void if substantial development of the site has not befun within two years of the recorded date of the Developm ' Order. 16. The Applicant will incorporate all additional information requested by this Development order and revisions submitted by the Applicant subsequent to original submission of the Applicatton for Development Approval into a coa- plot* document and will provide copies in a timely vWwMV to the South Tloridt Regional flanninq Council. City of Hismi, [wade County and the State. -6- '. � *+ , , <r "'..eA°�9 "^'w•, K".h' � �r ... . .. a •n,^MM1- w • .�=,'°k�,�ya+.�.:i,.�.�...«w w "�'.»r . a s:.. 17, The Application for Developteet.t Approval is incorporated herein by reference and relied upon by the parties in discharginq their statutory duties under Chapter 380 rlorida Statutes. Substantial compliance with the representations contained in the Application for Development Approval is a condition for approval unless waived or modified by agreement among the parties. P. y. i RESOLUTION NO. 8 0• 7 0 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI COMMISSION AMENDING PARAGRAPH 7, EXHIBIT "A", RESOLUTION 79-396; MAY 24,1979, BEING A DEVELOPMENT ORDER, APPROVING WITH MODIFICATIONS, THE BALL POINT NIAMI CENTER) PROJECT: WIHICH AMENDMENT REQUIRES AGREEMENT ON INTERIM TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY RATHER THAN PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT; FINDING THAT THIS AMENDMENT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION FROM THE TERMS OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER, AND FURTHER DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO SEND THIS RESOLUTION TO AFFECTED AGENCIES AND THE DEVELOPER. WHEREAS, the City of Miami Commission by Resolution 79-396, dated May 24, 1979 issued a Development Order, approv- ing with modifications, the Sall Point project, a Development of Regional Impact to be located on Tract D, DuPont Plaza (50-11), and WHEREAS, paragraph 7, Exhibit "A", of the Development Order requires the developer, Holywell Corporation, to submit documentation concerning the design and schedule for the imple- mentation of interim traffic improvements acceptable to the City of Miami prior to the issuance of a building permit, and WHEREAS, the projected construction schedules for the Sall Point project, now known as Miami Center, and the adjacent four block DuPont Plaza area pose severe time and operating constraints in the interim period, and "cocuMEW INocxSTEM NO WHEREAS, a DuPont Plaza Task Force representing a ad private and public agencies, was appointed September 8, 1980 by the Transportation Planning Council of the Metropolitan Planning Organization to expeditiously recommend a schedule of implementa- tion for interim and final traffic improvements to Public agencies and private entities, and, WHEREAS, the Commission finds thgt it is in the public interest to continue toiassure overall public and'private coordination and participation in interim and final traffic ,solutions in the DuPont Plaza area by providing that Holywell Corporation reach agreement on interim traffic improvements prior to the issuance of a certi-ficate of occupancy rather than a building permit,; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CONHISSION OF TOE CITY OF MIAMI , FLORIDA: Section 1. Paragraph 7, Exhibit "A", Resolution 79-396; May 24, 1979, being a Development Order, approving with modifications, the Ball Point (Miami Center) project is hereby amended in the following particulars:l/ " Traffic Access and Parking 7. Prior to the issuance of a ba#4dng-�oee�t certificate of occupancy, for parking and enclosed areas, (permits for such matters as foundation, seawall renovation and site prep- aration will be issued; however, upon proper, applications therefor, before such approval is required), the Applicant shall, using assumptions, and generation rates acceptable to the Dade County Department of Traffic and Transportation ("County") and to South -Florida Regional Planning Council ("Council"), prepare I/Words and/or figures stricken shall be deleted. Underscored words and/or figures constitute the amendment proposed. The remaining provisions are now in effect and remain unchanged. u a and submit appropriate data and documentation affirmatively demonstrating to the satisfac- tion of the City of Miami Public Works and Planning Departments ("City") and the County acceptable interim im provements mprovements to allow road- ways to gperate at levels of service acceptable to the City and the County in the A.M. and P.M. peak hours pending the completion of final traffic improvements. The data and documenta- tion shall also include projections acceptable t. -; to the City, the Council and the County establish- ing when implementation of interim solutions shall be required in whole or in part. Such projections : shall be reviewed annually after beginning of occupancy and, when appropriate, modified by the f` City, the Council and the County. The Applicant 3- ' shall pay its equitable share of the cost of imple' ' menting the acceptable interim improvements. Prior to the issuance of a but4d4a g-peem#* certificate of occupancy for parking and enclosed areas (permits for such matters as foundation, seawall renovation i, and site preparation will.be issued, however, upon proper applications therefor before such approval f4! .. �V..11 .�1.�•an �w •f manner acceptable to the City or the Coun.;y, such equitable share and bond that amount with the City or the County. Prior to -the issuance of a bv44d4eg. permit certificate of occupancy forparking and on - closed areas (permits for such chatters as foundations, seawall renovation and site preparation will be issued, however, upon proper applications, therefor before such approval is required), the Applicant shall obtain a commitment on the part of the City and the County to implement the acceptable interim improvements by the time "SU �^0'''TIVE _- � � =•��� indicated by the projections. Copies of docu- Dt.%`i:J;Y:..1 ments, data and commitments shall be sent to FOLLOWthe Council and incorporated into the Applica- tion for Development Approval." Section 2. The City of Miami Commission finds that this amendment to paragraph 7(above) does not constitute a sub- stantial deviation from the terms of the Development Order approved by the City of Miami Commission by Resolution 79-396 dated May 24, 1979. Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to immediately send certified copies of this Resolution to the Florida Department of Community Affairs, Division of Local Resource Management, 2571 Executive Center Circle East, Tallahassee, Florida 32301; to the South Florida Regional Planning Council, 1515 NW 167th Street, Suite 429, Miami, Florida, and to the Holywell Corporation, 11 DuPont Circle, Suite 100, Washington, D. C. 20036. ... �-- .\� .�P-sue•\ ww•=� r- i^. �C �--�.,�... •��. UR+yE A. C GW A. , MMR r. . ISTANT CITY ATTORNEY EXHIBIT "B" Attached to, and made a part of Resolution 86-828; October 7, 1986 DEVELOPMENT ORDER (AS AMENDED OCTOBER 7, 1986) Let it be known that pursuant to Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes the Commission of the City of Miami Florida has considered in public hearing held on May 24, 1979 the issuance of Development Order for Ball Point, a Development of Regional Impact to be located in the City of Miami, and has considered in public hearing held on October 7, 1986, the issuance of an amended Development Order for the Miami Center I project (A/K/A Ball Point Project) a Development of Regional Impact, located in the City of Miami. Pursuant to Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes and after due consideration of the consistency of this proposed development with pertinent regulations, and the Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council dated February 4, 1986, the Commission took the following action: Approval of this development, as amended, with the following modifications concerning and limited to that portion of the development located on the southern (3.01 acres) portion of Tract D, Block 1, DUPONT PLAZA (50-11) hereinafter referred to as "One DuPont Plaza" (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) (Exhibit "F"): Development 1. Condition 1, as it applies solely to the southern portion known as One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza), Exhibit A, Resolution 79-396; May 240 1979 is hereby amended in the following respects: "One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) is limited to a project containing not more than (See Figures 1, 2 and 3 attached in the appendix): Phase 1 Component Units/Spaces Area (Gross Square Feet) Office Tower 7000000 (722' NGVD + 65' Antenna) Commercial 160,000 Residential 60 units 120,000 (in office tower) Parking 1,200 spaces - Sub -Total 9800000 Note: All language in Exhibit "B" following Condition 1 is new language; constituting a major amendment to the Development Order. While underlining has not been used; all language in Exhibit "B" should be interpreted as if it were underlined. Page 1 of 19 L� Phase 2 Office Tower (884' NGVD + 65' Antenna) Commercial Residential 90 units in office tower) Sub -Total Total (excluding parking)* *Note: Parking is equivalent to 600,000 square feet 7800000 60,000 l80,000 1-,�;m 2 2000 , 000 The project is subject to schematic design drawings (Sheets 1-13) dated January 21, 1986, as amended by drawings dated May 2, 1986 submitted by Schleicher -Soper, Architects, wherein 6 floors of residential are shown on the Phase I tower and 9 floors of residential are shown in the Phase 2 tower. Office uses may be substituted for these residential uses, at the option of the Applicant, without such action being considered a substantial deviation, subject to the approval of the Miami City Commission. Each Office Tower may include at the option of the Applicant a health club (1 floor); a restaurant (1 floor); an executive club (1 floor); a restaurant and cabaret on the top of the podium (on the roof or llth floor), and -a tower observation center/skytop cafe, provided that these certain uses are included in the computation of "Commercial" above. The rink and roof garden on the podium level are considered open space. The project has been recommended for approval, in principle, by the Urban Development Review Board, on January 28, 1986, with the recommendation that at the time of issuance of Class C Permit, the project shall again be reviewed by the Urban Development Review Board. The project has been exempted from the requirements of the Metro Dade County Shoreline Development Review Ordinance (Metro Dade County Ordinance 85-14) by letter of January 17, 1986. The Atlanta Office, Federal Aviation Administration has no objection, if the height of the building plus antenna is 899' MSL per letter of February 7, 1986; the Dade County Aviation Department has no objection if the height.of the building plus antenna is 949' MSL. Therefore, no permit will be issued for Page 2 of 19 buildings and antennae on the site whose height would exceed 899' MSL unless the Atlanta office of the Federal Aviation Agency state., in writing that they have no objection to a height of 949' MSL, in which instance the height of buildings and antennae on the site are limited to 949' MSL. On June 2, 1986, the Miami Zoning Board granted a variance from the off-street truck loading bay requirements of Section 2023, Zoning Ordinance 9500. The Applicant will supply 3 of 10 required bays 12' x 35' x 15' in size and 4 of 8 required bays 12' x 55' x 15' in size (of which three (3) are to be built in Phase I and one is to be built in Phase 2.). The Applicant proposes to lease 600 parking spaces should a parking structure be built on an adjacent vacant block in the DuPont Plaza. A grant of special exception for off-street parking per CBD-1 zoning district, of Zoning Ordinance 9500 from the Miami Zoning Board and a Class C Permit may be necessary, should such a parking structure be proposed for construction. Simulataneous with submitting any applications for building permits for One DuPont Plaza, the Applicant shall furnish to the adjoining property owners of Miami Center Existing and Southeast Financial Center the following: (a) notice of its application for a building permit; (b) a copy of such application; (c) a set of the structural plans for the proposed building; and (d) a copy of the foundation engineering calculations and reports for such proposed building. The Applicant will cooperate with such adjoining property owners in order to maintain the structural integrity and foundation support of their improvements." THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY SHALL: Environment 2. Remove all invasive exotic plants from the project site as the site is E.: cleared, and use only those plant species specified in Attachment 1 in` future project landscaping. 3. Have a professional archaeologist on -site during all earthwork, notify State and County archaeologists of construction schedules, delay construction up to three months in any area where potentially significant historic or archaeological artifacts are uncovered, and for a reasonable time and in a manner calculated to minimize any interference with y construction, permit State and local historic preservation officials'to survey and excavate the site. Page 3 of 19 �r 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for Phase 1, provide funds on deposit or a performance bond in the amount of $500,000, and construct, using the Applicants' funds, and complete prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 1, the Riverwalk and provide furniture, lighting and landscaping pursuant to City of Miami Riverwalk and Baywalk Guides and Standards (the Guidelines) in effect at the time of adoption of this Development Order. The Applicant will design the Riverwalk and adjacent private space to allow views and access from private establishments, while fostering appropriate public use of the Riverwalk. Final landscape plans for the Riverwalk are subject to the approval of the Planning Department, in consultation with the Fire Department, prior to the issuance of a building permit. The Applicant shall incorporate, in Phase l of One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza), a minimum of 20,000 gross square feet of sidewalk cafes, restaurants and other retail uses in the area immediately adjacent to the Riverwalk (area already included in area computations of Condition 1). At the onset of Phase II, the City will reinstitute the requirement of a performance bond in the amount of $500,000 to guarantee that the Riverwalk, if damaged by construction, will be repaired. (The Riverwalk easement and perpetual maintenance agreement have been previously required in Condition 3, Exhibit "A" of the original Development Order dated May 24, 1979 (attached). 5. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 1, provide funds or a performance bond in the amount of $500,000 and construct, using the Applicants funds, and complete prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 1, a landmark focal point including, for example, a water feature, significant artwork, landscaping, lighting and furniture adjacent to the entrance to the project fronting S. Biscayne Boulevard (extended) subject to the approval of the Planning Department in an amount approximately but not less than $500,000, it being understood that said landmark focal point is of direct benefit to the project in ameliorating the bulk of the project and providing pedestrian amenities,. The Applicant is to provide perpetual maintenance. (Dedication is required pursuant to Condition 90 Exhibit "A" of the original Development Order dated May 24, 1919 (attached). Page 4 of 19 j,�° 028 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for Phase 1, provide funds on deposit or a performance bond in the amount of $500,000, and construct, using the Applicants' funds, and complete prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 1, the Riverwalk and provide furniture, lighting and landscaping pursuant to City of Miami Riverwalk and Baywalk Guides and Standards (the Guidelines) in effect at the time of adoption of this Development Order. The Applicant will design the Riverwalk and adjacent private space to allow views and access from private establishments, while fostering appropriate public use of the Riverwalk. Final landscape plans for the Riverwalk are subject to the approval of the Planning Department, in consultation with the Fire Department, prior to the issuance of a building permit. The Applicant shall incorporate, in Phase 1 of One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza), a minimum of 20,000 gross square feet of sidewalk cafes, restaurants and other retail uses in the area immediately adjacent to the Riverwalk (area already included in area computations of Condition 1). At the onset of Phase II, the City will reinstitute the requirement of a performance bond in the amount of $500,000 to guarantee that the Riverwalk, if damaged by construction, will be repaired. (The Riverwalk easement and perpetual maintenance agreement have been previously required in Condition 3, Exhibit "A" of the original Development Order dated May 249 1979 (attached). 5. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 1, provide funds or a performance bond in the amount of $500,000 and construct, using the Applicants funds, and complete prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 1, a landmark focal point including, for example, a water feature, significant artwork, landscaping, lighting and furniture adjacent to the entrance to the project fronting S. Biscayne Boulevard (extended) subject to the approval of the Planning Department in an amount approximately but not less than $500,000, it being understood that said landmark focal point is of direct benefit to the project in ameliorating the bulk of the project and providing pedestrian amenities. The Applicant is to provide perpetual maintenance. (Dedication is required pursuant to Condition 9, Exhibit "A" of the original Development Order dated May 240 1979 (attached). Page 4 of 19 ---------------- r.t 6. Contribute $1 million to the City toward the improvement of Bayfront Park prior to the issuance of a building permit for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 1; it being understood that said park improvement is of direct benefit to the project in ameliorating the apparent bulk of the project and to provide pedestrian and open space amenities for the occupants of the project as well as the public (see Attachment 2). 7. Design, construct, and maintain the stormwater management system to meet the following standards: During the construction of One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza), place rip -rap, temporary berms or other barriers to prevent discharge of construction -related runoff to the Bay. Construct permanent berms or barriers, at least one foot above grade, along the eastern and southern perimeter of the site. Retain the runoff from a 25-year storm on -site, and construct the project drainage system in accordance with all representations in the amended Application for Development Approval. I Route any and all parking area washdown water through oil and grease interceptors to a sanitary sewerl i ne or prohibit any and all washdown of project parking garages. Simultaneously with submitting any applications for drainage and water and sewer approvals for One DuPont Plaza, the Applicant shall furnish to the adjoining property owners of Miami Center Existing and Southeast Finacial Center the following: (a) notice of such application; (b) a copy of the DERM drainage permit application and drainage plans and calculations; and (c) a copy of the water and sewer permit applications and engineering plans. The Applicant will cooperate with such adjoining property owners in order to maintain the integrity of the drainage, water and sewer systems serving their properties. 8. Incorporate into the development, by restrictive covenant and lease or sales agreements, hazardous materials accident prevention, mitigation, and response standards. At a minimum, these standards shall: Require that areas within buildings where hazardous materials or hazardous wastes are to be used, generated, or stored shall be constructed with impervious floors, without drains, to ensure containment and facilitate cleanup of any spill or leakage. Page 5 of 19 Require that the loading/unloading of any hazardous material or hazardous waste shall occur in a covered loading/unloading dock with a spill containment area not connected to the project drainage or sewer system. • Prohibit any outside storage of hazardous materials or hazardous waste. . Require all hazardous waste generators to contract with a licensed public or private hazardous waste disposal service or processing facility and to provide to the Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) copies of one of the following forms of documentation of proper hazardous waste management practices: - a hazardous waste manifest; - proof of shipment to a permitted hazardous waste management facility; or - a confirmation of receipt of materials from a recycle or a waste exchange operation. Notify any tenant generating wastes of the penalties for improper disposal of hazardous waste pursuant to Section 403.727, Florida Statutes. Allow reasonable access to records and facilities for monitoring by the City, the Dade County DERM, and the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation to assure compliance with this Development Order, and all applicable laws and regulations. For the purposes of this Development Order a hazardous waste generator shall be defined as the Applicant and any tenant of the Applicant that falls under a SIC code listed in Attachment 3 attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and that uses, stores, or generates hazardous wastes. Hazardous wastes are defined as ignitable, corrosive, toxic, or reactive wastes, including those identified in Attachment 4; provided, however, that the uses in Attachment 3 and the wastes in Attachment 4 shall be simultaneously amended upon the addition or deletion of any or all of the listed uses, materials, or wastes by amendment to the "County and Regional Waste Assessment Guidelines" incorporated by reference into Rule 17-31.03(21), Florida Administrative Code. Safety and Security 9. Prior to issuance of a building permit for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase I, enter into an agreement with the City to contribute a fair share for capital facilities required to provide adequate fire service to the project if required by the City, or, in the page 6 of 19 ►°�"i;: ``` 3 limb ANIL alternative, pay a fair share contribution pursuant to an adopted City impact fee ordinance pertaining to fire service, if such impact fee ordinance is adopted by the City prior to obtaining certificate of occupancy for more than 980,000 gross square feet of development or, in the alternative, if such impact fee is adopted by the City within the next 5 years whichever is earlier (excluding development on Miami Center existing). 10. Collaborate with the City of Miami Fire Department to ensure that appropriate fire safety measures are incorporated into the project design and construction, through the approval of construction documents by the Fire Marshal. 11. Collaborate with the City of Miami Police Department to incorporate adequate security measures and systems into the design and operation of the project. The Applicant will submit the preliminary drawings prepared by Schleicher -Soper, Architects, dated January 21, 1986 as amended by drawings dated May 2, 1986, to the Police Department within 180 days of the effective date of this Development Order. The Police Department may request more detailed construction documents and, at their option, may prepare a safety and security report. The Applicant shall respond to the Planning Department, in writing, how and to what extent the recommendations of the Police Department have been incorporated into.the design construction and operation of the project, prior to the issuance of any building permit. 12. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 1, enter into an agreement with the, Police Department to contribute a fair share of police capital facilities needed to resolve City concerns, as determined by the City, or, in the alternative, pay a fair share contribution pursuant to an adopted City impact fee ordinance pertaining to police facilities, if such impact fee ordinance is adopted by the City prior to obtaining certificates of occupancy for more than 980,000 gross square feet of development (excluding development on Miami Center existing) or, in the alternative, if such impact fee is adopted by the City within the next 5 years, whichever is earlier. 13. Provide interior and roof space on either or both of the towers as necessary but not to exceed 150 square feet of area plus electrical; Page 7 of 19 service to the antenna site at no charge to the City, during and as part of the initial construction of One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza), if required by the City, for a communications antenna, supporting structure and equipment for the City's emergency communication system. Said antenna and appurtenances shall be at City of Miami expense. The Applicant shall retain the right of architectural, structural and engineering approval and said antenna shall not exceed the FAA approved height. Energy Conservation 14. Incorporate the following energy conservation measures into the development: a. Maximum flexibility of air conditioning systems to cool only occupied areas (on a floor -by -floor basis at minimum). b. Air distribution using variable air volume systems, if feasible. c. Minimum air conditioning energy efficiencies (EER) of 10.0 in buildings less than or equal to 250,000 square feet, and 12.0 in buildings over 250,000 square feet. d. Heat producing areas and equipment (cooking, water heating, etc.) isolated from air conditioned areas. e. Computerized elevator control system in all structures over 10 stories. f. Natural gas or other non -electric energy sources for cooking and water heating in restaurants, where feasible. g. Solar water heaters or waste heat recovery units to preheat cooking and washing hot water in restaurants, etc., where feasible. h. Hot water temperatures set at or below 1050F where allowed by health codes and equipment requirements. i. Lavatory water flow of 0.8 gallons per minute or less than water closets that use no more than three and one-half gallons per flush. J. Tinted glass to reduce the amount of direct sunlight entering air conditioned areas. k. Light -reflecting and/or light colored wall and roof surfaces, with solar absorption coefficients less than or equal to 0.50. 1. Electrical metering on a floor -by -floor basis. m. Computerized energy management system capable of start/stop optimization, demand lighting, lighting control, and zonal control. A statement showing the extent of design compliance with these criteria from the engineer(s) responsible for the design of the mechanical, Page 8 of 19 ,": . plumbing and electrical systems shall be filed prior to the issuance of a building permit for each phase of One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza). Traffic Access and Circulation 15. Incorporate the following into the project design and operation to minimize the cumulative impact of project traffic, and its associated pollutant emissions, on air quality: . Designate three percent of on -site employee parking spaces, located as close as possible to elevator and building entrances, for exclusive carpool or vanpool use. Actively encourage and promote car and van pooling by establishing a car pool information program. . Provide Metrorail, Metrobus, and Metromover route and schedule information in convenient locations throughout the project. 16. In the event that the Applicant leases parking spaces in a parking garage to be constructed in any of the three vacant blocks in DuPont Plaza, and a parking garage or other building is constructed on the opposite side of Biscayne Boulevard from the project, then subject to a grant of special exception by the Miami Zoning Board for the parking garage, the Applicant shall fund, design and construct an upper level pedestrian connection across S. Biscayne Boulevard, between the One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) project and said parking garage or other building located on the opposite side of Biscayne Boulevard, subject to the recommendation of the City of Miami Department of Public Works and subject to the issuance of a special permit by the Miami City Commission specifying physical clearances and amounts of public liability insurance to be provided by the Applicant. The Applicant is responsible for filing a covenant to this effect to be recorded effective with the effective date of this Development Order. [See also Condition 6, Exhibit "A" of the original Development Order, as amended (attached)]. 17a. Replat the southern 3.01 acres of Tract D, Block 1, DuPont Plaza (50-11) prior to obtaining building permits for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 1, subject to the normal requirements for subdivision improvements. The Applicant will dedicate all necessary easements and rights -of -way which are located on the southern portion of Tract D, Block 1, DuPont Plaza (i.e., the One Dupont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Page 9 of 19 property) which are for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) and which are required by the City, County, or State in order to construct required transportation improvements made necessary by One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza), including the second -level pedestrian system referred to in Condition 16 above, if constructed. 17.b. Within 180 days of the date of issuance of the Development Order, the Applicant is to present an traffic analysis demonstrating that the FDOT- approved Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System (Figure 4) will accommodate the projected traffic for Biscayne Plaza, both Phase 1 and 2, said traffic analysis subject to the approval of FOOT in writing. (Note: This requirement has been satisfied because of the letter from the Florida Department of Transportation dated June 24, 1986.) 17c. Prior to obtaining any building permits for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza), in the event that construction of the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System has not begun, fund or construct 100 percent of the interim roadway improvements identified as A(1), A(2), A(3) and A(4) in Attachment 5 (or suitable replacements mutually agreed upon by the City's Department of Public Works, Applicant, Dade County Department of Public Works, FDOT, and SFRPC staff), to the City, pursuant to s. 380.060 5)(e)2, Florida Statutes. 17d. In the event that the current Florida Department of Transportation approved design for the I-95 Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System (Figure 4) is superseded by the proposed Downtown Development Authority Alternative (Figure 5), fund a fair share of the incremental costs or receive a credit for any incremental savings (See Condition 17g) (See Attachment 7). If any other viable alternative to the I-95 Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System is accepted, as deemed by the Miami City Commission, the Applicant will fund a fair share of the costs, but B. Plus the following additional Items: 1) Conversion of Ramp Embankment 2) Service Road 3) Geometric Modifications of SE 2nd Avenue/ Biscayne Boulevard Way Intersection $ 80,000 $ 809000 $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 3T38;U00'-+ $138'9COU—+ ( but not less than the FOOT bid award) In this event, (i . e. Applicant's three proposed modifications in Figure 6 are constructed) funds shall be made available in a timely manner, prior to the FOOT bid award for the selected Bifurcated Ramp System; prior to issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase I, or by January 1, 1990, whichever is earliest pursuant to s. 380.06(15)(e)2 Florida Statutes. 17e. Prior to obtaining either a Certificate of Occupancy of any kind for Phase I or a building permit for Phase 2, fund a fair share of local surface street improvements identified in the current FOOT approved design for the I-95 Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System (Figure 4) or a) in the proposed DDA Alternative (Figure 5) or b) the Applicant's proposed modifications (Figure 6) as and if approved by FOOT pursuant to s. 380.06(15)(e)2 Florida Statutes. The Applicant's fair share shall be based pro-rata on traffic generated by the existing Miami Center I project, Southeast Financial Center, traffic attributed to development in the vacant 3 blocks of DuPont Plaza equivalent to that approved by the City in the expired Miami Center II Development Order, and One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phases 1 and 2 separately. No Certificate of Occupancy will be issued for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 2 unless these fair share funds have been used for surface street improvements abutting the project and said improvements have been completed. 17f. If a public sector financing package has not been committed prior to December 31, 1991, then prior to obtaining any building permits for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 2, fund, bond, or provide a letter of credit in the amount of $517,000 (1986 dollars) to the FOOT or, in the alternative, loan said amount to FOOT, if acceptable to FOOT, as the Applicant's fair share contribution to the ;9,7fi3,000 Rrickell Avenue Miami River Bridge replacement, pursuant to Section �80.06 (15)(e)2 F.S. Applicant shall provide the City a letter of credit in said amount (;517,000 in 1985 dollars) to be applied to the construction of the above -described improvement prior to issuance of any (temporary, partial or permanent) certificate of occupancy for Phase I, which letter of credit shall be cancelled if said public sector financing package has been committed for the improvement or five years from the issuance of said letter of credit whichever is earlier, provided however that the letter of credit shall be renewed for an additional five years if required by the Miami City Commission. 17g. If a public sector financing package has not been committed prior to December 31, 1991, then prior to obtaining any building permits for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 2, fund, bond, or provide a letter of credit in the amount of ;5,027,000 (]985 dollars) to FDOT or, in the alternative, loan said amount to FOOT, if acceptable to FDOT, as the Applicant's fair share contribution to the Downtown Distributor bifurcated Ramp System, whose total cost is estimated at ;56 million (1985 dollars), pursuant to Section 380.06(15)(e)2 F.S. Applicant shall provide the city a letter of credit in said amount (;5,027,000 in 1985 dollars) to be applied to the construction of the above -described improvement prior to issuance of any (temporary, partial or permanent) certificate of occupancy for Phase I, which letter of credit shall be cancelled if said public sector financing package has been committed for the improvement or five years from the issuance of said letter of credit whichever is earlier, provided however that the letter of credit shall be renewed for an additional five years if required by the Miami City Commission. Minority Participation 18. Within 6 months of the effective date of this Development Order, prepare a Minority Construction Contractors/Subcontractors Participation Plan and submit it for comment only to the City's Minority Procurement Officer, who will compare it with the objectives of Ordinance 10062, the Minority Procurement Ordinance. 19. Within 6 months from the effective date of this Development Order prepare a Minority Participation and Employment Plan and submit it for count Page 12 of 19 �`"" `� s nr i only to the City's Minority Procurement Officer, who will compare it with the objectives of Ordinance 10062, the Minority Procurement Ordinance. General 20. Integrate all original and supplemental ADA information into a consolidated Application for Development Approval (CADA) and submit two copies of the CADA to the Council, one copy to the City, and one copy to the Florida Department of Community Affairs within thirty (30) days of the effective date of the Development Order. The CADA shall be prepared as follows: 21. 22. a. Where new, clarified, or revised information has been prepared subsequent to submittal of the ADA but prior to issuance of the DO, whether in response to a formal statement of information needed or otherwise, the original pages of the ADA will be replaced with revised pages. b. Revised pages will have a "Page Number (R) - Date" notation, with "Page Number" being the number of the original page, "(R)" indicating that the page was revised, and "Date" stating the date of the revision. c. The letter dated June 18, 1986, executed by the proposed prime contractor for One DuPont Plaza, Pavarini Construction Co. Inc., submitted to the City of Miami Planning Advisory Board at its June 18, 1986 meeting, shall be incorporated into the consolidated Application for Development Approval (CADA). Within 30 days of the effective date of this Development Order, record the Miami Center I Development Order with the Clerk, Dade County Circuit Court, pursuant to Section 380.06(14)(d), Florida Statutes (1985), specifying that the Development Order Exhibit "A" runs with the entire site and that Exhibit "B" runs with the southern portion of Tract D. DUPONT PLAZA (50-11) (AKA One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phases 1 and 2) and is binding on Miami Center Joint Venture, its successors, and/or assigns, jointly or severally. Submit an annual report to the South Florida Regional Planning Council, City, and Florida Department of Community Affairs on each anniversary of the effective date of the Development Order, which report shall include, at a minimum: a. A complete response to each question in Attachment 6. Page 13 of 19 7 b. Identification and description of any changes in the plan of development, or in the representations contained in the ADA, or in the phasing for the reporting year and for the next year, c. A summary comparison of development activity proposed and actually conducted for the year. d. Identification of undeveloped tracts of land, other than individual single family lots, that have been sold to a separate entity or developer. e. Identification and intended use of lands purchased, leased or optioned by the developer adjacent to the project site since the Development Order was issued. f. An assessment of the Applicant's and the local government's compliance with the conditions of approval contained in the DRY Development Order and the commitments which are contained in the Application for Development Approval. g. Specification of any amended DRI Application for Development Approval ;. or requests for a substantial deviation determination that were filed in the reporting year and to be filed during the next year. h. An indication of a change, if any, in local government jurisdiction for any portion of the development since issuance of the Development Order. i. A list of significant local, state and federal permits which have been obtained or which are pending by agency, type of permit, permit number, and purpose of each. j. A statement that all persons have been sent copies of the annual report in conformance with subsections 380.0604) and (16)9 Florida Statutes. k. A copy of any recorded notice of the adoption of the Development. Order or any subsequent modification that was recorded by the Applicant pursuant to Subsection 380.06(14)(d), Florida Statutes. 1. Copies of one of the following documentations of appropriate disposal of all hazardous wastes a hazardous waste manifest, a bill of lading from a bonded hazardous waste transporter indicating shipment to a licensed hazardous waste facility, or a confirmation of receipt of material from a recycler, a waste exchange operation, or other permitted hazardous waste management facility. P4ge 14 of 19 m. For any condition that cannot reasonably be monitored as part of the local permitting and inspection processes, a notarized affidavit assuring compliance with such Development Order conditions shall be included. n. Any other information required by the Department of Community Affair (DCA) in accordance with Section 380.06(14 and (16), Florida Statutes (1985) . THE CITY SHALL 23. Hereby designate the Planning Director to monitor compliance with all conditions of this Development Order. Specific monitoring procedures include: Review and evaluation of the annual report to be submitted by the Applicant by Condition 22 herein; and . Review of Development Order conditions prior to a recommendation that a building permit or Certificate of Occupancy be issued by the City pursuant to Condition 28 herein. 24. Hereby incorporate the One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 1 and 2 timeline (Figure 7). which timeline will be used by the Planning Director in monitoring specific conditions of the Development Order as they relate to city permitting for specific components or phases; provided, however, that deviations from the timeline shall not be construed to be substantial deviations from the terms of this Development Order. 25a. Withhold building permits or Certificates of Occupancy, as the case may be, until the requirements of Conditions 4, 5, 6 and 17a have been met. 25b. Withhold any building permits until the traffic analysis in Condition 17b is approved by FDOT, in writing. The absence of FDOT approval will trigger a question of substantial deviation from the terms of this Development Order. (Note: This requirement has been satisfied because of the letter from the Florida Department of Transportation dated June 24, 1986.) 25c. Pursuant to Section 380.06(15)(e)2, Florida Statutes, withhold issuance of Certificates of Occupancy for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) until all interim road improvements identified in Attachment 5 are constructed as required by Condition 17c. Page 15 of 19 1 fi 25d. Withhold any Certificate of Occupancy for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 1, if funds have not been supplied for Applicant's fair share of the modifications pursuant to Condition 17d if a) the proposed Downtown Development Authority Alternative (Figure 5) with or without b) the Applicant's proposed modifications (Figure 6), are accepted. 25e. Withhold any Certificate of Occupancy for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 1 and building permits for Phase 2 if Applicant's fair share funds for local street improvements, required by Condition 17e have not been deposited; no Certificate of Occupancy will be issued for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 2, unless the above -deposited funds have been applied to construction of the local street improvements abutting the project and said improvements have been completed. The City shall apply the Applicant's fair share funds to streets abutting the project but the City does not guarantee the completion of these improvements. 25f. If a public sector financing package has not been committed prior to December 31, 1991, withhold issuance of any building permits for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 2 until the Applicant funds, bonds, or provides a letter of credit in the amount of $517,000 to FDOT or, in the alternative, loans said amount to FDOT, if acceptable to FDOT, pursuant to Condition 17f. The City shall withhold issuance or any (temporary, partial or permanent) certificate of occupancy for Phase I, until the Applicant provides the City a letter of credit in the amount of ($517,000 in 1985 dollars) to be applied to the construction of the above - described improvements, which letter of credit shall be cancelled if said public sector financing package has been committed for the improvement or five years from the issuance of said letter of credit whichever is earlier, provided however that the letter of credit shall be renewed for an additional five years if required by the Miami City commission. The City does not guarantee the completion of this improvement. 259. If a public sector financing package has not been committed by December 31, 1991, withhold issuance of any building permits for the One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 2 until the Applicant funds bonds, or provides a letter of credit in the amount of $5.027,000 to FDOT or, in the alternative, loans said amount to FDOT, if acceptable FDOT, Page 16 of 19 �. m pursuant to Condition 17g. The City shall withhold issuance of any (temporary, partial or permanent) certificate of occupancy for Phase I, until the Applicant provides the City a letter of credit in the amount of ($5,027,000 in 1955 dollars) to be applied to the construction of the x' above -described improvements, which letter of credit shall be cancelled if r. said public sector financing package has been committed for the improvement or five years from the issuance of said letter of credit 25h. 26. 27. whichever is earlier, provided however that the letter of credit shall be renewed for an additional five years if required by the Miami City commission. The City does not guarantee the completion of this improvement. Withhold issuance of any building permits for the One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A r Biscayne Plaza) Phase 2 portion of the project until a) construction has ,k commenced on (i.e., upon execution of a contract for construction of) the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System and b) the FOOT scheduled completion date for the Ramp System occurs prior to the scheduled completion date of Phase 2, provided further that, in the event that if r= full funding is neither in place nor if construction has not commenced on '> the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System at the time the Applicant applies for a building permit for his Phase 2, then the Applicant may apply to the Miami City Commission to authorize a Phase 2 building permit by amending this Development Order. Hereby, stipulate that this project shall be subject to an impact fee ordinance applicable to the Omni/Downtown/Brickell area, if such ordinance is adopted by the City within 5 years of the effective date of this Development Order, to be paid at the time of issuance of any building permit, provided, however, that funds, (but not loans) required by conditions of this Development Order shall be off -setting credits against separate categories of the impact fees, further provided that no refund will be made if the funds, (but not loans) required by conditions of this Development Order, cumulatively exceed the amount that would otherwise be paid under the separate categories in the impact fee ordinance. Hereby stipulate that for a 5-year period commencing with the effective date of this Development Order, no application for rezoning the southernly 3.01 acres of Tract D, Block I, DuPont Plaza (60-11) will be accepted administratively which a) further restricts the uses allowed; b) reduces the amount of development (square foot area) or intensity (Floor Area Pane 17 of 19 .. 28. Ratio) or c) reduces the density (number of dwelling units or parking spaces) provided in this Development Order; further provided, however, that upon a finding that substantial changes have occurred in the conditions underlying the Development Order; or that the Development Order is based on substantially inaccurate information provided by the Applicant in the amended Application for Development Approval, or that a change is clearly established to be essential to the public health, safety or welfare, the City may downzone the property, further provided that the City may otherwise adopt zoning regulations which do not restrict uses, or reduce density or intensity and other ordinances essential to the public health, safety and welfare which may affect this property. Hereby stipulate that the following actions considered by the South Florida Regional Planning Council in their Report and Recommendations dated February 4, 1986, may be undertaken at the Applicant's option and written notice to the Planning Director with an exception, and will not be considered to be substantial deviations from the terms of this Development Order: Substitution of up to 300,000 square feet of office or use for an equivalent amount of residential use upon the approval of the Miami City Commission, or Relocation or transfer of restaurants, health clubs cabarets and other retail uses and floor areas described in the ADA among the podium or towers of Phases 1 and 2 provided all such commercial space cumulatively does not exceed 220,000 square feet, or Addition to, or deletion of, up to five (5) percent of the gross floor area of either Phases 1 or 2, provided that the cumulative totals of additions and deletions conforms to the parameters in Condition 1. Deletion of up to ten (10) percent of the gross floor area of each Component of either phases 1 or 2, in Condition 1 for Phase 1 or 2; if the total project is reduced by ten (10) percent such reduction shall be proportionate among said Components. . Substitution of the a) DDA modification (Figure 5) or b) the Applicants �r modifications (Figure 6) to the FDOT approved Downtown Distribution Bifurcated Ramp System (Figure 4), as and if approved by FOOT, subject to applicable provisions of Conditions 17d and 17g. . Delays or advances in the timeline specified in Condition 24. Page 18 of 19 29. Stay the effectiveness of this Development Order -- Exhibit "B" - if One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 1 is not under construction within three (B) years from the effective date of this Development Order. "Construction" is defined as the issuance of a foundation building permit and completion of construction allowed by the foundation permit; "effective date" is defined as forty-five (45) days after issuance of this Development Order by the Miami City Commission. In such an event no development permits thereunder shall be granted, until such time as an Amended ADA, providing updated information, is submitted to the Council, City, and State and an Amended Development Order issued. Should the Development Order be stamped pursuant to this Condition and an amended Application for Development Approval as herein provided is not submitted within one year after such stay is imposed, this Development Order - Exhibit "B" - shall expire and shall thereafter have no further force or effect. Exhibit "A" of this Development Order continues to run with the land. FIGURES F; AND ATTACHMENTS r (., r 4 " r 3 t. l 4TER D VELO - PLAN FIGURE1 d A^ .e e j �; • � dr `�� vr1.. f qqr Jdr• •,•+'�, Ile.49 r F. I i is:; ss ` & 41 SOURCE: ADA e- t 1 FIGURE 2IF -17 '•'"•. +, . •'• e• hs ;R a r, r-..".. . A �... _ -�s ��w I• '�jw.b .�1 •a s- .• 1 ••pe• ...•..�• ,' e••me .�_ OF �� •1. �•. ..T , S. ?:� • } \ • • • - . T 1 ,� NUMAL \•!sill! 16 74 9J0000®00® '� • y• •OOOGOOOOOQ "�� ' •% , O000000000 � • • .• ' t7000000000 • �' 00000000000 �� •� •• • 00®000000 •• • OOOOeemOeO ' ' OOee0000v0 ,•� � �' • ommcmmm soeo mcommmmmmmm .. - ���o�oo�ee • •4y • 1 000soeoo�e •• • . • ~r' oeoisoeoeee �• •j • «• ' ee�oeoee000e • .� •.• -f ' '' • o04aeseeoo0 • wa..=* 00000000e . yh _ om0000esee v ,� • . .. • e�sOOMeeO •' ,�••rlle� . a••.�. r.r ..••.�•i•••• ,i r i • _ •Noe000 • w ' ' ' �rooeeeeeee . R•. .. �a ••� j~►1.N• • ' Hr AN MASTER SITE PL o®��osseoe�e .. } •- ;� eeoweoeeoo 'j .�. L1 • ••1•K. • ., . .. o��:.-' :..:'•�,r'; �'�,».' '•;,%•.E.ISCAYNE PLAZA►, �:.. s• .. ' ri � r i�Wrw`►. >��1 1�7�r• a• ... �. j•91�.: ►,�:h�'tiK�' '�ti: ;,' �••' ♦ • '�l!`•�.11•e .�' ,r•t J'_.• w •� . • • . i- FIGURE 3 BIS(AYNE PLAZA SOUT&LEVATION FIGURE 4 CLEVMT FWT DESI GN• -0 F OR TW I DOMTOM AW SYS1SA DISMM, HOR BIFURCATM R CHCPW 0: Iloilo PIAZA im— all SE M ST. _ I �' ( I t a SMTICASI 61WACIAt LINVIN ftat III (ARAU AM P41AII ItASi IRVAC3A, lit -SE- 3 AD 3 of El - a r me"M iii pM•�Y •. ti aMOr M. i� II I i 1 •. •• •wr.wnr••rw �� jilll' • •! V '9 • I •a a./ It.m • �r . ................... 1 V I • t� • ® `1 fi��%� 1 1 i %�"111 I 1.. 31 = �UL s• s �� • le- i . • • �� s .� 1► ONO 408149 *�"..rw��,,., _�� �'�.,..,ii: t,A3!a�ll"eierli+pr:f►sal�• v..•....r...� � • • � g - ' ...»...r. ) ilia a•.•rfr� r �'�--_ter.• �.r - - f""Os•a.rl of to aver" RAN ••p.w• amsoftm r.•. •...P• �•..' i ,+nO�a11 iA(,N..tM131fSIbY i '• ! #IUIVlNa1QlUlot1i11Wt IX%ILhWypt A111/MWIII 41111M/411Y1 1 p�M4rM1 !1 • • e 1 erry issu oEVVjcPmWObEll CITY DUES CITY ISSUES CBMFKNTE /INLDW PERMIT oU1LDM POW FOR PHASE 1 OF OCI27PAN6Y (PH I) (PN 21 COMPLETION OF VWECTW DATE START OF OONSTRIICTION O41 I 1 CORSORUCTION W 1) j 1986 , 1967 1988 1989 ) - nME LINE (IN MONTHS) CDIIO1TIOtIS coN011}mo ullb. COMMON1 01-6 comm.loNs nix" CONDITIONS (STIM OF COI ST01cm 21 2.31 CWOTM z3 C47IIOITIQI K OOIfO1T1OIIS 1.4.'Ir(i.7.l,q �IOITTONS 4.Sr7.2Se.2Se.23/.2Se.2Sf.2Ss. CONDITIONS 1.4. COMMON 7 133,14.15.ire, I7e.2Se. 7.10,11.13.14.IS.17e. f7f.17o.t>t.11.28e. 25f.259.25A. 2e DONO1TTa n 2XV CONDMIONS 174. Fh.12 JLCOMIIION • 17f. n! CfTY IUMS Cal FWATE OF OCCUPANCY (PH 21 COMP(17M OF CONSTRICTION (PM 2) PUKJc SECTOR nun=MO f+AERAGE 1991 CONDITIONS 22.23.24 CONDITION 0,256 common a OEV[icPIINT ORDER OECEMNER 31.0% OR SOOMtJI on AT THE LAI= 3Y JULORY 1.2000 NOTE THE TEXT CF TILE mvELWNW 1M(OEf!GOWERNS DEVIATIONS FROM 7111s TIMELINE ARE NOf CONSIOERW M (fE SUSTAKnAL OEI9ATIOMS. CITY Or ~ PLAN" Oovjm w REV: 6fas !s O'Cal"NKIP Was scrcir etv.osAtuN tlsrell asciri rcrtir fervosby isusrt Uscirt Citrus tarr#i$o• tMiwrir frysial Acarss ts►•to ISMNiurl Citrus rrtic•astge iMlmrusis Trslstal C#rsis He80/trr6808 arllhtil froarNis ress tiltc% oppltt pt$y Cape #tyro total CoCCOIGM #eversolodas 9tf 9.a. tar.i Arres$tr.. ras•rts/11••sar ep$rsa getup Cacc•Idr lrss#ulrrr #!d a f ! s• rvlcr.rb furl.«s gl•cM •M!r#•rl sea lrsprl Caccelebe witrrr #US Ira") Mrssrir sctl••tApiH fScM/Nrrrl Caccrtlrl.s. •rq"fsts Isoarlss saivsr !•cods, iucorrsS 1ld lsolives pa t■i • 4$•rr $tarrlr tCrrb iayit CocAl•$t$raur vitillefaum I!•tIvemp free) lrfis c•slfsfr tRlr#r plal. #etas sailers, %" Ws flfsp )a camet, trial 30, Caulogrr r•..stacghslr OPWOWS6111CMKOr Cs.ecrrtrs srrcts• 1111•fforu00da . e lltst•.oai ryfld•sr tErect NttiNroyl trs arsct•s $aracre 15/174r awffm■..o/t Cron$ same $0.0 lbttisiru$t O Carus $Master• 1$:•if•r $reel Csrrllr •laterses full# cla.ryrt Oslrrl. r•sars iftyal pe/rcarrrt C•ssar NsiulN tGot#•w $•a.srt !rp•t•m ist•rliarr• t8i•irM tlw/ Collis taalrr#ra tCr#s•t tr/skstrpr jrp«Itrr dtlslwit/ p'«rMb►r• $►►. INSus•bl# tout ErrtAl•r tristr�fsillla tCscl!$tur Cor• -frNi i Clrrrs►otf MnllOisr Itmot.s. Eqs•/i «au•r1S-esldatr Sfmppr►s1 s ho mat CAq►lsls Erf$.Ir cs.t.$r a91a# slmlMrst i $ $prclos• #roes$ Sur Mort E.!•.fa fastlds ep«Isr st•ptsrsl CMptrilrac.,ws 1u0asc**%9 iMacr `•la„ O%#slrscrr phi pwlsophtl/um elivllr►m pla$ cltrieaua /SAsrt irri lots m z iSMIN10N; Curs rw+MllloilN INow '. firovillos baksof lamit Sr.villrr? 11rN -+ •0 ti�11/N ��f�� Isll• ei�Ul *wF Irp t►N, aN far ►wedentlal . teelece• "Move Illp-rlt«I loan cesslae /Nlres befell JecrwM acetlfellas IiscrMMl leaiperes sllflcksle ISeeth" red ce/ri UreleerMrren larreass oboe* Irwwedl telarstromis ladlcat forate-Myrtles laleacelarle relemose 11kIte assa�►�rel ticrle triage Bell Ilcerlel dews* Orandise Iticesl• pelts ticwi*.stP.s ILlcwle pint tlsllem* -ata*a-- is 11111d maenads t/silws letlsllalee fillet temerledt ftellbre 6861•asle ovoid di1111 Mastic odemdres 066/1dlssbwa INtstlel Mee A1brldso IIIe•••e1 110roce earlier* ISoaathwo No nlrtles rarsleg"Is, ecaleates 1lereselw Shores (bras tltitaPlere• IMne• Ivillae pl*cl••el Maws cows• Is"d PIas1 Pines •Illotll Islas• PUast Plaes •Illotll war. cer1608.1" al*" tines Plsclde PIscipula• $Jamaica alelowds Pisan$* 10"110104 legally) PoM•N*, yl.• Ilrt�ayiP«I1 Pblactsae Nlcdwroas Ifterf paiaaclea•1 PseedOPl+MMIX srtsatll fltarlde cwerrl al.1 P*Wchospomo slow$ 13e4frotAla total Mtcasprate a•cartherel INKArttwr tabs! Owrces wirllalne /llae 001 Mlt•tsera aawll• In" awlrsnsl 11019to•ea •late Iftyaf Palms bTsto••* se'le lca6sn royal Palo, Safe a/wtte Icabbep Palms serMoe rapes Is" takettel slaaroMe $lseca fPradiso trees Set•teto• aMoteal 184st ladies mabolmll . Twos,* r'at•ep f3ree of Moods T""l• Pe/tld•a ilia! trMPat Irssl Tasereades ladica® #India ISWIadl Twelaelle cate"D lTrepical shoed) 14ao41"s ICWGSsl Tbest•sla PoPela•ae lfgrtto tree, s•asode eMeal Throe" morrlsll hews thatch metal Thrlaea persillore 13satc% Palms Thriven radiate Irferide thatch alum lhrlaac sell. Match Palmt unkl ytar rosests 1wast,laytsa Palo$ Mtrr' p Lott[ sPscar4 fI Ll F ' SMeis. siwN. and Oro1M/ cwNf Costs$ sop. f%pIrN loop 11I11"sfbece barcbsssaaa fralse arelloo Ac•IMbs b1y1�M Iftaallls llMfl IlaloaM• vlscets flraisb 144111 .. Acsl •Ilt►stl•iye / INIIi® p/)label It►ooe4bell) 1 1 Alscesls s». IElsrbwf wl Eraoefbews arsssrM Bliss so") Alplals sp. Isbell flow) EsEneld omillorls fameits stalwo Awenl"m ITercb glows Evvoia confess IA" berry) Arolisis baul• /Clrlsfnss bwgl Eoolewls feato" 011001,11 st"Wl Nasf s ftwo s sM. IAMrlss feral Es'sals alrfslalas I'3,asisb seayar/ rorestoars sesrawa ItooriAa lrowfl MPwls sp.w Ili bepl•1 ' Nescrwse racsrsst• Irlsap!•111 Parolee)• �stslwoo®ss® Itarolsoelal CSNIro ®oscalar 131olly) 90 Iwvi11N 1laiorws s»• Isos�f�r111N1 .o Ila.afls ®atews Iscarlaebssae® /Irebss 1 ' ' itrwsal• scfiaor1er11• /sorbs/fler•1 ftd* also eorawaris® tflvefrtly 111110 evrewhs osclfs #LocwNrryl MNycAlen flaysa I'lalles lolly) Glllaaolra bawafecorbsl• IPW&rwl/l IlMyclelas laronerlsom ollalelol foloys k Calflcrps aurlcMs IAwicaa besstlboMl - NsAycbims W. I61W I9liyl Csysls red1cawse Itrswraf vlMl Ilsllaatbss ®i IMS IAsacte sswfla.arl Gsfls sN.e IGsslsl MobIKes rsss-siwewsis® Itllboscwl Gssls MA slse of moss fart 11,00:glNNl 1%-1 -cellos )$idol/ac Ispider Iloilo slaws$ Icaco It= stabras /6811borry3 7 � C/Nir' ISwlrassl Iles vaslfarls morns Iltwart y� bull to4lseM verleyeluM Maims Ipsaose s,/. I/balog llarles, retire" venal Covocrlvs oreclvs Wrote bsefonvoa0s -� Owe frectewscons !lash olotsrl Cowocaryrs a.ereees swrtcevs ISlovoer batlow.orys Owe i3 twbrlcees escnwse wKts *Ierr/ tegoolwla ®ermsts I9oe.00sl I � ... ..- ; ,. .: �� - - _ ... „�,... ... r_ �... , ... _ .._ , . , . , ._:,... ,.�... .�.. _ , .. - r::a d.u.5:� c7;.5•w.9s'7%�it':�`aCf�''v:�a'�•k��, w_,... r . r„ .. .. . - ._ _ Jc4r•�As 86111111400 llsrssrlMl /eslrerlls culesesls sallssssris• Uselpars/ 1MI�erM pelrfM ISM►• juallierl LsWstreewi• tailless lGrOW0110110 tests**dress• lose# lealewel tests" malsefMNls fowl Issfeas$ tlswere� s/p•• Orleafl fists. tlNe�a sescerif lusty fslril Mrrcleellies fregrees Isisps" slels►f Mpelrie csrtt/lers• IJaWksloal Mlrice cerstere tSautbwa een aryrfle• ,lelse►ry$ Neynreteyls toseMlsrsH I�esfM esnl 0 4s1•lelon �eysltes• Ilbns• greets f�eresle dfHlfs101a Il�syerals/ ; #'sore• wta►Ills• 11)sees•s er•sHt 'A•eswls ""Isss• /feed slsNrl f ils*W&On sh.• IGltors. yAll•isnilrMl plan e11161186 vsrlstt Mass IMM casts pit*$ • ssi rltMtsitlsA Ial"Osse• 1dlsd�ieN1 'isaerl• +N. Irrawsl/astl ` flseocer/•• sM ° llOeocslr/esl s+slyss es bellssrlar,e• Idetfsnr seats•$ *pwteeer lsl IFICkereisee/l E_ Psychatrle aervese 40I11d costs*$ Newts• @Mosel* f�sMla. mite Isdise bmis Itsyessle •yfsnt►i"is Illsril" Ole" $"Silvio fllrrembs"s $COMle steeled Ifeliserryl sclrps /oe/rs "s scows fsesntess lnm$IWS peso sts"14*100 suns• I10I3e0 elder/ sae i sse see i t l•s 'flay ceders tecs•rss COWSIs IGyo seneyssldlsl Ts"Wit" ICyOress) 110cuagets Casewals Ica" NOaeyaecstet Tetretysls Water ITelrstygle, most 44140 Ills) Ttrwsersle erects• Mass - tes.11e/ . TlssNersle s".• ICIOC% vine) twellis slaece 11bgrellls) lest"leeyerap IMPING14es• ICrsn/edrate Jeslse$ unless ssnlcetats Ise• eelsl Viburnum astsysntsss• #sod&*" vl♦strawl Yucca aley"tiles ISrsaeless Tascc•1 Jamie flerlstame tomatoes 180/I4nyls• fasere 111114 /Mel 1tET1 • E•olic slectH SOWCei . S 2 ASK Ar+; rNQN CONWANY w n MIAMI. /t,UR10A W31 � ' " �•9c" �{ ' 1t�C•'ep •r ., i i (Jost 371.4200 ;I!^•i . ••, . • n� • 1M�i se • e's'..e r1 • ..�u lr H®LYWELL . ' . .. •.. ' . -� • . _ Mr. Moward Gary .. .. •®• •• :• .•:•..: City Manager' .. ..-•'•..:....�. • .: ..; .:_- •:.. '':: ®" `®� � • iq.v r•�.•�: .• " ..... •• CITY OF MIAMi • • • • �:. '; 3300 Pan American Drive _- ..• • '� . • .'-"• �. "-; • ' :� �' r Miami, Florida 33133 �' .'; •.�• :..:' '�. ;;. ' ,�® z. ; •, :» :, Dear Mr. Gary:W. •saw. .• d .. • " ' � . • . - The :iolywefl Construetion �dom.pan;and Mr. Theodore a.• Could; ' -.("Developer'l hereby submit for your eonsileration the following .proposfiV - ' =•• -for the temporary use of the south -end Band .hell area of Baytront Park. .:. . 1. The City of Miami ("City grams to uevelo'Rer 0ut•exclusive use of the. Bandshell area of Dayfr•.nt as clitlined on Exhibit ,Park attached herdto. .. . . 2. Developer agrees that no "batch-ng plant" will be erected on said property, and that the property will be -ised to park construction == • • trailers and parking for the emp!:, --s of Deve!o, its .� contractor, sub -contractors, afti iates =nd related entities. -=, 3. The term of this Agreement shall commence an 3uly I, 19SI and s: end on February 22, 1982, both dates inclusive. : =.'.. .._ 4. in consideration thereof, Develo; _r agr^es to: (a) Pay to the City a monthly sum of rive Thouwnd Dollars ($3,000), stirs sum to be paid to the Trus. Account established for the Rcdcvelopmen,. of Osy:ront Park; (b) Pay all costs for the demolition and r; moval of the existing ----- Dandshell; i -•- -• -j (e) Allow the cositinuct! opera ion of the pdt!.ing lot los:ated on --_:::�:.. _. ,_ _' ' • tllock 2 of DuPont Plaza; ' • • _ :_ • (d) Fence the perimeter of :aid nandshell jt'ot+ and provide •' - _••_ . security liersonuci to pats -I said area'on a full-time, 24• „ _ _,, hour•day basis; . «. �..�.�...•P...,�.�..,•.� A-11 ...._.. . .. Y/� t.yM. ' �.� •�.• •i•r!• V•' M •�/•i•.� A .� •i •��!.... .• w�."w cf •I .r'•. �•. •... �w � . • ' �wM•i�_ . �MIL ��� f �"r.rlr..irA�iY•�-• .%��.iL r.�•��iw� w�.�r•.•.— r i • 3. _ The Developer further agrees that: (a) No trees will be removed from the Park area except as _ may be necessary to demolish the Qandshell; - • _ ..:'. (b) No pert of Biscayne Boulevard or BiscayneBoulevardway • - . will be closed to public traffic, except, when necessary, •• • • those portions where easements exist to install or service ' • ' = •- •-•,•: utility lines, storm sewers, telephone equipment and such . •,.. ' other under street work as may be necessary from time to time. •• .. . f .'. h.•�_ ••O •- • • The • •+a•• ,. �..•,. . • .•••r•• •er• •.• t•�•••..�. s. �- '•. e•e•..._ 6 City of , Miami and •Developer agree to enter Into •• negotiations for the funding of a fountain ,In •the _pr4Aosed : '•• •ic Noguchi Park. In the event an agreement cannot 06, reached = post regarding the funding ofsaid fountain, Developer #Aceel. that, tt- swsequent to the expiration of the Agreement; "arid at the ..' request of the City, it will sod the area described hglein. •• t Upon your acceptance of thiv Agreement, Oeveloper and"City will be - bound by the terms outlined above, for the term herein specified. Sincerely yours, • ~ • t. �.: ;: ., '~• H 0 L Y W E L L CCVSTRUCTIOMPANY _ - '' - gy:, .• - - - - -• Theodore B. Gould . Agreed to and Accepted: T:.S • _ City of Miami CITY cL_4r; By: 20W.rd Gary - —City hlanacer ... Ct: �• r•t r;; .i ' ' � r.�•%.�•9•.=•'�.�+i: i•'' .i.ili.Y►:i'��'"�. ��•�i -=./� lf«�•�Ir�j`•.r•'��.i./��•�a�'�''e�••••T•� Y.i :tiiY �..+-: .iii ir�••.i�: q;;ittt of wiwmcz A. Reame • WAVOO 20 May 1985 k.. 1 Mr. Theodore Gould, General Partner Miami Center Limited Partnership 300 Miami Center 100 Chopin Plata Miami, Florida 33131 Dear Ted:. r� W.G. son 23 Qle� mass". F%O".QA 30 a too -!TO 0010 6 CC j `k • � q The Miami City Commission is presently considering whether or not to proceed with the present plans for the redevelopment of Bayfront Park. These plans would involve the removal of the former library building and the.full development of the Noguchi plan. At our last meeting, Commissioners expressed concern over the amount of private funds committed to the redevelopment effort since the funds raised to date fall far short of those needed.. . In 1982, during an earlier debate over the fate of the former library building, I attempted to indicate to the Commission the scope of private sector commitments to the park redevelopment program. I read into the record your letter of July 20. 1902. which indicated that you were, "prepared to provide the materials and to construct that portion of the Noguchi design adjacent to Chopin Plaza at the south end of the park." This commitment was contingent upon the City moving forward with its plan. Your wl"IIingness to assist us in our funding and Construction offurts, of course, came after several meetings with the designer and staff who altered their designs several times prior to <t meeting with your approval. The City has altered its plans forr the south end of the park to complement the Miami Center project and we would now like to proceed with implementation. A lot of progress has been made in funding Bayfront Park and we are much closer to our goal of full funding. I need your help now in moving this project forward. Although you have taken no • action to date on our offer to assist its with Y park development, we would hope that you would now come forward to help make this project a reality. The Miami City Commission will hear this mstter again on flay 23. Your willingness to honor your Commitment would go a long way in helping us realize -this cruciat project. L Sincerely, r 4G ce A. Ferro ,;. CC:. Commission AIembcrf Pereira �r�•r • N � TAT+ A�Ti..��� � j �rr.�•�i�I� • ' R �.1 .y � •. s. M+�..j•.. � �� aavar� •• vLai v�.il\1 V1�.71 1V�� 01:11'I. Vilgiilkl :',19oli Ethan P. Minsky, Esq. Shea a Go= ;. 11wW1 drickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131 Re: ea;front ParK t' Lear Ethan: ,t. ,di1•(� (l•t (��ahl t;hat'b�u�•�� ills. �'il �;llia=-'`•ll l l _:. It has been brought to my attention. that the City Plannin- CV--azt-re^.':, recormnenoat ions for the Amended Development Application concerning nirth Ca.'s proposed Biscayne Plaza project to be developed as the �nn-:act .' purchaser of the remainde. of the land on Tract D include $1,11CO,CCC f.: t in3rovements in Eayfront Park. I understand that it has Been Mo' w 11 Co I .y a rporat�on and agreed to contribute $1,0^r,jv-- rede•felopment of Eayfront Park. This allegation is false as t-te correspondence and transcripts of City Commission hearings inCi:ates. .Holywell's obligation was limited to providing sod for too ta^aSr-al'. area. It is my recollection that in ,;anuary, 1933, *,ien a11. wit. Corporation proposed to resod the bandshell area, Mr. Gary sent me a ^c=i_4 specifically instructing Molywell to refrain from placing; sod in the banoshell area. The so-called $1,000,00u contribution noes not exist. In July, ty8;:, Holywell offered to provide the materials and *o construct the portion of the Nogucni design adjacent to Chopin Plaza as a Philanthropic tax de3uction proposal, subject to the City of 'Miami proceeding iminediate.� w:tn its plans to redevelop Sayfront Park. Pour years nave elapse-- arid conditions have changed. ►olywell does not have a need for tax deductions. moreover, ►•+olywell does not have an interest in Miami. Sy urs, Theodore 8. Gould f al Attachment$ cc: Russell wirtn Sergio Rodriguez hiller oawkins 4 ATTACHMENT 3 DE FOR VASTE 7YPES COM"nMLY ASSOCIATED W]TR EACH SIC 2NCiS`AY 1 e . LIST a POTNUAL SAUUMS WASTR tx,itRAMS n StC COD10 SIC wages Two ffee-Ipolsw 111 faits Aft Core frill ABC castes of/t AK tobacco Sic Yasle two eascsip/lee Code V. 1 pod Lt llsef ies Sea Tbvst ibes$ laser lots LT cases and Classes web Ills LOW Iscaestams soma to wdatiaw Uae6 also AL/UT Species leads 3444/ac14e2 ♦Ill 40161 AK ABC Saes* Ceapg Welflablo old Ielae loner. loll-Iste! RttltrAC3lft1MG IMASSTtfIs fill AK &coy Craps :roll Csa.ema Spoeisssios f/t4 AK tU@N hest irewas IMI Closed smd COROA Jeri% sad Soslasds oleo -AK roivelao i Plaricollore ♦ aerosol hedeele last Lie stood wree tabcac aeills. sisal sits AK Creole$ Bares, oeiessior Crop ilia to Wastes fell Lrea*tb sma gap,? Tssitll sill AK 8*61 CoWit rsedlo$* Iatd am mafiosi. escape araese's 31033 lfataa A Saar sea$• flit AK Beef Cattle, *State 94*41e44 1*.f.6 Resebsel Bast I11 twat roomcovrst 43331 10ae4 AK Shoop aid Coal fares aria LM tail tiedeosOso Rails oleo Ail Geor*$ Laoeotoc6 lisp LM Cereals* seat 126ric Ai,lls sell AKT sail Ptopas@eisw Steotess else L't apart lest 226eic sI113 Goal AKT Crop Plaalie*. Celtivstles, 04 Frstseelso mass eel Emitting 311111, sot flat LNT Crop lasrvo@tiwe. Pelaorlar or laabla 2261 LN risisbore to stood ear** Is6r cs *f cacise 0034 1 Callao Cissis* 2261 to Psaisheas of 'clod Voice 716c3cs i91 'lea-aloAo seas AT "wows$ Crop Services fibee and U lk else A Livoolocb Services, •Butt Services fee Wool 3269 LM ►ialsbeee of troad Users 186f eta. DOsw-.Damao 71,br. Specialist*@ smd silk •lea A Lena end Corte• fee@Iees also Lee Vows* Carpets OW Cola• - fael AT freaotetsl Shtv6 and Tess 114rolese HIS L11 Ta/god targets and soot • sits 1,01 Carpota see Uo,s. NO: a► m all -feel: falstn 3614 JSLI go" lilebew t:abiaoss •� NIS JrLT voodoo" 1po"Or and P13taed o► "is AK Tooker Treese 2416 JtLI S*ftesad Tamest sea 717••ood Nat AK feef@t wcseetse ♦ T!N SOW 6411beeles ♦ 26s1 JALT I%biie Ile' Iatrectiss 301 JALI Prefabricased 'Teed loildiass sad camp~%% 01U , AKI roselor Services Iss1 a wad Ptfeeteifl • 1491 LTV rarliclobsar4 1611-1799: CONSISM140 also JgL'R $tad 11"Icheld !Shatter*. *step/ I>p6s'oslsec*,1 IS14 stato Motes wde*beld Istsiaaare 16I/ //YtT Mi bars and Street caw@Is+gttlM i r Isat JtL'11 VOW Tt @wad aedio cabinet$ 1611 . LIMIT feil*e, towel. Sad !,footed MieMap Coestredlee Is19 ist'll ams"s Iosailaws, TtC loll ►t floobiae. Wealies toacept ell -trice "A Air rill At'1I Nome s/oiee Fula®taro Cemdttsemaa* sill sum Regal attic* Yeasiants 3 Mt XL1 Psiatiat. Paper lasweiSe. set Mcsrstiss. larger IS41 J;LRT so" Pa*tisiana@ .sea risleeog C4001910946001. KC 1142 It*" proof rartiliaee mama liaeaces _ 1141 LT Torceaas. Tiff. marble, gel Msesif nob 2611 Ludt salt maths tilt SILT floes Lolist and Oaber flata.stb, IRIC 2421 LM►II Papor'lills. Iscops 3vi,ld3os reves'tifls 1611 1,8111,111 reperboard @Riaaa r *Each ta$ i vour boo been Identified as a talon11al Ba*rater of holardees a•s@ 1441 11.0, Fargo cam$iaa sad clasiat � so $be ►eras shot abe idester oar **mesa$* caerssive. costlier. igestsbaf. 2441 lap Belo• tseept 9*414ne gage •WIar t*eve tastes. rat Ossetic. Sit code Was. Soot Peeoaesties See•aceo. It♦9 str ea* -eat ceps aid r"WIh*sr,d and CA1461,33t to a fe!Cnoiei **a.eatse of logic pOatIcads tastes. Inch SIC code listed in Ida Ott rrr84*4 awl s+ldod rely r0o4s lahle t hoe pr*Swear boom, aac.tersr*d as the Issora$dee ae a `$*n$a^^I Pest air csaoe#l*d retie Sea var6*1"bo1e,d r?,d4ql . -?I &"Wrotei a1 hassrdeve waste. INS IlP a!•Ney POp*•a,..*ed 2404*S '412 IlP are.or rOIW86 led taeoe laic a Roe •lso«bpee elseeklitd Ibis edefevagra and 30I54 13bry aloe*,a 4• Si,s� i 11C Rota two sae Baese foss 4scrirtlee C.a. Code • lest $In Seel/sap too Cea/sswot% Mo L Mseo A $bus car 3i.rb a Plsalaage lN♦ 1LPl ItNr Came, Tubes.Noss. andsiseilas hed.rte lose L Lose&*, Aaoees t Asti*ns Vise twig vealaiwg Fspsr 04 geildi" Doled Mills 1144 L 0000e06 Is"Wsr, t*c*t@ Athosdie logo NILW4 rewspapess. rublishise sad valued" 116e L Legasee a►so •ILWO •hriedsesles Febliabisg A Pcia/dos lips L owes's 1lsodb*22 L P*esas logo NILS" Bgebs: 00061106ins sea hissios lip: L hrseaasl Loathes S*aads loll OIL O Bs*► Mallse 11110 L Leather Casda, feet' less •ILWO Commercial hlotiog. Lttltrpross asa acseea fill ft Flat Close list •ILNf Commercial Feiotles. Lish"ra/Lie ltsl AL arirb sod Slrvelveal Claf Tajo lest NILOPQ Ingrevisg a" ►Ills hissise MI let Ceramic Hull and "fear 'lily arse, NILWQ Cae.reeist Peistisg. Classes its! e11L village* ;hiss Plembsam pantvrea and Aef%radw Me •ILOfi 11*061e16 Business looses Aaressetass lit$ MlLgfq Creetloo Cold Pubiisbles Mo At siet"We aChis* labi. and Rise%#% Articles last *It@" tioubbo"*, LogsNeof ginkgo@ sag,,,la9s lad At tine Ietllieawalt 1lgtalasaa80l 9*bias L 3saaAarw lest •ILWQ asobbisdiag sea •elated tooth . Articles also Alto" iyrtsellies Ion At ►orct'ais ilecprical 3us,v:li®s Isla l Alba'ive awl chlooloo %`%% Jet Perrtty Ptadvrla. vic left 60" ioorgewic Pigseels l:ee t Abrasive, Pted.acas Mo pava sv Indeseetel loors"Ic Cbealtele. WC 133 Lf 6606o10. Psclaag anal gva/ass Devices lit% LIM Pleetits, Msetriste. Iggibelie swiss, lea silt v asset fate*r*s. Srovi eeatlis, and 204l3ws 11111c 1Nu-valcosil4ble tlastwste silt I UKse*nvtsslvrsatsl Psejec's --1 alit LMt: lyulbolic "bet Ills l foes' Visa arawan,g and SAor1 Nall VW 39ibta Veto AWTV CNiatooie Nan -made Fibers Ills I Cold 11611e4 site) %vse;'34ti7, and sat, late, tMtl syetbstic Ngonic a teeo. mopt tellafosle sell f $test Pape and 'Debts tell Biological /redwcts 1I`1 I Cray Igoe Iavadties tell Ale/iciest• awl eo/onies'a 1st? I 1lslltah1v Igoe Jsen9ries 111I4 lF hsrsacestical hepolotisss N!s I $evil $sundries. 1 or lets PLIM Soar and global gttergeshs mope fFsela1111 sell I lrisary SwIllog add 1lvf.iwiwg of toed Cloeuet* 11e/ I Prisars Sarlsags sad 3013631003 of 3a14c 1/41 AL11/II spvcielel clessoea, Pollsbas, "a 1881Is11a4 VIA I vaiaeste Pr*duessaw ad lommim"m Preparations silo f vtisecv Seel3iet =4 'Selanioss If agw+latttasa e I") IL11R Swrtecv Actiov Agtsls, Flalsblss assets, Owosso. Sot $wltonaeva Oslo, a" Aall*sonls sbl v S*caadefl 1ar11isg and 307aai s easel lavwfass�ua 'fit- ILL! Pvelwars. Cossrtics. sed Of%#$ lsilst Fropstatlese Iletass Soso ' t6LWI ►*iw1 and Allied ►roduce@ sill MOU"m gelling. grswiss and 1241e01isp 32 Ca+ypva lei . LAIITI cwe sod Wog Cbfoirolo also ML!NAIaI Ala niwas SAsvt. Plate and 7s07 VAN t Cyclic Itasrl i*ro Credos, asp hello satetardiettss slot M11PW Alesisew Isataded Prodects D►ve. all Organic ►ioneer* Itsbsa end lentos/ IM gUbPa/ Alsssiuuas 2*I3isg and &*&,i", oa lets MPII Industries Orgonie CAeoieels. KC Ills NL#ll" Bellies, grawise a" 11*13vatias of 3106101700„ Ie91 Oitragvww* feeriiitere Aortal. laeept ceostr and yAiwaln'm 1e/t AKtW heticidr sod Agricallaral 0-micals. INK lost MlelOfaf hswiog and 1e*u8e2343 of 31*81111dus 'ves;t logo Adhesives sod $**lamas I1411 1 Aluminum foundries I,Cassanssl soot g*plosivea 11b: f Blase, sr*nrv, copper and ;:aapny 1!e®a A11ev sail ICLIAP Patnrtes tab foundries 1e99 ~1V Cataical ►reverolloss IKp l /swttttaws f*uwdrios 1Cast3124 , IDQC slit IF Petroleum, astiwios 1Na iltunmv Ibtal spot lsostsus lost I Asshoss Peet* owd ClotInge ills MMP" Prasof• Xvte! P-1twaafa3. Ae0 loll I Lap►catosime title *ad coveave sal MA Nrtel Case loss t Pfgdaicrs gl'/Na*Ifrw *wd Cgs', BCC t+l! tlleAlleaVe Wool Sane®ins aafrsl+. 190014. I'V21. ,wet Nit" Am "Socelleseanacn flostic faaadecto Aelaao aadesaassaai 1lli t tf*tl►rf i*wnaeg sw/ Iiea*Atws I6!1 eAai11ry1 CIA$ rot . IRK dole "a oesesi►tiaa 1411 a1110►A Mood a" trte teele. 18c004 Nubia* tools am Mat Sots 1415 IILIIpNt mead store 6. sat Slades 909 Item t4. SIC 1411 aLMAFQ' tnaarlel Iron ape Notes sM/soft got 14/1 a1JN/pr ►Itaabiet helsee foliate aM isle tosses cowls i 1411 at110FQt aestiet tpipseat. 44t*►t tlectele sad Yore ate Insoles 1441 aiowa fabricated S/sacteral 14ts1 laic 0111.1101001111 Mrtol hats, so*%, haste, 91oldlesso saw sties IM41 MLMOfpf fabricated plait Verb 1444 aUM41 peat **tot sorb 1446 KNOW 4rebitecteral sea orsenwal Mots% tlwb I440 ailNtlpl faetabviceled Wool oaildisess saw Cosfaseats 1449 11Lmm tlietellaete+e Metal w.b Me NLIKWW st000 aecbaat ►eadoeto 1411 ataONT Sells, Note, Strong, 110e100 Mop raMate k61 aL11BFaf Iran and stet/ Fargiege lit at"PrQT 4aaswtise stoo►iess 16e9 aMMM foal stoapiese, KC 1411 111,1011040111 tlectooplatieg. ►ollNlso. ifatlst. Aaadlalat. sad Celattet 14/9 amyr Csstity. Zagraviet. seed Allied Ssseltaa, KC 1481 wall 4rss Aaarawaition Mt/ anrtoeities. escape 14t stall Area. MC Dip 1400 Otdeoec* sad Accessories, ate I M1 tlXlbff steed. Cos, ate Mrdrealle t*t►iates `• Oslo oLMW /•broad ea■e.+etisa tasia*s. KC Isis a NNW tars aacbisttr saw ttoiforst IS14 *UMW Cordea tractors i Lama t Gerdes I"IP eel M11 aLNOM Co*0lrsrtieta MatlaierrF seed t`oiretal 1111 11I0110M aaaieg NocAieety awl Equipwas. *ecs►t all field flits MLMDWT Ott Field 110cbse0tF and tSriryst His MINn►Q Cooper*** Nei Conveying tgoip»nt Hot M mrgf ladesttial Tracks. Tractors. 1r411611e. sad $Roche#• Due aLM mf Mocbie0 tools. Melol Carttlst 1S41 011,141010" 11061hier toale. Metal F*taiwg 1144 "mmv species ,part sea 104t0. fait sets. Aso ad fastates. Nei ladnottiol aside HAS 011"Pi R Matlaiee %*1 accessories a Messaylet Devices IS46 a1MMpT ►over prives Magid tool* 11410 MIM MV UP401 IresUae Moclaiever, PIC list 11IMP111 lead ►tndarie Matban*tr 1111 alasrrap lvetile MOcbievrr IS11 MLMWQT U*0dweekins Mschiever Iris N1m/'4w tope 104080fiee Mstblaotg 1111 IIINtarlir ►t ewe ies 1**400 M0c binreF ens spud fears/ MI #Isatrop special ladr*tyr MOtblarty, ate M1 MltMartlr F-�p0 004 twerine tswipvnt 1/41 RIJ1u/411 pall laad Belles ao*ooa0 Ric 0 not tlaeaAatre 0100e116e4 sic waste two oirectipliew Cede • 1161 UUM" Sit sad Cos Cssptrsasts 114: 0W" •boar• end ZOtaa*94 Frstilatioa toes 1N1 AL`IM4r ltw*striol FtOares looses•• a wrss IS411 11LI01M+1'll MwcAseicas tenor 18004ei*s180 34oipret. "T 1149 attww C0e0141 laih®asiss xWtio*17 Ned 10eeapn.*4, at' Isis IKM " 110ctyspic temp*®one 24virep at 111� aL'1MQ Calcalatina s dcrauntawg ata*Waa'ja Littleenie AO•sirnvat )$14 MLIP019 colic* Mariiiw*s. MIT 001 aLVIM Cassrfeial Las41*q, sty C10901OC, and 97-73-.- I3 aacbiaes lei$ "LIU" air Caedili*elegt and Vag* A17 avati 3409,iPn•113 aid Iooseyeaal Ned 144004131,*3 4rJ7i1v1t3s.P" tjoirwvnt 11B6 saw" 14401661ee awl itgaresine 'a 11410 IIL'M P9 frrvic* 3011014487 44K%i4r®, INC 1101 a1NOM Ceebyert*ts. Fi32000. Hoop® 33093 1 141*01 000 NLgnpw aacbtnrty. Tattoo 11013yiaa3. NZ 11.0 IRIW Qf tower. eiatsitteati0n sea SWCWfy Isansl,*ea'n71 141I am" snatcbgeae sad sviisueaea ag00ratw� 1401 MLalOOQ away* 4 90"141019 14:1 ULM" ledesevies Cset**0"s 1411 aL!1OTa,1 Indies Appowa®aa*. 38sela4c 1414 OIL"" Caches 4 Ctapbier Tfadecis obit UL M" electrical 144ve33ial 4"46310e, xz 1411 "Iff Q "We"614 Beotirrtat*as 344 ,Moat and Tay*► 13cs9r1+ 1611, t1Lmn 111041ri4 t1*oaseaaat0'a eail 'taps 1414 1ILMOPQ sevisg 111"Movs 1414 al.'IM aartebeld Applisece9, MC 1441 *1 " ttecttle Lapp* 16411 staofa Cat 60sl-Cat llisgl Vif* 101114** 14sS 111011ata1 easideatias Alrcilic las%tint tletetse 1646 al!lOfO • Cowwrci*l, Udasttial. sae 'aaati3osie"I Litbtino 13440679 1641 aL'tbFO' iabicalot LiAl iaa 94isigrareat 1411 ISM" Badio a Television 3*cp3va42 last 101 aLMM" Fb000geap etserds and r10-11c244v4 sl4040314 7,200 1441 aLa1" B0di4 sod 1plevaaiaa lyaws®i:l3:i*g. 3aa403i4a. "•s arlectles 21wip"No Ned Agoaca3vs 1614 a1N" 11"ie**dvroeve and frlated Broads K/1 BUW9 tletttesic copsc slogs PM 0111,1000' f tlrcatanic C0832. Mlar1 peel✓*" still a11M/FQ tlactrtaic Coon rota. xC 1411 New stata0r eatleeira 141/ 11141 fyiaaty e*1101301, cyy sea 'eve 1/st *Note# wosacles and esamvwevf Cat dacha's 1114 114.10014111 ant** svbac le Foe I s a+ad +la crss®lira , 1114 aL.•M" ap1*r Ida"►+ Pit oww" Aisteols Aitcysll tolieve sea 1xvisas *,eft PA 1�:4 slow" MI ii Allstate ►seas a" A..aoaaaoy 7401para1' Of • *IC fbsf* typo* •eKf1o/1M spot N MI@4- Skip Maildiat sea sfpaivies stop a nm feat gnilaiy sed Ropeiviag sell at"" 4041600tiy. Ssi*alific. l9botstest as staterch laeHwa*�t* slip 11N111/1) Awfoulie Coastal* fat 11084146146 stalden/ial sad Caaeeteiaf geoisomwele sea Appliance• "is soon" ladwoltial loettafrald let floseatiog. gisplay. "a Come#*$ of precede Taria:let. sad "lased predates 1414• Iltllop toletisiag field oblate end Cowwilat Melees olio 111.110e0 laelroe»ass too M*ssorlog and Tootiss of llectrlder asd sleettic Silesia 1M sum" lleaselisg and cosftaitisg fovicao. KC sell KNM Oplical lesttnaeele sea Laoses 1161 RIMPQ fefsical sad "Cal $Ntrworets and Appovates 1841 11LOOM Otlbo"dic, hosibetic, end secgical Appliances ead Sapolita 1141 KNOM googol 946iprwt a" !toll•• loss 111)WO Ovhehabic saga* 31161 KJONp photographic twl/st 1 OW supplies sell Moons@ Yatebts. Clock$, Ole. loll II ~QT Jowalcy. precuts sliest 3014 NLNWQT silverware. posted rote. and Uolstese steel Vote Ms 1111.N1►Q Jeweler•• findings • Malati*$* A Lapidary wets H41 11J4LeMl`q Coolant Jeweler and Costs* Movellios. escape Ttacsess rifle$ lt4G OALMOre MovaW, piss. 0*46 and spa. and sialler notions I9111 111JsLM" Signs "a Ueettisieg •Isotope Ms uJILA /® serial Cedhat• sett 1101.10MI'v 110oewlectating lndestalss 4011-4439: UUMs MIATIAM Apr MLIC nlL/tots 4911 MIT Railroads. Lime -Rawl spevelisg 4111 LM Local *ad laborban Tr*aals 4611 MIT Switching 4 terminal g®tahllebwass Gilt love Local passenger 1rM*pet6e11aa. KC Gill Lew tonicobs 6111 List $atrocity sad Ideal Milway pad**eg*t TreefpeeteUM 4111 LWr Scheel setts 4111 T Msiateesece 4 service fulllties got Moist rNwlete tasseagee 41e6sFaetatien Gill ALMI Legal laar•ir& without Stares* 4111 ALfYT Tcaahing, learpe fecal 4114 Jstowl Lecft lercaias with 3tetag* 4111 Jarlt Tawhiwg Terminal facililive Alto Jstowl V.S. F06161:16orvice itshiclip I121614 mse, Mlyl 4►l1 T- Door Sea fnsvi4w asaftspetlaties bias t►t.ior Caoga Magdlies 4160.1 J11,1" Vale# Tf fwoteff el wwa Srralato. NEC III^ • �, ill 7!II'QVIwliUfi�I and, i' sic ae Cs'- welt two Mssrspolew I AM t t Aso Cvetiffes/ea Catvieve soul t superls a" 117isg fields 41e1 LfT Aiepest torwisel gftaicva 4611 JaLM Clear pogfeltwo Viso times 4611 JsIIIT sr/feed ►reaelreft Vtpv liars 4619 JslpT Pitt Liens. 7�gt 4411 tT lelvpboor Conaeufwssslan 11/ir* so Sodas) :A11 Lf media graadseseieg 4919 tr tolvoisise bfaedsastisg 14 4011 1 fifeteic Sesvisgs Me t sllrclfiees a sahra 30e14c*s 4911 T ies 4 01601 orfaiess 4019 T Combination Mij-3gios. NEC 40s1 T bewersgo Syseoms 4411 • tosets sisgfes 44st AM fseisaty fofsice9. ar Seel-s/ill: 1348.2 ?Moat "St T basso i ffesee MdtaaiaJa, vb*l@*a/* 110 On Cheaicals sea Ai,iied fQddefcls Molasses sill A , fans Seypl its 5111 ALt poises. Tdaeishos. a" so"J ifs 119t•30es: A9tlIL 3�ft+gt 1211 Jslf pains. class..sed sa 3pagt+e harts f;sl AKT rafdrafv ltaaot !1PI Jst1 slosile saw sealers less UJst atpartstee 3169as stet Host miscollsaeeas Sperms 749e'handise 340eoe sill Low rises# Ve%isie 1iv43613 i3of. a Seed) Sell LOW% ristaf 119hfcle 319Aioe' 11109vol 04I7) Sill LOW Aete 4 now Sapply 104423 154 Lfw c4selisr sefsatgr 3444aseq. Ir9si1 less tow sees Ilealefa Ss11 /'" ' @Iafatagc 10 bfetesa Me L1Yf Aafeaegif* f�f41ea4., AMC S►:J na.erheed Applisweo 34ares, Segall 1061 LI het...tie esetrlbeadising °laahfe. ftA9atere silt T Joel 4 Ica 3ee1et3 sell t two Mil 10e41010 , Sabi T Lisoalie9 trfaaleuat us seelvr' 47es•lse/� saae�aa3 11�eesas9t� 'ills LN ills "stated 10eedear4 .wd pie l'3oseiep 1M in Or) Clraoie* vlaees. 3aarv® Llesefeq Ills lee Ca.sos end PP641a8re7 11/A 111 144,.041441 144ee4e1i915 /a.1 p,.arwal S.aoffrf e4.e 3'2arM44Ari3s 10a1 t1 O��IJftT 00140ws 11!Is�a0igo4J 3.�.fasa OK MNn two Description SK tlsots types Otcteipttea ! ! Left pelt in Aa ettls/aa. Mac MII-Nall• og pill 1K pilots This Aavvsalsly lsrviese post LOT alwptist nw Nietvicepping sanices tell JaVt Nvaaw and Art 64134fide fill Lap comweeiel p esesweMc Apt. sod craphloo O611 ABC Ar6srsn, lsessicsl asp fee/•ehel UrAtes plat NO ai•iaimNles sod tatcr•inotles Mi•icee Mo Lvt aeacewsaecias taveseiesss. 'iclsa Mc. sea • 1160 M1 Clessies MA mksieaMewcv twt•icss to arellings atarsrch Oflasisalisae ad Oder Soil/ewts, MSC eNo senicea. apt 1"I LW Meaerett sea Development Laboratories tlos most pAetsliaisMas Lsbeestoclrs MI 01 Csssvrrial Tsstiwt Laboratories iMo fit• tatlasei"We Csarsias sor•i400 - ?Sit UVT vessesise tat Masaf ad Leatist. ollbest Dri•sn loll My lewd arsta$ smil Leasing. witfeot drivers 2 lSlt LOOP stiller trailer aM aacrestioset tabus• Metal ; fill Lys top sea lady aapeit pus. A+t~l•s 'r Ella ttlo tie• aviraealsl aN arpele :Weep, Automotive is)% Ltd voles "a. Aotemativs - fill LOW Ceaecel Automotive Saps/r 4•sas list MIT "genii" affair lases• M . 1611 Lp1 adto A television a•psll Sho" 1681 LVT lebistcetiss L apt c.esditiesiny e•nlc• • tepait licpe _ . > � dy:: flee Of electrical h electronic lrpie Map, etc fats LT Watch. Nec1e, and hnelop ltveir > fits JtLt 10040e1410tp s84 terallere aepair ^, late Lrtl welding Strait , p 14016, LT Arsa/ws erwinales snaps 1699 Lt attsit Shw and aelaaea services. on lJoe Iodine Tesi/aeslals/ y lilt Lot servicae Allies to locales victors vresectl.a poll ALI TAostrical viceaococe lescapt Natlen lletocasl nMea loiecallas•ees fleeotcical services toot AK public Coif Cootooc pool Ur Coin-Optcstta Aeseeevet fevicea t /oM ,Mitt Aa+somew! ►orke F, 1plo ' AK MA aecrostles svnlcss, etc Oaat Of cows#&$ Ntaical aN soclical Aesphal OKo Lv1 $Weisser 86*011616. *scope vorcMaeNe OecO Of Medical to►aacociss t . MI1 tat Dewtel LN.rse.eiAA loll LVT Oieateliese Cat@ facilities atlt•aD)1: ISOCAT1OnAL staplCtt k Opl1 JOL" tlemrwtsrT e" srce"Ort scbool• PLC •test alorAarr ntlNelf(si k - fill M111 Ce/soars, aMi•trsitica. hefoaalneasl estisols, - :: a" l•siat Cellos** atat !9"TV fecal4.wse Seboele, *scope Vccatiasel We% • School*. XKC ISM Pg." sob"Oe 'sof /locoliNst Senicee. KC sits Nt1T lab irsrwr*$ ood raroeiewei s.*•all,taelew :eteice• ` Not; a Ma,"act"** cissailon ATTACHMENT PRG�s�,a ,�`:�, Sqp , INTERIM TRANS RTAT I ON I NFI IVTS A. 1, SE 2nd ue s !rd Street Adjust Pose cv°b 00 Pub l is l and on southbound Wroesh and ad -just traffic signal heads as required, to create four verema present three southbound through lanes. Lena drop to be easily Nested south of Intersection within OxIsting'.pavement through left turn at Aiscayne flowlevard May prior to grickeli Avenue bridge roech. VQ4IfY :Ignlrg eno strlsing throughout section as raomired. SE 2hd Avenue and SE 2nd S+ree+ Adjust channalIzOlon curbing in southeast corner to' provide +so woOb®und +:trough lanes and three separate left turn lanes, plus one fro* flow let+ turn lane Inside tnooifled cnanneii:o+lon island. Two of the left turn lanes for access +o 1-95 entrence ATTACHMENT 5 r (Page 2 of 3) 3. Biscayne Plaza Project Entrance x M' r- y. r Entrance and exist drives to be coordinated with ultimate bifurcated ramp design and City of Miami Public Works Department. Geometric alterations at project drives near Biscayne Boulevard Way and Biscayne Boulevard Way. This is to include revised drainage as necessary, outside pavement widening within existing right of way, signalization of exit drive to be installed when warranted, (provided, however. that such signalization for the One DuPont Plaza exit shall allow for and be coordinated with the future signalization for the 100 Chopin Plaza building parking garage exit) and revised pavement markings. Also provide custom material and construction for approximately 11200 feet of sidewalks along project street frontage and riverwalk frontage, and all seating, lighting, and landscaping, all for public use. -4. Biscayne Boulevard Way Access Roadway { _. City to preserve present public right of way for ` separate 18' eastbound access roadway south of Biscayne Boulevard Way to extend from SE 3rd Avenue to Biscayne Plaza project south vehicular traffic entrance. Preservation to extend at least to date of completion of project Phase 2. (Separate access roadway not deemed necessary to project Phase I). A-22 Fft «; «. a. 7Y.L w b. Surround fn Area 1� � is (00+.SlAe Du n♦ pf aza) 1. Strom+ W sout-1 Mleen+l Avenue and SE 1 Avenue ; Cl+y Seeks r tmstel y five feet of @ddltlonal right of way wlthln tnls block +not Is necessary +0 ergot* three westlOL+d I fines. an add I? ion of one +revel Ian*. At tit* MOW Avenue Int'gr�eettOn, tAls Iwprovwg'n+ would @flow a Soper*+* left turn Ions. o sepere+s +hrougn IWO, and a separate Iwo used es a cmbino+lon through end slant right to the 1-95 e0ronce r4vnp. AT TACHM ENTO- S"MAt Or FLORSD'A RLht!-C9•fl or COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DSVISICN Of AtSOURCt PLARNUC AND rANAOIb:t::: SGRSAU OF JAND AQ RATER ftAVACV_%:X.s: ' 3571 Lsototiv0 Contot Citclo, taxt Tallahassee, +fltatAdA 22101-4244 Subsection 180.04(25), PICCida statutes, places the responsibility on the devolope$ of an aFproved development e: regional Impact (PRI) tot submAtting on annual report to the local government# the Regional Planning Council• the Depart«en: of Community Affairs, and to all affected perlAit agencies, or. t"a date specified An the Devolopr+ent Order. The failure of a developer to submit the report on the date apecAfied in the development order may result An the temporary suspension of t"o development order by the local government until the annual ropo:t !s submitted to the review agencies. This requitement applies to all developments of regional Aspect which have been approved since August i, 2180. It you Dave any questions about this ro aired report, call the ORI infotcament Cootdinator at, (ICc) 4S�•dl2S. Please send the original completed annual report ti-the designated local government official stated in the developee otdot with (1) copy to each of the followings a) The regional planning agency of juriadtetiont b) All affected permitting ageneioss ' c) Division of Resource Planning and Management Suteau of Land and hater Management 2S71 Eaac;itive Center Circle* Cast Tallahassee, flotida 32!".1 Please forest your Annual Status Report after the format example provided below. AR-1= STATUS RtPOAT Xeporting Period: to • Month/Day/Yeas Ko:.tt�/Da}/Year • Dsve:opaeAts Mega* of DAI Locations , City County Developers Nasal Company Name v es-aze 7yy i • u�+•o'•os • Pape Two l) Describe any changes made in the proposed plan o: dolls loptnent0 phasing, or in the iepresentatlons contained !d %he Application tog Development Approval since the heveloprerCC! Regional impact received approval* please note any acttans Isubstsntial detosainations) taken by local government to add ess• these changes. Note: It a response is to be more than one sentence, atts,h as tshibit "Ae a detailed desciption of eael% change and copies e2 the modified site plan drawings. Axhibi% °A• should also addle$* the following additional items if applicable. a) Describe changes in the plan of development at phatin; for the reporting year and for the subsequent years: b) State any known incremental DRa af®lications for develo pent approval or requests r a substantial deviation determination that tier• filed in the repoatzr; lost and to be filed during the next years a! Attach a copy of any notice of the adoption of a development order or the subsequent modification of an -- .• adopted development ogder that Was recorded by the _ developer pursuant to Subsection 380.06(141 (4); P.A. _) fee there been a change in local government jurisdiction for any portion of the development since the development order was issued? if so, has the annexing local government adopted a new Development of Regional Upact development order for the project? please provide a copy of the order adopted by the annesing local goveenasate 1) Provide copies of any revised vaster plans, incremental - site platet etc., not previously submitted. Mote: 29 a response is to be more than one or two sentences* attach as tsbibit •3.0 M) Provide a sumaagy comparison of development activity proposed cad actually conducted for the reporting year. :samples Number of dwellling snits constructed, site Improve meats* lots sold, acres mined, gross floor area constructed, barrels of storage capacity completed, permits obtained, etc. Notes 2f a response if to be more than one sentence, attach as lsbibit •Ce- s) lave any undeveloped tracts of land in the develor en: • (other than individual single -far lots) been sold to a separate entity or developer? It so, identify tract# its size, and the buyer. Please provide maps which show the tracts Involved. Tract "yet Mote: If a response is to be more than one sentence@ attach as inhibit •D.• i) Describe any lands purchased or optioned adlaeent to :`e original Development of Xegionai Upact site sutse;sen: to issuance of the development order. Identify such land, its s::eo and intended use on a site plan and cap.. Mates 21 a response is to be more than one sentence, attach as sshibiL •t.a . A•25 r I l" (720 r. m� i •LMM•07•!f Page Shtoo 71 List any -substantial local, state, snd which have been obtained, ap iiei ter. ar Aenifdffdfral .;.a repetting period. Specify t o alfncx. type of • Our ingthaa� tot facb. rt• And dws�: Note: it a iabibit ®y,®teaponse is to be acre than one sentence, sttACh as !) Ae8009 the development•m and local lovernmenr.® tinuin' compliance vith.any conditrena of approval aet•a the DAi ilevelepsent order. ntAicoan in Not*$ Attach as zxhibit ®d.® `doe attached farm) !) provide any intersation that is spacitieally re4oi:ad by the Dovelopafnt ®rdfr to be included to the annual repeat. 201 Provide a al,O.®_®® p ,v t t f ATTACHMENT 7 DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE TO THE DOWNTOWN DISTRIBUTOR BIFURCATED RAMPS (As Discussed by the Dupont Plaza Task Force) s: f) �'. 1. A/Ottlswsl stPueh�re 4909 s 38• ._ , 2. Iletelning wN 1 se 140 (330' • l00•1 s 38• 3. lneeewident ratelning wall structure far aonnaeter to SE !re Ave. x 2001 a 211 s 401 lncrowif ' 46 qa osnstruetlen of seal♦lens+ Inns an X are St. between "SE be Ave. ON K 3re Ave. �': 3!0 • s 1=' /� reea+s+r uef 10n 390• e 2 curb end gutter g. Traffic signals sf SE are Ave./lleoerne •Iva. Mar' end of Seutna"t ' flnM+elsl Cee+er gersle 1. A"Wenel features end widening SE 3rd Ave: baftw llsesr+e live. wet am X are St. 3204 s 331/9 (Intl. ralsed +Pottle se 01`1on) A. •single side construction edjacw tm one" Plate Wtel • 490• 1. vwe carolew signing* signalItation, ane earhings C. "we eawelaw e0100snee of +raffle 50111Cts AM . f,. V7777— .. €� r: ! EXHIBIT "C" , Attached to and rude a part of Resolution 86*828; 1986 f , :-DEVELOPMENT :OF -REGIONAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT { r f FOR M I AM I CENTER I ` iq- , Located In Miami ` r r t 23.07 <. ., A SOUTH FLORIOA REGIONAL PLANNING CCO CIL February, 1996 _. a south florida r¢gional planning council .? 34.4-C ^Ciryv4= �.NC. SujtS 1 C ICIJ�.W C °WCC 33C2! `dCwCtC '30: OC' •ACC: February 4, 1986 The Honorable Xavier Suarez Mayor, City of Miami 3S00 Pan American Drive Miami, Florida 33133 + Dear Mayor Suarez. M The South Florida Regional Planning Council has officially adopted the enclosed Regional Impact report for the Miami Center I Amended ADA and forwarded copies to the Florida Dsperften+" of Cana" i+y'-_ Af fairs, anc +tie Sou+!+ FloridaMaier Menagwent Di sir let. This report Is provided for your us* in reviewing the Development of Regional Impact pursuant to' Section 380.06, Florida Statutes. While.+he s+aff of the Council is available +o assist in the resolu+ion of any matter regarding the report, +he Counc i I has no I @gal - mechan i sm "rough which it can act on +his report again, except through appeal -procedures. Recent changes.+o Sec+ion 380.06. Florida S+o+u+es, and Rule 9J-2.25• i Florida Adminis+rs+ive Code, are now effective ana require changes +c ana set criteria for local gm*rrm*n+ Development Orders. For exanpie, 380.0605)6(e), 1:.S., now requires that: "local governments shall not approve a developmen+ of regional ` impact the+ does not make adequate provision for public facilities needed +o accommooa+e +he impacts of the proposed Gevelopmen+, } unless +he local government includes In +h@ development order a commitment by the local government to provide these facie hies consistent with development schedule approved in the development i order... ,. Please review Council recomendations, Sec+Ion 380.06, F.S.(19S5), and Rule 9J-2.25, F.A.C., carefulty prior +o issuance of +he Miami Cen+er I Amended Development Order. ' Copies of any aevelopm@n+ order issued with regard +o +his project must be +rensmi++ea +o +he South Florida Regional Planning Council ana the { Florida Depar+m@n+ of Cownmuni+y Affairs, which have e5 Gays +hereefter ft make an appeal decision based on whe+her +he County$: development order ; is consistent with +he Council's report and recommends+ions and o+her i requiromonts of +he law. { The M6norab i e Xavier Suarez Page 2 February 4. 1986 r 1f we can be of further assistance, please cell. S i ncere I y, Ana, Deister Interim Executive Director AD/Mk Enclosure cc: Sergio Rodrigues John lefley Ethan Minksy, Esq. Lin.RaMlinson, Roy Kenzie Ted Gould David C. Rhtnsrd Paul Soper, Jr: RusselI Mirth.•Jr.. Jeff Bercow, Esq. Mynol le Ml i son Me#Ier Gorson;' EsQ:' John Salley Ray.-Fernaia Morb Zebuth Susan Coughonour - Charles Knight Thomas Thomson George 'Firestone • t Y � _',h� Ar 5 f�� X� t ti a .. .. "Al TABLE OF CCWTENTS P.c! LIST OF FIGURES....................................................... i LIST OF TABLES........................................................ :J LIST OF EXHIBITS...................................................... iii INTRODUCTION.......................................................... ; PART 1. -PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................ - f A. APPLICANT INFORMATION .................................. 4 e. PROJECT INFORMATION r .................................... PART 11. PROJECT IMPACTS AND ISSUES .......................:......... 1: f, A. ENVIRONMENT AM NATURAL RESOURCES ...................... 1' 4 e. ECONOMY ................................................ C. PUBLIC FACILITIES ...................................... 2O s - 0. TRANSPORTATION 23 ......................................... PART I11. COMMENTS FROM -OTHER AGENCIES ............................... 3! • PART IV. SUiANARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................ 74 ,F L Y .. k LIST OF F 1 GURES _ :,a Figure No. Title .� Pa • t Location Map ............:................................ 2 Master Development Plan .................................. 3 Biscayne Plata South Elevation ........................... s. Traffic Impact Area 29 -. ...................................... x S Proposed Modifications to the Downtown Distributor ry Blfurcated Romp System ................................... 38. Current FDOT-Design for the Downtown Ois+ributor .' 81furc0eo Ramp System ................................... ::: } 7. Existing Oown+own People Mover Station ................... 4=3, •.M r LN r„ 2 3 .7 9 10 11 12 13 14 is 16 17 Is 19 20 21 22 Prewious,Dovtlopment Plans Proposed Development ama Phasing Environmental Issues 12 Construction Costs is Permanent Employment Impacts (Alternate 1) 17 Permanent Employment Impacts (Alternate 2) Permanent Employment by Sector (Alternate 1) 19 Permanent Employment by Sector (Alternate 2) 19 Fiscal Impact (Alternate 1)*00000000000,0000eo*09000000000 21, Fiscal Impact (Alternate 2) 2,2 Water, Wastewater, and Solid Waste 21- Existing Traffic Conditions 27 Programmed Transportation Improvements 30 Major Committed Developments ............................. 31 Trip Generation Rates 32 Cumulative Transportation Impacts .3 Cumulative 1994 Peak Hour Traffic AM 34 Cumulative 1994 Peak Hour Traffic - ISM •ftdiflco+fons to the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Romps - Dupont Plaza Task Force 37 1994 Levels of Service wI+.4 Project Traffic and Improvements ........... 3110 Additional Improvements +a the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Romp System ............... AO Critical Intersections Without Bifurcated Ramp System LIST OF EX41131 T5 Exhibi+' No. Tltie pace 1 Code for Nast* Types Coww 1y Assoc1atao rl+h Each SIC Incustry........_.............................. 93 2 LiS+ of Potential Hazardous Waste Generators by SICCoco ............................................... %r,�: 3 Recomended Plant Species .............................. 99 A Proposed Interlm Transportation Improvements ........... ��_ Master Development Plan ................................ t�6 Annual Status Report ........... ........................ t.Z: r 1il , w 1" jig_�i.#,aa,.GAaz.:�.F�r_..tneb.bZ,... ,. Zv___-.. �.. .-.'.:.� .3 -' a....e.::..u.....^ua,.''3`SAY...i-:.�.i!?.�...Ya_„•..c.....5'":k ', m0. _..:%ii�;,r _ and the City. Council staff strongly urged the %-pout Plaza area CRI developers to cooperate in ,jointly developing a final transportation improvement plan which would 1) provide acceptable levels of service in Dupont Plaza at full buildout, and 2) be compatible with public plans for the 1-95 bifurcated ramp extension and the Downtown People Mover system in Dupont Plate. The Appilca+ts agreed to cooperate wlth each Other and wi!h a task force of City, County, and State staff to develop an ultimate roadwey and.trsnsit system to support the three aevelopnents. As work began on the aevelopnent of a final transportation solution for full buiidout of Dupont Plaza, Molywell Corporation was ready to obtain rt Its building permlts for 'the now existing portion of Miami Center 1. 1't seemed prudent and certainly cost-effective t0 wait to determine wnat interim improvements should be required for Miami Canter I until the final transportation•#olution was developed. Therefore, on September 25, 1980, the City of Miami Commission approved an amendment to ttie Miami ,F Center I Oevel opmen+ Order, which postponed the requ l redeem for interim improvomants•from prior to building permlts to prior to issuing certificates of occupancy. Since 1980, the SOU+4ewSt Dank Financial Center has been constructed In C'upont Plaza; however, +he Miami Center 11 project was never started was z.; r PART 1 • PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. APPL I CANT I NFCRMAT I ON Project Name: Miami Center Applicant: Holywell Corporation, as Agent for Miami Center Joint venture and Chapin Associates 300 Miami Center J 100 Chopin Plaza Miami, Florida 33131 Oite of Acceptance of Application: December S, 1965 Date -of Receipt of Local Public Hearing Notice: January 6, 1986 Deadline for Council Action: February 24, 1966 Oat* of Loco I Pub I is Hear t ng : February 27, 1966 ` Type of 0evelopment: Office/Hotel Locifion of Orvelopnent: City of Miami - 0 PRO JECT DE SCR i PT I ON The 6.3 acre Miami Center 1 (Bail Point) site is located in.aowntown Miami between Biscayne Boulevard and Biscayne Say. and between, Sayfront Park/Chopin Plaza and the entrance to the Miami River (Figure 1). An Application for Development Approval (ADA) for this s i to was ipproved by the Counc i I In lay, . 1979 when the project. known as Bail Point, included an office tower, a hotel towtr, and two intum towers built over a podium/parking struc+ure (Table 1). The size of the project was modified slightly by the City of s Miami's Development Order and partially completed as snown in Table 1. G: x �;� , { 5 The @iscayne Plase project will consist of Phrse 1: a 39-story ers+ tower rtop a 10-story ground pociun with parking, office, and retail uses, and Phase 2: a 51-floor west tower which will be built upon the podium constructed in Phase 1 (Table 2). The Applicant is proposing 60 executive apartments (120,000 square feet), 160,000 square feet of retail/commercial space, 700,000 square feet of office space, and 1,200 parking spaces. The commercial space Includes a small (10,000 square feet) restaurant/cabaret in the gerden park on the 11th (top) floor of the pooiun. The park will include an artificial skating rink/dance floor. Phase 2 will 4;. - Include 90 executive apartment units 0 W,000 square feet); 60,000 square feet of retail space, and 780,000 square feet of office .ri. space. If marks+ conditions are not favorable for the 110 dwelling units proposed In Phases 1 and 2, the 300,000 square feet will be Converted to office space. 7Mtl 2 1111"INQUO O1110[LORAN7 AIO RwSI14 O��Ip• t�awclol Total shall$ CiaatM ?"IWO 434 units 115.!°i7 0 1l10 Ina �a1N111� bi0.OD0 S.R. sail" ►la" 700.000 0 I`0.0O0 b0 llutl,s 1*7 1011* rasa I It0.000 S.R. (lost. VNIUl) a' /1 sat1!1�a /wits .700.120 O :blfs INp IMF '' • II too aa►ha• Is W"t"Witlo OW emstructlon at "A ISO ►oslsoMlal units. tin Awe Ica" •i t 1 onstetal "to 900.000 sfisto loot as o►• Ica liMs. SOLIPIX: Am . =t ' .lbw JrMf➢ti� 34Y4:�t.?n"�31.t3Y_!Yt'{R34N.}'F.4--iz'niTfiTa"yt�'. "'-may _ ni. ..:a•R°L^f.P-"xR'..mA``lFe*.:..C.§!^.C'_ .^a? ,. .._2. . S'£'.i="r_ .-:T s .!'t•taa .sGt t4 F _ 7777A �- e•:' t. ;g ''. PART 11 • PROJECT IMPACTS AND ISSUES E• A. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Summary I Table 3 summarizes the impacts of the project on the environment. Several issues are described below in more i detail. Air j Applicant estimates of one- and eight -hour carbon monoxide (CC) ..: concentrations were made using computer modeling. The highest predicted eight -hour CO concentration of 7.4 (82 percent of State Standard) occurs in 1991. If project traffic is k. subtracted from the analysis, the predicted eight -hour 1991 concentration drops to 3.7 ppm (41 percent of State standard). ' -Dade County maintains a•permanent CC monitoring site at 101 wt East Flegler Street, which has recorded many exceadances of CO standards over the last few years. Continued exceedances could f• :result in the designation of the South Florida airshoo as a non -attainment area for CO by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. South Florida is already a non -attainment area for ozone, although few exceeaances of ozone stewards have.bean •: recorded since 1982.= F r F' lob •(( q, i= 1 x i { Although the CC concentrations edjecent tp the Miami Center 1 project (in @ayfran+ Park) are not projecteo to exceed standards, project traffic alone contributes 3.7 ppm (41 percen4 of State standard) to the eignt hour CC concentration. The Applicant should incorporate the transportation and air Quality impact reduction strategies listed in Condition 1 into project assign and/or operation. 3, Mazer, nrainege•, and Hazardous materials Soil borings done by the Applicant in 1979 showed tnat grounewater beneath the site is approximately S feet below existing• grade. Groundwater beneath the site is saline and should not be used for human consumption or irrigation. Tyere are no surfece water bodies on -site. Biscayne Say, a State Aquatic Preserve and OuWanoing Florida Maier, is locateo. immediately east of tee project site. According to the Applicant, the drainage system for +no ,* existing portion of Miami Center directs stormwater to a perimeter exfiltration system trench. Runoff that exceeds the capacity of the trench system flows into attention tanks and :then to drainage wells, which discharge runoff to tree stline as ifer. The system is capable of handling the 23-year storm. ;The Proposed Miami Center drainage system will be QeSignho to handle a 25-year storm in twsama manner Qescribed ejove. Only riff in excess of +me 23-year Design storm will ioeve the ,site. was4ing down tote paved surfaces and t-ten routing the wasncown water, which contain a greater amount of, ano more highly concentrated, pollutants than runoff from other on -site impervious surfaces, totrough oil and grease interceptors in•o a sanitary sewer. This was4down program will not allow aischar;e of polluted washaown water to tote Biscayne Aquifer. During construction of the remainder of Miami Center 1, the Applicant should piece rip -rap, temporary berms, or other barriers along +no porim Oor of the site to prevent -discharge of construction -related runoff to tote Eey. Ing. design and construction of the project should also include perm anent berms or barriers, et Ieost one foot above grade, so +net direct discharge to the Say does not occur after the project is template. Another source of water pollution, potentially even more 4armful t4an stormwater runoff, is 4azaraous waste. Hazaraous rest@ Is dlfinea by the U.S. Enviroewmental Protection 4gency end tote State as waste that is ignitable, corrosive, reac•ive, or toxic . Exhlbtt Is included at the end of this CRI Assessment, is a list of Standard Industrial Classification (SiC) cones for fec i 1 it ies +no+ have bin found to provide one or more of the hazarcous wastes l i stea in Exn i b i t 2. Those lists art excerpted from tote Florida water Quality Assurance Ac+ P 14 {a _ ti= regulations, and all facilities that fall within ♦nose SIC codes are re0u i red by the Act to provide- informat ion regarding types and amounts of wastes generated at the facility ono how this waste Is being managed. II is likely that potential smell quantity hazardous waste generators will be occupants of Miami Cen*er 1. The Applicant has proposed to cover loading areas to exclude rainwater. Implementation of the additlonal measures listen in Condition 3 will further reduce the possibility of adverse impact on regional rater ouality. S. EC@PI Y 1. Projec+ Costs Table s summarizes.project costs ..incluoing.constPuc+ion . employment and wages. Tau e •. COtilf{tT10M =T3 (■ I.M411 Wait llsa60rM ►(esw !►seew files/ ! 1w _ d1K t�Z Coo [® N1�sf= aM 2 U*of ie11 - �0.90!' V.= e1."0 t00 L4W et.x+0 9e1610 S0. ma 107.r00 [0 ';; ' ■r*or 1 e I s 6S. 0',!N '�. !SO if. S!0 � 00.2ifC Tj /aMi/e11� 11 �� 1'r1M (�1* a{i10®1 e1s* o was11n1wtr•r _jam � TOTAL» t 20. fop t 10. S6a tlD. r� i l ®. 200 Te*e1 "eject hew - Censtp""Iss iase(®IwW1** $ib a1a%eloy 6s �r vaiaer fW vows u. Ot S +tales orrtlo vows ) • ;ir r.Mawrrli*1a ass +OT.O 61111ow 1$22.16s pier asps►Owo oeor Wr (M401 r.Aw*or l.;s•-l. W.211 per oftlews raw W► I1,16ge"O mama. fte" 1, so StLM oar 601 flier (o1' If sderile ei eso. elope i 1ll0e ceilits. lts(aslaMj tw*orre+ cep*t►. %OkMCI: AOA " q.n _ - z, la - 2. Permanent Jnoloyment TOW permanent project employment is ostimatod to be 12,144 for Alternate 1, which includes 150 residential units (300,000 _ square feet), and 13,537 for Alternate 2, wnicn includes 300,000 additional square feet of office space and residential units. Because a majority Of firms locating in new Offices move from other office buildings In the Region, only about 23 percont Of tno jobs can be considered new to the Region.. For Alternate 1, assuming 2,497 now projoct employees, the Council es+imatos that new project amploy+mont, by its indirect and induced offects, could generate up to 5,"2 now jobs in +me Roglon, with 1,637, 3,716, and 69 In Braved, Deco, and Monroe, respectively. This employment corresponds to S108.S million in ' - total wages and $184.1 million in value added to the regional - economy .(Tab I o 3). Alternate 2, assuming 2,782 new project employees, could onerato up to 6,100 now jobs In tno Region, with 1,837, 4,165, and 78 in Broward, Deco, and Ionro#, respectively. This eimploym+ont corresponds to S121.5 million In total wages and S207.6 mi I i ion In value added to the regional economy ( Tab I e .Table 7 shows the sectoral distribution Of pormanont ",ployment, for"Alternate 1 and Table O- shows the distribuf ion fqr_' Alternate 2. 16 A. EMtLnr+Ii1/T , �tOtIM0 AG#IG'1TUK. tO11ESt11r. tISMIN¢ 0. ' AVIC%TU/tAL SERVICES 3. MINING t. CONVICTION 74. 11AKWACTLR I NG 73. MANS PONUT 1 ON AIp UT I L I T I I S 49. 1ICLESALE ?*AM 21. META IL UACE 300. FINANCI. INS. AM REAL WATT 479. 1PVICts 6%. W %"N qw 0. TOTAL 1437. ,. TOTAL VAGES tim $1 �AGRICLLTUK. tO1KST+tr. tlSMtllQ to.� AVICILLTMAL SERVICES d9. MINING 10. CO ls"IXT10N 1724. 111WACTUR ING 1272. VIANSPORTATION NO UTILITIES *31. VHUSALI "MCC 614. MAIL TRAM 3471. IIIIANX. INR. Alp REAL ESTATE w32. 1►'rt 1>:99. trQlI WTAL 32330. C. %ULIR 01 OIT*UT ( I WO S ) $0. INA. PALO CAN 0000E REGION BEACH 0. 0. 0. 0. Ice 40 t. 0. 2. 0. Its. 3. tog. 41. 111. 1. si1. i2. 227. 2. 274. 21. It3. 1. f12. 14. 471. 11. 7010 131. NO. 12. 14". 223. Iwo. 31. Me 343. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3714. M. 9442. U7. 69. 0. M. 112. _ - 76. 17. 131. 90. 23. 2. 34. 11. sa91. �. •rn. 072. 4012. 20. $384. 8". $732. 42. 7149. Mt, 207. 30. 3000. 367. 9O63. 268. 8713. 1749. 22974. W. 32148. 9213. 30191. 010. 43219. 7492. tads. 29. 1929. W. 7" 10. 1770. 104929. 17894. 00ICLLTME. ormts7ltr. ►ISHINO 92. 30% 001CUL"J" SERVICES . 131. 2". -' 11iM11q Si. • 7ii2. 11�1/3.0. �y���/t1C�T�t�•ly. .w.�/► r'Y �/f {..Y 7M. 29701 . W"OOITATION Alp UTILITIES 402. 17dq. 1I10LISALE MO[ 1297. do". RAIL 11RAR 7M 3. 11997. L R1110a,, Ildo AI® REAL ISTAW 43419. "672. wwasWAL 100703. 234321. .'. Q. 101JR. AMID (INN S) ';. AORICULTMe, t0RtS"1r, FISHING dO. 193. AftIC6LrW" KltViCEt 79. Isi. �' 1: MtNiN0 23. 92. C0 d"iICT1On loll, 2723. '" MAIytAGTU� I Nib 29". 9643. Rt►t+SORTRT I Ori AIII IT I L I T I E S 27t7. 11 w7. 00ASAJI UAW i93. 33i6. RSA I L T1t1 4090. 3:01. ' I oloo. E. INS. Aw REAL tSYATE 214". 49313. {, SEt'1►ICtS iit27. 411I1. w�NIwE9rIT 4107. 1180. �$I:M>I�! ii�t �81 dilif riliA►Ni�. t vvpC h 17 �`ialaE:1^"..�-- _t[v4ffiSLYdit. F •._....._.'.1:..-St1..':.' _ __ - .t. L 40. 3w. t49. Is. 128. N. 429. 10379. 4401. 129. 333119. 9916. 249. 11" r . 1 M. G0. 026. 73% 9M. 200". 4003. 1.w. 143512. 230oi . 30. 20oA. 34�. Mitt . 33w12. 96332. 0. 14►1. 493. 21. 229. 13. 109. 4742. 1077. 47. 126". 2070. 171. 14099. *42. 99. 42t4, Sic. 210. SO2d1. swi• 747. i1717. 11940. �; 1273. $32%. 10f21. 29. 1703. 2". 2749. 1141A0. 2M. - r••• 2.xM.+CeW+kg'i!Il:tAS,�Er....? E ti Jll TAKE 6 ' RIMANW aTOLOt'14W IMPACTS IAA?EldATI 21 it f0. rLA. PALM otAAAO OA1x a01111f Pld10N KACM AAICL6,TVK. salfslllr. tt9Mlte0 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. A0111C1A,TUMI. SPVICQS 6. 6. 1. 1t, 4. rIMIRJQ 1. 1. O• 2. 0. COt�STNtt:T10N M. 134. 4. a1. N. MAIAit �CTt�11 M8 61. 207, 1. I11414 1RTATION A/0 VILIT113 90. 292. 143 tt4t+LS SALR "AM 32. In. 1 • • 160 I VA IL "AO! 332. $26. 20. 070. 179. F IIMIQ• 1e4. AM ORAL !STAIR $38. 11100 13. 1"1 • 293. SPvICIS 736, 17M• 39. 29N. 3M4. 0. 70TA16 10971 4163• 78. 61M. •71. 1. MAL VANS It= $1 'Aa�1e:,a�r. evllr+�•. rlsl�lls a.' ri.' o.' s..• rs.' +�' AMIMLYWAL MVICKS '!t• a. 10. 19s. 96. MIN11M / 1. 26. 2• 39. 20 " ' �pNSflert'T101r 1A6. V". too. 41". It"* s' ' , MIi1rAt:TiA ii� 130. 4412. 22. M i . OM. y� 1RA16fMOATION AIM 11TILIT111 1N7f. A69. 11. Md.712. VMSSALt "Am l06. 27". 49. 3941. 420. RTA14 111AtR 36ti0. 9602. 274. Oni. IAl. e i1NA16;Z• Illf• 40 MAL 11SU R 11241. 23940. 3/7. 37177. U"ICIS IAMO, 3411M. 1013. 90406. 11300. 90l. it72. 21. 1710. 2". r : TtRA< MI 1. 033". 1910.• 121549. IN95. f G MMR Or O MAN 11000 11 ;t e t A6>f1C1ieTIfK. r81RStt1r• rISMIOG 102. 343• o. 449• toil. t A6 il"TW►L lRYICRS IN• 346. 93. 441, 162. 5 MINIIIQ' 42. N. 12670. 7• IMe 149. 21:10440 79. s006• ` = �IfIIItL'T1011 ON. �z gMb�/1I�I{/t11Mi 6662. 27t2l. !39• 367N. sM4. <;r `t 311AI rORTAT10N A!e 1dfiLITIt3 4922. tft". 2". 24263. 21tt. � 11MWSALE "Am I442. 9724. 92. 7m. 661. KTAIL VJM 9M. 1203• 628. =42. 4426. oom I".' Ate wen WAIT IMO6• 113200. 1719• 166T21 • 2M60.. IVRYICRS 30467. 0000. MU. 102694. 16047. i M1RM1iee1T M!, 1416. 36. 23N. 3M• ?OTAL 113M• 2i40106 94". M116. "A". . •Ib L VA" 0=0 I1000 fi.. �AVICUL11m, } rams"ro rls"1114 st•• 170.E 0.� 221.E 909.E 4M1CULTMAL 9RIIYICIS M. 141• 31. 296. 63• '. 29. 4. 61Y. - 46. 1I�TIOII 2170. 3106. 120. s404. 1?27. IriIAItAt`T�IIiO 32s6. 1t;14I6. 91. 13741. 2144. VA401004110d AM WILITI6S 3102. 13M. 1". 1"0. t4,6• INOLfSALt TIiA M1. 3M1+e• 43. AM. s66• x ETA IL *AN 4476. 612110. 320. 11329. 2299. riama. IAb. Am re" fEsun 24167. s6744. Ow. M2111• 1327M. M"3. 6M1IS. 1410. 701T. 11623. �� 99°r• t3$1. 26r 11iO6. W MAL ""1. 1431106. y1167. M7654. D"s. Wr+Irs iliylrlllors a" � ftM61 0;ft • rirs. S10t f�A'l: s 3. Fiscal Iteoact 45 Using 1984 millage rates and historic average expenditures, _?>' Alternates 1 and 2 would have a positive fiscal Impact of $3.2 million on toe City of Miami, S2.3 million for 08oe County, S2.4 million for the school district, anc SO.2 million for +ns War Management Olstrict and special districts combined, for a positive regional impact of S8.1 million (Tables 9 and 10)., s, C. `!PUBLIC FACILITIES s' 1. water. wastewater• 'and Sol id waste Table 11 summarizes ttie project's Impact on waters wastewater,= and solld waste. TAOIj 11 MATpl, MASTEIIATER, AND WLIp MASTS Aveltote Qwwl:#Y As11e Fee Itits Avereoe POO REMb m spyr� es i i Ve er 415, wo WO to 0374 WO wo Yes t/ASA ' 1leeteeeter e1 S.000 OAO 1, 037, WO tiMO Yet • NASA Sol to ww*o 42 TM Or Yes • drive s x.: 149 cuble Yore$ per a" WO - gallons pe► GeV• _ TAO - "as per a" F' • Te1e 1. O"W4 ,t;' SOtACEi ApA _ ;� s 20 } I IAWE 9 i-- FISCAL IMMII /A1110011 11 s. arm IF OEVE10now Migtl CENTER 1 WNWD N/REBID. me TANESb LOCATION - �*'- CITY MIAMI r €I#tiilT r SAME ' WIECIAIL DISTRICT WNPO/LID SCOMM L DISTRICT IIAl1E P TYPE OF WWLOFTENT HIRED T11F'E OF DWELLING UNIT iiNiiLE-FAMIILII /SLTI-FAIMILI/ lODILE-NOTE TOTAL NUM ER OF UNITS ISO 0 O ISO NE PWA OF SILEENTS PER UNIT 0.00 0.00 0.00 - MEIIiDER OF PERSOt s PER !MIT 2.00 0.00 0.00 . TOIAL $HOER OF STUDENTS 0. + N o RESIDENT POPOE./lTION 3M. !i "Wet OF Etl owirB 12100. PRfIPERTY VALUE 392734336, ANA VSIS CONDUCTED USINS RVERA6E COEFFICIENTS a: CIT11 COUNT11 91ECIAIL DISTRICT SCHOOL DISTRICT TOTAL ONE-TIME REVEMIES • 637906. • 0. • 3051••. • O. • 943090. f ( TOIAL MEN AMOUR tv#VNB111SifS • 23Tp•10. • 2441251. • 336027. • O. • so341 ". ; 10TAL WW Al GI M " fWvr/8ES • 3331700. • 4695612. • 50369:. • 2 :90711. • 1 11i15716. is +• ..,.: - K 1 SIX.i's im, Q IS I W$ I R • 3: $17". • ?: 30!61. • 2iN: AS. • F :9.111. • fM�•le: b. . ,,-. ....._„..... , ... .. x ti .yam, a..,.,�:a•-�-, '.. - _ _ _ r �1 TAM 10 f 1SCAt IMPACT /At 110mil ?I NME OF WVEIINVIENT NIMI CENTER I ANENKO N/OFFICE AND TAXESM "fi .. t111.Ai CON I:I TV NIA111 -: CUpNTV SAME .. $1EC/AL DISTRICT SFWWIL ID S0*K1. DISTRICT SAME TVPE OF SEVELOPeENT N1NAESISENTIAt. J -, TVPE OF DWELLING UNIT GINGLE-FANILT MMI-FN11LV mome-mm TOTAL' WMISER OF UNITS 0 0 0 O N NWR OF SIUKNTS PER UNIT 0.00 0.00 0.00 PARWR OF rfoo 1Ns PER twit 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL NUMBER OF STUDENTS 0. :. RESIMENT POPIKAT 100 O. NtIMISER OF 1ElM'LES 121/4. FOOMMY VOLUME 362734336. ANALYSIS CONDUCTED USINb AVERAGE CI3£FFICIENTO CITY COUNTII SPECIAL DISTRICT SC OO. DISTRICT TOTAL ONE -TINE REVENES • A3r4A. 0 0. 0 30SI44. 0 A. 0 9E3090. _ TOTAL NEW ANIICML, EsffNDITIK+ES 0 225491:. 0 2379027. 0 Its"$. It 0 49416;642. TRIA1 ww MORAI KV011116 0 5492:32. 6 450423:. 0 52 "Me. 0 :194711. • 13M60036. Ii T gm#1 w. M De M ac T M i t::73:n. a ?M44613. 0 7161179. 0 2 %94711. • 11808016. Ps City of Miami Fire Department will provide fir* service to the project from Station 01 on W 5+h Street, with a response time of under four minutes. The station Is eouiped with two engine companies, one aeriel company, and one rescue company, and an On -duty staff of 18 persons. City of Miami Fire Department is also available for emergency medical service. Randle Eastern Ambulance Service will' provide emergency medical service to Miami linter I as part of +meIr contract with the City of Miami. Response times for down+ovin Miami currently average 8 to 10 minutes. The city Is presently developing an Impact too ordimace to be Imposed at building permit issurence, calculated based upon costs of necessary additional facIlI+es needed to support • additional development in excess of that planned fort proportionate to excess development. The fire department has inaicatea that this project.may be subject to +tie fee. 3. En�Y The Applicant proposes to use electricity as the primary fuel source• supported by a diesel fuel operated emergency generator. The total energy consumption a+ project bullaout is estimated to be 336.4 billion BTU's, or 98.6 million kilowatt hours. This is oquivalen+ to the energy content of 2.2 million gallons of fuel oil. Since this is electrical energy, three +Imes this amcun+ of energy (6.7 million gallons of fuel oft) roust be consumed at the power plen+ to provide this energy to the site. %Cause marginal costs are higher than average costs and ♦40 marginal costs for new tecillties are higher than +he average costs of existing facilities• the cost of providing additional oloctricl+y to regional users will be significantly higher +han the typical costs today. However, the new customers +tia+ need added generation capaci+y do no+ pay the true marginal costs for the added capacity. Indeed, the average cost to all consumers increases to cover the marginai cost of serving now customers. 7 I All electricity users In +m* Region subsidize the costs of now Or expanded electrical facilities and the marginal costs Incurred by the u+111+y due to now consumers or Increasea use by existing consumers. Thus, it is in the interest of all electricity users in the Region to reduce +me energy consumption and Increase the energy efficiency of users in +ate Region as a way ft Ward the Increase in average energy cos+s. Ore way +41 s can be done Is to require all now con0rueflon, largo or well, +0 mft+ adequate energy efficiency 0anearas. 11he inclusion of +me energy conservation measures listed in Conti it ion 11 will reduce the proj*c+ls energy use ona assls+ in avoiding adverse regional energy Impact. 0. TRANSPORTATION ln+roduc+lon In previously reviewed applIceflons for development approval in the Dupont Plaza area (Ball Point, Miami World Trade linter (C*nTrus+) . Sou+4o"+ Bank Financial linter, and +me now expirea Miami* Center 11). transportation assumptions depended on a three point sys+*m consisting of: 1) +he Downtown People Mover System, 2) an improves Woe+ surface system, and 3) the Downtown Cfs+ribu+or Bifurcated romp sys+em to access As was men+ion*d in +4@s* previous reviews, the Success Of +he downtown +r@nspor+&+I*n syS+QM (as well a$the ultimate viability of any developments In the DUW+ Plaza 25 `s 16 area) depends on al l three points of the system being operelanal prior to full buildout of the area. Prior to July 1962, in the absence of an adopted fair share transportation policy +hat could effectively analyze and address an Applicant's impacts on these i improvements, Council requested that developers in the Oupont Plaza area arrange "front-end" loans for the bifurcated ramp system in order to assist in timely development of needed infrastructure. As buiidout of this area Is fast approaching, it seems not only prudent but necessary to mention these needed facilities again. Two parts of the three part system are presently on-line• or are` y coming on-line In the near future, those being a version of the Downtown People hover System and major surface street improvements. The thiro leg of tois system. the Downtown 0lstributor gifurcafed Ramp system, still remains in the planning stages. As has also been noted in previous Application for Development ' Approval reviews. fhe Bali Point development was reviewed during +me f. long process to assess and plan for the future Transportation system in the Dupont Plaza area. As a result of this Timing problem and In an effort to assist in The timely development of the Poll Point Ps property, IT was agreed that the transportation impects generated by Ball Point would be addressed in the Miami Center II application, p.' p iThese lm acts were addressed in the submitted Miami Center 11 u appl ices ion and also in the issued Mi arm i Center 11 Development } 26 - - Order. As +me Miami Center 11 00 mes now expired, and the current Miami Canter project will create many of +me impacts of +me expired appliceflon, the impacts of +me Miami Canter I development mave been addressed in this review. 11.Existing Traffic Tho.projec+ +raffle impact area is bounded by 1-395 an +mV, north. SE 15+h Rose an the south. 1-99 an +4* west. and Lhiscayna, Say an east (Figure 4). Five roaaway segments on. five ciff*rom+ roadways currently opera+* below LOS "D Thest -roadway segments and their respective levels of service are smown in Table, 12. N) TASU 12 CXISTING 7PA" 1C COCITIONS From ALI= IM It Is+ Ave"Ve W 9" stf,"t 19 10+61 Pro*+ 4 t of 2" AvM1M if 11+ft S+f-ft+ Nt 12+n Wee+ 3 9 Go+ W10*11 PMORYD $I 13+rt S*f"+ St 1Q+n Pf 2 a" stew Sw 2" Avenue Sw Ire Av"" ADA -27 I t� IOWA it �r r 1.. 'xR 2. F_ re P.ackdround Traffic Imoec+s a. ProOrammed Improvemen♦s Approxima+ely $105 million in roadway improvements are programmed within the traffic impact area, the mcs+ significant of +nese improvements include 1) the four downtown distributor improvements. 2) the Brickell Avenue bridge over the Miami River. and 3) the SW 2na Avenue tY bridge over the Miami River. Each needed improvement's descriptionq year of constructiono costt and rpplican+ fair share is shown in Table 13." b. Sac_ ka_ d Traffic Projections Background traffic growth throughout the impact area was projected at -2.41, compounded annually, basso on the average decrease in traffic volumes in the area during tee '? >,. past five years. Projections were made for 1994. No - i adaitional road ssgn+ents would operate below LOS "0" witn the addition of 1994 background traffic. 3. Committed Development Traffic Twenty-two committed developments were laentlfiea in the traffic impact area. The names, location, use. and $eeie of these dove l opnen+s are listed In table 14. The addition of committed aevelopmert. traffic to the 1994 programmes ne+work results in no aoditianal road segment operating below LOS "M _ 29 ovmseew WessriDwor I-V TO glsc* give. ogler eooroee ls,so0 07-N- 3,747 tMtrwtore Bistribulac Blokt at wd 2e.300 es-K o2 02 ALI 07 Oars/eiw O1 str 11eetar W MI Ave. to 31 1 Ave. Ib jw awade 2.240 03-N 02 02 02 Dieawteww Olstr1 wtor DAPoot Plate Sweece Street hNrorimeats 16101 B3-N O2 02 02 irlcWI BrOft* Oren NMI Silver 9-1e. replace- 0.7if M-!0 !20 s17 NS Not fort of Mlersl BrUp.- Iod@e /s to Bloc. elve. hle. book level S.M" - 05-0i e= e2 02 Port of Mlool Bridge ooeBs is is Blsc. Blvd. Mle. Alok'level 26,e73 e6-07. 03Ci Of t,e SIB hd Avows f)rlge Ore► Weal elver "ace/elhw i00 N-N .01 02 02 0: f06M1 103,216 4,4" 5.544 9,619 See Pert Is1 - 1120 i letter from foot. 2 A fefr Mere is eat eoesoer ter oropigg" INoropoomafs fog" in fM carrewl #locos far. - a. Trio General+ion Project +reffic was projectea based on trip generation . rates derived from t4e "I-93 Downtown Distributor, Design Traffic Forecasts." AccoraIng.+o *,ie report, the trip generation rates were standarc ITE rates wit't adjustments mace to reflect trip making in tale urban setting at various tides of day. These trip generation rates are shown in Table is. r E. 4, D. TAW 19 1R1► DO 4DWATION RATS _twoo4rw Office 1o0O S.►. 01A 3.3117 3.146 17.34 Roof I 1000 S.R. WA 6.390 9.00o Me"I Roe* 1.439 1.567 20.40 tsnle. 1000 S.R. WA 3.7" 9.1" 90.00 ceeee� o.1ae i.au 1t.•i - Aet. URI* saga: AOA Protect Trafftc Projeet_I_ The addition of 1994 project +raffle to tree programea roadway network would result in no dad1+1ono1 roadway sorents fat I ing below LOS "D". I+ s."souic be note*, _ however, tha+ the project's +raffle assignments as well as 1964 roadway levels of service are subs+antiaily baso on j; Inns +rams [+ (as previously discussed) as ' we l l as a mocif led version of the prograImea Down+own Oistribu+or - 91furca+ed Ramp sys+em. This mocified design is discussed in greater detail in Sec+ion S. Additional Imprcvamen+s Needed. Table 16 shows +49 cWlulative effects of 1994 background, Commi+tad developmen+, and project traffic on +he programmed and modified rowd ne+work. and Tables 17 end 18 snow the levels of service on roadway segments for • earn of +nose lmpec+s. .. . 0: TABLE 14 3. C&WLATIvt 1*A16'QIITATION IMPACTS Se01w'ts ►►OleC+Ge to Ooere»e y 99I90 LOS 000 (13 TOM ) Oweleouer,t I"K+s I1I1111e/ Of Segments Aepe@"+ Of l0*e1 c t . ts)stllq Iotark i Ja t ,; - .`.190e QeCkQr0Y110 Q t 1l14 lQtkgrOune INO 1 �1 Carol tee Development- , Ip/: aeCllgirOtlM. CAeiwil�ee 1 31 t • am Ear I st f ngl 001801 Center • TrHfle f 1ls eeckgirOuna. C4w1"od 1 31 ene Nref)esee NI eat i Center Trot PIC SCUMS #0 9 SFRPC . S. Addltional Iffl gc t6wen+s Needed to Accommode+e Proiec+ IImD8C+s Major portions of +he +ronsporta+ion plan designed to offset +:+e anticlpa+ed impac+s and +raffic flows of the Wire Miami Center project are based on Il dificaS+ions +o FDOT's Curren+ design of +hie Down+own Ois+ribu+or Sys+em Oifurpa+eo Ramps. As +'+9se improvemen+s Nave yet +o be epprowaa by +:4e Florida 77 . rAs1E u COUAr1IE ION FEAK N11E IIWFIC DINS 19% 1941 0411 Nlaal Cea/er Eelsilag dre4 rewrd {',prw111s4 Existt�g—��aj�itiA 00 from id Olrecllea tAwe SOS _ tAi SOS, _ " _ SOS tOi . elac*pw Blvd. NE 4tb Sgeet OF %b Street N 4 A S 3 d A C C C ONE 1st AVWAO II I WE 41b Street ME IOth Street M 3 E C F F F NE 2" Avenue III ME fist Street NE 12tb Street S 3 A A A A A SY 19t Street M Sn Ist AVMW Wool Arson E 3 C w O O O SE 2" Street SE 1st Aveaw MIMI Aveave Y 2 d A d d a Olstrl8rtor SE bd AV we Emit lltryr E 1 A A A A 4i 6 !I [*trance amp Y 2 d A A A A A Orlcesll Areour SE 11th Street SE IOtb Street N 2 A A S 2 E d A O A O A O drIckes I Ariaue River Bridge N ? C A d C C S' 2 C A A A' d SW tell Arum IS) River drldge A A A A S 1 A A- C C O 141eat Avwmw Silver Irldge M ! Y/A A A A A S 3 A A A A SII Nth Street SY tad Aveaor SY 3N Arian E !A A A A A SE Nth Street SE lit Areaw drtemol E. � A A A A � SE rob Street *Ickes$ Meal Avowe Y, 2 C A d d • •' SOI/ICE t ABA, SF#FC w J 1 L _ .,{u.,. J%<x^�'V: -'�lA.�'.'Cv �C��sf5';}iC•SCi"�3XP3�keWi'Sc.i4i1Nw'iwA9%�S.fT �IYx1'umuc3vm.iia4 '�„: `. .< .. .. .. ... ,....f „..".. b K§s'a5..naR .n.. ..l ,.. .. _ _xx.. .S�"l Ai.0 S'L.f...�, .r _M+a.y .n... _..� i..d w..a..:t.:.O::SW� these modifications are not incorporated into an already planned and programmed transportation Improvement, then many Of t ff f tti a ra i c ass i grn+ent s ano prof acted 1770 I eve 1 s o Mery ! ce for rosaway segments in the impact area rill not hold true. The improvements as discussed by the Dupont Plaza task force' `t are shown In Table 19. in addition to these improvements, th• Applicant proposes: (1) conversion of a portion of the eastbound btfurcated ramp from embankment an* retaining wall to ' P, additional structure length to allow passenger car ana van Y:L clearance for access tp the local service roaaway. (2) the u Z f" Biscayne Boulevard May south side service road, and (3) minor ` gswetr is Improvements at the SE 2nd Avenue and Biscayne _ Boulevard May intersection. No extension to the eastbound bifurcated ramp is proposed. The proposed modifications are shown to Figure S. Table 20 lists the effects of the project end Improvaments on critical In+ersections within the traffic impact area. e The Dow+ Plaza task force Is an advisory group cons l =f l ng of m4obers of local owerrAent, th* W+ropol itan Planning Organisation, and Florida Depar+mont of Transportation. 1. Aaattlopfl structure 490• x 3e' 2. %telning Wall section (330' • 9901) x 3e• J. lndeoanoent retaining Well structure for cdnnsc+or to X Jrd Ave. 2Q0' x 21 • x 401 Increment I. NO oanstructlon of additional lane on 2 3ro St. befusen $ 21+d Ave. and 2 3ro Ave. 3901, x 1=//9 recm structlon 390, x 2 curb and putter S. Traffic signals at SE 3ro Ave./elscayne $Iwo. Vey ono st Smatnr,ast Sx Financial Canter garage 6. Aodltlonal features OW widening 3ro Ave. between Biscayne Blvd. z; War am K 3ro St. 2I0' x 331/9 (Intl. Pat "a traffic sewstlonl :.y -sa a.;• A. *Single ald*w Construction adjateee to Qlpont Plata IOtel • ISO• � i. Nara oefmplax slgping0 slonslltatton, and warkings >d More complex pintenand of treffle SOURCt: AOA ..... . TABLE 20 11199 1j%J 3 OF SDVICB WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC Aug IWRC%tME}fTs { + rrtn ►rojen ritaloo srolaet _ �. Intaaeetlon rlt� 1prwwnts rl+,ou+ `tnaroWeMn•• a 31Id Avenue t SE 2m Street i A .. . a 6. S[ 3Pd Avenue a X Ind Street C A a be Street t St Financial Canter C A BlaCsrype Siva. a X b+d Street C A ilscayne Siva. 8 t1,401n Plats A • ilscaWe Blvd. S SE 3rd Street i A ` Blacstne Blvd. A so. U1401 C t Center I Oars" Si 3ra Avenue l 1116csvoe Blvd. ray B 0 SE b►a fwepue t Blscaywe Blvd. May 0 0 ;�, . � b� AverPua i 1�3 0lstritsu+lop C ! .:., awe ' K 3ro !venue t SS 3rd Street C C ' RGURE 5 PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE DO DISTRIBUTOR BIFURCATED RAMP SYSTEM SHO4MNG THE 3 ADDED APPUCANT FECOWENDED IWROOVEMgS The a0ditlonal costs for the ramp alteration is that of extending the two-1 ane structure approximately f 1 tty feet. This cost would be partialIy'offso+ by eliminating the need for programmoo optics signal izeflon and a modest reduction in right of way requirements along Biscayne Boulevard Nay for the combined ramp and surface street roadways. Incidental additional costs would be involved In the ramp terminus treatment near Biscayne Boulevard. Excluding right-of-way, the net difference in construction cost is approximately $8O.0OO. _The saditional cost for construction of a separate south side service roadway along Biscayne Boulevard would, in part, be offset by reaucing the number of required through lanes on Biscayne Boulevard May from three to two. More curb and ., gutter, drainage structures, and pavement are needed with this • alteration than was anticipated with the ODA staff proposal. .. Although sidewalk was not shown on the south side of Biscayne Bou 1 ev and Way In the DOA staff propose i , +tie Dupont Plaza Task Force has indicated +ha+ i+ would be'desirable, and it probably would have been included in a finalized MA plan. Sidewalk Is included in +hIs proposal. The net difference in construction Cost between +he plans (to gain a south side service road and tree flow movemen+s from +h# eastbound reap and the +hrough' lanes on Biscayne Boulevard fray) is approximately $55,boo. 'r 39 F f .. :.<Jk - The Minor gwmo+ric revision at the SE 2nd Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard May lntersection to provide channeliz4tion, a better radius return, and resulting in improved traffic flow, should;' ado no more than 53,000 additional to the roadway proposal ' prepared for the Downtown Development Autmority staff. Table 21 1 lets the three App l scant -proposed lmproven+ents needeo to accommodate project impactst their cost and the App i icant' s ay� 1 fair share. Am1TIOWL 1040 2 f0 M OO1M1O11M1 ONr1O" 81MICAM r 0AP $Tints M0 TO ACCO1SIMA1t 01112iCT IM0Cn. ANI leAM poor f zr QW hiwa also N ft" ! t 00.000 ' Mow" la R = V4 � O y /1"Ov" Oive. Mr n Consideration of th0 ftlNing of needed improvamonts to the - extsttng roadway network is compltcated in this 16staf+ce out to two factors. The first relates to the design of twe programmea Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Rmp system. while the 1± I or ida ,, } Depar+m*nt of Transportation has been proceeding wIth a find! . design, the MOT design (see Figure 6) does not Include the 40 .aft ••d'°."i { � t �� d t,t r 1,.. 92Y t - ...._.• - _ a '! FOLNE ,8 CURRENT, FOOT DESIGN FOR THE DOWIVTO M CMSTAIBEITOR 81FURWE'D RAC' SYSTEM IJi i ` 1 u� III asI CHOM i e,al� aa/ (air a • � 1 : Ill. / a 1 fl.At• n /11 1 ° 1'1 SE 2W III. IN SgttN1AS1 /INNiIAI LINTIN GNWA Alp/'1AN 11! M/Ai/ NNASI ilNMCiAI •II 1 A fIN11N Itl �ww� aao S _— ._..� •._:1-- may_` _ .�,,,I WAV- .�., it's INN'/lNI HAM IN)I1 I.. Mae Ifications discussed by the Dupont Plaza task force or those contained in the Applicant's proposed cosign. The second relates to +me timing of the ramp construction. Originally. the project was scheduled for the current fiscal year. Due to federal cutbacks and other circumstances FOOT now projects +m@ completion for 1988. however, it remains uncertain whether the timing of the completion of the ramps will be coincident with the Applicant's proposed project phasing. Under normal circumstances, encountering a situation such as this one would result in a recommendation for project denial and staff would have roQuostod that the Applicant voluntarily dot ay Council's conslderetion pending resolution of these major problems. However, working with the City. FOOT and the developer thr" things are apparent: 1) that most of these problems can be resolved in the near future; 2) the project is economically important to the region; and 3) the developer's time is constrained regarding project financing. Therefore, staff has' agreed, at the Applicant's request, to address approval of interim phasing of the proposed project incependent of design t` or coincidence with the Bifurcated Ramp system. in order t® both accurately assess the impacts caused by interim phases of the project (in the absence of the bifurcated ramps) Ono to recomend adeduate mitigation of those impacts, the surface street network, along with the preliminary surface street improvements suggested by the City of Miami's Public Works 42 Department, was oxmim*d for the year 1991. The year 1991 was chosen because it reflects the most probable year of occupancy for Phase 1. The oxamineflon was basso on +mo following assumptions: 1) only one of the Applicant's two proposed structures would be constructed, 2) +me Sifurca+ed Ramp system would not be in place, 3) some form of interim improvements to SE Second Avenue and project entrance areas would be undertaken by the Developer, 4) no additional development In the 3 block area directly west of the proposed project site would take place In the absence of the bifurcated ramps, and 5) some form of inter sect ion lmprovfmon+ would be performed along SE 2no Street. Unknowns In our analysis are the precise Interim improvements needed to ensure adequate levels of service, prior to the development and construction of the bifurcated ramp system. These particulars are still In +he planning phases, and final lmprovwen+s and costs Pro to be determined by the City of Miami. However, +hose are primarily local roadways ano a preliminary list of possible Improvements, as CoWMIMOG by' the Cl+yls Department of Public Works, Includes: A. DUO*n+-PI82a Imoroyemon+s 1. SE 2no Avenue and SE 3ra Street Adjust west curb on public land on sout4bouna approach and adjust +raffle signal moods as required, +ocroa+s four versus pr*s*n+ three Sou+,4bound 43 MA tw�buph lanes. lane crop to be *as IIy acconmmocatoc south of intersection within existing pavement through to" turn at Biscayne Boulevard May prior to Brickelt Avenue bridge approacm. Modify signing and striping throughout section as required. 2. SE 2nd Avenue and SE 2nd Street Adjust channolizetton curbing in southeast corner to provide two wostbound through Iones and thr" separate left turn lanes• plus one free flow to" turn lane inside modified channeiization Island. Two of the left turn lanes for access to t-gs entrance ramp moor SE 2nd Avenue and SE arc Street.'one mandatory and ono optional . Adjustment of channelizetton island in soutnoast _ corner to also allow three southbounc +4roug4 ianes, transitioned through intersection with skip guide I Ines. (One mandatory right turn i one and two +~rough lanes currently in place.) a: Revise signal head d i sp 1 ayrss . pedestrian featureso overhead and other signings and pavement markings as ' 44 t Q t. v - 3. Biscayne plaza Protec+ Entrance Entrance and exit drives to be coordinated with ultimate bifurcafeo ramp design and City of Miami' Public Works Department. Geometric alterations at project drives near Biscayne Boulevard Nay and Biscayne Boulevard May. This is to Include revised drainage as necessary, outside pavement widening within existing right of way, signalizetion of exit drive fo be installea "n warranted, and revised pavement markings. Also provide custom material and cons+ruction for approximately i,200 feet of sidewalks along project - sfreef frontage and riverxalk frontage, and all seating, lighting, and lanoscaping, all for public use. 4. Biscayne Boulevard Nay Acciss Aoaaway City to preserve present public rig!rr of way for r }' separate 1191 eastbound access roaaway soufl of Biscayne Boulevard Nay +o ex+eno from SE 3rd Avanus +o Biscayne Plaza project sou+h veMicular traffic entrance. preservation fo ex+ond at leas+ fo date Of eomple+ion of project phase 2. (Separafe access roadway na+ deemed necessary +o project Phase i.) 45 't b. Surroundins Area Improvements (Outside Ouoont Plaza) ' 1. SE 2nd Street be♦wen South Miami Avenue and SE Is+ Avenue : City seeks approximately five feet of additional right of way within this block that is necessary to Y; create three westbound lanes, an aoditlon of one travel lane. At the Miami Avenue intersection. this 'w Improvenent would allow a separate left turn lane, a separate through lanes and a separate lane used as a combination through and slant right to the 1-95 entrance ramp 7 t; 2. ' SE 2nd Street between SE Is+ Avenue and SE 2na r Avenue Master roadway -plan calls for three travel lanes wlthin this section of SE 2nd Street, to be Constructed wlthin existing public right of way. ( Two +rave I lanes present I y prov ided . ) The projected levels of service for street men+s in the down+own area for 1991 will s+lll Opera+e Wow LOS "0" even n' with the proposed In+er ins projec+ Impacts and Improvemen+s. However, +hese 1991 LOSS do represent an improvement over tht LOSS curren+iy experienced in the area. Who+ may bar more Indicative of the health of the +ranspor+a+ion system In +his 46 • case. are the levels of service on intersections in the area as shown in Table 22. Critical intersections In the immeaiata area will operate at an acceptable LOS with interim phasing of - the project, independent of the bifurcated ramps, proviaed tnat interim improvements are made to +no surface street network. YOU 2 IM QITICAL 1111ERsECTICK VIT#1W •IIMCAT[Q 4W SVM Ift"111 "*N N D.0:�. rlmuln r.Ojwq K 1�►AIIMIII�• INtA111Ant• IM►wMM+1 IINAf�ftlM Los L" 03 E[ 21r fte. w 2M It. M • • A AI t 3" AN. p See It. AV 0 t 0 � C 0 • =211�Aw.A•1W."M ONC 0 0 •111s. ftV ONO • • • i, K 3h Me. M 2" It. All • C A ' /M f E[ 3h Ave. wee Ire St. aw [ E A A h Ave. MA •I worm All • C C . give* II y C C C •1Aen1+� tlw.�+•e�.r A11 u. • • :/A DriveA>M • • r SOUK[$ 00. sIM _ 6. Perkin The axis+ing structure contains 1.150 covered parking spaces. The proposed additions +o the project will provide approximately 1.200 Covered parking spaces. All will be loce+ed out of sigh+ inside +he building base on floors 3-10. Parking access will be via internal floor ramps and o four•lsne 47 ` j OF/ } ,'. s` building entry -exit arive connection to Biscayne Boulevara. The signalizeo access arive will be located at the northwest Corner of the project site and adjacent to the Bell Office ' ' parking garage. Parking control will be by both an electronic gate and a control booth, both of which will be located along the main entry -exit. In addition, the project has the permanent rig:, through the site purchase agreement, to long-term lease of up to 600 adaitional parking spaces on the remaining three -blocks of Dupont Plaza iMSC118te1y west of the site. With the addition - of the 600 parking spaces lmmooiately Wes+ of the project, +40 provision of parking should be adequate for both proposed and existing structures. 7. Mass Transit A major dvmponent of +me planned transportatton system for th*- Dupont Plaza area Is a reliance on the Downtown PeopI*'M*vor -system. The system is an enlarged loop that circles the entire downtown area. Tht. closes+ existing DPM station Is iccatea northwost of the existing Ball Point development, as shown in Figure 7. The Applicantls traffic assumptions heavily rely not = only on significant transit .ridership, but also on small percentages of grave level pedestrian traffic being gonera+oa by such ridership. Grade level peaestrian traffic needs to be 48 y e t �i S'- ' SAVPMW PARK / CMOPIN PLAZA STAYtON'' M1 ilii , . r ».._0-1 ill, •t tw tact? 3 SOURCE: AOA, SFRPC Florida we"&"" **"MAP A .department of "A ransportation* stamp&" "'.7. C. Miami Regional Service Center 401 N.W. 2nd Avenue, Room 510 JAN P, Miami, Florida .33128-1794 January 24, 1986 24 1989 Ms. Ane Deister Interim Director South Florida Regional Planning Councl 3"0 Hollywood 3oulevards Suite 140 Hollywood, Florida 33021 KN Dear Ms. Dtister:rMr Re: Mimi Center I ADA and WPA Item Nos. 6113307s 61133759 6113376 State Job Nos. 87006-3503*-25079-3505 Downtown Distributor,, Bifurcated Ramps and Surface Streets At the meeting I attended an Wednesday, January 22, 1986 at your, officu_­ regarding the transportation elements of the Miami Center I Application- f w orDevelopment Approval, a question as raised as to the status of the construction schedule for the Downtown Distributor and Bifu rcated Ramps. Recently the Development Order for Miami Center 11 expired. That devel ment order included a provision for the donation of the right$ -of -way needed to construct the Bifurcated Ramps section of the Downtown Distributor. It also included an exaction for certain local street improvements that. are necessary components of the project design. The expiration of the Miami Center 11 DevelopmentOrder, and thus loss of the provision for righ Of -way, has su6stanti&lly.changed the schedule and cost of the Bifurcated Ramps project. The current Transportation Improvement "ram (TIP) shows that construction of this project is scheduled to begin this fiscal year. This will mt.*ccur. The need to acquire the right-of-way has set the beginning of construction back at least two fiscal years. At this time the Department is developing ,a plan for acquisition of the needed right-of-way. The annual update of the Department's Five -Year Transportation Plan will show a financial plan that commits the needed right-of-way funds in the Current fiscal year and schedules the needed construction funds in Fiscal Year 87/88 as follows; 12 0 s Ms. Ant Deister South Florida Regional Planning Council January 24, 1986 Page 2 WPA Item No. Description Type Funds Amount F.Y. of1 000's Conmjt*e^.t 6113307 Downtown Distributor • Interstate 44 Bifurcated Ramps Construction S33,600* 87/8 6113375 Bifurcated Ramps Interstate 4•R Right -of -Way 209300 85/6 6113376 Bifurcated Ramps Local Funds 29300* 87/8 Local Streets Construction T 0 T A L $560200 *The Department is currently reviewing the construction cost.estimates. The unexpected requirement to acquire right-of-way has increased the public cost to construct the project by an estimated 20 million dollars. Funds :for interstate improvement projects of this, type are prioritized on a state - .wide basis,' Longstanding commitments to projects in other areas may impact funding availability for this project. In addition, the Gramm-Rudman Act and the pending renewal of the Highway Act adds uncertainty as to the level of federrl funding in the fature. The Oepartment'i update of its Five -Year Transportation Plan is currently underway. It I$ our intent to modify the schedule and costs of this project In -our Five -Year Transportation Plan, and submit the modified plan.for the annual update of the TIP. Both -the Department's Five -Year Transportation Plan and the MVO's TIP will be adopted in June. The UpartA+ent.has already submitted a list of proposed changes to the Transportation Planning Council of the MPO which included the modification of the Bifurcated Ramp Project's schedule and costs. If necessary, the Department will take action W formaally amend the TIP at this time. Regardless of this, it is impossible for the Department to proceed •with construction of this project without the needed right-O-way.. Sincerely, l Thomas L. Thomson District Director Planning and Programs TLT:en cc: Jose -Luis Mesa John Taylor s3 p Florida Department of -anspolrtation "a GRARMA 1 Miami PAigiawl service center 402 N.W. 2nd Avenue - Suite 590 Miami. Florida 33128 "064M L 9"w" (ACKTUM JWANCY 16, 1986 w. William Powell, Director Metro Dade Camty Public Works Dept. Ill N.W. 13t Street MLxd, Florida 33131 RE: 1-95 Bif=cat*d Rams W.P.I. No.: 6113307 State Project No.: 87006-1503 Fedml Job No.: nt-95-10502 CmmgX,: Dade Dw Mr. P&Jall: J AN 16 11 SWE"50 As !uasud the Dupont Plaza Technicalof 60 on% I A raviand the aconceptual al proposal foe 1-95Rf=RwVS prepwad by 11rxW= Analysis Profaisionals, Thc. and dated Aumm -It 1985. It is our re that this proposal be rejected on the follower basis. • Ma wwtbcurA and westbound freeway sepmts, Includta%g the rm=ps will. not provide aft WXAPtAbIO IVAI Of 34rAft. • "sdxmd off ramp np to the parking pand to S.E. 3rd Ave= we too close together. 0 Biscsym Blvd., from Biscayne Blvd. to S.E. 3rd S=wt will operate at an uncMuble Iral of service. A undiutrabIt --cric car%fig=atim of pnp en=mce at S.E. 2nd AvwAss - and heir relationship wish the proposed sioul at that 1WAtiM. We are prepared to presw%t our reewmendatims to the tech cal cwzi-.:s* at. your &.wdm=. if ou v need any Inform tt:L=. please feel fry ftrchw to ince fta R. Ro Dawri Direac-or Pr=ocUctim RR1t:Q= cc: Servuldo P&apar, Ambos Mwmrt&. Ron Hock, Y*n Vorce, Frak %,tftogor. TOM Dooms Jim ftmble.r, FLTW 15 4 74 Vtis s..MP • FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE George Fimmom DIVISION OF ARCHIVES. HISTORY AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT AUG 12 The Capitol. Tallahassee. Florida 32301.8020 1985 (904) 488.1480 ' Auqust,.7, 1985 2z Reply Refer to: Mike Wisenbaker Historic Sites Specialist (904) 487-2333 Mr. Barry Peterson South Florida Regional Planning Council 3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 140 Hollywood, Florida 33021 RE: Letter of July 11,'1985 from Ethan Minsky Cultural Resource Assessment Request Amended ADA for the Miami Center DRI, Dade County, Florida Dear Mr. Paterson: In our review of this project we'noted a discrepancy between what is stated as the answer to Question 193 in the above cited document and what was recommended in the letters included in the appendix (on pages 19.A.1-1 and 19.A.2). Whereas the answer to Question 19B. indicates in the event any "underground archaeological • resources are uncovered during excavations, a qualified archaeologist will be requested to examine them as required by law," the letters from the Dade County Historic Survey and from the Florida Division of Archives and History, on the other hand, explicitly state that "an archaeologist should be present during the earliest phases o! subsurface excavation of the most extreme western portion of the Ball Point tract to determine 4f such archaeological data exists beneath the fill. The presence of an archaeologist (to monitor) construction activities in this specific area of the project would insure that significant data, artifacts and features would be recognized, recorded and possibly recovered before their destruction". It remains the recommendation of this office, that unless this area is preserved as green space, that a professional archaeologist be present in order to observe ground disturbing activities in the western portion of the Ball Point tract in the event cultural resources may be present. r - �J . Mr. Barry Peterson August 7, 1985 - Page Two If you have any questions concerning our co=ents, please do .not hesitate to contact us. Your interest and cooperation in helping to protect Florida's archaeological and historical resources are appreciated. sincerely, George W. Percy, Chief - Sureau of Historic Preservation,-' G'AP/'Pkp cc: 'Gary Rresel -Robert Cars.' rR` �k llv� Sty:^ •}4 t t1 �: ZV )P'sL n 4 t 56 Its i' d xAvitw L. Uaw« «.roe December 13, 1985 Mr. Russell D. L. Wirth, Jr. Wirth i Company 5,20 Srickell Key Drive Suits 1204 Miami, Florida 33131 Dear Mr. wirths • e. Oft 350700 �,..,,. r�e�a. oasaa • o+o • asa•sss•�o�o ,3. S�F.R, p• � JAN 21 1986 on wisth i Company and its development team are to be congratulated for your -confident in Miami and the private initiative you have taken in the development of Biscayne Plaza, a $400 million mixed- :uao.co,aplez which will be a world -class Miami landmark and the largest in our downtown, located at the mouth of the Miami River 3 in the heart of the city. Your willingness to collaborate closely with City officials has made.our job of review much easier and will, t am sure, result in an extremely valuable _addition to this great international city. The City of Miami has always worked closely with the business and - development c=nunity in furthering the devlopmnt of.downtown .Mimi.. tn.the past ton years, we have seen over 87 new public and -private -projects built worth in excess of $3 billion.. Biscayne Plaza will be an excellent addition, bringing both world -class quality and employment to our city. In reviewing your project, we note several elements which are o: particular -benefit to the citizens of Miami. First, Wirth a .Company's concept of mixed -use (residential and retail as Well as .office space) will create a dynamic "urban village".and active people -place in the heart of downtown. Second, the Saywalk .promenade, *which you will build with private funds and will open for public use, will link Sayfront Park and the Rouse Sayside Project to our Conference and Convention Center on the Miami. River with t beautiful walkway, restaurants and cafes"lining your project. Third, the scale and world -class quality of your development will make it a Miami landmark and potential rival to Rockefeller Center in Now York. Fourthe and certainly not least, will be the 3,500 direct and indirect construction jobs, and 10,000 permanent office tenant jobs, this project will generate, as well as added tax revenues for our city and neighborhood needs. Finally, for two years now, mirth 6 Company has committed its primate capital 100% at risk to this city -building effort and Will attract $400 million of additional private institutional funds, all without seekinq public financinq, public subsidy or Public assistance other than reasonable approvals; an excellent eXample of ghat primate initiative can do with City •ncouraq�emerit, . Si •r- ay.. % 16n+ F. R. IF, Ce MIAMI, FLORIDA 33,29-1 973 (303) 375.2557 AUG 1-91985 K f ALigust 15, 1985 t� .. _ . Mt. Et'lan Minsky 4 Hallywell Corporation ti 300 M.Mmi Center y 100 010pin Plaza $' I it Florida 33131 BE: Mimi Center 1 - CotQliance to the Biscayne Bay Shoreline Develqumt Rsvisw Ordinance 85-14 ti Deaf Mr Minsky Skis letter is in referenee to yea project known as Mi=L Caztar T. rd how it will be affected Dada County OrdiPince 85-14 ` _ (ShoralL-* Dave t Review) and Resolution 257-85 (S1=eline DsveiapL�nt Ravf Mtrsulal�. mlis-legisLtian �.-as ed by the C�Ly Ga cd-sio�n Ar. an afforc: to apply unifozm di" iposnt standards regardless of Jurisdictional bo�ai�sies. In addition to the stancards setforth. a review coerfttea has been established which is charged with the responsibility of 4xAdr#..& "C project within tba review bomdaxy and fa=ulating a recoccwdadcn: to 'tihether - a project ccan&r= to the spirit and intent of:. t!ia Legislation. Therefore, Wore a W fkal DRI action ' is taken, the zequi.reow.ts :sot lbrth in the legislation must be satisfied. To assist you in process. I have enclosed a copy of dha above um nticr ad docu mts . Zf this office can be of any assista=e please dcu't hesitate to call. • Ciw.�.®l v W$/jm Paolo cee Berry Patersaa, AICP, S'EM Sergio Rod.-iguu. Director City of W.Ncd, PIxMjr,g Dept. 6, y' _" a T,n a p 1: uo January 309 1986 Ms. Ant Oeister Acting Executive Director r South.Florida Regional Planning Council 3440 Hollywood Boulevard Hollywood, FL RE: MIAMI CENTER I DEVELOPMENT ORDER Dear Ms. Deister:ti Per your request, attached is the current status of the Miami Center I a Development Order with two attachments. Also enclosed is the, latest proposal for settlement of outstanding issues as proposed by the attorney for Bank of New York. .For your additional information, a memorandum to the Miami City Comi ssi on from the City Manager, dated June 12, 1985, is also enclosed pertaining to an agreement for the developer's use of Bayfront Park, which was not part of the Development Order. Sincerely,. ergib Bodrigu*z, Director Planning Department SR/JWM/rj Attachments cc: Walter L. Pierce, Assistant City Manager Donald W. Cather, Director, Department of Public Works Ethan Minsky, Shea and Gould Jeffrey Bercow, Steel, Hector, Davis 60 �{ Ati•tii�G i}(�4�i4rt[1T 2's % W .'rid $III-v •VI•a r11.60l►e r M�uunt 10fiMS1 P:i fly► jC'3� 41 +.r. F•prQ; ii..ij`Q•� SEIrC:0 is CURRENT STATUS:, MIAMI CENTER I DEVELOPMENT ORDER —. The current status of the development, as approved and as built, is described as follows: Condition 1 •ComponentAs Approved As Built Phase I Office Tower 8059400 GSF 791,000 GSF Retail 85.000 GSF 969297 GSF Hotel (630 units) (634 units). 658.400 GSF 6891,000 GSF Parking Spaces 1670 sp. 1145 sp.* Phase II Residential 500 units ** Not constructed Parking Spaces 615 sp_ 2,365 sp Floor Area.Ratio (net) 6.36 4.27 Lot. Coverage 83S Undetermined { Ground Usable Open 17S Phase II not Pedestrian. Open 16% constructed ; Space at Main Floor Level *1145 regular spaces can accoewodate 1485 valet parking spaces. **Reduced to 324 units: letter from Mr. Gould January 210 1983. Page 1 of S' • y 1_ e�fi a. The developer may delete a portion of the project e+9.9 Phase- 2 residential units and related parking. The Development Order limits the project, but does not require that all parts be built. A similar situation pertains to conditional use approval. - b. There is a difference between the amount of parking a) proffered by the developer and approved by the Commission and b) actually provided for the office building and hotel. The Development Order 'limited" the project to no more than 2365 parking spaces and did not make the 2365 spaces a requirement; the developer may have intended to make up the shortfall of 525 spaces (1670-1145) elsewhere on the site and the developer proceeded under a valid building permit issued by the City for existing Miami Center I. c. Recent information provided by the developer shows that the area for retail and hotel may have been exceeded in existing Miami Center I, necessitating an "after -the -fact" amendment to the Development Order. Thor current status of the remaining conditions and compliance thereto is described as follows: Conditions 2. Project considerations: --riverwalk amenities -•facade treatment --bay and. river views --podium landscaping 3. Riverwalk and 8aywalk: amenities, easement, dedication, construction and maintenance. Developer Compliance Compliance prior to issuance of building permit for Phase I; Phase 2. unresolved. Partial compliance: baywalk (Phase i) easement recorded rby Resolution 83-129; February .10. 1983. The - construction of the baywalk surface has been completed but there is no landscaping, benches or street furniture or lighting. A S50O,000 performance bond to guarantee construction of the riverwalk (Phase a) - has expired. Ri verwalk . easement .is being held Lin escrow by. the City Clerk, per Resolution_ 83-i30 February 10, 1983, to be recorded when construction 'is cowplotdd or by the year 1990, whichever co"S first. Partial compliance: concrete sub base installed lanQf�papi.g, travortino surface and. barrier quordroil not The 1,00,4rtMent Of PuBj i c Works _110 C ►1 `144 „4, barrier oe .interim safety nsea�cure. 82 .. W and traffic barriers (it required) should be installed upon completion of the Corps of Engineers project. 14, 5. Upper level pedestrian connec. No compliance; the City judges tion to DCM station in Biscayne that DCM station was constructed iir Boulevard. the "vicinity" of Biscayne Boulevard and S.E. 2nd and 3rd Streets. The current owners of existing Miami Center I judge that this requirement %A is not now feasible because of the station shift of location. 6. Consider upper level pedestrian Compliance unenforceable. Condition connection between Miami Center is to "consider' not to "require". A I and II stronger requirement in Miami Center • 11 Developmen" has expired. 7. Payment or bond for equitable Condition superseded. Caft County share of interim traffic im. Department of Traffic and Transpor- provements at a time set by tation letter of April 28, 1979 City prior to issuance of a (Attachment A) accepted developer. C.O. Al.ternate, IV which provided a) reversal of two eastbound lants on existing SE 3rd Street with' forced left at SE 2nd Avenue plus an additional westbound thru lane on SE I .A 3rd Street from SE 2nd to S. E. 3rd Avenue and geometric alterations to the 1-95 distributor ramp; b) extension of one southbound -lane on BlIscayne Boulevard between. SE' -2 nd to .3rd Strest'and 0 a restricted left on SE3 A4enuo at SE'3 Street. The developer subsequently maintained that these interim improvements conflicted with and were superseded, by plans for the 1-95 bifurcated raps and the associated - local street system.. S. Funding traffic Improvements Partial compliance: S52,000 credit adjacent to' si te: for Biscayne Boulevard work. Two other improvements were accomplished. -four traffic lanes on Biscayne by others: the traffic island in Boulevard from south end to Biscayne Boulevard near SE 3rd SE 2nd Street and necessary Street was v V*d by the Dad* dedication. County Trinsportation-Advinistration (DCTA) for the Downtown Comipowt of -retttoval of traffic island near Hetrorail and r0piVed by.' So r uthtaiit SE 3 Street. Bank, and -the 2nd 'left turn lant. northbound from Biscayne Boulevard -provision of traffic signal at to SE 2nd Street was cleared by the. SE 3 Street. OCTA and Constructed by $outh#a$tr:. Bank. The owners of existing Miami a -addition of 2nd left tun lane Center I have offered to provide the 7 northbound onto SE 2nd Street. traffic signal at SE 3rd Street. Note that the' Miami Center II Development Order (now expired) by reference. apportioned $481.598 (in 1980 dollars) in surface street 10. Chopin Plaza parking provisions 11. Provision of parking spaces for condominiums equivalent to Dade County Zoning Code. improvements to Miami Center I (see Attachment 8). The $52,000 credit refers to line 7 of Attachment B. Note the interplay of Conditions 6 and 7: the developer successfully argued that Condition 6 was superseded by subsequent plans for the I-95 bifurcated ramps and associated local street system and then the developer was relieved of S481.598 (452.000 noted above) in associated local street system improvements allocated to .Miami Center I, as specified in the Miami Center II Development Order, when that Development Order expired. No compliance, but owners of exist- ing Miami Center I have offered the dedication. Partial compliance. The Public Works Department and Department of Off Street Parking approved plans and completed final inspection of construction of the parking area only,, except the travertine surface remins to be placed on the sidewalk on the north side of Chopin Plaza. Phase 2 condominium not constructed. The developer's original proposal was 695 parking spaces for 50O condominium units. The Dade County Department of Traffic and Transportati onr (Attachment A) cited 860 parking spaces for 500 condominium units. The developer. by letter of January 21, 1983 stated his intention of constructing 324 condominium units (for which 69S parking spaces would ant the OOTT recommendation). Via:: t 12. Analysis of seer+ Marine Communities. impact on Compliance: ilysis by E.S. Iverson Biologist, University of Miami Rosenstiel School, dated June 13, 1979, supplied to the City by letter of May 16, 1985. However, information supplied by the developer to the South Florida Regional Planning Council on August B, 1995 indicates that the seawall. bulkhead modifications have been completed necessitating an "after - the -fact" permit. 13. Notice to Dade County Historic Survey of project start. M .Complex source permit. Compliance Superseded: issuance of complex source permits by State has been suspended. aWgVWW OR* s4. rWVai 1 uses hrki r 4 Spaces: 2350 Hotel : Owlling Units: 130 DRI Threshold: Office Park - 300,000 sq. ft. II CONCLUSIONS -SO REC_OtliENO TIOON The Miami Center I Development of Regional Impact (ORI)) is a proposed and partially existing office complex with supporting retail,,.hotei,,.and residential ruses located Jnr dQWtoWn NJSMJ aiWg Biscayne :e:fi�rr <at. Qupont Flux. Oevelopment.of the balance of the site is bed culed.to occur;in two phases from 19U7 "I. In reviewir� the available data, staff his concluded that the project could be developed in such a canner that regional adverse impacts would not be likely to occur with regard to drainage,stofwatsr d�uuality, writer -related vegetation and wildlifet water use and wastewater S fluent disposal. two to -its site and impervious cover, this project will require a General Permit for its surface water management system. At that time the applicant will need to confirm that the Miami Dade Motor and Sewer Authority water Use Permit No. 13-00017 has been modified to include •n.atlocation of grater sufficient to service this project atom with all other cowrmitted users. In adeition, a Water Use Permit will also be required fro® this District for any dewatering required for the subgrade portions Of the proposed construction. 66 Jak, :F �� x 'r, _3 III GENERAL PROJECT RELATED INFORMATION The Miami Center I DRI is an already existing and proposed office complex located on a 8.46 acre site in downtown Miami next to Biscayne Bay, t Ba front Park, and Dupont Plaza on the east side of Biscayne Boulevard (see Exhibit 1). Phase I of the project, known as The Miami Center Existing, is already developed on the northern 5.45 acres of the site and consists of the Edward Ull Office Building (791,000 s4. ft. of office space plus 14,750 sq. ft. of retail space). tFie 634-room Pavillion Hotel, the .Podium which contains t.. 7S,D00 sq. ft. of retail space plus 800 parking spaces, and a 300-space office parking structure. Phases 11 and III,.scheduled to be built in 1997•B9 and 1990-91 respectively, are known as Biscayne Plaza Phase 1 and Biscayne Plaza Phase 2 and will be located on the southern 3.01 acres o the site. The Biscayne Plaza Phase 1 office tower.will include 60 dwelling units, 700,OQA sq. ft. of.office uses, and 160,000 sq. ft. of retail uses and adds_1,200 parking spaces to the Podium Parking garage. The Phase 2 office tower will include 90 dwelling units, 780,000 sq. ft. of office uses, and $09000 sq. ft. of.retail uses. Exhibit 2 shows the Master Site Plan for the total Miami Center I project. At present the site is zoned C80-1 (Central Business District). The proposed uses are consistent with both the zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations. : F.. This.revier has been performed by South Florida Mater Management District to provide'_�;the South`Florida Regional Planning .Council w1tA a regiooat.assesseent Of rater -elated impacts of thts,project from the Districts perspective.' This assessment: s not a porn t.under Chapter 373, F.S., nor is it a qua an for. saidpets 67 II sc are location -and route torecti vin t!r X ' SC S Mtn Strol elevations ; vi nMnt 1` ter use flooX floor -a a ro et on 16 I'l In encroac n net - _ X ndrainage ... �•elan • �G. SUBJECT: WATER SUPPLY AND DEVELOPMENT MIAMI CENTER I DR1 83-205 Fr—oposed Potable water wurce: miami Dade water &no bower AUZn0rity Permit is 13.00017 (Alexander Orr/Snapper Crook) Permitted Allocation: 130 MGvO Current Usuage: 131.622 MG0 (1) Expiration Date: 12-13-89 Projected Demand: 0.785 NGD Proposed Non -Potable Water Source:- N/A Projected Demand: so - II (See footnoto'g" pa . • s • • • • .•Y�Y9111A••IIN9tlM®• r • urviltig X (I) • (See footnotes on page 6) 70 b. . : RESOLVABLE AT PERMIT T M :'d :RESOLVE: :UNRESOLVEa• :UNRESOLVEC f ,3 ,SUQJECT:-WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT I and veraQe daily de�and (MGQ� III • i � on nd ion or Was Fit Iva , scat on -a Tdtention/detention areas ;�$40trtiod,.of SWN system rot �astevater disposal r .o : rif ewi er reus MIAMI CENTER I ORI 85.2O5 (grour water rrw arge; 1 ake : 4 thdraw : ate. l fenflarfor adverse impacts: Nu lity l quantity. n 111tv1 • a: nq : in I' a uiremant • e r IV 0 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENT MIAMI CENTER I DRI 85-205 RE50LVABLE AT PERMIT TIM[ :RESOLVED: MAJOK :UNRESOLVED: I Wetlands r. — =Uknit (acres) 8. imsting conamon) /A • : II C. s I H, Ilk Sensitive lands A:,: n anger* DICUS n1aus : MIA : N4A : H/A III C. ther isave Our Kivers; aquifer 2 chust, areas-, 0 C-1 preservationz!1ticatign : : X A. uAntity N/A uat-tty— tenha"c"ont/decradation) NIA C,F117nagement 3cnm (manageo elevations, buffers, littaral stones: $15-1 N/A IV Compatibility of proposed land use a natural characteristics cteristics X (1) --(I) Thesite-has' previously been filled and no wetlands` exist op'-slte,,'' 73 I amm"m • e e up to 2,500 permenent new jobs would be generafeo by +me project, ano, as a result, nearly 2,900 additional full-time jobs could be creat*o;6 in.Soutti Florio&, with a $103 million increase in total rages ano S184 Y million in value ached to the regional econaey.? A net.positive fiscal impact of $8.1 million would be.createa by +No project. A rocuction in the growth of regional energy consumption woula result from the energy efficient conservation measures proposeo-by +Nd Applicant for the project. - '. Increess potable rater and wastewater gemend by an average of 415,000 , gallons per aay and generate an average of 42 tons, or 149 cubic yards, of solid waste per aay. h e Increase annual energy use within the Region by +no equivalent or nearly 6.7 million gallons of fuel oil. • Increase the amount and number of hazardous wastes generated on -site. ; • Place additional unfunded.demands upon police, urgency rescue, -and fire services. e Generate•29464 AM and 2.250 PM peak -hour vehicle trips (Miami Centjr existing and proposed) on the regional roadway network and, along wit: other development traffic, reduce levels of service on sigments of t;40 regional roadway network. Recommendat i on Based on consideration of the above speclfied.positive and negative Impacts, it is the recommendation of the Council to the Miami city Commission twat floe Imenoed Application for Oevelopnent Approval for. Miami Center I be APPROVE® subject to incorporation of the conditions listed below into the existing Development Oraer to increase the probability of realizing positive regional impacts ano to mitigate, • 75 +� 1. ^1 S reduce, or eliminate adverse regional impacts. Adoption of a Development Order (00) with a cost allocation different from the one recommended below for construction of transportation improvemments will not be a basis ' for an appeal by the Council, provided that the 00 cow its funding and construction scheduling that ensure the reduired improvements are funded and will be constructed coincident with the project. pursuant to s. 380.06 0 5)(e)2, Florida Statutes. THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY WILL: Bisce)mo Plaza 1. Incorporate the following into the project design and operation to MInimita the cumulative impact of project traffic, ana its associated pollutant emissions, on air quality: • Designate three percent of onosite employee parking spacest located as close as possible to elevator and building entrances, for exclusive carpool or vanpool use. • Actively encourage and promote car and van pooling by establishing a car pool information program. • Provide MetroraiIt Metrobus, and %+rcmover route an* scheoule information in convenient Locations throughout the project. ` to meet the following standards: e Place rip -rap, temporary berms or other barriers to prevent r discharge of construction-relatea runoff to the Say. 7Y e .Construct permanent berms or barriers, at least one foot above ns: grades along the eastern and southern perimeter of the site. • Retsln the runoff from a Zs -year storm on-slte, and construct `ubthe project drainage system in accordance with all 'repro sentations in the ADA. y e Route any and all parking area washdown water through oil and _ grease interceptors to a sanitary sawerline or prohibit any and �_• all washdown or project parking garages. 3, Incorporate into the development, by restrictive covenant and lease or sales agreementss hazardous olnterials accident prevention, mitigations and response standaras. At a minimums these standards shall: e Require that areas within buildings where hazardous materials or hazardous wastes are to be used• generates, or stored shall be constructed wits impervious floors, wit.40ut drains, to 77 4 .,l n ensure containment and focii hate cleanup of any spill or A loeksgo. e Require that the loading/unloading of any hazardous material or } hazardous waste shall occur in a coverea loading/unloading cock { with a spill containment area not connected to the project drainage or sewer system. 4 Prohibit any outside storage of hazardous materials or s hazardous waste. ' Leauire all hazardous waste gonorators to contract with a 4. licensed public or priveto hazardous waste disposal service or '. processing facility and to provide to Once County GERM copies F < of one of the following forms of documentation of proper hazardous waste manDgement practices: - a hazardous waste menifost; - a Shipman+ to a permitted hazardous waste management =, a fecll Ity, or • 4 confirmation of receipt of materials from a recycler or a waste exchange operation. ` • Notify any +errant c°enerating wastes of the penalties for improper disposal of hazardous waste pursuant to Section 403.727, Florida Statutes. 76 -v • Allow reasonable access to facilities for monitoring by the { City, Oace County PERM, and Florida DER +o assure compliance with this Oeveiopment Order and all applicable laws and regulations. For th• purposes of this Development Order, a hazardous waste generator shall be defined as the Applicant and any tenant that falls under a SIC code, listed in Exhibit 1 attached hereto and Incorporated herein by reference, and that uses, stores. or - gon•rstes hazardous wastes. Hazardous wastes are defined as ignitable, corrosive, toxic, or reocfive wastes, including those identified in Exhibit 2; provided, however, that the uses in Exhlblt i and the wastes in Exhibit 2 shall be simultaneously amended upon the addition or deletion of any or all of the listed _ uses* materials, or wastes by amendment t0 the "county Ono Regional waste Assessment Guidelines" incorporated by reference into Rule 17.31.03(2), Florida Administrative Code. 4. Remove all invasive exotic plants from the project site as the s l to A s cleared, and use only those p l ant species sperri f i ep in Exhibit 3 in future project landscaping. _ - - 79 ;- l r S. Have a professional archaeologic+ on•sl+e curing all ear+hwork, notify S+a+e and Coun+y erchaeologis+s of cons+ruc+ion schedules• delay cons+ruc+ton up +o +hree mon+hs in any area where ' po+en+ially significan+ historic or archaeological ar+ifoc+s are uncovered, and permit S+a+e and local his+oric preservation officials +o survey and excavate +he site. 6. Con+ribu+e +he project/ s fair share, as determinea by the City for fire facilities. 7. Collabore+e with City of Miami Fire 0epar+men+ +o ensure +he+ appropriate fire safety measures are incorpora+ad into projec+ design and construction. !!. Collaborate with +he Police 0epor+msn+ to incorporate securi+y. measures and sys+ems into +he design and operation of +he project. 9. At +he request of the City,•wi+hin one year of the effective date = of +his pevelopment Oroar, enter in+o an agrewen+ with the Police Oepar+mon+ +o don+ribu+e a fair share of police oapt+al facilities needed +a resolve Ci+y concerns. and 10. En+er into an agreement with the City +o con+ribu+e a fair share. of capital facilities required- to provide aOequate fire service +o +he project, or, in +he alternative, pay a fair share contribution QA _ - - -fi` any •' p' x � � ..s- 777777T AL -a. . pursuant to an scooted City impact fee ordinance portrining to fire service, if such impact fee ordinance is adopted by the City k4 prior to obtaining final certificates of occupancy for more than 980,000 square feet of development, excluding existing, development, on -site. • 11. Incorporate the following energy conservation measures into +,is ; level opment a. Maximum flexibility of air conditioning systems to cool only occupied areas Can a floor -by -floor basis st minimum). b. Air dlstribution using variable air volume systems, If fessible. • s c. Minimum air conditioning energy efficiencies (EER) of 10.0 in buildings less than or equal to 250,000 square feet, and 12.0 .- t _ in buildings over 250,000 square feet. 4 j; d. Neat producing areas and equipment (cooking, water heating, etc.) isolated from air conditioned areas. . Roe: e. Computerized elevator control system in all structures over 10 stories. i' r _ F J. t. Natural gas or other non -electric energy sources for cooking j" and water heating in restaurantso wnere feasible. Solar water heaters or waste heat recovery units to preheat cooking and washing hot water in restaurantso etc.• where feasible. h. HO water +omperatures set at or below 1059F where allowed by health codes and equipment requirements. t: = 1. Lavatory water flow of 0.8 gallons.per minute or less than f water closets that use no we than three and one-half " f, r. gallons per flush. J. Tinted or reflective glass to reduce the amount of eirect " s sunlight entering air conditioned areas. = k. Light -reflecting and/or light colored wall and roof surfaces. wlth solar absorbtlon coefficlonts less than or equal to 0.50. r I. , Electrical metering on a floor -by -floor basis. m. Computeriaea energy management system capable of start/stop optimization. comand limiting, 1 igh#ing control, and mnel T` control. 82 v. ;i 12. Integrate all original and supplemental ADA information into a consolidated Application for ievelopment Approval (CADA) ano submit two copies of the CADA to the Council. one copy to the City, and one copy to the Florida Department of Cowunity Affairs within thirty (30) days of the effective date of the Development Order. The CADA shall be prepared as follows: a. Where new, clarified, or revised information was prepared subsequent to submittal of the ADA but prior to issuance of the 00, whether in response to a formal statement of information needed or otherwise, the original pages of the ADA will be replaced with revised pages. be Rev isee pages wiII have a "Page Number (R) - Data" notation, with "Page Number" being the number of the original page, - "(R)" indicating that the page was revised, ana "Date" stating the date of the revision. �G 13. Prepare an annual report in accordance with the requirements specified In Condition 27 herein and subunit copies to the Council, City, and Florida Department of Community Affairs on or before each anniversary date of the Development Order. x; JAI AIL 14a. If a public sector financing package has not been committ*a prior to December 31, 1991, then, prior to obtaining any building permits for Biscayne Plaia Phase 11, front-end, which may include arranging loans to, or bond purchases from, appropriate government agencies, S517,000 (1989 collars) to FDOT, based on an equitable reimbursement agreement among appropriate parties which shall specify Interest rates and maturity dates, as the covelopmeWs fair share contribution to the Brickell Avenue River Bridge replacement. 14b. Prior to obtaining any building permits for Biscayne Plaia, in +.e event that construction of the Downtown Bifurcated Ramp system has not begun. fund or construct 100 percent of the Interim roadway improvements identified as AO AM, AU and A(4) in Exhibit 4 (or suitable replacements mutually agreed upon by flow Ci+y's Department of Publk c Works, Applicant, and SFRPC staff), to the City, pursuant to s. 380.06(15)(e)2. Florida Statutes. 14C. If a public Sector financing package has not been committed prior +0 December 31. 1991, then, prior to obtaining any building permits for Biscayne Plaza Phase 11, front-end, which may include arranging loans to. or bond purchases from. appropriate government agencies. ".027.000 to FOOT, based on an equitable reimbursement agreement among appropriate parties which Shall specify interest rates and maturity dates, as the aev*Iopmen+'s fair share contribution to +me Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Remo system. 84 Y.. ts. • Prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy for Phase 11 of Biscayne Plaza, tuna, bono, construct or provide a letter of credit to FOOT for 100 percent of the costs of roadway rtY' modifications, ident(fied by FOOT, Council staff or the Applicant, . r that exclusively serve Biscayne Plaza traffic. 4 - M. Ia. Oeaicate ell easements and rights -of -way which are located on the southern portion of Tree+ 0, Block 1, Oupont Plaza (1.e., +:+e ~ Biscayne Plaza property) which are for Biscayne Plaza and which are ro y P P .� required by the City, County, or State to oroer to construct required transportation improvements, including the Second -level ti pedestrian system, if constructed. THE CITY WILL: 17. Approve no more than the a OW+ of development spec i f ieo by . I end use category in Exhibit S. 1A. As spocitied in Rule 9J-2.239 F.A.C., Identify in the ORI Oevelopmen+ Crder any approved development, including the acreage at+ribu+*ble to each approved land use, open space, areas for preservation, ano green belts: and the s+ructures and/or Improvements to be placed on twe property, including locations, acreages. gross square footage, nunber of units, and other major characteristics or components of the aevelopBen+. 198. If a public sector financing package has not been canmit+ea prior ' +o December 31, 1991, withhold issuance of any building permits for Biscayne Plaza Phase 11 until +tie Applicant front-enas, whien may include arranging loans to, or bond purchases from, appropriate government agencies, S317,000 +o FOOT pursuant to Condition 14a. 19b. Pursuant to s. 380.06(13)(e)2. Florida S+e+u+es, withhola issuance of Certificates of Occupancy for Biscayne Plaza until all interim road lmprovemen+s identified in Exhibl+ A are constructed. Y� �S 20. If a public sector financing package has not been co mi++ed by December 31, 1991, withhold .issuance of any builaing permi+s for the Biscayne Plaza Phase II until +he Applicant has front-enaec, which may include arranging loans +o, or bond purchases from, appropriate government agencies, S3,027,000 +o FOOT pursuant to Conditlon 14c. V . withhold issuance of any certificates of occupancy for +tie Biscayne Plaza Phase If portion of the projec+ until cons+ruc+lom has c*wenced on (i.e., upon execution of a contract for cons+ruc+lon of) +tie Downtown Distributor 81furcatea Ramp system. • 86 T I - 22. Issue a.ORI Development orw in accordance wita the following criteria: a. The OR Development Order shall specify: . • The name of the development. The name of the developer. The authorized agent of t11e deralopar •- f :• A statement that: -The Apo l lcat ion for Development ' Approval (ADA) is approved: or • The ADA is approved subject -to canditions, Spec Ifying a the conditions: or s The ADA is denied, specifying the reasons for genial and changes in the development proposal, if any, +Me+ would make it eligible to receive a oevelopkent approval. be findings of fact aft conclusions of Iry addressing whetyer and the ex+ont to which: Q7 i ' ,'1 •. The aev•lopnent unreasonably interferes with the achievement of the objectives of an adopted state Jana development plan applicable to the area; ano ` The development is consistent with the local Iona 4r development regulations ana tye adopted local comprehensive, plan; and • The development will be consistent with the racone+envations of the Council OR I Assessment pursuant`- toy Subsection 380.0601), Florida Statutes. ,} xA 0 The asvelopment makes "acsauate provision for the public b. facilities neNdea to accommodate the impacts of the ' proposed aevslopmtnt" or the City commits in toe Sri Development Order to provide the$• facilities consistent F • Mith the approved CR I development schedule. ys a ''c A legal aescrlption of the property including acreagei: 23. Incorporate the Consolidated Application for Oevelopment Approval, as revised pursuant to Condition 12, by reference into the Oevelopment Order for Miami Center as follows: 48 . r r "T',e Consoliaated Application for Development Approval Is Incorporated aerein by reference and rolled upon by the parties in discharging their statutory duties under Chapter 380, Florida Statutesi, and local ordinances. Substantial compliance with +ne rooresentatlon s contained in the Appl icatlon for Deveriopnent Approval is a condition for approval unless waived or moaiftea by agreement among +tie Council, City, and Applicant, its successors and/or assigns." 24, Incorporate the Council CRI Assessment by reference into the Developnent Order, provided, however, that nothing set forth in the Council CRI Assessment or in the irADA shall be binding in any way upon +he owner of "Miami Center existing" (+he northern, developed portion of Miami Center I consisting of the Pavilion Hotel, the Edward Ball office building and garage, and associated uses), its successors and/or assigns. 25, Provide that the effectiveness of the Development Order shall be stayed and no developmen+ pe units thereunder shall be granted, until such time as an Amended ADA, providing updated information, • is submitted +o the Council, City, and State and an Amended Development Order issued, if Biscayne Plaza Phase I is no+ under constructlOn or built within 3 years from the effective date of +no Development Order. Should the Development Order be stayed pursuant to thls..CWW I+ion, nothing herein shall be construed to Iimlt Condition 29 below the+ +his Development Order mats with +he land, and its terms and Conditions are binding on the Applicant,'i+s.' successors, and/or assigns. 84 t 26. Designate an official to monitor compliance with all conditions of the Development Qraer ana specific monitoring procedures that, at a minimum, rectuire: e Development Order conditions to be reviewed by the City prior to issuance of any local development permit, and for any condition that cannot reasonably be monitored as part s. of the local permitting am inspection processes, a notarized affidavit from the Applicant assuring compliance with suc.4 ; Development Order conditions to be Included as part of thef annual report required by Condition 27 herein. L;s3 .•ems 27. Reou i re that • an annual report be submitted to the Counc i I . City, and OCA on each anniversary of the effective ante of the { Development Order, which report shall include• at a minimum:. a. A complete response to each Question In Exhibit 6. b. Identification and description of any changes in the plan of development, or In the representations containeo in the ADA, or in the phasing for the reporting year and for t;tie next year. f _ t _ U I OWES" MINWISPR", of ""Is" 1 ac+i v ity proposda and W%wl IV t4w +am year. t : d. lawifica+ion of undevelo tracts of land, other than Individual single family lots. +ha+ have been sold +o a separate entity or developer. e. ,Identification and intended use of lands purchasedt leases or optioned by +he developer adjecen+ to +he project site since the Oevelopeen+ Order was issued. f. An assessmw+ of +he AppIicon+s and +he local government s Comp1lame with +he CONI+ions of approval con+aineo in +tie ail Development Order and the comimi+men+s which are contalnio In the Application for Oevelopmen+ Approval. g. Specification of any amemed CRI Application for Development Approval or rmts+s for a subs+an+ial deviation determination that were filed In +he reporting year and +o be • filed during +he max+ year. a h. An indication of a change, if any, in local governmen+ jurisdiction for any portion of +he development since issuance of the Developmen+ Oroer. 91 1-' • '� 9 �- } i, w }.. .Y.i .•£., a- ..aaid-ti•~ZTi". �.'�_ _ ••ter•-=�,^' I _ i_iY.e' i. A Fist of signiticant local, state and federal permits which have been obtained or which are pending by agency, type of permit, permit number, and purpose of each. �. A statement tha+ all persons have been sent copies of the annual report in conformance with Subsactions 380.06(14) "a (16), Florida Statutes. It A copy of any recorded notice of the adoption of +M0 Development Order or any subsowent modification that was recorded by the Applicant pursuant to Subsection 3EO.0604)(0), Florida Statutes. 1. Copies of one of the following documentations of appropriate. disposal of all hazardous.waste: • si d hazardous waste menifest, _ • a bill of lading from a bonds* hazardous wes+e transporter indicating shipment to a licensed hazardous paste facility, or t' • a confirmation of receipt of material from a recycler, a. .` waste exchange operation, or other permitted hazardous waste management facility. 92 - Y°'�1.,"rki m. Any other information required by the Department of Community — •Affairs (OCA) in accordance with Section 380.0604) and (16). Florida Statutes (1985). • CODE FOR WASTE TYPES COM40M'.Y ASSOCIATED_ WITH EACH SIC 1HD'_STRY A Waste pesticides a Washing and rinsing, solutions containing pesticides ; C` topty pesticide containers 0 Spent toxaphene solutions or sludges from dipping L Spent pesticide solutions or sludges other than toxaphene from dipping F Dust containing heavy metals C Washings and rinsing solutions containing heavy metals N Wastewater treatment sludges containing heavy metals 2 Waste ink Ignitable point wastes containing flammable solvents (flash'poin loss than 140'T) - K Liquid paint wastes containing heavy metals (cadmium, chromium. morcury or lead) L Spent solvents M Still bottoms from the distillation of solvents N Filtration residues from dry cleaning operations : 5, 0 Cyanide wastes ! Strongly acidic or alkaline wastes C Spent plating wastes S Waste ansonia S photographic wastes ? Ignitable wastes (flash point less than 14010 0 Wastewater sludges containing pentachloraphonol, ersprote,°or :. arsenic t V feast* foraraldehyde • W Lead -acid batteries #: X Waste explosives F. s,. f' Y Waste oil 1: F 2 Other '1 LIST Of IPOTEMTIAL MONO S WASTE CME"TOSS n SIC CODE* SIC West@ Type• vest •ireise SIC Wave* .types Nscripg!« roar code Goss -MI; A6111C LT moolows «d shove wt•1 was sots Lt Class sod Classes Wass Slots AK Cote IIK L1W fagavNoas and gonadal ion tress 10#11 AK gores Iwo JRLMV Spacial food* Cower«tat• Of li AK fobaces stet AK Swe•s •refs 20/2-39": MA1WfACIVAING ImuslRIR1 GI41 AK V@selobte ad Males farmer lot to AK Rattly Cow, :G/? Camara Specialties 0114 AK Citces fswit Grans. 10011 Ceased and Cased foss and Staled. fill ASC Gsaamsalal lissicaltoce ♦ seeattf tradsesm jail L4 stood Waom rebels $lolls. wool �• sell AAC C@ovess fors@. esie+ssilr Crop sM LM Y•wtws full L•npts and Rae basivey, sill AAC Reef cattle feedlots list Am Mosi*ov. *scope woeos•s full Lomg•s A lye -wets " Giil AK Real Coleco, esters foodless 1*.e.. taacbsal also LM sail Ortesu@ae Milos _ Gtei AK Sbeep sod Goas farms 22s4 LM Rail IA..iteatat Moils site AK Cameral Livestock also Sol Clrealse note Uboic hills lffl ASCII Soil ys*pstoll« Services 1!18 L's Wagp gait roboic sellie s►11 AKf cop rlamlias. Collivalles. sad fteleetiame list in smillime nails. me: Wit 8,01/1 Coe# 11oreessing. ralseeily by N"bie* 1.661 let finishers of Reeod Yov*o robrice s1 Cate« GtI• . f caller clawing 11e1 LM fimiss@e• of Snood 11"Ve foisics of Mam-Made file AT Goners! Cost Services fiber "a ails Gtsl A Liw*otocb Segvicee. *start Service• lot Amlmss 1149 L11 fiaisset• of Rtosd Yves fabrics. Ism -Made rsbeo Specialities ad So Ilk stet w Lew a" Gordon, Setvicea fall 11 Wave• Corpees.644 Roes •eel AT Oessosemsso "rob a" tree Services 11N LM tubed Cottage and Gras also too Carpels and Rrps. me soil -"So: rOKSM FAN JRLI Wad gascbew Cabinets 24Is JRLt Gaodwsa Tester and Firuwed ! AK f&m►ot fleets 14/e JRLI $solved Veweet sad rlywead MIt AK ; fare•t sbrearlee ♦ free Seed Gotlerles ♦ 24s1 Jglf Mobile No«• faessetims 14s1 JRL1 helobtieased Wood suildiagg and Comp~s/+ sell AKT fseastor Services 14-91 1 Wad heserviss ( 1491 LIT yet Iitlebosea Jn sell -It": CMSTN"tott Isis JRL%1 Waal ttorstbol4 ratwitree. *stops upbeat. 4 - t114 GLoyp Nelsl tlswsebld rasaitaee a !e#1 1.1'WR sitba•y a" Street camal"welogo fill JRL11 Weed Tr a" 0441io Csbiorts Ibis town Dredge. Vassal. ad II*vat*/ nisMrslp Coomttectl« alit JRL'll Ibusessld fmowilace. Kc fill to plaslisl. Malie$ tescert tsecolitl sad Air Isis J51.41 Weed Office retailers Cesditiowins Isis 111~ Morsel Office ragwitase lial JRL1 psiesiss. Vapor pandas. ad Gecotatses. Moor 2141 JRIMI Wald restitiess ead rineve*a Cos•1rar1&«. KC 1142 wor" 1o1a1 ►aglitiems and pieces*• 4141 of teeraaes. tile. llsobse..a" classic Warb 24/1 Lern pulp wills t list Iou float Lsylas sad ,Ogles fsessmosb, Me: 1611 LWIV Favor 4ille. facers soildiag popes ~ills. .2611 Lmn rapeebosed wills F .tote swaaetrr Fes be@* #Aces&#iea a• * Ls►eemtisl generator S# bo•otd«o Was 2"1 ILr rapes Costisa sad Closes ors ela !allots slat she *adastrly osy *#"#*Ie geologies. reactive. isssrable. 1K1 Up sees. Incept Itself@ sego - s"lag ,son'cLa'"c •. #sere*asp14. SIC rd@-sill. Sail tooretasies services. Isis Itr Itsr-Coe lsptt and rapeebosed and QseJboa1! o ie s<. trlttal * g**et*tot of tourer lynageigidt orastee. foal SIC cede listed i4 34466 _ llr revsged sea welded rrlp Q1949 fervor ! iaso- **@*$wooly lava dawaoewstd -aft I%* lstetatase as. a-tN��ts�1 2si:• err Crw+•toad rap•• awd.raa•rebro.d ►owilocos. MG *ess@s44as, rf-lbasotdoas 00411o. 14461 11.10 lmldswa ►sprsbw•ed floss• I61! ler See -up Pap•esaa.l are•. + - p*W14 oleo t!•ewbett cl�•sified - 100 i1"r lostugser.l and Saisd !sore gns•s tic Waste Tyree Mastlpllaa sic Valle Tjpvs rtss�iN iee Cede CeM 1411: WORDS" No" and Eye Toole. Escape Machine Tools sea 3`161 NLV" Ale a" Cos Coapre•sets sand So" 1161 NL'Mitq clones sod Lehoees vratilatien rest K24aLnww need Some 6 oar D/sass 1%1 NL`NWW Industrial peetees retwoce 6 Oven* 14!V N#AwpQ1 Novdeset. KC 114E NL%. Ww N#chooic•r tovef graawaetaM t tie --. � /+ewe , M I&it NLsootpQ Eaeevlel Ilse not Ne/el saaltety Mato 116E aullupQi Central sailmoolial Mathiwety a" tltieparw/. as € 1412wisom pleahi" flataes Fittings and Tois /Dress Cosa*) 1191 NLMM tlecoleaic ca+•po/e64 tysipe►wt All NLNDM Neeliag E/eirwat. *scope tlecollc And Vats Ail strip NLosltpQ Caltolatiwg • Actooeweiwg Nawioes, •seep purotscea tlaNvsaic Ll•seperwo 144E le42 NI.Imm Nt/tllpF�4 Oabticatei strectetral skeet Net*I Doors, Seek. flows, Ihidlese. se/ Trier Isle 1st? Now" aview g Office Ilsehioes. A1/ Co arocial Lseadov. Ore Cleawiag. sal Feestaws 1`4i 1NMOpQa Fo6siceed PIlet Vert Nachiea$ s444 tILMORIiT She*# metal Not! 11pS NL*Vo Air c•adilisning and Ysre Air Ntaliwa $pip 1s44 eNrtttl�QT Architectures eel Oreneeaesl Nrtas Mat% and Cowfcisl sod Iw/vollisl oteloipes•eu.. ic4l Nt/11o1'QT prefabricated Metal ctiildiess see Cut poaeaoe Equipment 1646E tIGo1 Qg Niecellaaesee Nresl Met% IM6 116.1111" "*$Sofia$ sal Dispessiss poops ! 14s1 NLSKKW Sere" Norhioe Pfedticce 1004119 ISM" f*tgict Iwieslty Mechewe•. SIC 1412 I*AOM colts. Not*. scfews, pivots, led Vashets Isla NLMWW Catbef•sefe. piston*, Fieoea otiose • tole#• 14W logmmw T tear a" $test Forging* Isle NLWNQg 11whiworp. Escape Elecevicol. KC 146E NLOWQT Aoetowliee steeping$ bl: IN'N►/og toot. Disl/ibwliow sad specialty Toaasfdere• 14*9 NIINNQT Skeet Sa•episgs, NEC 1401 NL'N" Seilahgeso and Switchboard Apperole• IeRI IIt1N►r®i Elacerspineiq. hiiNiag. Hallam. Aeadisleg. 1611 Kmeq maeer* • Ceeetatoos _ aul Coletieg 16:1 NLNOtQ ladesolial Coastal$ Iro1l NC11DlQT Costieg. Esgeeeiwg. sea Allied services. Inc I•as ULM" welding Appecaltie. Elocoric Utz Small Arm Aammoilien 1614 4~9 Corbett • clophile ®.elect* � �t1 Awxewisieo, *scope for Leah Arse, NEC 162E NLIIINQ tlac/ricol Is/woeial Apper*aw. NEC •so Isotl Otdwsnce sea Acceosories. NEC I612. ELM" meusthela m#/riaetasoce sod Now sea rose /rp#stir• a I41i NLNWQ $teas, cal. sea srdreefis Tet/lses 3616 NL NNfQ Eltsltis Notistwofe• oo/ gsas [41l NLNIMoQT Isarraol Caebeetise tegie*e. DEC 1414 NL'NIrQ Swing machines Is21 NLN T revs Machinery aN talofipoteat 1610 No.". " Nastehald Appliances. KC 1pa4 IIEtMeFQT Coedsw Tractor* 6 Lem • Cordes 1"Isaent IKI NLosot►Q Electric Loops Is1i NLNwgv eateseaction owbioefp ate Elelpaent 1441 Kill" Cartage-coreyimt hire Device* I412 -t1LIMW99 Hieing machinery a" speipetat.-aeKapt NI field 16411 NIINNQ sesidestiol electric Lighleag Fixatives Isis NLU"w Oil riot$ Mschioeep sod tivip*at 1646 NLM M Coeeeociol. ladeeoeisl. and Iaelitoliesisl Iles Cangerose a" Congeries Clairmont Light iap l esseee* sass I1R111 T Inlsettia/ Trnt6e, Ttsctore, Tcalless, sad Nit tll.!IOFQ 1lehiculat Liphoinn gl.eipsrwt - ttacbete least at"" media • Televesion mecelvesg.3e10 Iitl NLt16eFQB Naeheiw* Tools. Nesol Cwtlag N1! NtINtIQ phonograph Records god rse-soceNrd tlapa►oic gap* It42 VIUKIP lT machine Toole, skeet refsing N•a VlA*9 Lurie sad Television Tteesailliag. Saswalias. owl IS44 W6"* QT Special site a" Tsels. sin soon, Jose aN Otaecliou Elsipewas sad Appefolee E; Fiwlores. and fadti*triel Noids 1614 UM" s*sicsw/ecoers and gels$#d Devices 11 % #Affler MasAiae Teel �fteto•oties • IMsnotiat Devices 161% Ego" Eiecossaic copeceloes -st46 aglow -%acre Dsivge Nood Tools 1411 NUN/r" Elsrlsosic Coals. Trse*loosen. sod Other lodectwfe -AS40 t i1Lr#w" Metal Nochieg Machinery. NEC 1410 NLNOIQ tive/sonic cospawpols. sic _ t Me . ,. -11tsoww toga Vendetta Mschiwttr ell NpyY S/etase otaslerias -,l�sla U+ltis* N•fhieeap 1491 ION priasey Uslttees. Ofr owl sls0 Ttsl :. Ntllsrerg _lasndsasbieg.11schiaery fill Notes vaherl#s awd rassrwppf Car se/se• 1R1 lN•1MsrQg - Apgtp#e7.,fa{st*#ties Mochinery I114 IVAM"t No.lot vehicle tools old Aotrssaeers MlsN+trM !'b lfsIR114- ,,Tsadte Itakaoeey sad Epipsvao 10"Solf i116 Nl1MN4 lowof Ilo.wr• Spaxi•i mathomply.,Kc tool tmeletpq 4e444sl0 Y ,1 ,lotars,Sod roorifte"#%*ifs as TINS NlNAM Aieifoll lasiae• Rod laptop pests • ot i 4" selts#_Ik*##mp* PCs in#ewp Astfoalo tales eel Aaseieser t'uepwrwe. Nit KAEt« snl�q.�rlor«�ere..elase}teed. .:Nit •.;MNozri•.vhrorclssse/epd 6 .. .,.. .. ... :... �..': , �.,. ' .. t.._.e v."....� ..a«Ii.SH�ufi^ �Lb l�••#^J?%.. 4i: J. ',.. _. j ,• w. ...,....�....»� ..,,, _. r„ , sic *"to lyre• fteerofeiN sic, Wages TWO seecosftsse Cab Cwfe Caleb /LR! sseisirf took co"oiwact 1111 L. mwole L So" Cat Stoeb L fidiogs 1st$ can fiber Coos. lrbte. Moms. sad 111biler Aod•c.le Doll L Lvathes Cloves L olsolves 141461 Lewis /ai/diss raper new soitdios 11"fa Ililso is" L wsraoe fsesatde. *agora Albloti# tM MILOh+ Meseo~#*. fbblisbiws rod rel"I" /10 L wdmsse . IM MoLf" fesiodecole, lobliobias i P#Melse loll L wwea•* ftil"sas L Powers Dolt so"" seeks: p"liabise; sea fcMtlst pot; L ►eraseat I.eatmlH Coeds 1F11 MILWQ took frlot is$ is" L Lesekvr Ceods. Ka: Ii'll 4I44100 Commercial decolies. Lellelow"10 WO mer•N Ml /i Clot codes bill Miia Commercial Rsiatlag. Litkasraf►ie IM J/L stick and Steaeteeal Clay loot . tfst 01:41001 sosesei a a" foals fti$Aiss Me AL CagNic Well swr /last isle, IF" MILwq Commercial "feliog. newels@ 1M1 l/L wasseso• Chia& ►loabsaa #$asset• awA sd•tiseea ; f4i M1tut Mswsosld masisess Ears* Acussaies 5 rfAl MOLD C#istosss Casa fvlDislis l'A! ML. listeoas Chins labo• anA /i#ebes allies-& Mt NILWQ slseskbeabe. Loeeeleel siolero. sod M.le•• 1`4I JmL. teal. ldrlbosweare $Vhaoeaaeol labor L /alskre Mf 11116.4" maetbledias Soo met*Ier ysrk AL article* Porcelain 11t41gieol S.o"lies 1pot 1I'"l l AlbdliEs oar CbIsaias 1?19 J/L !site#► (redacts. KC silk 1t>►1 s.atgsalie Risweuso INN t Abessive hdreas poll tOPWI Industrial Inocsawie Cbemleals. sot Ial Li Caskese. ►•ckisf and Sealia/ srvices 1/tt LM1t plastic*. Motorist*, s►otbetie mediae, sea loll 1 Giese faoodeoe. Sleet Yetis, ad mellisf still• Mae-vrscesi*able lteetomeea sits 1 111e61#eareallarfaces ►teJases 1s11 LIM sr"besie sabbtr Isis 1 51d01 wage scoaess sea Swot Mails and Spikes MI Liss► Woollosic Mow -lisle fibers 11N 1 Cold mooted Steel Sheen. stair. ad saes 1s1ss LMfI¢ s►elbelea dwoesie fibers. ••cafe Call.lNie loll 1 $"etl ripe e04 lobes 1s11 sisligetsl rradsess loll 1 seat lose feawdeses 1931 Modlcssalo od sesooicals Isis 1 Malleable lose /swwJtecs to 1* LR Pberewsolical rtefstatiswe DIl1 1 Steel lwdaars. Mil' )a t 1Lt/l1 Seat sea global stserssems, soceft mfseialler loll 1 rrimaly Ses.lsawf dnd •oliwiss •1 Lear Cleooere post 1 Ptirty Swtlsior awl blesses •1 #sac 7641 &L.am mfeciolsy Cle*aers, hli*bds, sag mNit•tiN 1113 1 Poiweat ►eodactase of towniwaw Psowatis** Ills 1 - ►they Seeps mr, 404 toe/*sins si moleeews lmtl fLM11 Sortoce, Active Assets. 1'iatsbiss Assets. "et•1•, MWr srolaasioi glsls. sod Assistance 1K1 1 Sesealaef Sorltiwo'dssA molewisg el Mseleoows ld�tt PL11 Pe#isames. Cosssalkete me Mber Taoist frefaresi"o metals lost ► more? foist sod •lose! f#odscls list IIIJ Mal mollies. !#owing god lsstadiog so tippet MI LMf11 cam sea Now Cloomicets DIS/ MLiMWV Alaainaa Skews. Pont* sad foil A•t1 t C►elit owes fall Crsides. me crelie latenrdidtes. 11141 Kam Aluminum Wedded frodoces Ayes, sod lOesdoic fisaeeso 1Labse seed feel•$ loll M1"s►41 Alwsiaam selling and seevies. KC lgkf IJMI.6 /aaaoseie/ dkssaie-Cbtwicels, etc I116 ML'MMat sallies. sraaist sod taeawioag of Nualeoows MIR - Ililtsstwaas terNtiset• Wrest. Caceft Caret ad Alswswo 1 #I}"p Am[L/if festa#i1EE. od Agrfsaltres/ secede. msC Dist sukery staaiss sad lesalat ins of Maw/ea#ws yore :Teat: Arbeaieeo red sealant• 1161 1 Atawieve revd#its Icaociessm 1s�EiT la�loseees 1162 1 seats. m#segt. Copper and Carrot gee• Allow ' 1!CmJI� friwlsas sleek fewwative .Is j"It too," Chemical fiefaratiese _ 1161 1 Monottroaa foawdeoes Itaelists/. 011C iatiiL:. E ►ssseloan.Nelswits, ills Mleear" "Meal Most ier•eono ;` AafAott felt• ad-Csseloss. loll MINOM Poirot "real ►e.sAocle. net fNL Risk+sssttwg Ms La,ewd IGrEaaes ., ►owilae"lo'aE .feo#arl ew-.arc CMI. we lab 1.1! MLMslQr MUMHIIf "real !sal• "alai Sha►piws wears•. sows, /r►s. and Nel• stiff olene#tsea ft-iRsi4,"Moslem Ihsna acme«boors»*1 1t1# i"teobea sensing a" ffsoisisaals Itl1 I"OWQ votlip ar ,t sResAsess c4asr d . ,, � , _ ., �. � - r > . Mot:.• sh.t�al•►si.ii sinssiofsei - -,,.. :.. ,..,...., ..,., .. . . .. n.. r• ,.+ .... ..... ...a3. .... t..:.. ,.. k.......s_ lt.. •Fir +i k-k. ..... ....1 .. ,. ..C. .. _,... .... ,_ .. .. -... .. _ .... .. .....r...�. .... .. . '.'n a ::7r+, r .a r_... Fi: .... ., _ .. ... =• el sic Waste Types, flestslpt law SIC Wide fire@• Me SIC tFt vain €e_dp Cads Sill sL www Ship Saildius and Nepaitims 411/ f Alt Tganse@cessisa. Ceteilscased Corsi@$% My Ntomm asset ftvildies "A Nte@ilime" awl T Airports and $films Floods salt sub" tagimeering. Scientific. Lowwatotr a" Naaeweh 4101 t" ta+nEtwe+sl9 Air ltv 4601 Jett" Cgs" reliefc»mpLee*$ . k Satz NLlM" Aatoeflic Controls tot ae uissithe ietiUNties and u11 Jatf1T befoned fetralpOM Pep loops comweelal taeiesnrata amd Affliance-6 4619 JaLty Pipe Lines. WC Salt stm" sedaa®sies faagromoests for Memorises. Mitplar. seed 4411 LT Telephone Commmocesion !Wire se aodisl Camtesl of #faces# Variables. sad Misled 4411 LT Nadia Droodsesesny Product* 4991 Lf Ielevisios ataosaestine Bate NLNWQ Taealiting fluid Meters aN Commies Devices 4111 1 Electric Ser•ig*% IfIS NLORWO lestrooseto fee lesssxrlal and Tostime us 4911 f Eloctoical 4 Oshet Sperices tsectrieier anal tltaerit ;igmols 4911 T Get 4 Olher Ser•ices lade ULM" glossaries a.ei comes/list !.sins.. NEC . 49" f Combinotsom Utilities. KC Mt isUM Optical leatemmeats anal tosses 4111 T $.worst* Sleeves 3 Ba.E seJMN"Q Surgical and Medical laseeweaes sea Anstatsa 49f1 f a*fuse Sleeves lief NLIIQpQ 4411►op*4it. 1`80011hetie. and $selitat Applissets 49S9 A1Kf Sani/sgr Seeviees. N[r fad Se"lies I�1 NLNOpQ Memra/ Egeipasne sea Alas SMI-Sill: Wae't[SAE[ IVAb[ I01 stdNIFQ Ophthalmic Goads #1141 NLNA/9 fhalosraphic Eseipmet 000 $appllto She/ T Ncrop a slaw* Materials. wholesale MI m mm Wseches. Cloche. 'see. $141 LpTT Chemicals and Allied readoclo Molesslt ` 81e11 sLnom Jawfir. frecioeo Nte*$ slot A fern► Sopplirs Met NIINI/Qi Sslvega.ere, Plated Were. sea $taimitao stool Were !IN JELT foists. racxishes. sad Shirtless Be1S 161Lt1Of$. Jtwoser°a findings a Nateviels a Lspidser Yaeh 1a41 Nltttlea/Q coolant Jeweler a" Coolant /lwaltisa. •sort Slll-Se04: a[TAIL TaAOE n Precious Nis/el 19641 Nll6ilm" mesdlta, piss, Nods OW area, sod $let er S:tl Jatf point. Class. end Wallpopeg Slog*r wlisas l:11 AAT Nardusg* sear*a 1"I MISM teaFQ Sisaa sad Ad•ortleles Misplays slog Jatp Mail* leer boat*ts E1+1S Nitum" series Cootie sill sent Msparemral Stores "tat untmomr6 t amosetasing fodsatrlea sm AIJaT Niscelloaeoxs General N*tebomilI Stor*o 4MI/-4lS1R: TUM MIATINII Jift PWIC INTILIMS Sills Lwi motor vehicle besiege fuels, • Needs We tmf Moser vehicle Dealerr Word Onlfl 44t€ JaLTT Mallesads. Lis*-Mmi Operating 1111 Lis Aulo a Nome Seapplr Stages 4911 LMf Local and 16mberbse Transit 11:1 lief$ Gaaalisrs Stevies Suliens. Netail 401`1 MIT S.itchiag 4 Terminal lotahllohmemes Me L/YT Neat beotegs Mt LP" Local i*ease+get teaeopereatiaa, KC lf11 trw Nalagcycle Dealers MIS &my Ttoicaae' 11ee LFWT Aolonative besiege KC 41 # tpMLt gmllsciet OW $hems Nilwar Pasoeyse sill Noasehold Appliance Stages. leemil Temopertstiem $vat LT Axtoaalic Mesehandisiss slochsr Opcealer• 4M trw Schaal Sooes lead T fool 4 Ice beoless 41f1P T nsielsooftes 6 T"sevico Tocilitlea tag hoes. wel►icle 11N! T fool oil Besiege aes+e:astr TransRsctotiam lea: T Liquefied /et.elove Cos Dealers alit JaLAtT Lalrsl Teaeaisg leitLHrmt !latest 11t1•NW1: Sfavif[S Imusia/IS . �E " 41t;1`" slLtllelt womebinM. astafu Local ---- ------ '4t It Ja14'f A! L.oI ltas4teg mile Storage I111 IN Coin lepetst.d Is»aad.aro sxd for Clp«.iq 4l{I 11tplllE. Tt+tthis$, lerwrinsil facimito Ilia IN Nr Clesooas /leas•, #nac/e 311 flesxons ' z AO OaLlttt} e.S 'fsital Service Ivrloicl* moistens"# "III foil iN flops sad uph,.lse..t 4'41'l "' ;.: Meer enei�ts`llaasPogeatian 11I11 IN I«d»oil/eat 1.a»xaetits :, tesrisie�'eeisae 11ind1iaea looks LT towp.al S.artaa axJ Covis eaters :III Wdtt ltaol pNesilisw $eitltea, we' fill Idalf eeasdxrs Alr.as.se«F Scsraaa K -� 11 F rri sRl to@iK %1/ Nis` • Iwt •/seYhrrr.alaasidled poop.-...x _, f :. �'" :...—':: ... ."' r^;,.. " . "_ .'...'. .',-. .. .... .. .. .... .. ... .. .. 1. :,. }.. ... . .,._ .:.T.""i .. V. ... A•1` IF..Y-,..1 .. poop.—. poop.: �Mc sec wool@ 'types iesttlptian SIC haste types Mocflµ Sam Cad* — coat flit tog Ado*rtisies, etc 9411•6e99: Nlsctttaft"s 1I01 tu -firect stall aee#rtioiss services fill tot slutprist a" "Atoce"ins Sorvicts NII A APT Maseems and Art Callefieo f1t1 Lot commercial Ph"686e01 Art, a" Grsolte NTI ASC Acheloos, sotesicat evil taolosicel Careens F14t ACK iieiel*ccias see Satermisetiem Services itl7 WIN 110scomme#cial ttuaetionsl. sciesti/icy and - f!i♦ silt Cleaning a" 41sisfemssco stroicee t• wollieSs seseatci Gossetsetieas sad Meer suitdisss, SIX sR S*#vices. SIC fool LtT "search nee it+elepeet taaesteflte in$ SIMST sfetolisiabiis telsretetiH r"I tt1 Commercial Testims Laboratories . Flit Wart sstsosristwe ehersime Services pill MY resoessor Coe Rental mmA Leasing. wltswt raisers psi I MY Truth ftstal age Legal@$. •!these Massa Ff1t LpM it[/itt Italics soil "ctesliasel vehicle Ssmtai t4tR Rh6 Tel see sect impair sass, Avtometivt - tilt LOW Tire "tfte/iss sae "poir shss, Am/sm"190 pits LFM hint Sala. edMsmwcise Fl/s LPIFI Geneses Automotive Repair Hwgs Pllf RM Avtwotive Repair sees, Sot - faFF Rat wise, s Television bevels shape ibis LR�T s*/rises®ties A Air Conditiesiey•Wfvlee s "pair shop Tisfe LPT Mcttical A Electronic "psi# loss. Sot I611 LT Malebo Clorb, sae Anode, Sosir •u 1041 MRT sahay"letor4 see rocmifefa "pelf .. -. - IM LVO tltleins "pail 1694 tT Armelere beriwdlas she" fats tt "pair saps sad Related services. its ' Ilmclodias ta,idtt+siAb1 - lost M Services Allied to Notion ►krone rrasereles fill ALT Mratfical 01ee11ctfa centers eentIM ritsarNl emf ' Niste/lewewo taNfieal Ssfvieta �",; #tot AK '"of Coure*o toll LPT Cois-spersted Aweemsl iesicee fees ASLrT Aewe*meot larbe 19e9 &Al; Anusesenl and "cfestism services, SIC elssf LR'T Ceaecei ihdical a sarsicil "lease "69 LRFT .,Speciostp llospitols. escape A/chisteie im►1 UPI ' 14eical teisfatwriet "Ps LIRT info?$ tobvestecive . *mst LPT Oelpitieoc Care iaclsilles iAlt•t1t1 ISKATIONAL MINIM tll N&C • SW oles"Wee classified . 0114 ASLIt liemewtor,T,ems S*cosdsft School* - n u!i !Si T Cslloses. scans:raioi*e. lse/eeelsssl seheela, , ..� °-mac-- "-••---- - .... :,, �. ;t ,.- _ � ,.: .., _ �i W 777777 lirtellfa �oiossa ISlih oast �I�r.al ,N.• IirewglNwll - story for" Ira0 net ter resldawllal wo. hslwclsse NlcMrrlso 40aart poiwclewel Gvelecum sanctum 11.19s m vital h*sdsphomla sergosfll 41rlorids cherry #Dios lion cossiwe Mahone hasty$ ►/ychotperoa slogews ISesfrolhls palol Jwrsede ec011lellas Iloceranda$ MTchosperea oacrfhwrll IfIecArther Palo) iealparss sllllclfmle ISowtherw red cedar) Qwrcos elrslwiwa Illva oil hrrgladeadroa farrow Mack, Iremmedi Mlsopswrs oang/a IIa1 mengro+el . _ togerstrosels ladicas fOrep-N/rrtle/ "too" Glass 111o161 poles tegancelerla rageeose fiblta oawprerel Iloystawss reds Icohew royal palol ticargo frtawdra flelt IhrIN Wol pslealto IGhhgs poled ifcoa/a grawdlso ftfcwels palest Sresos repass ISO+ pelarllol ttcssis spp.* Itic sts pals/ Slorewhs glows Warodlss frond tl►sllsws ►esesws�iEs/s Iplld IeaertMl p Selateals mahogawi coast ladles mahogany$ tyslloos Ea/Is1E,ra IIIE/d fraGrlw/1 Tahohols rgewteaa ftra of gold$ fiawilkre bahaeewsts (Hold dlllyl . Tehahsls pollidae Irish trumpet treat Masfichodandron Post/dlsslaas Obelkl Tewerlodes ladlcae Ilwdle Tawerlad) Mersa ieyha /dos flhwewa6 Tsrmlwells colapso $Tropical almosds *price critrs, fSeelhers we myrtle) Toaodlum /Cyprassl Prkiwsowfa aceleste• lJrsaslsw thorwl !swarms Thespasls popelwaa /rorfio tree. seaside mehoel Nrllophsrra fiwaroaa IVOIIOe pslwclswas lhrlmew worrlsl! Ilcoys thatch polo/ - -Fors esswss ISGnd Floss Thelsoa pervlllors IThatch palm/ ''°� /riwn� mttlmiit i�l�.k �iri t�rl�re rrl�ia irierid iviA �.i�i _ i i C t I ,.1 • ti r Serrhst wines, awe MOM" tarsi• Cestas sm. 1-spores flags 0ltfogthece herchoweesa free so ore11s1 looione" viscose IEerelsA le•11 - Acelnhe hlsplEse damallle PIMtt Ooeh•re aeltochll free& ha111 Acelphe wilhes/Mee lem" oe"s Eroot►Mee ervosrs• folio 9p01 Aoocesie Mo. IElsphest owl . Is a IIe s1oppE►Fel• as111ee Atpl«le spp. Isbell mver,l EeoMl• confess filed herrrl AeeAlrss Isarcw gloWl EoEMI• lostods ISEMIsh soopperl Arilsis (l•Mele lChroson" owl) hale Impale Nrtoodos Ispealsh staffers AsWoovs We. IAspsrors 1sreo ieros/l•re e•orepte Iilorlds privet) ' sepals spp.e Iwec bornIN fisrMsle J•e.oeoldess IGarleelel Mwcerwea recrrests Ifb -161ll Geeplrs discolor 101•I1�1 110"Olovillee $pp. 10orgearloloes Manages p•tMs IScKIe/hrsh. Mlrehrshl !� thrnt llPd chlsn c raerlM Ioetlrlly 111111 0ressels eclleopinsll• Ischolllrel tlelrchlue Ilarue Id•Ilor Illlpl Iwasonlee $"code Ideceslherrys .; Ile�chire oereeerlema IKehill Iloilo Gllies�e heeestacephsis 4PONO rpatll Wdvchore sun. IGleger Iloilo tatilcrp* MericMe lANWICM hesotrhsshl IIeIIMthrs dINllls 108•ch sunflowers Cemptlt reilce+td firamot •Iasi Nlhlscrs roes-slnMslss INlhlscesl Cessie spp.e feestlel . . RpaaceMlls letllollee ISplder fillet Castle f►ehensrsise Icesslet _ flow olehree eG•llherryl Chrreabelanes Icsce /toWpfrl so" vMitrle eases lowsrl yerpon holly) . Cession Iseworessi Ipoeoes sm. IN�rnlno olorles, rallroed rlssl tallasww werle�elun* Mlko/owf $we IrrctMtcMs Imsh elder) Ionocerpel ereclws /Ggfts !th•Ilonwcm0► ' h No Inerlcs/s Settles! Wars el/�r a I:e"MANpes erodes srHlrews Isitver hrltnewo�wli lecgwlwls tesensls IJoew«sl g i m ;!fly;; "' ,'; .. � . ; .. - • .'- - e �i i�'loe d3j•}•`"."!""' ... _iI,r ,Istraye M11111do Ehrwl"' Ileadle scaleste IRasdla, 11hits Indian berry) laml�erea cslssssla cslerasrls• Ilmelpsrsl 11-1 — is plea) Awiperes comforts' ISbre }'IWI Saslf/arse IArroatmodl • lop slroealeladlcss 4traps-Mfr11a1 Stemple plualorl /11FAborryl lfs+eams deoreasa 16stsrf Ifnfsnel Selrpos Ilflrestil lamlame owtoridols f6ferf IMf•oa/ SooUsre tomentosa 111ockleco pod) Upostna spy.• II'rleell Slsaelablr suns• ITellor elder) Pasts. - r Swims Merl/lea Issy coder) _ ►1rlosa ofscarl® fl t/!y faro Tseoesrle eaoeasls Icsp bnoysadilel - Miprctsnte�os Ir alross ISlsy�soe stopper/ Ta.ediaa If:yoressl feyretares eaellflorso IBaM/lcaba0 Tecarrle caoemsls Ic"e bmelsocklel 11yr ce corlfere /Soalbere suss wells, Sm*Wttt Tofratppla bicolor Ilefrolysle, tlesf Indian Met - _ Nspreteyts bostew/srsls 811estM feral w Tbu*wols area/M folnys • Montle) q'heoppope j•lonecos° )lessee Sross1 - tbmbWele spp.• Klock wine) ti'sreae• e►tfs/totes EPeosroslal Thyrallis Slows Ithyrallls/ Pelres volabillss 19ween•s argot►l Tracblesosrfse. jasialnoldss• Icomfederele )aaslas/ Aaeorerle spctasso iTareo SlnSsrl ftetodsndron spp.® fCsllonar pAllodsadree/ IMslsla oaslcelata ISO* pots) dears elllettes sanely des" lee" comely gIMI rlbsrsme srsyamsrmo ISsmdamMw •Ibs+rnssm/ 1'11lecalblum Swdslmpeese• Itllachbowl Trcca abpnamtl�es ISolnslfss yrcul w lash flerldeme ICaossllel flwr Ia off. flrw4lpwll f :. l•alb.Tlrs few& Ivied $&"I - l�sAecarors s�.o 11'b'IocarNst ft6yscters ►elfefrlemso fealfoer arelle/ ' `_ Ilswlsdrta Ee`icasrsloeedl r arvi • coolie softies f+syrkArIs aer+esa Le/d eaffee/ ^� w Sources WPM t� •:r x .,.... .. .'_ :.. _.. .. .. .. ... ..:. .,.. - _.. .. 1 L y�$ .�*f ,f� <_.. ... ... w....._ >,,.,." . ..1•... 4♦..n.a. ".:-., - - i., 'f-w ... "2M. .. .. .. :,o,ill 4. ,. �', t. .. ,........ ,. .. F. 'ti..s, A. _ •.-.r.... ".�:.. ... :. r, Ai3�'., .. r,.-.: , •. "- ', -w. .:, Adjust west curb on public land an southbound , approach and adjust trsff lc signal' heads as reouired, t0 create four versus presen♦ three 90061bound through lanes. Lane drop to be eerily accaaWdeatad south of intersection+ within existing peveaent through left turn at ®isdayne 8ouleverd May prior to BrickelI Avenue bridge approach. Modify signing and striping throughout section as required. 2nd Avenue and SE Ind Street Adjust Channeiltation curbing in southeast corner to provide two westbound through Imes and three soporate left turn lanese plus one free flow left d turn lane Inside codified channel12ation island. Two of the left turn Imes for access to 1-" entrance rasp near SE Ind Avenue and SE 3rd Street. one Mandatory and one optional. AdJustsent of channelitetion Island In soutaeast corner to also allow three southbound through lanes. �. tronsitioned through Intersection with skip guide lines. (one sanslatory right turn lone mid fto through Imes currently in place.) flevise signal need displays. pedestrian features, overhead and other signing* and pavement a wkings as rest lred. EftfrOnCO and Qxl+ drives to be-ccordInated wl+.4 ultimate bifurcated ramp design and City of Mimi Public Works Department. asometric alterations at project drives "*or 111scayne- Boulevard May 00 Biscayne Boulevard Way. This is to Include revised dralnege.es, necessary* outside peveven+ widening within existing right of way, 23 Signal 1.00lon of ex I+ drive to be Installed when warran+edt and revised povwen+ workings. Also provide custom material and con0ructkon for approximately 1,200 to*+ of sidewalks along project, street frontage and riverwalk frontage, and all Seating, I IghtIngg and IgndscapInge all for public use 4, 1111gage, Boulevard VqZ Access Roadway City to preserve present public rig" of way for separate 181 easft"M access roadway sou+.4 of Biscayne Boulevard Wray. to extend from SE 3rd Avenue to 8Isc&Vna, Plate project south vehicular traffic entrance. preserver ion +0 ax%nd 0+ 1*"+ +0 date at COMPIOlon of project Phase 2. (Separate access roadway hO+ deemed neettsory +0 prOlec+ Ph41ta, 1.) 1 v � EXHIBIT S . PROPOSED OEVEIOPMENT AND PHASING{ .,u Office* Commercial Phase (Sq. Ft.) Hotel (So. Ct.) Residential+► Miami Center 791,000 $34 Units 96.297 0 Existing 689,000 S.F. Biscayne Plaza 7009000 0 160,000 60 Units "ass 1 120,000 S.F. (Incl. podium) 1L 1' Biscayne Plaza 7809000 0 60.000 90 Units Phase 2 M • if the market is unfavorable for construction of the 150 resiael+tial units• f, f ttie Applicant will construct ttie`300t000 square feet as office space. r_ SOURCE: ADA • 4 War, W- 77777777�- 4_ Y L:fit- Dst:.RT`s\7 CF c:MIN:TY AFFAIRS RVIS:ON OF R=SCURcs FLANN:NG An MAmat.. 1CREAt' OF LAND ANZ WATIA MANAGLM N-T 2371 asecitive Center Circle, east Tallahassee, Florida 32301•8244 subsection 300.05(15), Florida statutes, places the responsibi:Ity on the developer of an a;p:cved development c: regional Impact (DR:) for submitting an annual report to the local government, the Regional Planning council, the De;&::man: of Ceamunity Affairs, and to all affected permit agencies, e- tr.t date specified in the Development Order. The failure of a _ develops# to submit the report on the date specified in the development order say result in the temporary suspension o: the development order by the local goverment until the annual re;::t In sub'aitted to the review agencies. :his requirement app::es t: all developments of regional impact which have been •;prove_ ?' since August of 1180. If you have any questions aoout this required report, call this CAI enforcement Coordinator at, (5:4: Please send the original completed annual report to :::e designated local government official stated in the dove/o; en: „t order with (1) copy to each of the following: a) She regional planning agency of Jurisdictions { b) All affected permitting agencies; M C) Division of Resource Planning and management Bureau of Land and water Management {.,` 2571 aseeative Center Circle* east Tallahassee. Florida 32303 Please format your Annual status Report after the format examp:e provided below. ANN= 11 ATUi REPORT Reporting Periods to Month/Day/year Month/Day/year Developmeats Name of DRI `a h. Location: e City County Developers !tame: Company lame ' Address# Street Location City, State, tip Code 1108 -rn 'n BLWM-07-13 Page Two 1) Describe any changes made in the proposed plan of development, phasing, or in the representations contained in ha Application for Development Approval since the Developrarz a: Regional Impact received approval. Please note any act:ans (substantial determinations) taken by !deal government to ud:ems these changes. Motes It a response is to be more than an* sentenceo attach as ;a tshibit °A° a detailed desciption of each change and copies o: the modified site plan drawings. tahibit •A° should also ad_:ess the following additional items if applicable. a) Describe changes in the plan of development or phasic; tot the reporting year and for the subsequent yea:s; b) State any known incremental DRI applications go: development approval at requests for a substantial deviation determination that were filed In the raio:::a:' year and to be filed during the nest year; e) Attach a cc" of any notice of the adoption of development ardor or the subsequent modification o: an adopted development order that was recorded by the developer pursuant to Subsection 310.04(14)(4), T.S. 2) gas there been a Change in local government jurists c:i:• for any portions of the development since the development Ord*: vas issued? If so, has the annexing local government adopted a now Development of Regional Impact development order fat the project? Please provide a copy of the order adopted by the amazing local government. , ') Provide copies of any revised saster plans. Incre_enza: site plans, etc., not previously submitted. Notes If a response is to be note than one or two sentences, attach as txbibit. 'ND.• a) provide a summary comparison of development activity proposed and actually conducted for the reporting year. Xsampl*z lumber of dwelling units constructed# site improve rentso lots sold, acre$ mined, gross floor area constructed, barrels of $total* capacity eoaiplated, permits obtazn*d, etc. Notes If a response if to be more than one sentence, attach as sJohibit °C.° S) save any undeveloped tracts of land is the developeent (other than individual single-family lots) been sold to a .separate entity ar developer? It So, identify tract, its site, and the buyer. !lease provide saps which show the tracts involved. Tract buyer Motes* If a response is to be more than one sentence, attar as tsbibit °D.° i) Describe any lands purchased or Optioned adjacent to the original development of Regional Impact Site SWW*4a*At to issuance of the develop**nt order. Identify such laud0 its and intended•use an a S:t* plan and asp. Motes if a response IS to be mot* than one sentWn"# ""Ch » List any substantial local, state, and Cede:a: pe:nz%s which have been obtained, applied tor# or denied, du::n; :n:z reportiRq'pe::od. 1peci!y the agency, type Of persit, s-d dal got each. Notes id a response is to be more than one sentence, a::ae` as tah:9it •a.• rp A.• • � .•• G f.• • sr1. The entire develo ment site, consisting of Miami Center Exis—tng and Biscayne Plaza (as proposed) is described as follows: • Tract"D," DU PONT PLAZA, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 50 at Page 11 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Begin at a point 25.00 feet South of the Monument Line of Southeast 2nd Street extended Easterly and 1067 24 feet East of th M . e onument Line of Southeast 2nd Avenue and run East, parallel to and 25.00 feet South of the Monument Line of Southeast 2nd Street extended fot 645.94 feet; thence South 0 degrees 04 minutes 07 seconds East for 352.27 feet to a' Point of Curvature; thence Southwesterly along a circular curve to the right, having a radius of 65.16 feet and a central angle of 71 degrees z 02 minutes 59 seconds, for an arc distance of 80.80 feet to a Point of Tangency; thence South ; 70 degrees 58 minutes 52 seconds west for 73.53 feet; thence South 70 degrees 58 minutes 36` seconds West for 744.58 feet (last mentioned five courses being coincident with the boundary of the afore® mentioned plat of DU PANT PLAZA); thence North (radial to the next described curve) for 34.61 feet; thence Northeasterly and Northerly along a circular curve to the lef t having a radius of 222.50 feet and a central t angle of 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds for an are distance of 176.715 feet to a Point of Tangency; thence North for 377.00 feet to a _ Point of Curvature; thence Northeasterly along a circular curve to the right, having a radius of 300.00 feet and a central angle of 28 degrees 34 minutes 00 seconds for an arc distance of 149.57 feet to a Point of Compound Curvature; thence Northeasterly along a circular curve to the eight, having a radius of 23.00 feet and a central angle of 61 degrees 26 minutes 00 -seconds for an are distance of 26.81 feet to the Point of Beginning, lying and being " In the City of Miami, Dude County, Florida. - M }QR'P T^fr1 .• ON 10 .� ..dam..• lRze-•Ao 4+F.... • EXHIBIT "Elt - .That portion of the property containing Miami Center Existing is described as follows: Being that portion of Tract D, Block 1, "duPont Plaza," according to plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 50 at page 11, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, being more particularly - described as follows: Begin at the Northeast corner of said Tract D and ' run West along the North line of Tract D for 645.94 feet to a Point of Curvature; thence Southwesterly along a circular curve to the left having a radius of 25.00 xast and a .4ntr"l angle of 61 degrees 26 minutes 00 seconds for an are distance of 26.81 feet to a Point of Compound Curvature; thence Southerly along a circular curve to the left having a radius of 300.00 feet and a central angle of 28 degrees 34 minutes 00 seconds for an arc distance of 149.57. feet to a Point of Tangency;. thence South for 293.50 feet . (said last mentioned four courses being •' coincident with the boundary lines of said Tract •D); thence East for 179.41 feet; thence North for 150.00 feet; thence East for 5225.36 feet; thence North 0 degrees 04 minutes 07 seconds West along • the East line of said Tract D for 300.00 feet to thi Point of Beginning, lying and being in the City of Miami, Dade County, Florida. .+. if quiz i.2•,,i - . ? r+, • r .. � _ • • . Wit.-��.wn :.�'.w .. •. .�nr wades:�.��*,..n•-.-r-_e.•-+..,ern s�:.,ewr... e.. .�ei s..-.e.,..•. ;n.1;•.. � EX4191 T " F" That portion of the property containing Biscayne Plaza, as proposed, is described as follows: Being that portion of Tract D, Block 1, 'du Pont Plaza % according to the plat thereof as recorded In Plat Book 50 at Page 11 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: ,Commence at the Northeast corner of said Tract •D• and run South 0 degrees 04 minutes 07 seconds Bast# along the East line of said Tract 'D", for 300.00 feet to the point of Beginning of the parcel bereinafter described; thence continue South 0 degrees 04 minutes 07 seconds East along the East line of said Tract "Do for 52.27 feet to a Point of Curvature; thence Southwesterly along a circular curve to the right having a radius of 65.16 feet and a central angle of 71 degrees 02 minutes 39 seconds for an arc distance of 80.80 feet to a Point of Tangency; thence South 70 degrees 58 minutes 52 seconds West for 73.53 feet; thence South 70 degrees 58 minutes 36 second& West for 625.56 feet; (said last mentioned five courses being coincident -with the boundary lines of said Tract •D") thence North along the Lasterly Right -of -Way line of Biscayne Boulevard and its Southerly prolongation for 191.81 feet; thence Last for 179.41 feet; thence North for 150.00 feet; thence East for 525.36 feet to the Point of Beginning, lying and being In the City of Miami, Dade County. Florida. tip, - - a t, 6 v• 4 Wl • CITY OF MIAMI. FLORIDA INTER•OrFICE MEMORANDUM TO Honorable Mayor and Members o•TC June 19, 1986 n�c: of the City Coaani•ssion SUuCCT: RESOLUTION - RECOMMEND APPROVAL — WITH MODIFICATIONS - AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT ORDER Cesar H. Odio "1 APPROX 301-399 S BISCAYNE BLVD �, rnoM: City Manager 1► Iltn�iNese: COMMISSION AGENDA - JUNE 26, 1986" eNe�osu�es: PLANNING AND ZONING ITEMS It is recommended by the Planning Advisory Board that issuance of an i amended Development Order for the r 'r One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne ty Plaza) portion of the Miami Center I ,, - Project, a Development of Regional Impact, (Resolution 79-396; May 24 F� 19799 as amended) • located at approximately 301-399 South Biscayne .� aPP y t.' Boulevard be approved with 5 modifications. 4�5, S: The Planning Advisor Board, at its meeting of June 18 19869 Item 1, following an advertised earing, adopted Resolution PAB 20-M by a 9 to 0 vote, recalellendin a rowal with modifications of issuance of an amended Development order for tni pkt Plaza A Biscayne Plaza) BorTf n'of. TW am entee ee , a eve opine o Pg ona mpa , eso u on 9- 396;"W"z4. 1970- as amended) located at approximately 301-399 South Biscayne Boulevard, also described as the southern portion o rac , oc ,UUF - PCXzA_W-11) P.R.D.C. (complete legal description on file with the Planning and Zoning Boards Administration Department), pertaining to Condition 1 of the Development Order (Exhibit A for the One OuPonb Plaza project) which proposed amendments delete two toners compri s�, i ng 500 dwelling units of 8650700 sware feet of gross res)�"eniiaT'6ui lding area and Zo parkingspaces and sub titute two. towers c ai 1 48D OOO s are o roes a ce area; 01000' resi e square a comNIerc a u area a square feeto • Wilding. area col r s ng ISO owelling units which may De convertia 55 officeL perLap er .06 F.S. zoned CBD-1/9 CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT. J4_ One opponent present at the meeting. Nineteen proponents present at the F; meeting. Backup information is included for your review. - qec — __- `t ', ''`' — rt�c �.t!4�v.:3�.!�:.�.!.�irii,�,.a,•tfw5,.s4z�-..+a ,. a •, t <. .`� .�.��:fera. 2:i-�-`�`�::t` - -= MATTY HIRAI City Clerk DEPUTY CITY CLERKS Robert F. Tingley Georgia M. little Evelio Rizo October 23, 1986 Sylvia M. Mendoza Svhvia Lovvman Lillian DitAmon STAFF SUPPORT Elva Ricardo Mr. Tom Lewis Secretary Florida Department of Veteran and Community Affairs Division of Resource Planning and Management 2571 Executive Center Circle East Tallahassee, Florida 32301 RE: MIAMI CENTER I PROJECT Dear Mr. Lewis: Enclosed herein please find a copy of Resolution No. 86-828, passed and adopted by the City of Miami Commission at its meeting held on October 7, 1986, which is self explanatory. On behalf of the City of Miami, thank you for your attention. V"e truly yours, Matty Hirai City Clerk MR: 81 : ENC: a/s October 231 1986 Ks. Ane Deister Interim Executive Director South Florida Regional Planning Council 3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 140 Hollywood. Florida 33021 RE: MIAMI CENTER I PROJECT Dear Mr. Deister: MATTY HIRAI City Clerk DEPUTY CITY CLERKS Robert E. Tingley Georgia M. Little Evelio Rizo Sylvia M. Mendoza Sylvia Lowman Lillian Dickmon STAFF SUPPORT Elva Ricardo Enclosed herein please find a copy of Resolution No. 86-828v passed and adopted by the City of Miami Commission _at its meeting held on October 7, 1986,' which is self explanatory. On behalf of the City of Miami, thank you for your attention. October 23. 1086 Mr. Ethan Minsky Shea and Gould 801 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1401 Miami Florida 33131 MATTY HIRAI City Clerk DEPUTY CITY CLERKS Robert E. Tingley Georgia M. Little Evelio Rizo Sylvia M. Mendoza SvIvia Lot+man Lillian Dickmon STAFF SUPPORT Elea Ricardo RE: MIAMI CENTER I PROTECT Dear Mr. Minsky: Enclosed herein please find a copy of Resolution No. 86-828, passed and adopted by the City of Miami Commission at its meeting held on October 7, 1986, which is self explanatory. On behalf of the City of Miami, thank you for your attention. Ve=� truly yours, October 23, 1966 Mr. Jeffrey Bercow Steel Hector & Davis 4000 Southeast Financial Center Miami Florida 33131-2398 RE: MIAMI CENTER I PROJECT Dear Mr. Bercow: MATTY HIRAI City Clerk DEPUTY CITY CLERKS Robert E. Tingley Georgia M. little Evelio Rizo Sylvia M. Mendoza Svlvia Lowman Lillian Dickmon STAFF SUPPORT Elva Ricardo Enclosed herein please find a copy of Resolution No. 86-8289 passed and adopted by the City of Miami Commission at its meeting held on October 7, 1986, which is self explanatory. On behalf of the City of Miami, thank you for your attention. Ver truly yours, Matty Hirai City Clerk MH : sl ENC:` a/s 6 f a :N MATTY HIRAI Cite Clerk DEPUTY CITY CLERKS Robert E. Tingley Georgia Ni. Little Evelio Rizo October 23. 1986 Sylvia M. Mendoza Sylvia Lowman Lillian Dickmon STAFF SUPPORT Elva Ricardo Mr. Richard Pe Brinker Clerk of Dade County Circuit Court 240 Dade County Courthouse 73 West Flagler Street Miami Florida 33130 RE: MIAMI CENTER I PROJECT Dear Mr. Brinker: Enclosed herein please find a copy of Resolution No. 86-828, passed and adopted by the City of Miami Commission at ite meeting held on October 7, 1986, which is self explanatory. ur attention. On behalf of the City of Miami, thank you for yo AM CITY Or M5IAMI, €" ORIDA W INTER -OFFICE IVIRMOPANDU TO: JOEL MAXWELLI, ESQ. Assistant City Attorney FROM: MATTX HIRAI City Clerk DATE: December 9, 1986 FILE: SUBJECT: Niaral Center Recording Invoice an REFERENCES: ENCLOSURES: Under Resolution No. 86-8289 the City Clerk was directed to record the Miami Center I Development Order on the public records of Dade County, Florida, which resulted in an unnecessary expense of $781.00. We were later informed that the developer should have been directed to record said document. Enclosed herein please find the invoice. Kindly direct appropriate party to pay for same. Attached please also find letter from Richard Brinker informing us that the recorded instruments are ready to be picked up. We are also forwarding this letter to you for appropriate handling. 04063. RICHARP P..'60INKER No. CLERK OF CIRCUIT AND qpNTY COURTS AND COIJNTY;-IRK DAVE coUNTY, FLOR13. COUNTY REORI 1 3en - "IdIms 10440 C 73 WEST MIAMI, FLORIDA 33.13 RECORDING Date November 10,1986 $=Vold OR VIVIwo" p"FORMING GRAVICIL VILHOOR No.. IF Apm1c^OLR BILL TO: CITY OF MIAMI OFFICE OF CITY CLERK P.O. BOX 330708 Miami, Fla. 33233-0708 [A A-Trc %' 90433 TOTAL .......... .......... 17(0— 72 —77 C.. Vj-,!P t 1 ry; GI.ERtt CIRCUIT Cl I�O,C1r�Y?fr GoUt�TS November 10, 1986 Honorable Matty Hirai City Clerk Office of the City Clerk City Hall 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, Florida 33233-0708 Dear Ms. Hirai RE: RECORDING MIAMI CENTER I PROJECT 242 ROOM A3& SCVtNTY-THRZZ WEBT rLAOLER MIAMI, rLORIDA 33130 TELEPHONE 13051 375-1168 Please be advised that I have received a copy of your Resolution No. 86-828 and exhibits for recording on the public records of Dade County, Florida. These items will be recorded this date, Monday, November 10, 1986. If all proceeds according to schedule, the documents will be available or returned to your office on Friday, November 14, 1986. I have asked my Recording Section, personally, to call your office so that you may instruct us either to mail the documents or to be picked up by a City of Miami courier. Sincerely, W - 1' - CITY OF MIIAMI. F'1_OnIF3A INTEWOFFICF I" EMO- dANDUM Joseph W. McManus, Assistant Dit@cW1 November 3, 1986 FILE: Planning Department :, SUBJECT: Miami Center One i Government Order Amendment Joel E. Maxwell REFERENCES: City Commission Meeting of •AOM2 October 7, 1986; Resolution Assistant City Attorney ENCLOSURES: No • 66-8 28 N Attached hereto, is Original Resolution No. 86--828 and its ethe°exceptthis ce Hof Development Order. The corrected pages t Kith �on interlineated into the documen have been corrected page 2 of attachment 5, figures 5 and 6 showing the 7 showing the One Dupont Plaza bifurcated ramp system, and figure time line. I am unable to amalgamate said pages into the document tam inasmuch as I do not have any original Orderof �efeThus,d I Resolution and Develop other than the sending those pages along with the complete Resolution and the Clerk's Office. Development Order to you for handling at that it would be necessary for your Department to run Please note the off a new original first page of the Rebseo�u in° theh owing left hand corrected date as 10-7-86 under the J-Num corner. z.: JEM/db/P155 cc: Sylvia Lowman,.City Clerk's Office' Y x Cory or MlAmi, r LomD.A _ INTEIR-OFFICE MF-MOR/w N93UM � ' TO. Natty Hirai City Clerk l�1 FRO(POelE. Max 11 tant ity Attorney OATS: October 28, 1986 r"-E: A.-84-,1.26 SUDJECT Amendments - Resolution 86 . October 7, 1986 REFERENCES -Agenda Item 69; City Commission Agenda of October 7, 1986 ENCIOSURESOne Du Pont Plaza Dev. Order Attached are original pages which amend Resolution 86-828 resulting from floor amendments on October 7, as follows: 1. Page 8; Resolution 86-828 2. Exhibit "A" title page 3. Exhibit "B" (19 pages) 4. Exhibit "C" title page 5. Attachment 5 (page 2 of 3) 6. Figures 5 and 6 (2 pages) 7. Figure 7 Timeline (I page) Please note that the Resolution, with all the exhibits and attachments, to be transmitted to the South Florida Regional Planning Council (and others) (See Section 9 of Resolution) is approximately 190 pages in length. The Applicant will also file a covenant after 45 days if this Development Order is not appealed. If you need assistance in collating, please call Joe McManus at the Planning Department at 6086. JEM/db/P144 Attachments V PLANNING FACT SHEET APPLICANT Miami Center Joint Venture: May 5, 1986 PETITION 1. APPROXIMATELY 301-399 S. BISCAYNE BOULEVARD ou ern po on oWlract 9, Block DUPONT PLAZA (50-11) P.R.D.C. BACKGROUND (Complete legal description on file with the Planning and Zoning Boards Administration Department.) Consideration of recommendations concerning issuance of an amended Development Order for the Biscayne Plaza portion of the Miami Center I Project, a Development of Regional Impact, (Resolution 79-396; May 24, 1979, as amended) pertaining to Condition 1 of the Development Order (Exhibit A) which proposed amendments delete two towers comprising 500 dwelling units of 865,700 square feet of gross residential building area and 20 parking spaces and substitute two towers comprising 1,480,000 square feet of gross office area; 220,000 square feet of commercial building area and 300,000 square feet of residential building area. comprising 150 dwelling units per Chapter 380.06 F.S. zoned CBD-1/9 CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT. To amend the existing Miami Center I Development Order to accommodate the proposed Biscayne Plaza Phases 1 and 2 project. The Miami Center I Development Order was issued. by the City Commission on May 24, 1979, for the project, a Development of Regional Impact, per Chapter 380.06, F.S. The northern 5.45 acres of the site have since been developed with the Pavillon Hotel, the Edward Ball Office Building, a retail area, and structured parking. In late 1985, the Bank of New York assumed ownership of the developed portion of the site. A final Certificate of Occupancy has been issued, predicated on a restrictive covenant that addresses remaining issues in the !Development Order. A previous application to ave d the development order to accommodate this project was recommended as a substantial deviation by the PAB 6/18/66 it" #1 Pqe� 1 Planning Advisory Board on February 6, 1985, and • was withdrawn by the applicant, in public hearing before the City Commission on March 28, 1985. The Applicant filed an mended Application for Development Approval with the South Florida Regional Planning Council on July 11, 1985. On February 3, 1986, the South Florida Regional Planning Council recommended approval of the project, - as amended, subject to modifications. In considering the issuance of an amended Development Order for this project, the Commission must consider the recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council and consistency with other regulations. ANALYSIS The proposed development is comprised of the following components (deletions and underlines show the comparison with the development as previously approved by the City Comission): For the northerly 5.45 acres of the site, known as Miami Cuter Existing Component Units/Spaces Area (Gross Square Feet) Office Tower --- 806,400 791.000 Retail --•SC ow Hotel 634 634 units 668,400• �$g= Parking 1,160 1,TW spaces "'--" Sub -Total 1,.648,800 1,576.297 For the southerly 3.01 acres of the site, known as Biscayne Plaza Phases 1 and Phase I e Component Units/Spaces Office Tower* TM' T M' Xntenna ) 160,000 432,864 120,000 432 060 980.000 } Phase 2 - - Office Tower M_._9 000 ntenna)60000 - Commercial 9 Residential** Zi4 90 units 4 211 860 180000- (in office tower) Sub -Total (Phase 2) + Total (Phase 1 and 2) "_ Grand Total Miami Center 0,343,168 3,57_6,297 Notes: * Equivalent to 333,000 square feet ** The applicant has requested the option of substituting office use t' for residential units if market conditions dictate. *** Equivalent to 600,000 square feet ti The Planning Department analysis is attached. RECOMMENDATIONS PLANNING DEPT. Approval with modifications (see draft legislation attached). -: PLANNING ADVISORY RESOLUTION PAB 19-86 to continue on June 4, -395, y a Y-T vote, the Niami Center I Amendment to June 18, 1986; specifying that any 7° information to the Board by either party must be ;- received by the Planning Department by 6:00 PM June 6, 1986. At its meeting of June 18, 1986, the Planning : Advisory Board adopted Resolution PAB 20-86 by a 9 to 0 vote, recommending approval, as '. amended, of the above. PAO 6/18/86 Ito #1 Ritgo 3 6►' CITY COMMISSION At its meeting of June 26, 1986, the City 14 Commission adopted Motion 86-520 which continued - consideration of the above to 3:30 PM, September 25, 1986, at which time this issue shall be heard subject to applicant's acceptance of ten basic minimum requirements (as more fully outlined by the City's Planning Department on June 26, 1986); further stating that unless the applicant is ready to accept said established minimum criteria, applicant would not be required to appear before the Commission regarding this h issue. At its meeting of September 25, 1986, the City 7 Commission continued action on the above to its ^t meeting of October 7, 1986. f - A a r: PAS 6/18/86 01 }}i�ytte,mm r 4. i . k F a 1111Y Dc M(b'' . . PLANNINri _c ZOP V- CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORAN9AJfA P 16 P2 1S Cesar H. Odio DATE September 16, 1986 FILE City Manager SUBJECT City Commission Agenda Item September 25, 1986 Orr RaV. odriguez, Director AEFERENCESOne DuPont Plaza Project ORI Amend. nning Department F/K/A Miami Center I/Biscayne Plaza ORI. ENCLOSURES This memorandum. decribes revisions and amendments made to Exhibit "B" - the Development Order for the One Ou Pont Plaza Project - since the City Commission public hearing on this item on June 26, 1986, as follows:fj -_ 1. Citj Commission Motion 86-520• June 26 1986, established a September 25, 1985 hearing date, subject to the applicant's acceptance of ten minimum requirements as outlined by the Planning Department. The outline is attached; those requirements which were recommended by the Planning Department, and reviewed and rejected by the Planning Advisory Board, have now been substituted in Exhibit "B" in bold type. 2. Florida Department of Transportation ApRroval Conditions 17b and 25b of x t a nit a y required that the Florida Department of Transportation give written approval of a traffic analysis demonstrating that the FOOT - approved Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System will accommodate the projected traffic from One DuPont Plaza, both Phase 1 and 2. Written approval has now been received from the Florida Department of Transportation by letter of June 24, 1986 attached. Conditions l7b and 25b have now been satisfied and are so noted in bold type on Exhibit "69. SR/JWM/dr ATTACHMENTS w'.. SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES ONE DUPONT PLAZA A/K/A/ BISCAYtE PLAZA Planning DepBrt Planning Advisory Board } Exhibit "B" Issue Recoea>Aendations decided for Cond� its Descriptiaes _ Rivera a1k Who can use it? Planning: Anyone can use it Construction - 55O0,0O0 Applicant: Construction Landaa�rk Focal Point mount deleted 5 Contribute 1 million Applicant: Contribution 6 B�ront Park Cont deleted fic S� jFDOT approval yes/no Planning: Traffic Study . 17b, 25b Traf dY required Planning: Fair Share 17d, '25d Applicant's Fair Share yes required DDA Alternative! Applicant Modifications to Bifurcated Ramps 4 � yeS/no Planning: Fair Share u` 17e, 2Se Applicant's Fair Share: required n= Local Surface :. Street Improvements Applicant's Fair Share: Fund or Loan $51790O0 App Applicant: Loan $5I7,0O0 1. i7f 26f w ` , Brickell Avenue Miami River Bridge Reelacewnt licant: Loan $5,027 25 Applicant's Fair Share: fund or Loan $5.027 million mill ion �179' 9 Bifurcated Ramps Planning: Building 25it Building Peru for Phase 2 Building Permit or ermit tied to Raaafa construction Certificate of Occupancy P Proportionate Split: Applicant can F Proportionate Deletion delete up to 16% of up to 10% of and - 10% limit Proportionately among the,project office, retail and . residential, provided E• there is no reduction ` °F In park ing garage ` J. �,Ss £1��+' to 1 3 c ,, .a ,w "•t, .ate x.n_, e,•*,yJ '+.? ..+,�,i X?�,y'`:'"Fefl+kty .,a.n j:. K;,w,,.w .as.,,d.-a-e Florida Department of Transp,ation 'A rf GOV90004 THOU" .o. a .!UV 25 N a o�Awor r2' C aa�+►Ar � BEFE��fOl�al� �•' Miami Regional Service Center ar:r:.•. 401 N.W. 2nd Avenue, Room 510 Miami, Florida 33128-1794 June 24, 1986 Dear Mr. Rodriguez: Re: Miami Center I/Biscayne Plaza The Department has reviewed the traffic analysis submitted by the applicant and his traffic consultant Transport Analysis Professionals. Also the Department has received additional information concerning the traffic impacts of this project from Jackson Ahlstedt, P.E. A number of operational problems were identified as a result of this review. These issues included pedestrian traffic on surface streets, signal timing at two intersections which resulted in an unacceptable queue on S.E. 2nd Avenue between 3rd Street and Biscayne Boulevard Way, and a need for a left -turn storage lane at southbound S.E. 2nd Avenue/Biscayne Boulevard Way. The applicant's traffic consultant, David Rhinard was responsive to our comments and questions and provided additional information as needed for our review. As a result of our analysis, the applicant has indicated their intention to include signalized pedestrian crosswalks where operational pro- blems were identified, to modify a signal phase to reduce the queue on S.E. 2nd Avenue, and to provide for a left -turn storage lane at southbound S.E. 2nd Avenue/Biscayne Boulevard Way. The applicant had made a recommendation for removal of the S.E. 3rd Street/Biscayne Boulevard signal. The department found this recommendation to be unacceptable and inconsistent with the original development order. The applicant also agreed to rescind their recommendation concerning removal of the signal. With the above modifications to the applicant's submittals and assuming the staging and im rovements resented in the A lication for Oe 1 P P PP ve opment Approval, the Department finds the resulting system would operate at level of service "0" or better. The department suggests that the applicant provide an update to the transportation element of the ADA which incorporates a complete version of the materials provided to the department for this review. fs ZITY OF 1.11APA1.=I_ORIOA iii��.'�•V r:l�w 1`�. �':Q hZ r�i:�lJ �ii ' Cesar H. Odio "'T-- October 1, 1986 City Manager Proposed Applicant Amendments to One DuPont Plaza Project Development Order 'i�`Ttodr�gu6Y"Cffir or CITY COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM Planning Department ::,t:�:���,,t�5. OCTOBER 79 1986 It is recommended that the Commission a) amend the Development Order to include certain non -substantive amendments; b) amend the Resolution, Section 6, to provide new termination dates; c) amend conditions 17f, 17g, 25f and 25g of the Development Order to require letters of credit prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy for Phase 1; and d) accept a voluntary covenant, as proffered. The Planning Department last met with Mr. Russell Wirth, developer of the One DuPont Plaza project, prior to and at the City Commission meeting of June 26, 1986. Since that time, all discussions attended by the Planning Department staff have been with Messers Robert Traurig and Anthony J. O'Donnell, attorneys representing Miami Center Joint Venture. Per City Commission Motion 86-520; June 27, 1986, the Development Order was amended as.shown in bold type and as summarized in Attachments A and B. Parenthetically, it is clear that the applicant is obligated to partially fund the Brickell Bridge and Bifurcated Ramps prior to issuance of building - permits for Phase 2, if a -- public sector financing package has not been committed by December 31, 1991.. r Following the discussion and continuation of Item PZ-9, City Commission meeting of September 25, 1986, the attorney, (Anthony J. O'Donnell) for the applicants (Miami Center Joint Venture), has presented certain proposed amendments by letters of September 29 and 30, 1986 (attached) with which the Planning Department agrees, except as noted in bold type. These proposed amendments: a) amend the Development Order by inserting certain non -substantive amendments (A, B, C, D. Schedule 1 of the applicant's letter of September 29 and revised Figures 5 and 6, contained in the applicant`s letter of September 30) into Conditions 1, 7, 20 and after "warranted", line 9, paragraph 3, Attachment 5, and replacing existing Figures 5 and 6 of the Development Order. Paige 1 of 2 { b), amend the Resolution, Section 6, to provide a new termination date of December 31, 1996 if by which time the applicant must obtain a building permit for Phase 2; provided further that in any event the ` Development Order will terminate on January 1, 2000. (Planning Department added language in bold type) c) add the following language as the last sentence of Conditions 17f, 17g, 25f and 25g (as appropriate); however, the Planning Department recommends additional language (shown in bold type) to the applicants proposal: "Applicant shall provide the City a letter of credit in said amounts ($517,000 or $5,027,000) to be applied to the construction of the above -described improvements prior to issuance of any (temporary, partial or permanent) s certificate of occupancy for Phase I, which letter of credit shall be cancelled if said public sector financing package has been committed for the respective improvements or five years from the issuance of said letters of credit whichever is earlier, provided however that the letters of credit shall be renewed for an additional five years if required by the Miami City Commission.* d) accept a restrictive covenant, as proffered by the applicant, in response to Chapter 380.06 (15) (e) l F.S., which besides binding the applicant to the terms of the Development Order, contains changed language in Section 6, to protect the City's interests in the event of severability of any of the provisions i.e., if a Court found certain provisions invalid and thereby materially affected the agreement, the City could re -zone the property as a last resort. s Page 2 of 2 Page 2 of 2 ,. �r ATTACHMENT A PLANNING DEPARTMENT SWANTIVE ISSUES • ONE OOPOMT PLAZA AMA/ BISCAVNE PLAZA Planning Bepartmemt Planning Department and - Exhibit 000 Applicant have agreed ` Ceinditfons Descriptions Issues on the following conditions: Riverwalk Open to anyone or Anyone can use it. restricted use? 5 Landmark Focal Point Open construction amount Construction by Applicant • or specified as ".000? specified as Approximately but not less than S500,000. 6 Bayfront Park Contribute $1 million? Applicant contributes $1 million. 17b, 26b Traffic Study/FDOT approval yes/not Applicant does traffic ttudy • (FOOT satisfied) 0 17d, 26d Applicant's Fair Share yes/no? Applicant contributes fair DDA Alternative/ share $$$ for DOA Alternative: Applicant Modifications $138,000 + for Applicant - to Bifurcated Rasps Modifications. 17e, 25e Applicant's Fair Share: yes/no? Applicant contributes fair Local Surface share $ii. Street Improvements ilf, 25f Applicant's Fair Share: Fund or Lan $517,000? Applicant funds bonds or Brickell Avenue Miami River provides a letter of credit Bridge Replacement for $517,000 to FOOT* 179, 269 Applicant's Fair Share: Fund or Loan $5.027 Applicant funds,bonds or Bifurcated Ramps million? provides a letter of credit for $5.027 million to FOOT' Building Permits for Phase 2 Building Permit or No Building permits for One x a tied to ho'construction Certificate of Occupancy? Dupont Plaza -Phase 2 until construction has commenced on the Bifurcated Ramps. .. .•� '� '' 2B Proportionate Deletion Proportionate Applicant may delete up to. of up to 10% of and/or 10% of the project, provided 4 tM project 10% limit? it is proportionate among the various uses. k y= wAlternativery, at FOOT's option, ' FOOT may accept a e t a loan._ w ' �+....,d,,.:.:Y `rt. -"� ^ S _..?Cate vra3 ,... . Y:f��-4 r' - ;` �•'.. PHASE 1 PHASE 2 _ ITEM BP CO BP CO 4. Riverwalk t 500,000 5. Landmark Focal Point $ 500,000 6. Bayfront Park Improvement $1,000,000 g. Fair Share: Fire $$$ 12. Fair Sure: Police $$$ 16. Upper Level Pedestrian Connection over Biscayne Blvd. 17c Interim Roadway Improvements $$$ 17d Alternative Bifurcated Ramp $138,000 + Systems 17e Fair Share: Local Surface $$$ Street Improvements 17f Fair Share: Brickell Bridge $ 517,000 179 Fair Share: Bifurcated Ramps $5,027,000 Sub -Total $2,000,000 + $138,000 + $5,544,000 $$$ Sub -Total (By Phase) $2,138,000 + $5,544,000 + Total $7,682,000 + L LAW OFFICES GREENDERG. TRAURIG. ASKEW, HOFFMAN, I_IPOFF, ROSEN 81 OUENTEL, P. A. MICNAEL O. ALSERTINE FCRNAN OO C. ALONBO ALAN S- GOLD HARV EY A. GOLOMAN DESSIE M OR S Y AMBLER N. MOSS, JR. MARK A PACH 'r ll• LII ItI1I 7I ►'h.y^ It 1 t ZACHARY H. WOLFF it CESAR L ALVAREZ STEVEN E. GOLDMAN I I . ��{1 STEVAN J. PARDO ,�� Iel U ( i OF COUNSEL RUOOLPH F. ARAGON STEVEN M. GOLDSMITH OLOA PARKA RICMARO A. ARKIN MATTHEW B. CORSON MARSHALL R. P� V{ FS' �i (�' �: MIAMI OFFICE 1" (� y REUSIN O.O. ASKEW KERRI L. BARSH DIANNE GREEN BERG MELVIN N. GREENBERG BYRON G PETE ALBERT 0. QUENTEL t BRICKELL CONCOURS HILARIE SASS MARILY14 0. GREENBLATT JOEL REINSTEIN MOOT BRICKELL AVENUE ALYSSA M.BAUMGARTEN ROBERTM MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 MARK J. PEIe,' n"ED iL) 1; �}I,� ram_!,; RICMARD SAXTEM C. OSSMAN MAN LUIS REITEI"' -- TELEPHONES NORMAN J. BENFORO LARRY J. HOFFMAN NICHOLAS ROCKWELL MIAMI (305) 579.0500 SCOTT M. BERNSTEIN MARCOS O. JIMENEZ RAOUEL A. ROORIOUEZ SROWARD (305) 523.S111 MARK O. BLOOM MARTIN KALB MARVIN S. ROSEN TELEX 6O.3124 SURT BRUTON STEVE BULLOCK ROBERT A, KAPLAN JOEL J. KARP RICHARD A. ROSENBAUM RONALD M. ROSENGARTEN TELECOPY (305) 579.0718 • 579.0717 ROSERY K. BURLINGTON JUDITH KENNEY DAVID L. ROSS J. PHILLIP CARVER TIMOTHY E. KISH ROBERT O. RUSIN WEST PALM BEACH OFFICE ALAN R CMASE ALAN S. KOSLOW KAREN D. RUNOOUIST 100 SOUTH OIXIE HIGHWAY SuE M COBB STEVEN J. KRAVITZ STEVEN T. SAMILJAN (NEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 3340I KENOALL B. COFFEY STEVEN A. LANDY GARY A. SAUL {305) 659.6333 KATHY A. OARASZ ALLEN P. LANGJAHR CLIFFORD A. SCHULMAN TELECOPY (305) 659.0354 MARK B. DAVIS ALAN S. LEDERMAN MARLENE K. SILVERMAN JEFFREY O. OE CARLO JEFFREY E. LEVEY STUART H. SINGER OSCAR G. DE LA GUARDIA LAWRENCE S. LEVY TIMOTHY A. SMITH BROWARD OFFICE ALAN T. DIMOND NORMAN H. LIPOFF LAURA P. STEPHENSON SUITE 1650 CMARLCS W. EOGAR, Lt CARLOS E. LOUMIET SAMUEL SUSI 110 EAST BROWARD BOULEVARD GARY M. EPSTEIN JUAN P. LOUMIET GARY P. TIMIN FORT LAUDEROALE. FLORIDA 33301 THOMAS K. EOUELS MICNAEL J. MARCHESE ROBERT H. TRAURIG (3O5) 765.0500 DIANE D. FERRARO PEDRO A. MARTIN MARIANNE A. VOS TELECOPV (305) 765 • 1477 LAURA A. GANGEMI JAY A. MARTUS JONATHAN H. WARNER RICMARD G. GARRETT JOEL 0. MASER DAVID M. WELLS BRIAN K. GARY ALICIA M. MORALES JERROLD A. WISH WRITER'S DIRECT NO: DAVID J. GAYNOR ANTHONY J. O'OONNELL. JR. TIMOTHY D. WOLFE LAWRENCE GOOOFSKY JULIE K. OLDCHOFF SHEILA F. WOLFSON 579-0603 - PLtASE 1119PILT TO: MIAMI OFFIC6 September 29, 1986 HAND DELIVERED Mr. Joseph McManus Assistant Director City of Miami Planning Department 275 N.W. Second Street, Third Floor Miami; Florida 33128 Re: Development Order for One Dupont Plaza Dear Mr. McManus: I enclose the following additional amendments to the Resolution and to Exhibit "B" of the proposed Development Order for One Dupont Plaza: 1. Amendment previously submitted to Section 6 of Resolution. 2. Amendments previously submitted to Exhibit "B" of Development Order. 3. Amendments to Paragraphs 17f and 25f of Exhibit "B" to provide letters of credit for the referenced contribu- tions at time of Certificate of Occupancy for Phase I. ONE DUPONT PLAZA AMENDMENT TO RESOLUTION Section 6: Amended to read as follows: "Section 6. The Development order attached to this Resolution for Development of the One Dupont Plaza pro- ject shall expire on December 31, 1996, if prior to that date the applicant has not obtained a foundation build- ing permit for One Dupont Plaza, Phase IIr or upon certification by the Planning Director to the City Com- mission that all conditions of the Development Order have been met, whichever is earliest. i� l � i;ffi: s A. Insert the following language into the "Safety and Security" section of"Exhibit "B" of the Development Order: Simultaneously with submitting any applications for building permits for One DuPont Plaza, Applicant shall furnish to the adjoining property owners of Miami Center Existing and Southeast Financial Center the following: (a) notice of its application for a building permit; (b) a copy of such application; (c) a set of the structural lens for the proposed building• and (d) a P copy of the foundation engineering calculations and reports for such proposed building. Applicant will cooperate with such adjoining property owners in order to maintain the structural integrity and foundation support of their improvements. B. Insert the following language into the "Environment" section of Exhibit Is of the Development Order: Simultaneously with submitting any applications for drainage and water and sewer approvals for One DuPont Plaza, Applicant shall furnish to the adjoining property owners of Miami Center Existing and Southeast Financial Center the following: (a) notice of such application; (b) a copy of the DERM drainage permit application and drainage plans and calculations; and (c) a copy of the .water and sewer permit applications and engineering plans. Applicant will cooperate with such adjoining property owners in order -4 to maintain the integrity of the drainage, Y water and sewer systems serving their properties. C. Insert the following language into Paragraph 20 of Exhibit "B" of the Development Order: c. The letter dated June 18, 1986 executed by the proposed prime contractor for One DuPont Plaza, Pavarini Construction Co. Inc., submitted to the City of Miami Planning Advisory Board at its June 18, 1986 meeting, shall be incorporated into the consolidated. Application for Development Approval (CADA). j 1 � D. In Exhibit of ge-Dalter p"warranted" insert: Attachment 5, paragraph A3, line is (provided, however. that such signalizatioa ' for the One DuPont Plaza exit shall allow for and be coordinated with the future ' signalization for the 100 Chopin Plaza building parking garage exit). -2- MIAMI CENTER 1 - ONE DUPONT PLAZA AMENDMENTS TO PARAGRAPHS 17f AND 25f (EXHIBIT "B" RECOMMENDED DEVELOPMENT ORDER) Add the following language as the last sentence of Paragraphs 17f and 25f: "Applicant shall provide the City a letter of credit in said amounts ($517,000 and $5,027,000) to be applied to the construction of the above -described improvements prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy for Phase I, which letter of credit shall not be cancelled until said public sector financing package has been committed for the respective improvements or five years from the issuance of said letters of credit whichever is earlier." DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS This Declaration of Restrictive Covenants by Miami Center Joint Venture ("Owner"), in favor of the City of Miami, Florida, -a municipality of the State of Florida. W I T N E S S E T R: WHEREAS, the Owner holds fee -simple title to certain property in the City of Miami, State of Florida ("the City"), consisting of the southern 3.01 acres of Tract D, Block 1, DuPont Plaza, as per the plat thereof which is recorded in Plat Book 50, Page 11 in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, as more particularly described in the legal description attached hereto as Exhibit "A" (the "Property"); WHEREAS, the Owner is presently an applicant before the City of Miami Commission for an amended Development Order for the Property under Chapter 380, Florida Statutes (1985); and WHEREAS, the Owner is desirous of making a binding commit- ment to assure that the Property shall be developed in accordance with the provisions of this Declaration; NOW, THEREFORE, the Owner voluntarily covenants and agrees that the Property shall be subject to the restrictions and obli- gations set forth in Paragraphs 2 through 22 of Exhibit "B" of the proposed Development Order, dated September 25, 1986, attached hereto which are intended and shall be 'deemed to be covenants running with the land binding upon the Owner of the Property, and its successors and assigns subject to the following: 1. Effective Date. If the City Commission of the City approves the Owner's pending application for an amended Develop- ment Order and after said approval has become final and non- appeallable, this instrument shall constitute a covenant running with the title to the Property and be binding upon the Owner, its successors and assigns. These restrictions shall be for the Prepared byt Anthony J. O'Donnell, Jr., Esq. Greenberg, Traurig, Askew Roffman, Lipooff, Rosen & ouentel, P.A. 1401 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131 benefit and limitation upon all present and future owners of _.tbe Property and for the public welfare. 2. Amendment and Modification. This instrument may be modified, amended, or released as to any portion of the Property by a written instrument executed by the then owner of the fee - simple title to the land to be effected by such modification, amendment or release providing that same has been approved by the City of Miami Commission. Should this instrument be so modified, amended or released, the Director of the City's Planning Depart- ment or his successor, shall execute a written instrument in recordable form effectuating and acknowledging such modification, amendment or release. 3. Term of Covenant. This voluntary covenant on the. part. of the Owner shall remain in full force and effect and shall be binding upon the Owner, its successors and assigns for an initial period of thirty (30) years from the date of this instrument is recorded in the public records and shall be automatically exten- ded for successive periods of ten (10) years thereafter unless modified, amended or released prior to the expiration thereof. 4. Presumption of Compliance. Where construction has.:, occurred on the Property or any portion thereof, pursuant to a lawful permit issued by the City of Miami, and inspections made and approval of occupancy given by the City, the same shall create a presumption that the buildings or structures thus con- structed comply with the intent and spirit of this Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and said Declaration shall not be construed as a cloud on title to any of said property upon which said deve- lopment has occurred. 5. Inspection and Enforcement. It is understood and agreed that, any official inspector of the City of Miami may have the privilege at any time during normal working hours, to deter- mine whether the conditions of this Declaration are being complied with. hn enforcement action brought by the City shall be by action at law or in equity against any party or person -2- S benefit and limitation upon all present and future owners of _tbe Property and for the public welfare. 2. Amendment and Modification. This instrument may be modified, amended, or released as to any portion of the Property by a written instrument executed by the then owner of the fee - simple title to the land to be effected by such modification, amendment or release providing that same has been approved by the City of Miami Commission. Should this instrument be so modified, amended or released, the Director of the City's Planning Depart- ment or his successor, shoal execute a written instrument in recordable form effectuating and acknowledging such modification, amendment or release. 3. Term of Covenant. This voluntary covenant on the part of the Owner shall remain in full force and effect and shall be binding upon the Owner, its successors and assigns for an initial period of thirty (30) years from the date of this instrument is recorded in the public records and shall be automatically exten- ded for successive periods of ten (10) years thereafter unless modified, amended or released prior to the expiration thereof. 4. Presumption of Compliance. Where construction has occurred on the Property or any portion thereof, pursuant to a lawful permit issued by the City of Miami, and inspections made and approval of occupancy given by the City, the same shall create a presumption that the buildings or structures thus con- structed comply with the intent and spirit of this Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and said Declaration shall not be construed as a cloud on title to any of said property upon which said deve- lopment has occurred. S. Inspection and Enforcement. it is understood and agreed that, any official inspector of the City of Miami may have the privilege at any time during normal working hours, to deter - twine whether the conditions of this Declaration are being complied with. An enforcement action brought by the City shall be by action at law or in equity against any party or person -2- T violating —or attempting to violate any covenants, either --.to restrain violations or to recover damages. The prevailing party in the action or suit shall be entitled to recover costs and reasonable attorneys fees. This enforcement provision shall be in addition to any other remedies available under the law. 6. Severability. invalidation of any one of these cove- nants by judgment of Court shall not affect any of the other provisions of this Declaration, which shall remain in full force and effect; provided, however, that such invalidation may be grounds for the City to amend the zoning and/or land use regulations applicable to the Property. 7. Recording. This Declaration shall be filed of record among the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, at the cost of the Owners. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set their hands and seals this day of , 1986. MIAMI CENTER JOINT VENTURE , s a Florida corporation 71 �r1 '.. t� •Ze.#. u: „ y 7 LAW OFFICES GREENBERG, TRAURIG, ASKEW. HorFMAN, UPOFF, RosEN $ OUENTEL, P. A. MICMAEL 0. ALBERTINE ALAN S. GOLD DEBBIE M. ORSHEFSKY AMBLER M. MOSS, JR. FERNANOO C. AL QTg�{IC,�' 4M A4 MARK A. PACHMAN ZACHARY M. WOLFF CESAR L. ALVAR 0p "r" STSV[N E. GOLDMAN STEVEN J. PARDO OF COUNSEL i RUDOLPH F. ARAGON STEVEN M. GOLDSMITH OLGA PARRA RICHARD A. ARKIN fQ�yQ}�q{ M�TITNEW�O. G70R MARSHALL R. PASTERNACK MIAMI OFFICE ( RWBIN O.O. ABKEWJV6 SEP p6�i 11{INER'iaEENb� BYRON G: PETERSEN BRICKELL CONCOURS {{{( KERRI L. SARSH MELVIN N. GREENBERG ALBERT D. OUENTEL HILARIE BASS MARILYN D. GREENBLATT JOEL REINSTEIN 1401 BRICKELL AVENUE ALYSSA M. UA%,Ltfp� �,�i� RO�9-7 ERT.I„ OROPr4MAN MARK J. REISMAN MIAMI, FLORIDA 33*1 RICHARO O. BAg1TMlt� I Ow..�N.I�Ti1.0,.l.pFF�.11trfI LUIS REITER TELEPHONES NORMAN J. BENFORD LARRY J. HOFFMAN NICHOLAS ROCKWELL MIAMI (305) 579.0500 SCOTT M. OERNSTON MARCOS O. JIMENEZ RAOUEL A. RODRIGUEZ OROWARD (305) 523.8111 MARK O. BLOOM MARTIN KALB MARVIN S. POSEN TELEX 60.3124 BURY BRUTON ROBERT A. KAPLAN RICHARD A. ROSENBAUM - STEVE BULLOCK JOEL J. KARP RONALD M. ROSENGARTEN TELECOPY (305) 579.0718 • 579-0717 . ROBERT K. BURLINGTON JUDITH KENNEY DAVID L. ROSS - } J. PHILLIP CARVER TIMOTHY E. KISH ROBERT O. RUSIN WEST PALM BEACH OFFICE ly ALAN R. CHASE ALAN B. KOSLOW KAREN O. RUNDOUIST 100 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY SUE M. CDOO STEVEN J. KRAVITZ STEVEN T. SAMIWAN WEST PALM BEACH. FLORIDA 33401 • KENDALL B. COFFEY STEVEN A. LANOY GARY A SAUL (305) 659.6333 KATHY A. OARASZ ALLEN P. LANGJAHR CLIFFORD A. SCHULMAN - TELECOPY (305) 659.6354 MARK 0. DAVIS ALAN S. LEDERMAN MARLENE K. SILVERMAN JEFFIREY O. OE CARLO JEFFREY E. LEVEY STUART H. SINGER OSCAR G. DE LA GUAROIA LAWRENCE O. LEVY TIMOTHY A. SMITH BROWARD OPFICE ALAN T. DIMOND NORMAN H. LIPOFF LAURA P. STEPHENSON SUITE 1450 CMARLES W. EDGAR, M CARLOS E. LOUMIET SAMUEL SUSI 110 EAST BROWARD OOULEVARO GARY M. EPSTEIN JUAN P. LOUMIET GARY P. TIMIN FORT LAUDEROALE. FLORIDA 33301 77 THOMAS K. EOUELS MICMAEL J. MARCHESE ROBERT H. TRAURIG (305) 765 •0500 i DIANE O. FERRARO PEDRO A. MARTIN MARIANNE A. VOS it LAURA A. GANGEMI, JAY A. MARTUS JONATHAN M. WARNER TELECOPY (305) 765.1477 RICHARD G. GARRETT JOEL D. MASER DAVID M. WELLS IIAN K. GARY ALICIA M. MORALES JERROLD A. WISH - WRITER'B OIRECT NO: - DAVID J. GAYNOR ANTHONY J. 07DONNELL. JR. TIMOTHY D. WOLPE - 579-0603 LAWRENCE GODOFSKY JULIE K. OLOEHOFF SHEILA :. WOLFSON � 'LEASE RIKPLY TO: September 30, 1986 MIAMI cornea I HAND DELIVERED Mr. Joseph McManus Assistant Director City of Miami Planning Department 275 N.W. Second Street, Third Floor Miami, Florida 33128 Re: Development Order for One Dupont Plaza Dear Mr. McManus: _ } I enclose the revised Figures 5 and 6 of Exhibit "B." —bur understanding is that these documents will ;so.be included in the Commissioners' package for Ortob r 7, 1986. •.. Thalnk you again for your assistance. 1 J Sincerely yours see ANTHONY J. O'DONNELL, JR. AJO:vc Encs. y > , 4. W. so r $-off* W" yy we 1 119. IMP flevilcift czWmv jp -MAN fawmOnds EEO WO -Ot!q ------------ air kv� r Mel �•���• ••tip► � i) I Ii j ` 1 � � 1 tam se"w" 404,04a maw dmd.-� Aft --- -------- f -f-Z-4 gvwcw4L am"Vamm pe4m Post smansv6s doom we&. O.SMXOO&Wv 241 90 4146*4 Ole MLAW4 &"doom *so asswe DISTRIBUTOR BIFURCATED RAMP SYSTEM ' �' II ffl' I� ;Itti r ` 1110 all '! II111) •"&Gc Z_: Jo • �i-�— -- \ •o z ZNSAAL LL 1 sftfmcNT ccatc* t p.. �9r+cc..«.-1'• ! ayt�, 7 ,,y '- fir _ �, ...:1 i .. _�, .. �[ ---•+ *. i7`'' 1. e i of -- ` liil �� � ¢ +yaps+►-;1 { ,-' �, „�� � „� ��c. 1�9 i�� + 4 _ t Rl t C t •x � - •: �, :- .,a ^a.i� l(r �` {,,,,,..` 'M' wit �� a t. y.^ �' ,�"�„}.�+ _ r �w'K'r'S}?! �tiTLa•GFFfC� '��SMO:�A��ClJ�! Planning Advisory Board e o Rodriguez, Director Planning Department May 30, 1986 ';3JEC- Analysis and Recommendations: Miami Center I/Biscayne Plaza Phases 1 and 2' •eeCSiEt•.:i:.: The applicant has proposed to amend the Miami Center I Developfeent order (Resolution 79-396; May 24, 1979 ). The northern S.4S acres of the site have been developed as "Miami Center existing"; the amendment addresses :the So3.01 acres and proposes a project to be known as Biscayne Plata Phases 1 and 2, as follows: Phase_ t_ (Begin construction: 1987; complete construction: 1989) Component Units/Spaces Area (Gross ,Square Feet) Office Tower 7(0,000 022, + "SStenna) --- Commercial . _ 160,000 .Residential 60 units 120 1000 (in office tower) Parking 1.200 spaces - Sub -Total (Phase 1) 980,000 ; Phase 2 (Begin construction: 1990; complete construction: 1991) Office Toner 78 TB�i''s5''I�ntenna ) CC - 600*000_ Residential 90 units 180.000 (in office tower) Sub -Total (Phase 2)-� Total (Phase Land 2) Y,pDp 000 Grand Total Miami Center s Pagel of 7 f 31 j s r• iee 11 7 r,<-A 3� The Planning Department analyzes the project, as follows: Development .The introduction of 700,000 square feet of office space in the Miami market in 1989 and another 780,000 square feet of office space in 1991 will add to the supply, of office space in Brickell/downtown Miami, which according to onf series of projections at current absortion rates, has a six year supply. R, There are 4.5 million square feet of existing and expected vacant office space -,in, downtown and Brickell; beginning this year, it is predicted that 575,000 sgUare.feet of office space will be absorbed annually, increasing to an absortion rate of just over 1 million square feet annually in 1990 and 1991. `I.f._Phase 1 is open for occupancy in July 1989, it will be competing with almost 2.5 million square feet of vacant office space then available. By late 2991, however, as Phase 2 opens for occupancy, it would appear that it would: ` competing with less than 1 million square feet of vacant office space. Coupled with the 780,000 square feet of office space in Phase 2, this may well -.represent somewhat less than a two-year supply, a reasonable period for a Itasing. program. Contrary to this rosy series of projections, other -` :pessimistic views are based on the decline of office space absorbtion in ._• `downtown Miami in the period 1960-1985"'Which "saw office space absorbtion fall #rom 442,000 square feet in 1980 to 34S,000 square feet in 198S: A draft ` report projected in its most optimisticset of assumptions an average annual absorbtion rate of approximately 600,000 square feet for office space'betwetn r, INS and 1995. The total projected demand for the 10 year period was 40968,000 square feet.2 Two conclusions may be drawn: the Biscayne Plaza project entails substantial business risks which however will be assisted by - marketing the high visibility of the towers and many amenities evailable,and. 2,.. secondly, the longer the project is delayed, the better chance it has for success. 11w,introduction of 220.000 square feet of retail/restaurant uses in this off- " center location introduces problems of another kind. The kinds of uses and -amount-of retail/restaurant space would appear to exactly mirror the uses a0d k space included in the Bayside project located at the opposite northern @,, of Barfront Park. Can Miami afford the luxury of two festival markets so close: to'each other? ors << 1 The..following material is from an article in - the Miami Review, February 1986, which relied on information provided by fou state consulting firms. Cushman. Wakefield; Goodkin Research, Clark -Biondi and Appraisal and. Real Estate Economics Associates. Downtown Development Plan and DRI -Miami Florida Economic Anal si s and Grow roec ons c o r , ameer, er, George ssoc a es. P f Page 2 of 7 4 Adraft' report3 performed for theCity, projects that by 1995, the entire downtown area (Omni, CBD, Brickell) will be able to support Bayside plus an addition of from 176,800 square feet to 206,400 square feet of non -department store shoppers goods and from 69,600 square feet to 99,200 square feet of eating/drinking establishments. These figures include expenditure potential from projected downtown employees and visitors plus residents in a larger retail trade area. The 220,000 square feet of retail space proposed in Biscayne Plaza represents 89% of the lowest projection and 72% of the.highest projection made by Hammer Siler George for combined shoppers goods and. restaurant uses throughout the downtown. The 'Biscayne Plaza site, because of its water orientation, is well suited to - capture a disproportionate share of all new downtown restaurant space. it is not, however, in the best interest of downtown to permit the Biscayne Plaza site.to capture a arajor portion of the market for shoppers goods. The site is too" far removed from existing shopping areas; and could preclude development of new ground floor retail space in other areas where it is needed to enliven $` pedestrian streets and plazas. The Biscayne Plaza project should be allowed ' to contain only that amount of space for shoppers goods that cad be supported w by amptoyess within the project. , Using figures in the report, that would translate to approximately 16,000 square feet. The remaining coaanercial floor :area,` not used for restaurants or shoppers goods, should be limited to convenience goods and services such as banks, travel agencies, drug stores, etc. Tfie entire' ground floor frontage along the riverwalk should be squired to be = reserved for' restaurant uses or shoppers goods, in orderr to reinforce pedestrian activity along the riverwalk. BY. way of drawing a contrast, the Planning Department had particularly supported the'retail component of the now -defunct Miami Center>11 project :on 1*e vacant three blocks in DuPont Plaza which offered Z00,000 squara feet of, ratan use on 2 or 3 fl oors , at a visible site atL one of downtownL $if SM' % getaways, directly related to the Flagler Street retail core and where most a�portantly, there was the opportunity of attracting a major anchor department St are -one of downtwvn's prime needs. The pl"Maag Depm*ment cmlu&% that a retail Wrketing stratev rust be 6"sed : that: a) focuses the uses on convealemte "tablish a#a; b) di WWW"ttates babnen D#rsfde and Flagler Street aaarkets awd c) JdwUffres tine 1=t1ow for pnnipectf ve: shoppers. 4 ihid ibid fiR Page 3 of 7 ii �. YAf i Yi a t, w 14 1 Planning Advisory Board May 30, 1486 Economic The Biscayne Plaza project Phases 1 and 2 would be built at a`prVacted cost' of $197.2 million. Temporary Construction eaployaitnt Mould comprise an average of 917 employees annually for six years with total, wages- of :$65.6. million. Permanent employment is estimated to range from 12,144;to,13,537 persons with annual wages in excess of $350 million. The South Florida. Regional Planning Council estimates however, that only about.25:percent of these jobs, (2,497-2,782 employees) can be considered new to the region. Through a multiplier effect 5,442-6,100 total jobs would be expected; and in added. S1OB. -121.5 million in total wages and $184.1-207.6 million value would, be added to the South Florida regional (Dade, Broward End Monroe Counties) economy. The Planning Depa. t records consideration of a minority contracting atw a =JwJty employment plan. Fiscal The project would have a positive fiscal impact, according to the South Florida Regional,Planning Council. Using 1984 as 'a hypothetical perforiaance considering ail- revenues received by local,'governments from the project .and:' deducting the public cost of providing Iservices to the project, a netlivplus of $3 2 million would have been received by' the _City ' of Mi ami ; $2.4 ert 11 i on': would have been received by the Dade County School Board and; ;2.3 million: would have been received by Metro'Dade County; and $200,000 by other units of local government for a total of $8.1 million net surplus. Environment - Using computer modeling techniques, the applicant estimates, that` the highest predicted eight -hour concentrations of carbon monoxide will be 74 parts per=: million of "ampient air in 1991, which is 82 percent. of the state standard. i'. -project traffic issubtracted, the predicted eight-hour'1991 concentrates`04. drops to 3.7 ppm, which is 41 percent of the state standard. The permanent carbon monoxide monitoring station at 101 East F1ai�ier Staµir�tt has accorded many *xceedances of State standards for carbon ,mohoxi `',duriarg the last few years. LA 41. E%__J J. to .i-e,.&A_ 9.1 9-- approximately 5 feet below grade. Federal flood insurance requirements specify that the minimum first floor elevation shall be + 14 NGYD. However the applicant proposes restaurants and shops opening directly on the Riverwalk at elevation + 5 NGYD. The, Plaming Department supports tids,exception, and the Planning Department understands that the applicant has been granted an exception by the Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Managm-t. The applicant proposes to design a storm water system to handle a 25-year storm, and to retain storm water runoff equivalent to a 25-year storm on -site. Parking garage washdown water will be routed through oil and grease Interceptors into the sanitary sewer system. This system should insure that no polluted water will be discharged into Biscayne Bay. 7W Plaaiing Department rinds conditions for delaying caAstructors if arehslogicai artifacts are found, for ratamtion of storm waterduring the construction period, and for monitoring hazardous waste. The, Planning IDgmwlment further recommends that the Riverwalk, fund a landmark focal apptia:ant construct file hrfrorrt Park as a means of point and eontribett! to file construetion of Y providing ow envirommemt mv v will visitors, office workers in the project and pedestrians, j' directly benefit the project and ameliorate its apparent bulk. Public Facilities It is. estimated that the project would increase the demand for potable water and wastewater by an average of 415,000 gallons per day; which can be accoaodated by the Metro Dade Water and Sewer Authority. The estimated 149 cubic yards of solid waste generated per day. would be transported by private haulers. To increase safety and security and to aceamatodate possible un ded �doftmds 0o fire aetd pol i cue rvvenun, the P1 rani ng : t . i s recaww,$ rag _ "fitir '". is; tb* provision of aerials i n %a roof of tirwt tar row for tip City's ome ituaaications systro; a safety and Security "V"W by that Police ; and approval of construction documents by tits fire MarsM1 E..n r:, Florida Power and Light Company indicates that they will be able to supply the estimated 34.369,000 KWH annual electrical demand. The South Florida Regional-, Planning Council estimates that _ the project would increase anal . demands within the region by the equivalent of nearly 6.7 Million ga11 oi;: crude oil. To coaserve energy, the South Florida Regional PIUMN9 l _ Page 5 of 7 - 2r 1� has recoMmrended a series of energy conservation measures, with rhich the Plamtring Department agrees. Transportation r The transportation system for the projects in Dupont Plaza depends upon: a) the Metrorail/Downtown Component of Metrorail ("Metromover"); b) the I-95 Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System; and c) an improved surface street system. The Metromover opened for revenue service in mid-1986. The Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp system to be undertaken by the Florida Department = of Transportation has encountered serious delays; right of way acquisition funds are now available but construction funds have been removed from the 5- year State Transportation Improvement Program subject to confirmation by FOOT in June of this year (due to state-wide competition for highway construction funds and the availability of federal construction funds). Current estimates that 'improvements to the JOC&lr street system will require $2.3 million in local funds are being reviewed. Further complicating the issue is a recent change in State Legislation that requires local goverment to make provisions in development orders for the infrastructure required to accommodate development. To :ft"s these issues, the Planning Department r�acomm�eerds a series of action Minch tie -the developmeft of Biscay" Plaza Phases 1 and 2 to the Tailing for the ongoing progress toward completion of the transportation 3efore starting Phase 1, the applicant should address the followtng Items: 1. The OaparWent fimuis twat there are five roadway systems, on: five different readioeys that currently operate below level of sewice "D" in -the exuded traffic impact area, bou ailed by 1-3% on the uNartit, ISth fboad orr fire seu*, hpS on the westarms !li sucatorme e'r that , Tire applicant t should undertake a series of interim road imprrw�wrets wf tint n mind crowd the Diu Pont Plaza area toL assure that l eftl s of sa+rvice do L not '. uftl 00 deteriorate. The applicant and tore City kp t t of Public Vo ks are evaluating six Improwevauu., Tire applicant should dedicate all requafred rights -of -ray. 2 The applicant swouuld assure, and awmimmut idth, owe FOU do Region &I Plamrniung Council Staff, owe Cwuruty maid the City sat Ow FW- aprt red Motown Distribution bifurcated Ramp Systurm will srfficiently aooawr11iate the traffic projected for biscayew Plazas Phase 1 and 2. 30 If tare FOOT -approved Downtown Distributor Bifurcated f aenpsystem, It, merged to ei titer: a) the DOA modified plan, our b) taw! aplrll nte. "filed plan, twen the applicant siiawuld bear the casts 6f ®adffrte planes mad providing additional roadway Improvements. ,r. Page 6 of 7 %few WW IV sweet OVION 4WAS41% %IF- av%livelaaw a oil volume mew* Upon receipt Of Such an application for change, the director of the Department of Planning Ing shall prepare a statement demonstrating whethin, or not such changes would ant the same "inments as for the original approval. The director shall transmit such statement,, together With rkommln- dations an the proposed changes, to the City ComiMssion. The Commission may take such action as in appropriate in the matter, provided, if the Commission has not acted after two (2) regular meetings of the Commission have been hold for the following receipt of application change, recommendations of the director of Planning shall be deemed to have been approved. Mwe requests for changes we made that art found not to to within the re"i"ments for wil Anal approval, application for such changes shall be made as for an original application for major land use special permit. 1. Current survey of the property, sketches and/or plans as 2. Affidavit as to current ownership of the property and application, as well as Uisclosure of Ownership form. 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within 3751 radius frogs the outside boundaries of the subject parcel. 4. 1" of $300.00 to apply toward cost of processing. Page 1 of 2. DATE May 5, 1986 The under signed, being the owner or the representative of the owner$ of the property located at Aooroxisately 301-399 (S.) Biscayne Blvd AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS: the southern POM-on"orTract 0, D0 PONT PLAZA (50-11). complete legal descri tion on file with the Plannt and Zoning Boards Administration Dept "—egal descriptioni Well) respectfully request the approval of the City of Miami for the following amen nt(sy"to the Development Order for the above -described property as defined by Florida Statute 3E0.06: To provide for the change in use from 500 dwelling units to approximately 1,500,000 sg. ft. of office, 300,000 sq. ft. of residential use which may be converted to office and 220,000 sq. ft. of retail use to be built at a maxi" height of 9SO ft. - y ,k This application is being accepted subject to the City Of Miami's right to require joinder of the Rank of New - York or legal parties in interest for Phase I prior to the holding of any public hearing by the City of Mimi on this application. p... �:.� May 5, 1986 y TTMWM 1131 R1 MCI Attorney for applicant NAME _ Miami Center Joint 14^ otur2 c/o Ethan Pxul M1nskv ADDRESS -- 1Q1 IrickglI Avenus►, 14 F1c0r .� - CITY, STATE, ZIP Miaeai , _FL 31131 This application is approved denied in accord with City Comission on Resolution ft. other re A00.1 Page 2 of 2 w Sefore me, the undersigved authority. this day perunally appeared Ethan Paul -Minsky -- . %0ho being by we first duly sworn. wm arth, domm at som 2. That all owners utdch he represents, if any, have given their !till and emplete pomd3sion for hire to act in their behalf for the change or =d4 icatio a of aclassification or regulation of zonLv g as set ' out in a the accovanyin petition. 3. That the Pagel attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names. aailiM addresses. phone mmbers and N legal descriptions for the real property % ichhe is the owner or legal fi ttipr"Cuative. 4. the facts -as rated in the application and don—r-w-nu s submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. ftrther Affiant sayeth not. (SEAL) (Name~ Ethan Paul Minsky Shea & Gould 901 8rickell Avenue, 14th Floor Sworn to and Subscribed before me Miami, FL 33131 this S day of El OWNER'S LIST Miami Center int Venture Owner' s 3ame g 2 O1 i a A York Florida Equity Cor oration One rst Canadian Placp Maili6j Address- Toronto Canada MSX-155 ttn:_ r_.T. zr- Telephone Number 416-862-6270 Legal Description: SEE EXHIBIT A, attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein • Miami Center Joint Venture Owner's N �c/o Management of Washington FU sox 1 Mailing Address Charlottesville, VA 22906 Telephone Number end-24s-7t25 Legal Oescription: SEE EXHIBIT A Owner's Name Mailing Address Telephone Number Ltgal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually. jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375' of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal description r ,ta • Blocks 2, 3 and 4 Approximately 201-339 SE 2 Ave;: OU PONT PLAZA (50-11) b Approx 201-399 SE 4 St -taiscayne Boulevard Way Street Address Legal Description 0 lJ 93MIBIT "A" Le,&al Description w� w me.weww www��� All of Tract D, Block 1, "DuPont Plaza", according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 50, at Page il, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, less the followings - Begin at the Northeast corner of said Tract D and run West along the North line of said Tract D for 64S.94 feet to a Point of Curvature; thence Southwesterly along a circular curve to the left having a 'radius of 2S.00 feet and a central angle of 61 degrees 26 minutes 00 seconds for an arc distance of 26.81 feet to a Point of Compound Curvature; thence Southerly along a cir- cular curve to the left having a radius of 300.00 feet and a central angle of 20 degrees 34 minutes 00 seconds for an arc distance of 149.57 feet to a. Point of Tangency; thence South for 293.50 feet (said last mentioned four courses being coincident with the boundary lines of said Tract D); thence East for 179.41 feet; thence North for 150.00 feet; thence East for 52S.36 feet; thence North 0 degrees 04 minutes 07 seconds West along the East line of said Tract D for 300.00 feet to the Point of Beginning, lying and being in the City of Miami, Dade County, Florida.% i 1 1. tosW description AM xtreet dress of eject read property: See attached Exhibit A - Legal Description of subject property attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. A/K/A Approximately 301.399 (S.) Biscayne Boulevard 2. r(s) of jeo't r-**1 piopm y a0d percentage of ownership. Note: City of Mi#Ai 09dinanco No. W9 +quires disclosure of &11 parties aVIng a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the suoject matter of a presentastion, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly• question 42 requires disclosure of all shareholders of aocpocations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. See Exhibit'B, attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. 3. Lgal desctiption-and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. MIAMI CENTER JOINT VENTURE owns 910cks 2, 3 and 4 of ]DuPont Plaza. A/K/A Approximately 201-339 SE 2 Avenue; Approximately 201-399 SE 4 Street (Biscayne Boulevard Way) aA'l! OE "ARI]DA ) Ss: Comm Cr am Ethan Paul Minsky Shea 6 Gould, 801 Brickell Avenue Suite 1401 Miami, rL 33131 . being duly sworn, deposes and says t ne is the ttorney 90C Opener) of the real property described in answer to question 91, abows that he has read the foregoing answers And that the same are true and o0RPlete1 and (if acting as at for Owner) that he has authority to execute this Disclosure of Owners fors on behalf of the owner. S 10 ! before tat this day of e'Z981. MY COMI 124 Car.R&Ss NOTARY PL;L11' STATE OF FLOWA NY (over) (tam) Ethan Paul Minsky Shea 6 Gould, 801 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1401 Miami, FL 33131 WiFy iC,State Of florida at targe All of Tract D, Mack 1, "DuPont Plasa", according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 50, at Page 11, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, less the following: Begin at the Northeast corner of said Tract D and run West along the North line of said Tract D for 645.94 feet to a Point of Curvature; thence Southwesterly along a circular curve to the left having a•radius of 25.00 feet and a central angle of 61 degrees 26 minutes 00 seconds for an are distance of 26.81 feet to a Point of Compound Curvature; thence Southerly along a cir- cular curve to the left having a radius of 300.00 feet and a central angle of 28 degrees 34 minutes 00 seconds for an arc distance of 149.57 feet to a Point of Tangency; thence South for 293.50 feet (said last mentioned four courses being coincident with the boundary lines of said Tract D): thence East for 179.41 feet; thence North for 150.00 feet; thence East for 525.36 feet; thence North 0 degrees 04 minutes 07 seconds West along the East line of said Tract D' for 300.00 feet to the Point of Beginning, lying and being in the City of Miami, Dade County, Florida.` t EXHIBIT B DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP (QUESTION 2) ~� Miami Center Joint Venture, a Florida joint venture, is the fee simple owner of the property described in Exhibit A to this disclosure of ownership form. Miami Center Joint Venture is composed of two partners, who are as follows: Theodore B'. Gould, an individual residing in the Commonwealth of Virginia, whose ownership interest is fifty percent (50%) and Olympia & York Florida Equity Corp., a Florida corporation, whose ownership interest is 50%. On information and belief, the following is a complete list of all parties -having a financial or ownership interest, either direct or indirect, in Olympia & York Florida Equity Corporation: Mr. William Shapiro; Mr. David Shapiro; 0 & Y Southeast _ Corp.; Baden Real Estate Corp. of New York, a New York corporation; Ms. Egosah Reichmann; Ms. Ada Reichmann; Ms. Renee Reichmann; Mr. Albert Reichmann; Ms. Lee Reichmann; Mr. Paul Reichmann; Mr. Ralph Reichmann; 0 & Y Developments, Ltd., a 'private company chartered in Ontario, Canada and, finally, 0 & Y Equity Corp. of New York, a New York corporation. Miami Center Joint Venture has executed a contract for the sale of the subject property to Wirth & Co., which, on information and belief, is a California limited partnership whose partners are as follows: Russell D.L. Wirth, Jr., Managing General Partner and Paul Soper, Jr., Limited Partner. wi �s EXHIBIT B DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP (QUESTION 2) Miami Center Joint Venture, a Florida joint venture, is the fee simple owner of the property described in Exhibit A to this disclosure of ownership form. Miami Center Joint Venture is composed of two partners, who are as follows: Theodore B•. Gould, an individual residing in the Commonwealth of Virginia, whose ownership interest is fifty percent (50%) and Olympia & York Florida Equity Corp., a Florida corporation, whose ownership interest is 50S. On information and belief, the following is a complete list of all parties having a financial or ownership interest, either direct or indirect, in Olympia & York Florida Equity Corporation: _ Mr. William Shapiro; Mr. David Shapiro; O & Y Southeast Corp.; Baden Real Estate Corp. of New York, a New York corporation; Ms. Egosah Reichmann; Ms. Ada Reichmann; Ms. Renee Reichmann; Mr. Albert Reichmann; Ms. Lee Reichmann; Mr. Paul Reichmann; Mr. Ralph Reichmann; 0 & Y Developments, Ltd.', a 'private company chartered in Ontario, Canada and, finally, 0 & Y Equity Corp. of New York, a New York corporation. Miami Center Joint Venture has executed a contract for the sale of the subject property to Wirth & Co., which, on information and belief, is a California limited partnership whose partners are as follows: Russell D.L. Wirth, Jr., Managing General Partner le and Paul Soper, Jr., Limited Partner. -?till 31T- 11. The entire development sate, consisting of Miami Center Existing and Discayno PlAxA (an proposed) is •described - as follows$ Tract "D," Del PONT P hXA, according to the plat thereof, as recorded An Plat Book 50 at rage 11 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, being more particularly described an follows: Begin at a paint 25.00 feet South of the Monument Dine of Southeast 2nd Street extended Easterly and 1057.24 feet Sant of the Monument Line of Southeast 2nd Avenue and run bast, parallel to and 25-00 feet South of the Monument Line of Southeast 2nd Street extended for 645.94 feeti thence South 0 degrees 04 minutes 07 seconds East for 352.27 feet to a • Point of Curvature' thence Southwesterly along a circular curve to the right, having a radius of 65.16 feet and a central angle of 71 degrees 02 minutes 59 seconds# for an arc distance of $0.80 feet to a Point of Tangency; thence South 70 degrees 58 minutes 52 seconds West for 73.53 feeti thence South 70 degrees 58 minutes 36 seconds West for 744.50 feet (last mentioned five courses being coincident with the boundary of the afore- mentioned plat of DU PONT PLAZA); thence North (radial to the next described curve) for 34.61 feeti thence Northeasterly and Northerly along a circular curve to the left having a radius of 212.50 feet and a central angle of 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds for an arc distance of 176.715 feet to a Point of Tangencyt thence North for 377.00 feet to a Point of Curvature= thence Northeasterly along a circular curve to the right, having a radius of 300.00 feet and a central angle of 28 degrees 34 minutes 00 seconds for an arc distance of 149.57 feet to a Point of Compound Curvatures thence Northeasterly along a circular curve to the right, having a radius of 25.00 feet and a central angle of 61 degrees 26 minutes 00 seconds for an are distance of 26.61 feet to the Point of Beginning, lying and being In the City of Niani, Dade County, Florida. S-1 03 M C Mr. Jeffrey Bercow, Esquire Steel, Hector, Davis 40M Southeast Financial Center Miami, FL 33131 RE: Miami Center I Development Order (RMolu on79-396; May 24, 1979, as amended) Dear M In response to your request of August 7 1986. the Planning Department has no intention of either a) introducing by itself or b) . requiring the owner of "Miami Center I Existing" (the developed portions of Miami Center I including the Intercontinental Hotel and Edward Sall office building and parking garage) to submit an amendment to the Development Order to correct certain discrepancies in Condition 1 of the Development Order. The existing development was built under a valid City of Miami building permit and a final Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. A companion covenant has been submitted by the owner. This letter provides an explanation of this Department's position pertaining to the discrepancy between the land/space uses in the Miami Center I Development Order as allocated and as built. These discrepancies pertain principally to the "as built" area (square feet) of office, hotel, and retail space, the number of hotel rooms and the number of parking spaces at the Hotel Intercontinental and Edward Ball Office Building. These discrepancies were cited in a status report on Miami Center I Existing authored by this Department and sent to the South Florida Regional Planning Council (SFRPC) dated January 30, 1986 and subsequently Included in the SFRPC Assessment for Miami Center I Hated February 1986. The "as built" information which is the basis for these discrepancies was provided in supplementary and augmented, information in the amended Application for Development Approval for Miami Center I (July, 1985). The purpose of providing this comparison to the Regional Planning Council was to raise the question of substantial deviation from the terms of the Development Order as issued, per Chapter 380.06 F.S. The SFRPC has not taken exception. On the advice of the Law Department, the Planning Department has been instructed not to introduce any amendments to any portions of the Development Order, as issued, which pertain to Miami Center I Existing. 4 F a I trust' that this letter meets your request to provide comfort to your client - the owner of Miami Center I Existing. `F S incerely, Rodriguez, Director anning Department SR/JWM/rj cc: Walter L. Pierce, Assistant City Manager Lucia A. Dougherty, City Attorney, Law Department ATTN: Christopher Korge, Assistant City Attorney Aurelio Perez-Lugones, Director, Planning and S Zoning Boards Administration John Lefley, Planning Department .-Jack Osterholt, Executive Director, South Florida Regional Planning Council Anthony J. O'Donnell Greenberg, Traurig et al Page 2 of 2 . z tt,x Planning Advisory Board , MTF June 16, 1986 Suppl ementary Distribution: Miami Center '/Biscayne Plaza For Meeting of June 18, 1966 o odriguez E ive Secretary z Planning Advisory Board S :4E5 s Our apologies for this supplementary distribution for Miami" Center I/Biscayne, Plaza, which is as follows: 1. Comparison Table: SFRPC; Planning; Wirth/Minsky; and Steel, Hector, Davis. 2: Figure 7: Timeline - h' SR/JW/rj �i •_ ._ i 5 _ .;� t 7 i ' '. i I r ,t .� w i �k *, :� S' �. •i et n � 4 k � r �r er.tttimm. in sastfst, mom #am" JNo%r M uvmuw out ' err v a••terslaew rewNq.rt ea.-a;h aw.17 a1 aVS ". .w.ltt "ate aft Co-,, e,ev...as:s.a.t cw.rtr'c.tar aatw/ " awlar aw.er,trtbn err to brae "Nor" :w a" Was +Ira wMaa+Nrr *gwrlet * ar reveet,/rr Vtlfacts are .esa armi. we aa.wit hate we tee t; %I.t roe VaaVvsprd. N,Itlala of into" we nKwPft ate sift. 11 lst wttww. Its smutum. A1" afilfas iwwty ems satwag teeth fairime m 1. daew all larmitre seek ►tans from W Project site a as site is cotred. W we soft tow PINK /Melee oattolq M Attslos.t 1 to Idro tAlect kadsupteg. . I. silt a Mafdsspel aresomiW64 ae-site •wins all ewthw•, Malay $tote d tare► reewdsstpists of esaervcties taefefa. dell astrstttea as, to town wMM to asp 10`08 At" P~1&111 tlplfka g mistrk Or rtemislglCdl artifacts reo stemmed. aaa Per a rodsemrle also d to a women, calealatsd to .lotemi am lotrfarme with Constriction, pool state tmd Islas %pork p►aenatkw e/fkkls is wiry aid eKaaN• tee sir. d. air a tow Ileaaef of a Mt" porelt far Phase 1, prplde foods as dslmtlt or a prhravm um te on ateat of MAN. d statistics. miles two ralkaes' [ands. and complete vier is tow Issaews of a Certificate of fasanacy for $#leave posts Pun 1, tow Matson wed premise fpnotara, lyatlos d laadstelq P.rs.Mt to city M Mom sbarmilt sed sapep gem" sow lldrdo flow bspallsa) to effect at too Cis of dram of this Ii "IoN M f►dsr. as applicant will datp we m#rremalk mad alscaM runes space, to e11" vim his arms frmi Private atleltom do. Atlo /mito►1as oeroprlpe NNk an of the sovrvals. /lsal lowered plane for the H.t.sah we @*Joel to its oDtegs of tow Placing oertart. to cwwltat#ea with am /W Aprteaot, Mir to the lowme of a WIWI*$ Well. the dplkaM small le[arPVato. 1st star t of prsuroo visa.. a Voltw. W :4.40 aryls "We fled of side"% ideas. restawsats ae other retail are so are or" MUdtatety adlacpt too the abe►ma% treat abets/ loclolN M Mat awes lam" of Cdltla it. at tea asset M war 11. low City .111 ovsetltdo tow ra«Ilro mt of a prirwr a awn is one amass It Isaim to Vermont ant too Q# It. If d~ b toetrwallwtt sill .. so goo". Ilhe flvrelt eaeenat d sups oil eslotowte q'wusst Ms! Mom r•skmily rMIMO Is COMMON I, tahtwit •a• of pas Riles at Order. a soul. ODD Dfy*1A . t1D satt$sffDD mom asslam. JOlelfLf Yg fQQ- sm[LLUMAL 1. somow all laraetwe oaelta planes gem the project site am the strip to olwtd sd small Oars only twos Wane dpmsis* apeslfted Is attecumt I owreto 14 fetage project 1•sdeaSples. , 3. use a professional archo"l"lst aw-site deal" all aorta- Oeewp mstlry state and Clearly eachaaotoposte of emetrwtlon scftsdwla, delay cswatreatlas as to am netge Is a" seas amov, potentially aiplfteast glataele oar alcgsa a"Ical artifacts are vwceverd. sad rear a goeemeate tons and to a answer colcalstaid to slmlelas aq interference with aan- Stlectlon. Pratt seats and teal glelerle peenasaatiw officials tit sdrvy ad escavate tow site. a. trier to tan isewwseo a a Dmltal p fymlt to fowdo 1. provide a prferssmaa teed IN taw, awn" of 1sdm.fN fee else om"rmstloo e1 a Dlverwasa so taw 1st• Somehow melmmM- /paaatoraos ssasmest slrsNy rase/red to hit aNlCsesd its taw tors of this fmvetoo e it ftder /taw •sl.wa.mlg•j• "file&" afall ptevtda. at Its sale esmt. logeltuO. Meet - le$ ad tewdweglq of s ey"Itty ad sent" consistent with the City of glad slvermeth ad Daynala Golan ded standards Ithe •41oldellms•1 to effect at the tan of ~too of tale Owvelopnwt Order. applleast small Moat tonal taaderen plana lea the slworwala to is* 114stnp apaftset ad tow planes/sat "games Stall. Is coamstatiom Oita the fire De tome, review "is laareeap pleas to Ord" to deter - OEM Oowtowr war Not said plea ate nsiKdwt with tam OdUllaas. tt sow l0000@W via" ace emmetatent wits, as Owldellm". the tlamelsf Dspartibm pall asters" tam. it tN 1msioup pies wow wet continental: Oita taw deiblteas. too nowt" O@Wtmm t any ether epees or aleeppeovm tans tf tow Aasakadp pusi ate dlagpgewad. tow namosUtt *""tam% sown pro poly stare was any age ins atfw tsh,st is fsllanfel IOWA@" late the 'as+tassawa' 3.Ca:oe � ego Development Oarar. AWAoat r1all. as /a air empeama. feorsM ell answwar73 semmresm is rower to so, — ow mitten* my saragem mgfowtw 34 tow 2 1 1 ase®taastiawo. aVSMSs awsVKr mi►aafarmoa 'ad toleropmo fjasw as no o eW tafpay. ensue Meg=". 'mimwaty aewsrf dsapms/ served, Sear *case" Syeoawn as gars C7teler manages. S WAsese man 1 4 343 mms . meemetee In ease, I,m a frills sAa AMIsalmis safmo. Standards. twpmtlaSwws. wool anYl amwSttsrmaseel. sets swwawww.dae site euelawsttsm prasasoae. 3. 3. the laws flan sa COMUSSas 1. :;Iwlato " net )a 'umbit 'se, of this SMAepmtat *wows. 30 ' 3"d attenuation "of as nosiest arwmtap+w odor decor noy ids.:. 1t9M. •a. to the used psroo►apf as fogs 3, folete the .-r I 'agagegtsp{. Oft.K tam Dlswsemlo. - y 'V;��4,:� ,.-.: - ,. ,:,... --�.r; - ... , ......, : �..... ,..x.-,.•.ckho�*s3�iZ5Y��,�t`i4 c"'� .�t�"t �a...,,�:Y, �.r,. ,- ..... .- -.. I I 1 1] 4w;r• etaw+w,, eat "0"00a pv #Wft w -owomw . r .ta 'M Mtwetg a.a4wapr e Plwa rtP-,Mp. IwlrwP &Mt.Y w 1rtR IM.MPP Pt PrMPM •ettn 0. 40 MolarMHlra. woosta low" N Mo pp. r C.MP,ws PpspMat or#s w tss WN ! too Mf fate do* wawa a.Ma .w a."- M slwawa Was.tat M fs wsa. • owj,M aft vMMrt Na. a 1e•mr fills 4'014. w alfat•af .•.. Palest' wa.aap wprw M MwMaa alp pt r...M., aHs, 1. eat Mot. S. flow to M MtM1w at f lsiMl.q well fe, Haaws ON" Map 1. POWs " w a ItMfanlftfe bw o tat alrwt M IMl tot .4 esMMRi, wool 01 oWkeMs ktp. M tM11Mt grow M Of IVAW" M s tKtltltMt or st2Mr.tt too, M.taras RM ►Mw 1. a tar" sap talae ktl►esy, fit wwtt. a aaar Ism". NpookaM wtawt. lersotrfal. I1/Mtol M fairish" M to sstlawif of M S. pears . iMp11..tM #o0o4M# M w aasat w .M iws 14w aw.$" t.rfwt w.w _ AWOO if fo HMiol fowMlMt It Mt" MMMM/ ilat wM 14e0" Hpi toot of Of afrat &Mott! o Its Peaat Is M#WMfol its ts/1 at W F&jlts M "W" M4wirew rawftiff. /alfk'r kb k ttlpbw arn+aM o CaMite.a f, twott 'a' M t►is twMAatM lrrr. M s1eMkM1• G. fYt"Im" lI M11". o as Cik, law* Use aeroaaaae M Sao"" M. Moor o isa owsetw w a oi4fol rwsti Its, tlx.rw ►taw #seta 1t it %off "WSW$ am wM /w& welmm If M 4111,1011 s/Moit la W pox" Is wpWatol tat .u+•MPe wl► at fro palest sa o a.safp Mit111erto it awes paw —ilk. for pa as,MPsae. a/ w1 Ptlwl al all M fall Oatk (M Mtm*." It. t. pssg% w&Mrwt, w Mta4M "a wa-fatw aN pwm 401M to apt aw Mlaaol etseMw. faro M cMovd"IM at 81ata Plus. Olaf aif.pia. wsfwvt 6" w Boor aerelw/ to erwlst 411M&rrfr so tsMtk c11r+a11M .ttatr k is ay. Ceawaet lr..Maa I al.i w tan Ws. at lone w fall awe ifw. skol tat watts+ Mt saettw. Woom e, M w slo. M.rM M ..s I# Nw a A.,— seer, ,..1.1,, w .axtr.,,: isms ,rQwt we4ol1 111tM. M attrlMw a.p wit IW4WM Naas la tat Mo'sm alPllea.M fw MMvolmalt "w.1. a"" a" M N/ aims" flea—%ft..atw twa.P of a4 tnta, tawttwtw, o a twttwf ♦MMpIiM, w PM.sot w/ as .11 .Mop►. M /matt Wool Waste. , �. ►eMt 6 tat tsaanvM .t a HartltlaaM ft Nss'soe/ M tfsaaaaa tips p%@" -1. O W&OW2 M&&&. M its. aMo MM. MSMerMM aY Momplem M tffroetats tww pHs IOallowt Itself, &a M *AM faMMeM. "WIGS. ifMfMap. IWI" aaf/M MMM#) to to M #atop&& pot of tat Pesloat, tt M NjaaMt M it. faMfMett wad at a. eoaatas aviation" f.staMaaaf. go MYMIM at *waft loamn aeai& M &*$Wt M ,ft aWSW" K as NMsts' somweeefe. "to al'morrs& . foil MM M oMafvMMtit aitMile M aMla'M. '. M W IMt MMI at. CMMaM/ 16 eoaaM tse .a,Me a4W►a 'a• et 1E14 206619VWA s 4~. M rmeo! ML *-bottom 4W Me MAMMA MMttPaW swap Aattf MY 20. s1nr: S. tM/ttto tb amm"Matat of'IafyaM aavea. Wistat oW& time ty'uy. ""Wall awso M MNe Ntt4Ms to /rCita/t:. •ltltfatt of ssMeeaM latHrMHkaa aMMft IM4 aft 9". V. awl"" Wit fMlt&. eoastrtet. aft volatile tow •saMM• ..atM aaaaa— ."two to oaM oaf ealialiq mtaMsts. fase,aet pesa em tars if 1496iMt, at leapt aft lama t/Mt'raft. slot the "star& aft sletsrm pr1sKM at is sites. . aM&H tat a"Off Its & 24-psa, trait s•slH. MM eat- attsw low s,alMap aptma to oaMetLMe efts all e.ponowmMltas is tat aMMtt Amic stlsa fat eew►.a- w too Os.eswbp�et. IF /ettrItelso trip"* Coo issue or f. isaagerote go" too dwtldposst. beenttlwtve aeeessot . i . MA•• age sea sgaetwpi..tgaal7 Nto rasrw wish r ueNt aroolosU. has«ore gtertels M"w pryeeatsay Mt"so. aid red seats w "to graoae•ts. aotwbsg mmiae eestfto trMr•twe.trq Isles Mateo Ig •sours itaeatep/Mtaeel.p eels aePesu" aaro. at a swats". rave statrw wilt ' ptsseetifa. adebpwise. aed go""" Masbtb. " • .et4 do salts ..stag.. or" woo, w..a•.• +. ear "At, . 1 4pYue fhst cross dthb tg1111ap haft" Warsaw aatsrtatt w aUalsea* thaes aoa•perda aha11t rNnapa w w. afg•R. W"M waste" an to u a". /)FWAA ON, "arm -$use 1• ftwits that see uW Male hdltlo" ""go amine g *1M kprvkn #pout. oftUd balae. Iwo"fete wteilate ofhaMrdots atstN age ee ha toad. pasgrKed. • trr•►ptf ass eerarsae ••safe Ot iin•raa-• waerlw• OFtpsireflM .• p staism" aft /s/litas toast" of I" lolls w Swap. or totted owl be me ad sett" telecasters, paws. . p naMs•te ' e •wlrs oil swa«atf raw - "assert"dw"wt gift a h'saira test the bwtwvmuMf" of they bit~ ea roil V Werse"e ante %mll tsar to a tasted btllg/al/sMtq M Ott s wlttrst drat". to @note costainowt a" to tadillob - else=* at oar spill or looks". i ! tsalao erM4 r •.Leer Israere sae+• atasaw "minor -•011 blast d sass set essential to thepaJW Masada OF sour be)a1t• that the taedlq/wlowip •t Yy ba•td• 1Ms- _ araesselof late let ate so "Ids as.bo•Cost�/a s��tpw ifaatt. rtel w haasrlaw rasa ohall attar Ds • awstlM - • of we or wee kwlo"lep low of aC =4pfM or serer fevolttt aft outside •twos of buwdass "erlab w 4ewor -acts. to"io§Awtmdi" had with s GI cestaltstst etas eft- �,, aswrogte grog .altgpggwi rgt•Nwl &M— all am~ taste "WOWS to t•Mrect welts a Ilaseesa aRlesrtea to the $*elect desist" of "ow oywes.- �' public or pin% WardM awls SIW"l Woke Or ON@ if" Ifaslblt an outside atta" at associates aot•easto N .. . '. - •. .r y.tM.t facility M to ftaew to as gaff Coos? aloalem d t•.s.eswsta/ haasrdges outs. _ _ _ t ta/Psaet tg ► won -Islas t•wroa.s wit oswoowtr tlwertoe ft"pe•sl IKMI tabs of er Of tips fall.-Iy iwat M ""its all hauriw• "no emnstoto to aoeteaa dfb• - lailleft of al ostkll of orsper refe►able "alto ap"sm t Pratocrel liesaaed polio atltitata baratbee waste di pn" sue• - - s gabf!wgtlgt of rouser of owwegig err a newt« or s - o Wstttea onto suiUent a/su toa parMltM eWM'ft-i onto aMgoeset vice or pnsoaslas facility old to provide to am fed" .. . - gaped aets•"ap. arrp Hon. /fa w - • ttefhtlntis Of egcslpt Of aMrwla five, • r•ryCte_w • lasete sty ftpgt•Nt of amitae out aZS- go" rose m - *KWW gwrttw. Item) Owes of a" of tam toliowlee (etas of awnwo - w owitr last 'tests "Wersq treed •• .+t •agwtaou f« aetfy or tow* prstlq wastes of sea Penalties far, loots _ ties of pgqu hagoods "onto tsateNest peonies" ageraarr Bltp•stl at sMgr'ttwe wet haw► ft tatflr - - 1!/aerel of Wetdeee ante owes"to SKtlp aft-M. flwods • 6~40" onto witNte dated •f Mlpsast to o pieta/toed trrssMao "stet saw• ... E a",M. sister tow-tga.1180111418 Ytasalas. apespgt tiome goIV tgstlrgetles of samlpt •t eststlala tree a wy'gi=4 • g•/•t •taaw e,", •testa tor/ciil"o, •r saw' -soles or haw .� sllak primate acts to gwwft aid togliliks forrtltwaap IV out w a auto aatWp epueialt. age, sw Cowper MM. and tawlu on N wiI • #WAS City. ties tads taper tie*. w the fbroas M«twat of (ouMtertsl notify say tssaet paatsttap "acid at the powitsai bt .eon .pie ite.•tapmw fro« fee ail npiklN low see SWatbt it "we eMtlsen with seh Mwlalwt Order. aft sot up"" dlgkast of "garde" pats Vermont to bo- ttteolsngss. ►two% los aft roplaswn. ties 401J11. flarlds StltwtN. " fw w owwm of sets bea/opiwt w a •"Vass waste vw&W alum tossoeohle aeceaa•to estords a" facilities bg - - fr toe WOM we woe o•.o•gleow aster. a 1eetor0 on" aelt by defuld as toe ypllcsst ad my tenant of w lyplkat seR a itwip b tha city. b . a" too ritslds bgwtasw ' pawrtar OWI tie deteaas r "0 4W"W as ter .stall wove .slit haw • SK Cott fitted Io Ott ntgagt 1 Ntgrwed W.!g w of 6wlftlawatal sapalat/sea to osNce orpllsa•a *its .. ... ._ @Fk wit err a sit onto natal is leealbts r *new Morals we isr«srgtq tegnM tie rgesrtteo, w towgut. testa. « }oeratn tale ttt+elapeot Crdot. aid all aw/lrable lawn ad ["S ' 6'•Mrpl7etlet= tpM•w of •etaraltasr ice hues r1i. eterr. OF "too$i cent/. ourdesi ont4i areMIMd H I9I1too1•. COII•pe/at/N•. .. .. ... �}. CG' "Wrtt ftanoo "a"*. � Mgftt rt fYl-M • flier Usk. orra•CtM main. /"lids* tale" .M111iN to UtiCwalgt d/ on on il.tpeM• •[ tote patelapewt Otdw. • hafYdoue .... •.+�C: loM/ndo, aM' wvw. •Rue. r flow" meow. #moo" praelAa. teMta►. eon tr sues is NIKIeMt ) and tie wasted i, "no enumew suit he "flow as "0 twitsmt OW ow yid tptttrdoe is rokew tf pnow p. Statute.•Mo is sees sotawt alitlrgt • shall beslaettaiet-sty awkward "go tow Million or ttlgrw, of tM amalgam that fail& MARC a sic NM alwN - pelnMii f 406. we amp" is irtwft f Owl he ao•ar•atowetr of a" or all of foe filled WWI. rtOI or gain N swowo to tie to attaebwat i attacked beget• seed Ruwptated "Code by- wwgeR e*R relrattHwa s Mdl•t N err w wl. A A gbgo. `CNMI? w National •ate titasieen f•sollas' Wedowee" IV. telecasts. a" tame aoea. stages. at peswrates "owes" . r sets►. roulettes. or own( or aroefew of lb4 ftwfy see false"" Isb bb M11.41421), ftwido splatttrstt.w Coo. wooded. p•tstdaes wastes are da ime es Ignitable. owes - *met-" Oahe j° +' Iltlara«eras ~ ^~� give. testa. Of reactive settled. tesledlep takes tautioud "A." fire* OT4".bgtt. hrMa OWOVOrethe Colo. ._ _ _ - is sRRawwt Ina provided. fesaros. that ties eats Is atteo► ;. ' ..5 asset a sea/ tied owes is astooesast s mail to si lltsolo. y '**Mal• get melee severe •wwae 0"0 /hie arable wte r +fit _ .,,. � - , .. *Nip •web/ oyen. tap addition es delwles at ow or all so :al1R b o powsr,. agile Mt Gist ions Peatr tracer asaaf•wr so tat listed sus, aatwtals, w fasts* by MOO*" b eels tirethM f us 4e.,* 0 14 ts=ts•cgpp. 't?saeq oed etNwl sere• iaeseasew dtedkitaes' taaespe• � r _ _ toned h fenwes Iwo Mie ami.eiljail piwib re ablalettst/" Code.S, ': ,� ar>a . .., •; ra.trtb.wa we reltree seer pare. a orwwwwow IT tag Clot ter fees t=Il Klee. te+tarreee Oetw pry M wen Ian Osparfawart M wmwe twit M*•awteee pip Moe v Motor@$ we kaorw oo faro PQNr @aye we afaaerwgam. ._. 041a torte Net "0 64" m oaW no to ohe ms 8 mwlov warm ens, awe orrov" testa the amiLe go own.M N pia vrejecs- am 1 wt saes CI IT. Of MM a" taw of the O" Mtl o Vela of were to.etsp.m tier. mete• bra w Oprings, Ns rte Mesa %so son so ewrrfb►e a fofr awe df eeela settee fwltlflao esww to rmaeesa Cloy eparws. Qwtr Sol* men Otlh the City to sat. Nees a !lit "awe of twitee Anal$it Nf rwpirw on rertae aseewto Ifs arvla to fat otojW. W. it two Of tareetl.a. get a fair mare GW asom we w.•dI is do ww/,a Clef :"in# fa wpe.ewae awe E tort oarslts. to am" igaof Poo ordswaq" Is @OWN$ A Kim 90,0"1.rug ti.aw Semite"" me ws,wnett tar men" f- lr.M savor" "wed Of opw. amod. "Stelm& aiMfy t" ae.atatawa,t. ss-oft. Gen stile w seewly g. ptlr le IsomNe of a Wilily 0001 fen &1Kapr "*a Apace a. talc► tam as pr""f"o &so the uy le smarten" a fair Mtn Ise CMINI fwtlliks required N raid@ seem* Is" w.fce to as project if rmo d y us City. or. M the slt~he, game a fair owe caatlamoap owls" N SO MOWW City Iliad fee mrdsesw eMtalakil Is fee* set+rue. If I" Fact ON oNf.aice it adopted y eta cur rlar N rNMfy artafkaN of aCcwKl far WO 00 illegal pest NwO flit of d@wellatsat or. So go alternative. If area saNct to Is aalptd OF tie City t►Ichar mottle the ant s Fear Is water. ecldwy akaly deMMpral p.tlN. M. Collabp sgo with as City of Phu" fan ggwtarl to psfre "a gnWfd@ fire %Maly /emrM are awwwraM fala the preJKI dnlr of twNtwtua4 ttearps the Approval of wo.strattwae ow~s by w Ilse partial. It. Collibarde with the City at was police oswtan to McerpraN @@Moo$ Mtsrly saerN ad@ tygLM into the d@ttp ad@ geratie M the project. no ANticpl colt I"t the prolaelswy rodspe "paid by khtekbo-19W. &C%ltwtle dated Jsavy sl; Mal M W Alan $owls" mothM Ili des of no otfwttve dale mo this seder.[ prdar, Ae Police DWOU t sap r&Mtt acre Ma111f tatafwtle aaewM -6 any. n these otka. d" oroo'w* a satoy po Warily row . The Applkea shalt rallied to the melody NfrMMal. is wades. we ps N wet atilt the rwa nwaft" of as Polaca sa*wtot %ea bee Mcorperstd law the anfp automate ad awake M W praJatl. par N its isKe of gay W1NIy prat. It. rrur to the isteaece of a aelNlwp #trait her grt:gho tlaoa thew 1. eaten Itla to womat rtla tie Polite aawwtaMt N coetrib to a ba owe N polke capital facilities as@" to tv"I'a Clay rmatwat. as d$#SMMf by the City. W. Is the allwaeitte. Amy a fast two cwarianiee 81 to M Ntpted City bo ws in erdiapce aortalaey N elke facilities. If meth lgmt in rdlheaee is Nutty %r the City prior to satahHp certificates of occepoty for ew* lap Vision pins "we tot Of dtwl"mo or. iO the eater["[Hen. If tab Fact Sao Is adipw by tap City eethts the hest s fears. dlchaer is *rake. OubNy darNoI I "-sits. as. ar*esd@ Mtww ad raw tomes a tltw Or base M ten taws. doriey W a owl M the Mnkal smntnctle of isfueyhe plus. If nNkred by the city, for a ceewketts" pipna p1 64owtoy stryMheo for the City's asaryaay coil kdko lystma. sold amteme od fawrtoom". lsptMo with necessary trvkn 0018 W n City of Mena OmMM. No goiksat shell recalls tee ripe of arAllKNral strrcbtal oM epletwNy appraat ale said **me small "a smNN the fed slre.ea below. 1. name to l"wmn me a Ms1tR1& Nrde 1me aleasyoo *taw Mae" a. "tog wo an &rummest Vlta the City to aestlfkbwe a cote Maio for capital facilities replied to pcee/b adepate licit servtee to the flows. Is. Cooperate with the City of Miami firm oewtwt to Mesta that awe"late flea "rely meaenfes ago twwpwat" testa the project Roslyn am tomottaecles. Cseatrtietiom MerMtd Malt be NbJeet to the appeofal of the rats mesa&&. H. Cooperate with the City of Miami blip opeetsest to isaw- pmeats adowto sa"%rity essences and oyatema into W Res/pl a*& apurt/w of Mloaapno ptaas. yplteao" owl "able the door/p automatic dreslap prepared by *Mioitame- -MpQ. Asaateesta. dots& Jatsesty 11. 114116, as arose" alp dtesl&s dated if a. tm to the polies Wpattcant Vitals *Ito lentM after tow adoption Of ttte lotslog oot otMe. Sin lodge mpg"taest may repent saes detailed eonetsaetisn documents ado&. at tboic "owes. may gropers a sa ety ad@ "Welty roport. Applleese $"at. apes "mattes topes" so the estimates. ldas the ptemnlme &pa"tsene me ben .a" to %tat "tow two csoo=""Iio" of too foilee gepttswmt. 1t a". tilts boee Incorporates Into tam design am patatiaa ad olsear o plasm. 13. feast to the looms" of a Nildi& h"slt cot ltensyes pies. $bean 1. Aypite"t @"at. If excised y the City. oaI late an &calmest with the City to wclb"e a fair stare of Ntslee ropltat facilities amwdsd to coeslse Clt' e a em "o"o"ty uelib"Al* to ateompmV hoes. is. to tgdree b the City. ypticest stall prottds. *"see and a* port me the Initial cesottentse me ltotoyse plats. into - saw of tool *pane tat applicaat•s dametet/ass ON sate[ cc Smith of the pain"* fee a Lamm oicatises estame eat tar . call-* ammcpsey emutcaties *gates. &old est*esa and gpetsesstw. topether with aoeos"cy oectsow. Asia be at City me Wiwi *agent*. 1b WICast *pals Cortese tie iris" of acc altettmral. attecteral W #&tansies ay "ll. mmn tow canoed" Ammon" lob air adott WA gecweatq' gortiw d the loreaa"amA debrw Amilem a •sit. as /b ab Oman". "I xtam "" OMWA M as Ogden M "-,gilt am sausate My aomtoo 9"="o as tsy po"oow oa*ag/setlam d pia shoo in ba ;oaseatiees ad atowuwm me land Camas museum*. to meawdeme vstb ail ,m m mMb Ode*. sWMada. gold O!& emphna 1" '°m a. to the Ceneth line OR Comfit_" :J atttr tf!* .e. t Y►ty'. Chao" the cawne to a paclsol ad@ rowdM :w :fra:rrrf as psfserapa " lesion, 'it as Impose; Q" Ordinance gereec-,af to pals" facilities to dmpl"d by ohs tlty vitals Tbo neat t:.a yome0. Applicant say, in thin alternative. POT a fair etas" , fiboties pwra%est to nth ~oil impact Qe* nf�iM1�9• S. Ps ohs Qwie Qif Sine hQ Cewd123aw 9, sf+enge :1`e toes after 'Chap' to a ysfied .amd re,ard %no ze"fnder of :na perogesph as follows, 'It an laps"[ fee Ordinance yerte.alng to it" am"" to adepud" as City Wittlel the aesm tics years. awll*ea say. is the Oit*eaatl*e. POT a Age obsfs tewta:hetetOn pwwoeast to swb upon toe efRiaefa'• i t • Oft %aomit $ ultra Madawaska emmm tea qs eerGogtledel s. 6t um flaw"tar M Olt ""PON" pegs@ 4 clot wit loos'$! oral id/ a lteyp.I►don ells R MAGoeeI. s. ear Atltttpentp mNMa .!eriabte Mr mReYg *rlsaae. 10 seagN/e. a. gdeleen Gor owtom" saw" an"Fwla am,,* 110.0 to wwalfs late Ma r a" to 290.210 aarg Goal. sr 11.0 to go to " law Map sera Mr. m. flat sr'eavehl ewa omf 0040e1 low"I f. afar lgliq. stt.t Iltwae G.l Or qlitters area. *. Gmparowlaw a 4'row *meet costae is Gol a" -Morse ow to ~900. ..+vn 0r w drr w +.-e.s-.ea .sera. ta+oee to, ce"j" ON meow veiled le rwtimra.S. ~0 tase'616. a1. Sole, Water Mahe r tale Memo rowwwr molt* a It~ ade4.0 a" "ewer tut Water le MOGWn.a. ode.. we f mile. ,. -W Wow aenlwrGoM'se al later Iwtw test ones wtOrt ar ,Wells Aug "a coo$~ rest Make. e. t./Ra1Mr aatw Hsu M a.a IAltllaea e/t *edmrs R rq asw whir atelir '"We al me owe."lo woe ate am~# OOW* Mr time,. M. tdeesesao de tako" oww coarsm um an"" ate on •wlt/Itrtt ' " M rates Iletlstlu/ at asr amotti/u0 sssiams to am doll ttaMM eat to a Ikr.afr•I%r basis at e%iM). •. !M HWMet/aM lMq arfok some "M! "sal. N feadgk. c. r$fsr eon 9a@t44a$0 oasrys sff/cleettl tIN) N N.0 to MM6 p No 00 OF pall to INAN pta0 feet. ad 12.0 fa %GUMP law 170.OM 1*00 11i. 0. fte ~I" am as mvmmt (c ostq. a" aaeass& efc.) taste$@ from Of cmill as grgaa. a. fonswaa dlaIdu cowsl so"" a all $trmttures New is igNa. I. ideal Ps Or etbe MFOMctrig Oro sarc@a fe pally so dow make to ralendts. m is a /Neale. g. S*Ir Nor "Owl So O"te bat rspMrf Malts to Malt coo$o a@ sum" let ages, Is muwmts, e1c.. Wry tetaabk. A. Net outs, MIdRMwti as d 7 Sold. leCla dsrl dllmwa of Ialltl cam see pe.@aei ramirlam S. 1, torewf "ter Its. of 0.0 Allen W @-A@ or age$ Inn eggs, Clem$ age sea to Agee fade three w o".aolf "SIM ar 01.0. ). thn" elect to Valet* to Samoa of sheet twtlids auto air twetwus rage. a. u*t-Mts"A" swr lifts atrw dell ON too %VFW". Cash ata► sb"rµea corlltcle"s less tan or Waal to me. I. 1loctfkH agtariy as a flur.y.famr bmis. teWatori"@ -100 •moat orstaa cook of "artiste atltntlw. fted" Isrdtq. Isptlae iatrgl, a@ "Mal cares.-- . ! stst=M ~00 to plat of onto camplletco wa0 sled plum Free an •poem(/l regomthl* for Y@ ant". of as OgOpiges. P, "I so !%twice$ lope" wall be fllae @r$r IS, M otwoom M e No" Pow$ Per *W owe M Olameme ►IY*. p. notes w ►M1aMS106 #too me car* am Sommer d solo momf*omr aalarlww Got """how s,al. - ' - t s. ttpt-.gas tesrsab wale 1W aaahe awl as rase serious. - - - ":.-. Val! now oaMNtlos wNt%%a!t lets red R *cocoa +. f..W#Aa M1r$o ad 0 Male. - t .. _ -T• U;0" **Iwt 110ea osmonnow or" anti: M ~lpma ad. tdae"Weae the followiso &torsi saatwtwo Downes it" Sled aea""Omtl m. Valid"" ft"Abilltl of Gilt on"itloa►Mg attion ar e L salt of 04 areas ton s dart-y-tlAde mold at *sag- b. het ol*trihstlw "too isciadl• der roieaa spt•Ga, to readable. e. rlsioea all wdt9ttsal" on•egt otflsiasles /Batt so 14.0 to lalldls" toss tbm *a Opal to no.011e derte goer. aced 12.0 to buildings owed as@.ae pascal goes. d. Mat ocalisclal areas aed a,dpest Ia*hlss. am trol- ly. eta.) Isolated fr® some eamoltlaa" aeon. a. cotptwin" alsmoter whet states is e41 "toast" soot to stmolon. f. Natural ON or Other sea-otwtete aergt wren Ia •slte0 and meter hoetlne to rostawaate. Mar* coo- _ alit•. - g. Mtw Mat" bont•re in wart• heat recovery unite to of~% onalas and WOahloe art "met to teyewrasta. ate.. Mare feasible. e. Mt sates tomperdteres ant a M betar 100eo some altemN bur bseltb , I - ad pelposat covinrate. 1. Lamaterf, wear flow 00 a.• gslleee ?as MAW ON loom !tomes aster es"dte that sae cob sago thew three ad deo- bit pliees felt !taus. ). llatM Itea to gsaga• the colons of @tress sallot •uerlse Sac annotated" arw. f. Lyht-tellonloo *Wet 111M win" wall age God "944 e. with some alatoilon Adotglalono 1*" taco ar mpg to ewe. 1. staettical eos41009 ea a !long -by -flat boals. a. Cagotorite0 emerge soeso e t @seta egaete of easet- etao Optimization. demo Iimesse. liquids oo"tot. ad *Mal ca nsol. . A ot"SMM SbMitf that Of dotlgs COW1aen wlth taco n►tomb. fro the onstaeetles gomrg IbL* tog domiOa of oho seshmMal. photo sed olonetial ev@tw. able be filed with time tldeup Deport"" Org•g to tam • losoedge of a emildioo aatMt got *act pas* at 4aeotw @lags. s } Aawl'I+ War' Oodsof IIS" alevet. we taw.spwe w Mewtay tea.! w teethe! Mep aw 44aMea he OL Mdpplraa the aalioelat "" as pslttt awM r4 foorwko to yttte.. d...r .r el�...r•.t.. _ , tf. twdfpfKo tteo ft/twlN I.m the pater Nelp 4M ep4rN -w. w ste.ew.w New N pulse. e.e,1k. ao oftauwlr re wa/wke $*mi .4s "feet. VNfk.� aw kt aew[1wso egos to KSa/N tsa ewwl.44w 4e1Pwa of pa/oet tt.tfte. aeweNM/ Olt eoK .0mok . V .ter heists, pile!" N404r. a all 4ee1117t ontpo t thew so N N•t110 dwkvw 0"110 Mww. f.*" w aas ato swestral pllw4ot oslsolaN. Me also swl5tyl _.. +Nip.te the" pl►a" et N•sata ato ea.pois e.ra asses. N wr•�IN aate.ra ae.ttat ,seat.. a w teas w it14 h1 Nae•a. M M IN ewe! p10 M tMr r PM%tt w !Yews ad WW" ae Ia . far .wiw/w 1 ptwl N eases dos, s #toae"m ati .steoe. laaxtal N alaN N yawiNa ea ala..:ae a" r...waok. yr taIw.r a.•w. ar -Wake ae. .[the/y 4ws...p go t' Ou co, sea to /`Steles 4a "461/p.y s 6.1144M sat..Ns. fat awtattw d'pS acts"l7 docs4tm. osa $--a cot ded "a pally of e M/rer a a.reN aw arias! at " rr lewly iv cr owl Weeks!"oo/a► 00.16 satmi all, efama". a4 ort"Weer room M Ka4Yk "taSloslm a dal pal tNatftti" profs,. atrr..ot.t a 4a. Oat tar r.w.a tr.tr.d. - /itawwew N samallost mcotes" thewada the psrect. d,rtso slt'or.te. aset.~.. a" metrawaner aatN a" - Odkoftle Iotatmal" to CBae4.ta.4 latatfNa toras/.okt IL r w art am t% 4 011," la..e !shag mm- Is . owes" 4s.p e tr.aa t0erwell. aw eN. sal ee.takee, -we am Now$ be he U"RMma m the M 14ta•t ew" dlwa u Oara4 IItl1. eMfwl Y tbo polrt. U.. aataaatt..rlttad 3Nf� sleet/ teal u.at ,t,Il ..y+apar Ia estaalaaa N.Nane aMwaaaes ma Palo"- ,. . peat I w itA ewwteok of tot Illa1 task" seer. M the seek", "leutaaes a. a. soktptett pokim !soilAuer for .t to pre". two. as/p ONtewtrat r ow mot ptwhela aawcl W 16. to .b ewt Of 'gt11e4N losses fta ptalet apwa i. o pools! ptap N be 4aNC[Ktal A ar " the tbos. plaostbe Slate pate/m estwi yraaa". sates,. ties 3f aTeircant 4paa t• MK.ra awerW. aM.ao. the a/refs pitlt paiws w w p "loaaa oweat 61406 is oakf t am4a s" iili a 1-1"3" ca.dateoo fate t.to ass yet.oM "oes.. Sato ...et. -. awakl tV.p, lrlsct re the .wetheaolu N It. ckf N Mas W po lookt, book Witt N t0e NN Ieda/atoly 44%0=k ok aaat.teaa sot tfw aead as 'aeo serer : tokdts at .i are a.lertelat N r.altc d..e M laMt u ter lataw. N . lewlsl revel m a."w 04 Is Sof7.tt to 4" No". Flats p.laat ass ac,4`e a'-"- rKmwa. clots, 6ldelas 1. aesr�a also a" -,I.e. C- a/ ss she tart city t o ttaheeecr .w e.a.er N MN sasltnK emit fwlf. 4rlg..M *-$test As ,sail sadow t. sat aoslwaalos al tewarDetaar raceroal sod " pelk IIt4111tr "weeks to to frataA of lee spottiest. (Us aim t.NplaK l sclss sseaartlos NK .oa. 710torw 4okl4taN. *#tmi.& te4arft SmalliDdaa .t pos 3347 .f sae aeseae k - mwltM it a. fWa'M N Lrl et aeeerll arf.r, a attawa)• . sal kit tbo always #1416 palest a" tie all.roe s.`aeft " a." g aw7. 71w14a. a1HleNt ai..li pr.e3a. bollasop, t lewt to sae rocra."4tlos of tat Ctty al a1Ni eaa -to) K okra a.etae LefN:iM +ego aata.tatrtaa • ""strait al fNila ".as a" e"laat is t0e Awksare of a ,rids to Wake ' gealsl pualt OF tie afNl city C ol"tat dpCttli" lrwt 41N. 7yNN1 .1Nradca. aN arawt at pOtic l/.Silty Saw,- IN. 40.1 aeta4M to mi. aawltprt a".. Ha. aw/tl re satlwr+ 7A1 KrN or s Impost (fa -Ile aeM .e sap. a.erg4aaKc yaaalta Sam" prat4ot Oatsl.. nbo13 ISeI et. soft" N. a.araaae Sao ryatdyFaet wok .n'me" a I" WHOM" Isis t tweet. re, !toss Vt...awa 1. Meet toRoe ..ftty r sks"Ist I• am sea ft. t14Na .r told t.ewta o aMaare Iw1M at hsr M love t. !sold!! ads too..w .pall rahetre.rti feefMltula egrw.w.ts. Ow4N•k" NII lia. blot to amot4lm a 0.11,01M pea04 far heap" tie". ' Nam taw Sualsair L we a. os aeeeerrc 2-Wolof M.ew.a prier atoaetrt tsar MVPSir al. twas t/sto is* a.ia W fKk.0 .11 a0we.r a ,sarad d rtyer o. 4-r-, riwetas a aMN f..tp1m4N e.elt rosier the ewebro lea! a4Yos .R p raeass so 9e lec taa as taw"" ylaso 7sop"'M r.a1.N k w pep C.twr. ! pose u ems, er sa er.wa inWas- WtWa oferwt a. 41oc. 1. Mat t1w. Me.. ter aeKer .f hsn a. mats 1. 0efaea fiaa Ifa'1.). aptictat oltl pwasoka he sr taaat ".the destt al i.aNMt. eMtaw.at 'aw a, M"pa>Mta ilia .ea• Iwam►ter aewe'%-o Plus;romill .tor aer the afIc". I/N4 she Mks M ""few be to - to atemmomaO. tlty. 4Aalf. fbu N to r14t.M aaltata oil aeca.4asy aaae.rto a" 4ltgte-"-.a7 -am Me obsolete" A. ftae/teaft mb. faleter10 seeks, w MM <aetroi Vatravl4ter i�r4eratlI -ft ,washes er Mosier ales.. twi.4l.t it* -4w-iw.1 limited N tooaNtwra ".egos "prat o. s1461 f. Slam" , peaKVir or"" eNprof 1* a coapa3a ofaewe. to taNrwtaf, aua lees.. the at"" Vista pemp[t71 ++.Sob at. ear ;. ! ,,... *away- at.- a" .airs ..a 'Natal by to. city. gooses. - so st444, to 094" to swore" tt.a.ygNllos Iq[at.drte $- soft wamoet7 eoklokiNly y Biggs}* Ft.". 1NINIM the ^ S ogre" -that poo"ttfN apt" afar.. to 1. ca".etos I4. sbts. it M"19wtofl prIota, deer",, tali Wolof 1. zz ". aale.N.mrma 171a1 4Wt Mal,* Awt aw N eta" M 0aKa1N 4041N40 sop aafadK N 1104-e11-Ny too - Mle""O of .01d into eKONswN7 IKNf"o alb "a assistant" or help of sieeMm Flats os .bow 1. NeKd . a 40te.0 U .a no brim" OetM JYMe7 a1� Q. pal so . ftos Mq a ta0N4tet y aaNR1� y Swp fttM 1ya. 1 777777777, . 11 Sib, ptbettt."f alto" .rats teml rota a a. s«e K - - - sow— K tale a.retavoo" areas .0 trig " tbe - - - is"raae of am abliaiq permits for twl+"" erase ar - - _ - pow"op b Nam i K ft—# l flair. "a apstara.t amen +leg t«rpt/w +re faler.to" rat" -."We 1. t" C..My, Im eme 1rwc .tail. e..Dar+ mom a.ent a . .. 600"e inlet. awivsto eurwtt" %be fr+9+••i . .. i►.b. a/rM me .ors at W 4" N "treats of IM so"$WMK a.Mr, W - M"/kesa M to arreR w t-Nfk "Ones elrtwrt" an M vm_ ilb. is as for Sam .00"Co tlaf ofbeluNw tfe* ttawN ales./" 101"0 peal"Ya lsogtoo ?Mr+ ty em z1ap+•d ;,ICOW aq al"q.ff aawtela MNrlbagr Nfwt«« aril slur. 1«terrtr - 1 .ill sitweee" ray "am W a" to"o. is". Oct" to abWN t" falwas i! f/frea"e trap TT«w. luc4 memo"" W "nlsat.e trains far NKtlw hail. beta rat« 1 ate 1. t" a" haste&" vaM" for atmor a plan. f fN1Nat twls foralwte a"!1«o err! o!N rNmfa a Ns�Y let at Aw uN tWfk a«iltN trlat to it* 1ffMa1 A fail N.e/tM• faM Or ONflfNt tM fitCMt of too "testsROfMT to "a f "MM 3mousYbtoe 318StrxaIol 3 9 its. pro. 4.Nakup gas Wiata" "lots far alus" plus, to its art its. t"r"aaNb lewiliN " alai. all). AM a" fit) to -1 We re to Saw wH6wov .Darr* xuet agates. ti swlel.ly a'. M.as9 la•ene tor aleaoe hap. M rs tot usursttM of ire otsst_ blitilWW HRruR.f ftM trot« an wtatW" } tag Nlwlf rovtatwat sit"ill Moro" 1M" "emitual rl as oEeab be 14ft-mad gra 57.ar • ro e. e rrrretN.. N ..a laws_ T-~" ftM+elw t« w off tqe. fell or CaKtret M "etM M too leMM Mft"lel Mo tg Cttl'o oavattr"t K tMlia alto. o"N/atw. aof awl tY "tote[" atrH" xawa .Terre U oaasat+ , le. bqw. feat or som w. na for...." "a IMAI. Mallet r�ler...rts rwn/f1« or AM. fi!), all) M a(tl N wtst.wa t I.. f!a!C .setts. "a"frib image ad "tat" awl" tic A.2. .ale t.f, y..a _ ru..wwwa. 1lrrrfl« eat... e11. as. art .4. 1. 6r01. • «ter" r4letau«t _Mill wall Dee br the Cn►'a •lawtalN M b_. Mow Atl;caer drug tfN 0i awes**. 100% at .ac4 w11w1. r .w «reewat .".14 . Aran Mew by Mae GM. Park rot.. fpslkale. we SINc tuffl. to too er11. ewwaK to a. Its. trios to **total" a c4ttificae* K occepeaar tw Nut it riK111o.aafti e�tlgsi lalrosaa.ots. %W taw .4 fr1.t .wire. Mar kse. old fm ran, We tM stuff. Htt+t«. at atfeaTsa vUu, food. bow. ewetrNi or tr"!" • lnew C.... ".real » .. iem.agl/n+u. WWI" are"~.1N-NI1Rt:1l, SAL to asalwt for W wren florid& ow&Nwt of fr~016 1 of credit to flwtme ol,actN" of Trr"Mcwturs 1'tlrr) 170. (eaetitat.► vrtes io xho brraws .1 s+q }rt a.tq parrot y"rara, suits for asi-011ortao antttaxw oltwtat« e/M Sot" to, in Saturn of ties —to or, a" 0, welfic"law . Ise NpAwO otwe °° f°°4ta'e Sa tAaro 3 at IDtaeaq" - !s wowuale M "saw U Sow lava._ teller aosst.eleR Mbw/t► Ss"ef3tN by no. 91 14a ..flaw/ tile!" coo"it In em. to as Nan tbet *"sterol.* at ter :Swtawa 419~10 or w) the ar 1pflit's ir"tn stof Mttficas, feeaf tM !'gCl .tact at its Awticwt. it" fNI"1AiT l"al otseonaua D/tr"rt" faM ST"w Aes lea brass.. vv - Antst d"i feel ar c+ewcett laD torawt .1 tea wilarp /tort (Se lr}In e• S Mflt .sort" pU.a trat[ie. totN}a to dear o Idemiflas "dill. Agar. j� ( [ aeof.tt iota Itkat le. ti t tst►ila ortar !tw"el" vaaa+9a Ma a« tuaa oarltied at21 ear ASf) b Attausurm S l" wttabt. lmtlxw"to no visa A"Ificdlo" - left vet" to December 1l. 1141. taw, Saw to dul.i" an Wo"ttar W-4 so r as TIM. MI" tmwtT +'ball. torts. 0 ; fwik..1 for $ 0.40 1 WON besteiMo pwai" tot ft«ar" via" "tsars it. Peen -ow, Wgttaaw /"Caemtq"), xb* cs eq or :tlra goTtaxrcl �a • - - - ilt/llafsl emits "IlNtad& wrap}!" law to. or bed atfatano Dull. Worse. AppilaNt tall lttvcl p.rat"t .* Swsi« aW f H.M / ".ad& .rem, afaf"rlata mwirefaat alretN. 1,11.1.6141 /lfa2 fiem.Ntl})/+Ig. abort" ataaua. tt . . 6~1. talflcsalet f i," 1 f LN" of M be guess+ l411081 We rem. b"N N " "artem/f tol~omm"t grow` 3 1 a.tte/r Mk.ws all isaltutlw ale an" 4wevrtwo tort!" Nld email "Miff lo"t"t 7. li coNltfN its, afar the erta. dale..... e to Sw low ad Meofttl dot". " tag d&"isr"t's tags aYte '"rme .1. this asses. toe Ml1 be saw• ale sasrea '.Ipg1i - .Y,.s.rr•1} iss rlbNw to she "!data hos"w ofis" sglac.owt. Mir mho, tA.N t.tw•. - - w'rla erele, Met Won We-ff "saki. 4. s nwir.t+ler•. OW to W Me ad& taws for W swor g s all —led am Spin_ 7rkr to - nowate M a owl" Suits for atk"rrf "INi plus 1. ar b DK~ samovar Is .wlktt. �� _ � r� ru� . . ,_ :. ., ,: �. .... .. .. .. ... : �. �. ... � �. :: ��� ti 2 yam. ,t. i;. � n � ., 1P • oft. bM M Muse{ to Col"ktle N ""Meer foe weM f w e et"i.r ... .. •}, AY to mow-ap A Mrmlt+eert r ao,— Mr flaff 11 ofnpm IF foe► P. /-f a on, aM" of Mel Note lilts I+i1NPMYM MpMfM hae. ter. er, poem..! F F-foe a new N INalf1M M too tans" I$M af•t1e only. Mr tot /•M Mpoan i. i "ou," pats, tY tle- 1w u ?onamteM 1'+, Pat. a fM( tF to roes/+• M mr rue N ,.ref $IKr1YNK offs " sea a"". if" 41 - a1 M to F"." an "I— an terra t- • Yelluoi on"& foe flaw I'+ ,n tM .loft► lift Ht- I" oorM +$$e rfi Altailire+ 7nwet xM q + or11"ReW, Ier+lrlr M me, Cope.. FNI or fY telkwm. ow nrtrirRf Mew Maae" M katk. a1ReNi- (Rota CI r 6) "a test.-1'e Runts WafkNf-t filpo 01 a of It aMmea by PM. IN aMlks"'$ Iee onto tell .. - � .. - lie arreeeai M fief', iw a. enoeoealm lY— lases+ test .._ t M tear Float to "tk {-Fttr N ee "ttee W-1 CMw i N •else. }Murat ftoekMi C-ta. tt f"t Sti" le to •Mtttal M - IN ells" 1 $I401 N PNaR Rtae gNnlor to tut t1I1 N tM tit} to too Ietm f Mel CMM II leriapp teal. at MKme flue teen / W I ~*oil. M CFtlfkM r 6.0-1 oil/ e. Iaal /r $full" flat pea I -t'l tell Mfw I~ k{nnla"s its No peMM, t}o. IC 4,04611. trot— flemet" $reeaia tea roc tore costa" In I9<Yt7oYo Its- N eo nseapao pf 1 wf Ytialna Jon+x • 'f • sr+< ent. •.,o.<atr e1f"se W +` far es.etee F+F In. of a pail. vow feet" gnn a Mo 1- tt- ropktw Flp to MI- to Meter U. 1"I toe, frioo to 41Ne1.141 ter f- trw000a tarty - {-lens xe Iaoer I at B,xrYa+ +! "e-M• }+. +NI. +".. Ft. "Mil+e+M M aMlal•i Ntow It. 11101. Ma Vier to 4"ltrkl of belief"units for IMII$Nf Mrelti f- M Rats Isom It. $tatt'MM, «{Ir IaMs. 7>r gplicMc YM61 3wd, oY or ylmalda y lotto+ t+..+" 11, Vecefro I.— tn_ It, trpn-ot, w+ce or •tafwa so.. plat Pee I, too. MII.aM AIM Wiliest It W FM Is no 'Alto oar I -No atee"I" Immo to. or Mee i-aowa of eraflt to,Isaa.oee tales se/ltGe/ ip rao1. a ... e i n•enpt, levee to. F W YrMe- H-, pFp,'V. M,r*+e+r• t oikrf fee Wee reKMM"e M tM M.MI.PM 11,10.11 Baal Mel rfine efffe"Isto "-nowt "Matloos 1P.$II.PM " .trot. reMlopeoet'e fade arp GMtYlttYi— to ite >9. Ial 0. u afp.ti-. ntt.or itaM r+rtrM " eMr, veep of - aerimM" Nal! MI INlu-M/. MMei M SRII. M.Stliltal: f,:. $If $Mt$ • M opitable totoorsomm spromm t YFf $Ails ielB-s{ N96MIII I+apia 8dvar Irldso aastx Men+ ,Mena -peso ar!awM•f W" dnlr-.+tra W.I. warn ayl+ 1I/. lY a polf< wt. fe-<ip 0.6no on Wt not rtoelitM Vka r ap roof Mte .smile +slat man atlaallr I--W !-- ad !were- N $.300.964 35/1a R. IMreo Itetntw ereltt ft".tre •P- W t+r+r tef ARM, to tw era"awt•o ti<ottF IV. ISSI Clot I". to s"tletor no, Ml/akr lFple r! KI-/tf Ya-. N the eeelQtews' !blr sure-Atrlo"s- lIs• lerantNe! In- N 'i!t 3— at >M at83A4r9 ppft rM, faFf rrtx+t nlr " me illaemft — Ilt— Mkp $lam- f/ro ffaa I. ton. M.MI.m PISS MilFl) M fM/ a Pa to too $owtoe H$ttitotor NheMtM amp $N(M. f— aw800tl rnNe - foarioo le Dteee l9 at IttcaY- - •p"ra'f"f'•. tlpil<s"'t 1.1, Ktn c"I'M IM to "A $peter MeeotLF Move" firs. to Amil—t Wall Pa1f, am' x X-NIs y Sal:ea •. 1 wets of " 11-1.9 n."ora f- r- -w ..tile Ffw any Star. tan" 60t1 coat It rteee' PSS will. III Aol1Fd, d teewt P— if.a1}.t100 4290 4t49ro5 :a PWI. yt xl.t - +o tpaepr }e. tux. Itw. FtF "rmetMer on rot/ale$ prrK1 to fte/1M ir.SSllClllli I.P, owleraoet'o Use A— G+atrlonti— I. tM :"a—.— r•r+•t tF MKapa Ple► "We rlr oM Monte N-fllwtor Ill -retell lele IgeeY 73otaa :oat Yact—sad /.Frier Irno ". « trM -•atere Mr.'F-+ e" $sr►-n+t of e}o.salts la n0M sal.-D III. r< :a afpct-. R.al,00 "Mlle• 1- 0 - 0 Moline .exM►epMx1 - Pits aNlslw/s. IMlme 84atnt-. ]a Ile afrt the We, one e~10" Wroses wfr tool ""Ito IOIMM - - - Worwalr elms. e$ plat 3- no 'Jartoom 3ewaitnlmr ,eyf W w+e. i11 Mw. M tM AtVttpatM•e mN, set" - sibuteoal t". St-r/ an "glad. III.M-Oia�pau+M'Y Iaax r+t..e1t tr " tta e■.+.t.e MNm"we, ett,*" t4 .Ww. i"ult, pllk"at- eWt-ot' !!e<w v117 3r �ee7Mtd asera@<asag. Iw Mau $ ts"e N a" NtKt1r tat N lees f-etep+/ isn. a"fVe a ! rent} Cr/eKt1- CWrat—ISA1.01-tW ►Ftk"atlr +lr .1 . . _ P}i. Moor toUst Sean-o a(o wMPP7cao ,t4 aaeafale7 ia1 us". at M <ttael "it to to tit/'l {Verit► haf"W" Mftcw. tea +ewe t "pie¢ ISW, Sa nee, be* Nit i wo, it -to% too MMttfte N wolr<e M. Ie ta—$#? • �_ e mu tomma oo a�erM a U. 9p�Mteam Dtotal8atea ES3nrcaYCM }Moe it, ...d on. v hattrnM Ofaitpra. tllMao, Lae I$iUcaet loll IN Sear sour 3 - I. W-" { oaKN /M t4 NtKlle Mtf N tYlt 41lteV-a O`aa FMao ./M a nownp, fl sicival" We teleran Piss r1 Mints fl far xatlM rtrrlrtlr toe Ie.w 8 event.a+ioeYa at too 'Pwets It N-rMat- tlPwatod $lap I}ws. that, loir on_ Mir M ae City'$ Wwtir fl -Wool M{k.. tw rill colpra NM -1at/MIMr Well be aeriltM taoaefla Pair tors K W Moat/t- N M/aol<a 1PSSr. W MOMtap ftAlleMp o"W etc. - oanee taMNl-ra 3s iMMelr 1I/. p i e .......... 04 &h. Como ftsaw its a* summomme ON a oaatutsaas09 -Cancy fear Rom I at ftes"M tam". as RAPPIAgeme wall fund the bNowsposemae to magalm Saslowma& We" tan NM mucla are *Copps" SO accommajugg IUMNOTM 71824 taw"@, Guagannams se five ICS94119 leer as JAMCSYMS @M&SWUd et alwalms Boularves Val to 3.3. Ind UZOOt- som so my of 190 IF ltmelas so 34W ows"Weed mecommeag ow smah Isve-umlawl and o"Itloo Illd a turd low mactaboved Ins atIstacd scay" on" S.S. aawa•sanes- is ""wood intesse talftoeraaeta 4bow1b" is cmatim 27b 4dwisto the aged for may of ampreggismotle) asia me be 17). tamo$ fuser to tam lowsware 09 saw 3W4111"20 parmic lot tomw We" or puss" in noon Al of 310cloome 72asa- tam 4A1Sfaet sh"s SWA. bond 4w Provide a lettow of crefte to on for ass Panama ad an smace so read"T bT Imr. Ike c3q7 affid It atafc. am" prodmossestiv surve Joseca"M Flaso t. fit 1;W i I pi 1A F79w- L . i ai .. - tM• p¢rf ftsw to no f•ataeeo of my MDfdm Permit tar .. .- ... - _ e•eleaar seem or Mrume to [Mee It of Mod s,no MRS. An tM event th" aomstrwtsao at an sewtw aaetrtotttar _ :' • _< ., uflwsotd a� s[et� seen aerOtdd. Me sea as • - "notation mace• saffuel eats. tr Das ae•mstlwa and aster _., .. aregtaa Reut4. IDaf ad �17ts a•a[[. fanfare veto w • _ wish qmprepriefa dto and dommomstatide a[3SAMMWa7 - - - - - .. reersatr•gas to tae aatfalmer" s of tad 1121 of Lane, Palmer tttrir ad 7tamma" ammuna". =011. Caaet7 sea [ " tort scat r uegeaal• Doeee !�".0 �9t0eso�mrse - 7 i tams. I b ¢lane Datuf� Sfpoe®eato , - . t and fA aseeal to olase csalMs,a Sa aiptrees It laroao o¢ aoeetea •ngstafo is tM efts, and osa•ty is sae a.a .tea . T A. !eM seers sraalWq tes Sompletsm of the 2owinto"m UotrtMtor uQbreat" suq • 7M data or dsrfatanm dolt alas 3aaled )c'otastleae stemtaste to • tad Ca". nw. Beaty am no at.ata aoetailasfe9 oatee Dam at , as we rya In fa�tearefaS afar aedetfl aM8 Y t 9e agel • _.; r.... .:. :.. •... :_ ,.c _ .: K jeettaao atoll M macaws raga u 9aet 'sea! 7u amtasdfy attee Mgfanfp of aawpases, ate .. t�tllu Mftiftad l's the C2117. NOWta•nay ar . '...`_ -:: •, . :.-.; : '. .,: . ,.-.;,.-..... - ' -. . •. • , _ - Owdl elf lase ' .- .. sane ass aroau Canmr 3a eel '� - .. �. _....:: - .- .. '"., Malas. y fL• [oar ewt*Arf0rttas 2e • nest a[ ,•.- :. .,. .'.. .. - acceptable omat te. ]moor taPleasatlee tM eestas aater,os►esaa ,scene s lim raft ar ?iteeo as a¢ tM [ say ar N >» f Immeopme Its". Amlicant aaalf astloste, ae a meter . _. esauale to tar city et aid COMMmacs Yepatanao 3•aro q %U Cs ad sad d ty or the ;sees, 7t7Qr �. . -. M tM taawro of • 10112111011 asaaDs for Issas ]] a¢ .. . Cse Amt aa�,cant taall aatale a ttamt ae F do MIL of am, Cats, and mtla Ca+r97 to 7+Oloeeat Me .. - :ass adstatea aa6+tdf• tatarls aryrareoeofs SRs, 'Sao Os, i 00 vmj•suar. C"408 as assre•ea, date and . - - aomitwato dell i» on" seats ad fafeesorataa ,au 4Nas.Law tar sefeagaeat sy�r«•l. i , a, ..._.. a.:- _ .-.. '-'- ,-.:,. ,:.: ._., ,.. :- .., .. - �:. ,.. >_, .. �.. .-.r., �..3.__�.ri.m��:,•..,Fi�ia3,v��i�3�s�.aa��GtiS�+e'4��e * )cm'w'ink'G.,�as9i¢Ali:+[%e�:�'w`�,�9',�"'���,iada,�_ _ ,-, ... :drive �. t,�,� .« —woo MI lNa•aa w aaa..w.t! ♦ i.a..11! w. wmat a•ta dpralasllo t►. aac•f*!+ twasl 14M1 w Lr11N rat slat M M Cate N tat" wets. arc oar a rM C.h. s al aA ti a. r1lw. ovra..r w Owr.rh awls .IMi. "WIT lot lose so tM •t1a 1. aaN of w ha'. too am owl a hoer a iNtaol m. warm rhos swlPw. a —$am 1•ra.sM aM Kara asaw.seat is oplelat et .r has se sate a ta.oss lo' e two, as. wr.a. h ..asga M a M.ar halo'• 0 f.ecacta aaoo ! loaaNs. fa lylas Own Mat 1" N/I a .wear I. ...I.M Pals". a, totes safes .tn ...* t vmv toter 00 • Osaa anrtla.. .la ..too tossclap fa acre w tar Yowl "P.— or rateaa/nr 0.e as Pop — Mwn. w'rw testes t. am 61 aso +ales". rMttw..lni. M rim M a. erfatla ac. of ao aotsaaalt a.lr, mutate, at a. ale/ Cafe 6oaptMhaf saw •[n ..o Chrt. toe too" CnMP Oore. ptraoa w 1nel.t M.allptiO' r•!h* Msaba flab). OW141•0 lost Ito alawras Omer tar sot oat hale "so lrle if" seta".. areal «Mat p. Mob 1. O.par roses alb h tae•M w eat awe, ass t.tl..o. /h toad loos, •aya. jfiattr• otwoo4f• a. IapsaM s/ !/pwi eM . t.MtluaeN AN i"/•noatllo I.b • is. talopa* eft misteeM •ad aaOsarrrat ac tetee"t/so Cosa s..I~ Iptkatla far ONeA as bola"/ uat) ad adMt tee o ftes"Idate Awlimstee for omlev+•t taplant !Cleo was. of W tall of w OMNI,. oat lay Is Mf till. ass w lay to ae aAott 116 aa►Iee at tee, ChM to the Casson. as am • as fo rts, aloltaad of Casualty afr•Iry WMI. ad -to 1M) aft r too t. W Gtf. W a e caor to tee naldo MgartwM at shtefa ala tt w Na1lPaat halt. I" CM was low ~" a Connotes fftalro vitals solrq 41*1 dap of tow efaallaa ►oilaas data of w Ow"I"S"t Wort prate" assists. tarp .. */ at. t1wifw. ! m".11 sraaattlo .a 000 Mfovso matal" set tat& A. tM Cast rleft .."too am woa•p* llaat.00 to asstal of the apt loot ors, to Iitaae at Us 0. !lass coast be lolailop to ley sit soma• the ewe a *Mutes teat r "Whoa to a fatal swot .1 la ~Mo am" or dyer apioolop- (the "steer&. arat9sOM parties of otat aa..t". am fryla/ a.Pa .t ile *lot .Its a .aiaal.tta rat1er4 Catat 1 coosatla at tee farillaa Octal. lee faurd lots oasat. Otfip 0,1141.0 tea prate aaa associate wMt. its $get"- ♦. daalao outs sal Mat "'pop teak (4) . pat' atsN+. eta'fyw "to aeflw "sign. "a Calf. suit to paps* as seii•ao. sea!' ass Ue wet a, that l011a1 lost. 'Mat' I.aMa/q t.a •. woes saw. alateld. .. tart.* latota.tlae M. sots w rap W rash, a.a loss' passe taw ant .1 too teem. OfopNe losstpcat to salsittai * toe "& lost pia to it. sna a was at aft gfot". this of Ms Moakaals 00o r. foes tM Massasoit at too W. aUteer I. a."— t. a tweet rat tan+ i parupM. her sts tlr Clot. p.a Cast ta'"U $*"Sam of WortmtiM .Cabe of *tbe-l". tee alp- Calt. aw"m to 7Ktls. Chisel Ntin. floral stsotaa ("01.. eat Copp ate too tat& .tit as tefi*c* ..to .aaMd sralff" ads aM pwwrat Mar 9a16/t 'aa tong lot► w tuff pap". eta aft lass. statist 'r roast .11% It* seal- rtns. of kat p. ft. aalee I•o.t .ill Mr. a •rep Mods[ log - ear aar 4~ nm twos) let& Mttaphr nos some I W 11 aM 4 *alto lo tie. .itb 'bp 106110101- octal to. arlosi al tee lope C sft ass opera. Its kassars. "slat aatpa. )self er aimlast ~. -let- t*lcatsmf toe we PW an aallllf. calm*. asd 'date ototlM tar data at tee to idism. Is. thole Ad da" .f tee attacks" date of this aptle�oat a. 1. tan pastel taw .f Comical— at. Ia th. said ts►ipa attar "a mat aaftsea. octal* Iee access paasee,"" ate treat a. aloo base as tee •taayn. Pta:a fatp•st.'a ate 1. 1" .1.1% to—. I..ase tee .rot* 'only a-�.• the ass aaadaw. vow.w %lei t is sMreWW'a Nt* eV ** 66 Ve C ,q M•apre w yttl. , ypglrfaW aw law"", to tetN• ante saawlg am:**� R4•s. M Nrida saws bete . N ON" to, a9gel's M Or YM• ow• ens/rww•t son aw N.t •evNalaa•a enlist' atneetn tern w a..Na.al Apra •a alesnoao to as O•r.tu. Calls - a" we M off* wwI•rlli N ate NssclNN soon N t*o pssevA o *@a'• vote* tort owl Nestles. N • •Mialet - a * comoss".•aees"as fs fw6a a w;ep to te*iatt •. p, tysvltolgptlr doe esoceff/+a so aN rlllopos es the •Its of ,V.wgg.t. r to oft 'wow wy.rsaao saatalson 1. to A•. al fen teens !M►lof Oft Aft Aft twwtlag tso aft tea-0-0 ter. r, • so~, rsspfrtotw of awotto d.. Ro••••t renew W oga• t r epawar•rd Mt t.is over. s tap..ft"SRk+• of . OWN?le@W t.atte or two. tester teen feea.forp; atapt• III /Ne. ow o.f.a tea we N a .0.; noattotrgowsw- a. .0w$ekw%p law lo"-M vow M twat pwatraoae. town Or ,,woo as Iva W-.40r nelaw.a an note Oroitao plem pa.a. +as M.04OW4 draw eon fpnw. t, ao abovwtt'1 or Apo appostoot•s eve Mai sagl'trMao'a aneMlnneo arts one noet9l4•e N uprwal saNatAn ow r.r �t ypape @•vile let tsl 000tolenM Mae& rs tenaatltad iw fun least lrNtoo *or oirow"r/ a/peral. as. tamcloscNlr N 4" ants+, at, n/plseel►sn fsf O.9w9rt1r Swoons ale toomwo asr a wtootwle, dstNaM doCKailoNten ants awls rllw to hen toow* + fates nq to w stew #Otte ate •net fit' *. den rwpteaffM ao n a.WV.. t9 0". aw legal qpw mwo . itrleoif9M Wear @Wwp of Moos sovsto men own seews•ep of "e or -OE srt srmtr. a Its• of e•d•esteaet gent, rote awe horse ert•i's.f.e- aver! t..sw w•etaeo r rasa We to W'N or arms. lops N ydeste. preat .eNd@et. pew pN•t" ft eve". lot. S.AMt A. WOO -wart to sons Strati fewt44 ilfgNaal ptlwlsg Nmttf. call. we shun slow -at of 9--olv.YiaMt M eats wafarrNr► ad one Ai1Mt•w data of ttf SMtp.sat Srdw• aav,a rtpre %a/ll lot a Marts. - a. a f."Ote •,$,~ to *a% eastlat la "table" •• �, 1•aNlll[Mien sae paKrIp11M of M/ [owns le loss Alw >• pwelntrrw. er 1• two rwee%o Aeon s cortalwd to the soar Or a the owl" for the rpwit" /nest ad for the aeni for• C. A wows ctsprins dobvdspna t tcata.t/ or W wlnell/ noltrtted for toe fear. �. frail/kNM I e..eN UOO trot% ad %all. Sagertwat laratdgei single !till lost•, took tort awe sou to a opts" eolaloy or developer. o. IdWifki4ko aq tome l lase •t tent OSKaood. -itaud or Saslow b an rrltsw adjacent to tea project cite slwce ten 3min ai fUder ass leaned. f. Ao nmsgmwt of the Anote at•s ens ten lain Isgs/ewat'l [agllaat:/ Nta its c*Wtlwa of sop So cpatatto to tar Of omloom trrr me ass cowtowAs Alto are ewtaieed to the Apfllcnlam for Mgteam Approval. p: Swifkailes of May wtsdad 01 tMllcatrM /r YalapOd syprrN orreowtts fora fieotswtlal dtrlattw dtlretwMlM tale vere nits Is sae reporting par sad to lot filed drrlag the seat yew. Y. de tltekMian or s c•wpr. If any. la Intel onaromW Wallkill" for or wtlM of the development Goose tswato N ti pewtws t •rdw. 1. a lilt of Significant tall, flood Its fadwal Woo" M/ch sone Awns rststsad or Mlcal fre ao•aal y steers. two so twat%. M.ett a~. as prpm of "tll. j. A Statement toot all pwwps saw Mee ill" colea of tat nda nt tort la es dwogwo altb nO- lisat WAR141 ass (1/1. roar we Std@W. A. t cot of or tKra s'oat its of the ~own of ate formaIapple ~ or nay tasad.al ambla[Miso tit .w r9cardd •f the onikoK prMat to S*WtlM W.K(i/ifdl, flair Strtrtn. 1. Goon d she Or the fotiwhp dpc~@116l of Sao asr lot* dlapnAS of all wwaan "at*. " ku~ Aftf coolint. • bil of gall" I've a as'll f •arwab g .estr tl*"OWetr Iafkntep Mepwat to a IacMsN surer.% rats focNttr. or a colftrgttaa of rKrlal of velMral from o recN14r• r onto �. a svOtaanf.t g*rrN era pereree are avow keel ew - So•r ervesa•r ./rat/M, ale stir /wetftM aafra•.a onto aewlpelllt aewN@• h ea.loansrwo eAt• gieStfi•M pad••NIa1 eNd formal. plriM lsetdN"• - o. lags of eoMettM took ca.iaM footlessly be waiiond a wt of tap lecst pNtllwp ale Igpctana Wersisfs. a oMr/led ttgwoot * as wall! of ant fOlrrO10 aoeifs of ISIS ~up or eons "wine COW140to atlt mat bgekpwat O'aor esoatl/aw p.tit 4 � . m am ad me, 000000 ao oftofwn rip ate MchrM. ` Rae •ypafean• ♦I fm"f -so $*ow4mo a. any ~ WagramtiM rmMlrai by as Mpsrterat Y Cosmology se Mir .tarMdA!Me ,tt✓itlf staiI ow*w Poe•oR• -i•di r Mesrwer via sictset ,Mp•stt to Wed !all. flrlr stNalo 01h IN I wI1 m waol?llea M sw op Zvi. Molt M ••fool rtpwt a el. hue, as city. aid tow {Otl1@ 1tM*tom •! c•r•tq •fldn .. *us ••mawsq o! too ottutim bee me tat ft"t@Pmw Orb", tau& aspen see{{ InsetsdO. st • Hwteara f. tdae"Itlewslw ass •nengiraiw of an case" to few plans of devolermost. as is too rprret$atlaaO e@ftUnwi Is the Apt, or is the 060,09 tot tales topftlq later ad let the eggs% long. C. a *Mowry Comparison at oovelepset activity Pa"-". sad sctwlly coodected tot tat roc. d• tMetifieatioe of undeveloped assets of load, otmwr two - iodl.id.al single family lots, that hevat btto let• to • ""Rate et.tity cc developer. e. td$tlticatioo sots Intended ata of lands /rfch•sM• - IwsoN ea ortioned all too developet sallafts" to the project Otte since the Development Order a" loomed. C. Y assessment of the Applicant'• end tfe tocat goverm• OW's Compliance vital one conditions of agtevel - - - eomtsusd am tat ors psaehirrott Order Wed that @writ• nseatm wages are contained in tie Amtlpate• one sevelopaest Approval. y. spectelwpr ctom of also meseesd Cal 011e•tIN tole - oswlagmmt swocal ON td*weto for a do"taealai dw1- sties dnsr@s"tios tit are tiled In the topsrtimg loow am to be tiled dattng the seat less• Y. bm indication et • cusngs. It my. to fowl goeota@aft - - jstledlctlw for ay pert/Olt me tans d•votgr$t tins$ loom@"* of the Oeuatlopw" order. 1. •tut of s/pllleae. level. .tarns teed tedw•{ pwMts - - sbleb hello Yeas sualasa ant "Was east pawl0l ti agemep. type me forest. permit odor. ad Petro" of sea. j. a state@$" feet sit foseMa hew beans soft owes of . too sheet forest If Cosesni•ace With s•@owti•nr {IN.N/941 a" list. //orlds prelates. Y. d A/ of air Is ores" tattoo of the NrOt/os ls1 tat • esneldpowt Order oar sal dwbaegne" aedtfienstions tuft a" - - - a" coma" by the appsicset vote"" to raYNtt/M fpp.pritdiidi. #&origin dtatwo. 1. owes of. tens of too fastening docaOOeaatlom of gprsr smut• d/apmat of d! besscdms asettt • Blessedness owe "mores%. d Nll of le•IM %►ens • fsedM fanetllseo +onto too"- _ peseta ledlcaelng eltlrOose to • licensed beanie" Wuto fscelity. of t• • eewlirmatlef of raeolg0 of &almost romp 1i roalslOt, •rats aaafs•pe opaselto. et Walter pot'facility. 'a `•t, ,C.,.: �, r r- aitted Milafdnso butt @taeaClnrflf • 0 1 &Hl of lrlq -a a "-an tonne! ~a ha•ale•fr ilMri.g engine • $al o recall" n&Wasm reeve 1ar1/it,. M a It rs./ereRMl. of .•Meta. r• aa•a••N f.O n 10101141r. n ./Fee "Mr -lop. M del• fe•el••fal laapae*e eater al.41,00" total l.,. Jliflf"nl f Or 01,000 •e -w•••M cerglia.CO .^lt all cl w+•:w.s a• •.e A•Meralrl.• heel a.l aMc••tt 4••M.+g Raraal..M ••M. M • .:•,.w. •sanl.ar . ef•MarMM Roil a eeltlw.e go on Mule or w df, romp ti $a HMO of eat law fo.elsoalt welt. So � R Am, for sovelee. soon Centel •owal••Ait as ewrltMM m @we or 410 trot WOO"ew f am Intention r•epaeaf. a "so am rtwo,ft error ear ipyitemt QReing aas•Isoals NM am% tlo.e+apcalrl ReR ealeetilm to ew, otwlamad a we of ty et.wl .pert .owilm K Cm,ot►Iw 11 nRel.. Jr. #NS, so oft into nor ft""me.l ftow OLW last Cutter, a tlaN laws vs" te: st'sloct realty, "Miele enonml 9 of re Polar• &Nal•• a eawlitq.f of tea Pw.fiewow MN wits We to be ace !r Sett pines r elf frtfremerged doga. It. Mean► on e. IMat•e//eil. *rr/as Not~. •levels left*." WOO, a"Ittgpf o 00 he a for else"" &Iola tarts oil I*.rw loss Ago $I"is admitted M Eatable a Pro mlNnseM. 91 tt un lath Co. Ibrey dMMeta Ito &ISMO" etryctor to moltw cwnm o mite all ,"When of toe eavlep/.s erdw. seatilia atrllttNy PICO yes Ur bolt dew M anisette, Of tM —1 ► Wt to M Int"glas by the yrlkalw by Cmallw It ar*$% 00 tlnw so BMI"m M WOW Crediting Prior to a MWAWddw tool a bog" permit or Crtlfitoa of QcOmil en listed Of tee City etbot to CWAItw Pp wela. N. Closer wterprel* tag e1K" M #Into Nut* t ad it ts"lls* (fly" 11. tuts tWllrs will as am by tee #sarlme strater In / ltorwg sMcsfh caadstws of tad %holm Kerr M let, .slNt to city arreett)mp for wwlfit ceMewats or pusisl OMMO, timer. aa1 dnistgm fro its tlrelw* atoll so be ""trod to of labtaolal dsfsatkn free W tarns at this •elsdom" order. Clo. intense W414/09 persits or corliflcstm so decanter. as tee cow ap so, omit Its easel rmets of COMitlem a, s ad a sae one at. No~* aH biwsq #votes Witt the traffic enalamis to CaMllsw 176 Is reared by Feet, to writing. Tor abume of tell oratal will trigger a enmttm of sdttmtl*s dcrlgw from too Is"% at p/a McNpMnt order. MSc. *was" to sactim 30.0911111#)1. floride ust.dne. ettuam sssmae ad Certificates of teremy for Pleaded #Into. will all Intrls rode UMq.welas /batlf Ma .. atsac"ra — we [MNt.R10 It .ww-ts e, densities 179. it. sweated the Heritage elevator to greatest Compliance with all emditlaan mg rose Onelepeat order. specalle amatn- toe pcocokceo ohelt lseldol a review sad evalaaram of the .meal repge to be sub - attend N the Applicant Poignant to Comdittne PI besot*$ and a review of de.elopm et Order cmditime and empltaan thegewlto prior to a reoamnwdatim that a satLise PM - sit of certificate of Occepaaey, be Isased of too City poessest to the enaltione of this Deamlapssat Order. J7. fwosrpotets the alsaayde plate f#eas t a" It tiesline driest* 11. which limits* will be so" by too Pla mtes olaetar to a ltoalng specific coaditlm*s of too eo"tep- mear• Order as Sony relate to City permitting for dp ille compensate of phaii"I prmloo. heeefet. that deviations gem the Sideline shall net be coo" M- to he abortionist devlatlose gem the tic" of tells osrelep at Ogdet. Rio. mitadisid lwllding permits me certificates ad Otevpsoey. ne the as" •n be, satil the seellirmmto of cosdltlno d Amid e hew sden set. Is. pttwld ion.maee of certificates at wmpaiasr gee elsaafee plane mtit all Material to" top--=sI* Idwilied Is Condition 171ot arm conteactid. C. withhold a certificate of Oecsposay Cog Oscar" glass rues St. dotll the torso at ComUcln MO hove elm satisfied Jib. tmmitems matebeld' sesaemme d a w bssldams Pala •. • >I #hem I nee elosgde plots Mul amosesme r*atsflee •�. rgatgmnto of C=MUm 171P. Ise Anne* at Toot appfevsl, sal anrptrnd Ding Calamities 17%. shall crsare a reasonable Iaeolibe" me add►tiams rational iwpalct alanetsp the dafelap3mt to Dial sablast to Jwtber denelagalaalt•og•tnalea*I-9eytet rorlew, a.f3matlt to SM.0641e1too. ll*ftd* ntatate* 1]AaS). Ise. 100botltatel fvrswnt 10 3790 ee435)12)13). 71oraeia DtKwtaa 81mi. wltlamld lsomame at may 31111414a.t sarsw.a as ""ace 1 of 966cal" tsar4 ast11 all interim zoace topeW m to 148023180d IS Attoshs t 3 arm capaafuctfd 32 repaired ors Co dines 17a. nil 1eNetatatsl miudlold loaemes of may InSsIdJse t/ta !at Pins t so steeoveo fleala.SCSI me Appi ales. lemma. 210nd. sal ytwidse a Jett" of credit let 3117,E 11305 1-113221 prsment is Crudities 37f. no. jose"ltatol use —it tome=* of Amy lut)etias Termite lot no" 13 of eloeovm lima lord thmjApplicant in". bemb.af pfmm" a Sett•[ rig great Ter ".227.aso 1199% dollar*) pw omot to C:anottes Vs. - 4- ::.... .. ^ a . . .. ,t'...- ♦: :� {§1. .1 ..5 •+1 j. _ .. .,.... r-,. .. ;., .,.. �.,, -. c:n .. .-, .::. ... ..n ,, 14q .�. ./ .J �.. .G ♦�°�� :�„.{ a .L � .... 4... � t4 'n"�U5 ._r .. i �a.T_ ^:..:. .� :.:... .. .; . •:,.. ._. ...:^ :_.,..:. .. ..-_. ':-.. ,.., .: ,. ..-.... _ ... .�,... �`'t..:est{F��t�tl�.•wiit:����'Jc.f�`.�.�'!F`.k��iY.�r...Fl%:.-:..1''•,S'�Ce. ,r��..._., .. �.. •. �.�. ri..°.w ... +,r....,..•4...a.�z. i �" "�I . ,......77 -. .- M. MNtem of Certificate of eccopencr for O#Kgr alas lam 1, of . )!h. )leestabal It aaeetrete/w hes set soealwM w ter �;• - : Iw11 . bus sot loco MINd for too 1-f1 Mhw llKrteM1" pit111d edeoer *odic/ d. 1! • M peeaala ha• fiat bemf •aMttM 4..ea. fdetrtb~ lsdeseet" sari ffstw. etthrid lltwemf/ W )nam eel/fltalfms PWIOM a faadatla Old If e,ter pries to "Comber Is. 1//1. alghald losses" of M/ lend- t•ara•t• W air e•retfjsaw so aeb'1NMa7 for she 31 at aynt ' N tar from" laoun aw/arhml tMllldrfly &Itfr #" Off"" 11 or I" prmlc* tot etecalf" Pugs too" It emit tonppitt:ast a 3,. eia a wee ! pm[t1es KA'metal AePtac.ne n,, tl tie emotions 'e IrmtftIllpre /1. P. h. Me. 1Nawm err prteHtaa of tcct•fK1 ror OIKf)Y PIYI Ptoro t M flied errshases tees. a4ergrlatf /pstmtafnit •Mstaf. tstsstled the roo4comeas od 'CaaLltlw 17b. hr1111e1 frrN{t for ftlape t of folog. for the We rate fair dare ef $sit.@" to roof pres"t coComfltles aid' - M. (Oer) llehhsld lsaaenes at afty leAldseq great ¢a for an Steel "trait Is.wenlett. rmtrod y Cowl%," Ile caw set toes _ I of asepo flame anua no .1Mtlaaea asssafaw Ter.. dhersllwi � CertWlceb ef lcc.•Yq dl/ as Ilaad per OlKafaf f1Ym m. it • Siff aaetet flYxln/ /estsls lea see baaa at•IpM flow f. wkr6 ter focal street M0r1 a 6 omit %go cow/el". as N OPfaseff St. 10111. ettel6eld iflwee st ear wlidtse tga/edeafto of Cofftbe 371. city a" eat wraatn as caolatl" N tMst %wo'.Wees. permits for lUearas Hasa case, is rill taw antics" few a. .r a feb*K %attar rlaaat:../ oetbw an see noel salittm Peter, W. if a "tent axle► ftesoct" Societe an eY Jose coe fitted rle► go !rest -•sots. allleb 9" Ingle" orrsfelse laasf to. of essd as). lame/ wiu"td lawsats of atr7 3e1341a1g, yeralta for 3fu se .e tla8 - 11. am. slltlalfe Isaelt•e of mpg wiletai 1ere.0e tic~)1, N/1, dilaslt InsasKa of per tdlidlee Pardlio per OtKapa O.rtaAf.. Some. eeltaerbtd govermentgafalesr /s.la7,Ml it of stace am 71"s Until the 1pp13caat "tlatlaa tea tar 000terev mile ataaa to ss•11 sae yip%heat atat•em$. film Plate Photo f will ter M11Cwt itemryY . ISIP.M to flit pa to to rwr tmeaet to Coodlttem 170. ed CaNltto 17j. am*ilvmeatKs sr we tert.als orrempt" top-9 sr. of two draheaae tr". CMlef" IPI. ' ew.serlah opow sse' ardaclae. fill.se N for? rrrllwt so no. if a War Smtr flowing PKIga ass set time commit" b - f. DltMeld ionswe of a C•etlfleste at fteaea;'7 for Ols"rm 7111. fowl It eeeeaestles bra set Iran *UM&eted a* tan gr.f/e1Un sae. 31. 1"1, ellelrm Instance of sly solve" pere,ts for tell plate Pb"e It atlt eeeettattio hw eaeroseed a tl.o.. DwAgtmo Distr6bftfe omom"•tN 300 Tyst®.. W1s116010 and ... or •Peek eertsr rt.ara lets set bor. ersttet" by on Mo haslddal /aterrm for 7iaes 32 ire alaeayaa lesser Uesil xn. llnreJ•' )l. 1111, el/Mata Irlt.l•er N mry M11al.r PPrdItP vet @$KOM PIYe /bee 1 trail the ApolKeN fatft ta.fte.ml to VW even esodtles a! • aaatteat tot she settee%ties mil the Musa.% aetlNlw tar re'elaaeamta at ta.dlteaa 1714 . yet otm-pe of*"tteaet of a"I. t.n teelleaa. am t sit-e.eer. Pa►r10 to eaatitto 17/. ""two Dlfteabftee straleated Ise Spool. .alto cap Irtltme e•rplSa/ %awe K. Mom "PC"*" from. ftf. D1tf m hftms ef or trlmin/ Wells for of Ilk"" PIYa fasar ! 2f1. peal slltton%d led■I Me eta ¢set,tlaats of tccus.sm7 tx aer•e•rrese pworaswtt apretme. fs.st►.dlle Or RN aerate.► of of pin WOJW Until "WeKtlst /ds consisted so if.*.. qmf "• etlerl•tf that ter fettostey eletlws eseoltsstN b/ the N06C lhaao Is of abralm 71aaa metal Construction t• :va•latod of a aNastt fer cagtrocitan all las %WASe elst►ftww le ter/f lresre aid eeddeaaedetlma• dated lsbfmarf 1. /fit.Coalitio iews" eefa :. at.ra. leervee of a.r asrtl/les•te ofap.Pstr Mr she laaspRlae elfanmrd slp etas ) ehiw air bm SNOW"" at ter anllosst's es11 *cafes. •lit M a s Sumitomo, Distributor .31Nrcatse 3MP 'fyatw- ef/fmfaa view anal! It prtiw of file pvw otll twstrKtlw ft, spear• studio feet let[ Project pelt be twjacl to as Igglet far erlttres a•t!es a its Ptaes1 Oltoetae, mhatl •at M mre• M ass, terms) ulthbsid aso"Wo err a cartalltate of xuapancy fur am sommoree at II.e.. Ara atse.•tw of e mix.++aft qr wtfaow AolkrN to tY DD/Qartetalblstrll ores. if mom orfseps •ldpN to be M tPem"M elf tote rtptoposat footsore "hew 1 of a,rea7s• visa* at saa•[aaK¢les sea _now csd •n et" also NI tie emton 0lantww M/weva M "It". is Meat lr ton Cott Watt• / pin of /ter effective dsle so Nis Oseottftlma of so, to aes.•e• sp"d toot of stow we vs trtaleess Disarloot•r 311eteated 1aq 9yetas .caw • lagtmmaa grew. to m te be Pam a cost of is""" at Yr Jetlelap to aes of all elNamen lest ameat r•sidestiat will. p@e anticast best art stuatlef toe eaBnleamfta at tsaaitl - "raft.- "rt. Prftmef. Ir/etar, abt foods. (fat set berm vd/vttff y Ytefmttw •f traester of festatfans. "slab *home esd 171. tstwotii" of all bwk~ el'«r Nett to off-wtfoe create solegt cahsteas •ell eshar retail roes YtaeI the psdlma or t•.mfe awes camwem of ter Swirl rem. meteor pwltrd last ell Wool et times t mho t) prooldef that total recall epee• dose Is ltt•ceffet ), parsers/ft a3, line ) - after 'Uaretntsd' . _ wall M aide If the finds. (M Net too") tMorod or confides" ft Nit ape •atssts ))O.MO squill test. me Sfeat%& iPsssldsa. a•rwer. 1ha[ seta a,gesl loco lie does sot $M%M* & W. CMIdiMif emeed tom awes toot mmN If IS@ er lowtltetto of eraI alterastlp• pas of. of evdiftefetw vsssaefa tar Messed oterli"tim ad the 39&usgd Dell allies Pas stoma floor!" 1e eas toKt time mrdlassce. es, the laatttow Otserlwtee BlbrdtM lace lifetime eto- ttsJ)dlal p"llal less" MJI, ail arch sl}ntlaatlan log, Tire . Pert)! MresN h fDOt. lasesefe floss, east emit be convalesced with the ai.wrllastaa* - likes es dove"" to the taottff apselfloo le f"i- for the wired fall f!e/es AldtflMl• t;. ties It. - Amor refection IN Use. 00"t of bees, ogsate tore es Oro a sweep at roils to stator of bath of /hsam I so '4 re s Pf•se IS of Olaeermo !lase. :. Ally hle ot la Des, asefst • df at ifoho slsst rest •Mats wrest me males egos /oases I is totems, It dthaet air *"fall Irm"fc lsdrdao to sere. • ,. ....:, .,, v.._-•... JB " fir' h�� �` •t ti �I i t _, ,�...;:o?e4t;:!63d.`::�wr�s'iu&>���'[vc�'�'a'��i,s'F� A i�'° r r„ � ... , -, , . ..- . i ., ,. . �a�f. 'fib .--. i .. . bl ,�• zy.. :.-•• ,. _...;. .. ev'Yr $guess" oat Mor a t-vw a«ree commwtmo dttt W effecOew - ", @fw of shot bweaatl INr. re relkstiw t« mewl" W faatwraly 11. It lilecar a Glace MM t I@ tut sNw onottwtlon slula I . so. to the seM1► Lee of adgaw al. sttasee ties +»* a , _ cats of had Meat f1w (1p•Ill sill le see'sGt•1 leers gem tot ""sense date ef tow eo•slepmm Order. taglie to 000. - .. ..._...; _ . ....... ... .. ..:`;_ .... ...- :.... <. _. 4416"Wotlwly •tA A form omit" "a awe allowee of rM€cN elel emiterq tag effsetlaoeomo •! tots dewloPsoa _ _. eta on" of bsslopew (sows I«t ortal or lotsatety (/kw tree o". /� asob Gress• ar desatapase , persles owoeades Goal& WO or Gl spade tow •faeity iftow, M 66111" tells ar MAfrf oa pooted. eetil OWN it" N as armed application fee ,. .. �. ..::.. - . t.. .-.. -.,... .... -.. ... Gwtatl O Me&e so elta brttsotee t►aert to" r"im. meeew. eaaolapeot€e atsererd. peerldlee "Wted lefefeeelso. to z ship ttsrs • Ip@Iq ides ttOstaMla/ etapn ages Gc:rrraa to astsoalleN totag pepC. eltl. aN state aN a "be" dMltim ~90" W ppGMaprt MMnt or test W t•a1MR+1 Orb oual"Most Urdet tots". "now too ft"'"Na OtdeG- . .. is ON" w o"erttolly Insecurity lefreotlom PosNw es W #attempt stop" rwoo et to tole oe"lt/a. as an ats"" afpltoe'• _' - - - is W autM fallcottw for haltpow arwst. or goes a coop is tits sae Mwle/Itse Oidee Ie goes GGsetteN q oGsele pot- . t`e`. . - tloorl; o"10gw w M Meratia/ w W omit bole, sdMy-« s/IN ele.a a cow loaf otter seen a " to IspsN. tote .. . r - witwo. aG city Ail @tsreatsf tb forte. farm pal#• no W peeeGeptst ONat emit iswee a" assail &&means$ % M • city as eawwfto aegis IOUss ropristlese make M Mt faetrka am. a► footage fee" At effect. . k - - MOM Omit# or klmity and OW eodtown attaa4161 is W omoc - toot .<< < eels, sooty ad tolfay +ite sV offset soon p. 1l. best MIf€Asto tits too a11Mo6 Ytloae cons -bed M W 1Msh €a - plans p"1au1 Plans" coatis N Ibb apart ad iscwomemsiae- .' - sew• foretry G, tow. b b aa•fr[!w M W GeeilcoM•G ,tow as - - rktw aMko a tow flan" eNect« etle as so". •w will at be atdfar" to be etMteatlat 4fidlm from W tarot of shle 6slpashl- - *fort #, IIse loWtttesaa of tO N 1M.Op •ewe tat of offse or am for an wtedae ashw of rawswlll ate spa am proM M 14 Intel city Conslntfs. or- .:. aflacftlw r tr NFIF N MetrraMi. awlM chat caarate a€se rotell den torwitea to the Yt ate" tow pfaite or tows of fsYa sow 1 swift@ all etas ceemw spew co"Iftiwlf 6s got outgo - - - WINDS Nona ate. or s Gotta. /4 r b1Miw of. • to tit. is) Wrest ot W Van now - - arts M Goatw string I or 1. p►wiMp the tow croilMM tstots' M • .. ... - - ... _;�;._. �' ':. - GafItNM ate at!lttGa• coafantf w W eraafttn N tea•Itlw 1. ` - - - -.. M eta of to to tom (N1 pettwe of 44 stet tow rem of @law _ `. IteeM i or1. rvolew on sets ?"helot we pow mode ant" . 1 I% ewe fo Cautitiom 1. lsoltkatlw M tow 41 as aMr/kyl1M r. a1 tea Mi•:Mte ' - ii dwokialwt e@'W #W irt•r•wa ba€ttaw plalrl"Its, QI€rtitw . t No Snow. a •e!'it aloes" h tot. £VOW, Ala *',w O&OK t N W eftrlwaM[uNe to Committee, la. w... 1 -. -.. ".... •.:^ 'YY'�'�� '?f . ��; .fit ,.. _,. ... .- ..., Ifi16't.e'�n •�_. a:?_a -..... ". ::., _ .._..:�,;-. . , ..;: .,•. ... .. _. _ .. ,.. ... ._. ., .. - r e r , �.:.�. '. . _.::... 5-.a::.,:.. .<>, ....,.� _-.�..._.,„,..., r. ,•-ti�. .�_.k , <, -. .. r, 4,,.-: �d� _,,,.,€ ,. ..: !,.•. ( ,>.,.> .E:.a-. ,<.. ,�, _, r: >; t.: :,r ;,..� _c , x_'} � r .T� . 5't l y I 9 7777777-7 � �--,� s — �••• ••�-•�� •�•�• wrn.�... try Mf NNctM Mtr N AMf l.rLht�et liar. itMtl7tIML' t4 - .eerr MIL "M to M LM.r. mt. t. wooly 06" t.M 10. ItIt/.IL M tfr r/wre:. N • It..Letl.. MiMq ter.0 M trfltlM N re A.rMLL .f atn pe..rt, Ci/b. A Mre. 1r. LL 4rrsrr - r.etb.ctt0 Ltir♦.! of of tL.rLyt4. t.Mto •Nfattw rltN is Ookma '. re•n.trrr.r #rLrr ttrr... tr M1.MR ►.re► r..L. * is ... Ar .. ... ... n trty.tt•L (t(} N» Nip Itw.xf N Oft brwMNMI arltr M tLL ... ewN.,wltN .r t..t4 NtM. i wrr tr.L rr NMMis.I. N w #.el City litgN.. 1. ea. M wW M r:..lrwa ..r.Ie. Mer.lrfer y...r.11rrro *RW- MMa "* Mar b Pago te.rrl.. tMll 1. pfebL. Aii WIL it" to f. Maw! ON. tIMINy .IaL4a - ... ' a eLe. UnLrIt.L. *LI.hP rrorrr+e trW r L. ..r.+*r.. b I wl ... tN.rmit". 1f l"tw I. Mf (.Ntll. cost. A WOO A M Mr.Or tir.I.10 ii *A*. OW /./t tpNyL.M *ow rye. dtr rr law. . A Hf tMr. taf ItlllltllrN rrL „f.fy wo €trt/elN. /M w./tuMr trrr 11e.1L. Ar.N the IrwM.ewt •M M Ifewr - •. .. y- .:- ^, ', r.MM M p1f h0011110 Mi M 40060 yrtNtll4. !M UeL4atllt -... .-•. -.. ,: -,. .. a.r.rrr.. .eNw rrq...- ..� ftp1rN M LNLi. tr'r.111M if ed a1dHd NpN A !1r N/R two .. - - am M t wwL ms 6.fllp" •ter - l.IAlf -r - "all Mlr. W - fifll thmodul Laf. M to tarp M N/Kt. 1N0I4 •r• N IIIIL'- ::'. ..,. - . :.... . . M4rr.t •Lr ge1/.Mi to rLl rdtL tb I.rt. .,. ..:. f LP � 1 yy. Irwrt CL. Lrilwr(a* ..rr c.Laetlsr Iaa pp:1r^ } to is aMe tIML"001.4t OrMr M.1L % Milli" S. a+{ "? A. _ q.r tir .i...r N sm~i .! rIw► C..u. W.Ll.D.....6.11. 1` €# - �.►tOIM 1r er1. a.v/I.q.s" ar9Lr i.af..ar tsr c'a:3q.3iAes a! "h ,xa c: 0...1aa.Ma rartNr "Cd x" 44. IL'yW. .r aU ftd. I ... _ ....�. -n. . ! �� - `. u...a w t•! ta/•• aaaCMa aM w ..• w tar •aa•+.�s ,� :. .. bIN•s aua aaaa� !. noa• O�wsapaama stiatir don lama. •.aaas > ax n•sasaa s, am am aaQ me �• alas aQ UND gnaw at aaa•a l Gnaw tsaassat. tsauv at Ur aer a• m�ltag. 3aa8ell•g Js1a � ljMUA to WA rises to Jlea as xuewmn a 3RUWAa't , all Lpwmaaa• 7as'aa•t as aaaa La•aas Jact•aa•s ;�#Sgi 3®! A - w asasiesa• sop" a tar a• ash :isa � . tsa•tErat� s•A aarsassa• at w arise 2"Ody. 321010 AAWMWs. te•ratf sMoat Cara aatf/aa saa/meaar •t•toa•a Tystom at J. A•Maa as t•s8•als® 9teers�a as 00 VA at ta• JaaaIar� . ..... . -: .: .-..... ., ., :. '. .. �. _ _ _, r. .. ,. _ - � - a ■ 'liwi�e �Gt i9sAA 'i40/R. �A to .^��tr - - � . � isr . a. iY..es...a ato...Aas rs Am 7M 1A � � i il4 ASA.rIr 9� ^.•'' t)st•�t z,a 13a i1rL lG7 � �..: / ineA• Ar ^r mar a.w.e �wrR �lnaae Ant Ion Istsmitg .. .. s•sasi-57 � !er e� .mt link cam— s, /itatrMY J ad J ar.a» s.. yie.laAaaA� - .r - boas saissaad b JNavq 2WUW. !M• M aiYAa sf ta• o»w• :. M 1NW t•atst �a1M y .. ... _ -.. ::' - ... .. ... .. ... ) ,...i. 1. . .. .� '•.• �..: '� �✓ 'i :_ vc.. ... : .. .. ..,,�...:�.:.. :.,. .. .,.... ... -. ., ... ........ .:.. .. ... i.....: _r - .. _�. � . ., .7A >.r. t$ir_`,r�> ....... �.� :..:: ,... .. •. , ,.:. ,: ..:, .. ,_:. ,..:_ ....:. .. .......�.-s':a d�`'1w-Tf>4Kn�`:�4.ittiil��i}aLl'i"'.��iYr �R.��' �>'ih.,H.i .:.,A. c.�.4a�i.`�.yvs''t'i.��ytxi�'�}w%�t_ >-..��.��. .._,...w,u....1.'� r ,pl t..'A`.. ..s.-: 1I. +wwsw w>Ikw1 A.MfA�• twn :w �wwnw dN � y. � - � � �- - o. fww Ott oft* v" * wl+wtt owl 1111111Nfwt ' ! wtw AM wf WS wtsetwwww•t. i - ! We wwww N oft ".Nwlw.. r; at w wtwtwwwt fowl Moe t10Nwetww N► Do.wtwwwlw+t 1IM/f" 1AMf 10 . - .'• .. ttlMrwtwN wt - ... wb 1t1w to wwwtw•ww &ajwwt to awittwww, was",:, "a gowithmt for to wwwtl. Nwsttoq *N fwwclw Nt 0001 AM WN to we 4"00w5 pluN, it sow. wwwt E'. wtwriw wow at we t@twtw ti twwt•w w ww•wtwlw - It go. w. ftwwtwt wf Owe wtw wfwe11r7.y of {w www.wwwlws Mwtww► - - - - - er ww*wwt f! w111prt • - .'. .....: ': :. - ..", ,.;" . . .. -:. •,..' w '�11 ww•w+wlww•• r.•wwN•wt1, +•.wr aww eft% w .. _..... .._. ..:.. - - - tplw•s•el. of tww lJttl•M N • wwwwtww owe owe >, ww•wtwwwwt. 0140 t!t Iww110 b w w++wt -w l4.ttw•.100,0rt to *wwwts•a+t Ntw "a fsswl •w .. - p•w1*wwwal0 ertwSAlwtlo www fM Offwtl IwMf L , w�tw�Owwl•w ptwTt am - - .. _ w ttt0 wt■wtww+sftt oft as wwwMwhw+- - - nwwww/pNww wM tww CMWIl Ott is 00- 1 1 4 _ _ lywetewu fl�.409etf, ftwrpw fewwwfwa .., : .. i Ilia 11w•wt�lwwww► sow•:ItlotitMll �'w+rNfww for oft � eww®tl $a wwlww M w ONOW" *A �p of we Ir iRwdM++� iwwfwNtM*w "a CIIV wades to 0M #'Iw?'wew WI" wwwww wwl?IMIM tuNwtww ,., , - 1 i t _ Fl- - wlftl !'AR t�ItwwlR of AwwwNwoo wow". . w. iit�Iw Uttc7f/itNw N fIMP vqwlr f*w11lts !p'!!N• 1 n fw JtWool. "a Mwtfwffwwfww wwNNwttat etM.w.s # • 1w � i �'.a 7wi11 "*Moe,, ow"41P IL k.ewwerwwN twy1 tww � • � � ' � � �, r - ww*Ntw 11041110r- g S � v li y�.._._.. - :.. a. .. ^l. " Imo. •:.r p.. .;/• ..� } :- �. -"� - pp. .I � :. 1,. .- .._.. .. -. ... ..,: ,. , ,, .; ............. .. o.s ". .... .r. ..-. .1.grf'. ...., .-. .. , .' ., ,. ..- .... .,. -.. T -•. .. ,. .,14.. .. .. .v'-.. .. j'. ..-. .. '�.�_,�t .. .. +Y ai!., .% .•t _ M Y:" Y .I _ .., .. _. ..?.e, . ,. r., .r •. :...,,. .-.,.. ..}^, 'C.�k r. -. r .„. -ft Moottsrta tow www"t ttr sr.r•ttort Me - a' - t•wrw.ttM MryM M - is a a we •t•*ill GOP ►.. - - - rrHtt - I='. -. Mwttt n r if "Ov MISNOW, t■r ffR tt0•N MiM M so 4W em MMM• Im"it, w #am at. to ' all as Mrw MR""" is we ,_ ',:. .. UiN tM�r•t• M et•dtPtur 4t•rat• it AS rtatttup arr - - . .�It•ra'sa rill" •rats "'trust" OF Qlr ~ a" ter • . ,. �, - ' Otntttt. Cth. Ups opt tt!►. »t :rtttuttt ! I Mtt/w tt. t•wtrwrtt• "a Ckwstt as hutimetwo a "tt tits tt•t t*t .. ;. :. _ -.. . _ .. ,.: - ,-: ,•• _ - ` ` fltstareart wrOP. WS'lttt. t.1 1 sm r w• m"lle tat ttib t• tb Crwutt "1 40000 - P trl tw em awl M tMM7wi t► at •te "arts e*t tarty• d -Wem* &Mw Oww" r Ines trrtttrt. sw�tttwt _ - ftrtttt tM rt�t OntM t ari/ttttt� of "a tw?ttw- • ftrwrr itta Nutt write am owes. all MMiMM r,ttrl. th P wall 6 arts f 0". F -" tMn'r•t M ttrt tuwt "a rust of ...-. es, .tt etror*e to soft" f. M tt gars iri.�7, •.0.A.. Mrrt t t. rtt fln ;;, > tt. �"` Mutterer rr+nMMtttt Alrl� eM w.rret wrattrnst. ttct.ittf ell Mrrtr► aMrF*raat*te tt seen sm"WO tttr Mt. tows MMt. SI M i - • 'nttt.attawa. as!'M'r W hl ew Me tit ~4111- r',;. - a w Neeto M "a pommel,. 1•9t00tr7 Uts"G". e�t•e.rnn•t r Hiy 7r. rttN cap"s* 01, w*+rth tttrreere a w wt brttfwie� tow. ' �I �P' 35m ?��a�-YN.�4'( �.,) !G...... ate".,- .�.-Z,M1, ai.� �.�?Y.��.-._ ..b. 7Frv,_..tw.�•a�T.��13...��i�8��-i _,Srt��. �dGW.s, b'E. �1 �F:4i".'�:-�...rtR:rt���3xiF}.'U.�P- ....�.✓��-`..vin�b�.. h�'�.'k t.. _. b,�1^.6t _:i:.. ..., ♦Y..rAs 77, A CITI OF MIAMI. FLORIDA �l 1 ; INTSM.OFFIC11 M`MORANDUM April 29 1986 Sergio Rodriguez DATE 01«: TO Director of Planning Department Z-I-86-2 suuccT: Re; Interpretation on approvals required for Miami Center I' FROM Joseph A. -Genuardi ( Biscayne Plaza) Zoning Administrator project prior to Building & Zoning Department CNcLosuOVIs: issuance of a building permit In. accordance with your request of April 289 1986 for an interpretation of requirements for the Miami Center I, Biscayne Plaza Project following is my interpretation. Prior to approval for issuance of a building permit for the project the following are required. 1. Amendments to the Development Order (Res 79-396 and 80-707) ` is required because it has been determined that the project as presented at this time is a substantial deviation of the existing Development Order. 2. A Major Use Permit would not be required at this time because the project, as a whole, was approved under the comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 6871 and went through the procedure as a Development of Regional Impact. Although the present Zoning Ordinance No. 9500 under Section 3405.2 states that when there is a substantial deviation to.the Development Order the project must be processed in accordance with the terms of Ordinance 9500, Section 2801 requires a Major Use Permit only prior to commencing construction. The Miami Center I project was permitted and was being built in what constituted phases with the office tower garage being built first and continuing into the podium, to the hotel tower and than a permit was issued for the foundation for the condominium portion. Therefor, since the project was commenced it is my interpretation that a Major Use Permit is not required. Scheduling of conceptual review by the Planning Advisory Board and the Commission hearing on the amendment to the Original Development Order would provide the additional 3. review necessary, due to the changes to the final phase of the projects A variance will be required if the required number of truck loading spaces are not provided. 3 r ;7 Page:-2 Sergio Rodriguez April 29, 1986 4. A Special Exception for On -Site Parking will not be required because this has previously been approved and there is no increase in the number of parking spaces to be provided. 5 A modi;ication of the City of Miami Waterfront Charter < Amendment will not be required as this was provided in the existing Development Order. F= 6`. A -Class C permit is required according to the Schedule of District RegulationSrPage 5 of 6 under Principle Uses and Structures. 7 I do not think that a Metro Dade County Shoreline Development Committee review is required because this is a project which was approved prior to the enactment of the Shoreline =T Review Ordinance. However, they may wish to make that determination. JAG/le cc: Walter G..Pierce Aurelio Perez -Lug onea f G. Miriam Maer - Zvi Joel Maxwell 1 - 1 Q`44 �v rr '.71 dLIAY :ttr `'i75. The appropriate application and fees to commence public hearings for the Miami Center I/Biscayne Plaza project have been under discussion by this Department and the applicant - Miami Center Joint Venture - since February S, 1986. The applicant has requested a definitive statement by letter of April 25, 1986 (attached). Although this Department has maintained a: position,the Law Department .has advised that interpretations of Zoning. Ordinance•95M should only be mode by the Zoning -Administrator. Therefore, per Section 22009 Zoning Ordinance 9500, it is requested that you render an interpretation on the following question: Which, if any, of the -following approvals is the Miami Center Joint _= Venture required to receive from the City for Miami Center I/Biscayne Plaza as conditions precedent to applying for a building permit: Amendments to Development Order (Resolution 79-396 and 80-707) -Major Use Special Permit , -Variance for Truck Loading Bays ' Special Exception for On -site Parking -Modification of City of Miami Waterfront Charter Amendment Recommendation of the Metro Dade County Shoreline, Development: Review, Committee. Your prompt response would be appreciated so that processing of the application.', can commence. SR/JWM/rj Attachment cc: Walter L. Pierce, Assistant City Manager Ethan P. Minsky, Shea and Gould Aurelio Perez-Lugones, Director, Planning and Zoning Boards Advinistrdtian h S �.r .5. _ ♦ �ii _ ....-4aaoaY�fY I����Yn� —_ f� N 3 fr 1--4 N lS �d M RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AMENDING A DEVELOPMENT ORDER f � (RESOLUTION 79-396; MAY 24, 1979, AS AMENDED) FOR THE MIAMI CENTER I PROJECT, A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT, PROPOSED BY MIAMI CENTER JOINT VENTURE, AND LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 100 CR®PIN PLAZA AND APPROXIMATELY 201--399 S. BISCAYNE BOULEVARD BEING TRACT D, DU PONT PLAZA (50-11); INCORPORATING THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL; MAKING FINDINGS, APPROVING SAID PROJECT SUBJECT TO THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER PERTAINING TO THE ENTIRE SIT&; FURTHER, ADDING CONDITIONS PERTAINING ONLY TO THE SOUTHERN 3.01 ACRES OF THE SUBJECT SITE KNOWN AS BISCAYNE PLAZA PHASES 1 AND 2 AND APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE SUBJECT PROJECT KNOWN AS BISCAYNE PLAZA PHASES 1 AND 2; FURTHER, DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO SEND COPIES OF THE HEREIN RESOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT ORDER TO AFFECTED AGENCIES AND THE DEVELOPER. WHEREAS, Holywell Corporation proposed the undertaking of the Miami Center I Project ( "Miami Center I"), a Development of Regional Impact ("DRI") as defined by Chapter 22F-2, Rules of the State of Florida Department of Administration, to be located in the central business district of the City of Miami on Tract D, Block 1, Du Pont Plaza (P. B. 50-11) , a tract of land containing approximately 8.46 acres located on the North bank at the mouth of the Miami River, and to consist of 928,200 square feet of gross office space; 630 hotel units in a structure containing 550#000 square feet of gross hotel space; 500 dwelling units in two towers containing 865,700 square feet of gross residential space; 75,000 square feet of gross space for retail use; and 2,565 parking spaces; and WHEREAS, Holywell Corporation submitted a complete Application for Development Approval ("ADA") for DRI review to the South Florida Regional Planning Council ("SFRPC") pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes, and did receive a favorable recommendation therefrom for a proposed Development Order Qn May 7, 1979, as set forth in the Report and Recommendations of the SFRPC; and WHEREAS, the ADA referred to an office building with 928,200 squar+��feet oaf gross office space; a hr�tei structure with 50,400 gross square feet, two condominium towers with 865,700 gross square feet and a parking structure containing 2,560 parking spaces; and WHEREAS, Holywell Corporation complied with all of the requirements set forth in City of Miami Ordinance No. 8290; and WHEREAS, the City of Miami Commission considered the Report and Recommendations of the SFRPC dated May 7, 1979 and each element required to be considered by Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, Miami Center I complied with the City of Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood. Plan, was consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complied with local land development regulations, being then the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 6871; and WHEREAS, Miami Center I did not unreasonably interfere with achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami; and WHEREAS, Miami Center I was consistent with the ADA and the f, Report and Recommendations of the SFRPC and was consistent with the cons'd ti d b f i era ons an o jectives set orth in Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the City of Miami Planning Advisory Board, at a duly convened public hearing held on May 16, 1979, considered Miami Center I and adopted Resolution No. PAB-23-79 by a 7 to 0 - vote (1 member absent), recommending approval of a Development Order for Miami Center I; and WHEREAS, the City of Miami Zoning Board, at a duly convened public hearing held on May 21, 1979, granted the Applicant for the Miami Center I Development Order a variance from the 300 foot height limit and granted Conditional Use approval for park:-9 uses as allowed in Ordinance No. 6871, the then Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance for the City of Miami; and J SAT - WHEREAS, the City of Miami Commission determined that all legal requirements for the issuance of a Development order ter Miami Center I had been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City of Miami Commission deemed it advisable and in the hest interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami to issue A Development Order for Miami Center I; and WHEREAS, the City of Miami Commission, by Resolution No. 79-396, did, on May 24, 1979, issue a Development Order for Miami Center I with modifications, limiting the project to 805,400 square feet of gross office space; 630 hotel units in a structure containing 658,400 square feet of gross hotel space; 500 dwelling units; 85,000 square feet of gross retail use and 2,365 parking spaces; and WHEREAS, on May, 1979, the City of Miami Commission reviewed certain proposed changes to the ADA that were different from that approved by the SFRPC on May 7, 1979 and found no substantial deviations therefrom, pursuant to Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes. WHEREAS, the City of Miami Commission, by Resolution No. 80-707, on September 25, 1980, did amend the Development Order (Resolution No. 79-396) by amending paragraph 7 thereof to provide that the Applicant reach agreement on interim traffic improvements prior. to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy rather than prior to issuance of a building permit and further finding that this amendment did not constitute a substantial deviation from the terms of the Development Order (Resolution No. 79-396); and WHEREAS, the development of the northern portion of the site ("Miami Center Existing") has been completed and a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued therefor, subject to a restrictive covenant addressing remaining conditions • in the Development Order; and WHEREAS, Miami, Center Joint Venture, successors in interest to Holywell Corporation as to the southern portion of Trait---D, proposed an amendment to the Development Order to change the development allowed can the property yawned by it, such being the southern 3.01 acres of the site; and WHEREAS, the City of Miami Planning Advisory Hoard, in a duly convened public hearing held on February 6, 1985, did, by a 6 to 0 vote, recommend a finding that such proposed amendment did constitute a substantial deviation pursuant to Chapter 350.06, Florida Statutes, and recommended that such proposed amendment be referred to the SFRPC for DRI review; and WHEREAS, Mr. Frank Callahan, Chairman, SFRPC, sent a letter dated February 21, 1985, to the Honorable Maurice Ferre, then Mayor of the City of Miami, stating that the proposed amendment constituted a substantial deviation pursuant to Chapter 380.06(17); that the Council would appeal any decision of the f City of Miami Commission to the contrary, and urged the applicant to submit an amended Application for Development Approval ("AADA") to the Council and City; and WHEREAS, on March 28, 1985 in a public hearing before the City of Miami Commission, the applicant withdrew its request for } s a proposed amendment; and ' WHEREAS, Miami Center Joint Venture submitted an AADA for the entire 8.46 acre site of Miami Center I on July 11, 1985, to the SFRPC pursuant to Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes, requesting DRI review and approval for an amendment to the Miami Center I = Development Order (Resolution No. 79-396, as amended by Resolution No. 80-707) (hereinafter, collectively, the y "Development Order") pertaining to the southern 3.01 acres of the 4 site, deleting the previously approved two towers containing 500 dwelling units with 865,700 square feet of gross residential 5 space and 1,215 parking spaces and substituting the following �x therefor: two mixed use towers to be built on a ten story building base all. to consist of 150 dwelling units of 300,000 t gross square feet, 220,000 gross square feet of commercial use; 1•� - 4 - 1,480,000 gross square feet of office use and retaining 1,200 parking spaces altogether comprising approximately 2,600AW 0 gross square feet; and WHEREAS, the SFRPC, in a duly convened public hearing held on.Februnry 3, 1986, unanimously recommended approval, subject to conditions, of the proposed amendment to the Development Order, all as set forth in the Report and Recommendations of the SFRPC dated February 4, 1986, attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, Miami Center Joint Venture has complied with all the requirements set forth in Ordinance 9500, as amended, of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami as such applies to the proposed amendment for the southern 3.01 acres of the site; and WHEREAS, the City of Miami Commission has considered the Report and Recommendations of the SFRPC dated February 4, 1986 and each element required to be considered by Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment to the Development Order complies with the City of Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, is consistent with the orderly development of the City of Miami, complied, as to the northerly 5.45 acres of the site known as Miami Center i existing, with local land development regulations and complies, as tp the southerly 3.01 acres of the site known as Biscayne Plaza Phases 1 and 2, with local land development regulations; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment to the Development Order does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment to the Development Order is consistent with the ReLiort and Recommendations of the SFRPC (February 4, 1986) and is consistent with the considerations and objectives set forth in Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes; and Y I WHEREAS, the City of Miami Zoning Board, at a duly convened public" hearing held on dune 2, 1906, adopted Resolution + ZB -06 by an 8 to 0 vote (8 members present) granting a, variance from Section: 2023, Zoning Ordinance 9500, to provide 3 of 10 required off-street loading stalls 12' x 35' x 15' (all in Phase 1) and 4 of 8 required off-street loading stalls 12' x 55' x 15' (3 in Phase 1); and WHEREAS, the City of Miami Planning Advisory Hoard, at a duly convened public hearing held on dune 4, 1986, adopted Resolution PAB -86 by a to vote ( member absent recommending of the amended Development Order for the Miami Center I; and WHEREAS, the City of Miami Commission has determined that all legal requirements for the issuance of an amended Development Order have been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City of Miami Commission deems it advisable and in the best interests of the general welfare of the City of Miami to approve an amended Development Order for Miami Center I as hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, HE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: FINDINGS OF FACT Section 1. The following findings of fact are made with respect . to the proposed amendment to the Development Order ("Proposed Amendment"); a. The Commission determines that the Proposed Amendment is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. s: b. The Commission determines that the Proposed Amendment is in accord with the zoning district classifications of Zoning Ordinance 9500. 4 "' c. The Commission finds that the Proposed Amendment would 10 e 1. Up to 2,500 permanent new jobs would be generated by the Biscayne Plaza project (the subject of --the Proposed Amendment), and, as a result, nearly : 2,900 additional full-time jabs could be created in South Florida, with a $108 million increase in a total wages and $184 million in value added to the regional economy. 2. A net positive fiscal impact of $8.1 million would Y.. be created -by the Proposed Amendment. ' 3. A reduction in the growth of regional energy consumption would result from the energy efficient conservation measures proposed by the Applicant in the Proposed Amendment. d. The Commission finds that the Proposed Amendment would have a number of adverse impacts which result from the normal course of development or can be potentially `x mitigated by the Applicant through the conditions in A the Proposed Amendment, as follows: Increase annual energy use with the region by the A z{i x equivalent of nearly 6.7 million gallons of fuel l� oil • S 2.. t=Increase the amount and number of hazardous wastes ;r 9* :generated on -site. } s ..-,3, Place additional unfunded demands upon police,: s: -emergency rescue, and fire services. + s 2 i Generate between 720 and 1,410 AM and between 675 k }` i Y and 1199 P.M. peak -hour vehicle trips on, the regional roadway network and, along with other d development traffic, reduce levels of service on segments of the regional roadway network. Section 2. An amended Development Order, amending Resolutions No. 79-396 (May 24, 1979) and 80-709 (September 25F 1980), being the Development Order for Miami Center 1, proposed by Ethan P. Minsky, as agent for Miami Center Joint Venture, for _ _ OF ,•44,'�t.J 771 z _ t 'ii +,...v---a',i* �wt'c-i.7^�� 3�• 3 y. t i t j _ .�f Tract D, DU PANT PLAZA (SO -II) P.R.D.C. is hereby approved, with modifications, and granted and issued in two parts: Exhibit --`A" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution, pertaining to the entire 8.46 acres Of MiAMi Center I, and Exhibit "D", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution, pertaining only to the southerly 3.01 acres of they site, known as the Biscayne Plaza Project, Phases 1 and 2. To the extent that there are any obligations, rights, duties, privileges or liabilities set forth in Exhibit A which are in conflict with, or which are substantially similar to, obligations, rights, duties, privileges or liabilities set forth in Exhibit B, then, as to the southern 3.01 acres, Exhibit B shall control and supersede Exhibit A provided, however, that nothing in Exhibit B shall be construed to in any way control or supersede the provisions of Exhibit A as the latter apply to the northern 5.45 acres. Section 3. The Report and Recommendations of the SFRPC dated February 4, 1986 (Exhibit "C") is made a part of this Development Order provided, however, that nothing set forth in Exhibit "C" shall be binding in any way upon the Owner of "Miami Center Existing" [the northern, developed portion of Miami Center I consisting of the Hotel Intercontinental (f/k/a the Pavillon Hotel), the Edward Ball Office Building and garage and associated uses), its successors and/or assigns. The Report and Recommendations of the SFRPC dated May 7, 1979, on file with the City Clerk as Exhibit "B" to Resolution No. 79-396 (May 24, 1979) remains in effect only as not superseded by or in conflict with the aforementioned Exhibit "C." Section 4. The Consolidated Application for Development Approval ("CADA") as revised pursuant to Condition 20 of Exhibit "B," attached hereto, is incorporated herein by reference and is on file with the City Clerk and is relied upon by the parties in discharging their statutory duties under Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes and local ordinance provided, however, that nothing set forth in the CADA shall be binding in any way upon the owner of - "Miami Center Existing" (the northern, developed portion of the Nis Miami Center l project consisting of the Hotel Intercontinental (f/k/a•-the Pavi.11on Hotel) , the Edward Ball Off ice Building --and garage and associated uses), its successors and/or assigns, excerpt to the extents that such may have been a part of the ADA as filed prior to July 11, 1985. The ADA, Filed in 1979, as revised pursuant to Condition 16 of Exhibit "A", on file with the City Clerk with Resolution 79-396, May 24, 1979 remains in effect only as not superceded by, or in conflict with, the CADA. Substantial compliance with the representations contained in all Applications for Development Approval are a condition for approval unless waived or modified by agreement among the Council, City and Applicant, its successors and/or assigns, jointly and severally.: Section S. Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" shall be binding upon the Applicant Miami Center Joint Venture and its successors in interest as provided herein. Exhibit "A" shall be binding upon the owner of Miami Center Existing and its successors and assigns.. Section 6. The Development Order attached to the Resolution shall expire on December 31, 1994 or upon certification by the Planning Director to the City Commission that all conditions of the Development Order have been met, whichever is earliest. Section 7. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to send certified copies of the Resolutions immediately to: The Florida Department of Community Affairs, 2571 Executive Center Circle East, Tallahassee, Florida 32301; The SFRPC, 3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 140, Hollywood, Florida 33021; Ethan P. Minsky, Esq., Shea and Gould, 801 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1401, Miami, Florida 33131 and Jeffrey Bercow, P.A., Steel Elector & Davis, 4000 Southeast Financial Center, Miami, Florida 33131- 2398. Section 8. Tte recitals of fact referred to zn the "WHEREAS" clause are true and correct and made a part hereof. �r� � !°� :;§.. .{.. k'5 �:., �' �? r wF-. � - 3 _ �5.�, ;:. }-13#'�`y 4A,_'i �.iL �i. q 3F 'u {,`I.y�•"`4kr �'k• fa. ._ a' R 1 ' Miami Center 1 project consisting of the Rotel, Intercontinental. (f/k/a the Pavil,lon Hotel),, the Edward BA-1,1. Office Building and garage and associated uses), its successors and/gar assigns, except to the extent that such may have been a part of the ADA sa filed prior to July 11, 1985. The ADA, filed in 1979, as revised pursuant to Condition 16 of Exhibit "A", on file with the city Clerk with Resolution 79-396, May 24, 1979 remains in effect only Y as not superseded by, or in conflict with, the CADA. Substantial compliance with the representations contained in all Applications for Development Approval are a condition for approval unless waived or modified by agreement among the Council, City and Applicant, its successors and/or assigns, jointly and severally. Section 5. Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" shall be binding upon the Applicant Miami Center Joint Venture and its successors in. interest as provided herein. Exhibit "A" shall be binding upon the owner of Miami Center Existing and its successors and assigns. 4 Section 6. The Development Order attached to the Resolution shall expire on December 31, 1994 or upon certification by the } : Planning Director to the City Commission that all conditions .of the Development Order have been met, whichever is later. s, Section 7. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed. x to send certified copies of the Resolutions immediately to: The r Florida Department of Community Affairs, 2571 Executive Center Circle East, Tallahassee, Florida 32301; The SFRPC, 3440 a Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 140, Hollywood, Florida 33021; Ethan P. Minsky, Esq., Shea and Gould, 801 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1401, Miami, Florida 33131 and Jeffrey Bercow, P.A., Steel Hector & Davis, 4000 Southeast Financial Center, Miami, Florida 33131- y ~ 2398 . a= Section 8. The recitals of fact referred. to. 'in. the s� "WHEREAS" clause are true and correct and made a part hereof., 5 s - �NAII 4G.fii F k'?Nl'k4Jim U E>¢IIBIT A A-1 RLSOL.TIom 110.E 7 0 7 A ALSOLL'TION Of TNT CITY OF WA'tl CO-~33SWS Aitii'DING PARAGRAPH 7. EZ*132T "A". 1gE30LUTIOA :!-3>f6: MAT Ss, l9T9. BEING A 1DtVZ' OP'.!Z:%7 OPMR. APPROVING RITR a00iFIW,1ON3 . THE BALL POY:�T {IaIMM1 CEti7I::} PR:.ECT: THICK AilY:Ra`1t.:T RZQCIRES AGPr6Z. V:-1 On IKMIM TRAFFIC INPROVEM-E71:3 PRIOR TO WE I3SOA.yG'= Of A CEATIFICATE OF 0CCL7ANCY RATRER THAN PRIOR TO THE 23SU10CS Of A BUILDING PSAaIT: rint eG TNAT "IS A+lLti'D►1�C? DOES NOT C0KSTIT UTt A $13STAMIAL DEVIATION no-* VIE TZR"3 OF T IM Dtt'ELOP!M!%T O:asA. AND iL'ATNtR DIRECTING THY CITY CUM TO SVO 7XIS RI30LUTIO:: TO ATFZ=ZD AGEKCIlS A!►'1+ THE Dt�E`4Pst, WKERUS. the City of Miami Comissiot by lesolution 79-396. dated :gar Zd. 3/T9 issued a Development Order, ap;r.v- ia5 Vitb acidifications, lase 'all Point Dro1oet- • Detelo;ae»: of ft*1io3a2 IMaet to be located on Tract D- DuPont P:aza and SRSREAS. paragraph T. Zxhibit "A",, of the Develermea: _ Order requires the developer. Noly t31 Corpora -ties. to' submit doeustestatioo concersiag the design and ocb*dule for the Az .e•. sentaties of Interim trsff#c tWrenre21eats acceptable to the City of Miami prior to the Issuance at a. building permit- we. rNZVA5. the Projected construction sctedules for the Dill Foist project. saw hump as Miami Center. and the aftacrs: loan clock "cat Plaza area pose iatevore Vast and operating toss;mists is the tateris Period, end a VaPont Plata Task Yorce represeatiag all of feasft private sat public a erseies. sae appointed-Sept"or, i. AW by *be Traasperte.soo Plas slot Conseil Of the votre lit4s nine"tt twous"ttowt to oxpePditiewsly r°etosmead a schedule of iwplPawaW1 ties for laterisa aad final traffic teprovermosts to pabl#a A"0010' w cm: owl— r n A-2 and private entities, and, xiiMAS. the Coerassion finds that it is in the pub:se Interest to Continue to assure overall pub2ie and Fr:vate coordinatipn and participation in interim and finrl tra!lac solutions in the DuPont Plaza area by providing that NeIrse:.l Corporation reach agreenwnt on interim traMe Improvements - Prior to the issu"ce CS a certificate of occupancy rather J than a building permit; POW. TRES'.iiOAt, BE IT RESOLM BY THE CO.21233:O:: OF THr y CITY Of MIAMI . YLORIDA : Section 1. Paragraph 9, =abibit "A", Reso2ution �Y FA 79-3/6; May 24. 1970. being a Development Order. aFproving with nowleations. the sell Point Y r f (Miami Center) project is hereby amended in the following particulars. " Traffic Access and Parking • T. Prior to the Issuance of a belidkagyere6s, Wt fieate of occupancy. for parking and enclosed areas. (permits for such natters as foundation. seawall renovatica and site prop- aration will be Issued, bo ever, upon prop*. applications therefor. before such approval` Is required), the Applicant aball. using = aasumptions. and geseratios rates scewpo.ablo • to the bade County Departseot of Traffic and Transportation ("CO80") and to South ilorida ` "giosal Plasslog Couscil ("Co Cil"), Proper* VRords and/or tigures stricken shall be deleted. Und*raeorsp reris sad/or tigures oonstitute the amead+aent pro"sod, The pasataiag PtOvIsioas are mow Ilk affect and rer►ala wrc*gtap#d. wM _ 1 p� 4 } �i' ' A-3 and submit appropriate data and docunentat.ct Wirmatively demonstrating to the sa:is:ac. %ion of the City of Hiar!s Public Forks art Planning Departments ("City") and the Ccun%y acceptable interim improvements to allow road- ways to operate at levels of service accepiat:e to the City and the County in the A.M. and P.M. peak -hours pending the completion of furl traffic laprovements. The data and docuinea:a- ' tion shall also include projections acceptable . to the City. the Council and the County establisi- x. tag when implementation of interim solutions sha:: be required In whole or is part. tuch projections shsii be reviewed manually after beginning of occupancy and. when appropriate. modified by the City. the Council and the County. The Applicant sba11 pay its equitable share of the cost of I=;"&e- seating the acceptable interim improvesn+ents. Prier to the Issuance of a bending-peTeee certificate o oeeg anevv for parking and enclosed areas (per=ts for such matters as foundation. seawall reaoVaaoa and sits preparation pill be issued. however. upon proper applicatioss therefor before such appreva: Is required), the Applicant sha11 *sties%* is a maser anteptable to the City or the County, such equitable share and bond that aBount eVith the `CZ, ty or the County. Prior to the issuante of a bOJ4#iag 'enahm Sertlficate of occgeaneX for phrk$$X .&Ad :ea- . i siosed areas '(permits for such matters as founds:fo-s• i Y x { 47 A J W T i7k " r ' •. A-S: SCE =2:9. tatitRe 11ssm tom: as+rtuant v G�aster �60.0 riasida tsstu �f sca Wo es of r..mi r1/sida leas gmsidered in solte MasiAs Asid e.: Play the tanlanee ®: ve"Went order fat e611 saint. • Devei • . elRent •. Ati::aa: •.. • y be located in the Cit7 •-�e:. � . of R;au. saeseans is C`.s7te: IO:.Oi Tisttda itattitss 4449 'Otter due ESAsiders..Sa �y of L.t /iasaa • •fir _ ._ �r �• w.s asspesed do lyaent - wish setu2as4er+/I Lie !1e os:- Ises:s+eRdasaas of the 7 a:. suL�s tlsstda Ds7isn'O1 si.nntn� Camrsi1. Me :Mk t'e fa11s in7 attisnt �i:val Ef this davels�rtRt Kth TAs dr sNi fttatiena. .. : . i. :llf dcwisgrent is slotted ` toA atEjett sontiining at sere tlsaat dSs./:..� pwsa Efts s: tress off its • 'Oeer d10 he exits IN a structure, can. tatniR! ilO.a00 atuare feet of gross Assei stater - Soo 0"11An Osseo* sgrere fact •f s Units: gross Man we awed =.lie isrR;a,; sFatea. �' s�i�t as 'rs7ssed w►!ld ""Piss an aysrsfe View Asaa Ratio of 16.36 SAs t.'Oi acre site. .fsr os1�'eval wvius been pre+rirwrl granted toe a •ata'OIlea Ors. slut 10-►7set lasi7l+t 2bl.it snd a�dttiwlai aArsrewal for s+•r�iR� eases. 1h0rs:�er, the iK easetaN le Me,rrgMae usa::e ®1 she sntissed Pedestrian spats � it wn floor.• tewi sa ` � ssetified h► tila rV�siitart i./l the Aslieat tea fee � t *proves alwd UA era i+ l'isltwaaY design daeu�a� epf Ilatth 23 s b bySWW&GptJIt datedIL M Iw w w 1 t4 j w.h 7a' .ih L ;_ "i.°'✓ S Mkt .'�,+. ..:..t ,,, .. ,.....v-v t .. , ,. ._ vz. 5.1•v.iii' .. 1 - A-7 _ Nsaiss foz such Matters of fsxo+dation$. @*@wall renovation s-tC s::e v1a be Issued. however@ upon proper splieetsons thore:ar . ►efer� apreral Is requtirsd. -t d. the applicant•sholl provide landscape trestsoent for the easter:y and e; lapin Plata as ®s+eais of connecting Lte Ilayfront walla viw1 a@y.r t park. at less: eerparNrla to the ttaansiea►s of the Sayfront Ma:k.w1:•'t unsiatsranes by eta Applicant. nmal lantseape plans are subject to eta aprot►al of the lSa.•+-91rg Aspartissnt aM parks 8apastsest. !. innlnject to obtaining all accessory parrits and aprevals, in the event that a pw+t::avn people lbvar station is treated at. Or to tee raesnay *:.. . lissayu iau'overt between it bad andM Avanres, then the Applies pravi6a sr spar level pedestriaan sarnnestiaa to tine stetieA:. - 4. an Me *vent What Lte developer is successful In segu:ring o.nersup of a: 3085t 'area of the four bleeks In adjacent Doent Plata. `ten the egg:in:art obal: sansider'.ts provision of an sppsr level pedestrian sa:a:ertisa fret W48 project to tee Applicant's future developstent In Dupont glass. Via!?te access apt Pa k rto 9. Prior to the issuance of a bonding poroite far reruns and anclosed areas. - darmu for Suet matters v fodndsttom. iparall senovettann and site prepsra`, w will be issued. bW*ver* upon p1lrr applications therefor. before suet a"to As reguirNl, the Applicant shall# using assumpiona., and gaaer@tisn rotes at able Is the Mde CW% my Pspss�04*s Of 'fratfie and Traftpsrtat wen t*C.eanUOI a Moth rlarlda Regional Plaaet,ie+g Catsnell t" t°oun il•l. prepare and sukss: 8"". • Prieto data aa►ddocumentation affiaoattvely dareonstratiatl to tint+ satisfrst.aft. of the Utty of SUmA Public warts sad planning 16par to t" pity"t Slit ><.* Co a y asceptable lanterlsn iuprOMMINta to allot ssatirays ta, p*rate at laves of sat"" acceptable to the City and the t`stsnty to to h.o. end PA. pRak bb: MNIM the aompletioa of tisal traffic tapcove"ats.it C1 d ` Yt A{E i`-'ui:i inl;, :-'bi',�y.s_`'�°• 3t.�-.'��'n 1�c�3''�+�''� -�ru., r _ A-$ l . ; 'data and dacWontatian Shall also tnalvde projeettons aerepsaa:e to the City. the council and the County establishing vhon trpltllen. - tataan Of lntesis oolutisns shall be required In whole or in pact. Such projtctions shall be reviewed annua:ly after begin" o: • Oarapone'/ and. who" appropriate, modified by th* C::y. tAo CsWrr:: and the comsy. The Applicant shall pay its ogUi%&bls slaw o: tti seat Of irr1e44*11a"g No aes*ptab3e interim isprsweasats. Prior to : the isananc* Of a building persit for parkins and *"closed areas ` fpornits for sualt s►attars as foundation# soavall renoVaUe" and , site preparation will bo issued, however. spa proper ap .11co inns thosetor be:are ouc% approval is remised). the Applicant shall' sadists In a wrr.or acceptable to the City or y, nli { :rr 1 - -1' 00� 4•? •39 ♦ r+t A.1b r . U. The Applicant will provide at least the equivalent of the spaces t.-ts: would be re;aired by the Dade County Boning Cede C50VUSn 33•l:4 Zw 1. ft r •. eselueive use by Cendsltiaiss residents and quests. The Applacwt. may ptwiis such parking $"ply through sanstructien of adsdtioaa: se::•pa;-:a; CACAUtles s Mro"h facility redesigns tasrough design for and provtsis-s of Vale. perking. or a ovabinstLen of the above motheds. ;> tnvfro++rrnts2 . 32. The Amucant will men to tau South tlarida lhgaonal plaaa:ng tas+e:: t!u !'esults of its asarine eses;vnizy survey before proseed:ng an stars:: raftova::-: U 2! visb2e wine essanuaities are detected. the Apgliran: will ircar's;sts, r: s an its Cer's of Lng:neers permit eppasatieT. Nunes to "-isdse ispas: of s, z , Nsra/l rensvatia+ o�+ Otse organises. 33. the Applicant will Inform the Dade County •isteric surval, of Lie izavp:ie- and tisssng of escavoti n for the project. cs td. I" Applicant shell secura a ear92es seWn parent prior to Lae incepuen of a�anats+scrtsa. , ls. 'Asia Development Order dull be sell esd 'mid If subsu"U*a: derv.&F ►o"t of t" site has eat betas withia two years of the "Corded late of the Cavrelopr- Order. M TM MOXIraest will Iessrpersts ail addities►si Itsiomation requested by t•hss i.. ' Oavelopmeat Order and revialma subesitted by taW Applicant egbsi;vent is Willmal sub salmm of t" Application ter Development Approval Irate 3 oar - Plate document and will prewidt sopieo Ie a timaly senmsr to the �ui� •:era '' lrgLqusl plarwieg Ceuecll. City of WOMA* made County and the •tote. { Aln iJ SF[. � sF.pi i xii ` s �3� rg4},r. "...ass .sk�.�.,�{._r�—r.�•..:�r� �....��. ...�.�P'a� 1 � t: gyp,• v Nu. �r'.+;�'h�����' � i; A-11 , 37. !M Sppliestisn for Oovelopwent Approval is incorporated !+•se.in by reference and ralisd "on by %M parties in discharging thtir esss::nr, duties under Chapter 300 rlarids Statutes. Subs:sj,%tial •ossgltanr• w,%. j` the r•prosestations contained in the Aypiiesti•N for gev•3ap7!•n: Arr2•va: ie • eanl:tisn far appraysl enleae waived of mod- led by Nreerers ars-y }1 Ye *aszies. 1 F l� - rj•� . 4 l' t 9l Y a Q •'t u. _--- �a>o >-_,.t _ _, .... « .. ,..,'i��„ ....�.,i.'tT� , '�.,'�T,:t.ss.��;r..�.si_. R?.; t:�c i_ _ r.�..•�,..,,.`.L..`c.,aze'�YG .tir..s - _ . r a Jett � if?a ° 4ny .ir.r'•rvlj `` .. - raw •. A-12 - CITY Of Jiim= ) .. q _ i' I, I, RALPH G. ONGIZ, Clark of the.City of Miami, rlorlds. do hereby certify that the attached. and fort- going Pagea 1 through 11, inclusive, Contain a true and eorree: copy of Resolution no. s0-707 and pertinent (. Z hibit OAO, passed and ado ted p by the City of via..i Coar..ission at its meeting hold on SspttrjDer 25, 1910. � M277,•tii MY MAtr'D and the official Seal of the City j t' of Miami, rlorida, this 2rd day of October, 1910. RUPM G. ot7C.I _ CITY CLM c0rr2C2AIt S9AL) • y i•r4acosa - Oeputy City. Clerk' �Y� - ', J J•t}., KY ;� _±6..s�•e.=i,�_;-'.rait+s'-"Fc',..`?ie"t s'.,k}.,ryszk"#}:�i3 ' 2 'fin %'t''' i , �+`yJ, ,4� aeuVa'C�iFz�sxb�. ai.c4-,??.k..t.-t...m. ...�_.33' __' EXHIBIT "B" Attached to, and made a part of Resolution June 26, DEVELOPMENT ORDER (AS AMENDED JUNE 26, 1986) Let it be known that pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes, the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida has con- sidered in public hearing held on May 24, 1979, the issuance of a f Development Order for Ball Point, a Development of Regional Impact, to be located in the City of Miami, and has considered in public hearing held on June 26, 1986, the issuance of an amended Development Order for the Miami Center I Project (a/k/a Ball Point Project), a Development of Regional Impact, located in the ## City of Miami. Pursuant to Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes and t after due consideration of the consistency of this proposed Development with pertinent regulations, and the Report and Recom- mendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council dated February 41 1986, the Commission took the following action: 2 Approval of this Development, as amended, ,< with the following modifications concerning and limited to that portion of the Develop- _} meet located on the Southern (3.01 acres) portion -of Tract D, Block 1, Dupont Plaza (hereinafter "Biscayne Plaza"): 1. Biscayne Plaza shall contain not more than: (a) Phase 2 jLgg Units/Sgaces Area (Gross SgUar,a ,Feet) Office (in Tower) 600,000 1722' A14SL + 65' Antenna) _ Garden Office (in Building Base) 100,000 Retail (in Tower and Building Base) 160,000 Note: All language in this Exhibit "B" is new language. Although underlining has not been used, all language in Exhibit "B" should be interpreted as if it were underlined. Page 1 of 16 Residential** 60 units 120000 ( !�n Tower) _ Parking a Service Area 1,200 spaces -- Sub-Total. ( Phase I) 980,000 (b) Phase II Office (in Tower) 780,000 (884' AMSL + 65' Antenna) Retail (in Tower) 60,000 Residential** 90 units 1800000 (in office Tower) Sub -Total (Phase II) 1,020,000 * Equivalent to 600,000 gross square feet. ** Office use maybe substituted for residential use at > the option of Applicant without such action being con- sidered -an amendment of this Development Order and not, therefore, subject to the approval of the City of Miami Commission. Total Biscayne Plaza Project (Excluding Parking & Service Area) 2.000.000 The. schematic design drawings (Sheets 1-13) for Biscayne Plaza dated January 21, 1986, as amended by drawings dated May 2, 1986, 1 submitted by Schleicher -Soper, Architects, show 6 floors of residential in the Phase I tower and 9 floors of residential in the Phase II tower. Office use may be substituted for all or any portion of such residential use, at the option of Applicant, :x without such action being considered an amendment of this -,5 Development Order, nor shall any such change require the approval of the City of Miami Commission. 't Each Office Tower may include, at the option of Applicant, a health club (1 floor); a restaurant (1 floor); an executive club (1 floor), and restaurant and cabaret on the top of the podium (i.e. on the roof, or llth floor). These uses are included in the computation of "Retail" shown above. Page Z of 28 3 tx � dix ,t^s. r The rink and roof garden on the podium level are considered "open space." THE DEVELOPER, ITS SUCCESSORS AND/OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY AND SEVER- ALLY, SHALL-. Envi ent 2. Remove all invasive exotic plants from the project site as the site is cleared and shall use only those plant species specified in Attachment 1 hereto in future project landscaping. 3. Have a professional archaeologist on -site during all earth- work; notify State and County archaeologists of construction schedules delay construction up to three months in any area . where potentially significant historic or archaeological artifacts are uncovered, and for a reasonable time and in a Y manner calculated to minimize any interference with con- struction, permit State and local historic preservation ' officials to survey and excavate the site. 4...: 4. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit for Phase I, provide a performance bond in the amount of $500,000 for the construction of a Riverwalk on the 20' shoreline setback - /pedestrian easement already required to be dedicated by the terms. of this Development Order (the "Riverwalk"). Applicant shall provide, at its sole cost, furniture, light- ing and landscaping of a quality and design consistent with the City of Miami Riverwalk and Baywalk Guides and Standards S (the "Guidelines") in effect at the time of adoption of this Development Order. Applicant shall submit final landscape plans for the Riverwalk to the Planning Department and the Planning Department shall, in consultation with the Fire Department, review said landscape plans in order to deter- mine whether Guidelines. 6. Guidelines, the Planning Department shall approve them. If the landscape plans are not consistent with the Guidelines, the Planning Department may either approve or disapprove them. If the landscape plans are disapproved, the Planning Department shall promptly state why they are inconsistent with the Guidelines and Applicant shall redo the landscape plans accordingly. Approval of the landscape plans, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, shall be a condition precedent to the issuance of a Building Permit for Phase I of Biscayne Plaza. Applicant shall incorporate, in Phase I of Biscayne Plaza, a minimum of 20,000 gross square feet of sidewalk cafes, restaurants and other retail use in the area immediately- adjacent to the Riverwalk. Applicant shall retain the right to prohibit any commercial use, assembly, entertainment or other abnormal or non -pedestrian use of the Riverwalk. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for Biscayne Plaza Phase I, Applicant shall, at its sole cost, construct and complete an appropriate focal point landmark (such as a water feature, artwork, landscape, lighting and/or seating) to be an integral part of the Project, at or adjacent to the southerly end of S. Biscayne Boulevard (extended). The choice of such landmark shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Department, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. During the construction of Biscayne Plaza, Applicant shall place rip -rap, temporary berms or other barriers to prevent discharge of construction -related runoff into the Bay. 7. Applicant shall design, construct, and maintain the storm - water management system to meet the following standards: Page 4 of 16 Construct permanent berms or barriers, at least one toot -above grade, along the eastern and southern perimeter --of the site. r.. Retain the runoff from a 25®year storm on -site, and con- struct the drainage system in accordance with all representations in the amended Application for Develop- ment Approval. Route any and all parking area washdown water through oil and grease interceptors to a sanitary sewer line or pro- l; hibit any and all washdown of parking garages. r 8. Incorporate into the development, by restrictive covenant and lease or sale agreements, hazardous materials -accident i prevention, mitigation,' and response standards. At a minimum, these standards shall: Require that any areas within buildings where hazardous materials or hazardous wastes are to be used, generated, j, or stored shall be constructed with impervious floors, : without drains, to ensure containment and to facilitate cleanup of any spill or leakage. Require that the loading/unloading of any hazardous mate- rial or hazardous waste shall occur in a covered loading/unloading dock with a spill containment area not .` connected to the project drainage or sewer system. ¢ Prohibit any outside storage of hazardous materials or hazardous waste. Require all hazardous waste generators to contract with a licensed public or private hazardous waste disposal ser- vice or processing facility and to provide to the Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) copies of one of the following forms of documenta- tion of proper hazardous waste management practices: a hazardous waste manifest; ` - proof of shipment to a permitted hazardous waste man- agement facility; or confirmation of receipt of materials from a recycling or a waste exchange operation. j'- Ti T.; ej 4 Notify any tenant generating wastes of the penalties for improper disposal of hazardous waste pursuant to Sec- tion 403.727, Florida Statutes. Allow reasonable access to records and facilities for monitoring by the City, GERM, and the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation to ensure compliance with this Development Order, and all applicable laws and regulations. For the purposes of this Development order, a hazardous waste generator shall be defined as the Applicant and any tenant of the Applicant that falls under a SIC code listed t in Attachment 3 attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and that uses, stores, or generates hazardous wastes. Hazardous wastes are defined as ignitable, corro- sive, toxic, or reactive wastes, including those identified in Attachment 4; provided, however, that the uses in Attach- ment 3 and the wastes in Attachment 4 shall be simultane- ously amended upon the addition or deletion of any or all of the listed uses, materials, or wastes by amendment to the "County and Regional Waste Assessment Guidelines" incorpo- rated by reference into Rule 17-31.03(21), Florida Administrative Code. Safety and Security, 9. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit for Biscayne Plaza Phase I, enter into an agreement with the City to contribute. a fair share for capital facilities required to provide adequate fire service to the project. 10. Cooperate with the City of Miami Fire Department to ensure that appropriate fire safety measures are incorporated into the project design and construction. Construction documents. shall be subject to the approval of the Fire Marshal. Page 6 of 16 11. Cooperate with the City of Miami Police Department to incor- posate adequate security measures and systems into the design and operation of Biscayne Plaza. Applicant shall submit the design schematic drawings prepared by Schleicher- -Soper, Architects, dated January 21, 1986, as amended by drawings dated May 2, 1986 to the Police Department within six months after the adoption of this Development Order. The Police Department may request more detailed construction documents and, at their option, may prepare a safety and security report. Applicant shall, upon written request of the Director, inform the Planning Department of 'how and to what extent the recommendations of the Police Department, if any, have been incorporated into the design and operation of Biscayne Plaza. 12. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit for Biscayne Plaza Phase I, Applicant shall, if required by the City, _$ enter into an agreement with the City to contribute a fair share of Police capital facilities needed to resolve City concerns reasonably attributable to Biscayne Plaza. .13. If required by the City, Applicant shall provide, during and as part of the initial construction of Biscayne Plaza, inte- rior or roof space (at Applicant's discretion) on either or = both of the towers for a communications antenna for the City's emergency communication system. Said antenna and appurtenances, together with necessary services, shall be at City of Miami expense. The Applicant shall retain the right of architectural, structural and engineering approval.* 14. Incorporate the following energy conservation measures into the development: t P09e-7 of 16 . ........... a. Maximum flexibility of air conditioning systems to cool only occupied areas (on a floor -by -floor basis at mini- mum). b. Air distribution using variable air volume systems, if feasible. c. Minimum air conditioning energy efficiencies (EER) of 10.0 in buildings.less than or equal to 250,000 square feet, and 12.0 in buildings over 250,000 square feet. d. Heat producing areas and equipment (cooking, water heat- ing, etc.) isolated from air conditioned areas. e. Computerized elevator control system in all structures over 10 stories. f. Natural gas or other non -electric energy sources for cooking and water heating in restaurants, where fea- sible. g. Solar water heaters or waste heat recovery units to preheat cooking and washing hot water in restaurants, etc., where feasible. h. Hot water temperatures set at or below 105OF where allowed by health codes and equipment requirements. i. Lavatory water flow of 0.8 gallons 'per minute or less than water closets that use no more than three and one- half gallons per flush. �. Tinted glass to reduce the amount of direct sunlight entering air conditioned areas. k. Light -reflecting and/or light colored wall and roof 't surfaces, with solar absorption coefficients less than or equal to 0.50. 1. Electrical metering on a floor -by -floor basis. m. Computerized energy management system capable of start stop optimization, demand limiting, lighting control, and zonal control. A statement showing extent of design compliance with these criteria, from the engineer(s) responsible for design of the mechanical, plumbing and electrical systems, shall be filed Page 9 of 16 *'• , :Jil{ �LYY with the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a Building Permit for each phase of Biscayne Plaza. 15. Incorporate the following into the project design and opera- tion to minimize the cumulative impact of project traffic, and its associated pollutant emissions, on air quality: Designate three percent of on -site employee parking spaces, located as close as possible to elevator and building entrances, for exclusive carpool or vanpool use. Actively encourage and promote car and van pooling by establishing a car pool information program. . Provide Metrorail; Metrobus, and Metromover route and schedule information in convenient locations throughout the project. In the event (i) Applicant leases 600 parking spaces in a parking garage to be constructed on one of the three adjacent vacant blocks in DuPont Plaza and (ii) a building has previously been built on the area immediately adjacent to the Biscayne Plaza project and across Biscayne Boulevard, then Applicant shall fund, design and construct an upper level pedestrian connection across S. Biscayne Boulevard, between the Biscayne Plaza project and the adjacent 'r building, subject to the recommendation of the City of Miami j Department of Public Works and subject to the issuance of a x special permit by the Miami City Commission specifying physical clearances and amounts of public liability insur- ance, ,.K 17a. Prior to obtaining a Building Permit for Biscayne Plaza, Phase I, Applicant shall replat*the southern 3.01 acres of Tract D, Block 1, DuPont Plaza (50-11). Applicant will dedicate all necessary easements and rights -of --way which are located on the southern portion of Tract D, Block 1, DuPont Plaza (i.e., the Biscayne Plaza property) which are for Biscayne Plaza and which are required by the City, CciuM, or State in carder to construct transportation improvements made necessary exclusively by Biscayne Plaza, including the second -level pedestrian system referred to in Condition 16, above, if. constructed; provided, however, that nothing in this Paragraph 17(a) shall require Applicant to grant or otherwise dedicate any easement or right-of-way the existence of which would unreasonably interfere with the construction or design of Biscayne Plaza as shown in sheets 1 through 13 of the drawings dated January 21, 1986 as amended by drawings dated May 2 1986,- submitted by Schleicher -Soper, Architects. 17b. In the event that construction of the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System has not begun, then, prior to obtain- ing.any building permits for Biscayne Plaza, Applicant shall fund or construct 100 percent of the interim roadway improvements identified as A(1), A(2), A(3) and A(4) in Attachment 5 (or suitable replacement mutually agreed upon by the City's Department of Public Works, Applicant, and SFRPC staff). 17c. Prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy for Phase II of Biscayne Plaza, fund, bond, construct or provide a letter of credit to Florida Department of Transportation ("FDOT") for 100 percent of the costs of any roadway modifications identified by FDOT, South Florida Regional Planning Council ("SFRPC") Staff or the Applicant, that exclusively serve Biscayne Plaza traffic. 17d. If a public sector financing package has not been committed prior to December 31, 1991, then, prior to obtaining any building permits for Biscayne Plaza Phase II, front-end, which may include arranging loans to, or bond purchases p49e 10 of 16 from, appropriate government agencies, $517000 (1905 dollars) to FDOT, based on an equitable reimbursement agree- ment among appropriate parties which shall specify interest rates and maturity 4atea, as the development's fair share contribution to the Brickell Avenue Bridge replacement. 17e.' If a public sector financing package has not been committed prior to December 31, 1991 then, prior to obtaining any building permits for Biscayne Plaza Phase II, front-end, which may include arranging loans to, or bond purchases from, appropriate government agencies, $5027000 to FDOT, based on an equitable reimbursement agreement among appropriate parties which shall specify interest rates and maturity dates, as the developments' fair share contribution to the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System. 18. Integrate all original and supplemental ADA information into a Consolidated Application for Development Approval (CADA) and submit two copies of the CADA to the Council, one copy to the City, and one copy to the Florida Department of Community Affairs within thirty (30) days of the effective date of the Development Order; provided however, that nothing set forth in the CADA which relates to Biscayne Plaza shall be binding in any way upon the owner of "Miami Center Existing" (the northern, developed portion of Miami Center I consisting of the Pavillon Hotel, the Edward Ball Office Building and garage and associated uses), its succes- sors and/or assigns. The CADA shall be prepared as follows: a. Where new, clarified, or revised information has been prepared subsequent to submittal of the ADA but prior to issuance of the DO, whether in response to a formal statement of information needed or otherwise, the origi- 4 i 'Y nal pages of the ADA will be replaced with revised pages.- b. Revised pages will have a "page Number (R) Date" nota- tionp with "Page Number" being the number of the original page, "(R)" indicating that the page was revised, and "Date" stating the date of the revision. 19. Within 30 days of the effective date of this Development 20. Order, record the Miami Center I Development Order with the Clerk, Dade County Circuit Court, pursuant to Sec- tion 380.06(14)(d), Florida Statutes (1985) specifying that this Exhibit B to the Development Order runs with the southern portion of Tract D, Dupont Plaza (50-11) (a/k/a Biscayne Plaza Phases I and II) and is binding on Miami Center Joint venture, its successors, and/or assigns, jointly or severally. Submit an annual report to the SFRPC, the City, and the Florida Department of Community Affairs on each anniversary of the effective date of the Development Order, which report shall include, at a minimum: a. A complete response to each question in Exhibit 6. Identification and description of any changesin the plan of development, or in the representations contained in the ADA, or in the phasing for the reporting year and for the next year. A summary comparison of Development activity proposed and actually conducted for the year. } Identification of undeveloped tracts of lard, other than {4 individual single family lots, that have been sold to a r: separate entity or developer. Identification and intended use of lands purchased, r leased or optioned by the developer adjacent to the project site since the Development Order was issued. Page 17 of 16 ft # � -- f. An assessment of the' Applicant's and the local govern- ment's compliance with the conditions of alpprdQ'al f contained in the DRI Development Order and the commit- mente which are contained in the Application for Development Approval. `. 9. Specification of any amended DRI Application for Development Approval or requests for a substantial devi- ation determination that were filed in the reporting year and to be filed during the next year. h. An indication of a change, if any, in local government jurisdiction for any portion of the development since c.' issuance of the Development Order. 4 L. A list of significant local, state and federal permits which have been obtained or which are pending by agency, type of permit, permit number, and purpose of each. j. A statement that all persons have been sent copies of the annual report in conformance with subsections 380.06(14) and (16), Florida Statutes. k. A copy of any recorded notice of the adoption of the Development Order or any subsequert modification that was recorded by the Applicant pursuant to Subsection• 380.06(14)(d), Florida Statues. 1. Copies of -one of the following documentations of appro- priate disposal of all hazardous waste: a hazardous waste manifest, a bill of lading from a bonded hazardous waste trans- i - porterindicatingn po indicatin g shi pment.to a licensed hazardous waste facility, or ' a confirmation of receipt of material from a ry recycler, a waste exchange operation, or other per- mitted hazardous waste management facility. m. Any other information required by the Department of Community Affairs ("DCA") in accordance with Section ' 380.06(14) and (16), Florida Statutes (1985). Pogo 13 ` of 16 - f fa �. a, TIE CITY SRALL: 21. Designate the Planning Director to monitor compliance with all conditions of this Development Order. Specific monitor- ing procedures shall include: a review and evaluation of the annual report to be sub- mitted by the Applicant pursuant to Condition 21 herein; and a review of Development Order conditions and compliance therewith prior to a recommendation that a Building Per- mit or Certificate of Occupancy be issued by the City pursuant to the conditions of this Development Order. 22. Incorporate the Biscayne Plaza Phase I and II timeline (Figure 7), which timeline will be used by the Planning Director in monitoring specific conditions of the Develop- ment Order as they relate to City permitting for specific components or phases; provided, however, that deviations from the timeline shall not be construed to be substantial deviations from the terms of this Development Order. 23a. Withhold building permits or Certificates of Occupancy, as the case may be, until the requirements of Conditions 4 and 5 have been met. b. Withhold issuance of Certificates of Occupancy for Biscayne Plaza until all interim road improvements identified in Condition 17(b) are constructed. c. Withhold a Certificate of Occupancy for Biscayne Plaza Phase II, until the terms of Condition 17(c) -have been satisfied. d. If a public sector financing package has not been committed prior to December 31, 1991, withhold issuance of any build- Page 14 of 16 J f � _�.�'_.;�4..'.x!•x_.-.s. �.Ltd.w_,..._..t."t:�s��`�.:3�c'�"`5.4.�.gr..,,.�.....-i:};�tr,.s'�is" ing permits for Biscayne Plaza Phase 11 until the Applicant has front -ended, which may include arranging loans to, or bond purchases from, appropriate government agencies, $517,000 to FDOT pursuant to Condition 17d. e. If a public sector financing package has not been committed by December 31, 1991, withhold issuance of Any building permits for Biscayne Plaza Phase II until the Applicant has t front -ended, which may include arranging loans to, or bond purchases from, appropriate government agencies, $5,027,000 to MOT pursuant to Condition 17e. f. Withhold issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.for. Biscayne _ f Plaza Phase II until construction has commenced on (i.e., 3 upon execution of a contract for the construction of) the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System. 26. Stipulate that the following actions considered by the SFRPC # in their Report and Recommendations dated February 4, 1986, sf which may be undertaken at the Applicant's sole option, with written notice to the Planning Director, shall not be con- -sidered to be an Amendment of this Development Order: a ' Substitution of up to 300,000 square feet of office use in place of an equivalent amount of residential use. Relocation or transfer of restaurants, health clubs and cabarets and other retail uses among the podium or towers of Phases I and II provided that total retail space does r; not exceed 220,000 square feet, or Substitution of any alternative plan of, or modification r to, the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System pre- ., sently approved by FDOT. ` Delays or advances in the timeline specified in Condi i' tion 24. P490 15 'Of 16 t �' -. ; i Y. t r- +.a�..�,a,A...,S,N�Fr�, . ;K �a_...:. > • r..-rx .. ... F:a,:;.,�*.��„�:n.m'ws.sks-�Ktc�.. '`�r{9�-=�—'`f=�� ��..:.��i M — - ,Y Any reduction in User amount of gross square feet or gross number of unite in either or both of Phase i +or Phase xx of Biscayne Plaza. Any shift in User amount of gross square feet or gross number of units from Phase i to Phase ii without any overall Project increase in same. OEVELOF+MENT W REGIONAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR MIAMI CENTER 1- Located In Miami a - 23.07 ,r SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING CWNCIL Februrary, 1996 31 r m � TABLE OF COMTENTS LIST OF FIGURES....................................................... LIST OF TABLES......................................................... LIST OF EXHIBITS...................................................... itI INTRODUCTION.......................................................... 1 PART i. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................ 4 A. APPLICANT INFORMATION .................................. t,. @. PROJECT INFORMATION .................................... 4 PARTAI. i . PROJECT IMPACTS AI43 ISSUES ................................. 11. ,. A. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES ...................... 1t z 4: Be ECONOMY ................................................ 15 C. PUBLIC FACILITIES ...................................... 20 r ._.-. .. 0. TRANSPORTATION ......................................... 25 PART 111. COMMENTS FROM OTHER AGENCIES ............................... 51 - PART t V. SUO+MARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................ 74 - `A LIST OF FIGURES Flguro No. Title Pace 1 Location Map ............................................. 9 3; 2 Master Development Plan .................................. 7 ' 3 8lscayne Plaza South Elevation ........................... $ .i Traffic Impact Area ...................................... 28 S Proposed M*difications to the Downtown Distributor :. Bifurcated Ramp System ................................... 38 u z 6 Current FDOT Design for the Downtown Distributor , LY' Bifurcated Ramp System ................................... --at 7 Exi-stingnt Mover Station ................... 49 x .Dowown.People { . �y dtE - - _ am, LIST OF TABLES r=+ Title ..' 11, Previous Development Plans 6 2 Proposed Development and Phasing ......................... 9 3 Environmental issues ..................................... 12 4-. Construction Costs ....................................... 15 S te Permanent Employment Impacts (Alterna1) ............... 17 6 Permanent Employment Impacts (Alternate 2) ............... 18 t, 7" Permanent Employment by Sector (Alternate -I) ............. 19 1'.. B Permanent Employment by Sector (Alternate 2) ............. 19 9 Fiscal Impact (Alternate 1) .............................. 21 10 Fiscal Impact (Alternate 2) ................. .....ar.....a 22 11 Watery Westewater, and Solid Waste ....................... 20 12 Existing Traffic Condltions .............................. 27 13 Programed Transportation Improvements ................... 30 , .14 Major Committed Developments ............................. 31 1STrip Genera#ion Rates .................................... 32 16 Cumulative Transportation Impacts ........................ 33 s a .17 Cumulative 1994 Peak Hour Traffic - AM ................a.. 34 18 .Cumulative 1994 Peak Hour Traffic - PM ............o..r... 3d 19 MMooddificetlons, to thq�e Downtown Dlstrlbu+or Bifurcated Rempso Dupont Plaza Task Force .a...a........a........... '.. 37f 20 1994 Levels of Service with Project 'traffic and Im{proverments.... **sea 37 r_. r' 21 Additional Improvements +o the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System ....... 40 22 CrItIca1 lntersectlons Without 81furcated Ramp $ys+edm 47 �ki, .; r'.. _: .. ��... y 4 10 ., ,. �•. ,•t.r ?.,aa .4 s r �; i._.. .. . ,... ,. .. ,. .... Y. LIST OF VNIB1T5 Exhibit No. Title 1 Code for Waste TYPes Conmoniy Assoclated with Each SIC Industry ...................................... 94 2 List of Potential Hazardous Waste Generators by SICCode ............................................... 95 = 3 Recommended Plant Species .............................. 100 4 Proposed interim Transportation Improvements ........... 1C4 r, SMaster Development Plan ................................ 107 6 Annual Status Report ................................... 109 R ± a _u.,.... .. «. YY it _ _u„�C. v_2r zsi��. ,e..4�`i%tttiv3.' ��.V�•i,`.?"=g3..f5..i9$l,..b..\P..]7�rx :'L�:uf`aM'�"';aAtfH. fit"=d��.YXNN�n�=."fi4mtadit�T �rN`�i �..:n$.f - _ 4 INTRODUCTION , {: in May, 1979, the Council reviewed and approved the MIamt grater 1 Appiicatton for Development Approval, located on a parcel of land in the _ N,<, Dupont Plaza area known as Hall Point, and recommended project approval, subject to 10 conditions, to the City of Muni. At the time of action on # F: Miami Center 1, the Applicant, hblywell Corporation, was also planning to r develop the remaining four blocks of Dupont Plaza. A primary concern expressed by Council members was that these remaining four blocks be ' master planned and developed with an integrated, compatible design and Unix of.uses to create a quailty urban environment in the core of downtown Miami. Further, since public agency planning for a final transportation system �. to:support the full buiidout of Dupont Plaza was In.the process at tl» timie of the review of Miami Center 19 the Council only required that t:+e ,-a V Applicant develop an Interim traffic operettons plan and implement those roadway. -Improvements which would both support project traffic and be compatible with whatever ultimate transportation solution might, finally be adopted for the anttre area. On iay 24. 1979. +he City issued :a Development Order, incorporating 17 eonditlone including the requti°ement �9 b L for interim traffic imeprovements prior to issuance of building pormits, 5j approving Miami Center 1. Fblywelt Corporation later secured options on three of the four remaining blocks In Dupont Plaza. On July 11, 11980, Southeast Sanko owner of ne northeastern black$ submitted an ADA to the Council to construct a new ` Southeast Flnenclol Center on the fourth block. On. July 1`'e. 1960. xme W. ;i �n 5 C t 4 � f `` � cr =i...:.1 t 'a. ( S. s 3 t F 4 lt i i, L t T'f@=1�� �4��.t F 4.f Ct`t < < f^^.• v..d o- .,; ,r- -.wit.-F..,.w` -.,.s> • (i.;. �t w.is�u-�°Ft a.l»' r ' S .»=-t .32-,d?tuL.r�s 6.J .e.�-E 3 .. _— r• 1'- 8 �k ut; nt -j: MolyaelI Corporation submitted an ADA to construct Miami Center If on the other three blocks. Both ADAs were subsequently approved by the Council vx . and the City. ' Council staff strongly urged the Dupont Plaza area DRI developers to cooperate in Jolntly developing a final transportation Improvement plan which would 1) provide acceptable levels of service in Dupont Plaza at r full buildout, and 2) be compatible with public plans for the I-93 -bifurcated ramp extension and the Downtown People Mover system in Dupont Plaza. The Applicants agreed to cooperate with each other and with a task force of City, County, and State staff to develop an ultimate f; roadway and transit system to support the three developments. ((s(( yAAs cork began on the development of a final transportation solution for ryr full but Idout of Dupont Plaza, Holywell Corporation was ready to obtain �a its building permits for the now existing portion of Miami Center 1. it seemed prudent and certainly cost-effective to wait to determine what interim Improvements should be required for Miami Center I until the "i final transportation solution was developed. Therefore, on September 25, 3 1980, the City of Miami Commission approved an amendment to the hiami Center 1 Development Order# which postponed the requirement for Interim improvements from prior to building permits to prior to Issuing j; certificates of occupancy. Since 1980, the Southeast P.ank Financial Center has been constructed in r� Dupont Plaza: however, the Miammi Canter 11 proJ*ct was never started and its Development Order expired in 1905. Because the now -expired Miami ,§13{' r g, 2 0?A+7 Ik r �� i e •.'-V ' .BSI ti Center 11 Development Order reflected the impacts and Applicant 'fair share' for regional roadway improvements for both Miami Center I and 11, and the impacts of Miami Center I have changed due to substantial modifications to the project, this assessment reevaluates the impacts of the Miami Center 1. This assessment of the Miami Center I development has been prepared by the South Florida Regional Planning Council, as required by the Florida Environmental land and Water Management Act for all Developments of Regional Impact. The assessment is based on information supplied by the Applicant, MI.ani and Dade County staff, official plans, consultants, and field inspection..,.. Addlttonal research relative to specific issues was conducted by Council staff where needed. In accordance with the Act, this assessment provides an overview of the positive and nege+ive Impacts iiktly to result from the proposal, The recodmendations ere intended to assist the City Comission in reaching a decision on the proposed development through consideration of regional, In addition to local, Impacts and issues. Copies of any "development order" tan order granting, denying, or granting with conditlons an application for a development permit) issued with regard to this project must be transmitted to the South Florida Regional Planning Council and the Florida Departsont of CwwKmity Affairs. 4 r jj 7 T" .7. T IRTINT—i M177 sit c SM FZRL.J 'rates, ED MIAMI CENTER 11 .60* so *Iosiossa fS set 04 • .. - - ...dam _.. .tX%; Sad _ i , 7e j; t i.: AREYIOW DIVELPK001 PLA14 i; }tf,O[Klt'AKMT ALL POINT 0111 GALL f/O1MT/MIANI WITIN 1 O111 f'lA// •MAC 1/70 �•�a% GUILT . 1� � . r . cost e`Orolr ��� 3elI6.+ v I�Iff %= ice" .Units i Office Tear ftt# 0 MIA Office TMr 701.000 M/A 5' NAM Tower 9"'ODO 63O "I Tower e+if,DOO 634 ' h1I•e.ln1uN Q1 we(elIp1 • Tears Tear/ 43200" no One No %fit 6s • p!0 �!0 Tile Nlt %I It a Total Ml.700 900 Total s+ Metal 1 MIA Metal 1 �SEAM MIA:*i2 r Orif A Teat 2.3011.700 1,130 grow Tool 1.71ir300 x a sOl/1G[I W. YM'C Potosi 1 of the original Sall Point OR1, which includes the 35•story', Edward Be i 1 Of f i ce Bu i I d Ing, +he 35-story Paw i I lore Mate I, a ':five -story retaillparking structure (825 spaces), and a 325-space office getrage, has been constructed on +he northern portion of the >a site. This developed portion of the project, known as Bail Point Pleaze,.was the subject of foreclosure proceedings against-Molyweli Corporation In.October, 1985, and is now controlled by the Bank of Now York. The southern portion of the site, which is undeveloped, is owned by Miemi Center Jolnt Venture and is +he subject of a contract of sale option to Russel Wirth end Company. This erea, originally proposed to contain 500 total condominium units In two towers, proposes two predominantly office towers known as Biscayne Pieiza Phase l and 2 :.,;. (figures 2 and 3). r �s FIGURE 3 ; BISCAYNE PLAZA SOUTH ELEVATION. l 1 - U~.%%mp-G *ft r M omp mail" fto s c left ac , •r.� �Ati iMlrwA t� r►�ay � �ow� - . ti.s A 4. 4 M rrr #+J+w trw.''- - i mr Watawt lx- _..' rY� ! %a. .. :.. gun 1 /19ew SaMc ADA 4 �'. iz+w... i.1 .% •• ) ,. i. ... an. .>• .i�.-t �t. .f, :v. ..._iA.T...a.F :'�5`.S_ $SS r$�x:.+'wn. . i ._ '.: ✓Ir a.E'.F.&T 3t,.A`isFn-il'eNMst:63 r:�3..F� f,uAL !' i `4 Y'si try 4�a'rT - '(tsiTrhis;5k ldti:'-.lsiiu'.'n%ii9 f --. Include 90 executive apartment units (180,000 square feet), 609000 square feet of retail space, and 780,000 square feet of office space. if market conditions are not favorable for the 150 dwelling units proposed in Phases 1 and 29 the 300,000 square f**+ will be converted to office space. THE 2 _ IROlOSED DlrElall[nT It10 RISSHRi Of flees Total rNIMIMcglaft pwo:. ISO, rt.) 0111"•1 f /f.! ISMMLI• lam, Vt.1 Igetll om~ 71119000 634 uhlts 0111.2117 0 1N0 11i1s tnitllu� aN.000 S.r. Dlseev" 114"0 700.000 0 100100 60 Units I11117 1714 f n* l 1MIM S.F. fleet. /MIw1 Blocs, a Plus 760.41M 0 60.000 20 Miss 11111110 4111111 fhge 2 • If she eWket Is #Af*WWssls ter Constrldtlett of the 130 rsstsswtlel whits. - - sM Irp1ICMt11 Will 001"OfNCt the SM.= sayers f•,f N efflCe sgCe. - - t 9 s t" 7 z A "Itrbor Promenade" along the southern boundary of the site (adjacent to the Bay/River) will be constructed to provide a podestrlan connection from the Bayslde project, through.Bayfront Park•. to Miami Center. Ground floor retail/conm erciel space will be lcceted adjacent to the Promenade. 1 ' v1: - - ' t0 2 � c "i. �w �-ui . .. x. z 3 V I�AGyi4�.?}.• 4. i,wL'� ,NA1'j^43�s`u`'".'idUif'`c'a'7..£?-:-.�.`1f'.W.}iv �sx �-.�a '-s�"?id �.a�.43"5'�4� { .. 1� _ __ ' Lei 's No TABLE S ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES 'f ISSUE COMA :d Air Quel tty See 2. by;ex+ansive A Lend and Solis The project site was created filling of Biscayne Bay In the beginning of this century. Maps dating as for back' as 1899 show the+ the historic shoreline of Biscayne Bay followed the present location of Biscayne Boulevard. Some filling be to ; additional may necessary bring the site to required flood elevations. Exposed areas should be sprayedg mulched t1js, or grassede as necessary, to prevent soil• erosion. 1... 3 Flood Prone Areas The site Is located In a 100 "er flood a area and the minimum first f loor elevation, spec i f led by the federal 1 nsurance x1n Administration is +14.0 NGVD. According to the Applicants the ground floors retails offices and parking uses will be bull+ et a minimum elevation of +5 feet NGVD, which meats Dada County but not federal flood criteria. Occupants of the r. ground floor will not be.eligtble for federal flood insurance. All other areas l- of the project will be above +14 feet NGVD• and therefore will be eligible for federal flood insurance. Fr Maier, Drelnage,.end Sep 3. He=ardous Materials ,. iMtl.ands, veW01on, The site does no+ contain any wetlands or OW Wildlife significan+ vegetations and is of tittle value to wildlife. Only those oten+ species Listed in Exhlb1+ 3 should - be used In future project iendscaping. Historical and Arehasolaglcat According to the Dade County Historic Sites Survey, significant archaeological features _ and/or art 1 factuaE l data may be etepos l trui :. , { beneath fii1 along the western boundary of the site. The Lade County archaeologist should be notlfled of the construc+lon tx schedule :and aIlowed access to the site .. for mon l taring, and in ar6haeo loot-0 '4hou t d f, be on slte during g project serail+ work. if finds any archaeological sm; mede � oo true tion should be delayed In that portion Of the site untli officials c0n't816-sctlons to survey an d/or° excaysta the art l fps'. SF: AOA SFRPC.' 1 } • Flood Prone Areas Mate, Oreln'"o, and Itzardous Materials ` Matiands, Vegetation, and Wildlife Historical and Archaeological Sties.. as IM show that the historic shoreline of Biscayne lay followed the present location of Biscayne Boulevard. Sane additional filling may be necessary to bring the site to required flood elevations. Exposed areas should be sprayed* mulched. or'gressed, as necessary, to prevent soil erosion. The site is located in a 100 or flood area and the minims first floor'elevation specified by the Federal Insurance Administration is +14.0 NGVD. According to the Applicant, the ground floor, retelle office, end parking uses rill be built et a mini+ elevation of +5 feet NG%D, which meets Dade 0*unty but eat federal flood criterlo. Occupants of the ground floor will not be eligible for, federal flood insurance. All other areas. of the project rill be above +14 feet NW, and ♦herofore will be eligible for federal flood insurance. See 3. The site was not contain any wo4londs or significant vegetation, and Is of little value to wildlife. Only those giant species Ilsted In Exhlblt 3 should . be used in future project tondscaping. According to the Dade County Historic Survey, significant archaeological features and/or ortlfoctuol data may be'deposlted . . beneath flit along the western boundary of the sits. The Dade County archaeologist Should be notlfiod of the construction schedule and allo"d access.th +he site for monitoring, and an archwotoilw+ ''thou1d be on sine during project earth work. If any erchaw f ogi ca l finds am M►: struc- tlon should be delayed in that por't'lon of thi stir& until officials can"#aW a&lons Although the CO concentrations adjacent t0 the Miami Center i project (in Sayfront Park) are not projected to exceed standards, project traffic alone contributes 3.7 ppm (41 percent of State standard) to the eight hour CO concentration. The Applicant should Incorporate the transportation and air quality impact reduction strategies listed in Condition 1 into project design and/or operation. 3. Maier, Draintce, and Hazardous Materials Soil borings done by the Applicant In 1979 showed that groundwater beneath the site is approximately 5 feet below existing grade. Groundwater beneath the site is saline and should not be used for human consumption or irrigation. There tic ere no surface water bodies orn-sito. Biscayne Say. a State Aquatic Preserve and iWtstanding Florida Water. Is located immediately east of the project site. - According to the Applicant, the drainage system for the existing portion of Miami Center directs stormwater to a perimeter exfiltration system trench. Runoff that exceeds the ;t capacity of the trench system flows into detention tanks one then to drainage wells, which discharge runoff to the saline aquifer.- The system is capable of handling the 25myear storm. `. The proposed Miami Center drainage system wi 1 l be deslgnaauA to ..'` hand i e a 25-year storm in the same manner described ebove. Only runoff In excess of the 25-year design storm will leave t1e site. i w p 11 -.S. Tm Applicant has proposed to maintain the parking garage by washing down the paved surfaces and then routing the wasndown water, which contain a greater amount of, and more highly concentrated, pol wants then runoff from other on -site impervious, surfaces, through oil and grease interceptors into a sanitary sewer. This washdown program will no+.allow discharge of polluted washdown water to the Biscayne Aquifer. During construction of the remainder of Miami Center I, the } Applicen+ should place rip -rap, temporary berms, or other barriers along the perimeter of the site to proven+•discharge of construction -related runoff to the Bay. The design and � T construction of the project should also include permenent berms :. or barriers, a+ lees+ one foot above grade, so that olrect discharge to the Bay does not occur after +he project is 1.. IMP l ate . _ Another source of water pollution, potentially even more - hormfuI than stormwater runoff, is hazardous waste. Hazardous Mete is defined by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the State es waste that is ignl+abie, corrosive, reactive, or toxic. Ex4ibi+..1, included et +he end of this ORI Assessment, is a List of Standard industrial Classification (SIC) codes for facilities that have been found to provide cos or more of the ` ,hazardous wastes lls+ed in Exhibit 2. These lists are ' excerpted from the Florida Hater Qual 1+y Ass.urenco Act 1A } y +r- r v +. `< regulations, and all facilities that fall within these SIC codes are required by the Act to provide information regarding types and amounts of was4s generated at the facility end how this waste is being managed. It is likely that potential smell quantity hazardous waste • f generators will be occupants of Miami Center 1. The Applicant has proposed to cover loading woes to exclude rainwater. Implementation of the additional measures 1istee in Condition 3 will furt!4er reduce the possibility of adverse impact on regional water quality. 9. ECOMMY �} 1. Project Coss k {; �. Table 4 summarizes project costs, including eonstructlon employment and wages. t Tau / �S COISTRLCTiON COSTS it 1.00010 Plus ,IoCSMM 919CoNy ► an 1 le OW 1*40 CWr !•ifs t, t"s n� 1 PROW 2 TNr1 'eft :Lam ' 3t.t100 dt.11p0 Joe LAM• 42.0E* 34,"0 3011" f V AN . W 1"Ovlals i3100@ 90.WO ".310 16012W 75 ' iAtNiit 13 Cwer priwr got Lion ftp4 knaoe Milelfw»y LOON 2.0" 1.300 0.500 g0 ;< ` Qtlbrr < " TOTAL" 120. WO 11 i.300 T®1 D0 311.200 s, V- - F: TVtrl Project .tort • 016.2 IbiliMP" coltstryctle" loplopent . 306 Wolovows far y0ir for !year$ • 14.1 % away" yebrok. _ rr CpnstrKtloo /ryas . 107.6 olifiiw 022.116 Wr il+aloyer veer for 4W4P1 tx COMO? Exlrtirs. U2.21i Wr flW"" year fir Placs" of&". ph"t 1. i.4 122.323 W ililwioeo Vast for 9116COW4 plan. ih*" ail a irRs sellers. ei Efftiuslt+0 iwltbr�tst sts. Iowa f W All 9 ca. 2. Permanent Employment Total permanent project employment Is es+lme+*d to be 12,144 for Alternate 1, which Includes 150 resideWal unl+s (300,000 square feet), and 13,537 for Alternate 2, which Includes 300,000 additional square feet of office space and residential units. Because a majority of firms locating In now offices move from other office buildings In the Region, only &Wu+ 25 percent of the jobs can be considered now to the Region. For Alternate 1, assuming 2,497 now project employees, the Council estimates that now project employment, by its indirect and Induced effects, could generate up to 5,442 now jobs In the Region, with 1,637, 39716, and 69 In Browad, Dade, and *nroe, respeeflvely. This employment corresponds to $108.5 million In total wages and S184.1 million in value added to the regional economy (Table 5). Alternate 29 assuming 2..782 now project employees, could gemraft up to 6,100 now jobs In the Region, with 1,857. 4.165. and 78 In ®coward. Dade, and Monroe, respeOlvely. This ..OmploVmen+ corresponds to $121.5 million in total wages and SMA million In value added to the regional economy (Table Table 7 shows the sec+oral distribution of persafte'O employment for Alternate I and Table 8 shows the dls+rlbu+ion for Wernaft 2. 16 17 Fes; i4J TABLE S • •EINANENT EMPLOvKWT IMPACTS (ALTE11W1TE 1) •a A. EM�LOtMENT 10. /LA. I" "A110 VAN ""OE REGION KACH , �IIOIICLLTWE• /OIES"r. FISHING 0.• 0.• 0.• 0.• 0.• AIIIICILTUTAL KIIVICES 3. S. i. 10. 4• AIMING 1. 1. 0. CON+�tI1UCTI ON U. Ill. 3. 105. It. ; IMrtRACTt/tINo 73. • IN.. 1. 26t. 62. 7NANSPOItTATION AND UTILITIES 45. 227. 2. 274, 21. Oft[SALE TRACE 21. 113. t. 112. la. A RETAIL TRADE 300. 475. 10. 7M. U1. = FINANCE• INS. AIO REAL ESTATE 479. no. 12. IN6. 223. 1mvicEs on, 1601. 31. 2207. 343. a1iER1/�NT 0. 0. IOTAL 1657• $716. N. VIAL N7, 0. TOTAL 1MIOS 11000 s) �WIMTll1E• Ro s"'I'. FISHING 10.• 0. M.• 102.E AKICILTOUL SERVICES AS. 76. /7• 130. •90. MINrNG 10. 23. _. 34. 10. CdiS11IUCT10H 1724. 24". 06. 4270. N2. I1MI�ACTIIUING tm. aa2 1RAlISIONTATION AND UTILITIES 1331, 5732. 02. 7145, 641._ IIIOCESw "AM i1a. 2437. 30. 3010. 367. ItTAtG Tlil►OE 3471. 5063. 2". 0703. 1740. 11iMNCE, INS. 00 FOAL ESTATE 9032. 32574. 342. 32040. M13. _ IOCES 134Sa. 30651. n0. 1l21S. 7st. .; 495• loa0. 2S. 19". 252. �s "TAI' 3"". 74410. 17M. 1O"". 1" 4. C. OF o1TAT (low S) 'Wwx �AsIICL,T111E, FISHING 02.E 307.• 0.• 300.E no.• .FIRISTIIr. #*Ici4,T111AL mvictS 131. 320. 499 3". 145. r111i111 • . '. so. Is i. d1!EIRIRTION 7012. tt130. no. 10;70. 440t. iMMIIACTIAIU0 7H0. 2S7o1. 12l. no,)$ "If. •:. 1dPOTAT10N 00 UTILITIES 4f0i2. I7aH. 249. 217%. 10'i6. M�tEfALE'` In?,40N. 00. iS2i. 751. �tAlf,' T#A "As. 115670 no. 20 o 400). /IIIAtt! . "IS. 00 MAX ESTATE 43415. 0 072. l40J•. 143502. 2w, _ . >IE1fvIt MS. i2703. 1l10. n000. 14147. K i11). 1440. 30. 2000. 3". ' �A tOTAL. .. 100703. 23432l. 4NI., 330011. 36332. . • • • . • • s �` 51,E 1 f I>p O. W AMD 1100E S) � Afir ORICaTme (lots . FISHING ai. 153. 0. 100. 135. AVICILTWn SERVICES 7S. 12+6. 20. 220. 03. MINING ` 23. $2. 4. C01�IR=ION loll. 2723. 10s. 4742. 1077, s ;^ NAM;R'L'T111 .AIwo 20ii. "43. 47. 1 2070. h I�QiI ATIOw 00 UTILITIES 2717. 11007. Ill. 14"s- 1342. "afsAd 90= 053. 33N. ss. 4iO4. 910. IVAIL TRAOE 400, "N. 210. t0211♦ 20i1.. F*Ia, INS. Arta AL ESTATE RE 21i07. 40,513. 747. 71VS7. - NOVICES Is"?. 431i1. 1m i32"* 10►3S. . r weN7 46". 1110. 2S. ' 1. 703 Fit : fiTAI. "no. tia 123. VASE 164140. .* II *&I WAV*VrA "y Mt *061 *4 # fN11NYifts. ", ,; '. : }P 17 { r r; 1 ... w a': . k • `. - ., TABLE 6 e 'EIMMNENT 04PLO1f1RNT IMPACTS tALTV"TE 21 i A. IMLl11IRMT S0. FLA. 1ALM OWNW OACE Nf3it(4 11EGloN RAC" ; AGu1CtLTw. FORESTItT. FISHING 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. AMICULT01AL SERVICES 4. •. 1. tt. �. MINING t. t. 0. Cp1STItU>ZT I Ott M. 134. IM1liJFACTiltING ol. 207. 1. 250e. N. TUMH3IORTATION ADO UTILITIES s0. 2s2. 2. �w �. o 24. ' Oft[" "AD[ 32. 130. t. 163• t0. XTA IL TRACE 332. 926. 20. one 179. FIHAM;E. Iltf. 00 HEAL ESTATE $no 1110. 13. 1461. 253. 5' St1tYICt3 73i. 17N. 33. 25". 3w. - ` oolo+tt«c�T o. o. o1 TOTAL 107. 4165. 78. &to0." 971. s Al • • • • • • h TOTAL YAMS 11000 $1 AwICUL intro AOPtISTIIT. FISHING 22. 72. 0.. 9A.. 211. Awl"TWII IPVICES !1. Is. 10. 1". is: MIRING 11• 36. 2. 30. 20. EptSTtsU1CT1oR 1 27s3. to, 4me 11040 a ~AMINO 13P. "a. `no s1N11 • EPA. VA14PORTATION NO UTILITIES 117l. i3is. 1)1. 704. 7120 IItOLESAUE atAo[ To. 2m. 4s. 3s11, 4201, NAIL VANWoo. %No 274. 9717. 1139. in. AIO AM [VAT[ 11241. 23S4s. W. s7t T7. 9m. SlRVtCts 1491119. 30111. loll. S0M. G30G. Mo 1172. 2G. 1710. 2V TOTAL36211. G3344. iMIO. 121l4s. /�Ms. } C. U" or oUMT ll000 SN •Aw1CItiLTM[. FOKSTRT. FISHING 102. ib.� o.' "S ' IV& AwICULTUOAL SERVICES 146. 366. Ss. M7. 1f2. # MIMiNG 42. M. 7. 11l. n. _ Cops"t=loN on. 12i70. N!. 320". no. 1MNIIACT{AIIG NG2. 271Qo. t3l. 3ry71A. sM4. 1111 ATTO0O iTILITIES 11�N. 2". 34263. 2177. 0 1m. $724. No 72s11. Ms. (. . RTAIL VAN W". 12Gt3. no., 22242. 142t. F IMAIEE • "IS. AND NAL [STAR IM06. 113200. 1719. 144721, 3MN0, UlkwCSS 3047• 41011010. 30U. 1021so. 116087. Mls. 1416* 34. VMS. 30. TOTAL 113M. molt. 34". ml 16, 64". 0. WU11 AWED (1000 11 ovicULTm, frams"'f, FISHING 91. 1". 0. 221. Wt. t A01CATU/ML SERVICES W. 141. 31. Mo 13. MyIM.I•M�fi no 4. s '., .. UI«X10N - - 217,• 310i• 12O• t�--'0'9a. i.a p4sy�. 1ii r• .... :i 1MMIfACTUwI1G 32s�. 10471. st. l3TGt, 32110. On- i' .. WMIS O"ATION 00 UTILITIES 3102. 133". 190. I"AT. 114W. i . 11�LtSALE Nt. 3rf4. t3. Mo IRTA m WAGE 147A. 0529. 320. 1 t 321. 3m. #NOAM, 00. 00 REAL ESTATE 24967. $6744. NO. 019711. in"M SS1tVtC1S 30"). "Its. 1419. 7017. it427 att""PT 957. 11321. 21. lot. no: 1 "TAL owl. 14311081 3047. amil4. 39"50 . ""I mokit4 r" "t w1II Ir'a* 4o hWaln6 irk. So pim I S1'IUfC t N TAM 7 PUMAWO Ofteum By SECTM CALM IF 11 "Olosele Natoli No-dectwIsm Tromy2EIstion Trado Tredw FIRE Swvkws Gavermamt Total 1 204 316 64 99 leo 1,919 4,(rA 11 144 too 47 too 96 1.003 1.917 710 TOTAL 426 131 207 1136 2,9101 9o9" 11627 1201441 TAM a PDAMW DROWM By SECTOR CALTUMN 21 ft,*" OWN"Is %fall ft"N"Nefleft mwmtscftwlsg kmmw-foflon To -a" Trade FIRE uwvlcn Total Sol 332 82 116 779 2,074 4,0" 9" 8,6" LqA 10-0 417 too to"? 1-917 718 3."0 TOTAL 451 40 224 1134 3'306 9,9" 1,627 MAM AM -:4 ,x A �x ,7 A 3. Fiscal Impact Using.1984 millage rates and his+oric average expenditures, Al+erna+es 1 and 2 would have a posi+ive fiscal Impac+ of $3.2 million on +he Cl+y of Miami, $2.3 million for Dade Coun+y, $2.4 million for +he school dis+rlc+, and $0.2 million for +he Meter Menagemen+ Dis+ric+ and special dls+rle+s combined, for a t` posl+ive regional impact of $8.1 million (Tables 9 and 10). C. PUBLIC FACILITIES 1, 010ar Was+ewa+er, and Solid Was+e Table 11 summarizes +he projec+l s 1elpec+ on water, was+ewa+er, end solid was+e. TABLE 11 NATO, WASTEMATER, AND SOLID WASTE Avallabl♦ COWI+y l Ic Fee i i l+r Avo►fos %!ft htk Ow!and Intl Sour« w+K 419,000 WO 110379000 tiro ros - NASA ;. Ihfteee+K 41 a,000 0P0 1, 0379000 wo Yes - NASA Sollo Wes+*§ 42 TPD or Yea • Prlva+e 149 Cubic Yarns per cloy 010 - gallons per pay. s TP+D - +on$ per coy a Total Denana SOUR s AM 20 L t i 3a yuyj �i°'' d'_ ..:#: ...." �. .h : . .. ^v:!. 4?},. • " .. i. >,. .,f , �2��'fit."11."y4�s��F''tA�x'�u:�S,.segf3Y."-ite.bslihuag _ —_— CITY MIAl11 rl COEINTX tiMIE . - I : ` SprCIAL DisTR1Ct lFMMII/Lle R . SCHOM DISTRICT OAtIE rXPE OF t11:NMa11"WW NINE0 TYPE 11F DIMMING MIT StNKE-FANiL11 "MTV-FA"ILV MOILE-09M TOTAL' N11HER OF UNITS $so O 0 130 llaPO" OF STUKHTS PUt MIT 0.00 0.00 0.00 MJ"Kft OF PERK ►" MIT 2.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL 1RROM OF STt10EMS O. Ir y ' RI;eTtIEliT Pi1N4A 1lt ifM 700. TWAL PWO F*4NLWL REAPS MS • 5551700, • 4695612. • 343M. • 2394711. • 13185716. � - 11rt mwt'l,i1 s i arriCiT i • 3^.11: M. '• ::34361. • ?07:65. • .394711. • Ra47626. .-.-.__...- ... ... .-: .. L.:..�,.W.5,�...�w.+.�ti,�.-.{-.«a1!%Yt,:..�._txa..�.............e�`.=.�,d.J...�t—.... ...;......rx.... l..r... .<.,a-.ti .. r ....,- ., i .... ... ...s,,..e �.. ... ... .. .. __ e..< ..,w .,... _.. �..i ... ... .. �..._ ai,� ,�:.( i �, - •. r .:' r. � ..:.-..: _ 1 TABLE 10 s' fISCAI IMPACT (ALTERNATE 21 r NAME OF OE'VELOPPMW MTAMt CENTER I AMENDED NJO P ICE NO TAX19*0 ' . LOCATION z CITY MIAM1 CtiQIN�TY OAOE F; 3F•FCIAL DISTRICT lFMlb/L/• SCHOM DISTRICT OAOE TYPE OF DEtiELOPNIENT 140PIMINNY IAt TYPE OF DWELLING UNIT 1lLLT[-FAN[LY I1001LE-IOE TOTAL MINER OF UNITS O O O 0 " 1NtJM " OF STUDENTS PER tN!t 0.00. 0.00 0.00 ; NGISER OF PERSONS PER UNIT 0.00 0.00. 0.00 ,_. TOTAL NllNOER OF STUDEN1T11 0. RESIDENT POPLR.AT I ON O. , .. NrJN10ER OF EMPLOYEES 12144. PROPERTY VALUE 3=734336. ANIRLYSES CONDUCTED USING AVERAGE COEFFICIENT! CITY COLMTV SPOEC[AL DISTRICT SCHOOL. DISTRICT TOTAL _ r • ONE-TIME REVENUES • i379N. • 0. • 3051••. E • 0. • 9�3090. TOTAL NEW ANNUAL EXFENOITURFS • 2254912. • 2329§"- • SIstAI. • O. • •9oS6.2. `..,� TOTAL, "m ANMLN%L REVEl"s • 54W232. • 4'&" 32. • 329a14. • :39T711. • 1?Mr0A3b. f � S�FitsN DFptC1T ! 3^::73.0'0 2"r4103. • 7I039." • 2394711.NT • 1Mi9MIlb. Y 2. Police and Fire z Police service is.provided to the development area from the City of Miammi Police Department on NW 2nd Avenue. Average police emergency response time In is 3 to 5 minutes; average routine police reponse is 30 minutes. The applicant indicates M7' the project will include an on -site security system combining personnel and electronic surveillance and emergency response including uniformed and plain clothes security guards. In addition, access to building will be electronically controlled. City of Miami Fire Department will provide fire service to the, project from Station #1 on WE 5th Street, with a response time of under four minutes. The station is equiped with two engine companies, one aertrl company, and one rescue company, and an { on -duty staff of 18 persons. City of Miami Fire Department Is also available for emergency medical service. Randle Eastern Ambulance Service wlII provide emergency medical service to Miami Center I as part of their contract with the City of Miami. Response times for downtown Miami currently average 8 to 10 minutes. tt' The city is presently developing an impact fee ordinace to be imposed at building permit assurance, calculated based upon costs of necessary additional facilltes needed to support 23 TIE.. - ^�i �t •.. F t •' � .. �, ._ai t is y .'e tyi additional development in excess of the+ planned fors j proportionate to excess development. The fire depar+mient has indicated +het this.project may be subject +o the fee. 3. End The Applicant proposes to use electricity as the primary fuel source, supported by a diesel fuel operated emergency generator. The total energy consumption o+ project but Idout is estimated to be 336.4 billion BTU's. or 96.6 million kilowatt #z hours. This is equivalent to the energy content of 2.2 million r gallons of fuel all. Since this Is electrical energy, three f t.lmos this amount of energy (6.7 million gallons of fuel oil) a` must be consumed at the power plant to provide this energy to tr. the site. h Because miarginal costs ere higher then average costs and the m�erglnel oasts for new facilities are higher then-+." average costs of existing facilities, +he cost of providing additional �? electricity to regional users wilt be significantly higher than the typical costs +odry. However. +he new cus+omers +he+ weed added generation capacity do no+ pay the true marginal costs. for +he added capacity. Indeed. +he average cost +o all constm ors . Increases to cover the marginal cost of serving new customers. 24 �e••�• •••� �.a.riM•..vr iv. •irYA, r i 07 fill riff iiiryi ®ai we Pi i electricity users in the Region to reduce the energy consumption and increase the energy efficiency of users In the Region as a way to retard the increase in average energy costs. One way this can be done is to require all new construction, large or $mail, to meet adequate energy efficiency standards. ,The inclusion of the energy conservation measures I fisted in Conditlon i1 will reduce the project's energy use and assist in avoiding adverse regional energy impact. D. TRANSPORTATION Introduction In previously reviewed applications for development approval in the DuPont Plaza area (Ball Point, Miami World Trade Center (CenTrust),, Southeest Bank Financial Center, and the now expired Miami Center' 1i), t°ransportetion assumptions depended on a three point system consisting of: 1) the Downtown People lbver System, 2) an improveo street surface system, and 3) the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated ramp system +0 access 1-95. As was mentioned in these previous reviews, the success of the downtown transportation system (as well is the ultimate viability of any developments in the Dupont Plaza 25 . s g ALx _ s q?m 7� i i r •' iy } epee) depends on all three points of the system being operational f' prior to full buildout of the area. Prior to July i962, in.the ' absence of an adopted fair share transportation policy the+ could effectively analyze and address an Applicant's impacts on these #. ' improvements, Council requested the+ developers In +he Dupont Plaza 1, area arrange "fron+-end" loans for the bifurcated ramp system in : order to assist in timely development of needed infrastructure. As r, buildout of this area is fast approaching, it seems not only prudent r, but necessary to mention these needed facilities again. { t three arts system are resent) on-line, or are Two parts of he p ys presently coming on-line in the near future, those being a version of the Downtown People Wver System and major surface street improvements. The third leg of this system, the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated T` i Ramp system, still remains in the planning stages. ' As has also been noted in previous Applice+ion for.Develgmsnt Approval reviews, the Ball Point development was reviewed during the } long process +o assess and plan for +he future transportation system In the Dupont Plaza area. As a result of this timing problem and in y an effort to assist in the timely development of the Ball Point property, it was agreed that the transportation impacts generated by ` 13e11 Point would be addressed in +he Miami Center 11 application. These impacts were addressed In the submfitted Miami Center 11 application and also in the Issued Miami Center 11 Development �4 Z; 26 N, :" kl"_ .. to !i _— e Order. As the Miami Center 11 DO has now expiredt and the current : Miami Center project will create many of the impacts of the expired appl icetiont the impacts of the Miami Center 1 development have boon kE addressed in +his review. 1. Exis+ino Traffic r a t The projec+ traffic impact. area is bounded by I-395 on t:>te h* " north. SE 15th Road a1 the south, 1-95 on t:1e west, and rr Biscayne Say a1 the east (Figure 4). Five roadway s"mtnts'on 4 ' five different roadways currently operate below LOS roadway segments and t4a i r respective levels of, sere ice are A shown in Table 12. y u TABU 12 ENISTIN IRWIC CONDITIOiIS `. i.. From T$ 2., W 1211 j? ist 'tleAYe NE 9tn Street W 10th Street s E - . NE :2eod AvenueNE 111h street NE 1201 street . 3 : E ow Wow i Ate+Que 13th Street SE 10th Street 2 F !M bw Avenue River of fop ti So a" Strout Sw 2d Avenue SW 3rd Avenue 3 E SCUM = AAA 27 , p J gg t � p} WE, m QN7 2. Future Packground Traffic impects a. Programmed Improvemen� +s Approximately 1105 million in roadway improvements are programmes within the traffic impact area, the most significant of these improvements include 1) the four downtown distributor Improvements, 2) the Brlckeil Avenue bridge over the Miami River. and 3) the SW 2nd Avenue bridge over the Miami River. Each needed improvement's description. year of construction, cost, and applicant s ' fair share is shown in Table 13. #(' b. Background Traffic Projections Y n t Background traffic growth throughout the impact area was r -'protected at -2.41, compounded annually,, based on the qF average decrease in traffic volumes to the area curing the s. past five years. Projections were mace for 19%. No edditionat road segments would operate.below LOS "0" with the addition of 1994 background +raffie. :z } : 3. Comlfted Oevelo ant Treffic Twentytw0 committed deveI*;ments were ident i f iad in the troffto impact area. The names, location, use, and scele of those developments are listed in Table id. The bdditton of comm I++ad oevelopm►ent traffic to the 1994 programmed network results in no additional roan segment operating below LOS "0". 29 _- •l �1 •: Tim Is fir' lRbf B 0A1f mTATION IIp1MUElE11TS tbN f strYeUos 'ralr Share 1St,0001' Psojset SfwttO Tree of khrk If1,000)'. 7aar Eslstl Proposal _ Total —~ Domlora 91strlbuter 1-� fa $lse. Blvd. ftsjor 1*prsda 3a,f00 A7-OB' 3.751' S,0Q7 A,7ri 02 0 Dorstown 0lsfrlwA*- RI,At of Way 20,300 a! -!Id OZ 02 0= Dowwtow Distributor Wool Ave. to SE t Ave. Ibjer uprsde ?.?10 d3-l16 O= 02 02 Doretow Distributor 0**I* Plate Srrface Sir@" Iwovw mts 1,fR1 89-116 ` Grichell Bridge Over Nae1 River S-1e., 1IWR- Ns met 0= fort of INarl Brldpe Ocadpo is to B1sc. Blvd. !-le. blob bvel_ 9,1l0 Bs-Bi Os Os Os Part of Waal Bridge Osdpe le a Blse. Blvd. 6-1119 btpb local MIN" ON7 r* !It A+d Awcasfs Bridge Over Mal River Rerlacee%Idw NAM 0: 02 • TOTAL IO3,?7i 1,0?S 1 Sea Part Ill - 1/24A6 letter fraw I=. A felt where Is not caressed for proprawd laprovwslets fated to the cprroot fiscal year. s Ile *rojaCt traffic "519Md to thls II#*. S0AMI Am, Swc , : �x 5� yf T`G ✓ < :. .......... .. .:'- .:... .:. ... ... .... _. ::.. ... .. ....-.., ry .. .. .r ..r .. i" x l . 3 i i .. fit TABLE. 14 MAJOR COWITTM OEVELOPMWS Scale ;i LOe�t ton Use (OFA, SIV Off lee Tower BriekelI Ave i Office ISO.= SE 11th Street srlekoll Bay South Bayshore i Offlee 31fi.000 I Of f Ica Tower SE ilth Street Brlckell Key Cisuphton Island Residential/ F 300 OU/ Phase I office 16.000 Brickell Key Ctmghtdn island Residential 334 OU Phase 11 Brickelt Key Clv4hton Island Residential 410 011 sY Phase III 1221 Brlekell Brlckell Avenue i Office/ 410.000/ 5 SE 12tn Street Retail 10,000 y One BrlekslI Brlekell Avenue i Office/ 443.0001 � Saws SE Oth WOO Retail 12.000 t Two 9rickel l Brlckell Avenue & Office/ u31000/ ; Tower SE 8% Street Retail. 12.000 v Lincoln To+ers Brlekell Avenue i Office/ 737.1100/ K 7th Street Retell 12,000 Brlekell Station Sr Ist Avenue i Office/ 280.000/ Tows S>r Oth Street Wall 18.000 ` $outhewt Financial Biscayne Blvd. b office/ 111900000/ Center SE 2nd Street Retail 16.ODO Rlverpare "I SE I Avenue i *"I in Suites SE 4th Street Ul+raw+ IrII SE 1st Avenue i Retail 93.000 SE 1st Street f' I16tre-0ade Admin. Ml 2nd Avenue i %Vt. Office/ GOO'"/ Building NO 2nd Street Rots 11 40.000 ,L Centrust Tower SE Ist Avenue i Of f lee/ 549.000/ K 2m Street Metal 26.900 weew Hauer least 2hd Avenue i Office/ 262,000/ least Fiegfer St. Plano fi.000 "%old* SWI0itr iayfranrt hark i Spec. Ratelf 234,a00 W 4th Street City AdMlnlsfretlon NM 2nd Avenue it ' oovt. Off tee 3181400 = Building II lif 3rd Street fiorlde l4 lonol Bail bwf Avenue b Govt. Office 169,000' _. Service master 11 NW Sth Street Freso" Tower Plus Biscayne Blvd. i Mixed Use '4 ME 6" Street g ,- t to+ltneast Overfemn/ W 2W Avenue i Cka wclol/ 2f0.000/ Park ties+ Ml 9th Street Residential 1000 DU ' 4 f F�=' caarthSware ouse MI Ist Avenue itOffice/ 231�Og0/ W 2P4 Street Retail 15.000 �,,fltAfCE: AOA LL Yz t t_ 4 .. 4 4. Project Traffic impects s. Trip Generation Project traffic was projected based on trip generation Was derived from +tie "1-95 Downtown Distributor• Design Traffic Forecasts." According to the report. the trip generation Was were standard ITE rates with adjustments made to reflect trip making in the urban setting at Xi Y various times of day. These trip generation Was are shown in Table 15. , TAM 1s UIP 00 GENERATION RAVES t TiM of M offIto, ... 1000 S.F. WA 3.367 3.146 17:34 , ' RM6t 1: 1000 S.F. ilsA 6.330 9.000 09.94 ', MONI Poow LOS 1.567 20.40 txnle. 1600 S.F. WA 3.725 9.125 50.00 Condo/ 0.626 1.062 12.42 Apt. Uhit - b. P_rolect T�rs_f_f lc. Projectlons The addition of 1994 project traffic to +fie programmed f roadway network would result in no additlonal roadway seVwrtlts f a I ! i ng be 1 ow L05 "D" . i t shout* be noted however, that the projectes traffic assignments as well as 1994 roadway levels of service are substantially based on 32 - > j j. gR$f'tYl gg - .vu..:..ry i-PX . ..<.:L're .�.�.H-.. �;iv. {.',Y,Y $•' '[ fi � .fv.r 'F.*1 :' - ... Y >k kity�Ss _- . - , _— ......._1..__s'.:. _d.,_:•. . ,�: ..,. -.. .. ,...:3.r,a?s...<�'�'. x;`.'�r.�eK..::rau?r.�ath..h3.FW A. el.,...-..+ic..i., ,., #..,x �,c+:..s.:=.._ r loess transit (as previously discussed) as well as a modified version of the programmed Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp system. This modified design is discussed in greater detail in Section 3, Additional Improvements Needed. Teble i6 shows the Cu+iulative effects of 1994 background, committed development, and project traffic on Y. the programmed and modified road network. end Tables 17 and IS show the levels of service on roadway segments for each of these lmpocts. h TABLE 16 CtMt1ATIW TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS Selranta Pro.16000 +o operate salow LOS 000 113 Total) MWOMW Iwpaets Naber of Sagwlis Parc"+ of To+al Y . sxistlao la+vwk ! 36 1"4 Background 0 0 1981 Background and a 31 Colorit+e0 Owe)optueM 19M Background, Llonol"ed 1 31 and Ex 1 st l lug 101801 Cant*r - Traffic 1!M 'Ncryrouu+o. Oe.wltte0 31 am Prowsw Miami Center Trattie BoulcEt AOA, SiRPC ' �. Add 1+tons V Improvements Needed to Accomiadet* Project low is Major porflons of the transportation plan designed to offset the anticipated Impacts and traffic floras of this entire Miami Center project are based an modifications to 1`DOT's current design of +he Downtown Di st r ib0or Sysft m Of furc0od Romps. As these ioprovpments have yet to be approved by t:+le Florida r. 33 , �_ }-t : t �y,,i ,+,- ..: -#�.�: n.a_.�,x.-!::_ LI }_—cz.!•�E�i� k.353-- _�— : : r .r . � d n,: I .J .1P•1►i YPdI PhlPL lE10.. 1 !!y .45 NI .. <. ,. .... , ., nK .. ,.... .. -. _. � .. ... :"... _.. .-...-.., .: n, 1 . n �, i .. U t i.-..:_. _. `.: "„ _ , �. •_;:.,. , ,. CLK&AT, l%f 199t':PEAK IfWR 1RAFrIC AN 19" . 1914 19le 19M Miami Center ` EKlsting BKkgrorAd Carwltted Existing Pr from Olreetlon Lenes LOS 1.05 LOS LOS LEIS' Blstetne llfvd. NF Nh Streiet RE nith $treet N .: �. A` A` A A A S ! C A C C C NE Ist Avenue III of 911% Street NE loth Street If ! A A A A A ,. 119 Znd'Av~ t1D. ME list Street NE 12th Street S S E C F F F fi Sl1 let`Street 121 Sw Ist Anne Miami Avenue E 3 C S C C C SE ?ad Street SE Ist Avenue Nll Avenue Miami 2 A A A A t94 str lb�rtor SE 2nd Avenue full Karp " E 1 C A A A A - to a !D Entrance Beep M 2 A A A A A Orickell Avenue SE Oth Street SE loth Street N 2 F C E E E A S 2 A A A A Brickelf Avenue River Orldge N 2 0 A A A B A 8?+! S 2 C A !! > 51P 2+d Avenue tiD River Bridge''' N 1 F e 0 0 A 0 A S 1 C. A A Miami Avenue River Bridge N ! N/A A A A A A A S ! A A ` SW Intl Street S11 2W Avenue Sif Srd AN E 3 E S F F F r SE 8% Street SE Ist Avenue Brletrll E 4 A A A A A SE ?tie Street orlewl" Wool Menus If 2 A A A A A 49tAlle ABA. SIqC p' �t ,_ .. .._.. - .. a .. .: ......... ,.. ,.. ._.... ... .. , r ,. ., �. ,.. _. ....:,. .... _ .., .. • , .- ,...., ,r. ':� ,. i -. ..._ :.. _ ...� ....:. ... , ...,� .. - --.:- .v. •_.,r t . , . .it1 .t '. d: i Ar it t •.. «+l -,_...,..,r�•.�k:..,..�x.t�«:r�„a+�'.,wn:Lsuue i r I iiifYl {Ihlll Mhk � (�`' ��� h.r �SH'�"1F3'7y �..'A6rM+n"wi`,..wry. �"N'w.'Ne ".rw'•!"P`T'Si'C"'t"�""i.+ .,.,X _ _ (S�auS TABLE 1B CIINLATIW H94 PEAK NOW 1RWFIC PM Im 104 19" 19" MIMI dstsor fulsting Background C1s1•ritted Yxistt From To olrectlas Lass LOS UK LOS LOS LOS BIWAMM Blvd. ME ath Street ME ith Street N 4 A A R R B S 3 B A C C C HE Ist ArenmE (I V NE 9% Street ME 10th Street N 3 E C F F f - ME 2hd Avenue III ME list Street NE 12% Street S 3 A A A A A Sli 1st Street (2) Sit 1st Avenue Mimi Avenue E 3 C N 0 0 0 SE 2hd Street SE 1st Aveuwrs Mial Avenue M 2 B A B B S OIstr1hatw SE 2W Arom En It Reel E 4 A A A A A f 94 Il S i Entrance Rain M 2 B A A A A i. OrlckelI Avenue SE 13th Street SE IOM Street M 2 A A A A A f S 2 E B 0 0 0 { orlckelI Arnie River Bridge N 2 C A B C C S 2 C A A A B i Sit 2hd Armus 131 River Bridge N 1 A A A A S I A A C C 0 I. MIMI Avenue River Bridge N 3 MIA A A A A S 3 A A A A SO a" Streert Sit 2hd Arenas Sig 3rd Aresw E S A A A A A SE ith Street SE lot Avenue orIclof1 E 4 A A A A A SE 7th Stroot orlchalI MIMI Avenue M 2 C A • S e SD1=$ AN, SPlNrC -' s ,:.,. -. '. - .. :: ._.... ..J'. . [,... .. ...-:.nc.. .:. -N .. .J.✓ .-: •( .' ... 1. l.y , '✓1 w.� .:_.:�,......_:. ...-.. _.... .. :'.._....._...-.;_.,..._,.,_...K.�'i�,._.u.,'_c�s.a#rcn'.6�,t`�rt�...�7>�+fi+..•!h.'�,a,.�....''�....G:a'�s._,.*t.._..:.s..'�.y..�s''.�._.F�...�'u,F„�;%��,"`�_-.�5,c,..�.,a^�;a`S'�._,,.::vEx,__,�-u-.....w.;,��..u.._,4�_....�:�..,..,,..... #�..... -.1 _,,.. _._s....,._._,.?_. ..- -t Planned and programed transportation improvement, then many Of the traffic assignments and projected 1994 levels of service for roadway segments In the impact area will not hold true. The im rovement d i ed b th Du t Pi t k f 0 p s as scuss y e pon aza as orce . are shown in Table 19. In addition to these Improvements, the Applicant proposes: (1) eonve�sion of a portion of the eastbound bifurcated ramp from embankment and retaining wall to additional structure length to allow passenger car and van clearance for access to the local service roadway, (2) +he Biscayne Boulevard May south side service road, and (3) minor gsometr ie improvements at the SE 2nd Avenue and Bi s ea .a Boulevard May intersection. No extension to the eastbound bifurcated ramp is proposed. The proposed modifications are shown in Figure g. Table 20 lists the effects of the project aid improvements on critical lntersocttons within the traffic 36 i :1 i s 44 :r7 , TALE 19 OWIFICATIONS TO TIE pOMWOMN 013"'0" 91FUCATED 1lAllfS (As Olscusd by the OupeM Plan Teak fOrg1 aa r;' 1. Adatttonel atruetura . IlatalnIng into eeetlOn (330' - M e ) x 30' rz. Indepandant retolning get strueture for connector f0 SE 3r0 AvA. x 219 x 401 Increment V1 4. Ile'aonstruetlon of additional lam on SE Srd St. batwah SE 2nd Ave. }i Shoo K 3rd Ave. i 39ov x 121/' rowlstrSetion 350' x 2 curb a+o guitar ,. .. S. TrNfte siphals at SE 3rdAvo./Blacsyea Blvd. ray ate at Soutnaast . financial Center Serape ;v - beteseh 91sc4rw Bjvo. 6. AddNlenal Natures and vidaning SE 3rd Ave. May and SE lord St. per 220' x 33'/9 (Incl. raised traffic seatlon) •Slagle oonatruetla+ adjacent to Oupont flaw 490' A, sldN A. B. More am pow signing. Signallsatlon. and marklhgs C. Ibre toomplex walntenance of traffic ADAqq1 TALE 20 LE%Ls OF SERVICE WIT" FIIOSECT TIlA:FIC AND II0R0IEMENTs t{. -With Project Mitlqut _'*o,►nct T with te�oyeows ritnou! lrpro�r�ents - t.. I."Olon 3ed Avenue / S$ 2m4 Street ® A K 3rd Overawe S SE 2nd Street C A A,'' 2hd 3tr4at i SE Flnohclsl Canter C A } Blscee tivd. Q SE 2hd Street C A yn ii Biscayne Olvd. a Chooln Poole A Biscayne Blvd. a SE 3rd Street B A H: '1E Biscelw Blvd. a so. Olvie, C Canter 1 Corsge -a Si 3rd Oaenye S Blaceyne Blvd. Way B 0 �b�i 2 Avenue t Biaeryne Blvd. Nov O Q. 1, St aped iwanue i 145 Distribution C B }a ftPV , It lwehus SE 3rd S• 'twt C C j eADA 37 t 777777, � s The additional costs for the ramp alteration is that of extending the +vo-lane structure approximately fifty feet. I t:> This cost Would be partially offset by eliminating the need for programmed optics signalizetion and a anodes+ reduction In right of Way requirements along Biscayne Boulevard May for the combined snap and surface street roadways. Incidental addltional costs would be involved in the ramp terminus x +reatment near Biscayne Boulevard. Excluding righ+-of-way, the net difference in construction cost is approximately S80,000. _ The additional cost for construction of a separate south side service roadway along Biscayne Boulevard would, in part, be offset by reducing the number of required through lanes on Biscayne Boulevard May from three to two. More curb and gutter, drainage structures, and pavemen+ are needed with this alteration than was enticlpated with the OpA staff proposal. Although sidewalk wes not shown on the south side of Biscayne Boulevard May in +he MA staff proposal, the Dupont Plaza Task Forte has indicated +hat I+ would be desirable, and I+ probably would have been included in a finalized DDA plan. Sidewalk is x' included In this proposal. The net difference in construction cost between +he plans (to gain a south side service road and #re* flow movem ants frown +ha oastbound remp and the throug.4 t', 'laws on Biscayne Boulevard May) is approxImeteiy $3$9000 r:a 39 SKI i; NT F -'Trio minor geometric revision at the SE 2nd Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard May intersection to provide channeliaation, a better radius return, and resulting in improved traffic flow, should odd no more than S3,000 additional to the roadway proposal prepared for the Downtown Development Authority staff. Table 21 lists the three Applicant proposed improvements needed - to accommodate project impacts, their cost and the Applicant's fair share. TMLt 21 y. AWITIOWL iWRCVPW 1TS TOM 00111100 DIS1RMSuf011 /IRu1CA= RAID STSTP MMO To ACCOMMA11 PROACT IW%M An# fee" 7 MR►w On1 FRI_�: ft"We1M Of IMP 1 seem S 50.000 SAw ip RAAO SS.000. SS.000 .,. 1.. OA�A�tte AR �.2+a �3��000 � �,. •' ,a. 04 61WA" live. My_ _ '� IAhtAANIM TOTAL S)l�.0p0 St3�.000, . .. A • Consideration of the timing of needed Improvements to the t. 4 exi'sting roadway network is-compi Icated. In this Instance dui. fv ° _two factors. The first reiatos to the design of the programmed Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp system. While the Flori4a_ Department of Transportation has been proceeding with a final . ;. design, the FOOT design (see Figure 6) does no+:Ipclude the _ - 40 — + r YI YiPi`r��<, -,. .. .- . -- ' . ;' ,_� '. :' -- . , .,. _- .. r d i _. ,i -a., i ,. ;.L .,...w .e_,.,.i i...k•w�,�:P=x . _— __ DISJ "BUTOR BRMATM RAMP SYSTBll lit wLAZA _ I! 1 U1 d'a wto i w. qi t r , modifications discussed by the Dupont Plaza task force or those contained In the Applicant's proposed design. The second relates to the timing of the ramp construction. Originally, the project was scheduled for the current fiscal year. Due to federal cutbacks and other circumstances FDOT now projects the Completion for 1988. However, It remains uncertain whether the timing of the completion of the ramps will be coincident with the Applicant's proposed project phasing. Under normal circumstances, encountering a situation such as this one would result in a recommendation for project denial and staff would s` have requested the+ the Applicant voluntarily delay Council's consideration pending resolution of these major problems. However, working with the City, FOOT and the developer three things are apparent: 1) that most of these problems can be t resolved in the near future; 2) the project is economically fmportant to the region; and 3) the developer's time is Co"Orained regarding project financing. Therefore, stbff has ` - is agreed, a+ the Applicants request, to address approval of Interim -phasing of the proposed project independent of design or coincidence with the Bifurcated Ramp system. In order to both accurately assess +he impacts caused by Interim phases of the project tin +he absence of +he bifurcated ramps) and to recommend'adequa+e mitlga+ion of +hose Impacts, the surface street network, along with the preliminary surface street ieprovesents suggested by +he City of Miami's Public Works . 42 1.6 11 Department, was examined for the year 1991. The year 1991 was chosen because it reflects the most probable year of occupancy for Phase 1. The examination was based on the following rs assumptions: 1) only one of the Applicant's two proposed structures would be constructed• 2) the Bifurcated Ramp system would not be in place, 3) some form of interim improvements to SE Second Avenue and project entrance areas would be undertaken { by the Developer, 4) no additional development in the 3 block f+ area directly west of the proposed project site would take place In the absence of the bifurcated ramps, and S) some form of intersection improvement would be performed along SE 2nd< Street. Unknowns in our analysis are the precise Interim ,t=r improvements needed to ensure adequate levels of service, priorti to the development and construction of the bifurcated ramp system. These particulars are still in the planning phases, and final improvements and costs rre to be.determined by the t.� City of Miami. However, these are primarily local roadways and. a prellminery iist of possible Ibproveno0s, as determined by the Cltyls Department of Public Works. includes: A. Dupont Plaza improvements 1. • SE 2nd Avenue and SE 3rd Street Adjust west curb oh public land on southbound approach and adjust traffic signal heads as required, t f- - through lanes. Lane drop to be easily accommodated south of Intersection within existing pavement f'. through left turn at Biscayne Boulevard May prior to }l. } i; Brickail Avenue bridge approach. Modify signing and striping throughout section as required. r 2. SE 2nd Avenue and SE 2nd Street Adjust channelizatton curbing in southeast corner to provide two westbound through lanes and three separate left turn'lanes, plus one free flow left turn lane inside modified channelization island. Two of the left turn lanes for access to 1-95 entrance ramp near SE 2nd Avenue and SE 3rd Street, one mandatory and one optional. Adjustment of channelizatlon island in southeast corner to also allow three southbound through lanes, trensitloned through intersection with skip guide lines. (On* mandatory right turn lane and two through lanes currently in place.) Revise signal head displays, pedestrian features, •overhead and other signing. and pavement markings as required. 44 } t t � � # . - _ '.1 _ 7f S"eYpjA f t C , i 7 "_ .) !.- .1.xyNy i ;•q ''Y' _1 . b t� i`iy' E t. Biscayne Plaza Project Entrance i Entrance and exit drives to be coordinated with 'r3 �f Ultimate bifurcated ramp design and City of Miami Public Works'Qepartment. Geometric alterations at project drives near Biscayne Boulevard May and Biscayne Boulevard Kay. This is to Include revised drainage as necessary, outside pavement widening within existing right of waysY 4 signaliza+lon of exit drive to be installed warranted, and revised pavement markings. Also provide custom material and construction for Fz, approximately 1,200 feet of sides elks along project = street frontage and riverwalk frontage, and all seating, lighting, and landscaping, all for public ` i use. 4. 61scere Boulevard May Access Roadway City to preserve present public right of way for' separate 181 eastbound access roadway south of Biscayne Boulevard May to extend from SE 3rd Avenue .to Biscayne Plaza project south vehicular traffic entrance. Preserve+lon to extend at least to date of completion of project Phase 2. (Upwrate amass roadway not deemed necessary to project Ph"* 1.) 45 R, r i� �` z r rs-._+._...... 3.t �rm.3'.4 ..q !°..:,5'.x31.-�?s.�_ -: `"... f.-:. ._.v_.�e .—...1 _! ..... ...., .-.. .�f i*k§�'vs;gt4i�„_nna J�:i .�-�.,�`•� bo Surround In& Area Improvements (Outside Dug2n+ P I era) I. SE 2nd Street between South Miami Avenue and SE Is+ Avenue right of way wi+hin Ws block that Is necessary to create three wes+bound lanes, an addition of one travel lane. A+ +ht Miami Avenue Intersection, Ws Improvenen+ would allow a separate left +urn Ian*,, a separate through lanes and a separate lane used as combination through and slan+ right to +he 1-95 entrance ramp. 2. SE 2nd Street between SE Is+ Avenue and SE 2nd Avenue Poster roadway plan calls for three travel lanes constructed within existing public right of way. (Two +rev*[ lanes presenfly provided.) Tow projected levels of service for street segments In +he dowftvn area for 1991 will still operate below LOS "D" even vol+h +he proposed Interim project Impacts mw Jmprovenen+s. LQ$s currently experienced In +he area. What may be sore 46 Case, are the levels of service on intersections in the area as Shown is Table 22. Critical intersections in the immediate aroo will operate at an acceptable LOS with interim phasing of :the project, independent of the bifurcated ramps, provided that interim improvements are made to the surface street network. TOW 22 1M1 a1TICAL 1WRIPIN"ldlti Vlr0 T •ITUCAM RA,P STSTAI mtn 1~40 Meee e� '►eject WitPA ur Project or twevoente lowere""s leyreweAMts Cs Inte►eeetlM .. LOS ����..� U aw Ave. MO 2ne St. AN • ` A rz IS 3W Ave. ww 3rd St. CPIN C AM e o o w. fty `f Sm Ave. oW 2ne St. 010 f `Pill p kr r R $ra Ave. Me sre St. 3/0 Ave. Me ®teuyne AY • C t Al C C C live. iay r Mayne Blvd, OJert AY M/A • • OM M/A • • 0►Iri l , r ` UMI W, !RI C tz : t3. Parkl I The existing structure contains 1,15O'eovered parking spaces. The proposed additions to the project will provide 1 approximately 1,200 covered parking spaces. All will be locetad out of sight inside the building base on floors 3-10. Parking access will be via Internal floor ramps and a foul —lane t .47 {paa i f .. F ( '• cxst. e.. 'F 3�yft..-��34� building entry -exit drive connection to Biscayne Boulevard. The signalized access drive will be located at the northwest _ y'. corner of the project.slte and adjacent to the Ball Office parking garage. Parking control Mill be by both an electronic gets and a control booth, both of which Mill be located along the main entry -exit. r ~' - In addition, the project has the permanent right, throug4 the We purchase agreement, to long-term lease of up to 600 additional parking spaces on the remaining three -blocks of #x Dupont Plaza immedia+ely west of the site. With the addition of the 600 parking spaces Immediately west of the project, the ft t•.,,..,_ provision of parking should be adequate for both proposed and existing structures. l 7. Mass Transit }- A major component of the planned transportatlon system for the. f; Dupont Plaza area is a reliance on the, Downtown People.Mover system. The system is an enlarged loop the+ circles the antirs a" down4own area. The closes+ existing iPM s+ation is locates northwest of the existing ball Point development, as shown in 4.. Figure 7. The Applicant's traffic assumptions heavily rely not ;Y} only on significant translt ridership, but also on small percentages of grade level pedestrian traffic being generated ,ay{ by such ridership. Grade level pedestrian traffic needs to be c., . 48. l , mInlmlz*d in order to ensure that adequate levels of green time can be achieved for the surface street network. While second story pedestrian walkways Ins originally proposed in the area) would be preferable. internal walkways within the Miami Center area should be adequate to minimize the impact of grade level crossings. A not Y } S fT Y.; , z Lf: s - } -t'`�c•�' '^^r�`.'a+�$ �3& a< f' '_ - . i,� �-+ .- ;--'y.1+ '_x �d.�.�'x'?'.�:�54.^ _?�-�=_x3si�� d ! r p. ^L dU,,rt- -�;u. .�.v fi.-, -_ a we Gomm Govews" S �y. 1 } - ( 411a - lvt� ��- i r1;= Miami Regional Service Center 401'N.W. 2nd Avenue, Room 510 Miami, Florida 33128-1794 January 24. 1986 Ms. Ane Deister._ Interim Director tir South Florida Regional Planning Council 3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 140 Hollywood, Florida 33021 } Dear It. Deister: 3 {' Re: Miami Center I ADA and . u` WPA.Item Nos. 6113307, 6113375. 6113376 State Job Nos. 87006-3503,-2507,-3505{ Downtown Distributor, Bifurcated'Ramps and Surface Streets At the'Meeting I attended on Wednesday, January 22, 1986 at your office regarding the transportation elements of the Miami Center I AppliCi#ion F' for Development Approval. a question was raised as to the status `of the construction schedule for the Downtown Distributor and Bifurcated Ramps.,r; Recently the Development Order for Miami Center II expired. That develop- want order included a provision for the donation of the rights -of -way needed to construct the Bifurcated Ramps section of the Downtown pistributor. It also included an exaction for certain local street improvements that are �t Imes coonents of the project design. The expiration of;the Miami' �1 Center`11 Development Order, and thus loss of the provision for right•of-way, has substantially changed the schedule and cost of the Bifurcated Ramps project • `. The current Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) shows that construction of this project is scheduled to begin this fiscal year. This will not occur The need to acquire the right-of-way has set the beginning of construction back at'least two fiscal years. At this tIA the Department is developing ; a plan for acquisition of the needed right-of-way. The annual update of , the Department's Five -Year Transportation Plan will show a financial plan y thilt commits the needed right-of-way funds in the current fiscal year and schedules the needed construction funds in Fiscal Year 87188 as foltows: a A 3; !y `k» Ms. Ane Wister South Florida Regional Planning Council January 24, 1986 Page 2 Amount F.Y. of WPA Item No. Description Type Funds 1 000's Commitment 6113307 Downtown Distributor - Interstate 4-R Bifurcated Ramps Construction $33,600* 87/8 6113375 Bifurcated Ramps Interstate 4-R Right -of -Way 20,300 85/6 6113376 Bifurcated Ramps Local Funds 2,300* 87/8 Local Streets Construction T O T A L S56.Z00 *The Department is currently reviewing the construction cost estimates. The unexpected requirement to acquire right-of-way has increased the public cost.to construct the project by an estimated 20 million dollars. Funds for interstate improvement projects of this type are prioritized on a`s ate• •' Wide`basis. Longstanding commitments to projects in other areas-may'impact funding availability for this project. In addition, the Gramm-Rudman Act r and the pending renewal of the Highway Act adds uncertainty as to the level of federal funding in the future. The ,DepartmeWs update of its Five -Year Transportation Plan is currently underway. It is our intent to modify the schedule and costs of this project in our Five -Year Transportation Plan, and submit the modified plan for the F annuaT update of the .TIP. Both the Department's Five -Year Transportation Plan and the MPO's TIP will be 'adopted in June. The Department halms already submitted `a list of proposed changes to the Transportation Plalnning"Council x: of the MP0 Which included the modification of the Bifurcated Ramp Projeci's' schedule and costs. If- necessary, the Department will take action to formally &Mend the TIP at this time. Regardless of this, it is impossible for the Department to proceed with construction of this project without the needed right -of -wary. ;. t: Sincaerely, Thomas L. Thomson District Director tw e,?:...... Planning and Programs Miami Regional Service Center - 402 N.W. 2rid Avenue Suite 590 mm"I. Florida 33128 Janumz7 - 16, 1986 W. William Powell. Director Flatro Dade County Public Works Dept. Ill N.W. 1st Street Mimi, Florida 33131 RE: 1-95 Bifurcated Rasps W.P.I. No.: 6113307 JAN 16 1980 State Project No.: 87006-2503 Federal Job No.: IR-95-1(350)2 eda Cbun Dade Dmr Its,: Powell: • An requested by the Dupont Plaza Tacbrdeal subc=mittu, the Deparamt of Mm"m- U-tium" b" reviewed the r" conceptual Sal for de 1-95 =t" Rops prepared by Trampo= Analysis Inc. and dated 1985 June I - 1 5. It is our recommendation that d"IP16 1 to rejected on the M" basis. • the eastbound and %astbound frer-my savants, including the Mrs will tot provide an acceptable level of service. • 71ne'"stbout-A off ramp to the puidj* garage and to S.E. 3rd Avenum are too close together. • Biscaym. Blvd.. from Biscayne Blvd. to S.E. 3rd Strut sill operate at an Unw4eptabla level of service. A i a geometric configuration of Swap entrance at S.E.2ftd &wm end Chair z*lat*mhip with the proposed signal at that 10cation. Wye are P"Mared to present our re titers to the tacbnical c=xLttae at yorr if you need any father informtion. please fuel free to call. F" R. R o Deputy Dir*c or Production RRAaim RM Hock. Ken VW A& T A — CC: SftNuwb Parapar, ma, QU JIM M*Ier, Fi1eL T= Thmmon :-54 'OiN IA L- RegionalSouth Florida Planning Council 3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 140 Hollywood* Florida 33021 RE: Letter of July Ile 1985 from Ethan Minsky Cultural Resource Assessment Request Amended ADA for the Miami Center DRI# Dade County, Florida Dear Mr. Paterson: In our review of this project we noted a discrepancy between what is stated as the answer to Question 19D in the above cited document and what was recommended in the letters included in the appendix (an pages 19.A.1-1 and 19.A.2). Whereas the answer to Question 19B. indicates in the event any "underground archaeological resources are uncovered during -excavations# a qualified archaeologist will be requested to examine them as required bylaw," the letters from the Dad* County Historic Survey and from the Florida Division of Archives and History, on the other hand, explicitly state that "an archaeologist should be present during the earliest phases of subsurface excavation of the most extreme western portion of the, Sall Point tract to determine if such archaeological data exists beneath the fill. The presence of an archaeologist (to monitor) construction activities in this specific area of the project would insure that significant data, artifacts and features would be recognized* recorded and possibly recovered before their destruction".. .It remains the recommendation of this office, that unless this area is preserved as groan space, that a professional archaeologist be present in order to observe ground disturbing activities in the western portion of the Ball Point tract in the *vent cultural resources,` may be present. 55 77777777 rW . mr. Barry Peterson - August 7, 1965 Page Two ' If you have any questions concerning our comments# please do not hesitate to contact us. Your interest and cooperation in helping to protect Florida'-s archaeological and historical resources are appreciated. Sincerely, wowww George W. Percy, Chief Bureau of Historic Preservation GWP/Wkp cc; .Gary Kresel Robert Carr 5 t t, ' Litu of 121"WHami. lor:. �tbtt j.1f Odjr •; • •.O. am 330706 x XAVICO L. SYANCZ tt MIMp. OUPOIDs 338"-Os0• ; .December 13, 1985 Hr. Russell D. L. Wirth, Jr. Mirth a Company $20 Brickell Key Drive J ; Suite 1204 AN Miami, Florida 33131' Dear Mr. Wirth: <' Mirth a Company and its development team are to be congratulated 4 for your -confidence in Miami and the private initiative you hav* talon, in the development of Biscayne Plata, a $400 million mixed `tt as9 complex which will be a world -class Miami landmark and the. largest in our downtown, located at the mouth of the Miami River , Lw.ths, heart of the city. Your willingness to collaborate closely with City officials has made our job of review much easier and will, i am sure, result in an extremely valuable addition to this great international city. The City of Miami has always worked closely with the business and development community in furthering the development of downtown 2 Miami. in the past ten years, we have seen over 87 new public and privats projects built worth in excess of $3 billion. Discayne Plata will be an excellent addition, bringing both world -class quality and employment to our city. In reviewing your project, we note several eiements which are of particular benefit to the citizens of Miami. First, Wirth a Company's concept of mixed -use (residential and retail as well as Office space) will create a dynamic ®urban village* and active people -place in the heart of downtown. Second, the Baywalk Promenade, which you will build with private funds and will open for public use, will link Bayfront Park and the Rouse Sayside Project to our Conference and Convention Center on the Miami. River with a beautiful walkway# restaurants and cafes lining your project. Third, the scale and world -class quality of your development will wake it a Miami landmark and potential rival to Rockefeller Center in New York. Fourth, and certainly not least, will be the 3,500 direct and indirect construction jobs, aad 10,000 permanent office tenant jobs, this project will generate, as well as ,added tax revenues for our city and neighborhood needs. Finally, for two years now, Wirth a Company has omitted its private capital 100% at risk to this city -building effort .and will attract $400 million of additional private institutional funds, all without seeking public financing,, publi.c.eubsidly or Public assistance other than reasonable approvals# an +exc6liont. example, of what private initiative can do with pity encouragement. 57 p, _40 �4 Sy^ j F 4, 3. i METROPOLITAN CADE COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE COUNTY MANAY L" OEVELQPMENTAMETRO•DADE CENTER 11t N.W. FIRST STREET j, SUITE 1210 IM MA O'r3•t.�E • • MUM{, FLORIDA3 SSt26'10 � 03) S7b�S.i' ST (S T 1 AUG 1-9 MS ALVASt 15, 1985 Mr"innation 4 liy e�11 Car 300 laMMi..Center 100 Chopin Plaza . s 'Mimi, n=ida 33131 RE: Hi ii. linter 1 - Cmi plia<nca to the Siscaym sayShoreline Drvelopmant Review Ordinance 8 -14 Dear Vz. Minskys This letter is in refer=* to your project known as Mimmi Canter I aid how it will be affected by Dada County Ordinance 85-14 (2=01i: Ds+ralmt Roview Developmt Review) arld Resolution 257-85 (Shoreline in Mssasal) . his .1+e0$1&tiM was adopted by the Cauity C sian i effort to ly tlni = developerant stasdazds regardless; of jurisdictional . 1n addition to the standards setforth, a review caXtLttae has been'f established which is c1wg*d .with the responsibility of ch ea' ±+lis psoject within the rrviaw bouttdaty and fmwlsting a naeoaanda to *Athar a project .crnform to the spirit and intent of the ,t�i.atati>Jlt. n Mwerefora, before any final Mi action is taken, the regasir is setfmth in the le�tias: 1NISt be satisfied. To assist yes t1t this domxmnts. f process, I hxn anc a copy of the above mentioned If this office cast .be of any assistance please dm't hesitate to call. yz Sincerely. David J• Scct.Ch, Coordinator4 d1� Shoreline Developmtt PAvUw C 0dtto 1 tm Ct s ti}rijl Peterson, %1C P, SFRFC City t _ Y N� •4c i ciSAR H o.),O ter cli� JAN,B 01988 CURRENT STATUS: MIAMI CENTER I e DEVELOPMENT ORDER -The current status of the development, as approved and as built, is described as follows: Condition 1 r Component As Approved As Built_ Phase I Office Tower 805,400 6SF 791,000 6SF,. a Retail 85,000 6SF 96,297 6SF Hotel (630 units) (634 units) 65ep400 6SF 6699000 6SF Parking Spaces 1670 sp. 1145 sp:* Phase II Residential 500 units '* Not constructed Parking Spaces .. .6_p. .2,366 sp F1oo A R do (net) 6 36 4 27 Lot Coverage 83% Undetermined Ground Usable Open in_ Phase .I jr not, Pedestrian Open .- 165 constructed.'; Spate at Main Floor Level - *1145 regular spaces can accommodate 1486 tralet parkie44 spaces. **Reduced to 324 units: letter. from Mr. Gould January Page 1 of 5 _Ate.. Cooments are as follows: a. The developer may delete a portion of the project e.g.. Phase 2 residential units and related parking. The Development Order limits the project, but does not require that all parts be built. A similar situation pertains to conditional use approval. b. There is a difference between the amount of parking a) proffered by the developer and approved by the Commission and b) actually provided for the office building and hotel. The Development Order "limited" the project to no more than 2365 parking spaces and did not make the 2365 spaces a requirement; the develpper may have intended to make up the shortfall of 625 spaces (1670-1145) elsewhere on the site and the developer proceeded under a valid building permit issued by the City for existing Miami Center I. c. Recent information provided by the developer shows that the area for retail and hotel may have been exceeded in existing Miami Center I, necessitating an "after -the -fact" amendment to the Development Order. The current status of the remaining conditions and compliance thereto is described as follows: Conditions Developer Compliance 2. Project considerations: Compliance prior to issuance` of riverwalk amenities building permit for Phase I; Phase --facade treatment 2 unresolved. --bay and river views --podium landscaping 3. Riverwalk and 8aywalk: amenities, easement, dedication, construction and maintenance. Partial compliance: baywalk '(Phase 1) easement recorded by Resolution 83-129e, February 10, 1983.. The construction of the baywalk surface has been completed but, there is no landscaping, benches or street furniture or lighting. A $500.000 performance bond to guarantee construction of the riverwolk (Phase 2) has expired. Rivervalk easement is being held in escrow by the City Clerk, per Resolution 83-1301P February 10, 1983, to be recorded when construction is completed'or by. the year 1"0, whichever comes first. Partial compliance: concrete -sub- best installed; landscaping, travertine surface and barrier guardrail not installed. 'The Depart of Public Works installed a barrier as interim safety `messpre 62 �. _ _a.,, n a `+ iS s`_i,%s� i ,�. �.,;9��„.:�_ li.:�fa�h_ [%t,. �L�..! — I:�,ka , • }. � �? � , �i���' S. Upper level pedestrian connec- tion to DCM station in Biscayne Boulevard. G. Consider upper level pedestrian connection between Miami Center I and II 7. Payment or bond for equitable share of interim traffic im- provements at a time set by City prior to issuance of a C.O." S. Funding traffic improvements adjacent to site: -four traffic lanes on Biscayne Boulevard from south end to SE 2nd Street and necessary dedication. -removal of traffic island near SE 3 Street. -provision of traffic signal at SE 3 Street. No compliance; the City judges that DCM station was constructed in the "vicinity" of Biscayne Boulevard and S.E. 2nd and 3rd Streets. The current owners of existing Miami Center I judge that this requirement is not now feasible because of the station shift of location. Compliance unenforceable. Condition is to "consider" not to "require". A stronger requirement in Miami Center II Developmen raFr has expired. Condition superseded. Dade County Department of Traffic And Transpor- tation letter of April 28, 1979 (Attachment A) accepted developer Alternate IV which provided a) reversal of two eastbound lanes on existing SE 3rd Street with forced left at SE 2nd Avenue plus an additional westbound thru lane on SE 3rd Street from SE 2nd to S. E..3rd Avenue and geometric alterations to the I.9S distributor _ramp; .b), extension of one sorthbound lane on Biscayne Boulevard between SE 2nd to 3rd "Street and c) a restricted left, on. 'SE 3 Avenue at SE 3 Street., The developer subsequently maintained that these interim improvements conflicted with and were superseded, by. plans for the I-955 bifurcated ;. ramps and the associated local street system. Partial compliance: S52,000 credit for Biscayne Boulevard work. Two other improvements were accomplished by others: the traffic island in Biscayne Boulevard near.. SE 3rd Street was moved by the Dade County Transportation Administration, (DCTA) for the Downtow-CompenOnt_.of Metrorail and repavdd by. Southeast Bank, and the 2nd left torn lane northbound from Biscayne Bou'ltvard to SE 2nd Street was cleared by the DCTA and constructed by 'Southeast Bank. The owners of existing Miami 63. -addition of 2nd left turn lane Center I have offered to provide the northbound gnto SE 2nd Street. traffic signal at SE 3rd Street. Note that the Miami Center II Development Order (now expired) by reference, apportioned $481,598 (in 1980 dollars) in surface street. improvements to Miami Center I (see Attachment 6). The t52,000 credit refers to line 7 of Attachment B. Note the interplay of Conditions 6 and 7: the developer successfully s` argued that Condition 6 was superseded by subsequent plans for the Y-95 bifurcated ramps and =44 associated local street system and then the developer was relieved. of $4819596 (452,000 noted above) in associated local street system ^�4 s improvements allocated to Miami rr Center I, as specified in the Miami Center II Development Order, when ` that Development Order expired. 9. .Dedication of'land, eqUivalent. No compliance, but owners of exist• -1 to°the, extension of Biscayne ing Miami Center I have offered the Boulevard southerly to Miami dedication. River to City for public pur. posts. 10. Chopin Plata parking provisions Partial compliance. The Public Works Department and Department of Off Street Parking approved plans and completed final inspection of eonstructi on of the parking area _ only, except the travertine surface ' remains to be placed on the sidewalk on the north side of Chopin Plaza. " 11. Provision of parking spaces for Phase 2 condMiniwes not constructed, condominiums equivalent to Dade The developer's original proposal was County Zoning Code. 695 parking spaces for ' condominium units. The Dade County Department of Traffic and Transportation (Attachment A) cited 660 parking spaces for S00 condominium units. The developer, by letter of January 21, 1983 stated his intention of constructing 324 condominium units (for which 69S parking spaces would meet the DM recommendation). 64 r Ni 7777 12. Analysis Of seawall impact an compliance: Analysis by E.S. Iverson Marine Communities. Biologist, University , of Miami Rosenstiel School, dated June 13.- 1979,, supplied to the City by letter of May 16. 1985. However, information supplied by the developer to the South Florida Regional Planning Council an August 8. 1985 indicates that the seawall. bulkhead modifications have been completed necessitating an after - the -fact" permit. 13. Notice to Dade County Historic. Compliance Survey of project start. 14.- Complex source permit. Superseded: Issuance of complex source permits by State has been,. r. suspended. 15. Construction commencement in compliance two years (May 241, 1981). 16. Submission of a complete Compliance Application for Development, Approval. Vie Y 65 .�Qlili r iRPAGT ASSESSMENT REFUiT Prepared by South Florida (later Management District tEC7 Y r Prefect: MIJIMY CENTER I SfM� ID No.: 85-205 Location: Cit of Miaml/Dade County y Site: 8.41 acres Existing Land Use: Office Build ing/Notei/Parking Carap (5.45 acres)' y Undeveloped (3.01 acres) ►repo:ed Land Use: Office I with supporting retail, hotel, and h residential uses Squire footage: 29271,000 sq. ft. office uses 30s 000 sq. ft. retail uses hrkiny spaces: 4 Motel Rom:6�4 oweliing Units: ISO ffJ 00 Threshold: Office Park = 300,000 sq. ft. II MLUS12H Stlii REC" MO TITI,OH_ S The Mimi Center I Development of Regional I act (ORI is a proposed and r° partiall existing office complex with ing rota i, AOtale and residential uses located in downtown Mimag Diseayne at t = Plaza. Development of the bflance,of the site is ;cheduleddtto muurriin two phases from 1947, MI. In rrviswi the, available data, staff has concluded•that the project could ire *v* 0 in that regional Impacts`�ld-not such a manner adverse be likely to error with regard to draiaage, storrwAter eality, water=slated vegetation and wildlife, water no and wastewater effluent disposal. Due to its size and impervious cover, this project will r Vire a General lereit for its surface water managemtent system. At that ties the iicant . will seed to confine that the Miami Dade Vater Sewer Author4ty and ter Use Permit No. 12=0 17 has been modified to include an allocation of;Water kervice sufficient to this project along with all other committed users. to addition, a stater Use Permit will also be required fron this District for any dewatering required for the subgrade portions of the proposed construction. h. h YV``cc _ � l �it.. t . ....-. »..a..l).5: ... h.....sndi.a.+11L<.'S.t fad'"• t(� .: i. } i.. i t YI .1'. P.� } III GgHRAL, PROJECT REUT[R INFORMATION The Miami Center I DRY is in &I go existi and proposed office complex re r located on a 8.46 acre site In downtown HiaV next to Biscayne Bay, Sayfront Park,, and Dupont Plaza an the east side of Biscayne Boulevard (so* Exhibit.1). Phase Of the Project, known as The Miami Center Existing, Is alread developed an the northern 6.45 acres of the site and consists of the Idward Sall Office Buildir .the spi ft. of office Wt plus 14 750 sq. ft. of retail space) 634-row villion Metal, Podium which contains 75000 sq. ft. of retail space plus $00 parking spaces# and a 300-space office parking structure. Phases 11 and III scheduled to be built in -and 1"0-91 respectively are known as Biscayne Plaza Phase I and Biscayne Plan Phase 2 and will be located on the southern 3.01 acres of this *sItev The Biscayne Flag Phase I office tsar will include 60 dwol ' ling unitS, 700jOOO SQ, ft. of Office Uses and 160,000 sq. ft. of retail uses and adds.1v200 parking spaces to the podium Parking rairage. The Phase 2 office tower will include 90 dwelling units,, 730,00 sq.. ft. of office wi­ and GO,OW sq.ft. of retail uses. Exhibit 2 shows the Master Site Plan for: the total mini Center I project. At the, ate present is zoned CBD-J (Central Business District). The. coposed: uses are consistent with both the zoning and Comprehensive Plan This isvi" has, ft" porformed4y South Florl I do Vater Management Distr ct to, provide ths, SoutA.Flor!", ton al Flafthil .-Comil,with vregift&l 48SOSSUnt wate, ated.r I o $So$ ut$ of -this project from "" 'om'th@­ District's rscti4e. 1his Is'sot'S -P&Mit Under Chapter W3, I.F.L, nor is it a 9"r4nUe for said, permits. ,.. Fs. li by .. .. SUBJECT: SURFACE WATER, MANAGEMENT MIAMI CENTER I DR1 85-ZO5 . • • .. •. <i T P :RESOLVED: AMINOR T :UNRESOLVED: MAJOR I on iderations ac s wean (pass go o o a e W s X • • h s reau pre vs post; Dacity of receiving rater X X arts s I. 8.. s n SYSa ater mansomen areas : sc ary e oca on an route i ..1 ...._ .; .. tGI nceivi water : X 2, method -;: ra!' P.Wlcrol a eva ona ' Ienvironbentai/rater use) X i S:'FT00 °'a a ec 'ilon .1 911croac n ne i, r X P. • • 15 Vverfralpig _ Amner,MA ii Iiconsiderations_: ' X B.` a t` lens ve waters.: C• •; r 33 'too D. azas av eras use R E• r n e+as : : (I)`At'the the of"peruit application. design details for the proposes surface • water "agement system wi1I need to be subwitted. (2) The applicant will need to provide calculations confirming compliance with rater qua1-ity Hteria. - F ��,.r t ."•... ._. ... ..,.. ij •r._ +,..n .. . Sv. In+-: �<><x, JL. rv' ..,i ." -t l : .,. at k nre951x,3it; 'ti��}.� a�e'ii`ivr�i:TY��3�'AL'f T. • • AT :RESOLVED: :UNRESOLVED: _ I acted even A. e es ential; .. . �• . roar on rate X •'. yr x ratio Z. serva on. ac ces i 11 rf state law) X ., n• r er . a rate a ... ca on :. ; ; .. n ery r c •: • : _ an w- : • • mouse ; II r Av tl bi11t -s Non• ±� i „ • ehd/or Dot able) ions �# A - ' • r rat ; Y v r 3 s ;z (See footnote on page 6) 69 a may' �aka 9 5i f _ r ........... .. N/A Due 3. Inacts alit a Quantity) N� At nor V users SAGS A Sued s &A pa re encangered s its habitat VIC C. inq water intrusion A m firour4water ct water rate Su"C' d. Its ts ontpollution Sou s R LA *x stiog/Rroggsed "/A off -Sit 4 Suit"abill roDosod option X 7 2. or" Lem jerm INA A $SGRAD10- W tTICI&I US* 8. Of A. !LA- Gosign •lit a. Lxt*rtt of otner comft�- events relative to 4.gjrmj&t#d capability X LD (See footnotes an page 6) '70 S ki, • .._. __ �..__i .. • n�..�� �.....• �..• ►w . Brent UM. 1 0_ 4MMY.L■Lt awn ■YrY■t • rrates "} ROOM on roecons err ce area o WervaVe ro on: • a ; term b. son•beneficialu e (1) At prisent then is an application in-house for a codification to this K y: percit-which would increase its allocation sufficiently to service this project. 4z, .. i.444 weraae da11y Iemand (N) : X IIOff- ite di sai F nc umentation X Rod or effluent CISPOS47• for X t ra i t was ater re se : C. a oul materials ' III Onesite di A. sosal CERIUM' I 209s N4A _ on 0 "nosMIA 11,119414tivIll lociltiono -retention/detention areas (separation of ON system trtoq;tiastswater disposal NA i.: F.Cluse e was ater muse i (9ro1-0 - W recharge; lake rr L raw l • tc.)A en a or verse impacts: (quslit�r 1 quantity, i•e• season it t A in ill n i nts s ILA i .. C. =�r�..�.��_r.._rsnw�� tee_. •� • w_rurr�irrwr.�w•.srrean rare 4; IV tardous Uterials Coro 7�' potentiall f r` azardous t 1 ration A ; • s r ns z 72 elf • PART IV - Silt WY APO RECOMMENDATIONS ry 4,. The Nvelopment of Regionel Impact Assessment for Miami Center I (Miami Center existing and Biscayne Plaza) indicates that the project mould have the following positive regional impacts: r5, • r • Up to 2.500 permanent new jobs would be generated by the project, and. as 9-result, nearly 2.900 additional full-time jobs could be .created 3r in South Florida, with a $108 million increase in total wages and $184 million In value added to the regional economy. t o- A net positive fiscal impact of t8.1 million would be created by the project. r • A reduction in the growth of regional energy consumption would result from the energy efficient conservation measures proposed by the Applicant for the project. The Council eveluatlen indicates that the proposed project should not create adverse Impact on soilst animal life, or vegetation. However,. in terms of adverse regional impacts the project would: t �A F'}rfvi✓§ _- } Increese potable water and wastewater demand by an average of 415.000 - gallons per de 9 y and generate an average of 42 tons. or 149 cubic yards, of solid waste per day. 4 • Increase annual energy use within the Region by the equivalent or nearly 6.7 million gallons of fuel oil. • Increase the amount and nunber of hazardous wastes generated on -site.` t' • Piece additional unfunded demands upon pollee, emergency rescue, and , ... air* services. Generate 2,464 AM and 2,250 PM peak -hour vehicle #rips (Miami Center existing and proposed) on the regional roadway network and, along with c other development traffic, reduce levels of service on segments of the regional roadway network. Recommendations Based on Consideration of the above specified positive and negative ,s impacts, it is the recommendation of the Counctl to the Miami City Commission that the Amended Application for Development Approval for Miami Center 1 be APPROWD sub_ie�ct to incorporation of the conditions listed below into the existing Development Order to increase the probabillty of realizing positive regional impacts and to aritlgete, 75 4 - rya I reduce, or eliminate adverse regional Impacts. Adoption of a 0evelopMent '•:l Order (00) with a cost allocation different from the one recommended below for construction of transportation improvements will not be .e basis for an appeal by the Council, provided that the 00 commits funding and _ Construction scheduling that ensure the reouired Improvements are funded Y . and will be constructed connendent with the project, pursuant to s. y SK1 580.06(13)(02, Florida Statutes. } THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY WILL: Biscayne Plaza 1. incorporate the following into the project design and operation to minimize the cumulative impact of project traffic, and Its associatedpollutant emissions, on air quality: r • iesignate three percent of on -site employee parking spaces, ;y J located as close as possible to elevator and building entrances, for exclusive carpool or vanpooi use. o' Actively encourage and prartote car and van pooling by 4' establishing a car pool information program. - o Provide Metrorall, Metrobus, and Metromover roes end Schedule �. information In convenient locations throughout the project. L R F' � e � • t 14� `�� xis f.y� • Y S } r,3i._: ensure containment end focllltate cleanup of any spill or leakage. .; • Require that the loading/unloading of any hazardous material or hazardous waste shell occur in a covered loading/unloading dock ?_ with a spill containment area not connected to the project drainage or sewer system. e 'Prohibit any outside storage of hazardous' wetario.ls' or;- ' =: hazardous waste. e 'ibQ,uire of hazardous west* generators to contract with''a:. Ilcensed public or private hazardous waste disposal service'or processing facility and to provide to Oade County OM copies of gone of the following forms of documentation of proper hazardous waste management practices:' a hazardous waste manifest; a: a shipment to a permitted hazardous waste,wanagement yy' facility; or a confirmation of receipt of materials from a recycler`or a 2 waste exchange operation. e No+lfy any tenant genereting wastes of the penalties for improper disposal of hazardous waste pursuant to Section 403.727, Florida Statute$. 78 q rt h fc 1 e?ati•cR F: -..R, _ j .. t -+Y �� h � �� " - 777 3. L`v t. Natural gas or other non -electric energy sources for'000king end Maier heating in restaurants, where feasible. g. Soler water heaters or waste hoot recovery units to preheat K' cooking and Meshing hot water in restaurants• etc., where feasible. ; h. Not water temperatures set at or below 105'F where allowed by .t health codes and equipment requirements. N ;M s .y i. Lavatory water flow of 0.8 gallons per minute or less then o- r water closets that use no more then three and onhelf gallons ;or flush. } j. Tinted or reflective glass to reduce the amount of direct sunlight entering air conditioned areas. It. Light-reflocting and/or tight colored wall and roof surfaces. Y ' with solar absorbtlon coefficients less then or equal to :., 0.90. 1. Electric4l metering on a floor -by -floor basis. op. Computerized energy management system capable of start/stop opttm Izatlon, demand limiting, lighting control, and zoned control. 112 s;. f , 12. Integrate all original end supplemental ADA information into a consolidated Application for Development Approval (CADA) and submit two copies of the CADA to the Council, one copy to the 1 City, and one copy to the Florida Department of Community Affairs is within thirty (30) days of the effective date of the Development - Order. The CADA shall be prepared as follows: f a. Where new, clarifled, or revised information was prepared - subsequent to submittal of the ADA but prior to issuance of r u the 00, whether in response to a formal statement of ; informed - needed or otherwise, the original pages of the ADA will be replaced with revised pages. b. Revised pages will have a "Page Number (R) - Date" notation, with "Page Number" being the number of the original page, "(R)" indicating that the page was revised. and "Date" stating the date of the revision. 13. Prepare an annual report in accordance with the requlrements specified in Condition 27 herein and submit copies to the Council, City, and Florida Department of Community Affairs on or before..,; each anniversary date of the Development Order. k- �}83 w credit to FDOT for 100 percent of the costs of roadway modifications, identified by FDDT, Council staff or the Applicant, that exclusively serve Biscayne Plaza traffic. 16. Dedicate ell easements and rights -of -way which are located on the southern portion of Trac+ D, Block 1, Dupont Plaza (i.e., the 4 Biscayne Plaza property) which are for Biscayne Plaza and which are required by the City. County, or State in order to Construct z > required transportation improvements, including the second -level pedestrian system, if constructed. 4 THE CiTY WILL., 17. Approve no more "an the amount of development specified by tend use category in Exhibit 5. Is. As specified in Rule 9J-2.23. F.A.C., Identify in the DR) Dove Iopmenf.'Order any approved development, Including the acreage bttributalbie to each approved land use, open space, areas for preservation, and green belts: and th* structuresand/or Improvements to be placed on the property, including locations, acreages, gross square footage. number of units, and other major characteristics or components of the development. 198. If a public sector financing package has not been committed prior to December 31, 1991, withhold Issuance of any building permits for Biscayne Plaza Phase 11 until the Applicant front -ends, which may Include arranging loans to, or bond purchases from, appropriate government agencies, $517.000 to FDOT pursuant to Condition 14a. 19b Pursuant to s. 380.0605)(02, Florida S+e+u+ost withhold Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy for Biscayne Plaza until all Interim road Improvements identified In Exhibit 4 are constructed. If a public sector financing package has not been committed by December 31, 1991, withhold Issuance of any building permits for. the Biscayne Plaza Phase 11 until the Applicant has fron+-ended,, which may Include arranging loans to, or bond purchases from, appropriate government agencies. $5#0279000 to FDOT pursuant to Condition 14c. 21. Withhold Issuance of any certificates of occupancy for the a tf . u. Issue a DRI Development Order in accordance with the following criterla:. e. The DRl Development Order shall specify: . • The name of the development. 11 R; • The name of the developer. 4 • .The authorized agent of the developer. r r:- • A statement that: -. The Application for Development Approval (ADA) Is approved: or The ADA is approved subject to conditions, specifying .F the conditions: or `.3 The ADA is denied, specifying the reasons for denial and changes in the development proposal, If any, that would meke it eligible to receive a development approval. F' b, Findings of fact and conclusions of low addressing whether ,x and the extent to which: TIN J r�- to 87= w v x Y P • The development unreasonably interferes with the ` achievement of the objectives of an adopted state lend development plan applicable to the area; and r • The development is consistent with the local land`>' Yr development regulations and the adopted local �. comprehensive plan; and ;.r • The development will be consistent with the recommendations of the Council DU Assessment pursuant to Subsection 380.0601), Florida Statutes. e The development makes "adequate provision for the public facilities needed to accommodate the Impacts of the proposed development" or the City commits in the Development Order to provide these facilities consistent with the approved DRI development schedule. c. A legal description of the property including acreage. 230 Incorporate the Consolidated Application for Development Approval, - as revised pursuant to Condition 12, by reference Into the Development Order for Miami Center as follows: Be. • �i • Development Order conditions to be reviewed by the City prior to Issuance of any local development perml+v and a for any condition that cannot reasonably be monitored as part or the local permitting and Inspection processes, a notarized affidavit from the Applicant assuring compliance with such Development Order conditions to be Included as part of the annual report required by Condition 27 herein. 27. Require +he+ an annual report be submitted to the Council, City, and DCA on each anniversary of the effective date Of the Development Order, which report shall Include, at a minimum: a. A complete response to each question In fxhlbl+-6. b. Identification and description of any changes In the plan of development, or In then representations contained In the ADA or In the phasing for the reporting year and for the next year, M" ............ c. A summary comparison of development activity proposed and actually conducted for the year. d. identlfIcatton of undeveloped tracts of land, other then Individual single family lots, that have been sold to a separate entity or developer. t. Identification and intended use of lands purchased, leased or optioned by the developer adjacent to the project site since the Development Order was issued. f. 'An assessment of the Applicant's and the local government's compliance with the conditions of approval contained in the DRI Development Order and the commitments which are contained in the Application for Development Approval. g Specification of any amended DRI Application for Development Approval or requests for a substantial deviation determination, the+ were filed in the reporting year and to be filed during the next year. h. An indication of a change, if any, in local government jurisdtctlon for any portion of the development since Issuance of the Development Order. 91 TT 4 it �• h 1 ti .v: LY ". ..E'� � i. u..fiti9. a: 1 ` � ..., � x�l s� .� � u i. A list of significent local, state and federal permits which have been obtained or which are pending by agency, type of permit, permit number, and purpose of each. } f, j. A statement that all persons have been sent copies of the ,rt annual report in conformance with Subsections 380.06(14) end (16), Florida Statutes. {ram k. A copy of any recorded notice of the adoption of the Development Order or any subsequent modification that was; recorded by the Applicant pursuant to Subsection Y4� 300.0604)(a), Florida Statutes. { 1._ Copied of one of the following documontatlons-,of apprgw)0e disposal of all hazardous waste: • a hazardous waste manifest, a bill of lading from a bonded hazardous west* transporter indicating shipment to a licensed hazardous waste facility, or • a confirmation of receipt of material from a recycfor,I e waste exchange operation, or other permitted hazardous waste management facility. P., 3 Y: m# Any other.information required by the Department of Community Affairs (OCA) in accordance with. Section 3180.0604) and (16), Florida Statutes (1985). 280 Incorporate into the Development Order for Miami Center a timeline showing the project phasing, specific elements of the project _ plan, and conditions of the Development Order which are to be met in each phase or by other specified dates. 29. Require, within 30 days of the effective daft of the Development Order, recordation of the Miami Center Development Order with the Clerk, Dade County Circuit Court, pursuant to Section 380.06(14)(d), Florida Statutes (1985), specifying that the Development Order runs with the Biscayne Plaza land (the southern portion of Tract 0, Block 1. Dupont Plaza) and is binding on Miami Center Joint Venture. its successors, and/or assigns, jointly or k', seWal i y. 30. Attach copies of all exhibits referenced in the 0Rl Development Order. ij A EXHIBIT t Y CODE FOR WASTE 7YtES COMMONLY ASSOCIATED WITH EACH -SIC INDL'STAY a A Waste pesticides .4 D Washing and rinsing solutions containing pesticides C . topty Pesticide containers 0 Spent toxaphene solutions or sludges from dipping } l' Spent pesticide solutions or sludges other then toxapheae from° s rs i dipping n T Dust containing heavy metals Q Washings and rinsing solutions containing heavy metals M Wastewater treatment sludges containing heavy metals. , - _ Waste ink 1 ignitable point wastes containing flammable solvents (flash .point y A less than 1400'F) y K Liquid paint wastes containing heavy metals (cadmium, chromium. F mercury or lead) Y L Spent solvents 4} M Still bottoms from the distillation of solvents N filtration residues from dry cleaning operations 0 Cyanide wastes .� . t Strongly acidic or.alkaiine wastes' Q Spent plating wastes R Waste asssonia S Photographic wastes T Ignitable wastes (flash point 1pas than 10'f):` D Wexte+rater sludges containing pantachloropheno]a creosote,' or arsenic V Waste formaldehyde W Lead -acid batteries X Waste explosives T Waste oil 2 Other h t 94 a -�'i..,,k�,4ia,7s-r.r....:.s.:...z.�r.+v=.R:t#-L..._.T.�,_n�a,vw�.�.ztdl,zn,..°. :Fr,.Me., _,.4.�..,,,__:t�zi,�2v:.r,.tJn....t�:w..ssa$4axa�a,Za.'taL�r•�•+1i.Yr1Ssa ,!,ter+t�[r.;�r� i �TF _ - li LISE Or MYtMtiAL NUAOOOUS WAsn COMMONS 91 SIC fODIP SIC+tote TWO Mese--iRtion SIC taste Types Meseripttaw _ C"t Code ills-ilR1: ACIiC'RLIMRE I/AI Lt faofiwg end Sboo1 %"a$ 11er! MI LT Clegg awl Cieriwg ttao! flit ARC Carla Ifs• Lrttf tseaveties and Ponedso ion 146N fill ARC Cation flit JRLM special Toads Coat►actor• 9I12 AK tobsreo fill AK $"or Crepe 2012-119941: IMMgFACTMIMG IMM USts plot. AsC vogeteble aid notes, Forms* fill ARC fgrrf Crops Zit! Canned specialties ftlA ARC Citron froit irawta step - Canoed and Caved risk add Soefeeds • fill AK Orsomatel flerieeltere a Mafsetp ptsast16 fill L!1 Read woo** fabric Milts. stool flit AK Grove&$ tor". prieeeiip Cep Jill I" Morons fall Length and Rwee Msoiorp Elie ARC Reif Cottle Feedlots Jilt Log Negi*re. oacept wowtw•s tall Length Repo Length flit AK beef Cattle. escapt Potdlsto We.. 11subeo) lost LM Rate Ostetolear Mille ISM AK Shoop sod Cott forms IM I" Roil ttai*rarsr MiIto fold AK Central Liveotec! list IN Cirester knit fabric Mills Mil AKT soil preparation services Me I% Warp Rail faNic little flit am Crop Planting. Csttivolion. OW hatectlee list IA RaitNwg llill$. KC fat? LPItf Crp /s►eestiwg. Prirrllf by Ilsebhe 2261 to Fiaisbore of Used harm Fabrics of cotton - Elva T Cotten giants$ 2262 LN finishers of Rrsad vovea Fabrics of Nos -%ads fEot AT Gwersl Crop servicts fiber and Si I& - Ois1 A Liveetecb services. escept Services 109 Aslset 2269 IV fisishore of *rood sloven fabrics. Mse-Made Tibor Specislitist ad Si Ill flip A Low sad Gerdes Revelers Ills Ill 11eoew Carpets sad Rogs fill AT Ormea a,tel Slrob and tree forvicts Jilt Los taped Carpets ens most Jilt I% Carpets and Roes. INC M11-11SI: poeltSm 2414 JRLT wad Kitchen cabinets 245S JRLt Marooned Vowel, sad plywood edit AK tisbol Yeast• 2616 JRLt sofewoed Trager and Plywwd 10M Aft: $ est. 1lorseries a fret !crab Coderive 10 26S1 ALt Mobile oe.es tettactiy 2611 ALI Protabrirated Need evildings and Csep,onowt• KSi ARCS lereatrq ferstus 2491 a flood !reservist 2492 LIT Particleboard tf,lt-1fte: 070Mst11Kfiglt fill AM Ism" IlosuNeld Tornilere. except fpNsislereA %. 1S14 RLOPQ street Messebold retailer* its$ 1JM ilaboar •aid street cmetrestion ISO? JRLM 11aad Is and Radio Cabinets v I` fb2t LfMRf frfige,, Tsnott, rood lilt ed MiaMssp CeM.tfettloa Isle JRNit MauseNeld farwitsre. Ntt Ills pt Plembip, lloetiag lancers Electtisl 00 Air ., _ ISI/ AM we" Office rerwitete ia.Aitiesiwg psi? NMI I 01rta1 011ie* feroitere ; flit AILt Matins, paper ""go M# f e4mrstime. ltoo*f ISbI ALIT Mato Parlitions sad ristereo a Casotemetisti, IILC SUP still" Ibtel partitions and fielstos E If4/ Lt Fetraetto.-titt. llstelr. oleo floods Mara 2011 LMPfT - Velp Mi110 91 ir': JRLT Floor Larisg leas Other l`lser"glo* MC 2621 imn Psptr piles. steep+ 90114ime paper Mills X 1611. LIMIT paperboard Mills Mtrsk—rolvetrf;tseo been t4nttfiof as • Potential *emsester of Aaordase we lib! ILP paper coal felt sad Closing 1D oil tiko beois "set the iwdwu� ats�1 avneirste,csrrosive, feactive, igt+itablt, lK1 IL! fags, turps tomtit* gps � swrl w+i task Motes. !� inverse. stC.ted*-.f/11, Roil PtepsretIse services. lus ILP fro -Cot leper sad ►sporbostd end Csrjb"rJ i is ,@+pleat' oI aeisrtotal wf tonic, pesticide wales.,_ tarty sit taste..lisrei is Jµo 14P Nesu1 and ttaldp0 Pslp ca.de N is le:.;t Mao aae*ioaslF be"+lstanrwtel.ia tNo .lit*r}tort se � aotgties ?A:• ILP Cowvettod pope• and rapr.basrd rrudaeta, we #etyof, forof t~aastdose oNf* Jost UP fwld�ws'Pep.bapA Rnae• 2p�12 ILP set-w Parvobns.e poop• -* -etst Oatimaere cl•s*ititd ? this ILP :: e/ CYrwgaNA all Sstld robsoaps s. r. i. - Ir-- - x - fed N•t.-*hsM►ere • i . sit losses, I"** setxriptias sic Haste two beocfipeiww coop CobI 1*1141 ILIPT sanitary to" Coolokwev sell L Mots 11 Shav cot Stock 41 fiedianq WS $I" Fiber Cams. 10600. new. and Wittiest ftedmis IM L Leather Cloves 4 %agrees soild6es tow an# vaildial Ileardl lfill@ 1146 L vew000 reelgrat. incept Athletic In# IFILOM Newspapers; ftbligbise and "041" 1161 L fill NILI" "fisiftcoss, robstablas a Prialles gill L "weva' a ftodbns 6 ftr%rq trio NILO" 00660: 100401,1411661% aidftintifles III: L Personal 0.061hrr r.6004 fill NILWQ *a* pristine is" I. Loather coods. SIX M$ OILS" Can= ties printing. Letterpress and I1c1VO4 1211 IT Flat class list VILIPPQ C~rvI&I frietles. Lithaisr"ble MI JUL stick and SIVOC14ral C147 life its$ OILM" It"Wevial end Plate ftintimig IM JIL Ceramic well and pleat Me 11 1% IIILWQ Camwtciat Priftsimse govettle 3261 JUL Vitreous China Plw*inn fileverve a" 1141%even 7141 NILOM lossimpsi sesime" for" IM - JIL villages Chile: Tabla and wifeltoin Articise fill I1111' 1111two stew creetims card hiblISM" stoobookes Loosolval Makes. and Me'dees 3261 J11L fine torshowware duhispovelp) UMV a viegbVie too* 1111,41" sm*biodino and Related %it MA JRL articles Porcelain flogivital S"Plifs rill PlItz altiewo T typeaattiwg AsheliV6.804 uterine Wto JIM Falloff produces. Utc fold, fgtiT IfflWassic Flowage MI LT Gaabel$. racking and Sealing Devitos 111tv poll F101041111111 LXTW Industries 10"Awale Chemicals. INK Plastics, slagerielf. slatwic seeing. OW III? I feast furnaces. Solve warns. sod Raising 1"ises fta-valcomitabl# loll T PreAucts serve Wife grewiviR and Steel Wells sed Spikes part MI Leon IJWIT 11roleatic Rubber callatesic Wea-VAde Fibers Cold 1141104 Steel %*#I. Strip. and sees 11176 LxrT swetbetic *vgamic fibers. ontept collolosic Mt v Stool pipe M4 tubes rest biological Predates grow oven foundries J loll 06r4iciftole sod setemicale plat T 11181108610 Iron fadsjfits '2111141 LP ftemsevotical peopefstle" list I Steve olowwrivi. "Er prisare SAWIttep and Refining of Load I"$ I'LIVIT Seep and Other befor"4190 ent"t speciality primers Sawiting 444 Relining of ZINC ALPIP" cleasore Specialty Cte"Wro, Polish*#, and sententlem ljjs v Priftery production of %tominew IP#imsry soolliar 80J Reflaing of lessivirradq 2841 Well !effect active Apate, Floloblee "to, 1161 T urge$%. "Et soce"ory Sorltion sod Refining of Ponfortive 2011006104 *its. sod Assistants Meuts M6 n" Perlowo, coseet Igoe a" Other irellet Pf"11141219119 3111 Bellies. *fowl*$ 804 f2grudiall at Copper me IFGLO" hilt end Mlit# Pradocce 3153 Aluminum Shortroil . plate sodded 1061 M0 L"M T C" a" WNW cliveicals, ) C"Oes, e cyclic Intermediates. cyclic lCoss tart IDS! NX100V Atemises 11streFrodects lye!. a" Colonic Firwoke (Ldhoo a" Tem*#n) MS KPI1M Atomism Bellies and *revise, ORC 1#69 LMM 1166"Irlol orgosic cbrwcoio. WC 1156 NLW*W Mostios. Drawise and Itatfediss of somforg"o 111#181. tacvpt Copper and Maming" '"It *KIM fteticiele sod Agricalteral Cloolcolo, KC 3351 ELMOM Ilrevise and lasalogivis of ftose forfms Wire mIAdbt*;Ipeo sod S@Oldmto 1161 J162 IF v Alvelavis fo*Wrios lCalt in$$) stage. stooge copper and Copper ease Allow f"I raw Friwriwg is& MID 1 flasterroes towwries Icalliags). sic "MTV �,Cbmicol Froperativig Fr1rg1v"ft Refining 31011 KMRT obese most Irpsesse AeVA4111 -F#tto end Costing1199 WNW"Priwors Mrtal Products.off I seUlif 'T testing so. 0", Grosses, Coo pupa n1JRIftjT weal cams metal shipping sorrels. Brune. pro*. 064 rates "We nail M.0111119 code*#* kit 13 11f WE i Stt, Yeete,tgpe� Dtsetiptiw SIC Ypte,tTMs b"criptiea - Cwe,. Cede _ Ml KRIPM Neat aid Ed" fiat®. Incept Nscbiet tests and ISR1 NL'NIIO Me and Coe Casoressars paws Soso )KS oow" flow# led 104041 eratilocisst wens Ib14 NI,14" I so"5*00 b Sae slobs 1Sf,1 NL'M+pAf lnsaelriol pr«ass warwut A Ov.ws 14l9 founoQe elersrare. NEC Me NL'kww NtcOtssicel pear trawanis•ioa Eyaipaeat. N1t 1411 NI.O!l" twins$&# from doe ttttot laaltarf lento: ISR• NI/M10" Central Industrial tOsceiwtcg and ttiwlpu.wt. 11ts riIt MMWWT ►twa6iog ftstere fittings end Veto Well Candid ISsI NLMMQ Electronic twaphttag [®+ipa.wt - 1411 NLW)PQT Ntatittg-E+edpntat. escopt Eltcttic.sod were Air NL't" Caleaistiwp ► Accounting 11Ar41wts. wu•►t feenecta Electronic 149iparat %41 K NOM fabricated Structural Nttat ISse NLMtHQ office Nackiees. W-C 1e41 NUMOVI stool /ogre. !elf. fromes- Qeldisgs, and trial IS111 NLVIWl C~Fciel Lowdrv. Dog Cleaning. sad pressing 140 OLNO T rebricotei plots Yee! tlecAiaes 1a44p IliibpQT EMet Mete! 10otR 1NS NL�Mt►0 Air Conditioning sad Ware Me prating tewips.wl E4,416 tlL"DM Arcbit"twel sad Meseeetst Wool Moen gas taarrciol gad Iwdastrial MrlriRe►atitMr 16411 NtstlOW prolabriested Metal wildiags sae Caepsstats tqaisarae "610 "LMM" Miscellanea" Wool Yarb ISS6 NLONNQ Nesseriag sae Dispensing passe 11#51 NLilt"I Screw Mot0► es, prsdoete slide NL'111eQ Service ldast►w 11acAanr•. etC %S! NtitO"Q► Daflta.'Nete, Screw. Waste, sad Mashers 11412 ROD"" CatbaMeco. fistans. piston sings R pelvte 14iET Nti10Wr Stew add fleet ferSigs Ise1 ML"pw Notbinty. latest Electricel. KC Ms NLM"t Aweeative &savisp 1+1; 111.140►OT Fewer. Dietelbatiwa sae Rptcishg T►snsfurrer 1440 Ntl11/4f Meted Stoe►dago, Net Seth NLW" Saitrtngear and Switchboard Apporstwe 3411 INAOM ttectroplstias. felislling. plot lot., AM"l ale$. 1611 MOM "mots 0 Ceeersters sad Catering1t,:1 Iltm" ladestrist Coastal* 1419 Mttl"" toting. Sagroving..sad Allied Services. NEC 1621 NUM" Yeldiag Ayorsoas. tlecttic +" 1451 S..tt Atws Aswwiliee Cain N1"" Carbse d Graphite pradects !b>P1 A wtnities, eacept for Shall Arse. WC Ib?• WHO" tttetrical ladestrial Apostates. Net .0 44E4 Ordaeace ad Aeeassecits. 11M I611 NLIO" Noasthels Mtf►igeretors sod Naar and were wrotrrre 'j ISIt W!Am Stets, ere.'sd Nrdreelie Teebines 1614 INA" Electric Noaorrore+ aid taws 11t$ NtiNIFIR laterost Cowbestios Sgineo. NEC 1416 NUN►w0 Srvise Nschines TSiI NLMolNT fart! thctlieerf od E"irlNrt IbitJ NL'IOW Neesetwed Appliances. KC ISM NUMM Card" trotters i Late A Csrlw I"Ipwut Iwt N&J"" Electric Lowe IS1l t1LONWi;T Conetractieti Nseblowrf WA.Ewipwot I441 NLN01I Cernnt•Glrlisg Yirt Devices list NlittOpQ'1 Mining MKI1100rs gad 5"10 tot. saespt NI Nell Isf) Ntioop4 Mtsidentisl Eleetrie tiSAting fialaets IS1l i1LMprQt Nt filed NecAiesrf ed 4alp"at I4146 NLMOW tewetrcial. Industrial. one Institatiwl Isis 0110" Canvefore and Converted &"iowea* Liglitisf tiote►ea IS11 Mulor" lwdoettiai lracbs, tractors, trailers. sd Ib41 N1NOpO •eiticalar LigAliaa tpip/a+at StseRere Still NLc01pQ Media • television Nrceivtag •gets $141, Niitlp4f Neeleiwt tools. Nkta1 Batting MilNto" Pkeaagroptn Meeerds sod pre•teeerdrs Maen.oie Tad. r. IS4t NiilQlQ9 asetniot tools. sotat Famine 1662 W11" Wit and television Tronswitting. Signaling. and . I?+44 IILNt1lQ4 Sstci®t Mae one tools. Dit lets. teat OW selection ttaipstat sad Apparatus fietntte. we ladestrdot losses K14 Win" Smicandecters sed selste4 Devices 1%5 alum "Whist Tool Accessories i Nesserisg Dooicta 261S am" tleclroadc Capacitors TSt ltLttMip Mar SRiew tioad.tosts 1411 NLADM tlecttenic Coils. Trsesferoers. ass other ladvet.+ts , ISb! skjobw Metal etatbiag Meetaiat►r. NEC, 141• NtMPQ Electronic Ceepawtwts. KC . 1SS1 NIJMM� tteNt .leedecie ,00acMintrr INI NpW StataEe b/teoies tort tSEt.. "NllMtp f Iealils soibiaetl I611 Np Pr War Satisfies. Dry awn - YespaerRilt�,llecRit►esr- Ple Niter Vehicles and ►asseeser Car Salrte A.cesswries 1SSlE 1NaOt1p4�f p�ptt lnswtr�les tbrinieerr 1f14 1N.mwgw Nntso �rAie • carte and l ItSS #littMM1� Mswtiwg resits ildlcllisss: Mwe A yeipst. •:. 1114 NLW" tenter Maiwne .: IM NO bWw. Specab INwtew itpsAiatc .: NEC 1►tt 1/!6 MLteN'tl NUM1rQy Aircraft Aircraft taxi and Ewgiwt pares b6i1Sp1: 1�Sti1.;.., 1!'i�IttpQe 11ia000tt1t, sansa,oel pa*piog teipstet Nall �1ad Heiler_featiwgs 5 11:8 tlafyT Aiscseft feel• end Aus.t.esg t®aipwewl. Off, i see Mast* TotVe r Srscripiw. sic waste Tppaa bscrtpiw _... �sde Cale Ttl/ 4t$t lelotnPQr sbi Reildi and p tag syslelag 4511. T Ur Tean�puetatiaw. teriiliestN Grrie,rs lstt NtJ1" Rtae .amildieeg and :R*paieiug:.. .. taegiaeering. Scitwtifie. Labsratsq esd seutrcb 4M1 _ aSR1 T L1T Airport* .ad tifis!A Fields Airgett terminal Service* left tl0M " lwatromrols •- Aureastic Central* for Regmistiag Msideetisl ale 4612 4611 JRLM JRIPTf Crdr ►etroleve Pipe lines RetewN /rtrtlee,m Pope Lions NYt Caeearrc$sl tnuireomenta sad dlppflasees 4610 ALP? Pipe Lines. WC lwdastaial ttestvwwate Dar oratories. NOP167, and 4911 LT T*lephoa* Camooftication (Wirt of Rsdiel Control of ?retest htiablet. and #elated 48I1 Lt Rdie sroodcaatinp 3114 tNst{t� Pradecto t#lsfising Plaid litters and Cesmtlord Devices 4911 4911 LT T te,lrvision RreadtestiaR ti*ctric Services , SITS WLMDPQ loo4r»seoto for tttasurieos and testing of 4911 T Electrical a other Services SRlV ttaJ111PQ Electricity and tlectrie signets 4411 T cam a other Services "it 111tw ttesseckv and eontrolliag Devices, IMIC 4919 T Cambiestiou Wtilities. N[C 1D.1 Q Optical session to aid Lewitt Goss V sewr"s, Spstras surgical sad leafiest Instrowats sal Apparatus 49S) T Re,fss* S®Does 1R4P sLek14�Q Orthopedic, Prttt"Ale. and sorgical Applisoces Gist AM sawitu' Services. Not sodSopplies Wit MI States Cquipwet and &"lies !NI-SIN:WOMMU TRAR[ NtJIQ(t ophthalmic Coeds ]fit 1Pr1 ellJw" "wesecopbic Equlvent sail luppike 3193 1 !crop a Waste Welotisls. Weleeele pot NUOMQ 111JODPW llatcbee. Clocla. Ott. SI41 L►R Chemicals sad Allied Pridtcts Wholesale "Ire Ilt,tlw" Jeaelrf, Precious Mete! SNI A Foes Suppli•a "IS silverworo. rioted Wsr*. sad statute*# steel Mart !iN JRLT fsiats. Vsr4ishvs. and Sgplies ex'"DPQ Jev*trr'e tiadisgs ♦ N/tetlsH : LNibep Man Soil OJNeJblQ Congo" Jewelry and Cootuue Novelties. escape S211•59": MAIL MK co Precious mass AV(ea ttlR t'Q NeNlts, Pies, ssdt sal ties, and liellor 3:11 JRLt Mine. glass. sod Wallpaper starts "91 ifIdRumpll Netias►i Signs and Adeertilial Dlglags S:SI S1tl AJRT JRLV sordaare, Slogs %*it# Nov* Dealers l"S NJRtJs" Rorial Cashel# Sill Mimi! Rvperew"s Stores 1lVT NJRtJ10P#�tT leaoe.taeterieg lNgasteits SH' AIJRt Niscellaoeass "metal leerebandise, Stares - Gail-:fSt?e TfaAaSPORTATIaIt AN! " L1C 11"UTtss SSII LlWT letter Vehicle, Dval*rs INw a Rseds atilt MIT sal/fads. Llwe-gaol Operating SS21 SStI LPWf LeW Nato Vehicle Dealers /Wsed oaltl At/e a now $apply stores `o4ttl Lf1tf taco$ a" labsrbas Transit SS41 LFW Csseliar Service Stations. Retail 449t1 1111TT switebias i Terelssf tstablislow"a SSSI On Reat S*al*rs 4tfV 9M twos toossteger ftesopsrestion, NEC, Wt MY Ilsttcefcle, Seolefa sill ' .#oil tm t#sicabs SSVV LVW1 Autamotive Dralaes. Ntt LM1r Intercity an# tlsrat Noshes lasssmgsr St'J ssesebold Appliance Stares. Retail alit LlMf Trs"pertstise MI LT Automatic Mercliewlsin� tlatbittV Operatic* at Is t School Soove ti►iweaatMte i lsrwk@ Facilities fee Notw %*let@ SNJ SN1 T T feel a ict Dealtro putt oil Seattle - AttT JltlJe#f ts#seeyve TranspirtiUvi laws Trucking without storage 5914 T Liquefied Petrol*#s Cos Sealrrs TtIS-Res/: all) AV" T.ottisg, :Ramp met 3tsv0Cts IolDtlt?tlt3 j j +ipf4 itll MOW SRP1B tarn' Tratkir slth'iterate Tt#caieg Tvrseiwal rscititie,! Ms LM Coin tlperseed taq. rie+ and set Cleaning 4111 JRLfteF s's`'twett! service,, le+pUtsit siiatswsuee, Owif/ 12I6 Plot in in Del CI►eniat Plants. facere tat Cleaning e;arprt awl orheltertt *all �44hS iMrrg 16*a #04440 Tetessp#rlatitM fi1A LN inda•teial Lanwderves TN ?4 - ' ' aRl ltf Cater► tiaeedlimg Wetee iraispirfitillrD' li�w ieNo R11t tJ41 !fit LT lint rtwerol Service* and Crematwries Autdwir A/arlesiwg Srtvues _ jsic 1laute T*pro lrecrlAtisA fib 1lsrtt T„ee litocriptles Fitg sit Aleertieieg, rtc FFt1 tJ[ liraet M/il "vertifies forvicee MIl•N,o• lttfettuKoos its; FlFP EAT 4teT 21aepV601 ant PbstxNFing services CeeesreieE PMtap/ephp Ant, �i hooks kll AL" pwsrne eN Aft Geltwiea !Ka ACA eisinlocties aei asters:sstiss Services Nli Aft ANerete. Mtswkei awA taetegieel GNewe loiewti Gat 400reteeeisl Pao Pat elosniag MW %sieteneace services to tiwlllegs nicaetiwl. eq2 Nt 111sreeeo/cial adoestl sel eeA 114101 LPT MA Attrr Soilitge• 09C e� K ons fereieH, KC ■roopeeh sd-rrwlopo"t Lsbscatnrles !!!4 OPOST Ptetoriwistiog'teberetotIts T"T !"V LPT commrreist,Testing Uboroterles Fire tatio"isbor Ckereles %role*$ !$ta Lwr Paeee1011e9 Cat Bristol sr Lessime, whapow iF4*fre F!t P L1t1T Tract Mstit . a" Leooles. oitboat drivees F#lg S." nulls? Trailor anal tkcreetiMe/ fNiels tteAtei LOW Top a" aeey "i►;$bW. &W~ice Flaf Les tits Retreading sad Repair Ne". Aetesmadve F4PS F!!6 LPV LmT Point Shope. A•t~iwe General Astowtive ar"If mappe rsif Pot€ LmT LPt Asteostive Ne" r Ws"o. Iltc oaths t Television repair 11epe FtlP LPF the/tigerstise • Air ceolitiosiaf feteito • tiAT vg$1 LPT sepals, Stops taeitricst 8 flott"Mit ttepslr flsgs, KC LT Watch. cloct. a" lewlev Upair •n l8b/ J:LB reephntsterg and Parsltoce "ir !at" LPV Welfiwg Repair tst� LT Arsotere Iterisaiag !bars la96 LT "it 1tb•po and Boosted Services, tttC t isetalinf TomWersistea veto L" seeriees Allied to ft4 ise ►ietete hsdaetles ' Fla! ALT Tteetticai Preowere itseept 1letion Pletwes) end -.., Ieiseellswesao "Wetciest services Foot ' Art Public Calf caerses Ffo# LPT cois-gersted Aoiraoneet ftviees F1�elr .1[LPT AageArst Parts liFo AA Anvernest and 11"restion Services, tRC tM�ka LPT Control Molest sod Sergicol "last@ LPF Specialty lleepitsfs, esctpt hvehistrie Mfg LPT Wiliest La"retesive - for? LPT rrstat LaMrpaorioe Intel LPT "Obliswt Cafe facilities ei11-011- EDUCATIONAL NOTION i#iIt !RilPT tlesewtory and s sad ry Sebools KC • list eliietiere elssoltied 1kaJi ?�tiwT t�ltesee, 111ei,i[eoitiet, ht®legissal feroele. o alstPl� awl Junior Callegra - rasantiewei vqieels, aeeegt'Vocational Bight sch"It. NEC t#aeo ltRiPt scheae swp Edecetienol services, INIC , 111 A LT .Eat+ Training and eeeoiienal "habilitation Serviees< � . ;`,,.� 1flC-• fled vlsrw#.ert tiofriloe# . w t t�Ri tStit Sol forte free, eat for resodamtial ties. �twarle sM.• KremgipMlt �. Gwlsrw aawctw ftlgww• I Fboweiamo Pafc'hw Ime loner# select l 1lam �essfwa tooAow "tors �ipsSepAeawln ss►lem OO (Florida Jetare acafeeolles oiaearamdat ' c1wry PalmFes' ISO e9 egews ISeafr®tAfa iRsres sJt/lcicofe tSoatloarm petal �. rid cater/ 1lrllgiolem�w P"Ch"Ver+es owertlwrts ft1KA►tAar petal farrya ttt/aE4 frMeeodl Oaarees alrgimfma ttive a*, - teMrstrowla Indices /@aM.NlrtleD dQliepAore ywgl• Iliad talsmcalsrfe rya job,% rlrMel brow) wsys4oM� state (Royal Petal 'Ibrstw�s ticarfa trtersre (coltlteareal retie tCoAN, royal plat tieeels tfcests Valet Safi Nlm tto mobegs pale) Ucwls app•• lticasle Valet Sere rNams IS" Palmetto) -� o tysltewe @ ei►aeamt l s f wf f 1 M 1 sear s IM►oMa lteaea (Paradise tree/ tyslloae 16110114M twit) twsrondi • SalNamis manes", /1494 tndlas wwHAars iaAa�•+esls /wild ditty) �tiogM,yt Toasts Kvemtees flees f ir941eAedeA foaeldisstmra ttwtlel of good) t"sla MIIldes INmA tr Ktse iitorod9• tom) um I, heal low#**" Indices f India Mfh ice ca•lest: iSoslltart, op Idf TOWIndl t"Inalls c ws ITropfcaf Itir/cta,ae►la saateatar t Jarlisalees also") TAoe•w$ tA0r111 twadlw sewassO Fbe4spAarsa tarp• tVeliaa Mlmele t TMe9pasle 010110meme lFlwtle tram. seaside a pi plans cla"a Ise" VIM, Women morrosf/ Otoy$ thato Pale) �Imrs Ifiatlf tSiasfa *lest "room Waltlo►e ITAeocis vote) ' 3` Piwos atBlpti! vet, earf�re t Ilap Blast► �lMt 1lirlmas rarlsfa rlaariq )hate f h Date) �4 ' Rlsclda pt9cl tat l dolreodf TM►Iman said. /%etch Pala) a, r'19wmle lottotle liltQltyt 'Mesh1whew r e tlk�s 1 A eg/om beta/ s RE1►: • faMic sprC'l�s JhiI 1 �i SArels. •lees. sad cars motes SM. 1Sporol flog) ' Olssge tbecet AKebewese Irelse erslhl . fier arse viscose Iye►relsh load Acelyphe hlsytdes tt7Mselflo plWtt Oa leyo Wel i lehl i MIA bell 1 - Aesiyples eeE/MoslswN IGb/per1sMNt` `, ErMfAwnr erwosMs (also Segel ' Atoeesie spiv. fro~ Bert Esgsole �erlitris IM�ffo sfapperl At/leis sP. Isbell ffeeert ' Eossele coals, flood berry) Aeeeeelesrs tteerch view) tupelo fostlde Ispeelsh stopoWl Ardisle f>Meto febrlston be", ftets repole Myrtoldes ISpMIS% stopper, -ASWVO to. 649erges fsreel Ferostlre sogrowe If IorIN prlwetl go"els $pp.e Ifleu bowls, GerNels JosleolNss ICsreNelo) 9 imrAse recsreets Itbey-hli/ ;': - Gespirs, discolor Igloolyl tlo"Olewlliso gM• loteewollteet IIMIIs Fit"$ IScsrfet11000 tlnMalll theres I cAlsw preeoriM (Matter fly Iloilo foressele oetiocolife tsebsffferet IlsdreAtoo flower hello. folly) Syr~lae IeelN ltoces4Nrry1 1lsdyeAlels SPOOorioeM litetelll filly) celtieMre hee�atoeopMfo I�1ladorpeff/ _ MOdye*IM on. Iasler folly) colt fcorpo "M few* tharoese Neerfy/pol flslo"twe dl®illls ISsseA saeullo.er/ c ow#$ redieMse ttrewpst •lost .. 0ll619eM 1'O!e'sleseslse 1NI�Iscvs) e mle 10.9 (COssls) tlpmeem:etlls Iotlfofose iSptdr filly, Gssle IbeAsosrslss (coss000 flies �1MM ICellteorryt Clr"Ools"s /Coco fOsceylow) Its wsl9orle eaeM tOwrf yow" Aolfyf t:fediele Iseeyresst opens" spp. 1ltsroleg glorles. reliro" .lee/ f eleeeo Ver101pwfews tt)natsel Ire IrsetMscMs IMrsh elder) 5 pes terectes iGreen bstfoeaeodi bk�cer s , two Imbricate ISOOCO st Owsh t•Ielrrl €emerp arocters s.�rie"M isitwr iell0e40 I JK golei• &OTOesls IJoe+aoe) ry L ...-... .. 1 :_:_....,..._-.. -_.., -. .-. .. .-. .. .........,:.-,«h...........F_.,._Je._...ta__a3u�.taL�:.ds.�.YS..._,..tiv.,rt'�..qr.e�..a_.._..s._.r-..•.;.ve.._. ._..._._._._. .,. .. _. ....�..:•.rr�_.......... 1j;...,,^div� 24�Si•L&,±n,.,>:..,.,.._irr`:�..si..r'.�1ri.a%�....3 v._.t::.vy.,x,._�.,-..�.d{r��t�C+>:y�s1... .. .r..,.�..v..z .-.Y..e JetrtpAe aNretl/l!M ttir•Eriral w•Nit aealeete (bMla. MAIN Indian Mutt � Jwiperw cAlnwsls calwarlN IJwI/erfl - -. Ilpaesle sepfwt►leaalls IDarllnl plwl . Jwlwes conferees (Share Jenlper) Sellttarle IArreehaN$ towstrowle Indices•ICrape•Optlel Scawet• olwl•rl Ilokbwrto tents" dspassa IDWI I80110"1 selryes IlelreshD istt!#N w "tavlleesle /Deere Isntw/ sepb►a f(a•ntese I"Whlsce pw lltestrw tpp.s BRrl.etl stenolablw stanse Ivellar elders ` ltrl ` ape *more (ltlly fares $•rune eerlth• to" ceders 110rclwsrae thes traa ISImpsan slopped! t•eaterle eapen$ls (Cape Aofaetsechld Mpclarte cattlflares (JahotleeM1 teeodlw I(.jtr•ssI �c -r, tepees ceritere (So there go wptle" !Meryl tatoMsrle capwsls tc"e honets•chle/ ,`• -- flasok olepls bastemlersis (!stem tarn? tstrsepte Neater 14etratygle, West Indiw Ile•/ � - COW - Japalcess IM�nda : lressl th•eaarlle erectas Is<legs • MwtIN plheraets ohe•mmltolea Mow siN .. thaelfarlle spp.s (Clock wines ' ;_- Nrfr•a rotesttts• (plea•°s •resthl thtrallle ltsaea I4hyraltis)t!w trschalesparaw JtwlnolMss IConlederate Jasnhe$ �hseaewa^ls spetiosas 14oreh ! I s it ._ _ t�hllo""Orm spp.t Mellow. phlledandrwi UNe(e /wtcalsfe ISO* oats$ Pie" •II Wfee wwleft donee IDS" ceonty !leas `.. tlMra•n sesp••sws IS"dwAve volowew1 ►IthaeellDw l.edsl•pe�eses (llatMraaw recce elephwtlpas Ispl•altss t•ccal t - Plwerfa sets. IFreullpwll twle ftarldena Mantles l scerp•s spp.s ipodecarp•ss fenthe■tlw tear• Ivied Ihel Attsc es Is•ttoerswes t%lfw wratlel .. ebnfederla ft"Icherateeedl .� ' - i�syrhofrto Alrsass ivied cofle•1 1tEa t E■oHc sKcles i r Sowte! . SItMC N EXHIBIT 4 lr PROPOSEDb. iNTERim TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS A. PuPont Plate ImMovomehft I SE 2hd Avenue.end SE 3rd Street Adjust vest curb an pub Ile I and On southbound approach and adjust traffic signet heads as required, to create four versus present three southbound thr6ugh Ions. Lane drop to be seedy accomoodsted south of Intersection within enls+lng povemen+ through left turn at elsesyne liouleverd Way prior to BrIckell Avenue bridge approach. Modify signing and striping throughout "Olon as reciulrod. 39 tad Avenue and SE 2hd Street Adjust chennolizo+ion curbing in southeast corner to provide two wstbound through lanes and throe separate loft turn Ions, plus one free flow left turn Iwo Inside w4dlf led channel lastlon Wand. T" t , fit i')M -of the left turn Imes for access to 1-" entrance roRp near, SE and Avenue end SE 3rd Street. one waWator V and am optional. Adjus""t of chennotizetion Island In southeast corner to also allow throe Sout%bound through lows, -trionsItloned through Intersection with skip guide 11nes. (One mandatory right turn tons and two through canes currently In place.) 4V Revise signal toad displays, pedestrian features* overload and other sIgnings and pw~t omrklmqs�os, roavired . 104 m...11, Yk 44 r, "am 11 1. aid i tt !1�yne Plate project Entrance Entrance and exit drives to be eoordlnated with ultimate bifurcated ramp design and City of Miami Publis Works Deportment. x. fAK Sowetric alterations at project drives near Biscayne xGr Boulevard May and Biscayne /eulevard May. This Is to " include revised drainage as necessary@ outside 1� pavement widening within exists rl ht of way, si nallsatlon of exit drive to be installed when warranted, and revised pavement markings. Also ✓ ?;4 HIfN" : provide custom material and construction for 4 approximately IMO feet of sidewalks -along project street frontage and riverwalk frontage* and all jsk sest ing• i t ht 1 Ie g �. and ' l and seaptng. all for public Uses Biscayne Boulevard Mav Access ibadway City to preserve present public right of way for ,soperate tb® eaetbound access roadway soutti of Biscayne Bouleverd Way to extend from SE 3rd Avenue to BISC*Vhe Plana project South vehicular traffic entrance. Preservation to extend at least to dots of MMpletlon of project Lase 2. (Separate access roadvoy not downed pessary to project phrse 1.1 105 I M r ... . T • , _. e. .. - _ 1. ? `.S.^1..-:;.�p.2.r.. t. ri. .. .. , t,pr.{'i, �1... I Avenue City seeks approximately five feet of additional right of way within this block that Is necessary to create three westbound tones, an addition of one travel low. At the Miami Avenue Intersections this Improvement would allow a separate left turn lone, a . ..... "XI $operate through Iwo, and a separate Iwo used as a combination through w4 slant right to the 1-" entrance romp. SE 2nd Pro@+ between SE 1st Avenue and SE 2nd Avenue Oster roadway plan calls for three travel lanes within this seeflon of SE 2nd Street* to be constructed within existing public right of way. (Two travel laws presently provided.) EXHIBIT S PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND PHASING ` a. • =1 Office• Commercial (Sq. :._ Hotel (Sq. Ft) Rosidential* . . Miami Canter 791,000 63A UnIts 969297 0 '& ExlstinQ 689,000 S.F. 91scayne Plaza 700,000 0 1609000 60 Units - Phgse 1 120,000 S.F. (Incl. podium) ;1 91scayne Plaza 780,000 0 609000 90`Untis a' z+ Phase 2 R If the market is unfavorable for construction of the 1S0 residential units, the•Appticant will construct the 3009000 square feet as office space. SOURCE: ADALIE - .. . .. , VJ- ._ a_._. -- ... t,-c._i� tr_ _m t4 -.n w&..mY. �e 3ai.s:s•�e7'St�L�r,.&it'?'SUEL' EXHIBIT 6 STATt OF FLORIDA SLtc!!•C�•gS DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS omsiox of RtsoURCt FLAMNG AIM HM ZNT SURM OF LAND A= hATLR MANAGE.':SNT 2572 Vnecutive Center Circle• Rast °. Tallahassee, Florida 32301.8244 (904) 488.4925 subsection 380.06(16), Florida statutes, places the responsibility on the developer of an &;proved development a:: regional Impact (DRI) got submitting an annual report to the local government, the Regional Planning Council, the Deparss:e:.- of Community Affairs, and to all affected permit agencies, or. date specified in the Development Order. The failure of a. developer to submit the report on the date specified in the w development order may result in the temporary suspension of tLe Oevelopaent order by the local government until the annual t`;e:t so submitted to the review agencies. This requirement applies to L all Developments of regional impact which have been approved since August s, 1980. tfyou have any questions about this - xa re aired nf report, call the Dal eorcement Coordinator at, (5^.t; s 41 4l25. Please send the original completed annual report to•tbe �R designated local government official stated in the develop-...e-: order with (2) copy to each of the followings a) The regional planning agency of jutisdictionw aA, b) All affected permitting agencies: c) Division of Resource Planning and management Bureau of Land and Water Management 2571 ssecutive Center Circle, Bast Tallahassee, Flosids 32301ep Please format Your Annual status Report after the format esa�le provided below. AM)AL STATUS at"" Reporting Periods to = ltoatb/Day/!teat MonthlDay�eat Development: - Nam of Diu Location: , City County Developers razes ' Company Rama Addresss� street Location City, state, tip Code y� 1. ide Page Two is Describe any changes made in tbt proposed plan e: development, phasing, or in the representations contained i+ th• Application for Development Approval since the Development Of Regional Isrwpaet received approval. Please note any actions (substantial determinations) taken by•local government to add:ess. these Changes. Motes It a response is to be more than one sentence, attach is tshibit W a detailed dasciption of each change and copies of the modified site plan drawings. tab1bit •A° should also address the following additional Items if applicable. - a) Describe changes in the plan of development or phasing for the reporting year an0 tot the, subsequent years:. b) State -any known incremental SRI applieations for t development approval or sequests for a substantial deviation determination that mare filed in the reporting yesr and to be tiled during the nest year= e) Attach a copy of any notice of the adoption ofi development order or the subsequent modification of an byy adopted development order that was recorded the developer pursuant to Subsection 3t0.0i(li)(d), rose 2) sea there been a change in local government jurisdiction for any portion of the development since the development order as vissued? if so, bag the annesin local government adopted a mew Development of Regional impact development order for the project? please provide a copy of the order adopted by the, aaneslot local government. 3) provide copies of any revised master plans, incremental. site plassse etc., not previously submitted. notes lit a response is to be more than one or two sentences, attach " tsbibit 03.0 4) trevide-a summary comparison of development activity = proposed and actually conducted for the reporting year. Rsemples number of dwelling units constructed, site Improve manta, lots solde acres mined, stoss floor area constructed, barrels of storage capacity completed, permits obtained, etc. notes It a response It to be mote than one sentence, attach as tgbibit `C.• S) have any undeveloped tracts of land in the development (other than, individual single -Easily lots) been sold to s separate entity of developer? If go, identify tract: its sit** and the buyer. Please provide maps which shore the tracts Involved. tract lWyer notes It a response is to be sore than one seatence, attach as ftbibit OD.`' d) Describe any lands purchased of optIOMA adjacent to the orlgiral Development of Regional impact site subsequent to issuassce of the development order. Identily such lard, its size, and "ters4110 age on a site plan and map. Notes It a response is to fee :rote than one sentence attach as tzj%&bit ot.• `S.. ... ..;s x„+•,,.?'. e:u+.. _ _ t=_ .n�, r:�-•..g_.��.,: .�...s .tea;,,: .�.. ,�., �3 ..z. � g�„c� �.�k.ar _.3.....s.,,..t�.M — t 0 . : Pale Thtee • 7) fist any substantial local, state, and federal permits which have been obtained, applied for, or denied, during this reporting period. Specify the agency, type of permite and d_ty <. got each.: Motes If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach as tahlblt °y.• 0) Assess the development's and local Government's car- n tinning compliance with any conditions of approval contain*_ in -; the 8AI development order. Rates Attach as tshibit °G.' Me attached form) y g) Provide any information that is specifically required by the Development Order to be included in the annual report., >: 30) Provide a statement certifying that all persons haw* Men sent copies of the annual to It in conformance with 4 Sssbsections 310.06(14) and (li). S. Person completing the questio»naiies .y r u Title: s� Representings ' a 110 g, a.. Fe,'.s. '�&. "y �.3t _.t:� x.+t'e.L, �r - .._ '1 ;:# iih ..5lam.c:;u�i.3s'__..hs:ht.t -j,—:k.�::.xsi??'v.�'[ �2e+w..ia1Y•., .•r.8'�2" _- ,,.n..,yu,�, ,3= _ �.,. PHASE 1 # Firs GSF BUILDING SIZE: Ph 1 & 2 Building Base Mrs prking 800.000 Mrs retail/entrance Ph 1 Offc/Resdl/Retl Tower 39f1rs 780,000 Ph 2 Offc/Resdl/Retl Tower 1 - - Total Tosser & Base 49flrs 1.580000 Number Of Parking Spaces 1.200 EF4TS 1lTf4A i40O _ PHASE 2 # Flrs —USF rr�3b uw �- 6/1/85` _ TOTAL COMPLEX #-Firs Mrs prking 800,000 Mrs retail/entrafte -« - 39flrs 780,000 51flrs 1,020,000 51flrs 1,020,000 61flrs 1,020 000 2,600,000 600 potnl(#) 1,200 plus 600 potnl( Office 30flrs twr 600,000 39flrs twr 780.000 69flrs 1,380.000 Mrs grdn 100.000 - - Mrs 100,000 Exec Resdl Apt Suites(*) Mrs twr 120.000 Mrs twr 180.000 15f1rs 300,000 (60 Apts) (90 Apts) Retail/Cmrcl/Restaurant Mrs twr 160,000 Mrs twr 60,000 9flrs 220,000 Mrs base Parking/ ing/Service Mrs base 600,000 - - I Mrs 600,000 Total Tower & Base 9flrs 1,580,000 61flrs 1,020,000 ' 2,600,000 +1� SITE SIZE: 130,950 130,950 Note: It is present intent of developer to construct a total 150 executive residential (rental) apartment suites. However, in event market conditions are not favorable. developer # reserves option to convert some or all into custom office suites, with no resulting increase in project's or towers' total gross square feet. #) - W&Co site purchase agreement with HCJV gI�ves Project right to lon -term lease 600 spaces in any parking built on any of MEN s adjoining 3 Dupont Raza blocks. .. " .. ... .. •.. .,. -z- ;a , r..:>.. �_. .. _� :- . � ,.--. sees.. ,. , ... .,:.: �. . . ,::... -..' ,.. .. sees • ,.. _ _ sees. � :. :,- • r _ :. _ � _ - - - :.: .. ...:... .. ,sees . • �, sees , - - c. ... -sees. . " ..,. :. �t.•. .,. lrl�/ il.le fWtlla 110'�MIdOlIr11R'. fr la Ntsi-ft er.aeceiai hrtiy r r,. others QsteMl� `rri slts i fore �. R.1 i at CN1• �'� 019100 T'k\ !less (M•) per-1 ;iN� N IL r A 1 " ` ilq�ts= -0- -II- $34 wilts 00,000 i.iH 701.ON its il0/ ng _ N awns -i- ✓ iN�IN i.l�OOo"� 700�ON �05i",°P' �e�as• 1107 - 1� EI*iea A120,006 l%86:68 1 dN Soto selre 1909 "Wien) gtetlm.ted ropelatiem - ,. �' 110-3t0.persomsl - � T , !lsoarso rises to emits �!� ✓ sO,eN, -0- : MISS 101pr same loge - -;. :^ .ees--• - mee.t 1991 !lease 3 ✓iNteei a.t.•►,�,n Z° g U 1, _ Slatimated ---`' ✓ 7 1 -Lw ' 1��1, population - _ 100-350 petse+asl Q s !�d!l1Le 150 units 63e emits 3060000 _ 2#359 2/371teN 300/009 s.to settees s.to sots "Was lestimated ' Total rapeiatieim 300-1Se ftcom msl 5 e110�lsv It is the intent at the developer to a matcoat a total of !Se resldsmtial tee stall a xsestiaee noetm ts. ; fa mreto In the went; thst the Packet reaction is satevotable, the, develepr caveries the-40 " tar, e:omvett soaker all art rile eomidestial .sits lnW custem 6filao seltes with so resulting mates" In the lCsjeat's total. Icon square teatAft .i r *' M G f �.r-.. 'a:� �.,��!.-, .i,-,. ..: _. .. :,- _.,._ .. ,. �,1A•,. w seer �.,, .' ..:sees , .._ .- .. ., -: ,: :. .. .. <: ..�;- .. . .., :. e:. i. `�.£q c:,�ti�. ��n'��. , ..� wnC., e%F �'4. f �ii,?YF!?f�.�?��t.'.ir`M'+`k�iidi'!�:i�:v�?t5(A,�idE�arµ'�:•.•_, a,�c ,Y.•.. _ .. .- .. .. . . _,..._... .. :.�_ .,r�r< if Yiew To North 1 southeastRlnancialC_ er--,,•'.F�.` �,..., Edward Ball Oltice Building Ni�attl/®tel l OnoBiscayno Tower miami convention Centel ..• 1-03 To Al! Rb^s.s_ _ K Biscayne Blvd.WIWI Pavillon Notel r ture Rouse .;_oysiiddee Specialty Complex o-®`Yre woguchi Redesign Baytront Park Gc!a P4-?JSA V4184- -rtevn "t �- I* a S I r f T 1 i I } B! SCAYNE PEAZA MULTIUSE COMPLEX MIAMI, FLORIDA WIRTH t CO. INVESTMENT BUILDERS " p i L 1 Z�Z ee - �aKlia• G�? T�� hob+t� EU =-Z. 520 aneWl Key 0"" Ta:13051381.e9S5 SuM 1204 Mums, FIpnW 33131 7b: Hoeorable Planning Advisory, Hoard Ju na 4, 1986 City of Mia�d. Re: Wirth & Co's Biscayne Plaza Gentlemen: Project ADO Approval Wirth & Co as Biscayne Plaza Project Owner/Developer and its national Development Team are deeply obliged for tZr=shown to their 2-year $400 Project private work effort and their ail quality by'this.Board and all public officials to date in the complex approvals process. Relative to Board approvals action, following is Wirth & Co and Project's f respectful reooamendation: (1) WSCo and Project, as Miami citizens and despite then record -high and onerous burden, can and wi1 1 accept the Applicanta.: Edaibit B ADO which . inCorporates by intent all of the SM a> mdmously-approved 18-0 MI Maections, all of the MI fair alu�ra contributions, all the DRt awl ie res ct on sae Project. prop o , WWo saqutrenents (IItt Requd reamts) otactly as written, wi�io+it wordira dwees or eaaoations whatsoever. Since ramerats are y most onrttius or au level`s,' this tr Is a song dsxnstratian of �Co ' and Project. good faith. (2) In aggregate the SFRPC DRI Regtaireo�nits repreasnt t'he t level.of restrictions, axactians, and contributions for major bulliiistory Of downtown Miami.. These MI R re ants scoop act as a c�tIi are also materially hider then of new budl the Project moist =Veto an costs a�—i' , H*tMqvfu�mt Enter than Cettrust than MLOML center, tda�n dowanoo�an. They an ust barel ooverable in Project: budgets as -is. Angthiang�addad on top of #RWEy &s=y the Project by mddM it aeon-w� tit ive. (3) Tiae teal RequirmnNn— were unea�u�sly approved, evalsy si�g1e =Heber Of SFR@C incl Mayor of Mind. after vans$ y and rejects higher staff is as excessive and veewrkay . This level of DRi its MU tmaniml as mac aceasocaabl all the is of soda t were not to a or MW cx�r at enactment, or tly. (4) two and Project have volunteered in ®ood faith to �cx:ept all EEM lie oust • Requirements other Mad City-requestedit4Ach for our internal accoundr-g of camb on of which 5.5 million of Pro ect to t A), (5) To more on of this all®time lfc cost men in the form of non- area new new res as the Placed M-04ftuni- AM s east It iA ly di t vie a r3ia ela oft its soarer buildix tlt its costs and its loo ttg of and area driv�ern out of line.and it can not car te. Minced wiawid'bar`'tdie fixnsn l �.ty as arbitrarily discrindmtirg Est raw �, W. iumumt, raw employment, with a hostiles Sacred it can Mt be O �t yyp k '-"Ok (6) The Planning Department additional and non-DRI required public burdens and restrictions lWosed on the Project in their Planning Department ADO,and the reasons they are uraorkable and in aggregate destroy the Project,are outlined, iteow-by-item, in Exhibit B. Rec omnmdation (1) %Co and Project respectfully request that Applicants ADO, which includes all SFRPC DRI Requirements unchanged and all Planning DeparUmt w=kable additional requirements, be approved by the PlwrAx g Advisory Board, this Project to with extremely high but as allowing world -class proceed reasonable and workable public cost burdens. (2) A vote for the Planning Department ADO is quite singly an official vote to create an unworkable, uazfinanceable, and discriminated -against Project that can neither be financed or built. It is therefore a vote to kill the Project,: and the $400 ndllion potential world -class investment in Miwi.f Res Su dtted. Wi � Co Investment Builders Russell D.L. Wirth Jr. - managing Partner 2 fj t t s.!_r_..:, 7-7- tV EXHIBIT C Southeast Financial Center And Centrust Fair Share 195 Ramp Loan Financing Per AnnvnvaA rin EXHIBIT D Mayor Suarez Letter Of Project Support And Former Mayor Ferre Letter Of Project Support EXHIBIT E Traffic Data EXHIBIT F Geological And Soils Data .�O�oY,'r��1 (�•bl:� C.:} i3,►n4,n On .._...._.. .. W+�C. Z�,+.�O�F�.��•� ;' �YNciuo�c �+��, aPC, ORt AH® At-� WOILY fatic (" C1os� , �1`�•5c b1t a V^ ���+srcCclak� r.b1:c, �•n�Ch+ +(rer. let 'Tow Qr.•.L:i `1�ir'sgl'1, `14t-14gw' �t�6ir-I�cl� it. clo jow �K'sr4 � ir:et�L R,arW�lN� h`� •�`K 3-Yew : G,�•�� � QR • C�u�ti,a ��� .1�o Qcjw►• �+wc, . �', C QCtr� R ►\ Q e• It t. k t rn<c: : Zn wou CF �1��Su�+JI.. (xcr�c+►,�pa•kz '�1,'�io �1'i� p.rco^� el�`•�. Ace, Sr`'K•1M ., 'TAGG:c Z,c°tr�lrenrt�^is CQrs�c�L (�e\rw+1�w� 10�`�� Cc CeSi• +.V r � SctRdl.' c, $ OA•L . WA. (; Vows l A koa S+bi.1,\ Gcf1n ow%k24 C5.) .Lo�us"Co P�b�.'c PY��=yes �To F,rtwt P�1a►.c Sa} Fwwh .QheNu.ct. Nc, p,,,,',t•,t.t� pg 11���1,t • c SYr• .rah ��„� — �5 �a�l + .a�,Sa"t 9-t-VAc ' No QrO Uk Qh:. Ca `Ik) QN�ts�e p,,Gc� � ,1 �-Qv rs Pro)ah ko� cf-c— (v► Al '�-55 � Goti..�,t, (,O�y,MA'.en (,Oa.I Par�Z.t C.JLS i�:we� �c�•.,,� t'�+.sw A� :.u°L. . WHO t, w '•.b•T•�1 ✓.ru via a 0 low r1e +1tkiti 9 A NIf��� ;r r ix or _� �.�:i4u >11..,� _..��'-..•.. .,. ... .. .4,.e l .,-4...J�F: 4.GC.�a., iiil �"al•_iv..J.0 _ _ Alm Gnr�a�dnc i X, �C•r�re� 4 �.'�11R6r�3° lf<r�f�ENtE TM 'Pok�+g / �S1t•� rAr+ ��,rnktslc alarv� • A�ttr, P�,�,w 'PM = �§�,� �, .4 tsar+ v.tMktr. �, t�l+il�. lt� �;�:r,.., �\et�n5• ce3�. ' � t�r�*rrh�;. `;, oral` cyl,1 itis.rt, Ar w w— %le! (io - E\(C\t f�,� q.�eas er+j \eOr10 COL& R11�1e°► - �(Q\�r,n1• ( �\'9b,� ' C. A(�,er� \ye ! M►. C;rrlr+.ws \l�.�,R:td� b� fovs� jl+s fwft @vim w�; f;caarr Ll4f�. �iliwa' t N(L1ad�Kt+j i FOQT C"4 am ' rr P 1 Suva 6tcc•�t Pl�v as su(trt,"�o0�tr •1.� �i� oe VD G.e- P<`O,rb 2. f'+ V*t&v4rtf • p{tt:cu a'A rv1 ul-At ODA ik 1 i Nttet��+wl►• or, totn\ stiw" tly W'{" 00I& 0pk 00f, tt1riCUA, `y i1S CR!"pS10 vJ1VG A'ct%''- &\\a%- VORA �,hi•i.3r�tAi ht3•.yerr�•t= ►^,� P - Nf(Aant syrus s -4Wn F:vs ;: jIdr,, "i R%,ggto - f4tvu e�+.+sir r,IN t ikver�. Q I �p NQ+aQl:r.1C OvfJ�l"rw.1r R�fJI ---s- SDK' Oft +� Cen1.wA ao; OvtttOkM C�i►+crel►} e� VnsntlN,IfO• � �S.'I,00� 4or tulu•1�Sht;t. Et1 pnira�\ 6rc�yt, ee(t►ttr•e.�>r,;F . R1•l�Q SEF�wz;►\ com .ttste�> ' I As �r+d�u•1�tk4 ( &tom\ eK4tl -N�M�W,, V-Jfp' Q�b1;c rjAft tt,.rwa'j Q"°S�•y< <.rs Un.�;��sNilk� ,n.►:a =ethr• F:r.r.� ,1 tvi;• N.�,Mrye�. eecvilvr� it (*•Ke N, ,. h� brM. (A111P.hr.�, MP �L�3/\ i p�r•k• f�• f�k=• i - 1 �i'1t.Mq � ynC,wartfatt.} P,'►'1 f: f t - NVUE" &yew �e+rl►• .•�, %* - Urw,;r,as Zdt.,\:ri.\ k. W ►�t\o - R�p\;�int Mot nw►�t - �Wxc 40 acpP�Qrih� gjlyll(�} Csb tilS, fa�Q� ter�lrvR 00, SEi V;IAK d Do, • !MnNr;=• to. � tI it''ri11.ta it Eesvl)Stik • Tetra i(1Ma�P h=attte,�y i �S�oi'1,oae s�. i..tt1 jsk�k *;(qtew� ff%.> R,hcS, �i (�6Gtc�e G,rwu.y . uw:r.ww.k, ZMf Rin�+t, ;F 4 Qk,Ma,t \.e,C Pok bean v*f,:oftA,• �� � �eslx Firwo Oub'1e11, 0... fc;.r o ai,%W, cs c".W1► r+o� ac►ws%4K ktttu Q1cn11to Age -X'At jktm S,"tAuk ��PTNN� 5 vo. Int lot,tAAS RAW t6 ZW,�3 Alt* qW OwAlot.Wilk #,,I� Iq k�tm A(V uoAlr accq.-j Iff-C41 its `Wtlk �?Wjotk ,r;Ko-ota Tum. WIT Iti mr(L. 0a ON `f :i t3 AMU►�,6,- C-1 F� The Applicant shall: She City shall: IS., Fund, bond, or provide a ibb. Insure that the required fted- lett•r of credit to the lag, bend or letter of credit County cad/or the irate for has been provided prior to iiTd, (in 1980 dollars) leaving any building perait for state and/or County con- -for the proposed development.. struetiom of surface street improvemests and $192,800 19. Ivaluate,'is collaboration (ia 1980 dollars) for re- with the Dade County Department aaaired D" modifications is of Traffic and Transportation, DaPoat Plan Plaprior to ob. the 'Dade County Office of Trans• _ taising any boildieg.permits %atlas Admielstratioe and for the proposed development. Florida DepartWOU of Trans- the recommended =atloe, options, eoatalaed ie the Report and Recommendations of the south Florida Regional Planning Council (Uhibit "A"), and any other options which may be feasible for. public sector • fiaaaciag (ld.i million In 1986 dollars) of the I-95 bifurcated' ramps to the Dupoot Plaza our - raft street syatw:_ and prdpart... • a report and reeoameodaticas, ' to be submitted to the Regional: Planning Council Dovatows De- `- vlopment Authority,- the .1Fetro- politan Piaaateg.Orgaadsagloso . ad Florida Department Trans• Of -..; ' portatlos for review and too Met vitbir son year of the date of tbi9, Detelopmeat Order as the•ppsseferred options rbicb should be lacludiAg. ! pursued, the steps secessary,to insure their rsalisatios so..tbat soa- stractloa may begin immediately .. after cospietlon of the Miami Avenue Bridge project. Coo- sidsratlon shall be given to • the increased ad valorem rev - eaves from Southeast Bank and Miami Center I (Ball Point) and II is funding these necessaryme improvents. 17a. n 32 so 7b. ]Fat issue a Certificate of n d11 ors of the coo- Occupancy for the project • z8S wnlsss a) tishy,�+r bi-furcated ramps by:AAWAMA s ! a) "®..,�•e er�rer! tR�� -..----- - --financial or b) other arrangeaents have bond been completed to finance WWe cooatruetion of the I_Y95 d bi-furcated ramps. The City shall also seek participatloo from Dade County in propor- tional relation to the set ss_an fiscal impact accruaiaq to for City and County from the eora- ""UPPORTI 1. .. .,- .v-1.-.��?,._.�,..x. .x, ...,.. �'!�. _.+_T.}. _x. _..ate,-k�d',1.�':"d. !.�i..�. ci'.�i::..r.,¢, U._-•.4,.. 4.a?.,:........,.._..., r: 11 f 1 Cs Diwel.tOn r Ninolity *altiCSPation nk�n i'�i�e " '. L S. Workwith the City to prepare a minority esploysent plan I"Icating Apse the maximum feasible number of Construction . and permanent jobs resulting from the project ban be &aces- sible and available to minority applicants# tspsCially Macke. 7. Vigorously seek minority Contractors, especially blacks, to carry out construction work as feasible, during the develop- ment please of the project. ' • Aeease and Cireulatied The Applicant and the City of Miami (in cooperation with County and State Agencies) recognise certain mutual responsibilities in resolving and mitigating access and circulation problems within, and in the iamedists vicinity, of the project. e " to resolvetYme.. pfroblaws s .�� 1�e�� �� � f • •,,.bY�4....^i SSnLLi • � M �..aa WAUt M Pond, bond ee provide a letter of Sb Oeasrs that soeass to the M. C credit to the City and/or the UN4th Street .ntwe CC eM to I-!S ramp cordtruction aedUMWItim Center . OAMOM win S,t. 3rd Street, S.Z. 1st Court not be Closed deairsp maw WM%-' and S,t, fth Street construction Lq . hours of the . world Usts meeessitatrd by trick access to Cant&r Scept for "WoratrueWan . the project track loaliesl bays an et tM I-M Daeetasse Disrrilaetar s Ss. 3rd Street. and Critical X%MLir CIE the Caxs- `` ventlon Center at other emasga*- !s S1sd, bat 4u ,rovide a lsttar of lb Ssaenstrua t S.S. land, Sad aasd wait to the City, County wWcw 4%h $1 It I s at the project pats - State for up to N16,000, in 1982 t meter and S.E. 1st Ave M to the. dollars, for oanstsvetion at City Center fins of the rivet-cf wy, &ndAw C=KT Ww"tid surface at the project bwhwtir. Me bgro "mots in the Mimi CID pry to obtaining any bail- I" posits for the praposad . so Iesam that the required Tads, bond or latter of erdit rewired da�relopunt. sppitaeat s eemufee sideraalk Sofcovaaanes in oandition 9a has been ided on t1w project paia utter In the prior too isaainq a bill pr- nit tom 6WelCP*It. &0oslts idsr!b'shall ox*ttLtuw as • . atf-setting Credit. Dar tend sue► nw. f1Club 20b , ' *O*old roarti.ficates ccCOctowicy a-M (cease .✓ Center oath : s : •JW timmi" p 0es,4 Via aenetaysc- is 00'" tted or Ow $3.31 million &I IM dollars, an an emlIF&RU-nift- frantsndad forma care VW . Mu a NOW to. the City by tM Applicant to coeditiea i0a, ��N.gr,pl�J�,F fig( fwP�llj-463 S- s . �� • `- ,.mom= .......:_._... .. ... , .-._. _ ,�.��._.^�, it .... .. w Ex,.,��c p • 1, L.itil of i. .-Moribn ;.lint ,•. - • • • O• MU iiOtO• xplea L. SUARtz -file- • Y,�YI. rLOwipA ii»>•OtO• ��� MA�pw sOf•Nf•AOO December 13, 1985 } ,~ Mr. Russell D. L. Wirth, Jr. Wirth i Company 520 Brickell Key Drive k. Suite 2204 Miami, Florida 33131 Dear Mr. Wirth: Wirth i Company and its development team are to be congratulate9 for: your confidence in Miami and the private initiative.you have taken in the development of Biscayne Plata, a $400 million mixed - use complex which will.be a world -class Miami landmark and the :largest in our downtown, located at the mouth of the Miami River in the heart of the city. Your willingness to collaborate closely with City officials has made our job of review much easier.and will, I am sure, result in an extremely valuable addition to this great international city. �The.City of Miami has always worked closely with the business and development community in furthering the development of downtown x Miami. In the J past ten year:, we have seen over 87 new public e anQ..private projects built worth in excess of $3 billion. Biscayne Plaza will be an excellent addition, bringing both } world -class quality and employment to our city. In reviewing your project, we note several elements which are of particular benefit to the citizens of Miami. First, Wirth i ,- Company's concept of mixed -use (residential and retail as well as .,. office space) will create a dynamic "urban village" and active -people-place in the heart of downtown. Becbnd, the Baywaik promenade, which you will build with private funds and will open for public use, will link Bayfront Park and the Rouse Bayside }' Project to our Conference and Convention Center on the Miami • River with a beautiful walkway, restaurants and cafes lining your x. project. Third, the scale and world -class quality of your development will make it a Miami landmark and potential rival to Rockefeller Center in Now York. Fourth, and certainly not least, will be the 3,500 direct and indirect construction jobs, and 10,000 permanent office tenant jobs, this project will generate, as well as added tax revenues for our city and neighborhood needs. Finally, for two years now, Mirth a Company has committed its private capital 100% at risk to this city -building effort and will attract $400 million of additional private institutional funds, all without seeking public financing, public subsidy or ' ' .public assistance other than reasonable approvals: an exc*llant example of ghat emp private initiatiive can do with City encouragwmant. t, . - .. .. Mr. Russell D. L. Wirth, Jr. December 13, 1965 Page 2 Due to its prime location, Biscayne Plaza is designed to take full advantage of our new rapid transit and "people mover" systems, which make our downtown one of the most accessible in America. Facing immediately on Biscayne Boulevard and with direct connection to the 1-95 ramps, Biscayne Plaza provides quick and convenient access to the'Seaport, Airport and key area hotels and businesses with the minimum of downtown traffic. The City stands committed and ready to advance the prompt construction of the I-95 "bifurcated" ramps into Dupont Plaza. This will, of course, require close collaboration with the State Department of Transportation and Dade County. Certainly, it is one of our highest priorities in improving transportation access to our entire city core. Funding is now available for construction and plans are 95% complete. As you advance your project through the various levels of approvals required for such a large building program,.please.be assured that the City will provide all reasonable cooperation.in ensuring timely reviews and legislative actions which will help you in the realization of this important project for Miami: I wish Wirth a Company, and the excellent national development.. team you have assembled, every success in the realization of the Biscayne Plaza Project. You have my whole -hearted support and the assurance that I will assist whenever possible in your. { efforts to sell :Miami to.the international financial and investment communities whose support, is essential for this creative -type of private downtown development._ fiery my yo OXavier L. Su rez XLS:nl w 1¢ -77777-7 Mr. Russell D.L. Mirth, Jr. } Managing Partner S ss .:N Mirth i'. Company 876 Balboa Lane Foster City, California 94404 1 recently had the opportunity to review your plans for the.exciting Siscavne Plaza project on Sall Point in Downtown Miami. The overall .quality of the architectural concept together with the unique water- front site will certainly make it one of the most outstanding developments In the Southeast. Certainly, it will enhance the further development of tall Point/Dupont Plaza and complement the Southeast Financial Center and Miami Center buildings. Concentration of additional world class office and retail space in the Core of Downtown will further enhance its position as the premier commercial center in Florida. With over $1 billion in new projects completed or in the planning stages, the Salt Point/Dupont Plaza. area will become the Rockefeller Center of the South with an exciting' office, retail and hotel complex offering a superior pedestrian environment. The extensive use of landscaping, the proposed extension to our river . and baywalk system, the people -oriented plazas, walkways, cafes and wat*r features and the sensitivity shown to the needs of pedestrians will be a welcome addition to our rapidly growing Downtown. 1 congratulate you on your plans for this outstanding project which will bring new construction and permanent jobs to the city of Miami. i strongly support your efforts and wish you the best in completing your financing for Siscavne Plaza. When completed your project will further our goal of est4Vr%h € i` as a new world center. Sic ely. T6XA4� �A� Maurice A. Ferro MAF/t DOWNTOWN 01VILOPMENT AUTHOWT M�". PWtBh 33131 0VW January 18, 1985 a��s»aers • Mr. Russell D. L. Wirth, Jr. Managing Partner Wirth b Co. Owner/Developer of Biscayne Plaza Complex Dear Mr. Wirth: The Downtown Development Authority (DDA) of the City. of Miami has prepared the following Economic and Development Analysis of Downtown Miami and of the ro osed Biscayne Plaza Multi -Use Comelex. This ana ysis is to familiarize the non -Miami reader #.. with certain underlying trends which will favorably affect development of Miami's Central business District (COD) over the next 2.10 years. because Biscayne Plez-a Comellexx is one of the key private development elements that will further rz these trends and will materially contribute to the r renaissance of Miami's Downtown, it has the active support ` of the Mayor of Miami and Miami's planning and administrative staff. i In .its formulation over the past year, the developers of bi`sca ns Plaza Complex have worked in close cooperation with 'City staff an A; They have specificaily tailored this `: major private undertaking to meet various governmental and - regulatory criteria and development trends of this rapidly - evolving Metropolitan Center. As a result, biscca ne Plaza� Complex should materially benefit from these trends. The Anal sis involves an overview of (i) South Florida's Economy; i) CBD development; (111) Biscayne Plaza Complex; Role in COD Renaissance; and, (iv) data sheets providing more detailed information. r , k' Roy F. Kenzie, AICP Executive Director I� i tea,.- •- � -.... ,-. - _...� .t -_ LI x If you have any questions, please feel free to contact use Sincerely, <r Dona d W. Cather, P.E. y Director GVC: is f cc: Juan Portuondo, Technical Services Administrator `.Of Sergio Rodriguez, Planning Dept. l - Sal : Page 2 of 2 Q k' �xTiz2 3 r �_ ,,' .. _ • ,,. �r.�,.r...r«.•« ..ter........ ..r• . .r riRx'�k, IL • - REPORT FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION AND CONSULTATION DUPONT PLAZA NIANI• FLORIDA FOR HOLY% CORPORATION cl • aJ1► s JOBNO. 11238-001m26 j .1 APRIL 30, 1,979 �� _ -.. ___ '' -.'- T` :` it -�'Cr =Yc-� a .' itl.i-v il'i`�.6'��13 rtji�t,Li�� �•� 1J±3s �-itc: iw.n'.w. d�'1iF,i?�.�4�i� _ _ alp �.,.,. 4.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 4.1 GE.__NERAI. The near -surface geology (to approximately -225 feet. msL) of the area surrounding the DuPont Plaza site can be briefly summarized as follows. This area lies on the eastern , edge of the Atlantic Coastal Ridge which has an average eleva- tion of +8 feet MSL to +20 feet MSL and extends along the ' eastern coast of Florida from Palm Beach County to Dade County. ; `t The regional geologic formations in the near -surface zone are zl- Miocene to Pleistocene in age and from oldest to younger are �d the Tamiami fozmation•, Fort Thontiscn formigtion, Re�Largo limestone, Anastasia formation, Miami limestone foolfteD, and Pamlico &and. These' foimations together form the Biscayne r Aquifer which is one of the most permeable aquifers in the United States. Due to salt water intrusion, which naturally occurs along the coast,. the ground water beneath' the site 01 area is essentially sea water. The Fort Thompson formation, Rey Largo limestone, and the Anastasia formation are in part Ic contemporaneous and in some areas interfinges with one another. ic Plaza sithe�..:.�.�,Th�nsor� fgrgatioty At the DuPont _� extends from depth of to 100 feet below the resent .r 3. rL ground elevation. The Rey Largo limestone and Anastasia formations are absent in the site area. The Miami limestone, has been observed in foundation excavations within three feet of the ground surface, approximately 2,000 feet west of the Xj site. However, at the DuPont Plaza site the Miami limestone i'e -: 2 +.Kst a•"iY. . F•3 '°'�►: absent and is thought to have been solutioned and eroded by the ` meandering Miami River to be replaced by the Pamlico sands and fill soils. The Pamlico sarAs form the.. majority of the near - surface soils in the site area and are loosely to moderately cemented with remnants of the older Miamitm�p��#,om approximately 33 to 40 feet below the present ground elevation. Our field investigat�.6n include the drilling and sampling of 2,600 feet of soils .and-zock_ot 40 boring locations. The locations of these borings as well as the general outline of each structure are shown on the plot plan, Plate 2. The plot plan also shows the location of four piezometers labeled P-1 through P-4 that were installed to.a depth of 15 feet to observe the groune-water conditions on this site and the location of shallow test pits excavated on the site perimeter. The procedures employed during the boring program are described in Appendix A to this report. The boring logs are also included in Appendix A. Representative soil samples extracted from the borings were tested in our laboratories in Boca Raton, .4 Florida., and Cranford, New Jersey. All laboratory results are =; presented in Appendix B of this report. Appendix B also -.. includes a discussion of the testing procedures used. On the basis of visual examination and laboratory testing, ul the soils which underlie the Dumont Plaza site have been divided into f ive layers. The generalized soil profile indl. cating the limits of each layer is presented as Plate 3. A description including pertinent laboratory test results on each layer is given below. In these discussions it should be -10- 1 d l `_ -k ■ %D w S.E. ZMD STREETdp _ goo 67 • ,.t �•�T♦ • TP • err#CC NN if 1 S S•ti i'r=• as of- ttOD �•» t��� .I • t �•t7 1 t_;I� F•y � IA � x a%; ------------- f. I t i�. k; 1 j: 1 t is { 1 r LABORATORY TEST -DATA MIME -1 F-5 p ® ® . ® 1S a SP BORING Q-32 SURFACE ELEVATION EXISTING GRACE ® SCRIPTI N tat. SILTY IINt sIMO viTN INItnL1/Ns M Ia/1A1 TO Wa /tam IItT ANO fUT (t801t•1KlIiA1 taelq ltltll LICIR CaaT . TM tlNt WII,TAAtt NIT, fAAtt S11tlLS (Ntltna "HIS) ®ua CUT • /11OWN "C"IC SILT (SOM 1 i 10 CUT SILTY /IN {A" VIT11 INCLifS11N1 K It" 11 1"14 SI M1 SIL? r AM ►tAT (LMI) T IS 6UT,SMW Plat SAN/, 1169t SILT (Ultt) s TAP Sug 01OLT CatNmjs SmTgL Sias uasTon =Q %IAii t�TS (tles(hl 41 S 301 LICNT TAN MICLT C[NtitTls SANK tI1KSTM WITH 016 tf Ct1KN1U ` tAATtL WIN LIN91190 1NWAIS ss LS L19W 9411-1Y AN/T 1,11191109 rrtlS An tAMdlltp tT T111Aftoo //W11 Q S 6 Its r[lt CI119TC1 ILLS ANs 6+ U f4AWNTS DO 1 t S9 tt # i ttit rw, V111t AlaClrl olcawl«1 «alto e e,erumprl� a.-.�a siACl s A6api •Y laa►tts 0`Ivlr tt w•otaeu«t:t6 t.r.tir I, 1►a t/E I.Ct1rL j6 1p+tatf ,,1 G we aaiYi6E «rco.e«to '.�;.. t1Aap.«0 -ptrgtiallow last - ►Intl. �� LOG OF BORING 0 LABORATORY TEST DATA L wBORING Bm3cONTRvuEp 0itit attEt4f„ Avy"t Pit SURFACE ELEVATION EXISTING GRADE tn11 raft %Mrs 60 a iIW1tK YISM =L-T ts tKsrplt NWACf v 1 Afs 7 ttd( tug, W11. i(!t(wt bttOv(tt NOi(f i s oist;:•ecti s.�oe.e � 4fr71sTwbLD 6Yr.tt «o b.4.4t «aea.b.ce� ,`„�n bf Ya: YQ(1 •r �It 9rrtf04 ttst f� 1 a' •�„ •Ysbr It Vti. To ss so Ni »t as !0 sit !3 74% too t� 006 9ft 110 lit Its lit Ito us Its ' 1 ! ";a i Ims WILL C11"gi Tt/ 11s Ms $M IA INi�t1Rf F: It�u1tW 1 �.1 k� (ttwttK KLL LtntMTt� ltKfTM[ , 1 1 { WIN. t0ottss0 i tt1.s tslr 3/1s/fs LOG OF BORING n'%64Ka (0 �cm1*f*0 PLATE L- 4A I� 11 . 4.2.3 Layer 3 - Carbonate Sands This layer of white to tan fine sand has a thickness which varies from 10 to 20 feet and is typically found from a depth of le to 33 feet. This layer is distinguished from the Layer 2 soils by higher SPT blow counts (averaging about ®10), an increased calcium carbonate content, and the absence of fine grained or organic soils. In many instances some moderately cemented gravel -sized limestone nodules exist in the matrix of very weakly cemented sands. Approximately one-third of the borings encountered a very poorly cemented sandy limestone at a depth of 20 feet. These limestone lenses are typically 12 inches thick. The range of gradation size of the Layer 3 sands is shown on Plate 7. The.dry densities of the sands which make up Layer 3 range fror.. 105 to 115 pounds per cubic foot, with a moisture content of 12 to 25 percent. 4.2.4 Layer 4.- Loosely, Cemented Sandy Limestone This relatively soft limestone varies from five to ten . feet in thickness and occurs typically in the depth interval between 33 and 40 feet. It is a loosely cemented, sandy limestone with highly cemented limestone nodules and some. interbedded zones of medium dense fine sand. SPT blow counts in this zone averaged about IS. 4.2.5 - 'C*;er 5 -]Fort Thompson Forr-ation "The IF" or,.t..�iompssan- ormatis� predominantl a li ht grey to cream, fosssiliferous, sandy limestone and colcarouse� ssendstone of marine origin. The entire section of she, —14 .01 yr OR- Lam --limestone has' been subjected to solutioning by ground water and as a result is a cavity -riddled mass of permeable rock. These solution cavities are typically one to four inches in diameter but can be as much as several feet in diameter. In our borings • we encountered sand filled cavities of five feet on two occa- sions and had consistent difficulty recovering good quality core. - The approximate distribution of solution features (mostly sand filled) greater than one foot in vertical extent Is shown on Plate S. goDue to he -..fact_. that-ths-lixewitoge is below hISMAd w his y sea water furth alutian1. tt,e • 1]! prese time as indicated by the deposition of secondary calcite crystals in many of the smaller holes or vugs. MULL." " the solutioned Zintl1re of the Fort Thompson formation, these limestones_ can. -be expected, as a mass, to act quite compe- tently, --The deepest core boring on the site (8-32) explored this fo=ation throughout its depth:. Further study of the core retrieved from this boriinw indicates that the bottom of the Fort Thompson formation _isj roximately 100 feet below the present ground eleyatinn.-.- elow tht limestone of the Fort Thompson formation lies the amitmi f ormati'n which in' this Iarea is a well -cemented sandstone to -the maximum depth explored (223.5 feet) . ram__-- - • 4.3 GROUND 'WATER The upper portion of the TaMiami formation, the Fact w l 5- 71 ..:._ �.. _. 5.0 DISCUSSIONS. CONCLUSIONS, . AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 GENERAL Based upon our review of the field and laboratory data f' . gathered during this investigation and our understanding of the i structural loads, it is our opinion that none.of the four major structures or the parking facility can be adequately supported on spread footings or a mat foundation bearing on the surface soils as they presently occur. Both the loose nature of the fine sands and the presence of fine grained and organic soil Inclusions in Layer 2 preclude the use of shallow foundations, unless some measures are taken to mitigate the problems (both low bearing capacity and excessive settlement) associated with these weak soils.' Thus, it is necessary either' to improve the strength and compressibility characteristics of Layer I and 2 soils or also bypass these soils to obtain support from the_°_ soil and rock materials below Layer 2. We h:ve considered the follow ort �� of these structures: •* 1. mass improvement of the Layer 2 soils by one of a number of in -situ techniques available such as'vibro- flotation, terra -probe, pre -loading, or dynamic compaction. 2. Complete removal and replacement of the Layer 2 soils with more competent soil material. � 3. In rom the more competent strata below Layer 2. 0i 5.2 RECOMMENDED FOUNDATION Based upon the results of this investigation, it becomes 10 -17- w mama* r,cC►o tW � t � i.+ Layer 2 would be resistant to improvement. Complete removal and replacement of the Layer 2 soils appears grossly uneconom- ical, as replacement would also need to 'be accompanied. by cdditional stabilization. Thus, we recon A It -hat ilea be "! used to transfer the building loads to &h.S_E jja kSlow Layer 2. Pile suppoft. can be Sa ined eii ;her U _long oilerive +ell Into he Fort Thompson .limestone of t.:,: &X !S 0r M shorter, high capacity displacement Riles placed in the sands of Layer 3. it is our opinion that for structures proposed for the DuPont Plaza site, building performance and economics. favors . the use of "pressure injected footings" (PIF's) , a shallow pile developed by the Franki Foundation Company. A pressure injected footing is formed by driving a heavy steel pipet plugged at the bottom with zero slurp concrete, into the ground by successive blows of a hammer falling directly on the con- crete plug. When the desired depth is reached the steel pipe is fixed and a concrete pedestal is formed by ramming succes- sive small charges of concrete into the soil at the end of the pipe. The shaft of the pile is then formed by rarrrr.ing successive quantities of concrete into the soil while progres- sively raising the steel pipe. We recommend that the P'IF's be installed to a depth of approximately 25 feet below the present ground elevation. Thus, the pedestal or bulb of the Pir will be developed in the medium dense, fine sands of Layer 3. rataMw�ft � ws,�►+l�Mrc ;; tf' i The contents of the Ammended Development Order for One Dupont Plaza are based on preliminary architectural and engineering. designs and are at a typical stage of development for any project prior to ADO approval. Only subsequent to such ADO approval it is standard practice for a project's design to develop into final design and complete construction documents. Once in its final design form the project would be subject to the complete official review processes prior to the issuance of building permits. It is the intent of the Project Sponsor to completely satisfy this standard review and approval process of the governing agencies at the appropriate time. All technical issues raised by the MECO report to the Bank of New York Syndicate dated June 2, 1986, although legitimate, are not insurmountable and are frequently encountered in any project of this magnitude. The Project Sponsor has committed to addressing and resolving these issues following the ADO approval during design development. The Project Sponsor has indicated his intent to retain highly qualified design disciplines as evidenced by the quality of the Development Team committed to: date. This team will continue to take all reasonable measures to assure that the final -;design for One Dupont Plaza will conform to all existing regulations and will r consider prudent building and design practices. The :Project Sponsor and the Development Team do not feel that any issue raised to =" date: presents an unacceptable risk to the neighboring properties including the Miami Center.. , The issues raised by the MECO report are premature considering the project ' stage of development. V` The following preliminary responses to the MECO report are not intended as final resolutions to the techinical items raised., " l.-Disposal Wells =Final well "depths will be determined by soils tests on site and .. will conform to current standards of DERM and .the Florida Dept. of Enviormental Au Regulation. Design considerations will include the- prevention of flooding of neigh- boring properties and of control of surface run-off in accordance with current standards, for which there is no problem forseen. 2. Flood Zone - The Project Sponsor and team are fully aware of existing regulations, have adjusted the project's gre)und floor design in cooperation with DERM, and have established a mutually agreeable plan for limited use of this area for restau. rants and sidewalk cafes. A variance is presently now in progress with the Dept. of Enviornment Resources Management which is expecting to grant the use of this area as intended. 3. Water & Sewer Lines - The One Dupont Plaza Ammended Development application established clearly with official authorities that all offsite water, and sewer capaci- ties are adequate for the project. On -site capacity will be evaluated following ADO approvals during the design development phase. The Project Sponsor commits to provide whatever is required in excess of existing facilities. The design deve..,�- `:. meat process will include prevention of flooding of neighboring properties. t Very truly yours, t r P&varini ,Construction Co., Inc. , Proposed Prime ContractorAL r a f a ► x -c ' 20 HectoriDwb ,U: kmw4kPip . •BY � i3�►ND June 6, 1986 - Ae 'Members, Planning Advisory Board :Y City' -of Miami 275 N.W: 2nd Street �;. Miami, Florida 33128 Re: Miami Center I --Biscayne Plaza'` t. We are local counsel for the owners of the developed portion of the property subject to the Development Order for Miami Center I. We would like to state again that we favor proposed the -Biscayne Plaza Project, but we also have concerns regarding the = project's'traffic impacts, as well as structural and environmental problems which may be associated with the project. Our proposed amendments to the Development order would require the developers of the Biscayne Plaza Project to provide safeguards that will protect their neighbors from the serious adverse impacts that would be associated with development of this project. The development order for the Biscayne Plaza _ Project should be approved only if it includes those conditions r that are reasonably necessary to protect the viability of our client's office -hotel complex which includes retail space and parking. We are submitting for your consideration a document titled "Miami,Center Biscayne Plaza - Proposed Technical Amendments to Development Order." This document addresses legal and other language problems that we have with the Planning Department's recommended Development Order. The enclosed amendments were.not included in the package of materials that we previously delivered to you. We did, however, submit this ` document to Mr. Joseph McManus, Assistant Director of the Planning Department, prier to June 4th public hearing. The specific recommendations contained in our Proposed Technical Amendments are keyed to the Planning Department's recommended Pam ON* 060 P11 rdre i3ti1 • t�I7ID � Cw" 1 :oi YfMMt�► I" gal � ' tifN1 �Tt • #IIt10 W" F** "". iima DWI I • ap �(Iij �%5•IRktt tow 51,unZk •v= Members, Planninq Advisory Board June 6, 1986 Page 2 Development Order dated May 30, 1986. The recommendations set ^t: forth in our the Proposed Substantive.Amendments (previously delivered to you) also correspond to the Planning Department's May 30, 1986 recommended Development Order. w We have no comment at this time regarding the proposal ;# submitted to you at the June 4th public hearing by Mr. Ethan Minsky on behalf of Miami Center Joint Venture and Wirth & Co. E We will, however, be responding to the substantive elements of .f this new proposal at the June 18th continuation of your public hearing on Biscayne Plaza. :1 Please feel free to call me if you have any questions t or comments regarding any of the material that we have submitted. I apologize for contributing to the volume of information that you will be reviewing in this matter. However,, `- the magnitude of the impacts that would be associated with the 3: Biscayne Plaza Project requires careful attention. Sincerely, Jeffrey Bercow P.A. cc: No. Gloria Fox Mr. Joseph.McManus Joel Maxwell, Esq. Ethan Minsky, Esq. Matthew Gorson, Esq. 6011R" b C u4. i�^I .z:i.�_ _s.m..__;:r Y} r ,...�: r t�.,3, +. ".. '`�,,f ,,.,,....;,a:_ _ ��,:.�y.:..e�'i='...,.�...]+..,_;.��:35�,:'�'6e:�.'ia:•,aSL�`.s>a'a`ii��s m ktu • I MIAMI CENTER 1/BISCAYNE PLAZA PROPOSED TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS TO DEVELOPMENT ORDER Amendments to Resolution Number l.- In the second WHEREAS clause, insert the date of the filing of the original ADA for Miami Center 1. 2. In the third WHEREAS clause, insert the date of the Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council. aY Xl 3. In the fourth WHEREAS clause, insert the date of filing of the original ADA for Miami Center I. 4. In the fifth WHEREAS clause, specify the requirements set forth in ordinance number 8290. S.- In the first line of the seventh WHEREAS clause, insert the words "As originally" prior to the words "proposed by insert the words "in 1979" after the words "Holywell Corporation". 6. In the first line of the 8th MHERZ-AS clause, delete the word "development" and substituie "Ball Point Project"; change the word "unreasonable" to "unreasonably". oil s � � s 7. 'Beginning with the thirteenth WHEREAS clause, and throughout the proposed Resolution, delete all references to Exhibit "A" • Change Exhibit "B" to Exhibit "A"; change Exhibit "C" to Exhibit "B". 8. In the fifteenth WHEREAS clause,,change the word `I "renaming" to "remaining". �; 1. 9. In the sixteenth WHEREAS clause, insert a '.' reference to an attached exhibit containinq a legal description 7:. for the "southern 3.01 acres of the site", and defining the r - project to be built on this land as the Biscayne Plaza Project. x'_. Beginning with this paragraph, and throughout the Resolution and y Exhibits, substitute "the Biscayne Plaza Project" for "the ' " southern 3.01 acres of the site". ' ,r 10. In the fifth line of the twentieth WHEREAS,clause, delete the word "subsequently"; in the seventh line, delete the words "in application for a Major Use Special Permit and".. r� 11. In the fourth line of the twent!-first WHEREAS clause, insert a comma after "Chapter,380.06 FS"; in the same line, delete the words "as pertains to" and insert "which requests for"'; in the fifth line, delete the words "the southern 3.01 acres of the site, deleting" and insert "the Biscayne Plaza Project a deletion". M $ ::• t`�`--us.,��;�e�.'• r: _ _ 1 .ate-r.,... ?x..m���zs [}.,�.aa�x�t�,. - i r. _ A r X11 12. In the twenty-second WHEREAS clause, substitute'': the word "conditions" for the word "modifications". 13. In the second line of the twenty-fifth WHEREAS gross to growth in the third line, clause, change the word "gross" "growth"; fv insert the word "has" before the word "complied"; also in the third line, after "the northerly 5.45 acres of the site" insert a reference to an attached exhibit containing the legal description of the developed portion of the property, and define this property as "Miami Center Existing"; in the fifth line insert the words "and the Miami Center I Development Order" after the words "Zoning Ordinance 6871"; beginning with the fifth line, delete the words "southerly 3.01 acres of the site " delete the words "Phases l and 21f known as in the sixth line, ,.. and insert the word "Project". Beginning with this paragraph 4 and throughout the Resolution and Exhibits, substitute "Miami Center Existing" for "the northern 5.45 acres of the site". 14. In the first sentence of Section 1 of the Findings of Fact section, delete the word "project", and substitute the words "Biscayne Plaza Project". The word "applicant", as it is used throughout the entire development order, should be defined to mean only the owner of the property presently owned by Miami Center Joint 'Venture and to be developed as "Biscayne Plaza". is. In the fifth line of section 2 of the Findings of Fact section, change the word "modifications" to "conditions"; -3- beginning with the sixth line, delete the following words: "two parts: Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of this a, resolution, pertaining to the entire 8.46 acres of Miami Canter 1, and Exhibit "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution, pertaining only to the southerly 3.01 acres of the site, known as the Biscayne Plaza Project, Phases 1 and 2", `Y and insert the following:"the-form attached hereto as Exhibit }' "A" pertaining only to the Biscayne Plaza Project"; beginning 3: :.a with the eleventh line of this paragraph, delete everything from the words "the northern SAS acres" through the end of the parenthetical, and substitute the words "Miami Center Existing 16. In section 3 of the Findings of Fact, change the �- references to Exhibit "C" to Exhibit "B"; in the fourth line, ='_? insert the words "or in this Development Order" before the words / xE' "shall be binding"; beginning with the fourth line, delete -{ 5; everything after, the words "upon the owner of" to the end of the Sy sentence, and insert "Miami Center Existing". - .: 17. In the tenth line of Section 4 of the Findings of Fast, section, delete "Exhibit 'A' on file with the City Clerk with" .18. In pection 7 of the Findings of Fact, insert the word "only" prior to "binding"; delete the word "applicant" and insert "the owner of the Biscayne Plaza Project". r ' { Rk y x :a'1 .. -.-' i' _:..:. ... ..'. .'...,, :.'. .. .. .L ... . ♦, f. t:,A .t S., in r.,}f ,.[R�i�v:6_1�Wr"'li%d27A3�� ___ __- _ Amendment 8 to "Exhibit 'B!" 1. Delete the second paragraph an page 3. Insert a 14, now paragraph regarding lack of need for a Major Use Special permit. 2. In the third paragraph on page 3, delete the word "subsequently". 3. in the last line of Condition 4# delete the words "Exhibit 'A' of this Development Order, as amended and substitute "of the original Development Order dated May 240 1979". 4. In.the last line of Condition S, delete the words "Exhibit 'A' of this Development order, as amended" and substitute "of the original Development Order dated May 24, 1979". S. In the fourth line of Condition 9, change the comma,after "City" to a period and reword the remainder of the. paragraph as follows: "If an impact fee ordinance pertaining to fire service is adopted by the City within the next five years, Applicant may, in the alternative, pay a fair share contribution pursuant to such impact fee ordinance". 0-0 kPNW G. In the fourth line of Condition 12 after the word ` "City", change the comma to a period and reword the remainder of r the paragraph as follows: "If an impact fee ordinance pertaining to police facilities is adopted by the City within the next five years, Applicant may, in the alternative, pay a fair share contribution pursuant to such adopted impact fee ordinance". s: ?. In Condition 17d, after the table, delete the words "In this event, fund shall be made" and insert "Applicant x shall make these funds". »tip S. Beginning with the first line in Condition 17e, u delete the words "or a building permit for Phase 2"; in the k _ YL fourth line after the words "DDA modifications" insert the words "if approved by FDOT"; in the eleventh line change the word "ad" y to "all". 9. In the fourth line of Condition 21, insert the ,s word'"only" after the word "runs"; delete the second parenthetical and insert ", also known as the Biscayne Plaza Project,"; and in the sixth line, insert the word "only" before the word "binding". 10. In the tenth line of Condition 27, change the word "in" to "on". �t - W, TW-70017--Mr . 77777-77,77771: I 11. -In the eighth line of Condition 29, insert the words "Biscayne Plaza Project" prior to the word "land". 12. Insert the following now Condition 30: Nothing set forth in this Development Order shall be binding in any way upon the owner or owners of Miami Center Existing, nor shall anything in this Development Order increase the obligations of such owner or owners of Miami Center Existing under the Development Order dated May 24, 1979, as amended. RM 3 61393 xj. w7w aa^g�g" y. lie -In the eighth line of Condition 29, insert the words "Biscayne Plaza Project" prior to the word "land". 12. Insert the following new Condition 30: Nothing set forth in this Development Order shall be binding in any way upon the owner or owners of Miami Center Existing, nor shall r anything in this Development Order increase the obligations of => such owner or owners of Miami Center Existing under the 'original ` Development Order dated May 24, 1979, as amended.441 t A: :, v.7�i5itr` �t 54 f . • x, ` :'. r Y:. L, • - - }I • i� MWM'A�Iw t7 dMA MtMM P.A. i June 4, 2986 BY y' Members, Planning Advisory Board ' City of Miami 2722 S.W. 27th Avenue q Miami, Florida v Re: Miami Center I - Biscayne Plaza irk Dear Members: � if C y�--• . ✓Vf This law firm represents the owners of the northern, developed portion of the property subject to the Miami Center I o Development Order. In this capacity, we are seriously eoncesned with e Plaza project potential impacts that the proposed Biscayn could have on the traffic problems of the downtown area as well as the viability of the Hotel Inter -Continental at Miami Center �. and the Edward Ball office building. r �y We have enclosed for your review three items that highlight our concerns and propose resolutions to these problems. These reports include: 4, ,r 1. Summary of Major Concerns Related to the Biscayne Plaza Proposal. 2. Miami Center I/Biscayne Plaza Proposed Substantive Amendments to Development Order. 3. Miami Center I/Biscayne Plaza - Summary of Transportation Concerns. MMn Poo Mrah olds Wrw am" I" "No t�lwi TO&OW cap 4M8&~ ir*W" GWtr+ so low Ow VWft am -an W&* A~ + Galt got $0.0I09~_�t �+►1• j10G W&O /+tM Mrr®h. Abndr► SW • 4W Poo 60k4 L PAN& aw Taiw�t•4fy� (9�►i�3•161t1 �118�•i1Rtt � A�� ;�; �..., .' `.'�; b i a. ,s Members June 4, 1986 Page 2 I will be attending your meeting t his evening. Our consultants will be prepared to answer any questions you may have regarding our concerns and the enclosed material. h. . S ce el yo�urrrss,Dp f y Bercow, P.A. ' t ta- Enclosures K N. cc: Ethan Minsky, Esq. >� Matthew Gorson, Esq. - z, Joel Maxwell, Esq. Mr. Aurelio Perez Lugones i h' Ms. Gloria Fox y i '61468 t: - i i n x a 1r sume4ary of Msjor Concerns Related to the Biscayne Plaza Pry, ect • The following conclusions and concerns related to thi -.. proposed Biscayne Plazas rroject have been Identified by highly qualified consulting angineara. Traffic and Trannortation Concerns 1. The proposed Biscayne Plaza project will create a significant increase in trarfic that will cause failures in the level of service on the **at -bound bifurcated ramp in the 1991 a.m. peak hour and on the east -bound and went -bound ramps in the 1994 a.m. and p.m. peak hours. 2. The traffic studies for Biscayne Plaza submitted to the South Florida Regional Planning Council were based upon the Downtown Development Authority's proposed amendment to the approved FDOT design for the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System. !'DOT has rejected DDA's plan and has concluded that DDA's plan will cause unacceptable levels of service on Biscayne Boulevard between S.E. 3rd street and Biscayne Boulevard Way. 3. Biscayne Plaza's roadway plan will have a significant adverse effect on the traffic attempting to exit the Edward Ball Office Building parking garage. 4. The planned location of a Biscayne Plaza entrance and exit south of the Edward Ball Office Building garage will make it unsafe and extremely difficult, if not impossible, for surface traffic to enter the parking garage of the Edward Ball Office Building. Structural and Foundation Concerns 1. Though no structural designs for the Biscayne Plaza project have been completed at this time, overturning moments at Biscayne Plaza due to wind may well be the largest designed for in the Miami area and the southeastern United States. The gross base pressures for the proposed Biscayne Plaza towers will be in the range of 7 to 13 thousand pounds per square foot. The dead and live load delivered to the base of the tallest tower may approach 2SO million pounds. 2. The construction of the Biscayne Plaza project may cause extensive settlement related distress and failure of many structural elements in the Edward Ball Office Building and the podium at Miami Center. 3. Excessive vibrations from foundation installation at the Biscayne Plaza project may cause distress to existing structure << at Miami Center. Vibrations will cause structural stresses above ground as well as further consolidation of subsoils beneath the existing foundations. 4. Any dewatering required for the proposed Biscayne Plaza project may cause a lowering of the water table below the r Edward Ball Office Building and garage and the Hotel Inter -Continental. Any such lowering of the water table will cause "} Increased effective stresses and settlement from beneath the foundation level. Environmental Concerns r: 1. The proposed Biscayne Plaza project may cause flooding, flood -related hazards, and/or increased stormwater runoff Impacts to the existing Miami Center structures, Biscayne Boulevard and/or Biscayne Bay. 2. The on -situ sewer lines searing the Edward Ball Office Building and the Hotel Inter -Continental may not have sufficient capacity to convey the increased **wage flown (beyond those expected in conjunction with the original Miami Center DRY submittal), that would be anticipated from the proposed Biscayne Plaza project. S999R M T77777 r �# SUMMARY OF PROPOSED'SUBSTANTIVE AMENDMENTS TO TRANSPORTATION RELATED CONDITIONS 17 b PLANNING DEPARTMENT: Draft condition does not require the applicant to identify any improvements to the FMOT approved Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System. gED CONDITION: More fully defines the required traffic analysis ;k and requires that the applicant identify and fund any necessary improvements to the FDOT plan. 4 17 c PLANNING DEPARTMENT: Draft condition does not include FDOT and Dade County Public Works Department in determining; ' suitable replacements for identified interim roadway improvements. PROPOSED CONDITION: Includes these two agencies in the process. n 17 f PLANNING DEPARTMENT: Draft condition does not require the applicant to provide its fair share funding for the Brickell Avenue Bridge Replacement if a*public sector financing package is committed before December 31st ` of 1991. PROPOSED CONDITION: Requires the applicant to fund its fair share 4 regardless of the existence of a public sector financing package. 17 g PLANNING DEPARTMENT: Draft condition does not require the applicant to provide its fair share funding for the Downtown f: ' Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System if a public sector .n financing package is committed before December 31st 'h S of 1991. _ ti PROBED CONDITION: Requires the applicant to fund its fair share regardless of the existence of a public sector financing package. rj;. .. l7 h PLANNING MEPAR7KW: PLANNING Draft conditions have not addressed the possibility that additional interim roadway Improvements may be =.. required if construction of the Downtown Distributor { has not begun prior to occupancy of Phase I of the project. } PROPOSED CONDITION: Addresses this possibility and defines in detail the procedure for identifying and funding these• possible additional interim Improvements. 17 1 DEPARM: Draft conditions have not addressed the funding of 4 .PLANNING certain roadway improvements to Biscayne Boulevard which were assumed in the applicants traffic . analysis. ZROP'OSED CONDITION: Addresses this issue by requiring the applicant to fund the five laning of Biscayne Boulevard from .; Biscayne Boulevard Way to S.E. ind Street. y y 7. MWF, c 17 j PLANNING DEPARTMENT; Draft conditions have not addressed the South Florida Regional Planning Council's recommended condition 15 which required the applicant to " ..e fund, bond, or provide a letter of credit to FDOT for 100% of the costs of roadway modifications ... that exclusively serve Biscayne Plaza traffic ... °'. PROPOSED CONDITION: Requires the applicant to fund roadway modifications that predominantly serve Phase II of the project. 17 k PLANNING DEPARTMENT: Draft conditions have not addressed the possible need for interim roadway improvements in the event that Phase II of the project is constructed prior to construction of the Downtown Distributor Bifuracted Ramp System. PRnPf1 M fM1%T'TTnN. AAA -.......... ♦S.i- i__.._ &..-_--t-s-- _L_ -- . ism 5 } MIAMI CENTER I/BISCAYNE PLAZA PROPOSED SUBSTANTIVE AMENDMENTS TO DEVELOPMENT ORDER (EXHIBIT "B") 16b. [Present Condition 16 becomes 16a]. (NOW) 'Applicant shall be permitted to construct parking facilities for up to 1200 parking spaces; provided, however, that if Applicant constructs more than 800 parking spaces, such excess shall 'x be furnished for the use of the owner or owners of Miami Center Existing in accordance with that certain Grant of 7 Easements and Declaration of Restrictions recorded in �. Official Records Book 12102 at page 2247 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Applicant shall provide the owner(s) of Miami Center Existing with unrestricted access to such spaces. z 16c. (New) Nothing in this Development Order, or in any development permits issued pursuant hereto, shall limit, modify or restrict in any way the rights of the owners of Miami Center Existing in and to an easement for parking purposes to be located on Biscayne Plaza property, pursuant to the terms of the Grant of Easements instrument described in Condition 16b. r, ' ' "r t`• AIL t r t a a= i e R 1 ._ n��7 k..Y:; X ___ , } H''.i. ...Y 1 . ,v' r.. Yrtf 4Li.i '•$ 1-IA :YF 'L+3s� �1�S�.iu��sht4. 'a'L)7.�`�'e%u%#' /. _ _{.ai.}_�.r5,...ciiw.•.� '. ,.,.. .,,.., _._ Jam, e y.,,„�v _. 17b. ;(Substitute) Within sixty (60) days of the date of issuance of the Development Order and prior to the issuance of any building permits for enclosed areas or parking in Phase I of Biscayne Plaza, the Applicant shall, using assumption and generation rates acceptable to the County, FDOT and SFRPC staff, prepare and submit a detailed traffic analysis documenting the proposed Biscayne Plaza project's impacts on the FDOT approved plan for the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System. Such analysis shall also include a recommended set of ,n improvements to the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System and to the adjoining surface street system, permitting the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System } and the adjoining surface street system to operate at ir acceptable levels of service during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. The Applicant shall fund or construct 100% of such recommended additional improvements. f[ 17c. (Substitute) Prior to the issuance of any building permit to for enclosed areas or parking in Phase I•of Biscayne Plaza, in the event that construction of the Downtown .Sf Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System has not begun, the. applicant shall fund or construct 100 percent of the interim roadway improvements identified as A(1), A(2), F' AM and AM in Attachment 5 (or suitable replacements v' e mutually agreed upon by FDOT, Dade County Public Works Y" „2. t �},r ,,. _ _'' __�.:sYLv.-h,:<L. Ss��_.}�n!r.xhAa.,.,.-ti:,.•*c�R..�e�XidfY�.xM.fr:�.z�:Gk�t� Department ("County"), the City of Miami Department of Public Works, Applicant and SFRPC) pursuant to 6380.06(15)(e)2, Florida Statutes. ~ 45. l7f. (Substitute) Prior to the issuance of any building permit for enclosed areas or parking in Phase I of Biscayne E Plaza, the Applicant shall fund, bond or provide a letter of credit for $517,000 (1985 dollars) to FDOT, as the L development's fair share contribution to the $9,763,000 (1985 Dollars) Brickell Avenue River Bridge replacement, ;- pursuant to $380.06(15)(e)2, Florida Statutes. Y r y - ,6.: 179. (Substitute) Prior to the issuance of any building permit s for enclosed areas or parking in Phase II of Biscayne t` Plaza, the Applicant shall fund, bond or provide a letter a'> of credit for $5,027,000 (1985 dollars) to FDOT, as the R. development's fair share contribution to the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ratp System (total cost estimated at $56 million in 1985 dollars) pursuant to 'sr 5380.06(1S)(e)2, Florida Statutes. In the event the .. currently approved plan for the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System is modified, the developmenta fair share contribution will be adjusted accordingly. 17h. (Mew) Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for Phase I of Biscayne Plaza in the event that construction of the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp { dy ..; 13� 6 ------------19, 77, o •' -. TV - System has not begun, the Applicant shall, using 7<- assumptions and generation rates acceptable to the County, FDOT and SFRPC staff, prepare and submit appropriate data and documentation affirmatively demonstrating to the satisfaction of the City -of Miami Public Works and Planning Departments, FDOT, County and SFRPC staff acceptable interim improvements (in addition to those interim improvements described in Condition 17b above).to allow roadways to operate at levels of service acceptable to the City and County in the A.M. and P.M. peak hours a, pending the completion of final traffic improvements. The data and documentation shall also include projections tl acceptable to the City, FDOT, County and SFRPC { establishing when implementation of interim solutions j' shall be required in whole or in part. Such projections shall be reviewed annually after beginning of occupancy and, when appropriate, modified by the City, FDOT, County and SFRPC. Applicant (and not Miami Center Existing) z;3 shall pay its fair share contribution to the cost of x implementing the acceptable interim improvements. Prior rE4. l to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for Phase I of Biscayne Plaza, Applicant shall estimate in a manner acceptable to the City or the County, such equitable share and bond that amount with the City or the County. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for Phase I p. of Biscayne Plaza, the Applicant shall obtain a commitment nl- .. 3 Y r r `w abl h y on the part of the City and the County to implement the i t i i is b the time indicated by aecept e n er all mprovemen y the projections. Copies of documents, data and fi R commitments shall be sent to SF'RPC and incorporated into the Amended Application for Development Approval. 171. (New) Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy r' for Phase I of Biscayne Plaza, the Applicant will fund the following improvements to Biscayne Boulevard along the site which are necessary to accommodate Biscayne Plaza traffic: construction of five traffic lanes on Biscayne ._- Boulevard from Biscayne Boulevard Way to S.E. 2nd Street; dedication of any of its property fronting on Biscayne *, Boulevard necessary for such five-lanings; and addition of a third left turn lane northbound from Biscayne Boulevard KEYy• 14.7v onto S.E. 2nd Street. If approved interim improvements described in Condition 17h obviate the need for any of these improvements, such improvement(s) shall not be required. 17j. (Nov) Prior to the issuance of any building permit for enclosed areas or parking in Phase II of Biscayne Plaza, the Applicant shall fund, bond or provide a letter of ih f•" credit to MOT for 100 percent of the costs of roadway modifications, mutually agreed upon by F°DOT, the City and a+ ....... ... :... x 1 L Council staff, that predominantly serve Biscayne Plaza traffic. 17k. (New) Prior to the issuance of any building permit for enclosed areas or parking in Phase II of Biscayne Plaza, in the event that construction of the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System has not been completed, the Applicant shall, using assumptions and generation sates acceptable to County, DOT and SFRPC staff, prepare and A submit appropriate data and documentation affirmatively demonstrating to the satisfaction of the City of Miami Public Works and Planning Departments, FDOT, County and SFRPC staff acceptable interim improvements (in addition to,those interim improvements described in Conditions 17b and 17h above) to allow roadways to operate at levels of service acceptable to the City and County in the A.M. and P.M. peak hours pending the completion of the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ratap System. The data and documentation shall also include projections acceptable to the City, FDOT, County and the Council establishing when implementation of interim solutions shall be required in fi. whole or in part. Such projections shall be reviewed annually after beginning of occupancy -and, when appropriate, modified by the City, FDOT, County and Council. Applicant (and not Miami Center Existing) shall ' pay its fair share contribution to the cost of } 3 i i 44 .x. '•rt= implementing the acceptable interim improvements. Prior to the issuance of any building permit for Phase II of Biscayne Plaza, Applicant shall estimate in a manner acceptable to the City or the County, such equitable share '"r< and bond that amount with the City or the County. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for Phase II of Biscayne Plaza, the Applicant shall obtain a commitment on the part of the City and the County to implement the acceptable interim improvements by the time indicated by the projections. Copies of documents, data and commitments shall be sent to SFRPC and incorporated into the Application for Development Approval. �f - 171. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for Phase I of Biscayne Plaza, in the event that construction. has commenced on the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp. System, the Applicant shall pay its fair share _ contribution for Phase I traffic impacts on the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System. Such fair share -. contribution shall be credited towards the fair share amount established in Condition 17g. t� ll =62 M. (Substitute) Withhold issuance of any building permits for Phase I of Biscayne Plaza until Applicant satisfies the requirements of Condition 17b. The absence of FDOT approval, as required by Condition 17b, shall create a reasonable likelihood of additional regional impact, causing the development to bt subject to further development -of -regional -impact review pursuant to 1380.06(19)(a), Florida Statutes (1985). ,,256. (Substitute) Pursuant to 1780.06(15)(e)(2), Florida Statutes (1985), withhold issuance of any building permits for Phase -I of Biscayne Plaza until all interim road improvements identified in Attachment 5 are constructed an required by Condition 17c. s. 25f. (Substitute) Withhold issuance of any building permits fort Phase I of Biscayne Plaza until the Applicant funds, bonds N or provides a letter of credit for $517,000 (1985 dollars) -K pursuant to Condition 27f. 259. (Substitute) Withhold issuance of ary building permits for Phase II of Biscayne Plaza until the Applicant funds, bonds,or provides a letter of credit for $5,027,000 (1985 pursuant to Condition 179. •dollars) 1A �;"ZNW n pt 25h. (Substitute) If construction has not commenced on the :ya Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System, withholdF issuance of any certificates of occupancy for the Biscayne Plaza Phase I portion of the project until Applicant has • satisfied the requirements of Condition 17h. M . (New) Withhold issuance of any building permits for Phase ..I of Biscayne Plaza until the Applicant satisfies the requirements of Condition 171. 25j. (New) Withhold issuance of any building permits for Phase II of Biscayne Plaza until the Applicant satisfies the .' requirements of Condition 17j.' :=as 25k. .(New) If construction has not been completed on the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System, withhold any building permits for Phase II of Biscayne Plaza until the Applicant satisfies the r®quirements of Condition 17k. 2S1. (New) Withhold issuance of a certificate of occupancy for Phase II of Biscayne Plaza until construction is completed f y . on the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System. q F x - ^N i yj y c- i? 35m. (Nsw) Withhold issuance of a certificate of occupancy for Phase I of Biscayne Plaza if construction has commenced onl 3 �Y the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System and. K. Applicant has not satisfied the requirements of Condition 171. Yl, h it ft 1. K (?•- In Attachment 5, paragraph A3, line 6 - after "warranted"`_ insert: (provided, however, that such signalization does -not S , preclude the approved signalization of the Edward Ball Office tip} Building parking garage exit, and such signalization for the F Biscayne Plaza exit shall be coordinated with the signalization r+4tii .for the Edward Ball Office Building). _ r `L Insert the following language into the "Safety and Security"{ l{ T t s � y section of the Development Order: ]S licant shall, at its own • �►Pp expense, provide all necessary r _} measures in order to prevent or*mitigate any adverse effects of Tr the proposed construction of Biscayne Plaza on the foundations and structures of Miami Center Existing, in accordance with all applicable codes, standards, and sound engineering and tti construction practices. -10» .. kY ., iJE-L�titE d4 Insert the following language into the "Environment" section of the Development Order: Applicant shall, at its own expense, provide all necessary measures in order to prevent or mitigate any adverse effects of the proposed construction, operation and/or maintenance of Biscayne Plaza on the water supply, sewage disposal, gravity runoff disposal and/or stomwater drainage systems of Miami Center Existing. Applicant shall perform all such necessary measures in accordance with all applicable codes, standards, regulations, and sound environmental, site engineering and construction practices. Insert the following language at the end of the Development Order: Nothing set forth in this Development Order shall limit, modify or restrict in any way any of the rights of the owners of Miami Center Existing, whether at law or in equity, including but not limited to the right to protect (a) the structural integrity of all improvements located an Miami Center Existing property; (b) the foundation support for such improvements; and (c) the integrity and function of the water supply, sewage disposal, gravity runoff disposal and/or stormwater drainage systems of Miami Center Existing. s • Ss Steel Hector&Davis • My+ Fares ,:� i d RY B/rCow R A f?K; ST•20�5 '. �m� June 4, 1986 BY HAND: Joseph McManus ri =• Assistant Director City of Miami Planning Department 275 N.W. 2nd Street r Miami, Florida 33128 Re: Miami Center I -- Biscayne Plaza r> Dear Joe: We have enclosed the following documents: 1. Miami Center 1/Biscayne Plaza Proposed Technical Amendments to Development Order. 2. Miami Center 1/Biscayne Plaza Proposed Substantive Amendments to Development Order ("Exhibit B"). p 3. Summary of Major Concerns Related to the Biscayne Plaza Proposal. We have revised these documents to correspond to the Planning Department's May 30, 1986 proposed development order' for Biscayne Plaza.' . Please call me if you have any goes ons or comments <, !, regarding this material._ Sin erel," y , , Je r y Bercow, P.A. Enclosures j€ cc: Ethan Minsky, Esq. ry< 3 Matthew Carson, Esq. Joel Maxwell, Esq. Mr. Walter Pierce Mr. Rodney Arroyo 600OR y t04- ON' f SO& F Ktw Qum� �.�i 5t" k403, La. t 7• ANX sour *", Fpsa C*nw 6w" i 4904t". W—a 3N 4a1'wK^ 4•0 5_WV $ F k 5°w31 :3iiE 2JG k7: ,sr�,2,0 vw.... , 205 W" k,#--i 2V 3t: s Ca- w er r A bow riE9:'^.a J:�b: T�y;,,yyiW -•"GI ....i S -la ., a.. .. _. e .---.;,L+�,�.t:'f .s ��m.'!ic,-.+.1.` a.-f. 4s.1, ::�; _ ....',.� .�_ :L�z ?___._s..r_..sd 'id,i'.. x...;-�.a:� .+i u ,.. i,r. ;.•s-.W?-.f':.,. - — ,t. . MIAMI CENTER I/BISCAYNE PLAZA PROPOSED SUBSTANTIVE AMENDMENTS TO DEVELOPMENT ORDER (EXHIBIT "B") 16b. (Present Condition 16 becomes 16aj. (New) Applicant shall be permitted to construct parking facilities for up to 1200 parking spaces; provided, however, that if Applicant constructs more than 800 parking spaces, such excess shall be furnished for the use of the owner or owners of Miami Center Existing in accordance with that certain Grant of , Easements and Declaration of Restrictions recorded in ry '' Official Records Book 11102 at page 2247 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Applicant shall provide the owner(s) o: Miami Center Existing with unrestricted k ) ,access to such spaces. "16c. (New) Nothing in this Development Order, or in any t - k ... development permits issued pursuant hereto, shall limit, modify or restrict in any way the rights of the owners of Miami Center Existing in and to an easement for parking purposes to be located on Biscayne Plaza property, .,, pursuant to the terms of the Grant of Easements instrument #` described in Condition 16b. tj }. t M 1 j ,cp$iv- 17b. (Substitute) Within sixty (60) days of the date of issuance of the.Development Order and prior to the issuance of any building permits for enclosed areas or parking in Phase I of Biscayne Plaza, the Applicant shall, using assumption and generation rates acceptable to the . County, FDOT and SFRPC staff, prepare and submit a detailed traffic analysis documenting the proposed Biscayne Plaza project's impacts on the FDOT approved plan for the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System. Such analysis shall also include a recommended set of r' improvements to the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System and to the adjoining surface street system, permitting the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System and the adjoinirg surface street system to operate at y acceptable levers of service during the A.M. and P.M. peak . 41 hours. The Applicant shall fund or construct 1000, of such recommended additional improvements. A 1 17c. (Substitute) Prior to the issuance of any building permit for enclosed areas or parking in Phase I of Biscayne Ttw' CV Plaza, in the event that construction of the Downtown 4 Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System has not begun, the applicant shall fund or construct 100 percent of the interim roadway improvements identified as A(l), A(2), A(3) and A(4) in Attachment 5 (or suitable replacements } mutually agreed upon by FDOT, Dade County Public Works NE '' F �A r' ..n Department ("County"), the City of Miami Department of Public Works, Applicant and SFRPC) pursuant to §380'.06(15)(e)2, Florida Statutes. 17f. (Substitute) Prior to the issuance of any building permit for enclosed areas or parking in Phase I of Biscayne s Plaza, the Applicant shall fund, bond or provide a letter of credit for $517,000 (1985 dollars) to FDOT, as the development's fair share contribution to the $9,763,000 (1985 Dollars) Brickell Avenue River Bridge replacement, pursuant to §380.06(15)(e)2, Florida Statutes. ?iV 17g. (Substitute) Prior to the issuance of any building permit Fs for -enclosed arias or parking in Phase II of Biscayne ' Plaza, the Appl_cant shall fund, bond or provide a letter of credit for $5,027,000 (1985 dollars) to FDOT, as the development's fair share contribution to the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System (total cost estimated at 06 million in 1985 dollars) pursuant to 1380.O6(15)(e)2, Florida Statutes. In the event the currently approved plan for the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System is modified, the development's fair share contribution will be adjusted accordingly. ;. 17h. (New) Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for Phase I of Biscayne Plaza in the event that construction of the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp -3- iVkME- � } to Mp_iitcu.uaC 4 � - System has not begun, the Applicant shall, usinq assumptions and generation rates acceptable to the County, FDOT and SFRPC staff, prepare and submit appropriate data and documentation affirmatively demonstrating to the satisfaction of the City of Miami Public Works and Planning Departments, FDOT, County and SFRPC staff acceptable interim improvements (in addition to those interim improvements described in Condition 17b above) to 'T h allow roadways to operate at levels of service acceptable J to the City and County in the A.M. and P.M. peak hours ; k6 pending the completion of final traffic improvements. The z data and documentation shall also include projections r acceptable to the City, FDOT, County and SFRPC establishing wY:_n implementation of interim solutions ' shall be requi:_d in whole or in part. Such projections shall be reviewed annually after beginning of occupancy and, when appropriate, modified by the City, FDOT, County and SFRPC. Applicant (and not Miami Center Existing) shall pay its fair share contribution to the cost of implementing the acceptable interim improvements. Prior. to the issuance of a certificate•of occupancy for Phase I of Biscayne Plaza, Applicant shall estimate in a manner acceptable to the City or the County, such equitable share and bond that amount with the City or I.he County. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for Phase I of Biscayne Plaza, the Applicant shall obtain a commitment .. w 4" t AA on the part of the City and the County to implement the acceptable interim improvements by the time indicated by the projections. Copies of documents, data and commitments shall be sent to SFRPC and incorporated into the Amended Application for Development Approval. ; 171. (New) Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for Phase I of Biscayne Plaza, the Applicant will fund the following improvements to Biscayne Boulevard along the site which are necessary to accommodate Biscayne Plaza i traffic: construction of five traffic lanes on Biscayne {{ . _ ii ' Boulevard from Biscayne Boulevard Way to S.E. 2nd Street; dedication of any of its property fronting on Biscayne Boulevard necessary for such five-lanings; and addition of a third left t:::•n lane northbound from Biscayne Boulevard onto S.E. 2nd Street. If approved interim improvements described in Condition 17h obviate the need for any of • rz`i •' these improvements, such improvement(s) shall not be F required. 17j: (New) Prior to the issuance of any building permit for enclosed areas or parking in Phase II of Biscayne Plaza, the Applicant shall fund, bond or provide a letter of credit to MOT for 100 percent of the costs of roadway modifications, mutually agreed upon by MOT, the City and ZN • _ dry.. 23''w a q7 �S t rtt e r : . z - _ 'f.�a$Lck'.iR. t Council staff, that predominantly serve Biscayne Plaza traffic. 17k. (New) Prior to the issuance of any building permit for enclosed areas or parking in Phase II of Biscayne Plaza, in the event that construction of the Downtown Distributor . Bifurcated Ramp System has not been completed, the Applicant shall, using assumptions and generation rates acceptable to County, DOT and SFRPC staff, prepare and submit appropriate data and documentation affirmatively demonstrating to the satisfaction of the City of Miami �. Public Works and Planning Departments, MOT, County and SFRPC staff acceptable interim improvements (in addition x to those inter::• improvements described in Conditions 17b and 17h above) :o allow roadways to operate at levels of service acceptable to the City and County in the A.M. and ` P.M. peak hours pending the completion of the Downtown ` Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System. The data and ` documentation shall also include projections acceptable to the City, MOT, County and the Council establishing when implementation of interim solutions shall be required in whole or in part. Such projections shall be reviewed annually after beginning of occupancy and, when �= appropriate, modified by the City, MOT, County and Council. Applicant (and not Miami Center Existing) shall Pay its fair share contribution to the cost of _6. iY 5 Ass i Y Y[t'�Ea}4 implementing the acceptable interim improvements. Prior to the issuance of any building permit for Phase II of Biscayne Plaza, Applicant shall estimate in a manner acceptable to the City or the County, such equitable share and bona that amount with the City or the County. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for Phase II of Biscayne Plaza, the Applicant shall obtain -a commitment on the part of the City and the County to implement the acceptable interim improvements by the time indicated by the projections. Copies of documents, data and commitments shall be sent to SFRPC and incorporated into' the Application for Development Approval. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for. Phase I of Biscayne Plaza, in the event that construction , has commenced on the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System, the Applicant shall pay its fair share r contribution for Phase I traffic impacts on the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System. Such fair share contribution shall be credited towards the fair share amount established in Condition 17g. ;.r"��� __ a_ 25b. (Substitute) Withhold issuance of any building permits for Phase I of Biscayne Plaza until Applicant sati-sfies the requirements of Condition 17b. The absence of FDOT approval, as required by Condition 17b, shall create a reasonable likelihood of additional regional impact, - causing the development to be subject to further development -of -regional -impact review pursuant to §380.06(19)(a), Florida Statutes (1985). 25c. (Substitute) Pursuant to §780.06(15)(e)(2), Florida Statutes (1985), withhold issuance of any building permits s S for Phase I of Biscayne Plaza until all interim road improvements identified in Attachment 5 are constructed as required by Condition 17c. 25f. (Substitute) Withhold issuance of any building permits for Phase I of Biscayne Plaza until the Applicant funds, bonds or provides a letter of credit for 8517,'000 (1985 dollars) pursuant to Condition 17f. 2,5q- (Substitute) Withhold issuance of any building permits for Phase II of Biscayne Plaza until the Applicant funds, bonds,or provides a letter.of credit for $5,027,000 (1985 dollars) pursuant to Condition 17g. t t 25h. (Substitute) If construction has not commenced on the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System, withhold. issuance of any certificates of occupancy for the Biscayne Plaza Phase I portion of the project until Applicant has satisfied the requirements of Condition 17h. 25i. (New) Withhold issuance of any building permits for Phase I of Biscayne Plaza until the Applicant satisfies the requirements of Condition 17i. 25j., (New) Withhold issuance of any building permits for Phase 4' II of Biscayne Plaza until the Applicant satisfies the N`. requirements of Condition 17j. 25k. (New) If construction has not been completed on the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System, withhold any _building permits for Phase II of Biscayne Plaza until the Applicant_ satisfies the requirements of Condition 17k. 251. .(New) Withhold issuance of a certificate of occupancy for Phase II of Biscayne Plaza until construction is completed on the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System. _9,. tt n 25m.- (New) Withhold issuance of a certificate of occupancy for Phase I of Biscayne Plaza if construction has commenced on the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System and Applicant has not satisfied the requirements of Condition 171. In Attachment 5, paragraph A3, line 6 after warranted" insert: (provided, however, that such signalization does not preclude the approved signalization of the Edward Ball Office Building parking garage exit, and such signalization for the Biscayne Plaza exit shall be coordinated with the signalization forthe Edward Ball Office Building). Insert the following -'anguage into the "Safety and Security" section of the Develc:Dment Order: Applicant shall, at its own expense, provide all necessar7 measures in order to prevent or mitigate any adverse effects of the proposed construction of Biscayne Plaza on the foundations and structures of Miami Center Existing, in accordance with all applicable codes, standards, and sound engineering and construction practices. insert the following language into the "Environment" section of the Development Order: Applicant shall, at its own expense, provide all necessary measures in order to prevent or mitigate any adverse effects of the proposed construction, operation and/or maintenance of Biscayne Plaza on the water supply, sewage disposal, gravity runoff disposal and/or stormwater drainage systems of Miami Center Existing. Applicant shall perform all such necessary measures in accordance with all applicable codes, standards, regulations, and sound environmental, site engineering and construction practices. Insert the following language at the end of the Development Order: Nothing set forth in this Development Order shall limit, modify or restrict in any way any of the rights of the owners of Miami Center Existing, whether at law or in equity, including but not limited to the right to protect (a) the structural integrity of all improvements located on Miami Center Existing property;•(b) the foundation support for such improvements; and (c) the integrity and function of the water supply, sewage disposal, gravity runoff disposal and/or stormwater drainage systems of Miami Center Existing. 61355 6/3/86 6 PM -11- 1 -t a. n: is a MIAMI CENTER 1/BISCAYNE PLAZA PROPOSED TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS TO DEVELOPMENT ORDER I, Amendments to Resolution Number 1. In the second WHEREAS clause (P. 1), insert the date of the filing of the original ADA for Miami Center 1. 2. In the third WHEREAS clause (P. 1), insert the = date of the Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council. 3. In the fourth WHEREAS clause (P. 1-2), insert the , �, date of filing of the original ADA for Miami Center I. 4. In the fifth WHEREAS clause (P. 2), specify the t requirements set fort:. in ordinance number 8290. -• S. In the first line of the seventh WHEREAS clause :,. (P. 2), insert the words "As originally" prior to the words t "proposed by" insert the words "in 1979" after the words "Holywell Corporation". p a 5. In the first line of the 8th WHEREAS clause (P. 2), delete the word "development" and substitute "Ball Point Project". Sit t +.»a:L_'t.•i&t,....i.t eJ,. .y.:i.�e�tib,STLiu�'A`�_��$Xi s.S. tr'd....u�SL.v"'+ Fi - _ -._-�..,_- - �.i...r;w..,&e^..�cv.�-ri3'_.c3'a�:rf��—�5�'ik=FJ -..xz-ate - - - i 4 4 t 1 7. In the thirteenth WHEREAS clause (P. 2-3), insert and Resolution 80-707; September 25, 1980" after the words "May 24, 1979". �r 8. In the sixteenth WHEREAS clause (P. 3), insert a reference to an attached exhibit containing a legal description for the "southern 3.01 acres of the site", and defining the project to be built on this land as the Biscayne Plaza Project. Beginning with this paragraph, and throughout the Resolution and Exhibits, substitute "the Biscayne Plaza Project" for "the southern 3.01 acres of the site". 9. In the twentieth WHEREAS clause (P. 3), substitute' "Chapter 380.06(19)" for "Chapter 380.032(19)(b)". 10. In the fourth line of the twenty-first WHEREAS clause (P. 3-4), insert a comma after "Chapter 380.06 FS"; in the same line, delete the words "as pertains to" and insert "which requests for"; in the fifth line, delete the words "the southern 3.01 acres of the site, deleting" and insert "the Biscayne Plaza Project a deletion of". 11. In the twenty-second WHEREAS clause (P. 4)1 substitute the word "conditions" for the word "modifications,"... -2- 12. In the third line of the twenty-fifth WHEREAS clause (P. 4), insert the word "has" before the word "complied"; Also in the third line, after "the northerly 5.45 acres of the site" insert a reference to.an attached exhibit containing the legal description of the developed portion of the property, and define this property as "Miami Center Existing"; in the fifth line insert the words "and Miami Center Existing" after the words "land and development regulations"; beginning with the fifth line, delete the words "southerly 3.01 acres of the site known as"; in the sixth line, delete the words "Phases 1 and 2" and insert the word "Project". Beginning with this paragraph and throughout the Resolution and Exhibits, substitute "Miami Center Existing" for "the northern 5.45 acres of the site". 13. In the first sentence of Section I of the Findings of Fact section, delete the word "project", and substitute the words "Biscayne Plaza Project". The word "applicant", as it is used throughout the entire development order, should be defined to mean only the owner of the property presently owned by Miami Center Joint Venture and to be developed as "Biscayne Plaza". r_ 14. In the second line of section 2 of the Findings of Fact section, insert the words "and resolution 80-707; September 25, 1980;" after the words "May 24, 1979" and delete the words "as amended"; in the fifth line of section 2, replace b, j"3 { ,h _ _ 1 �y V �✓Fiy 'SSA _ 3r- the word "modifications" with "conditions"; in the sixth line of section 2 replace the word "two" with the word "three" and add the words "this Resolution," after the word "parts:"; in the seventh line of section 2, replace the phrase "pertaining to entire 8.46 acres of Miami Center I" with "copies of Resolutions 79-396 and 80-70""; in the tenth line of section 2 after the words "Phases 1 and 2" add the following: and more particularly described in Exhibit Exhibit "B" shall be binding only upon Applicant, it assigns and/or successors, and shall constitute a covenant running with the land for the southern 3.01 acres that are part of the Biscayne Plaza Project in accordance with section 11 of this Resolution. Nothing set forth in Exhibit "B" shall be binding in any way upon the owners of Miami Center Existing, its successors and/or assiczs, nor shall anything in Exhibit "B" increase or otherwise affect the obligations -D£ Miami Center Existing under Exhibit "A". With respect only to the Biscayne Plaza Project property and the obligations of Applicant, its successors and assigns, any provision of Exhibit "B" which conflicts with in Exhibit "A" shall be controlling and shall supersede such provision of Exhibit "A"; provided, however, that nothing contained in Exhibit "B" shall relieve Applicant, its assigns and/or successors, of any of its obligations under Exhibit "A". beginning with the eleventh line of Section 2, delete everything from the words "the development on the northern 5.45 acres" through the end of the parenthetical, and substitute the words "Miami Center Existing" 15. In the fourth line of section 3 of the Findings of Fact, insert the words "or in this Development Order" before the words "shall be binding"; beginning with the fourth line, delete everything after the words "the owner of" to the end of the sentence, and insert "Miami Center•Existing". 16. In the tenth line of Section 4 of the Findings of Fact section, delete "Exhibit 'A' on file with the City Clerk with". ` 17. In section 7 of the Findings of Fact, insert the ;ys word "only" prior to "binding"; delete the word "applicant" and insert "the owner of .he Biscayne Plaza Project". !4 18. Add the following as new section 11: "Section 11. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record this Development Order, consisting of this -Resolution and Exhibits "A" and "B", with the Clerk, Dade County Circuit Court, pursuant to Section 380.06(16)(f), Florida Statutes (1985), specifying that this Development Order is a covenant running with the land that consists of the southerly 3.01 acres.that is the site for the Biscayne Plaza Project and more particularly described in Exhibit This covenant shall be binding on Miami Center Joint Venture, its -- successors and/or assigns, jointly or severally." �5- 1 years, Applicant may, in the alternative, pay a fair share contribution pursuant to such adopted impact fee ordinance". r - { >�r 6. In Condition 17d, after the table, delete the words "In this event, fund shall be made" and insert "Applicant shall make these funds". 7. Beginning with the first line in Condition 17e, delete the words "or a building permit for Phase 2"; in the >3 fourth line after the words "Alternative (Figure 5)" insert the' {' words "if approved by FDOT". S. In the fourth line of Condition 21, insert the word "only" after the word "runs"; delete the parenthetical t phrase "(AKA Biscayne Plaza Phases 1 and 2)" and insert ", also known as the Biscayne Plaza Project,"; and in the sixth line, - insert the word "only" before the word "binding". , 9. In the fifteenth line of Condition 29, insert the words "Biscayne Plaza Project" prior to the word "land". 12. Insert the following new Condition 30: Nothing set forth in this Development Order shall be binding in any way upon the owner or owners of Miami Center Existing, nor shall anything in this Development Order increase the obligations of such owner or owners of.Miami Center Existing under the original Development Order dated May 24, 1979, as amended. 684614 6!3/86 e 6pm -7- 0 0, Summary of Major Concerns Related to the Biscayne Plaza Pro Lect The following conclusions and concerns related to the proposed Biscayne Plaza Pro3ect have been identified by highly qualified consulting engineers. Tzaffic and Transportation Concerns 1. The proposed Biscayne Plaza project will create a significant increase in traffic that will cause failures in the level of service on the east -bound bifurcated ramp in the 1991 a.m. peak hour and on the east -bound and west -bound ramps in the 1994 a.m. and p.m. peak hours. 2. The traffic studies for Biscayne Plaza submitted to the South Florida Regional Planning Council were based upon the Downtown Development kuthority's proposed amendment to the appro7ed FDCT des:gn for the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System. FDOT has re)ected DDA's plan and has concluded that DDA's plan will cause unacceptable levels of ser.-ice on Biscayne Boulevard between S.E. 3rd street and Biscayne Boulevard War. 3. Biscayne Plaza's roadway plat: will have a significant ad.-._r.-e e=:_ect on the traffic attempting to exit the Edward ball Office Building parking garage. T-- manned location of a Biscayne Plaza entrance and exit south of the Ed•,.ard Ball Office Building garage will make it ur:sa:e and exzreme11 difficult, if not impossible, for surface traffic to erte_ the parking garage of the Edward Ball Office Build:.nJ. St_uctura: anti Foundation Concerns 1. Though no structural designs for the Biscayne Plaza project have been completed at this time, overturning moments at Biscayne Plaza due to wind may well be the largest designed for in the Miami area and the southeastern United States. The gross base pressures for the proposed Biscayne Plaza towers will be in the range of 7 to 1:: thousand pounds per square foot. The dead and live load delivered to the base of the tallest tower may approach 250 million pounds. 2. The cor.-truction of the Biscayne Plaza project may cause extensive sett.'•-ient related distress and failure of many structural elements i:. the Edward Ball Office Building and the podium at Miami Center. 3. Excessive vibrations from foundation installation at the Biscayne Plaza project may cause distress to existing structure { at Miami Center. Vibrations will cause structural stresses above 4 ground as well as further consolidation of subsoils beneath the f existing foundations. { 4. Any dewatering required for the proposed Biscayne Plaza project may cause a lowering of the water table below the Edward Ball Office Building and garage and the Hotel Inter -Continental. Any such lowering of the water table will cause increased effective stresses and settlement from beneath the foundation level. En,:ironm:ntal Concerns 1. The proposed Biscayne Plaza project may cause flooding, flood -related hazards, and./or increased stortrwater runoff imaacts to the existing Miami Center structures, Biscayne Boulevard and, or Lr scavne Bay. The sewer lines serving the Edward Ball Office 'L:1dinn, and the Hotel Inter -Continental may not have sufficient to;aci ;1 tc collver the increased sewage flows (beyond those expe: ted coz.jur,ct�on �.•:t:. . lie original M_'atr.: Center DRI sub.,,: a;.al), that wou1:3 aE aatic:Ew pated :r. the proposed .'sca.:ne F_aza project. � 6• v 1 .i Al MERSHON. SAWYER, JOHNSTON. DUNWODY 81 COLE - A •A*'NCRZ"IP tNCLJD'%G P CrCSSCI•�wldY� - SOUTh•[AST FINANCIAL CENT�(�111g�1- 200 SOUTH eISCAYNC SOULCv[��w q��JUN , N -6 PHJ• 1 4 MIAMI. I•LORIDA 33131 (305) 35e 5100 ��ff�J �C� CAef c MERCOIX'cLclt 51X-Ld 3;. TCLccoPtce (305; 350 • eOte NAPL911 OAF C[ + eob rt.Tq •vcN_c SC--- ' w.PLcs FLo.•CA 33ss.� [..": .. OfA1ONO 0. NOwt. JR.. R A. -t.t•«oti[,e 3, 262 •'3C2 1� r June 6, 1986 HAND` DELIVERED: -> Mr. Sergio Rodriguez City of Miami Planning Department. 275 y.W. 2nd Street Room. 226 Miami, Florida 33123 ` Rem Proposed Amendment to Development Order for Miami -enter I Located on the >, Southern Portion of Tract D, Block I, x= DuPont Plaza (50-11) P.R.D.C. Oe'air Mr. Roderiguezt F We represent Gerald D. Hines Interests and Block Five Vent.'ure, the owner and developer of the Southeast Financial _ t Center.and are writing to you and the members of the Planning Advisory Hoard, pursuant to the Board's request that all comments regarding the referenced proposed amendment be ' delivered to the Planning Department this date. We,have expressed our support for the completion of z levelopment,.of Ball Point and offer,our support to Mr. Gould and 0.s Y'Florida Equity Corp., the partners of Miami Center y' joint Venture, asi applicant and to Mr. Russell girth of Wirth and Co., the prospective purchaser and developer, so long as this development and future developments in the downtown area can be adequately served by the FOOT -approved Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System and so long as construction can be carried out in a manner that -will -not adversely threaten w the foundations and structural integrity of existing buildings. In furtherance of these concerns, we have reviewed.the - amendments proposed by the Planning Department and by Miami Center Joint Venture and attach hereto our proposed changes for your consideration and discussion at the next scheduled planning Advisory Board Meeting on June 18. is t Mr. Sergio Rodriguez June 6,1986 Page 2 we further take this'opportunity to object to the continued attachment of two unapproved traffic plans, one prepared by the Downtown Development Authority and the other proposed by Mr. Ted Gould, both of which show the closure of S.E. 3rd Street which we oppose. Until either or both of these plans has been reviewed by the Dupont Plaza Task Force and the Florida Department of Transportion as to their feasibility and affordability, it is, at best, misleading to the Board and objectionable to our client for such proposals to be considered with reference to the amendments being requested at this time. We call to your attention that the SFRPC specifically did not consider traffic impact when it approved the amendment from residential condominium to office towers. If any changes are to be made to the approved FOOT Plan, _ such changes should be based on current studies that analyze an consider all relevant criteria, including, but not limited to the full occupancy of existing buildings as well as proposed buildings. As pointed out by you in your recent report to the Board, as of this date neither the applicant nor the developer has established that the proposed improvements can be adequately served by the FDOT-approved Bifurcated Ramp System. } I am certain that the Board will be concerned that the addition of over one million square feet of office space and the conversion of residential units to commercial office space willf have significant adverse implications to traffic within the Dupont plaza area. it is our intention to focus attention on these concerns in this regard and to assure the Board.that we _ consider -the preservation of our existing levels of access as vital to our client. Wei enclose herewith copies of this letter and the three ~Ev amendments we propose to the development order for consideration and review by the members of the Board. WeYis F;.. sincerely appreciate this opportunity to express our concerns to you and the Board and shall be happy to answer any questions you might have. } ncerely, tiY 6 (a �< i Osmond C. Howe, ;�Jr For the Firm � t � - 77777777777 k' G Mr. Sergio Rodriguez June 61 1986 - page 3 4CH:slc Enclosures cc: Pedro Lopez w/encl. Herbert Lee Simon w/encl. Aaron J. Manes w/encl. Donald Benjamin w/encl. Pablo Gomez w/encl. Jorge Pedraza w/encl. Eladio Armesto Garcia w/encl. Raymond Asmar w/encl. Ella D. Hadley w/encl. Dorothy Spohn w/encl. ' Ethan Minsky, Esq. w/encl. Jeffrey Bercow, Esq. w/encl. Russell D. L. Wirth, Jr. w/encl. r °ig, f -rw4t a PROPOSED CHANGES TO DEVELOPMENT ORDER !OR MIAMI CENTER I DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED f BY THE CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. Subparagraph l7b should be amended to read as follows: 'r (The new material is underlined) G 17.b Within 180 days of the date of issuance of the Development Order, the Applicant is to present a traffic analysis demonstrating that the FDOT-approved Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp Systeifi (attachment ) will t: accommodate the projected traffic for Biscayne Plaza, both - Phase 1 and 2, based upon full development of all residential k units as commercial and retail space, said traffic analysis subject to the approval of FDOT in writing. If Applicant ge�,eks to_Mend the approved FDOT ra f f i c plan. Applicant must prove h chanats will y r im c r detrimentally VUE20ses &2 fit MEMO structures in th0,22VAt2wn -oral, Such proof sball k2.k§sed on «U.;. ;.. !•Mail slaact)_.;2u&hegst :. old South.92st son w f • `E a other existing develooment in Downtown Miami and any proposed development of Downtown Miami, including but not limited to the Baysids development anddeveloprnent of the three remaining ry blocks of DuP nt Plaza. 2. insert a new Paragraph 9 on,page 6 of the proposed Development �Yr y order under the heading "Safety and Security": 9. Applicant shall, at its own expense, Provide all necessary measures in order to prevent or mitigate any adverse effects of the proposed construction of Biscayne Plaza Phases 1 and 2 on a the foundations and structures of develoyments in th2, immediate area f the construction including -Miami Center Existing 3 the Southeast Financial Center. in accordance with all' icy n applicable codes, standards, and sound engineering and construction practices. Applicant shall permit the developers of Miami Center Existing and the Southeast Financial Center or fir agents. prior to commencement of construction and at reasonable times thereafter, to review the design criteria and - construction procedures for_eiscavne Plaz!to assure said deve102arsthat, such criteria and Procedures shall not adversely impact on foundations or cause settlement of those existing strugt3jr1s, 3. insert the following language at the end of the Development Order: Nothingf v to n rd r ha 1 i m i f or regtrigt i1i Mal wgy anv,2f therights w inn whelhir it r. �`*'.' + '^-i:: _4..a'i^.C"i�.aL.4...'T_.. U•CwS«={f'F J.fl i+:�.ac"F.�:�"i.:rsAAfLi+Ff.C�t�iCE3`a�hd+d�'Yi�k'Ltt�tSu_tvh:ik:79�:Yi�. ,. f .x .bf k.TL e�rs.e.,X;�s�+51��•'�t >("'G 11 j law or in ecuity including ti not lim$,tSd to the right to protect. structural integrity of all imgrovements -(al -,the located eft Miami Center Existinng and the Sou heast Financial , Center property: (b) the foundation support for such } r v m n s• an supply, sewage disposal, gravity runoff disposal and/or `? sgrawater drainage_systgms of Miami Center Existiria and the Southeast Financial Center. Language similar -to paragraphs 2 and 3 above has previously .,been submitted by Jeffrey Berkov..Esq. on behalf of the owners of Miami Center Existing. rs z 77777 • . Steel Hector & DivisYam BY HAND June 3, 1986 Mr. Joseph McManus Assistant Director City of Miami Planning Department 275 N.W. 2nd Street Miami, Florida 33128 • �.r Re: Miami Center I Biscayne Plaza �t Dear Mr. McManus: As you know, this law firm represents the owners of the northern developed portion of the property subject to the Miami Center I Development Order. Since the refiling of the application for the captioned matter at the beginning of May, we have been reviewing the Amended Application f for Development Approval and our clients have retained consultants to advise them on Biscayne Plaza's impacts on. their property. Accordingly, we are enclosing for your review and comment proposed substantive and technical amendments to the Planning Der::rtment's draft development order in connection with the captioned matter. We have based our amendments upon the proposed development order drafted by the department in February based upon our understanding that youfinal recommendations would be substantially r similar to that proposed development order. We only received the Department's May 30, 1986 proposed development order yesterday. We also have enclosed for your review copies `{ of reports from our structural and foundation engineer and from our environmental engineer. We previously have. furnished you with copies of reports from our consulting transportation engineers. The enclosed reports are based on the conceptual information provided in the refiled Amended Application for Development Approval. Accordingly, the proposed amendments represent, at best, only minimal protection from the impact of Biscayne Plaza on our client's property. Nothing set forth in the enclosed reports, or in the proposed amendments, is intended to limit, modify or restrict in any way any of the rights of the owner or owners of Miami Center Existing, whether at law or at equity. Furthermore, the present owner of Miami Center Existing specifically reserves all such rights, on behalf Of itself, its successors and assigns. *w Pv-. b"�.•�.;n CwKr Paw sr 0*,00 ww slob Worw;k6.-I - $4* Na :44 6,114* Fss. ;•�� ..y,�,�.a.,.ry :it•4r Ems•°46Naii3Mri.✓tiS®M k; All Z V_ 1 Cr_N:7_R zr.kZA Amendments to Resolution Number I in the second VCH"RELS clause, insert the date of t e I; I of the original A_­1,A for C-Enter 2. In the third WHEREAS clause, insert the sate of the -.Report and Recommendations of the South Flor- -4a 'z--4 :nal F-lanning Council. 3. In the fourth V::-R7:S clause, insert the date 0 1 —1 n.g of -he or4g4n-:_* A-D'% for 1141;ami Center I. 4. In the --ifth WHERE-13 clause, zpecify t.h.e re r sment s set fc.-th in ord_,,n._z:-ce Z 900 S. In the first 1-4.-.e of the sevrent*., WHEIRELS a, se, i.-Ser't the words "As originally" prior to the words "Przz--sed by insert the words "in 1979" after the words "*.-*.::lywel11 Corporation". 6. In the first line of the Sth !-.-:i_T.R'E-*S clause, delete t'"-- word "development" and substiv. to "Baft' 1 CU ..ange the word "unreasona1-01e" to e4 J,+ g t, e Feg-nr.i:.g wi _h - a thirteenth t=ER:.?zS c.a.ise, and t�rc �' the pre^used F.esc_u__cn, delete a'_1 references to :+:,w.. "A". Change Exhibit „3" to Exhibit "A"; change -xh:zit j: 4." = :n the fifteenth WH %-.;S cla:ase, change the word ... „ ,� "��`a•—�ing t�� remain::n g11 - c, .:7 the sixteenth ;: i RE:.S clause, insert a r re_erence to an attache exhibit containing a legal descr_ption for.: the "south.r:7 3.01 acres of the site' and defiring the - iL i o;•ct to be built .:7 t is land as the Eiscayne Fla_a Froject. r Ee^i^ .ing wi`'.7 'h is __zg:a�h, a::3 t?:rcuc :gut t 2 Fcesalution and _ .... SCa;:3 F' aza i_ct th_-4ts, substitute the Of the site" S u!iern 3.01 acresESE ii 10. in the fifth line of z%.-6e twentl e ,ause, ' ete t e word "subsequently' :n the seventh. line, delete the c:5 in a.1Ication for a Ya;or Use Special Permit and". 11. In the fourth line of the twenty-first tv Er.EnS clause, insert a cornea after "C:.a; :er 3SO.05 FSj'; in the same line, delete the wcrss as pertains to" and insert "which t ea::ests for"; • in the fifth line, delete the woos "t:3e southern _ fit r .t"il 3_rAS of tSite,8 _te, mot £`:_n;" and :..^.eeL't "t.^.'� :SCa}'oY$ a"a rolec` a '•ele:icn•tl { , i ;+"�3 ;_ � {' ..,_q:i,:�,:,.`-_5;:.a._v..Ywts'_...............:.•_:_Fa._..u._z._�.�e_....z...�_� .r... - - ___ - - - iA '3ti ut . :a the t;�e:zty-second D:E;EaS clausA, sub.:_,._ .. e the word "conditions" for the word "rc2ificati_ns". 13. In the second line of the twenty-fifth t-:='=.SAS dlause, charge the word it to to :n the th.r:: l:ne, :^sert the worm "has" before the ;cord "complied"; also in the third line, after "the northerly 5.45 acres of the site" insert a reference to an attached exhibit containing the 1--a-al des=ri'ptic:. of the developed portion of the property, and deli :: this property as "Miami Center Existing"; in the fifth line rsert the words "and the Miami Center I Development Order" after the words "Zo _ng Ordinance 6371"; beginning with t:e ifth mine, delete ::-.e words "southerly 3.01 acres of t':e site ..:ern as"; in the s...th line, delete the w::3s "Fhases 1 a:... Z" and 4nsert the word ":roject". ceyin:-iag . _th t^:is paragraph an- t'.:raughout the Resolution and Ex ibits, substitute "::ia-i C, :ter 7-ist:-ci" for "the north era 5.45 acres c_ t::e site" 14. :n the first sentence of Section 1 of t e Findings of Fact section, delete the word "project", and substitute to words "Biscayne Plaza Project". yhe word "applicant", as it -,s used throughout the entire develcpnent 'order, e1hould cc e`i::=d to :jean only the owner of the property presently owned by Center Zc_rt -Venture and to be devel^;:6d as "__5ca1:.e _ _aza". 15. :n he fifth :i::s of sect_,... 3 cf _1— ._...:,nvs c= .&Ct ze=ticn, chanYe ,:he k_ d to �y. Ji i RJ y S m:ri•+}• E 12. In the twenty-second W§EKE S cla-use, s=bltitute\< insect= the word "bas" before the wc=§ "complied"; also in t5e .E!=6 line, after "the rorthe=l- 5.45 acres of the site" insert <� ! - } � } a reference to an attached exhibit containing the legal \\ \ d©,--,'t±c: 0E the de-elo.=e6 porticn of the property, a.-d define:» # is property as "Miami Center Existing"; in the fifth li.e { Insert the words "and the Miami Center I Development Ordet" - alter the words "Zoning Ordinance ea71"; beginning With. thee £±Ith line, delete =Ee words 3.01 acres ;£ he site \\ \ \ _./gin as"; is the s.K=S line, delete the W==§s "25ases I an; and the word "Project". §e71= ng 2±=5 this parag=a@5� and hrough.o=t the Resolution and Ex:l51=s, ■=5s=itute ' . a=1 . . center Existing" for "the northern 5.45 a==23 =E tIze Site". 14. :n the first sentence of Sect' -on l of the Findings ? \\\\ of Fact section, delete the word "project", and subs ituzems 5e \ \\ wzrds "Biscayne Plaza Project". IEe Wore "applicant", as it is^ . used thrvagbo=t the enti-re develc=rent orde-, ■Eo=14 be ael±aea to mean only the owner of the 9=operty Irese:tly owned 57 Canter Joint 'Ventu e and to be dove/=ped as "Biscayne . 15. In the £±I=S I±ne of sect±== 2 or E■Q= 3,=.inn, cha&§e the w==3 to w &._#nning Ith the sixth line, delete *Che fcllowin, wards: "two ;arts: -_Exhi**Z1-;t "A" attached hereto and made a part of .his res:lution, pertaining to the entire 8.46 acres of Miami Center 2, and Exhibit iiBirattached hereto and made a part Cf 4s resolluton, pertaining only to the southerly 3.C11 acres of the site, known as the Biscayne -=-Iaza ::eject, Phases 1 and and insert the fs1__'ow_-ng: ":he form attached hereto as Exhibit per--aining only to the Eiscayne Plaza Project"; beginning with the e-le*.*enth line of this paragraph, delete everything from the words "the northern 5.45 acres" through the end of the parenthetical, and substitute the words "Miami Center Existing". 16. In se: --ion 3 of the F-J.-dings of Fact, chan-a =a. references in the fou--th 14 a erences to Exhik-: "C" to T-h.--%,it "B11; e , -Insert the words or in this Development Order" before th.e w o rd 3 "s'.nall be binding"; beginning wlzill the fcu,.­:h line, delete e,.,e__ry"_.h_4nq after the words "upon the owner of" -a the e-d o sentence, and insert "1.'-*.iami Center Exisming". 17. In the tenth line of Section 4 of the Findings of Fact section, delete "Exhibit on C with the 7 C, lerx, In Section 7 of the Find"ngs of Tact, 1,13-ert =he "anly" ;rlor to "binding"; delete the w^,--d a-p- can, z and "Zhe cwner 0-f B-1-azayne ?1aza Pry je-_t". 77 1: Tq I+. Amendmen,s to "=xhi=it '3'" 1. Delete the second paragraph on page 3. Insert a new paragraph regarding lack of need for a Major Use Special 2. In the third paragraph on page:3,'delete-the word 3. In the last 1_ne of Condition 4, delete the words "rxhibit 'A' of.this Development Order, as amended" and subst:t,.:te "of the c.:ginal-evelcpment Order dated .ray a 4. In the last line of Condition 3, delete the :;o_—ds S "Z....::;it 'A' of this 1evelopmert w-rder, as -.ended" and -ate of the original Develmpme nt Order :sated May _24, In the fourth line of Condition 9, c anae the cc, rma after "City" to a period and reword the remainder cf t..e paragraph as follows: "If an im—act see ordinance =er _aini ng to __re service is adopted by the City wit:.in the next five years, p.icant may, in the alternat., ive, pay a fair ..� are c .zr:.but:on '• • _r__an _ to such _:-pact fee ordinance" K r ; } 4 L S� �` ! - i, :,..t. .-. ---.. i� _ a�tt.:� s._ .I-aeed .>h:_ t+�„t,^4,ir�.•�.i�y��a+i i�+x.•<. ,.y"t4�1'_�kr nC.ty", ch.ange the Gonna to a period and reword the remainder c_ the paragraph as follows: "If an. impact fee ordinance pertaining to pciice facilities is adopted by the City within the next fire _ ears, ;pplicart may, in the alternative, pay a :air s :are contribution pursuant to such adopted irpazt fee ordinance". 7. In Condition 17d, after the table, delete the words ":n this event, fund s::all be made" and insert "Appiica nt shall make these funds". S. 3egi: r._::g w_th -herst line in Condition Ile, delete the words or a building permit for Phase _"; in the xourth line after t'.. _ words "i.Cr. Tod_f ca._:ns" insert the »c_ds if approved by EDO:" in the eleventh line=:.ange t e word "ad" to "all". k - 9. In the fourth line of C--ndit on 21, inser. the n word "only" after the word "runs"; delete the second a' i parenthetical and insert ", also known as the _iscavne Plaza Project, "; and in the sixth line, insert the Y:c_d "or_1 y" before t, the word "binding". :C. In the tenth line of Cop.::{ ticn 27, ch.a.nge : ne word "in„ to ,for„ . Ta y 11. In the eigb,th line cf Ccnlition 29, insert t::e wards "Bis:a-me Plaza 'Project" prier to the word "l-and". 12. Insert t!a following new Condition 30: Nothing set firth in this Development Order shall be '�indi-g in any way upon t::e owner cr owners of ':ia.,.i Center Existing, nor shall a::y.hing in this Development Crder increase the ch.igatiors cf such owner or owners of Miami Ce -ter Zyi t_rg under tr0 ori#nal Do-.►__ _ - _nt Order dated Vay 24, :9.79, as amended. M. t v 3 r _ �rc t ¢._ •fit•. - - C Et 33� Fff�: f t t -51 '1 .G; 3,�' e3 'Iff A;..,4vYF�� rs.3��f.x? �Su,• .��.�', if,n�Y�s - i '` __ J.1 ]`• — �-. k• _ .are... 17-A i. •4� M:Ar�:I CENTER PROPOSED SUSS_A..ICE A�:E�IDI•:EP;:S _0 _ • DEVELOPMENT OZDzR (EXzIE:T "B") t ri 16b. ;?resent Condition 16 becomes 16a) (New) Apoiicart shali :'7b. be permitted to construct parking facilities for up to _CCO parking spaces; provided, however, that if Applicant x constructs more than 800 parking spaces, suer: excess shall sr be furnished for the use of the owner or owners of Miami Center Existing in accordance with that certain Grant of f v Easements and Declaration of Restrictions recorded in Official Records Book 11102 at page 2247 of the Public - Records of Dad_- County, Florida. A.ppiicant shall pro vide r the owner(s) c' Miami Center Existing with unrestricted -access to such spaces. a f (:Jew) Nothing in this Development Order, or in any development permits issued pursuant areto, shaZ: .im,,it, modify or restrict in any way the rights of the owners of Miami Center Existing in and to an easement for parking purposes to be located on Biscayne Plaza property, pursuant to the terms of the Grant of Easements instrument described in Condition 16b. (Substitute) Prior to the issuance of .any bui:ding permit fcr enclosed areas cr parking in :lase I of S_scayne a. Ar - .AIL 4' ,SASS ft Plaza, in ,.he event that construction o. the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System has not begun, the s applicant shall fund or construct 100 percent of the 4` interim roadway improvements -identified as A(1), A(2), A(3) and A(4) in Attachment 5 (or suitable replacements mutually agreed upon by FDOT, Dade County Public Works `= Department ("County"), the City of Miami Department of PubliC Works, Applicant and SFRPC) pursuant to §380.06(_5)(e)2, Florida Statutes. y= 1:c. (Substitute) Within. sixty (50) days of the date of issuance of t�:a Development Order and p prior to the } issuance of an; building permits for enclosed areas -or ;} parking 2r. Pha_e : of Biscayne Plata, the Applicant sha11, , /.- using assumption and generation rates acceptable tc the `i County, FDOT and SFRPC staff, prepare and submit a f detailed traffic analysis documenting the proposed Biscayne Plaza project's impacts on the FDOT approved plan for the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated ham= System. Such ; analysis shall also include a recommended set of improvements to the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp .System and to the adjoining surface street system, permitting the Downtown Listributor Bifurcated Ra:,p System y F >; and the adjoining surface street system to operate at ' k ti acceptable le7eis of service during the :,.M. and F.M. peak Ir, , B=- y` r �•xJ... �..:. x. :. .; :.' .,-- -... „ ,: `.. .'- _ ... > ..r_ .._ t...f..,._ _s k...xa _..+_. $.k.. i; .�f:. ,;t.. :akY'�'��lx?� _ __ t 11 (Substitute) Prier to the issuance of any building permit for enclosed areas or parking in Phase I of Biscayne Flaza, the 1ppli:ant shall fund, bond or pro•:ide a letter of credit for $51.7,000 (1985 dollars) to FDCT, as the development's fair share contribution to the $9,763,000 (:985 Dollars) Brickell Avenue River Bridge replacement, pursuant to §3S0.06(i5)(e)2, Florida Statutes. (Substitute) Pi -or to the issuance of any building permit for enclosed a:-eas or parking in Phase II of Biscayne : Iaza, the App: _ =ant sna_ _ fund r bond : p r c :•rde a letter .... r of credit for S5,027,000 (_985 .:o.lars) to FDCT, as the development's fair share ccntri!:ution to the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System (total' cost estimated IF at $56 million in 1985 dollars) pursuant to §380.06(15)(e)2, Florida Statutes. !n the event the currently approved plan for the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System is Modified, the development's _air share contribution will be adjusted aceord_n 1y. (New) Prior to the issuance of a certif:zate of occupancy fcr Phase of B: scayne ' laza :.^. the e:'ent t at t Al a co^structicn of he Downtown Distrib;:t,;r Bifurcated F�ar:� ♦ w 7 9, in, X WA 77 s: aye t1 System has not -begun, the Applicant shall, uaing assumptions and generation rates acceptable to the County, FOOT and SFRSC staff, prepare and submit appropriate data and documentation affirmatively demonstrating to the i satisfaction of the City of Miami Pubic Works and Planning 7�eYartments, FOOT, County and SFRPC staff acceptable interim improvements (in addition to those interim immrovements described in Condition I"b above) to allow roadways to operate at levels of service acceptable `f to the City and County in the A.M. and P.M. peak hours 7t pending the conpleticn of Tina: traffic improvements. The .data and documantation shall also include projections acceptable to _ o City, FOOT, County and SFRPC 4 establishing wh_n implementation of interim solutions r� s :all be reeuired in whole or in part. Such projections - 3 shall be reviewed annually after ceginning of occupancy { and, when appropriate, modified by the City,.FOOT, County and SFRPC. Applicant (and not Miami Center Existing) r; shall pay its fair share contribution to the cost of ir..plementing the acceptable interim improvements. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for Fhase Y t of Biscayne Plaza, Applicant shall estimate in a manner i acceptable to the City or the County, such equitable share and bond that amount with the City cr the County. rrior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for Chase of Oiacayne Plaza, the Appl cant shal- obtain a commitment '�5.9tj?,.f, _.. ... - - _ .. .. t . ._ ..,. , r -.- .. h.. :. .. t I. 'N,.�..•�^� �..,�,.5. M�i!'a{Y3.�i'��J�� _ r on the part of the City and the County to implement the acceptable interim i..rpro:•ements by the time indicated by the projections. Copies of documents, data and commitments shall be sent to SFRPC and incorporated into -.he ;%.rn ended Application for Deve_opre ... Apr..:•al. (New) _rior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for Phase I of Eiscayne Plaza, the Applicant will fund _he following improt*ements to Biscayne Boulevard along the site which are necessary to accommodate Biscayne Plaza traffic: cons ruction of fi✓e traf.ic lanes on 3iscay^'e Boulevard froir Biscayne Boulevard 'ay to S.E. 2nd Street; dedication of _ny of its property fronting on Biscayne 'ouievard necessary for such five-_arings; and addition o: a third :eft _urn lane northbound __zm Eis_-ayne Bou_e:•ard U onto S.E. 2nd Street.NIf appro7ed _n.erim impro•.eme nts described in Condition 17h obviate the need for any of these improvements, such improvement(s) shall rot be : • requi red . t: a >r (New) Frior to the issuance of any bu=lding permit for � 5 • { enclosed areas cr parking in Phase II of Biscayne Plaza, the Applicant shall fund, bond or provide aletter of ,µ credit to FOOT for 100 percent of the costs cf roadway modifications, mutually agreed upon -.. FD0?, the City and ,, i Council staff, that predomi.^.art/y serge Biscayne Plaza Traffic. ,•.j _-k. (New) Prior to the issuance of any building perm:.: for enclosed areas or parking in Phase :i of Biscayne Plaza, _ n Distributor in the e•:e:.t that constructiono t e Downtown.._s,._ ?�R Bifurcated Ramp System has not been completed, the Applicant shall, using assumptions and generation rates acceptable to County, DOT and SFRPC staff, prepare and submit appropriate data and documentation affirinatiJely demonstrating to the satisfaction of the City of Miami �r Public Works and Planning Departments, FOOT, County and SFRP^ staff ac_eptable interim improvements (in addition to .,hose irate. --n lm=ro :eme. is rescrrr'er in Vondi ..icns _^Z and 17h above) to allow roadways to operate at levels of service acceptable to the City and County in the A.M. and P.M. peak hours pending the ccrpletion of the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System. The data and - documentation shall also include projections acceptable to the City, FDOT, County and the Council establishing when implementation of interim solutions shall be required in whole or in part. Such projections shall be reviewed annually after beginn^ g of occupancy and, when appropriate, modified by the City, E'JOT, County and Council. Applicant (and not Miami Center Existing) shall Pay its fair share contribu:ion to the cost of , k, k yx iy4 t"nY f (�T S�rrii r; .. -_ { implementing the acceptable interim improvements. Prior to the issuance of any building permit for Phase IT. of Biscayne Plaza, Applicant shall estimate in a manner acceptable to the City or the County, such equitable share and bond that amount with the City or the County. 6'..;ior to the issuance of a building permit for Phase I: of ?iscayre =.aza, the Applicant shall obtain a commitment on the part of' the City and the County to implement the acceptable interim improvements by the time indicated by the projections. Copies of documents, data and coma itments shall be sent to S_RPC a-tid incorporated into the Application for Development Approval. j, Y Prior to the issuance of a certi=icata of occupancy or :base I of Biscayne Plaza, in the event that corstr::ction ,z has commenced on the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp ~ System, the Applicant shall pay its fair share contribution for Phase I traffic impacts on the Downtown f L Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System. Such fair share contribution shall be credited towards the fair share amount established in Condition 17g. , Z!5b. (Substitute) Pursuant to §330.06(15)(e)2,-lcrida Statutes, withhold issuance of any building permits for Phase 1 of 2iscayne Plaza until a+l interim coed y w- G • 9 ' - imrrovements identified in At-ac::me^: 5 are constructed as = required by Condition .'b. 4 (Substitute) Withhold __suance of any building per-mits for 3 Phase of Biscayne Plaza until Applicant satisfies the s requ re=ent-s of Condition 17C. .. (Substi.te) Wit_ hold issuance of any buildi-g perm -;its :or y= Phase _ of Biscayne Plaza until the Applicant funds, bonds: Y.F cr pro:" -des a letter of credit for $51,,CCC (1985 dollars) pursuant to Conditior. _"A. 14 { 59. (Substitute) t:_.hh.c-d issuance of any bui.dirg permits for Phase iI of Biscayne F_aza until the=ppiicart funds, �.: s rds,cr pro:_.:es a letter cf :• for $5 C'- 0 _red+ ,. : = .: , , �CQ (1905 dollars) pursuant to Condition :7g. • 15h. (Substitute) If construction has not conmenced on the s- Do;;ntown Distributor bifurcated Ramp System, withhold ' issuance of any certificates of occupancy for the Biscayne Plaza Phase I portion of .he project until rpplicant has satisfied the re cmrairer.erts of Condition _7h. (New) with a:d. ::suance of any building permits f ' Phase I cf Biscayne Flaza un_11 the :pp.icart satisfies the �•; red,:-_ements of "o^ab. t -- aa_...ivn � S; - Ih i rezairements of Condition 17j. (New) if construction has not peen cor,.pleted on the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System, withhold any j building permits for -chase II of Biscayne Plaza u:;ti; the Applicant satisfies the requirements of ^ ^ 17k. 251. (New) Withhold issuance of a certificate of occupancy fcr Phase II of Eisca1ne Plata until corst;,jction is comp:emed x' on the Dow:.town Distributor Bifurcated lamp Syste" . 2_m. (New) Withhold issuance of a =ert"4 cate of cccupanz fcr Phase I of Biscayne Fiala if construction has coirmenced on the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System and Applicant has not satisfied the requirements _f D:rcition 171. In Attachment 5, paragraph 3 - after "warranted" insert: (provided, however, t:.at.such signalization does not prec:ude the approved sigrali_atior. of the Edward Ball Office 3u::ding parking garage exit, and such signa.lizat:on for the Biscayne �,. :laze ex:t sha►..1 be coordinated with t..e s_3: a_:;.a..ior. ... the _d:rard Ball Office Bu:ld:ng). 77 N : N ` - 9 11 .' insert the following language into the "safety and security" i - section of the Development•Order: J. t App:icant shall, at its own expe:ise, prc:•ide all necessary ;. measures ::: .,rder to prevent or mitigate any ad:•erse effects of the proposed construction of Biscayne Plaza on the foundations And structures of Niami Center Existing, in accordance with all V: i applicasie codes, standards, and sound engineering and construction practices. t insert the followir.;: language into'the "Environment" section of I -6e Development Orde_: nppl_cant shall, a: its own expense, ' i c_-o:•_de al+ neoessa:; measures ir, order to =re.ert or mitigate _ any adverse effects of the proposed cperation and or maintenance of Biscayne Plaza on t a water supply, sewage disposal, gravity runoff disposal and %or stor�wa_e .. drainage .age Systems of Miami Center Existing. =pplicant shall perform ail such necessary measures in accordance w:z all applicable codes, {, standards, re -;:• regulations, and sound e. irc..m-ntal, site i _ • .N - eng neer_ng and construction practices. - :nsert "he following language at the end of the Development t Crder: Date: t• Tim h Author: Client Name:' - ! Client Number: Matter Number: Title of Document: Deadline: Type d Print Draft: Revise as Marked & Print Draft: Revise As Marked & Print Final. --- Single Spaced: Double Spaced: 8'h x i t Draft: 811 x 14 Draft: 814 x 11 Cranes*: 81h x 14 SHD: 814 x 11 Memo: 819 x 14 Cranes': 814 x 11 Firm: Billing Paper: Firm Letterhead: •Plsln Crams Crest Tape Attached: Transcribe Side 1 2 Special Instructions: Ptease Contact Author For Instructions: (Ext. zr j FOR WORD PROCESSING USE ONLY: Date: <�j% Time: Initials: Document Number: � �3' 22 MIAMI CENTER I!BISCAI'SE PLAZA St'%V,APY.OF PROPOSED ShBSTA%TIVE AME1D%lE%TS TO TRANSPORTATION RELATED CONDITIONS 17 b PLANNING DEPARTMENT: Draft condition does not include-FDOT and Dade. County Publit Works Department in deiermining suitable replacements for identified interim roadway improvements. PROPOSED CONDITION: Includes these two agencies in the process. 17 c PLA':':?NG DEPARTME%T: Draft condition does not require the applicant to identify any improvements to the FDOT approved Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System. PROPOSED CONDITION: More fully defines the required traffic analysis and requires that the applicant identify and fund any necessary improvements to the FDOT plan. 1, f PLA''NING DEPARTMENT: Draft condition does not require the applicant to provide its fair share funding for the Brickell Avenue Bridge Replacement if a public sector financing package is committed before December 31st of 1991. PROPOSED CONDITIO": Requires the applicant to fund its fair share regardless of the existence of a public sector financing package. 17 S PLANNING DEPARrIH.NT: Draft condition does not require the applicant to provide its fair share funding for the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Rscp Svster; if a public sector financing package is co .itted before December 31st of 1991. PPOPOSED CONDITION: Requires the applicant to fund it_ fair share regardless of the existence of a public sector financing package. 17 h PLANNING DEPAP.TMENT: Draft conditions have not addressed the possibility that additional interim roadway improvements may be required if construction of the Downtown Distributor has not begun prior to occupancy of Phase I of the project. PROPOSED CONDITION: Addresses this possibility and defines in detail the procedure for identifying and funding these possible additional interim improvements. 17 1 PLANNING DEPART'IENT: Draft conditions have not addressed the funding of certain roadway improvements to Biscayne Boulevard which were assuaie.•d in the applicant': traffic FF'(iF'OSfl► CU':D1TlON: Address('!- this- issul by rLquirihL t..e applicant to fund the five laronE of I41sc:o%-ii( 1K)41E'tLtrd fror:, Vav tC- .,.L. .. . .`:ILt-t. ti v 211 3 - '`. s� 17-j PLAMI\G DEPARIMEM Draft conditions have not addressed the South Florida Regional Planning Council's recommended condition 15 which required the applicant to ' " ... fund, bond, or provide a letter of credit to FDOT for 100% of the costs of roadway modifications ... that exclusively serve Biscayne 1 Plaza traffic ". PROPOSED CONDITION: Requires the applicant to fund roadway modifications that predominantly serve Phase II of the project. � 1 k PLANNING DEPAFI%iENT': Draft conditions have not addressed the possible ' need for interim roadway improvements in the event 4 that Phase II of the project is constructed prior to construction of the Downtown Distributor Bifuraated Ramp System. _ PFOPOSED CONDITION: Addresses this issue by requiring the applicant to identify and fund its fair share of Phase II y interim roadway improvements. 1 .'1 PLAN\ NG DEPAPTME' : Draft conditions have not addressed the possibility that the applicant could construct only Phase I of the project and never be required to provide its -` fair share funding for the Downtown Distributor Aj - Bifurcated Ramp System. PROPOSED CONDITIO':: Addresses this issue by requiring the applicant to. fund its fair share for i:,ase I traffic impacts on the Downtown Distributor fifurcated P.anp Syster, ii construction of the ramp s}•ster,, begins before the occupancy of Phase I of the project.' r ti > s: � f .,s o. , _r u k �- meco %10TCHKr''.'i'Z ENGIEvEERIII ; COMPANY Engineer!nq • I lych-6rog!; • piann!!-,,�, • S6 nce Dear Mr. McManus, I have been asked Jeffrey Bercow, Esq., Steel Hector and Davis, attorneys f_r M.C. Holding Partners, owners of the �'. Existing Miami Center No. 1 project, to write to you regarding the subject matter. My firm has the pleasure of serving M.C. Holding Partners as site civil and environmental engineering consultants for the Existing Miami Center No. 1 project. we have had the opportunity to review a number of relevant - documents regarding this situation before making an assessment of the potential for adverse impacts to the Existing Miami Center No. 1 project resulting from the proposed development of the Biscayne Plaza project. our studies were based upon the review of the following documents, among other engineering- information available from the owners files and the public records (i.e. permit agency files): 1. The original ADA/DRY for the project - refered to as the Miami Center DRI. 2. The amended ADA/DRY for the project - refered to as the Biscayne Plaza DRI. 3. The City of Miami Development order for the Miami Center 4. The City of Miami Proposed Development Order for the Biscayne Plaza DRI. 5. The staff report and recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council regarding the Biscayne Plata DRI. Our investigations have also included site. inspections and discussions with various regulatory agencies including the 1 t � -.- .............:.....,...........:..L..."....:..�......«.,�,....ya«M�w..w .Mcrc��uts�uosywmvaem�.z _- i 'i Joe McManus - June 2, 1986 Page 2 Florida Department of Environmental Regulation, Dade County Department of Environmental Resource Management, and Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Authority. Please find enclosed, for your information and use, two copies of our report of findings regarding certain engineering and environmental matters related to potential adverse impacts to the Existing Miami Center Project as a result of development of the proposed Biscayne Plaza project. _ We must say that we had a somewhat difficult time in evaluating the water, sewer and drainage issues regarding this project for the following reasons: not sufficient information (drainage and water and sewer calculations were not included in the Biscayne - Plaza DRI) was provided, and; conflicting data appears in various sections of the Biscayne Plaza DRI report, SFRPC staff report and the preliminary City Development Order. In addition, information _ regarding this overall project we obtained from public records indicates other apparent differences in the water and drainage facilities as compared to the information included within the `5 Biscayne Plaza DRI. 'f Therefore, in reaching our conclusions on these matters we used the best available information, in our estimation, and made conservative judgements as to the evaluation of the existing situation and the extent of possible problems with and. adverse - impacts to the existing Miami Central No. 1 Project which would be associated with development of the Biscayne Plaza project.. Our concerns regarding. the Biscayne Plaza DRI; Project are summarized below for your information and convenience: 1. Will the development of Biscayne Plaza cause increased flooding or flooding related hazards to the Existing Miami Center: No. 1 project? 2• Will the on -site sewer lines serving Existing Miami Center No- 1 be sufficient in capacity to convey the expected increased flows (beyond those expected in conjunction with the oringinal Miami Center DRI submittal), resulting from development of the c of the Biscayne Plaza Project? 3. Has the drainage system been adequately designed, in conjunction with the drainage needs for Existing Miami Center No.. 4 for the increased runoff impacts of Biscayne Plaza (as compared to the original Miami Center DRI) so as to prevent, - flooding at Existing Miami -Center No. 1 and Biscayne Boulevard,, and prevent discharges to Biscayne Bay for storm events more frequent than the 25 -year design storm? 5 __....i.__,�._....,............wb ,•tep..ya•_nm»xe�-ft�..sY:S..o.::"�"':m::.Zr:...e' u'uiwa'a'iX'ii:�! �v.e:diil `-•,U'yy �.�r.�3.s--nlilav: - "�s&P_'a`Cwt'l{fLiY Joe McManus June 1, 1986 Page 3 4. will the water main extension proposed in conjunction with the Biscayne Plaza project be connected to the 24" main along Biscayne Boulevard and then tied back into the existing 12" water main along the back (Bay front) of Existing Miami Center No. 17 We look forward to working with you and the City of Miami in assuring that the development of the Biscayne Plaza Project can be undertaken without adversely impacting the Existing Miami Center No. 1 Project. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions or require any additional information regarding these matters. It is my understanding that Jeffrey Bercow, Esq., other consultants and I will be attending the City Hearing on the Biscayne Plaza project scheduled for June 4, 1986. We will be expressing our concerns regarding the potential for adverse impacts of development of the Biscayne Plaza Project as related to the Existing Miami Center No. • 1 Project as discussed in the enclosed report and' reports prepared by other consultants. We will be requesting that our concerns be addressed by the developer or that adequate safeguards be required of the developer of Biscayne Plaza Project to prevent adverse impacts to the Existing Miami Center No. 1 Project. We regretfully note that the representatives of the developers of the Biscayne Plaza project have apparently declined offers by Jeffrey Bercow to meet and discuss the areas of concern which exist regarding the proposed development. As such, we have to raise our concerns regarding this project to you and plan on making presentations at all hearings on this project until. the Development Order conditions are modified to provide adequate safeguards against adverse impacts to the Existing Miami Center No. l project caused by the proposed Biscayne Plaza Project. We are hopeful that the Biscayne Plaza Project can be developed in such a manner so as to prevent adverse impacts to the Existing Miami Center No. 1 Project, while providing the maximum benefits for the City of Miami. Respectfully submitted, MECO i.bert James Motchkavitz, P.E. Florida registered Professional Engineer Florida F.E. No. 23302 cc. Jeffrey Bercow, Esq./Mike Raydell Rudy Fre tz 3 1 MUD, .1 MOTCHKAVITZ ENGINEERING COMPANY �.► Engineering • Hydrology • Planning • Science j :3 ` fit' __ i..`:E R jAD. MIANC. FL :o T__ R=PCRT OF FINDINGS r=—cAitEL = CR M.C. HCLZ:NG PARTNERS B'T: RCEE JAMES %*OTCLKf,VI:Z, P.E. F�CRI_�s P.E. NO. I?3CI =".ES Cr. PC:ENT:AL IMPACTS TO MIAMI CZ'N":ER NCO C?►'�'ti: _PLAZA DRI APPLICATICN �. ..Ir.:•:I , D+,:.E �V�I::T'S , F LvRIDA AMDEK 3v, l9°6 F '''•��_ NO. 1� - F.I. 'IRONMENT AND NATURAL RESC::ROES: W Erg. ------ i The }jam m" Center r— `nr" ♦ ..r.__ +.. v . r -c-41 � ._a _ Ce _e DRI repo _ _ca�eZ -..�_ the __a._t� _.....,__ d_z=csal wells would be drilled tc a de_tz cf approx_m3ze_, tc Based upon information ottained cn the FCER - West Palm. j Beach, for the wells installed in ccn; ::notion wit - .e M-i an Center project and the Southeast F.nanical Center, wells at _:is !: site will be on the order of 90' to 1-00' ".^. de .. de^.t:.S fGr •+3 st:rmwater disposal wells in the area rance fro- o?' tc 114'. developer of the Biscayne Plaza Pro;e_t should be recurred to evaluate the existing drainac: system a.—d install any additional f wells required to process the drainage discharges frdm the I' project, based upon the overall project contributory area, i.e. !' Existing Miami Center No. 1 and Biscayne Plaza. In accWrfarce � ..:th currant accepted engineering practices, the ccntributzry area considered in the design should included 1/3 cf t o largest I exposed +ace of each structure on the project site to account far �! blown rain which is intercepted by the bu:.:d nrs. =�e dept::, size and ccnstrurticn of any additi:.nal wells required process drainage from tals protect s:.cu:d confer- to all C:--= stancar--s e. DEr:•: and the Grid- De;a=*rent of _... _r-nnenta, Re^ulat;.cn. Each of the we _s insza:.lez sh u:=g te �. s �e�. :.C.':t� r'•i t nat the design disc*-arge --a;a--- " can oe See `rai-ace sec ion ., elcw fc_ ad," ticna' •: syr �s r, : , ._.. .74.4d z.Y� well .... kw � t F �t< `T :sS ES OF CONCERN PC_ENTIA►L IMPACT'S TO MIAMI CE,`"_'ER NO. 1 B:SCAYNE PLAZA AMENDED URI APPLICAT:0N MA: 3.0, 1986 PAGE 2 NO. 17 - ENV:R0'NMEN7 AND NATURAL R SCURCE S: F:DCDPLA.:ti' l ?0YEAR -------------------------------------------- P.T.,w,IN A�ti7 VEiCCTV ZONE I-....V. E 4 The Miami Center and Biscayne Plaza ORI submittals indicated t.at t e rrc;ect site was located within Federal F:ccd Zcre "A►-:�" with a ,base flood elevation of i14.00' NGVy. This was t::e correct flood irfcrina_icn f:.r the Miami Center :,R:, but does not reflect current tend -=:ens which would govern development of the =.iscayne rlaza project. .he current Flood :rsurance Rate Map for• the prefect area, _denti_ied as Comr:.::nity Panel Number 125098-0:91-D, as prepared by the National F:ocd Insurance Prcgram, is dated (Revises) anuary 9, 1984. This map identifies the prc:ect area as : eing within a Federal F._cc Zone ".1-14" with a base f:ocd e:evatic- cf --::.00' NG,,'D. See _::closed ex-ibit. f_ocd zone is defined by the Nat---na: Flccd Insurance :rocram as being an area which :a s;:d;ected to coastal flooding wi-: velocity (wave attic.^.) ccnL.;:eraticns. A copy cf a por -4c c`_ th.e FIRM map whichcovers tre prcJett area :s inc:uded as an attachment hereto. Generally speaking, the design of structures within a "V" - flood zone must meet stricter standards than those required for projects within "A" - flccc zones. 71,e Dace County Zoning Code and County Ordinance 77-32 essentially prohibit development below the minimum base food elevation, in a "V" flood zone. It is our understanding that any habitable or commercial development proposed :.slew the mi ni:nu.►n rase flood elevation would require variance ccnside_a:.ion and approval. The Biscayne Plaza CRI correctly indicates (trot the min -mum :ode County grades for the project area are at elevation �5.0' (see enclose: exhibit). The Biscayne Plaza DR! _ndicates that the developer is planrir.a to ccrstruct a Say Walk retail shop:ing area alorg the bulkhe:.d at elevations equal to cr just aWove ;.he Dace Cou:.t1 elevation requirements. As such, t Ine deve:cp-ent cf the BiWcay.-; plaza Bar Walk retail area as ;enera-11%? ceszribe^ in t-e Biscayne elcza DR:. would likely c• .� c ...,., t r •. • o 1 - :egM....e`tui.lhding fin-i-s.red rr•.cr variances =4 c-_. s uc J4.Cn bes.COW s, case foccc elevations in a v-:OcitY zone. l II r` �. A } .. r` I-S�ES OF CCNCEFV - POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO MIAMI CENTER NO. 1 EISCA's:�tE PLAZA AMENDED DR: APPLICATION r 30, 1986 }` CAGE 3 3a -' ..... C..� tiC. 17 - FLCCOPLAINS: CONTINUED *he Dade County Flood Control Division has indicated, in 5' te:eprore discussions, that they are presently reviewing finished :=ccr variance requests in the project vicinity, and it is _i:at _he variance requests included pertic ns of the =isca1ne Plaza project. ne Biscayne Plaza DF apprcval should note that deve:zpmert o_ F;= _aLili.ies below the minimum base flood elevation are s:.b;ec_ to ;,- an-, necessary variance approvals and that the L-: approval is nom --_ended* to provide the developer of Biscayne Plaza with any enccura_ement or "vested rights" with regard to ary proposed =} residential or cocrarcial development be_ow tre current mi.^._ um 311 `locd levels and 1c_al design standards/requirements. The DRI approval should a-!-:. note that the developer o: Discalre Plaza � -»st show that deve:cpment of facilities below the r. i nimw^i base ._ccd elevation w__1 not damage or othe:w4se threaten adjacent a -rtperties or deve;,.z;ment in the case of a s_-r- event, and, :r tie developer of Biscayne Plaza should describe the methods to be used tz protect adjacent pro:ert_es against potential damage from -�. flcodi^= considerations resulting frc- development of a �.. Eisca.:ne Plaza Project. . .;r3 _SSUES.OF CONCERN - POTENT_AL IMPACTS TO M.IAMI CENTER NO. 1 E=SCAYNE PLAZA AMENDED DRI APPLICATION `M.A': 30, 1986 rnv- 4 S':ICN NO. d1l - PUBLIC FACI:.i=ES: WASTEWATER MANAGF..wNT :NCREr,SE =N S=RV:CE RZQU.ZREMENTS The methods used for calculating wastewater (sewage) genera ion in Biscayne Plaza DR: report does not fo:low standard an.; accepted Miami Dade Water and Sewer Authority (WASA) calculat:.ors. We have therefore evaluated the wastewater ccntrib.:_icn cf the original project (Miami Center DR_) and the T pr-pose.. ceve_opment (E-scayre Plaza DR. give.. existing deve:cpmert cf Miami Center No. 1) gi:•en the prcposed;exis_irg uses for the protect using wASA calculatizrs. Those ca:culaticrs are attached hereto as exhibits to this report. The proposed Bicayne Plaza DR-- protect (existing Miami Center N'c. and Biscayne Plat_ Project) will require apprcxi:ratelt ad,:i_:onal ga::on. t_y sewer capacity as compared to the Miami Center DRI project (Miami Center No. 1 and prcpesed c_—ndcm_n_•_n deve:c-,meat) This additional f low amounts to a 22.1_1 % increase .over the Miami Center DRI protect requirements. Eased upon letters from W%SA inclu4,ed in the Miami Center and Biscayne Plaza DRI applications, and cur evaluation of the sizes of existing oofsite receiving facilities, it appears as if there is sufficient capacity to process the additional flows expected } to be generated by the proposed Biscayne Plaza Project.. u' CAPACITIES OF EXISTING FACIL:TIES ISSUE --------------------------------------- Given the "as -built" sizes and slopes of the gravity sewer lines at the subject project we have determined the normal operating capacities (75% full sewer lines) of the sewer lines along the Eay and Biscayne Boulevard sections of the sewer collection system serving Miami Center No. 1 and the proposed Biscayne Para project. The Bay front sewer lire, which primarily serves the Miami Center F--tel and the commercial s:.cpping area between the Hic tel ar.d the ::ia-i Center Office Bu- ldi-a, and is extended to serve the Biscayne Plaza project, has an operating (75% full) capacity cf approximately 875 g-e , based upor: a 12+1 140ne at a r1CWe of C."61*40-6 ftrft. ^ .e maximum flaw of this sewer 11:a is a -'-cut cgs grm. 02W. _ - `7 si r --,F :SLUES OF CONCERN - POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO MIAMI CENTER NO. 1 KSCAYNE PLAZA AMENDED DRI APPLICATION rf Ri Y 30, 1986 ' stsGE u�: `SY 4. �V.;ES-d^N NO. I: - WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT: C^NTINu=O r�V ^ns'dr -^ the Miami Center Hotel and commercial area, and iscayre Plaza Phase I devlopment, a total of approximately r 26::,200 gpd of sewage will enter the Bay front sewer line. Assuming that the 80% of the average flow will occur in an 16. ."cur period and that peak usage will be 4 times the average flow, it :s determined that peak flow for this line will be approximately 87; gpm. This is approximately 10C% of the operating capac4t7 of the sewer line. ._ is r�.cm.^.ce.^.de3 that the Bay front sewer line should not operate at over 90% of t're operating capacity at peak flows. As suoh, .ortr:cuticn from the proposed Biscayne Plaza project to r' the Bay fror._ sewer line should be limited to a maximum of approximately 70,COG gpd to limit peas flows to approximately 90% K> cf average operatinz capacity of the Bay front sewer. The Biscayne Boule•: and sewer line extension serves the Miwmi Center Office project, and is extended tz serve tre Biscayne Plaza project, has an operating (75% full) capacity cf approximately of approximately 1175 gpm based upon a 12" line at a slope Of 0.00866 ft/ft. The maximum flow of this sewer lire (133% full) is about 1,285 gpm. Considering the Miami Center office Building/Garage and ,the -rzzosed Biscayne Plaza Phase I+ development, a total of apprcximately 180,350 gallons of sewage will enter the line in a, day. Assuming that 80% of the average flow occurs in a 16 hour period, and that peak flow will be 4 times the average flow, the Peak sewage lead in this lire will be 601 gpm. This flow amounts to only 51% of the computed operating capacity of t;.e Biscayne Boulevard sewer line. As such, the excess sewage contribution from the Biscayne Plaza Phase I development could be rerouted to the Biscayne Boulevard sewer line so that the Biscayne Plaza project could be implemented without reductions in the develcz ent Program of Fctential adverse impacts to the Bay front sewer line. :ue to the large anticipated sewage loads on the Bay front sewer an ;.he sewer line's c:.ose proximity tc Biscay a Bay, a reg'w'la, program of inspection (beyond that whic:: may be performed ; bg WASA) and cleaning, as needed, should be rec•,:ioed of t e Biscayne Plaza developer as part of the DRo r ,ISSUES OF CONCERN - POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO MIAMI CENTER NO. 1 B:-CAYNE PLAZA AMENDED DRI APPLICATION MAY 30, 1986 PA3E 6 "-S7:0 NO. 22 - PUBLIC FAC::.:TIES: DRA:NAGE WE:.. CAPACI�'i=S -------------- The Mia^;i Center and Biscayne Plaza DRI reports indicate that the to gra•:4_1 disposal wells are assumed to be able t: discharge 2,000 g:•^ at 2.5' of head. Information obtained from discussions with F.:ER indicate that the wells installed at this site were ::0" _n diameter. zased recent experiences in this general area, any'. cur disc;�ssicns with a well drilling contractor, it iS our understanding that =ven 24" diameter wells in his area will nct generall• ide f__ discharges in excess of "500 gpm with Z.5' cf head. we woul_ ass,=e that 20" diameter wells in this area wi:h 2.5' of head k :::ld provide fcr approximately 2,.::J grmr. cf .... r y NEED FCR SYSTEM IMPRC'.'=..%!EN.. S ---------------------------- Based upcn the art:cipated discharge capacity of the wells, as described above, we have evaluated the reed for drainage system crcvements to process runoff from design storm conditions wic:.out allowing for overflow outfall to Biscayne Bay. we have terfor:ned calculations based upon the existing conditions, the Miami Center DRI conditions, and proposed Biscayne Plaza DRI conditions. Given the assu:,ned well capacities (2,250 gpm at 2.5' head), the number of existing wells (total of 7), and the available storage in the rock filled seepage trenches (7,313 CF) correcting all wells at the site, we have determined that additional drainage improvements will he needed to accc:nodate runoff from the development of the Biscayne Plaza DRI project. Based upon the information available to us, we would suwc_est that at least 3 additional 20" (minimum diameter) gravit,, wells would requ: red to be installed in cc jurctic�, with the development cf the Wisc_:.•..e Plana DRI project to satisfy current drat :age rermit requirements. It should also be required that any accr:::.^::z: wells insta :led in con;urct:.c% w: -%', tte B :sca: ne Flaza srcject be i.ntercon ected to the existing perimeter .._linage culvert s•_s,.em wr.=. runs through F.Y...s .-c t.-ani CE--E2• wY�_�,�. A; -A E"_^_ own g:.ch wells s:.cul C• he within The grading c! the Biscayne Plaza project should be required to be per!=ned in such a =ashion as to protect the Miami Center Nc. 1 :rcect area from flocding. To these ends, it should be required that the Bay walk area in the Biscayne Plaza Project be graded away frcm the Existing Miami Center Bay walk and that a h:gh spct (apprcximatel7 6" above the existing Miami Center may :SS::ES CF CONCERN - PCTENTI�%, IMPACTS TO M:AMI CENTER NO. 1 S:SCA= PLAZA AMENDED DRI APPLICAT':CN tir►y 3C, 1086 _^^ 8 Q;;ES::CN Nam. I3 - PUBLIC FAC:L:TIES: WATER SUPPLY INCREASE -------------------------------- :N SERVICE REQU:REMENTS !-ease refer to Question No. 21 for a discussion regarding the Me: ecs used to compute project water demands, and a summary of the expected increase in wa_er;sewer service resulting from the pr_pcsec Biscyare Plaza project. Attention is also directed to the a tac^.ments surimarizirg the sewer and water requirements of tie Miami Center DR: project, and the Biscayne Plaza DRI project, ry :.e. t a exist_:g Miami Center Project and the proposed Biscayne { CC.INECT: C:l TC 2411 W;'ER MAIN :N B: SCAvNE BOULEVARD -------------------------------------------------- water system i---ove"ierts associated with the Biscayne F_aza project should inc:uce the following as ccnd1ticns to the DRI` 1. Connection of the existing 12" water main along the Bay front at t e south end of Existing Miami Center No. 1 to a ^^inimu.T 12" water rain extension to ser•.e the Biscayne Plaza project. . 2. Connection of the 12" minimum water main to serve the =_:scayne Plaza Project to the existing 241' water main (not the existing 12" water main) on the west side of Biscayne Boulevard at the southwest corner of the Biscayne Plaza project.. FOSS:BLE CONSTRUCTION PROBLEMS - INSTALLAT.ON IA N AREA CF BULKHEAD ----------------------------------------------------------------- TIE- BACKS AND "DEAD MEN" ------------------------- The developer of the Biscayne Plaza project shcu_d present, or should commit to as a condition of the LRI, acceptable engineering/construction methods to allow fcr :.r.stallat:cn cf a water main, acceptable to Miami Dade WASA and all other. Per:^ittong agencies, withi- the rear (southern and eastern most ccunda:ies) of the project given the fact that existing tie -backs and dead man are expected to be within l ' to 20' c! the bulkhead - ne. The water main extensicn along the southern and eastern bout all Cf the Biscayne Plaza prc3ect, to be connected to the Miami Center No. 1 GeJe1C;. erit, S..C.._d be a PGb ..�..� ..-••..�•• r and c erated bs. the *.!:,•rSA. L.1 a z EXHIBITS 4 1 s k w m :t A A m S P -F! N4 A -A, iA .ems 'S-�'•aC� oc Z On A Zdppg SOUTH r ------------------ DADE COUNTY OWNER: GENERAL HIGHWAY MAP M.C. HOLDING PARTNERS, FLORIDA MIAMI, FLORIDA ENGINEER: MIAMI CENTER NO. I MECO ENGINEERING CO.� MIAMI, FLORIDA FLOPICf-&- � CT ` A. .e'�*. .Y "� ;. +'•Y:`• ♦ . 'r .' .� :..,. ., •r_ia r': ,:.thy ,�wM_ - -t. ft t� °!!:' >s R { �'lS�: � j •� �L.� �ati �t�,�b'+��fJJY'•. �i.'.. •k;'- �i `y • • t 3' ..-_c-` �'2ANE�0.1 � *fir_ �" }t•�" tii R� x, );r at-` t z T , ,�•i .4 ,�rY, ,» r •�c • f , :.�; 't,,, .yef "• i;'* ++� "•!'•s�*'y* r � :s+'.'ti«y 't'S �i r�' 4 �� ..Y .•* :���•C� r. ,.a•. ��+. � <f`. �t. Z 5T LEE, r� r jti '.yT i f T i' :G . i.y.. w y '.�f.,fJr ..��� � i etR ryE • t. •Yr �+..' 1 v W R 051. rJ' ll. r f in . �: :SAC rc j.• ;�►r4 -�" Zi- .�,. •1 p ig:'' a' "• r '` `�:i•,•.:swi"w a �.:� �4yyy! A r T7 t "� shy ifi'jjpt�;� r, w ��`•'• 'mot � ... � .. too _ an `- '�. • •,� Ou�IFngeme iitsari, ..., �+, k. N f - _• -.w�� +�, Jay 't�<' �: r. T , � y a• f t e . ; . K) � ��� JT LL a �,:'r`.0 L Y' ` : : ,. .e ..rw'. •+''.- of q d IF ? I `'!ye:'i•aar J / :l. ':.•♦ i�j r �' .t. ,1 ! •ry� .l'. : t` a`a •'t, r' •.�,'; ^�, ;.'' Y,J:•Ay: `d'F' y" a`. /�` .., . _ .`w'. uq.•wA` � „c• aa.aa..t'71 .. ... :',cai ;r �.:•. _ w.JaJ �eK..: eiii�°m"r. �•":!G_ a ° �'• r OWNER: F.I. .M. FLOOD MAP M.C. HOLDING PARTNERS MIAMI, FLORIDA ENGINEER: MIAMI CENTER NO. 1 MECO ENGINEERING CO MIAMI, FLORIDA MIAMI. FLORIDA • . . r • lur• f_. �• .ate dol NN to 00 65 rl 53 r� ' �i t-T urfav go .,:�. If t •-yRV _ A.� r w0000•: .1 ,• _ -r. So he of zi 1 416- 000 it it • \ b �. • / �� �vrw � E•r a '+�O-•�— i-�: - -S4 4!%r _ ��" .ale .� 54-42 t PROJECT LOCATION i S�+ O ._ ` "—� STAND -- �/ AR®FOR lat• •: UU. a•a.s t.l•Nrw L• 10 .r - MIN • • «J•C tl::saa. a••. IS •: •.. •s. •t t•:!•• FINISHED GRADE c1 t : •• !. a.•.:. t•..t•�•f •I •a tt .�. _ !•D/:: c.•1•iCe••,• f`•.: •..1 •.l•t.tt.:I f•Ia..6st1 t Ce: t• .�• • t :••f •a••.aa, •sa. ••i .tt• CI ��aa.•••OC' a•l•.a♦ ..C• to toll.• .1 'f••/'••lf• — �_a •I •al0••`l N•t ••.. - tt•••♦ t-IL .• .Ot ft �'' ' t .. 1.l • e/ u.a•..t •ln ra./ 1: •, 1 .f f • ••:•U• t• on• f•a•• t 1.1 •ortet Yt. 0•'0•.. •{t• OWNER: DADS CO. FLOOD MAP M.C. HOLDING PARTNERS MIAMI, FLORIDA T. MIAMI CENTER . I �:�tGItJEI R; ' MIAMI. FLORIDA EA VA PA t . F it C R I C? Al►:� _. �a r _Y :.t_uCZzL - ._': /[ 11 ; ! Ie1 /11I0 rr ,. � mow••.• �•� � I .. A F I• [. I•�j /J •. I, �. f �\ 0�....••,.�«•.ter.. ............. � + • [ i rw . _ �_. . ,.�• qt r1•f0• • f. Hb .� f i.ir r W ` ,\ � � f 1, � flflr• —Y � I • 53 42 •;• a e1 .,:.. •i �— / 7 f..e1r , STANDARDS FOR MIN. FINISHED GRADE 31 • w •err � we of f PROJECT LOCATION .mow /,.,• a.:•r•. r • r.r /.f ••^. � ::• !/ •♦ .. c NG,t tlf :,Y,♦ •r••fi •: •.. ••r,f l•Ci •• f 0609 C: r,•IY ftr•Y:. 9•P,; •„PI •Yl •Y *ft• :I 1•I P.. Ptfi l,lr•,GG• •rl•„• • [-•f1 rr,• 01 •Yt• Pi I r r l.l• CI of ....A 000 04.0 - f 1.1 •►,•:rt ♦1. P•'Ow. •Iff U.C.YraP OWNER: DADS CO. FLOOD MAPS ._fHOLDING PA TN MIAMI, FLORIDA ENGINEER. n�A INI teeIAMI. FLORIDA as e C e" I AK ro I i. t , EXIST. GRAVITY BISCAYNE BAY SEWER, TYP. ..� W } W uj a •O NS y fz p W } W d. N W W I Z W V (A m Q ll oc y doo-6 W T J W V� O p m a Z Icc F" ac. op �� o• Nr O W Na W • . N" i sc r x a W W e y i 813CAYNE„"f�' BLVD. ur__ BISCAYNE W (W ; ;Zi 'c I 44 N do � . W (A to 0 O Q W 30.3:4- W.N Z: . INC t- oqr H W ®a OWNER:SEWAGE COLLECTIONv.C. HOLDING PARTNERS MIAMI CENTER NO. 1 MIAMI, FLORIDA MIAMI. FLORIDA ENGINEER: MECO ENGINEERING CCU yv.. BISCAYNE BAY mop z dc am Q us .. Z Q aa. < O N P-.` N A W S ul ol z W W luW cc 7 oc I. N i � K d do 30 N K < �� W W ® m J C7 d ® 0 4 Z x 30m am cc 4 N W ~ � d T� _ w t� J ' 'BISCAYNE 1 I12' MAIN BLVD._ � A' BISCAYNE s WATER DISTRIBUTION OWNER: M.C. HOLDING PARTNERS SYSTEM j MIAMI. FLORIDA + MIAMI CENTER NO. 1 ENGINEER: ti .MIAMI, FLORIDA MECO ENGINEERING CO WATER/SEWER ATTACHMENTS - - ' l.IMMAF2 v -b1A f t'Fi!';F:I•i["F, Fcl:o tt'.1Lxmcm r > Peo it ro,TAL - - - - - - - - - - _- qp'l ; p►'lTol)!.;tzti PP eC. Miami i;ten t1 (ExJ. .t. E . Cj pj L i Yno- I'• i r;�,x ...!•;,t : r� 1 '.'�.� , gt7U �at:,� j x S _ ii sYro" P lazz.a 11 lU 1 ------------- TC►TAL1:1 ap i • tiro` • !nc►i4wse t'r•o:)m ori-zir,•,i co r _ ;;t"l,5I.)Q ricrNa:.•� in w�'st�:r i -Jrm xr �.� ,:►�f�, or y: 44 'i fw. Y it: 5171J Llni "! .;..'J. 11:- NJO IirJ1a - (Awtr. t tl.,wnhl �1,1': t. - a:jl.) :�•11i +arl _ f . t•lA: •,ti � 11t.f l!_t±�PIA !,','itrlv - ,'�dj ,l,)17 f- �'+ I1. DI �i,l'll)ll I�F►'j : ;F : WA;A F Nvte! - -�o R171:,ov- 14 ;:1,11) .;p,.j !f f11t 1'1 :_!.rCl 'a�1i/► :,I lm: b1A:;A; taliat in r - `;I'i t.. WA:iA ? f3,iY •�. :'r1?t) ^r+r:,� i 1 r 11 ; = j ,III �r'1 '�%"i t`I_1''.+.Ibr, - 1�,11 ae+a/,11J. x'. a,I7171J 'ap'i f few! ::1 : L+.�C'-:.'_: ,�F,Ij; ;+�►' ::r,:rl : WA:.A (Ret•11_ wi r':I;,Ut kiti.h►%rv_ - 5;p-j;'i01'i ...r: WA ;A: ------------ , 1 1,7 tz i s �k� A i' = Fftr:rr'r. SLD rr;r:a cc r r MZAM[_rtf�Nt[_R_rt+'I _ 1_-_L=:c r,-:, r r, tt; r:r Irt[? f r i-''rl_r t!t,L._I.I r ri = T 'A fir -Ft t � ttir.p_oui • 1.1inL; - "%! ,t:uttt :< rt. itl - ""a l+�rr ,,• I Im :,F': WA::;A! ► (N+.►t�,1= '�'!�IJ -'aplJ/►'rharn: WA:"'A? ' ItiNr• h,31a►_ r! t - r,IiC) -ti , r;f.+r) qaptj ( kp:-t,-u.-tron t _ = it I -;p(J :.wit . WA:'.A I L olio ( Berm_ -- 5 -'3P,J WA:..,A + t`► r::lUC - 5 -apdi ps�r-gun : WA:.A! $F < :4 . }r)rt : ptl wi th(ju t' r: i tr. hr-rrv. —i:.)U :'.;F-: WA,: A r1rArAL - mrAtir PROPOSED F'Ft++,7[:l:T — WATE [.j .,CWCr; f:L ;1 I! FcF~M(:N? 1' �;:irt��r.,�,�F,r�;,•;a_ I _ hl) ur+ i. t _. +n 2!r; = 15, FoOl`.1 ;p�i Ao t s - .''LIt� zp,.I un i t : WA:', A J !.:' _ t 1:�tyr+i �+;u : �• .':,1 �ar�•1�'+.tr+ t r.: WA:aA ) . F;Nr.:�� 1.-F•tir,•�?_� - 1�;;'I.I,;I:Ita :=�� x. 11.L1`, - '%, ;t:a') yap•] t _ - � +t��r.;� l witr+t:}ur. D:itc.r�c:n•..-r••aF+'ii ll:�l] :;F: WA:]A1 r +�• I'tr�� rat.t►•:�n.t. ,:.-I - ltau •-;:,;•, �- . ��� .'",i J = :,11, 1)I11) '��•1 _.I'h.t• t �;r: •: r•aU,i► writ=. `,�.� ��p�jj •;.�•tt t.: WAA ) i h t L�:.t?-'''r�,t.:.•,.,_ - : 1 ;I ; . I'111 ";1- +1 0. lla �I:1 , IJ1.)I) +7r+•1 _ = jr.) SF: WA:3A ) :1. To rAl_ �r• , i�l)IJ 'at: �j e 77 F'F2CIF'!►�EI) PFtr:►.TF .T - WArER; : CWE:R RE:I=tUIRVMU-N1':-, _ I L )! "U '"'SIB vjpd/ura t . WA:. -A) RE' i :1 1 1• to f.t e r j - r-.I.I . UI W) �;F X o . C) l Fit-. C.Y1 1 W 1 Ctii �11 I� 1 (L flf?rl� -ri gp,jr' IoU :IF.- WA: i",, 1C) qp"j,"Hill ''-F : WASA ) _—_—__--__w_ To.)rAL ila i , 2sn ;P.j .r _. r. sP f c � Al 2 r _ i DRAINAGE ATTACHMENTS i' :5 T {< MIAMI CENTER NO. 1 - DRI STUDY SUMMARY OF DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS MIAMI, DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA ; MAY 21, 1966 MECO MICNDRSU.M6 AMDEK SUMMARY TABLE - RESULTS OF DRAINAGE STUDY DESIGN EXISTING ORIGINAL DRI !Nine= PROJECT STORM CONDITIONS CONDITIONS COi1DZTI0ls ssssse:aaaaaaaa�a�aaaa�°aaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaaa�.: 2 YR/ EXCESS STOR. 6 MIN PROVIDED 5 YR/ EXCESS STOR. 6 MIN PROVIDED 25 YR/ EXCESS STOR. 30 MIN PROVIDED 23.4 CF ADD'T STOR. REQ'D 1 ADD'T WELL & 590.2 CF ADD'T STOR. REQ'D 3 ADD'T WELLS REQ'D 293.2 CF ADD'T STOR. REQ'D 1 ADD'T WELL & 892.0 CF ADD'T STOR._REQ'D 3 ADD'T WELLS REQ'D NOTE: DADE COUNTY STANDARD DESIGN FOR PROJECT DRAINAGE IS BASED ON 2 YEAR OR 5 YEAR DESIGN STORMS. HCWEVER THIS PROJECT IS REQUIRED, PER THE PREVIOUS DEVELOPMENT ORDER AND DRI REPORT, TO PROVIDE A DRAINAGE SYSTEM CAPABLE OF PROCESSING RUNOFF FROM THE 25 YEAR - 30 MINUTE DESIGN STORM. AS SUCH, 3 ADDITIONAL 20" DIAMETER WELLS ARE REQUIRED TO PROCESS RUNOFF FROM THE EXISTING MIAMI CENTER NO. 1 PROJECT COMBINED WITH THE PROPOSED BISCAYNE PLAZA PROJECT. r MIAMI CENTER NO. 1 - DRI STUDY DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS- EXISTING CONDITIONS MIAMI, DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA MAY 21, 1966 - MIACNIDR.M6 AMDEK COMPUTATION OF STORM WATER DISCHARGE/PROCESSING DESIGN STORM INFORMATION A*t��ttltAtRlrltl9fkfAAt1tltA*tt��t� DESIGN STORM RETURN FREQUENCY = 2 YEAR STORM DESIGN EVENT DURATION = 6 MINUTES RAINFALL INTENSITY = 5.9 INCHES PER HOUR CONTRIBUTORY AREAS/RUNOFF FACTORS MIAMI CENTER NO. 1 ------------ SITE: 5.45 ACRES @ 0.90 = 4.905 OFFICE BLDG.: 0.61 ACRES @ 0.90 = 0.549 (1/3 LARGEST FACE) HOTEL BLDG.: 0.35 ACRES @ 0.90 = 0.315 (1/3 LARGEST FACE) SUBTOTAL = 5.769• BISCAYNE PLAZA -------------- SITE: 3.01 ACRES @ 0.30 = 0.903 (UNDEVELOPED SITE) SUBTOTAL = 0.903 TOTAL = 6.672 (NORMALIZED AREA - RUNOFF ADJUSTED) PROJECT RUNOFF COMPUTATION RAINFALL RUNOFF TO BE PROCESSED RAINFALL INTENSITY = 5.9 INCHES PER HOUR i 1 ' MIAMI CENTER NO. 1 - DRI STUDY DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS - EXISTING CONDITIONS MIAMI, DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA MAY 21, 1986 - MIACNIDR.2M6 AMDEK COMPUTATION OF STORM WATER DISCHARGE/PROCESSING r DESIGN STORM INFORMATION DESIGN STORM RETURN FREQUENCY = 5 YEAR STORM . DESIGN EVENT DURATION = 6 MINUTES RAINFALL INTENSITY = 6.6 INCHES PER HOUR F CONTRIBUTORY AREAS/RUNOFF FACTORS F MIAMI CENTER NO. 1 - - - - -------------- SITE: 5.45 ACRES o 0.90 = 4.905 OFFICE BLDG.: 0.61•ACRES @ 0.90 = 0.549 (1/3 LARGEST FACE) 3 HOTEL BLDG.: 0.35 ACRES @ 0.90 = 0.315 (1/3 LARGEST FACE) r, o=xaa==-==xsx=seas SUBTOTAL = 5.769 1 BISCAYNE PLAZA SITE: 3.01 ACRES @ 0.30 = 0.903 (UNDEVELOPED SITE) SUBTOTAL = 0.903 TOTAL = 6.672 (NORMALIZED AREA - RUNOFF ADJUSTED) PROJECT RUNOFF COMPUTATION RAINFALL RUNOFF TO BE PROCESSED RAINFALL INTENSITY = 6.6 INCHES PER HOUR = 6.6"/HR X 1-HR/60-MIN X 1-FT/12-IN. -X 7.481-GAL/1-CF = 0.06858 GAL/MIN/SF RUNOFF = 6.672 AC. X 43560 SF/AC. X 0.06858 GAL/MIN/SF = 19,931.56 GAL/MIN GRAVITY WELL DISCHARGE CAPACITY (20" diameter wells) 7 WELLS EACH DISCHARGING 2,250 GAL/MIN (2.5' OF HEAD) -i..: TOTAL WELL CAPACITY = 7 X 2,250 GAL/MIN = 15,750 GAL/MIN j: 7, STORAGE VOLUME REQUIRED = RUNOFF - WELL CAPACITY = 19,931.56 - 150750 = 4,181.56 GAL/MIN X 6MIN X 1/7.481GAL/CF j = 3,353.7 CF STORAGE VOLUME PROVIDED (ROCK TRENCH) = 7,313 CF L: - �` THEREFORE EXCESS STORAGE VOLUME PROVIDED - NO OVERFLOWS TO SAY ------------------- MIAMI CENTER NO. 1 - DRI STUDY DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS.- EXISTING CONDITIONS MIAMI, DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA MAY 21, 1986 - MIACNIDR.3M6 AMDEK COMPUTATION OF STORM WATER DISCHARGE/PROCESSING DESIGN STORM INFORMATION !*R*A**A'ik1►1F1t�4'a*!!Al11l�1sltt!!A DESIGN STORM RETURN FREQUENCY = 25 YEAR STORM DESIGN EVENT DURATION = 30 MINUTES RAINFALL INTENSITY = 5.5 INCHES PER HOUR CONTRIBUTORY AREAS/RUNOFF FACTORS MIAMI CENTER NO. 1 - - - - - - - - - --------- SITE: 5.45 ACRES @ 0.90 = 4.905 OFFICE BLDG.: 0.61 ACRES @ 0.90 = 0.549 (1/3 LARGEST FACE) HOTEL BLDG.: 0.35 ACRES @ 0.90 = 0.315 (1/3 LARGEST FACE) SUBTOTAL = 5.769 BISCAYNE PLAZA ------ SITE: 3.01 ACRES @ 0.30 = 0.903 (UNDEVELOPED SITE) SUBTOTAL = 0.903 TOTAL = 6.672 (NORMALIZED AREA - RUNOFF ADJUSTED) PROJECT RUNOFF COMPUTATION RAINFALL RUNOFF TO BE PROCESSED RAINFALL INTENSITY = 5.5 INCHES PER HOUR = 5.5"/HR X 1-HR/60-MIN X 1-FT/12-IN. X 7.481-GAL/1-CF = 0.05714 GAL/MIN/SF RUNOFF = 6.672 AC. X 43560 SF/AC. X 0.05714 GAL/MIN/SF 16,606.73 GAL/MIN GRAVITY WELL DISCHARGE CAPACITY (20" diameter wells) 7 WELLS EACH DISCHARGING 2,250 GAL/MIN (2.5' OF HEAD) TOTAL WELL CAPACITY = 7 X 2,250 GAL/MIN = 15,750 GAL/MIN STORAGE VOLUME REQUIRED = RUNOFF - WELL CAPACITY = 16,606.73 - 15,750 = 856.73 GAL/MIN X 30MIN X 1/7.481GAL/CF I MIAMI CENTER NO. 1 - DRI STUDY DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS - ORIGINAL DRI CONDITIONS MIAMI, DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA MAY 21, 1986 - MIACNIDR.4M6 AMDEK COMPUTATION OF STORM WATER DISCHARGE/PROCESSING DESIGN STORM INFORMATION DESIGN STORM RETURN FREQUENCY = 2 YEAR STORM DESIGN EVENT DURATION = 6 MINUTES ` RAINFALL INTENSITY = 5.9 INCHES PER HOUR CONTRIBUTORY AREAS/RUNOFF FACTORS !A*AtkwtA�ll�Ithtk�lRilAylt�tlRt�llAlt!'laftAlltA1M!* MIAMI CENTER NO. 1 wwwww-wwwww..w www ww SITE: •5.45 ACRES Q 0.90 = 4.905 OFFICE BLDG.: 0.61 ACRES A 0.90 = 0.549 (1/3 LARGEST FACE) HOTEL BLDG.: 0.35 ACRES a 0.90 = 0.315 (1/3 LARGEST FACE) a=xasaxsxssxaxxas= SUBTOTAL = 5.769 BISCAYNE PLAZA AREA • ------------•------ SITE: 3.01 ACRES @ 0.90 = 2.709 CONDO-1: 0.47 ACRES 9 0.90 = 0.423 (1/3 LARGEST FACE) CONDO-2: 0.47 ACRES @ 0.90 = 0.423 (1/3 LARGEST FACE) SUBTOTAL = 3.555 TOTAL = 9.324 (NORMALIZED AREA - RUNOFF ADJUSTED) PROJECT RUNOFF COMPUTATION RAINFALL RUNOFF TO BE PROCESSED RAINFALL INTENSITY x 5.9 INCHES PER HOUR = 5.9"/HR X 1-HR/60-MIN X 1-FT/12-IN. X 7.481-GAL/1-CF = 0.0613 GAL/MIN/SF RUNOFF = 9.324 AC. X 43560 SF/AC. X 0.0613 GAL/MIN/SF = 24,897.2 GAL/MIN GRAVITY WELL DISCHARGE CAPACITY (20" diameter wells) 7 WELLS EACH DISCHARGING 2,250 GAL/MIN (2.5' OF HEAD) TOTAL WELL CAPACITY = 7 X 2,250 GAL/MIN = 15,750 GAL/MIN STORAGE VOLUME REQUIRED = RUNOFF - WELL CAPACITY = 24,897.2 - 15,750 = 9,147.2 GAL/MIN X 6MIN X 1/7.481GAL/CF = 7,336.3 CF STORAGE VOLUME PROVIDED (ROCK TRENCH) = 7,313 CF THEREFORE 23.38 CF OF ADDITIONAL STORAGE VOLUME REQUIRED MIAMI CENTER NO. 1 - DRI STUDY DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS - ORIGINAL DRI CONDITIONS MIAMI, DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA MAY 21, 1986 - MIACNIDR.SM6 AMAEK COMPUTATION OF STORM WATER DISCHARGE/PROCESSING DESIGN STORM INFORMATION DESIGN STORM RETURN FREQUENCY = 5 YEAR STORM DESIGN EVENT DURATION = 6 MINUTES RAINFALL INTENSITY = 6.6 INCHES PER HOUR CONTRIBUTORY AREAS/RUNOFF FACTORS ��**,►spew*aa����+t,�����w�,��r�r�*"���� MIAMI CENTER NO. 1 ------------------ SITE: 5.45 ACRES 0 0.90 = OFFICE BLDG.: 0.61 ACRES @ 0.90 = HOTEL BLDG.: 0.35 ACRES 0.90 = 4.905 0.549 (1/3 LARGEST FACE) 0.315 (1/3 LARGEST FACE) SUBTOTAL = 5.769 BISCAYNE PLAZA AREA ------------------- SITE: 3.01 ACRES Q 0.90 = 12.709 CONDO-1: 0.47 ACRES 1 0.90 = 0.423 (1/3 LARGEST FACE) CONDO-2: 0.47 ACRES a 0.90 = 0.423 (1/3 LARGEST FACE) SUBTOTAL = 3.555 TOTAL = 9.324 (NORMALIZED AREA - RUNOFF ADJUSTED) PROJECT RUNOFF COMPUTATION RAINFALL RUNOFF TO BE PROCESSED RAINFALL INTENSITY = 6.6 INCHES PER HOUR = 6.6"/HR X 1-HR/60-MIN X 1-FT/12-IN. X- 7.481-GAL/1-CF 0.06858 GAL/MIN/SF RUNOFF = 9.324 AC. X 43560 SF/AC. X 0.06858 GAL/MIN/SF = 270854.0 GAL/MIN GRAVITY WELL DISCHARGE CAPACITY (20" diameter wells) 7 WELLS EACH DISCHARGING 2,250 GAL/MIN (2.5- OF HEAD) TOTAL WELL CAPACITY = 7 X 2,250 GAL/MIN = 15,750 GAL/MIN STORAGE VOLUME REQUIRED = RUNOFF - WELL CAPACITY = 27,854.0 - 15,750 = 12,104 GAL/MIN X 6MIN X 1/7.481GAL/CF = 9,707.8 CF STORAGE VOLUME PROVIDED (ROCK TRENCH) = 7,313 CF THEREFORE 2,394.8 CF OF ADDITIONAL STORAGE VOLUME REQUIRED - ADD 1 WELL 2,250 GAL/MIN (1,804.6 CF/6 MIN) AND 590.2 CF OF STORAGE a MIAMI CENTER NO. 1 - DRI STUDY DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS - ORIGINAL DRI CONDITIONS MIAMI, DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA MAY 21, 1986 - MIACNIDR.6M6 AMDEK COMPUTATION OF STORM WATER DISCHARGE/PROCESSING DESIGN STORM INFORMATION A*RAtY*t477'1l'4M11*1b�AtAi11Rl11tSa1ait�14 DESIGN STORM RETURN FREQUENCY = 25 YEAR STORM DESIGN EVENT DURATION = 30 MINUTES RAINFALL INTENSITY = 5.5 INCHES PER HOUR CONTRIBUTORY AREAS/RUNOFF FACTORS MIAMI CENTER NO. 1 SITE: 5.45 ACRES @ 0.90 = 4.905 OFFICE BLDG.: 0.61 ACRES @ 0.90 = 0.549 (1/3 LARGEST FACE) HOTEL BLDG.: 0.35 ACRES @ 0.90 = 0.315 (1/3 LARGEST FACE) SUBTOTAL = 5.769 BISCAYNE PLAZA AREA - - - - - - ------------- SITE: 3.01 ACRES @ 0.90 = CONDO-1: 0.47 ACRES @ 0.90 = CONDO-2: 0.47 ACRES @ 0.90 = SUBTOTAL = 2.709 0.423 (1/3 LARGEST FACE) 0.423 (1/3 LARGEST FACE) 3.555 TOTAL = 9.324 (NORMALIZED AREA - RUNOFF ADJUSTED) PROJECT RUNOFF COMPUTATION RAINFALL RUNOFF TO BE PROCESSED RAINFALL INTENSITY = 5.5 INCHES PER HOUR = 5.5"/HR X 1-HR/60-MIN X 1-FT/12-IN. X 7.481-GAL/1-CF = 0.'05715 GAL/MIN/SF RUNOFF = 9.324 AC. X 43560 SF/AC. X 0.05715 GAL/MIN/SF = 23,211.67 GAL/MIN GRAVITY WELL DISCHARGE CAPACITY (20" diameter wells) 7 WELLS EACH DISCHARGING 2,250 GAL/MIN (2.5' OF HEAD) TOTAL WELL CAPACITY = 7 X 2,250 GAL/MIN = 15,750 GAL/MIN STORAGE VOLUME REQUIRED = RUNOFF - WELL CAPACITY = 23,211.67 - 15,750 = 7,461.67 GAL/MIN X 30MIN X 1/7.4810AL/CF = 29,922.48 CT Ex^ �- �. MIAMI CENTER NO. 1 - DRI STUDY DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS - PROPOSED DRI CONDITIONS MIAMI, DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA MAY 21, 1986 - MIACNIDR.7M6 AMDEK COMPUTATION OF STORM WATER DISCHARGE/PROCESSING DESIGN STORM INFORMATION DESIGN STORM RETURN FREQUENCY = 2 YEAR STORM DESIGN EVENT DURATION = 6 MINUTES RAINFALL INTENSITY = 5.9 INCHES PER HOUR CONTRIBUTORY AREAS/RUNOFF FACTORS MIAMI CENTER NO. 1 ------------------ SITE: 5.45 ACRES @ 0.90 = 4.905 OFFICE BLDG.: 0.61 ACRES @ 0.90 = 0.549 (1/3 LARGEST FACE) HOTEL BLDG.: 0.35 ACRES @ 0.90 = 0.315 (1/3 LARGEST FACE)' SUBTOTAL = 5.769 BISCA11NE PLAZA AREA SITE: 3.01 ACRES @ 0.90 = 1 2.709 OFFICE-1: 0.61 ACRES @ 0.90 = 0.549 (1/3 LARGEST FACE) OFFICE-2: 0.47 ACRES @ 0.90 = 0.423 (1/3 LARGEST FACE) SUBTOTAL = 3.681 TOTAL = 9.45 (NORMALIZED AREA - RUNOFF ADJUSTED) PROJECT RUNOFF COMPUTATION a**w*�s�s�*****��►,t*w**�►w*� RAINFALL RUNOFF TO BE PROCESSED RAINFALL INTENSITY = 5.9 INCHES PER HOUR 5.911/HR X 1-HR/60-MIN X 1-FT/12-IN. X 7.481-GAL/1-CF = 0.0613 GAL/MIN/SF RUNOFF = 9.45 AC. X 43560 SF/AC. X 0.0613 GAL/MIN/SF = 25,233.65 GAL/MIN GRAVITY WELL DISCHARGE CAPACITY (20" diameter wells) 7 WELLS EACH DISCHARGING 2,250 GAL/MIN (2.5' OF HEAD) TOTAL WELL CAPACITY = 7 X 2,250 GAL/MIN = 15,750 GAL/MIN STORAGE VOLUME REQUIRED = RUNOFF - WELL CAPACITY = 25,233.65 - 15,750 = 9,483.65 GAL/MIN X 6MIN X 1/7.481GAL/CF = 7,606.19 CF STORAGE VOLUME PROVIDED (ROCK TRENCH) = 7,313 CF THEREFORE 293.19 CF OF ADDITIONAL STORAGE VOLUME REQUIRED i� - 1 MIAMI CENTER NO. 1 - DRI STUDY DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS - PROPOSED DRI CONDITIONS MIAMI, DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA MAY 21, 1986 - MIACNIDR.8M6 AMDEK COMPUTATION OF STORM WATER DISCHARGE/PROCESSING DESIGN STORK INFORMATION DESIGN STORM RETURN FREQUENCY = 5 YEAR STORM DESIGN EVENT DURATION = 6 MINUTES RAINFALL INTENSITY - 6.6 INCHES PER HOUR _ CONTRIBUTORY AREAS/RUNOFF FACTORS MIAMI CENTER NO. 1 -------------- SITE: 5.45 ACRES @ 0.90 = 4.905 OFFICE BLDG.: 0.61 ACRES @ 0.90 = 0.549 (1/3 LARGEST FACE) HOTEL BLDG.: 0.35 ACRES @ 0.90 = 0.315 (1/3 LARGEST FACE) saanee_oaa=s==asas SUBTOTAL = 5.769 BISCAYNE PLAZA AREA - - ----------------- SITE: 3.01 ACRES @ 0.90 = 2.709 OFFICE-1: 0.61 ACRES @ 0.90 = 0.:49 (1/3 LARGEST FACE) OFFICE-2: 0.47 ACRES @ 0.90 = 0.423 (1/3 LARGEST FACE) SUBTOTAL TOTAL = 9.45 (NORMALIZED AREA - RUNOFF ADJUSTED) PROJECT RUNOFF COMPUTATION *�►�*s*�►ss**��>twt*�*tr�►,t�t,ew RAINFALL RUNOFF TO BE PROCESSED RAINFALL INTENSITY = 6.6 INCHES PER HOUR = 6.6"/HR X 1-HR/60-MIN X 1-FT/12-IN. X 7.481-GAL/1-CF = 0.06858 GAL/MIN/SF RUNOFF a 9.45 AC. X 43560 SF/AC. X 0.06858 GAL/MIN/SF a 286230.41 GAL/MIN GRAVITY WELL DISCHARGE CAPACITY (20" diameter wells) 7 WELLS EACH DISCHARGING 2,250 GAL/MIN (2.5' OF HEAD) TOTAL WELL CAPACITY = 7 X 2,250 GAL/MIN = 15,750 GAL/MIN STORAGE VOLUME REQUIRED = RUNOFF - WELL CAPACITY = 28,230.41 - 15,750 = 12,480.41 GAL/MIN X 6MIN X 1/7.481GAL/CF = 10,009.69 CF STORAGE VOLUME PROVIDED (ROCK TRENCH) = 7,313 CF THEREFORE 2,696.69 CF OF ADDITIONAL STORAGE VOLUME REQUIRED - ADD 1 WELL @ 2,250 GAL/MIN (1,804.6 CF/6MIN) AND 892.09 CF OF STORAGE DESIGN STORM .INFORMATION DESIGN STORM RETURN FREQUENCY = 25 YEAR STORM DESIGN EVENT DURATION = 30 MINUTES RAINFALL INTENSITY = 5.5 INCHES PER HOUR CONTRIBUTORY AREAS/RUNOFF FACTORS MIAMI CENTER NO. 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SITE:•5.45 ACRES @ 0.90 = 4.905 OFFICE BLDG.: 0.61 ACRES @ 0.90 = 0.549 (1/3 LARGEST FACE) HOTEL BLDG.: 0.35 ACRES @ 0.90 = 0.315 W3 LARGEST FACE) SUBTOTAL = 5.769 BISCAYNE PLAZA AREA -----------------•- SITE: 3.01 ACRES @ 0.90 OFFICE-1: 0.61 ACRES @ 0.90 = OFFICE-2: 0.47 ACRES @ 0.90 = 2.709 0.549 (1/3 LARGEST FACE) 0.423 (1/3 LARGEST FACE) SUBTOTAL = 3.681 TOTAL = 9.45 (NORMALIZED AREA - • RUNOFF ADJUSTED) PROJECT RUNOFF COMPUTATION RAINFALL RUNOFF TO BE PROCESSED RAINFALL INTENSITY = 5.5 INCHES PER HOUR = 5.5"/HR X 1-HR/60-MIN X 1-FT/12-IN. X 7.481-GAL/1-CF = 0.05715 GAL/MIN/SF RUNOFF = 9.45 AC. X 43560 SF/AC. X 0.05715 GAL/MIN/SF = 23,525.34 GAL/MIN GRAVITY WELL DISCHARGE CAPACITY (20" diameter wells) 7 WELLS EACH DISCHARGING 2,250 GAL/MIN (2.5- OF HEAD) TOTAL WELL CAPACITY = 7 X 2,250 GAL/MIN = 15,750 GAL/MIN STORAGE VOLUME REQUIRED = RUNOFF - WELL CAPACITY = 23,525.34 - 15,750 = 7,775.34 GAL/MIN X 30MIN X 1/7.481GAL/CF = 31,180.35 CF STORAGE VOLUME PROVIDED (ROCK TRENCH) = 7,313 CF THEREFORE 23,867.35 CF OF STORAGE VOLUME REQUIRED - ADD 3 WELLS @ 2,250 GAL/MIN ( 27,068.57 CF/30 MIN) e Dames & Moor* 3S0 Wat Caminn Gmdens Boulevard Plaza b t Suite 201 Boca Ratan, Elotdiadia 33432 (305) 392-9070 June 2, 1986 City of Miami Planning Department 275 N.W. 2nd Street Miami, Florida 33128 Attention: Mr. Joseph McManus Gentlemen: We have been retained by the present owner3 of Miami Center mr.4se 1, M.-C. Holdings Partners, to consider the potential impacts of City of Miami Planning Department Now's & June.2, 1986 P9196.1 ]&of, # QQCment Response to •question 14 - amended application for development approval for Biscayne Plaza .2 Wirth & Co. Biscayne Plaza Multiuse Complex Volume & Use Breakdown for official Submission dated June 1 1985 3 Conceptual Drawings Wirth & Co. Biscayne Plaza, Multi -use complex Phases I & 2, Sheets I through 12, dated June 1, 1985 Additionally, we have reviewed our files and reports for the Miami Center Phase I and the adjoining Biscayne Plaza site. The following documents have been reviewed for this study: Ref, Dames & Moore .12gMO=2 4 Report, Foundation investigation and Consultationv Dupont Plaza, Miami, Florida, For Holywell Corporation, dated April 30, 197? Report, Installation of Production Pressure Injected Footings, Hiami-Center Project, Phase 11 Miami, Florida, For Miami Center Limited Partnership, dated May 22, 1981 Report, Consultation of Foundation Design, Miami Center Phase 11 Condominium, Miami, Florida, for Holywell Corporation, dated August 24, 1981 7, Report, Supplementary Phase 1: Sails Exploration, Miami, Florida, for Miami Center Construction Company, dated February 12, 1982 Summary of Building Settlements, Miami T lw4ft-M4 W1 ^-W4 An fmv- UnIVU011 City of Miami Planning Department June - 2 , 1986 Pam *��= >' Wirth i Company proposes to develop the Biscayne Plaza site immediately south of the existing Miami Center Phase 1 project. The Biscayne Plaza site was formerly known as Phase II of the s;. Miami Center project. Dames & Moore served as foundation engineering consultants for Miami Center Phase I and performed studies for development of Phase 11. As such, we are very familiar with the various aspects of subsurface conditions and impacts on foundation design and performance through this experience as well as our experience on numerous other nearby projects. The Biscayne Plaza development will include two principal structures of 49 and 61 levels in height, of which ten levels serve as a common podium base. Maximum plan horizontal dimensions of the towers will measure approximately 130 feet for the two octahedral shapes. Though no structural designs have been completed at this time, we estimate gross base pressures for t the towers will be in the range of 7 to 13 thousand pounds per square foot. The dead and live load delivered to the base of the tallest tower may approach 250 million pounds. overturning moments due to wind may well be the largest designed for in the Miami area and the Southeastern United States. The largest tower will exceed the height of the existing Southeast Financial Center Gs City of Miami Planning Department Jund' 2, 1956, pigs by more than 100 feet and the Edward Ball office building by 350 feet. As measured from base to base, the 61 story Phase 2 tower will be located at a horizontal distance of 90 feet from the Edward Ball building and the Phase 1 tower will be located about 150 feet south of the Pavillon Hotel. The 10 story podium structure will abut the existing Miami center Phase 1 parking structure. Subsurf c®•eonditians The subsurface conditions at the two sites are generally similar in nature and stratigraphic sequencing as follows: Strata 1: Sand From the ground surface at elevation +5 feet City of Miami Datum (0.0 feet MSL +0.26 feet CMD) to about five feet deep, a layer of sand and shell artificial fill exists. Below this to about elevation -35 feet CMD there are natural soils of sand intermixed with remnants of the Miami Limestone Formation and shell fragments. Occasionally, deposits of dark organic silt are found within the top 20 feet. Strata 2: Fort Thompson Formation Beginning at elevation -35 feet M. and extending 60 feet to about elevation -95 feet is a tan fossiliferous limestone known ai.44tiS1nTinL } ---""` �_•--.r ._. ..�_ —. ram.. ...._.� City of Miami Planning Department June 2, 1966 M as the Fort Thompson Formation. The limestone within this formation has been subjected to solutioning by ground water and as a result is a porous permeable rock. openings in the Fort Thompson are generally filled with sand. Due to the fact that the limestone is below the ground water table, and the ground water of the area is saline, further solutioning is not taking place at the present time. As a result of solutioning, the Fort Thompson Formation is quite heterogeneous. Sand filled zones are typically infilled with loose• to medium dense sand, while the limestone itself has unconfined compressive strengths which range from 10 tons per square foot to 150 tons per square foot. The. zone from elevation -65 (CMD) to elevation -90 (CMD) contains numerous sandy zones and is compressible under the sigh load k: ,z intensities imposed by tall structures.` The subsurface conditions vary across the site from east to west in that the upper portion of the Fort Thompson Formation is highly solutioned, weakly cemented and is for the most part absent of intact limestone along the eastern portion of the site. '- Additionally, the lower formations exist at greater depth to the k •4 mast than along the west.? Ground Water The upper portion of the Fort Thompson Formation, and the r surf icial sands together form the highly permeable Biscayne; ;sy s`. City of Miami Planning Department June• 3, 1986 page Aquifer. The ground water in this water table aquifer is essentially seawater. From our initial foundation investigation and subsequent • measurements, the average ground water elevation at the Miami Center site was found to be 0.7 foot MSL (+1.0 foot City of Miami datum). Under normal barometric conditions, these levels will vary about one to two feet due to the diurnal tidal cycle. The proposed construction of the Biscayne Plaza Project will impact the existing Miami Center Phase 1 structures through a variety of mechanisms. Gross base pressures for the two towers will be some of the largest in downtown Miami. The effect on existing Miami Center Phase 1 structures will be largely dependent on both the type and method of foundation installation. As such, we have evaluated the various factors that •will influence the impacts on existing structures as follows: 1. Areal Settlement Z. Vibrations 3. Excavations 4. Dewatering S. •Noise 1. Areal Settlement - As previously discussed, settlement of the proposed towers will be largely dependent on the depth at which foundations are terminated. For instance, if supported on a shallow mat foundation within the upper 13 feet of the profile without the benefit of improvement techniques, average total settlement of the 69 story tower may exceed 18 inches. Due to its proximity to the existing City of Miami Planning Department June-2, 1.986 Pam Edward Ball tower areal settlement may vary from the abutting podium to the building in the range of 15 to 3 inches causing extensive settlement related distress and failure of many structural elements. However, if foundations are terminated at greater depth, the magnitude and influence of areal settlement will be reduced accordingly. The actual settlement must be determined by considering all of the design parameters which are not as of yet }mown. Therefore, we can only make approximate estimates of anticipated settlement performance. We have completed a cursory analysis and evaluation of the potential settlement at the base of the proposed 61 story tower and its influence by way of areal settlement on the existing Miami Center Phase 1 podium and office tower as follows: Range of Range of Total Areal Settlement Foundation Settlement at Influence at Bottom Biscayne Plaza Miami Center Elevation (CMD) Tower (inches) Phase=(inches)_ . -10 feet 18 to 24 15 to 3 -35 feet 13 to 15 10 to 2 -65 feet 10 to 12 8 to 1 -95 feet 2 to 3 2 to 1 -125 feet 1 to 2 Small The above estimates assume no pre -construction improvement techniques below the foundation bottom elevations. Though considered a valid analysis for the purposes of this report, these evaluations have been performed with a broad range of assumptions without the benefit of firm structural loading details and as a result, the above estimates may be more or less than those which will be observed. However, the orders of magnitude reported herein are considered valid for these discussions. The comparative estimates of settlement will be similar for the influence of the 49 story Biscayne Plaza tower on the Miami Center structures though the overall magnitudes of settlement will be somewhat less than those described above. It is again _ important to note that this analysis is not intended as a recommended solution to mitigation of excessive settlement but is m rely intended as a simplified means of considering potential impacts of the Biscayne Plaza Project on the existing .Miami Center structures. Actual settlement and City of Miami planning Department June . 2 , 1,986 Pam methods of reducing its magnitude can only be accomplished in concert with complete and comprehansive angineering designs. 2. Vibrations - Excessive vibrations from foundation installation may cause distress to the existing structures. Vibrations will cause structural stresses above ground as well as further consolidation of subsoils beneath the existing foundations. The most likely cause and that with the highest potential for vibrations is pile driving. Though dependent on many factors, vibrations induced through pile driving may cause excessive settlement and structural distress at the existing buildings. By any means, peak particle velocities should be limited to less than 0.05 inches per second within any of the existing Miami Center Phase 1 areas. 3. Excavations e any excavations required for the proposed project will need to .consider the potential effects on existing foundations.. Braced excavations and/or shoat piling cutoff walls will be required along the common column line of the two podium structures in order to prevent undermining of any, portion of the existing foundations. 4. Dewaterinv - Any dewatering required for the proposed Project will need to consider the potential effects on existing foundations. Lowering of the water table at the existing structures will cause increased effective stresses and settlement from beneath the foundation level. Additionally, dewatering may cause transport of fines from around and beneath foundations resulting in loosening of subsoils and subsequent loss of support. Dowatering 1 systems will need to be designed with appropriate measures. l to prevent excessive increases in effective stresses and doss of ground support by way of vertical cutoff walls below ground and recharge systems to mitigate potential adverse impacts on existing foundations. S. Noise - Excessive noise may become bothersome to the extent that. tenants of the existing buildings would consider it a hindrance to conduct of their business. Diesel impact hammers will induce noise levels on the order of 110 decibels. Foundation construction limitations should consider limiting noise levels in order to prevent any adverse effects on the occupants of the existing buildings. City of Miami Planning Department June 2, 1986 �O qw- WWWOUW.W lag TO. The above discussions address those factors which we consider primary causes of potential adverse effects on existing foundations, however, others may exist. Mitigation of adverse effects can only be accomplished through engineering designs and construction methods which consider these potential impacts. we provide these discussions as concerns which should be raised and addressed as part of any amendments to the development order. It is hoped this report is clear and understandable. event you have any questions, please call us. In the _ k .P 7,�'� MIAMI CENTER I/BISCAYNE PLAZA , PROPOSED SUBSTANTIVE AMENDMENTS TO DEVELOPMENT ORDER (EXHIBIT "B")--�:�'`—' °. 16b. (Present Condition 16 becomes 16a]. 11 ®nitted to construct parking facilitie ob - t 2200 parkin a; provided, how that if Applicant { constructs more than 800 spaces, such excess shall be furnished for use of the owner erg of Miami Center $ nq in accordance with that certain Gran of ent and Declaration of Restrictions recorded in OfficialRecords Book 11102 at page 2247 of the Public 1 Y: Records of Dade County, Florida the owner(s) of Miami q with unrestricted a. i6f. (New) Nothing in this Development Order, or in any development permits issued pursuant hereto, shall limit, modify or restrict in any way the rights of the owners of Miami Center Existing in and to an easement for parking purposes to be located on Biscayne Plaza propert pursuant to the terms of the Grant of Easements 41 x r: ? Y s,e :. .. i . r 17b. stitute) Within sixty (60) days of the data of i ee of the Development Order and prior to the issu of any building permits for enclosed area parkin Phase I of Biscayne Plaza, the Applic shall, �r - . using as tion and generation rates acceptab o the <` county, d S M C staff, prepare and s t a - detailed traf analysis documenting the posed , Biscayne Plaza ect's impacts on the approved plan for the Downtown ributor Bifurcat amp System. Such analysis shall also dude a reco ed set of Improvements to the Do own Dist for Bifurcated Ramp ; System and to the adjoin su a street system, permitting the Downtown Di for Bifurcated Ramp System S and the adjoining surface system to operate at acceptable levels of se du q the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. The Applicant 1 fund onstruct 300% of such recommended additio mprcvements. Sr 17c. (Substitute) Pr to the issuance of an ilding permit for -enclosed s or parking in Prase I of scayne Plaza, in ant that construction of the town Distribu ifurcated Ramp System has not be the applic all fund or construct 100 percent of inter roadway improvements identified as A(1), A(3 A(3: A(4) in Attachment 5 (or suitable replaceme.:, lly agreed upon by M=, Dade County Public Works _ *Z� Dep nt ("County"), the City of Miami Departmen. t Publi, rks, Applicant and SFRPC) pursuant to 1380006 (e)2, Florida Statutes. A 17f. (Substitute) for to the issuance of any ding permit for enclosed a or parking in Phase I Biscayne Plaza, the Appli t shall fund, bond ,provide a letter r of credit for $S1 (198S dollars o FDOT, as the development's fair a contribu to the $9,763,000 - (198S Dollars) Brickel enue er Bridge replacement, pursuant to 1380.06(1S)( rida Statutes. t'[ 279. (Substitute) Prior to the ce of any.building permit for enclosed areas or ing hase II of Biscayne Plaza, the Applicant all fund, or provide a letter ` of credit for $S,0 000 (198S dol ) to FDOT, as the b development's f share contributio the Downtown Distributor Bi cated Ramp System (to oat estimated` at $56 milli in 198S dollars) pursuant b $380.06(1S )2, Florida Statutes. In the t the !�4 y,c currentl approved plan for the Downtown Dis for Sifurc adRamp System is modified, the devel® ' fair aha contribution will be adjusted accordingly.; 17h. w) Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occup - for Phase I of Biscayne Plaza in the event that construction of the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp .S. ry; Ak i has not begun, the Applicant shall, using as ons and generation rates acceptable to County, V= SFRPC staff, prepare and submit appr iat* data and doc tation affirmatively demonstrati o the ;r satisfacti of the City of Miami Public s and Planning Dep onto, MM, County and C staff acceptable into improvements (in a tion to those s interim improveme described in C tion 17b above) to allow roadways to o to at love of service acceptable } to the City and Count the A and P.M. peak hours pending the completion ® 1 traffic improvements. The data and documentation she loo include projections acceptable to the City, , unty and SFRPC r • establishing when impl tati f interim solutions shall be required in a or in Such projections shall be reviewed lly after be ing of occupancy and, when appropr modified by th ty, FDOT, County and SFRPC. App t (and not Miami Ce Existing) shall pay its r share contribution to cost of implementin acceptable interim improv s. Prior to the -is a of a certificate of occupancy Phase I of size Plaza, Applicant shall estimate in a r aces le to the City or the County, such equitab are hd that amount with the City or the County. F issuance of a certificate of occupancy for Phas. of Biscayne Plaza, the Applicant shall obtain a commi +M OF WIL i on thb 4art of the City and the County to implement th! aeea le interim improvements by the time indicated` the p tions. Copies of documents, data and commitme shall be sent to SF'RPC and incorpora into ' the Amends lication for Development Approv l71. (New) Prior to issuance of a certific of occupancy ,. for Phase I of Bi a Plaza, the Appl t will fund the :1 following improveme to Biscayne eo and along the _ site which are necessa to acco a Biscayne Plaza traffic: construction o ive t is lanes on Biscayne y Boulevard from Biscayne Bo iiay to S.B. 2n4 Street; dedication of any of its pr y fronting on Biscayne Boulevard necessary for f lanings; and addition of a third left turn lane un m Biscayne Boulevard r44 onto S.E. 2r►d Street. approved i rim improvements described in Condi 17h obviate th eed for any of r these improvamen such improvement(s)11 not be _ required. d.' 17j. (New) Pri the issuance of any building 't for x` enclo teas or parking in Phase II of Bisca ssa, the icant shall fund, bond or provide a lette ct to t•M for 100 percent of the costs of roadrr a tications, mutually agreed upon by L'M the City' { {„ ! L _ 4 :,.w:.3:..::r✓� C _ :i�.WK-�ad.��.`i. 3��_ % _ � �M s— .."„LAY implem ing the acceptable interim improvements. or to the once of any building permit for Phase f Biscayne a, Applicant shall estimate in a or acceptable ®City or the County, such a able share and bond that t with the City or the ty. Prior to the issuance building permit for ase II of Biscayne Plaza, th licant shall o in a commitment on the part of the City, the County implement the acceptable interim impr eats • time indicated by — the projections. Copies ents, data and commitments shall be sent and incorporated into the Application for Dave an royal. x r •. 171. Prior to.the issuan f a certific of occupancy for Phase I of Bisca lata, in the eve that construction has commenced • Downtown Distributo ifurcated Ramp System, the icant shall pay its fair a contribut for Phase I traffic impacts on Downtown Distri r Bifurcated Ramp System. Such fair re coat tion shall be credited towards the fair Is t established in Condition 17q. ,x , .777 25b. (8 titifte) Withhold issuance of any building permits f Pha of Biscayne Plaza until Applicant satisfies th roqui ants of Condition 17b. The absence of MOT approva a required by Condition 17b, shall cre a reasonabl kelihood of additional regional i ct, causing the v®lopment to be subject to fur r y:y F x development- egional-impact review pur t to '- 1380.06(19)(a), orida Statutes (1985) 2Sc. (Substitute) Pursu to 1780.06(1 e)(2), Florida '{ Statutes (1985), vi d issu of any building permits for Phase I of Biscayn aza til all interim road improvements identified achment 5 are constructed as w:3 required by Condition 17 ;f4 . M. (Substitute) Withho issuanc any building permits for zq, S Phase I of Bisca Plaza until Applicant funds, bonds` or provides a ter of credit fo 17,000 (1985 dollars)' _ pursuant to Lion 17f. 259. (Subst e) Withhold issuance of any ding permits for Phi► of Biscayne Plaza until the App t funds,. or provides a letter of credit for $ 7,000 (1985 Lars) pursuant to Condition 179. yAOIUI � A erra • 25h. (Substitute) If construction has not commenced an the Downto istributor Bifurcated Ramp System, withhold i*tr1but 'IMOLa 40 "r issuance any certificates of occupancy for the Bi 18 is Plaza Phan ortion of the project until Applic as L satisfied Virements of Condition 17h. 251. (Now) Withhold i ce of any building is for Phase 1 of Biscayne Plaza til the Applican tisfies the requirematits of Condi n 171. 15J. (Now) Withhold issuance o ilding permits for Phase It of Biscayne Plaza untilApplicant satisfies the requirements of Conditio j. A .25*,* (New) If construct has not bees mpleted on the Downtown Distri r Bifurcated Ramp stem, withhold any, building pe for Phase 11 of Bisca Plaza until the A Applicant sfios the requirements of ition 17k. U 2SI. (N old issuance of a certificate of pans for 11 of Biscayne Plaza until construction omplbted the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp Syst .4 ia 25m. "47 d ias�PI of B the Downtown Distr Applic i JI System and r. on Lon In Attachment 5, paragraph A3, line 6 - after "warranted" insert: (provided, however, that such signalization does not ( preclude the approved signalization of the Edward Ball Office F Building parking garage exit, and such signalization for the y Biscayne Plaza exit shall be coordinated with the signalization for the Edward Ball Office Building). S ,F fi> Insert the following language into the "Safety and Security" r. section of the Development Order: j f; Applicant shall, at its own expense, provide all necessary measures in order to prevent or mitigate any adverse effects of the.proposed construction of Biscayne Plaza on the foundations �. and structures of Miami Center Existing,, in accordance with all applicable codes, standards, and sound engineering and . Y. _ ... construction practices. IF s construction practices. Insert the following language at the end of the Development Order: Nothing set forth in this Development Order shall limit, modify or restrict in any way any of the rights of the owners of Miami Center Existing, whether at law or in equity, including but not limited to the right to protect (a) the structural integrity of = all improvements located on Miami Center Existing property; (b) the foundation support for such improvements; and (c) the . ,r integrity and function of the water supply, sewage disposal, gravity runoff disposal and/or stormwater drainage -systems of Miami Center Existing. 6135E 6/3/86 6PH -11- Mr. Eladio Armesto-Garcia offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption. , RESOLUTION PAB 20-86 RESOLUTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL, AS AMENDED, TO THE CITY COMMISSION OF ISSUANCE OF AN AMENDED DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR THE ONE DUPONT PLAZA (F/K/A BISCAYNE PLAZA) PORTION OF THE MIAMI CENTER I PROJECT, A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT, (RESOLUTION 79-396; MAY 24, 1979. AS AMENDED) LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 301-399 SOUTH BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, ALSO DESCRIBED AS ALL OF TRACT D, BLOCK 1, DUPONT PLAZA (50-11) P.R.D.C., LESS THE FOLLOWING: BEGIN AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT D AND RUN WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT D FOR 645.94 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG A CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 61 DEGREES, 26 MINUTES, 00 SECONDS FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 26.81 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG A CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 300.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28 DEGREES 34 MINUTES 00 SECONDS FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 149.57 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTH FOR 293.50 FEET (SAID LAST MENTIONED FOUR COURSES BEING COINCIDENT WITH THE BOUNDARY LINES OF SAID TRACT D); THENCE EAST FOR 179.41 FEET; THENCE NORTH FOR 150.00 FEET; THENCE EAST FOR 525.36 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 07 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT D FOR 300.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, LYING AND BEING IN THE CITY OF MIAMI, DADE COUNTY, PERTAINING TO CONDITION 1 OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER (EXHIBIT A FOR THE ONE DUPONT PLAZA PROJECT ATTACHED) WHICH PROPOSED AMENDMENTS DELETE TWO TOWERS COMPRISING 500 DWELLING UNITS OF 865,700 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING AREA AND 20 PARKING SPACES AND SUBSTITUTE TWO TOWERS COMPRISING 19480,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS OFFICE AREA; 220,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL BUILDING AREA AND 300t000 SQUARE FEET OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDING AREA COMPRISING 150 DWELLING UNITS; INCORPORATING AMENDMENTS TO EXHIBIT B ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF BY REFERENCE; AND FURTHER MAKING THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS OF FACT: A) THE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD HEREBY DETERMINES THAT THE PROJECT IS IN CONFORMITY WITH THE ADOPTED MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN; B) THE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD HEREBY DETERMINES THAT THE PROJECT IS IN ACCORD WITH THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATIONS OF ZONING ORDINANCE 9500; C) THE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD HEREBY FINDS THAT THE PROJECT WOULD NOT HAVE AN ADVERSE IMPACT ON SOILS, ANIMAL LIFE, OR VEGETATION AND FURTHER FINDS THAT IT WOULD HAVE A NUMBER OF POSITIVE IMPACTS INCLUDING: 1) UP TO 29500 PERMANENT NEW JOBS WOULD BE GENERATED BY THE PROJECT, AND AS A RESULT, NEARLY 2,90O ADDITIONAL FULL- TIME JOBS COULD BE CREATED IN SOUTH PLORIDA, WITH A $108 MILLION INCREASE IN TOTAL WAGES AND $184 MILLION IN VALUE ADDED TO THE REGIONAL ECONOMY; 2) A NET POSITIVE FISCAL IMPACT OF $8.1 MILLION WOULD BE CREATED BY THE PROJECT; 3) A REDUCTION IN THE GROWTH OF REGIONAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION WOULD RESULT FROM THE ENERGY EFFICIENT CONSERVATION MEASURES PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT FOR THE PROJECT; D) THE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD HEREBY FINDS THAT THE PRGJECT WOULD HAVE A NUMBER OF ADVERSE IMPACTS WHICH RESULT FROM THE NORMAL COURSE OF DEVELOPMENV OR CAN BE POTENTIALLY MITIGATED�BY THE APPLICANT THROUGH THE CONDITIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER, AS FOLLOWS: 1) INCREASE IN ANNUAL ENERGY USE WITHIN THE REGION BY THE EQUIVALENT OF NEARLY 6.7 MILLION GALLONS OF FUEL OIL; 2) INCREASE IN AMOUNT AND NUMBER OF HAZARDOUS WASTES GENERATED ON -SITE; 3) WOULD PLACE ADDITIONAL UNFUNDED DEMANDS UPON POLICE, EMERGENCY RESCUE AND FIRE SERVICES; 4) WOULD GENERATE 2,464 AM AND 2,250 PM PEAK -HOUR VEHICLE TRIPS (MIAMI CENTER EXISTING AND PROPOSED) ON THE REGIONAL ROADWAY NETWORK AND, ALONG WITH OTHER DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC, REDUCE LEVELS OF • iG►Faaa4 aa� /11 V/1s avVaJ —v W T a A Exhibit "A" Attache to ands made a part of d Cii1 I. !• - •5/17/79 79-396 RESOLUTION NO. ` A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI COn.1ISSION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF A DEVELOPMENT ORDER,• APPROVING WITH MODIFICATIONS, THE BALL POINT PROJECT, A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT. PROPOSED BY. HOLYWELL CORPORATION', FOR TRACT D. DUPONT PLAZA (50-11), LOCATED ON THE NORTH BANK ANND AT THE 14OUTH OF THE MIA.M1 RIVER, AFTER CON- DUCTING A PUBLIC HEARING AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 380.06, FLORIDA STATUTES, AND CONSIDERING THE • REPORT AND RECOT.-XNDATIONS OF THE SOUTH FLORIDA = REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL AND THE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHED HERETO AS E) MIBIT "A"; THE RECOarIENDATIONS OF THE SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "B"; AND THE APPLICA- TION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE; FINDING THAT THE DEVELOPER'S PROPOSED CHANGES FROM THAT APPROVED BY THE SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COTNCIL INVOLVE NO SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION; FURTHER DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO SEND THE RESOLUTION TO AFFECTED AGENCIES AND THE DEVELOPER. WHEREAS, The Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting • held on May 16, 1979, Item 01, following an advertised hearing. adopted Resolution No. PAB-23-79 by a 7 to 0 vote (1 member absent), recommending approval of the Development Order for the Ball Point Project, a Development of Regional Impact, as hereinafter act forth; and FINDINGS OF FACT WHEREAS, Holywell Corporation has proposed the undertaking of the Ball Point Project, a Development of Regional Impact, as defined by Chapter 22F-2. Rules of the State of Florida Department of Administration, located within the City of Miami, on a tract of 8.46 acres, at' the North bank and at the mouth of the -Miami River, comprised of 805,400 square feet of gross office space; 630 hotel units in a structure containing 658,400 square feet of gross hotel space; 500 dwelling units; 85,000 square feet of gross space for retail use; and 2,365 parking spaces; and x Cliff COUMOMON MEETING OF �I: WAWA* i _ r�.r r.••� n..�...•.• •.. n••.w.+w •wow+ .�...a.•. ... • ..•.� . w �•i . • • � ... • .. •ter`. sS WHEREAS, Holywell Corporation has submitted a complete - Application for Development Approval for a Development of Regional i, ' Impact to the South Florida Regional Planning Councir pursuant to ` Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes, and did receive a favorable recommendation for a proposed development order on May T. 1979, •as set forth in the -Report and Recommendations of the South Florida IL -e Rlegional • Planning Council attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and made a part hereof; 'and WHEREAS, the Application for Development Approval, as.reviewed by the.South Florida Regional Planning Council, referred to an office f" C'. building with 928,200 square feet or p 8 Q gross office space; a hotel k structure with 550,000 gross square feet, and a parking structure >` with 2,560 parking spaces, which does not amount to outstanding t__. . change from what is now proposed; and WHEREAS, Holywell Corporation has complied with all the requirements set forth in Ordinance No. 8290;•and WHEREAS, the City Commission has considered the Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council and each element required to be considered by Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes; and CONCLUSIONS OF LAW WHEREAS, the Ball Point Project, proposed by the Holywell Corporation complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies with local and development regulations, being Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 6871; and WHEREAS, the proposed development does not unreasonable inter - fare with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State ' G Land Development Platt applicable to the City of Miami;- and WHEREAS, the proposed development is consistent with the Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council 4: and does not unreasonably interfere with any of the considerations and objectives set forth in Chapter 330, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS. the Mia''O% Zoning Board, on 11Ay 2Z', 79, granted a variance from tite 300 foot height lin.'it and granted Conditional. Use approval for parking uses as allowed in Ordinance No. 6871. the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance for the City of Miami; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has determined that all require- ments of publication and other legal requirements for the issuance of the proposed Development Order have been complied with; and WHEREAS. the City Commission deems it advisable and in the best interests of the.general welfare of the City R Miami to 'issue a Development Order £or the Development of Regional Impact, as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED . BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. A Development Order, attached hereto as Exhibit "A". approving with modifications. the Ball Point Project, a Development of Regional Impact, proposed by Holywell Corporation for Tract D. DUPONT PLAZA (50-11). located on the North bank and at the mouth of the Miami River, be and the same is hereby granted and issued. Section 2. The Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council dated May 7, 1979, is attached as Exhibit "B", and made a part of this Development Order. Section 3. The Application for Development Approval is Incorporated herein by reference and relied upon by the parties in discharging their statutory duties under Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes. Substantial compliance with the representations contained , in the Application for Development Approval is a condition for approval unless waived or modified by agreement among the parties. Section 4. Pursuant to Section 380.06 (2), Florida Statutes, •the City of Miami has reviewed the proposed changes to the Applica- • tion for Development Approval from that approved by the South Florida Regional Planning Council. and finds no substantial deviation there- from. ' Section 5. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to send certified copies of this Resolution immediately to the Florida Division of State Planning, Department of Administration, Room 530, Carlton Building, Tallahassee. Florida 32304; to the South Florida Regional Planning Council, 1515 N.W. 167th Street, Suite 429, Miami, Florida; and to Holywell Corporation, 2 DuPont Circle, Suite 100, Washington, D. C. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24 day of May 1979. MAURICE A FERRE • MAURICE A. FEIM;' WA OR R .. ..•w..4• .. . .. .. •r . • ...♦i:;�..:�.yRaa'::e.;.w...c-1.�.'.w:.,+®e,... .t•ae.a:..: .s.�•... . ..�. :�",���;.i�aL ►i.: �w:..wi.r•.��a.w•�M ...1 ww.;.7�w.w �aiw•�:a;p:w.`.•�..R:r.:+ ie�•�::+.4t°: ..::3® lt�,::.:. :,i.�5„„y�:4:::i�w .. .. ...•. ,,:+ .�. .w�w+..r1'Try•w.1w!+w.RvfF!..+r�..r�:MMAY•►eV'wive++it�}tiwr':e•.•t.r'�+n.+w^NR'sA't.�Rr:ne>r*s+s+swa�^-.a....+..... AM V. .. •. ems.•_; : w.i,e.. 3� ..:./•+�.rs....w yr. .,.•:.• diR:R•'.r. •Y7.r.•rw.• s+•w!w.••.Ywc.�rR•Y.>,9sr'.�'.}.w'>t.:�Ar.ff�A7ti V E MISIT A , f - Lot it be known that pursuant to Chapter 380.0 Florida Statutes the Com4asion of the City of Miami Florida has considered in.public hearing held on May 24, 1979 the issuance of Development order for Ball Point, a Development of Regional Impact to be located in the City of Miami. Pursuant.to Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes and after due consideration of the consistency of this proposed development with regulations, and the Report and eo Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council, thi ComisiBion took the following action: Approval of this development with the hollowing modifications. �' :•' r wa Development !.... . f.a r". is 1. The development is limited to a project containing not sore than: 805,400 square feet of gross office spaces 630 hotel units in a structure +sntp . taininq 658,400 square feet of gross hotel space: SOO dwelling ustitsr 85,000 square feet of gross retail use and 2,365 parking spaces. The project as proposed would comprise an average Floor Area Ratio of 6.36 fax the 8.46 acre site, approval having been previously granted for a variance frois the 300-toot height limit and conditional use approval for Parking usses. Further, the lot coverage is as•the ground usable open space is 17 it the enclosed pedestrian open space at usin floor level is as specified by the Applicant in the Application,, for Development Approval and the preliminary design docents of March:23., 2,9.790 as axhended by Supplement dated May 21 , 1979. ..1. ;m -�-•;�..-�•�.'. a•.�'r+.•ae•-•.sue-,• _ .� � ! ... .. . b"e�.yer.-�.*.s•�'t'--*-- - .far+: �A .. .w �� .��' `. .�. 1. ..r;•.• ...�. ... 1. i�".K': �- - w .... �: •\7•R �.•.N•.w•trM.Xe�.7y�+�EyfT�'•'43wR•+•'�.s'Tfswn4r s..,w.•:• .qw�.... . ''�'} s.s«..��.�. _. w. :.�_ - ... .K. .. -•. .fl'�•!'!-)'.�i7ni :i ►«lam►. .GT��•r{L,(IKp-,..}"�i:RN.o. f M.flales!w/llb�•.Jy.M•/fopAyi.ir�(w�'.!.�.w` .. ._ .. .. ..... «..�.. .. '...'.•�'�.'A�••: � «• ... �v w��.. �..•iy.i. 2, The applicant is encouraged to address the following concerns about the proposed developments + 3 a. Activities should be incorporated along the River Walk in order -to provide meaningful'and continuous pedestrian experiences and 'L attractions. b. Attention should be given to the treatment of the Biscayne_ Boulevard facade to ameliorate the apparent bulk of the structure. c. Attention should be given within the project to providing• views of the Masi River and Biscayne Bay as, for example, by interior �4 r design of the main floor level. d. Attention should be given to shads and landscaping at the podium level. `z These concerns, as shown in construction documents, are subject to planning Department approval prior to the issuance of a building permit for parkiaq,and Yr any enclosed areas. permits for such matters as foundations, seawall renovatLo and site preparation will be issued, however, upon proper applications therefore, , r before such approval is required. 5 3. The applicant will dedicate a pedestrian easement of not less than 20 feet ' to the City of Miami in perpetuity for Miami River walk and Dayfront Walk purposes, &M will construct the walk and provide furniture and landscaping deemed necessary by the City of Miami. The applicant will design the esse—'> cent.area and adjacent private space to allow views and access frame the project establishments, while fostering appropriate public use of the,ws'lkwar., Aespottsibility for perpetual mAntenance of all sections of the walk by th*. Applicant will be specified in the *aseswnt document. final landscape, Plae are subJeet to the approval of the Planning and Public Works a tat #via to the issuance of a permit for the Maori River stalk a" tayfxont, Walk. .... ... ..wNM...+w r•�•. ... ... r.- ... :.o •..,P�.�w r...•..•..�.^'Mvr\.•a.-wnre�.r.��e.r...... ,..+S �.Me►•..Y+ ...«•r...wr.wwr�.. �,,—rr •r �.. ,.erc�n•+sa� esw�+•�w.71+.��i..�i�MSA:4'^r.� S Ste; .;C.11. •.Tr... :. .:.»..: �:T�r t�`:i�AV `t1�v.�•`f 1'l.K." - 4.. �.r.� ..�f ��. w.: a:, • . , � - � �.... � !.. rMw-�•�•.-i �i• : .,.: fir.' �,y:,.....'.: '.rr: C Permits for such matters as foundations, seawall renovation and site preparatic will be issued, however, upon proper applications therefor , before such approval is required. 4. The AppUcant*shall provide landscape treatment for the easterly and of . Chopin Plaza as a memo of connecting the Bayfront Walk with Bayfront Park, at least comparable to the dimensions of the Bayfront Walk,with maintenance by the Applicant. Final landscape plans are subject to the approval of the Planning Department and Parks Department. S. Subject to.obtaininq all necessary permits and approvals, in the event that a Downtown People Hoover station is located at, or in the vicinity of, Biscayne Boulevard between SE and and 3rd Avenues, then the Applicant shall provide an upper level pedestrian connection to the station. 6. In the event that the developer is successful in acquiring ownership of at least three of the four blocks in adjacent DuPont Plaza, than the Applicant shall consider the provision of an upper level pedestrian connection from this project to the Applicant's future development in DuPont Plaza. Traffic Access and Parking 7. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, for parking and enclosed areas. (permits for such matters is foundation,.seaovall xenavation and site preparat4 will be issued, however, upon proper applications therefor, before such appren is requirad) , the Applicant .small, using assumptions, and geuor&t4on rates aeg able to the Dade County Department of Traffic and TraAspartation ('0ty"I OMI South Florida Regional Planning Council (*Council"), prepare and submit appro priate data and doccuzentation affirmatively dwianstrating to the satisfaction of the City of Miami. Public works anal Manning Departments raty") wad the County acceptable Lnt.arrLu UVroveawnts to allow x^raaetways to Wesate at Of service acceptable to the City and the County in the A.K. am V.K. po*.* pending the couplation of final tcrtffic improvaiumts. S - •' r"'r••'•...,i : r.,.,., �. :�.la �. �,.•. tr. -. y - ..u!'!w';^.^.n^T�,�"-R7n •.r+s+•+Ce-w...f • w.ea`•..ai...:rw.ww•�ws..ra.:...•.•+�••+.s•�••• .+..w��...s....:.wly :+.:i...1:'! •: �. ._ .. ...ww.!�++.W"ef•M.1w'1!•!f4•Mi/� M�►1^I'.Yld�i'�d'fMcV: �W'•r+:h � w++.�rsYi iy�w.... ., r.• . data and documentation shall also'include projections acceptable to the City, the Council and the County establishing when implemen- Cation of interim solutions shall be required in whole or in part. Such projections shall be reviewed annually alter beginning of occupancy and, when appropriate, modified by the City, the Council and the County. The Applicant shall pay its equitable share of the cost of implementing the acceptable interim improvements. prior to t- the issuance of a building permit for parking and enclosed areas (permits for such matters as foundation, seawall renovation and site preparation will be issued, however, upon proper applications therefor before such approval is required), the Applicant shall estimate in a manner acceptable to the City or r` .. •'�•.••y w t. ••i• •��_ ..fir .. �•�. . •.M. O♦♦12!r•�..•f•�. .M..."r �^Y � �+�ww•• .... «r .. •r. iC�ti.R'u.T.t:.A.'7Z21 • r.1�•f,,.�asd.p�.,�Mr�.M�Ty.r�1..r•wr.. .+.r.r•.rM • - ' .r..•. ~.a.., :Rlr°; try~,• hS,,«:��4=i:..• :w p..••F�{.:T.•' . •• the County, such equitable share and bond that amount pith the City or the County. Prior to the issuange of •a building permit•for parking and enclosed areas (permits = for such matters as foundations, seawall renovation and site preparation will be issued, however,.upon proper applications, therefor before such approval is required), the Applicant shall obtain a -commitment on the part of the City and the County to Implement the acceptable interim improvements by the time indicated by the projections. Copies of documents, data and commitments chall be sent to the Coundl and incorporated Into the Application for Development Approval. 8. The Applicant will fund the following improvements to Biscayne Boulevard along the site which are necessary to accommodate Ball Point traffic: provision of four traffic lanes on Biscayne Boulevard from the southernmost site access point to SE 2nd- Street and will dedicate any property necessary for such improvements: removal of the island near SE 3rd Street, provision of a traffic signal at SE 3rd Street, and addi- tion of a second left turn lane northbound onto SE 2nd Street. If approved interim improvements, under 7 above, obviate the need for any of these improvements, such improvemcnts(s) shall not be required. 9. The Applicant will reserve the land located vest and south of the eastern right•ofway, r of Biscayne Boulevard extended, and will dedicate that land to the appropriate govern-, sent agency if the land is required for construction of a Miami River crossing or, In the event that such construction does not proceed, will dedicate that land to the s, City of Miami for a public purpose. { 10. The Applicant will•nagotiate an agreement with the City of Miami, providing for two traffic lanes on Chapin Plaza unobstructed b p y parking movements for adequate access to the hotel, with the balance of right-of-way on Chopin Plaza devoted to parking, a Miami River Bayfront Walk purposes and other approved uses. the applicant shall Indemnify the Off -Street Parking Authority for any loss of metered parking spies attributable to providing adequate access to the hotel. t' t ' GAL"• • t. .. _RAM t .. ..... •. .. . • ... �, •.\ter w•+.► wi: •• •...• -. ..+e�+'+.,w...e.�.. '. �r irii..�r:++•.::rww:.:rwLtd •1• :...a..:\.s.+�':..r... �ir•r. wTwi1� .�iw:.�i�.+ •:i•�.' ii.� .Z w:.r..... . � .• ,;:1••�t•t9'\• .�uMwwAr.9�}"•'t M,:�••I�yyM/�;d�►t•M•�}�yrH.ri�N.nW..1�►%h ielyytiW �•,•.w.L.., t,...r...rrsa.tA•.e..•. .. •. • • • ..•.S �• . '5 ... • •• ♦«S • ... ,'\.. .. :t• . •e •. t.•• r.t•.�•.S'.;•y/�q�..1�•i n. 1:�•'••q'.1 .�•./••.r•• •Tll.r...M1••�'.•1.,•1•. '..._ 4 A u. "a Applicant will provide at least the equivalent of the spaces that would be required by the Dade County Zoning Code (section 33.124(a)) for exclusive use by condominium residents and quests. The Applicant may provide such parking supply through construction of additional salt -parking facilities; through facility redesigns through design for and provisions of valet parking, or a combination of the above methods. Environmental 12. The Applicant will report to the south Florida Rsgional Planning Council the results of its marine community survey before proceedinq on seawall renovation Zf viable marine communities are detected, the Applicant will incorporate, in its Corps of Engineers permit application, measures to minimise impact of seawall renovation on these organisms. 13. The Applicant will inform the Dade County Historic survey of the inception and timing of excavation for the project. 14. The Applicant shall secure a complex source permit prior to the inecption ot., construction. . ls. This Development Order shall be null and void if substantial development of the site has not befun within two years of the recorded date of the Dsv&lo•a-- order. , 16. The Applicant will incorporate all additional information requested by this Development order and revisions submitted by the Applicant subsequent to original submission of the Application for Development Approval into a cTM- plot* document and will provide copies in a timely manner to the south ftori Regional Planning Council, City of Kia" , Dade County and the Mate. ataa4.4 ,��,,�,Y.'p�+IM"G$i�7S< ��i`S!�#43t.4}.4H,=>'�f43fi•A14k`� tY'fi' ,'��++.+=w.mea..w.�.. . s -.�,�,•e,.�;�',;,..k'..•:t;-•.^�:�.aT.•.'�"�^.. f•.-., ..•--�, .. .., •, .... ^.. .,..a+.A•: `.!e = •..tee..=. -•Si��M.�.�Lsq-+:. '•''`'tee �. .^y. 4•.. .. .. i-P 17. TM Application for Developaiu.t Approval is incorporated herein by reference and relied upon by the parties in discharging their statutory -duties under Chapter 380 Florida Statutes. Substantial c Mliance with the representations contained in the Application for Development Approval is a condition for approval unless waived or modified by agreement among the parties. �x f ,S W4 ob RESOLUTION NO. 8 0. 7 0 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI COMMISSION AMENDING PARAGRAPH 7, EXHIBIT "A", RESOLUTION 79-396; , MAY 24,1979, BEING A DEVELOPMENT ORDER, APPROVING WITH MODIFICATIONS, THE BALL POINT (MIAMI CENTER) PROJECT: WHICH AMENDMENT REQUIRES AGREEMENT ON INTERIM TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY RATHER THAN PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT; FINDING THAT THIS AMENDMENT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION FROM THE TERMS OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER, AND FURTHER DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO SEND THIS RESOLUTION TO AFFECTED AGENCIES AND THE DEVELOPER. WHEREAS, the City of Miami Commission by Resolution 79-396, dated May 24, 1979 issued a Development Order, approv- ing with modifications, the Ball Point project, a Development of Regional Impact to be located on Tract D, DuPont Plaza (50-11), and WHEREAS, paragraph 7, Exhibit "A", of the Development Order requires the developer, Holywell Corporation, to submit documentation concerning the design and schedule for the imple- mentation of interim traffic improvements acceptable to the City of Miami prior to the issuance of a building permit, and WHEREAS, the projected construction schedules for the Ball Point project, now known as Miami Center, and the adjacent four block DuPont Plaza area pose severe time and operating constraints in the interim period, and "DOCUMENT INDEXIT E N ® � � 'I WHEREAS, a DuPont Plaza Task Force representing a Z�'ted private and public agencies, was appointed September S, 1950 by the Transportation Planning Council of the Metropolitan Planning Organization to expeditiously recommend a schedule of implementa- tion for interim and final traffic improvements to public agencies and private entities, and, WHEREAS, the Commission finds thit it is in the public interest to continue toiasstqe overall public andprivate coordination and participation in interim and final traffic ..99lutions-in the DuPont Plaza area by providing that Holywell Corporation reach agreement on interim traffic improvements prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy rather than a building permit; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. Paragraph 7, Exhibit "A", Resolution 79-396; May 24, 1979, being a Development Order, approving with modifications,. the Ball Point (Miami Center) project is hereby amended in the following particulars. — Traffic Access and Parkin g 7. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, -for parking and enclosed areas, (permits for such matters as foundation, seawall renovation and site prep- aration will be issued, however, upon proper applications therefor, before such approval is required), the Applicant shall, using assumpt ions, and generation rates acceptable to the Dade County Department of Traffic and Transportation ("County") and to South Florida Regional Planning Council ("Council"), prepare `4 !/Words and/or figures stricken shall be deleted. Underscored words and/or figures constitute the amendment proposed. The remaining provisions are now in effect and remain unchanged. I i and submit appropriate data and documentation affirmatively demonstrating to the satisfac- tion of the City of Miami Public Works and Planning Departments ("City") and the County acceptable interim improvements to alln road- ways to operate at levels of service acceptable to the City and the County in the A.M. and P.M. peak hours pending the completion of final traffic improvements. The data and documenta- tion shall also include projections acceptable to the City, the Council and the County establish ing when implementation of interim solutions shall be required in whole or in part. Such projections shall be reviewed annually after beginning of occupancy and, when appropriate, modified by the City, the Council and the County. The Applicant shall pay its equitable share of the cost of imple- menting the acceptable interim improvements. Prior to the issuance of a bu&4d&ng-perm#V certificate of occupancy for parking and enclosed areas (permits for such matters as foundation, seawall renovation and site preparation will be issued, however, upon proper applications therefor before such approval manner acceptable to the City or the County, sucn equitable share and bond that amount with the City or the County. Prior to the issuance of a bv&l Ong peunt certificate of occupancy for parking and en- closed areas (permits for such matters as foundations, s;. [7 i seawall renovation and site preparation will be issued, however, upon proper applications, therefor before such approval is required), the Applicant shall obtain a commitment on the part of the City and the County to implement the acceptable interim improvements by the time "SU:�"'�T I V E � � indicated by the projections. Copies. of docu- - �'•'� NT D`,l�Jt.1 manta, data and commitments shall be sent to FOLLOW the Council and incorporated into the Applica- tion for Development Approval." Section 2. The City of Miami Commission finds that this amendment to paragraph 7(above) does not constitute a sub- stantial deviation from the terms of the Development Order approved by the City of Miami Commission by Resolution 79-396 dated May 24, 1979. Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to immediately send certified copies of this Resolution to the Florida Department of Community Affairs, Division of Local Resource Management, 2571 Executive Center Circle East, Tallahassee, Florida 32301; to the South Florida Regional Planning Council, 1515 NW 167th Street, Suite 429, Miami, Florida, and to the Holywell Corporation, 11 DuPont Circle, Suite 100, Washington, D. C. 20036. :f MAURICE A. FERRE T: FORM*"-- D�� CORK CTt 5i: EXHIBIT "B" --- ' Attached to, and made a part of Resolution J une 26, 1986 DEVELOPMENT OROER (AS AMENDED J UNE 26, 1986 ) Let it be known that pursuant to Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes the Commission of the City of Miami Florida has considered in public hearing held on May 24, 1979 the issuance of Development Order for Ball Point, a Development of Regional !. Impact to be located in the City of Miami, and has considered in public hearing held on June 26, 1986, the issuance of an amended Development Order for the Miami Center I project (A/K/A Ball Point Project) a Development of Regional Impact, located in the City of Miami. Pursuant to Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes and after due consideration of the consistency of this proposed development with pertinent regulations, and the Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council dated February 4, 1986, the Commission took the following action: Approval of this development, as amended, with' the following modifications concerning and limited to that portion of the development located on the southern (3.01 acres) portion of Tract 0, Block 1, DUPONT PLAZA (50-11) hereinafter referred to as "One DuPont Plaza" (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) (Exhibit "F"): Development 1. Condition 1, as it appears solely to the southern portion known as One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza), Exhibit -A, Resolution 79-396; May 24, 1979 is hereby amended in the following respects: 00ne DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) is limited to a project containing not more than (See Figures 1, 2 and 3 attached in the appendix): Phase 1 Component Units/Spaces Office Tower (722' NGVD + 65' Antenna) C ommmerc i a l Area ( Gross Square Feet) 700,000 160,000 Note: All language in Exhibit "B" following Condition 1 is new language; constituting a major amendment to the Development Order. While underlining has not been used; all language in Exhibit "B" should be interpreted as if it were underlined. Pe9e I of 16 '. _ .. Residential (in office tower) Parking Sub -Total Phase 2 Office Tower ( ON' NGVD + 65' Antenna) Commercial Residential (in office tower) R Sub -Total 60 units 1,200 spaces 90 units Total (excluding parking) *Note: Equivalent to 600,000 square feet 120,000 --- 990,000 780,000 60,000 180,000 The project is subjectto schematic design drawings (Sheets 1-13) dated January 21, 1986, submitted by Schleicher -Soper, Architects, wherein 6 floors of residential are shown on the Phase I tower and 9 floors of residential are shown in the Phase 2 tower. Office uses may be substituted for these residential uses, at the option of the Applicant, without such action being considered a substantial deviation, subject to the approval of the Miami City Commission. Each Office Tower may include at the option of the Applicant a health club (1 floor); a restaurant (1 floor); an executive club (i floor); and a restaurant and cabaret on the top of the podium (on the roof or 11th floor), provided that these certain uses are included in the computation of "Commercial" above. The rink and roof garden on the podium level are considered open space. The project has been recommended for approval, in principle, by the Urban Development Review Board, on January 28, 1986, with the recommendation that at the time of issuance of Class C Permit, the project shall again be reviewed by the Urban Development Review Board. The project has been exempted from the requirements of the Metro Dade County Shoreline Development Review Ordinance (metro Dade County Ordinance 85-14) by letter of January 17, 1986. The Atlanta Office, Federal Aviation Administration has no objection, if the height of the building plus antenna is WAI MSL per letter of February 7, 1986; the Dade County Aviation Department has no objection if the height of the Page 2 of 16 f zp 9 L ? _- t� fi a -S building -plus antenna is 949' MiSL. Therefore, no permit will be isiuO—for buildings and antennae on the site whose height would exceed 899' unless the Atlanta office of the Federal Aviation Agency states, in writing that they have no objection to a height of 949' MISL, in which instance the height of buildings and -antennae on the site are limited to 949' MST,. On June 2, 1986, the Miami Zoning Board granted a variance from the off-street truck loading bay requirements of Section 2023, Zoning Ordinance 9500. The Applicant will supply 3 of 10 required bays 12' x 35' x 15' in size and 4 of 8 required bays 12' x 55' x 15' iQ size. The Applicant proposes to lease 600 parking -spaces should a parking structure be built on the adjacent vacant block in DuPont Plaza. A* grant of special exception for off-street parking per CBD-1 zoning district, of Zoning Ordinance 9500 from the Miami Zoning Board and a Class C Permit may be necessary, should such a parking structure be proposed for construction." THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY SHALL: Environment 2. Remove all invasive exotic plants from the project site as the site is cleared, and use only those plant species specified in Attachment 1 in future project landscaping. 3. Have a professional archaeologist on -site during all earthwork, notify State and County archaeologists of construction schedules, delay *construction up to three months in any area where potentially significant historic or archaeological artifacts are uncovered, and for a reasonable time and in a manner calculated to minimize any interference with construction, permit State and local historic preservation officials to survey and excavate the site. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for Phase 1, provide funds on deposit or a performance bond in the amount of $500,000, and construct, using the Applicants' funds, and complete prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 1, the Riverwalk and provide furniture, lighting and landscaping pursuant to City of Miami Riverwalk and Baywalk Guides and Standards (the Guidelines) in effect at the time of adoption of this Development Order. The Applicant will design the Riverwalk area adjacent private space to allow views and access from private establishments, while fostering Page 3 of 16 �z 1l - - __ ,.._...,..-..., -—"-`L""` ..r t .."_-.�•t-.:5.,.ao�--.:,�.um.L�iir.,t"�, a`�"—. -- S. 6. 7. appropriate public use of the Riverwalk. Final landscape plans for -the Riverwalk are subject to the approval of the Planning Department, in consultation with the Fire Department, prior to the issuance of a building permit. The Applicant shall incorporate, in Phase 1 of One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza), a minimum of 20,000 gross square feet of sidewalk cafes, restaurants and other retail uses in the area immediately adjacent to the Riverwalk (area already included in area computations of Condition 1). At the onset of Phase II, the City will reinstitute the requirement of a performance bond in the amount of $500,000 to guarantee that the Rivervalk, if damaged by construction, will be repaired. , (The Riverwalk easement and perpetual maintenance agreement have been previously required in Condition 3, Exhibit "A" of the original Development Order dated May 24, 1979 (attached). Prior to the issuance of a building permit for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 1, provide funds or a performance bond in the amount of $500,000 and construct, using the Applicants funds, and complete prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 1, a landmark focal point including, for example, a water feature, significant artwork, landscaping, lighting and furniture at the southerly end of S. Biscayne Boulevard (extended) subject to the approval of the Planning Department, it being understood that said landmark focal point is of direct benefit to the project in ameliorating the bulk of the project and providing pedestrian amenities. The Applicant is to provide perpetual maintenance. (Dedication is required pursuant to Condition 9, Exhibit "A" of the original Development Order dated May 24, 1979 (attached). (Deleted) Design, construct, and maintain the stormwater management system to meet the following standards: . During the construction of One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza), place rip -rap, temporary berms or other barriers to prevent discharge of construction -related runoff to the Bay. . Construct permanent berms or barriers, at least one foot above grade, along the eastern and southern perimeter of the site. Retain the runoff from a 25-year stoma on -site, and construct the project drainage system in accordance with all representations in the amended Application for Development Approval. Page 4 of 16 Route any and all parking area washdown water through oil and grease. interceptors to a sanitary sewerline or prohibit any and all washdown of project parking garages. 8. Incorporate into the development, by restrictive covenant and lease or sales agreements, hazardous materials accident prevention, mitigation, and response standards. At a minimum, these standards shall: Require that areas within buildings where hazardous materials or hazardous wastes are to be used, generated, or stored shall be constructed with imRervious floors, without drains, to ensure containment and facilitate cleanup of any spill or leakage. Require that the loading/unloading of any hazardous material or hazardous waste shall occur in a covered loading/unloading dock with a spill containment area not connected to the project drainage or sewer system. Prohibit any outside storage of hazardous materials or hazardous waste. Require all hazardous waste generators to contract with a licensed public or private hazardous waste disposal service or processing facility and to provide to the Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) copies of one of the following forms of documentation of proper hazardous waste management practices: a hazardous waste manifest; .proof of shipment to a permitted hazardous waste management facility; or a confirmation of receipt of materials from a recycle or a waste exchange operation. Notify any tenant generating wastes of the penalties for improper disposal of hazardous waste pursuant to Section 403.727, Florida Statutes. Allow reasonable access to records and facilities for monitoring by the City, the Dade County DERM, and the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation to assure compliance with this Development order, and all applicable laws and regulations. For the purposes of this Development Order a hazardous waste generator shall be defined as the Applicant and any tenant of the Applicant that falls under a SIC code listed in Attachment 3 attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and that uses, stores, or generates hazardous wastes. Hazardous wastes are defined as ignitable, corrosive, toxic, or reactive wastes, including those identified in Attachment 4; n provided, however, that the uses in Attachment 3 and the wastes in Attachment 4 shall be simultaneously amended upon the addition or deletion of any or all of the listed uses, materials, or wastes by amendment to the "County and Regional Waste Assessment Guidelines" incorporated by reference into Rule 17-31.03(21), Florida Administrative Code. Safe and 5ecurit 9. Prior to issuance of a building permit for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase I, enter into an agreement with the City to contribute a fair share% for capital facilities required to provide adequate fire service to the project if requi red by the City, or, in the alternative, -pay a fair share contribution pursuant to an adopted City impact fee ordinance pertaining to fire service, if such impact fee ordinance is adopted by the City prior to obtaining certificate of occupancy for more than 980,000 gross square feet of development or, in the alternative, if such impact fee is adopted by the City whichever within the next 5 years is earlier, excluding existing development on- si te. 10. Collaborate with the City of Miami Fire Department to ensure that appropriate fire safety measures are incorporated into the project design and construction, through the approval of construction documents by the Fire Marshal. 11. Collaborate with the City of Miami Police Department to incorporate adequate security measures and systems into the design and operation of the project. The Applicant will submit the preliminary drawings prepared by Schleicher -Soper, Architects, dated January 21, 1986 to the Police Department within 120 days of the effective date of this Development Order. The Police Department may request more detailed construction documents and, at their option, may prepare a safety and security report. The Applicant shall respond to the Planning Department, in writing, how and to what extent the recommendations of the Police Department have been incorporated into the design construction and operation of the project,. prior to the issuance of any building permit. 12. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for One DuPont Plaza (FAIA Biscayne Plaza) Phase 1, enter into an agreement with the Police Department to contribute a fair share of police capital facilities needed to resolve City concerns, as determined by the City, or, in the Page 6 of 16 13. alternative, pay a fair share contribution pursuant to an adopted City impact fee ordinance pertaining to police facilities, if such impact fee ordinance is adopted by the City prior to obtaining certificates of occupancy for more than 990,000 gross square feet of development or, in the alternative, if such impact fee is adopted by the City within the next 5 years, whichever is earlier, excluding development on -site. Provide interior and roof space on either or both of the towers, during and as part of the initial construction of One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza), if required by the City, for a communications antenna and supporting structure for the City's emergency communication system. Said antenna and appurtenances, together with necessary services shall be at City of Miami expense. The Applicant shall retain the right of architectural structural and engineering approval and said antenna shall not exceed the FAA approved height. Energy Conservation 14. Incorporate the following energy conservation measures into the development: a. Maximum flexibility of air conditioning systems to cool only occupied areas (on a floor -by -floor basis at minimum). b. Air distribution using variable air volume systems, if feasible. c. Mini" air conditioning energy efficiencies (EER) of 10.0 in buildings less than or equal to 260,000 square feet, and 12.0 in buildings over 250,000 square feet. d. Heat producing areas and equipment (cooking, water heating, etc.) isolated from air conditioned areas. e. Computerized elevator control system in all structures over 10 stories. f. Natural gas or other non -electric energy sources for cooking and water heating in restaurants, where feasible. g. Solar water heaters or waste heat recovery units to preheat cooking and washing hot water in restaurants, etc., where feasible. h. Hot water temperatures set at or below 1050F where allowed by health codes and equipment requirements. i. Lavatory water flow of 0.8 gallons per minute or less than water closets that use no more than three and one-half gallons per flush. j. Tinted glass to reduce the amount of direct sunlight entering air conditioned areas. Page i of 16 = Y' 11 k. Light -reflecting and/or light colored Nall and roof surfaces, with solar absorption coefficients less than or equal to 0.50. 1. Electrical metering on a floor -by -floor basis. m. Computerized energy management system capable of start/stop optimization, demand lighting, lighting control, and zonal control. A statement showing the extent of design compliance with these criteria from the engineer(s) responsible for the design of the mechanical, pl uimbi ng and electrical systems shall be fi 1 ed prior to the issuance of a building permit for each phase of One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza). Traffic Access and Circulation 15. Incorporate the following into the project design and operation to minimize the cwnulative impact of project traffic, and its associated pollutant emissions, on air quality: . Designate three percent of on -site employee parking spaces, located as close as possible to elevator and building entrances, for exclusive carpool or vanpool use. . Activbly encourage and promote car and van pooling by establishing a car pool information program. • Provide Metrorail, Metrobus, and Metromover route and schedule information in convenient locations throughout the project. 16. In the event that the Applicant leases parking spices in a parking garage to be constructed in any of the three vacant blacks in DuPont Plaza, subject to a grant of special exception by the Miami Zoning Board for the parking garage, the Applicant shall fund, design and construct an upper level pedestrian connection across S. Biscayne Boulevard, between the One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) project and the parking garage or a building located on the opposite side of Biscayne Boulevard, subject to the recommendation of the City of Miami Department of Public Works and subject to the issuance of a special permit by the Miami City Commission specifying physical clearances and amounts of public liability insurance to be provided by the Applicant. The Applicant is responsible for filing a covenant to this effect to be recorded effective with the effective date of this Development Order. [See also Condition 5, Exhibit "A" of the original Development Order, as amended (attached)]. Page 8 of 16 17a. Replat the southern 3.01 acres of Tract D, Block 1, DuPont Plaza (50-11) prior to obtaining building permits for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 1, subject to the normal requirements for subdivision improvements. The Applicant will dedicate all necessary easements and rights -of -way which are located on the southern portion of Tract D, Block 1, DuPont Plaza (i.e., the One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) property) which are for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) and which are required by the City, County, or State in order to construct required transportation improvements made necessary by One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza), including the second -level pedestrian system referred to in Condition 16 above, if constructed. 17.b. Within 18D. days of the date of issuance of the Development Order, the Applicant is to present a traffic analysis demonstrating that the FDOT- approved Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp system (Figure 4) will accommodate the projected traffic for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza), both Phase 1 and 2, said traffic analysis subject to the approval of FDOT in writing. 17c. Prior to obtaining any building permits for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza), in the event that construction of the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System has not begun, fund or construct 100 percent of the interim roadway improvements identified as A(1), AM, A(3) and AM in Attachment 5 (or suitable replacements mutually agreed upon by the City's Department of Public Works, Applicant, Dade County Department of PubliCr Works, FDOT, and SFRPC staff), to the City, pursuant to s. 380.06(15)(e)2, Florida Statutes. 17d. In the event that the current Florida Department of Transportation approved design for the I-95 Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System (Figure 4) is superseded by the proposed Downtown Development Authority Alternative (Figure 5), fund a fair share of the incremental costs or receive a credit for any incremental savings (See Condition 179) (See Attachment 7). If the Applicant's proposed modifications (Figure 5) are approved, fund the following items: I tem FDOT Plan Modifications Conversion of Ramp Embankment C Service Road Geometric Modifications of SE 2nd Avenue/ Biscayne Boulevard May Intersection $ 56,000 ' t 55,000 S 39000 S 39000 3138,000 -+ (or FOOT bid award, whichever is greater) In this event, funds shall be made available in a timely manner, prior to the FDOT bid award for the selected Bifurcated Ramp System; prior to issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase I, or by January 1, 1990, whichever is earliest — pursuant to s. 380.06(15)(e)2 Florida Statutes. 17e. Prior to obtaining either a Certificate of Occupancy of any kind for Phase I or a building permit for Phase 2, fund 100% of street improvements whose traffic is predominantly attributable to the project (61% of all traffic Is inbound to the project) and a fair share of local surface street improvements identified in the current FOOT approved design for the I-95 Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System (Figure 4) or a) in the proposed ODA Alternative (Figure 5) or b) the Applicant's proposed modifications (Figure 6) as and if approved by FOOT pursuant to s. 380.06(15)(e)2 Florida Statutes. The Applicant's fair share shall be based pro-rata on traffic generated by the existing Miami Center I project, Southeast Financial Center, traffic attributed to development in the vacant 3 blocks of DuPont Plaza equivalent to that approved by the City in the expired Miami Center II Development Order, and One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phases 1 and 2 separately. No Certificate of Occupancy will be issued for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 2 unless these surface street improvements have been completed. 17f. If a public sector financing package has not been committed prior to December 31, 1991, then, prior to. obtaining any building permits for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 2, front-end, which may include arranging loans to, or bond purchases from, appropriate goverment agencies, $517,000 (1985 dollars) to FOOT, based on an equitable reimbursement agreement among appropriate parties which shall specify interest rates and maturity dates, as the development's fair share contribution to the Brickell Avenue River Bridge replacement. Page 10 of 16 W- 17g. If a public sector financing package has not been committed prior- to December 31, 1991 then, prior to obtaining any building permits for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 2, front-end, which may include arranging loans to, or bond purchases from, appropriate goverment ;x agencies, $S,021,000 to FDOT, based on and equitable reimbursement `= agreement among appropriate parties which shall specify interest rates and maturity dates, as the development's fair share contribution to the ;r Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System. Minority Participation . 18. Within 6 months of the effective date of this Development Order, prepare a Minority Construction Contractors/Subcontractors Participation Plan and submit it for comment only to the City's Minority Procurement Officer, who will compare it with the objectives of Ordinance 10062, the Minority Procurement Ordinance. 19. Within 6 months from the effective date of this Development Order prepare a Minority Participation and Employment Plan and submit it for comment only to the City's Minority Procurement Officer, who will compare it with the objectives of Ordinance 10062, the Minority Procurement Ordinance. General 20. Integrate all original and supplemental ADA information into a consolidated Application for Development Approval (CADA) and submit two :. copies of the CADA to the Council, one copy to the City, and one copy to the Florida Department of Community Affairs within thirty (30) days of the effective date of the Development Order. The CADA shall be prepared.as follows: a. Where new, clarified, or revised information has been prepared subsequent to submittal of the ADA but prior to issuance of the 00, whether in response to a formal statement of information needed or otherwise, the original pages of the ADA will be replaced with revised pages. b. Revised pages will have a "Page Number (R) - Date" notation, with "Page Number" being the number of the original page, "(R)" indicating that the page was revised, and "Date" stating the date of the revision. 21. Within 30 days of the effective date of this Development Order, record the Ll 22. Court; pursuant to Section 380.06(14)(d), Florida Statutes (1985). specifying that the Development Order Exhibit "A" runs with the entire site and that Exhibit "D" runs with the southern portion of Tract D, DUPONT PLAZA (50-11) (AKA One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phases 1 and 2) and is binding on Miami Center Joint Venture, its successors, and/or assigns, jointly or severally. Submit an annual report to the South Florida Regional Planning Council. City, and Florida Department of Community Affairs on each anniversary of the effective date of the Development Order, which report shall include, at a minimum: ` a. A complete response to each question in Attachment 6. b. Identification and description of any changes in the plan of development, or in the -representations contained in the ADA, or in the phasing for the.reporting year and for the next year. c. A summary comparison of development activity proposed and actually conducted for the year. d. Identification of undeveloped tracts of land, other than individual single family lots, that have been sold to a separate entity or developer. e. Identification and intended use of lands purchased, leased or optioned by the developer adjacent to the project site since the Development Order was issued. f. An assessment of the Applicant's and the local government's compliance with the conditions of approval contained in the DRI Development Order and the commitments which are contained in the Application for Development Approval. g. Specification of any amended DRI Application for Development Approval or requests for a substantial -deviation determination that were filed in the reporting year and to be filed during the next year. h. An indication of a change, if any, in local goverment jurisdiction for any portion of the development since issuance of the Development Order. i. A list of significant local, state and federal permits which have been obtained or which are pending by agency, type of permit, permit number, and purpose of each. J. A statement that all persons have been sent copies of the annual report in conformance with subsections 380.06(14) and (16), Florida Statutes. Page 12 of 16 i k. A copy of any recorded notice of the adoption of the Development Order 'or any subsequent modification that was recorded by the Applicant j pursuant to Subsection 380.06(14)(d), Florida Statutes. 1. Copies of one of the following documentations of appropriate disposal of all hazardous waste: a hazardous waste manifest, ?' a bill of lading from a t: bonded hazardous waste transporter indicating shipment to a licensed hazardous waste facility, or a confirmation of receipt of material from a recycler, a waste exchange operation, or other permitted hazardous waste management ;.: facility. m. For any condition that cannot reasonably be monitored as part of the local permitting and inspection processes, a notarized affidavit assuring compliance with such Development Order conditions shall be included. n. Any other information required by the Department of Community Affair (OCA) in accordance with Section 380.06(14 and (16), Florida Statutes (1986). THE CITY SHALL 23. Hereby designate the Planning Director to monitor compliance with all conditions of this Development Order. Specific monitoring procedures include: Review and evaluation of the annual report to be submitted by the Applicant by Condition 21 herein; and Review of Development Order conditions prior to a recommendation that a building permit or Certificate of Occupancy be issued by the City pursuant to Condition 28 herein. 24. Hereby incorporate the One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 1 and 2 timeline (Figure 7), which timeline will be used by the Planning Director in monitoring specific conditions of the Development Order as they relate to city permitting for specific components or phases; provided, however, that deviations from the timeline shall not be construed to be substantial deviations from the terms of this Development Order. 25a. Withhold building permits or Certificates of Occupancy, as the case may be, until the requirements of Conditions 4, 5, 6 and 17a have been met. Page 13 of 16 4 25b. Withhold any building permits until the traffic analysis in Conditi0frl7b is approved by FDOT, in writing. The absence of FDOT approval shall create reasonable likelihood of additional regional impact causing the development to be subject to further development of regional impact review pursuant to s. 380.06(19)(a) Florida Statutes. 25c. Pursuant to Section 380.06(15)(e)2, Florida Statutes, withhold issuance of Certificates of Occupancy for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) until all interim road improvements identified in Attachment 5 are constructed as required by Condition 17c. 25d. Withhold any Certificate of Occupancy for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 1, if funds have not been supplied for the I-95 Downtown Distribution Bifurcated Ramp System modifications pursuant to Condition 17d if a) the proposed Downtown Development Authority Alternative (Figure 5) with or without b) the Applicant's proposed modifications (Figure 6), are accepted. 25e. Withhold any Certificate of Occupancy for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 1 and building permits for Phase 2 if funds for local street improvements, required by Condition 17e have not been deposited; no Certificate of Occupancy will be issued for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 2, unless the local street improvements have been completed. The City does not guarantee the completion of these improvements. 25f. If a public sector financing package has not been committed prior -to December 31, 1991, withhold issuance of any building permits for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 2 until the Applicant funds, $517,000 to FDOT pursuant to Condition 17f. 25g. If a public sector financing package has not been committed by December 31, 1991, withhold issuance of any building permits for the One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 2 until the Applicant funds $5,027,0O0 to FOOT pursuant to Condition 17g. 25h. Withhold issuance of any building permits for the One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 2 portion of the project until a) construction has commenced on (i.e., upon execution of a contract for construction of) the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System and b) FOOT has provided written assurance that the scheduled completion date for the Ramp System occurs prior to the scheduled completion date of Phase 2. Page 14 of 16 26. Hereby; stipulate that this project shall be subject to an iniact—fee ordinance applicable to the Omni/Downtown/Brickell area, if such ordinance is adopted by the City within 5 years of the effective date of this Development Order, to be paid at the time of issuance of any building permit, provided, however, that funds, (but not loans) required by conditions of this Development Order shall be off -setting credits against separate categories of the impact fees, further provided that no refund will be made if the funds, (but not loans) required by conditions of this Development Order, cumulatively exceed the amount that would otherwise be paid under the separate categories in,the impact fee ordinance. 27. Hereby stipulate that for a 5-year period commencing with the effective date of this Development Order, no application for rezoning the southerniy 3.01 acres of Tract 0, Block 1, DuPont Plaza (50-11) will be accepted administratively which a) further restricts the uses allowed; b) reduces the amount of development (square foot area) or intensity (Floor Area Ratio) or c) reduces the density (number of dwelling units or parking spaces) provided in this Development Order; further provided, however, that upon a finding that substantial changes have occurred in the conditions underlying the Development Order; or that the Development Order is based on substantially inaccurate information provided by the Applicant in the amended Application for Development Approval, or that a change is clearly established to be essential to the public health, safety or welfare, the City may downzone the property, further provided that the City may otherwise adopt zoning regulations which do not restrict uses, or reduce density or intensity and other ordinances essential to the public health, safety and welfare which may affect this property. 28. Hereby stipulate that the following actions considered by the South Florida Regional Planning Council in their Report and Recommendations dated February 4, 1985, may be undertaken at the Applicant's option and written notice to the Planning Director with an exception, and will not be considered to be substantial deviations from the terms of this Development Order: . Substitution of up to 300,000 square feet of office or use for an equivalent amount of residential use upon the approval of the Miami City Commission, or Page 15 of 16 + 'pie.,. r •F:• _ 29. . Relocation or transfer of restaurants, health clubs cabarets and other retail uses and floor areas described in the ADA among the podium or towers of Phases 1 and 2 provided all such commercial space cumulatively does not exceed 220,000 square feet, or • Addition to, or deletion of, up to five (5) percent of the gross floor area of either Phases 1 or 2, provided that the cumulative totals of additions and deletions conforms to the parameters in Condition 1. . Deletion of up to fifteen (15) percent of the gross floor area of either phases 1 or 2, provided that such reductions are proportionate among the uses in Condition 1 and that the parking garage is not reduced. . Substitution of the a) DDA modification (Figure 5) or b) the Applicants modifications (Figure 6) to the FOOT approved Downtown Distribution Bifurcated Ramp System (Figure' 4), as and if approved by FDOT, subject to applicable provisions of Conditions 17 d and 17g. . Delays or advances in the timeline specified in Condition 24. Stay the effectiveness of this Development Order - Exhibit "B" - if One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 1 is not under construction within three (3) years from the effective date of this Development Order. "Construction" is defined as the issuance of a foundation building permit and completion of construction allowed by the foundation permit; ."effective date" is defined as forty-five (45) days after issuance of this Development Order by the Miami City Commission. In such an event no development permits thereunder shall be granted, until such time as an Amended ADA, providing updated information, is submitted to the Council, City, and State and an Amended Development Order issued. Should the Development Order be stamped pursuant to this Condition and an amended Application for Development Approval as herein provided is not submitted within one year after such stay is imposed, this Development Order - Exhibit "B" - shall expire and shall thereafter have no further force or effect. Exhibit "A" of this Development Order continues to run with the land. Page 16 of 16 4 . EXHIBIT Attached to, and made a part of Resolution 'L OF REGIONAL IMPACT DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT FOR `4 MIAMI CENTER 1 a ar Locet*d In Miam1 23.07 a south flodda regional planning council 3"0 r+oiyw000 *NO, suire 140. honyw000. Nonoo 33021 broward (30) 961.2999 docsr (305) 620.4266 February 4, 1986 The Honorable Xavier Suarez Mayor, City of Miami 330 Pan American Drive Miami, Florida 33133 Door Mayor Suarez: The South Florida Regional Planning Council has officially adopted the enclosed Regional impact report for.the Miami Canter I Amended ADA and forwarded copies to the Florida Department of Carmunity Affairs, and the South Florida Water Management District. This report is provided for your use in reviewing the Development of Regional impact pursuant to Section 390.06, Florida Statutes. While the staff of the Council Is available to assist in the resolution of anyimetter regarding the report, the Council has no legal mechanism through which it can act on this report again, except through appeal procedures. Recent changes to Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, and Rule 9.1-2.25, Florida Administrative Code, are now effective and require changes to and set criteria for local government Development Orders. For example, 380.06t1S)b(e), F.S., now requires that: "local governments shall not approve a development of regional lapse+ that does not make adequate provision for public facilities needed to accommodate the impacts of the proposed development, unless the local government includes in the development order a ca m+itment by the local government to provide these facilities Consistent with development schedule approved in the development order..." Please review Council recommendations, Section 380.06, F.S.(1985), and Rule 9.1-2.25, F.A.C., carefully prior to issuance of the Miami Center 1 Amended Development Order. Copies of any development order issued with regard to this project must be transmitted to the South Florida Regional Planning Council and the Florida Depar+ment of Comunity Affairs, which have 45 days thereafter to make an appeal decision basea on whether the County's development order is consistent with the Council's report and rec*wende#ions and other requirements of the law. 44 v. rn; r The Honorable Xavier Suarez ` Page 2 February 4, 1986 If we can be of further assistance, plans* call. Sincerely, An* Delster Interim Executive Director AD/Mk Enclosure cc: Sergio Rodriguez John Lefley Ethan Mlnksy, Esq. Lee.Rowlinson _ Roy Kenzie Ted Gould David C. Rhinard Paul Soper, Jr. Russell Wirth, Jr. Jeff Bercow, Esq. Wynelle Wilson MotthGW Gorson, Esq. John SalleyRoy Fernald Herb Zebuth Susan Coughanour Charles Knight Thomas Thomson George Firestone t. - - .Xir- k��,r..Yk".�"r.i:Y��>.i�t.$� 7ic?4tti4t i 1M td, u1 K .f , -+-.� z �s ; .�•L .:. __ �•, . ,. i.i.... t v:�•ti,+tM�t`n rl�'r.+a5—a �..,�t;X, TABLE OF CONTENTS . Pace OF FIGURES....................................................... iLIST LIST OF TABLES......................................................... LIST OF EX41SITS......... .............................................. INTRODUCTION.......................................................... 1 PART I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................ 4 ,., A. APPLICANT INFORMATION .................................. 4 L. PROJECT INFORMATION .................................... 4 PART 11. PROJECT IMPACTS AND ISSUES 11 ................................. A. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES 11 ...................... B. ECONOMY ................................................ 1S C. PUBLIC FACILITIES ...................................... 20 0. TRANSPORTATION 25 ......................................... r PART 111. COMMENTS FROM OTHER AGENCIES ............................... 51 PART IV. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................ 74 f< Fti =' , � r 3 f� ti LIST OF FIGURES F iF dui: Ti_ NE S 1 Location Map ..........' .................:..........:...... yMester Dsvelopeent Plan .................................. 7 3 Biscayne Plaza South Elevation .........•......•...... .... 8 1 Traffic Impact Area ...................................... 28 S Proposed Wdiflcations fo the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System ................................... 38 6 Current FDOT Design for the Downtown Distributor 81furesfed Ramp System ................................... a' T Existing Downtown People Mpver Station .............:..... 49 t _ r i, s_ i l f i f 1, �.� '� -- ���Y.h ,:�.c._+,.,it•'a��w.Frl�t�➢rit. �ri�*�tr�';_;k^`'i r ��; ram. �" 'vy{ ..p. ,Z; _a.r, .' u.� 1 „?+: "'�;,��'itv..� ��.,.err,,�sc.'Sas� fl..tr�t �`?.ds' E ���.a,z• -- — — C Tabit No. T.I+Ie P • 1 Previous Development Plans ............................... 6 2 Proposed Development and Phasing ......................... 9 3 Envlronmental Issues ...................:................. 12 4 Construction Costs ....................................... 15 S Permanent Employment Impacts (Alternate 1) ............... 17 6 Permanent Employment Impacts (Alternate 2) ............... 18 7 Permanent Employment by Sector (Alternate 1) ............. 19 a Permanent Employment by Sector (Alternate 2) ............. 19 9 Fiscal Impact (Alternate t) .............................. 21 10 Fiscal Impact (Alternate 2) .....:........................ 22 11 Meter, wastewaterq and Solid Waste ....................... 20 12 Existing Traffic Conaltions .............................. 27 13 Programmed Transportation Improvements ................... 30 14 Major Committed Developments ............................. 31 1S Trip Generrtion Rates .................................... 32 16 Cumulative Transportation Impacts 33 17 Cumulative 1994 Peak Ibur Traffic - AM ................... 34 id Cumulative 1994 Peak lour Traffic - PM ................... 35 19 'Modifications to the Downtown Distributor Stfurcated Ramps - Dupont Plaza Task Force 37 20 1994 levels of Service with Project Traffic and lmproovamo,ts............................................. 37 21 Additional improvements to the Downtown Distributor 81furcated Ramp System ................................... 40 22 Critical Intersections Without Bifurcated Ramp System .... 47 Exhlblt.No. T_f l Past Coder for Waste Types Cowsonly Assoclated with Each SIC Industry ................................:..... 93 Lis♦ of Potential Hazardous Waste Generators by SICCode..............................................e 94 Recomended Plant Specles .............................. 99 Proposed lnterlm Transportation lmproven+ents •.........• .103 fit • IN"MUCTI ON in May, 1979, the Council reviewed and approved the Miami Center Appilcation for Development Approval, located on a parcel of land In the Dupont Plaza area known as Bali Point, and recommenced project approval, subject to 10 conditions, to the City of Mimi. At the time of action On Miami Center 1, the Applicant, Molywell Corporation, was also planning to develop the remaining four blocks of Dupont Plaza. A primary concern expressed by Council members was that these remaining four blocks be master planned and developed with an integrated, compatible design and six of uses to create a quality urban environeent in the core of downtown Miami. Further, since public agency planning for a final transportation system to support the full buildout of Dupont Plaza was in the process at the time of the review of Miami Center I, the Council only required that the Applicant develop an interim traffic operations plan and implement those roadway Improvements which would both support project traffic and be compatible with whatever ultimate•transportation solution might finally be adopted for the entire area. On May 24, 1979, the City issued a Development Order, incorporating 17 conditions including the requirement for interim traffic improvements prior to issuance of building permits, approving Miami Center I. Holywell Corporation later secured options on three of the four remaining blocks in Dupont Plaza. On July 11, 1980, `outheas+ Bank, owner of the northeastern block, submitted an ADA to tha Council to construct a new Southeast Financial Canter on the fourth block. On July 14. 1980, Hol"oil Corporatton submitted an ADA to construct Miami linter 11 on the Other three blocks. Both ADAs were subsequently approved by the Council and the City. Council staff strongly urged the pc;pont Plaza area DR developers to cooperate in jolntly developing a final transportation Improvement plan. which would 1) provide acceptable levels of service in Dupont Plaza at full buildout, and 2) be compatible with public plans for the 1-95 bifurcated ramp extension and the Downtown People Mover system in Dupont Plaza. The Applicants agreed to cooperate with each other and with a task force of City, County, and State staff to develop an ultimate roadwey and transit system to support the three developments. As work began on the development of a final transportation solution for full builftvt of Dupont Plaza, Holywell Corporation was ready to obtain _ its building permlts for the now existing portion of Miami Center 1. It seemed prudent and certainly cost-effective to watt to determine what a y: intsrtm improvements should be required for Miami Center I until the final transportation solution was developed. Therefore, on September 25, 1960, the City of Miami Commission approved an amenoment to the Miami Center I Development Order, which postponed the requirement for interim -;N tmprovements�from prior to building permits to prior to issuing w certificates of occupancy. ; 4. Since 1980, the Southeast Sank Financial Center has been constructed in s Dupont Plaza: however, the Miami Center II project was never started enc its Development Order expired In 1985. Because the now-iwp i red Mi am i } 2 ?a i Center 11 Development Order reflected the impacts and Applicant 'fair share' for regional roadway improvements for both Miami Center i and 11, and the impacts of Miami Center I have changed due to substantial modifications to the project, this assessment reevaluates the impacts Of the Miami Center I. This assessment of the Miami Center I development has been prepared by the South Florida Regional Planning Council, as required by the Florida Environmental Land and Water Management Act for all Developments of Regional Impact. The assessment is based on Information supplied by the Applicant, Miami and Dade County staff, official plans, consul ants, and field inspection. Additional research relative to specific issues was conducted by Council staff where needed. In accordance with the Act, this assessment provides an overview of the positive and negetive impacts likely to result from the proposal. The recwww stions are Intended to assist the City Commission in reaching a decision on the proposed development through consideration of regional, } in addition to local, Impacts and issues. pt' Copies of any "development order" (an order granting, denying, or T. F; granting with conditions an application for a development permit) issued with regard to this project must be transmitted to the South Florida Regional Planning Council and the Florida Department of Community Affairs. ' 3 t ;. 9 ` tgiLt 1 IM11VIM MILOPOW /(Ails GAM POINT QI BALL /OINT/MIANI CpiTl11 I al =y 233 ALOOM[NT PLAN • We 11fl0 AS QUILT • lowf 'I �! GrsF� 5�:.+1 AsAO�eur! i Offles Tow O21P02O0 N/A Offlee Time "11O0O MIA a ""I TOW 33Or000 O3O NNNI Tome AO 'm 634 Opp I M l r CrfollliNe l p • 1ywl/ Town Oft 11"J" 230 a" lain *All+ T» A 0 It" MW out l♦ Total R3.TO0 NO Tihl • f1MNl1 119.(W MIA bNll �M.3O0 NL kM TWAT 2.363.700 1r13O Grow Te"I 141"'3OO du :�,[! Aar � • Phase 1 of the original Ball Point DRIq which includes the 35-dory Edward Sall Office Building, the 35-story Pavilion Mbtei. a five -story retail/parking structure (825 spaces). and a 325-space - office garage, has been cons+ruc+od on the northern portion of +ht sl+e. This developed portion of the project, known as Sall Point Plaza. was the subject of foreclosure proceedings against Holywell Corporation in October. 1985, and is now controlled by +he Bank of New York. The southern portion of the site. which is undlweloped, is owned by Pleml Con+er Join+ Venture and is +he subject of a contract of sale Op+lon +o Russell Wir+h end Company. This area, originaiIy proposed r: to con+ain 500 total fomominium units in two towers, proposes +wo predom inan+Iy office towers known as Biscayne Plaza Phase 1 and 2 (Figures 2 and 3). a Wky s � 1 � � �' i • �I o• f i ,rl %l e � f j • .. { •N, w• j,r r r 1 ]\ lo e•'• ... S;7rlAjY1Q' � �AeX� � _ /'ter • ` 1 % � � � `1 1 � — � . �,� • r a � W kit } . , SOURCE: ADA ELI i- FIGURE 3 81SCAYI.ai PLAZA SOUTH EL MION .� .. r1M 1"W'1 • too MOP &D1! •11 i ` •�• 4w'~ A/a AwkiftwN• ftwA M! •n • M 1ew milli •w a too* � r OHW w G.1� Mw r.�w ► u® f rWAw #M SOURCE: ADa 'bi fix.. .:_m. H i ..�_t �. ,. .,r _ �. v,....:. aN iii. ��.kiiinY'x kn:. ui e}kF3,i#�.E•"'a W1t''4.a L. an.-."J.�..LAI i��h, t fS'.'"Si _ LR .. f<2=Y SY,.$u.`3:f+'."`Lis..ri•".'ti#.4'+h.'g��1•"Arv'134"-25tux -', <w1e`i53tt"uiu..s::'3id ' - 'rim .•. The Biscayne Pieze project will consist of Phase 1: a 39-story @awes+ "s tower atop a 10-story ground podium with parking, office, and Weil ty uses, and N. 2: a 51®floor west tower which will be built upon , Vie podium constructed in Phase 1 (Table 2). The Applicant is proposing 60 executive apartments (120,000 square feet), 160,000 square feet of retail/colvmtercial space, 700.000 square feet of tC: office space, and 1,200 parking spaces. The commiRrcial space J � ;. t Includes a small (10,000 square feet) restaurant/cabaret in +he gorden park on the 11th (top) floor of the podium. The park will :. 1 Include an artlficial skating rink/dance floor. Phase 2 will zY include 90 executive apartment units (180,000 square feet); 60.000 , square feet of retail space. and 780,000 square feet of office h space. If marks+ condItlons are not favorable for the 150 dwelling units proposed in Phases I and 2. the 300,000 square feet will be converted t office space. ` rma 2 OMM40 OEIRL 1 "T AND "SING t l ON las• OYMrC L 1 Total81216 •1 (� IO.rrt 1 1 •Z rlpl al"W T91.000 434 toots 96.2117 0 tt110 HM fa1t�IM 6M.000 S.F. - elm sI Plata T00.000 0 160.ti00 60 units iNT 1169 Mae 1 - 120.a:0 S.F. t lasl . 9NIw1 9tus 7to,m 0 60.OD0 90 ttilltf it190. 1M1 z • It ttla ■a/W Is Y•teworable for t".tructleft of toy 190 rylC"tlal 11111t8. A"IIC"t 10111 pWONCt toe MOM seta. ta.t am attika *one. - ;•: >p1110E: A0s I ,f r 1-, f: A "tMrbor Pranenade" along the southern bounaary of the site .(adjacent to the Bay/River) will be constructed to provide a 4 pedestrian conneetion from the 6ayside project, through 9ayfront . ' Park-, to Miami Center. Ground f I oor refs t I /conxmerc i al space wl I I be located adjacent to the Promenade. J•' Y i _ kit t0 t �. 7 .X -� £t L ♦`. S t �'���r`Tti iv..t arr4t.. i`-'y...o�f,� LI.f... '!" t f }' �y .� � c a�' V" -i �a'2"c. d,....t/:. 1 is ai .t�...�. R T'"_5 �72 �..t�e .,}i�.Sfa�Zlrr -_ 2• I�i3.-3 �.—essi�..:::.3. h_ f6F •X• (.. Ff "'�cY.vLi,'..a�.s."...i ..l�br��:... R ,r i FE PART 11 • PROJECT IMPACTS AND ISSUES t� -A. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES 1• Sum-14 Table 3 summarizes the impacts of the project on the envlrornnent. Several issues are described below in more detail. { 2. Air Applicant estimates of one- and eight -hour carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations were made using computer modeling. The 'highest r• predicted eight -hour CO concentration of 7.4 (82 percent of a: State Standard) occurs in 1991. If project traffic is subtracted from the analysis, the predicted eight -hour 1991 .concentration drops to 3.7 ppm (41 percent of State standard). - - I,;•: Dade County maintains a permanent CC monitoring site at 101 Hagler Street, which has recorded many exceedances of CO standards over the last few years. Continued exceedances could result in the designation of the South Florida alrshed as a non-aftalrenent area for CO by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. South Florida is already a non -attainment area for ozone, although few exceedances of ozone standards have been recorded since 1982. rli:c f {� 2 4 . h( '• .. 'i i i �w �) is Yr'hf .kFt-.v"'.4.r� Ie�-ui.LvV.a9` .+'trbvl� S'. id�_drr �.- ..14A4c �. xntN Fa{?� �'x��{z��� � Y TABLE 3 ENVIRONMENTAL ISSIES ISSUE COMMENT Air Quality See Z. Lana and Soils The project site was created by extensive filling of Biscayne Say in the beginning of this century. Maps dating as for back as i0" show that the historic shoreline of Biscayne Say followed "a present location of Biscayne Boulevard. Some additional filling may be necessary to bring the site to required flood elevations. Exposed areas should be sprayedmulched or grassed. as necessary, to prevent soil erosion. r Flood From Areas The slate is located In a 100-year flood area and the minimum first floor elevation specified by the Federal Insurance Administration is +14.0 NGVO. Accord ins to the AppIIcon+, the ground floor, Well, office, and parking uses will be built at a minimum elevation of +S fee+ NGVC, which meets Dade County but not federal flood criteria. Occupants of the ground floor will not be eligible for federal flood insurance. All other areas of +he project will be above +14 feet MM , and therefore will be eligible for federal flood Insurance. Water, Drainage, and Sei 3.. Hazardous Materials Matlands, Vegetation, The site does not contain any wetlands or OW Wildlife itsnlflcant vegetation, and Is of little value +o wildlife. Only +hose ®cant species llsted In Exhibit 3 should be used In future project randscaping, - Historical art Archaeological According to the Dade County Historic Sites Survey, significant archaeological features and/or ar+ifoc+uol data may be deposited beneath fill along +he western boundary of +hf site. The Code County archaeologist should be notified of +he construction schedule and alloyed access to the sit* for monl+oring, and an archoeologls+ should be on s i+e during project eorr+h work. It. any archaeological finds are made, cons+ruc- tion should be delayed In that portion of the site antii officials Can take actions to survey and/or excavate the artifacts. SOURCE: ADA, SFRPC 12 a � ; 3. Water, Dralnage•, and Ne2ardous Materials f Soil borings done by the Applicant in 1979 shower that groundwater beneath the site is approximetely S feet below > existing grade. Groundwater beneath the site Is saline and should not be used for human consumption or irrigation. There are no surface water bodies on -site. Biscayne Bay, a State t Aquatic Preserve and Cv+standing Florida Water, is located 3: r immad Wely east of the project site. - ` According to the Applicant, the drainage system for the existing portion of Miami Center directs stormwater to a perimeter sxfiltration system trench. Runoff that exceeds the capacity of the trench system flows into aetention tanks ano then to drainage wells, which discharge runoff to the saline equlfer. The system Is capable of handling the 25-year storm. ,. t, . The proposed Miami Center drainage system will be aesignoo to :.: hendle a 25-year storm in the Sam* manner described rbove. Only runoff in excess of the 25-year design storm will leave . t:» site. i�h'�'.ik-. � �._ .i .4 x'::t..� i:� - ._?.. }, s, k .1 ,. r.,. tie-,-.5 s, "t^.i.� rr-�Ia.z1�{. '"'` :i'� ,T• yvs r-:��'w-�.� _"s'.',i�d MEN • was4ing corm the paved surfaces and +4*n routing the washdOwn water, which contain a greater mount of, and more highly concentrated, paitu+an+s than runoff from other onDsite Impervious. surfaces, through oil and grease interceptors into a sanitary sewer. This was4down program will not allow aischargo of polluted washdown water to the Siscoym* Aquifer. During construction of the remainder of Miami Center It +4e 4V. Applicen+ should place rlp-rap, temporary berms, or other trA barriers along the perimeter of the site to prevent-d I sc: harge P of cons+ruc+ion -related runoff to the esy. The design and -construction of the project should also include pormen*n+ berms or barriers, at least one foot above grade, so +no+ direct discharge to the Say does not occur after the project is complete. Another source of water pollution, potentially even more harmful +Nan s+ormwa+or runoff, is hazardous waste. Hazardous waste Is defined by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and toe State es waste that is Igniftblog.corrosive, reactive, or toxic. Exhibit I* Included at the and of this ORI Assessment, Is a list of S+andaro Industrial Classification (SIC) Codes for facillfles that have been found to provide one or more of the hazardous wastes listed in Exhibit 2. Those lists are excerpted from the Florida Water Quality Assurance Act 14 will furtmer reduce the possibility of adverse Impact on regional water Quality. 8. ECC "Y - 1. Project Costs Tab t summarizes project Costs, Incivaing construction a� osploymen+ and wages. TA�I,L • =47WXT1a cos» 1. 1.ae12r IMri sin "PO Plan 113tfw» P1.0 2 TNN iM 41.Np 100 taw 107.400 f0 x 111~ I01 S 1110.200 /5 iMMMe iswv �tm OW krava 11106aw .40M to - Pl tio■111q +; MAL" 120,00 110. "a ». ssr0 N f.200 TOW ProjW Car, - 9318.2 ■11l ton" } Catlarruetl� telwar+> S" 41"lov"S oor "of fir 9 "at's . 16.015 ■"lov" "Oral Qq►,�ryNl■N 10-1.6 611114N (122.164 "r o"I*"* "or bt, weal r a C•Wv®r CAIWAG. 122.21l seat, o" Owt test, ter h•> �= 111146wes ►le,■. Pw■w 1. o" 122.325 set, eviowe i voor fox iltc■"+, plit3. 040" 111 • 106 allows. r. N [■Clr■1w■ 1"WrtS' COSVS- 2. Permenem+ Emoloymeo TOO permanent project employment Is es+fms+od to be 12,144 for Alternate It which Includes 130 resIdonflal units (300,000 square feet), and 13,537 for Al+orna+o 2, which includes 300,000 additional square feet of office space and residential units. Because a majority of firms locating In now offices move from other office buildings In the Region, only about 25 percent of the jobs can be considered now to the Region. For Alternate I# assuming 2,497 new project employees, the Council estimates that now project employment, by its indirect and Induced effects, could generate up to 5,442 new jobs in the Region, wl+h 1,637, 3,716, and 69 In Broved, DW49 and ftnroe respectively. This employment corresponds to $108.5 million In +*+el wages and $184.1 million In value added to the regional economy (Table 5). Al+orna+o 2, assuming 2;762 now project emplawass could generate up to GsIOO now jobs In the Region, witti 19857, 4,165, and 78 In Broward, Dedo, and Wnroo, respectively. This amploymen+ corresponds to $121.5 million In total wages and ti $207.6 million In value added to the regional economy (Table Table 7 shows the sec+oral dis+rlbu+ion of permarie + employment on+ for Alternate I and Table 8 stiows the dls+rlbu+lon for, Alternate 2. 16 AW ?" TABLE ! s ` FEtIMANEt+T O�IPLOr1tLT IMPACTS IALTERNA'� I A. afterkin $0. ►LA. ►ALP 01101140 OAN ""Of REGIOII btACn Aa1CLLTIJIE. FaRESTRr. FISHING 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. AaICLLTUIIAL SERVICES 3. S. t. 10. 2. �• 0• MINING Tltt�TlON t• 74. 1. rtb. 0. 3. lose 41• ,� wut,FAcTIrII1� TRANSPORTATION AID UTILITIES 73. 49. 1ib. 227. t. 2. 28t. 274. 21. t4 IIIOUSALE 'MACE 28. 300. 113. 473. 1. 1b. 142. 7". 14• 'u RETAIL IRAN FINANCE• INS. ADO REAL ESTATE 473. 1 12. 1Nb. 223. j vIC[S bib. 160b. 31. 0. 2297. 0. 343. 00 z. VIAL 0. 107. 0. 3716. 0.5442. biz., • rt 9. TOTAL.AAWS 11000 $I "k �Aa1C117 , FaREST>tr. FISHING t9. b3. 0. 17. b4. 13b. 30. h AaICLLTUMt SEt1vICES 49. 10• 7b• 23. 2. 34. tb. tg MINING COiSTRtXTION 1724. 2439. 93.. 4278. Ms. k` wINIrACTue I IIG 1272. AM. 20. 93114. Pee'sM x 4� "Olt ORTATION APO UTILITIES 1�31. 3732. 82. 7143. Mt. 1RIa ULE IRAN GIs. 2437. 9063. 39. 244. 3000. $713. sb7. 1749. RTAiL TAM3471'• F1NAMN, 114. AID REAL tSTATE M32. 22574. 342. 32040. $Me 13494. 30691. bto. 45215. 7432• ; � T 493. lab. 25. ISM 292. 70TAL 32330. 74419. 1779. 101329. 17834. rx C. VALLE OF OLn1W 11000 S 1 Aa1CULTME. Ft�K37t11'• FISNIMi 12. 307. 0. 3". 9t0. Aalcmrd Ai KRvICSS 131. Me 0. 3". 1490 MIMINi 3b. b3. b. 12b. N. gill mt=I ON 7612. 11134. 420. 1"790 4401 • . IMI�AU;M IIIG 7"0. 29701. 129. 33813. "13.' T PISPORTATION NO UTILITIES 4062. 1740. 249. 217%. 11196. VMUSALE TRAM 1257. 40", t0. 4!26. 7!1 • _. NAIL TAM 7943. 1/347. 36b• 2"' 4003" F INNCE. " S.. NO REAL ESTATE 43413. 9111672. Is". 1433b2. 23091'. lRviCEs rug. Cm. 1"0. 91100. 19147, bOvltNdtNT 419. 14404 Us2010. 34�. ` VIAL 100703. 234321. 41111111. 33"1;. 36332. . 0. WAA AM cINO SI �At111CLLTMo Ir01 POTe FISHING 4b.� 133.• 0.• 1".� 453.E Aa ICILTUMAL SERVICES 73. In, 28. 229. 93. MINING 23. $2. 4. 71. 41. COi1tSCf ION 1111 • 272s. 1Oi• 4742. 1077. MANITACT ING 2m. 0643. 47. 12bbb• Me WANSIMPITATION AND UTILITIES 27i7. 11197. 171. 141133. 1342. NOW SALE IRAN 0113. 33". 65. 4294. 910. IVAIL TRADE 4030. 9106. 2". 10248. aml. FWA10E. INS. AIC REAL ESTAR 21697. 41013. 747. 71737. 11540. IRVICIS Ibi22. 43161. 1273. SUM. 10423. a,: @vERrwl!NT !9le 1110• 23. 1703. in. ' '"Al. 9370. 127MI. 2743• 169149. MW. NMts N4ioo►f ft" not %tot dui' to ro,"Ing. ■ i gi r tz TMLE 6 • PIKNNEW QPLOYMENT IMPACTS (ALTERNATE 2) A• EMLOIF14"T so. VIA. MLN 9MARO CAM 111MIC PIE010M KACM OR AICLLTWIE. RORES111r, PIPING • 0. • 0. • 0. Q. 0. AGRICLLTWuL URVICES 1, 6. 11 110 .. MINING 1• 1. 0. 2. 0. CON3711LICTION 64• 134. 4• 221• �. 11AM41Ni" I N0 6/ . 207. 1, 2". 0. TRANSPORTATION AND UrILIT1E5 No 252. 2. 304. 24. MKLSAU "AGE 32. 130. 1. 163• I6. IOTAIL 700E 332. Sao 20. 671• 175. F11Wao INS. A!O P2AL ESTATE 530. 1110. is. 1M1. 253. Soviets 736. 17". 33. DO. 364. KrERt4RMT 0. 0• 0. 0. 0. TOTAL 1457, 1149. 70. 6100. 171. B. TOTAL VMS (ION s) PAICLLTWX, FOU11111• RisNlle no 12.• 00 14. 219. NPICL WAL WIVIaS Sl. we 11i• 1319• ft. •INI I� t i • ' a. 2• 30. '�. . 1011 11100 2713. 109. 4m. 1104. tMIbRACTMINQ 13170 4412. 22. 9111. 0". 7I�WIVRTATfON W VTILITIES i471. 636S. V . 7134. 712. watt 10Aa 7U. 27". H. 3"1. 420, RT•1` 1oA0i 300. SM. 374. 1117, 1AS. 11010M, INS. AND P2AL ESTATE 11241. 25S41. 317. 37177. 5111. y =Rvta3 1.111• 30"0 tOti. l0406. on. ' ON111118"r 01• 1172• 20. 1710. 2". FERAL 30211. 1334/. 1110. 121545. 1"", AL %*Am OT OUTPUT (two $1 MtICILTME. tOKSTRY. PIsNIMi 102. 343: 0. 11i: tO1t3. AaICLLTIRAL KRv1c9s 106. 2460 S!. Y7. 162. NINItf1i 42. no 7. 115. 754- CaSTR(LT10N O66. 124". 4". 22041. 5006. 1Mr1/AGZIAIN6 OIK. 27126• I"o 3117460 St1W. I"PORTATIOM AND UTILITIES Olin. 1""* 3". 24263. 2177. z-. ` ttlaLtlAl� 11MAOE f.4�•4�2. 1724. ft. 72". W. WTA1L wom 1.,i t. 12123. M 22242. 4421. i 1111"a, INS. AND FOAL ESTATE /1606. 113200. 1711. 164721. SUN, >0 vlcgs 311467• 64l01. 2D62. 102456• 16667. W' 615. 1616. 34. 234i• 30. TOTAL 113602. X&OI 1. 34". 363f 16. su". L VAUX ABED 11000 1 ) •AWICLLTUAE. 11:1Es"r. AISNINO• St.� 170.E D., 221.0 " AOt1CLLTWIAL SPVICtS 64. 141. 31. 2%. 13. s; 11tI1IN6 26�. 4. 6i. N, �,:. OOtEtR�T10N q 21 o 3106. 120. 94". 1227. �: IMMIPACTUIING SM. 10474. it. 137fi1. 2246. }; 111ANSPO"ATION AM UTILITIES 3102. 1335A. 100. 1"47. 1414, 1114MESALE MW lit. SM. 63. 4136. $ib. WA IL T"M "16. 6322. 320. 11125. ITINAPLI" . INS. All HEAL MATE 2411017. 41744. 660. 82571. 13271. s"ICEs 201013. "1 is. 1411. Vi1T. its". `" K NNtldT 537. 1321. 21. 1as. 301. ' �. 60661. 1439". 3067. 2076b4.40 33N3. �: INhf 1Iw1w�• a" "t •M41 ISM w POW4ire. #� s0111103 S17trC Tom 7 eENMNT aftesm eY moult /ALIWTE i 1 Ilalasala Wall f*asa C9nsfrrcflaa MMws+cfwirg Trauron �il4l _ Trade_ EWE Services Bov.r t Total �' 316 N y0 7A0 I'm/,016 909 �.M3 1 IM 47 la 36 1.003 1 "i17 718 3.701 TOTAL Ata 424 131 207 036 7,910 5,573 1,627 12,.IAa fA/ILEt AOY1 1O _ TASLE 0 MIDIAWNT aftel"T eY SECTOR 1ALTOWIF 21 m olesal* Wall fto" Constrrctloa Wmwfacfrrlap Transaortatlon Trd. Trade services 6overae t Tqfal 1 307 332 92 116 77/ 2,074 4,056 909 e.654 106 47 too ss I."I Its" 710 3.130 TOTAL 151 Ito /29 224 634 3,306 5.573 1,627 12,"4 _ SOURCE t AM P Ot�: 1++....— ._. .,. �: .. . _ _� �,. ,_ _. _. ." _ _ ,- _. .: .. .., .. ,.. .. �: .. , . . _ ..: .,. i. - ,.: — .. reeve a, t reeve.. ... :...—,. _ ..., a'.� Gl'. .r , . ,..-.t,-.c rs .- i:�v .. _ • y - �. t 4., � i.. � 1 2 3. Fiscal Impact Using 1984 millege Was and historic average expenditures, Alternates i and 2 would have'a positive fiscal Impact of S3.2 million on the City of Miami, $2.3 million for Dade County. $2.4 million for the school district• and S0.2 million for the - : �: 4 i a .. '>..,.. : ., '.. r:xYY.•:',4 -nr. Y... ..A : r K ., � a :._.. ... .: .. -:.. .:... ... r.- t� ...4. �` TA9lE 10 FISCAt IWKT /AtIEIMMIIE 21 NAME OF DEVELOPMENT MIAMI CENTER I AIENWO M/OFFICE NO TAUE9•0 LOCAT100 Clir MIAMI COUNTY Dam SPECIAL DISTRICT SFUND/LIO &[:IDOL DISTRICT OAOE , TYPE OF DEVELOPTENT TOPRESIKUTIAL TYPE OF DWELLING UNIT 11M6LE-iAM/Ly MULTI -FAMILY MODILE-HOM TOTAL' NU"K" OF UNITS O 0 .0 O HUMMER OF STUDENTS PER WIT ., 0.00 0.00 0.00 .WJMWR OF PERSONS PER WIT :; 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL 041 KA OF STUDENTS O. RESIDENT POPULATION O. MUMMER OF EMPLOYEES 12114. PROPERTY VALUE 392734336. ANALYSIS CONDUCTED UBINS AVERASE COEFFICIENT! CITY COL ITY 9PECIAL 1119TRICT SCHOOL DIONICT TOTAL _ am -TIME REVENUES • 63"". • O. • 305111. • 0. • 943090. TOTAL NEW AMtRML EEFfNDITURES • 2254912. • 2327027. • 310901. • 0. • 1"3642. • TOTAI HEN Al"W REVENUES t 3112232. 6 4594232. 6 5"200. 6 2394711. 6 1IM80136. s v. 2. Police ono Fire Police service is provided to the development area from the City Of Miami Police Department on NW 2nd Avenue. Average police emergency response time in is 3 to S minutes: average routine police reponse is 30 minutes. The applicant indicates the project will include an on -site security system combining personnel and electronic surveillance and emergency response including uniformed and plain clothes security guards. in addition, access to building will be electronically controlled. City of Miami Fire Department will provide fire service to +he project from Station /1 on NE Sth Street, with a response time of under four minutes. The station is equiped with two engine companies, one aeries company, and one rescue company# and an on -duty staff of IS persona. City of Miami Fire Department is also available for emergency medical service. Randle Eastern Ambulance Service will provide emergency medical service to Miami Center 1 as part of their contract with the City of Miami. response times for downtown Miami currently average e to 10 minutes. 4 The city is presently developing an impact fee ordinate to be imposed at building permit Issurence, calculated based upon costs of necessary additional facilites needed to support 23 generator. The total energy consumption et project buildout is estimated to be 336.4 billion BTU's, or 98.6 million kilowatt hours. This is equivalent to the energy content of 2:2 million Fw gallons of fuel all. Since this is olectrlcai energy, three 1s times this amount of energy (6.7 million gallons of fuel all) x a must be consumed at the power plant to provide this energy to the slto. 'xr Because marginal costs are higher than average costs and ttie marginal costs for new tacillties are higher than the overage costs of existing facilities. the cost of providing additional electricity to reglonal users will be significantly higher than the typical costs todry. However, the new customers that need added generation capacity do not pay tha true marginal costs for.the added capacity. Indeed. the average cost t0 all consumers increases to cover the marginal cost of serving new cus+c mers. All electricity users in the Region subsidize the costs of new or expanded electrical facilities and the marginal costs incurred by the utility due to now consumers or increased use by existing consumers. Thus. it Is In the interest of all s electricity users in the Region to reduce the energy consumption and increase the energy efficiency of users in the Region as a way to retard the increase in average energy costs. One way this can be done is to require all new construction, =; large or small, to meet adequate energy efficiency standards. The inclusion of the energy conservation measures listed in 3 Condition 11 will reduce the pro j ecV s, energy use and assist In avoiding adverse regional energy Impact. , L• 0.. TRANSPORTATION Introduction In previously reviewed applications for development approval In the Dupont Plaza area (Ball Point, Miami World Trade Center (CenTrust), Southeast Bank Financial Center, and the now expired Miami Center II), transportation assumptions depended on a three point system consisting of: I) the Downtown People Mover System. 2) an improved street surface system, and S) the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated ramp system to access 1-95. As was mentioned in these previous reviews, the success of the downtown transportatlon system(as well as the ultimate viability of any developments In the Dupont Plaza 25 r ,, �i 4_ area) depends on all three points of the system being operational prior +o full bulldout of the area. Prior to July 1902, in the t, absence of an adopted fair share transportation policy +.a+ coula effactively analyze and address an Applicant's impacts on +has* i_. Improvements, Council requested that developers in the Dupon+ Plaza area arrange "front-end" loans for the bifurcated romp system in order tp assist in timely development of needed infras+ruc+urs. As buildout of this area is fast approaching, i+ sows not only prudent y' but necessary to mention these needed faci-li+tes again. S: • Two perts of the three part system are presently on-line, or are t. coming on-line in the near fu+ure, +hose being a version of the Down+own "is Mover System and major surface street lmprov4ments. < The third leg of this system, the Downtown Dls+ributor Bifurcated Ramp system, still remains in the planning sages. . As has also been noted in previous Application for Development -Approval reviews, +he Bali POin+ development was reviewed during +.4* long process +o assess end plan for the iu+ura +ranspor+a+ion system w in the Dupon+ Plaza area. As a result of this timing problem and in an offor4 tO assist in the timely development of the Hall Peoin+ property, i+ was agreed that +he trensport*+lon Impacts generated by Ball Point would be addressed In the Miami Cen+er If application. These Impacts were addressed in +he submitted Miami Center 11 applice+lon and also in +tie issuea Miami Center 11 Development 26 { prior to full bulldout of the area. Prior to July 1962, in the absence of an adopted fair share transportatlon poltey that could effectively analyze and address an Applicants impacts on these improvements• Council requested that developers in the Dupont Plaza area arrange "front-end" loans for the bifurcated ramp system In order to assist to timely development of needed infrastructure. As buildout of this area is fast approaching, it seems not only prudent but necessary to mention these needed feei-Itties again. Two parts of the three part system are presently on-line, or are coming on-line in the near future, those being a version of the Downtown People Mover System and major surface street improvements. The third leg of this system, the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp system, still remains in the planning stages. As has also been noted in previous Application for Development -Approval reviews, the Ball Point development was reviewed during the long process to assess and plan for the ¢uture transportation system in the Dupont Plaza area. As a result of this timing problem and in an effort tO assist In the timely development Of the Ball Point property, it was agreed that the trensportatlon impacts generated by Bell Point would be addressed in the Miami Center 11 application. These impacts were addressed in the submitted Miami Center it application and also in the issued Miami Center 11 Development a� Order. As the Miami Center 11 CO has now expired, end the current Miami linter project will create many of the impacts of the expired application, the impacts of the Miami Center I development have been addressed in this review. i. Existing Traffic The project traffic impact ores is bounded by 1-395 on +40 north, SE iSth Road on the South, 1-95 on the west, and °> 91scayne Buy on the east (Figure 4). Five roadway segments on five different roadways currently operate below LOS "D". These SF f0#dwsy segments and their respective levels of service are 5 shown i n' Tab 1 e 12. . } TAM 12 y. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS N,MeD�� Froms�=. K; ttM env. NE 4M Street W fOth Street s E K 2he Avenue NE ttth Street NE teen Street 3 E erietell Avenue SE 13th Street SE loth Street 2 F . So 2ne Avenue Oliver &low SM I" Street SM bd Avenue SW 3rO Avenue 3 E S011ICE s ADA Z7 x ji ' - ;. 2. Future background Traffic Impacts a. Programmed Improvements Approximately $103 million in roadway Improvements are = - programmes w1+Nin +tie traffic impact area, the most 1 significant of these improvements include 1) +4@ four downtown distributor improvements, 2) the Brickell Avenue bridge over the Miami River, and 3) +me SW 2nd Avenue bridge over +.te Miami River. Each needed improvement's description, year of construction. cost, and applicant 1 fair share is shown in Table 13. b. Background Traffic Projections Background traffic growth throughout the Impact area was projected at -2.4%e compounded annual I ye based on t!we average decrease in traffic volumes in the area curing t:we :z c y_ past five years. Projections were mace for 1994. No additional road segments would operate below LOS "0" wit: yT ttie addition of 1994 background traffic. :P 3. Ccwitted Development Traffic 2 Twenty-two comnwitted developm:mpmts were identified in the traffic Impact area. The names, locatione use, and scale of Y.` those developments are lis+ed in Table 14. The addition of G r: comitted eevelopment traffic to the 1994 programed network y results in no additional roan segment operating below LOS "0". 28 sit ' -41 ; * Z s 4 utM -- �.:. •v. xK t a ... .4 � r. _:, ♦ < ... Yt 4.-.... .. .. x .. .. '\.. u.vl ..,:. .. .. KP .3Pr.. L., }. „i...e, a. c •'_:.... t7x.,tP+r-. b. .J17. ., ..ry ... ?✓'J _. .. .. ,t.. ... .. .1..v_ .t. .. ,K F t Y. - " TALE 13 _ wmaur.�B MAlisf+estAna IWr1/1tMrs cost Constriction felt Share ISI.000/ ' Project llmltd Tree of tbrh 111.0001 Yoe►.- Fulstomm Proposed Total Do wtoom Otstrilwto► 1-99 to Nsc. Blvd. Major *Waft 36.l00 /T-MI 3.NT 5.027 /.775 02 07 Oo+wtoan Distributor fi1ght of try 20.300 /3416 02 tOmotow. Dlstrliwtor Wool Ave. to Sf t Ave. Mejer swam 21240 /3-M 02 02 02 02 02 02 Oomtom OlatrOwtor 04poaf Plana Surface Street improvements $,t01 Wn Brickell Bridge Over Mae$ River 9-1e. replacer- 9,763 W" 3" SIT /IS - meet 02 . 02 fgort of Plael Bridge Dodge is to else. Blvd. 6-1e. blob level 5,4" INS -Os 02 Fort of Meet Bridge Dodge Is to 01sc. Blvd. 6-1n. blob level 28,073 06-/7 03 03 03 SW Nd Aavem w Bridge Mar Wool River Repimca/aldee 600 /6-06 02 02 02 t t41A1 tOS.276 d.07S S.Se1 1.01! t Sea Pert Ill IJ74166 letter from FOOT. ' 2 A (sir Mara Is eat asessed for programmed Improvements too" In the carreat fiscal tar. 3 tb project traffic assigned to rate Ilsh. S01/ICI t AOi1, SWC qt BIV Office Towr lrleklll.e•y. �. Off Ice Tower • OrIckell Kay Phase ' Brickeil Key Fhas• 11 BrIck•ll Kay /has• 11.1 1221 Orlakell L One /ricked Sgwro Tap MrlekelI TOW Lincoln Toners Erlekoll Station Tow a SaAheast Financ Center > Riverpare M tvl ultrowl mail Mat►o-0•de Admin �t t ld tn0 Cantrust Tower • wsaule Toes;r :mks TAM 14 maim C0IMIrm 09MORIPTS scale LOW I u� (OF-A..CIUSI BrIckeII Ave i OffIce 1!0.000 SE 11 th Street south Bayshore i Off Ice 316.000 i. SE 1111,11 Street Clooghtdn Islw4 Rssid•ntlol/ 300 0u/ Off fee 111.000 Clauphten Island Mesldantlal 334 Ou Clem""" Island Residential 410 Ou Orickell Avenue i Office/ 410.000/ SE 12th Street Retail 10.000 - OrICkell Avenue i Off lea/ 443.000/ St I" Street Rate 11 t2.000 Nickell Avenue i Of flew/ 443.000/ SE Mt1 Street Metal 12.000 Erleksll Avenue i Office/ _ 737.d00/ SE 7" Street Met811 12.000 SIN 1st Avenue i Office/ 20000O/ Sw Bth Street Metal1 16.000 181 •tscoyne Blvd. li Office/ 1.150.000/ SE &4 .Street Metal1, 16.000 SE 1 Avenue i Mptei 129 Suites SE oit Street St 1st Avenue i Meta11 93.000 st 1st Street • W 2nd Avenue ; 0ovt• Office/ 600.OP0/ No 2" Street Metal 40.000 } st Ist Avenue i Office/ 941p.000/ K 2nd Street Rafe lI 26.300 _ k. 11140 Zed Avenue i Off lee/ 262.000/ wo Flaiiier St. Plaza 6.000 N Clove l d• spy l s i ty ®ayf rout Perk i spec. Rat e l I M4 o s00 CMMK ME Oft Street City Administration W bW Avenue i Oovt. Office 316 400 - Wilding 11 W 3rd Street ,F Flaride Regional Hit 2w Avenue i 6dat. Office 169.000 Service Center 11 10 SM Street .• freedom Tover Al eta Blecovne Blvd. i Mixed u•a Ji f= HE 61h Street 5 NW%. est Over+oan/ Hot bid Avenue i c4Nwc f s l / 290.000/ Fork hest HM 9fri street Reatdentlet 1,I13O 0ti ph•ea 1 Courthouse $4uaro Hq 1st Avenue i Office/ 231,000/ ►sit bw Street Retail ti 000 SOLOit t AOA .31 y' ate;.. . --. ...-: ::• '.:. r::". .. .,:. -:. ... • ._. .. ... .a. .. ,r.„>�c.v. t F 4. Proleet Traffic Impacts a. Trio Genera ton 4: Project +raffle was projected based on trip generation ' Was derived from +49 "1-95 Down+own Distributor, Design -4r Traffic Forecasts." According to the report, the trip generation rates were standard ITE Was with adjustments rk made to reflect trip making in the urban sot+ing a+ various times of day. These trip generation Was area shown in Table 15. as`" !t TMLL is ;�z TRIP 00 Qj1111R11T10N RATIS Titr of Off lee 1000 S.F. WA 3.387 3.146 17.34 j RNetI 1000 S.F. WA 6.3" 9.000 99.96 .. c MitNi w00A 1.439 1.567 20.40 .'Y'-. a tttMb. 1000 S.F. WA 3.72s 9.12s ".00 K OOM01 0.826 1.082 12.42 W. Vol+ 10111l V t Ad► b. Projeet Traffic Proloctlons The addition of 1994 project traffic to the prograiaamop.. roadway ne+work would result in no additional roadway segments failing below LOS "D". it shouIa be notea, however, that the projeetts +raffle assignmonts as well as 1964 roadway levels of service are subs+antlally based on 32 A, iyn �a:sE4 m ,€�._ s _�t_ �....�:�..m.=...v,...____•.�,�..t..,.....�.s..� ,�...�,.��.,..,.0 .l_ .. A�.tr,: `:.r. -�v-� b_.��s�'�4�s t� �1 mess transit (as previously discussed) as well as a modified version of the programmed Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Remp system. This modified design is discusses in greater detail in Section S, Additional improvements Needed. Table 16 shows the Cumulative effects of 199A background, COmmitted development, and project traffic on the programmed and modified road network, and Tables 17 and 18 show the levels of service on roadway segments for each of these impacts. TAIL[ 16 CUKILATI%t fRA1dP UTION IMPACTS y: lope is Projee+w t0 ooerete MIow LOS 000 (13 To+al) ibreleGwen+ hoeefs MwOsr of Ss�ents hreoef o+ Totsi to isf (" Ne+"Wlt S 3A 1So• eeCwOrO1M10 0 0 11M BWkq"W4 ens 4 31 Ces*t++ee Owelop.a+t low seek6roW4, Corw(+tee .. 31 W nt iXISfln0 MIMI Ceer - Treftte I M onkgr&J". Cowl++e0 _, " eta ►row"a MIe01 Center Treff le i'- Mt=t AM, irRPC S. Aaditional Improvements Needed to Accowasodeft Project IMpects Mbjor portions of the transportation plan assigned to offset the anticIpatea impacts and traffic flow$ of the entire Miami Center project are based on modifications to FDOT's current assign of the Downtown Distributor System Bifurcated Ramps. As these Improvements have yet to be approved by t.,,e Florioa 33 i..0 .km • :+ky..• .. dew :.. �,, ,5-�. -.,fi ..... ..., :,.,.. - . -... ,. .r,.... ,.. .3. .. 1 _ - - IJI �A rASLE 17 C11011AAr11E 111191 PFPX HM UNF IC NSS 1915 1994 1994 Mims Pinter Ex QrcLiyroiwA Paroll Existing 1.05 p `�ipo� ski >' From rs Olreetloo Leoes tes Los pistol" tilvd. WE 9th Street NE 916 Street N 9 A A A A A S 3 C A C C C Ifs W int AV~ it HE 9th Street IE Mb Street N 3 A A A A A a IE Nd Avenue (1) HE list Street 1E 12th Street S 3 E C F F F Sir lot Street (2) SN tst AV~ M1/e1 Arrwe E 3 C • C C C SE 2nd Street SE Ist Aeeeue tllrel Avenue M 2 A A A A A Distributor SE 2nd AV~ Exit Rssg E 4 C A A A A It t 51 Extra ce Reap k 2 A A A A A ortckell Avenue SE 13th Street SE Wh Street N 2 F C E E E S 2 A A A A A !lrickell Avenue River bridge N 2 p A A A A S 2 C A • • • Sir 2nd Avenue 431 River Bridge, N 1 F • o C. A A A A Hied Avenue River •ridge N 3 M/A A A A A S 3 A A A A Sit !iA Street SM 2od Aveiaw, Sil 3r4 AssArs E 3 E • F F F. -.. SE •th Street SE 1st Areoso •►kbelt E d A A A A A C: SE 7th Street 4tcooll Wool Arsws M- 2 A A A A A Sams Am, SFRlC x I• Ii v. �i n. - TAflLE l• OMLAi11E Im Fix MR TRAFFIC IM INS 1994 19% 1994 MIMI center • Existing oackwomd' Committed ExIsfifts rope Ob O,�iY Frame to Direction tows L85 L4K lO5 Los Los Blscorm Blvd. /E oth Street NE Sib Street M 1 A A A B e• s S f B A C c c • ME let Avenue 111 HE 9ttti Street NE loth Street N 3 E C F F F 1E ?tld Avenue (0) ME lost Street IE 12tA Street S 3 A A A A A S01 let Street (2) SW lot Avenue Niel Avenue E 3 c e• 0 0 D SE bx1 Street SE 1st Avenue MIMI Avenue M 2 a A Distributor SE tad Avenue Exit Reap E 1 A A A A A GI O 3! Entrance poop M 2 t! A A A A BrickelI Avenue SE 13th Street SE 1Oth Street N 2 A A A A A S 2 E e 0 D 0 _ Brlckell Avenue Rider Bridge N 2 c A 9 c c S 2 C A A A 0 SW 2nd Avenue (3) River Bridge M 1 A A A A A S 1 A A c c 0 k Mind Avenue Rarer 11rldge is 3 M/A A A A A S 3 A A A A Sit sib Street Sb1 ltnd Avenas SM kd Avettos ' E ! A A A A A SE elk Street SE 1st AV~ Brlcholl E 1 A A A A A SE 7tb Street Brichell MIMI Avenra M 2 c A B t! tt �1. SOtWs AM, SFW - �t - k D*psrftent of Transportation, it is Important to note that if these mW Mentions are not incorporated into an already planned and programmed transportation improvement, then many of t` the traffic assignments and projected 1994 levels of service for roadway segments in the impact area will not hold true. The tmprovene0s; as discussed by the Dupont Plaza task force" are shown in Tab Ia 19. In addition to these improvements, the Applicant proposes: (1) conversion of a portion of the eastbound bifurcated ramp from embankment and retaining wall to additional structure length to allow passenger car and van ' clearance for access to the local service roadway, (2) the Biscayne Boulevard May south side service road, and (3) minor geouetric improvements at the SF Znd Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard May intersection. No extension to the eastbound bifurcated ramp is proposed. The proposed aodiftcations are shorn In Figure S. Table 20 lists the effects of the project ani.Improvements on crtftcal intersectfons within the traffic law+ area. 'F + The Dupont Plaza task force is an advisory group conslstlog of embers of local government, the Metropoi itan Planning Organization, and Florida Department of Transportation. 36 j� .. C --•-• Er MODIFICATIONS TO THE DOWNTOWN DISTRIBUTOR • BIFURCATED SHOMNG THE 3 ADOW APPUCANT FECOWOMW IMMOWMEWS prepared for the Downtown Development Authority staff. Table 21-Ilsts the fl4ree Applicant -proposed improvements needed to accamtodate project impacts. their cost and the Appiicant's fair share. TNL[ 21 r A�iT10IM� Irl01�MpiTs TO M OOt11R'OYM OtffRltUlOR e1tNIGITiD N;-2 zq� OIII' 1" M MUM TO 1CCO0='M iMJW IWWU #"I Ica" Fell, r5 Y zf f3MNtstep Of AM f �0.000 f so•000 eyM111U�Rf >r - - . stay . - lMvIN ANr !l.ODO !S•000 !+:yye, ... - 1 �� i1Jt/.ODO "See D0 euc/ Nw. V" Consideration of the timingoof needed improvene0s t0 the exlsting roadway n0work is CMPIIcetdd in this lnstance due to two factors. The first relates to the design of the programmes Oom+own Distributor Bifurcated Ramp system. Wh i 1 e the Flor lna Depar+metnt of Transportation has been proceeding with a final design, the FDOT design (see Figure, 6) does not Include the 11. f•1VJW 6 CU F14M FDOT DESIGN FOR THE DOVW O h N DISlFgBUTOR ENFURCATED RAND' SYSTEM p t i h: a�daoa III PLAZA o11 1/1 SE y2!D ST. 1 �► o • � � . fit _r �.r�—M w ''' I I • 1 e R� /P .• / • lTAlA 111 ` 5011111TASt TIwi1C1At IXMTEN � I GARAGE AIM KIA11 BAST T11M/CIAt • Urt1E11OWD SE t / • .. . 11. 000, 4 fill of �71 Gi SOLIM FDK WApC i'�I modifications discussed by the Dupont Plaza task force or those contained in the Appltcant's proposed design. The second relates to the timing of the ramp construction. Originally, ' the project was scheduled for the current fiscal year. Due to federal cu+becks and other circumstances FDOT now projects the .completion for 1988. However, I+ remains uncertain whether the timing of the completion of the ramps will be coincident with +he Applicant's proposed project phasing. Under normal circumstances, encountering a situation such as this one would result In a recommendation for project dental and staff wou l d �u • have requested the+ the Applicant voluntarily delay Council's consideration pending resolution of +here major problems. Fbrwor, working with the City, FDOT and the developer three things are apparent: 1) that most Of these problems can be resolved in the near future; 2) the project is economically ti important to the region; and 3) +he developer's time is constrained regarding project financing. Therefore, staff has agreed, at the Applicant's request, to address approval of interim phasing of the proposed project lndopend*n+ of design or coincidence with the Bifurcated Ramp system. In order to both accurately assess the impacts caused by interim phases of the project (in +he absence of the bifurcated ramps) and +o ' recommend adequa+e mitigettor+ of +hose impacts, the surface street network, along with the preliminary surface *+root ! improvements suggested by +he City of Miami's Public Works Y a.. _- ' j „ l P ... ,R .. ,;- ,. ist.`;i. � + _ 'srt'. 1 ,� :, -nt.h t Y �' Y '.,n , -�``�i�r•a ___ Department, was examined for the year 1991. The year 1991 was chosen because It reflects the most probable year of occupancy for Phase 1. The examination was based on the following assumptions: 1) only one of the Applicant's.two proposed structures would be constructed, 2) the Bifurcated Ramp system would not be In place, 3) some form of Interim improvements to SE Second Avenue and project entrance areas would be undertaken by the Developer, 4) no additional development in the 3 block area directly west of the proposed project site would +eke k place in the absence of the bifurcated ramps, and S) some form r: of intersection Improvement would be performed along SE 2nd Street. Unknowns In our analysis are the precise interim improvements needed to ensure adequate levels of service, prior, fro the devolopment and construction of the bifurcated ramp f ff ra •; system. These particulars are still in the planning g phases, n' and final improvements and costs ere to be determined by the City of Miami. However, these are primarily local roadways and a preliminary list of possible Improvements, as determined by the City's Department of Public Works, includes: A., Duce+- l�aza improvements i. SE 2nd Avenue and SE 3rd Street Adjust west curb on public land on southbound approach and adjust traffic signal heads as rewiredo to create four versus present three southbound 43 k; 40 . through lanes. Lane drop to be easily seea+mmodeted south of interseetion within existing pevem+ent through left turn at Biscayne Boulevard key prior to Brickell Avenue bridge approach. Modify signing and striping throughout section as required. 2. SE 2nd Avenue and SE 2nd Street Ad Just channelizatlon curbing in southeast corner to provide two westbound through lanes and three separate left turn lanes• plus one free flow Ieft turn lane inside modified channelizetion island. Two - of the left turn lanes for access to 1-95 entrance - ramp near SE 2nd Avenue and SE 3rd Street, one f eandvtory and one optional. AdJustment of channelization island in southeast corner fo also allow three southbound through lams, transitioned through intersection wlth skip qu1de lines. (One mandatory right turn fene and two through Ianas currently In place.) Revise signal head displays, pedestrian features,. overhead and other signing, and pavement markings as require0. 44 F } XI r l±i :...53 {` e, . Biscayne Plaza Project Entrance Entrance and exit drives t0 be coordinated with ultimate bifurcated ramp design and City of Miami Public Works Department. Geometric alterations at project drives near Biscayne Boulevard May and Biscayne Boulevard Way. This Is to y' include revised drainage as necessary, outside r .: pavement widening within existing right of way, r signalizetion of exit drive to be Installed when warranted, and revised pavement markings. Also provide custom material and construction for approximately 1,200 feet of sidewalks along project street frontage and riverwalk frontage, and all seating, lighting, and landscaping, all for public f_ use. tfq r, a. Biscayne Boulevard May Access Roadway City to preserve present public right of way for separate 181 eastbound access roadway south of Biscayne Boulevard May to extend from SE 3rd Avenue t0 Biscayne Piaza project south vehicular trtffiG entrance. Preservation to extend at least to date of completion Of project Phase 2. (Separate access roadway not deemed necessary to project Phase 1.) t 45 t t . SE 2nd Street_ between South Miami Avenue and SE 1st Avenue, City seeks approximately five feet of additional ` right of way within this block that is necessary to Create three westbound lanes, an addition of one 's travel lane. At the Miami Avenue intarsectton, this im ovement would allow a separate left turn lane, a Pr - k separate through lane, and a separate lane used as a combination through and slant right to the 1-95 p entrance ramp. 2 2. SE 2nd Street between SE 1st Avenue and SE 2nd `. Avenue s� Mester roadway plan calls for three travel lanes within this section of SE 2nd Street, to be f, �. constructed•wtthin existing public right of way. (Two travel lanes presently provided.) The projected levels of service for street segments in +tie downtown area for 1991 will still operate below LOS "0" even x with the proposed interim project impacts and improvmneos. However, these 1991 LOSS do represent an improvement over tht z LOSS currently experienced in the area. What may be more indicative of the health of the transportation system in this AQ.- . r=. - .�.r. dose, ere the levels of service on intersections in the area as shown in Table 22. Critical intersections in the immediate area will operate at an acceptable LOS with interim phasinc of the project, independent of the bifurcated ramps, provided tnat Interim improvements are made to the surface street network. TNU n . H11 MITICk 10110 1.110 S •ITil01R •IP1MM PAP STS M 111ttt 1~10 PhM Ot P►elee* V1+ftW P,eJeCt WM40 }`. . K 1NrtreMw�f Itq►NM�*!f ly►wrMll�s E IMMMe�1ee OS L et— fi.,, �� K 3M A". eM 2" St. W • A PM t P 0 y ft iN Aw. Wd 3re St. 10 0 t 0 PM C o • - 1` Are1 eM elw"IM C live. W" ... a 3" A". ON 2M St. All • C PM P It 0 St 3M Avg. eM 3tti St. AM t t A P11 A A A ft 3tt Are. eM il�csyue AM • C C C •IN. N" PM C C - tlaterlte tlN./PreJeCt Alt M/A • . O►I+re PM M/A • OF d. Perkin - The existing structure contains 1,150 covered parking spaces. The proposed additions to the project wi I 1 provide approximately 1,200 covered parking spaces. All will be a`V w located out of sight inside the building base on floors 3-10. Parking access will be via internal floor ramps and a four long 't7 VV t x`i y?i �'i N c� FYfr • BAMADW PARK / N PLAZA STATION lilt sounl���r � i • /IM�NCI{L • � 6iMTt11 � ' 444 i . t � t minimized In order to ensure that adequate levels of green time can be achieved for the surface street network. While second story pedestrian walkways (as originally proposed In the area) would be preferable, internal 'walkways within the Miami Center area should be adequate to min ins i z• the impact of grade level crossings. _ Y., •- l s Jr s .�: �� � 1 .. { zip_ c t ,•S. � t `.�-7% ��"i 1 i.; rt PART I1I •.COMMENTS FROM OTHER AGENCIES X This section contains letters received from o+4er agencies on the Miami fix% 'a Center I Amended ADA. ;.t a s 11_ 3 4 46 Fl ?4 t y p x �1� SA nz ( Jr d.i ` _ y [ rya 3 - • 0 I 7= L y M t jhH 3 1 � �lf ,t :- A'.:7'4�.f.z ;'�.!1�7'{�?�.C. SYE•: ?.%': f' 'Y+. I .-.i'�'v'.iPb i-. }:'3_i� ,' 1�.s�i`LY'.4s R•--•�` �.j..rr f:*�.ti.u?t2(� _ —__ L�d.S h-'�1 4+'����_e_Y. A..�5 �?.._... ,,,t, 3c Ana Duster South Florida Regional Planning Council January 24, 1986 Page 2 Aaaunt F.Y. of MPA Item No. Description Type Funds 1 000's Comm 6113307 Downtown Distributor • Interstate 4-R Bifurcated Ramps Construction $339600* 87/8 6113375 Bifurcated Ramps Interstate 4-R Right -of -Way 20,300 85/6 6113376 Bifurcated Ramps Local Funds 29300* 87/8 Local Streets Construction TOTAL $56,200 *The Department fs currently reviewing the construction cost estimates. The unexpected requirement to acquire right-of-way has increased the public cost to.construct the project by -an estimated 20 million dollars. Funds for interstate'improvement projects of this type are prioritized on a state- wide basis. Longstanding commitments to projects in other areas may impact funding availability for this project. In addition, the Gramm-Rudman Act and the pending renewal of the Highway Act adds uncertainty as to the level of federal funding in the future. The Department's update of its Five -Year Transportation Plan is currently under�ray. It is our intent to modify the schedule and costs of this project in our Five -Year Transportation Plan, and submit the modified plan for the annual update of the TIP. Both the Department's Five -Year Transportation _ Plan and the MIP0's TIP will be sdopted in June. The Department has already submitted a list of `proposed changes to the Transportation Planning Council of -the WO which included the modification of the Bifurcated Ramp Project's schedule and costs. If necessary, the Department will take action to formally amend the TIP y-< at .this time. Regardless of this, it is impossible for the Department Ito proceed,with construction of this project without the needed; right-of-way. i. Sincerely, r; t Thomas L. Thomson d: District Director Planning and Programs TLT:en cc: Jose -Luis Mesa z,.. John Taylor 33 �r "e — -ansp&tation Florida ��� ; Department of MJWJ !BOZAl SUNice center ILA, w ..s.VAWMIs _ c2.4 %-,& con .slew T S.F.R. P. C. s M-0I W1%I /111Y RGb1./1`Lrl (nfU1ANv1G1I a 09V (2 L f� g 1985 The Capkal, Tallahassee.•Florida 323014MO (904) 48& 1480 ' August 7, 1985 In Reply Refer to: Mike Wisenbaker Historic Sites Specialist t (904) 497-2333 Mr. wry Peterson r "South Florida Regional Planning Council T. 3440 Hollywood'Soulevard, Suite 140 Hollywood, Florida 33021 u RE: Letter of July ll, 1985 from Ethan Minsky Cultural Resource Assessment Request Amended ADA for the Miami Center DRI, Dade County, Florida v Dear Mr. Peterson: In our review of this project we noted a discrepancy between what is stated as the answer to Question 19B in the above cited document and what was recommended in the letters included in the appendix (on pages 19.A.1-1 and 19.A.2). Whereas the answer to: Question 198. indicates in the event any "underground archaeological resources are uncovered during excavations, a qualified archaeologist will be requested to examine them as required by law," the -letters from the Dade County Historic Survey and from the Florida Division of Archives and History, on the other hand, explicitly state that "an archaeologist should be present during the earliest phases of subsurface excavation of the most extreme western portion of the Hall Point tract to determine if such archaeological data exists beneath the fill. The presence of an archaeologist (to monitor) construction activities in this specific area of the project would insure that significant data, artifacts and features would be recognixed,.recorded and possibly recovered before their destruction". It remains the recommendation of this office, that unless this area is preserved as green space, that a professional archaeologist be present in order to observe ground disturbing activities in the western portion of the Ball Point tract in the event cultural resources may be present. 55 56 AVOW 7 , x �xigh� i :.. .._ _.� r• . H t--: � � e .,...�._.s,.._..•-,+.� �' _: �+�x?�.'..« _�-�'F+L�'s k5'�c^���� � �� _- +3,`^'Shin:.���'E;s.S'`.�'�'�'�.$,�l:aca°.vE,-:. ,yc•,:ti. t,..,.. _ - — � R XAwtO L. SYAA`i AN, ftOO A 33933-0+04 ,wrow sei • s» • oeo December 13, 1985 Mr. Russell, D. L. Wirth, Jr. Mirth b Company $20 Rrickell Key Drive AN $1 Suits 1204 1�6 Miami, Florida 33131 Dear Mr. Wirth: Wirth i Company and its development team are to be congratulated for your confidence in Miami and the private initiative you have -takin in the development of Biscayne Plaza, a $400 million mixed- nat`eo"lex which will be a world class Miami landmark and the largest ifs our downtown, located at the mouth of the !Miami River �,. ia;the'heart of the city. Your willingness to collaborate elossly with City officials has made our job of review much ' easier and will, I am sure, result in an extremely valuable addition to this great international city. i�City of Miami has always worked closely with the business and *velopsmat eaimunity in furthering the development of downtown Zn the past ten years, we have seen over 87 new public afsd'privats projects built worth in excess of $3 billion. Biscayne Plaza will be an excellent addition, bringing both world -class quality and employment to our city. x In reviewing your project, we note several elements which are of 'particular benefit to the citizens of Miami. First, Wirth a ' Company's concept of mixed -use (residential and retail as well as 4 office space) will create a dynamic 'urban village" and active people -place in the heart of downtown. Second, the iaywalk promenade, which you will build with private funds. and will open for public use, will link Sayfront Park and the Rouse Zlayside Project to our Conference and Convention Center on the Miami River with h beautiful walkway, restaurants and cafes lining your project. Third, the scale and world -class quality of your development will make it a Miami landmark and potential rival to r Rockefeller Center in New York. Fourth, and certainly not least, will be the 3,500 direct and indirect construction jobs, and 10,000 j project will generate, permanent office tenant jobs, this as well as added tax revenues for our city and neighborhood needs. Finally, for two years now, Wirth L Company has committed F; its private capital 100% at risk to this city -building effort and will attract $400 million of additional private institutional x funds, all without seeking public financing, public subsidy or Public assistance other than reasonable approvals; an excellent example of -what private initiative can do with City encouragement. 7 57 1 v t T t 'q"s1'F f A METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE COUNTY MANAUGn DEVELOPMENTAL IMPACT COMMITTEE METMOADE CENTER III N.W. FIRST STREET SUITE 1210 SARAC, MIAMI, FLORIO ME" A 33128-1973 (305) 3752657 AUG 1-9 IM ALIgust 15, 1985 Mr. Ethan Minsky 300 FAami Center 100 Chapin PlazaMiami, Florida 33131 CAM RE: Mini Center 1 - Compliance to the Bis Bey St=eUm Dvalopmt Review Ordinance 6-14 Dow It. Minsky: to M" letter is in reference ject kwwn Miami Canter I and Y= pro bow it gill be affected Dade County Ordinance 85.14 (&=*line Davelopcont Review) Raso 257-85 Dmlcp=t Rc4w and (Shoreline t Himal). Ibis ed by the C=111ty Cmcdssim in an. effort I andf= dew opizent standards regardliess of jtarisdictianal to La In addition to the standards safmth, a review comi:dttm has begs sash ut&lUh" Which is charged with the responsibility of undnira &2 A a"— prnjeet within the review b=&ry and a WWI as =Lfq= to the and Intent. of the twelme, before my final DRI action is taken, the requirements "tfwch In the legis4tim mast be satisfied. To assist y(ij in this PTOC"s, I bava encumed -a copy of the above ImentiorAd doexents. If this office can be of any assistwm please don't hesitate to call. Sincerely, David J. Sadth, C=rdinator Shoreline Developnnt Review C=Ittee WS/jZ EnClos=" Barney Pete: sae, AICP, %"M Sergio Rodriguez. Director City of MiWi Planning- I*pt. 59, 1 E T-' A- t The current status of the development, as approved and as built, is described as follows: Condition I Component As Approved As Built Phase I Office Tower 8050400 GSF 791,000 GSF Retail 85,000 GSF 96.297 GSF Hotel (630 units) (634 units) 6580400 GSF 689,000 GSF .Parking Spaces 1670 sp. 1145 sp.* Phase ii Residential SOO un I ts :6* Not constructed - Parking Spaces 696 $p. 2,365 sp Floor Area Ratio (not).6.36 4.27 Lot, Coverage 83S Undetermined Ground Usable Opcti 17% Phase 11 not Pedestrian Open 16% constructed Space at Main Floor IF. j --Level *1145 regular spaces can accommodate 1485 valet patting spaces. **Reduced to 324 units: letter from Mr. Gould Janua0y 21, 1983, w 7; Afl Page I of S' '7L" T" Comments are as follows: a. The developer may .delete a portion of the project e.g., Phase 2 residential units and related parking. The Development Order limits the project, but does not require that all parts be built. A similar situation pertains to conditional use approval. b. There is a difference between the amount of parking a) proffered by the developer and approved by the Commission and b) actually provided for the office building and hotel. The Development Order "limited" the project to no more than 2365 parking spaces and did not make the 2365 spaces a requirement; the develpper may have intended to make up the shortfall of 525 spaces (1670-1145) elsewhere on the site and the developer -proceeded under a valid building permit issued by the City for existing Miami Center 1. c. Recent information provided by the developer shows that the area for retail and hotel may have been exceeded in existing Miami Center I, necessitating an "after -the -fact" amendment to the Development Order. The current status of the remaining conditions and compliance thereto is ; described as follows: Conditions Developer Compliance ?r 2. Project considerations: Compliance prior to issuance of riverwalk amenities building permit for Phase I; Phase --facade treatment 2 unresolved. --bay and river views --podium landscaping 3. Riverwalk and Baywalk: Partial compliance: baywalk (Phase amenities, easement, dedication, 1) easement recorded by Resolution construction and maintenance. 83-129; February 10, 1983. The construction of the baywalk.surface has been completed but there is no landscaping, benches or street furniture or lighting. A $5000000 performance bond to guarantee construction of the riverwalk (Phase 2) has expired. Riverwalk easement is being held in escrow by the City Clerk, per Resolution r 83-130; , February 10, 1983, to be recorded when construction is completed or by the year 1990, whichever cues first. ;hopin Plata .(east end) land- Icap#1 treotment. 62 Partial compliance: concrete -.sub- base installed; landscapim travertine surface and barorier guardrail not installed. The Department of Public Yorks installed a barrier'as interim safety measurt.' S. upper level pedestrian connec- tion to 0CM station in Biscayne Boulevard. 6. Consider upper level pedestrian connection between Miami Center Iand II S. funding traffic improvements adjacent to site: -four traffic lanes on Biscayne Boulevard from south • end to SE 2nd Street and necessary dedication. -removal of traffic island near SE 3 Street. -provision of traffic signal at SE 3 Street. 63 The Bayfront ..rk Corps of Engineers project covers the same area, so the travertine surface; landscaping and traffic barriers (i f required) should be installed upon completion of the Corps of Engineers project. No compliance; the City judges. that DCM station was constructed in the "vicinity" of Biscayne Boulevard and S.E. 2nd and 3rd Streets. The current owners of existing Miami Center I judge that this requirement is not now feasible because of the station shift of location. Compliance unenforceable. Condition is to 'consider" not to "require". A stronger requirement in Miami Center II Development r er has expired. Condition superseded. Dade County Department of Traffic and Transpor- tation letter of April 28, 1979 (Attachment A) accepted developer Alternate IV which provided a) reversal of two eastbound lanes on existing SE 3rd Street with forced left at SE 2nd Avenue plus an additional westbound thru lane on SE 3rd Street from SE 2nd to S. E. 3rd Avenue and geometric alterations to the 1-95 distributor ramp; b) extension of one southbound lane on Biscayne Boulevard between SE 2nd to 3rd Street and c) a restricted left on SE 3 Avenue at SE 3 Street. The developer subsequently maintained that these interim improvements conflicted with and were superseded, by plans for the 146 bifurcated ramps and the associated. local street system. Partial compliance: $52,000 credit for Biscayne Boulevard work. Two other improvements were accomplished by others: the traffic island in Biscayne Boulevard near SE 3rd Street was removed by the Dade County Transportation Administration (DCTA) for the O"town Component of Metrorai1 and repaved by Southeast Bank, and the 2nd left turn lane northbound from Biscayne Boulevard to SE 2nd Street was cleared by the DCTA and constructed by Southeast Bank. The owners of existing Miami r -addition of 2nd left turn lane Center I have offered to provide the northbound onto SE 2nd Streeto traffic signal at SE 3rd Street. Note that the Miami Center II Development Order (now expired) by • reference, apportioned $481,598 (in 1980 dollars) in surface street improvements to Miami Center I (see Attachment 8). The $52,000 credit refers to line 7 of Attachment B. Note the interplay of Conditions 6 and 7: the developer successfully argued that Condition 6 was superseded by subsequent plans for the I.95 bifurcated ramps and associated local street system and } then the developer was relieved of S481$98 (462,000 noted above) in t �< associated local street system �., improvements allocated to Miami Center I. as specified in the Miami Center II Development Order, when that Development Order expired. 9. Dedication of land, equivalent No compliance, but owners of exist. tothe 'extension of Biscayne ing Miami Center I have offered the �:. Boulevard southerly to Miami dedication. River to City for public pur. poses. - 10. Chopin Plaza parking provisions Partial compliance. The Public Works Department and Department of Off Street Parking approved plans and completed final inspection of Construction of the parking area only, except the travertine surface remains to be placed an the sidewalk an the north side of Chopin Plaza. 11. Provision of parking spaces for Phase 2 condominiums not constructed. condominiums equivalent to Dade The developer's original proposal was County toning Code. 695 parking spaces for '00 condominium units. The Dade County F;. Department of Traffic and Transportation- (Attachment A) cited 860 parking spaces for 500 condominium units. ' Y. The developer, by letter of January 21. 1983 stated his intention of constructing 324 condominium units would the meet COTT recommendations `. 64 s -r; 77 ,. - 01 ' 12. Analysis of =eaw impact an Compliance: ilysis by E.S. Iverson Marine Communities. Biologist, University of Miami Rosenstiel School, dated June 13, ' 1979, supplied to the City by letter of May 16, 1985. However, information supplied. by the developer to the South Florida Regional Planning Council on August 8, 1985 indicates that the seawall- bulkhead modifications have been ' completed necessitating an "after- the -fact° permit.:_ 13. Notice to Dade County Historic Compliance Survey of project start. 14. Complex source permit. Superseded: issuance of complex source permits by State his been `a suspended. - a 15. Construction commencement in Compliance v two years (May 24, 1981). µ 16. Submission of a complete n- Compliance 4, Application for Development Approval. ' 1 f f 65 r a III GENERAL PROJECT RELATED INFORMATION The Miami Center I DRI is an already existing and proposed office complex located on a 8.46 acre site in downtown Miami next to Biscayne Bay, Be front Park, and Dupont Plata on the east side of Biscayne Boulevard (see Exhibit 1). Phase I of the project, known as The Mini Center Existing, is already developed the on northern 5.45 acres of the site and consists of the Edward Ball Office Buildin (791,000 sq. ft. of office space plus 14,750 sq. ft. of retail space), %go 634-room Pavillion - Hotel, the Podim which contains 75 000 sq• ft. of retail space plus $00 parking spaces, and a 300-space office parking structure. Phases II and IN* scheduled to be built in 1987.69 and 1990.91 respectively, are known as Biscayne Plaza Phase 1 and Biscayne Plaza Phase 2 and will be located on the southern 3.01 acres of {:. the site. The Biscayne Plaza Phase 1 office tower will include 60 dwelling units, 700,000 sq. ft. of office uses, and-160,000 sq. ft. of retail uses M and adds 1,200 arksnngg spaces to the Podium Parking Garage. The Phase 2 office town will include 90 dwelling units, 780,000 sq. ft. of office uses. and $09000 sq. ft. of retail uses. Exhibit 2 shows the Master Site Plan for the total Miami Center I project. o I e At present the site is toned CBD-1 (Central Business District). The. proposed uses are consistent with both the toning and Comprehensive Plan designations. } r This review has been performed by South Florida Mater Management District to, - provide the South Florida Regional Planning: Council with a re�ional assessment of witer•relmted impacts of this project fray the 0istrict•s perspective. This { assessment 1s not a permit under Chapter 373, F.S., nor is it a guarantee for said permits. x _ 67 • A'ihf z,.c'....di.C.,,.J. r l.tl ,.:. 1 .,. :_-., '.:i ...':: ', ': <_., .. ":. h - _ _ 1 t.:! a S'a 1-�a ✓aei ih-nr _ A.\, -'•S Proposed Pota5le waterSource: sewer Authority Miami gade Water ana Permit 0: 13-00017 (Alexander Orr/Snapper Creek) Permitted Allocation: 130 MGO Current Usuage: 131.522 MGO.(1) Expiration Date: 12-13-86 Projected Owand: 0.165 MGO Proposed Non -Potable Water Source: N/A , :`. Projected Oemand: -0- r AT PERMIT TIME pPr : �" :UNR St V 0: I meted Oe+�an s }; Potable es anti ai ; Commerci x ` r rates egn �E x a ratio :. 2. onserva- on: Practices C 1i a with a a e taw X . r, rates a.n - He"rva : " rate o a ca nn ra ce on r an an s #.as Jim n R II urce Av i1 ilit Y=' A. -s e o e and/or Non- table . n • NA ; ; .: a. a • C w r ources c. a r re- e avers o mos - . i (See footnote on page 6) 69 �N dl_ . RESOLVABLE :AT PRMTTIME 11 ter u 1 v l o nt ont' :RESOLVED: � : UNR SO V n w a• utpump locations ad)exi tt an os • i N A ' Ex sting/proposto dr owns N A C. upp y eve oilmen (p asi blending of s s i MIA • t ns 3. yets i uanlit N A >nor _(Duality MOST users : v n are a anger :' ies ILA Rare om4ft2orm. its habitat N A rayIne water Intrusion . un wa er surface miter r" . Wer 0041as • eMIA e• G014taml nati o o I I urron Sources. NA -site on xi ti o ed N A r' - exists N A 4. SO CrODOSM 00tiOn e r va a - snortera rm - : : ona use : { • w es n ca a a• en Of er com eiants relative_ to • : : : : v RESOLVABLE AT P RM T Till Water Dev looment ont'd iR S0 V: :UNRESOLVED • apac ty for ruture Mansion X 1 11 esoures c a "Pit a ■proven y closbility r S r'ropulation-1proUt—ttions co oraved s rvice are 3. Sulabilitv o or000sed option: .. a ravailability r rw a • Lop term Bona e• n c a use " (1) At presint there is an Iication in- f ipp house for a modification to this T permit which would increase its allocation sufficiently to service this Project. „ /1 y. SUBJECT: WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT NIMI CENTER I DRI 95-206 A, 11,jewand WISD : X AVjrj21 d1i II III On- It dis sal Ao,olat on ows NA ation 8 ponds RIA r4a.... oc,z,,. of retention/detention areas aratiol of SO system ffra wastewater disposal Mint"I : N4A lo" Mfewalfr rouse : is MUM,or was tawaxer rouse eater recharge; lake : 01% etc.) : N/A LA se go Potential tar laverimpacts: & -- -1 A a .- & — - - - A A & - - . - - IV Z� C. 72 ,, ... Lq - -WINNn . .y I wetlands f A < uan it acres -Y 8ua ex s n con on : C. u er 3; II Sensitive lands N A n er s ties d a a • n C. er Pave nr versa aquifer Y • amph-re. arliti ltC.) X - III ftesery4tion iti ation NA Man : N/A 1, n ant nt d radation elevations, buffers, littoral {, . n etc- NA IV CaVatibility of proposed land use {� and natural characteristics : X (1) has been filled and no wetlands exist on -site: ,=f (1)`The site previously 1 rt• PART IV • SUMMARY AM RECOMMENDATIONS .Summery The Development of Regional Impact Assessment for Miami Center 1 (Miami Center existing and Biscayne Plaza) indicates that the project would have the following positive regional impacts: • lap to 2,500 permanent new jobs would be generated by the project, and, as a result, nearly 2,900 additional full-time jobs coula be created in South Florida, with a S103 million increase in total wages and S184 million In value added to the regional economy. ' a+or demand by an average of 415#0W a. increase potobI4 Meter and was+*% gallons per day and generate an average of 42 tons, or 149 cubic yards, of solid waste per day. a Increase annual energy use within the Region by the equivalent or nearly 6.7 million callons of fuel oil. Recommend a+ I an s Based an considereflon of the above specified positive and negative - impacts, it Is the recomendation Of the Council to the Miami City Commission that the Amended Application for Oov*lopmen+ Approval for Miami Center I be Aff`RQ%EDsubjoc+ to incorporation of the condj+jons lls+ed below into the existing Development Orcer to lmgreas* the probability of realizing positive r" lonal impacts and to mitigate, t • •. :.ter •• :: reduce, or eliminate adverse regional impacts. Adoption of a Development s Order (DO) with a cost allocation different from the one recommended below for construction of transportation improvements will net be a basis { for an appeal by the Council, provided that the D(i commits funding and ,t '. construction scheduling'that ensure the reculred improvements are funded 6 A and will be constructed coincident with the project, pursuant to s. z 380.0605)(02, Florida Statutes. THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY MILLI ayn_e_P haze 1. Incorporate the following into the project design and operation to mInNnlze the cumulative impact of project traffic, and its essocls+ed pollutant emissions, on air quality: • Designste three percent of on -sits employee parking spaces, located as close as possible to elevator and building = entrances, for exclusive carpool or vanpool use. • Actively encourage and promote car anti van pooling by • establishing a car pool information program. • Provide Metros i i , Nostrobus, and fttrotnover route and schedule information in convenient locations throughout the project. m 76 t y 2. Design; construct, and maintain the stormwater management system to meet the following standards: • Place rip -rap, temporary berms or other barriers to prevent discharge of construction -related runoff to the Say. • .Construct permanent berms or barriers, at least one foot above grade, along the eastern and southern perlmeter of the Site. • Retain the runoff from a 25-year storm on-slte, and construct 4' the project drainage system In accordance with all representatlons in the ADA. t= • fioute any and all parking area washdown water through oil and grease interceptors to a sanitary sewerline of prohibit any and }` all weshdown or project parking garages. 3, incorporate into the development, by restrictive covenant and 1sass or sates agreements, hazardous w0eria1s accident ' prevention, mitigation, and response standards. At a minimum, these s4andards shalt: �' • Require that areas within buildings where hazardous materials i . or hazardous wastas are to be used, generated, or atorod shall x.."` be constructed with Impervious floors, without drains, to �. 77 � Fy TTTT Require that the loading/unloading of any hazardous material or .hazardous waste shall occur In a covered loading/unloading dock with a spill containment area not connected to the project drainage or sower system. e.k "gi • Prohibit any outside storage of hazardous materials or xK hazardous waste. rH • Require all hazardous waste generators to contract with a, licensed public or private hazardous waste disposal service or processing facility and to provide to Dade County DEM copies of one of the following forms of documentation of proper hazardous waste management practices: a hazardous waste manifest; a shipmen+ to a permitted hazardous waste Manegm*n+ facility; or a confirmation of receipt of materials from a rocycler or a waste exchange operation. • Notify any tenant genereflng wastes of the penalties for Imoromer disoosal of hazardous waste oursuan+ to Cae+tan 403.727, Florida Statutes. 78 74 V 41 Zil •' Allow reasonable access to facilities for monitoring by the City, Dade County GERM, and Florida DER to assure compliance with this Development Order and all applicable laws and regulations. For the purposes of this Development Order, a hazardous waste generator shall be defined as the Applicant and any tenant that falls under a SIC code listed in.Exhibit 1 attached hereto and Incorporated herein by reference, and that uses, stores, or generates hazardous wastes. Hazardous wastes are defined as ignitable, corrosive, toxic, or reactive wastes, including those identified in Exhibit 2; provided, however, that the uses in Exhibit i and the wastes in Exhibit 2 shall be simultaneously amended upon the addition or deletion of any or all of the listed uses• materials, or wastes by amendment to the "County and Regional Waste Assessment Guidelines" incorporated by reference into Rule 17-31.03(2), Florida Administrative Code. 4. Remove all invasive exotic plants from the project site as the site is cleared, and use only fuse plant species specitleo In Exhibit 3 in future project landscaping. 79 S. 6. 7. a. 9. 10. Have a professional archaeologist on -site during all earthwork, notify State and County archaeologists of construction schedules, delay construction up to three months in any area where " potentially significant historic or archaeological artifacts are ,n'; uncovered, and permit State and' local historic preservation officials to survey and excaveta the site. ^z Contribute the project's fair share, as determined by the City for fire facilities. kt st�{{YY,,rr 1, Collaborate with City of Miami Fire Department to ensure that ti ti'8r appropriate fire safety measures are incorporated into projectF �y y design and construction. Collaborate with the Police Department to incorporate security =, measures and systems into the design and operation of the project. At the request of the City,*within one year of the effective data. of this Development Order, enter into an agreement with the Police Department to contribute a fair share of police capital facilities needed to resolve Clty concerns. Enter Into an agreement with the City to contribute a fair share of capital facilities required to provide adequate fire service to the project, or, in the alternative, pay a fair share contribution so r: pursuant to an adopted City impact fee ordinance pertrining to fire service, if such impact fee ordinance is adopted by the City prior to obtaining final certificates of occupancy for more than at 980,000 square feet of development., excluding existing development, on -site. ya 5ri 11. Incorporate the following energy conservation measures into the r; k. development: xf: 1, 3r Maximum flexibility of air conditioning systems to cool only a. f occupied areas Can a floor -by -floor basis at minimum). be Air distribution using variable air volume systems, if u �.. feasible. c. Minimum air conditioning energy _off iciancies (EER) of 10.0 in 4 buildings less than or equal to 250,000 square feet, and 12.0 in buildings over 250,600 square feet. d. Meat producing areas and equipment (cooking, water heating, {` etc.) isolated from air conditioned areas. e. Computerized elevator control system in all structures over 10 stories. d r, s a: S H r -261 t. Natural gas or. other non -electric energy sources for cooking and water heating.in restaurantst where feasible. g. Solar water heaters or waste heat recovery units to preheat cooking and washing hot water in restaurants• etc., where feasible. 4 h. Hot water temperatures set at or below tOS'F where allowed by health codes and equipment requirsments. Lavatory water flow of 0.9 gallons per minute or less than water closets that use no more than threw and one-half " gallons per flush. t 3. Tinted or reflective glass to reduce the amount of diract. areas. u: Sunlight entering air conditioned Light -reflecting and/or light colored wall ano roof,surfaceso with solar absorbtion coefficients less than or equal to 0.50. i.' Electrical metering on a floor -by -floor basis. M. Computer i Zed energy management system capab 1 e of start/stop optimization, asmand limiting, lighting control. and Zonal a control. e2 t, i within thirty (30) days of the effective date of the Development Order. The CADA shall be prepared as follows: a. Where new, clarified, or revised information was prepared subse"nt to submittal of the AIA but prior to issuance of r the 009 whether in response to a formal statement of Information needed or otherwise, the original pages of the ADA will be replaced with revised pages. t h b. Revised pages will have a "Page Number (R) - Date" notation. with "Page Kober" being the number of the original page, "(R)" Indicating that the page was revised, and "Oat*" stating the date of the revision. Y: i M 13. Prepare an annual report in accordpnce with the requirements specified In Condition 27 hereln and submit copies to the Council, City, and Florida Department of Community Affairs on or before each anniversary date of the Development Order. e3 Yr 14a. if a public sector financing package has not been committed prior to December 31, 1991, then, prior to obtaining any building permits for Biscayne Piaza Phase 11, front-end, which may include arranging loans to, or bond purchases from, appropriate government =T agencies. $317,00O (1985 dollars) to FOOT, based on an equitable reimbursement agreement among appropriate parties which shall specify interest rates and maturity dates, as the development's fair share contribution to the Brickell Avenue River Bridge replacement. iv Prior to obtaining any building permits for Biscayne Plaia, in +tie 5 event that construction of the Downtown Bifurcated Ramp system has not begun, fund or construct 100 percent of the interim roadway ' improvements identified as AM, AM, AM and AM in Exhibit 4 `- _ hw for suitable replacements mutually agreed upon by the City's Department of Public Works, Applicant, and SFRPC staff), to the City, pursuant to s. 380.0605)te)2, Florida Statutes. If a public sector financing package has not been committed prior to December 31, 1991, then, prior to obtaining any building a t permits for Biscayne Plaza Phase it, front end, which may include z a arranging loans to, or bond purchases from, appropriate government r agencies, $3, 027, 000 to FOOT, based on an equitable reimbursement agreement among appropriate parties which shall specify interest a rates and maturity dates, as the development's fair share contribution to the Downtown Distributor Bifurcatea Ramp system. '1 credit to FOOT for 100 percent of the costs of roadway modifications, identified by FOOT, Council staff or the Applicant. $ ttist exclusively serve Biscayne Plaza traffic. 1.6. Dedicate ell easements and rights -of -way which are located on thek: .y: h... .. ... southorn portion of Tree+ 0, Block 1, Dupont Plaza (I.e., t:�e '`� Biscayne Plaza property) which are for Biscayne Plaza and which are { required by the City. County, or State Fn order to construct ;:. required transportation imprmoments, including the second -level pedestrian system, if constructed. Tlf CITY WILL: 17. Approve no more than the amount of development specified by lava use category in Exhibit 5. . Is. As specified In Rule 9.1-2.25, F.A.C.► identify in the CRI Development Order any approved development, Including the acreage T' attributeble to each approved land use, open spaces areas for preservations and green belts; and the structures and/or improvements to be placed on the property, including locations, 85 f t` ,. acreages, gross square footage, number of units, and other major characteristics or components of the development. a 199. If a public sector financing package has not been committed prior to December 31, 1991, withhold issuance of any building permits for Biscayne Plaza Prase 11 until the Applicant front -eras, which may•include arranging loans to, or bond purchases from, �= r: appropriate government agencies, $517,000 to FOOT pursuant to - Condition 14a. y~; _ • 19b. Pursuant to s. 380.0605)(02. Florida Statutes, withhold issuance of Certificbtes of Occupancy for Biscayne Plate until all interim road improvements identified in Exhibit 4 are constructed. r ' 20. if a public sector financing package has not been committed by �U December 31, 1991, withhold issuance of any building permits for the Biscayne Plaza Phase it until the Applicant has front-enaed, which may include arranging loans to, or bond purchases from, appropr i ate government agencies. SS.027.000 to FDOT pursuant to Cond it ion 14c. a 21. MithWId issuance of any certificates of occupancy for the f tJ. ;h Biscayne Plaza Prase 11 portion of the project until construction r has commenced on (i.e., upon execution of a contract for 3 construction of) the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp system. t v. C Y " 22. Issue 'a CRI Development Order in accordance with the foilovIng criteria: a. The DRI Development Order shall specify: . • The name of the developnent. `x 4 o The name of the developer. • The authorized agent of +te developer. J A s+a+emen+ the+: The Applicatlon for Developman+ Approval (ADA) is r._ >.! approved; or n >. The ADA is approved subject to conditions, specifying the conditions; or - The ADA is denied. specifying the reasons for denial and changes in the development proposal, if any, the+ mould make I+ eligible +o receive a development • approval. b: Findings of feet and conclusions of low addressing whether and the extent to which: 87 VTJ 4 ;Y r zn*e• M ja I Q :.. a The development unreasonably interferes with the achievement of the objectives of an adopted state lend development plan applicable to the area; and - e The.development is consistent with the local land development regulations and +he aaopted local comprehensive plan; and e The development will be consistent with the recommendations of the Council ORI Assessment pursuant to Subset♦ion 3a0.06(11), Florida Statutes. } a The development makes "adequate provision for the public facilities needed to accemmodate the Impacts Of the proposed development" or the City commits in the 1. Development Order to provide these facilities consistent ` with the approved CRI development schedule. c, A legal description of the property Including acreage. 23. Incorporate the Consolidated Application for Development Approval, as revised pursuant to Condition 12, by reference into the Development Order for Miami Center as follows: 4 .F.w W/W-WW..y/1/..-W..- W. ..... - Incorporated herein by reference and relied upon by the parties in discharging their statutory duties under Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, and local ordinances. Substantial compliance with the representations contained in the Application for Development Approval is a condition for approval unless waived or modified by agreement among the Council, City, and Applicant, its successors and/or assigns." 24. incorporate the Council DU Assessment by reference into the Oeveiopnent Order* provided, however, that nothing set forth in tine Council ORI Assessment or in the CAOA shall be binding in any way ol- upon the owner of ^Miami Center existing" (the northern, developed ?` portion of Miami Center I consisting of the Pavilion Hotel, the -; Edward Batt office building and garage, and associated uses), its successors and/or assigns. �s 25. Provide the+ the effectiveness of the Development Order shall be stayed and no development permits thereunder shall be granted,- until such time as an Amended ADA, providing updated information, Is submitted to +he Council, City, and State and an Amended Development Order issued, If Biscayne Plaza Phase I is not under construction or built within 3 years from the effective date of the Development Order. Should the Development Order be stayed pursuant to this,condition, nothing herein shall be construed to limit Condition 29 below that this Development Order runs with the land,. and its terms and conditions are binding on the Applicant, its successors. and/or assigns. 89 y r xy ,y annual reporT requires oy conc mon z i nere i n. Yf. Reaulre that an annual report be submitted to the Council, City, and DCA on each anniversary of the effective date of the axe rw Development Order, which report shall include, at a minimun: , a. A complete response to each Question In Exhibit 6. b. ldentification and description of any changes In the plan of ;}} development, or in the representations contained in the ADA, ` or in the phasing for the reporting year ona for the next "or. 90 W...._.. — - ...� ..-� _ 4 ,,.:?t.:,•`�v_3:�',� ,n,. ; .',nK�nS.iP.'iktiY'�tv�1..'�.e�Y;. � individual single family lots, that have been sold to a separate entity or developer. e.. Identification and intended use of lands purchased$ leased or optioned by the developer 'adjacent to the project site since 'U the Development Order was issued. "T f, An assessment of the Applicant's and the local governments empliance with the conditions of approval contained In the a DRi Development Order and the commitments which are contained G3 In the Application for Development Approval. g. Specification of any amended DRi Application for Development Approval or requests for a substantial deviation determination that were filed in the reporting year and to be i J. A statement that all persons have been sent copies of the annual report in conformance with Subsections 380.0604) and (16), Florida Statutes. k. A copy of any recorded notice of the adoption of the Oevelopnent Order or any subsequent modification that was recorded by the Applicant pursuant to Subseetion 380.0604)(d), Florida Statutes. I. Copies of one of the following docunentations of appropriate disposal of all hazardous waste: • a hazardous waste menifest, • a bill of lading from a bonded hazardous waste transporter Indicating shipment to a licensed hazardous waste facility, or Affairs (DCA) in accordance with Section 380.0604) and (16), Florida Statutes (1985). 28. Incorporate into the Development Order for Miami Center a timeline showing the project phasing, specific elements of the project plan, and conditions of the Development Order which are to be met In each phase or by other specified dates. 49. Require, within 30 days of the effective date of the Development Order, recordation of the Miami Center Development Order with the Clerk, Dade County Circuit Court, pursuant to Section 380.06 0 4)(d), Florida Statutes (1985), specifying that the Development Order runs with the Biscayne Plaza land (the southern portion of Tract D, Block 1, Dupont Plaza) and is binding on Miami Center Joint Venture, its successors, and/or assigns, jointly or severalty. 30. Attach copies of all exhibits referenced in the DRI Development -Order. EXHIBIT 1 COAL ►Olt WASTE TYPES COMMONLY ASSOCIATED WiTH EACH 31G INDUSTRY A Waste pesticides D Washing and rinsing solutions containing pesticides C Empty pesticide containers D Spent toxaphene solutions or sludges from dipping E Spent pesticide solutions or sludges other than toxaphene from dipping F Dust containing heavy metals 6. Washings and rinsing solutions containing heavy metals N Wastewater treatment sludges containing heavy metals I Waste ink Ignitable paint wastes containing flassaable solvents (flash poi.; less than 1�0*r) K Liquid paint wastes containing heavy metals (cadmium, chromium, mercury or lead) L Spent solvents „ Still bottoms from the distillation of solvents N Filtration residues from dry cleaning operations 0 Cyanide wastes P Strongly acidic or alkaline wastes - Q Spent plating wastes R haste ammonia S Photographic wastes T Ignitable wastes (flash point less than 140•F) U Wastewater sludges containing pentachlorophenol, creosote; or. aeaenic V Waste formaldehyde W Lead•acid batteries ;..:.' X haste explosives , Y Waste oil 2 Other 94 :, 11 LIST Of POTENTIAL UZAIDOOS WASTE CENEfiATOSS ET SIC CODE& SIC West* topes Mac-iptlM Cede fill-ffp: ACR- . sees AK Core file Aec costae self AaC Tobacco all) ADC Svtar Crepe olbl Ali vegetable ad Melee Parents fill AK •Crop Crops' sit` AK Cites$ Fruit Cramer* 8/01 ADC Oreaar*sel flowicaltare ` Narserf trehcts Colt ADC Cea*rsI rates. prieswilf Crop ff11 AK $**I collie rodloto fflp Asc See# Collis. *scats Foodless foal.. Reaches) Ofti AK "top sea coat fares clot ADC comerat Livootocb Opts ASCT Sell feeporolion Services fill ADC" Crow pleallas. coltieoties. ad Frotectien off? LM Crop Narvestiet. primarily by Mockiae $124 1 Cott* Gieaieg •fie AT cenerol Crop services *psi A Livestecb servicoo. *Scott services for An1Nel- Specialities ifsl A Lauer a" card** services of$) AT Oraoeemtal Shrob And Us* services fall-fssl• FORESTAY kA Deis ARC Tlabor tracts "it ADC forest Nareerles a twos flea catb*rim/ A tatesetint "if ASCT Forester Services Ibtl•II,': COSTIMION 1611 LfWET Nitbwf teed $treet C0SInNtlN la?f Lfwn trial*. Toamet. and Clevated Bithwf Construction 1f11 lot plumbiat. Beetles (escape Aloelricl Sad Air Cesditionisl sill JILT Palatine. Paper Namting. sea Mcerstlm/. Nsavf Ca*etratti*m. NEC lftl LT Terretse. tile. "*Obits and Mosele York Ifs• JILT Floor Loflat ad Other Floorworh. NEC wt�afatttr bon bees ldeeeilid as o pet*stisl s***roter of beestaons was -ea $be basis oboe the isdostry afar $wastes* cetrosive. reactive. itsitsble. 0"fer tonic rotes. for annotate. SIC code fill. Soil preparation Sorvices. it t matn1:461 generator of sonic pesticide wool&@. cock SIC code listed is Table I toe previeaelp beta docweelea .is the liteesture as • Fstestial Seoerotet of kstardeas Wants. _ '01115C * Hot elsewhere ctoesilied SIC West* tips• Mscriplitn Cede IfAI Lt fleeting Cad Sheet !vial verb Ifel LT close sad closiwp usth 11141 LPN Lscovatiag seal Foundation Work 1111 JRLFYI Special Trade Coneracters aelp-"Ste: MAWFACTUNING omusTaitS sell Coned Specialties I"I Coaxed old Cured Fish Gad Seafoods fail LM Used WoWOO Fabric 16118. Wove last Lis Wawa* Fell Least% and No** Satisfy fall Lis Nesierv. Oscar& hors•• Fell Leattk A an •sgtle tall Lis limit Ooterwear Mills Ipst IN colt Nadeweor Mills fast IN Circalor Rail Fabric Niels -: nss LV warp Bait ra►ric MIIIs fist Lis Rmittist Mills. Re 2.61 LM finishers of stood waves Fabrics of Costae tab• LIT finishers of $coed Wovta fabric* of Man -Mad& Fiber Gad Silk 2I61 LV ►ieisbtre of stood Wave* Fabrics. Man -Mad* fiber sad Silk Rill IN Waves Carpets Gad Reps lips Lis teltd corpols and Ruts 0"" llfo L!1 Corp*ts and sags. NEC 2414 ALT Woad Ritchem Cabinets 2411 JILT Beeduood veneer old p/pwesd 14/b JUT Sales" veneer sea Vlpuod f 241si JILT Mobile Noses lNl JILT Prefabricated Wood eeildints ova Compemests INI • Hood ►reserviat lira LIT Particleboard ?sal JIL41 Wed Bwsebold retailer*. oacopt fyhdstr• a ISI4 NLOPQ Maul Nousebold Forsitate - Isll JRL4T We" 1V sed Rdio Cabinet* k lsto JtLVt Household ratsitare. NEC ISII JRL11It Weed Office farailare Isla NUNIp Hotel office furniture •sal JILMt Weal Vat&itions sea Iineares ISO 111)" Hotel ►orl It ions and Finteres 2611 LNfTT pulp Hills 2621 LMVTT tepee Mille. tocept avildial Paper `lilts 1611 Lwry Paperboard Mille I"I iLV Vapor Cooties and closiag L 2643 ILp sags. ter*pt Tratile sage _ IKs ILV fit -Cut Paper led pperbosrd sad CasJbesrj 24441 Up pressed and Mnlded •alp Gnats p ?Alt ILp Cowerttrd tepee end Feprebnaed peadaces. NIa I6}1 ILp Fnldialt ►arrebnoed a..aes Us! Up Set-wp popesbnoed aosre lbsl ILp Catraeased and Sot►d Fabrr snees NEC 0 Not elsewhere ciossifsrd 21 sic +lost• TWO seacciptism SIC waste Two seutiptins code Code dais OLPT sawitefy Iaod Csntwiwetw loll L. Uses L shoe Cut Stock s /isdings USS /Ln fiber Come. Tobea. seems. Mid ►list/at twed"ts SOS1 lobe L L Loathe• Clow*% ♦ Ititarss tlora•s foNwu. earl► Aihletie ' 1e61 Met s+i/ding paper a" s+ildies Ooord Mills Fill NILOI"Q Newspapers: publishlos MA palettes real Dill L L LasoN• wwew a Nand►ass b braes lift fill NILAPQ 111LOPQ Periodicals, publishing s Priatlse webs: hblishlas will "lmlias 111! L h•somsi o.•gthrr Goods fill NIL" Oaaa Ptia/lag left tool L IT Loathes Coeds. q.0 plat Class F. FdSI NILOI'Q Commercial Priaties. Letterstue 00 Scenes HIS AL+rich end Streclaral atop tale list list OILCWQ RILOPQ Cwamereiat priallog. Lithographic tescovias sad riot* per/ssi.g SAS AL **ante Vail sad Float lilt - list JILL •ilceats Chime pleshiss fiato•es awl eal4fums ' Fdsb IlttspQ Commercial ptiatios. Ctewta Accessories : 2161 NILOPQ Nawifold segues* forms Diet JRL •iorsoas thins Tables said Bitches wrticlra ` Mt dad NtLOtQ NttAPQ Cteetlas Card hbliebiaS alamhtaiebs. Loeeeleaf Wallace.and Devices M1 JaL pine [arobeauare IYAiteworl Ta►1• b gitchew 6 r: lost NILOPQ seehbisdiog tad 0e181e4 wt& /2!t AL Articles Porcelain, Electrical Supplier pdrl Fail NILOPQ T T►pesettias Aihalies and ehisrise 1:069 XL loosely products. sic €, poll?FOPi Iworgaoic Iismrals )!of INS T LT Abrasive ►redacts Cnb•4s. /acbims and StaOisg Devices felt MI BOPQAST Let" Industrial Inorganic Chomlcgle. RC plastics, Naierlots. $pathetic Rama*. sad fill T olssl Furnaces. se:•t worts. a"Ibeiiwp Milos Moo-uulcasizaboo [lastttwers fill jjlS T T [lecocametollarpical Projects Steel wire Orovies and Steal Mails asp Spib*s loll LOTT $pathetic Rubber 111! T Cold soiled Stt•t Sheri. Strip, and gars pall fall LNTT LMTT Cellulosic Ms -Node fibers syathetic Otsaaie fibers. stcept Cellolosle loll T Steel pipe and Tubes tall biological Pradect. jlll T Crsy leas ►o+wlries pass Mrdiciaeis sad seessieafe 112E T Malleable loos twwJries 1114 Lp 1L.MTT pharmaceutical prepecatiess Seer Other Detergents. accept Speciality Ills loll T I Steel foundries. Rif primary Smrleing sad s•liwisa of Lead } dint a" lots T Mieary Smeltiwa sea Britain& of zinc s FbsF ALMPTT Cleaners specially clessors. Wishes, swd $ssltsile* Dlai T primary production wt tlosioum 3 Paparatiaos jail T primary Smelting raj $closing of Icowftrrws 2") MOTT sorface Active ascots. Ilaishtws Ascots. Itn West*. Mee - Secondary Satis! asp stfisiss of Nomftre.we S.Ifsastd Oils. sad AssistanceD1b1 Motels " Fits CLTT ptcfwee. Cosmetics, sad Other Teilet prepaeatiems 11S1 110" Boiling, Drovies and [stradias at copper Fast 1ClJIpT letat sad allied pasdeess D1Sl NL11" Alaaimun Sh•el. Mesa a" foil � k. 1116E Fgb! "OTT T Cum and Moo/ Chemicals Cyclic Itsal Ta/) CrRdee. t� Cyclic lolorwlistes. /oSr NIJIMaf simulation[■er+dd produces3 w. Ryes. and Ocgsaic Figments (Lshgs asp Tenses) 11SS KNOW selling and Drawing. N[C Fibs LIWTT ladestalel Orgesic Chesicolo. KC' ))Sb Mt�11►pQf sellios. Draviap sea [atts/inp of Nowfetrees poll Nitros*neee Ierti/sear* Natal. incept Caplet and AlwiwUM � - Fads Must pesticide swd Asriceltersl Cheaieais. KC Ifs► Milk" ealstiag of Nfeeruas wire Drawing ant Iwos ., r lost Adh•siveo and $*gloats 11AI DK21 T it$goes. AluminumIowwdcies IGstiwpsf steel*. Copper and Copper Oast Allow JatF [■plosives Iowwdfies Fpl) iCLJM' Prins ins lab IK! f Noafe••oue fwwdries ICavliagsl. s[C pbel plot► L"U#IV T Chemical Proporstieas priceless Da/ioiws lolR NLIM►pQT Natal Neal Torettws {` post T Aophesc polls sea cootiass list NIIMWW Primecv Metes /804at1%. MIC 1 "rest Caws pltF ?,tt T T Lebrecsttag Otls osd Creases peoducto of htcsl*we a" Gal, PsC fill i.l! NL1M►PQT auMtrQT - 1Mta1 %ippinR !store., OPIUM%, seat, sea ►art% = Isot �JeT Miscellanea" Naelic "*#Mae (Drum peintshtsgl olio L Loonier teasing and trials Aiwg Is21 , M1.1Morp case let t , #ECr^* Ilws<.;lsRllMTtrs�M(I�L�it�l.,a M[c w Not,tl*evhrre clgssilit/ . .r M sic geese types Description SIC Wosee Typed Mssriptiew Code Code 1421 NL1l0PQT Naar ad Edge feel#. Escept Machiat teal• and Jul am" sit ad Go$ Compressors Need sow DIGS IN MPQ slowe Sad Eshsase Vvalileciam ran* 142% Nll10PQT Head saw s Sag slates M1 NLgprw Iodustrial pra/ees Furnace a Nftas 1479 Serfage&. NEC Me NL!k1PQt Mechowical fewer Traremisaiea Sq+iprot. we 1411 ML"DPQ Consoled Igoe sad "test Samissfy rase 1161 stwwQi Geartal ladeaseia! Machinery and Egwiparal. NEr 1412 NLWWQT Plasbins Fiats## wittiest Sad Iris Igloos toads) )$it NLsMirg tlecttenic Cwmputame Eg•sipwat . 1411 KLMOPQT Realist Egaipmeat. except Electric and were Ale 1SPi nLgnrq Calculating 6 Accouasing Markings. enctps Forneces Electronic Lgaipral . 1441 Im.110PQT Fabricated Structural motel lice 01.10nP9 office Machines. Men' 1461 NLwwQT Metal Dsors. Soso. Frame&. Ileldiase. end trim 00 NL'aim Cemrrciat Laudrg. Dry Maples. and pressing 1461 NLMOPQT Fabricated plate Wor% Nackines 1444 NLIMPQT sheet 1lvial Wort 1SIS NL'MNQ Alt Cewditiesing sad mar• All Dealing Egaipr 1446 MENOPQT Arfbittcturel and Ilrm"4141 Metal verb mad Commercial and Indussriet selrigr.atia•. 144E NtDtLDm Pgela►ricaetd metal Mildimso and Compensate Equipment 3449 WJMPQT Niecellaoeeae Metal Netb 1Sgb NLmO/Q measuring wad sispensias ►ogee Use NL110PQ1 Screw Meebint Prodecto 10669 NOD" Se#vice Industry Mackiave. NfC 16S2 NLMPQT salts. Sets. Strews. sivets. and Washers 1S12 MLNOFQT Carburetors. pistons. Viacom sings • Valve# 1461 NtJMPQT Igoe and steel Forsiass )Sul NL4nm Machinery. tncepl Electrical. KC U6S IN..MOPQT Aecosative Staspiess 1b12 ut-40PQT roarer. Distribation ter Specialty Treasideres 14611 NLMnPQT Metal Sleepiest. NEC 3611 NUIOPQ Switchstaf 6" Swieckboaed Apparacae DOI wstorQT Electroplating. Va IMS#e 11161162. Amedlaims. J621 NLNOPQ motors A Gooerators and Colories 16:2 M1.NOPQ Industries Conceals 1419 N£NOPQT Coating. Ensroviss. and Allier Services. KC 1621 ML40ro Meldins Apparatus. Electric 1417 Small Arms Ammunition .1624 NL400`9 Carbew a Grapkity ►roducts list Animosities. except for Seal) Arse. NEC 3620 ww" Electrical ladvstrial Apparatus. MtC KD 1419 Ordnance and Accessories. etc 1612. NLVOPQ Nwasehold Relfigeraters and Some, and Farm Freerere Jill NLIIDPQ stets. Coe. Sad Nrdraalic turbines 1616 KNOPQ Electric Nows&wagte and Fans )SIR MLM M'QT latermal Combustion EwgineS. NEC 1416 NL40pQ Sewing Nackievs Dill NLNOPQT Form machisery and tguipa&nt 1414 K40PQ Nawtthold Appliances. NEC DS24 MLIMDPQT Garden Trotters 6 Lem S Garden Egw1peeat 1641 NL`ID►Q Electric Lays JS11 MLMOPQT Constractiom Machinery Sd Elalpmeal 16A1 NLNOFQ Carrool-Cstgyies Mice Devices 1S12 51LMP'QT Minims Nechisery sad Egaireset. eacept all field 164S NLMM9 Residential Electric Lighting Fistares Jill W"FQr Oil Field It"hiaery and Epiprat 3646 NLlM Coartciai. ladestriel. and Iastitatieael MI, Nt1M►PQ Conveyers and Congeries Egaipasat Ligbeins Fsacares 1511 NaJMOPQr Industrial troche. Trotters. Trailers. Sad 164T NLM" rtkicaler Lighlian Equipment slather* MM NLW" Sadie L television aeceivsns Stls IS41 NCNDFQf machiwa Toole. metal Cattle& 102 NLM PQ Fhoaegrapk Records ad Foe-racefdvd flagmelic Tape 1$42 NLJMDFQT Machias Teol#. Iletat Forging 1661 *UK" Radio sad Television Tramsmisting. Sisnnlies. Sal )S44 MLJMOPQT special bits end Toole. Nit Sets. JI&t and Detection Equipmeat sad Apparatus Fixteres. awl ladestrial fields 1614 Sam" stsiconductors and Boosted Devices lS4S NLMOFQT fiochime tool Accessories 6 Madearles Devices 161% NL"Q Eltcstosic Copeci/ots PSi6 NLIMM"QT re"t Delete Moan Tools 1411 Ntmor" tloetremic Cools. Treastarres. and Other Imlotlwre M1 KPIMMi "real Mashing Machiwery. sic Mill NIJMIPQ tlectresic Components. NEC )SSI NL~QI Fawd Fradelts machietry 1691 amp Storage Batteries TM MAOMt lentil* Mochirrr 3492 NFQ primary satteries. Off and Mrs IM ILt1MDPQT Meodworhiss Machinery )Ill hotel Vehicles and Passenger Car sodsee ISS4 W MWQT Paper lodustcita Machinery 3114 NLMDPQt lk.sor Vehicle Paris and Arcrssuries )SSS N6N/rtQT • Prinlias lead** Mw%ieorr and Egaiporet )►IL NIJUWQ Magog 040we 1ST♦ NlWWQT SPreinl Industry Nsckinery. NEC 1111 NIMePQ Aigcre/s y )1Al 1111NM"QT -0aape and Puppies.Equiprsl //:4 11I MIrQr Aiutall Engiave sad taring Polls DS62 NLNN W hall sad soli&# seariesa )I!$ Nl.tu►1yt Aiecsall ►are• and Aamrlrarf Egaipasal. Mfg' E j li€C R Nat elsewhere tlasaitied not M.rl ele►whrfe, elaetilivd i i0 'I sic wane Types Deeuiptiem fie Waste Typos Drsceeplioa Code Code )III otion QT ship beiidiag sea arpoirisg &Sol T Air Ttenspettelisa. Crstificolod Cortices list se.HOPW lost bildia® ant sepoiries 4SR1 T &Isporl* sea 117ewe peplAs loll New" Ewsiosesies. Scitatifie. Laferatsty and @@search GSnI LIT Airport Terminal Services laeerwatets 4411 JNLPTT Ccads Prtrolrw rip Lines sett RUN Q Autsm tin Contests fog Regulating @eaidestial and 4411 JOLPTI bfised Prtrelpum Pope temps Commercial Eawiteaaents and Appliances 4619 JNLPT Pip- Lines. INK M ? NLXM Industrial Instruerwts for Mtoserins, Display, mad 4111 LT TelepAowt Communication IWir* or Radio) Contest so (recess Variables, end Neloted anal IT media Igedcasliwg Predates GR11 LT Television Srosdcasliws - 3024 NLMOPQ Totalities plaid :attars sad Camels$ Devices 4911 T Electric Ssrviges alit NLNOPQ Isotruaeots for Me@serie$ awn Testing of Gill T Electrical 4 Other Services Electricity a" Electric Signals 4911 T cat 4 other Services rile NLMM Neasoeial sea Comtrellios "Cos. WC 4919 f Combination Utilities. NEC loll NLMORQ Optical la@ttsoeses end Lane** LISP T Sower*$* Systems )#41 NLMnPQ Sarsical sod Medical asn rumrata old Awesome 4951 T le/eve Systems 1842 111.000PQ orthopedic. Prosthetic. and Saryical Appliances 49S9 ASCT feeilary Services. Wr a" sopplies 1941 XIJIM Dental Epipreat sea fopplie@ S4191-Sill: WNMISALE tsADE lost NIJNM'Q Ophthalmic Cede 1861 Winn Phologrophic Eolpeeet "a Sgplies Soil T Scrap 4 Waste Mattcials. M►olosele Hit sim" Watches. Clods. etc. 3141 LPTT Chemicals and Allied Pradecle Uhelesale )tit NLMOPQT Jewelry. precious Nate) Soot A porn Supplies 191E NeJoOPQT Silverware. Plaid Mere. and ftolele@a steel Were S19@ JOLT Palo@&. rataishes. sea Supplies )its RJLMO►Q jeweler** findiegs 4 Motorists s Lopidarr Wary 194! NJRLMO►Q Coseume Jewelry and Coolest Novelties. accept S1o1-S9S4: NETAIL TSADE '° c>z ►rociaws Metal 1964 NJOLMOPQ NeeAlea. Pies. Nesks and eyes. and Similar 5211 JOLT 100161. class, sea Wallpaper Stores Netian@ 52111 AJOT Naraware Stores 1991 NIJOLMOPQ signs awn Advert/elm$ Displeye SM JOLP MAilt Nome Dealers )991 NJteJNWpQ Social Caskota Soil AIJKI Deparleral stages 1999 NJ&LMO"TT Mawalocterial tsdestties 5199 AIJOT Niscellsnews a*aerel Merchandise Slot*@ 4011-49W TNAMSPOr htION AND PDSLIC DTII.iTiEg %%is NWT "slot vehicle Desloge INew 4 VIVA, His LWT Meter Vehicle Drslets (Used Only$ 40I1 $WT Railroads. Lime-@wi Dpe►stiag SS11 LPW Auto 4 Nome Supply Stotts 4111 LfWT Local a" -$*Webs* Transit Sul LWT cosslise Service Stations. Retail 4011 JeLTT switching 4 Ttr:niwel E@tablishrwte SSSI LWT goat Dtoi*e@ 4119 LWT Local Pasetager Ttawepettatiem, DEC SS11 LWT Motorcycle Dealer@ 4111 LIWT Tsaicaka SS99 LIWT Amlonotive Dealers. SIC 4111 LIWT Intercity and Rural NI$lwop Paaaen$ar 5121 Moosthold Appliance Stores. Retail Transportation SIG) LT Automatic Metchandising 'Ischtmt operator-* 41SI LWT School luxe@ Slot T feel 4 Ice Dealers 4tII T Msialts@wce s Service facilities Sot Motor vehicle 11910) T elect oil Destege Paseesger Trae@persewios S9SS T Liqeclied ptlroltuo cos Dealers 4111 JILIWI Local Truckles without Storage IIIS-9081: SINVICIS INDUSTN KS 4111 JNLMT Trucking. Escape total 404 JWt WT Local Trucking will, Starts* pigs LM Coin Operstrd Lowmdeies and ivy Cirsmins 4211 Jerry Tracking Terminal Facilities I114 LM Dry Cleaning Floats, Incept suit Cleaning 411t JELWT V.S. postal Service (Vshiclo lbir,tea mco Onlyl fill IJI Carp@ and uphni•@eey 4411 T Veep Sea regeism transportation Ills III Inda•tg[s! Lsuw*erses 4" 1 Marine Carle Namaling /)AI LT /oopeal Services an.$ ftemAtoties 444r9 inray Utter Ttenspottati•ft servitea. WEC 1111 IJNLi Dvtdoor Advretitins Sre nor• sI1C w Not tlaaw6fre clessifief M1 •Mot elseut,err claseiliea 3. �t l �l e, $RC Usage Tyree Rtecalmien sic (taste Tyree Description Cede Code lID1� in ddvertieiag. ■ e MII-6iN: nISCtLIAReRRi list tat Dirsct Mail Atweetioing services lilt LMt slaeptist ad Pallocapyias $*role*$ KII JSLPT Ilwtaoo and All Geologies , till Lot Caooercis$ Phelestapby are. and graphics •K Aebegate. solenicel and -geological ieodesa ' P142 ACIW Disinfecting and eateraiootlem Services 11M LPT Reocessercisl ustetleasl. Scientific. Rod plot Pas Cleaning ad 'laistenasta services to beollnge Ekganiseliaea and Ether salMogs. RTC DND JR Services. SIC t"I LPT Research and Development Laborstorles plot or"ST Pholofiniohiwg Laborsteriva fit? LPT Commercial Testing Laboratories Plot tiro ratiogvishor Charging sesviete Mt LAft Passenger Car Restal and Leesios, witaeot Driver* poll LPMT teach Mantel ed Lessees. oltheat driven polo LPM IWtilily trailer "A secrestlesal vehicle RMtel Mt LOW Top ed sedy Strait sage. Automotive PS14 LPM Tire Reereding sod Repair shape. Astamstive ills LPM Point Sutra. Alit~ ive ills LAWT General Astemotive Repair seeps tilt LPMT Autemetife Repair 1;%o►o. KC isii LPT Radio a television Repair $ho►s 1611 LPT Soltilosetisn b Air Ceoditioning•eervice k„ir $bops 1610 LPT electrical & electrsoic lepole shops. KC pets LT Watch. Clock. and Jewelry Streit D Itr4# JOLT swuphelstery god Parsilate Strait <: lot. LAW Melling Repair 1694 LT Armature Rovisditg Shape We LT Repair Shops and Related services. on Tiecladieg iesittesitesl post LEST $*twice• furled to Mallon Pictere fgdettlea poll JaLT theasticel Pcodocare (escept nation Pictures) Tod Mioeellaweoas Thesttica/ setvlua 1901 AK Fault Cell Cet+gstt pool ,LPT Coin-oipetattd Amusement Devices 19% JKLPT Aovtomeat Porte pout AJR Amueeoenl and Recreation services. DK DRht LPT Coastal nedical and surgical Neepltslo gust LPT Specialty WSPItels. •seer& Psychiatric IlOt't LPT Radical Lo►atstories b..e "it LPT Dental Laboratories RNI LPT @oepotioot Care 6ocilitles sell -Rill: ESKATIMAL SIMMS sic a nag eloesiets elusifid' site JtLPT el*ratery ant Secedsry Schools girt J[LPT Cetlegrs. gniv*rsitite. PgoQeselenal Schools. i ad Janie# Colleges'.': 0149 J6LPFT vocational Scheels, escape vocational tliglt schools. KC Rift ALPT Schools e-4 taatational Strait**. WC tilt ALT Jab Training and vocational Reaobilltotimm Services a � RTC • Rot cloreaett tlsesitiel Grow###@* robust* ISM Cobs Plumorft spp.* irr"Oposol Tory larve Or", mot for residential was. Pol"Clowe potcherrome lowerf pol"Cianst Gualocan senctsm IL§gnw*-vlfml fteadophosain sorgestil IFforlde cherry paler) goes Cutting Motown bolowl PtVc hosperes ologigas fSestrothis palm) Jacerands ocotllollo% lJocersaftl FIVc1iosporms awarlbaril INKArtbw palm) Jonipares sillicicafe fSowfkarm red cedars wor eve wirginins (Live ooh$ Krogiodeadrom ferrous Mack Iramaoodl Misophors mongle lead songrowel LaWsfrowle Indices f0rape Nottlet 11oy0oo*& state leaves poles L apemcolaris rogamoss 111kite swWwal ftystomes, rupee Icubso royal poles ticarts friondra, fGall licarfal SaM palmetto fcd*ep palm) • Licusis gra"166 11.1cools pole$ Serewoo repass fSev palmetto) Llcuslo sM.8 11.1cuals potm$ Sloaroubs glows, lForediso treat tysitcas bakamensis (Wild tonarlod) fa Soletente mabogmi IVast Indies Salt.09mays 7� 1.15110" latisilque (Wild tonarlads Isbabals argesteem 111roe of gold) Phollhare b6lismansle (Wild d11111 Tabobals, pal I040 1101oh trumpet frost PostIchode*41ron fooffillsslave MOM Pass h1brides IS~&) Towlades Indices 110418 Temorlado Tormfoolle catapps f1ropfcal almond) 011wries corifers Iscatbern van Myrtles tenodls fewesst fjorossom thorn! ihorms Viespeole popwiness IPbrtlo fres, seaside mohmel ftitaphwift ftermso 116110" polociames Thriew morrisil (Kays thatch poles rifts clause ISM4,1plool Winow perwillors 41hatch polo) pie" *1110#11 !Slash pixel Woman radials Ifforlds thatch palm) -40 plus$ 611#01if Vw. Carib** (Kays O&A plus$ WIN" Sapp. 11katch palm) riscide, Poscipules fjoselce dognsed, Waskingtom robust& fWashiallon Poles Posowle twolic species • Sotercez SIRPC i k �1 I shrabs, Wines, end Wooed cvers _ o_ Castes spp. lsplral IIeg1 Olsrgotheco harchoeeems tpalse erect/a1 tlodomses viscose tWormish #sell - Acelrphe hospidas ICbnllta pleall Oeabere se111M11 1PImh bells Acalros sllhaslamN tlbpperisell Ereathamtle .errosoa telw $a") Alocascs spp. ftlep% mt ear/ Eegamle emlllerls 111hite stopper$ AI®owls "P. esbell too" l fvowle comfase filed berry$ Amoeelams tTorch glw ! fowl* foellh ispswlsh stopper/ Ardis's Cremate lChrostow berry) Pests fowl-3 grtoldes Ispealsh slopped Aspergas spp. IAsperges farm$ porestlere ssyrageta tplorlds privet$ tlegomle spp.e tltea he"Ma1 Gardemis jasslwoldese IGaNewlel Oeeacermes recerests Voar•talll Grylre discolor 101o11r/ Noalgslmvlllee spp. Ifba9emr111N/ Hmaetle pefems Iscarletbashe flrebeshl��,s N iAores tlselrChllss cortimerisst IOstisrflr Illlrl i tressele actlmoplerlla Ischafflerst 1ledrehlssl Olen" Irelloe Illlrl Orrosonlme lacide etocastbwr,$ IttlrcAitln gsromarlewerl NAM Illlrl Calloandre haasstocaphses 1Powd"f/l MAhchlaw spp. 160wgar Illlrl Calllcsrps amerlcams IIMerIcM besetrbeshl pellamthes Al IMS Itleach sawlloeerl Ceapsls redlcenss (Trw"t vlMl lllbloces rose-siwenslsa tlliblscesl Gssle spp.a IGsslel lgmewocsolos Istllolle' ISplder Illlrl �. Cessls B&NO erslss Icasslal Iles glabrea (Gellberrr) Chrrsobsesses ►ceco ICoeoplem)!, Ilea vomltorle manse IGaarf reapow holly$ ClNlem Iseagrsss6 Ipomase %pp. Iftoraing glories, railroad vinal Cod/sew vsrle"tas ttrotowl Iva treclemscans Illrsh alder$ . Conocar.as oracles (Green Aattowaood) Iva Imbricate ISeecoast marsh elderl COnoterpas Kectes swiceas tsllwr bet 1O0pfld$ - - - - - - Jec�elwla Merensls IJoe.00dl r =i 1lyrice tortfurs lsostwo um aWrle, anyeerryr Istraeygla bicolor Ilotreryols. fast ladles Met _. NepArolopls leos4owlorsls 46ostoa /oral ib~gla orecte• (Slogs - Ilaotlel 4R apogm jepwelces• llbads vrressl 1lessber�le sad.• 161ad� rlasl • f wo.is obtrsllolls EPoparaolel 1pKallls glows Illelrslllsl Petrea volubillsi IQrasa•e rreatlel tracbolospermum jaselmoldes• ICowledarete jese11es1 PAaeowurle spaclosa• IloreM Singer) WON pealculato IS•s osts/ Pbttodouedraa spp.• ECslloun. yA►IrioAse�rMl e1MrwM1 seespasseN ISeodsnMrs ribrrorol Plsss stiletto* reria/y dsass Made county PIMI •acu alepleaee4lpas ISpleeolsss ysccd Pltbwo#blee. gosysl•peass• lblu besdl Isola /lorldoos 10matlal Ptwrls sop. IPren,fpeall Iaotliwylew tswe IMlfd IIMe/ Pbdscsrprs spp.• Ilbloterpwl Polysclss ballarrfess• liallosr orallel ;T Pbatedssis IPicherotraNl Id YI • Eoolic spades Psychotria wervoss Wild cottN/ ,� .: Sources SrWC A. pl •ta lmgrovsnents 1. SE 2hd Avenue and SE 3rd Stroet Adjust west curb an public land on southbound approach and adjust traffic signal heads as required, +0 crests four versus present three southbound through Imos. Lane drop to be ass ily accdsmodated south of intersection within eelsting pavammt through Is" turn at Biscayne Boulevard May prior t0 Orickell Avenue bridge approach. Modify signing and striping throughout section as required. ?. SE Znd Avenue and SE Ind Stroet Adjust channelization curbing in southeast corner to provide two wstbound through lanes and three separate Is" turn Imes, plus one free flow Is" turn lane Inside modified chmneilzstion island. Two of the left turn Imes for access to 1-95 sntrmce rasp near SE 2nd Avenue and SE 3rd Street, one amdetory and arts optional. 3. ` aIsew Plate Project Entrance Entrance and ex I+ drives to be coordinated with ultimate bifurcated ramp design and City of Miami Public Works Department. Aaometric alterations at project drives near Biscayne Boulevard May and Biscayne Boulevard May. is to ,This Include revised drainage as necessary, outside pavement widening within existing right of ways signalisstion of exit drive to be installed when warranted, and revised pavement markings. Also - provide custom material and construction for _ spproxlmctely 1.200 feet of sidewalks along project street frontage and river•alk frontaget and all seating, lighting, and landscaping, all for public Use* 1. GIsca , *, Boulevard May Access ibadvey City to preserve present public right of way for separate 181 eastbound access roadway soutti of Biscayne Boulevard May to extend from SE 3rd Avenue to Biscayne Plaza project south vehicular traffic entrance. Prestervat ton to extend at least to date of .Compleflon of project Lase 2. (Separate access roadway not deemed necessary y to pro j*ct Phase 1.) ldC - - -'s' Avenue City seeks approximately five feet of add it tonal right of ray withi7. this block that is necessary to create three we0bound lanes, an addition of one travel lane. At the Miami Avenue Intersection, this hnprovement would allow a separate left turn lane, a separate through lane, and a separate lane used as a Off Ice* Comore ial Phase (Sq. Ft.) Note (Sq. Ft.) Residential* Miami Center 791,000 634 Units 96,297 0 Existing 669,000 S.F. Biscayne Plaza 7009000 0 160,000 60 Units Phase 1 120,000 S.F. (Incl. podium) 91scayne Plaza 790,000 0 609000 gz 90 Units - Phase 2 3 i * If the market is unfavorable for construction of the 150 residential units, the Applicant will.construct the 300,000 square feet as office space. Y� SOURCE: ADA z 107 71. a S EXN181T 6 S:A.t OF FLORM SLWI*-C7-85 097AR:::EN: OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DIVISION OF RESOURCE FLAKNING At:D MA..NA'vt::2::' RURAL• OF LAN AN iiA�LR K11t:AGL`:L::1' 2572 t:teutive Center Circle, East Tallahassee, Florida 32302-8244 (104) 418-4825 Subsectien 380.06(16), Florida statutes, places the responsibility on the developer of an app:oved developeerz C_ regional impact (DRI) for submitting an annual report to the local government, the Regional planning Council, the Depa:_catz of Community Affairs, and to all affected perm:, agencies, On tya date specified in the Development Order. The failure of a developer to submit the report on the date specif ied in the development order may result in the temporary suspension of the development order by the local government until the annual to;::: Is submitted to the review agencies. This requirement applies t: all developments of regional impact which have been approved since August 6, Isla. If you bave any questions about this required report, Call the DRI taforeement Coordinator at, (9:4, 488-4825. SLiCMI-07-15 Page Two 1) Desetibe any Changes made in the proposed plan of development, phasing, or in the representations contained ia.tye Application for Development Approval since the Development Of Regional impact received approval. Please note any actions (substantial determinations) taken by local govetnment to ad_:ess these changes. Metes If a response is to be more then one sentence, attach as tsbibit •A' a detailed•desciption of each change and Copses o. the modified site plan drawings. Zsbibit °A' should also address 1 abl the tellowang additional itema if app is We t) Describe changes in the plan of development or phasing got the reporting year and for the subsequent yeas: b) State any known incremental DRI applications fa: developpment approval or requests for a substantial deviation determination that were filed in the reporting year and to be filed during the nest year; e) Attach a copy Pf any notice of the adoption ofi development order or the subsequent modification of an adopted development order that was recorded by the developer putsuant to Subsection 3I0.06(24)(d), F.f. I) Sas there been a change in local goverment jurisdiction nm for any portion of the development since the development orde: vas issued? If so, has the tInq local government adopted a sea Development of Regional Impact development order for the project? Please provide a copy of the order adopted by the annexing local government. 1) provide copies of any revised master plans, incremental site plans, etc.e not previously submitted. Motes If a response is to be more than one or two sentences, attach as Zxhibit •B.• 1) Provide a summary comparison of development activity proposed and actually conducted for the reporting year. 0amples Number of dwelling Units constructed, site improve seats# lots sold, acres mined, gross floor area constructed, barrels of storage capacity completed, permits obtained, etc. Motes If a response if to be use than one sentence, attach as zxhibit 'C.° S) Save any undeveloped tracts of land in the development (other than individual aingle-family lots) been sold to a separate entity or developer? If so, identify tract, its Sias. and the buyer. Please provide saps which show the tracts Involved. Tract Buyer Note: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach as Lxhibit 'D.° i) Describe any lands purchased or optioned adjac"t to tbs original Development of Regional Impact site subsequent to Issuance of the development order. Identify aucb laud, its si:e, and intended use an a site plan and map. Notes If a response is to be mote than one sentence. attach as Zxhibit `t'.• 109 fk ` W • >1LMM•07•IS ` Pate Three 7) List any Substantial local, state, and federal pee-::s which have been obtained, applied tot, or denied, during t::s repotting period. Specify the agency, type of permit, and d;;z fat each. pates :f a response in to be more than one sentence, a::ach as tabibit °F.• 1) Assess the development's and local government's con- tinuinq Compliance witb any Conditions of approval contained in the DA: development order. Pates Attach so tabibit 00.10 (Bee attached form) !) Provide any infatuation that is specifically requi:ed by the Development Order to be included in the annual report. 10) Provide a statement certifying that all persons have been sent copies of the annual teport in conformance with • subsections 380.06(24) and (li), F.S. Person completing the questionnaires Title$ Representing: ? >` i 110 14 e -. .:.;`•'^gr„j��s', �, .,s•.,res •Av4l+: q- ..,.. �'F�"/?•^*�'•.•�'•_•'^--�' ,d,,,,.. r. • �� f.. a .. � . .. ry R.... .. ;, •. . ir:�pe•�, �,; �: ,,.,, a qti .: .... .. EXHIBIT "0" The entire development site consisting of Miami Center Existing an scayne aza (as proposed) is described as follows: • Tract "Dew DU PONT PLAZA, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 50 at Page it of the Public Records of Dade County. Florida, - being more particularly described as follows: Begin at a point 25.00 feet South of the Monument Line of Southeast 2nd Street extended Easterly and 1067.24 feet East of the Monument Line of Southeast 2nd Avenue and run East, parallel to and 25.00 feet South of the Monument Line of Southeast 2nd Street extended - fat 645.94 feet; thence South 0 degrees 04 minutes 07 seconds East for 352.27 feet to a. Point of Curvatures thence Southwesterly along a circular curve to the right, having a radius of 65.26 feet acid a central angle of 71 degrees 02 minutes 59 seconds, for an arc distance of M AO feet to a Point of Tangency; thence South. 70 degrees 58 minutes 52 seconds West for 73.53 feet; thence South 70 degrees 58 minutes 36 seconds West for 744.58 feet (last mentioned five courses being coincident with the boundary. of the afore- mentioned plat of DU PONT PLAZA); thence North (radial to the next described curve) for 34.61 feet; thence Northeasterly and Northerly along a circular curve to the left having a radius of 112.50 feet and a central angle of 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds for an are distance of 176.715 feet to a Point of Tangency; thence North for 377.00 feet to a Point of Curvature; thence Northeasterly along a circular curve to the right, having a radius of 300.00 feet and a central angle of 28 S degrees 34 minutes 00 seconds for an arc distance of 149.57 feet to a Point of Compound Curvature; thence Northeasterly along a circular curve to the right, having a radius of 25.00 feet and a central angle of 61 degrees 26 minutes 00 seconds for an arc distance of 26.81 kfeet to the Point of Beginninge lying and being 1 in the City of Miami, Dade County# Florida. } i` f: MANW "".. +.•'�'"'. "*°`" : • fr.,2 ;.6t:.?.!.','a4a*:,rI• M/iu' • . «d�.IFi.' .',w&:' .. {'.. •,.. .t- n a{yn+i•+. ar ' � � • :•. brie �rRr.^ .. � "' ... e+�M1'!` : p.Ri' at•arec s� e� .^�': sm. w_ .. r•i•• • • t• .. _ r....__........ it EXHIBIT "E" That portion of the property containing Miami Center "$xisting is described as follows: Being Wit portion of Tract D, Block 1, 'duPont Plaza,"'according to plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 50 at page 11. of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Begin at the Northeast corner of said Tract D and run West along the North line of Tract D for 645.94 feet to a Point of Curvature; thence Southwesterly along a circular curve to the left having a radius of 25.00 iaet and a :;enrrul angle of 61 degrees 26 minutes 00 seconds for an arc distance of 26.81 feet to a Point of Compound Curvature; thence Southerly along a circular curve to the left having a radius of 300.00 feet and a central angle of 28 degrees 34 minutes 00 seconds for an arc distance of 149.57 feet to a Point of Tangency; thence South for 2936'50 feet (said last mentioned four courses being coincident with the boundary lines -of said Tract D); thence East for 179.41 feet; thence North for 250.00 feet; thence East for 5225.36 feet; thence Worth 0 degrees 04 minutes 07 seconds West along the East line of said Tract D for 300.00 feet to the Point of Beginning, lying and being in the City of Miami, Dade County, Florida. �N•• r e . ,~�(�. ••�♦n. �•�,II •.n �„�.�"'M�Sd�t',•Km+ww•�isse*'eYi.�..�•`+�s+.�y.w.et+_A.. :�es+ .�.~^'•a•" ,. .. r heq Y .. a 6"i%'^°! :ie -: LL•'.. •�•!•i �' � • , .. . . • -._ 'M.v�i. �... _._���tir�.r�. •�.��d.4�'w�S14r1:.:.�; ^. L_al...�••SI.�it.•� _-_�ar��ik�ii.-'v I EXMIBI? "F" That portion of the property containing Biscayne Plaza, as proposed, is described as follows: Being that portion of Tract D, Block le "du Pont Plaza", according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 50 at Page 11 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Northeast corner of said Tract "D" and run South 0 degrees 04 minutes 07 seconds East, along the East line of said Tract "D", for 300.00 feet to the Point of Beginning of the parcel hereinafter described; thence continue South 0 degrees 04 minutes 07 seconds East along, the East line of said Tract "D" for 52.27 feet to a Point of Curvature: thence Southwesterly along a circular curve to the right having a radius of 65.16 feet and a central angle of 71 degrees 02 minutes 59 seconds for an arc distance of 80.80; feet to a Point of Tangency; thence South 70 degrees 58 minutes 52 seconds West for 73.53 feet; thence South 70 degrees 58 minutes 36 seconds West for 626.56 feet; (said last mentioned five courses being coincident with the boundary lines of said Tract "D") thence North along the Easterly Right -of -Way line of Biscayne Boulevard and its Southerly prolongation for 191.81 feet; thence East for 179.41 feet; thence Borth for 150.00 feet; thence East for 525.36 feet to the Point of Beginning, lying and being in the City of Miami, Dade County, Florida. /I MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN FIGURE 1 f FIGURE 2 ,j~, �•}!C* �. •• -1..i '.'a.e• _� r�• •,l• ! • 40 ,. a ,,' ;,, *� ,�-:•'�.'r, .. '' ��,�.\•a ..i. •a -r•P; � „• •� ..q:• i' !�• ., ,.. .::Sw .. ... '•:' '"•art, ' XI FW AL 0000000000 •t' ' " • 900000WOOO ,a 0000000000 0000000000 � �� •� ,�, � �• � . ' •• •• •', ' r a� � � � OOOOOB0000 d000mO000O �� •. , •' ' 0000000000 4 oOOm®o0o4:v0 ' • •• OOdOQOOQ00 � ', . �� •' ., ' 000OOd0000 • s • �� ' :••!•, L, • 0000000000 f mot. • it � � •. •.I. t� ' ". � '• ' •, ' 0000000000 .'• OOOOOQO00 . • , ° . 004000000r i •. � •ratrrRtlrr•a...rr . , � i Ot'30dmO0®d0 •`r' .......�....�..« - - ' d000dgOOd� m00®d000dm + •. ••f� sw�w Sane MI•Ns M9M� •• • r. OOOOOS10000 • � •..' .: OmQf�Of7r9©m0 r :. .r e,.. mmmdesdmdmm - •• • ,�: F• seloomma r wwmmm eiNwauso �rw.rr. .�. . •,:.• ..:_. •.r...; ..•, MASTER SITE PLAN {,�-:1,.:,:" ":. M I S C A Y N E PLAZA - - •;; . � .. ' ,• ' ",s :. ' r. �a` ,{• ter, '�:'-;, -6 . OF:• �� >ifitil IC.t�r•'a• ..�,• ,fr. �:..��: .:j:{1•`_1�R~ `i: r• •r •f • .•l ••l:���.�". .. �•.. •.:w:'.E ; ram• At . : �' �r dell jl •'\ •ate .'v ; J . y' . y, . . ' 1 ` BISCAYNE PLAZA SOUTH ELEVATION • . � M r�� rr�� • Irk r�nw orb � .. �� 1 •� �- �r • ~r•w •"on • is r.or tiop trM w ..p-. - F J •� ` �� A�4+ �MrwA.�.. _-1 �� _ 1rr *Pa. •w • N rrr oftm. ft >fYMr :S. lrnra FIGURE 4 'CLIFM FDOT DESIGN FOR TIAE 1-0 DOWOIMII DISTRIBUTOR INRAICATM RAW SYSTEM ®0 t I49 t YI • ® Its BE 2ND sT. III g i � ' loll Ana— Jk .% SOUTHEAST V1WJC At G[Mi[N Y I cAeAc[ AOp nETAII AST 13mKIA1l ' • t + A� SE- s RAO surn A ae• 1 1' � w••• •wr .• ss '' f �'l � i 1 � • I 0 0s0"NE-tk-ve — i $ ' DUPONT PLAZA F"DTEL . - : FDOOT. I FRIIR a —A%"TYTj .0�—c FIGURE 5 DOVWHOM ALTEMAIM � DOMTOM 05 RHIHOR BRA-CATM RAW SYSIBA 11 lim 1! .000 a owns -of lilt' Mill- mor a. it Fl- cm"w V C-7 S 3m $1RUN L Mm stow pubwe soft 0000 .0 �am maw lie PG ------------- own somemom ARM goal somm"Maim 0488 ,AV S, a "Pas as 91WAgo SaWavem ogre" FF"GSCD oowtnowpd DEVTLOPF*ml AUTIOMTV ALTHINATME OUST PLAZA STIES SE 351. — 501104 RAW AL rtast"I ♦ wxglo"m M"VfLopwml FIGURE 6 PROPOSED APPUCANTS MODIFICA11ONSTo THE 1-95 8 MANQ THE 3 AMM APPLICANT RECOMNENDED ImpROVENfl NTS til I . ;1 c 0 64 WE • n VI .,:�•:rr..vH N I� LA H tt) C, „• rt 4 n13 :1rwwC9�: ►+ f1 D to N A ISA Na re K a e A • a A M M M . - r• R tt ra •1 t,) O •7 O r• 1 ►i O rr O Vf •-1 n 1a r) �t '� ri ra '•• n U •n •r t, 7 ;� fi � 7s M O O' n J O • tt -t .n 4e n n. 1a :J t+ C) r 0 H C r/ (1 to G r1 r: 11.0 n IA r► t) N i tre 'Xi N /'• • 1 q H /'• A •t) r: n ' . ? t) to Z, ra pe . y -r ►w •t u ►+ tl IN 0 b A fJ d J ra ►1 H O A t'1 Co t• rt M A rw A O N n CA ►1 O C, A t1 ►• [=. r1 " n O J rn ►- -j 7.- ' r /• a o 0. rt u a 7• N ri " •1 to H 411 fa m r) O t r/ :1 H H `< fl 1 N ►t ►% •t fJ 1-• O a to n u o r/ n n ►u n ., to is rt A U IS -rJ rf n ►n N :r O• `4 O 7• u r► A n e H • •t C N 0. 4: A r to CL 1® ra rt ra tJ ra r N W M O �N *a K O .w0 O n nvo— t-• (a• R M ri IA •1 C en rf " •'1 rf c w • A H O A T O Y1 C n O u n. O 4; to . � 9 •t c•a o 0 o n 7C•p.G 1`+ w $-- $I r. � n A rt c vt c ra A — Za C6 Z: h t-• r O n A n p :r 1-- U '[a A K fa r 0. N O rt Y O 1 O sa 1+ . III A 0. O ti N a t1 A rt .n p- C •:! N P. O O :3 iL rt ? t71 W - co rr 7 •< 1Y rr C O W A Is c rt C6 O• to c r► ►I c 10 W O O C O c 0 4: rf A C W rs 1-• 0 7 fa Vs W CI C w I's ta. f7 :r N J rt 1-• O• O VA A rt w • rf W M N i1 re N A 1a O 10 =r • A A X t/ t7 ht t'a C H O t* .t ►y fa 1+ 1-1 1••• O A to h n N I-• tx n 1-+ O n C r O A tV O O A O• C A O O• O K to C6 t l• -O Y 1+ A. /J 1•• ►i tr W M J 1+ A 1+ ! ► r"J ■1 n n M r � . M C. cs. 0. n r+ ►-• 7 O t9 rs A O O r tb n t•I H r r r4U O �O O �+ W rf oo O- o C to ri ri ra n re O =1 • Co ra t:a ra R ra O 1 to 0-1 O' ►- O fa O ve V n• 1 •I tJ H H t:a H H r1 A O Y• C H C1 A .0 n H N C: N►• H H :S W r ►•+ 17' • to 0. A 4 Vf .0 n t-• d N r •! A G N 97 0 K A/ t O O C O C- tD v n ra :r C rt rt n O A h C ct H 9 t+ -O C1 to n W p W ra d tL -O t1 [yj ►) rf O is n n W n O. n O- n h -v r •r!a m rao3 rt ra ra r ••f A m 1-+ O •-• ? O tY C H r A 11 tr rt r+ ra Of-•t fa C n O n tJ' O V a O w ►! in < 4: r O O r, to M N a to O M s r •►a c r v r•• 0 .: o rt to a a x rt 0.0 rt to 1-• ra A ra u n O n r+ =1 r/ p n 7 h H :1 •: n" A 7 O W :; :a "1 ►• n .) r. t% ►n O /r rs ►0 to rn A • A H• O .A :a• n O J 1 1& M O rf n O > •t r: c ►+t n ►{ 00 1.1 r O• •J Pa H N O O. rt O t-O r ra :rrt H• . rt • i • C N O. O. n W C 7- n r Cc :3 ri O a O O• C 10 r W 1• 1i 0 M %A to 0 f a rt Ca. 4: n C rt W 1+ • N CL n O a :r 7' r1 0 a Cl) w. o1 O n •1 n O o r► ti r ra x 6 a. 91 n •-s n n rt O 11 ►1 "1 O K 0 O r rt o G c N 61 to N r M M A X- C n- ►t O• W 'J O n U rf r/ O K 10 fa si t-. t/ t-• 0. rir/ rt O o to to a ►n rf O I-►-.: O �D :s•rM1-•n rn n M M n I n W 1-• v a" r n n n S O - n i• A '•s 4: n N o n v " 0 n A6 n IS 0 0. O r► O < "1 ►1 r1 ri a c G n :r9 ri •1 rn - • G a: ri n rl 5 •1 P n C .O 0 ?C rt I) r r n n O r n O ti rt rt O N t• ri G 0 0 t, ►1 J :r ti ►► i O G O' 1 M A n i1 n rt ri re n M 0 w O A rf 1 v n to .. r. t•- o :r t• 00 0-1 `< n to J fi O Ia ri n n •i ri to V o• A c .j .. • n rf W • `1 ►t r � 7 u s ~ •� r • b1 t, C6 rlN t-• rt f9 ►1 us 01 v •t n fl "7 ra t•) r► � n fl c A r / sye Y •" I ont0 rs O >r � En to tA )q, a+ a •r to t! t0 CO roe � a • a rn- w �• O A M n z 1 a n r1 n a W ate•- tom. O W 9 � � 7 •tom+ ^ s rs rs a N tt.•7a 1+ n � n ►� O ra to < r •'te 1••t 171 •. _• n C t, _I n • a u. fl uoo�ecl+oca' 3ttcles Tomes Acecls ctaspelllas iseeoA Sceelot Citrus raredisls felsaools tp"Net Acscb feraeslese Ismael, scociN Citrus roticelstM toisseels fsyegi Aehisa tspts iSgopllsi Ctssts roses I1011ch 411s1 AcealorrMgMe .rlCAtll f►serNts Vale. Coo tons pie! Corcoloss dlverslfolla tplyeas Pled Arsc strss rosssaotflesese 49asse Peps! Coccolass grsadifters Illd Isa/ we 1prpel Avicessis prsleess lelseM smWeq! Caeeatosa avl/ors 13e9 lrasep srnselo sctisopMlfb tStM/Hers! CaccotMrase argesfsla Ificrlds sorer Palsl %coda eecoress IlioeR olive) CoeMlostarsee Oflllollm flef9ercp fro*) sesers slesreYs lGeMo tlebi Cocos swifsrs %" Irsn•s Ifpel )SO twosat Palso sells eo►ffsts Mode Vale) iaaocartus orectas Isuffaeemdf j� GIIIsslrs bsesatocetbfe 1 � lbedMp)sti! e Casoesrleg sreeles serltsss 1313rsr tieftaaeoodl GNislesss elltdess itraet bttlebrsabs Cordes saesifesa fGstgsr Creel GIIHtesos $0.e Isot►IskesAf Ceseils Ildaspe reuse iflsgal ®olseleest . slaterasa tried cfasesool Orlletss isferIllors lGolses elasi Gssb flsfels• tColaes sbw/ triebtrTs 'slea/css /Qa 1 Coles pesfssdre ICelbl • ErltAas crtsts•4e11919 ICacMsper es►ep•trooi t7vwsedorsa sp. IHoesMoid NIMt Eels esllperis•Ishtte slotiNs/ 2 C 4OWrots IN Mllpiss lEeroPeoo fM isle, repels eespete the stoppers/ 3 Csorlsls tfncloss Most ells troop repels. lost)/s Issalsh staelerst 40 CMrysslldocerses leteuesss fArace;sle. hsdapeca► Valet tic" elfrlfalle #Short lose fill m Z TsoMTlles ollrllorse pSNisbsf: Gravities bsMsll IssNs lrwifisaf Cores serasflfollss Ivey hasp •.i R , k z� r r, GrevlllN roWnte ISflh Nil sere large free, Not for reflalestlsl Ilse. • Gealaa:us sasNln IlIVwm-wltaol Itax casslae look o will Jacaranda scef l tsl lee I JecraaNl Jnalperes slllielcole ISaaaatbwn red coders Itrovlod- deal forreeo flow l Or@ owds lo4erstroaals Indlcae Itrapo-Mlrtlss ls9esPolaris rolsmese 1whits xomfflwsl ucrls trlasdre IGoll Ila:erfal ticwls grasdlse iticosle palm$ ticesls sPP•a Iticoals point triloas bahoasasis IWIld tsrlwl lTsllons leflsllque IMlid fawisriwl Mallbrs behwssls 110114 411111 wstichodfsdra a Ieef ldlssimus llbstlel Mlsa hybrldse Illaesal llrrlcs crllre Molira sea wrtlol Prilesoalo scolostae IJrasolem thorn$ Thorns Peslophorde llaaaraaae bellow poloclonas Palos clans* Isasd plaal ►IMas silted! Islash plans Plans 91110011 war. tribes I" sloes pilot Plsclde plscipnlas #Jamaica dogendl � r/saw!* lossltolle 181o11p1 Plwrla.spp.e l�rss�lponll Pel"Closs pofchw. 10vart pollaaclws Pseedophce-In srgentll ISIorlde chw l pslN MtKbwiMnee ofea;aa•s Isestrome Palms Plyciospersa mecar"Wil IllscArthor Palau 9oercos virstaloo ILIve ask) IMIIooma oasgls Itted oagroaael UoTstoaos ®late Iftyal Palo) Ilorstoaea reg/o ICotan rots) pato1 Sabel p81Nl90 (Came" Palos Seessos repass ISua polseffol Shwoube glance Iprsdiss treat Solateals mah"941 Illest Indies mMAp go Tobasto orgentese fares of gold) Tabebole pallides Irish frontlet frsel TowrlaKas ladlcae Iladls 7"wlndl Tornlnalle COW99 ITrovocal stands tsatoglewa li'+�ssss Thesposis populaaeee lP rtlo Tres, esselds mebapol Twlaa marrlsi/ Mingo !belch paint Theisen pwvlllers /Thatch Wait Thrown radial* fflorldo thatch paint Theisen sapp. Match Palo/ washlastor robasfa Illashlostos palms NET. lactic species It !9owrces WPM s W469, gust ad Wyead tarty! - Castaa sty. /Spiral fiyt ' 1112""k-4 kerttwaoeme false aTNlat " Acalypke klsolbf ICMaillo plant! Ibiosoesf siscaso Iveralsk loots Acalypko eleiroslamas fcapparpNft yarbe" aellickli iplsk bell) Alotasls *pp. IEiopNot owl Eraatbdrae aeraosesss 121e8 sgsl Aipiale on. ISkall to Ee9ee11! 40111809 Ifhifa sf"Wf Aeaaleos Itorck piapori - Eayaale coats IIlad Merry/ ANlsle Cremate IMIskm k"I Eogaata tog/ids ISpsalsk step$arl ►eats [""is votalias ISpamisk Stilt . Asoor"s "P. i ftwe" twat Earestisre sagragata It'torltla prttetl lopwlo s$p.• iRai kyoalat tsrdeale jesafnoldess ISerdwbl tMsacaraas recarwto I$flq-fal/l Caylra eiscalor Pilo/ly/ }, Ibagalew111as fpp. lemmlMsltiNi 1 ibarag Hesaile $signs Iscarlotbask. Ilrobasks d hostels ecttaopkylfa IscWtol ral Iledtckian coraeor➢aa Islrftertly sll/yt browning lacids (tocestkerryl ItNtcklee t/swag 1"16130e 11117/ CaM mero kaerstocs$kela Ift"is eoff Ilsiteklow $arowrI~ laksli /tills Cafficarpa americans (Americam MNtOf*) tisetekloe spp. 9Ctanter illly9 Campsfa rNlcamss ftraapat stop) Ilsilarflala llylIlls itNeck samfteeert Castle pp.g ICosslol Mlkltces rose Iftesslss Itllbistegl Cassis Mkpoarslss Musiai Nfaaamills Isiltelias ISpide► MITI CMysakaiamrs Icace ICocoplool Ilea ®fabrss fAalfle►rtl Cladfam fSogressl Iles vaelforls saws lovgrf isaI Mfly$ CuAlgow warlgetws ICrotawl Ipoaaes no. 111srsimg 91orlss. railroad visas Cmaacorpas arvetas /Crave bsifoaaoadl Ira fracleascams IWO elders Comocar$es arectas saricaas fStfrer buttenamtdl Iwo Imbricate fSoacomst aersm old") r Jocgrinl• martens/a /doavooi/ e±. 11 Ir fesdls sreloots IRewdls. Iblte Indian 6W11 Steins Is sptentrlewells Itlarling Vlenl S"ltterle lArredmWl Sceesole ®laelerl tlMNrrT/ Selr,ns 1®elresssl SCOW& toowotose 191etllece pd1 Stenoloblum stews® Ivellor etderl Ssrlens earltlas is" Ceder/ Tecaeerls Cpewsls !lips bweysecklel Tenodless ICyaress/ Tetonerls Cpewels hate lioneyseetilol TotreayUls ®lcolor 1letresySla, vast India* IIle1 TAesa/er,ls erects• 1Rlnys • Montle) 1UeMerdls sp.e ICIoC3 sine) Teyrollls Slows Ilh7raills) Trocholospereve jeselwoldess mentederste joeelesl Unlele denlselsts ISee oats) dlternme sesyewsmoe ISewdewsme •1borwMl Tecce eleptient)Res ISpleeless Tom$ feels tlerldewe ICeontle) PowtRo Im loser• Ivlld heel RM a tool is sMies Sources St1i�C 11 1' 0 1 26• C;. sist7tn�ttt SUNS NION CONWANr I(! ., MIAMI. It()1k10A W31 .. AOSI 3?1 •e:Og e., • •,t, rt•, ;..• » '' .: i ' M ems: ° . t..... 1 d • - ,' _/T7�lil' .tit: .�' 1' '•'" • - n . HOLYWELL •- Mr. Howard Cary •,• • .. :. •~� _ .. City Manager 7? �? .. .: •:.. :: :. o:.:. - CITY OF MIAMI .. �. ..... • �' • _ - 3300 Pan American Drive _; :�• ":'� •�+ /t�g'sq Miami, Florida 33133 - ,.� r - • . •p: - Dear Mr. Cary:. :.. p _ .,' •.: • ..:, •b- f�'c ' - • - The Holywell' Construction Com�an;•'aiid Mr. Thet�doce Q:sGould': s •_' �• -d"Developer's hereby submit for your eons:Jeration the' followin*­'.proposai' for the temporary use of the south -end Band .hell Area of 8ayfront Park. .' . 1. The City of Miami ("City") grams to Leveloper tl::: exclusive use of the. Bandshell area of Gayfr•.nt :Park as cialined on Exhibit •=?=� ::... ../.A°� attached hereto. . • .' • ... ._. *..: - ... . . 2. Developer agrees that no "batch•ns plant" will be erected on said - property, and that the property will be used to park construction _- - trailers and parking for the emplo;•.etes of Developer, its - Contractor, sub -contractors, afti iates and related entities. -' 3. The term of this Aercement shall commence on 3uly I, 1931 and end on February 28, 1982, both dates inclusive. = `�. - _.. a• In consideration thereof, Develo; 2r agrees to: ' �.. -- (a) Pay to the City a monthly sum of Five Thouw-nd Dollars ($5,000), said sum to be paid to the Trus. Account �= : established for the Redevelopment of Bayfront Park; (b) Pay all costs for the demoletion and r; moval of the existing _ Dandshell; e ?_^-= -- •• —_ " (e) Allow the eoMintied opera ion of the paiking lot loi:ated on ' _ - ISio : • : ' cl Z of Dullunt Plaza; ' • '-- '� -' (d) .Fence the perimeter of -aid 1landshell area and provide security persaimel to pats 11 said area 'on a full-time, 24- -' — • four -day basis; i�e�►•eti• r • ••/•rI A..y'•-► e_� �• •r'.I• N► I .1. '/�.•. • L-.i.•� ., .• • • t..•• •t •• -. �•• i l `. - N• • s. - The Developer further agrees that: (a) No trees will be removed from the Park area except as _ may be necessary to demolish the Bandsliell; _ . ' (b) No part of Biscayne Boulevard or Biscayne Boulevard Way ' - . will be closed to public traffic, except, when necessary, • • • those portions where easements exist to install or service ' • .. - •• •- -:utility lines, storm sewers, telephone equipment and such ' • ;_� other under -street work as may be necessary from time to •� • _• ••. r. • time. 6. The •City of Miami and •Developer agree to enter Into 'negotiations for the funding of a fountain .In the _pr,u4posed Noguchi Park. In the event an agreement cannot Oo rched ' - �osz regarding the funding ofsaid fountain, Developer caei:es, that, �- subsequent to the expiration of the Agreemetnt; ' artd at the ' request of the City, it will sod the area described hqsein. _ Upon your acceptance of this Agreement, Developer and''City will be bound by the terms outlined above, for the term herein specified. Sincerely yours, •��_ ;, �•: v: — -r• HOLYWCLL CONS T RUCTION COMPANY ; By: �•� •. - - 1.. • _ _• •r •. - .. Theodore S. Gould _. Agreed to and Accepted: TCSY: _ City of MiamiC17Y C4£Rn .c ._._.4. . i 1• ••1 . •.. i.• ...... I.:.��: By; a....- -: oward Gary ` City Manager/� •• , a;v I•ttc i.i . :- y • A-12 *R�w.. ��i-•. i • '�y1 •�-�ti �r•'� -•+Si • •e« •,��:• �• �,.�:�C';�s•"�.,'TI�'�t:►+i•?rrt��!'�=.i.r. "_s.: �<r.�. mil.' . n s 4 .. • "Otyw1St CO( .1A11ON d MiAmI. FLOR1OA 33131 HOLYWELL _. ._• July 20, 1992 Honorable Mayor Maurice Ferre CITY CF MIAMI 3300 Pan American Drive P. O. Box 330708 s. hil ami , Florida 33133 5 _ Re: BAYFRONM PARK } Dear. Nlayor Ferret . i° • I have recently reviewed the most current Nobuchi design for Bayfront Park and, in general, agree with the overall plans, Including the moving or removal of the existing library building. This letter is to inform you• that I am prepared to provide the materials and to construct that portion of the Noguchi design -- adjacent to Chopin Plaza in the south end of the park. However, this commitment to provide the materials and construction is contingent upon the City moving forward with its plans to redevelop Bayfront Park and some modifications to the performance Plaza at. the south end of the Park, which modifications woulu be subject to.our mutual agreement and approval. Sincerely, _ eadore 1%. Gould — Presid�l�t -. _. Xc:1 30e Carollo - Vice t.4layar Camnissioner ikdratrio Perez Com►issioner 3. L. I'lunror _ Carrmissione r Ml Iler IU-Ains• ' Roy F. Kenzie Wiwi ito A Nvc1apre•rit. Author i ty .. _ A-13 �� 'i 1'�'i.�•.•�•� aAi�ia�it�ii-•=tsL•• • • .i , u. r '• - .. .. .. ,.,.' .. ti . .. t ._w•. �,%►•j}�;t��.�t:'. •� t.�!TS'iNhi'S�!::e.�•;a oar•:�:1�ik'a••'��,•�tr:•i.j�.er...•..a�•�.r .fir -, ... y i i •f 4 i# T of Pin, A. fewfle MC P.O. son 20 May 1985''f se.•s,w *ggw d Cie Jk. Mr. Theodore Gould, General Partner Miami Center Limited Partnership 300 Miami Center 100 Chopin Plaza Miami, Florida 33131 • Dear Ted: The Miami City Commission is presently considering whether or not to proceed with the present plans for the redevelopment of 8ayfront Park. These plans would involve the removal of the former library building and the.full development of the iioguchi plan. At our last meeting, Commissioners expressed concern.over the amount of private fends committed to the redevelopment effort since the funds raised to date fall far short of those needed. In 1982, during an earlier debate over the fate of the former library building, I attempted .to indicate to the Commission the scope of private sector commitments to the park redevelopment progra,n. I read into the record your letter of July 20, 1982, which indicated that you were, "prepared to provide the materials and to construct that portion of the Noguchi design adjacent to Chapin Plaza at the south end of the park." -This commitment was contingent upon the City moving forward with its plan. Your w M ingness tc assist us in our funding and construction e marts, of course, cam4 after several meetings with the designer and staff who altered their designs several times prior to meeting with your approval. The City has altered its plans for the south end of the park to complement the Miami Center project and we would now like to proceed with implementation. A lot of progress has been made in funding Bayfront Park and we are much closer to our goal of full funding. I need your help now in moving this project forward. Although you have taken no action to date on your offer to assist its with park development, we would hope that you would now come forward to help make this project a reality. The Miami City Commission will hear this matter again on May 23. Your willingness to honor your Commitment would go a long way in helping us realize this crucial project. Sincerely, • IAU4 Oi/I� CA_rice A. Ferre n- cc:. Commission Nemberd �r •; �_ _..i..,,,.:... S. Pereira �T�1 • �sw.+�.�r�Jai:�.,,-NiN�•. •R V•�ar...f•�wrrr�•.: � r.: . .t HvLYWELL CORPORATION r.u. D,..x 6279 Chariot t,-w�•ille. Virginia :.''�I►u�i '?:►►i l I t (� � h� ni l usu•112"95-71'':, l'h�trluttcseillc. Vit-ginia '__Bull , May 199 1986 Ethan P. Minsky, Esq. Shea 6 uould �!• 114a Brickell Aventue Miami, Florida 33131 Re: Bayfront Park Dear Ethan: "� It has been brought to my attention that the City Planning Deoartment's recommendations for the Amended Development Application concerning Wirth h Co.'s proposed Biscayne Plaza project to be developed as the contract purchaser of the remainder of the land on Tract D include $1,0009000 for improvements in Bayfront Park. 1 understand that it has been alleged that Holywell Corporation and I agreed to contribute $1,000,000 to the redevelopment of Bayfront Park. This allegation is false as the attached correspondence and transcripts of City Commission hearings indicates. Holywell's obligation was limited to providing sod for the bandshell area. It is my recollection that in January, 1983, when Holywell Corporation proposed to resod the bandshell area, Mr. Gary sent me a notice specifically instructing Holywell to refrain from placing sod in the bandshell area. The so-called $1,000,00U contribution does not exist. In July, 1982, Holywell offered to provide the materials .and to construct the portion of the Noguchi design adjacent .to Chopin Plaza .as a philanthropic tax deduction proposal, subject to the City of Miami proceeding immediately witn its plans to redevelop Bayfront Park. Four years nave elapsed and conditions have changed. Holywell does not have a need for tax deductions. Moreover, Holywell does not have an interest in Miami. Si / ly y urs, Theodore B. Gould fm Attachments cc: Russell Wirth Sergio Rodriguez Miller Dawkins t+� �1 ATTACHMENT 3 . C009 FOR WASTE TYPES COMMONLY ASSOCIATED WITH EACH SIC 1NDL•sTsv A Waste pesticides • Washing and rinsing solutions containing pesticides C topty pesticide containers 0 Spent tosaphene solutions or sludges grog dipping E Spent pesticide solutions or sludges other than 'toxophene iron dipping F Oust containing heavy metals C Washings and rinsing solutions containing heavy moo is N Wastewater treatment sludges containing heavy metals ►� I Waste ink .I Ignitable paint wastes containing flammable solvents (flash point less than 1400F), K Liquid paint wastes containing heavy metals (cadmium, chromium, mercury or lead) L Spent solvents N Still bottoms from the distillation of solvents M Filtration residues from dry cleaning operations 0 Cyanide wastes ! Strongly acidic or alkaline wastes p Spent plating wastes R Waste ammonia S Photographic wastes T Ignitable wastes (flash point less than 140'F) V Wastewater sludges containing pentachlorophenol, creosote. or • arsenic V Waste formaldehyde W Load -acid batteries : x Waste explosives Y Waste oil } 2 Other f: i A-15 i I . LIST OF MMOTIAL NAZANOOO! WASTE CNEUVOi1S ST ftC fODL0 o1C spite tepee s*se-Iptive Gr1@ I111S-sfoS: ACBICBLTMI: s11S Ase Corm sill AK Coltve sell ABC Tobacco 0111 ABC Samoa Cross sib! AMC vegetable old iFlee Pereore sees ABC start Caere sift ABC Citroe Frait Cra"rs sill ABC ornaunlel plaricaltaro a Ibroety preferle sill ANC Comoro$ forty. Priestley Crop qli AK Beet Cattle Feedlots sill AK lees Cattle. escort Feedle/s 1*.s., saectssl e114 ABC sheep osd Cost fares sill ABC Casette Liseelech moll ABCT Soil Peoperation stroleee else am Crap Flatus. C*Itivative. aeo protective !sill LFWT Crop sorsestins. Priestley by Ilachlee ell• 1 Cotton Cisaime Pat AT coastal Crop services Me A Livestock $*twice*. eaept torvleas for Amlest spocialllits slot A Les and Card** Serels*s sill At Oreeeestai Shra► ad fret services s/li-soll: 101esT111 all AK timber Tracer all ABC relate 0erseries l trot SW Catherl*$ e Istractiss all Alit Polestrr services 1611-I19$: C00SINK11011 1611 Lem silk"? ad Street Constructive 1612 LFWR oridle. Ismael. ad Masted Milkmoy Ceeet relive fill FI ti Aiso. Ileatie$ (escort 11krtric) and Air Conditissist spot JILT palatial. Paper seosle$. and @*estate*$. MsvF Constractionl, KC 1161 LT ?@close*. Tile. Usable. sod Mosaic Mott Its? JILT fleet Loriog aid other ►lonta.erk. NIC Reach I vote' hot Mee ldestllled me a "tastiol segtrotoe of hosordowe was go the basis that the isdvettf "I stooret* cottesive. reactive. ilaitNle. sad/s,t logic wastes. for tgeorse. SIC code 0111. Soil Fropotetlow, Services. Is o to!!stiet generator of tonic pesticide ease@*. cock SIC code listed is, labor 1 Aoiprprssae•sir here documented is ton lit*gatwot as a Leo/enlist $peorelor of bterdeas waste. IrK stet elsrwbree classified f a SIC Code Valle trpfe �. Mafiptien 1161 Lt B"Iios and !hest !Iota@ Uwe III) LT Class mod Clodiss Wotk 1194 LfWT taceva/ ass a" Faa"se iee Verb list JILMT special Trade Conaraslols 1012-19": MA@@PAC'7MINC 'INMI$113 all Case" Speeieatioa lMl Cant! and Cocoa fish and ssatoeds live L"I @toad Ilaese Psbric alilla. Wall llil IN Vows* tall L@nstk OW tare 11"ier? lass In* Negiety. oscept Vases°a Fvil Least% A, Sees, Least sill L11 soil oulseweat Mavis ilia Lot Roil 11detwear 116113 list IN Cellular Anil Fabric 316118 l!s@ L11 Warp soil faint smells lass IN laittios heals, WC sal 1" riaitbra of Brood 'lases IACJCe of =after llil Lie Fietshers *f Bused bares fabrics of "be -'hit rite$ aid Silo ills VI Pisish*ts of Bread 'saves labeies, V1ae-11ods libel mad Sig® fill sal time* Carpels and ems, . slat Lie tailed Carpels .sad suss lips 4.4 Carpets a" aass, SIC 2414 JILT load oieckss Cabisots 3431 JILT Nmrdarood Tesler and Fll"od salt JILI Soltvoad Vega*$ aid 717aea0 2411 JILT Motile lanes sill JILT Feelobeicsn*d bad saildiase mad Camplesomoe sill s Wood Fr*serviag 1492 LIT Pact icl@bosea Me JIL"It Woad seesebold torailarce. oagove 'slpholsleged slit, NLMQ Now tlaosehald fursitete Illy. Jam NOW TV ail audio cabioots ills J1101 MwsMold facaitort. RIC Isis Jli"lt we" office fsraitasa loll 111.06 F steel office lstnilure Me JBLMT Wad partitions mod listaaeee lei! 11LIK F@ Metal Partitions sad Fisteree loll LNFTT Nov 1141Is � 1621 LMFII raper ~ills. sent", Bwildias ys"t'"tl319 loll LMFIT Pepertaaed Minis 3"1 ILP Perot Cooties god 9384100. ! 2641 fir Bass. Incept UAW* Does !KS 11.1, Bar -Cal slays sad Papo'beecd Jed caodbooai jt lbab UP Ftoserd mad atsld@d poi' cool a , 2 lA.l ILP Coagettrd favor sad a'a*.e1008e4 iT,Aycl 1. sail Ott P•ldaes Palooboaed ar.ars lAl: ILP Srt-wV Pepreboaed ,eon®+► 26%) 1%t cdetwsa4r4 sad $alad.pabre leas, Is *IC • not elerwhoto elossitirA �'� pilIII 719[1111i1l''„�I+3i A ISM • fit Mss1a tqe/ Nf$e�lp/iao cod* } 16% ILPT Sonirery raw coneslorre loss levy Pibet Case. tells. •elms. sea Similar hedecto 1661 LNITT /uildial Paler and Oeildisl aasad Mille loll 0111,01,10 Nruspopere: hbiishiwg and Palatial I1s1 NILtMg Ieriodic$Is. %bliabial A Iriatiol I111 NIL01Q hsas: ►obrlisbial sod hioting Ills NILIIPO lsaa treating sill NILWQ Commercial trlatiog. Letterpress ad Scr**N lass NILpPQ :Oww rclol Prlaileg. Lithographic lisp NILO►Q 1188revial and plate relating Risk NILOPQ Ca wecial Palatial. clamor* 1161 NILO►Q Manileld Believes farms Trio NILOPq Creating Card 1u►liahiag sill NILOPQ Illsob►eeae. Looseltal Siodere. sold Devices soft N1L0►1 loobbindial ell alleged Valk : sill NILOPQ Typeselsise salt T Alaalisi a" Chlorine silo to" Inorganic Pi/lest• Till for"ST lodestrial laerlssic clNleals. KC list LKIT ►lastic@, Waterloo*, sysibetir Nesins, all Non-aoecosiaa►if Ilootemarr* Till LNTT Syatb*tic Robber ills Lull CIIJYIasit Use -halm Iibars lino LNTT synthetic Orgssic fibers, Incept Cllimlasle sale Biological Prdocto 1 1111 pedicisals sad B*tsmicals v 11 K L► Phermactutical Preparation$ IKI ►L111'f coop and Other feterlests. *steel fp*tislltp - Cleswero 1141 ALMM Specialty clamor#. hlisbes, and Sonl/aIlan Icporsl ions 1" I PLIM lerface Active Agents. Plolehlog Agoot*. Sollemsted oil$. sad Assistont* Tlla rLTT Follows. Cosmetics. and Other Toilet Preparations less FCLNrt Poise and Allied Product* 1861 LWIT Cam and Wood Chemicals 146S T Cyclic (Coal ter) Crudes, so/ Cyclic Ister"Alsese. Offs. and Organic ►ilm$ata ILsaae and toners) IKO &MTV lwdoetrial Organic Chemicals. NEC sell Nitrogenous Fortilistre s//• AK Pesticide and Aaricelteral 0- mlcals. Nit Tell Adhesives old Sesienle : lets Implosives lots PCLNP elimtis$ ism - Till LNUPIV Chemical Preparations 1 loll T /•coleus Wising : loss T &@pimp Fella *d tootiegs loop T Lubrkgeliwe Ail• owd Comsers silt T reodoclo of Petroleum awl tool, NIc r• rapt JIJIT 1e98c•llaeewe Pleslic Pgdects CAI loll L Lrsgher Tanning sad rimiabeog t Net *Mot ela•uhrro coog aef•rd sit Vesta Ty/rs Cescri/tiem Code, V sill L feats a See tar 31orb g Makes less L L•sebea Clervev a "•tires 1144 L hoses'• reeteese. *Sept Athletic Ilol L Lenasgr site L Vaaen's lswAbago 1 Formes 111: L /esoowal r.eath•a Seals 1149 L Leather tends, mac sill rt flat Class MI JCL erieb sod Slroel-oral Clan We M 11 JIL Ceramic Vail tied 92oaa Jila list J/L Vierfews Coins Plumbia•/ rintasee sad gsel0oree Acceo®seism MR JCL Willows China °able and titc%va Aeliclas 1:61 JCL Fine Eegibeaoar• ishit•••aeei '?all. 3 3t•ggh•w Articles l:bt, JCL Parcflata I3ecCrical Sapplit3 s:st JCL hater/ rrodoc3s. Itc gal T Abrasive produc3s 131 LT Caskets. partial and 3raliws Somicps )III T glass Forestal. steel Stalls, "a sell )*$ mill,, sell T Elect ro olsollsescal rasJocts ills T steel Witt Orwgw$ and Steal ilailg awl 304123 1114 T Cold 10e11r4 151003 3hrrt;'Strip. awl /ors Ills T Steel ripe ant lobes 31:1 T Crap Igoe rwe•dg ifs 31:2 t Nalloshle loon 1e0e.1r3es 11?S T Slops Fwwdria, mtr ills T trimery Sall/air sod S•limisl of Lead Me) T Primate Sor3limq and S•lewiag of 3tnc 1314 T Primsry Prodecgiow wl 43ew40w pill T Priosry Seeelring seal 3013siws of xee•fr33agea Nreals. SIC Isbl T ftcodagp 3oarlrieg anA '711"salmi ,f 3�am1e33.ee0 Intro/r )111 NLg11N/Qf galling. lrwiag Sad ImlgediwF at Copper sell NL!NefgT Alogiwem Shre9, Plate sad aoi'I 33% KNMaF Alosie•es Intended flredocts sell. N111mi Alemioeo sell jog and! OOaviag. KC )lab Ntmrgw gallie/. Dramas awe 131e04i" of 31swfveree% 04101. Incept Copper ,and Alwasoom list 01110M Orwisg and 3684381ins of 3hwlers"s Wire 3161 T Alosinem Faawdrits Itaotiol33 eta: T stage. Usage. 'Copper and tapper to e Allen rooedries slat t Oooforlses romadtios Icaslisgsi, 31It 3It8 NtnnrQT Nr163 Cleat 4rrat awe slot N1llIM Priaaery 3letal 1`70jocil. Aft' • tall aLgh•rgv mega$ Law• Sol! NLt1WQV Nr1a3 Sh•Ppiwa lage•l%. Atoog, l•,ya. and ►silt /Anus trliwgab•n¢3 Iasi a]tedaq coal log 0 ago - ao• •l u.•Ae.. .i...• •.a t I sic Most• 1yp06 Description 1611 01111110911 Nana and use tests, Incept Machine fast* sed Need Sarre 161% 1MJIDPQI now Saw 6 Same BlsAss 162e MINIM Mardwor*. sic tall fimrQ inserted Iron and totes SMllerp Mare tall 'MIl11MQ1 plumbing Plate#* Fittings sea trim losses leads) 1411 NLADFQT Mesties Equipment. estope Ilectfie ass Mar* Air Fotmorse 3441 SIJIOFQT robficatto Sttsctsrel motel laal MUIrgQT "flat Bases, seek. flaws. Melding*, end trim 3661 Kneirip Fabricated Flue Nark 1446 NUIDPQT Meat "at Meet 3446 nmere QT Architectural and or"ewlsl Motel week 1461 NLN"91 Prefabricated Israel Buildings and ee"oate 1469 MLMOFQT miscellensass Metal Mork list NUIOFQT Strome Machine Fredecto 16s1 MLMOPQT sells. Mute. screws. siu*ase me mea nt@ 1461 NLMDFQI lees and Steel Forgiags 166% MLMDPQT Automotive Stsyiegs 1669 ULMO QT Metal Stampings, Nit 1411 O M NI tlectropletieB. ►ellalese Psmtleg. Asedieisge sea Calories 3619 MLMDFQT Casting. tagrasieg. sed Allied Urviete. SIC 1401 Seals Arms Ammusitien • 1611 Awwallies. *scope for leell Am* Mac > 1469 Ordesece ad Accessories. wC 1111 IMM" Sloss. Cos. sea Nldrealic Tnrble*s re•, pp 1S1e MIIMMQT Internet Coairmotion [seise*. PLC loll PL.r1 m Fors Machinery lea I46ipwat ISM MIIMIPQT Cardem Tractors a Lars a Cards* tgmipmat JIM IIIJMI►QT Construction Moshietry sea Equipment IS11 Nt1111►g1 Mrsisg Mathinell GOA equipment. eactpt die Meld Isis MLMOrgr oil viola Mechieery and Egaiparst IM NIMpQ Consoyoce and Conesliss Igaip*at IS31 MLMDrgf Industrial Troche. Tractors. Trailers. and Stec6sre 1161 NLMOp" Ilochies Toole, Motel Collie$ 1141 MLemer" Mackie* Tools. Metre Forming ISr,6 m mmv Special uses and Tools. sit Sets, 316* and Feetures. and 1e4061rial Nelda MS Kiecro Mackiee Tool Accesserion a Mesearlms Devices IS46 MUMI►QI Fewer olives Ned tools )SH aLMDFQT "real Vo►hime Mschinerie, SIC list PIl1OrQ/ food Prodarte Mschinery Issl 111."Orli/ Trstile Mechinery list MuasrgT Woodwothieg Machinery )SS6 MI."OP91 Paper idvetr/ve MKhiasry ISSS PllrrmrgT ►elalialt Trolte Methine►y and Igmrlpmtnt Wto atenrrgl Special iduetrl Markievey. PIC Me allttmr(JT Pumps and pumping agoipnral 11161 NLesurgl Bell end Reiser lratings PLC • Not •lorw%vry cioselleva Sic Waste 11pps Deecripeies Cod* • 3161 at"" Air and Can Cempe*seers 11164 IN 4111`9 *laws and take*%$ Tvalilstion Feel 3161 ML'r" ladusttial Froctes rsrasce a swiss )S611 tIL"hM119 Mrckonical Fewer Teonemiseion Iquipsrnt, MC 1161 Mara general Industrial reettfinoty ,sod 1446parat. 1111 Isle) MLM VQ 130ctresic c•mpatane Eq•rigetrae 151-e NLqp►Q Calculating a Atcom mliwa SotAiaps. ascolls tlecttssic Ett•riparal isle 9LlM►FQ Office Marhimes, Dtr ISsl nomit 1 Ce'►tcisl 3s404d67. Dry C306114e2. *d 777974151 Machlovs lots% 01 MmpQ Alt Conditioning sad Were A37 lr.aaiee Z4wirs-at DNA Comrttial and lMu537163 jejTi5#11136w Egairorot sss6 NLMDPQ Measuring and sisseasieg peeps Me NL4npQ Servile iadualey 3loc'%io*e. XIC ISsl at"O"T Cao64r*lees. Pistons. piste% 33029 a valvpe Isis NLWFQT Machinery. Isc"i 13oc2licsl. MC 102 atnop T power. Distribution sea Tprcialtl Tsansloesrrs 1611 anet?Q Swrtchstse and Switchboard Apparatus Isle MLMOPQ Motors a lee*tatess 102 NLNDFQ lmmdusltia3 coastal$ 1611 NLMOPQ Welding Apparatus, 110r3744 )alb N1.4OrQ cashes a Casphite lraducts 161e NLMOPQ Electrical ladsellisl 40pacattls. MC 3632 MLW" soasehead Nsfsigrt*tors end Memo and tots• Frsstees 161s NLFMMQ Llaeerie Moweerate9 and time 1436 NLMDFQ Sewing Mothaspe 161e 21.4oFQ Moosekold Applisecss, MCC 1641 NMOPQ Electric Lays 3") sLMorQ Corleel•Caeeyieg Mitt Desists His NLMFQ Eosidestial Elseltic lightimg flatsras 1646 N140PQ Coserrcis3. asduellial. od leelalati"w3 Lighting Isolates 1641 Vehicular LightisA Equipment 101 NL4npQ Nadia a T*lesssses Necvsvme %eto IM NLMOFQ Phonesrsob Retards aid pit-Tscarard st.pnpelf Tapp 1641 NLIMPQ Nadi* a" aflevisles 71*4966331eg. 3ianalies. awl Setecties Equi"Wal awl Ayarstue 1616 NUM 9 Somiceadectets ash Sshloa 3fr*itt3 ales PLWPQ Electranic Capacitors 3411 HL M?QT tlectromic Coils. 1128474rs*r3, ,led IN%*e lodaclor Isles NLMRPQ Eleclremic Coaponrsts. DEC 1691 PPgM 3161sgp Detersive 1611 NrQ Flinafy settrrrrs. !Dry end fast 3111 Motor Vehicats and raosrerpt tar "dove 1116 IIsMDra Mt.tor Vehicle Fares and dksOssarips , 110 ■LWrQ motor 200.4 1111 M11Nmrg Aircraft 11+4 M1la" Aitcratt Engines awl ratio. rest* 11294 1! Aircraft pates as, Ars331467 1quipMe6l. Pf? • PIC 0 Dent rlsrwhere cl®gsiltvl 11 • iK %see ?we MKfiptlM CoH • ; sole NNW" Ship Osildias sad 0004i►iel list I mnv Dose 0aildiwg and bNioisl jail NtlK" etylsettles. sciselific. Isbralwy MJ Ibsea►ch Iw*t invents - • "is NUK" Astosstic Coolest* for Otpllatiy StNdsselel and C~vciai teticewwels od Appliances "is elm" t/dvattiai lostrwwts few Qeseutieg. Display. sad castwwl of Prateeo /eelablts. sd Negated • ►tdscte late NLIIM Tolosisiag field letters and Ceenllog Novices Nis I111113pQ loattsmrwte fst Noaaurlag and Tenting of electricity sad esoteric $least• jet, mum 11tesurial and Controlling %sic*@. Ott felt NLNOPQ optical looltowels and Learns Ina sularQ Swrgical sad Wakes lostrumests and Apperatss 3142 1LttOPQ Orthapedic. ►eesthetic. and Soogical Appliances awl Supplies slot NLNOPQ 11*4141 tlsipmeat sad supplies Iasi NUWpQ Ophthalmic Coda IOtt NLN PQ fhologrophic t/ulfoswt and $"►lies Uts OLNOIQ Yatcbo. Cloche. tic. Soli 11Lt1or0T Jewelry. Procleoa Sliest Hit NtJ1opQT Silverware. ► oted were. aN Stateless steel wart Sets sn"OPQ Jeweler's Tidiess 1 Nateffals S Lapidary worn S )rid NJst11t1PQ Cootums Jeweler sod Coolest Novaflite, *scope ►otciess looted r Solo NALNDFQ Noodles. pins. Nods sod Iraq. sad Sidlor � lost loos Hl1 NIALN" Sign* owl ""Raising Displays "IS NRLMPQ Serial Cashel$ J011 HALMOPO'T Neaufectorig Iadveltles 4011-4959: TRANSPONTATiON AM MLiC 01111.1tleS 1011 PUT Railroads. Line -Sisal Operstfag _ 4111 too Local sod $wlwrban Troosle 4011 JRLTT Switehisg a Terminal totaNl % note all/ LOWT Local passenger toansportatian. KC alto LIYT tOsieA* 4191 too .Ialotcity and N*ral Nighway passenger . Tcanspset*tiow a1S1 LPwT School greet - ♦III T 11*1610wswce a Service ►orilltles for Sister %%felt Possessor TrM*pwrtatlM $tit AUNT Local Trur!fsa wiUeut Storage arts ALMIT Tewciiwl. Incept Local Atli J UYT Local Visiting with Storage &III AFTT Tr"Aini torsi**$ facilities a/11 Nthir N.S. postal Service ITthicie Sialefc4met fell) _ Pill i Deep See Fertile veMepwctoiiow aaaD AtiAO JRLTYT iterisa Cory* Nidlial YOter 1160"0psrloteew services. Nit ._.. .. -. -i ,..•^... �� .. ... SIC het Iterwheee cINeitits - .� ; ;. cue c.: Sit CO 94480 two SyteotptiM rill T Air Trestpsolotlem. Certificated Cartier, &U3, T Aieperts sal Tofise foolds alai LIN Aiepoel Terminal urvicee Gall Atm Code Petroleum live Liao* Gall JIL►IT #*flood P9114306m Pave Uses 4619 ALIT fit* Loses, WC NII LT fence so 3/adae3 :1112 Lt media mrsodcaatinv 4911 LT 7030eisien 3readcastims 4111 T 234clfic 3479ice9 6131 T tlectriezi a 1111or Serelces Glow T vas a Other Services Nil T Combination miil3sios. WC 49sl T iewreale 3134e09 49113 T Refuse 379200s NSl AM Sanitary 301vic3ol. met 5093-51941: VW1.1utz lust 30/1 T $crop a Nast* ae42413als. wholesale slot LM Chooicals 204 A3144 Psadscto wholesale slot A Tars Smtflioe a490 • ALT points. vaeoishes, 2 3099,1it's s371-slaa: =TAIL 'UO4 $:31 ALt point. z3ass. sad 10833v8902 3escos dal AAT Nafdvary 3larvs sloe ALF 110hile now 9093019 soil AIAt Department 310o22 aHl AIMS Ni,celientess sonor*1 xrrc3►asdise $totes Mf LWV motor vehicle 3003or9 Ilk" a rased' WI LFYT "also Vehicle 0083v99 ivied 014393 ss11 LOW Asia a now 3uvp17 31se22 as:l LENT wselise 'Service Slatians, jetail sssl IPYT Rost Deasero ssll LWT 60109911430 3483012 $sIt LPYT Awlemetivs 1lealows, MC SPlt Nossoheld Avvoiascs $+teems. 2e2ai3 $lit LT Automatic 11arcbssdisial '*®elder 4e9441t* S982 T Idol a ace 9043e73 %1a1 T peel 013 9o01012 slit T Lilwli#4 Po/falevs Ces :les3otsi IIIS-00101. 313y1C13 i1MiS72313 I fill I" ceim Otoratvd lawadoits .and Rae C3e04100 1111 LN OWI C/oMiwe vlowts. lncelt set CteMewl tilt in Carpet aid VPhftl°+1vf7 Iola IN Iwdwtrad t4wearfsfs list LT Iueeral Services as.1 re"atieios list (MALT ahrtlwwr 44..1150e49 3.•r+errs air o Mwr .I4wt1.to ♦/••1ife.4 • s•C rate two Beectirtlen sit rats two sesetirtias Code lost Ill Alveftisias. RKC 8611-0900: RlsstLLAntlMt ` fill ifs tifect mail Advertlales services fill LOt el*eptiot and Mt•egli•e services $411 ALP? A ad fill LOT Commeteiai eteaeaphy Art. mod Cr ole@ fh gall AK AeheeQfe. sotdaicelle and loslesifaf Ceedews flat ACM Risiefecties a" tsttrsiestlem services goal LIT Osocomsercisi tbfational. seientisle. sad f>•• Ise Cloenies ed'laistoomme services to swlflags message% eesswisatiowe sd tither s*ilde*es. WC service*. KC spas lIT Rreverch ad 11mlepatme L•L•rsteries iNs OMSI Ihelelinishles La•orsteelve IM1 Lill Commercial toolies Laboratories • plot Iirs tslinamiskof Charlie$ services Isis LMY ►asseager Car Re•cai and Lassies. without srivaro Ills LpMT temc% sestal sad Leases, wftheet drivers list LM ORility trailer and Recreational Vehicle Motel ' till Low Up and sedy Repair shops. 4•tomative Ism LM lire Reireadies sod $*pale .hops. A•tmestivt i Isis Lill Isint Shops. A*temotive f - will LM Central Automotive Mgit Sacra ISI• MIT Aatomative srpais "s. K•. ' 1611 LIT "die • tefevisiem Repair SAeps 1NI Of setristration • Air fdifiies service • ooen .add bop Repair s 1619 "If electrical • Itlectreels Rtrair shore. Kt .� f•II LT Watch. Close, see Jovalry Upair _ > 1641 JILT Rvm lalef and f Rt e 1 Ihs f lopair _ 1 • s N L nr •. Idt R g1e t it s N p 1694 LT Arsslore sr*iadles Shops 1699 Lt strait Shops and Related serereN. an 1 i d• • •elm it Tsr1 psit al t 1 r � tot services Allied to merlon Iist*es Pteduetlen • 1.11 JSLt theatrical Irodmcers loacept Region pleterfal a"- - Riscolisw•e*s Th•strical services -. `. 1111 ASC public Coll Coorsea 1H1 OF Cein-OperatN Amostse•t %vices 19% JRLIl Amese"Re fork* l4•• Am AM*atwtnt and Rteeaatism Setslceo. KC 3. seal L1Y contest medical sea $*Weigel Maspitala Nat LIT Specialty Mespitals. escopt Iaychistelf - sere LIT medical Laboratories Nll LIT Smal Loberstarits EMI rat htpotisnt Core taclittles 11LI-111ll: tOKA110MAL SUVICt! s[C • fora eleesl ate 4188e11144 sill JIM elementery ed stesoderp Schools sill JAL►T colleges. MniveWsitiy. /tutesslMsl sehNis, iwd J*aiee Callssse $s•! JALITY fsealiswsl Schools. mope Vocational Ala* �Ali6e e, el•V evil Jails JaRY schools. NEC SIMON sod td*cational Services. KC Jab e low Kaf of aekobl1ita1fen Services • SIC • bt •tst*tteff clot•lfird 1! . j PROPOSED ATT ACtIMENT 5 • INTERIM TRANSPORTATION 1WROVEMENTS As ®upont Plaza Ingrove en+s . 1. K 11nd Avantm and SE 3rd Street Adjust west curb on public land on southbound approach WA 00just trofflc signal heads as required, to create four versus present three southbound through lanes. Lene drop to be easily accoRynodated south of Intersection wl+hin existing" Pev4men+ through left turn at Biscayne Boulevard away prior to Srickell Avenue bridge approach. Modify signing end striping throughout section as required. . 2. SE ind Avenue and SE Znd Street Adjust channelizatton curbing In southeast corner to provide two vastbound through lanes and three separate left turn lanes, plus one free flow left turn lane Inside ovdifled c annel izatlon Island. two of the left turn lanes for access to 1-95 entrance ramp near SE Znd Avenue and SE 3rd Street, one mandetory and one opt tonal. Adjustment of channeltzatiw+ Island In southeast owner to also at low three southbound through l anes, lransltloned through Intersection with skip gilds, Imes. (One mandatory right turn Ions and two through lanes currently In place.) 9 3. Biscayne Plate Project Entrance r • Entrance and exit -drives to be coordinated with ultimate bifurcated romp design and City of Miami Phbl is Works Oepsr+msnt. O ametr is alterations at project drives near Biscayne Boulevard May and Biscayne Boulevard Way. This is to .� Include revised drainage as necessary# outside pavement widening within existing right of Ways signaliaatlon of exit drive to be installed when warranted, and revised pavament markings. Also provide custom material and construction for opproxMete Iy 192M feat of sidewalks along project street frontage and riverwalk frontages and all seating, lighting. and landscaping. all for public wse. 4. Biscayne Boulevard Way Access Roadway • City to preserve present public right of way for separate 101 oastbournd access roadway south of Biscayne Boulevard Way to extend from SE 3rd Avenue to Biscayne Pioza project sou+, vehiculer traffic entrance. Preservation to extend at less+ to date of ooepletion of project Phase 2. (Separate access roadway not deemed necessary to project Phase 1.) A142 k ...... _..Sui,...,� of w a ATTACHMENT 6- STATE OF FLORIDA� lLhM-c7•!S • D91AXTXt.%''T OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DIVISION OF RKSOURCt FLANNIHO AND MA.NAGERI?:T BUREAU OF L-ANID AND WATER KANAGFUMENT =571 Executive (Center Circle, !Cast Tallahaxaea, flaridA 32301-8244 (904) 448-4925 Subsection 340.06(16), Florida Statutes, places the responsibility on the developer of an approved developtent o: regional impact (DRI) for submitting an annual report to the —local government, the Regional planning Council, the Deps:tten: Of Community Affairs, and to all affected permit agencies, an the data specified in the Development Orders The failure of a developer to submit the report on the date specified in the development order may result in the temporary suspension of the development order by the local government until the annual report is submitted to the review agencies. This re4ultement applies to all developments of regional Impact which have beer. approved since August i, 2180. If you have any questions about this required report, Call the DRI enforcement Coordinator st, (IC4) 4S1.4l25. Please send the original completed annual report to -the designated local government official stated in the develop.ent order with (2) copy to each of the following: a) The regional planning agency of 3urisdiction: b) A11 affected perzitting agenciesa e) Division of Resource Planning 4nd Management Bureau of Land and hater Management 2571 Executive Center Circle, east Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Please format your Annual Status Report after the format esa-pre provided below. AK.%%%L STATUS RIPORT Reporting Period: to Month/Day/Year xOnth/Day/Year SLWH-07-ds Page Two . i 1) Describe any changes made in the proposed plan of development, phasing, or in the representations contained in the Application for Davelopment Approval since the Development of Regional Impact received approval. Please note any actions (substantial determinations) taken by local government to ace:ess• these changes. Notes It a response is to be seat* than one sentence, attach as tabibit °A° a detailed denciption of each change and copies o: the ;edified site plan drawings. Rxhibit °A" should Also address the following additional Items if applicable. a) Describe changes in the plan of development of pbasin; for the reporting year and tot the subsequent pears; b) State any known incremental DRI applications for development approval or requests tot a substantial deviation determination that were tiled In the reporting year and to be tiled during the next years _ e) Attach a copy of any notice ®f the adoption of development order or the subsequent modification of an - adopted development order that was recorded by the developer pursuant to Subsection 300.06(1`) (d), F.S. _) nag there been a change in local government jurisdiction for any portion of the development since the development order was issued? if so, has the annexin local government adopted a sew Development of Regional Ispaet �evelopmans order for the project? please provide a copy of the order adopted by the annexing local government. 3) Provide copies of any revised master plans, inetemerta! site plans, etc., not previously submitted. Notes If a response is to be more than one of two sentences, attach as txbibit 02.0 1) Provide a summary comparison of development activity proposed and actually conducted for the reporting yeas. txamples Number of dwelling snits constructed, site improve "Ata, lots goad, acres mined, gross float area constructed, barrels of storage capacity completed, permits obtained, etc. Notes It a response it to be acre than one sentence, attach as isbibit °C.° S) nave any undeveloped tracts of land in the develc; sac (other than individual single-family lots) been sold to a separate entity or developer? It so, identify tract, its size, - and the buyer. Please provide maps which show the tracts Involved. ?tact Suyet Notes If a response is to be sore than one sentence, attach as tsbibit °D.° S) Describe any lands purchased or optioned adjacent to the original Development of Regional Impact site subsequent to issuance of the development order. Identify such land, its size, and intended use on a site plan and map.. Note: It a response is to be sore than one sentence, attach as tabibit °t.° A-25 ,a r i. . Page Tbrae 7) List anY-substantial local, state, and federal which have been obtained, applied for# or denied, during this a reporting period. specify the agency, type of permit, and dv;y. for each. Note: if a response is to be toot* than one sentence, attach as =ahlbit ®f,,, 01 Assess ,a and tinuing Compliance ew1th.snYmccnditions.ofaspprovalmcontained in the DAi development order_ Not*$ Attach as tahibit % v (fee attached form) 9) Provide any information that is specifically required by tAe Development Arder to be included to the annual report. 10) provide a state&ent certifying tbat all persons have been *ant co ies of the annual report in Conformance with Subsections 3t0.06{16) and (16), P.$. Person eompletino "a e�...•a...._.___ r J-86-537 6/19/86 9/15/86 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AMENDING A DEVELOPMENT ORDER (RESOLUTION 79-396; MAY 24, 1979, AS AMENDED) FOR THE MIAMI CENTER I PROJECT, A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT, PROPOSED BY MIAMI CENTER JOINT VENTURE, AND LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 100 CHOPIN PLAZA AND APPROXIMATELY 201-399 S. BISCAYNE BOULEVARD BEING TRACT D, DUPONT PLAZA (50-11); INCORPORATING THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL; MAKING FINDINGS, APPROVING SAID PROJECT SUBJECT TO THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER PERTAINING TO THE ENTIRE SITE; FURTHER, ADDING CONDITIONS PERTAINING ONLY TO THE SOUTHERN 3.01 ACRES OF THE SUBJECT SITE KNOWN AS "ONE DUPONT PLAZA" (FORMERLY KNOWN AS "BISCAYNE PLAZA") PHASES 1 AND 2 AND APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE SUBJECT PROJECT KNOWN AS ONE DUPONT PLAZA PHASES -1 AND 2; FURTHER, DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO RECORD AND SEND COPIES OF THE HEREIN RESOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT ORDER TO AFFECTED AGENCIES AND THE DEVELOPER. WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting held on May 16, 1979, Item fl, following an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB-23- 79 by a 7 to 0 vote (1 member absent), recommending approval of the Development Order for the Ball Point Project, (AKA Miami Center I project), a Development of Regional Impact; and WHEREAS, Holywell Corporation proposed the undertaking of the Ball Point Project (AKA Miami Center I project) a Development of Regional Impact, as . defined by Chapter 22F-2, Rules of the State of 'Florida Department of Administration, located within the City of Miami, on a tract of land containing approximately 8.46 acres located on the North bank at the mouth of the Miami River, comprised of 928,200 square feet of gross office space; 630 hotel units in a structure containing 550,000 square feet of gross hotel space; 500 dwelling units in two towers containing 865,700 square feet of gross residential space; 75,000 square feet of gross space for retail use; and 2,665 parking spaces; and WHEREAS, Holywell Corporation submitted a complete Application for Development Approval for a Development of Regional Impact to the South Florida Regional Planning Council pursuant' to Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes,- aft+ did receive a favorable recommendation for a proposed developm nt order on May 7, 1979, as set forth in the Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council; and WHEREAS, the Application for Development Approval, as reviewed by the South Florida Regional Planning Council, referred to an office building with 928,200 square feet of gross office space;* a hotel structure with 550,000 gross square feet, two condominium towers with 865,700 gross square feet and a parking structure with 2,560 parking spaces; and WHEREAS, Holywell Corporation complied with all the requirements set forth in Ordinance No. 8290 by appearing before the City of Miami Planning Advisory Board; and WHEREAS, the City Commission considered the Report -and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council dated May 7, 1979 and each element required to be considered by Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the Ball Point Project, as originally proposed by the Holywell - Corporation in 1979, complied with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, was consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complied with local and development regulations, being then the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 6871; and WHEREAS, the Ball Point Project did not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami; and WHEREAS, the Ball Point Project was consistent with the Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council and did not unreasonably interfere with any of the considerations and objectives set forth in Chapter 380, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the Miami Zoning Board, on May 21, 1979, granted a variance from the 300 foot height limit and granted Conditional Use approval for parking uses as allowed in Ordinance No. 6871, the then -Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance for the City of Miami; and WHEREAS, the City Commission determined that all requirements of publication and other legal requirements for the issuance of the proposed Development Order had been compiled with; and WHEREAS, the City Commission deemed it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami to issue a Development Order for - 2- Impact; and WHEREAS, the Miami City Commission, by Resolution 79-396; May 24, 1979, issued a Development Order, attached hereto as Exhibit "A", approving with modifications, the ball Point Project (AKA Miami Center I project) a Development of Regional Impact, as proposed by Holywell Corporation for Tract D, DUPONT PLAZA (50-11), which project was limited to 928,200 square feet of gross office space; 630 hotel units in a structure containing 550,000 square feet of gross hotel space; 500 dwelling units in two towers containing 865,700 square feet of residential space; 75,000 square feet of gross retail use and 2,565 parking spaces; and WHEREAS, the Miami City Commission by Resolution 80-707; September 25, 1980, amended the Development Order (Resolution 79-396; May 24, 1979) by amending paragraph 7 of Exhibit "A" to provide that the Holywell Corporation reach agreement on interim traffic improvements prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy rather than prior to issuance of a building permit and, further finding that this amendment did not constitute a substantial deviation from the terms of the Development Order (Resolution 79-396; May 24, 1979); and WHEREAS, the development on the north area of the site described in Exhibit "E", ("Miami Center Existing") has been largely completed; and a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued, subject to a restrictive covenant addressing remaining conditions in the Development Order; and WHEREAS, the Miami Center Joint Venture ("Applicant"), successors in interest to the Holywell Corporation, had proposed amending the Development • Order to change the development allowed on the southern 3.01 acres of the site (more particularly described on Exhibit "F" attached hereto and now known as "One Dupont Plaza"); claiming that such amendment did not constitute a substantive deviation; and WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, on February 6, 1985, by a 6 to 0 vote recommended that the amendments constituted substantial deviations to be referred to the South Florida Regional Planning Council; and WHEREAS, Mr. Frank Callahan, Chairman, South Florida Regional Planning Council, in a letter to then Miami Mayor Maurice Ferre, dated February 21, 1985, stated that the proposed amendments constituted a substantial deviation according to Chapter 380.06(17) F.S.; that the Council would appeal any - 3- declsio --of the City to the contrary, and urged the applicant to submit -an mended Application for Development approval to the Council and City; and WHEREAS, on March 28, 1985, in pubic hearing before the Miami City Commission, the applicant withdrew the item; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 380.06 (17)(a) F.S. (1983) the amendments proposed by the applicant constituted a substantial deviation from terms of the previously issued Development Order; and WHEREAS, Applicant has submitted an amended Application for Development Approval for a Development of Regional Impact for the entire 8.46 acre site of the Miami Center I project on July 11, 1985, more particularly described in Exhibit "D" attached hereto, to the South Florida Regional Planning Council pursuant to Chapter 380.06 F.S. Said application requests changes on only the .One Dupont Plaza project site by deleting the previously approved two towers comprising 500 dwelling units of 865,700 square feet of gross residential building area and 1,220 parking spaces and substituting the following therefor: two mixed use towers comprising 150 dwelling units of 300,000 gross square feet and 220,000 gross square feet of commercial use; 1,480,000 gross square feet of office use and retaining 1200 parking spaces, altogether comprising 2,600,000 gross square feet; and WHEREAS, the South Florida Regional Planning Council, on February 3, 1986, recommended approval, with conditions, of the proposed revised project "One Dupont Plaza", as set forth in the Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council, dated February 4, 1986; attached as Exhibit "C" and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, Applicant has complied with all the requirements set forth in Ordinance 9500, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami -- pertaining to the southern 3.01 acres of the site; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has considered the Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council dated February 4, 1986 and each element required to be considered by Chapter 380.06 F.S.; and WHEREAS, the One Dupont Plaza project complies with the City of Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, is consistent with the orderly development of the City of Miami, and complies, as to the northerly 5.45 acres of the site known as "Miami Center Existing" (Exhibit "E"), with local and land development regulations and collies, as to the southerly 3.01 acres of the site known as "One Dupont Plaza" (Exhibit "F"), Phases 1 and 2, with local land development regulations; and -4- 101" .l AS 11 tineWpont Plaza does not unrease6ly interfere with the achievement of the obJ ectives of the adopted State land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami; and WHEREAS, the One Dupont Plaza is consistent with the Report and Recome, dations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council (February 4, 1986) and cues not unreasonably interfere with any of the considerations and objectives set forth in Chapter 380 F.S.; and WHEREAS, the Miami Zoning Board, at its meeting of June 2, 1986, Item 3 following an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution Z8 58-86 by.a 9 to 0 vote, granting a variance, with conditions, from Section 2023, Zoning Ordinance 9500, to provide 3 of 10 required off-street loading stalls 12' x 35' x 15' and of 8 required off street loading stalls 12' x 55' x 15'; and WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of June 18, 1986, Item 1, following an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution PAB 20-86 by a 9 to 0 vote, recommending approval, with modifications, of the amended Development Order for the Miami Center I project; and WHEREAS, the City Commission, at its meeting of June 26, 1986, Item PZ-13 passed Motion 86-520 which continued the item to 3:30 pm, September 25, 1986, subject to the applicant's acceptance of ten minimum requirements as outlined by the Planning Department; failing which the applicant would not be required to appear; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has determined 'that all requirements of publication and other legal requirements for the issuance of the Development Order have been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the best interests of the general welfare of the City of Miami to approve an amended Development Order for the Miami Center I project, a Development of Regional Impact as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION. OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Section 1. The following findings of fact and conclusion of taw are made with respect to the project: a. The City Commission hereby determines that One Dupont Plaza is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood PI an. b. The City Commission hereby determines that One Dupont Plaza is in accord with the zoning district classifications of Zoning Ordinance 9500. C. The City Commission hereby finds that One Dupont Plaza would not j have an adverse impact' on soils, animal life, or vegetation and f further finds that it would have a number of positive impacts -- including: 1. Up to 2,500 permanent new jobs would be generated by the One Dupont Plaza project, and, as a result, nearly 2,900 additional full-time jobs could be created in South Florida, with a $108 million increase in total wages and $184 million in value added to the regional economy. 2. A net positive fiscal impact of $8.1 million would be created by the One Dupont Plaza project. 3. A reduction in the growth of regional energy consumption would result from the energy efficient conservation measures proposed by the Applicant. d. The City Commission hereby finds that One Dupont Plaza would have a number of adverse impacts• which result from the normal course of development or can be 'potentially mitigated by the applicant through the conditions in the Development Order, as • follows: I. Increase annual energy use within the Region by the equivalent of nearly 6.7 million gallons of fuel oil. 2. Increase the amount and number of hazardous wastes generated. on -site. 3. Place additional unfunded demands upon police, emergency y rescue, and fire services. K 5. Generate 2,464 AM and 2,250 PM peak -hour vehicle trips (Miami Center existing and One Dupont Plaza) on the regional k roadway network and, along with other development traffic, reduce levels of service on segments of the regional roadway network. Section 2. A Development Order, amending Resolutions 79-396; May 24, 1979, as amended by Resolution 80-707; September 25, 1980; being the Development Order for the Ball Point Project, AKA Miami Center I Project, a Development of Regional Impact, proposed by Ethan Minsky, as agent for Miami Center Joint Venture ("Applicant"), for Tract D, DU PONT PLAZA (50-11) P.R.D.C. is hereby approved with conditions, and granted and issued in two parts: Exhibit "A" attached hereto -and made a part of this Resolution, pertaining to the entire 8.46 acres of Miami Center I (more particularly -- 16 .q described in Exhibit "D" attached hereto and made a part hereof), and Exhibit "B", attached hereto and made a part hereof, pertaining only to the southerly 3.01 acres of the site known as the "One Dupont Plaza" Projectl, Phases 1 and 2 and more particularly described in Exhibit "F", which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. Exhibit "B" shall be binding only upon Applicant, its assigns and/or successors, and shall constitute a covenant running with the land for the southern 3.01 acres that are part of the One Dupont Plaza project in accordance with Section 9 of this Resolution. Nothing set forth in Exhibit "B" shall be binding in any way upon the owners of Miami Center Existing, its successors and/or assigns, nor shall anything in Exhibit "B" increase, decrease or otherwise affect. the obligations of Miami Center Existing under f Exhibit "A". To the extent that there are any obligations, rights, duties, privileges or liabilities set forth in Exhibit "A" which are in conflict with, or which are substantially similar to, obligations, rights, duties, privileges or liabilities set forth in Exhibit "B", then, as to the southern 3.01 acres, Exhibit "B" shall control and supersede Exhibit "A"; provided, however, that nothing in Exhibit "B" shall be construed to in any way control or supersede the provisions of Exhibit "A" as the latter apply to the northern 5.45 acres. Section 3. The Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council dated February 4, 1986, is attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and made a part of this Development Order, provided however, that nothing set forth in said Exhibit "C", shall be binding in any way upon "Miami Center Existing" (the northern, developed portion of the Miami Center I project consisting of the Hotel Intercontinental EF/K/A Pavillon Hotel], the Edward Ball office building and garage and associated uses described in Exhibit "E"), its successors and/or assigns. The Report and -Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council dated May 7, 1979, on file with the City Clerk as Exhibit "B" to Resolution 79-396; May 24, 1979, remains in effect only as not superseded by Section 2 herein or in conflict with the aforementioned Exhibit "C" or Exhibit "B" attached hereto. l The name of the proposed project on the southerly 3.01 acres of the original Miami Center 1 Project has been changed from "Biscayne Plaza" to "One DuPont Plaza" because of a name conflict with an existing "Biscayne Plaza Shopping Center and Office Complex." Mr. Russell Wirth, proposed developer of the southern 3.01 acres described in Exhibit F, attached hereto, stipulated to the name change, on the record, during the Planning Advisory Board Meeting of June 18, 1986. Consequently, the proposed Exhibit B amendments to the Development Order of 1979, as amended in 1980, are for a project now known as "One Dupont Plaza", and will be identified as such where possible. Any references to "Biscayne Plaza" are to be construed as • references to "One Dupont Plaza" and vice versa. -7_ Section 4. The Consolidated Application for Development Approval- (GADA) as revised pursuant to Condition 20 Exhibit "B" is incorporated herein by reference and is on file with the City Clerk and is relied upon by the parties in discharging their statutory duties under Chapter 380.06 F.S. and local ordinance provided, however that nothing set forth in the CADA shall be binding in any way upon the owner of "Miami Center Existing" (the northern, developed portion of the Miami Center I project consisting of the Hotel Intercontinental (F/K/A Pavillon Hotel), the Edward Ball office building and garage and associated uses), its successors and/or assigns. The Application for Development Approval, filed in 1979, as revised pursuant to Condition 16 of Exhibit "A" of Resolution 79-396, May 24, 1979, remains in effect only as not superseded by, or in conflict with, the aforementioned Consolidated Application for Development 'Approval. Substantial compliance with the representations contained in the Applications for Development Approval are a condition for approval unless waived or modified by agreement among the Council, City and Applicant, its successors and/or assigns, jointly and severally. Section S. Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" shall be binding upon the Applicant Miami Center Joint Venture and its successors in interest as provided herein. Exhibit "A" shall be binding upon the owner of Miami Center Existing and its successors and assigns. Section 6. The Development Order attached to this Resolution for Development of the One Dupont Plaza project shall expire on December 31, 1994, or upon certification by the Planning Director to the City Commission that all conditions of the Development Order have been met, whichever is earliest. Section 7. The City Clerk --is hereby authorized and directed to send certified copies of the Resolutions immediately to: The Florida Department of Community Affairs, 2571 Executive Center Circle East, Tallahassee, Florida 32301; The South Florida Regional Planning Council, 3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 140, Hollywood, Florida 33021; Ethan Minsky, Esq., Shea and Gould, 801 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1401, Miami, Florida 33131; and Jeffrey Bercow, Esq., Steel Hector b Davis, 4000 Southeast Financial Center, Miami Florida 33131- 2398. Section 8. The recitals of fact referred to in the "WHEREAS" clause are true and correct and made a part hereof. -8- 11 Section 9. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record this Development Order, consisting of this Resolution and Exhibits "A", "B", "C", "D", "E", and "F" and their attachments, with the Clerk, Dade County Circuit Court, pursuant to Section 380.06(16)(f), Florida Statutes (1985), specifying that .this Development Order is a covenant running with the land that consists of the southerly 3.01 acres that is the site for the Biscayne Plaza project and more particularly described in Exhibit "F". This covenant shall be binding on Miami Center Joint Venture, its successors and/or assigns, jointly or severally. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 1986. ATTEST: A �� 0,000410 s •e ' JIB/,f1 - 5/1)09 ' 79-396 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF 'MIAMI COnIISSION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF A DEVELOPMENT ORDER. - APPROVING WITH MODIFICATIOMJS, THE BALL POINT PROJECT,A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACt. PROPOSED BY.HOLY'dELL CORPORATION, FOR TRACT D. DUPONT PLAZA (50-11), LOCATED ON THE NORTH BANK AND AT THE 14OUTH OF THE MIAMI RIVER, AFTER CON- DUCTING A PUBLIC HEARING AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER • 380.06 , FLORIDA STATUTES. AIJD CONSIDERING THE _ ' REPORT AND RECOk.270DATIO'NS OF THE SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL AND THE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHED HERETO AS EMiIBIT "A"; THE RECO►4MENDATIONS OF THE SOUTH FLORIDA PEGIONAL FLA.TSING COUNCIL ATTACHED HERETO AS E>MIBIT "B"; AND THE APPLICA- TION FOR DEVELOPMTNT APPROVAL INCOP.pOWED BY REFERENCE: FINDING THAT THE DE'v LOPER' S PROPOSED CHANGES FR0:4 THAT APPROVED BY THE SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLA;vVING COUNCIL INVOLt c NO SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION; FURTHER DIBECTI:TG THE CITY CLERK TO SEND THE RESOLUTION TO AFFECTED AGENCIES AND THE DEVELOPER. WIiEREAS, The Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting held on May 16. 1979, Item „�1, following an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB-23-79 by a 7 to 0 vote (1 member obseo t). recommending approval of the Development Order for the Ball Point Project, a Development of Regional Impact, as hereinafter ser forth; and FINDINGS OF FACT WHEREAS, Holywell Corporation has propQ,sed the undertaking of the Ball Point Project, a Development of Regional Impact, as defined by Chapter 22F-2. Rules of the State of Florida Department of Administration, located within the City of Miami. on a tract of 8.46 acres. at the North bank and at the mouth of the -Miami River, comprised •of 805,400 square feet of gross office space; 630 hotel units in a structure containing 658,400 square feet of gross hotel space; 500 dwelling units; 85,000 square feet of gross apace for retail use; and 2.365 parking spaces; and COY M ]96 • MEEnNG t MAY 79 " �° A r WHEREAS. Holywell Corporation has submitted a Complete Application for Development Approval for a Development of Regional Impact to the South Florida Regional Planning Council' pursuant to Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes, and did receive a favorable recommendation for a proposed development order on May 7•, 1979, -as set forth in the -Report and Recommendations of the South Florida gional Planning Council attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and made a = part hereof; 'and WHEREAS. the Application for Development Approval, as.reviewed by the South Florida Regional Planning Council, referred to an office building with 928,200 square feet or gross office space; a hotel structure with 550,000 gross square feet, and a parking structure with 2,560 parking spaces, which does not amount to outstanding change from what is now proposed; and WHEREAS, Holywell Corporation has complied with all the requirements set forth in Ordinance 117o. 8290; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has considered the Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council and each element required to be considered by Chapter 360.06 Florida Statutes; and CO:JCLUSIONS OF LAW WHEREAS, the Ball Point Project, proposed by the Holywell Corporation complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies with local and development regulations, being Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 6871; and WHEREAS, the proposed development does not unreasonable inter- fere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami;. and WHEREAS, the proposed development is consistent with the Report and Reco=end,ations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council and does not unreasonably interfere with any of the considerations and objectives set forth in Chapter 330. Florida Statutes; and t a •.� %JJEBEAS, the uiA- Zoning Board, can e:ay 2A. 79, granted i a variaPce from t►te 300 foot height limit and granted C'onditiotral Use approval for parking uses as allowed in Ordinance No. 6871, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordi,naxice for the City of ttiami; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has determined that all require- ments of publication and other legal requirements for the issuance of the proposed Development Order have been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Comtission deems it advisable and in the best interests of the general welfare of the City t4iami to 'issue a Development Order for the Development of Regional Impact, as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT R.CSOLVED.BY THE COISIISSION OF THE CITY OF MIA`II. FLORIDA: Section 1. A Development Order, attached hereto as Exhibit "A", approving with modifications, the Ball Point Project, a Development. of Regional I;tpact, proposed by Hol:r4ell Corporation for Tract D. DL'PO:J: PLAZA (50-11), located on the North bank and at the mouth of the Miami River, be and the same is hereby granted and issued. Section 2. The Report and Reco=endations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council dated May 7, 1979. is attached as Exhibit "B", and made a part of. this Development Order. Section 3. The Application for Development Approval is incorporated herein by reference and relied upon by the parties in discharging their statutory duties under Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes. Substantial compliance with the representations contained in the Application for Development Approval is a condition -for approval unless waived or modified by agreement among the parties. Section 4. Pursuant to Section 380.06 (2). Florida Statutes. the City of Miami has reviewed the proposed changes to the Applica- tion for Development Approval from that approved by the South Florida Regional Planning Council, and finds no substantial deviation there- from. Section 5. * The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to send certified copies of this Resolution immediately to the Florida Division of State Planning, Department of Administration. Room 530. Carlton Building, Tallahassee. Florida 32304; to the -3- South Florida Regional Planning Council, 1515 N.W. 167th Screet, Suite 429, Miami, Florida; and to Holywell Corporation, 2 DuPont Circle, Suite 100, Washington, D. C. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24 day ofY 1979. ' MAURICE A FERRE -MAURIC c .A YW wY /!'^' ..0,•t�s:.-.t."•M _.. ... _.-_... 'e'.•tc+ellnlll:4.-7•, a..,sw®'°.fR�'w:.,mlM+M•:.�a+•..w+rATRnca.,b. '.+ s �'- �. ..t. .• .. .. •. .ter. ar�..��^. .•..�..r�s...el�•i-.e-:..,....�...-w�.a.. _,,. ... •. :•..�••s: �•_ fi-' r.• •tAreew.w��a.�� • •. i.L.r .••w..ra,:�.•�w. .•::r ..'y.•.�7f': �... .:::h.,•s..• �:: .. r«"...r.wwARP"• ..•.t •••�+'. •R.{.....b.•..�r•.• .,,r..1+wf•.�•r �Y .•+.e+•. .w•aa^y�..y�'�..:...-,.-®.�... +•w::....� .. -. .. .. ..... �• . •i t .•• .... • •a , .. • ti.. ...:.•�`�,.r,�,•..,....r �Zp'- T. y4w,..••T7M4�W Y-iw ►'J. .s }•��1Y f.lY�l H.. EMIBIT A V f - DEVELOPMENT ORDER i Let it be known that pursuant to Chapter 390.0 Florida statutes the Commission of the City of Miami Florida has considered in public hearing held on May 24, 1979 the issuance of Development Order for Sall Point, a Development of.Regional impact to be located in the City of Miami. Pursuant to Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes and after due consideration of the consistency of this proposed development with regulations, and the Report and ?f Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning council, tfui Coammissioa took the following action: Approval of this development with the�lollowinq modifications. -� Dwelocs+ant_ •;_ Cs? ,? 1. The development is limited to a project containing not more than: 905.400 square feet of gross office space; 630 hotel units in a structure con- tsininq 656,400 square feet of gross hotel space; S00 dwelling units: f 85,000 square feet of gross retail use and 2,36E parking spaces. The Project as proposed mould comprise an average FloArea Ratio of 6.36 for g u the 8.46 acre site. approval having been previously granted for a vaz aAee3: five the 30O-foot height limit and conditional use approval for parking uses. Further, the lot coverage is4;•the ground usable open space is ; the enclosed pedestrian open space at main floor level is 6 o as specified by the Applicant in the Application for Development Approval and the preliminary design documents of March 23. as_amended by Supplement dated MAV 1 , 1979. WE sib ?! S , tssa":R r ? ✓ na . , 3 : i uti5 fx.`ri"a!, ....•„. F, ., us, .4,. r �,Ittit: i4., ..Y,k..4 v... t'l.:i .-.3:1 e:!;,,i s .,W ai.;R,.,?i z. :'s:a; _ , .wca., - - i•;F%, s�. l' - ii`.x`tle _.F.f,te{G5.-iv.l5..—......_:..� •\l.r��•.• • �! .• IM•N�\!�'MY ll.1.•Mllf'IR.��`I'..•._•. • .. ,�•,. 1001. 2. The applicant is encouraged to address the.following eonaerns about the proposed developments a. Activities should be incorporated along the River Walk in order to provide meaningful and continuous pedestrian experiences and attractions. b. Attention should be given to the treatment of the Biscayne Boulevard facade to ameliorate the apparent bulk of the structure. c. Attention should be given within the project to providing views of the Miami River and Biscayne Bay as, for example, by interior design of the main floor level. d. Attention should be given to shade and landscaping at the podium level. These concerns, as shown in construction documents, are subject to Planning Department approval prior to the issuance of a building permit for parking and any enclosed areas. permits for such matters as foundations, seawall renovation and site preparation will be issued, however, upon proper applications therefore, before such approval is required. l.The applicant will dedicate a pedestrian easement of not less than 20 feet to the City of Miami in perpetuity for Miami River Walk and Bayfront Walk purposes, and will construct the stalk and provide furniture and landscapi•nif deemed necessary by the City of Miami. The applicant will design the eatte�. secst.area and adjacent private space to allow views and access frost the project establishments, while fostering appropriate public use of the wal)wav4,, Responsibility for perpetual maintenance of all - sections of the stake by tho Applicant will be specified in the easement docuumt. Pinal laAd800 are subject to the approval of the Planning and Public storks Dep&ctMftta p D= to the issuance of a permit for the Miami ldver stalk and f t W&IA. ,r -•-•- ..2- l a •�•��-ti�'S�.�'•"®I!�SS��RIM.�.��� •�+ii�la6'ir •ti�•'�:�t �' moo. _ F • • � , .. •. .. •.. .%«.�"... .. ,• • . • • •. •. •,i•�� •.� . . .•♦ap\Y,•MK. �•. . . •t•.. . •. •4•,P♦. •.. r... •••,•V'.•gv.►•:N•M•.�P•1�M• �Wf­•..•.w•�.ly... ...� :• t I•L.Y•..1•. ..=..i•iii+'�/'i.i. i'+ �.w,+i.wr:•r���w. � .�Iww♦,. .w ♦ R� • •...,�.....•r".r�.•.. Y.. ir:.i ... •!wn�:�•�r !n•�+r4!�•�1r�Ob�M�wiAfti.rl�s•• .... ..w+..« . tiw Permits for such mutters as foundations, seawall renovation and site. preparati will be issued, however, upon proper applications therefor , before such approval is required. 4. The Applicant shall provide landscape treatment for the easterly and of Chopin Plaza as a means of connecting the, Sayfront Walk with Bayfront Park, at least comparable to the dimensions of the Sayfront Walk,with maintenance by the Applicant. Final landscape plans are subject to the approval of the Planning Department and Parks Department. S. Subject to.obtaininq all necessary permits and approvals, in the event that a Downtown People Mover station is located at, or in the vicinity of, Biscayne Boulevard between SE 2nd and 3rd Avenues, then the Applicant shall provide an upper level pedestrian connection to the station. G. In the event that the developer is successful in acquiring ownership of at least three of the four blocks in adjacent DuPont Plaza, then the Applicant shall consider the provision of an upper level pedestrian connection from this project to the Applicant's future development in DuPont Plaza. Traffic Access and Parking 7. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, for parking and caclosed areas, (permits for such mutters u foundation,. seawall renovation and site preparari will be issued, however. upon proper applications therefor, before such apprav is required), the AppUcant.aball, using assumptions,, and generatLOn rates acc able to the Dade County Department of Traffic and Transportation ("County") ar_ South Florida Regional Planning Council ("council"), prepare and submit appro- priate data and documentation affirmatively demonstrating to the satisfactions Of the City of Miami Public Works and Planning Departments ("City") atmd tb* County acceptable interia improvements to allow zva&ays to "rats at letn"s . w of service acceptable to theCity and the County in the A.M. and P.K. Pe«o F�H•'i1w•wv a1..i ww•.. ',ri.tww ..,t fe+...� r...ti1 �_.._...__._. ,. ~ - ~ •; ...,•~• «. .. .. . . f • . ... ... w. n,~~i -...,. ~. =~i~~•S~'~~ ~..wr ~.~i ~i~~:~'•i.3~w.li~. .i'~..w~~~r.~~w.~+w.~..M~•.wr~wr•~.~..:~i:.~~. wi'~wrw: ~ ~• - n ~• / I~ . ~ ` •r' -: ~ data and doeumsntation shall also'inelvda projaetioas accaptabla *.. ~J~s c4ty _ th. Ceureil utd !ham Ceulfly ~atahli'hiaQ when imalesNn~ • ~ ...T. ...~ . • •. . •. . w • ~ a. i ,, ... .. •a.w ..qV.•.. f `_ .. .mss .~i, .... -- j°s~~~,..,.. ...._ ... ....~. ~ . - ~ ~+~'e~/~~ +M~ 1M~nw..w.w~.wV~...IT ~~..J.v.~ ""'w'" tw. .T.'YwyM.i'lLfSw Nr~~t./i- ' n.~ . . 4R.M~--' ~'~•~•~.~.w. mow.. . ..~.. • w. W:•.:.. .. .~ . ~ ~.. •` ~ r ~ 1` • w~ . • • • • . the County, such equitable share and bond that amount pith the City os the County. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for parking and enclosed areas (permits =' for ouch matters as foundations, seawall renovation and sits preparation will be issued, however, upon proper applications, therefor before such approval is required), the Applicant shall obtain a •eommiCneat on the part of the City sad the County tv implement the acceptable interim improvements by the time indicated by the projections. Copies of documents, data and commitments chall be sent to the Council and incorporated '~~. into the Application for Development Approval. ,' 8. The Applicant will fund the following improvements to Biscayne Boulevard along the site which are necessary to accommodate 8a11 Point traffic: provision of four traffic isaes on Biscayne Boulevard from the soueharnmost site access point to SE Zac'• Street sad will dedicate say property necessary for such improvements: removal of the island sear SE 3sd Street, provision of a traffic signal at SE 3rd Street, and adds- .. tioa of a second left turn lane northbound onto SE 2nd Street. If approved interim improvements, under 7 above, obviate the need for any of these improvements, such °~ improvemeata(s) shall not be required. { ;<< 9. The Applicant will reserve the land located west and south of the eastern ri ht-of-+wa ~' 8 Y of Biscayaa Boulevard extended, sad will dedicate that land to the appropriate govern- , meat agency if the land is required for construction of a Miami River crossing or, ~' 1a the event that such construction dace not proceed, vill dedicate that land to the City of Miami for a public purpose. ,: 10. The Applicant will e:egotiate as agrseffieat with the City of Miami, providing for 'two traffic lease on Chopin Plaza unobstructed by parking movements for adequate access to the hotel, with the balance of right-of-aay on Chopin Plaza devoted to parking, Miami River Bayfroat t~sik purposes at~d other approved uses. The applicant shall indemnify the Off-Street I'arkiag Authority for any loss of metered parking spacs~s attributable to providing adequate access to the hotel. ~ ,.. _- , . _ .. a- .. ., _ ., ... .. "4f~Ild~• ..•. :. .. a '~4~;A1i~.+~.r~.. s _ .. .. _. - - _ • - .~:- •~l..eow..• w . ..•ARI~ •• vwr.r't!`~T r .~«•.o••~•YI~".w-•.,.y.M,r~f~1r4!A~+wi+~M ~w7~ytiYi'tiwwl~...~~ ~.... a•.. • ...'. ..~ 1~: '.• 4 f • • t~ ~ r • • ~ ~ • i i ~. ' ~ ~.~..: 11. The 1-pplieant will provide at least the equivalent o! the spaces that would be required by the Dade County Zoning Code (Section 33-124(a)I !or seclusive use by condominium residents and quests. The Applicant may provide such parking supply thsough construction o! additional sell-parking lacilities~ through facility redesign: through design !or and provisions o!.`. valet parking, or a combination o! the above methods. Envisena+ental 12. The A;~plieant will report to the South Florida Regional Planniseq Council the` results o! its aiasine community survey before proceeding on seawall senovatto I! viable s~asine communities are detected, the Applicant will incorporate, in its Cospo o! Engineers poraeit application, measures to minimize ia~act o! seawall renovation on chess organisms. 13. The applicant will inlorm the Dade County Historic Survey o! the inception and timi,reep og excavation for the project. 14. The Applicant shall socrre a complex source permit prior to the inception o!' constructieA. 1S. This Developmeset Order shall be null and veld i! substantial deveis}~ment at.` the site teas not belua within two yoass o! the recorded dal: o! flee Deveio~_ order. 16. The Applicant will incorporate all additional intorsestian gequested by this':` Develoasent Order need revisions subaeitt~ed by the Applicant subsequent toy original submission o! the Application !mr Devel t rowel into +~ co+~- plot~ document and will provide copies in a tie~ly r to the St-uth F3.or#- teegional Planning Council, City o! tiiaei, bade County and the hate. ;. -~ .~wnr"4'ft r+-.. ~'1`4~'~1 „'r ~f'~.f':^^F. w. ~-h ... w w.^"nM1.. ~~. °.~.-f-."'j,e.r'~-"'~~"^~I'~.--. .. ..~ .. .r.. ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ .• . . . ~ ~ fM • '• , ~~ • •, . ~1 ~. ' . ,./ 17. The llpplicatioa !or Developau.t 7-ppsoval is iacorposated herein by selerenee and selied upon by the parties is disd~asgfaq their statutory duties uncles Chapter 9®0 Florida Statutes. Substantial oo~pliance with the representations eontained in the Applieatien ton Oseelop~nt 7-ppsoval is a condition dos approval unless valved or modified bt agseasant among • ~ • RESOLUTION NO. $ ~ ~ 7 ~ "r A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF t.4IAi!!I COMMISSION Ah{ENDING PARAGRAPH 7, EJOIIHYT "A" , RESOLUTION 79-396 ; MAY 24 ,1979 , 13E ING A DEVELOPMENT ORDER, APPROVING WITH MODIFICATIONS, THE HALL POINT (ldIAMI CENTER) PROJECT: 11HICI3 AMENDMENT REQUIRES AGREE6~ENT ON INTERII~1 TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY RATHER TITAN PRIOR TO THE ISSUA.*ICE OF A BUILDING PERMIT; FINDING THAT THIS AMENDMENT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION FROM THE TERWS OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER, AND FURTHER DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO SEND THIS RESOLUTION TO AFFECTED AGENCIES AND THE DEVELOPER. x 1PHEREAS, the City of Miami Commission by Resolution T9-396. dated biay 24, 1979 issued a Development Order, approv- fag with modifications, the Ball Point project, a Development of Regional Impact to be located on Tract D, DuPont Plaza (50-1i), and • RSEREAS, paragraph 7, Exhibit "A", of the Development Order requires the developer, Holywell Corporation, to submit documentation concerning the design and schedule for the imple- mentation of interim traffic improvements acceptable to the Citp o! Miami prior to the issuance o! a building permit, and 11HEREA3,.tt~e projected construction schedules !or the Ball Point pro~~eet, now known as Miami Center, and the ad3acent lour block DuPont Plaza area pose severe time and operating ~~cocuti~E~T ~ °ocx `, constraints in the interim period, and ~T~ N® ~ `' ~~ A'HEREAS . a DuPont Plaza Task Force representing' a"~"yL EY1~°~@d ~ private and public agencies, was appointed Septeffier 8, 1980 by k the Transpo~°tation Planning Council of the Metropolitan Planning i Organization to expeditiously recorarrend a schedule of implementa- tion !or interim and final tratlic improvements to Public agencies ~t~li~ ~ MIS' ~-;"~' S~ ~~ "~`, ~5-~.. and private entities, and, RHEREAS, the Conenissioa lands that it is is the public interest to continue to assure overall public and private ' , coordination and participation in interim and final traffic ,a4lutions in the DuPont Plaza area by providing that Holyaell Corporation reach agreement on interim traffic improvements _ prier to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy rather than a building permit;. NOW , THEREFORE , HE IT RESOLVED BY THE C011QlI33IOdd OF THE CITY OF !!iIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. Paragraph 7, Exhibit "A", Resolution ?9-396; uay 24, 19?9, being a Development Order, approving with modifications, the Ball Point _ (!-tiami Center) pro3ect is bereby aaeaded in the following particulars:l~ '• Traffic Access and Parkins ?. Prior to the issuance of a tiY#Ae#ag-pvew#s, certificate of occupancy, for parking sad enclosed areas, (permits for such atatters as foundation, seawall renovation and site prep- oration will be issued, however, upon proper applications therefor, before such approval is required), the Applicant shall, using assumptions, and generation rates acceptable • _ to the Dade County Department of Traffic sad Transportation ("County") and to South Florida Regional Planning Council ("Council"), Prepare -~ds andJo figurers stricken shall be deleted. Underscored Nords and/or figures constitute the a~nendm+ent proposed. The remaining provisions are dow in effect sad remain unchanged. and submit appropriate data and documentation s!lirmatively demonstrating to the satisfac- tion o! the City of lRiuni Public Works and Planning Impartments ("City") and the County acceptable interim improvements to al1Ma road- ways to gperate at levels of service acceptable to the City and the County in the A.g. aad P.M. peak hours pending the completion.of final traffic improvements. The data and documenta- tion shall also include projections acceptable to the City, the Council and the County establish- ing when implementation of interim solutions shall be required in whole or in part. Such projections shall be reviewed annually after beginning of occupancy and, when appropriate, modified by the City, the Council and the County. The Applicant shall pay its equitable share o! the cost of imple- menting the acceptable interim improvements. Prior to the issuance of a b~t~~d~ag-pacts#e certificate of occupancy for parking and enclosed areas (permits !or such matters as foundation, seawall renovation sad site preparation will be issued, however, upon proper applications therefor before such approval ,, be issued, however, upon proper applications, therefor before such approval is required), the Applicant shall obtain a commitment on the part o! the City and the County to implement the .acceptable interim improvements by the time ~ ~ ~~~ indicated by the pro3ections. Copies of docu- ~V~:sJ~r:...1 ~ 1 ~ meats, data and commitments shall~be sent to FOLLC~1r'V" the Council and incorporated into the Applica- . Lion for Development Approval." Section 2. The City o! Miami Commission lands that this aiaendment to paragraph 7(above) does not constitute a sub- stantial deviation from the terms o! the Development Order a~Jproved by the City of Miami Commission bq Resolution 79-396 dated ~aay 24 , 1979. Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to immediately. send certified copies of this Resolution to the Florida Department o! Community Affairs, Division of Local Resource Naosgement, 2571 Executive Center Circle East, Tallahassee, -- Florida 32301; to the South Florida Regional Planning Council, ,~~`~ 1515 NW 167th Street, Suite 429, Miami, Florida, and to the Holyaeil Corporation, 11 DuPont Circle, Suite 100, Washington, y t- D. C. 20036. .~ r .s W ~,,.„.,~,~ r _ ,,. =. EXHIBIT "R" Attached ta, and made a part of Resolution September 25, 1986 DEVELOPMENT ORDER (AS AMENDED SEPTEMBER 25, 1986) let it be known that pursuant to Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes the Commission of the City of Miami Florida has considered in public hearing held on May 24, 1979 the issuance of Development Order for Ball Point, a Development of Regional Impact to be located in the City of Miami, and has considered in public hearing held on September 25, 1986, the issuance of an amended Development Order for the Miami Center I 'project (A/K/A Ba11 Point Project) a Development of Regional Impact, located in the City of Miami. Pursuant to Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes and after due consideration of the consistency .of this proposed development with pertinent regulations, and the Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council dated February 4, 1986, the Commission took the following action: Approval of this development, as amended, with the following modifications concerning and limited to that portion of the development located on the southern (3.01 acres) portion of Tract 0, Block 1, DUPONT PLAZA (50-11) hereinafter referred to as "One DuPont Plaza" (F/K/A f. Biscayne Plaza) (Exhibit "F"): Development 1. Condition 1, as it applies solely to the southern portion known as One 'i . DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza), Exhibit A, Resolution 79-396; May 24, 1979 is hereby amended in the following respects: "One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) is limited to a pro3ect - containing not more than (See Figures 1, 2 and 3 attached in the appendix): Phase 1 Component Un1ts/Syaces Area (Gross Square Feet) Office Tower 700,000 z (722' NGYD + 65' Antenna) i T. Commercial 160,000 ~ Note: All language in Exhibit "B" following Condition 1 is new language; constituting a ma3or amendment to the Development Order. While underlining has not been used; all language in Exhibit "B" should be ~' interpreted as if it were underlined. For clarity only, those conditions which were considered by the Planning Advisory Board on June 18 and re,)ected, but reinstated by the ~'~ City Commission by Motian 86-520; June 26, 1986, are shown in bold - type. Other minor changes e.g. conditions 17b and 25b, since the June ~: ,. 26, 1986 City Commmission hearing are also shown in bold type. . , t: 3; Page 1 of 17 - ~~ , .F ' d . -.a: ... Residential (in office tower) Parking Sub-Total Phase 2 Office Tower (884' NGVD + 65' Antenna) Commercial Residential (in office tower) {,:. ;~, 120,000 __ 60 units 980,000 1,200 spaces 90 units 780,000. 60,000 180,000 Sub-Total ~~~~ 3. ~; n Total (excluding parking)* 2'400=000 *Note: Parking is equivalent to 600,000 square feet The project is subject to schematic design drawings (Sheets 1-13) dated January 21, 1986, as amended by drawings dated May 2, 1986 submitted by Schleicher-Soper, Architects, wherein 6 floors of residential are shown on the Phase I tower and 9 floors of residential are shown in the Phase 2 tower. r 1~: - Office uses may be substituted for these residential uses, at the option of the Applicant, without such action being considered a substantial deviation, subject to the approval of the Miami City Commission. .; Each Office Tower may include at the option of the Applicant a health club (1 ~ Y s floor); a restaurant (1 floor); an executive club (1 floor); a restaurant, and ~x cabaret on the top of the podium (on the roof or 11th floor), and a tower. observation center/skytop cafe, provided that these certain uses are included in - the computation of "Catmercial" above. The rink and roof garden on the podium level are considered open space. ``' The project has been recommended for approval, in principle, by the Urban Development Review Board, on January 28, 1986, with the recommendation that at the time of issuance of Class C Permit, the project shall again be reviewed by the Urban Development Review Board. The project has been exempted from the requirements of the Metro Dade County = Shoreline Development Review Ordinance (Metro Dade County Ordinance 8514) by letter of January 17, 1986. Page 2 of 17 ,.. ,~ ,.-~ • • The Atlanta Office, Federal Aviation Administration has no ob3ection,-if--the height of the building plus antenna is 899' MSL per letter of February 7, 1986; the Oade County Aviation Department has no objection if the height of the building plus antenna is 949' MSL. Therefore, no permit will be issued for buildings and antennae on the site whose height would exceed 899' MSL unless the Atlanta office of the Federal Aviation Agency states, in writing that they have no objection to a height of 949' MSL, in which instance the height of buildings and antennae on the site are limited to 949' MSL. On June 2, 1986, the Miami Zoning Board granted a variance from the off-street truck loading bay requirements of Section 2023, Zoning Ordinance 9500. The Applicant will supply 3 of 10 required bays 12' x 35' x 15' in size and 4 of 8 required bays 12' x 55' x 15' in size (of phich three (3) are to be built in Phase I and one is to be built in Phase 2.). The Applicant proposes to lease 600 parking spaces should a parking structure be built on an adjacent vacant block in the DuPont Plaza. A grant of special exception for off-street parking per CBD-1 zoning district, of Zoning Ordinance 9500 from the Miami Zoning Board and a Class C Permit may be necessary, should such a parking structure be proposed for construction. THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, ANO/OR ASSIGNS JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY SHALL: Environment 2. Remove all invasive exotic plants from the project site as the site is • cleared, and use only those plant species specified in Attachment 1 in future project landscaping. 3. Have a professional archaeologist on-site during all earthwork, notify State and County archaeologists of construction schedules, delay Construction up to three months in any area where potentially significant historic or archaeological artifacts are uncovered, and for a reasonable time and in a manner calculated to minimize any interference with Construction, permit State and local historic preservation officials to - survey and excavate the site. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for Phase 1, provide funds ,on deposit or a performance bond in the amount of X500,000, and construct, ' using the Applicants` funds, and complete prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy far One OuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase • 1, the Riverwalk and provide furniture, lighting and landscaping pursuant Page 3 of 17 ,: ~~~' . -.~.-.~J.,. - - _..~, k .. .. ~ _ }[, - ,. - A r to City of Miami Riverwalk and 6aywalk Guides and Standards , (the Guidelines) in effect at the time of adoption of this Development Order. n The Applicant will design the Riverwalk and adjacent private space to - allow views and access from private establishments, while fostering appropriate public use of the Riverwalk. Final landscape plans for the Riverwalk are sub~eet to the approval of the Planning Department, in Consultation with the Fire Department, prior to the issuance of a building _ permit. The~Applicant shall incorporate, in Phase 1 of One DuPont Plaza '` (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza), a minimum of 20,000 gross square feet of sidewalk cafes, restaurants and other retail uses in the area immediately adjacent to the Riverwalk (area already included in area computations of Condition 1). At the onset of Phase II, the City will reinstitute the requirement of a performance bond in the amount of E500,000. to guarantee that the Riverwalk, if damaged by construction, will be repaired. (The Riverwalk easement and perpetual maintenance agreement have been previously required in Condition 3, Exhibit "A" of the original Development Order dated May 24, 1979 (attached). • 5. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 1, provide funds or a performance bond in the amount of $500,000 and construct, using the Applicants funds, and complete prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 1, a landmark focal point including, for example, a water feature, significant artwork, landscaping, lighting and furniture adjacent to the entrance to the project fronting S. Biscayne Boulevard (extended) subject to the approval of the Planning Department in an aa+ount approxiasately but not less than $500,000, it being understood that said landmark focal point is of direct benefit to the project in ameliorating • the bulk of the project and providing pedestrian amenities. The Applicant is to provide perpetual maintenance. (Dedication is required pursuant to Condition 9, Exhibit "A" of the original Development Order dated May 24, 1979 (attached). 6. Contribute $1 million to the City toward the irovement of Bayfront Park prior to the issuance of a building ~servait for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 1; it being understood that said park improvea~nt is of direct benefit to the project in liorating the apparent buck of the pro~eet and to provide pedestrian and open space amenities for the occupants of the project as. well as the public (see Attachment 2). _ Page 4 of 17 n i 1 i 7. Design, construct, and maintain the stormwater management system to meet the following standards: Ouring the construction of One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza), place rip~rap, temporary berms or other barriers to prevent discharge of construction-related runoff to the Bay. Construct permanent berms or barriers, at least one foot above grade, along the eastern and southern perimeter of the site. Retain the runoff from a 25-year storm on-site, and construct the project drainage system in accordance with all representations in the amended Application for Development Approval. Route any and all parking area washdown water through oil and grease interceptors to a sanitary sewerline or prohibit any and all washdown of project parking garages. 8. Incorporate into the development, by restrictive covenant and lease or sales agreements, hazardous materials accident prevention, mitigation, and response standards. At a minimum, these standards shall: Require that areas within buildings where hazardous materials or hazardous wastes are to be used, generated, or stored shall be - ~ Constructed with impervious floors, without drains, to ensure containment and facilitate cleanup of any spill or leakage. Require that the loading/unloading of any hazardous material or hazardous waste shall occur in a covered loading/unloading dock with a spill containment area not connected to the project drainage or sewer system. Prohibit any outside storage of hazardous materials or hazardous waste. Require all hazardous waste generators to contract with a licensed public or private hazardous waste disposal service or processing facility and to provide to the Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) copies of one of the following forms of documentation of proper hazardous waste management practices: - a hazardous waste manifest; - proof of shipment to a permitted hazardous waste management facility; or - a confirmation of receipt of materials from a recycle or a waste exchange operation. Notify any tenant generating wastes of the penalties for improper disposal of hazardous waste pursuant to Section 403.727, Florida Statutes. Page 5 of 17 .~,.._,.___~_r_~~_.~._._._ . •A11ow reasonable access to records and facilities for monitoring b,~c..the City, the Dade County GERM, and the Florida Department of Enviranmentai Regulation to assure compliance with this Development Order, and ail applicable laws and regulations. For the purposes of this Dev@lopment Order a hazardous waste generator shall be defined as the Applicant and any tenant of the Applicant that fails under a SIC code listed in Attachment 3 attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and that uses, stores, or generates hazardous wastes. Hazardous wastes are defined as ignitable, corrosive, toxic, qr reactive wastes, including those identified in Attachment 4; provided, however, that the uses in Attachment 3 and the wastes in Attachment 4 shall be simultaneously amended upon the addition or deletion ' of any or all of the listed uses, materials, or wastes by amendment to the "County and Regional Waste Assessment Guidelines" incorporated 'by reference into Rule 17-31.03(21), Florida Administrative Code. Safety and Security 9. Prior to issuance of a building permit for One DuPont Plata (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase I, enter into an agreement with the City to contribute a fair share for capital facilities required to provide adequate fire service to the project if required by the City, or, in the alternative, pay a fair share contribution pursuant to an adopted City impact fee ordinance pertaining to fire service, if such impact fee ordinance is adopted by the City prior to obtaining certificate of occupancy for more than 980,000 gross square feet of development or, in the alternative, if such impact fee is adopted by the City within the next 5 years whichever is earlier (excluding e~s#.iag development on ~i#.e Miami Center existing). 10. Collaborate with the City of Miami Fire Department to ensure that appropriate fire safety measures are incorporated into the project design - and construction, through the approval of construction documents by the Fire Marshal. 11. Collaborate with the City of Miami Police Department to incorporate adequate security measures and systems into the design and operation of the project. The Applicant will submit the preliminary drawings prepared ~.. r-~~-r-~-- ^----- .. ..~ .Aff^ _. __~.-JsJ L-- ~ ~' drarings dAted May 2, 1986, to the Police Department within 180'days of the effective date of this Development Order. The Police~0epartment may request more detailed construction documents and, at their option, may prepare a safety and security report. The Applicant shall respond to the Planning Department, in writing, how and to what extent the recommendations of the Police Department have been incorporated into the design construction and operation of the project, prior to the issuance of any building permit. 12. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 1, enter into an agreement with the Police Department to contribute a fair share of police capital facilities needed to resolve City concerns, as determined by the City, or, in the alternative, pay a fair share contribution pursuant to an adopted City impact fee ordinance pertaining to police facilities, if such impact fee ordinance is adopted by the City prior to obtaining certificates of occupancy for more than 980,000 gross square feet of development (excluding development on Miami Center existing) or, in the alternative, if such impact fee is adopted by the City within the next 5 years, whichever is earlier, 13. Provide interior and roof space on either or both of the towers, during and as part of the initial construction of One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza), if required by the City, for a communications antenna and supporting structure for the City's emergency communication system. Said antenna and appurtenances, together with necessary services shall be at City of Miami expense. The Applicant shall retain the right of _, architectural structural and engineering approval and said antenna shall not exceed the FAA approved height. Energy Conservation 14. Incorporate the following energy conservation measures into the development: a. Maximum flexibility of air conditioning systems to cool only occupied areas (on a floor-by-floor basis at minimum). b. Air distribution using variable air volume systems, if feasible. c. Minimum air conditioning energy efficiencies (EER) of 10.0 in buildings less than or equal to 250,000 square feet, and 12.0 in .buildings over 250,000 square feet. Page 7 of 17 M, . ~ ; ~~ ,~; d. Heat producing areas and equipment (cooking, water heating, etc.) isolated from air conditioned areas. e. Computerized elevator control system in all structures over 10 stories. f. Natural gas or other non-electric energy sources for cooking and water heating in restaurants, where feasible. g. Solar water heaters or waste heat recovery units to preheat cooking and washing hot water in restaurants, etc., where feasible. h. Hot water temperatures set at or below 105oF where allowed by health codes and equipment requirements. i. Lavatory water flow of 0.8 gallons per minute or less than water closets that use no more than three and one-half gallons per flush. 3. Tinted glass to reduce the amount of direct sunlight entering air conditioned areas. k. Light-reflecting and/or light colored wall and roof surfaces, with solar absorption coefficients less than or equal to 0.50. 1. Electrical metering on a floor-by-floor basis. m. Computerized energy management system capab]e of start/stop optimization, demand lighting, lighting control, and zonal control. A statement showing the extent of design compliance with these criteria from the engineer(s) responsible for the design of the mechanical, plumbing and electrical systems shall be filed prior to the issuance of a building permit for each phase of One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza). Traffic Access and Circulation 15. Incorporate the following into the project design and operation to `` minimize the cumulative impact of project traffic, and its associated pollutant emissions, on air quality: Designate .three percent of on-site employee parking spaces, located as close as possible to elevator and building entrances, for exclusive >: carpool or vanpo~l use. Actively encourage and promote car and van pooling by establishing a Car pool information program. Provide Metrorail, f9etrobus, and Metromover route and schedule information in convenient locations throughout the pro,~ect. 16. In the event that the Applicant leases parking spaces in a parking garage to be constructed in any of the three vacant blocks in DuPont Plaza, ~ a Page 8 of 17 ~ `~~ ~` 17a. Replat.the southern 3.01 acres of Tract 0, Block i, DuPont Plaza (50-11) prior to obtaining building permits for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 1, subject to the• normal requirements for subdivision improvements. The Applicant will dedicate all necessary easements and rights-of-way which are located on the southern portion of Tract D, Block 1, DuPont Plaza (i.e., the One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) property) which are far One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) and which are required by the City, County, or State in order to construct required transportation improvements made necessary by One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza), including the second-level pedestrian system referred to in Condition 16 above, if constructed. parking garage or other building is constructed on the opposite•s~d! of Biscayne Boulevard from the project, then subject to a grant of special exception by the Miami Zoning Board for the parking garage, the Applicant• shall fund, design and construct an upper level pedestrian connection across S. Biscayne Boulevard, between the One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) project and said parking garage or other building located on the Opposite side of Biscayne Boulevard, subject to the recommendation of the City•of Miami Department of Public Works and subject to the issuance of a special permit by the Miami City Commission specifying physical clearances and amounts of public liability insurance to be provided by the Applicant, The Applicant is responsible for filing a covenant to this effect to be recorded effective with the effective date of this Development Order. [See also Condition 6, Exhibit "A" of the original Development Order, as amended (attached)]. 17.b. within 1$0 days of the date of issuance of the Oevetopment Order, the Applicant is to present an traffic analysis demonstating that the FDOT- approved Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp system (Figure 4) will accommodate the projected traffic for Biscayne Plaza, both Phase 1 and 2, Said traffic analysis subject to the approval of FDOT in writing. (Notes This repair nt has been satisfied because of the letter from the Florida Department of Transportation dated June 24, l9$6.) 17c. Prior to obtaining any building permits for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza), in the event that construction of the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System has not begun, fund or construct 100 percent of the interim roadway improvements identified as A(1), A(2), A(3) Page 9 of 17 ~ ~ and~A(4) in Attachment 5 (or suitable replacements mutually agreed~upoit by the City's Department of Public Works, Applieant, Dade County Department of Public Works, FDOT, and SFRPC staff), to the City, pursuant to s. 380.06(15)(e)2, Florida Statutes. 17d. In the event that the current Florida Department of Transportation approved design for the I~95 Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System (Figure 4) is superseded by the proposed Downtown Development Authority Alternative (Figure 5), fund a fair share of the incremental costs or receive a eredit for any incremental savings (See Condition 17g) (See Attachment. 7). If the Applicant's proposed modifications (Figure 6) are approved, fund the following items: Applicant . Item Cost Fair Share A. FDOT Plan changes arising - 100x froe following three Applicant modifications (Figure 6) . 6. Plus the following additional items: - 1) Conversion of Ramp t 80,000 S 80,000 Embankment 2) Service Road ; 55,000 S 55,000 ' 3) Geometric Modifications S 3,000 S 3,000 of SE 2nd Avenue/ Biscayne Boulevard Way Intersection ;T~'$; ~6-+ 3T~';~d'-+ (but riot . less than the erz FDOT bid award4 whisb6v8+~~ y+aea~) In thin event,(i.e. Applicant's three proposed modifications in Figure 6 are constructed) funds. shall be made available in a timely manner, prior to the FOOT bid award for the selected bifurcated Ramp System; prior to issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy for One DuPont Plaaa {F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase I, or by January 1, 1990, whichever is earliest pursuant to s. 380.06(15)(e)2 Florida Statutes. i7e. Prior to obtaining either a Certificate of Occupancy of any kind for Phase I or a building permit for Phase 2, fund fair share of local surface street improvements identified in the current FDOT approved design for the I~»g5 Page 10 of 17 w c poMmtown Distributor 9ifurcated Ramp System (Figure Q) or a).in _the proposed DDA Alternative (Figure 5) or b) the Applicant's proposed modifications (Figure f) as and if approved by FDOT pursuant to s. 380.OG(15)(e)2 Florida Statutes. The Applicant's fair share shall be based pro-rata on traffic generated by the existing Miami Center I project, Southeast Financial Center, traffic attributed to development in the vacant 3 blocks of DuPont Plaza equivalent to that approved by the City in the expired Miami Center II Development Order, and One DuPont Plata (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phases 1 and 2 separately. No Certificate of Occupancy will be issued for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 2 unless these fair share funds have been used for .surface street improvements abutting the project and said improvements have been completed. 17f. If a public sector financing package has not been committed prior to December 31, 1991, then prior to obtaining any building permits for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 2, fund, bond, or provide a letter of credit in the amount of :517,000 (1985 dollars) to the FDOT or, in the alternative, loan said amount to FOOT, if acceptable to FOOT, as the Applicant's fair share contribution to the 19,763,000 Brickell Avenue Miami River Bridge replacesent, pursuant to Section 380.06 (l5)(e)2 F.S. i7g. If a public sector financing package has not been cos~aitted prior to pecesber 31, 1991, then prior to obtaining any building permits for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 2, fund, bond, or provide a letter of credit in the amount of Y5,027,O00 (1985 dollars) to FOOT or, in the alternative, loan said amount to FDOT, if acceptable to FDOT, as the Applicant's fair share contribution to the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Rasp Systes, whose total cost is estimated at :56 Billion (1985 dollars), pursuant to Section 380.05(15)(e)2 F.S. Minority Participation 18. Within 6 months of the effective date of this Development Order, prepare a Minority Construction Contractors/Subcontractors Participation Plan and Submit it for comment only to the City's Minority Procurement Officer, who will compare it with the ob,)ectives of Ordinance 10062, the Minority Procurement Ordinance. 19. Within 6 months from the effective date of this Development Order prepare a Minority Participation and Employment Plan and submit it for comment Page it of 17 1-'~ •,~ :.:.- e,..:m.,_..,-..w~.....~, _.._. ~-„a^sn`'..~s=~:nneRU...: ... ...K ~ , '. ~ .;; .: _-_~.m. q .:._..,~w~~b r...u.~a-a;~,......~ ~J..+<.... -_ only. to the City's Minority Procurement Officer, who will compare -it-v~ith the objectives Of Ordinance 10062, the Minority Procurement Ordinance. ral 20. Integrate all original and supplemental ADA information into a consolidated Application for Development Approval (CADA) and submit two copies of the CADA to the Council, one copy to the City, and one copy to the Florida Department of Community Affairs within thirty (30) days of the effective date of the Development Order. The CADA shall be prepared as follows: a. Where new, clarified, or revised information has been prepared subsequent to submittal of the ADA but prior to issuance of the 00, whether in response to a formal statement of information needed or otherwise, the original pages of the ADA will be replaced with revised 21. 22. pages. b. Revised pages will have a "Page Number (R) - Date" notation, with "Page Number" being the number of the original page, "(R)" indicating that the page was revised, and "Date" stating the date of the revision. Within 30 days of the effective date of this Development Order, record the Miami Center I Development Order with the Clerk, Oade County Circuit Court, pursuant to Section 380.06(14)(d), Florida Statutes (1985), Specifying that the Development Order Exhibit "A" runs with the entire Site and that Exhibit "B" runs with the southern portion of Tract 0, DUPONT PLAZA (50-11) (AKA One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phases 1 and 2) and is binding on Miami Center Joint Venture, its successors, and/or assigns, 3ointly or severally. Submit an annual report to the South Florida Regional Planning Council, City, and Florida Department of Community Affairs on each anniversary Of the effective date of the Development Order, which report shall include, at a minimum: a. A complete response to each question in Attachment 6. b. Identification and description of any changes in the plan of development, or in the representations contained in the ADA, or in the phasing for the reporting year and for the next year. c. A summary comparison of development activity proposed and actually conducted for the year. Page 12 of 17 ~ #~~ '"' ~- ~~ ;..._. a d.••Identification of undeveloped tracts of land, other than in~ivi'dual - single family lots, that have been sold to a separate entity or developer. e. Identification and intended use of lands purchased, leased or optioned by the developer adjacent to the project site since the Development Order was issued. f. An assessment of the Applicant's and the local government's compliance with the conditions of approval contained in the ORI Development Order and the commitments which are contained in the Application for Development Approval. g. Specification of any amended ORI Application for Development Approval or requests for a substantial deviation determination that were filed in the reporting year and to be filed during the next year. h. An indication of a change, if any, in local government jurisdiction for any portion of the development since issuance of the Development Order. i. A list of significant local, state and federal permits which have been obtained or which are pending by agency, type of permit, permit number, and purpose of each. ~. A statement that all persons have been sent copies of the annual report in conformance with subsections 380.06(14) and (16), Florida Statutes. k. A copy of any recorded notice of the adoption of the Development Order or any subsequent modification that was recorded by the Applicant pursuant to Subsection 380.06(14)(d), Florida Statutes. 1. Copies of one of the following documentations of appropriate disposal of all hazardous waste: a hazardous waste manifest, a bill of lading from a bonded hazardous waste transporter indicating shipment to a licensed hazardous waste facility, or a confirmation of receipt of material from a recycler, a waste exchange operation, or other permitted hazardous waste management facility. m. For any condition that cannot reasonably be monitored as part of the local permitting and inspection processes, a notarized affidavit assuring compliance with such Development Order conditlons shall be included. ~~e ~ ~ n.•Any other information required by the Department of Community Affiair - (DCA) in accordance with Section 380.06(14 and (16), Florida Statutes (1985) . • ~.x_ :,~o. ti ,;, THE CITY SHALL 23. Hereby designate the Planning Director to monitor compliance with ail conditions of this Development Order. Specific monitoring procedures include: Review end evaluation of the annual report to be submitted by the Applicant by Condition 22 herein; and Review of Development Order conditions prior to a recommendation that a building permit or Certificate of Occupancy be issued by the City pursuant to Condition 28 'herein. 24. Hereby incorporate the One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 1 and 2 timeline (Figure 7), which timeline will be used by the Planning Director in monitoring specific conditions of the Development Order as they relate to city permitting for specific components or phases; provided, however, that deviations from the timeline shalt not be construed to be substantial deviations from the terms of this Development Order, 25a. Mithhold building permits or Certificates of Occupancy, as the case may be, until the requirements of Conditions 4, S, 6 and 17a have been met. 25b. Withhold any building permits unti] the traffic analysis in Condition 17b is approved by FDOT, in writing. The absence of FOOT approval will trigger a question of substantial deviation from the terms of this -, Development Order, (Motes This require~aent has been satisfied because of the letter from the Florida Departa~ent of Transportation dated June 24, 7986.) 25c. Pursuant to Section 360.06(15)(e)2, Florida Statutes, withhold issuance of Certificates of Occupancy for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) until al] interim road improvements identified in Attachrt~ent 5 are Constructed as required by Condition 17c. 25d. Withhold any Certificate of Occupancy for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 1, if funds have not been supplied for Applicant's fair share of the modifications pursuant to Condition 17d if a) the proposed Downtown Development Authority Alternative (Figure 5) with or without b) the Applicant's proposed modifications (Figure 6}, are accepted. Page 14 of 17 •- ~ ,,,~~ ~~ ,,~~„ .. 25e. ___y. Withhold any Certificate of Occupancy for One OuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase i and building permits for Phase 2 if Applicant's fair share funds for local street improvements, required by Condition 17e have not been deposited; no Certificate of Occupancy will be issued far One OuRont Piaaa (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 2, unless the above-deposited funds have been applied to construction of the local street improvements abutting the project and said improvements have been completed. The City shal'1 apply the Applicant's fair share funds to streets abutting the project but--the City does not guarantee the completion of these improvements. • 25f. If a public sector financing package has not been committed prior to Oecember 31, 1991, withhold issuance of any building permits for One OuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 2 until the Applicant funds, bonds, or provides a letter of credit in the amount of E517,000 to FDOT or, in•the alternative, loans said amount to FOOT, if acceptable to FOOT, pursuant to Condition 17f. The City does not guarantee the completion of this ieiprovement. 25g. If a public sector financing package has not been committed by December 31, 1991, withhold issuance of any building permits for the One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 2 until the Applicant funds bonds, or provides a letter of credit in the amawnt of :5,027,000 to FDOT or, in the alternative, loans said amount to FDOT, if acceptable FDOT, pursuant to Condition 17g. The City does not guarantee the completion of this improvement. 25h. Withhold issuance of any building permits for the One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A _ Biscayne Plaza) Phase 2 portion of the pro3ect until a) construction has commenced on (i.e., upon execution of a contract for construction of) the ;; Downtown Distributor bifurcated Ramp System and b) the FOOT scheduled completion date for the Ramp System occurs prior to the scheduled completion date of Phase 2. 26. Hereby, stipulate that this pro3ect shall be subject to an impact fee ordinance applicable to the Omni/Downtown/Brickell area, if such ordinance is adopted by the City within 5 years of the effective date of this Development Order, to be paid at the time of issuance of any building permit, provided, however, that funds, (but not loans) required by conditions of this Development Order shall be off-setting eredits against. • Page 15 of 17 ,~ :, -_~~ ~_ a :_. separate categories of the impact fees, further provided that nd mound - - ...~... _ ~, will be made if i;he funds, (but not loans) required by conditions of this Development Order, cumulatively exceed the amount that would other-wise be paid under the separate categories in the impact fee ordinance. 27. Hereby stipulate that for a 5-year period commencing with the effective - date of this~Development Order, no application for rezoning the southernly 3.01 acres of Tract 0, Block i, DuPont Plaza (50-11) will be accepted administratively which a) further restricts the uses allowed; b) reduces the amount of development (square foot area) or intensity (Floor Area Ratio) or c) reduces the density (number of dwelling units or parking spaces) -provided in this Oevelopment Order; further provided, however, that upon a finding that substantial changes have occurred in the conditions underlying the bevelopment Order; or that the Development Order ' is based on substantially inaccurate information provided by the Applicant in the amended Application for Development Approval, or that a change is clearly established to be essential to the public health, safety or welfare, the ,City may downzone the property, further provided that the - City may otherwise adopt zoning regulations which do not restrict uses, or reduce density or intensity and other ordinances essential to the public health, safety and welfare which may affect this property. 28. Hereby stipulate that the following actions considered by the South Florida Regional .Planning Council in their Report and Recommendations dated February 4, 1986, may be undertaken at the Applicant's option and written notice to the Planning Director with an exception, and will not be considered to be substantial deviations from the terms of this Development Order: Substitution of up to 300,000 square feet of office or use for an equivalent amount of residential use upon the approval of the Miami City Commission, or Relocation or transfer of restaurants, health clubs cabarets and other `j retail uses and floor areas described in the ADA among the podium or towers of Phases 1 and 2 provided all such commercial space cumulatively doES not exceed 220,000 square feet, or Addition to, or deletion of, up to five (5) percent of the gross floor area of either Phases i or 2, provided that the cumulative totals of additions and deletions conforms to the parameters in Condition 1. Page 16 of 17 :~' __ o~ ............ Deletion of up to ten (10) percent of the gross floor area of each COOt~onent cif either phases 1 or 2, s• in Condition 1 fQr Phase 1 or 2 ~e-pa~ - if the total project is reduced by ten (10) percent such reduction shall be proportionate a~aong said Ca~ponents. Substitution of the a) ODA modification (Figure 5) or b) the Applicants modifications (Figure 6.) to the FDOT approved Downtown Distribution Bifurcated Ramp System (Figure 4), as and if approved by FDOT, subject to applicable provisions of Conditions i7d and 17g. Delays or advances in the timeline specified in Condition 24. 29. Stay the .effectiveness of this Development Order - Exhibit•"B" - if One - DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase l is not under construction within three (3) years from the effective date of this Development Order. "Construction" is defined as the issuance of a foundation building permit and completion of construction allowed by the foundation permit; "effective date" is defined as forty-five (45) days after issuance of this Development Order by the Miami City Commission. In such an event no development permits thereunder shall be granted, until such time as an Amended ADA, providing updated information, is submitted to the Council, City, and State and an Amended Development Order issued. Should the Development Order be stamped pursuant to this Condition and an amended Application for Development Approval as herein provided is not submitted • within one year after such stay is imposed, this Development Order - Exhibit "B" - shall expire and shall thereafter have no further force or effect. Exhibit "A" of this Development Order continues to run with the land. 5~~ • ~ _~,r_~ ~~ ~, EXHIBIT "C" Attached t©, and glade a pa~°t o1' Resolution OEVELOPMEAIT Qf REGIOHAI IMPACT ASS SMENT MIAMI TER I Locetec i n M1 aai i 23.07 ScUrl~ I S, i \ i ..- .. _ ~Y ~p ~_ ~. ~ south florida r~ Tonal tannin council ~ ~ g p g ~~ 3Gd0 ^~C~rywCOC CivC. swr8 '~; ~CiI~w00v' "CnC.: 33Ci~ rtCvvt;:tG ~3CS; CC~~//'~~•2CC~ `•,~/~~ V`v•~~vV - , February d. 1986 _ • i The Monorabls Xavier Suarez • Mayor. City of Miami ~ 3'S00 Pan Mier t can Or i ve Mfamf, Florida 33133 ~ Oear Mayor Suarez: t The South Florida Regional Planning Go~cil-has otticiaily adopted the ' enclosed Regional Impact report for the Miami Center 1 IM~ended ADA ano tOraarded copies to the Florida pepartment of Community Affairs, sna the South Ftorida tester Msnsgement 0l strict. This report is.provided for your .use in reviewing the tevelopment of Regional Impact purwant to Section 381).06, Florida Statutes. ~ Mhile the start of the Council is available to assist Tn the resolution ' of any matter regarding the report, the Council has no Iegal mechanism through +rhicg it can act on this report again, except t!srough apptal procedures. Recent changes to Section 380. Q6, Florida Statutes. and Rule 9J-2.2S. • Florida I-dministrafiive Cone, are nos effective and reCuire changes to ano set criteria for local government Oevelopment Qrders. For example, 380.06ttS)6te), F.S.. nos requires that: "local goverr~ents shall not approve a development of regional impact that does not make adequate provision for public taciltties neede0 to accamn+ooate the tmRacts of the proposed oeveiopment, unless the local ~vernonent includes in the development ®roer e Commitnoent by the local ~vern~nent to provide these ~ taci l sties i consistent with development schedule approved in the development oroer ..." • ! Ptease rev lea t:euncil reccendatiens. Section 380.06, F. S.t1985), ano ' Rule 9J•Z.ZS. F.A.C., caretully prior to issuance of the Mi~1i Center I Mended Development Qrder. Copies of any development order issued with regard to trots project must be transl~itteO to the South Florida Regional Planning Council end the i Florida Departn9ent of Cd~snunity Rffair$, shish have d5 Days ttsereatter to make an appeal decision based on whet!rer the Co~ty~s development Order is consistent with the Council's report and recommendations and other rewtrements of the Taro. ~ - ;~ t .., _• _. , ~ '~ ,. - _ _ - _ ~ .... aj4 ~_ z~.. ~~: ~ - .;_ . .. iii: ;~ ' s The Flonorab l e Xavier Suares .. Page 2 FeDrwry a, 1986 ,,,: _ - - . ~ R~ It we esn be of further assistsnce, ptesse ealt. ~~~~ Sincerely, ' / ~~ ~~ ~5 ~. j4: ~ " Ane Oe i s+er .': Y ~: interim Exeeutive Director ~• 5s AO/mk ~~' - ~:. ` f ~- Enc t osure ~~ ee: Sergio Rodrigues John l.efley Ethan Minksy. Eiq. LN RaMI inson icy Kensie Ted Gouid - Oavid C. Rhinard Peut Soper. Jr. Rus:eti wirtn. Jr. Jeff 8ereor. Esq. tfirneile Mttson Matther Gorson, Esq. - John Batl•y Ray .Fernald I~rb Zebuth Susan Coughanour . Char 1 h Knight Thoe~as Thanson ' - Qeorg• Fires+on~ f, . `~ ~ - ~ ~•~~ ~~~ ,., i ,{ '.1 _.i 1 - . .~, ram ~ .~. . TABLE f1F COkTENTS ' . . • Pa$ -` ll5t OF FIGURES ~ ....................................................... ~; LIST OF TABLES ........................................................ ii ~. LIST OF E)0•IIBITS ....:................................................. iii INTRCOUCTION .......................................................... PART I. •PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................ } A. APPLICANT INFttRiMAT10N .................................. » ~' i @. PROJECT INFORMATION .................................... » PART I1 . PROJECT IMPACTS AND ISSUES ................................. '' '_ A. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES ...................... ~! i c 8. ECOtrOMY ................................................ ?s : ' . C. PUBLIC FACIlIT1ES ...................................... 2~ 0. TRANSPORTATION ......................................... is :. ~. PART II 1. COMMENTS FRAM QTHER AGENCIES ............................... 5' PART IV. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................ 'a "s ' .~ ~~ ~ . ~~ ~P ~ ~: T Ie T~i~ Pte! , t Previous Development Plana .............«................. 6 2 Proposed Development anc Phasing ......................... 9 3 Environmental Issues ..................................... ~~ •. d COnstruCtton Costs ....................................... 15 -, - s Permanent En+ploymtr+t Impacts (Alternate 1) ............... ~? ~, ~~~ 6 Permanent Emp l oye+ent Impacts (A I •ternate 2) ............... t E « . Y 7 Permanent En+p I oyrnent by Sew'tor (A 1 ternate 1) ............. ; 9 e Permanent imployment by Sector (Alternate 2) ............. 73 _~s 9 Fiscal Impact (Alternate 1) .............................. 2, ~; ~` ..~: 10 Fiscal Impact (Alternate 2) .............................. ' ZZ "'' . 11 Mater, wastewater. anc Solid Haste ....................... _ 2'" _~ :' ' ;'r 12 Existing Traffic Conditions .............................. 27 .: ~' 13 Progran+noeo Transportation Improvements ................... 30 `' it Major Committed Developments ............................. 3s iS Trlp Generrtion Rates .................................... 32. f ;~: 16 C+~uletivs Transportation Impacts ........................ 33 ~., 17 Ctmnulative 1994 Peak WOUr Traffic ~ AM ................... 34 ,_ 18 Cumulative 1994 Peak li~ur Traffic e PM ................... 33 - 19 • Mod i t i cat ions to th® Do~+tor++ Oi str i butor 8i furcatea Romps -Dupont Plaza Task F®rce .......................... 3' 20 194d Levels of Service wit!1 Project Traffic and improvements ............................................. 37 21 Additional Impravernentg to t!~e povnto~n Distributor ®ifureateo Rasp System ................................... dp Z? Critical Intersections Without Bifurcated Ramp System .... :'; i l ~,~~ ~ F,..,~ m,~ ... - ~ ', ' , ~ ., _ ' ~' - .r: rr .... ' ~ • .. LIST OF EkH181T~ Exhibit P1C. T~ ~; P~~ 1 COOe for Wast• Types Coa+~non 1 y Assoc i atea w t 4h Eseh SIC In®ustry ..... ............................~...... 93 ` 2 Ltst of Potential I~aaroous Waste Generators Oy . SIC Coae ............................................... y~ 3 Reeomn+ended Plant Spocies .............................. 59 ~` Proposed Interim Transportation I~nproven+tnts ........... .v. ''"_ 3 Master pevelopment Plan ................................ t~6 E An~usl Status Report ................................... _1~7 ,. y.. ~ Y .__ ,. .. .. C~a ... ~ , 1_ _. ~n ~ y> ~ ' . . .. .,-, - .. • "t' _ ,.. .~ .~ .'. .. 1, .'...i ., _., ' iii ~"' ~ ~~~ .~y "~ . - ~ , «~; App I icat i on for Deve I opn+ont Approval , I ocatod on a parts I of I and t n the Dupont PIaZa area known as ®all Point, and reCOmn+enaed projeet approval, ' subject to 10 conditipns, t0 th• City of Niami. At th@ time Of action on Miami Canter i, the Applieant, H®lywell Corppratiort, vas also planning to develop t;~e remaining tour blocks of Dupont Plaza. A primary coneorn expressed by GOuncil members vas t:~at these remaining tour blocks be vaster plannex ano developed rich an integrated, campatiblo assign ana ~nfx of uses to create a duality urban envirorMnent in the core of aow+tovn Miami. Further. sine public agency planning for a final transportation systen+ to wpport the full builaout of Dupont Piazs was in the process at tti• time of the revieM of Mian+i linter I, the Council only requirow tnet tno Applicant develop an intortm traffic operations plan and imptomont taoss roadrrey improvements rshich vould both .support projeet traffic ana be cpmmpatiblo vith vhatover ultimate transportation solution might finally be odoptod for the entire area. On gay 2t, 1979, tha Ctty issued a Development Order, incorporating 17 Conditions ineluding the reduiremer+t for interim traftic Improvements prior to issuance of building permits. approving Niami teenter I. tiDlyMe11 Corporation later secured Options on ttiree o.f the four remaining blocks in Oup~nt Plaza. On July 11, 191610, Southeast sank. owner of tie northeesterrt block, sut~mitted art ADA t® the C~unGil to Construct s nov ~, Southeast Financial Censor on the tourth block. On July 1~, i9>~0, ~`~.~~~ - „~ ,, ;. ..~.. . ~ 4 MOlywell Corporation submittea an ADA to construct Miami linter iI on tn• other three blocks. eoth ADAs were subseQuently approved by the Connell and the City. Council staff strongly urged the Dupont Plata area ORI dwelopers to cooperate in jointly developing a tinal transportation Trt+provemont plan which wou~dt) provide acceptable I well of service in Qupont Plaza at tint buillout,_ano 2) be compatible with public plans for the I-9S : : bifurcated ramp extension and the Downtown People Mover system in Dupont _ }; Ptazs. The Applicants agreed to cooperate with each other and with a task force of City, County. and State staff to dweiop an ultimate roadwry and transit systea~ to support the three awelopments. As work began on the Oevetopment of a tinal transportation solution for -- furl buildout of pupont Plazas Mplywell Corporation wes reedy to obtain its building permits for the now existing portion of Miami linter I. It seemed prudent and certainly cost-effective to wait to determine what ': interim improvements should be required for Miami Center I until the tinal transportation• elution was dweloped. T?~eretore, on Septea~ber 2S, 19a0, the City of Mia~+i Com~+ission approved an ansendment to the Fiiami ~t,~ linter I T?evelopment C'rdor, which postponed the requirement for interim improvements ~ trawl prior to bui (ding perm its to prior to issuing ;~~ grtiticates of occupancy. Since T9AO, the Southeast Bank Financial Center has been constructe4 in i'upon# P I aza : however , the MI am T Center I I project wa9~ nwer started ano its Development Order expired in TSiBS. 8ee»use the now-expired Miami ,~ , ~/ i ,- tip: ~.i' __ s ~.Y'_. _~- .~_ . ,~ ~: ~,~ ' ~ • ~, . - ~. ,,. t -~- ... ~'.. F. _ ~ -. t.:, .. .. +; - l ~ -.. ~. ~ ~ .. ~ - i - ~ .. ~:.~, - - )1. Center II Oeveloptnent Order retlected~the impacts and Applicant 'fair share' for regionni roadway impr®vements for both Miami linter I and II, and the impaCtS Ot Mi aiF+ i (ienteP I have Changed Oue t0 Bub Stan• i a I mopitications to the projaCt, this assess~++ent reevaluates the Impacts of the Miami Center I. This assessment of the Mtemi linter I Levelopment has been prepared by ;. , the SOUth Florida Regional Punning Council. as reduirsd by the Florian ~~:~- Environmental land an0 Water Msnsgement Act for all Developments of Regional Inipaet. ,:. The assessment is based.on intorn~ation supplied by the Applicant, Miami and 0ad• County staff. vtticial plans. consultants. and tield inspection. -, Additlonai research relative to specific issues was conducted by Council staff vher• needed. - In aceorCance ~tth the Act, this assessment provides an overview of the _ posftive and negrtive impacts ifkely to result trom the propos~t. T'~e recdnmendations are intended to assist the City Cdna9+is$ion in reaching a decision On the proposed Bevel©pmen+ through consideration of regional, in addition to local, impacts aid issues. Copies of any "developmattt ®rder" taa~ order granting, denying. or grouting witty eondittons an application for a pevelopment permttl issued wit9 regard to t!1is project must be transmittacl 44 the South Florida Regional PI ann tag CaUP4G i f and t'we ~'lor ida impartment ®f C~xnmun ity Attatrs. 3 ~;. 3, .. __ '~ ~ ! ~1 ~~ ~ `/ 1i= !t1 # ~ ~ ~ . {'~ l Far ~ i- +' ,,°' i ~ J + .- ~.., A - ~~w~ ',Y ~~ it ~.r t .# r .....~... i ~ ' i ' .. ~ './'~ t i .~ ~-...~ _ '~`~ iY al a TT c > ~ ~~ ' W ~ $ ' ~ ~ ~ t ~ _ ' M w i ~~ g \ i . i 2: s~: ~ ~ ji- =L* _~ sF~ f • ~ ~+ !a{ sa ~~~ iti ~ ~ t { f#~ j ~~i a~~ . y~ [[ ~ i ~- ._ ~' t the Biscayne Plaza protect Mi11 consist of phrsa 1: a =4-story erst towr atop a 10-story ground podium Mlth parking. oftice. and retti~ - usts. anq P!lase 2: a S1-floor nest tower which will be built upon t'1e podium G®nstrueted in Phase 1 (Table 2). Th! Applicant is ' proposing 60 exlCUtiv@ epartmenta•(t20.C,00 square teat). 160.000 square twat of retail/COmmereial space. 700.000 square feet of oftice space. anq 1.200 parking Spaces. The comml~rcirl space FncluOes a small (10,000 square toot) restaurant/cabaret in t;~e garden park Ort the 1 f th (top) f It7or Of the pod i urn. The park +. i I I fnelude an ertiticial skating rink/dance floor. Phase 2 Milt incluas 90 executive apartment units (1130.000 square teat); 60.000 ~` squsre feet of retail space, and 780,000 square feet of oftice space. if mrrket conditions are not favorable for t:~e 1~0 dMelling units proposed in uses t and 2, the 300,000 square feet Mill be converted to ottice space. • r11010~t0 flrELOIrEwT AIQ IM1lslla b~~lpe Off~e-61e1 ~~~a-. ~ p~ . t ~•,1 OI t t~.l ROS1~e~M~~~ 1 ~t. •~•r W ell l CM~M T~1.000 61a Uf l • f ~ • Iq7 0 IMO 1 M~ 41p1.16 6M.000 i.R. e1 fffw~e -1 sia 100.000 0 160.000 60 tMr 1 •, t *f t wR ~11eu t 120, 00o S. f . IIIK1. f0ifl~el it fta•rwe rrese 160.Ot+o 0 60,000 tb ~w 1 r, 1 M0 1 N1 recce t • it ny wre• If wih.oreele •er earretr~flea of .toe 1'b~ •esloe«•1f1 ,•el~f. Nfe AwII~yH •:rI e1f>•f+ruC+ •ey 700.000 fewrP taus n OHICe face. 71ON1Ct : AQA ;. 9 _: ~ ~ '~` ~~ ,"! ....._ _ a ~ ~ -~-- ~. ~.:.. -`~' A NFl~irbor Proinensde" along the southern bounaary of the site faajacent to the 9ey/River) Mi ll ~ constructed +o provide a '; peoestrtan connection from the E38ysise project through 8ayfront ~~ Park. to Miar-i linter. Ground ~~, floor retail/commercial space •tlt be - ,;. locates ad jecent to the Pron+en ase. :~:~~ ~ ._ 4 . t S ~ ~, 2 - . ~ r , - ~ . ~ .. - - . - k .. Y ..l ~_ :Y._' . f J ~. _ _. ~ ..,~ •, n ~..: 1 ~yw .,.. ~~ ? .. r f .. 1.~ LY •I ~ 1.. ~ J O ~ - ~ ~ '; . _ ~'~~ ~YJ _ •~ Y `'~ _4 ~~ A. ENVIRONMENT ANO NATURAL RESOURCES t . Su_ar o Table 3 summarizes the impacts of th• project on the ~` .envirornnent. Several issues ar• oescribea betoM to n+ore a ~: . detail. - _,~ V: _ 2. A t r s .~ Appitcant estimates of one- and eight-hour carbon monoxia• NCO) :. f concentrations wre made using canpvter modeling. T!~e highest predicted eight-hour CO concentration of 7.4 X82 percent of :, ' State Standard) occurs in 1991. if project traffic is .4 subtracted frpn the analysis. th• predicted •igttt-hour 1991 . o~ncentration drops to 3.7 ppm (ti percent of State stancaro). Dade County maintains a permanent CC monitoring site at tOt - ~. East Ftagter Streets ahiCh hos recorded many exceeoancfs Of CO standards over the i ast few y®ars. Cont i nuaG exceeaantes cou t a result i n the des i gnat ion of the Sota~''+ Florida a i r shed as 0 non-attainment area for CO by the U. S. Envir®nmentai Protection Agency. South Fit~riae is atrea~iy a non-8ttainn+ent arcs far Ozone. aitl~ugh tev excesoances of ozone stanoaras have been recorde0 since 1982. ~~ . R . ,,. - ;. . .. .,. , M' .~~_ ~: ~ .4 .. `~ -. i hi _ ~ • ~ , .. .. ~ _ .ti, , '. .. - . TABLE 3 ' ENVtRONMENT'AL I SSI~S • i g__ C~E_MT . • ~ Atr Qual tty Set 2. • Land and Soils The project stte +ras creetsd by extensive ttlltn9 of Biscayne Bay in tge beginning of this century. Maps dating as tar beck as ia99 sROar that the historic ShOP•Iine Ot 8tsceyne Bay toliorred tqe present ; iorat t on of 01 sceyna Sou i w aro. Sane _ T - addtttonsl ttlltng nay ee necessary to bring the site to redo i red t l o0o elevations . Exposed areas shoo I d be spr ayeo . n+u I c:+ea Or grassed. as necessary, to present soi 1 • erosion. -~ Flood i~one Arias ,, The site is located in a 1t}C-year Hood _ . arts and the minta+un tiro floor elevation.... ` spselfii0 Dy the Federal Insurance Adenlhlstratton fs *1d.A NGYO. Ikeordtng f0 the Apps (cant. the ground . floor, retail. office. and parking uses S- - •i11 be built st a n~ini+nurn Nwstton of *S feat nGvO. •hich meets Oade County but not _ • federal Hood criteria. ~cupants of the ground floor •iII not be ellgible for federal flood insurance. Rli ot~er areas of the project ri i I be above ais tNt trt;v0. ' and theretore rill bs eligible tvr tederal Hood insurance. _ Mater. Orainpe. and Sep 3. Masardous Matsrials . Met 1 end s. Yogptat t on, That f 1 to does eat contain any wt i and s. Or and Mildltta stgnlfieant vegetation. an0 is of Itttie value,to mtlditfe. I?niy tt~pse slMt spieits listed to F.~chibit 3 should be used in future project oandscaping. Mtstoricel and Archaeological According to tho Dade aunty wtstortc Sites Survey. stgnifteent archaeological features and/or artifactual data may bt deposited ben+ratw till along the ratstern boundary of the alts. Ott Cade County archaeologist should bs notified of the-cor+structlon schedule and at IoNd access to the site - for Horn i tr~r l ng, an0 an arCha~ tbg i st shgu 1 C be on site during project earth ~rork. 1f .any areha~~ogical tlnds are made, COns~rruC~ lion eh6uld 0e delayed in that por't'°ion of the site anti( cyftieists Cbtn take aCttons t0 survey end/r~r excsva~e the sr1• i firs. ~'~ ~ '~ ~.~~ St~Rt: I~C~ , SAP;; ' " -_~; :~: _ _ I ~ ' . j+ )' _ ~. _ ~} _. _ ~,. „~tr 'A' . i,_ }. ~~ •~: F`. is _j., i,: (~ s~ . ~• . i is r !: Alt!lough the CO eoneentretions edjaeent to the Muni Center I project (in eeytront Park) are not projected to exceed staneares, project trattie alone contributes ~.7 ppm (41 percent of State stancare) to the sight hour C@ concentration. T!'+e Applicant shoulC incorporate the transportation and air `. 4` Quality impact reduction strategies listed in Condltlon 1 into project design and/or operation. } t 3. c- ater . Or s i ntae•. and Na zerdous !~atsr i a I s - Soil borings done by the Applicant in 1979 shoMea teat i groundwater beneath the site is approximately S feet below ,: existing grade. Ground~oater beneatti t;~e site is saline and should not be used for human consumption or irrigation. There ~4 ;~ - ~ are no surtrce rater bodies on-site. Biscayne Bay. a State , ~ r: ., ,~. Aquatic Preserve and Outstanaing Florida water. is located V t: '' in~a+eQ i ~+te I y east of the project s t te. According to ttis Applicant. the arainage system for the ex i s• i ng portion of Mi en+ i Gntsr directs storn+water to a perimeter extiltration system trench. RunOtf that exCeeaS fhe - Capacity Ot the trench system t1owS fnt0 CetentiAn tanks 8nC then to drainage wells. which eiscnarge runoff to the saline aquifer. The system is capable of '~endling the 2S-year storm. , Ttie propose4 Hiami Center arainage system will be designr0 *O hrnole a 23-year storm in tht~ same manner described t~3ove. .. Qnly runoft in excess of the 2S-year design storm will leeve the atte. .. . ~The~Applicant has proposes to maintain the parking garage 5y washing Dorn the paves surfaces ana then routing the rasndorn water, rhtch contain a greeter amount of, ana more highly conCentreted• pollutants than runoff from Other On-site • impervious surfaces, throug:~ oil ana grease interceptors into a sanitary serer. This ra:haorn progran+ Mill not allor aischarge of polluted rashaorn rater to th• E~iscayns Aduifer. During construction of the remainder of Miami Center I, tie llppiicent should place rip-rap. Temporary beans. or ot~er barriers along th• perimeter of the site to prevent discharge of Construction-relates runotf to the Bay. T!~e aesisn and construction of the project shoula also inctuae permrnent 5ern+s or Oerrters. et least one foot above grade, so that aired discharge to the Bay does not occur after the project is canplete. Another source of water pollution. potentially even more harmful than storm eater runott, is hezaraous caste. Nat3rdous caste is aetined by the U. S. Environmental protection Agency and th• State es waste that is ignitable. corrosive, reactive. or toxic . Exhibit 1. inclu0ti0 at-the end of this ORI Assessment, is a Iist of ~tandero Industrial Classification (SIC) codes far faC i I it ies t"tat 'teve been touna tc~ prov ioe one or more Ot t:~e haterdous castes listed in Exwibit 2. these Iists are excerpted try tie ~'loric~e Yrc,ter t~ual ity Assurance fi~Ct . p.:; _ - 1.. ~y regulftionse ano all tacilities that fall rithin these SIC cones are required by the Ac+ to prow ide• tntormat ion regara ing types. ano anounts• of raStes generated at the taciltty rho now this caste is being managed. It is likely that potential smrll quantity hazardous waste generators aill be oeeupants of Miami Center I. The Applicant '+as proposed to cover load ing avers to excl uoe reinrater. Implementation of the aoaittonal Dnetsures I isteo to Condition 3 rill further reduce the possibility of adverse impact on ,a ; ,.;r ;'s. regional eater quality. ~f: 4' "r T 3. ECQt~M1r t 1. Project Costs ~. r ~i^rA Table ~ summarizRS project costs. inc ud.tng.,construction ~tf -_ _t emp 1 oy~+ent ano rages . a; TNIL ~ / COISTN{~110M CCSTD 1^ t~0001e - w~el Oleeev~o ~lw 014eer~e rls>te 1 Iw d~ 1.r.. GMN..o~ «e® ~~~ t~ e= i01~ _ spy 10.40t' )1.000 ~ N•!n0 100. ,.. ~eUer ~2.Ot+0 9a.D60 50.440 ~101.D00 40 ~N I el a 67.00l~ 90. D30 s`. SDO 100.200 77 IMpft11 14 e>.er erleoi Me~• re•O~el Me. kw9a~ Ae11~IpMr .o.y'~ 4~tiM 1.700 ~ 1.00 ~ ~Afr }OT~~ w 1=0.400 110.900 70.000 S i D, 200 • TNe1 ~'-ejiC• C+6P • t51D.2 •i i l ion•• CO~Hry~•IOM Er~ilolra~• 9~8 YnelaiYeOe orr wer Iar 4 Nere • 1/,41t ewt~OV~a 7eMf1 Lenr•ue•low eop•rs 10'.6 .~n 1 lew tt22.16+ oe- .or~ovea wN +w nl/nl CrvoN faii+~~. i2:.21t per ew-lave• veer -Ot Plecrwdm `~eae, w,r~e 1, aa4e f2:.2I9 oe~ ~a1psM }eW -ir OI Kew~e •I eSe. ~"•eN I 1 1 . • 14Ka eellire. N t.tleel~q laryre1y te11~i. tOV~Ct : K+~ ~ 5 Ir,~~ ,., ... ,- ~~; y .,~.., 2. '.~n~o Total permanent project employr+ent is estimated to be 12.14a for Alternate t, which ineiuo~s 1S0 resiaentiai units (300,000 square feet), ana t3, 337 for Alternate 2, whim includes • 300,000 additional square ¢eet of otttce space ana residential units. Because a majority of firms locating in new otfices trove frort+ other otfice buildings in the Rag ion. only about ZS -~ percent of the jobs can bt considered new to the Region. For - ~ j ]tt: Alternate 1, assuming 2,497 new project employees, the Council ~_ s~ ,.: estitnstes that new project etnptoyment. by its indirect and - Y' ,~. induced etfects, could generate up to 5,442 new jobs in the ~ }'~ ~r .1 ;~ - Region, with 1,637, 3.716. and 69 in 8rorad. Oaoe. and Monroe. .'-.. '. A respectively. This employment corresponds to X108.5 million ft+ ~t. ~~~ ~; total wags end St84.t million in vet w added to the regional i •; ~ economy ~ Tab 1 e S) . ~f ~, .~ •,~ ~ .! ' ~~ _ ~ Alternate 2, assuming 2,782 new project employees, could. ! generate up to 6,100 ner jobs to the Region, wttl 1,867, 4,165, ;~ -and 78 in Broward, Oaae, aid Monroe. respectively. This ,., :~ `i eeiploya+ent corresponds to 5121.3 mi I 1 ion trt total wages and (207.6 million in value added to the rag tonal eCOnany L?able ~~ :; a~. . ~{ Table 7 stars the sectortf t d i str ibut ton of permanent ~. rnp l oyment ~' ~ s'. . for A l ferrate 1 Ot1d Table 6 shows the distribution for . _ ~{ ~, ' Alternate 2. ~ j d~~ 9 ! ~ ,, ,, ~: __ ,V i .: TAKL ! IRIrMntNT EM'L01'wL-~ ItrRACTS tALTEttt'M'. ) A. !tM'L~fMIMT • . ~. RLA. • RAM ~ ~ . titOtrMO OAOE t+lt>w10t a610a ttUCa ~AtatIClTtAE. ~OAtf~r. Rltiala0~ 0.~• 0.~ 0.~ 8.~ 0.~ AQIU;LtLTIllA6 $illvifX3 3. 7. 1. 10. a. • r~atat: t. t. 0. 2.' 0. . t:Atf7++I~TIOM 7a. Iti. 3. 196. al. 111-Nt~ ~'71A ~ -Ki 73. 1 !tl . 1. 26 t . i2. 1RA11s'ORTAT i tarp Ate IR I ~ I T t es a7. 227. _. 27a. 21. wac:!-~E TdlA~ se. 1 t 3. • 1. 1•=. t a. ETA i ~ 11fA0j 300. a77. t t. 79A . t 7t. ttMAKt. taf. AM RtAt. ESTATE aT7. 9A0. +2. la`!. 22l. sflvtOts Nt. Itl~. 3t. 2297. 3a3. ~KatwEt~ 0. 0. o. o. o. 7pTA6 177. l71~. N. faa2. tx7. ti. TOTAL rAtit3 tt000 f) , . A011CLLTM[. ItltESTR1, Ilialilt; 19. . ~!. 0. M. 19Z. Aot ICIiTIJtAI govt us •i. 7O. 17. i 3i. bo. rta~Mti 10. 23. 2. 3a. tti. ,, ,t t:as*++treTtaa 172•. sa69. 9s. arn. 972. , . wNKACTtJtraG 127?. A09t. 20. 6lM. ti7fi. --z 1RAMSt~OaTAT10M AtO iRt~tTtti tl31. 6732. f?. 7ta7. tMt. IMItSA~t TttAOt tits. 2a37. 39. )090. 1i7. _~: • tSTAI~ reAEx 3a7t~. 60i7. ~lN. i7fi3. t;a9. -:` R.IIIAtit. Ilf~. A10 RtAL ~iTATj 9932. 22S7A. 3a2. 32Mti. 7213. '+ lftvrCES 13~'1a. 30ti7t. 910. a72t6. 7a72. oovt~•~E1+T s7, to.c. 2s. 1629. 572. 110TA~ , 32330. 7aatl. 1779. tOtiS29. 17ti7a. t:. Must aF tur.ur clooo s ) Nett;~TU![. -t~teSTAr. ttSata6 92. 307. 0. 3N. 9t O. Aartai,tt/U~ iE9twtaS 13t. 220. s9. 399. ts7. rtNttwi St. h. •. 12~. M. CttMST1lIJCTt Otf lit 2. t t 1 !!. a29. 19379. a01. oltu+lt-AcTtlt~ac 79+0. 27701, t2s. 33cts. slt0. 10A11S~OnTATlOa Atp (Rtt,ITItS a0~2. 17ati7, tag. 2179`. 1930. wats.~t TttACE 1277. ata. to. i!2s. >,t. t=TA t` TttAt3f 79+3. t t 7~7. 9ii. 2009,. a003. /IMANCt, I/t7j. At0 ~At. ESTATg 1lat9. 91ii7t. 1197. 14!7!2. 23091. ttiwtt3Fi 2'-la7. `2'7"09. IthO: 91!00. tlta7. fD1RRtaA~MT `19. taa0. 30. I090. 3.l. 7RA~ 100'!0!. 2l+32E. tti~l. 339912. 7ii12. - 0. Mutt AODt D t t Ot50 S) _ - • . A01tt:LLTtJ1E. +~dtE~-. tiEa~kG . asi. 173. . 0. tom. a73. AQttt;tLl'~+Ab S~+wt:ES 7g. t2b. 29. 229. t!. r1alNfj 23. 7?. a. 79. at. casTMUC•r l 0w t 9t t . 2727. t 07. a 7a2. t 077. wwrAcTUlt~~ 299i. 96+3. a7. t2ilbf. 2070. 7tUMS~iTATIGa Ata) t11'IIITIE4 2717. 119y7. 171. ta977. t3a2. tt»atsAr~ TAaoo; l73. 3sM. 7s. a2iw. 710. tItTA,~ 114AOE act7~. s~oc. 2c+. t02ar. 20at. tIMA~'. laj. Ate It~A~ E31`a~ ?tlW7. `9313. T17. 7t7y7. 117a0. =Itvt~S ttil2?. a316t. tt'~5. 63276. tOs2ti. t~'~E+t*T •97. 11 ~0. ~7• t 7t!!. 2fi. f~Tat, 7!700. 127fat7. 2'1'N. lierls9. 2ttlS;+ • +~fi r~ ~iNY wrt~ 1d4i) ffilf i0 rt~Yntl)~. ~~ _, .::. ,. _ ._ _ .~....... _.~ ~ .. .. .y.. _r~~~ ._. _ ..~ sss~ _ ____ f __ ~.` TAB b ' tM~lOYMtifT 11MdClS tAt,TtIM1ATt 21 A. t~l.t~t-+T • . . S0. r~A. ~ALr - ~IOuA*O OAOt MOrlttt RtQ10M /tACa , . AatlcitTt,At. eattS~t, rIsFIINt; 0. 0. . 0. . 0. . 0. Aa>,IcutrulA~ stllvtas •. b. 1, tt. ., rIN11dQ 1. 1. O. 2. O. t:O+S~tJCTIOtu i1. 13~. 1. 221. N. 1MtdJ~ +CTM t Na it . 207. t . 210. b~. 10AU5~0ttTATiQ1 At® tJTILITits 50. 252. 2. 30r. 21. M~R+LtSAI.t TAAOt 32. 130. t. 1W. tb. _ ETA 1~ TIUOt 132. !2!. 20. 071. t 75. -IMAiCt• III. A1r8 QA6 t:TATS l3i. 1110. 13. 1661, 253. !'Itvtt;tf 731. t7N. 33. 2lbi. air. _ TOTAL lil7. Ilbl. 7i. i10D. f7t. -. , •~ ~, •. TQTAI 1tAQ3 t t 000 f I ~s ~Y-^ . . Awtaa?I,~t. ra~itsM~, r1sMIMt . a. • 7z.. • o. • i.. • r!. e t..• ~'~`} A01tCLLTW-l Si~-v1t3t !1. i!. ti. 1!!. !i. easT111sTtaN tom. 273.. la. .e5s. tlo.. ~~ M/VtAt:7t~INr! ~ u+7. 11112. 2Z. l~t1. w. tlulsaO~TATta1 AtO tRIL1TItS 1.7!. ixl. ft. 7>h1. 712. ; k' waltsA~t Tluot 7a. rns. •!. 3lri. .20. , ~: . ~tTA lr, 7RAQ 3ido. lbo:. r•. ~'f17, l Of 5. rtwl~t. 1115. bo tsAt. tsTATI lua. 255.x. 3h. sr77. !l7~. ; Ss~-las l.++s. 31!tM. lots. lo•oi. 1301. 00 50~. 1 t n. ti. 1710. :M . . TtRA~ 31121 t. i3311. 1A0. (21515. 111/!5. `s • ~. Mint ar oVrrvr clooo s~ AaICL16TUt. rtIKSTIIt!, e15+1tNo 102. 3d3. 0. ads. 1011. AaICtS,TMAt. SDtwctS /ai. 2N. !!. adz. it~2. ' •INltla 12. ~/. 7. 111. 7!, - ~ = COK~ti'Tt On iiii. 12b~. Iil. 22Od1. SOOT. ~ tMMMAC'TtltnoO 1112. Tfi2®. 131. 31711. 51ld. ,, tRAMSrd4TAT 1010 ~eO IR t I, I T I t5 152?. i Mb1. 271. 21263. 2177. '4 w0LtfAtl7~IIQ tars. 5721. t@. '(251. y1. - RTA11. tiAQ fl41. 12123. b2i. 222d2. 11211. r Imo. 11H. Aran ~A` tsTATt •wao. e t 3200. /7t 5. tb*'29 . 2irt10. lIIYtGES 3O1i7. t~i091. ID02. 102dl6. ibii~. r ~' t~H. 1616. 31. 2?15. 3M.. ~A6 • I l xoa. ~a01 t1. 9d9MJ. 313 t t 6. i31M. . ~~.. ' 0. vr-Wt AA5E0 t 1000 ! 1 ~~~ t., . _ - ~ AMIdt7lilt. ~~STw'. r15MI11Q~ l1.~ 190,E O.~ • 221. • 501. i.. AaIt;WTt,RAt. viC.l'S M. t11. 9t. 256. f3. f' MfN111Q Ii. 5!. 1. N. Ib. COMifNtt~'IOw- 2171. 31116. 120. 1101. t22T. ~~' ? ~ ~ ~ 3211. iN91. 51. 13761. 2211. I Ow Ijt'ILit'ItS ~TA 3102. 13356. t'O. 16117. t/M. wot.tsALt ~1Atrt tit. 31tbr. bv. Ib3i. lib. 1r7AIL TSAR 1176. 1526. 320. t/323. 2255. rlw-rwx. 11rs. ~ VIAL tS1°A~ 2rybt. '~E7a1. 160. ~37t. 13273. ti~ V f~ lt~s 20113. I~f ! e. t.f 1. t y. t Ib . 5 2 }.:: a~ •r ~~iR l3~r 1321. Ii. ay ~,~ 1awiF. ~~ rry. ~~ ~,r~. 70t1-L 64i~t . 1139ty$. 3617. 20763,-. 33665. • . ~` M~~r s wrN6~r ~ ~~ sl ~ r 11~ ~ -+ ~ e i. . , Op . i z 91~wrs ~ s~ ^ A ^ ~ ~ ~ _. ~ ,,,.., _. 1 e ~ r w e) i ~'~ .. iK r.l ~ +) ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~! = M A K ) ~ M1 • IP ~ ~ ~~ t ~ _ ~~~ ~3 ~' : ~ s ~ • ~ ~ ~~ t( • ; h 3 yig~S ~ h h~ { i ~ w ~ 14i h i r ' Q ~ ~ Y ~ _ a • r. y~ w ~ i ,_ .. ._ ~ ~r'~ e .. ~ •' ~ ~. {y Y1 ~ e~j11 e~ ~~ R ~„ ~ ~ M ` ~ ~I = ~~ • ~ h ~ v _k ~ r ~ ~ } ~ ~~~iii ~ i ~ I r ~ ~7 _ ~ h = c „ . F O) ?~ i _ p ~ W L « ~ - ~ . ~ ; ~ + I ~~ w ~ .. .. ~ _. ~yy i ~ ~ W • ~ ~~~ .: ~ ~~~ R.,,..d.,~...n._ `_ , - ,.. i :: {:; F,,, #` } _ . . - _, , ~: ;;; ~ _ 3. ~ Fi scsl impact Us t ng 19a3a mi I I age rates and h i stor i s average expenditures. ~• Alternates t and 2 roula have a positive fiscal Impact of S3.2 mill ion On t!le City of Miami, 52.3 mil 1 ion for Dade County, 1~'. .52.d million for the sehopl district, ane 50.2 million for ttie Water Management District and special districts combined, for a positive regional impact of 58.1 million (Tables 9 and 10). l t,. ;,,: -_ C. PUBLIC FACiliT1E5 ~' 4`` 1. Wa•er. Masterater, and Sot id Mbst• ~ ~_ F.' ~ Tab 1 e 1 t sualmar i saa t!~e project's Impact on rater. vssterster, ''' . , and sol id caste. TAiL,Q 11 ~' 1' ,,.:. ,. . - rATEl1, rAStEMATER. AtO 5010 MASTS - - `., Avliliel! C!ClCi~Y . _ ~u01 ie R!Q i i itr AvNNf OwleO h~1Mo !e0 SOtlrel MIffN' 111•COD tS0 1.037.000 G/'0 Yr! rASA NytrNtrr At?.000 Oro 1.0!7.000 OrD Y•!! • rASA sol Id rMt!• t2 TI+O 9r Y!! •'rivif! ts9 Cuete Yaros ` p!r a!Y ~,, ~ QN loss p!r oly. ~.'` t,, , T*0 • foe! p®r ow • T01l1 Ow.anet ._ i ~~ .. _ . i y I Z4 '~ t1..+1 ~~~ ,. . F .~ ~-~- .. ..: . :. ° . , ;. _ • N ~ .D a ~ C ,. ' P, r •s . . f ~ ~ • C - • M • •~ .`:. ~ • = ' ~ G : _ ~ w ~. ~ j p:. O r ~ o 0 0 ~ ~ • ~ t:, ;. v J ~ 0. •~ ~ - • ~ ° w a ~ . ~ : _ _ , ~~ ~ ~ O d ~ r Uf h h = ~ `. . O . :fi ~ • • • ~ - ~ e : _ ~ ~ ~ Q A. ~ K _ `I _ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D g O 8 O . n n : • e• • • • ~ . _. i : ~. V r i t _ ~ _ , - _ w ~ ~ h. • A ~. W . ~ ~, O. O ~., i =~~~ h O W ate ~ ~ r. • ~ . ~ W ~ Z ~ s.s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z 7 ~ ~ © {y y~ r R ~ N ~ ~' ~ a Uf Y. (A •• C yr Y W ~ ~ .. ~ ~ 0 r Q r ~ O 4 ~ {y 1 ~ AC ~ ~ .~ {y~ a M y~ U y~y~ G ~ ~ ~ S V 1 = = r ~ ~ ~dl~~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ M d{ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F q ~ ~ s p za ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~, .~ t, ~„ 3 1 t ' F.: • :, .. ~ ~ 2. Polies end Fire Pot ice serviee~is provided to the dovelopnent arse from the City of Miami P®i tee tepartment on NMI 2nd Avenw. Avirage polies emergency response time in is 3 to 3 mtnutes; average routine police reponse is 30 minutes. The applicant indicates the projaet rill include an on-site security system eombining ' personnel end electronic surveillance ena en+ergeney response '~ tnciuding uniforn+ed end plain etothes security guards. In :~=a ~; eddition,~ access to building rill be electronically controlled. '-, , , _} ;,x~ City of Miemt Fire Department rill provide lire service to tie r project trdn Sutton ~1i on NE Sth Streit, rith a response time ~~` • ~ . ~, , of under four minutes. The station is equiped rith tro engine ~€je 7 ' Ca~penies, one aerirl company, and one rescue ean~peny, and an °~ on•duty stett of 18 persons. City of Miami Fire Department is el sD avei I able for Mnerger+cy medical service. Randle t:estern Ambul a~+ce Sarv ice ri I t provide rnerg~ncy mad ical saw ice to Miami Center 1 as part of their contract ritti t1e City of Miami. Response times for dorntorn Miami CuPrentiy average 8 to 10 minutes. The City is presently developing an tn~pact fee ordinaee to be -' i~npossd at building permit tssurancs, caleuleted beset! upon Costs of necessary a5oditional factlites neede0 to support 23 ,..~ ~ ~.._...~....~._. _-~- _d_ - ~-~-- -- _.. __...~~.___--_.._. ~~~ ~ - _..~. __ _ _ ._ __ _ ~_. ~.a..~ , _~. proportionate to excess devolopment. The tire department has inCicated that this project may be subject to the fee. 3. Ener The Applicant proposes to use electricity as the primary fu~t source. supported by a diesel fuel operated emergency ~:: generator. The total energy consumption at project buftoout is t.- estimated to be 336.4 biltfon BTU's. or 9®.6 million kilo~att t j hours. This is equivalent to the energy content of 2:2 million k 9alions of fuel oil. Since this is electrical energy, three .;. tta~es this amount of energy (6.7 million gallons of tuel oil) ~. must be eonsumeo at the por-er plant to proviae this energy to ~ the sits. Because marginal costs are htgher than average costs ano the • ~ marginal costs for new tactiities are htgher than trte average costs of existing facilities. the cost of providing aoottionai electricity to regional users sill be stgnittcantly higher than 41e typical eosts todry. However. tht nev custom®rs that need -added g~reration capacity do not ply the true marginal costs tor•the added capacity. lnoeatd, the average cost t® alt consumers increases to cover the marginal cost of serving ne« - eustCmer s. . 24 . ~+ r,~~ .. ;. ~ _ . y.LL.. - ~~ • • ~;,'. r, ,.. ~' All electricity users in the Region subsidize th! Costs of new ~; `'" or expanaed electrical tacil ities and the marginal costs _ ~.; > , "` incurred by the utility due to nea consumers or tnereaseA use ~. ~ by existing eonsumers. Thus. it is in fhe interest of ail - ., . electricity users in the Rog ion to redueo the energy consumption and increase the energy ettiCiency of users in the Region as a aey to retard the tncrease in average energy costs. ~_ };. ;; ; ~~~ t?J1e aey this can be done is to require all nea construction. urge or mall, to meet adequate energy etttciency standards. T',e inclusion of the energy conservation messures lister in Condition 11 atll reduce the project's energy use and assist in avoiding adverse regional energy tmpect. p. TRANSPORTATION introduction in previously reviewd appl tcattons for dwetopnent approval in th! Oupont Ptaae area (Ball Point, Miami alorld Trace Center tGnTrust). Southeast Punk F t Went t al Cantor', and the nOa expi req Miami linter 11 ), transpor°ratton assumptions depondeo on a throe point system consisting ot: t) the poanta~ Poopie t~ver SysteHn, 2) ~+ tmprov00 ' street surface system. and 3) the Oowntoan Ctstributor 6ifureatea ~: • ramp system to access i-9S. As sas mentioned in these previous rev teas, the success of the doantoan transportation syst~n tas ae~I as ,the ui ttma+e v tab i I ity of any dwelops+ents in the Dupont PI aza 2S r ~' ,} - t - • ~ ~~ - r~l~ ifs ~ , area) aepenas on alt three points of the system being operational prior to full buildout of the area. Prior to July 1942, in the absence of an adopted fair share transportation poltey that covla effectively analyse and address an Applicant's impacts on these -_ improvements, Council reduested that developers in the Dupont Plaza area arrange "front-end" loans for the bifurcated ramp system to Order tp assist in timely development of needed infrastructure. As buildout of this area is fast approac~tng, it seems not only prudent but necessrry to mention these needed tacTisties again. - Tao parts of the three part system are presently on-line. Or are caning on-tine in the near future, those being a version of the poentoan People Mover System and major surface street improvements. The third lag of t;~is system, the OOrntoen Otstributor 81.fwrcated ~~;` Ramp syst~n, still remains i n the p l t~+n i ng stages. As has also been noted in previous Application for Qevetopn+ent Approval revises, the i'la01 Point development ass revieaso outing the long process to assess and plan for the future transportation system to the Dupont Plesa area. As a re$ult of this timing problem and in 'r an effort to assist in the timely developmatrt of the E3al t Point property, tt sas agre~ea that the transportation impacts generated by 8a11 Point could ba aaaressad in the Miami Canter II application. These impacts sere a~Odressed in the submitted Miaani Center II app l tcat ion aa+d also to tqe issues Miami Center I I Deveiopnent z6 ~'~~ er ~~ ,. ,, { - .~ :: :. . _, .. ~ _... . r.__ _--~----~-- _ __,_:.~ .~.. w :: .r . , Approximately $10S mi 1 I ion i n road May in+proven+ents are prograsmfi+ed ai th i n the tr tf f i C impact area. the most significant of these improvements include t) the tour OowntO~+n distributor improvements ~ 2) the 8r i eke I i (venue br iage over the Miami R i ver ~ and 3) the SW 2na ~-venue bridge over the Miami Rtver. Each needed improven+ent's deseriptton~ year of construction. cost. and rpplieant toir share is shoMn in Table 13. Background Traffic Pro~eC+ions Background traffic grorth throughout the impact area was protected at -2.4~, compounded annut+t l y. basso on t,e average decrease in traffic volumes to the area during tea past five years. Projections sere mace fur 199x. NO saottionat road segments Mouid operate beloM LOS "C" wit,. the eadition of 1994 background traffic. 3. Cpem fitted bevel ol~+ent Trat t i c ~~® . T+~enty-two cow fitted deuce opmpnts Mere tdent i f i ed i n the tratftc impact area. Tt+e names. location. use. ana sole of these developmer-ts era tist~ in Tabie td. The addition of cCmmttted development traffic t® the 1994 programmed network results in n0 additional road segment operating beloM lOS "C". :: .. 29 . !~'~ ~ ~ ~°'. -- --~---~.-----~-_.._..y.~__~___~. ~.._.__.. _._.._ .~_ n _. ,- , ;~ < -. 4~ ,, {. ~' .. ; _ . . ~ I ~ ~ o- w • ~ '~ ~O ~O ~O ~ o O h0~ ~ . ~ Y . r ~ • ~ s ~ - ,'' IrO WO !VO ~ NO o hO ( O ~.,~. r , n n M ~ 3w' S~S M p S Y~ S if p p N Y~ ~ ~ O ~ N '"i o . . ~ . ~ ~ e w M ~ ~i /~ ~ i-v ~ a "~ ~~, _ _ - t P ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` O o a ` o _s ~~ ~ e ~ d M ~ . _ ~ . .~ • $ . ; o ` ~ ~ ~ ~ x ~ s x ~ ~ o ~ ~ . a ~ ~ A , . - r - , - ~ p . ~ ~ s P - ~ 8 ~ • M O ~ ® ~ ` 1 p~ _i A _M O f R _~ A ~ ~ ~ + ~ i ~ s .wr W sQ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ P ~ Y ~ ~ ~ ~g ` ~ ~' ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ + Y1 ~ y`~ y it i~ t4 6 ~ d ~ fv~ M1 ~ ~ . _ • • elv offle. Tdwar e~-eka I ava i affle• tS0.000 SE Ittn Street erleka l ear Sovt~ Qertnora i O'fle. 316.000 Offle. Town SE 11tH Strpt ' erlGkelt Kay Cl wgMa+ Island Raslaenttal/ 700 OU/ ;: '!+ase 1 Of f l e. t A. 000 SrlCka 1 Ker ClaueMOn Island Realde>•tlal 331 OU 'n.N 11 erlekell Kor CtaugMOn Island Realaaa+tlal ~t0 OU haa}e 111 i 1221 erlCkatl ePlCkall Mrenw i O!fte./ a o.ooo/ , ~ 12tH Strpt Raall 10.000 OM erlekall erlekall Ave>+ue i Offtee/ Aa3.000/ Sowre SE Ott+ Street RaN t 12.000 T.e ertekell erlekall A,-anw i Offle./ u3.000/ ;t Town SE Ott+ Supt Mtat l 12.000 =t=. Lincoln To.ers erlekall Atrenw t Offlu/ 731.600/ ~s 3aF 7tR Strpt Ilaail 12.000 - f;:` _ ertelall Stalon S>M tat Avanw i Oftles/ 2!0.000/ *4 Tdwrs ~ etR StrNt Raai 1 te.000 Sev-wast Flnanctal elaeat~+e 81•a. i Offle./ 1.1!0.000/ ContK SE 2nd Street Retail 16.000 Rlvarpare Ilotal SE t Av.nw i Mdtal 129 Suttee is SS stn Strpt Uttrawont irll SE tat /wanua i Ihtl11 93.000 _ SE tat Strait IrtrO-0WO A.!' nln. PM 2nd A1-iaYO i Gowt. Otflea/ 600.00/ eYtIOIn9 aM 2no Shpt Beall aQ.00o Cent~ust Towr SE 1st M-anw i OfttGe/ 1s9.000/ St 2nd Supt 14ta11 26.X.+0 wsliw Tamar Mast Zfld M-onw i Offle./ 262.000/ midi F I .p Lr St . ~ t an 6.000 eeralde Specialty ®®ytrcmat M®rk i Spec. Ratall 23~,~00 GM.r /~ +MtR Supt Clty~iloMlnlatratiAn Fit 2nd avanua i Odvt. Offteo 3t6•a00 eYil0lnp II ~ 3rd Strait ilarlda Ragle~-al FII~ 2nd ~enua i 6ovt. Otftu t6l1.OOA Sere isa IianteP 1 1 PfM Stn Street Fra~.eae T69,ar WI a~ta >Si sCrrp 0Y ad. ~, MI sa0 tMs • Ft6 6tH Strati is SOIR!wgt' al~rt$vv1/ FWO ~d 16~eanua i ~erefal/ 2'0.000/ 'ark Mast Mtl Qth Strait Rrfld.ntial 1.670 011. ~.fe i COurtlrpu~e SOuare FIYI tit Awanw i Ott1e./ 23t~000/ pM 2Ka Street Reta11 17.000 ~: SOLACE c I1pR ,, ~; . • ~. -- s • mo0ified version of the progran+med Oprntorn Distributor Bifurcated Ramp system. This mpdified design is discussed in greater detail in Section 5, Additional Impr®vements deeded. Table 16 snore the c~i9tul at i vQ effects of 1994 background, e0~+itted Bevel®pment, and project tratfiC on the programmed and modified roa0 netrork, and Tab I es 17 and t@ shot the t~~ets of service on roadray segn+ents for each of these impeets. Tlle{~ 16 CuMILATIVE 11tA16'OIITATIQN IMIACTs Ow010~1~-+ I~0lCtf V isf teq wt~grk 1991 •ee~srouno 1991 lleergrouno ano Co~w•ittoo Ow~~op~w+t 1991 8aek9r0uno. (',pw~it+Op and E:ISt1nq rl~wt Grnt~r Tr~ttle 1991 ®oekgrouna. Caiw~t++b M~0 fr0001e0 -~I see i GI~tOr TrNtlc sOlJ1Cf : ApA, S~~ Sp^u+fs '-ojeet~o to Ov~r~*o ~10~ lOS "0" Ilj T0101) Orr Ot Sf¢Iw~nts ~1rGMt Of TO•~~ s ~e O 0 ~ 3t ~ 3t 1 ._ ~t S. eadit ionel In~orov~e+er-~s Plead to ACCOmR-alete Pro 3eet In+eacts Major portions at the transportation plan designed to offset the anticipated irt~pactS and traffic f lO~s of t"te entire Mi eirti i Ginter project are basso on tn8difieations to FpOT's current design of the Dovntorn t~iStributor System Qifurcbted ~++ps. AS -these improvements Nave yet to be approved by ttie Florida _. ~,~ ~ ;~ ;- o . ~- Y ! W w w = N N 6 ~ i ` 2 ' C 6 ~ ~ a ~ ~. . ~ W ~ • ~ ~ ~ o ~ .. ~ y b ~ /~ y ~y ~ y ~ Y9 y ~ N 1y N ~ ~ S S ~3 ~ G - A w~ ~ r ~ .. r N M ~r [ s ~ ~ ~ S ~ ~ i i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~[ y ~i ~ Vf ® r .. ® ` y V1 N VI M • ~ M ~ W it • ~ `_ C C ~' yy~ o r ~ /:5 ~ Y ~ r y M , ~ ~ y ~ N ~ ®` g ~ $ gg N { N y ~ N i ® /Y 1 ~ 34 ~ ~' ~~~ '"~ . ~~' r, „ E 1 _ [ ~ ~ € t g . ~ M~) so W s w ® so sW ~~ ss ~ s s ~ . ~ ~ j Y ~ W r '" ~~ •I1 w w w h •h hh hh ~~ ww w • h - i ~ ~ W y W~ y =N = N W s W! =N ZN =N =N W W f O' r M _ r 3 3 ~ N ~ g N i g ~ N ~ e ~ ~ a ~ ~ N a = ~. _ ~ a - . _ i ~ Y ~~ i s Z = ~ ~ _ ~ _ _ i ~ N • v ~ ~ xe ~ W W ~ - . ` . ` ~ ~ GG ~ ~ ~ e • ~ • N NN s s i ? ` i i s s i - C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ hhh ~ ~ ~ pa M i I IG y yW~ i ~y S y~ i N W N yW~ N {Wy N ~ R Q ~ yW~ N ~ ~ p ~ ~ V O W h W ~ ~ ~ V ; a ! i ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ E t S ~ N N a ~ '' w Q « 4 q "' N o _ ~ ~ _ ~ O ~ N G N G N t _ ~-~ ~ s Department of Transportation, it is important to note that if - these•mooifications are not incorporated into an at ready • planned and programr+®d transportation improvemen+, then many of • the tratfie assignments ana projected 199 levels of service for roa0aay segments in the impact area trill not hold true. T.~e improvements as discussed by the Dupont Plaza task force" ere shown fn Table 19. In addition to these improvements. the Applicant proposes: (1) conversion of a portion of the eastbound bifurcated ramp fro>n embanlanent ana retaining ra t I to additional structure length to el low passenger car and van clearance for access to the Iocal service roadway, (2) the Biscayne Boulevard Mlay south side service road, and (3) minor geometric improvements et the SE 2nd Avenw and Biscayne • Boulw and Wey intersection. No extension to the ees+bound • bifurcated ramp is proposed. The proposed modifications are • shown in Figure S. Table ZO fists the effects of the project and improvements on critical to+ersecttons aitlin the traffic impact area. >~ t. Aealtren~l trtruetur. X90' . 3Q' 2. RatNn(nq qII s.etton (330' - S90') . 3!• E 3. Ino.p.no.nt ra~lnln9 N11 .truetur~ fOr epnMetor t0 SE 3r0 Avg. Ze0' s 2t • ,c aof i~rw.nt I. fb ppnstruCtien Of .OOIt10A.1 i.M ON SE 3r0 St. bM~w.n SE ~a Avg. MgSE3roAv.. 3SO • : t 2 • /~ r.efln.Nuet Ion 3SO• s 2 eurb .no qutt.r S. Tr.rfte .rgnN . N SE 3ro Avg./dr.e.r~. diva. r.r .no .* Soutn~..t ~; Ffn.nCla C.nt~r qKp~ , _ 6. Aedltrpe.l h.tures .n® •Ie.ninq SE 3ro A+•~. Oaw~n dt.e.rr+. diva. Mir .ne SE 3ro St . 2Z0' :33'/9 (reel. r.l..~ 4r.ffie f~pKff(an? w. "St~r• •ra." eons+ructlee .ej.e.et to Ouoa+t 't s. ibt~t • X90' 0. ibro e+a•p(~ srgninq..rgnalr ntron..no ~arkingti - C. MOr• ~.pllu ~..IntM.ne. Of tr.f4(e ShctCt s ApA TAd6E 20 _ . 19M LEKLS ~ SERVICE MITN FlIO~CT TRAiFIC Af0 Ii~rtCvEMEI(TS - Mrtn ~,rej.e+ rlt,oa+ -rej.e+ i1N~r..etrOn rlth Lara-~.«~t. Ilitaput Iwaa-wM.: ; ~_. g aye Av.nus i SE ~+e Str«t d A SE 3ra Pv~nu! 8 SE 8+d Strsot C ~ , SE 1ba Stroa 3 ~ F)n.netel Gnt.r C A dr.ea-n+ live. t Sd ~u! StrNt C A dlu.,m+. diva. t CM®tn PI a. A • dlu.rM diva. t ~ 3ro Str.~t d A eiu.r>» divo. a So. Mr~r c - Gnt®r t C•.rp. SE 3ro tbv~n~ t dt~C.Yna drva. rer d 0 _ SE 2no IHronure t dr ~.yntY di vo. w.1r 0 0 SE b+a A++.nu. t i-~S 6l.tributron C S R~wp ~ 3rc Avgwu. t SE are 5trNt C C 30(JRCE: ~ 3~ ~ - ~ ~~~ ~ ~• a ,r.,. • ~ f s ,. The adottional costs for the ran+p alteration is that of extending the fro-lane structure approximately fifty feet. , This cost mould be partially oftSet by eilminating lye need for programmeo optics signeltzation and a moaest reduction in right of ray rem i rem~ents along ®t scayne Bout evard way for the Combined ramp and surface street roadways, incidental additional costs could be lnvoived in the ramp terminus treatment Weer Biscayne Boutevaro. Excluding right-ot-ray. t:,e net ditference in construction cost is approximately 580,000. R r'~ y~ Th• wadttionat cost for construction of a separate sout:+ side ssrvice roadray along Biscayne Boulevard could, in part, be ;:a offset by reduCtng the number of red~ired taroug:+ Ines on Biscayne Boulevard way trdn three to tro. More Curb and ~~ gutter, drainage structures. and pavement are needed rith t'1is , ;;, ~, slteration than ras anticipated rich ttie ODA staff proposal. ~r Although sideralk rrs not shorn on the sout~ Side of Biscayne Bout evard way to the DpA aloft proposal , the Dupont PI aza Task Force has indicated that it would be desirable. and it probably .-outd have been tncludett to a final ized iaL?A plan. Sideralk is included in this proposal. The net difference in construction cost between the pi ens tto grin a south side service road ono. tree floe movements from the eastbound rump and twe throug'~ 1 ones on Bi sceyne Soul ward way) is approximately SSS,000. 39 _ • _ .,, • ,~ ,.. .:..y . Table 21 I Ists the three llppi icant-proposed Improvements needed to accommodate project impacts. their cost and the App! icant's fair share. r~ ~ AmIT101ML 11~OVl~ORS TD M OOnMTON OIfr11N1r01~ tltulGlllO UIMr f1sn11 KtQO to nCO~•oOAT~ IROiCT IrAC'i ye l l ewe • rr~,~Nw. ~y,. ta. SrB~ .~~ ... C«w~rsla~ ~~ 11~ t •0.000 f X0.000 tai~+ • _ . ~ _ !NV Ip 11w !!.000 75.000 ~~IC 1- _ ~/ ~ ~0 X900 t1/ •1 W11M ~1N. Ny MK MCA IM 7!lTJll ft7~.000 ~7l.000 f0101C~ t A01~. ~K f ~ Consideration of the ttmtng~ot noeded improvements to the existing road~+oy network is comet iceted in this Instance due to two teeters. The first relates to the design at the programmed Downtown D1 str tbutor tit turcated pan+p system. while the Ft or i da ; Department of Transportatian has been proceeding wit; a tinst • design. the FOOT design tree Figure 6) Does not tactude the ~tO ' ~; • ~ "~~ r ;~ #~~' - - - -- ,, :-.__ -___ __ _ ~ - _e ~ __ _._ -= .. __ _+ _ ~ ~, '!+s ~~ , ~--- I ' I~, ~_ ' ~ ~,' Spit y;i~i11 ~~ ~ ' ~ii~ ~.~,. { E t 1~ ~ ~ `~ 1~*'i -~-~-- ~ ! ~ i E Il'tll ~; ~ ~ i~~ ~ t i- ~ ~ fir'.... ~~ ~?t. ~ i ' r -T i rl IiE3 ~ ~ i. ~ I `~ ~ ~~~ t ,.,. -~'- ~~ ~~ h ' j;i fi mooitications discussed by t;~e Dupont Plaza task tore or thOSe contained in the Applicant's proposed dosign. The second relates 4p t:~e timing ®f tho ramp construction. Originetiy, the project was scheduled tar the current fiscal year. Due to federal cutbacks and other eireumstanees FDOT now projects ttye coynpl et i on for 198®. tipwaver , i t rema t ns uneerta i n >rhether the ttaytng of t;ye completion of the ramps wit 1 be eoinetdent with ttye Applicant's proposed project phasing. Under normal eireumstances, encountering a situation suc:+ as this one would result to a recommendation for project dental and staff woula - hsve requested that the Applicant voluntarily delay Council's Consideration pending resolution of these major problems. Mbrever, working with the Ctty, FDOT and the developer ttiree things are apparent : T) t:yat most of these prob I enys can be - resolved in the Weer future; 2) the project is etonomlcally ta+portant to the region; and 3) the developer's time is __ Constrained regarding project financing. Therefore, start has _~ agreed. at the App1 icant's ro~est, to address approval of tnteriny phasing of the proposed project (naepandent of design - or coincident! with the iifurcated Rae~p syst~y. In order to both aeeurately assess the Impacts caused by ;nterim phases of the project tin the ~9slnee of th! bifurcated •ramps) ~d to reCOynnyend ~e4uate nyitigati®n of those impacts, the surface street network, along witty the preliminary surface street ia,provements suggested by the City of Mt am i s Pubs ie lworks a2 b~ ~ ;~ ~J ,.1 f+V ~~:yy[ .'iF ]~ r~ •[ Department, was examined for the year 1991. The year t99t was chosen because it reflects the most probable year of occupancy' for tease f, The examination Mas based on the fol it9aing • • assumptions: t) on I y one of the App 1 leant' s t~ao proposed structures would be constructed, 2) ttie °ifurcated Ramp system •'rrOU 1 d not be i n p (ace • 3) some form of interim t mprov~nents to - SE Second Avenue and project entrance areas could be undertaken by the Developer, 4) no additional development in the 3 block area directly west of the proposed project site .could take place in the absence of the bifurcated ramps. and S) some form of intersection improvement would be performed along Sic 2nd Street. UnknoMns in our analysis are the precise interim i~nprov ements needed to ensure adequate levels of service. prior to the development and construction of lye bifurcated ramp system. These particulars are still in ttie planning phases. and final tmprove~nents and costs rre to be determined by ttie pity of Miami. However. these are prim arily local road Mays and a preliminary list of possible improvements, as determined by the City's Oepartn+ent Of Publ is Works, includes: . A., Dupont Plaza lmorovements 1. SE 2nd Avenue and Si: 3rd Street Adjust Most curb on publ is I and On sovt`+bound ~' • approach and raijust traffic signet heads as rtquired. t0 Create tour versus present three southbound 4'S "`~~~~~~ • . 4~~ <. ~ ~ ~ • It ±_ - ~- .4 ~.1 ~~~ 1 1~ ~ ~ ~ iY ~ - ... ~'. ~ ~~~ ~ - j~ ~ ~~. '~ - .. `_. {. ~.- +'. I. '~. i ; _.. _ ' ~ ' through lanes. Lant crop to be easily aeco~+ocated sooty of intersection aithin existing pavement through left turn at 9i seayne 6ou t ev and May prior tp = 9rtckel i Avenue bridge approae`+. FApdify signing anc striping throughout section as PeQuireG. o _ 2. SE 2nd Avenue and SE Znd Street ;. Adjust channelizatlon curbing to southeast corner to t. provide tw +eestbound through I apes ana three Y"; _ separate left turn lanes. plus one tree fioa left turn lane inside nrodified channetization island. Teo of the left turn lanes for access to I-9'3 entrance ramp near ~ 2nd Avenue and SE arc Street • one a~andstory and one opt tonal. - Ad Justn+ent of channe l i zat t on island i n southeast - corner t0 also alloa three southbound ttirough lanes. transitioned through interssction aith skip guide 1 roes. One mandatory right turn I ene and tvio through lanes currently to place.) i ;' F- ;; Revise signal head dt$plays• pedestrian features.. r ~, i :. Overhead and other signing, and pavement markings as 1: s`~, required. ^ :,, - i~.:. i;.. E; r {. .: _ _ ~~' ,. - - ~.~. ~~.,~ _. .a.,~.._,~..._ r . «a. ._.-,. - ~. i • . ..:..,. _- .. ~;. _~,, ~, ~ ;I i "'i ~ . ~~ ~ . '-' - 3. ~ - 9iseayne Plaza Project Entrance Entrance and exit drives to be eoordinated rich ultima'i•e b.ifureated ramp design and Cfty of Mten+i Publ iC Wbrks Department. Geometric alterations at project drives near Biscayne i~bul ward Way and At scayne Soul evar0 May. T'~ i s i s to include revised drainage as necessary, outside pavement ridentng rtthin existing right of ray, - ~ signaltzation of exit drive to be Instal-led rnen - rarranted, and revised pavement markings. Also provide custom material and constr~tton for approximrtely 1,Za0 feet of sideralks along project street frontage and riverralk frontage, and all seating, lighting, and landscaping, all for public - use. 4. 81seaYne 8oulward way Access RoaawaY ~~ ~ y p p public right of ray for •Ctt to reserve resent separate t8' eastbound access roaaray south of 8tscayne Boulevard way to extend from SE 3rd Avenue ~, t0 ®tscayne Plaza project south veniCUlar traffic s ~ ' entrance. Preservation to extend at least to date of :. completion of project Phase 7. (Separato acct3s ~ ~ rosdrey rat deemed necessary to project Phase i.) ~~ r. i. 4S ;: , i' - { r 4, ,, . 0 ;; ,.;; ~~ ':~ ;. ~~ right of ray within this block that is necessary to create three ~stbound lanes, an edition of one travel lane. At the Miami Avenue intersection, this - improvement could alloy a separate left turn tone, a seperate through tone. and a separate lane used as a - Combination through .and slant right to the 1-95 entrance ramp. Y '~. 2. SE 2nd Street betreen SE 1st Avenue and SE 2nd ~~. f.~ Ate, w Mlester rvadray plan calls for three travel lanes ~ , rithin Phis section of Si: ?tad Street, to be :.,.r-:a i '- constructed rithin existing publ is right of ray. ~~ t:Tro travel I anes presently prov teed. ) The projected levels of service for street segme~+ts in the dorntorn area f®r iS~t sill still operate I'elor LOS ^0" even . rith the propased interim project Impacts end improvements. ~: Norever, these 199t LOSS do represent an improvement ®ver the '~ ~ ,: ~ LOSs currently experienced in the area. what may be more -, • indicative of the health of the transportation system to this ~: 1.: t%' 46 .,; i. y _ ~, a • . .. ~ :.rte ' _. ~y"- t_i tea: 5'. .~ .. ~ ':t a S ease. ere the levels of service on intersections in th• area as ,' shown i n Table 22. Cr i i i ea I intersections i n the inwneo i ate i area will operate et an acceptable l05 with interim phasing of }, .~ the project. in®epenaent of t.ne bifurcated ramps. providl0 teat ~~ ,. - interim improvements are ma0e to the surface street network. ~. }. . ; ' tMt~t $ I~ft OIITI~ 111RRS[CTtOMs tr1-rOt1T •li{~ICATiC r1M' s'RTDI f •rr rwti-r^ hew e~ e-o;w. A n•~ -s;er K ip-we~• ue-wee~a iwe>+e~*s - IrIN-re+lew ~OS~~~ ~~~ ft ~1/ Are. ewe tM ff. ~M • • ~ ~ ~ i 0 ft sle ae. ewe 7-e f~. +w 0 t 0 wl C 0 • s ~ ~....~. n.e.r» iw e o 0 ' s[ 7-e Ave. ewe the f~. IM • C e 111 i R 0 , . _ ~ 3-e we. Me th Sf. AM [ ~ A r /r A ~ ~ st sp ire. ewe lleeer~e w. ~ e C ~1N. ~etr ~ C C C •leew~e eow./e-e)eeo rw M/e • • _ ~I~e M M/R / ~ t0{~C[e Ad1• SRrC i 6. Parkin Tre existing structure contains 1,150 covered parking spaces. Thi proposed additions to the project wilt provide !' epproxima#ely 1.200 covered perking spaces. Atl Witt be located out of sight inside the building base on floors 3-10. {: ~, Parking access will be vie internal floor ramps and afour-lane ~,:: #: ~~ f 47 h ., i;; . is. ~'~ M ~ ~, ,~ ! _. _.. ,a.. ..~~. _ - c ', ~~. . building entry-exit drive connection to Biscayne Boulevard. _ ' -i t The signalized access drive will be located at the northwest ~' corner of t!~o project site and ed j r.+cent to the 8a I I Office _: parking garage. Perking control will De by both an electronic . ~` gate and a control booth. both of whic:'i will be located along i . _.. the main entry-exit. 1 1n additions the project has tM permanent rig:Tt. through the ~`~ :~'Y site purchase agreen+ent, to long-term lease of up to 600 ~~, a sdoitional parking spaces On !tie rNnaining three-blocks Ot r; „ -: .;,. Dupont Plaza t~nnediatety wst of~the site. Mith the adaition ,o , „~,. ;,, ,,~ ., of the 600 parking spaces imneaiately wst of the project. the ~, -~. . ~ provision of parking should be adequate for Doth proposed and existing structures. ,~, ,3, 7. Mass Transft A a+ajor component of the planned transportation systea+ for the ", Dupont Plate area is a reliance on the Downtown People Mover ;. ~f , •~ system. The system Is an enlarged loop that circles the entire downtown area. The closest existing dP~ station is located . northwest of the srxisting Eali Point developmeflt, as s;,own in • Figure 7. The Applicant's traffic ass~ptions heavily rely not r only on significant transit ,ridership. but also on s~nai 1 ;:. percentages of grace level pedestrian traffic being generated by such riders.ip. Grade level pedestrian traffic needs to be 48 ~.~ ,~- - ,; FlGURE 7 EXISTING Dt'~V'~NTOV'VN PEQPLE MOVER STATION ~lM*OfIT pAfIK / C110PSN PLAZA STATSQN ~ f ~~ tt ' ~lil i~ ~ 14~: M, Ill;( ~ c hr s•IIttT %~) - 1 ~ ' ~ ~ ~ .~. - , ~-~ ~ ~+~.~~ ~ P m G _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tj!h ~ ,, I'liii~''~'' ~ ~ ~t ./ , souTMu~T c i : t1~aMC W. ~ ~ ~. ~ y .+r I (~~'' ' ~ . ._... _ e~wwca ~ ~~ ~ ; w 'R~r~ ~u k. mhttrtr--'-'' • ~~: 111 0 a ~ ' . ~ ~ ir, s ~ r tt rt `' ~ ( b ~"' ~~ { I i ~ ~ ~ ~; ~ ~rtrtt. ~ ~i ~-'~ - tt .. .._.. TM~ WY~LVaIb M1T • ~ SOURCE: AGA, SFRPC . ~-~' , ,. ~1 ntinimited in oroer to ensure that adequate level s of green time can be achieves for the surtac• street network. Mhil• second story peCestrian aelk~ays (as originally proRo~ to the area? ~roul0 be preforablo, internal r+alkr+ays within the Miami linter Brea should be aoequats to miriimi~e the Impact of grade level crossings. i _.... n` ',_- Department of '~ ransportation Miami Regional Service Center 401 N.W. 2nd Avenue. Room 510 Miami, Florida 33128-1794 .se~e-.w. •~ JAN ~ ~ ~ • ^. ~ .~ •. r...~ ,v. Florida ~a o,i.«w oo.a~Mo~ January 24, 1986 ~f: 24 198 Ms. Ane Oeister Interim Director `. South Florida Regional Planning Council 3440 Hoilywood 3oulevard, Suite 140 Hollywood, Florida 33021 Oear Ms. Oeister: Re: Miami Center I AOA and WPA Item Nos. 6113307, 6113375, 6113376 State Job Nos. 87006-3503,•2507,-3505 • Downtown Distributor, Bifurcated Ramps and Surfaca Streets At the a~teting I attended on Wednesday, January 22. 1986 at your office regarding the transportation elements of the Miami Center I Application for Development Approval, :a question was raised as to the status of the construction schedule for the Downtown Distributor and Bifurcated Ramps. Recently the Development Order for Miami Center II expired. That develop- ment order included a provision for the donation of the rights-of-way needed to construct the Bifurcated Ramps section of the Downtown Distributor. It also included an exaction for certain local street improvements that are necessary components of the project design. The expiration of the Miami. Center II Development Order, and thus loss of the provision for right-of-way, has substantially changed the schedule and cost of the Bifurcated Ramps project. The current Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) shows that construction of this pro,~ect is scheduled to begin this fiscal year. This will not.o~ccur. The need to acquire the right-of-way has set the beginning of construction back at least two fiscal years. At this time the Department~is developing a plan for acquisition of the needed right-of-way. The annual update of the Oeoartment's Five-Year transportation Plan will show a financial plan .~.. _. ~ ., Ms. Ane Deister South Florida Regional Planning Council - January 24, 1986 , Page 2 AmO+fnt F.Y. of• . WPA Item No. Oescriotion Type Funds 1 000's Commj~e~•. 6113307 Downtown Distributor - Interstate 4-R Bifurcated Ramps Construction 533,600* 8'/8 6113375 Bifurcated Ramps Interstate 4-R - Right-of-way 20,300 85/6 6113376 Bifurcated Ramps local Funds Z,300* 87/8 . Local Streets Construction ''s - __ T 0 T A L 556.200 -~~;~ x `The Department i•s eurrentty reviewing the construction cost ,estimates. ~•~~~~ ;~~ The unexpected requirement to acquire right-of-aay has increased the public °`k cost to construct the project by an estimated 20 million dollars. Funds . for interstate improvement projects of this type are prioritized on a sta*.e- ~~ . wide basis.- Longstanding commibnents to projects in other areas may impact funding availability for this project. In addition, the Gramm-Rudman Act ~•. and the pending renewal of the Highway Act adds uncertainty as to the level of federal funding in the future. v, The Department's update of its Five•Year Transportation Plan is currently . underway. It is our intent to modify the schedule and casts of this pro,~ect 9 in our Five-Year Transportation Plan, and submit the nrodified plan for the annual update of the TIP. Both the Department's Five•Year Transportation } Plan and the t~0's TIP will be adopted in June. The Department has already submitted a list of proposed changes to the Transportation Planning Council of the MPO which included the modification of the Bifurcated Ramp Project's schedule and costs. If necessary, the Department will take action to formally amend the TIP at this time. Regardless of this, it is impossible for the Department ' • to proceed with eonstruction of this project without the needed right-of-way. . Sincerely, n~,~~ ~ ~ _ ~ ., Thomas L. Thomson District Oir°ector Planning and Programs . TLT:en ~ _ . ee: Jose-Luis Mesa John Taylor • S3 I '~#~#~~ ~~: ~~ ,~ ~~ .. Florida Department of " -anspo~i~tation 101 pAsrlY , OOV~MrOa ~ Regional service c~ntrr 601 N.W. 2nd Avetass -Suite 890 Miami, Florida _33128 TMOIIY {~ OA~~ Jan~saty 16 ~ I986 S. ~. R. P. C. JAN 16 i~~~ Imo. Wi17.imm Powell. Diraetor •M~t:o Dade County Public Works Dept. 111 N.W. 1st Street . Mi.~i, Florida 33131 RE: I-95 SiftSCated Ramps ~ . W.P.I. No.: 6113307 Sr.1u Project No.: 87006-1503 Federal Job No.: ~-95-1(350)2 Count~-: Dade Dray Mt. Pewsll: As s'squested by the Dupont P1sZa Tect3sicsl aubcommittae, the Dena.-Lrt of Z~ansportation teas revieusd the new conceptual proposal for the- I-95 Biftiscated Ramps prepared by Transport Analysis Pzofessionals. Inc. end dated Jta~e I, 1985. It is our recammazdation that this proposal be rejecud on the • following basis. • ~e eaatba~nd and c~stbo~azd freeway segcasnu, includi-sg th! rates wi:: not provide art aeeeptable level of service. • ~e eastbo~aid off ramp to the parking garage and to S.E. 3rd Ave:ale are too close together. Biscayne 81vd., fzo~a 8iscapn~e Elvd. to S.E. 3rd Street ~l1 operate at an unacceptable level of service. .A unde~tirable trio con:iguration of gasaege ent~nee at S.E. 2nd Avela~e and heir relationship wi~i the proposed signal at t~-.at location. We ase prepared to present our recommendations to tht tec.'~ri: a? casri::ee at yvus conv~ience. If you need srry fvrrhrr i~nfossati<sn, please feel $~ to call. ince 7 . E. Rene R. Ro Deputy Directo .or Procaictior. ~.. RRR:~ ~. cc:~ Srrva~o Parapar, Andres g ra, Rrm Hock, Ken Vorce, Frank McGre~r Tom ~o~t, Jint Kiznbler, Pile ~~ "` ~ ;~ ~$ t Mr. Harry Peterson South Florida Regional Planning Council 3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suits 140 Hollywood, Florida 33021 RE: Letter of duly 11, 1985 from Lthan Minsky Cultural Resource Assessment Request Amended ADA for the Miami Center DRI, Dads County, Florida Dear Mr. Paterson: ~£, 'a f4 ~~ In our review of this project `+e noted a discrepancy between '° what is stated as the answer to Question 198 in the above cited k document and what was recommended in the letters included in t.'se - appendix ton pages 19.A.1-1 .and 19.A.2). Whereas the answer to Question 19H. indicates in the event any "underground archaeological resources are uncovered during excavations, a qualified archaeologist will be requested to examine them as required by law," the letters from the Dade County Historic Survey and from the Florida Division of Archives and Bistory, on the other hand, explicitly state that "an archaeologist should be present during the earliest phases of subsurface excavation of the most extreme western portion of the Hall Point tract to determine if such archaeological data exists beneath the fill. The presence of an archaeologist (to monitor) construction activities in thin specific area of the project would insure that significant data, artifacts and features would be - recognired, recorded and possibly recovered before their destruction.". _ It remains the recommendation of this office, that unless this area is preserved as green space, that a professional archaeologist be present in order to observe ground disturbing activities in t.~:e western portion of the Hall Point tract in the event cultural resources - may be present. :,_ . 4, .. - - ~-. . ~ ~ ,~:, t~° t8t~ eF the Arts r»e '~ ,:_. 3 i, =` - ,~~~_ -~;~_ ~'s '3i 4;L ;'4'a: . ~. Barry Paterson August 7, 1985 ~ - Paga Zero .:.r: Tt you have any questions concerning our comments,.plaase do z not hesitate to contact us. Your interest and cooperation in helping to protect Florida's 'F arehaaologieal and historical resources are appreciated. ~''~`< ~~~„ :~:_rC Sincerely, a :`~ `~ ~ _ ~ Gaorga w. Parey, Chiat .. ~~} ~~ , euraau o~ Historic Preservation"`' : , ~_ GrIP/wkp "- ec: Gary. icrasal ,~ti ~~ Aobart Carr ~>~ ti, <' . ~. ;; z~ ~: _ . ~ - ~ ,i== SF . . ~: . .. _ .. -, ~:z; .. t - ~ - 4 _ ,. - ... ~ 'i S ~ - ~ i~~ '. ' ~~_ ~ ~ -. ~ '~1~#f y~ r ~.. I: ~ ~ ~ ` { _. r - f r ~'~- l~- .~ ~r kt :~ _a . _ ~- Attu of _~tittrrci. ~Lari~~t • - ~,~,; o~y ~~ ', - . ~ .,, ' ~ xv~sA ~. Su•ess ', ~,, d ~~ e. ees aaero• ~~..~~. I~Ow~O. aaaaa • OHO ~ December 13, 1985 ' Mr. Russell D. L. Wirth, Jr. ~~,R~P~ Wirth g Company S20 8riekell Key Drive suit. l~oa SAN $I 1986 Miami, Florida 33131 Dear Mr. Wirth: Wirth i Company and its development team are to be congratulated !or your coatidenee in Miami and the private initiative y®u have taken in the dsvelopsaent of Siscayae Plaza, a 5400 million mixed- . .use eomples.which will bw a world-class Miami landmark and the la=gest in our downtown, located at the mouth o~ the Miami River in the heart o! the city. Your willingness to collaborate closely with City of~ieials has made our job o! review much easier and will, S am sure, result in an extremely valuable addition to this great international city. The City o~ Miami has always worked closely with the business an3 dsvelopment community is Furthering the development of downtown Miami. In tht past ten years, we have seen over 97 new public >; - and private projects built worth in excess of S3 billion. Hiseayn~ Plaza will be as excellent addition, bringing both world-class quality-and employment to our city. In reviewing your project, we note several elements which are o: _ = particular b~netit to the citizens of Miami. !'first, Wirth b Company's concept o~ mixed-use (residential and retail as well as ' office space) will create a dyaasaic 'urban village'° aad active people~plaeo is the heart og downtown. Second, the Baywalk promenade, which you will build with private funds and will open !or public use, will link Saygront Park an8 the Rouse Sayside Project to our Congereaco and C®nvention Center on th® Miami - River with k beautigul walkway, restaurants and cafes lining y©ur project. Third, the scale and world••elass quality o;E your development will crake it a Miami landmark and potential rival to Rockr~eller Center in M'ew York. P`ourth, aad certainly not least, will be the 3.500 direct and indirect construction jobs. and 10,000 permanent o~tice tenant jobs, this project will generate, - as sell as added tax revenues Lor our city aad neigh~rh®od ae:ds. Finally, for two years now, Wirth ~ Company has commi,t~.ed its private capital 100 at risk to this city~buiid~ing e~~ort a:~ will attract 500 million of additir~nal privat. institutional quad:, all without seeking public financing, public subsidy ~sr public assistancrr ether than reasonable app~`crvals; act e~rcellent example oi~ arhat private initiative can do with City encouragemerst . ... - _, `'t " ~.~ ~::_ i( • - • • ;?riA ~ `~~ • I'Ot ii ~~ `''~ ,; Mr. ltusseli D•. L. wirth,~ Jr. December 13, 1985 Page 2 Oue to its prime location, Biscayne Plaza is designed to take full advantage of our new rapid transit sad "people wer" ;:£ systems, whieh make our downtown one of the most accessible in -= America. Facing i:ennediately on Biscayne Boulevard and with direct connection to the i-9S ramps, Biscayne Plaza provides ~L quick and convenient access to the Seaport, Airport and key area ~ hotels and businesses with the minimum of downtown traffic. ;_f~ < ~ ,~ ~~ The City stands committed and ready to advance the prompt < construction of the I®95 "bifurcated" ramps into Dupont Plaza. `-~V This will, of course, require close collaboration with the State ?'A Depart»~nent of Transportation and Dade County. Certainly, it is ~'"' one of our highest priorities in improving transportation access to our snare city core. handing is now available for ~ construction and plans are 9Si complete. ` .' As you advance your project through the various levels of `w5".y~' ;a~ approvals required for such a large building program, please be 4.~ assured that the City will provide all reasonable cooperation in ;,` ensuring timely reviews and legislative actions whieh will help ~``r.: ;:~ you in the realisation of this important project for Miami. I wish Wirth i Company, and the ezaellent national development ~"~ team you have assembiod, every success 3n the realisatioa o: the `~ - ` Biscayne Plasa Project. You have my whole-hearted support and the assurance that I will assist whenever possible in your efforts to sell Miami to the international financial and investment eoma-aaitie: whose support is essential for this ~' creative-type of private downtown development. 4 .~ ~{ s Very uiy yo `~",: .~ ~ r ~s' k':: ~ r ,i,4 , Xavier L. Su rez S , XLS: nl A9 _ ,~~,~ - - - •,~: ~ . ;4 _.~, ', ~;~. ~: _; ~;, ,. e, ~.a.. i i i iP 4 ~: • , METROPOLITAN OAOt COUNTY, fLGR10A .. M°_T1A0•~:OE ~~ -~.+ e OfFtCt ORTNt BOUNTY wAN~~e,. DEVELOPMENTAL IMPACT CvMMIT'e? • METAO.OAOE CEN*Eq 111 N.W, f IAS' STREET ~.F.f~P•~ MIAMI, FLORIDA ~3t28~t9T~ c3os~ 3TS.2s:T AU G 1' 9 1985 • A~:gust 15 ~ I985 M=. Ethan Miaskq Hollywell Coiporition 300 p;~ Canter 100 Chopin Plaza • I~..aai~ ilorida~ 33131 AE: Mimi Csnter 1 - CamQliazce to the Biscayne Baq Shoreline Developma~t Raeview Crd~inance 85-14 Dear P~. Minsky: Zhis Ietter is in refszence to yaea project lawn as M3.~3 Cants. I sd . hr~v it will be affected by Dade Co~aty Ordi-~,ce 85-14 (Shoreline Develo~t Review) arsd Resolution 257-85 (Shozeline Dewelap~.t Review M~uslj . his leg=~Lttion ~•as o~ppted by the Co1~s~Ly Ccc~ssion • ir. sn effort to apply ~ifosm dsve3.opmzt st~,dasds rega:d:ess of j~isdictiatul boundaries. In addition to the standards setfor~.h~ a review colrr..ttee ras been established which is charged with the respoaLSibility of f-~.a eac~a project within tha review bo~adary ar-d foz~alating a recan~zzdatian as to lecher a project canfgros to the spirit and intent of tie legislation. Zl~srefoze. before airy final DRI acticm is taFc~, the reGui: e~.ts set:orth in tha legislati®n roast be satisfied. ?o assist you in t.'Ls process ~ I have ®rac osed a c.ogy of t+'vs above sarriti.c:.ad do is . . Lf this office ~ be of. stay assistance please data' a t~sirate to call. Sincerely, ..r '4~~:' David .T. Smi.rh. Coord:.~.atar Shoreline Ikvelop~t Ravz.ew Gx-tratee aa/ jm Fsiclosures . ec; Barry Pete: son. AICZ~ ~ SFia PC Sergio Rodwigurz~ Director City of : Placr>nir~g Dept. . .,~ .. ,~ ~ 7 1. >>j~• i ~ .i.` '. a - - I. f . `. veer ns. ueisier: Per your request, attached is the current status of the Miami Center I Development Arder, with two attachments. Also enclosed is the latest proposal far settlement of outstanding issues as proposed by the attorney for Bank of New York. For your additional information, a memorandum to the Miami City Comm ss i on from the City Manager, dated June 12, 1985, is also enelosed pertaining to an agreement for the developer's use of Bayfront Park, which was not part of the Development Order.. Sincerely. ergs ~odri guez, Director Planning Departa~ent • SR/JWM/r~ - Attachments cc: Walter L. Pierce, Assistant City Manager Donald W. Cattier, Director, Oepartmtnt of Public Works Ethan Minsky, Shea and Gould • Jeffrey Rgr~cow, 5tept, Elector, Davis E~0 . KR~ti+-~C oFr~nr~c~.Y ;"5 .. w .rvd s~.r~~ g,s,,rr ci~~,a~ 3r.•.e los S'9•i~tlc w1s~~~n~ 4~d~ee+ • ~ O ~a. 33C"9t ti~~~w. :,OntSi 13:33.0•'08 M ~~~ IAMt 5EI~C:,:(1 aOCSkiG~.: ~~kEC~CIa ~~. !~' _t,., • 4~ f. \.. .. t,_ ~ ~ Y 7 ~. ~ ':. ~ .. ~~..,, ~ - Yi ., . .. .. ~ -. ..~ 1 .''- CURRENT STATUS:, MIAMI CENTER I DEVELOPMENT ORDER , • k'. The current status of the devel opment, as approved and as built, .is described as follows: ~ - C on di ti on 1 C c~ As App roved . As_ 6u_ Phase 1 Office Tower 805,400 GSF 791,000 GSF Retail 85,000 GSf 96,297 GSF Hota1 (630 units) (634 units) 658,400 GSF 689,000 GSF Parking Spaces 1670 sp. 1145 sp.* Phase II Residential 500 units ** Not constructed Parking Spaces 695 sp. ~_ 2,365•sp Floor Ares Ratio (net) 6.36 4.27 Lot ..Coverage 83S Undetermined Ground Usable Open 17S Phase II not Pedestrian Open 16Z constructed Space at Main Ftoor Level _ *1145 regular spaces can acco4aodate 1485,vatet parking spaces.' **Reduced to 324 units: . letter frgn Mr. Goutd.January 2 1. 1983. ., ;_ • ., ~.ry ~ Page l of 5 ~ _ ~1 M" ++~~ ~L~s N . t. ~. ., I i•,, i~ 8 i i t' v: t• ti f i 1 i ., ~ ~ ~, l x • ~, Comeents are as follows: a. The developer may delete a portion of the project e. g., Phase 2 - residential units and related parking. The Development Order limits the pro,~ect, but does not require that all parts be built. A similar situation pertmins to conditional use approval. b. There is a differenee between the amount of parking a) proffered by the developer and approved by the Commission and b) actually provided for the otficc building and hotel. The Development Order "limited" the pro~eet to no more than 2365 parking spaces and did not make the 2365 spaces a requirement; the developer may have intended to make up the shortfall of 525 spaces (1670-1145) elsewhere ~ the site and the developer proceeded under a valid building permit issued by the City for existing Miami Center I. c. Recent inforn+ation provided by the developer shows that the area for retail and hotel may have been exceeded in existing Miami Center I, necessitating an "after-the-fact" amen dalnt to the Development Order. The current status of the remaining conditions and compliance thereto is described as follows: Partial co~tiance: baywalk tPhase I) easement recorded by Resolution 83-129; February 10, 1983. The construction of the bayWalk surface has been completed but there is no landscaping, benches or street furniture or lighting. A 1900,000. performance bond to guarantee construction of the riverwatk tPhase 2) has expired. R i veraal k easesnen t is being held in eserow by the City Cltrk, per Resolution 83-130; February 10, 1983, to be recorded when construction is coa~leted or by the year 1990, whichever comes first. t Conditions Oevei oper Compliance 2. Project considerations: Caopiiance prior to issuance :-of •-river~+alk amenities building permit for Phase I; Phase --facade treatment 2 unresolved. --bay and river views ~_. --podium landscaping 3. Ri ver~+al k and Baywal k: amenities, easement, dedication, constructi~ and maintenance.- . Partial coarpl Lance: concrete sub- base installed; landscaping, travertine surface and barrier .guardrail npt installed. The Departsaent of Public ~O~rks .installed a .barrier as int~riat safety r~asurr. .. .. _ .. ... . ~., , 5. Upper level pedestrian connec• No compliance; the C1ty fudges ti on to OCM station in Biscayne that OCM station was construeted in ~ - . Boulevard. the "vicin.ity" of 5iscayne ®oulevard • and S.E. 2nd and 3rd Streets. The Current owners of existing Miami Center I Budge that this requirement i s not now feast b1 a because of the station shift of laeation. 6. consider upper level pedestrian Compliance unenforceable. Condition connection between Miami Center is to "Consider" not to "require". A I and II stronger requirement in Miami Center • II Oevelopmen r er has expired. `' 7. Payment or band for equitable Condition superseded. Oade County `° share of interim traffic im- Oeparta+ent of Traffie and Transpor• provements at a time set by tatian letter of April 28, 1979 City prior to issuance of a (Attachment A) accepted developer C.O. Alternate IY which provided a) reversal of two eastbound lanes on existing SE 3rd Street with forced left at SE 2nd Avenue plus an additional westbound thru lane on SE _ ~ 3rd Street from SE 2nd to S. E. 3rd Avsnue and geometric a1 terati ons to _ the I.95 distributor ramp; b) '± extension of one southbound lane on =s Biscayne Boulevard between SE 2nd to 3rd Street and c) a restrieted left on SE 3 Avenue at SE 3 Street. The ~~ developer subsequently maintained that these interim in~rovements conflicted with and were supersede4~ by plans for the I-95 bifurcated . rasps and the associated . local street system. .. 8. Funding traffic improvements Partial camel i anct: 552,000 credi t 4• adjacent to'site: for 5iscayne 5aulevard work. Two other tm{srovements were accdmplished -four traffic lanes on 5iscayne by others: the traffic island in Boulevard from south end to 5iscayne Boulevard near 5E 3rd SE 2nd Street and necessary Street was removed by the Dade dedication. County Transportati®n Adeinistrati®n (ETA) for the Oc~entown Ccor~ent of -retaoval of traffic island near Metrorail and repaved by Southeast - - SE 3 Street. Bank, and tht end left turn lane northbound from 5iscayne 5oulevard -provision of traffic signal at to SE end Strtet was cleared by the SE 3 Strtet. OCTA and eanstruGttd by Southeast Sank. The owners of existing Mian,i C3 ~, .. _. •addstion of 2nd left turn lane northbound onto SE 2nd Street. 9. Dedication of land, equivalent to the extension of Biscayne Boulevard southerly to Miaa~i River to City for public pu~- poses. 10. Chopin Plaza parking provisions 11. Provision of parking spaces for condo~ainiums equivalent to Dade County Zoning Code. Center I have offered to provide the traffic signal at SE 3rd Street. Note that the Miami Center II Oevelapment Order (now expired) by reference, apportioned 531,598 tin 1980 dollars) in surface street improvements to Miami Center I (see Attachment 8). The 152,000 eredit refers to 1 i ne 7 of Attachment B . Note the interplay of Conditions 6 and 7: the developer successfully argued that Condition 6 was superseded by subsequent pions for the I.95 bifureated ramps and associated local street system and then the developer was relieved of 1481,598 (•552,000 noted above) in associated local street system iaprovements allocated to Miami Center I, as specified in the Miami Center IY Oevelopment Order. when that Development Order expired. No compliance, but owners of exist- ing Miami Center I have offered the dedication. Partial compliance. The Public Morks Department and Oepartment of Off Street Parking approved plans and completed final inspecti~ of construction of the parking area only. exeept the travertine surface remains to be placed on the sidewalk on the north side of Chopin Plaza. Phase 2 condominiums not constructed. The level oper's~ original proposal was 695 parking spaces for 500 condominium units. The Oade County Oepartment of Tra ffic and Transportati orr (Attachment A) cited 860 parking spaces for 500 Condominium units. The dtvel oper, by 1 after of January 21, 1985 stated his intention of constructing 524 condominium units (for which 695 parking spaces would meet the OOTT reco~aendation). t-'~ „~.. Ea ~ ~~ ~._ ,-.~ , • ' 12. Analysis of seaw iagact on Co~npiiance: ~lysis by E.S. Iverson Marine Coinauni ti es. 8i of ogi st, University of Miami Rosenstiei School, dated June 13, • ~ 1979. supplied to the City by setter of May 16, 1995. however lnfonaation supplied by the developer to the South Florida • Regional Aianning Council on August • 8. 19®S indicates that the seawall- bu~khead modifications have been completed necessitating an "after- • the-fact" permit. 13. Notice to Oade County Historic Coamtiance Survey of project start. 14. Coepiex source permit. Superseded: issuance of complex source permits by State has been suspended. 15. Construetion coa~nencement in Compliance two years (May 24, 19811. : ,• - . - ~~ II CONClUSI4H5 A!~ RECOl~41Etd0A7IQNS The Mtaeii Center I OevelopaMnt of Regional Iopact (ORI~ is a proposed and partially existing office coaplsx rith supporting retail, hotel, and residential uses located 1n dor+ntorn Miar1 ale 8lscayno day at Dupont ~tata. pevilopsent of the balance of the sites schsduled to occur in two phues trose 1987.1891. In revieri the available data, staff has coneluded that the pro3ect could be develop in such a a~annsr that regional advdrse iaapacts would not bs likely to occur with regard to drainage, storw+ater qq~~allty. rater-related vegetation and rildllfs, rater use and rastewater effluent disposal. Ou it i and i srvio cover this pro,~sct rill rsquir~s a 8sneral e to • s s xs app us , hr,1t for its surface rater a~anagaaent systes. At that tiere the applicant rill need to confi rw that the Fh ami Oads Nater and Seo+er Authority Mater Use Psrmit'Mo. 13-b0a17 has bean aaodiftsd to include an allocation of water =efficient to service this pro~sct. along rich all other coe~ittsd users. '" In addition, a eater Use permit will also bs required fremo this District for any deratering required for the subgrade portions of the proposed ca~structi on . - III 6ENERAI PROJECT RELATED INFORMA~TIO_N The Miami Center I ORI is an already~txisttng and proposed office complex located on a 1.46.acre site in doro+ntown M1ami next to Biscayne bay. >` ~ Bayfront Park. and Oupont Plaza on the east side of 8iseayne Boulevard (see '` Exhibit 1). Phase •I of the project, known as The M1am1 Center Existing, 1s alrtad~r developed on the northern S.dS were: of the site and consists of the Edward ~: Ba11 Office ®uildtn9g (791,000 sq. ft. of offiee spaee plus 14,750 sq. ft. of nta11 space), tfie 634•roo~e Pavi111on Hotel, tht Podium Mhich contains 79 OOO sq. ft. of wta11 space plus 400 parking spaces, and a 300•spact of~'1ce parka structure. Phases II and III. scheduled to be built in 19x7.89 and 1940.9I respectively. are known as Qisc~~n+t P1aZa Phase 1 and Biscayne P1aZa Phase 2 and rill be located on the southern 3.01 acres of the site. The Biscayne Plaza Phase 1 office tower rill include 60 d~rellinq units, 700,A00 sq. ft. of office uses, and 160,000 sq. ft. of rttaii usts and adds 1,200 pparkingg spaees to the Podium Parking Garage. The Phase 2 _ office tower will include 90 dwelling units, 710,000 sq. ft. of office ~_ uses. and 60,000 sq. ft. of retail uses. Exhibit Z shots the Master Site ,:. Plan_for the total M1asi Center I project. At present the sits is toned C80-1 (Central Business 0lstrict). The proposed uses are consistent rith both the coning and Comprehensive Plan designations. This rer,iew has been perfor~ed by South Florida Yater Managesent District to provide the South'Florida Reglonat Planning Cauncil rtth a regional assessment of water-related ie~acts of this project from the District's perspective. .This assesse;ent is not a penrit under Chapter 373. F.S., nor is it a guarantee-for said ~ penei ts. ,: _ _ . • ., ,, ,~: .. ~~ ~- ~--~ - . , ~ . 1 ~- ~i r,` ~ f~ ..~ t • SUBJECT:~SURFACE WATER MlANAGEr1ENT MIAMI CENTER 1 ORI dS• 20S - I antit Considerations s~ ~ acts ps ream passage o o si e flows X Mns ream pre vs post; : ea acct of receivi v ter X arcs s a er •ana emen areas isc arge oca ion an roue : . to receivin Mater X • • c a e ue o .. a e store e . .:: n ro e era ons • • envi nmentit w ter use X o r an roi ro ec ion o p asn encroac nt net bi in tort e X n~en~m ra na ~ ;. a ra~na ~ 1 x r ion er II unlit Con i orations an a X s stns ve Ma ars ~ 0 ;: : . pec a on• it Mastewater di Deal X C. s o: n urn s s em 0. a=a ous as er a s use nor tin N A • E. x ra ion sys e~+s ~ : :: • (1~ At the tiiew of permit application, design details for the proposed surface Mater e~anigement system M111 need to ba submitted. (2) The appt cant wi11 need to provide calculations eonfirs#ing coepliance Rath Mater duality criteria. M • SUBJECT: WATER SUPPLY AND DEVELOPMENT MIAMI CENTER I CRI 85 P roposed Potable Water source: and sewer AU0ors ty Miami gade Water Permit 0: 13-00017 (Alexander Orr/Snapper Creek) Permitted Allocation: 130 W40 Current Usuage; 131 622 "GO (1) Expirition Date: 12.5-89 Projected Demand: 0.785 NGO Proposed Non -Potable Water Source: N/A Projected Demand: RESOLVAULL PERMIT TIME AT :RESOLVED: 141011 r.TgrJMr :UNRESOLVED: I Proiected Demands A. POZA01e ISIGInZigl; Commercial: ate.) 1. enera n rates a. For G801r.3 COMO X X A seasonal demand c. verase/max day ratio 2. conservation Practices f C liance with state law) on X X : S. R-Po efirrication: OfFer) oner an rates A 11 4a. cation rate : R7X X7X WX red uency or abolication 2. Aservation gractic 2 Im K/A I so or nativ an s c. gastowater rfAlee manage 4A g. lyflem _mnt II SMUo Availability : MIA Ao Ull-Sit. a (Pat able and/or Man - table) 0 on a. rguagwafar soyrcls a. Rg"igge wafer _15urces /A /A : NO : !4A (See footnote an page 6) 69, t: f_, • a 3 Water Suco1Y i Derelo nt Cont'd 9. System desion a. Nei Itpump oca ons (existina and :RESOLVED: :AT RESOLVABLE PERMIT TIME :UNRESOLVED: . e N A groposedl D. 9xisting/proposec: drawdowns c. upp y eve opmen (Phhasi ; blending of ootions : . ; NIA s N/A 3. I acts unit i uantit N A a. er a Users . nv t ronmen a s Wetlands are endangered s ecies N/A are en an9er s Kies ha itat N A a n Craterintrusion roue r+a er ur ace water . i er bodies 111 on -site 11) .= e e. on amtna ton 0 u on Sources N A . -s is xistin roos N A -Sit* existin roosed N A - 4. Sui a t t ro ose o ton a t t : 1b.aftasonnavae. ne to use MIA ons t e to assign capaoilitz all a. en o other commit- funts relative to 1pormitted capability • X (1) r (See footnotes on page 6) a 70 71 7- j And II f-sits discosal AQGnCX 40 UMQn%Aan X d.NOUN en of effluGISPOSAI X loots"tial for wastewater rouse): C. S M/A "W&MOul m4zer]Al III On- its discosal A. trealatio Was N/A -L on oon 1! Relative location or :retention/detention areas (separation of SW System frawastswater disposal Svs am) N4A w OWASer Cluse 9 N/A Pt R nod or wastewater rouse "PAWwater recharge; lake : draw th a 0. 1 C-) : NLA Z. rozenfill tar adverse Impacts: (quality a Quantity, i.e. seasonakilljtj NZA -.12intsainim rtguiraiments) N/A C. Qthjr IV Nizargaus materials A* POZIUM for hazardous B mterials use/genfration an"ement a gisjosal Wh dS diflon4f rictigns C. JjL 0:N A N4A N/A 72 777777777 f t, PART IV - SUMMARY AM RECOMMENDATIONS Summer v The Vevelopment of Regional Impact Assessment for Miami Center I (Miami Center existing ana Biscayne Plaza) indicates that +he project would have the following positive regional impacts: e Up to 2,500 permanent new jobs woula be generated by the project ana, as a result, nearly 2,900 additional full-time jobs coula be createo in South Florio&, with a $103 million increase in total'wagss ana S184 million in value added to the regional econamy. ' A net positive fiscal impact of $8.1 million woula be creates by the project. e A reduction in the growth of regional energy consumption would result 1! JM from the energy efficient conservatlon measures proposea by the Applicant for the project. The Council evaluation indicates that the proposed project shoula not create adverse impact on soils, animal life, or vegetation. however, in terms of adverse regional impact, the project woulo: . 74 . F .. • Increase potable water and wastewater demand by an average of 4159000 gallons per day.and generate an average of 42 tons, or 149 cubic yards• of solid waste per day. • Increase annual energy use within the Region by the eduivalent or �t nearly 6.7 million gallons of fuel oil. a S • Increase the amount and number of hazardous wastes generated on -site. • Place additional unfunded demands upon police, emergency_ rescue, and fire services. • Generate 2,464 AM and 2,250 PM peak hour vehicle trips (Miami linter existing and proposed) on the regional roadway network and, along with other development traffic, reduce levels of service on segments of +hs regional roadway network. Rend at i ons Based on consideration of the above specified positive and negative impacts, It is the recommendation of the Counci l to the Miami City Umm+ission that the Amended Application for Development Approval for s' Miami Center I be APPROVED subject to incorporation of t1e conaitions is listed below into the existing Development Order to increase the t' lrr` probability of realizing positive regional impacts ana to mitigate, ly 76 tf � • T;. r " 4 i e_ , ,1'> a r'. •. - - -- ......,......_....�. . a, `: , ..,.,,...ir,.,.-,..u�....v..y..,:l':e.L_..:a_.1.,.:,,,.:Yur. y. it '. '{ reduce, or eliminate adverse regional impacts. Adoption of a Development Order (00) with a cost -allocation different from the one recommended below for construction of transportation improvements will not be a basis for an appeal by the Council, provided that the 00 commits funding and construction scheduling that ensure the required improvements are fumoso and will be.constructed coincident with the project, pursuant to s. 380.01505)(02, Florida Statutes. THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, APO/OR ASSIGNS JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY WILL: SISC8Yne P182a Incorporate the following into the project design and operation to imininmize the cumulativ* impact of project traffic, and Its associated pollutant emissions, on air quality: • Designate three percent of on-slte employe parking spacest located as close as possible to elevator and building • Provide ft+rora i l , hetrobus, ana ft+romover route ana schedule, Information in convenient locations throughout the project. 76 r �r 2. Oesign, constructt and maintain +tie stormwa+er managemoo system +o meet +he foi lowing standards: e Place rip -rap, temporary berms or other barriers +o prevent discharge of constructionorela+ed runoff to +he Say. e ,Construct permanent berms or barriers, at leas+ one foot above grade, along the eastern and sou+hern perimeter of the site. e Retain the runoff from a Z3•year storm on -site, and construct the project drainage system in accordance with all representations in the ADA. e Rou+e any and all parking area washdown water through oil and grease interceptors +o a sanitary sawerline or prohibit any and all washdown or project parking garages. ;. incorporate into the development, by restrictive covenant and lease or sales agreements, hazardous otOorials accident prevention, mitigation, and response standards. A+ a minimum, these standards shall: e Require that areas within buildings where hazardous materials or hazardous wastes are +o be used, generated, or stored shall be constructed wi+h Impervious floors, wi+'wout drains, to 77 -7777777 e Recuire that the loading/unloading of any hazardous material or hazardous waste shall occur in a coverea loading/unloading cock with a spill containment area not connected to the project drainage or sewer system. e Prohibit any outside storage of hazardous materials or hazardous waste. e Reduire all hazardous waste generators to contract with a licensed public or private hazardous waste disposal service or processing facility and to provide to Dace County PERM copies of one of the following forms of documentation of proper f hazardous waste management practices: - a hazardous waste manifest; - a shipmenf to a permitted hazardous waste management facility; or • a confirmation of receipt of materials from a recycler or a waste exchange operation. e Notify any tenant generating wastes of +me penalties for Improper disposal of hazardous waste pursuant to Section 403.727, Florida Statutes. z3 78 ry Tt . ;[4 regulations. For the purposes of this Development Order, a hazardous waste generator shall be defined as the Applicant and any tenant that falls under a SIC code listed in Exhibit 1 attaehed hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and that uses, stores, or geners+es hazardous wastes. Hazardous wastes are defined as Ignitable, corrosive, toxic, or reactive wastes, including +tiose Identified in Exhibit 2; provided, however, that +tie uses in Exhibit I and the wastes in Exhibit 2 shall be simultaneously amended upon the add s+ion or deletion of any or all of the listed uses, materials, or wastes by amendment to the "County and Regional Waste Assessment Guidelines" incorporated by reference Into Rule 17-31.03(2), Florida Administrative Code. 4. Remove all invasive'exotic plants from the project site as ttie slte.is cleared, and use only those plant species specifieo in Exhibit 3 in future project landscaping. 79 4� { S. 1 Nave a professional archaeologist on -site during all earthwork, notify State and County archaeologists of construction scheaules, delay construction up to thres months in any area where — potentially significant historic or archaeological artifacts are uncoverea, and permit State and local historic preservation officials to survey and excavate the site. 6. Contribute the project's fair share, as determined by the City for fire facilities. 7. Collaborate with'Ctty of Miami Fire Department to ensure that appropriate fire safety measures are incorporated into project design and construction. e. Collaborate with the Police Department to incorporate security measures and systems into the assign and operation of the project. 9. At the request of the City, within one year of the effective date of this Development Order, enter into an agreement with the Police i Departmsnt-to contribute a fair share of police capital facilities needed to resolve City concerns. i } 10. Enter Into an agreement with the City to contribute a fair snare of capital facilities required to provide adequate fire service to " the project, or, in the alternative, pay a fair share contribution 2. 2y 1i. pursuant to an adopted City impact fee ordinance pertrining to fire service, if such'impect fee ordinance is adopted by the City prior to obtaining final certificates of occupancy for more +man 980,000 square feet of development, excluding existing development, on-slte. Incorporate the following energy conservation measures into tne. development: a. Maximum flexibility of air conditioning systems to cool only N occupied areas (on a floor.•by-floor basis at -minimum). 4 r' b. Air distribution using variable air volume systems, it feasible. c. Minimum air conditioning energy efficiencies (EER) of 10.0 In buildings less than or equal to 250,000 square feet, and 12.0 in buildings over 250,600 square feet. d. Maat producing areas and equipment (cooking, water heating, etc.) isolated from air conditioned areas. e. Computerized elevator control system in all structures over 10 stories. f. Natural gas or other nonelectric energy sources for Cooking and water heating in restaurants, where feasible. +P • �b g. Solar water heaters or waste heat recovery units to preheat cooking and washing hot water in restaurants, etc., where t feasible. :h.- Mot water temperatures set at or below 105•F where allowed by hewith codes and equipment requirements.` { i. lavatory water flow of 0.8 gallons per minute or less :thanY water closets the+ use no more than three and one-half gallons per flush. r t: J Tinted or reflective glass to reduce the amount of direct sunlight entering air conditioned areas. k. Light -reflecting and/or light colored wall and roof surfaces, with solar absorbtlon coefficients less than or equal to i` z. I. Electrical metering on a floor -by -floor basis._ m. Computerizes energy management system capable of start/stop f. optlmizatlon, aemend limiting, lighting control, and zonal Ir control. 82 } Y�' • ... ''�• x T� r im i ' ` ......k 0 140. If a public sector financing package has not been committed prior to December 31, 1991, then, prior to obtaining any building permits for Biscayne Plaza Phase 11, front-end, which may include arranging loans to, or bond purchases from, appropriate government agencies, S317,000 (1985 oollars) to FOOT, based on an equitable '- reimbursement agreement among appropriate parties which shall specify interest rates and maturity dates, as the development's fair share contribution to the Brickell Avenue River Bridge k replacement. 14b. Prior to obtaining any building permits for Biscayne Plain. in the event the+ construction of the Downtown 81furcated Ramp system has not begun. fund or construct 100 percent of the interim roadway Improvements identified as AM, AM, AM and AM in Exhibit 4 (or suitable replacements mutually agreed upon by the City's Department of Public works, Applicant, ana SFRPC staff), to the City, pursuant to s. 380.06(15)(e)2, Florida Statutes. 14c. If a public sector financing package has not been cow Ittea prior to December 31, 1991, then, prior to obtaining any building permits for Biscayne Plaza Phase II, front-end, which may include arranging loans to, or bond purchases from, appropriate government agencies. $5,027,000 to FOOT, based on an equitable reimbursement agreement among appropriate parties which shall specify interest rates and ime+urity dates, as the development's fair share contribution to the Downtown Distributor 8ifurcatec Ramp system. 84 J' 77777 -A Prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy for Phase 11 of Biscayne Plaza, fund, bona, construct or provide a letter of erooit to FOOT for 100 percomt of the cos+s of roadway modifications, identified by FOOT, Council staff or the Applican+, that exclusively serve Biscayne Plaza traffic. f-' 16. Oodicate ell oesomomts and rights -of -ray which are locatod on t.mo sou+lorm portion of Tract 0, Block i, Oupont Plaza (;soot +:1e Biscayne Plaza property) which are for Biscayne Plaza and which or required by the City, County, or State to order to Construct required transportation improvements, including the second -level . pedestrian system, if constructoa. is r` THE CITY WILL: p 17. Approve no more than the amount of aovelopnent specified by lama use Category in Exhibit S. 1A. As Speicified In Rule 9J-2.23, F.A.C., laentify in the ORI 5 Qevtlopmon+ Crder any approved development, including the acreage attributable to each approved land use, open space, areas for proservation, and green belts; and the structures and/or improvements to be places on trio proporty, including locationst v-. r :. .. ,:F 4..r�� ..a.F.•i �.5,.��F s..x:%}3 ,.S'�� d c .., .l..a.er2�6:....t.._ _ acreages gross sausrs footage, number of units, and other major characteristics or components of the development. 19a. it a public sector financing package nas not been cem1+ted prior +o December 31, 1991, withhold issuance of any building permits for Biscayne Plata Phase II until the Applicant front-encs, which may include arranging loans to, or bond purchases from, appropriate government agencies, $517,000 to FOOT pursuant to Condition 14a. 19b, Pursuant to s. 380.06(15)(e)2. Florida Statutes, withhold issuance of Certificates of Occupancy for Biscayne Plaza until all interim road Improvements identified in Exhibit d are constructed. 20. If a public sector financing package has not been committed by December 31. 1991. withhold Issuance of any building permits for the Biscayne Plaza Phase 11 until the Applicant has front -ended, which may include arranging loans to, or bond purchases from, appropriate government agencies, $5,027,000 to FDOT pursuant to- Condition 14c. 21. Withhold issuance of any certificates of occupancy for the Biscayne Plaza Phase li portion of the project until construction 1' has commenced on (i.e., upon execution of a contract for construction of) the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp system. GI t 96 i ti- A • tz 22. Issue a CRI Development Order in accordance with the following criteria: a. The ORI Oevelopnent Order shall specify: , e The name of the development. e The name of the developer. e The authorized agent of the developer. • A steten+ent that: The Apollcation for Development Approval (ADA)-is ' approved: or The ADA is approved subject to conditions, specifying the conditions; or • The AOA is denied, specifying the reasons for genial and changes in the development proposal, if any, that° would make it eligible to receive a development approval. b. Findings of feet and conclusions.of lew addressing whether and the extent to which: �i aT 5 3 -�^A x L ,-u • comprehensive plan: and e The development will be consistent with the recoemmenaat ions of the Counc i I DR 1 Assessment pursuant to Subsection 380.06(11)1, Florida Statutes. 9 The development makes "adequate provision for the public facilities needea to accommodate the impacts of +tie proposed aevelopment" or the City commits In +no Development Order to provide +Mesa facilities consistent with the approved CRI development schedule. parties in discharging their statutory duties under Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, and local ordinances. Substantial compliance with the representations contained in the Application for Development Approval is a condition for approval unless waived or modified by agreement among the Council, City, and Applicant, its successors and/or assigns." 24. Incorporate the Council CRI Assessment by reference Into the Development Order, provided, however, that nothing set forth in the Council CRI Assessment or in the CADA shelf be binding In any way upon the owner of "Miami Center existing" (the northern, developed portion of Miami Cen+er I consisting of the Pavilion Hotel, the Edward Sall office building and garage, and associated uses), its successors and/or assigns. 23. Provide that +40 effectiveness Of +MO Development Order shall be stayed and no development permits thereunder shall be granted, until such time as an Amended AIDA, providing updated information, Is submitted to the Council* City, and State and an Amended Development Order issued. if Biscayne Plaza Phase I is not under • construction or built within 3 years from the effective date of +"a Development Order. Should +ne Development Order be stayed pursuant to +hls..condi+iont nothing herein shall be construed to limit Condition 29 below that +his Development Order runs with the land, and its terms and conditions are binding on the Applicant. its successors. and/or assigns. i 25. Designe+e an official to monitor compliance with all conditions of the Development Order ana specific ma+i+oring procedures that, a+ a minimum, require: • Oevelopment Order conditions to be reviewed by the City prior to Issuance of any local development permit. and • for any condition that cannot reasonably be monitored as part of th• local permitting ana inspection processes, a notarized affidavit from the Applicant assuring compliance with such ` Development Order conditions to be included as part of +4e a annuol report required by Condition 27 herein. 27. Require that an annual report be submitted to the Council. Ci+y► and DCA on each anniversary of the effective pate of the i Devilopmsn+ Order, which report shall Include, at a minimum: z a. A complete response +o each question in Exhibit 6. b. ldentifica+ion and description of any cheriges in the plan of development, or in +tie representations contained in the AOA, or In +he phasing for the reporting year and for +he next year, 777777 c. A summary comparison of coveiopnent activity proposed and actually conducted for the year. d. Identification of undeveloped tracts of land, other than Individual single family lots, that have been sold to a separate ontity or developer. is, ,Identification and intended use of lands purcNasoo, leased or optioned by the doveloper'adjacent to the project site since the Oevelopnent Order was Issued. f. An assessment of the Applicant's and the local governments coepl lance with the conditions of approval containeo in +tie OR1 pevelopmont Order and the commitments which are contained In the Application for Development Approval. g. Specificatlon of any amended ORI Application for Oovelopmont Approval or requests for a substantial deviation determination that were filed in the reporting year and +o be filed during the next year. r ,s h. An Indication of a change, if any, In local government jurisdiction for any portion of the development since issuance of the Developnent Order. ; �. 91' Y i i. A 1Ist of significant local, state ana federal permits wnich have been obtained or wnich are penning by agency, type of permit, permit number, ann purpose of each. j. A statement that all persons have been sent copies of the annual report in conformance with Subsections 380.0604) me (16), Florida Statutes. k. A copy of any recorded notice of the adoption of the Oevelopn+ent Order or any subsequent modification that was recorded by the Applicant pursuant to Subsection i 380.0604)(a), Florida Statutes. 1. Copies of one of the following docLoo0ations of appropr•iato disposal of all hazardous waste: • a hazardous waste mrnifest, IS a bill of fading from a bondea hazardous waste transporter indicating shipment to a licensed hazardous waste facility, or . k. • a confirmation of receipt of material from a recycler, r waste exchange operation, or other permitted hazardous waste management facility. su. t : 42 �fi�Mt - f t_ me Any other information required by the Department of Cdn+n+unity Affairs (DCA) in accordance with Sec+ion 380.0604) and (16), Florida S+a+u+es (1905). 28. Incorporate into +he Deveiopmen+ Order for Miami linter a timeline showing the project phasing, specific elemen+s of the project plan, and conditions of the Oevelopeent Order which are +o be net in each phase or by Other specified dates. 29. Require, within 30 days of the effec+ive date of +he Oevelopment r -•r; Order, recordation of +he Miami Center Development Order with +he Clerk, Dade Coun+y Circuit Cour+, pursuant +o Sec+ion 380.0604)(d), Florida Statutes (1985), specifying that the 'Development Oraer runs with the Biscayne Plaza land (the southern portion of Tract D, ®lock 1, Dupont Plaza) and is binding on Miami ;r5 linter .loin+ denture, its successors, and/or assigns, jointly or severally. 30. A++ach copies of all exhibits referenced in the DRI Development Order. • CODE FOR WASTE TYltS COMMONLY ASSOCIATED WITH EACH SIC IN . AY A : Waste pesticides S Washing and rinsing solutions containing pesticides C Empty pesticide containers 0 Spent tosaphene solutions or sludges from dipping E Spent pesticide solutions or sludges other than tosaphene from dipping F Dust containing heavy metals C Washings and rinsing solutions containing heavy metals N Wastewater treatment sludges containing heavy metals I. Waste ink J Ignitable paint wastes containing flammable solvents Ulash point less than 140'r) K Liquid paint wastes containing heavy metals (cadmium, chrocium, mercury or lead) I. Spent solvents r Still bottoms from the distillation of solvents _ N Filtration residues from dry cleaning operations 0 Cyanide waste: ! Strongly acidic or alkaline wastes Q Spent plating waste: ; R Waste aasmonia S Motographic wastes T Ignitable wastes (flash point less than 140•r) •U . Wastewater sludges containing pentachlorophenol, creosote,' `.or vrsenie V Waste fomaldohyde W Load acid batteries X Waste explosives Y Waste oil P ' Z Other 94- «. d LIST OF POTENTIAL NAtAMMS WASTE CENERATORS IT SIC CODE& SIC Waste Trowe Oeoc•iptiM SIC Wage* Tfpe• Otscriplieo fade Code ells -BIB/: tpiCRiMf[ It�l It seeliq ••A Sleet Notes wt% IIe1 LT Gies• and Classes Week gists &K core loth LPWT tacovatswg and loundsties Weib ell/ AK ¢s4g« - IHe JtLPWT Special trade eoneracter• sets ABC Tobacco fill AK Sap# crops l/12-34N: MANWFACTMNG IM USINIEi 0141 AeC Vegetable OW poi« Formals OIF$ AK gees/ cops' seta Cseetd Specialties 014 hoc Ciaoee Vomit Gravest !MI Canoed end Ceara fish and $esloods else ABC Oteeeeetot Floricaleore 0 floreerf Iftedects Bill 1.4 stood Hanes fabric Mitts. Wool fill ANC Gea*tst fora. rgisetilf Cop Bobo Lie Wewas Well Lva®ah end gave Os•i*vy till ABC tool Celts* foodlots lows Leo Mosierv. *scope Weava's full Looseb 4 to mash Oils ASC tool Cates*. escape feedlots Ia.B.. Imeboal Bass tM gait Oetoruras Moils 11114 AK Uo*o a" Cost Forms I?Se IN tell Meatlaeat dills Oit's AK central Livestock also IN Coccolar teal la®sic Willa OFII AKT Soil Preparation Services ass L`s Waco this fabric "Ills Mtit AKT Coop Floating. Cultivation. else hetectles lost LN trilling Mills. INC 1 W LPWT Crop loeveegiag. Psieetilf by Machine 2241 LM Fisiobeso a1 *toad Wevee lobgic• of Callao _ IIkB4 1 Cellet Gisaoisd I161 LN tieisber• of Blood Wave* fabrics of Mae -!lode Oti4 AT Gew*ral Crap Sorvico• gibes and sill feud A Livestock Services. aneept hrviets for &aalso$ 1269 Ll Fisishaeo of Broad Waves fabrics. Maw -Made fiber Specialisiea Old Silk Vet A Loom end Cardne Service• fall LM Where Coerces end tells Mt AT arsomentes Sbto► *od Tr*e Services ilia LN togged Coop*#* amid eras live tal Carpets *mid toss. INC •ck .mi M111-0lsl: PAtigriT 1414 JttF Wood bleb*e eabiseta 241S JILT Meedvoed Veneer and /tfwod 111M AK Tin►*# Trscte 1414 J111.1 Ssleuood Vto*eo and Plowed "to AK forest Macercie* g Tree Seed Gotberial • I4st JR/i Mabile Moses Estractieg lest JtLI Peolabliceted Wand la.ildiog$ and eanp.ae*at. 41IM AKT Forestry Services 11691 M Woad ►oeeorviat 1492 in par a islebasra list -Iola: CONSTAKTION fill Joint Wood Obrsehaod toraigult. *scope opholese isle MLaPQ Ms" as4isld 1411 tmm Mi live and gtr**t Conotractl« g f isle JtLYT Cabinet V ao4 WOsd h end ladle Cabinets Ibit LPWtT Bridge. Tosses. and glewss*4 Miglwef Cen•teactles isle Jtl`IF Iloueebold furniture. KC - trio PT Phtmhiag. llt*liet leavers tlecetiel and Air Isis JIM Wood Office Foggia*#* Conditioning Isis MLNFW 1ie$at allies Furniture till JILT Pointing, hpet leontigt. Ied becerellet. M•ovf tbel JsLMT Wood ►alsities$ sea fineac•is Cosettottiee. NEC tse2 MtJatNO Meal Pesaiiiess and Fiatott• Ir41 1.1' Tarretes. list. M*#bt•. and "stoic Werb 2411 toriv Pulp Miss* 1•Isi Me floor Lalieg and Other Flooroerk. Kc 1e21 LN►TF parer 16119. [scope Buisdiat Paper ~ills i 2411 LBW gT hpetb000d Mill$ *got% ri *very bso b*os ideatilied as a V!eatio/ generator of basordeee was 2641 ILI ►apex Costing and Marine L sow04wio abet tbo Industry may gostgoa* corrosive. reactive. itailoble. IK 1 Its, Bate. tacept Iratile Baas - ,six$ coast nooses. $04 esverse. SIC cane Oita. Soil #,strategies $*twice*. 2445 lip flee -Cos Paper awl Paresbassd and C*tJboagl o tenlial eneraeog of logic Pesticide #sates. garb SIC code ti•i*d in 14e4 lip /rostra awl Nwlaed Pair lauds tREr l her pRrrse.raly been Baca raced .an eb* isteseaese as a tageeaeal ?4:0 loop Cowvestra Paper and Pap.'/4.9/e41 Irud+sa•. "I {� g enetotog of h*$*tdaea* *ease. J411 IL► faNanl Iaee.4wo.a sew• `;ey� obi' HP Set-e• P Iaprebwosd Adar asel" • *01 .ateenetete clsaeified 24,61 11#, IugrraaerJ sad Soled weber Muses NIt • not el•ovb►ge stattsllea 1 Cade coat MAP ILPT twit•#y fro: Coololwars 11/1.. L. sees L Slse* Cut Sl•eb L rinsing$ tat% UrT fifes coos#. 11468. Nwe. Md similar` hmi.coa Leaelsee Clove• L Believes F6131 LOWIT euitding Paper "a swilling sesed Mille L Mssra•e foolurst. &_afore AlUlelic Jill *Store M*wopspero: ftbliohies and pelstlsg olio L 1+ftAN& Ills NIL"q feliediealo. fdlidiss a feimliay Lill. L Mem&n's mondbogs • fogies _ Fill li&LWQ stabs. Fmhlia®ins sad frielies Ill:. L 1&rsowsl l.*alhro "oat Fill lllLe" Sad printing ' fife L Lesllotr Coeds. NI.c lice mftorg Commercial fse #Is11og. Lesleapress a scream 'Ills 1f flee class list NILWQ Ce werelsl faimtisg. Ulliagrophie Ial JRL bits Gad Seraglm#al Cloy Ills , l€tit MILWO ewe#s&ins ,,add Foote printing Ms JRL Ceramic Wall sad Fleas, file Folk IIILOM Commercial ,rsis/ieig. Gravers IM JRL Wallow Chios, flumbias Ite@oso• and sa/losres'' Ifte 01torQ Mswilola saainesa tare Accessss,i&s ll8l miLOPQ C#&eting Coca fea:liabins 1.41 JSL Mi/cows China 9s►1� and lissh*e Article Pest m@LC" slosklwsde, iseaelfal. sishro. MA Melts# ;.... SM JSL fins Ie.th*oral* fsibilfwsel Table L gsa/h&w f. M1, toILIWQ sad►iodise sea *slated Ilorl AHicle• 1F11 lllLitfQ Type•e@tisg IM4, jet faccelsin Electrical Supplies BSCs 1 Albatiea and Aleeioe 1:0119 JRL, fallacy rrodects. WC 11t4 fOpT Inorgswie pigmast• /al I Abrasive fsedeces Mo for"ST, ladeetrist Isocessie Cl►emieals. •IC 131 L11 Corbels, Fagoting and Sealing *e&icos fgll L.lo1T fieotice. Matosisla. Syelhetic 4sise. sea 3111 t Mass releases. Steel usebs, and se/limy mills Mes•eerecssi®a►/o @0sslaMere fill 1 Ilselresrtsllmrgecel fssJw to fell MIT Syntsotie saber l/is T Stool Vigo *Samoan and Aloe# Mails awe Spites Mil toil Celsmisoie lode -We fibers 1114 1 Cola sailed Steel Sheol. Strip. sea sass 81tf, tNIT synthetic Oceanic ri►ero. sacept Csllsimsie /ill. T Seems pip and Tubes &r11 siological foodeceo 11:1 • _ i#or Iron forndgins lest Modiciwsis fed $etesicala MI • loalleahle Igoe 10"Ohits hole at fhermsceetical retpegetions DM T Seers Femadeses. Mar ttiel FLNIV Soap sd Motor balerlent•. except Speciality fill • primary Sm•lleny and sflissing of Load Cleswore logo. T frioefy Swelling and srisnsns et zinc 2#41 ALfMTT specialty classes*. polishes. era Saslrslies fll: f psis•.. ►o•dmilsoa as elumiare freps#aliens flag T flisgry Sm*Itiws AwJ sffiwins o1 Kowlereaes t$s1 fEloTT Smrtsce ACti&• Agomis. fin/•hlme Aseste, Mrealc. not selteealsd Oils. sod Aseislssts Ilbl f Seesnda•y Sorlling sad setiniog of Mewled."• lstfc My fe#ouue. c0io"liee. sad OlLee toilet feeporstiMa N&eals onset fCulpT point aaad AM&# fr•docto llsl mUWM sellios. *#wise •wd 10Icedosp o1 Capps, Mt LOOP" Cam and Mead Cbemicsle foss Mtel*pQT Alesimum Sheaf. plate •sa Fail xs�s T Cyclic Kist Vogl cellars. aid Cyesie INe"Walotes. Ilya an" Alwsiswm Iateaded f#wdeces *yen. and Megooie figswo; tLdes sad IMetal loss 1110101,41, Alwwiwwm sallies sea slowing. WC P"T LNPTT Isdwseriol Orssese chemicals, KC 11s6 ausirQT selling. *ramewg dad lsegedbes at unlfecses lot I Miesssteows feteiliseco Metal. Incept Copper sal Alwasaw 10t A$[LMT foolicide and Asricellwral Chwleelo. KC list usiso T slowing and Iwous•lias of Mawle#gams Met& 2006 Adlseoieoe end Sesteses sibs T Atwiww resedfies leastiopel 'Vott Imp/ssi&ee lob: T stabs, $toilet. Copper and Copper ease Altar "set IFCI.lof r#see as$ lob rwundrit• Potole ~IT Chfmicst frepe ,stio ss 1161 1 Nwslerrws remodel*$ lCasl iw$al. NBC #$ V rettoteme s*Ieeiwg /ins INNOFQT Metal meet localsng i $ t aap4ese Feel* sad Caafimga slog M111MQT Feinaes Clreol rsuJefl+. Mli j l V Lmbtacetiy tests, and Cses•re 1M Ilofsirtp lowest taw• fewdes$w-e6 folseseea and Cast. WC e.1! MUMInP wise Sweroing lager@•, Newc; 11100%. and past• 1lD� minterserll•wraaes f/&alit fisaesse• Ilsfnm lrliwses.eagI 11 P t Ltollser Taowiwe a" fesiehiwg let# slowirQ coil ores g� gl;t'TTlwrirhe'fe e-IsgslliR! NIC Nut &Isrmhtl♦ ilasssised 1 �'i al tic lfort® Irpes sic Wallo, type* orectivoise Cost 1411 Nowt a" 19400 Too$$ Escape wocbiee Tomes a" ISIS saw" air a" Gas complossoce Nona Use SSG% 0.1"rq slower 4*4 94111410tt frotiossise fees a" Iowa Al age 111"09 Isar OLM" Wool F6064POS roseate 4 Owens T4 M 11ordwoes. - Mc. "*chemical fewer TO&I410iso,ise Ildiparma. we Utl OLM" taterlird from sod Siegel Semlestr# 10010, ISO MUNWOT General- teaselol is$ flacki0vor sea 1448purat. sea McAfee feature fittings a" loin Islass, COW%$ Isis Kletwq Itiocifemic com"Gone 414-tipmelso toter/ Ifectsic WA'vsfb iait IS1-4 avolopq calculalifto 6 Accowelies staghisoo. opec.-Of Formative, flocolonic FolowlCO104 safmclares Mote1 Isle *L"PPQ Office, 1466%imot. 9114 summ Metal Dust*. Setbi. remove. Mistakes. a" Wes ISAR Ove" Comw6cial Lowswool, Day C10841*4. 404 rovsse"It fabricated OlIsle work "achief* $base 160961 work ISIS 11"NO Air conditioning and Wage Air family lquile, WHOM Accloillocturst "A fteeftestal Minot verb; 604 Commercial &04 lieduslaial selfillworsell" reedabricstea metal balidiess and compostate U64 1M Malt miocetlo"olso "so verb Ma ELM" Measuring goo sispossins Pumps klew owbiot Proolecle )Sao ww" Service Iftelowletry, 10"Goofteq. SIC 101 MAUM 5*196. Note. Rivals, and washeto Isla ULM"w cotbar*1669. fielefts. piston Rings a sellers 1461 otxam free a" Steel #*otiose Isles *"binary. [scope almocirrical. Kc 140 NLWWQT 44040*tigt Stampings 40r" lowelf. Dielfibutona sea specialty loomstdontes U&S 01.14"W Vseltol$ ftempiate, NEC 1601 ULMWQ Swelchgoar 664 Switchboard Apperaid4 loll leactr*016tials. reliable$. 001811611. Aaedislso@. 1611 NLOWFQ "aides a Costragols sell colgriot W1, KWFQ ladoettlial Constalsi 14 Pit t iQc cutting. 94trovies. and Allied services, NEC M11 NL401Q Voiding Apparatus. livelvic Small An" Awwwwailies 3624 NLvotQ Carbon to Cos olhiew pledowle Tubs! Ammmili**, except for %&If Arm. KC 3610 Ma" clocifical loodustlial Apparatus. V11c and Accesloorita. SIC 3611. WWII lhaas*loold arfiriewsalows sea Same o" fare Forvirawrio Stiesm. Coo. 4" sparealiz Turblees 1614 Kill" flocloic Noustwooes a" last Iftepteall combustion goalose. sic 1416 smarq Irwifts Mackieve 1111 st"" -fare "alliftery a" letairsorat 1619 W."" 11"Oolkeld Appliances. sic flpt OLWWQF Cord** Igoe lure a Low & Carder Equipment 164110 NLIWM 1110catic Loops comallactleot "ackimorr and Equipment 1") IRM" coorts"$-Vallyies wife Dolvicts Mt Mul(wer Himisa machinery 004 loquirwas. escort oil field 3610% stmeg Residential Electric Lisleliag rioter*$ Istr WORMT oil field Mootbiever a" 9401roams 16416 sLqDF9 Commercial. Indsolliss. 604 laolitoolieses ISIS almr" comortrage &" Coevelies josipwas Lighting fassuges IS11 Industrial Tracbs. tractors. leaflets. and Vehicaler Lijklina log-eirawat stsrbtes HO I NL*Irq Nadi* a tolfwasies socaloolms sees llubiale, Toole, metal catalog last sit%" fteologroph, &@coca$ a" Pro-vocagdold 9146ftelic tatell Machist Vessel, West forsifts Nug" Radio sod Television trasomillifts. sissaliam. 604 Stoeckel airs a" tools. sit Sale. Jilt and 110toctiala togaiparal saw Apparatus fialutQ§. aloold $",*$leis$ seellft 3614 USK" somicandsclers and selsted Devices mattint feel liketeeeffive a loodealing Sal 161S KINW9 Electronic corecolets :1$166 otmmw tb"t bristle send 110009 "##*I wowbials UP? suetw" 11locatemic Coals. Itsmolawmets. 404 Other to fifthimsel. NEC hit Klulpg elocerealic co"notemile. NEC 1wUww Ira" Prollorts, ""Liimofv 1691 N"W Starts# sallegiles 'feallie, salciiiarer 1691 NIPQ Poiftoof §411ruies. set anel Wet geons'efoobjet fasehialpf'r motor Iveloscles sad rassreseld-1 Call &Wee% Wk u�*"w 'flopeor Industries, lescolioarry 1114 01010l9v thsoac Vehicle Paves add 44criG000los ftsatifts looses oloctolverop an* 1406 re - Was 11141 asm" 1604400 0140woo get ww" SloiciSt foodoiat I I .Jgst 4 ones, ro, Inc 1llt 1111&el'tl am" allow# Ailegall galtines and loopiar 1`6116 sell a" xolftlgrotiose - is Poo ye, &#$coati fleets and 4-44816401 toloolparal. 046 W-1. owaifird Of I but t-liewliver classoloo-of 4 till; Waste tires sescrip/ime SIC Vast@ types Meectopliaei f:elr cod@ Pat Ntflcopr Ship 11*140iwL aM *rpoiriq 4S11 ! Air Trewfp•ttNiaw. cetlifica/d Carriers IM 411.00" Mat wilding ad sepaioias AYt V Airpotas sad forgot 620146 not stmwo Lngiweefies. Scioali/ice Lobate/efp Sea Msesech 4511/ LTV Airport Tersioal Services - I` foateomrMa 4612 ALPTV Coo" postelvym popo trove j slTJ NLAlt" Automatic Caatsols 1" 8ee010/140 sesidewlial a" "of JelpT! blue! ►eltolres pope 11nrf . Commercial eavirommrale am! Applis*eoo 4619 ALPV pipe Lines, tort i1B1 sifslp¢ lebattiol loseraooneo fog NNsoasiy, Matter. "A &M LT user&"* Cmmmumicalism twits •r'sdiol Central *1 1leeceso Variables, and selolrd 4411 Li Radio srsdcastinp psaaacta 4511 LT Tslovisioa steadcastiog er4 Nt"" tetelifies !laid selees td Coolies offices 4911 V Electric Sotvigso kilt N"11W9 toslemmeote low Stesasrlws a" Toolie* et 4911 V electrical 4 tether Sesvic*s .elsclgici/y mad electric ;isuls 40I1 V Coo 4 Other Services tort woore Strategies ad Comgrellims office, tilt 40" ! Comhinele•a *tilocief. KC % tgll Kamm" optical lootfmmsnte sod Leases Lost V Sewerage Sretrss IStB stl111l4 Sugsical and Stedital losiremess ad Apptrstoos 40$1 ! s*fos* Systeas DsAT IILIgpQ Orttlap*aic, ptasthetie. sod gaesieoi Applianess Otis am Somilary Services. par a" Supplies i1PAT IIE11DpQ *eotoi C"ipmeot and sappllos SMI-Sles: 11114149SAIt TSAs[ last stme" Ophthalmic Coed• tAkE IIt.1K" phalepgaphit ceaipwom/ aced Sglprlfes SN/ V strop a waste Negotiate. Molassle tell NLXOPQ Watch". Clacks. etc. Sihl LPIT ekrmicals and Allied pt.gaecee Yholesole kill 1001 fQT Jewelfre Flocioee Stetol Slel A /sre Supplies 1014 t1Lmew 5oleerrare. plate! Wove. sad stalnless steel Were SL1s MILT paimea. Vagaishes. sea Seppliso Pill NILM " Jesefer's fiaaiws® L Mslewials L lapidary Week 1041 NJRL11opQ Cassae.e Jeweser and Cools" 11"allies. escort SIN-Se114: 011TA1L TRAK 1 ►eeciose setae Tt1r4 NJeIJtsRQ Needles. puss saeha and spat. awl Noeiler 5:11 JILT psial. Glass, sea Wallpopeg Stages ' Netiane SH/ AIRT sararage Slaves t T"T IIIA'LtIf11'Q Gies/ smd ",vertlaiws ileplsps SNI JRLF sAkile None Desloge i iffs mil69tfDpfl series .Coohese Sill AIJst *Weparearme Stares E "to 19,091, #LSMIr'T Stswmiscloosims ldastries S179 Aint siscelleaseas Geartal M@tcheadise Slar*a 4011-4e5e: tiu"S/O*TATIO* A11* I MIC sTiLltles SSII LINT "slog Vehicle *ralsvo tiler 4 Used► Ws L0111 "slog Vehicle Dealers Iosvd fholyl 4011 JRLTT Nalisaade. Llne-Nand tsp@rall $SII LM sale S Now Supply Sieves ,.. 4111 LPMT Local sad Suburban Transit SS4I LMY Coseliar Service Sessions. btail 4011 ALTt swilthies A tormisal towb#iob eats SSSI MY tn•/ Desloge 4flif LPW Local F000swgse temospersatien, KC SSTs LMtf fNtoeeycle Dealers 4121 L"m Tssicaks SSee 910111 Automotive **&sego. SIC 4#iE 1./1t11 Integcitr awe %wol 1112hsay ►asseases Sill Naseehola Appliewc* Serest. Mtsil Ttsmapasaatiwn Se4I LT Automatic Strtchoodisims Machias Operates* ; 411f L"" 0ekaal seese Sell ! feel ` Ice *@slags '. till a ltoiosoe~* 6 Service Facilities fair Statos Vehicle Sesl V purl oil **&logo paseciHof Trewspolle/iso SM ! Liewfird prlteloos Got Nealees fills AL1fFT Lat•1.Tsechimg'eeit!last Stags$* TI1f-soft: StAVICIS io19e1S11111S 01V Jit./MT firwebfog. eacept Local - ---- f" .4,11 Asti" Lacot loething •ei1h.5tars4* I115 to Coio fopsostr! lanoaeors &na girl Cleaning t 4I g JfIPT1P tgeechiog Trrmiaal Feailiti*a 1114 LM Wer Clrenso: Planes. $memo eye Cleonemg 4.ft JRLl41!" *.S. postal S*tsice (V*hiesr St&in/owamco "III Ill/ Isf hops awe 1lpholserer 44T ` : ,. poop Sea sei igo Ttoo•pertaliaw vita In Inauastial I.aynaveves � Ate�e�s` Nag4rr,C[r1go,Naraliwg If41 LT /unreal Srev•.rs mad 1'•r+.as.vor+ 4wglr A1."T looser Toonapetsotiaee Services. KC fill 1J11ts Aasaemr Aderetisinp Sroveers } a� jo'-a f efoomAkere clotsifir!" *!1: • "Mot *isteeMtt rirssil•ra ( _. � toot Ioc rM in flit Lot flit Lot 1041 AM TOO "t 1 Tel LPT in$ OMST 110 Lpf ?lot Tot f LWF ?$IT f%It live rim psis M11 Psis lilt Pbtk a m# LP9 Lyre LM LPW LWT LPeT Lf B Lpf Pftt OT .ce 1619 LT 1641 JILT LOW `lt<t2 lilt Ls 490 LT Plot LOT PW JELT fall? gill fill €99t R#ht 1006% We ftf1 "if ARC Lpt NOT An Lf T LPT LFT Of LpT #11I JRLVT '*iw61 JRLiPT Jl�t.pFt r JRt.trs Afwertisiag. me 4411-811l1: NIscutARton Wrote 1sdi1 Advsrtisill# Serviced Rleeptiet o" pheescppiy Services #ill JIM Mseevee aaf As/ Collegian Camineciol phese#tapRp Art. ant Graphics $411 AK A/begete. #ntsaitnl and lsaleslcel Gaedeas Rioialectisg a" taterei"616e Setwices 6911 LF1 Noncommercial tf*colieael. Sciessilic. and Monks rod leaiotasasce Services tis Rrrllleda ReaNfth Og#NI/NiMa ` a" osier R.iliiats. WC Am in Serviced. NEC Reaeecch aed Senlopevat Ldhaealetits fto1*Iiaio%i4 Lat►ageteelas Camortcial Tootiag Lobtotories ford totiasuishet Ckor#ia# Services passenger Car Rental sod Leasing$ elthaet Drivers Trecto Rental end Leasing. eltlksot drivers otili/p Trailer ono Raccestienol tohicle "seal lop oaf &At Repair Sups. Avteeseive ;. tits Ra/gdsfing sap Repair Shyd. Aelenotive taint Shops. Autasosiwe Gtatrol Avlendtive Repair Shp* - Avtori/ie* Repait a". WC -; gad/e L Ttltviaisa Rtpait SRe►s Rafgisaraeiaa A Ais Coafitiesial•Service • Repair shape tlectritst A t/aceseele Repair Shape. WC 489c►. Cloth. sap Jrrsltp Repair . RwaaMelsteep inf Furniture Rtpait r Matfias Repair •---- ipecta/tp lisepseold. **cope popchiattis Rkfiest Leinratoriea beam/ Lnhorelaeieo 6610st one Cote lrwcilftlee E1N-#2$1 � tRYEATlseAL SlRrIC[S N[C.• "I elsealwie elosii/its tiveretorp see Seceafdep Schne/a Celleera. MalwerdititO. feoledsiana/ Schnaps, ` a" Jveior Collegrd >taroeian�t 54heala. *Scope Ooce/ioael Milli Sehasie, Ric Srhwole "a t,wcaeiawel Serviced. WC Job $e*raeat a" v sslisnol Rehobiliessiaa Servigrs ,► part el**.AErav lsssiliri ., :.: .. 1 0 p IkE00�1�f11 SRCIrS . Acacia cyo"Olftloa& lbsseA aceelil Clore$ Paradlst& Ioolaosole Temple$ Acacia foraostaas.lsaeal scociss Citrus raticalats& ININNao1e Tomplol Ackros tspts ISOW11121 Coast* roses Mock *Pole! • AcoefarrfesPks er/okftE IPwrotls Palo, Cape $$bat Palo) Coccolode dlvorelloile f/•Igeon piano '! Arecestreee ronsarofllsw& l0eese plot foccolobe grsadiolors Ie19 lost see grape! Awice"Is govelNaas !Black New"g) Coccolobs wifere fSes grpol Sresselo ectlsopkylla ISc60101erel Coccotbrinse arpooste Iflorlde slower palms %elds buceris• Mack ollv*i Cocklesperws vitlffollw 19ottercop fr«/ Doter& slo&robs IGv*o / hbol Cocos sacltere "way Pew&& fuel Pon coconut pail a !ells capitol& Mato Pals) tonocerpos oracles /0rttopwooil 10 Callfawdrs keeestoc cols fllsad"peoll Cosoeorpas arectes •se►Ices' ISllwer beffe no i C611l516mow rigldes& !Erect Wtlebre$A/ Cordle sebasteas IGelgw troel CelOfsleewn sPP.& ISo141Nraskl OaIoNIX roof*& Ibyal Poloclanal Coaelle afelferaNe Ilfild clNNawMI OryPelos leterlflore /Golass Plewl toss$& 1151e1e6 IGOI&M shovers friabotrys japowlce& Rogw/l Coles Powtawdrs ICslbas frytblas criste-2411119 ICoCksPer coral -creel 17kawetdoree sore. (tbase#oid pop") Fogoaie sallloros Ile►ita stoppers! Ckaaae ups hanolils& fruro"as too 0,0141 rogesle confuse liked stoffers/ ID --1 Ckarlsos spocloss (Floss silk tress fe"Ol* toeolde ISPaNISk stoppers! w Mysalldoc&rf„es I&fescens& fAroco ale P ttsdaoester Palo! ilces clfrololls Ishort lost logo CArysophyll&e olive/ors ISatiNtootl Grevlilos banks$$ Wanks grovlilo&t r " . � F` fi to ut &felt awf f /oi t.v ikty I /sal � 1 �...,........ :.: ... .;... ..- ..._ .... ... ............. .:.-. .,...,. _... .. _ .. _ _ _. _ . ,. ,.. _. ..:,,. .. ...,:,,. it'd dt'`Kw.rve�^-u. a...�_. Cb 6 "111N roNsis ISM so$ piwrlo $*.a Iire"lpenll Very large tree, wet for residential tins. ' Nslsctass psicMerrlse IOrar/ poloclowes. '. 60e6Ksw seKtss 11i�+ar-r1/N1 106e002so 14 serOewtll IrearIN clwrs Oelwl Ilex Casson@ leshoos horllrl ►ivcMospersi slows iseetrolwle palm) lKrswde Kr111ollef UKersodsl PIVC osparmo wecerUwrll INecQrthsr pew Jsafperss siellcicota ISostMsrm red csdarl pwress w1r9lalse ltlrs oeMl KrusloMwdrow forroom Mack Ormnemoo MIIopMors sown• Me sewarel toserslraoals iadlcas IOrep-Ilrrtlol "to w& nests 1110re1 polo) topeace/ris regasase 111hito aswpropol "too" roses tGies ravel palm) Llcerls trisadra Mott Ilcsrlef • Saba$ palmetto IGNsga pa/N t/costa ,rswdiss UlCoolla pslmi Serense ropeas ISoo palmetto) ticsais spp.s Iticsals petal ShWora I Isrce /reredise treat tystlama laksaoasts !Meld towlsdl Solotemis asMogesl lobs# Ndoes mehogesvl tYsllame latisllgwa guise iswarlod/ UbAsls argesteas Itroo of 9041 - Mewettre bass owsis !wild MITE Tsb*sls pollides (peak trogat treat Mesllchodoodrow /oetldissimsa IIlestIc1 Tsarladss Indices Ilndis Tswerladi Wass Mvbridss Illeaswal Tsrmisalts coloppe 11roplcat slsondl Mlrics Ceriters Mothers sew muirloa) v Tawodlss Mwessl . Acelyphe hisplAa® 10Mallls pleat) WaemNa v�scosw •mow w�sw •ww.. -. - - - ' IIa.Ateys ea111cA11 IPI"b ball) Ac4011048 elibeslsas• Icopprl"tl Ereathemla alarvo WO 011ea saps) Alocesis W. Iflaptmsnt owl Eerala wlllrls I0I16 stopped Alpials W. Isbell flower) topa"1a confess hied brryl Avon/� IiarC4 pleyarl _ faunal• t08/148 ISpenlsh stopper) Arflsto Craaate lCRriet.as berry) Pests - furale arrtoldes ISpealsh stopped . Asperws spp. IAspory,ro trw/ prasflra opato Ifforlde privet) MpRla spp.• )ilea bepawisl wrMnlp jasalnolNs• Wordealal lesecar"es rocrrests 1 •tails Ire � eca for le1 tl 1 6oepolmrllias app. /lo movi llaal /)email• patens IScarlo/bysh, Ilrebsshl iAor"a N AI csronarlre Ilattrliy Illlyl lb* home Dressale actinopbyfl• IScAattlra/ IlelrcAlaet /lww Ifolloe IIIIp1 Itrosoahea leeks Itecustbrryl Ilelycbiara laro"erlaaw MAJORtlllyl Callom&& heuatocepAele IpbNerpelfl IleticAira •M• 161ager Illlyl Coillcarpo amen/ceps IIUNWICan boeatyb"At_ � C tlalla"tbes Illblltls Ileach Sumoloerl Cwpsts radicans• 41rum at viaal ose-sl"sls• INlblscasl - Nlblaces ran Casale eM.• IGssfal tl�aaocsllls INlfolla• ISplpar Illlyt Csssls IhM�arsls• IGssisl flow !lira• IWllberryl CArrsobalerws Icsco ICocaplenl lien voeltorio "ease IOaarl yaepon belly) C{Nisei liaeeprassl tpareoea SM. I"Walaq,lorles, railroad vlael Coiiaavo vartegal„ie• IGolonl ` Iva Irecteasce"s OWS% older) CaRRcarpas arectvS 16reen battonwo/t Iva Imbricate ISoacoest marsh elderl low t:aRotsrpvs era[lat se!ricers ISl/vet ►el/a"aadl Jacgr!"la beYeasls IJoeva.Al xi vivo _ n u wMdl• arlesta I1landle. IMolte Iodide berryl Asysosls septestrloaalls IOsrllap plus) &*###awl* IArrerloe"I _ lillldae •IparepwlM/ � ` !Nr aw Juelperrs clolsmals colvaserlaW /balwel lualperms coeterlse IShW@ jualps I Lapsrslrosele ledlces /Crape-81rrHo1 is otawe depress• IDWIWI lenteae) ►oatewe sonferldeaols /Oran Iselane/ llp�astrua spp.p 6pr/w// Posts. tlrlepe sescar/e Ill)/y towel Nrrc/safAes fraprsas I"eds, stopper$ Myaclewle caellfta'ee IJe�otlesila/ tirrlce cerlfers tSoolUarn OW mote•. 11e0errll . Nsprolepls IAasfaslarsls Ift%taR feral 0 Oplolopop m Japaeicuse /Dodo lrsssl aeperoala abluS116110, /leparoMlat ftfres rotabillss /QWaea•s Wreath) pRaeaaewla speclosee flarelo SloWl ftIlodendre8 spp.e fC1111ew, 14110 sndrua) f"iaas elllotlos variety dense Made county plat) l�lthecelllna pWedslWpeasse /Olecsb*Wl A• Du00n+ AI ose lmo:ovhon +s 1• K 2nd Avenue and SE 3rd S+roe+ Adjust Goat curb on public Iand on southbound - 4 approach and adjus+ traffic signal heads as required. ♦O cree+o four versus presen+ three southbound through lanes. Leno drop +o be east l y accommoodsted "- south of Interseetlon within exis+ing pevwon+ through left turn at Biscayne Boulaverd Way prior +O BrlckelI Avenue brlogo approach. edify signing and '-a striping throughout soctlon a required. 2. Sir 2nd Avenue and SE 2nd Shroe+ Adjust channel Ise+ton curbing in southeast corner to provide +wa wes+bound through lanes and +nree sopers+s left turn taros, plus one free tier left turn lane inside wodified channeliss+ion Island. Two of the loft turn lanes for access +0 1-99 en+rsnce reap Mar SE 3ro Avenue and SE 3rd S+roe+• one •anda*ory and one optlesnol. Adjus+oen+ of channelise+ion Island In sou+%oos+ corner +o of a* at low throe soot'ibound +hr".-% I ones. +rsnsitloned +hrough ln+ersoctlon wl+h skip guide 11Ms. (fto mandatory rfgh+ turn lane end +wo through l ones currue+6 y to pf see.) llertso signal head displays, pales+rlan ffe#ures. hl Overhead and other signing* and Won + wankings,as requ I red . t 104_ a a i -;. Yyr y S. 611eeyn• Plate 'ro3ect En♦rance Entrance and exit drives to be coordinated wlto ultiwate bifurcated ronp design and City of 141aml Public Works Oepsrtwent. Aaonetric alterations at project drives near Blscayno Boulevard fray and BI scayne Boulevard May. This Is to Include revised drainage as necessary, outside oavawent widening wlthin exlsting right of way, slgnelisation of each drive to be installed when wrrar+ted, and revised psvewent markings• Also • provide custom material and construction for approximately 1,200 feet of sidewalks along project - street frontage and rlverwaik frontageo and all seating, lighting, and landscaping@ all for public . ! use • - Y d ,1. Biscayne Boulevard Way Access Roadway City to preserve present public right of way for saparate 18, eastbound access roadway soutw of Biscayne Boulevard Wray to extend from S€ 3rd Avenue to Biscayne plaza project south vehicular traffic entrance. preservwtlon to e0end at leas♦ to dote of cowpietlon of project Phase, i. (Uparste access roadway not domed necessary to project phase 1.)hEr p,s¢i T b. Surrounding Area Improvenants (00SIde Cupont PI ass) 1: SE 2nd Street betveen Sov+n Miami Avenue and SE 18t Avenue Avenue Mister roadway plan calls for three +ravel lanes } wlthin this $action of SE 2nd Street, to be. Constructed wlthin existing public right of way. "r Q AY, 7 00410 1 T 5 'PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND PMA S I NG Off ilcoo Comore I a I .(Sq. F.)Ho+el (So. F+.) Res I d*m+ 1 a I • Miami con+or 791,000 634 Units %,297 0 Exisflng 6690000 S.F. Biscayne Plaza 7009000 0 160,000 60 Uni+s Phase 1 120t000 S.F. (incl. pod icast) Biscayne Plaza- 780,000 90 Units, 114ass, 2 • If the marks+ is unfavorable residential-,cons+ruc+ion of +h* 190 residential unl+st OO' 000, -641W as offset space the App I Icon+ will construct ,+hQ'jq u SOURCE: ADA T 1 a 0 STATE OF fLOR:r� DZPAft:� . ", OF C0.Mr'N:TV ArrAMS Diva:= of REsouRCE nAhN:NC JM PASA= N. sCRZAL• of LAND AM hATtR UNAMM.NT 2571 Zxecutive Center Circle, East Tallahassee, Florida 32301-1244 (104) 181-4923 EXM181T 6 SLNit-C'•!S scbsectien 380.06(16), Florida Statutes, places the responsibility on the developer of an a,p:oved development c: regional impact (DR:) for submitting an annual report to the local government, the Regional planning Council, the Depa::men: of Community Affairs, and to all affected permit agencies, on :r.t date specified in the Development otde:. The failure of a developer to submit the report on the date specified in the development order may result in the temporary suspension of :he development order by the local government until the annual tep::: is submitted to the review agencies. This requirement apg::es to all developments of regional impact which have been approved since August i, 1180. :f you have any questions about t»is required report, call the on: Enforcement Coordinator at, (5::; 418-ells. Please send the original completed annual report to -the designated local goverment official stated in thf dove!*- en: order with (1) copy to each of the following: a) The regional planning agency of Jurisdictions b) All affected.permitting agencies: e) Division of Resource Planning and Manage -en: Sureau of Land and Fate: Management 2371 Executive Center Circle, East Tallahassee, Florida 32302 Please fotuat your Annual Status Report after the format example provided below. ANNUAL STATUS MOST Reporting Period: to Month/Day/Year Month/Say/Peat Developments name of DIU Locations , City County Developer: Raines Company tame Address: Street Location BLUM•07•13 Palo Two _ 1) Describe any changes made in the proposed plan of development, phasing, or in the representations Contained in the Application for Development Approval since the Develope-enz of Regional Impact received approval. Please note any sc%--ons (substantial determinations) taken by local government to ad::ess these changes. )tote: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach as Exhibit •As a detailed desciption of each change and conies c: the modified site plan drawings. Exhibit •A• should also add:ess the following additional Stems if applicable. a) Describe changes in the plan of development or phasic; for the reporting year and for the subsequent years; b) state any known incremental DRY applications to: development approval or requests for a substantial -° deviation determination that were filed in the repo:t:ng year and to be filed during the next year; t e) Attach a copy of any notice of the adoption ofa development order or the subsequent modification of an adopted development order that was recorded by the. developer pursuant to subsection 380.06(14)(d), F.S. 2) gas there been a change in local govvrnment ju:isditti:n for any portion of the development since the development otde: '- was issued? If so, has the annexing local government adopted a now Development of Regional Impact development order tot the project? Please provide a copy of the order adopted by the annexing local government. 11 Provide copies of any revised master plans, inc:sma-tar site plans# ate.# not previously submitted. Motes If a response is to be more than one at two sentences, attach as Exhibit •i.• 0) Provide a au —sty comparison of development activity proposed and actually conducted for the reporting year. �y+ !samples fiber of dwelling units constructed, site improve p Bents, lots sold# acres mined• gross floor area constructed, barrels of storage capacity completed, permits obtained, etc. Motes If a response if to be mote than one sentence, attach as Exhibit *Coo S) lave any undeveloped tracts of land in the development (other than individual aingle•faseily lots) been sold to p tp sarate entity of ouvolopet? If so* identify tract, its sine, and the buyer. Prase provide maps which show the tracts Involved. I'tact Ruyet !totes If a response is to be snore than one sentence, attaci as Exhibit "D.` d) Describe any lands purchased at optioned adjsce" mu the original Development of regional Impact site subsequent to issuance of the development order. Identify such ISM* its ei.e, and latendett use an a site plats and map. notes If a rtapause is to be wore than one sentence, aqt CW as Exhibit or.* r t �. ri ti • u�+n-o�-es . rage :brae 7) List any substantial local, state, and fedora: pe:-:;s which have been obtained, applied fort as denied, dus:n; t::a reporting pes:od. 1peci:y tae agency, type of permit, and d;;; got each. Rater Sf a response is to be acre, than alto sentence, AZZA:h as zabluz a i) Assess the development's and local govemme-.t's ear.- tinuing c*mpliance vitt any conditions of approval Contained in tao CAS development order. 0- qw-..�ok. w•.s Ma �h � ® 4� _ ilw�•�.se, • S tee. , ' • ws® _ 'f e..w z f'.e ~ ��♦+•3•: 2-. 'F•+e .ti a .. NK• ., : A.; M. EXHIBIT „o„ The a t�ir•*development _ site, consisting of Miami Center Existting and 51,scayne Plaza (as proposed) is described as follows: • Y Tract "D," DU PONT PLAZA, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 50 at Page 11 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Begin at a point 25.00 feet South of the Monument Line of Southeast 2nd Street extended Easterly and 1067.24 feet East of the Monument Line of Southeast 2nd Avenue and run East, parallel to and 25.00 feet South of the Monument Line of Southeast 2nd Street extended for 645.94 feet; thence South 0 degrees 04 minutes 07 seconds East for 352.27 feet to a Point of Curvatures thence Southwesterly along - a circular curve to the right, having a radius of 65.16 feet and a central angle of 71 degrees 02 minutes 59 seconds, for an arc distance of $0.80 feet to a Point of Tangency; thence South 70 degrees 58 minutes 52 seconds West for 73.53 foots thence South 70 degrees 58 minutes 36 seconds West for 744.58 feet (last mentioned five courses being coincident with the boundary Y" of the afore- mentioned plat of DU PONT PLAZA; thence North (radial to the next described curve) for 34.61 foots thence Northeasterly and Northerly along a circular curve to the left having a radius of 212.50 feet and a central angle of 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds for an arc distance of 176.715 feet to a Point of Tangencys thence North for 377.00 feet to a Point of Curvatures thence Northeasterly along a circular curve to the right, having a radius of 300.00 feet and a central angle of 28 degrees 34 minutes 00 seconds for an are distance of 149.57 feet to a Point of Compound Curvatures thence Northeasterly along a circular curve to the right, having a radius of 25.00 feet and a central angle of 61 degrees 26 minutes 00 seconds for an are distance of 26.81 feet to the Point of Beginning, lying and being in the City of Miami, Dade County, Florida. 9 F••arre „�.,� :. -' ,'�"'",-°�'"''" fir. • : �+�... "4"'"'R "'�'A +�• , y _ 114ON . , •l of ; 4••�i' t f. _ • . - • w ..� EXHIBIT "E" That portion of the property containing Miami Center Existing is described as follows: Being that portion of Tract D. Block 1, 'duPont Plaza," according to plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 50 at page 11, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Begin at the Northeast corner of said Tract D and ' run West along the North line of Tract D for 645.94 feet to a Point of Curvature; thence Southwesterly along a, circular curve to the left having a radius of 25.00 iaet and a .., ntt"i angle of 61 degrees 26 minutes 00 seconds for an arc distance of 26.81 feet to a Point of Compound Curvatures thence Southerly along a circular curve to the left having a radius of 300.00 feet and a central angle of 28 degrees 34 minutes 00 seconds for an arc distance of 149.57 feet to a Point of Tangency; thence South for 293.50 feet (said last mentioned four courses being coincident with the boundary lines of said Tract D); thence East for 179.41 feet; thence North for 150.00 feet; thence East for 5225.36 feet; thence North 0 degrees 04 minutes 07 seconds West along the East line of said Tract D for 300.00 feet to .tde Point of Beginning, lying and being in the City of Miami, Dade County, Florida. ,5��,, as e• .�•T a, i -.. .�..'- � �4`t �. �'vn�� .. ^eF+^:�. � ..� wt. • �' •u+..:� • e�:......tr� ram- �.�a•��� —•�••,.,..,...,..�.�s.r•.:+..ar.. %:.��.��..:. .�,..r:' a .•.+t�+e•' a :I3r`. •____ =T: fir:. w� : �. � � ' EX4191T "F" That portion of the property containing Biscayne Plaza, as proposed, is described as follows: Being that portion of Tract D, Block 1, °du Pont Plaza"e according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 50 at Page 11 of the Public Records of Dade County. Florida, more particularly described as follows: ,Commence at the Northeast corner of said Tract •D• and run South 0 degrees 04 minutes 07 seconds East, along the East line of said Tract *DO# for 300.00 feet to the Point of Beginning of the parcel hereinafter described: thence continue South 0 degrees 04 minutes 07 seconds East along the East line of said Tract 'D" for 52.27 f eet to a Point of Curvature; thence Southwesterly along a circular curve to the right having a radius of 65.16 feet and a central angle of 71 degrees 02 minutes 59 seconds for an arc distance of 80.80 feet to a Point of Tangency; thence South 70 degrees 58 minutes 52 seconds West for 73.53 feet; thence South 70 degrees 58 minutes 36 seconds West for 626.56 feet; (said last mentioned five courses being coincident with the boundary lines of said Tract "D") thence North along the Easterly Right -of -Way line of Biscayne Boulevard and its Southerly prolongation for 191.81 feet; thence East for 179.41 feet; thence North for 150.00 feet; thence East for 525.36 feet to the Point of Beginning, lying and being In the City of Miami, Dade County, Florida. M TER DEVELOPMENf PLAN i s w � i fy J FIGURE t p � t3 yr r f j� ss• t SWRCF- ADA A-1 s FIGURE 4 ' v►•�'t'e ra e Sggf',Lt+ �'� r^�,s` r. '• a �f • '�p • %•°'�� • .• •mot .e ".r • r .. • b ' r.�•w'••2,•�`Z^ ..4c: ,�va•�+::• r : �Aj :;%4"; '<�•`�...@ •• ` •,P.•. .ems ' .. ••A• J,.••,r.+ w - .T• + • r,.i:: . fit' •' • - ~+.,.,,• •' • '� ,,, •` ' ♦ . t • ♦ a •y .. t• • ,•' ,w tea. • coc0000000 :. • omocimodQQv •.r� .. • esoeoeddddo 000aooeodd -• • + .. rsvovddooda Qvovoodoav •00®OQBOOOO � . OOOOOQOooO - ommrsQonmdm .. •' • oas=eim®om®m ora�48 W.0 ® ` �. • mcae®tsframOoo •• :• �• OmOrOQOddo ®Oti•AQfiOQQO � t• OOQOQ00000 .•ff� �' •" '�• _ ." QOOOdOOddd •. •. • .. • + 4=O4o®®00000 OIOOYOOOimO �- •+� a - - Ml.ralf •' dmdOQQOOQQ . •• ' - IL7PJ000OIpO0i0 04 .r a m"==YOOOiO • •' • MPH Od OOQOIOO'QO . . ' _ � - •. - OOaim�Y0i0000 .. OOOOOQOOQC w`• OOOOOiOQ00 __mm.__®®mGPM '.•! �• ' •'a•f .. • • MASTER SITE E P L A .. . w ' `i.��;. ''� ., , s• x•:.», :. ISCAYNE P�+l•.AFA - . ..,:, ataL• a • ..}:r.: •.6•".-.lt w . sr•w• :r,r 'aiti'.•ir' .r n� .+''�'• . s". � ... FIGURE 3 BISCAYNE PLAZA A SOUTH ELEVATION n t t { F tw'w M FIGU RE 4- CLff EM FWT E)r=SiGN FOR TM PZ DOVMOM Diff-H79JUAT 0.4+7 S%,4',tf-tv = 'Ifu F1,01 -=,, Rm- % =1,11 -1) 71 ....,........•.. •• •o seen. so. 41 if /f I 1 Mor 1 r l i Ilf���i � � � I _ •� 1 .f n•wam CE~ j Li till ,f .. ofCii..�—` .�►;�, �1\ It% 1 •�� a�aa\ lr i � � .: � 1 � � I moms 4 \� O w•e•a ww•+• waw - ��� 1 � .Ills • l� \� �_.� _ �• �, , • tr��� �-: ` ice=Arm._ l.• � -ice`-- Y•- 111 INeca.•a aawuvww wag kRR`•��!,!! t aAs dllgw•1 slow Li Mow O••e •4•w•illalm ate• 9AAFMOM&MV at so .•C.•/ ••• "•Caws •o•404M w.. ISTMO a 9 ,yam '�.+ *11�pa�hu+r�f11taS.yltu/ES•tK !,r =:• -.� WH11'U;dOQI1vY111[IY1rg0E�TlM'MFNtAl11�IMN1fAl11lYf41lYE � � - ` .. ., 1AIIr/ll -!.E )!•f � 51�111�114M1+AIM:.MMIII P' "A 57LWS i� 1 oa•.vinoriN �fvallr'�In wlo«w.*•r ..a m- . a . ej vel e",r)It,t ,,�, •!r ( 6,f; t;- r,t� ,�, �:- Aid' - 3 A' i_ IPAV I P5 A A d J F fil th 1+ eemd) tt Z 4 4 colt 4444, lot al 19, ill All /C v eo O� rA I .0 NIEL) 46-00 177 I I IIII II IIIIII II.I in! lull IIIIIII I In. Ilil•I. , I _ I _ .. "' - -- - -. ... iii r.ii IIII.1111.1 •.III I . I III I111111111. I IIII II I I — III i , ..- ,. _.. , _ ._ �1 i. w[CMKIOEO SRCItS I s t�•os Acacia etsaopntllM IfbaN► •Cates/ IN Citrus Wsdlsl• 1Nlonool• 1sa01o1 _ Acacia foraeslans /Sws•t sc•C1o1 Citrus raticol•ts• INlasapls tsa�pl Aclary a•po4• IS•ps/lllsl Closes roses fritch apple/ 1 AC08190'rAoAAlo wrookell 1►sorofl• psl�, Coo goes Mil CoccoloA9 allwrs/lolls I!lapew plow) r. Ar•costnn rassatoetisnos• IOsass palm) Caccslols 'raNlflsra mig lost son gropes .. Arlceaals pr*la•as Iflach mMgrsa►s1 CaccoloAs oarflare 1309 grail•! Orsss•1• scflaoAAt11• ISt6s/fiscal CW=tbrlaaer arpOtato fflor1As slla►ar ®•1�1 f!'nclds Aoc•res• Iolacla •Ilwl toclalosporsan arlfllloIlan loottorcop frees Sarsera sluru�a 16aryo Ilysl Cocas aoc//•rs salt Asa•• 1Ns E 'sa Cscawst palms Nutl• cosit•t• Iplads palms �'loaocsrprs srettss 1®ottsraeooA' • . 9 W I ND&@ Aaeostoc"hols Ifbwatsr f /1 N Coaocarpos sracfals •a•rIc••• ISIIVW 1otlasaooAl C•Ills!•aoa rlgla/ose IErsct bottle O&I Caries •sins/s1a /G•Igsr tr•sl alllsts•w" $pp.• 11lottleiro9Al 100oala rages• dlbgal polocla"el C0,010118 winters"• lllllf tloaawoa! Orfpstss iotarlllora dl:olaas plow/AdbL �d C•ssle fistulae IGoeNn slw.•rl trloiotr®s japorllcs® dl,o�os41 ales NatanAro lalisl trrteilaas erist"Illl• ldocsspor cersl•trsol 3 CAsaa•brss spp. IlboseAolA Pslmsl tsgsole smillarls•111its stopperss CAsoas►ops Mnlllls• IEarrope•a IM mot togsae , coaeosa ell•® stopporsl � Clwrlsls ""lose Ifloss 9116 frees Impale fosol/a 1SpealsA stopporss � C/u•tsallbcsrpus lutescons• IArece illy Master Nlml lips tH►11o11s 1SAort 1••1 /1'1 Z tsoMtllara 611v11o►wa ISatlal••f: 1 Groarlllas isnlasll ff *s gro•Illool -NN1 Citrus a•raatleollae Iatet Ilaal �. r 1 i - II Cralilu ►*asfp 1$Ipo NA/ Warr large fees, mot for r•slNmtid Wis. ' Goalocan sanctum /tlgnms-altaal flew cossiao 100how below$ - Jacweade scatilallop IJecrsoda$ Jonoperss 0#11cicole tsoot%arm red taderl QeglOdeafr•m Iwrow folKh tr•• iods lyerstroaete Indic** (Crap-Mortlel togaaeelaria regsmos• 111hfte mamgr eel ticrie trisnd►e /halt ticrlef liceale groadise Iticeel• plml ticuole spp.o lllcests point > tysllee• bekm"sis iMlig fowl"$ 04 tysoo me 18119114M ovoid tawleil stanot%we •e%emaosls ovoid 41111$ slsstle%odeadrow fwlldlsstow I1f elfc$ sbss %ylrrldsa loseaael loyriea earlier* ISout%erm won myrfl•f Per%lasowie acelestas tJeratsiM t1 wrai shwas hltaptOram I%e.nea I101100 pieclatl Plant clause Isaad plant pions e1110ttt Isles% vines Plans atAlaNl war. cwl%ee I" mash piM/ rysetp ptscipalew finale* dogwood) , rssonle lo"Itatla totally) piamri•.spp.e lhaagipall llsiwelae• NIC•wrNa tggrf plmcla•$ Psoedop%oamlm srrentll Iffrlds c%rrg pie/ Ptycessperma wega ii Istafratal• Pam Mychospnme mecrllwrlf I1Uctlrt%er plea! Oweas sirgim/n• Itiso 001 11%is•p%or• eaagl• toted engraves "Stooge slots I11sym1 Palms "foam* regts /C*a royal Palo$ Sabel palmetto ICessago Pale$ seraoo ropeas $s.a palmetto$ $Iowa** glaac• 1parafise trees selotemle sm%ogai quest ladles map oll UY*elo rpotoof $Ira* of golfs 1aY*ais Palildaa 4113m% trampof frsel tamrlades Iadlcea /iadta 'tawlads Tamlaosto cetappe $Iroplcoo almands 1e4641am Cypress) T%espsle pOPala•aa WR"Is tree. toasld@.ia% N throe" morrisil owls thatch patos Woman prufllwe olhatch Palo$ thrower radiate fylwide thatch Palms t%rooa■ sfpp• Match peon► Itaf%ingtor rc0usts 4900409te4 paint kly: laotic spKirs fi . LIM �I Sbrwbs. woaes. 04 1)►oead cowers Castes W. ISgorN hall @IsgstMc* bertb*Mea* !raise erNIN Ac01YMe bisllds• ICMwlts* plant) @Odonew* viscose, frerafsb leafl AC*11008 rilhos/saM YC*ppe►led$ 000610 eel/lcblo 1100b bel/l At«else, spp. IEI*gba*t eerf Era■ebsas aervaswas Me* S"" Aloe*s* so. Isbell fleet i Ew�*aod Oalflorls Mile stoppers AasalaN Itorcb glows f""Is console filed barry) Ardoslo Cre,0et0 IClrlsssn brrlo IVWIO tootld* 13ga*Isb sfapp*rl Mses f"Oola "resides 131a*isb stalgerl Alowles !pp. 1Asger@a farts rorostiore SW"sts Marida rrl"tO @"tale spp.a fA*i 6l04l*1 Cardeals J6181*004*26 IG*rdsala/ @*weer*** ►«erwta Irbal-falls Iwagora discolor /31e1I11 s► @wq�wslllaa epp. III.- *vHiss) Neeelle totems IScerletbasb. 11rebesbs O . @re!lale, actl000111a ficbeffleral t4llcbsaa Coronaries etiuttertlg /t111/ @lrososle* 1ecUa fl«*seberrll tled"blus foal 1741lw 311171 Colllondre basivt«gMl* Qbewrllotte a IiNweblus garoaerteae* Iltoblls Allow$ - CNNtKp esKfc*ae, iAsKIcM be,eatl0aebl Ibd lam . 161 1111 � � �' 71 Cwysb rodica*sv otroyN via*$ lWooatbes dlbillis f@lecb swallowers Cnf10 epp.a Icesetet ollb/aces rowsfa**elss fulbolcess Collie dabowsote !Ccsslot oyeaaocal/ls Istifellse ISMIdK little Cbrgsobeteaes Ic«o ICocglael Ilea @lwss IQsllbrrls *idler IS*esraSsl Iota vas/tar/* name lower# gapes "logo Cod/aeuw wKiegat•rw• ICrotawl fpcome W. llkrel*g glorlot. retire" some# 1 Coiwcaryus erec)us /Greer butooewotel • ewe Irectenscans IWO elder) 1 ConocMses MKte! serious Isiower beteaaw0adi Iva IM►Y9tdew /Sterol*+ verse elMrf Jlett�tla/* ltgMlf! fbtwmo+/ II I' Jefrop" srIt111de lower loss ti< . iesl�srw dlMssls glaoraw/s• 1lwl�s►sl ' Jenlssrss conforts• ISlawe Jwl/sr/ Ls�arstres�ale Indles• forepe-/lrrtlel tMtMa dprNss tower@ tentenet 1Mtfte Matevidessls to w# IW") llw%from sM.a Iftivell Posts. tie'Joe moscers• 11.1111 tafrll itrrclawtliss froVems ISlerlsoll st"WI lyrclsrls cwllllors• fJNstica"I Mfrlcs censers fSontlaers aaee farrtls, abo rrys > sp�rolpls bosfoMersls feast n ferhl 1 p OtsloloSos japealcus• llbods gaol lydsrosls dhlsitolls lhrerelalsl Petros volaasllls• IQwes•s wreaths s 1%01 ,er i s s/.c lose• 1 Terch Vows f+laliodeedros $//.• Icellow, Mllodssdrsol Pines Sol1ottee variety "ago IOsN axssty dlMl . PitMcelSlua quadeowense• felackbesdl Pluwls s//. Itrenyl/amil Podoca►/us $//•• IPodocar/esl fbltskles Oe1Ma►lena` lealfow wellel Ponled•ris Mc►erel•eedl Psycho/rle •ervose mild coffee$ • E,. w. aim- - kwoo snlests t1NM1es alto Mdlsn 6W11- IlsTaaosls ssptMt►layl is Worlla g sitvm$ Sglttsrls tdrrsdiews Scsevels ®$uaforl f l~rrl Scle"M /eairusal Sophore toaaentose 1110l18ce pol Ste"foila n stens• ITsllor elders Saar 1 ea» our f A is seat cad•r s Tscawso coltansls /cape sonsys0*101 Toadies Ict/ress$ lscwarls ctpeasls Ica" ba"Isrc1,161 Tatrottele ®Ico/or ITetrattels, Hest IndIM 111e1 TAuasarois arecta• Map - ffantlel T6anser®ls W.• Mock vines TOtrallls Slows 11latrs1319$ Trsclastog,pWW , JOWIaaeldaS• lfientadersts jssslnst Unless panlcalste ISas sefst rl®urnam susponswe USWW A ve vibormlal vocce steytasnt lye! f splasioss yoccsl roofs florldans, 46Mtoo) leaallas•tla/s Iowa 11111d Rases UVI • enolla: $Oats@$ Sowcaa S=s� Il �� 1 ... r � t.•• ° 1lQLi'•*'tt tGt�S 1tUN t;(q��rANY ..: '° ° • • , 16 AelAM1, It OR10A 33131 * • .., °, 1 .. a Ia0f1 a71•�at41 �,,„ °��. C►!et �•'• � i.. of7A'e7.�a11-i•eVr _ .. • • ..Julx.�,.l9si .� H O LYWE LL .. • . .. . , 1 _ ASc. Howard Gary - . .. " • • ' �';;: = ' , • •• City Manager � .. ••'...:..»,.. • .• :_ •:.. �••, � CITY OF MIAMi ' ' - • /o .::: , 3300 Pan American Drive . _..�•.:: • : '•', . ..• •. : w•,-•-° , �+ i"°1 • Miami Florida 33133 _ _ Dear Mr. Caryl L ''.:' • •.�'i �. 1 1 ,,• s_ • •.'1t ;•: The Holywcll Construction �dompan;- •and • Mr. • • The®dote 0.. Could : i .("Developer') hereby submit for your cons :aeration the followin4'.proposaV, = for the temporary use of the south -end Sand hell at:ea of Sayfront Park. : '+ ! The City of Miami "Ci: " • ' :•' - _ • " - — y a ( y) bran s to ueveloper tiro exclusive use ' of the ©andshell area of Dayfr•.nt Park as c+i!lined on Exhibit j ..;'A", attached hereto. - • . +... -� 2. Developer agrees that no "batch-ng plant" will be erected on said property, and that the property will be used to park construction • trailers and parkins for the emp!:;.e:s of Deve!oper, its j contractor, sub -contractors, affi fates erld related entities. - 3. The term of this ftreement sluill commence on 3uly 1, 19S1 and enc! on February 28, 1982, both d.:te-t inclusive. } •.' 4. , In consideration thereof, Da:velo-, xr agr^e: to: (a) Pry to the City a monthly sum -if Five Thousc•ad Dollars said sum to be paid to the Trus. .Account established for the Redevelopmenk of Oayfront Park; (b) Pay .ill costs for the demolition and r; cnoval of the existing ' Gandshell; =_- •- ,; : ' - (e) Allow the can tinuetl opera ion of the pai .16rl; lot lo.:ated on _ block 2 of Du1'unt Plaza; (d) Peace the perimeter of :lid nancishcll ag-em and provide • ' _ _ : - security persamicl to pats 11 said area `on a full-time, 24• — _ • hour -day basis; �Y��irI���JY� I�1►•v'v.;�r��i..:►r♦�tirti:y..�.�i��.ia~•, •r �.+•°►. •if••. �..°, .��= - . •WI • �� r • • •welt I •�• • A� • . r •/e>•. •i•.Ar/Iw..� •ems •ee••�4 3 s c^4.� t w •. _,.- is ` ,•. -. '_. , .. :. - - _. ....u,.........a • A • S. . The Developer further agrees that: (a) No trees will be removed from the Park area except as •• • may be necessary to demolish the Bandshell; _ . . (b) No part of Biscayne Boulevard or Biscayne Boulevard Way e. - - , will be closed to public traffic, except, when necessary, •• • • those portions where ea,senients exist to install or service ' •• ' ,, e••'r•: • ratili. '• y lines, storm sewers, telephone equipment and such '• • ' ' other under -street work as may be necessary from time to • t ,.,.•. • ..• • . time. , •. •.. 6. The City of ,Miami andDeveloper agree to enter Into ' '...•e • negotiations for the funding of a fountain .in ;he �r4Posed •;:.':. '•• • c Noguchi Park. In the event an agreement cannot 06 reached ' �osz regarding the funding ofsaid fountain, Developer cAcees. that, .=- slbsequent to the expiration of the Agreement, "Arrd at the request of the City, it will sod the area described heein. j ! Upon your acceptance of this Agreement, Developer and''City will be • - -'` F bound by the tarrns outlined above, for the term herein specified. tcSincerely ours ' •.• ��: �.; t a. '~ HOLYWC-C LL CVSTRUCTlOV COMPANY ' _ By: r- LL Theodore B. Gould Agreed to and Accepted: ; :g ; _ •City of Miami CITY CLER:; By; •�- 1 oward Gary �1�1 . • �•'.. —City Manacer ' • ���•• . • A-12 .. . • ' .. l 41 g� l A s: iI tj MI.O. i en !! qA 19' �►�1wIRR A. �'tn�t I �' Q�I MIaIw, s'6OAQru� • MAI'�gA iO!•,1* �QREf 20 May 1985 "' ''''- ,• CCJAL Mr. Theodore Gould, General Partner y Miami Center Limited Partnership 300 Miami Center �G►L r%:r;;a,•:�:-~ 100 Chopin Plata Miami., Florida 33131 Dear Ted: The Miami City Commission is presently considering whether or not to proceed with the present plans for the redevelopment of 8ayfront Park. These plans would involve the removal of the - former library building and the.ful'I development of the Noguchi plan. At our last meeting, Commissioners expressed concern over the amount of private funds committed to the redevelopment effort since the funds raised to date fall far short of those needed. In 1982, during an earlier debate over the fate of the former library building, I attempted to indicate to the Commission the scope of private sector commitments to the park redevelopment program. I read into the record your letter of July 20, 1902. which indicated that you were, "prepared to provide the materials and to construct that portion of the Noguchi design adjacent to Chopin Plata at the south end of the park." This commitment was contingent upon the City moving forward with its plan. Your willingness tc assist us in our funding and construction es;',rts, of cour3e, camp after several meetings with the designer and staff who altered their designs several times prior to meeting with your approval. The City has altered its plans for the south end of the park to complement the Miami Center project and we would now like to proceed with implementation. ,i A lot of progress has been made in fundiny 8ayfront hark and we are much closer to our goal of full funding. I need your help now in moving this project forward. Although you have taken no action to date on your offer to assist us with park development, we would hope that you would now come forward to help make this project a reality. The Miami City Commission will hear this matter again on itay 23. Your willingness to honor your commitment would go a long way in helping us realize this crucial project. -A 7 , HOLYWELI, CORPORATION 1'.u. lip ix ii_ 7u l�`trll'l��l►���'i!!�'. Virginia 22916 Q1 -7 125 lh�u'1„tt�.�ill�. �n�utta _''_'.n►1 May 19, 1336 Etnan P. -Minsky, Esq. Shea UOUia ;:• i �sQ'. tar ickell kven je Miami, Florida 3301 Re: Ba;front FarK Cear Etnan: It nas been drought to my attention that the City Planning iDeza: rem:'; ry recominenaa t ions for the Amended Development Application concerning Co.'s proposed Biscayne Plaza project to be developed as the ^nn-ract Furcnaser of the remaindee of the land on Tract D include $1,1-1CO1CCO `o iq-arovements in Sayfront Park. I understand that it has teem holywell Corporation ana I agreed to contribute $1,000.- 0!�^ redevelopment of Bayfront Park. Tnis allegation is false as the correspondence and transcripts of City Commission hearings indi:ates. Holywell's obligation was limited to providing sod f:r t~e tants-,e_ area. It is my recollection tnat in :January, 1983, when-+n:.w?ll Corporation proposed to resod the bandshell area, Mr. Gary sent me a ^ct'A:e specifically instructing Holy«ell to refrain from placing sod in the oanoshell area. The so-called S1,OOO,OOU contrioution does not exist. In .Duly, s.y8�, Holywell offered to provide the materials amy .i construct the portion of the togucni design adjacent to Chopin Plaza as .3 phiiantnropic tax wsjuction proposal, subject to the City of Miami proceeding immediate:;, *;.:nits plans to redevelop Bayfront Park. Four years nave elapses 3r%d conditions have changed. Holywell does not have a neec for tax deductions. Moreover, Holywell does not have an interest in Miami. fn Attachments cc: Russell wirth Sergio Rodriguez Miller Dawkins 'ATTACHMENT 3 CL09 FOR WASTE TYtES COM"ONLY ASSOCIATED WITH EACH SIC Iwe,•e•'v A Waste pesticides S Washing and rinsing solutions containing pesticides C Empty pesticide containers 0 Spent tosaphene solutions or sludges from dipping t Spent pesticide solutions or sludges other than tosaphene from dipping f IDust containing.heavy metals C Washings and rinsing solutions containing heavy metals —S n N wastewater treatment sludges eentaining heavy metals -_ I Waste ink ' r s Ignitable point wastes containing flammable solvents (flash point. lose than 160*T) K Liquid paint wastes containing heavy metals (cadmium, chromium, mercury or lead) L Spent solvents N Still bottoms from the distillation of solvents N filtration residues from dry cleaning operations 0 Cyanide wastes P Strongly acidic or alkaline wastes Q Spent plating wastes R waste ammonia ' : Photographic wastes T Ignitable wastes (flash point less than 1400F) 0 wastewater sludges containing pentachlorophenol, creosote, or . arsenic = V Waste formaldehyde = W Lead -acid batteries x Waste explosives Y waste oil , t .Other A-15 .' c Jeltl�g�ete{Ilnl i �ninrYln.�any.: I �.��wirrwFrr%•........_...._r�rYir�.n��anmi.�rw+�w' �r�r�i .. .. . �.� i..,.lw,..a:ra..ww.•+fir w•.rt -a ., .... .... ....�.. ... ,.. - .. eritnugonii ii . J . LIST Of POTENTIAL MAZAMMS HASTE CENCRATaS NT SIC CODte SK nasee TpPoo Sic Waste Irmo seeeeiNl« Cod• code •11�5-O�f� Ape 1t�tt 1'b1 LT t••/i•is sod *woo %pigs owe sees an Core ties 1196 LT LOWT Class sea Gleason "sob Seel AK Cost" list taco@/t owd Fsw•detiM A of/t AK Tobacco JtLFrT Special Uadc Cealrarlsea- 41M 401411 AK ABC Sweet cite" Vegetable evil Mtees Peewee 3932-39"! 3L%MWACIUltC 310"TnitS Mot AK seedy Cfe" :ols tee*ned Speci•lales oils, seal ABC AK Coffee feels Cc•teat@ •cwset0nt•1 IlnlicelNts • sweet?hMecls noel tall L%1 Come" sea Caeed fiat► end SoeFo.ds fip Woe ABC Coastal 1`864e. Priestley Crop jail to stood too•*• Iabfic a MG. aloe/ sale ABC sell Cetlle /ee11610 ails all tee•es* Fall teatlei and se•• seeife' •tot AK soa$ tattle. @scope feedlots le.g.0 sa•clusl jail Lai Iletiefe. *ecePt %1*e0,10•* 7*31 Lowness S tope, Long. saes, AK Way, sea Csee Ief•g a!la Lie twig eattc•wfeg solo Baia atiwelwfet Rolls •eel soil AK ABCT Comets$ L1e*alocb Soil /eeperalisw Unices tall toCtrr@lag Iwtt labtic Will$ $sill stet AKT crsy PeNfi.g, telfi@otien, son hetestl« tan Lo am warp two® c eaftts tnittiwg styes. MC slat ooab LPYT Clop sarsestiol. Priestley by Nacltino 3.61 LA fiwisbe•s •1 Srsed atsefu cooing of ce6lw T AT Wweul Crop ftirs C•teee I;i p 310tvicee Raba Let lasisb*te of stood uWas 'laafice of °tat -•lade slfl A Livestock Services. entope Confess for A•ltrl asb9 LM fiber god sift Ii•iat*" @tos IT e•s st geaeabric•. etas -clad• ttb.. tpecielieie• "a Siet step A Laws and Cord*• $*voices sill am moves Carpels sad lots• • et AT 0/8oseslal Shteb gab Tees Services ails IN Twfted carpels aid lows • 1 MI i-abet: IOntSM sill Gala Lis =tit Carpels and :lots. Kc real ltiaab•a Cabinet* ' O� Mai ASC flub@# face• 141% JILT 8814* ed t►*wfel god Y37e0sd Nil AK /•feet Refection g Tres Seed C WI% • talk 7411 Jul JBLT S*d s,/eweTracer and pllwesd liable• seers • Mel AKT t@tr•ceiog Pecegerf service* slit JILT Pttfobeicae*d sorry Daildieess and Caupsw•eet deli N read Fresecei•g _ 1A11-till: CONSTBOCTiss sags sill LIT Jilt" Parlitlobs864 Hood sowsebeld Ntalizo*. sac*yt 100*13111Tel Intl LIVIT sighwy and Secret Coseeteettl•e deed silt s10►/ JBLMT metal sonsobold 71eaileef Need TT end sodis t3biwe914 Ibsa tIrIT stable. Twwacl. sea 18098104 sigMey Csnstntlfon also JEL411 N@waebald losailwre. ABC Illy IT Piwbiwg. Neatiog (*@cap& tl*-tric) led Air deal JBL•IT trend sflicf Izetniaets opal JBLT [swdiliowiw • Palatial. paper sanlisg. and hceretlsg. Beefy alas alai sump JtLsT setaf office astailuet reed pageiaisws sod tearer@s iHl Cowetrdetion. WC sea! HJNeft] steel peoliaiows tad sisleffs LT ?@#ease*. Tile. Neeble. gad Was le track abli LeepfT ►alp sells lilt JBLT floes Lelia$ sad OIAer flsstooeb. SIC able Love# Vapor Mille. lacapt Julldieg aspen •lilts --r- •t•th 1Nostry keo b@es Identllsed •• • S.e*wtill generator of haeardeen was abet abal Lawn lip 1lilas Vapor Codelag and Cta•ias ! 3 ea the bees* 1401 the iodnotte sap gewclnl• coggesive. e*octive. itwstoble. Me 11110 seta. tartpe 3004ile :Jogs logic weetee. Fee tesopee. SIC Cede Orel. sail Propagation Services. abal lip ere -gal rsr*t end P"- shest.d and is a tw�ewei_1 gew•estae of logic peeticede wesees. tech SIC code listed to table 1 has born decwsrwt*1 16414 UP Pressed and +molded s,aap r.00ds . peessawglF to 1Ae Itlerol•ee as • tetra@ ul +6:0 Us, taasreled top— and far.3:ieotJ Ts*drrte, g.aerelwe of hageedows waste. able Upste-uF 4 ortb Fwl/tag®a!� abl; IlV aes4Jaaa9s •R[ - Flee eleenhee• cloosified' - lb]1 M� `wee•peesd and 3waai ass+►@ Jwas, ww 'i m f'�<_. .,, _. ...,... , ,.. ., .. -.... �. � -- i i ,li,q i I+:i I illlllr •'�11:ihil'119�R� rsw.r..rr ur.rrtu n m u i i SK rafee t/p1a NfatflpiiM caM tau eL" semisoft Peed contsinpes 16$$ lip) robot cows. Vobes, brag, awl sidsilet Products 1"s LMTV loslaina Popes Ina luildiwg based Mills foil MILMO Newspapers: Publishing and societies poll NILMO soetiedacols. Publishing a societies Role MILMO looks: Publishing awl societies 3M NILMO lash Printing pose NILMO coeerttial Pclatieg. Ltttetpross dos scfeas lisp 'NILM Commercial lociallog. Lithographic Its) N/Loop ingesaing ant roses, Peieeieg 1154 NILOPO camelcisl Societies. C/atart 1161 MILWQ planetoid lasiseas Vegas lilt NILW4 Creetity Coca hebliebiel loot OILO19 liswlteoko, Losselsat Niobte, tad Neltee lost NILO►O asokbiaaing and 2t141e6 Week tool NILOpO Irpteelliwg logo V Alhslioe awl Chleflee pal• 60" Inarasnic Nemeses site for"n Iadastcial Iwollesit ctowitals. KC Iasi LMT11 Plastics. Materials, spathetic looms, sea Mee-•rlconicable glaseoeeto 1811 LMfl stalbelic lubber loos Lllyl c•ltalasit Man-118I Piters 1114 MY sewebetic Oagssic liters. escape Celleloolf loll biological Produces poll Melicinses and betsslcal• to K L► sohermocestical Ptepstatieea soul rLMR Soap Ina Other letergewts. escape speciallep Cleaners 3841 ALMPTV speciallp cless•re, hllahse, and sonleseian Prepares ions toil PLO" sarlece Actigt Agents. PIwleUlwl Agtaes. saltanslea Otia. and Assistants 311144 FLIT pee/woo. Coserlice. and Other Toilet Preparation* post pCLMV losing and Allied ►lodacts pat,) L%FTl Cum awl Mood Chemicals 346S 1 cyclic Icaal Oar) create, and Relit lottttetdistes. eye*. sea Otgonic pigment• ILokos and losses) paht LIWT► industrial pewit chemicals. Sec loll Niseageners ftesilistes 311 AKLMI Pesticide and Agricultural Ckwlcale. OU Iasi Aabesi•es and Scale*/o 40 loll loplssitta post O'CLMP too too twg In% past L" I: Chemical prtperstlon• loll V tesesltw atoning past l Asphalt tells and C"Iiogo fill •. Lsate.aliag Oslo and Caesee• Ills V teadwels at tesralauo Sea cost. Nl'C polo Jimaltseeltsnewt 11•slic Ire .dvot• list L Lealhre ygtoniwg stool fioroshtng SIC . vast* TWO Mecfipliaa ands • Oslo L . Sots a )bap cue slash a Piedleg-0 I111 L Lao/bee Closes S Mtalpas 1144 L Veen•& fo"Vose. tgcept Alblaioc llal L Lrgsaep 1 loll L somotIa /lsndtags A lorra•s III' L Personal I.e•/roar Cesda loll L 90641ee Ca•dn. M.0 Iasi lot plot Class MI ML lrich Sad 34e0et-etal Clat 7230 Use JeL ceramic Msll and oleos lilt fir Opal SOL Vitreous Chino plumbing 'halters and asesraeors Accessee3ps 3'42 AL Viltooes Chins 'labia and 3ia29oen Acsisla9 l:bl JlL pine Istslanuset 191olatw43.0 Table 4 3634bon Articles IM J1L Porcelsia ilectlical 3091plita I:se JaL soallety Ptsducl%. XC V91 T Abrositt toodmcta I31 Ll Cash@I tackles swd 3e33120.1 3�esices 3/11, 1 glass tuewscts. 34e9.1 Neeers, sod Beijing Villa lug l t.leclra■ttallrrl/csl #701 Ills T Scats trite braweel .sea 3aesl Nail' ,and 394e2 loos _ V cold called Seta) 31sefl ; '31l ip, sad lots spot V Steel ®opt and 'Pubrs 11:1 • 6e41 Item 13vadt its 11212 V 11811486,10 Iran lars3caes Ms s f Slope torndeles, SIC lost V Primer• )®Array sod Aelinissl .al lead Me T proeolt Smr)ltag sad 3p13a3012 sl 23nc vita V sorina/e ttsdreiaan "i linsiaum loll V Primate Sne3atae3 ,rime 2*j3siA2 33 3401371,etl9 1Mlo30. NI[ 11s1 f secanlatl Serllins and 301isana ad 7lawllrta.eeea metals 3141 NL'IMA bellioa. Drawing and 1317vaing .as Coeppet less NLIKNW Alayiww Shoes. Plans and let 1 /lea "in"49 Aiwiaue laltrdrd lcsdatla 31ss NLMOrgo Ale misue Raising .and Vrsuing. Arc l/sa NIl11NOf "11i0s. Drswise seal taltwdieg as A"101e404 Metal. tacept tappet anti Aj##Slto+.m list MMOfQI ,Waning and 3860344e42 a1 fta3.ttlaorg Hart II61 V Alosiwra touwdcies Itaalie99) . 1fA: Y stage. seesaw. Copptt Stood Cegpet lose Allenw twwde its I 1169 .1 Notorious faradties 1CA1334233, ltC Does utwp ? M►lal area 70asaase loll NIIMor" himset arias ttu.ircls, 3113' U1I M1Mir" arlal lase 1+1! NLIMertil Mross Shipping astiril. Dt Nma, 30:21. teal soil 19c..0 50130430tong3 101 Pl dwq fist are r " Mot v Mu/ elst.I elsetttt.0 aeres�tuu° � t ill waste Into Description Cat* 3611 Nltom "sot Sod i/Ae Tools. incept 1Mehlet Toole add Need Save 14116 NlJIDFQT Neal low b low slates H!e NWorQT Norduate. KC H H NLNOFQ Installed Irec and metal iMilatF Ware 1411 "WOO row"ins reelect rallies and Taie lerae$ Cosa0 1' 1411 gloom Ntaties Equipment. accept Electric ant ware Air toreaecee - 3441 NLII M Fabricated Structures Metal 144E Ntoworw Nttal score. lash. tracts. 11oldloss. Coot Tflole 11441 NLIgoFQT Fabricated plate Wert 1446 1111AMT ghost Motet yeah 3446 amp" Asclallectoral and Dra~lal line) verb Has NL1MWW Ff/ta►ricaetd Mete) %iltiess and "Monte Hoe NLIN/FQT Iliocallootone Metal Morb Hsl NWOrQT scree *school Feetocte . Hs1 Nl11oM1T Sales. Note. Screws, liveles sad waahafa kb2 NtMOrw Iron and Steel Fersiase HN WHOIPQT Automotive sesopials Hite NtM M "ties stoepiese. etc 1411 MLI1OFQi tlecueplalies, polishing. ►sating. Anadlalng. _ and Colsfoes 341e NMFQT Conine, tasteviss. and Allied fecelces. KC 3491 stable Armes Ancueit ion 3681 Aatwoitioa. escept ter !cell Arse. KC Y HSe Ordnance dad Accessories. etc �! Ml 1N•1" sloes. Cos. led sydroolic Tnrblosa OD Isle RuvrQT laltteal cw;paflion Retinas. etc IS11 ft"Ur" Fore Machinery sea tguipetal ISIA NWOrQT Coffee Tcectere s Lase A CaftM Eplpatat Fill Ntmi Coaetrviceioe Machinery sad equipment Pill, N11M1►Q1 mining Machiai and Eguipeent. stop) Oil field 1S1! IILrID/gT 011 Viola Machtater awl tgaipetet His NI/NIrQ Converses sad Cowvelies tguipefet 1sDt NL"W'QT Industrial Trucks. Ifsctere. Treileee. and I1A1 NLNOFQT Ilschine tools. Metal Collins IS4T NLMn/QT N.chieo Tools. "case fsrains Out wMrQT special egos Coed Tools. Die Sala. Jive and resource. and lodes/coal Nelda IM vil."l QT Machias Tool Accessories a lle series Deolcoo Ili$ NIMf►a3T Favor Driven Need Iasi$ Ds4e "I fall"" Moles Walking "achiever. KC 1sS1 NIM11►t1T goal Feadvtt. ".chiefs? MI 14101011411 trelile "achiever 1ss1 MtlMltQt Yvoays.4jes N.eAieery # 1ss4 "lovi repro Iedselfifs "eehlnerF Is11 NlrMetpt Iffwtjw$ Tfeara Noehiaory Md E�efipstnt `. Me atwotclr special oedwsllr Meehlefol. PIC t €Ida �+�# t141 MlNutgT poops sod ►uspie$ r/ujptaoni »41 PlfwrlT S.1 I 004 polite asp lose laic • poi tl.ovhttt clesellova sic Code Waste Trove DroctipliM 14111 NL"" II Alt a" its Ceoprtaeuts 1 IUi InV" . •loafoc a" tsheeat I<tesi3stles Fes 110 NLIN" ladnslribl preccaa rufaace a *@"a Ms gK%W" Nreheeicsi roots Trawsnisoiea 3lquilstao. WC 1169 NLN*w Coots.) Indvstrja9 Rathiooey and 1440ape.el. alto ISr! NLMPQ tlactraeic I:en"6e44 14yipatal lot. NL'If►rQ Calonlatiwa 1 Atcavtatiwg Naohieeej, 2241FV9e Electronic Ig•livtarea Isle NL!K" office Marllints. mar lsdl NL`NIFQT CeMteciai Landta. 1M1 Clollning. :3aa rst133 '' machines MIS NLV " Alt Conditioning sad sass Aiv Arco iota '1Auilta..04 Md r.-Macia3 wd jadvstlla3 2t17asreso3a.e tgoiptarel 1SAb New" "@gentle$ and Dispessisg Pero9 side NLVnfQ service 34468117 loacaeasoa. Mac 11e3 Nt"o"v Catb.ceaste. Fistens. Piston Diego 4 "situ Isle NLWFW Nachlnitl. E391p1 13011lis9l. MC 1.11! "I'lli T power. Dislaibvtjwa :red 3potia347 Ifansl.adraves 1411 atwrq soflobssss sea 3olall►boota Aptpsealees 1e81 NLNOFQ motors A 90ec1320/3 14:t NIMOIQ Industrial Can11933 1411 NLe11019 Voldias Apparatus, E3sclh4c 1424 NL'IOFQ careen • Crophilt Pasaocas lbte Kai Rltctfical 3advatti33 Apear31as, INC 141E 1111 Non$ehola selli$fralota 3441 •Cost ,awn rats Freolves 1414 Kau" Rltcotic Nsusovar(ps 304 rani 1416 sm" sovies Machinea 1410 NI."" noneoheld A"liaecil. Tali 1641 2~9 Electric tamps :z+ 1441 NiNOPQ cottest-cacryisa Cori.* soaievs i Hss NLMMQ sasldoolia) 1304j7ic laakliag 1ie,tsr(ps 1446 OIL"" crucial. 344w03lial. .and jnsliaysiseo0 Lishlie$ llstntt3 Hut NL'/OFQ' 'vthiculsr Light in% li*IL W'ml 11S1 NLVnfQ Asdio a Tolevisien 1ec(pov3ang Ic9a lblt Kni Fh000jtaph 3040142 sod Pea-rtc3titd alagnsll,a lapo lNI NUInrO audio and Ttl(pviaise 7720s0411iwg. 33aw4)ins, snJ Dot(pollee 3alui;lmr41 tied L+rpsojiva Ht4 NtMnlq steicsndvctsra swa 3s3at,1m Devac ra K/4 NLNMQ Rltcessaic capsc avers 1411 NLmnrgv tlec/feoic Cei afao39rtstc3, lei) r!-3(p) leqi Ie1e vitlei Q Eloctosnie Caepawfela, sit 14e1 Now slalaso sb134 i(ps 1411 vi rojusy sellorafs. Del and vvt 1111 moist rtheolfa .ea Pasaosg9l tar Uaaos 1114 NtflNW Woof Tobafle "stools and seS?7lDfLi3 � 1116 NLVnrQ Not•f o"..•.•s silo pinions) Aiectatl /r!4 NlfnftyT Aifct.l7 tw$iefe and lnfiA. )ae13 11;A Nt.gael�T i1 At Craft reels enB t.aaa333.j ,'7m4 a1i TlP fare O one srss�aasren•rul Inruun , . � II�rIO�Cir�'" idi�.r nrni.L rCi iMu.r.+w ner•r urY+�s rr'•p .. ._ - - - • MC Gast. two Sic vast• trees Dettnrei« Cole Coae� list NNMitQe Star ilvilaisg sad sepsities Asia T Alt'rrMapttsli«, Certificated coet.3erra sell NUMtPQ1 Sest.swildiq sus mepaitiws isss T Aiopwoo sea alpine yaslds Tall NtIMNQ esgimeetiag. Scion/ific, substages? ad Nfavertll Ns/ LTT Airport T®o®ical rereices s iwNvwaswto G6/J into" Cede Pesrsteoa Viso Lieve • deep sun" Astwtit Comatose lot Mira/slit' Deeldestiol sea 6611 Jatr'rf Defined Posralose P9re Pena Ca*ettcial foviosawnes oed appliesces 4619 l/1.001 Piss Loses, SMi "as NIAOPQ Ieawalrial /watteewwts Not Meeseeies. Sisplay. and 4111 Ll ieAsshoee C..ewascaliew plies or Sao*) Coastal of Prscess Tuieaes. /d Sal/led :N11 LT media mroadva4ling hmaesta r 4e11 LT letevigiM lresarssaias Iepb NLini Q 'relativism plaid Nsters ad comiles Devices 6911 T flottlic sevvires less. IIM" Iulovs>fwts met Measuring ama Testing of Geis T 11es^ties& 6 01 sevoiesa electricity a" electric Signals 4611 T ass 6 sthse bervicea lento 11111011911 INsesoieg and C«ltollleg Devices. KC 4e11 1 Cw6iaolioa sailasits. sic "it HMOPQ Optical Inettvwrot• and Lanes ifla 1 Sewevsse "Jtalema Ida Num" Ssteical sad Nedicll Instrmstegs ed Appefsess 4111 f Nefoge $Igloos Isis NLM " Orlhsredle, Poosebeeles era marmite! Applisseve Gfso AKY SMilsrs $vgeices, SIC sea $spokes 1141 QMPQ SNtel 91sipseat 04 $Miles Slot-$e°!l: WhRL1sAlt nose less NLMI Ophthalmic goods I1161 NLMOPQ Photographic agvigent sad 111miles sell T Scrap 6 Visit Nslot3ais. Veieteselo Dell NN1o/Q Yalcbe. Cloths. ate. $tall LM chemicals and Allied Pladvcle Wholesale soil KNOW Jewtiry. PreciMo Notes His A Tama $applies I914 11W01Po1 Sil elvers. Posted vet•. sad Slotstess Steel Oslo aloe JILT paints. Taseishea, 3dri rwrplies lots MngOPQ Jewslet's fieaisgo 6 Nstecials t Lapidary Week HN MJtlltOrQ Coolant Jeweler sea Coolant 111avalties. escape S211-3e4114: MAIL ?Deaf Pteslws Neeel �. I064 NXLNO►Q Morales, Pin. Mods sod eyes, sod Sfielise S:II JILT 110441. glass. sea NalJ:yeper slaves �o Nstiess 3:$1 AIgT Naodware Stares seal slinsts pQ Signs sea Adeertielse Staplers Sall J/LP Molise llsmr lealtrs Ions NRLNDFQ morial coolete %III Allot Seperlasot $sore's 3919 s1RLMO►QfT Nswwlsttsoiwg idvetelee 11N Asset Nircellawtsws cosolal Dersl•msdise Slaves 4011-4ee9: faAMSPOSTA110M AND PUBLIC IRILlttee ssll L/'M "slog voloicle declare 1310e6 6 111e4" "sese w0icle eosaera ISgva fink' Gill JaLTT Rallreade, Lose -Novi Operating $%is Less Sets a amm S•Ppss Siegel Gill LMI Local end Sabarbow Tamest 5$:1 UNT Gasoline Service 33scian's, Be"ail 4011 JSLTT switching 6 Tominal lslabtisMtets MI Lf11"1 loss atalers Gllo Lt+"T Local Passenger ioMsprbtiM. NLC 1,114M Isteecssse sealers Asti Lttlf Tosicabe Scott Lf"i1 adametive ligalora, At 41/1 Lfvf Intercity sad Notes Nighwar Passenger St. t sss•twla Appteswca Serves, levrsis irMsprtetrsw Sell LT Aotaostic Mrstbawai33as alsthawe Isreralote AM LTVr School loses Selo 1 I•ael 6 ace 2043021 • i11? 1 Maistessoce 6 service facilities for ""me leahosle seal I owes 011 I'valess Possessor Ttonspertati« slid T Lieaelied Paaaslove gas lga mals AM JKLM as•i�l LoI Tawittiest Slarage Tal$-a0•l: 3QAarsSaS 7 !Ciss?3 1 " 4111 JNLPYI lrot.iws. fasep/ Local pia 4114 Ja1NT Local ltechiss with Stores* f11S LN Coin pperateA Ls.•aarasa sea cgs l'sesaiwg as•as, !� 4111 J6Pf1 freebies forwi••et Pocilitioe JIM an s.t Closni•p 3aaara awe tlesrro•s j " 6111 4411 istpur 1 S.S. Postal Service IIINelwto.wwc• Sei11 Neer See receive YtMsprtari*w pall tits In tN Castes ••a P 0344s97 /sar.r•o.1 lawA.oura 6461 Msfioe Coss* NIAalias 1161 to*sts! S•asatar sa.i sarwa9asiaa foie Jsty" Volvo Tro•►spertarr•n Services. N[C iota tT f1tlltLi Oe+at.+r.� AA+voaaoaw� S,.sa•ra- tRIC 0Mat eteswAvee classified r�IIE i'' Illllllililll�lldlllliH I �IIL n u ihi II blob ■ennr nWu muusr40rAwm1ilir::niY '11141 all",, 1 u u 1 I rEIB— ! ,«• ::', on MIIPM Is,, i1C Msote two rest/vtia• SIC taste two ptasNvtfs• Celt Code tilt in AdvaHisl•g. AC MI/-itl�1• IgSRLLaMtMM vivo I/t sired Ibis M•ertltleg services •- I)of Lot llGegtiat Sad vhstscagly S•tvicta beep JSLvt MGetu•s and act cafloris• lips tot Co•eveeial ObesesrsOlay, Arc. Ind erotbite tall AK 440c016. 1161461461 a•d somelgital C•rtt•• tap ACM pisiwltsti•i sad tet•r•i•eiie• st1•iee• goal LOt ponte••etcial Edutssiesol. Selamailic. and lug MT Cloasi•s 04 %aiateas•te Services to pGellisse s•stucb i.isnisatia•s and lkh•e Wileassge. INC 611/ Js saevises. WC Ise$ LIT poeesrcb and pevelot•vat Lobersterlte fNs Gr iT Oboleli•ishisg Laboratories Peer Vt Commercial Tesriag Laboratories list Fire talisiuisbet Cbatglag services Ill! L"m ►ooee•eat Car postal ••d Lesriai, eliMst private Isis LMI truck festal and Leasing, without Wages j HH List poility, Steller ass steetotional febble, "*too . isle LOW top sot post 11spaie skein. 101e+•sth• , I'M LW Titer setteadies eat power :.usve. Autea•tivs Isis LM Point Shape. AGtemstivt fill LNT 620e161 Ae imative sepi isle L"M Arte•etive s•Oeie Shops. atf. 1611 VI pasts, • ttlevieles povIf Shops 16)) Vt 11e1rileroties 6 Air Coaditie•iy service 6 ! popir Slays ;, isle LOT ilectsical 6 Electronic sell Steeps, gEt 1611 Lt 1leteb. Clock. sod Jeweler Arreir > 1641 JILT mougholetert sad Turaitett poteir N 1692 LEY reldi•i seteir li p 16e4 LT Ae•NGra seei•dleg Save 16e/ LT . s•Ooir Shape and stlsttd Seriltee. on >_ IisslGli•i Tseider•isisl . tilt LOT services Allied to Molise victors h•dection foil JELL the llicai producer& leacttt "allow vieteree) sod Miecellaa•osa vb•saticai services fell AK Public Gall Caesars step l►I tour-OtttelN Awa•atst ptvlcea , ' feed JILOT Ansaeaeat y,e/ke fete Am A•vs••e*t sad Regresses• Services. 1"tC r Ns! LOT comes/ Medical sad $Greece$ Meeritfala bibs LOT $pciohO "hsOltses, taceOt vafcbisttle der/ LOt Medical Lo►ste/erie• "it LOT pealse Le►eresocive f i LOT Outpotia•1 tote Oscllltles peso-l))1: tNKAT10MAL St•1►IR! '� Sic ` slswMce slMsifieg pipe JILOt elementary, mad Secoodart School• IM JILOT Colleges. Maivetsilito. Orele�ei••al lebsets. sad Juaier Ceilegto • 8249 MLOTV •etetesaal scbeele. enttOt Vocational pig► t $classes, MtC •Die Jpsi ISOMote Gwd tdGcetiMal Serelies. tonic 3 loll SKIT job ttetaeag sad Iletaliaaal INheb l/tatle• Services , li .. 1 .. le .. :;,+'•'`a'� -- MIC-s.�141 fieefl!b•fe t14Ni/.f� . 'I - « M. x E PROPOSED P.ATTACHMENT S. INTERIM TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS .. h. QVppnt plats Im�rove�+ents - '• i �el.4.ae.ieaen9i ea i R i Ra ise ieu ie aaw� 1. 312nd Avenue and 3rd Street Adjust west curb on publle land on soufhbound i.; approach w4 adjust trsffle signal hoods as required, g; to eras+@ four vorsus present three gouthbound through lanes. Len. drop to be easily accMIAWated south of intersection within omistl a' nfl ,pave@ant ; "rough left turn at ®iscoyne Boulevard spar prior tp Irlckell Avenum bridge approach. Wdify signing one s+raping +hroughout section as required. ?. SE 2nd Avenue and SE 2nd Street Adjust channeliaatlon curbing in southeast corner to provide two eastbound +,rough lanes and three seperett left +urn lanes, plus one free flow left turn lane Inside mW ifled cnannellza+ton island. Two of the left turn lanes for access to 1-95 entrance emep near SE 2nd Avenue end SE 3rd Street, one mandatory and one optional. r Adjustment of channellsstion island in sow+nesst ;y corner to &Iso ollow three sout:wbound tnrougn tones. trensitioned +aroug% intersection with skip guide lines. (One mandatory rlght +urn lone and two through lanes currently In place.) ?z Revise signal heed displays. pedestrlon foaturtsv overhead and other signing, and pavement markings as R required. A-•21 x ^v _ .. • 3. Bfscs a Plata Project En♦rence • i Entrance and exit drives to be coordlnated elto.t vltlm to bifurcated ramp design and Clty of Miami Public Works Department. ,i. Gmme+rlc siteretions et project drives near Biscayne Boulevard Way and Biscayne Boulevard Way. This is to - .• include revised drainage as necessary* outside = _ pavement widening within existing right of ray. - signal izotlon of exit drive to be' instal lad when warrantede and revised pavemnen+ markings. Also provide custom material and construction for opproximOo ly 1s200 feet of sidewalks along project street frontage and rlverwalk frontage, and all Matinge lighting• and Iandscapings all for public Use . } 4. Biscayne Boulevard May Access Rosevey City to preserve present public right of way for saperate 180 eastbound access roadway :outs+ of Biscayne Boulevard May to extend from SE 3rd Avenue { to Biscayne Plaza project sowt4 venlcular traffic entrance. Preservation to extend at lees+ to date of • completion of project Phase 2. (Separate access 3 .roadway not domed necessary to project nest 1. ) A "12 , r b. Surrounding Area 1ffiov@m"ts _(Outs I®s Du nt Plate) 1. SE 2A0 Street betwaaen South MI em 1 Avenue end SE 1st Avenue City seeks opproxhotely five feet of g► dltlonsl right of way within this bICCk'that Is necessary t0 Create three westbound lanes. an add It ion of one travel lane. At the Miami Avenue lntor'pectlon, this improvement would allow a separate left turn lanes a Sepsrste through Ines @W a separate Iwo used es a embination through and slant right to the 1-95 entre"ce romp. 2. SE 2nd Street between SE 1st Avenue and SE,2nd Avenue a ATTACHMENT 6- S:1l.L AF FI,t11lS&A DLF^Te':eCe� Or C/O�'"•!!:{UNIT•Y AFFAIRS e� q• BL1►M•C7•!i DIVISION QF RYSOUPCS F'LANNINO MOM PANACtk.Te� BURSAU OF "A'D AND WATCR NA1;ACr-,A;1• =571 Ssecutive Cantor Circle. Sssr, Tallahassee, Flarxda 32301- R21A . ll01) 1Al�4P2S • sebsectien 300.0101), Florida statutes# places the tesponsibilaty an the developer of an approved development o: regional impact (DRI) for submitting an annual report to the local government. the Regional planning Council. the Depa:teen% of Community Affairs, and to all affected perstit agencies, or. to date specified in the Development order. The failure of a developer to suitmit the to art on the data specified in the i development order may tesu t in the temporary suspension of the development order by the local government until the annual tego:t r to submitted to the review agencies. This requirement applies to j all developments of regional Impact which have been approved since August So 1900. If you have any questions about this requited report, call the DR1 Rnforcement Coordinator at, (SC43 1s!•1123. Please send the original completed annual report to -the designated local goverment official stated in the developtent i, order with (2) copy to each of the followings a) The regional planning agency of jutisdictiont -� b) All.affeeted permitting agenciest # e) Division of Re'souree Planning•and Management 1} Bureau of Land and tester Management 2571 Zaacative Center Cite:*, Sast i Tallahassee, Florida 32301 E Please format your Annual status Report after the fotsaat example provided below. ANNUAL STATUS RIPORT i Reporting Petiods to • MontA/Day/Year Ro:.t:a/Dal;/Year ,� aevelopaents game of DAI Locations , City County 'i Developers lames Company Name i Address: Street Location City, State, ZIP Code tAro; 2 4 1 . r lI Page Two R l) Describe any changes made in the proposed plan of development, phasing, or in the representations contained ir. the Application for Development Approval since the Dev*lopment ct Regional Impact received approval. Please note any actions (substantial detetainational taken by 10941 government to aad;exz these changes,. . Notes It a response is to be more than one sentence, attach as lihibit "A" a detailed deaciption of each change and copies 0! the modified site plan drawings. Rshilbit "A8 should also add:025 the following additional items if applicable, a) Describe changes in the plan of development or phasing for the reporting Yost and for the subsequent years: b) State any known incremental DRI applications tot development approval or requests for a substantial deviation determination that erase filed in the reporting Year and to be filed during the nest year; - e) Attach a copy of any notice at the adoption of - development order or the subsequent modification of an - adopted development order that was recorded by the developer pursuant to Subsection 340.06 (10) (d) # tr.a. 2) Nos that* been a change in local government jurisdicti--n for any portion of the development since the development order was issued? If so# has the annexing local government adopted a new Development of Regional Up at development order for the pro3oct? Please provide a copy of the order adopted by the annfsing local government, 2) Provide copies of any revised waster plans, Incremental site plans# etc., not previously submitted, Notes If a response is to be store than one or two sentences, attach as tsbibit 03.0 d) Provide a summary comparison of development activity proposed and actually conducted for the reporting year. !samples Number of dwelling units constructed, site improve Santa# iota sold, actes mined, gross floor area constructed, barrels of storage capacity completed, permits obtained, etc. Notes If a response if to be more than one sentence, attach as =nbibit •C,' S) Nave any undeveloped tracts of land in the develop en (other than individual single-family lots) been sold to a separate entity or developer? If so, identity tract, its size, and the buyer. Please provide maps which show the tracts Involved. Tract Buyer Notes If a response is to be sore than one sentence, attach as lsbibit On.* i) Describe any lands purchased or optioned sd;ace to he original Development of Regional Impact site susseVen: to Issuance of the development order. Identity such land, its s1:e, and intended use on a site plan and map, Note: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attac` as Bababit •t.• , A-25 j Pate Three 7) List any -substantial local, state, and federal Pet^;®t which have been obtained, applied for# of denied# during tot each. eh�a reporting period. Specify the agency, type of pefs�it, er.¢ duty. notes If a response is to be mote than one sentence, attach art =shibit ep." A) Assess the development #a and local governm%nt'a cor.® tinuing compliance with. any conditions approval contained ie the VAX development order. notes Attach as MAN% •C.® (See attached forte) !) Provide any information that is specifically tequised by tbp Development order to be included in the annual report. 301 Provide a statement certifying that all persona have been sent copies of the annual report In conformance with Subsections 380.06414) and tli)# F.S. ►' Person completing the questionnaires • ?flies ltepsesentings • '�' RFi Y'...r. . ' '. _ .r '. ..,��h :(:no- �� r��- +. .. .. _ * 4 .._ .. •":• .... `! ..M amp -s. ^ .�. ��. ;��. • •� ^~ ®•. •• . ♦ ' . ^• • . • •��s �I ..••. • •r.'M •�.r' .�• ``L'.. . -� ~' •••C • IMM 't. •. ism am m aw- 1 ATTACHMENT 7 DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE TO THE DOWNTOWN DISTRIBUTOR BIFURCATED RAMPS (As Discussed by the Dupont Plaza Task Force) ! 1. A"Itlonel structure 1: 4900 a 3S• j, Retaining wall section } (3301 - Will x 381 3. Inoeoenaant retaining well structure for connector to SE '.rd Ave. 290• it 21, a 401 Increment 4. No Construction at additional lane an SE 3rd St. between SE 2na Ave. and SE 3ra Ave. 330, s 121/9 reconstruction ` 3XI x 2 curb ano gutter S. Traffic signals at SE 3rd Ave./Blecayne Blvd. May and at soutneest financial Center garage 6. Additional features and widening SE 3ra Ave. between Biscayne Biwa. May and SE 3rd St. 2201 x 331/9 (Intl. ralsaa traffic sewetlon) A. 03ingia silo" construction adjacent to Dupont Plaza lbtai • &90' 6.' mre Complex signing, signalizatlon. and markings C. Mere complex malntanence of traffic solreu: ADA -A "00 io 7