Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-88-0157J-88-169 2/11/88 RESOLUTION N0. 88-157 A RESOLUTION EXTENDING THE DEADLINE FOR INITIATION OF CONSTRUCTION TO JUNE 15, 1988, FOR PARCEL N0. 55 OF THE SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST, PHASE I REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT; SAID EXTENSION TO BE MADE PART OF THE LAND DISPOSITION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI AND CIRCA/BARNESS/SAWYER A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP; AND FURTHER DECLARING THAT IF SAID CONSTRUCTION DEADLINE IS NOT MET, CIRCA/ BARNESS/SAWYER A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, LOSES ITS DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS IN PARCELS NO. 45, 55, and 56 OF SAID PROJECT. WHEREAS, the City Commission by Resolution No. approved, in principle, the Southeast Overtown/Park Redevelopment Plan; and 82-755 West WHEREAS, the City Commission by Resolution No. 84-893 authorized the City Manager to issue a Request for Unified Development Project Proposals for Phase I of the Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Project; and WHEREAS, proposals were received and evaluated by a certified public accounting firm and by a selection review committee appointed by the City Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Manager considered the findings of the certified public accounting firm and the evaluations of the selection review committee and recommended development entities and proposals for acceptance for the Phase I development parcels; and WHEREAS, the City Commission by Resolution No. 85-393 approved the City Manager's recommendation of Circa/Barness/Sawyer, a General Partnership, as the development entity to develop Parcel No. 45, Parcel No. 55 and Parcel No. 56 of the Phase I Redevelopment Area in accordance with the development proposal submitted and in compliance with the Unified Development Project procedures as set forth in the City of Miami Charter, Section 53(c); and CITY COMMISSION MEETING OF FEB 18 1988 138-15'7 ='=_`r -=q WHEREAS, the City Commission by Resolution No. 85-393, k directed the City Manager to negotiate a land disposition b agreement with Circa/Barness/Sawyer, a General Partnership, and 3 to present the negotiated agreement to the City Commission for approval; and i WHEREAS, the City Commission by Resolution No. 87-141.1, y approved the land disposition agreement with Circa/Barness/Sawyer, a General Partnership; and WHEREAS, it was the City Commission's intent that the land disposition agreement with Circa/Barness/Sawyer, a General Partnership, was subject to the following requirements: 1. The City must obtain a satisfactory residual reuse appraisal specifying that the rental payments due under the agreement are not less than fair value for the uses in accordance with the Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Plan. _ 2. Circa/Barness/Sawyer, a General Partnership, must initiate construction within one year of the February 12, 1987 City Commission approval of the land disposition agreement. 3. The City Manager must review the development entity's Minority Participation Plan to insure that all major subcontractors have been identified and that sufficient evidence have been provided concerning efforts to meet the City's minority participation goals for the Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Project; and WHEREAS, due to unforeseen financial and administrative obstacles, it has been impossible for Circa/ Barness/Sawyer, a General Partnership, to start construction one year from February 12, 1987, the date the City Commission approved the land disposition agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. Circa/Barness/Sawyer, a General Partnership, is hereby authorized to extend the deadline for initiation of construction to June 15, 1988, for Parcel No. 55 of the Southeast 00 Page 2 l98-157 Overtown/Park West Phase I Redevelopment Project; said extension to be made part of the land disposition agreement between the City of Miami, and Circa/Barness/Sawyer, a General Partnership. 1/ Section 2. The City Commission hereby declares that if Circa/Barness/Sawyer, a General Partnership has not commenced construction by June 15, 1988, its development rights for Parcels No. 45, 55, and 56 in Phase I of the Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Project are null and void. Section 3. The execution of the land disposition agreement between the City of Miami and Circa/Barness/Sawyer, a General Partnership, will remain subject to the following requirements: a. The City must obtain a satisfactory residual reuse appraisal specifying that the rental payments due under the agreement are not less than fair value for the uses in accordance with the Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Plan. b. The City Manager must review the development entity's Minority Participation Plan to insure that all major subcontractors have been identified and that sufficient evidence have been provided concerning efforts to meet the City's minority participation goals for the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Project. ® PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 18th day of February,, 1988• A building permit must be obtained by June 15, 1988; further, unless 169 residential units are completed by June 15, 1990, the development entity shall be required to show cause why a payment of $1,000 should not be as— sessed for each day thereafter until said units ha been comp a TIN d. ATTEST• t_ { X� AVIER L. S Z, MAYOR Lyp- MATTY HIRAI, CITY CLERK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: ROBERT F. CLARK CHIEF DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY M CITY FORM AND CORRECTNESS: . DOUGHERTY J Page 3 138-157 Submitted into the public record i n :*-" Ih item on --OW/ Matty Hirai Ci.tsT C��.is A STATEMENT FROM ST. JOHN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT' CORPORATION PRESENTED BY DONALD F. BENJAMIN, AICP EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO THE CITY OF MIAMI CITY COMMISSION THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 189 1988 r � t Mvi7oi1 Submitted into the puviiL record in connection with A STATEMENT FROM THE ST. JUHN CUMMUNITY DEYELOPMNIT COR ORATION & Matty Ifirai Mr. Mayor and City Commissioners: City Clerk My name is Donald F. Benjamin. I live at 417 N.W. 6th Street in Uvertown in the City of Miami. I am the past president of the Uvertown Advisory Board and I am now the Chairman of the Planning Advisory Board of the City of Miami. However, I come to address you today as the Executive Director of the St. John Community Development Corporation in Uvertown. The Board of Directors of the St. John Community Development Corporation at its last meeting authorized me to appear before this City Commission to express itsconcerns about the state of the Southeast Uvertown Park West Project. There have been delays and delays and delays and more delays. And every delay has been the lack of the capacity of the selected developers to get their financing , in place. We do not wish to interfere in the detailed development relationships between the City and specific developers -- which are certainly already difficult enough for both parties due to weak local financial support and market conditions. ` But we do wish to express sympathy for the City because of its financial exposure and potential inability to draw down the UDAG grant funds already approved by HUD if there is extensive delay in going forward with the projects or if withdrawal of private developer commitments occurs in those specific projects for which UDAG monies were designated. It is clear to us that there is a great deal to be desired which make us aware of the continued uncertainties of the development in this project. Never- theless we are strongly supportive of both the SE Uvertown/Park West market -rate housing endeavors and the Arena. --At the same time, we wish to file a statement of deep concern, as well as offering help in solving some of the problems of concern. The most critical current problems are: 99-156. W to this Commission. May I remind you that it is this Commission which provided the funds from the Off -Street Parking Authority for the St. John Community Development Corporation to undertake the assignment. So we are hopeful that you would be interested in the results. 2. Reserve later phase sites to be assigned to other stronger devel- opers, or to be awarded later to 1st Phase developers as incentives for successful implementation of their initial sites. Try to accelerate all development with the synergistic effects of paral- lel housing offerings and other support activity. 3. In the event that either of the 3 sites closest to the Uvertown Station and Arena (i.e., Sites 37, 45, & 56) are not able to go forward promptly with currently assigned developers and plans, St. John Community Development Corporation requests the opportunity et al to help assemble a capable alternative developer/investor • r•1 dteam i. and, through it, put together a feasible/realistic package x v U of mixed -use residential, commercial, and parking facilities .o U development. In such event, St. John Community Development o Corporation would work closely with directly concerned parties o Q v (e.g., the Sawyers in Uvertown and Patrinely of Decoma), the •� business community and the City to make an earlier and economically Ao •� feasible start toward the commercial support facilities which will attract and give confidence to the Arena's potential patrons and new residents; this has universally been a significant pre- requisite for success in center city market -rate housing endeavors across the U.S. The availability of these support services, as well as the inherent jobs and business opportunities for existing Uvertown residents, cannot be left to the schedule convenience 3' 4KZ 98-157 M (a) Protracted housing project start-up delays and slow build -out phasing, (b) weakly financed housing ventures, lacking the local lending in- stitution and developers support which most successful center city market housing action programs have put in place, and (c) conflicts of sites, land use, and transportation priorities stemming from the lately defined Arena parking requirements and the fragmented planning responsibilities for responding effectively. '4 d Developer timing and site options. It makes no sense to grant weakly q 5 U financed projects not only further extensions of time to start con- 0 C struction but also the opportunity to hold on to multiple parcel devel- (D p opment rights for long-term build -out at a leisurely pace (e.g. Cruz .4 o o or Circa-Barness, each with 3 sites). More logical actions are recom- v Q.� �° mended as follows: F o 1. Grant modest time extensions for the early sites and bring in ..qq tj I strong local public and private support for the marketability and investment package. This will keep existing developers in place for purposes of the draw down of UDAG monies while rein- forcing their abilities to perform. An encouraging feature which will have direct positive effect on this project is the renewed interest of the New World Center Action Committee of the Greater Miami Chamber of Commerce which has undertaken to do everything possible to make this project work. Another encouraging feature is the work that is being sponsored by the St. John Community Development Corporation which has contracted with the Florida Center for Urban Design and Research to prepare development action plans and programs for the Metrorail Station sites at the Uvertown and the Culmer Stations. These -development action plans will be completed in April and will be presented 2. Q* F�--157. 199-156. ems' to this Commission. May I remind you that it is this Commission which provided the funds ' from the Off -Street Parking Authority for the St. John Community Development Corporation to undertake the assignment. So we are hopeful that you would be interested in the results. 2. Reserve later phase sites to be assigned to other stronger devel- opers, or to be awarded later to lst Phase developers as incentives for successful implementation of their initial sites. Try to accelerate all development with the synergistic effects of paral- lel housing offerings and other support activity. 3. In the event that either of the 3 sites closest to the Overtown Station and Arena (i.e., Sites 37, 45, & 56) are not able to go forward promptly with currently assigned developers and plans, St. John Community Development Corporation requests the opportunity et al to help assemble a capable alternative developer/investor and, through it, put together a feasible/realistic package q '3 vteam Go U of mixed -use residential, commercial, and parking facilities p' 0 C' d ' development. In such event, St. John Community Development X :, 0Corporation U O would work closely with directly concerned parties 4.9 o (e.g., the Sawyers in Uvertown and Patrinely of Decoma), the ,a v business community and the City to make an earlier and economically ofeasible start toward the commercial support facilities which �= will attract and give confidence to the Arena's potential patrons and new residents; this has universally been a significant pre- requisite for success in center city market -rate housing endeavors across the U.S. The availability of these support services, as well as the inherent jobs and business opportunities for existing Uvertown residents, cannot be left to the schedule convenience 3.44 m, I �i 0 4­ .0 rd' ' for profit-taking by the current developers as has been suggested o0 o to be the reasons for delaying development adjacent to the transit 0 U station -- all must work together to make this concept happen sooner, �= •r4 thus accelerating the patronage for housing, Arena, and transit 't3 A o facilities. 14 It is therefore in this respect that we urge you to be cautious about the commitment of these lands for development which has not been able to take place and which may just result in holding on to the land without being able to implement any development. Our interest is in those blocks adjacent to the Overtown Station between N.W. 1st Court and N.W. 2nd Avenue and N.W. 6th Street and N.W. 9th Street. Please give the St. John Community Development Corporation the oppor- tunity to include these blocks in the development action plan for the Uvertown Station Site and the opportunity to attract substantial developers to work with US. Mr. David Crane, FAIA, AICP is our Consultant Project Director. Mr. Crane is an established Architect* and Planner with a national and international reputation. He has a long record of putting together public/private joint develop- ment ventures. Mr. Crane's professional credentials and potential roles are outstand- ing in the packaging of alternative investment/development team and creating a high quality, feasible design and public -private investment package. We are extremely hopeful that the Florida Center under David Crane's leadership will make a difference for the redevelopment and revitalization of the Uvertown Station Site and the adjacent lands. St. John Community Development Corporation would, quite naturally play a supportive role in such a venture in order to assure appropriate economic benefits to the overall Overtown community. 4. ". --1.57 9.9-15s It should be noted that there have been interesting precedents for CDC's participating as limited or special interest partners in UDAG- financed mixed -use projects. Most notable was San Antonio's Riverfront Hyatt Regency Hotel. The Mexican American Unity Council (MAUC) was made a limited partner in the deal via UDAG grants passed through the City to them and then loaned into the project as a 2nd trust mortgage. MAUC was the monitor and recipient of the loan repayment, and they also received equity interests for work performed for the benefit of the Project. This work included the finding, assignment and monitoring performance of employees and businesses to fulfill federal minority participation requirements. When the deal was put together in the late '10's, MAUC was expected to receive a 20-25 year cash flow of well over $25 million to be reinvested in other community projects. Resolution of Arena parking, transit, housing and land use conflicts. At the "llth hour" the NBA has imposed a requirement for 5 to 10 year ,d guarantees of off-street parking in the amount of 4,500 spaces to A support the success of the Miami Heat basketball franchise. If accomo-r p� o � ? dated in single -purpose parking facilities, this would amount to approx- U imately 31-37 acres of parking surfaces in temporary lots or in more 4" a efficient/costly parking decks. The City is apparently moving with ... v 6,alacrity to respond to these demands through its Off -Street Parking � .� Department, but the collateral priorities for housing and economic ' o development are clearly going to suffer according to the proposals we have seen so far. The Overtown organizations which I represent are particularly concerned with the proposal to allocate all of the pro- posed housing sites west of the Metrorail system in S.E. Overtown (i.e., sites #25, 36, 45 and 56) to "temporary surface parking for 5 to 10 years.'.This proposal has several very negative/potential effects on the success of the residential and economic development objectives, 5. R 99-1.57 M 99-1ss, including the following: - Early -phase housing start-up activities in the Indian River and Circa-Barness-Sawyer sites (i.e., parcels #46 and 55) will have the I-95 expressway on their west flank. It will be a small and isolated housing initiative separated from its primary access and support acitivity zone by a walk with both perceived and actual dangers after dark. - The interim surface parking lot uses adjacent to the Metrorail station also thwarts the opportunity for building a mixed -use component on a timely basis. This would deprive the Arena and housing users of needed support facilities, as well as reducing opportunity for transit patronage from walk-in users. The better alternative is to build a Wpermanent parking deck for Arena and mixed -use center joint use, at the same time emphasizing convenient pedestrian - transit connections. o �� V The St. John Community Development Corporation and its consultant would o welcome the opportunity to work with The Miami Heat, the Off -Street o 0 o Parking Department and the Department of Development on creative alter- U b 0 natives for a response to the NBA without penalizing housing, economic o development and transit priorities. The FLORIDA CENTER has requested U and is awaiting further information from the Off -Street Parking Depart- ment on the proposed parking distribution, and it is prepared to offer constructive solution options for discussion. Concluding message: Both those who participated in the historic black culture and community of Overtown and those who have been left behind by neighborhood destruction have a tremendous stake in what happens in the area from now on, both within and beyond the City's current redevelopment project boundary. This community has never had a meaningful role in the planning and developemnt process: that must change if the 6. Asa-15'�. 98"-15f ��z market -rate housing and Arena initiatives are to be successful. In operation for little more than a year, St. John Community Development Corporation is already an active participant in economic development and new and renovated housing to address this community's needs. We are working now with several consultants such as Policy Management Associates from Boston; Growth and Conservation, Inc. from Miami: the Greater Miami Neighborhoods, Inc.; Greater Miami United and the Florida Center for Urban Design and Research toward identify- ing an expanded priority action agenda for economic development, cultural restora- tion, balanced and affordable housing for all groups, elimination of blight, and more attention to the area's severe social problems. These issues will not be addressed as isolated neighborhood concerns but as problems greatly affecting the sound economic growth and social -cultural vitality of Downtown Miami, as well as issues which affect the fuller utilization of Metrorail transit facilities. We will be proposing a greater partnership of the Uvertown community with the Miami private sector and City and Metro -Dade governments. The proposed agenda and structure will be ready in a preliminary form for review and discussion within 6-8 weeks. We are convinced that self-sufficient, community -based development capability can been created and that tangible support can be offered to the marketing success and attractiveness of S.E. Uvertown/Park West. Submitted into the public record in connection with itemaA ---- on i I Matty Hirai City Clerk 98-157 M 98-i56 /j LLww FLORIDA CENTER for Urban Design & Research A C000erative Public Seance Insbtute of the University of South Florida in Assoa t an with: Florida A & M University • University of Flonaa • Flonda Slate University Aiverstde Plata, 100 W. Kennedy eculevard. Suite 310. Tampa. Florida 33602 • (813) 974-4042 DAVID A. CRANE, FAH , AICP. DIRECTOR: CAREER SYNOPSIS Development of the FLORIDA CENTER for Urban Design & Research began in the Fall of 1986 with the appointment of David A. Crane, FAIR, AICP as its first Director. Mr. Crane also serves as Professor of Architecture in the new graduate degree program being created at the University of South Florida with the advice and assistance of the Florida A & M University School of Architecture. To these challenging enterprises yr. Crane brings distinctive achieve- ments in the areas of private design and planning practice, public service, and architectural and urban planning education. He received international recognition in the early 160's, both for his original publications and teaching on modern theories and practice of urban design, and for his work as the chief architect -planner for Boston's extraordinary redevelopment programs under the Collins -Logue reform administration. He went on, in Philadelphia, to start one of the first U. S. consult- ing firms focussed on urban design. This firm, which was active 1965-79 and eventually became a corporate partnership identified as David A. Crane and Partners, charted new ground for the involve- ments of U.S. architects in large-scale urban environment issues, such as: manufactured housing technology; transportation design; historic areas and natural environment conservation; comprehensive residential revitalization; and new towns and multi -use development. The firm received numerous national and regional awards for design and planning excellence. Mr. Crane's innovations in practice were reinforced by his parallel educational activities in four leading universities. At the Univer- sity of Pennsylvania (1957-61 and 1965-72) he led in the development of the nation's `first formal graduate training in urban design. During his tenure as Rice University's Dean of Architecture (1972-77) that school was ranked among the top ten U.S. schools. Also active in public af!airs, he marshalled private business and civic support for the establishment of the Rice Center for Community Design and Research, Rice Design alliance and other successful organizations which grew to be significant forces in raising Houston's planning and design quality awareness. Involvement in Third World urban problems has been an important coun- ter -point to Mr. Crane's professional work in the U.S. An interna- tional outlook was gained from his childhood in Af_:.ca. Experience gained both in his early employment in New York and in his own fi:-:a's Florida Center is an Affirmative Aeti=Equal Opportunity Employer moll Qrj C5 . A2Rs-IR r I projects covers a umber of developing coUntr",es of Africa, diddle East, Asia, and Lin America. while in Hou. on he assisted his fi�n's master planning for Sadat City, a new city in the Eycpt4an desert to provide jobs and housing for 500,000 people. Zn 1978-79 he directed the first phase of Sadat City development and construction through an international joint venture office in Cairo, and he parti- cipated in other real estate development for ;diddle East clients. Advancing state-of-the-art strategies for implementing urban design and economic development projects has been another important overall theme of Mr. Crane's career. In advisory roles to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, as well as in major projects in the 170's for American "Sunbelt" cities, he contributed to the emer- ging "public -private partnerships" techniques of develooment organi- zation, cc -financing, and other private enterprise incentives. These interests were carried forward in Boston after 1979 with a practice that fully integrated design activity with urban policy/man- agement planning and development packaging services. The completed work generated permanent corporations and investment capacities to carry out partnership development in such programs as: comprehensive downtown CBD revitalization; close -in neighborhood and housing action programs; touristic/multi-use redevelopment; and business/industrial park redevelopment. Mr.'Crane's plans for Winston-Salem, N. C. during 1983-84, which included a county -wide economic development and growth management strategy and the 1984-95 Central area action Plan are being implemented now with notable success. Through his present engagement with FLORIDA CENTER, David Care is pursuing similarly challenging projects in Florida's dynamic urban growth scene, as well as other activities of international scope. r N /1 98-15fi A 98-15'7 •f �J� � ti DAvIC a_ C_AIJE_ _AIA_ QTCP: RESUME poc=ENT D I pE_'C- , . -'?R I OA = or ';rtan Oes i ,gn resear_n , FCSI_?ON R:versice Plaza, 100 A. Kennedv Slve.,=s.iite =.0, Tamoa, Florida 33602 Professor of Architecture, Master of Arc`i i tecture Program at the Universit-,/ of South Florida, Tamca, FL =cEVIof-is Princioal, Crane Consulting Grouo, ?cston. "!A. cQF==-iQNAL =-6). o_n__c_I;=QNS President, CST/Crane Associates of Boston, MA., a corp- orate joint venture for practice in planning, urban tesion and development services; and President of its predecessor firm, Crane Associates, Inc., also of Boston (19E0-e4). Director, Sadat City Development Grouo, Cairo, Egypt (197B-79). An office of 125 professionals -from the international consortium of: David A. Crane and Part- ners of Philadelphia; Marcel Breuer Associates, Architects of New York City; Parsons Brinckerhoff _ International, Inc., Engineers, of New York; and Sabbour Associates, Architects and Engineers of Cairo. Senior Partner and Chairman, David A. Crane Partners/- DACP, Inc., of Philadelphia; Houston and Boston (1974- 79). Principal of predecessor Crane firms in Phila- delphia, PA (1965-74). Planning Administrator and Director of Design Boston Redevelopment Authority, Boston, MA (1961-65). Free-lance urban design and site planning consultant at Philadelphia, PA (195e-61). Architectural designer, site planner, and project coor- dinator in Cambridge, Massachusetts architectural firms, including: Carl Kocn Associates; and D. 2. McMullin and Associates (195E-57). Architectural designer, site planner and project coor- oinator in New York City architectural and planning firms, including: ISE= Housing Corporation; Marcel c4. ' WN-1 Breuer, Architect; ;ose Luis Ser. and P. L. Weine- (Town Planning Associates); and ^laver. Ah:t:lessev. ano Glass, Architects (19E2-255). Assistant Director for Urban Redevelooment, Housing Authority of the City of Tamoa, Florida (1951). Other temporary special advisor and task =orce roles, including: o Senior Advisor to Community Planning_ and Deveiooment Division, U.S. Dept. of HUD for the UDAG Program and related private urban reinvestment initiatives (1977). Senior Advisor to Office of Public Partnersnios at HUD (1979-90). o Member of independent task force to evaluate and re- define planning, public works design, and redevelop- ment programs for City of New York administration of Mayor Sohn V. Lindsay (1966-67). o Member of independent task force to evaluate programs of the Puerto Rica Planning Hoard (1963). ep-E- OUS Dean of Architecture and Distinguished Professor of ' ACADEMIC Architecture, Rice University, Houston, Texas (1972-77). POSITIONS �. Founding Chairman of the Hoard and President, Rice ! Center for Community Design and Research, Houston, Texas (1973-77). Professor of Architecture and Urban Design, and pre- viously Associate Professor and Chairman of the Graduate Program in Urban Design, all at Graduate School of Fine Arts, University of Pennsylvania (1965-72) Assistant Professor of Architecture and Planning, University of Pennsylvania, Coordinator of Pennsyl- vania's Graduate Program in Urban Design (1957-61). visiting professorsnips in architecture and urban design, including: Harvard Graduate School of Design (1957 and 1970); University of Capetown and University of Witwaterstrand (1965). Research Assistant and Coordinator of "Form of the City Project," School of Architecture and Planning, MIT (1955-56), resulting in Kevin A. Lynch's Image of the C i t y-- /y1 �i8-iSf�: r" 1 --` EsUCa_ICN Davidson. College, Liberal Arts ( lac._-...►. :,a-y 7 ) . Georgia institute of Technology, Sacnelor of=cience, Bachelor of Architecture (19EO). Harvard University Graduate School of Design, Master of City Planning (1952). PoCF=-=SICNAL National Council of Architectural Pegistration ?cam s, L-M� z*CA_1CNP Certi 'icato No. 1 i,"'416. Currently, Registered Architect in Massachusetts and Pennsylvania. MEt�BEPSHIPS 8Fellow of the American Institute of Architects, former P4DF==�ID(VPI. Director, Philadelphia Chapter, AIA (1971-72). SERV-ICES `".ember, American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) and APA. Past Member, National Architectural Ac=rediting Board (19613-71); National Association of !-lousing and Re- develooment Officials; National Urban Coalition, and International Downtown Executives Association. Member of numerous design awards and competition juries, such as Progressive Architecture National Design Awards, New York City's Bard Awards, American Institute of Architects (national & local levels), etc. Program Coordinator, "The Architect and the City," seminar at Cranbrook Academy, Michigan and publication sponsored by AIA and ACSA (1962). LECTURES - U. S. Oecartment of State Cultural Exchange Delegate to PUBLICATIONS .:apan, 1967, for "Man in the City Conference" at Kyoto, co-soonsored by Asahi Shimbun Newspager ana U. S. Emoassy. . U. =. International Communications Agency Guest Lac- turer on Uroan Affairs for: Kuwait, Tehran and Beirut (197Z); Amman (1978); Bangkok and Singapore (1979). Guest Speaker for Brookings Institute Urban Policy Conference, 1962-64, various cities. Numerous other guest lectures before general public, professional and university audiences in the U.S. and overseas. Author of many professional articles, research monographs, and professional reports. (See separate "List of Publications"). 3 �� . y,. -..ram-... _...-......�. ..� .—v..-_. Sim 3 ' HONORS_ 4ZtiD P.ec.o_ent to Tau Beta Pi s "`!dung En e t ' � g.ne r of he Year AWARDS citation (1950) and its comoetitive national fellowship award for graduate studies at Harvard, as well as num- erous collegiate honors for academic. ieadershic and .rofessional performance. Italian Government Travelling =eilow in Architecture and Town Planning (1954-=5), for studies of European townscaoes. Design Awards: NEA/US007 Design f-_r Transportation Award, 19S2, for Charleston Visitors Receotion and Transportation Center. Progressive Architecture Awards Program, 1969, 1970; Philadelphia AIA Awards Program, 1969, 1970; Texas Society of Architects Awards Program, 1974. Honorable Mention (with Mitchell and Giurgola, Architects), Franklin D. Roosevelt Memorial Comoetition, 1960. Exhibitions: Fort Lincoln New Town Plan, Corcoran Gallery, Washington, D.C. (1969); Radisson New Town Plan, in exhibit of New York State Urban Develooment Corporation Projects, Whitney Museum, New York (1972). Past listings in Who's Who in America_ Who's Who in the Sast.L etc . NOUNAI Born of missionary parents and early schooling in the Belgian Congo (now Republic of Zaire). World War II service in U.S. Navy, Pacific Theatre. Married Bonnie B. Loyd of Jacksonville, FL and San Antonia, TX, present owner/Director of Crane Collection Gallery of American Painting, Boston, MA. 4 Al ss-156. �8-1-7 CITY OF MIAMI. FLORIDA INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM REVISED TO Honorable Mayor and Members DATE: of the City Commission SUBJECT. FROM REFERENCES: Cesar H. Odi F_ City Manager ENCLOSURES: RECOMMENDATION: January 27, 1988 nLc: Cotvnencement of Construction Extension for Circa/Harness/ Sawyer, a General Partnership, Southeast Overtown/Park West - Phase I February 11, 1988 City Commission Meeting It is respectfully recommended that the Miami City Commission approve the attached resolution extending the deadline for the initiation of construction to June i5, 1988 for Parcel No. 55 of the Southeast Overtown/Park West -Phase I, Land Disposition Agreement between the City of Miami and circa/ Barness/sawyer, a General Partnership; and further declaring that if said construction dateline is not met, Circa/Barness/Sawyer, a General Partnership; looses its development rights in Parcel 45, 55 and 56 of said project. The Department of Development recommends this extension based on efforts made by the developer to secure financing to initiate this project. A status report on this development project is attached herein. BACKGROUND: The Department of Development recommends the proposed. extension, based on the efforts made to'date by the developers and the City of Miami, to implement this project. The Miami City Commission (Resolutions 85-393 and 85-478) and Dade County (Resolution R- 999-65) selected Phase I developers for the Southeast Overtown/Park West Project. Pursuant to this approval the City initiated the acquisition of 71 remaining parcels in the 2b + acre Phase I redevelopment area. The relocation and demolition of the last structure occurred in July 1987. During the last 3 years the City has aggressively worked to assist the developers with additional support for their projects. These efforts have resulted in the following financial support for the project: $5,600,000 - UDAG Grant- Cruz Development and $4,500,000 $1,500,000 Associates, LTD. - UDAG Grant- Can -American Realty Corporation - Dade County Surtax Loan- Cruz Development and Associates - Dade -County Surtax Loan- Circa%Barness/Sawyer, a General Partnership y70 t Moro SS-iss, '\' 9e-1s7 r r Honorable Mayor and Members of the City.Commission January 27, 1988 Page 2 $7,500#000 - CD Float- Circa/Barness/Sawyer, General Partnership $ 5441000 - CD Float Loan- Indian River Investments $1,000,000 - Surtax Homeownership Loan- Indian River investment - Favorable Consideration 1986 Tax Act The Miami City Commission approved the disposition agreements for Indian River by Resolution No. 86-110 adopted February 13, 1986; Can American by Resolution No. 86-952, adopted November 25, 1986; Circa/Barness/Sawyer by Resolution No. 87-141.1, adopted February 12, 1987; and Cruz Development and Associates, LTD., Resolution No. 87-141, adopted also on February 12, 1987. In approving the development agreements, the City Commission required that Circa/ Barnes s/Sawyer, a General Partnership, Cruz Development and Associates, LTD., and Can -American Realty Corporation, initiate construction within one year of the date of Commission approval which was February 12, 1987. The other developer is expected to initiate construction in a timely manner. As of this date the status of the Phase I development projects is as follows: Developer: Circa/Harness/Sawyer, a General Partnership Development: The Odessa - Parcel 55 East Status: Bidding is currently underway and the project is being reviewed for FHA Co -Insurance by Poller Mortgage/R.J. McClendon Co. A favorable reply anticipated. Ground Breaking is scheduled for late March/early April. Developer: Can -American Realty Corporation Development: Park Place West Status: Plans have been completed to the Design: Development Phase and the developer is negotiating for Equity Financing with a local investor. The successful conclusion of this will allow related aspects of the projects financing to take place and Ground Breaking is therefore anticipated in May 1988. Developer: Cruz Development and Associates, Ltd. Development: Biscayne View Apartments Status: Negotiations (which include the amount of the mortgage) are currently underway with FHA for completion of FHA Insurance for the entire project. Assuming a successful conclusion Ground Breaking is anticipated in march 1988. K A8-156. 88-157 P r Honorable Mayor and Members of the City.Commission January 27, 1988 Page 2 $7,500,O00 - CD Float- CircajBarness/Sawyer, General Partnership $ 500,000 - CD Float Loan- Indian River Investments $1,000,000 - Surtax Homeownership Loan- Indian River Investment - Favorable Consideration 1986 Tax Act The Miami City Commission approved the disposition agreements for Indian River by Resolution No. 86-110 adopted February 13, 1986; Can American by Resolution No. 86-952, adopted November 25, 1986; Circa/Barness/Sawyer by Resolution No. 87-141.18 adopted February 12, 1987; and Cruz Development and associates, LTD., Resolution No. 87-1411 adopted also on February 12, 1987. In approving the development agreements, the City Cor►imission required that Circa/ Barnes s/sawyer, a General Partnership, Cruz Development and Associates, LTD., and Can -American Realty Corporation, initiate construction within one year of the date of Commission approval which was February 12, 1987. The other developer is expected to initiate construction in a timely manner. As of this date the status of the Phase I development projects is as follows: Developer: Circa/Barness/Sawyer, a General Partnership Development: The Odessa - Parcel 55 East Status: Bidding is currently underway and the project is being reviewed for FHA Co -Insurance by Poller Mortgage/R.J. McClendon Co. A favorable reply anticipated. Ground Breaking is scheduled for late March/early April. Developer: Can -American Realty Corporation Development: Park Place West Status: Plans 'nave been completed to the Design Development Phase and the developer is negotiating for Equity Financing with a local investor. The successful conclusion of this will allow related aspects of the projects financing to take place and Ground Breaking is therefore anticipated in May 1988. Developer: Cruz Development and Associates, Ltd. Development: Biscayne View Apartments Status: Negotiations (which include the amount of the mortgage) are currently underway with FHA for completion of FHA Insurance for the entire project. Assuming a successful conclusion Ground Breaking is anticipated in March 1988. Q 98-156i. 88••157 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission January 27, 1988 Page 3 Developer: Indian River Investments of Miami, Inc. Development: Poinciana Village Status: Bids from subcontractors are anticipated February 22, 1988. Assuming a favorable outcome Ground Breaking will be scheduled for late February or early March 1988. As a result. of the changes in the real estate syndication market stemming from the new 1986 Tax Act and a reluctance of the local banks to participate in this project, it was necessary for the Phase I developer to obtain FHA guaranteed financing which has slowed their progress in moving forth with construction. Based on the efforts made by the developers, the complexity of this project and investments made by the developers to date it is recommended that the date to initiate construction at Parcel 24 be extended to June 15, 1988, for Circa/Barness/Sawyer, a General Partnership. Attachment Proposed Resolution 3 88-156, 88-15'7 r SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN / PARK WEST REDEVELOPHEUT PROJECT MOVMY STATUS REPORT FOR JANUARY /1988 Developer: CIRCA BARNESS SAWYER Contact Person: William Wilson Telephone: (215) 843-v999 Barbara Bryan (202) 265-2270 Name of Development: The Odessa Parcel Number: 55 East I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. Number of Units in Phase I: 169 B. Type of Residential Units/ Mix: Type (Number) Square footage Proposed Rent 1. Studio (14) 367 $277/,81 4485 2. One Bedroom (84) 559 $321/440 *575-590 One Bedroom/Den Duplex (14) 776 $355/489 $590 3. Two Bedroom (57) 811 $395/544 $bd5/695 5. Other *Note: Rents in first column are for low/mod income residents. Lowest rent is for households with incomes at 80% of median and mid- range rent is for households with incomes at 80% of median. C. Commercial Square footage: 5000 (Phase I) D. Number of Parking Spaces: 160 N - 88-157 Circa Barness Sawyer Monthly Status Report Jan./1988 Page two E. Tenant "Amenities: Type Number Location 1. Service Clothes washer/dryer 4/2 each floor. Dishwasher 1 each unit. 2. Recreational Swimming pool 1 common area. Spa 1 common area. Landscaped deck 1 common area. II. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION A. 1. Source and Status of Financing: a) Dade County HFA Bonds Preliminary bond documents drafted; Final documents to be prepared when firm commitment for HUD' co-insurance is received. Final approval by Dade HFA Board and County Commission to follow. b) F.H.A. Co-insurance Application for FHA CO - insurance submitted to Puller mortgage/R.J. McClendon Co. Puller representatives have indicated a favorable response to providing co-insurance. c) Dade County Surtax Loan agreement drafted by Dade Loan County and is under review by Circa's attorney. 5 88-ILSS 98-15 7 Circa Barness Sawyer Monthly Status Report Jan./ 1988 Page three d) CD Float Loan Agreement prepared by City Attorney has been reviewed by Circa's attorney and submitted to Puller Mortgage Company for review. 2. Agreements: a) Disposition Agreement - The City is reviewing F.H.A. terminology B. Planning and Design Issues: Architects: Name/Address/Phone Ron Frazier Ron Frazier Associates 5800 NW 7th Avenue Miami, Florida J3127 (305) 754-0655 Jimmie Allen Allen & Associates 5940 SW 73rd St. #204 Miami, FL. 33143 (305) 661-7674 The Architectural Office of George Lopez 9485 SW 72nd St. #lU3 Miami, FL. 3314.3 Marik Interiors Miami, Fl. Engineers: Name/Address/Telephone Martinez & Associates and i4oreno & Assoc. 2025 SW 32nd Avenue Miami Fl. Miami, FL. 33145 (305) 448-7271 mo 7 C r, r Circa Barness Sawyer Monthly Status Report Jan./1988 Page four Landscape Architects: Other Nam e/ Addy es s / Tel ephon e Synterra Ltd. and Albert A. Eldridge, Inc. 628 W. Rittenhouse St. Philadelphia, PA. 19133 (215) 843-0700 Status/Schedule of Plans and Specifications: (monthly status report must be accompanied by one set of dated progress prints) STATUS PROPOSED COMPLETION DATE Schematic Design: Completed Design Development: Completed Construction Documents: Completed Dry -Run for Building Permits: In progress Mid Feb., 1968 Design Review -Development & Planning Depts: In Progress Special Zoning/Permitting Requirements: Class C completed Bidding: In progress Jan. 28, 1988 Ground Breaking: March/April/19aB Commencement of Construction: April, i988 Beneficial Occupancy: March, 1989 Completion of Construction: April, 1989 7 88-156, 98-157 Circa Barness Sawyer Monthly Status Report Jan./1988 -Page five C. STATUS•OF CONSTRUCTIUN CONTRACT: Name/Address of General Contractor: Anticipated to be determined by Feb. 15/88 Contact Person: To be determined Subcontractors: To be determined subsequent to the selection of the Prime Contractor, but prior to execution of the Agreement between the Developer and the General Contractor. Name/Address/Phone Trade Ethnicity Est. Contract Value 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. r.� 98-157 V W Circa Barness Sawyer Monthly Status Report Jan./1988 Page six List of Ongoing Problems/Issues and Proposed Resolution 1. Developer is being sent proposed terms of arena parking agreement as per Miami Commission Res. 87-1138, Sec. 2(c)., as requested. 2. Transfer of property from Dade County has been requested and a response is pending the N.B.A. Agreement negotiations. 3. The developer has requested an update on status of apartments on Max Bauer block. Appraisals recently received. One appraisal to be revised. Meeting scheduled with Off -Street Parking to determine disposition schedule. 4. Developer has requested a $330,000 short term loan to cover front end costs. Possible source is the Housing Bond Fund. The request has been submitted to the Law Department for review. 5. The developer has requested consideration of a cavas cover in lien of a solid roof over a portion of the top parking deck. The City has requested sketches illustrating the proposed design. 1/26/88 <seotpw>monthly/status/report R8'-156, 88-157