Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-88-0390-W#4 7W J-88-370 4/26/88 RESOLUTION NO. 4-IS-3901 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE BISCAYNE VIEW APARTMENTS PROJECT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT (MU 88-001), FOR APPROXIMATELY 915 N.W. 1ST AVENUE (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN); MAKING FINDINGS, BY ATTACHING EXHIBIT "A" CONTAINING CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT WHICH ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF A 463 UNIT RENTAL APARTMENT PROJECT (INCLUDING 20,000 SOUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE) AND A 467 SPACE PARKING GARAGE, REFERENCING A SITE PLAN AND MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION, ON FILE AND INCORPORATED IN THE RESOLUTION, ALL PER ARTICLE 28 MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS DETAILED REQUIREMENTS OF ORDINANCE 9500, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI. WHEREAS, the City of Miami submitted an Application for a Major Use Special Permit per Article 28: Major Use Special Permits: Detailed Requirements of Zoning Ordinance 9500, for the Biscayne View Apartments Project to be developed by Cruz Development Corporation; and WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting held on April 20th, 1988, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 26-88 by a 7 to 1 vote, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of this Major Use Special Permit for the project; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has conducted a public hearing, having considered the Application for the Major Use Special Permit and the recommendations of the Miami Planning Advisory Board; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has determined that all leqal requirements have been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the best interests of the general welfare of the City of Miami to issue a Major Use Special Permit as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: ATT�'�'��o"—rT^wr9 i�:ri1;..... ..� CITY COMMISSION MEETING OF APR 28Q1988 SOLUTION No. 9a_Z MARKS laft. ?00� Section 1. The following Findings of Fact are hereby made with respect to the project: a. The Commission has determined that the project is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. b. The Commission has determined that the project is in accordance with the district zoning classification of Zoning Ordinance No. 9500, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Fla. c. The City Commission hereby finds that the project will not create adverse impact on air quality, ground water, soils, animal life, vegetation, wastewater management or solid waste disposal, and further finds that it will have a number of positive impacts including: 1. A projected generation of 80 permanent new jobs; and 2. The provision of 463 apartment units (which are in generally short supply within the City of Miami), 20,000 square feet of commercial space, approximately 467 parking spaces, and various recreational and services amenities. d. The City Commission hereby finds that the adverse impacts related to water demand, energy demand, solid waste generation, demands on public services and traffic generation will be mitigated by the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A", which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. e. The City Commission, further, hereby finds that: 1. The project will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; and 2. The project will efficiently use public transportation facilities; and 3. The project will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; and -2- qg-390 "1 ?014N 4. The project will efficiently use necessary public facilities; and 5. The project will have a favorable impact on the environment and natural resources of the City; and 6. The project will not adversely affect livinq conditions in the neighborhood; and 7. The project will not adversely affect public safety: and 8. There is a public need for the project. Section 2. The Biscayne View Apartments Project Major Use Special Permit (MU 88-001) ("Permit") for approximately 915 Mil 1st Avenue and attached Exhibit "A", containing conditions of the permit, authorizing development of a 463 unit rental apartment project (including 20,000 square feet of commercial space) and a 467 space parking garage (collectively referred to throughout this Resolution as "project"), referencing a site plan and Major Use Special Permit application on file and incorporated herein by reference, all per article 28 Major Use Special Permit detailed requirements of Ordinance No. 9500, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, is hereby approved, granted and issued. Section 3. The Major Use Special Permit, as approved, shall be binding upon the applicants and any successors in interest thereto. Section 4. The City Clerk shall send copies of the herein resolution to affected agencies, as specified by the Planning Department, and to the developer. -3- R1 9-390 /o� PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28t� h day of Aril , 1988. • r;e ATTEST: A Y H RAI, CITY CLERK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: E. MAXWEL ISTANT CITY ATTORNEY APPROVE 'AS TO FORM AND CORREC DIESS : YVVif1 A• VVV CITY AT RNEY JEM/JS/db/M678 uwnRrqft, -�- 99-390 EXHIBIT "A" MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Let it be known that the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida has considered in a public hearing on April 28, 1988, the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit; and has considered the detailed requirements of Ordinance No. 9500, the Zoninq Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, ("Ordinance No. 9500") in connection with the Biscayne View Apartments Project to be developed by Cruz Development Corporation and located in the City of Miami, at approximately 915 NW 1st Avenue, being legally described, as: Block 24, Plat Book "B" Page 4' of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, subject to any dedications, limitations, restrictions, reservations or easements of record; and after due consideration of the recommendations of the Planning Advisory Board issues: A Major Use Special Permit, subject to the following modifications: FINDING OF FACT WITH MODIFICATIONS Development 1. The development proposes 720,520 gross square feet of floor area, comprised of the following elements: Gross Square Feet Element of Building Area Units Residential 528,000 463 Garage 174,496 467 Commercial 18,024 This project meets the requirements of Ordinance 9500, and is further limited by applicable regulations and procedures as follows: The Schedule of District Regulations, Sheet 4 of 6, CR- 3/77 Commercial -Residential (General) District, Zoning Ordinance 9500, and the Miami Large Scale Development -5- FI8-390 r Committee meeting of March 30, 1988, whose members made recommendations based on the conceptual plan and design schematics on file dated February 17, 1988, prepared by Stull 6 Lee Inc. for the site hounded by NW 9TH Street on the south, North Miami on the east, NW 1st Avenue on the west and NW loth Street on the north. The site contains significant open soacP. The entire perimeter of the project will be landscaped substantially in accordance with plans to be submitted by Stull 6 Lee Inc., prior to issuance of a building permit. This permit contains the conditions for a Maior Use Special Permit per Article 28 of Zoning Ordinance 9500, and said conditions are applicable to the entire project. THE DEVELOPER, CRUZ DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SHALL: 1. Use only native and other non-invasive species adapted to South Florida climatic conditions in project landscaping. The landscape plan shall be prepared by a Florida registered landscape architect with final plans approved by the Planning Department. The owners shall be responsible for the perpetual maintenance of all landscaping. 2. Implement best management practices to minimize air pollution to include: a. Encourage utilization of the adjacent metrorail system; b. Promote the development of Phase II of the Metromover. 3. Incorporate the following energy conservation measures into the development: a. Encourage the incorporation of energy conservation measures into the design and operation of Net New Development by requiring that, at a minimum, all Net New Development shall be constructed in conformance with the specifications of the State of Florida Energy Efficiency Code for Building Construction (State Energy Code). 4. Collaborate with the City to incorporate security measures and systems into the design and operation of the project; -6- R9-390 r- security systems and construction documents to he reviewed by the Miami Police Department (at their option). Sufficient exterior lighting should he provided to deter criminal activities. Coordination between the Police Department and the private security force for the project must be developed prior to opening of the project. 5. Obtain all necessary permits from Dade County Water and Sewer Authority Department for the provision of water and wastewater services to serve the project. 6. Notify State and local historic preservation officials in the event any potential significant historic or archeological artifacts are uncovered, and delay construction for up to 3 months, if requested, for survey and excavation of the discovery. 7. Monitors the Minority Participation Plan approved for Cruz Development Inc. by the Miami City Commission. 8. Prepare a parking management plan prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, which shall be subject to approval by the Public Works and Planning Departments. 9. If required, allow the City to place radio antennas and related minor structures on the roof for the City's emergency communication system, in accordance with Department of Building and Vehicles Maintenance requirements. The applicant is to retain all rights of architectural approval. GENERAL 10. The Applicant shall submit a report, twelve (12) months from the date of issuance of this Major Use Special Permit and each twelve (12) months thereafter until a final Certificate of Occupancy is issued, to the Planning Director, City of Miami Planning Department. This report shall contain, for the preceding twelve (12) months: a. A general description of construction progress in terms of construction dollars and employment. - 7- R8"394 b. A cumulative list of all permits or approvals applied for, approved or denied. c. A statement as to whether any Droposed project construction changes in the ensuing twelve (12) months are expected to deviate from the approvals included in the Major Use Special Permit. The Planning Director, City of Miami Planning Department, or a project director to be named later, is hereby designated to receive this report, and to monitor and assure compliance with this Major Use Special Permit. 11. The Developer shall, at its expense, record this Biscayne View Apts. Major Use Special Permit with the Clerk, Dade County Circuit Court, within 30 days of issuance, specifying that the Major Use Special Permit runs with the land and is binding on the Developer, its successors, and/or assigns. The Developer shall give notice to Richard P. Brinker, Clerk, Dade County Circuit Court, 73 West Flaqler Street, Miami, Florida, 33130, for recording the Official Records of Dade County, Florida, as follows: a) That the City Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, has issued a Major Use Special Permit for the Biscayne View Apartments Project, located at 915 NW 1st Avenue. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Block 24, Plat Book 'B', Page 4, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida b) Cruz Development Corporation is the developer. c) That the Major Use Special Permit with any modifications may be examined in the City Clerk's Offices, 3500 Pan American Drive, Miami, Florida 33133. d) That the Major Use Special Permit constitutes a land development regulation applicable to the property; that the conditions contained in this Major Use Special Permit shall run with the land and bind all successors in interest; it being understood that recording of this notice shall not constitute a lien, cloud or encumbrance on real property, nor actual nor constructive notice of any of the same. L2. The developer shall comply with applicable provisions of the Southeast Overtown/Park Nest Community Redevelopment Master Development Order as approved by City of Miami, Resolution 88-110, on February 11, 1986, and any modifications thereto, and the increment i Development Order as approved by City of Miami Resolution 88-111 on February 11, 1988, and any modifications thereto. -9-FIS-w390 PZU10 PLANNING FACT SHEET APPLICANT Cesar H. Odio, City Manager City of Miami March 28, 1989 PETITION 1. APPROXIMATELY 91S NW 1ST AVENUE 81 ock 24 A.L. KNOWLTON (MIAMI NORTH) (9-41) P.R.D.C. Consideration of recommending a Major Use Special Permit, per ARTICLE 28 MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS: DETAILED REQUIREMENTS of Ordinance 9500, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, for the Biscayne View Apartments, a 463 unit rental apartment project including 20,000 square feet of commercial space and a 467 space parking garage, proposed by the Department of Development, of the City of Miami. REQUEST To recommended approval of a major use special permit for the Biscayne View rental apartment project in Southeast Overtown/Park West. BACKGROUND The City of Miami has been actively developing the Southeast Overtown Park West project is a community redevelopment/tax-increment financing district since 1982. The City has executed a pre -development agreement with the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs, prepared on Application for Development Approval and issued a Development Order for Southeast Overtown Park West as a Development of Regional Impact. The City has acquired 4 blocks in Southeast Overtown and cleared them; a land disposition agreement has been executed between the City and Cruz Development for the vacant block on which this project is proposed. 'r'9-39a PAB 4/20/89 Item 41 0 .4 ANALYSIS This project proposes a 463 unit rental apartment building. It contains a small retail component facing the mall, and a 467 space parking garage. This project is bound by all the conditions contained in the Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI, which are designed to mitigate the impact of the development. REGOMWMATMIK PLANNING DEPT. Approval. PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD The recommendations of the Planning Advisory Board, fbm i is meeting of April 20, 1988,• wi l l be presented verbally to the City Commission. F18-39a PAS 4/20/98 I tars 01 a s 4 'Im 3 Z N E I T EAR W Z hLE. I 1 ST. N.E. 10 ST. V.E. 8 ST . xWm� I"S SPECIAL USE N.W-m~8"_ST nA6 :0 APR 88 �� _ '- 390 AS 3 :cem 1 _knoroximacely 915 \14 lsc Ave. AQ-P-2 E r� u - ) 3 5 Q 0 U- t � Z M S its, A n.w i?- 51 Iml/7 GREYHOUND! CENTER I TRACT "A•' 17 s p, 16 of 1 S o ., A 4.40 : A I SIG 07 -----c S T E to �sl� W �aq `.. ' .. I ► o' Q. Ir- wl � IF II.+ 'IS IN 10 ST V — ,a ! S Iw �� � tit !i+:� ••��'• ''I S7 I N E jj A ,/ Z , !Fr ( I �G ICI •n S T R ST. 40 Ii.i CR-3/7 CONTINUES ON NEX T PAGE I �' ill L I � �� i� 5 I i. ►� Q I � .o sc I ti E 7 "' ST. pim I 1 4 PAB AAPR 88r AS -'3 a , C�t t, 40 a how 0 0 APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT File M nnber MU-84 It Is intended that major use special permits be required wsre specified uses and/or occupancies involve matters deemed to be of city-wide or erse-wide importance. The City Commission shoU be solely responsible for determinations an applications for major use special permits. (See Article 28J The City Commission shall refer all applications for major use special permits to the Manning Advisory Board and" to the director of the Depenment of Planning for recommendations, and may make ref errals to other age dm4 bodies, or officers, either through the Department of Planning or directly, for review, analysis, and/or technical findings and determinations and reports thereon. (Section 230I.S.) i, Cesar H. Odio, City Manager hereby apply to the Director of Plan- ning of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the Provisions of Article 28 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Address of Property Block 24, Southeast Overtown/Park West Redev. Pro: 915 North West 1st Avenue Nature of Proposed Use (Be specific) A development containing 463 residential units and 20,000 square 2 of commercial space. The development also contains a parking garz for approximately 467 vehicles and various recreational and servic amenities, with the commercial frontage on the 9th Street Mall Preliminary Application i attach the following in support or explanation of the PreliminaryApplication: 1. Two copies of a survey of the property prepared by a Stale of Florida Registered Land Surveyor. 2. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by a*Ication and disclosure of Interest form (Forms 4-83 and 4a-839 attach to appUcatiO116 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375 foot radius from the outside boundaries of property covered by this application (Forms i-#J, attach to applica- tt" Pogo 1 of 3 Form 16413 Revised ♦. Maps of: (a) existing zoning and (b) adopted comprehensive plan designations for the area q0 and around the property covered by this appilcation. S. General location map, showing relation fo the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, Important physical. features in and adjoining the project, and the like.. L Concept Plan ._ (a) Site Plan and relevant informaiion. Sections S10.2.3 (a through h) and 2304.2.1 (d through h). (b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed future uses, activities, systems and facilities. Section 2302.3.X" (c) How concept affects existing Zoning and adapted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variance:, special permits, change of zoning, or exemptions. Section 2802.3.Xb). 7. Developmental Impact Study fan application for Development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). - _ L Other (Be spec(flc) �. !. Fee of $ . based on the following: (a) $.01 per sq.ft. of building(s). Additional fees for any required special permits changes of zoning, or variances shall be in accord with zoning fees as listed in Section 62-61 of the City Code. (b) Fee tabulation Building(s) Other (Spoci 0 Pop 2 of 3 Total Form 1 "3 4m3.-:YQ(' Final Application I attach the following additional information in support or explanation of the final application: * Note: For Notification please Cesar H io contact Matthew Schwartz, Asst. City r Director, Dept. of Development 3 7 2- 4 5 9 0 Signature Authorized Agon Nome Cesar H. Odio, City Manage*wjdrus 3500 Pan American Drive Florida, 33133 * 579-6040 City, State, T.,p Miami, p�� This application is approved _ denied in accord with City Commission Resolution No. other " Pop 3 of ) -3. 0 Form 1 "3 r • CITY OF MIAMI. FLORIOA INTERrOFFICE MEMORANDUM '? Sergio Rodriguez o•*[ March 23, 1988 SEOPWnLE Assistant City Manager Attn: Joe McManus sUfi[cr Major Use Special Permit •ROM R[I[R[NG[f. 9�at 4wSchTazsistant or ENCLOSURES Department of Development Along with this memorandum are documents related to the submission for a Major Use Special Permit for Block 24, Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Project, Biscayne View Apartments. Plans related to this specific development project have been reviewed by the City of Miami Departments of Fire, Planning, Public Works and Development; utility Companies including Southern Bell, Peoples Gas, Florida Power_ and Light Corporation and Miami Dade Water and Sewer Authority. In response to this review process appropriate infrastructure provisions have been incorporated into the plans and specifications. Correspondence related to this process is a part of this submission. Unless otherwise indicated, the remaining documents have been extracted from the Application for Development Approval for the Southeast Overtown/ Park West Community Redevelopment Project Development of Regional Impact Study which has been approved and accepted by the South Florida Regional Planning council, subsequent to their multi -agency review and approval process. Following this action, on February 11, L988 the City commission authorized the issuance of a Master Development Order by Resolution No. 88-110. At that same meeting they also passed and adopted Resolution No. 88-111 authorizing Increscent I Development Order. Both of these documents and their respective Resolutions are attached. The Development Order issued by the City for Increment I allows the following land uses: 918-3.0 C Sergio Rodrigues March 23, 1986 page two Ib Land * Uses' .. Am ant Office (gross square feet) Retail/Service/General Comercial (gross square feet) Hotel (rooms) Residential (dwelling units) Convention (gross square feet) 166,000 66,200 0 ti 2,000 Attached to this cover memorandum is requirements which have been made known notations indicating their presence information. we shall continue working Guillermo Olmedillo of your staff to documentation. MS/JDS/wp <seopw>memo/musp/crus 290,000 a listing of all the to us and appropriate or other pertinent with Joe McManus and complete the required F15--39C L CITE Or MIAw. rl-(,r: r rwit 44- MEM01��w(�t_I�+t t.,,� Ii%J 3 F"-J ,p Ratty Hirai May 11, 1988 j City Clerk 4- ? Attn: Valerie Green,.;,: ° �,�``t' a Agenda Item PZ-10; City ComaiWon Meeting of April N, 1989 Joseph N. McManus, Assistant Director Planning Department ■1 Per the item referenced above, please send copies of the executed resolution, together with Exhibit A - Biscayne View Apartments Project Major Use Special Permit - to: JNM/dr drBR : 088 John E. Gilchrist, Director Department of Development Attn: Matthew Schwartz, Deputy Director (for transmittal to the developer) Guillermo E. Olmedillo Chief of Land Development Planning Department 8&- 390 0 0, CITY CF MIAMI. _ LORIOA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANOUM Sergio Rodriguez Assistant City Manager Attn: Joe McManus a thew Schwa z Assistant Uir for Department of Development PZU10 =ATE March 23, i988 SEOPW,cE =_e_E_- Major Use Special Permit MEFFOENCES = NCLZS'.:pES Along viith this memorandum are documents related to the submission for a Major Use Special Permit for Block 24, Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Project, Biscayne View Apartments. Plans related to this specific development project have been reviewed by the City of Miami Departments of Fire, Planning, Public Works and Deveiopment; Utility Companies including Southern Bell, Peoples Gas, Florida Power and Light Corporation and Miami Dade Water and Sewer Authority. in response to this review process appropriate infrastructure provisions have been incorporated into the plans and specifications. Correspondence related to this process is a part of this submission. Unless otherwise indicated, the remaining documents have been extracted from the Application for Development Approval for the Southeast Overtown/ Park Hest Community Redevelopment Project Development of Regional Impact Study which has been approved and accepted by the South Florida Regional Planning council, subsequent to their multi -agency review and approval process. Following this action, on February 11, i988 the City Commission authorized the issuance of a. Master Development Order by Resolution No. 88-110. At that same meeting they also passed and adopted Resolution No. 88-111 authorizing Increment I Development Order. Both of these documents and their respective Resolutions are attached. The Development Order issued by the City for Increment I allows the following land uses: PS-39U s Sergio Rodrigues March 23, 1988 page two LA Land Uses Amount Office 166,000 (gross square feet) Retail/ Service/ General Commercial (gross square feet) 66,200 Hotel (rooms) 0 Residential (dwelling units) 2,000 Convention (gross square feet) 290,000 Attached to this cover memorandum is a listing of all the requirements which have been made known to us and appropriate notations indicating their presence or other pertinent information. We shall continue working with Joe McManus and Guillermo Olmedillo of your staff to complete the required documentation. MS/JDS/wp <s eopw>memo/musp/ Cruz 99-390 0 Cl" OP MIAMI. PLORIC)A INtlR4FFICt MEMORANDUM •�_ Joe McManus o"*E March 2S, 1988 VILa Assistant Director Planning Department sueiac' Major Use Special Permit Parcel 24 �RoM / / � L Rart*t"Cas Masth6w D. Sc w is Assistant Diresebr aMCLOfuRas Department of Development Attached for inclusion in the Major Use Special Permit application are copies of Warranty Deeds for the seven parcels purchased by the City. MDS/bm Attachments 6AW ..- iLW 198-390 %�°''rsQ122 r11133�� 8c1366284 F WARRANTY DEED (,tit. 16It Wrb " THIS WARRANTY DEED, made this day of November, 1965, by and between MAX GENTLER and HELEN GENTLER, joint tenants with the right of surviorship (the "Grantors'), and THE CITY OF MIAMI, a aunicipal corporation of the State of Florida (the "Grantee"). WITNESSETH THAT: urantors, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and 4oi100 ($10.00) Dollars. and other good and valuable con- sideration, paid to Grantors by Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, have granted, bargained and sold, and hereby grant, bargain and sell, to Grantee, its successors and assigns, forever, real property, situated in Dade County, Florida, described as: Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 24, NORTH. CITY OF MIAMI, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B•, at Page 41, of the Public Records of Dade County, Ylorida. THIS TRANSACTION IS EXE14PT FROM THE PAYMENT OF STATE OF FLORIDA DOCUMENTARY STAMPS TAX PUR- SUANT TO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE RULE 128-4.14 (15)(b), AND IS LIKEWISE EXEMPT FROM THE DADE COUNTY SURTAX. The Grantors are brother and sister and reside at 125 Buckingham Road, Brooklyn, New York 11226. Subject to: Taxes for 1995 and subsequent years= zoning and ;et .c-4%AIaL..ry laws and ordinancesi and restrictions and ease- ments of record, in any, which are not intended to be reimposed hereby. And Grantors do hereby warrant the title to the above described real property and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all parties whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantors have caused this deed to be exe& cuted the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: STATE OF FLORIDA ) )SS. COUNTY OF DADE ) T e foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 11_1day of November, 1985, by MAX GENTLER and MEN GERTLER, ]oint tenants with the right of survivorship. R =•'��a 5ea 1) 4 tti.,�.R�A1�1TY 15 ) .,Go~ r e•cw arw JUCBA tRD P. 8R%.N RFJ. z .4 .4, �Q pW aaaNt uoull Notary ic, ate of F on a r loan, A Shy . 1010e"y1 At L My Commission Expires: trU1�N uWas Sty►[ 116Of y com 014 Mw..� t, IIJ� insm"N* ,, W.,,gip n*U QW&AL 11wswLama u� J ELGENE SHY, Jn. u/ tNc uw r r�, u C a � i 7-3yG 8 9. 2 3 1. A." m. :WIG up :s.,n,,, ►laaa 3u11 .. aran 6wanp • :5 S E 2 A.@ Swie 24Y • oLeft FL 1313, • 305) 37. 1082 D4AIR21 Moll * 85R26 1 836 ou 2618 vc 2043 WARRANTY DEED TNtS WARRANTY DEED, made this Z day of August, 1985, by and between S a S STOVE REPAIR, INC., a Florida corporation (the "'Grantor"), and THE CITY OF MIAMI, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida (the •Grantee•). WITNESSETH THAT: Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and No/100 ($10.00) Dollars, and other good and valuable con- sideration, paid to Grantor by Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, have granted, bargained and sold, and hereby grant, bargain and sell, to Grantee, its successors and assigns, forever, real property, situated in Dade County, Florida, described as: Lot 4, in Block 24, of NORT9, CITY OF MIANI, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book •B", at Page 41, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. THIS TRANSACTION IS EXEMPT FROM THE PAYMENT OF STATE OF FLORIDA DOCUMENTARY STAMPS TAX PUR- SUANT TO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE RULE 128-4.14 (15)(b), AND IS LIKEWISE EXEMPT FROM THE DADE COUNTY SURTAX. Subject tot Taxes for 1985 and subsequent years) zoning and other regulatory laws and ordinances; and restrictions and ease- ments of record, in any, which are not intended to be reimposed hereby. And Grantor does hereby warrant the title to the above described real property and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all parties whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has caused this deed to be exe- cuted the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: S i S STOVE REPAIR, INC., a Florida corporation Or BY: Press t c (Corporate; We' j i STATE OF FLORIDA ) )SS. COUNTY OF DADE ) �,Thhe foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of August, 1985, by DONALD C. SEERIDAN, President of S i S STOVE REPAIR, INC., on behalf of the corporation. •,.,. ••.•.. Notary Aub%ivc,ftte or F on a 73 Z c ul►otatial Seal) My Commission Expires: ^� < a. amf +� NOTARY PAUC : �J�'v+ •� / c{ - �; Th's in.vur••.nt e'as ,soared 31: MY CCMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT '6 I967 _(kAVNTY5 ) ZiGENE SITY..R somm TMW GENEiAL INwtAsia uNO, r tI • Of T..E •. �rE 6EATTY •S sr.• ss r ...0 :S o 2.. -o. r nss o.Wn i44111-ft 61,s�I,,u',e i4l srss .aawr, ����C F�o,.a. ,»:► vcanw P. stings ,7 CtEaa 61a"01 OOWE atilt► A Sty • Attorneys At Law • mqr~ 9,, * 4 1 • 25 S E 2 Ave . SWO 247 1 MM" FL 33131 . 13051 37' 4082 10 a3V-3 48.-%!S5 35R268187 EC 12623 7c I SGB MARRANTY DEED THIS NARRANTY DEED, made thisLO rdap of August, 1985, by and between JAMES BYRD ANDERSON, JR., a single man, and JOBN VELLA, a married man (the 'Grantors"), and TSE CITY OF MIAMI, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida (the 'Grantee*). NITNESSETH THAT: Grantors, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and No/100 ($10.00) Dollars, and other good and valuable con- sideration, paid to Grantors by Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, have granted, bargained and sold, and hereby grant, bargain and sell, to Grantee, its successors and assigns, forever, real property, situated in Dade County, Florida, described ass Lots S, 6, 7, and the East half of Lot 18, and all of Lots 19 and 20, Block 24, NORTH, CITY OF MIAMI, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book •B•, at Page 41, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. THIS TRANSACTION IS EXE14PT PROM THE PAYMENT OF STATE OF FLORIDA DOCUMENTARY STAMPS TAX PUR- SUANT TO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE RULE 129-4.14 (1S)(b), AND IS LIKEWISE EXEMPT PROM THE DADE COUNTY SURTAX. The above described property is commercial property and does not constitute nor has it ever constituted the homestead of either Grantor, whose residences are located at 943 North Venetian Drive, Miami, Florida 33139 and 10296 N.W. 9th Street -Court, Miami, Florida 33172. Subject to: Taxes for 1985 and subsequent years; zoning and other regulatory laws and ordinances; and restrictions and ease- ments of record. in any, which are not intended to be reimposed hereby. And Grantors do hereby warrant the title to the above described real property and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all parties whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantors have caused this deed to be exe- cuted the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: ;,44 A Page 1 o Acknowledgment is on Page 2 99- 390 F OFF I z�� n 15G9 "A" Or nARiDA ) )ISI court Or DAa2 The fore4ein! tnstrVMfIt NAs ACINAWied�ed before as tALs day of Aelsst. 1!D!• by JUM "M 110lIlfON• JIt. • a sLn4ie bias. and JOIN VRLLA• a saarried ban. ;�►+ .:""fir*. . notary e. • e or Pier ~` ai seal Mr CosmLssLon Upires: It l4RCt `-. ra" •r •.w mow•. wON1r • y.w .ww AICEAM P. BR/IVUS C" GI Page 2 of 2 ' 99-390 MM a ft • ftyrap w ur • 21i s.: • • . bur a*? • Mon. it 33131 • i 3O$1 3I t -4M A toIP-3 #A0iS �SR269188 WARRANTY DEED RED i 26231G 510 THIS WARRANTY DEED, made this 34*day of August, 198S, by and between JAMES BYRD ANDERSON, JR., a single man, and JOWN VELLA, a married man, co-partners doing business as ANDERVELLB (a Partnership) (the *Grantors*), and TIM CITY OF MIAMI. a municipal corporation of the State of Florida (the "Grantee'). WITNESSETH THAT: Grantors, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and No/100 ($10.00) Dollars, and other good and valuable con- ..sideration, paid to Grantors by Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, have granted, bargained and sold, and hereby grant, bargain and sell, to Grantee, its successors and assigns, forever, real property, situated in Dade County, Florida, described as: Lots 8, 17 and the West half of Lot Is, Block 24, WORTS, CITY OF MIAMI, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book age, at Page 41, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. THIS TRANSACTION IS EXEMPT FROM THE PAYMENT OF STATE OF FLORIDA DOCUMENTARY STAMPS TAX PUR- SUANT TO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE RULE 12B-4.14 (15)(b), AND IS LIKEWISE EXEMPT FROM THE DADE COUNTY SURTAX. The above described property is commercial property and does not constitute nor has it ever constituted the homestead of either Grantor, whose residences are located at 943 North Venetian Drive, Miami, Florida 33139 and 10296 N.W. 9th Street -Court, Miami, Florida 33172. Subject to: Taxes for 1985 and subsequent years zoning and other regulatory laws and ordinancesi and restrictions and ease- ments of record, in any, which are not intended to be reimposed hereby. And Grantors do hereby warrant the title to the above described real property and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all parties whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantors have caused this deed to be exe- cuted the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: v oYiY1, iness as tnership) Page 1 of 2 Acknowledgment is on Page 2 partners doing ANDERVELLE (a �S-39C SO MY A N1 • AftNWA AI Law - InW~ &," - 2539 2 Awe, SuM 2d7 *Mon FL 33131 - 13051 3)1 40a2 i 0 Ob STATE Op FLOA t oA )t 26230lC' S �' )Ste COum 0! oAOE ) �he foregoing instrmmnt was acknowledged before os this mlA day of August, 191S► by JAMBI MO ANDIRO t JA.. a single nAman► and JOfM VILLA, a married man, co-partners doing business as AIgMIVILL= c a lartnersAip t . P9 ;:..notary Pfblie, Yn* of plorlae .40 ' ; . t terial teal) d" A .` f' +Ai/. SL111l1tA11'l'Yt ) My Casisiission 3xpirss: Paqe 2 of 2 BOOT Hay OPO4 M&4mQ UM, low gums aa�aC" '99-39C SOMA 4 NOW 0 AMWMW At 1w 0 04WWR awq 0 26 8 9 2 AN !Up 24? 0 M am it 32171 • 17061 »1 AMI e1ilQ-3 MDso* 85R268190 WARRANTY DEED )"EEC 126C� ►G 1513 THIS WARRANTY DEED, made this,�lay of August, 1985, by and between POSH, INC., a Florida corporation (the 'Grantor'), and THE CITY OF MIAMI, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida (the 'Grantee'). WITNESSETH THAT: Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and 40/100 ($10.00) Dollars, and other good and valuable con- sideration, paid to Grantor by Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, have granted, bargained and sold, and hereby grant, bargain and sell, to Grantee, its successors and assigns, forever, real property, situated in Dade County, Florida, described as: Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12, Block 28, NORTH, CITY OF MIAMI, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 'D', at Page 41, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. THIS TRANSACTION IS EXEMPT FROM THE PAYMENT OF STATE OF FLORIDA DOCUMENTARY STAMPS TAX PUR- SUANT TO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE RULE 128-4.14 (1S)(b), AND IS LIKEWISE EXEMPT FROM THE DADE COUNTY SURTAX. Subject to: Taxes for 1985 and subsequent years: zoning and other regulatory laws and ordinances; and restrictions and ease- ments of record, in any, which are not intended to be reimposed hereby. And Grantor does hereby warrant the title to the above described real property and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all parties whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has caused this deed to be exe- cuted the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the pre nce of: i Cam_ STATE OF FLORIDA ) )SS: COUNTY OF DADE > POSH, INC., a Florida corpora- tion SY • ICJ B. ANDERSON, JR., President (Corporate Seal) JThe foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 3 day of August, 1985, by JAMES B. ANDERSON, JR., President or POSH, INC., a Florida corporation, on behalf of the corporation. C:' o Notary u i tate of f on a A N: r%f#1 �ari!jj Seal) My Commission Expires: NOTARY 1U" STATE OF FLOMDA sue- •-w-N, I. wow wa,w .� Mr cOMMKS� WIMS SLIT 16 ng wiRRJ►t)TY 6 ) ,r YY M.I. .,w1Y. Zsm .4"" �Q'� TIeU @lLAL M'fiURA11Q UrQ1 WC8A1WP. 8R).NUi ` ° `3-39C QUM wowt "Im - §"Wv • Shv . Arwfto At Low - wW~ au+wV • 25 S E 2 A.* SW 241 - %M m FL 33131 - 12051 211 4002 i / Anil A �-12 e5R15 S06 WARRANTY DEED 4Ei 126C , Ff. 248 TAIS WARRANTY DEED, made day of August, 1905, by and between PARR A PARTNERS, LTD., a Florida limited partnership (the •Grantor•), and THE CITY OF MIAMI, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida (the 'Grantee*). NITNESSETH THAT: Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and No/100 (S10.00) Dollars, and other good and valuable con- sideration, paid to Grantor by Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, have granted, bargained and sold, and hereby grant, bargain and sell, to Grantee, its successors and assigns, forever, real property situated in Dade County, Florida, described as: Lots 13, 14, 15 and 16, in Block 24, of NORTH, CITY OF MIAMI, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book *be, at Page 41, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. THIS TRANSACTION IS EXEMPT FROM THE PAYMENT OF STATE OF FLORIDA DOCUMENTARY STAMPS TAX PUR- SUANT TO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE RULE 12E-4.14 (15)(b), AND IS LIKEWISE EXEMPT PROM THE DADE COUNTY SURTAX. Subject to: Taxes for 1985 and subsequent yearat zoning and other regulatory laws and ordinancest and restrictions and ease- ments of record, in any, which are not intended to be reimposed hereby. And Grantor does hereby warrant the title to the above described real property and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all parties whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has caused this deed to be exe- cuted the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed a d dellivered in he prese ce It: I STATE OF FLORIDA ) )SS. COUNTY OF DADE ) PARK A PARTNERS, LTD., a Florida limited partnership BY: BY: PARK A REAL ESTATE CORP. OF MIAMI, a Florida Corporation, its general 1 Partner The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before' me this 1144k day of August, 1965, by GERARD M. ALTSCHUL, Vice President 07 PARK A REAL ESTATE CORP. OF MIAMI, as general partner of PARK A PARTNERS, LTD., a Florida limited partnership, on behalf of the partnership. .IOs„e M W0101H tlrr SM j � MW=OYr••. gMrf� fy,. ,IOM, rf,�nU ■:CHARD P. BRJIVUA uuu CUQU coast Notary u i State of F on a :a n � R *W ia' Seal) My Commission Expires: rnr, .LJetuw EUGENE SMinure . SHY, +w ev' NOyAIIY PUBLIC ��'• JR. R. (I�ARAANTY2 ) Or Tr E LAW , a.a IAV COMMISSrON EIPUS 'EFT 0 Het �r'r EEanr i Sr., R Epp THRU GENERAL INSURA1/M I .: 5 E :,.. -34 5u44 itl %Lama, No,w� J7 UJ • WOW • • At ciA7 ASEP23 PW 1-31 85R292537 *EC 12645 PG Z260 WARRANTY DEED THIS NARRANTY DEED, made this j�%31day of September, 198S, by and between ANTONIO G. HECRAVARAIA, a married man, and REYNALDO 92CRAVAARIA, a married man (the *Grantors*), and THE CITY OF MIAMI, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida (the *Grantee*). WITNESSETH THAT: Grantors, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and No/100 (i10.00) Dollars, and other good and valuable con- sideration, paid to Grantors by Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold, and hereby grant, bargain and sell, to Grantee, its successors and assigns, forever, real property, situated in Dade County, Florida, described as: Lots 21, 22, 23 and 24, Block 24, NORTH, CITY OF MIAMI, according to. the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book •B•, at Page 41, of the - I• Public Records of Dade County, Florida. THIS TRANSACTION IS EXEMPT FROM THE PAYMENT OF STATE OF FLORIDA DOCUMENTARY STAMPS TAX PUR- SUANT TO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE RULE 129-4.14 (15) (b) , AND IS LIKEWISE EXEMPT FROM THE DADE COUNTY SURTAX. - The above described property is commercial property and does not constitute nor has it ~' ever t-nn%r4tttt.A hh. d- cf either Grantor. ANTONIO G. HECHAVARRIA's residence is located at 2720 North Atlantic Blvd., Pt. Lauderdale, Florida 33308, and REYNALDO BECHAVARRIA's residence is located at 2451 Brickell Avenue, Apartment SP, Miami, Florida 33129. Subject to: Taxes for 1985 and subsequent years: toning and other regulatory laws and ordinances: and restrictions and ease- ments of record, in any, which are not intended to be reimposed hereby. And Grantors do hereby warrant the title to the above described real property and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all parties whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantors have caused this deed to be exe- cuted the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: ANTONIO 1G. HECBAVARRIA 900 M REYNALDO HECHAVARRIA q03-39(` T:w Instru"W t, W" 1 •�. EUGENE Sara, O/ iNE LA' , " , SEAM L ii S.E. 2 A.S. PAGE l snas 2u Wn'w IIArw� »ut Mra�ry • ShT - AnOFM"l At LA. - nQ,�ttltn 9utOnq . 25 5 E 2 A.. 5-80 SA 7 - Myw FL J3 t J t . — OSt 37+ a0A2 ( � / qk STATE 0! FLORIDA ) )S$e COUNTY OF DADE ) AEC 12645 07N T O foregoinq tnstrueent was acknowledged before eye this f* day of September, 196%, by ANTON20 C. BCfAVMRIA, a matried man. r C 1 �.E • iNearial Seal ) 1i.;iTAT. C! FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF DADE ) �f e foregoing instrument 4 day of September, 19AS, man. c ?jotarisl Seal) f AAIRAANTY 13 ) to e, to Of FlarLia My Commission Expires: NOTARV ►UlUC STATE O: FLORIDA . M V COMMISSION upon Wt Is Im was acknowledged before me this by REYNALDO RECMVAAIEIA, a married I &I,, Vtt �f — Notary(VublLc, CNate of Florid; My Commission Expires: NOTARY rUILIC STATE Of FLORIDA E MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SENT Ii go BONDED T►e4 COMA Pojm Q %04 ..r+ r ��� y rrr+• w � V�iARD� � hAW E ScA.,. PAGE 2 4 94L p s� Sft as`. �.- soul 1.98-390 *""V A W • Afla"W { Al LSW . wVaNatm &0",* . 25 S E 2 Ave S-40 gal 0 MWIY it 3313+ • 306I 37' .082 n 0 CO11�s�pMp�NCs 11SLA'1'�0 TO PpAvtws � 98-390 2802.2.3.a. 0 A CITY OF MIAMI. FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMOPIAP40UM Sergio Rodriguez Director Planning Uept. r►ttn: Joe McManus rq _M Donald Cather Director Public Works Department DATE March 1i, 1966 9111LE Susitc- Major Use Special Permit Biscayne View Apartments REFERENCES ENCLOSURES ,his memorandum is hereby submitted as a part of the Major Use Special Permit for Block 24, Southeast Overtown,Park Test Community Redevelopment Project, Biscayne View Apartments, Located between NW 9 and 10 Streets, and NW 1 and North Miami Avenues. Related to the major intersections which fail within. approximately 1/4 mile: of Block 24, the Biscayne View Apartments site, the following are our fiiiuiiiya LC1de.tU LU ldiLIL Dquact: a) The street network adjacent to the subject block has been planned and iias, or is in the process of being upgraded by the City of Miami to meet the needs of the entire Southeast overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Area including the Biscayne View Apartments Project. b) Related to the improvements to the streets and avenues, all traffic control mechanisms have and/or will be installed to r,eet the needs of the entire Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Area including the Biscayne View Apartments Project. DC/ Ma/ br qs-390 f June 11, 1995 Sermello, Kurki a Vera, Ina. SS Almeria Avenue Coral Gables, FL 33134 Attu: ter. Willy A. Hermello President Dear Willy: U RECE)ITONIUM 13- In regards to your letter dated May 13th, 1986 requesting infim=tion as to FPL's capability to service the load growth in t!W Downtown area (L-t oowntown we are referring to Qsni, Ovesta+, Central Downtown, Little Havana and Brickall), I am pleased to provide you with the following: T*;• may c1_-c..r: Mb►A &J demand for this area in 1985 was 290. The average load growth is projected to be 5.01 per year over the next 15 years. The peak demand by year 2000 is expected to increase to 540MVA. however, the potential demand that FPL can serve by year 2000 is more than twice the projected figure. This can be by considering the following factors: 1. FFL presently serves this area from six substations with 66 feeders. When carrying full capacity, these feeders can serve a demand of 500MVA. 2. The ultimate capability of the existing substations with all future feeders plus those now in service is 952MVA. (See attachment 92) 3. with two additional substation sites developed and all feeders installed, FPL will have the capability to serves a demand of 1150WA. ( see attachment i 3) In summary, the present peak demand in the Downtown Miani area is 2901e1VA, and we will have facilities in place, if needed, to serve a demand of 1150MVA. This represents a load increase of approximately four tines today's level, and I am confident we can serve any load alternative presented to us. qS-390 12G-7 "I CPLE !*.I-11v1Nt- 1 In regards to energy msnag mant/conservation plan, I can tall you that ►he mir)wtaq and Energy Conssrvation Dept. of FPQ is responsible for ivioinv our custaeers to imi~t the many energy conservation pragraar. This includes assisting designers and developers for energy efficient buildings. In regards to the potential use of on -site cogereration, we can assist a developer in the planning stage in the areas of applicable rates, feasibility of the project, construction details, intereonnsesion, etc. I believe this information satisfies your request, however, should you require additional details, please do not hesitate to give me a call on 529-5061. Sincerely yours, Guy J. Sanchez Miami Downtown Manager 12C-8 98-39Q Cl" OF MIAMI. RLOAIOA INT POFRIG[ MCMORANOVM Appendix 123-3 o :�a t,-ew Schwartz Deputy .'irectcr De;artment cf revel:pment ?. Cu►C:, thief rooms act::.g :rector Department cf Fire, Rescue and :nspection -Services Dart, :ecember '6, ?n-5 tuutcT impact of Sout^east 4vertown/ParK West Development Rptne"Cts: .,Lt. :n response to your request for information regarding the serv.ce capabilities of the Department of Fire, Rescue and :nspection services to the Southeast Overtown/Parkwest Development area and the _=pact on services of protected development through the year sutm:t the following: ':he Southeast Cvertown/Parkwest Development area is served by Fire Station 01, located at 144 N.E. 5th Street with an on -duty manning force of 18 firefighters. :his area is also served by Fire Station 02, located at 1901 North Miami Avenue with an on -duty manning force of 15 firefighters. Response time to the area is less than four (4) minutes. ?rojected growth in the Southeast Overtown/Parkwest area in population, housing units and commercial square footage may have a significant impact on emergency medical services and on -going fire safety inspections. Future development may also be subjected to an impending City of Miami impact Fee ordinance. :f you require additional information, please contact Deputy Chief Floyd Jordan at the Fire Chief's office. bw ng,-3SO METAOPOLI 7 AN OAO '.:OUNTY, =L CPICA $ftendix 11'A-9 AMV10A *0or►o� III ►1� ti+E'p0 0aCE Cw'E� weuc WORKS eo.Art"t son 1eio ��� Nw ��ltREEt MIA4/1, slOR�olt 3�!•lllO 375-3997 August 28, 1986 Mr. Ted Platon, Project Engineer Williams, Pussell and Johnson, Inc. 100 North Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 2100 Miami, Florida 33132 Dear Mr. Platon: :his is in response to your question regarding hazardous waste. Dada County's Solid Waste Disposal Division does not generate or accept toxic waste, however, small amounts of toxic waste may be inadvertently aimed with the waste stream upon accession. To miniaize any problems that could result from unauthorised deliveries, we have instituted a Waste Enforcement Officer (WEO) Program. We employ seven full time WEO's who are trained to spot and properly segregate such material. This program has resulted in the practical elimination of such incidents. Should an incident arise, however, the removal of the material would be handled by a licensed private contractor who is undss contract with Macro -Dade County co provide 24-hour, on -call, tasting, segregation, transportation and disposal services for toxic and/or hazardous wastes. I hope this information is helpful to you. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any further inquiries. JAp/.JW/db Sinearely, (gyp oaeph A. s, Jr. Aaalstant Director for So11d Waste Disposal 12A-9 feue/ OPOWWROYWetwisso smoorwAWWOO 'I9-390 z r.;ar. .. .: -! 7ed ?!atr'L't. ::c.'-c:= a:.a :'J'C ::or h 3iscavre _'c.:,ie%:.:; :, :,�:a Z:.'O :?a= AL- . ?!at= : .-.a6c Jcu far 7mx in-zerast In Dace Coo-ntJ's sold :Tanta di:roaa- sy s-m. Counri-wide c� systa: is capable of 1.1wdlirg over ?6,:�0 tors of *taste per meek. .. ,s is acccqplished with. a coordinated system of transfer stations and disposal: sites. There are no exast:ng or antic rated fiture disposal sites wi:hi:. rile downtown area. This area served by the Cm al Transfer Station. 7,ar re growth in this area can be handled by: 1) expansion of the earstirg ^-ansfer station; 2) building a new --ansfer stat--= a -- another locaticr.; 3) re-dez:^.:rg the present service area. Al.cernatives 1 and 2 would requ:..:e land ccam =ants by the Ci~- of which rave not been cb tainab le in the past. :n any event , as the area ' s growth rate necessitates it, disposal service will be available via t:anafer stations) of adequate capacir/ to serve &A area. Regarding -.he disposal of hazardous waste, the County's Solid waste Disposal Division does not generate or accept toxic waste. Scall amaaus may, however, be inadvertently mixed with the waste stream won occassion. To mini Ue any problems that could result from unauthorized deliveries. we have instituted a Waste Enforcement Officer (WEM Program. We employ seven full time WEO's who are trained to spot and properly segregate such material. This program has resulted in the practical elimination of such incidents. Should an incident arise however, the removal of the material would be handled by a licensed private contractor who is under contract with Metro -Dade Cowry to provide 24-hart, on -call, testing, segregation, transportation and disposal services for toxic and/or hazardous wastes. App*radix 12A-3 Evwsr OpoaruRItYINAnaiceo EmosorsaSaysces 9 g-390 saw:• `, a. :�t. Ted :.i-.= hope peat tm :aid =a :riamatim helpful, please do not c tzen Siresralq, C� Joseph A. RLS Z • Jr. . AasistMC DiMtOr. PWD :rt Solid Waste Disposal ..aw.1Ml dw 12A-3 919--390 =NMI= llo. 95-393, April 11, 1913 NOLnTICN No. 18-1311, February 11, 1911 WWWTiON No. 1e-110, February 11, 1921 p MOZAITi0N No. if-111, February 11, 1911 '98-3.% 07 .7•es-zee , 4/12/05 RESOLUTION NO. 85� .�93• A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THL RSCOMMIMOATION Of TRt CITY MANAGER POR THE •RLSMON Of DEVELOPERS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT Of THE ' SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARR NEST REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT PRASE I GENERALLY SOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY NORTHWEST LOTH STREETt NEST BY NORTHWEST 2ND AVENUE AND NORTHWEST IRD AV9MUE1 SOUTH BY NORTHWEST iTN STREET AND NORTHWEST 7TH STREETS AND EAST SY NORTH MIAMI AVENUE AND NORTHEAST 1ST AVHNUtt AUTHORISING ' AND *DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER AND CITY ATTORNEY TO NEGOTIATE CONTRACTS WITH THE PROPOSERS1 AND rURTHtR DIRECTING TSt CITY MANAGER TO PRESENT THt NEGOTIATED CONTRACTS TO THE CITY COMMISSION AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE rOR CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY COMMISSION PRIOR TO THE EtECUTION THEREOF. WHEREAS, the City Commission by Resolution No. E2-7SS, approved in principle, the Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Plant and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 84-e93 the City Commission authorized the City Manager to issue a Request for Unified Development Project Proposals for the Southeast Over:own/Park West Redevelopment Project Phase It and WHEREAS, the City Commission selected Touch* Ross s Co. as the certified public accounting firm and appoint*d members of a review committees and WHEREAS, the request for proposals for the unified develop- ment project contained specific evaluation criteria to be used by the certified public accounting firm and the review committees and WHEREAS, 20 proposals were received by the City in response to the request for proposals on December 14, 19e4 the published date for receipt of proposalst and WHEREAS, the certified public accounting firm developed a model to evaluate the viability of the development teams and their ability to maintain prices at proposed levels, the viability of the proposed financing strategies, the viability of the proposed projects, and the short and long-range CITY COM;•l;S:i:GN fiscal return to the City and rendered its written r or�ll?9�;plsz; APR I1 1985 `•I 19IR-39C City tanager; and WW MAS, the review committee received the presentations of the proposers and, after attentive analysis and discussion of the proposals, rendered a written report to the City Manager eon- - tsining an sysluation of each proposal based on the specific evslustion criteria included in the request for proposelet and wNtRtAS, the review committee adjudged the following development teems to be superior with respect to their proposal• for the development of their designated parcels of land in the project areas Recommended Develoyoc PatPat=_ Cruz Development Company 24 Crux Development Company 25 Crux Development Company Ii Can -American Realty Corporation or Crus Development Company 27 Decoma Venture (sports Arenar at Circa/ssenese/Sawyer Mousing) 44 Circa/Sarness/Sawyer 4S Indian liver Investments Circa/Serness/sawyer SS Circa/Sarnese/sawyer $it and WNtRSAS, the following development teens were ranked first according to the certified public accounting firms Recommended Developer Parc�o. Cruz Development Company 24 Cruz Development Company 25 Crux Development Company 36 Can -American Realty Corporation and Crus Development Company 37 Circa/Sarness/Sawyer 44 Circa/Sarness/Sawyer 45 Indian River Investments II, Ltd. 46 Circa/Sarness/Sawyer SS Circa/lacness/sawyer Sit and -2- 85-*193 9S-3-90 t ok WHEREAS, the City Manager, taking into consideration the findings of the certified public accounting firs and the *valua- tions of the review committee, recommends the scceptante of the proposals free the following development teams for the Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Project Phase to Recommended Developer Parcel No, Cruz Development Company 24 Cruz Development Company as Crus Development Company 36 Can -American Realty Corporatiom 37 Circa/Sarness/Sawyer 4S Indian River Investments II, Ltd. 46 Circa/Sarness/Sawyer SS Circa/Sarness/sawyer S61 NOW, THEREFORE, SE IT RESOLVED BY TOR COMhISSION OF TOR CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recommendation of the Citv Mananor 4e accepted and the following development teams are selected to develop the designated parcels of land in the Southeast Over- town/Park West project area generally bounded on the north by Northwest loth Streets west by Northwest and Avenue and Northwest 3rd Avenues south by Northwest ith Street and Northwest 7th Streets and east by North Miami Avenue and Northeast let Avenue: Recommended Developer Parcel No. Cruz Development Company 24 Cruz Development Company 2S Cruz Development Company 36 Circa/Sarness/Sawyer 45 Indian River Investments II, Ltd. Ii Circa/Sarness/Sawyer SS Circa/Sarness/sawyer Sf -3- 95-3s3 99-39. 0 t Section 2. The City Reneger and the City Attorney are hereby autherited and directed is negotiate a contract with the ofereNntiened derelepoent tome. Section 2. The City Manager is further directed to present the negotiated contracts to the City CoSoisaien as soon as practicable for consideration and approval by the City Cosoission prior to osaeation thereof. 1 PASS90 AND AMPT90 this Alin.. day of Asril- - - loss. Te MAYRtCt A. MU �r • ayor ity Clark rRtt 0 AND ArrROVtD ST: TEENER Assistant City Attorney APP,WVtO`AJ 70 ,roRN AN _co_ RR� tsR e City Attorney RNS/wpc/ab/pb/194 -4- 85-3$3.. 4-IS-390 �-se-leo srlerN ON twoevr2oeT No. ��6 A speoLQTIOs QTwom Tn DSAnun Km INITIATION OF CONETSOM2011 TO JUNS 19, lose; ' 20TABLISSINO A OONSTNUCTION psSlOD OF sea MORS TSAs lTQTY-ron ( es) moms: smina A PSOT28202 TO LET Tss DIVSWPIM SNOT JUSTIp2ASLs CAUSI AS TO ITS 221"ILITY TO OOWLETE TIE PVOJ9CT ON TINS AND SWIRL= A f aALTY OF $1. 000 SACS DAY TSS tOWICIP 18 LATs FOR PANCsi. NO. ee OF TOM SOOTssAST OTSRTOTE / PASS TSET . PRASE I 1► a v mwww S & f PNOJSCT; SAID TINS AWI82TSs TO Ss MADE TAINT OF TES LAND DISPOSITION AGNBSKINT sRMU TES CITY OF NIANI AND C U S DSTSLOPKZMT AND ASSOCIATES. LTD. FOR CONSTRUCTION Of ese 921"; FURTuslt 030ASING TRAT I! SAID OONSTRUCTIOs , DSA=JMS FOR PASCSL so. fa Is NOT an' CRUS DNTsiOPMUT AND ASSOCIATES. LTD. LOINS ITS DSTszOPsuNT SIGITs IN PARCELS 24. es AND 3e OF SAID PNOdSCT. TRIMS. the City Commission by Resolution, No. sE-TES approved. is principle, the Southeast Overtsoaipark test Redevelopment plan; and TRIMS, the City Commission by Resolution No. e4-303 authorised the City haaater to issue a Request for Unified Development Project proposals for phase I of the southeast OvertovarPart test Redevelopment Project; and TRIMS, proposals were received and evaluated by a certified public a000uatins firs bad by a selection revive committee appointed by the City Commission; and TRIMS. the City Manager considered the find'- s of the certified public 6000unti29 firm and the evaluatioae of the selection, review ocmmsttee and recommended development entities and proposals for acceptaaoe for the phase I development parcels; and CITY COKMISSIOIi NEETINC OF FEe is 19:! 9g-3.90 91 WlIMI , the "tT Commission by tesoluties to. 6e-393 approved the City ft"Cer's reossmoeseatios of Crus Devslopaest sad Associates. Ltd.. as a lisitsd partssrs%ip. as the developseut sstity to develop parosl 10. t♦a, parcel fa.' se and parcel go. gA of the phase I Dedsvelopasst Area is a000rdasoe with the development proposal subaitted and is oempliasoe with the #stied Development Project preoedures w see fort% is the city of via" Charter. section tts(o). mad 1 WMULSM. She City ComsUssloa by lesolution se. 46-08. said directed the City Maaagsr to negotiate a land dispositlos agreement with Crus Development mad Associates. LTD. mad to present the negotiated agreement to the City Caaaissioa for approval. and RUJAS, the City Commission bT Resolutions No. 67-141 approved the land disposition agreement with Criss DarvelopsNat and Associates. LTD.: mad •ZEMS, it was the City Comslnsios's intent that the development agreement with Crux Development sad Associates. LTD. vas sobjeot to the following rsquirsmsats: 1. The City must obtain a aatisfaotorT residual reuse appraisal specifying that the rental paTmests duo mailer the ejreemest are not less than fair value for the Yes Is accord"" with the southeast Oversews/Fars Uot_ Redevelopaest plan. S. Crum Developaeat and Associates. LTD. rust initiate construction withla One Tsar of Us February 12. 1967 City Coamissioa approval of the land disposition scress sit. S. The City Manager must reviev the developasmt entity's Minority pastiolpation Flan to lasuro that all major Im Ostraotors have been identified mad that sufficient l risS OIg-390 evidemse have beesprovided eoseeraimg efforts to soot the Cit?'s simeritT participation goals ter the seutheast O►ertows/pars Test tadevelopmost project. REIZAS. due to unforeseen financial and adsiaistrative obstacles. it hue bees impossible for Cruz Development and Associates. LTD. to start oonstructios one year from February 12. 105T. the date the City Commission approved the land disposition agreement: BOW. T9302F s. ss IT 929O1.RD ST Tn COM286200 OF TEN CITY OF •IASI . FIAMDA : section I. Crum Development mad Associates. LTD. is hereby directed to initiate construction, of 4" units by June 1S. SOSS. is parcel To. as for the southeast O►ertown/tart West phase I Redevelopment project. said construction to be completed In tweatT-four (ha) boat he or by July 1000: said time requleites to be made part of the land disposition agreement between the City of Yiaml and Crus Development and Associates. L= . Section 1. The City COmsissi0a hereby requires that Cruz Development and Associates. LTD. pay a penalty of $1.000 for each day the projoot is act completed after July 1000. said penalty to be imposed it said developer can't show justifiable curie as to its !•ability to complete the project on time. seotion 3. The City Commission hereby declares that it Cruz Development and Associates. LTD. has not commenced oonstructlos by Some 19. 10" . its development rights for parcel. No. aa. parcel No. 20 mad parcel No. 36 is phase I of the southeast Overtown/pars Test Redevelopment project are null and void. Section s. The execution of the land disposition agreement hetwees the City of Riasi and Cruz Development and Associates. LTD. will be subject to the following requirements: a. The City must obtain a satisfactory residual reuse appraisal specifying that the rental - 3 - 88-158 1pfmto As* sailor the acreoseat sto set loss thu fair value ter the uses is aeeerdaaoo Pith the southeast OvertovaiPart test 1ede"lopsest t. The CitT Bawer must refiet seek deveiepsest est&tT's useritt Partieipsties Pica to &rare that all major sukeettreeters have toes identified we that ssttieisst srritesoo th teen priVided eesoersiag efforts to most the Citt'e sisoritT partieipat&es (eels for the southeast O►ertevultars •Mt CesssnitT aedevelopsess Prejeot. tAsssD AND AaOfTla thus .LAQ— dat of . i . 000"XAVISS L. SGANW. BATOR ATTM7r / ,f TATTY •IRAI. CITY CL= PRRPARRD AIM APPROYm ST: APPSWO AS TO PORK AND KMZRT P. CLAM WZA A. n S= go CRISP DssoTY CITY ATTOMM IUTT AtTORM Y5:ar:hs6:v64O - 4 - W-! SF 98-390 V J-N-131 2/10/W muorm W. A I WM 1 IOII CQRPIIIC INC Sot1!'tWMT MWM M/PANR Ilse D&tLapplW OF MWOMI. IMPWT. 84MWO TWP AN AKA or "it CITY OF MAN Dlafamw IN 1»2 bT MoE M(P N.D. e2455, AN "It /otnNLWT pYOTtTaM/PAIR MW OSM>IIITY I NDV49APP f! AKA (Moll PARricuLAm r UNKPJM MRINI , PLXGU Nr TD AN APPLICATION FOR DIIY D"W APPIOVAL PIQOW by "S CITY OF MiAMI n M1lM SING A MAdW= DNVOMMM 01 r M I APPIOVING SAID DMLGP4 fr OF RTtWL D@Wf ArM CMGIDMI G THE IOi0N1Q NO f@ MadTam or 71li SO m Ptd1 m I JCWL PLftWM OMWIL AND U11 CITY OF MIAAI PENNING ADVISORN' BMW, 1I WK-r TD "a emelT ram or "a RvM DEVQAPPOfe ON= XrrACM D NfE PVO AS EIMIJUT W, 1W APPLICATION FOR DEVQarN W APPROVAL IMMMWA7W N IN R 10 WN 3, AND "M RROM AND N10x WDATICW or "a am= flGRIDA Rll IGHAL PINNING =INCIL IMOOPP IMM METH br llFORIZI MKINNG FINDINGS of FACT AND OOIIUNN)IGIO OF LAMr PROVTOING Ttlll' INC IMIe'= DZMA mW ONADOt SHALL R sINDDG ON = APPLICWf AND SUCCESSOM IN DifEIf M" DIFMMPG ?a CITY CLOR TO WO WPM OF THIS TAM'UNI01 AM MA MA DEVE OL fe OK= TO AFFf9LM ADOICIES AND "It APPLICANTn DIRCTING TINE CITY MANAGER TO THE ALL ACTIONS MKISLW To FULFILL "a CITY'S OSLIGNrIOIG IN DUt THE MAR= DEYEInPMW ON =$ AND PXNIDING A SCYL WILITY CLI W. wWjwM, on February 6, 1967 , the City of Miami submitted a Complete Application for Development Approval for a Development of Regional Impact to the South Florida Regional Planning Council, the Florida Department of Camunity Affairs, pursuant to T.S. 380.06 (1987), for the ongoing development through the Year 2007 for the area designated -in 1962 by City Caermission Resolution No. 52-755, as the Southeast OvertowVPark West Community Rmdsvelap w. t Area, as legally described in the Development Order attached hereto., and MiERFN, the Miami Flaming Advisory board, at its meeting held an Februsy 3, 1950, It• No. Is. following an advertised public hearing, adopted Rasolution No. PAS 11-66 by a S to 0 vote, YBMPM EC APPROVAL, of the Master Development Order, as elmandsd, for the Southeast Overtaw vPark West Community nity Aadevelapment Area as attachad heretol and WIENCAS, an February 11. 1988. the City Commission conducted a public hearing pursuant to T.S. 380.06 (1987) and 1 CIRMOG OFECNLSSION ATTACHOPTv FES 11 I!6 ENCLO'J A to 91g-340 WHOr i6, the City Caousstah considered the Application for Development Approval. the report and reaasmmndatias of the South Florida Regional Planning council, and each elahsent required to be considered by F.S. 350.06 (1"7); and WN MM , the City Cawi ss i on determined that all requirements of notice and other legal requirements for the issuance of the proposed Neater Develapshent Order had bean ccWlied with; and ) NAGS, the City Commission doom it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami to issue a Master Development order as hereinafter at forthr mm, 'flow=, Be IT mom m or 7= Q7MISSIom of 711E CITY OF NIANI, Fidlm0k: Section 1: The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Low are made with respect to the Project as described in the Nester Developmnent Order for the Southeast Overtowh/Park west Coxamnity Redevelopment Area, which is attached Hereto as Exhibit 'A• and made a part hereof by reference, and is applicable to an area of the City of Miami designated in 1982 by Resolution No. e2-755, as the Southeut Overto rVPark west Community Aedewelopsent Area , as more particularly described in txhibit W. Section 2: The Master Develop hmnt Order for the Southeast Overtomwh/Park west 0 mmntty Redevelopment Area (Exhibit 'A') is hereby granted and issued. Section 3. 7b* City Clerk is hereby authorised and directed to ummadiately send certified copies of this Resolution together with Exhibit 'A" and copies of all exhibits, attachments, and written materials, including portions of ordinances referenced in the text of the Master Development order to: 'Rhe Florida Department of Cxaonunity Affairs, 2571 Executive Center Circle Gat. Tallahassee, Florida, 32301; and The, South Florida Regional Planning Council. 3440 Hollywood Boulevard. suite 140, Hollywood, Florida, 33021. Section 4. The City Manager is hereby directed to take all actions nocessary to fulfill the City's obligations under the terse of the Muter Development Order. Section 5. In the event that any portion or section of this Resolution or the Muter Development Order for southeast Overtown/Park west Crimnnity Redowlcp■ent Area (Exhibit •A•) is determined to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional by a court or agency of conpetent jurisdiction, such decision -2- A8-110 '9g-39n "I in no warMr offset the rMiftiA PWtianl at this IMnletian or the hitter BMIdp Vt OMW tar the laltlNerI 0nrtea/Pe 'R Nest Cs ity And"tiglMo R Aran IMlait •A•1. AM 1w11 swain in trll tare itr ettem. PAN Ale Aor M this "Ibfty at rasrvar 1fN. MIMI cat Ca MSPlNW SM APPIOYia M 7now MY 1M'101 m APPIOM At !C M M AND aJ0 �''11QtI JM'i0�lY JOVAINW #/MM3 -3- 9"10 gIg-390 i e MUT •A• WO Q oMILOPO , southeast Owrtaun/►ark Mwwet Cassnity, 9ldwelap001st Are , On Or 0tWM"I The City of Waml- At1l1fMUD Afidlilf 0t 0W6'IAM Herbert H. Miley, Assistant City ftnN er and Unto Ilo6riyues, Dirsetor, City of Hirai Flaming Osparessant or their PKUBCT 0di01 MCIN: The Project WOWS of dwnelapmsrst in the Southeast Overtawwti/Park Met Casanity Ibderelopmant Area t vfOu9h the year 2007, including the following land uses and incresentss Land uses Increment I Inetemnt II InCrslaent III 2btals t1966-199�1) (1916-19») (1l99-2007) Of f let (gross square feet) 166,000 205,000 632,500 1,003,500 watail/Service/General Casssrcial (gross square foot) 66,200 37,300 90,600 194,100 Hotel (rags) 0 So0 600 1,100 Mesi0ential (dwelling units) 21000 2,000 51000 91000 Convention (gross square feet) 290.000 310,000 0 6001000 Pursuant to P.S. 360.06(22) (1987), the Project sWifies the total assent of dwelopm nt planned for *acts lard use category, but prowides flexibility for such development to be located anys+sser* within the Project Area, subject to local lard develapsent roplatians. The Project Area includes all property within the bowdwl*s of the Southeast Overtown/Park Most Ozesnity Aedeu*lopaant Area, designated in 1962 by City Ommissian glasolution No. 62- 755, as illustrated on the map in exhibit 1 and described in MOM 2 attached hereto. 7t* Project Area oastains a total of apprmbotely 209 acres of land. 1 8"10 1'9-390 r UmIL. MIIPI-ION OF a7SfilfT ptbvWfft Sea idubit 1. =.lMMQWt tts t1N purposse of this ()sve100"t order, the follonrg term well be defined as follawst Am or Awlication for DlvelCPW* 1meaft1 t The original Appliartion for Dsvelopnrt Approval fQ the South et ovatnsWPark West 0=WAUty Rsdevslopnatt Ares filed by the City of MrMai on FdwuUy 6. 1907, pLnuNR to F.S. 390.06 (1967). CAM or aN"idated AimUcation for Develo NW4 h02MNt it,e revised AM prepared pursusrt to paragraph 21 an page 12 herain. Certificate of oocupulpyt A pwmnatt cr tapwuy and/or Partial Catifinte of Ceeulsncy issued, punuut to Section X7 of the South Florida building Code, for arty 'Net New Develgnmt" as defined lterasn. C1t t ",he City of Miaoi. Flarada. cbtsteilS The South Florida Regional Plaming Council. LI M$ ,.he Metropolitan Dade aX ty Department of Dw rarwerual Rewnrc• "U"WAGM . LASS uovelaPisart of RsgUWAl Impact. Developsatt Crdltst The individual units of lard uses included within Ttotal Allowable DevaloPaent, &a measured by square footage. cc rA=ber of dwelling urnts, hotel woos, or seats. Msjar Use Special Perstits A special pauit issued by the City Qmussun pureusM to ordin uws 95M. the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Kum, as ..ended. Nat New Dsvelopsat t Any aorrtruct=n or raaonstruction thicit Will result in a net increase, within any 'Parcel of Land", of residential dwelling unata, hotel moans, seats in attraction/reQesti.on facilities cc gross square footage for office, goverme2t office, retail/service, oxtventun. wholesalt;li ulustrial or institutional uses. Lard uses to be removel by desolitaon of a building or structure stay be credited a"uwt the proposed now 2 A8- 1 1 ' rIV S—V • 70 I land %a• for pucpoaas of dlculatinp the not increase. if the PlAnrunq Duatar determines that there %n o a valid Co tafieata of Owgarcy caastug an the wffectave dote of thia DWVIPP R Order for the land ua• to be dawolished. If a dharge of lard uM is pe4+aed. the Planning Dirsctar may credit the Friar lard tse against the ;spored Iced use based Van aguivalem uWame as awastred by peek hoer vleicle trip generation. Arrf activity rhuih Ire an the effective dote of this Devdopaw* Order a valid building pant or crag curromly stfactive dw►elapeart are+der doll not be included as INt New DeveLopmem. 7Ae Planning Director may seclude frow Net Ner Dsvelop■ont any well developaart under 1O.0m square ten; in floe: arm, it he fide that such develcpawt rvuld hove no repacetal inpaet as aawrd by peak hour vlhicle trip. Parcel of lords, Any gtarrtity of Lrd opable of being deacribed with such definitanesa that its location and bouadari• ay be established, and %duc h is dmignmted by its warner or developer as land to be used or developed as a Nut or %Auc h has been used or dowelopd as a unit. Project: 1That Pro]wt described in the "Pgan= DESC3tIPMON' an Page 1 herouh. Project Area: The arm included within the legal dasQiption in P.ahiblt 2. (Bmw dd by I-95. N. Sth Street and Biscayne Blvd.) mul Allpable Developments The quantity of het Nor Dr^acpawnt far vfuch Certificates of Oom*w wy ay be issued under the tam and aordition s of this Developeom Order. together with any attendant Incrou ntal 4svolgpmwa Order. and as ay be sndifid pursuant to F.S. 380.06(19) (19137). The City ay Penult siauultansoua inw saes and decreasss between the land use catagvries; provided that the regional iapcts of the Lod us• as changed will net escsd the adverse regioal iaptts of the Project as originally app Moved, as messured by total Peak hour vehicle trip. FIWIWA Cr Mcrl The following fieditgs of fact are hereby owdirawd and adopted with respect tq the Project& 3 14"101 c!%3-340 A. The firdangs and deter+a nStiars of fact Get forth in the recitals of the resolution to this Develapa t Order are herby confirmed. s. Vie real property v1►id+ is the subject of this usvelopm a Order is legally described in Ithibit 2. C. The City of Mrae►i filed the ADA with the City, the aoumwcil, and the Florida Departmem of One pity Affair. D. Ih& Ault has bGsn filed by the City of Mum pursuert to F.S. JW.G6(22) (1967) authorisuq the City of Mimi to apply for dlsvela� approval and receive a devolopsa* order for any or all of the arm within its jurisdiction. Individual developments are rot idartified or required to be identified in the CMA. E. the purpose of the OM is to identify and asame probable regional impacts and to obtain approval' for Total Allowable Developisst in accordance with the general guidelines met forth in this Devalopsnnc order and the CWA. The concept is to recognise the Project Arm as a single area of high intensity development and to focus the MI review process primarily an the iuupaets that Total Allowable Lovalo}aert within the area will hove on lard, rater, transom %tie-. �• s�r_� :.::. o marnity services, snergy and other resources and system of regional significance. 'fie CMA seeks a single = review process for overall phased development of the Southeast CHsrtawl/park west Oaasmuty Redevelopment Area rather than re*=irq each individual MI scale developma within the downtown arm to file for asparste DRI reviaw,e. F. Devalop►ant within the Project Arm is apeeted to — wwo to be aoaaiplubed ewer an amended pariod of tiros by a variety of devalopas. which my include the City. 'file developers my respond to market desnd and tdnrologis that an only be stu atd in the CROP. The CMA and the DD are intaded to serve as flexible quids foes planted dsvelapnrt of the Project Arm rather than a precise blusprirt for its developme . Therefore, pursuant to F.S. M.06(21)(b) (1967), the am seeks master developsert approval for three uhQsments of developmm Over s period of uppro:iowrtaly twenty years and specific devalgmant approval for Increaert I, which is the first phase of devolgnsm projected for a period of approxnately five years. Subsequent incrma*al application may need to be adjusted to acre nearly serve " 4 99-ILIC 98-340 4 OPI- a laving ghnde recognizing the evolution of rarkst desand and t erinologi • . G. 2% Project Arm contains a total of approaLMOtely 209 acres. The CNDA peapos• Net New Dev&lCpwert within the Project Area for the land usm, quantitin and Ohasss defined herein as Total Allowable Developsem. N. The Project is not located in an area of critical state concern as dnignstd pursuant to F. i. 380 t 1997) . 1. A au preheraLve review of the probable impacts that will be 94hersted by the Project has been conducted by various City departments, as reflecteu in the CC%. and the South Florida Regional Planing CbUncal staff. Ihm Dsveiopsert order is aonsietert with the report and reoosaadataons of the South Florida Regional Planrhirg Omm=l, entitled 'Develgaert of Regional Ispect Assesenwht for Southeast Overtowrn,/Park Meat Chhsaauty Rdevelo inert Arm - Master', dated January 4. 190. The South Florida Regional Planning Council recaeserds approval of the Project, and all conditions to which such approval is subject are reflected herain. K. The Project ie coftiatent with the applicable portion of the State land developaa* plan and the Regional Plan for South Florida. L. The Project is in aonformity with the adopted Minas Caq wshosive Neighborhood Plan. M. the Project is in accord with the distract wring classification of Zoning ordinance 9SW. as mended. N. The Project will have a favorable ispct an the ocon0fey of the City. P. The Project will efficiently use public transportation facilitim. Q. The Project will favorably affect the nod for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their placan of ssploymm. R. The Project wall efficiently use necessary public facilities. S. The Project will include adequate aitigative measures to assure that it will rot adversely effect the amirorsent and natural resources of the City. T. The Project will not adversely affect living condition in the City. U. :he Project will not adversely affect public safety. V. 'where is a public need for the Project. Q.1iC1lSiQAb OF IJWh S Rog—i i n• IDS-390 e ",hat. having made the findugm of fact comamAd above. the City am4m&m herby ameludsm as a matter of law. the follatringr A. the City of Miam► aging am a "aarttwn devalapert auumity' as .r defined in F.i. 3W (1967). and is authorised by F.S. 38b (19 7) to Rake application far ddwedapsett apprvval and receive a developnent order. a. the Project GWli• with the Miami ampr4howive NeigttbcrtmmW Plan, is mrnmistet with the arderly develapWrt and gasis of the Qty'of Kim", and aogli• with local lard deVelapaatt regulatuxa. C. 'fie Projectt does not umamrably interfere with the adtievesat of the objectives of the adoptd State lard development Plan applicable to the City of mime or the Rsqiansl Plan for Sash Florida. D. 11ie Project is aomistect with the report and reoaI tionm of the Sash nmida Regional Plarninq O,xsncal and does not unreasonably interfere with any of the oarrideratiom aid objectives set forth in F.S. �W (1967). E. Qta m sn the Project %juch do rat mceero the Total Allowable Wwalopient er whidt do not result in a net rductim of sore than 5 percent in tau♦ acreage sonar and developed as cty parks, shall riot ootmtitute a substantial deviation under F.S. 38D (1967). 'chat, havuq made the findings of fact and reached the cm=lusionm of law not forth above, it is ordered that the Project is hereby approved, sub)wt to the following conditions Tm am rr5 oxxnems. AiD/cR ASmm JOINIi y at sr.,mmy MY ISSN ktJUA) IC FEW175 AND CEMrICMW Or OCCUPANCY Pat Wr AN WMA)D W PLWJAWT TO AN APMM DDUDRfW OROM PM EMN DICRDGW CESClIMM HEREIN AND SFKLs 1. Rs*=e all developma pitsu u t to this Develcpeest Order to be in aemrdance with applicable building order. lard dwelgp sm regulatimm, crdammes end other lawn. 2. Within to mornthte of the effective data of this Development Order, adopt and implement a unr.faea ordirtaince that incorporates a requsresent that 6 A9-11C 03-340 Not Nov Dsvelapnrnts *011 mulch, spray or plant grass in e2oaed arms to prevent soil arosian and aiaiaise air pollution during construction. 9. WithLn 6 moths of the effactiw date of this Devala1 Order, adopt and isplemm a unhifa m ordinance that uw w porats a requLremert that Net New oevelopaernts shall, place temporary screens, berms, and/or rLp- rap aeourd sits under onstruction to filter or retain stern ester runoff during anstrru&Aon. e. within 6 moths of the effective date this Development Order. adopt and in+plewst a uwaam ordinance or staMub an accepted procedure to raghnire Mt New Develop mmits to' design. construct and ELLm aLn aI ter mana-see t system to meat the -following standw& h a. Main die runoff from at least a 5-year storm an sch itrcal of laid dherever fmssblo and construct drainage system as proposal in the Omwladsted Appliataon far Devalcpsent Apptwal (011y.) • Oxotatem with the OAM individual dm& age systems mast be designed to retain at least the first one-mc h of starswater runoff within drainage walls and sfiltration trshchm. b. Install pollutant retardant structures (catch basin with downrtuansl Wat pipe or other Dade Oxsty Dl7M-appmvd device) to treat all stormuter rnanff at mch individual drainage structure and/or well, and periodically remove pollutant accumulations. C. Wait application of pesticides and fertilisers in vagetatd atone water retention areas to once per year for proreniuve ■sin omwe and to emergencies. such as ushaontrolled insect infestation. d. Vacua sweW all parking lots of eleven or more vehicle space and private romb" serving the parking lots at leset once per week. e. Both during and fcllcwirg construction, prevent the direct flow of atoe>arater runoff (that has not been pro -treated pursuant to Oonditum 6a. above) into surface waters. 7 99-110, S-3:90 5. Ro*ur! Net Near Detvelopadnt to aoAply With Dbde Cousty hazardous Wte rehuirensts by the adoption and kVIdm ntatim of a urufam ordinance, as my be found by the City to be applicable and necessary, providing for hasar+dcus materials accident prevention. mitigation, aril ruponae standards, as described in a. through h. below. Thess standards shall be maantaumd by individual develapot w1w shall require by lease agrsmaent or building rule that all tenants classified by a SIC mle lasted in Appendix 12A-8 of the C DA. i.x=pm ted herein by Adermre, that use, handle, stare. display, or generate hazardous materials (matera&la that are ignitable, corrosive, tatic, or reactive), irnlurduq those identified an page 6 of Appendix 12A-4 of the C A comply with these standudet provided however, that the uses in and the Wastes listed to Appendix 12A-8 of the C M dnall be ouwltanoualy amended upon the addition or deletion of cry or all of the listed uses, materials. or Wastes by amisA ent to the "Cbu my and Requxal Hazardous ►taste Assesmaernt Guidelines" incorporated by Rule 17-31.03(2), Florida Adnurustrative Code. At a minimaea, these standards *alit a. R.a31ra •W+.0 b._13ugs or portions of buildinys where hazardous materials or hazardous Wastes, as defined above, are to be used, displayed. handled, generated, or stared shall be constructed with u%mrvum floors, without drain. to ensure contaun nt and facilitate cleanup of any spill or leakage. b. Prdtibit any outside storage of hazardous materials or hazardous waste. The sxceptian to this condition is for retail goods typically associated with residential nursery activity, such as ISM fertilisers and garden pesticides. Throne areas used for the star'bge of these goods are subject to the requi.raunt contained in Gondition Sc. below. c. Rm*ars that any arcs used for loading and/or unloading of hazardous material be covered and equipped with a collection systca to contain leLkage and accidental spills. d. , Require all hazardous ate generators to contract with a licensed public or private hazardous waste disposal service or p mcess M e q:i-11 ('* -rg-390 or facility 0.LA provide Dada axa�cy ISM Copies of the Eollarv�y fags of daeunstation or pups hasasd ub wnuts OW0940ar+t peaeticess • a haBandou wta manifesto ' • *%is I to a parnittd hasard" waeta senkgo net dcilaty, or - a confirmation of receipt of materials f:a, a racycter or a %mete eadnange operation. e. rr4%ojt generation of hasardons effluents. unless adequate taeilitaes, approved by Oade a nBty MW and Florida Lx*Wtsert of PPnvironnsrital Regulation, are constructed and used by tanants gessMcarng such effluents. f. &Up=* of hasartbu sludge Nsterials generates by effluent pre-trstiaert in a manner approved by the Federal Orviran antal Prate tion Agency and the Florida us artma nt of Dnvsronsental Regulation. g. Notify bny tarsrnt generating casts of the penalties fc-- disposal of harardan waste pursuant to P.S. 403.727. h. Allow reasonable access to facilities for monitoring by We County Ol711, Council staff, and the Florida Dgartmet of Dw=Gnmental Regulation to assure oapliance with this Development 0rdar and all applicable laws and rsgulaticne. 6. !Duct an ordinance requiring hat New Developsent to remove all aweaave antic plants, including Malalsuca, Casuarim, and Smilian Pepper, from their Parcel of lard as the parcel is cleared, and use only those plant species identified in Appa di: &4 of the a" for lardsaping. Additional Macias my be used only if Kitten approval is pro wukd by Council Blatt. Such approval will be based an the species under Consideration sating the folla" rsiteriar a. dos not require excessive irrigation b. donot require excessive fertiliser applicstion C. , s iS not grans to insect infestation or other pasts 9 S" 10 19g-340 d. is not prate to disease e. On not have invasive root systan f. sudt other criteria as nay be appeq[uto �. DirWt the City Manager to sstabliift procedure %Mriny the Police D*wRa-nt and Fire DepartmHM ball sake rowwaoubtiots to innorporate security sa avow into the design erd operate m of Not NOW DsveLopaset. A. mllsbwote with the Dade Obutty 5klnool Board, by p ovidini) Pl&MLnx7 Lrtfarsation and inforoation an Met Men DavolgMM of residential units, to sates concerts regarding the availability and aocea to rndnols for students fraa future residential devaloptawe within the project arm . 9. Dwounge the inoorp rstion of energy Conservation s+aeur• into the design and operation of Net Now DsveLoptsent by requiring that, at a au umn. all Net New Development shall be corstrurted in aonforsartce with the sp@caficstiors of the State of Florida EnWW Efficiency Code for Building Construction (State Energy Code). .G. :w part of the building patnit application. Prior to approving any activity involving rehabilitation, denolition, or structural dwugm to historic buildings listed in Exhibit 3 herein, require the apPiiant to submit to the Florida Deputment of State Division of Archives, History, and ltecnr I Matagment and the City of Kisai Planning Department photograpu of the structure and a d@arsiption of proposed activities for ass@sosatt of the potential effect an the historic prgmmy. Prior to approving any pwm&t for ground disturbing activities related to construction cc tree reaoval within the archaeological xonas listed in Exhibit d hersin. require the applicant to contact these aass two agencies to sake arsargsaents to survey and assets the arm. this oondition will not apply to those historic buildings and archeological cones that are designated as Heritage Oorservation districts pmmusnt to paragraph 12 be' . 11. Attempt to have all propaties and archaeological stones in Exhibits i and i harem designated as Heritage Cbmavation districts under Article 16 of Zoning Ordmwwe 95W, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami. Florida, as randed. C, 98-11c 9?S-390 Of 10 ::. Fbr all deyalapM* activity, other than devedaprenc an •it• corhtainai in Ealubits l and 4 herein (Diner these sat• are P bjett to amUtion 11. and 11. above), as part of the building pernut appliance require ' the applicant. pursuart to state law, to notify the Florida Departmarht of State Division of Ardtivas, History and Records Marsq Bent of coe+Dtruttio+ achakAm. and where potentially Digrufioaet historical or archseologial artifacts are uncovered during omwtruttion, pelait State and local archeological officials to survey and onavate the site. When ree uiranl by law, delay construction for ugh to 9 months in any portion of the aoestawtion site necessary to penait the archeological survey and excavation to be omspleted. 13. Moeitor Mrelopmk and redvmdcpmnt activities to ensure that fs mch habitable unit of low income ho»uq eliminated as a result of public action within the pro jact area. the City will assist in the provision of standard low uwmw housing through now oorhstruction and/or rdhabUitatum within the City of Miami. Any net lose of habitable low - moose units within the study arm marat be counterbalanced by a gain in anctlher arm of the City. 14. Withhold the issuance of building permts for Net Nor DeNelapsant that cannot obtain a letter of availability from the appropriate agency that wastewater treatmannt capacity will be sufficient to meet the nseds of that development. 15. Withhold the issuance of builduq permits for Net Nev Developent that cannot obtain a Utter of availability from the appropriate agency that an adequate water supply will be available to most the needs of that developm*.. 16. Withhold the issuance of buildirq peshaits for lief New Development that cannot obtain a letter of availability from the appropriate agency that solid waste disposal apeity will be sufficient to meet the needs of that develquMIL. 17. Haves the authority to abase developsoht for its kxWortionate share of the costa of improveeents and/or services necessary to monitor &War 11 89-iic 9S-3y0 festagate any adverse inpscta. lh* sty *hall else have authority to asesse dsvalopsert its proportnio ute share of the costs attributable to pre arstian of the sorter plan for the Sonsheast Overtawry ltrk West o2sme uty ReRwalapeeet Arm. the Application for Devalopeert Approval. and thus Developwst Order. as well as the future costs of reviewug individual devatcpMI applicatiarr. rs:nnitorinng ataylisnoe with this Dev&Lcp mt Order, and arty other costs reasonably relates to the adairustsatim and isplemenntatton of this Developm4m ceder. "if nsceeMcy, the sty drall establish a procedure fov rebating arty fads collected in esreae of those funds attributable to a particular development and necessary to ispleraent this Davatopeent Order or any 9 Unarm or procedure required to monitor and enforce oaplianee with this Developeant Order and to mitigate the impacts of Total Allowable Developssm ." pc la . �' AiD ��$ :6. The C►ty shall monitor the capacity of 'Total Allowable Dwetoppee nt by rem.rvuq the aaourt of Developme Credits necessary for Met New Develgmm* at a time, to be detertaind by the City, prior to or coincident with approval of a building permit or !a jor Use Spcsal peewit. I%@ CGty duall place reasonable time limits on all building peewits and rnjor Use Special Penaits to auure that construction progresses within a reasonable period of time after approval to prevent starkpslinq of reservation for Developnant Credits. 7h@ ties period established by the City shall take into account the size of the pr+opimed Net NOW Devalopmant in ralatiorwhip to the tic» necessary to begin oRnstrvction. 19. upon the issuance of a Certifioste of Ooip nt�a y for any Net New Devaloileat. the City shall wake appropriate subtractions fsva the anout of Total Allowable Developeent udw this Dsyslo� order. ND Certificates of OCcUpwvy shall be issued for Net NM Devalopreit whu:h would. in the aggregate. coxed the Mount of 'Total Allowable Devalopert under this Developaert Ordt. 12 gR-11 P 4�g-390 4. 2u. :!,* c,ty t1+a11 i,nntegra to all original and supplemental ArA Lrsfammtion into a ampolidated Application for DevaLapret Approval (00%0 and swmt two amiss of the a" to the Oxmil, one aopy to the Qty -01 Clerk. and ors Copy to the Florida Departset of OMWMty Affairs vsthin thirty (30) days of the effective date of this DevelgSm" Order. The *J A Mull be prepared as follow r a. *we now, clarifiad, or revised info mtian w I Frdwd eubeequert to eubaittal of the ADA but prior to iasuanre of tnis DMve,Lepm* Order, %bather in mpotre to As fomsl states ett of anfamation nadd or otherwise, the original pages of the " will be replaced with rsvisai pages. b. Revised pp• wall have a 'Age las►ber (it) - oats' notation. with 'Age Ojdm' being the nusber of the original page, '(11)' udicatuq that the }age w revised. and 'out*' statue; the date of the revision. 21. 'fie 0onolidated 1Wplia.taon for GsvalaFrrent 1W rOval is uioorporated herain by :::we... a,d wL" oe raiaeo upon by the parties in dis&arguq their statutory duties under F.S. 3W (1967). and load ordinances. 5lbstantial ompliance with the factual rgwmatatiaa contained in the ammolidsted Application for Devalgxwvt AFpC0val ss a condition far approval unless wawa or modified by agressae t aenorq the council, Qsty, and Applicant, its suacessors, and/or assigns. 22. AU temp. proposals. suggestions and proca&wm proposed us the Application far Devalapmett Approval. but not specifically inaorporetd in this Dewalopmeeit Order, shall not be considsd a Part of the Oarsoiidated Application far Development. AFprwal insofar as they may have been deemed to place a raquisanment an the City of Mimi to take any action or attain fm taking any action. The tens of this Development Order shall omarol and any requirements of the City are specifically enumerated herein. 2.1. the following regional issues as they appear in the mrmsolidated Application for Development Approval have been sufficiently reviewed for the teal Pm3sct (artenduq through the year 2W7) and shall ntit be 13 98-ii(' 4�g-39n re0ared to be revieAM as eadh Anwar al portion of the Baahaet Ovetern/Park Mat Oiswnaty ItsWeiop wit. Are MI is oWmatedt nW t Map A - Location Map 6-1. 9-2. s-). 9-4 - Aerial PM*($) Map C-S - Flood Zone Map O►1 - saistuq Ltd use M1p a - sails Mp Ir - vegetation 1 Map 0-1. 0-2 - Draiepe Mays I-1, 1-2, 1-2, 1-4 - Pblic lfcilitla Ouatice $t water ouality *"Klan it walaeds ouseticn 7: Flood Prone Areas Questum sat Vegetation atd Wildlife Ouestion to Historical and Archaeological Sita Question 12: Other Public Facilities C. bmw D. Education E. Recreation and Open Space Question A: Hmoug ;iC the folla diM regionl Umua as they appar in the Onnwlideted Appliastum for Devslcpsert Approhral have rot been suffieiatly reviewed far the total Project (astandinj through the year 2007) atd, ere appeapriate, will be required to be reviewd as each inersasntal portion of the So:theast OvertasVPark west Omwwaty Rdsvelapm* Arai MI is subaittdt huatum 1s Applissrt Infas'ation Maps Map M - water Developaet Map J series - Transportation Network Display Graphics and Boards 14 98-110 q9-39Q 10 Ouation �t Project Deselaption Question 4h Air Quality Question lot dployment and Somatic tlharacteristao Qwrtion !It 'ilanspartataah Question 121 Other Public Facilities ' A. haetawter. Water. and'Solid waste s. walth Ore. lblice. and Fire 25. Grouedr for denial by the South Florida Regaonsl Planting Obuneil of any subsequent applications for an incremental portion of this peapaeed developmrt will be United to any unresolved issues pertaining to Question Ih Air Quality and/or Question 11h Zlanspartation. 2b. :Ae City Mail prepare an aural report and aubsut aopa• to tut Doncal. the City Clerk and Florida V partnent of Community Affairs an or before each annavereary dote of this Developaert Order. As each A—+-0 uM►amit receivas a Gevelopsent Order. the annual report shall include the developme covered by the incresuntal Development Order so that a "It annual report is ompiled for the entire Projwt. 'Rue annual report shall include. at a hairhinsuu a. A aanplete response to each question. in E dhibit 5. b. Identification and domwiption of any knahm changes in the plan of developwvt. or in the rgwmentations ow"ind in the C11GA. or in the Phasing far the reporting year and for the nett year. C. A wsaary GMWW ran of Ybtal Allarsble Developneht and Net New Dwelapmm peaposd and actually appcwd during the year. antluding loaatiors. aQesge. .guars footage. of units. and other units of Lad uses included within Yotal Allocable Dsvelopnnt, and the acreage Boned and developed as aty parks. d. An assesssert of the APpliaant's and the City's ompliance with the aonditUxw of approval Contained in this Developaat Order and the aaa fitments %+hidh are contained in the AppUcatzon for 15 QQ_1 4 r% 98-39d DsvalopmteAppevval and %kidh hove been identified by the City, the Council. or the D4parwt of 02munity Affairs as beam, sifftitiaan t . e. specification of any known incremental or aawrded DRl applications for devaiopaet approval or rqussts for a subetantial deviation determination that were filed in the reporting year or to be filed dutirq the nmt year. , f. An iidic tion of dhange, if any, in City jurisdiction for any portion of the devalopsmt mars issuance of this Development order. 9. A statement that all person have been sent copies of the enrwal report in confer ence with F.S. 380.0b(16) (1967). h. A copy of any recorded notice of the adoption of this Development ardor ar any wbequent aodifiation that worms recorded by the Applicant pursuant to F.S. 360.06 (15) (1W). i. A rqm t f.-am =YIN ref . ty sawn vioiations of the harardkm waste rquiramemta contained in paragraph 5 herein. J. The numbs of law-inmmairg ho%omq units lost from demolition and conversion within the Project. Area, " well as the total mambo of raw low in000e housing units within the City. k. Any other information required by the Dpartment of Ummuuty Affairs (OM) in accordu cs with F.S. 3W.06(19)(1967). 27. The deadline for aomersmcing any develop * shall be two (2) years fraa the effective date of this Development Order. The tsainstion date for completing developaart *all be Dcaber 31. 2007, provided that the Applicant, or its suocemsars and assign, oomph• with paragraph A herein. Th* termination date way only be modified in aocordmnce with F.S. 360.06(19)(c) (1%7). 26. ibe effective date of this Developmnt Order still be 45 days from its trabouttal to the Florida Department of Otasaszity Affairs. O"wil, and Applicant: pnwided, however, that if this Development Order is 16 qg-390 appealed, the dfemtive date will not start until the day after all appeals lave been wiU16nom or resolved parsuart to F.S. 380.07(2) (1"7). 29. 'Due City shall tat violate any of the conditions of this 1>Iwraialsment order or otherwise fail to act in substantial compliance with eras Owralopaant order or paeait any peoperey ownw within the boatdarise covered by this Development Order to violate any of the prarias of this Deirelapmeit order. in the went any entity aonLrolled by the AppUMM and/or the City or any pia atttes or larnmlowmer of any Parcel of Lind violates (hereinafter ~violator') the provisions of this Develgmwm Order. the City shall stay the effectiveness of this Deve1gmm t Order as to the Parcel of I nd, it %nidn the violative activity or amdurct has occurred wd withhold feather peaats, approvalst and services for devetopau an said Parcel of lard. upon paasage of any appropriate resolution by the City, adoptd in accordance with this section, firdirq that suds violation has occmard. 'Du violator will be given written notice by the City that stateer 1) the nature of the purported violation. end 2) that unless the violation is curd within 30 days of sad notice, the City will hold a public hearing to ox&ider the matter within W days of the date of said notice. , 1n the evert the violation is not curable in 30 days, the violator's diligent good faith efforts, as determined by the City, to cure the violation within that period will obviate the need to hold a public hearing and this Development Order will remain in full force and effect unless the violator does rat diligently purses the =alive action to omsmpletacn within a reasonable tine, in rhidn event the City will give 15 days rotice to the violator of its intention to stay the effactiva see of thin Developaernt Order and withhold further permats, approvals, and services to the Parcel of land inbluc n the violation has occurred and until the violation is cured. She taus of this paragraph may be modified from time to Lima by written agreement by the MA. the City, and Omxmmcil staff, to enable the City to adarce the tern& of this Development tmrder to the fullest eatat, %hile p m widm q due process to alr Developers under this Development order. 17 RR-11 n ^g-394 XG. '.he sotc vpLrk west project Director, la hereby designst4a to ta3hator aaVlianea with all ootditiom of this Dayslopment Order and Mall have the duty and authority to interpret the pcvvisnans of this DavelcPW t Order aced to prcmi4pte rulings, regulations and procdur• necessary to impleweut it, pmvidsd the sun are not inconsistent with the t sus herof or of F.S. 360 (1997) , Or duly prtltl"t d aced adopted ruler thereunder. Appola to decisions of the Project Director sty be filed purauart to procedures set forth in Article 30 of 950u, the boning Ordinance of the CYty of Mini, Florida. as mo nded. Any rormWliance "ll be subject to the providcro of paeagrapu 31 herein. 31. The Sash Florida Regicrsl plaerrinq Quncil MU report ono rsoowerdatiom. entitled 'D@valope* of Regional Lsqact Arawti for Southeast Ovwtarrl/park Meat mawauty Rdevelopieent Arm - Moster', dated January 4. l%V, is incorporated herein by reference. J2, within 30 days of the effective date of this Developeent Order, it shall be recorded with the Clark, Lade QDuanty Circuit Qxrrt, pursuant to F.S. l60.06(15) (1987), specifying that the Develgzmnt order runs with the land and is banding an the Applicant, its suocassocs, and/or assign, jointly or severally. 33. 'the eristerre of this Developeeht order shall rot act to limit ar prvsoribe the rights of any person under F.S. s6O (1967) to file an Application for Devalcpmert Approval and obtain an individual develcpsent order for property covered by this Develapeert order. not withstanding the mistence of this M►elopme* order. In the event that such an individual developeet order is approved and boomse effective, the individual dsvelopwet order _shall control devetlopaent of the peopaty covered by the individual develop me ocdec and the tens and aonditicns of this Dsvelopsert order shall no Lonper be binding upon the ptopaey. Any such individual develapeet orders shall. by their tens, be auueument with the ab jectives and corditicns of this Devalopusnt order. 34. 2his Developum* order ehsll not repeal. nor awed in any way, any other currently effertivs deveLopmet order cc building penut within the 18 99-110 9IS-340 sub,ct arm pr vu ly issued by the City 02a seLan Pucsuent to F.S. 3tu t:967s. lua Devalapset Order shall not crate sW authorise the acation or iapoaitun of arty additioral requara ants at restriction, with rsspatt to any prmw* or future development urder "'currently atfwLive Developsewt Order or building permit issued prior hereto. Natwithsvrdiiq this pus9m h, the City *011 cofntman to have ulateva authority prsuwa to law it sty now have or my acquire in the future (other then by virtue of this Dv►slapwt Order). f 3S. 9hLs DevNopset Order dwali not create nor ispose any additioni rsqu►rew*A car restrictions you the City with raspwt to its pwwo to enact iop t fee or assesoset ardu sneers an dswalopsek, including Net New Dewelopsmt urder this Develapsak Order and future developwt of the City. as cud h ispct fees or assound is my be authorised by law. 36. In the ever that a substantial deviation is detannined under the tsruss of this Develop mt Order or F.S. 380 (1997), the City shall retain its ability to issue builduq paints and Mt jor Use Special Paints .rd shell continue to do so ursebeted. subject to the tares and conditions of this Develapsat Order. 37. In the event that this Develapsat< Order is subject to litigation %herain an in junction is issued siayuq the eforvow t of this Devalopwit Order, the Cary sail anther, under this Developsent Order or urder the powers granted it by state law, be paiaittd to onntLnue to issue building permits and Major Use Special Permits until such time as a final rasolution of the litigation occurs. A. Upon the adoption of the local governaant omsipraharaive plan pursuant to F.S. 163.3161 (1965). as asmmsded, for the City of Musa. the City say rescind this Meter Develop m* Order at the amplation of the first in> rasiet in the evert that the City, after a public hearmq, dew such action is in the best interest of the City. 19 91 "10 "IS-39C —We 50 . SOUTMNABT OVENTOWn / paaK wmmv imsaw= rc sciumc UUTMEA8T OVERTOWN / PAAK WE" — a @NNW t j wa tsatrtca s► srs�ta ►tst�ttttt tests at a ►olet at the latermsetlee of the Motes it" of note it% ttteet= thante vast N the eeotot ISM of N.V. kh tetaet (ad N.V. fth stt"t) to the east ROV It" of 1-95 to the aeeth am 1t" of I-M to tho eeotor Use of tlseatoe YrloeerO= thaea aootherly N tho peter line of Oteeatee Owlorar/ to the Peter of Muriel. The aboso describe/ area costal" sem. `'g-390 [JR 0 II 111111111111 1111111 II I111111111 illll: �� I111111111 111111 11�1111111111111111 REE M T01U) DINER TUM STATIO WTUI 1"T f a rmw mm 11 "M Ial IWVq Ip uwww (ETiElM FETMBT CPAC 2111 THE awls? CNIKII) state of Florida N pottaoot of Community Affairs sLN •s1•ss bureau of Load Sad Worst Nesegsmeat 1511 Rseestive Castor Circle, Root tallehassee. Florida 1lf01-s!A• ( 90e) 418-4923 labsectioo 160.Od(16)1 ►lortde statutest please the rosposelbility oa two developer of as approved seveto►eset of 10816**1 Impact (011) for subsitties as Samuel repo t to the local goversmeat, the gas/•sal Pleasing Osssell the 11601rtuest of Community Affairs, sod to all •fleeted permit agngefes, as ebb date specified is the sevelepuest Otdof. the faller* of a developer to @"belt the report •e the data spealtiod is the dovelopa*st order may result in the tompecar► esopomotom of the developeesc order by the local goversuest mstti the easeai report to submitted to the review asomeloo. this r*gairew et applies is all Oev*&o►ueetg or legless& Impact whieh have lea• approved •tees August •. 1980. It Too bows day questiose shoat this required report, call the Ott Rsforeemost Coordimstor at, (904) a8s-4025. flags• mead the ofigteal completed assual report to the dooigest*d local geversuest effttial stated to the developmest with (1) eepy to seek of the fallowlass a) The regional plaselog •toot? Of Jefaiditiesl ►) All affected porsitties •@*sates; e) Nivisioa of Resource ►lass!•@ sad Nssesoment Bureau of Load and Voter Naaageuest 2371 Rxecucive Coster Circle, Rest Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Please format you? ASeuel States Report otter the refuse example provided below. ANNUAL STATUS RR►OST Reportles ?*Tied* to Neat Oaf iaaT ems rsac Mvelopmsat: * Ease of Loeati•ss City minty so we is per: Names Company Nees Address! trees Loestles City, state. gap Code A8-11C. CIS-340 Mow • ' P"o• i) •wart►e say them•s$' Sad@ to the proposed P1em of development, pbasles. of Is the represestattes• eoetalsed to the Appllestles for Development A•Orevol alose the Movele�seat et tetiemal tspeet received approval. Please note ash Matisse (substeattal determinations) takes by loss& •ow*remest to address these choose$. Metal It a teepee** to to be sore than was oest*see, atteeh as tahlblt 'A' a detailed description et sash choose sod copies of the eedfflod oft* plan drawings. snbibit 'A' should also address the follevia• additlsmal Items it applicable. e) Describe choosec In the files of develop" st or pbootev for the reportieg year sod for the subseqmest yeares ►) state say !noes Iseremestal OIL app&lestiess for developeast approval or requests for a substastial deviation detersimaties that were tiled is. the reporting year and to be filed defied the sent years a) Attach a copy of any motteo of the adoptlom of a development order or the saboo4sest modttiesties of an adopted development order that was roeordod by the developer /uremosc to Subosettos 380.06(14)(d). /./. t) Moo there bee* a c►oose to local goveressat jurisdiction for say portion of the develops*@& •Imes the dowetopeast order was issued? It ee. has the aseenie• legal $*foremost adopted a GeV Development of te•losal Impact de•elopeast order for the project? Please provide a copy of the order adopted by the assents$ local SoVersSeat. 1) Provide copies of say revised •eater M ass. Iscromestal site Teas. *cc., met previously submitted. Note: It a resposes Is to be more them ee• or two seatesces. attach as tahibit 't'. A) Provide a summary eemparless of developssst acti,Vtty Proposed mod actually eoodueted for the reportlo• year. • tsseplet Number of dwelling voice goestrmgted. site Improvements� late sold. acres Stood. •rose floor area coestracted. barrel of storage capacity completed, hermits obtalsed. ate. voter It a resposes is to be more them gem senteses, attach as tshlbit 'C'. S) love say amdoweloped tracts of land is the developSsat (ethst thss isdltidual clntle-festly lots) bass sold to m •@Perot* oatlty or developer? If so. Idestlfy treat, its else. sad the buyer. Please provide mays which show the tracts involved. Tract Borer A8-11C 4�g-390 1 pop. 0 ILOW-0f-0f Note: It a response to to be liars them aaa aestenso. attach so tahibit 'a'. 6) Describe any leads pwrehaoed at optioned adjoesot to the original Development of Regional tape** site **hostages to loosseea of the development order. Identity such load, its sites sad istooded sea as a site plan sad sap. Point it' a response to be were than sae soateses, attach as tahibit 'a'. 7) List say substantial total. star*, and tsdsrsl p*ralts which have boom obtained, a►pli*d for, of dasi*d, duttsl this reportiol period. $poetry the agency. typo of permit, sod duty for each. Mote: if a response to to be sots the* osa s*st*sce, atts*% as 92hibit '/'. 8) A000es the dovelopaoat'o sad legal @*foremost's eostio*tas e*spllasee with a*y eoaditieso of approval contained Is the Dal develepagat order. Mote: Attach as L:hIbIt 'C'. (see attached fora) t) provide say information that is specifically regoArod by the Du v*lopsest Order to be tseloded is the osaaal report. 10) provide a statement cortifyies that all ►er@*** hove boos sent Copies of the annual report is g*st*rmssgo with feb000llone.100.06(14) sod (16). ?.1. parson completing the questionnaires lo►rosestiags "-110 `'g-390 1 J-•b-132 2.'l0,'Sb ifisT mmmmlfaff Or P crmL IP Aff. mcm l tm AN AM% OF M CITY Of PRMI DMICWM M l"I BY IUSOUMGN MD. e1` 7ss, As 2M So1R1OM 0 M VIO N/PW AW CO MiS1ITY IMEVEIMMM AMA (P PNMCULAILY OfMMM MWIN), RMI KWfF 10 AN APPUCATIOM FOR OLVfiii PVW APPROVAL by 7W CM Or NLAPII: mn"MIfINC No IiIOmpMR I OEVOAPPeR OfNR: APPIOVIND SAID DEMaPM OF RMIQ M DVALT ArM 5WM RAMDA R> IGNAL PUN M =MML NO 7W CI7T OF PUAPU PLAMIRIG AOVIMM f 01VD, StI.1<T 10 7NE ODZOITIOIM OF IM IiC� I DSiRtMPMff Of M"CM MMM AS EMTKT •A•, "M WUCXr= FOR DbVRIAXMW APPROVAL. INOMK>WM Mf( I FIR IM 0es fT. AM 791E WOW AND VAXMO WW OF TST SM M RLll M MIGNAL PWeIING COMM 11030M M I M BY IIVOOCE: WING FIND1Mla OF PACT AND CONCUMMM OP Urri PROVIDING 711AQ' T! 1143mIOfF I WMWP=ff ON= SIIAIL bE BINDING ON 7UE APPLICANT AND fI<1['CeY IN IPIIfJ W: DIFWr1lG 7WR C177 CUM 70 SIM OWIM of 7MIs Ism un7ON AND TML 11MM JG I DZVpaMWr ORDER 70 APFOLW AGECIM AND 70 APPLICAMri DIP*MNG TIE CITY PMIV= 70 TARE ALL AMOS MCCCOSARY 70 F"ILL WE C17T'S CZLIGR27CM OIDfO "M INCPVVff I DEVELDROfr OIOERi AND PFOMING A SL%TJMILt7Y CUM. WMFJVAC, rr February 6, 1987, the City of Pliaini autmitted a oaplete Application for Developsent Approval for a Developesiht of Regional tspect to the South Florida Regional Planning Council, the Florida Departwwvt of Community Affairs, pursuant to F.S. 380.06 (1987), for the ongoing dmlcppwht through the Year 2007 for the area designated in 1982 by City Oaiwissim Aesolition No. 82-755, as the Southeast Overtom/Park Meet Cammnity Rsdmlaprent Area, as legally described in the Development Order attached hereto; awed Ialf.WM. the Pliant Planning Advisory board, at its msetinq held on February 3, 1986, Item No. lb, following an advertised public hearing, adapted Aeeolutien No. PAD 12-08 by a 0 to 0 vote, I M mr APPROVAL of the Increment I Development order, as asaidsd, for the Southeast Overtam/Park West Camunity Ardevelapment Area as attached heret0i and WNWM. on February 11, 1988, the City Camnission conducted a public hearing pursuant to F.S. 380.06 (1987); and ATTACHMENTS ENC;.4%";ED I 'r COMMSS10N )ffx ING Or FEB 11 19ee r .. 8"11 7 V Nltam , the city _amission considered the Application for Develapment Approval, t"e report and reamwrndations of the South Florida lryional Planning Council, and each element required to be eonsidersd by I.S. 380.o6 (1987); and .. WHEMM , the City Ccmi ssion determined that all requirements of notice and other legal requirements for the issuance of the prapoMd Increment I Development order had been caWlied withs and W R AS, the City Camsission deems it advisable and in the bestlinterest of the general welfare of the City of Mimi to Issas a Increment I Development Order as hereinafter set forth? NX, TfiEREi'OW, BE IT PMMVM NT 2f11r C0MW5SI01 OF = C17T OF MIAMI, rLM DA! Section 1. The Findings of Fact and ConCluslona of Lsw art made with respect to the Project as described in the Increment I Development Order for the Southeast Overtow v'Park Most Community Padewlopmtnt Area, which is attached hereto as Exhibit W and made a part hereof by reference, and is applicable to an area of the City of Mimi designated in 1112 by Resolution No. 81-?SS , as the Southeast Overtow V?ark West Comaatnity Redevelopment Area, as more particularly described in Exhibit W. Section 2. The Increment I Development Order for the Southeast Overtawn/Park West Community Redevelapnsent Area, (Exhibit W), is hereby granted and Issued. Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorised and directed to Lamdiately send certified capita of this Resolution together with Exhibit W and capita of all exhibits, attachments, and written materials, including portions of ordinances referenced in the text of the Increment I Development Order to., The Florida Department of Community Affairs, 2571 Executive Center Circle East, Tallahassee, Florida, 323011 and Zht South Florida Regional Planning Council, 3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 140, Rollywood, Florida, 33021. Section s. The City Manager is hereby direRed to take all actions necessary to fulfill the City's obligations under the terms of the Increment I Development Order for the Southeast Overta n/Park West Cawrmity Redevelopment Area (Exhibit W). -2- Wi-J11 s'S-390 1 9ee'son S. to the event that OW Mnion or section of this Resolution at the increment I Owelopmnt Order for the Southeast Orertauh/Paeis MW cdwanity Redevelopeent Area (dthibtt *A•) is detemined to bi imaliA. 111#941, or untwatitutianal by a court or a9eney of oonpatent jurisdiction. such decision shall in no rimer affect the remaining portions of this Resolution or the Increment I Development Order for the Southeast Orertern ?ark nest COW"nity Redevelapeent Aria (Inhibit •A•), uhisA shall Lftin in full force one effect. PASM NO ADM= this filth day of � tsbruary 1fH. A1RiR's NINU i CITY =Nt PWARm NO APPOMM Us Wel �,; 1 i�i• �.I E. NAiMT APPFOM AS 70 FM AND ao R ss 4UPCIA A. CIT! Pa lal JS1VS/ap�M2se -} �g-3�0 �OtetT 'A' I1�1!leMr I DaVYQ1e1! OA/1 RARE OT DF#lzxw gr! ?he Southeast OrertowvRark lost achonity Redevelopment Area RM! 0P DN)RQ011 Itme City of Rismi ' Ai111 ON= AGM Q MVUOM- Rerbert R. sailer, Assistant City nsnnW and Sergio Radriques. Director, City of Miami PIMM04 Daps1tasnt. or their suecessors. Planer DCKNPTT'O)1I It* Project consists of develapsent in the Southeast Overtowv?ark host Casarnity ReOevelep m, Area through the Tor 2007, including the folloring lard uses and irherseantar Land uses Increment I Increment II Incrount III Totals (19WIM) (1991-IM) (1"9-2007) Office Woes square feet) 166.000 205,000 632.5O0 11003,500 Retail/Service/Ceneral Caswercial (gross square feet) K.200 37,300 90,600 196,I00 Motel (room) 0 S00 Go 1,100 Residential (dwelling units) 2,000 2,000 51000 9.000 Convention (grass square feet) 290.000 310,000 0 6001000 Pursoant to F.S. 350.06(22) (1"7), the "wt specifies the total amount of develapshsrht planrhed for each lard use category, but peovides flasibility for such developmsrhI to be located anyuhare within the Project Area, subject to local lard dsralopssnI regulations. The ProjaR Area includes all poop mty within the boundaries of the southeast overtowvvark most Ossunity Rsdevelapseeht Area# designated in 1982 by City oaasission Resolution no. 82- 75S, as illustrated on the map in 6hdhibit 1 and described in Odhibit 2 attached hereto. The Project Area contains a total of approximately 209 acres Of lard. tabu. 0OMPrIOM cr STATIC? PIOPWYt see Gdhibit 2. 1 ��-390 I :*T2GTI,W: Fbr the purposes of this Development Order, the follewirg terns "ll be defined as foLlVAe A0R or Application for Developmet AWrvval, 4he original Appl�tataon for Devdap"M Apprwsl for DareR,o n Mimi filed by the City of Miami on Flruary e, i967, pursuant to F.S. 380.0e (1987). CMA or Oorsolidsted Application tar DW*LgP et AACCUMle Tho revised Am prepared pursuant to paragraph 16 on page 13 _ herein. 1 certificate of Occ4pancyt A pWWWW t car teWorary and/or partial Certificate of xeuparcy issued, pursuant to Section 307 of the south Florida Building Cbde, for any 'Net New Development" as defined hareun. City: 11he City of Miami. Florida. Courcil: The South Florida Regional Planting Couneil. =MI :he Metropolitan Dade county DePartmett of Enviirenedntal Rasourees Management. DII: L velopmert of Regional L:gnact. DovaloprAnt Craditse Zhe individual units of lard vow included within Zbtal Alla ablo Devalopeent, as massured by square footags or nsetw of dwelling %ruts, hotel roans, or seats. FUR: the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation. Major we Spacial Pansit: A special panit issued by the City Oaaiseion pursuant to Ordinance 9SUD. the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami. as amended. Net New Developmerte Any construction or reconstruction u,hidn will result in a net increase, within any 'Parcel of Lad•, of residential dwelling units, hotel roars. seats in attractions/recreation facilities or gross square footage for office, goverment office, retail/service, convention. wholmale/ industrial or institutional uses. Land uses to be renoved by demolition of a building or stricture my be edited against the proposed rnsv :and uses for purposes of calculating the not increase. if the Planning 2 10 -111 �S-3qn DLrector detemLns that there vti a valid Csrtificatt of Oorupnty salatiny an the affertive date of this LNW6 09104M Order for the land user to be daoliahed. If a ct"t of land use L proprsad, the Planning Digamm may credit the prior lard use, against the proposed land use based ►pen equivslo* upsets as measured by peak hour vehicle trip generation. Any activity u uch has an the effective date of this Devalopm* Order a valid bolding pesnit or any currently effective development order shall not be included ,s Iset New Developea t. 'fie Planning Director my seclude frnn Net Mew Develgpme any small developsent under 10,0u0 sgusrt feet in floor arm, if he finds that such devalapaent would have no requysl ispact as nma% rid by peek hour vehicle trips. Parcel of Lnde Any quantity of land capable of being described with sudh deflnitenss that its location and bourdari• may be established. and vhidt is ds►gnstad by its owner or developer as land to be used or developed as a unit or 4iLd% has been used or devalopd u a unit. Projects 'fiat Projavt described in the -PNwwr msmPriar on irge i harsh - ass The arm included within the legal dseription in Exhibit 2. r ear• ed by 1-395, I-95, N. Sth Street and Biscayne Blvd.) .btal Allowable Devalopnentf The quantity of Net New Development far %#ddu Certificates of Oocupuxy may be issued under the tense and aarditions of this Development Order. together with the applicable Muter Dsvelcpw* Order, as my be ==fid purwuart to F.S. 380.06(19) UW7), and %hick shall be measured by the following land uses e Office 166,000 groan square fast RetaL13MVice 66,200 grow square fast Residential 2000D dialling units Convention 290.WO grows square feet ,he City my Permit simultaneous incsaass and decreases in the above ddealbed land use categories, provided that the regional im actt of the land user a• d+angad will rot exceed the adverse regional LV&cu of the lard uses in In=ww. I of the Project as originally approved. as measured by total peak hour vehicle trip. S"JUL 'S_390 FIMU ii CW FIC: s '.Test folla►u+q findings of fact are hergr estfiteel aid adopRes with respect to the Projects A. Rse iindui s aitd dsteeusinstiona of Boot act forth in the recitals of the resolution to this Develapsart order are hereby meffased. ' S. 'Dee real peopaty sdsids is the steject of this DsveLapraet order is legally described in tshibit 2. C. Cie city of Mum filed the AM with the City, the Oxr=l. and the Florida Depaitnet of oeanity Affairs. D. Zhe 0" has been filed by the City of Mimi pursuant to T.S. M.06(22) (1967) authorizing the City of Mimi to apply far dereLapnet approval and rsreive a develop ss* crJ r for any or all of the area within its guru daetion. Individual developsmtts are not identified or repAred to be Wams.fied in the 0U A. E. The purlast of the 0M is to identify and assess proboble regional ugpsats and to obtain appr..•al :.:t -U;A awAe rm,a..d.wL ass accordance with the general guidelines act forth in this Dsvetopasra Order and Use 0WL llse coeteept is to reaogeise the Project Arm as a single area of high intasesty dsysigneit and to focus the MI review process primarily an the uWacts that Tbtal Allowable Develapaet within the arm will have an land, water, traerpattation. environaeftal. aawrsity service, energy and other resources aid systesr of regional si,gnifioums. the CUR soda a single MI review , 9 - far Overall Phased davalquMl of the 9otabmst 0vsrtorWlbrk Meat mssanity Redevelopment Arm rather than re*dzing oasis individual OBI saeile dsvelapeent within the danstown arm to fits for separate MU review. f . Dwrelapsaet within the Project Arm is mptld to matures to be aconiplishd over an mterdd period of Limn by a variety of developers. WhU t say include the City. Ime developers my respond to sorlut demand and tes:hnolagis that can only be estb ated In the C DA. The 01GA ie intended to sew as a flexible guide to planned develgset of the Project Arm rather tlsan a precise blueprint far its dwralopse t. 2 9"11 Tarefore, pursuant to F.S. 360.06(21) (bi (1967), the CAM servos Metz devalopnett approval for three increments of develcgset over a period of approximtely twenty you and specific develogamt approval for :nrrenent I. whidn is the first phase of development peojieted for a period of approxinstaly five years. 9Ub*s* et incseaertal applications my need to be adjusted to onwe nearly serve as a living gnude reoognisarq the evolution of n rkst doom%] and tadv lies. G. 'fie Project Are mnuins a tow of appraRiately 209 arse. The CAM propose Net MAW Devalopnet within the Project Urea for the land use, quantities and phase definad herein as IM&L Allonnble Developea t. M. The Project is not located in an, are of critical state oonesm as designated pursuant to F.S. 360 (1967). A canprsha eLve review of the probable mutts that will be geueratsd by Increment I of the Project has been aorductd by various City deponents, as reflected in the all . and the South Florida Regional Planning 0--.U=l staff. J. 'lh&s Development ord`r is consistent with the report and reasadaticne of the South Florida Regional Planning oxmil, entitled 'Developssrt of Regional Inn}act AssessrA nt for the Southseat OvatasV Park Met Omesauty Redevelopment Ara - Inasmat I', dated Jarrary 4, 190. the South llarida Ryionsl Planning Oouncil re000sude approval of Inc resent I of the Project, and all conditions to whirl► sudh approval is subject are reflected herein. K. Increment I of the Proojet is consistent with the applicable portion of the State lard development plan and the Rggioral Plan for South Florida. L. increesnt I of the Project is in confocsity with the adopted Musa Ctaprehe»ive Neighborhood Plan. M. Irazeant I of the Rojas is in a000rd with the district mung classification of Zoning ordinance 95W. se seeded. N. Incre wnt I of the ProjW will have a favorable icPact on the e=x y of the City. P. Irrreoert I of the Project will efficiently use public transportation facilities. G. Inereamet I of the Project will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing ressorsbly accessible to their place of employment. 5 8111 "s-3.90 R. lncrownt : of the Project will efficiently Use nacessery public facilities. S. Imremnt I of the Project will include ads"te mitigative Oessures to &sour* that it will not adversely effect the enriranoet and natural rsmxmm*s of the City. T. Increment I of the Project will nbt adversely affect living ow iticea an the City. U. Increment I of the Project will not adversely affect public safety. V. Iber* is a public need for Increment I of the Project. CCHCUXIOM OF Ws 'Mot. having made the findings of fact contained above. the City mmmaesion hereby amcludem as a matter of law, the followings R. 1he City of Maaeu acting so a "dowrtwn development authority" as defined an F.S. 3AU (1967). and is authorized by F.S. 300 (19M7) to mice application for development approval and receive a devalquent order. d. Inctemant I Of the Project complies with the Niawi mgrehansive Neighborhood Plan, as consistent with the orderly development and goals of tn* City of Mira&, and complies with local lard developosit regulat ions . C. Increment I of the Project does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State lard developsent plan applacrble to the City of Mnami and the Regional Plan for South Florads. D. Increment I of the Project is consistent with the report and rememendationa of the South Florida Regional Planning Courcil and does not unressorably interfere with any of the con uderatiana and objectives set forth in F.S. 36U (1967). E. Qnorges in Increment I Of the Project rhidn do not emceed the 7 t+l Allowable Development or whim► do not result in a net reduction of more than S Percent in total &=mge maned and developed as City parks, shall not Im-titute a substantial deviation under F.S. 300 (1907). 6 8"11 AC::11 TMQN: Ttat, hmviny mods the findings of fact and resdwd the Mclu miens of later cast forth above, it is ordered that Incrrmaht I of the Roject f! hlby approvd, sub)Wt to the follwa n am"tionrt IM CITY, i7S SUa3ASM, AWaR AWIMS JOMZ fat WVWAUX MAY IMS MnWLM FBOUIS AND QWIFICkM tar O=APAMLY FOR WIAL IMAOMM LINUOPOW1. PJVAR AW 70 M ? M6 Alfa CClOMCM OP 'M?i 1iV M§W 1MGr,M a WM TS ArrDe 1c 1iAJU DiNIMAWMW CAW AND 1NAiLh I. ha*=e ail development pursuant to this Developsat Order to be in accordance with applicable building cods, land developme* regulations. osdinancs and other law. 2. Fax the pueposs of lase -line data collection, mnduct air quality sautaring for au%m monmcide (CO) concentrations based an the folly ,LM reguiraaents h a. CD momtoring data shall be pewidd for the Project arm at one loostior.. b. The monitoring shall consist of four (4) -Wo of data collection during the winter months, November 15th thuiough March 15th. C. the monitoring shall be Completed prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy within that location for the first development under this Devalopserlt Order % hich sssta LW percent of the presumptive thrmhold for Developments at Regional impact pursuant to Rule 27F, F.A.C., within that sub-acmr or prior th March 15. M. whichever comme first. d. Me mnnitac will be located at the presumed umst ass intersection for the developowt area. Mw locstim will be selected jointly by the City. Florida Dgpactawnt of Dwitannental Rardstion (F=), Dade County Dwirorns tal Resources Maeagsett (CM) 0 and Council staff. 7 q9-390 e. ptfam the monitoring required by 2a. and 2b. above as prowibed by the policies and rapdatians 910M" M M and malt final air quality monitoring repots to felt, UM. and the Gmmil staff within 60 days of the mipltion of the mauitorinq. 7. mnduet air quality madding of carbon monoaide impacts to dtermua whist, if any, dangea are naedd in air quality monitoring, including the nand to anmtimn monitoring. 'sue modeling doll be aompleled within am year after the base -line dots monitoring has been ea43eted Priam to paragraph 2 above and the iltarse UMM maw barn selected pum7uant to 76. below.. The air quality modeling shall fallow fM'uidelinm and *wall a. as limited to ro more than five (S) intersections to be eateeted from among the intersections projected in the atdl to operate at level of service E or F. - !fie intamactiow shall be seleRsd jointly by FDOt. mm, the aousncil staff, and the City. b. Be subsittd in a detailed and oagrduensive air quality analysis to FM and DM. for aaaa4m and review, and to the Owns! staff and the City for review and approval. C. InclWo 1 11a sad duangea to ass quality monitoring as justified by the air quality madding analysis. 4. If the results of Uto air quality modeling study. s• dmeribed in paragraph 3 above, are acre than 85 percent but lose than 100 percent of the !fate standards far CO aoncsatrations, isglemss an air quality monitoring and abstemu* program iblloving approval of the repot purmuut to 3b above. The monitoring and abatement pccgn a, inchwum a time !raw for implaw nation. must be approved by the Council staff and the City wbsequant to review and mass by FM and UML Vw program my include. but is not limited to, the following tsdatiquesn a. Physical planning messuras (e.g. sign! satian, parking arm Location. addition of turn lanes, tc.). b. The aorRum nce of monitoring. 8 9"11 • 0 5. :f the results of the air quality snde"M Rudy, as desQibed an mrdLtion 3 &trove. eased State Standards for OD own¢ertrStiana, de one Of the followings s. PrOvsde smq*Able d cwg atum sbid► clearly indicates that m eaeedences will not occur, or that the Net New DsvelgsMt SSdL ng appevval will fat aontribste to the predLtled CD violation. or that any potential OD edditionr for 04 Mat New DeveLopaert have been or will be mitiymted (a000rdinq to ONSWil staff and the city subma*w t to review end eowt by PDM and MR) prior to issuance of building petaita for the particular Nat New Development. sue+ doowRation my include a .odelirq study whidt incorporates m ures ad► am those contained in Oxidition da., and b.. above. I%is doeumertation Must be approved by the ammil staff and the City submequent to review and aowt by MM and uoa. b. withhold the issuance of any building Pamtts for Net New Development within the Sub -arm that shots CD esceederces. 6. safare the earlimr slate of a. or b. specified balms a. Post years after the effective data of the Development Order, or b. 'ihe date of issuance of certificates of oocgmlcy for sr:e than 1.600 residential Anita, complete the construction of four -lane widening of N.M. lot Avenue tram N.M. 2nd Street to N.M. loth Suet. 7. Withhold the issuance of building permits for Net New Development if the city has been dettnained to be in norm plianee with paragraph 6 above. b. Make efforts to work closely with applicable govervowmaAl agencies to ansure that the Metraarer Stage II herein be completed as identified in the current Metropolitan Planning Orgsnization's 'rianspactation I provement Program (TIP) published in June. 1907. In the event that by Decent 31. 1992. the Mtromover Stage II improvements are not Substantially under czatruction. an dtaedimd by council staff. than this situation will be considered a substantial deviation hma the 9 9111 "9_390 rutigstive efforts anticipated to offset the adverse inpeCts of '1ou Allowable Developnet. In this event, the Appliart shall be required to undergo additional Devalopment of Regional Lnpatt review for trarrportaticn anpacts purauant to F.S. 38D.06(19)(a)(g) and (h), (19a16). Such additional Developleent of Regional aspect review, of required, shall be initiated by March 31, 1993. Mst New DevelapMBRi %&►dole have dftained building praits Prior to Derabdr 31, 1"2 *011 roe be affacted by any smbampea[ review. 9. mve the suuwrity to saaw aevelopment for its popnstiamte rare of the mw of imWrcwmerrta and/or services necessary to monitor and/or mitigate any adverse igncta. The city •all also have authority to assess development its Prvporticmts spars of the meta attributable to prgw&ticn of the neater plan. the Application for Development Appmral. and this Development Order. Y well as the future Costs Of reviewing indivldmel development applicaticra, mmxuUwirg cOWlianoe with this Development Order, and any Other wets reasonably related to the administration and saplemeftation of this DeveUpmet order. "If necessary, the City shall establish a proeduae for rebating any funds collected in eacuas of those fords attrilnus-bls to a particular devalopaent and necwary to implement this Development Order cc any orauwwe or procedure recuired to mmitor and enforce aapliance with this Development Order and to siitigate the ingacts of Total Allowable Developnent . " 10. matabliah Decedmv 31..1"3 as the date until utUch the City agrees that Na grantees of buildinq peraits or Major Use 1peeial Paits for new development, under the Southeast OvataueVftrk West Cammu pity Ildevelolaet - Increment I Develapaet of hAgio al boot shall not be subject to dowwirrsaning, unit density redaction. cc intensity reduction to the mtem of the amount of developmet included within the building permit or Major Use Special Permit, unlw the City can demonstrate that 10 • 89-ili sub Mial dhutgex in the aorditionm underlying the approval of the devalalrset order have oonarsd, cr that the dsvelopnmt order wss based on ftew antially inaccurate adf rm@tion Feavidd by the Applicant, at U-At the change is clearly sasMial to the pbdic haslth, safety or welfare. 1fMa7mon. Nwam2w. AD �r I 11. the City Mall monitor the capacity of Total Allonbls "apaent by reserving the eamm of Developmet Ctedib nacssrary for Met New Development at a time, to be determined by the CLty, prior to or coincides with ap woval of a building permit ar Major Use 1pecial permit. the City shall place reaww"Is time limits an all building persists and ra jor Use 8pscial ?meats to isms that construction prop ese• within a reasonable period of time after approval to prevent stockpiling of rservations for Development Credits. The time period established by the City @hall take into aeeout the size of the proposed Net New Devalopm M in relationship to the time necessity to begin co mtruction. 11. lion the issuance of a Certificate of occupancy for any Net New Dsvalopnent, the City @hall sake appropriate subtractions from the mKxm of Total Allocable Loevelopmet urdr this Development order. No Certificate of Occupancy stall be issued for Nat New Development which would. in the &Wept*, exceed the mount of 4Otal Allowable Davalopsant under this Development Order. 13. The City call integrate all original and r%Wlemsntal ADA infcrsetion into a Consolidated Application for DsveL WWM Approval (CIM) and subanit two copies of the O" to the CaRvil, one aw to the Clty Clark, and one copy to the Florida Departsma of Om aerity Affairs within thirty (30) days of the effective data of this Devalopmet order. 'inns CRM shall be prepared as follower a. When@ hey. clarified. or revised reformation was prepard subssquert to submittal of the AM but prior to iasu ince of this Development order, whether in response to a factual statemet of 11 9". 11 infaMtion needed or at?havoo, the caiginal pages of the ADA will be replaced with revised )ages- b. Revised pages viil lave a 'Page Maher (R) - Date' nntatian. with •Page pumber' beiiq the nUdW of the original page. ' W e indicating that the page was revised. and Cate' stating the date of the revision. i 14. jh* merolideted Application far Dlvelal G* APPCW#sl is in oorFumtd herein by reference and will be relied spas by the parties in disdnargirq their statutory deli• under F. s. 390 (1997) . and 10ca1 ordinances. 9&atW* al ompliann with the factual represatatis=r contained in the amimlidsted Application for Developmem Approval is a condition for approval unless moved or nsadified by aWeementi asnr I the ammil. City. and Applicant. its successors. and/or assigns. 15. "U tangs. propoea", suggestions ud procedures proposed in the Application for uevelopaefnt Approval# but rot specifically inaorlmatd in this Devololmennt Order, shall not be considered a part of the Consolidated Applicution for Development Approval insofar as they my have been deem d to place a reyuiresa& on the City of Miami to take any action car abstain fray taking anY action. Ihs tees of this Developsse+st Order sisall — trol and any reyuiresafts of the City are specifically enumeratd herein. 16. The City shall prepare an annal report and outwit copies to the ODu =I. the City Clerk and Florida Department of OpaM=sitY Aff"M an or before cads amiversary date of this Developwnt Order. The anrnml rsport for Dm aloAj !~ismi - Increment I tint also be incorporated into the annual rgpost rs*dxed in the Southesst OvatmWftrk West Gmmffkity Redevelgsat Muter Devalopswa Order so that a single antral report is compiled for the entire project. The annual report shall include. at a rsinimmms is. A cmWlete response to tadn quastion in Ednibit 3. b. Identification and description of any knarn charges in the plan of oevelopmra, or in the representations ozaaind in the CKL A. or in the phasing for the reporting Year and for the neat year. 12 FM-ii i 0 C. A sjsmary 02gwL&m of 7bN1 Allemble Dsvekapmt and Net Noy Dsvalgpwt proposed aid actually &Wvvd &Zug the year, including loatiarm. acrt9e, egkare MotAge, Halls of, units, and other unats of lard usee included within 7 tal Allaable D«ala{94M. and the acreage Maned and developed as city puke. d. An aeaaMammt of the Applicant's and the City's ao•pl*um with the a ditions of approval cc-t&.ined in this Developmt Order and the oom•itm mA %hid+ are om*Ained in the AppiicatUm for Developnnt Approval and %hich have been ideltified by the City, the OmAncil, or the Dgartavt of mite Afflaim ON bairq significant. e. Sp%eifiation of my amended = application far deveU*Nmvt approval or requests for a sAbetartial dw►istian dtmuLmtion that were filed m the rapatinq year ar to be filed during the nest year. f. An urdication of chugs, if any. 1n City jurisdaction tar any portion of the dsvelapwm since iaeusnca of this Development order. g. A statassrt that all person hove been sent oopism of the annual raport in onnfasance with F.S. 8A0.06 (19) (1967). h. A Dopy of any recorded notice of the adoption of this DWSLopKrc order or any subsequent mcdificatim that use reoasdd by the Applicant pummm to P.S. W.06(15) (1987). 1. Any other udmatiot required by the Dq tmM of G=Ld ity Affairs (=) in acawdance with F.S. 30.06 (18)(1907). 17. .he dgedlin far mmwcmq cry dsvelopsvk shall be two (2) yaws tram the effective date of this Dsvelcpm* order. The tterination date for asipltirq devalopmat •hall be December 31, 1992, provided that the Applicant, cw its euaeesaors and assigns, complies with paragraph 25 harem. The temmiration data my only be modified 3n accordance with F.S. AM-06(19)(c) (1967). 13 8111 is 19. I he effactive data of this Develapueorder dhall be 4S days flvm its trarwuttal to the Florads Deanne* of unity Affairs, axv=l, and Applicant: provided. however, that if this xvelolsent Order is appealed, the effective date will not start until the day after all appeals have been withdrawn or resolved pursuant to F.S. JW.07(2) i 1 he City shall rot violate any of the axsAitiom of this Devalgaent order or otherwise fail to act in sbstMftW araPllance with this Developeert Order or paufit any prvpaty maser within the bouderies covered by this Development order to violate any of the provisions of this Development Order. In the evert any entity acne rolled by the Applicant ard/or the City or any pawhittee or landowner of any Parcel of :and violates (hereinafter "violator') the provisions of this oevelopnent Order, the city shall stay the affertaveness of this Development Order as to the Parcel of land in hfhidh the vuolatave activity or conduct has occurred and withhold further permits, approvals, and services for developsert in said Parcel of land upon pse"ge, of any appicpriate resolution by the City, adopted in accordance with this section, finding that such violation has occurred. the violator will be given written notice by the City that statesa 1) the nature of the purported violation, and 2) that unless the violation is cured within 30 days of said notice, the City will hold a public hearing to consider the matter within 60 days of the date of said notice. In the evert the violation is not curable in 40 days• the violator's diligent good faith efforts. as datermined by the City, to cuss the violation within that period will obviate the need to hold a public Miring and this D:.•alopseht Order will remain in full fforce and affect unless the violator does not diligently pursue the curative action to ompletaon within a reasonable tiase, in h.hicn wren the City will give 15 days notice to the violator of its inntentim to stay the etfactivaness of this Development Order and withhold further posits, approvals, and services to the Parcel of Lad in rhidh the violation has occurred and until the violation is curd. The tau of this p wagraph 14 98-111 `-Ng-390 my be mMified free time to time by %rattan 6000"t by the M%. the city, and a3ucal staff, to enable the City to "area the tags of this Dareloeeant order to the fullest halt. vRile providing due procew to all developers urdar this DevelopmIt order. 2G. 2he Director of the Southeast Ov4rtarNPark west Project in conjunction with the Planning Director, is herby designates to amitar cospuliance with all Condition of this Lwesi nsa Order and *all hav, the duty and authority to interpret the provisions of this Dw►algs cat Girder and to promulgate rulings, requlatie s and procedtiras nammmary to isgulasst at. provided the sow are not insasistent with the tares harao[ ar of F.S. 380 (1987). a• duly prvulgated and adopted rules thereunder. Appeals to decisions of the Planning Director my be filed pursuant to procedures not forth in Article 30 of ordinance 9500, the tcnirq Ordinance of the City of ltiawi, Florida. as aeanded. Any nonamog"ance Mall be subject to the provision of paragraph 22 herein. 21. :he South Florida Regional Planning Council raport and reommaodation, entitled "LWalopsant of Regional Impact Asseseastt far the Southeast uvert*aV Park Want Osnity Rdevelopmt Area- Increwit I . dated January 4, 1966. is incorporated herein by raferancs. 21. Within i0 days of the effective date of this Development order, it atall be rsoordd with the Clerk. Lade County Circuit Cbut, pursuant to F.S. AW.Ge(15) (1967), specifying that the Development Order rues with the lard and is binding cn the Applicant, its successors. and/or assigns, jointly or severally. 23. 'the esastance of this Development Order *all not act to limit ar w m crib* the rights of any person under F.S. 360 (1967) to file an ApPlication for Development Approval ace rbtain an individual devoloPet order far property awered by this Develops* Order, not withstanding the sustenee of this Developent Order. In the am* that suds an individual davelopamit order is apprwd and beao•es affective, the individual developeant order - *all control development of the property covered by the individual development arder and the tees and 15 "!9-39Q Conditions of this Devalopment Order *011 ro larger be binnduq Upon the proper y. Any such individual devalaprat orders shall, by thew tars, be arsistmm with the objectives and mrditions of this Dlvelopiaut order. 24. 2Ai9 uevelope* Order doll not reprl, nor aaad in any My, any other on.4 tly effective devalopm* order or building pawtt within tho "Jett are previously issued by the City 03mussion pum" to F.S. 1SO (1967) . 1%is Devak pment Order shall not create nor authorise the Creation ar imposition of any additional requiremnents or restrictions. with respect to any present or futiure develape t under any currently effective Development Order or building permit issued prior hereto. Notwithstanding this puvgra;h, the City shall om*mus to have %tatever authority pursuant to law it nsy now hsvw Cr say acquire in the future (other than by virtue of this Development Order). 25. 'fins Developmehc Order @hall rot Create nor impose any additional requirements or restrictions 4pca the City with respect to its powers to watt fact Zww as .wesiomm ordarances an Cevelopmnant, including Net Now Development minder this Development Order and future dewalolaat of the City, as such inpact fees or asaseaaants my be authorised by law. 2b. In the event that a substantial deviation is determined under the terns of this Development Order or F.S. 380 (1907). the City shell retain its ability to issue bualdmq permits and Ma jar We Special Permits and shall continue to do so unabated, subject to the is and conditions of this Developant Order. 27. In the caret that this Dsvelcp ma Order is subject to litigation uherein an in junnctum is issued staying the adweeme t of this Development Order. the City shall either. under this Development Order or Cider the powers granted it by state law, be pe nsitted to continue to issue building permits. Major Use Special Permits and Certificates of OCcugancy until such tins as a final remolutum of the litigation occurs. 16 W-11LI• nag-34o 0 W UOL �Pr= ar NULgW 111 4 i n Mani MI+ at a point at the i awseetiae of as eMar Lim of 04. Sth "rear thence ce Wert or the ceect lino of M.N. Sth Kraft (wd M.N. Sth •fret) to the mat WW line of I-" to the mouth KU lira of I.JOS to the caner line of aismyna bulawwdr thence southerly on the cancan lire of aisayne aoulewrd to the point of bepiming. 'fie abwe described arm omuim apraiaately 209 acres. 17 W-111 �q-3q0 v 2 SOUTHEAST OVERTOW DOWMTOWM NIANU _ e DUUNOARY MAP OUTHEAST OVERTOWN / PARK Waal - ill& metrrt" of enact pibwatr� beta at a paint at the istereat/a at the ewer lift of 8.2. St% Strat= theses wet go the testae 1lM of 8.9. St% Street (md •.r. Ste Street) to the east UM lise of t•SS to the east% SM Has of 1•M to the tooter line of bsearas SoelevaNs t%ooss aset%srly as the aster live of Sisesrse boulevard to the polar of heµssisy. The Above described area testate spreslsstelf 209 atoa. so- Ill 'nS-3q0 ►+w State of Florida De►artseat of Community Affairs BLt�ll•07•sS bureau of load end Water 11884116e06t 2511 ttteutive Center Circle, lost Tallahassee. Florida 32101-8266 (904) 410-4925 Sebeeetlen 150.06(16), Florida statutes. places the res►ossiblllty on the developer of as approved Devele►sest of 9*690041 Impact (011) for subsittlss as weasel report to the local govetamosc. the Regional Flossie@ Cousell the lo►ertsest of Cesevelty Affairs, sad to all affected permit sleseloo, es the date specified to the Develo►eout Order. The failure of a developer to submit the report so the date specified to the develo►meat order say result lit the temporary sesposeloe of the development order by the local geveremoot astil the *easel report to submitted to the review ageseiss. This requlrseeot applies to all Developments of Rollosel Impact shish have boas approved since August 6. 1900. It you 'have say Questiess about this required report. call the 0R1 Befereomest Coerdlester at. (904) 616•4925. Flags* send the original completed assuml report to the designated local government official stated in the development with (1) copy to each of the followtegs a) The regional planning &gooey of jurelditles) b) All affected perslttleg ageseteel c) Division of Resource plameimg sad Momagemost Bureau of Laud and Water Masagenest 2571 Executive Center Circle. Best Tallahassee. Florida 32301 Fleas* format your Annual Status Report after the forest oeas►la provided below. ANNUAL STATUS llpORT &*parties periods to Meath Day Tesr ostb of oar Dov*lopoests Yana of Dal Locatless City County Dev*lopers Names Compeer Mes@ Add fees I Street Location City. State. S&P Code 88-111 s' 9-390 pop SLUR-0?-SS t) Describe say changes *@do is the proposed PIGS of develepeeat, phasing. at in the teptes*Stotless semtalsed to the Applieatto m for Development Approval @lsea the "gel poset at aegiesal impact received approval. Please Note so; settees (eebetestiel determination@) takes by local governmest to address these changes. note: If a response is to be more them ooe o*ateseo. attach as Ishiblt 'A' a detailed deseriptlom of Saab choose Sad copies of the modified Site PISS drawings. tebiblt 'A' should ale* address the fallowing additional items it'appliea►le. a) Describe changes is the pion of development or phasing for the reporting year sad ter the suboequest years; b) State any known iscromestal sit applications for developsest approval or rggwe@ts for a substastial dovlettee daterstsatles that were filed In the reporting year sod to be filed duties the sent year; e) Attach a ropy of any Notice of the adopties of a development order or the @ubooqeoet oodltleatloa of an adopted development order that was recorded by the developer purewoat to Subsection 350.06(14)(d), P.S. 71 Use t►:r: tzar. a choose is local geverseest lurtedlectom for soy portion of the developeost @late the development order was Issued? It so. boo the sessalaa local government adopted a saw Development of gegiesel Impact development order for the projeetf fledge provide a copy of the order adopted by the sssesisg local goveremogt. 7) Provide copies of say revised waster pleas, iseresestal site pleas, etc.. not Previously submitted. Note: If a r*@Pesae fa to be were them *so Sr two sentences. attach as Inhibit 'S'. a) Provide a $memory comparison of developeast activity proposed add actually conducted for the repartleg year. trample: Number of dwelliea wait@ constructed. site isprovesoets. lots sold. acres stood, areas floor area constructed. barrel of storage tapeeity coaplatod. Permits obtala*d. etc. (tote: It a re@PeSae to to be more them See oogt@mee, attach as tahlbit 'C'. S) gave soy Undeveloped tracts of load Is the development (ocher than individual almslo-tselly lots) boom sold to a s*Psrste socity or developer? It so. identity tract, its also. and the buyer. Please provide maps which show the tracts involved. tract Rujor 8 "vi 11 "9_3.90 Note: tt a roopeass is to ►e safe them one sesteses, attach as tahl►it '0'. 6) Deseri►e amy load*• purchased or optiesed adjaeest to the orisisal Development of 11661*e41 impact site su►sequent to tsoss"ce of the d*volopaesc order. taostity such load, its ale*. and intended use on a site plea sad esp. Note: If a response to ►e aore them one fastest*. attach to tshi►it 't'. 1) List any su►stantial local. •tat*. sea federal ►ermits which have ►ten o►tained, S►p11od far. or dsslsd. duttag this re►ortins period. Specify the agency. typo Of permit. Sod duty for each. Veto: It a response is to ►e note that cue .•stases, attach at Exhibit 'V. S) Assess the development's sad local government's continuing com►liance with any cosditiose of approval cestal"ed in the Ott development order. Note: Attach as tshi►it 'C'. (see attached term) !) provide any information that 1s specifically rewired ►y the Development Order to ►e t"tlwded In the casual repott. 10) provide a acacemesc certifylag that all persome have ►oon soot copies of the aatual report is eostermasee with Su►soeciool 250.06(14) and (16). ►.S. ►free" completing the questionnaire$ Titles asproaestlags 99-111 4?9-34t; SUMMON ION DOCUNUTI HAM VSE SPECSAL PTf442T SOVTMlA$T OVERTOWN/PAM NEST CO MNZTY PNWBCT SISCAymn VIEK APARTKUTS 4�9_3g0. 0 V IWOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SOpTNER84 OVERTOM1a / PARK WEST COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Block 24, Biscayne View Apartments, 915 NW lot Avenue 2802.2.1. General Report: 1. The City of Miami presently owns all of Block 24 and has selected Cruz Development Corporation in accordance with Resolution No. 85-393 to develop Block 24. City Commission Resolution No. 87-141 approved the Land Disposition Agreement with Cruz Development Corporation for the actual development of Biscayne View Apartments on Block 24.( see attached resolutions) 2. See 1. as above. J. Two copies of the Certified Survey of Block 24, as prepared by Schwebke-Shiskin & Associates are attached. 4. See appropriate attachment extracted from the Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI and survey. 5. See appropriate attachment extracted from the Southeast Overtown/ Park West DRI . 6. See appropriate attachment extracted from the Southeast Overtown/ Park West DRI . 2802.2.2. Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan a. See attached "Park west/Overtown Block 24 Design Concept" as prepared by Stull and Lee, Architects and Planners, and also see attached selected plans and construction documents. b. See a. above C. See a. above 2802.2.3. Developmental Impact Study - See attached summary prepared by the South Florida Regional Planning Council 2304.2 Application form: the attached form will be resubmitted with the signature of the City Manager as soon as possible. 09-3.90 9 Ok Major Use Special Permit Biscayne View Apartments - page two 1. See attached 2. Copies of deeds to be provided, see attached Acquisition Breakdown. 3. See attached to be provided by the Planning Department 4. a. and b. See appropriate attachment extracted from the Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI. S. See appropriate attachment extracted from the Southeast Overtown% Park West DRI. 6. a. See attached plans from Rodriguez, Khuly, Quiroga. b. See appropriate attachment extracted from the Southeast Overtownj Park West DRI. c. See attached "Park West/Overtown Block 24 Design Ccnc:ept" as prepared by Stull and Lee, Architects and Planners, and also see attached selected plans and construction documents. The plans are consistent with the S. P. I. 16 Zoning Ordinance. 7. See attached DR! Summary prepared by the South Florida Regional Planning Council 2304.2.1. a. The City of Miami presently owns all of Block -24 and has selected Cruz Development Corporation in accordance with Resolution 85-393 to develop Parcel 24. City Commission 87-141 approved the Land Disposition Agreement with Cruz Development Corporation for the actual development of Biscayne View Apartments on Block 24.( see attached resolutions) b. A development containing 463 residential units and 20,000 square feet of commercial space. The development also contains a parking garage for approximately 467 vehicles and various recreational and service amenities, with the commercial frontage on the 9th Street Mall. C. See appropriate attachment extracted from the Southeast Overtown/Park West DRI. d. See attached plans from Rodriguez, Khuly, Quiroga. e. See attached plans Rodriguez, Khuly, Quiroga. 9 0 Major Us* Special Permit Biscayne View Apartments - page three f. See attached plans Rodriguez, Khuly, Quiroga. g. Not applicable. h. See attached plans Rodriguez, Khuly, Quiroga. i. See attached plans Rodriguez, K-huly, Quiroga. j. See attached plans Rodriguez, h-huly, Quiroga. k. See attached plans Rodriguez, Khuly, Quiroga. 1. See attached plans Rodriguez, Khuly, Quiroga. 2802.2.3. a. See memorandum from Donald Cather, Director of the Department of Public Works and accompanying portions of the URI. b. Not applicable C. Total Private Commitment: $32,460,109 Jobs created: 425 Construction Jobs (UDAG development program) 0 Permanent Jobs. New Taxes Generated: $469, 562/year in the first year after completion d. Units to be demolished: The proposed development site is vacant. New housing units: Number/t e S uare footage Rental rate 154 One bedroom units 597-861 sq. t. 43.34--T6-In7mo 284 Two bedroom units 754-1200 sq.ft. $376- 0 46/mo 25 Three bedroom units 1153.4-1357.9 sq.ft. $417- 005/mo Proposed off -site housing: not applicable Number of School aged children: See the attached letter from Dade County Public Schools e. Existing facilities in the Downtown and Overtown Area will be utilized initially. Market conditions indicate that additional facilities will be developed as the demand increases. 41g_3QQ V 12powr BISCAYNE VIEW APARTMENTS SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST ufiRORAIk RIGHT Of WAY EXISTING LAND USE MAP —Jmml— P--&Sc A- n C. u RESIDENTIAL ® RESIDENTIAI ":.IMEHI:IAL CO MERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL VACANT IANb �.i�• � • PUI(ING ® INSTITUTIONAL PAft3/IIPEN ';PAVE MAP 40 19 MM BISCAYNE VIEW APARTMENTS � I I I II I{ t 1\\ I t • s 1 w ill I I iiiiiiiiil Wlei .. •..r �IlI1GTJ I : I �l , �l �- : [:OT1�I�: ITTT r.l Ti lII1 • • _ji.� • iT.iii•i.:i ijii� ..� • « I I I PUMP STATION ifT -,I rl� ]:Lmt11 gox i - 1��■■■■■■■■■1111111'IIIIIIIIIIIi��S�lU11�1�1`■ • .1 ==v ® SANITARY SEWER © STORM DRAINAGE IIIII • 211 40 9 L-A as __ UP .11 u r0 ��_ SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST PHASE I REDEVELOPMENT AREA --,w ® 4 ��// " .,( ••«• yEr11o"A4 OW -HT OF WAY O II�II �00 I _�� ,,,S 1 . 0 C ,. BLOCK/PARCEL NUMBER JUAN BISCAYNE VIEW APARTMENTS i - � � . ;; 1; i; ► � �'� � I i li _Ili; i I i► ! ;, ; '�. ,::� l ( � -,• � � ,1 1 a �� .s-., PR r �77>>l-- _ - G� - E 1-1/7 - 1 �, ♦ \j CFI72/. L 11 w w • 1. •�...., .11..,1 l Ili 1 T CG-2 GU 3/7 ..C..•s- ..N t FT i � <PR y W , j CR 3/7 CR -2/7 CG IT _ ........ . SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST EXISTING ZONING MAP 11I11LI VEIRORI-' RIGHT OFIMA♦ c O 400 �— o�.s_ � acM - =�o:.z.z. coocitr ts� 'qf3-3q0 2802 . a �. , c. , C^NCEFT FLat� 9 UDAG - C7r." PAGIs60 w Am"t" is MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT 90rom BISCAYNE VIEW APARTMENTS � w �4 2"F, 517 S.8 340C PARKWEST /OVERTOWN BLOCK 24 DESIGN CONCEPT Block 24 is composed of high-rise ocean view apartments, low-rise terraced and garden apartments, pedestrian oriented shops, structured resident parking, some private yards and a central recreation area which includes a pool. The low-rise garden apartments along N.W. 10th Street will be compatible in scale with the existing residential neighborhood adjacent to the site. Since many of these units are accessed at -grade from N.W. 10th Street, pedestrian activity along the street will be enhanced. The low-rise units also conceal the parking structure which occupies a portion of the interior of the block. A series of cobanna-units wrap the at -grade recreational spaces located at the interior of the block. These walk-up units, primarily 1 6 2 bedrooms, have direct visual and physical connec-tions to the pool and other recreational facilities. While the unit types vary around the perimeter of the block a clear and repetitive architectural style bonds the block into a cohesive visual statement. The high-rise building which contains ocean -view 1 & 2 bedroom apartments rests on top of the parking structure and is adjacent to First Avenue. This high-rise has the dual advantage of a prominent avenue entry as well as direct access to the private recreational areas at grade and on the parking deck. By placing the high-rise over the parking structure, all residents will have direct elevator access to their automobiles. A combination of exposed and enclosed balconies will allow high-rise residents to enjoy a fabulous ocean view and private outdoor spaces. The Ninth Street pedestrian mall will stretch the length of block 24. Terraced apartments which front the mail will create a transition zone between the Ninth Street shopping and the high-rise structure. These 1 and 2 bedroom apartments will have outdoor terraces overlooking the newly developed Ninth Street Mall. Siruny geometries and limited perimeter access clearly define the puulic and private portions of the block. By integrating the commercial uses and the low-rise housing units on First Avenue, Ninth and 10th Streets with the parking garage, the majority of the residents will have direct access to their vehicles, and what could be an obtrusive (parking) structure is hidden from view. The orientation of the high-rise building allows the greatest number of residents an ocean view and minimally impacts on the recreational areas of the block. Building along the perimater allows all the interior portions of the block, to be used as private residential recreational space. The design concept is well suited to the defensibility and security issues that must be concerns in an urban environment, but without turning our backs to the neighborhood we have created a cohesive urban desian statement geared to both the residents of the complex and to the community at large. OOnMQ L. stall. FAIR V D&Ad Lm. AIA AAA A Fpnon Bon A ~wv Chrfrw H FW68 s,,�_3. III H _al l �=t ��m��ll��ll�1■�l� DVERTOWN / PARK 1_01 V DEVELOPMENT GFi WILL B"ATM 40 wr rwaw�� if P► a w � a A N O :+L H nAG - CITY Of KIA.KI pACA 40 � f t _ _• 1 a DEMO!lSS1Nl'AL ZXPACT STUDY *rS DOME.\'T 0` F2 LC .k.\D 2802.2.3. 2304.2.7 0 INCCRPnRA?ED BY tiEFERENCE MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT BISCAYNE VIEW APARTMENTS DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST • MASTER Located in the City of Miami 73.05 SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNIN3 COUNCIL January, 1988 -qg-340 0 9 south florida regional planning council 3"0 h0jN-^0000 ow0 sere 140 holWwooe '10r= 3.X2o•cwo*c co' 2000 Door ;3C5` t2C 4266 January 5. 1986 The lonorable Xavier Suares Mayor, City of Miami 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, Florida 33133 Dear Mayor Suarez: The South Florida Regional Planning Council has officially adopted the enclosed Regional Impact reports for the Southeast Overtovn/Park Vest, Master and Southeast Overtovn/Park Vest, Increment I Developments of Rusiviiial :apart and forvarded copies to the Florida Department of Community Affairs and the South Florida Water Management District. These reports are provided for your use in revieving the Developments of Regional Impact pursuant to Section 380.06, Florida Statutes. Vhile the staff of the Council is available to assist in the resolution of any matter regarding these reports, the Council has no legal mechanism through vhich it can act on these reports again, except through appeal procedures. Recent changes to Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, and Rule 9J-2.25, Florida Administrative Code, are nov effective and require changes to and set criteria for local government Development Orders. For example, 360.06(15)6(e), P.S., nov requires that: "local government shall not approve a development of regional impact that does not make adequate provision for public facilities needed to accommodate the impacts of the proposed development, unless the local government includes in the development order a commitment by the local government to provide these facilities consistent vith development schedule approved in the development order..." Please reviev these and other Council recommendations, Section 380.06, F.S.(1985), and Rule 91-2.25, F.A.C., carefully prior to issuance of the Southeast Overtovn/Park Vest, Master and Southeast Overtovn/Park Vest, Increment I Development Orders. f�g-396 ♦ t Tsea. LViSIr Suaree Copies of any development Orders issued with regard to these projects must be transaitted to the South Florida Regional Plaminn�� Council and the Florida Depa�rtaemt of Coaeunity Attains vhich have 4S daps thereafter to mmlce an appeal decision based on whether the City,$ dsvelopaeat orders are consistent with the Council's report and recommemdatioms and other requirements of the law. 2f ve eaa be of further assistance, please call. Sin erelr, � � ,rl! , J I I. Jack Osterholt executive Director iJ0/mk =aclosures cc: See attached :1st g-34C1. 0 v MILE Ot CONTENTS bu LISTOP Mams....................................................... i LISTOF TABLES........................................................ !i LISTOF EmBITS...................................................... INTRODUCTION.......................................................... 1 PART I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................ 2 A. APPLICANT INFORMATION .................................. 2 D. PROJECT INFORMATION .................................... 2 PART II. PROJECT IMPACTS AND ISSUES ................................. 7 A. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES ...................... 7 B. ECONOMY ................................................ 7 C. PUBLIC FACILITIES ...................................... 15 D. TRANSPORTATION ......................................... 24 PART III. COMMENTS FROM OTHER REVIEWING AGENCIES ..................... 25 PART IV. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS..............................0. 40 -ng-390� 0 f use on n mu 1 Loudon Map ............................................... ZMaster Developmat Plan .................................... 3 Historic Places ............................................ I► Archaeological Zones ....................................... 6 12 13 qS-3qQ- 9 10 11 12 13 Title PAL laisting Development ....................................... S Proposed Development by Phase .............................. S Environmental Issues ....................................... 8 Project Cost ............................................... 7 Permanent Employment ....................................... 14 Permanent Employment Impacts ............................... 16 Fiscal Impacts ............................................. 17 Projected Southeast Overtovn Project Area Water Demand ..................................................... 18 Projected Southeast Overtovn Project Area Vastevater Flovs...................................................... 18 Cumulative Projected Solid Waste Generation Increase ....... 19 Police. Fire, and Emergency !Medical Services ............... 21 Cumulative Estimated Student Population .................... 22 Proposed Residential Development ........................... 23 '903-3-G LIST 0! MMUTS Inhibit ile. TI tl,t LM 1 Agreement to Delete Questions ............................. 62 2 List of Potential nasardous Vaste Generators .............. 71 3 Code for Vaste Types Commonly Associated vith Bach Industry ............................................. 76 4 Recommended Species ....................................... 77 SBistoric Places ........................................... 81 6 Archaeological Zones ...................................... 82 7 Master Development Plan ................................... 83 8 Annual Status Report Form ................................. 64 919-34n iii 7 INTRODUCTION This assessment of the proposed Southeast Overtovn/Park Vest • Master development has been prepared by the South Florida Regional Planning Council, as required by the Florida Environmental Land and Water Management Act for all Developments of Regional Impact. The assessment is based on information supplied by the Applicant, Dade County and the City of Miami staff, official plans, consultants, and field inspection. Additional research relative to specific issues vas conducted by Council staff where needed. In accordance with the Act, this assessment provides an overview of the positive and negative impacts likely to result from the proposal. The recommendations are intended to assist the City Commission in reaching a decision on the proposed development through consideration of regional, in addition to local, impacts and issues. Copies of any "development order" (an order granting, denying, or granting vith conditions -an application for a development permit) issued vith regard to.th13 project must be transmitted to the South Florida Regional Planning Council and the Florida Department of Community Affairs. 'ng-390 PART I - PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. APPLICANT INFORMATION Project Name: Southeast Overtovn/Park Vest • Master Applicant: The City of Miami P. 0. sox 330708 Miami, PL 33233-0708 Date of Acceptance of Application: November 18, 1987 Date of Receipt of Local Public Hearing Notice: December 11, 1987 Deadline for Council Action: January 30, 1988 Date of Local Public Hearing: February 11, 1988 Type of Development: Mixed -use Location of Development: City of Miami B. PROJECT INFORMATION The Cityof Miami has undertaken a Development of Regional Impact for a portion of the City pursuant to s. 380.06(22), P.S. The City of Miami, acting as a Downtown Development Authority pursuant to s. 380.031(5) as the Applicant, has proposed to have the Southeast Overtovn/Park Vest DRI be reviewed as a Master/Incremental development pursuant to s. 380.06(11), P.S., and Rule 9J-2.28, F.A.C., which states the following: If a proposed development is planned for development over an extended period of time, the developer may file an application for master development approval of the project and agree to present subsequent increments of the development for preconstruction review." "S-3290 2 V 7 •IRO AV1 GUANO Av1 POINCIANA Avg MAIIOgt Avg " o1NNgA R1Y PROJECT LOCATION E�owclr.:A MOAT" ♦AT CAWSCOAT t i i W ��� V1NCTtAY � CAUSEWAY t t �+ • • n • { "� VlQGIMIA It 1♦ C � g 11 ( 1 I 0 !It I JA Y SCALE FIGURE 1 `S-390 irp vARKyO►ER SPIKE IN51=1 IOM1l i spmiAL �SE ip RES I DENT 1 AL rE DENSITY F-00VA URE RESIDEM"a-mEIC►t"4W0 C P"ERCIAL 7 "WERATVNIGM DEWSM RESIDEMTIAL-NFICMBORM00D :0►MERCIAL M KRAM/MTGM DLUSITT RUIDEMTTAL-C"UMITT COWERC1AL NIGH M43TTT RESTD"TIAI.- MODERATE/MIGH DEASITT XWLMITS C044"CIAL MIGM DEMSTII CEKTRAL BUSIMCSl DISTRICT IN FEES �•i i ••i GENEML COMERCIAL TRAM PMATIOM GOVERNMENTAL ►L MASTER EVELOPMEN PLAN SOURCE:ADA SOU T H F LOR IDA REGIONAL PL Af�VKVG COUNCIL s) ci-3' I 2902.2.3. 2304.2.7. \J MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT WSCAYNE VIEW APARTMENT& . DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST . INCREMENT I Loaatod in that City of Niani' 73.09 SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL January, 1988 C1+g-340 fAm Of COMM LILTOP t omm....................................................... i LillOF TyLit........................................................ !i LISTOF EElIST1's...................................................... ili INTROD=ON .......................................................... 1 PARTI. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................ 2 A. APPIJCANT INFORMATION .................................. 2 Be PROJECT INFORMATION .................................... 2 PARTII. PROJECT IMPACTS AND ISSUES ................................. 7 A. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES ..:................... 7 B. ECONOMY ... • .. • • .. • ..... ............................... • 9 C. MLIC FACILITIIs...................................... 13 D. TRANSPORTATION ......................................... 16 PART III. COMMENTS FROM OTHER REVIEVIM AGENCIES ..................... 28 PARTIV. SUMMARY AND RECOMMRWDATIONS................................ 33 09-390 I It Uff w !ice rum lb, title. beL 1 tr "t Leaatlea........................................... 4 tMaster DmlopN t tlao.................................... i 3 Traffic Input Area ........................................ i� Uff OF ?ABL!! =jam,, TI tie t� 1 Existing Development ....................................... S 2 increment i Proposed Development ........................... S 3 Construction Costs ......................................... 9 4 Permanent Employment ....................................... 10 SPermanent Employment Impacts ............................... 11 6 Fiscal Impacts ............................................. 12 7 Water, Vastevater, and Solid Waste ......................... 13 8 Police, Piro, and Emergency Medical Services ............... 14 9 Proposed Rental Housing Units .............................. 15 10 Affordability: Lov/Moderate Income Families ............... 15 11 Existing Traffic Conditions - Segments Operating at or Belov LOS "E"........................................ 19 12 Committed Transportation Improvements ...................... 20 13 Constrained Roadways ....................................... 24 14 On -Site Improvements Needed to Accommodate Project and Other Traffic Impacts ................................... 27 ii _ ` S-3Q0 7 6t"W�v v 7 Lsi►ic M. UJIL bmL i Ilast�r Oa�r�leMsat Plea ................................... 49 = Mst2~62 • Map II Lprova is ........................ SO Amml Status Report tore ................................. 31 PS-3q0 us i This assessment of the proposed Southeast Overtovn/Park Vest • Increment I development has been prepared by the South Florida Regional Planning Council, as required by the Florida Environmental Land and Vater Management Act for all Developments of Regional Impact. The assessment is based on information supplied by the Applicant, Dade County and the City of Miami staff, official plans, consultants, and field inspection. Additional research relative to specific issues vas conducted by Council staff vhere needed. In accordance vith the Act, this assessment provides an overviev of the positive and negative impacts likely to result from the proposal. The recommendations are intended to assist the City Commission in reaching a decision on the proposed development through consideration of regional, In addition to local, impacts and issues. Copies of any "development order" (an order granting, denying, or granting vith conditions an application for a development permit) issued vith regard to this project must be transmitted to the South Florida Regional Planning Council and the Florida Department of Community Affairs. I'9-390 PART I • PROJ=CT DESCRIPTION A. APPLICANT INFORMATION Project Names Southeast Overtovn/Park Vest - Increment I Applicant: The City of Miami P. 0. Box 330708 Miami, FL 33233-0708 Date of Acceptance of Application: November 18, 1987 Date of Receipt of Local Public Bearing Notice: December 11, 1987 Deadline for Council Action: January 30, 1988 Date of Local Public Bearing: February 11, 1988 Type of Development: Mixed -use Location of Development: City of Miami B. PROJECT INFORMATION The City of Miami has undertaken a Development of Regional Impact for a portion of the City pursuant to s. 380.06(22), P.S. The City of Miami, acting as a Dovntovn Development Authority pursuant to s. 380.031(5) as the Applicant, has proposed to have the Southeast Overtovn/Park Vest DRI be revieved as a Master/Incremental development pursuant to s. 380.06(21), F.S., and Rule 9J-2.28, F.A.C., vhich states the folloving: If a proposed development is planned for development over an extended period of time, the developer may file an application for master development approval of the project and agree to present subsequent increments of the development for preconstruction review. 2 rg-340 It is further stipulated in s. 380.06(21)9 l.S., that the Development Order for a Master ADA shall specify the information which mat be submitted with an Incremental ADA and shall specify those issues which can result in the denial of an Incremental ADA. The recommendations contained in this impact assessment report deal with only those issues which were defined for preconstruction review for incremental RDAs in the Southeast Overtovn/Park Vest - Master Impact Assessment Report. Those issues to be part of the Southeast Overtovn/Park Vest - Increment I Development Order will be discussed in the body of this report. Other issues vhich cover the entire Southeast Overtovn/Park Vest development, including Increment I. have been discussed in the Southeast Overtovn/Park Vest - Master Assessment Report. The Southeast Overtovn/Park Vest development is proposed for a 209-acre site bounded approximately by I-395 on the north, N8 and NV 5th Street on the south, Biscayne Boulevard on the east, and I-95 on the vest (Figure I). 3 0 SOUTH cLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL slRD Avg GRAND Avt c ► INCIANA Avg - NARDIf Avg - sa.n: ADA PROJECT LOCATION .-: VCMt11AN tausewAr r At# a 4144' ;. ...:. l vua�Nu �tr r SCALE FIGURE 1 "IN The project arm currently contains development as shown in Table 1. TAW 1 QIS21140 0MLOTMW Varehousing, Vacant Industrial, and Office Office Retail Light Manufacturing 1Sa.1i.,1 (So.7t.3 1.zd�rt. ) (sa.Ft. 262,734 233,726 193,250 693,944 SOURCst ADA Residential eotal r._ 1160221 1,185 281 For additional development vithin the study area, the analysis has been broken into three phases spanning the period 1986-2005. Increment I development consists of the first phase proposed for construction during the period 1986-1992. The amount of development proposed for Increment I is shown in Table 2. The Master Development Plan is shovn as Figure 2. woe (84. Ft.) 65.E 93!8& ACA TARX 2 Dssidential (Dwelling Wits) 2,000 Cbrrmtim (Sa. Ft. 290,000 5 n 9-390 it ''� K• c�RILLOrQ� Sf SCE �---�' :NS rTuT1col Ali M I.AL iEE 1 :1 "Writort DEMSiTT RESID RES I DEl►T I Al ..... MODERATE o""m --� WESIDCNT71L-WEICKNORMWO COMERCIAL MODERATE'MiG�+ DENSITY RESIDENTIAL-NEIGHBOR40W C0*4fPC:JkL MODERATiJNIGR DENsiTY RESIDDITIAL-•COM04IT7 a MEWAL ®RTGN DENSITY RE3IDEwT7AL- MODERATE/NIGM DEM M COP"ITT a" PCIAL HIGH DENSITY CENTRAL luSIMES3 DISTRICT �•. . ;•� GENERAL COM OCIAL TRAMSPMATION GOVERNMENTAL 1r � FIGURE 2 �IIII I I 400 SCALE IN FEET MASTER VELOPMEN PLAN SOURCE:ADA SOUTH FLORrD►4 REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL PART II - PRWICT IMPACTS AND ISSURS A. RIMONNSNT AND NATURAL R=SOURCSS 1. Sum Impacts of the proposed development on the environment and natural resources vere addressed in the Southeast Overtovn/Park Vest - Master Impact Assessment Report. The exception to this Is air quality impacts vhich are addressed belov. 2. Air Quality The Applicant has submitted an air quality study for the Southeast Overtovn/Park Vest Areavide Development of Regional Impact. The Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER), Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM), and Council staff have evaluated the study. The study contains sufficient documentation of past and current air quality data obtained through 1987. Data is currently obtained from an existing air quality monitoring site operated by DEEM as part of a County -vide carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring network. Air quality monitoring is presently being implemented in the surrounding area as stated in the Dovntovn Miami Areavide Development Order vhich requires three monitoring sites, one for each sub -area (CBD, Omni, Brickell). 7 ''s--3.90 The existing monitor operated by DEAN, vhich is located in the Central Business District, has recorded exceedences of the U.S. environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards for CO in the years 1983.85. Since 1986, one exceedence of the SPA standards for CO has been recorded in Dade County. The reduction of CO concentrations has been attributed to the Federal Motor Vehicle Control Program. $ovever, if acceptable air quality standards are again exceeded, then the EPA may designate Dade and Brovard Counties as non -attainment areas for carbon monoxide. In the event that this designation occurs, the Counties vould be required to develop plans to reduce carbon monoxide to acceptable levels. This could involve a loss of Federal funding, constructing additional roadvay improvements in the area, and/or establishing a vehicle inspection and maintenance program to monitor vehicle emissions. Vith the possibility of air quality violations associated with areavide development, coupled vith the potential cost to the Region, it is recommended that the Applicant implement an air quality monitoring and abatement program. In addition, it is recommended that the Applicant conduct an air quality modeling study to determine vhat, if any, changes are needed in the monitoring netvork, Including an assessment of the need to continue monitoring. Conditions 1 through 4 in Part IV of this report address air quality issues. e 9 0 s. tcaNOMi 1. Impacts of the overall proposed development on the economy has been addressed in the Southeast Overtown/lark Vest - Master Impact Assessment Report. The impacts of the Increment I proposed development on the economy are addressed below. Z. Project Costs Table 3 summarises project costs, including construction employment. UZZ 3 �IION cams* (x 1,000) Zbtal hcoent . Qom, jai ant I fn A■ UI laed S 0 POD labor 446,624 10D Materials 108,788 70 Interest 131,907 70 holimim" plmwft 5.i39 SO 70M S174,83B am 1 lad ors ed by the City of Mead Ocastrwtion bploymmt - 2,2M Omtr=Uc n VaM - $21,173 per * 1987 dollars OS-34o 9 3. Permanent taeloymeet Table 4 summarises the projectes permanent employasat. I= 4 l8MNW DVLODW audw of 2490 as) N"All 0=os but Lrsmmrt I 122 759 861 MUHMs Ank, SROC About 25 percent of the jobs, 215 employees, can be considered nev to the Region. Table 5 summarises the indirect and induced effects of these nev employees for Increment I development. 4. Fiscal Impact Table 6 summarizes the projected fiscal impacts of Increment I on the Region using 1986 millage rates and historical average expenditure rates. 10 VIg-39. 0 4p TARS 5 A. @IROYIENT $0. FLA. PALM SROMARD DUDE MONROE REGION BEACH AGRICULTURE. FORESTRY, FISHING 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. AGRICULTURAL SERVICES 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. MINIMS 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. CONSTRUCTION 2. 3. 0. 5. 1. IMAMW ACTH! I NO 3. 9. 0. 12. 3. TRANSPORTATION AND UTILITIES 3. 16. 0. 19. 2. WHOLESALE TRADE 2. 7. 0. 9. 1. RETAIL TRADE 25. 67. 1. 92. Q. FINMCE. INS. AND REAL ESTATE 13. 129. 0. 143. G. SERVICES 23. 317. 1. 341. 12. GOVERNMENT 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. TOTAL 71. 549. 3. 623. 37. S. TOTAL WAGES (1000 S) AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY, FISHING 2. 6. 0. 8. is. AGRICULTURAL SERVICES 4. 7. 2. 13. S. MINING 1. 1. 0. 2. 1. CONSTRUCTION 46. 66. 3. 115. 26. MANUF ACTURING 55. 178. 1. 234. 38. TRANSPORTATION AND UTILITIES 95. 411. 6. 512. 46. WHOLESALE TRADE 38. 152. 2. 193. 23. RETAIL TRADE 275. 758. 20. 1052. 138. FINANCE, INS. AND REAL ESTATE 234. 2759. 8. 3001. 124. SERVICES 389. 5661. 26. 6077. 216. GOVERMENT 28. 65. 2. 94. 16. TOTAL 1168. 10064. 69. 11301. 651. C. VALUE OF OUTPUT (1000 S) A(IRICULTURE, FORESTRY, FISHING 9. 29. 0. 37. 85. AGRICULTURAL SERVICES 12. 20. 4. 36. 13. MINING 2. 5. 0. 8. 4. CONSTRUCTION 297. 424. 16. 738. 168. MANUIFACT1RINO 340. 1093. S. 1438. 235. TRANSPORTATION AND UTILITIES 303. 1306. 19. 1628. 146. WHOLESALE TRADE 77. 305. 5. 386. 46. RETAIL TRADE 623. 1720. 45. 23". 314. FINANCE, INS. AND REAL ESTATE 88). 10382. 30. 11293. 4". SERVICES 794. 11550. 54. 12398. 440. GDVER WMT 38. 90. 2. 130. 22. TOTAL 3376. 26924. 181. 30480. 1941. 0. VALUE ADDED (1000 S) AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY, FISHING 4. 14. 0. 18. 42. AGRICULTURAL SERVICES 7. 11. 3. 20. 7. MINING 1. 3. 0. 5. 2. CONSTRUCTION 52. 73. 3. 128. 29. MANUIFACTUR I NO 122. 302. 2. 515. 84. TRANSPORTATION AND UTILITIES 203. 876. 12. I m . 98. WHOLE SALE TRADE 49. 195. 3. 247. 29. RETAIL TRADE 312. Be. 22. 1196. 157. FINANCE, INS. AND REAL ESTATE 648. 7634. 22. 8304. 344. SERVICES 535. 7779. 36. 0350. 2%. GOVERMENT 30. 73. 2. 105. 17. TOTAL 1963. 17913. 106. 19982. 1108. Notai NueOara may not total due to rounding. SOURCE i SFRPC 7 tI N TM 6 FIM Dfl as SOUTHWEST OVERTOWNIPARK WEST INCREMENT 1 NAME OF DEVELOPMENT LOCATION MIAMI CITY DAM COUNTY SPECIAL DISTRICT BFUND9 DDA, LIBRARY SCHOOL DISTRICT �� TYPE OF OEVELOPIENT NINED SINGLE-FAMILV MULTI -FAMILY TYPE OF OWELLIN6 UNIT ER OF UNITS D0 2000 WUMBER OF STUDENTS PER UNIT 0.00 .13 NUMBER OF PERSONS PER UNIT 0.00 i•� TOTAL NUMBER OF STUDENTS 300. RESIDENT POPULATION 3600. NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES Ohl. prANMRTY VALUE 174630464. ANALYSIS CONDUCTED USING AVERAGE COEFFICIENTS CITY COUNTY SPECIAL DISTRICT am -TIME REVENUES 6 494009. • 234075. 6 0. TOTAL NEW ANNUAL EXPENDITURES • IiOW3S. • 1742270. • 232922. TOTAL -NEW ANNUAL REVENUES • 1360049. • I96906S. • 278379. -T SURPLUS 1 DEF i C i T 1 0 1742n3. 0 12%8113. 0 43436. MOO1LE-H" TOTAL O 7000 0.00 0.00 SCIODL S/SIR/CT TOTAL • O. S 7210167. • @=so&. • 3994137. • 934463. • 4440M. • 101337. • i469M' C] f C. MLIC PACILITI=s I. Water. Vastwater, and solid Vaste !able 7 summarises the Project's lapact on water, uastmter, and solid Vast*. TABS 7 Wnt, WSmt, AM Smm am Public A mm Pak Prwidmr of Available ftdu _ d Dowd Service _ Potable Vater 44 q= GPD 980,0D0 GPD Dub Canty Tie Oestwater 3509=-GPD 890,030 GPD owe Canty ?es Solid mote 20.30 7PD WA Dade Canty ?as 110.60 CAD GPD • GO= Pw dw TPD • Tan pa dey CYPD • Wbdc Yaub per dw WA . Not applicabls Sam: ADA 2. Police, Fire, and Emerzency Medical Services Table 8 summarizes police, fire, and emergency medical service availability. 13 h4-39- 0 UM • O11100 livvidmr bastion fopwu TIM folios city of Mod a Miami fblias Statim 3-5 ■uutss 400 Nit 2rA Avenue 9 Ovwwwn M M Station 3-5 mutates ISM W 3rd A awe Firm aty of M and a Omni fire Station S2 toss then 4 1901 North Miami Ave. mutate e M lire Station #1 lau then 4 I" M 5th Street minutes Nedinnl Cade Gouty a Jackson Memorial Hosp. - Se:viame Prederal Gov't. 1611 Nit 12th Avemn Private Sector 9 Osdsrs Medical Center - 14M Nit 12th Street e Victoria Hospital - 955 NH 3rd Strest e Veterans Addnistrstian - Hospital 1201 Nil 16th Strut Ste: AM 5. sow The Applicant proposes to build 2,000 dvelling units in the first phase of the project. The first stage of that phase has been planned and vill consist of 1,035 multi -family units and 28 ovner-occupied units. The breakdovn of multi -family housing units by price range and number of bedrooms is presented in Table 9. 14 c'9-39. 0 9 00 am 9 1 i♦mll. �O= Mabw of a dmem rL— — — —. so Un 0 !8m 02 0 !8!3 IM 14 14 SM 84" 4" J44 33M l610 343 343 86� Towl Qdta —43B 0 w "0 6 TIMF SMMM: AM Fifteen percent of these units are set aside as affordable housing for households earning 80% or less of Dade County's median income. The maximum rent for these 183 units vill not exceed the affordable limits shovn in Table 10 belov. TAKE 10 APFaMAI=: UNACCUM VI= FAMM Fadly Sin Nexlnn Monthly Rent* 1 S 392 2 $A 3-4 504-560 4-5 560-595 * VAM percent of pm =thly bmily inwo foc to d"a at Bar of Dade Oaaty median 1m as repoctsd by Aderel AD as of NaAmebwo IM. Reeves an foc the stand fly sise. MUM AD► 1S `.'Si-390 Plans for state one residential development also include 28 volts of housing for purchase. All of these units are intended for purchase by lov/moderate income buyers. Primary financing for these 28 units is available to qualified buyers through single-family mortgage revenue bonds and second mortgage financing through the Dade County Surtax Program. D. TRANSPORTATION I. Existing Traffic The project traffic impact area consists of three components (Figure 3). the first component is the SE Overtovn/Park Vest DRI study area vhich is generally defined ss I-395 on the north, North Sth Street on the south, Biscayne Boulevard on the east and I-95 on the vest. The second component is the Dovntovn Miami DRI study area vhich is defined as NE/NV 17th Street on the north, SE/SV 15th Road on the south, Biscayne Bay on the east, and Metrorail, I-95, and PEC railroad on the vest. The Port of Miami is also included for traffic analysis purposes because all Port traffic flovs through the Dovntovn street system. 16 l'9-3:9C. SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING CO NCI it Sant: ADA TRAFFIC IMPACT AREA * * * TRAFFIC IMPACT AREA •«••. ROADWAY UMS S.E. OVERTOWN/PARK WEST REDEVELOPMENT AREA VEST EA. FIGURE 3 9-3-9(1 NOT TO SCALE The third component of the project traffic impact area is the major arterial and expressway systems serving Downtown. These regionally significant roadways include Port Boulevard, Brickell Avenue/Bayshore Drive, SV 3rd Avenue/Coral Way, SV 7th and 8th Streets, Vest Tlagler Street, Biscayne Boulevard and MacArthur Causeway for a distance of three miles outside the study area boundary and Interstate 95, SR 836 and US 1 for a distance of five miles outside the study area boundary. Used on these criteria, the traffic impact area is generally defined as North 79th Street on the north, LeJeune Road (West 42nd Avenue) on the vest and south, and Alton Road on the east. Of the roadway segments studied six currently operate at LOS "I" or below. Levels of service on these roads are shown in Table 11. Tventy•tvo critical intersections are also identified for analysis. Based on the volume to capacity (v/c) ratio analysis procedures used in this study, almost all the roadvay segments within the 11RI study area exhibit good operating conditions. Bowever, it is important to notice that these operating conditions are measured over a one hour period. This type of analysis is therefore not sensitive to peak 15 and 30 minutes surges vhich occur on the Downtown streets. is 'nS-39. 0 a 0 M F 1 1 13MPIIC 11 M11MR. !rk4bz flowing lkam To Tim Odzwuan LAX KsOWM Blvd. N 9 62nd St. M 36th St. !M North F 1l MWw Kvd. M 36th St. I-395 NM North a 0=1 Wq► N4idoall Ave. Sit 15th Ad. IN vat a Na 1 I-95 SW 17th Ave. M South F 1S 1 SW 17th Ave. Dmalas Ad. NM South F NS 2rd Ave. I-395 Flsg1er St. AM South F Sys ADA 2. Future BacMround Traffic Impacts a. Committed Transportation Improvements Committed transportation improvements, for the purpose of this study, are defined as 1) those having construction funds allocated for the current year in the Capital or Transportation Improvement Program, 2) projects vhich are currently undervay, and 3) those required by a development order. For Increment I development, only those committed transportation improvements are included for the purposes of analysis (Table 12). 19 "9-3.90 ,.N � 12 MM - 99'M 'IIIMM'm/ 11l10V!!d� �ftlle tiael mum 190aft YM !1 ft =t. tivctlae► = 39300,000 2*90W I-96 to IS i I-95 Oantow matribAw AN 1B lane to I-32M 936 VWM antrarot mv North 2nd St. Atoastractian Noeh 3rd St. i Nwth 4th St. sisawa lavd. to NW lst Aw. Port Bridge, US 1 Ntv 6-Ims to Dodg@ Island I Gk St 972/SSi 13th St. D airmt SW 1st Ave. to Si ad Ave. 2,797v= 1,775,000 279491900D 226900D St 112 Road aaatrnctian 39390900D w 22nd Ave. to W 12th Ave. I-95 SDU*Aoid fsant- 03D9000 NW 54th St. to qp sod W 62nd St. I-95 Rmd tw assttna- 79596900D Nib 39th St. to tiara, I-95 8A w Seth St. ommctoc I-95 bmw ww Brit 24,43490OD S1 112 to N9 49th St. I-95 Qiden to MAD SY 25th Ad. 2-lane zm pis W 14th St. 4-Im 6MI= W 10th Ave. to I-95 20 a6w 86/87 86187 sw [�7 a6/8'l 9 Imu 12 (tlndrud) a 17tb An. 4-IM 39=0= am is i to nggw St. Mayan Pkdft We 4p MoWq= WAW MK&ft s 3D b� 79mt= A6/� ! lOdo St. ftplsaatian Irldoo U And 70,OOD 96W = 12dk St. k doo n Ave. / 909= WWW a 140, St. ra to Intocm. tian sW 13tb st./ 709000 WAW sW lsth AdJ stis W 3td Ave. * 19% dollars . BMKlb AGA, SPEC 22 4, 7-390 b. Permitted Developments Permitted developments include three types of development. The first type include projects vhich are complete and less than 90 percent occupied. The second type include projects vhich are under construction, and the third type include projects vhich have received prior approvals. In addition to the Southeast Overtovn/Park Vast study vest area, the Port of Miami and Dovntovn study area have been included because all traffic from these developments have to travel on the Dovntovn Street system being analysed. The projection of traffic volumes associated vith Permitted Developments, as well as Additional Approvable Development, is based on the trip generation model equations used by Metro -Dade Transit Agency in its Transportation Plan Update. Other parameters used in the traffic projections, including vehicle occupancy and mode splits by development phase and sub -area, vere also provided by Metro -Dade Transit Agency. At the and of Increment I (1992), except for traffic from Additional Approvable Development, future traffic includes existing traffic, traffic generated by Permitted Developments, including the Port of Miami, a background grovth factor for roadvay links outside the Southeast 4 'Dg-39Q Overtovn/Park Vest study area, and traffic generated by planned development in the Southeast Overtovn/Park Vest study area. 3. Level of Service Standards The City of !Miami has proposed the designation of the Special Transportation Area bounded by NE/NV 20th Street on the north, NE/SV 7th Avenue on the vest, Rickenbacker Causevay on the south, and Biscayne Bay on the east. This proposal vas approved on July 7, 1987 by the Dade County !Metropolitan Planning Organization and concurred by the Florida Department of Transportation staff and the South Florida Regional Planning Council staff. The approved levels of service (LOS) criteria within the Special Transportation Area are peak -hour LOS "D" on the interstate highvay system (I-95 and I-395), LOS "E" on the state highvay system, and LOS "E" plus 20 percent of roadvay links or intersections belov LOS "E" for the remaining regionally significant roadvays. 6. Constrained Facilities The Florida Transportation Plan recognizes that there are physical and financial limitations to the continued expansion of the State Highvay System. This is particularly true in a rapidly groving urban area vhere a "threshold" is reached beyond vhich expansion is no longer cost-effective. This has 23 S_390 led to the definition of these thresholds which will be used to define "constrained facilities." This recognition allows for the redirection of funds from a specific state highway to an alternate facility (usually parallel) or mode, such as transit. Based on the knowledge of the physical, historical, and aesthetic constraints within the traffic impact area, certain roadways have been identified as "constrained facilities" (Table 13). Roadway improvements required for constrained facilities will be termed "theoretical Improvements." N . 1' 1 Jf •J f �, FAA& ey twee sate Route Duirstion amstraint I.9a SR 9A Rgrsicai 1-395 SR 836 Rasical DAphia Dwess ay SR 836 FMSIcal BisosNr BadeVard SR 5 PN%1 1* Bridoell AVWw SR 5 Rgrsical i Aasthmtic M 1 SR 5 p Nagler Strat SR 968 P4"1=1 CM1 VAy SR 972 Rpreriaal i BisLo d=l 9 7thAth Street SR 90 sistociml i physical * Additiaml ripftt-of-tay is mWabLe slag Namm a BauUvard betumin NR 5th Street sad I-395. 24 s. i Additional Improvements Needed to Accommodate Project Traffic Roadways which will be operating below LOS "D" for interstate systems (1-95 and I-395) and below LOS "!" for state highway systems by the and of Increment I (1992) are identified. Since all of these roadways are constrained facilities, therefore, only theoretical improvements are recommended. In addition to the state highway system, another 17 directional roadvays vere analyzed during the PH peak -hour, and S during the AN peak -hour. Of these 17 links, 3 are projected to operate belov LOS "E" during the PM peak -hour. This represents IS percent of the links and is below the established criteria. During the AN peak -hour, one link, or 20 percent of those analyzed, vill operate belov LOS "E". This is also vithin the allovable criteria. A total of 22 intersections vere analyzed to determine operating conditions at the end of Increment I development. Among the 22 intersections, 21 intersections were subjected to PM peak -hour analysis and 7 were also analyzed for the AN peak -hour. The results of this analysis are that 1 intersections will operate at LOS "E" and only one is projected to operate below LOS "E". This one intersection represents only 4.5 percent of the 22 intersections analyzed and is well below 20 percent allowed under the LOS standards in a Special Transportation Area. ''S-390. Bach of the two intersections projected to operate at or below L08 "s" were investigated to determine if there were any geometric or operational improvements which would improve the projected level of service. It was found that these Intersections are built to the maximum cross-section within existing physical constraint. Table 14 shows the additional "theoretical improvements," associated construction costs, and the Applicant's fair share assessment. A total of $17,404,820 (1987 dollars) in additional off -site theoretical improvements to resolve project impacts have been recommended, with the Applicant's fair share being $280,806 (1987 dollars). Pursuant to Condition 5 in Part IV of this report, the Applicant shall complete the construction of the four -lane widening of NW 1st Avenue from NW 2nd Street to NW 10th Street. The total cost of this improvement is estimated at approximately $7,655,484 (1987 dollars) which will exceed the Applicant's fair share. i 26 '-'S-3;90 %lau 14 t Oar-SM DrIVAHM i 70 AanQ Ana= AND OM 13WM DrACTS 'Q�bail " ftic low 1. 2 M4-395: Add ores las IS 8 47,016 atdt directim tram tuts Iauleteed to I-0 L IR MW-3951 Add an ]sws Is atilt 2.8061= 21.329 N -etlan has I-6 to W Vib AMOne. 3. M EWI-399: AN ats Les 18 1•tDI= 191572 atmh direction true w 27th &AMA to Limn tad A. usages Iou riard: Add arse Lws 6241= 6,178 in amrh direction train MR 62ed Street to W 36th Street S. Boon Iadvacd: Add am Les 9601= 11,74 in aach direction fm K 36th Street to I-395 6. Owal i64n Add arse lane In aedt 200.= 1.933 directlan tree dridtall Avow M W 15th hoed 7. Carg Nep►: Add arse law in mch 9601Q00 7,191 direetla8 from SW 12th Avenue to Sii 27th Avow L trldaU Avenue: Add au lane in 9601= 4,469 eech direetlan from S8 7th Street to Ridranbidw Cmm%4W 9. US 1: Add tw lams in aech 8691120 7,037 dimtlan fsam I-93 to SW 17th Aurens 10. US 1: Add two lsss In aedt 214001Om 20,784 direction fc m Sit 17th Avers to Daglas toed 11. I-9St Add an Ln in aedt 3,126.250 99•QBZ dirctian fm W 79th Street to St 112 1L I-95: Add an ]as In and: 1,372,5W 21,897 directlm fm S9 8th Street to US 1 13. M let Avees/I-395 (Noah tee4) t 76,950 12.5M Add an lss to vestbatrd cm p aid restripe TML S22,867,320 S280,806 t 1987 Dollars 332M AM, SWC 27 $ nOM OTM REVIVIN AcMIS Tbis section contains coss+ents sent to the Council br ether apncies revlevitl the Southeast Overtovn/lark vest • Inez --- nt I DRI. "g-3so z8 (4ik of Minntt SERGIO ROORICAJU IBM July ?t, t9s? JUL Rt W. Jack Osterholt Executive Director South Florida Regional Planning Council 3"0 Hollywood Boulevard Hollywood, FL 33021 RE: Downtown Miami/DRI Dear Mr. Osterholt: C MAR M. 0010 city ma"01 Attached for your information is a copy of a resolution, adopted by the Dade County MPO, approving the designation of Downtown Miami as a Special Transportation Area. Please advise me as to what additional documentation, if any, is required to show the concurrence of FDOT, SFRPC, and the City of Miami. Sincerely, tea•, ' Joyce 'A. Meyers t, Project Manager Downtown Master Plan/DRI JAM/vh cc: Sergio Rodriguez, Director/Planning Department Peter Andolina/Downtown Development Authority Robert Sechen Joel Maxwell Kahart Pinder vh/87/081 29 /CANNING OE/ARTAAENT/t7f N.W. btd itf•at/Miaatni. ibrid� I711V(i�11 f7lia�i P 9-390 MWi� A/Mw • /.0.lM >11pr / hW�, fhri4 7ii:iOr 0 METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA A& METRO DADE CENTER July 149 1987 It. Sergio Ro&igues City of Miami PImming DaIm a snt 275 N.W. 2nd Street Miami. Florida 33128 Dear Mr. iguez: O"Its OF COU"" MAfe"" Suitt Xle 111 14 IN 1o1 8"Ir / MIAAII, FLORMA WIN•104 00 i1 43i i The purpose of this letter is to formally suiffit to the City of Miami Resolution No. HPO 15-87 appr Muni IPO concurrence with the designation of Downtown Miami as a ' pecial Transportation Area, including concu"ence with the levels of highway service and area boundaries recommended by the City of Miami. The Metropolitan Planning Organization Board unanimously passed this at its meeting of July 7, 1987. Should you have any questions concerning this, please contact the MPO Secretariat's office at 375-4507. navWsiJ1m 30 "9-340 s 6 I" r All ON NO. 190 15.87 F.Vix • • • I • • I' • �• '1'li • 1 I / X F • • / • • I 1 ''I' "1 •• i� i1'7 1 1 • / 1 WHEREAS, the Interlocal Agreement creating_ and establishing the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Midi Urbanized Area requires that the Metropolitan Planning Organization Governing Board provide a structure to evaluate the adequacy of the transportation plwvdng and programming process, and take action to ensue that legal and procedural requirements are met, as mere fully described in the Prospectus for Transportation Improvements for the Miami Urbanized Area (Second Edi- tion), and WHEREAS, the City of Miami has requested MPO concurrence with the Special Area designation action as reflected in the attached correspondence fr® the Downtown Development of Regional Impact Project Manager, and WHEREAS, a subcommittee of the Transportation Plan Technical Advisory Caammittee (TPTAC) has been discussing the various issues involved in the special designation action, and WHEREAS, staff of the various entities involved have participated in reviews concerning the proposed designation and all carob with the recommendation an levels of highway service for the area and area boundaries as detailed in the attached letter from the DRI Project Manager. WHEREAS, the Transportation Planning Council wishes to go an record stating concerns regarding the potential air quality impacts of the levels of highway service proposed for adoption in the downtown Development of Regional Impact (DRI) and wishes that these concerns we adequately addressed In the MI process. r• • • •. • 4 ie 11 • 1 I•:� �31 Section 1. That the MPO Board approves concurrence with the designation of Downtown Mini as a "Special Transportation Area" to include the area boundaries recommended by the City of Miami. Section 2. That this concurrence includes endorsement of the highway levels of service recommended by the City of Miami provided that the final and approved DPI document includes appropriate and timely air quality impacts mitigation measures. `S-390 Section 3. That not withstanding the stated concurrence with the proposed levels of highway service, Which include lowl, of service D on ', Ow Interstate MirySys two, eery effort should be made to strive for level of service C on the interstate hig tmy segments affected by this M. 7he fore`oing resolution was offered by Corned sinner Clara Oesterle who mvd its adoption. 'fie motion vu seconded by Commissioner Beverly Phillips and upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Commissioner Donbas M. CQey present Caamissionsr Clara Ossterle present Commissioner Deverl Phillips - present C w"sicnsr James Lord - present Cammd:s inner Harvey ldMn pr"ant Comaissioner Derry D. Schreiber - abNest C=dssioner Jorge 8. Valdes present Commissioner Sherman Nim - present Mayor Stepimen P. Clark - present 7he Chairman dwoupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 7th day of July 1987. MEIROPMIW PLANN G FOR mm mum UREA By h-- ose- MPO Secr 1 s 74 s jm 32 0 PART IV - SUlRWY AND ltiCOMNINDATIol1S 0 Summary The Development of Regional Impact assessment for Southeast Overtovn/Park Vest - Increment I indicates that the project vould have the folloving positive regional impacts: e Up to 215 permanent nev jobs vould be directly ,generated vithin the project area. Nearly 623 additional full-time jobs could be indirectly generated in the three South Florida counties, vith an $11.3 million increase in total vages and nearly $20 million in value added to the regional economy. e A net positive fiscal impact of nearly $447,000 vould be created by the project. Council evaluation indicates that the proposed development should not create adverse regional impact on soils, animal life, or vegetation. Bovever, in terms of adverse regional impact, the project would: e Increase potable eater demand by an average of 4409000 gallons per day. e Potentially increase the amount and number of hazardous materials used on -site and the hazardous vastes (a vaste that is ignitable, q1g_3gn corrosive, reactive, or toxic) generated, thereby possibly posing a threat to the Region's sole -source drinking vater supply. • The project's proposed stormvater management system vill increase the quantity of pollutants entering the Biscayne Aquifer. • Generate an average of 20.3 tons, or 110.6 cubic yards of solid waste per day. • Generate an average of 350,000 gallons of vastevater per day. • Place additional unfunded demands upon police, emergency rescue, and fire services, although the public agencies responsible for providing these services have indicated that they vill serve the project. • Generate over 486 PM peak -hour vehicle trips on the regional roadvay netvork and, along vith other development traffic, reduce levels of service belov "D" on many segments of the regional roadway netvork, vhich, vithout corrective action, vould produce a significant adverse regional impact. Recommendations Based on consideration of the above specified positive and negative impacts, it is the recommendation of the Council to the !Miami City Commission that the Application for Development Approval for Southeast Overtovn/Park West - Increment I be APPROVED subject to incorporation of 34 "g-39. L-7 • the following conditions into the Development Order to increase the probability of realising positive regional impacts and to mitigate, reduce, or eliminate adverse regional impacts. Td! CI?T SUU: 1. For the purpose of baseline data collection, conduct air quality monitoring for carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations based on the following requirements: a. Provide CO monitoring data for the Southeast Overtovn/Park Vest development area as shown in Exhibit 1 herein. b. The ionitoring shall consist of four (4) veeks of data collection during the winter months, November 15 through March 15. c. The monitoring shall be completed prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy vithin the area for the first development under this Development Order vhich meets 100 percent of the presumptive threshold for Developments of Regional Impact pursuant to Rule 27P, P.A.C., or by March 15, 1"I , vhichever occurs sooner. 'OS-34n 35 d. The monitor will be located at the vorst case intersection for the development area. The location vill be selected jointly by the City, Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER), Dade County Environmental Resources Management (DERM), and Council staff. e. Perform the monitoring as required by la. and lb. above as prescribed by the policies and regulations governing DERM and submit final air quality monitoring reports to FDER, DERM, and Council staff vithin 60 days of the completion of the monitoring. 2. Conduct air quality modeling of carbon monoxide impacts to determine. what, if any, changes are needed in air quality monitoring, including the need to continue monitoring. The modeling shall be completed vithin one year after the base -line data monitoring has been completed pursuant to Condition 1 above. The air quality modeling shall follov FDRR guidelines and shall: a. Be limited to no more than five (5) intersections to be selected from among the intersections projected in the ADA to operate at level of service "R" or "F". The intersections shall be selected jointly by PDER, GERM, Council staff, and the City. 36 "'S-390 u b. Be submitted in a detailed and comprehensive air quality analysis to lDU and DSRM for comment and review, and to Council staff and the City for review and approval. c. The report submitted pursuant to 2b. above is to include proposed changes to any air quality monitoring as justified by the air quality modeling analysis. 3. If the results of the air quality modeling study, as described in Condition 2 above, are 85 percent or more of the State standards for CO concentrations, an air quality monitoring and ohatement program vill be implemented by the City folloving the approval of the report pursuant to Condition 2b. above. The monitoring and abatement program, including a timeframe for implementation, must be approved by Council staff and the City subsequent to reviev and comment by the FDER and DERM. The program may include, but is not limited to, the folloving techniques: a. Transportation Control Measures (TCM). b. Physical planning measures (e.g. signalization, parking area locations, addition of turn lanes, etc.). c. The continuance of monitoring for specified areas. `S-390 37 4. If the results of the air quality modeling study, as described in Condition 2 above, exceeds State standards for CO concentrations, do one of the folloving: a. Vithhold the issuance of any building permits for new construction within the project area. b. Provide acceptable documentation vhich clearly indicates that CO exceedences will not occur, or that a particular development seeking approval does not contribute CO additions, or that any potential CO additions have been mitigated (according to Council staff and the City subsequent to review and comment by PDER and DERM) prior to the issuance of building permits for the particular development. Such documentation may include a modeling study vhich incorporates measures such as those contained in Condition 3a., b., and c., above. This documentaton must be approved by Council staff and the City subsequent to review and comment by PDER and DEEM. S. Before the earlier date of a. or b. specified below: a. four years after the effective date of the Development Order, or 38 `'9-39c; 0 b. the date of issuance of certificates of occupancy for more than 1,600 residential units, complete the construction of four -lane widening of NV 1st Avenue from NV 2nd Street to NV 10th Street. 6. Make efforts to work closely with applicable governmental agencies to ensure that the Metromover Stage II improvements identified in Exhibit 2 herein be completed by June 30, 1992, as identified in the current Metropolitan Planning organization's Transpnrratinn Improvement Program (TIP) published in June, 1987. In the event that by December 31, 1992, the Metromover Stage II improvements identified in Exhibit 2 herein have not been substantially under construction as determined by Council staff, then this situation vill be considered a substantial deviation from the mitigative efforts anticipated to offset the adverse impacts of proposed development to the existing transportation network. In this event, the Applicant shall be required to undergo additional Development of Regional Impact review for transportation impacts pursuant to s. 380.06(19)(a)(g) and (h), P.S. (1986). Such additional Development of Regional Impact review, if required, shall be initiated by the Applicant within 90 days of the identification of its need. 7. Integrate all original and supplemental ADA information into a consolidated Application for Development Approval (CADA) and submit two copies of the CADA to the Council, one copy to the City of '9--340. Mimi and one copy to the Florida Department of Community Affairs vithin thirty (30) days of the effective date of the Development Order. The CADA shall be prepared as follovs: a. Vhere nev, clarified, or revised information was prepared subsequent to submittal of the ADA but prior to issuance of the DO, whether in response to a formal statement of Information needed or otherwise, the original pages of the ADA vill be replaced vith revised pages. b. Revised pages vill have a "Page Number (R) - Date" notation, vith "Page Number" being the number of the original page, "(R)" indicating that the page vas revised, and "Date" stating the date of the revision. 8. Prepare an annual report in accordance vith the requirements specified in Condition 17 herein and submit copies to the Council, Dade County, and the Florida Department of Community Affairs on or before each anniversary date of the Development Order. The annual report for the Southeast Overtovn/Park Vest - Increment I must also be incorporated into the annual report required in the Southeast Overtovn/Park Vest - Master Development Order so that a single annual report is compiled for the entire project. 40 419_390 • 0 9. Vithhold the issuance of any building permits if the City has been detemined to be in non-compliance with Condition 5 herein. 10. Not repeal, nor amend in any vay, any other currently effective development order or building permit within the subject area previously issued by the City Commission pursuant to P.S. 380 (1987). This Development Order shall not create nor authorise the creation or imposition of any additional requirements or restrictions, vith respect to any present or future development under any currently effective Development Order or building permit Issued prior hereto. Nothvithstanding this paragraph, the City shall continue to have vhatever authority pursuant to lav it may nov have or may acquire in the future 11. Establish compliance dates, including a deadline for commencing physical development and for compliance vith conditions of approval or phasing requirements, and include a termination date that reasonably reflects the time required to complete the development. For the purposes of this paragraph, the commencement of development has already began by virtue of the Preliminary Development Agreement entered into between the Applicant and the Florida Department of Community Affairs. The termination date for completing development shall be December 31, 1992 provided that the City complies vith Condition 20 herein. The termination date may only be modified in accordance with s. 380.06(19)(c), Florida Statutes, 1985. 41 12. Identify in the DRI Development Order any approved development, Including the acreage attributable to each approved land use, open space, areas for preservation, and green belts; and the structures and/or improvements to be placed on the property, including locations, acreages, gross square footage, number of units, and other major characteristics or components of the development. 13. Rstablish the effective date of the Development Order as 45 days from transmittal of the Southeast Overtovn/Park Vest - Increment I Development Order to the Florida Department of Community Affairs and Council; provided, however, that if the Development Order (DO) Is appealed, the effective date of the DO will not start until the day after all appeals have been vithdravn or resolved pursuant to s. 380.07(2), Florida Statutes. 14. Meet the folloving State criteria for issuance of a DRI Development Order: a. The DRI Development Order shall specify: e The name of the development. e The authorized agent of the developer. e The name of the developer. e A statement that: 42 "9-39n �J The Application for Development Approval (ADA) is approved; or The ADA is approved subject to conditions, specifying the conditions, or The ADA is denied, specifying the reasons for denial and changes in the development proposal, if any, that vould make it eligible to receive a development approval. b. Findings of fact and conclusions of lav addressing vhether and the extent to vhich: e The development unreasonably interferes with the achievement of the objectives of an adopted state land development plan applicable to the area; and e The development is consistent with the local land development regulations and the adopted local comprehensive per; e The development vill be consistent vith the recommendations of the Council DRI Assessment pursuant to s. 380.06(12)9 Florida Statutes; and e The development makes "adequate provision for the public facilities needed to accommodate the impacts of the proposed development" or the City commits in the 43 InS-390 Development Order to provide these facilities consistent vith the DRI development schedule. C. A legal description of the property including acreage. 15. Not violate any of the conditions of the DRI Development Order or otherwise fail to act in substantial compliance with the Development Order or permit any property ovner vithin the boundaries covered by this Development Order to violate any of the provisions of the Development Order. In the event any entity controlled by the City or any permitter or landovner of anv tract or portion of a tract violates (hereinafter "violator"), the provisions of the Development Order, stay the effectiveness of the Development Order as to the tract, or portion of the tract, in vhich the violative activity or conduct has occurred and vithhold further permits, approvals, and services for development in said tract, or portion of the tract, upon passage of any appropriate resolution by the City, adopted in accordance vith this section, finding that such violation has occurred. The violator vill be given vritten notice by the City that states: 1) the nature of the purported violation, and 2) that unless the violation is cured within 30 days of said notice, the City vill hold a public hearing to consider the matter vithin 60 days of the date of said notice. In the event the violation is not curable in 30 days, the violator's diligent good faith efforts to cure the violation vithin that period will obviate the need to hold a public hearing and the • 0 Development Order will remain in full force and effect unless the violator does not diligently pursue the curative action to completion within a reasonable time, in which event the City will give 15 days notice to the violator of its intention to stay the effectiveness of the Development Order and withhold further permits, approvals, and services as to the tract, or portion of the tract, in which the violation has occurred and until the violation is cured. For purposes of this paragraph, the word "tract" shall be defined to mean any development site for vhich a building permit has been requested under the terms of this Development Order within the area of proposed development identified Southeast Overtovn/Park Vest - Increment I Master Development Plan (Exhibit 1). In addition, the phrase "portion of a tract" means a division of a tract into more than one ownership as created by deed or plat. 16. Designate an official to monitor compliance with all conditions of the Development Order and specify monitoring procedures that, at a minimum, require Development Order conditions to be reviewed by the City prior to issuance of any local development permit. 17. Require that an annual report be submitted to the Council, City, and DCA on each anniversary of the effective date of the Development Order, which report shall include, at a minimum: 45 "S-340 a. A tomplete response to each question in Exhibit 3. b. Identification and description of any changes in the plan of development, or in the representations contained in the ADA, or in the phasing for the reporting year and for the next year. c. A summary comparison of development activity proposed and actually conducted for the year. d. An assessment of compliance vith the conditions contained in the DRI Development Order and the commitments vhich are contained in the Application for Development Approval. e. Specification of any amended DRI Application for Development Approval or requests for a substantial deviation determination that were filed in the reporting year and to be filed during the next year. f. An indication of change, if any, in local government jurisdiction for any portion of the development since issuance of the Development Order. S. A statement that all persons have been sent copies of the annual report in conformance vith s. 380.06(14) and (16), Florida Statutes. 46 f�9_3g0 0 h. A copy of any recorded notice of the adoption of the Development Order of any subsequent modification that was recorded by the Applicant pursuant to s. 380.06(15), Florida Statutes. 1. Any other information required by the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) in accordance vith s. 380.06(18), Florida Statutes (1987). The annual report for the Southeast Overtovn/Park Vest - Increment I must also be incorporated into the annual report required in the Southeast Overtovn/Park Vest - Mlaster Development Order so that a single annual report is compiled for the entire project. 18. Incorporate the Consolidated Application for Development Approval, as revised pursuant to Condition 7, by reference into the Development Order for Southeast Overtovn/Park Vest - Increment I, as follovs:: "The Consolidated Application for Development Approval is Incorporated herein by reference and relied upon by the parties in discharging their statutory duties under Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, and local ordinances. Substantial compliance vith the representations contained in the Application for Development Approval is a condition for approval unless vaived or modified by agreement among the Council and the City." "-' 9-3 90 47 19. Incorporate the Council DPI Assessment by reference into the Development Order. 20. Require, vithin 30 days of the effective date of the Development Order, recordation of the Southeast Overtovn/Park Vest • Increment I Development Order vith the Clerk, Dade County Circuit Court, pursuant to s. 380.06(15), Florida Statutes (1986). specifying that the Development Order runs vith the land and is binding on the Applicant, its successors, and/or assigns, jointly or severally; and landowners, their successors, and/or assigns, jointly or severally. 21. Attach copies of all exhibits referenced in the DRI Development Order. 22. For the purposes of these recommendations, a building permit can be defined as a permit for any construction which will result in a net increase in development. This definition excludes renovation construction activity and reconstruction activity to replace existing development. 23. It is recommended that, pursuant to s. 380.06(16), F.S. (1986)9 the City receive a credit for any fees for services and improvements paid under this Development Order by the Applicant and/or the City against any impact fees that say be charged in the future by the Implementation of any local government impact fee ordinance for such services and improvements. 48 Illot Ilj11 I ;� DVERTOWN / PAH ^rWAV r►MIICI ^MACUT F-w' ►,__ n1\\\1m\ �Ii�Z� a •� TIDY S'iR"CT 1N5' -,'VT7ONAS E'fI= IAL USE r�iERA*E DENST^ � . • . • • pEcSDEt+�1A1-NEIGN9M�Kttii' (27�+ERCIAL �.........�q ao;�Rl,T1; - Ntcu oE•rsm �t�„� RESiDENT3Rl.-wFIGHHiDRH�[�D C(1MERCIAI. i R1SiDE�►�5jDENL'k7GN DENSitT TSA1-G[>«M1J1+71Y CA'►IERC'iRl w7Gw DENSITT "MPATUNIGM DEJ�S77T Cb1"'TT OUItERCIRI NIGM DENSm CENTRAL SUSINESS DISTRICT GE7MM COPWICIAL T1vspOR7ArtON GOVERNMEMAL O�rAitnOAl�iw���t,• EXHIBIT 1 44 �flll �00 I bw SCALE IN FEET MASTER EVELOPEN PLAN SOURCE:ADA EXHIBIT 3 0 STATE OF FLORIDA BLWM-07-85 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DIVISION OF RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT BUREAU OF LAND AND WATER MANAGEMENT 2571 Executive Center Circle, East Tallahassee, Florida 32301-8244 (904) 488-4925 Subsection 380.06(16), Florida Statutes, places the responsibility on the developer of an approved development of regional impact (DRI) for submitting an annual report to the local government, the Regional Planning Council the Department of Community Affairs, and to all affected permit agencies, on the date specified in the Development Order. The failure of a developer to submit the report on the date specified in the development order may result in the temporary suspension of the development order by the local government until the annual report Is submitted to the review agencies. This requirement applies to all developments of regional impact which have been approved since August 6, 1980. If you have any questions about this required report, call the DRI Enforcement Coordinator at, (904) 486-4925. Please send the original completed annual reoort to the designated local government official stateo in the development order with (1) copy to each of the following: a) The regional planning agency of jurisdiction; b) All affected permitting agencies; c) Devision of Resource Planning and Management Bureau of Land and Water Management 2571 Executive Center Circle, East Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Please format your Annual Status Report after the format example provided below. ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Reporting Period: to Month ay Year Month/Day/Year Development: Name of DRI Location: , CityCounty Developer: Name: Company Name Address: Street Location City, State, Zip code "S-3g0 BLWW07-85 Page two 1) Describe any changes made in the orocosed plan of development, phasing, or in the representations contained in the Application for Development Approval since the Development of Regional Impact received approval. Please note any actions (substantial determinations) taken by local government to address these changes. Note: if a response is to be more than one sentence, attach as Exhibit 'A' a detailed description of each change and copies of the modified site plan drawings. Exhibit 'A' should also address the following additional items If applicable. a) Describe changes in the plan of development or phasing for the reporting year and for the subsequent years; b) State any known incremental DRI applications for development approval or reouests for a substantial deviation determination that were filed in the reporting year and to be filed during the next year; c) Attach a copy of any notice of the adoption of a development order or the subseauent modification of an adopted development order that was recorded by the developer pursuant to Subsection 380.06(14)(d), F.S. 2) Has there been a change in local government jurisdiction for any portion of the development since the development order was issued? If so, has the annexing local government adopted a new Development of Regional Impact development order for the project? Please provide a copy of the order adopted by the annexing local government. 3) Provide copies of any revised master plans, incremental site plans, etc., not previously submitted. Note: If a response is to be more than one or two sentences, attach as Exhibit 4) Provide a summary comparison of development activity proposed and actually conducted for the reporting year. Example: Number of dwelling units constructed, site improve- ments, lots sold, acres mined, gross floor area constructed, barrels of storage capacity completed, permits obtained, etc. Note: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach as Exhibit 'C'. 5) Have any undeveloped tracts of land in the development (other than individual single-family lots) been sold to a separate entity or developer? If so, identify tract, its size, and the buyer. Please provide maps which show the tracts involved. Tract Buyer 52 "9-34% BLWM-07-85 Page Two 1) Describe any changes made in the proposed plan of development, phasing, or In the representations contained In the Application for Development Approval since the Development of Regional Impact received approval. Please note any actions (substantial determinations) taken by local government to address these changes. Note: If a response is to be more then one sentence, attach as Exhibit 'A' a detailed description of each change and copies of the modified site plan drawings. Exhibit 'A' should also address the following additional items If applicable. a) Describe changes in the plan of development or phasing for the reporting year and for the subsequent years; b) State any known Incremental DRI applications for development approval or reauests for a substantial deviation determination that were filed in the reporting year and to be filed during the next year; c) Attach a copy of any notice of the adoption of a development order or the subseauent modification of an adopted development order that was recorded by the developer pursuant to Subsection 380.06(14)(d), F.S. 2) Has there been a change in local government jurisdiction for any portion of the development since the development order was issued? If so, has the annexing local government adopted a new Development of Regional Impact development order for the project? Please provide a copy of the order adopted by the annexing local government. 3) Provide copies of any revised master plans, incremental site plans, etc., not previously submitted. Note: If a response is to be more than one or two sentences, attach as Exhibit 18'. 4) Provide a summary comparison of development activity proposed and actually conducted for the reporting year. Example: Number of dwelling units constructed, site improve- ments, lots sold, acres mined, gross floor area constructed, barrels of storage capacity completed, permits obtained, etc. Note: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach as Exhibit 'C'. 5) Have any undeveloped tracts of land in the development (other than individual single-family lots) been sold to a separate entity or developer? If so, identify tract, its size, and the buyer. Please provide maps which show the tracts involved. Tract Buyer 52 `S-39. 0 BLWM-07-85 • Page Three Note: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach as Exhibit 'D'. 6) Describe any lands purchased or optioned adjece"t to the original Development of Regional Impact site subsequent to issuance of the development order. Identify such lend, its site, and intended use on a site plan and map. Note: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach as Exhibit 'E'/ 7) List any substantial local, state, and federal permits which have been obtained, applied for, or denied, during this reporting period. Specify the agency, type of permit, and duty for each. Note: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach as Exhibit 'F'. 8) Assess the development's and local aovernment;s continuing compliance with any conditions of approval contained in the DRI development order. Note: Attach as Exhibit 'G'. (See attached form) 9) Provide any information that is specifically required by the Development Order to be included in the annual report. 10) Provide a statement certifying that all persons have been sent copies of the annual report in conformance with Subsections 380.06(14) and (16), F.S. Person completing the questionnaire: Title: Representing: 53 'PS-34n • 2344.2 APPLICATION POM • "g-390. 2304.2 , 0 APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT File Number MU4W It V intended that major use special permits be required where specified uses and/or occupancies involve matters deemed to be of city-wide or area -wide importance. The City Commission shall be solely responsible for determinations an applications for ma jar use special permits. (See Article 28.) The City Commission shall refer all applications for major use special permits to the Plan" Advisory Board and to the director of the Department of Planning for recommendations, and may make referrals to other agencies, bodies, or officers, either through the Department of Planning or directly, for review, analysis, and/or technical findings and determinations and reports thereon. (Section 2301.5.) 1, Cesar H. Odio, City Manager , hereby apply to the Director of Plan- ning of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 28 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Addressof Pruperty Block 24, Southeast Overtown/Park West Redev. Proj( 915 North West 1st Avenue Nature of Proposed Use (Be specific) A development containing 463 residential units and 20,000 square fe of commercial space. The development also contains a parking garac for approximately 467 vehicles and various recreational and service amenities, with the commercial frontage on the 9th Street Mall Preliminary Application I attach the following in support or explanation of the Preliminary, Application: ZI. Lwoop f a survey of the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered 2. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest form (Forms 4-83 and 0-83, attach to appiicationJX 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375 foot radius from the outside boundaries of property covered by this application (Form "3, attach to applica- tion). Page I of 3 Form 16413 Revised "S-340 2304.2 • • 4. Maps of: (a) existing zoning and (b) adopted compret ive plan designations for the area an and around the property covered by this application. S. General location map, showing relation fa the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical. features in and adjoining the project, and the like. S. Concept Plan (a) Site Plan and relevant information. Sections 510.2.3 (a through h) and 2304.2.1 (d through h). (b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed future uses, activities, systems and facilities. Section 2802.3.2(a). (c) Haw concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, change of zoning, or exemptions. Section 2802.3.2(b). T. Developmental Impact Study (an application for Development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). $. Other (Be spec(fic) 9. Fee of , based on the following: (a) $.01 per sq.ft. of building(s). Additional fees for any required special permits changes of zoning, or variances shall be in accord with zoning fees as listed in Section 62-61 of the City Code. (b) Fee tabulation Bui Iding(s) Other (Shecify) Page 2 of 3 Form 16-83 Total 2304. 2 Final Application I attach the following additional information in support or explanation of the final application: * Note: For Notification please contact Matthew Schwartz, Asst. Director, Dept. of Development 3 7 2- 4 5 9 0 Signature tV1dDKDK Authorized Agent Name*Cesar H. Odio, City ManageAddress 3500 Pan American Drive City, State, Z:p :".; =� r,c=: '_ „ Phone* 579-E040 �.•u JJ1JJ This appli%:otion is _ approved _ denied' in accord with City Commission Resolution No. other rgio Rodriguez, Director i Planning Deportment Date ' Page 3 of 3 Form 1 &83 'ng-394 n LJ CERTIFIED SUWZys IN PREVIOUS SECTION �g-390 CITY OF MIA"' ACQUISITION BLOCK 24 2304.2.2 2112197 • st D +'�•►i " ow- • 'ttal wlco l �tia+t p„�•sii*. SI• R4 I� am 'Ta.1N o $� OOD 50.0m � $a75o $M7W ID 2�+► � 1, NNWa.R 22,sm 1.16 tii.ly o ISM o Q� 17B.5m A� �B ss go, � 7.SCD uao�o 0 xim 61j" 1,it9�`o • o �o� �eo►aao �.z� n"Sw I.�.� n.Sa► 2*C J. 1t�tl mm L 904� J. Wla '� 1.,� It,Sm 58.99? �am 0 2 0 RXK W Also � 7.40 o o �.wa Momxya Z plc a► [re•frs A W �� o 1140 G.IIO IL49D 3L350 TT.LBn n� aaao 30,56 3� 16 Ha+.ra'ILM 237.® 1Ls1 13 �� slxsn �735 sz.e�,nno $eQ. OOD I{.z31 $Mm *Uko* prat r�o,3ao 1 W 'D • CERTIFIED LIST OF OWNERS TO BE PROVIDED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT -#ISCAYNE VIEW APARTMENTS =�'� -� • t r i i • I 'CG-2 U. 71 r for C-1/7 As CR-3/7 Nd..fa.b a. qp �1cgoiv, HC SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST w..+.� 4E TAORAII RIGHT of wAt •..... . n 1 .a EXISTING ZONING MAP L W CR-3/7 CR -2/7 �-1 1 it. I AP C = fl di. AYNE VIEW APARTMENTS JU L .,,t•,r -Yi r 'l _ I l - ll__ 1 ' I'd L II J I _ II -I > > -1 ! C-11 I Ll _1 Ll = I - r L�� 1 U .....r � �7 • • ��- —_ �.i i• it //� L• I=•: � :::.. _ _-�_ �- � • y.Arc <I w � s a I • , � u O • • g00ERATE 00stTT RESIDENTIAL ®... . "MCRATE OUOSITY RE3IDENTIAL-SEICO N(W)OD rXW(RCiAL NOOERATEMIGN DENsm RESIDENTfAO.NEIGHBURNp00 r(�.E•r;�1. "MERATE/mIrA4 0051TT KSIDENTIAL-CO"AITY 00WERC1AL ®"Tom 0"SITY RE3TDmTAL- MMRATE/IUGH OEIOSITT Con"I 7 7JMERf: ; LL NIGH OEN m CERTIUL KISIME3S 013TIIlCT • • • • • GOWMAL Cf7POMrAL - T11AMS/0/TATIdI 1+7� GOYERtME>tTAL tr3TtMtaAl sl�s tat, �ISIe MAP S� SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST 06 •'•—' ME IRORAII ROGNt Of WAY FUTURE LAND USE MAP lollL I inn (►� ' �� .-u 5E I - D C M koo 2 4.2.5 S C A E Vlk: tii �• � '�i Wit. ,•Solo ., ~��. •tip'—r,� Y• �\ SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST I -.Ass 1 - 0 C M PARTMEWS1 •.cool,•...., PHASE I REDEVELOPMENT AREA ---►® " BLOCK/PARCEL NUMBER .ii IIIII l . DOWNTOWN GOCER!W-VT Cr-4TER / LITT OF MIANI POLICE STATION 2. POST OFFICE ). LUMRTS PARK A. RIC[1ET01NEAL/RATFRONT ►ARK S. Gigs= PARK •. MARGARET PACE PARK T. DORSET PAR[ R. WILLIAMS PARK 9. DBMS PARK 10. RiEU.TIR0M000 SOCIAL SERVICE C"TQS 11. MIAMI STADIUM 12. SOUTH FLDRIDA EVAL.'A;;OV A TREATHE}? CENTER 1). ROOKER T. WASRINLTON JR. NICK SCHOOL IA. DOUGLAS nMff%'TARY SCHOOL IS. DUNRAR ULVENTART SCHOOL 16. WHEATLEY ELCICITART SC400L 12. MDCC. NEW WORLD CENTER CAMPUS 18. LTNDSET HOPKINS TEOINTLAL EDUCATION CT".'ER 19. DADE COL41" C7 L17 RAL LETTER 20. ;ACKSOH 4C40RIAL HOSPT'AL 21. CEDARS OF L`_SANON HOS?ITAL 22. DADE COUNT" JUSTICE CENTER 23. V. A. HOSPITAL 24. PORT OF MIA`ti 25. DETENTION CENTERS 2A. HIGHLAND PAAR 4^SPI7AL f�27. OCERTOWN SHOPrm. CEYTE4 26. 4DCC 4EDiCAL CENTER CA4PU5 29. FIRE STAT104S 30. ADM HISTRATION COMPLEX, DADE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS L J 7 �c13 C--lEl ©o ONANGIOWL E �j��� I — L& �4 �rLJ J jL-, STAO((IWrj�©©©Ej©L_3l-7r�^f_-�\ ;��CC�[�C10=F-J I;] coo©o� SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES ® BISCAYNE VIEW APARTMENTS a" 1 2 o Flo _ L • BISCAYNE VIEW APARTMENTS is 2.5 - al • Ife - - - - -ITT, r- { I It TA I - ;_ i F 1 i 4 oUM► STATION 71 it I�� I 24.. • .. • n • •••••••••••••••• l •r .., WTTI — I • �• r r• • I , e I 1 I IrillFTT1 � � � •1�I� 1� a • _ I -- yll . West iMW4 lTIIL i ................ GAJI VrGE11V"/r/lrtin nGS1 �SANITARY SEWER 2t SANITARY & STORM SEWERS ••••�� STORM DRAINAGE '802 . a. ,b. ,c. CONCEPT T-.,AN UDAG - r'7 Art",T M W10 pr^r• MAJOR USE SPECIAL PEIMMT amo- '°' ems, BISCAYNE VIEW APARTMENTS Boss" F f; a76 Wf, PARK WEST 'OVERTOWN BLOCK 24 DESIGN CONCEPT Block 24 is composed of high-rise ocean view apartments, low-rise terraced and garden apartments, pedestrian oriented shops, structured resident parking, some private yards and a central recreation area which includes a pool. The low-rise garden apartments along N.W. 10th Street will be compatible in scale with the existing residential neighborhood adjacent to the site. Since many of these units are accessed at -grade from N.W. loth Street, pedestrian activity along the street will be enhanced. The low-rise units also conceal the parking structure which occupies a portion of the interior of the block. A series of cabanna-units wrap the at -grade recreational spaces located at the interior of the block. These walk-up units, primarily 1 6 2 bedrooms, have direct visual and physical connec-tions to the pool and other recreational facilities. While the unit types vary around the perimeter of the block a clear and repetitive architectural style bonds the block into a cohesive visual statement. The high-rise building which contains ocean -view 1 6 2 bedroom apartments rests on top of the parking structure and is adjacent to First Avenue. This high-rise has the dual advantage of a praminent avenue eniry as weii as direct access to the private recreational areas at grade and on the parking deck. By placing the high-rise over the parking structure, all residents will have direct elevator access to their automobiles. A combination of exposed and enclosed balconies will allow high-rise residents to enjoy a fabulous ocean view and private outdoor spaces. The Ninth Street pedestrian mall will stretch the length of block 24. Terraced apartments which front the mall will create a transition zone between the Ninth Street shopping and the high-rise structure. These 1 and 2 bedroom apartments will have outdoor .terraces overlooking the newly developed Ninth Street Mall. Sirung geometries and limited perimeter access clearly define the puiilic and private portions of the block. By integrating the commercial uses and the low-rise housing units on First Avenue, Ninth and 10th Streets with the parking garage, the majority of the residents will have direct access to their vehicles, and what could be an obtrusive (parking) structure is hidden from view. The orientation of the high-rise building allows the greatest number of residents an ocean view and minimally impacts on the recreational areas of the block. Building along the perimater allows all the interior portions of the block, to be used as private residential recreational space. The design concept is well suited to the defensibility and security issues that must be concerns in an urban environment, but without turning our backs to the neighborhood we have created a cohesive urban design statement geared to both the residents of the complex and to the community at large. 00 WO L. Ska, FAIA M GwMO Lw. AIA Arwn R F" go GWN A M"Ov Cholw H Frn! MALL B AnM • ar owo m a L W 1 d �l N O N 14 • VDAG - C I Y Of M I AM I _- �__--- - PACE 40 4's=390 bl''^.AYNE VIEW APARTMENTS I �_U LILI I/ U HLI IU U -Is I 1 1) 1;1—ji --I z- -I 1(.Ea CI I Ll M=RATL O[NSITT • •i ••••••i �i•�. •• • • • • • • • • • • RESIDENTIAL �'• �t •••••• ��• ••• b.�••••• • • • • •J �•i L•: • LLi! AfNATE DENSITY •' ll(;: ia"�' NE31DOITIAL-MEIGHBOMDW MWERCIAI. MDOERATE/HIGH DENSITY RESIDENT iAL-NE TGNBGRWOO l"C•C;AL . •.. • ° • • •• •• • CL MDDERATEIHIC:I DE)15ITT ' RESIDEXTTAL-rCF"ITY 00WERCI41. r HIGH DENSTTT RESTOEMTTAL- fi MCDERATE/HI,H DENSITY :f)M1N[ry X*"FRCIAL CHIGHENT DENSITY CENTRAL BUSINESS D(STRT "T CENT • i r 4�iE i•i i .• GENERAL CGNERCTAL ' ` TRANSPORTATION i , - �' " "• 1. r.OVERNMENTU. • PARKWOPEN S►KE • ,/ �� ® TNSTI 1TUIPAL SvtzrAi. �eE SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST ME TROOtAn RIC."T Of WAY FUTURE LAND USE MAP •••ASS 1 0 C u MAP I H 1, r • • SEE ATTACHED DRI SUMMARY PREPARED BY THE SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL IN PREVIOUS SECTION ^9-3.9U . 2304.2. "9"3yG it 04.2. 1 ` J Ql UU U UU � JU UI _ J UU Uo UU nFF Fs !=' .. .. .. ..— ,f .t d 25 ISCA 24 41 I I I i.`­7- f E_ VIEW PARTM TS W > � W t J • i I — of ...19 W z > � u O Z • SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST PHASE I REDEVELOPMENT AREA --• M4ASI! I - 0llC VA o. WAY BLOCK/PARCI=1 M11YAso ..1......... 7Z7.e.......... 11111 1 1 1 A 1 1. DOYRTOWI GO'-EM:lrT CI'I-EiI/ an OP irt.la POLICE STATION 2. POST OPRCE 1. Lumms PARK A. BIMOT MIIAL/SAT►NORI FAME S. G2SSOM FAIR A. MARGAM FACE ?AM 1. DOM KT ►an �. WILLIAMS FAIR ,. BRs.ss PARR 10. MSICKDOMM" SOCIAL SEBYTCT ctwr aS 11. "TAM STADM14 12. SOUTH T1MM EYAL AT20Y A TRU74M C[MTES M BOORS T. YASMISCTOII JB, MACE SCROOL I&. DOUGLAS MMITART SCHOOL IS. QINSAR KIMM TART SCAML ld. WREATLET ELC1LVTASv SCYOOL 17. MDCC. M uORLD CE%TEB CA`trCS 18 LINN" NOPKI%'S TECHtilU11 EDUCAIION C,'7ER 19. DADE COUNT` C;.t'L'NAL CENTER 20. . ACKSCMI 4L'40RlAL M05FTTAL 21. CEDARS OF LESVJDN H;S°1TAL 22. DADE COUNT TSTTCE CENTER 21. V. A. HOSPITAL 24. PORT OF MTA 1 25. DETENTION CE+TERS 14. HIGHLAND PkAK 4CS►STAL 21. 0%ERTOW4 SHC►PING ct4- 3B. MDCC 41DICAL CENTER Ck4PUS 29. TIRE STATI04S 30. ADKINISTRATION COMPLEX. DADE COUNTY PUBLIC "nntLc BOWL 3 STAOlum I•s C��©IL�,CC©©C� , �. 0 a o���.�►r nc vitW APARTMENTS 2 •2. 1-�- � • 1 (II (` tt L: \ • loll � - I I IIIW IIN 117-97 _q-=IIIItz— 1111i1111111111 Fm r_ . �1;+111'I PUMP STATION µ � • low i � ' ��; � I : i�iC-iili.- - -:��i r�"1; � iii,l � : i�� I � r_: • I � - 1 � 1 � Ili : � I� -=_�I �i �I�� i ijT� �_•� l ;ice 1711T1 i Wl �— i EMM SOUTHEASTOC /PARK WEST SANITARY SEWER SANITARY & STORM SEWERS •�•� STORM DRAINAGE • s ARCHITECTURAL PLANS TO BE SUBMITTED SEPARATELY (2304.2.1 d, e, f, h, i, j, k, 1) 11 U 19-390 • CITY OF MIAMI, FI.ORe TD Don Ca th er Director Public Works n eROM INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM Ethew Schwartz \J sistant Director partment of Development DATE March 23, 1988 nLE subJECr Ma jor Use Special Permit REFERENCEs ENCLOSURES Attached is a memorandum which we have written for your signature, related to the Highway Improvements in the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Area. In order to proceed with the Major Use Special Permit required for Biscayne View Apartments on Block 24 the statements contained in the attached memorandum must be provided to the Planning Department. As we are attempting to fast track this permitting process and complete our submission package no later than noon on Thursday, March 24th, your early attention to i.iiab ivaLLWL wuulu i es greatly appreciated. MS/JDS/br Copy: Planning Department Attachment Cl" OF MIAMI. FLOWS TO Sergio Rodriguez Director Planning Dept. Attn: Joe McManus FROM INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM Donald Cather Director Public Works Department DATE March 2J, 1988 PILE subitc, Major Use Special Permit Biscayne View Apartments REFERENCES ENCLOSURES This memorandum is hereby submitted as a part of the Major Use Special Permit for Block 24, Southeast Overtown/ Park West Community Redevelopment Project, Biscayne View Apartments, located between NW 9 and 10 Streets, and NW 1 and North Miami Avenues. Related to the major intersections which fall within approximately 1/4 mile of Block 24, the Biscayne View Apartments site, the following are our findings related to Traffic linpact: a) The street network adjacent to the subject block has been planned and has, or is in the process of being upgraded by the City of Miami to meet the needs of the entire Southeast Overtown/ Park West Community Redevelopment Area including the Biscayne View Apartments Project. b) Related to the improvements to the streets and avenues, all traffic control mechanisms have and/or will be installed to meet the needs of the entire Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Area including the Biscayne View Apartments Project. DC/ MS/ br " 1-3.90 BISCAYNE VIEW APARTMENTS 11iT� - - - - - — L.�i A1� ol T j _ RAMP -- - Eiw. ACTIVE RAILROAD E3 METRO RAIL RAPID TRANSIT t - d� 1 : („ li ••• DOWNTOWN COMPONENT i ,\ `, �. � �i i t F-'- - :: � L.1J �H� �[ r'•°'1 OF METRO RAIL i I I I l i (PHASE 1• PHASE 11) 1 �+ j �I�t1 I +1 {t 1 Z ONE WAY TRAFFIC j; ARTERIALS 1 i .� Ike d.ttl ,il. Lill I1i�i I [nil r MAP i1 SOUTHEAST OVERMWN/PARK WEST EXISTING PROJECT AREA HIGHWAY & TRANSPORTATION NETWORK 1 DADE COUNTY PUSUC HOODS • FACILITY PLANNING AND CONDUCTION Appendix : -D- i 4W EAST DRIVE OApt COUNTY SCM00L aOARD MIAMI SPRINGS, FLORIDA 33166 *A. AOMPT RIP9ICIt C00A7RMA/v OAKK . A?MLM" �, Ir AQRAT►.. vict CMAl""Ap S" oNAeo eRITtoN 883-0406 001• 4 MOLANRf RRAOOOC►c r VA. RAVL L_ CIJAS TtMOEMT O► iCMOOL.f OA. WCMAIL K000 M& JAMIT R. W&ALi"v December 18. 1986 age woo . 1Ar be TuIIMIR Mr. Reginald A. Barker, AICP Urban Development Coordinator City of Miami Dupont Plata Center 300 Biscayne Boulevard May Suite 400 Miami, Florida 33132 RE: Southeast Overtown/Park Mast Project Dear Mr. Barker: Pursuant to your request, I have reviewed the Southeast Overtown/Park West plan to estimate the student population generated by this proposed project and to advise you of the schools currently serving the subject area. Ttie method of estimating student population, generated by new housing is to apply the Dade County students -per -housing unit (SPU) factors by type of unit in the Planning Department's 31 minor statistical areas of the county. 40 The SPU factors were computed by the Research Division of the Planning Department from tabulations of U.S. Bureau of the Census,1980 Census of Po ulation and Housing, Public -Use Microdata Samples and Summary ape F1 I a 3. Trwse factors are indicative of the approximate public school population likely to be associated with new residential development in Dade County. The Southeast Overtown/Park West project falls within minor statistical area 4.7. The student -per -housing unit (SPU) factor for multi -family dwelling units in this area is .25. I have applied this SPU factor to the two and three bedroom units planned for the three phases of this project. The estimated student population is as follows: Phase I 1986-1992 292 students Phase II 1992-1997 292 students Phase III 1997-2005 792 students 4ns—*'90 • Page 2 12.18.86 Mr. Reginald A. barker, ACIP • The schools currently serving the application area are Douglas and Riverside Elementary Schools, booker T. Washington Junior High School and Miami Jackson Senior High School. With the exception of booker T. Washington, all of the other schools are operating beyond program capacity. In terms of capital improvements, a new Booker T. Washington is being built and a new school facility for Riverside Elementary School is being planned. I trust this letter will provide you with sufficient information for the education section of the City's ADA. Sincerely(, /A&- Lail& N. Kalaf Coordinitor V Site Planning Section LHK:pw 0y_3� .