HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-87-0604J-87-597
6/15/87
r
RESOLUTION NO.
��;' �'► x
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN ADDENDUM
CONTAINING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATED
TO VARIOUS COMPONENTS OF THE PREVIOUSLY
APPROVED OMNI AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN, A
COPY OF WHICH ADDENDUM IS ATTACHED HERETO
AND WHICH SHALL BECOME PART OF THE OMNI
AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN.
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 86-634 (July 23, 1986) the City
of Miami Commission authorized the preparation of an Omni Area
Redevelopment Plan (hereinafter the "Plan"), dated September
1986; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 86-868 (October 23, 1986) the
City of Miami Commission received and approved, in principle,
said Plan and recommended approval of said Plan by the Board of
Commissioners for Metropolitan Dade County; and
WHEREAS, the Finance Committee of the Board of Commissioners
for Metropolitan Dade County has requested that an addendum
containing additional information related to various components
jof the Plan be supplied by the City of Miami in advance of second
reading approval of said plan, which is scheduled to take place
on July 7, 1987; and
WHEREAS, an addendum containing the requested additional
information has been jointly prepared by the Planning Department
and Department of Development (hereinafter the "Addendum"), dated
June 1987;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The City Commission hereby approves the attached
Addendum, dated June 1987, as containing additional information
to become part of the Omni Area Redevelopment Plan, dated
September 1986, which Plan the �C,Qmmission rhas approved, in��
principle, by previous resolution. -.•� CITY COD'iI�ISSIO
"�' r U','"`� MEETING OF
TION No.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25thday of June , 1987'MIER L. SUAREW MAYOR
ATTEST:
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
APPROVEY�S TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS
. UV VNIIL." 1 1 ,
87-604
ADDENDUM TO OMNI AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
PREPARED JUNE 17; 1987
87- 041.
ADDENDUM TO
OMN1 AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM
PAGE
Summary of Addendum
A-1
108. Planning Process
A-3
Y.C. Relocation
A-5
II.A. Boundaries
A-6
IV.F. Neighborhood Impact
A
Capital Improvements Charts
A-9; A-10
V.B.I. Acquisition Plan
A-11 thru A-14
V.8.2. Financial Strategy
and Timetables
A-15
V.O. Disposition of Property
A-16 thru A-19
S
ADDENDUM TO OMN1 AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
PREPARED JUNE 179 1987
This addendum has been prepared to respond to a list of questions
and concerns for Miami additional detail presented to the City of
Miami following a review by consultants to Metropolitan Dade
County. In some cases the questions and concerns; listed below,
have been be satisfied by directing attention to specific
sections of the original September. 1986 Plan. In other cases,
additional information or detail has been added to more fully
explain the redevelopment plan in terms of the requirements of
F.S. Chapter 163. ,
The list is as follows:
1. Additional responses to 163.360 (2):
A. Under (a), additional detail on conformance with
comprehensive plan is included in a revised and expanded Section
I.B. (Revised Page 3(a).)
B. Under (b); clarification of relocation component is
provided through a revised and expanded Section Y.C. (Revised
Page 28.)
2. Additional responses to 163.360 (6):
A. Under (a); concerning relocation of families, no public
acquisition of residential properties is proposed (see Revised
Section V. C.; Revised Page 28). Also; see Section IV. F.
(Neighborhood Impact).
B. Under (c); concerning plan consideration of adequate park
and recreation facilities; this is covered in Section IV. C.
(Community Facilities and Services) on page 16 of the September
1986 Plan.
C. Under (d); concerning maximizing opportunities for
participation by private enterprise in the redevelopment plan,
see Section V. F. (Economic Development Plan), generally, which
discusses strategies to attract new private economic activity
into the redevelopment area; and Section V. D. (Disposition of
Property), which describes the process by which private
enterprise will be enlisted and selected to take the lead in a
catalytic project as a major component of the redevelopment
activities.
3. Additional responses to 163.360 (7):
L
87760
A: Under (a); a response is not applicable; since
residential reuse of acquired open land is not proposed.
B. Under (b); the required responses are included in
Sections 1. A: (Purpose); 1.8. (Planning Process), IV. A.
(Concept) and V.F. (Economic Development Plan) of the September
1986 Plan.
4. Additional responses to 163.'362:
A. Under (1); information as to reasons for establishment of
the project areas boundaries as proposed in the plan and an
explanation of changing conditions since the 1981 Central Area
Redevelopment Plan boundaries were designated is included as a
revised Section II. A. (Revised Page 4.)
B. Under (3); a Neighborhood Impact element has been added
as a new Section IV. F: to the plan.
C. Under (4); Section V: B. (Capital Improvements) of the
September 1984 Plan has been expanded to include a specific
Capital Improvements Plan (Phase I and Phase II). This covers
the capital improvements budget and implementation schedule for
those improvements proposed to be funded from the tax increment
revenues. Included in this expanded section is an Acquisition
Plan; Acquisition Map and a list of proposed list of properties
for acquisition.
D. Under (5); descriptions of safeguards; and under (6)
controls for the carrying out of the redevelopment plan, and
adherence thereto' are described in Section V. D. which contains,
as an attachment; City of Miami Charter Section 53(c) (Unified
Development Projects), which calls for a specific Development
Agreement to be executed with private redevelopment entities
having been selected to undertake development .on City -acquired or
City -owned real property:'
E. Under (8); the elements of residential use are included
in the September 1984 Plan under Sections IV. B. (Land Use), V.
A. (Zoning), and in the new Sections IV. F. (Neighborhood
Impact):
F. Under (9); additional responses to this plan requirement
are included in the revised and expanded Section V. B. (Capital
Improvements); which contains.
G. Under (10) ,' the timetables for completion of all actions
to be funded with tax increments are detailed in the revised and
expanded Section V. B. (Capital Improvements).
87 -604
A-3
r ON
I. B. PLANNING P90CESS
The Omni Area Redevelopment Plan has been prepared according to the
requirements specified by the Community Redevelopment Act of 1969, as amended
(Fla. Statutes 163.330 et. seq.) As mandated by the Act, the redevelopment
plan must conform to the adopted comprehensive plans for the City of Miami and
Dade County. Final approval must be granted by the Miami City Commission and
the Board of Dade County Commissioners following recommendations by their
respective planning advisory agencies.
This redevelopment Rlan conforms with the City of Miami's official
comprehensive plan, which s entitled omprehensive Neighborhood an, ity o
Miami a tem er 1985. It is consistent with tTi he comprehensive p land use
map and the "Planned trate s_Development Areas 1982-198811 which reads:
"16. Omni/Midtown: Encourage the development of a high intensity
commercial/office/residential district with pedestrian amenities
adequate Parking, improved vehicu ar access, and preservation o
historic structures."
In addition to the comprehensive plan, two specific planning studies have
helped to define the objectives of this redevelopment plan.
The Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Plan, adopted in 1981,
identifies the Omni West area (area west of NE 2nd Avenue) as a primary
relocation area for commercial services and light industrial uses displaced by
redevelopment within the Southeast Overtown/Park West project area.
In 1985, the City began the process of preparing an updated and more detailed
master plan for Downtown Miami, whose boundaries incorporate all of the
redevelopment area plus Southeast Overtown/Park West, the Central Business
District, and Brickell. This plan provides policies and guidelines for
implementation of all downtown development and provides the foundation for the
preparation of a Development of Regional Impact application for the area
within the jurisdiction of the Downtown Development Authority.
A Citizen's Advisory Committee was established to provide input to the master
plan. This group includes representatives from the Omni neighborhood and
provides a forum where interested citizens, civic leaders, and public
officials join forces to address development issues and community concerns.
During a series of workshops, held over a six-month period, a draft downtown
policy plan has been formulated. The document identifies development
objectives for the Omni neighborhood including the following:. establishment
- 3(a) -
(Revised, June 1987)
ON
87-60,
A- 4'
Of strong functional and visual connections with the Central Business District
through a redeveloped Bayfront open space, baywalks, redesigned Biscayne
Boulevard, and extension of Metrorail and Metromover; development of a high
quality "uptown" district with a viable mixture of hotel, residential, and
retail uses; promotion of a nightlife and entertainment district; creation of
a special use district to attract new types of specialized commercial activity
to the area including media and fashion related businesses; and reinforcement
of the area west of N.E. 2nd Avenue as a commercial/industrial area serving
the downtown and Seaport.
The major- :9-am all three plaPP449 pro9r-a_m,_r. have boom 9-inth—
The Dade County Comprehensive Development Master Plan designates the Omni Area
as a metropolitan activity center in the south and central portions of the
area and for high and medium -high --density residential and industrial/office
development in a east to west Pattern in the remainder o the area. The COMP
guidelines for activty centers cal or these design -unified complexes to
have commercial facilities offices high-rise apartments, and public
facilities, having trect mass transit access. The development proposed for
the portion of the Omni Area south of N.E. 17F Terrace and east of N.E. 2nd
Avenue corresponds to these guidelines. Also the development pattern in the
remainder of the Omni Area conforms to the g neral i zed patterns of the OMP
map.
0
- 3(b) -
(Revised, June 1987)
11
87--604
A-5
Y'. C. RELOCATION
The Community Redevelopment Act specifies that any plan prepared
under this Act provide assurances that there will be replacement
housing for the relocation of persons temporarily or permanently
displaced from housing, facilities within the redevelopment area
[Fla. Stats. 163.362(7)]. Chapter 163 also mandates that an
appropriate procedure be established and adhered to which insures
that such families are relocated to decent and safe housing
without any undue hardship [Fla. Stats. 163.360(6)(a)].
•'.�imi ted health ale 5afe%y pr—ob;-emsIs
—
No public acquisition of residential properties are proposed.
Priority consideration for the acquisition of properties will be
ven o vacant land ana vacant commercia strut ores.
Parcels 8, 5, and 6 as delineated in the Acquisition Plan entail
commercial relocation and include only 4 bui'inesses.
All business displaced by proposed public acquisition will be
provided ec nica assistance by the C ity o iami. Inis
assistance will be provided y the Uepartment of Development and
will include the utilization of a Business Retenfion Counselor.
Adequate facilities exist within the proximity of proposed
acquisition for the relocation of the affected usinesses.
Revised Page 28
/0
s7-so4
A-6
II.BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION AND BOUNDARIES
The Omni Redevelopment Area is located in the northern most section of
Downtown Miami, adjacent to the planned Southeast Overtown/Park West
residential community. It is within 1/2 mile of the heart of the Central
Business District and within i mile of the rapidly growing office district
along Brickell Avenue. The geographic location and boundaries of the area are
illustrated on the Location Map (see page v ). A legal description of the
site is provided in Appendix A.
The redevelopment area is strategically positioned within the City of Miami
and the metropolitan area. It has convenient access to the Miami
International Airport, Miami Beach and the regional highway system. The Port
of Miami, the Civic Center, and other major business and activity centers in
the City of Miami are within easy reach of the Omni neighborhood residents and
employees. The planned Metromover extension will provide a direct link to the
CBD and the existing Metrorail system.
The redevelo ment area is bounded by I-395 on the south Biscayne Say on the
east th Street on the north, and the FEC Railwayon the west. here
boundaries were selected because they represent significant geographic
features that provide physical demarkation of a "neighborhood" or "district"
commonly mown as the "Omni Area". 7-t-1-s—necessary to include the entire
nei4borhood withir, the redevelopment area to comprehensively and a ehctive�y
implement strategies aimed at the elimination sum and -light .
i ht. The slum and
blight conditions themselves while not uni orm y distributed throughout the
neighborhoohave negative effects on deve o ment and revitalization efforts
throw bout the area. The proposed redevelopment district boundaries also
coincide with the -Downtown Master Plan boundaries or the Omni sub -area.
The Central Miami Community Redevelopment District boundaries were amended in
1981 to include t e portion of the Omni area located to the west of Biscayne
Boulevard. At that time the Omni West area contained most all of the classic
signs of sum and blight; however, the Omni East area appeared to be on the
verge of widespread re eve o ment. However conditions than ed and no new
redevelopment occured, aside from comElelion of the Venetia comp ex which was
un� at that time. InsteaU '
conditions declined in the East Omni area:
two major retail stores closed and remain vacant numerous sma er retai
s aces are vacant. e��tt __crime bias -increased to thiighest localized rate in
t e it o iami and from 1985 to 1999, the assessed value of properties
ec one a total of 24 percent. For t ese reasons, it is necessary to expand
the Zommunity Redevelopment Area _boundary eastward to Biscavne Bay.
-4-
(Revised, June 1987)
�1
8': -604
IV. F. NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT
The Omni Redevelopment area contained a total of 1800 housing units in 1980,
according to the U.S. Census. Approximately 800 units have recently been
added to this total with the opening of the new Venetia condominium. The
majority of the housing units are located in two distinct areas. The largest
concentration is in the East Omni area, located to the east and north of the
Omni shopping mall. It is generally middle to upper income in cost and is in
good condition. The second concentration of existing housing is in the
central portion of the Omni West area from N.E. 1st Court to N.W. Miami Court.
This housing is generally very old, deteriorated (15% of the structures are
dilapidated), and priced for the low and moderate income market.
1. Housing displacement — This redevelopment plan does not recommend public
acquisition of land that is currently developed with housing. However, if
initiatives in this plan are successful in stimulating redevelopment of anchor
commercial uses on any of the parcels indicated in the Land Acquisition map, a
long term indirect effect may be to increase the value of land in the Omni
West area for commercial uses. It is important to note that the Omni West
area has been zoned for commercial uses for over 25 years; therefore, this
redevelopment plan is not responsible for initiating a policy that would
displace housing. The effect of this plan may be to speed uo a process of
transition from residential to commercial uses that has been slowly occuring
over the past 25 years.
If the private sector chooses to acquire land and replace residential units
with commercial units, the displaced low and moderate income households will
have the opportunity to find housing in the nearby Southeast Overtown Park
West redevelopment area, where over 9000 housing units are planned by the year
2005. Of the Phase I, Stage I projects that are committed and scheduled for
construction in 1987, 147 units will be reserved for low and moderate income
households.
In addition, this redevelopment plan proposes that a "housing linkage" program
be established in connection with the creation of a new SPI-6.1 zoning
district in the Omni East area (see page 23). The recommendation is to
establish an Affordable Housing Trust Fund in the Omni area (similar to an
existing program in the Brickell area) to subsidize tow and moderate income
housing construction within the redevelopment district and its immediate
surroundings. The concept is for commercial development to contribute to the
Trust Fund in exchange for a floor area ratio bonus.
Housing in the Omni East area is not expected to be displaced by commercial
uses due to the residential zoning limitations in the area north of N.E. 17th
Terrace and the substantial investment in new housing along the bayfront.
2. Traffic Circulation — Traffic volumes are projected to increase steadily
through future years, due to intensified development both internal and
external to the redevelopment district. Biscayne Boulevard and the I-395
entrance and exit at N.E. 1st and 2nd Avenues are projected to operate at or
/ 2,
87-604
A-8
6
below level of service E during peak hour within the next 5 to 10 years.
Because the Omni area is in a downtown location, traffic congestion is
expected and considered to be an acceptable condition. This redevelopment
plan provides the potential for use of tax increment funds to implement
numerous roadway improvement projects that have been identified to improve
alternate routes of travel (see Section IV 0., pages 18 through 20). Most
importantly, construction of the Metromover extension through the Omni area
will create a link to the CBO and the Metrorail system, providing an
alternative means of travel for Omni area residents.
3. Environmental Quality - Redevelopment in the Omni area will help to improve
water quality in Biscayne Bay by eliminating existing surface water runoff
from private property, and by redirecting runoff into the groundwater via
various types of drainage structures approved by the City and Dade County.
Air quality within the redevelopment area will be negatively affected by
increased traffic congestion. As a condition of the Downtown Development of
Regional Impact project, a carbon monoxide monitor will be funded by the City
of Miami to measure CO concentrations at the most congested intersection in
the Omni area. If CO concentrations begin to approach the federal EPA
standards, a series of traffic management strategies will be implemented to
assure that' violations do not occur. Any such CO concerns are limited to an 8
hour exposure in a localized area along the public sidewalks and are not
expected to have any significant effect on residents of the neighborhood.
The visual environment is expected to be upgraded substantially by private
redevelopment and the public improvement projects described in the Proposed
Open Space Plan (Map 7).
4. Community Facilities and Services - These elements are addressed in Section
IV.C., pages lb and 17.
/3
$7: 604
A— 9
V. B. CHART I
Phase I Capital Improvement Projects
To be Funded With Tax Increment Revenue bond
Projected earliest date of Issuance: Jan 1, 1989
Improvements to Biscayne Boulevard S 200009000
Public Acquisition of Site for
Catalytic Project* 99000,000
TOTAL $119,000,000
* The specific site for the Catalytic Project will be selected
I through a competitive proposal process in which private
development entities will be invited to submit joint public -
private development proposals for one or more of the proposed
sites (see New Page 29.) The proposals will be evaluated on a
number of criteria, including proposal feasibility, benefit to
area, ability to proceed quickly, and conformity to the
overall redevelopment plan for the Omni Area. The financiel
participation by the City would be limited to the amount that
could be issued in tax increment revenue bonds on January 1,
1989 for this purpose. The current best estimate is $9
million.
A-10
V. B. CHART 11
Phase II Capital Improvement Projects To Be Funded With flax Increment Revenue
Acquire right-of-way and construct
N.E. 20th Street connection between
N.E. 2nd Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard $1,0000000
Acquire right-of-way and construct N.W. 1st Avenue
(Westside Corridor) extension between
N.W. 14th Street and 1495 �300,000
N.E. 14th Street corridor enhancement $910,000
Pedestrian baywalk connection to $2509000
Bicentennial Park (1/2 cost)
Landmark feature at N. Miami Avenue $100,000
and 14th Street
Transit connection to Miami Beach
Convention Center undetermined
All Phase I and Phase II activities will be completed by the 20th year of
the project. All indebtedness will be retired by the 30th year.
/-S
�3
O
Y. g. 1 i ACQUISITION PLAN
In order to implement proposed economic development activities
planned, public'invtivement in land acquisition is planned.
The parcels indicated on the Land Acquisition Map shall be
acquired in order to: (1) eliminate unhealthful; unsanitary or
unsafe conditions; (2) lessen densities; (3) eliminate obsolete
or other uses detrinental to the public welfare; or (d) remove or
prevent the spread of blight; economic disuse or deterioration,
(5) remove incompatible land use relationships; or (6) provide
land for new housing; public facilities and economic development.
It should be noted that the map shows maximum acquisition and not
all parcels designated may, be acquired.
It is anticipated that some of the parcels designated on the Land
Acquisition Map may be only partially acquired.
Buildings of historic and/or cultural significance may be
acquired in order to preserve the structure. Priority
acquisition will be given to presently vacant parcels at
strategic locations that have maximum redevelopment potential.
Recommended land acquisition for economic redevelopment and
housing activities include the following parcels:
//
87760
Proposed Acquisition
Parcel
Approx.
Existing
No.
Legal
Acreage
Land Use
1-
Boulevard Tract 100-65
4.4
Vacant
structure &
parking
Sears Parking
2-
Nelsonvitla Amend 4-81
2.2
Vacant
Lots 35wSS
structure &
parking
Jefferson Add 108-55
3-
A1cie Baldwin Add
1
Vacant
Block 2
Lots 1-8
4-
Robbins-Graham-
LhIllingworIn
1
Vacant
oc
Lots 5,8,9;10;11;12
5-
Biscayne Federal Plaza
mert e -
1.3
Commercial &
Tract A
vacant
6-
Biscayne Federal Plaza
s
0.7
Commercial &
Tract
vacant
7-
Miramar PB 5-4
0.3
Vacant
Block
Lots 7,'10,'11;12
8-A
W.T.'Neslington'Sub B-97
1.7
Commercial
Lots 1-8
Seitter,Add,Amend 2-60
Lots 1,2
8-B
Robbins-Graham-
C.Hillingworth
1.3
Commercial
Block
NEW PAGE 27.1
87-604
f
1
i
I
Proposed
Acquisition
Parcel
Approx.
No.
Legal
Acreage
8=C
Robbins -Graham-
ngwor
1.3
j
Block
i
8-D
Robbins-Graham-
i ingwor
1.3
B oc
i
8-E
Rice & Sullivan Sub
4-164
Block
.9
Lots 22 & 23
Miramar 3rd Amend
oc
Lots 3 & 4
9-F
Miramar 3rd Amend
.2
block
Lots 13 & 14
NEW PAGE 27.2
Existing
Land Use
Commercial &
vacant
Vacant
Commercial
Parking
Commercial
/F
87--604
c
t1' 1 •
Acquisition Plan ° zoo Kw wo
OMNI AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN M �"°'
87-60
A-15
Y. $. 2 Financial Strategy and Timetable for Phase I Improvements
Plans call for *the Issuance of an $11.5 million tax increment
revenue bond at such time tax increment revenue reach point that
a bond of this site can be issued. This requires approximately
$13 million in annual tax increment revenues, assuming a taxable
bond. Current estimates indicate that this increment revenue
could be achieved as early as 1988' assuming a plan enactment in
July of 1987. The initial TIRB would fund the Phase I Capi ta-i
Improvements; which would be implemented under a timetable as
shown below:
January 1, 1989 - Initiate engineering drawings,
plans and specifications for
Biscayne Boulevard
improvements.
Cali for Phase I catalytic
Project Proposals from
potential developers.'
July 19, 1989 - Begin construction of Biscayne
Boulevard Improvements.
October 1, 1989 - Select developer and Phase I
catalytic Project.
December 1, 1989 - Completion of Biscayne
Boulevard Improvements.
October 1. 1990 - Land Development agreement
approved with developer.
Public land acquisition is
initiated.
October 1; 1991 - Public land acquisition is -
completed.
Deadline for developer to
begin construction.
All activities will be completed by the 20th year of the project. All
indebtedness will be retired by the 30th year.
Page 34 (a)
Wal
il�
6�s
A-15
V. 8: 2 Financial Strategy and Timetable for Phase I Improvements
Plans tali for the Issuance of an $11.5 million tax increment
revenue bond at such time tax increment revenue reach point that
a bond of this size can be issued. This requires approximately
$1.5 million in annual tax increment revenues, assuming a taxable
bond. Current estimates indicate that this increment revenue
could be achieved as early as 1988; assuming a plan enactment in
July of 19876' The initial TIRE would fund the Phase I Capita'i
Improvements; which would be implemented under a timetable as
shown below:
January 1; 1989 -
Initiate engineering drawings,
plans and specifications for
Biscayne Boulevard
improvements.
Call for Phase I catalytic
Project Proposals from
potential developers.'
July 1; 1989 -
Begin construction of Biscayne
Boulevard Improvements.
October 1; 1989 =
Select developer and Phase I
catalytic Project.
December 1; 1989 -
Completion of Biscayne
Boulevard Improvements.
October 1; 1990 =
Land Development agreement
approved with developer.
Public land acquisition is
initiated.
October 1; 1991 -
Public land acquisition is
completed.
Deadline for developer to
begin construction.
All activities will be completed by the 20th year of the project. All
indebtedness will be retired by the 30th year.
Page 34 (a)
ill -A 64*N
A-15
V. B: 2 'Financial Strategy and Timetable for Phase I Improvements
Plans call for *the Issuance of an $11.5 million tax increment
revenue bond at such t4 me tax increment revenue reach point that
a bond of this size can be issued. This requires approximately
$13 million in annual tax increment revenues, assuming a taxable
bond. Current estimates indicate that this increment revenue
could be achieved as early as 1988' assuming a plan enactment ;++
July of 1987. The initial TIRE would fund the Phase I Capita"i
Improvements, which would be implemented under a timetable as
shown below:
January 1, 1989 - Initiate engineering drawings,
plans and specifications for
Biscayne Boulevard
improvements.
Call for Phase I catalytic
Project Proposals from
potential developers.'
July 1; 1989 - Begin construction of Biscayne
Boulevard Improvements.
October 1; 1989 = Select developer and Phase I
catalytic Project.
December 1, 1989 - Completion of Biscayne
Boulevard Improvements.
October 1; 1990 - Land Development agreement
approved with developer.
Public land acquisition is
initiated.
October 1; 1991 - Public land acquisition is
completed.
Deadline for developer to
begin construction.
All activities will be completed by the 20th year of the project. All
indebtedness will be retired by the 30th year.
Page 34 (a)
87-60
V
�. 0. DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY
n
Any publicly acquired property to be used or transferred for
private development as part of -this redevelopment plan will be
either sold in conformance with Section 18 of the Miami City
Code, or will be mad6 available on a long-term lease basis.
Private redeveloper(s) of leased property will be selected under
the procedures of the Unified Development Process (UDP) Ordinance
of the City of Miami Ordinance 9672 (See Appendix).
The following sites may be acquired for redevelopment purposes.
e propose reuse o eacho these sites s "listed on the
l'oT lowing table (Note Acquisition Plan Maa for location).
Proposed Land Reuse
PROPOSED SITES
PROPOSED
FOR CATALYTIC PROJECTS
ACREAGE
REUSE
1
4.4
Commercial
2
2.2
Commercial
3
1.0
Commercial
4
1.0
Commercial
5
1.3
Commercial
6
0.7
Commercial
7
0.3
Commercial
8A-8F
6.7
Commercial
New Page 29
.2/
A-17
.
CITY OF MIAMI
a�r er Section 53 (c)
UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
Definition
Unified development project shalt mean a project where
an interest iii real property is owned or is to be
acquired by the city, and is to be used for the devel-
opment of'improvements, and where the commission deter-
mines that for the development of said improvements it
is most advantageous to the city that the city procure
from a private person, as defined in the Code of the
City of Miami, one or more of the following integrated
packages:
(i) Planning and design, construction, and leasing;
or
(ii) Planning and design, leasing, and management; or
(III) Planning and design, construction, and
management.
So long as the person from whom the city procures one
of the above mentioned integrated packages provides all
of the funct7ons listed for that package, such person
need not provide each listed function for the entire
unified development project nor for the same part of
the unified development project.
.Requirements of Requests for Proposals
Requests for proposals for unified development projects
shall generally define the nature of the uses the city
is seeking for the unified development project and the
estimated allocations of land for each use. They shall
also state the following:
(i) The specific parcel of
used or the geographic
develop pursuant to
project.
land contemplated to be
area the city desires to
the unified development
III) 'The specific evaluation criteria to be used by
the below -mentioned certified public accounting
fi rm.
.22
s
�. • A-18
(iii) The specific evaluation, criteria to be used by
the below -mentioned review committee.
,(iv) The extent of the city's proposed commitment of
funds, property, and services.
(v) The definitions of the terms "substantial
increase". and "material alteration" that will
apply to the project pursuant to subsection
(e)(iv); creaf.
NO A reservation of the right to reject all pro-
posals and of the right of termination referred
to in subsection (e)(iv), below.
Issuance of -Request for Proposals; Selection
of C.P.A. Firm; Appointment of Review Committee
After public notice there shall be a public hearing at
which the commission shall consider:
(i) The contents of the request for proposals for
the subject unified development project;
(ii) The selection of a certified public accounting
firm, which shall include at least one member
with previous experience in the type of devel-
opment W question;
(iii) The recommendations of the City Manager for the
appointment of persons to serve on the review
committee. Said review committee shall consist
of an appropriate number of city officials or
employees* and an equal number plus one of mem-
bers of the public, whose names shall be submit-
ted by the City Manager no fewer than five days
prior to the above mentioned public hearing.
At the conclusion of the public hearing the commission
shall authorize the issuance of a request for
proposals, select a certified public accounting firm,
and appoint the members of the review committee only
from among the persons recommended by the City Manager.
Procedure for Selection of Proposal
The procedure for the selection of an integrated pack-
age proposal shall be as follows:
*Dade County officials or employees shall also be
appointed.
023
F
A-19
After receiving the direct recommendations of the re-
view committee,, the commission shall by an affirmative
vote of a majority of its members:
(1) Accept any recommendation of the review committee;
or
(2) Accept any previous recommendation of the Cfti
Manager; or
(3) Reject all proposals.
Execution,of Contracts
All contracts for unified development projects shall be
signed by the City Manager or his designee after
approval there)f by the commission. . . . The provi-
sions of this charter section shall supersede any other
Charter or Code provision to the contrary.
87 -mv
13
CITY Of: MIAMI. FLORIDA
INtLEFt-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO. Honorable Mayor and Members
of the C i ty Commission
FROM, Cesar H. Odio 60
City Manager
RECOMMENDATION:
it is respectfully recommended
attached resolution approving
information related to various
Omni Area Redevelopment Plan, a
made a part hereof and which
Redevelopment Plan.
BACKGROUND:
DATE: J U N 17 1987 FILE:
SUBJECT: Addendum To Omni Area
Redevelopment Plan
REFERENCES: June 2 5 t h Commission
Agenda
ENCLOSURES:
that the City Commission adopt the
an addendum containing additional
components of the previously approved
copy of which is attached hereto and
shall become part of the Omni Area
The Planning Department and Department of Development have analyzed
the need for this action. The Dade County Commission is scheduled to
approve the Omni Area Redevelopment Plan on second reading of an
ordinance on July 7, 1987. At a meeting of the County Commission's
Finance Committee on June 8, 1987, the Omni Area Redevelopment Plan
was reviewed by GA Associates, a firm currently serving as consultant
to Dade County on tax increment redevelopment issues. GA Associates
recommended that, prior to final County action, several portions of
the plan be detailed with more specific information to assure
conformance with the requirements of Chapter 163 of the Florida
Statutes, which is the enabling legislation for Community
Redevelopment Projects. The attached addendum contains the
additional information recommended by GA Associates.
The addendum contains no information in conflict with the Omni Area
Redevelopment Plan, dated September 1986, and approved by the City
Commission on October 23, 1986 (Resolution No. 86-868). The addendum
contains more specific responses to a number of plan components
required by the latest revisions to the state redevelopment law.
Attachments
Resolution
Plan Addendum
s7-s0 4