HomeMy WebLinkAboutO-10426Y
4kh
J-u3-1 v`.i
4/ 181.8a
ORDINANCE NG. t��_�����
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, REPEALING
ORDINANCE NO, 10273 AND SUBSTITUTING THEREFORE A NEW
CHAPTER 54.6 IMPOSING AN "IMPACT FEE" 014 ADDITIONAL
DEVELOPMENT AS HEREIN DETERMINED IN ORDER TO FINANCE
RELATED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS, THE DEMAND FOR WHICH IS
CREATED BY SUCH DEVELOPMENT; SETTING FORTH FINDINGS
AND INTENT; PROVIDING THE AUTHORITY THEREFOR;
PROVIDING DEFINITIONS; PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY OF
THE IMPACT FEE; PROVIDING FOR EXEMPTIONS; PROVIDING
FOR IMPOSITION OF THE IMPACT FEE; PROVIDING FOR THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SUBAREAS; PROVIDING FOR
DETERMINATION OF DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES; PROVIDING
FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF AN IMPACT FEE -RELATED CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM; PROVIDING FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF
IMPACT FEE COEFFICIENTS; PROVIDING FOR CALCULATION OF
IMPACT FEES; PROVIDING FOR ADMINISTRATION OF IMPACT
FEES; PROVIDING FOR BONDING IMPACT FEE -RELATED CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECTS; AND PROVIDING FOR
ESTABLISHMENT OF AN APPELLATE BOARD AND APPELLATE
PROCEDURES; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND
SEVERABTLITY CLAUSE.
WHEREAS, the City of Miami has for the past several years, experienced
significant development; and
WHEREAS, the amount and concentration of such development has contribut-
ed to the need for various capital improvements, including public safety, storm
sewers, streets, parks, solid waste collection and other general government
services that would not otherwise be necessary; and
WHEREAS, new building space growth projections indicate that such
development will continue and will place ever-increasing demands on the City to
provide necessary capital improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City is not desirous of funding all such improvements by
general capital improvement funds which are generally allocated to maintaining
existing improvements and services; and
WHEREAS, notwithstanding said increased development, there exists within
the City of Miami a severe shortage of affordable housing for families and
individuals of low and moderate income; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission adopted Resolution No. 87-619 on June 25,
1987, declaring; a housing emergency in the City of Miami relative to said
J-88-1313
4/ 18/88
ORDINANCE NO. 1041'1('
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MiIAMI, FLORIDA, REPEALING
ORDINANCE NO. 10273 AND SUBSTITUTING THEREFORE A NEW
CHAPTER 54.6 IMPOSING AN "IMPACT FEE" ON ADDITIONAL
DEVELOPMENT AS HEREIN DETERMINED IN ORDER TO FINANCE
RELATED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS, THE DEMAND FOR WHICH IS
CREATED BY SUCH DEVELOPMENT; SETTI14G FORTH FINDINGS)
AND INTENT; PROVIDING THE AUTHORITY THEREFOR;
PROVIDING DEFINITIONS; PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILI`['Y OF
THE IMPACT FEE; PROVIDING FOR EXEMPTIONS; PROVIDING
FOR IMPOSITION OF THE IMPACT FEE; PROVIDING FOR THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SUBAREAS; PROVIDING FOR
DETERMINATION OF DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES; PROVIDING
FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF AN IMPACT FEE -RELATED CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM; PROVIDING FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF
IMPACT FEE COEFFICIENTS; PROVIDING FOR CALCULATION OF
IMPACT FEES; PROVIDING FOR ADMINISTRATION OF IMPACT
FEES; PROVIDING FOR BONDING IMPACT FEE -RELATED CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECTS; AND PROVIDING FOR
ESTABLISHMENT OF AN APPELLATE BOARD AND APPELLATE
PROCEDURES; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE.
WHEREAS, the City of Miami has for the past several years, experienced
significant development; and
WHEREAS, the amount and concentration of such development has contribut-
ed to the need for various capital improvements, including public safety, storm
sewers, streets, parks, solid waste collection and other general government
services that would not otherwise be necessary; and
WHEREAS, new building space growth projections indicate that such
development will continue and will place ever-increasing demands on the City to
provide necessary capital improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City is not desirous of funding all such improvements by
general capital improvement funds which are generally allocated to maintaining
existing improvements and services; and
WHEREAS, notwithstanding said increased development, there exists within
the City of Miami a severe shortage of affordable housing for families and
individuals of low and moderate income; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission adopted Resolution No. 87-619 on June 25,
1987, declaring a housing emergency in the City of Miami relative to said
severe housing; shortage and authorizoyd cE rtain mo;Asures to (`.c)se said shortage;
and
WHEREAS, because of the benefit, to the general. welfare, it is the intent,
of the City of Miami to encourage the construction of all types of housing
opportunities within the City, particularly in those areas of the City which
warrant special attention because of depressed socio-economic conditions
existing therein; and
WHEREAS, the City also encourages the construction of housing units in
all areas of the City which are priced so as to be affordable by low and/or
moderate income families or individuals; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission after careful consideration of the matter,
deems it advisable and in the best interest of they general welfare of the City
of Miami and its inhabitants to adopt this Ordinance as hereinafter set forth;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI,
FLORIDA:
Section 1. Ordinance No. 10273 of the City of Miami, Florida, adopted
the 28th day of May, 1987, and all amendments to Ordinance No. 10273 adopted
subsequent thereto, are hereby repealed; and the following Impact Fee Ordinance
is substituted therefore.
Section 2. The City Code of the City of Miami, Florida, is hereby
amended by adding thereto a new Chapter 54.6 to read as follows:
"Chapter 54.6
CITY OF MIAMI DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE
Sec. 54.6-1. Short Title.
This Ordinance shall be known and cited as the "City of Miami
Development Impact Fee Ordinance."
Sec. 54.6-2. Findings.
The City Commission of Miami, Florida (hereinafter "Commission")
hereby finds and declares that:
(a) Development, other than single family residential development
and Certain other development as specifically defined herein,
imposes excessive remands upon City public facilities and
services and requires additional facilities and services;
2
I.LO496
(b) The potential for devclopment or properties is a direct result
of City policy as expressed in the City Comprehensive Plan and
as implemented via the City Zoning Ordinance and Map;
(c) To the extent that such development places demands upon the
public facility infrastructure of the City, those demands
should be satisfied by shifting the responsibility for fi-
nancing the provision of such facilities from the public at -
large to the developments actually creating the demands;
(d) The amount of the "impact fee" to be imposed shall be deter-
mined by the cost of the additional capital improvements
needed to support such new development, which public facili-
ties shall be identified in a capital improvement program, and
by the gross square footage: of development.
(e) The City Commission hereby finds and declares that the herein
"impact fee" imposed upon all new non-residential and all new
residential development as further described below, in order
to finance specified public facilities, the demand for which
is uniquely created by such new development, is in the best
interest of the City and its residents, is equitable, and does
not impose an unfair burden on such development. Specif-
ically exempted from such imposition and payment of said
impact fees are: (1) all single-family residential
development; (2) any development of less than 1,000 square
feet not resulting in a net increase in the number of
residential dwelling units; (3) all duplex and multiple family
residential development located in the City's designated
Community Development Target Areas; (4) all duplex and
multiple family residential development, outside of the
Community Development Target Areas, which is certified by the
City of Miami Housing Conservation and Development Agency as
low and/or moderate income housing; (5) any development which
is a non-profit joint venture with the City, a City owned or
operated facility, or a development using city owned land; (6)
any development for which complete building plans have been
filed as prescribed by the City's Zoning Ordinance, as
amended, before tale effective date of this Ordinance, provided
ghat the building permit for such development is obtained
within 45 calendar days from the effective date of this
Ordinance; and (7) any Development of Regional Impact; (DRI),
(excluding the Downtown DRI and the Southeast Overtown/Park
West Areawide DRY) for which Devolo pment Orders havo been
issued by the City before the effective date of this
Ordinance, provided that the building permit for such DRI is
I
obtained within 15 months of the effective date of this
Ordinance.
Sec, 54.6-3. Intent.
This Ordinance is intended to impose an "impact fee," payable at
the time of building permit issuance, in an amount based upon the gross
square footage of development, in order to Finance additional capital
improvements provided by the City and the demand for which is uniquely
attributable to such new development.
Sec. 54.6-4. Authority.
The City Commission is authorized to establish and adopt an "impact
fee" pursuant to the authority granted by the Florida Constitution,
Article VII, §§ 1(f), 1(g) and 2 (b), the Municipal Home Rule Powers Act,
Fla. Stat. Ch. 166 (1985), the City of Miami, Florida Charter, and the
Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation
Act (Fla. Stat. § 163.3161, amended by Fla. Stat. §§ 163.3177 in 1986).
The provisions of this Ordinance shall not be construed to limit the
power of the City to adopt such Ordinance pursuant to any other source of
local authority not, to utilize any other methods or powers otherwise
available for accomplishing the purposes set forth herein, either in
substitution of, or in conjunction with this Ordinance.
Sec. 54.6-5. Definitions.
As used in this Ordinance, the following words and terms shall have
the following meaning, unless another meaning is plainly intended,
(a) "Applicant" shall mean an individual, corporation, business
trust, estate, trust, partnership, association, two or more
4 -
104 6;
persons actin; as cx)-applicants, any County or Statca Agency,
any other legal entity, or the authorized representative of
any of the aforementioned, signing an application for a
building permit.
(b) "Appropriation"! shall mean the legal authority to make bn
expenditure up to a certain dollar atnount. All appropria-
tions must have a viable funding source at the time the
appropriation is made.
(c) "Building_ Permit" shall mean the permit required for new
construction and additions pursuant to Section 2-85 of the
City Code. The term "building permit," as used herein, shall
not be deemed to include permits required for remodeling,
rehabilitation or other improvements to an existing structure
or rebuilding a damaged or destroyed structure, provided
there is an increase of less than 1,000 square feet in gross
floor area resulting therefrom, or demolition permit.
(d) "Capital Budget" shall mean the City's current fiscal year
capital budget which is the first year of the six -year Capi-
tal improvements Program and which identifies all capital
projects valued at $5,000 or more that are proposed to be
initiated in that fiscal year or to receive any changes in
funding in that fiscal year.
(e) "Capital Improvements Program" (CIP) shall mean the City's
current six -year program of proposed capital improvements
which identifies all capital projects valued at $5,000 or
more that are proposed to be initiated during the six -year
period.
(f) "Capital Improvement Projects" shall mean all projects valued
at $5,000 or more that are proposed to be initiated during
the six -year period of the Capital Improvements Program and
may include any or all of the following: acquisition of
land, construction, improvements, equipping and installing of
same and all other work auxiliary thereto, including adminis-
trative, engineering, architectural and legal work performed
in connection with a public facilities project:
IL042
(1) public safety facilities and equipment,
(2) parks and recreation facilities and equipment;
(3) streets and highways, including such ancillary facil-
ities as sidewalks, street lighting, curbs, gutters,
signalization, signage, landscaping and storm sewers;
(4) solid waste collection facilities and equipment;
(5) other general government facilities and equipment
(g) "Community Development_ Target �Area(s)" shall mean those
geographical areas of the City designated as such by the
City's Department of Community Development or its successor
agency or department, using guidelines and criteria
established by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development or its successor department or agency.
(h) "City" shall mean the City of Miami, Florida.
(i) "Commission" shall mean. the City Corunission of lHiami,
Florida.
(j) "Comprehensive Plan" shall mean the City's plan for future
development adopted by City Ordinance No. 10157, and as may
be amended and updated from time to time.
(k) "Cost" shall mean
amounts spent
or authorized to be spent
in
connection with
the planning,
financing, acquisition
and
development of a capital improvement project, including
without limitation, the costs of land, construction, engi-
neering, legal services, financial services and certain
administrative costs.
(1) "Development" shall have the meaning given it in §§ 380.04,
Florida Statutes, subject to exclusions contained herein.
(m) "Development Subareas" shall mean geographically defined
areas of the City which conform to the City's established
Planning Districts.
(n) "Duplex Residential Development" shall have the meaning given
it in City Ordinance No. 9500, as amended, the City Zoning
Ordinance for the City of Miami.
10
(, ) "Gross Floor Area" shall mean the total square footage of a
building, excluding parking areas, on a particular site.
( p ) "Impact Fee" shall mean a fee, to be imposed at building
permit issuance, and calculated based upon the cost of impact
fee -related capital improvements in proportion to new devel-
opment creating the need for such facilities.
(q) "Im act Fee Coefficient" shall mean ttu2 charge per square
foot of development as calculated for each subarea and build-
ing type by dividing total impact fee -related capital im-
provement project costs by the gross square footage of pro-
jected new development starting at time of adoption of this
Ordinance through September 31, 2005.
(r) "Impact Fee -related Ca ital Improvements" shall mean those
Capital Improvements necessary to support and uniquely at-
tributable to new development as herein defined and which
facilities are identified in the Impact Fee -related Capital
Improvement Program to be financed by the imposition of an
"impact fee".
(s) "impact Fee -related Capital Improvement Program" shall mean
the listing of impact fee -related capital improvement
projects.
(t) "Low and Moderate Income Housing" shall have the meaning
given it by the City of Miami Housing Conservation and
Development Agency.
(u) "Multiple Family Development" shall. have the meaning given it
in City Ordinance No. 9500, as amended, the City Zoning Ordi-
nance for the City of Miami.
(v) "Non -Residential Development" shall mean all development
other than residential development as herein defined.
(w) "Render" or "Rendition" shall mean the verbal or written
announcement of a decision by the Impact Fee Board of Review
or City Commission; or the date on a City of Miami Building
and 'Zoning Department Impact Fee invoice.
1
(x) "Residential Developmcnt"
shall havz
the meaning given
it in
City Ordinance No.
9500,
as amended,
the City Zoning
Ordi-
nance for the City of Miami.
(y) "lingle-F _Residential" shall have the meaning given it
in City Ordinance No. 9500, as amended, the City Zoning
Ordinance for the City of Miami.
(z) "Site" shall mean a legally described parcel of property
capable of development pursuant to applicable City ordinances
and regulations.
(aa) "Zoning Districts" shall mean the classifications as shown on
the official schedule of district regulations and as delin-
eated on the official zoning atlas.
(bb) "Zoning Ordinance" shall mean one of the instruments of
implementation of the public purposes and objectives of the
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, as required by Section
163.3161 et seq; Florida Statutes, as amended.
Sec. 54.6-6. Applicability of Impact Fee.
This Ordinance shall be uniformly applicable to all new develop-
ment, exclusive of single-family, city -owned or operated facilities, and
certain other development as specifically defined herein. Specifically
exempted from such imposition and payment of said impact fees are: (1)
all single-family residential development; (2) any development of less
than 1,000 square feet not resulting in a net increase in the number of
residential dwelling units; (3) all duplex and multiple family
residential development located in the City's designated Community
Development Target Areas; (4) all duplex and multiple family residential
development, outside of the Community Development Target Areas, which is
certified by the City of Miami. Housing Conservation and Development
Agency as low and/or moderate income housing; (5) any development which
is a non-profit joint venture with the City, a City owned or operated
facility, or a development using city -owned land; (6) any development for
which complete building plans have been filed as prescribed by the City"s
Zoning Ordinance, as amended, before the effective date of this
Ordinance, provided that the building permit for such development is
- g o
10426
z
obtained within 45 calendar days from the effective date of this
Ordinance; and (7) any Development of Regional Impact (DRI), (excluding
the Downtown DRI and the Southeast Overtown/Park West Areawide DRI), for
which a Development Order has been issued by the City before the
effective date of nis Ordinance, provided that the building permit for
such DRI is obtained within 15 months of the effective date of this
Ordinance.
Sec. 54.6-7. Imposition oact��ec.
Except as set forth in Sec. 54.6-8 below, no building permit shall
be issued for a new development as herein defined unless the applicant
therefor has paid the "impact fee" imposed by and calculated pursuant to
this Ordinance.
Sec. 54.6-8. Establishment of Develo ment Subareas.
Development Subareas are established as shown on the "City of Miami
Planning District Maps" attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference as Appendix A.
Sec. 54.6-9. Development Potential by Subarea.
PLANNING
DISTRICT
A. EDISON
B. DOWNTOWN
C. COCONUT GROVE
D. LITTLE HAVANA
E. FLAGAMI
F. ALLAPATTAH
G, VIRGINIA KEY
TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE
Projected New Develo meat (1988 - 2005)*
in ross square foots e)
RESIDENTIAL
NON-RESIDENTIAL
TOTAL
772,320
11289,836
2,062,156
202006,667
10,493,783
30,500,450
3,099,000
11057,868
4,156,868
1,371,840
J1231,166
41603,006
604,800
507,128
1,111,928
6841000
21480,863 '
3,164,863
0
3101000
310,000
26,538,627
19,370,644
45,909,271
* Projections are for the period April 1, 1988 through March 31, 2005.
Note; See Appendix B for a more detailed breakdown.
Sec. 54.6-10, Impact,=Iv,eeyrelated Capital Improvement Program by
Total project costs by subareas are as follows:
ESTIMATED COSTS OF ADD17IONAL FACILITIES - TOTAL
FIRE
PARKS
GENERAL
PLANNING
AND
AND
STORM
SOLID
'SERVICES
OVERALL
DISTRICT;
POLICE
RESCUE
RECREATION
STREETS
SEWERS
WASTE ADMINISTRATION
COST
_-_-6--------------------------------------------=------------------------------------------------------------
EDISOH
3379,398
135,580
1t68,205
5608,613
1304,303
1200,994
5150,732
i1,847,925
DOWNTOWN
31256,425
11019,605
7,375,037
3,597,750
4,298,871
21129,118
1,425,681
28,1329557
COCONUT GROVE
352,578
47,410
539,964
1,862,288
931,141
2779090
169,499
41179,970
LITTLE HAVANA
939,672
68,574
298,781
9599993
479,993
469,284
363,988
3,5301285
FLAGAMI
154,926
0
131,721
603,595
301,794
97,335
66,545
11355,916
ALLAPATTAH
714,410
0
148,970
1,053,562
526,778
337,855
270,536
3,052,111
VIRGINIA KEY
87,635
0
0
0
0
37,019
31,737
1569391
TOTAL COST $5,885,044 41,251,169 18,662,723 113,635,301 $6,842,880 $3,548,715 $2,478,718 142,355,055
RESIDENTIAL - ESTIMATED COSTS OF
7 -------------------------------------------------
ADDITIONAL FACILITIES
FIRE
PARKS
GENERAL
PLANNING
AND
AND
STORM
SOLID
SERVICES
OVERALL
DISTRICT:
POLICE
RESCUE
RECREATION
STREETS
SEWERS
WASTE ADMINISTRATION
COST
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EDISON
19,654
1163,2G5
5227,938
5113,967
i46,964
118,679
1600,174
DOWNTOWN
289,863
394,357
3,137,360
51639,665
29819,831
375,977
351,309
13,508,362
COCONUT GROVE
53,524
209969
531,964
1,388,362
694,179
1509762
61,194
2,908,954
LITTLE HAVANA
26,232
t1,602
298,781
286,107
143,052
33,421
33,178
882,373
FLAGAMI
11,565
0
131,721
328,308
164,153
36,776
14,627
687,150
ALLAPATTAH
13,079
0
148,970
227,698
113,848
41,593
16,543
561,731
VIRGINIA KEY
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL COST
1409,030
$436,582
14,425,001
13,0989078
14,049,030
$1,235,493
1495,530
$19,148,744
NON-RESIDENTIAL - ESTIMATED COSTS OF ADDITIONAL FACILITIES
----------------------------------------------------------
FIRE
PARKS
GENERAL
PLANNING
AND
AND
STORM
SOLID
SERVICES
OVERALL
DISTRICT:
POLICE
RESCUE
RECREATION
STREETS
SEWERS
WASTE ADMINISTRATION
COST
----------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EDISON
1364,631
$25,926
10
$380,675
1190,336
$154,030
$132,053
11,247,651
DOWNTOWN
21966,562
705,248
4,237,727
2,958,085
1,479,040
1,253,161
1,074,372
14,674,195
COCONUT GROVE
299,054
26,441
0
4731926
236,962
126,328
108,305
11271,016
LITTLE HAVANA
913,440
561972
0
673,836
336,941
385,863
330,810
2,697,912
FLAGAMI
143,361
0
0
275,287
137,641
60,559
51,918
6689766
ALLAPATTAH
701,331
0
0
$25,864
412,930
296,262
253,993
21490,350
VIRGINIA KEY
87,635
0
0
0
0
37,019
31,737
156,391
TOTAL COST
$5,476,014
1814,587
$4,237,727
$5,537,723
12,793,350
$2,313,222
$1,983,188
$23,206,311
10 -
1L0426
.T
sec, 54.6-11,
Developtnetit Impact Fee Coefficients
RESIDENTIAL
IMPACT FEE COEFFICIENTS BY
TYPE OF SERVICE
AND PLANNING DISTRICT
ttlsq.ft,:�
-
FIRE
PARKS
GENERAL
-
PLAHNING
AND
AND
STORM
SOLID
SERVICES
OVERALL
DISTRICT:
POLICE
RESCUE
RECREATION STREETS
SEWERS
WASTE ADMINISTRATION
COST
EDISON----------------------------
$0.019
-__-___---_-_______t--__--
$0.013
10.21310.295
O.143
$0,061
__---___-_-
$0.024
$0.778 „ -
DOWNTOWN
0.014
0.020
0,157 0,282
0,141
0,044
0.018
0.676
COCONUT GROVE
0.017
0.007
0.114 0.448
0.224
0.049
0.020
0.93'9 -
LITTLE HAVAHA
01019
0.008
0.218 0.209
0.104
0.061
0.024
0.643
FLAGAMI
0.019
0.000
0.213 0.543
0,271
0.061
0,024
1.136
ALLAPATTAH
0.019
0.000
0,218 0.333
0,166
0,061
0.024
0.821
_ VIRGINIA KEY
$0.000
10.000
$0.000 $0.000
$0.000
$0.000
$0.000
$0.000
NON-RESIDENTIAL IMPACT FEE COEFFICIENTS BY TYPE OF
SERVICE
AND PLANNING DISTRICT
!1lsq.ft.)
FIRE
PARKS
GENERAL
PLANNING
AND
AND
STORM
SOLID
SERVICES
OVERALL
DISTRICT:
POLICE
RESCUE
RECREATION STREETS
SEWERS
WASTE ADMINISTRATION
COST
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EDISON
$0.233
$0.020
$0.000 10.295
$0.143
$0.119
$0.102
$0.967
DOWNTOWN
0.283
0.067
0.404 0.282
0.141
0.119
0.102
1.398
t COCONUT GROVE
0.283
0.025
0.000 0.448
0,224
0.119
0.102
1.201
LITTLE HAVAHA
0.283
0.018
0.000 0.209
0.104
01119
0.102
0.835
FLAGAMI
0.233
0.000
0.000 0.543
0.271
0.119
0.102
1.313
ALLAPATTAH
0.283
0.000
0.000 0.333
0.166
0.119
0.102
1.003
VIRGINIA KEY
$0.283
$0.000
$0.000 $0.000
$0.000
$0.119
$0,102
$0.504
as follows:
The derivation of impact fee coefficients by type of service is
a, POLICE - RESIDENTIAL
------------------------
PLANNING COCONUT LITTLE VIRGINIA
DISTRICT: EDISON DOWNTOWN GROVE HAVANA FLAGAMI ALLAPATTAH KEY
Est isited Cost
of Improvetents t14,767 $289,863 153,524 126,232 111,1565 $13,079 $0
Projected
Residential 772,320 20,006,667 3,099,000 1,371,840 604,800 684,000 0
Growth (sq, f t, )
lmpact Fee
Coeffir-ient 10,019 $0,014 $0,017 10.019 $0,019 $0.019 01000
11 -
1LO46
r
b. POLICE
- NON-RESIDEHTIAL
PLANNING
COCONUT
LITTLE
VIRGINIA
DISIizICT:
EDISON
bOYNIOIIN
GROVE
HAVANA
FLAGAMI
ALLAPATTAH
KEY
------------
Estiaated-CostM
of Iaproverents
1364,631
--r-------------------
11219661562
-_----_-_r-_------_
1299,054
1913,440
---------------------
1143,361
i701,331
$87,615
Projected
Non -Residential
1,299,$36
10,493�783
1,057,868
3,231,166
`07,128
2,480,863
310,000
Growth tsq,ft.)
Impact Fee
Coefficient
10.283
$0.283
$0.283
$0.283
t0.283
t0.233
10.233
c. FIRE AND RESCUE - RESIDENTIAL
--------------------------------
PLANNING COCONUT LITTLE VIRGINIA
DISTRICT: EDISON DOWNTOYN GROVE HAVANA FLAGAMI ALLAPATTAH KEY
atedCost--------------------------------------------------------------------
Estia of Ioprovesents 19,654 $394,357 $20,969 i11,602 t0 to t0
Projected
Residential 772,320 20,006,667 3,099,000 1,371,840 604,800 684,000 0
Growth (sq,ft.)
Impact Fee
Coefficient $0.013 10.020 $0.007 10.008 10.000 $0.000 10.000
(irsq.ft.)
d. FIRE AND RESCUE - NON -RESIDENTIAL
------------------------------------
PLANNING COCONUT LITTLE VIRGINIA
DISTRICT: EDISON DOYNTOYN GROVE HAVANA FLAGAMI ALLAPATTAH KEY
--- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estisated Cost
of Icproveaents $25,926 1705,248 $26,441 $56,972 i0 $0 $0
Projected
Hon -Residential 1,289,836 10,493,783 1,057,868 31231,166 507,128 2,480,863 310,000
Growth (sq.ft.)
Impact Fee
Coefficient 10.020 $0.067 $0.025 $0.018 10.000 MOOD t0.000
e. PARKS AND RECREATION - RESIDENTIAL
-------------------------------------
PLANNING COCONUT LITTLE VIRGINIA
DISTRICT: EDISON D04RIOUH GROVE HAVANA FLAGAMI ALLAPATTAH KEY
--------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------
Estisaked Cost
of Itproveaents $169,205 $3,137,360 039,964 $298,781 $131,721 $148,970 10
Projected
Residential 772,320 20,0060667 31099,000 11371,840 604,800 684,000 0
Growth (sq,ft.)
Impact Fee
Coefficient $0.213 10,157 10,174 10.20 #0 M 10.218 034
R 12 -
'10426
"'a
•
f. PARKS 01) RECREATION - HON-RESIDENTIAL
--------------
PLANNINO
COCONUT
LITTLE
VIRGINIA
DISTRICT:
EDISON DOWNTOWH
GROVE
HAVAHA
FLAGAMI ALLAPATTAH
KEY
__________________________________________________________•-----____�---------_______-
Es-tiiated Cast
of liproveients
10 t4,237,727
t0
10
10 $0
t0
Projected
Non -Residential
11289,836 101493,783
1,OV ,868
31231,166
507,128 2,480,863
310,000
Growth (sq,ft.)
Impact fee
Coefficient
10.000 10.404
10,000
10.000
10.000 10.000
$0.000
g. STREETS - RESIDENTIAL
-------------------------
PLANNING COCONUT LITTLE VIRGINIA
DISTRICT: EDISON DOWNTOWN GROVE HAVANA FLAGAMI ALLAPATTAH KEY
Esti_at-d Cost------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
of loproverents 1227,938 $5,639,665 111388,362 $286,107 $328,308 1227,698 10
Projected
Residential 772,320 20,006,667 3,099,000 1,371,840 604,800 684,000 0
Growth (sq,ft,)
Impact Fee
Coefficient $0.295 $0.282 tO.443 10.209 $0.543 $0.333 10.000
(1lsq.ft.)
h. STREETS - NON -RESIDENTIAL
------------------------------
PLANNING COCONUT LITTLE VIRGINIA
DISTRICT: EDISON DOWNTOWN GROVE HAVANA FLAGAMI ALLAPATTAH KEY
Estioated Cost
of Isprooesents 1380,675 12,958,085 $473,926 1673,336 1275,287 1325,864 M
Projected
Non -Residential 1,289,836 10,493,783 1,057,863 3,231,166 507,123 2,480,863 310,000
Growth (sq,ft.)
Impact Fee
Coefficient $0,295 $0.282 $0.448 $0.209 10.543 $0.333 10.000•
(itsq.ft.)
i. STORM SEWERS - RESIDENTIAL
PLANNING COCONUT LITTLE VIRGINIA
DISTRICT: EDISON DOWNTOWN GROVE HAVANA FLAGAMI ALLAPATTAH KEY
Estisated Cost
of leprovegents 1113,967 1z1819,831 1694,179 1143,052 $164,153 i113,848 10
Projected
Residential 772,320 20,006,667 3,099,000 9,371,840 604,800 684,000 0
Growth (sq,ft,)
Impact Fee
Coefficient 10,14$ 10,141 $0,224 10.104 10,271 $0.166 10.Oflo
W 13 w
104
e
j, STORM SEWERS -
HON°RESIbENIIAL
PLANNING
COCONUT
LITTLE
VIRDINIA
DISTRICT;
EDISON
DOWNTOWN
GROVE
HAVANA
FLAGAMI
ALLAPATTAH
KEY
----------------
Estilated Cost
-----------------
------------
-----------------
-----------------------
Cf IAPI'oveiehts
$190,336
11,479,040
1236,962
1336,941
107641
1412,930
10
Projected
Non-Residehtial
11289,836
10,493,783
1,057,868
3,2311166
507,128
2,480,863
)10,000
- Growth (sq.ft.)
Impact Fee
Coefficient
t0.143
10.141
t0,224
10,104
$0.271
t0.16o
$0.000
(S/sq.ft,)
k. SOLID
----------------------------
WASTE - PESIDENTIAL
PLANNING
COCONUT
LITTLE
VIRGINIA
_
DISTRICT:
EDISON
DOWNTOWN
GROVE
HAVANA
FLAGAMI
ALLAPATTAH
KEY
EstisatedCost-------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------
of laproveients
146,964
5375,977
1150,762
183,421
136,776
141,593
30
Projected
Residential
7720320
20,006,667
3,099,000
11371,840
604,800
684,000
0
Growth (sq.ft.)
Impact Fee
Coefficient
$0.061
$0.044
$0.049
$0.061
$0.061
$0.061
10.000
(tlsq,ft.>
. SOLID WASTE - NON-RESIDENTIAL
PLANNING COCONUT LITTLE VIRGINIA
DISTRICT: EDISON DOWNTOWN GROVE HAVANA FLAGAMI ALLAPATTAH KEY
EstiaatedCost-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
of loprovesents 1154,030 11,253,161 S126,328 $385,863 $60,559 $296,262 $37,019
Projected
Non-Residentiai 1,289,836 10,493,783 1,057,868 3,231,166 507,128 2,480,863 310,000
Growth (sq.ft.)
Impact Fee
Coefficient $0.119 $0.119 $0.119 $0.119 10,119 t0,119 t0.119
o. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION - RESIDENTIAL
PLANNING COCONUT LITTLE VIRGINIA
DISTRICT; EDISON DOWNTOWN GROVE HAVANA FLAGAMI ALLAPATTAH KEY
Esti�ated-C------------------ - - ------ -- --- -- --------------------------
ost
of Isproments 118,679 $351,309 16l,194 $339178 $14,627 $16,543 10
Projected
Residential Z7213N 20,006,667 3,099,000 11371,840 604,800 684,000 0
Growth
Impact Fee
Coefficient $0,024 0.013 10,020 10,024 $0,024 $0,024 10.000
14
Y
n. GENERAL SERVICES ADM1HISf A1I0H NON�RESIDEN 1At
rrrrrr rrrrarwrr_rrYY. +1�Y4Yar_wrwlwLrr_riwrrriw rrr+rrr
PL44NIHO
COCOM
LI11LE
U1001HIA
61STPICTI
EDISOH
DOMOWN
ONVE
HAUAHA
FLAGAMI
ALLAPAIIAH
KEY
Esti-aced Cost a----------------------------r-r---r--_----
--------
---------------------r--_--------
Of Improverents
$132,053
1110741372
$108,305
1330,810
151,918
t253,993
011737
Projected
Mon -Residential
11289,836
10,493,183
11057,868
31231,166
''007,128
2,480,863
310,000
Growth (sq.ft.)
Impact Fee
Coefficient
10.102
$0.102
$0.102
$0.102
10.102
$0.102
$0.102
Wsq.ft.)
Sec. 54.6-12. Calculation of Impact Fee.
Upon receipt of an application for a building permit for a new
development, the Building and Zoning Department shall determine the
amount of the "impact fee" due pursuant to the following procedure:
(a) determine whether the development is exempt by virtue of the
conditions specified in Sec. 54.6-6.
(b) identify the property's development subarea (i.e., the Plan-
ning District wherein it falls);
(c) calculate the gross square Footage of floor area of the
building for residential and non-residential;
(d) multiply the gross square footage of the development by the
appropriate subarea "impact fee" coefficient;
(e) review and, if appropriate reduce, upon written request of the
applicant and verification by the Planning Department, the
amount of impact fee calculated and otherwise due, by the
value to the City of any capital improvements provided by the
applicant which are listed in the Impact Fee -related Capital
Improvement Program. Evidence of capital improvement provi-
sion cost shall be submitted by the applicant and shall be
subject to review by the City. In no event, however, shall a
credit be given for that specific category of projects for
more than the amount of the impact fee otherwise due pursuant
to this Ordinance.
M Prior to making an application for a building permit, an
applicant may request a non -binding good faith impact fee
15 -.
, 0426 .
estimate from the Building and "Zoning Department, The
estimate shall be based upon the development potential of the
particular site as measured by either 1 the maximum
allowable gross square footage permitted by existing zoning,
or (2) the total. gross square footage indicated in the
applicant's building plan. The Square footage thus determined
is then multiplied by the applicable impact fee coorricient.
Cleo. 54.6-13. Administration of Impact Fee.
(a) Collection of Impact Fee:
Impact fees due pursuant to this Ordinance shall be collected
by the Building and Zoning Department prior to issuance of a
building permit.
(b) Transfer, of Funds to Finance Department:
Upon receipt of impact fees, the Building and Zoning Depart-
ment shall transfer such funds to the City Finance Department
which shall be responsible for placement of such funds into
separate accounts as hereinafter specified. All such funds
shall be deposited in interest -bearing accounts in a bank
authorized to receive deposits of City funds. Interest earned
by each account shall be credited to that account and shall be
used solely for the purposes specified for funds of such
account.
(c) Establishment and Maintenance of Accounts:
The City Finance Department shall establish separate accounts
and maintain records for each such account, whereby impact
fees collected can be segregated by type of project, planning
district and building permit.
(d) Maintenance of Records:
The City Finance Department shall maintain and keep adequate
financial records for each such account which shall show the
source and disbursement of all revenues, which shall account
for all monies received; and which shall ensure that the
disbursement of funds from each account shall be used solely
and exclusively for the provision of project�s specified in the
Impact Fee -related Capital Improvements Program for the
particular subarea,
- 16. T
10426
-��
(e\ RefT Lee:
(1) The current owner of property on which an impact fee has
been paid may apply for a refund of such Pee if -. the City
has failed to *noUmbor or spend the collected rees by the
' end or the calendar quarter immediately following six (8)
years of the date of payment of the impact fee; or the
building permit for which the impact roe has been paid has
lapsed for non -commencement or construction; or the
project for which e building permit has been issued has
been altered resulting in a decrease in the amount of the
. impact fee due.
' (2) Only the current owner of property may petition for a
refund. & petition for refund shall be filed within One
year of any of the above specified events giving rise to
the right to claim a refund.
(3) The petition for refund shall be submitted to the City
Manager or his duly designated agent on a form provided by
' the City for such purpose. The petition shall contain: a
notarized affidavit that petitioner is the current owner
of the property; a certified copy of latest tax records of
�
Metropolitan Dade County showing the owner of the suhject
^
' property; a copy of the dated receipt for payment of the
impact fee issued by the Clty~s Department of Building and
Zoning; and a statement of the basis upon Wblob the refund .
-4 is sought.
f
� (4) Within one month of the date of receipt of a petition for
�+
�
refund, the City Manager or his duly designated agent must
provide the petitioner, in writing, with o decision on the
refund request. The decision must include the reasons for ^
-~ ^ the deulai0P including, as may be appropriate, a determi-
nation of whether the collected fees have been encumbered'
.�
` or spent in accordance with the requirements of this
/.' Chapter. If a refund is due petitioner, the City Manager
� or his duly designated agent shall notify the Clty^s
'
° Finance Director and request that a refund payment be made
�to petitioner,
." .
`
� 17 �
�
1LO426
(5) Any money returned pursuant to this subsection shall be
returned with interest at the rate of three percent (3%)
per annum.
(6) petitioner may appeal the determination of the City
Manager to the Impact Fee Hoard of Review;
(f) Annual Review and Modification:
The City shall annually, in conjunction with the annual
capital budget and capital improvements prograca adoption
process, review Impact Fee Ordinance procedures, assumptions,
formulas, zone designations and fee assessments and make such
modifications as are deemed necessary as a result of (1)
development occurring in the prior year; (2) construction of
proposed public facilities; (3) changing facility needs; (4)
inflation and other economic factors; (5) revised cost esti=
mates for public facilities and/or improvements; (6) changes
in the. availability of other funding sources applicable to
impact fee -related capital improvements; (7) such other
factors as may be relevant. Modifications to the Impact Fee -
related Capital Improvement Program shall be recommended for
adoption prior to October 1 of each year and shall be effec-
tive on October 1.
Sec. 54.6-14. Administrative Fees.
Expenses to be incurred by the City in connection with the adminis-
tration of the Development- Impact Fee Ordinance have been estimated and
budgeted and have been determined to be of benefit to the properties
therein and shall be reimbursed to Impact Fee Administration Fund of the
City out of the revenues accruing through the imposition of a
non-refundable service charge in the amount of three percent (3%) of the
impact fee due. The non-refundable service charges are in addition to
and shall be paid separately from the assessment, but shall be payable at
the time of application for the building permit and shall be for the sole
purpose of defraying expenses as provided herein,
Sec, 54.6-15. Bonder of Capital Improvement Projects,
The City may issue bonds, revenue certificates and other obliga-
tions of indebtedness in such manner and subject to such limitations as
mtiiy be provided by law, in furth(.,ran(,e of the provision of impact fee -
related projects. Funds pledged toward retirement of bonds) revenue
eertiricates or other obligations of indebtedness for such projects may
include impact fees and other City revenues as may be allocated by the
City Commission. Imptsct fees paid pursuant to this urd1nance, however)
shall be restricted to use solely and exclusively for .financing, direct-
ly, or as a pledge against bonds, revenuo certificat-t}s and other obiiCa-
tions of indebtedness for) the cost of additional facilities projects.
Sec, 54.6 -16 . Establishment of _ impact Fee _ Board of Review L Appeal
(a) Impact Fee Board of Review.
There is hereby established an Impact Fee Board of Review
("Board") which shall consist of the directors, or their
designees, from the City departments of: Planning; Public
Works; Parks, Recreation and Public Facilities; Building and
Zoning; Fire, Rescue and Inspection Services; General Services
Administration; Solid Waste; and Police. Said board shall be
responsible for hearing the initial appeal by applicants for
building permits ("applicant") aggrieved by decisions of the
Building.and Zoning Department made pursuant to this Chapter.
(b) Appeal Procedures.
After determination by the Building and Zoning Department of
the amount of the development impact fee or credit due, an
aggrieved applicant or any officer, department, board,
commission or agency of the City of Miami (collectively
referred to as City "entities") may request a review of such
fee or credit due *by appealing to the Impact Fee Board of
Review pursuant to the following procedures: The aggrieved
applicant or above authorized City entity shall file a written
Notice of Appeal with the Director of the City's Department of
Building and Zoning within fifteen (15) days following the
rendition of the applicable development impact fee or credit
due. If the Notice of Appeal is accompanied by a bond or
other sufficient surety satisfactory to the City Attorney, in
an amount equal to the applicable development impact fee as
19 -
0426
rJ
calculated by the Building and "'oni.ng Department, the vui.lfling
and Zoning Department shall issue the building permit, T h c
riling of an appeal at rrly point in time: shall not stay the:
collection of the Development i►hpact Fee unloss a bond or
other surety satisfactory to the City Attorney has been filled.
Said Dond or Surety is not required when the appellant is a
unit of government.
(c) Tftx for kPpeals to Iripact Foe Board of Revicy.
An appeal to the 'impact F(re Board of Review shall be made
within fifteen (15) days after rendition of the subject
Building* and Zoning Department Impact Fee invoice by filing a
Notice of Appeal or Letter of Appeal with the Dir(:ctor of the
Department of Building and Zoning stating therein the basis
for such appeal.
(d) Failure to File on Time.
No hearing shall be heard by the Impact Fee Board of Review
unless the respective appeals have been filed within the time
and at tale place, provided in this Chapter.
(e) All Decisions Final.
All decisions of the Impact Fee Board of Review, made under
this Chapter, shall be deemed final unless properly instituted
appeals are filed pursuant to this Chapter.
(f) Disclosure Requirements.
All such requests for review by the City under this Chapter
shall be subject to the disclosure requirements of Section 2-
308, as amended, of the Code of the City of Miami.;
(g) Fee Required for Review.
All requests for review of decisions of the Building and
Zoning Department by the Impact Fee Board of Review shall be
accompanied by a fee of $500.00. The City entities specified
in paragraph (b) of this section shall not be require to pay
said fee.
(h) Notice of Hearing; Scheduling.
The time of the hearing before the Impact Fee Board of Review
shall be no more than forty-five (45) days after receipt of
ti1e Letter
or Notice of Appeal.;
provided,
that the time
limitations
set out in this section
shall not
apply during the
thirty-one
(31) days of the month
of August.
Appeals filed
under this
chapter shall be received
by the
Director of the
Building and Zoning Department at least ten (10)
days prior to
a scheduled
meeting of the Impact
Fee Board
of Review to be
heard at that particular meeting.
Request
for review not
satisfying the provisions of this paragraph shall be heard at
the next subsequently scheduled meetings of the Impact Fee
Board of Review. The Director of the Department of Building
and Zoning shall give the appealing party at least ten (10)
days notice of the time and place of such hearing. The notice
shall be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. No Public
Notice is required.
(1) Hearings; Additional Evidence; and Decision.
At the time and place set for the hearing the Impact Fee Board
of Review shall give the appealing party a reasonable opportu-
nity to be heard. Parties may present additional evidence to
support their position, however no economic or teennleai
reports or studies, real estate appraisals or reports, and/or
written reports of consultants shall be considered by the
Impact Fee Board of Review unless the same shall have been
filed with the Department of Building and Zoning: at least ten
(10) days prior to that hearing. All Exhibits presented to
the Board shall become part of the record and shall remain so
until the expiration of the administrative appeal period or
final judicial determination.
Sec. 54.6-17. City Commission Review.
A decision by the Impact Fee Board of Review shall be final unless
a request for review is filed with the Director of the Department of
Building and Zoning within fifteen (15) days of rendition by that Board,
together with payment of a $500.00 fee. Such request may be filed by the
aggrieved building permit applicant, or by any officer, department,
board, commission or agency of the City of Miami. All such requests for
review by the City Commission shall be subject to the disclosure require--
meats of Section 2-308 of the Code of the City of Miami.. The above
specified City entities shall not be required to pay said fee.
Sec: 511.6-15, Procedures,
The Director of Building and Zoning shall then certify such re-
quests through the Office or the City Manager. Tile procedures set forth
in Section 5.6-16, above, shall also apply to hearings by the City
Commission on Impact Fee appeals.
Sec. 54.6=19. City_ Connis,sion Powers on Review.
The City Commission on review shall have full power to affirm,
reverse, or modify the action of the Impact Fee Board of Review. Said
decision shall be made on the record not more than 45 days after the
request for review by same is made by the aggrieved applicant.
Sec. 54.6-20. Judicial Review.
Any request for review of a decision by the City Commission under
this Chapter shall be made by filing an appeal within 30 days of said
decision with the Circuit Court in accordance with the Florida Rules of
Appellate Procedure.
Sec. 54.6-21. Effect of Impact Fee on Planning, Zonin Subdivision,
and other Reuiations.
This Ordinance shall not effect, in any manner, the permissible use
of property, density of development, design and improvement standards and
requirements or any other aspect of the development of land or provision
of public improvements subject to the City's Comprehensive Plan, zoning
regulations, subdivision regulations, or other regulations of the City,
all of which shall be operative and remain in full force and effect
without limitation with respect to all such development.
Sec. 54.6-22. Impact Fee As Additional and Supplemental Requirement.
The City of Miami Development Impact Fee is additional and supple-
mental to and not in substitution of any other requirements imposed by
the City on the development of land or the issuance of building permits.
It is intended to be consistent with and to further the objectives and
policies of the Comprehensive Plan, the zoning Ordinance, and to be
coordinated with the City's Capital Improvement Program and other City
policies, ordinances and resolutions by which the City seeks to ensure
the provision of public facility improvements in conjunction with the
development of land. In no event shall a property owner be obligated to
�22-
1.0426
pay for the same iroprovement(s) in an amount in excess of the> amount
calculated pursuant to this Chapter; provided, however, that a property
owner, may be required to pay, pursuant to Metropolitan Dade County, State
of Florida, and/or City regulations, for other public facility
improvements in addition to the impact fee -related improvements as
specified herein."
Section 3. All ordinances, code sections, or parts thereof in conflict
herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict.
Section 4. Should any part or provision of this Ordinance be declared by
a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the
validity of the Ordinance as a whole.
Section 5. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble of this
Ordinance are hereby adopted by reference thereto and incorporated herein as if
fully set forth in this Section.
PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this 25th day of
February , 1988.
PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING BY TITLE ONLY this
28th day of April 1988.
ATTEST:.-
XAVIER L. SUAREZ, t R
-Zo— e tz;4�,
MATTY HIRIF
City Clerk
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:
,/ � �a l ,r zl
, 0 L E. MAXWELL
�A sistant City Attorney
JEM/db/ke
APPROVE AS TO FORM AND
CORRECTNESS:
City Attorney
I, Nfiltty lfiroi, ("It— ; of III, , ('it of ' ilmi, I'fur �ti
v of
:�u:! � t't",•i����, � . si:�, ;,r a• �, ;� . t.a ,• 14;.•''i,�es41 l);.,,tr
u-` t°t. I1:Mtii+, �, :n.aitt l� .:rt i i• ., tr _�! t1... �;;_! �: f�i';»`it�k'ii.
,or u;►Liw: a alld 11 "I"i ltt •11's h �t1t'1�i�l;i;, �.aiCl x dl�)�' 10
Itlt pLi'v teri
13
Pt-1
CITY OF `.11AM1. FLORIDA
INTEROFFICE MEMORANOUM
Honorable Mayor and Members 2-ATE -,LE
of the City Commission
suelEc_ City of Miami Development
Impact Fee Ordinance
Second Reading
room Cesar H • Odi O 4EFERENCES
City Manager
ENCLOSURES
RECOMMENDATION:
It is respectfully recommended that the- City Commission adopt the attached
Ordinance repealing an existing impact fee ordinance and establishing a new
impact fee on all new development, exclusive. of City -owned and operated
facilities, single-family residential development, low and moderate income
housing and certain other categories of new development, in order to finance
major public facilities and equipment, the demand for which'is created by such
development.
BACKGROUND:
Following the directions of the City Commission at the meeting of February 25,
1988 the Planning Department has revised the existing Miami Development Impact
Fee Ordinance to exclude City -owned and operated facilities, single-family
_ residential development, low and moderate income housing and certain other
categories of new development.
Impact fees are but one,means of producing revenue for infrastructure improve-
ments in the City. Other means include city bonds, special assessments and
developer exactions. City bonds and special assessments are used to finance
both existing and future infrastructure needs, while impact fees and developer
exactions are used to neet the special and separate needs created by new
development, The Development Impact Fee Ordinance is an attempt to insure
that specifically needed infrastructure would be financed by requiring affect-
ing developments to pay their fair share of the cost for the- particular
infrastructure need they are creating.
In the Spring of 1982, the City of Miami Law Department contracted with the
firm of Freilich & leitner, P.C. (now Herrick, Feinstein), to develop an
impact fee ordinance for the City of Miami, In March 1983, the firm outlined
an Ordinance targeting only that oeveiopment exceeuing gross FAR 1.72. The
Planning Department then prepared the required demographic studies and met
with all appropriate City departments to develop the necessary project cost
data, On May 7, 1086 the Planninq Department presented the resulting Inten.
sive Development Impact Fee )r1inance �o the Commission for first reading, t
the request of the City Commission, the Planning Department, in consultation
Page 1 of 8
04 1C,
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Commission
with the Departments of Finance, Management and Budget, Police, Fire, Rescue
and Inspection Services, Public Works, Parks, Recreation and Public Facili-
ties, General Services Administration.(GSA) and Solid Waste, expanded the
scope of the proposed Impact Fee Ordinance to include all new develop-
ment, with the specific exclusion of City -owned and operated facilities and
single-family residential development.
On July 24, 1986 the City Commission approved a concept outline detailing the
policy decisions involved in this revised Ordinance. During subsequent
meetings between the Planning Department and the departments of Public Works;
Parks, Recreation and Public Facilities; Police; Fire, Rescue and Inspection
Services; Solid Waste; and the General Services Administration; several of
these departments expressed the desire to have City-wide growth projections
upon which to base their capital facility and equipment related needs -for
future growth. These projections were provided to the departments and
attached thereto were questionnaires requesting specific information as to the
departments' future capital infrastructure projects, estimated cost and
location of the projects and justification for inclusion of the projects in
their impact fee -related capital program. The information received from all
of the above mentioned departments pursuant to this questionnaire was incorpo-
rated in the Ordinance and is reflected in the resulting impact fee coeffi-
cients.
On January 22, 1987 the City Commission approved on first,reading the proposed
Impact Fee Ordinance and requested that the Ordinance return for second
reading on March 26, 1987 (meeting date subsequently changed to March 31, 1987
and subsequent to that, April 9, 1987). Because changes made to the Ordi-
nance in the interim were substantial, the Law Department requested that the
Impact Fee Ordinance return to the City Commission for a first reading. On
April 9, 1987, the City Commission again deferred consideration of the Ordi-
nance until .May 14, 1987 pending an adjustment of Solid Waste impact fees,
Police impact fees and the inclusion of General Services Administration impact
fees. On May 14, 1987, the City Commission- approved on first reading the
proposed Impact Fee Ordinance and requested that the Ordinance return for
second reading on May 28, 1987. The Ordinance wa-s adopted on May 28, 1987 and
became effective as of June 28, 1987.
On September 22, 1987 an emergency ordinance was adopted establishing a 30-day
moratorium on the collection of impact fees to provide time for the Planning
Department to consider the Ordinance's impact upon the construction of low and
moderate income multi -family housing and charitable, non-profit development.
The City Commission directed the Planning Department to study the feasibility
of exempting these additional categories of development from payment of impact
fees, On uczoper 22, 19V the moratorium was extended for 90 Jays until
January 28, 1987 in order to give the Planning Department sufficient time to
prepare a revised ordinance, Because a first reading of the ordinance was
deferred Until February 25, 1988, the moratorium was again extended on January
14, 19BB to last until April 30, 1988.
Page 2 of 8
042V
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Commission
The City Commission, furthermore, requested the Planning Department to examine
the possibility of establishing a reasonable "threshold" above which impact
fees would be charged. The Planning Department presently uses a threshold of
200,000 square feet for Major Use Special Permit review. Fees of S.01 per
square foot of new development are assessed under such permits to cover
administrative costs of processing the application. The Planning Department
investigated the possibility of creating a "Minor Use Special Permit" review
for. new developren,.s between 20,000 and 200,000 square feet in size and
setting a permit fee of $1.00 per square foot. The Law Department indicated,
however, that such a fee,. covering more than administrative costs might not
satisfy state statutory requirements under Section 380 for development exac-
tions. By limiting the fee to S.01 per -square foot, the Minor Use Special
Permit review would, however, set special conditions required of the develop-
ment, to satisfy capital infrastructure needs created by that development and
the City Commission would have the opportunity to impose these conditions on
all minor use development.
At the City Commission meeting of February 25, 1988 the City Commission was
presented with a revised impact fee ordinance and a proposal for a minor use
special permit. The Planning staff presented the minor use proposal as one of
several possible alternatives including: (1) exemption of the additional
categories of new development from payment of impact fees, (2) reinstitution
of the original exemptions only, (3) removal of all exemptions, (4) dispensing
with impact fees altogether and/or (5) substitution of the proposed Minor Use
Special Permit review. The Commission was advised by the Planning Department
that implicit in the decision to exempt certain categories of development from
payment of impact fees is a legal obligation upon the City to assume the costs
incurred by the City because of such development. The staff explained that
through the proposed exemptions potential revenues from the impact fee would
decrease by more than 50 percent from what they would have been without any
exemptions, the result being that the costs of these exemptions would have to
be absorbed by other City revenues.
The City Commission thereupon adopted on first reading the proposed impact fee
ordinance with the following exemptions: all single family residential devel-
opment; city owned and/or operated facilities and joint ventures with the
City; low and moderate income housing (defined as duplex and multiple family
housing within the City's Community Development Target Areas and any duplex
and multiple family housing outside the Target Areas certified by the City's
Housing Conservation and Development Agency. as low and/or moderate income);
DRls having an approved Development Order before the effective date of the
Ordinance (excluding the Downtown DRI and the Southeast Overtown/Park West
Areawide ORI), provided that the building permit is obtained within 15 months
of the effective date of this Ordinance; and developments filing complete
building plans, as defined by the City's Zoning Ordinance, as amended, before
the effective date of this Ordinance, providing that the building permit is
obtained within 45 calendar days from the effective date of this Ordinance,
Page 3 of 0 104c,
i
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Commission
Other non -target area and non -low and moderate income duplex and multiple
family residential development, non-profit corporations and charitable organi-
zations were not -to be exempted from payment of impact fees. Also, not to be
exempted from payment of impact fees is the Downtown Miami Development of
Regional Impact and the Southeast Overtown-Park West Areawide Development of
Regional Impact. The attached Ordinance reflects the City Commission's
provisos and was submitted upon second reading at the City Commission meeting
of March. 24, 1988. Without a quorum and on a vote of two in favor s^d two
opposed, the Ordinance was tabled until the April 28, 1988 Commission meeting
at which time it will be reconsidered on second reading. Anticipated impact
fee revenues, before and after exemptions, are shown in the tables on the
following page. -
While Florida courts are generally sympathetic to the philosophy of impact
fees, (i.e., that new development pay its own way) an impact fee ordinance
should conform as closely as possible to the judicial guidelines set forth in
the case law. The following are the minimum requirements for a constitution-
ally valid impact fee:
LEGAL REQUIREMEENTS FOR A VALID IMPACT FEE:
1. Only capital improvements (not services) can be financed by the impact fee;
2. The need for the capital improvement must be demonstrated;
3. The capital improvement must be identified as specifically serving or
benefiting those upon whom the fee will be assessed;
4. The fee must be allocated proportionately among different classes of users
in an equitable, non-discriminatory manner;
5. The capital improvement cannot serve the public -at -large, but must serve
those in a specific geographic area or subarea;
6. The impact fee must be based upon the cost of the capital improvement to be
provided;
7. The total of fees may not exceed the cost of the capital improvement;
8. The funds collected must be specifically "earmarked" for the capital
improvement;
9. The ordinance should specify a time frame for ;he capital improvement to be
provided following payment of the impact fee,
in response to and in addition to the above legal requirements, the City has
made the following poiicy decisions in the development of an ordinance;
Page 4 of 8
.: .042C
2
0
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Commission
POTENTIAL IMPACT FEE REVENUES: 1188
- 2005
1988-90
------------------------------------------------------------
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
$216,810
$570,073
$528,462
$532,480
il,847,825
Dovntovn
7,075,314
7,113,079
61753,604
71240,060
22,1829557
Coconut Grove
436,987
1,387,117
1,045,195
1,310,511
41179,970
Little Havana
460,821
1,270,306
1,002,911
$46,247
3,580,285
F1agali
155,051
455,646
341,071
404,148
1,355,916
Allapattah
406,333
1,018,177
344,081
7839520
3,052,111
Virginia Key
36,268
126,123
0
0
156,391
Total
$8,782,084
$11,940,601
S10,515,324
$11,117,046
$42,355,055
EXEMPTED IMPACT FEE REVENUES: 1988
- 2005
1988-90
1190-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
------------------------------------------------------------
114,944
$151,307
1137,325
$194,431
$498,508
Oovntovn
41486,997
51696,133
3,596,576
31830,059
17,609,765
Coconut Grove
93,850
737,278
461,617
- 649,056
1,941,800
Little Havana
31,454
254,187
189,760
214,354
689,756
Flagabi
27,946
135,638
103,603
142,454
409,642
Allapattah
7,682
202,404
152,291
319,050
631,426
Virginia Key
0
0
0
0
0
Total
14,662,873
17,176,149
$4,641,672
$5,349,404
i21,330,898
ACTUAL ANTICIPATED IMPACT FEE REVENUES: 1988 - 2005
1988.90
1990.95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
5201,366
$410,766
$390,637
$333,049
$1,349,317
00rntoon
2,583,317
1,416,146
3,157, 029
:, 410, 001
10, 572, 792
Coconut Grove
343,137
649,919
533,573
^61,535
041t Havana
429,367
1,016,119
313,151
631,893
2,390,529
Flagaes
127,105
1120,003
137,468
;61,614
146,2$4
Allapattah
398,651
$15, 773
591,190
464,470
, 370, 685
')irginia Key
30,263
Toti l 14,119, 211 14, 763, 662 15, 873, 65Z 15, 767, 642 RQ, 524,157
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Commission
CITY OF MIAMI POLICY DECISIONS:
1. The fee would apply to all new development in the City, excluding single
family residential development and City owned and operated facilities,
which results in a net increase in either the number of residential
dwelling units, or square footage in either residential or non-residential
in excess of 1000 square feet. County and State agencies are not exclud-
ed. In addition, the fee would neither apply to arty dupl cx or MRU I . i pl e
family residential development located in the City's designated Community
Development Target Areas nor to duplex or multiple family' residential
development, outside of the Target Areas, which is certified by the
City of Miami Housing Conservation and Development Agency as low and/or
moderate income housing. Also exempt are non-profit, joint ventures with
the City, developments using City owned land, and City owned and/or
operated facilities.
2. Grandfathered in under the Ordinance and thus exempt from payment of
impact fees are: (1) developments filing complete building plans, as
defined by the City's Zoning Ordinance, as amended, before the effective
date of the Ordinance, providing that the building permit is obtained
within 45 calendar days from the effective date of the Ordinance; and (2)
Developments of Regional Impact (DRIB), specifically excluding the Down-
town Miami Development of DRI and the Southeast Overtown-Park West DRI,
for which a Development Order has been approved by the City before the
effective date of the Ordinance, providing that the building permit is
obtained within 15 months of the effective date of this Ordinance.
3. Fees would be determined for only two (2) land use categories - residen-
tial and non-residential. Even when non-residential will include all
different types of this use, it will 'not be broken down into subcategories
of retail, office, etc.
4. The City would be divided into distinct geographic areas ( initially, the
seven Planning Districts) in order that provided capital improvements
reasonably relate to new development in that geographic area and thereby
rt meet the legal requirement of a rational nexus test.
5. The amount of the fee could differ across the different designated areas
of the City to reflect different capital needs in each district and the
associated cost of meeting those needs,
6, The amount of the fee would be determined by estimating the cost of
providing capital improvements to new development through the year 2005,
of the following types; street improvements, storm sewer improvements,
parks and recreation facilities, fire -rescue facilities and equipment,
police facilities and equipment, solid waste collection facilities and
equipment, and other general government capital improvements.
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Commission
7. Capital improvement costs would be determined by applying relevant stan-
dards and cost estimates. Costs could be based on specific capital im-
provements programmed to accommodate projected future growth in specific
areas.
8. An "existing needs assessment" would not be made. All existing and
already programmed facilities in all areas are satisfying existing needs,
and impact fee -funded improvements benefit additional growth only.
Existing standards would serve as impact fee standards.
9. Any fees to be charged by the City to finance State and County -owned and
provided capital improvements and facilities would need to be submitted by
these entities and need to be acceptable to the City.
10. The fee in its entirety would be charged at the time of building permit
issuance and kept in escrow for the financing of programmed capital im-
provements.
11. Fees collected would go into special capital improvements funds set up for
impact -fee-related capital improvements for each specific geographic area.
12. The assessment of an impact fee on a development does not preclude the
possibility of additional assessments for a development -specific located
facility or for capital improvement needs not included in the impact fee -
supported Capital Improvement Program; at the same time developments must
not be charged separately for facilities or capital improvements already
covered in the impact fee -supported Capital Improvement Program.
13. Developers. would be allowed credits, off -setting a portion or all of the
assessed fee, for providing improvements to infrastructure or providing
facilities in the geographic area serving the purposes specifically
intended by the Impact Fee Ordinance.
14. After the City's determination of the amount of the development impact fee
or credit due, an applicant may request a review of such fee.
15. The City shall annually, in conjunction with the annual capital -budget and
capital improvements program adoption process, review Impact Fee Ordinance
procedures, assumptions, formulas, zone designations and fee -assessments
and make such modifications as are deemed necessary.
16. An administrative fee in the amount of three percent•(3%) of the impact
fee due would be imposed, payable at the time of application for building
permit,
17, Using the proceeds of the impact fees, the City may issue bonds, revenue
certificates and other obligations of indebtedness in such manner and
subject to such limitations as may be provided by low,
l8, In the event that a fee collected has not been spent or encumbered by the
end of the calendar quarter immediately following six (6') years from the
Page 7 of 8
1 042
CITY OF MIAM1. FLORIOA
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANOUM
Cesar H. Odio :ATE April 18, 1988 r._E
City Manager
3UBJEC_ City of Miami 9eve1 opment
Impact Fee Ordinance
r40M �'• i C4 , ?.EFERENCES
Join ph `CAI. McManus, Assistant Director
Planning Department
S NCLv SUf7E5
Attached for inclusion on the* April 28, 1988 City Commission Meeting Agenda is
the City of Miami Development Impact Fee Ordinance.
SR/ADW/KC/kc
cc: Law Department
Approved By:
Sao
o riguez
s s nt City Manager
X04 P.
1046
Elm
:71
..... .z
0v wit I Quo .olil�s
III
mobilraw it Imam, .:1a MO11111MUIX4m
and to
On m
... Iiln � � ocie� am
1��. Rae In=
1 mobil" on
Pw—i 11�.� i tors
wwllrl■ar Rs■ I� I �I�r�,.� .=�7:� 7ir�
w.•r■pw�w��
■sFilling
®�11E:
_
sma
IRIRR=
«
DEVELOPMENT,
��
ITARGET
E
.■r
m
1
mmm■oill
■mowiir
•'e'
now .
CODE
NOWBORHOOD
.RNam3
,
Ill
LIFTIL RIVER
s
mom
o
ff-
1■.r
F-
;WINE■
■I■
•.R�
�
I��
i e
w
iiiies
i
���
_
Y
`
�
•soon
■■
■■■■
�■�i�
w..■�
�i.■lii~�
11aR.■■�w
�w�
r
!rLl3l��
\\awo>�Rs�lit
OCCUR PEAK
-�Ill
MTN PICNIC IUMOS
11
i
PLANNING DISTRICT
. N.W. 29 ST.
AVAINNOOD
N.W. 20 ST 11 ► —
> _ o
3
N.W. 14 ST.
N.W. 6 S .
6
N �
FLAGLER ST.
S.W. S ST. — CL UGHION i
a-=JIIIIA fill ILE CSWY
ISLAND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
TARGET AREA
CODE
NEIOIISONHOOD
2V
DMEVAID
20
EOUVAIiR
pia
251 .
OvI llom
i-
252
SP1146 6AWKS
261
[[rIAAI ROrMIOmt
264
Unwis PARR
291
111E)ill 1ESI
J�
292
I111CUL 801111
211
OIAMI AKIrE
HICKENSACKER CSWY
v�1�♦tv
m
/Aalla1SW06to
296
VAISM IS0110
OP�G
292
1`011 Of AIAIII
bi mi
21b 30.
4K 49
49
31i
46 3i
CMAL WAY &W. 22
T.
sum w &W. 40 ST.
POINCIANA AVE.
fli3s
HARDU AVE—
]A�]
ED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
TARGET AREA
CODE NEIGHBORIJOOD
131
11SI 6104
191
UWAS PAN
III
SItKt KIFF
"I
somill Om
194
(AS[ 6W4
SIS
Soul" 611m
1%
Elftf MOVIE ISIANS
D
11
PLANNING DISTRICT p
N.W. I ST.
yr. s
x
—
a
ar9
W. FI.ADLEB ST.
r..
r
a
S.W..a lT .
,..
P: .
...
....
t.
.r
•,
S.W. is ST.
£
�
v
{
•� �,��� •• ,
.
���T-ZI
_
{7
_
_ ate• ,�
CORAL WAY +1.W.22ST.
_
—
,,�
� i%•+
- LEGEND
<
EMS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
TARGET AREA
dCODE
NEIO118011000
-"
Yil 11Si Cliffs CA9si.
oil Alit elms
_
1
411 word IASI tlltit HAV"A
. !
491 At1ulACNE
'�yjr
CAW CAI(
99r SxEWi00W
-L
'
III :
l/l LAST Cn tAD9E
m -Dort tn K
m 'imisre tAIK
-It
119 MM Aril KMIit.
19IA11t
-.
lis -.119161E
'
iIf tU19 X1141111
'
77C IAst RIBA M6u
i
PLANNING DISTRICT E
s
N.W. /1 S T.
s
�J U U
N.W. 7 9T.
ui
FLAMER ST.
S.W. a ST. < >
A
bi ; 3
` t LEGEND
CODE NEIOH80RHOOD
� S91 MSf flw.ml
SM FAMIA•At
S!! 914(a P419
S!� UXUIE Gumns
0
PLANNING DISTRICT
F
�.
;
;...
AIRPORT EXPRESSWAY.
=
".
...
N.W. 2li St.'
ri N.W. 2S ST
..
MUA
3
«..
...
..
M.W. 20 ST.7.
y1r
_
_
_
'��'
ifr
Y•�
M.W. it ST.
s.
LEGEND
C06YiUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
TARGET
f
AREA
4►
;
1
--�
•^:. S
$
'�i� '
31
CODE NEIGHBORHOOD
"
M.W. 7 iT.
Ql f[Mp tUb -
ill tontoct
-
: Rt CfE..
.14 WHO tag
.
ti5 CIVIC OWN
i91 will 694MI MB 0116"%
692 will *kill FAW
..�
611 :':. Wtll MMIG M144 "
691 S olll t14CSC ►S[[
695 SmtOU10ftWAIVAIS
O
LEGEND
CODE NEIaHBORIiOOD
171 V116111A try
SECTION I - CITY DEN002APHICS
Projected Increase in Residential
Poouiat:on:
1988-90■
-----------------------------------------------------------
1990-95
IM-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
56
419
471
663
10609
Downtown
5,599
7,146
3,375
3,810
30,010
Coconut Grove
252
11888
19257
11768
51165
Little Havana
140
1,049
795
884
2,858
Flagal:
84
420
314
442
1,260
Allaoattah
28
420
314
663
1,425
Virginia Key
0
------------------------------------------------------------
0
0
0
0
Total
6,159
11,342
11,516
13,310
42,327
Projected Increase in Total Gveiling UnitsAA
1988-90 1990-95 1995-2000 2000-05 TOTAL
------------------------------------------------------------
Edison 22 168 188 265 643
Dovntom 31111 3,970 41653 4,939 16,673
Coconut Grove 126 944 628 884 2,582
Little Havana 56 420 314 354 1,144
Flaga�: 34 166 126 174 500
Allapattah 11 169 126 268 574
Virginia Key 0 0 0 6 0
--------------------------------------------------------
Total 3,360 5,837 61035 6,884 22,116
Projected Increase in Total Residential Square Footage;
(at 1,200 square feet per avelling unit)
1968-90 1990-95 1995-2000 2000-05 TOTAL
-
Edison 26,400 201,600 225,600 318,000 771,600
Downtown 31733,200 4,764,000 ,583,600 5,926,800 20,007,600
Coconut Grove 151,200 191329800 753,600 1,060,800 3,098,400
Little Havana 67,200 504,000 376,800 424,800 1,372,800
Flagaei 40,800 199,200 151,200 208180Q 6109040
Allapattah 13,200 202,800 151,200 321,600 6889809
Virginia Key 0 0 0 0 0
Total 4,032,000 '1004,400 7,242,000 8,260,800 26,539,200
v 1988.90 projections are for the period April 1, 1988 through Aargn 31, 1990 Only,
"Itsldentlal population to Wiling units conversions art as Follovf:
Downtown; 14 persons per gweil.irn0 unit
Coconut Groves a,0 persona per 4pelling vn:t
All Other Districts; ,5 persons per arelling unit
1 42
j
Mew 2esidential Units
Projected Increase in Single Fasily Residential Units:
1988-90 1990-95 11995-2000 MO -05 `OTAL
-----------------------------------------------------
Edison 3 26 28 40 97
Downtown 0 0 0 0 0
Coconut Grove 32 236 157 221 646
Little Havana 6 42 31 36 115
Flagaai 7 33 26 35 101
Allapatt-ah 1 17 12 27 57
Virginia Key 0 0 0 0 0
-------------------------------------------------•---
Total 49 354 254 359 1,016
Projected Increase in Duplex Residential Units:
1988-90 1990-95 1995-2000 2000-05 TOTAL
Edison 6 42 47 66 161
Downtown 0 0 0 0 0
Coconut Grove 32 236 157 221 646
Little Havana 17 126 94 106 343
F.1gas1 7 33 26 35 101
Allapattah 4 67 51_ 116 223
Virginia Key 0 0 0 0 0
Total 66 504 375 534 1,479
Projected Increase in Multi-Fasily Residential Units:
1988-90 1990-95 1995-2000 2000-05 TOTAL
Edison 13 100 113 159 385
Downtown 3,111 3,970 4,653 4,939 16,673
Coconut Grove 62 472 314 442 11290
Little Havana 33 252 189 212 686'
Flagaiiii 20 100 74 104 298
Allapattah 6 85 63 135 289
Virginia Key 0 0 0 0 0
Total 3,245 41979 5,406 51991 19,621
Projected Increase in Total Residential Units;
1988-90 1990-95 1995-2000 2000-05 TOTAL
..wf!}!}...!
Edison 22 168 lab 265 643
Downtown 31111 39970 49653 41939 16,673
Coconut Grove 126 944 628 864 21582
Little Havana 56 4Z0 314 354 1,144
F 1 aga�a 34 166 IN 174 500
atlapaFtah 11 169 126 R68 S74
Virginia +coy 0 0 0 1 0
•w►l+ewwwrwwwi+.wwwewewwswwwlwel:eewwwwwww:wwwwswwwssww
Total 3,360 5,831 035 6,884 12,116
10426
i
t
Hew Residential Some Footage
Projected Increase
:n Single FaW Y Residential
Square Footage:
1988.40 1910-95 1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
-----------------------------------------------------------
31600
31,200
33,600
48,000
1169400
Dovntown
0
0
0
0
1
Coconut Grove
32,400
283,200
188,440
265,200
775,200
Little Havana
71200
S01400
37,200
43,200
138,000
flags i
81400
39,600
31,206
42,000
121,200
Allapattah
1,200
20,400
14,400
32,400
68,400
Virginia Key
1
1
1
1
1
Total
58,800
424,800
30 4,806
430,800
1,219,200
Projected Increase
in Duplex Residential
Square Footage:
1988-90
1990-95 1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL.
Edison
7,200
50,400
-56,400
'9,200
113,200
Dovntom
0
0
0
0
0
Coconut.Grove
38,400
293,200
188,400
265,200
?75,200
Little Havana
20,400
151,200
112,800
127,200
411,6u0
flaga�:
8,400
39,600
31,200
42,000
121,200
A1lapactah
4,800
30,400
6 1, 200
127,200
273,660
Virginia Key
0,
0
0
_.,, 0
0
Total
-----------------------------------------------------------
79,200
604,800
454,000
641,800
1,774,800
Projected Increase
in Multi -Family Residential
Square Footage:
1968-90
1990-95 1995-2000
2000-05
-----------------
TOTAL
Edison
-----------------------------
15,600
120,000
135,600
110,808
462,000
Dovntovn
3,733,200
4,764,040
5,583,600
5,926,300
20,007,600
Coconut Grove
74,400
566,400
376,800
530,400
11548,000
Little Havana
39,600
302,400
2261,800
254,400
$239200
Flaga�:
24,000
120,001
08,800
124,800
157,600
Allapattah.
7,200
102,000
759600
162,000
146,800
Virginia Key
1
0
1
0
0
Total
31894,000
5,974,000
6,467,200
71189,200
23,545,200
Projected Increase in Total Residential Sgwt Footages
1908-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2000 -05
TOTAL
♦R#l�+wrwwewww#w+wo.ww+wwwP•www�.+www ww+:w eT+ww ww ww�r
...........
Edison
26,401
201,600
225,600
318,000
1171160Q
?90ntoyn
3,733,200
4,764,000
1,583,600
5,926,000
e0,007,600
Coconut Grove
151,200
1113001
753,600
1,0601000
3,010,400
little Havana
67,200
50l,000
376,800
424,800
1,372,800
Flagali
41,800
199,200
151,901
208,000
000,000
pllapactan
13,200
402400
151120Q
'.21,600
008,600
Virgin)# Key
0
0
0
0
0
'
•#wpR}##w#RwRw#R+#RRR'fR##R##/!�#fRRRRwRR+#ww#R Rw wRwwwRRRwRww
Total
410324000
1,001,400
7419,000
01260,800
26,539400
104 �'
<M
Projected Increase in Total Eiployeent:
3ffite Esolovient
t'?88-?0
1910-95
1115-2000
2000.05
70TAL
Edison
y - 95r
150
115
126
486
Dovntovn
71294
71120
61462
4,723
25,599
Coconut Grove
346
738
648
442
29014
Little Havana
656
19396
11154
764
3,170
FTagasi
113
2l5
170
110
648
Ailapattah
715
11518
11241
823
4,296
Virginia Key
133
0
0
0
133
lotil
9,352
11,137
90749
6,948
37,186
Retail Eiployeent
1989-90
1910-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
------ .139
- 307
2 64
215
?25
Dovntown
3,241
31360
2,512
21451
11,564
Coconut Grove
243
592
443
365
1,643
Little Havana
S30
1,535
1,146
148
4,251
FTagaai '
79
170
146
111
$13
Allapattah
134
293
253
206
886
Virginia Key
46
604
__ 0
0
650
total
4,511
6,861
4,764
40304
20,440
Yholesale Eiployeent
1988-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
------------------------------------------------------------
141
307
244
187
879
Dovntom
292
611
487
371
1,;51
Coconut Grove
13
41
32
24
115
Little Havana
101
211
176
133
629
Flagaii
27
58
47
36
163
Allapattan
148
321
255
194
918
Virginia Key
0
0
0
0
0
lotai
717
1,557
1,241
345
4,460
Manufacturing Eiployeent
1988490
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
-- w------------------ erww..-w.........--w
Edison
119
264
254
198
$35
Pomtom
332
736
705
550
21323
Coconut Grove
27
59
:8
44
188
Little Havana
1'6
279
268
:08
181
Fligaa
A
:4
54
42
178
Allipittah
163
361
347
2PQ
11141
Virgino Key
13
0
1
0
0
a
Aiscellaneous Esploysent
1988-90
------------
1990-95
--------------------------------
1195-2000
2000-05
-----------------
TOTAL
Edison
252
416
331
197
1,196
Downtown
1,989
4,455
3,686
2,201
12,431
Coconut Grove
432
892
699
450
2,473
Little Havana
745
1,545
1,219
785
41294
Flagari
180
325
271
174
950
Ailapattah
912
19933
19507
996
5,348
Virginia Key
0
O
0
0
0
Total
41510
91566
70113
41913
26,692
Projected Increase in Total Non -Residential Square Footagewl
1988-90
-------------------------------------------------------------
1990-95
1195-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
202,123
427,702
364,788
295,223
1,289,836
Downtown
3,292,531
2,766,377
2,104,734
2,330,141
10,493,783
Coconut Grove
247,1.21
267,267
280,305
263,175
1,057,868
Little Havana
499,717
1,133,249
110,344
687,357
3,231,166
Flagau
82,841
171,326
129,782
123,679
507,123 -
Allapattah
193,789
349,354
'17,552
520,168
2,480,863
Virginia Key
60,000
250,000
0
0
310,000
Total
4,778,122
5,865,774
4,507,005
4,219,743
19,370,644
Projected Increase in Total (Residential
and Non -Residential)
Square FootageA:
1999-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-15
TOTAL
Edison
-------------------------------------------------------------
229,003
628,822
5919868
613,463
2,062,156
Downtown
7,025,198
. 7,530,377 -
7,688,067
3,2561808
30,500,450
Coconut Grove
398,321,
1,400,067
1,034,505
1,323,975
4,156,868
Little Havana
5661917
1,636,768
1,297,644
1,111,677
4,603,006
Flaga�i
123,161
373,426
279,502
335,839
1,1119928
Allapattah
407,229
1,050,954
868,272
838,418
39164,863
Virginia Key
60,000
250,000
0
0
310,000
Total
3,809,829
12,370,414 ,11,748,858
129480,170
45,909,271
Esploysent to non-residential
square footage conversions
are as
follows;
'3ffice Elploysent; 250 square
feet per elpi0Vee
Wail Elploylent; 300 square
feet Der eopioyee
'4holesale Esploysent; $00 square feet per etployee
ilanufacturing Esploysent; 400
squire felt per sepipyee
his;p1lantous Esploystnti w100
square feel; per esployee
(Source; Planning Oepartitm, Gity
of Aim, 1988)
q
1,426
0
Miscellaneous Erployrent
1988-90
1990-95
1995-2000
• 2000-05
TOTAL
-------------------------------------------------------------
Edison
252
416
331
197
1,196
Downtown
1,989
41455
39686
2,301
12,431
Coconut Grove
432
892
619
450
2,473
Little Havana
i45
11545
1,219
785
. 4,294
Flagari
lea
325
271
174
950
AlIapattah
912
1,133
1,507
.996
51348
Virginia Key
0
0
0
0
0
Total
4,510
91566
1,713
41913
26,692
Projected Increase in Total Non -Residential Square FootaaeA;
i188-90
-------------------------------------------------------------
1990-95
1195-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
202,123
427,702
364,788
295,223
11289,836
Downtown
3,292.531
2,766,377
2,104,734
2,330,141
10,493,,783
Coconut Grove
247,121
267,267
280,305
263,175
1,057,868
Little Havana
499,717•
1,133,248
910,844
687,357
3,231,166
Flagm
82,841
171,316
128,782
123,679
507,123-
Allapattah
393,789
349,354
,'17,552
520,168
2,480,863
Virginia Key
60,000
250,000
0
0
310,000
Total
4,778,122
5,865,774
4,507,005
4,219,743
19,370,644
Projected Increase in Total (Residential
and Hon -Residential)
Square Footage:
1988-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
-------------------------------------------------------------
229,003
628,822
591,868
613,463
2,062,156
Downtown
7,025,198
7,530,377
7,688,067
3,256,808
30,500,450
Coconut Gme
398,321.
1,400,067
11034,505
1,323,975
4,156,868
Little Havana
566,117
11636,768
11287,644
1,111,677
41663,006
Flagasi
123,161
373,426
279,502
3359839
1,1111928
Allapattah
407,229
1,050,954
8b8,272
838,418
3,164,863
Virginia Key
60,000
250,000
0
0
310,000
Total
$9809,829
12,870,414
11,748,858
1214809170
45,109,271
Esploysent to non-residential
:quire footage conversions are as
follows:
Office Esploysents 250 square
feet per eeoloyee
ketall Eiployetnt: 300 squire
feet per eeployee
Aclesale Esploysent: $00 square feet per eeployee
aanufatturing Eeploysenti 400
square feet per eeployee
Miscellaneous Esploytenti 211110
square feet per eeployee
(Source: Planning Depirtsent, Gity
of Aim, 1969)
Nev Non -Residential Square Footage
Projected
Increase in Office Square Footage:
I988.90
1390-95
1995-2000
2000-05
70TAL
..
Edison
----- ------------
26,079
y----
41,382
------------
31,708
----•............
34,303
-i
133,472
Oovntovn
2,3739600
11588,347
10222,184
1,263,361
61447,412
Coconut Grove
141,305
101,277
909995
1109165
4439742
Little Havana
180,585
383,488
317,144
209,847
11491,864
F1agasi
31,009
591186
30,992
469129
1679316
Allapattah
1969713
417,274
341,132
226,698
11181,807
Virginia Key
46,000
0
0
O
40,400
Total
21989,211
2,590,954
2,034,955
1,810,493
?,S05,693
Projected
Increase in Retail Square Footage:
1988-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-15
TOTAL
Edison
45,936
101,310
87,120
701950
305,316
0oontoon
724,755
1,050,525
304,500
620.730
2,700,510
Coconut Grove
33,904
117,480
146,190
120,450
468,024
Little Nawna
209,032
506,550
378,180
312,840
1,405,602
Flagaw
25,608
56,100
48,130
399270
169,158
Allapattah
44,088
96,690
$3,490
67,980
292,248
Virginia Key
20,000
2509000•
0
0
270,000
Total
1,152,323
2,1789655
1,047,660
1,232,220
5,6101858
Projected
Increase in Wholesale Square Footage:
1988-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
77,660
168,850
134,200
102,350
483,560
Oomtom
161,920
121,425
267,850
204,050
755,245
Coconut Grove
109120
22,550
171600
13,200
63,474
Little Havana
55,660
120,450
96,800
73,150
346,060
Flagami
149960
31,900
25,850
19,800
92,510
Allapattah
91,180
1769550
140,250
106,700
504,680
Virginia Key
0
0
0
0
0
Total
401,500
641,725
682,550
519,750
2,245,525
Projected
Increase in Manufacturing Square Footage:
1988.90
1990-95
1995-2010
2000.15
TOTAL
Edison
--- .,--,..........................�..
52,448 116,160 I l 1, 760 37,120
367,488
00rntown
32,256
61080
110,200
;42,OOb
190,536
Coconut Grove
11179Z
251960
25,520
19,360
32,632
l i ttl a Havana
55,440
122,760
117,920
41,520
387, 610
FliA6ei
11,264
24,640
23,760
10,460
76,144
Allapattah
71,808
158,840
152,680
118,800
5021128
Virginia Key
0
0
0
0
0
Total
235, 008
454,440
741, 840
E77,2S0
+, 008, 568
10426
Projected Inctease in Total Non -Residential Square Footages
1988-90
1990-95 1995.2000
2000.45
TOTAL
Edison
U102,123
427,702
i64,788
245,223
1,239,836
Dovntovn
3,2929531
2,766,277
2,104,734
2,330,141
10,493,783
Coconut Grove
247,121
267,267
280,305
263,175
1,057,868
Little Havana
499,717
1,133,248
1109844
687,357
3,231,166
Flagasi
82,841
171,826
128,782
1239679
507,129
Allapattah
393,789
849,354
717,552
520,168
2,480,963
Uirginia Key
60,000
250,000
0
0
310,000
Total
4,778,122
5,865,774
4,517,005
4,219,743
19,370,644
SECTION 2 - CITY STANDARDS
POLICE STANDARDS:
Surveys indicate the distribution of calls for service are approxiiiately $6.5% From commercial
establishments and IM% from residential units.
lies Personnel:
3 shorn personnel per 1000 residents
1 civilian employee per 2 sworn persoroul
Facilities/Equipment: Acquisition Cost
----------------
1 860 ahz portable radio per 3 sworn personnel 13,000 each
1 Wile digital terminal per 3 worn personnel $59480 each
2 parking spaces per 3 sworn personnel $10,000 per space
I parking space per 2 civilian employees 110,000 per space
130 square feet of building space per civilian employee 175.00 per square Foot
65 square feet of building space per worn personnel f75.00 per square foot
(Source: Police Department, City of Miami, 1996)
FIRE/RESCUE STANDARDS:
---------------------- Acquisition Cost
--------------
Emergency Rescue Unit 1 per 50,000 persons 193,010 each
Hazardous Materials Foam Apparatus 1 per 145,030 persons $300,000 each
Aerial Fire Apparatus and Rescue Equipment 1 per 71,301 persons 1500,000each
(Source: Fire, Rescue and Inspection Services Department, City of Miami, 1986)
RESIDENTIAL PARK STANDARDSs
Mini Park: Residential Tot lot/Play Area, Urban Open Space
Standards 0.1 acre per 1000 people
Average Sizes 1/4 to 1 acre
Copulation Served= 500 to 2,500
Service Areas 1/4 mile or less Community Park:
Neighborhood Park: Standards 1.0 acre per 1000 people
Average $ixes 20 acres
Standards 0.5 acre per 1000 people Site Ranges 5 to 50 acres
Average Sites 4 acres Population Strytos 8,000 to 25,000
Site Ranges 3 to 20 acres Service Area: 1/2 to 2 silts
Population Servtos 11500 to 40000
Service Areas 1/2 tilt
3-
0
Acreage Requirement
Renovation Costs
Mini Park
0,1
acre per 1000 persons
$4.00
per
square foot
4eighborhood Park
1.5
acres per 1000 oersons
$2.00
per
square foot
Community Park
1,0
acre per 1000 persons
$1.00
per
square foot
----------------------.._..-----------------------
Total Residential Heed
1.6
----------------
acres per 1000 persons
$1.50
av ,
g
er square foot
per square
Source: Department of Parks, Recreation and Public facilities, City of Mimi, 1987.
STREET AND STORM SEVERS STANDARDS:
- Average life expectancy of nevly constructed typical citu ctr.ok with ctnr. SON-S .is 64 ears.
Approximately lie miles of city streets exist in each planning district (except Uirginia Key).
Cost of streets and storm severs is $150.00 per linear foot for all planning districts except Dovntovn
for vhich the cost of street/storm sever construction is estimated at MOM per linear foot.
Average non -assessable cost for constructing a typical city street including storm severs is 83 percent
of the total cost.
Storm sever costs for construction of a typical street in the city are approximately one-third of the
total cost. '
Per square foot costs of streets/storm severs do not differ vith respect to residential or non-residential
deuetopent.
(Source: Public Yorks Department, City of Miami, 1986)
SOLID PASTE STAHDARDSs
---------------------
Residential Yaste Generations
3 tons generated per nousenold per year
P i ck-ttp Days;
residential pick-ups assumed at 208 times per year
commercial pick-ups assumed at 260 times per year
Hon -Residential Waste Generation:
Office; 1 lb. per 100 sq. ft. per day
Retail; 6 ib, per 100 sq. ft. per day
Wholesales 6 lb, per 100 sq. ft, Per day
Manufacturings 2 lb. Per 100 sq. ft. per bay
Assumes a cityvioe average of 3 lb, per 100 sq-ft.. per 04Y
(sources Solid Paste Departaent, City of Miami, 19870
Carrying Capacities:
Garbage truck: 12 tons per load; 2 loads per day
Trasn Truck: 7 tons per load; 3 loads per day
Self -Contained Roll On/Roll Offs (non-residential
pickups only) 1 10/10 per 2 trash or garbage trucks
Tractor vith Hoist: (non-residential pickups only)
1 tractor per 2 trash or garbage trucks
Cranes I crane per 2 trash trucks
Equipment Costs:
Garbage truck; 5100,000
Trasn Truck; 160,008
Cranes $130,000
Tractor; 1120,000
Self -Contained Roll On/Rplt Off: $10,000
14
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRAtI0N
Solid Mist! Cohoonehts
Heavy Equipment Standards:
Costs of Required Additional Arta:
One 420 square foot parking space for every additional
Parking Areas - 28,967 square feet
piece of heavy equipment;
162.50 per square foot
One additional heavy equipment mechanic for every 30
-------- r_______►___�
pieces of heavy equipment;
f1,810,113
750 square feet of working bay space for every new heavy
equipment mechanic added;
York Bay Area - 51,410 square feet
One employee parking space (160 square feet in size) for
11"D per square foot
every two new heavy equipment mechanics.
_-____---_______________
17,196,000.
Police Components
light Equipment Standards:
Costs of Required Additional Area:
2.5 sworn officers per vehicle (at a cost of $12,000);
Parking Areas - 160 square feet
One light vehicle equipment mechanic per 47 new cars;
162.50 per square foot
,35 square feet of working bay space for every new light
__________ __ -----------
vehicle equipment mechanic added;
-11,000
One employee parking space (160 square feet in size) for
every two new light vehicle equipment mechanics;
York Bay Area - 285 square feet
One 160 square foot parking space for every additional
$140 per square foot
vehicle.
� f39,900
_
(Sources General Services Administration, City of Miami,
1987.)
Q 10
SECTION 3 - CALCULATION OF COSTS FOR NEV FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT
4b
CALCULATION OF POLICE i"PACT FEE COEFFICIENTS
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
1907
Nptessary
impact Fee
4etessary
Impact Fee
Total impact
Coact
Existing
Sworn
Sworn
Civilian
Civilian
Fee Police
Fee
Residential
Personnel'
Police
Personnel'
Polite
Cost'm
Areas
Population
(at 3/1000)
Cosh'
(b x 1/2)
Costa'
(b f d)
-------------------------------------__-__-----------.�._------
EDISON
83,488
250
f3,S98,750
--------•-
125
7118 47_�r-•-___--;._
f1,847,112
f5,445,922
0007OYH
43,859
132
11892,266
66
9719265
2,863,532
COCONUT GROVE
36,129
108
11557,217
54
799,332
213369629
LITTLE HAVANA
112,508
338
418499657
169
21489,241
71338,897
FLAGAMI
439695
131
19883,473
66
966,752
2185OV225
ALLAPATTAH
61,288
184
2,6410819
92
It355,997
39997,816
VIRGIHIA KEY
0
0
0
0
0
0
----------------
.ITYYIDE
--------
381,006
------- ------------
11143
--------------------------------
116,423,264
572
----------------;-•-
18,429,753
$24 853' 621
(q)
(h)
M
(j)
(k)
(1)
Presumed
Presumed
Total
Total
Residential
Hon -Residential
Impact
Residential
Hon4es idential
Actual
Actual
Police
Police
Fee
Police
Police
Residential
Hon -Residential
Impact Feexxx
lmpact Feexxxx
Areas
Cost'x'
Costxx'
Square Footage
Square Footage
(9/ 0
Wit)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EUISON
f735,200
f4,110,723
34,591,680
9,504,207
30.019
f0.283
OOYNTOYN
326,577
2,476,955
34,263,840
331003,319
0.014
0.283
tOCONUT GROVE
318,145
2t038,484
21,288,480
4,842,722
0.017
0.283
LITTLE HAVANA
990,751
613489146
48,075,600
12,527,755
0.019
0.283
FLAGAMI
384,780
29465,444
20,459,520
3,527,277
1.019
0.283
ALLAPATTAH
531,715
31458,111
25,020,240
12,640,271
0.Gt9
0.283
VIRGIHIA KEY
0
0
0
0
0.100
0.283
---------------------
CITYYFDE
-•--------------
f3,35S,158
--------•---•--------•----------•---•----------------------------
f21,497,863
183,105,360.
16,045,551
f0.018
f0.283
A At 3 sworn personnel
per 1,000
persons and l civilian personnel per 2 sworn personnel.
rx Cost per sworn personnel:
Radios 0 per 3 Sworn at $3,000 each)
Mobile Digital Terminal System (1 per 3 Sworn at $% 480 each)
Parking (2 sDaces per 3 Sworn at $10,000 each)
Building Expansion (65 square feet per sworn at $75 per square foot)
Cost per civilian personnel:
Parking (t space per 2 civilian personnel at 110,000 each)
Building Expansion (130 square feet per civilian at 175 per square foot)
xmN Existing non-residential cost is approximately 06.5% of total Police cost and
residential cost is approxisa ly 13.5% of total Police cost,
wx"City totals from columns g and i, and h and k, were used to determine the
coefficients for all the lawt Fee Areas. Adaustments were We to account for
future residential deaogropnic difference; between Downtown, Coconut Grove and
other areas as follows:
Presumed
Residential
Area of
Total Residential
Persons Per
Adjusted
Res. P91i4e,
Police impact
the City
Square Footage
Hov;enold
Square Footage
Costs
Fee
..eR'e4eReR!lRTRwRwRRelw.e
ew w•e'weRRtRRww RA wRRRewlR♦ewf
RRRRee seRlR4rwers lwelrwRwwwww.eeRsweeewRw+wR
Downtown
34, 263, 810
1.8
316014 $1P
43861577
0,014
Comt Grovt
21, 286, 680
31 ,14;j
Rest of City
12@0153,Qd!
,D
13806039116
2,650�436
0.11R
w�R1!lRReRA1RTwRtf*RRtteRRlRR+RIR�Ivl1tR7.MCRRRRPliR1Re1R�aTRfT�RlfRwIRRIwIIRRRR1RRf.aq.!#tRR.R#r!�ll�AiRRntt RRA! ...
,.. Citl+ri�e
189,705,�60
RR,.
Ig3,1Q5,9b0
;3w�S,158
N^
WU
CALCULATION OF POLICE COSTS
(1988-2005)
(a)
(n)
(o)
(p)
(q)
1988-2005
Nwber
Residential
Residential
lapact
Husber of
of New
New
Police
Police
Fee
Nov
New
Residential
lapact Fee
Casts
Areas
Residents
Units
Sq. Ft.
(per sq. ft.)
(o x p)
-------
EDISON
-------------------------------------
-----------------------
1,609
644
172,320
f0.019
f14,767
OOYNTOYH
30,010
16,672
20,006,667
0.014
299,863
COCONUT GROVE
5,165
2,583
3,099,000
0.017
53,524
LITTLE HAUAHA
2.858
19143
1,3719840
0.019
26,232
FLAGAMI
11260
504
604,800
0.019
11,565
ALLAPATTAH
11425
570
684,000
0.019
139079
VIRGIHIA KEY
0
• 0
0
0.000
0
•- -----
CITYYIDE
-------------- -j- ----
42,327 22,116 26,538,627
-------- ----
$0.018 1409,030
(r)
(s)
(t)
(u)
Ron -Residential
Mon -Residential
l�pact
1989-2005
Hew
Police
Police
Fee
Nuwber of
Mon -Residential
lapact Fee
`'Costs
Areas
Esployees
Sq. Ft.
(per sq. ft.)
(s x t)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EDISOH
4,321
i364,631
DOYHTOYN
53,668
10,493,783
0.283
2,966,562
COCONUT GROVE
61513
1,057,36S
0.223
2999054
LITTLE HAVANA
14,033
3,231,166
0.283
913,440
FLAGAMI
2,417
507,128
0,283
143,361
ALLAPATTAH
12,589
2,480,863
0.283
701,331
VIRGINIA KEY
783
3109000
0.283
87,635
CITYYIDE
94,324
t9,370,644
0.283
s5,476,014
0
4 0
Projected Rev RESidentia) Square Footage:
PLANNING
DISTRICT
1988-90
1190-95
1195-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
.-----------r-----r-------2---r------------r--1r--------------r---------r--r-..----r
ED 1SOH 26, 880 20 t,120
--r-----
226, 080 318, 240 772, 320
OOVNTOVN
3,732,667
4,764,OOD
51533,333
51926,667
_,0,006,60
COCONUT GROVE
151,200
1,132,800
754,200
19060,800
31499,000
LITTLE HAVANA
67,200
503,520
376,800.
4249320
11371,840
FLAGAMI
40,320
201,600
150,720
212,160
604,800
ALLAPATTAH
13,440
201,600
150,720
318,240
684,000
VIRGINIA KEY
0
0
O
0
0
TOTAL
41031,707
7,044,641
71241,853
81260,427
26,538,627
Projected Rev
Hon -Residential Square
Footage:
PLANNING
DISTRICT
1988-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
------ --------•----------------
EDISON
-----------------•---•---•-------------------•---
202,123
427,702
36/,788
295,223
1,289,836
DOWOWN
3,292,531
21766,377
2
- 1104,734
2,330,141
10,413,733
COCONUT GROVE
247,121
267,267
290,305
263,175
1,057,868
LITTLE HAVANA
499,717
1,133,248
910,844
687,357
3,23t,166
FLAGAMI
82,841
171,826
1289782
123,679
507,128
ALLAPATTAH
393,731
849,354
717,552
520,168
2,430,363
VIRGINIA KEY
60,000
250,000
0
0
310,000
TOTAL
4,778,122
51865,774
41507,005�
4,219,743
19,370,644
Projected Rev
Residential Police Costs;
PLANNING
DISTRICT
1980-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-15
TOTAL
---------------------------------•---------------------------------------------------
EDISON
1514
$3,845
14,323
$6,085
---------
114,767
DOWNTOWN
54,080
69,022
309813
85,868
281,863
COCONUT GROVE
21611
19,565
13,026
18,322
53,524
LITTLE HAVANA
11285
9,628
7,205
8,114
26,232
FLAGAMI
771
3,855
2,862
4,057
11,565
ALLAPATTAN
257
30855
2,882
6,065
13,079
VIRGINIA KEY
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
$59,518
$109,770
1111,211
$128,531
1409,030
Projected Nev Non -Residential Police
Costs;
PLAHNINO
DISTRICT
1908-90
1990.95
1995-2000
2004.05
TOTAL
wwwwwwwwwewwwwwwww-:wrww-.-*-w........0,wwww..wewww.ww-ww.ww--_
EDISON $57,139 11209910
............ rwww-w♦w.www.ww.
1103,1k4 183,458 $364,631
0001011"
930,781
WOW W
595,002
650,724
2,966,562
COCONUT GROVE
69,860
751555
79,141
74,398
?99, 054
LITTLE HAVANA
141,260
320,46
2570493
114,313
913,440
FLRGAh1
23,418
48,574
36,406
34,963
143,361
ALLAPATTAN
111,323
240,109
202,@44
147,050
°01,331 .
VIRGINIA KEY
16,961
70,674
0
0
87,635
TOTAL
11,3504758
11,658435
114V6015
11,192,916
0,476,014
4r
s
FIRE/RESCUE - &ESIDEHTIAL
------------------------------------------------------------
1988-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
Additional Residents
56
419
471
663
1,601
Costs: EIergency Medical Rescue Unit
Expansion 1 13001000
$336
129514
12,826
13,978
19,654
per 50,000 persons
Doiiintown
Additional Residents
51599
11146
3,375
3,890
309010
Costs:
Haz. Mat./Fos Apparatus @ 1300,000/145,030 persons
s11,581
$14,781
1179324
i18,389
162,075
Esergency Medical Rescue Unit 1 1203,101/50,001 persons
$22,731
$29,112
$341102
136,193
11219838
Aerial Fire Apparatus a $500,400171,301
persons
M,263
$50,111
$58,729
362,341
1210,444
173,575
$93,904
$110,053
$1169823
1394,357
Coconut Grove
Additional Residents
252
19888
1,257
1,768
5,165
Cosh:_ Esergency Medical Rescue Unit
@ i300,000/50,000
111023
$7,665
$5,103
$7,172
120,969
persons
Little Havana
_
Additional Residents
140
1,049
785
334
21858
Costs: Esergency Medical Rescue Unit
@ i300,000/50,000
1568
$4,253
$3,187
13,589
tt1,602
persons
Total Additional Residents
392
?,937
2,042
2,652
81023
Total Costs
175,502
$108,341
$121,171
1131,568
$436,582
TOTAL FIREIRESCUE RESIDENTIAL COSTS
1988-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
1336
12,514
$2,826
139978
199654
Dovntoon
73,575
93,904
110,055.
116,823
394,357
Coconut Grove
1,023
7,665
5,103
71178
20,969
Little Havana
568
4,258
3,187
31589
11,602
Flagm
0
0
0
0
0
Allapattah
0
0
0
0
0
Virginia Key
0
0
0
0
0
Total
175,502
$118,341
$121,171
1131,568
$436,582,
FIRE/RESCUE - RESIDENTIAL COEFFICIENTS
Edison
0.013
Oomton
0.020
Coconut Grove
0,001
Little Havana
0.018
Fiagae:
0.000
Aliapattah
0.000
Virginia Key
O.Q00
F1RE/RESCUE - 4ON-RESIDENTIAL
1988-90
1190-55
1995-2000
2000-45
TOTAL
Edison---------------------------------------.._..-------------------
_
Additional Employees
746
1,444
1,208
123
41321
Costsi Emergency Medical Rescue Unit Expansion is
$300,000
$4,476
18,664
17,248
15,538
125026
per 50,000 persons
Do�nto�n
Additional Employees.
13,138
16,282
13,852
10,316
53,668
Costs:
Hazy Mat./Foam Apparatus 1 1311,100/145,030 persons
1279176
133,679
128,653
1219504
1111,012
Emergency Medical gnat Unit E 1213,000/50,001 persons
t539340
166,114
156,239
1429217
$217,894
Aerial Fire Apparatus 1 15489101/71,301 persons
--------------------------------------------------------------
192,130
1114,177
$97,137
172,102
1376.346
1172,646
1213,960
$182,029
1136,613
$705,248
Coconut Grove
Additional Employees
19066
20322
1,840
1,285
6,513
Costs: Emergency Medical Rescue Unit 0 1300,000/50,000
.14,327
$9,427
17,470
1;5,217
$26,441
persons
-
Little Havana
Additional Employees
2,258
4,974
3,963
2,838
14,033
Costs:. -Emergency Medical Rescue Unit d 1300,000/50,000
19,167
120,114
116,039
111,522
156,972
persons
Total Additional Employees
17,208
. 5,022
20,863
15,442
79,333
Total Costs
1190,616
$252,245
1212,836
$158,890
1814,587
TOTAL FIRE/RESCUE NON-RESIDENTIAL COSTS
1988-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2010-05
TOTAL
Edison
$4,476
19,664
17,248
15,538
125,926
Dovntom
172,646
213,960
182,029
136,613
715,243
Coconut Grove
4,327
9,427
7,470
5,217
26,441'
Little Havana
91167
20,194
16,089
. 11,522
56,972
Flagami
0
0
0
0
0
Allapattah
0
0
0
0
0
Virginia Key
0
0
0
0
0
Total
$190,616
1252,245
$212,336
$158,390
$814,587
FIRE/RESCUE - NON-RESIDENTIAL COEFFICIENTS
Edison
0.420
Damto�n
0.067
Coconut Grove
0,025
little N4van4
0.018
Flagasi
0.000
Allapattah
01010
Virgini4 Key
0,000
RESIDENTIAL PARK ENHANCEMENT COSTS
1188.10
1190-15
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison-----------------------------
__...�....----_-..------.
r._---
Mini Park (@ 0.1 acre/1000 residents, 114.00/sf)
$975
17,300
$8,206
1111552
528,033
Heighborhooa Park (@ �.5 4crt/1000 residents, @ 12.00/sf)
2,439
18,251
20,516
28,880
70,086
Cossunity Park (1 1.0 acre/1000 residents, 1 11.00/50
2,439
18,251
20,516
281880
70,086
District Total
15,853
143,802
149,238
169,312
1168,205
Oovntovn
Mini Park (1 0.1 acre/1001 residents, 1 14.10/sf)
Neighborhood Park (@ 0.5 acre/1010 residents, @ 12.00/sf)
Coasunity Park (1 1.0 acre/1000 residents, 1 11.00/sf)
District Total
Coconut Grave -
Mini Park (@ 0.1 acre/1000 residents, 1 14.10/sf)
Neighborhood Park (@ 0.5 acre/1000 residents, @ 12.00/sf)
Coasunity Park (1 1.0 acre/1000 residents, 1 11.00/sf)
District Total
Little Havana
Mini Park (@ 0.1 acre/1000 residents, 1 14.00/sf)
Heighbo"ood Park (@ 0.5 acre/1000 residents, @ 12.00/sf)
Colmunity Park (1 1.0 acre/1010 residents, 1 11.00/sf)
District Total
Flagami
Mini Park (@ 0.1 acre/1000 residents, @ 14.00/sf)
Neighborhood Park (@ 0.5 acre/1000 residents, @ 12.00/sf)
Comnity Park (1 1.6 acre/1000 residents, I 11.00/sf)
- District Total
Allapattah
Mini Park (1 0.1 acre/1000 residents, 1 14.00/sf)
Neighborhood Park (0 04 eve/1010 residents, @ i2,00/0)
Cossunity Park (1 1.0 acre/1001 residents, 1 $1.00/sf)
District Total
Vir9ini4 Keyx
Mini Park U 0,1 xre/1000 residents, 1 14.10/sf)
Neignbprnoo4 Park (@ Q,5 4cre/1000 residents, 0 t2,00/sf)
Corsuna!ty Park t1 1.4 acrW001 residents, 1 11.004f)
District Total
Total Residential Park Costs
r No relident ai deytiopetat is anticiplttO in Virginia Key,
$17,556 1124,511 $145,926 1154,899 15229892
243,892 311,279 364,815 387,248 11307,234
243,892 311,280 364,815 3871248 1,307,235
--------------------------------------------------------------
$585,340 1747,069 $875,556 1929,395 $3,137,361
14,390 $329896 1219901 1301805 $89,992
10,977 82,241 54,754 77,014 224,936
10,977 82,241 54,754 77,014 224,986
--------------------------------------------------------------
126,344 1197,378 1131,409 1184,833 $539,964
12,439 118,277 $13,677 $15,402 $49,715
6,098 459694 34,194 39,507 124,493
6,098 45,694 34,194 38,507 124,493
114,635 $109,665 162,065 1929416 1298,781
11,463 17,318 $5,471 $7,701 $21,953
3,659 18,295 13,677 19,253 549884
39659 18,295 13,677 19,253 54,884 .
-----------------------------------------------------------
$8,781 143,908 132,825 146,207 1131,721'
$487 $7,318 $5,471 111,552 $24,828
11219 19,295 , 13,677 29,880 62,071
11219 18,295 13,677 20,880 620071
............ ...w...................w.......w-.w-w..,......... .ww..
129925 143,908 132,825 169,312 $148, 971
1q sq s0 f0 f0
0 Q Q u o
0 0 0 0 0
•wwwewwweswwwwwwwwwww+wwwawwwwww+ewewwwwwwwwwwwwwww.wwwwwwwwww
10 f0 f0 1q f0
;643,978 11,135,°30 fi,203,91� $1,391,475 $4,425,001
17 126
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL PARK COSTS
k
}j
Edison
Downtovn
i Coconut.Grove
Little Havana
Ftaga��
Allapattah
Virginia Key
is
( Total
F
i
}
PARKS - RESIDENTIAL IMPACT FEE COEFFICIENTS
Edison
nerntern
1988-90
1990-45
1995-2000
2010-05
TOTAL
---------------------
----r---r--------
15,353
t43,802
$49,238
1699312
1163.z05
5859340
7471069
$75,556
929,395
39IV, 360
26,344
197,378
1310409
184,833
539,164
14,635
l09,665
82,065
129416
298,781
8,781
43,909
32,825
46,207
131,721
21925
43,908
321825
699312
148,970
0
0
0
0
0
1643,878 51,1859730 119203,918 111391,475 14,4259001
' 0.218
O.157
[E
CALCULATION OF PARKS IMPACT FEE COEFFICIENTS
PARKS - 001147011H URBAN PARK DEVELOPMENT NON-RESIDENTIAL COSTS
Percent
Method
Total
Hon -Res.
Hon-P.es,
of Cost
Isprovesent
Use and/or
Development
Project Hake
Estimate
---
Cost
-------------- -----------_»--___._-»�
Benefit
Share
----------- -----------------
849front Park
---------------------- -----------------------------
Unfunded south portion
s7,411,010
25x
s1,850,000
llaterfront Park
55 acres 1 III per square foot
23,958,801
25%
599891501
Brickell Park
4.7 acres @ $10 per square Foot
2,047,000
75%
19545,250
Brickell Promenade
Consultant estimate based on design
31000,000
75%
2,2500000
Pace Park
1700 1.F. of bayraik @ $4 per I.F.
na,iia
ax
1i5,000
Southsi`de Park
Capital Ikprovekent Program cost estimate
700,000
25%
175,000
LukkusPark -
Planning Dept. estimate based on design
190009000
25%
250,000
Biscayne Blvd.
180,000 s.f. 1 110 plus 6 blks 1 $1.5 million
61000,000
25Z
1,500,000
Flagler Street
Consultant estimate: 5 blks to tL 5 million
7,5000000
25x
11875,000
Rivervanks
504 l.f. 1 S 4 per I.f.
200,000
25%
$0,000
SE 12th Street Park
12,500 S.F. @ i10 per S.F.
125,040
75%
931750
Brickell Avenue
41400 1.F. x 35 Ft. vidth 1 $6.67 per s.f.
11000,000
. 75%
750,000
I+E 4th Street
550 I.F. x 50 ft. vidth @ 110 per S.F.
275,000
25%
6817,00
HE 14th Street
1300 l.f. x 70`ft. vidth 1 110 per S.F.
910,000
75%
682,500
Riverbanks Park
48,000 S.F. @ $10 per S.F. _
480,000
75%
360,000
$55,295,040
s17,604,750
EXIS71HG NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
33,101,407
HEY NOR -RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT
10,4939783
HEY NOR -RESIDENTIAL
SHARE OF TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL
24.1%
HEY HON-RESIDENTIAL
SHARE OF PARK COST
f4,237,7�0
COST PER SOUARE FOOT
$0.404
(Source: Planning Department, City of Miami, 1188)
PARKS - NON-RESIDENTIAL IMPACT FEE COEFFICIENTS
Edison •
s0,000
Dovntogn
0,414
Coconut Grove
0.000
Little Havana
01000
Flagami
O,OQO
Al lapamb
0,000
Virginia Key
s0,000
10426 mo
CALCULATION OF STREETS/SEVERS IMPACT FEE
COEFFICIENTS.
STREMSTORM SEVERS -PORTION
OF CONSTRUCTION
COSTS 10 BE FUNDED BY IMPACT
FEESM:
(PERCENTAGE OF NEW DEVELOPMENT TO TOTAL DEVELOPMENT)
TOTAL
TOTAL HEY
OEVELOPMENt
DEVELOPMENT
IN 2045
SHARE
Edison
2,062,156
46,278,304
4.0446
Downtown
30,500,450
96,906,590
0.3147
Coconut Grove
41156,868
30,487,350
0.1363
Little Havana
41603,006
65,481,579
0.0703
Flagaai
1,111,928
25,1619025
0.0442
Allapatt4h
31164,863
41,029,223
0.0771
..Virginia Key
310,000
0
0.0000
Total
45,909,271
i059352,076
PROJECTED INCREASE IN
TOTAL
TOTAL HEY
SQUARE FOOTAGE
1988-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-05
DEUELOPMENT
Edison
----------------------------------------------------------------
229,003
628,822
590,863
613,463
2,062,156
Dovntovn
7,025,198
7,530,377
7,688,067
8,256,808
30,500,450
Coconut Grove
398,321
114009067
1,034,505 __1,323,175
41156,868
Little ,Havana
566,117
1,636,768
1,287,644
1,111,677
416039006
Flagasi
123,161
373,426
2799512
335,839
1,111,928
Allapattah
407,229
1,050,954
868,272
838,408
3,1649863
Uirginia Key
60,000
250,000
0
0
3109000
Total
99809,829
12,870,414
11,748,858
12,480,170
45,109,271
3TREET/SEVER COSTS -
TOTAL COSTS
1960-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2500-05
TOTAL
Edison
1101,381
1270,383
$261,581
1271,584
$912,930
Downtown
21970,494
311840101
3,2500773
3,491,261
12,8961637
Coconut Grove
267,674
941,854
695,194
889,720
2,793,444
Little Havana
177,153
512,045
412,825
347,776
1,440,001
Flagams
1001285
304,067
227,508
273,461
905,402
Allapatt4h
203,347
524,787
433,566
418,654
11580135
Virginia KeyMM
0
0
0
0
0
Total
13,820,534
$5,744,237
15,271,532
0,692,456
120,528,7,0
t Costs for street/stors steer devsiopeenti 17/60 ytars x 110 silts x 5.280 ft./silt x
150 f/lintir ft. x 0.03 portion of Costs which are now noA•tSsessiDl+s x shire of new
4tvtlopsen4 in t,isn district. Costs ptr linear foot in tstisited it $300 in the
Oorr►tQ�n pisttict�
$$No street/store steer construction is pro4l6 to for Virginia Kty,
1
STREETS - COSTS
(2/3 X total SEreet/Store Sewer
Costs)
1988�40
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-05
'OTAL
Edison
167,587
S1851.588
----------------------
1174, 387
1101, 055
f608, 617
Downtown
1,986,329
2,122,733
2,167,185
2,3270507
3,597,754
Coconut Grove
178,449
627,235
4639462
593,146
1,862,292
Little Havana
118,235
3419363
268,549
231,850
9$99997
Flagili
66,856
202,711
151,725
182,307
613,599
Allapittah
1359564
349,857
289,043
279,102
1,053,566
Virginia Key
0
0
0
0
0
Total
12,547,020
$3,329,487
$3,514,351
t3,194,967
$13,685,325
STREETS - RESIDENTIAL COSTS
1988-90
1990-95
1195-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
---------------------------------------------------------------
$7,933
159,357
166,724
193,924
$227,938
Downtown
1,052,199
1,342,920
1,573,882
11670,664
5,639,665
coconut Grove
67,733
507,418
337,S84
475,242
1,3881362
little Havana
14,015
105,013
78,584
98,495
286,107
Flagm
21,887
109,436
81,316
1159161
328,308
Allapattah
4,474
67,111
50,173
105,940
227,698
Virginia Key
0
0
0-
0
0
Total
STREETS - HOH-RESIDENTIAL COSTS
1191689246 12,191,335 129189,063 12,549,434 18,098,078
1989-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
$59,653
$126,230
$107,662
$87,130
$380,675
Downtown
928,129
779,812
593,302
656,842
2,958,085
Coconut Grove
110,710
119,736
125,577
117-1903
4739926
Little Havana
1049219
236,344
189,964
141,354
673,836
Flagasi
44,968
93,274
69,908
67,137
275,287
AIIapattah
131,089
282,745
233,869
173,161
825,864
Virginia Key
0
0
0
0
0
Total
11,378,768
$19638,146
$1,325,282
$1,245,327
15,587,723
STREETS • IMPACT
FEE COEFFICIENTS
Edison
11.295
lowntown
0.282
Coconut Grove
0,448
little H#wns
01209
F149jo l
0,543
1l lapotih
01333
Virginia Key
t0,000
Z1 1426 ' .
i
0
STORM SEVERS - COSTS
(1/3 x total Street/Stort Sever
Costs)
1198-90
1990-95
1195-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
----------------------------------------------------------------
$33,793
192,194
197,113
190,527
1304,307
Doontown
190,164
11061,366
1,083,592
11163,153
14,218,815
Coconut Grove
89,224
3139617
231,731
296,573
11319145
Little Havana
59,117
1709681
1349274
115,925
1479,997
Flagam
33,429
101,355
75,862
11,153
$311,798
AlIapattah
67,782
174,929
144,521
1391551
1526,782
Virginia Key
0
1
0
0
10
Total
i1,213,508
$1,914,741
11,757,173
S1,831,482
16,842,104
STORM SEVERS - RESIDENTIAL COSTS
1988-90
1990-95
1995-2600
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
$3,966
f29,678
$33,362
146,161
1113,967
Dovntovn
526,099
671,460
7869940
$35,332
2,819,831
Coconut Grove
33,868
253,748
168,942
237,621
694,179
Little Havana
7,007
52,506
39,292
44,247
1439052
Flagau
10,943
54,718
40,908
57,584
164,153
Allapattah
2,237
33,555
25,086
521970
1139848
Virginia Key
0
0
0
0
0
total
$584,120
119095,665
$1,094,530
$1,274,715
14,049,030
STORM SEVERS - HOH-RESIDENTIAL
COSTS
1988-90
1998-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
129,826
1639115
153,830
143,565
1190,336
Doentoen
464,064
399,905
296,651
328,420
1,419,040
Coconut Grove
55,355
59,868
62,788
581,951
236,962
Little Havana
52,109
118,174
94,991
71,677
336,941
Flagam
22,484
46,636
34,953
33,568
137,641
Allapattah
650544
141,372
119,434
86,580
412,930
Virginia Key
0
1
0
0
0
Total
$609,382
$819,070
1662,637
1622,761
12,7931851
STORM SEVERS - IMPACT FEE COEFFICIENTS
Edison
0,149
Oovntovn
0,141
Coconut Grove
O.ZZ4
Little Havana
0.104
Flagari
01VI
Al lapatt4h
01166
Virginia Key
0.000
0
�ESIDEHTIAL SOLID YAM COSTS
PROJECTED TOTAL NEV UNITS
1988-90
1990-95
1915-2000
2000-95
TOTAL
Edison
---------------------------------------------------------------
22
168
188
265
644
Downtown
39111
3,970
41653
41139
16,672
Coconut Grove
126
944
629
884
24583
Little Havana
56
420
314
354
11143
flagari
34
168
126
177
504
A11apatt4h
11
168
126
265
570
Virginia Key
1
-
1
1
0
0
Total
31364
5,837
6,035
6,88 4
22,116
PROJECTED TOTAL HEY RESIDENTIAL SOLID PASTE
TONNAGE (TONS PER
YEAR)
^ �� ` -- " "
Q c..0 ovuayti uvvasuN,Y rut' W�fl(.Onl,
2. 40 tuns per household for Coconut Grove and
3 tons
per household for rest of City
1988-90
1990-95
1915-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
67.200
_502.800
565.200
795.600
1,930.200
Oowntovn
6,718.800
8,575.210
10,050.000 •10,668.000
36,012.000
Coconut Grove
302.400
2,265.600
1,508.400
2,121.600
6,112-000
Little Havana
168.000
1,258.800
942.000
1,060.800
3,429.600
Flagasl
100.800
504.000
376.800
530.400
1,512.000
Allapattah
33.600
504.000
376.800
795.600
1,710.000
Virginia Key
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Total
7,390.801
139610.410
13,819.200
15,972.000
50,792.400 -
PROJECTED TOTAL HEY RESIDENTIAL GARBAGE (TONS PER YEAR)
1 50% of residential solid 'waste
1988-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
-------------------------------------------------------------
33.600
251.400
282.600
397,300
•f65.400
Downtown
3,359.400
41287.600
5,025.000
5,334.000
18,006.000
Coconut Grove
151.200
11132.800
754.200
11060,800
3,019.000
Little Havana
84.000
629.400
471.000
530.400
1,714.800
Flagam
50.400
252.000
188.400
265.200
756.000
Allapattah
16.800
252.000
188.400
397.800
355.000
Virginia Key
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Total
3,695.400
61805.200
6,909.600
7,986.000
25,396.200
PROJECTED TOTAL NEW RESIDENTIAL TRASH
(TONS PER YEAR)
1 50% of residential Solid waste
1988.90
1990-95
1995.2000
2000-45
TOTAL
.r.w.r........rw....w.wwwrwrwwrr....r
..........................
-
Edison
33.600
251.400
282,600
397.800
965.400
Downtown
3, 59,409
4,287,600
51025,000
5,334,000
10,006.000
Coconut Grove
151.200
1,132,800
754.200
1,060,800
31119,000
Little Havana
84,001
629,400
471,001
530.400
1,714,800
F149111
50,400
252.000
188,400
265,200
116,000
Allapatt4h
16.800
252,000
108,400
397,800
855,100
Virginia Key
Q,1Q0
01000
0.000
0.000
01140
t
{
e
Q
k:
ti
t
PROJECTED TOTAL
HEY RESIDENTIAL GARBAGE (TONS
PER PICKUP DAY)
truck pick-ubs
asiured a 208 tires per year
3
-----------------------------------------------------------------
1988-90
1990-45
1995-2000
2000-95
TOTAL
Edison
0.162
1.209
1.359
1.913
4.641
Downtovn
16.151
20.613
24.159
25.644
36.567
Coconut Grove
0.727
5.446
3.626
5.1a0
14.899
Little Havana
0,404
3.026
2.264
2.550
8.244
'
Flagaii
0,242
1.212
0.906
1.275
3.635
Allapattah
0.481
1.212
0.906
1.913
4.111
Virginia Key
0.010
0.110
0.000
0.104
0.001
i
Total
17.766
32.717
33.219
38.394
122.017
i
PROJECTED TOTAL
HEY RESIDENTIAL TRASH (TONS PER PICKUP DAY)
truc-k pick-ups
assumed @ 208 times per year
1188-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
-----------------
-----------------------------------------------
-
Edison
0.162
1.209
1.359
1.913
4.641
Dovntovn
16.151
20.613
24.159
25.644
36.567
Coconut Grove
0.727
5.446
3.626
5.100
14.999
Little Havana
0.404
3.126
2.264
2.550
3.214
1
Fiagami
0.242
1.212
0.906
1.275
3.635
Allapattah
0.081
1.212
_._ 0.906
1.913
4.111
Virginia Key
0.000
0.001
0.000
C.000
0.000
j
i
Total
17.766
32.717
33.219
38.394
122.097
2+t'�';,
x
PROJECTED ADDITIONAL SOLID'YAStE EQUIPMENT REQUIRED iESIDENUAL
Residential Paste Generation:
a load is assuied to consist of 50% garbage and 50% trash
residential pick-up days assured at 208
(Source: Miari Deoartkent of Solid Paste)
Edison:
1988-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Garbagetrucks: -----------------------------------------------------------
Rer Residential Oarbage (Tons Per Pickup Day)
0.162
1.209
1.359
1.913
4.641
Nuiber of Trucks Req'd @ 12 Tons Per Load and 2 Loads Per Day
0.007
0.050
0.057
0.080
0.193
Cost! 1100,000 Per Garbage Truck
$673
15,036
$5,661
17,969
$199339
Trash Trucks:
Rev Residential Trash (Tons Per Pickup Day)
0.162
1.209
1.359
1.913
4.641
Nuiber of Trucks Req'd @ 7 Tons Per Load and 3 Loads Per Day
0.008
0.058
0.065
0.091
0.221
VV-V• •VV,YVV Nr Trasl•, Truck
1462
13,453
13,882
159464
113,261
-
Cranes:-
Naber of Cranes Reo'd ! 1 Crane per 2 Trash Trucks
0.404
0.029
0.032
0.046
0.111
Cost: U 30,000 Per Crane
1500
13,741
14,205
$5,920
114,366
TOTAL
11,635
112,230
113,748
119,353
146,166
Domtovn:
1988-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Garbage Trucks: ----------------------------------------------------------
Rer Residential Garbage (Tons Per Pickup Day)
16.151
20.613
24.159
25.64.4
86.567
Nusber,of Trucks Req'd 8 12 Tons Per Load and 2 Loads Per Day
0.673
0.859
.1.007
1.069
3.607
Cost: 1100,000 Per Garbage Truck .
167,296
185,889
$100,661
$106,851
$360,697
Trash Trucks:
Aar Residential Trash (Tons Per Pickup Day)
16.151
20.613
24.159
25.644
86.567
Nuiber of Trucks Req'd @ 7 Tons Per Load and 3 Loads Per Day
0.761
0.982
1.150
1.221
4.122
Cost: 160,000 Per Trash Truck
1469146
$58,896
169,025
$73,269
$247,335
Cranes:
Nuiber of Cranes Req'd ! 1 Crane per 2 Trash Trucks
0.385
0.491
0.575
00611
2.061
Cost: $130,000 Per Crane
149,991
163,804
$74,777
179,375
.$267,946
TOTAL
$163,432
1208,539
$244,463
$259,495
$075,979
Coconut Grove:
_
1988-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-95
TOTAL
Garbage husks;,_........--........................................... ...-
Nee Residential Garbage (Tons Per Pickup Day)
0,727
5,446
31626
51100
14,899
Hysber of TrucKs Req'd 8 12 Tons Per load and 2 toads Per Day
0.030
0,227
01151
0.213
0,621
Cost; $100,000 Per Garbage Truck
13,029
122,692
115,106
s211250
162,079
Trash Trucks;
Nty REs.idensial.Trish (Tons Per Pickup Day)
0.727
5.446
3,626
5.100
14#019
Huebsr of Trucks Req'd t3 7 Tons Per Load ano 3 Loads Per Day
)1035
0.2a9
0.173
0.243
0.709
Cost; 16Q,0QQ Per Trish Truck
121077
$15,560
i10,360
114,571,
$42,569
Cranes;
Nuitber of Cranes 1ea14 11 Crane Per 2 Trisn Trucks
0.011
01130,
01086
0,131
01356
�,osts 1190,Q00 Per Crine
120250
$16,657
1111M
$15,766 °
116,116
TOTAL �.-
1713w6
$554110
1364611
151,607,
11514164
.t
1
Little Havana:
3arbace iracxs;
Hew Residential Garbage (Tons Per Pickup Day)
Nuaber of Trucks Req'd @ 12 Tons Per Load and 2 Loads Per Day
Cost: $140,000 Per Garbage Truck
Trash Trucks:
New Residential Trash (Tons Per Pickup Day)
Number of Trucks Req'd @ 7 Tons Per Load and 3 Loads Per Day
Cost: 160,000 Per Trash Truck
Cranes:
Nuaber of Cranes Req;'d ° 1 Crane Nt+` 2 Trash irucks
Cost: 1130,000 Per Crane
TOTAL
- =lagaal:
5arbaoe (rucks:
ize Residential Garbage (Tons Per Pickup Day)
4usber of Trucks Req'd @ 12 Tons Per Load and
2 Loads Per Day
Cost: 1100,000 Per Garbage Truck
Trash Trucks:
New Residential Trash (Tons Per Pickup Day)
Mustier of Trucks Req'd @ 7 Tons Per Load and
3 Loads Per Day
Cost: 1609000 Per Trash Truck
Cranes:
dumber of Cranes Req'd t 1 Crane per 2 Trash
Trucks,
Cost: $130,000 Per Crane
TOTAL
Allapattah:
Garbage lacks:
New Residential Garbage (Tons Per Pickup Day)
Nuaber of Trucks Req'd 0 18 Tons Per load and
2 Loads Per Day
Cost; 1100,000 Per Garbage Truck
Irish Try4ks;
Hew Residential Trash (Tons Per Pickup Day)
Nusbsr of Trycxs Req'd 0 7 Tons Per Load and
3 Loads Per Day
Costs 160,000 Per Trash Truck
cranes;
4vsber of Cranes Re0'0 ! I Cren4 per s Trasn
Trucks
Cost; s1301000 Per 4rane
TOTAL
1988-90
1110.95
1195-2000
2000-85
TOTAL
0, 404
3.026
2,264
2.550
8.244
0.017
0.126
0.094
0.106
0.344
$1,683
112,608
11,435
1101625
134,351
0.404
3.026
2.264
2.550
8.244
0.019
0.144
0.108
0.121
0.393
$1,154
18,646
16,470
17,286
123,555
0.010
0.072
0.054
0.061
0.196
i1,250
191366
17,009
$7,893
s25,�18
$4,087
$30,620
122,914
125,804
$83,424
1988-90
----------------------------------------------------------
1190-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
0.242
1.212
0.906
1.275
3.635
0.010
0.050 ..
0.038
0.053
9.151
$1,010
15,048
13,774
$5,313
115,144
0.242
1.212
0.906
1.275
3.635
0.012
0.058
0.043
0.061
0.173
1692
13,462
12,588
13,643
110,385
0.006
0.029
0.022
0.030
0.087
1750
13,750
$2,804
13,946
111,250
12,452
$12,260
19,166
1121902
$36,779
1988-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
0481
1.212
0.906
11913,
4.111
0.003
0.050
0.038
0.080
0,111
1337
15,048
13,774
$7,969
i171127
26
01081
1.212
0,906
1.913
41111
0,004
0.058
0.043
0.091
01196
f131
13,462
1Z,568
15,16�
i11,7IS
0.002
1250
0.029
SO
1817 11Y,2b0
13, I
0.07Z
O,OM16
01090
'1irC�nia Ke4:
GArbaae trucks:
44v kw oent:al 6arbaoe (ions Per Pitkub Dav)
4ueb►r *t trucks Re,T"d O 12 ions Per Load and 2 Loads Per Ow
Cost: $100,000 Per Garbage truck
1998-90
1190-15
ills-2000
ZOOMS TOTAL
-----......................._..____-----_-....._...._.__-
0.000
1.000
0.000
0.000 1.000
3.000
0.000
1.000
0.000 11000
SO
t0
t0
t0 $0
trash Trucks!
►
4?v Residential Trash (Tons Per Pickup Day)
0.000
0.008
0.000
0.000
4.001
Hurber of Trucks Req'd 8 7 tons Per Load and
3 Loads
Per Day
0.000
0.000
0,000
0.000
0.010
Cost: $68,000 Per Trash Truck
t1
t0
t0
s0
to
Cranes:
Wjsber.of Cranes Req'd 8 1 Crane per 2 Trash
Trucks
0.060
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1;ost: $130,000 Per Crane
t0
t0
t0
30
?Q
TOTAL
s0
s0
t0
SO
s0
TOTAL SOLID VASTE RESIDEHTIAL COSTS
1988-90
1190-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
"`
-------
Edison
---------------------------------------------------
11,634
112,230
$13,748
$19,352
146,164
Dovntovn
163,432
208,588
244,462
259,495-
875,977
Coconut Grove
7,355
55,109
36,691
51,601
150,762
Little Havana
4,086
30,619
22,913
25,803
339421
''
Flanui
2,451
12,259
9,165
12,901
36,776
Allapattah
817
12,259
% 165
19,352
41,593
Virginia Key 0 0 0 0 0
Total 1179,,75 1331,064 1336,144 $333,510 $1,235,413
Y •
} SOLID PASTE - RESIDENTIAL COEFFICIENTS
Edison $0.061
Dovntovn 0.044
1' Coconut Grove 0.049
O ttit Havana 0.061
Flagm 0.061
Allapatth 0.061
10.000
Virginia Key 1042
x
I
11
r]
SOLID PASTE - 4ON-RESIDEHTIAL COSTS
PROJECTED TOTAL HEY HOH-RESIDENTIAL SOLID
PASTE (POUNDS PER
DAY)
a citywide average of 3 ID. per 100 sq.
Ft. per day
1188.90
1990.95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
6,663.7
12,831.1
10,943.6
8,856.7
38,695.1
00Vntown
90,775.9
82,991.3
63,142.0
69,904.2
314,813.5
Coconut Grove
7,413.6
80018.0
8,449.2
7,895.3
31,736.0
Little Havana
14,991.5
33,997.4
27,325.3
20,620.7
16,935.0
Flags
2,485.2
5,154.8
3,863.5
3,710.4
15,213.3
�;;;�.;�,;,
11,813.7
25,480.E
21,526.6
15,605.0
74,425.9
Virginia Key
19800.0
7150060
0.0
0.0
1,310.0
Total
143,343.7
175,973.2
135,210.2
126,592.3
`31,119.3
PROJECTED HEY NON-RESIDEHTIAL GARBAGE (POUNDS PER DAY)
1 SOy of total Solid Paste
1188-90 1190-95 1195-2000 2000-05 TOTAL
Edison
3,031.3
69415.5
5,471.3
4,428.3
19,347.3
Dovntovn
49,388.0
41,495.7
31,571.0
34,952.1
157,406.7
Coconut Grove
3,706.3
4:001.0
4,204.6
3,947.6
15,368.0
Little Havana
7,495.8
169998.7
13,662.7
10,310.4
48,467.5
Flagam
1,242.6
2,577.4
19931.7
19855.2
7,616.9
Allapattah
5,906.8
12,740.3
10,763.3
7,802.5
37,212.9
Virginia Key
100.0
3,750.0
0.0
0.0
4,650.0
Total
71,671.8
$7,986.6
67,605.1
63,296.1
290,559.7
PROJECTED HEY NON-RESIDENTIAL TRASH (POUNDS PER DAY)
1 50'% of Total Solid Paste
t988-90
1990-a5
1195-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
t;. Edison
_....-...........
3103113
---------- ----------------------------
6,415.5
5,471.3
-............
4,428.3
19,347.E
Doentoan
40.
41,495.7
::,573.0
34,952.1
157,406,1
Coconut Grove
3,706.3
4,009.0
4,244.6
3,947.6
15,368.0
Little Havens
7,495,8
16,998,7
13,66217
10,310.4
48,467.5
Ftagaal
1,242,E
2,577.4
1,931.7
1135513
7,616.1
allapatt:h
5,906,$
32,740,3
10,763.3
1402.5
37,212.9
Virginia Key
900.0
30750.0
0.0
010
4,650.0
Total
71, 671, 3
97,986.6
67, 605,1
63, 296.1
290, 559, 7
jo 42
7
PROJECTED NEW NON-RESIDENTIAL
GARBAGE (IONS PER PICKUP DAY)
ittuck.olckuDs assured at 260
tires Der year)
1188.90
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
1.5
3.2
2.7
2.2
3.7
Ooontovn
24.7
20.7
15.3
17.5
73.7
Coconut Orove
1.9
2.0
2.1
2.0
7.9
Little Havana
3.7
8.5
6.8
14.2
24.2
F14gali
0.6
1.3
1.0
0.9
3.8
Allapattah
3.0
6.4
5.4
3.1
18.6
Virginia Key
0.5
1.1
1.0
1.0
2.3
Total
35.3
44.0
33.3
31.6
145.3
PROJECTED HEY NON-RESIDENTIAL
TRASH (DONS PER PICKUP DAY)
(truck pickups assumed at 260
times per yeir)
1188-90
-------------------------------------------------------------------
1910-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
1.5
3.2
2.7
2.2
9.7
Downtown
24.7
20.7
15.3
17.5
73.7
Coconut Grove
1.9
2.0
2.1
2.0
7.9
Little Havana
3.7
3.5
6.8
5.2
24.2
Flagasi
0.6
1.3
1.0
0..9
3.8
Allapattah
3.0
6.4
5.4
3.9
18.6
Virginia Key
0 5
1 9
0 0
0 0
2 3
4 .
Total 35.3 44.0 33.3 31.6 143.3
a
PUACTED ADDITIONAL SOLID PASTE EAUIPBEHT REQUIRED = y0N-RESIDENTIAL
!ion -Residential haste Oenerat►on:
a load is assumed to Consist of 50% garbage and 9% trash
non-residential pick-+:p days assumed it 260
(Source: Mu i Department of Solid Yaste)
Edison:
Garbage Trucks:
New Non -Residential Garbage (Tons Per Pickup Div)
Number of Trucks Req'd 1 12 Tons Per Load and 2 Loads Per Day
Cost: 1100,000 Per Garbage Truck
Trash Trucks:
New Non -Residential Trash (Tons Per Pickup Day)
Humber of Trucks Req'd g 7 Tons Per Load and 3 Loads Per Day
Cost: 160,000 Per Trash Truck
Roll WWI Offs:
New Non -Residential Garbage and Trash (Tons Per Pickup Day)
Humber of RO/ROs Req'd 8 1 RO/RO Per 2 Trash or Garbage Trucks
Cost: 110,000 Per Roll WWI Off
1989-90
1990-95
1915-2000
2000.05
TOTAL
--------------------------------------------------------
1.516
3.208
2,736
2.214
9.674
0.063
0.134
0.114
0.092
0.403
16,316
1139366
$11,400
19,226
1469307
1.516
3.209
2.736
2.214
9.674
0.072
0.153
0.130
0.105
0.461 .
14,331
19,165
$7,817
16,326
127,639
3.032
6.416
5.472
4.428
19.348
0.068
0.143
0.122
0.099
0.432
- S677
$1,432
11,221
1988
14,319
Tractors with Hoists:
Hew Non -Residential Garbage and Trash (Tons Per Pickup Day) 3.032 6.416 5.472 4.428 19.346
Number of Tractors Req'd 9 1 Tractor Per 2 Trash or Garbage Trucks 0.063 0.143 0.122 0.099 0.4:32
Cost:, $120,000 Per Tractor $89121 117,184 114,657 $11,862 151,824
Cranes:
Humber of Cranes Req'd ! 1 Crane per 2 Trash Trucks
Cost: $130,000 Per Crane
TOTAL
Downtown:
Garbage Trucks:
New Non -Residential Garbage (Tons Per Pickup Day)
Humber of Trucks Req'd 8 12 Tons Per Load and 2 Loads Per Day,
Cost: 1100,001 Per Garbage Truck
Trash Trucks
New Non -Residential Trash (Tons Per Pickup Day)
Humber of Trucks Req'd @ 7 Tons Per Goad and 3 Loads Per Day
Cost: $60,000 Per Trash Truck
Roll On/Roll Offs:
Nei Non -Residential Garbage and Trish (Tons Per Pickup Day)
Hwber of RO/ROs Reo'd a 1 ROM Per 2 No or Garbage (rucks
Cost: 110,000 Per Roll On/Roll Off
0.036 1.076 0.065 0.053 1.231
$4,692 19,929 S8,468 $6,853 129,943
124,137 $51,076 143,563 135,255 $154,032
1988-90
1990-95
•1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
24,694
20.748
15.786
17.476
78.703
1.029
.0.864
0.658
0.728
3.279
11029892
186,449
165,773
$72,817
$327,931
24.694
20,748
15.786
17.476
78.703
1.176
0.988
0.752
0.832
3.740
170,554
159,281
145,101
149,932
f224i867
49,388
41.496
31.571
$4.152
157.407
1.102
0,926
0.705
0.780
3,514
111,024
19 262
17,047
17,802
135,135
Tractors with Hoists:
Nei Non -Residential Garbage and Trash (Tons Per Pickup Day) 49,389 41,496 31.571 34.952 157,407
yu/bar of Tractors Raga @ 1 Tractor Per 2 Trash or Garbage Trucks 1.102 9.336 1.705 0.730 3,514
Colt;- 11.20,000 Per Tractor 1132,289 1111,149 114,565 193,622 1421,625
Cranes:
Humber of Cranes Re1'd ! 1 'Crime pee' 2 Trash Trucks 0.588 0,494 1.376 1,416 I'M
Cost; 1130,014 Per Tirane f76,434 1644219 148086Q 04,093 1243,606
TOTAL 3� $393,193 1330,960 $41,347 4278465 $1,43.161
11
11
Coconut Grove:
Garbaoe Trucks: ,
low Non -Residential Garbage (Tons Per Pickuo DAY)
4ugber of Trucks Req'd @ 12 Tons Per load and 2 loads Pet DAY
Cost: s100,000 Per Garbage Truck
Irish TtUCXS:
New Non -Residential Trash (Tons Per Pickup Day)
Husber of Trucks Req'd @ 7 Tons Per load and 3 loads Per Day
Cost: 160,000 Per Trash Truck
Roll On/Roll Offs:
New Non -Residential Garbage and Trash (Tons Per Pickup Day)
4ueber of RO/ROs Req'd @ 1 ROM Per 2 Trash or Garb Y;p trnrkc
Cost: S109000 Per Roll On/Roll Off
1988-90
1990-15
11995-2000
2000-05
------------
TOTAL
____
♦-----------------------------------------
1.353
2.005
2.102
1.974
7.934
0.077
0.084
0.488
0.082
0.331
17,723
s81352
18,760
18,224
$33,050
1.853
2.005
2.102
1.174
7.934
0.098
0.095
0.100
0.014
0.378
15,295
15,727
16,017
159639
122,669
3.707
4.009
4.205
3.948
15.868
4,09g
:,CE9
C.094
0.088
0.354
1827
$895
1139
1881
13,542
Tractors with Hoists:
New Won -Residential Garbage and Trash (Tons Per Pickup Day) 3.707 4.009 4.205 3.948 15.868
r. ftsber of Tractors Req'd @ 1 Tractor Per a Trash or Garbage Trucks 0.083 0.089 0.094 0.088 0.354 .
Cost: 1120,000 Per Tractor 11,921 $10,738 $11,262 110,574 $429504
t;ranes:
4aaber of (ranes Req'd E I Crane per 2 Trash Trucks
0.044
0.048
0.050
0.047
0.189
Cost: 1130,000 Per Crane
$5,737
16,204
16,507
16,109
121,558
TOTAL
529,511
$31,917
133,474
131,428
$126,330
Tittle Havana:
1988-90
1190-95
1195-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Garbage Trucks: -----------------------------------------------------------
Hew Mon -Residential Garbage (Tons Per Pickup Day)
3.748
9.499
6.831
5.155
24.234
#"
Number of Trucks Req'd @ 12 Tons Per load and 2 loads Per Day
0.156
0.354
0.285
0.215
1.070'
Cost: f100,006 Per Garbage Truck
$15,616
1359414
120,464
$21,480
5100,974
Trish Trucks:
New WonResidential Trash (Tons Per Pickup Day)
3.748
8.499
6.831
5.155
24.234
Husber of Trucks Req'd e 7 Tons Per load and 3 loads Per Day
0.178
0,105
0.325
0.245
1.15/
Cost: s60,000 Per Trash Truck
$10,708
124,284
$199518
$14,729
1699239
Roll On/Roll Offs;
Ner Non -Residential Garbage and Trash (Tons Per Pickup Day)
7.446
16.949
13.663
10.310
48.467
a
Husber of RO/ROs Req'd R 1 ROM Per 2 Trash or Garbage Trucks
0.167
0.379
0.30
0.230
1.Q82
i
Cost, $10,000 Per Roll On/Roll Off
11,673
13,794
131050
12,301
1101819
Tractors with Hoists,
Nor son-Res:oential 0#r0;gt and Trash (Tons Per Pickup pay)
7,496
16,999
13.663
10.310
40.467
Husber of Tractors Req'd ! i Tractor Per 2 Trash or Garbage Trucks
0.167
0.379
0.305
0.230
1.082
Cost; ;120,QOp Per Tractor
s20,Q78
145,532
136496
$27,617
1129,024
Cranes,
Nyapsr of Cr #nes Req'd ! I Crane per t Trash Trucks
011119
0.202
0,163
0. l23
O. Q77
Co:t, i130,000 Per Crane
111,601
126,308
R1110
MOP
i75,009
TOTAL,
t09,616
513,382
1118,779
;S82,OB+1-
19�,865
1042 '
i
flags:;
1998-90
1190-95
1915-2000
2000.05
TOTAL
Garbage INICks:
-------------------------------------------------------
--
4ev Non -Residential Garbage (Tons Per Pickuo Day)
0.621
1.289
0.966
0.128
3.803
Husber of Trucks Req'd 8 12 ions Per load and 2 Loads Per Day
0.026
0,054
0,040
01039
O.158
Cost: 1100,000 Per Garbage Truck
12,589
15,370
$4,024
13,865
115,849
—
Trash Trucks:
Her Non -Residential Trash (Tons Per Pickup Day)
0.621
1.289
0.966
0.928
3.803
-
Husber of Trucks Req'd 9 7 Tons Per Load and 3 Loads Per Day
0.030
0.061
0.046
0.044
0.181
Cost: $60,441 Per Trash Truck
$1,775
$3,682
$2,761
$2,650
5119867
-=
Roll On/Roll Offs:
New Non -Residential Garbage and Trash (Tons Per Pickup Day)
1.243
2.577
i. -
!,°::
'.6V7
Husber.of RO/ROs Req'd 8 1 ROM Per 2 Trash or Garbage Trucks
0.028
0.058
0.043
0.041
0.170
Cos:: $10,000 Per Roll On/Roll Off
1277
1575
1431
$414
11,698
Tractors with Hoists:
Hew Non-kesident►al Garbage and Trash (Tons Per Pickup Days
1.243
2,577
1.932
1.855
7,607
Husber of Tractors Req'd @ 1 Tractor Per 2 Trash or Garbage Trucks
0.028
0.053
0.043
1.041
0.1,0
Cost: $120,000 Per Tractor
13,328
16,904
$5,174
$4,969
$20,376
Cranes:
Number of Cranes Req'd I 1 Crane per 2 Trash Trucks
0,015
0.031
0.023
0.022
0.091
Cost: s130,000 Per Crane
t11923
S39981
$2,990
$2,371
111,773
{y
TOTAL
.
$9,893
1209519
115,379
$U ,770
$61,561
Allapattah:
1988-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Garbage Trucks: ------•---------------------------------------------------
New Non -Residential Garbage (Tons Per Pickup Day)
2.953
6.370
5.382
3.901
18.646
Musber..of Trucks Req'd 1 12 Tons Per Load and 2 loads Per Day
0.123
0.265
0.224
O.163
0.775
' Cost: 5100,000 Per Garbage Truck -
112,306
$26,542
122,424
$16,255
177,521
{
Trash Trucks:
Ner Non -Residential Trash (Tons Per Pickup Day)
2.953
6.370
5.382
3.901
18.606
Husber of Trucks Req'd 17 Tons Per Load and 3 loads Per Day
0.141
0.303
0,256
0.186
0.886
Cost; 160,000 Per Trash Truck
18,436
$18,200
$15,376
111,146
153,161
Roll On/Roll Offs;
Kew Non -Residential Garbage and Trash (Tons Per Pickup Day)
5.907
12.740
10.763
7.803
37,213
Husber of RO/ROs Req'd 0 1 RO/RO Per 2 Trish or Garbage frucks
0,132
Q,284
0.240
0.174
Q.831
Costs 110,000 Per Roll OnlRoll Off
11,318
12,844
12,403
11,742
18,306
a
Tractors rith Hoists;
Nov N9n-Resi0en0il•6ar0age and Trash (Tons Per Pickup Day)
5.907
12.140
10,763
1.803
37.213
Moor of Tractors RW 4 0 1 Tractor Per 2 Trash or Garbage Trucks
01132
0.204
0.240
0,174
0.831
Cost; 1120,000 Per Tractor
115,822
$34,126
120,630
120,900
$990670
►iurper of Cranes Req'd ! 1 Crane per 2 Trash Trucks
01070
0.152
0.120
0.093
0.443
450 $1300004 Per Crone
s9,142
s19,71y
s16,451
s12,075
s67,391
I
TOTAL
$47, 026
f 10ON
115,610
1624118
$216,164
Virginia Key:
1188.50
1110-15
1195.2000
2000-05
TOTAL
GarbaneTrucks:
----------------------------------------------�.----�_--
New Mon -Residential Garbage (Tons Per Pickup
Day)
0.450
1.875
0.000
0.000
2.325
Huiber of Trucks Req'd 0 12 ions Per Load and 2 loads Per
Day
0.019
0.078
0.010
0.000
0.417
Cost: 1100,000 Per Garbage Truck
111875
$7,813
$0
10
19,688
Trash Trucks:
New Non -Residential Trash (Tons Per Pickup Day)
0.450
1.875
0.000
0.000
2.325
Mustier of Trucks Req'd 8 7 Tons Per Load and
3 Loads Per
Day
0.021
0.089
0.000
0.000
0.111
Costs 166,004 Per Trash Truck
11,286
13,357
if
11
169643
Roll On/Roll Offs:
New Non -Residential Garbane and Trash (Tnnc
Per Pirtiip
Day)
0.900
3.750
0.000
0.000
4.650
Husber of RO/ROs Req'd 8 1 ROM Per 2 Trash or Garbage
Trucks
0.020
0.084
0.000
0.000
0.104
Cost:. $1.0,000 Per Roll On/Roll Off
$201
1837
s0
s0
11,038
Tractors vith Hoists:
_
4ev Non -Residential Garbage and Trash (Tons
Per Pickup
Day)
0.900
3.750
0.000
0.000
4.654
Husber of Tractor Req'd 8 I Tractor Per 2 Trasn or Garbage Trucks
0.020
0.034
0.000
0.000
0.104
Cost: 1120,000 Per Tractor
12,411
110,045
f0
s0
112,455
Cranes:
Musber:of Cranes Read 0 1 Crane per 2 Trash Trucks
0.011
0.045
0.000
0.000
0.055
Cost: 1130,000 Per Crane
$1,393
$5,344
s0
10
1711%
TOTAL
17,165
129,855
$0
s0
137,020
TOTAL SOLID PASTE MOH-RESIDEHTIAL COSTS
1998-90
1990-95
1995-2000,
2000-05
107AL
Edison
124,137
151,076
143,562
135,255
$154,030
Downtown
3939192
330,359
251,346
273,264
1,253,161
Coconut Grove
299511
31,916
33,473
31,428
126,328
Little Havana
59,676
135,332
108,772
82,083
385,863
Flagm
9,892
20,519
15,379
14,769
61,559
Allapattah
47,026
101,429
35,609
62,118
2969262
Virginia Key
7,165
29,854
0
0
37,019
Total
$570,599
$700,485
s5381Z21
1513,917
$2,313,222
$GtID PASTE - AON*REBIDENTIAL COEFFICIENTS
Edison f0.i19
Downtown 0.119
a Coconut Grove 0,119
i : i 1t1 P HOvini 0.119
z Fl4gie: 0.119
Allipittilh O+a19 '
!' Virgin:4 Kev i0,119
:EHERAL SERUIM 45MIHISTRVION - ;ESIDENTTAL USTt
OIID YASTE EOUIPMEHT:
Additional Solid Yaste Eoutpaent Required by Projetted New Residential Deveiookoht:
Edison
toNntown
Coconut Grove
Little Havana
Flagari
Allapattah
Virginia Key
Total
198940
1990-?5
1995-2000
2000.95
TOTAL
0.018
0.137
0.154
0.216
0.525
1.827
2.331
2.732
2.900
1.790
0.032
0.616
0.410
0.577
1.685
0.046
0.342
0.256
0.288
0.932-
0.127
0.137
0.102
0.144
0.411
0.419
0.137
1.112
1.216
1.465
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
2.009
3.700
3.757
4.142
Parking Arta Required for New Equipment (it 420 sq. ft. per item of equipaent):
1988-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
8
57
65
9l
220
Downtown
767
171
1,148
11218
4,112
Coconut Grove
35
259
172
242
708
Little Havana
19
144
108
121
i12
ffagaiii
12
53
43
61
173
Aliipattah
4
53
43
91
1,15
Virginia Key
0
0
0
0
0
Total 844 1,554 11578 1,824 51800
Costs of Parking Area Required for New Equipment (it 162.50 per square foot):
1988-SO
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
$480
13,538
$4,034
fs,673
s13,7 9
Downtown
47,948
61,196
71,721
76,131
256,997
Coconut Grove
2,153
16,168
10,765
15,141
4412.12
Little Havana
1,199
8,903
6,723
7,570
24,475
Flagaw: .
719
31597
2,689
3,785
10,710
Allapattah
240
3,597
2,669
51678
12,203
Virginia Key
0
0
0
0
0
Total
152,744
$97,130
198,6Z0
1113,983
1362,476
hechw c; Required to
Service Nov Heavy
Equipment (it one
mecnanic for
every
30 petes of -heavy
equipment.)•
.
19@8.90
1990-95
1995-2090
3 00-85
TOTAL
,.
Edison
-re'e+•........... y..-.w----
0.011 -0,Q05
.......... ..-sws-----
0,105 0,007 0.01J
DorntQrn
0.061
0.070
0,091
0, 097
D, 3Z6
Coconut Grove
Q.003
Q-121
01014
01019
0.056
Tittle Havana
0.0Q2
9101.1
O.Q09
0.01Q
9,031
F14g4ei
1,OQ1
0,015
O,i103
0,005
0,014
Atl4pettin
0,000
O,OQS
�,013
0,107
Q,015
Virglma toy
01100
0,100
Q,100
0,Q00
01000
Iota)
01067
0,33
0�120
0�#1S
0
14
f
0
York Bay Area Requ:red
to Service Nov Heavy
Equipment tat 750 so. ft.
for
every nee heavy equipment
WNW added):.
1908-90
1910-55
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
DOYntoiin
45.665
58.282
68.306
72.506
244.759
Coconut Grove
21055
i5.398
10.252
14,421
42.125
Little Havana
1.142
9.556
6.402
7.210
23.310
Flags
0.685
3.425
2.561
3.645
10.276
Allapattah
04222
3.425
2.561
5.417
11.622
Virginia Key
0.018
1.101
1.011
1.111
1.011
Total
50.232
92.504
93.923
103.555
345.215
York Bay Area Costs (at
1140 per square foot)
1988-90,
1990-95
1795-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
-----------f64-----------f473---
_--------
$538
--------- -----------------
Dovntovn
6,393
3,159
9,563
10,151
34,266
Coconut Grove
288
2,156
11435
2,019
5,398
Little Havana
160
1,198
896
1,009
3,263
Flagami
96
480
359
S05
1,439
Allapattah
32
480
359
757
1,627-
Virginia Key
0
0
0
0
0
Total
17,033
$12,951
$13,149
$15,198
$48,330
Employee Parking Spaces
Required for Additional Mechanics (at 160 square fee of parking
space for
every tvo nev heavy equipment mechanics added):
1988-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
--------- ---------- 0,049
0.365
0.410
Q.577
1.400
0ovntovn
4,071
6.217
7.286
7.734
26.108
Coconut Grove
0.219
1.642
1.494
1.538
4.413
Little Havana
0.122
0.913
0.683
0.769
2.486
Flagami
0,073
0.365
0.273
0.385
1.016
Allapattah
0,024
0,365
0.273
0.577
1.240'
Virginia Key
01000
0.000
0.400
01000
0.000
Total
5.358
9.867
10.018
11.579
36,823,
Employee Parking Spase Costs (at 162,50 per
square foot
per parking space)
1988-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
e_••wwww.+.tswne•sw••►ssw..:es..wswwwe..�.wors5.v"swwerwww..•w►_wewwre.wes•w
f3 t23 ;26
. x
s36 387
Downtown
304
381
455
48$
11632
Coconut Grove
14
103
63
96
281
Little Havana
;1
g,
43
48
155
FT4gm-
69
allilpi�4ih
4
23
!1
6
�y
airgrnii Rey
0
0
0
0
0
T4t4l
$335
1617
$626
s 2#
12,901
104
Total Residential Solid Vaste tou:oreht-Related Costs:
1988-90
1990-95
1115.2000
2000-05
TOTAL
SAison
--- --------------------
1547
------------------------------
$4,099
14,597
----------
16,474
-------... --
115,;04
�onntdvh
54,646
69,744
819739
$6,766
2929815
Cotonut Oroue
2,459
18,427
129268
17,256
50,410
Little Havana
11366
10,238
71662
81628
27,894
Flagami
820
4,459
31065
41314
12,217
M lagattah
273
4,099
31065
61471
13,909
Virginia Key
0
0
0
0
0
Total
1609111
1110,697
$112,315
1129,104
1413,107
3
11
iENERAL StRU10ES ADMINISTRATION - RESIDENTIAL COSTS
POLICE EQUIPMENT
Residential teoatt Fee Coats of Police Service: 1198 - 2005
00-50
1190.15
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
-----------------
Edison
1514
--------------------------------
t39845
14,323
--------- _
$6,085
------ -------
t14,767
Downtown
549080
69,022
809893
85,868
289,863
Coconut Grove
2,6C1
11,565
139026
18,322
53,5,4
Little Havana
19285
9,628
71205
81114
269232
Ftagasi
771
31855
2,882
41057
11,-65
Allapattah
257
31855
2,882
61185
13,071
Virginia Key
0
0
0
0
0
Total
159,518
1109,770
$111,211
11289531
1409,030
Sworn Officers Required at
an Average Cost
of t21,744:
1988-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
-----------------
Edison
0.024
--------------------------
0.177
ft-------------------------------
0.199
0.280
0.679
Downtown
2.487
3.174
3.720
3.949
13.331
Coconut Grove
0.120
0.900
0.599
0.843
2.462
Little Havana
0.059
0.443
0.331
0.373
1.236
Flagaai'
0.035
0.177
0.133
0.187
0.532
Allapatt:h
0.012
0.177
0.133
0.230
0.01
Virginia Key
0.000
0.001
0.010
0.000
0.000
- Total
2.737
5.049
5.115
5.911
18.811
Required Additional Vehicles (at 2.5 sworn officers per vehicle):
1988-90 1990-95 1995-2000 2000-OS
TOTAL
Edison
------------------
----------0
01009
0.071
--- --------
080
- -----------------
0,2
0.272
Downtown
0.995
1.270
1.488
1.580
5.332
Coconut Grove
0,048
0.360
0.240
0.337
0.985
I little Havana
0.024
0.177
0.133
0.149
0.493
?' Flagaai
0.014
0.071
0.153
0.075
0.213
Allapattah
0.015
0.071
0.053
0.112
0.241
Virginia Key
0.000
01000
0.000
0.000
0.000
s' Total
1.095
2.019
2.046
2.364
7.524
Required Vehicle
Mechanics (at one aechanic
per 47 new
vehicles):
1908-90
1990-95
1995f2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
fOlff!lffO!!!lffffOflffOOfffff...........flff lf!lffffflffff...Offffffff!!?f} '
O,Q00 Q1002 0.002 0.002 0.006
DoMntorn
0,021
0.027
0.132
01034
01113
Coconut Grove
0.001
0.019
0.005
1.007
0.021
Little Havana
01011
0.004
0.403
01003
01010
Flagaei
0.000
01002
0.001
010Q2
0.005
Allapattah
41440
0,102
01401
0.002
O,Qu5
Virginia Key
0.010
0.001
0.000
0.001
Q.000
..': total
0.023
0.043
0.044
Q,OS4
-0.1b0
York Bay Area
Required to Service New Vehicles kit
285 sd-
ft. for every new vehicle
aeehahie added)
1988-90 1190-95
1995-2000
2001-45
TOTAL
Edison
---------- -............ -------------------
0
0
-------------
-----------------
-1
2
Gowntovn
6
3
9
10
32
Coconut Grout
0
2
l
2
6
Little Havana
0
1
1
1
3
Flagaii
0
0
0
0
I
Allapattah
0
O
1
1
1
Virginia Key
0
0
0
0
0
Total
7
12
12
14
46
York Bay Area Costs (it $140 per square foot):
1988-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
.......... --------------------------------------------------------
18
$60
$68
195
$231
Downtown
345
1,078
- 1,263
1,341
41527
Coconut 6rove
41
306
203
286
836
Little Havana
I50
113
127
410
Flagari
12
60
45
63
181
Allapattah
4
60
45
95
204
Virginia Key
0
0
0
O
0
Total
t929
s1,714
11,737
s2,007
$6,338
Parking Area Required
for Rev Equipment (at
160 sq. ft.
per police vehicle);
1988-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2001-15
TOTAL
Edison
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2
11
13
18
43
Downtown
159
203
238
253
853
Coconut Grove
8
58
38
54
158
Little Havana
4
18
21
24
77
F)agasi
2
ll
8
12
24
Allapattah
I
11
8
18
38
Virginia Key
0
0
0
0
0
Total
175
323
327
378
1,204
Costs of Parking Area Required For Her Equipment (it 162.10 per square foot);
1998.90
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
.
Edison
awwwwwwwre.aw.w.wwe.awe-we..............................
a 115 1717
................
$795 s1,119
12,717
Oovntovo
99948
12,617
14,881
15,796
53,323
Coconut 0rovt
400
30519
21396
31370
91846
x little Havana
236
1,771
11325
11493
4,416
F 1 a941 i
142
701
$30
746
21127
AI►aPast4A
47
709
530
11119
21406
Virg+nia KtY
0
0
0
D
0
Total
$10,749
120,493
120,458
$23,644
175,245
n
Eaployee Parking
Spates Reouired for Additional Mechanics (at 160 square
fee of parking
space for
dvtry two new heavy equipaent aechanics
added):
198840
1990-95
1195-2000
2010-05
TOTAL
Edison
--------•----------------------------------------------------------------
0.016
0.120
-
0.135 0.191 0.462
Downtown
1.693
2.161
2.533
2.681
1.076
Coconut Grove
0.082
0.613
0.408
0.574
1.676
Little Havana
0.040
0.301
0.226
0.254
0.821
Flagm
0.024
0.121
0.090
0.127
0.362
AlIapattah
0.019
0.121
0.490
1.191
0.410
Virginia Key
0.000
0.410
0.000
0.011
1.104
Total
1.864
3.437
3.482
4.125
12.808
Employee Parking
Space Costs (at 162.50 per square foot
per parking space)
1988-90
1190-95
1195-2000
2004-05
TOTAL
Edison
-------------------------
it
--------------
18
---..... --
$8
--- -------------
$12
--------•-
$21
Downtown
106
135
158
168
567
Coconut Grove
5
33
25
36
105
Little Havana
3
19
14
16
51
flagali
2
s
6
3
23
Ailapattah
1
8
6
12
26
Uir9lnia Key
0
0
0
0
0
Total
ills
1215
$218
1252
1800
j
Total Residential
Police Equipsent-Related
Costs:
1988-90
1990 -95
1995-2000
2010-05
TOTAL
Edison
---------- --.-•-----------
1104
•--------------
f11S
--------------
f871
-•----------------.�
f1,226
12,476
Downtown
10,899
139910
16,303
11,305
53,411
Coconut Grove
526
3,943
2,625
31692
10,787
Little Havana
259
11940
1,452
10635
5,237
Flagaai
155
777
$81
Ole
2,331
Allapattah
52
777
Sol
1,226
2,636
Virginia Key
0
0
0
0
0
Total
111,995
$22,122
122,413
$25,903
182,433
k?'
39
39
r,
Total GSA Residential
touipaentakelated
Costs!
1908-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2000r115
TOTAL
— Edison
....................
$650
14,864
..rraa..
f5,468
f7,697
rr
-31$,6i9�
Do�ntorn
65,544
83,654
98,041
104,070
1519309
Coconut Grove
21985
22,369
14,893
20,947
61,194
Little Havana
11625
12,178
9,113
10,262
33,178
F1agm
975
4,876
31645
5,131
14,622
Allapattah
325
4i876
3,645
71697
16,543
Uirginia Key
0
0
0
0
0
Total
t
172,114
1132,817
$134,805
$155,88 4
14",531
i
F
3.
6.
F
t
3
t
•
10426
y^
4 Q
i
a
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION - 4014-RESIDENTIAL COSTS
SOLID VASTE MIPMEHTc
Wditional Solid Paste
Equipment Required
by Projected Mon
-Residential
Devel0010t:
1988-90
1190-95
1995-2000
2000-05 iOTAL
----- -------------
Edison
-----------------
0.307
------ ---------------------
0.649
----
0.554
0.448
1.958
Downtown
4.918
4.199
3.195
3.537
15.928
Coconut 0rovt
0.375
0.406
0.425
0.399
1.606
Little Havana
0.758
1.724
1.383
1.043
4.954
Flagami
0.126
0.261
0.1"
0.188
0.770
Allapattah
0.599
1.289
1.089
0.7"
3.766
Virginia Key
0.491
0.379
0.010
0.000
0.471
Total
7.253
3.103
6.W
b.in
Z9.402
-Pirkinq Area Required
for New Equipment (at
420 sq. ft.
per item of equipment):
1988-90
1990-95
4995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison.
-------•---129-----------•2
73--------
-233---
-----188•---•-------822
Downtown
2,091
1,764
1,342
1,485
6,690
Coconut Grove
Ilia
170
179
168
674
Little Havana
319
722
581
438
2,060
Flagaai
53
110
82
79
323
AtIapattah
251
541
457
332
11582
Virginia Key
38
159
1
0
198.
Total
3,046
31131
2,a13
21630
i2,249
Costs of Parking Arta
Required for New Equipment (at $62.50
per square
foot)!
1988-90
1190-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
-----------------------------------------------------•-----------------
s11,041
$149535
$11,763
$51,392
Downtown
131,187
110,223
83,861
92,842
410,112
Coconut Grove
9,846
10,649
11,168
10,486
42,149
Little Havana
19,911
45,153
36,291
27,387
128,742
Fl again i
3,301
6,846
5,131
41920
20,266
Allapattah
15,690
339841
28,590
20,725
98i847
Virginia Key
2,391
31961
0
0
129352
Total
1190,370
1233,714
1179,576
$168,130
$771,799 ,
Mtcnanics Required to
Service Her Heavy
Equipment (at one mechanic for every
30 p►eces of heavy
equip%tnt);
1900.90
1990-95
1"5.2000
ZOOO.45
TOTAL
Edison
......wwwww.w.w.e..wwe wwsws,rw.wwv*we eswsawwwws•sw..n...........•.......
01010 0.022 0, 010 0.015
0,065
Downtown
0,167
0,�14Q
0,106
0,118
01531
Coconut Grout
0.013
11014
0,014
01013
6.054
041t, Howl
0.025
O.057
0,046
4.035
0.163
Flig4oI
Q,Q04
0.001
4.447
01406
046
A1lipattah
01021
1 0.043
01036
11016
0.14
Virginia Key
41410
44400
0,016
`
Total
0,i<4�
0417
Q.zzp
Q,t18
.0�981
e_
41
10 '
York Bay Area keouired to Service Met Heavy
Eouipsent (at 7SO sq. Ft.
for
every nor heavy
equipsent sechanic added)%
1988-90
1990-95
1195-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
----------------------------------
7370
16.231
--------------
13.842
-----------------------
11.203
49.945 '
Oovntovn
124.140
104.974
71.867
$8.421
3986202
Coconut Grove
1.377
10042
10.637
1.197
40.142
Little Havana
18.962
43,043
34,563
26.083
122.611
Flagasi
3.144
6.520
4.887
4.693
19:244
Allapattah
14.943
32.230
27.229
19.739
14,144
Virginia Key
2.277
9.497
1.001
0.111
11,763
Total
181.313
222.585
171.025
160,124
735,047
York Bay Area Costs
(at 1144 per square foot)
-
1988-10
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-45
TOTAL
Edison
-------------------------------------
sl 074
$2 272
- ----------
f1 S
--�-------------------
11 568
16 �52
Dovntovn
17,492
14,696
11,181
12,319
551148
Coconut Grove
1,313
1,420
1,489
11398
5,620
Little Havana
2,655
6,020
4,839
31652
17,166
Flagaii
440
913
684
657
2,694
Allapattah
2,092
4,512
31812 _
2,763
13,180
Virginia Key
311
1,323
0
0
11647
Total
$25,384
$31,162
123,943
122,417
$102,907
Eiployes Parking
Spaces Required for Additional Mechanics tat 160 square fee of parking
space to
every two nev heavy equiplient eechanics added):
1988-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
---------0.813-----------------------------------
1,731
1.477
1.195
5.221
Dorntovn
13.327
11.197
81519
9.432
42.475
Coconut Grove
1.000
1.082
1.135
1.063
4.282
'Little Havana
2.023
4.587
3.687
2.782
13.079
Flagasi
0.335
0.695
0.521
9.501
2.053
A1lipattah
1.594
3.438
2.904
2.105
10.042
Virginia Key
0.243
1.012
0.000
01000
1.255
total
19.340
23.742
18,243
17.080
78,405
Elpioyee Parking
Space Costs (at $62.50 per
square foot
per parking space)
1988-10
1990.95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
..................................
192 175
,.
1326
P9rncoen
833
700
$32
501
21655
Coconut Groye
63
68
71
67
268
tittle Haym
126
287
230
174
817
F1aQa�:
21
43
33
31
128
ailapartah
190
215
182•
132
448
Virginia Key
15
63
0
0
70
Total
11,209
111484
11,140
$1,067
14,901
11042
42
i
r
k.
Total Non -Residential
Solid Vaste Evuipaent-Related Costs:
198$-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-15
TOTAL
Edison
---- --------------
t9,173
------- ft---
119,422
------ -----...........
$161565
$13,406
»......... ._-
158,574
Dovntown
149,511
125,619
951574
105,810
476,515
Coconut Grove
11,222
12,136
12,728
111951
48,037 _
little Havana
229692
51,464
41,361
31,212
146,725
flaga�i
3,162
71342
51848
51616
23,028
Allapattah
17,882
39,561
32,583
23,620
112,654
Virginia Key
21725
11,352
0
0
14,017
Total
$216,971
1266,361
1204,666
1191,615
1079,606
k-
(i '
11
4
�ANERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION - SON-REMENTIAL COSTS
POLICE E001PRENT
Mort -Residential tipact fee Costs of Police Service: 1988 - 2005
1988-90
1990.95
1945.2000
2000-45
fOTAI
Edison
--- ----------------
$57,139
-----.__---•----------------------_-_-----------..-----
$1200910
$103,124
$839458
064,631
0ovntovn
1300789
782,047
595,002
650,724
2,966,562
Coconut Grove
69,860
75,555
79,241
74,398
299,054
Little Havana
141,268
320,366
2571493
194,313
913,440
Flagim
23,418
48,574
36,406
34,963
143,361
Allapattah
111,323
244,109
202,849
147,050
741,331
Virginia Key
16,961
70,674
0
0
97,635
Total
f1,350;718
11,658,235
;1,274,::5
:1,:^.2,^56
-,5,476,uiq
.worn Officers Required
at an Average Cost
of $21,744!
1988-90
1990-95
_ 1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
---------2.628----------5.56t---------_4.743----------3.838
- - 16.769
Dorntom
42.307
35.966
27.364
10.215
136.431
Coconut Grove
3.213
3.475
3.644
3.422
13.753
Little Havana
6.497
14.734.
11.842
3.936
42.009
Flagm
1.477
2.234
1.674
1.608
6.593
Allapattah
5.120
11.043
9.321
6.763
32.2r.1
Virginia Key
0.780
3.250
0.000
0.000
4.030
Total 62.121 76.262 58.516 S4.861 251.840
Required Additional Vehicles (at 2.5 sworn officers per vehicle):
1988-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2004-03
TOTAL
Edison
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
t.051
2.224
1.897
1.535
6.703
povntom
17.123
14.386
10.946
12.118
54.573
Coconut Grove
1.285
1.310
1.458
1.369
5.501
Little Havana
2.519
5.893
4.737
3.575
16.804
flagas:
0.431
0.894
6.670
0.643
2.637
Allapattah
2,048
4.417
3.732
2.705
12.902
Virginia Key
0.312
1.300
0.000
0.000
1.612
Total
24.848
30.505
23.438
2t.945
100,736
Required vehicle
Mechanics (it one iechinic
per 47 new
vehicles);
1988-90
1190-95
1990-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
01022 0►041 0,040 0.033
0,143
Domtorn
0,364
0.306
0.233
0.250
1.161
Coconut Grove
0.017
01030
0.031
0.029
0.117
Little Havana
0.055
01125
01141
0.076
0.351
Fispal:
0.009
0.019
0,014
0.014
0.056
Allapattah
0.044
0►094
0.079
0.058
0,215
Virginia Key
0.007
R,0Y0
0,000
0.000
0,034
Total
9.5*9
0,649
0.499
0,461
2►143!
44'
Mork Bay Area Required to Service New Vehicles cat 285 SO- it. for every nev uenitie eethan(c added)
lies-90
1910-95
1995-2000
2001-05
TOTAL
Edison
----..-•------------------
-
-------------------------------------------
t3
12
Oovntown
104
87
66
73
131
Coconut drove
3
8
9
8
33
Little Havana
16
36
29
22
102
Flagaii
3
5
4
4
16
Allapattah
12
27
23
16
78
Virginia Key
2
8
0
0
10
Total
151
185
142
133
611
'fork Bay Ar•a rnctc (at.
1140 nor cgkljre
foot):
-
1988-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1892
$1,388
11,610
11,303
$5,614
Downtovn
14,536
12,213
31192
10,237
46,329
Coconut Grove
1,091.
1,180
1,238
1,162
4,670
Little Havana
6,206
5,003
4,021
3,035
14,265
flagami
366
759
569
546
2,239
Allapattah
1,139
31750
31168
2,296
101953
Virginia Key
265
1,104
0
0
1,369
Total
121,095
$25,897
$19,818
$18,630
$851519
Parking Area Required
for Nev Equipeent
(at 160 sq, ft.
per police vehicle):
1988-90
1998-95
1995-2000
2001-45
TOTAL
Edison
--------------------------------------------
168
356
304
2----------
,073
Dovntown
2,740
2$02
11751
1,939
8,132
Coconut Grove
206
222
233
219
DSO ,
Little Havana
416
943
758
572
2,689
Flagau
69
143
107
103
422
Allapattah
329
707
597
433
2,064
Virginia Key
50
208
0
0
"c`,8
Total
31976
4,881
3,750
31511
.16,118
Costs of Parking Area
Required for Hev Equipsent tat 42,50 per square
foot);
1980-90
1990-95
1995w2000
2000.05
TOTAL
Edison
.www.wew.ww.www.w.w...w..ww..wwwww..www.w.............wwwwwww.....www..w..w
s10,S11 S22,Z42 i18,971 $15,353 $67,077
porntom
171,227
143,864
109,456
121,170
545,7Z5
Eoconus 6rpve
12,851
130819
14,577
13,686
$5,014
Little Havana
251987
58,934
47,368
35,746
160,035
f 1 igae 1
41308
036
6,617
61432
2613,13
Allapattah
20,471
- 44,170
37,316
27491
1y91016
l rginia Key
31120
13,001
0
0
16,121
total
5248,484
1305,047
S234,385
M1,446
11,007,361
�1-0421;
Espioyee Parking
Spaces Required for Additional Rothanics cat 160 square
fee of parking
space for
every twa new heavy equipsent lechanics
added):
1188-90
1990-15
l995-2400
20b0-05
TOTAL
Edison
1.784
3.7$6
3.229
2.613
11.417
Oowntown
29.145
24.488
18.631
20.626
92.s39
Coconut Grove
2.187
2.366
2.481
2.330
9.364
Little Havana
4.423
10.031
8.663
6.084
28.602
Flagasi
0.733
1.521
t.140
1.095
4.484
A1lapattah
3.486
7.518
6.352
4.614
21.961
Virginia Key
0.531
2.213
1.000
1.001
2.744
Total
42.295
51.923
39.895
37.32
171,466
Eikployee Parking
Space Costs tat $62,50 per square foot
per parking space)
1986-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2004-05
TOTAL
Edison
-------------------------------------------2--------------------------1714
i112
s231
f20..
f163
3114
Oowntorn
1,822
11530
11164
1,189
5,806
Coconut Grove
t37
148
155
146
C.35
Little Havana
276
627
504
380
1,788
Flagass
46
95
71
68
131
allapsttah
218
470
317
288
1,373
Virginia Key
33
138
0
0
112
Total
$2,643
$3,245
129493
$2,335
110,717
Total Hon -Residential Police Equipsent-Related
Costs:
1988-90
1910-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
---------------------------
fll 535
........
fT4 361
---�-----------
f2Q 183
----------•--•--��-•-
f16 820
$73 485
Downtown
187,584
157,608
119,912
132,714
'097,359
Coconut Grove
140079
15,127
15,970
14,934
60,269
Little Havana
29,470
64,564
51,893
39,160
12.4,423
Flagasi
4,719
91709
7,337
7,046
28,892
Ailapattah
22,435
480390
40,081
29,635
141,341
Virginia Key
3,418
14,243
0
0
17,661
Total
$V2,222
1334,139
1256,776
$240,410
f1,f03,544
46 10426• lad
x
a
Total GSA Non -Residential
E4uiplent-Related
Costs:
1988-40 1990-?5
1995-2000
2000.05
TOTAL
_-------------
Edison
........
t20,693
.---------•---------..__.._._._..----
543,733
t31,347
-------
530,225
---------
i132,053
Dovntown
337,095
293,227
215,486
238,564
1,0741372
Coconut Grove
25$00
27,363
28,698
26,944
108,305
Little Havana
51,161
116,024
939253
70,372
330,810
F149asi
81481
17,591
13,184
12,662
519918
Ailapattah
40,316
86,958
73,464
53,255
253,993
Virginia Key
61142
25,595
0
0
31,737
Total
1489,188
1600,546
$4619432
1432,022
ti ,983,188
47
SECTION 4 - SUMMARY OF COSTS
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL
COSTS
STORK
SOLID
TOTAL
POLICE FIRE/RESCUE(2) PARKS
STREETS
SEVERS
PASTE
GSA
RESIDENTIAL
Edison
114,767
19,654
$168,205
$227,930
11139967
146,964
$18,679
1644,174
Downtown
2891863
394,357
39137064
5,639,665
21819,831
8751977
331,309
13t548,362
Coconut Grove
53,524
20,969
539,964
11388,362
694,179
150,762
61,194
2,918,954
Little Havana
26,232
111602
298,781
296,107
143,052
83,421
33,173
882,313
Flaoaat
I,565
0
131,721
329,308
164,153
36,776
14,627
687,150
Allagattah
13,079
0
148,970
227,698
113,843
41,593
16,543
$61,731
Virginia Key(i)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
S409,030
$436,582
14,425,001
$8,013,078
14,0491030
$1,235,493
1495,530
$11,146,744 -
101AL NON-RESIDENTIAL
COSTS
STORM
:OLID
TOTAL
POLICE
FIREiRESCUE(2) PARKS(3)
STREETS
SEVERS
YAS1E
GSA
`ION -RESIDENTIAL
Edison
1364,631
S25,926
SO
13809675
1190,336
$154,030
1132,053
11,247,651
Downtown
2,966,562
705,248
4,231,721
2,9$8,085
1,473,040
1,253,(61
1,074,372
14,614,1'i5
Coconut drove
299,054
269441
0
473,926
136;962
126,328
108,305
1,271,016
Little Havana
9131440
561912
0
673,886
336,941
385,863
330,810
2,697,912
Flagaui
143,361
0
0
275,287
1370641
66,559
51,918
6689766
Allagattah
741,331
0
0
325,864
412,930
296,262
253,993
214901380
Virginia Key
87,635
0
0
0
0
37,019
319737
156,391:
Total
SS,4761014
$814,587
14,237,727
$5,587,723
$2,7137350
52,313,222
11,9839183
$23,206,311
(1) No residential
developaent is
anticipated
in Virginia
Key.
No costs are
derived for Flagait,
Allapattah and, Virginia Kay due
to the excess capacity
J existing
fire/rescue facilities.
(3) only the Downtown District has an urban
parks deuelopient prograa.
SECTION 5 - SUMMARY OF IKPACT FEE-FELATEO COST.
TOTAL COSTS SY SERVICE
1988-40
1990-95
1915-2000
2.000-05
TOTAL
Police -Res.
159,518
$109,770
1111,211
1128,531
1449,030
Police -Mon -Res.
1,350,758
1,658,235
1,274,115
11192,91b
51476,014
Firt/Rescue-Res.
75,502
108,341
1219171
131,568
436,582
Fire/Rescue-Non-Res,
190,616
252,245
212,336
153,810
814,537
Parks -Res.
643,878
1,185,730
1,203,9IR
11311,475
4,425,001
Parks -Non -Res.
11329,630
1,117,152
849,959
940,986
41237,727
0treets-Res.
1,160,246
2,111,335
21189,063
21549,434
$1098,078
Street0on-Res.
•11378,768
1,638,146
1,325,282
1,245,527
5,587,723
Store Sewers -Res,
584,120
1,095,665
1,094,530
1,274,715
41049,030
Store
689,332
3191070-
662,637
622,761
2,793,5-40
Solid Vast# -Res,
179,775
331,064
?36,144
tM,510
1,235,493
Solid Vast# -Non -Res.
570,599
700,485
533,221
:03,917
2,313,2�2
GSA -Res.
72,104
132,817
134,805
155,004
495,0'30
GSA -Non -Res.
489,138
600,546
461,432
432,022
1,933,13
Total
18,782,084
$11,140,601
$10,515,324 111,117,046
$42,355,055
TOTAL COSTS BY DISTRICT
1988-90
1990-95
1995-2040
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
---------------------------------------------------------
1216,810
1570,073
1528,462
1532,480
11,847,825
Domtown
71075,314
7,113,079
6,753,604
71240,060
231182,557
Coconut Grove
436,187
1,387,197
1,045,195
1,310,591
4,179,970
Little Havana
460,821
1,270,306
1,012,911
346,247
3,580,285
Flagaui
155,051
455,646
341,071
404,148
11355,916.
Allapattah
416,333
1,018,177
$44,081
703,520
3,052,111
Virginia Key
30,268
126,123
0
0
156,391
Total
18,182,084
111,940,601
$10,515,324
511,117,046
$42 355,055
14 ,
49
a
a +�
SECTION 6 -
IMPACT FEE
COEFFICIENTS
RESIDENTIAL IMPACT FEE
COEFFICIENTS
STORM
SOLID
TOTAL
POLICE
FIRE/RESCUE
PARKS
STREETS
SEVERS
PASTE
GSA
RESIDENTIAL
Edison
10.019
$0.013
10.218
$0.295
10.148
$0.061
$0.024
$4.778
Downtown
1.114
0.121
0.157
4.282
0.141
0.444
0.118
0.676
Coconut Grove
0.017
0.007
1.174
0.448
0.224
0.049
0.420
1.9"
Little Havana
0.019
0.008
0.218
0.209
0.104
0.061
0.024
0.643
flaga�i
0.019
0.000
0.218
0.543
0.271
0.061
0.024
1.136
AIIapattah
0.119
0.004
0.213
0.333
0.166
0.061
0.024
0.821
;llirlinia Key
10.000
10.000
$0.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
f0.000
HON-RESIDENTIAL IMPACT
FEE COEFFICIENTS
z
_
STORM
SOLID
TOTAL
POLICE
FIREIRESCUE
PARKS
STREETS
SEVERS
PASTE
GSA
NON-RESIDENTIAL
Edison
10.283
$0.020
10.000
10.295
10.148
$0.119
10.102
$0.967
Downtown
0.283
0.067
0.404
0.282
0.141
0.119
0.102
1.318
Coconut Grove
0.283
0.025
0.000
0.446
0.224
0.119
0.102
l.201
Little Havana
0.233
0.018
0.000
0.209
0.104
0.119
0.102
0.833
Flagasi
0.283
0.000
0.400
0.543
`0:271
0.114
0.102
1.318
Allapattah
0.283
0.400
0.000
0.333
0.166
0.119
0.102
1.003
0irginii Key
$0.283
$0.401
10.001
10.001
$4.004
10.119
14.102
$1.504
SECTION 7
- EXEMPTED
SQUARE FOOTAGE
SINGLE FAMILY (CITYVIDE)
1988-90
1990-95
1995-2000.
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
---------------------------------------------------------
39600
31,200
33,601
48t011
116,410
Downtown
0
0
0
0
0
Coconut Grove
38,400
2834200
188,400
265,200
7759200
Little Havana
71200
40,400
37,200
43,200
138,010
Fligall
81400
39,600
31,200
42,000
1219200
Allapattah
11200
20,400
14,400
32,400
68,400
Virginia Key
0
0
0
0
0
total
589300
424,800
-304,800
430,800
1,2t?,290
TARGET AREA DUPLEX
RESIDENTIAL
1988-90
1190-95
11195-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
------------------------------------------------------------
2,334
23,333
26,372
V ,107
r,1.1
Downtown
0
0
0
0
0
Coconut Grove
61598
21,237
16,521
21,688
669044
Little Havana
1,148
19,631
14,645
16,515
52,739
Flagasi
0
0
0
0
0
Ailapattah
156
20,068
15,051
31,535
67,610
Virginia Key
0
0
0
0
0
Total
11,836
84,274
'2,589
106,845
275,544
TARGET AREA MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
1988-90
1190-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
61063
60, 327
----------------------------
689735
16,715
232, 360
DowntowM
0
1,711,969
51057,158
5,404,736
12,173,863
Coconut Grove
31695
37,111
249688
34,752
1009246
Little Havana
21,468
2161598
161,589
182,217
531,312 '
flagaei
D
0
0
0
0
Allipattah
3,358
709519
52,889
110,815
237,C.31
Virginia Key
0
0
0
0
0
Total
34,624
2,097,024
5,365,05?
5,329,235
13,3Z5,942
e Includes Phase
11 (31210,000 sq,
ft,) end Phase
111 (317'0,000 sq,
ft,) of the
the proposed Overcown•Park Vest
residential
deveiopeent►
51
W
s
EXEMPTED DEVELOPMENTS OF REGIONAL IMPACT - <ESIDENTIAL (CITYWIDE)
t489.90 1490-95 995-2000 4000-05 TOTAL
Edison 0 0 0 0
Dorntoon 536,429 0 0 4 536,429
Coconut Grove ) D 0 0 0
Little Havana 0 0 4 0 0
flag��� 4 0 0 0 O
Aliapattah 0 0 0 0 0
Virginia Key 0 0 0 O 0
Total 536,129 0 0 0 536,929
DEVELOPMENTS Of REGIONAL IMPACT • NON-RESIDENTIAL (CITVYIDE)
1988-90 1990-95 1995-2004 2000-05 TOTAL
------------------------------------------------------------
Edison 0 0 0 0 J
Doentotin 1,467,104 1,000,000 0 1 2,467,104
fnconut Grove 0 0 0 0 0
Little Havana
•!
0
0
0
0
f 1 agar
0
0
0
0
0
Allapattih
0
0
0
0
0
Virginia Key
0
0
0
0
0
Total
11467,104
1,400,000
0
0
2,467,104
JOINT VENTURES -
RESIDENTIAL (CITYWIDE)
1988-90
1990-95.
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
0
36,000
0
0
36,000
Dovntoena
11200,000
2,640,000
0
0
' 31340,000
Coconut Grove
0
48,000
0
0
48,000
Little Havana
0
0
0
0
0
Flagasi
0
0
0
0
0
Allapattah
0
89,640
68,724 "
140,436
2989800
Virginia Key
0
0
0
0
0
tutai
1,200,000
l,313,640
68,724
140,436
41222,300
JOINT VENTURES •
NON-RESIDENTIAL
(CITVYIDE)
1988.90
1990-95
1995-2000
000.05
TOTAL
...ww.n.ww............w..wwww
.............................
Edison
0
0
0
0
0
2omtorn
0
172,200
0
0
232,20A
coconut Grove
0
0
0
0
Little Hama
0
0
0
7
9
FiOgalll
0
0
0
9
0
• v,rQ�n+a KA'9
0
0
0
0
0
Total
0
232,200
0
0
232,200
e Incluots Philp
I (3,841,000 sq,
fW of Averoon•Park Yaat
rralldentaal de 0990fris,
-
E
1042
SON -TARGET AREA LOY
AND MODERATE
14COME DUPLEX HOUS1HGx
1988=4
1990-95
1195-2000
1:000.05
TOTAL
Edison
2,433
13,531
15,014
21,047
$2,025
Dovntovn
0
0
0
0
0
Coconut Grove
15,101
130,132
4,940
121,7%
354,573
Little Havana
91226
659785
49,078
$5,343
179,431
Flagasi
4,200
11,800
15,660
21,000
60,600
Allapattah
1,122
30,166
23,075
47,833
102,995
Uirginia Key
0
0
0
0
0
_ Total
33,682
260,263
188,706
2669978
7491629
HOW -TARGET AREA LOY
AND MODERATE
INCOME MULTIPLE
FAMILY HOUS1HGx
1988-90
1990-95
1WS-7000
W -05
TOTAL
Edison
------------------------------------------------------------
41759
29,587
33,433
47,043
114,820
Domtom
118669600
11526,016
263,221
261,032
3,916,869
Coconut Grove
35,353
264,645
_ 176,056
247,824
723,877
Little Havana
9,0%
42,101
32,646
36,092
120,654
Flagm
12,000
60,000
44,400
62,400
178,800
Allapattah
1,921
15,141
110356
-5,593
54,610
Virginia Key
0
0
0
0
0
Total
1,929,638
19138,883
561,071
679,983
5,109,62.3
TOTAL EXEMPTED SQUARE FOOTAGE
1988-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
------------------------------------------------------------
19,209
194,483
1779154
249,911
6409756
Dorntoen
5,0709633
7,110,185
5,320,379
5,665,768
23,166,965
Coconut Grove
99,947
785,174
491,605
691,220
2,067,945
Little Havana
48,918
395,315
295,117
333,366
1,072,716
Fligam
24,600
119,400
11,200
125,400
360,600
Allapattah
9,357
246,534
185,494
339,611
829,996
Virginia Key
0
0
0
0
0
Total
5,272,663
8,051,009
6,560,949
7,454,276
23,138,976
TOTAL NOR -EXEMPT SQUARE FOOTAGE
1986-90
1990-95
1995-2000
100-05
TOTAL
wwww ww wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww ...
Edison
209,795
434,340
413,715
363,552
1,421,401
Dovntorn
1,154, 565
420,193
Z,367,686
2,591,040
7,333,486
Coconut Grove
298,375
614,893
4V42, 901
632,755
"088, 923
L i M a Havana
$17, 999
1,241,454
992, 527
173, 311
3430,211
211
F 1 agae s
98,561
?54, 026
150,302
210, 439
°51, 328
Allapattah
317,872
304,421
642,771
4490797
2,334,86$
Virginia Key
6090Q0
.30,pop
0
0
310,000
1
Total
3,537,166
4,019132w
111,137,1IQ
,Os5,s'i4
17,770,ki5
y
x Total non tarpt are; for iud 1Pderate InC0f 90111 an0
1009111 fasuly housing
is vrl"110 hers to 4e aoproislitely 50 percent of all Qruf0to nev
non target
arto Ouplei #n0 /Yltiple fiaily
re;i0enii4)
0tyelOplOI1L,
1042
a
.a
SECTION
8 - EXEMPTED kEVEHUES
(To 8e Paid
Fro& Other
City Revenues)
SINGLE FAMILY
(CITYWIDE)
-
1988-90
1990-95
1195-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
$2,801
124,274
126,141
$37,344
$90,559
Dovntovn
0
0
0
0
0
Coconut Grove
36,058
265,925
1769908
249,023
727,113
Little Havana
4,630
32,407
23,920
27,778
88,734
Flags i
9,542
44,986
35,443
47,712
137,683
Aliapattah
985
16,748
111822
26,600
56,156
Virginia Key
0
0
0
0
0
total
154,016
$384,340
1274,234
$388,457
$1,101,046
TARGET AREA DUPLEX
1998-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
111816
s18,157
$20,517
128,869
169,359
Oo>ntovn
0
0
0
0
0
Coconut Grove
6,196
19,942
15,513
20,365
62,015
Little Havana
1,253
12,623
91417
10,619
13,911
Flagasi
0
0
0
0
0
Allapattah
785
16,476
12,357
259890
551508
Virginia Key
0
0
0
0
0
Total 110,049 $67,197 157,304 $85,744 $2201714
TARGET AREA MULTIPLE FAMILY
1988-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2004-05
TOTAL
Edison
$4,733
$47,323
$539476
$759244
1180,776
Downtown
0
1,157,291
3,418,639
3,653,602
8,229,531
Coconut Grove
31470
34,847
23,182
32,632
14,131
Little Havana
13,017
139,273
103,902
1170166
374,157
Flagni
0
0
0
0
0
Al l apattah
2, 757
57,096
43,422
90,979
115,454
Virginia Key
0
0
0
9
0
Total
$24,776
$1,436,630
13,642,620
$3,969,6Z3
19,073,649
54
n
DEUELOPMEHTS OF REGIONAL IMPACT - �ESIDEHTIAL (CITYYIDE)
1900-90 1990-a5 1995-2000 2000-05 TOTAL
------------------------------------------------------------
Edison $0 10 i0 $0 s0
Dovntovn 362,964 0 0 0 3629964
Coconut Grove 0 0 0 0 0
Little Havana 0 0 0 0 0
Flagami 0 0 0 0 0
Allapattah 0 0 0 0 0
Virginia Key 0 0 O 0 0
Total 1362,164 SO s0 10 1362,964
DrvELUMMIS OF'REGIOHAL IMPACT = NON-RESIDEHTIAL (CITYYIDE)
1986-90. 1990-95 * 1995-2000 2000-05 TOTAL
----------------------------------------------------------»
Edison SO s0 �s0 s0 s0
Dovntovn 29051,011 1,393,000 0 0 3,449,011
Coconut Grove 0 0 0 0 0
Littlo Havana I �1 0 0 �j
Flagali 0 0 0 0 0
Allapattah 0 0 0 -0 0
Virginia Key 0 0 0 0-- 0
Total 1290519011 119398,000 to $0 $3,449,011
JOINT VENTURES - RESIDENTIAL (CITYYIDE)
1988-90 - 1990-95 1995-2000 2000-05 TOTAL
------------------------------------------------------------
Edison to 129,003 s0 $0 $28,008
Dovntovn 811,200 1,784,640 0 0 29515,840
Coconut Grove 0 45,072 0 0 45,072
Little Havana 0 0 0 0 0
Fl�ga�i o 0 0 0 0
Al lapittah 0 73,594 561422 115,298 2459315
Virginia Key 0 0 0 0 0
Total $811,200 11,931,314 $56,422 1115,298 12,914,235
JOINT VENTURES - NON-RESIDENTIAL (CITYYIDE)
1908-90 1990.95 1995-2004 10000-05 TOTAL
*wwwxwwwwwxwww�wwxx xwwxwxw wxws xxxwwxxxxxxwxwwx-wxwrxxwxx-wx-
Edison s0 s0 f0 s0 s0
Dorncown 0 324,616 0 0 324, 616
Coconut Grove 0 0 0 0 0
Little N�v+tna 0 0 0 9 0
Fla�aas 0 4 0 0 0
d114patt4h i � ) :'1
Virginia 4Y G 0 0 0 0
i0 1394,616 10 TO M4,616
ra
SON-1ARGET AREA LOV AHD MODERATE INCOME DUPLEX HOUSING
1988-90
1190-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
t19893
110,527
111,681
$16,374
140,475
Downtown
0
0
0
0
0
Coconut Grove
14,931
122,992
80,697
114,329
332,949
Little Havana
51932
429299
31,557
35,585
115,374
Flagasi
4,771
22,493
17,722
23,856
63,842
Allapattah
1,578
24,766
12,944
1q;274
24,,,W
Virginia Key
0
0
0
0
0
Total
129,105 -
$223,077
$160,601
1229,415
1642,198
NON -TARGET AREA
LeW AND MODERATE INCOME
MULTIPLE FAMILY HOUSING
1988-90
1990-95
.1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
139702
$23,018
126,010
$36,519
$89,330
Downtown
11261,822
1,031,536
177,937,
176,459-
2,647.,203
Coconut Grove
339196
2489501
165,317
232,707-
6791721
Little Havana
5,823
27,585
20,965
23,207
779581
Flagaoi
13,632
689160
50,438
70,886
203,117
Allapattah
11577
12,923
9,323
21,011
• 449834
Virginia Key
0
0
0
0
0
Total
11,3191752
tt,411,774
1449,911
$560,368
s3,742,385
TOTAL EXEMPTED
REUENUES
1989-90
1190-95
1995-2000
2900-05
TOTAL
Edison
------------------------------------------------------------
14,944
151,307
137,825
114,431
14981508
Downtown
4,486,997
5,696,133
31596,576
31830#059
17,609,765
Coconut Grove
93,050
737,278
461,617
649,056
1,141,800
Little Havana
31,454
254,187
189,760
214,354
689,756
Flagasi
27,946
135,633
103,603
142,154
409,642
Allapattah
71662
2029404
152,211
319,050
681,426
Virginia Key
0
0
0
0
0
Total $4,662,873 $7,176,949 14,641,672 15,349,404121,830,898
SECTION 9 - ANTICIPATED IMPACT FEE kEVENUES
(After Exelptions)
TOTAL IMPACT FEE -RELATED COSTS
ties -so 1998-95 1995-2040 2000-05 TOTAL
Edison
f216,810
15701073
1528,462
$532,480
t118471825
Dovntown
7,075,314
7,113,079
6,753,604
71240,060
23,182,557
Coconut Grove
436,927
1,337,117
110459195
1,310,591
4,1731970
tittle Naysna
460,821
11270,306
1,002,911
846,247
3,580,285
Flagau
1559051
455,646
341,071
404,148
1,355,116
Allapattah
406,333
100189177
844,081
783,520
31052,111
Virginia Key
30,266
126,123
0
0
t56,391
Total 13,732,084 111,940,601 110,515,324 $11,117,046 142,355,055
TOTAL EXEMPTED REVENUES
1988-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
-----------------------------------------------------------
1149944
$1519307
1137,825
$194,431
$498,508
Dorntoen
49486,997
596969133
39596,576
3,830,059
17,609,765
Coconut Grove
93,850
737,278
4619617
649,056
1,141,800
Little Havana
31,454
254,187
139,760
2141354
689,746
Flagami
27,946
135,638
103,603
142,454
409,642
Allapattah
71682
202,404
132,291
319,056
681,426
Virginia Key:
0
0
0
0
0
Total 14,662,373 17,176,949 $4,641,672 $5,349,404 121,830,318
ACTUAL ANTICIPATED IMPACT FEE REVENUES
1988-90
1990-95
1995-2000
2000-05
TOTAL
Edison
-----------------------------------------------------
1201,366
1418,766
1390,637
$338,049
$1,349,117
00mtown
21568,817
11416,946
3,157, 028
3,410,001
10, 572, 792
Coconut Grove
343,137
649,119
$83,578
661,535
w,2381170
Little Havana
429,367
11016,119
$13,151
631,893
2, 890, 529
FTa'94e1
127,105
3201000
2371468
261,694
146,274
Allapattah
399,651
815,773
691,790
464,470
2s370,685
Virginia Key
30,268
126,123
' 0
0
156,311
Total $41119411 14,763,652 15,073,652 15,767,642 120,524,157
57
1'04 6'
n
APPENDIX C
IMPACT .FEE —RELATED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
3
i
.. '+
51J�
7 i
t
�;
i ..
'�
-:'R'
,, 4
�
,r
!`{'
.,:
�;.
Planning District
A. Edison/Model City
B. Downtown
C. Coconut Grove
Police
Impact Fee Capital Projects
Cost Schedule
Summary
2-Year Period
1988-90
5-Year Periods 17-Year Period
1990-95 95-2000 2000-05 1988-2005
S57,653
S124,755
$107,447
S89,543
$379,398
984,869
851,069
675,895
744,592
3,256,425
72,471
95,120
92,267
92,720
352,578
0. little Havana
142,553
329,994
_264,698
202,427
939,672
E. Flagami
24,189
52,429
39,288
39,020
154,926
F. Al 1 apattah
111,580
243,964
205,731
153,153
714, 410'
G. Virginia Key
16,961
70,674
0
0
87,635
All Districts
$1,410,276
$1,768,005
$1,385,326
$1,321,437
$5,885,044
w � w
10426
Pot ice
Impact Pee Projects
Project description Sheet
Project game: 800 mhz Radio System Expansion
Project Area(s): Citywide
Project Justification:
With the addition
of residential and commercial space,
and the increase_of
employee and resident
population,
the Miami Police
Department will need
to increase
sworn personnel.
For every three officers
added to
the force, one 800 mhz portable radio will
have to be
purchased and added to the system.
Project Cost: $3,000
per radio
1988-1990
1990-1995
1995-2000 2000-2005
TOTAL
$64,854
$81,307
$63,708 $60,770
$270,639
4
10426,
Police
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Mobile Digital Terminal System Expansion
Project Area(s): Citywide
Project Justification: With the addition of residential and commercial
space, and the increase of employee and resident
population, the Miami Police Department will need to
increase sworn personnel. For every three officers
added to the force, one mobile digital terminal will
have to •be purchased and installed in a police
vehicle.
Project Cost: $5,480 for each Mobile Digital Terminal
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$118,471 $148,523 $116,376 $111,008 $494,378
0
Police
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Parking Expansion
Project Area(s): Edison, Allapattah
Project Justification: The addition of residential and commercial space, and
the increase of- employee and resident population
requires increases in sworn and civilian personnel.
Additional parking spaces must be provided at a rate
of two for every three sworn officers and one for every
two civilian personnel.
=x
Project Cost: $10,000 per parking garage stall
1988-1990
$71,343
1990-1995
1995-2000
2000-2005
TOTAL
$155,441
$132, 026
$102,305
$461,115
N
Police
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Parking Expansion
Project Area(s): Downtown, Virginia Key
Project Justification: The addition of residential and commercial space, and
the increase of- employee and resident population
requires increases in sworn and civilian personnel.
Additional parking spaces must be provided at a rate
of two for every three sworn officers and one for every
two civilian personnel.
Project Cost: $10,000 per parking garage stall
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$422,343 $388,581 $284,938 $313,899 $1,409,761
Police
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Parking Expansion
Project Area(s): Little Havana, Coconut Grove, Flagami
Project Justification: The addition of residential and commercial space, and
the increase of_ employee and resident population
requires -increases in sworn and civilian personnel.
Additional parking spaces must be provided at a rate
of two for every three sworn officers and one for every
two civilian personnel.
Project Cost: $10,000 per parking garage stall
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000
$100,844 $201,317 S167, 048
2000-2005 TOTAL
$140, 874 $610, 083
N
-4
Pol ice
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Building
Expansion/Modifications
Project Area(s): Edison,
Allapattah
Project Justification:
The addition of residential and commercial space, and
the increase of. employee and resident population
requires increases in sworn and civilian personnel.
The additional employees result in the need for
additional space or modifications in the police facili-
ties for offices, property bureau, classrooms and
other supplementary functions. While the need for
expansion is known, the exact locations cannot be
determined until manpower assignments are made based on
chan'9es in calls for service, crime patterns'and actual
service requirements that cannot be determined at this
time.
Project Cost: $7.5 per
square foot of expansion area
1988-1990
1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$75,883
$165,333 $140,428 $108,816S490,460
Police
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Building Expansion/Modifications
Project Area(s): Downtown, Virginia Key
Project Justification: The addition of residential and commercial space, and
the increase of_ employee and resident population
requires increases in sworn and civilian personnel.
The additional employees result in the need for
additional space or modifications in the police facili-
ties for offices, property bureau, classrooms and
other supplementary 'functions. While the need for
expansion is known, the exact locations cannot, be
determined until manpower assignments are made based on.
changes in calls for service, crime patterns and actual
service requirements that cannot be determined at this
time.
Project Cost: S75 per square foot of expansion area
1988=1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2d00-2005 TOTAL
$449,219 $413,3 08 $3 03,071 $333,874 $1,499,472
WIV
Police
Impact Fee Projects
Project Oescription Sheet
Project Name: Building
Expansion/Modifications
Project Area(s): Little
Havana, Coconut Grove, Flagami
Project Justification:
The addition of residential and commercial space, and
the increase of employee and resident population
requires increases in sworn and civilian personnel.
The additional employees result in the need for
additional space or modifications in the police facili-
ties for offices, property bureau, classrooms and
other supplementary functions. While the need for
expansion is known, the_ exact locations cannot be,
determined until manpower assignments are made based on
changes in calls for service, crime patterns and actual
service requirements that cannot be determined at this
time.
Project Cost: $75 per
square foot of expansion area
1988-1990
1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$107,261
$214,1219 $177,678 $149,839 $648,907
-10426
RDIM
LEE
i
Fire/Rescue
Impact Fee Capital Projects
Cost Schedule
Summary
Planning District
2-Year Period 5-Year
Periods
17-Year Period
1988-90 1990-95
95-2000
2000-05
1988-2005
A.
Edison/Model City
$4,812 $11,178
$10,074
$9,516
$35,580
B.
Downtown
246,221 307,864
292,084
253,436
19099,605
C.
Coconut Grove
5,735 17,092
12,573
12,395
47,410
D.
Little Havana
9,735 24,452
19,276
15,111
68,574
E.
Fl agami
0 0
0
0
0
F.
Allapattah
0 0
0
0
0
G.
Virginia Key
0 0
0
0
0
All Districts
$266,118 $360,586
S334,007
$290,458
$1,251,169
10 „
Fire/Rescue
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Expansion of Fire Station #12
Project Area(s): Edison
Project .Justification: The national average is one (1) emergency unit per
50,000 population. Expansion is needed to accommodate
a rescue unit and personnel recently added to Station
#12. A►, additional rescue unit is needed to respond
to increased service needs. This capital project will
cost in excess of.S20,000 with a life expectancy of 20
years. This is a new project with most funding
provided under Fire/Rescue-Bond Funds.
Project Cost: Estimated expansion cost $300,000.
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$4,812 $11,178 $10, 074 $9, 516 $35, 580
4 Fire/Rescue
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Hazardous Materials/Foam Apparatus
Project Area(s): Downtown
i
�t
Project Justification: New hazardous materials/foam apparatus is needed to
provide a means of handling the ever increasing threat
and volume of hazardous materials being transported
into and out of Miami through the Port of Miami, the
Miami River, and Biscayne Bay adjacent to the Downtown
Planning District. This project will cost in excess
of $20,000 with a life expectancy of 20 years.
Presently one (1) converted foam pumper and one (1)
van serve as a hazardous materials foam unit for
145,030 total population in the Downtown District.
Project Cost: Estimated hazardous materials/foam apparatus cost $300,000.
— 1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 20004005 TOTAL
$38,757 $48,460 $45,977 S39,893 $173,087
. +�
1 '4+S 46
i
i'
Fire/Rescue
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Renovation to Station #1 and an Emergency Medical Rescue Unit
Project Area(•s): Downtown
a
Project Justification: The national average is one (1) emergency rescue unit
per 50,000 population. EMS units are needed to
maintain acceptable response times to emergency
medical incidents and redupe the wear and tear on
large, heavy fire aparatus used for basic life support
responses. This project will cost in excess of
$20,000 with a life expectancy of 20 years. Present-
ly, there are no funds budgeted for this project.
Project Cost: A fully -equipped EMS unit: $93,000
Station #1 renovation, furniture, fixtures and equipment:
$110, 000
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995=2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$38,036 $47,558 $45,121 $39,150 $169,865
13
n
Fire/Rescue
Impact Fee Projects
Project De9cription Sheet
Project Name: Renovation to Station #4 and an Emergency Medical Rescue Unit
Project Area(s): Downtown
Project Justification: The national average is one (1) emergency rescue unit
per 50,000 population. EMS units are needed to
maintain acceptable response, times to emergency
medical incidents and reduce the wear and tear, on
large, heavy fire aparatus used for basic life support
responses. This project will cost in excess of
$20,000 with a life -expectancy of 20 years. Present-
ly, there are no funds budgeted for this project.
Project Cost: A fully -equipped EMS unit: $93,000
Station #4 renovation, furniture, fixtures and equipment:
$110,000
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$38,036 $47,558 $45,121 $39,150 $1691865
14
04W
t
Fire/Rescue
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Aerial Fire Apparatus and Rescue Equipment
Project Area(s): Downtown
Project Justification: The City of Miami has one (1) aerial apparatus per
71,301 population. Aerial apparati are needed to
conduct highrise firefighting and rescue operations.
This project will cost in excess of $20*000 with a
lifeexpectancy of approximately 20 years.
Project Cost: Fully -equipped aerial apparatus: $500,000
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$131,393 $164,288 $155,866 $135,243 $586,790
Fire/Rescue
Impact Fee Projects
Project bescription Sheet
Project Name: Emergency Medical Rescue Unit and Renovation to Station #8
Project Area(s): Coconut Grove
Project Justification: The national average is one (1) emergency rescue unit
per 50,000 population. EMS units are needed to
maintain acceptable response times to emergency
medical incidents and reduce the wear and tear on
large, heavy fire aparatus used for basic life support
responses. This project will cost in excess of
$20,000 with a life expectancy of 20 years. Present-
ly, there are no funds budgeted for this project.
Project Cost: Fully -equipped EMS unit: $93,000
Station #8 renovation, furniture, fixtures and equipment:
$110, 000
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-:2005 TOTAL
$5,350 $179 092 $12, 573 $12,'395 $47,410
1042
t
Fire/Rescue
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Emergency Medical Rescue Unit and Renovation to Station #8
Project Area(s): Coconut Grove
Project Justification: The national average is one (1) emergency rescue unit
per 50,000 population. EMS units are needed, to
maintain acceptable response times to emergency
medical incidents and reduce the wear and tear on
large, heavy fire aparatus used for basic life support
responses. This project will cost in excess of
$20,000 with a life expectancy of 20 years. Present-
ly, there are no funds budgeted for this project.
Project Cost: Fully -equipped EMS unit: $93,000
Station #8 renovation, furniture, fixtures and equipment:
$110,000
1988-1990
$5,350
1990-1995 1995-2000 20004005 TOTAL
$17, 092 $12, 573 $12,395 $47,410
c
Fire/Rescue
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Emergency Medical Rescue Unit and Renovation to Station #7
Project Area(s): Little Havana
Project Justification: The national average is one (1) emergency rescue unit
per 50,000 population. EMS units are needed to
maintain acceptable response times to emergency
medical incidents and reduce the wear and tear on
large, heavy fire aparatus used for basic life support
responses. This project will cost in excess of
$20,000 with a life expectancy of 20 years. Present-
ly, there are no funds budgeted for this project.
Project Cost: Fully -equipped EMS unit: $93,000
Station #8 renovation, furniture, fixtures and equipment:
$110, 000
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 20ON2005 TOTAL
$9,735 $24,452 $19,276 $15,111 .$68,574
17
6
PARKS, RECREATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES
i
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Capital Projects
Cost Schedule
Summary
Planning District
2-Year Period
5-Year Periods
17-Year Period
1988-90
199 0-95
95-2000
2000-05
1988-2005
A.
Edison/Model City
$5,853
$43,802
$49,238
$69,312
$1689205
B.
Downtown
1,914,970
1,864,221
1,725, 515
1,870,381
7,375, 087
C.
Coconut Grove
26,344
197,378
131,409
184,833
539,964
0.
Little Havana
14,635
109,665
82,065
92,416
298,781
E.
Fiagami
89781
43,908
32,825
46;207
131,721
F.
Allapattah
2,925
43,908
32,825
69,312
148,970
G.
Virginia Key
0
0
0
0
0
All Districts
$1,973,50B
$2,302,882
$2,053,877
S2,332,461
$8,662,728,
W 18 -
104
i
0
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Edison Mini -Park Enhancement
Project Area: Edison
Project Justification: Miami Park and Recreation standards •require .1 acre
per 1,000 additional residents.
Project Cost: At a cost of $4.00 per square foot, mini park enhancement is
anticipated to result in the following costs:
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$975 $7,300 $8,206 $11, 552 $28, 033
Parks and Recreation
Impact Pee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Downtown Mini -Park Enhancement
Project Area: Downtown -
Project Justification: Miami Park and Recreation standards require .1 acre
per 1,000 additional residents.
Project Cost: At a cost of $4.00 per square foot, mini park enhancement is
anticipated to result in the following costs:
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$97,556 $124,511 .$145,926 - $154,899 $522,892
-20�
104
1
13
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Downtown Mini -Park Enhancement
Project Area: Downtown
Project Justification: Miami Park and Recreation standards require .1 acre
per 1,000 additional residents.
Project Cost: At a cost of S4.00 per square foot, mini park enhancement is
anticipated to result in the following costs:
1988-1990 1990-199 5 199 5-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$97, 556 $124, 511 $145,926 - $154,899 $522,892
� r 1
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Coconut Grove Mini -Park Enhancement
Project Area: Coconut Grove
Project Justification: Miami Park and Recreation standards require .1 acre
per 1,000 additional residents.
Project Cost: At a cost of $4.00 per square foot, mini park enhancement is
anticipated to result in the following costs:
1988-199 0 1990-199 5 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$4,390 $32,896 121,901 $30,805 $89,992
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Little Havana Mini -Park Enhancement
Project Area: Little Havana
Project Justification: Miami Park and Recreation standards require .1 acre
per 1,000 additional residents.
Project Cost: At a cost of $4.00 per square foot, mini park enhancement is
anticipated to result in the following costs:
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$2,439 $18,277 $13,677 - $159402 $49,795
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Flagami Mini -Park Enhancement
Project Area: Flagami
Project Justification: Miami Park and Recreation standards require .1 acre
per 1,000 additional residents.
Project Cost: At a cost of $4.00 per square foot, mini park enhancement is
anticipated to result in the following costs:
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$1,463 $7,318 $5,471 $7,701 $21,953
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Allapattah Mini -Park. Enhancement
Project Area: Allapattah
Project Justification: Miami Park and Recreation standards require .1 acre
per 1,000 additional residents.
Project Cost: At a cost of S4.00 ner snuarp font_ mini nark pnhanramant is
t
S
i
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Edison Neighborhood Park Enhancement
Project Area: Edison
Project Justification: Miami Park and Recreation standards require .5 acre
per 1,000 additional residents.
Project Cost: At a cost of $2.00 per square foot, neighborhood park enhance-
ment is anticipated to result in the following costs:
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$2,439 $18,251 $20,516 $28,880 $70,086
1046
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Downtown Neighborhood Park Enhancement
Project Area: Downtown
Project Justification: Miami Park and Recreation standards require .5 acre
per 1,000 additional residents.
Project Cost: At a cost of S2.00 per square foot, neighborhood park enhance-
ment is anticipated to result in the following costs:
1988-1990
1990-1995
1995-2000
2000-2005
TOTAL
$243,892
$311,279
$364,815
-_ $387,248
$193 07,234
�R:4'4?�e!FT�Ffl'r'++&MTf 'fi:�ranxun,A M+ sa,ms ' ..:.+�*�•.aa+e;v-n.�n.'mmrva
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Coconut Grove Neighborhood Park Enhancement
Project Area: Coconut Grove
Project Justification: Miami Park and Recreation standards require .5 acre
per 1,000 additional residents.
Project Cost: At a cost of $2.00 per square foot, neighborhood park enhance-
ment is anticipated to result in the following costs:
1988-1990 1990-1995 199 5-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Coconut Grove Neighborhood Park Enhancement
Project Area: Coconut Grove
Project Justification: Miami Park and Recreation standards require .5 acre
per 1,000 additional residents.
Project Cost: At a cost of $2.00 per square foot, neighborhood park enhance-
ment is anticipated to result in the following costs:
1988-1990 1990-1995 199 5-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Little Havana Neighborhood Park Enhancement
Project Area: Little Havana
Project Justification: Miami Park and Recreation standards require .5 acre
per 1,000 additional residents.
Project Cost: At a cost of S2.00 per square foot, neighborhood park enhance-
ment is anticipated to result in the following costs:
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$6,098 $45,694 $34,194 - $38,507 $124,493.
}
10426 �
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Flagami Neighborhood Park Enhancement
Project Area: Flagami
Project Justification: Miami Park and Recreation standards require .5 acre
per 1,000 additional residents.
Project Cost: At a cost of S2.00 per square foot, neighborhood park enhance-
ment is anticipated to result in the following costs:
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$3,659' $18,295 S13,677 $19,253 $54,884
29
p
1042 T
EJ
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Allapattah Neighborhood Park Enhancement
Project Area: Allapattah
.Project Justification: Miami Park and Recreation standards require .5 acre
per 1,000 additional residents.
Project Cost: At a cost of S2.00 per square foot, neighborhood park enhance-
ment is anticipated to result in the following costs:
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$1,219 $18,295 S13,677 S28,880 $62,071
r
i
i
1
I,
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Oescription Sheet
Project Name: Edison Community Park Enhancement
Project Area: Edison
Project Justification: Miami Park and Recreation standards require 1.0 acre
per 1,000 additional residents.
Project Cost: At a cost of $1.00 per square foot, community park enhancement
is anticipated to result i-n the following costs:
i
i
1
I,
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Oescription Sheet
Project Name: Edison Community Park Enhancement
Project Area: Edison
Project Justification: Miami Park and Recreation standards require 1.0 acre
per 1,000 additional residents.
Project Cost: At a cost of $1.00 per square foot, community park enhancement
is anticipated to result i-n the following costs:
y
f
t
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Downtown Community Park Enhancement
Project Area: Downtown
Project Justification: Miami Park and Recreation standards require 1.0 acre
per 1,000 additional residents.
Project Cost: At a cost of $1.00 per square foot, community park enhancement
is anticipated to result in -the following costs:
1988-199 0 1990-1995 1995-2000 2 000-2005 TOTAL
$243,892 $311,280 $364,815 _$387,248 $1,307,235
32
112
and Recreation
:t Fee Projects
Description Sheet
nity Park Enhancement
and Recreation standards require 1.0 acre
additional residents.
Project Cost: At a cost of S1.00 per square foot, community park enhancement
is anticipated to result in the following costs:
1988-1990 1990-1995 199 5-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$10,977 $82,241 $54,754 - $77,014 $224,986
FA
0
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Little Havana Community Park Enhancement
Project Area: Little Havana
Project Justification: Miami Park and Recreation standards require 1.0 acre
per 1,000 additional residents.
Project Cost: At a cost of $1.00 per square foot, community park enhancement
is anticipated to result in the following costs:
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2 000-2005 TOTAL
S6,098 $45,694 $34,194 S38,507 $1249493
0 . #
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Flagami Community Park Enhancement
Project Area: Flagami
Project Justification: Miami Park and Recreation standards require 1.0 acre
per 1,000 additional residents.
Project Cost: At a cost of $1.00 per square foot, community park. enhancement
is anticipated to result in the'following costs:
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$3,659 S18,295 $13,677 $19,253 $54,884
.iC+.dfR6F'RR"sR4>�4`�+se✓± z .... .._... ._ .. ..
d
Jr
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: A1lapattah Community Park Enhancement
Project Area: Allapattah
Project Justification: Miami Park and Recreation standards require 1.0 acre
per 1,000 additional residents.
Project Cost: At a cost of S1.00 per square foot, community park enhancement
is anticipated to resultrn the following costs:
V
i
'FF
ti
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Bayfront Park Redevelopment - Phase II
Project Area: Downtown
Project Justification: This project involves the redesign of Bayfront Park by
Isamu Noguchi working in conjunction with the City's
design consultants. Funding is to be used for design,
the preparation of construction documents, and con-
struction administration connected with the redevelop-
ment of the entire park, and construction in the north
end. Anticipated funds would be for further design
and construction in the south end.
Project Cost: $7,400,000
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$445,323 $44 5,323
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Waterfront Park (Bicentennial Park and FEC Tract)
Project Area: Downtown
Project Justification: The plan recommends three primary concepts for the use
and structure of the park: open space, waterfront and
activities, along with a conceptual framework for
pedestrian and vehicular circulation, public access
and parking. The plan suggests two large commons
(open lawn areas) extending from Biscayne Boulevard to
the bayfront promenade, a major plaza connecting to
Biscayne Boulevard and a waterfront walkway bordering
the deep water slip. A two percent slope in the park
allows for the walkway edges of the slip to be raised.
and consequently -creates the opportunity to step down
with terraces to the water level. A pedestrian bridge
would cross the- slip resulting in a unique landmark
structure, a major promenade at the waters' edge' ;and
four pavillions housing special attractions (science
museum, omni-max theatre, etc.). Lining the south
edge of the slip could_ be temporary structures
sheltering'a variety of shows, exhibits and markets.
The northern quadrant of the park would be reserved
for field games, small concerts, playgroundsand a
visitor/tourist information center.
Project Cost: $23,958,000
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$1,441,764 $1,441,764
_ 38 -
0
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Brickell Park
Project Area: Downtown
Project Justification: Brickell Park is located at the entrance of Brickell
Avenue in close proximity to the downtown core. The
park is needed to serve the high population of employ-
ees and the increasing population..of teurisr: in -the
area. The project involves upgrading' of the park
through the construction of the Baywalk connecting
the Brickell Waterfront Developments and allowing for
the park to be the link to the bay, a special feature
at the entrance of the park at Brickell Avenue, which
will become a gateway to the park as well as for the
Brickell area, special park furniture - decorative
lighting and walkways. These improvements will serve
to maximize the use of the park and serve the employee
and visitor population.
Project Cost: $2, 047, 000
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$369, 558 $369; 558
i
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Brickell Promenade
Project Area: Downtown
Project Justification: This project involves land acquisition and development
of a new urban park in the area of SW loth Street and
South Miami Avenue. This park is needed to serve the
rapidly increasing office worker densities ii the -
Brickell area and to be the principal activity space
of the loth Street Brickell Promenade - a pedestri-
an/transit mall. It will also serve to attract future.
residential and office redevelopment in the transit
station area.
Project Cost: $3, 000, 000
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$541,609 - $5419609
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Pace Park
Project Area: Downtown
Project Justification: The project involves the construction of a Baywalk
along the Park's water frontage. The Baywalk is an
internal element of the Bay/Riverwalk system being
implemented throughout the downtown area. It will
ensure an attractive peaestrian link to our waterfront
while maximizing park use.
Project Cost: $700, 000
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995=2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$42,125 $42,125,
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Southside Park
Project Area: Downtown
Project Justification: This, project involves- upgrading Southside Park to
provide a range of active/passive activities for the
high density urban population projected for the
neighborhood around the Brickell Transit Station
Suggested improvements include a vita course; tennis
and raquetball courts',night lighting, a day, care
center and a plaza entrance adjacent to the transit
station. Southside Park is the only active recreation
neighborhood park for the area extending from
Biscayne Bay west to 1-95 and from SW 8th Street south
to 5th Road. . These improvements will serve to draw
private residential development in the area which
through taxes, improves the financial condition of the
City.
Project Cost: $700,000
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$42,125 $42,125
11
11
Project Name: Lummus Park
Project Area: Downtown
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Justification: This project involves a reorganization and redesign of
Lummus Park to become a neighborhood center and to
serve the growing employee population of government
center. Given the historic significance of the park,
the plan calls for facilities, workrooms and allows
for open areas for outdoor education activities and
special events. Other improvements for the park
include gateway features adjacent to the river and to
government center, a cafe/restaurant and additional
seating areas. These improvements will act as a
gateway to -promote revitalization and urban growth in
the neighborhood while maximizing the use of the park
as the link to the neighborhood.
Project Cost: $1, 000, 000
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$60,179 $60,179
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Biscayne Boulevard
Project Area: Downtown
Project Justification: Biscayne Boulevard is downtown Miami's front doorstep,
a major thoroughfare and a barrier between the City
and the Bayfront Park system. A major redesign of the
boulevard is needed to create a world class image for
the City and to provide attractive pedestrian linkages
to Bayfront. Phase I includes sidewalk expansion,
pedestrian crosswalks, decorative paving; decorative
lighting, street furniture and landscaping through
the 'boulevard from Miami River to NE 18th Street.
Phase II of the project calls for a major widening of
the boulevard between NE 5th Street and I-395 to
include a center median with parking and landscaping
and gateway features adjacent to the Miami River
seaport entrance and I-395.
Project Cost: $6,000,000
1988-1990 1990-1995 199 5-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$361,073 $361,073
.. 44 .
Parks and Recreation
Impact Pee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Biscayne Boulevard
Project Area: Downtown
Project Justification: Biscayne Boulevard is downtown Miami's front doorstep,
a major thoroughfare and a barrier- between the City
and the Bayfront Park system. A major redesign of the
boulevard is needed to create a world class image for
the City and to provide attractive pedestrian linkages
to Bayfront. Phase I includes sidewalk expansion,
pedestrian crosswalks, decorative paving, decorative
lighting, street furniture and landscaping through
the boulevard from Miami River to NE 18th Street.
Phase II of the project calls for a major widening of
the boulevard between NE 5th Street and I-39 5 to
include a center median with parking and landscaping
and gateway features adjacent to the Miami River
seaport entrance and I-395.
Project Cost: $6, 000, 000
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL.
$361,073 $361,073
0 44 e
0 40'
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Biscayne Boulevard
Project Area: Downtown
Project Justification: Biscayne Boulevard is downtown Miami's front doorstep,
a major thoroughfare and a barrier between the City
and the Bayfront Park system. A major redesign of the
boulevard is needed to create aworld class image for
the City and to provide attractive pedestrian linkages
to Bayfront. Phase I includes sidewalk expansion,
pedestrian crosswalks, decorative paving; decorative
lighting, street furniture and landscaping through
the 'boulevard from Miami River to NE 18th Street.
Phase II of the project calls for a major widening of
the boulevard between NE 5th Street and I-395 to
include a center median with parking and landscaping
and gateway features adjacent to the Miami River
seaport entrance and I-395.
Project Cost: $6,000,000
1988-1990 1990-1995 199 5-2000
$3619073
2000-2005 TOTAL
$361, 073
N
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Flagler Street
Project Area: Downtown
Project Justification: Flagler Street is the downtown east -west urban highway
functioning as a typical "mainstreet". This project
involves the, implementation of planning and urban
design guidelines that will insure Flagler Street's
improvement in this physical; economic and social
environs and still maintain its unique and competitive
retail edge. Improvements call for:
(1) rerouting of taxi and bus operations, service
traffic and automobile traffic which will
alleviate existing congestion;
(2) improving pedestrian zones and activities such
as redesigning special activity areas, rede-
signing and widening_ sidewalks, redeveloping
architectural and landscape guidelines to
create a unique streetscape.
Project Cost: $7,500,000
1988-1990 199 0-199 5
1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$451,341 $451,341
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project !lame: Ri verwal ks
Project Area: Downtown
Project Justification: Miami's waterfront, both public and private, lack
continuity and access. This project calls for the
development of a bay/ ri verwa I k along the City's
waterfront linking major public attractions and
private developments. This linkage will encourage
growth and revitalization of our waterfront properties
by attracting mixed commercial and residential devel-
opment to Miami's_ water's edge
Project Cost: $200,000
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$12, 036 $12, 036
46
142
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: S.E. 12th Street Park
Project Area: Downtown
Project Justification: This project calls for the development of a new
waterfront urban park in the area of Brickell through
the use of the public right-of-way. The S.E. 12th
Street park will become the gateway to the Brickell
waterfront and the catalyst for future' retail
development in this area. It will include a transient
marina, fishing- pier, cafe/restaurant and retail
space. The park is needed to serve the high density
employee population in the area.
Project Cost: $125,000
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000
$22,567
- 47
2000-2005
TOTAL
$22, 567
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: S.E. 12th Street Park
Project Area: Downtown
Project Justification: This project calls for the development of a new
waterfront urban park in the area of 9rickell through
the use of the public right-of-way. The S.E. 12th
Street park will become the gateway to the Brickell
waterfront and the catalyst for future retail
development in this area. It will include a transient
marina, fishing pier, cafe/restaurant and retail
space. The park is needed to serve the high density
employee population in the area.
Project Cost: $125,000
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$22, 567 $22, 567
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: S.E. 12th Street Park
Project Area: Downtown
Project Justification: This project calls for the development of a new
waterfront urban park in the area of Brickell through
the use of the public right-of-way. The S.E. 12th
Street park will become the gateway to the Brickell
waterfront and the catalyst for 'future' retail
development in this area. It will include a transient
marina, fishing pier, cafe/restaurant and retail
space. The park is needed to serve the high density
employee population in the area.
Project Cost: $125, 000 -
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2 000 2000-2005
$22, 567
TOTAL
$22, 567
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Brickell Avenue
Project Area: Downtown
Project Justification: Brickell Avenue is the center of Miami's major corpo-
rations, and financing institutions. A redesign of
Brickell Avenue is needed to make this avenue one of
the great avenues of Miami. The project calls for
improvements to the public right-of-way, including the
center median with landscaping, gateway features at
the Brickell Avenue Bridge and SW 15th Road, decora-
tive paving, decorative lighting and street furniture.
These improvements are needed to create an attractive
pedestrian linkage and insure the positive development
and growth of the Brickell area.
Project Cost: $1, 000, 000
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 -2000-2005 TOTAL.
$180, 536 $180, 536
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: N.E. 4th Street
Project Area: Downtown
Project Justification: This project calls for right-of-way improvements on
N.E. 4th Street between Second Avenue and Biscayne
Boulevard. These improvements are needed to complete
the east -west linkage from the cortmuniLf college to
the Bayfront.
Project Cost: $275,000
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$16,549, $16,549
49
10426
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: N.E. 14th Street
Project Area: Downtown
Project Justification: The project calls for the design of N.E. 14th Street
at the Omni area which will create an east -west
connection to the bayfront. The plan includes
improvements and design of the public• right-of-way
with decorative paving, decorative lighting, street
- furniture and landscaping throughout. The project
will provide the link needed to the existing
neighborhood and _encourage future development in the
area.
Project Cost: S910, 000
Parks and Recreation
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Riverbanks Park
Project Area: Downtown
Project Justification: This project involves acquisition and development of
Riverfront property. The plan calls for the design of
a cafe/restaurant, a transient marina, plazas and
seating areas. 'These improvements wilt include
decorative paving, decorative lighting, street furni-
ture and landscaping. The design of Riverbank Plaza
will attract commercial development in the neighbor-
hood, revitalize -the ri verfront as well as become the
principal node of this riverfront neighborhood.
Project Cost: $480, 000
1988-1990 1990-199*5 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$86, 657 $86,657
.�.
STREETS
if l
1
Streets
Impact Fee
Capital Projects
Cost
Schedule
Summary
Planning District
2-Year Period 5-Year Periods
17-Year Period
1988-90
1990-95
95-2000
2000-05
1988-2005
A.
Edison/Model City
$67,586
$185,587
$174,386
$181,054
$60B,613
B.
Downtown
1,980,328
2,122,732
2,167,184
2,327,506
8,597,750
C.
Coconut Grove
178,448
627,234
463,461
593,145
1,8621288
0.
Little Havana
118,234
341,362
_268,548
231,849
959,993
E.
Flagami
66,855
202,710
151,724
182,306
603;595
F.
Al l apattah
135,563
349,856
289,042
279,101
1, 053, 562
G.
Virginia Key
0
0
0
0
0'
All Districts
$2,547,014
$3,829,481
$3,514,345
$31794,961
$13,685,801
a
Streets
Impact Fee Projects
Project 0escription Sheet
Project Name: Edison Street Rebuilding Improvements
Project Area: Edison
Project Justification: The Edison street rebuilding improvements that will be
constructed with impact fees between 1968 and 2005 are
estimated to cost S6O8,613. The average life
expectancy of the street rebti 1 rli improvements, with
adequate maintenance including, periodic pavement
resurfacing, is approximately 60 years. These
improvements will be constructed in accordance with
City of Miami engineering specifications and
standards. Impact fees will fund the rebuilding of
streets within the Edison Planning District that will
serve traffic generated by new development. The
impact fees will provide funding for street rebuilding
that would not otherwise occur between 1988 and 2005.
Project Cost:
1988-199 0 1990-1995
$67, 586 $185, 587
1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$174,386 $181, 054 $608,613
0
Streets
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Edison Street Rebuilding Improvements
Project Area: Edison
Project Justification: The Edison street rebuilding improvements that will be
constructed with impact fees between 1988 and 2005 are
estimated to cost $608,613. The average life
expectancy of the ctroot rabuilding i.mpro ements, with
adequate maintenance including periodic pavement
resurfacing, is approximately 60 years. These
_ improvements will be constructed in accordance with
City of Miami engineering specifications and
standards. Impact fees will fund the rebuilding of
streets within the Edison Planning District that will
serve traffic generated by new development. The
impact fees will provide funding for street rebuilding
that would not otherwise occur between 1988 and 2005.
Project Cost:
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$679586 $185, 587 $174,386 $181, 054 S608,613
n
r]
F1
Streets
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Downtown Street Rebuilding Improvements
Project Area: Downtown
Project Justification: The Downtown- street rebuilding improvements that will
be constructed with impact fees between 1988 and 2005
are estimated to cost $8,597,750. The average fife
expectancy of the street rebuilding improvements, with
adequate maintenance including periodic pavement
resurfacing, is approximately 60 years. These
improvements will be constructed in accordance with
City of Miami engineering specifications and
standards. Impact fees will fund the rebuilding of
streets within the Downtown Planning District that
will serve traffic generated by new development. The
impact fees will provide funding for street rebuilding
that would not otherwise occur between 1988 and 2005.
Project Cost: `
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$1,980,328 $2,122,732 $2,167,184 $2,3279506 $8,5979750
Streets
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Coconut Grove Street Rebuilding Improvements
Project Area: Coconut Grove
Project Justification: The Coconut Grove street rebuilding improvements that
will be constructed with impact fees between 1988 and
2005 are estimated to cost $1,862,288. The average
life expectancy of the street rebuilding improvements',
with adequate maintenance including periodic pavement
resurfacing, is approximately 60 years. These
improvements will be constructed in accordance with
City of Miami engineering specifications and
standards. Impact fees will fund the rebuilding of
streets within the ,Coconut Grove Planning District
that will serve .traffic generated by new development.
The impact fees will provide funding for street
rebuilding that would not otherwise occur between 1988
and 2005.
Project Cost:
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$178,448 $627,234 $463,461 S593,145 $1,862,288
Streets
Impact Pee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Little Havana Street Rebuilding Improvements
Project Area: Little Havana
Project Justification: The Little Havana street rebuilding improvements that
will be constructed with impact fees between 1988 and
2005 are estimated to cost $959,993 The average life
expectancy of the street rebuilding improvements, with
adequate maintenance including periodic pavement
resurfacing, is approximately 60 years. These
improvements will be constructed in accordance with
City of Miami engineering specifications and
standards. Impact fees will fund the rebuilding of
streets within the .Little Havana Planning District
that will serve traffic generated by new development.
The impact fees will provide funding for, street
rebuilding that would not otherwise occur between 1988
and 2005. _
Project Cost:
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
I
Streets
Impact Pee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Little Havana Street Rebuilding Improvements
Project Area: Little Havana
Project Justification: The Little Havana street rebuilding improvements that
will be constructed with impact fees between 1988 and
2005 are estimated to cost $959, 993 The average 1 i.fe
expectancy of the street rebuilding improvements, with
adequate maintenance including periodic pavement
resurfacing, is approximately 60 years. These
improvements will be constructed in accordance with
City of Miami engineering specifications and
standards. Impact fees -will fund the rebuilding of
streets within the Little Havana Planning District
that will serve traffic generated by new development.
The impact fees will provide funding for street
rebuilding that would not otherwise occur between 1988
and 2005.
Project Cost:
1988-199 0 199 0-199 5
$118,234 $341,362
199 5-2000 2000-2005
$268,548 $231,849
It 56 ,
TOTAL
$959, 993
IL0424* 1 ,
woo
"A1 AL
Streets
Impact Fee projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Flagami Street Rebuilding Improvements
Project Area: Flagami
Project Justification: The Flagami street rebuilding improvements that will
be constructed with impact fees between 1988 and 2005
are estimated to cost S603, 595. The average life
expectancy of the street rebuilding improvements, with
adequate maintenance including periodic pavement
resurfacing, is approximately 60 years. These
improvements will be constructed in accordance with
City of Miami engineering specifications and
standards. Impact fees will fund the rebuilding of
streets within the Flagami Planning District that will
serve traffic generated by new development. The
impact fees will provide funding for street rebuilding
that would not otherwise occur between 1988 and 2005.
Project Cost:
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000
$66,855 $202,710 $151,724
r 57 W
2000-2005 TOTAL
$182,306 $603, 595
1.00r6
b
Alk
Streets
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Allapattah Street Rebuilding Improvements
Project Area: Allapattah
Project Justification: The Allapattah street rebuilding improvements that
will be constructed with impact fees between 1988 and
2005 are estimated to cost $1,053,562. The average
life expectancy of the street rebuilding improvements,
with adequate maintenance including periodic pavement
resurfacing, is approximately 60 years. These
improvements will be constructed in accordance with
City of Miami engineering specifications and
standards. Impact fees will fund the rebuilding of
streets within the Allapattah Planning District that
will serve traffic generated by new development. The
impact fees will provide funding for street rebuilding
that would not otherwise occur between 1988 and 2005.
Project Cost:
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$1359563 $349,856 S289, 042 $279,101 $1, 053, 562
d
Storm Sewers
Impact Fee Capital Projects
Cost Schedule
Summary
Planning District
2-Year Period
5-Year Periods
17-Year Period
1988-90
1990-95
95-2000
2000-05
1988-2005
-A.
Edison/Model City
S33,792
$92,793
$87,192
$90,526
$304,303
B.
Downtown
990,163
1,061,365
1,083,591
1,163,752
4,298,871
C.
Coconut Grove
89,223
313,616
231,730
296,572
931,141
D.
Little Havana
59,116
170,680
134,273
115,924
479,993
E.
Flagami
33,427
101,354
75,861
91,152
301,794
F.
Allapattah
67,781
174,927
144,520
139,550
526,778
G.
Virginia Key
0
0
0
0
0
All Districts
$1,273, 502
$1,914,735
$1,757,167
$1,897,476
$6,842,880
Storm Sewers
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Edison Storm Sewer Improvements
Project Area: Edison
Project Justification: The Edison storm sewer improvements that will be
constructed with impact fees between 1988 and 2005 are
estimated to cost S304,303. The average life
expectancy of the storm sewer improvements, with
adequate maintenance, is approximately 60 years.
These improvements will be constructed in accordance
with City of Miami engineering specifications and
standards. Impact fees will fund the construction of
•storm sewers in the streets within the Edison Planning
District that will serve new development. The impact
fees will provide funding for storm sewers' that would
not otherwise occur between 1988 and 2005.
Project Cost:
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$33,792 $922793 $87,192 $90,526 $3 04,303
Storm Sewers
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Downtown Storm Sewer Improvements
Project Area: Downtown
Project Justification: The Downtown storm sewer improvements that will be
constructed with impact fees between 1988 and 2605 are
estimated to cost S4,298,871. The average life
expectancy of the st;.r n. sewer -Improvements, with
adequate maintenance, is approximately 60 years.
These improvements will be constructed in accordance
with City of Miami engineering specifications and
standards. Impact fees will fund the construction of
storm sewers in the streets within the Downtown
Planning District that will serve new development.
The impact fees will provide funding for storm sewers
that would not otherwise occur between 1988 and 2005.
Project Cost:
1988-199 0
$990,163
1990-1995
1995-2000
2000-2005
TOTAL
$1, 061,365
$1, 083, 591
$1,163, 752
$4,298,871
Storm Sewers
Impact Fee Projects
Project description Sheet
Project Name: Coconut Grove Storm Sewer Improvements
Project Area: Coconut Grove
Project Justification: The Coconut Grove storm sewer improvements that will
be constructed with impact fees between 1988 and 2005
are estimated to cost $931,141. The. average life
expectancy of the storm Sewer irjir o- en- ei- 6s, wi th
adequate maintenance, is approximately 60 years.
These improvements will be constructed in accordance
with City of. Miami engineering specifications and
standards. Impact fees will fund the construction of
storm sewers in the 'streets within the Coconut Grove
Planning District that will serve new development.
The impact fees will provide funding for storm sewers
that would not otherwise occur between 1988 and 2005.
Project Cost:
1988-1990 199 0-199 5
$89,223 $313,616
199 5-2 000
$231,730
2000-2005
$296, 572
TOTAL
$931,141
Storm Sewers
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project !Jame: Little
Havana Storm Sewer Improvements
Project Area: Little
Havana
Project Justification:
The Little Havana storm sewer improvements that will
be constructed with impact fees between 1988 and 2005
are estimated to cost $479,993. The average life
expectancy of the sLurm sewer improvements, with
adequate maintenance, is approximately 60 years.
These improvements will be constructed in accordance
with City of Miami engineering specifications and
standards. Impact fees will fund the construction of
storm sewers in the streets within the. Little Havana
Planning District that will serve new development.
The impact fees will provide funding for storm sewers
that would not otherwise occur between 1988 and 2005.
Project Cost:
-
1988-1990
1990-1995 199 5-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$59,116
$170,680 $134,273 $115,924 $479,993
Storm Sewers
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Flagami Storm Sewer Improvements
Project Area: Flagami
Project Justification: The Flagami storm sewer improvements that will be
constructed with impact fees between 1988 and 2005 are
estimated to cost $301.794. The Average life
expectancy of the storm sewer improvements, with
adequate maintenance, is approximately 60 years.
- These improvements will be constructed in accordance
with City 'of Miami engineering specifications and
standards. Impact fees will fund the construction of
storm sewers in the streets within the Flagami
Planning District that will serve new development.
The impact fees will provide funding for storm sewers
that would not otherwise occur between 1988 and 2005.
Project Cost:
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$33,427 $101,354 S75,861 S91,152 5301,794
Storm Sewers
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Allapattah Storm Sewer Improvements
Project Area: Allapattah
Project Justification: The Allapattah storm sewer improvements that will be
constructed with impact fees between 1988 and 2005 are
estimated to cost S526,778. ' The average , life
expectancy of the storm sewer improvements, with
adequate maintenance, is approximately 60 years.
These improvements will be constructed in accordance
with City of Miami engineering specifications and
standards. Impact fees will fund the construction of
storm sewers in the streets within the Allapattah
Planning District that will serve new development.
The impact fees will provide funding for storm sewers
that would not otherwise occur between 1988 and 2006.
Project Cost:
1988-1990
$67,781
199 0-1995
$174,927
1995-2000
$144,520
2000-2005
$139,550
TOTAL
$526,778
Planning District
A. Edison/Model City
B. Downtown
C. Coconut Grove
D. Little Havana
E. Flagami
F. Allapattah
G. Virginia Key
All Districts
Solid Waste
Impact Fee Capital Projects
Cost Schedule
Summary
2-Year Period 5-Year Periods 17-Year Period
1988-90 1990-95 95-2000 2000-05 1988-2005
$25,771
$63,306
$57,310
S54,607
$200,994
556,624
538,947
495,808
537,759
$2,129,138
36,866
87, 02 5 -
_ 70,164
83,035
277,090
63,762
1659951
131,685
107,886
469,284
12,343
32,778
24,544
27,670
97,335
47,843
113,688
94,854
81,470
337,855
7,165
29,854
0
0
37,019
$750,374
$1,031,549
$874,365
$892,427
$3,548,715
. 6{ .
Solid Waste
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Purchase of Additional Garbage Trucks
Project Area(s): Citywide
Project Justification: Miami Solid Waste Departmient standards suggest that
the carrying capacity of a typical garbage truck is
approximately 12 tons per load and 2 loads per day.
Project Cost: $100,000 per garbage truck
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$223,342 $319,627 $279,256 $291,841 $1,114,066
Solid Waste
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Purchase of Additional Trash Trucks
Project Area(s): Citywide
Project Justification: Miami Solid Waste Department standards suggest that
the carrying capacity of a typical trash truck is
approximately 7 tons per load and 3 loads per day.
Solid Waste
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Purchase of Additional Self -Contained Roll On/Roll Offs
Project Area(s): Citywide
Project Justification: Miami Solid Waste Department standards suggest that
the carrying capacity of a typical roil on/roll off is
1 roll on/roll off per 2 trash or garbage trucks (for
non-residential pickups only).
Project Cost: $10,000 per roll on/roll off
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005
$15,998 $19,639 $15,090 $14,128
69
L1
Solid Waste
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Purchase of Additional Tractors with Hoists
Project Area(s): Citywide
Project Justification: Miami Solid Waste Department standards suggest that
the carrying capacity of a typical tractor with hoist
is 1 tractor per 2 trash or garbage trucks ( for non-
residential pickups only).
Project Cost: S120,000 per tractor and hoist
1988-1990
$191,978
1990-1995
$235, 678
1995-2000
$181,085
2000-2005
$169, 543
TOTAL
$778,284
Solid Waste
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Purchase of Additional Cranes
Project Area(s): Citywide
Project Justification: Miami Solid Waste Department standards suggest that 1
crane is required for every 2 trash trucks.
Project Cost: $130,000 per crane
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$165,911 $237,436 S2079'447 $216;797 $827,591
Planning District
A. Edison/Model City
B. Downtown
C. Coconut Grove
D. Little Havana
E. Flagami
F. Allapattah
G. Virginia Key
All Districts
General Services Administration
Impact Fee Capital Projects
Cost Schedule
Summary
2-Year Period
5-Year
Periods
17-Year Period
1988-90
i99C-95
9 -2000
2000-U5
1988-2 005.
$21,343
$48,652
S42,815
$37,922
$150,732
402,639
366,881
313,527
342,634
1,425,681
28,285
49,732
43,591
47,891
169,499
529786
128, 2 02
102,366
80, 634
363, 988
9456
22,467
16,829
17,793
66,545
40,641
91,834
77,109
60,952
270,536
6,142.
25,595
0
0
31,737
$561,292
$733,363
$596,237
$587,826
$2,478 718
w
72 w
:
10426
26
lob
General Services Administration
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Construction of Heavy Equipment Parking
Project Area(s): Citywide
Project Justification: General Service Administration standards suggest 420
square feet of parking area for each piece of heavy
equipment, at a cost of approximately S62.50 per
square foot of parking area.
Project Cost: $62.50 per square foot of parking area
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005
$243,118 $330,841 $278,192 $282,11 0
3
General Services Administration
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Construction of Light Equipment Parking
Project Area(s): Citywide
Project Justification: General Service Administration standards suggest 160
square feet of parking area for each police vehicle at
a cost of approximately $62.50 per square foot of
parking area.
Project Cost: $62.50 per square foot of parking area
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 20004 005 TOTAL
$259,429 $325;237 $254,840 $243, 088 $1, 082, 594
74 R
102
i
General Services Administration
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Construction of Employee Parking
Project Area(s): Citywide
Project Justification: 'General Service Administration standards suggest 160
square feet of parking area for every two equipment
mechanics at a cost of approximately $62.50 per square
foot of parking area.
Project Cost: $62.50 per square foot of parking area
1988-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 TOTAL
$49301 $5,557 $49475 $4,375 $18,70a
75
10 2b
For
General Services Administration
Impact Fee Projects
Project Description Sheet
Project Name: Construction of Heavy Equipment Work Bay
Project Area(s): Citywide
Project Justification: General Service Administration standards suggest 750
square feet of working bay space for each additional
heavy equipment mechanic at a cost of approximately
$140 per square foot of working bay area.
Project,Cost: $140 per square foot of working bay area
1988-1990
$32,412
1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005
$44,109 $37,090 $37,611
TOTAL
$151,222
14,
MIAMI REVIEW
Pkjhhshrri D,40N, e: cepl 5atklfd y, SuIIJ,1y and
t.e;7nr fiohdays
Mlamr, Dade County. Florida.
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF DADE:
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared
Octelma V. Ferbeyre, who on oath says that she is the
Supervisor of Legal Advertising of the Miami Review, a daily
(except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) newspaper,
published at Miami in Dade County, Florida; that the attached
copy of advertisement, being a Legal Advertisement of Notice
In the matter of
CITY OF MIAMI
ORDINANCE NO. 10426
in the . , . X .. X . , X..... ...... . .. Court,
was published in said newspaper In the Issues of
May 6, 1988
Affiant further says that the said Miami Review Is a
newspaper published at Miami in said Dade County, Florida,
and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously
published in said Dade County, Florida, each day (except
Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) and has been entered as
second class mail matter at the post office in Miami in said
Dade County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding
the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and
affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any
person, firm or corporatio iscount, rebate, commission
or refund for the p:I,/dp,
f se ring this advertisement for
pu r lion in theX1111 saspape
%/
i
Swor% �&d subscribed before me this
• A.D. 19
6h..; 88
t ' : Cheryl H. Marmer
NgfSr .POfic, State of Florida at Large
4 ISE�1"•.""CC',,"•
My CofSrryr) Ali wr 4tii 12, 1992.
MR 114
CITY Of! MIAMI
bAbIl COUNtV, t:L6011bA
LEGAL NOTICE
All interested persons will take notice that on the 28th day of April.
1988, the City Commission of Miami, Florida, adopted the following titled
ordinances'
ORDINANCE NO. 10426
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO 10273 AND SUB-
STITUTING THEREFORE A NEW CHAPTER 54.6 IMPOSING AN
"IMPACT FEE" ON ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT AS HEREIN
DETERMINED IN ORDER TO FINANCE RELATED CAPITAL
iMPROVSMENTS, THE DEMAND FOR WHICH IS CREATED BY
SUCH DEVELOPMENT, SETTING FORTH FINDINGS AND INTENT:
PROVIDING THE AUTHORITY THEREFORE; PROVIDING DEFI-
NITIONS; PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY OF THE IMPACT FEE;
PROVIDING FOR EXEMPTIONS: PROVIDING FOR IMPOSITION
OF THE IMPACT FEE; PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT
OF DEVELOPMENT SUBAREAS; PROVIDING FOR DETERMINA-
,ION OF DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES; PROVIDING FOR
E5rABLI$HMENT OF AN IMPACT FEE•RELATEO CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, PROVIDING FOR ESTABLISHMENT
OF IMPACT FEE COEFFICIENTS; PROVIDING FOR CALCULA-
TION OF IMPACT FEES; PROVIDING FOR ADMINISTRATION OF
IMPACT FEES; PROVIDING FOR BONDING IMPACT FEE -
RELATED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECTS: AND
PROVIDING FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF AN APPELLATE BOAR')
AND APPELLATE PROCEDURES; CONTAINING A REPEALER
PROVISION AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE,
ORDINANCE NO. 10421
AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE EXTENDING A MORATORIUM
ON THE COLLECTION OF IMPACT FEES AS ORIGINALL,
IMPOSED PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO, 10273, ADOPTED
MAY 28, 1987, TO LAST UNTIL MAY 28. 1988.
ORDINANCE NO. 10428
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF
ORDINANCE NO.9500, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, BY REMOVING THE "PEDESTRIAN STREET
DESIGNATION" FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHTOFWAY IN THE SPI
14 ZONING DISTRICT FOR THOSE PORTIONS OF SOUTHWEST
12TH AND SOUTHWEST 17TH AVENUES BETWEEN SOUTHWEST
8TH AND SOUTHWEST 9TH STREETS, RETAINING SAID DES-
IGNATION FOR THAT PORTION OF RIGHTOFWAY ON
PROPERTIES FOR HEREIN AFFECTED AREAS FACING SOUTH-
WEST 8TH STREET; BY RETAINING THE SPI.14 ZONING DES.
IGNATION; AND BY MAKING ALL THE NECESSARY CHANGES
ON PAGE NOS. 38 AND 39 OF SAID ZONING ATLAS.)
ORDINANCE NO.10429
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 62, ENTITLED
"ZONING AND PLANNING," OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF
MIAMI, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING ARTICLE Vill ENTITLED "LATIN
QUARTER REVIEW BOARD," SECTIONS 62.76 THROUGH 62.82,
BY CLARIFYING DEFINITION OF CLASS "C" PERMIT;
MODIFYING THE BOARD'S PURPOSE;; MODIFYING BOARD
ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS; CLARIFYING BOARD FUNC-
TIONS, POWERS AND DUTIES; MODIFYING BOARD
PROCEDURES; CLARIFYING DUTIES OF LATIN QUARTER
OFFICER; AND MODIFYING APPEAL PROCEDURES.
ORDINANCE NO.10430
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI,
FLORIDA, BY AMENDING CHAPTER 2, DIVISION 8, SECTION
2.135, PARAGRAPH 8, TO INCORPORATE THE "LATIN QUARTER
DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS" BY
REFERENCE; BY RATIFYING URBANPLAZAS AND THE LATIN
QUARTER DISTRICT AS AREAS SUBJECT TO REVIEW UNDER
SAID GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS; AND UPDATING DEPART-
MENTAL NAMES:
ORDINANCE NO.10431
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 9500, THE
ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA. BY
AMENDING ARTICLE 15, SECTION 15140, ENTITLED "SPI.14,
14.1, 14.2; LATIN QUARTER COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL AND
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS AND RELATED SECTIONS
15141/15145 BY EXPANDING THE NUMBER OF USES ALLOWED
IN COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL AND RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS;
MODIFYING THE SUBMISSION AND REVIEW PROCESS; CLARI-
FYING "PEDESTRIAN STREETS' ALLOWING BARS, SALOONS,
AND TAVERNS AS ACCESSORY USES; EXPANDING OUTDOOR
USES; INCREASING THE NUMBER OF INCENTIVES FOR
DEVELOPMENT; AND AMENDING THE LANGUAGE FOR
PEDESTRIAN OPEN SPACE AND SIGN REQUIREMENTS.
ORDINANCE NO.10432
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE, CHAPTER 62,
ZONING AND PLANNING, ARTICLE 11, COMPREHENSIVE
PLANNING; SECTIONS 62.15 THROUGH 62.23 AND SECTIONS
62.55 PERTAINING TO: PURPOSE AND INTENT, ESTABLISHMENT
OF ADVISORY AND POLICY BOARDS GENERALLY, AOMINIS.
TRATION GENERALLY, EFFECT OF PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED
COMPREHENSIVE PLANS, PREPARATION OF THE COMPRE-
HENSIVE PLAN, TYPES OF PLAN AMENDMENTS, APPLICA-
TIONS FOR PLAN AMENDMENT, r PROCEDURES FOR, REVIEW
AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND
PLAN AMENDMENTS BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND
PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD, PROCEDURES FOR REVIEW AND
ADOPTION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE ,PLAN AND'PL.AN
PREHENSIVE PLAN AND ADOPTION OF AN EVALUATION AND
APPRAISAL REPORT, PROVIDING FOR LEGAL STATUS AND
APPLICABILITY OF THE PLAN AFTER ADOPTION AND
PROVIDING FOR APPROPRIATIONS, FEE$ AND OTHER
EXPENSES; PROVIDING FOR ADDITIONAL LEGAL NOTICE AND
OTHER PRO0EDUR4 REQUIREMENT$;
Bald ordlnenoee moy t* InopooteA ay the puhllc fit the iolflo of the
Olty Clans, Pan Amp"can Drlyo, Mlomi, F1940o, MonSoy 4hrouph
F11OaY, efsoiupinp hpllQeyf, between the houre of $�9 A.M. r1inQ 6 G A,M.
MATTY HIRAI
t414MI Lcw41
ftl$1 CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA
><134M
•
General Services Administration
Impact Fee Projects
Project Oescription Sheet
Project Name: Construction of Light Equipment Work Bay