Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem #28 - Discussion Itemw. ~ /"'~ .~ --. Coconut drove ~~' ~lu~i ~~ , p.o.box X81 coconut grov~`'~~rx~ a~3~133 ~s.~ fit' }1 ~ ~ r' h'( ~~T~~~~~~"stn^,~ CITYrOFnMIAMImissioners ~~,.,~ ~~~ 3700 Pan American Drive Miami, Florida 33133 Dear Mayor and Commissioners: The Coconut Grove Civic Club wishes to express our concerns about the Coconut Grove Traffic Study as presented at two public meetings this month. Essentially our concerns center around the consistent overdevelopment of the business center, and the unrelenting growth and its effects which have spilled over into the surrounding residential neighborhoods. The result of this unchecked growth has been the steady increase in traffic through what used to be called a village. The solution to this traffic problem fs not the addition of a new street from Grand Avenue to Main Highway; neither is it the granting to the Miami Parking Authority the exclusive right to regulate parking in the business center; nor is it the widening of Bird Avenue. Outlined below are the specific problems the Civic Club sees fn this traffic study and some possible recommendations that may alleviate these problems. I. McDonald Street Extension - This will not alleviate the traffic problem in the Grove since the three main arteries into and out of the Grove are two lane roads. One of them cannot be widened and the other two are not scheduled for widening. All this proposal does fs redistribute traffic within the Grove causing the inevitable Grove traffic jams in different places. - This increases the traffic burden on the residential neighborhood behind the Playhouse. Given the past history of planning in the Grove, this would only be the first step to a commercial presence around the new Playhouse parking garage-retail development. - The role of t~e Playhouse parking garage-retail project curre tly being proposed is also problematic. There is no commitment from the Parking Authority or the developer that there will be no entrance to this project from McDonald and Grand. The only comment from the Parking Authority is that it deems this entrance "unnecessary". A strict prohibition, written in the development agreement would be a first step in guaranteeing that this defacto street extension will not occur. ~t SCk,SS! D~ ee :-~osl a r ~=: ~ > ;~ I ~ .~' ~1 r", /"~ ~ II. Off Site Parking - We're told that current zoning requirements that call for on site parking or parking within a specified distance from the site, encourage large scale development to meet those parking requirements. Thus the consultants' recommend that all parking requirements be met off-site as regulated by the Parking Authority. This is the crux of the parking/traffic problem in the Grove. Too many developers who can't meet their parking burden have leased spaces off site or have received variances to avoid meeting these requirements. Thus the increased traffic as shoppers "futilely" look for spaces close by the shops they frequent. This proposal will encourage larger projects unfettered by the on-site requirements currently in force. The requirement that the Parking Authority will oversee this new rule will merely encourage joint venture projects between it and sti~ch developers. It is not tors hard to envision the Grove being ringed by parking garages in areas like Florida Avenue, Oak Avenue and Matilda Street, further adding to the traffic problem and zoning problem in Coconut Grove. III. Bird Avenue - While the traffic planners have backed off their recommendations to four-lane Bird Avenue from McDonald to 27th Avenue, they have added "2 lanes" of parallel parking. This essentially is widening the street. It would serve to make an already intolerable intrusion problem on Abaco, Inagua and Lincoln Avenues worse. IV. Traffic Intrusion into Residential Neighborhoods - There is little mention of specifics to protect neighborhoods along Aviation and 27th Avenue, and those on the periphery of the Grove center (Virginia, Mary, Oak, Florida, William, Hibiscus, Charles and Franklin) from traffic intrusion during rush hour or during the cruising on Fridays, Saturdays and Sundays little in this study deals with solving or alleviating these problems. The Civic Club makes the fallowing recommendations: 1. No extension of McDonald from Grand Avenue to Main Highway. _ 2. Instruct the Parking Authority to insist on a guarantee from the developer of the parking garage = that ft will not ever cut through an entrance from Grand and McDonald. ee-ios~l . ~ __- ~` ~ 3. Protect the Charles Avenue, Avenue area's historical and creating a special public f prohibiting any re-platting, other such alteration of the ~~ William Avenue, Franklin architectural heritage by nterest historic district rezoning, r-ew streets or area. 4. Place a moratorium on all new development that does not have a~ parking on site until a survey is made of existing parking availability within the Grove center. This survey should show what spaces are leased by what businesses for the purposes of satisfying their parking requirements. In addition, the survey should specifically show how many parking spaces are required for each business in the Grove business district, how many are available for each business and how many have been "abolished" by variance. This would be a first step in determining what kind of traffic the Greve can bear and how to tailor development to the particular needs of the Grove. 5. Protect the areas around 27th Avenue, Aviation and Tigertail by limiting access to local traffic only during peak traffic hours (as is done in Bay Heights). 6. Protect the areas surrounding the Grove business district including Florida and oak Avenues; Virginia, Matilda, Hibiscus, Mundy and Elizabeth Streets; Williams, Thomas, Charles and Franklin Avenues; and Royal Road by limiting access to local traffic only during "cruising" traffic hours on Fridays, Saturdays and Sundays. We hope you remember that the Grove is a place where many people want to live, work and play. Let's try and keep a balance between these goals. Sincerely yours, ~~~~ Tucker ibbs, President TG/jal -~ ~ 88-ri06=1 :§ ~ ~ : r ,.-