Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-86-0996J-86-1048 12/4/86 ■ I KI RESOLUTION NO. 86-9961 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE PAYMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF SEVENTEEN THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED AND SIXTY-SEVEN DOLLARS ($17,167) TO SHARPTON, BRUNSON AND COMPANY, P.A. FOR ITS SERVICES RENDERED IN CONNECTION WITH THE LOAN PORTFOLIO AUDIT OF MIAMI CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT, INC. AS OF JUNE 30, 1986; FURTHER AUTHORIZING THAT SAID FUNDS BE ALLOCATED FROM TWELFTH (12TH) YEAR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS PREVIOUSLY APPROPRIATED FOR FISCAL YEAR 1986-87 ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. WHEREAS, the City Commission is desirous of maintain its neighborhood revitalization efforts in the community target areas; and WHEREAS, on July 24, 1986, the City Commission passed Motion No. 86-683 authorizing and directing the City Manager to obtain the services of an independent outside auditor to conduct an audit of Miami Capital Development, Inc.'s loan portfolio, intake and disbursement process; and WHEREAS, the aforementioned audit has been completed, reviewed by the City Administration and responded to by the Board of Director's and staff of Miami Capital Development, Inc.; and WHEREAS, Miami Capital Development Inc. has already expended thirty -thousand dollars ($30,000) of its proposed Twelfth (12th) Year administrative budget; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Article 4.3 of Agreement dated November 6, 1985 between the City of Miami and Miami Capital Development, Inc., payment in the amount of seventeen thousand one hundred and sixty-seven dollars ($17,167) for said audit will also be taken from Miami Capital's Twelfth (12th) year proposed administrative budget of one hundred and twenty thousand dollars ($120,000); and CITY COMMISSION MEETING OF DEC lI im ^I A WHEREAS, seventy-two thousand eiqht hundred and thirty-three dollars ($72,833) will be remaining ($120,000 - $30,000 - $17,167 = $72,833) in the Corporation's allocated administrative budget amount; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The City Manager is hereby authorized to satisfy the bill of debit in the amount of seventeen thousand one hundred and sixty-seven dollars ($17,167) to Sharpton, Brunson and company, P.A., for services rendered in connection with the examination of Miami Capital Development, Inc.'s loan portfolio as of June 30, 1986; said authorization being subject to both the City and the latter firm's acknowledgment that an exit conference has been held. Section 2. Funds for said purpose are to be drawn down against Miami Capital's proposed Twelfth (12th) Year Community Development administrative budget, appropriated at a level of one hundred and twenty thousand dollars ($120,000). PASSED AND ADOPTED this llth day of cember 86. XAVIER L. SUAR , MAYOR ATTE M TTY HIRAI CITY CLERK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: e,4"�t e444�, ROBERT F. LARK CHIEF DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY APPROVAOTOFORM AND CORRECTNESS: a+v� s7• ✓VVV CITY ATTORNEY RFC:bss:M290 867-99G 11 CITY OF MIAM1, FLORIDA 11 20 INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission FROM: Cesar H. Odio City Manager RECOMMENDATION: DATE: DEC -.519� FILE, SUBJECT: Resolution authorizing the City Manager to approve payment REFERENCES: ENCLOSURES: It is respectively recommended that the City Commission adopt the attached resolution authorizing the release of payment to Sharpton, Brunson and Company, P.A., in substantially the form attached hereto, per Article 4.3 of the agreement between Miami Capital Development, Inc. and the City of Miami for the professional services of said Corporation in the implementation of a revolving loan fund program, in accordance with the terms and conditions as set forth therein. BACKGROUND: The Department of Community Development has analyzed the need to execute the attached resolution authorizing and approving expenditures incurred by Miami Capital Development, Inc. as it related to its recent loan portfolio audit performed by Sharpton, Brunson and Company, P.A., Certified Public Accountants. The proposed resolution allows Community Development to pay for said services from funds appropriated in the Twelfth (12th) year Community Development Block Grant Fund to Miami Capital Development, Inc. for its administrative cost. On July 24, 1986, the City Commission passed Motion No. 86-638 authorizing and directing the City Manager to obtain the services of an independent outside auditor to conduct an audit of the Miami Capital Development, Inc. loan portfolio, intake, and disbursement process. The aforementioned motion further stipulated that only thirty thousand dollars ($30,000) be allocated for Miami Capital Development, Inc. administrative operations for a period of three (3) months or until the above -cited audit was complete. /qxjd&�' wxe� 9 as) The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission Page 2 The contract agreement dated November 6, 1985 between the City of Miami and Miami Capital Development, Inc. was automatically renewed in accordance with Article 1.3 of said agreement. As a result, thirty thousand dollars ($30,000) of the one hundred and twenty thousand dollars ($120,000) appropriated for Miami Capital Development, Inc. has been expended on the first three (3) months of administrative cost. Thereby reducing Miami Capital's proposed Twelfth (12th) Year administrative budget to ninety thousand dollars ($90,000), ($120,000 - $30,000 = $90,000) As a result of Motion 86-638, the audit of Miami Capital Development, Inc.'s loan portfolio has been completed, reviewed by City administration and staff as well as responded to by Miami Capital's Board of Directors and staff. In addition, the cost of services rendered in connection with the examination of Miami Capital Development, Inc.'s loan portfolio as of June 30, 1986, totals seventeen thousand one hundred and sixty-seven dollars ($17,167). This payment due, in accordance with Article 4.3 of the agreement between the City of Miami and Miami Capital Development, Inc., will be drawn against Miami Capital Development, Inc.'s Twelfth (12th) Year proposed administrative allocation, thereby leaving seventy-two thousand eight hundred and thirty-three dollars ($72,833) available for administrative cost during the fiscal period ($90,000 - $17,167 = $72,833). es-sss M-GQS) s�