Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-86-0799J-86-693 8/14/86 RESOLUTION NC ' A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO ';. INITIATE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST KING'S COIN LAUNDRY IN CONNECTION, WITH ALL REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO THE CITY OF MIAMI REGARDING LOSS OF RENTAL FEES FROM PROPERTY LEASED AT THE OVERTOWN SHOPPING CENTER. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF_MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The City Attorney is hereby authorized to t initiate proceedings against King's Coin Laundry in connection with all remedies available to the City of Miami regarding loss of rental fees from property leased at the Overtown Shopping Center. r? PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day tober, 1 6 XAVIER L. SUAREV MAYOR ATTEST: MATTY HIRAI, CITY. CLERK APPR E ZPRDD xILLOCITY ATTORNEY APPROVE AS TO FORM & CORRECTNESS: L DOUGHER CITY ATTORNEY AV:bf:550 '`uric$ 4r OCT t :dMow ss� CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA INTER.OFFICIE MMMORANDUM TO. Alex Villarello OATIE: July .1, 1986 Assistant City Attorney Law Department SUNJ[cT Overtown Shopping Center Kings's Coin Laundry FROM:laity Schwa�rtR[FER[NC[5: Deirector Department of Development ENCLOSURES: Subsequent to the Department of Development assuming management responsibilities for the Overtown Shopping Center, Janet Reid from our office had a meeting with Mr. Ed King Jr. to ascertain the reason for his not paying rents as stipulated in his lease. He informed her that he had a verbal agreement with the Furr Company to pay only half the rents, and he would furnish the City with records to substantiate his payments so we could make the necessary adjustments. To date he has not furnished the requested documents and our written query to Mr. Furr produced the following information: On October 3, 1983, the Furr Company wrote to Mr. Ed King Sr., Christian Development Inc., stating the terms of the lease for the laundry at the Overtown Shopping Center. The assumption is that the lease delay was acceptable and signed as the next correspondence was dated November 51 1984, acknowledging receipt of rent for November 1984 and underscoring rent concessions made to Mr. King for the months of June, July and August of 1984, when the shopping center was not completed. The communication also stipulated that even with these concessions, Mr. King was still in areas presumably for the months of September and October, in addition to the Merchants Association dues and requested that the accounts be made current. On January 21, 1985, in his reply to Nr. Furr's letter of. November 5th, Mr. 'King stated in effect that the 3 months rent concession was not enough, that his total expenses caused by the delay of the opening of the Shopping Center was $6,111.00 and he expected monthly statements for the entire amount. The next communication dated January 24, 1985 was from kr. Michel King, Vice President of Christian Development, Inc., informing the Furr Company that due to insufficient business the laundry would be closed twice weekly. Alex Villarello w2- July 1, 1986 On January 28, 1985 the Furr company responded by to M. King's letter of January 219t, requesting documentation of expenses of $6,111.00 and offering to make reasonable considerations to his benefit. On February 28, 1985, Mr. Furr informed Mr. King that the Board of Directors had waived all rents since he occupied the Shopping Center in October 1984, thru March 1, 1985. He was further advised that beginning March 1, 1985 he was expected to pay his full amounts of rent plus other expenses associated with his lease. Apparently, Mr. King still did not pay his rents as an eviction notice was filed April 23, 1985. On September 10, 1985, Mr. King informed the Furr Company that because the Board of Directors did not allow him to relocate the laundromat he would vacate the premises on or before September 30, 1985. Mr. Furr responded on September 18th, by offering to work out alternate arrangements to keep Mr. King a tenant at the Shopping Center. In his June 2nd response to our inquiry, Mr. Furr informed my staff that he did have a verbal agreement with Mr. King to accept half of the rents until the Supermarket was re -occupied, but to date Mr. King has not paid any rents. In light of this situation, I suggest your office take whatever action deemed necessary to recuperate the losses to the Shopping