Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem #41 - First Reading Ordinancei. C171 J-87-400 6/11/87 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, BY ADDING A NEW SECTION 54-499 THEREBY ESTABLISHING A "LATE FEE SCHEDULE" FOR APPLICATION BY THE CITY TO UTILITY COMPANIES WHOSE DELAY IN COMPLETING MODIFICATIONS TO THEIR FACILITIES ADVERSELY AFFECT THE CITY'S HIGHWAY CONTRACTORS; PROVIDING FOR THE COLLECTION OF SUCH LATE FEE TO COMMENCE ON THE DATE THE CITY ISSUES A "NOTICE TO PROCEED" TO ITS CONTRACTOR; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. WHEREAS, the City of Miami has been rebuilding approximately ten miles of roadways per year; and WHEREAS, in conjunction with the City's rebuilding of roadways, the utility companies are required to accomplish all necessary relocations, rebuilding, upgrading, cleanup, etc., of their facilities; and WHEREAS, the City holds utility coordination meetings for each proposed highway improvement for the purpose of coordinating the City's construction with the necessary utility construction; and WHEREAS, the City directs each utility company to accomplish` all its work prior to the start of roadway construction; and WHEREAS, it is incumbent upon the utility companies to 1 complete their work in a timely manner to meet the schedules established by the City; and WHEREAS, over the years, a consistent pattern has developed whereby one or more utility companies have not completed their work prior to the City's start of roadway construction; and WHEREAS, the City's program is being hindered by having utility poles, facilities, crews, etc. remain in the path of construction, resulting in extra work, the scheduling of extra man-hours and rescheduling of construction activity due to delay in the removal of such poles, facilities and crews; and WHEREAS, this persistent delay is being reflected in higher ►: costs and delays to the City in its accomplishing roadway work y and improvements; and WHEREAS, it is necessary that a "Late Fee Schedule" be established for application by the City against those utility companies who adversely affect the City's highway program and by their delay require additional administrative effort and attention by the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The Code of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, is hereby amended by adding a new Section 54-49 thereto reading as follows: "Sec. 54-49 Late fee assessment for failure to relocate equipment. (a) In the event that a utility company fails to complete its facility relocation, rebuilding, upgrading, cleanup, etc., necessitated by a roadway improvement/project within the City, by the deadline date established by the Department of Public Works and furnished in writing to said utility company, the City hereby assesses late fees upon the utility company. The late fee schedule is as follows: Fifty dollars ($50) per calendar day per pole, assessed against owner of pole. Fifty dollars ($50) per calendar day per wire and/or cable attached to each pole assessed against owner(s) of wire and/or cable. Fifty dollars ($50) per calendar day per anchor and/or guy wire, assessed against owner of anchor and/or guy wire. Ten dollars ($10) per linear foot of trench dug by utility company or contractor working for utility company. (b) Said fees shall be assessed for the period beginning on the date the City issues a notice to proceed to its street improvement contractor, which date shall be one day after the deadline date referred to in subsection (a) hereof, and ending on the date that the uti 1 i ty company's facilities have been upgraded or relocated and the right of way vacated and/or restored in accordance with the standards and specifications of the Department of Public Works and any applicable codes including the City of Miami and South Florida Building Code. (c) Where late fees assessed hereunder are not paid by the utility company within 60 days from the date the City forwarded its invoice by certified mail, there shall be an additional 0.1% of the total invoice amount assessed for each calendar day delay in payment beyond the 60 days mentioned above." Section 2. All ordinances or parts of ordinances insofar as they are inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed. -2- r` Section 3. If any section, part of a section, paragraph, clause, phrase or word of this ordinance is declared invalid, the remaining provisions of this ordinance shall not be affected. PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this 9th day of July , 1987. PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING BY TITLE ONLY this day of , 1987. ATTEST: CITY CLERK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: CHIEF DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: CI ATTORNEY RFC /bss/M162 -3- 1 ' 42 CITY OF MIAMI. FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM -o Honorable Mayor and Members OATS JUN 3 U 1987 CILE Of the City Commission Ordinance Amending the Code SUBJEC- of the City by Establishing a "Late Fee Schedule" For Application By The City To 1 Utility Companies Who Delay REFERENCES The City Road Rebuilding Progra Cesar H. Odio ENCLOSURES City Manager RECOMMENDATION: It is respectfully recommended that the City Commission pass the attached ordinance amending the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, by adding a new Section 54-49. The new section will establish a "Late Fee Schedule" for application bV the City to utility companies whose delay in completing modifications to their facilities adversely affect the City's road rebuilding program. Such late fee will only commence on the date the City issues a "Notice to Proceed" to its contractor if the utility company has failed, after receipt of advance notice, to accomplish the required removal of its' facilities. 3ACKGROUND: The Department of Public Works, in a continuing effort to serve all residents of the City of Miami, is proposing an ordinance to amend the City Code by adding a new Section 54-49 to establish a "Late Fee Schedule" for application by the City to utility companies. The City of Miami has been rebuilding approximately ten miles of roadways per year. In conjunction with this rebuilding, the utility companies are required to accomplish all necessary relocations, rebuilding, upgrading, changes, etc., of their facilities. In order to coordinate the necessary utility construction, the city holds numerous utility coordination meetings for each proposed highway improvement. At these meetings, and by letter, the City directs each utility company to accomplish all its work prior to the start of the City's roadway construction. It is therefore incumbent upon each utility company to complete its work in a timely manner to meet the schedules established by the City. Over the years a consistent pattern has developed whereby one or more utility companies have not completed their work prior to the City's start of roadway construction. Consequently, the City's roadway rebuilding program is being hindered by having utility I -la —/ poleei facilities, crews, etc. remain in the path of construction. This results in the City's contractor incurring extra work, scheduling of extra man - hours and rescheduling of construction activity due to delay in the removal of such poles, facilities and utility crews. This persistent delay is being reflected in higher costs and delays to the City in accomplishing roadway work and improvements. Therefore, establishment of a "Late Fee Schedule" is recommended to be applicable to utility, companies whose untimely performance adversely affects the Citys road rebuilding program. Z