HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-88-0395J-SB- 201(a )
2/29/88
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION UPHOLDING THE ZONING BOARD'S
AFFIRMATION OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S
DECISION TO DENY CLASS C SPECIAL PERMIT,
FILE NO. C-87-755, FOR CONSTRUCTION IN RG-
2/2.2/7 AND SPI-4 ZONING DISTRICTS OF A
MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE TO BE
LOCATED AT 2475 BRICRELL AVENUE, MIAMI,
FLORIDA; AND ADOPTING AND INCORPORATING THE
FINDINGS OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR.
WHEREAS, the Miami Zoning Board at its meeting of
January 11, 1988, Item 1, adopted Resolution ZB 06-88 by an
eight to zero (8-0) vote, denying the appeal and affirming the
Planning Director's decision of October 14 1987, which denied a
Class C Special Permit as hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission after careful consideration of
this matter, deems it advisable and in the best interest of the
general welfare of the City of Miami and its inhabitants to
confirm the denial of said Class C Special Permit.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The findings of the Planning Director are
hereby adopted and incorporated herein by reference.
Section 2. The decision of the Zoning Board to uphold
the Planning Director's decision to deny Class C Special Permit,
File No. C-87-755 for construction in RG-2/2.2/7 and SPI-4 Zoning
Districts of a Multiple Family Residential Structure to be
located at 2475 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida, is hereby
affirmed.
CITY COMMISSION
MEETING OF
APR 28 1988 i
otcn111T10N N0.
�8-395
!BARKS
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of Aril 1988.
,..��►
ATT T:
<i1-
MA Y "I mr
City Clerk
PREPARED AND APPROVED M
14WOM62
MIRIAN MAER
Assistant City Attorney
APPROVP6 $S TO FORM AND CORRECTNESSs
r..&.v n. u
ity Attor
GMM/rcl/M6 38
RS-395
r
To: City of Miami Zoning Board
Re: Brickell Promenade Associates, Ltd.
The undersigned persons who reside at their respective
addresses set forth below wish to express to the City of
Miami Zoning Board their fervent opposition to the above
zoning appeal, which is from a denial by the Director of
the Planning Department of permission to violate the land
use plan of the City of Miami by developing a project of
272 units, with a maximum density of 160 units per net
acre, where 80 units per net acre is permitted by the Plan.
For the reasons expressed in the denial by the Director,
File No. C-87-755, the undersigned respectfully request
that the Zoning Board uphold the denial and reject the
appeal.
The parking and traffic problems that will be caused
by a development at more than twice the permitted density
of the land use plan will be a totally unwarranted intru-
sion into the lives of the undersigned residents and all
others who now happily reside in the area. Any granting
of the appeal would depreciate the property values of the
existing residences. Please reject this appeal so that
the investments of the multitude of owners in the area
remain secure.
NAME
OY
0 d
0 o
� N LA-
0
b
&C
Le- r7 �l�-CJ
ADDRESS
p //
Y s a4� - 4 ..
. e�
-�
t x `./J_t f✓
IJ q P 7
99-395
U
�y
/J
(75
3�
To: City of Miami Zoning Board
Re: Brickell Promenade Associates, Ltd.
The undersigned persons who reside at their respective
addresses set forth below wish to express to the City of
Miami Zoning Board their fervent opposition to the above
zoning appeal, which is from a denial by the Director of
the Planning Department of permission to violate the land
use plan of the City of Miami by developing a project of
272 units, with a maximum density of 160 units per net
acre, where 80 units per net acre is permitted by the Plan.
For the reasons expressed in the denial by the Director,
File No. C-87-755, the undersigned respectfully request
that the Zoning Board uphold the denial and reject the
appeal.
The parking and traffic problems that will be caused
by a development at more than twice the permitted density
of the land use plan will be a totally unwarranted intru-
sion into the lives of the undersigned residents and all
others who now happily reside in the area. Any granting
of the appeal would depreciate the property values of the
existing residences. Please reject this appeal so that
the investments of the multitude of owners in the area
remain secure.
k1
d
-,
iJ
f�
U
cr
NAME
l 1 "
ti s b 1 f � i
•` \I`,�
� O�ti Qua 'Los �e r
.ry
U
ADDRESS
0" S- A �V4
f ftr7
lad
s 6•� �4.� �� `i8-395
a
r
// ,
To: City of Miami Zoning Board
Re: Brickell Promenade Associates, Ltd.
The undersigned persons who reside at their respective
addresses set forth below wish to express to the City of
Miami Zoning Board their fervent opposition to the above
zoning appeal, which is from a denial by the Director of
the Planning Department of permission to violate the land
use plan of the City of Miami by developing a project of
272 units, with a maximum density of 160 units per net
acre, where 80 units per net acre is permitted by the Plan.
For the reasons expressed in the denial by the Director,
File No. C-87-755, the undersigned respectfully request
that the Zoning Board uphold the denial and reject the
appeal.
The parking and traffic problems that will be caused
by a development at more than twice the permitted density
of the land use plan will be a totally unwarranted intru-
sion into the lives of the undersigned residents and all
others who now happily reside in the area. Any granting
of the appeal would depreciate the property values of the
existing residences. Please reject this appeal so that
the investments of the multitude of owners in the area
remain secure.
NAM
ADDRESS
nf
1 2� 6 q / ` / ,.4N I )'_ 1 i1 j'
161-13e i r .c _f - P-H -
To: City of Miami Zoning Board
Re: Brickell Promenade Associates, Ltd.
The undersigned persons who reside at their respective
addresses set forth below wish to express to the City of
Miami Zoning Board their fervent opposition to the above
zoning appeal, which is from a denial by the Director of
the Planning Department of permission to violate the land
use plan of the City of Miami by developing a project of
272 units, with a maximum density of 160 units per net
acre, where 80 units per net acre is permitted by the Plan.
For the reasons expressed in the denial by the Director,
File No. C-87-755, the undersigned respectfully request
that the Zoning Board uphold the denial and reject the
appeal.
The parking and traffic problems that will be caused
by a development at more than twice the permitted density
of the land use plan will be a totally unwarranted intru-
sion into the lives of the undersigned residents and all
others who now happily reside in the area. Any granting
of the appeal would depreciate the property values of the
existing residences. Please reject this appeal so that
the investments of the multitude of owners in the area
remain secure.
NAME
A
ADDRESS
n
A8-395
To: City of Miami Zoning Board
Re: Brickell Promenade Associates, Ltd.
The undersigned persons who reside at their respective
addresses set forth below wish to express to the City of
Miami Zoning Board their fervent opposition to the above
zoning appeal, which is from a denial by the Director of
the Planning Department of permission to violate the land
use plan of the City of Miami by developing a project of
272 units, with a maximum density of 160 units per net
acre, where 80 units per net acre is permitted by the Plan.
For the reasons expressed in the denial by the Director,
File No. C-87-755, the undersigned respectfully request
that the Zoning Board uphold the denial and reject the
appeal.
The parking and traffic problems that will be caused
by a development at more than twice the permitted density
of the land use plan will be a totally unwarranted intru-
sion into the lives of the undersigned residents and all
others who now happily reside in the area. Any granting
of the appeal would depreciate the property values of the
existing residences. Please reject this appeal so that
the investments of the multitude of owners in the area
remain secure.
NAME
ADDRESS
I -6 , 1 ,
V/y
L-2 J
88=395
To: City of Miami Zoning Board
Re: Brickell Promenade Associates, Ltd.
The undersigned persons who reside at their respective
addresses set forth below wish to express to the City of
Miami Zoning Board their fervent opposition to the above
zoning appeal, which is from a denial by the Director of
the Planning Department of permission to violate the land
use plan of the City of Miami by developing a project of
272 units, with a maximum density of 160 units per net
acre, where 80 units per net acre is permitted by the Plan.
For the reasons expressed in the denial by the Director,
File No. C-87-755, the undersigned respectfully request
that the Zoning Board uphold the denial and reject the
appeal.
The parking and traffic problems that will be caused
by a development at more than twice the permitted density
of the land use plan will be a totally unwarranted intru-
sion into the lives of the undersigned residents and all
others who now happily reside in the area. Any granting
of the appeal would depreciate the property values of the
existing residences. Please reject this appeal so that
the investments of the multitude of owners in the area
remain secure.
NAME
IN
i
ADDRESS
88-395
To: city of Miami Zoninq Beard
Re: Brickell Promenade Associates, Ltd.
The undersigned persons who reside at their respective
addresses set forth below wish to express to the City of
Miami Zoning Board their fervent opposition to the above
zoning appeal, which is from a denial by the Director of
the Planning Department of permission to violate the land
use plan of the City of Miami by developing a project of
272 units, with a maximum density of 160 units per net
acre, where 80 units per net acre is permitted by the Plan.
For the reasons expressed in the denial by the Director,
File No. C-87-755, the undersigned respectfully request
that the Zoning Board uphold the denial and reject the
appeal.
The parking and traffic problems that will be caused
by a development at more than twice the permitted density
of the land use plan will be a totally unwarranted intru-
sion into the lives of the undersigned residents and all
others who now happily reside in the area. Any granting
of the appeal would depreciate the property values of the
existing residences. Please reject this appeal so that
the investments of the multitude of owners in the area
remain secure.
NAME
ADDRESS
R i it
r�
> ---6D
2` i
(9 V l ► C KF I I Air. f!' -- Ic, L"'
v
R8-395
To: City of Miami Zoning Board
Re: Brickell Promenade Associates, Ltd.
The undersigned persons who reside at their respective
addresses set forth below wish to express to the City of
Miami Zoning Board their fervent opposition to the above
zoning appeal, which is from a denial by the Director of
the Planning Department of permission to violate the land
use plan of the City of Miami by developing a project of
272 units, with a maximum density of 160 units per net
acre, where 80 units per net acre is permitted by the Plan.
For the reasons expressed in the denial by the Director,
File No. C-87-755, the undersigned respectfully request
that the Zoning Board uphold the denial and reject the
appeal.
The parking and traffic problems that will be caused
by a development at more than twice the permitted density
of the land use plan will be a totally unwarranted intru-
sion into the lives of the undersigned residents and all
others who now happily reside in the area. Any granting
of the appeal would depreciate the property values of the
existing residences. Please reject this appeal so that
the investments of the multitude of owners in the area
remain secure.
NAME
C' V�
.10
fig - a-,
U
0
ADDRESS
To: City of Miami Zoning Board
Re: Brickell Promenade Associates, Ltd.
The undersigned persons who reside at their respective
addresses set forth below wish to express to the City of
Miami Zoning Board their fervent opposition to the above
zoning appeal, which is from a denial by the Director of
the Planning Department of permission to violate the land
use plan of the City of Miami by developing a project of
272 units, with a maximum density of 160 units per net
acre, where 80 units per net acre is permitted by the Plan.
For the reasons expressed in the denial by the Director,
File No. C-87-755, the undersigned respectfully request
that the Zoning Board uphold the denial and reject the
appeal.
The parking and traffic problems that will be caused
by a development at more than twice the permitted density
of the land use plan will be a totally unwarranted intru-
sion into the lives of the undersigned residents and all
others who now happily reside in the area. Any granting
of the appeal would depreciate the property values of the
existing residences. Please reject this appeal so that
the investments of the multitude of owners in the area
remain secure.
/I
�1
NAME
ADDRESS
4) ':' �'_'
�- l a
l 1J1�
4_C 3
88-395
To: City of Miami Zoning Board
Re: Brickell Promenade Associates, Ltd.
The undersigned persons who reside at their respective
addresses set forth below wish to express to the City of
Miami Zoning Board their fervent opposition to the above
zoning appeal, which is from a denial by the Director of
the Planning Department of permission to violate the land
use plan of the City of Miami by developing a project of
272 units, with a maximum density of 160 units per net
acre, where 80 units per net acre is permitted by the Plan.
For the reasons expressed in the denial by the Director,
File No. C-87-755, the undersigned respectfully request
that the Zoning Board uphold the denial and reject the
appeal.
The parking and traffic problems that will be caused
by a development at more than twice the permitted density
of the land use plan will be a totally unwarranted intru-
sion into the lives of the undersigned residents and all
others who now happily reside in the area. Any granting
of the appeal would depreciate the property values of the
existing residences. Please reject this appeal so that
the investments of the multitude of owners in the area
remain secure.
NAME
d
Cn
ADDRESS
f cI 0 / / --!+%?I c kir Gc q,;zz ^ i ) - //
R8-395
r._"' r*I
To: City of Miami Zoning Board
Re: Brickell Promenade Associates, Ltd.
The undersigned persons who reside at their respective
addresses set forth below wish to express to the City of
Miami Zoning Board their fervent opposition to the above
zoning appeal, which is from a denial by the Director of
the Planning Department of permission to violate the land
use plan of the City of Miami by developing a project of
272 units, with a maximum density of 160 units per net
acre, where 80 units per net acre is permitted by the Plan.
For the reasons expressed in the denial by the Director,
File No. C-87-755, the undersigned respectfully request
that the Zoning Board uphold the denial and reject the
appeal.
The parking and traffic problems that will be caused
by a development at more than twice the permitted density
of the land use plan will be a totally unwarranted intru-
sion into the lives of the undersigned residents and all
others who now happily reside in the area. Any granting
of the appeal would depreciate the property values of the
existing residences. Please reject this appeal so that
the investments of the multitude of owners in the area
remain secure.
NAME
ADDRESS
/yam/ ""27 �.C�/ z3
R8-395
To: City of Miami Zoning Board
Re: Brickell Promenade Associates, Ltd.
The undersigned persons who reside at their respective
addresses set forth below wish to express to the City of
Miami Zoning Board their fervent opposition to the above
zoning appeal, which is from a denial by the Director of
the Planning Department of permission to violate the land
use plan of the City of Miami by developing a project of
272 units, with a maximum density of 160 units per net
acre, where 80 units per net acre is permitted by the Plan.
For the reasons expressed in the denial by the Director,
File No. C-87-755, the undersigned respectfully request
that the Zoning Board uphold the denial and reject the
appeal.
The parking and traffic problems that will be caused
by a development at more than twice the permitted density
of the land use plan will be a totally unwarranted intru-
sion into the lives of the undersigned residents and all
others who now happily reside in the area. Any granting
of the appeal would depreciate the property values of the
existing residences. Please reject this appeal so that
the investments of the multitude of owners in the area
remain secure.
NAME ADDRESS
y .1
0
N
R8-395
9
To: City of Miami Zoning Board
Re: Brickell Promenade Associates, Ltd.
The undersigned persons who reside at their respective
addresses set forth below wish to express to the City of
Miami Zoning Board their fervent opposition to the above
zoning appeal, which is from a denial by the Director of
the Planning Department of permission to violate the land
use plan of the City of Miami by developing a project of
272 units, with a maximum density of 160 units per net
acre, where 80 units per net acre is permitted by the Plan.
For the reasons expressed in the denial by the Director,
File No. C-87-755, the undersigned respectfully request
that the Zoning Board uphold the denial and reject the
appeal.
The parking and traffic problems that will be caused
by a development at more than twice the permitted density
of the land use plan will be a totally unwarranted intru-
sion into the lives of the undersigned residents and all
others who now happily reside in the area. Any granting
of the appeal would depreciate the property values of the
existing residences. Please reject this appeal so that
the investments of the multitude of owners in the area
remain secure.
NAME ADDRESS
K LA%1 5 4 18 5 UIXIC LL �►F hIAfA1 z IZ i
f 4e
a
ti
To: City of Miami Zoning Board
Re: Brickell Promenade Associates, Ltd.
The undersigned persons who reside at their respective
addresses set forth below wish to express to the City of
Miami Zoning Board their fervent opposition to the above
zoning appeal, which is from a denial by the Director of
the Planning Department of permission to violate the land
use plan of the City of Miami by developing a project of
272 units, with a maximum density of 160 units per net
acre, where 80 units per net acre is permitted by the Plan.
For the reasons expressed in the denial by the Director,
File No. C-87-755, the undersigned respectfully request
that the Zoning Board uphold the denial and reject the
appeal.
The parking and traffic problems that will be caused
by a development at more than twice the permitted density
of the land use plan will be a totally unwarranted intru-
sion into the lives of the undersigned residents and all
others who now happily reside in the area. Any granting
of the appeal would depreciate the property values of the
existing residences. Please reject this appeal so that
the investments of the multitude of owners in the area
remain secure.
ADDRESS
001 i del l pkae Y-�2' . L la
A9-395
To: City of Miami Zoning Board
Re: Brickell Promenade Associates, Ltd.
•
The undersigned persons who reside at their respective
addresses set forth below wish to express to the City of
Miami Zoning Board their fervent opposition to the above
zoning appeal, which is from a denial by the Director of
the Planning Department of permission to violate the land
use plan of the City of Miami by developing a project of
272 units, with a maximum density of 160 units per net
acre, where 80 units per net acre is permitted by the Plan.
For the reasons expressed in the denial by the Director,
File No. C-87-755, the undersigned respectfully request
that the Zoning Board uphold the denial and reject the
appeal.
The parking and traffic problems that will be caused
by a development at more than twice the permitted density
of the land use plan will be a totally unwarranted intru-
sion into the lives of the undersigned residents and all
others who now happily reside in the area. Any granting
of the appeal would depreciate the property values of the
existing residences. Please reject this appeal so that
the investments of the multitude of owners in the area
remain secure.
NAME
ADDRESS
V
f
To: City of Miami Zoning Board
Re: Brickell Promenade Associates, Ltd.
The undersigned persons who reside at their respective
addresses set forth below wish to express to the City of
Miami Zoning Board their fervent opposition to the above
zoning appeal, which is from a denial by the Director of
the Planning Department of permission to violate the land
use plan of the City of Miami by developing a project of
272 units, with a maximum density of 160 units per net
acre, where 80 units per net acre is permitted by the Plan.
For the reasons expressed in the denial by the Director,
File No. C-87-755, the undersigned respectfully request
that the Zoning Board uphold the denial and ieject the
appeal.
The parking and traffic problems that will be caused
by a development at more than twice the permitted density
of the land use plan will be a totally unwarranted intru-
sion into the lives of the undersigned residents and all
others who now happily reside in the area. Any granting
of the appeal would depreciate the property values of the
existing residences. Please reject this appeal so that
the investments of the multitude of owners in the area
remain secure.
NAME
ADDRESS
OZ
A
s
�
c�
�
� U
U
U
O
U
To: City of Miami Zoning board
Re: Brickell Promenade Associates, Ltd.
y
The undersigned persons who reside at their respective
addresses set forth below wish to express to the City of
Miami Zoning Board their fervent opposition to the above
zoning appeal, which is from a denial by the Director of
the Planning Department of permission to violate the land
use plan of the City of Miami by developing a project of
272 units, with a maximum density of 160 units per net
acre, where 80 units per net acre is permitted by the Plan.
Fur the reasons expressed in the denial by the Director.,
File No. C-87-755, the undersigned respectfully request
that the Zoning Board uphold the denial and reject the
appeal.
The parking and traffic problems that will be caused
by a development at more than twice the permitted density
of the land use plan will be a totally unwarranted intru-
sion into the lives of the undersigned residents and all
II -C; who now happily reside in the area. Any granting
.al would depreciate the property values of the
esidences. Please reject this appeal so that
tments of the multitude of owners in the area
cure.
NAME ADDRESS
V
I
To: City of Miami Zoning Board
Re: Brickell Promenade Associates, Ltd.
The undersigned persons who reside at their respective
addresses set forth below wish to express to the City of
Miami Zoning Board their fervent opposition to the above
zoning appeal, which is from a denial by the Director of
the Planning Department of permission to violate the land
use plan of the City of Miami by developing a project of
272 units, with a maximum density of 160 units per net
acre, where 80 units per net acre is permitted by the Plan.
For the reasons expressed in the denial by the Director,
File No. C-87-755, the undersigned respectfully request
that the Zoning Board uphold the denial and reject the
appeal.
The parking and traffic problems that will be caused
by a development at more than twice the permitted density
of the land use plan will be a totally unwarranted intru-
sion into the lives of the undersigned residents and all
others who now happily reside in the area. Any granting
of the appeal would depreciate the property values of the
existing residences. Please reject this appeal so that
the investments of the multitude of owners in the area
remain secure.
NAME
r�
ADDRESS
C
To: City of Miami Zoning Board
Re: Brickell Promenade Associates, Ltd.
The undersigned persons who reside at their respective
addresses set forth below wish to express to the City of
Miami Zoning Board their fervent opposition to the above
zoning appeal, which is from a denial by the Director of
the Planning Department of permission to violate the land
use plan of the City of Miami by developing a project of
272 units, with a maximum density of 160 units per net
acre, where 80 units per net acre is permitted by the Plan.
For the reasons expressed in the denial by the Director,
File No. C-87-755, the undersigned respectfully request
that the Zoning Board uphold the denial and reject the
appeal.
The parking and traffic problems that will be caused
by a development at more than twice the permitted density
of the land use plan will be a totally unwarranted intru-
sion into the lives of the undersigned residents and all
others who now happily reside in the area. Any granting
of the appeal would depreciate the property values of the
existing residences. Please reject this appeal so that
the investments of the multitude of owners in the area
remain secure.
NAME
-•-rQ 4
Q
0
ADDRESS
(1tSii (,(•LLB 1�'l.' �L�ti
V
To: City of Miami Zoning Board
Re: Brickell Promenade Associates, Ltd.
The undersigned persons who reside at their respective
addresses set forth below wish to express to the City of
Miami Zoning Board their fervent opposition to the above
zoning appeal, which is from a denial by the Director of
the Planning Department of permission to violate the land
use plan of the City of Miami by developing a project of
272 units, with a maximum density of 160 units per net
acre, where 80 units per net acre is permitted by the Plan.
For the reasons expressed in the denial by the Director,
File No. C-87-755, the undersigned respectfully request
that the Zoning Board uphold the denial and reject the
appeal.
The parking and traffic problems that will be caused
by a development at more than twice the permitted density
of the land use plan will be a totally unwarranted intru-
sion into the lives of the undersigned residents and all
others who now happily reside in the area. Any granting
of the appeal would depreciate the property values of the
existing residences. Please reject this appeal so that
the investments of the multitude of owners in the area
remain secure.
NAME
nm 1 S�_6T, pe 6
tir
ADDRESS
1 ° 01
Ae- z Iwj 4%a
Ale
8f, %,cLed,
�1t
\ a L-I-e
Uo
Rt; emu . , �ie
&61-;-
88-39b
F
PZw20
ZONING FACT SHEET
LOCATION/LEGAL 2475 Brickell Avenue
APPELLANT Brickell Promenade Associates, Ltd.
c/o Morris Deck el baum
2900 N Military Trail, Suite 2015
Boca Raton, FL 33431 Phone #t 994-2133
REQUEST Appeal by the applicant of the Class C Special
Permit, File No C-87-755, denied by the Planning
Director on October 14, 1987, for construction
in RG-2.20 and Sri-4 tuning districts of a
multiple family residential structure to be
located at 2475 Brickell Avenue.
RECOMMENDATIONS
PLANNING DEPARTMENT DENIAL. This Class C-87-755 Special Permit
appT c atton to build a multiple family
residential structure in RG-2.2/7 and SPI-4
districts was filed under the Schedule of
District Regulations; page 2 of 6, and Section
1540 - SPI-4 Brickell Area Major Streets Overlay
District of Zoning Ordinance 9500.
Section 2305 of Zoning Ordinance 9500 states
general considerations, standards, findings and
determinations required for special permits as
appropriate to the nature of the special permit
involved and the particular circumstances of the
case, in addition to any other standards and
requirements set forth concerning the class or
kind of permit being considered. In this
particular case, standards and requirements are
set forth for Class C Special Permits in the
Schedule of District Regulations, page 2 of 6,
for all development within this zoning
classification (RG-2.2) which states that the
intent of this zoning district is to allow high
intensity redevelopment in the form of
multifamily dwellings with maximum density to be
approximately 80 units per net acre.
SS-395
In addition, as a result of the 1986 Growth
Management Act, House Bill 287, the State
requires that local land development regulations
conform to the local comprehensive plan. Under
the administrative review procedures relating
to land development, a general toning code must,
therefore, conform to the local comprehensive
plan. The Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
of September 1985 designates this area as High
Density Residential intended to be developed at
a density of 80 units per net acre. lVe
MORE na proposal for this site, approved on
April 1st., 1982 by Permit #82-2723, proposed
112 units with a maximum density of
approximately 68 units per net acre.
Even though the present proposal does not exceed
the maximum Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.) allowed
for the district, the Land Use Intensity tables
are designed to establish maximum building
envelopes, and not minimum assured
densities/intensities. The application proposes
272 units with a maximum density of
approximately 167 units per net acre, which is
excessive and does not follow the intent of the
district or the Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
of September 1985.
The proposal does not follow the intent of the
district as far as -traffic is concerned: "High
intensity development in this district, as
related to traffic flow .on Brickell Avenue, can
be justified only if supplementary traffic
handling facilities are provided in connection
with new development". Since the number of
units is more than double of what is allowed in
the Zoning Ordinance, the number of parking
spaces that would be required would also be
double resulting in additional traffic; while no
supplementary traffic handling facilities are
included in the application.
The number of parking spaces provided in the
proposal does not follow the intent of Section
2305.2; even though the proposal follows the
iminimnnm Total Car Ratio of 1.1 parking spaces
per un t required in the Ordinance. Through
observations by staff and comments by neighbors,
it is apparent that there is parking overflow in
the area from existing projects, although they
have met minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements.
Therefore, for all practical purposes the
Planning Department would have recommended a
ratio of 1.5 parking spaces per unit if the
proposal were to fall within the maximums density
of units per acre allowed in the Ordinance.
8 -395
2,
6 f
The proposal is in conflict with Section
2306.7 - Control of potentially adverse effects
generally. Even though the proposal ie within
the maximum F.A.R. allowed in the Ordinance,
because the great majority of units proposed are
much smaller than what is predominant in the
area and the application exceeds the density (or
the number of units per acre in the Ordinance),
the proposal would potentially have a negative
imipact on adjoining and nearby properties, since
it is not compatible and harmonious with the
character of existing development.
PUBLIC WORKS Recommend denial of appeal. Sanitary Sewer were
constructed in 1962. Zoning at that time
allowed 50 units/net acre for site. Present
zoning allowing 80 units/net acre. Sewer can
handle this, but capacity in overall system is
marginal at this time. Recommend against
further exceeding original design parameters.
We are still reviewing traffic impact.
Additional comments will be made at the meeting.
DADE COUNTY PUBLIC
WORKS No comments.
ZONING BOARD At its meeting of December 7, 1987, the Zoning
Board adopted Resolution ZB 87-122 by a 5 to 4
vote continuing the item to January 11. 1988 at
the request of the applicant.
ZONING BOARD At its meeting of January 11, 1988, the Zoning
Board adopted Resolution 06-88, by a vote of
8-0, denying the appeal and upholding the
decision of the Planning Director.
APPEAL Letter from Gerald F. Richman and Michael E. Criden
dated January 15, 1988.
HISTORY
Zoning Board Meeting 10/5/81
REQUEST Variances to allow a 112-unit, 17-story
residential structure (floor area ratio, rear
yard, interior side yard, off-street parking
requirements). Elimination of the required 70'
service drive.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT Approval of variances and elimination of the
service drive.
ZONING BOARD Granted. Resolution ZB 179-81 and ZB 180-81.
Building Permit #82-2723 was granted on 4/1/82 for a 112-unit residential
structure, with a density of approximately 68 units per net acre.
i Standard Certificate of Approval was granted by the Heritage Conservation
Officer on 8/28/87 for a 272-unit residential structure..
SS-395
M
c
f
Eno dwm��"
SO
3
.0 9," =
RI e
0, 77
WSm
3!
'A i! ' N t •
1 ! ti 11 10 • N is 1>;
IY Q
Aft. -
• 2 x4 2424 i3 Li it !O 19 1• 17
Ill.fll4• •
r. BRIC`JCELLAV
77 1G
i N r
T Un V%
• n /7
m
m H p BAY GL
a SUBDIVI
A
� �s•
v pop
1Ax
N > 1 r
f�1 a
�-
�G� - -- E gA`C
IBIS
A8-39:.
ZB 12/7%`.) AS 37
AN 0-17
Item f 3 P-15
•14w—
,o -4 ���►
a
LAW OrrIC[S
FLOYO PEARSON RICHMAN GREER WEIL ZACK i BRUMBAUGH
114MVE6S10NAL ASSOCIATION
ONC SISCAYNC TOW[II
Memo"L •Le.e
$ev.. J.. n6tN
eMANLts. 1N.N/Aa0
NA.M •tANSON
6AN.S.t.tNSN.
6
TW[NTr•rl"" rLOO:
C.COIINttL
OCMALO • N/CNNIAN
OIANt WASNts NArUN
MIAMI. FLORIDA 33I3I-4664
.LAM s ONttN
J WN.t- mCN6
WANNCN L 001LLIL0 A C
WCONCTM J WtIL
NOsta? tANCO
GO COYNOt► O C
sn.»tN N SACK
tNNt$TO J. 66 LA ►t
309 377.0841
aunt loon
JOMN N aNUN111AU6M
NICNAtL A. MANlNAN
SROWARO aos 5:3-4867
1&" 16. sT NW
star" CLAIM Lite
$ALL. N. amomaR
WASNINGTON. O C R0036
.Noo"J•N1RA61.0
@WWt$TJ •IOst
TCLt11S99006•TRIAL
t0ltt3•6S6S
$ 0►061CL'ONCt
$NUCt A CM111$TtNatN
SUSAN A. LAMASN.
00"or C. 69VINt
January 15, 1988
..1gNst0A POW"Ce 1N
...Mr1s..N . C
OCOTT O $Mtr.ALL
ANONtw... •owNO
ENO
Mt RNAN J. NU$SONA./NO
0006$AN 6. 0006
•"t'-" 't e1•
.0146CS N JONNSON
NIc""L t COMEN
T"o"As NttNs
tOWAN6 N. NtwNAN
Otem^ W9108 oo00s oNt
Gloria Fox, Division Chief
Hearing Board Division
Building and Zoning Department
275 N.W. Second Street
P.O. Box 330708 - -_
Miami, Florida 33233-0708
Re: Appeal of Class C Special Permit C-87-755
Dear Gloria:
The purpose of this letter is to officially request an appeal of the
Zoning Board's January 11, 1988 decision denying Class C permit (C-87-755).
Brickell Promenade Associates Ltd. hereby requests an appeal before the Miami
City Commission pursuant to Article III Section 3000 of the Code.
In addition, as per our conversation, we would request that our appeal
before the Miami City Commission be on the March 1988 calendar, due to a
conflict in that counsel for Appellants will be in a three week trial in the
Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit of Florida in and for Palm
Beach County. The trial is set to start on Tuesday, February 16, 1988 (a copy
of the order setting trial is attached hereto).
As per your instructions I spoke with Miriam Mayer at the City
Attorney's office, and she informed me that there is no provision in the Code
which would require the appeal before the City Commission to be within any
specified amount of time following the denial of a Class C permit. I then
spoke with Aurielo Perez-Lugones at the Miami City Commission and he informed
me that if the March date was acceptable to you, it would be acceptable to him.
Therefore, we would request the appropriate March date for our appeal before
the Miami City Commission.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely, .�
Gerald F. Richma00
Michael E. Criden
S —395
to
MEC/dpj
u..
a
N
.
A3 (�
`�-xr.r•I��e�` `J x��i�teira,�/Q � ��i1��a,�� : mil.
October 26, 1987
City of Miami
Hearing Boards Division of the
Building and Zoning Department
Post Office Box 330708
Miami, Florida 33233-0708
RE: Class C-87-755 Special Permit Application
for Multiple Family Residential Structure
in RG-2.2/7 and SPI-4 Districts located
at 2475 Brickell Avenue
Gentlemen:
We hereby request a meeting for review of the decision
by the Planning Director to deny our -application for
permit. Please let us know when such a meeting will
take place.
Yours truly,
BRICRELL PROMENADE ASSOCIATES, LTD.
Morris Deckelbaum
MD:mm
Certified Mail
Return Receipt Requested
# P-632-599-854 .
No.
SS -395
=� 29M N. Military Trail, SWO 2010 a 11M Raton. Florida 33431 • Phone (305) 994-2133 9 Howard (306) 462.606 —,,/ I
W
It is intended that Class C Special Permits be reouireo wnere specirieo
uses and or occu cies involve substantial tech►' -&I issues relating to
planning policy.
Any project requiring a Class C Special Permit must first be reviewed by
the Building and Zoning Department (2nd Floor) to insure that each project
conforms to all zoning requirements. Therefore, this form must be signed
by the Chief Zoning Inspector before the project will be considered by the
Director of the Planning Depar nt.
"This project has been reviewed by the Building and Zoning Department and
has f un be i conAormanKe w_i�h all zing�redui eme ."
Ir�P. a
on ng actor t
The director of the Department of Planning shall be solely responsible for
consideration of applications for Class C Special Permits.
The director shall make such referrals to other officers or departments as
are required by regulations to the particular special permit and may make
other referrals deemed necessary by trim before arriving at his decison.
(Section 2301.3)
I, Moe Deckelba , hereby apply to the director
of aDepartment Of ann ng for approval of a Class C Special Permit under
the provisions of Articles 23 and 25 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. t
x Address of Property 9d9S ATE nlrel 1 Le.e++++a Mijbfn; _ FT. -
x Nature of Proposed Use (Be specific) Rental Apartment Atli ldi nQ
ZZ an-ioe
I attach the following in support or explanation of this application:
a) Survey of the property prepared by State of Florid4"Registered Land
Surveyor.
x b) Three copies of: site Clan showing (as required) property boundaries
and proposed structure(s), oarking, landscaoing, screening, etc=
buildtng elevations (if required), with dimensions and computation of
lot area (gross and net), building spacing height envelope, LUI
' ratios (Coen space, floor area, parking, etc.) See Section
2301.2.1(c).
c) Other (Specify)
98-395 9
w
**PERMIT FEES ARE NON-REFUNDABLE"
95:.1.11 $70.00
46-2.1,2.292.3,RO-2.1:
SPI-1 29394,50
6,7,9,10,11,12,14,
14.1,;4.Ll5,16.16.1,16.2,17: $0.02 per sq.ft. of net lot
area, minim $200.00
PD-H,HC,MU $0.01 per sq.ft. of net lot
area, miniwin $500.00
All other applications as
required by the text or
Schedule of District
Regulations $65.00 11
Signature
�rrner or Au ri zed 7lgent"�'
Name Brickell Promenade AssociatMdress 2900 N. Military Trail
City, State, Zip Boca Raton, FL 33431 Phone 994-2133
Date July 9, 1987
*FOR OFFICE USE*
Referrals - Yes X No Reorne Campbell, Public Works:
Joseph A. rienuardf. , Zonina Administrator: Sarah Eaton,anet
.avarrete. John n e ev, and fi'uillermo E. n1medillo. Olanninn
Conditions - Yes No
Findinas: See attached cane
Approved+, OisapprovV/
371 guez, rec or
Approved With Conditionsr1wagwoepartment
,odk -7
88-395
M
0
CLASS C-87-755
FINDINGS:
This Class C-87-755 Special Permit application to build a multiple family
* residential structure in RG-2.2/7 apaleP 2 of districts
6, and Section1e 540 derSPIh4
Schedule of District Regulations,
BM ckell Area Major Streets Overlay District of Zoning Ordinance 9500.
* Section 2305 of Zoning Ordinance 9500 states general considerations,
standards, findings and determinations required for special permits as
appropriate to the nature of the ineCadditioni to involved any other stanch Gs particular
circumstances of the case,
requirements set forth his concerning
anc�ase,ass or standards nando equirementseare
considered.of
- set forth for C12ssoC Special f 6, for Pall itdevelopment Schedule
thiszoning
Regulations, Page g
classification RG-2.2) which states that the intent
tin f theformof
district is to allow high intensity► redevelopment
multifamily dwellings with maximum density to be approximately 80 units per
net acre.
* In addition, as a result of the 1985 Growth Management Act, House 8i11 287,
opment
the local comprehensiveconform to
t plan. Underlocal landdevthe administrativeations review procedures
relating to land development, a general zoning code must, therefore,
conform to the local comprehensive plan. The Miami Comprehensive
Neighborhood Plan of September 1985 designates this area as High Density
Residential intended to be developed at a densit of 80 units er ^�t ecrmre�
The original proposal for this site, approve on pr st.+ roximately 68
#82-2723, proposed 112 units with a maximum density of app
units per net acre.
* Even though the present proposal does not exceed the maximum Floor Area
Ratio (F.A.R.) allowed for the district, the Land Use Intensity tables are
building m assured
designed to establish maTheuapplicatioenvelopes d
nproposes�272units not mwith ua maximum
densities/intensities.
161 units per net acre, which is excessive and
density of approximately
Neighborhood Plan of September 1985, the district or the Comprehensive
* intent of the district as far re traffic
The proposal does not follow the
is concerned: "High intensity development in this district, as related to
traffic traffic f low o handling Brickell
esnuearea^provided justified be intonne tionif uppwiethntnew
development".Y�nthe Zoning Ordinance,of units is more theumber of e of what is
parking a spaceslthat would be
allowed
suppno
leeentarydalso be t traffic handling ng additional
in the traffic;
appl cation.
supplementary
1
Page 1 of 2 89--395
10
„f Oart l n sOaclf Orev l d!d
1n the OroPosal d!!s not "allow tide
• fw! nrw�r 2106.21 evin though the t reauirediin chehOrd name.
ineent of Section comments by neighbors, it is apparent
Total Car Ratio of 1.1 parking spaces Per u^it ro ects. althou h
Through observations by stafff and comma for all
overflow /n the area from existing Therefore.
that there is parking nded a ratio
they have met mi^i""a” Zoning ODepartmentewouldmhave•recomfa
practical purposes the Planning were
of 1.5 parking spaces per ruacit-etallowedpinpthel0rdinance.Sectfall within the
maximm density of units pe
• ntially
The Proposal is in conflict vent thought the proposal oposalCistwithin therol of maximum
adverse effects generally. great majority of units
F.A.R. allowed in the Ordinance, because the g
proposed application are
exceedssmaller
density forwhat
is the predominant
of tin units the per area acre a i n the
Ordinance),
would potentially have a negative impact on
Ordinance), the proposal
adjoining and nearby properties, since it is not compatible and harmonious
with the character of existing development.
tember
+ After the intended�sed ethe
at conference that nial rendered
held none Septembert 30th 871987,
applicant e4 from Planning Department,
toetheattached
Class C 5 Rile dated October E3t ,mi987).�
* No new substantial evidence was introduced into the records.
Page 2 of 2 88-395
ll
,O Sergio Rodriguez, Director
Planning Department
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA
INTER -OFFICE MUMORANOUM
CAT[: October 29, 1987 „%.[
Joseph Genuardi LUIIJLCT Class C Special Permit
Zo Adminis r C-87-755
tROM• ria Fox, Division Chief RLF[RLNCLL:
Nearing Bards Division 9"CL.O:uR[:: Letter dated October 26, 1987
Building and Zoning Department f�■ Morris Deekglbaum
Attached is a copy of the appeal received of the above
mentioned Class C Special Permit. Please submit all
materials which constitute the record unpon which the
decision was taken. Also, lease include the names and
mailing addresses of all parpties who have expressed
interest or opposition in -this matter.
GDF:pas
F3 -395
i 01..
•
0
Zdith Fuentes, Director November 10, 1987
Building and Zoning Department
Attt Gloria Four, Chief "-E" _
Class C-87-755 File
A ring Boards Division
room ' EF[![tdCC 3
o Rodrigues. Director
P lag Departseat
Please find enclosed a copy of all materials which constitute the record upon
which the decision to disapprove Class-C-87-755 was taken. Please also find
enclosed a copy of all the oases and mailing addresses of all parties who have
been notified by the applicant as per our request. plus the names and sailing
addresses of all parties who have expressed interest or opposition in this
matter.
SR/VA if
88-395
13
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
.° Mr. Sergio Rodriguez, Director °A.T`' October 26, 1987
Plamning Dep.artlnent- ,
:USJECT Class C Special Permit
for 2475 Brickell Avenue
v
• • l' REFERENCES:
wooGeorge V. Campbel'f
Assistant Design Engineer ENCLOSURES:
Public Works Department
This department supports your denial of Class C Special Permit
for 2475 Brickell Avenue. We -also agree with your assessment of
the impact on the infrastructure.
For the record, when this department reviewed the preliminary
plan submitted, we were led to believe by the developer that this
was merely a resubmission of a previously approved project for
which time had expired. Our review was limited to number, size
and location of driveways, and the possibility of relocating an
existing opening in the median of S.E. 25 Road.
The purpose of this memorandum is to forestall any claims by the
developer that this department "has approved the project".
GVC: mw
bc: Highways
Sewers
Central
A9-395
[(I
Gloria Fox, Division Chief GATE December 24, 1987
Hearing Boards Division
Building and Zoning Department SUBJECT Lots 4 thru 9, Blk. G,
Brickell Hammock Unit
—�
FROM L1101 REFERENCE:No. 1 Extension
Orr Donald W. Cather, P.E. ENCLOSURES
Director of Public Works
This department has reviewed the proposed increase in density
above that allowed by the current zoning for the subject property
located at 2475 Brickell Avenue.
Sanitary sewers serving this property were constructed in 1962 at
which time the zoning was R-3 (lots 8, 9 ) and R-5 (lots 4 thru
7). The design criteria used for this project was as follows:
R-3 - 40 persons per acre
R-5 - 100 persons per acre
using R-5 for the entire property
(1.55 net acres) (100 p. p. a.) - 155 persons
155 persons
persons per unit = 78 units anticipated by design for
subject property
or 50 units per net acre design density
The current toning substantially exceeds our original design
criteria by allowing 80 units per net acre as follows:
(1.55 net acres)(80 units) - 124 units allowed by current
zoning.
There is a basic commitment to provide sanitary sewer service to
properties which are being developed within the existing zoning
(see letter 1/3/86 ). To further exceed the original des gn
parameters is not recommended.
JTW: mw
cc: Sergio Rodriguez, Director, Planning Department
A6-39S
IS
January 3rd, 1986
Mr. John V. Dalie
Buchanan Ingersoll Professional Corporation
Suite 400
5550 Glades Road AA
Boca Raton, FL 33431
Dear Mr. Dalie:
SANITARY SEWER AVAILABILITY FOR NORTHEAST CORNER OF
BRICKELL AVENUE AND S.E. 25TH ROAD, MIAMI, FLORIDA
Sanitary sewer service is available from Brickell Avenue and
the easement which borders the property described above. The '
Brickell Avenue sanitary sewer line has a service lateral 1
installed for the property. To make use of the sewer in the
easement a lateral may be installed at the owner's expense.
Both sewers have the capacity to accomodate flow for a
proposed development under the existing zoning.
For availability of other utility services to the subject
property, please contact the offices of each respective
utility company i.e. Florida Power and Light, Southern Bell,
etc.
If you have any questions please call James Kay at 579-6865.
Sincerely,
William E. Parkes, P.E.
Assistant Director
GJC . is
bc: Sewers
Central
CEPART.461.[\T LIF PL BLIC L: UP.KS : ; ♦ 1:. ;:z;, S+rerr . �;� :mi FIn• %� 33128 r 1305- i'=•ee:o
. a...
99"395
C�
Cr" OF MIAW, FL4010A f''Yti �•.: ��
j,L•l-
INTSO ORRIC! MEMONANOWd 1 uF " ; M; r : '. h • -
Sergio Rodrigues, Director OAT& August179 1997
Planning Department---
.usueT: Class C P rmit
- 87-755 r 247S Brick
•oem A. Gonuardi
os Wf`
n Administrator
Building 4 Zoning Department ss��sa
The Zoning Plans Reviewer has reviewed the plans submitted wit.
Class C permit application and found them to be in compliance
the Zoning Ordinance and :has signed the application.
I would like to remind you that my decision was that they wool
to provide the 70 feet adjacent to Brickell Avenue or apply fa
variance.
JAG! is
cc: Juan C. Gonzales
Theresita L. Fernandes
Central file
SS395
1%
r
` SEP-10 e7 15:17 ID:SIEGER PARTNERSHIP TEL NO:2742SV 4243 P07
—71
�\4°
tEfAll H. MAO
i..� -
3 March 26# 1926
'Charles X. Sieger A.I.A. '
9300 6.N. 67 Avenue
= Miami, F1 33176 _
Res Proposed Apartment Building
'The Terraces at Stickell,
•- 2475 oriekell Avenue
Miami, !1
Deu Mr. Sieger:
This `ie to, oonf Los our conversation in my office on March 23, 1996
in reference to the proposed apartment building.
The plans (Job No. 1404) dated December 12, 1994 and bevised-Janzarj
23, 191S, have been reviewed by the toning plan Ct:eckers for the
City of Miami and found to be in compliance with the City of Miami
Zoning Ordinance No. 9500, as amended.
Therefore, at such tia:e as you submit a complete set of plans
(structural, electrical, plumbing, mechanical, etc) and after It is
reviewed by all the technical sections and the Fire Prevention
Dc=aau and approved, the Zoning Division would'approve the issuance
ci a building pamit to construct the building as shown on the
rttsranced p1sAs.
If ycu roquirs any further inform&tion,•please feel free to contact
m• again.
ery tr ly you a,
a A. Genuardi .E.,
;... � • . � :' ` . • Aftsinia trator
JJ►G/le /
cc: Guilorr o Ormedw o, planning Department lqQ--395
Juan Gonsalea
Zoning file _
SEP-10-1V 15:17 ID:SIEGER PARTNERSHIP
n inp
C�j o, uGL�w°
TEL N0:2742S87 U243 P26
March 20, 1985 - - -
.Mr. Charles Sieger
9300 S.W. 87th Avenue - - -
Miami, Florida • 33176 -
.Dear Mr. Sieger:
• P)ease be advised that it will riot be necessary to receive
iliatoric Conservation Hoard approval of the Terraces project
located at 2495 8riokell Avenue. Your.previous plan submittal to
the Environmental Preservation Board in July of 1981 rare
reasonably reflected in 'your current landscape plans with the
following notations due to your building adjustoents:
- 12 trees -will have been .added for relocation
- 9 trees will remain rather than be rolocated
Lhe 20 misting trees (mostly palms) which
evidently succumbed to /disesse, will be
replaced with.22 trees, to maintain the same
number oY frees as tho original plan
said adjustments will be in accord with. the
Henderson/Rosenberg/Scully 1cn dated
1 /22/85. INI
NI
Facir igut z, Director
nning Department - r,
hl'�.S�� A. �FY - •`�- ~ :tom -t - • . ✓ ti .•,. t'4I- A. - -
METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORI" i f
1989 Jh;1 -
':FUREB
December 7, 1987
W. Sergio Rodriguez, Director
City of Miami Murd ag Departmait
275 N.W. 2nd Street
Mimmi, Florida 33128
Dear W. Rodriguez:
PIUAi
OFFICE OF COUNTY MAMA EFZPP4
COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT p
v = HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION `s
WARNER PLACE
111 S.W. 5th AVENUE. SUITE 101
MIAMI, FLORIDA 33130
�- (305) 5454=
n�
6"
.0'4'4D
I have spoken to Sarah Fatah in your PI arming Depar mmt an
archaeological site on the 2475 Brickell Avaase propezty0 and thl letter
documents our caav wsat:ion and oura�cy's an the potential
impact of development an any significant sites dorm (See Attached Memo of
September 18, 1987). The subject property is within an archaeological mwAgm-
ment area and any future cleating, tres removal, or crost =tiaa excavatim
should be subject to professional archaeological monitoring.
Sincerely,
tIZ4�-� 61x��
Robert S. Carr
Ardumlogist
cc: Micky Bias
RSC/it k
A8-395
20