Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-86-0849.1 86-883 ,r� At RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVTW, THE TPaNSMITTAL TO THE SOUTH FLORIDA PFGI0KfL PLANNING COUNCIL OF THE trPI.ICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT tPrROVAL (ADD) FOR DOWNTOWN j MIAMI AS A DESELOPWNT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DR1), IN SUBSTANTIALLY THE FORM ATTACHED. i WHEREAS, by agreement with the Florida: Department of Community Affairs dated June 24, 1985, as amended, the City, through the Downtown Development Authority, committed to the submission of an ADA for Downtown Miami as a ORI pursuant to Section 380.06(21), Florida Statutes by November 25, 1986; and WHEREAS, said agreement was entered into to expedite the development of the Bayside Specialty Center and the Bayfront Park Redevelopment projects; and WHEREAS, economic growth downtown and City control of downtown growth management will be stimulated by an approved downtown DRI, NOW,THER.EFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COfIMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLOR IDA: Section 1. Transmittal by the Downtown Development Authority to the South Florida Regional Planning Council of the Application for Development Approval for Downtown Miami as a development of Regional Impact, in substantially the form attached,is hereby approved. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 23rd day of October , 1986. ATTEST: RAM HIRAI, CITY CURK PREPAR AND APPROVED BY: CHRISTOPHER G. KORGE ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY fi APPROVED CORRECTN Uw •n n. vUw CITY ATTORNEY FORM AND CITY COMMISSION MEETING OF MARKS: OCT 2s 1%6 is ,. — CITY or MIAMI, rLOMMA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO. Honorable Mayor and Members of DATE: 0 C T 16 19% Me: the City Commission sUNJOECT: DOWNTOWN DRI APPLICATION CITY COMMISSION MEETING fRQM: REFERENCES:OCTOBER 23, I986 j Cesar H. Odio City Manager ENCLOSURES It is recomended that the Commission adopt the attached resolution approving the transmittal to the South Florida Regional Planning Council (SFRPC) of the Application for Development Approval (ADA) for Downtown i Miami as a Development of Regional Impact f (DRI) in substantially the form attached. BACKGROUND By agreement with the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) dated June 24, 1985, the City was relieved from preparing a DRI for the Bayside and Bayf ront Park Redevelopment Projects by committing to preparing a DRI application for the area under the jurisdiction of the Downtown Development Authority. The original deadline for submission of the ADA was June 28, 1986. This has been extended by agreement with DCA to November 25, 1986. Beside the benefits to the Bayfront Park and Bayside projects, the Downtown DRI, once approved by SFRPC, will expedite the development approval process faced by developers in the downtown area. These developers will deal directly with the City rather than the SFRPC for development approval. Tampa, Jacksonville, and other Florida cities have already completed Downtown ORI's and they, as well as downtown developers, are very satisfied with the results. These DRI's have proved to be excellent local growth management tools and have shortened and made less expensive the development process for private developers as well as public entities. In compliance with Florida Statutes, the Downtown Development Authority must be i the official applicant for the Downtown DRI approval. The attached ADA seeks SFRPC approval for 7,400,000 square feet of office development, 1,050,000 square feet of retail/service development, 1,000 hotel rooms, 3,550 residential units, and various levels of other types of development projected to occur over the next 5-10 years in the Omni, Central Business District, and Brickell are-s. A separate ADA is being prepared for the Southeast Overtown Park West project area by the Department of Development. Page 1 of 2 CITY OF MIA -MI, FL,00- NA INTER -OFFICE "F""CPA► DV" ra: Honorable Mayor and Members of 01TE 0 CT 16 ft FILE: the City Commission suuECT: DOWNTOWN DRI APPLICATION CITY COMMJSSION MEETING rreoM, ` REFERENCEE OCTOBER 23, 1986 s Cesar H. Odio N City Manager ENCLOSURES It is recommended that the Commission adopt the attached resolution approving the transmittal to the South Florida Regional Planning Council (SFRPC) of the Application for Development Approval (ADA) for Downtown Miami as a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) in substantially the form attached. BACKGROUND By agreement with the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) dated June 24, 1985, the City was relieved from preparing a DRI for the Bayside and Bayfront Park Redevelopment Projects by committing to preparing a DRI application for the area under the jurisdiction of the Downtown Development Authority. The original deadline for submission of the ADA was June 28, 1986. This has been extended by agreement with DCA to November 25, 1986. Beside the benefits to the Bayf ront Park and Bays ide projects, the Downtown DRI, once approved by SFRPC, will expedite the development approval process faced by developers in the downtown area. These developers will deal directly with the City rather than the SFRPC for development approval. Tampa, Jacksonville, and other Florida cities have already completed Downtown ORI's and they, as well as downtown developers, are very satisfied with the results - These DRI's have proved to be excellent local growth management tools and have shortened and made less expcns,ive the development process for private developers as well as public entities. In compliance with Florida Statutes, the Downtown Development Authority must be the official applicant for the Downtown DRI approval. The attached ADA seeks SFRPC approval for 7,400,000 square feet of office development, 1,050,000 square feet of retail/service development, 1,000 hotel rooms, 3,550 residential units, and various levels of other types of development projected to occur over the next 5-10 years in the Omni, Central Business District, and Brickell areas. A separate ADA is being prepared for the Southeast Overtown Park West project area by the Department of Development. Page 1 of 2 r 0 Our consultants advised us that these levels of development can occur without overburdening streets, sewers and other infrastructures already in place or committed to be in place over the next five years. A summary of the ADA is attached. CH01SR Attachments t 84, --if 3 r_9 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVTW THE TRANSMITTAL TO THE SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL. OF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPIENT APPROVAL (ADA) FOR DOWNTOWN MIAMI AS A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DRI), IN SUBSTANTIALLY THE FORM ATTACHED. WHEREAS, by agreement with the Florida Department of Community Affairs dated June 24, 1985, as amended, the City, through the Downtown Development Authority, committed to the submission of an ADA for Downtown Miami as a DRI pursuant to Section 380.06(21 ), Florida Statutes by November 25, I986; and WHEREAS, said agreement was entered into to expedite the development of the Bayside Specialty Center and the Bayfront Park Redevelopment projects; and WHEREAS, economic growth downtown and City control of downtown growth management will be stimulated by an approved downtown DRI; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COt*41SSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section I. Transmittal by the Downtown Development Authority to the South Florida Regional Planning Council of the Application for Development Approval for Downtown Miami as a development of Regional Impact, in substantially the form attached, is hereby approved. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 1986. ATTEST: PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: CHIEF DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY XAVILK L. 5UAKL19 MAYOR APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: CITY ATTORNEY 86S APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL DOWNTOWN MIAMI DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Preface If Downtown Miami is to remain the commercial center of the region, it must be able to physically and environmentally accommodate a considerable amount of new (svelopment. As the coamp rcial hub of a large metropolitan area, there will always be heavy traffic, noise, and some air pollution. Halting downtown development would be the only way to avoid these conditions. However, by careful planning for and monitoring of growth, over.. -burdening of the infrastructure and the environment can be avoided and Downtown Miami can continue to grow and prosper. A Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Application for Development Approval (ADA) is a series of responses to environmental, transportation, economic and other questions posed by the South Florida Regional Planning Council (SFRPC) which will enable them to determine what negative and/or positive impacts a particular development will have on the environment and the carrying capacities of the highways, sewers, utilities, and public services (infrastructure) in the region. If a development does not negatively impact on regional infrastructure and environment, or if it does but mitigating actions are pledged by the developer, the SFRPC will approve the issuance of a Development Order (D.O.) by the City or County. In 1980, the Florida Legislature added Section 380.06(22) to the Florida Statutes governing Developments of Regional Impact to permit Downtown Development Authorities to submit DRI applications covering ail or part of their districts. This was done to enhance the development potential of Florida's downtowns through good planning and by relieving the costly, time-consuming DRI burden from individual developers. The Downtown DRI process will result in a Development Order (D.O.) that will serve as a planning and growth management tool to specifically guide downtown development for 5-10 years and provide the framework for development approval through the year 2005. This application focuses on analyses of the regional impacts that are likely to result from growth in all types of land use projected to occur downtown over the next 5-10 years (Phase I). The existing regional infrastructure (highways, streets, drainage systems, public services, etc.) have been examined to determine their capacities to support the projected growth. Where infrastructure capacities are fragile or already overburdened, the application identifies the new, improved, and/or expanded infrastructure elements that will have to be provided before the full Phase I development potential can be realized. L 0 It should be noted that regardless of the available or intended regional infrastructure capacities identified herein, individual projects may have consequences on the local (city and/or county) streets, sewers, sidewalks and other infrastructure not the subject of this application. In that event, the City may condition development approvals on the realization of improvements and/or amenities that will mitigate any adverse consequences. The Downtown DRI will expedite the development process, savino developers' time and money and thereby improving the attractiveness of downtown's development climate. However, all developments that exceed 10,000 square feet will have to demonstrate their compatibility with the network of public infrastructure and public services as well as public policies that exist before they will be permitted. tarae scale projects will face a more rigorous process requiring the granting of a Major Use Special Permit prior to construction. The City, not the Regional Planning Council, will administer the developrr•u-,nt reviews and approvals merntioned above. Introduction The Project is a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) encompassing the area of the City of Miami under the jurisdiction of the Downtown Development Authority (DDA); with the exception of the S.E. Overtown/Park West redevelopment area. The Project, in conjunction with the preparation of a Downtown !Miami Master Plan, will guide and govern development activity through the year 2005. This Application for Development Approval (ADA) differs significantly from the usual DRI, not only in magnitude, but more importantly in that there is no predetermined development program. The City provides a framework for new development through its comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance, but the exact location, size and mix of individual projects cannot be predicted. Thus, the Downtown DRI must provide enough flexibility for new development to occur anywhere within the project area, subject to commitment of necessary infrastructure. Boundaries The DOA District encompasses approximately 1.6 square miles. The district is generally bounded by S.E./S.W. 15th Road on the south, Biscayne Bay on the east, N.E./N.W. 11th Street on the north, and the Mtetrorail alignment, the F.E.C. Railroad, and N.W. 3rd Avenue on the west. For the DRI, the DDA District has been divided into four sub -areas: 1. Central Business District 2. Omni 3. Brickell 4. Park West. The Park West sub -area is the subject of an ongoing DRI application for the S.E. Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Project. Impacts From the Park Nest area will be incorporated into this project in the form of a committed development. (See Study Area .Map on Page 10). r r Pro3ect Nlethodolo The analysis has been conducted for three phases of development. The first phase of projected new development is planned to occur within a 5-10 year period. Only this first phase of development will be approved by the South Florida Regional Planning Council (SFRPC) in the Development Order, Phases II and III are viewed as long range (10-20 year) planning exercises that will require updating and more detailed evaluation in the future, The amount of development projected for each phase is based upon a combination of market analysis and capacity of the infrastructure system. The growth projections utilized for this project are greater than projections for downtown developed by Dade County. The adjusted projections herein are development scenarios, not real projections of growth. This was done in order- to provide a margin of safety in case real growth exceeds Dade County projections and also to create a bank of development credits of sufficient quantity to compensate for credits that will be granted to projects that for whatever reasons are not realized during the life of the Development Order. Growth Projections The following growth projections by study sub -area were the basis of the ORI analysis: Central Business District Land Use Phase I Phase II Phase III Existing Growth Growth Growth Total ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office 12,185,000 3,250,000 1,750,000 1g500,000 18,685,000 Retail/Service 31107,000 650,000 250,000 250,000 4,257,000 Hotel (Rooms) 39660 650 igloo 5,410 Residential (Units) 500 11000 800 10020 39320 Convention 2509000 250g000 5000000 Wholesale/Industrial 50,000 50g000 100,000 Institutional 34,400 300,000 300t000 634,400 Attractions/Recreation 5,000 39400 19600 59000 159000 (Seats) BrickelI Land Use -------------------- ------------- ---.------------------ ----- ---------- ----- Office 89027,160 3,000,000 1,5009000 1,300,000 13,827,160 Retail/Service 336,550 350,000 100,000 150,000 936,550 Hotel (Rooms) 1,060 350 11410 Residential (Units) 41,660 2,050 1,450 1,500 91660 Open Space 81,975 89975 Omni Land Use Office 878,100 1,150,000 700,000 19100,000 3,8289100 Retail/Service 1,653,740 500000 509000 1000000 i,853,740 Hotel (Rooms) 1,520 500 2,020 Residential (Units) 2,660 500 300 400 39860 Convention 2509000 250,000 Wholesale/Industrial 10000,000 1,000,000 10000,000 Employment Over 44,000 construction jobs will be generated over the three phases of projected growth through the year 2005. Phase I will produce over 20,000 construction jobs. It is anticipated that approximately 3,500 new permanent retail jobs, 67,000 office jobs, and 2,000 industrial jobs will also be generated between 1986 and 2005. Phase I accounts for approximately 50% of these new jobs. This new employment will add significantly to the local economy. Revenues The growth scenarios listed above will have a substantial impact on the tax base of the City, the County and the School Board. Based on 1985 millage rates and an assessment to value ratio of 75%, the following ad valorem taxes have been estimated: 4 i Central Business District Phase I Phase II Phase III Total Value $8609893,396 $436,721,818 $600,474,015 $1,898,089,229 New Ad Valorem Taxes $18,534,194 $9,273,161 $12,785,455 $40,592,810 Bricl;ell Phase I Phase II Phase III Total Value $1,051,188,739 $543,166,850 $509,941,554 $2,104,297,143 New Ad Valorem Taxes $22,265,646 $11,332,790 $10,578,428 $44,176,864 0M, i Phase I Phase II Phase III Total Value $286,494,475 $198,274,750 $280,169,239 $76499389464 New Ad Valorem Taxes $6,094,235 $4,237,942 $5,998,903 $16,331,080 Over $100,000,000 in new ad valorem taxes could be realized resulting from new growth downtown from 1935 to 2005. The City's share of this will be approximately $33,000,000. Phase I alone accounts for approximately $47,000,000 overall and $15.5 million for the City. Furthermore, over $13,000,000 in non -ad valorem revenues (permit fees, water and sewer, Metromover assessments, etc.) could also be generated from the projected growth. This does not include impact fees that the City and County may assess new developments. Summary of Findings and Recommendations Following is a summary of the findings and recommendations contained in each of the major topics (questions) required to be addressed in the A.D.A. Questions 1-3 are application formalities not included in this Summary. Question 4; Air Quality Federally mandated standards for carbon monoxide CO levels could be violated in very localized "hot spots" if vehicular traffic flow is not properly managed. The one monitoring station within the project area (on Flagler Street) shows existing CO concentrations high enough to suggest that the SFRPC and Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FOER) will require individual developments to prepare air quality modeling studies, and to implement all traffic flow improvements necessary to correct any CO violations predicted by the studies. However, the consultant believes that the modeling procedures required by FDER will greatly overestimrte CO 5 :'. dr"N 0 concentrations caused by new development, resulting in potential denial of projects or exaction of unnecessary, costly transportation improvements. The ADA recommends that two additional CO monitoring stations be established, one in the Omni cub -area and one in the Brickell sub -area, in order to document lower CO concentrations in these areas and, thereby, to eliminate the need for air quality modeling studies by individual developers. The estimated 186,500 capital cost. and $26,200 annual operating cost of these two monitoring stations would likely be funded by developer fees. For projects located in the CBD sub --area, the ADA recommends modifications to the FDER's modeling procedures aimed at improving the accuracy of the model's predictions, thereby, reducing unnecessary mitigating measures that would be exacted from developers. uestion 6: hater Quaff/Drainage Numerous studies have documented that existing water quality problems in Biscayne Bay and the Miami River are primarily caused by pollutants carried by storm water runoff. The solution to the problem in Downtown is to eliminate existing storm water collection systems that drain directly into the Bay and River and replace them with systems that direct storm water into the ground. Since all new development is already required to comply with strict on -site drainage standards, the continued growth of downtown can only result in improved water quality. The ADA recommends a groundwater testing program to verify that there are no harmful effects from deep well drainage systems ($43,000 to be funded by private development); and a monitoring program at existing storm water outf ails to be carried out by the City's Public Works Department to help prioritize the need for replacement of drainage systems in public streets. Question 6: Wetlands Not Applicable Question 7: Flood Prone Areas The ADA recommends that existing flood protection criteria and procedures are sufficient to protect property from flooding and storm surge. An important unresolved issue is that in much of Brickell and Omni, and in portions of the CBO sub area, there is a 3-8 ft. difference between the existing sidewalk elevation and minimum ground floor elevations required by flood criteria, making it difficult to provide windows and/or retail storefronts along pedestrian streets. To comply with City policy for active sidewalk edges, developers must provide special flood proofing for spaces below minimum flood criteria level or obtain a variance from the Metro Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management. The City will consider applying for an economic hardship finding from the federal government that could result in a reduction in minimum floor elevations in the downtown area. 6 r T uestion 8: Veaetation and Wildlife The only significant regional issues concerning vegetation and wildlife are continued efforts to protect endangered manatees in the Miami River and prohibition against use of certain plant materials considered potentially harmful to human health or the environment. The AQA recommend- these efforts be continued. uestion 9: Historic and Archeolo0 cal Sites The AQA identifies 31 buildings, 3 groupings of buildings, one object, and 11 archeological zones worthy of listing on the National Register of Historic Places. The AQA reconds Management plans to encourage preservation. Question 10: Emplorment and Economic Characteristics See discussion of employment and revenues on page 4. uestion 11. Transportation The most important analysis to both planners and developers in planning for downtown growth is the transportation network and its ability to move people and goods in and out of downtown efficiently. Parking supply and parking policies are part of this analysis. To determine the capacity of the existing transportation network to accommodate Phase I growth, all existing streets, bridges, parking and transit facilities were built into the analysis as well as the following committed (i.e. funded, underway, or required by existing project development orders) transportation improvements: a) Reconstruction of S.W. 8th Street from I-95 to U.S. 1 to provide four lanes. b) Reconstruction of the I-95 mainline from the Downtown Distributor to I-3J5/S.R. 836 and the widening of the Downtown Distributor north- bound entrance ramp onto I-95. This reconstruction will provide an additional lane on the mainline and also on the entrance ramp. c) The new Port bridge connecting the Port of Miami to U.S. 1. The improvement includes a new six lane high-level bridge and also major modifications to the Biscayne Boulevard/Port Boulevard Intersection. d) Brickell Avenue/S.E. 10th Street. Signalization and southbound left turn lane. 7 Y O C ■ e) Brickell Avenue/S.E. 12th Street. Roadway modification and signalization. f) Brickell Avenue/S.E. 14th Street. Signalization and intersection modification. g) S.W. 13th Street/S.W. 15th Road/S.W. 3rd Avenue. Intersection signalization and restriping. The Metromover extensions to the O.m i and Brickell areas, though not fully "committed", were considered in Noe transportation analysis and conclusions. The ADA reco*nds that with the exception of a few intersections, the existinv and committed transportation network will be able to adequately acconnodate the Phase I growth scenario. A number of non -capital intensive options will be considered to mitigate over -.congestion at problem intersections. Parking supply and policies are being studied as part of the Dade County Parking/Transit Ridership Study currently underway. That study will be completed and its conclusions considered prior to the completion of the Downtown DRI approval process. uestion 12A: Wastewater Water, and Solid Waste The county -wide capacity for wastewater treatment, water treatment, and solid waste disposal is projected to be more than adequate to serve future growth in downtown, based upon capital improvements planned by Metro Dade County. The ADA recommends a ;monitoring program to ensure that neN downtown growth cannot outpace the implementation of the needed capital improvements. The existing construction permitting system ensures that developers pay their fair share of countywide improvements and any necessary improvements to the local distribution lines for water and sanitary sewer. Question 12Bs Health Care, Police,. and Fire The ADA recommends that there are no issues of significant regional concern identified for these services. City of Miami impact fees will provide for minor capital improvements (mainly equipment) needed by the Police and Fire Department. Increased property tax revenue should be sufficient to cover increased operating expenses related to new growth. Question i2Ca Energy Planned Florida Power and Light Company improvements will provide sufficient electrical power to serve projected downtown growth. The ADA recommends a monitorinv orooram to ensure that needed improvements are implemented coincident with new development. Energy efficient construction guidelines are recolmnsnded for new development. _ue5tipn 12D� �duratir_n Other than 3ooker T. Washington Jr. High School, no additional schools are programmed to serve the project area. The ADA recommends a monitoring program to inform the Dade County School System of proposed new residential development and aid in planning for future enrollment. Question 12E__ Recreation and Open Space The ADA recomm-nds that future open space and recreation needs be provided by improvements to existing publicly owned lands and requirements for on - site open space in new private developments. _Question 13: Housing There is a total of 7,500 existing housing units in downtown, which is projected to increase by 3,884 by the end of Phase I. The ADA recnds that the City assist housing construction and rehabilitation with all available resources. Development Approval Process The City will be required to monitor all development exceeding 10,000 square feet by DRI sub -areas to assure that infrastructure capacities are not exceeded. When a developer seeks development approval from the City, the infrastructure capacity bank for the sub -area and the type of land use(s) proposed will be examined to determine if those capacity banks can support the proposed development. If so (assuming that other pre -conditions that may be imposed by the City are !net) the developer will be issued development credits and approval for the proposed development. The city will then deduct the amount of credits issued the developer from the development credits available for the affected land use(s) for the sub -area. This credit/debit process will continue for each sub -area. Once credits are exhausted, the permitting of future develop,nent must cease until a new D.O. is issued. Additions to the infrastructure (i.e., new bridges, expanded street capacities, etc.) will result in a replenishment of development credits in the sub -area in which they occur and/or affect. 9 i 1 To avoid developer hoarding of credits to the detriment of others seeking development approval, development credits will expire after a specific time period that will be established by the City. Conclusion If this application is approved by the South Florida Regional Planning Council, the resulting Phase I Development Order will permit the following growth to be allowed by the City. Office 7,400,000 square feet Retail 1,056,000 square feet Hotel 1,000 Rooms Residential 3,500 Units Convention Facilities 250,000 square feet Industrial/Wholesale 11050,000 square feet As Phase I growth is being realized, this application will be updated to apply for Phase II growth approval. PLANNING FAC 1 c1sEF 7 APPLICANT PETITION REQUEST 8ACKGROUNO City of 4xir%-i e 1 -gin i no nepartment: September 26, 10F6 3. Consideration of reco,,nnding that the City Commission =wrove t►c t.ranFmittal to the South Florida Regional Plannino Council of the Application for Develorir's nt Approval for Downtown Miami A c a Development of Regional Impact. To subirit 3,1 APPlicat.ion for Development Approval (ADA) for Downtown P,iami as a Development of Regional impact (DRI) to the South Florida Reoionral Planning Council. As a result of an agreement. between the City of Miami and the Florida Department of Community Affairs, in which the Bayside Specialty Center and Bayfront Park were allowed to proceed, the City was required to submit an ADA to the South Florida Planning Regional Council by -November 25, 1986 (date as extended). The ADA will be submitted by the Downtown Development Authority (ODA) under state enabling legislation that allows DDAs to submit ADAs for the territory under their jurisdiction; the ADA was prepared by the Planning Department with the assistance of consultants. Following this submittal to the South Florida Regional Planning Council, the Council staff will conduct a review for approximately 3 months; the Council swill then make their recommendation to the City Commission as to whether the ADA should be approved. The City Commission will take the SFRPC recommendation under advisement and issue a Development Order approving, or modifying with conditions, the DRI proposal. The benefits are three fold: a) Major proposed development, if it "fits" within the parameters of the Oevelopment Order can look for speedy approval. b) Fees will be returned to the City rather than being sent on to the SFRPC. PAS 10/15/86 age I s 3 t 1 0 The City is assured that necessary ini.astruct,are is planned and funded in time to meet the needs of new development. ANALYSIS The ADA show: that fnr the rc_zt 5_10 years, i Downtown Miami ran c!rntinoe to Sh re in the region wide nowt}1 in ttt_sildings' poet 'it.ion and employment and teat the n&CF_ccary infrastrttGture will be in place to nr_co�tnodate this growth at minimal impact. to natural resoorces. Where impacts become significant as in the case of traffic, mitigation measures (physical improvements or better operating procedures) are provided. REC"ENDATIONS PLANNING DEPT. Approval. TOW AtT6 WAI Py �y�� SOUTH FLORIDA APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL - QUESTIONNAIRE FOR DOWNTOWN/AREAWIDE DRIs QUESTION I. APPLICATION INFORMATION A. I, Roy F. Kenzie, THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE' Downtown Development Authority (APPLICANT) HEREBY PROPOSE TO UNDERTAKE A OEVELOPMENI OF REGIONAL- T AS DEFINED IN SECTION 380.06, FLORIDA STATUTES, AND CHAPTER 27F-1, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. IN SUPPORT THEREOF I SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION CONCERNING The Downtown Development of Re ional IT2act (NAME OF DEVELOPMENT) WHICH 7NF0Rl9TItiR' OF MY KNOWLEDGE. B.. APPLICANT (NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE). The Downtown Development Authority of the City of Miami, Florida, Suite 1818, One Biscayne Tower, Miami, Florida; 33131, 305/579-6675. C. AUTHORIZED AGENT(S), (NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE). n/a ., 0. ATTACH. A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT SITE. (INCLUDE SECTION. TOWNSHIP, AND RANGE OR SUBDIVISION). See Page 1-2. E. LIST AGENCIES (LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL) FROM WHICH APPROVAL AND/OR A PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INITIATION OF DEVELOPMENT. SPECIFY THE PERMITS) OR APPROVAL(S) BY AGENCY. PROVIDE COPIES OF ANY SUBMITTED PERMIT APPLICATIONS. Because of the non-specific nature of the development approval applied for herein, this question is not applicable. BE,,,, 9 m( w MAP A PROJECT • ir,�: a 0 Protect Legal Description Begin at the intersection of the centerlines of N.W. 5th Street and N.N. 3rd Avenue (east side of N S Expressway (1-95)), said point of beginning also being the N.W. corner of the district- thence run southerly along +he center line of N.W. 3rd Avenue and the easterly side of the H-S Expressway to the centerline of West Hagler Street; thence westerly along the centerline of said West Flagler Street to the centerline of the Miami River, thence meandering southeasterly along the centerline of said Mimi River to a point of intersection with the easterly right-olr-way (4/W) line of Metro Rapid Transit R/W (form rly Florida East Coast (FEC) Railroad R/W) said R/W line being 50 feet easterly of and parallel with the centerline of said Metro Rapid Transit R/W; thence run southerly and southwesterly along said easterly R/W line of Pietro Rapid Transit to the intersec- tion with the centerline of S.N. 15th Road; thence southeasterly along the centerline of 15th Road to a point of intersection with the southerly prolongation of the, westerly line of COSTA BELLA DEVELOPMENT SUBDIVISION (107-14); thence northeasterly, northwesterly and northeasterly along said westerly line of COSTA BELLA to the intersection with the southerly right-of-way line of S.E. 14th Lane; thence southeasterly, northeasterly, northerly, and northwesterly along said southerly and westerly right-of-way line of S.E. 14th Lane and S.E. 14th Terrace to the intersection with the northwesterly property line of Lot 31 Block 2 of Amended Plat of POINT VIEW as recorded in Plat Book 2 at Page 93 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; thence northeasterly along the northwesterly line of said Lot 31 to the northeasterly side of the existing ten foot alley in Block 2 of said POINT VIEW; thence southeasterly along the northeasterly side of said ten foot alley to the intersection with the property line between Lots 4 and 5 of said Block 2 of POINT VIEW; thence northeasterly along said line of Lots 4 and 5 and its prolongation thereof to the centerline of S.E. 14th Street; thence southeasterly along said centerline of S.E. 14th Street to a point of intersection with the existing bulkhead and shoreline of Biscayne Bay; thence meandering northerly along the existing bulkhead and shoreline of Biscayne Say to a point of intersection with the southerly boundary of Cl aughton Island Bridge; thence easterly along the said southerly R/W line of Claughton Island Bridge to the intersection with the westerly bulkhead line of Cl aughton Island, said bulkhead line being part of the Metropolitan Dade County, Bulkhead Line as recorded in Plat Book 73 at Page 18 of the Public Records; thence southerly, easterly, northerly and westerly, following said existing bulkhead t,and its westerly prolongation thereof around the island to the intersection with the m3fnland on the easterly shoreline of Biscayne Bay; thence meandering in a northwesterly and westerly direction along the shoreline of Biscayne Bay and the Miami River to the intersection with the easterly R/W line of Brickel1 Avenue Bridge (S.E. 2nd Avenue); thence north along said bridge to the existing bulkhead on the northerly shoreline of the Mimi River; said bulk line also being the southerly boundary of the Dupont Plaza Center and Miami Center Joint Venture property; thence northeasterly along the southerly boundary of Dupont Plaza Center and Miami Center Joint Venture property to a point of intersection With the easterly property line of Chopin Associates and Miami Center Limited Partnership; said property line being along the shoreline of Biscayne Bay; thence northerly along said easterly property 1 i ne of Chopin Associates and Miami Center Limited Partnership property along Biscayne Bay to the southerly property line of Bayfront Paris; thence continuing northerly, a. t northeasterly and northwesterly along the bulkhead line of Bayfront Park and i the Bayfront Park Miamarina; thence continuing northerly along the bulkhead line of Biscayne Bay to a point of intersection with the centerline of N.E. 17th Street extended easterly; thence westerly along the centerline of N.E. 17th Street and its extension thereof to the easterly R/W line of the FEC Railroad; thence southerly along the easterly R/W line of the FEC Railroad to the limited access right-of-way of I-395; thence southeasterly and easterly along the limited access right-of-way of I-391 to the centerline of Biscayne Boulevard, thence southerly along the centerline of Biscayne Boulevard to the centerline of N.E. 5th Street, thence westerly along the centerline and N.E. and N.W. 5th Street to the point of beginning. �` t� - � ,..-w.-• � ✓..»+� n,.r. ' . .. +. ..�j.. w.... � ' naawa.-at! ..., :. n..n-+wv-.:+....: .a. �.r...>a.w+ - ,. .... ..y ..-wwa.:..}:.n,rs, . "„F"'s +: :.w,.... ti.�rsee.r+.. QUESTION 3: PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. PROVIDE A BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PROGRAM The Project is a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) encompassing the area of the City of Miami under the jurisdiction of the Downtown Development Authority (DDA); with the exception of the S.E. Overtown/Park Nest redevelopment area. The Project, in conjunction with the preparation of a downtown Miami master plan, will guide and govern downtown development activity through the year 2005. This Application for Development Approval (ADA) differs significantly from the usual DRI project, not only in magnitude, but more importantly in that there is no predetermined development program. The City provides a framework for new development through its Comprehensive Plan and zoning ordinance, but the exact location, size and mix of individual projects cannot be predicted. Thus, the downtown DRI must provide enough flexibility for new development to occur anywhere within the project area, subject to commitment of necessary infrastructure. Project Area Boundaries The ODA District encompasses approximately 1.6 square miles. The district is generally bounded by S.E./S.W. 15th Road on the south, Biscayne Bay on the east. N.E./N.W. 17th Terrace on the north, and the Metrorail alignment, the F.E.C. Railroad, and N.W. 3rd Avenue on the west. (See Project Area Map ). Existing Conditions The Project area currently contains 21,089,935 square feet of commercial and government office space; 5,097,454 square feet of retail/service space; 6,236 hotel rooms; 7,830 resideintial units; 34,400 square feet of institu ona uses; and 5 attraction/recreational seats. Approximately 109.500 employees work within the Project boundaries. The 1986 assessed value of real and personal property in the Project area is $2.8 billion. Downtown Miami experienced unprecedented growth between 1976 and 1986. Since 1982, growth, in the retail sector, has shed. This trend is expected to reverse itself as Miami broadens its appeal to the domestic markets and as South and Central American economies rebound. P4 f. - MW rid OR *I W# IV r MMMQITM jis 1 �+ IDOWNTOWN� MASTERPLp I a somemo, ', -.4R* .1 ,M. • af mll *�,�, ry':} i i 44;_ .r I us C-j a Nall meow WdM m1fill 24 1' w t Aft — .ter •a..•• � �. •. � r,. t '� �'s um DOWNTOWN-17p*w- MA5TERF'L; 5FVElppMEN7 OF iiEfildNAL IMPACT N Project Planning Areas For Project purposes, the DDA District has been divided into four sub- areas: 1. Central Business District 2. Omni 3. Brickell 4. Park West. The Park West sub -area is the subject of an ongoing DRI application for the S.E. Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Project. Impacts from the Park Vest area will be incorporated into this project in the fora of a committed de*zlopment. Central Business District (CBD) Midtown This sub -area of the downtown CBD is Community College Campus and the U.S. primary uses are centrally located within a mix of medium density office and retail Flagler Street Corridor dominated by the Miami -Dade Courthouse facilities. These the area and are surrounded by use. Flagler Street is the main street of downtown Miami. The emphasis of the street is on retail uses and the pedestrian shopping experience. In addition to retail uses, the street is flanked by office and government related uses. The corridor links Biscayne Bay/Bayfront Park to the Miami River. Gusman Hall, a landmark center for theatrical productions and concerts, is on the National Register and one of the main focal points along Flagler Street. Dupont Plaza This area of downtown has been the site of the ma j on ty of recent high density development activity. The emphasis of development has been on high density office uses. This area also functions as the major entrance into downtown from Interstate 95 and as such is the first visual image one gets of the city and downtown CBD. Government Center The Government Center is a joint development area for City, County and State Government facilities to serve existing and future needs of local residents. A Master Plan for the area is in the process of being implemented and includes an open space park to link the various uses and activities. The area also includes the new Dade County Public Library, Historical Museum and Center for the Fine Arts. The area is well served by both Metrorail and Metromover via the Government Center Station; the main downtown station of the system. Bayfront This area is downtown Miami's Bayfront Park System. It includes Bicentennial Park, the F.E.C. tract, Bayside Specialty Center and Bayfront Park. The area is the "Central Park" of Miami and the premier open space of its downtown. i= ..Boulevard This area is the Biscayne Boulevard Corridor which includes the boulevard right-of-way and the first block of uses fronting the boulevard along its western edge. The boulevard is an important link between the adjacent areas of downtown and the Bayfront Park System/Biscayne Bay. The boulevard is also a major north/south vehicular access route within downtown and one of the most frequently seen images projected to the rest of the country and the world. River Quadrant This area is one of the few remaining major undeveloped parcels along the Miami River adjacent to the downtown CBD. A Florida Power 6 Light Sub -Station occupies the center of this parcel and is a major factor to be considered when contemplating any future development of the area. With the exception of some industrial uses along the river, the majority of the parcel is vacant land used for surface parking. Omni Area Omni Present development emphasis within the Omni area is concentrated around the Omni/Plaza Venetia Complexes. High density residential and commercial uses along the bayfront and along the east side of Biscayne Boulevard dominate the area. The west side of the boulevard contains a strip of medium density commercial uses which extend west to N.E. 2nd Avenue. The areas west of the boulevard and north of the Omni are mixed with some low and medium density residential. The Dade County School Board Administrative offices as well as its Anna Brenner Meyer Telecommunications Center are also in this area. Omni West Existing development within the Omni West sub -area is predominantly low density residential and commercial service uses. The low density residential uses occupy the eastern portion of the area with the service commercial uses located in general along the F.E.C. Railroad right-of-way and adjacent to I-395 and alon4 N.E. 2nd Avenue. Brickell Area Brickell Avenue 1 ' This area has been called the Financial District of the city or the equivalent of New York's Wall Street. The site of the greatest activity in office and luxury condominium construction outside the immediate CBD, the area has become a prestigious address for several foreign and domestic corporations. At the present tiare, almost 2,000,000 square feet of office space is under construction. i SERMON.i�fYilMYi..7�.I1P.Mr�.r.11U1O..1�Iq�1�..Iwr. - Brickell Central This area directly west of the Brickell Avenue Corridor contains mixed use development centered on Miami Avenue. It presently functions as the transition area between Brickeli's high density development and the medium density predominantly residential uses further west. Brickell Key This high density mixed development is in the process of being implemented on Claughton Island southeast of downtown. Phase I of the luxury condominium complex is completed and Phase II is now underway. The Couvoisier Corporation has a 100,000 square foot corporate headquarters under construction on the island. S.E. Overtown/Park West This sub -area is a designated redevelopment area. Developers for the first 9 blocks have been selected and construction of the first residential units is anticipated in 1986. A proposed site for the construction of a Sports Arena and possibly an Exhibition Hall is also located within the redevelopment area. The boundaries of this sub -area are I-395 to the north, N. 5th Street to the south, Biscayne Boulevard to the east and I-95 to the west. Both the S.E. Overtown/Park West and Sports Arena projects are the subjects of separate DRI's. Project Methodology The analysis will be conducted for three phases of development. The first phase of projected new development is planned to occur within a 5- 10 year period. Only this first phase of development will be approved in the initial Development Order. Phases II and III will be viewed as long range (10-20 year) planning exercises that will require updating and more detailed evaluation in the future. The mount of development projected for each phase will be based upon a combination of market analysis and capacity of the infrastructure system. The growth projections utilized for this project are greater than projections for downtown developed by Dade County. The adjusted projections herein are development scenarios, not real projections of growth. This was done in order to provide the applicant with a margin of safety in case real growth exceeds Dade County projections and also to create a bank of development credits of sufficient quantity to compensate for credits that will be granted to projects that for whatever reasons are not realized during the life of the Development Order. �J B. COMPLETE TABLE 3.1 Table 3.1 displays existing (1986) and projected land uses and development phasing. (See following page.) C. DESCRIBE THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE PROJECT TO EXISTING ZCAING, COMPREHENSIVE PLANS AND ANY SPECIAL REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS. In the City of Miami, planning objectives and guidelines are set forth in the Comprehensive Nei vaborhood Plan. The plan is periodically revised to accommodate changing conditions in growth and development that occur as the city matures. Zoning, too, is part of this continuous fine-tuning process as it conforms to the Comprehensive Plan. Downtown zoning regulations are included in the City of Miami Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 9500. (See Appendix ) The Downtown Development Authority and the City of Miami Planning Department have undertaken the preparation of a Downtown Development Plan which is expected to be completed in 1986. The plan will be the basis for new policy formulation. Downtown waterfront development is further regulated by Subpart A Section 3(4)(b) of the City of Miami Charter. This section sets forth set back and side yard requirements and contains provisions for pedestrian access to the waterfront. In 1985, Dade County adopted Ordinance 85-14 to provide a unified management system for the Biscayne Bay shoreline area to preserve the 9 basic qualities, characteristics, and the natural, recreational and aesthetic values of the Bay area. To implement the Biscayne Bay management Plan, the Ordinance established a Shoreline Development Review Committee composed of professionals in architecture, landscape architecture, and urban design and a representative from the Builder's Association of South Florida. This Committee is charged with the responsibility of reviewing plans and applications for development action for developments of all types. excluding single family and duplex residential, that are planned along the Biscayne Bay shoreline. Plans are reviewed for their consistency with the Dade County Comprehensive Master Plan, the Biscayne Bay Management Plan, and the Biscdyne Bay Aquatic Preserve Act as well as County and municipal codes. Individual projects that will be developed downtown under the development order that will result from this application will be subject to review by the Biscayne Bay Shoreline Review Comittee if the projects are planned for shoreline areas. { L r 1 Notwithstanding. the downtown DRI, certain downtown projects, due to their size, character and/or location will require consideration and approval by the City Commission before building permits wAy be issued. Article 28, Section 2801 through 2807 of the Zoning Code (Ordinance 95M appendix ) sets forth criteria and application procedures for projects requiring a Major Use Special Permit approved by the Commission The process, criteria, and development thresholds involved with Major Use Special Permits will likely be modified as a result of v the Downtown DRI. TABLE 3.1: EXISTING AND PROJECTED LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT PHASING C1111'aal. "SIKSS 91STRICT LAW SK 911STING CHANGE PARK I CRAM run II CNAM" 'Puss III 1A ..................... ........... ............ ........ ... ... . ..... ............ .. . ....... SIPYICI 11164675 325800 15434679 MOM 17184975 t 1090040 11684616 RITAILISENTICE s 3101162 i. 650000 s 3767192 s 2S0000 s 4401162 2601000 s 4151142 NOVEL IRONS) s 3s60 s 460 s 4310 s i 4310 1100 9410 USIKNfAIL OWS) 601 Im 1607 Soo 2307 laze 3327 CONUATION t s almo t 250000 t t 154000 i 166000 t Siom VOKESAU/1101STRIAL s t Som s Sem Som 60000 IOMO INSTIMISM s 34400 i 300004 334400 334400 MOD s $34400 ATTIACTIONSAICREATION: MI s 3400 s 0400 ISOM t ISM t IM t ISM (SEATS) ISICKELL LANO In CIISTING CHANGE FNASK I CRAMU VRAM 11 CPJM PNASC III . . ................... ........... ............ ............ ............ ............ t ...... ........... It orriel 8011140 MOM 11021164 15000" 12527160 1360000 13127160 J 21fAILACAMI I 336653 36000 = SUSS3 IMOO i 784653 i ISOM i 936953 MGM NONSI lose i 3SO s 1410 c i 1410 i i 1419 f USIUNTAIL WITS) s "64 t 2050 s 6714 s 1460 s 8164 INS i "44 t @PCs SPACE i i "is Im Niirt LAW VSS akISTING • CHANGE PAMSE I CNAMGF PANU 11 CNAN" PUS[ III - — ------------------- ----------- :`7 ........ :-1-1 ------........................ MICE Mtoe i, 1150000 i 2028196 a fewo a 2128100 0 1104400 3828100 i i t s i UTAILIMAVICE 1653739 SOM 110113# Sam 1153139 104000 s 1653739 NOTIL ISOM) t 1619 t i 1616 s 9" s 2016 s gel$ SESIDENTAIL (NNITS) t 2619 s $00 i 3119 s 344 3459 t 400 3459 C"TINTION t t 2560" ISWO t I ISOM s i 26060 VMKISALMNIVSTRIAL 1800406 t"Goof loosm Imace Isoom --84 74 EH aw l if o wr Nawwer � 06� VWW "vo#A, kitNw M& i ...nril i.a MAPP - I GENERALIZED EXISTING LAND USE D OWNTOWN MASTER PLAN MEVELOPMENT REGIONAL IMPACT .. Y1il� �P�iYitiralrM �. P .K7- r _g �rl` rTr f_ r i iiYYiYirY'iiT r Z� r r11�Wi� 1r11iir -Air �711 !4%'-� um MTIA raw, I' aaxto Loss i wannirawNL 9DUCATlM ARTS 9MIF lTArOMUff MVGAF rota wxm uis j wvrwauoaT ' auw�T INOiJaTiWiL j l .ZZ.. AAd a$ e� w sr Verc &,,& r ft-d as Jaw" ► na wkwwh d M*..irr MAP H - MASTER LAND USE PLAN DOW'N TOWN7#40tdiM A STER PLAN DEVELOPMENT OF —REGIONAL IMPACT' - _ �r.� w. •rr. �..wr �rw 8 —84S 02 Is E A. Describe existing air quality. monitoring programs, and trends. Include monitor locations, type of equipmornt used, and pollutants monitored; and specify the effectiveness of existing air quality monitoring programs, Specify whether or not additional development in the area will cause exceedance of air quality standards. Include pollutants monitored on a macro level outside the study boundary in the description of existing and future conditions (e.g., ozone monitoring on Virginia Key). Identify any additional actions or facilities needed to properly monitor and abate the impact of exiting and proposed development on air quality. I. Congress enacted amendments to The Clean Air Act in 1970. These amendments required the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to promulgate national ambient air quality standards for known air pollutants. In 1971s. EPA promulgated primary and secondary ambient air quality i standards for six criteria air pollutants. National primary standards were designed to protect the public health, whereas► secondary standards were designed to protect public welfare. Since the initial promulgation of air quality standards, standards for hydrocarbons were rescinded and standards for lead adopted. The six criteria air pollutants and their respective standards are shown in Table 4.1. The United States Environmental Protection Agency has the ultimate responsibility for clean air. To achieve the goal of clean air, EPA has required each state through a process known as the, State Implementation Plan (SIP) to devise a plan to protect the air quality resource. The agency responsible for implementing the SIP in Florida is the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER). - The SIP is a plan which sets forth the procedures and regulations necessary to attain and maintain ambient air quality standards. The standards adopted by Florida are the national secondary ambient air quality standards, which are the more restrictive standards. To assist the FDER in maintaining air quality standards, the state has entered into inter -local agreements with municipalities to allow local agencies to act as an arm of the state. The Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERO has entered into agreement with the HER and is the local air pollution control agency responsib ie for the enforcement of air quality regulations in Dade county and monitoring of the six criteria air pollutants. ' 1 I_, M, 1 ! ♦: R: Y� Exhibited in Figures 4.1 thru 4.6 is the location of each air monitoring site operated by DERM. For consistency, site numbers coincide with Dade county station numbers. Table 4.2 lists the address of each monitoring site. t 0 0 TABLE 4.1 NATIONAL PRIMARY AND SECONDARY AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS A. National PrSmary Standards J= Wfur Dioxide 80 micrograms per cubic meter - annual arithmetic mean. 365 micrograms per cubic meter - maximum 24-hour concentration not to be exceeded more than once per year. ; B. Natfonai §g=nAaXv Standard = SUI_f= Dioxide 1300 micrograms per cubic meter - maximum 3-hour concentration not to be exceeded more than once per year. a 260 micrograms per cubic meter - maximum 24-hour concentration not to be exceeded more than once per year. -60 micrograms per cubic meter annual- arithmetic mean. C. NationalPrimaryPr� Standards, IQt. Particulate Matt L 75 micrograms per cubic meter annual geometric mean. r 260 micrograms per cubic meter - maximum 24-hour concentration not to be exceeded more than once per year. D. Standards � Secondary J= Particulate r -6G _1crograms per cubic meter annual geometric mean. 150 micrograms per cubic meter - maximum 24-hour concantration not to be exceeded more than once per year. E. National Primary ADd Secondary Standards .fin Wngxide f � f -10 milligrams per cubic meter - maximum 8-hour concentration not to be exceeded more than once per yea-. e 40 milligrams per cubic meter - max....wa 1-hour concentration not to be exceeded more than once per year. TABLE 4.1 (CONTINLIED) F . National PrIMILM ARd SgCgjjdAj:)[ SjAnjsUA f= Qtone 235 micrograms per cubic meter - maximum 1-hour concentration. G. &U=Al gdnizy W %=4u-y- 5WAArA fg-c KII=ga Dioxide 100 micrograms pGi ;ubic meter annual arithmetric mean. H. Natignal EdDAr-x Aad u-y- 2wAml 1= UAI 1.5 micrograms per cubic meter - maximum arithimetric mean averaged over a calendar quarter. ;IL Dade county's ambient air monitoring network meets EPAls network design criteria for State and Local Air Monitoring Stations (SLAMS) and National Air Monitoring Stations (NAMIS), as well as, probe siting criteria for ambient air quality monitoring. Dade county uses either federal reference or equivalent methods to monitor air pollution levels. A quality assurance ( gram has been implemented to validate the reliability of air monitoring data generated by DERM, Dade county follows the FDER's Cuality Assurance Plan and is audited annually by the state to ensure that the air monitoring network has been operated in accordance with standard operating procedures. r Ambient air quality data generated by DERM is validated by the FDER prior to submittal to the state data bank and ultimately to the national data storage and retrieval system. Air quality data developed for this report is prepared from the status ALSUM statistical report. Tables 4.3 thru 4.8 _ summarize Dade county's air quality for the years 1983, 1984, and 1985. A. Particulate Matt r Table 4.3 summarizes Dade county's TSP air quality data. There appears to be no dramatic changes in particulate concentrations over the past three years. The differences in concentration could be attributed to year to year variations in meteorology and local conditions. The exceedance of the 24-hour standard in 1985 at Station 32 can be attributed to a muck fire in the northwest portion of the county. The — cause of the exceedance of the 24-hour standard at Station ­10 -is undetermined at this time. Because neither station exceeded the 24-hour standard twice, a violation of the 24-hour TSP standard has not occurred in 1985. The exceedance of the annual geometric mean standard at Station 34 is a violation of the itate rtandard. The cause for consistently high values at this site is due to local construction activi" When construction is complete, particulate concentrations will probably return to pre - construction levels of 40 to 50 micrograms per cubic meter. The high annual geometric mean measured at Station 38, which is the only TSP air monitoring station within the City of Miami* is based on nine months (April -December) of data. Therefore, no violation of the annual standard has been recorded. The reason for consistently high concentrations at this site has not been determined to date. The existing TSP network (Figure 4.1) meets the design criteria for SLAMS and NAME. The network is adequate to monitor particulate concentration trends in Dade county. However, the TSP network should be expanded to include one site in the central business district of Miami for trend analysis. B. LW Table 4.4 summarizes lead levels in Dade county. There have been no 4-4 8 TABLE 4.2 AIR MONITORING STATION LOCATION Station Addrgss 1 10-2700-002 864 N.W. 23 rd Street 10 10-0860-001 6400 N.W. 27th Avenue 11 10-1760-001 251 E. 47th Street (Hialeah) is 10-2720-007 2100 Washington Avenue .(Miami Beach) 23 10-1880-001 325 N.W. 2nd Street (Homestead) 24 10-3040-001 17011 N.E. 19th Avenue (N. Miami Beach) 31 10-3560-002 9201 S.W. 152 Street (Perrino) • 32 10-0660-020 7050 N.W. 36th Street 33 10-0860-022 6135 S.W. 66th Street 34 10-0860-019 S.R. 821 and U.S. 27 (Pennsuco) 35 .. 10-0860-021 Tho"son Park is 36 10-0860-023 Virginia Key 36A 10-0860-027 Rosenstiel School 38 10-2700-016 1200 N.W. 20th Street 41 10-2700-019 2201 S.W. 4th Street 10-2700-018 101 E. Flagler Street 44 10-0860-024 S.R. 826 & S.W. 4th Street — 45 10-0860-025 S.W. 104th Street U.S. 1 46 10-Z700�020 2121 N.W. 21st Street 49 10-0860-028 Haulover Beach - - SO 10-0860-029 Perdue Medical Center — f _A exceedances of the lead standard for the past three years. The trend in lead concentrations for Dade county appears to be a county- wide decrease. The most dramatic reduction has occured at Station 44. In 1983, the maximum concentration is 1.4 micrograms per cubic meter, whereas, the maximum concentration in 1985 is 0.6 micrograms per cubic motor. Because the automobile is the major source of lead in Dade county, it is generally believed that the reduction in ardent lead levels can be �— attributed to the phasing -out of leaded gasoline. _ The existing lead network (Figure 4.2) meets the design criteria for SLAMS and HAMS. The network is adequate to monitor lead concentrations in Dade county. However, the lead network should be expanded to include one site in the central business district of Miami for trend analysis. C. Table 4.5 summarizes sulfur dioxide concentrations in Dade county. There have been no exceedances of the sulfur dioxide standards for the past three years. The trend appears to be a small reduction in ambient sulfur dioxide levels. However, the lower concentrations measured in 1985 could be due to variations in meteorology. The existing sulfur dioxide network (Figure 4.3) meets the design criteria for SLAMS and HAMS. The network is adequate to monitor sulfur dioxide concentrations in Dade county and the City of Miami. The network should not be expanded unless new major point sources of sulfur dioxide locate in Dade county. 'D. Nitrogen Dioxide Table 4.6 summarizes nitrogen dioxide concentrations in Dade county. There have been no exceedances of the nitrogen dioxide standard for the past three years. The trend appears to be a reduction in ambient nitrogen dioxide levels. Decreases in nitrogen dioxide concentrations could be attributed to iarproved emissions controls on automobiles. 0 The existing nitrogen dioxide network (Figure 4.4) meets the design criteria for SLAMS and HAMS. The network is adequate to monitor nitrogen dioxide concentrations in Dade county and the City of Miami. The network should not be expanded as it would not be a cost-effective expenditure of government funds. Table 4.7 summarizes ozone levels in Dade county. There have been no violations of the ozone standard from 1983 through 1985. Howevers if either station 36A or 50 measures an exceedance of the .12 parts per million standard in 1986, then Dade county will be r&-designated a nonattainment area for ozone. In 1979, Dade county was declared a nonattainment area for ozone by EPA. As a result of that designation. Dade county was required to submit a revision to the State Implementation Plan to show how they would attain and maintain the ozone standard by 1982. Through point source emissions controls, as well as, implementing transportation control measures, such as, exclusive bus and carpool lanes, park and ride fringe lots, doubling the bus fleet and adding auto -free zones, Dade county was able to achieve and maintain the standard through 1984. However, it appears that Dade county will again be designated nonattainmQnt for ozone. At this point. DEW is waiting until the end of 1986 to determine their compliance status. Additional traffic generated by development will increase hydrocarbon emissions, which ,are precursors for ozone formation. Since ozone is an area -wide problem, irplementation of county -wide transportation control measurest such as, a vehicle inspection and maintenance program, additional expressways, and improved public transit will be necessary to abate elevated levels of ozone. Traffic flow improvements that coincide with major development will provide only small reductions in area -wide hydrocarbon emissions. The primary benefit of widening roadways, improving intersections, and adding traffic signals in the primary impact area of a development is mitigation of carbon monoxide hot spots. The existing ozone network (Figure 4.5) meets the design criteria for SLAMS and WS. The network is adequate to monitor ozone concentrations in Dade county and the City of Miami. F. Carbon Mpnoxide Table 4.8 summarizes carbon monoxide levels in Dade county. In the last three years, two monitoring sites. Stations 41 and 42, have recorded violations of the eight -hour standard. Station 41 is a neighborhood scale site which monitors carbon levels in a central county population center. The objective of this site is to measure representative carbon monoxide levels in an area of high population density. Station 42 is a microscale site, which monitors carbon monoxide levels adjacent to an intersection in downtown Miami. The objective of this site is to determine carbon monoxide maxima for Dade county. There are two trends in the carbon monoxide data. Carbon monoxide levels at the Flagler Street site in downtown Miami, Station 42, are decreasing, whereas, the carbon monoxide levels at Station 41 are increasing. t The Flagler Street site has been studied in detail by the state and is considered a worse -case hot spot location for the central business district of Miami. The conclusion of the stt:dy is that the monitoring site will show compliance with air quality standards by the 1987 EPA mandated deadline. As of the end of 1985, Station 42 has achieved compliance with state air quality standards. The reasons sited for early compliance are decrease in traffic conjestion because of completion of construction in downtown Miami, synchronization of traffic signals along Flagler Street, moving the bus stop from directly in front of the probe, and completion of the people - mover. A SIP revision is being prepared by the state and county to show how carbon monoxide standards will be attained and maintained in downtown Miami. 7W 9 The exceedances measured at Station 41 differ from the exceedances measured at the Flagler Street site in that Station 41 measured elevated carbon monoxide concentrations at night, whereas► Station 42 exceedances occurred in the daytime and are associated with peak eight -hour traffic. The nightime exceedances occur during nocturnal inversions and are heavily influenced by high background carbon monoxide values. /area -wide transportation control measures, such as, a vehicle inspection and maintenance program, car and vanpool programs, and additional expressways are probably necessary to prevent future nightime exceedances from occurring at Station 41. Local traffic flow improvements will do very little to mitigate carbon monoxide levels below standards at this site. Planned development for the city of Miami could cause violations of carbon monoxide standards. Without goad planning and the implementation of traffic flow improvements at carbon monoxide hot spots, developmental growth could adversely impact air quality. The existing carbon monoxide network (Figure 4.6) wets the design criteria for SLAMS and NAMS. However, the network is not adequate to monitor neighborhood or microscale trends for the entire county. Two existing neighborhood scale sites, Stations 1 and 44, should be relocated to new growth centers in the Southwest and Northwest portions of the county. Several additional microscale sites are needed to adequately characterize maximum ambient carbon monoxide levels throughout Dade county. 4-8 U Coate Dead rkow— And AS&*" a kft &www KimAht YMi. MG *Ago .YMgM Yw� ovv��awN�' MASTERPLAN D. DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL EMPACT TABLE 4.3 ANNUAL TSP CONCENMTICNS MICROGRAMSICUBIC METER 12$3 t o84 19i 24-hr. Maxima Goo. 24-hr. Maxima Goo. 24-hr. Maxima Geo. Station No. 1st 2nd Mean 1st 2nd Mean 1st 2nd Mean M 10 97 96 56 88 84 49 161-- 122 56 11 89 83 46 84 8o 46 109 97 50 15 123 86 38 74 70 40 s a 23 130 88 44 86 82 4S 121 77 47 24 138 84 40 7S 71 39 95 79 39 31 67 63 34 84 6S 36 32 141 108 So 104 89 s0 212-- 118 S2 ' 33 141 106 46 111 78 4S 60 60 38 34 130 79 40 113 111 48 131 124 61 35 124 63 27 S6 So 27 70 64 31 sa 38 * s a 116 107 73 - 4S 123 76 3S 69 6S 37 64 60 36 46 148 103 48 86 86 So 87 85 Sl s *�r -Nat available - Exceedance of standard pA.� Mvrrrr, And A.ccoa+ca InG Bti:r.�:.6i. Y(as4 Aral Ywm. Yx. Wry-iurssr Awi .MwwacA Mi 6M 6�4+�W Co�artWs. MC. DOWNTOWN MASTERPLAN DEVEL0P1 --NT OF REGIONAL IMPACT �� , i� I I lilldll II TABLE 4.4 QUARTERLY LEAD CONCENTRATIONS MICROGRAMS/CUBIC METER 14� , 14fl4 14@� Quarter Quarter Quarter Station No, I II III IV I II III IV I II III IV 10 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 11 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 15 0.2- 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 23 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 24 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 31 * * * 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 32 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 33 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 34 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 35 0.1 0.1 0.1 U.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 38 * * * * * * * 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 44 0.8 1.2 1.3 1.4 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 45 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 $ 46 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 ,, t available °I+ i Il 0 El 010 O�.id NNwww AfA Asso"jI rrw Kuw Ans Y«a qc aw Jew led Ar"amrMd a DOWNTOWN MASTERPLAN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT TABLE 4.5 ANNUAL SULFUR DIOXIDE CONCENTRATIONS MICROGRAMS/CUBIC METER 12�3 1904 nn Maxima Maxima Maxima Station No. 3-Hour 24-Hour Arth. 3-Hour 24-Hour Arth. 1st 2na 1st 2nd Mean lst 2nd lst 2nd Mean 3-Hour 24-Hour lst 2nd Arth. lst 2nd Mean 1 26 26 25 23 6 35 31 19 17 6 22 17 12 11 3 El pSvW ft,mvw And waaonaf*L inG way++ Kv.l And v0,461W Wmww.4%0&w Me jwvmn &Z ammommoM L*#--9 CnwttaNa inC t [DOWNTOWN •MASTERPLAN t DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT �Illl�illll TABLE 4.6 ANNUAL NITROGEN DIOXIDE CONCENTRATIONS MICROGRAMS/CUBIC METER- .1m Im im Station No. Arith. Mean Arith. Mean Arith. Mean 1 42 35 31 tai r� pW,md DOWNTOWN MASTERPLAN DEVELOPMENT CP REGIONAL IMPACT E TABLE 4.7 ANNUAL OZONE CONCENTRATIONS PARTSlMILLION 19-OA 1985 j 1-hr. Maxima No. of 1-hr. Maxima No. of 1-hr. Maxima No. of Ij Station No. 1st 2nd Exceed. 1st 2nd Exceed. 1st 2nd E-�»x�ceed. 35 .115 .095 0 .090 .085 0 .106 .105 0 36 .110 .110 0 .110 .095 0 ......... co- - f OOOF a _ .. Figure 4.6 --------------- a+w pyneown Md A..00sl.. MC "ki And Vsr► W- DOWNTOWN741WMASYERPLAN pEJELOPMEPIi OF FEGIOWAL IMPACT �; , .,,.�.....�.�..-.�-�-- _.. _ ...1 _i -]J II 1 Ilill014l1l 11IIIII11111 hi6V V .. I I , : ,'I I I I' . !, I I V..uVl,l. I'�IIIJ� TABLE 4.8 ANNUAL CARBON MONOXIDE CONMETRATIONS MILLIGRAMS/CUBIC METER 1�3 1984 146.i Maxima Maxima Maxima 1-Hour 8-Hour Exceed, 1-Hour 8-Hour Exceed. 1-Hour 8-Hour Exceed, Station No. 1st 2nd 1st 2nd 8-Hour 1st 2nd 19t 2nd 8-Hour 1st 2nd 1st 2nd 8-Hour 1 17 16 9 8 0 18 18 15 9 1 20 17 9 8 0 41 23 21 11 10 1 22 22 17 10 1 30 23 15 11 2 42 24 21 14 13 13 17 17 12 11 3 14 14 12 10 1 44 17 16 8 7 0 14 13 10 7 0 17 17 8 8 0 Ire I'Irl uJ rici'lrpar I r. upj I I! u Ill I"I I lj! In ItI,IPI14ill11 ip1,1119P''I. g• Specify the structural and operation conditions that should be included in all development orders to minimize air quality impacts; and specify what additional action will be taken, and by whom, if an exceedance(s) of air quality standards occurs. The objectives of this methodology are to eliminate unnecessary air quality analyses, allow developrntal growth for the city of Miami, and prevent deterioration of Miamirs air quality resource beyond state ambient air quality standards. Presently, the Regional Planning Council requires an air quality impact analysis of each iADA/DRI using FDER's Intgrim Guidance laL Eval uat i na Air Dual ity InAA= 9 I.Rsii rQQ1 SQUL= a Carbon Monoxide fissions. As stated by FDER, these guidelines are a guiding tool and that deviations from the guidelines are acceptable provided that there is good technical justification for those deviations. The analysis methodology described below will deviate from the interim guidance. Many of the modeling assumptions and dispersion models specified by FDER have not been validated. In addition, there is strong disagreement in receptor location. Further justification for not adhering to the interim guidance will be provided in subsequent sections of this report. The analysis procedures specified in the interim guidance are very conservative. Implementation of needless and costly transportation control measures will occur unless changes are made to the guidance. In addition, if left unchanged, the interim guidance could ultimately lead to denial of a project that does not adversely impact air quality. The major difference between the interim guidelines and the methodology described herein is the use of air monitoring data to determine compliance with air quality standards. A carbon monoxide threshold concentration is proposed to determine if an air quality Impact analysis should be required of the developer. If a pre- determined threshold value has been exceeded, then validated line source models would be Toyed to analyze key intersections and roadways. Parking garages and surface lots would not be included in the analysis unless reliable area source models are available to analyze parking facilities. The above methodology is recommended for Phase I (1986-1990). If the methodology is determined to be inadequate, then modifications can be made to the procedures in subsequent phase submittals. The city has been divided into four separate planning areas. The four areas are; Omni, Southeast Overtown/Park West, Central Business District, and Brickell (See Figure 4.7). The Southeast Overtown/Park West area will be omitted from this DRI application, however, it will be addressed in a separate report. 4-M EE 5 9 Ad A.-CW#& wa .«.w+. "$A a w v..a :.a. tWW—wfi .sw AAd we &*. W" ca Wft"" as I ��NTOVJN C ASTERPLAN OV DEVELOPMENT OF FiEG1ONAL IMPACT The existing Dade county carbon monoxide monitoring network would have to be expanded to adequately measure carbon monoxide maxima in each of the planning areas described above. One microscale monitoring site for each area Mould be sufficient to characterize maximum carbon monoxide levels and provide verification of compliance with a threshold concentration. Each monitoring site would adhere to EPA probe siting criteria for microscale sites, and selection of worse -case locations would be based on intersection geometry, traffic volumes, level of service, area source emissions strengths, availability of space for an air monitoring station, and developmental density. Each area would have one monitoring site that would measure maximum carbon levels for that area. A threshold concentration of 8.0 milligrams per cubic meter for an eight -hour average would be used to determine if further analysis is required of developers wanting to build in a particular area. If the threshold concentration of 8.0 milligrams per cubic meter has been exceeded during the last maximum carbon monoxide monitoring period (December thru February), then developers applying for a Major Use Special Permit would be required to conduct further analyzes using a modified version of FDER's interim guidance. If the threshold con^.antration has not been exceeded, then no further analysis would be required of the developer. The developer would simply make a statement in the Major Use Special Permit application that carbon monoxide levels for that particular area are less than or equal to the threshold concentration and the proposed development will not adversely impact the air quality. If the impact analysis did show exceedances of the standards, then the city would not issue a permit until the developer could show compliance with state air quality standards. The developer would have to analyze and commit to implementing the necessary tranportation control measures to eliminate the carbon monoxide hot spot(s). There are several advantages to using a threshold concentration as a screening method to determine compliance with air quality standards. One, empirical data is used to show compliance with standards rather than predictive models. Two, a margin of safety is provided with a 8.0 milligrams per cubic meter threshold concentration, and three, it will reduce the number of air quality analyzes required of developers. Each major development project by itself will not have a significant impact on the residual area -wide background carbon mon(Aide concentration or the immediate upwind background concentration. The greatest concern of each large scale development is its ability 'to create carbon monoxide hot spots at nearby intersections. The probability that a major development would occur near the worse - case monitoring site is very low because of existing development density. However, if the decision was made to build at this location, then it is highly unlikely that the traffic generated by the project 9 would cause a violation of standard if existing maximum carbon 4.23 SG-849 monoxide levels are 8.0 milligrams per cubic meter or less. All streets and intersections in downtown Miami are required to most certain accepted levels of service. If project traffic were predicted to cause conjestion and reduce the level of service along the roadway system, then traffic flow improvements would have to be committed to by the deve' ;er to bring the level of service back to minimum standards, thereby, minimizing the impacts upon air duality. An argument might be made that the air monitoring station provides empirical data for the present year, but does not provide information as to what the carbon monoxide levels will be in the future. The air monitoring station will provide data on a continuous basis. Once the threshold concentration is reached, the air quality impact analysis procedure will be implemented and predict"ns of future concentrations made for each analysis. In addition, giuwth in background traffic emissions will be offset by reductions in tail pipe emissions mandated by the FMVCP. The fact is that existing modeling techniques predict lover carbon monoxide levels for the future. Another argument might be made that the growth rate will out -strip mandated tail pipe reductions. In the past, with sprawling uncontrolled growth, that might have been the case. However, the mechanism is in place to prevent rapid unplanned growth. Infrastructure must be compatible with growth. III. Recommended Modifications 1DfXB interim igidanee A. Parking facilities, such as, multi -level garages and surface lots, should not be included in the impact analysis until validated atmospheric dispersion models are available that take into account aerodynamic effects from the parking facility Itself and/or surrounding structures. B. Receptors locations used in predictive modeling should be located at centerline of sidewalk snd other reasonable locations where hutr:an exposure .nay occur. C. A sidewalk averaging technique should be used to calculate sidewalk centerline carbon monoxide concentrations. . D. Determination of exceedances of standards must be consistent with time periods of human exposure to ambient carbon monoxide concentrations. E. Analysis of air quality impacts should be for each phase of the project ind build --out. IV. Rationale Far Modifications .� f �'� Guidance i - A. The current FDFR recommended model for analysis of parking facilities is PAL. PAL has not been validated for this application. The model does not compensate for mechanical turbulance caused by the parking structure Itself or adjacent buildings. Although dispersion modeling has become an accepted technique for analyzing impacts from air pollution sources, this 13G-85 4-24 is a mis-application of PAL. In all probability, this model over -predicts the true impact of a parking facility on ambient carbon monoxide levels. It would be prudent for FDER to validate PAL before making it a standard method of analysis. Be At intersections, FDER requires receptors to be located six meters from edge of pavement and ten rioters from the cross - street. In an urban environment, six meters from edge of pavement usually is not centerline of sidewalk. Air quality standards are designed to protect human health, therefore, receptor locations should be located where human exposure occurs. C. When analyzing sidewalk carbon monoxide concentrations, receptors should be located at the intersection, as well as, mid -block. To determine a maximum carbon monoxide concentration along a sidewalk, a weighed average should be calculated based on time spent at both intersections and mid -block. D. Carbon monoxide pollution does not cause welfare effects, such as, soiling, odor, and vegetative damage, therefore, application of the carbon monoxide standards to receptor locations should be consistent with time periods of human exposure to measure health effects. The one -hour standard should be applied to sidewalk receptor locations and the eight -hour standard should be applied to receptors located in parks and at residences. Street vendors and the like should be viewed the same as traffic police and toll booth attendants, where exposure to elevated levels of carbon monoxide are an occupational hazard. E. Presently, FDER requires the year 2000 to be analyzed, as well as, each phase of the project. The year 2000 analysis is unnecessary for a couple of reasons. One, the traffic volumes calculated for greater than five years from the present are at best a gross aporoximattion. Therefore, modeling results based on these numbers would also be an approximation of carbon monoxide levels. Secondly, future predictions of carbon monoxide concentrations are always lower than near future conditions. Therefore, if Phase I shows compliance, then we knew that year 2000 will also show compliance. 4-3 C. Specify regulatory and permitting changes and/or restrictive covenants needed to minimize adverse air quality impacts, ensure that abatement measures described in B. are implemented, and ensure that ambient air quality standards are not exceeded. Three monitoring sites are recommended for the carbon monoxide monitoring program. One site for the Brickell Areas one site for the Omni Area, and one site for the Central Business District (CBD) Area. These sites would not have to be implemented immediately. Air monitoring stations could be phased in one year prior to the first Major Use Special Permit applications for that area. The CBD area has an existing worse -case microscale carbon monoxide monitoring site operated by DEFER. This site is located at 101 East Flagler Street and is adequate to characterize maximum carbon monoxide levels in the CBO. The other two areas do not have an existing worse - case monitoring site. The locations of these sites should be determined when final economic and traffic studies have been completed for the city. In addition, determination of site locations should be made in cooperation with D€RM. Installation of the monitoring stations should be handled by an outside contractor to expedite the implementation of the program. Since Dade county has an EPA approved air pollution control program, operation of the two additional carbon monoxide sites by DEFN would be the most cost-effective solution to network operation. In addition, data collection would be consistent with the state quality assurance plan and standard operating procedures. Review of impact analyzes for Major Use Special Permits would require the expertise of a mobile source engineer. The most cost-effective solution for review of air quality analyzes is to have GERM perform application review for compliance with state air quality standards. The advantages to allowing DERM provide these services are; an outside agency would be reviewing the technical adequacy of the analysis, DERM is privy to the latest technical up -dates in mobile source control technology, and DERM 1s the local expert in air pollution control. To operate the monitoring and impact analysis review programs requires the services of two personnel. The monitoring program needs a senior enginaering technician and the review program requires a mobile source engineer. FFIEff ' ,.+ u ; s The budget estimates provided below are for both the air monitoring and impact review programs. 4-26 849 A. JXMt Revier pg® 1. Salary and Benefits (1/4 man-year) 2. Computer and Software 3. Furniture and Supplies 4. Phone S. Office Rental 6. Seminars and Travel Expenses 7. Publications and Memberships Capital .Costs Annual $ 91000.00 $ 50000.00 S 2#000.00 $ 500.00 Subtotal - $17,500.00 B. AIZ Monitoring PrA ram ,(Two Sites) 1. Salary and Benefits (1/4 man-year) 2. Analyzers (2) $17*000.00 3. Calibrators (2) $148000.00 4. Data loggers (2) $100000.00 S. Recorders (2) $ S1000.00 6. Misc. Supplies, Expenses and Equipment $10#000.00 7. Annual Operating Expenses: Electric, rent, telephone and supplies 8. System fabrication, installation, and ' initial operation by contractor (3-6 months) $20400.00 9. Site Selection (Consultant) $ 3,500.00 S 500.00 $ 10200.00 $ 10000.00 $ 21000.00 $ 500.00 ---------- $14,200.00 S 61000.00 $ 6.000.00 Subtotal - $79,000.00 S12400.00 • Total = $86#500.00 $26,200.00 III. Sources 9f funding There are four sources of funding for a project of this nature: United States Environmental Protection Agency (Federal Government), automobile registration fee, Major Use Special Permit foes, and existing development orders that . equi re developers to implement air monitoring stations. It is unlikely that EPA will fund a city air monitoring program o provide additional funding for the county air program. EPA+s policy 4-27 for last five years has been to reduce their grant funds and require the state and local programs to maintain there existing level of service through state and local revenues. However, the city►s grant resource department could research other federal grants to determine if they are applicable to the proposed program. Several years ago the state legislated a $0.50 air pollution tax to each automobile registration. The county is currently funding its mobile source program with these monies. There is the possibility that the county could fund either all or part of the air monitoring and impact analysis review programs with the tag registration fee monies. The city could assess each Major Use Special Permit applicant with an air pollution fee. The fee should be based on the number of parking spaces required for the project and/or the number vehicle trips generated by the project. Monies, which have been committed by existing development projects for carbon monoxide monitoring should be diverted to the city to help fund the proposed program. The city of Miami should = adopt by ordinance carbon monoxide ambient air quality standards. The State of Florida has adopted national standards as state air quality standards and has the responsibility for attainment and maintenance of those standards. DERM is an arm of the state and has the responsibility for enforcement of those standards in Dade county. The city should adopt an ordinance stating that each developer requiring a Major Special Use Permit would not be allowed to Impact ambient carbon monoxide levels above state ambient air quality standards. The ordinance should also require that each applicant analyze their project and, if necessary, mitigate adverse air quality impacts with transportation control measures to show compliance with existing state air quality standards. In addition to an ordinance, the city should enter into an inter -local agreement with the county specifying responsibilites for air monitoring and application review. This agreement should also delineate funding responsibilities, as well as, administrative responsibilities. I OBJECTIVES The objectives of the water quality element of this report are to identify as far as possible from available sources, the existing water quality of the Biscayne Aquifer and Biscayne Bay in the study area. Utilizing existing information and the best scientific and engineering data available, the next task is to define the water quality characteristics of stormwater in the study area. Estimates of the amount of pollutants being discharged annually to both the aquifer and the bay are to be made. Using this as a baseline, the next task is to project into the future and forecast the stormwater and pollutant loads to be expected in Phase I, II and III. These estimates are to be based on the projected land use growth scenarios and the regulatory framework within which future development will take place. Other non-stormwater discharges are to be identified and discussed. A water quality plan and program is to be outlined which will demonstrate how the stormwater runoff impacts can be mitigated or eliminated. A monitoring • system is to be proposed to insure water quality goals are being met and the estimated cost of this monitoring program defined. This plan may also suggest regulatory and infrastructure changes which may be necessary to insure that the water quality of the planning area is improved. A. EXISTING CONDITIONS 1. DESCRIBE THE COMPOSITION AND QUANTITY OF RUNOFF CURRENTLY BEING DIRECTLY DISCHARGED TO ANY SURFACE WATER BODY OR THE- BISCAYNE AQUIFER. ALSO, DESCRIBE ANY-STORMMATER MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS DUE TO EXISTING SOILS OR HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS: COMPOSITION AND QUANTITY OF RUNOFF Stormsrater runoff is generally known to contain contaminants in ► varying concentrations. The amount of contaminants is a function of the type of surface coverage producing the runoff and the nature of activities which have .left residues on impervious areas that can be carried by flowing water. r' The contaminants are the residuals of the following activities. 1. Street surface deterioration. 2. Motor Vehicle Baste (Fuels, lubricants, fluids, coolants, tire and brake particlesa exhaust emissions, collision scrap, dirt and fist.) 3. Careless public and private solid waste collection. 4. Atmospheric fallout. 111 S. Vegetative droppings (Including leaves• Grass, pesticides). 6. Animal and bird droppings. 7. Particles from windblown dirt. 8. Soil from erosion of land surfaces. 9. Construction debris. Source: Sartor, et al 1972, Lazaro 1979 herbicides and The amount of the material carried in the runoff is also determined by street cleaning practices, street slopes# the intensity and duration of rainfall, the season and the time elapsed from the last rainfall event. It is estimated that 9O% of the surface pollutants are removed by runoff in the first 0.5 hour of a storm event of 1.0 in/hr intensity (Overton and Meadows). Many studies have been performed around the country in urban settings to determine the constituents of urban runoff. A selection of the results from some of the most pertinent studies appears in Exhibit 5-1. These pollutant load concentrations are based on lbs/acre/day as a means of comparing the differing areas and land uses. The chief task herein is to select those studies most closely allied to the project study area in function and characteristics to best deterrine the stormwater runoff load. The loadings estimated for the downtown area shown in .Exhibit 5-2 are selected from studies in Tampa, Fort Lauderdale and Miami. The parameters selected are based on availability of data and the concern for impact of these pollutants in the Miami River and Biscayne Bay. The existing land use and area is shown in Exhibit 5-3. Existing and projected pollutants loads by sub -district are shown for Existing, Phase I, Phase II and Phase III in Exhibits 5-4, 5-S, 5-6 and 5-7 respectively. Water laden with these pollutants could be expected to produce intense, short term water quality violations at the outfall. Zones of reasonable mixing have not been established for these outfalls, yet good circulation and tidal flushing provide dilution of these contaminants. The predominant mode of runoff disposal is through positive outfall drainage to surface waters. Approximately, 40% the study area runoff flows to the Miami River and about 60% to Biscayne Bay. Map G indicates the major drainage outfalls to surface waters. Some projects in the study area that have undergone development or redevelopment since 1980 have had to meet now design standards for stormwater runoff and these projects have minimal effect on the surrounding surface waters. These developments collect stormwater and discharge, as a minimum* the first inch of runoff to on -site drainage wells. In addition, sou streets have been retrofitted with sub -surface exfiltration systems which divert street flow to the water table aquifer for attenuation of surface water pollutant discharge. Approximately 13% of the study area flows to the various depths of the Biscayne Aquifer in 1986. By Phase III it is estimated that 72% will be directed to the aquifer. See Exhibits 5-4 through 5-7. There is a high water table in the study area which inhibits percolation as a means of total stormwater runoff disposal. The design rainfall accumulation of CO inches per year is significant and forces development to augment percolation systems with underdrain facilities or drainage wells. . z e I 0 �111/ftm. AIW A - ..I- A Im. A.JVwaL&r. .-W"f*-fWiaA And k*V*kA UL' bo*wtn.�mg biWmw*V C.W"am#. W.L MAP G-1 EXISTING DRAINAGE DOWNTOWN MASTERPLAN ire'' a DEVELOPMENT OF.REGIONAL IMPACT ii i i 9 ii i • V rr r • • r • v �. M � • • � •r . • r . • r t • •. . • r .. .. .. . � .. • • • ui. fir • • • • r • • DwW Ph~ Aa/ AAsoowlM M& fww"a KwW /M® Vw lao Ard JWw4wL U& &&*ewes" GmWo p Co wAtsn . M. , DOWNTOWN JA TER PLAN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT FIGURE 5-2 SG '849 I QUESTION 5: WATER QUALITY/DRAINAGE A. DESCRIBE ANY STORM WATER MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS DUE TO EXISTING SOIL OR HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS. Based on recent soil borings, percolation tests and other geotechnical studies conducted by local soils engineering and testing firms, there are no subsurface conditions throughout the study area which should pose any unusual limitations or constraints to storm water management and de- velopment. The subsurface materials encountered throughout the study area are consistent with South Florida's geologic environment and are similar to those encountered throughout the Miami area as discussed below: Dade County is located on the southern flank of a stable carbonate platform on which thick deposits of limestones, dolomites and evaporites have accumulated. The upper two hundred feet of the soil profile is composed predominately of limestone and quartz sand. These sediments were deposited during several glacial and interglacial stages when the ocean was at elevations higher than present. Florida can be divided into two geologic provinces - the Central Highlands and the Coastal Lowlands. The Coastal Lowlands encompass all of South Florida and consist of plains representing marine terraces which have been modified by erosion. The coastal lowlands can be further subdivided into regions called Everglades, the Big Cypress Swamp, The Mangrove and Coastal Glades, the Sandy Flatlands and the Atlantic Coastal Ridge. The Atlantic Coastal Ridge and the Sandy Flatlands represent the majority of ,the Miami area. The Atlantic Coastal Ridge approximates U.S. High- way #1 or a high elevation ridge. The Sandy Flatlands are bordered by the Atlantic Coastal Ridge vn the east and by the Everglades on the south and the west. In many portions of Dade County, �•rface sand deposits of the Pamlico Formation are encounterec. The Pamlico sands have a thick- ness of two to five feet and overlie the Miami Limestone. The Miami Limestone is a soft to moderately hard, white, porous to very porous, sometimes sandy, oolitic calcareous dented grainstone. The Miami Limestone outcrops in portions of Dade County. The Miami Limestone has a maximum thickness of about 35 feet along the Atlantic Coastal Ridge and thins sharply near the coastline and it a westerly direction. The Miami limestone was formed about 130,000 years ago at a time when the sea level was twenty-five feet higher than it is today. This enviroment facilitated formation of concentrically � � f I layered sand sized carbonate grains called oolites. These grains formed by repeated precipitation of calcium carbonate around the nucleus of a sand or shell grain. The Miami Limestone can be separated.into two facies: the barrier bar oolitic facies and the tidal shoal limestone facies. The barrier bar facies is characterized by len�et of oolitic limestone separated by inten,,:ttent, one inch thick or less, uncemented sand layers (cross -bedded limestone). zones of higher porosity are characteristic and parallel to the bedding plains of the cross -bedded limestone. The tidal shoal limestone facies is characterized by a distinct lack of bedding planes. In addition, burrowing organisms have churned pre- viously deposited sediments, which has resulted in high porosity channels in the rock. These ancient channels give the rock an ap- pearance of a hardened sponge in some areas. The Miami Limestone is underlain by the Ft. Thompson Formation. The Ft. Thompson Formation includes sand, sandstone and limestone. The upper reaches of the Ft. Thompson Formation contain non -cemented sand. The Ft. Thompson Formation is wedge shaped, having a thick- ness of about sixty feet in the Miami area and thinning to a thick- ness of about ten feet in western Dade County. The top portions of the Ft. Thomson Formation consist of sand having a thickness ranging from five to twenty-five feet. The remainder of the formation con- sists of coralline limestone, quartz sandstone, sandy limestone and freshwater limestone. The type of material within the formation and the degree of cementation is variable with lateral extent and depth. Within the Dade County area the Ft. Thompson Formation is underlain by the Tamiami Formation. The Tamiami Formation consists of sands, silts and clays and sometimes fossiiiferous limestone. The upper portions of the Tamiami Formation are permeable and.make up the lower Biscayne Aquifer. This Formation ranges in thickness from zero to three hundred feet in South Florida. Throughout the study area the subsurface conditions may be sum- marized as consisting of five (5) geologic layers: Layer 1, Fill Soils - Surface soils to depths of one to 5 feet consists of silty fine to medium sand fill. Deposits of sand fill up to 10 feet. Layer 2, Miami Limestone Formation - Directly beneath the fill and persisting- to a apt about 25 feet is the Miami Limestone Forma- tion. The Miami Limestone (also known as Miami oolite) is a Pleisto- cene deposit which underlies much of southeast Florida. It is a soft, porous sandy to oo'°`ic carbonate rock which has been extensively solutioned. As a consequence of solutioning, the rock mass con- tains many sand filled vugs, small voids, and depressions. Layer 3 Fine to Medium Sand - Immediately underlying the Miami Limestone is a layer of fine to medium carbonate sand. The thickness of the sand layer varies from 2 to 10 feet. The sand is in a medium condition and contains shells and small limestone fragments. Layer 4. Fort Thompson Formation - Occurring below the carbonate sends is the limestone of the Fort Thompson Formation. The limestone of this formation varies from sandy to shelly and contains some dis- continuous sand filled zones, small voids and channels. It is a compact rock with unconfined compressive strengths near those of con- crete. The bottom of the Fort Thompson limestones is approximately 150 feet below grade. Lai er 5 Tamiami Formation - Beneath the Fort Thompson limestones lies the Tamiami Formation. In this area, the Tamiami Formation is composed of well -cemented sandstone. The Miami limestone provides adequate bearing capacity to shallow spread foundations or mats which support light to moderately heavy structural loads. For large to heavy structural loads, deep foundations established in the Fort Thompson Formation and consisting of driven piling or drilled cast in place caissons would be appropriate. Depending on the specific location, ground water will be generally found anywhere from 2 - 5 feet below existing grade. Due to the proximity to Biscayne Bay and resulting salt water intrusion problems, ground water throughout the study area is unfit for potable water supply. The study area is also outside the "cone -of -influence" of any existing or proposed well fields or other water supply sources. Consequently, developments within the study area will not present any significant effects on water quality or quantity. Nevertheless, it is critical that all development within the study area adhere to the following design/construction guidelines: 1. Any ground water encountered during construction must be filtered, as part of the dewatering process, prior to entering the City of Miami's storm sewer system. Y. All storm runoff from each completed development project must be retained on site. 3. It is recomended that runoff from impervious surfaces be col- lected in catch basins and routed by pipes to sedimentation boxes, from which injection pumps will discharge the runoff through drainage wells into the saline levels of the lower Biscayne Aquifer. 4. Any catch basin receiving water from parking areas inside a parking garage, must provide for oil and grease traps. 5. The drainage system described above must be designed to handle a 5 inch/hr. rainstorm intensity as per Dade County Public Works Manual (i.e. detail WC1.1). 6. Subgrade surfaces must be protected during construction through periodic sprinkling or wetting with water to avoid localized dust problems. 7. Soils and percolation tests prepared by soils engineering testing firms must accompany all building permit applications, wherever new construction is involved. The accompanying soils map illustrates the various soil formations and soil boring locations utilized as base data for this analysis. � i MAP E SOILS DOWNTOWN MASTERPLAN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT 86-849-, 2. DESCRIBE THE COMPOSITION AND SPECIFY THE QUANTITY OF ANY NON- STORMWATER DIS"RGES TO SURFACE WATER BODIES OR THE BISCAYNE AQUIFER. i COMPOSITION Of NONE-STO"ATER DISCHARGES The types of non-stormwater discharges to the stormwater conveyance system have been identified as follows: A. DgnAJVA�Qt:n D2xAtu_jtW: This intermittent contribution would have the predominant characteristics of the water table aquifer, typically this is fresh water comprised of surface runoff infiltration which mixes with the salt water aquifer underlying the downtown area. To the extent the water is pumped via street surface prior to discharge to the storm system it could contact and entrain residual components. However, after flushing and assuming continuous flow it would resume its groundwater characteristics. If erosion and turbidity controls are not taken suspended solids could be a significant component of this non®stormwater discharge. B. Fire HydrAnt Flushing: This process could be expected to produce generally high quality water with perhaps abnormal concentrations of iron and hardness due to scaling and decomposition of iron water distribution pipes. This 1s not considered a significant overall contribution. C. Street gaming: To the extent streets are purged of contaminants without retrieval by street cleaning operations, runoff from street washing can approximate the first flush concentrations of stormwater. 0. GarGarAge gashdown= This wastewater would have many of the characteristics of normal runoff from streets except that it could be expected to have more oil, grease and other drippage associated with parked cars. Building code requirements now dictate this waste to be discharged to the sanitary sewer. E. Cross Connections: Wastes from permitted and illegal discharges of sanitary and commericallindustrial waste to the stortmmater system must be considered as a possibility, however, documentation is difficult. Interconnection of stoma and sanitary sewers for highwater overflow is an ongoing national problem of older urbanized areas. The City of Miami Drainage Atlas indicate points where sanitary and storm lines join though these are to be phased out. Recent evidence from Schmidt and Spencer, 1986 indicate large municipal drainage systems may have far more point source discharges than would normally be expected. The direction of these non--stormvater discharges must be assumed to be predominately to the surface water. However, some isolated septic systems or seepage pits could be making discharges to the water table aquifer. • a. a QUESTION 5 - WATER QUALITY/DRAINAGE A. EXISTING CONDITIONS 2) DESCRIBE THE COWOSITION AND SPECIFY THE QUANTITY OF ANY NON-STORMWATER DISCHARGES TO SURFACE WATER BODIES OR THE BISCAYNE AQUIFER. QUANTITY OF NON-STORMWATER DISCHARGES TO SURFACE WATER BODIES OR THE BISCAYNE AQUIFER. Presently non-stormwater discharge to surface water bodies or the Biscayne Aquifer can be contributed to the following: A. Construction Dewater_i_n_g Discharge due to construction is a major contributor of non-starmwater to the Biscayne Aquifer. Due to the nature and frequency of this type of operation it is very hard to quantify the water volume produced from construction dewatering. If proper erosion and turbity controls are taken, utilizing filtering systems as required by local building codes this type of non-stormwater discharge will not deteriorate the water qual i ty. B. Fire Department Practices: The Fire on- Department contributes to stormwafer sic arges under the following conditions. 1. Regular Fire Hydrant Flushing: Fire Hydrant flushing is done every 4 months using 200 gal. per operation for approximately 2000 fire hydrants within the study area. Fire hydrant flushing will generate approximately 1,600,000 gallons of non-stormwater discharge a year. 2. Flow Tests: Flow tests are performed every 5 years for two minutes using an average flow of 800 GPM per hydrant. This practice will generate a volume of 3,200,000 gallons of non- stormwater discharge every 5 years or 640.000 gallons of ton-stormwater discharge every year. 3. Fire Drills: Fire drills are performed monthly at Dodge Island using an average flow of 10,000 gallons per month. This practice gnerates 120,000 gm.11ons of non•stormwater discharge a year. 4. Hater From Fires: Based on information from the City of Miami Fire Dept., an estimated average flow of 1,500,000 gallons of water a year is used in extinguishing fires. The mount varies considerably every year and is very hard to be quantified. S. System Flow Test: System flow tests are performed on a regular basis by the City of Miami Fire Department prior to issuing of water permits. An estimated average of 150,000 gallon per year is discharged through the drainage system into the Biscayne Aquifer or Biscayne Bay. yzt: C. Street Washing: Presently street washing is used only for Flag er s ree a ween Biscayne Blvd. and Government Center on a regular basis. Due to the nature of this operation the average volume of water discharged into the drainage system is difficult to measure. D. Gara2e Washdo►hn: Building code requirements dictate that water-rom garage washdowns is discharged to the san`tary sewer. However, older buildings garages discharge through floor drains into the storms sewer and eventually into the Biscayne Aquifer. A survey was performed by ODA to help quantify the water discharge. Unfortunately most of the garages do not perform washdowns on a regular basis, therefore, a pattern was not established and quantities of water flow could not be measured. E. Cross Connection: It is extremely difficult to quantify waste sc arge rome connection of Sanitary and Commerical/ Industrial waste to the stormmmwater system. The majority of connections were either permitted a long time ago or were done. illegally by different parties. Recent inquires to the department of Environment Regulation concluded that it would be very hard to identify evey connection to be able to calculate the discharged volume. 3) COMPLETE TABLE 5.1 (EXISTING WATER QUALITY) AND DESCRIBE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF EXISTING WATER QUALITY MONITORING. SPECIFY IF EXISTING WATER QUALITY STANDARDS HAVE BEEN EXCEEDED AND WHAT PROGRAMS, IF ANYp ARE IN PLACE TO IMPROVE EXISTING WATER QUALITY. ALSO, SPECIFY WHETHER OR NOT CURRENT WATER QUALITY CAN TOLERATE ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA WITHOUT EXCEEDING STANDARDS. Biscayne Bay has been the subject of numerous studies related to its physical, chemical and biological integrity. In the course of the preparation of this document many reports and studies were reviewed. The volume and extent of investigations attest to the concern for water quality in this unique estuarine environment. The Bay is defined and regulated in Chapter 17-3 as Outstanding Florida Waters. It is also a designated Aquatic Preserve by Florida Statute. Exhibit 5--8 lists agencies directly or indirectly involved with water quality issues on Biscayne Bay. The primary ongoing water quality characterization is being conducted by the Dade County Department of Environmental Resource Management (DERM). A monthly sampling of a 48 station surface water monitoring network has been conducted by DERM since 1979. A baseline data and trend analysis report was issued for the first four years of operation (Aileman 1985). Along the eastern shore of the study area DERM operates 4 monitoring stations which detect discharge impacts of stormwater runoff (see Figure 5-2). In addition: one station on the Miami River is in the study area. These stations are effective in monitoring the existing water quality from the downtown area. The overall water quality of Biscayne Bay is good and meets the most stringent of EPA& State and Dade County standards (See Exhibit 5-9). However, within the bay some of the "poorest water quality was located at the mouth of the Miami River". This was characterized by elevated levels of nitrogenr copper, iron, lead, turbidity and bacteria. There were also infrequent occurances of low dissolved oxygen in this area. Biscayne Bay has over 450 species of native fish in its estuarine waters. The predominant bottom vegetation is a mixture of turtle grass, manatee grass and Cuban shoal grass. The northern bay reading from Broward County to the Rickenbacker Causeway has been developed ar' shows the most signs of man -induced degradation. The central bay region f:.►am Rickenbacker south to Featherbed Bank is considered a transitional area as man-made effects are more limited. The southern bay is close to being pristine with little developmental impact. Bottom grasses are usually associated with water quality and a healthy ecosystem. Areas without bottom grasses are generally associated with poorer water quality. The "Both Communities of Biscayne Bay" rap shows the shoreline of the study area to oe classified as a barren dredged bottom. For this reason and urban storsater inputs& so of the worst water quality in the Bay is located on the eastern shore of the study area. The northern bay has a lame percentage of its shoreline in seawall construction. This is the least desirable of shorelines for water quality purposes since filtering and habitat foaming vegetation is removed. In w s • addition, the seawall tends to deflect wave energy back to the shallow water rather than act as an energy Absorbing shore. The entire study area has seawall construction. The north bay has good circulation and tidal flushing as reported by Mang and Van de Kreekef 1984. The Gove3rnv*nt Out had ebb and flood tide velocities up to 1.45 '/seas. Rickenbackesr Causeway had ebb and flood velocities up to 0.27 and 0.32 m/sec respectively. These high velocities and lame volumPs of saltwater effectively dilute and dispome pollutants entering the bay near they study area. Many ongoing and short term progra.s are underway which relate to existing water quality or advocate plans to improve it. There has been established a Biscayne Bay Management Committee (BE14C) which annually reports on the condition of the bay. The 1985/86 "State of the Bay" report indicates wstorawater runoff represents one of the lamest pollution threats to Biscayne Bay". Some of that organizatians stated goals which relate this study area are: 1. Initiate comprehensive program to clean up tributaries to the bay. 2. Remove toxic sediments in the Miami River. 3. Redesign detrimental stormwater outfails and eliminate all outfalls by 2005. A Miami River Outfall Study was conducted in an effort to identify the major causes of stormwater pollution. There were 55 such outfal l s defined and it was calculated that 6 out of 10 of, the worst polluting (concentration and total area contribution) were in the downtown area or directly west of I-95. An "Inventory of Stormwater Pollutant Discharges ...winto the Miami River concluded that the river east of Use salinity control structure received the heaviest storenwater pollutant load in Dade County (Poley, at al). A Biscayne Bay Hydrocarbon Study was commissioned and executed. The final report of Corcoran, at al indicated that the greatest threats of hydrocarbon sediment pollution stammed from two sources: 1) shipping and boating activities and 2) urban runoff. Surface waters in canals draining developed areas contained petrogenic (fuel and oil derived) hydrocarbons. Soma of the highest levels were observed in the Miami River. Other studies on oysters and sediments indicated stormm+ater runoff to be a prime source of contamination. It has been proposed and evaluations have been made of oceanic discharge of polluted materials from the Miami Rit,�r and the Miami Harbor Turning Basin. In response to concern for pollution erntering into and emanating from the Miami River, DERV established seven additional surface water sampling stations in 1983. Governor Graham by Executive Order in 1983 also established the Miami River Management Comittee (M.R.M.C.) mulish has made recommendations concerning the river's future. One of the main thrusts of the M.R.M.C. has been pursuit of federal assistance in the clean up of polluted bottom sediments from the river. 6-843 This was in part the response to a 1984 Florida Department of Environmental Regulation report which indicated the bottom sediments of the Miami River to have some of the highest levels of metals and synthetic organics found in any aquatic environments around the State. The Corps of Engineers has evaluated the disposal of these materials but have not found it a cost - beneficial option at present. Future management of urban runoff is a key factor to control of pollution after the sediments are re;+ved. In summary, there is ample water quality data available on the Miami River and Biscayne Day. Evidence points to the conclusion that general water quality is not a problem, however, the bottom sediments in some areas have been adversely affected by stormwater runoff and shipping. In addition, short term water quality problems arise at outtall points prior to diffusion and tidal mixing. With the addition of the Miami River stations, DERM# being the lead agency in assuring water quality, has in place adequate sarpling stations to determine the long term impact of the study area on water quality. However& the monitoring programs to be suggested later for the study area will incorporate further short term intensive flow studies to aid in assessing specific stormwater outfalls. Current development guidelines to be outlined later, require any project in the study area to contain stormwater that is currently being discharged to surface water. For this reason& additional development in the study area is seen as a means of Improving surface water quality. Groundwater The Biscayne Aquifer is a hydrologic unit of water bearing rock that carries unconfined ground water in southeastern Florida. In the Miami area the aquifer is approximately 120 to 130 feet thick and is located at virtually ground level. The base of the aquifer can be determined in the Miami area by an impervious marl of the Tamiami formation. This unconfined aquifer is recharged mostly from local rainfall events. An average of 60 inches of precipitation annually fall in Dade County. Of the 60 Inches it Is estimated that 22 inches are discharged by evapotranspiration and surface runoff. Of the 38 inches reaching the water table, 20 inches is discharged as groundwater flow and 18 inches is discharged by evapotranspiration of groundwater and by pumping from wells (Schroeder* et at). Water table in the study area fluctuates about 2.0 ft. on an annual basis. The only other recharge to the Biscayne Aquifer comes from contaminated stormwater runoff that filters through retention pond sands and exfiltration* systems to the aquifer or overland flow of stormwater that enters canals which recharge the aquifer. The quality of the water is one of the most troublesome factors for the aquifer. Contaminants are easily transported into the aquifer by various mans. One of the most troublesome mineral constituents in the aquifer is iy-on. The other is salt water. In the Miami area salt water has encroached the fresh water aquifer by leaking in to contaminate the aquifer along the -coast and canal systems. Other contaminants found in the aquifer are characterized by a USGS well In the study area (soe Table 5.1 and Figure 5-2). E The presence of these contaminants indicate man induced pollution may be occuring. This 1977 sample indicates none of these contaminants exceed maximum contamination levels; and since the aquifer in the study area is east of the salt barrier line there is no existing regulatory concern for pollution of this portion of the aquifer, It is unlikely that potable aquifers could be affected, However, the long term effects of introducing polluted stormwater into this aquifer are unknown. A freshwater curtain of drainage wells in the study area could help inhibit further salt water intrusion, or it could provide a pool of contamination which might eventually migrate inland or seaward. These pollutants introduced into the surficial aquifer could also empty into the canals that discharge to surface waters and the Biscayne Bay. TABLE 5.1: EXISTING WATER DUALITY SaW le n Groundwater Par meters Oil and Grease 1 mg/l. Lead 2 ug/l USGS Melt G-3143 Total Nitrogen .90 mg/l Nickel 3 ug/l • (Index 0391) Total Phosphorus- .01 mg/1 Strontium 1200 ug/l Cobalt 3 ug/l Zin. 20 ug/i Copper 3 ug/l Aluminum 60 ugl/l Iron 340 ug/l Phenols 23 - ug/i 1964-1985 Sample Averages~ , Fecal Col. Surface Raters D.O. NOD(, TON, TNR, P.04, Turb., Amonia, Pb, Cadmium Fe MPL Cu, Zn, MF/organisms MPL 100 mill. WL MPU MPL MPL MPL per Bay Station 116 5.3 4 2.8 17 119 5.3 4 3.1 63 (Miami River) 120 5.2 0.04 0.3 13 0.03 6.2 0.11 0.07 0.03 22 1.0 2.7 470 121 5.3 4 3.8 90 Miami River Station 1984 Annual Average per DERM For Water Quality Standards See Exhibit 5-9 Outfalls to Surface Water No existing analytical data, See Exhibit 5-4 for existing stormater pollutant loads. OWL See Figure S-2 for monitoring sites. z 1. SPECIFY HOW THE WATER OUALITY PLAN WILL MITIGATE OR ELIMINATE EXISTING ADVERSE IWACTS FROM SfORMWATER RUNOFF INCORPORATING SOME OR ALL OF THE FOLLOWING: 11 ELIMINATING ALL DIRECT DISCHARGES TO SURFACE WATERS► 2) INCREASING ON -SITE RETENTION OF STO".ATER, 3) REMOVING POLLUTANTS FROM STOR#iWATER RUNOFF THROUGH OPERATIONAL MEASURES (E.G., PARKING LOT AND STREET VACUUMING) AND STRUCTURAL MEASURES (E.G., USE OF GRASS SWALES FOR RUNOFF RETENTION, AND 4) REOUIRING ALL CATCH PaASINS TO BE CONSTRUCTED SO THAT OILS AND CREASES ARE SEPARATED FROM RUNOFF AND POLLUTANTS ARE PERIODICALLY RD40VED FROM CATCH BASINS FOR PROPER DISPOSAL. In order to answer this question completely it will be beneficial to review the development procedures as they exist in terms of stormwater permitting. It has been a Dade County requirement since 1974, limited in some instances due to poor soils, that the first inch of runoff be retained on -site in Dade County. This policy was further defined by DERM in "Design of Drainage Structures" 1980 which prohibited the discharge of the first inch of stormwater runoff and encouraged total on -site retention where feasible. No direct "positive drainage" to surface water was to be allowed. Since it has been estimated that 90%-1005 of the pollutant loading is carried by the "first flush" in the first inch of runoff, this was seen as a major step toward preventing further water quality degradation from this source. In 1983, the FDER further accelerated stormwater treatment requirements with the addition of Chapter 17-25 Stormwater Permitting of the Florida Administrative Code. The implementation of the permitting of this rule has been delegated to the South Florida Water Management District (SFhiMD). In April 1982, the City of Miami Public Works Department adopted rules that are more restrictive than the Florida Administrive Code. City regulations prevent the direct and/or indirect flow of rainwater from new development to public storm sewers. Also, existing development is required to have an on -site stormwater disposal system when the property is improved in the value of S5,000.00 or more by addition or renovation. In the study area, the City of Miami, Dade County and the State of Florida all have transportation and associated drainage systems which flow to surface water. If the city's stormwater disposal criteria are met, then usually the SFWMD and DERM permitting requirements are satisfied as well. Through the use of on -site stormwater collection systemas# two -stage sedimentation tanks, drainage wells and pop -off overflow, new developments have been able to meet the Public Works Departments regulations. These developments, have greatly reduced the discharge of storowater pollutants to surface waters. These pollutants are being discharged into the Biscayne Aquifer at depths where the chloride content is greater than 1500 ppm. This portion of the aquifer is not considered to be a potential source of drinking water and therefore not hard by the discharge. There may also be some benefit to retarding further saltwater Intrusion through increased use of drainage wells. However, the SFWMD has recently promulgated new groundwater rules affecting -� discharges to Outstanding Florida Waters which may modify this mode of disposal. The new criteria may require the retention and treatment of the y -- w first one-half inch of system. Yet, the deeper for exemption from this ry of enforcement of this new at this time, runoff prior to discharge into any groundwater Biscayne aquifer in the study area could qualify le due to its high saltwater content. The extent rule and its effect on the study area is unclear 5o then it is apparent that any new development or re -development within the study area will require a substantial emphasis on stormwater retention which will greatly reduce the pollutant load currently ,going to surface waters. It is estimated that 16% of the developable land within the study currently meets retention standards and that an additional 69X will be re- developed in the 20 year planning window (see Exhibits 5-4 and 5-7). The runoff from the remainder of developable land is not considered to be significant. Improved tochn'.ques and equipment for utter control, street and parking lot cleaning will help remove pollutants at the source so they are not carried into the stormwater system. The City of Mimi is constantly - upgrading its public works cleaning equipment and private developers by development order will be required to clean their parking facilities. Within the study area there remains a rather large segment of surface area dedicated to road right-of-ways for street, sidewalk and utility purposes. About 26.6 % or 211 acres of the study area is dedicated to this purpose. No substantial water quality improvement plan could be offered without dealing with the existing roadways and their associated drainage systems. Current DERM interpretation of the 1980 drainage criteria treats the existing roadways as a ngrandfathered" entity and exempt from the current prohibition on positive drainage. However, when any substantial reworking of the roadway or utilities within the roadway occurs, the segment is required to upgrade in terms of stormwater retention. This process has already occured with segments of Third, Fourth and Fifth Streets N.E. by the City and a portion of FDOTrs right-of-way being refur- bished to include french drains (see Exhibit 5-12). The City of Miami Public Works Department currently has plans to re-work-39 acres of streets in the next 5 years. Outfalls to which these areas are tributary can expect an improvement in water quality. Once roads are refurbished, a maintenance program through Miami Public Works will insure that any french drains or other control devices will be operational to move the maximum. Improved designs such as adding floating debris baffles to french drains or utilizing underdrains will keep the amount bf oil and grease and other insoluble pollutants retained to a maximum. Exhibit 5-10 indicated the generic types of storawater options available for downtown Miami and they are listed in decreasing order of preference. Due to poor soils and lack of economical space the first two options may be more difficult to attain. The third and fourth are the prevailing options at this time utilizing discharge to the dbep and shallow aquifers respectively and upon which all study area pollutant load projections are made. Exhibits 5-5, 5-6 b 5-7 show the projected stormwater loads by sub - districts for the Phase I, II and III milestones. 2. DEFINE A WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM THAT WILL ADEQUATELY MONITOR THE IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN ON SURFACE AND GROUND i WATER QUALITY. IDENTIFY CAPITAL. AND OPERATING COSTS. There are currently 5 surface rater monitoring stations in proximity to the study area (see Figure 5•-2). Four are in Biscayne Bay and one in the Miami River. These stations are adequate in number and location to give information as to generrl surface Crater quality trends in the study area. It was noted that the bay water quality near the mouth of Miami River had infrequent lapses in dissolved oxygen concentrations and elevated bacteri. presumably due to stormwater runoff. It would seem prudent to further define the extent of stormwater impact in these areas by correlating data shifts at DERM's established stations for samples taken after significant rainfall events. This information would help determine the extant of impact of stormwater. To further define the inpact it would also be critical to quantify flow at the largest outfalls from the planning area during the same storm events. Figure 5-1 indicates the location of all outfalls and especially those 36" and greater. It is recommended that 20 of the largest outfalls be checked for storawater flow at six separate storm events. The coordination of this type of sampling could help define the impact on surface waters. The estimated capital and operating costs are listed on Exhibit 5-11. The Biscayne aquifer currently has several monitoring wells operated by the USGS in the study area. The number and sampling of these wells is not deemed adequate for proposed crater quality impacts. It is proposed that 3 existing USGS wells in the study area be tested twice a year for parameters indicative of stormwater runoff so that the overall impact and movement of these contaminants may be monitored. The USGS currently has other studies on -going concerning french drains which should provide useful data for the water quality impact of these systems proposed in downtown Miami. It is also recommended that two short terse monitoring projects be instituted by development order to evaluate the relative efficiencies of future retention systems. Since USGS data will address french drains, one drainage well and infiltration basin installation should be evaluated in the study area as to groundwater impacts. Each type system should have an upgradient and two downgradient wells to be monitored for specified parameters monthly'for the first year of operation and thereafter seem -annually for a total of 5 years. The results of these studies can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of each system (see Exhibit 5-11 for capital and operating costs). The data generated in the above sampling should be coordinated by OEM at the request of the City of Miami and should be reported to USGS, SFWND and FDER. It should also be evaluated by these and the City of Miami- toward possibly modifying the fetention systems design criteria. 3. SPECIFY WHAT STRUCTURAL AM OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS ARE NECESSARY FOR INCLUSION IN ALL DEVELOPMENT ORDERS TO MINIMIZE WATER QUALITY IMPACTS; Aid? j� SPECIFY WHAT ADDITIOML ACTION WILL BE TAKEN, AND 6Y WHOM, IF WATER s" QUALITY DETERIORATION OCCURS. All new developnt and redeveloped areas in downtown are required to retain all runoff on -site from a six inch per hour rainfall event. Where percolation is not adequate to provide the required 48 hour drawdown of this storage volume then underdrains should be utilized. Drainage wells or covered exfiltration trenches could be utilized to dispose of the underdrain volume. This volume could also be discharged back to storumwater outfalls according to DER4 guidelines. The new SFWMD stormwater rule may require the first one-half inch of runoff to be pre-treated in the above manner prior to discharge to the aquifer. This would enhance existing drainage well designs and keep pollutants out of the aquifer. However, pro -treated water may be discharged to surface waters and may eliminate than ne,,d for costly drainage wells. Developers that cannot practically comply with the above should be allowed to consider the drainago well as another option. However, at least one such project should have a monitoring program as discussed previously to determine the long term effects of aquifer discharge. The existing acreage committed to street right-of-ways must have a priority list of refurbishments which are to take place. The list can be made up of projects currently budgeted by the City of Miami, Dade County and the FDOT. To this list can be added the streets under which existing outfalls that cause the most water pollution as determined from the intensive surveys outlined above. If public lands abut an existing street with an outfall slated for upgrading then grassed retention areas should be considered as the optimum treatment mode (see Case I Exhibit 5-13). However, due to the lack of availability of such land, and the depths at which outfalls exist this may not be practical. In lieu of this approach, the existing streets to be refurbished should have detention areas designed to accept the first inch '%f runoff with drawdown by percolation or exfiltration underdrain's which .mould flow back to the outfalls (see Case II Exhibit 5-13). The system must be designed to allow maintenance of the percolation area or underdrain surface to insure periodic removal of sediment that will inhibit outflow and render the unit ineffective. Drainage wells should be considered the retrofit option of least preference. As a secondary choice the refurbished streets could utilize the french drain or covered trench exfiltration systems discharging to the shallow aquifer. Maintenance of these system is essential so that accumulating contaminants do not breakthrough absorptive layers and flow to surface �= water. Outfalls carrying substantial flows that do not originate in the planning area, but yet, which discharge in it must also be addressed. Mitigation of these outfalls must be studied by the City of Miami to further determine if upstream retention of the first inch of runoff is feasible. Once collected, however, the only downstream alternatives are costly retrofit programs to provide sedimentation and retention basins or more costly treatment designs. Nonstructural control measures such as litter control programsr street sweeping operations and stormwate r system maintenance within the authority of the appropriate municipalities primarily the City of Miami should be maintained and upgraded if practicable. It is not anticipated that any surface water quality deterioration will occur. Impacts to the groundwaters must be monitored accurately and as soon as feasible so that any undesirable changes could be detected early and further stormwater treatment be required in following development orders. C. SPECIFY REGULATORY COVENANTS NEEDED TO MEASURES DESCRI13ED IN B.3 QUALITY STANDARDS ARE NOT AND PERMITTING CHANGES AND/OR RESTRICTIVE IMPROVE RATER DUALITY; ENSURE THAT ABATEMENT ARE IMPLEMENTED AND THAT COUNTY AND STATE WATER VI O ATED . The current regulatory framework encompassing the South Florida Building Codes, DERK's 1980 Design Policy. and SFWMD+s Design Criteria regarding stormwater control of now development is deemed adequate to Improve water quality during the planning period. The extent to which contaminants taken off surface water systwts and deposited in the goundwater systems have a detrimental effect on the aquifer must be monitored by future developers. A monitoring program for the major stormater outfalls is recommended to be undertaken by the City of Miami to help prioritize them for further abatement action. ® The sequence and extent of street refurbishment must be coordinated between Miami, Dade County and FDOT so that designs might be standardized and assessed for water Quality impact. In addition, the major outfalls which are scheduled to be retrofitted for pollution control must be coordinated with the agency that owns the right-of-way that system lies in. It is recommended that the City of Miami assist, the FDOT and County in coordinating the transfer of data, scheduling and permitting of retrofit through DEF , SFW * FDER and other regulatory entities. Currently the FDER is scheduled to dispense about $470,000 of State funds to Dade County - for pollution control on the Miami 'River.- Projected budgeting of these funds is as follows: rA Water Quality Monitoring S 60,000.00 Bank Erosion Stabilization S 600000.00 Two Watershed Pollution Control Officers 51000000.00 One Marine Pollution Control Officer S 508000.00 Retrofit Problem Outfalls 5200400.00 Total - $470#000.00 The water quality monitoring will more than likely go toward maintaining the seven monitoring stations on the Miami River and studying outfalls. The downtown area will derive some benefit from these funds. The outfalls to be retrofitted have not been designated and could be in the planning area if the need is investigated and is warranted. The funding of pollution control officers is a major stop toward maintaining a vigilance on the water quality. These officers could be utilized in the study area by providing inspections of existing and future stormwater control systems# public and private, to insure they are maintained sufficiently to perform the purpose for which they were intended. Specifically, these are the maintenance of detention/retention, french drain, drainage well and monitoring systems. Should water quality violations persist further sampling efforts could be undertaken to isolate the causes and a plan of action developed toward a specific location. Further work must be done to concentrate efforts to .i s prioritize the existing outfalls for retrofit. The logical entity for this task is the City of Miami Public Works Department since the majority of outfalls to the Miami River and Biscayne Bay are under their authority. The city currently has a $30#000,000 bond for upgrading the storm sewer system. Some of these funds are earmarked for pollution control in the form of french drains and outfall retrofitting. Other outfall improvement programs may be eligible for future FDER water quality project grants. Toward further action on abatement work it must be planned that the levels of retrofit of existing outfalls, dictated by outfall monitoring and prioritization, will be limited by funds available. Sources of State funds have been found and more are sought. The federal government has been approached about removing the sediments in the Miami River and grant work under EPA for storm outfalls could also be pursued. In the 20 year planning period further bond programs for storm sewer upgrading could be sought as a mans for outfall retrofit. As part of the development orders for individual future projects within the planning area it must be stipulated that not only are the stormwater management systems to be designed to meet DERM and SFWMD standards, but that these must also be maintained in a routine program to insure their efficiencies. Detention/Retention exfiltration, french drain and drainage wells with two -stage separators will not function properly without sustained maintenance. In so far as the stormwater pollutant load to the Miami River and Biscayne Bay. is mitigated by the redevelopment of private and public tracts meeting new standards and the potential for groundwater contamination is minimized by further monitoring, the downtown Miami area should only see enhancement of water quality. These efforts will be accelerated by the investigation, planning and funding of pollution control retrofit for existing stormwater outfalls. Implementing these measures will insure that no degradation of the unique Biscayne Bay water resource will result from the continued development of the downtown area. R' EXHIBIT S-1 STORWATER POLLUTANT LOADS lbs/acre/day- SS TNR BOD TOC C00 TN Tp C1 Pb Zn Fe Cu Cd Cr Ni Oil 4 TVS FHMA Study 6 Highway Runoff 14.0 --- 0.88 2.1 6.9 0.84 0.05 13.0 0.06 0.02 0.50 0.006 0.002 0.003 0.27 Grease Sites 9.34 ------ USGS Broward County Highway --- 2.0 ---•• 0.41 0.94 0.02 0.002A 0.007 0.002 B. Ctsmwercial Land Use 3.6 ---- 0.40 1.8 0.02 0.002 ---- 0.010 0.003 C. Residential --- 3.9 ---- 0.42 0.70 0.046 0.009 ---•• 0*003 0.003 EPA Durham N.C. Urban Runoff 18.3 •-- ---- 0.51 2.57 0.02 0.013 ----0.008 0.005 0.28 0.004 ----- 0.004 0.003 3.99 ------ EFA Cincinattt Urban Runoff 2.0 --- 0.09 ---- 0.66 0.024 0.007 ---- ----.• -�.... __,._ _M._ _ _�- Tama NURP k. Highway __- - e 1.18 e 0.07 ---- ---_ 0.036 0.005 ----0.007 0.004 ---- 0.001 ----- ----.• _--- -,..... -�� B. Comm rcial --- 1.55 0.14 ---- ---- 0.036 0.005 ---- 0.007 0.003 ---- C. Residential -- •0.29S O.OS2 ---- ---• 0.02S O.00S ---- 0.0007 0.0007 ---- 0.0001 ----- ----.. ---- ---- .. - , _----- 1-95 Bridge USGS 3.02 --- ----- 2.87 8.3 0.153 0.006 ---- 0.025 0.014 ---- 0.002 BDL SFMO Ca racial 9.9 --- 0.447 ---- BDL ---- 7.26 0.26 Estimate ---- 0.031 0.011 ---- ----_ -..--- ...._- -_•_- .._,._ �,._ �- �.._ _- eStermater Managamsnt:. an updatsO Manialista and GDL 8*lOw Detection Limit Yousaf -July 1985 per City Miami Public Motics Q� Isom r� ' �'IllI�ViIIII�IIIVI.��II����'ll�l,ill I � �6 � I I I _. I I III I i III I I�Illl�i�l�l I�l+lllol I�III � I •; j EXHIBIT 5-2 DOWNTOWN MIAMI ORI STOftATER POLLUTANT LOADING FACTORS lbs/acre/yr Impervious Oil 6 4 COD TNR/SS TN TP Pb Zn Cu Grease Park/Open Areas(3) 10% 7.4(4) 15.1(4) 3.99 0.69 0 0 0 0 r Lour Density Residential(2) 30% 256 1424 16.8 3.29 1.09 1.09 0 0 School/Institutional(3) 60% 23.0 377 3.99 0.69 0 0 0 0 Medium Density Resl�ential(3) 40% 23.0 377 10.9 2.27 0.29 0.31 0.06 � 0' r Cammercial/'Office(2) 90% 657 1314 7.3 0.73 3.65 1.10 0 0 high Density Urban(2) 95% 657 1314 7.3 0.73 3.65 1.10 0 G +' Devulopment Hfghxay(1) 95% 3030 1102 55.8 2.19• 9.13 5.11 0.73 94.9 (1) USGS I-95 Bridge Study - Close to study area, only hydrocarbon data available, recent sampling. (2) USGS Brosard County - Close to study area, commercial district similar to highly developed urban area. i (3) Tampa NURP Study - Only proximate data available for these land uses, recent sampling. (4) Estimated from Wanielista and Yousef, July 1985. EXHIBIT 5-3 DOWNTOWN MIAMI DRI LAND USE ESTIMATES -1986 Downtown Miami DRI Sub -District Breakdown Total Study Area Central Business District Brickell Omni . Acres 5 Total Acres % Acres 5 Acres 5 `F[ Park/Open Space 112.6 14.28 112.6 27.4 0 0 0 0 Low Density Residential 10.4 1.3% 0 0 5.20 2.7 5.20 218 School/Institutional 45.2 5.78 20.2 4.9 25.0 12.9 0 0 a Mod/Density Residential 41.2 5.28 0 0 9.5 4.9 31.7 16.8 c rcial/Office' 222.0 28.08 111.0 27.0 64.9 33.4 46.1 24.6 High Density/Urban I 149.9 18.95- 79.0 19.2 41.5 21.4 29.4 15.6 Highway 211.7 26.7% 88.0 21.4 48.0 24.7 7S.7 40.2 Total - 793 100% 410.8 100.0 194.1 100 188.1 100.0 4>n it ick., l • Omni , Surface Hater 019e1oar@s Am ss CCD 711IN TH TP A 2a Qs all S Grasse Acres CW 7HIN TH TP f7 2e Ce oil 6 Gr+ue Acres COD THIN TV 7► . P% Ia d of or Park Open/Sp"s 112.E e3.3 176 44.9 7.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.5 0 1O2 a 1066 0 12.6 0 2.3 0 D.e 0 O.e 0 0 0 0 s S12 e 3" 4 221 6 24.2 0 $.1 0 1.7 0 1.7 0 0 t t Low Density scioollln¢ittatt4aral 0 6.4 0 0 0 $9.2 1447.7 15.1 0 !.6 0 0 0 0 e e 0 0 0 0 s 0 0 0 a 0 0 n 0 0 0 s t Hediea Density 0 a 0 a a 0 0 0 0 O.S 97.4 1437.6 41.4 6.6 1.1 1.2 0,2 0 31.7 291.4 4730 136.2 M m 3.7 3.37 9.76 t COMOM16110frice 111.9 6S634.3 131266.E 729.3 72.9 364.6 109.9 6 6 53.9 $1693.7 SLM.4 3S2.2 35.2 174 S1 0 0 46.1 27230.9 54S17,A M2.4 31.3 151.•4 45.a a c H/Qk Density Urban 40.0 24966 51W4 277.4 27.7 136.7 41.e 0 0 4i.4 2511.2 50231 297.e ".9 143.E 43.4 0 9 79.4 133SO 36700 703.3 4012.3 2q.4 157.3 111.'1 565.E 30.7 367.3 0 32.3 t 602 HIB1Ae67 76.9 2207 M 00297 4065.9 161.6 665.1 372.3 53.2 6914.0 40.0 1381" 5 02S1 2S44.5 29.9 414.3 233 13.3 4327 •7S.7 217902 7924a 6" Tot¢l¢ 346.7 111553 263115 9131 271 1169 $24 51 6OlS 15S.1 196043 161119 3239 175 735 331 34 4327 136,1 264202 177460 46s4 242 115 44!r 33 64 (2p 0riebil O"n4 6reewd.ster ,s OOrpes Acres MD TK TP Pe 2a COC"Ase all L Acres C00 T" TIN TP PA Is Cv Oil 1 G"Iss den• Cm7V n' r'4 7r C+ Oil Gre Part Opearipau C 0 0 a 0 0 e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 6 a 0 a ! 0 0 0 0 0 0 Low Density 0 0 a a 0 0 0 0 0 2.7 207.4 1153.4 13.6 2.7 0.1 0.9 0. 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 scimol/1astltetimal 13.9 109.4 3121.6 31.0 1.7 0 0 0 0 25.0 351 $655 59.9 10.4 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 He61re 0en¢Ity 0 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A •0 0 0 0 A 0 0 CasoerclalPOfrlee 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.1 6i61.T 13363.4 74.2 7.4 37.1 11.2 a 0 a 0 a 0 0 Higt Den¢4ty Ur6ae 39.0 2079.9 40 0.7 70.5 r7.e 135.2 40.e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s /tipkeay 11.1 32S27 11529.9 59O 23.6 95.0 $4.9 7.9 1019 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 a a a set Totals 64.1 5709E 63635 903 $6 233 06 6 1019 39.0 7234 20172 146 21 36 12 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 s 0 0 0 Totals 410.6 360644 362750 603E 317 14DZ in 61 7034 294.1 203277 1l2O1 3357 IN 776 343 34 4327 169.1 2642o2 177469 4"4 242 913 449 53 60i 0wd Upow Year 200E M tree Lead btederolsreat 7.6 Acres or Htoway Mforblabod Aaeoaltl 7" Mferbisbsaat Coreoot 190 Trent brafospe Hells French Drains frtisltleso of ad - �: _I _I_ 0 �i run an frleaNl ant S.rtic. f•reas;o Oats 01acUms /ars COD 7M0 71i 'W M 26 d wu. Aerso t20 7N11 711 7r r• Zo Ca was• •0 Acne em vm 7" 7r n Ze d P41i 0lreafs"m 113.6 81.3 179 48.1 7.4 0 • • 0 • • • 0 • f 0 f • e 0 0 0 • 0 . • f LOW D"t1t7 SeMan3flestt4ettaaal p sa • • i 0 ! 73.2 119169 12.7 2.2 0 i • • 1.0 146.t Sal.? CA 1.1 6 6 • e %.1 114.2 17311 20,7 4.4 2J 1.3 e f 06elm t1a+cicy 0 0 i 0 • • , • • ! • • • • 7.6 • • • 69 . 1131 J.7 • a.6 • 9 • .9 i 2 • e e 239.e, 0 e 234 1779 e low 0 23 e 2.9 9 1.I • 0 cawsrctalnKrlce 97.4 J51G7l.6 101139.2 574.2 $7.4 267.1 KS ! • 47-2 24952.9 AM01.7 277J 27.7 138.1 41.1 • 9 36.3 214a4.2 42973.4 2.31.3 23.3 IM2 33.9 0 • Hipp Dalett7 Urbea 113 14660.7 39321.1 219.5 21.E 209.2 32.9 0 i 32.7 20409.7 40519.4 226.E 22.7 113.4 34.2 0 e 23.1 1#412.1 71AM3.7 140.2 14.0 10.1 74.1 0 • Mrb.af . B2.S 17990E-3 6S43L3 3313.1 U0.0 $42.1 30.4 UJ $04.6 31.1 11134P.4 AM3.1 2072.7 11.3 339.1 319.0 27.1 3123 $1.7 1'77303.S 943t3.7 3Z70.7 12A.1 334.2 Z99,3; 42.6 1362.E fw! 1o4a3e Z99.1 211403 2104M.9 AMA 219.2 :Del 421.E 63.E $631.6 WA 13627.0 113601.E 2619.1 241.4 522.6 267.3 27.3 3S2S 234.2 224430.3 341477.3 3729.1 123.2 73a.1 161.2 43.4 116206 COD kk1l3 j a .. t Gresn4satar 011.1• all A. Oil 6 01ae1�arpea Acres Li1P TMt IN Tr• eri 24 to 6rs460 Acres cw ?A. 711. 7r r# 29 C4 Grtas! Acrt4 1m T" 7T r1 IV Ce Grease rem "Wspaes e a 0 p 0 0 t • • e • • • • 0 0 0 0 0 / 0 1 0 9 e e 0 Log Density 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.7 207.E 3153.4 13.E 2.7 0.9 9.• e 0 2.1 64.E 460.1 3.1 1.3 .3.4 1 A 0 0 Se►wlttlas4t4v--- -- 1S.0 207 1303 31.9 6.2 i 0 • • 21.9 $43 1631 10.1 1/,4 0 0 0 9• a 1 0 a 1 1 3 0 0 14141 a O"My 9 9• 0 0• 0 i, • 0 0 ' 2.9 29.4 302 i.E 1.9 0.3 1.3 0 0 6.7 61.1 1011.2 21.4 4.1 1.3 0.9 0.2 • Ce.euretatfwfles 23.6 I's9 AJ 279e119.4 ISS 21.1 T7.1 23A t t 22.7 33A22.6 26641 r 341.1 34.0 74.4 22.E a 0 1.4 379..E 21549.1 $4.4 4.3 32.2 1.7 0 11 1110 Deesttl Urban 47.4 29SPA.7 S9169,4 579.7 32.P 364.4 41.5 9 . 0 9.4 3182.7 117U.3 64.4 6.6 22.7 9.9 1 1 6.3 3901 M2 41.4 4.4 11.7 1.4 0 0 "10"y 21.E 73601.E :r S.0 12S1.9 11.1 2nJ 123.6 17.7 2271.9 0.9 23402.0 9230.0 AMP 31.4 76.6 42.9 4.2 71S.7 14.0 40249 14696.E 742.2 29.1 111.4 47.9 9.7 U62.2 StAr 70t01a 237.1 11714LI MR.? i671.4 INN 40.1 196.7 17.7 2296.9 70.7 AM" E41S" 164.7 14.E 366.2 79J i.2 79L7 21.0 10141.2 1102.4 as 471 176.1 U.S 1.9 UU-2 loch 619.7 364ULZ 32WL6 6038.E 327.5 IA01.3 6195 61.E 7103.5 U4.2 2e13406.7 1 JMJ 330.E 1111 777.7 $0.1 33.1 A120.7 166.1 2MI71.7 177132.E 460.7 242.1 114.9 441.3 33.2 EQad DOW ltirsat Year 200E ass use land wenjaparat 7.6 Acres of 14109war War►lshed Anaaell7 7" RltarNshm"t current an triad of Oratsap hails aN frena6 Drab* 0e•ttaa• eal cm 01, t TH 7r n 2. d a sr.«. llcr.s cap IMII Oil l 7W TP h 2. q . 0 0 • Earf.e. Tw11 Ill �' h 2. A.ews O00 0 0 0 1 • •stow Oisewr" OWN 0� • 0 0 • • 0 • 30• 230.4 12E1.6 13.i 2.i 1 3 0 • p • • • 1.4 •0 0 • q 0 0 3 0 . 4 • Pcat QpW' WA 112.6 •3.3 179 44.9 7•8 • • • • 1,3 f7; f®S.4 6.6 Oa 0 • p 0 ® ® p 0 f • • • • p 10.3 lba.4 2739.4 79.4 1R.4 17 7 0 Low p nslty 4.1 56.E l27.4 !.t 1.7 0 • f,S 50.E ttf.4 23.! f.t 0.6 0.T 0.1 26.3 1Si70 3133.,3 17A.1 17.A4 irk 37 7+h.2 a Sck..lfle.tltrtienal 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 p lb.t ;WN6 �lv37�A 254914 9A.2 41337 2314 3a.1 4D00.4 Rees. Density • 0 23.9 1404 7 20709.4 D6S.9 1E.3 321E 24.E • 47.7 1373e3 C' m.rcialfOific. .63.t ST724.f 1544i.i 419.9 41.9 200.E 34.2 • 4300.1 wl¢4 O...it7 tYr01. %3.0 7t3ss.S 25714.! 1S9.S IS.! 7i.t N.0 • ilokDe 447 243.1 20.9 27=7 1F2.3 1E3As9 104a61! 2714.1 147.3 141.1 I73,a 37.E 46.3 13901t.S fOS65.1 2560.4 1oo.f 415.9 234.E S3.S u3,� f1 6 41f1l.1 t!l113S 11i91f 1� 2ED.f lAb.s IO.f 1 6aR ,'ota t 2S2 1l12S2 1SS c24 3194 231.1 706J 322 33.i 43S 4.ni gridsl, all L CED Oil t st 2 a CIO Crass. 1�0 T#li � � Tll 2r cm gross. has 9 0 0 011 t h •Ry.nnd..t.r res C�i7 ,lilt Tll T! Pk Ise C. Cr.+s• Acre. 0 0 0 7 7 .7 ,7 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 , ® 0 I.I 16R.9 i39,9 11.1 7' n 0 0 B1stAsrp�S 0 0 0 0 • • C I0T 207.4 1133.1 13.6 2.7 0.! ••! a 0 it 3 0 0 0 n 0 raft �* h • q ° la.t Iaza.3 sa.a lz.z 1.3 1.7 0 ® 0 ® • 0 ® ® • 2S.! SAS SES6 Sf.f I0.4 0 O.1 3 Low Density pwS 0 19.E 11549.5 23179 1za.E 12.i 14,.E lA•4 0 h.6 0 0 0 $03 17.E 3.7 O.S 31. EI,A 13.1 9 tc4eeifFnstitstE.acl 16.1 3641.6 3®.S 0 0 p 0 • 4.0' 36.E 12.7 Ii.7 0 ® 12.3 7sel.f 15603.2 .6.7 3•a C 0 @ 0 p 34.3 2202t2 4es63 225.4 22-3 171.T 33.i 0 meth.. Density "7f0l.4 SS616.S 310.1 31 115.0 46.9 0 - 0 IS.$ U76S 23331 130.7 13.1 65.7 17.3 371.3 23.0 t059! 29313.2 41R4.3 sR.3 ZA2.a 133.i 19.4 2524. commamisiloftiee 42•T « 1110 O...ity li " S6 SAM am$ 36t.4 St.! 1i4.2 3l.S • 73.E 100202.1 710641 1769.E f4.3 352.E 170.E 19.7 I524. Highway 1i.7 11427T 4FS62 21G4.S 92.6 SACS 191.7 2F.S 'lfl.2 17.7 SOt06 i � 13 �, $9 1 3�6 349.7 17J 511.3 449j S3.2 6014.• Srb IotAs 4 = Itl116 3161.7 lg4.6 7T7f.2 30.6 31-2 3314 ItE.1 264140.E DT73S2.6 4t6D.7 I43.1 f14.f 15i 17T36t 170027 Yt42 15! 6S3.S Zit 37.E 3SlF.I 102.t 63442 %Pula 410.r 360E12 S261S1 6033.5 3f4.1 1361.1 619.7 61 7373.7 '1 i2i3S saw tipo.a Saar 200E bSi Ih. i jps{ y slot mAnnesl,y orai.s Co tt... 7.6 A_res of Highway YeI,E E.6 ItMck 741 Harelsish ma Groot 1386 Trivial of Or41.40. Syrf later Riseflarp Acres C00 TM TN Ir Pb za ce creme Acres CAD 110 79 1T OFOMOAC =1 h Is Ce • C00 T" III 1T n 2. a raft qowsP+ce 112.E 11134 17a 44.9 7.6 4 e a • • 0 0 a • a 0 le+ Densftp sel'"lflnstfultieeal 0 1.6 a 24.6 0 407.2 0 4.3 • 7 9 0 0 a 1.1 90.5 SSS.4 6.6 1J 0.4 0.4 • 0 • r • .• 410.4 3410.4 49 .• 0 a 43 'IS ,S e o • 0 Me6fee 9"Sitg a 0 a 0 a 0 9 • a 0 • a a 0 1.5 0 3.9 0 0 226.2 6.S 0 1.4 0 2 9 2 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 4 0 e • Casre161fOrrfee 16.E 0015.E 10117.2 102.1 10.1E $4.5 16.4 0 0 6 4730.4 0460.0 52.E S.3 75.3 7.0 0 0 0 4.4 44.2 713.4 20.ir 4.3 3 .6 1 0 Hti� Osn4itp Ur444 6 374t.9 7469.9 41.E 4.1E 20.0 i.i 0 0 6.2 3a69.7 7731.1 42.9 4.3 21.S 6.5 a 0 4.1 4079.9 9159.1 4.1.3 4.3 22.4 . 4„a • • i4iptaraT Me $72a2.2 2MI.3 1054.9 41.4 1T2.6 9.6 134 1194 12.5 349Mo3 13086.1 $62.6 26.1 10s.4 4D.7 4.1 0 4.4 1124.1 17.7 274E-3 3492.3 16704.3 "S23.9 30.3 1044.3 3.1 40.9 15.3 170.7 1.4 75,4 r 13.1 0 1716 Sot Toulf 150.9 702S1 47034 1235 CS. 245 Alf 14 1794 214 4439S 20513 74 37 US 73 f 1L17 34.4 13634 33342 1143 54 111 104 14 1770 Cw Or fek e71 N"1 Groae`6'ater Cise4�arpes Acres Cm TM T11 TP PIP co Oil 1 Great nat Acres CCU TNR 711 7T 0?1 1 all PIP 2e M Grow* CCDC61 TT4 TP ?% 2+ Cs Crew* Park OrsarSpect 0 •' G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . a 0 0 0 0 Lev Dantity, SeheeYflnetttetio4�lt 0 I6.4 0 MA 0 4162 0 44 0 7.6 0 a 0 0 2.1 207.4 1133.4 13.6 2.7 0.0 0.! 0 1 0 a 4.4 0 331,3 4 1579.7 1 22.2 0 4.3 7 1.4 1 1.4 0 0 • 0 FteEfea D.r'attT 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 2S 345 5653 19.9 10.4 0 0 0 0 a 0- 0 1 1 1 a a 9 Comareiolf0`rlee 0t,4 15019.7 1117637 0 970.2 0 62 0 $10.% • 97.5 a 0 0 6.0 73.E 1106 34.9 7.3 9 1 .2 0 75.9 247.5 40+36.3 117.3 24.4 3.1 3.3 .6 0 HIPL Daeattr Ursa 71 eS562.9 01IH.9 506.3 SC.6 231.1 763 0 0 6 ST.2 17.7 53622.4 23930.5 97644.7 175.E 47060.9 291.4 27.6 26.1 1ai.9 130.7 36.E 0 0 39.1 23171.1 453S7.1 257.3 24.3 124.3 3R.6 0 0 Hipiwaj 66.1 196025.9 71205.9 3509.9 141.7 $90.7 330.E 47.2 6139.E 35.2 101611 3i9SS.6 1971.3 13.4 306.2 39.4 171.4 0 24.3 0 313.25 23 34 . 15603.8 251116 31207.3 S66I6.4 173.4 2960.6 17.4 116.3 M.7 405.E 26.1 I71.4 0 34.E 0 5049.7 Sat lctals 253.9 20"1 276219 47M 262 IIS4 SO 41 6140 165.0 1SIS90 U9676 2 " U4 W 261 2S 3143 151.5 20OS64 142126 3S39 164 706 341 40 5049 Totals 4a0.0 360412 S2sw 6035 1a? 1401 61f 41 7034 DLI 20419E 190169 4345 05 M 344 34 4310 166.1 264'M 177479 444 242 lie 449 34 SM 04ss6 lust Tsar 200E 911 Use Load AWwslep-fft 7.6 Acres of Migh"y pAf* ylaAef AMnea111 743 Ibbl'blilk's" Cerr••t if96 Trait 0f Drslaa0a WOJU a»1 FnOA on%g towtiew ea EXHIBIT 5-8 QMNIQWN IRBI PUBLIC AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS WITH WATER QUALITY INTERESTS Dade County Department of Environmental Resource Management. DERM Florida Department of Environmenal Regulation, FDER United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA South Florida Water Management District, SFWMD Florida Department of Natural Resources, FDNR - Florida Marine Patrol Florida Coastal Zone Management South Florida Regional Planning Council, SFRPC United States Army Corps of Engineers United States Geological Survey, USGS United States Department of Interior National Parks Service. IMPS United States Department of Commerce - National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration, NOAA Biscayne Bay Management Committee, BBMC Miami River Management Committee, MRMC + City of Miami Public Works Dade County Public Works Florida Department of Transportation, FDOT Waterfront Control Board Port of Miami Downtown Development Authority University of Miami Rosenstiel Institute of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences EXHIBIT 5-9 BISCAYNE BAY WATER OUALITY STANDAFDS MARINE WATERS Aluminum 1.5 m,1/1 Nickel 0.1 mg/l Amonia 0.5 mg/l as N (1) Nutrients No Imbalance of natural flora and fauna Antimony 0.2 " Oil and Grease Arsenic 0.5 " (1) Bacteria 200 ! 100 ml - 70/100 ml Pthalate Esters 3.0 ug/1 Shellfish Waters (1) Polychlorinated Biphenyis 0.001 ugll Beryllium 1.1 mg/1 Radioactive Substances - Gross Beta Biological Integrity >759 <1000 Uuc (1) Bromine 100 mg/1 Selenium 0.025 mg/l Cadmium 5.0 " Silver 0.05 ug/l Chlorides <110% background (1) Specilic Conductance <2005 Background (1) Chromium 0.05 mg/1 (1) Sulfides 1.0 mg/1 (1) Copper 0.015 " Total Dissolved Gases <110% saturation Cyanide 5.0 " - Mine detectable (1) Transparency >90% background Dissolved Oxygen 5.0 " (daily average) Turbidity 50, except after heavy rains (1� Dissolved Oxygen 4.0 " No Event < Zinc 0.03 m9/1 Flouride 5.0 " fig: Chapter 17-3.121 FAC (1) Dade County Standard where Iron 0.3 " more stringent Lead 0.03 " (Fresh water standard) - 0.35 (1) Mercury 0.1 ug/1 - None Detectable (1) Pesticidas: Aldrin 0.003 ug/l Heptaclor 0.001 ug/1 Chlordane 0.004" Lindane 0.004" DDT 0.001", Nalathion 0.1" Demeton 0.1" Methoxychlor 0.03" Endosulfan 0.001" Myrex 0.001" Endrin 0.004" - Parathion 0.04" Guthion 0.01" Toxaphene 0.0050 �a EXHIBIT 5-10 STORMWATER OPTIONS WATER QUALITY IMPACT DOWNTOWN MIAMI DRI Most Desirable 1. On -site Retention in grassed swales/dry retention area with infiltration by percolation. 2. On -site Detention in grassed swales/dry retention area with infiltration by underdrain to stormwater outfalls. 3. On -site Retention with grease interceptor and drainage well to Saltwater aquifer. 4. On -site Retention with seepage systems (french drain, exfiltration trench, soakage pit) to shallow freshwater aquifer. Notes 1. Systems required for regulatory compliance. 2. Ongoing maintenance of system and periodic crater quality testing for efficiency is required of all systems EXHIBIT 5-11 SURFACE AND GROUNDWATER MONITORING CAPITAL AND OPERATING COST ,Surface Water Monitoring: I. Capital Expense Flow measurement equipment S 1.000 $ 1,000 II. Operating Expense: ...........................................................s -0- First Year Operation Total $ 1,000 �t 'Flow measurements at 20 outfalls will be carried out by Public Works Staff Groundrgter SAMpling: Deep well and retention system - 5 year test. Two Sites (Four sample points each 1 surface rater, 3 wells) Sampling schedule 1 per quarter for 1 year then trice per year for 4 year. I. Capital Expense: 6 wells 8 $2 400 =.......................................... $12,0O0 II. Operating Expense: A. First year sampling 8 (4 x 750)__.......,................... $24,00O Next 4 year 8 (2 x $750) _::::...:.:::.:::.:::.:...::::::: $124O0 Sampl ing parameters: - COD, TNR, TN, TP, Pb. -Cu; Zn; V i TDS, and Oil and Grease B. Upgrade USES Annual Well Sampling Expense 10 parameters Cost of sampling and reporting 1,000/saaple: 3 existing wells 2 times/year x $4 00O = .................. S 6,000 First Year Operation Total 1309000. . Year 2-5 Operation Total $18#000 Annual S 6,000 Private Developer Responsibility per Development Order jb)) to PERFORATED PIPE $LrcTIONv.tSEE NOTE 3) FRANC AND COVER FOR OPEN JOINT Illy USE le WIDE (S.D.- 2.3)- Typ. BANDS W/No BASKET. a 'd-w FELT M. 47PEA ROCK IjjjllPE SLOPE AS REQUIRED SEE OTE PLASTIC so ft tR /--m LLAST VE flE I RDCx- TECORRUGATE METAL_u WATER TA LE--%_ OEE 90 1.3 SHEETS t 06 AS EXFILTRATIOM TRENCH �LEKGT" REQUIRED LONGITUDINAL. SECTION_ TRANSVERSE SECTION- lm. TO AASHTO SPECIFICATIONS L PLASTIC FILTER fASAIC. EACH SIDE, OVERLAPPED & PERFWTH)NS t ACCORO74INQ ON TOP, SMALL BE USED IN SANDY AREAS AS M36-74 AND M196-. NOTED ON PLANS AND/OR AS DIRECTED BY THE 4.EXFIL"ATION TRENCH BOTTOM ELEVATION I-Mol EWANEER. OR AS oTmEfmsE OFTERAONED TKRGUGN APPROVED IL THE CONTRACTOR HAS THE OPTION Of INSTALLING DEAN METORD2 AND TESP. THE FoLLowms PIPE TYPK&g S, PIFROM 15 UP TO 14 6 DIAMETER CAN K USED. comimato STEEL - INITUIUNDUS COATED 90TH NOES (mromATro). L CORAU"MO ALWOUIA IFEAPOR"16 BI 0111ELD CONDITIONS PERMITTING. AINam PIPE iff'r. UEO-6t OR CDRST. .- larcm DCEI¢N WTER TE4L OALuOMT P0;X PAV , T PrsTouTION R-PI irru coloss tote. "if ASK METRO DADE EUBLIC STANDARDS FRENCH DRAINDETAIL C� STREET RUNOFF UPGRADE DETAIL 'NOTE: DESIGNED TO CAPTURE TO let INCH FLOW FROM DRAINAGE WATERSHED. STORMWATER DETENTION / GRASSED BASIND (' RETENTION CASE Z y AREA U.:DERDRAIN Y OUTFACE TO FLOW'--�►" OVERFLOW SURFACE WATER BAFFLED EXI8TINA 8TORMWATER SHUNT OUTFALL REFURBISHED STORM COLLECTION-BY8TEM Qi SIDEWALK EXISTING ROAD CAASE, XX `1 FLOW '1 r __._ TO SURFACE —LO"W-__ EXI8T.11 STORM OUTFALL WATER 81DEWACK y O PROI BED PERCOLATION OR EXFIL (RATION UNDERDRAIN OR DEEP DRAINAGE WELL ALTERNATE. EXHIBIT 5-13 P] ..i Exhibit 5-14 Alleman. R, aiscayne a" JAW Do lixi-c DA%ehu DAU ADd I1eIId AnAlv. Rogrt 1972-19 ,, DERM 1985, Beaven, T.R. , and McPherson, B.F. , DAAI Uy Pf IhA KaUr -in AM= QQnds p� .4 ma� iQr LU�hM in a ehang.L pAA Q9inUA_ f IpX"A, sober - November 1977, U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 78-1029. Biscayne Bay Management Committee. Apt Bw-ar-t " ___ Pf 1bJQ BAY! City of Miami Storm Sewer Program ( Storm Outfall Modifications) City of Tampa, JAMpA hationvjda Urban Buagff f raaram Phase II Final Report, October 1983. Corcoran, Eugene F., Brown, M.S., Braddour, F., Chasens, S.A., Freay, A.D. Biscayne B" dydrocarbc,1 ,SjUdy Final Hooct December 1983. Dade County Public Works, Section D4 Water r&ntrol A portion of Part-2 Public Works Manual. Dssian gtf Drain ,Structures JWA UPdat12011-X .fQE IJW .design At St= runof drag stcuglureso Dade County Department of Environmental Resource Management, December 1980. Developon Af gggional Imp& Reports: 1221 Brickell, Brickell Square, Masher/Lincoln, Port of Miami, S.E. Overtown/ParkWest, Tishman/Speyer. Library - South Florida Regional Planning Council (SFFPC). Dyer, Riddle, Mills and Precourt, Inc. for City of Orlando, Orlando UraII ;jors Water Management Manual (, N) Volume 2. Envi rex, Inc., Constituents 2f Highway Runoff Yi IMA IL Procedural Manual for monitoring of highway runoff, Federal Highway Administration, P881- 241903, February 1981. Envlrex Inc., Constituent s ,gf Highway Runof Molume I, Federal Highway Administraton P681-241895 1981s State of the Art Report. Environmental Committee of the Miami River task force - Mjhmi Rimer Outfal7 �X- ERQO, a division of Enseco, Inc., Ecological. Eyaluatjon of Wig Md oce4Air, discharge nt DrfAaed Material fm thi Miami il.#y21-&- FlorldV Department of the Army Jacksonville District. Corps of Engineers, September 20, 1985. ERGO, a division of Enseco, f _ac logical evaluation D1 pMpgsed gMeAni S -j schAW .gt rgdc. _ .i atC1 A I= jhUill Ha rlbo Turning Basin, FloriA Department of Army Jacksonville District, Corps of Engineers, September 20, 1985. Haire, M.J., Miller-o T, Price, C., Hayes, D., Kate RasoisMe ,QAte Florida. Water 1983 Volume 2A, South Florida Surfee Water USGS, MDR FL-83-2A. Haire, K.J., Price, C., Hayes, D., and Sonenshein, R. Water R AMUM I DAU E12LW WAUT- Year 1998a, Volumm 2F1, South Florida Groundwater USGS MDR FL- 83-2a. Hardee, Jack, Miller, Robert A., Mattraw, Harold, Jr., C., 5tor= tes -- R=ff Pafa fPl -4 iiJla. x A= 13rQXA Ed Cunt_v. EjPZida Judge, Robert M., JbA DjAjrjb4&jpa pf. Chum. LQAdjL Mg== Ard Zinc is Bisr-AXne DAY- 5VA1==5-, Department of Engineering Technology, School of Technology, Florida International University, May 1, 1980. Kohout, F.A., and Hartwell, J.H., WMID91C Ufa21 A= A EIW CgntM] ELM = rbanizati®n Df 2ASLQ f&n _v. ElQr AA, U.S. Geological Survey Report of Investigations Number 47. Lamb, Berton L., Water DjLajAjy Administra ton. A f 9-=,M Jwtion 2DA, Ann - Arbor Science 1980. Lazaro, T., Sitm Hydrology, 1979, Ann Arbor Science. Mattrav, H., R. Miller, Du ity PrQ=sies sar Three jjWA .. IL" AMASr.1l1BEGNAM linty• Fi�rjda, USGS WRI 81-23. Metro Dade Environmental Resource Management - JU 141AMI ,CApA] Stp DAU Metropolitan Dade County, Public Works Department, p.= j Standid Malls. 4 McKenzie, D.J. and G.A. Irvin, Plater AssesfiWnt gf StoMmater Runoff f=m a lax]lx used urban blgbt Y hr� .1a M1arm. Florida , U.S. Geological Survey MRI 83-4153. _ - Miami River Management Committee, Riami River, Poste ay, Tommar-mv Annual Report of the Miami River Management Committee 1985. Miami River Management Committee, Final Recommendations gf JIM Mj=i -Rive Management Co ittes, December 14, 1984. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NDAA), Ctirna alsxc ical DAtA January 1985 Volume 89, No.1 December 1985, Volume 89 No. 12 and Annual Summary 1984. National' Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Df Teamerat+ure, Precipitation, 11palth and Cgm,ing QfiarbA DIX 1951 - 1980, Cliemtograplhy of the United States No. 81. Overton, D., and Mcdays, M., St0ra .rx1 Academic Press, Inc. 1976. Poley, R., & T yen ,or Y Df Pei`! ,Rae , 02charnes UW thel lgadinas . majQsurfac eater bodies* Metro Dade DERM, 1981. Ryan, Jr. at al., I" Environmental Chemist af fly Estuaries -- n L---j njkanwatgr Ports Maintenance ftedgirIg.Study - Technical Report Number 1: Port of Miami and the Miami River, FDER 1984. Santon, et al., lister Eal tiQn Q5p-9-= 2f Street LULL ce CctntAMInants 1972, EPA PB-214 408. Savannah Laboratories and Environmental Sem ices, Inc., b Studv of lba effects 9f iAs f ratty the 114°d P�"x �£ J r ace metal nil -JA in M-u And sediments 1n Biscavpg BaX, Funded by Jacksonville, Florida U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Contract No. DACW 17-85-Yr-0908, February 1985. Schmidt, Stacy D., Spencer, Douglas R., lha FagnJimAQ at J=Z, e disc ar. ja ,sin urban storwater 2Y.51=, Journal Water Pollution Control Federation 58 No. 9, July 1986, PP. 744-747. South Florida Regional Planning Council, Dj.,scavne .DAx .d=atj ; Freserve Rules November 1976. South Florida Regional Planning Council, ducal .SsAt= abrzy .Gahm", July 1982. j , aan Syjt= Policy Guide# July 1982. South Florida Water Management District, CAS tRtual Appmxal RulQs Draft February 27, 1986. South Florida Water Management District, ManAg2ment .nd , toraaof Surface 11atgrs, Permit Information Manual Volume IV, January 1984. South Florida Water Management District, Summ S?f Ssudb Florida O Nanagmeent Permit Process .f= Surface Water dA (Drain ge) Szd ass Ajg Qf review ff= surface water management emit applications within tha South Florida Water Manaq=ntt District, May 1, 1986. Thorhaug, Anitra ed, Biscayne Bay: Past, Present, Future. A symposium Ef presented by t)e University of Miami, April 2-3, 1976. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jacksonville District, reoQrt = Miami River, Dade County Florida, March 1986. Van de Kreeks and Wang, J.D., HydrQgraphv Biscayne By Part j 89.sul:Ls gf Field Maasur_ents, University of Miami Rosenstiel *School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, January 1984. Van de Kreeks and Wang, J.D., Hvdresaraohv mf North BiscaynaBAY 4umt jj Modg].jng, University of Miami Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, January 1984. Waller, Bradley, G., Klein, H., Lefkoff. J., Attenuation Alf ,Stormatgr Contaminants fat Highway runoff within unsaturated Limestone. Florid. US Geological Survey )later Resource Invesltgations Report 844083. Wanielista, Dr. Martin, P.E., Yousef, Y., P.E., Golding, B., P.E., Cassagnol, E.I., Stormwater Management'Manual DER, University of Central Florida 1981. ��""17 ,. K 7 xCr^,a•.��... DOMNTOWN DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS The following drainage improvements have been scheduled for construction within the DRI area: 1. SR 972/SW 13th Street from SW 1st Ave to SW 2nd Ave. 2. SR 5/US 1/Brickell Ave. from SW 15 Rd. to SW 8 th Street 3. UnderwaX Phase I Downtown Street Improvement - Phase I NW 2nd Street NW 3rd Street - Biscayne to NW 1st Ave. NW 4th Street NW Miami Court - Fl agl er to N. 1st Street 4. Phase II ar ous Streets within Downtown Area S. Phase III YEAR COST (_) 1986-87 228,000 1990-91 3379000 1986 1,775 9905 1986-97 • 290001,000 Various Streets within Downtown Area 1.0oo_onn ' 01 J i -' 00 QUESTION 6s WETLANDS Not Applicable There are no wetland areas existing within the project area. l I I I QUESTION 7: FLOOD PRONE AREAS A. PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION OF FLOOD ELEVATION FOR THE AREA. INCLUDE MAP AND DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED REVISION, AS WELL AS EXISTING AND IDENTIFY SOURCE OF INFORMATION. The base flood elevations for the project area are shown on the Flood Zone Map. The majority of the ,project area is categorized as Zone A17 and varies in base flood elevations between 11 to 13 ft. above mean sea 1 level. The higher base flood elevations occur within proximity of the coastal areas or Miami River. Flood Zone A17, as well as zones A-14 and A-15 (also found throughout the project area), are part of the 100 year - flood area. There is a small portion of the project area immediately to the west of the Brickell corridor, which is classified as Zone B. This zone lies between the limits of the 100 year and 500 year flood. In some cases, this zone is applied to areas subject to 100 year flooding but with aver- age depths less than one (1) foot. In addition there is an area in the Central Business District and at the northwest section of the project area which lies outside the 100 year _ flood and is subject to minimal flooding. This area is classified as Zone C. The coastal areas are classified for the most part as Zone V-21. The base flood elevation in this zone varies from 13 to 14 ft. This zone is a special high hazard area since it is subject to coastal flooding with velocity. 1 I ,a J L_ _ (c) n � � � L - �U�7�..=:� : C_ J L L FLOOD ZONE MAPS = c Ci • sr. i Alb .»..`F ... Alb ..� ."'..� A17 V21 Ain rrr - MAP C-5 EATS ING FLOOD ZONES 1; DowNTOWN MASTERPLAN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT is FFl�yyC. B. PROVIDE FINISH FIRST FLOOR ELEVATIONS FOR STRUCTURES, ROADS AND PARKING LOTS In accordance with FEMA guidelines the lowest floor is defined to mean the lowest level of a building including a finished or unfinished base- ment, if any. However, it is important to note that the determination of the lowest floor elevation for a structure in a V-Zone, varies markedly from that of an A -Zone. For example, in a V-Zone the lowest floor eleva- tion is the underside of the supporting structure at the lowest level; whereas in an A -Zone it is the "finished floor" of the lowest level. The lowest floor elevation, or base flood elevation a5 shown on Map C, varies from 11 to 13 ft. for Zone A-17 and from 13 to 14 ft. for Zone V21. Grade elevation throughout the project areas varies from a low of 5 ft. above mean sea level to a maximum elevation of 11 ft. along certain por- tions of the ridge line. Although FEMA regulations do not apply to roads and other impervious sur- faces such as plazes and.surface parking lots, Metropolitan Dade County requires that these types of surface improvements be at or above 5 ft. above mean sea level. The minimum elevations for roads and surface parking lots, based on the County standards mentioned herein, are enforced by the City of Miami's Public Works Department. - -- Presently the Metropolitan Dade County Department of Environmental Re- sources Management (DERM) will review and into :et Federal guidelines on a project by project basis when construction involves the establishment of floor areas beneath the minimum or base flood elevation as illustrated in Map C. Essentially, non -habitable spaces such as a lower parking level, mechanical equipment rooms, elevator landings and machine roans, and simi- lar ty�z spaces are customarily accepted as exceptions to the Federal guidelines by DERM. It is possible that a large unobstructed assembly hall or a dining area, enclosed by "break -a -way" walls, would also be permitted below the base flood elevation. However, other types of deviations from -the base floor elevation will require the procurement of a variance from the Metropolitan Dade County Environmental Review Board (ERB). The ERB consists of five members appointed by the County Commission: (2) engineers and (3) scientists. The ERB meets monthly; and its decisions at County level are final. Appeals to the decision of the ERB must be filed with the Third District Court of Appeals. C. PROVIDE APPLICABLE STORM SURGE ELEVATIONS FOR THE AREA AND IDENTIFY SOURCE OF INFORMATION. There is no information available at the Metropolitan Dade County Depart- ment of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) in reference to appli- cable storm surge elevations for the area. The State of Florida Department of Natural Resources (DNR), Bureau of Beaches and Shores has a. study for storm surge elevations during a 100 year storm. The study indicates that during such a storm, the storm surge elevation would reach 14 ft. NGVD at Cape Florida, Key Biscayne; and about 13.75 ft. NGVD in Miami Beach. Under such conditions both barrier islands would be under water. The study does not analyze the f effect of the 100 year storm on the mainland. E �a 1' b. IDENTIFY CHANGES IN REGULATIONS AND PERMITTING PROCEDURES NECESSARY TO PROTECT PROPERTY FROM FLOODING AND STORM SURGE On October 1, 1981, the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) imple- mented a revised rating system for new or substantially improved buildings constructed in coastal high hazard areas of Regular Program communities, identified on Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) as V-Zones. The rating system within the project area applies to: 1. Buildings in special flood hazard Zones V21 with building permit applications dated on or after October 1, 1981; and 2. V21 Zone buildings on which the building permit was issued before October 1, 1981 whose construction did not begin within 180 days of the permit date, but begins after September 30, 1981. Under the new Coastal V-Zone Rating requirements, revised or calculated flood elevations, adjusted for wave height, are used in determining ac- tuarial insurance rates for new construction. Thus to avoid very high insurance rates, new construction should be elevated above these ad- justed flood elevations. On March 4, 1986, Metropolitan Dade County Board of County Commissioners adopted Dade County Ordinance 86-16 amending Chapter 23 of the South Florida Building Code (SFBC) to comply with the Florida Coastal Zone Pro- tection Act of 1985. The adopted ordinance requires that all construction within V-Zones, com- ply with the Coastal Zone Protection Act as a pre -requisite for obtaining a building permit. In addition to the above mentioned regulations the following is a listing of possible municipal regulations which could be of assistance in as- suring that private property will be properly protected from flooding and storm surge damage: 1_._Buildinq Permit Application Submittals: a. Letter from Department of Environmental Resources Management, stating the applicable base flood elevation for the subject property (currently not required). y 1 i f: [1 b. Provide a topographic survey, prepared by registered land sur- veyor establishing the elevations at critical points of the property and the elevation of adjoining streets, at their center- line (currently required). c. Provide a certificate signed and notarized, whereby the owner and applicant, if different than the owner, attest that the lowest floor elevation is in accordance with F.E.M.A. guide- lines and the 1985 Coastal Zone Protection Act. (Currently not required.) d. Provide a certificate from a land surveyor, registered it State of Florida, certifying the elevation of the lowest ti"r, prior to the construction of upper levels (currently required). In the cases where the property falls within a V-Zone, the appli- cation mist also incorporate a certification by either the struc- tural engineer or architect of record, providing evidence of the depth of structure at the lowest level (i.e. difference between finished floor elevation and the bottom of supporting structural members). This would amount to a "Post Construction Elevation Certificate (currently not required) 2. Structural and Architectural Certification All construction which falls within a V-zone, should be certified as to its capacity in regards to the following: (1) capacity of the structure to withstand velocity waters and hurricane wash; (2) condition of any non -habitable areas which may lie beneath the base flood elevation, as being "water -tight". The certification for item (1), is to be provided by a structural engineer registered in the State of Florida; and the certification for item (2), is to be provided by an architect registered in the State of Florida. 3. Grade and Basement Elevation Permits All surface related improvements (i.e. plazas, surface parking lots and roads) which fall within the V-zone, should be at a minimum 5 ft. elevation above mean sea level. In cases where the basements or lower parking levels -of buildings are located below the minimum, 5 ft. level, pumps connected to the build- ing's emergency generator must be provided to remove any potential water seepage. 4. Structural Flood Proofing In the event that the lowest floor elevation of a structure, or por- tion thereof, used for habitable purposes is situated below the minimum base flood elevation, then that portion of the structure below the min imum base flood elevation rust be designed in accordance with struc- tural flood ►roofing guidelines entitled "Floodproofing Non -Residential Structures", May 1986 Edition, published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Copies of this report may be obtained at the Dade County Department of Public forks. In particular, structural flood proofing of ground floor retail areas may be achieved through the utilization of "drop -in" panels at openings such as doors, breeze -ways, etc. Display windows and store- front may be protected through the use of watertight aluminum flood shields. Property owners who can not meet the FEMA guidelines for structurally flood proof construction of areas below the minimum base flood elevation Rust apply for a waiver or variance with the Department of Environmental Resources Management, Dade County. QUESTION 8: VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE A. IDENTIFY EXISTING VETETATION IN THE STUDY AREA. SPECIFY ANY PLANT SPECIES LOCATED WITHIN THE PROJECT BOUNDARIES THAT'ARE LISTED AS RARE, ENDANGERED OR THREATENED. Due to the highly urbanized character of the Miami Central Business Dis- trict and other parts of the project area, there is virtually no origi- nal natural vegetation present. Landscape plants and ornamentals occur in various open spaces throughout the project area, but no significant vegetative associations can be identified. The majority of the vegetation in the project area can be found in the four municipal parks which are owned and maintained by the City of Miami. (Refer to Map F, Vegetation Map). There is also a small vest pocket park fronting on Flagler Street, but its vegetation is limited to several ornamental shade trees. 1. Brickell Park 2. Bayfront Park 3. Bicentennial Park 4. Fort Dallas Park The remainder of the vegetation throughout the project area is extremely localized and falls into one of the three following categories: 1. Planting along public right of ways: The most prominent street tree plantings occur along Biscayne Boule- vard. Throughout the project area, either the median or the median and sidewalk areas are planted with royal palms, queen palms and Washingtonian palms. These tali specimens provide this portion of the project area with a distinguished landmark quality and an ele- ment of design continuity which should be enhanced and protgcted. Other streets such as Flagler Street, Brickell Avenue, Brickell Plaza and Southeast 15th Road have ornamental street plantings. However, the plantings along these public right of ways could be improved to provide a more pleasant visual effect within the scale and context of the various street environments. A well coordinated tree planting program throughout the project area's public right-of-ways, could have a most dramatic effect in enhancing the scale and comfort of the street environment for t w t, VEGETATION rb� 910091 man or Now Tit, -COW*" &06*4408 C<*OAWft ML 1� 'D&M Komar And A&6w-AA� 6r_ KLAd AAd Vwe. 6-r. MAP F VEGETATION DowNTOWN 10 ASTERPLAN MVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACY pedestrians. Street tree planting programs are the single most im- portant vegetation element in urbanized areas. The City of Miami's Downtown Development Authority has in the past proposed to replace the Flagler Street vegetation with a more appropriate landscape program, given the scale, retail character and level of traffic along this street. 2. Planting Along Major Public Capital Improvements: The planting of trees, shrubbery and ground cover as part of major public improvements represents the second category of localized vegetation. The following projects lend themselves to the i-Tple- mentation of planting programs: a. The Downtown People Mover Station Areas. b. The Brickell and Government Center Rapid Transit Station Areas. c. The Miami River Walk. d. The Interstate Expressway/Ramp System Right -Of -Ways. e. The Government Center f. Bayside g. Miami Dade Junior College h. Metrorail Right -Of -Way 3_ Plantings as Part of Major Private Projects: Except for certain projects along the Brickell corridor, the atten- tion to vegetation and tree planting has played a minor role in private developments throughout the project area. A greater atten- tion to street level planting and the use of natural vegetation to provide focal points, shade, transition and buffer zones, etc., should be encouraged in all new construction. There are no*endangered.or.threatened vegetation associations throughout the study' -*area: However"; City of Miami records and surveys conducted as part of this study indicate that the following species can be found in the following public parks: '+ • 1. Brickell Park: Sap.9tilla, Seagrape (5), Red Mahogany, -Silk Oak, Black Olive, Ficus Rubiginossa, Gold Malayan Coconut Palm (12), Mahogany, Reclinata and Gumbo Limbo. "" 84S .. - 0 B. I 9 Bayfront Park: The areas immediately to the east and northeast of the Miami Public Library Building contain some of the most exotic species found any- where in the study area. The City of Miami is taking measures to relocate or preserve species as part of the Bayfront Park redevelop- ment. The park includes amongst its landscape inventory the follow- ing specimens: Tabebuia Pallida, Raphis Excelsa, Roystonea Elata, Ficus Benjamina, Podocarpus Macrophylla, Bursera Simaruba, Cocos Nucifera, Monstera Deliciosa, Citrus Aurantium, Tabebuia Argentia, etc. 3. Bicentennial Park: Bicentennial Park once featured a rich variety of plant specimens such as the following: Tabebuia Argentias, Tabeburia Pallida, Delonix Regia, Sabal Palmetto, Ficus Nitida, Cocos Nurifera, Swietenia Ma- hogany, Roystonea Regia, etc. However with the development of sport fields and the track for the Miami Grand Prix, the majority of these specimens have been removed by the City. IDENTIFY WILDLIFE SPECIES, INCLUDING BIRDS. REPTILES, AMPHIBIANS, FISH, INVERTEBRATES AND MAMMALS, THAT USE THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AREA. SPECIFY ANY WILDLIFE SPECIES WITHIN THE PROJECT BOUNDARIES THAT ARE RARE, ENDANGERED OR THREATENED. Because of the urbanized nature of the project area, no significant, rare, endangered or threatened wildlife occur. Wildlife in the project area is restricted to species which are adaptable to an urban environment. A visual inspection of open spaces throughout the project area confirmed no evidence of burrows or nestings which might be an indication of certain rare,.endangered or threatened wildlife. The only dildlife that has been seen throughout the project area has been limited to pigeons, detected mostly around the Biscayne Boulevard/Bayfront Park area; and around the County Courthouse on Flagler Street. Pelicans also habitat at the Miamarina basin marina and Plaza Venetia Marina next to the Venetian causeway. � r Migratory birds such as blue jays, cardinals, ducks; and on several oc- casions squirrels and possums have been seen at Bayfront Park and Brickell Park. Manatees have been frequently sited along the Miami River. They represent an endangered specie of mammals that need to be protected from recreationaly commercial boating and fishing. � s � 2 C. SPECIFY ACTIONS WHICH WILL BE UNDERTAKEN TO MITIGATE OR MINIMIZE IMIPACT ON VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE Due to the non-existence of any rare, endangered or threatened vegetation or wildlife throughout privately owned properties within the project area, there are no specific actions which will be required to protect or mini- mize iipact on such species. Existing trees planted in the public right-of-way should be protected by the use of temporary guards during periods of construction. The temporary guards are to be furnished and installed by the contractor so that the trees in question may be protected against damage resulting from contact with moving equipment or deposits of soil/fill above exposed root systems or trunks. I D. SPECIFY THE REGULATIONS, PERMITTING PROCEDURES AND OR RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS THAT WILL PROTECT SIGNIFICANT VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE. All construction plans for projects which adjoin a landscaped public right-of-way or open space system should incorporate the following draw- ings, details and notations as a part of the permit set of construction docu-cents as a pre -requisite to the issuance of a building permit by the City of Miami: a. Temporary tree guards are to be furnished and installed by the Con- tractor at every tree location within the public right-of-way, situated within twenty-five feet of the construction activity or limit of construction (i.e. construction fence or barricade). Exceptions would apply to interior renovations; and exterior reno- vations where the cost of construction is under ten thousand dollars ($10,000). b. Adjoining public right-of-ways and open space system are to be kept free of any dust, debris or foreign substances. All landscaping material (i.e. tree planting, shrubbery and ground cover) should meet the City of Miami standards, as per Sections 2022.2 and 2008.8 of City of Miami Zoning Ordinance 9500. Chapter 17 of the Miami City Code, entitled Environmental Preservation requires a tree removal permit for any tree removal, relocation or development activity affecting trees on pri- vate property within commercial and multifamily districts. The Criteria for Tree Removal in Section 17-9(A) should be strictly enforced and the conditions for tree relocation and replacement in Section 17-9(6) should be maximized. The standards for tree protection during construction, contained in Section 17-10 should be enforced. It is recommended that landscaping design guidelines be established to assist in the development of well balanced landscaped treatments along public right-of-ways and private property. The design guidelines should provide for type of planting, spacing, etc. for different urban locations. Specific attention should be pAid to edge conditions: curb/pavement; sidewalk/private property; median planting; corner b intersection; pedestrian crosswalks, plazas, etc. A suggested landscaping list of native plants and ornamentals suitable for use in South Florida urban environments developed during the planning and design process of the Dade County mass transit system by the County con- sultants (i.e. KTG) and staff: � a • SUGGESTED PLANT LIST BOTANICAL NAME PROCUREMEM SPECIFICATIONS (COMMAN NAME) HEIGHT SPREAD CALIPER Achras zapota Sapodilla 12 ft: 6 ft: 3-1/2 in. Allamanda hendersoni 30 in. 24 in. Brown Bud Allamanda Alpinia nutans 5 ft. 6 ft. Shell Ginger Anthurium huegelii 30 in. 24 in. N.C.N Archontophoenix alexandraw 10 ft. Alexandra Palm Bauhinia Blaleana Hong Kong Orchid 12 ft. 8 ft. 3-1/2 in Bougainvillea (variety) 3 ft. 3 ft. Bougainvillea Bucida buceras Black Olive 12 ft. 7 ft. 3-1/2 in. z Bursera simaruba 12 ft. 8 ft. D 4 in. } Gumbo Limbo t.. Caladium bicolor (Hoyt. Var) 12 in. Caladium • F. Callistemon rigidus 12 ft. 6 ft. Stiff Bottlebrush Callistemon vir inalis 12 ft. 8 ft. Weeping Bottlgbrush Calophyllum antillanum 12 ft. 8 ft. 3 in. Calaba Carissa grandiflora (boxwood beauty) 15 in. 24 in. Natal Plum - Carissa grandiflora (emerald blanket) 16 in. 30 in. N.C.N. BOTANICAL NAME (COMMON NAME) PROCUREMENT SPECIFICATIONS . HEIGHT SPREAD CALIPER Cassia beareana 8 ft. 8 ft. Bears Shower Cassia fistula 14 ft. ft. 3 in. Golden Shower9 Chamaedorea erumpens 8 ft. 5 ft. Bamboo Palm Chamaedorea seifritzii 8 ft. 5 ft. N.C.N Chamaerops humilis 5 ft. 6 ft. European Fan Palm - Chrysalidocarpus lutescens 42 ft. 9 ft. Areca Palm Chrysobalanus icaco (green) Coco Plum 24 in. 18 in. Chrysotalanus Icaco (Red Tip) 18 in. 12 in. - Red Tip Coco Plum Chrysophyllum oliviforme 12 ft. 7 ft. 2 1/2 in. Satin leaf Citris mitis 12 ft. 7.ft. 3 in. Calamondin Coccolobis diversifolia (Floridana) 12 ft. 6 ft. 3 1/2 in. Pigeon Plum Coccolobis uvifera 8 ft. 5 ft. Seagrape Cocos nuciferaL (Malayan Green) N� �N Malayan Coconut Codiaeum variegatum (Broadleaf) 24 in. 15 in. Croton (variety) - Conocarpus erects 12 ft. 9 ft. Green Buttonwood BOTANICAL NAME (COMMON NAME) PROCUREMENT SPECIFICATIONS HEIGHT SPREAD CALIPER Cortaderia selloana 3 ft. 3 ft. Pampasgrass Crinum asiat.icum 4 ft. 4 ft. Crinum lily Delonix regia 16 ft. 16 ft. 4 in. Royal Poinciana Dizygotheca elegantissima 10 ft. 5 ft. Threadleaf Falsearalia Dracaena aborea 4 ft. 2 ft. N.C.N. Dracaena draco Dragon dracaena 4 ft. 3 ft. Dracaena marginata 6 ft. 3 1/2 ft. Dracena Eriobotrya japonica 12 ft. 8 ft. 2 1/2 in. Loquat Eugenia jambos 12 ft. 8 ft. 2 1/2 in. Rose Apple Ficus Jacquiniaefolia 12 ft. 10 ft. 3 in. Jacquinia fig Ficus rubiginosa 12 ft 8 ft. 3 in. Rusty fig Garcinia spicata 8 ft. 4 ft. Garcinia Gymnanthes lupida 6 ft. 3 ft. Oysterwood 11 ex vomitoria (nana) 10 in. 16 in. Dwarf Yaupon Holly Ixora coccinea Jungleflame Ixora .-: in. 16 in. t BOTANICAL NAME PROCUREMENT SPECIFICATIONS (COMMON NAME) HEIGHT SPREAD CALIPER Jacaranda acutifolia 12 ft. 7 ft. 2 1/2 in. Jacaranda Jasminum multiflorum (putescens) 18 in. 20 in. Furry Jasmine Jatropha hastata 6 ft. 5 ft. Jatropha Lagerstroemia indica 12 ft. 7 ft. Crapemyrtle Lagerstroemia speciosa 12 ft. 8 ft. Queen Crapemyrtle Leea coccinea 4 ft. 3 ft. N.C.N. Ligustrum lucidum 12 ft. 10 ft. Glossy Privet Liriope muscari (evergreen giant) 14 in. -- - Malpighia coccigera 16 in. 16 in. Holly Malpighia Mimusop roxburghiana 12 ft. 8 ft. Mimusops Murraya paniculata 30 in. 20 in. Orange Jasmine Murraya paniculata (Lakeview) 36 in. 30 in. N.C.N. Myrica cerifera 12 ft. 10 ft. Southern Waxmyrtle Nerium oleander (calypso) 4 ft. 3 ft. Oleander Nerium oleander (Salmon) 18 in. 18 in. Dwarf Oleander Nerium oleander (white) 4 ft. 3 ft. White Oleander Noronhia emarginata 12 ft. 7 ft. 3 in. Noronhia BOTANICAL NAME PROCUREMENT SPECIFICATIONS COM ON NAME) HEIGHT SPREAD CALIPER Ophiopogon japonica 8 in. 8 in. Monco Grass Paurotis wrighti Paurotis Palm 20 ft. 15 ft. Philodendron selioum 2 ft. 3 ft. Self -heading Philodendron Phoenix roebeleni 5 ft. 5 ft. Dwarf Date Palm Pittosporum tobira (green) 24 in. 24 in. Pittosporum Pittosporun tobir (Variegata) 24 in. 24 in. Varigated Pittosporum Pleomela reflexa 6 ft. ft. .C.N. N.C.N. Podocarpus graciliar 8 ft. 6 ft. Weeping Podocarpus Podocarpus macrophyllus 8 ft. 3 ft. Podocarpus Psidium cattlelanum 10 ft. 6 ft. Cattley Guave Ptychosperma macarthuri 10 ft. 6 ft. Macarthur Palm Quercus virginiana Live Oak 12 ft. 6 ft. 3 in. Raphiolepsis Ipdica 1 24 in. 24 in. Indio Hawthorn Ravenala madagascariensis 12 ft. 10 ft. Travelers Palm Rhoeo berrrrudiana Dwarf Oyster Plant !0 in. !0 in. Sabal palmetto Sabal Palm "-" Spathyphyilum (cleveiandii) 12 in. 12 in. N.C.N. It BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME) PROCUREMENT SPECIFICATIONS HEIGHT SPREAD CALIPER Streiitzia nicolai _ White Bird of Paradise 30 in. "'" Strelitzia reginae Bird of Paradise 18 in. 12 in. Swietenia mahagoni Mahogany 12 ft. 7 ft. 3 tn. Tabebuia argentea Gold Tree 16 ft. 8 ft. Tabebuia pailida Cuban Trumpet .12 ft. 7 'ft. 4 in. Tamarindus indica Tamarind 12 ft. 7 ft. 2 1/2 in. Thrinas parviflora 5 ft. --- Thatch Key Palm Trachelospermum jasminoides 3 ft. --- Confiderate Jasmine Viburnum suspensum Sandankwa 30 in. ` 18 in. Washingtonia robusta Washington Palm Wedelia trilobata 6 in. --- Wedeiia Yucca elephantipes 6 ft. --- Bulbstem Yucca Zamia floridana 18 in. 18 in. Coontie Zamia Furfuracea 24 in. 30 in. Scurfy Zamia Zebrina pendula 6 in. --- Wandering Jew Sodding (Bahia)/Bitter Blue Grass Seed (Bahia) / Argentine 86-84::' QUESTION 9: HISTORICAL AND ARCHEOLOGICAL SITES A. IDENTIFY AND DESCRIBE EACH SITE SHOWN ON MAP D. SPECIFY THE SITES THAT ARE LISTED IN OR APPEAR TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR LISTING IN THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES; THOSE SITES THAT HAVE BEEN DESIGNATED OR APPEAR TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR DESIGNATION UNDER A MUNICIPAL ORDINANCE; THOSE SITES THAT HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN A COUNTY HISTORIC SURVEY; THOSE SITES IDENTIFIED BY TI' FLORIDA DIVISION OF ARCHIVES, HISTORY AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT; AND AN', SITES IDENTIFIED BY A COUNTY ARCHAEOLOGIST. Between 1978 and 1980, the Metro -Dade Historic Preservation Division conducted the Dade County Historic Survey. Florida Master Site File forms were completed for each property and forwarded to the Florida Division of Archives, History and Records Management (DAHRM). Included within the Downtown Master Plan area were 241 individual properties of varying degrees of significance, as well as several archeological sites. In 1985- 1986, the City of Miami Planning Department updated the results of the Dade County Historic Survey, and photographed all properties. This re- survey revealed that approximately one-third of the original 241 properties had been demolished. The City of Miami Planning Department, in conjunction with the DAHRM, the Metro -Dade Historic Preservation Division, and other local professionals representing the disciplines of history, architecture, architectural history, and planning, carefully evaluated the remaining properties. Currently, eight (8) of these buildings are listed in the National Register of Historic Places and seven (7) have been determined eligible for listing. Twenty-two (22) buildings, one (1) object, and three (3) historic districts were identified by the evaluation panel as potentially eligible for the National Register and/or local historic site designation. Listed in Exhibit 9-1 and located on Map 0-2 are those properties that are listed in or appear to be eligible for the National Register. Ten (10) of these properties have already been designated as local historic sites under the City of Miami's Heritage Conservation Ordinance. All properties listed in Exhibit 9-1 are eligible for designation. Additional properties from the Dade County Historic Survey, particularly those rated "1" for architectural or historic significance, may also be eligible for local designation as further documentation is uncovered. The ten (10) City of Miami historic sites are identified as CMHS in Exhibit 9-1. Properties included in the Dade County Historic Survey are identified in Exhibit 9-2. At the request of the City of Miami Planning Department, the Dade County Archeologist has identified eleven (11) archeological zones. The zones are listed in Exhibit 9-3 and are located on Map D-3. Each zone is further described in the archeological management plan in Section 9-7. B. INCLUDE A LETTER FROM THE FLORIDA DIVISION OF ARCHIVES, HISTORY AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT, AND THE COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE, INDICATING THE COMPLETENESS OF THE LIST. 4-1 86-81EA' A letter from DAHRM indicating the completeness of the 1 ist, is included as Exhibit 9-4. A similar letter from the Metro -Dade Historic Preservation Division is included as Exhibit 9-5. C. SPECIFY ACTION THAT WILL BE TAKEN TO COMPLETE THE RESEARCH NECESSARY TO NOMINATE AND/OR DESIGNATE THE SITES LISTED ABOVE. SPECIFY THE REGULATIONS AND PERMITTING PROCEDURES NEEDED TO PROTECT AND ENCOURAGE THE PRESERVATION OR THOROUGH EXCAVATION OF THE SITES LISTED ABOVE. The City of Miami Planning Department, in conjunction with the DAHRM and the Dade County Archeologist, has developed management plans for both historic and archeological sites. These plans are included as Exhibits 9- 6 and 9-7. fto I j i F--V-Yt 4q.: I WA'. E 1. 2. 3. 4. S. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. EXHIBIT 914 PROPERTIES LISTED IN OR POTENTIALLY ELIGIBLE FOR THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES ADORES$ 10 Biscayne Boulevard 204 Biscayne Boulevard 540 Biscayne Boulevard 600 Biscayne Boulevard 1300 Biscayne Boulevard 1401 Biscayne Boulevard 501 Brickell Avenue 609 Brickell Avenue 169 E. Flagler Street 174 E. Flagler Street 200 E. Flagler Street 303 E. Flagler Street 73 W. Flagler Street 401-47 N. Miami Avenue 1367 N. Miami Avenue 1401 N. Miami Avenue 1000 S. Miami Avenue 1023 S. Miami Avenue 1150 S. Miami Avenue 100 N. E. 1 Avenue 117 N. E. 1 Avenue 140 N. E. 1 Avenue 300 N. E. 1 Avenue 500 N. E. 1 Avenue 1221-27 N. E. 1 Avenue 120 N. E. 1 Street 139 N. E. 1 Street ` 121 S. E. 1 Street 168 S. E. 1 Street 111 N. E. 2 Avenue 25 S. E. 2 Avenue 118-30 N. E. 2 Street 60 S. E. 4 Street 22 N. E. 5 Street 49 N. W. 5 Street 10, 14, 18, 28, 38 S. E. 6 Street 190 S. E. 12 Terrace HISTORIC KW MCAII inter Hotel Berni Apartments Texaco Gas Station Freedom Tower Sears, Roebuck and Co. Shrine Building Brickell Mausoleum First Presbyterian Church Alfred I. duPont Building Olympia Theater and Office Building Walgreens Elks Lodge No. 948 Dade County Courthouse and Miami City Hall Chaille Block Citizens Bang Fire Station No. 2 Fire Station No. 4 Martina Apartments Wilford H. Burkhart House Old U.S. Post Office and Courthouse Security Building Hahn Building U.S. Post Office and Courthouse Central Baptist Church Kentucky Home Shorel and Arcade Meyer -Kiser Building City National Bank Building Huntington Building Congress Building Ingraham Building Gesu Church and Rectory Royal Palm Cottage William H. Chaille House Salvation AraW Citadel Southeast 6th Street Row Dr. James Jackson Office CAWMT* NR/CMHS DOE NR/CMHS DOE/CMHS DOE (433- 443 only) NR 0 DOE CMHS NR CMHS NR/CMHS CMHS DOE DOE/CMHS 9-3 38. 45 S. W. 13 Street Southside School 39* 464 N. E. 16 Street Trinity Episcopal Church WR 40: E. Flagler Street, N.E. I Downtown Miami Commercial Street, N. Miami Avenue Historic District Vicinity *CATIEGORY: NR - National Register - listed DOE - National Register - determination of eligibility CNHS - City of Miami Historic Site 9-4 86-84S it 0 Ll Exhibit 94 PROPERTIES INCLUDED IN THE DADE COUNTY HISTORIC SURVEY Bayfront Paris Brickell Park 10 Biscayne Boulevard 50 Biscayne Boulevard 204 Biscayne Boulevard 244 Biscayne Boulevard 540 Biscayne Boulevard 600 Biscayne Boulevard 666 Biscayne Boulevard 666 Biscayne Boulevard (rear) 1040 Biscayne Boulevard 1300 Biscayne Boulevard 1325 Biscayne Boulevard 1401 Biscayne Boulevard 609 Brickell Avenue 1432 Brickell Avenue 1435 Brickell Avenue 1438 Brickell Avenue 1440 Brickell Avenue 1441 Brickell Avenue 22 E. Flagler Street 23 E. Flagler Street 30 E. Flagler Street 44 E. Flagler Street 51 E. Flagler Street 54 E. Flagler Street 156-60 E. Flagler Street 169 E. Flagler Street 174 E. Flagler Street 200 E. Flagler Street 269 E. Flagler Street 303 E. Flagler Street 19 W. Flagler Street 73 W. Flagler.Street 228 W. Flagler Street 328-48 W. Flagler Street 350 W. Flagler Street 27-29 N. Miami Avenue 30 N. Miami Avenue 145 N. Miami Avenue 218 N. Miami Avenue 400 N. Miami Avenue 401-405 N. Miami Avenue 419 N. Miami Avenue 428 N. Miami Avenue 433-443 N. Miami Avenue 699 N. Miami Avenue 716 N. Miami Avenue 800 N. Miami Avenue 943 N. Miami Avenue 1036 N. Miami Avenue 1050 N. Miami Avenue 1237 N. Miami Avenue 1334-1336 N. Miami Avenue 1367 N. Miami Avenue 1401 N. Miami Avenue 2 S. Miami Avenue 110 S. Miami Avenue 200 S. Miami Avenue 637 S. Miami Avenue 650 S. Miami Avenue 1000 S. Miami Avenue 1023 S. Miami Avenue 1150 S. Miami Avenue 1243 N. E. Miami Court 1350, 1354 N. E. Miami Court 1425 N. E. Miami Court 1433 N. E. Miami Court 1442 N. E. Miami Court 1445 N. E. Miami Court 1536 N. E. Miami Court IS45 N. E. Miami Court 1614 N. E. Miami Court 1618 N. E. Miami Court 1624 N. E. Miami Court 1632 N. E. Miami Court 1635 N. E. Miami Court 1420 N. E. Miami Place 1424 N. E. Miami Place 1432 N. E. Miami Place 1442 N. E. Miami Place 1443 N. E. Miami Place 1452 N. E. Miami Place 1505 N. E. Miami Place 9-5 1525 N. E. Miami Place 1530 N. E. Miami Place 1531 N. E. Miami Place 1537 N. E. Miami Place 1541 N. E. Miami Place 1550 N. E. Miami Place 1603 N. E. Miami Place 1610 N. E. Miami Place 1611 N. E. Miami Place 1632 N. E. Miami Place 40 S. W. North River Drive 100 N. E. I Avenue 117 N. E. 1 Avenue 140 N. E. I Avenue 300 N. E. 1 Avenue 420 N. E. 1 Avenue 500 N. E. 1 Avenue 501 N. E. I Avenue == 529 N. E. I Avenue =- 547 N. E. 1 Avenue 601-603 N. E. i Avenue 701 N. E. 1 Avenue 708 N. E. 1 Avenue i 814 N. E. 1 Avenue =- 824 N. E. i Avenue -- 906 N. E. I Avenue 937 N. E. I Avenue _- 938, 942 N. E. 1 Avenue 1207 N. E. 1 Avenue — 1221, 1227 N. E. 1 Avenue - 1422 N. E. 1 Avenue 1452 N. E. I Avenue 1502 N. E. 1 Avenue - 1512 N. E. I Avenue 1516 N. E. 1 Avenue — _ 1532 N. E. 1 Avenue 1542 N. E. 1 Avenue 1644 N. E. 1 Avenue 201-221 N. W. i Avenue 811 N. W. 1 Avenue _- 903 S. W. 1 Avenue 911 S. W. 1 Avenue 921 S. W. 1 Avenue J 925, 927, S. V. 1 Avenue 929, 931, 933, 9359 -_ 937, 939 1013-1015 S. W. I Avenue = 36 N. E. I Street W 58 N. E. I Street 76 112 N. E. I Street 11 120 N. E. 1 Street 139 N. E. 1 Street 101 S. E. I Street 121 S. E. I Street 131 S. E. 1 Street 168 S. E. I Street 225 S. E. 1 Street 229 S. W. 1 Street III N. E. 2 Avenue 138 N. E. 2 Avenue 213 N. E. 2 Avenue 229 N. E. 2 Avenue 700 N. E. 2 Avenue 722 N. E. 2 Avenue 724-744 N. E. 2 Avenue 901 N. E. 2 Avenue 1100 N. E. 2 Avenue 1222 N. E. 2 Avenue 13OD-1318 N. E. 2 Avenue 1410 N. E. 2 Avenue 25 S. E. 2 Avenue 34 S. E. 2 Avenue 10 S. W. 2 Avenue 33 S. W. 2 Avenue 36 N. E. 2 Street 118 N. E. 2 Street 130 N. E. 2 Street 227 N. E. 2 Street 7 N. W. 2 Street 45 S. E. 2 Street 200 S. W. 2 Street 10 N. E. 3 Avenue 12 N. E. 3 Street 234 N. E. 3 Street 243 N. E. 4 Street 259 N. E. 4 Street 60 S. E. 4 Street 22 N. E. 5 Street 28 N. E. 5 Street 46 N. E. 5 Street 121 N. E. 5 Street 127 N. E. 5 Street 135 N. E. 5 Street 151 N. E. 5 Street 49 N. W. 5 Street 10 S. E. 6 Street 14 S. E. 6 Street 18 S. E. 6 Street 28 S. E. 6 Street 38 S. E. 6 Street 9-15 S. E. 7 Street 9-6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1625 N. E. Miami Place 120 N. E. 1 Street 1530 N. E. Miami Place 139 N. E. 1 Street 1531 N. E. Miami Place 101 S. E. 1 Street 1537 N. E. Miami Place 121 S. E. l Street 1541 N. E. Miami Place 131 S. E. 1 Street 1550 N. E. Miami Place 168 S. E. 1 Street =_ 1603 N. E. Miami Place 225 S. E. 1 Street 1610 N. E. Miami Place 229 S. W. l Street 1611 N. E. Miami Place 111 N. E. 2 Avenue -= 1632 N. E. Miami Place 138 N. E. 2 Avenue .40 S. W. North River Drive 213 N. E. 2 Avenue 100 N. E. 1 Avenue 229 U. E. 2 Avenue 117 N. E. 1 Avenue 700 N. E. 2 Avenue 140 N. E. 1 Avenue 722 N. E. 2 Avenue 300 N. E. 1 Avenue 724-744 N. E. 2 Avenue t 420 N. E. 1 Avenue 901 N. E. 2 Avenue 600 N. E. 1 Avenue 1100 N. E. 2 Avenue 601 N. E. 1 Avenue 1222 N. E. 2 Avenue 529 N. E. 1 Avenue 1300-1318 N. E. 2 Avenue 647 N. E. 1 Avenue 1410 N. E. 2 Avenue —i 601-603 N. E. 1 Avenue 25 S. E. 2 Avenue 701 N. E. 1 Avenue 34 S. E. 2 Avenue -� 708 N. E. 1 Avenue 10 S. W. 2 Avenue 814 N. E. 1 Avenue 33 S. W. 2 Avenue 824 N. E. 1 Avenue 36 N. E. 2 Street _ 906 N. E. 1 Avenue 118 N. E. 2 Street 937 N. E. 1 Avenue 130 N. E. 2 Street �! 938, 942 N. E. 1 Avenue 227 N. E. 2 Street 1207 N. E. 1 Avenue 7 N. W. 2 Street 1221, 1227 N. E. 1 Avenue 45 S. E. 2 Street 1422 N. E. 1 Avenue 200 S. W. 2 Street - 1452 N. E. 1 Avenue 10 N. E. 3 Avenue 1502 N. E. 1 Avenue 12 N. E. 3 Street 1512 N. E. 1 Avenue 234 N. E. 3 Street 1516 N. E. 1 Avenue 243 N. E. 4 Street 1532 N. E. 1 Avenue 259 N. E. 4 Street 1642 N. E. 1 Avenue 60 S. E. 4 Street 1644 N. E. 1 Avenue 22 N. E. 5 Street 201-221 N. W. 1 Avenue 28 N. E. 5 Street 811 N. W. 1 Avenue 46 N. E. 5 Street 903 S. W. 1 Avenue 121 N. E. 5 Street 911 S. W. 1 Avenue 127 N. E. 5 Street 921 S. W. 1 Avenue 135 N. E. 5 Street 925, 927. S. W. 1 Avenue 151 N. E. 5 Street 929, 931, 933, 935, 49 N. W. 5 Street 937, 939 10 S. E. 6 Street 1013-1015 S. W. 1 Avenue 14 S. E. 6 Street —; 36 N. E. 1 Street 18 S. E. 6 Street _ 56-58 N. E. 1 Street 28 S. E. 6 Street 76 1/2 N. E. 1 Street 38 S. E. 6 Street -� 9-15 S. E. 7 Street _' { 44 S. W. 7 Street 54 S. W. 7 Street 50 N. W. 8 Street 73 N. W. 8 Street 80 N. W. 8 Street 93 So W. 8 Street 27 N. E. 9 Street 52 N. E. 9 Street 53 N. E. 9 Street 111 N. E. 9 Street .121 N. E. 9 Street 154 N. E. 9 Street 33 N. W. 9 Street 52 N. W. 9 Street 63 N. W. 9 Street 22 S. W. ) Street 29 S. W. 9 Street 124 N. E. 14 Street 253 N. E. 14 Street 21 S. W. 14 Terrace 151 S. E. 14 Terrace 464 N. E. 16 Street • 33, 42 N. E. 17 Street 64 N. E. 17 Street 35 S. W. 9 Street 70 S. W. 9 Street 50 N. E. 10 Street - 133 N. E. 10 Street 67 N. W. 10 Street 85 N. W. 10 Street 32 S. W. 10 Street 36 S. W. 10 Street 38 S. W. 10 Street 45-45 1/2 S. W. 10 Street 78. 81, 84, 85 S. W. 10 Street • 88, 89, 94 3 S. W. 11 Street (rear) 5 S. W. it Street 21 S. W. 11 Street 44 S. W. 11 Street 52 S. W. it Street 1 87 S. W. 11 Street 37 S. W. 12 Street 45 S. W. 12 Street 52 S. W. 12 Street 67 S. W. 12 Street 70 S. W. 12 Street 79 S. W. 12 Street g 186 S. E. 12 Terrace f 190 S. E. 12 Terrace 116 N. E. 13 Street : 125 N. E. 13 Street 128 N. E. 13 Street 166 N. E. 13 Street 19 S. W. 13 Street 45 S. W. 13 Street 84 SA2 W., 13• Strget:: • 3c S 115-117 N. E. 14 Strut 1 EXMUIT 94 ABClEOl06ICAL 1. Biscayne Archeological Zone • 2. Dupon•__Archee1ogic81 Zone---_-,.�� 3. World Trade Center Archeological Zone 4. Granada -Archeological Zone 5. Fort -Dallas Archeological Zone 6. North Bank Archeological Zone ` 7. Brickell Archeological Zone S. Brickell Park Archeological Zone- �- 9. Presbyterian Church Archeological Zone 10. South Bank Archeological Zone - 11. Nest Bank Archeological Zone r z . • : s-rEa PLAW. METROPOLITAN DADE OOUNTY fjf R4��I Pl"t1NinC 1�6 SEP 18 Pik 3: � 2 EXHIBIT 9-S OFFICE OF COUNTY MANAGER COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION WARNER PLACE 111 S.W. 54h AVENUE, SUITE 101 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33130 (3W 5454= hV=t 29, 1986 Mr. Sergio Rodriguez Director, Planning Department City of Iitd 275 N.W. 2nd Street Miami, FL. 33128 Dear Mr. Rodriguez: I have reviewed the list of sites potentially eligible for National Regiat�ar listing being prepared in eonjunctinn with the Downtown Miami Deve of Regional Impact study. In my opinion, the list appears to include al the eligible sites within the delineated boundaries. Likewise, the list of po*---ial archeological zones within the area boundaries appears accurate and complete. Should you require additional information, please call our office. Sincerely, OOWTCMM MIANI HISTORIC SITE NUTAGEIEV PLAN BACKGROUND EXHIBIT 94 The City of Miami has had a heritage conservation program since October 1981, when an Interim Heritage Conservation Zoning District Ordinance was adopted to protect existing National Register properties. This ordinance was strengthened in May 1982 with the passage of a permanent Heritage Conservation Ordinance. The ordinance provides a mechanism to designate historic sites, historic districts, and archeological zones and to review proposed alterations, demolitions, and new construction. As a part of its heritage conservation program, the Planning Department also prepares National Register nominations for selected properties and works with other City departments and agencies, neighborhood organizations, and the general public in promoting preservation. The City of Miami has been recognized as a Certified Local Government by the Florida Division of Archives History and Records Management (DAHRM) and the National Park Service. NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES: • With the assistance of a grant from the DAHRM under the Certified Local Government program, the City of Miami Planning Department is in the process of nominating all eligible properties within the Downtown Master Plan area to the National Register. This Multiple Resource Nomination is only the second of its kind to be prepared in Florida and includes all properties listed in Exhibit 9-1. The nomination was submitted to the DAHRM on September 30, 1986, for consideration by the National Register Review Board in February 1987. HERITAGE CONSERVATION ORDINANCE: The City of Miami's Heritage Conservation Ordinance is currently the most effective means of encouraging the preservation of historic sites and districts within the City. Designation of properties takes the form of a Heritage Conservation (HC) Zoning Overlay District. Properties designated — under this ordinance cannot be alerted, added to, or demolished without the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness by the Heritage Conservation Board or Planning Department. Review is triggered by the building permit i process and insures that all future changes to a property are in keeping with i its historic character. The Heritage Conservation Board, however, does not have the authority to deny the demolition of a historic site, but can delay the dewlition for up to six (6) months. While regulating future changes to =j historic sites, the ordinance also provides certain zoning incentives for selected properties. Incentives can include change of use, FAR or density ;' t bonuses, and modification of height, setback, and parking regulations. To date, eleven (11) of the properties in Exhibit 9-1 have been designated HC by the City Commission. To encourage the preservation of al properties on at this list, the Planning Department will recomond to the City commission the HC designation of the remaining properties included in Exhibit 9-1. The Planning Department will also explore the appropriateness of offering specific zoning incentives for individual properties. • w�i1A�`sr tM�4. ?vjts�l0 �!1�1tA�►t�s�{r1!1 !irline n;�tMiC+ �}rdin?nc� W.== mA!+�ted t• Ej DOMNTOW MIAMI ARCHEOLOGICAL NANAGEIENT PLAN BACKGROUND: EXHIBIT 94 The management guidelines included in this proposed Downtown Miami Archaeological Management Plan have, in fact, already have been in use in planning reviews made of specific downtown projects since 1980 by the Metro - Dade Historic Preservation Division and the State of Florida's Division of Archives, History and Records Management. This management plan is based on data compiled during the Dade County Historic Survey in 1978-1980. Additional data that resulted from the County Archeologist's field monitoring of construction projects in downtown Miami since 1980 have also supplemented this management plan. DEFINITIONS: An archeological zone is a property area that does or is likely to include archeological sites, features, or artifacts that are of local, state, or national historic significance. BOUNDARY JUSTIFICATIONS: The primary intent of the archeological zone(s) is to fully encompass significant sites, features, and artifacts. Often, specific boundaries for these resources are unknown because they are buried under concrete or fill, or hidden beneath existing structures. The archeological zones attempt to reasonably encompass these unknown site boundaries. Secondly, archeological zone boundaries were determined to provide efficient management. Thus boundaries of specific zones utilize existing property lines, streets, and geographic features to facilitate this management. INTENT: The Downtown Miami Archeological Management Plan is designed to provide a vehicle for protecting historic resources from uncontrolled destruction and developers from unwanted delays and obstructions. The availability of a plan with specific guidelines allows the developer to consider those historic resources prior to their possible discovery during construction work when it could cause delays. The plan provides for the recording and recovery of significant archeological artifacts, features, and human interments prior to their destruction. It also recommends continued preservation of two archeologically significant green spaces: the Granada - Convention Center green space and Brickell Park. _ IMPLEMENTATION: —=i To i ilewnt the recoa-iendations of this management plan, the City of Miami Planning Department will request the assistance of the County Archeologist in preparing designation reports for the archeological zees specified herein. -'- Upon completion, the Planning Department will recormend to the City Commission the designation of each zone as an archeological zone under the City of Miami 9-14 (A- Heritage Conservation Ordinance. Once designated as an archeological zone; no permits will be issued for construction; filling; digging' tree removal', or any other activity that may alter or reveal an archeological site, without first having a Certificate of Appropriateness issued in compliance with this management plan. ARCHEOLOGICAL ZONE #I: BISCAYNE ARCHEOLOGICAL ZONE Boundaries: Generally bounded by N. E. 5 Street on the south, N.E. 2 Avenue on the west, N.E. 10 Street on the north, and Biscayne Boulevard on the east. Site Probability: Moderate Possibility of prehistoric or early historic sites near what once was the historic shoreline of Biscayne Bay. An elevated ridge within the zone (suggestive of a prehistoric midden) and scattered shell refuse has been observed there during archeological monitoring of lot clearing during recent years. Management: Archeological monitoring during clearing, excavation, and construction work. Possible sub -surface testing in areas of shell refuse and ridge prior to development. ARCHEOLOGICAL ZONE #2: DUPONT ARCHEOLOGICAL ZONE Boundaries: Generally bounded by the Miami River of the south, S.E. 2 Avenue on the west, S.E. 2 Street on the north, and Biscayne Boulevard on the east. Site Probability: High Archival documents and observations by a number of archeologists strongly suggest that the site of the Spanish Mission, San Maria de Lorento (DalO65), was situated within this zone. This zone also contains components of the prehistoric village Tequesta (Dall) dating back to ca. 500 B.C., and was the site of two constructed mounds (Da14, Da16) prior to their destruction. This site might contain foundations of the Spanish Mission and fort, and possibly a cemetery. Some components of the ca. 1840 Fort Dallas are also situated within this zone. Management: Part of the zone is covered by two asphalt topped parking lots. These two parking lots should be stripped of asphalt and fill to permit systematic subsurface testing prior to any development. Mitigation in this zone might hete"s` Ute extensive archeological excavations. k .. , 9-15 N ARCHEOLOGICAL ZONE #3: WORLD TRADE CENTER ARCHEOLOGICAL ZONE Boundaries: Generally bounded as follows: Commencing at the intersection of S. E. 3 Street and S. E. I Avenue, thence northerly along S. E. I Avenue to S. E. I Street, thence easterly along S. E. I Street to S. E. 3 Avenue, thence southerly along S. E. 3 Avenue to S. E. 2 Street, thence westerly along S. E. 2 Street to S. E. 2 Avenue, thence southerly along S. E. 2 Avenue to S. E. 3 Street, thence westerly along S. E. 3 Street to the Point of Beginning. Site Probability: Moderate Possibility of prehistoric and early historic materials being located within the zone, based on observations of archeological monitoring within the zone in the last seven years that have included the recovery of a sixteenth century olive jar and various prehistoric artifacts. Management: Archeological monitoring during any clearing, excavation, and construction work. ARCHEOLOGICAL ZONE #4: GRANADA ARCHEOLOGICAL ZONE Boundaries: A triangular parcel of land generally bounded by the Miami River on the south, the City of Miami Convention Center on the northwest, and S. E. 2 Avenue on the east. The Convention Center's pool and patio extend over this zone. This is a wedge shaped archeological preservation area that was dedicated by the City of Miami and the State of Florida's Division of Archives, History and Records Management to preserve a component of the Granada Archeological Site (Gall) which had been partially excavated prior to the construction of the Convention Center. Site Probability: Definite Known components of prehistoric and early historic sites (Dail) and features occur within this zone. Management: Preservation should be maintained if possible. Any future disturbances within the zone should be done after sub -surface testing and excavations. ARCHEOLOGICAL ZONE #5: FORT DALLAS ARCHEOLOGICAL ZONE $oundaries..-Generally -bounded by the- Miami River on the south, S. Mimi Avenue on the west, S.E. 1 Street on the north, and S.E. 1 Avenue and the easterly boundary of Fort Dallas Park on the east. Site Probability: Moderate to High �I Possibility of both prehistoric and early historic sites within this zone as determined by archeological monitoring that had been done for the People Mover is construction indicating that major components of the ca. 1850 Fort Dallas occupation are located within this zone (DaJ0611,, Da2133). Management: Archeological monitoring plus possible subsurface testing and excavation should be conducted prior and during any proposed development within this zone. ARCHEOLOGICAL ZONE #6: NORTH BANK ARCHEOLOGICAL ZONE Boundaries: Generally bounded as follows: Corrnencing at the intersection of W. Flagler Street and the easterly shoreline of the Miami River, thence easterly along W. Flagler Street to I-95, thence southerly along I-95 to S. W. 1 Street, thence easterly along S. W. 1 Street to S. W. 2 Avenue, thence southerly along S. W. 2 Avenue to S. W. 3 Street, thence easterly along S. W. 3 Street to S. Miami Avenue, thence southerly along S. Miami Avenue to the northerly shoreline of the Miami River, thence westerly and northwesterly along the Miami River to the Point of Beginning. Site Probability: Moderate to High Possibility of prehistoric and early historic sites being situated within this zone closed to the river. 0 Management: Archeological monitoring during any clearing, excavations, and construction work within this zone. ARCHEOLOGICAL ZONE 7: BRICKELL ARCHEOLOGICAL ZONE Boundaries: Generally bounded by Brickell Park on the south, the easterly right-of-way of Brickell Avenue on the west, the Miami River on the north, and Biscayne Bay on the east. Site Probability: High At least three sites: (Da12) a prehistoric madden, (Da13) the site of a prehistoric burial mound, and the Brickell Trading Post are all situated within this zone. Management: Additional archeological testing and excavations will be needed- to. be. conducted- within zone, particularly in the vicinity of the Brickell Apartments. A small "archeological preservation area" exists within the traffic island in front of the Brickell Holiday Inn, and a portion of the Brickell House foundation is located within that traffic island. Also, along the ridge near the hotel there are archeological features still preserved, and if any further development or construction occurs there, monitoring or possibly additional testing in those areas will be required. r 9-17 `, 46, ARCHEOLOGICAL ZONE #E8: BRICKELL PARK ARCHEOLOGICAL ZONE i Boundaries: Generally bounded by the First Presbyterian Church property on �i the south, the easterly right-of-way line of Brickell Avenue on the west, the Holiday Inn property on the north, and Biscayne Bay on the east. Site Probability: High Known occurrence of graves and prehistoric site components (Da12) exist within the park. Also included is the structure of the Brickell Mausoleum erected by the Brickell family. Management: Continued prese, cation of this area as green space is recommended. Any major sub -surface work for pipe or irrigation excavations should be monitored by an archeologist. Additional management measures should be the exclusion of the public from utilizing metal detectors and digging in this park. (The removal and digging of artifacts from this park has been an ongoing problem during the last several years.) ARCHEOLOGICAL ZONE #9: PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ARCHEOLOGICAL ZONE Boundaries: Generally bounded by the Lincoln Property Company project property on the south, the easterly right-of-way line of Brickell Avenue on the west, Brickell Park on the north, and Biscayne Bay on the east. 0' Site Probability: Moderate to High Known location of a prehistoric sand burial mound (DaM. Probably destroyed during the construction of the church. However, possibility of the occurrence of sub -surface components of the burial mound, prehistoric habitation, or very early pioneer homesteads is still great. Management: Archeological monitoring during any clearing, excavation, or construction work should be conducted for any development within this zone. ARCHEOLOGICAL ZONE #10: SOUTH BANK ARCHEOLOGICAL ZONE Boundaries: Generally bounded by S.E. 6 Street on the south, S. Miami Avenue on the west, the Miami River on the north, and Brickell Avenue on the east. $.#e_Pr°obabil itys ; Moderate to -High A possibility of prehistoric and early historic sites being this zone is documented by the several instances of historic artifacts and features recorded during monitoring within the last seven years. Sites WIN, DaIO64, Da1037 have also been this zone. The site of Fletcher's coontie mill is believed within this zone. 9-18 c? situated within and prehistoric zone during the recorded within to be situated MEN Management: Sub -surface testing should be conducted within components of this zone prior to an devel roan Additi l h 1 i i it i i h b i y op . ono arc eo og ca mom or ng m g t e requ red for other portions of the zone during any clearing, excavations, or construction work here. ARCHEOLOGICAL ZONE #11: WEST BANK ARCHEOLOGICAL ZONE Boundaries: Generally hounded by the westerly exit ramp for the S. Miami Avenue Bridge and S. W. 7 Street on the south, Metrorail on the west, the Miami River on the north, and S. Miami Avenue on the east. Site Probability: Moderate Possibility of prehistoric sites or camps being located near the bank of the Miami River. Similar areas, particularly the Jose Marti Park, have yielded Indian campsites and burials dating back approximately 1,000 years. Management: Archeological monitoring during any clearing, excavations, and construction work within the zone should be conducted. Wiliil'' i'U i A101,1AVIY Table 10.1. CONSTRUCTION COSTS (CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT) Total % In Cost It" Phase I Phase II Phase III Total Reg�on - Dollars Land $141,5709000 $119,790,000 $ 980010,000 $ 359,370,000 100% $ 359,3709000 Labor 19198190572 849515,152 133,990,404 410,325,128 100% 410,3259128 Material 447,579,002 1979202,020 312,644,276 957,425,298 70% 670,197,709 Interest 57,545,872 25,3549545 40,197,121 123,097,538 70% 86,168,277 Preliminary Planning 22,378.950 9_t860,101 15,632,214 47,871,265 50% 23,935,633 Total $86098939396 $4369721,818 $600,474,015 $19898,0899229 82% 51,54999969746 Source: Hauer, Siler, George Associates. t {f- VIuilNi�ll��d�j'ILI��I�,U111JIIIIIL�ViIJIN�I:'IVIWV�i���Vii�hlll�'i�itl�ll�Iflltl�VlllldYd�h��l��li � � I � � � _y 4 Y Table 10.1.' CONSTRUCTION COSTS (BRICKELL SUBAREA) Total % In Cos,_ I Phase I Phase 11 Phase ,III ' Total R— 2 `Ton Ool I ars land t 392,040,000 $2099088,000 $19690209000 791-,148;000- 100% $ -7979148,000 Labor 17597729997 89,0879693 839712,415 3489573,105 100% '348,573,105 Material 410,136,993 207,871,285 195,283,967 813,137,245 70% '569,336,072 Interest 52,731,899 26,726,308 25,113,724 104,571,931 70% 73,2009352 Preliminary Planning 20, 506, 850 10,393j564 9,766,448 40� 666, 862 50% 20,333,431 Total $1s05Ig188o739 $543,166,850 $509p9419554 $2,104,297,143 86% $1;80895909959 Source: Hammer, Siler, George Associates. 1 Table 10.1. CONSTRUCTION COSTS (OMNI.SUBAAREA) " Total % In cost �Phase I Phase II Phase III Total Ie2ion Dollars Land $ 44,431,200 S 18,295,200 $ 39,204,000 $101,930,400 100 $101,930,400 Labor 64,550,207 994,547 64,257,397 176,862,151 100% 176,802,151 Material 150,617,149 111,9871275 149,933,927 412,538,351 70% 288,776,646 Interest 19,365,062 14,398,364 19,277,219 53,040,645 701% 37,128,452 Preliminary Planning 7,530,857 5,599,364 79496,696 20,626,917 50% 10,313,459 Total $286,494,475 $198,274,750 $280,169,239 $764,938,464 80% $614,951,307 Source: Hammer, Siler, George Associates. tl'1 I ulal��ll�i�I�,II �III�i��lu�J�l� itil� � e�I V�i�II�I���II�Iill�ll�I �I _ I III IIfIVII:�I ll�l�f��l�ili{�w��i��li�idill I ! 6i; ,,y 11 41 iiir � r. Table 10.2. CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYMENT (CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT) ur;mO' 000 SLOOO- 14 9% - +- $1�000- 24 9z9 25 000- 49,z99 l o ant Emp Reg m Reg '' Emp Reg Emp Reg Phase 1 0 100% 272 100% 4,983 100% 3,806 100% Phase 11 0 ! 100% 120- 100% 2,204 100% 11669 100% Phase 111 0 100% 190 100% 39494 100% 2,646 100% Tatal 100% 100% 100% 100% Source: Hamer, Siler., 6eorge.Associates. 0 50 000 SOver Emp Rn Total 0 100% 99061 0 100% 3,992 0 1001% 6,329 --6 100% 19,382 , Table 10.2. CONS?RUCTIW EMPLOYMENT (BRICKELL SUBAREA). Under 8 000$81,000- 1C9�99 $1�5L000_524,9�9 $25 000-549 �99 10of Emp R.g im � R�� RN Phase 1 0.• 100% 249 100% 4,566 100% 3,487, 100% Phase 11 0 100% 126 100% 29323 100% 1,759 100% Phase 1I1 011 100% 1I3 100% 20183 100% 1,653 100% Total 100% 100% K, M 100% 6,899: 100% Source: Hammer, Siler, George Associates. $50 000 S Over 1 9- Eep Reg Total 0 100% 8,303 0 100% 4,208 0 100% 3,954 --6 100% TFb, ill li li� l jI'� II I � II i I ICI �y III' !III ilea I JII a �J pjgi l I' II III i I l �llll l l�flllo l 1��� l��a�l��ill�� O l lii l ll, d III IIaU� I� ll IIII 9 I 3=.4 a III F SiM� Table 10.2. CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYMENT (OMNI SUBAREA) t�lo�d-e-r- 8 000-$14,�449 $15 00024,9999 S25 000- 49,999 50 000 t� Over 10 nt �I E� -6�-0000- % � # x � �— � � ESP R� Ecr �e _2 E � R � Total Phase 1 0 100% 91 100% 19676 100% :100% 100% 11281 948 100% 100% 0 0 100% 100% 3,049 21267 Phase 11 Phase:111 0 0 100% 1007, 68 91 1,251 :100% 1,615 1009E 1,269 100% 0 100% 3,035 Total 0 100x 250 100% 49602 100% 39498 100% 0 100% 89352 Source: Hamer, Siler, George Associates. B) COMPLETE TABLE 10.3 FOR EACH PHASE, ESTIMATING THE TOTAL NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES BY THREE -DIGIT SIC CODE AND BY LAND USE SECTOR (COL. 1, # EMP.) AND THE PERCENTAGE OF EMPLOYEES THAT WILL COME FROM WITHIN THE REGION (COL. 2, & REGION). FOR MIXED -USE PROJECTS WITH A RESIDENTIAL COMPONENT, ESTIMATE THE NUMBER OF RESIDENTS EXPECTED TO BE EMPLOYED WITH THE PROJECT (COL. 3, RES. EMP.). �J: I I!'I 1'1 I'i Table 10.3.1. PE1:I W RETAIL O L la (CB'iOL BUSINESS DISTRICT) . 51W $8,000 000- 14 999 $15,000-524,999 $25,100-$49,999 $50,000 or Mom T�1 6�10 Rose I fa pf FoWs 5" 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 3 Dtq Sty 591 1 1 11 10 8 7 0 0 0 0 20 &QMWW 541 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Liq w/Wine 592 0 0 3 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 4 Caifts 594 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 Beaty Salon 723 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 Clearw! a Pgair 721 0 0 3 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 5 5 Omer" Qmp 724 0 0 _ 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 Deptralt Stores 531 45 40 610 549 460 414 23 21 12 11 1,150 1,035 Costum Jewelry 594 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 Jewelry 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fast Foods SM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 kstamint W qwr %1 3 3 37 33 28 25 1 1 1 1 70 63 Ladies' Speciality 553 1 1 8 7 6 6 0 0 0 0 15 14 Sees, Ladies' 566 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 Sporting maxis 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOY Store Sm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Owwative Accessaries 571 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Fabric Stop 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Plant Store 599 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 optical 599 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gains and Drapes 571 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Autwtive Sm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hft Shop 5% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Arts 6 Crafts 5% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Health Spa 729 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 We Theater m 0 0 3 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 5 5 BA 602 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MEM ' War 561 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 3 ' Stems & athletic C�weir 566 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Camera SIM Sm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Table 10.3.1. PEA4 M WWL 8rP1.OMfM CENtitAl EbI1+ESS DISiRt y � , lkdr i8,000 $8�000-514 15 000-524 525,004-549,�999 $50�000 or More Total z999 fl Gt aw � Rea 1 toad.) eat 011�0 9" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rath Sip 571 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ALdigNisual 573 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Aawrds & Tapes 573 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 sbtoul W 9 W M 33 49 24 U l3 12 1W TOM Raw 11 • Storer 531 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Speciality Foods 549 0 0 4 4 3 3 1 0 0 0 8 7 COSUM Foods 563 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 Jo elry 594 0 0 6 S 6 6 0 0 0 0 12 11 Fast Fonds 581 2 2 21 19 16 14 1 1 0 0 40 36 Res W/LigLw 581 1 1 12 11 7 6 0 0 0 0 20 18 Ladies` Speciality 563 5 5 64 58 48 42 2 2 1 1 120 108 Shoes, Ladies' 566 3 3 38 34 29 26 1 1 1 1 72 65 Spying comb 594 0 0 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 0 5 5 Tay Stoe 5A4 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 3 rBmntive des 593 0 0 6 5 6 6 0 0 0 0 12 11 FaWc ft 594 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 3 Plant Sure 526 0 0 3 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 5 5 Optical 599 0 0 3 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 5 5 DzUins and Drapes 571 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 3 Autmotive 559 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stop 594 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 3 e k is & Crafts 594 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 3 Health Spa 729 0 0 4 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 6 5 ie Theater 783 0 0 4 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 5 5 Bank 602 1 1 7 6 9 8 1 1 0 0 18 16 14etst bier 561 3 3 37 33 28 25 1 1 1 1 70 63 Mend° Shoes & Athletic tr w 566 1 1 16 14 12 11 1 1 0 0 30 27 o I.s!1 hill! 1III 1111 Illll�iillldillllll!IlYtliu W..W, D , a ard Dr4m Auto,. fttv Shop Arts & Cmfts Health Y MMe Theater a „4 i ! w & Athletic ^ti hop io m Nth A -Y Adi,, Nisull %.f .. & T4M y+•` i se III vatm Sp..Fooft CotUw Jae] ry Fat Jaelry Restarmt ,f Table 10.3 j. PEAMM 1 EAIIL OfLO W (OtlCKELL1 true � thdd' $6.000 / S8.00A-Y14.999 � $15000- 4 999 000- 9 999i�0 or MDrr Tvta1 6�plq —�— SIC Code — j!3 — — — p — R% —fT— 571. 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 559 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 594 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 729 0 0 .6 5 4 4 0 0 0 0 10 9 783 0 0 4- 3 3 3 0 0 & 0 7 6 602 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6' 0 0 0 551 0 0 7 6 5 5 0 0 6) 0 12 11 5% 0 0 4 3 2 2 0 0 6) 0 6 5 594 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 2 594 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 d 0 0 0 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d 0 0 0 573 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (� 0 0 0 573 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 531 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (P 0 0 0 549 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 563 1 1 16 14 12 11 1 I 0 30 27 594 0 0 .3 3 2 2 0 0 1 0 5 5 581 1 0 5 5 4 4 0 0 0 10 9 581 0 0 5 4 4 4' 0 0 0 9 8 n 1 n II'lii�'u{i'IIIIi�CI'I�IwV I!.ILIVII��Yll'�I{r�Ild9�s�IV�I��'�IiiV�°i�l�tllidil�lll�llllll�lilllll k r y, ti OWN Table 10.3.1. PB MIfW RETAIL BROMN W (CE1iTW BMItE.'SS DISTRICT) (Cmtim ed) t % 58 ,_,% $l _ 499 0000- 49 999 SW000 or More Total 6ip1 Retail Catenory Sm Cade f Re Enp 6�p PEI 6&i Ft Dv Phase 11 cmt. Caw—, sm Books & Statim" 994 594 0 0 0 0 3 6 3 5 3 6 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 12 5 Il Bet shop 594 • 0 0 3 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 6 5 AudigNIxml 573 1 1 8 7 7 6 0 0 0 0 16 14 Tapes 573 0 0 5 5 5 4 0 0 0 0 10 9 Subtoul 17 V 'm 2ff I81 a 7 1 1 a� M Phase III Jr. Dpartmnt Stone 531 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Speciality Fools 549 0 0 5 5 5 4 0 0 0 0 • 10 9 Costae Jaelty 563 1 1 12 11 9 8 0 0 0 0 22 20 Ja elry 594 1 1 10 9 7 6 0 0 0 0 i8 16 Fast Fbods 581 2 2 21 19 16 14 1 1 0 0 40 36 Pestairmt. wAiww 581 3 3 39 35 26 25 1 1 1 1 72 66 Ladies' Speciality 563 4 4 53 48 40 35 2 2 1 1 100 90 Stvoest Ladies' 566 2 2 21 19 16 14 1 1 0 0 40 36 Spotting Goods 594 0 0 4 4 3 2 0 0 0 0 7 6 Tcy Store 594 1 1 7 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 13 12 Eie�oratf koessaries 593 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 3 Fabric 9%. 594 0 0 3 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 5 5 Plant S"av S26 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 4 optical 599 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 3 Curtains and Drapes 571 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 4 Automotive 559 0 0 4 4 4 3 0 0 0 0 8 7 ftby shop 594 0 0 6 5 6 6 0 0 0 0 12 11 Arts & Cmfts 594 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 3 Health Spa 729 0 0 6 5 3 3 0 0 0 0 9 8 tie 'hater 783 0 0 4 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 5 5 Mats' sear 602 1 1 10 9 12 11 1 1 0 0 24 22 Mans' Sues & Athletic 561 2 2 25 23 18 17 l 1 0 0 48 43 war 566 1 1 8 7 7 6 0 0 0 0 16 14 cy }L !ti r ♦ t Table 10.30. FMWMIt RETAIL WOMM CBVw RUSm Dimft •_ `, Un&r $8,� �� 000- 14 994 15 000-524 999 �d34- 9 999�a0 `�0 cr i�r� Total i FV10 "i� � TV � � Phi III amt. Books 3 Stabs 5514 594 0 0 0 0 4 2 4 3 Z 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 G 0 0 7 4 6 4 Bath 5% 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 4 ALd1qN1sm1 573 0 0 3 3 2 2 0 0 .0 0 5 5 Re= & Tapes 573 1 1 6 6 6 0 0 0 0 14 13 Grad Total " $� U TIM i;ioi w m x 9 u Souris: Siler, George Associates. + Ir 3 1r ? II1'1111hhl JI I Table 10.3.i2. PE #WW OFFICE 9Q DVM f (CINW QlSIIESS DISIRICT) tkider' 000 $8 000- 14 999 $15 000-$24,999 $25 000-549 999 $50 ti00 or Fbm Total lmrrt . T slc (bde m R E�p RN Ek _@I Mismllmm Savices 739 36 22 58 52 267 240 289 271 72 65 722 650 Medical Services 801 72 65 116 104 534 481 578 520 144 130 1,444 1,300 dal SeMces 811 217 195 347 312 1,603 1,443 1,733 1,5W 433 390 4,333 3,900 iul Estate Services 661 ' 72 65 116 104 534 481 578 520 144 130 1,444 1,300 I 641 36 22 58 52 267 240 289 271 72 65 722 650 Fiance 602,12 217 195 347 312 1,603 1,443 1,733 1,560 433 390 4,333 3,900 Imesbnts 621 72 72 65 0 116 104 534 481 578 520 '6,222 144 130 1,444 1300 3,000 ScItilt+Otal ,j T 4W f,-92- 4,809 51M 10442 �300 14,442 P II Miarreoris Seevioes 739 18 16 29 26 136 122 147 133 37 33 ' 367 330 Medical Services 801 37 33 59 53 271 244 • 293 254 73 66 733 660 Legal Services 811 37 33 59 53 271 244 293 264 73 66 733 660 W Estate Services 661 110 99 176 158 814 733 880 792 220 198 2,200 1,980 Inmrm 605 37 33 59 53 271 244 293 264 73 66 733 660 Finm 602,12 18 16 29 26 136 122 147 133 37 33 367 330 ImPesbants 621 110 99 176 158 814 733 880 'f, 792 220 M 198 2 2G0 Tm 1 980 Srbtotal 7 8 �12 Ml 2,442 933 T, W 6(i Phase III ias Smviaes 739 17 15 27 24 123 111 133 120 33 30 333 300 Vadical Services 8J1 33 30 53 48 247 222 267 240 67 60 667 600 Legal Services 811 33 30 53 48 247 222 267 240 67 60 667 600 W Estate Services 661 100 90 160 144 740 666 800 720 200 180 2,000 1,800 I 605 33 30 53 48 247 222 267 240 67 60 567 600 Fiance 602912 17 15 27 24 123 111 133 120 33 30 333 300 I estimnts 621 100 90 160 144 740 666 800 720 200 180 2000 �;6G7 1 800 00 Srbltotal 0�0 033 4ffi F, 7 2,220 ,667 TW 6-67 600 (bard Total �, Y'W M9 Tf-,M 10,224 2,842 TW W,W 3,W Table 10.3.3. PEROW BR04l N (INISIRIAl. CW W♦ CMUM DISiRICI) lkder' 000 SSlOOD- 14 999 $1�S24,999 0,M$49,9W $50 000_.or Total EVVIOW nt SIC Cob p BE I Erg) fil GP -01�1 fig FIRM mil rodxts 264 0 0 2 2 5 4 2 2 1 1 10 9 Camor ial Printing 275 0 0 2 2 5 4 3 2 1 2 1 1 0 1 0 10 5 9 5 Metalworking Bach. & 354/ 0 0 1 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 3 3 i ale Try 383 508 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 3 2 11 10 1 1 0 0 15 14 Rblic moThwing 422 0 0 1 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 5 5 Snical Medical5 Dental Instnowts 34 2 9 11 SdAotal 6 $ ri IT '9'S 4 9 1 RAW Printing m 0 a 0 a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w alesale Try itxalesale Trade Sm 511 0 a 0 a a 0 a o 0 0 a a Walesale Trade 501,6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 matalworkim . & 354 0 0 a 0 ` 0 0 0 -o 0 a 0 b 0 b 0 b 1 b b b b b b 5 b Phase III r -ts 2% 0 0 1 1 3 3 1 1 0 0 5 5 C^cial minting Metalws Ling W. & 275 354/ 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 1 5 3 4 3 2 1 2 1 1 0 1 0 10 5 9 5 It essle Trade i. 383 Sm 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 3 2 9 2 8 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 1 3 15 3 14 Public fttaxing 422 0 0 2 2 5 4 2 2 1 1 10 9 9sVicai Medical & dental 384 1 1 8 7 30 27 7 6 2 2 48 43 Insummints I 19 V -9R H 1 �6 Grand Total Z I 9 9 9 95 H ZO lu TZ Sourne: How, Siler, George Associates. N*� In . Table 10.3:2: PE1WW(T E?DPIMW (I14Xf5iRUL CEWK BUSilESS DISTRICT) W r WOOD $8,000-S14,999 I5 000-$24,999 $25,000-$49 999 $50 WO or Mors Total 1 wt _ SIC Code • 6FP 9FP Ri Err BP f§j E p� Ph�a I ier•`rl�' 264 0 0 21 2 5 4 2 2 1 1' 10 9 Cmantul Prirrtirg', 275 0 0 2 2 5 4' 2 2 1 i 10 9 Fkalwmting fib. & 354/ 0 0 1` 1 3 3 1 1 0 0 5 5 Equip. 1 le Trade 1 383 503 0 , 0 0 0 1• 3 1 3 2 11 2 10 0' 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 15 3 14 Piblis Warthaming , 422 0 0 1' 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 5 5' surgical wical & mortal Irmtritnts 384 0 0 f 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 3 3 Subtotal b b � � � � i; '9 2 2 51 a Nme -"Tal Printir 275 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Resale Trzk j/ 508 ilesale Try ' 511 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Valesale Trau#e 501,6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Malm,kirg Mxh. & 354 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal 0 0 b a b o 3 MAW III �ec'd 264 0 0 1' 1 3 3 1 1 0 0 5 5 Cxial P9^iratie+= 275 0 0 2 2 5 4 2 2 1. 1 10 9 MalwAirg Mom. & 354/ 0 0 f 1 3 3 1 1 0 0 5 5 Equip. 383 0 0 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 3 3 Welessle Try 508 0 0 3 3 9 8 2 2 l 1 15 14 Pal is Wrdwing Q 0 0 2 2 5 4 2 2 1 1 10 9 SuMical Wical & Oeartal Drbumts 384 1 1 8 7 30 27 7 6 2 2 48 43 Subtotal T T TO TY 5 51 TS T4 9� O wd Toil T T 2N 9 80 1 �0 3 i w TZ Source: How, Siier, George Associates. . Table 10.3.1. PEMW RETAIL 04IAiIlNM WWI) Uder• $8,00D $8,000-$14,999 l� 5999 $25,000449,999 $50,WO or ftv Total EmIgmt x boil CatM7 SIC Code 6� P Epp RR Eap F�q 6& @1 UP 1§1 Cm R�qe Phase I is ty Foods 549 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 3 Om Store 591 1 1 16 14 12 11 1 1 0 0 30 27 Rpwmrket 541 3 2 42 38 32 29 2 2 1 1 80 72 Limar/Wire 592 1 1 10 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 12 11 Cm*Ai fts 594 1 0 7 7 4 4 0 0 0 0 12 11 Beauty Salon 723 0 0 4 .13 3 3 0 0 0 0 7 16 Cleaner Stme Repair 721 1 1 1 7 8 6 5 0 0 0 15 14 Bator SVP 724 1 Sc tal '1 9 � �i �4 5� � � 1 m M Phase 11 N.—OFwbmt Stone 531 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Specialty Foads 549 1 0. 4 4 3 3 0 0 0 0 8 7 Costure Jewelry 563 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 3 Jewelry 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fast Foods 581 1 1 16 14 12 11 1 1 0 0 30 27 Restmaant Wqw 581 4 4 53 47 40 36 2 2 1 1 100 90 Ladies' Speciality 563 1 1 11 10 8 7 0 0 . 0 0 20 18 Shoes, Ladies' 566 0 0 4 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 7 6 Sportirg Goods 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Toy Stone 5% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0eoorative Aoomwies 593 1 1 16 14 12 11 1 1 0 0 30 27 Fabric Stop 594 0 0 4 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 6 5 pleat Stage 526 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WC11 599 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II! Il�vi�illll'�I��Ii" li�Ii�lllli III III I � I I I I �� I I ill II I 'I II�� �I� � L Table 10.3.2. Mi NDff OFFICE E)YPIA11lW (MIClQM 90M) Under $8,000 $8,000-$14 z999 15 000-$24,999 $25,000449 $50 000 or More T%tw %Tmae %z999 SIC Code Eii� RR Erb R.e. E Fqj Fpp @1 Gp 1� R Phase I Nisml1'an m Services 739 33 30 53 48 247 222 267 240 67 60 667 600 Medical Services 801 67 60 107 96 493 444 533 480 133 120 1,333 1,200 Ell Services 811 200 180 320 288 1,480 1,332 1,600 1,440 4C0 360 4,C40 3,600 Real Estate Services 661 '67 60 107 % 493 444 533 480 133 120 1,333 1,200 Irmrmce 641 33 30 53 48 247 222 267 240 67 60 667 600 Finance 602,12 200 180 320 288 1,480 1,332 1,600 1,440 400 360 4,000 3,600 Ira+estmerrts 621 67 60 107 % 493 444 533 480 133 120 1333 1200 3'f,t�03 Subtotal Orb ,�0 0 , 933 4,440 5, 0 T8 00 1,333 1,200 3M33 Phase 11 i soe arms Services 739 17 15 27 24 123 111 133 120 33 30 •333 .300 Medical Services 801 33 30 53 48 247 222 267 240 67 60 667 600 Legal Services 811 33 30 53 48 247 222 267 240 67 60 667 600 Real Estate Services 651 100 90 160 144 740 666 800 720 200 180 2,000 1,800 Instrmm 604 33 30 53 48 247 222 267 240 67 60 667 600 Fire 602,12 17 15 27 24 123 111 133 120 33 30 333 300 Invesbmnts 621 100 90 160 144 740 666 '2220 800 ' 720 'F400 200 180 2 1 800 6� Subtotal 33.' 0 7 661 600 fi Phase III Hiscell—maaae Services 739 14 13 23 21 107 96 116 104 29 26 289 260 Medical Services 801 29 26 46 41 214 193 231 208 58 52 578 520 Legal Services 811 29' 26 46 41 214 193 231 208 58 52 578 520 Real Estate Services 661 87 78 139 125 641 577 693 624 173 I56 1,733 1,560 Irwivall 605 29 26 46 41 214 193 231 208 58 52 578 520 C� Finance 602,12 14 13 23 21 107 96 116 104 29 26 289 260 Investments 621 87 78 139 125 641 577 693 624 173 156 -220 1 733 1 560 Sttrtatal 462 41 1,925 ,311 578 778 Z Grand Total �, ffi9 1, lfi 2, 062 1� 9, 538 8, 5&5 101311 9, 28() 2, 578 2, 320 Source: Parmer, Siler, George Associates. II III JII _J l _ _ d L Illy _L. 1l ._1_J1 L - t- • Table 10.3.1. PE1i? M RETAIL' OfLO W (ON S�A1 th*r $8,000 $6I4L499 15 000-524 $25�S491999 $50 000 or lore Total fm�1 T e SIC Codes Rij E& R Ej q�e kq &firL RF EvRfe Roe I sec aty Foods 549 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 3 Dng Shone 591 1 1 11 10 8 7 0 0 0 0 20 18 St sat 541 2 2 32 28 24 22 1 1 1 1 60 54 LigwAflne 592 0 0 3 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 4 CwdsAifts 594 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 4 Beafty Salon 723 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 Clevers/Shoe Neptir 724 0 0 '0 33 2 2 0 0 0 5 5 Banter 9w 724 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 Phase If Jr. ftwbut Stn 531 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Specie ty Foods 549 0 0 4 4 3 3 1 0 0 0 8 7 Cie Jewelry 563 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 3 Ja elry 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fast Foods 581 1 1 11 10 8 7 0. 0 0 0 20 18 j wwstatnnt WAigw 581 2 2 28 23 18 18 1 1 1 1 50 45 Ladies' Speciality 59 1 1 12 10 7 7 0 0 0 0 20 18 S ms Ladies" 566 0 0 4 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 7 6 Sporting Goof 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 Tour Stom 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Damrattwe Accessories 593 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fabric Shop 594 0 0 3 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 6 5 Plant Store 526 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cwtains and Drapes 571 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C�3 L i I � i�, 11111�11�1111� IIII r IJ_ 1�l_,V�Iiil���llii,i�ll.�.i_�a���,ll.IiV y 4 :x t- Y4610 10.3. FMOM MAI BYPlD4M g QM S WO % SS�bb-Si4 $15 000-524 000-549 If z% or ! � Tow % Tie SIC Cade Ert�i@1 tip Fg Enp 6�? FEq' Phase II cant! � taaot ve 599 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 Hobby Shop 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d 0 0 0 Acts & Crafts 594 0 0 0' 0 0 d 0 0 tP 0 0 0 tlth Spa 729 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MNie Theater 783 0 0 _ 5 4 2 2 0 0 0 7 6 on* 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mmf Vw 561 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 if 0 0 0 Mms' Sys 5 Athletic i films" 565 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Woks 5 S tie ''- 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6) 0 0 0 Balk Shoe 594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6P 0 0 0 AdIqNist al ' 573 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8' 0 0 0 ds 5 Tapes 573 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6' 0 0 0 Sal 9 M 45 4`3 1 1 1)' 1 M TM Phan III 0 Jr. awrowt Store 531 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b' 0 0 0 Speciality weds 549 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d. 0 0 0 Cashve Jaelry 563 0 0 5 4 4 4 0 0 6' 0 9 8 Jo elry '" 5% 0 0 3 3 2 2 0 0 6 0 5 5 Fast Foods 581 0 0 3 3 2 2 0 0 6 0 5 5 Restarant %Kiq' 581 0 0 5 5 4 3 0 0 6 0 9 8 Ladies, Speciality 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6' 0 0 0 S m, ladies' " 5w 1 1 15 14 12 11 1 1 0 30 v p iii� ����u�IdVI IIEJ ad d d�dlilllflllVdd'�III�VII��I ��_a. �. _ IN 1111hu Table 10.3.1. PMOM MAIL 9VLp111W (NIMI) Contirm Under $8 000 'x_ $8,000- 1S 4,999 x $15,000-$24,999 # x $3 000-$49 999 x 50 000 or ft* x Totala r�amt x kbil Cate0orlr SIC Code 6W 1�g Ei� P Bfp f Ffiase III CMt. 563 3 3 37 34 28 24 1 1 1 1 70 63 Shaw, Wies' 566 1 1 16 14 12 11 1 1 0 0 30 27 Spartirg comts 594 1 1 10 9 7 6 0 0 0 0 18 16 Toy Stom 594 0 0 4 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 6 5 Dawrative Accessories 50 0 0 3 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 5 5 Fabric Shop 94 0 0 7 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 12 11 Plant Stom S26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 optical 599 0 0 3 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 5 5 Ckains ard IMWes 571 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 3 Arft=tive 5% 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 4 ftby Shop 594 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 3 Arts & Crafts 594 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 4 Health Spa 729 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 4 NNie Theater m 1 1 11 10 8 7 0 0 0 0 20 18 bank 783 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Puns' War 561 0 0 7 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 12 11 Pam' Sues & Athletic blear" 566 1 1 13 12 10 9 0 0 0 0 24 22 Cmm p 594 0 0 4 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 7 6 Boaks & Statiwm 5% 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 Bath Slop 594 0 0 7 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 12 11 ALdio/Visual 573 0 0 3 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 5 5 Amds & Tapes S aul 573 0 3 0 8 4 TO 3 152 2 T9 2 1% 0 3 0 3 0 11 0 1 6 5% S N t brand TOW i 3 TS io 3 3 ii3 a G� Suu: Hamner, Siler, George Associates. l��II'llil'I , Illil!I��II�d�!��I�ll�llll�' �iWld����III Ilhl�l I , � _I � llplll� ���I�I�I_E��II�III • Table 10.3.1. PB MW RETM'DROifN!' (WO S�ARFA tkdr $8,000 $B%,000-$14,999 $15 000-$24 999 000- 9 999 �000 or More Total 1 SIC Code Emp R Eip R� 6Tp R EQ RI E" F _E�R R R" III Vortirg s� 594 1 1 10 9 7 6 0 0 .0 0 18 16 Toy Stare 594 0 0 3 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 6 5 D=ntive Acessor ies 593 0 0 3 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 5 5 Fabric Ship 594 0 0 7 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 12 11 PI ant Store 526 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Optical 599 0 0 3 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 5 5 Curtains ard Drapes 571 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 3 Autawtive 559 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 10 0 4 4 Mtty Shop 594 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 10 0 3 3 Arks 8 Crafts 5% 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 '0 0 4 4 Health Spa 729 0 0 2 3 2 1 0 0 ;0 0 4 4 Movie Theater' m 1 1 11 11 8 6 0 0 10 0 20 18 Bane 602 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 10 0 0 0 NMI wur 561 0 0 4 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 6 5 Meta° S'Km h Athletic w^ 566 1 1 12 12 10 9 0 0 11 0 24 22 Cesare sm S94 0 0 4 3 2 2 0 0 10 0 6 5 Bmks 6 Static y 594 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 .0 0 2 2 Bath Shop 5% 0 0 7 6 5 5 0 0" 0 0 12 11 AudigNisual 573 0 0 3 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 5 5 Records 6 Tapes 573 0 0 4 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 6 5 Sc6total I 1 19 03 6 9 79 I Ti � 2' "d 203 3f 99nd Total 21 w '9 1 $ 2 W N Same: Hamaer, Siler, fwiT Associates. i I�I�li�ll ��I�i'Id!�I�� I����I�a�Ylllllll I I II II III I I �I III JAI lii ��lll 'I�I � II II I r VA ME Table 10.3.2. PB?4W OFFICE BROOM (01MII SLOW Wer 000 000- 14 999 999 $25,000-$49,999 $50,000 or More Total Eyl ?fie SIC Code p @ _Ek Enp R�2 Gp Rye Ere Fil Rye Phase I MscelTumm Services 739 Medical Services SDI Legal So -Aces 811 Real Estate Services 661 Insure 641 Finmm 602912 b westmants 621 total RUM if �aneous services 739 Medical Services SDI Legal Services 811 Real Estate Services 661 finale 605 Finance 602912 bwesbu is 621 S'd"al 13 12 20 1s 95 86 102 91 26 23 41 37 189 170 204 184 77 69 123 111 567 510 613 552 26 23 41 37 189 170 204 184 13 12 20 Is 95 86 102 91 77 69 .123 Ill 567 510 613 552 26 23 41 37 189 170 204 184 N 231 469 30 �1 1,702 2, 42 �838' 8 7 12 11 58 52 62 56 16 14 25 23 115 104 124 ill 16 14 25 23 115 104 124 ill 47 42 75 68 345 311 373 335 16 14 25 23 115 104 124 ill 8 7 12 11 58 52 62 56 47 42 75 68 345 311 373 335 Ts M I9038 rM 1,115 26 51 153 51 Z6 153 51 51'1 16 31 31 93 31 15 93 311 I 23 2% 230 46 511 460 138 1,533 1,380 46 511 460 23 2% 230 138 1,533 1,380 46 511 460 460 T, 11 TIO 14 156 140 28 311 29D 28 311 28D 84 933 840 28 311 280 14 156 140 84 933 840 260 M To I dll II s� 1' r ;I Table 10.3.2. FffMW OFFICE 84P1A4W (GM �118gPFAZ i Under $8,000 �000-514 z999 $15�000-$24,999 $25 000-549 999 $50 000� Total ,�_� SIC Cab I& RiTEE 3 @1 _M _ Cm MASS III lRscellw ous Services 739 12 11 20 18 90 81 98 88 24 22 244 220 Medical Sevices 801 24 22 39 35 181 163 196 176 49 44 489 440 t,ePl Services 811 24 22 39 35 181 163 196 176 49 44 489 440 1W Estate Services 661 73 66 117 105 543 489 587 528 147 132 1,467 19320 Finance 605 24 22 39 35 181 163 1% 176 49 44 489 440 Finance 602,212 12 11 20 18 90 81 98 88 24 22 244 220 Lmstm nts 62 73 ' 66 M 117 105 543 489 587 528 147 132 1 467 1 320 S�toKil N-1 Elf YTO9 1,629 1,958 ,760 489 &md Total 9M MT ro 0-41 W TW TqW F,22 2 4� ,3 11 T, 880 13,111 l3,8W Sotm: Hamner, Siler, George Associates. �A r y *4 ' Table 10.3.3. - EWLOMliW DISiRI NIGH, INDO Al. (CHO SUVW) �000 S8,000414 z999 S15�S24 � $25 000-549 999 $50 OOO�MIa�''e Total 1 gent r SIC Code fib RN ET _ �P t • Ruse I S4 6 5 34 31 120 108 30 27 10 9 200 18D �nting 275 6 5 34 31 120 108 30 27 10 9 200 180 F� Metalworking Nadu II I S Equip. 354 3 3 17 15 60 53 15 14 5 5 100 90 t Optical Ynstmmu 5 is s 383 2 2_. 9 8 28 25 8 7 3 3 50 45 F ftlesale Trade 1J 506 9 8 51 46 180 161 45 41 15 14 300 270 6 Phil is Wush using 422 3 3 17 15 60 53 15 14 5 5 100 90 1 Wcal Medical 6 Dental InstrLmants WOW 384 2 2 'S 9 Tff 8 1R 28 0 25 . 33 8 w1 7 3ff 3 5T 3 '8 50 T-000 45 W dal Printing 275 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Valesale Trade 508 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 italesale Trade 511 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Welesale Trams 50116 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l�talwaricirg 6 Equip. SUAotal 354 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ruse IIY • 5 5 100 90 appeer— rRodwts 264 3 3 17 15 60 53 15 14 ! Coumt al Printing 275 6 5 34 31 120 108 30 27 10 9 200 180 .-J ___ i�ii 1 lii LV� _i Table 10.3.3. DFLOW DISMIRMCN, DOSTRUL (MG SUBM) Urder $8,000 % $8,000-514.999 # % 515 $2z999 $ZS;00 i0oo or V0-$49,999 $50 we Total EVI Lust SIC Code f @1 EM RM ET R2g E�T F§j 6p ft Rme III (Cod.) wulwxmrg Mim. & Equip. 354 3 3 17 is 60 53 15 14 5 5 100 90 Optical Ins' its & Lem 383 2 2 9 8 28 25 a 7 3 3 so 45 Iftlesale Trxia SOB 9 8 51 46 180 161 45 41 is 14 300 270 Public ftehomirg 422 6 5 '34 31 120 108 30 27 10 9 200 ISO Wcal Nedfcal & Wftl Insbunrits 384 2 2 9 8 28 25 8 7 3 3 50 45 Subtotal IT Ulf M 96 533 %1- T37 'R -48- T, UCC 0 §65 Rmd Total w im 7ff n ,072 19 27T T02 9 2,0 TO Sam: Hmm, Siler, George Associates. 1: 1 i �a C. COMPLETE TABLE 10.4: SEASONAL EMPLOYMENT ; Not Applicable -� There is no significant amount of seasonal employment in the project area. �y i% 1 A-13 86-849 Question IOD EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS If assistance for non -infrastructure development will be sought from Federal, State, or other governmental funding programs, specify from what agency, under what program,and in what amount. Housing would be the major non -infrastructure improvement for which governmental financial assistance might be sought. A number of City, County, and Federal programs exist that could be utilized to assist in the development of downtown housing. The amount of funding that would be sought from the various sources can not be specifically identified at this time. FUNDING SOURCES GNMA Tandem This federal programs links financing by GNMA nn e-4_6 ) at 71/2% interest with FHA insurance. The tandem program has been one of the principal means in recent years of financing multi -family housing developments because :}- of the attractive rate of interest. Tandem financing can be used by local housing authorities, non-profit housing corporations, and private for -profit developers. Urban Development Action Grants The City could actively pursue and entertain aevelopment proposals for UDAG's that involve development of .downtown housing so long as this program remains in existence. A UDAG is a federal grant to a city to facilitate private developments that could not take place without public assistance. These developments must have a high ratio of private to public funds. DADE COUNTY TAX-EXEMPT BONDS The Housing Finance Authority of Dade County has We power to issue tax-exempt mortgage yj? revenue bonds for new construction and rehabilitation of multi -family units. It also issues bonds for homeownership, i.e., single-family bonds, that are secured with a second mortgage. In 1985, the Authority issued single-family mortgage revenue bonds for $56.3 million. Projects financed by these tax-exempt bonds are required to designate 20% if all units for low to moderate income persons. Dade CountyHomeownership Assistance Program ISurtax _ Program) n 1983. the ero- a e Soara t cou commissioners enacted a local ordinance which established a surtax of 45 cents per $100 value on deed transfers. All surtax proceeds are laced in a special trust fund to assist - r, low and moderate income families in the purchase or This program provides second mortgage money, with families taking out first mortgages from local financial institutions at regular rates. The second mortgage makes up the difference between ghat the•family can afford (and qualify for) and the cost of the home. Second mortgages have an interest rate of 3% for low income and 6T for moderate income families. The maximum second mortgage would be $35,000, the actual amount would depend on the buyer's income. General obligation Housing Bond The voters of the City of RTa—m n au onz t�ie� sty to issue a general obligation bond for $25,000,000 for the purpose of providing housing for families of low and moderate income throughout the City of Miami. This general obligation bond issue could be used, in conjunction with revenue bond funds provided by Metropolitan Bade County through Little HUD, and could likewise be supplemented by funds provided by the Federal government under the present Section 8 subsidy program. A portion of these housing units could be built in the downtown and near downtown areas, and could provide much needed housing for senior citizens and others. Multi -family mort a e Revenue Bonds The City of Miami is empowered to issue up to -mT=on in multi -family Mortgage Revenue Bonds for rental housing development. Affordable Housing Trust Fund In 1984 the City set a requ7rement in two zoning districts (SPI-5 and SPI-7, both located in the Brickell area) by which all non-residential development over a fixed base FAR (3.25 for SPI-5 and 2.25 for SPI-7) contribute to a housing trust fund a fee of $4.00 or $6.67 per sq.ft. of added floor area. The trust fund is administered by the City and used to assist in developing affordable housing. Housing units financed by the fund will be located within or adjacent to the area from which the contribution was made. Developers may choose an alternative to sponsor construction of 0.15 sq.ft. of residential floor area per sq.ft. of added non-residential floor area. Tax Increment Revenue The City, with the approval of Dade County, can issue 5o5ds to finance public investments in a designated redevelopment district. The City and County property taxes are frozen at current values and a trust fund is established before the bonds are issued. Once the new development has been completed, the additional property taxes that are collected in the trust fund are used to make the payments on the bonds. i Table 10.5. 'AD VALOREM REVENUES (CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT) Phase I Phase 11 Phase III Total Total Value $860,893,396 $436,721,818 $600,474,015 $1,898,089,229 Assessment 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 Ratio Homestead $15,000,000 $12,000,000 $15*300,000 $42,300,000 Exemption jj Taxable $630,670,047 $315,541,364 $435,055,511 51t381,266,922 Value Tax Rate 29.3881 29.3881 29.3881 29.3881 ($/1000) Ad Valorem $18,534,194 $9,2739161 $12,785,455 $40,5929810 Taxes Revenues To: City ?J $6,2169578 $391109323 $4,828,386 $13,615,286 $10,1050349 SchooT 3 $4,613,982 $2,308,501 $3,182,866 SFWM!D 4 $276,864 $138,523 $1909989 $606,376 DDA 5 $315,335 $157,771 $2179528 $690v633 Library_V $287,586 $1439887 $198,385 $629,858 County y $4,713,628 $2,358,356 $3,2519605 $10,3239589 County -Debt $816,087 $408,311 $562,962 $1,787,359 City -Debt $1,294,135 $647,491 $892,734 $2,834,360 jj Assumes that 60% of the units will be owner -occupied at $25,000 per ownership unit. 2/ Millage rate equals 9.8571 Millage rate equals 7.316 rate equals 0.439 YJMillage Millage rate equals 0.5 Millage rate equals 7.474 Millage rate equals 1.294 Source: Hammer, Siler, George Associates. Table 10.5. AD VALOREM_ REVENUES (BRICKELL SUBAREA Phase I Phase I1 Phase III Total Total Value $1,051,188,739 $543,166,850 $509,941,554. $2,1g4,2979143 Assessment 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 Ratio Homestead Exemption J Taxable Value Tax Rate ($/1000) Ad Valorem Taxes $30,750,000 $21,750,000 $22,500,000 $75,000,000 $7571641,554 $385,625,138 $359,956,166 $1,503,222*858 29.3881 29.3881 29.3881 29.3881 $229265,646 $11,332,790 $10,5789428 $449176,864 Revenues To: City � s7,468,149 S3, 801,146 $305480124 $14,817,418 $10,997,578 School 3 $5,542,906 $332,605 $2,821,234 $169,289 $2,633,439 $1589021 $659,915 SFWHD DDA §/ $378,821 $192,813 $179,978 $751,611 Library 6 $345,485 $175,845 $1649140 $685,470 County 7 $5,662,513 $2,882,162 $2,690,312 $11,235,088 County -Debt J $980,388 $498,999 $465,783 $1,945,170 City -Debt $1,554,680 $791,303 $7389630 $3,084,613 Assumes that 60% of the units will be owner -occupied at $15,000 per ownership unit. 2/ Millage rate equals 9.8571 Millage V rat4 equals 7.316 YMillage rate equals 0.439 rate equals 0.5 FMillage / Millage rate equals 0.456 Millage rate equals 1.294 County debt millage rate equals 1.294 City debt millage rate equals 2.054 Source: Hamer, Siler, George Associates. as- 86­'844' 0 r -- _ 10.1 Table 10.5. AD VALOREM REVENUES (OMNI SUBAREA) Phase I Phase II Phase III Total 5286,, 494., 475 5148, 274, 750 .$240,,J0, 239 _ , S.764,9389464 AsFessment 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 Ratio Homestead $7,500,000 $4,500,000 $6,000,000 $189000,000 Exemption Taxable Value $207,370,856 $144,206,063 $204,126,929 $555,703,858 Tax Rate ($/1000) 29.3881 29.3881 M3881 29.3881 Ad Valorem Taxes $6,094,235 $4,237,942 $5,998,903 $16,3319080 Revenues To: City 2/ $2,044,075 $1,421,454 $2,0129100 $5,4479628 Schoo 3 $1,517,125 $1,055,012 $19493,393 $4,065,529 SFWMD $91,036 $63,306 $89,612 $2439954 DDA J $103,685 $72,103 $1029063 $277,852 Library 6 $94,561 $65,758 $939082 $253,401 County Webt $1,549,090 ;1,017,796 $1,525*645 $4,153,331 County- $268,338 $186,603 $264,140 $719,081 City -Debt J $425,525 $2959911 $4189868 $1,1409304 J Assumes that 60% of the units will be owner -occupied at $15,000 per ownership unit. 2/ Millage rate equals 9.8571 Millage rate equals 7.316 ratio equals 0.439 FJMillage Millage rate equals 0.5 J6 Millage rate equals 7.456 7 Millage rate equals 1.294 County debt millage rate equals 1.294 City debt millage rate equals 2.052 Source: Hammer, Siler, George Associates. ,.:_;,_� i CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT Table 10.6: Non -Ad Valorem Tax Revenues Phase I Phase 11 Phase III Total Building Permit��,S� 462,r'00 ~5 21;,4"0 3I1,720 $ 9889120 Energy 153,750 74,500 106,975 335,225- Water & Sewer 261,450 102,960 109,440 473,850 Fire Flow 4 8,715 3,432 30648 15,795 Plumbing 5 24,543 10,872 19,350 54,765 Airconditioning 138,375 679050 96,278 3019703 Electrical 1 110,700 539640 77,022 241,362 Zoning Variance 184,500 89,400 128,370 4029270 Major _Use 9/ 61,500 29,800 42,790 -134,090 People Mover 10 1,107,000 536,400 770,220 2,413,62O Total Fees $2,512,533 $1,182,454 $1,665,813 $5,360,800 1/ Building Permits Energy $0.025 Water & Sewer $9O0.O0 _ Fire $30.00 Plumbing 54.50 Airconditioning $4.50 Electrical $0.90 i Zoning Variance $0.03 Major Use .$0.O1 _ People Mover $0.18 Source: Miami Downtown Development Authority. .. CrnrrA• ii'1r•M•N C�1F�. rrn•rn %:• r• slr' -36- t 8V��' BRICKELL SUBAREA Table 10.6: Non -Ad Valore-m-Ta-xRevenues Phase I Phase II Phase III Total Building Permit 3 411,700 S 223,700 S 215,000 S 850,400 Energy 2/ 147.075 03,500 81,250 312,625 • Water & Sewer 143,190 50,130 67,410 260,730 Fire Flow 4 4,773 1,671 2,247 8,691 Plumbing 5 22,860 12,285 11,970 47,115 Airconditioning 1 133,088 75,150 73,125 281,363 Electrical J 106,470 60,120 58,500 225,090 Zoning Variance 1 177,450 100,200 97,500 375,150 Major Use J 59,150 33,400 32,500 125,050 People Mover LOJ 1,183,000 668,000 650,000 2,501,000 Total Fees $2,389,556 $1,308,156 $1,289,502 $4,9879214 J Building Permits 2/ Energy $0.025 Water 3 Sewer $900.00 Fire $30.O0 Plumbing $4.50 YAirconditioning $4.50 $0.90 WElectrical W Zoning Variance $0.O3 Major Use $0.O1 10 People Mover $0.18 Source: Miami Downtown Development Authority. -350 I i - 4r� OMNI SUBAREA Table 10.6.: Non -Ad Valorem Max Revenues Phase I Phase II Phase III total Building Permit J $ 229,000 91,Z03 $ 202,4C0 3 523,2C0 Energy gJ 76,250 31,500 67,000 174,750 Water & Sewer 36,000 41,850 52,380 130,230 Fire Flow 1,200 1,395 1,746 4,341 Plumbing 5 11,070 7,596 9,720 28,386 Airconditioning 54,900 28,350 60,300 125,820 Electrical J 68,625 22,680 48,240 173,100 Zoning Variance J 91,500 37,800 80,400 130,900 - Major Use V 30,500 12,600 26,800 69,900 People Mover LOJ 610,000 252,000 636,000 1,398,000 Total Fees $1,209,045 $S271S71 $1,084,986 $2,758,627 Permits YBuilding YJEnergy $0.025 Water & Sewer $900.00 J4 FPlumbing Fire $30.00 $4.50 Y, Airconditioning $4.50 J Electrical $0.90 /o Variance $0.03 tZoning Major Use $0.01 People Mover $0.18 Source: Miami Downtown Development Authority. -37- i r r G. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE MARKET STUDY PREPARED AS THE BASIS FOR PROJECTING THE AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT IN EACH DEVELOPMENT PHASE. a� i A copy of the market study prepared for the p,Arject area by Hammer Siler �. George Associates is included in Appendix A. ` i j H. COMPLETE TABLE 10.7 TO SHOW THE ESTIMATED CAPITAL COSTS FOR ADDITIONAL 11 PUBLIC FACILITIES NEEDED TO SERVE THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. (To be provided after review of all questions) I. COMPLETE TABLE 10.8. (Public facility or service operating costs) (To be provided after review of all questions) J i 1 �I 8 -849 Olk QUESTION 11: - TRANSPORTATION A. COWITTED, PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 1. ON MAP J, THE TRAFFIC IMPACT AREA DEFINED AT THE PREAPPLICATION CON- FERENCE, HIGHLIGHT THE ROADWAY SEGMENTS AND CRITICAL INTERSECTIONS INCLUDED IN THE RESP014SE TO QUESTION 11. The traffic impact area was mutually agreed upon, during the preappli- cation, conference with the staff of the South Florida Regional Planning Council. The traffic impact area (MAP J-A) is made up of two components. First, is the Downtown Miami DRI study area (Map J-B) which is generally .defined as N.E./N.W. 17th Street on the north, S.E./S.W. 15th Road on the south, Biscayne Bay on the east and, Metrorail, 1-95 and the FEC railroad on the west. The Downtown Study area is comprised of three subareas; Omni, CBD and Brickell which are the subject of this report. The S.E. Overtown/ParkW¢st area will be studied in a forthcoming ADA. The Port of Miami, although outside the study a- i, has to be included for traffic analysis purposes, because all Pom traffic flows through the Downtown Street system. An ADA for the Port was filled in 1979. The second component of the traffic impact area is the major arterial and expressway serving Downtown. These regionally significant roadways, also defined during the preapplication conference, include; Brickell Avenue/Bayshore Driveg, S.W. 3rd Avenue/Coral Way, S.W. 7th and 8th Streets, West Flagler Street, Biscayne Boulevard and MacArthur Causeway for a distance of three miles outside the study area boundary and Interstate 95, S.R. 836 and U.S. 1 for a distance of five miles outside the study area boundary. Based on these criteria, the traffic impact area is generally defined as North 79th Street on the north, LeJeune Road (West 42nd Avenue) on the west and south and, Alton Road on the east. . Map J-A, the traffic impact area, highlights the roadway segments be to analyzed in this study. Critical intersections (Map J-B) to be analyzed were defined during the preapplication conference. The concept used in defining these intersections was one of trying to provide a cordon line around each of the downtown subareas and also to provide a few intersections internal to these subareas. A list of roadway segments and critical intersections analyzed in this study are contained in the Appendix. GHT ALL COMMITTEL. .. IN THE ADOPTED TRANSPORTATION IfROVEMEfiT Pit ('TIP) OR FUNDED PRIVATELY. Maps J-1A and B show committed transportation improvements within the J '�: ,' traffic i—Ac*. arpr . Tt,=-,e imorover.ents have been obtained from the 6iii rwi _ - � � rws tam � rrr wi ipr..� owl► *� I 111114 ff." F Is d '+aYa D mmmnra �Mo OI MNo. Ad W& iwpiL rmw b/ Mia *a WAWWAr/ Ad Mlwbra it �rAwML as MAID J®1 A. COMMITTED IMPROVEMENTS A DOWMTfm _ . 86 �' ,. a. 40 r me 0 DowNTowNWW" MASTERF F Department of Transportation's Five Year Construction Program, the City of Miami's Capital Improver.lent Program (CIP) and Development Orders issued for major projects within the Downtown area. Committeo transpor- tation improvements, for the purposes of this study, are defined as (1) those having construction funds allocated for the current year in the Capital or Transportation Improvement Program (2) projects which are currently underpay and (2) �hoSe r_quired by a Cavelc;.m r:t Order. 3. ON MAP J-2, HIGHLIGHT ALL PROGRAMMED TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT. Maps J-2A and B show the programmed improvements that are included in the Five Year Transportation Improvement Programs and the City's Five Year Capital Improvement Program. The City of Miami has $3,000,000 .programmed for roadway improvements during the next 5 years. The roadways to be improved have not been identified. 4. COMPLETE TABLE 11.1: COMMITTED IMPROVEMENTS. Table 11.1 - Committed Improvements has been completed as requested. S. COMPLETE TABLE 11.2: PROGRAMMED IMPROVEMENTS. Table 11.2 - Programmed Improvements has been completed as requested. A letter trod the Florida Department of Transportation confirming Committed and Programmed roadway improvements is contained in the Appendix. 6. IDENTIFY ALL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE NETWORK FOR EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT. For Phase 1 development, only those improvements which are identified on Maps J-lA and B and Table 11-1 which have been committed are included for analysis purposes. These include the following Downtown improvements. 1. Reconstruction of S.W. 8th Street form 1-95 to U.S. 1 to provide four lanes. 9 Reconstruction of the I-95 mainline from the Downtown Distributor to .-395/S.R. 836 and the widening of the Downtown Distributor north- bound entrance ramp onto I-95. This reconstruction will provide an additional lane on the mainline and also on the entrance ramp. improvement includes a new six lane high-level bridge and also major modifications to the Biscayne Boulevard/Port Boulevard Intersection. 4. Brickell Avenue/S.E. 10th Street. Signalization and southbound left turn lane. 01* i� r . i i �j 1 OW Nrnew Awl era b w. wwrr► wa Aid was at WAffiWWW4kAWA A#d wt fil, 1 -4 - - 11 aggwawft OanAoirra �a MAP J-2A PROGRAMMED IMPROVEMENTS DmNTowNl#V"ASTER PLAN .z. Ifll ill�lll�i�ill�d�l�� ��ll��l��ll�illll�i� l ��ll��l��l��i'��III'ildl��llil��► IV,Illlilllll l � r i��li6i„ l,. �.+ ���� :: ,.,. a ABLE 11.1: mmiTTED IMPROVEMENTS t C0STI 2 ION IMPROVEID:NT - - WAY fit. cons ru" ction --- w6wo to U.S. 1 L 2,797,000 oKn Distributor 395/SR 836 ��den'Qntrance rasp 2 Street, 3 Street 6 Reconstruct -_- 4 Street yne Blvd. to 1Ave. �- Bridge New 6 Lane Bridge --- 1 to Dodge sand • 13 St. t Ave. to 2 Ave Drainage 112 22 Ave to Road Reconstruction --- 12 Ave 54 St. to Southbound Frontage --•. 52 St. Road 39 St. to Road reconstruction --- 58 St. I-95/Nov Connector 1 CONSTRUCTION n erway Underway s 19775,000 1986/1987 $271,4919000 1986/1988 S 22 AO 1986/1981 39390.000 1986/1987 $ 8309000 1986/1987 $ 19598,000 1986/1987 TABLE 11.1: COMMITTED IMPROVEMENTS (Cont.) C0STi 'ATION IMPROVEMENT RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION 112 to NOV Bridge --- $2494509000 1986/1987 _!. 49 St. I .5 . 25 Rd. •. 2 Lane Ramps --- $ 5999000 1986/1987 i -'. 14 Street 4 Lane --- $ 6509000 1986/1987 ;. 10 Ave. I-95 17 Ave. 4 Lane --- $ 3,600.000 1986/1987 . 11 to Flagler _ 1I eet w rorail Parking 2,645 Spaces --- $20,662,000 1986/1987 robus 50 buses --- = 79875,000 1986/1987 ckell Ave./ Turn Lane A --- ; 95,000 1986/1987 a 10 St. Signalization ' ickell Ave./ F. 12th St. Signalization --- $ 709000 1986/1987 ckell Ave./ Signalization --- $ 90,000 1986/1987 .1. 14th St. Modify Intersection . 13 St./ ��. 15 Rd./ Signalization -« s 70.000 1986/1987 - . rc, 3 Ave. Striping s ; In- Dollars* Includes design, construction and construction inspection. I IIi jI`iti+Il ��II'I',I� I IIII I s III�1iIlil�Vlillllllill� I��I�dIiII�I�IiIIuI�III�Y�I �itl��s6l�+Biili l� lIILGYiII�V�6 li lolll ,I 1 14111 I� io lilt i1d 1 I 1 11 1 J I IIIII tlill�IVlilllll II lil�h�IV�ifl III I�III _I tllI I._ tl ��I�Iloiili TABLE 11.2 RR06RAMMEO IMPROVEMENTS C0STl 1%TION IMPROVEMENT DESIGN RIGHT-OF-WAYCONSTRUCTION Irthur Causeway Reconstruction --- --- $ 14.999,000 1989/1990 tson Island to '.t bridge . Sth St. Construction --- -•- $ 595959000 1988/1989 J. 27 Ave. to 4 Lanes 4. 42 Ave. 112 Connector --- =`` --- $ 19.612p000 1987/1988 )ort to K.W. 36 St. :ckell Bridge Replace Bridge $ 4109000 " ' --- $ 893299000 1988/1989 itown stributor Surface St. --- --- $ 293329000 1987/1988 Improments . 27 Ave. . 11 St. to Add Lanes $ 7509000 $ 3259000 $ 790929000 1988/1989 . 43 St. . 7 St. Low Level Bridge $ 200,1000 --- $ 2.2079000 1990/1991 :sold Canal ' 54 St. to Northbound $ 200.000 $ 299779000 $ 390659OW 1989/1990 �. 62 St. Frontage Rd. `;�36 Interchange Ramp to N.N. 8 St. --- $ 1789OW $ 6.446.00 1988/1989 36 to SR 112 Auxillary Lanes --- $ 193069000 $ 16.913.000 1990/1991 U2 to NW 54 St. N.B. Exit Ramp $ 4009000 $ 659000 $ 295209000 1989/19r0 III I� +V 2 Y I ffII yy Ilil� ill �I� TABLE 11.2 PRMAM D IMPROVEMENTS (Copt.)_ C 0 S Ti CONSTRUCTION TION I14PROVE4ENT - 2 ? 32 St. to Widen Bridge $ 1759000 --- $ 49250,000 1990/1991 42 St. town Streets Rebuild --- --- $ 3*000,000 w 1987/1990 orail Parking 1,650 Spaces --- --- $ 11,200,000 1987/1988 mover Br•ickell 8 Omni $89000.000 $179500.000 $214,500.000 1988/1990 II Extensions )bus 428. Buses $ 73,674,000 1987/1991 Sit in im Dollars. Includes construction and construction inspection. y 6. Brickell Avenue/S.E. 14th Street. Signalization and intersection modification. 7. S.M. 13th Street/S.W. 15th Road/S.W. 3rd Avenue. Intersection signalization and restriping. These last five improvements are required by Development Orders for mat-r Projects within the Downtown Stuay area. 8. EXISTING TRAFFIC ON COM+tITTED ROADWAY NETWORK 1. COMPLETE TABLE 11.3 BY PROVIDING PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES FOR THOSE REGIONALLY SIGNIFICANT ROADWAY LINKS DEFINED AT THE PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE THAT ARE OUTSIDE THE DOWNTOWN DRI BOUNDARY AND ALL MAJOR COLLECTORS AND ARTERIALS INSIDE THE DOWNTOWN DRI BOUNDARY, FOR ALL ONE-WAY STREETS AND ROADWAY IRKS WHERE VOLUMES ARE IMPACTED BY EXPRESSWAY ACCESS PROVIDE AM PEAK -HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES. Table 11.3 - Existing Traffic on Comnitted Roadway Network has been completed to show peak -hour traffic volumes, capacities, peak hour volume to capacity (V/C) ratios and peak hour levels of service as required. For ease of analysis and projecting future excess capacity, as required by the areawide DRI questionaire, Table 11.3 has been divided based on roadway links generally serving each of the Downtown subareas. Therefore Table 11.3 has been provided for the Omni sub -area, CBD sub -area and the Brickell sub -area for the PM peak hour and AM peak hour as applicable. Based on the Volume to Capacity (V/C) ratio analysis procedures used in this study almost all the roadway segments within the study area exhibit very good operating conditions. In fact, only Coral Way between Brickell Avenue and S.W. 15th Road (westbound LOS "E") and Brickell Avenue between S.E. 2nd Street and S.E. 7th Street (southbound LOS "F") /'1 in the PM peak hour and N.E. 2nd Avenue between I-395 and Flagler Street (southbound LOS "F") in the AM peak hour have poor operating conditions. It is important to understand that these operating conditions are wasured over a one hour period. This type of analysis is therefore not extremely sensitive to peak 15 and 30 minute surges which occur on the Downtown streets. Volume to Capacity ratio analysis techniques and resultant levels of service can be very misleading when applied to Expressway links. Generally, this analysis methodology will show operating conditions to be better than perceived or actually exist. This occurs because the assigned capacity is based on the number of thru lanes and ideal operating conditions. V/C analysis does not account for extreme weaving conditions, interference from exit ramp queues and constraints from expressway to arterial connections. 01-in " $144 4 QOIIITOIM NIARI MI Table 11.31 EIISTINB TRAFFIC ON COINIITTEB ROOMY NETNW Areal O1N11 Satariol AN ' ;r 1 I I Neea{ttr I I---------rttt-Horr---»----~----1 t .:.F Seeteeet 1 Fron I To 1 of Lanes IPirtctlonl VoluaelCuacitvlEecess C.1 Y/C US 1 SR 63i/1 3" Niscayee Blvd. 1 45 X FN EN :< 2L FV wo -r< 19S M.Y. 27 Art. SL FV EB SL FV V1 N.Y. 27 Avt. Lt?tvrtt Rd. X FV EJ SL FV YB e j NacArtbvr Cury. Altos Rd. lisca7nt Blvd. 3l FV E1 l Si. FV Y1 Biscayne Blvd. M.E. 62 St. N.E. 36 St. 2L NB 2L SB N.E. u St. 1 395 2L Nt 2L SB rx _= M.E. I Ave. N.E. 17 St. Hasler St. M. NB i1O 1t2O 1210 0.35 A 0L SB 0 0 0 NA IM Miani Are. N. 36 St. N. 17 St. 2L Na _ 2L SB r N.Y. 1 Ave. N.Y. 20 St. Flaller St. IL NB IL so . 2 Ave. N.Y. 20 St. Fla@ler St. IL N8 IL a 1 ys N.Y. 79 St. SR 112 SL FN M SL FN SI BR 112 SR SU/1 393 SL FY NB SL FN SI i1-184 0 42101111 BOMNTOMN MIAMI DRI Table 11.3: HISTiN6 TRAFFIC ON COMMITTED ROABMAY NETMQRK Area: EMI SCNIif10: PM --«..... __ ------------ ----------------- Nu-----------------�___--- t b �___.—__ �Ftak-ffour----------.__1. ------------------- ...5 Sgment I Fro To ; of tanninDirectiani ---------- —------ Poluor:Capacity,EKcess C.l VIC MOS 1 SR SSW 395 Biscayne Blvd, 1 95 — 2L FM EB — ---------- 2300 r_______�.___����.�__ s • 2L FV M8 1880 • 1 95 N.V. 27 Ave, 3L FV EB 2540 a X FV NO 3820 a N.M. 27 Ave. le me Rd. A FM EB 3190 a 3L FM V6 4790 a MacArthur Coy. Alton Rd. Biscayne Blvd. 3L FM EB 2100 a 3L FV VB 1720 s Biscayne Blvd. N.E. 62 St. N.E. 36 St. 2L NB IB09 1360 -449 1.33 F 2L SB 12" 1360 70 0." E '1 N.E. 36 St. 1 395 2L N8 1634 1360 -274 1.20 F --1 2L SB lost 1360 329 0.76 C M.E. 1 Ave. M.E. 17 5t-, Flaller St. 3L NB itBS 1920 735 0.62 8 —' OL S8 0 0 0 NA NA Miui Ave. N. 36 St. N. 17 St. 2L NB 465 1360 095 0.34 A 2L SB 384 1360 976 0.28 A N.N. 1 Ave. N.M. 20 St. Flagler St. 1L NB 93 625 532 0.15 A M.M. 2 Ave. N.M. 20 St. Flagler St. It. 11 SB MB 57 459 625 625 569 166 0.09 A 0.73 C — 1L SB 70 625 SM 0.11 A 19S N.M. 79 St. SR 112 5L FM 8 8560 a 5L FM St 5010 a — SR 112 SR 836/1 3" A FM NB mo + A FM. SB 5060 + + Level of Service is a fusctisa of system awatimms and uterul lnflnea+ces. ii tt:s�nu DOWNTOWN Mimi ORE Table 11.3: EIISTIN& TRAFFIC ON COMMITTED ROADWAY NETNORK Area: CID k"arim AM -------•-------- ---------- -------------------- S- SeOleet ; Froe I To S 0 LinesOiDirection; Volum Map &city,'Excess C.1, V/C,'LOS I ►ort Bridge Port of Miaai Biscayne Blvd. 3LD EI 1030 2280 1250 0.45 A -M RO NB 3S5 2280 1925 0.16 A N. 6 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L NB 210 1170 960 0.18 A N. s it. Biscayne Blvd, 1 95 R EI 470 1920 1450 0.24 A OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA N. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L YI 260 1170 910 0.22 A Flaller St. Biscayne Blvd. N. 2 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L MB 323 1170 645 0.20 A W. 2 Ave. N. 27 Ave. IL EB _ 2L Wt 1. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. S.M. 2 Ave. R Ell 1150 1920 770 0.60 A OL WB 0 0 0 NA NA - S.Y. 2 Ave. S.M. 27 Ave. 3l a 930 2180 1250 0.43 A OL WB 0 0 0 NA NA Biscayee Blvd. 1 39s Port Blvd. RD NB 1038 2290 1242 0.46 A 3Lo SR Isis 2280 763 0.66 B Port Blvd. S.E. 2 St. 4LD NB 117 MO 2103 0.28 A 3LD SB 1459 2260 822 0.64 B N.E. 2 Ave. 1 395 Fuller St. OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L SB 2135 MO -215 1.11 F Nia•i Ave. N. 17 St. Haller St. OL MB 0 0 0 NA NA , 3L SB 500 1920 1420 0.26 A N. 2 M. Flgler St. S.W. 718 St. it a 214 62s 411 0.34 A 1L SB 453 62s 172 0.72 C i 1S SR Bull m S.W. 8 St. 3LFN a 3LFN D s 8E-849 1 01-JM-10 02t12t/0 POSITION NIMI IRl Tattle 11.31 EIISTINB TRAFFIC ON CMITT13 AOA11A1 NETr1Ktt Area CO . St"ariet PN • �1 1 1 M@@Iet i- { --!'eak-Boer--------------I ! 1et@e@t I Fro@ I To I of Laeestlirectical Velu@eiCaoKitv{Euess C.1 VIC 1L1S I Pert Iridee Port of Rini liscavne Blvd. 3LO El 340 2290 1140 O.IS A 3LO a 700 2290 190 0.31 A N. 6 St. liscayse Blvd. 193 OL EN 0 0 0 I# NA 2L VI 387 1170 793 4.33 A N. S It. Nlscsyne Blvd. 195 3L EN 620 MO I30O 0.32 A OL YI 0 0 0 NA NA N. 1 St. lisayse Blvd. 1 95 OL El 0 0 0 NA NA 2L we 445 1170 725 0.38 A Flatter 1t. liscayne Blvd. V. 2 Ave. OL El 0 0 0 NA NA 2L NB 97 1170 663 4.43 A 1. 2 Ave. 1. 27 Ave. IL E/ 152 713 in 0.19 A 2L W 9" 1170 250 0.79 C Biscayne Blvd. S.Y. 2 Ave. 3L a BSO 1920 1070 0.44 A OL we 0 0 0 NA NA S.N. 2 Ave. S.Y. 27 Ave. 3L EI 561 MO 1612 0.26 A OL a 0 0 0 NA NA Mtxayne Blvd. 13" Part Blvd. 3L1 NI 1626 2210 654 0.71 C AB a 9" 770 I33i 0.40 A Pert 11vd. S.E. 2 It. 41.1 IN 1501 MO 1420 4.51 A . 31.1 Si 1294 2260 9t16 0.37 A M.E. 2 A". 13" Flatlet St. OL is 0 0 0 NA NA 3L a 701 1920 1219 0.37 A Nimi Ave. N. 17 St. Flaller St. OL a 0 0 0 NA NA 3L SI 2SS 1920 1665 0.13 A 1. 2 Ave. Flatlet It. S.N. 7/8 St. 1L a 4" 62S 219 0.63 1 ' IL Y 3" 62S 321 0." A i h 11 owl m " B.M. I! 1t. 3LFN NB • 3LFM SI e 30-SeI.16 `� 1Ot03t32 DOIAITOIM lS1ANI 1RI table 11.3: DISTINB TRAFFIC ON COMMITTED ROADYAY NETOM Area: •IRIOUL Scrnaria: A!t _-__�--'------Petk-N4ur------- ------_� ! 1 1 M Ikreb�--�- Seleeet 1 froe To ; of L:nes;0irection', Mum !Capacity', Excess C.1 VIC 1LOS 1 S. 7 St. Hrickell Ave. 1 95 OL ES 0 0 0 NA NA 3L N8 248 2180 1932 0.11 A 1 95 S.M. 27 Ave. OL ES 0 0 0 NA NA A MH 335 2110 1645 0.15 A S. 1 St. Irickell Ave. 195 4L ES 922 3240 2311 0.28 A _ OL MH 0 0 0 NA NA — 1 95 S.M. 27 Ave. 4L EH 1338 3240 1402 0.41 A OL MH 0 0 0 NA NA Coal IN7 Irickell Ave. S.N. 15 Rd. 2L El 2L MI _ S.Y. lS Rd. S.M. 12 Ave. 2LD EH 2LD YH S.Y. 12 Ave. S.M. 27 Ave. 2LD EI 21.1 YH Irickell Ave. S.E. 2 St. S.E. 7 St. 3L NI It" 2190 M 0.53 A 2L SI 1220 t360 to 0.10 1 S.E. 7 St. Ritkeabacker 2LD NI 2l1 SI Rini Are. Heller St. S. 15 Rd. 3i. a 232 2110 190 0.11 A 31. SI 171 2110 2009 0.01 A S. is Rd. Rickeabicker $0 NI 2L1 SH 1 ?S S.Y. 8 St. US 1 2LFM NH 2LFY S1 �'° S.Y. 17 Are. M YI I.Y. 17 Ave. Doellu M. 313 IN 3u Si - qydwre 1r. Rickw"ker S.M. 27 Are. 2U MI 2U SI *420-M "135121 r OOMNTONI NiANI MI Table 11.31 EIISTINS TRAFFIC ON COIRIITTED M MDNA/ METIMIK ' Area: BRICI(ELL Scesarios f'M ..»------------------------ --- ------------- ------------------_--.----------------------------___._»---_----- ' Nwber Seleent ' From i To i of LanesiDirectioni Volu" UpacityiEness C.i VIC MOS i S. .7 St. kickell Ave. 1 95 OL ED 0 0 0 NA NA x kB 71,11, 0 1473 0.:,2 • 195 S.M. 27 Ave. OL E8 0 0 0 NA NA U. WD 837 2180 1343 0.38 A S. B St. Drickell Ave. 1 95 4L E8 509 3240 2732 0.16 A OL WD 0 0 0 NA NA 1 95 S.M. 27 Ave. 4L ED 1012 3240 2228 0.31 A OL WD 0 0 0 NA NA Coral May kickell Ave. S.M. 15 Rd. 2L ES 262 1360 1078 0.21 A 2L MD 1240 1360 120 0.91 E S.M. 15 Rd. S.W. 12 Ave. 2LD ED 316 1000 1494 0.18 A - 2LD MB 982 1900 816 0.55 A S.M. 12 Ave. S.M. 27 Ave. 2LD ED 1361 1600 439 0.76 C 2LD MB 1545 1800 253 0.66 D Brickell Ave. S.E. 2 St. S.E. 7 St. 2L ND 1221 1360 139 0.90 D A SB 1489 2180 691 0.68 8 S.E. 7 St. Rickenbacker 2L0 ND 377 1800 l423 0.21 A 2LD SD 1579 1800 221 0.80 D Niaoi Ave. Flagler St. S. 15 Rd. A N8 2" 2180 1691 0.14 A A SB 223 2180 1957 0.10 A S. 15 Rd. Rickenbacker 2LD N8 213 1000 1587 0.12 A 2LD Be 953 1900 047 0.53 A 14S S.M. / St. us I in NB 2150 + 2LFM SS 3m e - US 1 1 95 S.W. 17 Ave. AD NB 2270 2785 315 0.12 0 AD SB 3400 2785 -613 1.22 F S.M. 17 Ave. Bull as Rd. AD NB 2237 2785 50 0.80 C AD SB 3411 2785 -633 1.23 F Baydwt Dr. Rickenbacker S.M. 27 Ave. 2LD 4 506 1360 054 0.37 A 2L1 SB 1114 1360 246 0.82 1 a C. TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS 1. COMPLETE TABLE 11.4: PERMITTED DEVELOPMENTS Table 11.4 has been completed for each of the sub -areas within Downtown as well as the Port of Miami. Permitted Developments as shown on Table 11.4 include Uie foliowing types of development. 1. Projects which are complete and less than 90 percent occupied. 2. Projects which are under construction. 3. Project which have received prior approvals. The information shown on Table 11.4 has been provided for each of the sub -areas understudy within the Downtown DRI study area. In addition the Port of Miami and S.E. Overtown/ParkWest have been included because all traffic from these developments has to travel on the Downtown street system being analyzed. The projection of traffic volumes associated with Permitted Developments as well as Additional Approvable Development is based on the trip generation model equations used by Metro -Dade Transportation Administration in there Transportation Plan update. These equations are shown in the Appendix. The general methodology for generating traffic using the trip generation model equations is outlined below. Computer worksheets for permitted development and each development phase are contained in the Appendix. Step #I: Define development parameters in terms of square footage of office space, retail space, the number of dwelling units and other uses as applicable. Step i2: Using data provided by the City of Miami and obtained from Dade County convert development parameters to retail employment, total employment, residential population and other variables required for the trip generation model equations. This step provides the total number of daily home -based and non -home based person trips. ft 'Step #3: Apply a mo& split to the total daily person trips derived in Step 02. Mode split percent -ages, provided by Mietro-Dade County Transportation Administration (see Appendix), vary b, development phase and by sub -area. Application of the mode split percentage to total daily person trips pro -ides the total number of daily auto person trips. - Step #4: Convert daily auto person trips to daily auto trips. For this step an overall vehicle occupancy rate of 1.43 was used. This TABLE 11.4: PERMI'T'a'ED DEVELOPMENTS (1) 0 011 MTE 4 I!) 1�11 tea -Ndlt �— 31s) flip EAR SEW O TFfet I1i;49D') _mMOST-51-4 �T� 3 Muit CON US 10 111 201 431. t0 111 201 Mstdeettel 810 Oo's CO tub Area office 2.8K.300 6oaereteet 4.620 124 2.36S 2.461 5.740 124 2.36S 2.401 Office 1.107.400 Retell "S.S00 Ressdeatul 324 Do's WWI Area Office 5.077.= 001411 334.100 3.1n no 4.107 4.407 3.110 220 4.107 4.407 Restd"tsal 2774 Do's Owtc -ttart Host office SS.100 Ses,+Asr. (8) Area 16.000 tests /6 13 9 6S to 13 S2 a tort Cr 11101(6) SRipplas ... 2.200 2.200 --- 2.700 r.200 va f@1Sc, 1e0 dweletr0aais 0}} trojecu *19t are comple" ad lets tmot m "led. ht1 6p oleets a era wrier eaastraetiea. c}) halectl owick :,tso rml"d prior 0ppmals. 2) All deselopseets glossed to be folly ocaptad 1y the sad of rinse 1: 3) $gears feet or 6r.ts Floor Aro4 ooloss on" otMrnlso. 41 WXn Trip Gavots os Factors wre otitis". S) Form Trips. 6) r401cle Trips. 11 Pomitt" Oefolor-eat only. i) tort AM W soppltmoUl foprmts. =gig ' vehicle occupancy rate is consistent with that used by Metro -Dade Transportation Administration in their Long -Range Transportation Planning Process. - Step N5: This step involves the application of an internal factor to the tot l n+:•-ber of auto tries. For tin 'hrre sub -area, (C-nj, and Brickell) understudy in the Downtown DRI a 5 percent internalization factor was applied. The result of this procedure is the total number of daily external auto trips. ILI - Step 16: Apply a peak hour factor to the total number of external auto trips to determine the number of auto trips entering and exiting Downtown during the AM and PM peak hours. This factor was derived by analyzing traffic counts in the Downtown area for the last five year period. Based on this analysis it was determined that the existing peak hour is 8.6 percent of the total daily traffic. Worksheets supporting this factor for both the AM and PM peak hours are included in the Appendix. Step #7: This step involves determining the number of inbound and outbound trips to the study area during the peak hours. Recent AM and PM peak hour traffic counts were used to determine this inbound/ outbound split. For the AM peak hour a 70 percent and inbound factor and a 30 percent outbound factor were utilized. During the PM peak hour the outbound factor is 70 percent and the inbound is 30 percent. Worksheets documenting this inbound/outbound split of traffic volumes are also contained in the Appendix of the report. Although an 8.6 percent peak hour factor was used for vehicle trips, an analysis to determine the overall peak hour person trips was undertaken. This involves converting the total number of peak hour vehicle trips back to person trips using the 1.43 vehicle occupancy rate previously discussed. Peak hour transit trips, obtained by analyzing recent daily (by hour) Metrorail passenger activity for the Government Center Station, are then added to this. Using this methodology and looking at the Omni, CBD, Bri•ckell, and Overtowm/Park West subareas the actual number of peak hour person trips is 12 percent. This peak hour factor of 12 percent for the total number of person trips, is in fact consistent with the ITE trip generation factors for office developments. Since the Downtown area is predominately an office area and the Permitted Developments are 90 percent office use it would indicate that the methodology and the projections are valid. 2. IN All APPENDIX, PROVIDE M MAPS OF THE TRAFFIC IMPACT AREA (J-3 SERIES) FOR E.`.:;;i r :.:t i irJ D4'.c* (4.0 4 F%3 ;�". Jhi FEni� yti .i;c47 ti�lC tip TiiE PH PEAK HOUR) SHOWING DEVELOPMENT LOCATION APiD THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIPiUTION OF PEAK HM TRIPS. The requested maps have been provided in the appendix for each of the three sub -areas. The locations of Permitted Developments within each of the sub -areas have also been shown. 3. PROVIDE PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR FUTURE TRAFFIC AT ALL COUNT LOCATIONS IDENTIFIED IN TABLE 11.3 FOR EACH DEVELOPMENT PHASE BY Am COMPLETING TABLE 11.5, USING LINK CAPACITIES OF EACH PUBLICLY -PROGRAMED OR PRIVATELY FUNDED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT. DO NOT INCREASE CAPACITY FOR _ ANY IMPROVEMENT IDENTIFIED IN TABLE 11.8 AS "RECOMMENDED". Taaie 11.E - Future Traf;;4 on C,,,.,*inttad ',utwurk,, has been provioeo. Future traffic conditions for all roadway links are shown on Table 11.5 for each of the three development phases. The baseline future traffic ' volumes, on the Downtown study area roadway links, are projected to —' remain constant for two reasons. First, these volumes include traffic generated by existing vacant and under construction developments as well as all approved development. Second, although there may be an increase in background traffic (i.e., external to external trips) this increase will be balanced by a diversion of existing thru trips from the study area roadways. The only exception to this is traffic generated by the Port of Miami which has been included in the projection of future traffic. 4. EXPLAIN THE BASIS FOR ANY ADJUSTMENTS TO VOLUMES SHOWN IN TABLE 11.5 TO ACCOUNT FOR ANY REDUCTION OR INCREASE IN VOLUME DUE TO TRANSIT RIDERSHIP, VEHICLE OCCUPANCY, OR TRIP DIVERSION. For -Phase I there are no adjustments to the volumes shown in Table 11.5 to account for increased transit ridership or higher vehicle occupancies. However there was a minor diversion of trips from Brickell Avenue to I-95 and S.W. 8th Street to account for construction activity. S. FOR THE ROADWAY SEGMENTS IN TABLE 11.5 (TABLE 11.5A IF APPLICABLE) PRO- JECTED TO OPERATE BELOW PEAK HOUR LOS "D" (LOS NE" IN DOWNTOWN) DURING PHASE 1, IDENTIFY THOSE CRITICAL INTERSECTIONS ALONG EACH SEGMENT THAT WERE NOT DEFINED IN THE PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE. FOR EACH CRITICAL INTERSECTION PROVIDE A DETAILED PEAK -HOUR CAPACITY ANALYSIS (USING FHWA'S 1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL OPERATIONS METHODOLOGY). PROVIDE CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS AND COMPUTER PRINTOUTS FOR ALL INTERSECTION IN AN APPENDIX. BOTH AM AND PM PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS ARE NEEDED FOR EXPRESSWAY RANP TERMINI, ONE-WAY STREETS, OR INTERSECTIONS WHERE AN VOLUMES ARE PROJECTED TO BE HIGHER THAN PM VOLUMES. The critical intersections to be analyzed in the Downtown Miami DRI are those defined during the preapplication conference. Following the preapplication conference it was mutually agreed (see Appendix) between the City of Miami and staff of the Regional planning Council to use the Cir J 4r .. . ,cal ;,n31fai., t6h.,.o.osy for int-ersection capacity a„aiysis. AN and PM peak -hour, capacity analysis worksheets for the critical intersections, are contained in the appendix of this r° report. TYPIT -' d Ol-iasrl0 Ohirr34 = OOINTOW MIAMI "I Aw table II.51 FUTtMIE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETMORK Area OMNi TAW T Sceaariot AM 1 t t Nuekrr I t----- ----Peat - - Seietet I From t -_N N-------- _________------------------- To I of LaneslPirKtionl Vol ueetCa•uitv:Eecess C.1 V/C tLOS I _-------------------------------- _----_r.-NN--_.--.-NNN� SR 936/1 395 eiscavee Blvd. 19s 2L FM It 2L F O 4 N.M. 27 Ave. 3L FM EB 3L FM MB M.Y. 27 Ave. Lehune Rd. 3L FM EB 3L FM Yi MacArthur Cary. Alton Rd. Biscayne Blvd. 3L FM EB X FM 91 _� iiscaYne 11vd. N.E. 62 St. N.E. 36 St. 2L N! A _ 2L 61 N.E. 36 St. 1393 2L Ne 2L SB N.E. 1 Ave. M.E. 17 St. Flaoler St. 3L NB 1106 1920 IU 4.56 A i OL SS 0 0 0 NA NA Miami Ave. N. 36 St. N. 17 St. 2L NI = 2L Si N.Y. 1 Ave. M.M. 20 St. Flagler St. IL IM i IL S! M.Y. 2 Ave. M.M. 20 St. Flagler St. 1L NI IL 9 1 9S N.M. 79 St. SR 112 SL FM 5L FY SI SR 112 SR 936/1 3" SL FM MN 3 1 SL FM SI • y - v Ol•�ae•� _— 02:07s18 , DOINITOIIN NiANi ORI Table 11.51 FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETVORK 405 Area: ONNI Scenario: PM -----.-_»-----•--� ----------------------------- --------- »»»»»-�»:i--------_ Nuaber-- ;---------Peak-Nour Segsent From To of Lanes;Direction: Volume: Capacity;Excess C.1 V/C :LOS 1 2L FN NB 3522 a I 195 N.M. 27 Ave. bl FM EB 3412 e 3L FM MB 5477 a e; N.N. 27 Ave. LeJeune Rd. n FN EB 4074 a 3L FM MB 6403 a _ MacArthur Csvy. Alton Rd. Biscayne Blvd. 3L FN EB 2570 + y' 3L FM NO 2077 t Biscayne Blvd. N.E. 62 St. N.E. 36 St. 2L NB 2353 1360 -993 1.73 F _i 2L SB 1604 1360 -244 1.16 F N.E. 36 St. 1395 2L NB 2309 1360 -949 1.70 F =� 2L SB 1377 1360 -17 1.01 F M.E. 1 Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 3t. NB 2466 1920 -546 1.26 F OL SB 0 0 0 NA NA —_ Miassi Ave. N. 36 St. N. 17 St. 2L NB 561 1360 799 0.41 A 2L SB 452 1360 908 0.33 A N.M. 1 Ave. N.M. 20 St. Flagler St. 1L NB 120 625 505 0.19 A 1L SB 68 625 557 0.11 A M.M. 2 Ave. M.M. 20 St. Flagler St. 1L NB 499 625 126 0.00 C A' 1L SB 108 625 517 0.17 A 1 95 M.Y. 79 St. SR 112 5L FV NB 10469 a 5L FM SB 6030 a SR 112 SR 03611 395 51. FM U 6319 a i 51. FV SB 6212 a - a Level of Service is a feactios of systes opentioas ad axtweal iaflusaces. -1 Aw 11s31st7 DOWNTOWN MIAMI DR[ Table 11.5: FUTWE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETMORK — Arei: Cc Scenario: AM _.____ -- -------- ---------- -- Number ------- ----- ------ ----- ---- Peak -Hour-------__-------� --_--------- ---- i Segment From : To : of Lanes:Direction: Volume :Capacity:EKcess C.: V/C :LOS t Port Bridge Port of Miami Biscayne Blvd. 3LD EB 2650 2280 -370 1.16 F 3LD MB 935 2280 1345 0.41 A N. 6 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L MB 380 1170 190 0.32 A N. 5 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 3L E8 1259 1920 662 0.66 B OL Ii8 0 0 0 3 NA a N. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 OL EB O 0 0 NA NA 2L MB 316 1170 854 0.27 A Flagler St. Biscayne Blvd. M. 2 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L MB 388 1170 782 0.33 A M. 2 Ave. M. 27 Ave. IL EB ZL MB S. I St. Biscayne Blvd. S.M. 2 Ave. 3L EB 1260 1920 660 0.66 B OL MB 0 0 0 NA NA — S.M. 2 Ave. S.M. 27 Ave. 3L EB 1302 2180 678 0.60 A OL M/ 0 0 0 NA NA Ilscayee Ilvd. I 395 Port Blvd. 31.0 N8 1319 2260 961 0.56 A 31.1 SB 2141 2280 139 0.94 E Port Blvd. S.E. 2 St. 4LD NB 1019 2720 1901 0.35 A 3LD SB 1730 2280 550 0.76 C M.E. 2 Ave. 1 395 Flagler St. OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L SB 2680 1920 -960 1.50 F IIIui Ave. N. 17 St. Flagler St. OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA _ 31. 9 561 1920 1359 0.29 A 1. 2 Ave. Flgler St. S.M. 7/8 St. IL NB 377 623 248 0.60 A 1L SB 641 62S -16 1.03 F 1 95 SR Wit 395 S.M. B St. SLFM a wV SB DOWTOMN NIANI DR[ Table 11.5t FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETIIORK —' Areat CID Sceaariot PM ---------------•--i----- --- -----i------•------- INOW ._-.__-- 1 1--------Peak•Nonr---•------_-----i I Be�ettt 1 Froe 1 To 1 of LaneslPirntim-1 Volvo#ICaoacitv',Erc..a r.! vlr ti11C i Pert Bridle Part of Miasi Biscayne Blvd. 3LD EB 1200 2280 1080 0.53 A 3LD MB 2540 2280 -260 1.11 F N. 4 It. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 OL EB 0 0 0 MA NA 2L MI 744 1170 426 0.44 1 N. 5 It. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 3l ED 1062 1920 E56 0.55 A OL MI 0 0 0 NA NA N. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. 195 OL ED 0 0 0 NA NA 2L NI 545 1170 625 0.47 A Flaeler St. licravnr ANA. N. 2 Ave. OL ED 0 0 0 MA NA 2L MB 653 1170 517 0.56 A Y. 2 Ave. M. 27 Ave. 1L ED 206 765 579 0.26 A 2L MB 1293 1170 -123 1.10 F S. ! It. Iimyse Blvd. S.M. 2 Ave. 3l ED 936 1920 964 0.49 A OL MI 0 0 0 NA NA S.Y. 2 Ave. S.M. 27 Ave. 3l ED 756 2160 1424 0.35 A OL IA 0 0 0 MA NA Biauytle Blvd. 1 3" Port Blvd. XI a 2349 2280 -69 1.03 F 3LD SI 1223 2280 1057 0.54 A Port Blvd. S.E. 2 St. 4LO NB 1639 2920 1061 0.63 1 3LD SB 1477 2290 803 0.65 8 N.E. 2 Ave. 1 395 Haller St. OL III 0 0 0 NA NA 3L SB 1075 1920 645 0.56 A Ni"i A". N. 17 St. Haller St. OL MB 0 0 0 MA NA 3L SB 265 IM 1615 0.15 A N. 2 Ave. Flaller St. S.M. 7/B St. IL NB 514 625 31 0.95 E IL SB 467 in 151 0.75 C i 15 BB Bull 393 S.M. 1 St. ul MB 6121 s XF 1 SO 5414 e �l �, 30•seP-86 IOsOSsS2 DOWNT01N1 MIAMI DRI —1 Table 11.5: FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK • Drea; 9R!C1'�LL :j Scenarios All .— —; fSpeeat ; Fros ; To ; of Lanes;Direction; Voluse;Capacity;EKcess C-l-- V/C-!LOS-N-•i ���_��.-------•----..... S. 7 St. ------------------------------------------------------ Brickell Ave. 1 95 OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 3l MB 657 2160 1523 0.30 A -- 1 95 S.M. 27 Ave. OL E6 0 0 0 NA NA 3L Is 320 2180 1660 0.24 A S. 8 St. orickell Ave. 1 95 4L Eo 2174 3240 1066 0.67 B OL No 0 0 0 NA NA 1 95 S.W. 27 Ave. 4L EB 1857 3240 1363 0.57 A OL Is 0 0 0 NA NA Coral by erickell Ave. S.W. 15 Rd. X EB 2L WB S.N. 15 Rd. S.M. 12 Ave. 2LD Eo 2LO No S.M. 12 Ave. S.M. 27 Ave. 211 EB 2L0 Wo lrickell Ave. S.E. 2 St. S.E. 7 St. 3L No 1377 2180 803 0.43 8 2L So 1492 1360 -132 1.10 F S.E. 7 St. Rickeebacker 21.0 No 2LD So Wei Ave. Flagler St. S. 15 Rd. 31. No 539 2110 1641 0.25 A 3L So 417 2180 1763 0.19 A S. 15 Rd. Rickeabacker 2LD NO 210 So ' 195 S.M. 8 St. US i 2LFW No 2LFW 0 us 1 19S S.W. 17•Ave. 3u Mo 31.1 SI S.M. 17 Ave. Douglas Rd. 31.1 NI 31.0 Si gyetiore k. Rickeebacker S.M. 27 Ave. 2U Ilt 2U 51 AMP DOMIITOWN NIANI DRi Table 11.5: FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK Area: NICKELL Scenario: PM ----------»---------------------'--------------: ------------------:---------Peak-Hour----------------;--------; Segnent ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Froe To of Lanes:Dlrectlon: Volute:Capacity:EKcess C.: V/C :LOS 1 S. r St. AVE. 1 -S ^L 4' ' 3l M8 1656 2180 524 0.76 C 1 95 S.M. 17 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 3l MR 12B5 21BO 895 0.59 A S. 8 St. Brickell Ave. 1 95 4L EB 1044 3240 2196 0.32 A OL MB 0 0 0 NA NA 1 95 S.N. 27 Ave. 4L EB 1303 3240 1937 0.40 A OL MB 0 0 0 NA NA Coral War Brickell Ave. S.M. 15 Rd. 2L EB 372 1360 968 0.27 A 2L MB 1450 1360 -90 1.07 F S.W. 15 Rd. S.W. 12 Ave. 2LD EB 453 I800 1347 0.25 A 2LD MB 1339 1B00 461 0.74 C S.W. 12 Ave. S.W. 27 Ave. 2LD EB 1639 1800 161 0.91 E 2LD MR 1951 1800 -151 1.00 F Brickell Ave. S.E. 2 St. S.E. 7 St. 2L NB 1466 1360 -106 1.06 F 3L SB 1696 2180 494 0.77 C S.E. 7 St. Rickenbacker 2LD NB 695 t800 1105 0.39 A 2LO SB 2286 1800 -486 1.27 F Mani Ave. Flagler St. S. 15 Rd. 3L NB 814 2180 1366 0.37 A 3L SB 411 2160 1769 0.19 A S. 15 Rd. Rickenbacker 2LD NB 452 1800 1348 0.25 A 2LD SB 1596 1800 202 0.69 D I 95 S.Y. 6 St. us 1 2LFW NB 2717 + 2LFN S8 4259 t us 1 1 95 S.M. 17 Ave. 31.0 NB 3t43 2785 -358 1.13 F 3L0 SB 5138 2785 -2353 1.84 F - S.M. 17 Ave. Douglas Rd. 3LD NB 2979 2785 -194 1.07 F 3LD SB 4869 2785 -2084 1.75 F Baya we Dr. Rickenbacker S.M. 27 Ave. 2LD NB 718 1360 642 0.53 A 2LD SI 15" 13r0 -238 1.17 F a Lml of Service is a function of srstee operations m1 external influences, 01-1010 011A34 DQi WA NIANI MI Table 11.5111 ADJUSTED FUTURE TRAFFIC - C0lMITTEB NETUM Areal QMtI scenarios AN ---------- --------_-------------------------------tiu------------------:--_-------k --------------- s--------_ Sept I From I To I of Lone:Il`irectioni Val uou CaescitrlErcess C.I VJC ILQS = ------ ------------------------- -- ---- _---_ SR lull 395 ------------------------------------------------------------ Biscayne Blvd. 195 2L FM EB �l "Y v9 195 N.M. 27 Ave. SL FM EB SL FM MB N.M. 27 Ave. Leaeune Rd. 3L FM Is SL FM MM MacArthur Cs«y. Alton Rd. Biscayne RIvA. Ij FY FA 3L FM MB Biscayne Blvd. N.E. 62 St. N.E. 36 St. 2L NB 2L Be M.E. 36 St. 1 395 2L NB 2L SB N.E. l Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flaoler St. 3L NB 1106 1920 814 0.56 A OL so 0 0 0 NA NA Nisei Ave. N. 36 St. N. 17 St. 2L NB 2L SB N.M. 1 Am M.Y. 70 P. Flaelor P. if NB IL so JM. 2 Ave. N.M. 20 St. Flagler St. IL a ol-�e�-eo at:at:IB OOMNTOMM NIANI "I Table 11.54: ADJUSTED FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED METMORK Areal Owl . Scenario, M'R w----- --- ----------- --------------, Nueber--7 --------- ;---------Peak-Hour-----� : _--- Segeent ; Froe To of Lants;0irection, Voluee,Cap uity,Ucess C.1 VIC MOS ! SR 83b11 395 Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 7L FN EF -----------����--------._��__��_ 3059 s 2L FM NB 3522 e 1 95 N.M, 27 Ave. 31. FM EB 3412 • n FY NB 5477 e N.Y. 27 Ave. LeJeune Rd. SL FM EB 4074 • ' 3L FM NO b403 e NuArtAur Cswy. Alton Rd. Biscaynt Blvd. u FM EB 2570 t 3L FN YB 2077 • Biscayne Blvd. M.E. 62 St. N.E. 36 St. 2L NB 2353 1360 -993 1.73 F 2L SB 1604 1360 -244 1.16 F N.E. 36 St. 1 395 2L NB 2309 1360 -949 1.70 F 2L S8 1377 1360 .17 L Oi F N.E. 1 Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. 3L NB 2466 1920 -546 1.28 F OL SB 0 0 0 NA NA Miaei Ave. M. 36 St. N. 17 St. 2L NB 561 1360 799 0.41 A 2L SB 452 1360 906 0.33 A N.M. I Ave. N.M. 20 St. Flagler St. IL MB 120 625 505 0.19 A 1L SB 60 625 557 0.11 A M.M. 2 Are. M.M. 20 St. Flagler St. IL NB 499 625 126 0.80 C 1L $B 108 625 317 0.17 A 145 N.M. 79 St. SR 112 5L FM NO 10469 a 5L FM SB 6030 ; SO 112 SR 93611 395 5L FM MB 6319 e 5L FV SD 6212 e �- 30-Sep-B6 • 11s31:17 1-4 DOWNTOWN MIANI DRI -- Table 11.54s ADJUSTED FUTURE TRAFFIC - CDlNIITTED NETNDRK Arai: ..:J - Scenario: AM s' Segment From To ; of Lanes:Direction: Vol uselCapacitylExcess C.1 VIC ILOS 1 Port Bridge Port of Miami Biscayne Blvd. 3LD EB 2650 2280 -370 1.16 F 3LD MB 935 2280 1345 0.41 A N. 6 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 OL ED 0 0 0 NA NA �; 2L MB 380 1170 79O 0.32 A N. 5 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 3L EB 1250 1920 662 0.66 8 OL MB 0 0 0 NA NA — N. l St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L MB 316 1110 854 0.21 A Flagler St. Biscayne Blvd. M. 2 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA ZL MB 388 1170 702 0.33 A M. 2 Ave. M. 21 Ave. it EB 2L MB S. l St. Biscayne Blvd. S.M. 2 Ave. 3L EB 1260 1920 660 0.66 B OL MB 0 0 0 NA NA S.N. 2 Ave. S.M. 27 Ave. 3L EB 1302 2160 818 0.60 A OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA Biscayne Blvd. 1 3" Port Blvd. 3LD NB 1319 2280 961 0.58 A 3LD SB 2141 2280 139 0.94 E i Port Blvd. S.E. 2 St. 4LD NB 1019 2920 1901 0.35 A XG SB 1730 2280 550 0.76 C M.E. 2 Ave. 1395 Flaller St. OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA 31. SB 2660 1920 -960 1.50 F Nimai Ave. N. 17 St. Flaller St. OL Na 0 0 0 NA NA 3L SB 561 1920 1354 0.29 A M. 2 Ave. Flaller St. S.M. 11® St. 1L NB 577 625 48 0.?2 E IL SB NI 625 -16 1.03 F 1 95 a B3611 3" S.M. B St. 3LFM Re RR SB j �i-iMw-11 �3 DOWNTOWN MIAMI III Table 11.5A: ADJUSTED FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETNOW Area: CBB • 5ttnario: PM ..-------- — ------- ------`--------------;------------Ptak-Haur----------- ----- 1 1 —: - ieeeeet 1 Froe 1 To i o4 LanesiDirection• Voluet.'Caoscitv•Excess C.1 -- V/C iLOS ------- --------- 1 ............ Port Bridle ------------ Port of Miasi ------------------------------------------------------------- Biscayne Blvd. RD EB 1200 2200 1090 0.53 A SLD MB 2540 2260 -260 1.11 F N• . It. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 OL E8 0 0 0 NA MA 2L MB 744 1170 426 0.64 B N. S St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 Sl EB 1062 1920 B58 0.55 A OL MB 0 0 0 NA NA N. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 OL EB 0 0 0 MA NA 2L MB 545 1170 625 0.47 A Flaller St. Biscayne Blvd. M. 2 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 MAI MA 2l MB 653 1170 517 0.56 A M. 2 Are. M. 27 Ave. 1l El 206 765 579 0.26 A — 2L MB 1293 1170 -123 1.10 F S. 1 It. Biscayne Blvd. S.M. 2 Ave. 3l El 936 1920 964 0.49 A OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA S.M. 2 Ave. S.M. 27 Ave. 3l EB 756 2180 1424 0.35 A OL MB 0 0 0 MA NA Biecav" Blvd. T to Port Blvd. 3LB NB 2349 2280 -69 1.03 F 31.1 SB 1223 2280 1057 0.54 A Port Blvd. S.E. 2 St. 4LD NS 1639 2920 1081 0.63 B RD S8 1477 2280 803 0.65 B N.E. 2 Ave. 1 395 Haller St. OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA SL St 1075 1920 845 0.56 A Niami Ave. N. 17 St. Flaller St. OL N8 0 0 0 NA NA A SB 285 1920 1633 0.15 A ' M. 2 Ave. Flagler St. S.M. 7/8 St. IL NI 594 625 31 0." E if. SB 767 62S -142 1.23 F 1 n BB lull 3" S.M. B St. 31.fM w e SLFY 1sa e . ' e Level of Service is a frectiee of systee iWatieee and external iflaecee. :j 10s03s3Z DOWNTOWN MIAMI DRI Table 11.5A: ADJUSTED FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETWORK Area: L: — Scenario: AM »'- --- -- - ------------ -- --- ------------- lkiaber---------Peak-Hour----------------5 -----•-------------- ---------- Sgeent Froa : To of Lanes Direction'. -------------------------------------------------------- Voluee:Capacity:Excess C.: VIC ',LDS --- N»N------ ------ -- S. 7 St. ---------------------------------- Brickell Ave. 1 95 OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L MB 657 2180 I523 0.30 A 1 95 S.M. 27 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 KA NA 3L M8 52* 2180 1660 0.24 A !i Brickell Ave. 195 4L EB 1174 3140 1066 0.67 B OL MB 0 0 0 NA NA — 10 _+ 1 95 S.M. 27 Ave. 4L EB 1857 3240 1383 0.57 A OL MB 0 0 0 NA NA Coral lay Brickell Ave. S.M. 15 Rd. 2L EB 1L MB - S.M. 15 Rd. S.M. 12 Ave. 2LD EB 2LD MB S.Y. 12 Ave. S.M. 27 Ave. 2LD EB 2LD MB Brickell Ave. S.E. 2 St. S.E. 7 St. 3L NB 1177 2190 1003 0.54 A 2L SB 1492 1360 -132 1.10 F S.E. 7 St. Rickenbacker 2LD NB 2LD SB Rini Ave. Flagler St. S. 15 Rd. 3L NB S39 2190 1641 0.25 A 3L SB 417 2190 1763 0.19 A S. 15 Rd. Rickenbacker 2LD NB 2LD so i n S.Y. 8 St. US 1 2LFM N8 2LFM SB US 1 145 S.'M. 17 Ave. 3LO N8 uD so S.Y. 17 Ave. Douglas Rd. 3LD NB 3L0 Si 9ayshore or. Ricktobacker S.M. 27 Ave. 21.0 NI 2LD S9 8fs-84� 0ls3si� . i DOYMTOW MIAMI 091 Table 11.5A: ADJUSTED FUTURE TRAFFIC - COMMITTED NETMORK Areas NICKELL Scenario: pM ----------------- ------------ -�- -; ------------- --- ----- ; MuOber --------- --------- ; ;.-___•_--.peak- ----------------- ------ Hour ---..�..__�_'T Segeent ; Froa ; Tc ; of Lanes;Difection; Voluee;Cipacity;Excess C.; V!C ;LOS S. T ::. I ;5 GL E_ a c na X MB 1656 2180 524 0.76 C I 95 S.M. 27 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 NA MA 3L MB 1285 21BO 8" 0.59 A S. 8 St. Brickell Ave. 195 4L EB 1044 3240 2196 0.32 A OL MB 0 0 0 NA NA 195 S.M."27 Ave. 4L El 1303 3240 1937 0.40 A OL MB 0 0 0 NA MA Coral May Brickell Ave. S.M. 15 Rd. 2L EB 372 1360 989 0.27 A =j 2L MB 1450 1360 -90 1.07 F S.M. 15 Rd. S.M. 12 Ave. 2LD E8 453 1800 1347 0.75 A —_ 2LD MB 1339 1600 461 0.74 C S.Y. 12 Ave. S.M. 27 Ave. 2LD EB 1639 1800 161 0.91 E MEM 2LD YB 1951 1800 -151 1.08 F Brickell Ave. S.E. 2 St. S.E. 7 St. 2L NB t466 1360 -106 1.09 F 3L SB 1386 2180 774 0.64 8 S.E. 7 St. Rickenbacker 2LD N8 695 1800 1105 0.39 A - _ 2LD SB 1986 1600 -186 1.10 F Miaei Ave. Flagler St. S. 15 Rd. SL NB 614 2180 1366 0.37 A 3L SB 411 2180 1769 0.19 A S. 15 Rd. Rickenbacker 2LD No 452 1800 1348 0.25 A 21.0 SB 1548 1800 202 0.89 B 195 S.M. 8 St. us 1 2LFM NO 2717 + 2LFM SI 4559 • us t 19S S.M. 17 Ave. SU NB 3143 2785 -358 1.13 F RD SB 5138 2785 -2353 1.84 F S.M. 17 Ave. Douglas Rd. 3LD NB 2979 2785 -194 1.07 F 31,0 SB 4669 2185 -2084 1.75 F Bayebore Or. Rickenbacker S.M. 27 Ave. 21.0 MB 718 1360 642 0.53 A 21.1 so 1598 1360 -238 1.17 F TABLE 11.6 { TOTAL TRAFFIC PEAK -HOUR COMMITTED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS NETWMT_ Critical Time Level of Service Percent Saturation Excess Intersection li ayne'-boulevard/ Period Existing Projected EP-s-t-jr-m- g- Projecte Ca_ pacity N.E. 19th Street PM B C 59 73 443 N.E. 20th Street PM A A 38 43 978 N. Miami Avenue/ N. 20th Street PM A A 31 29 1,224 N. Miami Avenue/ PM A A 13 15 1,534 N. 17th Street Biscayne Boulevard/ N.E. 15th Street PM C E 76 90 163 _ N. Miami Avenue/ PM A A 21 22 11,344 N. 15th Street z N.W. 1st Avenue/ PM A A 19 18 1,474 N.W. 14th Street 'N.E. =_ 1st Avenue/ PM E F 94 101 -26 I-395 (North Ramp) AM A A 36 36 1,141 N.E. 1st Avenue/ PM C D 75 78 398 I-395 (South Ramp) AN A A 31 32 1,215 N.E. 2nd Avenue/ PM A A 33 34 19186 I-395 (North Ramp) AM A A 50 53 $45 N.E. 2nd Avenue/ PM A A 31 31 1,242 I-395 (South Ramp) AM B C 56 76 441 Biscayne Boulevard/ PM A 6 51 65 637 I-395 Biscayne Boulevard/ PM A A 41 55 774 N.E 12th Street N.E. 1st Avenue/ PM A D 43 83 298 -_ N.E. 6th Street A it _ N.W. 3rd Avenue/ PM A A 37 41 1,059 = N.W..6th Street AN A A 11 15. 1,532 0-I.W. 3rd Court/ PM A A 16 37 1,130 AM em N.W. 6th Street AN A A 22 34 19189 SG-849 TABLE 11.6 Continued�i TOTAL TRAFFIC- fATERS&ION ANALYSIS COMMITTED NETWORK Critical Time Level of S6rvice Percent Saturation Excess Intersection Period `FFT— xistin ""•— ro ecte4Existingro ec a Capacity . n venue/ � --�87— N.E. 5th Street N.E.-Ist Avenue/ PM A A 34 45 9AS N.E. 5' -1 Street N. Miami Avenue/ PM A A 24 23 19393 N. 5th Street K N.W. 2nd Avenue/ PM D D 83 79 347 N.W. 3rd Street Biscayne Boulevard/ PM A A 41 47 920 N.E. 1st Street N. Miami Avenue/ PM A A 28 30 19264 N. 1st Street N.W. 2nd Avenue/ PM A A 47 50 900 N.W. 1st Street N.W. 2nd Avenue/ PM B C 61 71 475 Flagler Street S.E. 1st Avenue/ PM A A 27 32 19222 S.E. 1st Street S.W. 2nd Avenue/ PM A A 45 54 784 - S.W. 1st Street S.E. 2nd Avenue/ PM C C 74 75 $03 — S.E. 2nd Street . S. Miami Avenue/ PM B C 56 74 450 — S. 2nd Street Brickell Avenue/ PM A C 50 76 392 S.E. 7th Street AM A A 35 50 818 - S. Miami Avenue/ PM A A 25 52 858 S. 7th Street AM A A 14 28 19289 S.W. 2nd Avenue/ PM A B. 30 62 686 S. 7th Street AM A A 21 37 11,141 zaq S.W. 3rd Avenue/ PM A A 21 34 19187 S.W. 7th Street AM A A 9 16 10518 ;31_= S.W. 4th Avenue/ PM B C 56 76 405 S.W. 7th Street AM A B 36 56 75? - - ------ IL ----- - TABLE 11.6 Continued TOTAL TRAFFIC ION ANALYSIS Critical Time Level of Service Percent Saturation Excess Intersection Period ,Existing Projecte x sting ProjecteR Capacity Brickell Avenue/ PM A D 53 80 324 S.E. 8th Street AM A D 52 85 251 S. `; �..-:i , , _:�:�/ P'". A A 2� 45 962 S..8th Street AM A C 30 65 631 S.W. 3rd Avenue/ PM A B 14 57 744 S.W. 8th Street AM A C 22 67 599 S.W. 4th Avenue/ PM A 6 45 58 758 S.W. 8th Street AM B C 51 67 596 Brickell Avenue/ PM C D 67 82 305 S.W. 13th Street S.W. 3rd Avenue/S.W. 15th Road/S.W. 13th Street PM A A 52 52 873 Brickell Avenue/ PM C D 73 89 197 S.E. 15th Road *S. Miami Avenue/ PM A A 26 54 780 S. 15th Road D. ADDITIONAL APPROVABLE DEVELOPMENT 1) PROVIDE A MAP OF THE TRAFFIC IMPACT AREA FOR EACH PHASE (J-4 series) SHOWING PROJECTED AVAILABLE EXCESS CAPACITY. FOR PHASE 1: EXCESS CAPACITY SHOULD BE BASED ON A COMBINATION OF PROJECTED VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS FOR INTERSECTIONS_ AS AWHOLE, AS A ME_A_SURF OF INTZ' '-,CT l,.ii (;tt 1Ci i 1 ! ni�J ii'0�t.., G 5i r_-r'ED I li'Z' tii:l_AYS run I�IICrtaCCl lt/i15 AS A WHOLE* AS A F�EASURE OF LEVEL OF SERVICE [EXCEPT FOR EXPRESSWAYS AND ARTERIALS WHERE TRAFFIC FLOW IS NOT INTERRUPTED BY SIGNALS AND DRIVEWAYS, WHERE EXCESS CAPACITY SHOULD BE BASED ON PROJECTED EXCESS LOS "D" (LOS "E" IN DOWNTOWNS) LINK CAPACITY]. FOR ALL OTHER PHASES, EXCESS CAPACITY SHOULD BE BASED ON PROJECTED EXCESS 1.05 "D" (LOS "E" IN DOWNTOWNS) LINK CAPACITY. ALTHOUGH THE DATA MAY BE AGGREGATED GEOGRAPHICALLY FOR EASE OF PRESENTATION, IT MUST ALSO BE PRESENTED FOR EACH CRITICAL INTERSECTION AND LINK. The Map J-4 series identifying excess capacity of roadway links and intersections (Phase I only) has been provided. Map J-4.1A shows excess link capacity for Phase I and Map J-4.1B shows excess intersections capacity for Phase I. Maps J-4.2 and J-4.3 show excess link capacity for Phases II and III respectively. The agreement between Council staff and the applicant to use the Circular 212 (Critical Movement Analysis) methodology, for detailed intersection capacity analysis, precludes using volume to capacity ratios and average stopped delay in calculating excess capacity. However, excess capacity, at critical intersections, can be calculated from the CMA worksheets. Excess capacity, using this methodology, is expressed in terms of the additional number of Critical Movements that can travel thru an intersection at Level of Service "E". A sample calculation of excess Critical Movements is shown below. i Calculation of Excess Intersection Capacity Intersection.Type: Two one-way streets. Signal Phasing: Two Phase Sum of Critical Volumes 0 LOS "E" 1,800 Sum of Critical Volumes from analysis = 1 450 Excess Capacity = �350 Excess Capacity shown on the Map.J-4 series is the capacity available prior to traffic assignment for allowable development for that phase. 2. IDENTIFY, BY COMPLETING TABLE 11.1, THE AMOUNT OF ADDITIONAL DEVELOP- - NENT, USING A LAND USE CLASSIFICATION •SYSTEM ACCEPTABLE TO COUNCIL STAFF, THAT COULD BE PERMITTED WITHOUT FALLING BELOW THE VOLU14E TO CAPACITY RATIO AND LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA SPECIFIED. The peak -hour based Level of Service for Downtowns, as specified in the DRI Questionnaire. is LOS "E". However. the Questionnaire also nws KIL must MAP J-4.IA EXCM CAPACM-fKNVMAV L"(S C" p"ASE I *40�M !)OWNTololm, a T iw rater .... ► MOOD , .. I DOWNTOWN MASTERPLAN DEVEWMENT OF FEGIONAL IMPACT `* -iii!v i Nor Aw air - . t � ��!r►�: 1. F, no TAW NOW N'M'1 Oki 'Alai \L11 R i uAP J-4.2A EXCESS CAPACITV-ROADWAV LM8 PHAW joOMDOMOCT OF ii SAL IMPACT 1 11-48 �- I It 22-0 1 ipmNo's INS .�■ ISM - �I .wan �i � -. .r..r ai- aMw.� -rM.. ties i1.�r �s �.s��wu �r� _ +•r ai.Ar � �r • J- I-N AY LMS VW p Y i r � .sr -- as � r.! � • ry v '_ . 4 p � �DEVEWWWENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Ott i 1 50 L84s % 'N' RNA Now 441 Wm lftm W-1 A** ism;" FW7 .af 40,p -.kli;a 10 -:d 7. 14A m cli V I m I T I MAP J-4.3A W(CM CAPACITI-4WADWAY LOKS CUMA"s PHAW 01 i�`m EA MAP J-4-3A EXCESS CAPAW V—ROADWAY UNKS (AM) PHASE IN &6. al for' to /fol, fL.— J'A A A is r)EvELopmtNT OF REGIONAL IMPACT W&A WN rw •t !t ' EXCESSCAPY Af LIMS OW P"AW ml 00 11- 5 4 86-`►84 S If c El below LOS "E". No more than ZO percent of roadway links and inter- sections can be below LOS "E". It is important to understand that LOS "E", as used in this document, represents capacity operating conditions of the roadway link or intersection being analyzed. Table 11-7 idcntifipc ern nr•._ .a n,�� _ten• _� _�_ _ ,_..i r earn of the GownEown Miami sub -areas by phase. The land uses and development intensities identified on this table are in addition to presently permitted development. • 3. IF, FOR ANY PHASE, THE APPLICANT WISHES MORE DEVELOPMENT BY LAND USE (TABLE 11.7) RECOMMENDED THE NETWORK/INTERSECTION/ SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS AND/OR REGULATORY CHANGES THAT WOULD IMPROVE PROJECTED LEVELS OF SERVICE AND VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS TO ACCEPTABLE STANDARDS. For Phase I, only the roadway improvements identified as being committed have been included. Traffic projections contained in this report are based on the assumption that the Metromover extensions to Omni and Brickell will be in -place prior to Phase I buildout. This assumption is consistent with current County policy and transportation funding programs. In fact, a special assessment taxing district has been created and approved in both of these subareas to provide a local funding source. In addition, a number of recently approved Developments of Regional Impact in the Brickell sub -area are required, by Development Order, to provide funding ibr the Metromover extension. 4. COMPLETE TABLE 11.8: RECOMMENDED V/INTERSECTION IMMVEMENTS TAME 11.8: RECOMMENM NW&AWINTERSECTION IMMi(EWJM COST /iMSE LOCATION 61020V T i No improvements required. 11-56 ti� El �11 'FABLE 11.7 PRO'OQ01 XVQAPNW MUM FOR DOWNTOWN MIM1I DRI 4014" w OMI ' l Mu M�IrM 1 Phase II Phase III t I�000.000 ".ft. 1,700,000 sq.ft. 2,800,000 sq.ft. #wtsn mt Office 1W,000 "at. 150.000 sq.ft. 150,000 sq.ft. bull % tice 00.= ".ft. 100,000 sq.ft. 200.000 sq.ft. WWI 0 ROOM 500 Rooms 500 RofJ.ns NM! tilt R04 Volts 800 Units 1,200 Uniis COMMt1M Ili0.000 ".ft. 250,000 sq.ft. 250,000 sq.ft. MM140410/tMrstrial l$M'= 64.ft. 1,000,000 sq.ft. 2.000,000 sil. ft. to OWCO 37I.000 ".ft. 657.500 sq.ft. 1,003,500 sq.ft. omit/P:O!"Ce 103.= ".ft. 147.900 sq.ft. 194.100 sq.ft. ' MNe1 = ROOM 1100 Rooms 1100 Ro,as Mod"41 +1000 umu 6500 Units 9000 Un i is Calm"IM M'000 244t. 600.000 sq.ft. 600,000 sq.ft. Oi+6e 3,=,= ".ft. 4.600.000 sq.ft. 5,800,000 sq.ft. Ofs144'N"t office ISO.000 ".ft. 400,000 sq. ft. 600,000 sq, ft. Reul1/snrice no.000 ".ft. 900,000 sq.ft. 1.150,000 sq.ft. MMIu1 M Kim 660 Rooms 1,750 Ro..,ns b ll ai 10p00halts 1800 Units 2,820 Units es"W"40 M.MIA/ "Oft« 250,000 sq.ft. 500,000 sq.ft. MM M410 1MOstrial 901000 ".ft. 50.000 sq.ft. 100,000 sq.ft. fMt1101" t M.000 ".ft. 300.000 sq.ft. 600,000 sq.ft. At tim/Recreati00 3„400 treats 5,000 Seats 10,000 Seats R+ All 39000000 10.ft. 4,500,000 sq.ft. 5,800.000 sq.ft. I rks 30:= lO.ft.. 450,000 sq.ft. 600,000 sq.ft. M ROOsis 350 Rooms 350 Ro, as 1 Rom vm a 3,500 Units 5.000 Units 5) SHOW EXISTING GEOMETRICS AND PROVIDE A CONCEPTUAL DESIGN AND COST ESTIMATE, INCLUDING ANY NECESSARY RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION, FOR EACH IMPROVEMENT, REGULATORY CHANGE (IF APPLICABLE), OR MODIFICATION REQUIRED. 6) NUMERICALLY DOCUMENT THE LEVEL .OF SERVICE EFFECT OF ALL PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND ALL REGULATORY OR SYSTEM CHANGES. FOR EACH PROPOSED REGULATORY CHANGE, DESCRIBE A RESOLUTION/ORDINANCE THAT WOULD ACCOMPLISH THE CHANGE. COMPLETE TABLES 11.9 AND 11.10, AND PROVIDE IN AN APPENDIX INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSES (INCLUDE EACH INTERSECTION SHOWN IN THE RESPONSE TO C5) ILLUSTRATING THE LEVEL OF SERVICE AND VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIO THAT WOULD RESULT FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS AND REGULATORY CHANGES PROPOSED. Tables 11.9 and 11.10 have been provided as requested. Intersection Capacity Analysis is contained in the Appendix. Excess capacity on Table 11.10 is available capacity at the end of Phase I development. Only three intersections, are projected to operate below LOS "E" at the end of Phase I development. This is well below the 20 percent allowed by the LOS criteria established for purposes of this report. Intersections projected to operate below !.OS "E" are: 1 Biscayne Boulevard/N.E. 15th Street PM) -- 2 N.E. 1st Avenue/I-3995 North R&W (PH) 3 Brick.ell Avenue/S.E. 15th Road (PH) )f SPECIFY NOW SUFFICIENT REVENUE TO COVER THE COSTS OF CONST+NBCI OO NECESSARY TitANSP'ORTATION INFRASTMICTURE, INCLUDDS ANY i ALTERNATIVES IDENTMED, WILL BE PNEVID€D IN A TIMELY IMNNEl. _= •� TO EWTE AN AWNIT OF ADDITIONAL APPROVABLE DEVELOPMENT TO THE OOLLM CM OF SYSTN CNAAKES PRI ( SEE TAKE 11.8 AM[) * ITENICfl9P Y SAT STEPS 91 TNWM OI WUL A FLUME SET OF OLO "SAND 268MURNY OR SYM CIVAM IS tWfftFM TOT 41 INK LM OF RMCE CIRITUIA SPKIFIEDIN R MK T& OE WT. FNEST ITERATtON. WIM TWE MONT OF AMUMLE If VM Oil TNE 0ONNTnO AWARAI NO EXIST NE =- WIN FWIK A FISPONSE TO 61 AID 02 6KY. FU 101 FM !IT�ENATTON, iiN X TNE AIEUNT OR AOOITIONAl APF�liNEAiLE OE1fEiA I I3 Stan [•*�"r1C QfM#� !�T M!t Iw.,a..y wr..a„ ..•w w��.« ... ..... .... f � 0t-iadn-90 MUM F. MUNTOYN N1AN1 MI Table 11.9s FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOMIOW NETYORII Areas 01M1 Scenarios PHASE ONE AN iR I" I Nuaber ----- ----vet-Nax----- --.............. ----! 6"mt 1 Froa 1 To l of Lanes1Directi0nl YoluoelCaoacitlrlExcets C.l V/C LOS ! --------------------------------------- ----------- ----------------- ---------- ------------ ------------ ------- ---- i1 83611 395 Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 2L FN EB .% L % }". 1 95 N.Y. 27 Ave. 3L FY EB ;- X FN NB N.N. 27 Ave. Wpm Rd. A FY EB St FY NB NuArthar Covy. Alton Rd. Biscayne Blvd. X FY EB 3L FN MB Biscayne Blvd. N.E. 62 St. N.E. 36 St. X NB . = n se N.E. 36 St. 1 395 2L NB ?I SA = N.E. l Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flaoler St. x NB 1193 1920 lit 6.1,7 A OL so 0 0 a NA NA Masi Ave. N. 36 St. N. 17 St. 2L NB 2L so N.Y. t Ave. N.Y. 20 St. Flagler St. !L NB IL SB _— N.Y. 2 Ave. N.Y. 20 St. Flaoler St. IL NB IL so , N.N. 79 St. St 112 7l FN M 9 it RI1 ' -- 111112 a M111 "S I FIN • on • 01.10-i0 02101118 OOMITDNN MIAMI DRI Title 11.9: FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECMMI KI NETMO111 Area: OMN1 Scenario: PHASE ONE PM ------------- ---------------- ---------------- 1-Nuaber t ..»...».__._�- ------------ -I- -� Sgeent 1 Froe 1 To 1 of LaneslDirectionl Vol ueeMapacity'Eicess C.I. V/C LOS 1 SR E116/1 395 8iscavre Blvd. 7L ry E° 7741 + 2L P 4 .41 3689 + 1 95 N.N. 21 Ave. 3L FN EB 3570 e % Fit NB S858 e N.M. 27 Ave. LeJeune Rd. 3L FV EB 4204 a X FM WB 6744 e McArthur Csry. Alton Rd. Biscayne Blvd. 1L. FN EB 2681 a 3L FM KB 2145 a Biscayne Blvd. N.E. 62 St. N.E. 36 St, 2L N8 2578 1360 -1218 1." F 2L SB 1690 1360 -330 1.24 F N.E. 36 St. 1 395 2L N8 2611 1360 -1251 1.72 F 2L SB 1499 1360 -139 1.10 F M.E. t Ave. M.E. l7 St. Flagler St. 3L NB 2645 1920 -725 1.38 F OL SB 0 0 0 NA NA Mimi Ave. N. 36 St. N. 17 St. 2L NB 576 1360 782 0.42 A 2L S9 459 1360 901 0.34 A M.M. 1 Are. N.M. 20 St. Flagler St. IL NB 117 625 488 0.22 A IL SB 75 625 550 0.12 A N.M. 2 A". LL 20 St. Haller St. IL 0 SSAi Ai25 49 0.19 B IL a 1u m 4492 0.21 A 1 n N.M. 7y St. Sit 112 1 FM NO 11454 a i FM a Af= • •112 a91MIm IA • 101 • s A • ANOB • • IwM •/ Ab • welM� •0 • Alr ad 416wri 601k i w WSW-1r< ;h :Y�• 111.iii 17 ' `3 DDMNTOMN IIIANI DRI Table 11.9: FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOMMENDED NE 0001 • Aria; C£D Scenarios PHASE ONE AM ..-.-.-.����- --------------� web-- ------ 7--------- eak-Hoar----------- ---- ---1 -----•------- SeNesst From -------- ----- —--------------------- To of Lanes'. Directi on.' ------------ -- Voluee�CapacitylExcess C.S ---- ----»—_-----------------. V/C LQS 1 _- ----- Pert Bridge Port of Miami Biscayne Blvd. RD EB 26H 2280 -370 1.16 F RD MB 935 2280 1345 0.41 A _= N. 6 St. Biscayne Blvd. 195 OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L MB 439 1170 731 0.37 A = N. 3 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 SL EB 1342 1920 578 0.70 8 OL MB 0 0 0 NA NA -- N. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. I 95 OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L MB 355 1170 215 0.30 A Fla9ler St. Biscayne Blvd. M. 2 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA a MI 413 1170 687 0.41 A M. 2 Ave. M. 27 Ave. IL El S. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. S.M. 2 Ave. A D 13N IM 5S6 0.71 C OL M 0 0 0 NA M S.M. 2 Ave. S.M. 27 Ave. 1 D 1443 2110 735 UA 1 /ieca/r Mrs. 1 M Pert 1Nvl. 11 a 14" 22M » $A& 1 u M M3 2310 -1112 1.0 F Vwt Ord. S.E. 2 St. 42 r JIM 2M til`iis LN A w N 191111 20 2M L871 • OLL t && 1 M Flasw St. 4t a / 1 • a a 1 M 30111 210 _ LW F Mi 1 11 SS. . or M. M M 1 1 i a a 3L u do He an Iris A a ! r. naow 11. LL in M. a a IV do -u Law I li ! NMI = st.1t. 1 M. 106 • WIN a a 11-i1 f M M C is $140-10 02� 12t11 OOMITOMI 11 MI BRi Table IlA FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOINIEB NETVW Aram CK I1 1 Nuaber S {---------Petk-Floar---»---»--»----------1 Beeeeat I Fra I To 1 of limptInirowtinmt Yalit"{CasacitvlEecess C.1 V/C LOS 1 Pert Bri1,t Port of Masi Biscayne Blvd. 3l0 EB 1200 2280 IM 0.53 A RD NB 2340 2260 -260 1.11 F N. 6 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2l MB 944 1170 326 0.72 C N. S St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 SL EB IM 1920 622 0.57 A OL MB 0 0 0 MA NA N. 1 it. Biscayne Blvd. 195 OL EB 0 0 0 MA NA 2L MI SBO 1170 590 0.30 A Flaller St. Biscayne Blvd. M. 2 Ave. OL Ell 0 0 0 NA NA 2L MB 816 1170 294 0.75 C M. 2 Ave. M. 27 Ave. 1l EB 241 115 1 0.31 A 2l MB 1476 1170 -306 1.26 F Bietaytt Blvd. S.M. 2 Ave. SL EB 1096 1920 624 0.57 A OL a 0 0 0 NA NA S.M. 2 Art. S.M. 27 Ave. X a 117 2100 1363 0.37 A OL a o 0 0 NA r Mesale� rt/. I Part BTvl. u a 2711 2210 -at 1.19 F 3L1 a 1316 20 04 0.61 B Part KvC ii.E. 210. 41A a 2m 200 701 0.73 C S1.1 8 Ku M "I L71 C ILL ! 6& 1 31S iWer St. OL a 0 0 0 a a i • U31 It31 71U LIP • II�i w. L tt Ile. mia0w a. a a 0 0 0 a • SL a let M US LO i fkder IL 1s.Ol. 14 W . a Ml AS -W LO i si w • wN1 m " • K. aye r Am • an • SBA • • wd of ireIMalf it a OM10049 "mwwd m r OrBrNI111"m •, 30-S"-U 10:03:32 DOWNTOWN NIANI DRI 4 Table 11.9: FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECONIENOED NETMORK Area: °.CKILL ' Scenario: PHASE ONE AR ;u------------------- aber --�Pe�k-Noun- »»::" .:� --- -; »---•----------------------; Sept ; From To of Lines: Direction: Val use: CipuityWExcess C.: V/C LOS : S. 7 St.»»»»__~Brickell Ave. 195 OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA SL MB 778 21BO 1402 0.36 A 1 95 S.M. 27 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L MB 611 2160 1569 0.20 A S. 1 St. Brickell Ave. 195 4L EB 2540 3240 700 0.76 C OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA 1 95 S.M. 27 Ave. 4L EB 2079 3240 1161 0.64 B OL MB 0 0 0 NA NA Coral May Brickell Ave. S.M. 15 Rd. I EB 2L a S.Y. l5 Rd. S.M. 12 Ave. 2LD EB 2LD M1 S.M. 12 Ave. S.Y. 27 Ave. 2L9 0 2L0 MM 1ridkil AN. S.E. 2 St. S.E. 7 St. x a 124 210 IS LU i x III UIZ JIM -3n 1.24 F S.E. 7 St. itictembackw 212 AD u I" on. Rqiw Sk. L 15 ft. L a 84 m IN LV • L a its m INS LUG L M NE. hememler Ra i 30 w is Li S Si. INS 1 an a in M as t III Lf6 t1► 60. XB 1N LL 1160. " IL as a 12yebon or Rickeaieckw S.M. 27 Ave. 212 ■ 21t1 S1 ::. 11—i) 30-8"-A6 MUM DOYNTOYN HIM DRI Table 11.9: FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOMMENOED NETWORK Area: NICKELL Scenario: PHASE ONE PM ' ---_------ ------- -------------------y: Nusber--I--------- ---------- Peak-Hour���.:�:»---------1 Seleeet —_—»--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Froe : To at Lanes:Direction: Voluse:Capatity:Excess C.: V!C LOS S. 7 St. Brickell Ave. 1 95 OL EB 0 0 0 04 MA ri %a fi4v il.w w 0.17, u 1 95 S.M. 27 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L MR 1498 2160 682 0.69 B S. 8 St. Brickell Ave. 1 95 4L €6 1201 3240 2039 0.37 A OL MB 0 0 0 NA NA 1 95 S.M. 27 Ave. 4L EB 1398 3240 1042 0.43 A OL MB 0 0 0 MA NA Coral May Brickell Ave. S.M. 15 Rd. 2L EB 434 1360 921 0.32 A 2L MB 1574 1360 -214 1.16 F S.Y. 15 Rd. S.M. 12 Ave. 2LD EB 515 1B00 1205 0.29 A 2LD VB 1463 1800 337 0.61 D S.M. 12 Ave. S.M. 27 Ave. 2LD EB 1691 1B00 109 0.94 E 2LD MB 2039 1600 -739 1.13 F brickell Ave. S.E. 2 St. S.E. 7 St. 2L N8 1633 1360 -273 1.20 F 3L SB 1541 2180 639 0.71 C S.E. 7 St. Rickenbacker 2LD NB 903 1000 697 0.50 A 2LD SB 2281 1600 -481 1.27 F Itiui Ave. FIgler St. S. 15 Rd. X NB 1169 2160 1011 0.54 A X SB 620 2160 1560 0.28 A S. 15 Rd. Rickenbacker 2L1 N1 607 1600 1193 0.34 A 2LD 0 1"2 1800 -162 1.10 F 1 1s U. I St. US 1 21F1 111 2145 a X" a 4824 a • 1 1 4S 5.1. 17 Aa. RA a 34L5 2115 -4 0 1.24 F 2LI a 3731 2m -2% Los F LL 11 6m. Asuglas if. 22 4 3231 2115 -446 M& F 1I a SL3 zm -we Lis i au • eau iia .aee a-u IF 1i1�011! ;_.� OOIIITQiIN R1ANI ORI Tarp 11.9s FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOMMENDED NETVM Areas OINI Scenarios PARSE TWO AM c';ng --•--•-------- ----- —---------- - ---------------� ,. Nuaber I---------peak-Hour.»__._»»»._..._»»»I sq mt -.--»»»_-»---- I From I -------------------------- To ; of LaneilDirection! Val umelCapacitylEucesa C.I V/C LOS I SR Q3tt! 345 1 95 -------------------------------------- ?L rW -----------»-»»_».. r? 2L F0 Via 19S N.W. 21 Ave. X FM ED 21. FM WB N.M. 27 Ave. Wpm Ad. X FM €D 2L FM MI NaeArthw Cary. Aitoa Rd. 8iscavne Blvd. X FM EI X FM MI Iiatayae Ilvtl. M.E. 62 St. M.E. 36 St. 2L IN 2L SI _— N.F. U q+. I zoo 71 spa ZIGM 2L se M.E. 1 Ave. M.E. 17 St. Fligler St. X N/ 1231 1920 682 0.64 1 OL SB 0 0 0 NA NA _ MAW Ave. N. 36 St. N. 17 St. 2L N1 —� 2L so N.M. 1 Ave. N.M. 20 St. Flagler St. 1L NI 1L SI i A& M.M. 2 Ave. N.Y. 20 St. Flagler St. IL MI IL 61 04 f N16 11103150 WON N14111 BRl Table 11.9: FtiRK TRAFFIC - RECOROPEI NETVM Area: ONNI Scenario: PHASE TWO PM — ------------------------------------ -------------_--_Nueber _»peak-Hour-««----��»»::.».;� Seyeent Froe S To of Lann Mirection; Volum',CapacitylE«cess C.1 VIC LOS .------««-------- SR 83611 395 -------- ------------------------ Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 »---------------------- 2L FM EB 3365 -------------------- a 1 95 N.M. 27 Ave. A FM EB 3666 a 3L FM MB 6090 a N.M. 27 Ave. Lehune Rd. SL FM EB 4283 a 3L FM up 6952 . e Nackthar Cswy. Alton Rd. Biscayne Blvd. 3L FM EB 2754 a X FM MB 2199 s Biscayne Blvd. N.E. 62 St. N.E. 36 St. 2L NB 2709 1160 -1349 1." F 2L SB 1740 1360 -360 1.28 F M.E. 36 St. 1 395 2L NB 27" 1160 -1430 2.05 F 2L SB 1572 1360 -212 1.16 F N.E. t Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flaqler St. 3L 08 2735 1920 -615 1.42 F OL SB 0 0 0 NA NA Niati Ave. N. 36 St. N. 17 St. 2L N8 601 1360 759 0.44 A 2L S6 466 1360 692 0.34 A N.M. l Ave. N.M. 20 St. Flagler St. 1L NB 160 625 465 0.26 A IL SB 64 625 541 0.13 A N.M. 2 Ave. N.M. 20 St. Flagler St. 1L a 560 625 45 0.93 E IL SI 162 625 463 0.26 A t 4S N.M. 79 St. SR 112 51. FM 0 11441 a 3L FM U 6w a U 112 61 IWI 393 5L FM Nll 9502 • 3L F1 a 60 • 004BITOMM NIAMI DAI Table 11.1s FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECONNEMOED NETifORK Areas C11 • _..�.»..�------_---------»---1-__" ; Faber 1 ;--------- Peak -Hour ---���_.__��__..��I Seeae@t I Fro@ I To I of LanesiDirection; Vo1uw1 Caoacitv:Ezcess C.1 VIC LOS I fort Bridge Port of Mani Biscayne Blvd. 3LO EB 2650 2260 -370 1.16 F 3LO MB 935 2260 1345 0.41 A N. A St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 94 OL EB 0 0 0 MA MA 2L wB 497 1170 673 0.42 A - N. S It. Biscayat Blvd. 1 95 A EB 1391 1920 522 0.73 C OL MB 0 0 0 MA NA - N. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 OL EB 0 0 0 MA NA 2L MB 374 1170 796 0.32 A FlaBler St. Biscayne Blvd. M. 1 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA — 2L we 518 1170 6S1 0.44 A V. 2 Ave. N. 17 Ave. 1L EB 2L wB - S. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. S.M. 2 Ave. 3L ED 13" Im 525 0.73 C OL 0 0 0 0 NA NA S.Y. 2 Ave. S.M. 27 Ave. A Et 1572 2190 601 0.72 C OL a 0 0 0 NA w -_ i4ecaNe pw. 1 m Fort ilvd. 31.1 0 Im 2m 617 0.70 1 - 3L1 NU ZW -3U 1.16 F - Flirt ow. S•E. 2 St. 42 M 1241 2M 1679 0.43 A 11 >i1 21U 22M 114 0.92 E Mow St. K a 0 0 0 a w - 3L 0 Stu 1m -1231 1." F M1ari �. L u Blt.. 1F1a0Ier w. K a 0 0 tE M! • . ; = i, ! w "26 IM LX • L 2 M. fteew IL LL Im a. a r 1w in -0 B.0 i L w is in -0 LV Is u own m LL II 9L 311R1 • rw WIN 0 lllBo ¢{ i • A Ts _ M a 0111o�ZS DOMMTOINI MIAMI OR[ Table 11.9: FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOMMENDED NETNW Area CBO Scenario: PHASE TWO PM ---.�---�-------- ---------------------- :-Nueder------ 7--------�-7---------Peak-Hour------------------------; S"wt l Froa ; To 1 of Lanes�Oirection,' VoluselCepacity:Eccess C.1 V/C LOS 0 ^ ^ Efi 1"'^ 2:�� 1^?^, p.XT _ 31.0 MQ 2540 2280 -260 1.11 F N. 6 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L MB 913 1170 257 0.78 C N. 5 St. Biscayne 81vd, 1 95 31 EB 1153 IV20 .57 0.60 A OL MB 0 0 0 NA NA N. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L MB 603 1170 567 0.52 A Flagler it. Biscayne Blvd. M. 2 Aye. OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L MB 958 1170 212 0.82 0 M. 2 Aye. M. 27 Ave. 1L EB 257 785 528 0.33 A 2L M8 1566 1170 -416 1.36 F S. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. S.M. 2 Ave. 31 EB 1124 1920 796 0.59 A OL MB 0 0 0 NA NA S.M. 2 Ave. S.M. 27 Ave. 3L EB 872 2160 1308 0.40 A OL MB 0 0 0 NA NA Biscayne Blvd. 1 395 Port Blvd. 3LO NB 2905 2280 -625 1.27 F 3LD SB 1474 2280 606 0.65 B Port Blvd. S.E. 2 St. 4LO NB 2264 2920 656 0.78 C 31.8 St 1673 2280 605 0.73 C N.E. 2 Are. 1 m Flayler St. OL w 0 0 0 NA NA R Si 1205 1920 715 0.63 1 Masi AMe. N. 17 St. Flafler St. OL w 0 0 0 NA NA x a 30 1920 150 0.11 A L 2 Aw. Mow 1t. U. 718 St. IL a Nil 6n -tit 1.29 F a a 117 623 -362 l.! F 1 A • I WI M LL I ft. AM M me • 31011 r 9001 • • LN d of lama s• a fesctlaa of •ystes awstim and wtwwl iefl•amm il-i� 86 84S 014m-m NO 16 OWTOMN N1ANl HI . Toile 11.9: FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECONPOIOED lETWK Area: NICKELL keearie: PHASE TWO AN ' l t ! IMaber 1 I---------Pe+k-Honr-».»----•---.»-~.._...r �. 5e0flet I From r To ! of Lanesl0irsrfimi Yn1tis#1rMMritvlFtrNR r-I Y/C IPA I S. 7 it. erickell Are. 145 OL ED 0 0 0 NA NA X WS 551 21b0 1327 0.59 A 1 4S S.M. 27 Ave. OL E8 0 0 0 NA NA 3L M8 664 2100 1516 0.30 A S. 8 St. Drickell Ave. 1 95 4L ES 2752 3240 486 0.65 D OL M6 0 0 0 NA NA 145 S.M. 27 Ave. 4L E8 2208 3240 1032 0.68 e OL MS 0 0 0 NA NA Coral Mar erickell Ave. S.Y. 15 Rd. 2L Ee 2L MS S.Y. 15 Rd. S.M. 12 Ave. 2LO a 2LD Me S.M. 12 Ave. S.M. 27 Ave. 2LD Ee 2LD M8 8rickell Ave. S.E. 2 St. S.E. 7 St. 3L N1! 1409 2180 771 0.63 8 2L Se 1785 1360 -425 1.31 F S.E. I St. Rickenbacker 2L6 NS Niaai Ave. Flaller St. S. 13 Rd. 2L8 X SS a 936 2180 1244 0.43 A __ 31 SS 704 21% 1476 4.32 A -- L 13 Ad. Rickeabuker ZJ IH 2Li! N Ws LL f !t. V6 I XFA a m u •1 t93 LL 17A". 313 • 3L1 r LL If 6& iea8lee IL 3ti • 11 • tr�r� 1r. rlr.rws. LL V h& u i f0-Sep-ti6 a:so:24 POWT01M MIAHI 11H table 11.9; FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOw1ENDED NETMOp1( Area: BRICIM Scenario: PHASE TVO PM '>G �' ---•r----N----- NN----------- ---------------. r ; --,.•...-- If�ekrr •-..------- ; - - - ;------•--Pe,k-Hout-----------------------N ; p Se,eeet ; From ; To ; of Lanrs;Direction; Vol uar;Capacity;Excess C.; VIC LOS • - - - -N--- N-------------------------- ---------------- - ------- -- ------ -- ------ -----------N----N- S• 7 +►. b(I.:.=i1 n.:. ! :r V�i. Ez 'J v 11 h; tin p ' 3L YB 2111 2100 69 0.97 E t 45 S.M. 27 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 MA NA 3L MB 1622 2180 559 0.74 C Brickell Ave. 1 95 4L EB 1292 3240 1948 0.40 A OL MB 0 0 0 NA NA 195 SA-27 Ave. 4L EB 1453 3240 1707 0.45 A OL MB 0 0 0 NA NA _- Coral May Brickell Ave. S.M. 15 Rd. 2L EB 469 1360 691 0.35 A 2L MI 1646 IS60 -266 1.21 F s S.M. 15 Rd. S.M. 12 Ave. 21.0 E8 551 1800 1249 4.31 A 21.0 MI 1534 1800 266 0.85 D S.Y. 12 Ave. S.M. 27 Ave. 21.0 EB 1720 1800 60 0.96 E -= 2LD MD 20" 1800 -290 1.16 F _ irickeil Ave. S.E. 2 St. S.E. 7 St. 2L NB 1724 1360 -364 1.27 F 3L St 1629 2180 551 0.75 C =� S.E. 7 St. Rickenbacker 2LD IIB 1012 1000 768 0.56 A 21B SB 2432 1800 -632 1.35 F Niw Are. Hailer St. S. 15 Rd. 3L a 1351 2126 @29 O 62 B 3L u in 21H 1485 0.12 A L t5 wl. itick"Awker ti! 0 ii9 two 1131 0.37 A 21.1 BA 2141 Zia 448 1.11 F I Ii LL I M. a 1 VA a 2m • wV a 3 e t I I A iG.11. 17 An. 313 a 30 21a -W 1.31 F 311 a iat 2M -IM 2.io F LL 1760. till" IL RJ a W& 2M -M 1.21 F 31! a iat 21% -3W LIS F err Or. LL 27 Awe. 3U a ft to Mi 0.6413 31A a MM IND -410 !.A F ISM Of irk is 4 feaiia 86 WW +e1 dkn ad -el iMlremm • W 845 11-70 (:a t y «rC: �;y�. �m 1Oe47�27 BOINiTOMN NIANI DRl Table 11.91 FMME TRAFFIC - RECONME1 M METIM Area MI • ScMiHos PP45E T-""_r �M 1. I 6 Nuabtr i s---------p.t-4lorr---------------_--------{ 1l�ant l From 6 To 6 of Lam (DirectionI Voluae(Capacity lEzcess C.i V/C LOB 6 BN 13611 3" Biscayne Blvd. 193 2L FM E6 2L FM M6 1 93 N.M. 27 Ave. 3L FM E1 3L FM Y1 N.Y. 27 Ave. LeJeune Rd. SL FM E1 3L FM MI - NacArtber Csrr. Alton Rd. Biscayne 61vd. 3L FM EQ _ 3L FM Y1 Biscayne Blvd. N.E. 62 St. N.E. 36 St. 2L a 71 RA M.F. U P. 1 39s 71 MII 1 61 N.E. 1 Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flagler St. SL NI 129/ 1920 i22 �.i1 1 OL ff o o e NA NA Niaai Ave. N. 36 St. N. 17 St. 2L N1 � SI _- N.M. 1 Ave. N.Y. 20 6t. Flaller St. IL N1 1L 61 N.Y. 2 Ave. N.M. 20 St. Fla4ler St. 1L a 1L 61 l !s N.Y. 79 St. 6R 112 SL FV 0 X FM SB ( 61 112 61 816/1 393 SL FY NB a� Ni FY a �s C7V—CT't�.i _ 11-71 Am ,. uC 29 MUM it# BOMNTOMN RIANl ORl Table 11.9: FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOMIENOEO NETVW Scenario: PHASE THREE PM •--ww--ww-------------------w- ww w__-w-www-ww_ w-w_.- ..- ----ww--- ie�eent ! Fro+ P TO I of Lanrs'lQirectioni VolustiCapacity',Ucess C.I. -EB---------w3S68--�-----»--N»w� VIC LOS I - SR 836/I 395 —»YBiscaynr-Blvd. 1 95 2L-FM + 2L FM NB 4594 + 1 95 N.M. 27 Avr. 3L FM EB 3794 + 3L FM MB 6391 + -_ — N.M. 27 Ave. ledeune Rd. 3L FM EB 43" =_ 3L FM MB 7225 + NuArthur Cswy. Alton Rd. Biscayne Blvd. 3L FM EB 2855 + _ -- 3L FM MB 2241 + Biscayne Blvd. N.E. 62 St. N.E. 36 St. 2L NO 2881 1360 -1521 2.12 F 2L SB 160E 1360 -448 1.33 F M.E. 36 St. 1 3" 2L NB 3026 1360 -1666 2.23 F _ 2L SB 1669 1360 -309 1.23 F N.E. t Ave. N.E. 17 St. Flaller St. 3l IIB 2854 1920 -934 1.49 F OL SB 0 0 0 NA NA Niaei Ave. N. 36 St. N. 17 St. 2L NB 644 1360 716 0.41 A 2L SB 486 1360 674 0.36 A N.M. 1 Ave. N.Y. 20 St. Flaller St. IL NB 202 625 423 0.32 A 11 0 102 625 523 0.16 A N.M. 2 Ave. N.M. 20 St. Flaller St. IL NB 634 625 -9 1.01 F IL SB 225 425 400 0.34 A t 95 N.M. 79 St. SR 112 5L FN IM 119" + 5L FV 9 6557 + �! SR 112 2 B36/1 395 5L FM 0 14122 • — 5l FV SB 6929 + e LMI Of Scalp is a f Ktiee of syaha oBeratiens aed eatenal ieflw - Jim Am - 11-72 11:5Bt36 j 3 a • DOYNTOYN NIANI OR1 Table 11.9t FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOMNEMOED 4ETVW " Scenario: PHASE THREE AN --------»------------- ------ -------------------------------------»_.»�----»�»-_»»_w� »»»»» Speeet --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Fros I To I of Lanes3irectionl Vol uselCapacity'Excess C.I VIC LOS I Port Bridge Port of Niaoi Siscayni Blvd. SLD EB 2650 2280 -370 1.16 F 3LD MB 935 2290 1345 0.41 A N. 6 St. Biscayne Blvd. t 95 OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L MB 574 1170 596 0.49 A o N. S St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 SL EB 1477 1920 443 0.77 C - OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA N. 1 St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L MB 405 1170 765 0.35 A Flagler St. Biscayne Blvd. M. 2 Ave. OL EB 0 0 0 NA NA 2L MB 576 1170 594 0.49 A == V. 2 Ave. Y. 27 Ave. IL EB 2L YB — S. I St. Biscayne Blvd. S.M. 2 Ave. A EB 1406 1920 434 0.77 C OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA — S.Y. 2 Ave. S.Y. 27 Ave. X EB 1750 2180 430 0.90 C OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA Biscaym Blvd. 1 3" Port Blvd. 31.0 MB 1712 2280 368 0.75 C -- 3l0 a 2854 22BO -574 1.25 F - Port Blvd. S.E. 2 St. 4LD NB 1348 2920 1572 0.46 A 311 SB 2249 2280 .31 0." E N.E. 2 Ave. 1 39S Flagler St. OL NB 0 0 0 MA NA 3L SB 3432 19H -1512 1.79 F Niad Are. N. 17 St. Haller St. OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA 3L SB 712 t92O 1200 0.37 A M. 2 Are. Flaller St. S.M. 718 St. IL NB 9O3 623 -290 1.43 F IL sa 931 625 -313 1.50 F 193 SR NV 13" S. M. B St. 3N.FN 0 . SLFM SI 7 �� oz:�rt33 NOTONN M1AMI DRl Table 11.9t FUTURE TRAFFIC - RECOMENDED NETNM Areas CBI ' Stentrio: ppAgc t�^'= ry i i I Nuaber 1 I---------PeAk-Ho�a-------------�.--.•.-----.1 Smelt I Froe I To I of lanos;nir.rrinn; VolumICaoacityIExcess C.1 VIC LOS I Port Bridge Port of Miasi Biscayne Blvd. 3LD ED 1200 7280 1060 0.53 A RD NB 2540 2280 -260 1.11 F N. 6 St. Bisuyee Blvd. 1 95 OL El 0 0 0 NA NA — 2l NB 903 1170 267 0.77 C --- N. S St. Biscayne Blvd. 1 95 A ED 917 1920 1003 0.46 A — OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA N. t It. liscavne Blvd. 1 95 OL ED 0 0 0 NA NA r _ 2L NB 643 1170 327 0.55 A Flagler St. Biscayne Blvd. N. 2 Ave. OL El 0 0 0 NA NA 2l NB 1131 1170 39 0.97 E N. 2 Ave. N. 27 Ave. IL ED 277 763 509 0.35 A 2L NB 1763 1170 -613 1.52 F _ S. I St. Biscayne Blvd. S.N. 2 Ave. 3L ED 1251 1920 669 0.65 I ; - OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA ? 6.1. 2 Ave. S.N. 27 Ave. A ED 948 2100 1232 0.44 A - - OL NB 0 0 0 NA NA — liscayee Blvd. 13" Port Blvd. U NB 3143 2290 -663 1.38 F 31.0 Be 1642 2280 638 0.72 C Port Blvd. S.E. 2 St. 41.1 NI 2430 2920 490 0.63 / 3L0 Sl loll 2no 469 0.79 C N.E. 2 A". 1 3" Flagler St. OL No 0 0 0 NA NA r -t 3L SI 1574 1920 346 0.02 0 1 Niui Ave. N. 17 St. Flagler St. OL Na 0 0 0 NA NA —� 3L a 374 1920 1544 0.20 A N. 2 A". Flagler St. 1.1. 7/0 St. IL NB ml 625 -IM 1.43 F -- IL M It" 625 -474 1.75 F M NUI 395 I.N. B It. liFli M M1 -- YFII • ilit _' 0 id" 111 boom M a #010w r soft dowdim add addl• WOMEN& i MUM DOWNTOWN NIANi DRl • hble 11.9, FUTURE TRAFFIC - REC^*'"M NETWORK Area: bd1i.KELL Scesario: PHASE THREE AN -------------------------- ------ --------------- ------•------•---•__��_----------_--__.._�__��_�._ Nusber ; ;---------Ptak-Hour....._._._.�.._�__ M Seyeent ; Fros ; To ; of Lanes;Direction; Volum Mapacity;Excess C.; VIC LOS 1 S. 1 St. Brickell Ave. 1 45 0l ED 0 • 0 •N---O•-~--NA -MM-MA - SL WB 943 2120 1237 0.43 A 1 95 S.M. 27 Ave. OL ES 0 0 0 NA NA 3L MB 726 2180 1454 0.33 A S. 8 St. Brickell Ave. 1 95 4L ED 3067 3240 173 0.95 E OL Y8 0 0 0 NA NA -= 1 95 S.M. 27 Ave. 4L ED 2357 3240 883 0.73 C OL WB 0 0 0 NA NA Coral by Brickell Ave. S.M. 15 Rd. 2L ED — 2L MB S.Y. 15 Rd. S.W. 12 Ave. 2LD E8 2LD MB S.Y. 12 Ave. S.M. 27 Ave. 2L0 E8 2LD MS Brickell Ave. S.E. 2 St. S.E. 7 St. 3L NB 1504 2100 676 0.49 1 j 2L St 1889 1360 -521 1.31 F S.E. 7 St. Rickedacker 2U a 2LO 58 hied Ave. Flaller St. S. 15 Rd. X N8 1041 2180 1139 0.4 A 3L S8 iD1 210 1171 06V A i. 15 Rd. kictubacker 2U a 2Lf 9 ,.. 1 A B.N. t St. 1S 1 WIN • • 1 t'3 A.A. 17 . u - 3ti - l1L 1160. AL - �311 c � !►. llid r LL V Am u • 3 -_ 41.. ,. il-Sep-ib 1i:11:55 DOWNTOWN NIANI NI Table 11.9: FUitgtE TRAFFIC - RECOM M I NET= Arent NICKELL Scenarios PHASE THREE PR .»------------------- ---- ------- --------------- ---------- ---------- -----------------_�._ww__ww._..___--w.w � _aw.__-Peak-i4atr- 1. SgMnt 1 Fros 1 To 1 o4 LdneslDirtctioni Volu`tlCapacity:Eurss C.: VIC LOS 1 M.M.---w__. ------- --w-------------------- ---aww__---r---_�•_--w--a_.r_-rw_r_r-ww_-wr._--www w__... 1A X MD 2324 2180 -144 1.07 F I 95 S.M. 27 Ave. OL ED 0 0 0 NA NA St. NB 1765 2180 415 0.81 0 S. 8 St. 8rickeil Ave. 195 4L E8 1416 3240 1824 0.44 A OL M6 0 0 0 NA NA 1 95 S.M. 27 Ave. 4L ED 1517 3240 1723 0.47 A OL M8 0 0 0 NA NA Coral May lrickeli Ave. S.M. 15 Rd. 2L ED 509 1360 852 0.37 A 2L Mi 1724 1360 -364 1.27 F S.Y. 15 Rd. S.M. 12 Ave. 21.0 E8 3" 1800 1211 0.33 A 2L0 46 1612 1800 t88 0.90 D S.M. 12 Ave. S.M. 27 Ave. 2LD E8 1751 1800 49 0.97 E 2LD MB 2145 t800 -345 1.19 F brickell Ave. S.E. 2 St. S.E. 7 St. 2L NB 1616 1360 -456 1.34 F 3L SS 1729 2180 451 0.79 C S.E. 7 St. Rickeebacker n NS 1125 1600 675 0.62 1 2LD SB 2617 1800 -817 1.45 F Masi A". Flayler St. S. 15 Rd. 31. Ne 1547 2190 633 0.71 C 3l. Si 915 2180 IU3 0.37 A S. 15 Rd. Rickeebacker 2LD MI 756 1900 1044 0.42 A 21.1 S1 2349 1900 -541 1.31 F 115 S.M. S St. us t 2LFY M 3073 e 2LFY 51 5301 e i i 19i S.II. 17 Are. 3Li a 3555 2785 -1070 1.31 F mi a 6174 27M -30 L32 F LL 11 Are. loon M. 311 r 3SA 21i5 -;M /.V F 3Li 81 30 21'1S -1191 Lq F Itpum Sr. Kdaee4aeber LL 21 Are. RA • qi t3M 42 1u 1 . ii M M an iN L45 i • iaW of In" is a #=dim M Mtea aieratim ad eetarnal iefinKm TABLE 11.10 FUTURE TRAFFIC PEAT -7MRSECTION ANALYSIS Critical Tiaft Level of Percent Excess Intersection Period Service Saturation Capacity Biscayne Boulevard/ PM D 83 278 N.E. 19th Street N.E.. 2nd Avenue/ PM A 48 887 N. Miami Avenue/ PM A 31 19192 N. 20th Street N. Miami Avenue/ PM A 18 19483 N. 17th Street Biscayne Boulevard/ PM F 101 -15 N.E. 15th Street N. Miami Avenue/ PM A 24 19313 N. 15th Street N.W. 1st Avenue/ PM A 19 1.451 N.E. 14th Street. N.E. 1st Avenue/ PN F 108 -143 I-395 (north Rapp) AN A 41 1,060 N. E. 1st Avenue/ PN E 89 1" I-395 (South ) M A 30 IOUs N.1- 40 1 t +) AN C N w N.1- / NIsm ( ) M A alwAyse bwlevard/ PN t n Mil 1- Biscayne Boulevard/ PM 6 61 746 N.E 12th Street N.E. lstAve / NI ElitM 1 N.E. 6th Street M A V V. it ie 1I.W. A 36 to= N.W. streetM 36 8i 6 1eyr PH E M 1/6 • O.E. SO St+ett 11--77 .0 11.10 FUTUM Timric ME HOM :CRIMOUVION ANNWIS !Wr4DRK Critical Time period level of �ice Percent Saturation Fsooess intersection N.E. 2nd Avenue/ PM A 47 950 N.E. 5th Street N.E.- 1st Avenue/ PH A 51 894 N..". vZ wt;. --et N. Miami AVRx=/ R4 A 24 Ir365 N. Sth Street N.W. 2nd Avenue/ IN D 88 200 N.W.-3rd Street Biscayne Boulevard/ R4 A 53 813 N.E. 1st Street N. Miami Avenue/ 94 A 34 1;193 N. 1st Street N.W. 2nd Avenue/ R4 A 53 850 N.W. 16t StEsst N.W. 2nd Avenue/ Al i 91 154 riaglAw Street S.E. Let k"MO/ A 40 1#072 S.E. 2st S " 0 1 &W. 2nd l 1 43 03 1st stmeft S. mimed AWOM/ S. 2nd Stwaft ft4irim,11 Avenue/ 96 227 6" S.E. 7th Street AVON=/ SK C 76 441 S. HiMEL IL 7t:h StZGSt A 42 18029 XJL W S. 7th stgo 2% M ILV. 3od bANNISI w 47 S.W. 7th StgWt S.W. 4th Memel176 C 70 U9 S.W..th @bN*t M Ik IN TABLE 11.10 (Continuedl FUTURE TRAF EAK HUUK INIMLL11ON ANALYSIS RECOMENDED NETWORR Critical Time Level of • Percent Excess Intersection Period Service Saturation Capacity Brickell Avenue/ PM E 91 142 S.E. 8th Street AM E 94 101 S. tile; V 68 S.-8th Street AM E 89 193 S.W. 3rd Avenue/ PM D 77 411 S.W. 8th Street AM E 87 155 S.W. 4th Avenue/ PH B 67 616 S.W. 8th Street AM D so 355 Brickell Avenue/ PH E 93 115 Al S.E. 13th Street S.W. 3rd Avenue/S.W. 15th Road/S.W. 13th Street PM 8 56 788 Brickell Avenue/ PH F 106 95 S.E. 15th Road OW4 S. Maxi Avenue/ PH C 77 391 S. 15th Road } �� E. pARKIN6 1. FOR THE FIRST OEYELOPNENT PNAS►E, SPECIF�i' THE t00ITIONAL PARKING SPACES BY PLANNING AREA NECESSARY TO SERVE THE AM�NT OF DEVELOPMENT OUTLINED IN TABLE II.1. k'HERE AT -GRADE PARKING IS NOT INTENAEO, Si�1i PROPOSED GARAGE SITES ANO SPECIFY Tt�E f�tlt�sBER OF PARKING SPACES TO EE PRtiYinr�. ' It is anticipated that all parking associated with new office development will be provided in structures associated with the proposed development. This is a reflection of the relative high cost of land through the study area as compared to the cost of construction of the structure. '�c�' i��Mr The present City of Miami zoning codes specify the minimum and maximum C�` �; number of parking spaces that the City would allow for the various types of land uses developed within the Study area. Naturally, these requirements vary by sub -area with the City presently prohibiting -- parking in the CBD zone. However, the City has also recognized that the transit system does not yet fully serve Metropolitan Dade County and they have allowed, by special exception, recent CBD office developments —=- to include on -site parking facilities with ratios that vary from 1 space -_ per 400 GFA to 1 space per 1200 GFA. �. - ��, �� � The City of Niami is presently in the pracess of reanalyzing parkin �: needs in the Dawntown area. It may lead to the tmarket dictating the �= actual parking ssapply. This would be similar to recent occurrences in -= the Brickell Area where developers appeared to prefer a parking ratio of _� � I/80O GfA which wild fail within the acceptable range bttween 1/GOO GFA -� and 2/1tX10 GFA of offitat uss. -= For Ibis study it w€s ass�ed that during Phase 1. wi�ich is the only - �� � �evelttp■ient prase reirinq a paricir� response. that the av+era� parkt� sMppiy far office space to eater of the sub -aegis ra41 i be o� s�sct per 3 7�0 iFA of us�t. ter this ass�ptian prirate parlcl�g smarty for . �' Office �e that r�+uld be provided r Prase 1 Aewtioprnt is __= = z�trised betow. . �- t Sub Area Parking_ � C80 4,43O _ 8rickell 4 �5 Total I�;�" . q �ti va �4 j is ! f � a�rt�tio � ' . � 7� fAi a vat a in this s . 'Es o0 tM drsti of Ci tdt of lei i bat - is +e 1t rses t y t foi tip r of trf t t�tte 1'Ire issue s ove�°ati a cy of a of one space per TOO GFA for tJhe jor use® that beic, ral affi� - Tee adzgteacy cif ttie zorrir►g rati�ai �r:i di.� Eae:.i ��. .�:�t.:w r �.:,:. : r. � 3 � . =- parking with public expeftures„ _ st by apprc on a site basis -. a- -----�_..�.T_._.i���� __..__..�_._��_e�._.___�__ .__.____ _..... - z=, r a R rather than on a system basis. This determination is made based on an assumed building size. converted to a number of employees, which are then further converted to vehicles arriving in the sub -areas. This conversion included estimates of individuals who would not be at tht office on a given days transit ridership, arrivals by other modes, and �'�. the peak parking accumulation ratios. The remaining employees were • then cov�rtnd to vehicles at 1.25 nersnns per vehicle and compared to the on site pnr•�ir;g supply at a ra;.io ut one space per iva tern. The table shown below indicates the off -site parking requirements per 1,000 GFA. The calculation is made by sub -areas because of the input factors, such as transit ridership, vary by sub -area. It was also recognized that ranges, rather than paint estimates, of this off -site requirement were necessary because of the technical assumptions made in ■iny of the input values in this calculation. Off -site Parking Requirements Parkin Re uirement Per 1000 GFA Sub -area �g_ a tum ow r c e a.8i �i— ii: i8 powntown 0.10 0.00 0.00 Omni .- 0.87 0.51 0.18 lie would recoma�end of course, that the median value be � iA tAe CilWlation of the off -site parking requirements. ?titre is � off -site parking requirement for office space tm toe CUO (median value). The reason that the C80 area has no r+egwira�t, is its pro�ettion of higher transit ridership. When a higher weber of a�leyees at gireo sites are converted to transit ridersls than the •ff-site parting re�ui t diminishes accordingly. !. INCLi� tN Alt tX A C�SCiIIPTit�t OF A SOLUTI011/t�Ilt?tlil� TNA7 1iou.Ei IIMiT +ttr6 iM A1tEA5 fEGTEO TO iiAi� ACCESSlB1LITY (AS Eh I� S�€C"tt0li Q j IM R TO l�IllTAli1 Y LEVELS OF SEAYIC�. REt �1tIE �.EVEl.Se t SE T��'SIT R1t�RSNIP. h�+esent City of Nisi %iis�g c brit the nt of parking that can be provided for de�aet nt �tithin each ®f the sue►-ae�as. lag code parking requirements for office dereio nt are reset! below for each sub -area. 1� Exist;n� Parkino Reauiresnents Sub -areas Parkin- Su 1 mini"""'- By Spec"'�i"a xcep on Only q0 Oy Spatial Exception Oely trickell 1 space/b06 GfA-llaxtwr� t =pace/IOOA 6FA-Miai�r .� . ._ �� _� __ As previously indicated, recent office development in tin CM No received the special exceptio" required to allow co -site ping. The on -site supply has ranged from a high of I space/450 GFA to a low of I space/1200 GFA with an average of approximately I spar*fgW GFA. Tbm of these development projects have been located in Dupont Flaxa, one of the more congested areas Downtown. The oarkinR s,trniv mt *h+•• r rav a ;,i�, i �Nace/. vu orn W Sa vi a paCe /I2 fFA. , Two recently approved large office developments in the Brickell area have reVested and received approvals to provide on -site parking at ratios (I space/850 GFA) less than the maximug allowable. Both of these projects are located on Brickell Avenue, the most eo su--t r dway in the Brickell area. It is apparent that the City of Miami has been successful, through enforcement of its zoning code, in limiting parking in areas of present and projected vehicular congestion. These decisions, to limit parking supply in particular areas, were based on the knowledge that the existing Metrorail and Metromover systems would be in place. This type of progressive planning and decision making process is necessary to ensure the continued development of Downtown Miami. From an areawide perspective it is not necessary for the City to enact additional legislation to limit the parking supply for the Phase 1 development scenario. Rather, the City should continue its policy of restricting the parking supply on a site basis in areas projected to have increased vehicular congestion. the decision to restrict on -site parking should also consider future transit accessibility. Maintaining an areawide parking supply while restricting the on -site supply can be accomplished by requiring or providing additional parking off -site. This off -site supply should be located in areas projected to have good vehicular accessibility and which provide transit service to the area where the on -site supply is restricted. For example, if a developer proposed a development in Dupont Plaza the on -site parking supply could be limited based on recent practice. If, based on specific need, the developer could demonstrate that additional patting is required to support the project, the additional off -site supply could be located in the western area of the C60 adjacent to a Netromover Station. It is also possible that the off -site parking supply 'could be located in another peripheral area with the developer S?��Nitiff'q ttIe s,,-14r uie v� .L,.. �;sr fc: t:yi;; concept of off -size p;�ri, 4i ral parking and devel rated shuttle service has been established in the Brickell area. With the proposed extensions of Ketromover to Omni and Brickell the con- cept of peripheral parking in conjunction with Metromover stations sold be viewed as an aroawi0e o rtuivity. The e h r r ! fr�►we+* ... wi .. .m ... �.... ._.. ..v . ... .. �.i N. . 4. r.. irarc in Omni. 0% F. ALTERNATIVE 14DDES 1. SPECIFY THE TAPE AND FREQUENCY OF CURRENT AND PROPOSED PUBLIC TRANSIT SERVICE. MAP CURRENT MODE SPLITS, RELEVANT ROUTES, AND STOPS (J-5 SERIES). • ,r. ^t :.t.'`,�t !"'.,Cc �� e: _ ..;n%:4•.l ;1iu,:1 .R! aLudy area is prcv�ced via a combination of Metrorail, Metromover, and Metrobus service. There are thm Netrorail Stations located within the study area. The Rrickell Fktrorail Stations serving the Brickeil area, the Government Center Station serving the Downtown CBD area and the Overtown Station series S.E. Over/Park West. The COD Ketromover systems with nine statiams provides transit service around the Downtown CBD area. The testy vile, twenty station Netrorail system presently provides ser- vice from 6:00 AN in the morning to 9:00 Pt4 in the evening. Headways in this system vary from six minutes during the peak hours to a maximum of thirty minutes during the evening off-peak hours. Existing hewn and hours of service are summarized below. HoWwa s s IS Minutes Existing Netrorail Service Hours of Service 7:00 AN to`9: 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM 6:00 AN to 7:00 AM 9:00 AN to 4:00 PM 6:00 PM to 7:00 PM 30 Minutes 7:00 PM to 9:00 PM The existing pak4mr city of the Netrorail System can be calculated based on existing hea6mys wring the peak lours. As Indicated Netrorail presently operates on six minute headways durlNth he AM and PN peak hours. Typically peak tour service is provided a four -car train with a capacity of 176 people per car. Based on these criteria the peak hour capacity of Netrorail is calculated as follow. MetroraI 1 x� Pea it q ae i t %hlcle capacity ® 176 Persons 6 minutes Head a•_rs a 10 Train-A/Pour one d.r_.tjcn 4 Car Trains - 40 vehicles/Hour • Capacity a`40 a 175 - 70 &H Tim maximum theoretical capacity of rail $Yom cm be "IC11. WW based System sWitication.this SOW4e the systen �Id rem at three almate ys with sine -car trains. Used or. tlmm Metrorail ' _Theoretical Capacity 3 Minute Headways - 20 Trains/Hour one direction 6 Car Trains - 120 vehicles/Hour one direction Capacity - 1?n x 175 = 21.000/your one-way &,.,vJIr,cur two-way The existing Metromover system provides service on 90 second headways. The services provided to nine stations on the system within the CBD area. Based on an existing service at 90 second headways the Metromover has an hourly capacity of 4,640. The maximum theoretical capacity of the Metromover system can be calculated based on an assumption of 75 second headways with an 11 vehicle fleet. Under these conditions the existing system would have a theoretical capacity of 1,656 persons per hour. Metromover -'E—x si tMnga 90 seconds Headways - 40 vehicles/hour LOS "E" Capacity - 116 persons 40 vehicles/hour x 116 persons - 4,640 persons/hour Maximum Capacity 75 second Headways/11 vehicle fleet - 66 vehicles/hour LOS "E" Capacity - 116 persons 66 vehicles/hour x 116 persons - 7,656 persons/hour Presently, there are approximately twenty-two (22) Metrobus routes which provided service into and through the study area. The tatty -two (22) routes presently serving Downtown represents approximately 35 pit of the total Netr ts- routes. The existing headways on the Netrolws system Into the study area ramp from eight ( minute headimys to as +fit ss i sixty (60) minute headways with an average of approximately twenty (20) minutes. A majority of these routes provide service into the =68 or". Future transit service into the study area will to provided by the some three systems that currently exist. The future level of Metrobus �= service is very difficult to predict since this service is wised on a regularly scheduled basis. However Metro Dade County Transportation = Administration is presently in the process of preparing final • engineering drawings for the extension of the Metromover system. These -= extensions include a leg north to the Omni area and —also a leg south into the 6rickell area. --_ Existing OW prepsed public traftit services ore, show on the 14ap J-5 yj roll 1w own= ammm m Vim', ...... . ...... Ilk, m I I OP— 'BI I I w WNW t'A igw'l '00, swim a wftftw A 'i��►�►'► 'ilia "�""L Y _ OR mlx�w m r ti to ��Iffm In the last year Metro -Dade Transportation Administration has undertaken a thorough analysis of current transit ridership into the study area. This analysis includes detailed estimates of the number of daily trip ends on both the Metrorail system and also the Metrobus system. Current mode splits are summarized below. Subareas Omni CBD Brickell S.E. Overtown/ Park West Existing DaillModes Splits 13% Total Trips 15Z 6% E3 t. MAP PROJECTED MODE SPLITS AND SPECIFY ALL OWIGES IN TRANSIT SERVICE NECESSARY TO ACNE THE PROJECTED RIDERSHIP (J-6 SERIES). WI ERICALLY ILLUSTRATE THE PEAK HDUR LINK CAPACITY OF THE P110POSE0 TRANSIT SYSTEM AKD DEMONSTRATE THAT THE CAPACITY IS NOT EXCEEDED BY PROJECTED DEMAND. It is projected that modes splits in the Downtown Study area will continue to increase. This increase is the result of two conditions. ^ First, is that by Phase I development the extensions of Metromover to Omni and Brickell will have occurred. Second, as development continues to increase in Downtown and the roadway system serving the study am des more congested, the number of pule usirq the transit service wlil also incrmasa. Projected modes splits, by sub -area for each pkm of dereloptnt are susmarized below. Projected Daily Node aelits Sub4km Phase I II III awl 11.4% 14:91 TM CBO 22.8% 22.5% 22.1% Brickell 14.3% 14.1% •14.2% S.E. Overtown/ 8.3% 8.2% 8.2% Park West Overall 177" I Based on the above modes splits and the previously identified capacities of the Metrorail and Metromover systems it can be de- nstrated th?t the capacity will ,not be exceeded by the projected demand. This projection is based on the assumed transit ridership splits between Metrorail and Metrobus shown on the Downtown travel characteristics projections contained in the appendix of this report. The projection of peak hour Metrorail trips is based on an analysis of current peaking characteris- tics at the Downtown Government Center Station. The Mown Goverment I~i Station Center was used because this is the* only station for which =• ON I Projected peak Hour Metrorail Ridership Formula Daily Transit Ridership x Metrorail Percent x Peak Four Percent. Phase I 66,357 x 0.20 x 0.19 R 6,320 Peak Hour Trips Phase II ,549 x 0.22 x 0.19 - 7,720 Peak Flour Trips Phase III 207;718 x .24 x 0.19 , 9,470 Peak Four Trips The peak hour capacity can serve the projected demand under its current configuration. 3. FOR ANY NEEDED CHANGES IN SERVICE INCLUDE A DESCRIPTION OF WHATEVER ACTION (S) ARE NECESSARY TO ACCOMPLISH THE CHANGE. There are no projected changes in Metrorail or Metromover services other than those that have previously been described. The Metrobus system as previously discussed is a contimmsly pland system that can be rerouted and changed to meet the Downtown dewends. However, it is anticipated that when the Phase t Netromover system is in place a timber of the bus routes presently serving Downtown may be diverted to the Metromover stations on the periphery of the study area. This policy is consistent with the present transit planning philosophy of routing the bus system into Metrorail and Downtown Metromover stations. 4. PROVIDE A MAP (J-7) SHOWING ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED BIKEWAYS WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN DR I BOUNDARY AND SPECIFY THE COST OF CONSTRUCTING BIKEWAYS TO CONNECT WITH THE EXISTING SYSTEMS. AT MINIMUM, BIKEWAYS SHOULD CONNECT NA3OR ACTIVITY CENTERS AND TRANSIT STATIONS WITH THE BIKEWAY SYSTEM. BICYCLE STORAGE FACILITY SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE PLANS. Presently there is a continuous bike path under the Metrorail System. Bicycle storage facilities are provided at a number of Metrorail stations. In addition to the Metrorail bike storage facilities a number of the Department of Off -Street Parking facilities also contained bicycle storage facilities. These facilities are available for rental from the appropriate public agencies. The devpl cr�-�nt of b9--.1--­ n is not encouragedbycurrent St,;Le 6icycie Planning and Design guidelines. 5. PROVIDE A MAP (J-B) SHOWING ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER TRANSIT ROUTES AND THE COST OF IMPLEMENTING AND MAINTAINING SERVICE. ILLUSTRATE NOW FARES WOULD COVER OPERATING COSTS. Existing waterborne transportation services in the study area is limited .. S-9 11�B6 W 1 to gal Harbour in Miami Beach.' Over the past several years there has ban numerous attempts to provide a commuter water borne transportation system to the Downtown area. ►resent conceptual water transit services are being proposed more as a water taxi type of service than previous attempts at providing what would be consider a water bus service. The water taxi type of service would be a demand service which would carry people to various locations tray the Miami River along the bay front and also to the Port of Miami. Map J-B shows some potential locations and routes for a water taxi services within the Downtown study area. Such a system could be supported by major hotels and waterfront retail centers. r"1 6. Capacity Monitoring 1. DESIGN CAPACITY MONITORING PROGRAMS FOR ROADWAYS, INTERSECTIONS, AND TRANSIT THAT DETERMINE USE AND ALLOW CALCULATION OF AVAILABLE UNUSED CAPACITY, AND THAT USE "CAPACITY ACCOUNTS" TO SHOW THE AMOUNT OF ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT THAT MAY BE PERMITTED WITHOUT OVERBURDENING* THE TIRAN"�Of iATION SYSTEM. TWO TYPES OF CAPACITY ACCOUNTS SHGULD 6E: 1) PLANNING ACCOUNT, DEBITED WHEN ANY DEVELOPMENT PERMIT** IS ISSUED AND CREDITED WHEN A ROADWAY OR TRANSIT IMPROVEMENT IS "COMMITTED" (SEE A2 ABOVE FOR DEFINITION OF COMMITTED); AND 2) A MONITORING ACCOUNT, -DEBITED WHEN BUILDING SPACE IS OCCUPIED AND CREDITED WHEN THE ROADWAY OR TRANSIT IMPROVEMENT IS OPENED FOR SERVICE. THE MONITORING PROGRAM MUST ALSO INCLUDE A MECHANISM FOR DETERMINING THE NEED FOR AND TIMING OF ADDITIONAL FACILITIES. The implementation and success of any capacity monitoring program has to be a joint effort between the private and public sectors. The private sector would be responsible for providing the public agency with the capacities required to serve their particular development. The public agency would be responsible for providing the private sector with available capacities and procedures for calculating capacity consumption, available capacities, V/C ratios and level of service criteria. This report has established excess capacity for 41 roadway links serving Downtown and within Downtown as well as 42 intersections within the Downtown study area. These excess capacities have been calculated for the beginning and ending of each of the three development phases. However, excess intersection capacity has only been established for Phase I. Excess intersection capacity prior to Phase I development (Table 11.6) is based on an assumption that all Permitted Development is completed and fully occupied. Intersection excess capacity calculated for Phase I development is based on the vehicle occupancy, mode splits, trip generation and assignment procedures contained in this report. Excess capacities for use in developing the capacity monitoring programs should be based on the capacities available prior to Phase I under the assumption that all Permitted Development will eventually be constructed and fully occupied. If this does not occur the monitoring accounts would have to be debited accordingly. The monitoring account also has to be flexible enough to allow adjustments to account for changes in vehicle occupancy. mode splits and driver behavior as well as roadway improvements. It is assumed that all development projects required to obtain a Kajor Use Special permit will be required to provide a traffic impact study demonstrating that the V/C ratio and LOS criteria will not be exceeded. The traffic impact study for individual developments should follow the saw general guidelineso procedures and methodologies contained in this report. Prior to initiating a traffic impact study, the developer and his traffic consultant, certified by FDOT in traffic operations studies and design (area classes 3.05 and 3.06) or equivalent, would have a preappiication meeting with the City to establish the study parameters. The de.eloper would present his study methodology, including but not • limited to; trip generation rates, vehicle occuvancy, mode split and a55ic,�;r;t�v pruc�cun�s c- ;,ity's vppruvai. The City wouia tuenttry the critical intersections and roadway links to be analyzed. The City would also provide the developer the available capacities for the appropriate roadway links and intersections. It is then the developer's responsibility to provide a report detailing the project's consumption of available capacity and provide the remaining excess capacity. If it is determined that a particular development will exceed pre -established Y/C ratios and LOS criteria it will be the developer's responsibility to propose roadway/intersection improvements and/or TSM measures to maintain these criteria. The City of Miami will provide the SFRPC, a yearly analysis of the capacity monitoring program. When the City has determined that the LOS requirements specified in the SFRPC agreements have been reached the Transportation Question of the ADA will be updated. The update will determine the transportation improvements necessary to allow additional development while maintaining the appropriate LOS thresholds. Is QUESTION 12A: WASTEWATER, WATER, AND SOLID WASTE 40 1) IDENTIFY THE UNUSED WASTEWATER TREATMENT, WATER TREATMENT, AND SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL CAPACITY PROJECTED TO BE•AVAILABLE FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT IN THE STUDY AREA FOR EACH PHASE. Wastewater Treatment here are three regional wastewater treatment districts in Dade County: the North, South and Central Districts. The total average daily flow presently being treated the thr !� re;4-;nal plants is approximat�1y 254 million gallons per day (mgd) with 3.29 mgd of that total being generated by the Downtown D.R.I. area. The D.R.I. area is located within the Central District which is now interconnected with the South District and will also be interconnected to the North District in 1988. For this analysis the combined North/South/Central flows will be considered for all phases to ensure consistency. Total Wastewater Unused Capacity Available Phase Treatment Capacity For New Development County Wide Within D.R.I. Area (millions of gallons per day)(millions of gallons per day) Present 276 1.62* Phase I 308 2.28 Phase II 365.5 3.30 Phase III 384.25 4.69 *Includes projects which are unoccupied, under construction, or approved for construction. It is anticipated that the rate of growth/development within the D.R.I. area will substantially exceed that of most other areas within the North/South/Central Treatment Districts. Therefore, the capacity allocated to the D.R.I. area should be considered as a base figure which will increase as other areas remain relatively unchanged. In addition, projected total capacities for all three districts include the conversion of approximately 75 'million gallons per day flow fromindividual septic tank/disposal field systems. F tag for the constractiao 0 tar collection facilities to serve these s tic t t tis sal field syst4ft Will b&Vt tG COW f Ot Cr*ZttZ6 Of SPCC42 as t t&Atng district abich tust be patd to total by property owners within each district. It Is unlikely that a substantial number of these systems will to eliminated by the construction of new wastewater collection systems following this mechanism. Various state regulatory agencies have also expressed a desire to discourage the construction of wastewater collection facilities along the western most fringes of the present developed areas of Dade County as a method to control growth. 12A-1 CENTRAL DiSTAiCI WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Loom ar�r.wMrwr Mr v . it fawomew"ow swewrlfM �rwr�frr �1 — UPAW ANA sulk iU" .04 v LRCM Kui CF TM IW NO ALL O/ "" COW" M AViUBLE F*" City & COUOTT f1Ab"12 DUT. ,1 L;ic �t1115CYu� ail' JI — 4 f mw AM A+s b L Kw% AM Vaq tsa, tits wmw-ftAr ail Aim a." &No----tv owuwtwd4 tiaj MAP 1 1 EXISTING AND PROPOSED WASTE WATER FACIUTIES 1 DOWNTOWN A `iER PLAN dEL()PMNT CIF �r1ttiR�11t_ �,At"llll°i' T / a es.• silo • • i It should be noted that the projected treatment capacities are designed to accommodate the projected growth, not to limit it, and are periodically reviewed and updated. Water Treatment' Dade ounty is served by three major water treatment plants and contains two major interconnected water treatment districts divided by Flagler Street. The Downtown D.R.I. area which draws from both districts currently consumes 4.11 million gallons per day (mgd) of water. The table below reflects total capacity county wide based on the Miami - Dade Water and Sewer Authority Department Water Facilities Expansion Plan. If actual growth should be more rapid than anticipated by this plan then construction projects will be advanced to meet this need. The available unused capacities listed are cumulative through the phases listed. Total Water Unused Capacity Available Phase Treatment Capacity For New Development County Wide Within D.R.I. Area (millions of gallons per day)(millions of gallons per day) Present 358 2.73* Phase I 445 3.29 Phase II 481 4.34 Phase III S2S 6.40 *Includes projotts Wch V* MCCIMM60 MdJW e8064+ 146. or #MVI N for ConstrnctISO. QUESTION 12 - OTHER PUBLIC FACILITIES A. WASTEWATER, WATER AND SOLID WASTE 1) IDENTIFY THE' UNUSED WASTEWATER TREATMENT, WATER TREATMENT, AND SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL CAPACITY PROJECTED TO BE AVAILABLE FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT IN THE STUDY AREA FOR EACH PHASE. SOLID WASTE The projected average daily volumes of solid waste for the different phases of development are shown below. The projected waste generation volumes for the three stages of development were calculated based on statistical data obtained from Dade County Department of Solid Waste. The statistical data outlining solid waste collection sources is included in the Appendix. The total projected waste generation demand for the three staps of development is anticipated to be the following. "We I VMW lv* et l ls. 3 TaftAbw 1M e it o%) lbstbw or 197.97 Tons/aty "a" 111 613!600 lbs/Day or 256.80 Tons/Day The solid waste generated will be basically residential, retail and office waste. A negligible amount of industrial or special waste is expected to be generated. Solid waste generated will be placed in standardized on -site containers per City of Miami Code Chapter 22 for regular pick-up by the different hauling companies and/or the City of Miami's Solid Waste Department. Most of the collection in the study area is presently done by private hauling companies, and this is expected to continue in the future. The solid waste will be transported to the Central Transfer Station by the collectors. The Central Transfer Station is located at 1150 N.W. 20th Street and is serving most of the City of Miami, the City of Miami Beach and some of the unincorporated areas of Dade County. From the Central Transfer Station the solid waste will be transfered by the Dade County Solid Waste Disposal Division to the South Dade Facility, or the Resources Recovery Facility for processing. The transfer of waste is coordinated through Dade County'• Solid Waste Disposal Division dispatchers based on daily traffic conditions and disposal capacity of the two sites. The existing Solid Waste Disposal Facilities referred to herein are shown on Map I. Currently [lade County's Solid haste Disposal Division is undergoing an expansion plan of their existing facilities W their mended "Solid Waste Disposal and he y Management Plan" dated We i, 14. The a ion plan s MAP 1- 2 EXISTIM43 A Y IC E DOWNTOWN ivy A STE Includes an increase in the capacities of the Resources Recovery Facility and South Dade Facility as well as an increase in the hours of operation and staffing of the facilities. An additional 30 acre landfill is already designed for the Resources Recovery Facility and additional cells are under construction at the South Dade Facility. Future expansion plans proposed by Dade County Solid haste Department call for an additional Resources Recovery Facility at the South Dade Facility and an expansion of the existing regional transfer stations. Metro Dade"s Solid Waste Generation Projection which is included in the Appendix represent projected solid waste generation up through the third phase of development for the entire Dade County area which includes the study area. Based on projected values from Dade County Solid Waste Disposal Department, waste generated by development will be accommodated by the County's facilities. A letter from the Assistant Director for Solid waste Disposal indicating Dade County's ability to dispose of the waste is Included in the Appendix. t1 IMCLROE IRMtITlIItM VQNMW 00 10 40" #W$ rM THAT QETEWK MAILWE CWKITY MST 10 ACCOUNT" Iv myELmom is T ►, w amt ur ` "CAPACITY ACCOUNT" WiEN MITI FACILI"IS COW 64 Lim THE MONITORING PROGRAMS IgJST ALSO INCLUDE A NECRUTIN IW DETERMINING THE NEED FOR AND TIMING OF ADDITIONAL FACILITIE6 AND DESCRIBE ACTIONS NECESSARY TO FUND AND OONSTRUCT I1EEOEA FACILITIES IN A TIMELY MANNER. WATER AND WASTEWATER The - prdjected'vnusedl•watd'r,and`,�astLwater-`treatment -capacfttes availabe within the DRI area as it was calculated by the City of Miami's Department of Water 6 Sewer are listed below. The unused water treatment capacity reflects capacity based on the Miami Dade Water and Sewer Authority Department Water Facilities Expansion Plan. The Expansions Plan for the various plants is included in the Appendix. WATER UNUSED CAPACITY PEE; WITHIN DRI (MG0) Present 2•73 Phase I 3.29 Phase II 4.34 Phase III 6.40 SERER rrtsant 1.62 rho" I 2.8 /ice I I t 4.0 _.... _�.MUM PMS* It 4.0 tie Phase III 4.48 4.0 _'. d, A comparison between projected demand, projected generation and i available treatment capacity indicated that there will be enough water and sewer treatment capacity for the projected growth scenarios for the three development phases. Presenity the Downtown DRI Study area is served by three major water transmission lines. A 42" diameter line from the north and a 36" diametr line from the west and a 24" diameter line from the south. The ultimate transmission capacity of a water line varies with size as listed below: PIPE I.D. ULTIMATE FLOW CAPACITIES 8" 1.0 M.G.O. 12" 2.4 M.G.Q. 16" 4.5 M.G.D. 20" 7.0 M.G.D. 24" 10.0 M.G.D. 30" 15.0 M.G.D. 36" 22.0 M.G.D. 42" 30.0 M.G.D. 48" 40.0 M.G.D. 54" 50.0 M.G.D. 60" 60.0 M.G.D. These ultimate flows are based upon a pipe flowing full with a guaranteed pressure of 40 PSI as established by Miami Dade Water and Sewer Authority. These major transmission tines provide looped water systems within the study area, outside of the stuN1* area and partially within the study area. The ultimate flow capacity of the three major transmission lines of 62.0 M.G.O. which greatly exceeds the needs of the study area cannot be totally committed to the area since these transmission lints serve other areas. Miami Dade Water vW Sewer Authority Meter Reader's route books were used to establish the present water usage within the area. This information is Included In the Appendix. Prior to permlt aWoval the sWle f (fadvied la Ow AppwWi xy will be completed by r r• s representative. The person in charge of the capaelty bu* accounts for the City of Mimi will monitor wW detemioe if there is adequate capacity available for the proposed land use. If capacity is avail a mit will be issued and the capacity *i be debitted by the projected demand. i ti, l are built the capacity bards account will or so =Mt of increase in cavity. L �t. The person in charge of the capacity bank carefully and will year's capacity available before on average a years time span is water or sewer extensions. account bank will monitor the be required to have at least one issuing additional permits since required for the construction of Currently the City's Fire Department is performing flow test prior to approval of a new water installation. If the actual growth requires more rapid expansion than anticipated and capacity reserves are decreasing rapidly then construction 'projects will have to be accc',,rate to meet the increasing future demands. The person in charge of monitoring the capacity bank accounts will have to coordinate with Miami Dade Water and Sewer Authority, the Fire Department and City of Miami's Dept of Public Works to establish the criteria for new water and sewer line extensions within a feasible time frame to make up for deficiencies used by previous projects. SOLID WASTE There are no existing or anticipated future disposal sites within the downtown study area. The area is served by the Central Transfer Station located outside the study area as shown on Map I. Anticipated future increases for the three Growth Scenarios are included in a Table in the Appendix. The station was opened in May of 1978 and had a design capacity of 1,200 tons per day. Due to increase of demand the station was modified and have expanded its daily capacity by 33%. The cost of this expansion was funded by the Improvement Reserve Subfund of the Solid Waste Disposal Division Operating Budget. Although the Central Transfer Station was designed to support the Resources Recovery Facility it has of necessity devoted a night Shift of transfer trailers to the South Dade Facility. This Cho on is dw to the daily and ly contractual li®itations of � Sutton will process. tom! peak volume ft #1 ft i In 00 UtUr by MUG Dade Uparsoft of Nod eisu* * orwa will be maled as neces ONVO I Failfties. a several altar t 2"t 40 60 001 fadivi lly or is combination to i go !! 1 twety of the syst".r fac t l i ti as M is atUd, *dsttng facilities can be modified, wdlcw existl StMes CAWIty un be Increased by extending their bows alWe"66 &W Increasing staff. Each al ter ti its Oftrastl - # Iftitations, and most effective lities but a 4"Imatieft of all ailtblo options will allaar the C to amen Uw necessary facroaso in capacity within a* I WSW awilgble for 1opma te when a a t t a►: r Since most of the collection and hauling of solid waste to the station is done by private hauling companies, on contract basis, funding for purchasing of additional trucks to accommodate development tAll not be required. The person in charge of capacity bank accounts will have the responsibility to coordinate between Dade County Solid Waste Department and the City of Miami's Solid Waste Department for the proper planning of anticipated needs. By using the statistical data f"r -01 2 n7catcl �ccount for. s included in the Appendix the bank accounts can be credited or debitted accordingly for every new project. Dade County Department of Solid Waste will be notified in advance if accelerated development is anticipated and measures will be taken to accommodate growth. • • r-TIR ''4 t cr r 3) SPECIFY REGULATORY AND PERMITTING CHANGES NEEDED TO ENSURE THAT DEVELOPMENT IS PERMITTED ONLY WHEN FACILITIES ARE AVAILABLE. REGULATORY MD PERMITTING CHANGES Present building code requirents and county standards have been very sucessful in monitoring growth. Both Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Authority Department and the city of Miami Fire department trill oat issue core truc�i,on.,oerinits ,on`,water., artd._,sexer f)jne exLe'nsions -'unless. adegdd-te water . and "sew'-er`�• capacities are available. If capacities are not adequate the developer is obligated to upgrade the transmission lines to conform to the authorities standards. Similarly, the Fire Department will not allow any new buildings to receive certificate of occupancy unless the required fire flow is available. The present regulatory and permitting standards are adequate to permit development only when facilities are available and can assure that development will not occur unless all required criteria is met. A facilities unused capacity monitoring form as proposed and included in the Appendix can be made a part of the permit process to be completed by the developer or his representative. The completed form would be forwarded to the Building Official with the responsibility of monitoring unused capacity. .With predetermined usages, milestones and time frames based on unused capacity, the monitoring official would be alerted to the Upending need for facilities improvements. LIST nF RMIRArnRv rnnrq Qun ARnTuaurrc- Dade County Code Chapter 24 Dade County Code Chapter 33D South Florida Water Management Volume IV Niami Dade Water and Sewer Authority City of Miami Code Chapter 22 f._ HAZARDOUS MATERIALS/WASTE OF 6) SPECIFY THE QUANTITIES AND TYPES OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS USED WITHIN PLAN BOUNDARIES, AND DESCRIBE CURRENT HAZARDOUS WASTE HANDLING AND DISPOSAL PRACTICES. ALSO, SPECIFY THE QUANTITY AND TYPES OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. Solid waste generated by development will be considered of domestic and office building Qenerated waste. However, a small amount of hazardous waste may oe generated by development. Hazardous waste is defined by U.S. Environment Protection Agency and the State as waste that is ignitable, corrosive, reactive or toxic. A list of potential Hazardous Waste Generator by SIC Code is included in the Appendix. These list are experpts from the Florida Water Quality Assurance Act regulation and all facilities that fall within there SIC are required by the Act to provide information regarding types and amounts of waste generated at the facility and how this waste is being managed. Several of the SIC codes hazardous waste generators listed may be found in the downtown study area. For example research and development labs, photo finishing labs which are potential small quantity hazardous waste generators. Current hazardous waste handling and disposal practices include the use,of covered loading areas which exclude rainwater, the construction of impervious floors (without drains) which slope towards catch basins or depression for detention and clean up of spills. In addition all hazardous materials are required to be handled, by law, by a licensed private hauling contractor. In the event that a negligible amount of waste is mixed with solid waste Dade County will use ar private licensed hazardous r waste haul ingg compwW to properly dispose of the just*. A let" from the Assistant Director for Solid boasts disposal is Gales" In the Appendix indicating the present method of idling hazardous waste. f Cj i) INCLUDE A PROGRAM TO ENSURE THAT ALL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND WASTES ARE HANDLED, USED, STORED, AND DISPOSED OF PROPERLY, INCLUDE REQUIREMENTS FOR PRETREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS EFFLUENTS, IF APPLKABLE. The incorporation of the following measures as a condition in any development order issued will ensure proper handling of all hazardous materials: V11 aftvfripirvfdais"Mor �5lopia"tawaids';C-6iiefi basint°(vri'tfiout drains) for spill containment and clean-up for developments were hazardous materials are to be used or stored. ' 2) Impervious floors designed to collect and hold spilled materials for clean-up where hazardous materials are used. 3) Spill response plans approved by State and Labor Government Agencies. Description of emergency procedures including contacts and phone numbers; floor plans showing the location of hazardous substances. 4) Prohibit storage of hazardous wastes. 6) Prohibit the discharge of hazardous effluents to sewer systems unless adequately pretreated to meet the County standards for discharging into the sewer systems. (Chapter 24 Dade County Building Code) 6) All hazardous substances to be disposed via on approved waste disposal service meeting DER rmpirements. Documented by one of the following: a hazardous waste manifest; and a bill of lading from a bonded contractor showing shipment to a licensed nsed bazar s waste facility or a receipt of materials from a rycler. It w111 be the respomsibility of the local authorities to mmrltor management methods for hazardous waste disposal. In a/Iition a program is already established by Metro -Dade County �Martment of Solid Waste Disposal for hazardous waste mixed with to id waste. Dade County employs seven full-time waste amforcement officers` who are trained to spot and properly segregate such materials. This program has resulted• in a reduction of unauthorized hazardous waste disposal. If hazardous waste is discovered the removal of the material is handled by a licensed private contractor who is under contract with NetrooWe •� _ .� <� County to provide 24-hour on cal l , testing$ segr*ptieim. transporatation and disposal services for toxic and hasardews • waste. 8) SPECIFY REGULATORY AND PERMITTING CHANGES AND/OR RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS NEEDED TO ENSURE THAT THE PROGRAM AND REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED IN 7 ABOVE ARE IMPLEMENTED. PROGRAM AND REQUIREMENTS Require that all new businesses opening within the study area file an affidavit under penalty of perjury stating any hazardous , waste to be used in their operation at the time an occupational + license is recei v^� . Th: ;r�: ; , Zvi � wil i u_ `cr►.Gr :,�,; to bot`t the Dade County Department of Environment Regulation Management 4=: and the Department of Solid Waste which presently employ Enforcement Officers and Inspectors. The Officers and Inspectors can then inspect the premises to ensure that the listed hazardous waste mateials are disposed of properly. t license is received. This affidavit will be forwar,3ed to oot� r 14 a rROPOSED DMOPWR PR06RAM FOR DOMNTM M MIAMI DRI code"" Oe"lopeat: Land Vse Phase I Phase II Phase III 3=f: Office 1,000,000 sq.ft. 1,700,000 sq.ft. 2,800,000 sq.ft. rowe1it Office 150,000 sq.ft. 150,000 sq.ft. 150,000 sq.ft. Retafl/service 50,000 sq.ft. 100,000 sq.ft. 200,000 sq.ft. NOW 0 Rooms 500 Rooms 500 Rooms R"I&MMAI 500 Units 800 Units 1,200 Units emytntfen 250,000 sq.ft. 250.000 sq.ft. 250,000 sq.ft. Mhelesale/IrAustrial 19000,000 sq.ft. 1,000,000 sq.ft. 2,000,000 sq.ft. SEW: Office 371,000 sq.ft. 657,500 sq.ft. 1,003,500 sq.ft. Retefl/SMfce 103,500 sq.ft. 147,900 sq.ft. 194,100 sq.ft. W 500 Rooms 1100 Rooms 1100 rooms Restdontfal 4000 Units 6500 Units 9000 Units Cmention 290,000 sq.ft. 600,000 sq.ft. 600.000 sq.ft. CBD: Office 391009000 sq.ft. 4,500,000 sq.ft. 5,800,000 sq.ft. Cover t Office 1506000 sq.ft. 400,000 sq.ft. 600,000 sq.ft. Rotafl/s"ice 650,000 sq.ft. 900,000 sq.ft. 1,150,000 sq.ft. Matel 650 Rooms 650 Rooms 1,750 Rooms PAINIntfal 1000 Units 1800 Units 2,820 Units COWMtfon 250,000 sq.ft. 250,000 sq.ft. 500,000 sq.ft. V161e541e/1" tstrial 50,000 sq.ft. 50,000 sq.ft. 100,000 sq.ft. lastftutforial 300,000 sq.ft. 300.000 sq.ft. 600;000 sq.ft. Attractfons/Recreation 3,400 Seats 5,000 Seats 10,000 Seats Brtckd1l Office 3/0009000 sq.ft. 4,500,000 sq.ft. 5,800.000 sq.ft. ROW I/Smfce 3500000 sq.ft.. 450,000 sq.ft. 600,000 sq.ft. Meth 350 Rooms 350 Rooms 350 Rooms lOMttfal 26050 Units 3,500 Units 5,000 Units STATISTICAL DATA - SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SOURCE • WASTE GENERATION COMMERCIAL CLASSIFICATION BUILDING TYPES gUANTITIES OF WASTE PRODUCED Industrial Buildings Factories/Warehouses Survey must be made/2 lbs. per 100 sq.ft. per day Commercial Buildings Office Buildings 1 lb. per 100 sq.ft. per day Department Stores 4 lbs. per 100 sq.ft. per day Shopping_Centers. study of^plans or survey _ _ • Supermarkets 9 lbs. per 100 sq.ft. per day Restaruants 2 lbs. per meal per day Drug Stores 5 lbs. per 1007 sq.ft. per day Banks Study of plans or survey required Grade Schools 10 lbs. per room & 1/4 lb. per pupil per day High Schools 8 lbs. per room & 1/4 lb. per pupil per day Universities Survey required Institutions Hospitals 8 lbs. per bed per day Nurses or Interns Homes 3 lbs. per person per day Homes for Aged 3 lbs. per person per day Rest Homes 3 lbs. per person per day Hotels, Etc. Hotels - 1st Class 3 lbs. per room & 2 lbs. per veal per day Hotels - Medium Class 1 1/2 lbs. per room & 1 lb. per meal per day Motels 2 lbs. per room per day Trailer Camps 6 to 10 lbs. per trailer per day Miscellaneous Veterinary Hospitals Study of plans or survey required Industrial Plants Municipalities RESIDENTIAL WASTE GENERATION Tons generated per household per year three (3) 3.6 cubic yards per ton (garbage) 7.4 cubic yards per ton (trash) OIMNSIONS RE Utz IREDTO PROVIDE SERVICE ®111 dt Sac _ :' 1/2 Radlip r M s11�' `t& r c 10,-x'-10a• `r .3 L. �. 0114ENSIONS Of STERS +rr 1 cubic yard rear loader 5' 6" long, 2 ft. 4" wide, 3' 9 1/2 high" 2 cubic yard rear loader 6'6" long, 4 ft. 5" wide, 3' 11 1/2 high" 4 ob AVERAGE DAILY FLOWS FOR CONNECTIONS TO SEWERAGE SYSTEMS TYPE OF ESTABLISHMENT RESIDENTIAL GALLONS PER DAY (GPD) Single Family 350 (GPD/Unit) Townhouse . . 250 " Apartment . . 200 Mobile Home . . . 300 " Duplex or Twin Home . . 250 " COMMERCIAL Barber Shop . . . 10/100 (GPD/S.F.) Beauty Salon or Hair Boutique 200 (GPD/Chair) Bowing Alleys (Toilet Wastes Only) . 100 (GPD/Lane) Dentist Offices a) per dentist 250 (GPD/Dr.) b) per Net Chair and 200 (GPD/Chair) Doctor Offices (per doctor) a 250 (GPD/Dr.) Full Service Restaurant (350 GPD Min.). 50 (GPD/Seat) Bar and Cocktail Louge 15 (GPD/Seat) Fast Food Restaurant (350 GPD Min.) 35 (GPD/Seat) Take -Out Restaurant (350 GPD Min.) . 50/100 (GPD/S.F.) Hotels and Motels 0 0 200 (GPD/Room) Laundries, self-service o 0 w 0 a 0 400 (GPD/Washer) Office Building 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 10/100 (GPD/S.F.) Service Stations 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 10/100 (GPD/S.F.) Shopping Centers 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 10/100 (GPD/S.F.) Stadiums, Race Tracks, Ball Parks a 0 0 3 (GPD/Seat) Stores, without Food Service 0 0 a a . 10/100 (GPD/Seat) Theaters a) Indoor, Auditoriums. 0 0 0 0 3 (GPD/Seat) b) Outdoor, Drive-ins . 0 0 a a 5 (GPD/Space) Camper or Trailer Parks 0 w 0 0 0 150 (GPD/Space) INDUSTRIAL Factories (exclusive of industrial wastes) without showers . with shovers Airports . . 0 • . • p1YfCheS • • • • Nospi tal s Masieg, Rest Imes . • Parks Public PiaNc b) with o toilets g s aid toilets ► olic institutions other the hospitals (Jail, Boarding School, atc.) School . . 0 . Swimming and bathing facilities, public Warehouse/Industrial-Speculation Bldg. ' ►°== Storage Warehouse or Nial-Warehouse 10/100 (GPD/S.F.) . 20/100 (GPO/S.F.) 5 (GPD/Passawger) ad 10 (OwEsployee) S (GWS"t) • M (i"d) • ISO (Ow ) • 0 0 5 (VD/Person) • 0 0 10 NPD/Per ) . 0 10D (GPD/Person) 10 (GPD/Person) 10 (GPD/Persm) 5/100 (GWS.F.) M/ M (WWS.F.) a - DOWNTOWN DRI WATER AND SEWER CONSUMPTION TABLE ROUTE NO. WATER CONSUMPTION (100 C.F.) SEWER CONSUMPTION uarterly Monthly Average Monthly Average Ol 9451 Am 01 01 10095 8289 3160 2528 1 01 10082 -- ,..., ._.02 02 5030 4558 1660 1328 02 4806 02 5478 03 03 4170 2911 1332 1066 03 _ .4022 , - 03 4765 04 04 8178 6476 2480 1984 _= 04 8106 04 7002 05 05 4034 4790 1442 1154 05 4240 a� 05 4240 -77 21 21 7122 7860 2663 2131 21 8210 21 $768 24 24 $240 802 430 305 24 8730 24 7365. v997 3045 m 27 2926 27 2764 4291 im I EA i ROUTE NO. 29 29 29 29 32 32 32 32 479 479 479 479 480 480 480 00 *I 461 481 42 4t1 Ott Ott Ott r 3 493 43 484 484 04 464 Ms ss 49s *9 09 469 489 Page 2 WATER CONSUMPTION (100 C.F.) SEWER CONSUMPTION uarterl Monthly Average Monthly Average 10158 3502 2802 1082211 12210 116 1444416 "6S 3732 13728 12622 505 379 379 255 204 969 1211 1052 1234 406 325 34 1341 1242 4298 3707 1319 toll 4063 3T98 Nis s gm 4w l411t its! 404 4w 4972 4123 1573 1259 23 4m 36m >1� M3 ti3t flit 7064 this 2103 9628 8039 Page 3 � ROUTE N0. WATER CONSUMPTION (100 C.F.) SEWER CONSUMPTION k uarterl'y Monthly Average Monthly Average 806 20140 806 21669 806 22760 806 21280 ? SOS V.03 • 606 ;221A 26671 2OS37 806 22177 ' 806 20259 806 23502 806 21448 806 21765 814 93574 - 814 89781 814 96226 814 87930 _- $14 90875 _ $14 87088 91460 7310 •14 91713 •14 95318 $14 wwo iw hi m - Ism am _ 90 "m rii 1lMt Ili 9171 S16 12049 816 10588 Ali 10573 um sm IN~ mom imam r� u met CID: UICKEIt: E1 A WATER MWIJEJUM ON iig M.Tl1_ SCENARIOS I PHASE II PHASE III ._ GPO GPD Office 100*= 170,000 280,000 Mull f urviq some 10,000 20,000 NOW 41- 120,000 180,000 fldtitl�d�ellAl loom 160,000 240,000 C44Rtt1tWa ' gaols"1011 Inlaid loom 50,0M 100,000 office 310.000 450,000 930,000 Goverowt ISO= 40,000 60,000 but 1 f url slow 90,000 115,000 NOW 104.00 230.000 300,000 ftstdowtial mom 460,000 664,000 Wverttf40 leap" 12,500 25,000 l 0"1 Wafto gal :•o" 21500 59000 AIEractfon /FacnWas loom 15,000 30,000 Office 450,000 580,000 Rdrtsf 1�lKv/q �.� 45,000 60,000 NOW Tejo 70,000 170,000 b:i t -Otis700,000 10000,000 MAL 39477.500 4,4919500 _ 3 • KC, 4�, BRICKELL: #'Moore A I.] CONSUMPTION JM ON KW M SCENARIOS PHASE I PHASE II PHASE III �ANp IISE GPO GPD GPD OfffEt 80.000 1369000 244,000 Retail/Service 40000 8,000 16,000 Hotel -06 96,000 1441,000 Resf djatial $00000 128,000 192,000 Convqofon 10o000 10,000 10,000 Nhol "l a/ladmWiN 40 g000 40,000 90,000. Offfgo. 248.000 360,000 464,000 Government 0f"@* 120000 32,000 48,000 RetagiiService S2.000 72,000 92,000 Hotel) 1449000 184 ,000 240,000 Resfdptf&I 2409NO 3681,000 531,200 Convwf on 100000 10,000 20,000 N4iol ele/1"" rid 29000 2,000 4,000 Attr aStf ons/pecratlM 80160 12,000 24,000 Of°f f er 2409000 360,000 464,000 Retail/Service 289000 36,000 48,000 Notell 56,000 S6,000 136,000 Residential 328,000 $600000 _800,000 TOTAti 19714 6160 10782 0000 39585,200 14, PROJECTED 50ttp 1a1:1t OtlR'AATION INCREASE tlt$,IW N�lf _ LAND USE PDX I Ilbe./aer 4 1 PMASE 11 1118./Nr dat►► PHASE III (lbs./Per day) 'MINI Office 10,000 170000 28,000 Retail/Service to= 49000 8,000 Hotel 00• 3,000 4,000 Residential 89300 139350 20,000 Convention 2,500 29500 21500 Wholesale/Industrial 400000 400000 400000 `BD: Office 31,000 456000 589000 Government Office 10,500 409000 609000 Retail/Service 26.000 368000 46,000 Hotel 4 g500 56750 7 ,500 Residential 258000 mom 559350 Convention tow t,500 5,000 Wholesale/Industrial 26000 20000 4,000 Attractions/Recreation 39000 30000 60000 °RICKELL: Office 30.000 450000 930000 Retai I /Service 149000 119000 249000 Hotel 19760 19750 3,400 Residential 341,150 ld.3'JO 83,350 TOTAL DAILY GENERATION 235 9M Us, 3?5,5S1 1b5 S131,600 lbs. 4 1 PROPOSED FACILITIES UNUSED CAPACITY MONITORING FORM APPLICANT'S NAME: APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: .PROPERTY ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED USE: TOT& GROSS BUILDING FLOOR AREA: PERCENT OF BUILDING USED FOR RESIDENTAL % COMMERCIAL % INDUSTRIAL x USAGE OR GENERATION = GFA[ (RP x RF) + (CP x CF) + (IP x IF) ] WATER USAGE _ ( )[( x ) + ( x ) + ( x )] _ SEWAGE GENERATION • ( )[( x ) + ( x ) + ( x )] SOLIDWASTE A GENERATION ■ („ i [ (_ x r) + (x ) + ( x „_) ] LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS GFA - Gross Floor Area of Development in Square Feet RP - Percentage of Gross Floor Area Devoted to Residential Usuage or Occupancy CP - Percentage of Gross Floor Area Devoted to Commercial Usage or Occupancy IP - Percentage of Gross Floor Area Devoted to Industrial Usage or Occupancy RP - Residential Usage or Generation Factor - see notes below CP - Commerical Usage or Generation Factor - see notes below IF - Industrial Usage or Generation Factor - see notes below NOTES: 1) The Usage or Generation Factors are obtained from the appropriate Generation or Usage Chart. 2) Water Usage Factor is in Gallons per -day Square Foot 3) Sewage Unetition Fzktoe�is ;in Gallo�hs pkr day pier Square Fact _ r' 4) Solid Waste Generation Factor is in Pounds per day per Square Foot 5) Where two or more Usage or Generation Factors are applicable, a weighted average Usage or Generation Factor shall be used. 86-84S Mason rrsm is i ib oirrr%s ..- 4 04 METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA r August 12, 1966 METRO•DADE CENTER PUKlC WORKS DEPARTMENT SUITE 1610 III N.W. 1sl STREET MIAML FLORIOA 23126.1970 375-3997 Mr. Ted Platon, Project Engineer Williams. Russell and Johnson, Inc. 100 North Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 2100 Miami, Florida 33132 Re: Downtown Miami DRI Study Dear Mr. Platon: Thank you for your interest in Dade County's solid waste disposal system. Countywide our system is capable of handling over 36,000 tons of waste per week. This is accomplished with a coordinated system of transfer stations and disposal sites. There are no existing or anticipated future disposal sites within the downtown area. This area is served by the Central Transfer Station. Future growth of this area can be handled by: 1) expansion of the existing transfer station; 2) building a new transfer station at another location; or 3) re -defining the present service area. Alternatives 1 and 2 would require land commitments by the City of Miami which have not been obtainable in the past. In any event, as the area's growth rate wakes it necessary, the disposal service will be available via transfer station(s) of adequate capacity to serve the area. I hope this information has been helpful to you. Please do not hesitate to cntact this office if you have any further inquiries. Sincerely, Joseph A. Ruiz, Jr. - Z: Assistant Director for Solid Waste Disposal JAB/JMM/db im r2L. A METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA 01���, �r METRO•DADE CENTER PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT SUITE 1610 itt N.W. 1st STREET • MIAMI, FLOAIDA 33128.1970 375-3997 • ­Aukust 28,' 1986 Mr. Ted Platon, Project Engineer Williams, Fussell and Johnson, Inc. 100 North Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 2100 _.Miami, Florida 33132 Dear Mr. Platon: This is in response to your question regarding hazardous waste. Dade County's Solid Waste Disposal Division does not generate or accept toxic waste, however, small amounts of toxic waste may be inadvertently mixed with the waste stream upon occassion. To minimize any problems that could result from unauthorized deliveries, we have instituted a Waste Enforcement Officer (WEO) Program. We employ seven full time WEO's who are trained to spot and properly segregate such material. .This program has resulted in the practical elimination of such incidents. Should an incident arise, however, the removal of the material would be handled by a licensed private contractor who is under contract with Metro -Dade County to provide 24-hour, on -call, testing. segregation, transportation and disposal services for toxic and/or hazardous wastes. I hope this information is helpful to you. Please do not hesitate to 'contact this office if you have any further inquiries. Sincerely, / oseph A. 4dz, Jr. Assistant Director for `Solid Wastr Disposal JAR/JMK/db _ LIST OF POTENTIAL. HAZARDOUS WA CENERATORS IT SIC CODE* wsote Types seseripties OIIS-t►ttl: ACRICOiM ASC Curs ABC Cottam ABC Tobacco +:1C Sugor Crops elC vegetable and Woos Tsrs>trs hoc Derry Crops wit titres Fruit Cowers K Ornamental Tloricrttere ► Nursery Products .JIG General Fares. primarily Crop ,K Seat Cattle Feedlots A.0 seat Cattle, except Feedlots (e.I., Roselle•) AsC oweep'and Cost farms ABC General Livestock ABCT Soil Preparation Services AKT Crop Ptostiat, Cultivation, and Protection LPWT Crop Narveat€nt. Primarily by Machine T Callas Cianiet AT General Crop Services A Livestock Services. except Services for AMUGI Speeiatities A Laos and Carden Services -AT Orsomesttat throb and Tree Services 0S11-0851: POREMY ABC Timber.^Tracts AK Forest-ftrsrriee i Tree Seed Gotheriog txttecting ASCT Ferestcr cervices 1611•ITIV: COWSTIVC11 ON LPM Righstag and Street Construction LPWV Sridgt; Towel. and Elevated lillfwap Cometeeetiea PT P1061111, Nesting (except electric) and Air C 04i"tioning JKLT Painting, Paper Imagist, 04 oetoratist, Messy Constructions NEC IT Terrstso. Tile. Itarile. and ""sit Work JOLT Floor Laying sod Ot►er Floorwork, NEC destry Not boes identified as a potestiai generator of Astardees was cols abet the industry may generate corrosive, reactive. ignitable. acic wastes. For example. SIC cede 0711. Soil preparation Services. �ntisl generator of tosic pesticide castes. toeb SIC code listed in fist previously bean documented is the literature as a potential. . • r at besardous waste. �� elsetAtere claasitisd ' SIC Waste Types Description Code 1761 LT Noofins and Sheet `fetal Work lit) LT Class and clsting vat% 1794 LPWT Excavating and Foundation York 1799 JKLPWT Special Tradt Contractors • ]0)+•)R99 MANUFAC211-41W, IMP13ST111tS 20)! canned Specialties 2M1 Canned and Cord Filh and Seafoods 2231 173 Dread Woven fahric dills, Wool 2251 LM Wootns roll Length and Knee Notiery 22S2 LM NOsier7. except voarn's Full Length • Knot Langtt* 2251 LN Knit Outerwrar Milli 2254 LM Knit 11"Jervesr Milts 2257 LM Cirevlar Knit Fshric mills 2258 LY Warp Knit Fabric "1119 2259 LM Knittins Mills. Atc 2261 LM finishera of )toad 'Woven Fabrics of Cdtten 2262 LN Finishers of 3roa4 'Woven Fabrics of ►tin -Made Fiber and Silk 2269 Lay Finishers of Droad Woven Fabrics. Man -Made fiber and Silk 2271 LM Woven Carptt+ and >tuga 2212 1.11 Tufted Carpets end Rugs 2279 L4 Carpets and 4v41. MEC 2414 JKLT Wood Kitchen eahinets 2435 JKLT Nar4wood Venert and plywood 2416 JKLT Softwood Vrnt#r and Plywood 2451 JKLT Mobile Moses 2452 JKLT Prrfabricsted Wood luildinss and Compoments 2491 N Wood Preservist 2492 LTY Particleboard 2$11 JKL4T Wood Nouseholal Furniture. *leapt Upholstered 2514 NLOPQ Metal Household Furniture 2517 JKL`iT Wood TV slid Radio Cahinets 2519 JKL4T Household Furniture, NEC 2521 JKL`1T Wood Office furniture 2522 "OF Metal Office turlitvrt 2541 JKLMT Wood Psrtitions and fistvres 2542 NVg0FQ Metal Partitions and fixtvree 2611 LMFTT pulp Mill* 2621 LMPT1 Paper 'hills. t+cept lvildint Paper Mills 2611 LMPTT Paperboard Milts 2641 ILP Paper Costint •lid Clawing 2641 ILP salts. Except Tpatil! lama 2"s UP Die -cut Pager end paperboard and CardboarJ 2646 ILP Pressed and Wolfed pulp roads 264 9 ILP Converted paper and Paperbosrd frodocts, NEs' 2651 ILP Folding Paperboard Roses 2652 ILP Set-up ►aperboord loses 2653 UP Corrugated and Solid fiber Buses NEC a Not elsevhere classified MEM r �Iloate hoeatii�itoo SIC Waste Types Dtseriofjan Type. Code — ............. Seaitat Teal Container% M II L hots • shop CvltStncet a findings tLPY IL" fiber bona, Ta►ta. Oraat. and Similar protects 7191 IISA L L Leather Cloves,l,rNitrpns Lumen's :ootv.at, esc•pt Athletic ,i. AVWTT Soildi%g Paper and Suitding Board Mills L "n,I •— ARILOPQ p#vspapert- Publishing and Printing Periodicals. Publishing a Printing WIlifil 711a L wowpe" MandDaaa ` Puraea ANMOPQ AR7LOPQ t400ks:r-Publishing sod Printing 117! 7199 L L Personal Lpat,,tr,Ce04. Leather Cnods, WC ,. ANILOPQ ARttAPQ `oak Ptintirit` Coanserciat Printing. Letterpress sod Screen 1t11 1251 Ft JKL flat Class frith and Str,e;l•erat flay 'file ARtLOPQ CaaaaerEiot Printing. Lithographic )±S) •JKL Ceramic Walt )r�.l'loor Tile ASILOPQ Eagrawing aid Plate Witting l±sl JKL Vitreous China„Numbing Tistures and sattiruasa AAtLOPQ commercial printing. Gravure Accessories. - + ARILOPQ Manifold extineee Forms )±yj JKL Vitrpoua China .7ab1• and Witch•" Articl+• A11ILOPQ Creetint Card Publishing tinder*, and Devices 1263 JKL Fine Earthpnvat ,+chit+Marpl Table a Kitchen ASTLOPQ stank►ooks. Looseieaf Articles t,+ AN)LOPQ tookbtnding•end Related Work 72SA JKL Porcelain Elecilital Suoplies ANILOPQ Tyiesetting• • )±ti9 JKL Pottery /radutt+•, `+tC At Alkalies and Chlorine );91 t Abrasive Prod,#i.0 Leo"tnorganie Pigments )±9) LT Cast.ets, Pactip,t,and Sealing Devices VFOPQRST tnduttiial Inorganic Chemicals. NEC ))12 Y •last Pur"ace9.13te•1 Wnrks, and Roll€ng M€11s AI,IRY plastics. Mstertals. Synthetic Resiaa. sad 771) T Electromptallvr;trai ►rodurta A Noo•vulcrnitable Elastamers - ills Y Steel Wire Dra••ing and Stp•r Nails and Spikes LIM Synthetic Robber ))lb V Cold Rolled Stt�l Short, Strip, and Oars ALK" Cellulosic Ks" -Made Fibers Synthetic Organic Fibers, except Cellmle$ie Till T Steel Pipe and jubps Iron fou21T. s ALHTY ))±1 Y Cray tliologieat Products Y 4alleahle lron,{ooniries Nedicinsts end tlotanicala ))±S V Steps foundriar,.Ntf LP Pharmaceutical Preparatione Speeislity 7772 T Primar. Sa•iti�a.and iorinint of Lead AFtllii Sosp sit other Detergents. except 7113 T Primary Sa•a•lti"c and a.f1nengt of 11"c Ar ALMM Cleitne[a Specialty Cleaners. Polish@$. and Sanitation 7134, 31j9 T T Primary PrcdurJ,lan lit %1,iminum ►rimary Smwltjpr� and Werening of Nonferrous at Preparstions Metals, 'RTC FURY Surface Active Ageate, finishing Agents. ))AI T Seconder. SVwI1;+,o3 and ttrrinint of No"te►r.me ' Sutfoeated Oils, and Assistant• Metals It , TLTV Perfumes. Cosmetics, and Other Toilet Preparations 3351 II0MY. Roiling, Drovi,.., and tatruding at Copper s I.ftLm Paint'and'Altied Products 7153 NL'tt»Qt aluminum Shppl t.Tla:e and T,,+l IUWTY rV Cue slid hood Chesicate Cytlie,(Coal Tier) crudes. tad Cyclic laterme/sate$. 7ISi NLNOPQY Aluminum vd Eatr,rd Products Aluminuq Rolli,aR a"d Vfl"i"gq, RtC Dyiti, and Organic Pigments (Leltes and Tontts) 7155 3156 NLMOPQY NL?MPQT Rolling, Dravippt.and taTrud+n!y Of 10"ferrous .tLXM 11"Vi mat Organic Chemical$, NEC Mpta1, EsCTVI Copo•t and Aluminum Nitrogenous Fertilitere 7357 "My Drawing and 1n,alatint or Nonferrous Wire .; I.ASCLIR pesticide attd Agricultural ClttmitaUa N1;C 1761 Y Aluminum 70.1n41,its (Csstings) + Adhesives and Sestsnts 7762 V Brass. and Copper Oast Allow Eaplosives roundrits , �nArFiiLNP �•• Printing Ink 7169 T "3nferrous Tolerjrips (Castings), NEC ha.�pPtY .• Chemical Prtparatlea$ ))98 NLMOPMY petal Meet Tref,li"p tra•Y Petroleum Wining 1199 NLMt+PQT Primary Metal.,j•tuducts, Wyk p° i• .nttry t h•Y Asphalt felts end Castings Labritating Oils anal CPNsea 1411 141± NLMtt►QY NVtO►QY Metal Cana ptal Shippi.jn aeta, Drums. Refs. and Pail• Nn•1e, Cc Cc ^r T Products of Petroleum sad Cost. NSt fOrue Refinithing) p AW ltistellsnataes Plastic Nedects 14±1 NIJh►1'Q Crtlp.r t L Leather tanning sad Fimisbiml NEC p Not elmesrhere classified Not elsewhere Classified waste Types Dperri►4ien NllIDPQr Nand "#,Use Tools. Except Machine Tools and . Nand(.$ays NLMDPQ4 Megd San i Sew glade* NIltOPQ[. Nordwor . NEC . NLMOPQ EneselerIron slid Metal Sanitary Were Nl1torm Plusbing Fixtere Fitting* and Trio Mass Coods) NLMDPQ! Nestingrhgaipawnt, except Electric slid Waro Air rwmtgee NLMDPQT Fabricated Structural Metal NL"OPQT Metal QQQrs. Sesh. Frames. Moldings. and Trios NLMOPQT Fabricated Plate Work NLMOpv Sheet Modal dark KNOW Architst,�vral •and ornseental Metal work NLIMPQT Prefsbr4tated;F9rta1 building* and Compoststs MLMDPQT Misceltopeove Metal Work NLMOPQT Screw Machine products NLMKT salts. tests. Screws. Rivets. and Washers NLRDPQT Iron aryt,.Steel Forging$ NLMOPQT Autosot4ve Steeping$ NutoPQY Net.al S4ampinRg. NEC NLMOPQT Electroplating. Polishing, Plating. As"isittg. and .Ctoloring NLMOPQr CostilltnXngroving. and Allied Services. NEC Small Asa Ammunition 1lsatunit.iot. except for Small Arse, NEC OrdnancA,,*nd Accessories. NEC !'Q Steas..448. and Nydrsulic Turbines NIJMPW leterns.;,„Cookustion Engines. NEC NMMT Fars lfaghinerj and Equipaent MLMOPQT Garden .,factors 6 Lawn S Carden Equipment NLMPQT CorittrIVtJoa Machinery and tgaipoeat NMPQr lllining.Pochinery and Equipment. except oil Pield NIM MY oil rieM Machinery and Egaipent InnoPQ Conwtyqp, and Cenvejing Equipment a NLMDPQT. IndustriAt Tracks. Tractors. Tfailers. and Scsc.�rs NLMOPQT M*ehise Toela. Metal Lattisg NLRO►QT Machinae;pols..Metot Forelag NLMOPQT fpecialr,Oies slid Tools. Die Sets. ]igs sad Fist#045.. and ladvotrial Notda MADPQT Machine -.Tool Accessories S Neasuriag bevices NLMOPQT Power Dr vea Mand Tools NLMOPQT Metal vorking Machinery. NEC ••NLXDM Food Products Machinery , • NL.MDPQT Textile_ftschinery 66 NLNDPQT WoodworJ411K Machinery t NL.MPQr NLitIIPQT Paper tndaetr.€es machinery Printing, Trade* Meehieery and Squipeat �y NLMDPQT Special Andustry Machinery. NEC NE M1PQT Pu**e end Pwping Equipment N1.MOPQY bell and, Roller bearings V Sic Waste Types Descripfieef,. Code 3561 NLMnPQ Air and Cos Co*p{ptsors 356: NL`NtPQ Nlnver and Eshau4tSVentilatinn fans )Soil NLMOPOY Industrial Prucegs,r►urnace 6 Owens IS6g 110%)MY MOch4nicol Power Transmission tquipment. Nrc 3569 )171 NlJtOPQY Ce"Orat lndustria'i,Marhinery and tqulpw.nt NEr HLrtO►Q Electronic Compel in; Equipment 357: MLMOPQ Calculating 4 Accodntinc Karhinaq, •Rcepf Electronic Equipment 3574 NLMO►Q Office Machines, 41af- 3$62 NLMtrPQY Cox—rcial Laund+ro Dry Claming, and P►esltnR Machines . ri lies NLMnPQ Air Conditioning .and Mary Air MratinR Equipment and Coa+merciair 4(?d Industri4l RrfriRerstinw Equipment .r. 1596 NL40PQ Measuring and Ditpenaing Puarps 3189 HLMOPQ Setvice industry 'jarhinc•s, NEC )S92 HLMOPQY Carburetors, Pistnns, Piston Rings 4 Valve, 3599 NIanPQY Machinery, EstePtr'llettrisal, MEC 1-112 HL`tOPQY Pnver, DistrihatuW1 and Specialty Transforwmr4 IF,1). HLMOrQ Svitchtear and SMi,tchboard Apparatus 1621 HLMOPQ Me -tors i Cener4taa}- 1622 HLMOPQ Indnstriol CorrttrwLq )62) NLMOPQ Welding ApparatueptElectrie 3624 NI.Y(1rQ Carbon i Ctsphitei iroducts 36.19 HI.MOPQ Electrical lndustVirat Apparatus, NEC 1612 RL40PO Household Refrix*.rators and Howe and Fates Freetrrs 1634 HL40PQ Electric Mousevas"s and Fans 3436 HLMOPQ Swing, Machines ,nr 1619 NLMOPQ Household Appliantq%. MEC )641 NLMOPQ Electric Lamp. .11 164) HLMOPQ Current-CarryingAtxire Devices 1645 RLMOPQ Residential Electric Lighting F€atures 1646 NLMOPQ Commercial, Induot vial, and Institutional Lighting Firt:tr..s 3647 NLMOPQ Vehicular Lighting,3s.q.rirawnt 35S1 MLMnPQ Radio ` Television, Receiving Sets )6S2 HLMOPQ PhnnoRraph RecordM 4nd Pre-rrcorde4 Magnetie Tape 3662 NL40PQ Radio and Televis.irs ?ransaAittin SiRnalinR, and Detection Equi,pgent and Apparatus )67i N WPQ Semiconductors 4n. r#elated Devices 1675 HLMOPQ Electronic Capecitwel 3677 NLMOPQT Electronic C0t1911tTr4n1f,3Mff1. and Other Inductors 1679 ML14O►Q Electronic Cosponegts, NEC 1691 HPQW Storage batteries 3692 HPQ Primary 34tteriew.p,ory and Wet 1111 Nntor Vehicles Car Bodies )714 NLMOPQY Motor Vehicle Part;+, and Accessories )716 NLMnPQ Motor Homeq )711 MI.MOPQ Aircraft t r 1114 HIMOPQT Aircraft Engines and rnrine Parts )7;11 NLMOPQT Aircraft Parti and Auailiery Equipment. Me :€ elseaAnete classified NEC • Not elsnrhrrr classified waste Types Dr- Description P 1 NLPMPQV •Sbie•puilding and Repairing 2 KMPQT •.11estgfailding and Repairing t NL210PQ Ewgi'teriwg. Scientific. Laboratory and Research �e� a t rttwent a 2 NIMOPQ Asttlmptic Controls for Regulating Residential and ;oawerelat tavironwents and Appliances MWOPQ ....Iudustrial tnetrow"ts for Nessuring. Display, and • ep$trol of process Variables. and Related r 1'Ipdvcts r NLMOPQ Tot%ifcing Plaid Meters and Counting Devices r NLMOPQ .IRslgpeents for Meseuriag and Testing of r tfsetricity and Eleetrie Signals ^, r NLMOPQ Mea rlties and Controlling Devices, NtC 2 r NLMOPQ Opt *1 Instrumrwta and Lenses i N(1PQ LM Borah ei and Medical Inetrovents Red Apparatus 2 RLttOPQ Ort%ppedic, Prosthetic. and Surgical Appliances At4d Supplite 1 NL1tOPQ OewSsl Equipment and Supplies 1 NLROPQ ophtbPlmic Goode t NLMOPQ PhoE4grophic Equipment and Supplies l NLMOPQ Wsts, fs. Clocka, etc. i NLJIOPQT JewttTy. Precious metal - KLMOPQT ..Silverware. Plated Were. and Stainless Stool Mare S NJLMOPQ .•Jewf.ftr'e Bindings 4 Nattrials 6 Lapidary Work 1 1(JKLMPQ Coe%%Oe Jewelry and Costume Novelties. except • trocioue metal rr NJKLIIt)PQ Nee4jts, Pith, "I and tyes, and Similar r lfotions 1 IItJKLMOPQp Sigfttq.sad Advertising Displays NJ'E MPQ eurg;t Caskets t 11JRLMOPQTT Manu(actorisg Industries 4011-4959: T.!1JSPDILTATION AND PUBLIC UTILITIES I JKLTY 1R Rsi1`o049. Line-Noul Operating Lwr Locgtjond Suburban Transit ) JRLTY Switflling 4 Tertsisal tetelilishmate 1 MY Loca k,.Passenser Transportation. NEC t MY Tati"be MY latatcity and Rural Nishway Possessor Jaaspertstion I LlwT Sehoql ever$ 2 T Maif}%owanct 6 Service Facilities tot Motor vehicle tlssenger Transportstiem • 2 J¢t.P1fT .Loci Trucking without Storage • I JKLWT Trucking. Except Local h JCLPWT Loa`( Trucking with Storage if JKFTT TrWrting Terminal facilities • I JKLPWT D.St Postal Service (Vehicle Ilalstenamee Only) to I T Deep •Sea foreign Transportstistl '"1 I Moripe Cargo Noodling s AL"M ; Ivator Transportation Services. NLC • Not elsewhere classified I Stt Waste Types Description Code 4511 T Air Transporration. certifitoted earriets 4SS2 T Airports and'Flyinit rields 45111 LTV Airport Ter+sinot Services 4612 JKLPTT Crude Petroleum ►ipe Lines 4613 JKLPTV Notified ►etrdleus ripe Lines 4619 JKLPT Pipe Lines, "EC 4s11 LT Telephone Cc••-sunication (Wire or Radial .6812 LT Radio 8roadcwinR 4933 LT Television Itroadcosting 4911 T Electric Services 49)l T Electrical t Other Services 4911 V Cos 4 Other "Services 4939 V Combination utilities. NEC 4952 T Sevrrate Systest 4953 T Refuse slit—ve 49S9 Aga Sanitary Services. NEC 5093-5198- 4':.OLESALE TRADE $09) T Strap 4 Wasce Materials. Wholesale 5161 L►TY ChrmicaII u l Allied Products WholesalC, Sill A hum Supplira 5190 ALT Paints, Varnishes, and Supplies 5231-5484: •NtTAIL TRADE 5:31 JRLT r' Paint. glass• and Wallpaper Stores 5251 AJKT Hardware Stares 5;11 ALP Mobile hose (resters Slit AIJKT Department Stores $399 AIJKt Mitceltaneor,r General Merchandise Stores. Ssil LaVY Motor Vehicle beaters (New 4 Used, SS21 LPW1 Motor Vehicle. Dealers (Used Only) 5511 LPW Auto 4 Rome Suap17 Stores S5:1 LPWV 6auoline 3erv'ice Stations, detail 5551 LPWT goat Dealer% " 5571 L►WV Motort7cle cralrtt 5599 LPWT Autowntive ' %lets. NEC 5122 Nouseaold Applimnce Stores. Retail $962 LT Automatic Mrrrbandising 'tachine Opetator• $982 T Fuel 4 tee dealers 54e) T ruel Oil Dealers 5984 T Liquefied ratroleum Gas Dealers 7215-8081: UIV ICES MUSTRiE1 121S LM Coin 0V@rats La,tndrio% and Ory Cleaning 1216 LM Or• Clesnink Plant%. T'Rcept Nult Cleaning 1211 LM Carpet and t'rhnlatrry 7218 LM Industrial taunderrrn 1261 LT Funeral Services and crreatnries M l iJKLT Outdoor Advertising Srrvirrs NEC 0 Not elsewhere classified ill Idi'lill'll i .I_I II hlY[Ii �ikiliiiiGl Waste Types �tsceiptiea lJR Advertising. NEC tit Direct Mail Advertising Services LOT 911HIprist and Photocopying Services LOT Coaarreisl Photography Art. and Graphics ACV Disinfecting and Ettermination Services PRT Cleening and `laintenence Services to Ovelliage and Other Ruildings. NtC LPT Research and Development Laboratories *POST Photofinishing Laboratories LPT Commercial Testing Laboratories Fire Extinguisher Charging Services L}YY Passenger Car Rental and Leasing. vithoot Drivers MY Truck Rental and Leasing. without drivers LOW Utility Trailer and Recreational vehicle Rental LPW Top and Eody Repair Shops. Automotive LPW Tire Retreading aid Repair Shops, Automotive LOW Paint Shops, Automotive LPWT General Automotive Repair Shops LPNT Automotive Repair Shops. NEC LPT Radio E Television Repair Shops LPT Refrigeration t Air Conditioning Strviee i Repair Shops ' LPT Electrical S Electronic Repair Shops. NEC LT Watch. Clock. and Jewelry Repair JRLT Reupholetery and Furniture Repair LOW Welding Repair LT Armature Rewinding Shops LT Repair Shops and Related Services. 11w (including Taxidermists) LOT Services Allied to Motion Picture Prodectiaa JRLT Theatrical Producers (except Motion Pictures) Wad Miscellaneous Theatrical Services Aw Public Golf Courses LPT Coin -Operated Amusement Devices JRLPT Amusement Parks AX Amusement and Recreetion Services. NEC LPT General Medical and Surgical Nospitale LPT Specialty Hospitals, except Psychiatric LPT Medical Laboratories LPT Dental Laboratories LPT Outpatient Care Facilities 8211-1331: EDUCATFONAL SERviCES JRLPT Elementary and Secondary Schools JRLPT Colleges. universities. Professional Schools. and Junior Colleges JRLPTY 1locatioeal Schools. except vocational Nigh A School#. WEC 4� JRLPT Schools sad Educational Services, NEC JOLT Job Training and vocational Rehabilitatiem Serviees K elooldmre classified sic West@ Types Description , Code 6411-6999: Mi3CELL44EOUS 11411 JRLPT Iluatvas and Art Calleries 8421 ARC Arbo►ets, totanical ,nd Zoological Gardens $922 LPT Noncommercial Educational. Scientific. and Research Organitstions 1"9 A Services. NEC Ow m Met elsewhere classified CODE FOR WASTE TYPES COMMONLY ASSOCIATED WITH EACH SIC INDUSTRY - a .: Waste ,estici9es • td Washing and rinsing solutions containing pesticides C Empty pesticide containers D Spent toxaphene solutions or sludges from dipping E Spent pesticide solutions or sludges other than toxaphene from dipping F Dust containing heavy metals _ C Washings and rinsing solutions containing heavy metals N Wastewater treatment sludges containing heavy metals I Waste ink j Ignitable paint wastes containing flammable solvents (flash point less than 140'F) K Liquid paint wastes containing heavy metals (cadmium; chromium, mercury or lead) L Spent solvents M Still bottoms from the distillation of solvents N Filtration residues from dry cleaning operations 0 Cyanide wastes P Strongly acidic or alkaline wastes Q Spent plating wastes R Waste arsmonia S Photographic waistes T Ignitable wastes (flash point less than 140•F) U Wastewater sludges containing pentachlorophenol, creosote, or arsenic : p_ Waste fomaldehyde • + _ .. C • r ii_ ` Lead=ac id` gat tecfes _ • _ • —v • • " _ • " • " : ` o . '' . ► .. - X Waste explosives Y Waste oil Other M HIALEAH AND JOHN E. PRESTON WATER TREATMENT PLANTS EXPANSION PROGRAM A Present Capacity - 190 mgd Hialeah - 60 mgd Preston - 130 mgd (filter media under construction) 0 Preston Wroting (1985) - 225 mgd ' Hialeah - 60 mgd Preston - 165 mgd Raw Water - 225 mgd Softeners - 165 mgd `Filters'= 176 mcd - -` Air Stripping - 225 mgd (both plants) Reservoir 52.9 mg (available both plants) High Pressure Service 320.3 mgd (both plants) C Hialeah Upro t ing (1998) 245 mgd Hialeah - 80 mgd Preston - 165 mgd ALEXANDER ORR WATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION PROGRAM A Present Capacity - 160 mgd R W 200 aw ater - mgd Softeners - 200 mgd Filters 160 MG (media change under construction) Reservoirs 40 mg (20 mg additional under construction) High Pressure Service - 350 mgd B Fourth Addition (1988) - 220 mgd • Raw Water - 220 mgd Softeners - 230 mgd (2 softeners required) Filters - 256 mg Reservoir - 40 mg (20 mg reservoir required I M) - High Pressure Service - 350 mgd C Fifth Addition (1995) - 256 mgd Raw Water - 280 mgd (West Wellfield required) Softeners - 290 mgd (2 softeners required) Filters - 256 mg Reservoir - 60 mg (20 mg reservoir required 1997) High Pressure Service - 350 mgd n Sixth Addition (2002) - 2€ 0 mgd 'Row water - 2801m941 . -Softeners - 280 mg�i Filters - 352 mgd (fitters required) Reservoir - 80 mg .High Pressure Service - 350 mgd ■ [7 :.r +i { {, ly.: 1 :e.�=iil•r I. ; •fit 4 .�., ,.ySy `� ! .t,. w` 1 d,,, 4� ;'9 t.. n*' r 4 tk {... .. ..; t-�Re'%'Z+ ��! •fi ! r� ...f._ r '�C'r zt idl 'i..nufi��f: t.. ! .?•"i ti l: 14 1'fi' .qp• j9 p..; 7"452,y+�' ,�i' .3.. ,�,� b 5:ir i r { I!li. will ,I '.f :` ' ! it ..77i_`3A•n .� i.� b lu��.���r .,:.0 � p;:. }'<'4a.y' xa '!1 #�a L4'dr ✓'._ ;SI:!'L 'f �. ;..0 1 .,i fi'._ 4 nv n {'4: a. o l�'�',t G ir� .. ;�f ,•'� .{ h3f.' �'4 h �.'� 'tiy •�..�k'�C''' �I� �t lk �: 1 ,.d;: .?_ ,a� �„& ., � - 1 ��� � i'Ps`'' I k :,1; ��f ..e 3F � 'SXN:1✓=�• 4�+,+5$. a .1II • ..... .. m.� _...,owu,w. >__�:�:ax:..� .. ...... � .ar.w.. +1.Au��.,e n9. h L s... ,...+Y a ..v .r .. .... ... .. ...... . j'�Y >l 4r._TTN�% .. F AWER t IA I —DARE WATER and AUTHORITY DEPARTMENT too 260 240 220 G 200 ti 0: .' n 1 e o 3. Z 160 Z 140 W � 120 too so 60 40 IfT6 TT Ts 79 8o at e2 83 84 e5 86 87 as 89 90 91 92 93 94 93 96 97 98 99 20 01 02 03 04 OS YE AR ALEXANDER ORR JR. WATER TREATMENT PLANT WATER DEMAND AND POPULATION PROJECTIONS &W 19e5 :e 26 24 22 20 0 O O is o x 16 O ►- Q 14 � o. O 0. 12 10 e 6 4 fi I pdi. 'fir _ mod: i 1 t 680 t 540 500 460 Q 420 W 390 IL 0 z 340 wi t 30( Q J 2f1 221 s 10� 14 10 OD �n 1976 TT T8 T9 80 61 82 83 84 85 86 8T 98 89 90 91 arc YEAR METROPOLITAN DAD E Coun I T jut* 1985 1 1�tA1"ER DEMAt AND PLANT RATED CAPAWY do ■ ■ m - I %S%.. wept t�tAuro 0 Mc o ■■ LXANDEK VKK JK. WATLK ! KCAI Mr-M I n TER DMAAND AND WELL PERMITTED CAPA HEALTH CARE, POLICE, AND FIRE FOR EACH OF THE ABOVE PUBLIC FACILITIES/SERVICES, PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: 1) IDENTIFY THE IRIUSED SERVICE CAPACITY AVAILABLE FOd NEW DEVELOPMENT IN THE STUDY AREA DURING EACH PLAN PHASE. ALSO, SPECIFY THE SERVICE LIMIT THRESHOLDS (E.G. MAXIMUM RESPONSE TIME) FOR THE ABOVE SERVTCFS. 2) INCLUDE MONITORING PROGRAMS FOR THE ABOVE SERVICES MID ASSOCIATED FACILITIES THAT TABULATE AVAILABLE SERVICE CAPACITY, DEBIT THE "CAPACITY ACCOUNT" WHEN DEVELOPMENT IS PERMITTED, AND CREDIT THE "CAPACITY ACCOUNT" WHEN ADDITIONAL FACILITIES COME ON LINE. THE MONITORING PROGRAMS MUST ALSO INCLUDE A MECHANISM FOR DETERMINING THE NEED FOR AND TIMING OF ADDITIONAL FACILITIES AND SPECIFY THE ACTIONS NECESSARY TO FUND AND CONSTRUCT FACILITIES AS NEEDED. Health Care IDENTIFY THE UNUSED SERVICE CAPACITY AVAILABLE FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT IN THE STUDY AREA DURING EACH PLAN PHASE. ALSO, SPECIFY THE SERVICE LIMIT THRESHOLDS (E.G. MAXIMUM RESPONSE TIME) FOR THE ABOVE SERVICES. The Health Council of South Florida's 1983 Hospital Utilization Report i shows that Sub -district 3 facilities are operating at only 70.5% of licensed capacity. { R No public medical or health care facilities are planned for the Project area. The downtown area, which is in sub -district 3 of Health and Rehabilitation Services MRS) District XI, is now and will continue to be primarily served by the following facilities that are within one mile of the Project area (see map I-4): 1. Jackson Memorial Hospital 1611 N.W. 12th Avenue 1,250 beds 2. Cedars Medical Center 1400 N.W. 12th Street 700 beds 3. Victoria Hospital 955 N.W. 3rd Street �rc 300 beds } 4. Veterans Administration Hospital 1201 N.W. 16th Street 4 /08 beds z : z 8E-84` It should be noted that Jackson Memorial Hospital has a level 1 Trauma Center and two heliports as part of its facilities. This Trauma Center is the hub of a county wide Trauma Network to handle severe iniuries requiring emergency treatment. Other facilities located within Sub -district 3 include: Christian Hospital 40 beds P.L._ Woe . 39 beds Highland Park General 106 beds Anne Bates Leach 100 beds Mercy Hospital 549 beds Miami Jewish Home/Hospital 32 beds University of Miami Hospital/Clinics 70 beds Information received from the Public Health Trust and the Health Council of South Florida (see appendix ) indicates that the above facilities and their resources are more--7han adequate to serve the anticipated downtown population through the year 2005. The Project area currently experiences a 3-6 minute fire rescue/ambulance response time. This is expected to be maintained in the foreseeable future. INCLUDE MONITORING PROGRAMS FOR THE ABOVE SERVICES AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES THAT TABULATE AVAILABLE SERVICE CAPACITY, DEBIT THE "CAPACITY ACCOUNT" WHEN ADDITIONAL FACILITIES COME ON LINE. THE MONITORING PROGRAMS MUST ALSO INCLUDE A MECHANISM FOR DETERMINING THE NEED FOR AND TIMING OF ADDITIONAL FACILITIES AND SPECIFY THE ACTIONS NECESSARY TO FUND AND CONSTRUCT FACILITIES AS NEEDED. It does not appear that existing capacities will be absorbed by projected Phase I development; however, to monitor the sufficiency of health care facilities to service the growing downtown residential and employee population, the Public Health Trust and the Health Council of South Florida will be contacted annually for written updates on availability of beds and services and on health care expansion plans. They will be advised of recently approved developments as well as those expected to occur during the next year. They will be asked to indicate whether existing and proposed capacities and/or response times will be taxed by the anticipated developments and what new or improved facilities and associated costs will be required to meet new service demands. If it appears that capacities are not sufficient to accommodate further development until new or improved facilities are available the City will make further development approvals contingent on the commitment of necessary health care facilities to service the increased demand that will result from the proposed development. 86-84� P Police IDENTIFY THE UNUSED SERVICE CAPACITY AVAILABLE FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT IN THE STUDY AREA DURING EACH PLAN PHASE. ALSO, SPECIFY THE SERVICE LIMIT THRESHOLDS (E.G. MAXIMUM RESPONSE TIME) FOR THE ABOVE SERVICES. The City of Miami Police Department currently has two facilities within or adjacent to the Project area. (See Map . ) • 1. The Miami Police Station r 400 N.W. 2nd Avenue ' 2. The Overtown Mini Station 1600 N.W. 3rd Avenue Future plans include the provision of space for police facilities at the Bayside Project and/or in Bayfront Park. Although capital facilities are sufficient to meet the needs of future growth, a memo from Chief of Police Clarence Dickson (See Appendix ) _ indicated Police Officers and Civilian Personnel will have to be added to the force as new development occurs. t I To provide optimum service for the growth projected for downtown for Phase I, for which a development order is being sought, 178 police officers and 59 civilian personnel will have to be added to the force according to Chief Dickson. These estimates are based on the following ratios proposed by the Police Department. Resident Population Transient Population Civilian Personnel 3 officer/1,000 1.5 officers/1,000 1/3 officers INCLUDE MONITORING PROGRAMS FOR THE ABOVE SERVICES AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES THAT TABULATE AVAILABLE SERVICE CAPACITY, DEBIT THE "CAPACITY ACCOUNT" WHEN ADDITIONAL FACILITIES COME ON LINE. THE MONITORING PROGRAMS MUST ALSO INCLUDE A MECHANISM FOR DETERMINING THE NEED FOR AND TIMING OF ADDITIONAL FACILITIES AND SPECIFY THE ACTIONS NECESSARY TO FUND AND CONSTRUCT FACILITIES AS NEEDED. The increases in ad valorem to>: , projected in Table 10.5 that will result from downtown growth should be able to support the increase in the police force indicated by the Chief for Phase I growth. The Police Department is a participant in the City's Major Use Special Permit Process; however, Chief Dickson has requested S6. 84 Police Department in participation preliminary site plan reviews with developers also to early on accurately ascertain the impact upon the Department and its ability to provide effective and sufficient police protection and to insure security conscious structures are built and that emergency routes remain accessible. This request will be accommodated. The Future cani tal facility needs of the Department, as it grows, will be red' ized, in part, ; ► wn ii.,pact fees Char, will be assessed aysinst new developments. Fire IDENTIFY THE UNUSED SERVICE CAPACITY AVAILABLE FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT IN THE STUDY AREA DURING EACH PLAN PHASE. ALSO, SPECIFY THE SERVICE LIMIT THRESHOLDS (E.G. MAXIMUM RESPONSE TIME) FOR THE ABOVE SERVICES. Throughout the City of Miami, fire stations are located to provide a maximum response time of 4 minutes. In the downtown (Project) area fire stations are located as follows: ( See Map . ) Dmni Fire Station #2 1901 North Miami Avenue On Duty Force = 17 CBD Fire Station #1 144 N.E. 5th Street On Duty Force = IS Brickell Fire Station #4 1105 S.W. 2nd Avenue 4 On Duty Force - 14 According to information provided by the Fire, Rescue and Inspection Services Department (see Appendix ), the response time in the Project Area is less than 4 minutes. This response time is not likely to change as a result of new development. Future capital needs that have been identified resulting from projected Phase I downtown development include: 1. 3 emergency medical units 2. Renovation of Fire Stations #1,2,4 , Total costs are estimated at $6092000 INCLUDE MONITORING PROGRAMS FOR THE ABOVE SERVICES AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES THAT TABULATE AVAILABLE SERVICE CAPACITY, "CAPACITY DEBIT THE ACCOUNT" WHEN ADDITIONAL FACILITIES COME ON 86-84A 61 W 0 LINE. THE MONITORIIIG PROGRAMS MUST ALSO INCLUDE A MECHANISM FOR DETERMINING THE NEED FOR AND TIMING OF ADDITIONAL FACILITIES AND SPECIFY THE ACTIONS NECESSARY TO FUND AND CONSTRUCT FACILITIES KISS NEEDED. The Fire Department is a participant in development site plan reviews and in the City's Major Use Special Permit Process. Through these participations the Fire Department will be able to advise the City if and wl,-n ' -w I rn.-i1rn � r,J1F: n.1 Firms • facilities to meet circumstances presented by new growth and building design and to maintain a maximum 4 minute response time. The capital needs identified above and others that may arise will be met, in part, through the impact fee being developed by the City to charge developers for capital requirements bresulting from their Projects. Ad valorem taxes realized from new development will also be available to the City to meet future Fire Department needs. t:'�.0 !fia �t t li.illl `�!•+�l tt7ljpd�" sA�' i t Tt; M.• fit.{; 86-84S w CENTER V nr. , rcan - •� —w-amh wsa AM vrIL n4 %Uw--A..d AM Jovavv► Na &,,&WW.AW MAP 1 - 4 PUBLIC FACILITIES 30WNTOWNV40�MASTER PLAN )EVELOPMENT O REGIONAL IMPACT C s i QT� itu K. [ McCULLOUGH Uir c•r Ior August 229 1986 Jaf � tc�lYtt Katia M. Hirsh Economic Development Coordinator Downtown Development Authority 1818 One Biscayne Tower Miami, Florida 33131 Dear Ms. Hirsh: iCESAR H. ODIO City Mana6ef In response to your request for information regarding the service capabilities of the Department of Fire, Rescue and Inspection Services to the Omni, Southeast Overtown/Parkwest, Central Business District and Brickell areas from now through the years 2005, I submit the following: Throughout the City of Miami our Fire Stations are located to provide a maximum response time of four (4) minutes. The Omni area is served by Fire Station N2, located at 1901 North Miami Avenue with an on -duty manning force of 17 firefighters. The Overtown/Parkwest and CBD areas are served by Fire Station 01, located at 144 N. E. 5th Street with an on -duty manning force of 18 firefighters. The Brickell area is served by Fire Station 04, located at 1105 S. W. 2nd Avenue with an on -duty manning force of 14 firefighters. The response time in the aforementioned areas is less than four (4) minutes. Projected growth in those areas through the year 2005 may have a significant impact on emergency medical services and on -going fire safety inspections. The City of Miami is presently developing an impact fee to be imposed at building permit issuance and calculated based upon the costs of excess facilities in proportion to excess development. The projected growth for the indicated areas may be subject to that fee. If you require additional information, please contact me at the Fire Chief's office. Yours W truly, r an, Deputy Chief f dministration Fire, Rescue and Inspections Services Department 8E-849 it 'G 4it r tale one Bmcayne kern+ Miser• FtwnU 33131 (305) 579 6675 July 30, 1986 Deputy Chief Floyd Jordan City of Miami Fire Department 275 N.W. ---ad --atrae: Miami, Florida 33132 Dear Chief Jordan: The Downtown Development Authority and the City of Miami's Planning Department are currently undergoing the Development Regional Impact process for Downtown Miami. As per your conversation with Laura Brown of my staff, we need your assistance in answering the following questions from the Application for Development Approval. Enclosed are copies of the questions, a map of the Downtown study. area and our growth estimates for the years 1995, 2000 and 2005. Since time is of the essence in completing this study it would be greatly appreciated if you could get this information back to me in a weeks time upon receipt of this letter. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 579-6675. Sincerely, Katia M. Hirsh Economic Development Coordinator Encl. _ cc: Peter Andolina i 86-849 0 �a cu►ucar ISLAW Key: Submarkets k Outside ODA f llouudasies 4- 1)uwntuwn Miami Study A Miunli� i�" k j: Y __..._ t qi JACKSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL fl j 161 1 N W i?th AVl-Nt 1E • NALW H t)MDA 3313fi . Pam^- N; "j •`�4. j l(!/J/TJ Cij . i�ta lit 4 teat. ow 41 1, ' t i'v , I i I • 0 HEALTH CINI 305- BISCAYNE BOULEVARD o SUITE 200 9 MIAMI, FLORIDA 3313 "'.7 ROW" .0 0 1 i � � i i il,EALTH COU14CIL OF SOUTH FLORIDA - HRS DISTRICT XI SUBDISTRICT *3 - City of Miami + Hospitals 0 Nursing Homes ♦ Primary Care Centers Community mental Health Centers E L9 ' HC-t�36 SUBDISTRICT 3 - CITY OF MIAHI Subdistrict 3 includes all of the City of Miami. It also includes a small portion . of unincorporated county in its northwest corner --a densely populated area between Miami and Hialeah. In its southeast corner is Key Biscayne► an unincorporated community consisting mainly of upper -income homes and condo- minlu7 dove i = -gin-s. ides ��a cc .:,;unity cf Bey 2i cayne, :;.a .� „ -- �� .r �:r attractions and public parks on the Key. The Central City, the Dade County Civic Center complex, and the Medical Center complex also lie within the Sub- district. Miami Dade Community College has two campuses in Subdistrict 3. The whole Subdistrict is characterized by a number of arterial highways and an expressway system which has removed a great deal of housing, especially in blighted areas, displacing the residents that had lived there. Almost all of these roadways handle traffic in excess of their capacity because of their use by non -area residents. Most of the major arteries are committed for improve- ment between 1980-86. The entire Subdistrict is served with public water supplies, and most of the developed areas are part of the public sewage disposal system. Key Biscayne is an exception, with only one-third served by public sewer system. Expansion of the Virginia Key Sewage Treatment facility is corrrnitted for completion, and will serve Key Biscayne. There are no plans for extending the sewage disposal system cn the mainland for the next 5-10 years. Most of the elementary schools have enrollments exceeding their capacity; likewise, for one junior and two senior high schools in the area. Only one additional figh school is planned, however, and it is not committed for con- struction before 1985. All of the area is within six minutes fire response time, and nearly all of it -� is within three minutes as well. Key Biscayne is not included in the three minute response time. Both the medical center/civic center and downtown central business districts --_ are tR tJjSubd s r c gave undergone su i. re eve cpmn , which is planned for cont�n au Lion. Also committed for econorstic development is much of the 1980 riot area known as Model Cities. With proposed cutbacks in fed- erally assisted development programs, local gcvernment and business support will be needed to maintain and implement these plans. More recently, develop- ment projects for the Overtown area have been initiated. It is also noteworthy that the Edison -little River Conmunity within this Sub- district has become home to most of the Haitian refugees. The demographic data from the 1980 census cannot accurately reflect this estimated additional 40- - 45,000 people. Ow 4 HC-CFI-36 SUBDISTRICT 3 ii���r.��.rr{►r i..r �rrrr. {..rrs:.r.wr�s -. ._... _ __. ._ _. .._. -�- r.►i:r.r���..� II. QE�PrZC.S 11{{��u�V�,C •��Vl L•1 Vi• ��.�r ICI� «1�� �I. w. +� /.i t. I_�`.'1r�7or� ». �V4� of Subdistrict Z of Dis,_trir.,t,..Xj j% Total: 349#690 100 21 White: 223,920 64 17 Clack: 97,659 28 34 Unspecified: 28,111 8 33 Hispanic: 191,191* 55 32 1985 Projectod Population: 377480 2000 Projected Population: 393,135 *Hispanic is not a race category, and persons of Spanish oriSin may be of any race. Source: U.S. Census Bureau• Dade County Planning Department 1m. EILBUMM-9 DIM6IWIDY 87 ACE AM M Ago: 0-A 5ZI2 20-34 35-0. b5� �.5# Total No. male6.3 21.3 21.4 35.9 9.2 5.2 161.405 Female 5.3 16.6 20.6 36.5 11.3 7.6 188,285 Both 5.8 19.9 21.3 36.2 10.4 6.5 349490 Source: US Census Bureau 0 HC-CH-36 ' SUBDISTRICT 3 No. . Cedars Medical Center 700 Christian Hospital 40 P.L. Dodge 39 Highland Park General 106 Jackson Memorial 1250 Anne Bates leach 100 Mercy Hospital 549 Miami Jewish Horne 6 Hospital 32 Univ. of Miami Hospital d Clinics 70 Pon American Hospital 146 Veterans Admnistration 708 Victoria �OQ TOTAL 4040 1983A_ Licensed 51.5 Closed 119.1 67.2 80.5 48.7 70.7 80.5 82.3 73.4 83.8 M 70.5 Source: Health Council of South Florida• Inc. 1983 Hospital Utilization Report 980 11.5/1000 Population 5.6/1000 Population (when excluding P.L. Dodgb, Jackson Memorial Hospital, A.B. Leach and Veterans Administration) 1985 10.7/1000 Population 5.1/1000 Population (when excluding P.L. Dodge. Jackson Memorial Hospital, A.D. Leach and Veterans Administration) .�. 86-849 NC-CH-36 SUBDISTRICT SUMISTgICT LIVE51bD HOE &Q IM UJILIZATTON NO. 1982 Nur.5inc Floridean Human Resources Health Center 196 73.5 Jackson Heights 298 98.6 Jackson Manor 174 96.9 Miami Jewish Home 0' Hospital 332 98.4 Ponce de Leon 147 66.6 Riverside Care Center 80 Not Open Veterans Administration TOTAL 1369 92.7 N/R = Not Reported Sources: Florida HRS Nursing Home Census Report, July -December, 1982 Florida HRS List of Licensed Beds* May, 1984 0 HC-CH-36' 1- fiEffB& =RIP1 O The eastern part of this area is well developed commercially and also contains some of the better old residences of Miami. There are limited tourist facili- ties in this area. Adjacent is a commercial zone which extends north from the Central City. To the west of this zone is a Clack area. North and west is mostly lower- and middle-cla;s hous,ng. along ;,he Miami Rivcr, tt• 2 are various sorts of marina facilities for small ships and boats. The 1980 census indicates widespread povverty in the 3-a area. Nearly eyery census tract ir.• the area shows a much higher percentage of families below poverty level than the county average. The same is true of percentage rI families, labor force unemployed, and persons residing in crowded units. The part of this area known as Overtown, gust north and west of the Central Business District, is par- ticularly affected by poverty, and has been the focus of civil unrest, as well as attempts at economic solutions, in recent months. The portion of 3-a which is not part of this picture of poverty is the section lying along Biscayne Say north of Julia Tuttle Causeway, emconpassinC the communities of Day Point, Morningside, and Belle Meade. rr. 2EHW"KCs 1970 S Change 1980 , % Change 1985 2 Change 2000 .PnD,— 1929-aa _.%' LQS_ ...1'��_ I�S�ZD9Q ,.PA 176,631 -8 162483 +4 168,408 +2 171,773 Sources Dade County Planning Department 3-5 • CH-36 SUBDISTRICT 3 - AREA.3-A Total Win •e Mach UOSPWlflsd Hjsnan t_c ftRLlation No._._ JL No. JL ..H2 - JL _..No. JL 162083 53,636 , ,_ „33 `-95,904 ,. 59 12.543. _ .8 48,373 30 ' *Hispanic is not a race category, and persons of Spanish origin may be of any race. Age ILA 5=12 20-34 35-64 6S-74 —z5+ Teta____l No. Male 8.5 25.3 24.9 30.8 6.4 3.7 78,009 Female 7.9 23.4 24.4 31.1 7.6 5.5 84.074 Both 8.4 24.4 24.6 31.0 7.0 4.7 162.083 Source: US Census Bureau ECONOMTC jNOICATORS 4 -. Families Households - Families Between Receiving Below 100 d 125% of Public Labor Force Population Poverty ',,Poverty Level Assistance Unemployed Residing in t eves1 - 1979 " ` 1979 1&' It 1979 March - 1980 CWXded Units 11,535 26.7 3,305 7.6 10,614 18.5 5.900 8.5 65,474 40.4 Total No. Total No. Families Households Total No. in Labor Force Total Pope ationi• 43.231 57.332 69,739 MAW Source: US Census Summary File Tapes /1 and 03. Metro -Dade Planning Department HC-CH-36 SUBDISTRICT 3 - AREA 3-A �� ..�Yr•►irLr -ii Kiiii.i.iYlY.�if►iii.aYY�ii - __._ ���.�� +..•'S-oft III. HEALTH 5ERMIGES Publicly supported primary health care services are provided in this area by: • Borinquen Health Care Center e Economic Opportunity Family Health Center Liberty City Health Service Center ` The Dade County Public Health Department has five units in this area. The following federally qualified Health Maintenance Organizations provide primary care services in the area: • CIGNA HMO The New Horizons Community Mental Health Center has three service sites located in the area. The Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services has seven regular service centers in this area, as well as a special unit at the Juvenile Justice Center. o� i Oft to Area 3-b contains the original Little Havana and Coconut Grove, two areas both of which have been designated as health scarcity areas by the HSA of South Florida, and as poverty concentration areas by Dade County. Little Havana represents the American heart of refugee Cuba. This central area contains the poor, 0-4f`ra.y,- new iirrivals and-thrnse who,for a variety of reasons, arc- lass absorbed into tho Arerican way of life. Land use probler.s involve family dwellings scattered throughout multi -family districts, and a heavy strip of commercial build-up along all of the major arteries. Traffic is congested throughout the area which lacks off-street parking. Coconut Grove has truly a "pocket" of poverty completely encircled by upper - middle and upper -income residential areas, a tourist -oriented shopping area, and a four -lane heavily traveled highway. The Grove is the oldest residential area in Miami. The downtown-Grickell Avenue business district is also in this area and has experienced substantial growth in the last five years. The entire bayfront from the Miami River to Vizcaya is dotted with high-rise condominiums and skyscraping office towers. Except that portion that lies along the bayfront and on islands in Eiscayne Say, the whole of Area 3-b has a higher percentage of poverty than the Dade County average, according to the 1980 census. Percentage of households receiving public assistance was exceptionally high, compared to other areas, do for the year of 1979. The census tracts having hiShest public assistance percentages are in the heart of Little Havana. This probably reflects the availability of refugee funds at the ties. As these funds are being terminated, nuabers receiving public assistance is likely failing. II . QEMP.W.HJU P1W15.11TIDN MNDIS " PB�CTIORS 1970 S Change 1980 % Change 1985 9 Change 2000 :rAOP._ 1971D-8D_ _Pop,— 19M-O.. 24PL._ 1205_200 ... Pop 168,726 +11.2 187,607 +11.5 209*172 C +5.8 �_,221#362 Sources Dade County Planning Department „« 86"845 Oft i • HC-CM-36 SUBDISTRICT 3 - AREA 3-S Total White Black 1105m.ified Hispanic PnRul At I on -.tom,_ JL Ala- -5— eta, .. _!,_ 187,607 170,284 91 1,755 1 15.568 8 142,818 76 *Hispanic is not a race category, and persons of Spanish origin may be of any race, yq q PERCENTAGE QISTRIBUTION BY AM &Q SEX Age L-¢ 5.:12 20_34 35-64 65-74 .,.15± Total Male 3.9 17.5 19.3 40.7 11.9 6.7 83496 Female 3.2 14.7 17.6 40.8 14.4 9.3 104,211 Both 3.5 16.0 18.3 40.8 13.3 8.1 187,607 Famil ies Below Poverty No- --I_ 6,538 13.4 Source: US Census Bureau FamiI ies Between 100 & 125% of Poverty Level H2 - •-a- 2,726 5.6 Total No. FaMI 1j e$ 48,677 Households Receiving Public Assistance ..NO, -5— 14,085 19.4 Total No. Labor Force Unemployed ar h - 1980 NO, -z— 4,529 4.9 Population Residing in Crowded Un itS 45,834 24.4 Total PeanlatintL 7 Source: US Census Summary File Tapes 11 and 13, Metro -Dade Planning Department 40 72,762 Total No. in j,8bor Force 91,810 . MC-CH-36 SUBDISTRICT 3 - AREA 3'8 A' III. HEALTH SE&IM Y Publicly supported primary taro services are provided in this area by: UL ,. a Coconut Grove Family Health Center The Dade County Public Health Department does not have a unit in this area. jhp._ folIc"Y f;:�Crz,l ;.y qu; i t�r,anca �CrnanIs ;;roviz. ' primary care services in this area:V t Comprehensive American Care (CAC) e International Medical Centers HMO • South Florida Group Health, Inc. The Miami Mental Health Center has two service sites located in this area. The Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services has four service -- centers in this area. 48,677 72,762 910 C, 3-10 . 8E--849 _.. ... __._J.t�f'r:ix1N[Nst.!:•:...�1'�#��F^:••: v....-'.bpi 6�F i CITY OF MIAM1. FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO Katia M. Hirst DATE AUG 2 5 1986 PILE: ADM 3 Economic Development Coordinator .= Downtown Development Authority SUBJECT Downtown Development Staffin,' FROM rra ellce �io REFERENCES: Chief of. Police ENCLOSURES: 3 The future development of the Downtown area will have a considerable impact upon the service capabilities of the Miami Police Department. In order to accurately ascertain the impact upon the Department and its ability to provide effective and sufficient police protection and to insure security conscience structures are built, the Department must participate in preliminary site plan reviews with developers during the projects conceptual stage. This will not only benefit the general public and future clients in the area but will also be a cost -saving measure for the City and the developers. Enclosed is a map of the Downtown Miami Study Area with the current and proposed Miami Police facilities highlighted. Currently, the Miami Police Station located at 400 N.W. 2nd Avenue and the Overtown Mini Station located at 1600 N.W. 3rd Avenue are the only existing police facilities within the study area. There are two proposed sites for Mini Stations. One would be located at Bayside and the other in Bayfront Park. The completion of Bayside and the refurbishment of Bayfront Park are scheduled for April 1987. The development of the Mini Stations are still in the planning stage. I At the present time there is no unused service capacity available to meet the needs of new development within the study area or within the City. City-wide there has been an 11.8% increase in calls for service during the first six months of 1986 as compared to 1985, with only a 2.8% increase in patrol staffing. The percent of delayed dispatched calls has increased from 6.8% during 1985 to 8.5% for the first six months of 1986. Our resources are now strained by these increased demands for service. 7 >t- CITY OF MIAMI. FLORIDA Y, INTER43FFICE MEMORANDUM TO Kati a M. Hirst o�rE AUG 2 5 1986 FILE: ADM 3- Economic Development Coordinator Downtown Development Authority au•JEcr Downtown Development Staffin• . REFERENCES! FROM arenCe 1 C &012 � �- Chief of Police ENCLOSURES: 3 �y.i. The future development of the Downtown area will have a considerable impact upon the service capabilities of the Miami Police Department. In order to accurately ascertain the impact upon the Department and its ability to provide effective and sufficient police protection and to insure security conscience structures are built, the Department must participate in preliminary site plan reviews with developers during the projects conceptual stage. This will not only benefit the general public and future clients in the area but will also be a cost -saving measure for the City and the developers. Enclosed is a map of the Downtown Miami Study Area with the current and proposed Miami Police facilities highlighted. A Currently, the Miami Police Station located at 400 N.W. 2nd Avenue and the Overtown Mini Station located at 1600 N.W. 3rd Avenue are the only existing police facilities within the study area. There are two proposed sites for Mini Stations. One would be located at Bayside and the other in Bayfront Park. The completion of Bayside and the refurbishment of Bayfront Park are scheduled for April 1987. The development of the Mini Stations are still in the planning stage. At the present time there is no unused service capacity available to Meet the needs of new development within the study area or within the City. City-wide there has been an 11.8% increase in calls for service during the first six months of 1986 as compared to 1985, with only a 2.8% increase in patrol staffing. The percent of delayed dispatched calls has increased from 6.8% during 1985 to 8.5% for the first six months of 1986. Our resources are now strained by these increased demands for service. 0 �6--849 ►'r :r........ w.a+'Yr..WYWIIyy�.yyy Katia M. Hirst Economic Development Coordinator Downtown Development Authority r Page 2 04 The Department's staffing projections have been developed by estimating the service population from the Proposed Development Program for Downtown Miami outline which you provided. The ratio of police officers per resident population is figured at three officers per thousand. The ratio of officers for the transient population proje:ted is on a one and a half officers per thousand. The ratio is different for the transient population because they are normally present demanding service for one third of the day. The structures remain, needing police service as well. These projections are above and beyond the present number of officers now serving the City of Miami. Developments in other parts of the City will further impact on services provided by the Police Department thus creating additional needs for personnel. There is also a need for civilian personnel to be hired to support the compliment of sworn personnel. The ratio of civilian personnel desired is one civilian per three officers. The optimum police staffing for the three phases of development is presented cumulatively as follows: YEAR PHASE 1995 I SERVICE POPULATION 103,759 POLICE CIVILIAN OFFICERS PERSONNEL 178.2 59.4 2000 II 157,673 274.3 91.4 2005 III 221,724 386.6 128.9 The number of officers needed for the three phases will average out to 15 to 20 per year. Enclosed you will find Appendix I which details each phase and each area of development. i In order to insure that emergency routes accessible to all areas are maintained, as stated earlier, the Police Department must be forwarded the opportunity to ascertain the impact of each individual project from its conceptual stage. t `1• 04 86-84..r f f Katia M. Hirst -' Economic Development Coordinator Downtown Development Authority To supplement pp your study, Appendix II, a Fart I Crime comparison of the study area and the City, has been enclosed. reaz: It is hoped the information provided will be beneficial. If I may be of further assistance please don't hesitate to call. CDinzm i 1 N •y�� r n h ff i 4 } i } S MUNMTMr &xa)w Bay Key: •r `{-� ar 5ubmarkets �,�pD Gk.! •il..• Outside DDT,- O /� tioe� a•.►C 110uudatirs •// ®j)iirrlTOIJJ waa�• tTOY•6M �4oDa1W3�oE. - s AANDIX I Liam USE PHASE I — Year 1995 ONNI 0 ice Government office Retail/Service Hotel Residential Convention Wholesale/Industrial Transient Population/Police Officers Resident Population/Police Officers SEOPK Q ce Retail/Service Hotel Residential Convention Transient Population/Police Officers Resident Population/Pol' a Officers CED Office Government Office Retail/Service Hotel Residential Convention Wholesale/Industrial Institutional Attractions/Recreation Transient Population/Police Officers Resident Population/Police Officers HRICEELL Off--- ce Retail/Service Hotel Residential Transient Population/Police Officers Resident Population/Police Officers TOTAL SERVICE rOPULATION/POLICE OFFICERS 1,000,000 ft. 4,000 Empls./5,000 Vists. 150,000 sq. ft. 600 Empls./750 Vists. 50,000 sq. ft. 135 Empls./259 Shoppers 0 Rooms 500 Units [1,0001 persons 250,000 sq. ft. 1,000,000 sq. ft. 4,000 Em ls. 14� 2. 1,000J/3 371,000 sq. ft. 1,484 Empls./1,855 Vists. 103,500 sq. ft. 2'10 Empls./536 shoppers 500 Rooms 675 guests 4,000 Units [8,0001 persons 290,000 sq. ft. 4,830 7.2 [EEO 0 3,100,000 sq. ft. 12,400 Empls./15,500 Vists. 150,000 sq. ft. 600 Empls./750 Vists. 650,000 sq. ft. 1,757 Empls./3,368 Shoppers 650 Rooms 878 guests 1,000 Units [2,0001 persons 250,000 sq. ft. 50,000 sq. ft. 200 Empls. 3n0,000 sq. ft. 3,400 seats 3,400 persons • 38,853 58.3 2,000 3,000,000 sq. ft. 12,000 Emple./15,000 Vists. 350,000 sq. ft. 946 Empls./1,813 shoppers 350 Rooms 473 guests 2,050 Units [4,1001 persons 30,232/45.3 [4,10 , 103, 759/1,78.2 17l I�0 1z 11PHASE II - Year 2000 OTfxce 1,700,000 sq. ft. 6,800 Empls./8,500 Vists. Government Office 150,000 sq. ft. 600 Empls./750 Vists. Retail/Service ••• 100,000 sq. ft. 270 Empls./518 Shoppers Hotel 500 Rooms 675 guests Residential 800 Units +1 [1,6001 persons Convention 250,000 sq. ft. Wholesale/Industrial 1,000,000 sq. ft. 4,000 Em ls. Transient Population/Police Officers ,11. Resident Population/Police Officers 1,600 4. SEO.•,w Of17ce 657,500 sq. ft. 2,630 Empls./3,288 Vists. Retail/Service 147,900 sq. ft. 400 Empls./766 Shoppers Hotel 1,100 Rooms +`t 1,485 guests 4 Residential 6,500 Units [13,0001 persons Convention 600,000 sq. ft. Transient Population/Police Officers 8,569/12.8 Resident Population/Police Officers [13,000 9 CEO Office 4,500,000 sq. ft. 18,000 Empls./22,500 Vists. Government Office 400,000 sq. ft. 1,500 Empls./2,000 Vists. Retail/Service 900,000 sq. ft. 2,432,-Empls./4,663 Shoppers Hotel, 650 Rooms 875 guests Residential 1,800 Units (3,6001 persons Convention 250,000 sq. ft. j Wholesale/Industrial 50,000 sq. ft. 200 Empls. Institutional 300,000 sq. ft. . Attractions/Relation 5,000 seats 5,000 persons Transient Population/Police Officers 57,270 85.9 Resident Populablon/Police Officers [ 0 • slat BRICKELL iati Office 4,500,000 sq. ft. 18,000 Empls. /22, 500 Vists. Retail/Service 450,000 sq. ft. 1,216 Empls./2,332 shoppers Hotel 350 Rooms 473 guests Residential 3,500 Units (7,000] persons Transient Population/Police Officers 44,521/66.8 Resident Population/Police officers (7,05' .I.I. #lat TOTAL SERVICE-POPULATION/POLICE OFFICERS 157, 673/274.. 3 POLICE OF'F'ICER$PICIVILIAN PERSONNEL 274,3/91,4 Lhffu USE PHASE III - Year 2005 ,N 1 Olga ice 2,800,000 sq. ft. 11, 200• Empls. /14, 000 Vista. Govornment Office 150,000 sq. ft. '(600 Empls./750 Vista. Retoil/Service 200,000 sq. ft. 541 Empls./1,036 Shoppers Hatial 500 Rooms 675 guests Re-widential 1,200 Units [2,400] ,persons Conmention 250,000 sq. ft. Wha.esale/Industrial 2,000,000 sq. ft. 8,000 Em ls. Transient Population/Police-Officers 36►802 55.2 Resident Population/Police Officers 2,400 :o l ant SEWK; ob ce 1,003,500 sq. ft. 4,OL4 Empls./5,018 Vists. Ret•sril/Service 194,100 sq. ft. 525 Empls./1,006 Shoppers Hotiel 1,100 Rooms 1,485 guests Re"-dential 9,000 Units [18,0001 persons Convention - 600,000 sq. ft. Transient Population/Police Officers 12,048/18.1 Resident Population/Police Officers - [18,0()U 4. 11 CBD ' ► Mice 5,800,000 sq. ft. 23,201) Empls./29,000 Vists. Government Office 600,000 sq. ft. 2,400 Empls./3,000 Vists. Retail/Service 1,150,000 sq. ft. 3,108 Empls./5,959 Shoppers Hotiel 1,750 Rooms 2,363 guests Residential 2,820 Units (5,6401 persons Convention 1,. 500,000 sq. ft. Wholesale/Industrial 100,000 sq. ft. 400 Empls• Institutional 600,000 sq. ft. ` AtsLractions/Recreation 10,000 seats 10,000 persons Transient Population/Police Officers 79,430/119.1 Resident Population/Police Officers 15, 4 81 ICK I L ' office 5,800,000 sq. ft. 23,200 Empls./29,000 Vista. Retail/Service 600,000 sq. ft. 1,622 Empls./3,109 Shoppers Hotel 350 Rooms 473 guests Residential 5,000 Units [10,0001 persons 0� Transient Population/Police Officers 57,404/86.1 Resident Population/Police Officers [10,000 30. #;A Ti7�'1°A�. SERVICE P'OPUI.�iTI0;�8/POIaIGB OFFICERS 221,724 386.6 / PMACE OFFICERS/CIVILIAN PERSONNEL 386,6/128.9 r sumbers are figured as followed: ``'• - Offfa 'Employees: 1 employee per 250 sq. ft. of office' space. 'r r - hotel Guests: 1.5 person per room per day at a 90% occupancy rate. R ►r, - Permanent Residents 2 persons per unit. s - Office Visitor: 1 person per 200 sq. ft. office space. - Shopper: 1 shopper per 193 sq. ft. retail space. J. - Retail Employee: 1 employee per 370 sq. ft. retail space. tC' t ' (Above figures based on information in Draft Copy of "Downtown Miami Traffic Access and Mobility Improvement Study"). The below figures are not based on above study. f Wholesale/Industrial: Same as Office Employee. i t r. - Attractions/Recreation: 1 person per seat. •n - Convention: Not counted. t - Institutional: Not counted. `I rl I, Police Officers: - 1.5 Officers per 1,000 Transient Population. ` - tt: r - 3 Officers per 1,000 Resident Population. •t * Civilian Personnel: 1 civilian per 3 Police Officers T �PPSNDIX II �'� .< PART I Cl21Ml: COMPAl2I50N �R; DOWNTOWN UEVELOPMStJ'[' AUTHORI'PY ANfl SU[3MARKETS/CITY OF MIAMI ��„� 1982 through 19F�5 As Reported by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement 1982 1983 1984 1985 City of Miami 52,901 49,799 51,893 58,355 -_ D.D.A. and Submarkets 7,325 6,033 6,243 6,478 a �• Percentage of City 13.5 12.1 12.0 11.1 -- � � Reporting areass 154, 159, 160, 161, 164, 165, 166, 168, 169, . 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 248, 249, 335, 261, - - 262. , �_� _� t -� � .. . =--� _� C . E ,. • - � -. _ .,,' - I�� �.. :� ; - - -"` P 6 R 08-11-86 Y, ! �' _v __ � �.. �' ' • ��I�Mr �.�p. _... �... .aa - w.•..r aw++r....-Niir.i++�Vi4s+V-err. . r � .. � . S.j*+1 �-+�tVWri -__ - _ 0 QUESTION 12: OTHER PUBLIC FACILITIES (ENERGY) C.1 IDENTIFY THE PROJECTED UNUSED CAPACITIES OF THE ELECTRICAL GENERATION FACILITY AND TRANSMISSION LINE(S) TO WHICH CONNECTION WILL BE MADE FOR EACH PHASE OF THE PROJECT. The peal; -_lcctrl _3 i 2r_',ard For LF-- turfy arei In 1" " 290 MVA. Florida Power and Light (FPL) has a present capacity of 500 MVA to serve the area through its six (6) substations and 66 feeders. Consequently there is an unused capacity of approximately 210 MVA. Consequently, this signifies that FPL could serve an additional 72% demand increase with its present electrical generation and transmis- sion line facilities. FPL currently projects a 5% average demand load increase over the next 15 years. The peak demand by the year 2000 is expected to increase to 540 MVA. However by the year 2000, FPL will be able to serve more than twice the projected figure. Taking into account two additional substations and future feeders, the electrical generation capacity in the year 2000 could serve a demand of.1150 MVA or four (4) times the present demand. Consequently, as per the attached letter dated June 11th, 1986, from Mr. Guy J. Sanchez, FPL Maimi Downtown Manager, the capacities will be avail- able to serve even the most optimistic growth scenarios for the study area. C.2 INCLUDE AN ENERGY CAPACITY MONITORING PROGRAM THAT TABULATES AVAILABLE SERVICE CAPACITY. INCLUDE A MECHANISM FOR DETERMINING THE NEED FOR AND TIMING OF ADDITIONAL FACILITIES. DESCRIBE ACTIONS NECESSARY TO ENSURE THAT FACILITIES COME ON LINE WHEN NEEDED. FPL's divisions for planning and operations currently monitor the ser- vice demand of each particular substation area within the context of the combined capacity of the particular substation and feeder system. Long range planning activities project growth within each area based on historical trends and current permit/service request data. The estimated 5% average load growth per year is such a trend; and forms the basis for future electrical generation and transmission improvements. the ratio of electrical generation and transmission capacity to current demand load, is such that the capacity at any given time can serve the projected demand growth over a ten (10) year period. FPL is r2.n,1:;"n'4 by the Florida Electrical Power Plant Siting Act to file Tan ';_,r ?'r ;. q 19W: S1.113STATION SERVICE AREAS up*" &mfAn" amt.,= INCAL .......... tt.r."$Lms o; t-: - L 00) 1 required er iod. F L- I a IBC ACT. 10 TI I e I Ull ICOT r 10 Daub iAmw Arid A"WW" kic. b"w." KwW And Vora. ke- DowNTOWN MASTERPLAN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT �j ns . olk 014 p �Ow%d ftnmw A.0 A kr— 54,PwW. KuW XW Vtl& fi-W- Wa:,-Rmog A.0 "Wooll, kll— EnIlvVI-Ndi ENawwn9 CO*WWA& ft DowNTOWNvASTERPLAN ,olfilorio"m DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT C.3 PROVIDE AN ENERGY MANAGEMENT/CONSERVATION PLAN THAT PROVIDES FOR ENERGY -EFFICIENT CONSTRUCTION. ALSO, DISCUSS THE POTENTIAL USE OF ON -SITE COGENERATION OF POWER. Currently, FPL's Marketing and Energy Conservation Department is respon- sible for assisting developers, property owners, landlords and tenants in the implementation of energy conservation programs involving "passive energy conservation techniques" such as: the use of high-energy ef- fieicnt Mies; %: t4�" -+:, :�': /: insulation Loth rigid ar4 non -rigid; shade or screening devices -for glazed openings, etc. It is recommended that the City of Miami, in cooperation with Metro- politan Dade County and FPL collaborate in the development of energy efficient design/construction guidelines for incorporation as part of the South Florida Building Code (SFBC). These guidelines would extend beyond the current MODEL ENERGY EFFICIENCY CODE which regulates all new construction and renovations over a specified scope. In essence the guidelines would assist in the procurement of "energy credits" available from FPL and in the incorporation of energy efficiency measures not currently recognized. The following is a sample listing of energy efficient construction measures which should be considered particularly in large developments within the study area: 1. Intelligent zoning to permit varying system operations for spaces with different needs at a particular instant in time. This in- cludes isolating dampers in ductwork to permit the operation of systems from common headed units, thereby permitting operation of single or multiple floors as a function of occupancy. 2. Proper selection of air distribution devices to permit use of in- creased differentials between the space and supply air temperatures. A reduction of 1,000 cfm in a system operating at 4 inches of water lowers energy consumption by 1 kw for each hour of operation. 3. Reduction of the minimum amount of outside air brought into the building to the minimum required by the space usage to achieve a concomitant reduction in cooling loads for the summer. 4. Review of the systems to permit possible inclusion in design specifications of automatic outside air/return air switching de- ivices that, based on the total heat content of the outside air and return air, use minimum, variable or 100 percent outside air, depend- ing on the least amount of energy to be consumed by the operating system. - O•MOORArryr And Abbocwlt; me Btf—Ow"C Kaki A'W Ys WdUMS-RAW AnC Jmnsor MC I#eAS ! CEZrL.N•;-, PON 5. Higher km. perature differentials in chilled water and condenser U water systems to lower water flow and pumping horsepower for these systems. 6. Careful design of lighting systems with special emphasis on reduced �1 wattage and circuiting for not only normal occupancy use, but also cleaning operations. T_ �rC yijl► !� '1 j1.;!d T� 1` i',1. }1'"71 !1 fusage of energy. ►' S. Provide operable window sections as a conservation ftrasure. i 1 9. Use of alternative glazing systems, shading devices, colors of exterior materials, and location of shading to ensure overall l reductions in energy consumption. 10. Provide open garage facades to reduce energy consumption for venti- lating that facility. 11: Maximize the use of flow restrictors for plumbing fixtures wherever possible. The utilization of any waste heat from kitchens to heat t the water should be considered. 12. The utilization of nondepletable resource energy with particular emphasis on the possible application of solar energy to generate domestic hot water, should be considered wherever possible. {: 13. The selection of chillers with increased surface to lower energy 3 consumption to IL-s than .70 kw/ton of useful output should be encouraged. 14. Energy management systems to permit the use of computer technology to reduce overall building energy consumption should be required for any ' commercial office building with more than 50,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area. j 15. Conformance to the current issue of the Model Energy Efficiency Code for Building Construction for the State of Florida (mentioned previously herein). 16. Sizing power company transfoamars closer to de mind rather than con- nected load. s 17. Using fluorescent lighting control within buildings controlled by local switches. s . 18. Investigating various lighting alternatives, including task lighting, energy saving fluorescent lighting, and combined return air -lighting to determine which is more energy efficient. 19. Investigating the use of a central control system with the capability to control the air conditioning systems on a programred schedule. 20. Adding power factor capacitor correction devices for improved power facto c,� 1 r �� r„c' 1„�' _" ° _; ,r r a ors f� r! %S %� �< location, i.e., at motor or at motor control switchboard. 21. Using a variable volume chilled water pumping system to reduce pumping horsepower. 22. Using individual air handling units on each level to reduce fan horsepower and provide good air transport factors. 23. Using self -closing doors at locations which open into non air conditioned areas. 24. Providing wall (R-11 nin) and roof (R-19 min) insulation which exceeds the energy code requirements, duct insulation, and piping insulation. 25. Using highly reflective dual -pane insulating glass wherever possible. 26. Making the building a cool light color to reflect the sun's rays. _ 27. Encourage site planning concepts such as east -west axis orienta- tion to gini mize the impact of the low altitude morning and afternoon sun. 28. Utilize shade trees and plantings to provide shade to glazed areas. 29. Utilize mulch along all landscaped areas since mulch shades the soil and reduces water loss from the soil; and consequently mini•nizes the need for irrigation. FPL currently assists developers in connection with the use of on -site cogeneration through the planning stage in areas of applicable rates, feasibility, construction details and interconnection. However, due to economic feasibility and anticipated return on investment within a "short range perspective", cogeneration has not been a popular concept within the private sector. The option of cogeneration will continue to play a more significant role within the context of public facilities, large governmental complexes and hospitals where suitable uses for the cogeneration by-products (i.e. steam, chilled -water and hot water) are more easily found than in single use developments. 3 ON CA SPECIFY MONITORING PROGRAM FUNDING SOURCES AND DESCRIBE REGULATORY AND PERMITTING CHANGES AND/OR RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS NEEDED TO ENSURE THAT DEVELOPMENT IS PERMITTED ONLY WHEN FACILITIES ARE AVAILABLE. It is highly improbable that development could be permitted at a time when there was insufficient electrical generation/transmission ca- p�city to meet -the new or added demand, based,on the previous re-.. sporis,es C.1' anc C.'2:` In 'any event such an, occurrence could be- casi iy avoided simply through a City administrative order requiring that all proposed development procure a "demand/service certificate" from FPL certifying that there is capacity available to service the proposed development. The "demand/service certificate" would be a pre- requisite to the issuance of a building permit by the City of Miami's Building Department. C7[J-849 Stye 11, 1986 - Bermello, Kurki, & Vera, Inc. 55 Alnt;ria • Cbral Gables, FL 33134 Attn: Mr. Willy A. Bermello President 11. U, ROX (>`tiy(W MIAMI. FLORIDA 33102.5900 PHONE 529.SM i BECEREDJUt) Dear Willy: In regards to your letter dated May 13th, 1986 requesting information as to FPL's capability to service the load growth in the Downtown area (by Downtown we are referring to Omni, Overtown, Central Downtown, Little Havana and Brickell) , I an pleased to provide you with the following: The peak electrical demand for this area in 1985 was 290MVA. The average load growth is projected to be 5.0% per year over the next 15 years. The peak demand by year 2000 is e)pected to increase to 540MVA. Hawes, the potential demand that FP._ :an serve by year 2000 is more than twice the projected figure. This can be understood by considering the following factors: 1. FPL presently serves this area fran six substations with 66 feeders. When carrying full capacity, these feeders can serve a demand of 500MVA. 2. The ultimate capability of the existing substations with all future feeders plus those now in service is 952MVA. (See attachnent #2) I 3. With two additionsl substation sites developed and all feeders installed, FPL will have the capability to serve a demand of 1150MVA. (see attachient #3) In summary, the present peak demand in the Downtown Miami area is 290MVA, and we will have facilities in place, if needed, to serve a demand of 1150M M. This represents a Load increase of approximately four times . today's level, and I am confident we can serve any load alternative presented to us. 86-84:9 PEOPLE ... SERVING PEOPLE In regards to energy managernt/conservation plan, I can tell you that the Marketing and Energy Conservation D`pt. of FP&L is responsible for helping our customers to inpl:ement the many energy conservation programs. This includes assisting designers and developers for energy efficient buildings. In.,regard$. to tt)-potential use of on -site o�?^ncration, w- can assist a �3evelo r` iii il-�-- pianning st-aga in U P aria of q-)JAIL; aim rotes. feasibility of ttr_ project, construction details, interconnection, etc. + I believe this information satisfies your request, however, should you require additional details, please do not hesitate to give me a call on 529-5061. Sincerely yours, City J. Sanchez Miami Downtown Manager mh UuV�� a 10.'��, 4WI+A 1 U11 CrWIL.Li.«i►4 ML CiiJl -SiII Wlj .L.:Jw e6w s �-� mom wk K� rr�Ir �. rC!POD/W- ITww ft to fez w� p may. ;•_ 'sY3its tX�s 3 t f � S i � � e♦ - •♦ i.,'r s. rye' i E 3 •y r iE 4 in lL ZNX, t 1`t7F"J { on W" n mm wv ■ "!!i i ` MF'NWF 4 or R#, PM ru en .. � Rom, � � � �y 1� � ■ � �` t �'a4 ` 07' 10 wTV- jwj� an pro anaTOWrTm Mjr /wji,'Z� x # tra i r,{* f f+ f o .. C[ It . € J< >~ �. tt�-, #� ter. R!� 1r i - ,►1 �` � +ice �'. '.a f�alP1r �r(av t .r. r w�7 L_ �`— ,- • WE tbtt♦R:+�:• Rom F" gm •' r<iw nn wr Sri` tr r�+ tr W W WN W A t+e1 --*.. • ,.._..._ .._OrM � 117rirmrml i1 ' � i • - RIrC ri � a..... r• p t. r� t�'f tRff � /`� �Ii r� tom' � 4 ��� � fir•ttr�r�� ' JJU rm Now Vol �v ~ a 3 3.' u <'N { b. EDUCATION IDENTIFY THE CAPACITY PROJECTED TO BE AVAILABLE FOR ELEMENTARY, MIDDLE SCHOOL, AND HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN THE DEVELOPMENT AREA AT THE END OF EACH PHASE. The Dade County School Board is an elected body responsible for ' providing, administering, and ovorseeinq the public education • facilities and needs throughout Dade County, including the Project Area. According to information received by the Facility Planning and Construction Division for Dade County Public Schools (see Appendix ), the following schools serve the Project Area: The Schools serving the Omni District area are as follows: Miramar Elementary, 109 N.E. 19th Street (2-5) Buena Vista Elementary, 3001 NW 2nd Avenue (K-2) Phyllis Wheatly Elementary, 1801 NW 1st Place (K-6) Robert E. Lee, 3100 NW Sth Street (6-8) Nautilus Jr., 4301 N. Michigan Avenue, Miami Beach (7-8) Miami Jackson Sr., 1751 NW 36 Street (9-12) Miami Beach Sr., 2231 Prairie Avenue (9-12) Miramar and Buena Vista schools operate as a pair. The Schools serving the CBD District are as follows: Southside Elementary, 45 SW 13th Street (K-6 ) F. Douglas Primary, 314 NW 12th Street (K-3) Booker T. Washington, 1200 NW 6th Avenue (7-9) Miami Jackson Sr., 1751 NW 36 Street (9 -12) The Schools serving the Brickell District are as follows: Southside Elementary, 45 SW 13th Street (K-6) F. Douglas Prirnary, 314 NW 12th Street (K-3 ) Booker T. Washington. 1200 NW 6th Avenue (7-9) Miami Jackson Sr., 1751 NW 36 Street (9-12) With the exception of Booker T. Washington, all of the schools are operating near or beyond program capacity. The School Board estimated the number of students that would be generated downtown based on anticipated new housing units over the next twenty years. Since receiving the School Board estimates. the downtown development program has been revised by the applicant. The School Board projections have consequently been adjusted by the applicant, using the same assunVtions and factors, to correspond to the current ti v.ee Student Estimates P '• Phase I Phase II Phase III OMNI Estimated Elm. Students 68 41 54 _�- Estimated Jr. High 30 18 24 Estimated Sr. High 27 16 22' 1 Estimated Elem. Students 135 108 138 A Estimated Jr. High 60 48 61 Estimated Sr. High 57 45 58 BRICKELL -_- Estimated Elem. Students 309 188 195 Estimated Jr. High 219 133 138 Estimated Sr. Nigh 126 76 79 -- 1 TOTAL 1,uji ! The School Board has budgeted funds for a replacement facility for =1 Booker T. Washington Junior High School. Plans call for also =1 replacing Buena Vista Elementary and Miramar Schools. INCLUDE A MONITORING PROGRAM THAT TABULATES AVAILABLE CAPACITY, DEBIT _= THE "CAPACITY ACCOUNT" WHEN DEVELOPMENT IS PERMITTED, AND CREDIT THE "CAPACITY ACCOUNT" WHEN ADDITIONAL FACILITIES COME ON LINE. THE -' MONITORING PROGRAMS MUST ALSO INCLUDE A MECHANISM FOR DETERMINING THE NEED FOR AND TIMING OF ADDITIONAL FACILITIES AND DESCRIBE ACTIONS ' NECESSARY TO FUND AND CONSTRUCT NEEDED FACILITIES. The City will annually advise the School Board regarding the amount of residential development that has been approved or is under { construction. They will also be advised of projected development 100 approvals over the next year. Specific plans from the School Board on how new growth will be accommodated are not available. Applicant was advised that the School =— Board monitors conditions yearly. Facility needs are identified and measures taken dependent on available funding. A non capital measure available to the School Board for meeting new student demands is adjusting attendance boundaries to utilize available capacities in _--_ existing schools. Buena Vista and Mi rama r Schools would be retained if growth requires. AA•1 n.M14—n,4 4 N,,# +n.. in harf,� n.?ram• ,..♦ n +�(, . .. , ... .. a y.. �' q•"{L.+� t!*Y'i�L (�}'{r7 Cfa i1J {I ra . !1 vim:+_' 4 t. s DR. LEONARD BRITTON SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS DADE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FACILITY PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION 489 EAST DRIVE DADE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD MIAMI SPRINGS, FLORIDA 33166 MR. ROBERT RENICK, CHAIRMAN DR. KATHLEEN B. MAGRATH, VICE-CHAIRMAN MR. G. NOLMES BRADDOCK MR. PAUL L. CEJAS OR. MICHAEL KROP July 3, 1986 MS. JANET R. MCALILEY Yo W11 1 IAM H. TURNER Ns. Katia M. Hirsh, Coordinator Economic Develor-nent Downtown Develop. -,lent Authority 1818 One Biscayne Tower Miami, Florida 33131 RE: DOWNTOWN MIAMI DRI Dear Ms. Hirsh: Referencing your Downtown Miami ADA, I have estimated the low growth and high growth scenarios for each district and list those schools serving each district. The districts and estimated student population are listed below: Low Growth High Growth Omni 500 units 800 units Estimated Elem. Students 68 108 Estimated Jr. High 30 48 Estimated Sr. High 27 44 COD 1500 units 2300 units Estimated Elem. Students 203 311 Estimated Jr. High 90 138 Estimated Sr. High 82 126 Orickell 2050 units 3500 units Estimated Elem. Students 266 454 Estimated Jr. High 118 202 Estimated Sr. High 108 184 The School serving the Omni District are as follows: Buena Vista Elementary, 3001 NW 2nd Avenue K-2nd grade) Phyllis Wheatly Elementary, 1801 NW 1st Place K-6) Robert E. Lee, 3100 NW 5th Avenue 16-8) Nautilus Jr., 4301 N. Michigan Avenue, Miami Beach 19-12) 7-8) Miami Jackson Sr., 1751 NW 3fth Street Miami Beach Sr., 2231 Prairie avenue (9-12) All of the above schools are serving near or beyond program capacity. DR. LEONARD BRITTON ',.. SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS DADE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FACILITY PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION 469 EAST DRIVE OAOE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD MIAMI SPRINGS, FLORIDA 33166 MR, ROBERT RENICK. CHAIRMAN DR. KATHLEEN K MAGRATH, VICE-CHAIRMAN MR. G. HOLMES BRADDOCK MR. PAVL L. CEJAS OR. MICHAEL KROP July 3, 1986 MS. JANET R. MCALILEY Yp Wit 1 IAM H. TURNER Ns. Katia M. Hirsh, Coordinator Economic Development Downtown Develop,-,;enL Authority 1818 One Biscayne Tower Miami, Florida 33131 RE: DOWNTOWN MIAMI ORI Dear Ms. Hirsh: JUL -b Referencing your Downtown Miami ADA, I have estimated the low growth and high growth scenarios for each district and list those schools serving each district. The districts and estimated student population are listed below: - Low Growth Otani 500 units Estimated Elem. Students 68 Estimated Jr. High 30 Estimated Sr. High 21 COD 1500 units Estimated Elem. Students 203 Estimated Jr. High 90 Estimated Sr. High 82 Brickell 2050 units Estimated Elem. Students 266 Estimated Jr. High 118 Estimated Sr. High 108 The School serving the Omni District are as follows: High Growth 800 units 108 48 44 2300 units 311 138 126 3500 units 454 202 184 I Buena Vista Elementary. 3001 NW 2nd Avenue (K-2nd grade) Phyllis Wheatly Elementary, 1801 NW 1st Place (K-6) Robert E. Lee, 3100 NW 5th Avenue 6-8 ' Nautilus Jr., 4301 N. Michigan Avenue, Miami Beach 7-8) Miami Jackson Sr., 1751 NW 36th Street 19-12) Miami Beach Sr., 2231 Prairie Avenue (9-12) i All of the above schools are serving near or beyond program capacity. *, ty The schools serving the CBD District are as follows: Southside Elementary, 45 SW 13th Street (K-6) F. Douglas Primary, 314 NW 12th Street (K-3) Booker T. -Washington, 1200 NW 6th Avenue (7-9) Miami Jackson Sr., 1751 NW 36th Street (9-12) With the exception of Booker T. Washington, all of the schools are operating near or beyond progr4.n capacity. Tfre'school's serving the `Brfckel l District are as follows: Southside Elementary, 45 SW 13th Street •(K-6) F. Douglas Primary, 314 NW 12th Street (K-3) Booker T. Washington, 1200 NW 6th Avenue (7-9) Miami Jackson Sr., 1751 NW 36th Street (9-12) With the exception of Booker T. Washington, Jr., all of the schools are operating near or beyond program capacity. In terms of capital improvements, the School Board has budgeted funds for a replacement facility for Booker T. Washington. Upon completing construction of BTW, a new school facility is planned for Buena Vista Elementary. This replacement will be budgeted in a future fiscal year. If you wish to review this data further, please do not hesitate to call. _ QUESTION 12E: RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE 1) COMPLETE TABLE 12.1: EXISTING PUBLIC RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE The City of Miami has in its downtown over 100 acres of continuous city - owned waterfront open space including Bayfront Park, the FEC Tract, and Bicentennial Park. Bayfront Park is now undergoing reconstruction and will emerge as a waterfront open space which meets the recreational, entertainment, and leisure needs of residents, workers and visitors to the roty_.arui.,r,egi.an.. - The_ newly, redesigned 3ayfr.ont-.Bark .will include water fountains, leisure and play areas, a laser light tower, an open-air amphitheatre and an extensive waterfront walkway system which will connect the park with the remainder of the City's waterfront. Table 12.1 includes Bayfront Park and Bicentennial Park from the waterfront open space system as well as the other prominent downtown open spaces listed below: The Metro -Dade Cultural Center Plaza, which is surrounded by such facilities as the new Dade County Public Library, the South Florida Historical Museum, and the Fine Arts Center. The plaza is frequently used for cultural events including exhibits and concerts. The Miami Dade Community Colle a Plaza and 4th Street Mall, which serves t e needs o students and visitors to the campus as well as sponsoring college -related cultural and educational activities for the community. A Government Center Oeen Space, which is in its present form, over 3 acres i, n6scapes, passive green space serving the western edge of downtown. Government Center employees and visitors enjoy its leisurely atmosphere in the midst of the busy city on a daily basis. Fort Dallas Park, which is currently a .75 acre mini -park on the Miami ver. The park is a passive open space which also houses the historic Fiagler Worker's House. Brickell Park, is a 4.7 acre neighborhood park which opens onto Biscayne Bay. �t5ough the park currently serves a small group of people, future improvements are expected to open it up to more of Brickell Avenue's work force. Paul S. Walker Mini Park, which is burrowed into a .1 acre site on Flagler Street is among the most popular "inner city" parks in downtown. It serves a real need in its location by providing ample seating with tables and a concession stand. Pace Park, although outside the D.R.I. boundary area, this park is quite o teen used by the downtown population. It is not uncommon to see Pace Park used in` the early evenings with people going out for a walk or a jog. <w.. 12E-1 -0 QUESTION 12E: RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE 1) COMPLETE TABLE 12,1: EXISTING PUBLIC RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE The City of Miami has in its downtown over 100 acres of continuous city - owned waterfront open space including Bayfront Park, the FEC Tract, and Bicentennial Park. Bayfront Park is now undergoing reconstruction and will emerge as a waterfront open space which meets the recreational, entertainment, and leisure needs of residents, workers and visitors to the 0ty..and ,re9iQ,n,.. T)ie. newly, redesigned 3ayfront-.Rark .will include water fountains, leisure and play areas, a laser light tower, an open-air amphitheatre and an extensive waterfront walkway system which will connect the park with the remainder of the City's waterfront. Table 12.1 includes Bayfront Park and Bicentennial Park from the waterfront open space system as well as the other prominent downtown open spaces listed below: The Metro -Dade Cultural Center Plaza, which is surrounded by such facilities as the new Dade County Public Library, the South Florida Historical Museum, and the Fine Arts Center. The plaza is frequently used for cultural events including exhibits and concerts. The Miami Dade Communit Colle a Plaza and 4th Street Mall, which serves the needs of students and visitors to the campus as well as sponsoring college -related cultural and educational activities for the community. A Government Center 0 en Space, which is in its present form, over 3 acres of landscaped, passive green space serving the western edge of downtown. Government Center employees and visitors enjoy its leisurely atmosphere in the midst of the busy city on a daily basis. Fort Dallas Park, which is currently a .75 acre mini -park on the Miami River. The park is a passive open space which also houses the historic Flagier Worker's House. Brickell Park, is a 4.7 acre neighborhood park which opens onto Biscayne Bay. Although the park currently serves a small group of people, future improvements are expected to open it up to more of Brickell Avenue's work force. Paul S. Walker Mini Park, which is burrowed into a .1 acre site on Flagler treet is among the most popular "inner city" parks in downtown. It serves a real need in its location by providing ample seating with tables and a concession stand. Pace Park, although outside the D.R.I. boundary area, this park is quite often used by the downtown population. It is not uncommon to see Pace Park active` ih' 'the 'early evenings with people going out for a walk or a jog. :n.. 12E-1 86-849 . :; n 1 FACILITY TYPES i TABLE 12.1: EXISTING PUBLIC RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE NtMR OF ACRES RESPNSIBLE ENTITY FACILITIES a School Sites Elementary 1 .77 0 .77 BPI' BPI' BPI' Middle 0 0 0 High 0 0 0 0 City of City of City of Muni Parks 5 1.63 0 1.63 Miami 11 ee Miami ee n Miami ee le Neighbo.hood 5 .9 .9 ee 11 11 Regional 2 72.3 0 72.3 Natetf rout Walkways 1 � 8929.8 4.37 0 4.37 j-�ent an Owners, Public I� , Ad acent Land Owners Adjacent Land Owners linear ft. and Private Commercial Recreation 1 8 12 20 City of Miami Leasee (Rouse Co.) Leasee (Rouse Co.� ;_ Public Opf!n Space 7 17.17 0 17•17 Attachment 8 ��Rachment 8 Attachment 8 TOTAL. 24 1 145.84 1 12 157.84 t rn • ID * Some of the City Parks included in these totals are not In the ORI Boundaries, however, they are included because they do serve the Downtown ORI boundary areas. (See'Attachment A for complete list of parks). 1Board of Public Instruction s ATTACHMENT A 3 CITY OF MIAMI PARKS ' FACILITY TYPE ACREAGE RESPONSIBLE ENTITY Bayfront Park Regional 39.3 City of Miami —'rya-tef- + Bayside Specialty Center Recreation 8 land City of Miami/Rouse Co. Bicentennial Park Regional 33 'City of Miami Fort Dallas Park Mini Park 0.75 City of Miami Brickell Park Neighborhood 4.7 City of Miami Paul S. Walker Park Mini Park 0.1 City of Miami Central Miami Mini Park - --Mini- Park--,- - ' - 0.18 -- -- City of Miami Brickell Plaza Mini Park Mini Park 0.1 City of Miami * Pace Park Neighborhood 12 City of Miami * Southside Park Neighborhood 2.2 City of Miami * Lummus Park Community 7.0 City of Miami * Dorsey Park Neighborhood 2.5 City of Miami * Simpson Park Neighborhood 3.5 City of Miami * Jose Marti Park Community 9.7 City of Miami * Triangle Mini Park Mini Park 0.5 City of Miami Not In DRI boundary area, but serves Downtown. + :Under construction. z• ti R �.: ^ r`'' „ � ii �� Yt f-;'����.. yl 4'r�j':a`.'-•-.' •y- c -; '�e f t.. .. St. ... y.. X.�1 .i. i' f-rt�f"E yr. :•,'., n�,�ba�. § '. . ,� � i�" i...� '�,.,.1�, y t, f" -•s `.K� '• r,, ,t • _ .r ,�," J7 r t eH,� t y-� � `�x —_. _. . _�. ...., _..__r. ga'.'. .. s -`+t_ ..r ,.��nry w., v.,c.,. .:,;#., .,,,.<-. a. 'h .ez.•%rc ., ._. --- A f. _4 ATTACHMENT 0 EXISTING PUBLIC OPEN SPACE LOCATION _=F-s -.,L-USPONSIBLE ENTITY 0 M Brickell: NONE CED: Cultural Center 0.41 acres Dade County Plaza Miami Dade Community 2.42 acres Miami Dade Junior College College Plaza Board of Trustees Dade County Courthouse 0,32 acres Dade County Steps Plaza Dade County Administration 0.73 acres Dade County Building Plaza State Center Plaza 0.40 acres State of Florida Government Center Open 3.49 acres Dade County Space OMNI: City of Miami Cemetery 9.4 acres i City of Miami Total 17'17 acres U Southside Park, which is also just outside the D.R.I. boundary area serves the resIdent�ial community of downtown better than any other park. It's proximity to Southside Elementary School and the large adjacent residential community makes it a perfect park for children and young adults. Lummus Park, which is again just outside the D.R.I. boundary area serves both emp oyees and residents along the western edge of downtown. This park's proximity to the river and other city -owned parcels of land along the river, makes it a number one choice for redevelopment into an active waters edge open space which will serve the riverfront. 2) COMPLETE TABLE 12.2: PROPOSED PUBLIC RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE The proposed publicly owned open spaces for Downtown Miami, which are included in Phase I, II and III of Table 12.2, will add to the completion of an open space network which provides each neighborhood with the types of open spaces required to meet it's particular needs. Private recreational and leisure facilities are also expected to be included in many of downtowns new residential and commercial projects, but are not included in Table 12.2. Among the future phases of public open space, Table 12.2 includes additions to the waterfront walkway system. This is expected to be a continuous bay and river walk in the future; however, construction of new segments of the system is dependent upon the location and timing of private development on waterfront lands. Some projects which are expected to reach completion in Phase I development are: Brickell Promenande, which involves the restructuring of South loth Street between the Metrorail station and Brickell Avenue to serve the Brickell area as a pedestrian retail street with limited automobile access. Completion of the Government Center Open Space which will add over 3 acres to the existing green space, as well as fountains and seating areas. Re -design and widening of Bisca ne Boulevard, which involves adding over 5.5 acres to the Boulevard as well as a unique new design for the pavement and landscaping by the well-known and talented landscape architect, Roberto Burle Marx. The following are among the Phase II projects which will add a great deal to the open space network: Redevelopment of the P.E.C. Tract and Bicentennial Park, which is necessary in order to complete tfie TDO + acre public water rout system of downtown Miami. Projects being considered for these parcels include such public facilities as a Maritime Museum, a Science Center and an Aquarium. 12E-2 Phase 1 FACILITY TYPES TABLE 12.2: PROPOSEO PUBLIC RECREATION AND' OPEN SPACE NUMBER OF ACRES RESPONSIBLE ENTITY FACILITIES 10 School Sites Elementary Middle 0 0 0 0 High City of City of City of Parks: Mini Parks 1 0.8 0 0.8 Miami Miami Miami Neighborhood 0 0 0 0 Comunity 0 0 0 0 Regional 0 0 0 0 Waterfront Walkways 1 P' 1975 linear feet 0.9 0 0.9 City of Miami City of Miami City of Miami Comercial Recreation 0 0 0 0 Public O en Space R P 3 39.63 0 39.63 See Attachment C See Attachmen_ C See Attachment C Subtotal TOTAL 5 41.33 0 41.33 CA cr rP •CQ ' PHASE 1 PROPOSED OPEN SPACE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE FACILITY ACREAGE RESPONSIBLE ENTITY Brickell Promenade 0.69 acres City of Miami/Adjacent Land Owners Biscayne Boulevard 26.63 acres and City of Miami 5.51 new acres Government Center 3.34 new acres for Dade County Open Space a 6.8 acre total qPJr — # as .A -�, jF �.i t YS••6K��� eS��•�. /..+ :�y�iy�', fs• • �'+ � ..T�:+,' . , • '•~F '* _ •T.• l s�? ii_. North River Drive Farmer's Market Plaza, which would open onto the river as well as a Farmer's and Fish Market. Although this site is just outside the D.R.I. study area (on the Miami River banks at NW 2-3rd Street) it will serve downtown employees and visitors as well as the adjacent neighborhoods. No additional public parks are proposed beyond Phase II. Private parks and open space are dependant on timing of private development. There is no way to project those at this time. 3) DESCRIBE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND/OR RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS NEEDED TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT OPEN SPACE. The existing provisions in the Zoning Atlas (Ordinance 9500) (See Appendix ), are sufficient to insure open space/recreation space/pedestrian space in conjunction with private development. Attention is called to Article 20 "General and Supplementary Regulations" sections 20-11 through 20-13, and Article 15 "SPI Special Public Interest Districts." SPI districts affect the Brickell area, part of the Omni area, and the Biscayne Boulevard portion of the CBD. Open space in conjunction with private development along the Miami River and Biscayne Bay is further provided for in Subpart A section 3(4)(b) of the Miami Charter. This section sets forth mandatory set back requirements and side yard requirements and provides for public access to 04 and amenities for the waterfront. Policies and criteria for the development and utilization of publicly provided open and recreation spaces will be established as part of the Downtown Master Plan. The capital costs associated with park ind open space development will be covered, in part, by the City's proposed Impact Fee Ordinance. Consideration is also being given to seeking amendments to F.S. Chapter 170 which would permit municipalities to establish special assessment districts to cover the costs of park development. 12E-3 all FACILITY TYPES TABLE 12.2: PROPOSED PUBLIC RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE NUMBER OF ACRES RESPONSIBLE ENTITY FACILITIES School Sites Elementary _ Middle 0 0 0 0 High Parks Neighborhood 1 1.26 0 1.26 City of City of City of Miami City of Miami Miami City of Miami Miami City of Miami Coimun ty' 0 0 0 p Regional 1 22 8 30 * Waterfront Walkways 0 0 0 0 Commercial Recreation 2 3.o6 0 3.o6 See See See Attachment D Attachment 0 Attachment D Public Open Space 7 11.64 0 11.64 see S-e See Attachment E Attachment E Attachment E Subtotal TOTAL it 37.96 8 45.96 t. * Nate: All waterfront walkways at this point are dependant on the timing of 11!Private developments. There is no way to predict how many acres there will be. PHASE 11 PROPOSED OPEN SPACE COMMERCIAL RECREATION SPACES FACILITY ACREAGE RESPONSIBLE ENTITY N. River Drive Market Plaza 1.35 City of Miami/Leasee (Miami Avenue) South River Market Plaza 1.71 Land Owner(s) I i �p7rz 0 O` p I O i ++• �� y� qq fadsS�i�j j ( ,+fl� l l % , VIn I '+rfv+`$s l'.•tV'g ^aT 'i''+i1d •- it - . - l J �. :ill mixilik! 4.iiff=++.J 014 e ATTACHMENT E PHASE II PROPOSED OPEN SPACE PUBLIC OPEN SPACES FACILITY ACREAGE RESPONSIBLE ENTITY S.E. 12th Avenue Park 3.58 City of Miami/Adjacent Land M _ 1.. Claughton island Open Space DuPont Plaza Park River Quadrant Park N. 14th Street Park (E) 04 N. 14th Street Park (W) Brickell Point River Park 2.75 Land Owners) 1.42 Land Owner(s) 1.25 Land Owner(s) 0.39 land Owner(s) .75 City of Miami 1.5 Land Owner(s) 1 r1 , Y v , 4 i i No additional public parks are proposed beyond Phase il. Private parks and open space r are dependent on timing of private development. There is no way to project those at this time. 4 -=Am T--,rACE PRP A D 0 R ii-Y" —PA n K crmTnoL mmii rot'.4i BICENTENNIAL _Wd xLvir- SPECIALTY CRI eLklhlbltlll PARK —,6A0kYFRONT PARK Je 7' WALKER="---T--- PARK JC4 - - - ----- It MAR PARK_ FORT DAU PARK �-:SRICKEu "A"RAJ 4a IE74 BRICKELL PLAZA, PARK PARK ;6IMPGON PARK �I� , F=SCHWL-SITES DOMIN* PARKS IMMINEIARKSGHBORHOOD P COMMUNITY PARKS MREGIONAL PARKS M-29WATERFROW. WALKWAYS I= COMMERCIAL RECREATION MPUBLIC OPEN SPACE MAP H-2 EXISTING PUBLIC RECREATION MD C 'BEN SPACE 0% DOWN TOWNNiom ASTER PLAN ------------- 4 O 3 a ■ �__ — I T I L—!E Uf �Tj- L.�,1 I�^R - ! r ✓l�- �` "• ; axe .- Q rl i Am .,GOVERNMENT CENTER' OPEN $PACE I ix I .■.. . •�+.+... � it � ....� -- . -018CAYNE { '•, �J �I � BOULEVARD BA{CKELL EAIS nNG PRO IMADE! Q ALL EXISTING u OPEN SPACE PROPOSED PHASE 1 ova WATERFRONT WALKWAYS .. PUBLIC OPEN SPACE o.�a AT•i K.M AoW V-,4 *4 Wftft..W " A.Wft bl Ma MAP H-3 "PROPOSED PUBLIC REG.REATION AND OPEN SPACE DOWNTOWN ASTERPLAN PP. our . P` o.�.. r w. i ti� w: w ✓ �-.. r�.. � f i q e P vc 5 rc." No <1Li�^.s••- . 1"1 Question 13: HOUSING A. Complete table 13.1 Existing Housing EXISTING HOUSING Approxiamtely 12,000 people live approximately 79500 in the project area dwelling units. ------------------- which contains PERSONS TOTAL PER UNIT PERSONS OWNER RENTAL VACANCY -"28.85 - TOTAL OMNI - 1.70--3,216 -- T7fi -1,116 2,659 CBD 1.52 521 10 333 32.30 507 BRICKELL 2.09 8,218 354 3,578 9.20 4,330 TOTAL HOUSING UNITS ------------------------...-_-•---._----_--------- 11,955 1,140 5,027 7,496 Question 13: PROPOSED HOUSING B. Complete table 13.2 Proposed Housing P PERSONS NEW NEW NEW TOTAL PER UNIT EXISTING PHASE i PHASE 11 PHASE III UNITS ------------------ OMNI 1.70-"-_- -- ----- w -2,659500 340400 3,859 G CBO 1.52 507 1,000 800 1,020 3,327 BRICKELL 2.09 4,330 2,384 1,450 1,500 9j--------- -------------------------------- ----------------- TOTAL -j (� HOUSING UNITS 7,496 3.884 2,550 2,920 16,850 Based on Table 13.2 the total downtown living population may increase by 17,475 � - _ ,... .. .. .... 4:.::: . .. ... r... ,v . ..n::uJ }, y.} rY _.eax✓ s rw,a-.s._...T.,Ct1aw:,iM.u. .v.4 .. __ C- C-1- op ` DOWNTOWN DRI ROADWAY LINKS Roadway From To }s% SR 836/I-395 b.scayne Boulevard I-95 I-95 N.W. 27th Avenue fix.. Avenue Lejeune acad MacArthur Cswy. Alton Road Biscayne Boulevard Port Bridge Port of Miami Biscayne Boulevard _ R .... { N. 6th Street Biscayne Boulevard I-95 # Jr• rt N. 5th Street Biscayne Boulevard I-95 N. lst Street Biscayne Boulevard I-95 Flagler Street Biscayne Boulevard W. 2nd Avenue W. 2nd Avenue W. 27th Avenue S. lst Street Biscayne Boulevard S.W. 2nd Avenue S.W. 2nd Avenue S.W. 27th Avenue r " S. 7th Street Brickell Avenue I-95 I-95 S.W. 27th Avenue - S.W. 8th Street Brickell Avenue I-95 r I-95 S.W. 27th Avenue Coral Way Brickell Avenue S.W. 15th Road S.W. 15ta Road S.W. 12tt. Avenue S.W. 12th Avenue S.W. 27th Avenue jug Biscayne Boulevard N.E. 62nd Street N.E.'36th Street N.E. 36th Street I-395 I-395 Port Boulevard (/t Port Boulevard S.E. 2nd Street r 3 DOWNTOWN :)RI ROADWAY LINKS (CONTINUED) I.E. 2nd Avenue I-395 Flagler Street • Brickell Avenue S.E. 2nd Street S.E. 7th Street S.E. 7th Street Rickenbacker Cswy. N.E. lst Avenue N.E. 17th Street Flagler Street Miami Avenue N. 36th Street N. 17th Street N. 17th Street Flagler Street Flagler Street S. 15th Road S. 15th Road Rickenbacker Cswy. N.W. 1st Avenue N.E. 20th Street Flagler Street N. 2nd Avenue N.W. 20th Street Flagler Street Flagler Street S.W. 7/8th Streets I-95 N.W. 79th Street SR 112 SR 112 SR 836/I-395 SR 836/I-395 S.W. 8th Street S.W. 8th Street U.S.1 U.S.1 I-95 S.W. 17th Avenue S.W. 17th Avenue Douglas Road Bayshore Drive Rickenbacker Cswy. S.W. 27th Avenue 86-84c. C4 al. DOWNTOWN MIAMI DRI INTERSECTION TO BE ANALYZED Intersection Biscayne Boulevard/N.E. 19th Street N E. 2nd Avenue/N.E. 20th Street i N. Miami Avenue/N. 20th Street! N. Miami Avenue/N. 17th Street Biscayne Boulevard/N.E. 15th Street N. Miami Avenue/N. 15th Street N.W. 1st Avenue/N.W. 14th Street N.E. 1st Avenue/I-395 (North Ramp) N.E. 1st Avenue/I-395 (South Ramp) N.E. 2nd Avenue/I-395 (North Ramp) N.E. 2nd Avenue/I-395 (South Ramp) Biscayne Boulevard/I-395 r Biscayne Boulevard/N.E. 12th Street` N.E. 1st Avenue/N.E. 6th Street 4, N.W. 3rd Avenue/N.W. 6th Street r ,c N.W. 3rd Court/N.W. 6th Street =»4 Biscayne Boulevard/N.E. 5th Street r< N.E. 2nd Avenue/N.E. 5th Street :a N.E. 1st Avenue/N.E. 5th Street N. Miami Avenue/11. 5th St<<�-:!t • N.W. 2nd Avenue/N.W. 3rd Street Biscayne Boulevard/N.E. 1st Street N. Miami Avenue/N. 1st Street N.W. 2nd Avenue/N.W. 1st Street 8E�-84� c Intersection N.W. 2nd Avenue/Flagler Street S.E. 1st Avenue/S.E. 1st Street S.W. 2nd Avenue/S.W. 1st Street S.E. 2nd Avenue/S.E. 2nd Street S. Miami Avenue/S. 2nd Street Brickell Avenue/S.E. 7th Street S. Miami Avenue/S. 7th Street = S.W. 2nd Avenue/S. 7th Street S.W. 3rd Avenue/S.W. 7th Street S.W. 4th Avenue/S.W. 7th Street Brickell Avenue/S.E. 8th Street S. Miami Avenue/S.W. 8th Street x` S.W. 3rd Avenue/S.W. 8th Street r .. S.W. 4th Avenue/S.W. 8th Street ' Brickell Avenue/S.E. 13th Street �r S.W. 3rd Avenue/S.W. 15th Road/S.W. 13th Street .k Brickell Avenue/S.E. 15th Road s #Y S. Miami Avenue/S. 15th Road r r; Florida Department of Transportation 909 GRAHAM aovER«uR t"OVAt t DR.wpr i[CRETYI� Office of Planning and Programs Miami Regional Service Center 401 N.W. Second Avenue, Suite 510 Miami, Florida 33128 September 19, 1966 Mr. Kahart M. Pinder David Plummer & Associates, Inc. 4225 Salzedo Street Coral Gables, Florida 33146 Res Programmed Improvements in the Downtown Miami DRI Study Area Dear Mr. Pinders In response to your recent request for information on FDOT planned and programmed improvements in and around the Downtown Miami DRI Study Area, Michael J. Palozzi (District Program Development Administrator) r and I have researched the Department's Five -Year Work Program and offer the following list of pertinent projects: Fiscal Year, r 6113038 SR A1A fr. Watson road recon- 89/90 Island to w. and of struction - CST 129545 E. Channel Bridge 2 lane 6113279 Brickell Avenue replace mov- 88/89 over Miami River able span bridge CST 79572 6113376 Bifurcated Ramps road recon- 87/88 Surface Streets struction - CST 20077 2 lane 6113617 Biscayne Blvd. at intersection 86/87 N.E. 6th Avenue (major) CST ill 6122821 Part of Miami Bridge construct high 87/88 level bridge CST 19,826 6123072 Port of Miami Bridge construct high 86/87 level bridge CS-r 39:30 6123145 Port of Miami Bridge construct high 86/87 level bridge CST 19870 n • 8C-84 %': Mr. Kahart M. Pinder September 191, 1986• Page Two ' Fiscal Year, 6141769 I-95/SR 836 Interchange widen bridge 88/89 from NW 8 St. to SR 836 CST 59454 6141773 I-95 southbound exit provide 2 lane 86/87 ramp to SW 25th Rd. ramps to L from CST 600 SW 26th Rd. 6141774 I-95 from SR 836 to add 6th lane each 90/91 SR 112 side + southbound CST 159375 exit to NW 14 St. 6141846 I-95 HOV Bridge from construct 86/87 NW 12 Ave. on SR 122 to medium 1f-•el CST 229227 NW 49 St. on SR 9A bridge Please be advised that there are other projects in the work program that are either unfunded for construction, or are minor in the nature of their work mix (i.e., drainage, lighting, railroad signal). The Departeent routinely transmits only those projects which are (1) funded for construction in the next five years and (2) roadway widening and intersection improvement projects (those projects which may increase or decrease capacity on roadways which the consultant may be analyzing). Also, information is available on right-of-way and preliminary engineering costs for each project with funding source information for each phase. Should you require this or any other information, please do not hesitate in calling my office at (305) 377-5682. Sincerely, 74�L���� Michael T. Hoore Transportation Planner cci Michael J. Palozzi 86-840F TABLE I TRIP GENERATION MODEL EQUATIONS METRO DADE TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE PROJECT HOME -BASED PERSON TRIP PRODUCTIONS Work - + 1.51592 (Resident Labor Force) Shopping • + 1.05694 (Autos Available to Residents) +0.15161 (Resident Dwelling Units) Soc. Rec. - + 1.05553 (Autos Available to Residents) +0.94028 (Hotel -Motel Units) School • +0.59639 (Autos Available to Residents) Miscellaneous = + 1.22731 (Autos Available to Residents) +0.63507 (Hotel -Motel Units) ATTRACTIONS Work . +1.15657 (Total Employment) Shopping = +4.56067 (Retail Employment) Sm Rec. • + 344.67769 +0.12355 (Residential Population) +0.35032 (Commercial Employment) +0A?9'13 (HoteWotei Units) School • +0.78897 (K-9th Enrollment) +0.93520 (10th-College Enrollment). Miscellaneous = + 311.86060 + 1.04694 (Commercial Employment) +0.31910 (Total Employment) NON -HOME BASED TRIP PRODUCTIONS OR ATTRACTIONS Person • + 133.64201 +0.16273 (Total Home-Bosed Attractions) Taxi • + 0.02921 (Total Employment) +0.04067 (Hotel -Motel Units) Truck . +93.36358 +0.11745 (Autos Available to Residents) +0.16255 (Total Employment) SOURCE: Reference 11 I•y n„a a��5' r��� p > 811111111111 Tit11El t2It1A MISTIM - own IEEnIt to Im uueaesaauaaaauauaa u .awe44asaaaaae44eau�e�aaeaaf fgaasegleg4"apaaaapraa"aa4aap • • ..runaeaa4vaapa :: t1 TAPE It ►AAxIN9 Run 1: TIT! FUSON TRIPS, M t TWIT TRIP t7fD3 I will PF1= TRIP FJtD1 t AUTO Mi1E31 III? DU 11 MILT VAC13 USED I PEAK NMI PA11t:NE MAN asN JOTS »«.._.+»«»»»»«» »+».«.».»..++.««r._.._......«...__...»•.._ti»«.__»..«.� :i is ATTtICIICwi i IT ![ IT ICK I IT PURPOSE : IT tue<PDSE ti tit : NIa V.2x CT�i:t It PIS S TOTAL I - •- «».«.-•__ TOTAL I -----•------ TOTAL I ----- »---- TOTAL I= oftu t 1101111( OTO UIL &M I NM CM I vM aTFIEA 1: Tile TIRE 71"_ TIRE Ti.;c TIDE TIRE 1`104 I I :: UST4 MRS AE:'q U'1125 1 2f574 IARS 7..:i-A IMMI anN"salsa"Naeafaseeeeep.. Mllaaa'alaaaaaasa+saapapaapvast"fApslaaaiaua/aaffanapmfaaaaxvap+aaa:aaanifaamasl+afftslf: uafafl masts:::.wulRfaa�aafeainOslaas+e.aRwf arsaefsafaa •31 :: 11,712 1: 16,16E 2A,1.t S,/34 42,E56 I 1,64 2,631 1,571 2,115 4,314 1 14,112 24,141 31,341 1 11,n1 15,451 26,112 :: 341 3,332 3,*- 4,433 ; 133 7,173 32a 1,142 :: is t tit n n1 : St 3.1 + 1.3 + 11.3 + 2.3 4; ,ST :: 51,345 1.: 147,51E IE7,t.4ls 41,TIS 317,/31 t 31,7N 11,131 11,616 52,942 62,721 1 36,727 1",503 254,312 r 45,312 132,459 177,341 :: 144 21,'MI 5,5.: 42,332 ; IIS 4,233 us 1,212 t! t nt in lilt : 6.1 + 3.3 + 11.1 + 7.4 4: 'Al :i 61,E57 rl IU,5M 28t,'.•U 47,741 331,MS 1 32,666 14,576 12,233 54,117 47,2421 71,111 221,733 212,631 t 36,733 147,118 214,653 ;: 113 27,347 3j.: 66,111 1 7111 1,236 lit 11,ul in in: tt ii : : •• : .: 17,233 :I 25,E3J 17,tV 12,111 135,*U t 3,117 1,211 173 twn 12,10 r 22,143 121,141 142,941 1 17,634 82,324 ","1 :1 2,733 4,356 1,6'' 41,243 1 311 1,111 i31 3,3" t in n It: i :: 5.3 + 3.3 + 11-C 4 7.4 4: SIM 6,MS :t E,144 tS,t56 1,32E 34,112 1 1,261 1,515 1,143 1,721 2,844 1 1,729 22,519 31,311 1 6,"1 14,117 21."1 1; 1,31111 2,412 4.5 6,474 1 7S1 M 73 1,311 Otl1;: It I in it III 1 .. 4.1 . 2.3 + 11.x + 4.4 4: ll t: 37,645 11 56,4lt M,7.1 U,L% IS3,M 1 5,149 11,271 4,297 1,151 13,3471 31,311 11,62/ 111,121 1 41,111 56,M 17,122 :: 1,M 11,233 6.5 71,351 1 741 4,171 73 2,0 .. :: r n n nI I 6.1 4 '1 2.31 11.t 4 1.1 4: .. •« 4+ :: ante :: &sam eefaru aa:e"t : aueasa i eepaa Ysm sasses alas I &seat 1 songs" aaaaa I *mile Iea"ae aaafaa now"" :: "as ama fat., tea" 1 a*afg a&sa sa" aep� : arAl:: 131,611 :: IIS,111 314,6:4 121,741 712,411 1 42,111 52,741 11,665 R,M3 15,59 1 153,IM 4 4,151 416,911 :ln,471 311,162 424,434 1: 3,131 M,123 12,111 142,114 : 1,131 11,134 1,111 11,112 I M 141 1421 ; Si lon+,{onaasN+Wt&ssMWis. a&sWtestaaa0a+aafaeaaaasssaaslata&saapasaaaafN&soa"a7avaaaataasa,a"ana"aaaaaasiNaaaaaaaaiff"ff aua _ ..al1J=afp,aap"fapaYaonont*onapSam -I ■? fMMTill11 IOU i1MIUMi ITIM - MiEI111E WON to HIS 3d♦6 ,..0 n , YMLlf.arpiappppY�40tltlp.M • -pu~� u pnsiusa !t It • tlarf it .. r>rRK1n1IE>rAM� tt :A •1 1t 10� .sue.-..... TI10 DIP Em t TAyltlti TIl! El1II ,•.r, ! AtiTO:EIit11 i17P 171Ti i AtirO i1PYT1 T1Pt E1LS It tMtlT sect, 04i1 rfaK s?OiA PARKtMi i1SEA1E ItTt a: to 8TT111iTi t r=11T1I TOTAL t IT HI1aRo tT MK t _ IT PJVM I Ir MAtPGSE it it tip C.A 1 bttli ITIIE>1 ibtl PA 1 TOTAL 1 TOTAL :1 VON iTO i NM ITi4;t1 :i Yin Yin -- - r;°.: Tin TM TIDE i atspHpppaq/.pM WO.MTw a .asMraaaets®1�Y.��11/tea/R![.iillp'11ptgM4lttt�iMl.i.A.��...plpgafsllfR.af REM U►4S 1[- a UcnS ilpMAff tlfAplLtttt#Af1,9R111AsH!!x! alaRlawfRla#IRai r - .. qtflMafTs1M+RRAfleteliR.lA\lttw�w�M}I111.R,�gan� IESTI 14%;s 1EM uns OUT is 9,I221 ti 12,314 3:,417 1,461 33,3I2 1 1,3162 1,171 in 1,714 2,314 I ii,fl2 21,If3 32,10 1 $,163 14,I11 23,134 :: 314 4,133 3,Iti 31741 113 I'M 317 1,;34 ;s t1 :•�T I to I 31 nI 3.1 EAST :: St,34U it it 77,i24 i1:,311 3I,162 771,166 t 23,34! 11,731 7,611 36,611 I 44,2" t SIM 111,614 233,466 1 41,421 121,131 141,243 ;: 413 23,111 3,. t 33,411 111 3,747 SM 7,233 S in 42 16t: i is 4.1 . I.3 • IS.P ♦ 7.6 IT JAL ;; CIf :; 34,77t I it MUT SEt,LT7 42,521 31I,167 1 21,113 If,IU I,3" 31 3M 4&633 1 62U•4 231,371 244 434 1 51,211 136 124 116 317 is "1 I+ 2+4 1 E.+ 34 21I 1 , 111 3,342 113 I'm 1 J6t 4t ISIf 1 i; .. 16,151 11 it 25,I:t 1.4338 21,673 147,f.52 t 2,U2 6,i62 2I1 0,714 1,414 1 22,273 113,143 131,117 1 17,021 71,7" 44,21 :: 2,79 4,141 1,6:1 37,n3 t 312 2,1MI I53 3,317 1 ilt 31 bti l t: S.3 • :,1 a 11.i • 7,4 �: 5,431 1: I 1,447 14,17[ 2,T14 II,312 1 1,172 1,321 NI 1,712 2,3121 7,375 11,333 23,411 1 3,fM 12,217 I1,1ir :: 1,111 1,731 t:i 3,184 : 251 N6 73 I'm Y IS I In i tl Itt i t 4.3 • 2.1 ♦ 11.4 :Ell :: 27,3t3 :1 41,16E SS,4ls 24,6)1 124,346 1 2,434 4,311 1,321 51441 7,2491 t :i 31,111 79,174 111,277 1 38,411 31,531 12,112 :1 1,234 34,344 1,. 1+,r+t 211 4,411 13 2,32I n 31 611It PAL :: 114,SI5 a 10,331 343.543 113,Is3 612,IY I U^ 31,5211 II,5111 54,IIi 63,21/ 1 1A,614 417,121 $47,117 :114,411 271,542 Ii3,91I iI 3,131 44,114 12,124 127.171 : 1,IM 13,472 I,1Si 17,5M t 213 n t[II 1 Ii caacarwpaesaaaaHaaaaaupaaasaa upaa....afppa.epppesprr•taataasapapppauav„aaw,r�saa�a.. •.asww.,a Wild EAUTEE t1IP 1/1E1 1•511 . WPM TIMMM If h-Kin 31ACEI 01/ MCLOOK1ES: 41� 1.29 eT11E1t 1.i4 a� TOTAL 1.43E 1 � (D t10 nu T1 m 1T11mmillit'1- now 9EY na RE " !-M anra wbawsnanfrtaubfwaua 1 i .•raaNpusbtN+afbMrb+ttbbtlf�b ffb*fbNbpppbbpbf♦bafftrafBnff nttllnfraRnt • • • • bb :: i t 1RIP1 .. ►4AKIIQ W.1%3 3 it wM ;. PLO- it TOTAL PUS M TRIP 066 1 TL4151T TRIP EM/S 1t in PERl011 TRIP E1413 t AUTO 4RIVER TRIP EKDS :: DAiLT SPAZ:i =3 : PEAK 4" P#Atlq. USCAGE :1 Dtaatw if 6TTIACTIO63 I 11 WON 1T ii06E It IT ►ORPOR t 11a PLRMSE .. Mtc 0:10 y�aK DraE1F it 1005 it --- FOBS TOM I TOTAL 11 » TOTAL. 1 --»__..._ TOTS •. .r «.._»_.,_ , ^»____ ._... IM Ito 1 UM OTHER RAIL NIS 11 UM OTHER t Vw OTh" I WE IM. Tlr: Ti►E 1 7iCE 71n THE TINE 1 11 REM W3 AL- i "is #ES- U42; VS►R (114S •pff,tifnpff+Inb{/fnflf•afAt�nNAtfnbfYbiblfrlfffppnf{ff�aYWfaiffaKWWrHplttfff•bf•it@nffbpf.tlqlsTlf4OltltllkfStwflllf.bfllRtf t•sgtOtfsfaQt... r gs,itwtw•A/..elwwwmt tRettt Sx.ttfRflltRtftl,fltlb 13,SS1 is 21,323 21,761 1,491 1 51,411 i 2,711 3,1114 2,435 1,151 11 3,1116 11 ;1 17,414 21,171 43,443 1 14,1T1 17,t:33 31,144 :i 321 6,743 I,:aa 3,63 1.2 3.747 324 2,211 1: f In 1R ilia : t1 3.1 !.3 • I1.A + 2.5 + 1 ,5T :: 64,t11 :1 "JiS 216,4T9 44,319 341,923 t 37,325 37,20 14,121 61,443 74,514 it 61,141 225,4" 217,311 1 49,472 131,444 251,934 1s All 24,)36 3,5:: 71,232 11/ S,744 321 1,243 311 141 ?fill t is 4.1 • 3.5 + 11 1 • 7.4 + -n1 !AL :; 79,161 ;: 111,491 24: '. 53,122 413,412 1 41itU 41,154 16,771 63,614 11,391 It 71,454 253,561 333,6n I 43,563 169,311 232,M II 31,312 1,8,: 73,163 1 7" 1/,4+4 M 11,472 ,o I I; 17,)11 ti 2i,614 11:.'_i 34,464 I64,Ii6 t /,95i t2,Mt 1,131 15,tN 17,111 ti 21,7111A,531 139,24/ : 17,374 93,111 111,342 s: 2,734 3,137 .-v! 43,344 sn I,m in 6,ln 91 limit 5.3 3.4 + 11 + 7.4 4 1 7,947 :1 11,771 11': 1? 11,233 41,913 1 1,494 1,639 1,472 1,461 3,132 t1 11,217 27.493 37,771 1 1,271 10,191 26,413 i1 1,191 3,111 S." 1,271 1 251 1,111 73 I,lu IOtpa! : :1 1 fit it 1T: : 4.1 + 2.4 * it • 4.4 . ut Ii 41,115 :1 74,1T1 73,^ 1 31,IT2 I16,324 1 1,141 11,111 7,699 11,451 11,157 :1 63,11" 112,231 IN,1H 1 32,743 64,M 117,5» :1 1,211 25,in 3.a 31,433 7" 3,137 75 3,1" .. 1 fit 1 R 112;1 S1 1 4.1 • i 2.3 + l;.a .. --- N pafasw ii aeabp ere-.■ peapf aamaa i aaffa abet aapb memo -apa it .. memos Rome" ammus i feama amoom *eawaa i1 *veto fw.fn afwt,. tewewe wane* wewfef fafaaaar 1: t it i -DIAL:: 154.676 1: 232,914 41;j 3 141,9113 1164,144 1 54,436 64,162 27,991 91,111 111,691 11 171,178 521,121 411,217 1 141,912 S44,3S1 411,23A 1: S,I51 13,111 12,11. 161,177 ; 1,131 22,366 1,103 22,471 1 241 ill lStit i it sap+NrpapaeeYaffaffMaa•• .. Is bYafaftlbMbb+nrfWfffflbOnl+raW fbfffnttlblbYa►Nbnf W/41*rf/tfa,{f .. ,rflnaub�nn+*wbnn r DAVID PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS May 22, 1986 Mr. Rod Arroyo, Assistant Director South Florida Regional Planning Council 3440 Hollywood Boulevard - Suite 140 Hollywood, Florida 33021 Re: Downtown Miami DRY - #5151 Dear Mr. Arroyo: This letter will confirm our conversation of today during which we discussed the appropriate capacity analysis methodology to be used in preparing the ADA for the Downtown Miami DRI. As we discussed, intersection capacity analysis required for the first 5-year increment will be conducted using the Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) procedures from Circular 212. Rod, your attention and expeditious response to this matter is appreciated. Very truly your i / art M,r Pinder 1W/vm1 - MAY86V Ccz Mr. Joyce Meyers Mr. Thomas Thomson Mr. Charles Baldwin Mr. Jorge Southworth 422E SALZEDO 6TREET • CORM 4"LAa • FLORIDA 33144 -849 .- - U l II III Ili dill III III l IIIII�ill��I�ll�ili�il�il �I �d li liI� flilldl'�Ir�i�IldVllii�liil 111 I .rd• MI Mw NUF� still IQ I[Pn.41 11) 1 :vtltl It[>[NlIM fa•s•rIN 1 t--mot M• 1: 1 Will In SAW 1 to III t M? • 1 : 1 am tf IMt A [ad IeertP/a Mlti•11 t alla.l•lat 1 t 31M • 3 t i 1 1 1 e 31 Y t lfBltl—�: Mt. t, : , --: Stall i i3tNiTil — l •��—'�1 tOWNP —I it7t t HIft1ILL.!"•StfAt� ~ •IAtE.. Mal t nor Owwe• t now t"Ost *W t now 1sM•U. M•INA•i bets —f1 1•Il-- �'--^ torftw BINr nMN INUq laid fart. AtNI .•tN�^k'N t nw Mtke : no, •: Nt t rim i nor wui a tail twlly as" �•t••M 1. 1�. t ! • w, t ltl�tl tN [+1•Bst: tN blla'11�1wN•S tns P+Ia1Nt(+IsfMi t*1gNl:t irN •NN 10101Nt[•NaBNtG11•IM Ir•t "UK: •M. t .i.7Nt: tN t bw P epottol"ott bill IeRas LOW —#ells h% I.1 air bta lB. I". IONIC MO Ilk. 11. has If•/t. halals ha• I01. ,Mai hM— 5"te tl.ih_- loss Joe me J16• .--------1 Iy.BI. h6a f•.Bl.--- J•aa fq.Bl. •F•/t. hat . —r1.M ~•I7t ---- —Isa• �#.•.s 6.44 4.44 2.71 S-M—�� RetS •.FSt 1.3Ti i.M -t t.i3 1.82 1.12 ••s3 llsa tattl-1 Fr.Ttf !e+.I1.tB Pr. As Par.MF 6etaa7N tiJN h►.711 Ihr. ism ►1e.1[R Its." FW." —.-- hr.ltt<'•w�R'i .. ► e a Itl•N a , ITS • t ►IleltF4L t C 1 ! e / e • • • • / / • ► • • e • e # • s # s 1 a Wla•• a ils t0 3T1 M 1IF 1 P C 1 f MME • IS1 a ell In 97 NT1 • ! • • / • • • • ► a fTeEl• 1 IiH iM is n l liallll TZT C f IIIM 1 TD a tell STT MT 11tS 1 1 1 • e ► # • e ► 1a9•ae 1 na en ete >• t 0 C t f IMM f 34 a TU 3q 471 M • 1 IM" 3T3 / e ► • • • , • Sl•• 1 > rS I l 1111t 3tS t C 1 / / • / • • a • 1 a e • / e • • • • • a a ► 1 RT•M a 1 111s ►Iul • 1 f C If1/Me {E!C 1 ! / e / 1 I • • a • e a a a • / • • ! + ► 113Se• 1 1 Ina •1 1 it1 V9 t e t3lM • tI 1 • • • • • • • a f ► / • , # tern 1 # ISM IM I1M a f 1v61M t>a• / t 31lM • a / e a • • 6 • 1 • • a • • • f • a 1 i177s• ♦ 1 tIM 11M ZITS 3 31T1M tilt P E t 2331M a 11)1 / f 1 • • a • 1 • • / • ► • # • 1 s e131s•• a Te 7Hs 1IN lla 1 t11TM6 1111 P 6 It17M / sit 6 3N to 111 •3a 1 I • 1 • • • • ► + ! *rises s ♦ 17•• 11v6 16 1 v/!1M lTtt e • t►M • 11 ! a e • • I • • • • I • ! • ► • i • 31SM a 1 "Ml • I. l 1 e13M STS t • ! E ! f f • • 1 • • 1 • • • 1 f • • e # 1fZ1FM s 177a MM •3T1 .L 1 1 117im T1fe e 1 g11M ! Ni • lTie 11N If1• 3a1 • • • • a • f • e • M2M a 1 2711 1711t ttTll 30 1.1 11 1 11071t 1111E ! 1 121M! f 3f3 • I • 1 6 • 6 • a • 1 6 / 1 • e # ts11M 1 : Tln 1131 A t S e7t•M I/M 1 • IUE• • f1 • ! • • a • • • • # • a s # s + 1 s • • .l I I f F • 6 • 6 • • • • • • • • 1 ; ; • • # a a • • • • 16 6 f e • • 1 6 • I • • • • • • a ! 1 a 1 • • • It • • • • • • • a I • • 1 • • ► • 1 1 # # • • R 6, I 6 1 137 1 116 fft 3" NT1 • f • • • • • • • • a ! Ifia•a a at• tts tT• 3A ItiMl 113 • I 11111 ! O • 1 a • • I 1 • • ! a a 31.13t1 ! t3# Ilia a UMN t3f113 II W U34 tW =W 433 1173 IN to 111 • • • • • • • • • • # a 3Azle • ma MT? asv/ nW tSFf► a 1 11 1 3, 1 • 11Pt11 I at a VTe 11" 106 30 1 11�M J/1 1 1 I I • 1 • • 1111M i Iv7• 1111 1.3• N e11 3min N3 a • IIMf a It • 14M oil M an I • • • • e • • 6 • a ! • • a • 1 1 6 6 • • • • 6 • • • • • ! !i now um 111/1M SIX 11►11M 3S11M un tin 1N1 1fl1 31M 11M 6 • ima Iel I a a t / 11111111101111 6 W 440 MD i1N 24-Sep-Bi M 45:16 I' `dNT011N NIM1 mi F ;SON RIPS CALCUTION 1;._Y DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING PREVIOUS INCREIENTSI S[eeulot 1 <------t 1"2 a 1 Approved(l) l 1997 = 2 Allowable( 1 ; 2005 = 3 M ATTA (s6op1 Coestut ffiffffffff f1.368201 a ATTRACTIONS- ------- —-------•—-------1 ti0N-R40ME RASED- ------------- --1 TOTAL Parcel -------•------------- Area ; Bork ----- --------------- Shop Soc.Rec. School Misc. Total : Nork Shop Soc.Rec. School Misc. Total : Person Taxi Truck Total : OMNI 1 1 0 0 —------------ 0 0 ----------- 0 —--------------------------------------------------------------- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -------------------------------------- 0 0 0 0 091 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 572 0 173 0 676 1421 231 14 40 326 174 OWN 3 1 7" 521 31B 225 462 2405 270 319 214 0 318 1121 182 7 32 271 379 OTPN 1 4 1224 797 409 344 708 3681 884 37 471 0 1044 2436 396 22 192 610 672 OTPN 2 4 .726 473 361 204 420 2185 496 74 271 0 596 1429 232 12 110 314 396 OTPN 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 283 0 86 0 334 703 114 7 40 161 86 CID 1 2• 0 0 0 0 0 0 10206 0 0 0 2916 13021 2119 249 1134 5802 1692 CID 2 3 ; 0 0 0 0 0 0 1B06 56 547 0 2133 4141 739 44 234 1037 557 CBD 3 3 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 1600 62 485 0 1390 4057 660 39 225 124 498 CBD 4 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 2528 1608 766 0 2796 7989 1224 62 335 1701 958 CID 5 3 ; 320 208 159 40 165 962 0263 436 2556 0 9737 21014 3420 702 1177 4800 2677 CID 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2070 22 627 0 2445 3143 840 31 291 1132 634 NICKELL 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 315 0 95 0 372 787 127 3 44 179 96 NICKELL 2 5 2738 1784 1362 749 1583 8235 9569 556 3353 0 11300 24776 4032 234 1496 3762 3877 NICKELL 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 14703 472 4454 0 17363 36194 6020 359 2066 9443 4544 NICKELL 4 5 : 0 0 0 0 0 0 2474 136 749 0 7922 6292 1022 60 348 1430 771 PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ��_:----T99 0 0 � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Og11 52l «» _398 ----225 ---462 ----- 2405 —y 841 319 ------ -----388 --------- 0 9'i1 25�M--Y 2 --N---..----- 4t4 21 163 -- 597 — 534 OOYiIm 320 200 159 90 185 962 26473 2203 4991 0 22029 3560 9062 446 1738 13446 7009 NICKELL '2rA 1784 1362 769 15BS 8235 27060 1165 8651 0 31958 68834 11201 660 3935 15816 9768 OVERTOMM/P1 19M 1271 970 548 1128 586e 1663 111 828 0 1964 43" 743 41 342 1125 1155 11 PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 go—»------------------------._._._»— __»»---»---_--___-------------------•---------------------------------- ----- ----------------------------------- xPA STUDY AREA 5807 IM 2888 1632 335I 17468 56030 3797 14847 0 56945 131627 21420 1368 9197 30985 18008 Val M �.r!All 100KUP TABLE 08s4Sst1 Area name Null Onni CID Nest CID East OvertlPV Brictell t%'M ORN NIMI III Area 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 ;,'!10 TRIPS CALCULATION 1992 NS 0.00 0.398 0.289 0.469 0.080 0.211 0,tid DEVELOPMENT INCLUDINS PREVIOUS INCRPW1997 KS 0.00 0.442 0.241 0.400 0.067 0.10 Yeart I <------5 1992 = 1 2005 NS 0.00 0.472 0.215 0.360 0.059 0.174 Approvedtllt 1 1917 s 2 Allorabtet 1 ; 2005 = 3 l DAILY PEAK HOUR AUTO TRIPS- --------- CHECK------------------- Person Node Auto Auto Intrat.1 External Tro-flay Inbound Outbound Net Trip Rate --------- Parcel Area Trips Split P.Trips Trips int.% Auto T. (Auto Trips per 1060 SFl Conversion Factor-----) 1.43 01 0.086 -- 0.30 ----- 0.70 --------------------------- Two-Vay Inbound C%%bound (Transit) Per.lAutoOverall 1 PH/Daily Inbnd t Outbnd 1 ONNI 1 1 0 0.40 0 0 51 0 0 - 0 ----- 0 --------------- 0.000 •----------- 0.000 0.000 ONNI 2 1 1747 0.40 1051 735 51 699 60 18 42 0.539 0.162 0.377 out 3 1 3797 0.40 2286 1598 51 1519 131 39 91 1.519 0.436 1.063 OTPN 1 4 6727 0.00 6161 4329 201 3462 299 89 202 1.692 0.509 1.184 OTM 2 4 $967 0.08 3650 2552 201 2042 176 53 123 0.445 0.133 0.311 OTPN 3 4 844 0.08 795 556 201 445 38 t1 27 0.614 01209 0.486 CID 1 2 ILB24 0.29 11962 8365 51 7947 683 203 478 0.344 0.103 0.241 CID 2 3 5572 0.47 2962 2071 51 1969 169 51 lie 0.473 0.142 0.331 CID 3 3 4981 0.47 2645 1849 51 1757 151 45 106 0.472 O.t42 0.330 CID 4 3 9528 0.47 5091 3560 51 3382 291 87 204 0.629 0.189 0.440 CID 5 3 26776 0.47 14210 9943 51 9446 812 244 569 0.491 0,147 0.344 CID 6 2 6147 0.29 4512 3156 51 2998 258 77 180 0.636 0.191 0.445 BRICKELL 1 5 961 0.21 758 530 52 504 43 13 30 0,707 0.212 0.495 BRICKELL 2 5 38773 0.21 30512 21393 5% 20323 1748 524 1223 0.910 0.273 0.637 BRICKELL 3 5 45440 0.21 35B52 25071 51 23816 2046 614 1434 0.703 0.211 0.492 HICKELL 4 5 7712 0.21 6065 4253 51 4042 348 104 243 0.701 0.210 0.491 PORT 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 S1 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 ONNI 5544 3337 2134 2217 191 57 133 T 1 1 loom 70093 41390 26944 27497 2365 709 1655 3 1 T BRICMLL 92886 73287 51250 48687 4187 1256 MI 3 1 2 OVERTOWM 115M 1063S 7434 5949 512 153 359 3 1 T PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 STUDY AREA IBM 129M 89963 84330 7254 2176 5071 AREAS It35..N135 AMPS A133..0198 PORT 840 190 DATA At..Af66 FULL Al. X71911 IM PORT 1620 S80 i w-ft&Avltl t"A1 q l 1 T7 c nno c-M fi 1GFh '1►1 1 ' fill, f .M IAI1� � Ml ELK Nis !i1C11 a1 K*Ml[bt MMI•c !lt/Fllt ttisulttl ' Ike•wfa I a--«•: t/R • 1 : : fMi M NU 1 f1J/rnNl f : t111 / 1 : ' t IDI m bN m led IIwilm I11cm i YIrM1NB : 7•a • 1: : 1 7 1 • s 1 . « .»«.•_'«_.- «»»«_..» td•. @4ItF—_.: Mr, r • IR• — : EIIR —««. _«.._.»._ _._. .._._._... ._._^...« ...::::.«__....«. «»__._: NfIEl11l » _ «___'_.«.: •mewl — LMI�--••-��'S %n .« «««� .: I MH KJ§GL fit e1•IOt�--•�i�t�•"»- MN 1 new tnnh t n•w br*il R•M t now to ew. temnM•: owe ealtAc►:: nor ma tANhq fslM t•••wc. It/ne nt YN : FIAT 1111196: no., srwr•M : nnr : new •t•11 !tell 110111M tirar F. M.: 1 (*@IMI YN G•iq•MS a," ItAlmm'(01•I•N: Yw 1sllgnt "lqM: fol•IM:: Im Ismmost• t+le}w ho"e•t[AI►Fw1' Yn IselhMi: ia.:yfshlt: Ysb : Y►s INIe•ss1L►Ilfsni Ysls Mon tt•e► «»—»�.r» «____._�._».r—__..... ............. —------------------- _-------- —....«»..«««. ........ ......... ..»«........ ««... .........»._.-.-----.-----«»»««« I.I. Mln lotw 1. h/. Iwn JM 14.11. ml 14.F1. Stews his SI•F1. JA+ Jsh 1w, his .Ft t•. Msn /.•.s JMs Jos .........»-1 1/•tl. Jots %.Ft. hiss t1.1t. 14.Ft. ilk Ms --------- ----- ----- —----------- .. .-.-..------------------------------------------------ .............. .....__•...........---««_»»._«..__•.-_—_.._._»..__.._..«._»»__.«—__.._—_—._"^_—_—»—»----'---------•---- /.It 4.10 1.11 1.0 /.W 0.•31 1.127 LN IA /./174 1.33 1.41 1.41 Lt1 as Fwtw-.t •w.Ita `e.1ty ew.1131, Ar.rw Mtn11• tw.l11 q/ •w. M.am t'w.rtlf its." Per." hr." FW. Its Par. ............... -.......................................... ._..-........... .............. .... _.......... • • • ._. 1 »«..................................... • • • • -_........_........__-'--------•------------------•----------...._--•---•----._.._-.... / ► ► • • • e • A•IIe 1/1 1/1 1 • :In11 s 7 YI 111 l ® 6 b 'eie 1t • • • • • • ► 13•oN D► / • • 1•Iw w set A a 1na#M a , ua 7Hi 11 t 11/•01 171J ts/c:0 Is1M / / 1 1 1 1 1 / / • • > / 7�►n i w 3711 11/t R 1 low loot ! 1 Mil ! K • so In 111 ei/ a � a a e • • / e 0 • 1 1 1 1 • I • / 1 • • • 1 • / • • • ! • i 9 / • 1 8 • e • 1 • 1 • • • • • • ► • 1 • • • • i • 1 A # Is i 1 7MM• 11 q/ s11M x x 1 # A#eeM 1/ i :3N 313 Ix 7 S71►M Nsi • L� • !/IM 1 Ix 0 • • 1 • • • 7M 1 7M • • • • • • • • • • N.• Y A•sIM # i 113• YIM el/ 3 5311.0 NO e • rim • i)t • • • • • • • • • A • ! a A n • • 1 • • ! �• 1 / • 1 • • • • • • • • / 7!/ 1 / • • • ► s 1 11•eM• 1� i t3,1 53s/ N1 • 3 IMIMO eok 1 1 I71/11 ! N1 • I • • • M M rM: • / 1 • / • , s 17•!1n a Inn +a•1 ii1J 317 2 IN1010 sIN o / 7/111t / $1! • "0 W ISI 1371 / • / • ► / • • e • a a •*• + • • 1 S 1 • • • ► • / 1 to an 614 IM 1 • • • • • / • ! • e # 1n a • • 2 s e / c / • • • 1 iM 21• ]/t 1M • • / I • 1 • • • • / e s 11t1•N 17 a nA su7 tU . 7 f IaM•0 NO2 1 / 2►7eM • n1 • • • • • Ilt lit • • • • • • • • 1 / • 1 • 111sM1 inw *M3 AMI t)e r 1 S tt30►M 1131 e / 810 • 271 1 11/ IM 71/ 331 In to 1 I / • / • 1 A A s A ! • • I ! 0 I • • / / 1 • 1 • 1 1 • • / • • • e a , i a / • d • • 1 • 1 • 1 1 • • 1 • • I • • • ► •• # • i i a • / 11 • • 1 • • 1 • 1 1 • / 1 A ► ♦ • i i a b • 1 • • • 1 Im IsttA U1 s11M • Ix 1 9M 237 7x �IM r1 I nm 7f1 1 e • loam M M x 1 3+ee t 9•I11M M 17M/M a /s► `s1 if" 1a17 I" tax tes71 1x 11N » 1•efw/ slow IMA • �. • i7MM • Ila • I•M Us An 1327 in in 7l/M m3 MM 11 e3/ 1 31eM • x • • # • 373NM 3• n• lvla INl1 eN SMO M Im / 1 7SIeM • IM 1 7a1 1S7 Im PA n1l 711 ► • • • 1 / • 1 • • 1 t 0 • • � • • e � I • • 1 • I 1 1 1 • 1 1 • • • • • • • 1 i • A 1 • • • 1 • / • • • 1 1 • • • 1 • • / • • / • 1 • IN 1 :711 mu 2ul 4111 tm an M 3111101111111 It W low IN JN "A M IMs//11 low me IM Will 7•I• ... •� it x724 tam bu 111111 • to �r A� W , A 24-Sep-86 08:47s08 OF: NT0181 NlAfil tRl FE45ON TRIPS CALCULATION (NEW DmOPwff INCLUDING PREYIOOS I8C1lElEMTSI knariot 1 <-- 1"2 = 1 Approved( ) 1997 = 2 Allorab:e(1) 1 2005 = 3 HDII ATTR (shop) Constallt fffffffffff f1.366201 + i-) _»_»_»»____»»____--»--_ QXE-BASED PRODUCTIONS----------------....---------1 HtNIE-BASED ATTRACTIQHS_»___«-_»_»-----«--«-1 l.iM-HOME t<ASfD-----------------1 TOTAL Parcel Area 1; —VDrk Shop SOc.Ric. School Mist. Total 1 Mork Shop Soc.Rlc. School misc. Total 1 Person Taxi Truck Total 1 «_____»« •. _____»__ y--»_»»____«__ »__»-------- ------- ----------- - ------------- --------------------- ------------_--«--- O"kII 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 328 0 50 0 239 617 100 8 46 155 77 O1U112 l °''' 0 0 0 0 0 0 3961 56 767 0 3386 8170 1329 97 557 1993 tots ORI11 3 1 •• 493 322 243 IN 265 1484 3704 l30 1204 0 4375 9413 1532 90 348 2170 1306 am 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OTPN 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OTPU 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CID 1 2 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CID 2 3 + 0 0 188 0 127 315 3025 165 1081 10 4000 1103 1491 102 538 2120 1153 CID 3 3 R 0 0 0 0 0 0 3697 927 i117 0 4354 10084 1641 90 519 2249 1733 CID 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CBD 5 3 r 0 0 423 0 206 709 6415 556 2159 0 7576 16704 2719 175 902 3795 2121 CBD 6 2 to 987 643 491 277 571 2969 5762 742 1909 0 6805 15219 2476 141 364 3481 2166 BRICKELL 1 5 ; 1036 675 515 291 599 3117 0 0 172 0 0 172 28 0 37 35 337 BRICKELL 2 5 592 386 294 166 342 1781 0 0 99 0 0 98 16 0 33 49 192 'BRICKELL 3 5 t 0 0 165 0 111 276 6425 983 2030 0 7588 17025 2771 164 903 N37 2113 BRICKELL 4 5 + 395 257 361 111 339 1463 10482 315 3325 0 12380 26502 4313 263 1495 6071 3403 PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -------- - -- ---J - --- -- -___ ----- ------ ---------- -------------------------------------------------------------- 01N1I 493 322 245 139 285 1464 7994 185 2021 0 9000 13200 2962 191 till 4306 23" KIAw 987 643 1102 277 783 3993 19689 2410 6266 10 22733 51111 83t7 307 2322 11646 6674 IRICKELI 2023 1318 1335 569 1392 6637 16907 1298 5625 0 19968 43799 7127 427 2438 10442 6047 0070"m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 STl18r ARFA 3503 2283 2683 984 2661 12115 445" 3693 13912 10 50704 1131" t0406 1129 6441 23996 13122 ���i� ��� �il�i�� �I�' II ��i�������ll�l� I I�Il�ll�li��llill Ili dllllllll� illil I�III �� lip II �I�IIII I�III IIu ul4lli A, k KDOt iPLil LOOKUP TABLE 08t47110 Area east Null Onni CID Vest CBD East Overt/PV Brickell t JTOM NIANI Ml Area # 0 1 2 3 4 3. i,.10 TRIPS CALCULATION 1992 WS 0.00 0.398 0.289 0.469 0.060 0.211 P . V DEVELOPMENT INCLUDIN PREVIOUS INCREIEKT1997 NS 0.00 0.442 0.241 0.400 0.067 0. IM Yeart M a I zm WS 0.00 0.472 0.215 0.360 0.039 0.176 Approvedl 1 t"? z 2 Al lovable 2005 a 3 4QLY PEAK HOUR AUTO TRIPS---------- CHECK -------- - "W -mm Inbound Outbound --------------- Not Trip Rat We Auto Parcel Am , ___.: -- Trips - ---- Split - ------ - P.Trips -------- Trips - - -- - -- Int.1 Auto T. - -- - ------------------------ (Auto Trips ;or 1000 SF) Conversion Factor----!) 1.43 01 0.086 0.30 0.70 -------- --- Two-Vay Inbound 0.;aovind (Transit) - Per./Auto0verall I PH/Daily Wed I Outbnd I ONNI 1 1 772 0.40 - 465 - - -- - - - ------- 325 - - - - ---------------------------- 51 309 27 a 19 - - - ------------------ 0.133 0.040 - -- 0.093 MINI 2 1 10153 0.40 6112 4274 51 4060 349 105 244 0.230 0.069 0.161 ORN 1 3 1 13068 0.40 7867 5501 51 5226 449 135 315 0.611 0.183 0.429 OTP1 1 4 0 0.02 0 0 201 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 OWN 2 4 0 0.08 0 0 20% 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 OTPI 3 4 0 0.08 0 0 201 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 Cm 1 2 0 0.29 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 m 2 3 11538 0.47 1127 4284 51 4070 350 105 245 0.368 0.111 0.258 CID 3 3 12333 0.47 6549 4580 51 4351 374 112 262 0.468 0.140 9.327 CID 4 3 0 0.47 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 MD 5 3 21210 0.47 11262 7876 51 7402 643 193 430 0.460 0.138 0.322 E111 6 2 21668 0.29 15406 10774 51 10235 Boo 264 616 0.733 0.220 0.513 BRICKELL 1 5 3375 0.21 2663 1862 51 1769 152 46 106 0.000 0.000 0.000 MICKELL 2 5 1928 0.21 1522 1064 51 1011 87 26 61 0.000 0.000 0.000 NICKELL 3 5 21137 0.21 16678 11663 51 11060 953 286 667 0.725 0.217 0.507 NICKELL 4 5 34036 0.21 26854 18779 51 17040 1534 460 1074 0.754 0.226 0.528 PORT 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 3.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 moo 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 23992 14443 10100 9595 825 248 578 1 0 1 umm 66749 39344 27513 26138 2248 674 1573 2 1 1 NICKELL 60471 47717 33368 31700 2726 BIB 1108 1 0 1 WERTMIN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PORT 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 STUfT AREA 151214 101505 70M 17433 57" 1740 4059 ARM t135..NI35 AUTOTRIPS A133.11191 DATA Al..AF" ., 4ho-a Pbm I ftews" 1 4—: tm: $: ma wt Tau w"Will Im a wm C11111 11rd to Ud bortiff kictell I IM-11 I I 1 3 .. . . ........................ 1 6* IVUL --1 rfr•illlt .... .... . .......... . ....... . . ..... 1. Ft. 111 Floor 1 Flier ft"I liftal limelloot kaw boom I*. I INN Idd I VIM CBMU I VnowEwdwA kUM I Flow leftdr. *W@%Iq9 W.tv *Irffttll net Impliem; Told Cowart. Well I free talervall kob 114pi"wK free: -- ------------- ------- Ar" [we"N"Ismat: FAIIS 6" teew F. — ------ pR40 Or" gatepmotl Im ftell4speot: remb — — ------------ — -- — -- ommol: 4rem *"-"** — — — — amm us ---------- fait. . ........ *•------ — . ..... ) 14.1t. Jok lk,fi. h% A. f4%A. Ak hk Wo LASW L P". Now ask 14m. jak S4.11. pabsts M1 14.1t. jok Me %..to ------ b" Wt. 400" 1.0.6 30" Joe Jobe --ow"Ga FKtar..) 4.44 4144 2.11 L" 6.443 6.631 1.127 1.0 IA . 1.9314 .. . ................ Lu .................. 1.42 1.42 ......... .. ... ....... 4.0 . . . .............. . ................ .. . ..... Pol.aw PW.fw ........ . . . . . . . . .. . . . ...... . ...... ............. pw.ng FW.Rw ...... ...... . . . metro Pwan Pw.no .... .......... . . . .................... Per. fill," . por. MIF Us. mr NW.RN Per. AV PW.ffw IAe. Ah"t . .. . ... . ................... . . ....................................... ............... . . .............................................. HIM 495 4 4 111W • 333 • 110 3" S27 Ila Was lit 1" Ttl zlim m xw • no 1164 I 620 1311 2414011111 1M 1111 Ms 26 I= w 1 0 w" 0 1 1476 IU 961 lvp Inm in 70? M 1311* Am • 0 31M 04 a I., 0 1917466 Ism 1 • 1 1 4 0 4 0 6 4 I"M 11 1 IMMO 3 sm; 132E • A 130M 1 41 0 4 • 0 0 0 0 0 1 9 11"3110 4 1561 Mt 41 Imm I= 0 210"• 61 1 In 2 227M wt 0 233M 1 tin 1 efTTM 1. S ww us I unis 111 3" Ills it, Ix tam 0 121 319 2 SPIN Im 6m : • .S : • 6 1 "M 0 M 1?" 14 ZIL I t 443" in 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 6 1 0 6 1 Us" UL 2 arum Is" I • D 0 MT 4 1714 12% IBM Sul I a I I 1 0 Imm • m: Im s1n 10 , U I izue low, lvw • 10 MIM .me '"Lil wau 4 no 367110, 4%W Till 2139 to 111011 m 1 0 um 1 233 0 lit In w? ton 0 6 4 no ?m Till n3 AIR xam 12m "VWC ON Ism 2311M 45 Hill 324 lu 111 4110 174 M" Ism 1414 • d xmm 72M 13410 at • 2n4 11" 1*& 30 6 1 0 1 4 21911140 • Me In" W" m AM 436101 Im low 20 "0 not "If, 10, "1 100 In # 1214M 10 1974 UP 33P 3" ~ am sum pw mm' Ism 6mm Mw m sin w am $12 aud m m &am an 1 6 G 4 6 a 0 4 If1121a 30 fro 3mi 411411 Sm WINC *.g r fR ICI iii .I F, qq S' _I `4? •jy T ?-'..A # 24•steep-16 OttSOtS! D01lMTDIRI NIMI IRI PERDOII TRIPS CXClUTIm NDM ATTR (KI DEVELOPMENT ItEL(111111 PREVIOUS INCREMENTS) (shol ScNariut 1 <------1 1"2 • 1 Caiit"t AapeoreE(II 1 1997 • 2 sssssalNaf Alleteahte( 1 1 200S • 3 f1.ua7at s 1 NOSE -BASED PR( (1CTUNES------------------------------I WME-BASED ATTRACT101ts;------»---------------------t k 1ASED----•---------------i TOTAL Parcel Area 1 •,Irxk Shop Soc.Rec. School --- Misc. ---------- Total 1 ------ Mork Shop Soc.Rec. School Misc. Total t „d-HOME Parson Taxi Tack Total E Oul 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 --- 0 -------- -- 0 ------ G ------------ 0 ----- 0 ---------- 0 -------------------- Q 0 ------------------------------ 0 0 0 0 OMMI 2 ( 0 0 0 0 a 0 572 0 173 0 476 1421 231 14 90 324 1747 owl 3 1 ". 199 521 398 225 462 2405 270 319 214 0 313 1121 182 7 32 271 3797 OTPM 1 4 2467 1608 1227 693 1427 7422 1191 74 773 0 1414 3439 563 29 305 397 11776 OTPI 2 4 1457 949 724 4" 842 4382 158 1" 302 0 1014 2572 411 21 201 441 7595 GPM 3 4 0 0 470 0 311 788 1627 Ill 793 0 2138 4490 798 43 237 1117 4795 C11 1 2 0 0 0 v 0 0 10206 0 0 0 2316 13021 4117 749 1434 UO2 16824 CID 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 IBO6 56 547 0 2133 4141 739 44 234 1137 3376 q@ 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1600 62 485 0 1890 4057 660 39 223 '124 4981 CID 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2528 1608 766 0 2996 7369 1734 Q 153 1101 4580 CID 5 3 .'320 201 159 10 183 962 8263 436 2556 0 9739 21014 4420 202 1171 1800 26776 Cu 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2070 22 627 0 2445 3163 344 31 211 1142 4347 NICKELL 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 315 0 95 0 372 732 127 3 44 179 961 WICKELL 2 5 2738 17B4 1362 769 150 6235 9568 556 3333 0 11300 24776 1032 134 1194 3742 39773 NICKELL 3 MICKELL 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 14703 472 4454 0 17365 34994 5020 339 2046 1445 43440 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 2474 136 749 0 2122 4282 1072 60 348 1430 7712 PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0lMII 799 521 398 225 462 2405 842 319 388 0 994 23442 414 21 143 597 5544 D8MNT141( 320 209 159 90 185 962 26471 2203 4991 0 22029 3364 1042 446 3732 13446 70093 IRICKELL 2138 1184 t362 719 1583 8233 27060 t165 1651 0 31918 68334 11701 440 3733 13114 921" OVERTODUPM 3924 2557 2422 1103 2597 12392 3863 384 2068 0 4326 10120 1177 113 7S3 2433 26167 PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 mom AREA 7780 $070 4340 21M 4817 24194 51250 4070 16087 0 PUT 137982 !M4 1442 4613 32514 194690 �R i �'h ,III �� 'fMi ��� •' � _ � 4t � � � (�� `.'� � 24-a -136 ' XIT MOE 1OWW TABLE 01130:53 Area saw Noll Doi CID West CID East Overt/PW Irictell 041AITQYN N1ANI M1 Area 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 AUT1 TRIPS CALCUT10N 1992 no 0.00 0.39B 0.289 0.449 0.080 0.211 ('ZV SEVELO WIT INCIAINI FMI0114 INCRElENT1997 RS 0.00 4.442 0.241 0.400 0.067 0. 1" reart 1 <------I 1"2 • 1 2005 115 0.00 0.472 0.213 0.360 0.039 0.1% IMrOM11) 1 M = 2 Movable( I t 2DOS = 3 1 DAILY TRIPS ---- -»_ »_-------1 PEAK HOUR AUTO TRIPS----------_ CHECX------ ---------- --- _ »�.__----------»»_»----_____ Persoa tbde Aato Auto __-•_---------•--»»_� IRtraz./ External Tro-Wav -------------- Inbound Outbound ----------- Net Trip ------------ Rate - - Parcel Area Trips Wit P.Trios Trios Int.1 --•------ Auto T. --------- (Auto Trios per 1000 SF) Coarersion Factor > 1.43 OI ------ ------ 0.066 ------ 0.30 ------• 0.70 --------------- Two-Vay -------- ---- Inbound Outbound (Transit) Per./AutoOverall I PH/Daily lobed I Ootbnd I OtW11 I 1 0 0.40 0 0 51 --------------------•------------ 0 0 0 0 --------------- 0.000 -------- 0.000 ---- 0.000 OMNI 2 I 1747 0.40 lost 735 51 699 60 is 42 0.539 0.162 0.177 TMNII 3 1 3717 0.40 2286 1599 31 1519 131 39 91 1.519 0.456 1.063 OTPW 1 4 11778 0. OR +natc Ts» 7A! AW 521 156 365 2.161 0.649 1.514 OTPN 2 4 7595 0.08 6987 40M 201 3909 336 101 235 0.703 0.211 0.492 OTPN 3 4 6795 0.08 6251 4372 201 3497 301 40 211 0.607 0.192 0.423 Cu 1 2 16924 0.29 11962 6365 51 7947 03 205 478 0.344 0.103 0.241 CBD 2 3 5572 0.47 2962 2071 51 1968 169 St Its 0.473 0.142 ;.331 CID 3 3 4981 0.47 2645 1849 51 1757 151 45 106 0.472 0.142 0,330 CID 4 3 95I8 0.47 5071 3560 51 3382 211 67 204 0.629 0.189 0.440 CID 5 3 26776 0.47 142tB 9943 51 9441 112 244 369 0.491 0.147 0.344 CIS 6 2 6147 0.29 4512 3154 51 299s 258 77 ISO 0,636 0.191 0.443 NICKELL t 5 96l 0.21 759 530 51 504 43 13 30 0.707 0,212 0.495 IRICKELL 2 5 36773 0.21 30592 21393 51 20323 1748 524 1223 0.910 0.273 0.637 NICKELL 3 5 45440 0.21 35832 25071 51 23818 204E 614 1434 0.703 0.211 0.492 NICKELL 4 5 7712 0.21 6005 4255 51 4042 348 104 243 0.701 0.210 0.491 PORT 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 IIIIMI 5544 3337 2334 2217 - t91 -31»--- t33 ------- 2 ---- ---- 11 --- IIISITOYN 70093 413" 28944 27497 2365 709 1633 3 1 2 NICKELL "asb 73207 51250 48687 4167 1256 2931 3 1 2 +� DVFRTnWVIPW 26161 24074 14833 1346E 1158 347 oil 3 1 2 PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .._..--_-.---- ---- --------------- ------ -------- STUDY AREA it4690 142018 99362 91069 7901 2370 5531 AREAS 1135..N135 AUTOTRM A133..0198 PORT 160 1140 DATA A1..AF66 rig Af - _tit" (AN PORT 1620 501 v I W6 lr Y)r�, . V" .-Chn mmmm=:L 1119*411111M 00 MNLWM =Me& fllllt MMXNM kestrioi P t-1 rm 1 11111111 Opp so I I I MY • 2 "d m ad = Ud bertnv &IC*dl I 191"10111 : =•I I a 1 1 4 11 I WL WFICF—: ON. CIT11131-1 SOM I In"m— I tonals—I Comengm-1 Ilmm9nmiLAMMINFU ;,rm &m: new, wice: nw w , : newt now well a", mmiiss %now boftm I*. I bw bid I new, c— a I now twdwA stood I nor kamft. admdei L,ts Mnr#%W:t now MrAd whal 144d C C. Istoll ArnEmplepost! Ar": bill MaLsberf. I [Wripmet: OruW@Mdl Am kellsiollIpIeWl AmIliplepin"aWl Weled:9 6191 bm bito, 041OW141"MetWepel 1111st. Jok 24.Ft. kh 94-ft. 1{-Ft. Jdk J*s IIA him Ldw F. I*. flees Jak Ill.n. kh Wl. Itailmosts Me Wt. Joh hu S­ts i0s Wt. Iman 1.0.4 his kh me wo fwtsr--) 4.44 4.44 2.71 3.06 41.443 6.431 I.SV 1.0 1.4411 6.1374 1.11 1.42 1.0 1. 04 PK.AW FWAN Per. My for. AN Awtm1w Pw.M rw.M tw.Akm PW.MW Its. MY Ow. AN PW.PM IM." FW.Mod I 1 0 ll , e 1 1 142 111 0 .............. 4 1911 t4i • t • . 31 I' In M 11. 14 us 30 4 7jo I= mi IN I 111 46162 is 6" am I U3 I so ?a 26 "1 3" 31141 2"M Vol W 3"1 JVI 163 4 2 ISOM Ila lzm e " 0 e e $ 1 140 147 Ile 3 um 240 um M 2" mlI 1, M 3� 1 m I U111 1113 136 I 27 21{P Mm,# "$I Me "0, Sue 101 " TM 11111, 3 4 1 1 4 0 1 17"W rA 4 1 Mae 0 IQ 1 0 8 0 4 430 4% rAON M 1 6 1 1 0 ?few 434 11 "91 M 141 I INM 4440 "Ml 1 111111 1 0 4 1 It 341 .11 S"M rm W"' "Soo, all 344 1 1 0 a 7"n"b I'm su 116 3" M a 1 4 &AS I II 5 Inl� U6 664 In In 11 13M 1 Ts %ft T!" 11� ?I: it 4 s 2fseeN llm e I lum 1 11611 1 Oil 4" Soo 1141 11's 173 0 6 )MM 173 1" vul? 41639 Me . .................... . ........ IINM no 11"m 6" low • vI 1 M In 21 IOU 380 30 23M rA I l� lieIle • 9 1p*M 3" us 14111,111 fm III ISOM I"to "no• Pill IV 1III Im IV &V mas 2% 1 " 4I No 16 36 5.11: IN imme 49 1111111 71W "M Zito 1 12" 1 no Im Im "a III is" zing In# — — ----------- -­----------- ---- ------------------ ----------- -------- ----- ON tow oil 143= a 3q1 0 im mw pit a" 1316 130 lIIeN 30 JINN It in toum 146 146 3,4 10 141sm 130 610 miss 34M VIIIII die ¢i �IN1 III�II I,:,II IIIl III I ``I ��,I �i dfi�'� ��� •��4.�,'�y"i`� . I I I I I I li'i ��I�� g- :1•Stp� 08:42:27 DOIXTD p1 M10I WI - PERSOM TRIPS CA1.12UTION MIN ATTR (10 DEVELOPMENT MAIN PREVIOUS INCREWMI (shoo) Scsssrio: 2 C------1 1992 = 1 Coast"t Appravedt 1 I997 = 2 1HH*�•+N Allorable(r) 1 2005 s 3 i1.368201 e _----___ ..��� 1 HOIIE-IKSED PRDWXTitOR SS _•___���________----------------------��___----_-------- ---_���____��w 1 ROME-iai ATTBACTIOMS---------------------------»-: --------- -------------._��..._ MOM -HOME RASED---_-_._���__»-1 TOTAL 7-ce1 Area 1 pork Shop Soc.Rec. School Mist. Total ; Vork Shop Soc.Rec. School Misc. Total : Person Taxi Track Total 1 tI t 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 32B 0 50 0 239 617N~__i�o -_____�_,_____� _____ 135 _ 772 1 2 1 296 193 147 83 171 891 5066 l49 1385 0 5389 11788 1ill* 1 124 779 7803 13682 J 3 1 4•.13 322 716 139 603 2272 6929 222 2187 0 7486 16923 27113 189 1001 3928 23024 :111 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1112 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 fN3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 463 1207 0 4708 1030 1.1V 97 560 2344 12710 0 2 3 0 0 188 0 127 315 3825 185 1081 10 4000 9103 14A 102 S38 2120 11338 3 3 395 257 196 ill 228 1180 1724 927 1193 0 4398 10242 11.::1 91 343 2303 13132 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 3 0 0 423 0 286 709 10401 1020 3366 0 12794 27071 41", 272 1142 6139 33970 6 2 M 2 900 687 388 799 4156 5762 742 1975 0 6805 15284 24,.7 141 396 3514 22954 XKELL 1 5 1520 990 156 427 679 4572 2724 185 1078 0 3217 7205 1112 54 447 1706 13483 1CKEtl 2 5 512 386 294 166 342 1781 0 0 98 0 0 99 16 0 33 49 1928 1CmL 3 5 493 322 410 139 396 1760 6425 993 2112 0 7189 17107 21�_.4 164 930 3879 22746 iCKELL 4 5 849 553 587 238 602 2829 15774 501 3003 0 18630 39907 6414 392 7264 7130 31087 T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O -91 7&9 514 863 222 774 3163 12323 371 3621 0 131il 27427 4i;:? -- 371 ------------------------- 1776 6086 39476 WONR 1776 1158 1475 4" 1440 6368 27699 3337 6823 10 32195 72063 117i7 703 1"1 16421 9403 •1CKELL .3454 2251 2047 971 MO 10942 24924 1669 6291 0 29435 64319 10k-s 623 3494 14793 90043 `RTDIM/PN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4f AREA 6020 3923 4404 1692 4434 20473 64945 5374 20735 10 74744 165812 26r:,3 1644 9441 - 380" 224374 r oa 2 )0 ::., MGM Parcel NO. /,Pl., LOW TALE Area name Null Omni CIO Iest CID East Overt/PI Brickell C. NOW NIAMI DRI Area f 0 t 2 3 4 S MO TRIPS CALCULATION 1792 MS 0.00 0.398 0.209 0.469 0.000 0.211 OtEN DEkELOMT INCLUDING PREVIOUS IINUEIEN11997 NS 0.00 0.442 0.241 0.400 0.067 0.189 rent 2 (------i i992 = 1 2005 NS 0.00 0.472 0.215 0.360 0.059 0.174 Awaved( 1 1 t997 = 2 Allerabte(z1 ; 2005 = 3 ' 6AILr TRIPS PEAK HOUR AUTO TRIPS---------_-_ CiECK------_--»---- �» Persoa » We Auto »»Auto Inbound Oatbound Writ./ External Tvo-May Net Trip Rate �» Area Trips Split P.Trips Trips Int.1 Auto T. (Auto Trips per 1000 SF) --------- Conversion factor-----) 1.43 01 0.086 0.30 0.70 (Transit) Per./AutoOrerall i PH/Daily Inbad I Outbnd 1 OIOII 1 1 772 0.44 431 301 51 286 25 '- ----- 7`17 OMNI 2 1 15682 0.44 8750 6119 51 5813 500 150 330 OMNI 3 1 21024 0.44 12847 0984 51 8535 734 220 514 OTPN t 4 0 0.07 0 0 201 0 0 0 0 OTPI 2 4 0 0.07 0 0 201 0 0 0 0 OTPI 3 4 0 0.07 0 0 201 0 0 0 0 CID 1 2 12710 0.24 9647 6746 51 6409 531 163 386 CID 2 3 11538 0.40 6923 4841 51 4599 396 119 277 CID 3 3 13732 0.40 8239 5762 51 5474 471 141 330 CID 4 3 0 0.40 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 CID 5 3 33920 0.40 20352 14232 51 13520 1143 349 814 CID 6 2 22954 0.24 17422 12163 51 11574 995 2" 497 BRICKELL 1 5 13463 0.19 ION 7646 51 7264 625 127 437 BRICKELL 2 5 1728 0.19 1564 1094 51 1039 69 27 63 IRICKELL 3 5 22746 0.19 18447 12900 51 12255 1054 316 738 BRICKELL 4 5 51067 0.19 42080 29427 51 27953 2404 721 1683 PORT 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 OMI 39471 22028 15105 14634 1259 378 881 "'lITO1N1 94853 62582 43764 41576 3576 1073 2503 MICKLLL 90043 73025 51067 40513 4172 1252 2920 PERMIN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( STUPT AREA 224374 137631 110233 104723 9006 2702 6304 Gb AREAS IM.11135 AUTOTRIPE P't3,.t1191 DATA A,..4f66 FILL A1..AFI" Tro-Yay Inbound 0.-bowW --------------- 0.123 0.037 0.086 0.287 0.486 0.201 0.583 0.173 0.408 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.660 0.200 0.448 0.416 0.125 0.291 0.588 0.177 0.412 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.573 0.137 0.366 0.927 0.249 0.581 1.134 0.341 0.795 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.801 0.240 0,361 0.779 0.234 0.546 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.040 0.000 0.400 3 1 2 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 to� p � i�l' .,' � �ffi � I I .I r ;� li'i�..�,��!'ll.;.l��.'1�1!.. tt�a.;r''�GY. I••N�I� � �IL�ta1!II i;4•a .,Slip. � �i,,�l,l �• I�� �II���,I I ' li I � �� `Il���i���l I�I�Vi��l�ll� � II III i� �, � ITV ..i � I «�I � 5 sA<�, _ �� Y � I II I`i I�IIV�oI�I� hldl�iWl��� ull� �I .1► � IIt31 fm.3 as R1R31+V1 Una a wr. 3 Scl.aclel 1 t--^-1 till • 1 t 1 1" to VAL& 1 H Wessf ll 1 vlt • 1 1 1 Itr W IIr EN GII Mt711 IrIcI111 1 tl1•w11e1 ! 1 7..: • 3 t I 1 ! 1 • S i .».... ............... .......»».__._.. ........__ a10 N1IlE I ..r. �iFltl-•^-I IiIIL-_ _...._— —.... 1 r3110ri1- ^ _»___.._....^.I Ili -- 1 E�l[iAlf--• -I inrl »»»»__ .—._ 1 II�1IIlJM3313 alt•Att—Ii F.N. lbt•wrtl All—.»— __._»_._» now ttrN Irlltt$ _._ .__»......... IrN EwMt. INwf ht.l frN I Flux 1911t0 I floor (i.1<Mt 1 Fiwr 1 ila.► Mtll fettll 11•elllq VI► 1...•ul h1. 1 I•eu •l.l 1 Flee► (:rMte 1 Flrr Ereluel klr) 1 rlow 1.•.M.. •el«a1.� r« tgl•r•eltgt.q«I. 41wM n �+ f.••. 14t• Ertwretrll.•rtMlal.�• t Ir.a Eee1q•att •.a Ee01q•utl Aru I b« EW1•gwtEyl•lutl bits fatr LA•v r. I Eglpatl free Eg1.luU ft« tcallq.ttie• "all ........... I.I. AN« Low F. ea•. Mw Jr. Eq.rt. Jr. E•.Ft. !lr«te Jr. iq.Ft. AN Jr. toga Jrr. M.tq. 1«.. Owl sale is" we.-..--................... ...t.-....—•••---d Q.►t. Ar. ty tt. Ar. q.rl. 1q•rt. Jr. Are -- ------ -••--- ------------- -------- — — — ——_»»_». r.e<etM Facts, -•l 4.441 I.e/ _..— --- — 7.71 S.M »»»._. — — -------•-•• 6.43 •.17t I.171 ...................--._.... I. am I. ..tIN nti e.. I_ ns..F er.I•.M..N. h.lt1 h.[S ►w.7g h.cti Set tlh .! .-IF _.. __n1..r1.i7. .r.._.. ._.._._P.._.... .__..__.__...__....._...... _......_....._. _..._.... _. .—..............._........--_........_.--»-.........—........--.............--....•--......._r---------W...._..—....................... dl 1 I 0 / • • • • f • _» • • _—....... • • • • • .......•---...--_..._..._.r.......__....... • • • • • . a . q i a . A . Ilow / , A a n • IA • u 7 1 t{IIM Ir5 • • ! • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • A 1 • + q q n al• a33 133 7A 713 -tll i 0 • • • IIIM • ri3 • 371 $21 1.73 • • • • • 1 f • / a . 410" A .aIIM q Sao IaK IIa 11 ..am, =I f • 31M • it • a, a,, 3W 1174 73N 1117 • • • • • • • 1 • . a q 7at7M M• ".q 777• 1S1 !! 3 1 IT7S•0 lief • • pile • 7S1 • 7.11 131• IM IIa1 IM ••1 17l11• 71] • • • 1.1 Tat• 2317 75711 N; .• 3 1 n11M 1117 • 0 113M • lei • i3a Ilq UM 331I 30 30 31MM ltl • • 1 • q q q 1 141 I 3 • I ....AN 117c I I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • a q . 3771• n A 1711 Ino 11 .17 3 A7lM lul 1 • Ism • 11 I • • • • • • • • • I • • • • 1 ♦ q A 17.1 IJN Y 13 1 7RGM t331 ! 1 77.11 I Y • • • • • • • • • • • I ! ! 1 a Wm 1 A171N n a 11f1 11N » 1 3 1n)M 1.71 e e • 7311M • 1175 • • • • • I • • I • • • • • q ta31eM a 77a ilal 111a In IN .t 1 1 11171a 1131 0 0 HIM • 311 • 3N ISI Ill 13• • • • • • • • • • • • q e1Ea• A a 11N IigO 1• c 1 7 3t17M IPA • • YM • 11 • • • I • • • • • • • • • • i 1 . H-M a A 711 111 1 -• I=LL 1 1 413a ! • • • • • I • • • I • I • I • • • • • • a q lgtta« . 211A g717 •717 NI • .Qau 2 1 1n11M tie. • • u••a • NI • 7174 17" IIM 34t • • I • • • • • • • • q Ill as" . a 17711 17113 NI •• iQ3t1 3 1 77613•• In"0 • 177N• • 34 • • • • • • • • • • • I • • / • ♦ na1N q n 71N 71H w �:E7tdLL! S pe1M 3•a • • 361•! • M • • • • • • I • • • • q a A 1 A • • lE 0 • • I • • • • • • I • I ! e . q a n a 1 • to • • • • I I • • I I • • • q a q n a • • 7E o • • • • • • I • --- -- - --- ! _.�._.»•_ IIIIW I�S� • • 11•M —. � 733 �. I III 31 377 1•A ------------ • • • • • • ! ► • • • • • .M M • 111I7N • • 11• 171 17I a71N 771 ta•IS 713 ul• alAl now Imu tnra.t I NOW 711•M 131 Ian 371 131 Ill 111 I • • I I • • • • • • • • 1 33t1N• s rNil 77111 ISI .10311 "TM 77315 I I nuM / Ol • m1 17M IIN 11/1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1e711'N IIM M11Ills 11M 7.11 7111 N• .1rr711 F•'3.601 11a • • INIM • STI • ••1• 110 Sl7• IIN3 IIa 11M MI" AIS • • • • • • • • e • • • • 1 1 e 0 I 1 1 / 1 I • • • • • I • • • • .»_.. — ..........».—»__. »..»».._ . _._.........._.... c<ir a5110 NiN Ill, i+1 am 7fltw 2DMI 7•If IIA U'IN "a lot 11121 law It" bow 40 • • • • • • • • In117•• %IM INM San• N«A tq1• 2444t0-l6 08153136 106,.(m NMI MI TER a Rips CALCYLATIM (in GEYELOPI a INMOI Mi 1REY11Y1 IIK;AEIENTII knairies i (-1 1"2 • 1 Approveffli I I497 • 2 Allowable( ) 1 2005 • 3 W ATTR ("I Castawt aafteeaaaa{ If.36001 • r it hK I HONE-ial ATTRACTIORS------—_•..»._...•-.—.I NOF,-MK BASE!----------- I TOTAL �rcl1 Area ( 1'.> t Shop SK.Rec. Sckool Wisc. Total I York Shop Soc.Rec. Sckooi Miac. Total I Person Taxi -Truck Total I A I 1 0 0 0 0 0— 0 0 — 0 --4 -----0-------0 -----0-•-----0 ---_---0 ---- ---------------- 0 0 --- - 0 N1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 572 0 173 0 676 1421 231 14 30 326 1747 .91 3 1 749 521 3" 225 462 2405 270 319 214 0 319 1121 132 7 32 271 3797 A 1 4 3`,53 2315 1767 9" 2055 10698 2205 111 1238 0 2604 6177 G03 54 504 13" 18431 'N 2 4 2::2 1665 1988 604 2036 9553 2924 348 1649 0 3433 0373 1143 96 369 2021 19955 'P11 3 4 2467 1608 1697 613 1744 8210 2981 261 1552 0 3520 8314 1A3 93 333 2001 111525 ,) 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 102" 0 0 0 2916 13021 21,19 249 1434 :307 14824 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1806 56 $47 0 2133 4341 749 44 254 1037 3378 8 3 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 1600 82 465 0 1890 4057 !:0 39 223 724 4"1 q 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2528 1606 766 0 2986 7888 LA 62 333 1701 9518 S 3 320 201 IN 90 183 962 8263 436 2556 0 9739 21014 3420 201 1171 4900 26776 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2070 22 627 0 2445 5163 to 31 291 1132 4347 ACKELL 1 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 315 0 93 0 372 732 127 8 44 %1 ,SCKELL 2 S 2738 1784 1362 769 1583 9233 9561 554 3333 0 11300 24776 402 234 1414 .179 3742 38773 �iCKELL 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 14703 472 4454 0 17363 36994 61.11.0 339 2044 $443 43440 '1CKELL 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 2474 136 749 0 2922 6292 ICA 60 340 1430 7712 tT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --- -_-_- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 7;7 521 398 225 462 2403 ---- 942 319 --------- 388 -------------------------- 0 "4 2342 -----------------_—__----___---- 0 21 143 397 SSN KIM . 0 208 151 40 163 962 26473 2203 4"1 0 22023 35683 9.:12 644 3734 13444 70093 CKELL 27:8 1784 I362 769 1513 8235 27040 1165 8631 0 3IM 68934 111A 460 3933 IM14 92816 RTONUMI Al"O 5788 $452 2491 5633 28452 1109 720 4459 0 9577 22344 3,d 243 1431 3393 U911 T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "K AREA 12731 001 7370 3380 1065 40054 62484 4401 11471 0 645M 149M 2U,1 1370 1487 35454 225433 '�► MODE SPLIT LOOKUP TIME OItS3t40 keg ague Neil Omi E D Nest CID East Overt/PV kictell Dom..; A NIMI MI Area 1 0 1 2 3 4 S - AU1G ;.IIPB CALCLLATIM 1992 NS 0.00 0.3% 0.289 0.449 0.080 0.211 M& ._VEtp'fIENI MAIN PNEVIOUB INCNENENT1497 NS 0.00 0.442 0.241 0.400 0.047 0.119 Veart 1 < 1 19l2 a 1 2005 NS 0.00 0.472 0.215 0.340 0.059 0.176 Appre Wal 1 1997 • 2 Allocable( 1 1 2005 • 3 1 1i;,:ty TRIPS ---I PEAK IMUR AUTO TRIPS------ CHECK ---- PC;. ,n Node Aeto Auto Intro./ External Two-Vav Inbound Oetbmd Net Trip Rate »- ;)rcel keg T.:j Split P.Trips Trips Int.1 Auto T. (Auto Trips per 1000 5F) "orsion factor-----? 1.43 01 --------------»»»»---- 0.086 0.30 0.70 -------- ----------------.» Two-Vay Inbound Outbound (Transit) Per./AutcOverall 1 PH/Daily labnd 1 Oetbnd 1 0 0.40 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0. O At 2 1 1:=1 0.40 1051 735 51 698 60 11 42 0.539 0.142 0.111 ,it 3 1 : ;7 0.40 2286 159E 51 1519 131 39 91 1.519 0.454 1.063 N 1 4 1_ 1 0.02 1056 11657 201 94M Ili 245 571 1.830 0.555 1.213 YN 2 4 1....5 0.06 16339 12838 201 10271 B13 20 fill 1.140 0.348 0.e12 A 3 4 1. 5 0.06 17043 1191B 201 9335 820 246 574 1.115 0.334 0.1410 -0 1 2 1. .4 0.29 11962 9365 51 7947 683 205 478 0.344 0.103 0.211 7 2 3 '3 0.47 29fi2 2071 51 1966 169 51 111 0.473 0.142 0.131 D 3 3 1 0.47 2645 1849 51 1757 151 45 104 0.472 0.142 0.1;0 D 4 3 3 0.47 5041 3560 51 U82 291 87 204 0.429 0.169 0.440 'D 5 3 2 6 0.47 14211 4943 51 9446 612 244 569 0.491 0.147 0.344 `D 6 2 1 0.29 4512 3156 51 2998 23B 77 100 0.636 0.191 0.413 ICKELI 1 5 1 0.21 751 530 51 504 43 13 30 0.707 0.212 0.4r5 :CKELL 2 5 3L';i 0.21 $0592 21393 51 20323 1748 324 1223 0.910 0.273 0.617 imu 3 5 4-A 0.21 35052 25071 51 23816 2048 614 1434 0.703 0.211 0.02 , II 4 5 'ijA 0.21 6065 4255 51 4042 348 104 243 0.701 0.210 0.4i1 A 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0..4 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.0•40 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0. WO 4 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.5•10 '�I 5.i4 3337 23H 2217 191 57 133 2 1 1 ;21IM 70:11 41310 28944 27497 M 709 1455 3 1 2 TKELI 92,:. 71287 51250 48617 4167 1254 2931 3 1 2 :RTOM1/PN 56 M 52359 36i14 29291 2519 756 1743 4 1 3 T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .Dy AREA 225413 170372w119141w 107692 9242�--2771 6413 ~ 1138..11135 16TRIPS AI33..O19N PONT 860 1I40 :A A1..AW Ill', .II�F�'9Ai� 61'I' h"�� •�, �.i.,h lit low4gow &M as swift on 11111 am &M CM ad M Ud *sort#" trictoll I 3 4 3 a ON. Wt k%M lmbdf- 1110100019; Wa at"s Ntf#%V: :nw voto moviisso add mitn' WIL OFFIM 110,16 raw ratio newt ..t not, i law basal basil twollaq mooloor Antow r". I I IBM japasa 1 now Console I Flee tordevot Iru kOlopit0l"Wt' (spi",spin ora koft sitio Aroat"lorw: omits Ast"UNerp. jol"vd: ... ..... Jobs LL Astes LOW F. IV. bon J" Jr!%.n.lPtudoods is" 3*6 Sea& a" , — ---------- bers ----- JAM . ...... 3" Jobs 14.rt. J*s SaSt. 14-11. 114A. jos — --- — 4.44 I-------- '44 — - 2.11 Lam 6.413 SA31 LIV Pvc.1141 Por.110 P".IAM Sts.mv rW.AW IN J PW.Rs Per." iliptograim ....................... . ..... ............................................... 34 2011 0 0 0 0 41 a a 1 0 444M 1 liam M4 IM 1*04 1111 4 mom • 1 M a TOO T"q 44" 201 1 TAN 6 243 0 30 141 M IN I I 1 4 11117 Al 1 its" am • I I "its no now I"M in • 9141 419 S" 3" 41 6 1 0 10 14 10 6 10 • 4 2 slow 11214, 11111 2m 0 6"M 22 vim I"M it 7410 we 113 AFN 70" we 136 4111 a 3m lu 424 in M 39 0 0 Z4- too I MISS no 456 I 111117 4 0 6 1 4" 438 um lamm 10 if" IM am 4710 rA I M a" 1117 2311 so 30 I 0• mm I "in Ma = 134 2 UNM 7114 6 3" 136 1 Do IM Isn 3145 0• 0 6 1 "IM 4 n% 136 im Ili 1 111111 M WA M I om zM M • 30 in 326 0 in 16W 16W 356 5 in" Not 13,611 M lots 2078 1?$ 173 0 4 I low IS3111 I # •41 G 1 0 4 2im 2% 1 0 0 NNW 1420 1474 .... 0 $"am . ........ 5111 1 M 111" me 17M TIM 13144 U1111 541 711 IM 30 Im 1= 0 30 0 130 me 5311 tilt Mu 1742 17141 17% 300 so n Its own 71 71 to" we E3� 0 4"M MIS MM lam mew 2M 0 113M 1 • imam 60 336 1 1 I I a I I 1 6 0 2M 4 0 0 • ............ IN" M I"IM am 14M 1111111 1 stts 1 "a 41" un lam 20 360 "M in n "ll allow I"I I"t imam am am I"m 24-Sq-�L W. i rim 11011 KI PER::.:; TRIPS CKWTI0R MOM 08 6EVEI.0PMERT INMUDIN9 PREVIOOS It or III 1"I Scmariot 3 <------; 1992 s 1 Coostalt Approved! 1 ; 1997 s 2 iHUHHU AllowloletTt ; 2005 - 3 i1.36B201 i ------------ ; K:: --------------- -BASED PR0DL1CTIMG-------««««« --`--------- -t HOME -USED ATTRRCT[�tS------------ ;NON-INN1E LASED-----`r-; TOTAL Total 1 •rcel Area ; ,.rk Shop Soc.Rec. School Misc. Total 1 Work Shop Soc.Rec. -------- — School -------------------------- Misc. Total ; Person —---------- Taxi Truck » 0 0 ------ 657 0 99 0 479 1233 201 16 92 309 1344 ait t 1 0 0 0 t93 147 ' 0 63 171 89t 8801 278 2317 0 9205 20600 3352 213 1253 4820 26311 At 2 1 296 S74 412 250 831 3460 10470 463 3325 0 1166d 25927 4219 276 1521 6016 35402 4[ 3 r:Mt 1 4 c.aB Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rY3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7697 463 2331 0 9010 19581 1136 138 1002 4456 24031 1 2 3 Q 0 0 4?1 270 394 tab 367 1562 4438 In 1163 21 4206 10014 t630 116 647 2393 13968 2 3 :..2 386 859 166 723 2726 4418 927 1724 0 5210 12250 1i99 t30 654 2790 11790 3 :4 3 D 0 0 0 0 0 286 0 709 0 0 11311 1761 0 3644 0 0 0 13366 4 30080 0 4N96 0 271 0 1591 0 3781 6 A578 5 9 6 3 2 Q 0 423 FOOL 1158 1354 499 1345 6132 9578 927 3436 0 11312 25253 4139 254 1444 111 5808 1771 37192 16054 iCKELL 1 5 . 9 1505 1149 649 1335 6947 2724 185 t209 0 0 3217 32t7 7334 7051 1171 tt47 66 66 lib 1630 10462 :CKELL 2 5 1 386 294 166 342 396 1781 1760 2724 In 8060 1094 924 2607 0 9519 21279 3i53 204 1160 4827 27B65 XKLU 3 5 S'S 322 410 930 139 431 1001 4907 18561 760 5962 0 21921 47204 7.A,82 460 2614 10936 62147 iCKELL 4 5 i_io 1003 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :ci 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 o 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 1::4 772 1051 333«« 1002 »43M 19928 ___--742 5742 0 21331 47762 7777 107 983 2966 3417 11145 22223 63238 130574 r.I r 1814 3030 2..3 tB14 3030 182 2721 11129 3744E 4264 12297 21 43192 37875 97222 92970 11521 130 797 4730 19063 117319 to= CKELL' �,.4 1382 2721 15345 32064 2225 10701 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOMIPU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0«»»«0 T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 »�0 »__««0- 8; 2 5801 6872 2501 6799 30874 P445 7230 22740 21 102418 227854 37079 22M 13064 52431 3111 ,gr p 2, NOLLOOKUP TABLE 08:49:Ot Area met Mull Oant COD Vest CID East OvertiPV 6ictell IIOIVOIN NIANI Ott Area I 0 1 2 3 4 5 AUTO TRIPS CALCULATION t992 N5 0.00 0.379 0.289 0.469 0.080 0.211 ' OMEN DEVElOP11 Y INCLUDING PREVIOUS INCIFIEK11997 NS 0.00 0.442 0.241 0.400 0.067 0. IN Yeart 3 <------I 1992 = 1 2005 NS 0.00 0.472 0.215 0.360 0.059 0.176 Approvad,4, I I99T = 2 Attouabie( 1 2005 = 3 ¢� Allt TRIPS._.__----------- -------------; PEAK OR AUTO TRIPS- .«_«_ - CHECX-------- ------- Person Node Auto -Auto Iatraa.1 External »Tro-Vay Inbound Outbound Net Trip Rate- ----� Parcel Area Trips Split P.Trips trips Int.1 Auto I. (Auto Trips per 1000 SF) Conversion Factor----t, «- ---� - 1.43 QI 0.004 0.34 0.70 Two-Vay Inbound O_.§md yr (Transit) Per.lAutoOverall I PH/Daily labnd I Datbad I WNI 1 t 1544 0.47 916 570 51 542 47 14 33 0.114 0.035 0.002 2 1 1,24311 0.47 13"5 V717 51 1231 794 238 554 0.262 0.079 0.184 �.ORKI OMNI 3 I .`�5402 0.47 16616 13074 52 12420 1069 320 749 0.541 0.I62 0.379 OTPV 1 4 0 0.06 0 0 201 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 OTPN 2 1 0 0.06 0 0 201 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 DIM3 4 0 0.06 0 0 201 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 3.000 CID 1 2 24031 MI 18681 13204 51 12544 1079 324 755 0.707 0.212 0.495 CID 2 3 0.36 2941 6253 52 5940 311 153 338 0.393 0,113 0.275 CID 3 411396G 3 , L7797 0.36 ll392 7966 51 7568 651 195 456 0.814 0.244 0.569 4 3 0 0.36 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 ,C11D CID 5 3 4,7578 0.36 24054 16821 52 15990 1374 412 962 0.514 0.134 0.360 CID 6 2 37112 0.21 29215 20430 51 19406 1649 Sol Me 0.902 0.271 0.632 IRICKELL 1 17 5 . 0.18 13225 9248 51 8786 756 227 529 1.374 0.412 0.942 IRICKELL 2 j.16054 5 ' ,'10462 0.16 9616 6027 52 5725 492 148 345 0.895 0.749 0.427 IRICKELL 3 5 ; 27665 0.16 22956 16053 51 15250 1312 393 91s 0.717 0.231 0.20 IRICKELL 4 5 0.10 SIM 36263 51 34450 2763 889 2074 0.811 0.243 0.367 PORT �',42947 O o 0.00 0 0 5I 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 Moo 0.000 0.004 o o 0.00 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 DNNI «»- G32S8 »»«_---33406 23UI 22113 1909 573 13U 1 0 1 LOIN MN 00574 92413 44474 61440 5284 15I5 3699 3 1 2 DRICKELL 11732I 960 67591 64211 5522 1657 3868 4 1 3 NERtOI IN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ETUOy AREA 111160 222545 155626 147044-»12715 3814 I900 Lo 1 1135-1113s AUTOTRIPS A133..019.. DATA A1..AF66 Fla AI..AFt91 C A on" pkpw / AN Mom-. w:'A M. M-•- -,.../ ..i 1.� MAP J-3A PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION. • (OMNi) DOWNTOWN A ` ERPLAN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT %+d ..r... �.__.. .....wi k.,.af ..• f ..., 4 . .....►w �• ii.... w .. -. • .i __...7 :.. .. r ��., ti MAP J-3A PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC DISTRiaUTION. • (COD) DOWNTOWN r _ A T R PLAN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT . •ti.r...+ .r' ...�... ww A....rr:..r•c ..�.•..Yff- �....�..�r.�.- ..—.«+ r•.' �1-ar-..�.•s...r..w�C,..nw..I.ra p4 MAP J-3A PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC DISTA BUTTON. (BRICKELL) �.� DOi�rriTOl�l' A i PLAN. �� DEVEI"WENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT GA/ M.r~ A W f++. 'zw� ra ..� w� Md V OIL Y'C. .n..w-+•.. W A04 JAAP J-3A PERMITTED CEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION. • ME O/PW) _ C.DOVVI ` `OW A T PLAN _ = 1DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT J C1 '1tL�(iR�y�-K.�rs. .,,�,rc. ;s;,�+•-w ''•.y{c; .�.ra4..�i. '».R.'��'a11."i�(-:J.w'�.� Fai......�Yirr.�:Y'�a: Y.•:...�pA �.. Y�' MAP J-3A PERMITTED! DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION. CP®�T' Dow TOW • `1iER PLAN DEVELOPMENT OF 115GI ONAL I M PACT 8E"845' I No *we& OIL eww.Lvd W*Omw Ompoww" bL MAP J-313 PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT LOCATIONS. (CB6) ASTER PLAN DOWNTOWNV" MEIVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Rm owl ftmew Adw " I" VW& ar. vmww4basd air ""m Mr MA+wa" 60-0" o•�wrra w j MAP J-38 PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT LOCATIONS. ME ®/P'W)..1 F` DOWNTOWN MASTERPLAN ..� C-" jj�l I�il�flell�,lll�llll�lilll 6iIIlIJ�I IIIII�IiIIVdI IBIdllu� it III III III `���IIII�I� Ii i dll�il lldiliili�d��� � � I . .. II NW 2 AVE/NW 6 ST EXISTING PM PEAK ow G I ME n!.L.] (0) w u J 20 w 200 ISO loc W' 0 415 4s rC 4v '4a tkw gals as so solo GOOD 001. TIME LEGEND I l NO TWU WO THM TOTAL LEGEND 118 THRU —_-- SO THRU TOTAL jlli�,�llel�lllll�ll�lldrllll IIIIII�I �II�IIIIII�� I� II�IIIIIII�� I{III III Ali Ili I II Vi�ll61III�i�il�lr�l�l i �i . � I I I I ��I h �I�Idllliill�I��Vi6Vi������� ��V��� _.._ BISCAYNE BLVD/NE 15 ST EXISTING PM PEAK volo ow 7W f ow i W wo ' J ' U i 400 W ow 2W i 1w i cxi O TIME Lil _ Y { I I'. I IIII I I I II i I I � i � ,.,:�a ��.i�► f er.� � '�'� .5+., ,ae '' �� ��1 IIII I� `� I„I�IIIIR�I�dllill II � I II �II ICI II r�I I�� i l l II I I � III I I I II �III� VIIIII I �� I IIII I II II II I I�� Y��IJ�� I I II I I II li it i I II u� I I�lllf � l�l l� hI � I I�I�I��� �I� � I tf BRICKELL AVE/SE 7 ST EXISTING PM PEAK soon 000 i ow 700 i we N U me N W 40C 1 I SOt 201 10 00 I A TIME LEGEND NO THRU SO THRU TOTAL I I I � ar I I i r • dl s t ,a ' a Ii I I II I I IiI I � 4 11 I R � 1 i ` III p II I .7 I k , I JJ JJ II t , ����I�Ih,i ��IV�illlll!�III�LIII llll��� li kl'+< 9 i . W 2 AVE/FLAGLER ST EXISTING PM PEAK r i 4W ow 200 i 250 ' N W U 200 N ' I W ,1 iao 1 f, loc f ac �I is �+ c LEGEND I SO THRU CIS THRU TOTAL r TIME + i Iwo 1 i sw 1 sw i aw N W U so1 N i I i � !1 3 1 SE 2 AVE/SE 2 ST EXISTING PM PEAS 700 o •. •dp 1 � M �• ° 4. is 4010 4@ 45 s8 bo Bois s. s0 s. 4s a k LEGEND _. SO THRU i —_-- WS THRU TOTAL �. TIME o� r i s�o 400 i s0i0 250 N W U 200 w � W- is0 W' O NE 2 AVE/NE 5 ST EXISTING PM PEAK TIME LEGEND _._. ..._ S9 THRU ---- E9 THRU TOTAL n '7"RAhlSPt7F7TAT I "M F:iESFEE AF::;z GEtVTER \ CFI I T I CAL__ M C3 %.,' F=7 MEhiT AtVAI_ . YS I S \� E{ i 13C—_4NYP41^ F41_411 i 114 T t? ST UAl E I: ): I S I I tici F1.1 PE 61 LEVEL OF SIf VICE Ir_+ SAT IlRol l (1Id "-7 CR I T I("(',I H ;'(JI. 7. f CR 17 I CAI E/ ICJ V01 1 .�? 7 CE-; I T I CAI . SLIM t? -7 Y•ti0-#•►fi+.4a446-:.4 aa►.araww.ci}..►�a.�Lti� LANE GEOME:TC':1' NORTHBOUND SOUTHI+OUH11 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 P.. 12. RT. 1�'. RIL. 12.0 RTL 12.0 2 T.. 1'2. f.. 12.0 ... .... ... ... . 3 T.. 12.0 L. 12.0 ... .... ... .... 4 L.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOL. LIMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 57 30 101 5 THRU 1433 972 16 35 RIGHT 10 29 65 100 TRUCKS (%> LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 2 0 .99 SOUTHBOUND 2 ii .95 EASTBOUND 2 0 .8 WESTBOUND 2 0 .97 PHASING N/S :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W :3. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (NO OVERLAP) PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 1(.-) SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 775 563 197 141 LEFT 29 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NnPT(a�.a,,.,., Sc;.�T• �-.�:: �:� E :. • f.��.�r�,��^at1 i 30 101 5 __- ADJUSTED VOL 29 0 95 0 CAPACITY 212 O O 11 MOVEMENT N/A OK N/A N/A 86--849." 'TRANSF-="FcTAT'IQIV F'ESFAJRCH CENTER CCF;' I T I CA1.- ML7VFEE MEt\lT ln#hlAL._YS I S IVE 2 AVt= / F14F D A T F l: Y I S:l'T l 1JG Prl PEAL. LEVEL OF SFRVICF A SATUP1,01ION 38 CRITICAI. ll,'S VUi. 755S CRITICAL F'"W VUI. 7 1 CRITICAL_ S(.JM �5&l. �..r. iwr..r .�+i �L DIY#ii it �.L �►Y LANE (F(7ME= T K; v NORTHBOUND SOIITIABO1ND EASTROCIND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV bJ I D1 H MCJV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 T. 10.0 RT. 12.0 RL. 10.0 ... .... 2 LT. 10.0 T. 12.C► ... .... ... .... -- 3 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... -__ 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... =: 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... IsTRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 83 0 95 0 THRU 495 429 0 0 RIGHT 0 66 94 0 r, TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (# /HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR -_- NORTHBOUND 2 0 .96 -- SOUTHBOUND O 0 .91 EASTBOUND 0 0 .87 WESTBOUND 2 O 1 t PHASING N/ S :5. DIRECTION SEPERAT I ON E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION s PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY ; 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) --- CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT — NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND — THRU —RIGHT 302 283 O O LEFT O O 71 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND -- INPUT VOLUME 83 0 95 0 - ADJUSTED VOL 52 0 71 0 — CAPACITY 4 0 0 it MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A ma . 09 o: '*"R'ANSF ciFrTAT I (7h1 FRESE_on, F=;z CF= m-re:R CFZZ I T I f;'AL_ MVF_-ME.'N-T P44At__ YE3 I S h1 I`l T A 1" 1 T /A',.^' F=- / (',1 f=. _r hA f F: E ) l E1 11,41 f.11 F'Ei)f t_F_VF l OF SEI V I CF /--N - SATIlRF41 l (1111 " I CRITIC+�f fdif V(:)L f 2 C3 C;R I T I C:AI- `:�1!t i "• i Kri.YaF ac rc;ic �acays �-. aia.aa .. ..• ... ...»►. .au �i. a LANE GE0111"1RY" NORTHBOUND SOI tTHROH1JI, E.ASTPOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOO WIDTH NOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 R1 . 1 1 RT. 1 1 .0 R.. 10.0 R.. 11.0 2 T.. 11.11 LT. 11.Cl T.. 10.0 T.. 11.0 3 ... .... ... .... L.. 10.0 ... .... 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... S... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... b... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHROUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 7 0 82 O THRU 303 288 163 198 RIGHT 14 96 91 80 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (##/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 0 .87 SOUTHNOUND 2 0 .93 EASTBOUND 2 0 .95 WESTBOUND 2 0 .77 PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 (#iPEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 1 Z)O SECONDS .CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 192 218 175 262 LEFT O 0 51 0 LEFT TURN CHECK' NORTHBOUND F►,C-7F } !rl01i WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 7 0 82 0 ADJUSTED VOL O 0 51 0 CAPACITY O 26 0 138 MOVEMENT OK OK N/A OK c 7 c rywr... C, "rRANSIP'IORTAT I MM RESEARCH CENTEF:;t C� I T I CAL__ MClVEMEhlT AfVA!___ YS I S E4TSiCAYP4E7 E-4!..VF)/hlFEE 13 5T 1) Al F E X I S T J HF( PM F'EAI LEVEL CIf SEF:VJ( F C' S01 l)RiaT 1 (114 "7 E-, CE'J1ICAI_ 14/S V01 -?'7Alf- C'R I T I CAL SUrl 1. _72 !___F S NORTHBOUND SOUTHP01011) EAS1 ROUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 10.0 RT. 14.0 RTL 14.0 RT. 10.0 2 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ... .... LT. 10.0 3 L.. 14. 0 I_. . Icl. i_► ... .... E_.. 10.0 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 197 120 25 73 THRU 1439 938 97 92 RIGHT 45 35 33 150 TRUCk,S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 0 .91 SOUTHBOUND 3 0 .88 EASTBOUND 1 0 .78 WESTBOUND 3 0 .93 PHASING N/S :4. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2. 100 — 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 105 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 669 541 161 120 LEFT 170 105 0 0 LEFT TURr: CHEC. NORTHBOUND SOUTH80UND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 197 120 25 73 ADJUSTED VOL 189 105 0 45 CAPACITY 687 O 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A T-F?AMfE;1 MF?TAT I (3" F.ESEAF;tGI-1 CEhlTEFt CF? T T _I M " '%/ F=� M FF hlT AhlAL_ YS I ra tV E 1 A w FE: % J :` cF P%f"i-� T t--! FZ A M P' DO I F E X I ST I NC, PM F='F_Ak LEVEL F.IF SF= RV I CF F= SATURAlI014 94 CRITICAL NiS VFIt_ -7"'6 CR I T I CAL SUM 7. cS S' 1 LANE GRONFTR'r NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... R.. 12.0 2 T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... T.. 12.0 3 L.. 11.0 ... .... ... .... ... .... 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... A --- ---- .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 592 0 0 0 THRU 667 0 0 693 RIGHT 0 0 0 22 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (11/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 12 0 .91 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 24 O .89 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH - : 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 430 O O 965 LEFT 726 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 592 0 0 0 ADJUSTED VOL 726 0 0 0 CAPACITY 687 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A (a 4 m AN m t3 F=l FR _r 9-1% _r 1 INJ F:;z E7 f=; F-7 onk F? C_: " (—_ E: m _r 1E F:4t I-- t T I CAL M W F7-- M F=—: t-,l lF 0A f",l A I - 'Y'C-3 1 C-3 Df)TF EXISTING F'M F'E4- I-EVEL OF SERF ICE. SAl (JR00 I ON 76 CRJTIEA(.. N/SD V01. CRITICAL SUH 1 -I- LANE (3E[)HFTF_,.'Y NORIH80UND SOUTHE(DIRAD EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 To. ]].0 To. 12.0 2 To. 11. .... To. 12.0 3 To. 11. .... ... 4 5 .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOLIND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 0 0 0 THRU 1230 0 0 974 RIGHT 0 0 0 0 TRUCKS LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 12 0.BB SOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 24 0 B2 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND, EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 574 0 0 773 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHbOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 0 0 0 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 0 0 CAPACITY 687 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 86-849' ANS1=10FtTAT I Clm FZCESIEARCH CENTER GR I T T GAL_ MOVE=_MENT ANA1._.YS I S PJE 22 AVIE/ I c-? 7-3 hJc_tr-- -T1-4F{(aMP DAl E PM PEAk LEVEL- OF 5EII: V I CL- (- SAT I IFAT I I)rJ 33 CRITIr_"Al r.I%, VnL '_77 r -71 ' CRITICAL 5,1JI.1 O i LANE: G[:O!lFTR; NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 ... .... T.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 ... .... 2 ... .... LT. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ... .... 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... b... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 1 0 0 THRU 0 332 336 0 RIGHT O 0 263 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (##/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 1 SOUTHBOLIND 5 0 .9 EASTBOUND 3 0 .9 WESTBOUND O 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 (OPEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NOR•rHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 0 203 384 0 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTkiBOUND SOUTH60UND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 1 0 0 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 0 O CAPACITY 687 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A � `843�" -rORAmfs1=* F?-r -r ICJ INS F?ESEAFcCH CENTER CF? I r I G:AL-- Mf7VFMF= M-r AtNlAI_-_YS I S i M FEE AVF= 1 T =':9 f-3(:1I-.-f'T1-f F=-cF-NMF=' DA7 r F y' I S;7 T Fit(; PM F'EAt 1-.EVE[ OF c<E kV T CE (-N SAT I IR:AT T (IN 31 CRITICAL N/S %)OI _.� 9 =' • CRITICAL 511H r56:_ti ► { LANE GEOt•1l-' I R;Y NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 ... .... ., T.. 12.i► T.. 1<.4 ... .... 2 ... .... T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 50 O 0 THRU 0 535 256 0 RIGHT 0 O O O TRUCKS ('/.) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND O 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 .89 EASTBOUND 4 0 .82 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION I PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 0 239 324 O LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHEM,' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 50 0 0 ADJUSTED VOL 0 24 0 0 CAPACITY 6B7 0 0 0 1� MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 8G-84" "T!?AfVSPC)F7TAT I tJhl F1EtE3EAF;�CH CENTEF; CF? I -T" I CAL.. MC P1L=-.I -T At--'YS I S 1Lg I S C . ink M iw' It 1 _ l.! F3 ! T " E� f A i` 1 F~ DnT F E Y I S 11 tJr FM PEAI rs LEVEL OfF:1:'T CC !� SA10F:AT I.'N CRITICAL V01. 75U3 1 '. 1 CRITICAL SUM 9 _ 14 a r LANE GFOMFTF 'r r NORTHBOUND SOLITHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 R.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 ... .... 2 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L".. 12.0 ... .... - 3 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ... .... 4 T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... = b ... .... ... .... ,.. .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES =� NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT O 0 614 0 THRU 1409 1041 0 0 -- RIGHT 421 0 20 O - TRUCES t%> LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR r' NORTHBOUND 5 0 .91-1 = SOUTHBOUND 5 0 .91 EASTBOUND 5 0 .99 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED £. E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS i CRIT1CAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 5B7 440 0 O _ LEFT 0 0 341 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND rt fir: INPUT VOLUME 0 0 614 O ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 650 0 - CAPACITY 143 0 0 0 MOVEMENT 01.*; OK N/A N/A • 8f-84� .. M C3 *,/ e: M E: M -T sco M #!4 1 Ne E; I E; Me: I #Cll IN/ [_7 .I f%,l F- e, C3 -V • DA T E. EXT5TING RM LEVEL nF 54'RIVICE f--4 SATURAT I ON 43 CP I'T I COf N - V01 - 4 dT LANF GEONFIR"Y NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EAST POUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH ITe. 11. 61) ... .... ... RT. 14.0 2 T*. 11.4) .... ... T.* 12.0 3 LT. 12.0 o.. .... 00.0 .0. .... 4 • .. .... 0.00 6.0 0.60 6 o.. .... ... 0.0. ..a a*.. TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 96 0 0 0 THRU 871 0 0 291 RIGHT 0 0 0 314 TRUCKS LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 4 0 .8 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 4 0 .87 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THR& -RIGHT 442 0 0 332 LEFT 0 c 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK N C. R r 0 c: 4, D INPUT VOLUME 9b 0 0 ADJUSTED VOL at 0 0 0 CAPACITY 312 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A SC-84g."! f } y •i f �- i } i ''f`�=2ANSF'C]F�TAT I Oft FiE:�E�ARGH CENTER Y= rR T T =GAI_- Mt7VEMFhlT A1VAL..YS I S lritaY .'3 DAT F I Y. I O T I N('� I'I1 F'EAt 1FiFiFi##1i1'* iii+ +*�'M+#**49 41 LEVEL OF SEf I CI: A SAT URAT T ON 37 . ! . CR I T I CAI.. N ; s ; Vol :7. CRITICAI__ ��(Jtl F. t I...ANE (-iEOt1E--Tf;:Y NORTHBOUND SUIJTHI+taUtJl) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Y. LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... RT. 18.0 2 T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... T.. 12.0 3 T.. 12.o ... .... ... .... ... .... - 4 LT. 12. .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... rw 6 .. ... . TRAFFIC VOLUMES - NORTHBOUND SOUTHEOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 57 0 O 0 THRU 847 0 0 341 _- •••• RIGHT 0 0 0 153 ' TRUCKS ('/.> LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 0 .79 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 5 0 .66 - PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SDUTH)BOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 304 O 0 365 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK. NGriThB uiJf.ID SOU rHBUUNU EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 57 0 0 0 ADJUSTED VOL 28 0 0 0 CAPACITY 312 0 0 0 , F: MOVEMENT N/ A nv:4 N/A rL 'fi IANSF'ORTAT I ON RESEARCH CENTER CR I T I GAL_ h'tOVFEE h'iF tVT !aR*!AL___ YS i S N W _._-. C T/ r%j (..,! e_r S T DATE EXIc;1I14 Pm FT At LEVEL (IF f�FE•:V I CE SAT 1 fk,(�l I OW 16 CRITICAE. H.'S VOl_ 1 i CR I T I CAi _ 4�? 10 L ANL GE OMEI RY NORTHBOUND SOUTHEAOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH i... .... RT. 13.0 T.. 17.0 ... .... T.. 12.0 ... .... T.. 10.0 3 ... .... T.. 12.0 ... .... L.. 10.0 4 ... .... T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ... .... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT O O 0 155 THRU O 297 O 231 RIGHT 0 60 0 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL_ BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .@ EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 2 0 .75 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND !� THRU -RIGHT O 121 O 148 'i LEFT 0 O 0 169 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOU THBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME O 0 O 155 { ADJUSTED VOL CAPACITY 0 312 0 0 0 169 I MM F;Z e: E3 t_=7 #=k rR C-_F=M-rE:M I-- F;Z I -r T 1. M "_ WE---- M U=- f%4 -r ont M I_. Ne 13 1 c-3 0 1 is C__ 10N 'Ile F%lj I=- E�c L.- %/ ID z m U.: � f3 -T PAI F E x J F�l i rlff� Flm PEAl.. Ell.lc--( (IF !__ERVICE C_ SAI Ilik'Al I (it') 67 C R 17 1 CAI N /5 vn(.. 4� e---* 4 C P ! T T r'r!l I P 't,) "0I 14 -7 LANE GEnNE'rf;'Y NORTHBOUND SCILJTHBnt IND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH I RT. 20.0 To. 13.0 RT. 15.0 *Now 2 To. 12.0 To. 13.0 To. I I) . 0 *of,* 3 To. 12.0 LT. 12.0 Leo 15.0 see. 4 To. 12.() L. . 12.0 .00 .060 5 *so .... ... 6 .... ... .00. TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 119 225 0 THRU 1638 1307 138 0 RIGHT 54 0 126 0 TRUCKS LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 0 .8 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 .96 EASTBOUND 5 (1 .95 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 547 417 142 0 LEFT 0 197 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SCUTHZ••Z—jUoO EASTDOUNID WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 119 225 0 ADJUSTED VOL 0 95 219 0 CAPACITY 312 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 87-949,� , 9 ir m A r4 cs F=- (3 F=;z -ir eA -i-- i c) Ni F=< EE r-3 Er- #=4 FR C-- " (_- Fz m -r I-= st f— m I- 1 -1 F=- 1,-j -T 4:4 1\1 I _%e f3 T c-3 IVE OLIN lvp [E- DA T F F Y I + LEVEL OF r N SATUR#7iT I ON 32 CRITICAl tl/', ',,'ni T7; f:3 LANE GEO ME -T F: y NORTHBOUND . ClUND SOIJI HROIR41' P EOST WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 T. 14.0 Rr. 11.0 2 T. . 131. 0 T. . 12.0 3 LT. 11.() T. . 12.0 4 ... .... 6 ... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHROUND, EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 98 0 0 THRU 0 542 352 0 RIGHT 0 0 218 0 TRUCKS LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 SOUTHROUND 11 0 .85 EASTBOUND 2 0 .75 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2. 100 - 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND, EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 0 290 298 0 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TUPN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND, EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 98 0 0 ADJUSTED VOL 0 93 0 0 CAPACITY 0 485 0 0 Ift F:;t I -Ir I I-- A I— M C3 0: M F= P4 _r ich A I- 'e S3 X S Ma o=k f IV I=--- TT, 8 -T- DATE EXIS111,16 FM PEAt; ***# 41 # *41 * 0 *+ # *# **-0 ****** LEVEL nF SERVICE OA SATURATION 34 CRITICAI.. N , /S V01, 7 4f-:� CRITICAL E/W V01 let = LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHSOUND EASTROUNT.) WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH IRT. 11 . cl ... ..... T.. 11.0 .00 *a.* 2 T.. 11.0 T.. 11.0 ... .... 3 T.. 11.0 . ... LT. 11.0 0.0 Soo" 4 .... ... .*o. ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... ..o. 6 o.. a .0. .... ... .... .00 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT co 0 300 0 THRU 730 0 332 0 RIGHT 138 0 0 0 TRUCKS LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 0 .84 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 1 0 o89 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 376 0 242 0 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK J. r- I - '71 jL-1; i I-j!. I. NORTi--.!'QUND SOUTHSOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME -O o 300 0 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 314 0 CAPACITY 312 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 's 86-849:- ocN c: e: r,.j -r r=- F;z IFNI 1.70 E3 -F I NG, Ftl PEAK, I-Evul (IF SAT(jf-A T I CIN 24 CR J T I CAI_ II 11-i VOL 1. 1 LANE NORTHBOUND SOLFT HE(OUND Ei)51 BOUND WESTBUUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 110V WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 1".. 11.0 RT. 11.0 ... .... 2 T.. It.v T.. I1.0 ... .... 1. T. 0 T.. 11.0 ... 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 79 0 0 THRU 0 176 541 0 RIGHT 0 0 56 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 .72 EASTBOUND 0 0 .67 WESTBOUND 1 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 — 99 (OPEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOU14D EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 0 110 323 0 LEFT 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NOR rhaZUND SOUTHBOU14D EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 79 0 0 ADJUSTED VOL 0 62 0 0 CAPACITY 312 0 0 0 MOVEMENT NIA N/A N/A N/A JM 'A c I I Q TRAhts1=1 fz;zT!-NT I Qt\! F1't:SEAF'tCH 4__E7P4_r = F;t CR T T' T C!-41__- rl(JWEMEP%l-1 Af\lAI._YS I S Dry TF E->: l f T l IJG FM PEA1 LEl'E:1_ OF �,17 k.1 I C.1 1:> SATHRAT 1014 S=3 7 CRITICAL VOL ..7�7,4 r T T CRITICAL SLIM 1 :71 Pb 1 LANE (;EOI'lI'TkY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTD011141) WESTBOUND LANE MfIV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 P.T. 12.0 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 2 L.. 12.(-) L.. 12.�► L.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 3 ... .... ... .... ... .... L.. 12.0 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 15B 16 89 86 THRU 292 34 122 657 RIGHT 68 20 37 78 TRUCKS l % ) LOCAL. BUSES ( # / HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 2 0 .78 SOUTHBOUND 3 0 .73 EASTBOUND 3 0 .62 WESTBOUND 1 0 .78 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 2. 100 - 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 492 82 2713 509 LEFT 167 0 92 67 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 158 16 89 86 ADJUSTED VOL 167 0 92 67 CAPACITY 312 0 0 0 MOVEMENT Ill/ A N .1 A M/A s€��s4s TRAhISF"QRTAT T C71�1 F�ESE"AF�(=�t--1 CEhITER CR I T 7 CAI__ MC�VEMEht-1 AtVAI_..YS I S Et I S C A N' tV E E4 I.__ %-" £- ! r%, .1 '.r DATF E>: TST JWC; PM *ice* *-V* 41 LEVEL (JT SA1 11R6T J Ofll 41 CR I T I L"Al_ N %S VOL CRITICAL 5Litl C�9E3 LANE CiEOMF TE''r NORTHBOUND SOUTHPOLINP EAST E401jND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 T.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 ... .... T.. 12.0 2 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ... .... L.. 12.0 3 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... 4 L.. 12.0 T.. 12. o ... .... ... ... . 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 109 0 0 67 THRU 1473 1124 0 68 RIGHT 0 170 O 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 0 .91 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 .92 EASTBOUND 5 0 1 WESTBOUND 5 0 .94 Y PHASING N/S :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2. 100 — 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 623 470 0 75 LEFT 68 0 0 36 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WE5TUUUNU INPUT VOLUME: 109 0 O 67 ADJUSTED VOL 88 0 0 36 CAPACITY 153 O O O MOVEMENT N / A f. v r.t / A 8C-8491~ = , " r`MF% NSPCIRTAT ICJINI V,, t:SEA�(7:1--4 1vENTEF� tom:. °;=�:< GR I -I- I C;AL__. M(_ WFE 1�1V:NT Ar.1f 1 YS 1 S -a "T- Di) l E E_ }: I Gl l r•!G 111 F E=AI LE VF"L OF I (_, SA1( IRAT I ON 28 cl- CR I T IC Al E i bl CRITICAL `._lIt.l LANE GEflr•l[' TFY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOLND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 ... .... RT. 10.0 ... .... T.. 11.0 - _ 2 ... .... T.. 10.i► ... .... LT. 11.0 3 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... `. q .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOLIND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND _ LEFT 0 0 0 124 THRU 0 246 0 321 RIGHT 0 B5 0 O TRUCES (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 _ SOUTHBOUND 5 0 .87 i EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 5 0 .78 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2. 100 — 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES THY MOVEMENT - NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 0 219 0 292 LEFT 0 0 0 LEF E I Ljil.fi LHE .I . - NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND - INPUT VOLUM' 0 O 0 124 _ ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 0 132 CAPACITY lnn '� ► , v ce_4� Pt Omk M _c3 Fz' " F:,Z I - o!=# - r T ON FZ IFF -_3 FE 0=% IR (-_ " C7_ U M -r i=- M r.__ F< 1 -ir 1 c: 0A I- M (-I %vA F= M FEE. P,111 -1F eA M " L- Ne E3 I S; P4 tAj or--N 4%/ F- ../ f q IAJ 1 DA 11, F.X i �, I I llj(Pm F,Eol Sill l IkA 111 III 47 4 -W k 4 4. 4­0 NORTHBOtIND 501TIAUc(R,INI, FA531 BOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH mov WIDIH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH I T.. 10. () R.. 15.0 R.. 12.0 2 L.. 10.0 T.. 12. (:) T.. 12.0 3 ... .... .... ... .... LT. 12.0 4 ... .... ... .... .... ... 5 .... ... .... ... 6 .... ... .... ... ... .... TRAFFIC VOI-OMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 86 0 0 124 THRU 480 180 0 314 RIGHT 0 81 0 38 TRUCKS LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 2 0 .84 SOUTHBOUND 3 0 .76 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 1 0 .83 PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2. 100 - 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 592 243 0 256 LEFT 17 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND INPUT VOLUME 86 ADJUSTED VOL 17 CAPACITY 339 C Ot.. tows M0VF!4F111T SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 0 0 124 0 0 112 0 0 0 17v 1 86-849;A F;? 0=4 M ES 1=" C) F� -I- icN -F I (-) " FZ F-=' E3 FEE fA V-< C " (::: F-7 M _r I=— T (__ b<N I , m (_1 F=-- m IF t%j -IF AhlA1 Ne E3 I ts w !;2 ink klp I= I= I_ ei4 (___; I - *-v r) (", T F FY 151 J t -1 (y PH PE Af: LEVEL Of- F:7f q,:3 CRII'TCAI ')(-)I l c:rl I CRT 7 1 CAI- !_)(JP1 I 1 1 LANE. GF0t1F'rf_-,, NORTHBOUND SOH I'll 1+004 I.-, EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE mov WIDTH PIOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH I T.. 1 0 RT. 14.(1 R.. 1 (1. 0 RT. 10.0 2 L.. 11. cl L.. 12.0 4 5 ... .... ... .... 6 ... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 140 0 76 67 THRU 241 253 0 353 RIGHT 0 46 76 87 TRUCKS LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 0 .74 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 B3 EASTBOUND 2 0 .84 WESTBOUND 0 0 .913 PHASING N/S :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 2. 100 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOIJTHBOLJ14D EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 328 342 0 470 LEFT 149 0 50 0 NORTHBOUND INPUT VOLUME 140 ADJUSTED VUL 149 CAPACITY 0 MnVFmr-NT SOUTHBOUND 0 0 163 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 76 67 50 0 0 520 i C e*N 4 I "IV F:;t F= _—, V--- on'* F::;Z U-, " U--; e: P4 -r Er F;t C_'F� t -lr I M "_ N.-I F= M FEE 1%11 -7 onk tM f-N I 'Y T c.3 -T- DH I I- E I f -1 1 1 W G 1 1-1 PF_ A I LEVEL_ OF I C L. p"A SATTIkAT T 011 27 cp IT I LAI H c, 11,101 1 e r 47t (iECII-IF NORTHBOUND SOUTHDOUND EAST BOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH I RT. 11.0 ... .... T.. 12.0 2 T.. 11.0 ... .... T.. 12.0 T.. 11.0 .... LT. 12.0 4 ... .... ... .... moo .... ... .... ... .... .0. eve. ... .... ... .... .... ... 60.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 0 278 0 THRU 154 1:1 572 0 RIGHT 129 0 0 0 TRUCK'S LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 6 .71 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 5 0 .94 WESTBOUND 0 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 2. 100 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 164 0 32B 0 LEFT 0 C) 0 0 LEFT T! PH ('!-SFr NUri tHuUUND sou msouiz EAs,rbuuNo WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 0 278 0 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 2133 0 CAPACITY 50 174 0 611 MOVEMENT N/A NIA N/A N/A - eol� 4 M duk M E3 F=C3 FZ -r 07-Is _V I " I%J FR E- '_-:3- ocN F:;: t-1 f_— e: " _r F—=F;t F:;Z I _r I (:,- och I - M (=) k-,p I F-1 tF- " I- fc% enk L - 'y E3 1 13 C-3 Lq Cl� RII/ f 1-1 !_73 L14 .1 �3 _r D(i I F_ L X J',-� I 11,15 1:11 PE Al' LEVF__L Of SAT11f_,'6l 1 (111 45 CR I'l I CRJTICAI SUM 7-71 LANE NORTHBOUND SOU THBOUND EASTD01 IND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 12.0 LT. ll.(-) R.. 11.0 2 T.. 11.() L.. I f), (.1 T.. 11. cl ... 3 ... .... ... .... T.. 11.0 4 ... .... ... .... L.. 13.0 ... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... o.. .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 254 107 0 THRU 278 256 413 0 RIGHT 128 0 48 0 TRUCKS LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 3 0 .93 SOUTHBOUND 4 0 .9 EASTSOU14D 0 cl .92 WESTBOUND 2 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION sp E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 2. 100 - 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE. VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 250 286 235 0 LEFT 0 0 72 0 L 7-i-F T NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 254 107 0 ADJUSTED VOL 0 264 al 0 CAPACITY 50 174 0 611 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A j i jr, MraFVSF'OFRTA T- T QM FBI SFAF:;�CH CE:NTEF2 C F ;t T 1- T M Cl'+! U rri r=_ hl -T � tV !`+ i_.-.1' S :.L S nr,T f E >: t �^ i t 1[r, r r•t r=E�,1. 1-EVEI.. OF �E_f:UICL G Sr;l HFfal t (11.1 74 URI T IC701 H.'�n `.'ni • CRI1 I("'►)L 111•t 14iF�****4*** *+i t#++++r+.04_0.0**-W** fi�i4 ( rr�r r,F nrtr r1= NORTHBOUND S01 i T IAHOUNr- EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOk-' WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 ... .... R.. 11.<J ... .... T.. 10.0 2 ... .... T.. LT. 1C►.0 3 ... .... T.. II ... .... L.. 10.C► 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 8 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... b... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND C` LEFT O 0 0 1905 THRU 0 633 0 292 RIGHT 0 126 0 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 1 0 .89 EASTBOUND 0 C' 1 WESTBOUND 0 0 .82 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : I. Cl - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH - . 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 0 377 0 961 LEFT C► 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 0 0 1905 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 0 2393 CAPACITY 50 174 0 611 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A f:4 n'�l LEE M t-= f'%J T­ OcN Oct I - "le E3 IS' I— F;Z I m 1 m I e-N %,,, UE .-' !E-1 E3 -I D6 I F E >; I 'S' T T t, I[ PH F'Eill LEVEL- OF !A__F-A'1(_,E 1-.:,f Sill til-,*6 T 1 t 114 56 CR I T I U. Al. 1A VOL `ff I C f T I CRI f [coll.. LANE (_4E0l-lF'1r-'f NORTHBOUND SOUT'HPOMAT) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE 110V WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH m 1 T.. I(). 0 T.. I Q. Q RT. 11.0 2 L. I0. LT. 11.0 4�1 4 .... ... .... 5 ... .... 6 .... ... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND ms LEFT 302 0 0 100 THRU 155 137 0 628 RIGHT 0 0 0 27 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 3 0 .85 SOUTHBOUND 3 0 .77 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 1 0 .88 PHASING N/S :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 2. 100 — 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND IHRU —RIGHT I87 I a -"?., 0 435 LEFT 338 0 0 0 LEFT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 302 0 0 100 ADJUSTED VOL 338 0 0 77 CAPACITY 4 334 0 611 t MOVEMENT N/A OK N/A N/A TRANSF'ORTAT I 17N F7ESEAFtCH CENTER CR I -r I CAL_ Mf7VEMEN-.' AhlAI, YS I S E3 F� T c, Fr:: L I_ _ I_. or-4 w r z �__y F-- : S T DATF E X 151 1 Id(; I 'M F'E= Al'. LEVEL OF SERVICE r-� SATI IRAT I ON 50 CRITICAL Id/S VOL 4--1. `5 CRITICAI- EiW V01 {-f CRITICAL SLIM S Lam.: ai A. i U. ♦, Ai. ..4 A. 4. W -N, LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 12.0 RT. 1�C-) ... .... ... .... 2 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... 3 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... 4 L.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... 5 L.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 299 (1 0 0 THRU 1247 1446 0 0 RIGHT 0 219 0 0 .:.<•. TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 0 .75 SOUTHBOUND 1 0 .94 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHASING N/S :4. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 2. 100 — 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 115 SECONDS .CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES B` .10VEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 615 667 0 0 LEFT 198 C1 0 0 LEFT TURIJ CHECK FVOR'T, 1_UWD SC•U - INPU; VOLUME 2;.7 p 0 0 ADJUSTED VOL 378 0 0 0 CAPACITY 0 789 61 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A rt'FtAmE3i—"FRTAT I "m F:ESF=- AF;:CF-4 CEtVTER CFI I -i- 1 t�AI _ t"ft�VEMr ht-1 ANAI_Y17 I `. 1 S1 I hlfl, 1-tl I 'Ef0 I_.F VEa. f1F= S4= F''•J 1 C(= �=1 tiAl t Jf'AT l (]IJ 25 CR I T I -Al. fJ - VOL 1. CRITIFf11 f::'W VOL. CR IT I CAL St.11A 4 4 LANE GEOMF T R Y NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND _ LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MUV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 T. 12.0 ... RT. 11.0 2 T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... T.. 11.0 3 LT. 12.0 ... .... ... .... T.. 11.0 5 ... .. .. .... .... .. 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND - LEFT 187 0 0 0 THRU 231 i► 0 517 - RIGHT 0 U 0 58 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 3 O .89 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 -® EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 1 •77 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 2. 100 - 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS .CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 161 0 0 280 LEFT 0 O 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK. INPUT VULU.-IE 187 0 O O ADJUSTED VOL 190 O O 0 -s CAPACITY 0 789 61 0 = MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 86-849, r 'TRAhISF'CJFi_TA-i' I "_ INJ FrESEAF;Z -" CENTER CR I'T I t✓AL_ MCIVEt''!Fh!-V ANAL_YS I S 4tl w :2 fr4 RN/ I "I !E; 14 7 !7; v C1iN1(- [=Y. T'�T IIJG f 11 FF_%tl LEVEL Elf- E EF?VILE 30 _ CR I T T C. CRITI(-At SIR} 4-C? - - YYii;i:►Y.YY rr. wa •..a .w _.l�.ti�a+a}t�.ia4t L (Ar�r c[c�M[_ TF1•r NORTHBOIINI, SOUTH14001,11) EASThOLIND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV W I [ ,T H MUV WIDTH MOV WIDTH T.. 11. -.T. 11.0 ... .... RT. 11.0 -- s LT. II. T.. 11. T.. 11.Q 3 ... .... ... .... ... .... LT, 11,0 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 .., .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC Vn1_IJMES __- NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOIND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 52 0 0 145 THRU 332 207 0 557 RIGHT 0 93 0 50 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR -- NORTHBOUND 5 0 Be. SOUTHBOUND 4 0 .B4 --_ EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 5 0 .8 PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 207 1''2 0 342 1 LEFT 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK u 0 145 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 0 158 CAPACITY 15 0 61 0 MOVEMENT OK OK N/A N/A C11 ` "ii tANSPOFtTAT I ON FcESEARGH CENTER CR IT I GAL_. MOVEMEhJ-T AtVAI_YS I S DATE U X 1 �,T i Id(. PM F'CAF.: <' LEVEL OF ICE. Ot SA111RAl lOFF! 21 t CR 1 T I CAI N '} V0I C-, !-3 CkITTCAI. 1": W V01 7 i. i I. AN1= (SE UME TRY NORTHBOUND SOL(THHOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH ' 1 T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... RT. 11.0 2 L.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... T.. 11.0 ... .... ... .... ... .... LT. 11.0 —_® 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... -_ 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .. ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 26 0 0 57 -- � THRU 30 C) 0 639 RIGHT O 4 O 13 TRUCKS (Y.) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 3 O .45 SOUTHBOUND O 0 1 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 1 0 .93 — PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. O — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 66 0 0 301 LEFT O C ► 0 0 I -EFT T0PN CHECK _ NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 26 0 0 57 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 0 34 CAPACITY 0 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A C-4 4 fVSF'CF7TAT I MM FzkESFEE AF;: CENTEF? CFI I T T CAS Ml7VEMEhIT ANAI__YS I S SW AVE / SW 7 S 1- 5 F;cAMF' DA1 L F.X 1151 I !dG P'l f EAI'. LEVEL Of S ("F'V T (,E T_,; sAl()Rra1 TON 56 C R I T I CA(. N; :, '-AIL e--:), 4 CRITIC.AI EiW LANE GEOMF T PY I " RAMP SOUTHPOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH iT.. 12.0 RT. 16.Q ... .... T.. 14.0 2 To 12.0 T.. 12.0 .., ...p LT. 11.0 3 To. 12.0 ... .... ... poop L.. 11.0 .4 . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p . . . . . . . . . 5 6 ... . . . .... . . . . ... . . . poop . . . . ... .o.. . . . . . . • ... . . . .... . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 0 0 353 THRU 1260 169 0 360 RIGHT 0 18 0 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 3 0 .86 SOUTHBOUND 3 0 .82 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 3 0 .85 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 553 11O 0 296 LEFT 0 C► 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK wui h6uLd4u SuUIhBuuwU EASTBOUND WE5Tb0UND INPUT VOLUME 0 0 0 353 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 0 410 CAPACITY 0 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A y t R0:%Mc.3F'OF;TAT I C7N F<ESE0=4F:Z CENTER CR I T I Cf-NL_ MC1tlFMF__P4`V AhlAL_YS I !E3 E4 R I C; V_ U:_7- I - I __ (A v IE / t= S _T DAZE F x I S I ING Pri V Ak: LEVEL OF L=F:'JTCF (—1 SATIIf Al ION f_-' CRITICAL_ V01- !7f CRITICAI E/trJ CkITICAI_ SlJrt 8_7c? .ram ���a�.... .� .-r.. ...+ ���-�•.�r.. .►rTi •Y�i LANE GEOMET F y NORTHBOUND SnUTHP0UND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 11.0 T.. 1-.0 R.. 1<.0 R.. 10.0 2 T.. 1 1 .0 T.. 12. T.. 12.0 RL. 11 .0 3 T.. I1.0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 10.0 4 ... .... L.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ... .... 5 ... 12. 0 ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 98 298 ISO THRU 771 1240 93 0 RIGHT 63 0 185 294 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 C► .86 SOUTHBOUND 1 .87 EASTBOUND 1 0 .87 WESTBOUND 4 0 .93 PHASING N/S :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 2. 100 — 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 115 SECONDS -CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 362 527 56 0 LEFT 0 42 170 182 LEFT TURN CHECK: INPUT VOLUME U 98 298 180 ADJUSTED VOL 0 81 325 174 CAPACITY 0 165 0 0 MOVEMENT OK N/A N/A N/A c . C 4c s LANE i �. ... .... T.. 12.C► 2 T. 12.0 ... .... T.. 12.0 3 ... .... ... .... LT. 12.0 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... b... .... �.. .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES 'T'RANSF QR1-44-F I Qh! FRESFEE FAF:CH CENTER GR I T I GF=w!_ M©VEMEtVT AtVAI_YS I S S M I H t"i .1 1(4 V F_ ! CE-11 E3 S Tv DATE E X 15'T I NG RM PEAP, LEVEE OF S�,FNVICE E-N SATURAT I UN 24 CRITICAL N%L:� VOL_ :f3 CRITICAL E/14 V01 1 C-7 1 CRITICAL SUM 4 C? LANE GEONETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHDOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH Rr 1 � c► NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 U 90 0 THRU 336 0 418 0 RIGHT 41 0 0 O TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 2 0 .84 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 2 0 .93 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 238 0 191 0 LEFT 0 C► 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTgOBM G�f.!<<D Z NPUT VQLWME t 90 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 69 0 CAPACITY 423 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 86-849, - s TFiANS1=`"FRTAT I "l-J F::ZESI= Ono FZ(-- 1 CEhITEFr I— F;Z I T I C A I__ 6` "l vP E_ M E ht -i- A 1\1 L.. Y S I S DATE F-7 I' -IT Ii)G PM F'EAI. LEVI(. OF SFF:'•11� c SAT UFiAT I (.1Id 14 CRITICAL 'AIL y' 9 CR I T I CAl E i ld "'101- CRITICAI EUM r 9 LANE GE(.(ME T'l:Y a NORTHBOUND SOUTHH01IND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MnV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 R.. 12.0 ... .... T.. 12.0 ... .... 2 T.. 12.C► ... .... T.. 12.() ... .... 3 ... .... ... .... LT. 12.0 ... .... 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLU11ES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT (1 0 49 0 THRU 22 0 530 0 RIGHT 86 0 0 0 TRUCKS ('1.) LOCAL RUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 3 .78 SOUTHBOUND i) CI 1 EASTBOUND 2 0 .93 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 29 0 220 0 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK: 71 INPUT VOLUME 0 U 49 0 ADJUSTED VOL O 0 21 0 CAPACITY 423 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A TRANSr—(3Fc-IF AT I t7N RET-73EAFCCH CI=LATFEE R CCR I T T t--F4L. MQ4lE["ENT 0'nwN0!:NI__YS I S C3W 4- AV'I DATF F_ ?. 1 51 11,15 F"ll F EAf LEVF:I_ OF 5EI;VIC1_ A SAT URAT I (It,l 45 CRITICAI. N/57 V01- A CR I T I CAI E W VOI- ' E3 CRITICAL. SLIM LA14E GEOI IEIRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHPrUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 ... .... T.. 1(I. o) RT. 15.0 ... ... . 2 ... .... LT. 12.0 T.. 11.0 ... .... 3 ... .... L.. 12.0 T.. .B.O ... .... 4 . . . . . . . L . . 12.0 . . . . . . . pop .000 5 ... .... .. . ... .... ... .... 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT C► 685 0 0 THRU 0 695 917 0 RIGHT 0 0 95 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 2 Cl .93 EASTBOUND 6 0 .97 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS .CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 0 407 398 O LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK Iiv�=tJ7 Jlii.�:r�c U ot3:, 0 0 ADJUSTED VOL. O 754 O O CAPACITY 423 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A y ,rtRA"SF=}[7s<-"A-r I n" F;zF=.St=ink F=rCH (--F=-N-i"UFF•c 1-:Fi T -T- T CAI-__ M " W FF MF7Iq-1- A1V0!::-NL_ VS I S F1F;:;Z 1 C;1-="F=.1. -L_ #4W1_ i �31=. I � T DA T E I ►. I ; 1-1 N(; 1=1.1 F'F 01. +•+++**4•***+++►+++++►4+*4%*A' tip+ I_EVFI_ OF SE W)I CE C1 SATI -14) T 1 111J 4-, -7 T T_ CR I T 1 CAI E: %W V01 `_ �7r A CRITIC►A. 51111 1 1. +->t7 t_ANF (,'E011F1 R r' i NORTHBOLJ14D SOIITHF- OUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 11.o R.. R.. 11.O R.. 12.0 2 •r.. 11.C► T.. 11..E L.1•. 11.(' LT. 12.t► a T.. 1 1 . 0 L_.. 11 .4 5 ... .... ... .... .. .... ... ... 6 .. ... .. ... .... ... ... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES _ NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTROU14D WESTBOUND LEFT 81 a 211 82 THRU 452 1390 22 144 RIGHT 12 452 165 18 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL. BUSES (# / HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0"► .9 - SOUTHROUND 1 i .92 EASTBOUND 4 0 .91 WESTBOUND 2 0 .6 PHASING N/S :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 5. D I RECT I O14 SEPERAT I ON PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 115 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 270 801 125 126 LEFT 57 (1 0 0 L&; i i hJ i,4 tLIr_L1;. NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 81 8 211 82 .. ADJUSTED VOL 57 0 215 67 ' CAPACITY Sf36 �� n 0 ;. `fi` AIVSPUF4TAT I ON RESEARG1A CENTER r CR I -T" I CAl_ mC?'.1E-ZF"EP11_v ANOno L.YS I S DATE_ E-_ X I ::;T I NG f='M F'E AF I-EVEL.. 01 t?' SATURAT l ()11 7 = CRITICAL. N JUI S� 15 CRITICAL -•.. ( CRITICAL F t.!O1_ 5�} ` CRITICAL S U1.1 1 2. c? LANE NORTHBOUND SO11TIAPO 1N1, EAST FOL.IND WESTBOUND LANE MOV W I DTH MOV W 11)1 H MOV 14I DTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. I I . (I RT. ] 1. RT. 12.0 RTL 12.0 2 LT. II.tl LT. 11.i► L.. 12.0 ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ... .... -i 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... �( 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 40 14 28 101 THRU 295 1373 32 30 C, RIGHT 42 59 105 10 TRUCKS (%) LnCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR ® NORTHBOUND 5 e3 SOUTHBOUND 5 O .88 EASTBOUND 5 0 •79 WESTBOUND 5 .68 PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPFRATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY ]. U - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 115 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 222 895 181 173 LEFT O G 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECk: NORTHBOUND SOUTH.P01IND EF INPUT VOLUME 40 14 28 101 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 O 112 CAPACITY O 673 61 0 MOVEMENT OK OK N/A N/A 86-849�•' y "i"MAMc_3f--nF;ZTAT T "M F<U=. =Aft::" CEh1TER CFI I I I f.^!al__ M"VFMI==M`t- Rh!AI__YS I S F r S(.,�lYhlF= il_cI . k./T? /1VI 7 "=.;;, -T- DC;TE PH 1 AF'f'fRl1VFD F'M l_EVEI_ OF SAT LIRA 110H 7 CR IT I CAI. N;: vni 1 cip4 i CRITICAl F/W V01_ 1 E-,f_-, CF:'I71CAl_. SIiF1 1_ i='{-�7 I. ANE NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUNI, EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE_ MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH i R. 12. <7 R1 . 1 :'. +.I R71- 12.( RTl_ 12.0 2 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... 3 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... 4 L.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOL1ND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 75 30 101 5 THRU 1925 1191 16 35 RIGHT 10 29 65 100 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 2 0 .99 SOUTHROUND 2 0 .95 EASTBOUND 2 cl .95 WESTBOUND 2 0 .97 PHASING N/S :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W :3. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (NO OVERLAP) PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS -CRITICAL LANE VOl_ )MES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOU1D WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 1041 686 166 141 LEFT 48 0 0 0 i LEFT TURN CHECK 1 NPU T VOLU!•IL 75 a0 101 5 ADJUSTED VOL 48 0 80 0 CAPACITY 35; 0 0 11 MOVEMENT N/A OK N/A N/A J T' A1VSF•[�FcTA"T I 7N Fes!✓ SEAF�CH Ct=NTER C CFt I T T GAt— M"VF-7M A4lf= / tit- .�-► j- N41L F'H 1 P1.1 L-EVFI t i ';Al I IRAI T 014 4: CF:I T IC;Ai (•I;'!:� Vt11 -1 "7 ., . CR1TI('r'=,L C•ll '•:'(71 f�:-i _ CR I T I ('At. SI Ir1 1 4 ,? � �If... l►►i.•rJa.�•«.... ..�...... .. ter.. ... s•►i i NORTHBOUND SnUTHPnI iNt FAF;Tt+OlJNn WESTBOUND i LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIUIH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH i T.. IQ.0 RT . 12, i::r RL. 10.0 ... ... . 2 L.T. 1Q T.. 12.t� ... .... ... .... 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... s... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... — 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMFS NORTHBOUND SOLITHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND a LEFT 101 U 95 0 THRU 614 480 0 0 C� RIGHT 0 66 103 0 - r ::•:..; TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (tt /HR) PEAS: HOUR FACTOR _ NORTHBOUND 2 O .96 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 .95 EASTBOUND 0 C► .95 =f WESTBOUND 2 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 99 (MPEDS/HR) - 1 CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS t CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTiABOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND _- THRU -RIGHT 378 299 0 O I -�1 LEFT 0 0 65 O LEFT TURN CHECF•. =— I NFU"i VOLOrtE 10 1 0 95 O -= -� ADJUSTED VOL_ 72 O 65 O CAPACITY 4 0 O 11 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A ot r-A -_3 F=. " F:;: --I - A -F T " F,< F7-- � E:_ A F:<- (-- " CENTER C'-': FZZ I -Ir T (7_,'FN I __ M C-I F-:::- M I=- f111 -V #,A t.-, V c_3 I E3 DA 11 1:11 1 AVIT-TIV17D PM LEVFI. (if r- N SAT (IN CRITICAL_ (I'S %)(11 CRITICAI F N 0 1 :7� CR, 17 T (rl LANE TF't NORTHBOUND SOU7 HIA11 it'll EAEiTFntJl4D WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH r10V Wl I)TH NOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. I I . RT. j I . R.. IC). (..) R.. 11.0 2 T.. 11. LT. I 1 .0 T.. 10.41 T.. 11.0 3 ... .... ... .... L. . 1 Co. 0 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 7 9 82 0 THRU 382 322 163, 19B RIGHT 14 96 91 so TRUCKS LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 0 .95 SDUTHBOUND 2 0 .95 EASTBOUND 2 0 .95 WESTBOUND 2 0 .95 PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 220 233 175 212 LEFT 0 0 51 0 LEFT TURN CHECK 7 7 1 1* INPUT VUL::r.E 7 9 82 0 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 51 0 CAPACITY 0 13 0 as MOVEMENT OK OK N/A nw 'E - f 'i MANSP[3F:-TAT T f]M fRFEE SFAFC;H CENTER •�' 'J� CY.`R I T l CAL_.. MC)VEf'-1EN T !`►i'JF�I.... YS I S Et :T C A Y tV F 11._ V i7 : t�•i f- # ``: S i Pi,TF F''I+ ) I...LVEI_ OF E SA1 (JF;A1 I t Q4 c?4.► iCR I T I CAI.. SUI't 14 f3 ���i4�•/F��iF�i*iF�t +� K{f w i r ♦i�y . i�+, M iFi�#iF�r•i4 1► I-ANE (IEHI'lI=TF, r' t NORTHEIOLIND SOUTHHC)U1IC, FASI 40UND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MQk.' wIi)TH 110V WIDTH MOV WIDTH — 1 RT. 10.0 RT, 14. RTL 14.0 RT. 10.0 2 T.. 1:.0 T.. 12.0 ... .... LT. 10.0 3 1'.. 14.!1 l_.. l0.f> ... .... L. 10.0 _ — 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... - 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... - TRAFFIC VOLI.IMES - _ NORTHBOUND SOLITHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 201 120 25 91 -- THRU 1924 1171 99 96 - p RIGHT 85 35 35 150 - TRUCKS W LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR -- = NORTHBOUND 1 0 .95 -_ SOUTHBOUND 3 0 .95 EASTBOUND 1 0 .95 WESTBOUND 3 O .95 PHASING N/S :4. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) E/W :5. DIRECTIO14 SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2. 100 — 599 (#PEDS/HR) — CYCLE LENGTH 105 SECOND CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUNU EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 1129 620 135 126 LEFT 167 97 O 0 NORTHBOUND SORTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND _- INPUT VOLUME 201 120 25 91 ADJUSTED VOL 186 97 0 64 CAPACITY 687 O O 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A LANE 1 2 3 4 5 b FV!FiFPU3FRTOct 1 T QIV F1FEE SIFiAFit'F-4 CENTE'FAZ -1 r-_ ME[NJ -F eaMt-NL_YS 3 53 Nt= 1 A�lF= / t "f:7I-f F:r-NMF=" O(,, F FIi 1 of 'POVFI) f't9 L.EVFI. (JI- '�Ef•�'IC'f- 1= SAIUF:ATI(IN 1Q1 CR I T IC A I N 'J01 t3 t3 7 GRI-TICAI `.�(wi L-412e� *•r***++1*++++t+*++�*•*•**** LANE GE(It•lf_ I F' r NORTHBOUND SOUTHbUIfTJp EAS MOUND WESTBOUND MOV WIDTH MOV WID1H MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 7.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... R.. 12.0 1'.. 12.G ... .... ... T.. 12.0 L. 12.0 ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOI. UMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 747 THRU 860 0 0 0 0 O 720 - = RIGHT 0 0 0 22 TRUCES (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 12 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 24 0 .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 532 0 0 939 LEFT 887 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 747 0 0 0 ADJUSTED VOL 887 0 0 0 CAPACITY 687 0 0 0 e _ A Mr)VEt•IC:NT N/F, lrt �,"►1. f - Sfi-849' f rtRNrA"E3F=•(7F Z_V44_F I F3" RFEE SI=AF=;ZU--" CENTER f :F; T T" T Clno1 M "_ Vi--MI= h.!-T Ono hl#LN1__ YS I V3 1 A%,o i T '`_-, ClI__,T_I-4 i=�A1-11=" T)ATF: F't 1 l PM 1. E-VFI. OF F)EFf-:MICE I7 SAT IjRfAl T ( 114 70 C R T T T C i)L 1 1 %T11 F -.1-D :? C: I . -t'lL + ) CRITIC'Al '31.11.1 T 4(,1.,-' LANE GL-O •tETRY NORTHBCIL114D SUIT THDOI H,I1) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MO%I WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 T.. 11.C► ... .... ... .... T.. 12.0 2 T.. 11.0 ... .... ... .... T.. 12.0 3 T.. 11.0 ... .... ... .... .. 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ..,. 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT Ci O 0 0 THRU 1578 0 0 1051 RIGHT 0 0 0 0 TRUCk:S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 12 C► .95 SORTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 0 i► 1 WESTBOUND 24 0 .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SORTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 682 0 0 720 LEFT 0 0 0 0 NUKlHbUUNV 5OUTHHUUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME O 0 0 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 0 0 CAPACITY 687 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A '1"RANSF nFz'TAT I nM RFr3FE=ARC.:.IH CENTEF� CR T T T GFNI,_ M(73R%.PF MF= h! V Ahl(�1_ ` E3 I S NF ' A',!F F=•''TF--f F?AME_> PAT F PH ] AF'F'f:F lYF= h PM I.EVE L. OF ;�FF:VTC'E A SAT 11RA1 T FIN 34 CR I T I ('A(_ N ' VOI _`` <:' CF; T T T C►;I ;�t.11l f---=, ] rT LANE: (�c7OHF T F_,''r NORTHBOUND SOUTHE<OUND E_AS T BOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 ... .... T.. 12.R.. 12.0 ... .... 2 ... .... LT. 12.0 T.. 12.0 3 ... .... ... .... ... .... 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 1 0 O THRU 0 389 359 0 RIGHT 0 0 311 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (I#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 .95 EASTBOUND 3 0 .95 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 0 225 389 0 LEFT 0 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 1 O 0 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 0 0 CAPACITY 687 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A i'rtAFV!aF*"1F; -I-AT I C]M FRFEE: SEAF'CF-♦ CENTER CF:Z T T' 11^AL_. Mf7V[=MEFNIT ANFAL_.Y13 I S f V E A %J' E: / T c? �5 '=3 F=l ! _ f "T F-4 F=< A M F= ' • DATE FH 1 AFI 'f-10YE D F='M LEVEL OF clf::r-:''.'IcE SAI U RAT ION 31 CR 1 T I co rd .'CAL CFR1 TI('i:1_ F 'W WW1 :'. 1? t CRI (I(.,k- SUN rC LANE GE(?MF TF:Y NCRTHBOUND SOUTHPO(_1ND EA�;TR IJND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH i... .... T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ... .... 2 ... .... T.. 12.0 .... ... —e_ 3 ... .... L.T. 12.0 ... .... .... ... .... 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... . 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... _ 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND ' LEFT 0 THRU O 50 O 640 266 O O -- a RIGHT O 0 D O TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND O 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 .95 EASTBOUND 4 O .95 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 (#BEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND - THRU -RIGHT O 267 291 O LEFT 0 0 O O - NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 50 O O ADJUSTED VOL 0 23 O O CAPACITY 687 O O O -_ MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A • 8E-8�9� 1 -rF-ZHrtv_-3t`'"F -r44-rr C;N t=ZFEE SEoAF:R(I- cFr�t-r�tZ t;R I _r T Cfc�tL MC7vE=:ME__rq T" ANO!I-`-►I-.._YC-3 T S 13 I E3 AYIVE F=-ft-. 0 / I DAi L F H 1 /?F f FF(1:'E.I) F,I I LEVEL (If ;E=F:':'ICF SAT I I t itl CRITTCr11 tJ; f v'tll S -t C-t CRTTICAt_ 5LIt•1 1. 1. LANE GFOt1E_ T F:'r' NORTHBOUND S01RHHOUND (:ASTF+OUNU WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 R .. 12.0 T.. 1 2 . Cl F:.. 12.0 ... ... . 2 T.. 12.0 T.. 14 Q L.. 12.C► .. ... .. 3 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.12.0 ... .... 4 T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... ... .... S... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT U 0 635 0 THRU 1999 1:338 U 0 RIGHT 564 0 45 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 .95 EASTBOUND 5 0 .99 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 " PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 810 542 0 0 LEFT 0 U 353 p NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 0 635 p ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 673 0 CAPACITY 268 0 0 O MOVEMENT OK OK N/A N/A " • •' • "f'RAhlSF'C'3R"TAT I Clh! REST= AF�[�h-# C!`hITER GR I _r I Crat__ MClt1E=:ME-:hl.i_ �hl�a1_...YS I. S F_� I c�(:�1YtVE Cat_ �lt� / 7 _��".`, F�:ist"!1=' Di11 L f='Ei 1 i��F='F'F'[7VEL� F'i•1 I_F VE'L (�F SE. F:'.' 1 C F B SAT E It�;�aT l or J (�� CRITICf,I hl ��, �,'nt i� _t c-� ' CR I I I CAI. SIJhI T_ I h -�ti LANE GE.(�hlE_ T I?'r' NORTHt+OUNri SOIJTHNC�UIJn rASTF+OIJNI) WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH Mov wInTH MOU WIDTH MOV WIDTH 2 T.. 12. t:► T.. 1 � ►► L.. 12. �:► • • • w • • 3 T.. 12.0 T.. i�.�:� L.. 12.i� ... .... 4 T.. 12.�► ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... b... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFF 7 C VOl_llMEa NORTHBOl.1ND SORTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT O 4 6�•5 O THRU 1999 1.3L�8 �► Q z.: � RIGHT 564 C► 45 O �� TRUCk:S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/Hk) PEAk° HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 U .95 SOUTHBOLIND 5 0 .95 • EASTBOUND 5 i► .99 . WESTBOUND 0 c� i PHASING N/S :i. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. �) - 99 (#F'EDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 12U SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES E+Y MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTIiPOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 81U 542 D p LEFT O � C► 353 Q . NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTB0UND INPUT VOLUME C� Q b35 p ADJUSTED VOL �� C► 67� p N CAPACITY 268 0 p p MOVEMENT Ok; Ok; N/A N/A • •� 1 "RAN4�t�C1RTAT I rJM F=;FS=;EARCH CENTEM CR I T I Cfal.__ Mf ?�,/ F= MU:f "-V ANAL...YS Z S N F= 1 Fa t:' I / I�,1 F= E7 S T DATI I'H I (AP(A='f VE1) F'Fl L.EVEI - OF ''E`RV I CE D SHTURo')T I PH 83 CR I T T CAI fd !� '•JO1.. - 4- C;:I t :. : _ i c Vs s• • CR I T I Co, l IM 1 r C_) LANE (W 01.1ET I=;Y NORTHBOUND SOUTHDOIIND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WTDTII MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH I T.. 11.0 ... .... ... .... RT. 14.0 2 T.. 11.0 ... .... ... .... T.. 12.0 3 LT. 12.0 ... .... ... .... ... .... 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 111 0 O 0 THRU 1031 0 O 624 RIGHT 0 0 0 1498 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 4 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 0 to 1 WESTBOUND 4 0 .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEFERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. . 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH i C►0 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 442 0 0 1060 LEFT C► C► 0 O NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME ill 0 O O ADJUSTED VOL 86 0 0 O CAPACITY 312 O 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A C`fi�i�NS�'Qt�TA T-ION F'cE �SFA�r�'H CENT/= F2 CFR I T I C.:A1 t-r1F--titL. 1r'�._►- I E3 i DA1 C 1'N 1 ,PF'( f_1VE 1) F'hi I L E"VLi. OF `SE I,-V I C.E yy` ( SA1 l IkAT ION 41 I CR 11 .1 CAI _ N /!. VOL —1 fi' C3 f CF i T T (-r-t - CRTTTCFu.iRt 74 _l rii#*0xii��i*�if�if�F�1�#�1�if LANE GEOr•if- I r:'r i NORTHBOUND SOU T HDOI lNh EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH RT. 18.0 2 T.. 1'2 0 ... T.. 12.0 12.0 ... .... ... .... ... .... —= 4 I..T . 12. f.i ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 . . . . . . . ... .... ... .... . .. ... . 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES —— _ NORTHBOUND SOUTHHOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 57 0 C► THRU 1002 0 0 621 RIGHT 0 O 0 240 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 0 .95 SORTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND O 0 1 WESTBOUND 5 0 .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 — 99 (#PEAS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 10() SECONDS _ CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHEOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 298 U 0 443 LEFT 0 0 0 O NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 57 O O O - ADJUSTED VOL 23 0 O 0 _ CAPACITY 312 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A N111 E3 F=' "_ t;;! I - e--N _V 1 "_ P4 F;7 FE 8F= fcN tz; C--- t-i C:: F-= P4 -r I=- F;t m I -V I (-.:: n t- 1-1 (3 %,..P FEE M F=_ 1'4'1 AP4emki- VS I E3 D(i I I Fll I Pt-1 I EVE. -I. SAT( IFI'i4l 1 t )l 1 37 CR. I T I Ci, I (l CR I T r if "I If 1 LAIA-, GIA-11-l! ff-'l NORTHBOUND S 0 1.1 T I i U EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH I... RT. j T.. 17.0 2 12.0 T.. 10.0 3 12. 0 L.. 10.0 4 T . 12. 0 0 . . . . . . . . .. 5 .... vap .0aw TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 0 0 339 THRU 0 6 3 2 C) 327 RIGHT 0 60 0 0 TRUCKS M LOCAL. BUSES (#/HR) PEAk'..' HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 1c) I SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .8 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 2 .75 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEFERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : I . () -- 99 (#F-*EDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANF VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 0 27.8 0 210 LEFT 0 LEFT TUiNN C:HEa,' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 0 0 339 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 0 432 CAPACITY 0 485 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A hi/A Wo-IM- - 77 =.1 'T'RAMSF=""R-TA'T' I C7N t=;:E'SE:ARC V4 CENTER > Q CR I T I C:AI-_. t`iCIVEV MF:ht -F ANA!__YS I S :;, E-• I SC:AYt�JE _ DAT F PH 1 i4FF'k(i'•J[: 11 F'M LEVEL OF SEFAI I (' E U SAI UR(AT I CRJ $0 CRITICAL N/S VOL 1 -► 1 ..� - CRTTTf'f.I- F ,;,( ni - CR I i [flail . �,I li I 1 =_ . t� Al. LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOIJTHPOL1141) EAST liOuND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH _ - 1 RT. 2(l, r► T.. 1- RT. 12. �► ... ... . 2 T.. 1,'.0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ... .... -- 3 T.. 12.4,-► T. 12.0 LT. 12.0 ... .... -- 4 T.. 12.T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ... .... 5 ... .... L.. 12.Q ... .... ... .... = 6 ... .... L. - 12.0 ... .... ... ... . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND C LEFT 0119 341 O THRU 1930 1520 828 O -� RIGHT 104 0 128 0 - TRUCKS (Y.) LOCAL FUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR =_ NORTHBOUND 5 0 •95 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 .96 EASTBOUND 5 0 •95 _ WESTBOUND 0 0 1 -"' PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS CRITICAL_ LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND - THRU -RIGHT 553 457 379 O .` LEFT 0 49 0 O NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 119 341 O ADJUSTED VOL 0 95 353 O CAPACITY 312 0 0 O MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A Y Ys .' : .n C Fi: I `1` T f(-1 i _ t-I C7 �! F: h'1 IF h*l 1- A ttit Oct 1 1r S 1. s j UATF f'li 1 I'M C11: I 1 I CNI L_ 't4 '101 Ai .1 CF: T r f f:i-il �;l It i f_I 1 .' . l._HNE 5E=C11 IF T P*v NORTHBOUND SOU 1 HBOUI.1D EASTriou f) WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH i... .... T.. 14. i+ RT•. 11.0 ... .... 1 ... .... T.. 13. T.. 12. (-,... ... . _ a 3 ... .... i_T. 1 1 . C+ T.. 12.0 ... ... . -sue 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... _ -» NORTHBOUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 393 0 0 THRU C+ 584 791 0 RIGHT 0 0 232 0 TRUCES M LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND O C+ t SOUTHBOUND It 0 .95 EASTBOUND 2 0 .95 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 2. JoO - 599 (#P D /HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL. LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND -- THRU -RIGHT U 398 415 0 LEFT r i r LEFT TURN CHECK: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND ' INPUT VOL_11ME 0 ADJUSTED VOL. 0 393 0 0 445 0 O = CAPAG 11 Y 0 485 0 0 lr Pe A m!s r--,, c3 F:;: -I r-A -T, I (-j M F;, I F:- e-N F_(-- " (7: F_�_ M -r I=— F:;Z c__ r---c 1 1 J. C.: I m "_ Illy I ____ m V_ P4 v fmkme41... %eE3 1 C3 m DATE PH I o'IF'F1-11VELP I-'M L EvEl OF k'! 1 46 • CRlTl('()l F-11 '.'(11 -4 q') CFATICi,l �;I.ltl F-4 1 NORTHROIJ14D EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV t Jlf.,IH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH I RT. 11.0 ... .... T.. 11.0 2 T.. 11. T.. 11.0 3 T.. I I . ... .... LT. 11.0 4 ... ..o. ... .... 5 .... ... .... 6 ... ... .... ... NORTHBOUND TRAFFIC V01.11MES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 315 0 THRU 911 0 762 0 RIGHT 147 0 cl 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND I cl .95 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND I cl .95 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 (OPEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 407 O 408 0 LEFT 0 0 LEF. NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 0 315 0 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 311 0 CAPACITY 0 485 0 0 ri MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A 7 ,77r 1 4 `1"RANSP'CyiF2TAT I C7hl RE SF 0kF=tCENTER _ CR T 1` T C;AI._ M(-IVE'ME.hIT AhlA1."_YS I �+ m MI"M T rAVU- /IV r75 IF • [)(AT 1- f--`H PM *44 LE VEI_ O(= SAT URA1 I (IN 23 I CRITJ('_Af rJ% '• 01 4`7�'3 3 CPITrrFa I i • LANE Gf--: CjI.1(= I 1;:1' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDIFi MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 ... .... T.. II.KT. 11.0 ... .... 2 ... .... 1'.. 11.0 T.. 11.0 ... .... — _ 3 ... .... LT. 12.0 T.. 11.0 ... .... 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... _ 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... --- 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VO! _UMES — NORTHBOIJ14D SDUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 87 O 0 /^ THRU 0 206 740 0 RIGHT 0 0 68 0 =. TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 .95 EASTBOUND 0 0 .95 —1� WESTBOUND 1 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION - - PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECO14DS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT C► 98 309 O LEFT 0 0 0 0 NORTHdC;u(FD SOU T HBOUND EAS i 1:40UND Wf*ST$pU(Jv INPUT VOLUME 0 87 0 0 _-- ADJUSTED VOL. 56 O 0 CAPACITY 312 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A o o=tm 3F=-CJFcTAT I C)n1 F:;:Fsr--okr:z CrmTEF+t t-_ F: T -T T C : /-N I. _. t"I ...T- A P4 A I _-- N' c3 T S D01F 1-1i l /iV'FJIA)VELY F'M 2 �'.,. ifs(MiF�if�tt}.I.xt#t♦ct}�+r+►a:�t�*�����*� LE VEI_ Of- St ' SAT IJR(0I(114 23 CR I T I N r'-, V01 `7 (:-3 I cR 1 1 :I.11i It 11.1 LANI_ hC- 01.11= 1 k'r NORTHBOUNI S0IITHP1jL1N11 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH mov WIriIH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH ... .... T.. 11.0 RT. 11.0 ... .... _ 2 ... .... T.. 11.0 T.. 11.0 ... .... 3 ... .... LT. 12.0 T.. 11.0 ... .... 4 ... .... ... .... .., ..,. ... .... g... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... e 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES — = NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT O 87 0 0 -�_ THRU 0 206 740 0 R I GHT 0 0 68 0 'RUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAS; HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 .95 - EASTSOU14D 0 0 .95 -- WESTBOUND 1 0 1 -= PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION _ E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 0 98 309 0 LEFT 0 0 O 0 - F LE - T NORTHBGL ID SOUTHSOUND EAST"LjOUidU WESTBpi. Nb INPUT VOLUME 0 87 O 0 ADJUSTED VOL Q 56 O q t �a CAPACITY 312 0 O O MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 86 J' IrmAmc.3v- nF<TAT I CJIV tRESFAF c:" CENTER CR I I- I CAI_ m " w r-_=- t1i t7_7 INt-I ANr-N1 _YS I S IVW ti-F Dr^, I F F'14 1 i-`,f41,0vE D Fill LEVEL OF F) SA T I IN i •_;r' CRITI(_i;i U11 1 1►i4�F1�1Et#�t*+ h ►+++�tf++«aMf �i�iFiiiE NORTHE4001 P S01JTI1DUUM, E ASII"sOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDIII MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 12. RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 2 L. 12.0 L.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 3 ... .... ... .... ... .... L.. 12.0 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VULUMFS NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 187 16 93 95 THRU 336 15:., 149 682 RIGHT 73 20 41 87 TRUCKS (Y.) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 2 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 3 0 .95 EASTBOUND 3 0 .95 WESTBOUND 1 0 .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERAlION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2. 100 - 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 457 192 216 438 LEFT 170 0 64 65 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 187 16 93 95 ADJUSTED VOL. 170 0 64 65 CAPACITY 312 0 0 0 MOVEMENT NIA N/A N/A N/A c� RAhISI-C)kTA T 117114 V< SEf:NRCiH C :EhJTE1Z CR T I' I CAI._. M(.:I%�,' =ME"-F AMAI._ vl__3 I S C� T C Fa Y thl F: E4 i 1 S "T • i)i'T7F- F'F-i 1 Af-'F-•F:'OV(=1► F'M l_l_VFI 01 51_I'AlluE la SA I I INNT I ai CRITICFBI IJ V01 7;_"_ • (:RIIICAL ';I1iI� rt=r I_AIJL- GLOhiF T F�'� NORTHBOUND St)(1THLARY-11) E►;STRot IND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIT)TH NOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 T.. 12.<_► P.. 1-.!► ... .... T.. 12.0 2 T.. 12.( T.. 12. C.) ... .... L.. 12.0 3 T.. 12.Q T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... 4 L.. 12.0 1.. 12.1) ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC; VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 117 0 0 67 THRU 1789 1519 0 68 RIGHT 0 253 0 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 .95 EASTBOUND 5 0 1 WESTBOUND 5 0 .95 PHASING N/S :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 2. 10() — 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYC" E LENGTH 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 725 615 0 75 LEFT 94 0 0 35 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 117 0 0 67 ADJUSTED VOL 94 0 4.) 35 a` CAPACITY 110 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A OK N/A N/A 86-84 'r F:;Z A " S; F- M F;;: -V ocl 7- 1 " " 1=;Z e7'_--3 e: P4 Fzc (-- " (_— E-7 P4 _r 0: F.;t C-_ F:;Z I -r 1 CAI- M (.-I %.,EF M F=__ INI _r A Fq A L.- N' fS 1 T-23 m t-1 I "I "l I e-N %11 f7:_ I/ P4 I C,-:; _T_ I) () T F f-"lq I AFF'F,'0VEl) PM LEVEL nf- SAI IJF:iij 1 30 Ck'ITICAl 14,5 VD. 7. .- e-. _.Al _N CRJfIC __ E,*I,l V( -(7? 4 4 CRITTCAI . SUN !7F �'_. 6:0 LANE GFUMETRi NORTHBOUND SOUTHR(IUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH I... .... RT. 10. 'cl T.. 11.0 2 ... .... T.. 10.0 .... LT. 11.0 3 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 4 .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 .... ... .... .... ... .... 6 .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 0 0 127 THRU 0 300 0 421 RIGHT 0 90 0 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 .95 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 5 0 .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2. 100 - 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 0 236 0 300 LEFT 0 U 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 0 0 127 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 0 112 CAPACITY 148 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A M Omk M i3 F> FZ -r t-N -1 1 CItV F:�Z F E3 FT 4N r-c 17, CEtVT1ER t7- t:;z i r r c, v. e4 m ci w il- ,i m F= t, - r -41 VcN IN4 0- — `e E3 I ES 1)1­1 T F FIA I PM LEVEI OF SST I IF."Al I( 1H 50 CPTTIFAl. 1-1/5 Vni lw� til CPT T I CAt I ft-1 LoNE GEOFIVIF,l NORTHROUNro 50 1) 11 q P () 1.1 N 1) EAS T 103LIND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDIH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 T.. 10. Q R.. 15. Q R.. 12.0 2 L.. 1 C). T.. 12. cl ... .... T.. 12.0 3 LT. 12.0 4 6 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 86 0 0 144 THRU 557 282 0 434 RIGHT 0 134 0 42 TRUCF.*S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 2 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 3 0 .95 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 1 0 .95 PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATIDN PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2. 100 — 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND —RIGHT THRU 598 305 0 302 LEFT 30 cl 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 86 0 0 144 ADJUSTED VOL 30 0 0 120 CAPACITY 293 0 0 0 MOVEMENT oil: OK NIA N/A ANSF lo- v.<TA`T' I "m Ft[=.SElaF;.u-,H CEIV7'ER I" tr._1vU-7 rtt=_r�t.�. Atvr-Ni__ YS3 i !E3 W r' O ►N I_ ✓ F- I F' l:3I_ F _ Fes' -T- D(i I F I'll I i)PPROVE Ji F'M l_FL'El F�F= F=It'.'ILF C." S/a1111:01 11114 % 1 I.A►JE 6E11Mi'TF-'r NORTHBOUND 3011 TI114011N1) EASTDOLIND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH 1`10V WIDTH MOV WIDT14 MOV WIDTH 1 T. 10.RT. 14.0 R.. 10.O RT. 10.0 2 L. 11.L.. 11.0 L.. 12.0 3 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 199 0 76 90 THRU 387, 289 0 458 RIGHT O 46 108 107 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND i 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .95 EASTBOUND 2 0 .95 WESTBOUND 0 0 .98 PHASING N/S :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W :3. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (NO OVERLAP) PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2. 100 - 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS I CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 407 334 u 603 LEFT 161 0 45 57 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 199 0 76 90 ADJUSTED VOL i81 O 45 57 .' CAPACITY 73 108 0 611 MOVEMENT N/A OK N/A N/A 1'�tAtVSF"t'JF?"TA'T 'T 111V F;�ESF eAFR CENTER CFI I _r T C :Al • I S v PAT F PH 1 of 'Fr-'('vF t) FM LE:'VE(. PF '-lEFA' I CE r�o. SA11.11-;AT 1 OH 32 CR 11 I ('ial_ H %S; ':'Of I • CFI I T I Ciil _ 51 It-1 -T U:3 I_ANk GLOr•1F ffh''r NORTHBOUND S0LJTI4RO(.JN1-i EAS TROUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 11.0 ... .... T.. 12.c► ... .... 2 T.. 11.0 ... .... T.. 12.0 ... .... 3 T.. ll.() ... .... LT. 12.0 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .•.. ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT C1 0 304 0 THRU 275 0 706 0 RIGHT 166 0 0 0 TRUCES ! %) LOCAL BUSES (it/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 6 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 5 0 .95 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHASING N/S :Fs. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :`,. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2. 100 — 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 1139 0 389 0 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 0 304 0 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 311 .0 CAPACITY 50 174 0 611 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A , N/A •! to M*41WO 4 f lrl:;to=tims;F:,cis<-ron*-r j: m m F:7F=v.3E7ptF:;:r—_" c_—R:r4-rF_=F:z CFI I T I r—' f tA I M M %ws = M F---- r-,l -I- A M #!�% I — %e f3 3C S; tE; w i2 #!:-N q%/ F_ z ! -3 w I fm -3 -1 Lr'VP-1 Df- 51:FlAll(_[*_'. SAT' 1W IT 1 54 CPT'l CRITICAI F.-I-) 11,. LANE (A__-0t-1f- T F-`t NORTHBOUND 'SlOU T I APOt IND f A Sl f.4 I U N 1) WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDT14 MOV WIDTH MOV w I T)TH MOV WIDTH I RT. 12.0 LT. I I . tj R.. I I . 2 T.. 11.0 L. cl. (.) T.. 11.0 3 T.. 11.0 ... 4 .... ... .... L.. 13.0 5 .0. .... ... .... 6 .... ... .... ... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 278 178 0 THRU 411 7,26 507 0 RIGHT 147 0 61 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 3 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 4 0 .95 EASTBOUND 0 0 .9.5 WESTBOUND 2 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2. 100 — 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRUI —RIGHT 333 327, 280 0 LEFT 0 cl 140 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 278 178 0 ADJUSTED VOL 0 278 156 0 CAPACITY 50 174 0 611 MOVEMENT N/A NIA N/A NIA c I M °fit= ANSPQF�TAT I f�IV F;:;:EF3t- Oct F<f—_ f_.'ENTEFz rl:R T T T CAI -. rl(-IMF FBI r Ah1A1-_ YS t S UAT F" PH 1 (AF'FRCIVE D PM LEVEL (1F ', EF-:VFC.E C SATHf-AT TON 75 CR I T I cAl. Fq VC1I CR FT I , LANE (_�F-Clr•1E I[.:', NORTHBOUND SOUTHE1014,11, EAS I POUND WESTBOUND LANE: MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 ... .... R .. 1 1 .1-1 ... .... T. . 10.0 2 ... .... T.. II.o ... .... LT. 10.0 3 ... T.. 1 1 .0 ... L.. 1 O. i_l 4 .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT ► 0 0 2060 THRU 0 694 0 348 RIGHT 0 133, 0 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 1 0 •95 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 0 0 .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 0 387 0 910 LEFT 0 6 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 0 0 2060 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 0 2237 CAPACITY 50 174 0 611 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A SG--84S - I C4, V� E: ig F= r-N F:;: I _: - 7- 1— -r C = P4 u F:z I _r T 1-1 (7) ql/ r- t-1 I=-,- t\l I fl-N rl%f f- v S; I E3 I fA I I I ILE- / !73 • Fri i T E Ili I r NF'l, V I--,- D PM 74 .3 CRI FIFAl. SIAN 1 7 C *4 41 L v;l 41 GE (311 1 F, NORTHBOUND S0llTliPn(JNr) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH I T.. 10. 0 T.. I RT. 11.0 2 L.. 10. ct ... LT. 11.0 4 5 6 .... ... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 310 0 0 150 THRU 166 195 0 1196 RIGHT 0 0 0 27 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 3 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 3 0 .95 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 1 0 .95 PHASING N/S :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2. 100 - 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 179 211 0 748 LEFT 311 0 0 LEFT TUR14 CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 310 0 0 iso ADJUSTED VOL 311 0 0 127 CAPACITY 0 343 0 611 MOVEMENT N/A DK N/A N/A Year 1981 1981 1983 1983 1983 1984 1 15151 DOWNTOWN DRI CALCULATION OF PM PEAK HOUR DIRECTIONAL SPLITS PM Peak Hour Coun+ T ftt' + ,o . _1.on -t Out T1) _11 Brickell/14th St. 468 1,304 1,772 352 1,339 •1,691 B-ickell/13th St. 704 2,039 2,743 541 1,452 1,993 Brickell/15th Rd. 369 1,448 1,S17 420 1,500 1,920 Miami Ave/15th Rd. 131 514 645 172 896 1,068 Coral Way/3rd Ave. 486 1,488 1,974 488 11386 1j,874 Biscayne Blvd./I-395 1,041 2,023 3,064 .1 �061 6, Z33 1,830 7� 2,891 '23,4524 ,9 26.6% 73.45% 'U Grand Totals 60233 178219 23,452 :f, 10,340 24,955 35,295 7,753 74 3Z6 16,706 58F880 24,459 29.2% 70.8% USE 30% 70% • Sfi ;. #5151 DOWNTOWN DRI CALCULATION OF P.M. PEAK HOUR DIRECTIONAL SPLITS PM Peak Hour Year Co,-,r.* ' oca* -cn In O .t Total 1995/1986 1395/N.E•. 2nd & 1st Aves. 1,354 3,803 5,157 1986 S.W. 3rd Ave./15 Rd./13st 486 1,277 1,763 445 1,193 1,638 1986 Brickell/15th Rd. 377 1,446 10823 333 1,579 1,912 1986 Brickell/13th St. 545 1,850 20395 681 1,637 2,318 1986 Miami Ave./15th Rd. 213 495 708 152 953 1,105 1986 N.W. 2nd Ave./3rd St. 248 821 10069 206 835 10041 1986 Flagler/W. 2nd Ave. 152 539 691 1986 N.W. 3 Ct/3rd Ave./6th St 809 1,904 2,713 1986 N.W. 1 Ave/14th St. 57 91 148 81 93 174 1986 Biscayne Blvd./N.E. 19th St. 1,031 1,500 2,531 1,033 1,644 2,677 1986 Biscayne Blvd./N.E. 15th St. 1,093 10681 2,774 • 1 044 1,614 2 658 1 ,340 24,955 355 29.3% 70.7% V . 9/9/86 DOWNTOWN DRI CALCULATION OF A.M. PEAR HOUR DIRECTIONAL SPLITS AM Peak Hour wear C: rare. 1964 Biscayne Blvd./I 395 2,335 1,426 807 841 3,142 20,267 1981 Brickell/14th St. 1,280 1,147 423 671 1,703 1,818 1983 Brickell/13th St. 1,125 1,476 577 683 1,702 2,159 1983 Brickell/15th Rd. 1,343 365 309 1,708 1,621 1,312 1984 S. Miami Ave./E of 15 Rd. 791 146 82 937 799 717 �.{. 1983 Coral Way/3 Ave. 2,485 895 �- 3,380 Sub Total 15,437 5,799 21,236 72.74 27.3% 12,899 6,330 19,229 Totals 8,932 20902 11,834 8,345 30682 128027 5,467 1,919 7,386 15,437 5,_ 799 21,,236 Grand Total 51,080 20,632 71,712 71.2% 28.8% USE 70% 308 •a ti. RNM DOWNTOWN DRI CALCULATION OF AM PEAK HOUR Daily Year Count Location 2-Way In Out Tota: 1986 Downtown Distributor 47,514 -4,285 679 4,96- 1986 Biscayne Blvd. (4th-5th Sts.) 33,642 1,458 817 2,27` 1986 N.E. 2 Ave. (4th-5th Sts.) 17,167 1,252 386 1,63, 1986 N.W. 1 Ave. (4th-5th Sts.) 2,531 205 49 25- 1986 N.W. 3 St. (E. of 2nd Ave.) 8,046 395 208 60- 1986 N.W. 1 St., Flagler, S.W. 1st. 21,305 1,140 590 10,73( 1986 S.W. 2nd + 3rd Sts. 6,350 197 173 _371 Sub Total 136,555 81932 2,902 11,83 75.5% 24.5% 8.67 1984 Brickell Ave. @ 12th St. 26,306 1,156 779 1,93 1984 Brickell Ave. @ 19th St. 21,518 1,253 436 1,68 • 1984 7th & 8th Sts. (E. of Miami) 19,492 1,567 460 2,02 1984 7th & 8th Sts. (W. of Miami) 22,364 1,682 493 2,17 1984 Miaibi Ave. @ S. 18 St. 51,489 298 147 44 1984 Miami Ave. @ S. 10 St. 7,385 641 200 84 1983 Miami Ave. @ S. 17 Rd. 80154 233 129 36 1985 Biscayne Blvd. & N.E. 8th St. 37,859 11515 1,038 2155 Sub Total 148,567 8,345 3,682 12,0 69.4% 30.6% 8.1% . �.� Total 285 122 , 17 277 . 6,584 6 23, 8( 72.4% 27.6% 8.3: 9/9/86 DOWNTOWN DRI CALCULATION OF A.M. PEAK HOUR DIRECTIONAL SPLITS • �M Da.gi� T]A�r Year Count location In out Total 1986 Brickell/7/8th St. 6,026 41482 10,508 1986 S. Miami/7/8th St. 922 240 1,162 1,126 195 1,321 1986 S.W. 4th Ave/7/8th St. 1,338 337 1,675 2,083 251 2,334 1986 S.W. 7th St./2/3 Ave. 1,404 82S 2,229 12,899 6,330 19,229 67.1% 32.9% 1985/1986 1395/N.E. 2nd i 1st Aves. 3,393 1,321 4,714 1986 N.W. 3rd Ct./3rd. Ave./6 St. 2,074 598 2 ,672 Sub Total 5,467 10,919 7,386 74% 26% I t j DOWNTOWN DRI CALCULATION OF PM PEAR HOUR i PM Peak Year Count Location ADT In Out Total 1986 Downtown Distributor 47,514 1,013 21784 3,797 1986 Biscayne Blvd. (4th - _:h Sts.) 33,642 1,047 1,673 2,720 1986 N.E. 1st & 2nd Aves. (4th - 5th Sts.) 17,167 679 1,022 1,701 1996 N.W. 1st Ave. (4th - 5th Sts.) 2,531 83 117 200 1986 N.W. 3rd St. (E of 2nd Ave.) 8,046 91 607 898 - 1986 N.W. 1st, Flagler, S.W. 1st St. 21,305 707 1,015 11722 1986 S.W. 2nd & 3rd Streets �63..5�0. 57 474 531 ! Sub Total 136,5553,977 7,892— 11,50 31.8% 68.2% 8.47% 1984 Brickell Ave. @ 12th St 26,306 765 11801 21566 -'� 1984 Brickell Ave. @ 19th St. 21,518 515 1,464 1,979 -j. 1984 7th & 8th Sts (E of Miami) 19,492 590 937 1,527 1984 7th & 8th Sts (W of Miami) 22,364 653 1,080 1,733 1984 Miami Ave. @ S. 18th St. 5,489 271 266 537 == 1984 Miami Ave. @ S. loth St. 7,385 144 782 926 1983 Miami Ave. @ S. 17th St. 8,154 216 858 11074 1985 Biscayne Blvd. @ N.E. 8th St. 37,88599 922 .1�.�622.6�. 2 548 Sub Total 1451567 4,0795,814 3� 31.6% 68.4% 8.68% Total 285*122 7,753 16,706 24,459 31.7% 68.3% 8.58% USE 30% 70% 8 F . LANE 1 2 4 5 b i' FRoc%IgtS1='C7Fi T-!� l' 111h1 FiF= SE: eaV<C'1-4 GE1V'7 E� l.7l-� i -1" 7 1.:e-a1 1-11�1VE:.[`Fl 1+lT Ate!/='►1 _ Y ET. S DA T E PH I AF•F •kFiVr= L, NM I T IC'Al. Id: '01 1 1 ':-s .1 LN I I I t.'AI I, 1,4 '.'III 1 i'�#�Fi!-�t•*•�+�}a+}t to}i Txt � Y+tt}Yi }t x.t��i� I. ANr. Of TP , NORTHBOUND SOUTHI{UUP•11, MOV WIDTH MOB.' WIDTH RT. 12.0 R1'. 1.".1) T. 1.fJ T. T . . 12.'..' L.. 12.0 1_.. 12.0 ... .... TRAFFIC; VOLLIMFS EASTBOUND WESTBOUND MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH ... .... R.. 12.0 ... .... RT. 12.0 ... T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUNi.) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT (33 1 0 0 G THRI 1 1631 1-'91 0 245 R I RHT 94 320 0 37 TRUCKS t%) LOCAL_ BUSES (#/HR) PEAK. HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND i 0 .95 SOUTHBOU14D 1 0 .95 EASTBOUND 0 0 .95 WESTBOUND 0 0 .95 PHASING N/S :4. BOTH TUR14S PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) E/W :5. DIRECTION SEF'[-R#ITION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 2. 101", - 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 115 SECONDS CR 1 T I C(1L LANE= VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBC)UND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -P I GHT 677 .69 0 107 LEFT 469 0 . 0 LEFT TURN CHECK: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOU14D EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 831 0 0 0 ADJUSTED VOL 892 0 Q fi ph.ISF= CIF�TA-T' T C7N FRESEAFRU—" CENTER F ;Z T •T" t C A I. __ t` 11"] V U--_ 1`" t F• INI T" A h! FA I . _ Y S Iss P(21T f So I 1 lki�T I (1N 52 ('F: I 1 I Ci)l_ 1d t:; '.'nl. ..• <-i' 3 Cf-l;1 TIF:Al F-: (4 '.T11 el-�-1 <<-, CR 17 1("(Al 1 IM 1_ 4HE f�LFi191 T�' NORTHBOUND "I(1(11 f irl(tl (141) EAST BOUND WESTBOUND LAW. Mf IV W I D I H Ml '.' Ul I L) T H MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH IT. 12. .... Rl . 11. C► 2 T.. 12.<► ... .... ... .... T.. 11.0 3 I.T. 12.4 ... .... ... .... T.. 11.0 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOI. (JMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOI_!ND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 372 C► O 0 THRU 420 C► C) 1284 RIGHT 0 !_► U 3710 TRUCk;S (%) LOCAL 811SES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 3 Cl .95 SOUTHBOUND 0 ! 1 EASTBOUND 0 C► 1 WESTBOLIPID 1 0 .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 1�.'Ci SECONDS -CRITICAL L_ANF= VOl_ (.JMF :3 BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SORTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 296 C► u 646 LEFT 0 O LEFT TURN CHECK NU(i THDOUNQ SOLI fethtoul ID EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 372 O O O ADJUSTED VOL 389 0 0 O CAPACITY O 789 61 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 86-849" C-- F;;e T -t'- T C-7, i(-N t t-If" w I-=- [IJ -1, F�tl-J e-N L- **e E; I c-S 7 *4 1-*io-o *-P-4,-40 I VVEI Ill. !If SAI 62 I-R, I r f c i.I i i 1,!nI .I .-, (-J-A T I Al I- W 11 'i" 4 rRlTll-r;d- 'Alll • NORi,winurn) S01-1 I I lbol IND I F401 JNfj WESTBOUND LANE mov WIDIH 110t) W I MOV W?DTH MOV WIDTH I.. I 1 .0 RT. I J. ... .... Rr. 11.0 L.T. I I ... .... T. . 11. () . 0 . . LT. 11.0 4 ... .... 6 TRAFFIC VOLUMEF NORTH801-1141) 5011THBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 5: iC 1 155 THRU 409 645 138(.-) RIGHT 0 98 226 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEA(:: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 4 0 .95 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 5 .95 PHASIFIG N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 12, SECOND", CRITICAL LANE VOI (.11IFS BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHB01.1(41) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 237 424 0 690 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHROUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND TtIF'UT vnLt!!-F 52 0 155 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 145 CAPACITY 0 187 0 0 MOVEMENT OK OK N/A N/A I 86-84S," '`1"RANSF='t7r-.cTAT I "i-j F;zFESEAF=;cCI-1 CENTER CR IT I CAI __ MC-3 FEE MEr,47 ANAL_ YE3 I S 1)AI F FlA l VE- 1.) F'M (-EVE I (11= :;EF'V I C'E /-4 SA1 l (f'ii I I (III 34 CF'i1 ICAI. N/S 'JC11_ -":-:' C11:1 T I CAI E /14 VOL 03 1 CR I T I CAl_ SUM 4_3 1 LANE 6EOMEIRr NORTHBOUND SOUTHF+OUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MI)V WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 T.. ... .... ... .... RT. 11.0 2 L.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... T.. 11.C► 3 ... .... ... .... ... .... LT. 11.0 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... g. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 26 0 0 467 THRU 30 0 0 1063 RIGHT 0 0 0 13 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 3 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 0 C► 1 WESTBOUND 1 0 .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 — 9q (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL. LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 32 0 0 581 LEFT C► 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NCRTHBOUN D SOUTI (I?cuiz, EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 26 O 0 467 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 0 487 CAPACITY 0 356 0 O MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A s' � 'r AN�S1=•(71:; -TO-N''T- T (71`i t�ESFAFtiCI-1 (^ENF7 t"1 E: h•! -1 F\i 1._. Y S I C-3 1?i+Tl I'll I F;F1'F:(1'lEI) ('hl LEVEL Of- CF: I T I Cs-iI (d r' = YnI GF:IT I('Ai F,"W 'Ail Z t-)'i CR I T I (:;Al SI J11 ♦ �JF If�YY���MX}►'.��T+YYJsr�i 1Y �Y�Y�FIi�#}i iF TkA r 06 RAMP i(1llT(ii+(l(11JF Eti STFOUND WESTBOUND = LANE MOV W T DTH MO'.' W ] IJTH MMI WIDTH MOV WIDTH 16.... .... T.. 14.0 T.. 12. -:► T.. 12. C► ... .... LT. 11.0 T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... L.. 11.0 - 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOI._1 IME S NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUIJD EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT C► 0 O 547 _ THRU 1639 RIGHT 0 469 0 36 0 532 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND : 0 • 95 SOUTHBOUND 3 0 .95 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 0 •95 -_ PHASI146 N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRE(_TION SEPERATION - PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. G - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS = CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND - THRU -RIGHT 651 257 0 407 - LEFT i► 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 0 0 547 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 0 588 CAPACITY 0 221 O 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 8E-849►, I " Pki � E 45v' F_= F:;Z C— " C—_ r=— M _r 1= M F;;: I T 1(7� t n %�, v- m F_-_ m -ir omo m A i-. v iE3 T s; 1- A --- I I- 7M DA I L PH I (APPf"OVED PM L EVF I (IF- '4J_`! I f_F 1 1, 1 C I'l I I (-J I _7 .4 UR I T I C I ETRY ANE (. DMI: - N NORTHBOUND SOUT 14LAOI-IND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH Rl. 11.0 T.. 1 R.. 12.0 R.. 10.0 2 T.. 11.4) T.. 12. T.. 12. 0 RL. 11.0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 10.0 4 ... L.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ... 5 L_.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHSOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 110 413 472 THRU 1200 1210 354 0 RIGHT 136 0 378 792 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 1 0 .95 EASTBOUND 1 0 .95 WESTBOUND 4 0 .95 PHASING N/S :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W* :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 2. 100 — 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 115 SECONDS CRi'rICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 527 471 197 0 LEFT 0 45 223 531 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 110 413 472 ADJUSTED VOL 0 07 426 506 CAPACITY 101 T`RAmcSsr- IFtTAT I UN RESEARCH CENTER CR I T T CAl- MOV F--'MF:h!I- !Atom#A1__ Y S I S DOTE F'Fq I /;F'F'F.'0VEn PM LEVEL OF SEF'k:V I C.E F-� SAIURAIION 4 CRITICAL_ NiS VOL. 4-(=f'9 CRITICAL E i tit '•,101 CRITICAL SUM F'3 IL C3 LANE GEOMEIRY NORTHBOUND SORTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDT14 MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH IRT. 12.0 ... .... T.. 12.0 ... .... 2 T.. 12.0 .... T.. 12.0 ... .... 3 ... .... ... .... LT. 12.0 ... .... a... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 0 117 0 THRU 683, C) 95B 0 RIGHT 46 0 O O TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 2 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 2 O .95 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 (MPEDS/HR). CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 409 0 409 0 LEFT 0 0 O O LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME O 0 117 0 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 98 0 CAPACITY 423 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 4 -tr OR d=i P4 ES I=- C:) F::Z -f- if% -1- 11 (:) M F=;: FEE S F-7'f-4 FR C_' " (_— F—= P4 -r I=— F:Z I-- FR T -r 1 (7- dmi I.. ri C3 %.,r F_- M E'P4 -V ocw r­.j e4l __ 'YS3 T E; SAT III -AT 1 (114 57 (-R I T 1 (-61 1-1,, 5 Ynl_ I C Fl.' I T I ('(-'l I E / W ',)01. GF;ATlOral SUM 1. *44. 4.4 i4 44 *.6.4 4i v 4. LANF bE(JI-IFTl__l'y NOR rIAROLINI► SOU I 14001JN0 EAsrBOt-IND WESTBOUND LANE mov WIDTH MOV W I DT H MCIV WIDTH MOV WIDTH I R.. 12. T.. 121. 0 1.. 12. 0 2 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 3 L.-I. 12.0 4 5 .... ... 6 TRAFFIC VOIAIMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 6 49 0 THRO 22 661 904 0 RIGHT 171 0 0 0 TRUCKS LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORT14BOLIND 3 0 .95 SOUTHROUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 2 0 .95 WESTBOUND 0 1 PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL. LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOLITHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 23 661 362 0 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 6 49 0 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 21 0 CAPACITY 0 638 0 0 MOVEMENT OK OK N/A N/A _r Fz OEN m C-:3 F• (_1 FR _r 0k T" I (-:) t\s F;: F7__ � F:, onk tz;: C_- " C e: " -r IFE F;t (--FR I _T_ T M C-3 V_ M F-7 P-J _T A Iq " I _-, V c-3 I S; CF3 w 01A F., /I !__3 (Al C-3 FZ3 -I Pf,;T F PH I APFROVE 1) F'M OF Shl UFAT I (lid CR'l I I (70( N/S 15 _7 -7 C f IA T 7 CAI F /W '.'CII_ X4 e_-i, ':5 CRITICAl Sliti 1. Ic) 41 AF Y 4 4 -6 1. -a 44- 4d li-.ic ai. 4. 4� I -AN[-: GE0IlFTF,Y NORTHBOUND so(ITHDOI IND EASTPOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDIII MCI'.) WIDTH MOV WIDTH 3 T.. 1( 1. Cl Rl'15.0 . ... .... 2 .... LT. 12.0 T.. 11.0 ... ... 3 L. 12.0 T.. .8.0 ... ... 4 L.. 12. ... .... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... .. .... .... ... .... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SO(JTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 904 0 0 THRU 1089 1061 0 RIGHT 0 cl 95 0 TRUCKS LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .95 EASTBOUND 6 Co .95 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :r. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT G 577 465 0 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 904 0 0 ADJUSTED VOL 0 985 0 0 CAPACITY 0 356 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A NIA N/A N/A 86-849" -jr IzZAtVE3F'flli'7-A-i" -1 flP4 F�E:t-_,EA�C H CEtVTER CFI T 7` Z CAI M(7) J1= h 1F tw!-r FahlA1_... Y�� I S Ptl SATUR/ii ) ON CRI T iCtii t11 CR1Tl(-Al 5t.41 UA14 :" OF() I iF I F;'r' NORTHBOUND SOHI HI-K)UND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MO'.' W 1 DTI-1 MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 11.0, R.. 12.C) R.. 11.0 R.. 12.0 2 T.. 11.0 T.. 11.C1 LT. 11.0 LT. 12.0 3 L.. 10.0 T.. 11.'r L.. 11.0 L.. 11.0 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHF401JND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 124 8 257 16B THRU BOB 1513 111 230 RIGHT' 28 611 196 75 TRUCtk::S M LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 1 0 .95 EASTBOUND 4 0 .95 WESTBOUND 2 0 .95 PHASING N/S :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#BEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 115 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 461 644 196 203 LEFT 102 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECF' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 124 6 257 16B ADJUSTED VOL 1102 0 259 154 CAPACITY 0 485 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A OI: N/A N/A TRAh1SF'O�TAT ? OtV �ESEARGH CE[tilTER CR I T I GAL.. MEE M E-L C4T AtVAI__YS I S SW VE / 544: 1 �.-- r RI:) / f..:-3uJ i =1 isT DA I F PH I {APPROVE U FM L_EVE_L OF SEF.VIi_'E SAI DRAT I ON r C;RITICAI, N/S V':ii_ 1L C:) CRITI( (Al. C/14 'J'�I_ :3C)7 CRITICAL fiUM 4'7 � I��w+Y�GY♦+.}Y iY��aa.b•y.. :. �.. .. ,+Ys ac +... ��.s r.. lE if LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOLITHPni 1ND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RTL 14.0 R.. 11.0 RT. 13.0 RT. 11.0 2 .... LT. 12. (" LT. 15. 0 LT. 11.0 3 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 20 0 25 THRU 0 109 357 1128 RIGHT 16 46 50 277 TRUCKS (Y.) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 .95 EASTBOUND 5 0 .95 WESTBOUND 5 0 .95 PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS _CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 15 120 210 807 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 20 O 25 ADJUSTED VOL 0 t► 0 0 CAPACITY 0 105 O 597 MOVEMENT OK OK OK OK E; F-= ok #=;z (_7 " T F;z n m vs F- F:;z -r ob -v i " rq F=;! FFCENTER C-_ rR T (7, V=t I U-) W F-7- M C f,i _T 4N 1\1 e-N I_. 'y E3 1 E3 r-4 F;c. J 1 1-:: V-- I I E_ ID I"(-) I E F I I I F, F 0 VE I Frl OF S 0 11.1 R'P T I () H f ---I C:p C R i T i 1. t,,;- I CRITIC(,[ 51-Ir1 7-5 LANE GLFRIF TRY NORTHBOUND S01.1THBOLINI1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WILITH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH I RT. 11 c) RT. I I . RT. 12. 0 RTL 12.0 2 LT. 11.0 LT. I I . 0 L. . 12.0 ... . . . . 4 ... . . . . . . . . . . . 5 .0. .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SDUTH90UND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 42 14 28 173 THRU 575 1615 32 202 RIGHT e3 59 110 10 TRUCKS LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 .95 EASTBOUND 5 0 .95 WESTBOUND 5 0 .95 PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 1i5 SECO14DS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 379 969 156 398 LEFT 0 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 42 14 28 173 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 0 164 CAPACITY 0 590 0 0 MOVEMENT OK 0K, N/A N/A c. ALLOWABLE DEVELOPMENT (PM PEAK) 2'R M #14 P4 c-3 F— " tz;z -r oc4 -r i " r-j r-,< E7 iF; F-r #mo F:;: CENTER C T C-Z; C-: (-N ly tNi I=—:- Tr-41 T:) romj F_'. _ I !F3 -T- At 0 4-4f m -W 41 4 * -v 41 .0 LEVEL OF SATURfil I (JIJ S _71 C F;.'I T I C A I t,l,, 111. 1 4-3 CRJTJCAL F/W I CRITIGil. 511H 1. :7- '7 12 t NOR THBOUNI E A S T ri 0 L I N 1) WESTBOUND LANE MOV WI LPTH mclkll (.41 Ff 114 MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 R. . RTI. 12.0 RTL 12.0 2 T.. 12.0 T.. 12. 3 1'.. 12. 0 1_.. 12. 0 4 L. . 12.0 ... .... ... 5 ... .... 6 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOLJ14D SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND, WESTBOUND LEFT 75 7c) 101 5 THRU 2230 1322 16 35 RIGHT 10 29 65 loo TRUCKS LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 2 0 .99 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .95 EASTBOUND 2 0 .95 WESTBOUND 2 0 .97 PHASING N/S :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W :3. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (NO OVERLAP) PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. C, — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL. LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 1206 760 166 141 LEFT 48 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 75 30 101 5 ADJUSTED VOL 48 0 so 0 CAPACITY 446 0 0 11 MOVEMENT N/A OK N/A NIA ANSF•OF:TA'1- I ON RESEARCH CENTEF;Z T I CAL_ MC)'VEMENT ANAt_YS I is 1*,1 IF A 4/ F- i' IV I_ C-4 S -T_ DA 1 F: PH 1 ALL(:1WAtA F'hl LEVEL. OF Pk SAI UN'OT I ON 48 CRITICAI t!%S Y1.11 7°�'-►>3 CRITICAL. E%W VCII 43�`._r CRITICAL_ SUM C-i==:-._- LA14F (iF (l1.11= TF'Y NORTHBOUND SOUTHDOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND _- LANE MUV WIDTH MOV W10TH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH _ 1 T.. 10. t) RT. 12 RL. 10.0 ... ... . 2 LT. 1C►.(:) t.. 12.�► ... .... ... .... _ 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... - _ 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... =- 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... - TRAFFIC VOLUMES ml NORTHBOUND SOUTHEOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 101 0 95 0 THRU 728 RIGHT C► 529 O 66 103 0 O TRUCKS (%) LOCAL. BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR - NORTHBOUND 2 0 .96 SORTHBOUND 0 .95 - EASTBOUND 0 0 .95 WESTBOUND 2 0 1 - PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION _ PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. O - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS -= CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND - _ THRU -RIGHT 442 326 0 0 LEFT 0 0 65 0 LEFT TURN CHECK INPUT VOLUME 101 0 95 0 ADJUSTED VOL 72 0 65 0 CAPACITY 4 0 O 11 - MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A ( ON M c-3 P M FZ -r ic% -I- T M M RESEARCH CEN_r I=— M is m 1 0:4m 1 ION rll iZ3 —T* D(_11TF F'H I o')1_1_Pt4PPl_E PM LIF 5f-_f-:VjFF Clt 4,01 1 (IN CFO T I CRITICAI 5141 (R-OMFIRY NORTHBOUND SOUTH1401114r, EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MnV WIDTH MCIV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH I R7. 1 1.0 R.. 10.0 R.. 11.0 2 T.. 11. T.. 10.Q T.. 11.0 3 ... L.. 10. 0 4 ... .... 6 ... ... .... ... .... ... .... :2= TRAFFIC VOLUMES mou NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 7 9 82 0 THRU 464 357 167 198 RIGHT 14 96 91 scl TRUCKS LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAt::: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .95 EASTBOUND 2 0 .95 WESTBOUND 2 U .95 PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED ► E/W :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS -CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 265 252 175 212 LEFT 0 51 0 LEFT TURN CHECK SiDUT, EAS WES'r80U;.l) INPUT VOLUME 7 9 82 0 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 51 0 CAPACITY 13 0 0 as MOVEMENT OK OK N/A oK 4 ANc_=_3F'(DFZ"TA-T T "INJ FRE_:5E=-_AEZf:-FI CrNTFE:;z ` p S T tgAT F: PH I AI I oWAEU. f_ f •M t- F VF_l Hf- f:;f.:1 V l F I_ i SAItIF,'OIlf)N I r_► I CR' T ICAI rJ 1`7c:;17';';a r_RITlci,1 ;�(Ir•1 1 f-�f.c. I_ANF- (A-1Ir1f [I-''r NORTHBOUND S011T HP(JI IND EAST ROUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MC)V 14TDI[A MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 10. U RT. 14. o RIL 14.0 RT. 10.0 2 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.C1 ... .... LT. 10.0 3 L... 14.0 L.. 10.6 ... .... L.. 10.0 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... S... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOI-. !MES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 218 1 "co 25 99 THIRU 2147 17,36 1 11 1 11 R13HT 108 35 49 151 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND I Q .95 SOUTHBOUND 3 0 .95 EASTBOUND 1 0 .95 WESTBOUND 3 0 .95 PHASING N/S :4. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 2. 100 — 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 105 SECONDS CRITICAL. LANE VOLUMES HY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 1269 705 164 135 LEFT 184 97 0 O LEFT TURN ('HF(,I,' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 210 120 25 99 ADJUSTED VOL 205 97 0 73 CAPACITY 687 0 O O MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 86--84 %" � 1'RANSF"(lf=: "TAT Z QN f=:ELF= AF:;C(-:H CFNTEF;t ,.�.•, CCU T T I CAL .. M(7tJF:-Mf= 1"II ANAL_ Y:F3 I S NE 1. r / I 7:�? j f%,l DATF PH 1 Al-1 .114A.PLE FM .x LEVEL OF 1-IFF".' I ('L- L=: SATI IRAT I ON IGS CR I I I C AL. N.";N."S VEIL 'i'' 4..) _7 . rRITICAL. 571AN I c_?14 LANE FiFOHF 1'RY NOR1 HBOUND SOUTHHOHNI) EESTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WTDTH MOV WIDTH MnV WIDTH MOV WIDTH • 1 T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... R.. 12.0 2 T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... T.. 12.0 3 I_. . 12.0 ..• .... ... ••.• .•. • ..• 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLT IMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 4_0t1 LEFT 763 <'► O 0 THRU 981 <', 0 794 RIGHT 0 tl 0 22 TRUCKS (Y.) LOCAL BUSES (#/HH) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 12 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 0 O 1 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 24 0 .95 - PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEFERATION —°� E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) - CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT _4m NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 607 0 0 1036 LEFT 907 0 0 0 LEFT T{IFT1 r�i.lrrr_. NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 763 0 0 0 ADJUSTED VOL 907 0 0 0 " CAPACITY 687 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A s: 86�843" Y!S T c—:3 rq F=- I i(-N f:--4 V) ( I - F F�: i(-N M F> PO T I Ffq I (11-1.014(A-fl-E FTI 4-*+ 4. #* +* * 41+ LEVE1 (If' '_(j-'l)I(_j f,j (-I I t �j k) n 1, CENT T I W p • CR IT I CF,l S 1111 1 e--.v C--) :1. LANE NORTHBOUND SOU I HBOL.1141) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH T.. ll..", ... .... T.. 12.0 2 T.. I T.. 12.0 T.. I 1 .0 ... ... 4 ... .... 5 ... .... .... ... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 THRU 1715 0 0 1255 • RIGHT 0 0 0 0 rRUCPI*S LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 12 cl .95 SOUTHBOUND, 0 0 EASTBOUND 0 WESTBOUND 24 0 .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY i. 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 12U SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOLITHDOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 741 0 0 860 LEFT 0 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND, EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 0 0 0 ADJUSTED VOL 0 c) 0 0 .t CAPACITY 687 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A TF�ARl�1=•CIF�'TAT T IJFVi r !� :r3L-�aIE�t-:t--i C.EN-TER �1 t;F:;-� T I_ l t:.:Al -1 AFVF�I YEll [ hJ�;-:' AVl=" / 1 -'-.'?•--; 1�.11t1= 1 !-1 F=;�"�Iv1t=-' 1 �A I F 1-'I 1 1 i a(I fllJfiNl L Fl l LEVEL Ol ,(� {•.'J ] (.,L �"•� SAT 1E-;r, l T (IN 40 �'Pl T, CR I T I CAI ;mil 41 -7 LANE ICE C+htl:: T k Y NORTHBOUND SOU I HT+Ol11d1) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 110k) WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 ... .... T.. I R.. 12.0 ... .... • 2 ... .... LT. 12.0 T.. 12. 0 ... .... 3 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOI. LIMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOU14D EASTBOUND WESTBOUND C LEFT 0 1 0 0 THRU U 426 4-Z,9 0 RIGHT 0 C► 311 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 .95 EASTBOUND 3 C► .95 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 0 247 475 0 LEFT 0 i.► 0 0 LEFT TURN CHF_CK Niiii T l-.66 NL SGU i ili:O l,43 Er STHUt;, fD WES T bOUN,; INPUT VOLUME 0 1 0 0 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 cl 0 CAPACITY 687 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 0aRA ... :.�.�_, _.:.�.: .�.�,��:=:�„ �,..•�....,. , _- � ,_:.��: __ ���.:�=gin (:F =7 r I..j T 1-= i� 1 1-1 F- V4 'T 0k 91-11 (A L , ly!F3 15 pi T 7-11 !__A C I I- i _T,_ e-N 1-1 F=l pu-il F 114 1 f't.l t-E.-VEI Ht- e- SOT lif-:6T T (44 3a "I vcll_ ct 7. • CRITICAL_ �-,(JN z7f 4. 4. LANL Gt-n[-lF-lRr NORTHBOUND SOUTHROH1.11) EASTPOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH Mciv WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 T.. I. () T.. 12.0 2 ... .... T.. 1 2.0 :3 ... .... LT. 12. ... .... 4 6 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 50 0 0 THRU 677 286 0 RIGHT 0 0 0 0 TRUCKS LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 .95 EASTBOUND 4 0 .95 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 0 282 31:3 0 LEFT 0 C) 0 LEFT TURN CHECF' NORTHBUUNI) SOUTHBUUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 50 0 0 ADJUSTED VOL 23 0 0 CAPACITY 687 0 0 MOVEMENT NIA N/A N/A 0 N/A low .s.. tr.�.. F--;t •(7F:;Z-TAT I f_7M F; F- SE4NrR CENT"EF;Z CFI I 'T I Cf•4L.. M(7VL=I" iI_=_hl-F- 44r%4L. YS I T3 r 1) F FIA ] ral_I nt4►'1tiLF_ FM 1_EVFl OF �A-F:VIC SAT UFA1 1 (111 73 _ CR I T I CAI t,l '''_, V01.. 't '-ice ,:{ , 7 • CFI I T I CAI SUM 1 - ��'�'�iFii'ifit���***iF}*}at}}�t�c�}Y�F��+F#i�iF���!•� L_AtdF. CiF(11.1F TR'1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHT-01UND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV W[DrH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 R.. 12.0 T.. 12. R.. 12. 0 ... ... . 2 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.. 0 L.. 12. 0 ... ... . 3 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 1_.. 12.0 ... .... — 4 T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC WILUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 U 727 O - THRU 2245 1474 0 0 •:.•.•<. •: RIGHT 646 0 72 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL. BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 O .95 SOUTHBOUND 5 .95 EASTBOUND 5 C► .99 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) - CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE V0LUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 909 597 O O LEFT 0 C► 407 O t_EFT Tl►l=.t,l r!-{rrs.„ NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 0 727 0 ADJUSTED VOL. O 0 776 O CAPACITY 312 O O O MOVEMENT OK OK N/A N/A 86-849� -F— 4%MSF='"F=rT44T I "M Fr ESF'AFz<CF-f CEhITEi;Z CF-< T -F- 7 f-:A1__ MILIVF-MF- NMI'- ARIA I__ Y S I S t�1 F=- ] A F:=" / Fr! I== f_z)� E T- L1AT F FH 1 (fl L OWADI F FT1 LEVEL OF .,F-r.vlCc F=_: SAT UR(4 T ION 8 CRl TTFAI hl!5 ','nl "-`:;'c-P • CR I T I CAL Sl.lht ]. &w t_) i3 **#*v i*M***4*4*# LANE (3E 1.lt-11- T R'r NORTHBOUND StIl ITIADOUND EAST BOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 T.. 11.0 ... .... ... .... RT. 14.0 2 T.. 11.0 ... .... ... .... T.. 12.0 3 L.T. 12.0 ... .... ... .... ... .... 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 148 0 0 0 THRU 1213 O 0 662 RIGHT 0 0 0 149B TRUCk:S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 4 C► .95 SOUTHBOUND 0 Q I EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 4 0 .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. G - 99 (#F'EDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 529 0 0 1079 LEFT 0 0 O O LEFT T11��N C1HF(-k' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND -= INPUT VOLUME 148 0 O O - ADJUSTED VOL 128 0 O 0 l Cl 312 O O O AAPACITY —� MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 8�-849� re T'MANSF C3FRT4%T I Ohl F=.:F SF=__/-%F;;'(.H CENTER C F::Z I T' X f: A L_ M (_-) %�l f-_.1-11=-- tV A P%J A i._ Y S I S • Iir-;T F PH 1 Nhl *41+*f*4.41 +Y+t44 YMYi�Y# I_E VFI. OF SATIIF:A7 It 11.1 45 • CRITi(_i.il I1.11.1 i=t s3 *'*********Y****Y1e*-01.-**4******1!Y•iFir' LAN[ IiE: C1h1E :7 f :'r' NORTHL=►OUNI► S0O7 HFln(INC! EAST HOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WID1H MLIV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... RT. 18.0 2 T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... T.. 12.0 3 T. 12.0 ... .... ... .... ... .... 4 LT . 12. Co ... .... ... ... . 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC V01 LIMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 57 0 0 0 THRU 1026 0 0 658 RIGHT 0 0 O 321 TRUCKS ('/.) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK; HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 0 t:► 1 EASTBOUND O �) 1 WESTBOUND 5 0 .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS CRITICAL_ LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 305 0 0 503 LEFT O C) `) O LEFT TURN CHECK; 2viJ►� flirlLil: iau SOLI Th5CjLiE•.0 EAST bOUNG WES TL'+U(. Nci INPUT VOLUME 57 0 O 0 ADJUSTED VOL 23 0 O O CAPACITY 312 O p 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A r 44, 'fil om� rq Es r-- (D rR -ir oc% -r r Ohl r--< r=-!-3 F= ob F:;! c-- 1-i (-_ 1= 1,4 -r l=- F;t DA11: PH 1 ftl SAI I IR, I I (,11 Q CRA r I cot r w CRITICAL !--;I 11.1 e--" f-3 4"n LAH11 6[ NORTHBOUND s(RillA1,10(11.11', EAST 1�01JND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH I... .... RT. 13'. 0 ... T.. 17.0 2 ... T.. I C .-I .... T.. 10.0 3 T.. 12. t") ... L.. l000 4 T.. 12. 0 ... 5 6 .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 0 339 THRU 0 678 0 364 RIqHT 0 60 0 0 TRUCKS LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 e EASTBOUND 0 0 WESTBOUND 2 0 .75 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SePERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS) CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND NESTBOUND THrU -RIGHT 254 0 233 LEFT 0 0 0 432 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOuND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 0 339 C4 ADJUSTED VOL 0 432 CAPACI TY 0 4895 _r M A P4 c-3 r-- " F< -r ocN -r I "1`! F< [—::: !-=; FE Ono F;: U—_ FA CENTER F<- T -T 1 C7- (A t. kv, [NJ Ec I C—=; -7 f!:N ly rl-li I=- T:-j I 17 i 1% 1 F ('tl OF S01 I IR�)_T 1 ()14 gc -F-A T I C'OL I I V p t. 1 X. 4Z? cr< 17 1 c A t. LAHE (711-TIML 1 PN NORTHBOUND SOOT HDP( INN EAb T DOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV W 11) T*H MOV tAJTbT(A tl(.')V WIDTH MOV WIDTH RT. 20.0 T.. — O RT. 12.0 ... .... 2 T.. I". ( * 1 T.. 12. 0 T.. 12. () 3 T.. 12.0 T . . 12'. Cl LT. 12.0 ..a .... 4 T.. 12.0 T . . 1". 0 5 k , i 6 L . . 12.0 . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 119 361 0 THRU 2272 167" 13213 0 RIGHT 104 132 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 .96 EASTBOUND 5 cl .95 WESTBOUND 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY i. 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 647 502 386 0 LEFT 0 49 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 119 361 0 ADJUSTED VOL 0 95 377 0 CAPACITY 312 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A r T 4--1Iq llz: 1:3 F-7 " F;Z 11— V f V: IF PAT FEE F:;t 11-- F:;t 1: -1 11' (7, L p1l m F== 1\1 "I oth t%11 (A I !--i I LEW (11 47 C P, I T I C (�l 1.1 1; .Til el 1 IF _1 CR I T I C. (-il 1-It I NORTHUFAINI'l Solt r 1-11111 )111 iii)fou,inUND WESTBOUND LANE mov wiDrH MOV I'll I UT [i MOV WJDTH MOV WIDTH I ... .... T.. 14.i1 RT. 11. 2 T.. 13. ff ... .... ... .... LT. I I . T.. 1.". 0 ... .... 4 ... ... .... ... .... ... 5 ... .... ... .... ... ... 6 ... .... .... o.. .... TRAFFIC VOl.UMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 397. 0 0 THRU 0 631 (31 Fj 0 RIGHT 0 Cl 251 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 11 0 .95 EASTBOUND 2 it .95 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEFERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2. 100 — 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLIPIES DY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHDOU14D EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 0 418 432 0 LEFT 0 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 393 0 0 ADJUSTED VOL 0 445 0 0 CAPACITY 0 485 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A WA i` +IAlySF' C) rA-T .I t_7hl FSf= .af �C=.H C-EhlTI=F:;� C� I ?' I CFai.__ MC;IVF t"IEhI'T At'+1A►t __ Y.�3 I S '_3 T DATF PH I r=il 1_01JiiEAi E PH -+t it •IF*�Fi *i! i}ii iti*#ti+ii 41 ii4� I_EVLI_ (IF- .;L:F '•.'I CC A SAT, F T I (,(1 51 CFI TICAL f /W '•101 r4 -7' CRITI(:AI NIM 'ill, ] 6� iE*�'� ��!'iFi1 �i'Yi i i} M i i y i w� r i 1Ji* i'� �'►!�*'�•�"K' t_ANI.' GE011F TR V NORTHBOUND SOOTHDOHN1) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 11.o ... .... T.. II.C► ... 2 T.. 11.0 ... .... T.. I I . 0 ... 3 1'. . 1 I . r'► ... .... I. 1 . i 1 . O ... ... . 4 ... .... ... .... ... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC Vfll.lJltF_.S NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOI.IND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT G 0 317 0 THRU 1117 i.i 816 0 RIGHT 167 0 0 0 TRUCKS lX) LOCAL. BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 0 C► 1 EASTBOUND 1 0 095 WESTBOUND t;► 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. i► - 99 (#F'EDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH ; 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOl_UF•1ES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHNOIJND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 494 r_► 422 0 LEFT 0 C► 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECI:' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 0 317 0 ADJUSTED VOL 0 C► 313 C1 . CAPACITY 0 485 r1 ► 86-°849" IrMdc%NSFz"f_lFZCTAT I "M F;ZF SE` AF (7," t^ENTE=M CE<c T 1' T CAI__ MI-1tlE- f 1E=_1V 1 Ahlral__ YS I S 1�1 M T A M I • / N 1= ./ 1"1 �--:p 4---; 'T" rl(-iTF F'li ] PM #* #t«#tt+1-0t-t«46,611 #t I_EVE I O1 E=E''.'TCE: !a SAT 14-:01 1 (it 1 24 CR I T I Cr14. rJ 'JC)I I I C k URITIC'Ni_ :jfl -4 :t_, t1FiFlfi��.iE##iF#}F##fit-t##+:i#�i} f}}#�##�F1�1!•iFiF LANE NORTHBOUND SOLITHBOUNn EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 ... .... T.. 11.0 RT. 11.0 ... .... 2 ... .... T.. 11.o T.. 11.0 3 ... .... I_T. 12.T.. 11.0 ... .... 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ,... S... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT O 90 0 0 THRU 0 235 773 O RIGHT (1 0 76 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND O 0 1 SOUTHBOUND O 0 .95 EASTBOUND O U .95 WESTBOUND 1 O 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT O 110 325 O LEFT O O O O LEFT TURN CHECK ��. ii►.�u;.► du SOU EAS i ilouND wk`bl L+0ui,4.: INPUT VOLUME O 90 O O ADJUSTED VOL O 59 O O CAPACITY 312 G C► U MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A irUR fVSF=•Ot�TAT-ION RESEAi�GH CEhlTER _ CFz I T I c;Ai_. mn%,yv MEm-r AN/c4l. YS I S NW AUr._ / NIfJ ; T DATE PH I (-)I. I _C�W 141 F F•1.1 LEVEL_ Of � E:1-:" I CE )E:? SAT I IF:/aT l (111 El i=T CR l T 1 CAL. N% V01 "? a CR I T I C'AL_ . (ir1 i_ 14 tT k_1, iF *• � �F *' � � � � * } � * � i # * Y �[ 4' } i � Ji r as � Y •i * iF * � *• �! 'i I_AN (,EOr•tE=TR, NORTHF+pIJtll) SOLITHROLINI'l EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV W I DTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV W: UTH i RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 2 L.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 L... 12.0 T.. 12.0 3 ... .... ... .... ... .... L.. 12.0 4 ... .... ... .... ... 5 ... .... .... ... .... ... .. 6 ... .... .... ... .... .. .... ... .... ... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 206 16 93 110 THRU 376 179 171 733 RIGHT 79 20 41 107 TRUCE'S ( G ) LOCAL BUSES c # /HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 2 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 3 0 .95 EASTBOUND 3 0 .95 WESTBOUND 1 0 .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2. 100 - 599 (MPEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOl_UMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 509 221 240 480 LEFT 191 0 64 82 LEFT TURN CHECK' NORTHBOUND SOUTHNOUND EA5T'NQUI.ID WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 206 16 93 110 ADJUSTED VOl_ 191 0 64 82 CAPACITY 312 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 8E--848'~ •fi`RANSEOF:zz-rook T I "m t=1E E.AF7CH CENTER _ C�F:c :I 'T I GA!_ ML7v�_ME==fti!`T AhiA1__. YS I S T- D/-� l F- f-'1i 1 ►it_f (7(�t;�F�I.I= F't•1 1_EVI:I_ nFE_1=:VIC:E 53 FRITICra1 H "_, VOL i NORTHE+nUND s0l 11*401JND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 110V WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 T.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 ... .... T.. 12.0 2 T.. 12.o T.. 12.0 ... .... L.. 12.0 3 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... 4 L.. 12.0 T.. 12.4:► ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFF 1C VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND - LEFT 132 U c:► 67 ,• THRU 2053% 1688 U 68 . RIGHT c) 256 t► U TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 0 .95 SOLITHBOUND 5 0 .95 EASTBOUND 5 0 1 WESTBOUND 5 0 .95 PHASING N/S :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2. 100 — 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS CRITICAL_ LANE VOLUMFS BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 832 684 G 75 i LEFT 111 U 0 35 LEFT TI.1RN CHECV' +:un "►yaulii1u �iJli n� u; ;,;� EHST aUU1v1) WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 132 CF 0 67 ADJUSTED VOL 111 i► O 35 p CAPACITY 148 U G 0 MOVEMENT N/A OK N/A N/A I-- F;Z I -V I C--. PI F='P4 _U 04 1 'y E3 1 $3 • hl rl I 0!:-N M T - nAlf- PH I F'll **4. -0 LP)El (11' SATURATION .34 CIP I T I CAI t,i vnt i i e, CR I T I C iAl '511H 'e­ -7 LA14F 6 E 0 M [l F­1 NORTHBOUND SOLITHPOLIND EASTPOLIND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDT14 .... pi. 1u.0 ... .... T.. 11.0 2 T.. I().0 ... .... LT. 11.0 3 ... .... ... .... 4 ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... .... .. 6 .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 0 0 133 THRU 0 372 0 452 RIGHT 0 107. 0 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 .95 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 5 0 .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2. 100 - 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 0 286 0 321 LEFT 0 cl 0 0 1-7-c'r TU!'N ru=rf­- NURTHSOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 0 0 133 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 119 CAPACITY 148 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A NIA N/A N/A 86-849' 4 om� PR A ME4 F=" C3 F:;t -r 00o -T- X FR FEE S3 FEE A IR V_- " (-- a=— r-j -r R: F:z I-- I-- At._ t%lt lVErlF'hJI AhJFaL N' c.3 I ES P4 W F 7-- z IN I w I !-.-; -I- ff(A I f- VIA I +i 41 *41 LEYE-1- Pf- ��F CE SAI U k, I I ( ljJ 53 Cp I I 1 11) CRI t- (411F CAJ111.11- I k NORTHBOUND SO[ 11 111i0l IND EASTDOUND, WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH M(.'IV Wl1)rf4 MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 7.. 1O.0 R.. I vi, o R.. 12.0 2 L.. 1 (). cl T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 3 LT. 12.0 4 6 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 86 Cl 0 144 THRU 579 315 0 483 RIGHT 0 J35 0 42 TRUCKS LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 2 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 3 0 .95 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 1 0 .95 PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2. 100 - 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 621 541 0 329 LEFT 30 r) Cl t_FFT TIPP'll NGA rri6iL1l'4D SOUTH60UND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 86 0 0 144 ADJUSTED VOL 30 0 0 120 CAPACITY 280 0 0 0 MOVEMENT 0K. OK N/A N/A I I -4 ink P4 4.s i=- ri s< -ir A -ir i ci i-i Fzz F-7, c-:; F=- FR u-, " 17-17=: " -r e: M F< T T, r C-1 A I- m n %ly F:- m F-=--, Iq "u, 074 r%li f_lk I . YE-3 1 cls F__ *i V- I - (no 1=T 1 . ll=ti Del fr, Pit I fi(.( 1XV1.1. OF SAT (11 11 It I CRIl 11 N VFI 1 17 'et CRITICAL. S(Ill I 'el '--77 4'-P I. ANF (;F-nmf- I I-"r NORTHBOUND SOUTHDOUND Ei'AST POUND WESTBOUND LANE MDV WIDTH mov WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH I To. 10.0 R7. 14.0 Roo 10.0 RT. 10.0 2 L.. 11.0 ... .... Lo. 11.0 L.. 12.0 3 .... ... .... 4 . . . . 6 6 . 0 . . . 0 0 . No. .... . 5 ... ... .... ... .... . a . . 6 ... .... ... .... ... ... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SDUTHBOU14D EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 237 0 7-13 135 THRU 386 316 0 607 RIGHT 0 46 143 147 TRUCKS LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .95 EASTBOUND 2 0 .95 WESTBOUND 0 0 .98 PHASING, N/S :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W :3. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (NO OVERLAP) PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2. 100 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 410 360 0 806 LEFT 224 0 45 106 LEFT T1 IRM CHFCl!` NORTHBCJU14D SOUTHBOU14D EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 237 0 76 135 ADJUSTED VOL 224 0 45 106 CAPACITY 50 174 0 611 MOVEMENT N/A OK N/A N/A hISP'OR7 AT I ON F F_SE*ARf_-ENTEF? T 'i I CAI__. Mt7�,►EME"h!T ANAL. %e I S S1= 1. ACE' / -3F- I I's- - ' DATE. PH I 61-1- 014APLE F'ht * + +****+***+**b*#-+-****++++ 4.40 LE-VE1 OF Star I IF;i ,1 1 t Itd 40 . CRITICAL 5111.1 '13 ++*t*f+-WI:x*-+*t IF+1Fi�i�1� LANE G1_0HFTF''i NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOL11•11) I-ASTNOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 11.0 ... .... T.. 12.0 ... .... 2 T.. 11.0 ... .... T.. 12.0 ... .... 3 T.. 11.o ... .... E.T. 12. 0 ... ... . 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 0 385 0 THRU 384 0 854 0 low RIGHT 195 0 0 0 'TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 6 Q .95 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 5 0 .95 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 2. 100 — 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 247 0 481 0 LEFT 0 0 ►_► 0 NCR ri ►cu Nl; SOUTHBUUND EASTSGUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 0 385 0 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 405 0 CAPACITY 50 174 0 611 _ - MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A NIA 'fi' irtVS�`f�RTAT I uirj RE SE:ono RC:H CEfRiTEF? MCIVFP'IFNT ANAL__ YS I SW .r AvF / ��_w 7 L=3-F DATF F-14 ] F F'M SA I l lf-1 , I 1 (1hl 63 CR 1 1 l C;AL • CRT T I C#'il ,I IN L.ANF GF_OHI l F r NORTHE401lr4 } sOt 11 llyfll IMF) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MGV (41pi-H MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 12.0 LT. 11.0 R.. 11.0 ... .... 2 T.. II.0 L.. 10.0 T.. 11.0 ... .... 3 ... .... ... .... T.. 11.0 ... .... 4 ... .... ... .... L.. 17.0 ... .... S... . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... .. 006 a.:: TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 309 178 0 THRU 471 40', Fj6', 0 RIGHT 183 0 6q 0 TRUCKS (Y.) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 3 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 4 .95 EASTBOUND 0 0 ,95 WESTBOUND 2 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 2. 100 — 599 (#F'EDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS CRITICAL. LANE VOLUMES DY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOL114D EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 392 3134 311 0 LEFT 0 0 140 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHbQUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 309 178 0 ADJUSTED VOL 0 313 156 0 CAPACITY 50 174 0 611 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 86-8490' I I Al-l-OwAl-fl-F, PM I-EVEI, (IF !';Fl" Yl C F: sm I jv-,,oa i ot.j 77 CRITICAl. VOL 1 T • t-RITICAl !,11H I c? NORTHBOUND b0l 11 HDOLH-11) EAST BOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDIH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 ... .... R.. 11.0 ... T.. 10.0 2 T.. 11.0 ... LT. 10.0 3 T.. 11.0 ... .... L.. 10.0 4 ... .... ... ... .... 5 ... .... ... 0.. .... 6 .0. .... ... .. .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 r i 0 2153 THRU 0 780 0 380 RIGHT 0 139 0 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 cl I SOUTHBOUND 1 0 .95 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 0 0 .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND THRU -RIGkf' 0 435 0 LEFT 0 0 0 WESTBOUND 958 0 NQkiHBJUND sourilwGui-41i EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 0 0 2153 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 0 2339 CAPACITY 50 174 0 611 f,.r,.'7-MENT N/A Ni4 N/A ----------- C� "TMANSt='ORTAT I RF--r1EARGF-4 CENTER C:R I T i' C ;At.._ MCIVF-=Mt=NT AM#rAI __ V S T E; S M1AMT• /AWE . EVEI OF SA1 (N-•AT ] (7I.1 100 (-RITICAI_ Il%S V01 CR 1 T 10r iL_ ; LIN l_ 1 -w+ ► L.ANI . GE_UF]L-: T F: NORTHBOUND SO11THFOUNIr EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 T.. 10.0 T.. 10. 0 ... .. , . RT. 11.0 2 L.. 10.Q ... .... ... .... LT. 11.0 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ■_ 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 336 0 177 THRU 185 ,,(1 728 1 RIGHT 0 0 0 27 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 3 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 3 C► .95 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 1 0 .95 PHASING N/S :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2. 100 - 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 200 355 0 LEFT 341 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECk' NURTHBUI, NO SuU i H60UiJll EASTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 336 0 0 WESTBOUND 1C►18 0 WESTBOUND 177 ADJUSTED VOL 341 0 157 .; CAPACITY 0 496 0 611 MOVEMENT N/A Ok: N/A - T IR A% Mc.3 1=1 " V-< r 4N _V I gq IR F—= F3 F-=- Ono F::Z C-7 V1 CL= NTER PH I PM E- 1. CR I T I CAI- 14 V1 ll- 1 7% 1 1 Cl-.,ITTCf')I. E-14 1 .1 1 *-- J, R'l T I (_ i) I . Still I -e4-!:' 77; NORTHBOUND SOLITHDOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH IRT. 12. RT. ... .... R.. 12.0 2 T.. 12. T.. 12.0 ... .... RT. 12.0 3 Tea 12. 0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 4 La. 12.0 L. 12.0 ea.. 5 L. 12.0 .... ... .... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOOND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 978 0 0 0 THRU 1854 1558 0 257 RIGHT 99 339 0 39 TRUCKS LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 1 0 .95 EASTBOLIND 0 0 .95 WESTBOUND 0 0 .95 PHASING N/S :4. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 2. 100 — 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 115 SECONDS CRI,rICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRIJ —RIGHT 7 766 757 0 112 LEFT TURN CHECK INPUT VOLUME NORTHBOUND 978 SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 ADJUSTED VOL 1056 C-) 0 CAPACITY 139 "T_ M A M c-3 F:mM F;t 'r 44 -r I CAN FR FEE !S e: 000 F< (—_ " (= 1—= " -r M: F:;t GRIT T r__ A L_ m (D v u� rl E___ m _r 414 m on� I— IV, CS I is J- D 1 U. PH I Fm 49 * M + 44 # # + -" 4 * + # 4- -0 44 * 49 4t 4- 4& 1 E*%,'Fl (71 SA T '!Ro i I J ('114 76 UR I T I C (41- 5 4 ez, Cli I T I CiAl L , W U-1 �5—. CR I T I (—At-, !_;(_lH I !Tf C? LANE. 6U0ME.TRV NORTHBOUND SOUTIABOUND EASTFIFil-IND WESTBOUND LAW:- MOV 14 1 D7 H Mov OJI DI H MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH I r.. 1,41: . 0 ... RT. 11.0 2 T.. 12.(,) ... 1.. 11.0 3 LT. 12.0 T.. 11.0 4 6 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 679 co 0 0 THRU 655 Cl 0 1675 RIGHT 0 0 0 453 TRUCKS LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 0 1 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND I C) .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2. 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 120 SECONDS -CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 506 0 0 853 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NOR ThF 1UND SOUTH8QUND EASTSOUND WESTSO(JrlG INFU_ VOLUME 679' . 0 0 0 ADJUSTED VOL 738 0 0 0. CAPACITY 0 789 61 0 MOVEMENT NIA N/A N/A N/A 81`849b- coo T R #t% " 13 F- C3 r-< I- A -V I " M Fk r=- fS I-= 0k r-< C,- " CENTER I-- Ft 1 -7- 1 GAL. M Cl %-,' U_ PI Fl- f*-J _r ANAL. N" S3 1 E3 wm i ( -1 E3 t^j �2 ff_4 7 i=; Fll 1 (41. I 014API F PM LEVE1_ OF SAI URo I I 'I'l 81 CR 11 I L421,1 H k.101 14 -7 -,:1 CR I I I C-YA- (.'A.J(l 1 i-ANE GEOHE rf-:'( NORT1411OLIND SOU f HPOLIND EAS I 14CUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH WIDTH MOV WIDTH I T.. 11.0 PT. I j . k) ... .... RT. 11 . 2 L.T. 11. T.. I I., ... .... T.. 11. 3 ... .... LT. 11.0 4 5 ... ... .... ... 6 ... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOiAJMES NOR rHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT Fj 2 0 0 198 THRU 457 72B 0 1978 RIGHT 0 103 0 340 TRUCKS LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 4 0 .95 EASTBOUND 0 1 WESTBOUND 5 0 .95 PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED q E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 265 474 0 991 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTr�OUND W 17'n- T 1-:10 U! -.'r, INPUT VOLUME 52 0 0 - 198 ADJUSTED VOL 0 (1 0 194 CAPACITY 0 209 0 0 MOVEMENT OK OK N/A N/A `rMnp4SF=p"FiTA—T I. "1%,l Fz<F= SEAIRC_'h1 CENT'EF;Z CFI T T T CAI1%1"VFEE ME: Ah1A1_ Dit ( ('H 1 (4-1_014A1"t.E FM SAT( F "1 1 1 il,l 47 ('R I i 1 (_'itil IJ %T11 Ct-1,1-r11'+;l I tl '!(1l l=it'�C, cp. II ICAl :�1I(1 Fes."=f3 ++�++4+++f4f+++**** LANE cE (Ar1F1 F:Y NOR1 HHOUNI) SOOTiirio l Itd1i EASTBOUND WESTF�01JND LANE M(lV W I 1)T 14 MOO W I I1)1 H MOV W 1 01 11 MOV WIDTH IT.. ]'_1 ... .... ... .... RT. 1 ] . O 2 L.. 12. ... .... T.. 11.0 3 ... .... ... .... ... .... LT. 11.0 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 • . • • • . • • w • • . • • w . . • . . w . . . . . . . 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHEOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 26 0 734 THRU 30 0 0 13B6 RIGHT 0 <:► 0 131 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (*/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 3 C► .95 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 0 cl 1 WESTBOUND 1 0 .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 32 t► 0 806 LEFT 0 <:► C► 0 LEFT TURN CHECK: Ill iF V T VOLoNE . 6 V 4 i .;. I r ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 0 785 CAPACITY 0 356 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A I-8491" IrMA mSPfjRTAT I ON RE r3EARGH CENTER CR I I- I: (--AI._ MC)WEMEM-r M 44 1YS I S SW 4 AVF / SW 7 "1 / 1 ors RAI its' DF-, f 1 f-' 1 J (il, I.01,)(APL E F-41 I_F_VEL • FIF- ' T I -A T LL F= SA1 I I IH 90 CR 11 I F I l H �, '.'OI 1 1 i CR I "f I 1 I=al I . t'1 '•1I11 C'f-;11T(�11 �111 1L'.44 _ I AH1 I F.I I1-1F I f• Y 190 RAM/ FI1J NAHI II II lI , FAST HOUND WESTPOUND LANE MOV W I DTIA MnV 6J 1 F► T; l MOV WIDTH MOV W I DTH j T.. 12. RT. 1 h. , I ... .... T.. 14.0 1— 12. T.. 12. 0 ... .... LT. 11. 3 T.. 12. ij ... .... ... .... L. 11.0 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... b... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VUl_.L.1MES NORTHBOUND SOUTHHnUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 i;► ( 709 THRU 1881 469 �) 695 RIf HT ii 56 0 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL. RUSES (#/HR) FEAV.:: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 3 0 .95 SOUTHNOUND .95 EASTROU14D 0 <► 1 WESTBOUND 3 0 .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEFERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERA'fION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. () — 99 (#PFDS/Hk) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CR I T I CAl_ LANE VOL.tJt• l:-S BY 11OVEM♦rNT NORTHBOUND SOUTHNOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 747 264 0 533 LEFT U C► O 0 LEFT TURN CHECK' NORTHBOUND SORTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VC!I.IJMF f1 r� r•I ^ % 2 CAPACITY 0 221 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A • 7 N is i_-, ci F.< - v otN -v x " im iR F r--I:;: T T,1 1170not. t� 114C F 1­_ I - V. 00,./1 1 i F T-4 17-31 IF DI-111- f I'll SAII (11_4a I 1 11,1 1 __R1 T 1 14 '­'(11 7-, CR I I I E. 61 11 11-1 LAt -.1 F- b N I R NORTHBOUND SOUTHHOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH Rl» 11 1;. 12.0 R.. I o. 0 2 T.. 11.0 1*. 12. T.. 1,2. RL. 11.0 3 T.. 11.0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12. L.. 10.0 4 L.. 12. 0 L.. 12.Q 5 L.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 TRAFF I G VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT Q 116 461 516 THRU 1444 1372 ::%a(,) 0 RIGHT 140 0 477 E376 TRUCKS LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 1 0 .95 EASTBOUND 1 0 .95 WESTBOUND 4 0 .95 PHASING N/S :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2. 100 - 599 (OPEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 115 SECONDS CRITICAL. LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THPIU -RTrHT 6?4 4 LEFT TLJR14 CHECK, NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 116 461 516 ADJUSTED VOI. 0 94 479 557 CAPACITY 139 4 0 0 MOVEMENT OV* N/A LANE 1 -rmomkmc_=;F-"RTAT I "m RESFAR(—_" CENTER C R I T I C O=o L. M Q V F_ M != h! "T A lt••l A l .. _ Y S I S I)(;1 f= F'l1 I All P140H1 F F'M S/1T l IF:i4T I (111 68 VOI -i t::?"} CPA r I CAI 1_ !11 V(11. `_, I f:a CR I T I CAL '.3I Ir•1 LANE t4E0MFT R"f' NORTHBOUND SOUTHHOUND EAST FOUND WESTBOUND MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH RT 1'^ (► A. T. 12.... .... T.. 12.�► ... 3 ... .... ... .... LT. 12.0 ... 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND i LEFT O O 158 O THRU 1187 0 1191 0 RIGHT 67 O O 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 2 u .95 SOUTHBOUND 0 C► 1 EASTBOUND 2 C► .95 WESTBOUND i:► 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS .CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 704 0 516 0 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK: ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 144 0 CAPACITY 423 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A I 4 i TmotmS[�OFRgroo* r I OtV F?FSF=_AF c--" Ce:mi-EF? CFI I -T- I CAL_ MQVF MEE.r%[T- Ono hJAF. YS T C.3 E3 W :71 A V F:- / r- tr.i # 3 F; 1 • LEVEI (IF F"1 '•.'ICE. T7 SiA I t 11-:f 0 1 (111 77 CF:I I I( (al F , ►1 11111 -1 CR I I I C(;I --,1 1T9 I "- : f3lul� If�1F*���tt•iFtt ♦t 1`tt+at+t+P st+tlFMti��4ikiFti}�(. NORTHB OUND StllJ1IINiIIIII EA-Tb04JNT► WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MCI:' WII-flN MIT) WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 R. 121. T.. I:_. t.. 12. ... .... 2 T.. 1'2.!_► 1.. 12.►► 3 ... .... ... .... E-T. 12.0 ... .... 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOI.ITHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 6 49 O THRU 22 928 1154 0 RIGHT 25CO G 0 0 TRUCK'S (Y.) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 2 0 .95 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. O - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 2-7 92B 461 O LEFT C1 0 0 q LEFT TURN CHECK Mr-PT!In"l1'P,'n Sri 1-p in1l. ,.�.. - �.nf •:n r,t•r... �.,�t,r,ry CAP'AC 1 TY O 905 0 0 MOVEMENT OK OK N/A N/A RANSPI3RTAT I l3N RESEAPCH CE_N"TEF? CR 11 T I COct t__ MC7vI! i"i1=_htT ANAL_ YS 11 S X!:_::; z-3-i- Di�TI= PH1 rrL L.rillr;Esl f- I'N }*. • L EVf:I 01 `�A 1 111 'i� I 1 111 1 67 C,RITIf_N. SI11•1 1 1 L-3A NORTHBOUND SOUIH14011141, EF;5TR04IND WC=STBOIJND LANE MOV WIDTH 1110V W I I" I I I MO'.r W I D'1 H MOV WIDTH 1 . . . .... T. I (').. i t FT. 15. t ... ... . 2 ... .... 1_1. 1':. T.. . 8. !"I ... ... . 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... .., .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOI.LIMES NOPTHROUND SOUTHROUNU EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 1084 0 0 THRU 0 1.251 1157 O RIGHT 0 1"► 95 10 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL. BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .95 EASTBOUND 6 C► .95 WESTBOUND O 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEFERATION E/W :5. DIRECTI(IN SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. c_► — 99 (#FEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL_ LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 0 679 505 O LEFT c► 0 c:► O LEFT TURN CHECF: M^'--THFfIt rFlri ; lr� Et-aTF.<UUtlf1 GI7cT91X1'10 I iIPUT VOLUME 0 7 0t •- 4) U ADJUSTED VOL 11 E38 ti 0 CAPACITY O 392 U O MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A _r IR onk INA tz; F=l (3 F-,;: I- r-N _v T c__) rl's rR L=. !3 UE fA F;! (_7 V4 (—_ U_ 1*4 -r FEE M aCl: h T -1 .1 (::FaI._ M(7) M l=_ 1%1 J' F"i (-%# 1- y 113 T 4.3 MAE Pm F will [,H 1 1 owrADLE C R, I rN-61 ll/,- -11 1 4 e-s 71 f7 R I I I (il 1. i'441- NORTHBOUND (-,'(-IUI HN)l 1111 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE mov w 11.11111 NOV W 1 ) )1 H 110V W I DTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 11.0 R.. I R.. 11.0 R.. 12. 0 2 T.. I I T.. I j L,r. I I LT. 12.0 4 ... .... L. 11.0 ... .... ... .... .... ... .... 6 .... ... .... .... ... .... TRAFF 1 (7 Wlt LILIES NORTHBOUND SOUTHR01.1141) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 144 8 273 206 THRU 106J 1682 147 270 RIGHT 29 655 210 1042, TRUCi.-"S LOCAL BUSES (#/HP) PEAK HOUR FACTOP NORTHBOUND 0 .95 ....... SOOTHBOUND j O .95 EASTBOUND 4 0 .95 WESTBOUND 2 0 .95 PHASING N/S :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HFR) CYCLE LENGTH 115 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EAST BOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 601 938 225 248 LEFT 124 0 0 0 Hi �i it ...,I wbcn 11 I NPI 11 vn! LEFT -TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 144 6 273 208 ADJUSTED VOL 124 0 277 199 CAPACITY 0 461 0 MOVEMENT Ni A OK 111A N/A 4 -T"IRAmst= OF1-re'aT T. c=7h1 F CF:ESU::_FN1:;:c1-1 (: Fr_ P4TFEE IR f :R _T. `F T 1:--Ai_ PI (3 %-.,F-E MI="h!-I' (Tior.IAt__ Ys T 13 S W = A V E: ,� �� L J 1 '__, F� F) =' t4 1 _ _ S T Df= I F f l l I 1',1. 1 _014f,lpl I IV 5611JI,:fHl IOtl !-754,.s CF:ITI("(i1.. Id:'! Cf(l 7 I (;Gal F / ll '•.'[)I i3'�' :_" CRITICAL 5311H T NORTHBOUND Sn(1THI Ot 1111', FaS rL+OUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH Nov WII?TH 110V WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RTL 14. R.. 1 I . 'f RT. 13. {:► RT. 11.0 2 ... .... L.T. 11'. f ► LT. 13. Q LT. 11. 0 J. • • . • . . . • . • . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . 4 • • • • • • r • • r • • r • . • • • • • • . • • • • . • 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFF IC VOl_ UME S NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 X'► 0 25 THRU 0 109 420 1274 RIGHT 16 46 50 277 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL. BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 C) .95 SOUTHBOUND 5 f) .95 EASTBOUND 5 •95 WESTBOUND 5 •95 PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W. :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 12o SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOI..IND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 15 12C► 243 992 LEF'r 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBC'.,. INPUT VOLUME 0 2+ ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 0 0 CAPACITY 0 105 0 649 MOVEMENT OK OK OK OK. I C: F:;r 1 -11" T t:- ir-N I MF T S-3 1 L [-. 1 EVE I, fit- A-Jll,., I( i F,= CR I r .11" ()l 11 VC11 ck, I'[ I C ril F " W 1.101 CRI T J ("At- S 111-1 1. 13 1- `5 I AM.: 6E(11-1f: Tf-'i NORTHY401INT) SOU T HR01 IMP EA'F1 ROUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH Mok, w 11) 1-14 ts) I DT H MOV WIDI'H RT. 11 .0 RT. I I RT-. 12. RTL 12.0 2 LT. I I . LT. I I . 12, . 0 ... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... 4 .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 .... .... ... .... o.. .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOIJNn WESTBOUND LEFT 51 14 28 206 THRU 764 1861 32 282 RIGHT 98 59 1.31 10 TR1JCK,5 M LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 0 .95 • SOLITHBOUND 5 .95 EASTBOUND 5 co .95 WESTBOUND 5 0 .95 PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 115 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE V01-111IFS BY MOVEME-141' NORTHBOUND SOLITHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 497 Ill—,, 179 524 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN NORTHBOUND SOUTHB0I1141) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 51 14 2S 206 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 0 202 CAPACITY 0 615 0 0 MOVEMENT Ofo. m A N/A i a, T- OA -V T INI F F = --; IF f'-N F;c (7 I=- I" -r FEE F::Z %..p FE z f 7 Iml 01-1 1 1 1 1� �,N I" F` Ll 36 C R I r 1 0 1 11 `-'01 1- .1 -4 NORTHROLIND �'Al I I I I aril 1U111) EA'S I WIA4 WES rBOUND LANF MOV W t 1) T H MOV W I D I H MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH il.. 12. () ... R.. 12.0 2 r.. 12.0 .... ... .... T.. 12.0 4 ... 5 .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC NORTHBOUND SO1,1THBOLINO EASTBOUND WESTBOUND L EFT 4 J 0 0 0 THRIJ 55b 0 0 190 RIGHT 0 0 0 23 TRIJCI*,'S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND J2 0 .85 SOUTHBOUND 0 1 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 24 0 B6 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : J. 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLLJMFS BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 384 0 0 273 LEFT 15 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 41 0 o ADJUSTED VOL. 15 0 CAPACITY 687 0 MOVEMENT N/A NIA N/A N/A 86-849," 's I 1.11 I 1iESF='Ont U-, CENTEFt t" : F? t 1 1" C' i> I M M = : F%J - F Atom! FN 1 . Y S I y< 1�•i V-" 1 A �.! E. / T. ' t r=► 4 1) ! . 1 T !-i 1 A !` i F H ON PEr-41 ..., a.. VEL 01 F F VIf_E_ !- SAT I (RW I (1I4 3 x LRITIC,AI IC G CF: ] TIC. Ft1 '.!tJl. *41 -� LANE bl- .,.- NOR rHRININC� s_)uTl (1al n 1141, WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WI10 H MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH T.. 1 1. .... ... .... T.. 12.0 ,. 2 7.. 11.�� ... .... ... .... T.. 12.0 k. 3 T.. li.ci ... .... ... .... 4 ... .... ... ... .... 5 .. . ... .... ... .... ... b... .... ... .... ... ..... ... ... .... .... ... ... . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND S17I.ITHE+O(JND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND n LEFT r t k:) 0 i THRU 5�5 O O .8� RIGH1 0 O O O TRUCKS (%) NORTHBOUND 12 LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR O .85 ' SOUTHBOUND U O 1 EASTBOUND O O 1 WESTBOUND 24 0 .85 `? PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION - PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY' ; 1. Q — 99 (#PEAS/HR) ur; CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRIIICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT r: NORTHBOUND SOUTHHOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 268 O O 293 LEFT C► U tt O r 1. FF� TI "'r I • -fir: ` NGR i NbQUt•1G SOUTr+::yuUIJD EASTBOUwL WE8 ra UUNL ' INPUT VOLUME U 0 O O ADJUSTED VOL 0 U 0 . l�,� CAPACITY 687 MOVEMENT N/A O 0 N/A NtA 0 O N/A AO °� 1 TFR#=k 1=*(7)FR TFNT I C7h1 t=tES1= AF=; C CFtVTER `. C F-;! T T .1 C_- A 1_ __ 1ri U Fa WEE / I DATt_. PH 1 (+'F' "0VFP F4tl #��*iF;#t•�*itt#t+ttttt.t+F+ittittt+Y* LEVEL ('11' SE:I•:V I C'l_ E_j SAT IIE?AT 1 (II,! 56 CR I T I CAI tJ S V(11 - J 1 ' CRITICAt. E/14 VOL 6v�:`=; CRITICAI. SL1t•1 I K:► 1. 6 ���w���������*t�t�tt•tt*t**��������+�� LANE:: GE(=ihtF T F:'r NORTHBt:.EUNI) SOLITHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOO WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 ... .... T.. 12.0 R.. J2.0 ... .... 2 ... .... LT. 12.i► T.. 12.0 ... .... 3 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... @4 5 • • • . . • • • . • • . • • . • • • • • • • • • • • w • 6 ... .... ... ..•• -.. .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 0 0 0 THRU ► 64! i 620 0 RIGHT i► 0 965 0 TRUCKr ('l.) LOCAL BUSES (#/HP) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 .95 EASTBOUND 3 0 .99 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 0 371 645 0 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LTF7 T I,.: ' �! �lORT�;:Oi;�tL' SGUTHBOUND EAST'5UUi,Ib WE5 T DQL, •iL- INPUT VOLUME 0 0 0 0 ADJUSTED VOL t► 0 0 0 CAPACITY 687 0 0 0 �,c;; MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A — ,� 'Tm#c%P4 f=`ClR-TFAT r [JP4 RE= SE:onti=; f1v4 CENTEFR • CR :T -T- T T- lcNr2ol_ . Y. T 5 DAT E EX 151 f 1-1 AM PF: AI LEVEL Of IC1- 71 SAT DRAT J 014 c CRITICAL r,us vn_ CR I T I CAt E / 14 VIll. r, . CR I T I CAl_ SUM ] LANE GEOMETRY ` NORTHBOUND SOUTHHOLIND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND _ LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 •.. .... T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ... .... 2 ... .... T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... - — 3 ... .-- -... 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... - TRAFFIC VOE_UMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 26 O O THRU 0 1355 647 0 RIGHT 0 0 0 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL. BUSES (#/HR) PEAS: HOUR FACTOR -�_ NORTHBOUND 0 C► 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 O .9 EASTBOUND 4 0 .97 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 - PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION _ PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY i. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 0 579 693 O LEFT 0 0 O O E_FFT T 1 S'!:r! 17!47!'E' NOR 711& �l;;1D SCIU7ri:':i.,Lj 1D EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 26 O O ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 U 0 CAPACITY 667 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A I- F;t ots, iq q.=; [=- I ---I [=;z - r OcN -r T " P4 rR I-= !=3 trT r-N FR V-, F1 C_- FEE " -V FE F;t I C-_ r-:Z I -IF T C: #C% I P1 C-) tv? U-i- M ri-77 M -1 M e-41 YS X SS hl W 44 kJ F. Z, 1,,,j u,j k_iEll -I DAI F All Flr:A� LEVE71- CIF SATHI_,"PiT I (IN CR111CA1_, CRITICAL. F,14 I. -t CRI11CAI SUM 1 4�' i-ANF GE011E TF;"Y Ism NORTHBOUND SOLPH11011141) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH I T.. 120) ... RT. 18.0 2 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 3 T.. 12.0 ... .... ... ... .... 12.0 ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 61 0 0 0 THRU 247 0 0 154 ...... RIGHT 0 0 0 43 TRLJCV-,S LOCAL. BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 0 .96 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 5 0 .136 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 78 0 0 112 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT T17"1 �'tt7C!:' f40RT118(3iJf,JD SOUTHDOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 61 0 0 0 ADJUSTED VOL 27 0 0 0 CAPACITY 312 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A NIA N/A N..,A `T=I pWVSF't lF. TA"1- I "M FEFEE SEARCH C:Et4_rF_= M c__ .T l" T 1::A1-.. 1"1t7Vi___1"1EN-T Ah1F�1_ Y�i I S 14W 77C-1'I % P11W !� c_.I_ CIATf f: >: I `, I T tdr AM F'EAt I_PAil_ Of= SE=F;V I C L. SAT UF:AT I ((I I 22 [:RIIIC;NL N;'S VE(I_.--';=':-S CR I I I CAL E W V(71.. CR I T I CAL 'SUM l_ANF (4_:0 •i[=TF'Y NORI HROUNO 80I 11 HDO( IND EA S T tin,* D WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 ... .... RT. 1:3. k) ... .... T.. 17.0 2 ... .... T.. 12.0 ... .... T.. 10.0 3 ... .... T.. 12.0 ... .... L.. 10.0 4 T.. ... ... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... b. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 0 0 79 THRU 0 953 0 130 RIGHT 0 89 0 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL_ BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .89 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 2 0 .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEFERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. (I - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH IZ)0 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 0 323 0 70 LEFT 0 0 0 48 NORTHBOUND SOUTHDOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 0 0 79 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 0 48 CAPACITY 312 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A TRAIVS3r-CIF: TAT I c)H F=;zF: .SEARCH GENTEF;t C F=l I "l` T C F4 t_ M " V EE F" 1 E tJ T 4-N P4 1_ _ Y 1:3 I S DAT t_ E X I ': 1 I IJC: i�t•1 1-'F (11. LEVEL_ nF SAT URAT I ( itl 35 CRI TIC01 Id V01_ e— CPI TIC-61 F l,I '•'fU. (') CF., I I I CAL_ Stlt•1 E-,� LANE fiECIFIF II?'r' NORTHBOUND SOUTHDOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WID-iH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 1 :.. C► RT 3 T.. 12.C► T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... 4 L.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... SL. . 12.0 ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLI_(MFS NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 196 U U 0 THRU 1302 1 C►1 •' 0 0 RIGHT C► Ii7 0 U TRUCkS (100 LOCAL BUSES (M/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 2 G .98 SOUTHBOUND 2 t► .81 EASTBOUND 0 G 1 WEST BOUND 0 �:► 1 PHASING N/S :4. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 2. 100 — 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 115 SECO14DS .CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 496 529 0 0 LEFT 93 C► 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK; NORTHBOUND ISOU+THBOUN❑ i u . , i EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 196 0 t► 0 ADJUSTED VOL -q 7 g : ;, ., ,, :-r;*F:,, ::. , ;0 , , . _ _t CAPACITY 0 789 61 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A P? 004 P4 E3 F=C3 FZ'lr A -Ir T t7ht F:7c E7,423 F-=-- 06 FZZ C-- t-1 4-- 1—= M -V I=— M U FR T I- I C-- 44 L- Pl"WU:MtFM -V Ar,,1#cht--'veE-3 I !S t-1 I Ono m I -T' D I I I I TH(i All PEA1. LEVEL Of! 5FRY J, SAT UPAT J (114 14. CR I T I FAl. 14,, 5 1 4!!—# CF-A T I UAL [-.,, (4 ')(-Il 7, - CPA T I C01 :;!jtj L ANL (3EC NORTHBOUND SOUTHPOLIND E A S TP 0 t I N D WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH T. d ... .... ... . . . . RT. 11.0 2 T.. 1 *2'. .... . . . T.. 11.0 LT. 12.0 ... . . . . ... . . . . T.. 11.0 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 . . . . ... .... . . . . . . . ... . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOIJND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 87 0 0 0 THRU 318 0 0 153 Jmt RIGHT 10 0 0 42 TRUCKS LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 0 .86 SOUTHBOUND Q 0 1 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 3 0 .81 PHASI14G N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 2. 106 - 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 160 0 0 93 LEFT 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND cl ci-ni'ALi 1-Y 0 C31 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A ' Ir1---tAM:�F -"- F:;Z •T.A-V T C7h1 FRFSF'AF=;Z CENTE�L CCFI I I 'ItriC7v FF. Mi=_h! T AtVAL_YS T S tSY DA I F EX I c; T I NG rAM PE fif EVEI.. III ' SATtIFi�l 1 Card 21 CRITi('Al I1•'-., )(11- '. `,'h f_'F:1 T I (' i•,I. l= hJ '.'f11 1 � -ti 1 CRIT I(�i;l S(it•1 "•? 7 NOR IHBOUI-11 `.;O(ITHDOUNP EAST Hill )NC) WESTBOUND JILANE M(IV W I PT H 110%) i t I i)TH MOV W I ITTH MOV WIDTH 1 T.. 11.0 RT. 11... .... RT. 11.0 mom �. 2 I_T. 11.0 T.. 11.0 ... .... T.. 11.0 im3 ... .... ... .... ... .... l..T. 11.0 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... b... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES _- NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 19 0 0 51 THRO 137 '85 "� 120 RIGHT 68 0 77 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR _ ' NORTHBOUND • 87 '. SOUTHBOUND 3 0 .88 -_-- EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 3 0 .78 PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 12.0 SECONDS -- CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT _ NORTHBOUND SOUTHHOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 85 276 0 101 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHEa,' Fw+�. -CIL'UND SU11 i t4WC::;NJ ADJUSTED VUL 0 0 0 29 CAPACITY 0 191 0 0 MOVEMENT OK Ok: N/A N/A `fi 1�Ahl�r",F`(7F�"TAT T mm F:zESFAFtCH CEhITER T 1--:A1_ MC3k..JFEE MFh1'1" 44h1AI _.YS :T Si W 4 e-% F .,' 3 W i !_ Tom'' T '� l aMt=' I)l'- I I_ F Y I S T 1 116 i-1M PEN L I- V I= I (!I- "[ I,", ' [ (_ r r� SATIJRA T 1 (.11.1 36 CF:1 T I CAI Il , : • ''C71 --I 3 1-3 CRIT r.ICAI L/W "A'll 1 c_► 1. CP: I T I C:AI_ '�llll f, 1 9 �i1ttF +t #ttt1F� r RAMP( SOU IHDOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOO bJII?TH MOV WIDTH 1 T.. 121.i► RT. 16.0 ... .... T.. 14.0 2 T.. 12.( - T.. 12.0 ... .... LT. 11.0 3 T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... L.. 11.0 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMEE� NORTHBOUND SOUTHRIllIND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT ► 0 0 135 THRU 1028 96 0 116 RIGHT C► 11 0 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUP FACTOR NORTHBOUND 3 0 .86 SOUTHBOUNU 3 0 .76 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 3 0 •8 PHASING N/S :a. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. () - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOIIND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 451 67 0 101 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECk: it4MTFfRr.L;t'D ;000TH SOUND :EAa'' 4F":.- - IIINIDUT 'tMLLJMr 1'35 - ADJUSTED VOI. 0 0 0 141 - CAPACITY 0 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A _ I ., 8�-84C RA1'VSF~QF-C"TOct T I C3M F;ZFEE F3EAF=-tG" GENTEFz CFR I T I G441— MMWEMEt\JT Ah1A1_Y13 I S Es F I C 1--_: S T- D(',T F E):I 13 T ( I-JG AM F'EAI. LEVI-1- OF GEF,:V J CF. f-1 SAT (JF:AT I (1N CRI T ICAl- N/S VOI_ Ck J T I CAI- E /W VOI_ 1 L3 CRITICAI. S(ltl Gcc:_) 1t'Ifs*��#iFK�t�iF*iG���Y}}}}}.�c��f.*�YY��jf�F��•li LANE GEOMETRY dam NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOI.IND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. ff.!► T.. 1'.2. R.. 12.0 R.. 10.0 2 T.. 11.!_► T.. 12. T.. 12.0 RL. 11.0 3 T.. 1 1 .0 T.. 12. 0 T.. f 2. C► L. . 10.0 4 ... .... L.. 12.0 L. . 12.0 ... .... = 5 ... .... - 6 ... .... L.. 12.0 ... .... L.. 12.Co ... ... ... .. .. = TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT C► 218 241 54 THRU 1014 829 246 0 RIGHT 222 0 96 152 = _ TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 0 .86 SOUTHBOUND 1 0 .85 =— EASTBOUND 2 0 .89 WESTBOUND 2 0 .66 PHASING N/S :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 2. 100 - 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 115 SECONDS - CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 544 361 148 0 LEFT 0 121 132 37 LEFT TURN CHECK 7. CAPACITY 304 0 0 0 MOVEMENT OK N/A N/A N/A m 8�-84g►.., 4 c T�2/-'�hISF•1=lRTAT I C) F:=kESEARCF-1 CCNTEi;t GRIT I (--AL_ M C V FE P1 EE F,,l -V 0= AF%J Y S I S S h'i l Ea M I 011_44J f_ / t= t)Alh F):I5T IAPI PEA( SATU(:ial I (Jtl 30 CR I T I C44 - 1,1 %.Jnl 1 L-3 CR I T I CAL (i (J Vnl_ 7' eza i3 CF. I T I C►aL SIi11 � 4- f3 *4.yY-44641 LANE (;EFlrll-' 11_: r NORTHROUND SOUTHHOUNO EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH M(]V WIDTH MOV WIDT14 1 RT. 12. T. 1� 21.0 ... 2 T.. 12.0 ... .... T.. 12.0 ... .... 3 ... .... ... .... LT. 12.0 ... .... 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... S... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... b... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 0 126 0 THRU 294 Cr 796 a RIGHT 36 U U a TRUCK'S (%> LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 2 4 .97 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 2 G .9 WESTBOUND 0 a 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. O - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 180 0 368 0 LEFT a <r 0 in LEFT TURN CHECK !}.L,'!J VOLUME 0 it ~'t lL • �J �•r,) CAPACITY 423 O a 0 a MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 8f -s4s, .. 0 `rRAfVSPCJF;ZTAT I Oh! FcFEE SEAF 4-- 1-- MTEM C!�? I T I CAL_ MfJVEMEh1T Ah!!�L YS I S S W =_ DATE Il X 12;1 J to AM F'EAI �rt��c�}i4�iFi�*'fit+*�� �Mi*irt#�*1r*iitirf'� LEVEL. O(= S(_(_:VICE 44 SAI UR'A1 I ON 32 CRITI(_A1 VOl 1'RJTICAL_ F/W V01 A4 -4 CRITICAL SUf1 .,-�?E3 �i*���*� *��+�,�,►+� � t t t t t t �•�*,��#mot �i�*�� LANE (_E0f•lE.Tr:Y N'TITHEOl.1ND SOUTHPOLIND EAST BOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 R.. 12.t► ... .... T.. 12.0 ... .... 2 T.. 12.co ... .... T.. 12.!► ... ..... 3 ... .... ... .... LT. 12.0 ... .... 4 .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT t► t► 36 0 THRU 28 (► 1246 0 RIGHT 115 0 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAR HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 3 0 .84 SOUTHBOUND C► t► i EASTBOUND 2 t► .86 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEFERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 34 0 544 0 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK ADJUSTED VOL U 0 7 0 CAPACITY 423 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A t "�`MANSF'C7RTAT I Ohi F=tESEAiZGH GENTER' MFR' I -T- T GAi_ MOVFEE MFEE iVT AN44L_YE3 S S DAI F F Y I 51 1 Idf_= AM F'FAF x** * *au**0+++***x**+{f* LEVEE. OF SEPV I (=:E A SAT t II F;1 I fill CkI1ICAl. hlrS; VIM =' -q CF I T I CAI E/ I,1 '.'fil s -7 9 LAtJF GE OIIE I F'ti NURTHBO(IND SO[ITIABCIUNL) EA`iTFOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOv WIDTH MOO WIDTti Mc_!V WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 ... .... T.. 1�.1. 11 Rr. 15.0 ... .... 2 ... .... LT. 12. (.) T.. 11. C► ... .... 3 ... .... L . . 12.0 1.. .B.C► 4 ... .... L.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ...• .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOI.IND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT U 807 C) O THRU i 247 1276 0 RIGHT 0 c► 62 O TRUCKS ('/.) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 SOUTHBOUND 2 C► .86 EASTBOUND 6 0 .Q9 WESTBOUND 0 ►� 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIA14 ACTIVITY 1. r► — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS -CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOU14D EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT U 342 579 O LEFT O U 0 O LEFT TURN CHECK HuJUSICD VOL 0 967 O O CAPACITY 423 O O O MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A to 86-848' '' t. 86-84cad,­ c4 co TRANSr't7Fi T/a-T I C7h1 F-;: F_— F3i ono F:;7 CEh! T EF h!F ] VF= ! 1 _ 4- i,lt'TF=:TF-L f':;:r�-a1-1F--' DA I F PH 1 Of -If 'F;()k,,V n r-im i�•r i*i�cii*++++i+i•�+;�+- «+++:+*++� *ice LFVF.I_ 01- CF E=i SraT I1RAT 1 (ifj $6 CR T T I CAL N ,'!, VOI '? 4-3 CRITICAL L /W VIA 'f�- I;RITI "AI_ '301.1 f_-)�t-:r LANE GE(►MI_TI=;Y NORTHBOUND SOUT HP0111JE) EAS f BOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 T.. 12.C► ... .... ... .... R.. 12.0 2 T.. 12.4:1 ... .... ... .... T.. 12.0 3 L. 12.0 ... .... .... ... .... 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... :5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC Vol. LIMES NORTHBOUND SOU'fHFOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 97 s:► i► 0 THRU 640 C► O 202 RIGHT 0 0 0 23 TRUCKS LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUNDI 12 C► .95 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 24 U .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 396 0 O 263 LEFT 82 r:► 0 0 NORTii60UND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTFIUUND INPUT VOLUME 97 0 O 0 ADJUSTED VOL 82 0 0 0 CAPACITY 687 0 0 0 Mn,JG'raf=tlT h1/ r•i F: /". "Ir ., P! SG-8`tt 4 r F:;z e-A r-,i !=-,, i— v.) v;z -r fco -r i 13 i-,i F� E: !=---y F=- onk F:< (-- 1-4 CEh1 - r e: 14t F:;: t -1 1 iff4 L__ 1-1 c') RN/ FF 1-1 FF 114 -1 fl� rNj I N, C-3 T SE2, r___ I AVF= T 7 i7zi(l1 1*1 IA F=:;: IC4 1-1 1=1 PA f F PH I f-;Fflllfl")Fll 10 1. [7VEI jjj7- SAI I f 1011 32 CRITIC AI H/!- C kA T I C L E / 0 OI E-4 =-v CR'l I 1(-Al- SUl'i t:5 LANE GF(ItAL TRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHROUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 T'.. 11.0 . . . T.. 12.0 2 T.. I I . () . . . . . . . T . . 12. 3 T.. 11.0 .... ... 4 .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEF Y 0 0 0 0 THRU 695 0 0 416 RIGHT 0 0 0 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 12 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 0 WESTBOUND 24 0 .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERAT10N PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 300 0 0 2B5 LEFT 0 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 0 0 0 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 0 0 CAPACITY 687 0 0 0 "i` F� A tV *--_, F`• t-11=;: T A T T In IV F-i F 3 FF FLh F� If:3' F-4 C71 IV T" F F; CFI C T I C- ItN I._ M(IVF-:MFI-J-7 AhJoCkI__Y1 !=3 1%,11C I F--VIA 1=i i(-N M F • ,. ilAl E PH I of f T-TIVi II a- M `�:' 1��c+t*i!•�ir�+�i�+4�c�,.+�*yip+.��•►�+.«�.,.��+ LEVEL OF SL'f- L' l C E A Al I lk"' T I i IN 3 d, t �. LRI 1 ICAI VCu. � _-:�-�5 x LANE. GEOME. T R e NORT HBOUND SOUTHPUI 1141) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 ... .... T.. 1�.Cc R.. 12.0 ... .... _ 2 ... .... LT. 12.0 T.. 12.(. 3 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... S .. ... ... ... .... ... .. ... .... b... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND =_ LEFT 0 {l 0 0 THRU ► 640 620 0 RIGHT 0 965 0 _- TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 12 c_l .95 1 SOUTHBOUND 0 Cl I EASTBOUND 0 0 1 l WESTBOIND 24 0 .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS;HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 0 335 620 p LEFT 0 a NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 O O G ADJUSTED vni_ n f► c� 7 MOVE NEN f N/A N/A N/A N/A • "''� �iaT b .s _r F;t 04 M E3 1--` C3 F=<- -r ock -F I M t%J F;Z FEE F; e: fcw F::Z C7 " I-- EE r,14 -r E: M F::Z T -V I U_. 414 L_ M(7W I=-- PI IF P4 -V M 0--N L - 'V 17-3 1 T=3 P4 E 2! oLN q%/ F7Z I f-3 I-) I- VT- V 4 FZZ A m F=* D AT F F'll t 6F'F'F_flV(- r? i-4M 4 449 LEVF-L OF !3FF-:Vl(-',F- c SATURATION 76 CRTTICAL N-'S V(11- 6t 4 7`1 CAI- SLIM I-ANE GE(_l1ll-lF:Y NORTHBOUND 301-1 THBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH mov wir)TH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 2 T.. 121.0 ... .... 3 . . . . . . . LT. 12. () . . . .... 4 ... .... ... .... .. .... 5 ... .... ... ... 6 .... ... .... ... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 26 0 0 THRU 0 1580 671 0 RIGHT 0 0 0 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 .95 EASTBOUND 4 0 .97 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 0 640 719 0 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHSOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 26 0 0 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 0 0 CAPACITY 687 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A - � y \. `�LAhISh'CIRTAT I MN RI=-SjEAF;Z CEIVTFF;t _ GR I T I CAL_ M"kvPE1" IEINI_F Oct I'll f-NL_ YS 15 ' DATE F'Fi I r,F'C-'I•;(:1VEI1 i4M lYl r LEVEL OF SEf- V I (_:E f`r SATURATION CRITICAI._ N /S VOI" r� 2,-, CRITI('ii l_ E,14 CR I T I CAI SLIM �?,°,�: iF�F�1FiFiF#�Y�1i�*1•a*ii*ii i� �! Y t * i#s* #��x�iF�F*�4 = LANE GEONE TRY NORTHBOLND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH R - 1 T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... RT. 18.0 a2 T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... T.. 12.0 3 T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... ... .... 4 LT. 12.0 ... .... ... .... ... .... � 5 ... .. ... .... ... ... .... b TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 61 O O 0 . THRU 322 O 0 249 • R I GHT 0 0 0 80 TRUCE'S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 0 .96 SOUTHBOUND 0 C► 1 y z EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 5 0 .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS gx, CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 99 O O 169 LEFT 0 0 O 0 x LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND �F INPUT VOLUME 61 0 O ADJUSTED VOL_ 27 0 0 O CAPACITY 312 0 0 O Vol MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A V6 "1 `rMANSF= OF7TAT' I ON F?F_SEAF:;Zf__" CEhlT1—=M CFc I T T CAl_._ t•'10�.J'F=h'tElVT' AhlF-al_YS ? S h! tAJ 4, 5 T DAI E FN 1 AF -='ROVED AM LEVEL. OF SERVICE /A SATURAT I ON 34 CRIT1CAI N'S VOl_ —1 '�=3 c R: I I I C; r; I (= i lit GRIT ICAI. SUM LANE GFOMETF: r NORTHFAIUND SOUTHPOI.1Id1) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH I ... .... RT. 13.C► ... .... T.. 17.0 2 ... .... T.. 12.i► ... .... T.. 10.0 3 T.. 121.i► ... .... L.. 10.C► 4 ... .... T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 0 0 137 THRU 0 1615 0 175 RIGHT 0 89 0 0 TRUCKS ('1.) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK; HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .95 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 2 0 .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 0 498 0 88 LEFT 0 0 0 113 LEFT TURN CHECK: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 0 0 137 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 0 113 CAPACITY 312 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A �• -s # ,• r .: j. . 3 rzt omb Im t.=-3 r— m Fc _r oc% _v I "" r:;: F=- -._3 F=- #A F:;. f_- " (-- r_= m -r 1=— F< F:? T -F- T F_-, onk I _. M (73 1" U-- INJI T ock IrA i'-% I N1, S I E3 L-:t F:;;r T ll� I- F7 I... I_ %,,, f -, F . 17 !:___l _r DAME PH 1 OFTI-AIVE F) f4 M LEVEL nF SE: I T (-T SA,rtlkf- l 1 Cij,t --?$,_ti CR I f I Crit N !L Alt. 7173 cl-I CkI T I CAl E 14 VO I ,fl -3 LANE GEUh1ETR NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH I RT. 12. 0 X. I)- RT. j . ( .1 ... .... R.. 12. Cl 2 T.. 12.( T.. 12.. 0 ... .... RT. 12.0 3 T.. 12. T.. 12. cl ... .... T.. 12.0 4 L.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... 5 L.. 12.0 ... o.. ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... ... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND, WESTBOUND LEFT 425 cl 0 0 THRU 1369 1220 o 105 RIGHT 220 166 0 16 TRUCKS M LOCAL BUSES (*/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 2 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .95 EASTBOUND 0 0 .95 WESTBOUND 0 0 .95 PHASING N/S :4. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) E/W' :5. DIRECTION SSPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2. 100 - 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 115 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 637 554 0 46 LEFT 232 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHROUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 425 0 0 0 ADJUSTED VOL 443 Q rAPnCTTY I C? 96-s-S49' "1`�2ANSPOFtTAT I QN f�ESEAt�CH CENTER CR I T 1_ CAL_ MQVI=MEN 7- ANAL YS I^._.s DATE f'li 7 (it_I._(_��JAE:l1_F ►,M ����iRiF�i **�Y* 3 ii� ** it � * � his K #*� * •M** * � LkVEL nr= SATIJRAT ] ( IN 28 CRITI(-AI N/S V01 -4f� CR]TIC;AI F/W V01 'e_3c5 CR I T I CAt SUN Z- I 1 �aaw�riy.Yi{ia:. .:.w M.i. +.. �.:la a. aw •. ���wi w•L� • LANE. GE011F "f F,Y NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOIND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV W I T) FH MOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH I T.. 1 "_. O ... .... ... .... RT. 1 1.0 2 T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... T.. 11.0 3 LT. 12.0 ... .... ... .... T.. 11.0 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 166 0 O 0 THRIJ 503 O O 48B RIGHT G 0 O 159 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (M/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND O 0 1 EASTBOUND O 0 1 WESTBOUND 3 0 .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 2. 100 — 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 246 0 0 265 LEFT 0 0 O O LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 166 G O 0 ADJUSTED VOL 151 0 O O CAPACITY 0 789 61 O MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 'fii?�4NS{-'ORTAT I "m F:ESEAFRCH CENTER 't CF2 I T ? f1`AL. P• "vr---= MEm-r AMAL_YS I S f SW !;2 if -IN wFf / Fly w 7 T r1F'F'F,% ..►',1F F) AM I_FVE=L. OF r-4 SAT IRit tTIOW 37 �K t-RITTCAI. N/S, Vtal_ ZI Cf=:1 T I CAI_ F f W VOI. (_RITICOL. ';lih1 **a.* *i+Mi* **M**}Y{f*#* � I. �►�F � �Ec rlriF= rf�: v NORTHFI(IUNU tiOUTFtF{OUND EA:3-rNOIIND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 T.. 11.(I RT. 11.6 ... .... RT. 11.0 2 LT. 1 1 . (o T.. 1 1. o ... .... T.. 11. o z-•• ...• .•• •... LT. 11.C► -_ 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... .... ... — 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... .... ... .... TRAFF J C VOLUMES NORTHBOUNDSOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND - LEFT 19 tl 0 J5 THRU 405 636 0 472 -� RIGHT 0 70 O 152 _ TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAS: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 O .9S SOUTHBOLIND 4 0 .95 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 5 0 .95 PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER 'TURN PROTECTED - E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. U - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS - CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHROUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 235 403 0 256 LEFT 0 0 0 O LEFT TURN CIHECk. NORTHBOUND SOUTHHOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 19 0 0 55 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 y _ = CAPACITY O 168 0 0 4 MOVEMENT OK OKI N/A N/A TRANSF'"FRT'A'T I "M rR FEE SEAFR[::: 1 CFEE NTEF? CF7 I T I CAI_ MCiVi= MEhlT AtVAI _YS I $ S !7 t4 J ­', -T / i c� 7:� rz;." PFi TE: f 'IA I 0J-"f"H'•JE'Ci iiht 1_EVEI_ (JF :,f;f :'.' I CE F t SAT I!f•:A1 1 Pt so CR I T I C'61. H 5 '•'Cti 1_3 1 U-3 C-11 1 T I (,AI F_ - W ':'(( 1 X4 c? C R I T IC'(;I "111.1 "? • 'jG ji �Fa }�cY�ki.. r.*.+r rJc 41 ..!.-b.r i-bl W4 yY..K. • LANE b_EO 1f:Tf-•i i RAW SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH 110V WIC)TH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH IT.. i L. ► PT. 16. CI ... .... 1'.. 14. 0 2 T.. 12'. G T.. 1',. 1'1 ... LT. 11.0 3 T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... L.. 11.0 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFF l C' VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 0 0 202 THRU 1913 96 0 214 RIGHT 0 19 0 0 TRlJCk;S T Z) LOCAL BUSES (# /HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND C► •9.9 SOUTHBOUND .95 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 3 0 .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPLKATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. �► - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL_ LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 76C► 58 0 149 LEFT 0 C► (1 O LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 0 0 2.02 - ADJUSTED VOL C► 0 0 195 CAPACITY 0 221 O 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A TF?A14SF'(3FcTAT I nt-j F:;zIr.SEAF:CH CEt4TEf;z CFi T T I CAL_. MC)wF=mF=- m T AhJAI-YE3 I S DA FF F'IA J (?('('f7(JVE D raM LEVEL OF 5FFlA'ICI:. t7 SATC.IRAT 1 (lid Q=3 +. -:f',, C'RITIC01 Ili (- 'JC�I.:- CRITICAL F.14 %'Ui 4�'_;61 2 CRITICAL SUM i. I..ANF GFOMHTRr NORTHBOUND? SOUTHROUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 11.0 T.. 12. R.. 12.0 R.. 1 ►.O 2 T.. 11.Q T.. 12.0 1.. 12�.0 RL. 11.0 3 T.. 11.0 T.. 10 1'.. 12.0 L.. 10.0 4 ... .... L.. I(I L.. 12.�► ... .... 5 ... .... L.. 1:.0 L.. 12.0 ... .... _— 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... _ TRAFFIC: VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT C► 247 490 179 - THRU 1141 856 0 RIGHT :,91 0 542 365 ."� TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAS: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 1 0 .95 EASTBOUND 2 U .95 WESTBOUND 2 0 .95 PHASING N/S :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED _ 1� E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2. 100 - 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 115 SECONDS r CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 616 398 482 O LEFT 0 125 271 174 -- LEFT TURN CHECk:: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 247 490 179 ADJUSTED VOL 0 240 517 166 CAPACITY 345 0 0 0 MOVEMENT OK N/A N/A N/A v } om TRAhiSPORTAT I FtFEE SFEE ARCF-i CENTER CR I T T CAt_ Mt3�lEf''lE�t'T' �hIAE__. YS I S S M I A R"'1 T £3 S -1- DATF: PH I AFF'ROVED ON L_EVEI- OF 6E-FV I CE C: SATURAI I HN (35 CRITICAL N/S VCII- ^99 CRITICAL E/W VOI t3'7C:10 CRITICAL SUM 9 •� ��Y�.. � �►ai.� • � �.. • • « . - . �. �. ..� tom.. �. •a r♦ �♦ LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 12.0 ... .... T.. 12.0 ... .... 2 T.. 12.0 ... .... T.. 12.0 ... .... 3 ... .... ... .... LT. 12.0 ... .... 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EFT O 0 190 0 HRU 496 t► 2058 0 IGHT 38 0 0 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 2 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND t► 0 1 EASTBOUND 2 0 .95 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS IRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 299 0 870 LEFT 0 C► 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 0 190 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 180 CAPACITY 423 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A WESTBOUND 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 N/A cm-949 "r P--t Ot% P4 E-3 V— " FZ -Y't--N I T ID IV C-� 1-= SEARCH (_1F-:-- P4 -T- FEE F;Z 441 r-- F; Z I -1 I CMC]Wt _ME.M I- 1:3, I- EVEN_ OF 4'f .'T SA1 111-:07 (i 111 67 CR I I I I CR. IT I C01 1 W- U 4. + Y. 4- A.. t, I L T FA' NOR I'll WAIN 1) S OLJ T I A W3 (114 F) Erisi Finuin) WESTBOUND LANC Mov WIDTH 11()v 1411,1111 MW WIDTH 110V WIDTH T.. I ... .... 2 T.. 12.0 T. 12.0 4 5 6 TRAFFIC VOLUMES fi NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 6 36 0 THRU 2B 386 212(7.) 0 RIGHT 3314 0 0 0 TRUCl`S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 .95 SOUTHBOUND 4 .95 EASTBOU14D 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 5 .95 PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PRorEC1ED E/W :5. DIREC,riori SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 30 422 779 0 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TIJR14 CHECt:"' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 6 36 0 ADJUSTED VOI 6 0 CAPACITY 0 392 0 0 MOVEMENT OK OK N/A N/A ficimidt r-10049 '°rMANSF MF;ZTAT I ON RE SFEE Ar-<(I', CENTEFz r C-F? I L. YS I S xd DATE. F-'H l AFFF=- VE I', AM LEVEI_ fJF Cf 1.)jCf (: .,,'. SATURAI I (IN 07 ,.: CRITIGAI td%� VOl_ '�=.-'f:3 CRITICAL E/W Vl)I F_-3 7f� CR I T I CAI_. 5(Jrl .1. 4 LANE GEOMF TF-l:Y NORTHBOUND SOlilHROUND EASTS06ND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 ... .... T.. l Co. 1-1 RT. 15. 0 ... .... 2 ... .... LT. 12.(:1 T.. 11.0 ... .... -- 3 ... .... L.. 12.0 T.. .8.0 ... .... 4 ... .... L.. 12.0 ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... - b ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... - TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 14-,!:6 0 0 THRU 0 3_.0 1604 O RIGHT 0 0 62 0 - TRUCKS ('L) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .95 EASTBOUND b 0 .95 - WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : J. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 0 528 676 0 LEFT 0 0 0 0 - LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND*' EASTBOUND WESTBOUND — INFU!' VOLUME 0 1436 0 0 - ADJUSTED VOL 0 1585 0 0 -� CAPACITY 423 O O O _= MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A ® , Offk` _r FR A P4!-3 F— C) VR -r ock -r I " M F< EF --, V- A F< U_ " CV M r 1—= F:Z (::: -T I (-- onk L_ m ( I w F____ m 1-:-, r-4 _r o!!:N M 44 1 *V' E-3 F F.3 P4 1 44 No-* F:-- /I I - c:�* 7 v P-1 VI F� - r F—f F7< e-A 1-1 F* DA I F F14 1 (al .1_0tWlpl F 011 4- IEVEI Vif: !AA.,", I C,f- 0(_l SAI 1.4-:4 0 1 (it 1 41 CRJI TC(il ti 1 7.4-7 CRITH-Al 511M 7 q, LANE 5F.ONE: TI-I'1 NORT111401 1140 SPI JTH[l0[ IND HASTBDUND WESTBOUND LANE mov W11,11-H MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH IT.. 12. to ... .... ... R.. 12.0 2 T.. 12.4o ... .... ... T.. 12.0 3 12.() ... .... ... 4 .... ... .... ... 5 ... .... ... .... ... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 104 0 0 0 THRU 706 0 0 233 RIGHT 0 0 0 23 TRUCKS LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 12 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 24 0 .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : I �O SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 436 U 0 304 LEFT 91 0 0 0 LEFT TUR14 CHECK NOk i hriw�LjfiD 6OUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WES7BOUND INPUT VOLUME 104 0 0 0 ADJUSTED VOL 91 O 4:) 0 CAPACITY 667 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A NIA N/A Ir F:k O=k M !-:; V, " F-.c -T 44 T- I " M FRESE_AF-NCH CENTEFc CFI I -r T T Dal f-- fli I (AM Lt-VEL (A SAT( IF,,'(-)T I 0H GRITICAl. N/F, 'Alt 7; .1 —IT, CRITICAL. 51.1ri LANE GLOMEIRt NOR1 HL40UNI So(ITIAPOUND FASTBOUNn WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 3 T.. 11.0 ... .... ... .... T.. 12.0 2 T.. 11.0 .... ... .... T.. 12. 0 3 11.0 ... ... .... ... 4 ... .... ... .... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT THRU 768 0 0 503 RIGHT 0 0 0 0 TRUa-'S LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 12 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 0 1 WESTBOUND 24 .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENa,rH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 331 c) 0 344 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND, EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 0 0 0 CA ADJUSTED VOL (1 CAPACITY 687 0 0 0 0 0 0 � MOVEMENT N/A N/A NIA N/A ' 1rFZAN�1-- "FrTA-U I CAN F=cF19I-=-0 CF=P4 TER CR T -V I (:�AI•_ MC)FEE- M1= N 1- ANA1 _YS :I S N F Oct V 1= / 1 _- "? '.=, 114 (31z-;' T` 1-f F AI.1014441._I AM +fix r�«+i*Y. LEVEI Of ' E f:VII_F C SAT (IR07 I UN 69 CRI iCAI. t114 vni. 411 1 1 • CR I I I CAL SUM 1. !i C.D. LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOLINf) SouTHPnUNr) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 ... .... T.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 ... .... 2 ... .... LT. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ... .... 3 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... b... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 0 0 0 THRU 0 710 807 0 RIGHT 0 0 965 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (# / HR) PEAk:: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 3 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 .95 EASTBOUND 3 O .99 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 (MPEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS kRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 0 411 839 0 LEFT 0 ri 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK: - NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 0 0 0 - ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 0 0 CAPACITY 687 0 O O ®_ MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A TF?#C%NSF= C=iF?TAT I t-3h1 Fr<EEaEAF;zCH CENTEF;r CFR I T" T CAL MC3 EEr 1:= NT APJAI_. Y S I S NE t AVE! T t?7--f ( ?1_JT1-4 FtiAh'FF= DATE-. PH 1 L_EVEI_ OF SATI)F;:AT I ON so CRITICAL N �; Y01 CRITICAL_ 5)1JN J 4•_'e---> LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHROUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH — 1 ... .... T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ... .... 2 ... .... T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... 3 ... .... LT. 112.0 ... .... ... .. 4 ... .... ... -_ 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 26 4 0 oik THRU 0 1650 717 O - R I GHT 0 O 0 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL RUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 0 .95 EASTBOUND 4 Cl .97 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) — CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 0 668 76B O LEFT 0 0 O 0 LEFT' TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUIHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 26 O O _- ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 O O C10 CAPACITY 687 O O 0 _ MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A lo�\ t5�98 C TRAhJSF'"F,TAT T [phi ME SFEE AVRC-- --1 CENTFf:;t /o% tr' FL;z I..'r I t A I_ M Jj V Fz : r'J F= M' T eA RJ A L _. Y S I S N W =ti /-4 V F=-" " INJ L-J b S I_ DAT F F'H 7 AI_1.01A)AI-+1_ E" AM LEVEL OF SEkY l CE !=4 SAT UR(AT I UN 17 I�RIT ICAI. N,"S '•Jni I C ) CR I T I CAL SUM LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOIJTHPOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 T.. 12. () ... .... ... .... RT. 16.0 ' 2 T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... T.. 12.0 3 T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... ... .... 4 LT. 1.2.0 ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND ( ` LEFT 61 0 0 0 THRU 332 0 0 265 RIGHT 0 0 0 115 TREJCKS (%> LOCAL. BUSES (#/HR) PEAR: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 0 .96 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND O 0 1 WESTBOUND 5 0 .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 102 0 0 195 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 61 0 0 0 ADJUSTED VOL 27 O O 0 .gay CAPACITY 312 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A . N/A W-'fj49 -rMombN!3FPC7F7TAT I (3h11 F;ZESEAFICH aF=NTEF;Z C� I "T T t�Al_ hi('3VFt"IF NT ANAL YS I E3 DATE 1:41 1 ALLOWABLE AM - LEVEL OF CE F:V I CE env _ SAT URAT I ON 36 J CR I T I CAC. fV / }' VOL _ CRITICAL (SUM cS A y , — LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH i... .... RT. 13.0 ... .... T.. 17.0 2 ... .... T.. 12.0 ... .... T.. 10.0 — 3 ... .... T.. 112.0 ... .... L.. 10.0 -- _e 4 ... .... T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND _ LEFT O O 0 137 THRU 0 1722 0 191 •- RIGHT 0 89 0 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL. BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 0 1 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .95 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 2 0 .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 0 529 0 96 LEFT 0 0 0 113 LEFT TURN CHFCk: - NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 0 0 137 ADJUSTED VOL. 0 0 0 113 - ClACITY 312 0 0 0 �•.' MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 6 fie-98 CA i`RAEVSPf.7F "1 A 1- I C31%,! E:;:F_SE= AF-�C" I.�Imo.h!"7" ,F� CF-<I -F 1- F__ r-1f3VF MC--hd`F- AMONI _N" I. S Df;l 1= f-'H 1 i.l _Ob1RPl l=. ��h1 SH-Flik"I ION 4-3 CRTTICAI. N/5 VOL 4=? ...y CFI I T I Cal . E i W VOL 4 E3 CR1T ICAL tAll1 97 5 1 iF�FIF�Fi��►i��F�i�1t�F�t�*��!� +FM � i� iF��it��f*1! �F���*i! LANE: GEOM(- TF.:Y NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 12. 0 RT. I,.,. R.. 12. o 2 1'.. 12.0 T.. 12.6 ... .... RT. 12.0 3 T. 12.0 T.. 12.C► ... .... T.. 12.0 4 L_.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... 5 I_.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... ... .... b... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT' 490 0 0 0 THRU 1558 1376 0 111 RIGHT 231 201 0 17 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 2 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .95 EASTBOUND 0 0 _ .95 WESTBOUND 0 0 .95 PHASING N/S :4. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 2. 100 - 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 115 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 716 632 0 48 LEFT 271 0 01 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 490 0 0 0 ADJUSTED V01.. 517 C► 0 0 CAPACITY 139 G 0 0 MCI :'EMF_NT N / A M / A r1; GV8- 98 #:NfVSF="tJPoe -1'AT I C_ltV RESE= AI-tCH t :FN-1"ER .0 tF N-v AIVAI__. YS :i S t=; -1, 10 IF Pik 1 i-�I I (1b ('Api F r41 I_E-VF1 (IF 5111"DICE A SAT (.)r::i�T IfiN 42 CIR I T I C Al 3U11 '7.7 1 I i,tJF" i�EOt1ETf�'Y NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND I.ANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH i T.. 12.0 ... 2 T.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... T.. 11.0 3 L. T . 12. ... .... ... .... T .. 11. c� 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUNn SOUTHROUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND -- LEFT 298 i ► 0 0 THRU 787 0 0 682 RIGHT 0 0 0 211 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#1/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 .95 SOUTHBOUND 0 O 1 EASTEOI-IND 0 O 1 ! WESTBOUND 3 O .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 2. 100 — 599 (#IPEDS/HR) — CYCLE LENGTH 115 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 405 i► 0 366 LEFT 0 O LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 298 0 0 0 ADJUSTED VOL 297 0 n 0 CAPACITY 191 Ci p _® MOVEMFNT IJ/A N/A N/A N/A „ S -849 -rMf=%Ncf3F>"FR-rn-rX"M F;7E:E3e:nM(_—" C::E:M-rf_=M -7 f=; V DATE PH I i'd 1_014iA01 F N'l 49 * * # * + LEVEI_ OF f;[7 1 1 V I SATURW 1 (01 49 Cril TICAI 4 cri I'l I c- iil 51 It I $_t • LANE fiEOMF T R Y NORTHRO11ND SOLITHROUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH mot) WIDTH mov WIDTH mov WIDTH I T.. I I . () Rl. 1 1. (1 RT. 11. 0 2 L.T. 11.0 T.. 11.0 1.. 11.0 3 .... LT. 11.0 4 ..v .... 5 ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC' VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT I'? Q 74 THRU 447, 796 0 729 RIGHT i-► 72 0 1-01 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 0 .95 SOU'r HBOUND 4 .95 EASTBOUND 0 CI 1 WESTBOUND 5 0 .95 PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 (#F,EDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 257 496 0 386 LEFT 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECV: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 19 0 0 74 ADJUSTED VOL 0 4:1 4*1 51 CAPACITY 0 239 0 0 MOVEMENT OK OK N/A N/A 8 G - 8 499 m -'RAN! V-"(J1:;7 TA'T' T C]N F-:FSE:3EAf-?C.1-1 CI=_N TFF:Z C1=a T 'T 1 (-'fLNL_. M C-3 WI—Ef"F_7MI- ANlaL_ "yC:3 t D« i f: I-'I� 1 F-ll I (:11lFNf�l L- iat•1• #i��f�i�,c�!��***+�tt+�a��f i***�i� ►fit*Y� '.;F11 1 1I:fa1 I I:II 1 70 CR 1 T T (: i+I Jf.j�t}tf+}Yt*f�i-*.Y *w**+.+r**Yaws YYiiXi .Yi LANE GEJIf•1F I F. i i 90 RAMP SOI ITHE+OI IND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 T. 1'.. ► R1 . 16. ... . • .. T.. 14.0 2 T.. 1:'. T.. 12. ... ... .... LT. 11.{, 3 T 12.0 ... .... ... .... L.. 11.0 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFF: I C: V01.. UME S NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 (1 c,► 271 THRU 2 3%59 9d ►:► 264 RIGHT 0 25 C► 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND .. 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 3 0 .95 EASTBOUND 0 0 1 WESTBOUND 3 i► .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 937 61 C► LEFT 0 t7 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 +? 0 _ ADJUSTED VOL. 0 C► 0 — CAPACITY 0 392 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A WESTBOUND 203 0 WESTBOUND 271 274 0 N/A • aLL � -r F;Z#n !4r5H'113R-r-A-V I otV t:;ZEc;FEE AF:;: 1_-:LEE rJ-rF F;t C�c TM17VF ME:tV-!" WIVAI___Y`3 I S DEN rE PH I iiLIA11414l E All iFik*#iF•►act*iF**�:;�r#`asit*+act+���*# aY+cYi I_ EVEL OF f kV 1 (_ I t UPITILfif. IA-4. 1-3_-'.-1 rr- I T I CAI E_ i ICJ 01 i y_ t CF'ITICAL SUM 1 `_7j46 LANE GEC11•11-TR'r NORTHROUND SO(ITt K)UNP F_ASTPOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 11.0 T.. I '21.+_+ R.. 12.0 R.. 10.0 -� 2 T.. II T.. T.. I2.0 RL. 11.0 3 T.. 11. T.. iL'.�'T.. 12.0 L. 10.0 4 ... .... L. . 12 . (:) L.. 12. C) ... .... 5 ... .... L.. 12.0 L.. 12.C► ... .... -- 6 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 0 260 520 198 THRU 1-343 1 169 916 0 RIGHT 402 0 753 402 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK' HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 1 0 .95 EASTBOUND 2 0 .95 WESTBOUND 2 0 .95 PHASING N/S :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W. :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 2. 100 - 599 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 115 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 701 455 516 0 LEFT 0 133 288 196 LEFT TURN L:HECE NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 260 520 198 ADJUSTED vnt_0 nqr CAPACITY 379 4_i ;� 0 MOVEMENT OK, N/A N/A N/A TF;tAME31='ClR'f"AT I C3 M RI_ESEARC.'H CENTER CR I T I C':l41.._. m "wFEt"1F=htT AhtAl.__YE3 I. S c3 M 10--a m T. A %.l F_= i i=i C= T' DAi E F='N t r"al_ I.014EaF�l _F f;M 1_EVEI_ Of SAT I P ,ol 1 OH CRITICAL P -`5 VnI_ -If-F:3 CRITICAL EiI-J VOI_ 1 1 1 c� CR I T I CAI SI)rt I 61� i-i►Y.ca•a.►�:a�.�+.... sY �sM�.+.. a. i.is... +. ♦1r1�iY Y< LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHPOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH I RT. 12.0 ... .... T.. 12.c► ... .... 2 T.. 12.0 ... .... T.. 12.0 ... .... 3 ... .... ... .... LT. 12.0 ... .... 4 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... b... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT U 0 285 0 THRU (322 0 2601 0 RIGHT 47 0 0 0 TRUCk:S (%) LOCAL RUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 2 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 1 EASTBOUND 2 0 .95 WESTBOUND 0 0 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS ,CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 4813 0 1119 O LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 0 285 0 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 2137 0 CAPACITY 423 0 0 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 5�-84� Opp, I -ir F;t 0b 11-11 3F=O (7) r-c 11' ttl§ -ir I C3 M F::Z F= !-3 F—:7 tA F:;C ( -:,' V 4 (:: EZ P4 -lr EF F;t (—I r-Ic r I t U1oc% L 111r11 C3 q%lp F__. m FL [NJ T ollb r\i I... ly C—=; I IE3 i _:; L-i :7; l(A R.-Y F� -1 i: -; tAy 14 5_; Dry 11* 114 1 61 1 014-41-0 1-- 111 40 -0 -b * 0 0 4- Y -44 r f -9 -6 * * 4- 6' 41 E VF I OF I ;I- I r I SA 111[4.4 i I I lt,j 87 ("R I'T I if 14 ')fjl ­0 CR I T I ('s "'lill I i ANL 1: jMF R WIR1 HF.'OHNI'l 0(114417) WF5 14TSOUND LANE mov WIDTH M 0 IAJ I OT H HOY W I U) I H MO-V WIDTH I R. T.• 1 '42 C► . .. . . . . Lr. 112. ... .... 4 ... ... .... 5 ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... 6 ... ... .... ... .... ... .... TRAFFIC VOt fJMFS NORTHROI IND SOUTHBOUND EAST801.11-11) WESTBOUND 1. EFT 1) 6 36 6 THRU 128 2 7 (7) 2 RIGHT 497 TRUct-t�--cr.v­ "I OLAL. BUSES (#/HR) PEAK �6F HOUR FACTOR NORTHB13UND 3 0 .95 SOUTHBOUND 0 EASTBOUND 2 1 .95 WESTRO(IND u 0 PHASING N/S :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 CYCLE LENGTH 120 SECONDS ctRi rICAL -v_44k.JE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NOR THBOLJ14D SDLirHBOLJNI)--------. EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 3c) 500 69 0 LEFT 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTbQ4x,1I) INPUT VOLUME 7,6 6 cl 0 AI)JUSTED VOL 470 CAPACITY OK N/A N/A MOVEM-ENT OK ' x motN N isF-(3F:;:'T"!aT r pm F;zESEAs<t-- Ce7P4-rER I T 'T_ C:A1. 1'•iC7VF MENT ANAL_ YS I S w 'ell l(A I _ : 1-=; t,*J 1-r f-; U IlATf PH I 01-1111,3011F AM ,. 14�1f+►#IFY IF J+i+�x.fi**x}xi++xi+a.�r t'Y�+c+ r, ' LEVE:1 ill '_FI<'JICI I? _ SA1 1 il-;f'; I 1 i UJ 80 ck,171Cf,41 F W Vfi1 7!3 +a.•.r.••a r+.r •.:♦r....r.. •.ems. -air• :if'F L�ru IFC1r1E= 1 i?4 j NCINIHBO(.INI► S(1tifliltCtlJtrrl Ers-TscIIra? WHS'lr+OtIND LANE MCI' WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIIII H MOV WIDTH Rl . l�. t! ... ... . ' 2 ... .... I..I. ly.�.� T. I I . 0 3 ... .... T. . . 8 . Ci .. . 4 ... .... L.. 12.0 ... .... ... .... = 5 ... .... .. .... ... .... ... ... h... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... T RAFF I [. VOL IJMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHDOUND F.ASTNOUIdD WESTBOUND - LEFT ! i 1 B55 0 N THRU 0 :.99 182B �> RIGHT 0 62 O TRUCKS (%) LOCAL RUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 0 L► 1 -_ SOUTHBOUND 2 C� .95 EASTBOUND 6 t i .95 - WESTBOUND t:► i ► 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION E/W :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION =_ PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. <'► - 99 (#PEDS/HR) - CYCLE LENGTH 12C► SECONDS �r CRITICAL LANE VOL. 111E S BY 11OVEMENI - . NORTHBOUND SOLI fHBOUNG EASTBOUND WESTBOUND - - ' THRU -RIGHT (.1 677 768 0 LEFT Cl i► p 0 LEF1 TURN CHEC V. NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOIJND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND I Nt'(JT VOLUME 0 1855 0 O ADJIJSTED VOL. (1 20 - y CAPACITY 423 D 0 0 = MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A 8-849