HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-89-0083T— —
�h z:.2 +� �s .Y y iP �J6 kT `�} � L a"# iba �•"" Y. - ff -
'•S�' 1 �������� i 1 t F fF �tx-
2 �}
89-83
RESOLUTION NO. _
A RESOLUTION INSTRUCTING THE CITY MANA0ER TO
REJECT FROM FURTHER CONSIDERATION THEtF�"�
PROPOSED ONE-WAY TRAFFIC CONTROL MEASURES IN
THE DAY'HEIGHTS/NATOMA MANOR NEIGHBORHOODS.
1
`?`t
DE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIA�+II r
PtDRIDAt
Section al. The City Manager is hereby instructed to
reject from further consideration the proposed one-way traffic Y:=
control measures in the Bay Heights/Natoma Manor neighborhoods.. U�
This Resolution shall become effective
Section 2 . .-
immediately upon its adoption pursuant to law. 'r
i
_; sk
�i PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of January , 1989 s
XAVIER L. S EZ., MAYOR �`°
ATT T
F�
MA HIRAI--
CITY. CLERK
- _ t t 1: _ C>}•r JS t x.-_ 'x t,•c .,i#CiY
`fie
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
14'Yy"''r`tf
.. t ,.i- �, S % t �g� 4'�ry Y�r��H :. r� ��'4',� �•vr�*a`7s ,�—
ROBERT F . CLARR ,+ ;; ti �' Yy. �� , kf
'Z L t' 4 SS 3Jt'+Si
CEiIEF DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY,}�`
Wi ,•.�.-*",�_�
\ l 1 ��7 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS:%
r'' � �� � � x���fr��� J�i".y-xf���k � ""�� 1�+J %�'�•�,}'t� 5p.r��'
iw
JORGE L . FERNANDEZ
CITY TTORNEX y
3 i tS y ,rf,.'•t i• t.,'�,. x r4 Ffii'a s �•;z _.
RFCsbsstM920
rt � ' R ,� v �� ix " > "`�.-� ,ry j Sro '��f �(•.A'�'ay � a r Trr!,,y t ��ii�x i{ -
-.
/ t t ' ,. � \ K � ti .y r•t f y ` ='�1�; 1 !1!�������•C�' � �4
IN
{ k lr h •�� -, i y �� t f y * r,4 ���a S ? � y _ 4 Jf f .'y{,rf�i` t .ry> .iM Y i i 7 ! 111f �+S'� � �t�f'��Mi/� � �}a1T
LUQI�•11Q_
ESOTItka
s rJ t + xN Y
- r fL v,F .y. +. iZ a,r;2i a>r n.+.sL't/. „r`�i X's Pifs �• x7'-.a.�N.vy, t _„_+�',,7�eE1 - -_�a�-
L
1 j
11
CI'hl OF MIAMI. FLORIDA
INTER•OpFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City COMmi ssi on
i
PAM:
Cesar' H. Odi
City Manager
DATE DEC — 7 19108100 FILE :
SUBJECT : Public Hearing Concerning
the Bay Heights/Natoma
Manor Traffic Control
Measures
REFERENCES:
ENCLOSURESrWo (2) Sketches
�,_
is
ar
The purpose of the December 15,. 1988 Pont ollichearinmeasures ttohebe
comments on the proposed traffic c which
implemented in the Bay Heights/N autos a d/orr an
addi ti additional "right
includes a system of one way stre
turn only" lane on South Bayshore Drive.
BACKGROUND:
d comm
On September 8, 1938 the City utomaticmissio entrygatesysteentm
concerning the installation* of an a
which would have prevented vehicular traffic from entering the
Bay Heights/Natoma Manor Neighborhoods during the afternoon
hours. Upon consideration of the comments heard, the City
Commission decided NOT to implement the automatic entry gate n;
system and directed ire Department of Public Works to investigate
other methods of discouraging commuter traffic within the
neighborhoods. u
After consideration of previous findings and other information,
it has been determined that a new approach to reducing the f�
jams within these nei ghborh
traffic circulation probs the
necessary: one which will not severely inconvenience
residents and yet reduce commuter traffic. The Public Works and
Planning Departments are proposing that two southbound lanes be
maintained on South Bayshore Drive between Alatka Street and S.W.
17 Avenue. The additional lane will serve as a* "ri gFrt turn only"
1 ane ( from South Bayshore Drive onto S.W. 17 Avenue), and would,.
be constructed within the constraints of the State Historical
Nt ry w.
Highway Designation. This proposal will allow constant traffics
movement on Bayshore.Drive and eliminate the required "merge" at '
i 1
Z
Hal i ssee Street.�
nsi derati on i s a series
An alternate or additional plan for co
a
of streets within the Natoma Neighborhood which creates ;a r
"maze" effect and discourages the use of these re,sidenti4l K�
streets as• commuter thoroughfares. The enclosed` sketches„
represent these two alternatives of traffic control.��11;i
t r f & tr. 5Tf
r
ii
x u
a,t.,xit,-ria "'w Y r;x '� 7h ^r �'Xts^�"'$,vY^`r$`Kt�kd .:
�' J SR �'�. y ,,� R• �.t :..� k �� �'�3 - h fE i mYN SY ��P
Cos�issiv6h y,��
t!f . the c # ty
a
h the instructions of the CA ty Commissionhe d t�
In accordance with a ublic hearing ryas to bt
September 9, 1988 meeting$ p However, due to the need to gait
Nove�abor, ig88 on this subjecte for the
roval from Metropolitan Dade County it was
a conceptual app lane.
ve
proposed South Bayshoretime wouldigbe needed.nly In addition, :e
found that additional
property owner meeting was held December A, i98$ t0 discus
rtCu own6r
two .proposals whichsnandClUdNatoma ManoruNeighborhoods
within the Bay Height
•i. •. 1 t" V � ") r'b Vf i'� •/-,1"ttY Ar' J 5� 5�v'k"R �^» 'ir .1
g46,
at
S +
L-j�° t'� 5� y�•q{,w"^. r r4
? tri :.rat d ens b('yisy`x PSc t
o- � s 't t r r� °`+ c � 9: F'�"� i.��5 dc, -:ar �'r'»•t��,'�,ra�� .
� - 3`��1, �'�'-�£' � .. i s s > :. � S � `�`i �<r�y P"r`t � � •.,t +!"y i.+; "� t i�s 3��. � si*
-�5 -+,t+ �..Rk� ,,.1',:.tY 3 x +,h � fiy ,x K � t xx�ft• m •�'�F f43T ^. �'� �{.�v'�mgy£ fit? y.• �
� ���. �`,� �� rn��3tir* x�.�.��� iS� 1 � � ✓ '#�. �s� �1k � „�� iL� �^`4i4t''����''st��������aye�'.,,f' �"� �
+, ': v+e j«u�tr3+'l��viav�Se`.+r,''iT�'Sit+�3�'Y`�si`�.h15�fi'�`�,+a`oer� �rup"`>�"¢'''�k�x�"Y�' � 9k,+.c��.i�- � r p *� �� ^1 .;,;,•�i ��� �'
i
A• TEE
AWAY OR.
` T AY
■ No Rwr TURNO
it sm
AVE. .y
s.
rfq
S/ya IE sF=
a a �
O n; mustuM pt
Z
t1ArUNAL Ef
PS DRIVE AND Hnrc
s
H
ORr: _e
a: cs r *—"NO RIGHT TURR
slr,N
MIAMI
OPTIONAL IONE-WAY » STREETS
b i.
W
J� F. ¢W
^ P W N
ul
N
� a —
y• ADDITIONAL < a
"RIGHT TURN ONLY" _ —
LANE
SIGNAL.
,00
ro-ocx 100
SIGNAL
SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE
(SCHEMATIC DRAWING ONLY)
MERCY r.
CITY OF MIAMI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT HQSPZTAL i
PROPOSAL FOR ADDITIONAL RIGHT TURN ONLY LANE ENTRAN,;