HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-88-0866J-88-774(b)
8/9/88
RESOLUTION NO. 88--86f;
A RESOLUTION REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE
ZONING BOARD AND DENYING THE APPLICATION FOR
VARIANCE FROM ORDINANCE 9500, AS AMENDED, THE
ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI,
ARTICLE 20, SECTION 2024, SUBSECTIONS
2024.1.3 AND 2024.10, TO ALLOW AN EXTENSION
OF THE EXISTING DOCK AND CATWALKS 10' FOR A
TOTAL OF 35' (25' MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED),
FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3590 CRYSTAL VIEW
COURT, MIAMI, FLORIDA, (MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED HEREIN), AS PER PLANS ON FILE, AND
SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY STAFF IN ONE YEAR AND
REPORT BACK TO THE ZONING BOARD; ZONED RG-2/2
ONE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL. THIS
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE HAS A TIME
LIMITATION OF TWELVE MONTHS IN WHICH A
BUILDING PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED.
WHEREAS, the Miami Zoning Board at its meeting of
July 18, 1988, Item No. 11, following an advertised hearing,
adopted Resolution No. ZB 104-88, by a seven to two (7 - 2) vote
granting a variance as hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, adjacent property owners have taken an appeal to
the City Commission from approval of the variance; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission after careful consideration of
this matter finds that there are no peculiar circumstances
affecting this parcel of land nor any practical difficulties and
unnecessary hardships which would impair the owner's right to the
reasonable use of the property without the grant of variance as
hereinafter set forth;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The decision of the Miami Zoning Board in this
matter is reversed and the request for a variance from Ordinance
9500, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami,
Article 20, Section 2024, Subsections 2024.1.3 and 2024.10, to
allow an extension of the existing dock and catwalks 10' for a
total of 35' (25' Maximum Heiqht Allowed), for the property
located at 3590 Crystal View Court, Miami, Florida, more
particularly described as Lots 11 and 12, Block 2, CRYSTAL VILV
SUP, as recorded in Plat Book 12 at Page 47 of the Public Records
of Dade County, Florida, as per plans on file, subject to review
by staff in one year and report back to the Zoning Board, and a
time limitation of twelve months in which a building permit must
be obtained; Zoned RS-2/2 One Family Detached Residential, is
hereby denied.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of September , 1988.
AT T
TTY HIRAI
City Clerk
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
MI RIAM ER
sistant ity Attorney
GMM/rcl/M780
yc'-44L •
,VIER L. SUAREZ,
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
CORRECTNESS:
- - a-10- - - - "'
O GE L. FE ANDEZ
Ci y Attorn
PZw20
ZONING FACT SHEET
LOCATION/LEGAL
3590 Crystal View Court
Lots 11 b 12
Block 2
Crystal View Sub (12-47) P.R.D.C.
APPLICANT/OWNER
Jeffrey Tardiff, MO
3590 Crystal View Court
Mimi, FL 33133 Phone #854-8383
ZONING
RS-2/2 One Family Detached Residential
REQUEST
Variance from Ordinance 9500, as mended, the
Zoning Ordinance of the City of Mimi, Article
20, Section 2024, Subsection 2024.1.3 and
2024.10 to permit an extension of the existing
dock and catwalks 10' , for a total of 35' (25
maximum allowed); zoned RS-2/2 One Family
Detached Residential.
RECOM EMT I ONS
PLANNING DEPARTMENT DENIAL. There is no hardship which justifies
the 9rantlng of this variance. The existing
dock and catwalks should not extend beyond the
twenty five feet (25') maximum allowed. The
excessive length of the docks merely to
accommodate the two existing boat lifts is a
self-imposed hardship. These extended
structures would not conform with the character
of a single family residential district, would
create a detrimental effect on adjoining and
nearby residential properties and would create a
negative impact on this entire single fmily
residential area.
PUBLIC WORKS
DADE COUNTY TRAFFIC
AND TRANSPORTATION
No comments.
No comments.
ZONING BOARD At its meeting of July 15, 1"16 10a, be
�
adopted Res. Ohas$ by& 7. t4 A rat.
the above..
Seven proponents and f if. i
present at the rating. FMB
One reply is favor and tiMree repluis 00
woe received by mail.
APPEAL Letter of appeal dated August 2, 19M
from Coconut Grove Civic Club.
HISTORY
Planning and Zoning Board Meeting 01/10/49
REQUEST Lots 1 through 12, Block 2,
Zoning Change from R-1 to R-3.
Planning and Zoning Board
Planning and Zoning Board
Zoning Board Meeting 12/17/79
REQUEST
Planning Department
Zoning. Board
City Commission 01/24/80
Deferred to be readvertised.
Denied on 02/14/49.
Variance to allow existing fence
9'-10" at the highest point, with
an arch 8'-11" and a pillar 10'-5"
(8' allowed on all three cases),
on Lots 11 and 12, Block 2.
Denial .
Denied on 12/17/79. Res. Z8 249-79.
Denied appeal. M 80-63.
Zoning Board Meeting 09/08/80 (L'Hermitage)
REQUEST Conditional Use to permit mooringq
piles on Biscayne Bay extending 35'
(25' permitted) on Tract "A"
L'Hermitage.
Planing Department
Zoning Board
Zoning Board Meeting 11/16/87
REQUEST
Approval.
Granted. Res. ZB 167-80.
Appeal of Class C-87-726 Special
Permit disapproved by the Planning
Director on 10/02/87 to legalize
an after -the -fact extension of a
dock 37.15' into Biscayne Say,
under Section 2510 - Preservation
of Natural or Archeological
Features.
Planning Department Denial. There is no justifiC414".
for the extension of the 464k
beyond the 25' allowed beaauta 14e.
natural feature is being pres..
as a direct result of the extiZ4T*M. Y
Zoning $Gard Deferred."`
r
{
Law Department Memorandu• 11/19/87 declared the
Zoning Board divested of
jurisdiction to hear any further
proceeding on this matter after the
appeal was withdrawn by applicant
on 11/12/87.
Code Enforcement Board 11/18/87
The Miami Code Enforcement Board
gave Or. Tardiff until 01/15/88 to
correct code violations on illegal
docks, if not, a fine of $280 a
day would be imposed until he
complies.
City Commission Meeting 01/28/88
Variance granted until 04li8/N
Res. 88-107.
r
m'r
Coconut Grove Civic Club
p.o.box 381 coconut grove florida 33133
August 2, 1988
Gloria Fox
City of Miami Building
and Zoning Department
Hearing Boards Division
275 Northwest 2nd Street
Miami, Florida 33128
RE: APPZAL OF ZONING VARIANCE GRANT2D TO JZFFRZY
TARDIFl, M.O., JULY 18, 1908
Dear Ms. Fox:
Pursuant to Articles 31 and 32 of the Zoninq Code of the
City of Miami, the Coconut Grove Civic Club, representing its
members generally including Ms. Sylvia Goldstein of 3560
Crystal View Court, as aggrieved parties, requests a review by
the Miami City Commission of the zoning variance granted
Jeffrey Tardiff, M.D. of 3590 Crystal View Court, by the Zoning
Board on July 18, 1988.
In addition we request copies of all documents in Zoning
Department, Public Works Department, Planning Department and
any other city department files which pertain to Dr. Tardiff
and his variance requests.
Thank you very much for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
Tucker &ibbs,
Prosidant,
TG/jal
CITY ;'F_'�'t N!
HEARING
ELEANOR S. MILLER
.pp JUL29 PA :41 1Q11►1 98TAT( •wowtw
W 39SI COYSTAL VIEW GouAT
MIAMI. rLORIOA 33133
(30f) •SS-6149
July 11, 1988
Planning & Zoning board
City of Miami
Gentlemen/ Women:
.:e h=.»e received the request 'or a variance for exten-
sion of the dock at 3590 Crystal View Court by Dr. Jeffrey
Tardiff. Si:ice we will be unable to appear in person
on the date of the hearing, we wish to make our views
Known.
'we are sure you are familiar with the history of this
doct which w-is built originally v ithout a permit --nd
which exceeded the specifications of the City of Milmi's
zonine ordinances. As I last recall, Dr. Tardiff was
given until Azril 15, 1988 to mace his dock conform
with those ordinances, whi.ch I believe he did.
Why then, are he once %pain faced with a request to
return to the previously denied, illegal status of this
dock?
'.re admire Dr. Tardiff's persistence. however, his
"chutzcah" has cost the taxpayers enough in both time
and pacer Work.
'ae reoeat our renjor objection: 'There is some 300 feet
of waterfront property zoned for family residences
,just north of the Tardiff property. How many docks will
be !illowed here when houses are wilt can this land, some
of uaich is vacant now? And how far out will these docks
be permitted to extend into the bay, given the precedent
r
of Dr. T:irdiff"s variance?
It Dr. Tardifr co-tinues to acquire larger boats or to
o_:er the facilities of his dock (a) to othtrsv.jwatr
an entire neighborhuod, in additi:;,n to the bay, gear the
impact?
Please count us as opposed to this request for verianee
at 3590 Crystal View Court, Ntami.
cc: Y:nyor, Yours truly e
City of r:iami �Xt
- y
'.�., . , r • ,� ;. s
City of Mir Ai
eanor
sti a i .
�� n • ri Ih i a ..w ..�
CITY OF MIAMI
HEARING M1. Ru; ' ; I.1, :
18 ,AEI —7 P 3 34
PETITION FOR VARIANCE File Number V43-
A variance is relazation of the terms of the ordinance where such action wilt not be
eaurary to the pubUc interest and where, owing to conditions pecuLior to the
property and not the result of actions of the applicant, literal enforcement of Oft
ordinance would resuLt in unnecessary. and undue hardship on the property. As used in
Ws ordinance, a variance is authorised only for hetght, area, size of strucwre,
dimensions of yards and other open spaces and o f jstreet awing or loading
requirements (Section 3101)
i, AFFREY G. TUDIFF, ii D. hereby petition the City of Miami Zoning
Board or a variance trom the terns of the "Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami;
affecting property located of Miami, as
specified below' Coconut Grove: Florida 33133
In support of this application, the following material is suMit"te4twfith this application
1. Two copies of a survey of the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered
Land Surveyor. —
._ L Four copies oh the site plan showing (as required) property boundaries, existing
Of any) and proposed structure(s), parking, landscaping, etc; building elevations
and dimensions and computations of lot area (gross cnd net), building spacing, UA
ratios, and height envelope.
Lk'- 3. Affidavits disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure
of interest form (Forms 4-83 and 4a83, attach to application).
4. Certified list of owners of real estate within 37.7 radius from the outside
boundaries of property covered by this application. (Form 6-83 and attach to
application.)
i
�) � S. At least two photographs that snow the entire property (land an.! improvements).
.__ 6. Other (Specgy). , G re: fcol
T. Fee of $ to apply toward the cost of processing, based of the followkMp
(a) R S, RG- I $100.00
(b) For penetration of Plane III
by antennas and the like $300.00
(c) All other applications for
each request variance $O.OSper sq.ft. of floor area of buildkVW
from the ordinance minimum - %W.00
(d) Surcharge equal to applicable fee from (a)-(c) above, not to ececeW
C to bo ref if th/-j
'is no appeal. (City Code • Section 4241)
7
.0� r +a._ ..M
n
CITY OF MIAMI
HEARING FOWDS Ft WK,'GN
10 ,J! -7 P3 34
The Variance requested is for reiief from the provisions of Section of
the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance as follows:
u �-� 0n Imo. pcj , � PAM 4.� a v
N4kc�e Sr c4 c4l c�o2 S A SQ-aStA.%
Q � q
�`reas. rj 3r1
!. In support of this application, the applicant is prepared to offer the following
evidence, an the point enumerated at Subsection 3103.1 of the City of Miami
Zoning Ordinances
Note: This appilcation cannot be accepted for Zoning Board action unless all of the
following six items are completed.
(a) Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the Iced,
structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands,
structures, or buildings in the same Zoning district In that: (list evidence to
be produced and use additional sheets, if necessary.)
u «eo CA— L o,, rr
�u� �' l
S S doh.
(b) The special conditions and circvrnstances do not resale from the oOiWd of
the petitioner in that: a
__ D_\ C- .�; ,ti � -�Cka'z_ co
�,.�., 1n c •� 'LL�> -' e v jc,`.c1 �g 1- •mac..
xs�
M94 �c� ► t'�}trc� :v W ai;..�+�* ice' �taii;
CITY OF MIAMI
FEARING 80,11RISS r"A!I�N
V JUN -7 P 3 :34
(c) Literal intermvtatian of the provisions of the zoning ordinance would deprive
the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the sane
zoning district under the terms of the Zoning ordinance and would work
unnecessary and undue hardships on the petitioner In that:
c' ,�... �+� -�.►J .�er� �� . C�es. 7,�+a�-
1 �
Ual
V W \\ 11
ue.�.
(d) Granting the variance requested will not confer on the petitioner any M*dal
Privilege that is denied by the Zoning Ordinance to other lands, buildings, or
structures in the some zoning district in that.
1 e) 1 nn mQ A . 0 mot, c+e
Q" l D , i W4 JJ evi uae zf '• daa e�CC.C.vm �i�I ca�:0 ��anC Q— .
(e) The variance, if granted, is the minimum variance that will make poamab tlMt
reasonable use of the land, building, or structure in that:
Ci e,z o n S "-moo
�1 I Z I K'-la �7_\ 0
C1�
44 \f4%11.4 1-4 4.4.c� ,c..C14C -0 sJ
•vim 1�...
CITY OF MIAMI
HEARING BOA : NIS'0N
10 ,II —7 P 3 34
(f) The grant of the variance will be in harmony with the genera! intent and
purpose of the Zoning Ordinance, and will not be injurious to the
neighborhood, or otherwise trimental to the public welfare.
S 1(Nc e 4 3 S So&v4co, ",i-x 1r,a-, b� �
� r•.,..�.� c�QC�� c�''do _e,� �_+ �er..,► �Q Sn�.� (��,, �''� sx,c�
04, Ar,,;.ce-
act
^n
1 << Ap Moe q
Noss: d eras, reports, stu,s�, tits or o wrt e�or graphic material to be
submitted tdthe ZoningBoars! shah be stAbmttted with tits application.
A�
Address . 4C4 r) ( 06& U )-e Li
� —
STATE OF FLORIDA) SSt - . -�-1 a��do 33133
COUNTY OF DAOE )
t 'J dui nd
�� a
says t ih whet! of the real property described In
answer to quest loff #I, above; that he has read the foregoing answers and that the same are
true and complete; and (if acting as agent for owner) that he has authority to emmute this
petition on behalf of the owner.
_Ln"o —r,_
SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED
before qw this . day of
1989.
tcry , btate or ortdo of
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES;
wAky Pointe sTATt V OLORMA
Kr tOntsstol tip. MAA 11,1311
&=a MV 691" =- We
Form 1-83
11,
oft
oftN C IAW
"Wo BOAKOS
��
CCXI! CF DADS )
AFFIDAVIT
16 JUN -7 P 3 34
Before me, t.1-A undersigned authorit-7, this day personally
MmLred who being by we first duly s+oni.
upon oa A and says:
1. That he is the owner, or the legal mix -- tative of the
owner, submitting the acca.-;mrying application for a public hearing as
required by Ordinance No. 9500 of the Code of the City of Miami. Florida.
effamtI g the real property located is the City of Miami as described and
Listed on t.~.e pages attached to this affidavit and grade a part thereof.
2. That all owners which he represents, if any, hive given their
full and cc:plete per=Luicn for him to act in their behalf for the change
-jr =dilication of a classification or regulation of zard nit as set out is
the acc=:;anpirg petition.
3. That the pager attached hereto and made a part of this
affidavit cocltaia the mureat rnames. smiling addresses, Fb=o mm bers and
legal dRscrtptiaaa for the real property which no is the mw or lepl
repcesumative.
4. The facts -as represented is the applicatiom and doa=ms
submitzed is canjuncti= with this affidavit are true and correct.
Further nlffL= sayeth not.
rA
Sworn to and Subscribed before me
this day of 19
l Stata of Florida at L irp
My Ccmmzssicn Expires:
IGjAIv PWIC $TAR OfROOM
in COMMISSION EA/. MAN 17.1"1
601M Two Kum W. W&
n
Mr. George Barket offered the following Resolution and
proved its adoption.
RESOLUTION ZB 104-88
AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN
SECTION 3101.1 OF ORDINANCE 9500, AS AMENDED,
THE ZONING BOARD GRANTED A VARIANCE FROM
ORDINANCE 9500, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, ARTICLE 20,
SECTION 2024, SUBSECTION 2024.1.3 AND 2024.10
TO PERMIT AN EXTENSION OF THE EXISTING DOCK
AND CATWALKS 10' FOR A TOTAL OF 35' ( 2 5 '
MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED), FOR PROPERTY LOCATED
AT 3590 CRYSTAL VIEW COURT ALSO DESCRIBED AS
LOTS 11 AND 12, BLOCK 2, CRYSTAL VIEW SUB
(12-47) P.R.O.C., AS PER PLANS ON FILE; AND
SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY STAFF IN ONE YEAR AND
REPORT BACK TO THE ZONING BOARD; ZONED RS-2/2
ONE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL. THIS
VARIANCE HAS A TIME LIMITATION OF TWELVE
MONTHS IN WHICH A BUILDING PERMIT MUST BE
OBTAINED.
Upon being seconded by Mr. Manuel Alonso-Poch, the
motion was passed and adopted by the following vote:
AYES: Ms. Basila
Messrs. Sands, Alonso-Poch,
Barket and Dunn
NAYES: Ms. Morales
Messr. Moran
ABSENT: Messrs. Luaces and Mayor
Ms. Fox: Motion carries 7-2.
a
�
�e � .•,.ate:}
i
15
h.
5' 1
r
S 'V
7
e i
S^ "
me MAM
-im. Al s twerim
Jul'7 P3 35
7. L'MERMITAGE AT SOUTH SArSMORE DRIVE
rat ;
L'MERMITAGE (111-22)
Conditional Use as listed in Ordinance 6871, ARTICLE IV, Section
23(2)(b), to permit mooring piles in Biscayne Bay adjacent to the
site described above, as per plans on file, extending 35' into the
Bay (25' permitted); zoned R-1 (One gamily Dwelling). f r y�}�
u1114I1
Secretaryfiled proof of publication of Legal Notice of Nearing
and administered oath to all persons testifying at this Hearing.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMr1ENDATION: APPROVAL
IN ACCGZJ WITH THE PLANS ON FILE. The ,proposed
000ring piles will riot rave an adverse effect
on the surrounding properties and they will
enable the adjacent development, L'Hermitage, a
75-unit P.A.u., to have better access to .;ie Bay.
Susan Groves, Planning Uepartment: ;4r. Lhairman, Members of the Board,
the Planning Depart,nent is recommending approval of t,ris Conditional Use application.
The applicant is asking to be able to extend the pilings an additional 101 out into
Biscayne Bay. Since this property does not have any property irmnediately east
of it, we see no proulem with granting.
mr. Adler: ;•ly name is Irwin Adler. I'm a principal in the firm developing
L'Herinitage and the address is 9200 South Oadeland Boulevard, Miami, Florida.
I think we can keep it quite simple. ::hen we put in the slips that we were per-
mitted for, and the seawall that went along the entire property, there was some
rip -rap and some debris that came out from,the seawall, ae from 5' to 91.
pulling it out. g va3-wrong oeeans-e the }Lace permit
and t he - CorpCIM right?
r pan' aiijyt�,fi Mrii a o}►e:�- rr't th n 8 i n any way and
I don't tninK : have to prolong this to ask your permission to allow it.
;,r. Gort: Thank you. Is there anyone in opposition to this application?
Then we'll close the public hearing.
;'r. Carner: 'gay 1 pose a question? The finger piers that are indicated
coining out from the seawall, are any proposed cnanyes in their length ur are they
as originally planned?
;�. Adler: Cverything is exactly the sdv,e.
.lr. C4rner: Thank you.
iasila: 'love it. *
.'r. Rolle: Second.
;'r. Gort: It has been moved and seconded. Any discussion on the MatiONI
Call t+ie question.
-42- t>»1 3.
�#
A -7 P 335
;tr. Pertt-Lugones: ,,otion was made to Vrant by its. Basil& and-secomed
!toile.
1's. Gloria Basil& offered the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ZB-167-80
Y,
ikff "I
MY, AWACE14
AGE
(i i�1�Egt3LI>�
• E��=FfO—T'!tC- FEET
Killa=D? t, I L Y
Upon being seconded by ".r. Ilellington Rolle, this resolution was passed
4nd adopted by the following vote:
AYES: " 1aes. 3aro, 3asi l a
;Iessrs. Carner, Garcia, ::oils, Gort
i:AYS: 'done
Absent: ".r. Alfonso
.ir. Perez-Lugones: •Motion to grant carries 6 - 0.
tiS � N
y:
♦��r
L
,t
•w— ,r'r�Rr � • y " �+ D .�� a Ri'.
wjkp* Pm r- s DFAM
'88 ,AEI -7 P 3 :35
�1•' � . ��w�� � , i � v •.mow .�t�rri,.
_ KIMGSMHARF, LTD.
c/o Sherwin Ross
9200 S. Dadeland Blvd. Suite 603
Miami, Fla.
_DE7ART!tENT OF ADMINISTRATION
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARDS
P. O. PAX 330709
ttAmj . ZO RI DA 33133
DATE: September 24, 1980
Your petition for a (x) Conditional us* was granted by
( ) Variance
the City of Miami (X ) Zoning Board on September 8, 1980
( ) City Commission
by Resolution No. 167-80 and reads as follows:
RESCLUTIOt! TO ,;i;,u;T CUi;DITiJi:AL SSE
t%S LISTEO Ii1 00IrW.CE o::11, AkT:CLE IY,
SECT I Oil 23(2)(b), TO PEAL .: T :'.JCi I ::G
PILLS 14 BISCAY!.E SAY :+;:JACL::T TU TH.E
31TE DESCnISED. AS Tw:CT "A"; L`;iEZiITA^
(111-22) 9EI;lG L'hER:"ITAG1w AT SVUTh
GAYSHORE OR I VE AS YETI PLAi;S 0". FILE
EXTEZI;:G 35 FEET :i:TO T!!E 2AY (25 7EET
PERi4ITTED); 204%;E1W :-1 (O; c FWILY
This Variance or Conditional Use will expire on March 8. 1981
unlass you obtain a B;- .dinq Permit or Certificate of Use based upon
and incorporatinq this Variance or Conditional Use during this period.
The expiration time of this action can be extended by the Citf :tanager
with the approval :,f the City Commission for one (1) year. If you
require this extension of time, direct a letter requesting such ex-
tcnaion to the City Harager at least thirty (30) days prior to the
expiration.
DZ?ARTIMME iT OF AC:4INISTRATION
pLAtiNTN%; AND '20:1I.10 WARDS
cc: Building Dept.
d/8/7d
=r
s:
a$ g
t ids �
rhrt
t'
LOCAT':ON/LEGAL
OWNER/APPLICANT
ZONING
REQUEST
RECOMMENDATIONS
PLANNING DEPT:
PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT
D.O.T.T.
7
,e4 WLW
« :.,.
^N—
IN JA"7 P3 36
ZONING FACT SHEET
L'HERMITAGE at -South Bayshore Drive
Tract "A"
L'MERMITAGE (111-22)
K I NGSwHARF , LTD.
c/o Sherwin Ross
9200 S. Dadeland Blvd. Suite 603
Miami. Fla. - Phone N 667-7583
R-1 (One Family Dwelling).
Conditional Use to permit mooring piles
on Biscayne Bay adjacent to the site described
above, as per plans on file extending 35'
into the Bay (25' permitted).
APPROVAL IN ACCORD WITH THE PLANS ON FILE.
The proposed mooring piles will not have an adverse
effect on the surrounding properties and they will
enable the adjacent development, L'Hermitage - a
75-unit PAD, to have better access to the Bay
No dedication.
No objection to this item.
M� Bans S
N i;3�
HEARING FviR(i.) D'VISrnN
P A RTM E c! T C1 1 A La 1 i ', 15 ':. -A T ; ".. , C n F i' N 1 /�MI TIGA RUu
J57y-60A2
I
,
P . 0. BOX 706, M.I AMI , FLOkI:,A 3 3 1 .� j -
APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE
Rt0UI REMENTS :
All documents, reports, studies, exhibits, or other written or grsphie
materials, if any, to be used by the applicant in support of the appli-
cation for Oonditional Use shall be submitted with and be a part of
1.
this application.
;
.) Certified list
of owners of reel estate within 375, radius f om the
boundaries k
outside of the subject parcel. ( t1, i }� `r
L.�G Grz
written petition demonstrating that the Conditional Use will be in
harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance, will not be injurious to the neighborhood or to
adjoining properties, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare,
with reference to the standards set out in ORD. 6871, ART. XXXII,
Section 2. (1) M . (See attached sheet)
1
JCurrent survey of the property.
Site plans showing placement of structures on property! provisions
for ingress and egress of traffic and pedestrians oft -street parking
and loading areast refuse and service areast required yards and other
.R
open spacest proposed locations for utilities hookupsr soreeoinq and
buffering, with reference' to type, dimensions and characters proposed
landscaping and provisions for protection of treesy proposed signs and
lightinq, including
'.
type, dimensions, and characters other details as
say be set out the Zoning Ordinance.
( ). Fee of 00.00 to apply toward cost of processing *accept FW.
:'''s
`
b). Resider lopment of Planned Unit Wature.... M./dwellina urAt.
1)Affidavit by the owner of the property, or his attorney, that all
facts as represented in the application are true and correct.
r�
-t - %-44n photograph of the property. 09�0 s� �� •St''�
3
DATE April 25, 1980
t
The undersigned, being the owner of representative of the owner, of the
property located at L'HERMITAGE at South Bayshore Drive
AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS:
Lot (s) A
Block -
SUBDIVISION - a) �,�,2� 0-2
•
do(es) respectfully petition and request that I (we) be granted a "CONDITIONAL
USE" as listed in ARTICLE IV ,Section 23(2)(b) to permit mooring
piles on Bisca Bay adjacent to 4n site described above, as per plans
on file extending 35' into the Pay (25' permitted). Zoned R-1(One Family
Dwellina).
S IGNED ADDRESS snot.......
1a
— swot 1 3/15/77 4
STATE OF FLORIDA)
SS.
COUNTY OF DADE )
�pr
M i � 1 :
r . 7
CITY OF M►A 4
W' 80ARJS ` 1V►S10N
Before me, the undersigned authority, this day
personally appeared S ME R w 10i ;FOSS V who being by me
first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says:
1. That he is the owner, or the legal representative
of the owner, submitting the accompanyinq application for a
public.hearinq as required by Ordinance 6871 or the Code of
the City of Miami, Florida, effecting the real property located
in the City of Miami as described and listed on the pages
attached to this affidavit and made a part hereof.
2. That all owners which he represents,
have given their full and complete permission for him to act
in their behalf for the change or modification of a classifi-
cation or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying
petition.
3. That the rages attached hereto and made a part
of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses,
phone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property
which he is the owner or legal representative.
4. The facts as represented in the application and
documents submitted in conjunction with ti,is affidavit are
true and correct.
Further Affiant sayeth not.
KiwcswPWs{. L.r.J
M1 iw.+M^A RP. (i rNlM1.
(Nasae )
Sworn to and Subscribed before me
0-1
/day of �t�t� 19SO
"ora.y F.:ol:c, State of Florida at Large
Hy c4a mission zxpires 3
W COIN" W "Wa aw of tw
e
G?Y''*"AAf
NEARMt3 POAmO •' ' .,SION
V JUN —7 P 3 34
DZIM4= or C HIP
1. description and street address of subject real ptapesty:
'359t� Cw3s6mk Li4U,., Cr:UA 0Akc6x4 33133
1 Z r3loc4z- Z , Crysd k i e4,, S "Ld 1 10 13
2. Owner(s) of subject real prcoerty and percentage of ownership.
Mote: City of Miami Ordinance No. 9419 requires disclosure of all parties
ivinq a financial interest, either direct or indirect. in the subject
*Attar of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission.
Accordingly, question +2 requires disclosure of all shareholders of
aorporstions, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties,
together with heir addresses and ptvcortionate interest.
3. Le9a1 description and street address of any real property (a)
owned by any party listed in answer to .question s2, and (b) located within
375 feet of the subject real property. '
r
beirq duly sworn, deposes and
says IS/ the ( r1 ( ) of the real property
descr Rd Ln answer to question tl, abavet that he has read the foregoing
answers and that the same are true and c=pletes and (if acting as attocney
for owner) that he has authority to exm=te this Disclosure of Ownership
foes on behalf of the owner.
br14N1 10 AND SU8=Mm
begme this � f
days of
-W C,.Ovmz= lIPTYSAS
(WAL)
i J
k
WMW omit ttmn at L"" rq �rt
+1l r:Iamfox tip. "s 11.1im
*ms you fiLWU Us. dr. � ��u
0'644fR' S LIST
Owner ' s Name T V 1 �'►
Nailing Address ICPLI 0I 4e4 ZZ 3RU
Telepnone Number
Legal Description: �D TS // d / 2 B lOck-
Cr7-%4Q UI
Owner's Nape 4 'IV C(3 ct
Mailing Address_
Telephone Number_
Legal Description
Owner s Name
Mailing Address -41110
Telepnone Number
Legal Description:
Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally
(by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375' of the subject
site is listed as follows:
Street Address Legal Description
Street Address
461 sa6 ►%UWF r.aa
Legal Description
Legal Description
C
September 27, 1988
The Mayor i City Commissioners
City of Miami
City Mail
Dinner Key
Pan American Drive
Coconut Grove, Fl. 33133
Re: Dr. Tardiff's dock - Crystal View Court
Gentlemen:
This letter represents the Board of Directors and residents of L'Nermitage,
who hereby authorize the Coconut Grove Civic Club to present this letter to
the Commission on our behalf.
This will confirm that we have been, and continue to be opposed to the
approval of Dr. Tardiff's dock, and we urge the Commission to seriously
consider our objections to his request, which we have continually expressed
and should be contained in the copious records pertaining to this matter.
Very tr y yours
LINE _ ASSOCIATION, INC.
s dent
MAM/ jc Submitted into the public
record in connection with
iteme2 %Zo on 9 Z 711V,
Matty Hirai
City Clerk _.
L'"ERMITA G E
MOO a auoh toyehorw di+w / 0000nue gnaw. Aew^Mn Malmo / limed