HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-88-0496J-8S=Bi4
6/S/88
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE HID OF PITNEY
EOWES, INC. FOR FURNISHING ONE (1) ELECTRONIC
MAIL PROCESSING SYSTEM FOR USE AT THE CITY'S
MAILROOM FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL
SERVICES ADMINISTRATION AT A TOTAL PROPOSED
COST OF $12,629.00; ALLOCATING FUNDS THEREFOR
FROM THE 1987-88 OPERATING BUDGET ACCOUNT
CODE 140. 420501-850; AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO INSTRUCT THE CHIEF PROCUREMENT
OFFICER TO ISSUE A PURCHASE ORDER FOR THIS
EQUIPMENT; FURTHER APPROVING THE CHIEF
PROCUREMENT OFFICER'S DECISION TO REJECT A
PROTEST RECEIVED IN CONNECTION WITH SAID
PROJECT.
WHEREAS, pursuant to public notice, sealed bids were
received April 27, 1988 for the furnishing of one (1) Electronic
Mail Processing System to the Department of General Services
Administration; and
WHEREAS, invitations were mailed to twelve (12) potential
suppliers and two (2) bids were received; and
WHEREAS, funds for this purchase will be available from the
1987-88 Operating Budget Account No. 420501-850; and
WHEREAS, this equipment will be used by the Department of
General Services Administration for the purpose of substantially
improving the speed of mail handling by the use of automated
process at the City's mailroom and it will also provide greatly
improved accountability and expenditure records by piece of mail
processed; and
WHEREAS, the Chief Procurement Officer has reviewed the
protest filed by International Mailing Systems and rejected said
protest after finding its bid to be nonresponsive due to the fact
that the submitted bid did not meet the City's specifications;
and
WHEREAS, the City Manager and City Attorney have approved
said rejection; and
CITY COMMISSION
MEETING OF
JUN 9 1988 QQ
ESOLUTION No.
EMARKS: __
WHEREAS. the City Manager and the Director of the General.
Services Administration Department recommend that the bid
received from Pitney Bowes, Inc. be accepted as the lowest
responsible and responsive bid;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the
preamble to this Resolution are hereby approved, confirmed and
adopted by reference thereto and incorporated herein as is fully
set forth in this section.
Section 2. Upon recommendation of the City Manager and
the City Attorney, the Chief Procurement Officer's decision to
reject the protest filed by International Mailing Systems is
hereby approved.
Section 3. The April 27, 1988 bid of Pitney Bowes,
Inc. for furnishing one (1) Electronic Mail Processing System to
the General Services Administration Department at a total
proposed cost of $12,629.00 is hereby accepted with funds
therefor hereby allocated from the 1987-88 Operating Budget
Account No. 420501-850.
Section 2. The City Manager is hereby authorized to
instruct the Chief Procurement Officer to issue a purchase order
for this equipment.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of June 1988.
XAVIER L. SbAEZ, MAYOR
ATTEST*,
MATTY HIRAI
CITY CLERK
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
7-
ROBERT F. CLERK
CHIEF DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY
RFC:bss:M728
-2-
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
CORRECTNESS:^.
JORGE 1. F�RNANDEZ
CITY ATTORNEY
PR-496
BID SECURITY
,T fyElectronic Mail Processing System DATE RID$ RtcEIYED April 27 , 1988 2: 30pm
81-96-07-5
TYPE OF SECURITY
BIDDER f
TOTAL
AMOUNT
I
International Mailing Sys ems
Dave Ilobrook Distributors, In
Broken down by items
Friden Alcatel
"
Pitney Bowes
NO BID•
Delta Business Systems
Malvern Scale Data Systems, I
Smith Scale Inc.
c.
Automated Business Machines
tECEIVED on behalf of PURCHASING DIV./PUBL C WORKS envelopes.
DATE:--��,
skcvr Rlcjv16941 checks •ill• Icy *l
volt AccOUNTINC DiVIi$ON
t
A
LEGAL ADvERTtSEMENT
81D__Noz __87=88-075
Sealed bids will be received by the City of Miami City Clerk at
her office located at 3500kax�„ e_r�,ican Drive# Miami, Plorida,
33133 not later than p.m. April7#11988 for the furnishing
of One (1) Electronit'""Pr'ocessing System for the Department
of General Services Administration/Graphic Reproductions
Division.
Bids submitted past such deadline and/or submitted to any other
location or office shall be deemed not responsive and will be
rejected.
Ordinance No. 10062 established a goal of Awarding 51% of the
City's total dollar volume of all expenditures for All Goods and
services to Black, Hispanic and Women Minority Business
Enterprises on an equal basis.
Minority and women vendors who are interested in submitting bids
and who are not registered with the City as minority or women
vendors are advised to contact the City Procurement Office, 1390
N.W. 20th Street, Second Floor, Telephone 579-6380.
Detailed specifications for the bids are available upon request
at the City Procurement Office.
The City Manager may reject all bids and readvertise.
(Ad No. 5127
Cesar H. Odio
City Manager
Oh :G R B- udV eeJl
cnj)
REQUISITION FOR ADVERTISEMENT This number must appear
' in the advertisement.
DEPTbIV.
ACCOUNT CODE ' t
DATE _ `__- — PHONE APPROVED BY:
PREPARED BY
DIRECTOR OF ISSUING DEPARTMENT
Publish the attached advertisement times.
(number of times)
Type of advertisement: legal classified display
(Check One)
Size: Starting date _
First four words of advertisement:
Remarks:
DO NOT TYPE BELOW THIS LINE. FOR USE OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT ONLY.
LINE
PUBLICATION
DATE(S) OF
ADVERTISEMENT
INVOICE
AMOUNT
0
A-1
B-2
C-3
D-4
E-5
F3
F4
F5
F7
F8
F9
F10
F11
F12
LINE
TRANS
VOUCHER
DUE DATE
YY MM DIDAdv.
Doc. Reference
VENDOR
INDEX CODE
OBJECT
PROJECT
11
13
1 117
18 1 125,34
39142
45
50,51
56
57 62
63 65
66 71
0
1
2
411
V
I P
2
10121
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
817
1
2
314
7
8 V P 12
13
14
15 DESCRIPTION
36
64DISCOUNT 69
72
AMOUNT 80
5
2
0
0
2
0
1
_s
White — Purchasing Yellow - Finance
Approved for Payment
Pink — Department
'98-49G.
CITY Of- MIAM;, F-Lo-VuA
INTER -OFFICE MI Ni<:iFtr,t�:7t}tr1
t.
TO
Matty Hirai -June lOt 1588 FILE
City Clerk
Bid Protest
Bid #87=88-05
FROM f
R n �E. Williams, Director
General Services Administration
Attached is a copy for your records of the letter
resolving the protest to bid #87-88-075, mail
processing system.
(4ULT Jorf �miamt'
I opy
RON L WILt1A'MS
biredor
C,9OfCO FLOQ�oa:
June 8, 1988
International Mailing Systems
David L. Cohen, Sales Representative
3636 N. Andrews Avenue
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33309
Dear Mr. Cohen:
Re: Bid No. 87-88-075, Electronic Mail Processing System
USAk H. 01310
City ManagOt
I, as Chief Procurement Officer of the City of Miami, have read
your bid protest letter of June 1, 1988, talked with Graphic
Reproductions Division employees involved in the issue, and
reviewed the pertinent documents. Pursuant to my duties under
Section 18-56.2, City of Miami Code, I have determined that your
bid protest is without merit for the reasons set forth below.
The City Manager and City Attorney have approved my determination
and will submit it to the City Commission, whose decision shall
be final.
The reason that your protest lacks merit is because your bid as
submitted does not meet the following required specifications:
1. Floating letter deck - This provides for automatic adjustment
of the system when processing mailing envelopes of varying
thicknesses. Also, a floating letter deck provides for movements
away from the postage meter, selection switch and other
electronic functions that may at any time cause a malfunction in
reading. The floating upper feed mechanism of your machine will
not provide the necessary thickness adjustments, as your
specifications state a maximum of 3/81' letter thickness. City
mail is often 1/211 or thicker which the floating letter deck will
process without operator adjustment. Your equipment therefore,
does not meet specifications.
2. Instant wet mailing tape from roll - This provides for speed
and accuracy when processing large packages. A roll of tape
costs much less than an equal amount of adhesive strip, and first
class strips are longer than 2nd class or regular postage strips.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT/1390 N.W. 20 Street/Miami, F1 33142/130S1 S79-6740
'98-49F-.
0
Mr. David L. Cohen Page 2 June 8, 1988
Therefore, two sizes of your tape are necessary and they must be
arranged each time classes are changed. The roll provides
postage tape for 840 pieces of mail that are less than first
class and 504 pieces of first class mail instantly. We consider
the method used by your equipment for tape dispensing to be time
consuming and it does not meet specifications.
3. Heavy duty construction and heavy duty chain drive - This
accommodates the extremely heavy work load within the mail room
of Graphic Reproductions. Approximately four to six thousand
(4,000 to 6,000) pieces of different types and weights of mail
are processed daily. Your equipment does not appear to be of a
heavy duty construction and does not have a heavy duty chain
drive, therefore, it does not meet specifications.
The passing of four to six thousand pieces of mail of various
sizes and thicknesses through any mailing machine will bring
about wear and tear. The City does not recover costs for the
purchase of mail room equipment. Therefore, any equipment
purchased must function for at least ten (10) years.
4. Postage by phone - This provides for postage meter
replenishments without the loss of one and one half (1 1/2) to
two (2) hours of mail processing time. Your equipment does not
offer this feature and, therefore does not meet specifications.
Of the four references given by your organization, the City of
North Miami Beach and the City of Hialeah had a total mailing
volume of less than 2,000 per week. Another reference, Southeast
Bank, Credit Card Division was a large volume mailing service
which processes the same size and thickness envelope from an
inserting machine. This does not compare with various types,
sizes and thicknesses of envelopes and flats that the City of
Miami Mail Room processes daily on our present equipment.
At Southern Bell we were told that they were not pleased with
their Hassler Mailing Machine and with the service, which at
times took longer than 24 hours for response. We were informed
they had recently purchased a new Friden mailing• machine. When
questioned as to why a Freiden over another Hassler, the
response was that the Friden was a more heavy duty piece of
equipment, providing flexibility for processing various sizes and
thicknesses.
City Code Sec. 18-52.1. entitled Competitive Sealed Bidding,
states in part "the award will be made to the lowest responsible
and responsive bidder principally on the basis of price".
88-496-.
Q
i\
Mr. baVid L. Cohen
Page 3
June 8, 1988
The Electronic Mail Processing System bid of International
Mailing Systems as noted above; does not meet specifications and
therefore is not considered responsive.
For the foregoing reasons,
er truly yours,
�r� /iAlliamsRo E.r
Chief Procurement Officer
Approv :
Cesar H. Odio
City Manager
I am rejecting your bid protest.
Approved as to form and Correctness:
Jor a L. Fe r andez
City Attorn y
111
rn�ernatibnal lViaiiin� �y�%1��
flonal Meiling Systems
olbrook Distributors Inc.
.tune 1, 1988
City of Miami
1390 NW 20th Street
Miami, FL 33142
Attn: Chief Procurment Officier, General service Administrator
RE: Bid #87-88-075
Dear Sir;
I am writing you in order to protest this bid. Our price is $3185.50 less
than the equipment you intend to purchase plus our service contract annually is
lower cost by over$500.00 per year. I would like to address thu reasons given
us that you did not go with our equipment in order:
1. Floating letter Deck - Our system has a floating upper feed mechanism which
is the same idea except it is on top instead of on the bottom.
2. Instant Wet Mailing Tape From Roll - Our modern mailing equipment is equiped
with -the most innovative and up to date methods for dispensing tape. We
use pre-cut pressure sensitive labels which:
A. Stick to anything which wet tape does not
B. Does not require threading which is time consuming
C. Eliminates jamming and loss of postage endemic to gummed tape dispensers
3. Heavy Duty Construction o Heavyy Duty Chair. Drive - our system is nr"
a very heavy duty construction and uses a very heavy duty gear construction
which makes our equipment both very quiet and require less maintenance.
4. Postage By Phone - This feature is only offered on Pitney Bowes equipment
at this time. When we discussed this with Mr. Hains' office he said to
just write down that it will be available in the near future and until then
the post office on site meter setting can be used.
The floating letter deck, heavy duty construction and heavy duty chain
drive are merely semantics and do not allow the Pitney Bowes equipment to
accomplish anything that the IMS equipment does not feature. The terminology
simply leads us to think Pitney Bowes is offering something not available on
IMS equipment which simply is not true.
Sin _ly, 4
David L. Cohen JUkIRV
3
.q 8--49f
fr. _ITY _r MIAW ^t CRt�
NTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
Honorable Mayor and Members aE June 9, 1988
of the City Commission
City Commission Meeting
June 9. 1988
.............. Agenda Items #10, #13. #27,
Jor a L.'Fer ndez #28, #55, #58, #59-#62,
City Attorn #70. #75 ,#83 and
Non -Agenda Items
(6)
The following information and material should be considered by
you in your deliberations at today's Meeting:
Agenda Item #10 (J--88-510) [Resolution accepting bids
for furnishing radiators and glass repairs) The bid
award for auto glass which is contained in this
Resolution, as distributed, incorrectly identifies the
lowest bidder for this service item. The cost per unit
when computed correctly establishes the Latin Auto
Glass, Inc. as the lowest bidder and we are forwarding
the corrected resolution to the City Clerk.
agenda Item #13 (J-88-514) [Resolution accepting bid
for an electronic mail processing system) A bid
protest has been filed in connection with this item.
The Chief Procurement Officer's rejection of the
protest based on the lack of responsiveness on the part
of the protesting bidder has been approved by the City
Manager and City Attorney. Accordingly, we are
attaching a resolution which provides for your approval
of the rejection and this attached resolution should be
Agenda Item #27 (J-88-528) [Resolution authorizing
agreement in connection with groundwater contamination
problem at South District Police Substation] This
contraot for the professional services in connection
vith this item has been reviewed and approved. A copy
�is attached for your information and reference. No
, change whatever is required in the resolution which may
e adopted as distributed.
S13496
RS-496-.
ID
Mayor and M.0.7ers of
the City Commission
June 9, 1988
Page 2
Q=d-g Its— m--*� (J-88-529) [Resolution settings
use fee for Federacion Deportiva Nicaraguense, Inc. at
Bobby Madura Miami Baseball Stadium) special
change has been made in the resolution is Although no
this item, a connection
Modifieded
incor
sae-�urofiar Porate a Provision for
adopted May Ig authorized by Ordinance assessment of
y 19, 1988. 10439,
NOTE: At the time the Consent
items (;10, #13 and #28) are not
and considered separately, there
by the Mayor that Items #10, modified•, #13
Agenda is voted upon. if these
removed frog the Consent Agenda
should be an announcement made
and #28 are being voted upon •aq
ill a wltPm #5� (J-88-485
aterfront ) [Ordinance establishing a
the
esistiag tAdvy Board] The Chairperson of
Proposed ordinance Waterfront Board requested that the reference distributed be modified to r this
Accordingly, we t0 appointment °P a remove
added the f have removed this provision and
being forwarded oto n helanguage in the ordinance d draft
y Clerk:
It shall be the duty
Provide administratie Be he City Manager to
which shall include the port to the Board
individual to keep minutes etOfQemeetingsof a
maintain Board correspondence, post meeting
notices, file reports, and perform all other
necessary support functions. [Section 4(e),
Page 4]
No
for rovision has of membership beenmade
based absence for automatic aabscremoval or
or tardiness
by the new Board's plenary
Power of removal is emembers. The Commission s which is contained in$thesodinanced in e as distributed age
All members shall serve without compensation
for terms of office as indicated hereunder
and shall be subje0t to removal by the
Commission for any cause. [Section 2(b).
Page 2]
98-49- 6
,48-49G.
4
r
Mayor and Members of
the City Commission
June 9. 1988
Page 3
Agenda Items #58 (J-88-498) [Resolution concerning the
Department of Off -Street Parking Five Year Strategic
and Financial Operations Plan] This item, as
distributed, reflected the Commission's ado„ ration of the
Plan as well as approval. For accuracy, we have
deleted the word "adopting" from the Resolution.
Agenda Items 059-62 (J-88-548, J-88-549, J-88-550,
J-88-551) [Resolutions concerning the annual budgets
for the Department of Off -Street Parking and the
operation of the Gusman Center for the Performing Arts
and Olympia Building, World Trade Center Garage and
Downtown Government Center Garage] These items. as
distributed, reflected the Commission's adoption of the
budgets for these entities as well as approval of the
budgets. For accuracy we have deleted the word
"adopting" from the Resolutions.
(J-88-493) [Resolution approving
escrow agreement with Swire Pacific Holdings, Inc.,
Vizoatran, Ltd. for elderly -handicapped housing] The
descriptive reference in the Resolution title to the
project as expressed has been added to the Resolution
body at the bottom of Page 1. No other change has been
made in the resolution as distributed and no change
whatever has been made in the Escrow Agreement.
Agenda Item #75 (J-88-568) [Resolution authorizing the
issuance of a Request for Proposal for Visions 20001
For clarity, we are attaching the draft of a Request
for proposals to be subsequently issued for the
procurement of professional consultant services in
connection with this item. No change has been made in
the Resolution.
Agenda item #83 (J-88-874) [Resolution determining
marketing, management, promotion, eto., services for
the Miami Design District Special Improvement District]
We are attaching background material in connection with
this item which was omitted from the Agenda Packet. No
change whatever has been made in the Resolution, as
distributed.
SQ-49G.
0 0
Mayor and Members of June 9. 1988
the City Commission Page 4
Non -Agenda Item (J-88-580) [Resolution authorizing
City Attorney to take all necessary steps against any
person or firm responsible for design and construction
of Miamarina Project for purpose of recovering City's
expenses] This item was distributed last week under a
separate transmittal memorandum and we are attaching it
herewith for convenience.
on -Agenda Item (J-88-583) [Resolution awarding
demolition bid contraotsI Due to the timeliness and
impetus of the City's enforcement measures on the
subject of "crack houses", we are forwarding material
which you may desire to consider today rather than
await the next Commission Meeting. The material is
self-explanatory and reflects compliance with
applicable City Code procurement provisions and may be
adopted today.
LAD:RFC:bss:P583
cc: Cesar H. Odio, City Manager
Natty Hirai, City Clerk
Ron E. Williams, Director, General Services Administration
Sergio Rodriguez, Director, Department of Planning
Walter Golby. Director
Department of Parks. Recreation and Public Facilities
Edith Fuentes, Director, Building and Zoning Department
John Gilchrist, Director, Department of Development
Jack Mulvena. Executive Director
Department of Off -Street Parking
Martha D. Fornaris, Assistant City Attorney
Linda K. Kearson. Assistant City Attorney
G. Miriam Maer. Assistant City Attorney
Joel E. Maxwell, Assistant City Attorney
Rafael E. Suarez -Rivas, Assistant City Attorney
fjts AA )e
r
'98-49G.
CItY OF MIAMI. FLORIbA
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
To The Honorable Mayor and
of the City Commis ion
FROM Cesar H. Odio
City Manager
RECOMMENDATION:
Members DATE
SUBJECT
REFERENCES:
ENCLOSURES:
13
"VIA 3 PILE
Resolution Authorizing
Award of Bid #87-88-075
Purchase of One Elec-
tronic Mail. Processing
System
It is respectfully recommended that the City Commission adopt the
attached resolution awarding a contract for the purchase of one
electronic mail processing system to Pitney Bowes, Inc., a non -
minority vendor as the lowest complete responsive bidder in
accord with Bid No. 87-88-075. Total cost of this equipment is
estimated to be $12,629.00, which funds shall be available from
the Graphic Reproductions Division, General Services
Administration Department.
BACKGROUND.:
The General Services Administration Department has analyzed bids
received pursuant to bid #87-88-075, to purchase one electronic
mail processing system for use of the City mailroom. This new
system will substantially improve the speed of mail handling by
the use of automated processes. It will also provide greatly
improved accountability and expenditure records by piece of mail
processed. The electronic postage -by -phone feature will also
accelerate the handling of mail by the City's mail room, which
handles approximately four thousand to six thousand pieces of
mail daily. It is recommended award be made to Pitney Bowes,
Inc., a non -minority vendor, as the lowest complete, acceptable
responsible and responsive bidder, in the amount of $12,629.00.
Funds for this purpose are available from the 1987-88 budget of
the Graphic Reproductions Division, General Services
Administration Department.
Amount of Bid: $12,629.00
Budgeted Amount: $12,629.00
Source of Funds: Graphic Reproductions Division, General
Services Administration Department, Account No. 420501-850.
Minority Participation: Award is to a Non -Minority vendor.
Public Hearings/Notices: N/A
198-49G.
0 0
•_ __��ra.r _� � hf 1.'a hl �' :=< F It Lt
City Of MIAMI, FLORIO&
IN -MR -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
William J. Schaut
pro eme t sup rvisor
pr reme t n Bement Division
Ron fl ams, Director
Gen ra►l Services Administration
P. .
DAM May 24, 1988 r1611
,ur�cr Bid #87-88-075 Purchase
of One Electronic Mail
Processing System
RtOItRENfK!•
IMC-LDOUWSbi
This Department has verified with the Departments of linance and
Management 6 Budget that funds shall be available from the
Graphic Reproductions Division, Account 420501-850 of the General
Services Administration Department, for the purchase of one
`electronic mail processing system to Pitney Bowes, In4e, h non -
minority vendor as the lowest complete responsive bidder in
accord with Bid No. 87-88-675. Total cost of this eqquipment is
estimated to be $12,629.00Account 420501-850 of the General
Services Administration Department, to furnish .
FINANCE REVIEW AND APPROVED BY:
N/A
1 Carlos Garcia, Director
Department of Finance '
BUDGETARY REVIEW AND APPROVED BY:
ADDITIONAL, APPROVALS
(IF CREW—VIREP) .
N/
Sergio Rodriguez'rD'rec-
t9r, Planning Dept.
���_ _, _,w _. - --• - - • .. ....�'w t0unnq nQu�N p�0 fM�
Man oha rang; D,.." Di rec-
Depar m t of Mane „ REQUEST evelop-
aoUTiNG
Plus• To �.
11EA0
MAHD�E � - ,,�• fj
[lT APV►+t.vE /` sty i�-5
M
88-496.
AWARD OF 81 D
Bid No- 87-88�075
1TVM..
One Electronic Mail Processing System
DEPARTMENT:
General Services Administration
TYPE OF PURCHASE:
Short term contract
REASON:
This new system will substantially
improve the speed of mail handling by
the 'use of automated process at the
City`s mailroom. It will also provide
greatly improve accountability and
expenditure records by piece of mail
processed.
POTENTIAL BIDDERS:
12
BIDS RECEIVED:
2
TABULATION:
BIDDER AMOUNT
Friden Alcatel $14,000.00
Pitney Bowes 12,629.00
FUNDS:
1987-88 Operating Budget Acoount Code
No. 420501-850.
MINORITY PARTICIPATION: No minorities were listed for this
service. Courtesy bids were sent to Fifteen (15) Minority
Organizations.
No Minority response was received.
BID EVALUATION: The bids meet the specifications.
Following is an analysis of the
Invitation to Bid:
Number of Bid
Number of
Category
Invitations Mailed
Responses
Prior Bidders
Black American
0
0
Hispanic American
0
0
Woman owned
0
0
Non -Minority
0
0
New Bidders
Black American
0
0
Hispanic American
0
0
Woman owned
0
0
Non -Minority
12
2
Courtesy Notifications
15
0
"No Bids"
-
6
Late Bids
-
0
Totals
27
8
Page 1 of 2
88-4961
ke-a3fns for "No Bid" were as follows.,
1= Delta Business Systems "Do not carry product line"
= International Mailing System "Do not meet spec ficationS
for required product."
3. Malvern Scale Data Systems "Do not manufacture."
4. Smith Scale, Inc. "We do not habndle the complete
system.,,
= Bell & Howell "We do not manufacture this specific type
of system."
b. Automated Business Machines "We do not carry this item."
RECOMMENDATIONS IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE AWARD BE
MADE TO PITNEY BOWES, INC. AT A TOTAL
PROPOSED AMOUNT OF $12,629.006
Procurement Supervisor
Dat e
The Minority Procurement Officer concurs with the above
recommendation.
CL
Lofficer
Date
Page 2 of 2
�6--49
a
0e, CITY OF MIAM: , FLOR:DA �
PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT DIVISION
BID NO. E 7-8F-_0`'5
BID SHEET
IMPORTANT: BID SHEET AND BIDDER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT MUST BE RETURNED IN
DUPLICATE IN ATTACHED ENVELOPE IDENTIFIED BY BID NUMBER,
TIME AND DATE OF BID OPENING.
(after delivery)
Terms: S12,629.00 net 30 days( Include cash discount for prompt
payment, if any) PURCHASE r
six month rental of $505.16/month-(includes maintenance) ADD METER RENTAL -see attach
Additional discount of n/a % if awarded all items.
Warranty and/or guarantee: see attachXd �'O
State any, variances to specifications (use separate sheet if
necessary) : all requirements met
Delivery: 30 calendar days required upon receipt of Purchase
Order.
General Services Administration Department
Delivery Point(s): Graphic Reproductions Division/Mailroom
1390 N.W. 20th Street
Miami, F1 33142
In accordance with the Invitation to Bid, the Specifications, General
Conditions, Special Conditions, and General Information to Bidders, we
agree to furnish the Items) at Prices indicated on the attached bid
sheet(s).
NAMES OF COMPANY OWNER(S):
Public Company
NAMES.OF
COMPANY
OFFICERS:"3
attached
is
a list of
Directors,
Corporate Officers, and Operating
Units
(Please use the back of this page if more space is necessary)
MINORITY PROCUREMENT COMPLIANCE
The undersigned bidder acknowledges that it has received a copy of
Ordinance No. 10062, the Minority Procurement Ordinance of the.City of
Miami, and agrees to comply with all applicable substantive and
procedural provisions therein, including any amendments thereto.
BIDDER: Pitnev Bowes, Inc. Signature: _:�./�i��c a .ca
(company name)
Print Name: Natalie Ho Sang
Indicate if Minority Business: Date: April 22, 1988
( ) Black ( ) Hispanic ( ) Women
FAILURE TO COMPLETE, SIGN, AND RETURN THIS FORM MAY DISQUALIFY THIS
BID.
` 8-496.
TA
#lire oars, Officers, and O!� 9 eratin Uni#sue
Directors
Colin G. Campbell
President
Wesleyan University
Donald W. Dads
Chairman
The Stanley Works
tool and hardware manufacturer
John C. Emery, Jr.
Former Chairman, President.
and Chief Executive Officer
Emery Air Freight Corporation
George B. Harvey
Chairman. President, and Chief
Executive Officer
Pitney Bowes Inc.
Charles E. Hugel
President and Chief Executive
Officer
Combustion Engineering
principal products are power
generation. and process
equipment and systems
David T. Kimball
Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer
General Signal Corporation
manufacturer of
instrumentation and control
systems anti industnai
equipment
Denis F. Ivlufane
Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer
Connecticut Mutual Life
Insurance Company
Eleanor Holmes Norton
Professor
Georgetown University Law
Center
Phyllis Shapiro Sewell
Senior Vice President
Federated Department Stores,
Inc.
retailer
Frederick C. Smith
Retired Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer
Huffy Corporation
bicycle and sporting goods
manufacturer
Ar:hur R. Taylor
Dean of the Faculty of
Business. Fordham University.
:nd Chairman
inbur Taylor & Co.
.investment roar
LJ
Julia M. Walsh
;Managing Director
Julia A Walsh & Sons, Inc.
(a division of Tucker, Anthony
& R.L. Day, Inc.)
investment firm
Corporate Officers
George B. Harvey
Chairman. President, and
Chief Executive Officer
Cam-dne F. Adimando
Vice President -Finance and
Administration
James L. Bast
President
Pitney Bowes Business
Systems
:Marc C. Bresiawsky
President
Dictaphone Corporation
Allan A. Crystal
Vice President -Treasurer
Steven J. Green
Vice President -Controller
Edward M. Harris. Jr.
Vice President, Secretary,
and General Counsel
Iliro R. Ilir,.-randani
President
Pitney Bowes Business
Systems-Intemadonal
Harry W. Neinstedt
President
Pitney Bowes Financial.
Services
Ante Pol
Vice President -Personnel
Paul Reece
Vice President -Corporate
Engineering and Technology
Carole F. St. Mark
Vice President -Corporate
Planning and Development
Elton R. Vogel
President
Pitney Bowes Business
Supplies
Operating Units
Pttnev Bowes Business
Systems-U.S.
Pitney Bowes Business
Systems -International
Pitney Bowes Ges. m. b. H..
Austria
Pitney Bowes of Canada
Ltd.
Pitney Bowes Oy, Finland
Pitney Bowes Deutschland
GmbH
Pitney Bowes (Ireland)
Limited
Dodwell Pitney Bowes
K.K.. Japan
Pitney Bowes Svenska
Aktiebolag, Sweden
Pitney Bowes A.G.,
Switzerland
Pitney Bowes plc, U. K.
Pitney Bowes Facsimile
Systems
Voice Processing Systems
Dictaphone Corporation.
U.S.
Dictaphone Canada Ltd.
Dictaphone International
A.G., Switzerland
Dictaphone Company
Limited, U.K.
Pitnev Bowes Business
Supplies
Baldwin Cooke Inc., U.S.
Baldwin Cooke Company
Ltd., Canada
Monarch Marking Systems,
Inc., U.S.
Monarch iMarking Systems
Australia Pty. Ltd.
Monarch Marking Systems
Ltd., Canada
Monarch Marking Systems
de :Mexico. S.A. de C. V.
:Monarch Marking (S. E. A.)
Pte. Ltd., Singapore
Pitney Bowes Marking
Systems Ltd., U.K.
Pitney Bowes France S.A.
Data Documents Systems,
Inc., U. S.
Wheeler Group Inc., U.S.
Pitnev Bowes Financial
Services
Pitney Bowes Credit
Corporation. U.S.
Colonial Pacific Leasing
Corporation. U. S.
PB Leasing Limited. U.K.
Pitnev Bowes of Canada
Ltd. -Leasing Division
Adrema Leasing
Corporation. West
Germany
Pitney Bowes Real Estate
Financing Corporation
N
88-496